KasonT personal page - To The Moon

KasonT

KasonT

No personal profile

11Follow

4Followers

0Topic

0Badge

2021-08-07

Ok

This Pot Stock Is the Industry's Biggest Bargain -- and I Just Bought It

2021-08-02

Good

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2021-08-02

?

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2021-08-01

Hmmm

Treasury Traders Eye Supply-Demand Risks With Yields Near Lows

2021-06-28

Great

Apple Explores Bigger iPads and Reshuffles Its Car Team

2021-06-18

Cool

1 Stock to Avoid No Matter What

2021-06-14

Hmm

ARKQ: The Technology Trade Is Dead

2021-06-08

Hmmm

Forget 'Stonks' - These 2 High-Yielding Stocks Win No Matter What

2021-06-06

Microsoft maybe

3 Technology Stocks You Can Buy and Hold for the Next Decade

2021-06-04

Awesome

Where Will Apple Stock Be In 10 Years? What To Consider

2021-06-04

Because they lose too much

Short sellers mostly held their ground as AMC shares soared

2021-06-04

Hopefully go up again

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2021-06-03

Wow

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2021-06-03

Hmm

What You Should Know About Upstart Holdings' Valuation

2021-05-23

Hmmm

Apple's Tim Cook to defend App Store at trial with Fortnite maker

2021-05-23

Hmmm

4 reasons you may want to buy Apple ahead of its annual developers conference

2021-05-21

Hmmmm

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2021-05-19

Wow

Crypto Tumble Wipes $600 Billion Off Digital Tokens in a Week

2021-05-14

Interesting, if there do so it will change a lot of things

Samsung BioLogics says no decision yet on producing Moderna's COVID-19 shot

2021-05-14

Hmmm

Array Stock Could Rise in the Long Run Despite Near-Term Uncertainty, Says J.P. Morgan

