Expert126 personal page - To The Moon

Expert126

Expert126

No personal profile

39Follow

29Followers

4Topic

0Badge

2023-06-16

How can inpostnsnssjsjsjs

2022-10-25

Ok

@Jo Tan:$DBS GROUP HOLDINGS LTD(D05.SI)$interesting day today as we await to see if DBS will do well or not. Why? Reasons for rise: 1. Possible stability in the U.K. with new leadership. This will help stable the pound. 2. Bank benefits as banks have been doing better with the interest rates being better. Reasons for fall: 1. Ongoing inflation, although I am hoping this has been quelled somewhat. 2. Volatility globally as the dust has not settled. 3. Prices continue upwards with consumers spending being smaller. With all this in consideration, today will be difficult to tell, even as the S&P500 went green yesterday. But it is in my opinion that $DBS GROUP HOLDINGS LTD(D05.SI)$is more stable whi

2022-10-23

Ok

Elon Musk May Need to Sell $10B Worth of Tesla Stock to Finance Twitter Takeover - Wedbush

2022-10-14

Kelong

US STOCKS-Wall Street Ends up 2% After Sharp Reversal; Technicals Help

2022-10-13

Ikok

September CPI Rises More Than Expected; Core CPI Rises to 40-Year High

2022-10-12

Okok

Coal Miner Coronado Global Confirms Merger Talks With Peabody Energy

2022-10-09

Okok

Twitter-Elon Musk Deal Has Offered Investors Several Big Opportunities

2022-10-08

Okok

SGX Weekly Review: SATS, Singapore Bank Home Loan Rates and Singapore Retail Sales

2022-10-07

Okok

Is Now the Right Time to Buy Netflix Stock?

2022-10-06

Whay

Down 30% to 50%, These Stocks Are Essential Bear Market Buys

2022-10-05

Okok

Meme Stocks Rallied in Morning Trading, With Biocryst Pharmaceuticals Jumping Over 10% and Express Jumping Over 8%

2022-10-04

Okok

3 Stocks to Avoid This Week

2022-10-03

Ok

Apple Stock Had an Awful September, But the Quarter Wasn't Half-Bad

2022-10-01

Okok

2 REITs with the World’s Most Reliable Tenant

2022-09-30

Maf

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2022-09-29

Okok

US STOCKS-Wall Street Ends Sharply Higher as Treasury Yields Dip

2022-09-28

Okoo

Oil Stocks Gained in Morning Trading

2022-09-28

Ok

2 Top Index Funds That Could Make Retirees Richer Over the Next Decade

2022-09-27

Okok

US STOCKS-Wall Street Ends Lower, Dow Confirms Bear Market

2022-09-24

Okok

Why Are Oil Stocks XOM, OXY, DVN Down Friday?

