Whatever and however much stud

2021-09-21

Whatever and however much studies and analysison past statistical data performance on the market, the future will still be unpredictable and unseen by maths and science. Therefore, MS may want to prove their economic and statistical analysis by projecting a -20% will never come true. ✍?

Will the Stock Market Selloff Get Worse?Morgan Stanley and JPMorgan Chase Give Different Answers.

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Comments

We need your insight to fill this gap

Leave a comment

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"detailType":1,"isChannel":false,"data":{"magic":2,"id":860781467,"tweetId":"860781467","gmtCreate":1632213386059,"gmtModify":1676530726450,"author":{"id":4094698472251250,"authorId":4094698472251250,"authorIdStr":"4094698472251250","name":"Residue","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3007355f2105f2f9a930d32ec14fc091","vip":1,"userType":1,"introduction":"","boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[],"starInvestorFlag":false},"themes":[],"images":[],"coverImages":[],"extraTitle":"","html":"<html><head></head><body><p>Whatever and however much&nbsp;studies and analysison past statistical data performance on the market, the future will still be unpredictable and unseen by maths and science. Therefore,&nbsp;MS may want to prove their economic and statistical analysis by projecting a -20% will never come true. ✍?</p></body></html>","htmlText":"<html><head></head><body><p>Whatever and however much&nbsp;studies and analysison past statistical data performance on the market, the future will still be unpredictable and unseen by maths and science. Therefore,&nbsp;MS may want to prove their economic and statistical analysis by projecting a -20% will never come true. ✍?</p></body></html>","text":"Whatever and however much studies and analysison past statistical data performance on the market, the future will still be unpredictable and unseen by maths and science. Therefore, MS may want to prove their economic and statistical analysis by projecting a -20% will never come true. ✍?","highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/860781467","repostId":1102179356,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1102179356","pubTimestamp":1632183013,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1102179356?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-09-21 08:10","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Will the Stock Market Selloff Get Worse?Morgan Stanley and JPMorgan Chase Give Different Answers.","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1102179356","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"Morgan Stanley and JPMorgan Chase give different answers.","content":"<p><b>Morgan Stanley Sees Growing Risk of 20% Drop in S&amp;P 500</b></p>\n<ul>\n <li>Strategists say they’re turning more bearish on U.S. stocks</li>\n <li>Many Wall Street banks have said the market looks vulnerable</li>\n</ul>\n<p>A plunge of more than 20% in U.S. stocks is looking more like a real possibility, according to Morgan Stanley strategists led by Michael Wilson.</p>\n<p>While it’s still a worst-case scenario, the bank said that evidence is starting to point to weaker growth and falling consumer confidence.</p>\n<p>In a note on Monday, the strategists laid out two directions for U.S. markets, which they dubbed as “fire and ice.” In the fire outcome, the more optimistic view, the Federal Reserve pulls away stimulus to keep the economy from running too hot.</p>\n<p>“The typical ‘fire’ outcome would lead to a modest and healthy 10% correction in the S&amp;P 500,” they wrote.</p>\n<p>But it’s the more bearish “ice” scenario that’s gaining traction, the strategists said, laying out a picture in which the economy sharply decelerates and earnings get squeezed.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/391b8d559629622a1ee2f2b52bbd2284\" tg-width=\"1200\" tg-height=\"675\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>Among Wall Street strategists, Morgan Stanley is&nbsp;more bearish&nbsp;than most, but their views echo other banks that have come out with ominous predictions recently. Strategists at Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and Citigroup Inc. have also written about the potential for negative shocks to end the U.S. market’s relentless rise.</p>\n<p>“Will it be fire or ice? We don’t know, but the ice scenario would be worse for markets and we are leaning in that direction,” Morgan Stanley’s strategists wrote. “We think the mid-cycle transition will end with the rolling correction finally hitting the S&amp;P 500.”</p>\n<p>The bank recommended investors stick to defensive, quality companies to protect themselves and keep some exposure to financial stocks, which will benefit from rising interest rates.</p>\n<p><b>JPMorgan’s Kolanovic Sees Stock Rout Overdone, Urges Dip Buying</b></p>\n<ul>\n <li>Says selloff driven by technical factors amid poor liquidity</li>\n <li>Economic momentum seen picking up amid easing virus risk</li>\n</ul>\n<p>The S&amp;P 500’s worst drop in six months on Monday is an opportunity to buy stocks as the global economic recovery is poised to pick up momentum, according to JPMorgan Chase &amp; Co. strategists led by Marko Kolanovic.</p>\n<p>“The market sell-off that escalated overnight we believe is primarily driven by technical selling flows (CTAs and option hedgers) in an environment of poor liquidity, and overreaction of discretionary traders to perceived risks,” the strategists wrote in a client note. “Our fundamental thesis remains unchanged, and we see the sell-off as an opportunity to buy the dip.”</p>\n<p>Stocks sold off Monday as angst grew over China’s real-estate sector and Federal Reserve tapering. The S&amp;P 500 dropped as much as 2.5% for the biggest decline since March, extending its loss from a Sept. 2 peak to almost 5%.</p>\n<p>As the benchmark&nbsp;undercut&nbsp;its 50-day average for a second day in a row, failing to rebound from a reliable support that had been in place for the whole year, computer-driven traders like commodity trading advisers, or CTAs, stepped up selling. Volatility-targeted funds that allocate assets depending on price swings may be forced to sell as much as $40 billion of assets,warned&nbsp;Nomura Securities strategist Charlie McElligott.