Go to Tiger App to see more news

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"userPageInfo":{"id":"3549802203532457","uuid":"3549802203532457","gmtCreate":1586708181578,"gmtModify":1711851867545,"name":"KasonT","pinyin":"kasont","introduction":"","introductionEn":"","signature":"","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/00ff9ff5035d964b869c0d61a8e87f94","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":4,"headSize":11,"tweetSize":34,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":1,"name":"萌萌虎","nameTw":"萌萌虎","represent":"呱呱坠地","factor":"评论帖子3次或发布1条主帖（非转发）","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":1,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":"success","userBadges":[{"badgeId":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493-3","templateUuid":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493","name":" Tiger Idol","description":"Join the tiger community for 1500 days","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8b40ae7da5bf081a1c84df14bf9e6367","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f160eceddd7c284a8e1136557615cfad","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/11792805c468334a9b31c39f95a41c6a","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2024.05.22","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789-1","templateUuid":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789","name":"Knowledgeable Investor","description":"Traded more than 10 stocks","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e74cc24115c4fbae6154ec1b1041bf47","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d48265cbfd97c57f9048db29f22227b0","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76c6d6898b073c77e1c537ebe9ac1c57","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2022.02.25","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1102},{"badgeId":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84-1","templateUuid":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84","name":"Real Trader","description":"Completed a transaction","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":3,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":null,"starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"post","tweets":[{"id":891950916,"gmtCreate":1628321151435,"gmtModify":1703505069457,"author":{"id":"3549802203532457","authorId":"3549802203532457","name":"KasonT","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/00ff9ff5035d964b869c0d61a8e87f94","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3549802203532457","idStr":"3549802203532457"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/891950916","repostId":"2157464672","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2157464672","pubTimestamp":1628254320,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2157464672?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-08-06 20:52","market":"us","language":"en","title":"This Pot Stock Is the Industry's Biggest Bargain -- and I Just Bought It","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2157464672","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"When compared to its peers, this marijuana stock is a no-brainer buy.","content":"<blockquote>\n When compared to its peers, this marijuana stock is a no-brainer buy.\n</blockquote>\n<p><b>Key Points</b></p>\n<ul>\n <li>The U.S. is the world's leading marijuana market.</li>\n <li>This cannabis stock has a three-state focus.</li>\n <li>Executives and insiders have skin in the game, which often bodes well for shareholders.</li>\n</ul>\n<p>There are a number of high-growth industries that could make investors rich over the remainder of the decade, such as cloud-computing, cybersecurity, and artificial intelligence. But the industry that could literally and figuratively show investors the most green might well be cannabis.</p>\n<p>Although sales estimates remain fluid, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NFC.U\">New Frontier</a> Data is looking for U.S. weed revenue to grow by 21% annually through mid-decade. This would place U.S. pot sales at $41.5 billion by 2025. Meanwhile, cannabis analytics company BDSA forecasts Canadian marijuana sales of $6.4 billion by 2026, which would more than double the $2.6 billion in legalized weed revenue recognized in 2020.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5811406aed4001edc942cb25310a21cf\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"467\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p>\n<p>Image source: Getty Images.</p>\n<p>The U.S. cannabis industry is where you'll find blazing-hot growth</p>\n<p>However, the North American pot industry has become bifurcated over time. Even though Canada has fully legalized recreational marijuana, regulatory issues have hampered industry growth since sales commenced in October 2018. Federal and provincial regulators have caused supply chain bottlenecks by delaying or slowing the retail and cultivation licensing process. Canadian pot stocks also haven't helped their cause by overextending on the capacity front and grossly overpaying for acquisitions. In other words, the Canadian pot scene has been a disaster, and it isn't clear when things will get better.</p>\n<p>On the other hand, the U.S. cannabis industry has been firing on all cylinders, even without any federal reforms. That's because 36 states have legalized medical marijuana, 18 of which have also passed legislation allowing for the consumption and/or retail sale of pot. As long as the federal government allows states to regulate their own cannabis industries, federal reform isn't mandatory for the industry to thrive.</p>\n<p>To sum things up succinctly, the U.S. cannabis market, and U.S. marijuana stocks, are where investors will want to put their money to work for the foreseeable future.</p>\n<p>This past week, I took the plunge and purchased my first U.S. pot stock, which I believe is the biggest bargain in the entire industry.</p>\n<p>Image source: Getty Images.</p>\n<p>Sometimes, great stocks come in small packages</p>\n<p>After proclaiming it <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> of the best marijuana stocks for 2021, I finally opened a position in small-cap multistate operator (MSO)<b>Jushi Holdings</b> (OTC:JUSHF) on Tuesday, Aug. 3.</p>\n<p>Why didn't I buy earlier? The best answer I can offer is The Motley Fool's transparent disclosure policy. I simply couldn't go long enough without heaping praise on Jushi Holdings in my weekly articles to add it to my own portfolio. But after sitting on my hands for roughly two weeks -- a task easier said than done -- I was able to finally take the plunge.</p>\n<p>For the time being, Jushi is a relative small fry in the MSO space. It recently opened its 20th dispensary, 13 of which are located in Pennsylvania. Based on the company's pre-announced second-quarter operating results and management commentary, the expectation is it'll open seven additional Hello/Beyond retail locations in 2021, as well as gain two more dispensaries via acquisition.</p>\n<p>For some context here,<b>Green Thumb Industries</b> (OTC:GTBIF),<b>Columbia Care</b> (OTC:CCHWF),<b>Trulieve Cannabis</b> (OTC:TCNNF), and<b>Curaleaf</b> (OTC:CURLF) respectively have 60, 95, 96, and 108 operating dispensaries nationwide. Note, the Columbia Care figure is based on pro forma data (i.e., assuming all pending acquisitions close).</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7513496d5257634cbd04a6c701ce002b\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p>\n<p>Image source: Getty Images.</p>\n<p>What makes Jushi so special is the trio of states that'll likely comprise over 80% of its revenue this year: Pennsylvania, Illinois, and Virginia. What these states share in common is their limited license issuance, with regard to cultivation and retail licenses. Pennsylvania and Illinois both cap the number of allowable dispensaries, as well as the number of stores a single business can operate. Meanwhile, Virginia assigns dispensary licenses based on jurisdiction. The point is that these states are purposely reining in competition. Though that might sound bad on the surface, it's actually great news for Jushi. By limiting competition, it should be able to effectively build up its brand awareness and garner a loyal following without being steamrolled by a larger MSO.</p>\n<p>Despite is diminutive stature (a market cap of just $816 million), Jushi hasn't been afraid to make acquisitions. For instance, in early May, Jushi closed on a deal to boost its medical marijuana production capacity in Virginia, and also acquired two dispensaries in California. The Golden State is the largest cannabis market in the world, by annual sales. Having ended June with almost $127 million in cash and short-term investments, Jushi remains well-capitalized.</p>\n<p>I also believe it's worth pointing out that of the first $250 million in capital raised by Jushi since its inception, approximately $45 million was contributed by executives and insiders. Generally speaking, when executives and insiders have skin in the game, and the interests of management align with their shareholders, good things tend to happen.</p>\n<p>&lt;&lt;&lt;图片加载中。。。&gt;&gt;&gt;</p>\n<p>Image source: Getty Images.</p>\n<p>Jushi's discount relative to its peers doesn't make sense</p>\n<p>Comparably speaking, Jushi is a mammoth value relative to its peers, in terms of sales potential and profitability. Here's a quick rundown of Wall Street's consensus sales and earnings-per-share (EPS) projections for some of the most popular MSOs by 2024.</p>\n<ul>\n <li><b>Curaleaf:</b> $3.13 billion in sales / $0.51 in EPS</li>\n <li><b>Green Thumb Industries:</b> $2 billion in sales / $1.88 in EPS</li>\n <li><b>Trulieve Cannabis:</b> $1.53 billion in sales / $2.89 in EPS</li>\n <li><b>Cresco Labs</b> (OTC:CRLBF): $1.77 billion in sales / $0.67 in EPS</li>\n <li><b>Columbia Care:</b> $1.39 billion in sales / $0.30 in EPS</li>\n</ul>\n<p>Take note that I'm not in any way degrading these five MSOs. In fact, I've been pounding the table on all but Curaleaf as attractive long-term buys. But to put this data into some context, Curaleaf, Green Thumb, Trulieve, Cresco, and Columbia Care are respectively valued at price-to-sales ratios for 2024 of 2.6, 3.3, 3.8, 1.5, and 1. In terms of price-to-earnings ratios for 2024, we're looking at 23.4, 16.5, 11.3, 16.4, and 16, respectively.</p>\n<p>Now, take a closer look at what Wall Street envisions Jushi bringing to the table by 2024:</p>\n<ul>\n <li><b>Jushi Holdings:</b> $972 million in sales / $1.42 in EPS</li>\n</ul>\n<p>Based on its current share price and market cap, we're looking at a price-to-sales ratio of 0.8 in 2024 and a P/E ratio in 2024 of just 3.4! That's how much cheaper Jushi is relative to its peers, and its relative discount doesn't make any sense.</p>\n<p>I've taken the plunge and plan to hold for years to come. Now, it's time to be patient and trust management to continue making the right moves.</p>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>This Pot Stock Is the Industry's Biggest Bargain -- and I Just Bought It</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nThis Pot Stock Is the Industry's Biggest Bargain -- and I Just Bought It\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-08-06 20:52 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/08/06/this-pot-stock-is-the-industrys-biggest-bargain/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>When compared to its peers, this marijuana stock is a no-brainer buy.\n\nKey Points\n\nThe U.S. is the world's leading marijuana market.\nThis cannabis stock has a three-state focus.\nExecutives and ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/08/06/this-pot-stock-is-the-industrys-biggest-bargain/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/08/06/this-pot-stock-is-the-industrys-biggest-bargain/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2157464672","content_text":"When compared to its peers, this marijuana stock is a no-brainer buy.\n\nKey Points\n\nThe U.S. is the world's leading marijuana market.\nThis cannabis stock has a three-state focus.\nExecutives and insiders have skin in the game, which often bodes well for shareholders.\n\nThere are a number of high-growth industries that could make investors rich over the remainder of the decade, such as cloud-computing, cybersecurity, and artificial intelligence. But the industry that could literally and figuratively show investors the most green might well be cannabis.\nAlthough sales estimates remain fluid, New Frontier Data is looking for U.S. weed revenue to grow by 21% annually through mid-decade. This would place U.S. pot sales at $41.5 billion by 2025. Meanwhile, cannabis analytics company BDSA forecasts Canadian marijuana sales of $6.4 billion by 2026, which would more than double the $2.6 billion in legalized weed revenue recognized in 2020.\n\nImage source: Getty Images.\nThe U.S. cannabis industry is where you'll find blazing-hot growth\nHowever, the North American pot industry has become bifurcated over time. Even though Canada has fully legalized recreational marijuana, regulatory issues have hampered industry growth since sales commenced in October 2018. Federal and provincial regulators have caused supply chain bottlenecks by delaying or slowing the retail and cultivation licensing process. Canadian pot stocks also haven't helped their cause by overextending on the capacity front and grossly overpaying for acquisitions. In other words, the Canadian pot scene has been a disaster, and it isn't clear when things will get better.\nOn the other hand, the U.S. cannabis industry has been firing on all cylinders, even without any federal reforms. That's because 36 states have legalized medical marijuana, 18 of which have also passed legislation allowing for the consumption and/or retail sale of pot. As long as the federal government allows states to regulate their own cannabis industries, federal reform isn't mandatory for the industry to thrive.\nTo sum things up succinctly, the U.S. cannabis market, and U.S. marijuana stocks, are where investors will want to put their money to work for the foreseeable future.\nThis past week, I took the plunge and purchased my first U.S. pot stock, which I believe is the biggest bargain in the entire industry.\nImage source: Getty Images.\nSometimes, great stocks come in small packages\nAfter proclaiming it one of the best marijuana stocks for 2021, I finally opened a position in small-cap multistate operator (MSO)Jushi Holdings (OTC:JUSHF) on Tuesday, Aug. 3.\nWhy didn't I buy earlier? The best answer I can offer is The Motley Fool's transparent disclosure policy. I simply couldn't go long enough without heaping praise on Jushi Holdings in my weekly articles to add it to my own portfolio. But after sitting on my hands for roughly two weeks -- a task easier said than done -- I was able to finally take the plunge.\nFor the time being, Jushi is a relative small fry in the MSO space. It recently opened its 20th dispensary, 13 of which are located in Pennsylvania. Based on the company's pre-announced second-quarter operating results and management commentary, the expectation is it'll open seven additional Hello/Beyond retail locations in 2021, as well as gain two more dispensaries via acquisition.\nFor some context here,Green Thumb Industries (OTC:GTBIF),Columbia Care (OTC:CCHWF),Trulieve Cannabis (OTC:TCNNF), andCuraleaf (OTC:CURLF) respectively have 60, 95, 96, and 108 operating dispensaries nationwide. Note, the Columbia Care figure is based on pro forma data (i.e., assuming all pending acquisitions close).\n\nImage source: Getty Images.\nWhat makes Jushi so special is the trio of states that'll likely comprise over 80% of its revenue this year: Pennsylvania, Illinois, and Virginia. What these states share in common is their limited license issuance, with regard to cultivation and retail licenses. Pennsylvania and Illinois both cap the number of allowable dispensaries, as well as the number of stores a single business can operate. Meanwhile, Virginia assigns dispensary licenses based on jurisdiction. The point is that these states are purposely reining in competition. Though that might sound bad on the surface, it's actually great news for Jushi. By limiting competition, it should be able to effectively build up its brand awareness and garner a loyal following without being steamrolled by a larger MSO.\nDespite is diminutive stature (a market cap of just $816 million), Jushi hasn't been afraid to make acquisitions. For instance, in early May, Jushi closed on a deal to boost its medical marijuana production capacity in Virginia, and also acquired two dispensaries in California. The Golden State is the largest cannabis market in the world, by annual sales. Having ended June with almost $127 million in cash and short-term investments, Jushi remains well-capitalized.\nI also believe it's worth pointing out that of the first $250 million in capital raised by Jushi since its inception, approximately $45 million was contributed by executives and insiders. Generally speaking, when executives and insiders have skin in the game, and the interests of management align with their shareholders, good things tend to happen.\n<<<图片加载中。。。>>>\nImage source: Getty Images.\nJushi's discount relative to its peers doesn't make sense\nComparably speaking, Jushi is a mammoth value relative to its peers, in terms of sales potential and profitability. Here's a quick rundown of Wall Street's consensus sales and earnings-per-share (EPS) projections for some of the most popular MSOs by 2024.\n\nCuraleaf: $3.13 billion in sales / $0.51 in EPS\nGreen Thumb Industries: $2 billion in sales / $1.88 in EPS\nTrulieve Cannabis: $1.53 billion in sales / $2.89 in EPS\nCresco Labs (OTC:CRLBF): $1.77 billion in sales / $0.67 in EPS\nColumbia Care: $1.39 billion in sales / $0.30 in EPS\n\nTake note that I'm not in any way degrading these five MSOs. In fact, I've been pounding the table on all but Curaleaf as attractive long-term buys. But to put this data into some context, Curaleaf, Green Thumb, Trulieve, Cresco, and Columbia Care are respectively valued at price-to-sales ratios for 2024 of 2.6, 3.3, 3.8, 1.5, and 1. In terms of price-to-earnings ratios for 2024, we're looking at 23.4, 16.5, 11.3, 16.4, and 16, respectively.\nNow, take a closer look at what Wall Street envisions Jushi bringing to the table by 2024:\n\nJushi Holdings: $972 million in sales / $1.42 in EPS\n\nBased on its current share price and market cap, we're looking at a price-to-sales ratio of 0.8 in 2024 and a P/E ratio in 2024 of just 3.4! That's how much cheaper Jushi is relative to its peers, and its relative discount doesn't make any sense.\nI've taken the plunge and plan to hold for years to come. Now, it's time to be patient and trust management to continue making the right moves.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":405,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":804094717,"gmtCreate":1627911369839,"gmtModify":1703497702603,"author":{"id":"3549802203532457","authorId":"3549802203532457","name":"KasonT","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/00ff9ff5035d964b869c0d61a8e87f94","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3549802203532457","idStr":"3549802203532457"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/804094717","repostId":"1161935562","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":276,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":804095544,"gmtCreate":1627911346888,"gmtModify":1703497701231,"author":{"id":"3549802203532457","authorId":"3549802203532457","name":"KasonT","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/00ff9ff5035d964b869c0d61a8e87f94","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3549802203532457","idStr":"3549802203532457"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"?&nbsp;","listText":"?&nbsp;","text":"?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/804095544","repostId":"1161935562","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":335,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":802779656,"gmtCreate":1627814902875,"gmtModify":1703496219153,"author":{"id":"3549802203532457","authorId":"3549802203532457","name":"KasonT","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/00ff9ff5035d964b869c0d61a8e87f94","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3549802203532457","idStr":"3549802203532457"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hmmm","listText":"Hmmm","text":"Hmmm","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/802779656","repostId":"1189883707","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1189883707","pubTimestamp":1627780975,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1189883707?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-08-01 09:22","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Treasury Traders Eye Supply-Demand Risks With Yields Near Lows","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1189883707","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"(Bloomberg) -- The timing of major upcoming shifts in Treasury supply and demand will be crucial in ","content":"<p>(Bloomberg) -- The timing of major upcoming shifts in Treasury supply and demand will be crucial in determining if the recent downward trend in yields continues or finally reverses.</p>\n<p>The 10-year yield dropped 25 basis points in July, its biggest one-month fall since the pandemic panic rocked markets back in March 2020, and a fourth straight period of declines. Commentary from the Federal Reserve accompanying its most recent policy decision last week helped reinforce the idea among some observers that it’s in no huge hurry to withdraw policy support, adding to downward pressure on yields even as inflation ticks up.</p>\n<p>The coming week will see traders turn their attention to the Treasury’s quarterly refunding announcement -- which could give clues to the supply side of the equation -- and how that’s likely to balance against any move by the Fed to dial back its asset-buying at some point down the road. Economic data such as the upcoming monthly jobs report, as always, will be key to shaping the monetary policy outlook, but the read through to markets might not be so simple.</p>\n<p>“The extent to which Treasuries will be driven by the fundamentals is as much of an unknown as the actual data itself at this stage,” BMO strategists Ian Lyngen and Ben Jeffery wrote in a note to clients.</p>\n<p>Treasury supply is expected to fall as the U.S. government eventually pares back the size of its debt auctions, and officials may give indications about the timing of that in the quarterly refunding announcement. If it’s sooner than the market is banking on, investors will face a more rapidly shrinking pile of securities, putting more downward pressure on rates. Conversely, a more leisurely schedule could move markets the other way. But even if the government is contemplating that, there’s no guarantee that the Treasury will give much visibility to investors beyond the upcoming quarter.</p>\n<p>On the flipside, one of the big sources of demand in the Treasury market is also set to be in flux, with the Fed expected to inch away from its $120 billion-a-month asset-purchase program at some point. A dovish tone from Chair Jerome Powell this week helped weigh on yields, but any sign that they’re moving faster, or that trends in inflation might force their hand on policy, could be a catalyst for a renewed uptick in rates.</p>\n<p>For Societe Generale’s Subadra Rajappa, the impact of the Fed’s pullback is likely to foster an imbalance as the pile of bonds the market has to absorb is “quite large, especially if you assume they start in November and end in mid-2022.”</p>\n<p>Most focus is likely to be on Powell himself at the late-August Jackson Hole conference, but with that event almost a month away, the market will likely be guided for now by its own judgment of what economic data means for tapering, and what the Treasury itself says about the supply side.</p>\n<p>The 10-year yield ended the week at 1.22%, close to its low for the week and more than half a percentage point below its highs for the year.</p>\n<p>What to Watch</p>\n<p>Economic calendar:Aug. 2: Markit U.S. manufacturing PMI; construction spending; ISM manufacturingAug. 3: Factory orders; durable goods ordersAug. 4: MBA mortgage applications; ADP employment change; Markit U.S. services PMI; ISM services indexAug. 5: Challenger job cuts; trade balance; initial jobless claims; Langer consumer comfortAug. 6: Nonfarm payrolls; wholesale inventories; consumer creditFed calendar:Aug. 3: Federal Reserve Governor Michelle BowmanAug. 4: Fed Vice Chair Richard ClaridaAug. 5: Fed Governor Christopher WallerAuction schedule:Aug. 2: 13-, 26-week billsAug. 3: 42-day cash management billsAug. 4: 119-day CMBsAug. 5: 4-, 8-week bills</p>","source":"lsy1584095487587","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Treasury Traders Eye Supply-Demand Risks With Yields Near Lows</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTreasury Traders Eye Supply-Demand Risks With Yields Near Lows\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-08-01 09:22 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/treasury-traders-eye-supply-demand-185500667.html><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>(Bloomberg) -- The timing of major upcoming shifts in Treasury supply and demand will be crucial in determining if the recent downward trend in yields continues or finally reverses.\nThe 10-year yield ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/treasury-traders-eye-supply-demand-185500667.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SPY":"标普500ETF",".DJI":"道琼斯",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/treasury-traders-eye-supply-demand-185500667.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1189883707","content_text":"(Bloomberg) -- The timing of major upcoming shifts in Treasury supply and demand will be crucial in determining if the recent downward trend in yields continues or finally reverses.\nThe 10-year yield dropped 25 basis points in July, its biggest one-month fall since the pandemic panic rocked markets back in March 2020, and a fourth straight period of declines. Commentary from the Federal Reserve accompanying its most recent policy decision last week helped reinforce the idea among some observers that it’s in no huge hurry to withdraw policy support, adding to downward pressure on yields even as inflation ticks up.\nThe coming week will see traders turn their attention to the Treasury’s quarterly refunding announcement -- which could give clues to the supply side of the equation -- and how that’s likely to balance against any move by the Fed to dial back its asset-buying at some point down the road. Economic data such as the upcoming monthly jobs report, as always, will be key to shaping the monetary policy outlook, but the read through to markets might not be so simple.\n“The extent to which Treasuries will be driven by the fundamentals is as much of an unknown as the actual data itself at this stage,” BMO strategists Ian Lyngen and Ben Jeffery wrote in a note to clients.\nTreasury supply is expected to fall as the U.S. government eventually pares back the size of its debt auctions, and officials may give indications about the timing of that in the quarterly refunding announcement. If it’s sooner than the market is banking on, investors will face a more rapidly shrinking pile of securities, putting more downward pressure on rates. Conversely, a more leisurely schedule could move markets the other way. But even if the government is contemplating that, there’s no guarantee that the Treasury will give much visibility to investors beyond the upcoming quarter.\nOn the flipside, one of the big sources of demand in the Treasury market is also set to be in flux, with the Fed expected to inch away from its $120 billion-a-month asset-purchase program at some point. A dovish tone from Chair Jerome Powell this week helped weigh on yields, but any sign that they’re moving faster, or that trends in inflation might force their hand on policy, could be a catalyst for a renewed uptick in rates.\nFor Societe Generale’s Subadra Rajappa, the impact of the Fed’s pullback is likely to foster an imbalance as the pile of bonds the market has to absorb is “quite large, especially if you assume they start in November and end in mid-2022.”\nMost focus is likely to be on Powell himself at the late-August Jackson Hole conference, but with that event almost a month away, the market will likely be guided for now by its own judgment of what economic data means for tapering, and what the Treasury itself says about the supply side.\nThe 10-year yield ended the week at 1.22%, close to its low for the week and more than half a percentage point below its highs for the year.\nWhat to Watch\nEconomic calendar:Aug. 2: Markit U.S. manufacturing PMI; construction spending; ISM manufacturingAug. 3: Factory orders; durable goods ordersAug. 4: MBA mortgage applications; ADP employment change; Markit U.S. services PMI; ISM services indexAug. 5: Challenger job cuts; trade balance; initial jobless claims; Langer consumer comfortAug. 6: Nonfarm payrolls; wholesale inventories; consumer creditFed calendar:Aug. 3: Federal Reserve Governor Michelle BowmanAug. 4: Fed Vice Chair Richard ClaridaAug. 5: Fed Governor Christopher WallerAuction schedule:Aug. 2: 13-, 26-week billsAug. 3: 42-day cash management billsAug. 4: 119-day CMBsAug. 5: 4-, 8-week bills","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":218,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":150343162,"gmtCreate":1624888362256,"gmtModify":1703847110403,"author":{"id":"3549802203532457","authorId":"3549802203532457","name":"KasonT","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/00ff9ff5035d964b869c0d61a8e87f94","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3549802203532457","idStr":"3549802203532457"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Great","listText":"Great","text":"Great","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/150343162","repostId":"1126982912","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1126982912","pubTimestamp":1624870223,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1126982912?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-28 16:50","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Explores Bigger iPads and Reshuffles Its Car Team","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1126982912","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"Hey everyone! Welcome to Power On, a weekly newsletter where I’m going to write about my passions—Ap","content":"<p>Hey everyone! Welcome to&nbsp;Power On, a weekly newsletter where I’m going to write about my passions—Apple, new devices and Silicon Valley secrets—with the occasional riff about my non-work obsession, the NBA. This is the inaugural edition, and be warned, I’m just getting over the Lakers playoffs loss.&nbsp;Take a look around, let me know what you think, and send your questions via&nbsp;email&nbsp;or&nbsp;Twitter.</p>\n<p><b>The Starters</b></p>\n<p>Let’s get right to the point: I wrote this newsletter on an iPad Pro. That might not sound like some shocking revelation, but trust me, I had all but relegated the tablet to video watching and light gaming duties. Since this month’s release of the iPadOS 15 beta, however, I’ve left my laptop mostly behind and have done the vast majority of my work from the iPad.</p>\n<p>Now I have even stronger feelings for what Apple Inc. needs to change about the iPad—and it goes beyond software. It’s time for a giant screen, one in the 14-inch to 16-inch range. I love the speed, touchscreen, versatility and Magic Keyboard, but the 12.9-inch display is far too small for someone accustomed to a 16-inch MacBook Pro.</p>\n<p>And I’m not the only one who thinks that: I’m told that Apple has engineers and designers exploring larger iPads that could hit stores a couple of years down the road at the earliest. They’re unlikely for next year—with Apple’s attention on a&nbsp;redesigned iPad Pro&nbsp;in the current sizes for 2022—and it’s possible they never come at all. But a big iPad would be the perfect device for many people, including me, and would continue to blur the lines between tablet and laptop.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1dfbe3939d99fa08873818e1774ac143\" tg-width=\"2000\" tg-height=\"1333\"><span>Photographer: Nina Riggio/Bloomberg</span></p>\n<p>Speaking of the iPad and Mac becoming more similar, I think Apple has absolutely moved the needle with the iPad Pro, when it comes to its software, but it still ultimately needs to allow Mac apps and Mac-like multitasking with more flexible arrangements of app windows.</p>\n<p>I’m liking the multitasking improvements so far in the iPad beta. The biggest change there for me is the ability to launch apps into split view from the home screen, rather than just from the dock. I’m digging the App Library, which is basically now the iPad version of Launchpad on the Mac.</p>\n<p>But I’d still like the ability to have four or five easily resizable and movable windows in front of me at once like I can on my Mac. Or on Windows, which just&nbsp;showed off a new version&nbsp;last week with a cleaner&nbsp;interface. And I’d like to be able to run some of my Mac apps, such as those for work, that don’t exist on the iPad. A larger iPad Pro would be the perfect place for both of those enhancements. It’s time for Apple to rip off the Band-Aid and go all in on the iPad.</p>\n<p><b>The Bench</b></p>\n<p><b>Amazon explores AR glasses and a foldable Kindle e-reader.</b>Apple’s labs in Cupertino, California, aren’t the only ones cooking up new projects. While Amazon.com Inc. is still at work on many home gadgets like&nbsp;Echos&nbsp;and a future&nbsp;home robot, it also has its eyes on mobile devices, according to a person with knowledge of the company’s explorations. That includes long-term plans for augmented reality glasses (of course, a space&nbsp;Apple plans to enter) and even internal discussion of a Kindle e-reader with a foldable screen, after&nbsp;Samsung popularized the technology.</p>\n<p><b>Apple’s App Store revenue machine keeps growing.</b>Apple continues to have several billion reasons to protect its App Store from lawmakers. The company generated $12 billion in revenue from the App Store globally in the first half of 2021, up 18% from the same period a year ago, according to estimates from Sensor Tower shared exclusively with Bloomberg Power On. That even takes into account some apps moving to a&nbsp;15% revenue share&nbsp;as part of Apple’s small business program.</p>\n<p><b>Peloton takes on the Apple Watch’s heart rate sensor.</b>Peloton Interactive Inc. is ready to move beyond bikes and treadmills and into wearables, a natural extension of the fitness technology space. The company is working on a&nbsp;heart rate monitor&nbsp;for the arm to interact with the Peloton phone app and its exercise equipment. My guess is that’s only the beginning for their wearable ambitions, though.</p>\n<p><b>Speaking of the Apple Watch, new models aplenty are coming.</b>Apple has a long roadmap ahead for the watch. On tap for this year:a bit of a redesign&nbsp;with an upgraded screen, faster processor and new wireless technology. For next year, expect a more iterative update to the flagship model that adds a body temperature sensor alongside a new Apple Watch SE and an&nbsp;explorer edition&nbsp;with a more rugged frame. A&nbsp;blood sugar monitor is further off.</p>\n<p><b>Roster Changes</b></p>\n<p>Since the project started to take shape&nbsp;around 2014, Apple’s self-driving car team has seen several leadership changes. But in 2018, it gained some management stability with the hire of Doug Field, a vice president who now runs the effort after steering Tesla Inc.’s development of the Model 3.</p>\n<p>This year, however, the car team underwent some more change: At least three top members of the group&nbsp;departed this year: Benjamin Lyon, Jaime Waydo and Dave Scott, who worked on engineering, safety systems and robotics, respectively. More recently,Apple hired Ulrich Kranz&nbsp;as a top lieutenant to Field. Kranz is an auto industry veteran who helped oversee the development of BMW’s i3 electric car and i8 hybrid&nbsp;and held leading roles at self-driving startups Canoo and Faraday Future. Kranz’s résumé isn’t exactly a slam dunk in the car world, with the BMWs being panned by some design critics and both of his startups mostly failing, but his experience reaffirms Apple’s ultimate ambitions.</p>\n<p>These weren’t the only changes to the top levels of Apple’s car team. The company has promoted some other names to the car division’s leadership as part of a reshuffle, according to members of the group.</p>\n<p>They include:</p>\n<ul>\n <li>Hanns Tappeiner, the co-founder and former president of now-defunct robotic toy car startup Anki (which was&nbsp;featured onstage at WWDC&nbsp;in 2013)</li>\n <li>Tim Cheng, who ran the car operating system team for Drive.ai, a self-driving startup&nbsp;Apple bought&nbsp;two years ago</li>\n <li>Hans Lee, who joined Apple in March after departing Freedom Robotics, a company he co-founded that creates software to control fleets of robots</li>\n <li>Martin Levihn, who now runs a group overseeing artificial intelligence-based decision making for self-driving cars</li>\n <li>Paul Costa, a longtime Apple hardware engineering manager</li>\n</ul>","source":"lsy1584095487587","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Explores Bigger iPads and Reshuffles Its Car Team</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Explores Bigger iPads and Reshuffles Its Car Team\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-06-28 16:50 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/newsletters/2021-06-27/big-ipads-apple-car-changes-amazon-ar-glasses-inside-big-tech-labs?sref=TBDibEcD><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Hey everyone! Welcome to Power On, a weekly newsletter where I’m going to write about my passions—Apple, new devices and Silicon Valley secrets—with the occasional riff about my non-work obsession, ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/newsletters/2021-06-27/big-ipads-apple-car-changes-amazon-ar-glasses-inside-big-tech-labs?sref=TBDibEcD\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/newsletters/2021-06-27/big-ipads-apple-car-changes-amazon-ar-glasses-inside-big-tech-labs?sref=TBDibEcD","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1126982912","content_text":"Hey everyone! Welcome to Power On, a weekly newsletter where I’m going to write about my passions—Apple, new devices and Silicon Valley secrets—with the occasional riff about my non-work obsession, the NBA. This is the inaugural edition, and be warned, I’m just getting over the Lakers playoffs loss. Take a look around, let me know what you think, and send your questions via email or Twitter.\nThe Starters\nLet’s get right to the point: I wrote this newsletter on an iPad Pro. That might not sound like some shocking revelation, but trust me, I had all but relegated the tablet to video watching and light gaming duties. Since this month’s release of the iPadOS 15 beta, however, I’ve left my laptop mostly behind and have done the vast majority of my work from the iPad.\nNow I have even stronger feelings for what Apple Inc. needs to change about the iPad—and it goes beyond software. It’s time for a giant screen, one in the 14-inch to 16-inch range. I love the speed, touchscreen, versatility and Magic Keyboard, but the 12.9-inch display is far too small for someone accustomed to a 16-inch MacBook Pro.\nAnd I’m not the only one who thinks that: I’m told that Apple has engineers and designers exploring larger iPads that could hit stores a couple of years down the road at the earliest. They’re unlikely for next year—with Apple’s attention on a redesigned iPad Pro in the current sizes for 2022—and it’s possible they never come at all. But a big iPad would be the perfect device for many people, including me, and would continue to blur the lines between tablet and laptop.\nPhotographer: Nina Riggio/Bloomberg\nSpeaking of the iPad and Mac becoming more similar, I think Apple has absolutely moved the needle with the iPad Pro, when it comes to its software, but it still ultimately needs to allow Mac apps and Mac-like multitasking with more flexible arrangements of app windows.\nI’m liking the multitasking improvements so far in the iPad beta. The biggest change there for me is the ability to launch apps into split view from the home screen, rather than just from the dock. I’m digging the App Library, which is basically now the iPad version of Launchpad on the Mac.\nBut I’d still like the ability to have four or five easily resizable and movable windows in front of me at once like I can on my Mac. Or on Windows, which just showed off a new version last week with a cleaner interface. And I’d like to be able to run some of my Mac apps, such as those for work, that don’t exist on the iPad. A larger iPad Pro would be the perfect place for both of those enhancements. It’s time for Apple to rip off the Band-Aid and go all in on the iPad.\nThe Bench\nAmazon explores AR glasses and a foldable Kindle e-reader.Apple’s labs in Cupertino, California, aren’t the only ones cooking up new projects. While Amazon.com Inc. is still at work on many home gadgets like Echos and a future home robot, it also has its eyes on mobile devices, according to a person with knowledge of the company’s explorations. That includes long-term plans for augmented reality glasses (of course, a space Apple plans to enter) and even internal discussion of a Kindle e-reader with a foldable screen, after Samsung popularized the technology.\nApple’s App Store revenue machine keeps growing.Apple continues to have several billion reasons to protect its App Store from lawmakers. The company generated $12 billion in revenue from the App Store globally in the first half of 2021, up 18% from the same period a year ago, according to estimates from Sensor Tower shared exclusively with Bloomberg Power On. That even takes into account some apps moving to a 15% revenue share as part of Apple’s small business program.\nPeloton takes on the Apple Watch’s heart rate sensor.Peloton Interactive Inc. is ready to move beyond bikes and treadmills and into wearables, a natural extension of the fitness technology space. The company is working on a heart rate monitor for the arm to interact with the Peloton phone app and its exercise equipment. My guess is that’s only the beginning for their wearable ambitions, though.\nSpeaking of the Apple Watch, new models aplenty are coming.Apple has a long roadmap ahead for the watch. On tap for this year:a bit of a redesign with an upgraded screen, faster processor and new wireless technology. For next year, expect a more iterative update to the flagship model that adds a body temperature sensor alongside a new Apple Watch SE and an explorer edition with a more rugged frame. A blood sugar monitor is further off.\nRoster Changes\nSince the project started to take shape around 2014, Apple’s self-driving car team has seen several leadership changes. But in 2018, it gained some management stability with the hire of Doug Field, a vice president who now runs the effort after steering Tesla Inc.’s development of the Model 3.\nThis year, however, the car team underwent some more change: At least three top members of the group departed this year: Benjamin Lyon, Jaime Waydo and Dave Scott, who worked on engineering, safety systems and robotics, respectively. More recently,Apple hired Ulrich Kranz as a top lieutenant to Field. Kranz is an auto industry veteran who helped oversee the development of BMW’s i3 electric car and i8 hybrid and held leading roles at self-driving startups Canoo and Faraday Future. Kranz’s résumé isn’t exactly a slam dunk in the car world, with the BMWs being panned by some design critics and both of his startups mostly failing, but his experience reaffirms Apple’s ultimate ambitions.\nThese weren’t the only changes to the top levels of Apple’s car team. The company has promoted some other names to the car division’s leadership as part of a reshuffle, according to members of the group.\nThey include:\n\nHanns Tappeiner, the co-founder and former president of now-defunct robotic toy car startup Anki (which was featured onstage at WWDC in 2013)\nTim Cheng, who ran the car operating system team for Drive.ai, a self-driving startup Apple bought two years ago\nHans Lee, who joined Apple in March after departing Freedom Robotics, a company he co-founded that creates software to control fleets of robots\nMartin Levihn, who now runs a group overseeing artificial intelligence-based decision making for self-driving cars\nPaul Costa, a longtime Apple hardware engineering manager","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":150,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":168115123,"gmtCreate":1623964830162,"gmtModify":1703824689705,"author":{"id":"3549802203532457","authorId":"3549802203532457","name":"KasonT","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/00ff9ff5035d964b869c0d61a8e87f94","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3549802203532457","idStr":"3549802203532457"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Cool","listText":"Cool","text":"Cool","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/168115123","repostId":"2143979397","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2143979397","pubTimestamp":1623921600,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2143979397?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-17 17:20","market":"us","language":"en","title":"1 Stock to Avoid No Matter What","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2143979397","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"This company faces an uphill climb to turning things around.","content":"<p><b>GameStop</b> (NYSE:GME) has certainly had a wild ride this year. If you owned the stock coming into 2021, it was a lot of fun watching the per-share price go from about $17 to the current $212.</p>\n<p>But you shouldn't get lulled into buying the hype surrounding this meme stock. The run was partly fueled by a Reddit group, which promoted the stock and also created a short squeeze that led the price higher. That makes for great headlines, but there are strong reasons to avoid getting pulled in.</p>\n<h2>Trying to transition</h2>\n<p>GameStop, which sells video game consoles and software, was already experiencing weakening sales heading into 2020. Same-store sales (comps) fell by 19.4% in 2019, following that up with a 9.5% drop last year.</p>\n<p>While the company was experiencing strong sales growth for a long time, the last few years have been rough. It posted negative comps in four out of the last five years. That's due in no small part to a world that is changing, and people can increasingly download games from a variety of reputable companies such as Epic Games, Steam, <b> Microsoft</b>, and <b> Sony</b>.