Go to Tiger App to see more news

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"userPageInfo":{"id":"3554886109685293","uuid":"3554886109685293","gmtCreate":1591793194165,"gmtModify":1619402278942,"name":"Expert126","pinyin":"expert126","introduction":"","introductionEn":null,"signature":"","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2d4304f2ec7fabd9d599a3ba8b2a17e0","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":29,"headSize":39,"tweetSize":338,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":1,"name":"萌萌虎","nameTw":"萌萌虎","represent":"呱呱坠地","factor":"评论帖子3次或发布1条主帖（非转发）","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":4,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":"success","userBadges":[{"badgeId":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493-3","templateUuid":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493","name":" Tiger Idol","description":"Join the tiger community for 1500 days","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8b40ae7da5bf081a1c84df14bf9e6367","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f160eceddd7c284a8e1136557615cfad","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/11792805c468334a9b31c39f95a41c6a","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2024.07.20","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789-1","templateUuid":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789","name":"Knowledgeable Investor","description":"Traded more than 10 stocks","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e74cc24115c4fbae6154ec1b1041bf47","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d48265cbfd97c57f9048db29f22227b0","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76c6d6898b073c77e1c537ebe9ac1c57","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2022.04.06","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1102},{"badgeId":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be-1","templateUuid":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be","name":"Elite Trader","description":"Total number of securities or futures transactions reached 30","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ab0f87127c854ce3191a752d57b46edc","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c9835ce48b8c8743566d344ac7a7ba8c","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76754b53ce7a90019f132c1d2fbc698f","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2022.01.30","exceedPercentage":"60.56%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100},{"badgeId":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84-1","templateUuid":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84","name":"Real Trader","description":"Completed a transaction","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":4,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":null,"starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":1,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"post","tweets":[{"id":188002049999112,"gmtCreate":1686924670906,"gmtModify":1686924674853,"author":{"id":"3554886109685293","authorId":"3554886109685293","name":"Expert126","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2d4304f2ec7fabd9d599a3ba8b2a17e0","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3554886109685293","idStr":"3554886109685293"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"How can inpostnsnssjsjsjs","listText":"How can inpostnsnssjsjsjs","text":"How can inpostnsnssjsjsjs","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/188002049999112","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":355,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9988074276,"gmtCreate":1666649875896,"gmtModify":1676537781926,"author":{"id":"3554886109685293","authorId":"3554886109685293","name":"Expert126","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2d4304f2ec7fabd9d599a3ba8b2a17e0","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3554886109685293","idStr":"3554886109685293"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9988074276","repostId":"9988070689","repostType":1,"repost":{"id":9988070689,"gmtCreate":1666648112241,"gmtModify":1676537781655,"author":{"id":"4103923793959030","authorId":"4103923793959030","name":"Jo Tan","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/25f349ba1560882a8ae004ed0b7060bf","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4103923793959030","idStr":"4103923793959030"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/D05.SI\">$DBS GROUP HOLDINGS LTD(D05.SI)$</a>interesting day today as we await to see if DBS will do well or not. Why?&nbsp; Reasons for rise: 1. Possible stability in the U.K. with new leadership. This will help stable the pound. 2. Bank benefits as banks have been doing better with the interest rates being better. Reasons for fall: 1. Ongoing inflation, although I am hoping this has been quelled somewhat. 2. Volatility globally as the dust has not settled. 3. Prices continue upwards with consumers spending being smaller. With all this in consideration, today will be difficult to tell, even as the S&amp;P500 went green yesterday. But it is in my opinion that&nbsp;<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/D05.SI\">$DBS GROUP HOLDINGS LTD(D05.SI)$</a>is more stable whi","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/D05.SI\">$DBS GROUP HOLDINGS LTD(D05.SI)$</a>interesting day today as we await to see if DBS will do well or not. Why?&nbsp; Reasons for rise: 1. Possible stability in the U.K. with new leadership. This will help stable the pound. 2. Bank benefits as banks have been doing better with the interest rates being better. Reasons for fall: 1. Ongoing inflation, although I am hoping this has been quelled somewhat. 2. Volatility globally as the dust has not settled. 3. Prices continue upwards with consumers spending being smaller. With all this in consideration, today will be difficult to tell, even as the S&amp;P500 went green yesterday. But it is in my opinion that&nbsp;<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/D05.SI\">$DBS GROUP HOLDINGS LTD(D05.SI)$</a>is more stable whi","text":"$DBS GROUP HOLDINGS LTD(D05.SI)$interesting day today as we await to see if DBS will do well or not. Why? Reasons for rise: 1. Possible stability in the U.K. with new leadership. This will help stable the pound. 2. Bank benefits as banks have been doing better with the interest rates being better. Reasons for fall: 1. Ongoing inflation, although I am hoping this has been quelled somewhat. 2. Volatility globally as the dust has not settled. 3. Prices continue upwards with consumers spending being smaller. With all this in consideration, today will be difficult to tell, even as the S&P500 went green yesterday. But it is in my opinion that $DBS GROUP HOLDINGS LTD(D05.SI)$is more stable whi","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/fd2bc8a180f3ad275365d1243967545c","width":"1080","height":"2109"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":2,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9988070689","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":0,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":421,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9981688775,"gmtCreate":1666491737697,"gmtModify":1676537761587,"author":{"id":"3554886109685293","authorId":"3554886109685293","name":"Expert126","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2d4304f2ec7fabd9d599a3ba8b2a17e0","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3554886109685293","idStr":"3554886109685293"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9981688775","repostId":"2277404196","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2277404196","pubTimestamp":1666482464,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2277404196?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-10-23 07:47","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Elon Musk May Need to Sell $10B Worth of Tesla Stock to Finance Twitter Takeover - Wedbush","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2277404196","media":"seekingalpha","summary":"The headache for $Tesla(TSLA)$ shareholders stemming from Elon Musk’s bid for $Twitter(TWTR)$ is far from over, according to Wedbush analyst Dan Ives.Ives said that the $44B price tag for the social m","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>The headache for <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">Tesla</a> shareholders stemming from Elon Musk’s bid for <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TWTR\">Twitter</a> is far from over, according to Wedbush analyst Dan Ives.</p><p>Ives said that the $44B price tag for the social media player is “simply a train wreck” and about $14B above what he sees as fair value. Indeed, Musk himself said during the automaker’s earnings call on Wednesday that he, and other investors, “are obviously overpaying for Twitter.”</p><p>While Musk has already sold billions worth of <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">Tesla</a> stock to help fund the deal, the shaky outside financing of the blockbuster deal should have investors in the EV leader apprehensive, according to Ives. In his view, Musk could be forced to make billions more in sales before he can declare “funding secured.”</p><p>“It&#39;s pretty simple, the more investors that bail on this deal, the more money that Musk needs to contribute and therefore sell more Tesla stock,” Ives told clients on Friday. “This continues to be a brutal situation for Tesla investors to bear the burden as we believe Musk might need to sell an additional $5B to $10B range to fund this deal depending on the financing talks this week/weekend.”</p><p>The Delaware Chancery Court recently set October 28 as the hard deadline for the deal to close.</p></body></html>","source":"seekingalpha","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Elon Musk May Need to Sell $10B Worth of Tesla Stock to Finance Twitter Takeover - Wedbush</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nElon Musk May Need to Sell $10B Worth of Tesla Stock to Finance Twitter Takeover - Wedbush\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-10-23 07:47 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/news/3893707-elon-musk-may-need-to-sell-10b-worth-of-tesla-stock-to-finance-twitter-takeover-wedbush><strong>seekingalpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The headache for Tesla shareholders stemming from Elon Musk’s bid for Twitter is far from over, according to Wedbush analyst Dan Ives.Ives said that the $44B price tag for the social media player is “...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/news/3893707-elon-musk-may-need-to-sell-10b-worth-of-tesla-stock-to-finance-twitter-takeover-wedbush\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TWTR":"Twitter","TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/news/3893707-elon-musk-may-need-to-sell-10b-worth-of-tesla-stock-to-finance-twitter-takeover-wedbush","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5a36db9d73b4222bc376d24ccc48c8a4","article_id":"2277404196","content_text":"The headache for Tesla shareholders stemming from Elon Musk’s bid for Twitter is far from over, according to Wedbush analyst Dan Ives.Ives said that the $44B price tag for the social media player is “simply a train wreck” and about $14B above what he sees as fair value. Indeed, Musk himself said during the automaker’s earnings call on Wednesday that he, and other investors, “are obviously overpaying for Twitter.”While Musk has already sold billions worth of Tesla stock to help fund the deal, the shaky outside financing of the blockbuster deal should have investors in the EV leader apprehensive, according to Ives. In his view, Musk could be forced to make billions more in sales before he can declare “funding secured.”“It's pretty simple, the more investors that bail on this deal, the more money that Musk needs to contribute and therefore sell more Tesla stock,” Ives told clients on Friday. “This continues to be a brutal situation for Tesla investors to bear the burden as we believe Musk might need to sell an additional $5B to $10B range to fund this deal depending on the financing talks this week/weekend.”The Delaware Chancery Court recently set October 28 as the hard deadline for the deal to close.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":445,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9980616045,"gmtCreate":1665713881887,"gmtModify":1676537653862,"author":{"id":"3554886109685293","authorId":"3554886109685293","name":"Expert126","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2d4304f2ec7fabd9d599a3ba8b2a17e0","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3554886109685293","idStr":"3554886109685293"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Kelong","listText":"Kelong","text":"Kelong","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9980616045","repostId":"2275728816","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2275728816","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1665700683,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2275728816?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-10-14 06:38","market":"us","language":"en","title":"US STOCKS-Wall Street Ends up 2% After Sharp Reversal; Technicals Help","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2275728816","media":"Reuters","summary":"* Stocks reverse course after morning drop* Headline CPI rise for September more than expected* Inde","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>* Stocks reverse course after morning drop</p><p>* Headline CPI rise for September more than expected</p><p>* Indexes: Dow up 2.8%, S&amp;P 500 up 2.6%, Nasdaq up 2.2%</p><p>NEW YORK, Oct 13 (Reuters) - U.S. stocks surged to close more than 2% higher on Thursday, as technical support and investors covering short bets drove a dramatic rebound from a selloff earlier in the day.</p><p>The reversal marked a jump of nearly 194 points in the S&amp;P 500 from its low of the session to its high, the biggest intraday jump for the index since Jan. 24.</p><p>Financials and energy led gains among S&amp;P 500 sectors.</p><p>The market initially dropped after data showed the headline consumer price index rose at an annual pace of 8.2% in September, compared with an estimated 8.1% rise.</p><p>&#34;People were perhaps net short going into the CPI report, and saw the report being negative and started covering their shorts,&#34; said King Lip, chief investment strategist at Baker Avenue Asset Management in San Francisco.</p><p>Some strategists also pointed to some technical support levels around the 3,500 mark for the S&amp;P 500.</p><p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 827.87 points, or 2.83%, to 30,038.72, the S&amp;P 500 gained 92.88 points, or 2.60%, to 3,669.91 and the Nasdaq Composite added 232.05 points, or 2.23%, to 10,649.15.</p><p>&#34;It&#39;s technical factors,&#34; Lip said, adding that the recent steep selloff in stocks may mean &#34;bad news may have already been discounted.</p><p>&#34;Going into earnings season, all we really need is things to be not as bad as suspected,&#34; he said.</p><p>Big Wall Street banks kick off third-quarter reporting season on Friday, with investors awaiting to see how a high interest-rate environment affects their profits.</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/WBA\">Walgreens Boots Alliance</a> Inc rose following better-than-estimated fourth-quarter results.</p><p>Advancing issues outnumbered declining ones on the NYSE by a 2.24-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 2.10-to-1 ratio favored advancers.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 posted three new 52-week highs and 172 new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 51 new highs and 600 new lows.</p><p>Volume on U.S. exchanges was 13.39 billion shares, compared with a roughly 11 billion average for the full session over the last 20 trading days.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/57e6e2f817e41145b8c6aff3ef3e656b\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"1920\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>US STOCKS-Wall Street Ends up 2% After Sharp Reversal; Technicals Help</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nUS STOCKS-Wall Street Ends up 2% After Sharp Reversal; Technicals Help\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-10-14 06:38</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>* Stocks reverse course after morning drop</p><p>* Headline CPI rise for September more than expected</p><p>* Indexes: Dow up 2.8%, S&amp;P 500 up 2.6%, Nasdaq up 2.2%</p><p>NEW YORK, Oct 13 (Reuters) - U.S. stocks surged to close more than 2% higher on Thursday, as technical support and investors covering short bets drove a dramatic rebound from a selloff earlier in the day.</p><p>The reversal marked a jump of nearly 194 points in the S&amp;P 500 from its low of the session to its high, the biggest intraday jump for the index since Jan. 24.</p><p>Financials and energy led gains among S&amp;P 500 sectors.</p><p>The market initially dropped after data showed the headline consumer price index rose at an annual pace of 8.2% in September, compared with an estimated 8.1% rise.</p><p>&#34;People were perhaps net short going into the CPI report, and saw the report being negative and started covering their shorts,&#34; said King Lip, chief investment strategist at Baker Avenue Asset Management in San Francisco.</p><p>Some strategists also pointed to some technical support levels around the 3,500 mark for the S&amp;P 500.</p><p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 827.87 points, or 2.83%, to 30,038.72, the S&amp;P 500 gained 92.88 points, or 2.60%, to 3,669.91 and the Nasdaq Composite added 232.05 points, or 2.23%, to 10,649.15.</p><p>&#34;It&#39;s technical factors,&#34; Lip said, adding that the recent steep selloff in stocks may mean &#34;bad news may have already been discounted.</p><p>&#34;Going into earnings season, all we really need is things to be not as bad as suspected,&#34; he said.</p><p>Big Wall Street banks kick off third-quarter reporting season on Friday, with investors awaiting to see how a high interest-rate environment affects their profits.</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/WBA\">Walgreens Boots Alliance</a> Inc rose following better-than-estimated fourth-quarter results.