An objective article. Honest and concise. No beating around the bush and cloaked behind facts & figures that we all know can be crafted creatively to make things look good.

Equally important, the writer is actual owner of shares mentioned not just writer with no direct interest in the shares in question.

I share the same sentiments on Lucid in that its way overpriced now; not because the end product is not good. Rather now that the car has rolled from production line - the other pertinent factors come into full view - robustness, reliability etc.. Honestly what is the point in having a beautifully made EV car that keeps breaking right.

On Tesla, as mentioned before as long as Tesla is able to stay above the curve, ahead of its peers then perhaps the good year/s will still be there, until the playing field is levelled by other entrants. On second thoughts if he is able to keep up with the story-telling and his believers are still lapping it up - there is no telling where this might lead to still.... Hmm...

His buy-into Twitter is not a fluke and certainly not a whim-buy; although on the surface it seems so. This brillian-physcho is scheming something up his sleeves - be it another profit or ?? Whatever it is, not in the least interested.