</p>\n<p>A major investor saw an opportunity to turn around GameStop's fortunes. RC Ventures, headed by Ryan Cohen, founder of the online company <b>Chewy</b>, built a 13% ownership in the company. He is now chairman of GameStop and has made key management changes, including hiring a new CEO and CFO who previously worked for <b>Amazon</b>.</p>\n<p>Clearly, Cohen has committed his financial resources and time to making GameStop successful. While he built up impressive credentials at Chewy, which PetSmart bought for $3.4 billion (and still owns a majority stake in despite taking the company public), can he work his magic this time around?</p>\n<h2>Don't get fooled</h2>\n<p>It's a tough road to get GameStop moving in the right direction. Management didn't provide a comparable sales figure, but the fiscal first quarter's top line did increase by better than 25% to $1.3 billion for the period ended on May 1. But you shouldn't get overly excited by this impressive headline figure.</p>\n<p>It is difficult to make year-over-year comparisons since the company cut its store base by 12%. While this would make the sales growth seem more impressive, remember, GameStop was forced to close stores last year due to the pandemic. So this depressed the year-ago figure. Then, the current period benefited from Sony and Microsoft releasing new game consoles last year. This will prove to be a temporary lift since it's a <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE\">one</a>-time purchase.</p>\n<p>The company will need to follow this up with improved game sales. However, software sales were down during the period. While the company blamed this on lower used game inventory, it has gotten a boost in the past when companies released new systems. This suggests that GameStop's hope for a multi-year bounce from the new systems is already facing hurdles.</p>\n<h2>Details lacking</h2>\n<p>While the new management team has online e-commerce experience, details on a plan forward remain lacking. Undoubtedly, that is coming as the executives meet and figure out where they want to go. However, with stiff online competition, it is tough to invest in the company without knowing how it will turn itself around and get sales back to sustained profitability.</p>\n<p>That's why you should leave GameStop's shares on the shelf.</p>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>1 Stock to Avoid No Matter What</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n1 Stock to Avoid No Matter What\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-06-17 17:20 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/06/16/1-stock-to-avoid-no-matter-what-gamestop/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>GameStop (NYSE:GME) has certainly had a wild ride this year. If you owned the stock coming into 2021, it was a lot of fun watching the per-share price go from about $17 to the current $212.\nBut you ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/06/16/1-stock-to-avoid-no-matter-what-gamestop/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"GME":"游戏驿站"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/06/16/1-stock-to-avoid-no-matter-what-gamestop/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2143979397","content_text":"GameStop (NYSE:GME) has certainly had a wild ride this year. If you owned the stock coming into 2021, it was a lot of fun watching the per-share price go from about $17 to the current $212.\nBut you shouldn't get lulled into buying the hype surrounding this meme stock. The run was partly fueled by a Reddit group, which promoted the stock and also created a short squeeze that led the price higher. That makes for great headlines, but there are strong reasons to avoid getting pulled in.\nTrying to transition\nGameStop, which sells video game consoles and software, was already experiencing weakening sales heading into 2020. Same-store sales (comps) fell by 19.4% in 2019, following that up with a 9.5% drop last year.\nWhile the company was experiencing strong sales growth for a long time, the last few years have been rough. It posted negative comps in four out of the last five years. That's due in no small part to a world that is changing, and people can increasingly download games from a variety of reputable companies such as Epic Games, Steam,  Microsoft, and  Sony.\nA major investor saw an opportunity to turn around GameStop's fortunes. RC Ventures, headed by Ryan Cohen, founder of the online company Chewy, built a 13% ownership in the company. He is now chairman of GameStop and has made key management changes, including hiring a new CEO and CFO who previously worked for Amazon.\nClearly, Cohen has committed his financial resources and time to making GameStop successful. While he built up impressive credentials at Chewy, which PetSmart bought for $3.4 billion (and still owns a majority stake in despite taking the company public), can he work his magic this time around?\nDon't get fooled\nIt's a tough road to get GameStop moving in the right direction. Management didn't provide a comparable sales figure, but the fiscal first quarter's top line did increase by better than 25% to $1.3 billion for the period ended on May 1. But you shouldn't get overly excited by this impressive headline figure.\nIt is difficult to make year-over-year comparisons since the company cut its store base by 12%. While this would make the sales growth seem more impressive, remember, GameStop was forced to close stores last year due to the pandemic. So this depressed the year-ago figure. Then, the current period benefited from Sony and Microsoft releasing new game consoles last year. This will prove to be a temporary lift since it's a one-time purchase.\nThe company will need to follow this up with improved game sales. However, software sales were down during the period. While the company blamed this on lower used game inventory, it has gotten a boost in the past when companies released new systems. This suggests that GameStop's hope for a multi-year bounce from the new systems is already facing hurdles.\nDetails lacking\nWhile the new management team has online e-commerce experience, details on a plan forward remain lacking. Undoubtedly, that is coming as the executives meet and figure out where they want to go. However, with stiff online competition, it is tough to invest in the company without knowing how it will turn itself around and get sales back to sustained profitability.\nThat's why you should leave GameStop's shares on the shelf.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":190,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":185424311,"gmtCreate":1623668751233,"gmtModify":1704208195933,"author":{"id":"3549802203532457","authorId":"3549802203532457","name":"KasonT","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/00ff9ff5035d964b869c0d61a8e87f94","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3549802203532457","idStr":"3549802203532457"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hmm&nbsp;","listText":"Hmm&nbsp;","text":"Hmm","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/185424311","repostId":"1155132951","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1155132951","pubTimestamp":1623655851,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1155132951?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-14 15:30","market":"us","language":"en","title":"ARKQ: The Technology Trade Is Dead","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1155132951","media":"seekingalpha","summary":"Summary\n\nWhile 2020 was bad for most, it was a great year for technology stocks as retail investors ","content":"<p><b>Summary</b></p>\n<ul>\n <li>While 2020 was bad for most, it was a great year for technology stocks as retail investors dumped savings into the market and fueled extreme valuation growth.</li>\n <li>This first half of 2021 has seen stagnation in most equities as investors lack cash and borrowing capacity to continue to make purchases.</li>\n <li>As the repurchase market sucks liquidity back out of the system, I suspect that valuations will revert to the mean as hyped-up firms face a harsh reality check.</li>\n <li>ARK Invests ARKQ may face considerable declines as the fund currently has a very high weighted average forward \"P/E\" of around 46X.</li>\n <li>ARKQ's losses could be substantial if top holdings like Tesla continue to face negative real-world trends.</li>\n</ul>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c5994f43dbb6bc58f09b1735599cc91c\" tg-width=\"768\" tg-height=\"512\"><span>Adrian Los/iStock via Getty Images</span></p>\n<p>The past year has seen an intense acceleration in the hype surrounding technology companies. Indeed, futuristic technology firms appear to benefit from crises as they offer a place to reserve hope for a better and brighter future. Since January of 2020, the Nasdaq 100 has risen 60%, while thematic funds such as the ARK Autonomous Technology &amp; Robotics ETF(BATS:ARKQ)have more than doubled in value.</p>\n<p>However, the first half of 2021 has seen a potential peak to this hype as ARKQ, and most equities in general, remain virtually unchanged. With valuations, investor margin debt, and \"meme stock mania\" at record levels, investors may want to seriously consider the possibility that the technology bubble is reaching its end. In my view, Bitcoin's recent losses may be an initial \"canary in the coal mine\" that proceeds a much larger crash. While no human can unequivocally time the market, history gifts us with many signals and patterns which are correlated with market peaks.</p>\n<p><b>Market Mania Is Bound By Liquidity</b></p>\n<p>Those who have read some of my recent articles have likely seen the chart below. That said, it seems important that this information be relayed to as many investors as possible. We are currently seeing a combination of factors that set up the scene for an extreme decline in the stock market. Most notably, low cash levels in individual investor's accounts, record margin debt, and near-record valuations (record valuations accounting for other factors). This situation is generally similar to that of 1999-2000, which proceed a 90% decline in the Nasdaq 100. See below:</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/772c8c15de8609a9ac61e048226bca75\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"453\"><span>Data by YCharts</span></p>\n<p>The CAPE ratio is slightly below the 1999-2000 levels. That said, if we account for the fact that corporate debt levels are far higher and that profit margins higher than normal (and on a rapid decline due to labor and commodity shortages), it is clear to me that the stock market has never been as expensive as it is today.</p>\n<p>While many believe \"fundamentals no longer matter,\" individual investors lack the cash and borrowing capacity to continue to buy stocks. As such, a small decline in the market could easily turn into a period of rapid selling due to a cascade of negative liquidity impacts. Additionally, as we see in the repurchase agreement market, U.S banks have lent to their capacity, so they are being forced tosend money back to the Federal Reserve.</p>\n<p>Simply put, there are no longer any significant sources of cash that can go into stocks. Thus, even if fundamentals are disregarded today, the fuel (i.e., cash, liquidity) needed to push stocks higher has run dry. Considering it is unlikely the U.S government will give out additional cash stimulus anytime soon, corporate fundamentals will matter as profits are the last remaining source of liquidity.</p>\n<p>If we see a crash sometime this year, I believe that technology stocks have the most to decline. Particularly those with the most thematic hype, such as [ARKQ] - though most other ARK funds are equally at-risk. The primary reasons are that the stocks within these funds are subject to extreme hype, which has pushed their valuations to untenable levels. Secondly, because many of ARKQ's holdings are subject to immense speculation, their valuations are largely dependent on margin debt, which means they are at high risk of suffering a flash crash. Let's take a closer look.</p>\n<p><b>Time For a Reality Check On Technology</b></p>\n<p>The overall aim of ARKQ is to invest in companies that are expected to benefit from technological and scientific innovation in energy, automation, manufacturing, materials, and transportation. Major industries which include target this theme include autonomous vehicles, robotics, 3D printing, energy storage, and space exploration. Put simply, ARKQ invests in the typical futuristic dream which is held by many today. Through this, the fund allows its investors to feel that they are members in building a better and brighter future.</p>\n<p>Humans are generally attracted to such altruism, but unfortunately, the market system under which we operate favors the bottom line, at least in the long run. I emphasize the long run because it is also the case that financial markets are one of the only outlets where irrationality can breed itself. As a stock surpasses its \"fundamental fair value,\" those withirrational exuberanceappear prophetic, while those focusing on the bottom line numbers appear to be wrong. This encourages investors to shift toward irrational exuberance and away from the hard data - causing valuations to rise ever higher based almost entirely on psychological grounds (as opposed to reality).</p>\n<p>To illustrate, I've gathered the forward EPS expectations for all of ARKQ's holdings and calculated their forward earnings yield. See below:</p>\n<table>\n <tbody>\n  <tr>\n   <td><b>Ticker</b></td>\n   <td><b>Name</b></td>\n   <td><b>Price</b></td>\n   <td><b>Forward EPS</b></td>\n   <td><b>FWD Earnings Yield</b></td>\n   <td><b>ETF Weight</b></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>(NASDAQ:TSLA)</td>\n   <td>Tesla Inc</td>\n   <td>$603.75</td>\n   <td>$4.58</td>\n   <td>0.76%</td>\n   <td>10.14%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>(NASDAQ:TRMB)</td>\n   <td>Trimble Inc</td>\n   <td>$79.30</td>\n   <td>$2.44</td>\n   <td>3.08%</td>\n   <td>6.33%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>(NASDAQ:JD)</td>\n   <td>JD.Com Inc</td>\n   <td>$71.58</td>\n   <td>$1.63</td>\n   <td>2.28%</td>\n   <td>6.29%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>(NASDAQ:KTOS)</td>\n   <td>Kratos Defense &amp; Security Solutions, Inc</td>\n   <td>$26.21</td>\n   <td>$0.36</td>\n   <td>1.37%</td>\n   <td>5.95%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>(NASDAQ:GOOG)</td>\n   <td>Alphabet Inc Class C</td>\n   <td>$2,510.77</td>\n   <td>$87.28</td>\n   <td>3.48%</td>\n   <td>4.90%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>(NASDAQ:BIDU)</td>\n   <td>Baidu Inc ADR Class A</td>\n   <td>$188.41</td>\n   <td>$9.66</td>\n   <td>5.13%</td>\n   <td>4.35%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>(NASDAQ:IRDM)</td>\n   <td>Iridium Communications Inc</td>\n   <td>$39.48</td>\n   <td>-$0.15</td>\n   <td>-0.38%</td>\n   <td>3.95%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>(NYSE:U)</td>\n   <td>Unity Software Inc</td>\n   <td>$100.93</td>\n   <td>-$0.34</td>\n   <td>-0.34%</td>\n   <td>3.16%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>(NYSE:LMT)</td>\n   <td>Lockheed Martin Corporation</td>\n   <td>$386.92</td>\n   <td>$26.66</td>\n   <td>6.89%</td>\n   <td>2.92%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>(NASDAQ:TER)</td>\n   <td>Teradyne, Inc.</td>\n   <td>$127.61</td>\n   <td>$5.34</td>\n   <td>4.18%</td>\n   <td>2.88%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>(NYSE:DDD)</td>\n   <td>3D Systems Corporation</td>\n   <td>$30.70</td>\n   <td>$0.37</td>\n   <td>1.21%</td>\n   <td>2.82%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>(NASDAQ:NXPI)</td>\n   <td>NXP Semiconductors NV</td>\n   <td>$200.28</td>\n   <td>$9.66</td>\n   <td>4.82%</td>\n   <td>2.77%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>(OTCPK:KMTUY)</td>\n   <td>Komatsu Ltd</td>\n   <td>$28.02</td>\n   <td>$1.67</td>\n   <td>5.96%</td>\n   <td>2.74%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>(NASDAQ:NIU)</td>\n   <td>Niu Technologies - ADR</td>\n   <td>$33.92</td>\n   <td>$0.64</td>\n   <td>1.89%</td>\n   <td>2.67%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>(NYSE:DE)</td>\n   <td>Deere &amp; Company</td>\n   <td>$341.67</td>\n   <td>$18.00</td>\n   <td>5.27%</td>\n   <td>2.64%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>(NASDAQ:NNDM)</td>\n   <td>Nano Dimension Ltd - ADR</td>\n   <td>$7.87</td>\n   <td>-$0.26</td>\n   <td>-3.30%</td>\n   <td>2.08%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>(OTCPK:BYDDY)</td>\n   <td>BYD Company ADR</td>\n   <td>$55.21</td>\n   <td>$0.49</td>\n   <td>0.90%</td>\n   <td>1.97%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>(NYSE:CAT)</td>\n   <td>Caterpillar Inc.</td>\n   <td>$223.21</td>\n   <td>$9.86</td>\n   <td>4.42%</td>\n   <td>1.97%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>(NYSE:PATH)</td>\n   <td>UiPath Inc</td>\n   <td>$72.50</td>\n   <td>-$0.07</td>\n   <td>-0.10%</td>\n   <td>1.89%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>(NASDAQ:RAVN)</td>\n   <td>Raven Industries, Inc.</td>\n   <td>$42.93</td>\n   <td>$0.80</td>\n   <td>1.86%</td>\n   <td>1.87%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>(NYSE:MGA)</td>\n   <td>Magna International Inc.</td>\n   <td>$98.60</td>\n   <td>$7.57</td>\n   <td>7.68%</td>\n   <td>1.86%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>(NASDAQ:MTLS)</td>\n   <td>Materialise NV</td>\n   <td>$23.25</td>\n   <td>-$0.10</td>\n   <td>-0.43%</td>\n   <td>1.52%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>(NASDAQ:ISRG)</td>\n   <td>Intuitive Surgical, Inc.</td>\n   <td>$860.02</td>\n   <td>$13.47</td>\n   <td>1.57%</td>\n   <td>1.50%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>(NASDAQ:AVAV)</td>\n   <td>AeroVironment, Inc.</td>\n   <td>$111.77</td>\n   <td>$1.87</td>\n   <td>1.67%</td>\n   <td>1.45%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>(NASDAQ:VUZI)</td>\n   <td>Vuzix Corp</td>\n   <td>$18.93</td>\n   <td>-$0.39</td>\n   <td>-2.06%</td>\n   <td>1.41%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>(NASDAQ:NVDA)</td>\n   <td>NVIDIA Corporation</td>\n   <td>$707.69</td>\n   <td>$15.87</td>\n   <td>2.24%</td>\n   <td>1.41%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>(NYSE:TDY)</td>\n   <td>Teledyne Technologies Incorporated</td>\n   <td>$423.43</td>\n   <td>$11.23</td>\n   <td>2.65%</td>\n   <td>1.31%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>(NASDAQ:TSP)</td>\n   <td>Tusimple Holdings Inc</td>\n   <td>$47.22</td>\n   <td>-$2.08</td>\n   <td>-4.40%</td>\n   <td>1.27%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>(NASDAQ:TWOU)</td>\n   <td>2U Inc</td>\n   <td>$39.19</td>\n   <td>-$0.37</td>\n   <td>-0.94%</td>\n   <td>1.19%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>(OTCPK:TCEHY)</td>\n   <td>Tencent Holdings ADR</td>\n   <td>$77.07</td>\n   <td>$2.80</td>\n   <td>3.63%</td>\n   <td>1.19%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>(NASDAQ:ESLT)</td>\n   <td>Elbit Systems Ltd</td>\n   <td>$131.24</td>\n   <td>$5.88</td>\n   <td>4.48%</td>\n   <td>1.19%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>(NASDAQ:SNPS)</td>\n   <td>Synopsys, Inc.</td>\n   <td>$263.48</td>\n   <td>$6.48</td>\n   <td>2.46%</td>\n   <td>1.16%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>(NASDAQ:ANSS)</td>\n   <td>ANSYS, Inc.</td>\n   <td>$337.81</td>\n   <td>$6.96</td>\n   <td>2.06%</td>\n   <td>1.05%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>(NYSE:ACIC)</td>\n   <td>Atlas Crest Investment Corp</td>\n   <td>$10.03</td>\n   <td>$0.00</td>\n   <td>0.00%</td>\n   <td>1.04%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>(NASDAQ:PCAR)</td>\n   <td>PACCAR Inc</td>\n   <td>$91.96</td>\n   <td>$5.89</td>\n   <td>6.40%</td>\n   <td>0.96%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>(NYSE:SPFR)</td>\n   <td>Jaws Spitfire Acquisition Corp</td>\n   <td>$10.07</td>\n   <td>$0.00</td>\n   <td>0.00%</td>\n   <td>0.94%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>(NYSE:BABA)</td>\n   <td>Alibaba Group Holding Ltd - ADR</td>\n   <td>$212.25</td>\n   <td>$10.19</td>\n   <td>4.80%</td>\n   <td>0.94%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>(NASDAQ:BLDE)</td>\n   <td>Blade Air Mobility Inc</td>\n   <td>$10.41</td>\n   <td>$0.00</td>\n   <td>0.00%</td>\n   <td>0.90%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>(NASDAQ:SSYS)</td>\n   <td>Stratasys Ltd</td>\n   <td>$23.27</td>\n   <td>-$0.24</td>\n   <td>-1.03%</td>\n   <td>0.89%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>(NYSE:AONE)</td>\n   <td>one</td>\n   <td>$10.15</td>\n   <td>$0.00</td>\n   <td>0.00%</td>\n   <td>0.75%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>(NYSE:PRLB)</td>\n   <td>Proto Labs Inc</td>\n   <td>$88.53</td>\n   <td>$1.83</td>\n   <td>2.07%</td>\n   <td>0.59%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>(NASDAQ:XONE)</td>\n   <td>ExOne Co</td>\n   <td>$21.80</td>\n   <td>-$0.98</td>\n   <td>-4.50%</td>\n   <td>0.58%</td>\n  </tr>\n </tbody>\n</table>\n<p><i>(Sources:Ark Invest, Seeking Alpha Earnings Data)</i></p>\n<p>Note, I did exclude the two smallest positions within ARKQ's current holdings list as reliable data could not be found for those firms, and they made up tiny portions of ARKQ's assets. Also, I assigned the minor SPAC positions with zero EPS.</p>\n<p>Overall, these holdings have a median forward \"P/E\" ratio of 53X. ARKQ's current weighted-average earnings yield is 2.16%, giving the fund a high forward \"P/E\" of 46X. There are a few other interesting qualities to note about ARKQ's holdings. The fund's largest holdings are generally older, more profitable companies with smaller growth potential. The \"tail\" of its holdings is made up of usually much smaller firms with negative profits and hypothetically greater growth potential. The larger industrial firms offer some protection in case of a large technology crash, but I still estimate the downside risk of ARKQ is quite high.</p>\n<p>Since the 1800'smost equities have usually carried a \"P/E\" ratio of around 15X. This figure usually ranges from 5X-20X depending on the market's cycle. Obviously, valuations are usually higher for those stocks with greater long-term earnings growth potential. While this is slightly accounted for by using forward EPS indeed, ARKQ can still logically command a higher valuation since its holdings<i>should</i>grow at an above-market pace for multiple years.</p>\n<p>Even still, if we say ARKQ's \"fair value\" forward weighted-average FWS \"P/E\" is 30X (a<i>historically</i>high figure), then the fund is overvalued by roughly 52%. In other words, to reach the estimated fair value, ARKQ should fall to $53, which would be a 35% decline. That said, if extreme margin debt levels cause a liquidity crisis among retail investors, as I suspect, then ARKQ could fall much further. It is also possible that the earnings outlooks of these firms are over-exaggerated, considering major firms in ARKW like Tesla are experiencingsubstantial and unexpected demand declines.</p>\n<p><b>The Bottom Line</b></p>\n<p>Overall, I would avoid ARKQ as it seems likely that the fund's recent declines may accelerate over the coming months. I am bearish not only because most of its holdings appear to be considerably overvalued, but more importantly because the fuel which has allowed it to become so rich is quickly running dry. In my opinion, this sets the scene for a potential large decline across the stock market.</p>\n<p>The past year has made it clear that equities can rise substantially if individual investors have the cash (or borrowing capacity) to make purchases. Many used stimulus checks, COVID savings, etc., to invest in the market. Today, most investors have little cash on the sidelines and substantial margin debt. Without this fuel, stocks have generally been unable to rise. As we advance, as the repurchase marketsucks liquidity out of the financial system, I believe this period stagnation will likely turn into a period of potentially rapid declines.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>ARKQ: The Technology Trade Is Dead</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nARKQ: The Technology Trade Is Dead\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-06-14 15:30 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4434406-arkq-the-technology-trade-is-dead><strong>seekingalpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Summary\n\nWhile 2020 was bad for most, it was a great year for technology stocks as retail investors dumped savings into the market and fueled extreme valuation growth.\nThis first half of 2021 has seen...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4434406-arkq-the-technology-trade-is-dead\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"ARKQ":"ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4434406-arkq-the-technology-trade-is-dead","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1155132951","content_text":"Summary\n\nWhile 2020 was bad for most, it was a great year for technology stocks as retail investors dumped savings into the market and fueled extreme valuation growth.\nThis first half of 2021 has seen stagnation in most equities as investors lack cash and borrowing capacity to continue to make purchases.\nAs the repurchase market sucks liquidity back out of the system, I suspect that valuations will revert to the mean as hyped-up firms face a harsh reality check.\nARK Invests ARKQ may face considerable declines as the fund currently has a very high weighted average forward \"P/E\" of around 46X.\nARKQ's losses could be substantial if top holdings like Tesla continue to face negative real-world trends.\n\nAdrian Los/iStock via Getty Images\nThe past year has seen an intense acceleration in the hype surrounding technology companies. Indeed, futuristic technology firms appear to benefit from crises as they offer a place to reserve hope for a better and brighter future. Since January of 2020, the Nasdaq 100 has risen 60%, while thematic funds such as the ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF(BATS:ARKQ)have more than doubled in value.\nHowever, the first half of 2021 has seen a potential peak to this hype as ARKQ, and most equities in general, remain virtually unchanged. With valuations, investor margin debt, and \"meme stock mania\" at record levels, investors may want to seriously consider the possibility that the technology bubble is reaching its end. In my view, Bitcoin's recent losses may be an initial \"canary in the coal mine\" that proceeds a much larger crash. While no human can unequivocally time the market, history gifts us with many signals and patterns which are correlated with market peaks.\nMarket Mania Is Bound By Liquidity\nThose who have read some of my recent articles have likely seen the chart below. That said, it seems important that this information be relayed to as many investors as possible. We are currently seeing a combination of factors that set up the scene for an extreme decline in the stock market. Most notably, low cash levels in individual investor's accounts, record margin debt, and near-record valuations (record valuations accounting for other factors). This situation is generally similar to that of 1999-2000, which proceed a 90% decline in the Nasdaq 100. See below:\nData by YCharts\nThe CAPE ratio is slightly below the 1999-2000 levels. That said, if we account for the fact that corporate debt levels are far higher and that profit margins higher than normal (and on a rapid decline due to labor and commodity shortages), it is clear to me that the stock market has never been as expensive as it is today.\nWhile many believe \"fundamentals no longer matter,\" individual investors lack the cash and borrowing capacity to continue to buy stocks. As such, a small decline in the market could easily turn into a period of rapid selling due to a cascade of negative liquidity impacts. Additionally, as we see in the repurchase agreement market, U.S banks have lent to their capacity, so they are being forced tosend money back to the Federal Reserve.\nSimply put, there are no longer any significant sources of cash that can go into stocks. Thus, even if fundamentals are disregarded today, the fuel (i.e., cash, liquidity) needed to push stocks higher has run dry. Considering it is unlikely the U.S government will give out additional cash stimulus anytime soon, corporate fundamentals will matter as profits are the last remaining source of liquidity.\nIf we see a crash sometime this year, I believe that technology stocks have the most to decline. Particularly those with the most thematic hype, such as [ARKQ] - though most other ARK funds are equally at-risk. The primary reasons are that the stocks within these funds are subject to extreme hype, which has pushed their valuations to untenable levels. Secondly, because many of ARKQ's holdings are subject to immense speculation, their valuations are largely dependent on margin debt, which means they are at high risk of suffering a flash crash. Let's take a closer look.\nTime For a Reality Check On Technology\nThe overall aim of ARKQ is to invest in companies that are expected to benefit from technological and scientific innovation in energy, automation, manufacturing, materials, and transportation. Major industries which include target this theme include autonomous vehicles, robotics, 3D printing, energy storage, and space exploration. Put simply, ARKQ invests in the typical futuristic dream which is held by many today. Through this, the fund allows its investors to feel that they are members in building a better and brighter future.\nHumans are generally attracted to such altruism, but unfortunately, the market system under which we operate favors the bottom line, at least in the long run. I emphasize the long run because it is also the case that financial markets are one of the only outlets where irrationality can breed itself. As a stock surpasses its \"fundamental fair value,\" those withirrational exuberanceappear prophetic, while those focusing on the bottom line numbers appear to be wrong. This encourages investors to shift toward irrational exuberance and away from the hard data - causing valuations to rise ever higher based almost entirely on psychological grounds (as opposed to reality).\nTo illustrate, I've gathered the forward EPS expectations for all of ARKQ's holdings and calculated their forward earnings yield. See below:\n\n\n\nTicker\nName\nPrice\nForward EPS\nFWD Earnings Yield\nETF Weight\n\n\n(NASDAQ:TSLA)\nTesla Inc\n$603.75\n$4.58\n0.76%\n10.14%\n\n\n(NASDAQ:TRMB)\nTrimble Inc\n$79.30\n$2.44\n3.08%\n6.33%\n\n\n(NASDAQ:JD)\nJD.Com Inc\n$71.58\n$1.63\n2.28%\n6.29%\n\n\n(NASDAQ:KTOS)\nKratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc\n$26.21\n$0.36\n1.37%\n5.95%\n\n\n(NASDAQ:GOOG)\nAlphabet Inc Class C\n$2,510.77\n$87.28\n3.48%\n4.90%\n\n\n(NASDAQ:BIDU)\nBaidu Inc ADR Class A\n$188.41\n$9.66\n5.13%\n4.35%\n\n\n(NASDAQ:IRDM)\nIridium Communications Inc\n$39.48\n-$0.15\n-0.38%\n3.95%\n\n\n(NYSE:U)\nUnity Software Inc\n$100.93\n-$0.34\n-0.34%\n3.16%\n\n\n(NYSE:LMT)\nLockheed Martin Corporation\n$386.92\n$26.66\n6.89%\n2.92%\n\n\n(NASDAQ:TER)\nTeradyne, Inc.\n$127.61\n$5.34\n4.18%\n2.88%\n\n\n(NYSE:DDD)\n3D Systems Corporation\n$30.70\n$0.37\n1.21%\n2.82%\n\n\n(NASDAQ:NXPI)\nNXP Semiconductors NV\n$200.28\n$9.66\n4.82%\n2.77%\n\n\n(OTCPK:KMTUY)\nKomatsu Ltd\n$28.02\n$1.67\n5.96%\n2.74%\n\n\n(NASDAQ:NIU)\nNiu Technologies - ADR\n$33.92\n$0.64\n1.89%\n2.67%\n\n\n(NYSE:DE)\nDeere & Company\n$341.67\n$18.00\n5.27%\n2.64%\n\n\n(NASDAQ:NNDM)\nNano Dimension Ltd - ADR\n$7.87\n-$0.26\n-3.30%\n2.08%\n\n\n(OTCPK:BYDDY)\nBYD Company ADR\n$55.21\n$0.49\n0.90%\n1.97%\n\n\n(NYSE:CAT)\nCaterpillar Inc.\n$223.21\n$9.86\n4.42%\n1.97%\n\n\n(NYSE:PATH)\nUiPath Inc\n$72.50\n-$0.07\n-0.10%\n1.89%\n\n\n(NASDAQ:RAVN)\nRaven Industries, Inc.\n$42.93\n$0.80\n1.86%\n1.87%\n\n\n(NYSE:MGA)\nMagna International Inc.\n$98.60\n$7.57\n7.68%\n1.86%\n\n\n(NASDAQ:MTLS)\nMaterialise NV\n$23.25\n-$0.10\n-0.43%\n1.52%\n\n\n(NASDAQ:ISRG)\nIntuitive Surgical, Inc.\n$860.02\n$13.47\n1.57%\n1.50%\n\n\n(NASDAQ:AVAV)\nAeroVironment, Inc.\n$111.77\n$1.87\n1.67%\n1.45%\n\n\n(NASDAQ:VUZI)\nVuzix Corp\n$18.93\n-$0.39\n-2.06%\n1.41%\n\n\n(NASDAQ:NVDA)\nNVIDIA Corporation\n$707.69\n$15.87\n2.24%\n1.41%\n\n\n(NYSE:TDY)\nTeledyne Technologies Incorporated\n$423.43\n$11.23\n2.65%\n1.31%\n\n\n(NASDAQ:TSP)\nTusimple Holdings Inc\n$47.22\n-$2.08\n-4.40%\n1.27%\n\n\n(NASDAQ:TWOU)\n2U Inc\n$39.19\n-$0.37\n-0.94%\n1.19%\n\n\n(OTCPK:TCEHY)\nTencent Holdings ADR\n$77.07\n$2.80\n3.63%\n1.19%\n\n\n(NASDAQ:ESLT)\nElbit Systems Ltd\n$131.24\n$5.88\n4.48%\n1.19%\n\n\n(NASDAQ:SNPS)\nSynopsys, Inc.\n$263.48\n$6.48\n2.46%\n1.16%\n\n\n(NASDAQ:ANSS)\nANSYS, Inc.\n$337.81\n$6.96\n2.06%\n1.05%\n\n\n(NYSE:ACIC)\nAtlas Crest Investment Corp\n$10.03\n$0.00\n0.00%\n1.04%\n\n\n(NASDAQ:PCAR)\nPACCAR Inc\n$91.96\n$5.89\n6.40%\n0.96%\n\n\n(NYSE:SPFR)\nJaws Spitfire Acquisition Corp\n$10.07\n$0.00\n0.00%\n0.94%\n\n\n(NYSE:BABA)\nAlibaba Group Holding Ltd - ADR\n$212.25\n$10.19\n4.80%\n0.94%\n\n\n(NASDAQ:BLDE)\nBlade Air Mobility Inc\n$10.41\n$0.00\n0.00%\n0.90%\n\n\n(NASDAQ:SSYS)\nStratasys Ltd\n$23.27\n-$0.24\n-1.03%\n0.89%\n\n\n(NYSE:AONE)\none\n$10.15\n$0.00\n0.00%\n0.75%\n\n\n(NYSE:PRLB)\nProto Labs Inc\n$88.53\n$1.83\n2.07%\n0.59%\n\n\n(NASDAQ:XONE)\nExOne Co\n$21.80\n-$0.98\n-4.50%\n0.58%\n\n\n\n(Sources:Ark Invest, Seeking Alpha Earnings Data)\nNote, I did exclude the two smallest positions within ARKQ's current holdings list as reliable data could not be found for those firms, and they made up tiny portions of ARKQ's assets. Also, I assigned the minor SPAC positions with zero EPS.\nOverall, these holdings have a median forward \"P/E\" ratio of 53X. ARKQ's current weighted-average earnings yield is 2.16%, giving the fund a high forward \"P/E\" of 46X. There are a few other interesting qualities to note about ARKQ's holdings. The fund's largest holdings are generally older, more profitable companies with smaller growth potential. The \"tail\" of its holdings is made up of usually much smaller firms with negative profits and hypothetically greater growth potential. The larger industrial firms offer some protection in case of a large technology crash, but I still estimate the downside risk of ARKQ is quite high.\nSince the 1800'smost equities have usually carried a \"P/E\" ratio of around 15X. This figure usually ranges from 5X-20X depending on the market's cycle. Obviously, valuations are usually higher for those stocks with greater long-term earnings growth potential. While this is slightly accounted for by using forward EPS indeed, ARKQ can still logically command a higher valuation since its holdingsshouldgrow at an above-market pace for multiple years.\nEven still, if we say ARKQ's \"fair value\" forward weighted-average FWS \"P/E\" is 30X (ahistoricallyhigh figure), then the fund is overvalued by roughly 52%. In other words, to reach the estimated fair value, ARKQ should fall to $53, which would be a 35% decline. That said, if extreme margin debt levels cause a liquidity crisis among retail investors, as I suspect, then ARKQ could fall much further. It is also possible that the earnings outlooks of these firms are over-exaggerated, considering major firms in ARKW like Tesla are experiencingsubstantial and unexpected demand declines.\nThe Bottom Line\nOverall, I would avoid ARKQ as it seems likely that the fund's recent declines may accelerate over the coming months. I am bearish not only because most of its holdings appear to be considerably overvalued, but more importantly because the fuel which has allowed it to become so rich is quickly running dry. In my opinion, this sets the scene for a potential large decline across the stock market.\nThe past year has made it clear that equities can rise substantially if individual investors have the cash (or borrowing capacity) to make purchases. Many used stimulus checks, COVID savings, etc., to invest in the market. Today, most investors have little cash on the sidelines and substantial margin debt. Without this fuel, stocks have generally been unable to rise. As we advance, as the repurchase marketsucks liquidity out of the financial system, I believe this period stagnation will likely turn into a period of potentially rapid declines.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":351,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":117735097,"gmtCreate":1623160315419,"gmtModify":1704197360566,"author":{"id":"3549802203532457","authorId":"3549802203532457","name":"KasonT","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/00ff9ff5035d964b869c0d61a8e87f94","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3549802203532457","idStr":"3549802203532457"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hmmm","listText":"Hmmm","text":"Hmmm","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/117735097","repostId":"1114060161","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1114060161","pubTimestamp":1623152991,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1114060161?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-08 19:49","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Forget 'Stonks' - These 2 High-Yielding Stocks Win No Matter What","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1114060161","media":"seekingalpha","summary":"Summary\n\nIncreasingly many investors are chasing quick gains by investing in meme stocks like AMC an","content":"<p><b>Summary</b></p>\n<ul>\n <li>Increasingly many investors are chasing quick gains by investing in meme stocks like AMC and GameStop.</li>\n <li>Instead of treating the stock market as a casino, we would strongly advise you to exercise more caution when investing your hard-earned money.</li>\n <li>Slow and steady wins the race in the long run. We present two high-yielding stocks that we expect to do far better over time.</li>\n</ul>\n<p>As I write this article, there's a monster rally that's happening in some of the most popular Reddit \"meme stocks\" or \"stonks\" as many like to call them.</p>\n<p>Over the past 10 days:</p>\n<ul>\n <li>AMC (AMC) is up 354%</li>\n <li>GameStop (GME) is up 57%</li>\n <li>BlackBerry (BB) is up 77%</li>\n <li>Bed Bath &amp; Beyond (BBBY) is up 86%</li>\n <li>Koss (KOSS) is up 140%</li>\n</ul>\n<blockquote>\n <b>What do all these companies have in common?</b>\n</blockquote>\n<p>They're heavily shorted.</p>\n<p>Their businesses have been on a decline for a while.</p>\n<p>But suddenly, they started surging after gaining the interest from retail investors on the subreddit group wallstreetbets.</p>\n<p>By now, the group has more than 10 million users, posting memes, but also occasionally research, on these companies, promoting them as \"short-squeeze\" opportunities.</p>\n<p>We all saw what happened with GameStop earlier this year, and they're now attempting to recreate similar short-squeezes with these other stocks:</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8e24f9e1abb66dd5f3c2d9198ec5a53d\" tg-width=\"310\" tg-height=\"436\">Their memes are quite funny, but remember that memes are not meant to be financial advice.</p>\n<p>With AMC surging by 100% in a single day, I have had surprisingly many people here on Seeking Alpha ask me:<i>\"Is it too late to invest?\"</i></p>\n<p>It shows that a lot of investors are quick to be blinded by the prospects of large and rapid gains.</p>\n<p>But before you fall for the hype, I'm here to warn you that past results are not an indication of future returns, and surely, these gains won't last forever.</p>\n<p>Buying meme stocks like AMC after they have already returned 1,000%-plus in a year is the equivalent of going to the casino and putting your money on red.</p>\n<p>It may earn you a quick buck, but if you keep playing for long enough, you will likely lose it all. Instead of treating the stock market as a casino, I would strongly advise you to exercise more caution when investing your hard-earned money.</p>\n<p>There's nothing wrong with investing in safe and growing companies with the potential for ~10% annual total returns in the long run.</p>\n<p>That's what will ultimately get you ahead.</p>\n<p>You will likely outperform 99% of meme stock investors, and you will do so while earning steady income, and with lower risk.</p>\n<p>In what follows, we will present two high-yielding stocks that we bought recently at High Yield Landlord. They're the opposite of meme stocks in the sense that they are unlikely to earn you rapid gains (or losses), but they have great chances of generating double-digit annual total returns in the long run.</p>\n<p>Forget stonks, buy these two high-yielding stocks instead:</p>\n<p><b>BSR REIT (OTCPK:BSRTF)</b></p>\n<p>BSR REIT is a bit of an odd case when it comes to a stock exchange listing. It is listed primarily on the Canadian exchange (Ticker: HOM.U) while also trading over the counter in the U.S. (Ticker:OTCPK:BSRTF), but the company is headquartered in Little Rock, Arkansas, and owns apartment complexes only in the Southern sunbelt of the United States - primarily Texas.</p>\n<p>Today, &gt;80% of its revenue comes from three cities: Dallas, Houston, and Austin, which are among the fastest growing cities in the US.</p>\n<p>As we explain in a previousarticle, businesses are today relocating from expensive tax-heavy states like California and New York to Texas in order to improve their competitiveness and profitability.</p>\n<p>We already know about Tesla's (TSLA) Elon Musk and Spotify's (SPOT) Joe Rogan from the headlines, but a recentNational Real Estate Investorarticle added a few corporate names to the list:</p>\n<blockquote>\n <ul>\n  <li>Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE), moving its HQ from California to Houston, Texas.</li>\n  <li>Oracle (ORCL), moving its HQ from California to Austin, Texas.</li>\n  <li>Co-founder of Palantir Technologies (PLTR) Joe Lonsdale and his venture capital firm 8VC, moving from California to Austin, Texas.</li>\n  <li>Charles Schwab (SCHW), relocating its HQ from California to the Dallas/Fort Worth area.</li>\n  <li>McKesson (MCK), moving from California to the Dallas/Fort Worth area.</li>\n </ul>\n</blockquote>\n<p>Why have so many businesses and entrepreneurs left the Golden State to domicile in Texas? The short answer is that business goes to where it's treated best.</p>\n<p>We think that this trend will only accelerate going forward because people have learned to work remotely via Zoom (ZM) and the need to be stuck in a specific location (Think: Manhattan or Silicon Valley) has gone down.</p>\n<p>There's also the fact that it's today easier to move than ever before. You can access all the information you need on YouTube (GOOG)(NASDAQ:GOOGL)and there are plenty of service providers to facilitate the transition.</p>\n<p>BSR REIT is set to profit as its Texas-centered communities increase in demand, allowing for rent hikes and occupancy growth.</p>\n<p>You would expect such a REIT to be priced at a large premium to net asset value, but because it's primarily traded in Canada, BSR has missed out on some of the recent appreciation, and remains attractively priced:</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fe0ce7154d4f25042da0b42976ed1402\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"436\">As of right now, BSR is valued at a ~5% discount to NAV even as its peers trade at a 10-20% premium to NAV. While you wait for the upside, you also earn a 4.2% dividend yield.</p>\n<p><b>Realty Income (O)</b></p>\n<p>Realty Income is one of the bluest blue chips in the entire REIT space. It has managed to deliver 15.2% average annual total returns since its inception in 1994 - by following a low risk approach targeting high quality net lease properties:</p>\n<p><b>What are net lease properties?</b></p>\n<p>They're mainly freestanding single-tenant properties such as Walgreens (WBA) pharmacies, Walmart(NYSE:WMT)grocery stores, Dollar Tree (DLTR) convenience stores, or even McDonald's (MCD) restaurants.</p>\n<p>What's uniquely attractive about these net lease properties is that:</p>\n<ul>\n <li>The leases are very long at 10-15 years.</li>\n <li>The rent is pre-determined for the entire lease period.</li>\n <li>The rent typically goes up by 1-2% each year.</li>\n <li>The tenant pays all property expenses, including even maintenance.</li>\n <li>The properties are recession-proof and Amazon-proof (AMZN).</li>\n</ul>\n<p>Investing in net lease properties is risky if you own only one or a few assets because the impact of a vacancy would be significant. But if you own. Thousands of properties like Realty Income, you are well diversified and the risk-to-reward improves significantly.</p>\n<p>That's how Realty Income has managed to hike its dividend every year since going public. Note even the great financial crisis could stop it:</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b911e49614a87560edc11b059d7189d7\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"358\">Again, you would expect such a business to be richly valued in today's market. Yet, because of unusual circumstances, the stock has become steeply undervalued.</p>\n<p>Firstly, it dropped due to COVID fears, and even as it kept posting record results, it failed to recover.</p>\n<p>Then, it announced the buyout of Vereit (VER), which is expected to increase the company's FFO per share by 10% immediately, and another 5%-10% over time.</p>\n<p>We estimate that the company is worth roughly $100 per share, and it currently trades at $70 per share. That's a 30% discount, which is very significant for a blue-chip REIT in today's market.</p>\n<p>By now, most blue-chip REITs have fully recovered and have little upside left. In comparison, Realty Income stands out with its 4%+ monthly dividend yield, ~5% annual growth, and 40% upside to fair value.</p>\n<p><b>Bottom Line</b></p>\n<p>You don't need to take insane risks trading meme stocks to earn attractive returns over time.</p>\n<p>I know it's easy to fall for the hype when you hear your colleague make a killing with AMC call options. But what you don't hear about are all the people who blew their entire life savings attempting to do the same thing.</p>\n<p>Slow and steady wins the race in the long run.</p>","source":"seekingalpha","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Forget 'Stonks' - These 2 High-Yielding Stocks Win No Matter What</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nForget 'Stonks' - These 2 High-Yielding Stocks Win No Matter What\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-06-08 19:49 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4433143-forget-stonks-these-2-high-yielding-stocks-win-no-matter-what><strong>seekingalpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Summary\n\nIncreasingly many investors are chasing quick gains by investing in meme stocks like AMC and GameStop.