</p><p>Advancing issues outnumbered declining ones on the NYSE by a 2.24-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 2.10-to-1 ratio favored advancers.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 posted three new 52-week highs and 172 new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 51 new highs and 600 new lows.</p><p>Volume on U.S. exchanges was 13.39 billion shares, compared with a roughly 11 billion average for the full session over the last 20 trading days.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/57e6e2f817e41145b8c6aff3ef3e656b\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"1920\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2275728816","content_text":"* Stocks reverse course after morning drop* Headline CPI rise for September more than expected* Indexes: Dow up 2.8%, S&P 500 up 2.6%, Nasdaq up 2.2%NEW YORK, Oct 13 (Reuters) - U.S. stocks surged to close more than 2% higher on Thursday, as technical support and investors covering short bets drove a dramatic rebound from a selloff earlier in the day.The reversal marked a jump of nearly 194 points in the S&P 500 from its low of the session to its high, the biggest intraday jump for the index since Jan. 24.Financials and energy led gains among S&P 500 sectors.The market initially dropped after data showed the headline consumer price index rose at an annual pace of 8.2% in September, compared with an estimated 8.1% rise.\"People were perhaps net short going into the CPI report, and saw the report being negative and started covering their shorts,\" said King Lip, chief investment strategist at Baker Avenue Asset Management in San Francisco.Some strategists also pointed to some technical support levels around the 3,500 mark for the S&P 500.The Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 827.87 points, or 2.83%, to 30,038.72, the S&P 500 gained 92.88 points, or 2.60%, to 3,669.91 and the Nasdaq Composite added 232.05 points, or 2.23%, to 10,649.15.\"It's technical factors,\" Lip said, adding that the recent steep selloff in stocks may mean \"bad news may have already been discounted.\"Going into earnings season, all we really need is things to be not as bad as suspected,\" he said.Big Wall Street banks kick off third-quarter reporting season on Friday, with investors awaiting to see how a high interest-rate environment affects their profits.Walgreens Boots Alliance Inc rose following better-than-estimated fourth-quarter results.Advancing issues outnumbered declining ones on the NYSE by a 2.24-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 2.10-to-1 ratio favored advancers.The S&P 500 posted three new 52-week highs and 172 new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 51 new highs and 600 new lows.Volume on U.S. exchanges was 13.39 billion shares, compared with a roughly 11 billion average for the full session over the last 20 trading days.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":491,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9980101297,"gmtCreate":1665667843019,"gmtModify":1676537645761,"author":{"id":"3554886109685293","authorId":"3554886109685293","name":"Expert126","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2d4304f2ec7fabd9d599a3ba8b2a17e0","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3554886109685293","idStr":"3554886109685293"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ikok","listText":"Ikok","text":"Ikok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":11,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9980101297","repostId":"1174256425","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1174256425","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1665674838,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1174256425?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-10-13 23:27","market":"us","language":"en","title":"September CPI Rises More Than Expected; Core CPI Rises to 40-Year High","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1174256425","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Core consumer price index jumps to 40-year highThe numbers: The cost of living rose 0.4% in Septembe","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Core consumer price index jumps to 40-year high</p><p>The numbers: The cost of living rose 0.4% in September and pointed to high inflation persisting through the end of the year, reinforcing the view the Federal Reserve will keep raising interest rates aggressively to try to curb rampant price increases.</p><p>Economists polled by The Wall Street Journal had forecast a 0.3% increase.</p><p>The yearly rate of inflation slipped to 8.2 from 8.3%. Inflation peaked at a nearly 41-year high of 9.1% in June.</p><p>In another worrisome sign, the so-called core rate of inflation that omits food and energy prices jumped a sharp 0.6%. Wall Street had forecast a 0.4% gain.</p><p>The increase in the core rate over the past year climbed to a new peak of 6.6% from 6.3%, marking the biggest gain in 40 years.</p><p>The Fed views the core rate as a more accurate measure of future inflation trends.</p><p>The cost of staples such as food, rent, medical care and new cars all rose last month.</p><p>Inflation rose an average of less than 2% a year in the decade preceding the pandemic.</p><p>Still, the higher cost of borrowing is expected to weaken the economy over the next year and pull inflation lower. Prices tend to fall when consumers spend less and demand for goods and services dry up.</p><p>The Fed may have to raise rates so high to beat back inflation, however, that it could tip the economy into recession. The annual rate of inflation is more than quadruple the pre-pandemic levels of less than 2%.</p><p>Top officials signaled they will do what it takes to beat down inflation -- even at the cost of recession -- at the Fed&#39;s last big meeting in September.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>September CPI Rises More Than Expected; Core CPI Rises to 40-Year High</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSeptember CPI Rises More Than Expected; Core CPI Rises to 40-Year High\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-10-13 23:27</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>Core consumer price index jumps to 40-year high</p><p>The numbers: The cost of living rose 0.4% in September and pointed to high inflation persisting through the end of the year, reinforcing the view the Federal Reserve will keep raising interest rates aggressively to try to curb rampant price increases.</p><p>Economists polled by The Wall Street Journal had forecast a 0.3% increase.</p><p>The yearly rate of inflation slipped to 8.2 from 8.3%. Inflation peaked at a nearly 41-year high of 9.1% in June.</p><p>In another worrisome sign, the so-called core rate of inflation that omits food and energy prices jumped a sharp 0.6%. Wall Street had forecast a 0.4% gain.</p><p>The increase in the core rate over the past year climbed to a new peak of 6.6% from 6.3%, marking the biggest gain in 40 years.</p><p>The Fed views the core rate as a more accurate measure of future inflation trends.</p><p>The cost of staples such as food, rent, medical care and new cars all rose last month.</p><p>Inflation rose an average of less than 2% a year in the decade preceding the pandemic.</p><p>Still, the higher cost of borrowing is expected to weaken the economy over the next year and pull inflation lower. Prices tend to fall when consumers spend less and demand for goods and services dry up.</p><p>The Fed may have to raise rates so high to beat back inflation, however, that it could tip the economy into recession. The annual rate of inflation is more than quadruple the pre-pandemic levels of less than 2%.</p><p>Top officials signaled they will do what it takes to beat down inflation -- even at the cost of recession -- at the Fed&#39;s last big meeting in September.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1174256425","content_text":"Core consumer price index jumps to 40-year highThe numbers: The cost of living rose 0.4% in September and pointed to high inflation persisting through the end of the year, reinforcing the view the Federal Reserve will keep raising interest rates aggressively to try to curb rampant price increases.Economists polled by The Wall Street Journal had forecast a 0.3% increase.The yearly rate of inflation slipped to 8.2 from 8.3%. Inflation peaked at a nearly 41-year high of 9.1% in June.In another worrisome sign, the so-called core rate of inflation that omits food and energy prices jumped a sharp 0.6%. Wall Street had forecast a 0.4% gain.The increase in the core rate over the past year climbed to a new peak of 6.6% from 6.3%, marking the biggest gain in 40 years.The Fed views the core rate as a more accurate measure of future inflation trends.The cost of staples such as food, rent, medical care and new cars all rose last month.Inflation rose an average of less than 2% a year in the decade preceding the pandemic.Still, the higher cost of borrowing is expected to weaken the economy over the next year and pull inflation lower. Prices tend to fall when consumers spend less and demand for goods and services dry up.The Fed may have to raise rates so high to beat back inflation, however, that it could tip the economy into recession. The annual rate of inflation is more than quadruple the pre-pandemic levels of less than 2%.Top officials signaled they will do what it takes to beat down inflation -- even at the cost of recession -- at the Fed's last big meeting in September.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":531,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9917562091,"gmtCreate":1665542181513,"gmtModify":1676537624312,"author":{"id":"3554886109685293","authorId":"3554886109685293","name":"Expert126","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2d4304f2ec7fabd9d599a3ba8b2a17e0","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3554886109685293","idStr":"3554886109685293"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Okok","listText":"Okok","text":"Okok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9917562091","repostId":"2274501209","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2274501209","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1665541419,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2274501209?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-10-12 10:23","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Coal Miner Coronado Global Confirms Merger Talks With Peabody Energy","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2274501209","media":"Reuters","summary":"Oct 12 (Reuters) - Australian coal miner Coronado Global Resources confirmed on Wednesday it was in ","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Oct 12 (Reuters) - Australian coal miner <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CRN.AU\">Coronado Global</a> Resources confirmed on Wednesday it was in confidential discussions with <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BTU\">Peabody Energy Corp</a> regarding a potential &#34;combination transaction&#34;.</p><p>The Australian, citing sources, reported on Tuesday that discussions were happening in New York, but said there was no clarity on the nature of these talks.</p><p>As of Tuesday&#39;s close, Coronado had a market capitalization of A$3.26 billion ($2.05 billion), while U.S.-based Peabody was valued at $3.80 billion.</p><p>Stocks of both coal miners have sharply rallied this year, as customers from Europe to Asia scramble for alternative sources of fuel in the aftermath of the European Union&#39;s sanctions on gas-rich Russia.</p><p>Coronado had held merger talks with U.S.-based peer Arch Resources Inc earlier this year, but that didn&#39;t materialize into a deal.</p><p>Coronado, which owns coal mining facilities in Virginia and West Virginia state, said no agreement had been reached with Peabody and it did not divulge any details on a potential deal.</p><p>Peabody did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment. ($1 = 1.5936 Australian dollars)</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Coal Miner Coronado Global Confirms Merger Talks With Peabody Energy</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nCoal Miner Coronado Global Confirms Merger Talks With Peabody Energy\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-10-12 10:23</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>Oct 12 (Reuters) - Australian coal miner <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CRN.AU\">Coronado Global</a> Resources confirmed on Wednesday it was in confidential discussions with <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BTU\">Peabody Energy Corp</a> regarding a potential &#34;combination transaction&#34;.</p><p>The Australian, citing sources, reported on Tuesday that discussions were happening in New York, but said there was no clarity on the nature of these talks.</p><p>As of Tuesday&#39;s close, Coronado had a market capitalization of A$3.26 billion ($2.05 billion), while U.S.-based Peabody was valued at $3.80 billion.</p><p>Stocks of both coal miners have sharply rallied this year, as customers from Europe to Asia scramble for alternative sources of fuel in the aftermath of the European Union&#39;s sanctions on gas-rich Russia.</p><p>Coronado had held merger talks with U.S.-based peer Arch Resources Inc earlier this year, but that didn&#39;t materialize into a deal.</p><p>Coronado, which owns coal mining facilities in Virginia and West Virginia state, said no agreement had been reached with Peabody and it did not divulge any details on a potential deal.</p><p>Peabody did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment. ($1 = 1.5936 Australian dollars)</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"CRN.AU":"CORONADO GLOBAL RESOURCE-CDI","BTU":"Peabody"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2274501209","content_text":"Oct 12 (Reuters) - Australian coal miner Coronado Global Resources confirmed on Wednesday it was in confidential discussions with Peabody Energy Corp regarding a potential \"combination transaction\".The Australian, citing sources, reported on Tuesday that discussions were happening in New York, but said there was no clarity on the nature of these talks.As of Tuesday's close, Coronado had a market capitalization of A$3.26 billion ($2.05 billion), while U.S.-based Peabody was valued at $3.80 billion.Stocks of both coal miners have sharply rallied this year, as customers from Europe to Asia scramble for alternative sources of fuel in the aftermath of the European Union's sanctions on gas-rich Russia.Coronado had held merger talks with U.S.-based peer Arch Resources Inc earlier this year, but that didn't materialize into a deal.Coronado, which owns coal mining facilities in Virginia and West Virginia state, said no agreement had been reached with Peabody and it did not divulge any details on a potential deal.Peabody did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment. ($1 = 1.5936 Australian dollars)","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1212,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9914874369,"gmtCreate":1665264667451,"gmtModify":1676537578156,"author":{"id":"3554886109685293","authorId":"3554886109685293","name":"Expert126","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2d4304f2ec7fabd9d599a3ba8b2a17e0","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3554886109685293","idStr":"3554886109685293"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Okok","listText":"Okok","text":"Okok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9914874369","repostId":"2273833362","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2273833362","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1665186683,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2273833362?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-10-08 07:51","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Twitter-Elon Musk Deal Has Offered Investors Several Big Opportunities","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2273833362","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"A host of investors bet  on Twitter stock as the shares fell after Elon Musk pulled away from his in","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>A host of investors bet  on Twitter stock as the shares fell after Elon Musk pulled away from his initial offer to buy the social media giant. Why? Record profits stood to be made.</p><p>The outcome of the deal remains in doubt, even after Mr. Musk&#39;s surprising proposal earlier this week  to close it as originally approved after months trying to step away. Some investors have already cashed in.</p><p>But the opportunity for those willing to bet Twitter might get the full price after all was massive, according to Morgan Ricks, a Vanderbilt Law School professor who specializes in financial regulation:</p><p>-- Should the Twitter-Musk saga end with a buyout at the proposed price, $54.20, according to Mr. Ricks, it&#39;ll mark the second-biggest arbitrage opportunity for a cash buyout of at least $1 billion since at least 1996.</p><p>&#34;Prior to Tuesday, the market had been pricing in a roughly 50/50 chance of the deal going through,&#34; Mr. Ricks said.</p><p>At one point, the difference between Twitter&#39;s stock price and Mr. Musk&#39;s original offer was 66%, below the 76% record set by Blackstone Group&#39;s 2019 purchase of Tallgrass Energy.</p><p>The cost of that deal, however, was roughly $3.5 billion, far from the potential $44 billion bill for Twitter.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/88d2b85b17b20c85bf1c251838939843\" tg-width=\"704\" tg-height=\"718\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>Investors like Carl Icahn, Daniel Loeb&#39;s Third Point LLC, and D.E. Shaw Group have already profited from wagers on Twitter shares], which give the right to purchase shares at a specific price by a certain date. Some investors took a third route: convertible-bond arbitrage.</p><p>Doug Fincher, a portfolio manager at $3.8 billion hedge fund group Ionic Capital Management, said his fund bought Twitter&#39;s low-yielding convertible bonds, which could be changed into stock if Musk&#39;s deal went through.