Lanceljx
11:25
For the bond portion of my portfolio, I’d prioritise capital stability before chasing the highest yield.

A 3.60% YTM with roughly 2.3 years of duration is interesting because it offers a higher prospective yield while limiting interest-rate sensitivity compared with long-duration bonds. But I wouldn’t treat the 3.60% as equivalent to a guaranteed 3.60% return. Credit spreads, defaults, portfolio changes, fees and interest-rate movements still matter.

The comparison I’d make is against T-bills, SSBs, fixed deposits and money-market funds. If a short-duration bond ETF offers only a small yield premium, I may prefer the simpler and lower-risk alternatives. If the premium becomes meaningful, taking some duration and credit risk becomes more attractive.

For me, bonds should primarily stabilise the equity side of the portfolio. Yield is compensation for risk, not the objective by itself.

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Comments

We need your insight to fill this gap
Leave a comment