\nInstead of treating the stock market as a casino, we would strongly advise you to ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4433143-forget-stonks-these-2-high-yielding-stocks-win-no-matter-what\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"O":"Realty Income Corp","BSRTF":"Bsr Real Estate Invt Tr"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4433143-forget-stonks-these-2-high-yielding-stocks-win-no-matter-what","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5a36db9d73b4222bc376d24ccc48c8a4","article_id":"1114060161","content_text":"Summary\n\nIncreasingly many investors are chasing quick gains by investing in meme stocks like AMC and GameStop.\nInstead of treating the stock market as a casino, we would strongly advise you to exercise more caution when investing your hard-earned money.\nSlow and steady wins the race in the long run. We present two high-yielding stocks that we expect to do far better over time.\n\nAs I write this article, there's a monster rally that's happening in some of the most popular Reddit \"meme stocks\" or \"stonks\" as many like to call them.\nOver the past 10 days:\n\nAMC (AMC) is up 354%\nGameStop (GME) is up 57%\nBlackBerry (BB) is up 77%\nBed Bath & Beyond (BBBY) is up 86%\nKoss (KOSS) is up 140%\n\n\nWhat do all these companies have in common?\n\nThey're heavily shorted.\nTheir businesses have been on a decline for a while.\nBut suddenly, they started surging after gaining the interest from retail investors on the subreddit group wallstreetbets.\nBy now, the group has more than 10 million users, posting memes, but also occasionally research, on these companies, promoting them as \"short-squeeze\" opportunities.\nWe all saw what happened with GameStop earlier this year, and they're now attempting to recreate similar short-squeezes with these other stocks:\nTheir memes are quite funny, but remember that memes are not meant to be financial advice.\nWith AMC surging by 100% in a single day, I have had surprisingly many people here on Seeking Alpha ask me:\"Is it too late to invest?\"\nIt shows that a lot of investors are quick to be blinded by the prospects of large and rapid gains.\nBut before you fall for the hype, I'm here to warn you that past results are not an indication of future returns, and surely, these gains won't last forever.\nBuying meme stocks like AMC after they have already returned 1,000%-plus in a year is the equivalent of going to the casino and putting your money on red.\nIt may earn you a quick buck, but if you keep playing for long enough, you will likely lose it all. Instead of treating the stock market as a casino, I would strongly advise you to exercise more caution when investing your hard-earned money.\nThere's nothing wrong with investing in safe and growing companies with the potential for ~10% annual total returns in the long run.\nThat's what will ultimately get you ahead.\nYou will likely outperform 99% of meme stock investors, and you will do so while earning steady income, and with lower risk.\nIn what follows, we will present two high-yielding stocks that we bought recently at High Yield Landlord. They're the opposite of meme stocks in the sense that they are unlikely to earn you rapid gains (or losses), but they have great chances of generating double-digit annual total returns in the long run.\nForget stonks, buy these two high-yielding stocks instead:\nBSR REIT (OTCPK:BSRTF)\nBSR REIT is a bit of an odd case when it comes to a stock exchange listing. It is listed primarily on the Canadian exchange (Ticker: HOM.U) while also trading over the counter in the U.S. (Ticker:OTCPK:BSRTF), but the company is headquartered in Little Rock, Arkansas, and owns apartment complexes only in the Southern sunbelt of the United States - primarily Texas.\nToday, >80% of its revenue comes from three cities: Dallas, Houston, and Austin, which are among the fastest growing cities in the US.\nAs we explain in a previousarticle, businesses are today relocating from expensive tax-heavy states like California and New York to Texas in order to improve their competitiveness and profitability.\nWe already know about Tesla's (TSLA) Elon Musk and Spotify's (SPOT) Joe Rogan from the headlines, but a recentNational Real Estate Investorarticle added a few corporate names to the list:\n\n\nHewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE), moving its HQ from California to Houston, Texas.\nOracle (ORCL), moving its HQ from California to Austin, Texas.\nCo-founder of Palantir Technologies (PLTR) Joe Lonsdale and his venture capital firm 8VC, moving from California to Austin, Texas.\nCharles Schwab (SCHW), relocating its HQ from California to the Dallas/Fort Worth area.\nMcKesson (MCK), moving from California to the Dallas/Fort Worth area.\n\n\nWhy have so many businesses and entrepreneurs left the Golden State to domicile in Texas? The short answer is that business goes to where it's treated best.\nWe think that this trend will only accelerate going forward because people have learned to work remotely via Zoom (ZM) and the need to be stuck in a specific location (Think: Manhattan or Silicon Valley) has gone down.\nThere's also the fact that it's today easier to move than ever before. You can access all the information you need on YouTube (GOOG)(NASDAQ:GOOGL)and there are plenty of service providers to facilitate the transition.\nBSR REIT is set to profit as its Texas-centered communities increase in demand, allowing for rent hikes and occupancy growth.\nYou would expect such a REIT to be priced at a large premium to net asset value, but because it's primarily traded in Canada, BSR has missed out on some of the recent appreciation, and remains attractively priced:\nAs of right now, BSR is valued at a ~5% discount to NAV even as its peers trade at a 10-20% premium to NAV. While you wait for the upside, you also earn a 4.2% dividend yield.\nRealty Income (O)\nRealty Income is one of the bluest blue chips in the entire REIT space. It has managed to deliver 15.2% average annual total returns since its inception in 1994 - by following a low risk approach targeting high quality net lease properties:\nWhat are net lease properties?\nThey're mainly freestanding single-tenant properties such as Walgreens (WBA) pharmacies, Walmart(NYSE:WMT)grocery stores, Dollar Tree (DLTR) convenience stores, or even McDonald's (MCD) restaurants.\nWhat's uniquely attractive about these net lease properties is that:\n\nThe leases are very long at 10-15 years.\nThe rent is pre-determined for the entire lease period.\nThe rent typically goes up by 1-2% each year.\nThe tenant pays all property expenses, including even maintenance.\nThe properties are recession-proof and Amazon-proof (AMZN).\n\nInvesting in net lease properties is risky if you own only one or a few assets because the impact of a vacancy would be significant. But if you own. Thousands of properties like Realty Income, you are well diversified and the risk-to-reward improves significantly.\nThat's how Realty Income has managed to hike its dividend every year since going public. Note even the great financial crisis could stop it:\nAgain, you would expect such a business to be richly valued in today's market. Yet, because of unusual circumstances, the stock has become steeply undervalued.\nFirstly, it dropped due to COVID fears, and even as it kept posting record results, it failed to recover.\nThen, it announced the buyout of Vereit (VER), which is expected to increase the company's FFO per share by 10% immediately, and another 5%-10% over time.\nWe estimate that the company is worth roughly $100 per share, and it currently trades at $70 per share. That's a 30% discount, which is very significant for a blue-chip REIT in today's market.\nBy now, most blue-chip REITs have fully recovered and have little upside left. In comparison, Realty Income stands out with its 4%+ monthly dividend yield, ~5% annual growth, and 40% upside to fair value.\nBottom Line\nYou don't need to take insane risks trading meme stocks to earn attractive returns over time.\nI know it's easy to fall for the hype when you hear your colleague make a killing with AMC call options. But what you don't hear about are all the people who blew their entire life savings attempting to do the same thing.\nSlow and steady wins the race in the long run.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":419,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":115363572,"gmtCreate":1622952126996,"gmtModify":1704193698654,"author":{"id":"3549802203532457","authorId":"3549802203532457","name":"KasonT","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/00ff9ff5035d964b869c0d61a8e87f94","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3549802203532457","idStr":"3549802203532457"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Microsoft maybe","listText":"Microsoft maybe","text":"Microsoft maybe","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/115363572","repostId":"2140540596","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2140540596","pubTimestamp":1622820692,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2140540596?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-04 23:31","market":"us","language":"en","title":"3 Technology Stocks You Can Buy and Hold for the Next Decade","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2140540596","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"It can be tough to get married to stocks -- especially tech -- but here are three to leave alone for the long haul.","content":"<p>Let's be honest. A lot of people say their positions in flashy technology companies are meant to be long-term holdings, but they're really just an effort to make a quick buck. And that's OK. Any profitable trade is technically a good trade. If you can get in and out at the right time, so be it.</p>\n<p>Thing is, there are plenty of tech names that are more than just flash-in-the-pan prospects, and are better suited for holding periods measured in years rather than weeks.</p>\n<p>Here's a closer look at three such technology companies. Not only will they be just as impressive 10 years from now as they are today, but their stocks should be trading at much higher prices.</p>\n<h2>Microsoft</h2>\n<p>It's tough to imagine a world without <b>Microsoft</b> (NASDAQ:MSFT). Its Windows operating system is installed on three-fourths of the world's desktops and laptops, according to GlobalStats, and its Office productivity software remains the gold standard for the category. <b>Sony</b>'s PlayStation gaming console enjoys more worldwide market share than Microsoft's Xbox, but the Xbox is closing the gap, and is still the most popular game console in the U.S.</p>\n<p>And these are things consumers can readily see. There's a whole different unseen array of Microsoft-made products that are doing similarly well. For instance, Canalys reports Microsoft's cloud computing business accounted for a second-best 19% of the world's first-quarter cloud infrastructure spending, and the company continues to close the gap with market-leader <b>Amazon</b>.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/362a8a5cb8d412d4e3895fa185d236b7\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"484\"><span>Image source: Getty Images.</span></p>\n<p>Now take a step back and ask a thoughtful, critical question: Is there any chance the world will have less need for computers, cloud computing, productivity software, or game consoles 10 years from now?</p>\n<p>Any reasonable and realistic answer has to be \"no.\" Indeed, it would be surprising if demand for these products and services wasn't considerably greater a decade from now. Being a market leader in multiple categories, Microsoft can steer the market's ongoing growth in a way that serves itself best. For example, the Windows operating system comes with trial versions of Office software pre-installed.</p>\n<p>Bolstering the bullish argument for long-term ownership of Microsoft is the company's evolving business model. Access to Azure, Office, and even video games can now be utilized on a monthly subscription basis, accessible via the cloud. This shift not only makes the company's products more affordable to begin using but also gives Microsoft a better chance of keeping those customers by making it easy to update and upgrade software.</p>\n<p>Last year, the last time Microsoft disclosed such data, it had already lined up more than $100 billion worth of subscription cloud revenue that had yet to be booked -- a figure that continues to edge upward.</p>\n<h2><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PANW\">Palo Alto Networks</a></h2>\n<p>Even after several high-profile cybersecurity gaffes embarrassed organizations ranging from <b>Target </b>to <b>Equifax</b> to Yahoo!, some of the world's most important companies are still being hacked. Most recently, Colonial Pipeline agreed to fork over $4.4 million to a computer hacking group known as Darkside to regain control of its 5,500 miles worth of refined oil pipelines.</p>\n<p>These things are preventable. They're just not being prevented, as too many organizations don't utilize all the digital defenses available to them. Perhaps the Colonial Pipeline debacle will encourage procurement of this protection.</p>\n<p>Enter <b>Palo Alto Networks</b> (NYSE:PANW). Simply put, Palo Alto offers software preventing unauthorized access to a company's network, internal apps, and data. It's even got a ransomware protection solution in its lineup that might have been able to save Colonial Pipeline a few million bucks.</p>\n<p>The opportunity is incredible, and should remain so for a while. P&amp;S Intelligence believes the cybersecurity market will grow at an average annual pace of 12.6%, from 2019's $120 billion to $434 billion by 2030. That's a lot, but it's only a fraction of the $10.5 trillion that Cybersecurity Ventures believes cybercrime will cost the world in 2025 alone if enterprises don't step up their digital defense games.</p>\n<p>Palo Alto is doing fine, logging more than seven consecutive years of rising revenue as more and more outfits build their digital moats. Given the outlook, more of the same kind of growth is in the cards for a while.</p>\n<h2>International Business Machines</h2>\n<p>Finally, add <b>International Business Machines</b> (NYSE:IBM) to your list of technology stocks to buy and hold for the next decade.</p>\n<p>Yes, this is the same IBM that failed to respond to the advent of things like cloud computing, mobile devices, and all that goes with both. The company's \"strategic imperatives\" plan unveiled in 2015 was meant to steer the company away from a legacy mainframe business that was already dying and toward more contemporary opportunities like the aforementioned cloud and mobile security. By and large, though, it was too little too late.</p>\n<p>The IBM of today, however, isn't the IBM from even as recently as two years ago. It's ready to compete where it counts.</p>\n<p>Take last month's revelation of new technologies capable of fabricating a 2-nanometer microchip as an example. The microscopic measure is in reference to how small a chip's transistors can be made and still function properly. The smaller, the better, as smaller transistors consume less power, operate faster, and require less space when room is a factor. For perspective, 7-nanometer chips are the best the market has to offer right now.</p>\n<p>It's not just more functional chips IBM is starting to develop, either. Just within the past few weeks, the company has unveiled a way for data centers to more efficiently store and retrieve data, and launched AutoSQL, which is capable of retrieving data eight times faster than previous approaches are. Both technologies have a myriad of potential uses, including in the artificial intelligence arena.</p>\n<p>Read between the lines. This isn't yesteryear's IBM.</p>\n<p>It could still take years for the company to fully monetize these and other breakthroughs, but they're worth the wait.</p>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>3 Technology Stocks You Can Buy and Hold for the Next Decade</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n3 Technology Stocks You Can Buy and Hold for the Next Decade\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-06-04 23:31 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/06/04/3-technology-stocks-you-can-buy-and-hold-for-the-n/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Let's be honest. A lot of people say their positions in flashy technology companies are meant to be long-term holdings, but they're really just an effort to make a quick buck. And that's OK. Any ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/06/04/3-technology-stocks-you-can-buy-and-hold-for-the-n/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"IBM":"IBM","MSFT":"微软","PANW":"Palo Alto Networks"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/06/04/3-technology-stocks-you-can-buy-and-hold-for-the-n/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2140540596","content_text":"Let's be honest. A lot of people say their positions in flashy technology companies are meant to be long-term holdings, but they're really just an effort to make a quick buck. And that's OK. Any profitable trade is technically a good trade. If you can get in and out at the right time, so be it.\nThing is, there are plenty of tech names that are more than just flash-in-the-pan prospects, and are better suited for holding periods measured in years rather than weeks.\nHere's a closer look at three such technology companies. Not only will they be just as impressive 10 years from now as they are today, but their stocks should be trading at much higher prices.\nMicrosoft\nIt's tough to imagine a world without Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT). Its Windows operating system is installed on three-fourths of the world's desktops and laptops, according to GlobalStats, and its Office productivity software remains the gold standard for the category. Sony's PlayStation gaming console enjoys more worldwide market share than Microsoft's Xbox, but the Xbox is closing the gap, and is still the most popular game console in the U.S.\nAnd these are things consumers can readily see. There's a whole different unseen array of Microsoft-made products that are doing similarly well. For instance, Canalys reports Microsoft's cloud computing business accounted for a second-best 19% of the world's first-quarter cloud infrastructure spending, and the company continues to close the gap with market-leader Amazon.\nImage source: Getty Images.\nNow take a step back and ask a thoughtful, critical question: Is there any chance the world will have less need for computers, cloud computing, productivity software, or game consoles 10 years from now?\nAny reasonable and realistic answer has to be \"no.\" Indeed, it would be surprising if demand for these products and services wasn't considerably greater a decade from now. Being a market leader in multiple categories, Microsoft can steer the market's ongoing growth in a way that serves itself best. For example, the Windows operating system comes with trial versions of Office software pre-installed.\nBolstering the bullish argument for long-term ownership of Microsoft is the company's evolving business model. Access to Azure, Office, and even video games can now be utilized on a monthly subscription basis, accessible via the cloud. This shift not only makes the company's products more affordable to begin using but also gives Microsoft a better chance of keeping those customers by making it easy to update and upgrade software.\nLast year, the last time Microsoft disclosed such data, it had already lined up more than $100 billion worth of subscription cloud revenue that had yet to be booked -- a figure that continues to edge upward.\nPalo Alto Networks\nEven after several high-profile cybersecurity gaffes embarrassed organizations ranging from Target to Equifax to Yahoo!, some of the world's most important companies are still being hacked. Most recently, Colonial Pipeline agreed to fork over $4.4 million to a computer hacking group known as Darkside to regain control of its 5,500 miles worth of refined oil pipelines.\nThese things are preventable. They're just not being prevented, as too many organizations don't utilize all the digital defenses available to them. Perhaps the Colonial Pipeline debacle will encourage procurement of this protection.\nEnter Palo Alto Networks (NYSE:PANW). Simply put, Palo Alto offers software preventing unauthorized access to a company's network, internal apps, and data. It's even got a ransomware protection solution in its lineup that might have been able to save Colonial Pipeline a few million bucks.\nThe opportunity is incredible, and should remain so for a while. P&S Intelligence believes the cybersecurity market will grow at an average annual pace of 12.6%, from 2019's $120 billion to $434 billion by 2030. That's a lot, but it's only a fraction of the $10.5 trillion that Cybersecurity Ventures believes cybercrime will cost the world in 2025 alone if enterprises don't step up their digital defense games.\nPalo Alto is doing fine, logging more than seven consecutive years of rising revenue as more and more outfits build their digital moats. Given the outlook, more of the same kind of growth is in the cards for a while.\nInternational Business Machines\nFinally, add International Business Machines (NYSE:IBM) to your list of technology stocks to buy and hold for the next decade.\nYes, this is the same IBM that failed to respond to the advent of things like cloud computing, mobile devices, and all that goes with both. The company's \"strategic imperatives\" plan unveiled in 2015 was meant to steer the company away from a legacy mainframe business that was already dying and toward more contemporary opportunities like the aforementioned cloud and mobile security. By and large, though, it was too little too late.\nThe IBM of today, however, isn't the IBM from even as recently as two years ago. It's ready to compete where it counts.\nTake last month's revelation of new technologies capable of fabricating a 2-nanometer microchip as an example. The microscopic measure is in reference to how small a chip's transistors can be made and still function properly. The smaller, the better, as smaller transistors consume less power, operate faster, and require less space when room is a factor. For perspective, 7-nanometer chips are the best the market has to offer right now.\nIt's not just more functional chips IBM is starting to develop, either. Just within the past few weeks, the company has unveiled a way for data centers to more efficiently store and retrieve data, and launched AutoSQL, which is capable of retrieving data eight times faster than previous approaches are. Both technologies have a myriad of potential uses, including in the artificial intelligence arena.\nRead between the lines. This isn't yesteryear's IBM.\nIt could still take years for the company to fully monetize these and other breakthroughs, but they're worth the wait.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":520,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":116554554,"gmtCreate":1622813553278,"gmtModify":1704191681709,"author":{"id":"3549802203532457","authorId":"3549802203532457","name":"KasonT","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/00ff9ff5035d964b869c0d61a8e87f94","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3549802203532457","idStr":"3549802203532457"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Awesome&nbsp;","listText":"Awesome&nbsp;","text":"Awesome","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/116554554","repostId":"1122373606","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1122373606","pubTimestamp":1622793373,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1122373606?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-04 15:56","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Where Will Apple Stock Be In 10 Years? What To Consider","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1122373606","media":"seekingalpha","summary":"Summary\n\nApple has been a great investment over the last decade, but the next decade may look quite ","content":"<p><b>Summary</b></p>\n<ul>\n <li>Apple has been a great investment over the last decade, but the next decade may look quite different.</li>\n <li>Apple has seen its growth slow down over the last decade, and it will likely not be a growth monster in the coming years, either.</li>\n <li>Shares have ample long-term upside, but investors should consider the current valuation before jumping to decisions.</li>\n</ul>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9f2ea192ed76d9772c2c6a820098faf5\" tg-width=\"1536\" tg-height=\"1024\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>Photo by Paopano/iStock Editorial via Getty Images</span></p>\n<p><b>Article Thesis</b></p>\n<p>Apple (AAPL) has been one of the best investments one could have made over the last decade. Over the next decade, its growth may not be the same, however. Yet, thanks to massive shareholder return programs and a move towards services, Apple's stock will likely still be significantly higher a decade from now - even though the current valuation is rather high.</p>\n<p><b>Apple Stock Price</b></p>\n<p>Over the last decade, Apple Inc. has been a great investment:</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5d29aa34bdbc5bab7d0730a4095954e6\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"419\"><span>Data by YCharts</span></p>\n<p>Shares have returned 900% in those ten years, before dividends, for a compounded annual return of approximately 26%, easily trouncing the returns of the broad market during that time frame. Importantly, shares have risen a lot more than the company's market capitalization, which grew by only 550% over the last decade. The difference can be explained by the company's large share repurchase programs, which have lowered the share count drastically over the last decade. The last decade, of course, was a highly successful period for Apple on a business basis, as the company benefited from the rise of smartphones while also having success with new products such as its Watch and tablets, which Apple more or less introduced as a new product category. Right now, shares trade for $125, up 57% over the last twelve months, but down 6% in 2021 to date. Following strong gains during 2020, shares seem to be in a consolidation pattern for now, which is not too much of a surprise, as Apple's valuation had expanded a lot in the recent past, and it seems that the company's business growth has to catch up to the recent share price increases now. The current consensus price target is $156, which implies an upside potential of 25%. Since there are no signs of shares leaving their current trading range right now, I personally do not think that Apple will breach $150 in the near term.</p>\n<p><b>Where Will Apple Stock Be In 10 Years</b></p>\n<p>Apple's stock price in 2031 is, of course, nothing that can be forecasted with any precision. As history has shown, again and again, it is not even possible to forecast share prices precisely over a much shorter period of time. It is, however, possible to craft scenarios to see where share prices could be in the future under certain conditions, to get a feel for what might be a reasonable expectation for the future.</p>\n<p>To craft one such scenario, we have to consider Apple's business growth, Apple's shareholder return program, and the valuation multiple that shares might trade at in the future.</p>\n<p><b>Apple's business growth</b></p>\n<p>Apple Inc. has seen years of stronger growth and years of weaker growth in the past. This mostly can be explained by factors such as new product introductions, e.g. Watch or iPad, and by the strength of the respective current iPhone models, which see varying demand depending on the year. Other factors, such as economic growth or trade issues, play a role as well.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a5b8bd8ef6cdaa13850c1380e870554c\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"419\"><span>Data by YCharts</span></p>\n<p>Overall, revenues have grown by 154% over the last decade, but as we see in the above chart, revenue growth has been relatively uneven. During the early 2010s, Apple generated massive growth on the back of the iPhones \"road to victory\", whereas revenue growth declined to a much slower pace in the following years. There were even some years during which revenues declined on a year-over-year basis, such as 2016. The average annual revenue growth pace was 10% over the last decade, but when we factor in that this was lifted up by the very strong growth in 2011 and 2012, it may not be too reasonable to assume that Apple will grow by 10% a year in the future, too. Investors should also consider that maintaining a high growth rate becomes ever more difficult the larger a company gets. This does, however, not mean that Apple's revenue growth will slow down to zero.</p>\n<p>On the back of price increases for its products and the potential for market share gains in&nbsp;high-growth countries such as China, where more and more people will be able to buy Apple's higher-priced products, it seems reasonable to assume that Apple will generate at least some growth from its core businesses. Add in growth in the services segment - people use their phones more and more, which should lead to higher app spending - and consider the potential for new product launches (although I assume none will be as massive as the iPhone), and Apple should be able to grow its business at a solid pace. I personally assume that a 5%-7% revenue growth rate could be a realistic estimate for the coming years, although some readers will of course have different opinions.</p>\n<p><b>Apple's shareholder returns</b></p>\n<p>Apple has lowered its share count massively in the past, as shown above, and it is, I believe, reasonable to assume that the same will happen going forward. Over the last decade, Apple bought back 36% of its shares. If the same were to happen over the next decade, each remaining share's portion of the company's value would rise by 56%, or 4.6% annualized. Due to the fact that Apple's current valuation is significantly higher than its historic valuation, buybacks could be less impactful in the future, though. Apple has, for example, only reduced its share count by 2.6% over the last year.</p>\n<p>This is why I believe that the share count will not decline by another 36% over the coming decade. When we adjust that downward to 25%, this would result in a ~3% annual tailwind for Apple's growth when we look at per-share metrics, which are the deciding factor for Apple's share price growth. Combined with my 5%-7% business growth estimate, I thus assume that Apple will grow by 8%-10% on a per-share basis in the long term.</p>\n<p><b>Apple's future valuation</b></p>\n<p>AAPL has been valued in a very wide range in the past, seeing its shares trade for very low multiples at some points, whereas investors were willing to pay significantly more at other times:</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/be5cb8bbc04ff0e0a13ee64f6f2bd90a\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"470\"><span>Data by YCharts</span></p>\n<p>Shares could, five years ago, be bought for a very low 10x net earnings, which naturally was a great time to enter or expand positions. In late 2020, however, shares were trading for as much as 40x the company's net earnings, which seems like a quite high valuation. Right now, AAPL trades at 28x trailing earnings, and at around 24x forward profits. In the above chart, we also see the median earnings multiples over the last 3, 5, 7, and 10 years. It is pretty clear that Apple's valuation has expanded over the years, which is why the median values are higher for the shorter \"lookback\" periods. I do not believe that AAPL will trade at the 15.5x net earnings that it has traded at, on average, over the last decade, as this seems like a rather low valuation for a quality company like Apple with a strong brand, massive scale, great margins, and a fortress balance sheet. On the other hand, I also don't believe that Apple will trade at a 24-28x earnings multiple forever - for a company that generates solid but unspectacular business growth in the mid-single-digits, that seems quite expensive. This is especially true when we consider that interest rates will likely be higher a decade from now, which should pressure valuations for all equities, all else equal. I thus believe that a valuation of around 20x net earnings could be a reasonable estimate for 2031, which would be more or less in line with the 3-year median earnings multiple.</p>\n<p><b>Is AAPL A Buy Or Sell Now</b></p>\n<p>Starting our calculation with an EPS estimate of $5.15 for 2021 and assuming that this will grow by 7%-10% a year through 2031, we reach an EPS range of $10.10 to $13.40. Putting a 20x earnings multiple on that leads to a target price of around $200-$270/share. At the midpoint of around $235, shares would thus see gains of around 90% from the current level, or around 6.5% annualized. That surely is not a bad return, and when we add in the dividend, we would get to an annualized return of roughly 7%. This is, on the other hand, also not an outrageously great return, I believe.</p>\n<p>AAPL has, I believe, significant upside potential over the next decade, but that should not be a large surprise - many companies will see significant growth over a time span this long. I personally am not too excited about a 7% expected long-term return. When we consider that shares do have considerable downside risk in the next 1-3 years if Apple's valuation declines, e.g. due to rising interest rates, it may be a better choice to stay on the sidelines for now. Long-term investors will likely not do badly when they buy shares at current levels, but they will likely also not do great. For now, I'd rate Apple a hold, and a potential buy if its valuation comes closer to the longer-term average. Those that are more optimistic about new product launches may disagree and favor buying here, but it could turn out that waiting for a better opportunity is the best choice here.</p>\n<p>Summing it up, I'd say shares do have significant upside potential over the next decade, but the upside potential is not large enough to make me buy shares at current, elevated, valuations.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Where Will Apple Stock Be In 10 Years? What To Consider</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhere Will Apple Stock Be In 10 Years? What To Consider\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-06-04 15:56 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4432703-apple-stock-in-10-years><strong>seekingalpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Summary\n\nApple has been a great investment over the last decade, but the next decade may look quite different.\nApple has seen its growth slow down over the last decade, and it will likely not be a ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4432703-apple-stock-in-10-years\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4432703-apple-stock-in-10-years","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1122373606","content_text":"Summary\n\nApple has been a great investment over the last decade, but the next decade may look quite different.\nApple has seen its growth slow down over the last decade, and it will likely not be a growth monster in the coming years, either.\nShares have ample long-term upside, but investors should consider the current valuation before jumping to decisions.\n\nPhoto by Paopano/iStock Editorial via Getty Images\nArticle Thesis\nApple (AAPL) has been one of the best investments one could have made over the last decade. Over the next decade, its growth may not be the same, however. Yet, thanks to massive shareholder return programs and a move towards services, Apple's stock will likely still be significantly higher a decade from now - even though the current valuation is rather high.\nApple Stock Price\nOver the last decade, Apple Inc. has been a great investment:\nData by YCharts\nShares have returned 900% in those ten years, before dividends, for a compounded annual return of approximately 26%, easily trouncing the returns of the broad market during that time frame. Importantly, shares have risen a lot more than the company's market capitalization, which grew by only 550% over the last decade. The difference can be explained by the company's large share repurchase programs, which have lowered the share count drastically over the last decade. The last decade, of course, was a highly successful period for Apple on a business basis, as the company benefited from the rise of smartphones while also having success with new products such as its Watch and tablets, which Apple more or less introduced as a new product category. Right now, shares trade for $125, up 57% over the last twelve months, but down 6% in 2021 to date. Following strong gains during 2020, shares seem to be in a consolidation pattern for now, which is not too much of a surprise, as Apple's valuation had expanded a lot in the recent past, and it seems that the company's business growth has to catch up to the recent share price increases now. The current consensus price target is $156, which implies an upside potential of 25%. Since there are no signs of shares leaving their current trading range right now, I personally do not think that Apple will breach $150 in the near term.\nWhere Will Apple Stock Be In 10 Years\nApple's stock price in 2031 is, of course, nothing that can be forecasted with any precision. As history has shown, again and again, it is not even possible to forecast share prices precisely over a much shorter period of time. It is, however, possible to craft scenarios to see where share prices could be in the future under certain conditions, to get a feel for what might be a reasonable expectation for the future.\nTo craft one such scenario, we have to consider Apple's business growth, Apple's shareholder return program, and the valuation multiple that shares might trade at in the future.\nApple's business growth\nApple Inc. has seen years of stronger growth and years of weaker growth in the past. This mostly can be explained by factors such as new product introductions, e.g. Watch or iPad, and by the strength of the respective current iPhone models, which see varying demand depending on the year. Other factors, such as economic growth or trade issues, play a role as well.\nData by YCharts\nOverall, revenues have grown by 154% over the last decade, but as we see in the above chart, revenue growth has been relatively uneven. During the early 2010s, Apple generated massive growth on the back of the iPhones \"road to victory\", whereas revenue growth declined to a much slower pace in the following years. There were even some years during which revenues declined on a year-over-year basis, such as 2016. The average annual revenue growth pace was 10% over the last decade, but when we factor in that this was lifted up by the very strong growth in 2011 and 2012, it may not be too reasonable to assume that Apple will grow by 10% a year in the future, too. Investors should also consider that maintaining a high growth rate becomes ever more difficult the larger a company gets. This does, however, not mean that Apple's revenue growth will slow down to zero.\nOn the back of price increases for its products and the potential for market share gains in high-growth countries such as China, where more and more people will be able to buy Apple's higher-priced products, it seems reasonable to assume that Apple will generate at least some growth from its core businesses. Add in growth in the services segment - people use their phones more and more, which should lead to higher app spending - and consider the potential for new product launches (although I assume none will be as massive as the iPhone), and Apple should be able to grow its business at a solid pace. I personally assume that a 5%-7% revenue growth rate could be a realistic estimate for the coming years, although some readers will of course have different opinions.\nApple's shareholder returns\nApple has lowered its share count massively in the past, as shown above, and it is, I believe, reasonable to assume that the same will happen going forward. Over the last decade, Apple bought back 36% of its shares. If the same were to happen over the next decade, each remaining share's portion of the company's value would rise by 56%, or 4.6% annualized. Due to the fact that Apple's current valuation is significantly higher than its historic valuation, buybacks could be less impactful in the future, though. Apple has, for example, only reduced its share count by 2.6% over the last year.\nThis is why I believe that the share count will not decline by another 36% over the coming decade. When we adjust that downward to 25%, this would result in a ~3% annual tailwind for Apple's growth when we look at per-share metrics, which are the deciding factor for Apple's share price growth. Combined with my 5%-7% business growth estimate, I thus assume that Apple will grow by 8%-10% on a per-share basis in the long term.\nApple's future valuation\nAAPL has been valued in a very wide range in the past, seeing its shares trade for very low multiples at some points, whereas investors were willing to pay significantly more at other times:\nData by YCharts\nShares could, five years ago, be bought for a very low 10x net earnings, which naturally was a great time to enter or expand positions. In late 2020, however, shares were trading for as much as 40x the company's net earnings, which seems like a quite high valuation. Right now, AAPL trades at 28x trailing earnings, and at around 24x forward profits. In the above chart, we also see the median earnings multiples over the last 3, 5, 7, and 10 years. It is pretty clear that Apple's valuation has expanded over the years, which is why the median values are higher for the shorter \"lookback\" periods. I do not believe that AAPL will trade at the 15.5x net earnings that it has traded at, on average, over the last decade, as this seems like a rather low valuation for a quality company like Apple with a strong brand, massive scale, great margins, and a fortress balance sheet. On the other hand, I also don't believe that Apple will trade at a 24-28x earnings multiple forever - for a company that generates solid but unspectacular business growth in the mid-single-digits, that seems quite expensive. This is especially true when we consider that interest rates will likely be higher a decade from now, which should pressure valuations for all equities, all else equal. I thus believe that a valuation of around 20x net earnings could be a reasonable estimate for 2031, which would be more or less in line with the 3-year median earnings multiple.\nIs AAPL A Buy Or Sell Now\nStarting our calculation with an EPS estimate of $5.15 for 2021 and assuming that this will grow by 7%-10% a year through 2031, we reach an EPS range of $10.10 to $13.40. Putting a 20x earnings multiple on that leads to a target price of around $200-$270/share. At the midpoint of around $235, shares would thus see gains of around 90% from the current level, or around 6.5% annualized. That surely is not a bad return, and when we add in the dividend, we would get to an annualized return of roughly 7%. This is, on the other hand, also not an outrageously great return, I believe.\nAAPL has, I believe, significant upside potential over the next decade, but that should not be a large surprise - many companies will see significant growth over a time span this long. I personally am not too excited about a 7% expected long-term return. When we consider that shares do have considerable downside risk in the next 1-3 years if Apple's valuation declines, e.g. due to rising interest rates, it may be a better choice to stay on the sidelines for now. Long-term investors will likely not do badly when they buy shares at current levels, but they will likely also not do great. For now, I'd rate Apple a hold, and a potential buy if its valuation comes closer to the longer-term average. Those that are more optimistic about new product launches may disagree and favor buying here, but it could turn out that waiting for a better opportunity is the best choice here.\nSumming it up, I'd say shares do have significant upside potential over the next decade, but the upside potential is not large enough to make me buy shares at current, elevated, valuations.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":433,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":118515890,"gmtCreate":1622738273710,"gmtModify":1704190265103,"author":{"id":"3549802203532457","authorId":"3549802203532457","name":"KasonT","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/00ff9ff5035d964b869c0d61a8e87f94","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3549802203532457","idStr":"3549802203532457"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Because they lose too much","listText":"Because they lose too much","text":"Because they lose too much","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/118515890","repostId":"1160289276","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1160289276","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1622733272,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1160289276?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-03 23:14","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Short sellers mostly held their ground as AMC shares soared","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1160289276","media":"Reuters","summary":"Bearish investors betting that AMC Entertainment Holdings would decline held on to their bets for th","content":"<p>Bearish investors betting that AMC Entertainment Holdings&nbsp;would decline held on to their bets for the most part on Wednesday even as the stock rose as much as 127% to $72.62 during the trading session, according to the latest data from S3 Partners.</p>\n<p>About 89.98 million shares in AMC were sold short by the end of Wednesday's trading session compared with 90.87 million short interest at Tuesday's close, according to Ihor Dusaniwsky, managing director of predictive analytics at S3.</p>\n<p>AMC shares, which closed Wednesday's session up 95% at $62.55, were last down 24% at $47.33 on Thursday.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Short sellers mostly held their ground as AMC shares soared</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nShort sellers mostly held their ground as AMC shares soared\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-06-03 23:14</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Bearish investors betting that AMC Entertainment Holdings&nbsp;would decline held on to their bets for the most part on Wednesday even as the stock rose as much as 127% to $72.62 during the trading session, according to the latest data from S3 Partners.</p>\n<p>About 89.98 million shares in AMC were sold short by the end of Wednesday's trading session compared with 90.87 million short interest at Tuesday's close, according to Ihor Dusaniwsky, managing director of predictive analytics at S3.</p>\n<p>AMC shares, which closed Wednesday's session up 95% at $62.55, were last down 24% at $47.33 on Thursday.