</p><p>-- Ionic&#39;s trade bet that the price of a bond expiring in 2026 would increase from the the mid-$80s, where it sat in April after cracks emerged in the likelihood of closure, to near $100 should the deal complete. Mr. Fincher said his firm sold its bonds when the price hit $98 on Tuesday after reports that Musk was willing to purchase the company at the original price.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d541f8ec5d15576cd58bb03b82751d0e\" tg-width=\"853\" tg-height=\"656\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Twitter-Elon Musk Deal Has Offered Investors Several Big Opportunities</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTwitter-Elon Musk Deal Has Offered Investors Several Big Opportunities\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-10-08 07:51</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>A host of investors bet  on Twitter stock as the shares fell after Elon Musk pulled away from his initial offer to buy the social media giant. Why? Record profits stood to be made.</p><p>The outcome of the deal remains in doubt, even after Mr. Musk&#39;s surprising proposal earlier this week  to close it as originally approved after months trying to step away. Some investors have already cashed in.</p><p>But the opportunity for those willing to bet Twitter might get the full price after all was massive, according to Morgan Ricks, a Vanderbilt Law School professor who specializes in financial regulation:</p><p>-- Should the Twitter-Musk saga end with a buyout at the proposed price, $54.20, according to Mr. Ricks, it&#39;ll mark the second-biggest arbitrage opportunity for a cash buyout of at least $1 billion since at least 1996.</p><p>&#34;Prior to Tuesday, the market had been pricing in a roughly 50/50 chance of the deal going through,&#34; Mr. Ricks said.</p><p>At one point, the difference between Twitter&#39;s stock price and Mr. Musk&#39;s original offer was 66%, below the 76% record set by Blackstone Group&#39;s 2019 purchase of Tallgrass Energy.</p><p>The cost of that deal, however, was roughly $3.5 billion, far from the potential $44 billion bill for Twitter.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/88d2b85b17b20c85bf1c251838939843\" tg-width=\"704\" tg-height=\"718\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>Investors like Carl Icahn, Daniel Loeb&#39;s Third Point LLC, and D.E. Shaw Group have already profited from wagers on Twitter shares], which give the right to purchase shares at a specific price by a certain date. Some investors took a third route: convertible-bond arbitrage.</p><p>Doug Fincher, a portfolio manager at $3.8 billion hedge fund group Ionic Capital Management, said his fund bought Twitter&#39;s low-yielding convertible bonds, which could be changed into stock if Musk&#39;s deal went through.</p><p>-- Ionic&#39;s trade bet that the price of a bond expiring in 2026 would increase from the the mid-$80s, where it sat in April after cracks emerged in the likelihood of closure, to near $100 should the deal complete. Mr. Fincher said his firm sold its bonds when the price hit $98 on Tuesday after reports that Musk was willing to purchase the company at the original price.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d541f8ec5d15576cd58bb03b82751d0e\" tg-width=\"853\" tg-height=\"656\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BK4533":"AQR资本管理(全球第二大对冲基金)","BK4555":"新能源车","BK4211":"区域性银行","BK4077":"互动媒体与服务","BK4511":"特斯拉概念","BK4527":"明星科技股","BK4579":"人工智能","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓","QNETCN":"纳斯达克中美互联网老虎指数","BK4574":"无人驾驶","BK4551":"寇图资本持仓","BK4581":"高盛持仓","ISBC":"投资者银行","BK4099":"汽车制造商","BK4508":"社交媒体","BK4548":"巴美列捷福持仓","BK4516":"特朗普概念","TWTR":"Twitter","TSLA":"特斯拉","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2273833362","content_text":"A host of investors bet  on Twitter stock as the shares fell after Elon Musk pulled away from his initial offer to buy the social media giant. Why? Record profits stood to be made.The outcome of the deal remains in doubt, even after Mr. Musk's surprising proposal earlier this week  to close it as originally approved after months trying to step away. Some investors have already cashed in.But the opportunity for those willing to bet Twitter might get the full price after all was massive, according to Morgan Ricks, a Vanderbilt Law School professor who specializes in financial regulation:-- Should the Twitter-Musk saga end with a buyout at the proposed price, $54.20, according to Mr. Ricks, it'll mark the second-biggest arbitrage opportunity for a cash buyout of at least $1 billion since at least 1996.\"Prior to Tuesday, the market had been pricing in a roughly 50/50 chance of the deal going through,\" Mr. Ricks said.At one point, the difference between Twitter's stock price and Mr. Musk's original offer was 66%, below the 76% record set by Blackstone Group's 2019 purchase of Tallgrass Energy.The cost of that deal, however, was roughly $3.5 billion, far from the potential $44 billion bill for Twitter.Investors like Carl Icahn, Daniel Loeb's Third Point LLC, and D.E. Shaw Group have already profited from wagers on Twitter shares], which give the right to purchase shares at a specific price by a certain date. Some investors took a third route: convertible-bond arbitrage.Doug Fincher, a portfolio manager at $3.8 billion hedge fund group Ionic Capital Management, said his fund bought Twitter's low-yielding convertible bonds, which could be changed into stock if Musk's deal went through.-- Ionic's trade bet that the price of a bond expiring in 2026 would increase from the the mid-$80s, where it sat in April after cracks emerged in the likelihood of closure, to near $100 should the deal complete. Mr. Fincher said his firm sold its bonds when the price hit $98 on Tuesday after reports that Musk was willing to purchase the company at the original price.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":341,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9914109860,"gmtCreate":1665194735750,"gmtModify":1676537570983,"author":{"id":"3554886109685293","authorId":"3554886109685293","name":"Expert126","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2d4304f2ec7fabd9d599a3ba8b2a17e0","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3554886109685293","idStr":"3554886109685293"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Okok","listText":"Okok","text":"Okok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9914109860","repostId":"1116161119","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1116161119","pubTimestamp":1665185287,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1116161119?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-10-08 07:28","market":"sg","language":"en","title":"SGX Weekly Review: SATS, Singapore Bank Home Loan Rates and Singapore Retail Sales","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1116161119","media":"smart investor","summary":"Welcome to this week’s edition of top stock market highlights where we bring you the latest news and","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Welcome to this week’s edition of top stock market highlights where we bring you the latest news and corporate events.</p><h2><b>Bank home loan rates</b></h2><p>The trio of local banks, namely <b>DBS Group</b>(SGX: D05), <b>United Overseas Bank Ltd</b>(SGX: U11), or UOB, and <b>OCBC Ltd</b>(SGX: O39), have once again raised the rates on their mortgage loan offerings.</p><p>The latest increase is in line withrising interest ratesas the US Federal Reserve hikes its benchmark policy rate to deal withsurging inflation.</p><p>Singapore’s largest bank, DBS, is raising its fixed-rate housing loan interest rate to 3.5% from the earlier 2.75%.</p><p>This new rate now applies to all four of the lender’s packages with tenors of between two to five years.</p><p>Meanwhile, UOB announced that its two-year and three-year fixed-rate home loans bear interest rates of 3.75% and 3.85%, respectively.</p><p>Not to be outdone, OCBC has revised its two-year fixed rate to 3.5%, up from 2.98% just a fortnight ago.</p><p>The bank is also re-launching its one-year fixed rate package at 3.35%.</p><p>With higher rates across the board, homeowners should be prepared to fork out more in interest payments when they refinance their housing loans.</p><h2><b>Singapore retail sales</b></h2><p>Retail sales continued to rise in Singapore in August, continuing the trend seen in July.</p><p>Sales increased 13% year on year in August, slightly lower than the 13.9% year on year chalked up in the previous month.</p><p>The latest increase did fall below the 15.4% that analysts had expected.</p><p>The estimated total retail sales value for August came in at S$3.8 billion, of which online sales took up a 12.5% share.</p><p>Despite the slightly weaker numbers, August’s retail sales still represented a fifth consecutive month of double-digit year on year growth.</p><p>At the same time, elevated core inflation could dampen consumer demand in the months to come.</p><p>Along with higher interest rates, more households may tighten their belts and cut back on spending to service higher mortgage payments.</p><h2><b>SATS Ltd (SGX: S58)</b></h2><p>SATS has seen its share price lose a fifth of its value since it announced theacquisition of Worldwide Flight Servicesfor almost S$1.64 billion.</p><p>Investors were concerned that the ground handler will finance the deal with a potential rights issue to raise the required S$1.7 billion to finance the purchase.</p><p>CEO Kerry Mok has come out to assure investors that the group is looking out for their interests and that a rights issue is one of four funding sources for the mega-deal.</p><p>He also acknowledged that SATS will have to scale down the size of the rights issue as in his own words: “the market does not like rights issues”.</p><p>In its original announcement for the acquisition, SATS had presented a funding plan that will involve the issuance of 609 million new shares at S$2.79 apiece.</p><p>The rights issue price was a steep discount of 28% to the food caterer’s then-closing price of S$3.87.</p><p>Other funding sources put forward include an acquisition bridge facility of €1.2 billion (around S$1.7 billion), internal cash resources, and new strategic investors.</p><p>The group may also tap into a mixture of the four sources to come up with an optimal plan to fund the acquisition.</p><p>Mok reiterated that investors should take a medium to long-term view of this deal as it will bring about tremendous benefits to SATS.</p></body></html>","source":"lsy1602567310727","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>SGX Weekly Review: SATS, Singapore Bank Home Loan Rates and Singapore Retail Sales</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSGX Weekly Review: SATS, Singapore Bank Home Loan Rates and Singapore Retail Sales\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-10-08 07:28 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://thesmartinvestor.com.sg/top-stock-market-highlights-of-the-week-sats-elon-musk-twitter-singapore-bank-home-loan-rates-and-singapore-retail-sales/><strong>smart investor</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Welcome to this week’s edition of top stock market highlights where we bring you the latest news and corporate events.Bank home loan ratesThe trio of local banks, namely DBS Group(SGX: D05), United ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://thesmartinvestor.com.sg/top-stock-market-highlights-of-the-week-sats-elon-musk-twitter-singapore-bank-home-loan-rates-and-singapore-retail-sales/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"STI.SI":"富时新加坡海峡指数","S58.SI":"新翔集团有限公司"},"source_url":"https://thesmartinvestor.com.sg/top-stock-market-highlights-of-the-week-sats-elon-musk-twitter-singapore-bank-home-loan-rates-and-singapore-retail-sales/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1116161119","content_text":"Welcome to this week’s edition of top stock market highlights where we bring you the latest news and corporate events.Bank home loan ratesThe trio of local banks, namely DBS Group(SGX: D05), United Overseas Bank Ltd(SGX: U11), or UOB, and OCBC Ltd(SGX: O39), have once again raised the rates on their mortgage loan offerings.The latest increase is in line withrising interest ratesas the US Federal Reserve hikes its benchmark policy rate to deal withsurging inflation.Singapore’s largest bank, DBS, is raising its fixed-rate housing loan interest rate to 3.5% from the earlier 2.75%.This new rate now applies to all four of the lender’s packages with tenors of between two to five years.Meanwhile, UOB announced that its two-year and three-year fixed-rate home loans bear interest rates of 3.75% and 3.85%, respectively.Not to be outdone, OCBC has revised its two-year fixed rate to 3.5%, up from 2.98% just a fortnight ago.The bank is also re-launching its one-year fixed rate package at 3.35%.With higher rates across the board, homeowners should be prepared to fork out more in interest payments when they refinance their housing loans.Singapore retail salesRetail sales continued to rise in Singapore in August, continuing the trend seen in July.Sales increased 13% year on year in August, slightly lower than the 13.9% year on year chalked up in the previous month.The latest increase did fall below the 15.4% that analysts had expected.The estimated total retail sales value for August came in at S$3.8 billion, of which online sales took up a 12.5% share.Despite the slightly weaker numbers, August’s retail sales still represented a fifth consecutive month of double-digit year on year growth.At the same time, elevated core inflation could dampen consumer demand in the months to come.Along with higher interest rates, more households may tighten their belts and cut back on spending to service higher mortgage payments.SATS Ltd (SGX: S58)SATS has seen its share price lose a fifth of its value since it announced theacquisition of Worldwide Flight Servicesfor almost S$1.64 billion.Investors were concerned that the ground handler will finance the deal with a potential rights issue to raise the required S$1.7 billion to finance the purchase.CEO Kerry Mok has come out to assure investors that the group is looking out for their interests and that a rights issue is one of four funding sources for the mega-deal.He also acknowledged that SATS will have to scale down the size of the rights issue as in his own words: “the market does not like rights issues”.In its original announcement for the acquisition, SATS had presented a funding plan that will involve the issuance of 609 million new shares at S$2.79 apiece.The rights issue price was a steep discount of 28% to the food caterer’s then-closing price of S$3.87.Other funding sources put forward include an acquisition bridge facility of €1.2 billion (around S$1.7 billion), internal cash resources, and new strategic investors.The group may also tap into a mixture of the four sources to come up with an optimal plan to fund the acquisition.Mok reiterated that investors should take a medium to long-term view of this deal as it will bring about tremendous benefits to SATS.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":728,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9914969324,"gmtCreate":1665158149968,"gmtModify":1676537566308,"author":{"id":"3554886109685293","authorId":"3554886109685293","name":"Expert126","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2d4304f2ec7fabd9d599a3ba8b2a17e0","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3554886109685293","idStr":"3554886109685293"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Okok","listText":"Okok","text":"Okok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":4,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9914969324","repostId":"2273816362","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2273816362","pubTimestamp":1665156353,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2273816362?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-10-07 23:25","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Is Now the Right Time to Buy Netflix Stock?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2273816362","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"The leading streaming service is up 28% in the past three months.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>We&#39;re slightly more than nine months into 2022, and <b>Netflix</b> shares are down 62% for the year. For a stock that produced a remarkable return of 6,000% from the start of 2012 through the end of 2021, this is a rude awakening.</p><p>The streaming industry is becoming hyper-competitive, a fact that management can no longer ignore. What&#39;s more, Netflix itself is undergoing a major strategic shift in an effort to spur growth once again. Should investors buy the top streaming stock today? Let&#39;s take a closer look.</p><h2>Recent troubles</h2><p>Netflix has had a rough time in 2022, losing a combined 1.2 million subscribers in the first six months of the year. This is a far cry from the massive customer additions investors have become used to seeing in recent years. And unsurprisingly, revenue growth has dramatically slowed. Sales of $8 billion in the second quarter were up just 8.6% year over year, the slowest pace in at least the last nine years.</p><p>I really think this shift comes down to one key factor: the intense competition for consumers&#39; eyeballs. With a seemingly unlimited number of streaming options on the market, Netflix is no longer the only game in town -- not to mention all of the other entertainment choices people have that don&#39;t involve staring at a screen.</p><p>The company is set to announce Q3 financial results on Tuesday, Oct. 18. Management expects the business to increase revenue by 4.7% year over year, and forecasts 1 million net new subscribers. A strong showing will certainly support a higher stock price.</p><h2>Growth outlook</h2><p>Despite recent headwinds, Netflix&#39;s global opportunity is still massive. There are currently roughly 800 million broadband households worldwide (excluding China, where Netflix isn&#39;t offered), a figure that can be viewed as Netflix&#39;s total addressable market. With 221 million subscribers today, there&#39;s still a large growth opportunity ahead.