The US mid-term elections have delivered a resounding victory for the Democratic Party, which now controls both the House and Senate in one of the strongest mid-term performances in recent history. Yet despite the political significance of the so-called "blue wave", the market implications may be less dramatic than the headlines suggest.
Political shift, but likely limited policy impact
Although Democrats now control both chambers of Congress, their ability to drive major policy changes may be relatively limited. President Trump remains in the White House and retains veto power. As a result, the most likely outcome is continued political gridlock rather than a wave of sweeping legislative changes.
From a market perspective, that may not be a bad thing. Gridlock tends to reduce the risk of major policy surprises and can provide investors with greater visibility on the road ahead. It also lowers the likelihood of large new spending programmes, which helps explain why bond markets have responded positively to the election result.
The more meaningful implication may lie beyond the next few quarters. We think the election result may be a sign of a gradual shift in the US political landscape, potentially pointing to a weakening of Trump's influence over the Republican Party. At the same time, Democrats are likely to govern from a relatively centrist position given the breadth of their coalition, suggesting a move towards more moderate policymaking rather than a sharp swing to either end of the political spectrum.
That said, a divided government also means some longstanding challenges are unlikely to be resolved anytime soon. Persistent fiscal deficits and rising debt levels remain medium-term concerns, and political gridlock may make it difficult to address these issues in a meaningful way.
A constructive backdrop for equities and bonds
Overall, we view the election result as broadly market-neutral rather than a major catalyst for markets. The most immediate benefit is the removal of political uncertainty. Historically, equities have tended to perform well following mid-term elections as investors gain greater clarity on the political landscape and can refocus on underlying fundamentals.
The result may also provide some relief on the geopolitical front. Prior to the election, investors had grown increasingly concerned that the conflict with Iran could escalate further. Oil prices rallied sharply in October as markets priced in the risk of a broader confrontation following the elections.
Since the result, however, those concerns appear to have eased. Trump's response has been more conciliatory than many had expected, while Republicans appear to be viewing the Iran war as a contributing factor to their election losses. As a result, the party may be less willing to support any further escalation of tensions. In addition, Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth is facing increased political scrutiny, which could further reduce the likelihood of a significant near-term military escalation.
The market's reassessment of these risks can be seen in the steep drop in oil prices since the election, with oil falling to its lowest level in more than two months. Together with the reduction in political uncertainty, this could provide a more constructive backdrop for equities in the near term.
Bond markets have also responded positively, with Treasury yields moving modestly lower following the election result. Investors appear to be taking comfort from a more predictable policy environment and a reduced risk of major surprises.
Market expectations for Fed policy have changed little since the result as well, suggesting that growth, inflation and the interest rate outlook remain the primary drivers of markets. Once the initial election reaction fades, attention is likely to return quickly to these factors, which are likely to have a far greater influence on asset prices over the next 12 months.
Sector effects likely to be modest
At the sector level, the impact is likely to be modest. Healthcare appears to be one of the clearer beneficiaries, reflecting the Democratic Party's traditional focus on healthcare access and related investment. That said, the outlook is not entirely straightforward. While increased healthcare spending could support parts of the sector, greater scrutiny of pricing and profitability may offset some of these benefits.
Elsewhere, lower geopolitical tensions and softer oil prices could create a less favourable backdrop for parts of the energy sector. However, as with healthcare, the effects are likely to be incremental rather than transformational.
AI might face greater scrutiny, but long-term story remains intact
AI and tech have emerged as key areas of focus following the election. A Democratic-controlled Congress is generally expected to apply greater scrutiny to data centre development, particularly around permitting and infrastructure expansion.
This has raised questions about the pace of future AI infrastructure growth, particularly following the loss of a pro-data centre governor in Texas, which accounts for roughly a quarter of US data centre capacity. Greater scrutiny of new projects could slow approvals and create uncertainty around future data centre expansion.
Still, the risks should not be overstated. Most major data centre projects expected over the next two to three years have already secured permits and are currently under development. More importantly, the industry's biggest constraint today is not politics, but power availability. Even without regulatory changes, many planned projects may struggle to secure sufficient electricity supply.
As a result, we do not believe the election materially alters the long-term AI investment case. Demand for AI computing power continues to outpace supply, meaning that any moderation in data centre investment is more likely to delay demand than destroy it.
In fact, recent weakness in AI-related stocks suggests much of the concern may already be reflected in valuations. The resilience of names such as Microsoft and Amazon following the election result also indicates that markets may have largely priced in the perceived risks.