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AMC":"AMC院线"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1160289276","content_text":"Bearish investors betting that AMC Entertainment Holdings would decline held on to their bets for the most part on Wednesday even as the stock rose as much as 127% to $72.62 during the trading session, according to the latest data from S3 Partners.\nAbout 89.98 million shares in AMC were sold short by the end of Wednesday's trading session compared with 90.87 million short interest at Tuesday's close, according to Ihor Dusaniwsky, managing director of predictive analytics at S3.\nAMC shares, which closed Wednesday's session up 95% at $62.55, were last down 24% at $47.33 on Thursday.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":209,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":118511865,"gmtCreate":1622737977157,"gmtModify":1704190259755,"author":{"id":"3549802203532457","authorId":"3549802203532457","name":"KasonT","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/00ff9ff5035d964b869c0d61a8e87f94","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3549802203532457","idStr":"3549802203532457"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hopefully go up again","listText":"Hopefully go up again","text":"Hopefully go up again","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/118511865","repostId":"1150431596","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":156,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":118220971,"gmtCreate":1622734229393,"gmtModify":1704190163006,"author":{"id":"3549802203532457","authorId":"3549802203532457","name":"KasonT","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/00ff9ff5035d964b869c0d61a8e87f94","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3549802203532457","idStr":"3549802203532457"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Wow","listText":"Wow","text":"Wow","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/118220971","repostId":"1150431596","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":205,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":111131824,"gmtCreate":1622658918368,"gmtModify":1704188358604,"author":{"id":"3549802203532457","authorId":"3549802203532457","name":"KasonT","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/00ff9ff5035d964b869c0d61a8e87f94","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3549802203532457","idStr":"3549802203532457"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hmm","listText":"Hmm","text":"Hmm","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/111131824","repostId":"2140448417","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2140448417","pubTimestamp":1622648316,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2140448417?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-02 23:38","market":"us","language":"en","title":"What You Should Know About Upstart Holdings' Valuation","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2140448417","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Investors are paying a big premium for this artificial intelligence-driven lending disruptor.","content":"<p>When it comes to lending money, the fundamentals haven't changed much over the years. Banks typically want to see a steady income, responsible spending habits, and an item of security -- like a house or a car -- before writing loans. Technology has improved the process significantly, and it continues to evolve to provide more information to lenders and more options for consumers.</p>\n<p><b>Upstart Holdings </b>(NASDAQ:UPST) is all-digital lending platform with an artificial intelligence model that measures alternative metrics when assessing a potential borrower. The company uses the technology to help originate loans for lenders, and its business model is already delivering profits. Its valuation, though, has ballooned as enthusiastic investors bet heavily on the stock -- and it could take <i>years </i>for profits to catch up. Is it still worth an investment today?</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/47a7615523095573d390a24d22976d99\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\"><span>Image Source: Getty Images.</span></p>\n<h2>How it works</h2>\n<p>Upstart partners with banks that write unsecured loans, to borrowers who might have a moderate to low income and might be used to paying higher interest rates. Some of its offerings include personal loans, wedding loans, credit card consolidation, and car loans. The annual percentage rate (interest) for an Upstart loan is in the 8.27% to 35.99% range, depending on the product.</p>\n<p>Total non-housing consumer debt in the U.S. stood at more than $4.1 trillion in Q1, including about $745 billion in ''revolving credit'' (credit cards and other loans consumers can pay down, reuse, and carry balances on). Upstart has a substantial market opportunity that it has only just begun to tap.</p>\n<p>Potential borrowers can submit a loan application through a bank that uses Upstart's application programming interface (API). Behind the scenes, the company's artificial intelligence is assessing the proposed loan, looking at more than 1,000 data points to provide a decision instantly (in most cases).</p>\n<p>Upstart's algorithm has the ability to assess a borrower based on nontraditional metrics. For example, it accounts for a borrower's education and where they went to school, in addition to their job history, rather than just on income and assets. The company claims its decision process can reduce default rates by 75%. In fact, it boasts 173% <i>more</i> approvals for the same overall loan loss rate.</p>\n<h2>Priced for perfection</h2>\n<p>Banks are usually valued methodically, using metrics like tangible book value and earnings per share. Investors have decades' worth of historical earnings and valuations to work with when assessing financial institutions. New technology makes the process a bit different -- investors don't have the same history to study, and disruptive companies can therefore be difficult to value.</p>\n<p>At the moment, Upstart is trading like a growth-oriented tech company, and this <i>could </i>be warranted since it's effectively a software business.</p>\n<table>\n <thead>\n  <tr>\n   <th><p>Year</p></th>\n   <th><p>Revenue</p></th>\n  </tr>\n </thead>\n <tbody>\n  <tr>\n   <td><p>2018</p></td>\n   <td><p>$99 million</p></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><p>2019</p></td>\n   <td><p>$164 million</p></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><p>2020</p></td>\n   <td><p>$233 million</p></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><p>Q1 2021</p></td>\n   <td><p>$121 million</p></td>\n  </tr>\n </tbody>\n</table>\n<p>Data source: Company filings.</p>\n<p>At Wednesday's prices, Upstart has a market cap over $11 billion, with full-year 2020 net income of $6 million. The company beat that total in this year's first quarter, with a net income of $10.1 million, so you can see how fast it's growing. However, it will likely need to earn significantly more for its current valuation to remain at these lofty levels.</p>\n<p>The company expects to earn $500 million in revenue in 2021 -- which would represent 114% in yearly revenue growth -- and based on the Q1 result, this could translate to over $40 million in net income.</p>\n<p>For the company to keep up this pace, it will most likely need new catalysts, and it likely has them.&nbsp;Upstart is now offering its platform technology to auto financiers, to capture a piece of the single largest lending segment after housing. Total auto loans in the U.S. grew to $1.37 trillion in 2020, and car shortages have led to higher prices and pent up demand across the board.</p>\n<p>The company has trailing 12-month revenue of $290 million, so the stock currently trades at a revenue multiple of roughly 38 times. That's higher than <b>Tesla</b>'s! With the growth opportunities Upstart is expecting, the company has the opportunity to grow its way into a less intimidating multiple over the next few years.&nbsp;But if you're buying it today, Upstart <i>must</i> deliver.</p>\n<h2>Looking forward</h2>\n<p>Upstart is showing promising growth in originations, with $1.73 billion in Q1, up 102% year over year on 169,750 total loans. This is <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE\">one</a> of the best metrics to measure the company's performance, as it translates directly to revenue. Since the company's algorithm instantly and automatically approved 71% of those loans, the scalability of this business is potentially enormous.</p>\n<p>If the company continues to deliver growth in net income, its stock will likely remain buoyant -- although the risk to the valuation <i>might </i>be to the downside, depending how fast that growth is. The question for investors is whether there is enough upside potential from here to warrant that risk. Upstart is guiding for a similar amount of net income in the second quarter as it delivered in Q1, putting the company on track to generate less than $50 million this year. That might not be enough to sustain its current market cap.</p>\n<p>However, for investors with a five-year time horizon (or more), Upstart could present a strong growth opportunity.</p>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>What You Should Know About Upstart Holdings' Valuation</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhat You Should Know About Upstart Holdings' Valuation\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-06-02 23:38 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/06/02/what-you-should-know-about-upstart-holdings-valuat/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>When it comes to lending money, the fundamentals haven't changed much over the years. Banks typically want to see a steady income, responsible spending habits, and an item of security -- like a house ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/06/02/what-you-should-know-about-upstart-holdings-valuat/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"UPST":"Upstart Holdings, Inc."},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/06/02/what-you-should-know-about-upstart-holdings-valuat/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2140448417","content_text":"When it comes to lending money, the fundamentals haven't changed much over the years. Banks typically want to see a steady income, responsible spending habits, and an item of security -- like a house or a car -- before writing loans. Technology has improved the process significantly, and it continues to evolve to provide more information to lenders and more options for consumers.\nUpstart Holdings (NASDAQ:UPST) is all-digital lending platform with an artificial intelligence model that measures alternative metrics when assessing a potential borrower. The company uses the technology to help originate loans for lenders, and its business model is already delivering profits. Its valuation, though, has ballooned as enthusiastic investors bet heavily on the stock -- and it could take years for profits to catch up. Is it still worth an investment today?\nImage Source: Getty Images.\nHow it works\nUpstart partners with banks that write unsecured loans, to borrowers who might have a moderate to low income and might be used to paying higher interest rates. Some of its offerings include personal loans, wedding loans, credit card consolidation, and car loans. The annual percentage rate (interest) for an Upstart loan is in the 8.27% to 35.99% range, depending on the product.\nTotal non-housing consumer debt in the U.S. stood at more than $4.1 trillion in Q1, including about $745 billion in ''revolving credit'' (credit cards and other loans consumers can pay down, reuse, and carry balances on). Upstart has a substantial market opportunity that it has only just begun to tap.\nPotential borrowers can submit a loan application through a bank that uses Upstart's application programming interface (API). Behind the scenes, the company's artificial intelligence is assessing the proposed loan, looking at more than 1,000 data points to provide a decision instantly (in most cases).\nUpstart's algorithm has the ability to assess a borrower based on nontraditional metrics. For example, it accounts for a borrower's education and where they went to school, in addition to their job history, rather than just on income and assets. The company claims its decision process can reduce default rates by 75%. In fact, it boasts 173% more approvals for the same overall loan loss rate.\nPriced for perfection\nBanks are usually valued methodically, using metrics like tangible book value and earnings per share. Investors have decades' worth of historical earnings and valuations to work with when assessing financial institutions. New technology makes the process a bit different -- investors don't have the same history to study, and disruptive companies can therefore be difficult to value.\nAt the moment, Upstart is trading like a growth-oriented tech company, and this could be warranted since it's effectively a software business.\n\n\n\nYear\nRevenue\n\n\n\n\n2018\n$99 million\n\n\n2019\n$164 million\n\n\n2020\n$233 million\n\n\nQ1 2021\n$121 million\n\n\n\nData source: Company filings.\nAt Wednesday's prices, Upstart has a market cap over $11 billion, with full-year 2020 net income of $6 million. The company beat that total in this year's first quarter, with a net income of $10.1 million, so you can see how fast it's growing. However, it will likely need to earn significantly more for its current valuation to remain at these lofty levels.\nThe company expects to earn $500 million in revenue in 2021 -- which would represent 114% in yearly revenue growth -- and based on the Q1 result, this could translate to over $40 million in net income.\nFor the company to keep up this pace, it will most likely need new catalysts, and it likely has them. Upstart is now offering its platform technology to auto financiers, to capture a piece of the single largest lending segment after housing. Total auto loans in the U.S. grew to $1.37 trillion in 2020, and car shortages have led to higher prices and pent up demand across the board.\nThe company has trailing 12-month revenue of $290 million, so the stock currently trades at a revenue multiple of roughly 38 times. That's higher than Tesla's! With the growth opportunities Upstart is expecting, the company has the opportunity to grow its way into a less intimidating multiple over the next few years. But if you're buying it today, Upstart must deliver.\nLooking forward\nUpstart is showing promising growth in originations, with $1.73 billion in Q1, up 102% year over year on 169,750 total loans. This is one of the best metrics to measure the company's performance, as it translates directly to revenue. Since the company's algorithm instantly and automatically approved 71% of those loans, the scalability of this business is potentially enormous.\nIf the company continues to deliver growth in net income, its stock will likely remain buoyant -- although the risk to the valuation might be to the downside, depending how fast that growth is. The question for investors is whether there is enough upside potential from here to warrant that risk. Upstart is guiding for a similar amount of net income in the second quarter as it delivered in Q1, putting the company on track to generate less than $50 million this year. That might not be enough to sustain its current market cap.\nHowever, for investors with a five-year time horizon (or more), Upstart could present a strong growth opportunity.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":75,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":133222430,"gmtCreate":1621756681420,"gmtModify":1704362137047,"author":{"id":"3549802203532457","authorId":"3549802203532457","name":"KasonT","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/00ff9ff5035d964b869c0d61a8e87f94","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3549802203532457","idStr":"3549802203532457"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hmmm","listText":"Hmmm","text":"Hmmm","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/133222430","repostId":"2137290933","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2137290933","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1621597060,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2137290933?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-05-21 19:37","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple's Tim Cook to defend App Store at trial with Fortnite maker","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2137290933","media":"Reuters","summary":"May 21 (Reuters) - Apple Inc Chief Executive Tim Cook on Friday will take the witness stand to defen","content":"<p>May 21 (Reuters) - Apple Inc&nbsp;Chief Executive Tim Cook on Friday will take the witness stand to defend the App Store, a booming part of the iPhone maker's business that \"Fortnite\" maker Epic Games says is a monopoly that Apple abuses.</p>\n<p>Cook is expected to spend more than two hours making what are likely to be his most extensive public remarks on the App Store business, which anchors Apple's $53.8 billion services business.</p>\n<p>Epic has waged a public relations and legal campaign, arguing that Apple acts anticompetitively by only allowing apps it approves on the world's 1 billion iPhones and by forcing developers to use Apple's in-app payment system, which charges commissions of up to 30% on sales.</p>\n<p>The antitrust trial at a federal courthouse in Oakland, California comes as Apple faces a chorus of criticism from app makers including music service Spotify Technology(SPOT.N)and U.S. politicians who say the most valuable public company in the United States tries to squash small competition.</p>\n<p>The maker of \"Fortnite,\" which pits players against in each other in an animated \"Battle Royale\" fight to the last survivor, is led by CEO Tim Sweeney, who has reveled in the public opportunity to take on Apple.</p>\n<p>Sweeney kicked off the trial as Epic's first witness, using his time on the stand to argue that \"Fortnite\" has become a place for players to gather in a virtual world he calls the \"metaverse\" and that Apple is unfairly demanding an outsized cut of profits for providing simple payment processing technology.</p>\n<p>Cook fielded a handful of questions about the company's App Store when he testified before U.S. lawmakers last year, but he otherwise stayed mostly silent as lawmakers grilled the chiefs of Alphabet Inc's&nbsp;Google and Facebook Inc.</p>\n<p>Apple attorneys said they plan to ask him to testify about Apple's corporate values, how the App Store came about and Apple's competitive landscape. Throughout the trial, Apple has sought to persuade Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers that whatever rules it imposes on developers are aimed at keeping its customers' information private and safe from malware.</p>\n<p>But Epic's legal team has put other Apple executives under pressure during the three-week trial. During a cross-examination Thursday, Apple's software chief Craig Federighi lashed out at one of Epic's attorneys who did not allow Federighi to explain the technical details of why Apple does not use automated tools to scan for some offensive content. Judge Gonzalez Rogers intervened to tell Federighi he would have to wait to explain himself later, when Apple's lawyers resumed questions.</p>\n<p>Competition authorities in multiple countries have opened probes into the business, including a case in the European Union around Apple's treatment of Spotify.</p>\n<p>In United States, lawmakers such as Senator Amy Klobuchar who are contemplating new antitrust laws are likely to comb through the records generated in the Epic case.</p>\n<p>\"This case has always been part of a bigger narrative rather than something that's going to decide the issue on its own,\" said John Bergmayer, legal director at consumer advocacy group Public Knowledge.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple's Tim Cook to defend App Store at trial with Fortnite maker</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple's Tim Cook to defend App Store at trial with Fortnite maker\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-05-21 19:37</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>May 21 (Reuters) - Apple Inc&nbsp;Chief Executive Tim Cook on Friday will take the witness stand to defend the App Store, a booming part of the iPhone maker's business that \"Fortnite\" maker Epic Games says is a monopoly that Apple abuses.</p>\n<p>Cook is expected to spend more than two hours making what are likely to be his most extensive public remarks on the App Store business, which anchors Apple's $53.8 billion services business.</p>\n<p>Epic has waged a public relations and legal campaign, arguing that Apple acts anticompetitively by only allowing apps it approves on the world's 1 billion iPhones and by forcing developers to use Apple's in-app payment system, which charges commissions of up to 30% on sales.</p>\n<p>The antitrust trial at a federal courthouse in Oakland, California comes as Apple faces a chorus of criticism from app makers including music service Spotify Technology(SPOT.N)and U.S. politicians who say the most valuable public company in the United States tries to squash small competition.</p>\n<p>The maker of \"Fortnite,\" which pits players against in each other in an animated \"Battle Royale\" fight to the last survivor, is led by CEO Tim Sweeney, who has reveled in the public opportunity to take on Apple.</p>\n<p>Sweeney kicked off the trial as Epic's first witness, using his time on the stand to argue that \"Fortnite\" has become a place for players to gather in a virtual world he calls the \"metaverse\" and that Apple is unfairly demanding an outsized cut of profits for providing simple payment processing technology.</p>\n<p>Cook fielded a handful of questions about the company's App Store when he testified before U.S. lawmakers last year, but he otherwise stayed mostly silent as lawmakers grilled the chiefs of Alphabet Inc's&nbsp;Google and Facebook Inc.</p>\n<p>Apple attorneys said they plan to ask him to testify about Apple's corporate values, how the App Store came about and Apple's competitive landscape. Throughout the trial, Apple has sought to persuade Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers that whatever rules it imposes on developers are aimed at keeping its customers' information private and safe from malware.</p>\n<p>But Epic's legal team has put other Apple executives under pressure during the three-week trial. During a cross-examination Thursday, Apple's software chief Craig Federighi lashed out at one of Epic's attorneys who did not allow Federighi to explain the technical details of why Apple does not use automated tools to scan for some offensive content. Judge Gonzalez Rogers intervened to tell Federighi he would have to wait to explain himself later, when Apple's lawyers resumed questions.</p>\n<p>Competition authorities in multiple countries have opened probes into the business, including a case in the European Union around Apple's treatment of Spotify.</p>\n<p>In United States, lawmakers such as Senator Amy Klobuchar who are contemplating new antitrust laws are likely to comb through the records generated in the Epic case.</p>\n<p>\"This case has always been part of a bigger narrative rather than something that's going to decide the issue on its own,\" said John Bergmayer, legal director at consumer advocacy group Public Knowledge.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2137290933","content_text":"May 21 (Reuters) - Apple Inc Chief Executive Tim Cook on Friday will take the witness stand to defend the App Store, a booming part of the iPhone maker's business that \"Fortnite\" maker Epic Games says is a monopoly that Apple abuses.\nCook is expected to spend more than two hours making what are likely to be his most extensive public remarks on the App Store business, which anchors Apple's $53.8 billion services business.\nEpic has waged a public relations and legal campaign, arguing that Apple acts anticompetitively by only allowing apps it approves on the world's 1 billion iPhones and by forcing developers to use Apple's in-app payment system, which charges commissions of up to 30% on sales.\nThe antitrust trial at a federal courthouse in Oakland, California comes as Apple faces a chorus of criticism from app makers including music service Spotify Technology(SPOT.N)and U.S. politicians who say the most valuable public company in the United States tries to squash small competition.\nThe maker of \"Fortnite,\" which pits players against in each other in an animated \"Battle Royale\" fight to the last survivor, is led by CEO Tim Sweeney, who has reveled in the public opportunity to take on Apple.\nSweeney kicked off the trial as Epic's first witness, using his time on the stand to argue that \"Fortnite\" has become a place for players to gather in a virtual world he calls the \"metaverse\" and that Apple is unfairly demanding an outsized cut of profits for providing simple payment processing technology.\nCook fielded a handful of questions about the company's App Store when he testified before U.S. lawmakers last year, but he otherwise stayed mostly silent as lawmakers grilled the chiefs of Alphabet Inc's Google and Facebook Inc.\nApple attorneys said they plan to ask him to testify about Apple's corporate values, how the App Store came about and Apple's competitive landscape. Throughout the trial, Apple has sought to persuade Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers that whatever rules it imposes on developers are aimed at keeping its customers' information private and safe from malware.\nBut Epic's legal team has put other Apple executives under pressure during the three-week trial. During a cross-examination Thursday, Apple's software chief Craig Federighi lashed out at one of Epic's attorneys who did not allow Federighi to explain the technical details of why Apple does not use automated tools to scan for some offensive content. Judge Gonzalez Rogers intervened to tell Federighi he would have to wait to explain himself later, when Apple's lawyers resumed questions.\nCompetition authorities in multiple countries have opened probes into the business, including a case in the European Union around Apple's treatment of Spotify.\nIn United States, lawmakers such as Senator Amy Klobuchar who are contemplating new antitrust laws are likely to comb through the records generated in the Epic case.\n\"This case has always been part of a bigger narrative rather than something that's going to decide the issue on its own,\" said John Bergmayer, legal director at consumer advocacy group Public Knowledge.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":129,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":133222540,"gmtCreate":1621756652480,"gmtModify":1704362138013,"author":{"id":"3549802203532457","authorId":"3549802203532457","name":"KasonT","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/00ff9ff5035d964b869c0d61a8e87f94","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3549802203532457","idStr":"3549802203532457"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hmmm","listText":"Hmmm","text":"Hmmm","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/133222540","repostId":"1159725394","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1159725394","pubTimestamp":1621596616,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1159725394?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-05-21 19:30","market":"us","language":"en","title":"4 reasons you may want to buy Apple ahead of its annual developers conference","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1159725394","media":"CNBC","summary":"Apple’s stock could soon see a wave of positive catalysts, according to one trader.Apple is expected to unveil new operating systems for devices including the Mac, iPad, Apple Watch and Apple TV at its annual developers conference, which Gordon sees as a possible boon for the stock.Add in rumors of a new iPhone and redesigned MacBook Pro coming later this year, and the fundamentals largely support an upside move in the stock, he said.“Apple has 30% of the 5G smartphone market right now and it’s ","content":"<div>\n<p>Apple’s stock could soon see a wave of positive catalysts, according to one trader.\nFour things in particular make it a particularly attractive buy ahead of its June 7 worldwide developers conference,...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/05/21/-apple-wwdc-four-reasons-you-may-want-to-buy-apple-stock-soon.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"cnbc_highlight","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>4 reasons you may want to buy Apple ahead of its annual developers conference</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n4 reasons you may want to buy Apple ahead of its annual developers conference\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-05-21 19:30 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.cnbc.com/2021/05/21/-apple-wwdc-four-reasons-you-may-want-to-buy-apple-stock-soon.html><strong>CNBC</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Apple’s stock could soon see a wave of positive catalysts, according to one trader.\nFour things in particular make it a particularly attractive buy ahead of its June 7 worldwide developers conference,...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/05/21/-apple-wwdc-four-reasons-you-may-want-to-buy-apple-stock-soon.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/05/21/-apple-wwdc-four-reasons-you-may-want-to-buy-apple-stock-soon.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/72bb72e1b84c09fca865c6dcb1bbcd16","article_id":"1159725394","content_text":"Apple’s stock could soon see a wave of positive catalysts, according to one trader.\nFour things in particular make it a particularly attractive buy ahead of its June 7 worldwide developers conference, TradingAnalysis.com founder Todd Gordon told CNBC’s“Trading Nation”on Thursday.\n1. Fundamentals\nApple is expected to unveil new operating systems for devices including the Mac, iPad, Apple Watch and Apple TV at its annual developers conference, which Gordon sees as a possible boon for the stock.\nAdd in rumors of a new iPhone and redesigned MacBook Pro coming later this year, and the fundamentals largely support an upside move in the stock, he said.\n“Apple has 30% of the 5G smartphone market right now and it’s growing,” Gordon said. “The Q2 earnings blew expectations away. They had double-digit growth rates across all product categories.”\n2. Market dynamics\nThough rising Treasury yields have put pressure on the technology trade in recent weeks, that correlation may be weakening, Gordon said.\n“After the initial move up in March of ’21, yields have gone nowhere. They’ve just gone sideways for two months,” he said.\n\n“We might see a push up in interest rates, but I think the market is starting to expect that, and the initial shock of a sharp move up in rates won’t be as drastic as we see it continue to move up,” he said.\n3. Sector rotation\nHe says a chart showing the sector SPDR ETFs for financials, materials, discretionary and tech rotating in and out of favor is showing an improving outlook for tech.\n\n“In late April into May we saw a very big move into financials and materials,” Gordon said. “We’re starting to see a really nice move into technology. As we head up into [the blue] quadrant, this is the improving quadrant. This is the early sign of a possible rotation back in.”\n4. Technicals\nApple’s stock has also been forming a pattern that plays into Elliott wave theory, a type of predictive technical analysis based on recurring price movements, Gordon said.\nHe said the stock has formed a five-wave pattern while consolidating that could signal a sharp upward move.\n“It looks like we could begin to push higher from this consolidation pattern,” Gordon said.\n\n“If we break below $116.20 in Apple, this pattern is invalid. I would use that as a stop loss,” he said. “I think the upside, using multiple projections that we use, gets you up just south of $200 in Apple. I think that could happen over the next six to nine months in Apple.”\nApple closed at $127.31 on Thursday.\n“For those four reasons, I do think Apple is a buy with a very defined risk, only about $10 from current market prices,” Gordon said. “We could move up, say, $60, $70 from here.”","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":98,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":130669657,"gmtCreate":1621537706779,"gmtModify":1704359254346,"author":{"id":"3549802203532457","authorId":"3549802203532457","name":"KasonT","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/00ff9ff5035d964b869c0d61a8e87f94","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3549802203532457","idStr":"3549802203532457"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hmmmm","listText":"Hmmmm","text":"Hmmmm","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/130669657","repostId":"2136920483","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":95,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":197197328,"gmtCreate":1621432610664,"gmtModify":1704357559783,"author":{"id":"3549802203532457","authorId":"3549802203532457","name":"KasonT","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/00ff9ff5035d964b869c0d61a8e87f94","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3549802203532457","idStr":"3549802203532457"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Wow","listText":"Wow","text":"Wow","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/197197328","repostId":"1107558091","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1107558091","pubTimestamp":1621420211,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1107558091?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-05-19 18:30","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Crypto Tumble Wipes $600 Billion Off Digital Tokens in a Week","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1107558091","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"Musk’s Bitcoin criticism, China crypto warning shake sector\nBitcoin now down almost 40% from its mid","content":"<ul>\n <li>Musk’s Bitcoin criticism, China crypto warning shake sector</li>\n <li>Bitcoin now down almost 40% from its mid-April $64,870 record</li>\n</ul>\n<p>Virtual currencies are retreating so broadly and sharply, it’s testing the durability of the cryptocurrency boom.</p>\n<p>The value of more than 7,000 tokens tracked by CoinGecko has shrunk more than $600 billion in the past week to $1.9 trillion. Bitcoin, the largest cryptocurrency, slid some 11% Wednesday to break below $40,000 and is now about $25,000 off its record high set in April.</p>\n<p>Multiple factors are at play, ranging from criticism of the environmental impact of Bitcoin’s energy usage by onetime proponent Elon Musk, to the risk of a regulatory squeeze on what some have called the Wild West of investing. Digital tokens have also delivered gains so fat that some traders may have been taking profits.</p>\n<p>The $40,000 mark is a “critical make-or-break pivot level” for Bitcoin and a decline to just below $30,000 isn’t out of the question, Jeffrey Halley, senior market analyst at Oanda, wrote in a note.</p>\n<p>Here’s a snapshot of the crypto retreat:</p>\n<p><b>Market Value</b></p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a49fce5743e9333e0d461e7f0aad637d\" tg-width=\"952\" tg-height=\"522\"></p>\n<p>Early in April, the value of cryptocurrencies breached $2 trillion for the first time, doubling in about two months on optimism institutional investors were increasingly interested. The current weakness has erased over $600 billion.</p>\n<p><b>Breaking $40,000</b></p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4c667f867f5d3f835b4482176bfd5312\" tg-width=\"930\" tg-height=\"523\"></p>\n<p>Bitcoin tested its 200-day moving average, and its discount to the 120-day average is the biggest since last year, according to Mike McGlone, a commodity strategist at Bloomberg Intelligence in New York. He sees the Bitcoin price settling around the 2021 average of approximately $49,000.</p>\n<p><b>Futures</b></p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/37378d124d57d3cc139ca134fc782b6d\" tg-width=\"930\" tg-height=\"523\"></p>\n<p>In Bitcoin futures, technicians see a bearish head-and-shoulders pattern, which could point to more weakness ahead.</p>\n<p><b>Bitcoin Versus Gold</b></p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1f426bc7dc3e4eea6d36aee4b7bf9aa7\" tg-width=\"930\" tg-height=\"523\"></p>\n<p>The ratio of Bitcoin’s price relative to gold has dropped to the lowest since early February. That’s come amid greater caution about speculative assets as well as the post-pandemic economic recovery. Bitcoin’s proponents argue it’s a modern-day store of value, a claim belied by the token’s volatility.</p>\n<p><b>Ether Trade</b></p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e3be0dce1e4ad3d851c42ddf515d3838\" tg-width=\"930\" tg-height=\"523\"></p>\n<p>After Bitcoin pulled back from a mid-April high, an ongoing rally in Ether -- the second-largest cryptocurrency -- drew attention. But that has also stalled. Chris Weston, head of research at Pepperstone Group Ltd. in Melbourne, wrote in a note Monday that he was closing a short Bitcoin/long Ether trade as the “dust really needs to settle.”</p>\n<p><b>Largest Fund</b></p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4f6356fdb46cbe22da222b5fc5066fd8\" tg-width=\"930\" tg-height=\"523\"></p>\n<p>The&nbsp;Grayscale Bitcoin Trust, the largest Bitcoin fund, is sitting on close to a record discount to net asset value. That gap could disappear if it converts as planned to an exchange-traded fund. However, risks for a wider discount include uncertainty over whether U.S. officials will ever allow Bitcoin ETFs.</p>","source":"lsy1584095487587","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Crypto Tumble Wipes $600 Billion Off Digital Tokens in a Week</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nCrypto Tumble Wipes $600 Billion Off Digital Tokens in a Week\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-05-19 18:30 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-05-19/crypto-tumble-wipes-600-billion-off-digital-tokens-in-a-week?srnd=premium-asia><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Musk’s Bitcoin criticism, China crypto warning shake sector\nBitcoin now down almost 40% from its mid-April $64,870 record\n\nVirtual currencies are retreating so broadly and sharply, it’s testing the ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-05-19/crypto-tumble-wipes-600-billion-off-digital-tokens-in-a-week?srnd=premium-asia\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"PYPL":"PayPal","COIN":"Coinbase Global, Inc.","SQ":"Block","GBTC":"Grayscale Bitcoin Trust","TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-05-19/crypto-tumble-wipes-600-billion-off-digital-tokens-in-a-week?srnd=premium-asia","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1107558091","content_text":"Musk’s Bitcoin criticism, China crypto warning shake sector\nBitcoin now down almost 40% from its mid-April $64,870 record\n\nVirtual currencies are retreating so broadly and sharply, it’s testing the durability of the cryptocurrency boom.\nThe value of more than 7,000 tokens tracked by CoinGecko has shrunk more than $600 billion in the past week to $1.9 trillion. Bitcoin, the largest cryptocurrency, slid some 11% Wednesday to break below $40,000 and is now about $25,000 off its record high set in April.\nMultiple factors are at play, ranging from criticism of the environmental impact of Bitcoin’s energy usage by onetime proponent Elon Musk, to the risk of a regulatory squeeze on what some have called the Wild West of investing. Digital tokens have also delivered gains so fat that some traders may have been taking profits.\nThe $40,000 mark is a “critical make-or-break pivot level” for Bitcoin and a decline to just below $30,000 isn’t out of the question, Jeffrey Halley, senior market analyst at Oanda, wrote in a note.\nHere’s a snapshot of the crypto retreat:\nMarket Value\n\nEarly in April, the value of cryptocurrencies breached $2 trillion for the first time, doubling in about two months on optimism institutional investors were increasingly interested. The current weakness has erased over $600 billion.\nBreaking $40,000\n\nBitcoin tested its 200-day moving average, and its discount to the 120-day average is the biggest since last year, according to Mike McGlone, a commodity strategist at Bloomberg Intelligence in New York. He sees the Bitcoin price settling around the 2021 average of approximately $49,000.\nFutures\n\nIn Bitcoin futures, technicians see a bearish head-and-shoulders pattern, which could point to more weakness ahead.\nBitcoin Versus Gold\n\nThe ratio of Bitcoin’s price relative to gold has dropped to the lowest since early February. That’s come amid greater caution about speculative assets as well as the post-pandemic economic recovery. Bitcoin’s proponents argue it’s a modern-day store of value, a claim belied by the token’s volatility.\nEther Trade\n\nAfter Bitcoin pulled back from a mid-April high, an ongoing rally in Ether -- the second-largest cryptocurrency -- drew attention. But that has also stalled. Chris Weston, head of research at Pepperstone Group Ltd. in Melbourne, wrote in a note Monday that he was closing a short Bitcoin/long Ether trade as the “dust really needs to settle.”\nLargest Fund\n\nThe Grayscale Bitcoin Trust, the largest Bitcoin fund, is sitting on close to a record discount to net asset value. That gap could disappear if it converts as planned to an exchange-traded fund. However, risks for a wider discount include uncertainty over whether U.S. officials will ever allow Bitcoin ETFs.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":547,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":198255710,"gmtCreate":1620964454630,"gmtModify":1704351244798,"author":{"id":"3549802203532457","authorId":"3549802203532457","name":"KasonT","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/00ff9ff5035d964b869c0d61a8e87f94","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3549802203532457","idStr":"3549802203532457"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Interesting, if there do so it will change a lot of things","listText":"Interesting, if there do so it will change a lot of things","text":"Interesting, if there do so it will change a lot of things","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/198255710","repostId":"2135685676","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2135685676","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1620954458,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2135685676?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-05-14 09:07","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Samsung BioLogics says no decision yet on producing Moderna's COVID-19 shot","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2135685676","media":"Reuters","summary":"SEOUL, May 14 (Reuters) - Samsung BioLogics Co Ltd said on Friday that no decision has been made yet","content":"<p>SEOUL, May 14 (Reuters) - Samsung BioLogics Co Ltd&nbsp;said on Friday that no decision has been made yet on producing Moderna Inc's    COVID-19 vaccine in South Korea after a local newspaper reported the two companies had agreed on a contract manufacturing deal.</p><p>The Chosun Ilbo reported that the biotech arm of Samsung Group has agreed to produce the Moderna vaccine in its plant in Songdo, part of which will be used for domestic vaccination, citing unnamed government and pharmaceutical industry sources.</p><p>Samsung BioLogics said in a filing to the stock exchange that it could confirm the report as no decision has been finalised. The decision will be made within a <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE\">one</a>-month time frame, a company official told Reuters by phone.</p><p>The statement follows a denial by Samsung and Pfizer Inc</p><p>earlier this week of another media report that the two companies were working together to produce a COVID-19 vaccine developed by the U.S. firm and its German partner BioNTech.</p><p>The Moderna shot has yet to be approved in South Korea, but the second of three expert panels recommended approval for emergency use of the vaccine on Thursday, based on its safety and efficacy in Phase 3 late-stage trials in the United States.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Samsung BioLogics says no decision yet on producing Moderna's COVID-19 shot</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSamsung BioLogics says no decision yet on producing Moderna's COVID-19 shot\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-05-14 09:07</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>SEOUL, May 14 (Reuters) - Samsung BioLogics Co Ltd&nbsp;said on Friday that no decision has been made yet on producing Moderna Inc's    COVID-19 vaccine in South Korea after a local newspaper reported the two companies had agreed on a contract manufacturing deal.</p><p>The Chosun Ilbo reported that the biotech arm of Samsung Group has agreed to produce the Moderna vaccine in its plant in Songdo, part of which will be used for domestic vaccination, citing unnamed government and pharmaceutical industry sources.</p><p>Samsung BioLogics said in a filing to the stock exchange that it could confirm the report as no decision has been finalised. The decision will be made within a <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE\">one</a>-month time frame, a company official told Reuters by phone.</p><p>The statement follows a denial by Samsung and Pfizer Inc</p><p>earlier this week of another media report that the two companies were working together to produce a COVID-19 vaccine developed by the U.S. firm and its German partner BioNTech.</p><p>The Moderna shot has yet to be approved in South Korea, but the second of three expert panels recommended approval for emergency use of the vaccine on Thursday, based on its safety and efficacy in Phase 3 late-stage trials in the United States.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"MRNA":"Moderna, Inc."},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2135685676","content_text":"SEOUL, May 14 (Reuters) - Samsung BioLogics Co Ltd said on Friday that no decision has been made yet on producing Moderna Inc's    COVID-19 vaccine in South Korea after a local newspaper reported the two companies had agreed on a contract manufacturing deal.The Chosun Ilbo reported that the biotech arm of Samsung Group has agreed to produce the Moderna vaccine in its plant in Songdo, part of which will be used for domestic vaccination, citing unnamed government and pharmaceutical industry sources.Samsung BioLogics said in a filing to the stock exchange that it could confirm the report as no decision has been finalised. The decision will be made within a one-month time frame, a company official told Reuters by phone.The statement follows a denial by Samsung and Pfizer Incearlier this week of another media report that the two companies were working together to produce a COVID-19 vaccine developed by the U.S. firm and its German partner BioNTech.The Moderna shot has yet to be approved in South Korea, but the second of three expert panels recommended approval for emergency use of the vaccine on Thursday, based on its safety and efficacy in Phase 3 late-stage trials in the United States.