</p><p>It&#39;s starting to look like Netflix&#39;s most mature markets, the U.S. and Canada, are saturated, as these two countries lost a combined 1.9 million members over the past two quarters. Therefore, international markets will be the key driver when it comes to attracting more customers. The Asia-Pacific region, in particular, is the fastest growing segment for Netflix, adding almost 7 million subscribers over the last four quarters.</p><p>To boost the company&#39;s prospects, management earlier this year announced plans to introduce a cheaper, ad-supported subscription tier. Reed Hastings, Netflix&#39;s co-founder and co-CEO, long rejected this idea because he thought it would damage the brand and consumer experience. But with growth hitting a wall, and heightened competition in the industry, this seems like a no-brainer strategic move.</p><p>The company believes that some 40 million accounts will be signed up for this option by the end of Q3 2023. But undoubtedly, some customers who pay for the ad-free version will move over to the lower-cost option, making it hard to pinpoint the incremental revenue opportunity. Partnering with tech giant <b>Microsoft</b> on this endeavor, Netflix will make its ad-based subscription option available in select markets starting in November.</p><p>It&#39;s also worth mentioning Netflix&#39;s gaming push. While the company wants to bring more games to market in order to raise the value proposition of being a Netflix subscriber, and has purchased multiple studios to help this initiative, gaming hasn&#39;t moved the financial needle just yet.</p><h2>Current valuation</h2><p>After hitting an all-time high closing price of $692 last November, Netflix shares are down 67%. And as a result, the stock is currently trading hands at a price-to-earnings ratio of under 21, which is about as cheap as it has been at any point over the past decade. This simple metric signals an attractive entry price.</p><p>However, looking at Netflix&#39;s earnings might not be the right approach to valuation. This is because the company spends huge amounts of cash on content -- more than $17 billion in 2021 -- rendering accounting profits essentially meaningless. Therefore, the price-to-sales (P/S) multiple might be more appropriate in this situation. Currently, the P/S ratio stands at 3.4, about half the trailing 10-year average. Again, this shows us that Netflix stock is cheap by historical measures.</p><p>It certainly looks like the monster growth that investors have expecting from Netflix over the past decade is coming to an end. But that doesn&#39;t mean it&#39;s time to abandon the stock. In fact, the business, which has long been a cash-burning machine, is on the cusp of generating sustainable positive free cash flow, starting with this year. Add this to an undemanding valuation, and investors should consider buying shares in the streaming pioneer now.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Is Now the Right Time to Buy Netflix Stock?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nIs Now the Right Time to Buy Netflix Stock?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-10-07 23:25 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/10/07/is-now-the-right-time-to-buy-netflix-stock/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>We're slightly more than nine months into 2022, and Netflix shares are down 62% for the year. For a stock that produced a remarkable return of 6,000% from the start of 2012 through the end of 2021, ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/10/07/is-now-the-right-time-to-buy-netflix-stock/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NFLX":"奈飞"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/10/07/is-now-the-right-time-to-buy-netflix-stock/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2273816362","content_text":"We're slightly more than nine months into 2022, and Netflix shares are down 62% for the year. For a stock that produced a remarkable return of 6,000% from the start of 2012 through the end of 2021, this is a rude awakening.The streaming industry is becoming hyper-competitive, a fact that management can no longer ignore. What's more, Netflix itself is undergoing a major strategic shift in an effort to spur growth once again. Should investors buy the top streaming stock today? Let's take a closer look.Recent troublesNetflix has had a rough time in 2022, losing a combined 1.2 million subscribers in the first six months of the year. This is a far cry from the massive customer additions investors have become used to seeing in recent years. And unsurprisingly, revenue growth has dramatically slowed. Sales of $8 billion in the second quarter were up just 8.6% year over year, the slowest pace in at least the last nine years.I really think this shift comes down to one key factor: the intense competition for consumers' eyeballs. With a seemingly unlimited number of streaming options on the market, Netflix is no longer the only game in town -- not to mention all of the other entertainment choices people have that don't involve staring at a screen.The company is set to announce Q3 financial results on Tuesday, Oct. 18. Management expects the business to increase revenue by 4.7% year over year, and forecasts 1 million net new subscribers. A strong showing will certainly support a higher stock price.Growth outlookDespite recent headwinds, Netflix's global opportunity is still massive. There are currently roughly 800 million broadband households worldwide (excluding China, where Netflix isn't offered), a figure that can be viewed as Netflix's total addressable market. With 221 million subscribers today, there's still a large growth opportunity ahead.It's starting to look like Netflix's most mature markets, the U.S. and Canada, are saturated, as these two countries lost a combined 1.9 million members over the past two quarters. Therefore, international markets will be the key driver when it comes to attracting more customers. The Asia-Pacific region, in particular, is the fastest growing segment for Netflix, adding almost 7 million subscribers over the last four quarters.To boost the company's prospects, management earlier this year announced plans to introduce a cheaper, ad-supported subscription tier. Reed Hastings, Netflix's co-founder and co-CEO, long rejected this idea because he thought it would damage the brand and consumer experience. But with growth hitting a wall, and heightened competition in the industry, this seems like a no-brainer strategic move.The company believes that some 40 million accounts will be signed up for this option by the end of Q3 2023. But undoubtedly, some customers who pay for the ad-free version will move over to the lower-cost option, making it hard to pinpoint the incremental revenue opportunity. Partnering with tech giant Microsoft on this endeavor, Netflix will make its ad-based subscription option available in select markets starting in November.It's also worth mentioning Netflix's gaming push. While the company wants to bring more games to market in order to raise the value proposition of being a Netflix subscriber, and has purchased multiple studios to help this initiative, gaming hasn't moved the financial needle just yet.Current valuationAfter hitting an all-time high closing price of $692 last November, Netflix shares are down 67%. And as a result, the stock is currently trading hands at a price-to-earnings ratio of under 21, which is about as cheap as it has been at any point over the past decade. This simple metric signals an attractive entry price.However, looking at Netflix's earnings might not be the right approach to valuation. This is because the company spends huge amounts of cash on content -- more than $17 billion in 2021 -- rendering accounting profits essentially meaningless. Therefore, the price-to-sales (P/S) multiple might be more appropriate in this situation. Currently, the P/S ratio stands at 3.4, about half the trailing 10-year average. Again, this shows us that Netflix stock is cheap by historical measures.It certainly looks like the monster growth that investors have expecting from Netflix over the past decade is coming to an end. But that doesn't mean it's time to abandon the stock. In fact, the business, which has long been a cash-burning machine, is on the cusp of generating sustainable positive free cash flow, starting with this year. Add this to an undemanding valuation, and investors should consider buying shares in the streaming pioneer now.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":359,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9915811684,"gmtCreate":1665011785348,"gmtModify":1676537542219,"author":{"id":"3554886109685293","authorId":"3554886109685293","name":"Expert126","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2d4304f2ec7fabd9d599a3ba8b2a17e0","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3554886109685293","idStr":"3554886109685293"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Whay","listText":"Whay","text":"Whay","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9915811684","repostId":"2273819339","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2273819339","pubTimestamp":1665044654,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2273819339?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-10-06 16:24","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Down 30% to 50%, These Stocks Are Essential Bear Market Buys","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2273819339","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"These market leaders are dirt cheap right now.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>The bear market is a dark cloud. But it does have a silver lining. And that&#39;s the fact that it&#39;s giving us the opportunity to buy fabulous companies at bargain prices. These are companies that have demonstrated earnings strength in the past -- and have promising long-term prospects.</p><p>The thing about a bear market is it doesn&#39;t just hurt struggling companies. It also weighs on the performance of solid companies that could boost your portfolio over the long haul. The stocks I&#39;ll mention here have lost 30% to 50% this year. But they have what it takes to rebound -- and thrive over time. Let&#39;s check out these three essential bear market buys.</p><h2>1. Home Depot</h2><p><b>Home Depot</b> has slipped 31% this year -- even as the company&#39;s earnings hit a major milestone. In the second quarter, Home Depot reported its highest quarterly sales and profit ever. And these figures reach into the billions of dollars. The world&#39;s biggest home improvement retailer reported sales of more than $43 billion and net earnings of $5.2 billion.</p><p>That&#39;s quite an accomplishment considering the pressures of higher inflation and supply chain issues. Home Depot has managed today&#39;s supply chain problems by investing in higher in-stock levels and its own new supply chain facilities, for example.</p><p>The company also hasn&#39;t changed its policy of rewarding investors. In the quarter, it paid out about $2 billion in dividends and $1.5 billion in the form of share repurchases. So, an investment in Home Depot won&#39;t only bring you the possibility of share gains -- it also offers you a passive income source.</p><p>Home Depot shares are suffering now as investors avoid companies linked to the idea of economic growth. The concern is building projects will slow if economic woes persist.</p><p>But here are two reasons to be optimistic. First, Home Depot&#39;s professional customers say their project backlogs remain strong. And second, even if projects do slow, that slowdown will be temporary. As we know, times of economic trouble don&#39;t last forever.</p><p>Today, Home Depot trades for 17 times forward earnings estimates. That&#39;s down from about 28 earlier this year. At the same time, revenue continues to rise. This looks like a bargain for a great long-term stock.</p><h2>2. Etsy</h2><p><b>Etsy</b> shares have tumbled more than 50% this year. Etsy, an online platform that brings together sellers and buyers of handmade goods, soared during the early stages of the pandemic. That&#39;s as consumers stayed home and focused on shopping online.</p><p>Today, investors worry that Etsy&#39;s best days are in the past. But there&#39;s evidence Etsy is just getting started. Of course, the pandemic boosted Etsy&#39;s business. It grew from 46 million active buyers before the pandemic to 90 million by the end of last year.</p><p>Sure, growth has slowed. But Etsy has managed to keep 88 million of those active buyers. And those buyers are spending as much on Etsy as they did before or slightly more.</p><p>Etsy&#39;s recent acquisitions of Depop and Elo7 added to employee compensation expenses -- and that weighed on net income in the second quarter. It slipped about 25% to $73 million. But Etsy&#39;s overall revenue rose more than 10%. And the acquisitions offer important growth drivers for Etsy down the road. Depop is an online fashion resale marketplace, and Elo7 is a Brazilian online seller of handmade goods.</p><p>It&#39;s also important to note that Etsy still has a lot of room for growth. If you&#39;re like me and shop on Etsy, you may have the impression that <i>everyone</i> knows about this platform. But, in the U.S. and the U.K., 70% of women and 90% of men actually haven&#39;t yet shopped on Etsy over the past 12 months.</p><p>So, Etsy&#39;s revenue is growing and the company is profitable -- and it still has great opportunity to win over more customers. At the same time, the stock is trading at 28 times forward earnings estimates. That&#39;s down from about 50 at the start of the year. Considering Etsy&#39;s ability to keep shoppers coming back and the room for growth, the stock looks like a steal right now.</p><h2>3. Amazon</h2><p>The current economic climate hasn&#39;t been easy for <b>Amazon</b>. The company has struggled with higher transport costs, supply chain challenges, and excess fulfillment capacity. As a result, Amazon&#39;s usually stellar earnings reports soured.</p><p>For the past few quarters, Amazon has reported declines in operating cash flow and operating income, for example. So why do I favor buying Amazon right now? Because today&#39;s troubles are temporary and don&#39;t change the overall strength of the business.</p><p>Amazon is a leader in two growing businesses: e-commerce and cloud computing. E-commerce is hurting right now. But the overall outlook for e-commerce is positive. Global retail e-commerce is expected to climb by 56% to reach $8.1 trillion in 2026, according to Statista.</p><p>As for cloud computing, Amazon Web Services (AWS) continues to grow operating income and revenue in the double-digits. And AWS generally makes up most of Amazon&#39;s total operating income. So, it&#39;s a key profit driver for the company.</p><p>Amazon also is showing signs of progress in the management of today&#39;s difficult times. The company said during the second-quarter earnings report that it was controlling costs and improving productivity across its fulfillment network.</p><p>Today, Amazon trades at about 2.4 times sales. This is around its lowest level in at least five years. At the same time, revenue continues to climb. So, this bear market price is a very reasonable one for a company that has what it takes to rebound and flourish down the road.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Down 30% to 50%, These Stocks Are Essential Bear Market Buys</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nDown 30% to 50%, These Stocks Are Essential Bear Market Buys\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-10-06 16:24 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/10/05/down-30-50-percent-here-are-bear-market-buys/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The bear market is a dark cloud. But it does have a silver lining. And that's the fact that it's giving us the opportunity to buy fabulous companies at bargain prices. These are companies that have ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/10/05/down-30-50-percent-here-are-bear-market-buys/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AMZN":"亚马逊","HD":"家得宝","ETSY":"Etsy, Inc."