The split in Ford ICE vs EV is-To The Moon - Tiger Brokers Online Investing Community - To The Moon

The split in Ford ICE vs EV is an example of the old way of management. Ford has always focused on short term cashflow over longer-term strategic planning. The split may help Ford temporarily gain more $ by appeasing brokers and investment capital sources, however, it shows the following will be impossible:

1. Flattening company structure

2. Higher level of integration between automotive, electrical, and computer engineers

3. Major cost reduction strategies

By specifying two separate departments; Ford is adding more complexity were none was needed. Forget all hopes of ever getting anything like the Tesla Octovalve on a Ford ICE vehicle. Or what about the integration of an air suspension reservoir in the structural cross member of a car? It is a guarantee of Ford making itself fall further behind. Ford outsources the development of electric drivetrain to LG and Magna, but it outsources Infotainment & navigation to companies like Google. There is already enough politics involved between so many companies, why add more? Is Ford that desperate for short term cash?$Ford(F)$

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Comments

We need your insight to fill this gap

Leave a comment

6

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"detailType":1,"isChannel":false,"data":{"magic":2,"id":9033534171,"tweetId":"9033534171","gmtCreate":1646311042735,"gmtModify":1676534115535,"author":{"id":3479274724739743,"idStr":"3479274724739743","authorId":3479274724739743,"authorIdStr":"3479274724739743","name":"YoungYun","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f63b3c9844fec1361496f60171c10016","vip":8,"userType":8,"introduction":"运营账号","boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[],"fanSize":38,"starInvestorFlag":false},"themes":[],"images":[],"coverImages":[],"extraTitle":"","html":"<html><head></head><body><p>The split in Ford ICE vs EV is an example of the old way of management. Ford has always focused on short term cashflow over longer-term strategic planning. The split may help Ford temporarily gain more $ by appeasing brokers and investment capital sources, however, it shows the following will be impossible:</p> <p>1. Flattening company structure</p> <p>2. Higher level of integration between automotive, electrical, and computer engineers</p> <p>3. Major cost reduction strategies</p> <p>By specifying two separate departments; Ford is adding more complexity were none was needed. Forget all hopes of ever getting anything like the Tesla Octovalve on a Ford ICE vehicle. Or what about the integration of an air suspension reservoir in the structural cross member of a car? It is a guarantee of Ford making itself fall further behind. Ford outsources the development of electric drivetrain to LG and Magna, but it outsources Infotainment &amp; navigation to companies like Google. There is already enough politics involved between so many companies, why add more? Is Ford that desperate for short term cash?<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/F\">$Ford(F)$</a> </p></body></html>","htmlText":"<html><head></head><body><p>The split in Ford ICE vs EV is an example of the old way of management. Ford has always focused on short term cashflow over longer-term strategic planning. The split may help Ford temporarily gain more $ by appeasing brokers and investment capital sources, however, it shows the following will be impossible:</p> <p>1. Flattening company structure</p> <p>2. Higher level of integration between automotive, electrical, and computer engineers</p> <p>3. Major cost reduction strategies</p> <p>By specifying two separate departments; Ford is adding more complexity were none was needed. Forget all hopes of ever getting anything like the Tesla Octovalve on a Ford ICE vehicle. Or what about the integration of an air suspension reservoir in the structural cross member of a car? It is a guarantee of Ford making itself fall further behind. Ford outsources the development of electric drivetrain to LG and Magna, but it outsources Infotainment &amp; navigation to companies like Google. There is already enough politics involved between so many companies, why add more? Is Ford that desperate for short term cash?<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/F\">$Ford(F)$</a> </p></body></html>","text":"The split in Ford ICE vs EV is an example of the old way of management. Ford has always focused on short term cashflow over longer-term strategic planning. The split may help Ford temporarily gain more $ by appeasing brokers and investment capital sources, however, it shows the following will be impossible: 1. Flattening company structure 2. Higher level of integration between automotive, electrical, and computer engineers 3. Major cost reduction strategies By specifying two separate departments; Ford is adding more complexity were none was needed. Forget all hopes of ever getting anything like the Tesla Octovalve on a Ford ICE vehicle. Or what about the integration of an air suspension reservoir in the structural cross member of a car? It is a guarantee of Ford making itself fall further behind. Ford outsources the development of electric drivetrain to LG and Magna, but it outsources Infotainment & navigation to companies like Google. There is already enough politics involved between so many companies, why add more? Is Ford that desperate for short term cash?$Ford(F)$","highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9033534171","repostId":0,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":840,"commentLimit":10,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"symbols":["F"],"verified":2,"subType":0,"readableState":1,"langContent":"EN","currentLanguage":"EN","warmUpFlag":false,"orderFlag":false,"shareable":true,"causeOfNotShareable":"","featuresForAnalytics":[],"commentAndTweetFlag":false,"andRepostAutoSelectedFlag":false,"upFlag":false,"length":913,"xxTargetLangEnum":"ORIG"},"commentList":[],"isCommentEnd":true,"isTiger":false,"isWeiXinMini":false,"url":"/m/post/9033534171"}