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":342,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":198252371,"gmtCreate":1620964257393,"gmtModify":1704351243979,"author":{"id":"3549802203532457","authorId":"3549802203532457","name":"KasonT","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/00ff9ff5035d964b869c0d61a8e87f94","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3549802203532457","idStr":"3549802203532457"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hmmm","listText":"Hmmm","text":"Hmmm","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/198252371","repostId":"2135769416","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2135769416","pubTimestamp":1620955813,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2135769416?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-05-14 09:30","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Array Stock Could Rise in the Long Run Despite Near-Term Uncertainty, Says J.P. Morgan","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2135769416","media":"TipRanks","summary":"Commodity prices are on the rise. The price of steel, for instance, is up by 10% since the start of ","content":"<div>\n<p>Commodity prices are on the rise. The price of steel, for instance, is up by 10% since the start of April and has increased by more than 100% year-over-year. Freight costs have also surged - ocean ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/array-stock-could-rise-long-005413064.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"yahoofinance","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Array Stock Could Rise in the Long Run Despite Near-Term Uncertainty, Says J.P. Morgan</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nArray Stock Could Rise in the Long Run Despite Near-Term Uncertainty, Says J.P. Morgan\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-05-14 09:30 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/array-stock-could-rise-long-005413064.html><strong>TipRanks</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Commodity prices are on the rise. The price of steel, for instance, is up by 10% since the start of April and has increased by more than 100% year-over-year. Freight costs have also surged - ocean ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/array-stock-could-rise-long-005413064.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"MS":"摩根士丹利","ARRY":"Array Technologies Inc."},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/array-stock-could-rise-long-005413064.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5f26f4a48f9cb3e29be4d71d3ba8c038","article_id":"2135769416","content_text":"Commodity prices are on the rise. The price of steel, for instance, is up by 10% since the start of April and has increased by more than 100% year-over-year. Freight costs have also surged - ocean freight is up by over 145% in the past year and truck freight costs have increased by over 30%.\nThese issues are a problem for Array Technologies (ARRY) - steel makes up almost half of the company’s COGS (cost of goods sold). The company reported Q1 earnings on Tuesday and cited the price hikes and an ongoing assessment of open contracts as the reasons why it has taken FY21 guidance off the table.\nThe rest of the quarter’s financials weren’t great but that was expected. Revenue dropped by 43.8% year-over-year to $245.93 million yet still beat the Street’s forecast by $7.07 million. Non-GAAP EPS hit $0.19, one cent below the consensus estimate.\nJ.P. Morgan’s Paul Coster remains a fan of the solar power equipment maker, but acknowledges the supply chain costs are creating a cloudy near-term outlook.\n“Demand remains at record levels and the company is not being squeezed by existing contracts, but rather faces uncertainty regarding the timing and profitability of unsigned contracts, which may potentially be delayed beyond prior expectations. We are lowering our estimates accordingly to factor in this uncertainty, though are subject to change based on dynamic macro factors,” Coster noted.\nAccordingly, Coster reduced his FY21 EBITDA estimate from $173 million to $84 million.\nThere’s also a slash to the stock price target which drops from $46 to $40. That said, following Wednesday’s bloodbath, there’s still potential upside of 177% from current levels. Coster’s rating stays an Overweight (i.e. Buy). (To watch Coster’s track record, click here)\nLooking at the consensus breakdown, based on 4 Buys and Holds, each, plus 1 Sell, ARRY stock has a Moderate Buy consensus rating. The analysts evidently think the shares are currently undervalued; going by the $33.56 average price target, the stock is expected to be changing hands for a 132% premium a year from now. (See ARRY stock analysis on TipRanks)\n\nTo find good ideas for stocks trading at attractive valuations, visit TipRanks’ Best Stocks to Buy, a newly launched tool that unites all of TipRanks’ equity insights.\nDisclaimer: The opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the featured analyst. The content is intended to be used for informational purposes only. It is very important to do your own analysis before making any investment.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":214,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":102584213,"gmtCreate":1620224312432,"gmtModify":1704340449873,"author":{"id":"3549802203532457","authorId":"3549802203532457","name":"KasonT","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/00ff9ff5035d964b869c0d61a8e87f94","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3549802203532457","authorIdStr":"3549802203532457"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Cool","listText":"Cool","text":"Cool","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/102584213","repostId":"2132510807","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2132510807","pubTimestamp":1620181244,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2132510807?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-05-05 10:20","market":"us","language":"en","title":"5 High-Yield Dividend Stocks to Watch","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2132510807","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"These stocks don't have much in common other than what matters -- great dividends and solid fundamentals.","content":"<p><b>AT&amp;T </b>(NYSE:<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/T\">$(T)$</a>), <b>W.P. Carey</b> (NYSE:<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/WPC\">$(WPC)$</a>), <b>Sabra Health Care</b> (NASDAQ:<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SBRA\">$(SBRA)$</a>), <b>Williams Companies</b> (NYSE:<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/WMB\">$(WMB)$</a>), and <b>TFS Financial</b> (NASDAQ:<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TFSL\">$(TFSL)$</a>) all have dividends with yields above 5% and a solid history of raising their dividends. These stocks are worth looking over as they should provide ample total returns for patient investors.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7ca30244a38118ae17e4000358cd0379\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"494\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>Image source: Getty Images.</p><h2><b>1. AT&amp;T: High dividends are calling</b></h2><p>AT&amp;T is a Dividend Aristocrat that has been a bargain this year, but it may not stay that way for long. The telecommunications giant has lagged the <b>S&amp;P 500</b> index and is up a little more than 5% over the past 12 months, but up more than 9% in 2021. The company has raised its dividend for 36 consecutive years and currently has a yield of 6.64%.</p><p>Revenue was a reported $43.9 billion in the first quarter of 2021, up 2.7% year over year. Net income grew to $7.9 billion, up 60% over the same period in 2020, and the company's free cash flow was listed as $5.9 billion, up 51% year over year. The dividend payout is safe, with a ratio of 63.5%.</p><p>All three segments of the company's business have seen growth. In communications, the company had 64.8 million postpaid phone subscribers, up 0.76% sequentially. Revenue was $28.1 billion, up 5.2% year over year. The WarnerMedia segment had revenue of $8.5 billion, up 9.8% year over year. The company's Latin America segment had $1.3 billion in revenue compared to $1.28 billion in the same quarter of 2020.</p><p>The biggest concern about AT&amp;T is its debt. It has $160.6 billion in long-term debt, up 4% sequentially. Its annualized net debt-to-adjusted EBITDA is 3.13, compared to 2.63 last year. On the first-quarter earnings call, CFO Pascal Desroches said that the company plans to focus on paying down that debt this year.</p><h2><b>2. W.P. Carey: A raise every quarter</b></h2><p>W.P. Carey has seen its stock rise more than 24% over the past 12 months and more than 7% this year. The company's dividend offers a yield of 5.6%, with a twist: The company has raised its dividend for 79 consecutive quarters, including a bump from $1.046 to $1.048 per share in March. The diversified real estate investment trust (REIT) has 1,274 properties across 25 countries, including industrial, warehouse, retail, office, and self-storage properties.</p><p>The company has seen growth in adjusted funds from operations (AFFO) the past three quarters, though its fourth-quarter AFFO of $212.6 million is down 4% year over year. Its AFFO in 2020 was $4.74 per diluted share, down 5.2% from 2019. The company was pretty much unfazed by the pandemic -- its low came when it received 96% of contractual rent in May, but in the fourth quarter, that number was back up to 99%, followed by 98% in January.</p><p>It has not only raised its quarterly dividend for 23 consecutive years, but its AFFO payout ratio (trailing 12 months) is 88.19, conservative for a REIT.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b9522ac8783b80e9beb8eb160a591309\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"486\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">Data by YCharts.</p><h2><b>3. Sabra Healthcare: A growing trend that's hard to ignore</b></h2><p>Sabra Healthcare, a REIT that specializes in medical facilities, cut its dividend last year from $0.45 to $0.30, and has yet to raise it again. But even with that trim, the yield on the company's dividend it 6.6%. The pandemic made for a challenging year for REITs that focus on nursing homes, and Sabra -- which owns nursing homes, senior living facilities, and specialty hospitals -- is continuing to deal with the headwinds. Many people are still reluctant to live in nursing homes, and in the fourth quarter, total occupancy&nbsp;dropped to 80.2%, down 8.6% year over year.</p><p>Other discouraging numbers: The company's AFFO per share for the year was $1.74, down from $2.08 the year before. And for the fourth quarter, the company issued bleak guidance of $0.38-$0.39 of AFFO per share, compared to $0.42 in the fourth quarter of 2020.</p><p>So why is Sabra worth watching? I think the paltry 4% rise in the company's stock this year presents an opportunity because the company's fundamentals are still strong. Sabra collected 99% of its rents from the beginning of the pandemic through February of 2021. As for the dividend, it is well covered with a payout ratio of 73% of normalized AFFO per share. The company also did a good job of lowering its debt, knocking down its net debt-to-adjusted EBITDA ratio from 5.7 to 4.9.</p><p>The long-term prognosis for nursing homes is still a growth trend, as our population continues to age. The pandemic reversed the growth of occupancy for nursing homes, but not forever. In the meantime, the company's dividend is a nice reward for waiting for a turnaround.</p><h2><b>4. Williams Companies: A boon to investors</b></h2><p>Williams Companies' stock is up more than 31% over the past 12 months, and more than 21% this year. The company's dividend, which offers a current yield of 6.73% is enticing. The company has raised its dividend the past five years.</p><p>The company delivers 30% of the country's natural gas through its more than 30,000 miles of pipelines. Last year was a difficult <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE\">one</a> for oil and gas companies, with oil and natural gas prices down, but Williams Companies still improved its numbers over 2019 by reducing capital expenditures. Its adjusted EBITDA of $5.1 million was up 2% year over year, while its adjusted funds from operations of $3.6 million were up 1% year over year. The company's cash dividend payout ratio, while still precariously high at 87.39%, is down from where it was in 2019.</p><p>The company raised its quarterly dividend 5.3% last year to $0.40 per share, and has already raised it 2.5% this year to $0.41 per share.</p><h2><b>5: TFS Financial: Dividends you can bank on</b></h2><p>TFS Financial, based in Cleveland, is a holding company whose subsidiaries make most of their money from offering mortgage loans, though they also have savings and checking accounts. The company's shares are up more than 10% this year and more than 37% over the past 12 months. Its dividend yields 5.73% with a cash dividend payout ratio (TTM) of 45.9%.</p><p>In 2020, TFS Financial reported annual revenue of $509 million, up only 1.9% year over year, but marking the sixth consecutive year it grew revenue. It also reported annual net income last year of $83 million, up 3.8% over 2019.</p><p>The company has stressed its commitment to its dividend, which has climbed 300% over the past 10 years.</p><h2><b>Making the best of a good situation</b></h2><p>All five of these stocks are worth watching because of their dividend growth and high yields. However, of the quintet, W.P. Carey seems the most solid choice if you look at the company's track record of raising its dividend every quarter, the diversity of its real estate holdings, and the consistency of its cash situation.</p>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>5 High-Yield Dividend Stocks to Watch</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n5 High-Yield Dividend Stocks to Watch\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-05-05 10:20 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/05/04/5-high-yield-dividend-stocks-to-watch/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>AT&T (NYSE:$(T)$), W.P. Carey (NYSE:$(WPC)$), Sabra Health Care (NASDAQ:$(SBRA)$), Williams Companies (NYSE:$(WMB)$), and TFS Financial (NASDAQ:$(TFSL)$) all have dividends with yields above 5% and a ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/05/04/5-high-yield-dividend-stocks-to-watch/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"WMB":"威廉姆斯","T":"美国电话电报","TFSL":"TFS Financial Corporation","WPC":"W. P. Carey Inc","SBRA":"Sabra Healthcare REIT"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/05/04/5-high-yield-dividend-stocks-to-watch/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2132510807","content_text":"AT&T (NYSE:$(T)$), W.P. Carey (NYSE:$(WPC)$), Sabra Health Care (NASDAQ:$(SBRA)$), Williams Companies (NYSE:$(WMB)$), and TFS Financial (NASDAQ:$(TFSL)$) all have dividends with yields above 5% and a solid history of raising their dividends. These stocks are worth looking over as they should provide ample total returns for patient investors.Image source: Getty Images.1. AT&T: High dividends are callingAT&T is a Dividend Aristocrat that has been a bargain this year, but it may not stay that way for long. The telecommunications giant has lagged the S&P 500 index and is up a little more than 5% over the past 12 months, but up more than 9% in 2021. The company has raised its dividend for 36 consecutive years and currently has a yield of 6.64%.Revenue was a reported $43.9 billion in the first quarter of 2021, up 2.7% year over year. Net income grew to $7.9 billion, up 60% over the same period in 2020, and the company's free cash flow was listed as $5.9 billion, up 51% year over year. The dividend payout is safe, with a ratio of 63.5%.All three segments of the company's business have seen growth. In communications, the company had 64.8 million postpaid phone subscribers, up 0.76% sequentially. Revenue was $28.1 billion, up 5.2% year over year. The WarnerMedia segment had revenue of $8.5 billion, up 9.8% year over year. The company's Latin America segment had $1.3 billion in revenue compared to $1.28 billion in the same quarter of 2020.The biggest concern about AT&T is its debt. It has $160.6 billion in long-term debt, up 4% sequentially. Its annualized net debt-to-adjusted EBITDA is 3.13, compared to 2.63 last year. On the first-quarter earnings call, CFO Pascal Desroches said that the company plans to focus on paying down that debt this year.2. W.P. Carey: A raise every quarterW.P. Carey has seen its stock rise more than 24% over the past 12 months and more than 7% this year. The company's dividend offers a yield of 5.6%, with a twist: The company has raised its dividend for 79 consecutive quarters, including a bump from $1.046 to $1.048 per share in March. The diversified real estate investment trust (REIT) has 1,274 properties across 25 countries, including industrial, warehouse, retail, office, and self-storage properties.The company has seen growth in adjusted funds from operations (AFFO) the past three quarters, though its fourth-quarter AFFO of $212.6 million is down 4% year over year. Its AFFO in 2020 was $4.74 per diluted share, down 5.2% from 2019. The company was pretty much unfazed by the pandemic -- its low came when it received 96% of contractual rent in May, but in the fourth quarter, that number was back up to 99%, followed by 98% in January.It has not only raised its quarterly dividend for 23 consecutive years, but its AFFO payout ratio (trailing 12 months) is 88.19, conservative for a REIT.Data by YCharts.3. Sabra Healthcare: A growing trend that's hard to ignoreSabra Healthcare, a REIT that specializes in medical facilities, cut its dividend last year from $0.45 to $0.30, and has yet to raise it again. But even with that trim, the yield on the company's dividend it 6.6%. The pandemic made for a challenging year for REITs that focus on nursing homes, and Sabra -- which owns nursing homes, senior living facilities, and specialty hospitals -- is continuing to deal with the headwinds. Many people are still reluctant to live in nursing homes, and in the fourth quarter, total occupancy dropped to 80.2%, down 8.6% year over year.Other discouraging numbers: The company's AFFO per share for the year was $1.74, down from $2.08 the year before. And for the fourth quarter, the company issued bleak guidance of $0.38-$0.39 of AFFO per share, compared to $0.42 in the fourth quarter of 2020.So why is Sabra worth watching? I think the paltry 4% rise in the company's stock this year presents an opportunity because the company's fundamentals are still strong. Sabra collected 99% of its rents from the beginning of the pandemic through February of 2021. As for the dividend, it is well covered with a payout ratio of 73% of normalized AFFO per share. The company also did a good job of lowering its debt, knocking down its net debt-to-adjusted EBITDA ratio from 5.7 to 4.9.The long-term prognosis for nursing homes is still a growth trend, as our population continues to age. The pandemic reversed the growth of occupancy for nursing homes, but not forever. In the meantime, the company's dividend is a nice reward for waiting for a turnaround.4. Williams Companies: A boon to investorsWilliams Companies' stock is up more than 31% over the past 12 months, and more than 21% this year. The company's dividend, which offers a current yield of 6.73% is enticing. The company has raised its dividend the past five years.The company delivers 30% of the country's natural gas through its more than 30,000 miles of pipelines. Last year was a difficult one for oil and gas companies, with oil and natural gas prices down, but Williams Companies still improved its numbers over 2019 by reducing capital expenditures. Its adjusted EBITDA of $5.1 million was up 2% year over year, while its adjusted funds from operations of $3.6 million were up 1% year over year. The company's cash dividend payout ratio, while still precariously high at 87.39%, is down from where it was in 2019.The company raised its quarterly dividend 5.3% last year to $0.40 per share, and has already raised it 2.5% this year to $0.41 per share.5: TFS Financial: Dividends you can bank onTFS Financial, based in Cleveland, is a holding company whose subsidiaries make most of their money from offering mortgage loans, though they also have savings and checking accounts. The company's shares are up more than 10% this year and more than 37% over the past 12 months. Its dividend yields 5.73% with a cash dividend payout ratio (TTM) of 45.9%.In 2020, TFS Financial reported annual revenue of $509 million, up only 1.9% year over year, but marking the sixth consecutive year it grew revenue. It also reported annual net income last year of $83 million, up 3.8% over 2019.The company has stressed its commitment to its dividend, which has climbed 300% over the past 10 years.Making the best of a good situationAll five of these stocks are worth watching because of their dividend growth and high yields. However, of the quintet, W.P. Carey seems the most solid choice if you look at the company's track record of raising its dividend every quarter, the diversity of its real estate holdings, and the consistency of its cash situation.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":42,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":116554554,"gmtCreate":1622813553278,"gmtModify":1704191681709,"author":{"id":"3549802203532457","authorId":"3549802203532457","name":"KasonT","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/00ff9ff5035d964b869c0d61a8e87f94","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3549802203532457","authorIdStr":"3549802203532457"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Awesome&nbsp;","listText":"Awesome&nbsp;","text":"Awesome","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/116554554","repostId":"1122373606","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1122373606","pubTimestamp":1622793373,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1122373606?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-04 15:56","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Where Will Apple Stock Be In 10 Years? What To Consider","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1122373606","media":"seekingalpha","summary":"Summary\n\nApple has been a great investment over the last decade, but the next decade may look quite ","content":"<p><b>Summary</b></p>\n<ul>\n <li>Apple has been a great investment over the last decade, but the next decade may look quite different.</li>\n <li>Apple has seen its growth slow down over the last decade, and it will likely not be a growth monster in the coming years, either.</li>\n <li>Shares have ample long-term upside, but investors should consider the current valuation before jumping to decisions.</li>\n</ul>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9f2ea192ed76d9772c2c6a820098faf5\" tg-width=\"1536\" tg-height=\"1024\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>Photo by Paopano/iStock Editorial via Getty Images</span></p>\n<p><b>Article Thesis</b></p>\n<p>Apple (AAPL) has been one of the best investments one could have made over the last decade. Over the next decade, its growth may not be the same, however. Yet, thanks to massive shareholder return programs and a move towards services, Apple's stock will likely still be significantly higher a decade from now - even though the current valuation is rather high.</p>\n<p><b>Apple Stock Price</b></p>\n<p>Over the last decade, Apple Inc. has been a great investment:</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5d29aa34bdbc5bab7d0730a4095954e6\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"419\"><span>Data by YCharts</span></p>\n<p>Shares have returned 900% in those ten years, before dividends, for a compounded annual return of approximately 26%, easily trouncing the returns of the broad market during that time frame. Importantly, shares have risen a lot more than the company's market capitalization, which grew by only 550% over the last decade. The difference can be explained by the company's large share repurchase programs, which have lowered the share count drastically over the last decade. The last decade, of course, was a highly successful period for Apple on a business basis, as the company benefited from the rise of smartphones while also having success with new products such as its Watch and tablets, which Apple more or less introduced as a new product category. Right now, shares trade for $125, up 57% over the last twelve months, but down 6% in 2021 to date. Following strong gains during 2020, shares seem to be in a consolidation pattern for now, which is not too much of a surprise, as Apple's valuation had expanded a lot in the recent past, and it seems that the company's business growth has to catch up to the recent share price increases now. The current consensus price target is $156, which implies an upside potential of 25%. Since there are no signs of shares leaving their current trading range right now, I personally do not think that Apple will breach $150 in the near term.</p>\n<p><b>Where Will Apple Stock Be In 10 Years</b></p>\n<p>Apple's stock price in 2031 is, of course, nothing that can be forecasted with any precision. As history has shown, again and again, it is not even possible to forecast share prices precisely over a much shorter period of time. It is, however, possible to craft scenarios to see where share prices could be in the future under certain conditions, to get a feel for what might be a reasonable expectation for the future.</p>\n<p>To craft one such scenario, we have to consider Apple's business growth, Apple's shareholder return program, and the valuation multiple that shares might trade at in the future.</p>\n<p><b>Apple's business growth</b></p>\n<p>Apple Inc. has seen years of stronger growth and years of weaker growth in the past. This mostly can be explained by factors such as new product introductions, e.g. Watch or iPad, and by the strength of the respective current iPhone models, which see varying demand depending on the year. Other factors, such as economic growth or trade issues, play a role as well.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a5b8bd8ef6cdaa13850c1380e870554c\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"419\"><span>Data by YCharts</span></p>\n<p>Overall, revenues have grown by 154% over the last decade, but as we see in the above chart, revenue growth has been relatively uneven. During the early 2010s, Apple generated massive growth on the back of the iPhones \"road to victory\", whereas revenue growth declined to a much slower pace in the following years. There were even some years during which revenues declined on a year-over-year basis, such as 2016. The average annual revenue growth pace was 10% over the last decade, but when we factor in that this was lifted up by the very strong growth in 2011 and 2012, it may not be too reasonable to assume that Apple will grow by 10% a year in the future, too. Investors should also consider that maintaining a high growth rate becomes ever more difficult the larger a company gets. This does, however, not mean that Apple's revenue growth will slow down to zero.</p>\n<p>On the back of price increases for its products and the potential for market share gains in&nbsp;high-growth countries such as China, where more and more people will be able to buy Apple's higher-priced products, it seems reasonable to assume that Apple will generate at least some growth from its core businesses. Add in growth in the services segment - people use their phones more and more, which should lead to higher app spending - and consider the potential for new product launches (although I assume none will be as massive as the iPhone), and Apple should be able to grow its business at a solid pace. I personally assume that a 5%-7% revenue growth rate could be a realistic estimate for the coming years, although some readers will of course have different opinions.</p>\n<p><b>Apple's shareholder returns</b></p>\n<p>Apple has lowered its share count massively in the past, as shown above, and it is, I believe, reasonable to assume that the same will happen going forward. Over the last decade, Apple bought back 36% of its shares. If the same were to happen over the next decade, each remaining share's portion of the company's value would rise by 56%, or 4.6% annualized. Due to the fact that Apple's current valuation is significantly higher than its historic valuation, buybacks could be less impactful in the future, though. Apple has, for example, only reduced its share count by 2.6% over the last year.</p>\n<p>This is why I believe that the share count will not decline by another 36% over the coming decade. When we adjust that downward to 25%, this would result in a ~3% annual tailwind for Apple's growth when we look at per-share metrics, which are the deciding factor for Apple's share price growth. Combined with my 5%-7% business growth estimate, I thus assume that Apple will grow by 8%-10% on a per-share basis in the long term.</p>\n<p><b>Apple's future valuation</b></p>\n<p>AAPL has been valued in a very wide range in the past, seeing its shares trade for very low multiples at some points, whereas investors were willing to pay significantly more at other times:</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/be5cb8bbc04ff0e0a13ee64f6f2bd90a\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"470\"><span>Data by YCharts</span></p>\n<p>Shares could, five years ago, be bought for a very low 10x net earnings, which naturally was a great time to enter or expand positions. In late 2020, however, shares were trading for as much as 40x the company's net earnings, which seems like a quite high valuation. Right now, AAPL trades at 28x trailing earnings, and at around 24x forward profits. In the above chart, we also see the median earnings multiples over the last 3, 5, 7, and 10 years. It is pretty clear that Apple's valuation has expanded over the years, which is why the median values are higher for the shorter \"lookback\" periods. I do not believe that AAPL will trade at the 15.5x net earnings that it has traded at, on average, over the last decade, as this seems like a rather low valuation for a quality company like Apple with a strong brand, massive scale, great margins, and a fortress balance sheet. On the other hand, I also don't believe that Apple will trade at a 24-28x earnings multiple forever - for a company that generates solid but unspectacular business growth in the mid-single-digits, that seems quite expensive. This is especially true when we consider that interest rates will likely be higher a decade from now, which should pressure valuations for all equities, all else equal. I thus believe that a valuation of around 20x net earnings could be a reasonable estimate for 2031, which would be more or less in line with the 3-year median earnings multiple.</p>\n<p><b>Is AAPL A Buy Or Sell Now</b></p>\n<p>Starting our calculation with an EPS estimate of $5.15 for 2021 and assuming that this will grow by 7%-10% a year through 2031, we reach an EPS range of $10.10 to $13.40. Putting a 20x earnings multiple on that leads to a target price of around $200-$270/share. At the midpoint of around $235, shares would thus see gains of around 90% from the current level, or around 6.5% annualized. That surely is not a bad return, and when we add in the dividend, we would get to an annualized return of roughly 7%. This is, on the other hand, also not an outrageously great return, I believe.</p>\n<p>AAPL has, I believe, significant upside potential over the next decade, but that should not be a large surprise - many companies will see significant growth over a time span this long. I personally am not too excited about a 7% expected long-term return. When we consider that shares do have considerable downside risk in the next 1-3 years if Apple's valuation declines, e.g. due to rising interest rates, it may be a better choice to stay on the sidelines for now. Long-term investors will likely not do badly when they buy shares at current levels, but they will likely also not do great. For now, I'd rate Apple a hold, and a potential buy if its valuation comes closer to the longer-term average. Those that are more optimistic about new product launches may disagree and favor buying here, but it could turn out that waiting for a better opportunity is the best choice here.</p>\n<p>Summing it up, I'd say shares do have significant upside potential over the next decade, but the upside potential is not large enough to make me buy shares at current, elevated, valuations.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Where Will Apple Stock Be In 10 Years? What To Consider</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhere Will Apple Stock Be In 10 Years? What To Consider\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-06-04 15:56 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4432703-apple-stock-in-10-years><strong>seekingalpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Summary\n\nApple has been a great investment over the last decade, but the next decade may look quite different.\nApple has seen its growth slow down over the last decade, and it will likely not be a ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4432703-apple-stock-in-10-years\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4432703-apple-stock-in-10-years","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1122373606","content_text":"Summary\n\nApple has been a great investment over the last decade, but the next decade may look quite different.\nApple has seen its growth slow down over the last decade, and it will likely not be a growth monster in the coming years, either.\nShares have ample long-term upside, but investors should consider the current valuation before jumping to decisions.\n\nPhoto by Paopano/iStock Editorial via Getty Images\nArticle Thesis\nApple (AAPL) has been one of the best investments one could have made over the last decade. Over the next decade, its growth may not be the same, however. Yet, thanks to massive shareholder return programs and a move towards services, Apple's stock will likely still be significantly higher a decade from now - even though the current valuation is rather high.\nApple Stock Price\nOver the last decade, Apple Inc. has been a great investment:\nData by YCharts\nShares have returned 900% in those ten years, before dividends, for a compounded annual return of approximately 26%, easily trouncing the returns of the broad market during that time frame. Importantly, shares have risen a lot more than the company's market capitalization, which grew by only 550% over the last decade. The difference can be explained by the company's large share repurchase programs, which have lowered the share count drastically over the last decade. The last decade, of course, was a highly successful period for Apple on a business basis, as the company benefited from the rise of smartphones while also having success with new products such as its Watch and tablets, which Apple more or less introduced as a new product category. Right now, shares trade for $125, up 57% over the last twelve months, but down 6% in 2021 to date. Following strong gains during 2020, shares seem to be in a consolidation pattern for now, which is not too much of a surprise, as Apple's valuation had expanded a lot in the recent past, and it seems that the company's business growth has to catch up to the recent share price increases now. The current consensus price target is $156, which implies an upside potential of 25%. Since there are no signs of shares leaving their current trading range right now, I personally do not think that Apple will breach $150 in the near term.\nWhere Will Apple Stock Be In 10 Years\nApple's stock price in 2031 is, of course, nothing that can be forecasted with any precision. As history has shown, again and again, it is not even possible to forecast share prices precisely over a much shorter period of time. It is, however, possible to craft scenarios to see where share prices could be in the future under certain conditions, to get a feel for what might be a reasonable expectation for the future.\nTo craft one such scenario, we have to consider Apple's business growth, Apple's shareholder return program, and the valuation multiple that shares might trade at in the future.\nApple's business growth\nApple Inc. has seen years of stronger growth and years of weaker growth in the past. This mostly can be explained by factors such as new product introductions, e.g. Watch or iPad, and by the strength of the respective current iPhone models, which see varying demand depending on the year. Other factors, such as economic growth or trade issues, play a role as well.\nData by YCharts\nOverall, revenues have grown by 154% over the last decade, but as we see in the above chart, revenue growth has been relatively uneven. During the early 2010s, Apple generated massive growth on the back of the iPhones \"road to victory\", whereas revenue growth declined to a much slower pace in the following years. There were even some years during which revenues declined on a year-over-year basis, such as 2016. The average annual revenue growth pace was 10% over the last decade, but when we factor in that this was lifted up by the very strong growth in 2011 and 2012, it may not be too reasonable to assume that Apple will grow by 10% a year in the future, too. Investors should also consider that maintaining a high growth rate becomes ever more difficult the larger a company gets. This does, however, not mean that Apple's revenue growth will slow down to zero.\nOn the back of price increases for its products and the potential for market share gains in high-growth countries such as China, where more and more people will be able to buy Apple's higher-priced products, it seems reasonable to assume that Apple will generate at least some growth from its core businesses. Add in growth in the services segment - people use their phones more and more, which should lead to higher app spending - and consider the potential for new product launches (although I assume none will be as massive as the iPhone), and Apple should be able to grow its business at a solid pace. I personally assume that a 5%-7% revenue growth rate could be a realistic estimate for the coming years, although some readers will of course have different opinions.\nApple's shareholder returns\nApple has lowered its share count massively in the past, as shown above, and it is, I believe, reasonable to assume that the same will happen going forward. Over the last decade, Apple bought back 36% of its shares. If the same were to happen over the next decade, each remaining share's portion of the company's value would rise by 56%, or 4.6% annualized. Due to the fact that Apple's current valuation is significantly higher than its historic valuation, buybacks could be less impactful in the future, though. Apple has, for example, only reduced its share count by 2.6% over the last year.\nThis is why I believe that the share count will not decline by another 36% over the coming decade. When we adjust that downward to 25%, this would result in a ~3% annual tailwind for Apple's growth when we look at per-share metrics, which are the deciding factor for Apple's share price growth. Combined with my 5%-7% business growth estimate, I thus assume that Apple will grow by 8%-10% on a per-share basis in the long term.\nApple's future valuation\nAAPL has been valued in a very wide range in the past, seeing its shares trade for very low multiples at some points, whereas investors were willing to pay significantly more at other times:\nData by YCharts\nShares could, five years ago, be bought for a very low 10x net earnings, which naturally was a great time to enter or expand positions. In late 2020, however, shares were trading for as much as 40x the company's net earnings, which seems like a quite high valuation. Right now, AAPL trades at 28x trailing earnings, and at around 24x forward profits. In the above chart, we also see the median earnings multiples over the last 3, 5, 7, and 10 years. It is pretty clear that Apple's valuation has expanded over the years, which is why the median values are higher for the shorter \"lookback\" periods. I do not believe that AAPL will trade at the 15.5x net earnings that it has traded at, on average, over the last decade, as this seems like a rather low valuation for a quality company like Apple with a strong brand, massive scale, great margins, and a fortress balance sheet. On the other hand, I also don't believe that Apple will trade at a 24-28x earnings multiple forever - for a company that generates solid but unspectacular business growth in the mid-single-digits, that seems quite expensive. This is especially true when we consider that interest rates will likely be higher a decade from now, which should pressure valuations for all equities, all else equal. I thus believe that a valuation of around 20x net earnings could be a reasonable estimate for 2031, which would be more or less in line with the 3-year median earnings multiple.\nIs AAPL A Buy Or Sell Now\nStarting our calculation with an EPS estimate of $5.15 for 2021 and assuming that this will grow by 7%-10% a year through 2031, we reach an EPS range of $10.10 to $13.40. Putting a 20x earnings multiple on that leads to a target price of around $200-$270/share. At the midpoint of around $235, shares would thus see gains of around 90% from the current level, or around 6.5% annualized. That surely is not a bad return, and when we add in the dividend, we would get to an annualized return of roughly 7%. This is, on the other hand, also not an outrageously great return, I believe.\nAAPL has, I believe, significant upside potential over the next decade, but that should not be a large surprise - many companies will see significant growth over a time span this long. I personally am not too excited about a 7% expected long-term return. When we consider that shares do have considerable downside risk in the next 1-3 years if Apple's valuation declines, e.g. due to rising interest rates, it may be a better choice to stay on the sidelines for now. Long-term investors will likely not do badly when they buy shares at current levels, but they will likely also not do great. For now, I'd rate Apple a hold, and a potential buy if its valuation comes closer to the longer-term average. Those that are more optimistic about new product launches may disagree and favor buying here, but it could turn out that waiting for a better opportunity is the best choice here.\nSumming it up, I'd say shares do have significant upside potential over the next decade, but the upside potential is not large enough to make me buy shares at current, elevated, valuations.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":433,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":191476377,"gmtCreate":1620903977099,"gmtModify":1704350179131,"author":{"id":"3549802203532457","authorId":"3549802203532457","name":"KasonT","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/00ff9ff5035d964b869c0d61a8e87f94","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3549802203532457","authorIdStr":"3549802203532457"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hmm","listText":"Hmm","text":"Hmm","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/191476377","repostId":"2135253612","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2135253612","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"The leading daily newsletter for the latest financial and business news. 33Yrs Helping Stock Investors with Investing Insights, Tools, News & More.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Investors","id":"1085713068","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/608dd68a89ed486e18f64efe3136266c"},"pubTimestamp":1620902384,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2135253612?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-05-13 18:39","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Disney To Report Earnings As Darkest Clouds Begin To Clear","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2135253612","media":"Investors","summary":"Disney reports fiscal Q2 earnings after the market close Thursday, as the biggest drags on its business finally start to ease.","content":"<p>Entertainment and media conglomerate <b>Disney</b> reports fiscal second-quarter earnings after the market close Thursday, as the biggest drags on its business finally start to ease. Disney stock fell.</p><p><b>Disney Earnings</b></p><p><b>Estimates</b>: Analysts polled by Zacks Investment Research expect EPS of 35 cents, a 42% drop from the year-ago quarter. Revenue is seen falling about 11% to $16.06 billion.</p><p><b>Results</b>: Check back late Thursday.</p><p>The reopening of more theme parks and theaters nationwide should eventually have a positive impact on earnings and Disney stock.</p><p>Parks in Paris and California remained largely closed during Q2. But California theme parks Disneyland and California Adventure reopened on April 30 with capacity limits, after being shut down for more than a year.</p><p>And the reopening of movie theaters in top markets like California and New York should also lift Disney's studio business.</p><p>Meanwhile, the streaming business continues to make gains, and the company reported in early March that Disney+ topped 100 million subscribers.</p><p><b>Disney Stock</b></p><p>Shares slipped 1.6% to 178.85 on the stock market today. Disney stock is working on a buy point of 203.12 from a flat base, according to MarketSmith chart analysis. The relative strength line has returned to pre-pandemic levels but has been trending lower in recent weeks, amid a tough market.</p><p>Disney stock has an RS Rating is 67 out of a possible 99. The EPS Rating is just 10, as park and theater closures hit profits hard.</p><p>Streaming rival <b>Netflix</b> was down 1.6% on Wednesday, and <b>Amazon</b> lost 2% amid a broad market sell-off.</p><p><b>ViacomCBS</b>, which launched its rebranded Paramount+ streaming service in March, edged up 0.1%. Last week, ViacomCBS reported 36 million streaming subscribers, mostly on Paramount+, a gain of 6 million from the prior quarter.</p><p>Pure-play streamer&nbsp;<b>FuboTV</b> jumped 12% after reporting earnings Tuesday.