},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/10/05/down-30-50-percent-here-are-bear-market-buys/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2273819339","content_text":"The bear market is a dark cloud. But it does have a silver lining. And that's the fact that it's giving us the opportunity to buy fabulous companies at bargain prices. These are companies that have demonstrated earnings strength in the past -- and have promising long-term prospects.The thing about a bear market is it doesn't just hurt struggling companies. It also weighs on the performance of solid companies that could boost your portfolio over the long haul. The stocks I'll mention here have lost 30% to 50% this year. But they have what it takes to rebound -- and thrive over time. Let's check out these three essential bear market buys.1. Home DepotHome Depot has slipped 31% this year -- even as the company's earnings hit a major milestone. In the second quarter, Home Depot reported its highest quarterly sales and profit ever. And these figures reach into the billions of dollars. The world's biggest home improvement retailer reported sales of more than $43 billion and net earnings of $5.2 billion.That's quite an accomplishment considering the pressures of higher inflation and supply chain issues. Home Depot has managed today's supply chain problems by investing in higher in-stock levels and its own new supply chain facilities, for example.The company also hasn't changed its policy of rewarding investors. In the quarter, it paid out about $2 billion in dividends and $1.5 billion in the form of share repurchases. So, an investment in Home Depot won't only bring you the possibility of share gains -- it also offers you a passive income source.Home Depot shares are suffering now as investors avoid companies linked to the idea of economic growth. The concern is building projects will slow if economic woes persist.But here are two reasons to be optimistic. First, Home Depot's professional customers say their project backlogs remain strong. And second, even if projects do slow, that slowdown will be temporary. As we know, times of economic trouble don't last forever.Today, Home Depot trades for 17 times forward earnings estimates. That's down from about 28 earlier this year. At the same time, revenue continues to rise. This looks like a bargain for a great long-term stock.2. EtsyEtsy shares have tumbled more than 50% this year. Etsy, an online platform that brings together sellers and buyers of handmade goods, soared during the early stages of the pandemic. That's as consumers stayed home and focused on shopping online.Today, investors worry that Etsy's best days are in the past. But there's evidence Etsy is just getting started. Of course, the pandemic boosted Etsy's business. It grew from 46 million active buyers before the pandemic to 90 million by the end of last year.Sure, growth has slowed. But Etsy has managed to keep 88 million of those active buyers. And those buyers are spending as much on Etsy as they did before or slightly more.Etsy's recent acquisitions of Depop and Elo7 added to employee compensation expenses -- and that weighed on net income in the second quarter. It slipped about 25% to $73 million. But Etsy's overall revenue rose more than 10%. And the acquisitions offer important growth drivers for Etsy down the road. Depop is an online fashion resale marketplace, and Elo7 is a Brazilian online seller of handmade goods.It's also important to note that Etsy still has a lot of room for growth. If you're like me and shop on Etsy, you may have the impression that everyone knows about this platform. But, in the U.S. and the U.K., 70% of women and 90% of men actually haven't yet shopped on Etsy over the past 12 months.So, Etsy's revenue is growing and the company is profitable -- and it still has great opportunity to win over more customers. At the same time, the stock is trading at 28 times forward earnings estimates. That's down from about 50 at the start of the year. Considering Etsy's ability to keep shoppers coming back and the room for growth, the stock looks like a steal right now.3. AmazonThe current economic climate hasn't been easy for Amazon. The company has struggled with higher transport costs, supply chain challenges, and excess fulfillment capacity. As a result, Amazon's usually stellar earnings reports soured.For the past few quarters, Amazon has reported declines in operating cash flow and operating income, for example. So why do I favor buying Amazon right now? Because today's troubles are temporary and don't change the overall strength of the business.Amazon is a leader in two growing businesses: e-commerce and cloud computing. E-commerce is hurting right now. But the overall outlook for e-commerce is positive. Global retail e-commerce is expected to climb by 56% to reach $8.1 trillion in 2026, according to Statista.As for cloud computing, Amazon Web Services (AWS) continues to grow operating income and revenue in the double-digits. And AWS generally makes up most of Amazon's total operating income. So, it's a key profit driver for the company.Amazon also is showing signs of progress in the management of today's difficult times. The company said during the second-quarter earnings report that it was controlling costs and improving productivity across its fulfillment network.Today, Amazon trades at about 2.4 times sales. This is around its lowest level in at least five years. At the same time, revenue continues to climb. So, this bear market price is a very reasonable one for a company that has what it takes to rebound and flourish down the road.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":396,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9915005927,"gmtCreate":1664924626170,"gmtModify":1676537528120,"author":{"id":"3554886109685293","authorId":"3554886109685293","name":"Expert126","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2d4304f2ec7fabd9d599a3ba8b2a17e0","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3554886109685293","idStr":"3554886109685293"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Okok","listText":"Okok","text":"Okok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9915005927","repostId":"1199478911","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1199478911","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1664892736,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1199478911?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-10-04 22:12","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Meme Stocks Rallied in Morning Trading, With Biocryst Pharmaceuticals Jumping Over 10% and Express Jumping Over 8%","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1199478911","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Meme stocks rallied in morning trading, with Biocryst Pharmaceuticals jumping over 10% and Express, ","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Meme stocks rallied in morning trading, with <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BCRX\">Biocryst Pharmaceuticals</a> jumping over 10% and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/EXPR\">Express, Inc.</a> jumping over 8%.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1ba7991ee7cd6ef33be022cac1e6bf27\" tg-width=\"266\" tg-height=\"451\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Meme Stocks Rallied in Morning Trading, With Biocryst Pharmaceuticals Jumping Over 10% and Express Jumping Over 8%</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nMeme Stocks Rallied in Morning Trading, With Biocryst Pharmaceuticals Jumping Over 10% and Express Jumping Over 8%\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-10-04 22:12</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>Meme stocks rallied in morning trading, with <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BCRX\">Biocryst Pharmaceuticals</a> jumping over 10% and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/EXPR\">Express, Inc.</a> jumping over 8%.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1ba7991ee7cd6ef33be022cac1e6bf27\" tg-width=\"266\" tg-height=\"451\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"EXPR":"Express, Inc.","BCRX":"BioCryst制药"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1199478911","content_text":"Meme stocks rallied in morning trading, with Biocryst Pharmaceuticals jumping over 10% and Express, Inc. jumping over 8%.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":153,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9912208549,"gmtCreate":1664839104182,"gmtModify":1676537515169,"author":{"id":"3554886109685293","authorId":"3554886109685293","name":"Expert126","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2d4304f2ec7fabd9d599a3ba8b2a17e0","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3554886109685293","idStr":"3554886109685293"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Okok","listText":"Okok","text":"Okok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9912208549","repostId":"2272199820","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2272199820","pubTimestamp":1664896561,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2272199820?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-10-04 23:16","market":"us","language":"en","title":"3 Stocks to Avoid This Week","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2272199820","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"These investments seem pretty vulnerable right now.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Investors can&#39;t seem to catch a break these days. The &#34;three stocks to avoid&#34; in my column last week that I thought were going to lose to the market -- <b>Cracker Barrel Old Country Store</b>, <b>Rite Aid</b>, and <b>Lennar</b> -- fell 6%, 29%, and 3%, respectively, averaging out to a 12.7% decline.</p><p>The <b>S&amp;P 500</b> experienced a 2.9% move lower, so I was correct. I have been right in 32 of the past 50 weeks, or 64% of the time.</p><p>Now let&#39;s look at the week ahead. I see <b>Apple</b>, <b>Conagra Brands</b>, and <b>Gold Fields</b> as stocks you might want to consider steering clear of this week. Let&#39;s go over my near-term concerns with all three investments.</p><h2><b>1. Apple</b></h2><p>The country&#39;s most valuable company by market cap -- the only one currently perched above $2 trillion in value -- proved mortal last week. The consumer tech giant tumbled 8%, a big drop for a titan that was previously holding up well against the correcting market. Apple is finally trading closer to its 52-week low than its high.</p><p>The new iPhone 14 may have generated some buzz when it was unveiled a few weeks ago, but consumers have tired of annual upgrade cycles for smartphones. The incremental improvements are nice, but they may not be enough to woo shoppers who are already clutching their savings harder than they have in a long time.</p><p>There was a notable analyst downgrade last week. Wamsi Mohan at <b>Bank of America</b> thinks the global climate of inflation, rising interest rates, and geopolitical conflict will weigh on the previously waterproof Apple stock. As a company with heavy volume outside the U.S. market, it&#39;s worth noting that the strong dollar will eat into reported revenue from those overseas transactions. There was also a Bloomberg story reporting that Apple is asking suppliers to pare back iPhone 14 production in light of uninspiring global demand.</p><p>Is Apple overvalued at 23 times trailing earnings? Apple is a company that seems to have one good fiscal year followed by two years of single-digit and sometimes even negative revenue growth. It could bounce back after last week&#39;s setback, but when I see all those wireless company ads pitching iPhones for practically nothing, I see a behemoth behind an aspirational brand that could be in trouble.</p><h2><b>2. Conagra Brands</b></h2><p>Instinctively, you don&#39;t want to bet against Conagra Brands. It&#39;s the company that stocks supermarket shelves with Duncan Hines cake mix, Slim Jim jerky, and Hunt&#39;s ketchup. Even in a recession, we have to eat. The problem for a king of brands is that rising food prices are probably sending shoppers to lower-margin house brands. Why buy Conagra&#39;s Pam or Reddi-Wip when the store-brand version of the cooking spray or whipped cream is easier on the pocket?</p><p>Conagra reports financial results for its fiscal first quarter on Thursday morning. Analysts aren&#39;t holding out for much, and it&#39;s not as if Conagra is an upbeat earnings surprise machine after beating Wall Street profit targets just once over the past three reports. The market sees Conagra growing its revenue by less than 5% this fiscal year, with earnings per share rising even less than that. Sales are expected to slow to just 1% growth next fiscal year. The 3.8% yield should provide some support, but it&#39;s not exactly the safe haven it plays itself out to be.</p><h2><b>3. Gold Fields</b></h2><p>September was brutal. It was the market&#39;s worst month since March 2020. It was also the worst September -- a month that has historically been challenging -- in 20 years. The bear market may not be over, but it wouldn&#39;t surprise me if there was at least a small bounce early in October. This call finds me eyeing Gold Fields.</p><p>I&#39;m not an expert on South African gold mining stocks, but I saw what happened last week. As most stocks tumbled, precious metals proved shiny. Half of the 10 largest stocks to gain at least 10% last week were gold miners, and Gold Fields commands the largest market of the five stocks on that list. The fundamentals for Gold Fields are fine, and it&#39;s in the process of gobbling up a smaller player to expand its global footprint. However, I needed to find a sector that could slide at the expense of a market rally, and tag, you&#39;re it, Gold Fields.</p><p>It&#39;s going to be a bumpy road for some of these investments. If you&#39;re looking for safe stocks, you aren&#39;t likely to find them in Apple, Conagra, and Gold Fields this week.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>3 Stocks to Avoid This Week</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n3 Stocks to Avoid This Week\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-10-04 23:16 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/10/02/3-stocks-to-avoid-this-week/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Investors can't seem to catch a break these days. The \"three stocks to avoid\" in my column last week that I thought were going to lose to the market -- Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Rite Aid, and ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/10/02/3-stocks-to-avoid-this-week/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"CAG":"康尼格拉","AAPL":"苹果","GFI":"金田"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/10/02/3-stocks-to-avoid-this-week/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2272199820","content_text":"Investors can't seem to catch a break these days. The \"three stocks to avoid\" in my column last week that I thought were going to lose to the market -- Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Rite Aid, and Lennar -- fell 6%, 29%, and 3%, respectively, averaging out to a 12.7% decline.The S&P 500 experienced a 2.9% move lower, so I was correct. I have been right in 32 of the past 50 weeks, or 64% of the time.Now let's look at the week ahead. I see Apple, Conagra Brands, and Gold Fields as stocks you might want to consider steering clear of this week. Let's go over my near-term concerns with all three investments.1. AppleThe country's most valuable company by market cap -- the only one currently perched above $2 trillion in value -- proved mortal last week. The consumer tech giant tumbled 8%, a big drop for a titan that was previously holding up well against the correcting market. Apple is finally trading closer to its 52-week low than its high.The new iPhone 14 may have generated some buzz when it was unveiled a few weeks ago, but consumers have tired of annual upgrade cycles for smartphones. The incremental improvements are nice, but they may not be enough to woo shoppers who are already clutching their savings harder than they have in a long time.There was a notable analyst downgrade last week. Wamsi Mohan at Bank of America thinks the global climate of inflation, rising interest rates, and geopolitical conflict will weigh on the previously waterproof Apple stock. As a company with heavy volume outside the U.S. market, it's worth noting that the strong dollar will eat into reported revenue from those overseas transactions. There was also a Bloomberg story reporting that Apple is asking suppliers to pare back iPhone 14 production in light of uninspiring global demand.Is Apple overvalued at 23 times trailing earnings? Apple is a company that seems to have one good fiscal year followed by two years of single-digit and sometimes even negative revenue growth. It could bounce back after last week's setback, but when I see all those wireless company ads pitching iPhones for practically nothing, I see a behemoth behind an aspirational brand that could be in trouble.2. Conagra BrandsInstinctively, you don't want to bet against Conagra Brands. It's the company that stocks supermarket shelves with Duncan Hines cake mix, Slim Jim jerky, and Hunt's ketchup. Even in a recession, we have to eat. The problem for a king of brands is that rising food prices are probably sending shoppers to lower-margin house brands. Why buy Conagra's Pam or Reddi-Wip when the store-brand version of the cooking spray or whipped cream is easier on the pocket?Conagra reports financial results for its fiscal first quarter on Thursday morning. Analysts aren't holding out for much, and it's not as if Conagra is an upbeat earnings surprise machine after beating Wall Street profit targets just once over the past three reports. The market sees Conagra growing its revenue by less than 5% this fiscal year, with earnings per share rising even less than that. Sales are expected to slow to just 1% growth next fiscal year. The 3.8% yield should provide some support, but it's not exactly the safe haven it plays itself out to be.3. Gold FieldsSeptember was brutal. It was the market's worst month since March 2020. It was also the worst September -- a month that has historically been challenging -- in 20 years. The bear market may not be over, but it wouldn't surprise me if there was at least a small bounce early in October. This call finds me eyeing Gold Fields.I'm not an expert on South African gold mining stocks, but I saw what happened last week. As most stocks tumbled, precious metals proved shiny. Half of the 10 largest stocks to gain at least 10% last week were gold miners, and Gold Fields commands the largest market of the five stocks on that list. The fundamentals for Gold Fields are fine, and it's in the process of gobbling up a smaller player to expand its global footprint. However, I needed to find a sector that could slide at the expense of a market rally, and tag, you're it, Gold Fields.It's going to be a bumpy road for some of these investments. If you're looking for safe stocks, you aren't likely to find them in Apple, Conagra, and Gold Fields this week.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":175,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9912381651,"gmtCreate":1664756774273,"gmtModify":1676537502562,"author":{"id":"3554886109685293","authorId":"3554886109685293","name":"Expert126","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2d4304f2ec7fabd9d599a3ba8b2a17e0","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3554886109685293","idStr":"3554886109685293"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9912381651","repostId":"2272080967","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2272080967","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1664754459,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2272080967?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-10-03 07:47","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Stock Had an Awful September, But the Quarter Wasn't Half-Bad","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2272080967","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"Apple stock has had a rough month, but there is more to the story -- overall the third quarter looke","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Apple stock has had a rough month, but there is more to the story -- overall the third quarter looked a lot better.