For investors, the key takeaway is to remain selective within the AI value chain. While the long-term AI investment theme remains intact, opportunities are likely to become more differentiated. Infrastructure, memory and critical hardware suppliers remain well positioned, while smaller AI companies and some AI model developers may find it harder to raise funding.
We therefore favour a selective approach, focusing on companies with strong competitive positions, existing infrastructure, access to power, and the financial resources to capitalise on continued AI growth.
Implications for Asia
For Asia, the most immediate impact is likely to be felt through the tech sector. Greater scrutiny of AI infrastructure and data-centre expansion in the US could weigh on sentiment, particularly if future projects face delays or a slower approval process.
In the near-term, Korea appears most exposed to any de-rating in AI hardware stocks, given its concentration in memory and semiconductor equipment manufacturers. Taiwan could also face pressure through foundries, AI server suppliers and component makers, while China and Hong Kong may experience indirect effects through AI hardware and technology supply chains.
However, looking beyond the AI sector, the broader macroeconomic implications could prove more constructive for Asia. Expectations of lower US Treasury yields and a weaker US dollar should help support liquidity, reduce capital outflow pressures and improve the relative attractiveness of Asian assets. A narrower yield gap between the US and Asia has historically provided a more supportive backdrop for Asian equities.
Within Asia, we see India as increasingly well positioned. As a relatively domestically driven economy, India is less exposed to potential disruptions to the AI supply chain while benefiting from lower oil prices, easing inflation pressures and resilient domestic inflows. Recent foreign investor outflows have also left valuations in parts of the market looking more reasonable, creating opportunities in selected areas such as banks, materials and industrials.
ASEAN could also benefit at the margin. Lower bond yields tend to support yield-sensitive segments such as REITs and high-dividend stocks, while softer oil prices should ease inflationary pressures across many of the region's energy-importing economies.
Against this backdrop, we favour domestic-demand stories and income-generating opportunities across the region, particularly in markets that stand to benefit from lower yields, softer oil prices and supportive local liquidity conditions.
Please refer to uobam.com.sg/awards for the latest list of UOBAM awards.
**********
Important notice and disclaimers
All information in this publication is based upon certain assumptions and analysis of information available as at the date of the publication and reflects prevailing conditions and UOB Asset Management Ltd (“UOBAM”)'s views as of such date, all of which are subject to change at any time without notice. Although care has been taken to ensure the accuracy of information contained in this publication, UOBAM makes no representation or warranty of any kind, express, implied or statutory, and shall not be responsible or liable for the accuracy or completeness of the information.
Potential investors should read the prospectus of the fund(s) (the “Fund(s)”) which is available and may be obtained from UOBAM or any of its appointed distributors, before deciding whether to subscribe for or purchase units in the Fund(s). Returns on the units are not guaranteed. The value of the units and the income from them, if any, may fall as well as rise. Please note that the graphs, charts, formulae or other devices set out or referred to in this document cannot, in and of itself, be used to determine and will not assist any person in deciding which investment product to buy or sell, or when to buy or sell an investment product. An investment in the Fund(s) is subject to investment risks and foreign exchange risks, including the possible loss of the principal amount invested. Investors should consider carefully the risks of investing in the Fund(s) and may wish to seek advice from a financial adviser before making a commitment to invest in the Fund(s). Should you choose not to seek advice from a financial adviser, you should consider carefully whether the Fund(s) is suitable for you. Investors should note that the past performance of any investment product, manager, company, entity or UOBAM mentioned in this publication, and any prediction, projection or forecast on the economy, stock market, bond market or the economic trends of the markets is not necessarily indicative of the future or likely performance of any investment product, manager, company, entity or UOBAM or the economy, stock market, bond market or economic trends of the markets. Nothing in this publication shall constitute a continuing representation or give rise to any implication that there has not been or that there will not be any change affecting the Funds. All subscription for the units in the Fund(s) must be made on the application forms accompanying the prospectus of that fund.
The above information is strictly for general information only and is not an offer, solicitation advice or recommendation to buy or sell any investment product or invest in any company. This publication should not be construed as accounting, legal, regulatory, tax, financial or other advice. Investments in unit trusts are not obligations of, deposits in, or guaranteed or insured by United Overseas Bank Limited, UOBAM, or any of their subsidiary, associate or affiliate or their distributors. The Fund(s) may use or invest in financial derivative instruments, and you should be aware of the risks associated with investments in financial derivative instruments which are described in the Fund(s)’ prospectus.
This advertisement has not been reviewed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore.
Comments