</p><p><b>Big Year Ahead</b></p><p>Bank of America analyst Alexia Quadrani says Disney's legacy business will come into greater focus over the next 12 months as the pace of recovery has an outsize impact on profitability.</p><p>\"In particular, we believe theatrical moviegoing will resume in the back half of 2021, and with pent-up demand, it could lead to better profitability for the studio in the near term,\" she said in an April 21 note.</p><p>Despite the company's recent decision to move some films to streaming or premium on demand, Quadrani says that as the pandemic subsides, she expects Disney to go back to an exclusive theatrical window for its bigger releases, albeit with a shortened window for streaming, likely around 30 to 45 days.</p><p>BofA maintained an overweight rating on Disney stock and a 220 price target.</p><p>Disney+ also should see more streaming gains because shows like \"Wandavision\" and \"The Falcon and the Winter Soldier\" were hits. Disney also released another feature film in Q2 on Disney+ via premium access as well as in theaters.</p><p>While Disney's been aggressively expanding its streaming business, it isn't expected to become profitable until fiscal 2023.&nbsp;Disney expects to notch 230 million to 260 million subscribers by 2024.</p><p>But as the pandemic wanes and more people head to theaters and other entertainment venues, streaming subscriber growth could slow. Netflix added 3.98 million subscribers in Q1, well below the 6.3 million expected.</p><p>\"The pandemic has accelerated the growth of Disney's streaming services in our view, and the company is aggressively building out the content pipeline in order to sustain this growth, with 100 titles a year being released already on Disney+, and targeting a new high-caliber release every week in a few years,\" wrote Quadrani.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Disney To Report Earnings As Darkest Clouds Begin To Clear</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nDisney To Report Earnings As Darkest Clouds Begin To Clear\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/608dd68a89ed486e18f64efe3136266c);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Investors </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-05-13 18:39</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Entertainment and media conglomerate <b>Disney</b> reports fiscal second-quarter earnings after the market close Thursday, as the biggest drags on its business finally start to ease. Disney stock fell.</p><p><b>Disney Earnings</b></p><p><b>Estimates</b>: Analysts polled by Zacks Investment Research expect EPS of 35 cents, a 42% drop from the year-ago quarter. Revenue is seen falling about 11% to $16.06 billion.</p><p><b>Results</b>: Check back late Thursday.</p><p>The reopening of more theme parks and theaters nationwide should eventually have a positive impact on earnings and Disney stock.</p><p>Parks in Paris and California remained largely closed during Q2. But California theme parks Disneyland and California Adventure reopened on April 30 with capacity limits, after being shut down for more than a year.</p><p>And the reopening of movie theaters in top markets like California and New York should also lift Disney's studio business.</p><p>Meanwhile, the streaming business continues to make gains, and the company reported in early March that Disney+ topped 100 million subscribers.</p><p><b>Disney Stock</b></p><p>Shares slipped 1.6% to 178.85 on the stock market today. Disney stock is working on a buy point of 203.12 from a flat base, according to MarketSmith chart analysis. The relative strength line has returned to pre-pandemic levels but has been trending lower in recent weeks, amid a tough market.</p><p>Disney stock has an RS Rating is 67 out of a possible 99. The EPS Rating is just 10, as park and theater closures hit profits hard.</p><p>Streaming rival <b>Netflix</b> was down 1.6% on Wednesday, and <b>Amazon</b> lost 2% amid a broad market sell-off.</p><p><b>ViacomCBS</b>, which launched its rebranded Paramount+ streaming service in March, edged up 0.1%. Last week, ViacomCBS reported 36 million streaming subscribers, mostly on Paramount+, a gain of 6 million from the prior quarter.</p><p>Pure-play streamer&nbsp;<b>FuboTV</b> jumped 12% after reporting earnings Tuesday.</p><p><b>Big Year Ahead</b></p><p>Bank of America analyst Alexia Quadrani says Disney's legacy business will come into greater focus over the next 12 months as the pace of recovery has an outsize impact on profitability.</p><p>\"In particular, we believe theatrical moviegoing will resume in the back half of 2021, and with pent-up demand, it could lead to better profitability for the studio in the near term,\" she said in an April 21 note.</p><p>Despite the company's recent decision to move some films to streaming or premium on demand, Quadrani says that as the pandemic subsides, she expects Disney to go back to an exclusive theatrical window for its bigger releases, albeit with a shortened window for streaming, likely around 30 to 45 days.</p><p>BofA maintained an overweight rating on Disney stock and a 220 price target.</p><p>Disney+ also should see more streaming gains because shows like \"Wandavision\" and \"The Falcon and the Winter Soldier\" were hits. Disney also released another feature film in Q2 on Disney+ via premium access as well as in theaters.</p><p>While Disney's been aggressively expanding its streaming business, it isn't expected to become profitable until fiscal 2023.&nbsp;Disney expects to notch 230 million to 260 million subscribers by 2024.</p><p>But as the pandemic wanes and more people head to theaters and other entertainment venues, streaming subscriber growth could slow. Netflix added 3.98 million subscribers in Q1, well below the 6.3 million expected.</p><p>\"The pandemic has accelerated the growth of Disney's streaming services in our view, and the company is aggressively building out the content pipeline in order to sustain this growth, with 100 titles a year being released already on Disney+, and targeting a new high-caliber release every week in a few years,\" wrote Quadrani.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"DIS":"迪士尼"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2135253612","content_text":"Entertainment and media conglomerate Disney reports fiscal second-quarter earnings after the market close Thursday, as the biggest drags on its business finally start to ease. Disney stock fell.Disney EarningsEstimates: Analysts polled by Zacks Investment Research expect EPS of 35 cents, a 42% drop from the year-ago quarter. Revenue is seen falling about 11% to $16.06 billion.Results: Check back late Thursday.The reopening of more theme parks and theaters nationwide should eventually have a positive impact on earnings and Disney stock.Parks in Paris and California remained largely closed during Q2. But California theme parks Disneyland and California Adventure reopened on April 30 with capacity limits, after being shut down for more than a year.And the reopening of movie theaters in top markets like California and New York should also lift Disney's studio business.Meanwhile, the streaming business continues to make gains, and the company reported in early March that Disney+ topped 100 million subscribers.Disney StockShares slipped 1.6% to 178.85 on the stock market today. Disney stock is working on a buy point of 203.12 from a flat base, according to MarketSmith chart analysis. The relative strength line has returned to pre-pandemic levels but has been trending lower in recent weeks, amid a tough market.Disney stock has an RS Rating is 67 out of a possible 99. The EPS Rating is just 10, as park and theater closures hit profits hard.Streaming rival Netflix was down 1.6% on Wednesday, and Amazon lost 2% amid a broad market sell-off.ViacomCBS, which launched its rebranded Paramount+ streaming service in March, edged up 0.1%. Last week, ViacomCBS reported 36 million streaming subscribers, mostly on Paramount+, a gain of 6 million from the prior quarter.Pure-play streamer FuboTV jumped 12% after reporting earnings Tuesday.Big Year AheadBank of America analyst Alexia Quadrani says Disney's legacy business will come into greater focus over the next 12 months as the pace of recovery has an outsize impact on profitability.\"In particular, we believe theatrical moviegoing will resume in the back half of 2021, and with pent-up demand, it could lead to better profitability for the studio in the near term,\" she said in an April 21 note.Despite the company's recent decision to move some films to streaming or premium on demand, Quadrani says that as the pandemic subsides, she expects Disney to go back to an exclusive theatrical window for its bigger releases, albeit with a shortened window for streaming, likely around 30 to 45 days.BofA maintained an overweight rating on Disney stock and a 220 price target.Disney+ also should see more streaming gains because shows like \"Wandavision\" and \"The Falcon and the Winter Soldier\" were hits. Disney also released another feature film in Q2 on Disney+ via premium access as well as in theaters.While Disney's been aggressively expanding its streaming business, it isn't expected to become profitable until fiscal 2023. Disney expects to notch 230 million to 260 million subscribers by 2024.But as the pandemic wanes and more people head to theaters and other entertainment venues, streaming subscriber growth could slow. Netflix added 3.98 million subscribers in Q1, well below the 6.3 million expected.\"The pandemic has accelerated the growth of Disney's streaming services in our view, and the company is aggressively building out the content pipeline in order to sustain this growth, with 100 titles a year being released already on Disney+, and targeting a new high-caliber release every week in a few years,\" wrote Quadrani.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":191,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":370604924,"gmtCreate":1618578977368,"gmtModify":1704712993574,"author":{"id":"3549802203532457","authorId":"3549802203532457","name":"KasonT","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/00ff9ff5035d964b869c0d61a8e87f94","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3549802203532457","authorIdStr":"3549802203532457"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Interesting&nbsp;","listText":"Interesting&nbsp;","text":"Interesting","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/370604924","repostId":"1131521200","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1131521200","pubTimestamp":1618577973,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1131521200?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-04-16 20:59","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Hedge Fund Billionaire Who Shorted Lehman Brothers Says the Fed and SEC Aren’t Doing Their Jobs","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1131521200","media":"Barron's","summary":"Stocks arehitting record highs, but not everyone is happy. Greenlight Capital’s David Einhorn is ups","content":"<p>Stocks arehitting record highs, but not everyone is happy. Greenlight Capital’s David Einhorn is upset, particularly with regulators. He has a long list of gripes, ranging from the Federal Reserve’s handling of inflation to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s lack of action on everything from Robinhood toGameStop.</p>\n<p>Einhorn’s complaints regarding the Fed are boilerplate. The Fed has the job of keeping inflation in check, but is now willing to let inflation rise above its long-term target. He doesn’t like the new laissez-faire attitude about rising prices.</p>\n<p>But Einhorn’s harshest words in a letter published Thursday were reserved for the SEC. Its job is to ensure fair trading, but Einhorn writes that it seems to have no interest in investigating spikes in the stock prices of tiny companies or statements from prominent figures such asTesla’sElon Musk and Chamath Palihapitiya that he likens to pouring “jet fuel on the GME squeeze.”</p>\n<p>“There is no cop on the beat,” Einhorn writes. “Companies and managements that are emboldened enough to engage in malfeasance have little to fear.”</p>\n<p>With Greenlight returning just 5.2% in 2020—theS&amp;P 500returned 18%— Einhorn’s rant could seem like sour grapes if the issues he raises weren’t so serious.</p>\n<p>Einhorn calls on Congress to grill absentee regulators instead of interviewing Roaring Kitty.</p>\n<p>It would be a start.</p>","source":"lsy1610680873436","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Hedge Fund Billionaire Who Shorted Lehman Brothers Says the Fed and SEC Aren’t Doing Their Jobs</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHedge Fund Billionaire Who Shorted Lehman Brothers Says the Fed and SEC Aren’t Doing Their Jobs\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-04-16 20:59 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.barrons.com/articles/hedge-fund-billionaire-who-shorted-lehman-brothers-says-the-fed-and-sec-arent-doing-their-jobs-51618576593?mod=hp_LATEST><strong>Barron's</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Stocks arehitting record highs, but not everyone is happy. Greenlight Capital’s David Einhorn is upset, particularly with regulators. He has a long list of gripes, ranging from the Federal Reserve’s ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/hedge-fund-billionaire-who-shorted-lehman-brothers-says-the-fed-and-sec-arent-doing-their-jobs-51618576593?mod=hp_LATEST\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SPY":"标普500ETF",".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/hedge-fund-billionaire-who-shorted-lehman-brothers-says-the-fed-and-sec-arent-doing-their-jobs-51618576593?mod=hp_LATEST","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1131521200","content_text":"Stocks arehitting record highs, but not everyone is happy. Greenlight Capital’s David Einhorn is upset, particularly with regulators. He has a long list of gripes, ranging from the Federal Reserve’s handling of inflation to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s lack of action on everything from Robinhood toGameStop.\nEinhorn’s complaints regarding the Fed are boilerplate. The Fed has the job of keeping inflation in check, but is now willing to let inflation rise above its long-term target. He doesn’t like the new laissez-faire attitude about rising prices.\nBut Einhorn’s harshest words in a letter published Thursday were reserved for the SEC. Its job is to ensure fair trading, but Einhorn writes that it seems to have no interest in investigating spikes in the stock prices of tiny companies or statements from prominent figures such asTesla’sElon Musk and Chamath Palihapitiya that he likens to pouring “jet fuel on the GME squeeze.”\n“There is no cop on the beat,” Einhorn writes. “Companies and managements that are emboldened enough to engage in malfeasance have little to fear.”\nWith Greenlight returning just 5.2% in 2020—theS&P 500returned 18%— Einhorn’s rant could seem like sour grapes if the issues he raises weren’t so serious.\nEinhorn calls on Congress to grill absentee regulators instead of interviewing Roaring Kitty.\nIt would be a start.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":70,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":191476558,"gmtCreate":1620904067774,"gmtModify":1704350179788,"author":{"id":"3549802203532457","authorId":"3549802203532457","name":"KasonT","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/00ff9ff5035d964b869c0d61a8e87f94","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3549802203532457","authorIdStr":"3549802203532457"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Completing with coin","listText":"Completing with coin","text":"Completing with coin","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/191476558","repostId":"1164812173","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1164812173","pubTimestamp":1620902395,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1164812173?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-05-13 18:39","market":"fut","language":"en","title":"Silver is up over 70% in a year. Here’s why experts say it could have further to go","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1164812173","media":"cnbc","summary":"KEY POINTS\n\nIt’s often overlooked in favor of its lustrous cousin gold, but the price of silver has ","content":"<div>\n<p>KEY POINTS\n\nIt’s often overlooked in favor of its lustrous cousin gold, but the price of silver has jumped over 70% in the last year\nLeading commodity strategists saying the rally is likely to ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/05/13/silver-price-rockets-as-investment-and-industrial-demand-continues.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"cnbc_highlight","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Silver is up over 70% in a year. Here’s why experts say it could have further to go</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSilver is up over 70% in a year. Here’s why experts say it could have further to go\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-05-13 18:39 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.cnbc.com/2021/05/13/silver-price-rockets-as-investment-and-industrial-demand-continues.html><strong>cnbc</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>KEY POINTS\n\nIt’s often overlooked in favor of its lustrous cousin gold, but the price of silver has jumped over 70% in the last year\nLeading commodity strategists saying the rally is likely to ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/05/13/silver-price-rockets-as-investment-and-industrial-demand-continues.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/05/13/silver-price-rockets-as-investment-and-industrial-demand-continues.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/72bb72e1b84c09fca865c6dcb1bbcd16","article_id":"1164812173","content_text":"KEY POINTS\n\nIt’s often overlooked in favor of its lustrous cousin gold, but the price of silver has jumped over 70% in the last year\nLeading commodity strategists saying the rally is likely to continue as the global economy reopens.\nSilver was trading around $27 an ounce on Wednesday, a 74% rise from a year ago when the spot price was around $15.5 per ounce. Gold prices have risen 6.4% in a year.\n\nIt's often overlooked in favor of its lustrous cousingold, but the price ofsilverhas jumped over 70% in the last year, with commodity strategists saying the rally is likely to continue as the global economy reopens.\nDemand for the precious metal has shot up in the past 12 months. Silver was trading around $27 an ounce on Wednesday, a 74% rise from a year ago when the spot price was around $15.5 per ounce. In comparison, gold prices have risen 6.4% in a year.\nFrom electronics to photography, jewelry and coins, silver is integral to numerous everyday products.\nIts high electrical conductivity and durability gives it industrial and technological applications, with almost every computer, mobile phone, automobile and appliance containing silver,according to the Silver Institute. The association’s data show there has been more demand than supply of the semi-precious metal so far in 2021.\nBut Ole Hanson, head of Commodity Strategy at Saxo Bank, told CNBC that although around 50% of the demand for silver was industrial, the rest came from investors. Still, its uses in industry was one of the main reasons driving its recent rise in value, he said.\n“Industrial demand is probably the main reason why we’ve seen silver outperform gold, as it has over the last year ... part of that (rise) is definitely coming from industrial metals which have really been on a tear. If you look at copper prices, they’ve more than doubled since hitting a low-point last year,” he added.\nAdditional factors have also played into silver’s rise, Hanson said, such as the shift towards green technologies which have spurred a rise in demand for industrial metals such as silver which are used in solar panel production, for instance.\nInflation impact\nThe massive amount of central bank and government stimulus over the last year has also fueled concerns around inflation, with precious metals like gold seen as a hedge against rising prices and a decrease in the value of the dollar. On Wednesday, official U.S. data surprised markets with a bigger-than-expected4.2% rise in consumer prices in April compared a year ago.\n“If gold rallies then silver tends to rally, but even stronger,” Hanson noted. “So most silver investors are probably keeping a close eye on gold prices, the level of the dollar and the level of interest rates.”\nSilver prices remain well-below a record high in 2011 when the metal almost reached the $50 per ounce mark. However Hanson said that,long-term, the demand for silver shows no signs of waning.\n“If we are serious about the green transformation then that will continue to attract demand for silver,” he noted. In the meantime, the supply of silver — usually extracted during the process of mining other metals — is likely to remain restrained.\n“If it catches some decent tailwinds then it can actually run higher and faster than potentially other metals would do.” Hanson added.\nExtreme bullish scenario ‘off the table’ for now\nSilver also stands to gain from the reopening of the global economy following the coronavirus pandemic given a ramp up in industrial production as well as maintained investment demand, according to Max Layton, managing director of Commodities Research at Citi Global Markets.\nHe told CNBC on Tuesday that silver had benefited from investment demand during the pandemic, and was likely to continue to do so.\n“The pandemic resulted in a major decrease in U.S. real interest rates, and a shift in allocations out of wealth and household savings into gold and silver. This more than offset the weakness in industrial consumption, and continues to do so,” he said.\nHowever, he noted that a third wave of Covid-19, largely caused by variants, could continue to dampen industrial demand and “has taken the extreme bullish silver scenario off the table for now.” Nonetheless, Layton said there was scope for silver’s rally to continue.\n“An end to de-stocking in China and India would see the silver market really pick up steam,” he said.\n“The rally can last as long as the world remains concerned about the impact of Covid-19 mutating and concerned about the impact of Covid on the services industry. Both of these concerns can drive policymakers to keep real rates at low levels and can sustain investment demand at high levels.”","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":249,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":891950916,"gmtCreate":1628321151435,"gmtModify":1703505069457,"author":{"id":"3549802203532457","authorId":"3549802203532457","name":"KasonT","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/00ff9ff5035d964b869c0d61a8e87f94","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3549802203532457","authorIdStr":"3549802203532457"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/891950916","repostId":"2157464672","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":405,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":118220971,"gmtCreate":1622734229393,"gmtModify":1704190163006,"author":{"id":"3549802203532457","authorId":"3549802203532457","name":"KasonT","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/00ff9ff5035d964b869c0d61a8e87f94","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3549802203532457","authorIdStr":"3549802203532457"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Wow","listText":"Wow","text":"Wow","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/118220971","repostId":"1150431596","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1150431596","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Stock Market Quotes, Business News, Financial News, Trading Ideas, and Stock Research by Professionals","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Benzinga","id":"1052270027","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa"},"pubTimestamp":1622733096,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1150431596?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-03 23:11","market":"us","language":"en","title":"AMC And GameStop Short Sellers Have Taken A $12B Loss In 2021","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1150431596","media":"Benzinga","summary":"Shares of so-called meme stocks AMC Entertainment Holdings Inc and GameStop Corp. both dropped on Th","content":"<p>Shares of so-called meme stocks&nbsp;<b>AMC Entertainment Holdings Inc</b>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<b>GameStop Corp.</b>&nbsp;both dropped on Thursday morning, providing some relief to short sellers reeling from heavy Wednesday losses.</p>\n<p>AMC shares hit new all-time highs of $72.62 this week as a social media-driven buying frenzy has inflicted major pain on short sellers.</p>\n<p><b>The Numbers:</b>On Wednesday, AMC short sellers took a whopping $2.77 billion loss, according to S3 Partners analyst Ihor Dusaniwsky. That loss brought AMC short sellers’ two-day losses up to $3.3 billion and their 7-day losses up to $4.54 billion.</p>\n<p>Year to date, AMC short sellers have now logged mark-to-market losses of $5.22 billion, Dusaniwsky said.</p>\n<p>AMC’s short interest now stands at about $2.91 billion, or about 18.2% of the stock’s float.</p>\n<p>Even after Wednesday’s big gain by AMC, GameStop short sellers have still taken the heavier blow so far in 2021. Dusaniwsky said GameStop short sellers lost $375.7 million on Wednesday, bringing their year-to-date losses up to $7.15 billion.</p>\n<p>GameStop now has $2.82 billion in short interest, or about 19.8% of the stock’s float.</p>\n<p>As of Wednesday’s close, GameStop and AMC short sellers have endured combined losses of $12.3 billion in 2021, according to S3.</p>\n<p><b>Benzinga’s Take:</b>AMC itself warned investors on Thursday that investing in its stock at current prices could result in them losing “all or a substantial portion” of their money.</p>\n<p>Given the unprecedented trading action in both AMC and GameStop so far in 2021, it’s difficult to have too much sympathy for anyone who is short either stock at this point.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>AMC And GameStop Short Sellers Have Taken A $12B Loss In 2021</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAMC And GameStop Short Sellers Have Taken A $12B Loss In 2021\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Benzinga </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-06-03 23:11</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Shares of so-called meme stocks&nbsp;<b>AMC Entertainment Holdings Inc</b>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<b>GameStop Corp.</b>&nbsp;both dropped on Thursday morning, providing some relief to short sellers reeling from heavy Wednesday losses.</p>\n<p>AMC shares hit new all-time highs of $72.62 this week as a social media-driven buying frenzy has inflicted major pain on short sellers.</p>\n<p><b>The Numbers:</b>On Wednesday, AMC short sellers took a whopping $2.77 billion loss, according to S3 Partners analyst Ihor Dusaniwsky. That loss brought AMC short sellers’ two-day losses up to $3.3 billion and their 7-day losses up to $4.54 billion.</p>\n<p>Year to date, AMC short sellers have now logged mark-to-market losses of $5.22 billion, Dusaniwsky said.</p>\n<p>AMC’s short interest now stands at about $2.91 billion, or about 18.2% of the stock’s float.</p>\n<p>Even after Wednesday’s big gain by AMC, GameStop short sellers have still taken the heavier blow so far in 2021. Dusaniwsky said GameStop short sellers lost $375.7 million on Wednesday, bringing their year-to-date losses up to $7.15 billion.</p>\n<p>GameStop now has $2.82 billion in short interest, or about 19.8% of the stock’s float.</p>\n<p>As of Wednesday’s close, GameStop and AMC short sellers have endured combined losses of $12.3 billion in 2021, according to S3.</p>\n<p><b>Benzinga’s Take:</b>AMC itself warned investors on Thursday that investing in its stock at current prices could result in them losing “all or a substantial portion” of their money.</p>\n<p>Given the unprecedented trading action in both AMC and GameStop so far in 2021, it’s difficult to have too much sympathy for anyone who is short either stock at this point.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"GME":"游戏驿站","AMC":"AMC院线"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1150431596","content_text":"Shares of so-called meme stocks AMC Entertainment Holdings Inc and GameStop Corp. both dropped on Thursday morning, providing some relief to short sellers reeling from heavy Wednesday losses.\nAMC shares hit new all-time highs of $72.62 this week as a social media-driven buying frenzy has inflicted major pain on short sellers.\nThe Numbers:On Wednesday, AMC short sellers took a whopping $2.77 billion loss, according to S3 Partners analyst Ihor Dusaniwsky. That loss brought AMC short sellers’ two-day losses up to $3.3 billion and their 7-day losses up to $4.54 billion.\nYear to date, AMC short sellers have now logged mark-to-market losses of $5.22 billion, Dusaniwsky said.\nAMC’s short interest now stands at about $2.91 billion, or about 18.2% of the stock’s float.\nEven after Wednesday’s big gain by AMC, GameStop short sellers have still taken the heavier blow so far in 2021. Dusaniwsky said GameStop short sellers lost $375.7 million on Wednesday, bringing their year-to-date losses up to $7.15 billion.\nGameStop now has $2.82 billion in short interest, or about 19.8% of the stock’s float.\nAs of Wednesday’s close, GameStop and AMC short sellers have endured combined losses of $12.3 billion in 2021, according to S3.\nBenzinga’s Take:AMC itself warned investors on Thursday that investing in its stock at current prices could result in them losing “all or a substantial portion” of their money.\nGiven the unprecedented trading action in both AMC and GameStop so far in 2021, it’s difficult to have too much sympathy for anyone who is short either stock at this point.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":205,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":107577146,"gmtCreate":1620526013585,"gmtModify":1704344589646,"author":{"id":"3549802203532457","authorId":"3549802203532457","name":"KasonT","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/00ff9ff5035d964b869c0d61a8e87f94","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3549802203532457","authorIdStr":"3549802203532457"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Interesting","listText":"Interesting","text":"Interesting","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/107577146","repostId":"1161532066","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1161532066","pubTimestamp":1620445785,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1161532066?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-05-08 11:49","market":"us","language":"en","title":"This Energy Company Is Gearing Up And Looks Ready For A Breakout","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1161532066","media":"Benzinga","summary":"CleanSpark Inc. shares gained more than 5% Friday after the company reported second-quarter EPS and ","content":"<p><b>CleanSpark Inc.</b>&nbsp;shares gained more than 5% Friday after the company reported second-quarter EPS&nbsp;and sales results that were up year-over-year.</p>\n<p>CleanSpark is an advanced software and controls technology solution company focused on solving modern energy challenges. The company posted earnings of&nbsp;28 cents per share and&nbsp;net income of $7.4 million.</p>\n<p>CleanSpark shares ended Friday's session 5.87% higher at $19.30.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d561d2702ac248172c83d9b566f67674\" tg-width=\"1542\" tg-height=\"821\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p><b>CleanSpark Daily Chart Analysis</b></p>\n<ul>\n <li>The stock has been falling throughout the last few months into what technical traders call a falling wedge pattern.</li>\n <li>The stock is trading below the 50-day moving average (green)&nbsp;and above the 200-day moving average (blue), indicating the stock is likely trading in a period of consolidation.</li>\n <li>The 50-day moving average may hold as a place of resistance and the 200-day moving average may be somewhere the stock finds support in the future.</li>\n</ul>\n<p><b>Key CleanSpark Levels To Watch</b></p>\n<ul>\n <li>The stock has been trading within the falling wedge pattern while also nearing a key level where it previously was unable to break.</li>\n <li>The falling wedge pattern is considered to be a bullish reversal pattern, and the stock could see an upwards move if it can cross above the resistance line that forms from connecting the highs.</li>\n <li>The chart history shows that the $15 level was a place that the stock struggled to cross for a period of time. Now that the stock is above this level, it may hold as support.</li>\n</ul>\n<p><b>What’s Next For CleanSpark?</b></p>\n<p>Bullish technical traders would like to see the stock bounce near the $15 level and start heading higher. A cross of the resistance line in the pattern hints to traders that the stock may be ready to break out and move higher.</p>\n<p>Bearish technical traders would like to see the stock fall down to the $15 level and break below. Consolidation below this level could be a tell that the stock is ready to move lower. If the price is unable to hold the 200-day moving average, sentiment may start turning bearish in the stock.</p>","source":"lsy1606299360108","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>This Energy Company Is Gearing Up And Looks Ready For A Breakout</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nThis Energy Company Is Gearing Up And Looks Ready For A Breakout\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-05-08 11:49 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.benzinga.com/news/earnings/21/05/21016881/this-energy-company-is-gearing-up-and-looks-ready-for-a-breakout><strong>Benzinga</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>CleanSpark Inc. shares gained more than 5% Friday after the company reported second-quarter EPS and sales results that were up year-over-year.\nCleanSpark is an advanced software and controls ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.benzinga.com/news/earnings/21/05/21016881/this-energy-company-is-gearing-up-and-looks-ready-for-a-breakout\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"CLSK":"CleanSpark, Inc."},"source_url":"https://www.benzinga.com/news/earnings/21/05/21016881/this-energy-company-is-gearing-up-and-looks-ready-for-a-breakout","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1161532066","content_text":"CleanSpark Inc. shares gained more than 5% Friday after the company reported second-quarter EPS and sales results that were up year-over-year.\nCleanSpark is an advanced software and controls technology solution company focused on solving modern energy challenges. The company posted earnings of 28 cents per share and net income of $7.4 million.\nCleanSpark shares ended Friday's session 5.87% higher at $19.30.\nCleanSpark Daily Chart Analysis\n\nThe stock has been falling throughout the last few months into what technical traders call a falling wedge pattern.\nThe stock is trading below the 50-day moving average (green) and above the 200-day moving average (blue), indicating the stock is likely trading in a period of consolidation.\nThe 50-day moving average may hold as a place of resistance and the 200-day moving average may be somewhere the stock finds support in the future.\n\nKey CleanSpark Levels To Watch\n\nThe stock has been trading within the falling wedge pattern while also nearing a key level where it previously was unable to break.\nThe falling wedge pattern is considered to be a bullish reversal pattern, and the stock could see an upwards move if it can cross above the resistance line that forms from connecting the highs.\nThe chart history shows that the $15 level was a place that the stock struggled to cross for a period of time. Now that the stock is above this level, it may hold as support.\n\nWhat’s Next For CleanSpark?\nBullish technical traders would like to see the stock bounce near the $15 level and start heading higher. A cross of the resistance line in the pattern hints to traders that the stock may be ready to break out and move higher.\nBearish technical traders would like to see the stock fall down to the $15 level and break below. Consolidation below this level could be a tell that the stock is ready to move lower. If the price is unable to hold the 200-day moving average, sentiment may start turning bearish in the stock.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":95,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":804094717,"gmtCreate":1627911369839,"gmtModify":1703497702603,"author":{"id":"3549802203532457","authorId":"3549802203532457","name":"KasonT","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/00ff9ff5035d964b869c0d61a8e87f94","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3549802203532457","authorIdStr":"3549802203532457"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/804094717","repostId":"1161935562","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":276,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":804095544,"gmtCreate":1627911346888,"gmtModify":1703497701231,"author":{"id":"3549802203532457","authorId":"3549802203532457","name":"KasonT","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/00ff9ff5035d964b869c0d61a8e87f94","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3549802203532457","authorIdStr":"3549802203532457"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"?&nbsp;","listText":"?&nbsp;","text":"?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/804095544","repostId":"1161935562","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":335,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":370690370,"gmtCreate":1618579162790,"gmtModify":1704712996820,"author":{"id":"3549802203532457","authorId":"3549802203532457","name":"KasonT","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/00ff9ff5035d964b869c0d61a8e87f94","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3549802203532457","authorIdStr":"3549802203532457"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hmmm","listText":"Hmmm","text":"Hmmm","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/370690370","repostId":"1184644880","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1184644880","pubTimestamp":1618576781,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1184644880?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-04-16 20:39","market":"us","language":"en","title":"What to watch today: Dow set to rise after closing above 34,000 for first time ever","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1184644880","media":"cnbc","summary":"BY THE NUMBERS\nDow futures rose modestlyFriday, a day after the30-stock averagegained nearly 1% andc","content":"<div>\n<p>BY THE NUMBERS\nDow futures rose modestlyFriday, a day after the30-stock averagegained nearly 1% andclosed above 34,000 for the first time ever. TheS&P 500increased 1.1% to another record close. ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/04/16/what-to-watch-dow-set-to-rise-after-closing-above-34000-for-first-time.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"cnbc_highlight","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>What to watch today: Dow set to rise after closing above 34,000 for first time ever</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhat to watch today: Dow set to rise after closing above 34,000 for first time ever\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-04-16 20:39 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.cnbc.com/2021/04/16/what-to-watch-dow-set-to-rise-after-closing-above-34000-for-first-time.html><strong>cnbc</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>BY THE NUMBERS\nDow futures rose modestlyFriday, a day after the30-stock averagegained nearly 1% andclosed above 34,000 for the first time ever. TheS&P 500increased 1.1% to another record close. ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/04/16/what-to-watch-dow-set-to-rise-after-closing-above-34000-for-first-time.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","SPY":"标普500ETF",".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/04/16/what-to-watch-dow-set-to-rise-after-closing-above-34000-for-first-time.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/72bb72e1b84c09fca865c6dcb1bbcd16","article_id":"1184644880","content_text":"BY THE NUMBERS\nDow futures rose modestlyFriday, a day after the30-stock averagegained nearly 1% andclosed above 34,000 for the first time ever. TheS&P 500increased 1.1% to another record close. TheNasdaqhad the best day, jumping 1.3% and finishing 0.4% away from its February closing record. Tech stocks rallied Thursday as the10-year Treasury yieldslippedbelow 1.6%. (CNBC)\n*'Roaring Kitty' stands to rake in millions on his GameStop options bet Friday(CNBC)\n*Dogecoin spikes 300% in a week, stoking fears of a cryptocurrency bubble(CNBC)\nMorgan Stanley(MS) this morning reportedbetter-than-expected earnings and revenuein the first quarter on strong bond trading results, following a week of stellar quarterly results to by financial firms. (CNBC)\n*PNC Financial dropped despite beat on earnings, revenue(Press Release)\n*Bank of New York Mellon shares rose after bank earnings, revenue beat(Press Release)\nBlowout March retail salesThursday helped lift stocks — and Friday, investors got a look at the red-hot residential real estate market. The Commerce Department saidMarch housing startssurged 19.4%, beating estimates. Building permits gained 2.7%, falling short of expectations. (CNBC)\n*'We need at least one more check' — the case for a fourth stimulus check(CNBC)\n*Cruise line CEOs press White House Covid team to resume sailings, sources say(CNBC)\n*American Eagle Outfitters CEO sees post-Covid 'Roaring 20s' for malls(CNBC)\nChina reported first-quarter gross domestic product a touch below expectations as industrial production disappointed but retail sales beat estimates.GDP soared 18.3%in Q1 from a year earlier. In the first quarter of 2020, the economy there shrank by 6.8% during the height of the domestic Covid outbreak. (CNBC)\nIN THE NEWS TODAY\nThe World Health Organization chief said Friday thatan alarming trendof rising Covid cases has resulted in infections around the world now approaching their highest level ever. In the U.S., cases per week are well off their all-time highs but consistent with levels seen during the summer surge. (CNBC)\nPfizer(PFE) CEO Albert Bourla said peoplewill likely needa booster dose of a Covid vaccine within 12 months of getting fully vaccinated. Bourla also said it’s possible that yearly vaccinations against the coronavirus will also be necessary. (CNBC)\n*Eli Lilly asks FDA to revoke authorization for Covid drug due to new variants (Reuters)\nAt least eight people diedafter a gunman opened fire at aFedExfacility in Indianapolis late Thursday and then killed himself, city police said. FedEx said in a statement: “We are deeply shocked and saddened by the loss of our team members. ... We are fully cooperating with investigating authorities.” (NBC News)\n*Video shows 13-year-old boy wasn’t holding gun when shot by Chicago police(AP)\n*Chauvin skips testifying as trial in George Floyd death nears end(AP)\n*Wright family demands more severe charges for Minnesota ex-officer(AP)\n*Critics condemn officer involved in Breonna Taylor raid writing a book(Louisville Courier Journal)\nPresident Joe Bidenis welcomingJapan’s prime minister to the White House on Friday in his first face-to-face meeting with a foreign leader, a choice that reflects Biden’s emphasis on strengthening alliances to deal with a more assertive China and other global challenges. (AP)\nThe National Football Leagueis officially openfor sports betting, announcing sportsbook partnerships with top companies Caesars (CZR), FanDuel, and DraftKings (DKNG). The agreements allow the sports betting firms to use NFL intellectual property and use its trademarks for betting promotions. (CNBC)\nHedge fund manager David Einhorn warned of dangers for retail investors that he sees in the stock market, and one of his main examples was a tiny New Jersey deli with a market cap of over $100 million. The Paulsboro, New Jersey-based store is the sole location for Hometown International(HWIN), with only $35,748 in sales in the last two years combined, according to securities filings.\n*NJ high school wrestling coach is CEO of $100 million firm that owns the deli(CNBC)\nShares of newly public cryptocurrency exchangeCoinbase (COIN) dipped in premarket trading on Friday. The weakness camedespite another vote of confidencefrom popular investor Cathie Wood, whose Ark Invest purchased about $110 million of the stock on Thursday. (Reuters)\nSTOCKS TO WATCH\nSunrun (RUN): Shares of the residential solar company jumped 3% after Simmons Energy upgraded the stock to an “overweight” rating. In a note to clients, the firm said the company has a strong growth story ahead, and that the recent weakness presents an attractive buying opportunity.\nCisco (CSCO): Cisco shares rose 1.1% in premarket trading Friday after Wolfe Research upgraded the equity to “outperform.” Analyst Jeff Kvaal wrote that “Strong  IT spending should prove a tailwind to Cisco  estimates” through fiscal year 2022 and said shares should climb to $63, representing a 22% upside from Thursday’s close.\nComcast (CMCSA): Shares of Comcast rose 1.2% before the opening bell after Raymond James upgraded the stock to an “outperform” rating and told clients it expects strong first-quarter earnings results from the media giant. “We believe there is future NBCU upside from HSD strength, Peacock sub growth, improved theatrical revenue, and phased theme park reopenings,” wrote analyst Frank Louthan.\nSimon Property Group (SPG): Shares of the real estate company rose in premarket trading after Jefferies upgraded the stock to “buy” from “hold.” The Wall Street firm said “retailer investments, pent-up consumer demand, and lower bad debt are positive catalysts” for the mall owner.\nUnited Airlines (UAL): Shares of the United Airlines popped in premarket trading following an upgrade to “buy” from “hold” from Argus. The Wall Street firm said it likes the airline’s plans to limit capacity, reduce structural costs by $2 billion, and restore margins to pre-pandemic levels.\nWATERCOOLER\nSo-called bucket list destinations come with big expectations — and often big crowds too. While overtourism can ruin many a holiday destination, it’s not the only reason vacations miss the mark. Here, travel writers who contribute to CNBC’s Global Travelershare the worst disappointmentsof their professional careers.