</p><p>The last few weeks have been busy for <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">Apple</a>. On Sept. 7, the tech giant unveiled a handful of new products at its &#34;Far Out&#34; event, including new Apple Watches, AirPods, and of course, the heavily anticipated iPhone 14. Since the phones were available for preorder, analysts and investors have asked the same question: Is demand for the new iPhone strong?</p><p>This is a crucial question when it comes to Apple, as half of the company&#39;s revenue in the last quarter came from phone sales. Initial data showed that demand for the more expensive iPhone 14 Pro and Pro Max models was stronger than the base iPhone 14 and iPhone 14 Plus options. So strong, in fact, that one analyst told Barron&#39;s that there could be a supply issue for the holiday season.</p><p>But then earlier this week, more information about iPhone demand started to come in. One analyst from Jefferies noted that new data led him to believe that iPhone 14 demand wasn&#39;t as strong as expected in China. After that, Bloomberg reported that Apple reversed plans to boost iPhone 14 production later this year on demand weakness.</p><p>The stock has struggled since the news, falling 7.2% in the last three days, which have been the worst three-day stretch for the stock since June 13. And overall, the stock has done poorly in September. In fact, shares of Apple were down about 10% month-to-date, on pace for their worst month since February 2020 and worst September since 2008, according to Dow Jones Market Data.</p><p>Not only have reports about iPhone production and demand hurt the stock, but so has the broader economy.</p><p>The Federal Reserve has been hiking interest rates to battle historically high inflation, and while higher rates are usually not good for the stock market in general, growth stocks are particularly sensitive to higher rates as companies, like those in big tech, generate a lot of cash flow in the future. Higher interest rates mean future cash is less valuable than it was when rates were lower.</p><p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average is down 20% this year, the S&amp;P 500 has fallen 24%, and the Nasdaq Composite has dropped 32%. All are on pace to have their worst nine months of a calendar year since 2022. Apple is a component of all three major stock indexes, and has fallen 21% in 2022.</p><p>But not all news has been bad for the company. In the third quarter, Apple stock has climbed 3.1% and is on pace for its best quarterly performance since the fourth quarter of 2021.</p><p>Even though some analysts are uncertain about where the company stands in the midst of a potential consumer spending slowdown -- such as BofA Securities analyst Wamsi Mohan, who downgraded the stock to Neutral from Buy on Thursday -- others are bullish.</p><p>Rosenblatt Securities analyst Barton Crockett upgraded the stock to Buy from Neutral on Thursday and wrote in a research note that shoppers are more interested in Apple&#39;s higher-priced items. This has been a common theme among analysts tracking the company&#39;s sales.</p><p>&#34;Bloomberg&#39;s report [Wednesday] that Apple was walking back previous guidance to suppliers for a modest bump to second half of 2022 production back to an original target of flat should be read in the context of consumers&#39; clear preference for the pricier models with higher ASPs [average selling prices],&#34; Crockett said.</p><p>KeyBanc analyst Brandon Nispel, who rates Apple as Overweight, wrote that the news from Bloomberg was a negative for the day, but believes &#34;it is neutral to consensus expectations and [we] would take advantage by buying on the pullback.&#34;</p><p>Of the 41 analysts tracked by FactSet, 78% rate the stock as a Buy, 15% say it is a Hold and 7% rate it as a Sell.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Stock Had an Awful September, But the Quarter Wasn't Half-Bad</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Stock Had an Awful September, But the Quarter Wasn't Half-Bad\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-10-03 07:47</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>Apple stock has had a rough month, but there is more to the story -- overall the third quarter looked a lot better.</p><p>The last few weeks have been busy for <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">Apple</a>. On Sept. 7, the tech giant unveiled a handful of new products at its &#34;Far Out&#34; event, including new Apple Watches, AirPods, and of course, the heavily anticipated iPhone 14. Since the phones were available for preorder, analysts and investors have asked the same question: Is demand for the new iPhone strong?</p><p>This is a crucial question when it comes to Apple, as half of the company&#39;s revenue in the last quarter came from phone sales. Initial data showed that demand for the more expensive iPhone 14 Pro and Pro Max models was stronger than the base iPhone 14 and iPhone 14 Plus options. So strong, in fact, that one analyst told Barron&#39;s that there could be a supply issue for the holiday season.</p><p>But then earlier this week, more information about iPhone demand started to come in. One analyst from Jefferies noted that new data led him to believe that iPhone 14 demand wasn&#39;t as strong as expected in China. After that, Bloomberg reported that Apple reversed plans to boost iPhone 14 production later this year on demand weakness.</p><p>The stock has struggled since the news, falling 7.2% in the last three days, which have been the worst three-day stretch for the stock since June 13. And overall, the stock has done poorly in September. In fact, shares of Apple were down about 10% month-to-date, on pace for their worst month since February 2020 and worst September since 2008, according to Dow Jones Market Data.</p><p>Not only have reports about iPhone production and demand hurt the stock, but so has the broader economy.</p><p>The Federal Reserve has been hiking interest rates to battle historically high inflation, and while higher rates are usually not good for the stock market in general, growth stocks are particularly sensitive to higher rates as companies, like those in big tech, generate a lot of cash flow in the future. Higher interest rates mean future cash is less valuable than it was when rates were lower.</p><p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average is down 20% this year, the S&amp;P 500 has fallen 24%, and the Nasdaq Composite has dropped 32%. All are on pace to have their worst nine months of a calendar year since 2022. Apple is a component of all three major stock indexes, and has fallen 21% in 2022.</p><p>But not all news has been bad for the company. In the third quarter, Apple stock has climbed 3.1% and is on pace for its best quarterly performance since the fourth quarter of 2021.</p><p>Even though some analysts are uncertain about where the company stands in the midst of a potential consumer spending slowdown -- such as BofA Securities analyst Wamsi Mohan, who downgraded the stock to Neutral from Buy on Thursday -- others are bullish.</p><p>Rosenblatt Securities analyst Barton Crockett upgraded the stock to Buy from Neutral on Thursday and wrote in a research note that shoppers are more interested in Apple&#39;s higher-priced items. This has been a common theme among analysts tracking the company&#39;s sales.</p><p>&#34;Bloomberg&#39;s report [Wednesday] that Apple was walking back previous guidance to suppliers for a modest bump to second half of 2022 production back to an original target of flat should be read in the context of consumers&#39; clear preference for the pricier models with higher ASPs [average selling prices],&#34; Crockett said.</p><p>KeyBanc analyst Brandon Nispel, who rates Apple as Overweight, wrote that the news from Bloomberg was a negative for the day, but believes &#34;it is neutral to consensus expectations and [we] would take advantage by buying on the pullback.&#34;</p><p>Of the 41 analysts tracked by FactSet, 78% rate the stock as a Buy, 15% say it is a Hold and 7% rate it as a Sell.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2272080967","content_text":"Apple stock has had a rough month, but there is more to the story -- overall the third quarter looked a lot better.The last few weeks have been busy for Apple. On Sept. 7, the tech giant unveiled a handful of new products at its \"Far Out\" event, including new Apple Watches, AirPods, and of course, the heavily anticipated iPhone 14. Since the phones were available for preorder, analysts and investors have asked the same question: Is demand for the new iPhone strong?This is a crucial question when it comes to Apple, as half of the company's revenue in the last quarter came from phone sales. Initial data showed that demand for the more expensive iPhone 14 Pro and Pro Max models was stronger than the base iPhone 14 and iPhone 14 Plus options. So strong, in fact, that one analyst told Barron's that there could be a supply issue for the holiday season.But then earlier this week, more information about iPhone demand started to come in. One analyst from Jefferies noted that new data led him to believe that iPhone 14 demand wasn't as strong as expected in China. After that, Bloomberg reported that Apple reversed plans to boost iPhone 14 production later this year on demand weakness.The stock has struggled since the news, falling 7.2% in the last three days, which have been the worst three-day stretch for the stock since June 13. And overall, the stock has done poorly in September. In fact, shares of Apple were down about 10% month-to-date, on pace for their worst month since February 2020 and worst September since 2008, according to Dow Jones Market Data.Not only have reports about iPhone production and demand hurt the stock, but so has the broader economy.The Federal Reserve has been hiking interest rates to battle historically high inflation, and while higher rates are usually not good for the stock market in general, growth stocks are particularly sensitive to higher rates as companies, like those in big tech, generate a lot of cash flow in the future. Higher interest rates mean future cash is less valuable than it was when rates were lower.The Dow Jones Industrial Average is down 20% this year, the S&P 500 has fallen 24%, and the Nasdaq Composite has dropped 32%. All are on pace to have their worst nine months of a calendar year since 2022. Apple is a component of all three major stock indexes, and has fallen 21% in 2022.But not all news has been bad for the company. In the third quarter, Apple stock has climbed 3.1% and is on pace for its best quarterly performance since the fourth quarter of 2021.Even though some analysts are uncertain about where the company stands in the midst of a potential consumer spending slowdown -- such as BofA Securities analyst Wamsi Mohan, who downgraded the stock to Neutral from Buy on Thursday -- others are bullish.Rosenblatt Securities analyst Barton Crockett upgraded the stock to Buy from Neutral on Thursday and wrote in a research note that shoppers are more interested in Apple's higher-priced items. This has been a common theme among analysts tracking the company's sales.\"Bloomberg's report [Wednesday] that Apple was walking back previous guidance to suppliers for a modest bump to second half of 2022 production back to an original target of flat should be read in the context of consumers' clear preference for the pricier models with higher ASPs [average selling prices],\" Crockett said.KeyBanc analyst Brandon Nispel, who rates Apple as Overweight, wrote that the news from Bloomberg was a negative for the day, but believes \"it is neutral to consensus expectations and [we] would take advantage by buying on the pullback.\"Of the 41 analysts tracked by FactSet, 78% rate the stock as a Buy, 15% say it is a Hold and 7% rate it as a Sell.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":174,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9916561568,"gmtCreate":1664635056054,"gmtModify":1676537487469,"author":{"id":"3554886109685293","authorId":"3554886109685293","name":"Expert126","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2d4304f2ec7fabd9d599a3ba8b2a17e0","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3554886109685293","idStr":"3554886109685293"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Okok","listText":"Okok","text":"Okok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9916561568","repostId":"1167869076","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1167869076","pubTimestamp":1664595138,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1167869076?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-10-01 11:32","market":"us","language":"en","title":"2 REITs with the World’s Most Reliable Tenant","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1167869076","media":"TipRanks","summary":"Story HighlightsDEA and PSTL are two unique REITs, with their sole tenant being the U.S. government.","content":"<div>\n<p>Story HighlightsDEA and PSTL are two unique REITs, with their sole tenant being the U.S. government. Their cash flows should remain secured, backed by the full faith and credit of Uncle Sam. DEA’s and...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.tipranks.com/news/article/dea-pstl-reits-uncle-sam-always-pays-the-rent\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"lsy1606183248679","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>2 REITs with the World’s Most Reliable Tenant</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n2 REITs with the World’s Most Reliable Tenant\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-10-01 11:32 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.tipranks.com/news/article/dea-pstl-reits-uncle-sam-always-pays-the-rent><strong>TipRanks</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Story HighlightsDEA and PSTL are two unique REITs, with their sole tenant being the U.S. government. Their cash flows should remain secured, backed by the full faith and credit of Uncle Sam. DEA’s and...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.tipranks.com/news/article/dea-pstl-reits-uncle-sam-always-pays-the-rent\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"DEA":"Easterly Government Properties Inc","PSTL":"Postal Realty Trust, Inc."},"source_url":"https://www.tipranks.com/news/article/dea-pstl-reits-uncle-sam-always-pays-the-rent","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1167869076","content_text":"Story HighlightsDEA and PSTL are two unique REITs, with their sole tenant being the U.S. government. Their cash flows should remain secured, backed by the full faith and credit of Uncle Sam. DEA’s and PSTL’s dividend yields are quite juicy, while both stocks trade at rather reasonable valuations as well.While researching various office and industrial REITs lately, I came across two relatively unknown names whose qualities should shield them from the ongoing concerns surrounding the office and industrial property markets. Easterly Government Properties (NYSE: DEA) and Postal Realty Trust (NYSE: PSTL) have managed to avoid many of the underlying challenges impacting their industries by catering to the world’s most reliable tenant: The United States Government.Due to this remarkable quality, their high dividend yields, and reasonable valuations, I am bullish on both names.Other kinds of REITs often present more risk. Undoubtedly, commercial real estate was changed forever two years ago, as the COVID-19 pandemic disrupted the market dynamics massively. While the pandemic has largely faded, commercial real estate properties have failed to recover meaningfully, as demand for such spaces remains rather soft.Sure, most companies do utilize office space, but following the pandemic, hybrid working (i.e., working from home and from the office) seems to have prevailed. Industrial properties were proven more resilient during the pandemic, but with rates on the rise and the economy slowing down, their future also appears somewhat bleak.Therefore, DEA and PSTL are interesting REITs due to their well-known, high-quality tenant.What Do DEA and PSTL Do?To be more specific about DEA’s and PSTL’s unique advantages in the current environment, let’s quickly break down their operations.DEA provides office space for several mission-critical U.S. Federal Agencies. As of its latest filings, the company wholly owned 87 operating properties in the United States and has another six as part of a joint venture. 92 of these are operating properties that are leased primarily to U.S. Government tenant agencies.With 99% of its properties leased, the company enjoys robust lease income backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government. This is also the case with PSTL, as its properties exclusively serve the USPS.Why is Uncle Sam Such a Great Tenant?Having the U.S. government as your exclusive tenant comes with grand advantages that can form a stronghold moat. The greatest advantage, and what separates DEA and PSTL from ordinary REITs, is the unparalleled credit of Uncle Sam. Essentially, the U.S. government is universally agreed to be the most trustworthy creditor in the world (i.e., the institution that has the lowest chances among any other institution globally to fail.)It is quite safe to say that Uncle Sam has his rental payments entirely covered – especially when the tenants include mission-critical properties that house crucial agencies like the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services (USCIS), the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), the Defense Health Agency (DHA), and the USPS.After all, the government can always print money to satisfy its obligations. Hence these two REITs face no counterparty risk or rent collection issues. This is a massive advantage these days, as “ordinary” REITs do experience these challenges.Further, no matter the underlying conditions, these agencies will “never” cease to exist due to being essential assets for vital government operations and national security. If this doesn’t convince of how high the quality of DEA’s cash flows and lease agreements are, the REIT has preserved a 100% occupancy ratio since its public listing.This is likely to remain the case for decades to come, as its weighted average lease term stands at a lengthy 19.6 years. Combined with the critical nature of the company’s tenants and the fact that they can’t just simply relocate (these properties are purpose-built for each agency’s needs), investors enjoy an unparalleled margin of safety.When it comes to PSTL, its occupancy stands at 99.7%. While its weighted average lease term stands at around four years (yes, postal offices are not as critical as agency centers), cash flows should be quite secured over the medium term. If anything, I would argue that PSTL even has an advantage here, as it can renegotiate leases at higher rates sooner.Is DEA Stock a Buy, According to Analysts?Turning to Wall Street, Easterly Government Properties has a Hold consensus rating based on one buy and four Holds assigned in the past three months. At $21.20, the average DEA stock forecast suggests around 34.5% upside potential.Interestingly, DEA stock only has a5 out of 10 Smart Score rating, implying that it will perform in line with the market, going forward – according to this metric, at least.Is PSTL Stock a Buy, According to Analysts?Turning to Wall Street, Postal Realty has a Moderate Buy consensus rating based on two buys and one Hold assigned in the past three months. At $18.00, the average PSTL stock forecast suggests around 21.13% upside potential.Unlike DEA, PSTL stock has an8 out of 10 Smart Score rating, suggesting that it can outperform the market, going forward.Conclusion: Safety Without OverpayingDEA and PSTL are rather unique, with all of their cash flow essentially guaranteed by the government under multi-year leases. Accordingly, their risk profiles are certainly reduced compared to ordinary REITs, and their respective yields of roughly 6.4% and 6.3% can be relied upon. Considering their unique qualities and high dividend yields, it’s quite surprising to see that both names trade at rather reasonable valuations.DEA and PSTL trade at around 11.5x and 16.2x their projected FFOs for the year. PSTL’s multiple is higher due to the likelihood of renegotiating leases sooner compared to DEA amid earlier expirations.Regardless, both names should be proven fruitful investments and eventually attract increased investor attention due to their exceptional positioning in such an uncertain environment.