</p>\n<p>Kolanovic reiterated the firm’s bullish stance on equities, noting the team last week&nbsp;upgraded&nbsp;the S&amp;P 500’s year-end target by 100 points to 4,700 amid a subsiding wave of delta virus cases and better-than-expected earnings.</p>\n<p>“Risks are well-flagged and priced in, with stock multiples back at post-pandemic lows for many reopening/recovery exposures,” the strategists wrote. “We look for cyclicals to resume leadership as delta inflects.”</p>\n<p>The upbeat view contrasts with Morgan Stanley’s Mike Wilson, whose worst case called for the S&amp;P 500 to&nbsp;plunge&nbsp;more than 20% from its peak, a scenario that the strategist says looks more possible.</p>","source":"lsy1584095487587","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Will the Stock Market Selloff Get Worse?Morgan Stanley and JPMorgan Chase Give Different Answers.</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWill the Stock Market Selloff Get Worse?Morgan Stanley and JPMorgan Chase Give Different Answers.\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-09-21 08:10 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-09-20/morgan-stanley-s-wilson-sees-growing-risk-of-20-drop-in-s-p-500><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Morgan Stanley Sees Growing Risk of 20% Drop in S&P 500\n\nStrategists say they’re turning more bearish on U.S. stocks\nMany Wall Street banks have said the market looks vulnerable\n\nA plunge of more than...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-09-20/morgan-stanley-s-wilson-sees-growing-risk-of-20-drop-in-s-p-500\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-09-20/morgan-stanley-s-wilson-sees-growing-risk-of-20-drop-in-s-p-500","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1102179356","content_text":"Morgan Stanley Sees Growing Risk of 20% Drop in S&P 500\n\nStrategists say they’re turning more bearish on U.S. stocks\nMany Wall Street banks have said the market looks vulnerable\n\nA plunge of more than 20% in U.S. stocks is looking more like a real possibility, according to Morgan Stanley strategists led by Michael Wilson.\nWhile it’s still a worst-case scenario, the bank said that evidence is starting to point to weaker growth and falling consumer confidence.\nIn a note on Monday, the strategists laid out two directions for U.S. markets, which they dubbed as “fire and ice.” In the fire outcome, the more optimistic view, the Federal Reserve pulls away stimulus to keep the economy from running too hot.\n“The typical ‘fire’ outcome would lead to a modest and healthy 10% correction in the S&P 500,” they wrote.\nBut it’s the more bearish “ice” scenario that’s gaining traction, the strategists said, laying out a picture in which the economy sharply decelerates and earnings get squeezed.\n\nAmong Wall Street strategists, Morgan Stanley is more bearish than most, but their views echo other banks that have come out with ominous predictions recently. Strategists at Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and Citigroup Inc. have also written about the potential for negative shocks to end the U.S. market’s relentless rise.\n“Will it be fire or ice? We don’t know, but the ice scenario would be worse for markets and we are leaning in that direction,” Morgan Stanley’s strategists wrote. “We think the mid-cycle transition will end with the rolling correction finally hitting the S&P 500.”\nThe bank recommended investors stick to defensive, quality companies to protect themselves and keep some exposure to financial stocks, which will benefit from rising interest rates.\nJPMorgan’s Kolanovic Sees Stock Rout Overdone, Urges Dip Buying\n\nSays selloff driven by technical factors amid poor liquidity\nEconomic momentum seen picking up amid easing virus risk\n\nThe S&P 500’s worst drop in six months on Monday is an opportunity to buy stocks as the global economic recovery is poised to pick up momentum, according to JPMorgan Chase & Co. strategists led by Marko Kolanovic.\n“The market sell-off that escalated overnight we believe is primarily driven by technical selling flows (CTAs and option hedgers) in an environment of poor liquidity, and overreaction of discretionary traders to perceived risks,” the strategists wrote in a client note. “Our fundamental thesis remains unchanged, and we see the sell-off as an opportunity to buy the dip.”\nStocks sold off Monday as angst grew over China’s real-estate sector and Federal Reserve tapering. The S&P 500 dropped as much as 2.5% for the biggest decline since March, extending its loss from a Sept. 2 peak to almost 5%.\nAs the benchmark undercut its 50-day average for a second day in a row, failing to rebound from a reliable support that had been in place for the whole year, computer-driven traders like commodity trading advisers, or CTAs, stepped up selling. Volatility-targeted funds that allocate assets depending on price swings may be forced to sell as much as $40 billion of assets,warned Nomura Securities strategist Charlie McElligott.\nKolanovic reiterated the firm’s bullish stance on equities, noting the team last week upgraded the S&P 500’s year-end target by 100 points to 4,700 amid a subsiding wave of delta virus cases and better-than-expected earnings.\n“Risks are well-flagged and priced in, with stock multiples back at post-pandemic lows for many reopening/recovery exposures,” the strategists wrote. “We look for cyclicals to resume leadership as delta inflects.”\nThe upbeat view contrasts with Morgan Stanley’s Mike Wilson, whose worst case called for the S&P 500 to plunge more than 20% from its peak, a scenario that the strategist says looks more possible.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":67,"commentLimit":10,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"symbols":[],"verified":2,"subType":0,"readableState":1,"langContent":"EN","currentLanguage":"EN","warmUpFlag":false,"orderFlag":false,"shareable":true,"causeOfNotShareable":"","featuresForAnalytics":[],"commentAndTweetFlag":false,"upFlag":false,"length":242,"xxTargetLangEnum":"ORIG"},"commentList":[],"isCommentEnd":true,"isTiger":false,"isWeiXinMini":false,"url":"/m/post/860781467"}