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":255,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":802779656,"gmtCreate":1627814902875,"gmtModify":1703496219153,"author":{"id":"3549802203532457","authorId":"3549802203532457","name":"KasonT","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/00ff9ff5035d964b869c0d61a8e87f94","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3549802203532457","authorIdStr":"3549802203532457"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hmmm","listText":"Hmmm","text":"Hmmm","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/802779656","repostId":"1189883707","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":218,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":168115123,"gmtCreate":1623964830162,"gmtModify":1703824689705,"author":{"id":"3549802203532457","authorId":"3549802203532457","name":"KasonT","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/00ff9ff5035d964b869c0d61a8e87f94","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3549802203532457","authorIdStr":"3549802203532457"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Cool","listText":"Cool","text":"Cool","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/168115123","repostId":"2143979397","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":190,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":118515890,"gmtCreate":1622738273710,"gmtModify":1704190265103,"author":{"id":"3549802203532457","authorId":"3549802203532457","name":"KasonT","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/00ff9ff5035d964b869c0d61a8e87f94","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3549802203532457","authorIdStr":"3549802203532457"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Because they lose too much","listText":"Because they lose too much","text":"Because they lose too much","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/118515890","repostId":"1160289276","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":209,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":111131824,"gmtCreate":1622658918368,"gmtModify":1704188358604,"author":{"id":"3549802203532457","authorId":"3549802203532457","name":"KasonT","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/00ff9ff5035d964b869c0d61a8e87f94","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3549802203532457","authorIdStr":"3549802203532457"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hmm","listText":"Hmm","text":"Hmm","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/111131824","repostId":"2140448417","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2140448417","pubTimestamp":1622648316,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2140448417?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-02 23:38","market":"us","language":"en","title":"What You Should Know About Upstart Holdings' Valuation","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2140448417","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Investors are paying a big premium for this artificial intelligence-driven lending disruptor.","content":"<p>When it comes to lending money, the fundamentals haven't changed much over the years. Banks typically want to see a steady income, responsible spending habits, and an item of security -- like a house or a car -- before writing loans. Technology has improved the process significantly, and it continues to evolve to provide more information to lenders and more options for consumers.</p>\n<p><b>Upstart Holdings </b>(NASDAQ:UPST) is all-digital lending platform with an artificial intelligence model that measures alternative metrics when assessing a potential borrower. The company uses the technology to help originate loans for lenders, and its business model is already delivering profits. Its valuation, though, has ballooned as enthusiastic investors bet heavily on the stock -- and it could take <i>years </i>for profits to catch up. Is it still worth an investment today?</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/47a7615523095573d390a24d22976d99\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\"><span>Image Source: Getty Images.</span></p>\n<h2>How it works</h2>\n<p>Upstart partners with banks that write unsecured loans, to borrowers who might have a moderate to low income and might be used to paying higher interest rates. Some of its offerings include personal loans, wedding loans, credit card consolidation, and car loans. The annual percentage rate (interest) for an Upstart loan is in the 8.27% to 35.99% range, depending on the product.</p>\n<p>Total non-housing consumer debt in the U.S. stood at more than $4.1 trillion in Q1, including about $745 billion in ''revolving credit'' (credit cards and other loans consumers can pay down, reuse, and carry balances on). Upstart has a substantial market opportunity that it has only just begun to tap.</p>\n<p>Potential borrowers can submit a loan application through a bank that uses Upstart's application programming interface (API). Behind the scenes, the company's artificial intelligence is assessing the proposed loan, looking at more than 1,000 data points to provide a decision instantly (in most cases).</p>\n<p>Upstart's algorithm has the ability to assess a borrower based on nontraditional metrics. For example, it accounts for a borrower's education and where they went to school, in addition to their job history, rather than just on income and assets. The company claims its decision process can reduce default rates by 75%. In fact, it boasts 173% <i>more</i> approvals for the same overall loan loss rate.</p>\n<h2>Priced for perfection</h2>\n<p>Banks are usually valued methodically, using metrics like tangible book value and earnings per share. Investors have decades' worth of historical earnings and valuations to work with when assessing financial institutions. New technology makes the process a bit different -- investors don't have the same history to study, and disruptive companies can therefore be difficult to value.</p>\n<p>At the moment, Upstart is trading like a growth-oriented tech company, and this <i>could </i>be warranted since it's effectively a software business.</p>\n<table>\n <thead>\n  <tr>\n   <th><p>Year</p></th>\n   <th><p>Revenue</p></th>\n  </tr>\n </thead>\n <tbody>\n  <tr>\n   <td><p>2018</p></td>\n   <td><p>$99 million</p></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><p>2019</p></td>\n   <td><p>$164 million</p></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><p>2020</p></td>\n   <td><p>$233 million</p></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><p>Q1 2021</p></td>\n   <td><p>$121 million</p></td>\n  </tr>\n </tbody>\n</table>\n<p>Data source: Company filings.</p>\n<p>At Wednesday's prices, Upstart has a market cap over $11 billion, with full-year 2020 net income of $6 million. The company beat that total in this year's first quarter, with a net income of $10.1 million, so you can see how fast it's growing. However, it will likely need to earn significantly more for its current valuation to remain at these lofty levels.</p>\n<p>The company expects to earn $500 million in revenue in 2021 -- which would represent 114% in yearly revenue growth -- and based on the Q1 result, this could translate to over $40 million in net income.</p>\n<p>For the company to keep up this pace, it will most likely need new catalysts, and it likely has them.&nbsp;Upstart is now offering its platform technology to auto financiers, to capture a piece of the single largest lending segment after housing. Total auto loans in the U.S. grew to $1.37 trillion in 2020, and car shortages have led to higher prices and pent up demand across the board.</p>\n<p>The company has trailing 12-month revenue of $290 million, so the stock currently trades at a revenue multiple of roughly 38 times. That's higher than <b>Tesla</b>'s! With the growth opportunities Upstart is expecting, the company has the opportunity to grow its way into a less intimidating multiple over the next few years.&nbsp;But if you're buying it today, Upstart <i>must</i> deliver.</p>\n<h2>Looking forward</h2>\n<p>Upstart is showing promising growth in originations, with $1.73 billion in Q1, up 102% year over year on 169,750 total loans. This is <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE\">one</a> of the best metrics to measure the company's performance, as it translates directly to revenue. Since the company's algorithm instantly and automatically approved 71% of those loans, the scalability of this business is potentially enormous.</p>\n<p>If the company continues to deliver growth in net income, its stock will likely remain buoyant -- although the risk to the valuation <i>might </i>be to the downside, depending how fast that growth is. The question for investors is whether there is enough upside potential from here to warrant that risk. Upstart is guiding for a similar amount of net income in the second quarter as it delivered in Q1, putting the company on track to generate less than $50 million this year. That might not be enough to sustain its current market cap.</p>\n<p>However, for investors with a five-year time horizon (or more), Upstart could present a strong growth opportunity.</p>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>What You Should Know About Upstart Holdings' Valuation</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhat You Should Know About Upstart Holdings' Valuation\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-06-02 23:38 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/06/02/what-you-should-know-about-upstart-holdings-valuat/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>When it comes to lending money, the fundamentals haven't changed much over the years. Banks typically want to see a steady income, responsible spending habits, and an item of security -- like a house ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/06/02/what-you-should-know-about-upstart-holdings-valuat/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"UPST":"Upstart Holdings, Inc."},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/06/02/what-you-should-know-about-upstart-holdings-valuat/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2140448417","content_text":"When it comes to lending money, the fundamentals haven't changed much over the years. Banks typically want to see a steady income, responsible spending habits, and an item of security -- like a house or a car -- before writing loans. Technology has improved the process significantly, and it continues to evolve to provide more information to lenders and more options for consumers.\nUpstart Holdings (NASDAQ:UPST) is all-digital lending platform with an artificial intelligence model that measures alternative metrics when assessing a potential borrower. The company uses the technology to help originate loans for lenders, and its business model is already delivering profits. Its valuation, though, has ballooned as enthusiastic investors bet heavily on the stock -- and it could take years for profits to catch up. Is it still worth an investment today?\nImage Source: Getty Images.\nHow it works\nUpstart partners with banks that write unsecured loans, to borrowers who might have a moderate to low income and might be used to paying higher interest rates. Some of its offerings include personal loans, wedding loans, credit card consolidation, and car loans. The annual percentage rate (interest) for an Upstart loan is in the 8.27% to 35.99% range, depending on the product.\nTotal non-housing consumer debt in the U.S. stood at more than $4.1 trillion in Q1, including about $745 billion in ''revolving credit'' (credit cards and other loans consumers can pay down, reuse, and carry balances on). Upstart has a substantial market opportunity that it has only just begun to tap.\nPotential borrowers can submit a loan application through a bank that uses Upstart's application programming interface (API). Behind the scenes, the company's artificial intelligence is assessing the proposed loan, looking at more than 1,000 data points to provide a decision instantly (in most cases).\nUpstart's algorithm has the ability to assess a borrower based on nontraditional metrics. For example, it accounts for a borrower's education and where they went to school, in addition to their job history, rather than just on income and assets. The company claims its decision process can reduce default rates by 75%. In fact, it boasts 173% more approvals for the same overall loan loss rate.\nPriced for perfection\nBanks are usually valued methodically, using metrics like tangible book value and earnings per share. Investors have decades' worth of historical earnings and valuations to work with when assessing financial institutions. New technology makes the process a bit different -- investors don't have the same history to study, and disruptive companies can therefore be difficult to value.\nAt the moment, Upstart is trading like a growth-oriented tech company, and this could be warranted since it's effectively a software business.\n\n\n\nYear\nRevenue\n\n\n\n\n2018\n$99 million\n\n\n2019\n$164 million\n\n\n2020\n$233 million\n\n\nQ1 2021\n$121 million\n\n\n\nData source: Company filings.\nAt Wednesday's prices, Upstart has a market cap over $11 billion, with full-year 2020 net income of $6 million. The company beat that total in this year's first quarter, with a net income of $10.1 million, so you can see how fast it's growing. However, it will likely need to earn significantly more for its current valuation to remain at these lofty levels.\nThe company expects to earn $500 million in revenue in 2021 -- which would represent 114% in yearly revenue growth -- and based on the Q1 result, this could translate to over $40 million in net income.\nFor the company to keep up this pace, it will most likely need new catalysts, and it likely has them. Upstart is now offering its platform technology to auto financiers, to capture a piece of the single largest lending segment after housing. Total auto loans in the U.S. grew to $1.37 trillion in 2020, and car shortages have led to higher prices and pent up demand across the board.\nThe company has trailing 12-month revenue of $290 million, so the stock currently trades at a revenue multiple of roughly 38 times. That's higher than Tesla's! With the growth opportunities Upstart is expecting, the company has the opportunity to grow its way into a less intimidating multiple over the next few years. But if you're buying it today, Upstart must deliver.\nLooking forward\nUpstart is showing promising growth in originations, with $1.73 billion in Q1, up 102% year over year on 169,750 total loans. This is one of the best metrics to measure the company's performance, as it translates directly to revenue. Since the company's algorithm instantly and automatically approved 71% of those loans, the scalability of this business is potentially enormous.\nIf the company continues to deliver growth in net income, its stock will likely remain buoyant -- although the risk to the valuation might be to the downside, depending how fast that growth is. The question for investors is whether there is enough upside potential from here to warrant that risk. Upstart is guiding for a similar amount of net income in the second quarter as it delivered in Q1, putting the company on track to generate less than $50 million this year. That might not be enough to sustain its current market cap.\nHowever, for investors with a five-year time horizon (or more), Upstart could present a strong growth opportunity.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":75,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":191829429,"gmtCreate":1620870470561,"gmtModify":1704349575962,"author":{"id":"3549802203532457","authorId":"3549802203532457","name":"KasonT","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/00ff9ff5035d964b869c0d61a8e87f94","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3549802203532457","authorIdStr":"3549802203532457"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hmmm","listText":"Hmmm","text":"Hmmm","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/191829429","repostId":"2135643195","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2135643195","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1620863940,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2135643195?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-05-13 07:59","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Government reminds anxious gas customers: 'Do not fill plastic bags with gasoline'","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2135643195","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"'When people get desperate they stop thinking clearly,' the Consumer Product Safety Commission said ","content":"<p>'When people get desperate they stop thinking clearly,' the Consumer Product Safety Commission said following the Colonial pipeline ransomware attack.</p><p>A federal government agency tasked with consumer safety is urging a simple piece of advice: don't pump gas into plastic bags.</p><p>The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission tweeted that safety reminder Wednesday as the national average gasoline price increased to $3 per gallon and supplies shrank in the Southeast following a ransomware attack on a crucial pipeline that supplies 45% of all fuel to the East Coast.</p><p>\"We know this sounds simple, but when people get desperate they stop thinking clearly. They take risks that can have deadly consequences. If you know someone who is thinking about bringing a container not meant for fuel to get gas, please let them know it's dangerous,\" the agency said  , without referencing the cyberattack.</p><p>The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission wasn't aware of drivers stashing gas in bags during this week's shortage, said spokesman Joseph Martyak. But the tweets were meant dissuade anyone from even contemplating the idea, he said. Plastic bags aren't created to contain fuel and all it takes is <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE\">one</a> small leak or hole and then <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> ignition source to create a dangerous situation, Martyak noted.</p><p>People have done this in the past, Martyak noted. One image and one video of bagged-up gas that circulated on the internet Wednesday were real, but they pre-dated the cyber attack on the gas pipeline, according to the myth-busting website Snopes.com .</p><p>\"What happened then could happen now -- and we don't want that to happen,\" Martyak said.</p><p>The safety agency's tweet thread make another point too.</p><p>\"Sometimes when we put out a safety message like this people use it as a way to look down on others. We ask that instead you use this as an opportunity to reflect on safety in your own life,\" the safety commission said in a follow-up tweet.</p><p>Colonial Pipeline, the company behind the pipeline stretching from Texas to the New York Harbor, said that it had \"initiated the restart of pipeline operations\" at 5 p.m. Wednesday.</p><p>However, it will take several days for the product delivery supply chain to return to normal, according to the company's statement. \"Some markets served by Colonial Pipeline may experience, or continue to experience, intermittent service interruptions during the start-up period,\" the company added.</p><p>Though regions like the New York City area have ports and other pipelines to use, there are fewer alternatives in the South, experts say. It's been less than a week, but long lines have formed at gas stations in states such as North Carolina .</p><p>As a whole, the nation has adequate gas supplies, according to experts. They've urged drivers to resist the impulse to panic buy .</p><p>68% of North Carolina gas stations were out of gas and 45% of South Carolina stations are out of it as of Wednesday afternoon, according to Patrick De Haan,  head of petroleum analysis for GasBuddy, a website tracking gas prices and availability.</p><p>On Wednesday, the app overtook the Coinbase <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/COIN\">$(COIN)$</a> app as Apple's <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">$(AAPL)$</a> most downloaded app .</p><p>Wednesday also marked the day that national average gas prices reached $3.  prices reached that level, according to AAA.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Government reminds anxious gas customers: 'Do not fill plastic bags with gasoline'</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nGovernment reminds anxious gas customers: 'Do not fill plastic bags with gasoline'\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-05-13 07:59</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>'When people get desperate they stop thinking clearly,' the Consumer Product Safety Commission said following the Colonial pipeline ransomware attack.</p><p>A federal government agency tasked with consumer safety is urging a simple piece of advice: don't pump gas into plastic bags.</p><p>The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission tweeted that safety reminder Wednesday as the national average gasoline price increased to $3 per gallon and supplies shrank in the Southeast following a ransomware attack on a crucial pipeline that supplies 45% of all fuel to the East Coast.</p><p>\"We know this sounds simple, but when people get desperate they stop thinking clearly. They take risks that can have deadly consequences. If you know someone who is thinking about bringing a container not meant for fuel to get gas, please let them know it's dangerous,\" the agency said  , without referencing the cyberattack.</p><p>The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission wasn't aware of drivers stashing gas in bags during this week's shortage, said spokesman Joseph Martyak. But the tweets were meant dissuade anyone from even contemplating the idea, he said. Plastic bags aren't created to contain fuel and all it takes is <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE\">one</a> small leak or hole and then <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> ignition source to create a dangerous situation, Martyak noted.</p><p>People have done this in the past, Martyak noted. One image and one video of bagged-up gas that circulated on the internet Wednesday were real, but they pre-dated the cyber attack on the gas pipeline, according to the myth-busting website Snopes.com .</p><p>\"What happened then could happen now -- and we don't want that to happen,\" Martyak said.</p><p>The safety agency's tweet thread make another point too.</p><p>\"Sometimes when we put out a safety message like this people use it as a way to look down on others. We ask that instead you use this as an opportunity to reflect on safety in your own life,\" the safety commission said in a follow-up tweet.</p><p>Colonial Pipeline, the company behind the pipeline stretching from Texas to the New York Harbor, said that it had \"initiated the restart of pipeline operations\" at 5 p.m. Wednesday.</p><p>However, it will take several days for the product delivery supply chain to return to normal, according to the company's statement. \"Some markets served by Colonial Pipeline may experience, or continue to experience, intermittent service interruptions during the start-up period,\" the company added.</p><p>Though regions like the New York City area have ports and other pipelines to use, there are fewer alternatives in the South, experts say. It's been less than a week, but long lines have formed at gas stations in states such as North Carolina .</p><p>As a whole, the nation has adequate gas supplies, according to experts. They've urged drivers to resist the impulse to panic buy .</p><p>68% of North Carolina gas stations were out of gas and 45% of South Carolina stations are out of it as of Wednesday afternoon, according to Patrick De Haan,  head of petroleum analysis for GasBuddy, a website tracking gas prices and availability.</p><p>On Wednesday, the app overtook the Coinbase <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/COIN\">$(COIN)$</a> app as Apple's <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">$(AAPL)$</a> most downloaded app .</p><p>Wednesday also marked the day that national average gas prices reached $3.  prices reached that level, according to AAA.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2135643195","content_text":"'When people get desperate they stop thinking clearly,' the Consumer Product Safety Commission said following the Colonial pipeline ransomware attack.A federal government agency tasked with consumer safety is urging a simple piece of advice: don't pump gas into plastic bags.The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission tweeted that safety reminder Wednesday as the national average gasoline price increased to $3 per gallon and supplies shrank in the Southeast following a ransomware attack on a crucial pipeline that supplies 45% of all fuel to the East Coast.\"We know this sounds simple, but when people get desperate they stop thinking clearly. They take risks that can have deadly consequences. If you know someone who is thinking about bringing a container not meant for fuel to get gas, please let them know it's dangerous,\" the agency said  , without referencing the cyberattack.The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission wasn't aware of drivers stashing gas in bags during this week's shortage, said spokesman Joseph Martyak. But the tweets were meant dissuade anyone from even contemplating the idea, he said. Plastic bags aren't created to contain fuel and all it takes is one small leak or hole and then one ignition source to create a dangerous situation, Martyak noted.People have done this in the past, Martyak noted. One image and one video of bagged-up gas that circulated on the internet Wednesday were real, but they pre-dated the cyber attack on the gas pipeline, according to the myth-busting website Snopes.com .\"What happened then could happen now -- and we don't want that to happen,\" Martyak said.The safety agency's tweet thread make another point too.\"Sometimes when we put out a safety message like this people use it as a way to look down on others. We ask that instead you use this as an opportunity to reflect on safety in your own life,\" the safety commission said in a follow-up tweet.Colonial Pipeline, the company behind the pipeline stretching from Texas to the New York Harbor, said that it had \"initiated the restart of pipeline operations\" at 5 p.m. Wednesday.However, it will take several days for the product delivery supply chain to return to normal, according to the company's statement. \"Some markets served by Colonial Pipeline may experience, or continue to experience, intermittent service interruptions during the start-up period,\" the company added.Though regions like the New York City area have ports and other pipelines to use, there are fewer alternatives in the South, experts say. It's been less than a week, but long lines have formed at gas stations in states such as North Carolina .As a whole, the nation has adequate gas supplies, according to experts. They've urged drivers to resist the impulse to panic buy .68% of North Carolina gas stations were out of gas and 45% of South Carolina stations are out of it as of Wednesday afternoon, according to Patrick De Haan,  head of petroleum analysis for GasBuddy, a website tracking gas prices and availability.On Wednesday, the app overtook the Coinbase $(COIN)$ app as Apple's $(AAPL)$ most downloaded app .Wednesday also marked the day that national average gas prices reached $3.  prices reached that level, according to AAA.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":130,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":107574562,"gmtCreate":1620525984356,"gmtModify":1704344588998,"author":{"id":"3549802203532457","authorId":"3549802203532457","name":"KasonT","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/00ff9ff5035d964b869c0d61a8e87f94","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3549802203532457","authorIdStr":"3549802203532457"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"?","listText":"?","text":"?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/107574562","repostId":"1117194592","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1117194592","pubTimestamp":1620443747,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1117194592?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-05-08 11:15","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Forget Dogecoin -- This Stock Is a Better Buy","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1117194592","media":"fool","summary":"It's probably a safe bet to say that many of the buyers of Dogecoin did so because they are hoping t","content":"<p>It's probably a safe bet to say that many of the buyers of&nbsp;<b>Dogecoin</b>&nbsp;did so because they are hoping the meme cryptocurrency will go \"to the moon.\" But it'shard to make a real investment casefor something that jumps -- or drops -- 26% in value in the course of a day's trading just becauseElon MuskorMark Cubanmentions it in a tweet.</p><p>Investors looking for a moonshot investment would be better served to take a flier on a company in a sector that promises to create a fundamental shift in an existing industry. Electric vehicle (EV) sales are expected to jump from 1.7 million in 2020 to 8.5 million just by 2025, and to 26 million 10 years from now, according to industry research provider<i>BloombergNEF</i>. And the firm expects EV sales to more than double again in the following 10 years.</p><p>Charging station network leader&nbsp;<b>ChargePoint Holdings</b>(NYSE:CHPT)&nbsp;is established in the business, and investors in this company could ride the explosive EV growth trend.</p><p><b>De-SPAC results</b></p><p>ChargePoint went public on March 1 through a special purpose acquisition company (SPAC) merger. But unlike somede-SPAC companiesin the EV space, the company has so far met its sales expectations and kept its future outlook unchanged. That's because it was already an established business before going public, with more than 4,000 commercial and fleet customers, and more than 132,000 charging locations on its network in North America and Europe.</p><p>There is, and will be, plenty of competition in this space. But ChargePoint exists as one of the largest compared to other domestic and international players. Past and estimated future revenue of several in the sector are shown below.</p><table><tbody><tr><th>Company</th><th>2021 Revenue Estimate (million)</th><th>2020 Revenue (million)</th></tr><tr><td>ChargePoint</td><td>$200</td><td>$146</td></tr><tr><td>EVBox</td><td>$145</td><td>$84</td></tr><tr><td>Volta</td><td>$47</td><td>$25</td></tr><tr><td>EVgo</td><td>$20</td><td>$14</td></tr><tr><td>Blink Charging</td><td>NP*</td><td>$6.2</td></tr></tbody></table><p>DATA SOURCE: COMPANY FINANCIALS. *NOT PROVIDED</p><p><b>ChargePoint is the current favorite</b></p><p>ChargePoint already has a large lead in North America with a 70% share of Level 2 charging networks, which use 240-volt power. Its comprehensive network of offerings also includes more than 2,000 publicly available fast-charging stations. Its suite of products caters to the needs of EV fleet owners, parking operators, and consumers, as well as corporations and municipalities.</p><p>And in a sign of how large the market can grow, President Joe Biden has proposed installing 500,000 new charging stations in the U.S. as part of an infrastructure initiative. He also intends to electrify bus fleets and government vehicle fleets. While ChargePoint supports the infrastructure package, and would almost certainly be a beneficiary of its passage, the company doesn't need that catalyst for its charging network to grow rapidly.</p><p><b>Investors should play the odds and think long-term</b></p><p>Betting on the EV sector is not a short-term strategy. But if the exponential global growth to more than 54 million vehicles by 2040 materializes, today's high valuations in the sector could eventually be more than justified. Just looking at the two with the highest and lowest 2020 revenue, respectively, theprice-to-sales ratiosare about 50 for ChargePoint, but 250 for&nbsp;<b>Blink Charging</b>(NASDAQ:BLNK).</p><p>A bet on the charging network sector has no guarantee of success, of course. It's possible that automakers will try to have proprietary networks similar to&nbsp;<b>Tesla</b>'s(NASDAQ:TSLA)supercharger network model. But asautomakersramp up EV production, it would seem to make more sense for them to focus on what they know best, potentially including battery production.</p><p>For an investor wanting to speculate for big gains, charging companies have an established business in a quickly growing sector. Dogecoin keeps going up as Elon Musk or others excite retail trader interest. But if that's the only reason it's rising, it can't continue long term. A charging company like ChargePoint should have better odds at providing long-term gains.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Forget Dogecoin -- This Stock Is a Better Buy</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nForget Dogecoin -- This Stock Is a Better Buy\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-05-08 11:15 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/05/07/forget-dogecoin-this-stock-is-a-better-buy/><strong>fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>It's probably a safe bet to say that many of the buyers of Dogecoin did so because they are hoping the meme cryptocurrency will go \"to the moon.\" But it'shard to make a real investment casefor ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/05/07/forget-dogecoin-this-stock-is-a-better-buy/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"CHPT":"ChargePoint Holdings Inc."},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/05/07/forget-dogecoin-this-stock-is-a-better-buy/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1117194592","content_text":"It's probably a safe bet to say that many of the buyers of Dogecoin did so because they are hoping the meme cryptocurrency will go \"to the moon.\" But it'shard to make a real investment casefor something that jumps -- or drops -- 26% in value in the course of a day's trading just becauseElon MuskorMark Cubanmentions it in a tweet.Investors looking for a moonshot investment would be better served to take a flier on a company in a sector that promises to create a fundamental shift in an existing industry. Electric vehicle (EV) sales are expected to jump from 1.7 million in 2020 to 8.5 million just by 2025, and to 26 million 10 years from now, according to industry research providerBloombergNEF. And the firm expects EV sales to more than double again in the following 10 years.Charging station network leader ChargePoint Holdings(NYSE:CHPT) is established in the business, and investors in this company could ride the explosive EV growth trend.De-SPAC resultsChargePoint went public on March 1 through a special purpose acquisition company (SPAC) merger. But unlike somede-SPAC companiesin the EV space, the company has so far met its sales expectations and kept its future outlook unchanged. That's because it was already an established business before going public, with more than 4,000 commercial and fleet customers, and more than 132,000 charging locations on its network in North America and Europe.There is, and will be, plenty of competition in this space. But ChargePoint exists as one of the largest compared to other domestic and international players. Past and estimated future revenue of several in the sector are shown below.Company2021 Revenue Estimate (million)2020 Revenue (million)ChargePoint$200$146EVBox$145$84Volta$47$25EVgo$20$14Blink ChargingNP*$6.2DATA SOURCE: COMPANY FINANCIALS. *NOT PROVIDEDChargePoint is the current favoriteChargePoint already has a large lead in North America with a 70% share of Level 2 charging networks, which use 240-volt power. Its comprehensive network of offerings also includes more than 2,000 publicly available fast-charging stations. Its suite of products caters to the needs of EV fleet owners, parking operators, and consumers, as well as corporations and municipalities.And in a sign of how large the market can grow, President Joe Biden has proposed installing 500,000 new charging stations in the U.S. as part of an infrastructure initiative. He also intends to electrify bus fleets and government vehicle fleets. While ChargePoint supports the infrastructure package, and would almost certainly be a beneficiary of its passage, the company doesn't need that catalyst for its charging network to grow rapidly.Investors should play the odds and think long-termBetting on the EV sector is not a short-term strategy. But if the exponential global growth to more than 54 million vehicles by 2040 materializes, today's high valuations in the sector could eventually be more than justified. Just looking at the two with the highest and lowest 2020 revenue, respectively, theprice-to-sales ratiosare about 50 for ChargePoint, but 250 for Blink Charging(NASDAQ:BLNK).A bet on the charging network sector has no guarantee of success, of course. It's possible that automakers will try to have proprietary networks similar to Tesla's(NASDAQ:TSLA)supercharger network model. But asautomakersramp up EV production, it would seem to make more sense for them to focus on what they know best, potentially including battery production.For an investor wanting to speculate for big gains, charging companies have an established business in a quickly growing sector. Dogecoin keeps going up as Elon Musk or others excite retail trader interest. But if that's the only reason it's rising, it can't continue long term. A charging company like ChargePoint should have better odds at providing long-term gains.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":99,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":102582405,"gmtCreate":1620224258107,"gmtModify":1704340447904,"author":{"id":"3549802203532457","authorId":"3549802203532457","name":"KasonT","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/00ff9ff5035d964b869c0d61a8e87f94","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3549802203532457","authorIdStr":"3549802203532457"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hmm","listText":"Hmm","text":"Hmm","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/102582405","repostId":"2133523672","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2133523672","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1620219803,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2133523672?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-05-05 21:03","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Biden's Labor Department rescinds Trump-era rule affecting gig workers","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2133523672","media":"Reuters","summary":"WASHINGTON, May 5 (Reuters) - President Joe Biden's Labor Department on Wednesday rescinded a Trump-","content":"<p>WASHINGTON, May 5 (Reuters) - President Joe Biden's Labor Department on Wednesday rescinded a Trump-era rule that would have made it easier for businesses to classify workers as independent contractors instead of employees under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FLSA\">$(FLSA)$</a>.</p><p>\"By withdrawing the independent contractor rule, we will help preserve essential worker rights and stop the erosion of worker protections that would have occurred had the rule gone into effect,\" Labor Secretary Marty Walsh said in a statement.</p><p>\"Too often, workers lose important wage and related protections when employers misclassify them as independent contractors,\" he said.</p><p>Walsh told Reuters in an interview last week that a lot of U.S. gig workers should be classified as \"employees\" who deserve work benefits. His comments signaled a shift in policy and hurt stocks of companies such as Uber Technologies Inc    and Lyft Inc    that employ gig labor.</p><p>Gig workers are independent contractors who perform on-demand services, including as drivers, delivering groceries or providing childcare - and are <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE\">one</a>-third more likely to be Black or Latino, according to an Edison Research poll.</p><p>Walsh said in the interview that his department would have conversations in coming months with companies that employ gig labor to make sure workers have access to consistent wages, sick time, healthcare and \"all of the things that an average employee in America can access.\"</p><p>The rule by President Donald Trump's administration,  finalized in early January before he left office on Jan. 20, would have hampered workers' ability to earn a minimum wage and overtime compensation - protections offered under the FLSA.</p><p>It was supposed to take effect in March, but did not because it was being reviewed by Biden's Labor Department. The withdrawal will be effective on Thursday.</p><p>An Uber spokesman said last week that an overwhelming majority of app-based workers want to stay independent, because it allows them to work when, where and how they want with flexibility no traditional job can match.</p><p>The FLSA includes provisions that require covered employers to pay employees at least the federal minimum wage for every hour they work and overtime compensation at not less than 1-1/2 times their regular rate of pay for every hour they work over 40 in a workweek. FLSA protections do not apply to independent contractors.</p><p>\"The independent contractor rule was in tension with the FLSA's text and purpose,\" the Labor Department said.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Biden's Labor Department rescinds Trump-era rule affecting gig workers</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBiden's Labor Department rescinds Trump-era rule affecting gig workers\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-05-05 21:03</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>WASHINGTON, May 5 (Reuters) - President Joe Biden's Labor Department on Wednesday rescinded a Trump-era rule that would have made it easier for businesses to classify workers as independent contractors instead of employees under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FLSA\">$(FLSA)$</a>.</p><p>\"By withdrawing the independent contractor rule, we will help preserve essential worker rights and stop the erosion of worker protections that would have occurred had the rule gone into effect,\" Labor Secretary Marty Walsh said in a statement.</p><p>\"Too often, workers lose important wage and related protections when employers misclassify them as independent contractors,\" he said.</p><p>Walsh told Reuters in an interview last week that a lot of U.S. gig workers should be classified as \"employees\" who deserve work benefits. His comments signaled a shift in policy and hurt stocks of companies such as Uber Technologies Inc    and Lyft Inc    that employ gig labor.</p><p>Gig workers are independent contractors who perform on-demand services, including as drivers, delivering groceries or providing childcare - and are <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE\">one</a>-third more likely to be Black or Latino, according to an Edison Research poll.</p><p>Walsh said in the interview that his department would have conversations in coming months with companies that employ gig labor to make sure workers have access to consistent wages, sick time, healthcare and \"all of the things that an average employee in America can access.\"</p><p>The rule by President Donald Trump's administration,  finalized in early January before he left office on Jan. 20, would have hampered workers' ability to earn a minimum wage and overtime compensation - protections offered under the FLSA.</p><p>It was supposed to take effect in March, but did not because it was being reviewed by Biden's Labor Department. The withdrawal will be effective on Thursday.</p><p>An Uber spokesman said last week that an overwhelming majority of app-based workers want to stay independent, because it allows them to work when, where and how they want with flexibility no traditional job can match.</p><p>The FLSA includes provisions that require covered employers to pay employees at least the federal minimum wage for every hour they work and overtime compensation at not less than 1-1/2 times their regular rate of pay for every hour they work over 40 in a workweek. FLSA protections do not apply to independent contractors.</p><p>\"The independent contractor rule was in tension with the FLSA's text and purpose,\" the Labor Department said.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"UBER":"优步","LYFT":"Lyft, Inc."},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2133523672","content_text":"WASHINGTON, May 5 (Reuters) - President Joe Biden's Labor Department on Wednesday rescinded a Trump-era rule that would have made it easier for businesses to classify workers as independent contractors instead of employees under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act $(FLSA)$.\"By withdrawing the independent contractor rule, we will help preserve essential worker rights and stop the erosion of worker protections that would have occurred had the rule gone into effect,\" Labor Secretary Marty Walsh said in a statement.\"Too often, workers lose important wage and related protections when employers misclassify them as independent contractors,\" he said.Walsh told Reuters in an interview last week that a lot of U.S. gig workers should be classified as \"employees\" who deserve work benefits. His comments signaled a shift in policy and hurt stocks of companies such as Uber Technologies Inc    and Lyft Inc    that employ gig labor.Gig workers are independent contractors who perform on-demand services, including as drivers, delivering groceries or providing childcare - and are one-third more likely to be Black or Latino, according to an Edison Research poll.Walsh said in the interview that his department would have conversations in coming months with companies that employ gig labor to make sure workers have access to consistent wages, sick time, healthcare and \"all of the things that an average employee in America can access.\"The rule by President Donald Trump's administration,  finalized in early January before he left office on Jan. 20, would have hampered workers' ability to earn a minimum wage and overtime compensation - protections offered under the FLSA.It was supposed to take effect in March, but did not because it was being reviewed by Biden's Labor Department. The withdrawal will be effective on Thursday.An Uber spokesman said last week that an overwhelming majority of app-based workers want to stay independent, because it allows them to work when, where and how they want with flexibility no traditional job can match.The FLSA includes provisions that require covered employers to pay employees at least the federal minimum wage for every hour they work and overtime compensation at not less than 1-1/2 times their regular rate of pay for every hour they work over 40 in a workweek. FLSA protections do not apply to independent contractors.\"The independent contractor rule was in tension with the FLSA's text and purpose,\" the Labor Department said.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":136,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}