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":238,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9916089248,"gmtCreate":1664488609585,"gmtModify":1676537462420,"author":{"id":"3554886109685293","authorId":"3554886109685293","name":"Expert126","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2d4304f2ec7fabd9d599a3ba8b2a17e0","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3554886109685293","idStr":"3554886109685293"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Maf","listText":"Maf","text":"Maf","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9916089248","repostId":"1178201589","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":70,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9918258366,"gmtCreate":1664409353155,"gmtModify":1676537448096,"author":{"id":"3554886109685293","authorId":"3554886109685293","name":"Expert126","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2d4304f2ec7fabd9d599a3ba8b2a17e0","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3554886109685293","idStr":"3554886109685293"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Okok","listText":"Okok","text":"Okok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9918258366","repostId":"2271737074","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2271737074","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1664406595,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2271737074?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-09-29 07:09","market":"us","language":"en","title":"US STOCKS-Wall Street Ends Sharply Higher as Treasury Yields Dip","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2271737074","media":"Reuters","summary":"Apple drops on concerns about iPhone demandTreasury prices rebound after BoE decisionS&P 500 records largest one-day gain since Aug. 10Indexes: Dow +1.88%, S&P 500 +1.97%, Nasdaq +2.05%Sept 28 (Reuter","content":"<html><head></head><body><ul><li>Apple drops on concerns about iPhone demand</li><li>Treasury prices rebound after BoE decision</li><li>S&amp;P 500 records largest one-day gain since Aug. 10</li><li>Indexes: Dow +1.88%, S&amp;P 500 +1.97%, Nasdaq +2.05%</li></ul><p>Sept 28 (Reuters) - Wall Street ended sharply higher on Wednesday following its recent sell-off, helped by falling Treasury yields, while Apple dropped on concerns about demand for iPhones.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 recorded its first gain in seven sessions after closing on Tuesday at its lowest since late 2020.</p><p>Interest rate-sensitive megacaps Microsoft, Amazon and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/META\">Meta Platforms</a> rallied as the yield on 10-year Treasury notes fell over 0.26 percentage point in its biggest one-day drop since 2009.</p><p>Pushing yields lower on Treasuries with maturities six months and longer, the Bank of England said it would buy long-dated British bonds in a move aimed at restoring financial stability in markets rocked globally by the fiscal policy of the new government in London.</p><p>&#34;The yield on the two-year Treasury has gone up persistently over the course of the last several weeks, and for the first time we&#39;ve seen it go down for two days in a row, and that has given equities a breather,&#34; said Art Hogan, chief market strategist at B. Riley Wealth.</p><p>Investors have been keenly listening to comments from Federal Reserve officials about the path of monetary policy, with Atlanta Fed President Raphael Bostic on Wednesday backing another 75-basis-point interest rate hike in November. The Fed will likely get borrowing costs to where they need to be by early next year, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago President Charles Evans said.</p><p>U.S. stocks have been battered in 2022 by worries that an aggressive push by the Fed to raise borrowing costs could throw the economy into a downturn.</p><p>Apple Inc dropped 1.3% after Bloomberg reported the company is dropping plans to increase production of its new iPhones this year after an anticipated surge in demand failed to materialize.</p><p>Apple has been a relative outperformer in 2022&#39;s stock market sell-off, down about 15% in the year to date, versus the S&amp;P 500&#39;s 22% loss.</p><p>All of the 11 S&amp;P 500 sector indexes rose, led by a 4.4% jump in energy and a 3.2% leap in communication services .</p><p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 1.88% to end at 29,683.74 points, while the S&amp;P 500 gained 1.97% to 3,719.04. It was the S&amp;P 500&#39;s largest one-day gain since Aug. 10.</p><p>The Nasdaq Composite jumped 2.05% to 11,051.64.</p><p>Biogen Inc surged 40% after saying its experimental Alzheimer&#39;s drug, developed with Japanese partner Eisai Co Ltd , succeeded in slowing cognitive decline.</p><p>Eli Lilly &amp; Co, which is also developing an Alzheimer&#39;s drug, jumped 7.5%, and it was among the biggest boosts to the S&amp;P 500 index.</p><p>Advancing issues outnumbered declining ones on the NYSE by a 5.82-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 3.66-to-1 ratio favored advancers.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 posted one new 52-week high and 30 new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 26 new highs and 224 new lows.</p><p>Volume on U.S. exchanges was 11.7 billion shares, compared with an 11.4 billion average for the full session over the last 20 trading days.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/da8e9a6ce881361e45c74a1b02609eaf\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"1920\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>US STOCKS-Wall Street Ends Sharply Higher as Treasury Yields Dip</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nUS STOCKS-Wall Street Ends Sharply Higher as Treasury Yields Dip\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-09-29 07:09</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><ul><li>Apple drops on concerns about iPhone demand</li><li>Treasury prices rebound after BoE decision</li><li>S&amp;P 500 records largest one-day gain since Aug. 10</li><li>Indexes: Dow +1.88%, S&amp;P 500 +1.97%, Nasdaq +2.05%</li></ul><p>Sept 28 (Reuters) - Wall Street ended sharply higher on Wednesday following its recent sell-off, helped by falling Treasury yields, while Apple dropped on concerns about demand for iPhones.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 recorded its first gain in seven sessions after closing on Tuesday at its lowest since late 2020.</p><p>Interest rate-sensitive megacaps Microsoft, Amazon and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/META\">Meta Platforms</a> rallied as the yield on 10-year Treasury notes fell over 0.26 percentage point in its biggest one-day drop since 2009.</p><p>Pushing yields lower on Treasuries with maturities six months and longer, the Bank of England said it would buy long-dated British bonds in a move aimed at restoring financial stability in markets rocked globally by the fiscal policy of the new government in London.</p><p>&#34;The yield on the two-year Treasury has gone up persistently over the course of the last several weeks, and for the first time we&#39;ve seen it go down for two days in a row, and that has given equities a breather,&#34; said Art Hogan, chief market strategist at B. Riley Wealth.</p><p>Investors have been keenly listening to comments from Federal Reserve officials about the path of monetary policy, with Atlanta Fed President Raphael Bostic on Wednesday backing another 75-basis-point interest rate hike in November. The Fed will likely get borrowing costs to where they need to be by early next year, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago President Charles Evans said.</p><p>U.S. stocks have been battered in 2022 by worries that an aggressive push by the Fed to raise borrowing costs could throw the economy into a downturn.</p><p>Apple Inc dropped 1.3% after Bloomberg reported the company is dropping plans to increase production of its new iPhones this year after an anticipated surge in demand failed to materialize.</p><p>Apple has been a relative outperformer in 2022&#39;s stock market sell-off, down about 15% in the year to date, versus the S&amp;P 500&#39;s 22% loss.</p><p>All of the 11 S&amp;P 500 sector indexes rose, led by a 4.4% jump in energy and a 3.2% leap in communication services .</p><p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 1.88% to end at 29,683.74 points, while the S&amp;P 500 gained 1.97% to 3,719.04. It was the S&amp;P 500&#39;s largest one-day gain since Aug. 10.</p><p>The Nasdaq Composite jumped 2.05% to 11,051.64.</p><p>Biogen Inc surged 40% after saying its experimental Alzheimer&#39;s drug, developed with Japanese partner Eisai Co Ltd , succeeded in slowing cognitive decline.</p><p>Eli Lilly &amp; Co, which is also developing an Alzheimer&#39;s drug, jumped 7.5%, and it was among the biggest boosts to the S&amp;P 500 index.</p><p>Advancing issues outnumbered declining ones on the NYSE by a 5.82-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 3.66-to-1 ratio favored advancers.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 posted one new 52-week high and 30 new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 26 new highs and 224 new lows.</p><p>Volume on U.S. exchanges was 11.7 billion shares, compared with an 11.4 billion average for the full session over the last 20 trading days.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/da8e9a6ce881361e45c74a1b02609eaf\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"1920\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2271737074","content_text":"Apple drops on concerns about iPhone demandTreasury prices rebound after BoE decisionS&P 500 records largest one-day gain since Aug. 10Indexes: Dow +1.88%, S&P 500 +1.97%, Nasdaq +2.05%Sept 28 (Reuters) - Wall Street ended sharply higher on Wednesday following its recent sell-off, helped by falling Treasury yields, while Apple dropped on concerns about demand for iPhones.The S&P 500 recorded its first gain in seven sessions after closing on Tuesday at its lowest since late 2020.Interest rate-sensitive megacaps Microsoft, Amazon and Meta Platforms rallied as the yield on 10-year Treasury notes fell over 0.26 percentage point in its biggest one-day drop since 2009.Pushing yields lower on Treasuries with maturities six months and longer, the Bank of England said it would buy long-dated British bonds in a move aimed at restoring financial stability in markets rocked globally by the fiscal policy of the new government in London.\"The yield on the two-year Treasury has gone up persistently over the course of the last several weeks, and for the first time we've seen it go down for two days in a row, and that has given equities a breather,\" said Art Hogan, chief market strategist at B. Riley Wealth.Investors have been keenly listening to comments from Federal Reserve officials about the path of monetary policy, with Atlanta Fed President Raphael Bostic on Wednesday backing another 75-basis-point interest rate hike in November. The Fed will likely get borrowing costs to where they need to be by early next year, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago President Charles Evans said.U.S. stocks have been battered in 2022 by worries that an aggressive push by the Fed to raise borrowing costs could throw the economy into a downturn.Apple Inc dropped 1.3% after Bloomberg reported the company is dropping plans to increase production of its new iPhones this year after an anticipated surge in demand failed to materialize.Apple has been a relative outperformer in 2022's stock market sell-off, down about 15% in the year to date, versus the S&P 500's 22% loss.All of the 11 S&P 500 sector indexes rose, led by a 4.4% jump in energy and a 3.2% leap in communication services .The Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 1.88% to end at 29,683.74 points, while the S&P 500 gained 1.97% to 3,719.04. It was the S&P 500's largest one-day gain since Aug. 10.The Nasdaq Composite jumped 2.05% to 11,051.64.Biogen Inc surged 40% after saying its experimental Alzheimer's drug, developed with Japanese partner Eisai Co Ltd , succeeded in slowing cognitive decline.Eli Lilly & Co, which is also developing an Alzheimer's drug, jumped 7.5%, and it was among the biggest boosts to the S&P 500 index.Advancing issues outnumbered declining ones on the NYSE by a 5.82-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 3.66-to-1 ratio favored advancers.The S&P 500 posted one new 52-week high and 30 new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 26 new highs and 224 new lows.Volume on U.S. exchanges was 11.7 billion shares, compared with an 11.4 billion average for the full session over the last 20 trading days.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":166,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9918911481,"gmtCreate":1664314957644,"gmtModify":1676537428872,"author":{"id":"3554886109685293","authorId":"3554886109685293","name":"Expert126","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2d4304f2ec7fabd9d599a3ba8b2a17e0","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3554886109685293","idStr":"3554886109685293"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Okoo","listText":"Okoo","text":"Okoo","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9918911481","repostId":"1112721039","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1112721039","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1664290033,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1112721039?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-09-27 22:47","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Oil Stocks Gained in Morning Trading","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1112721039","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Oil Stocks Gained in Morning Trading.Exxon Mobil, Chevron, BP, ConocoPhillips, Schlumberger, Hallibu","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Oil Stocks Gained in Morning Trading.</p><p>Exxon Mobil, Chevron, BP, ConocoPhillips, Schlumberger, Halliburton, Occidental and Callon rose between 1% and 4%.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8ca7fa1d384a412dea8b3ee1d468ffac\" tg-width=\"493\" tg-height=\"722\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Oil Stocks Gained in Morning Trading</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nOil Stocks Gained in Morning Trading\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-09-27 22:47</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>Oil Stocks Gained in Morning Trading.</p><p>Exxon Mobil, Chevron, BP, ConocoPhillips, Schlumberger, Halliburton, Occidental and Callon rose between 1% and 4%.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8ca7fa1d384a412dea8b3ee1d468ffac\" tg-width=\"493\" tg-height=\"722\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SLB":"斯伦贝谢","HAL":"哈里伯顿"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1112721039","content_text":"Oil Stocks Gained in Morning Trading.Exxon Mobil, Chevron, BP, ConocoPhillips, Schlumberger, Halliburton, Occidental and Callon rose between 1% and 4%.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":113,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9918911256,"gmtCreate":1664314870175,"gmtModify":1676537428871,"author":{"id":"3554886109685293","authorId":"3554886109685293","name":"Expert126","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2d4304f2ec7fabd9d599a3ba8b2a17e0","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3554886109685293","idStr":"3554886109685293"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9918911256","repostId":"2270587233","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2270587233","pubTimestamp":1664291828,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2270587233?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-09-27 23:17","market":"us","language":"en","title":"2 Top Index Funds That Could Make Retirees Richer Over the Next Decade","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2270587233","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Warren Buffett has often said low-cost index funds are the best option for most investors.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Generally speaking, retirees should err on the side of caution when managing their money. That means a good portion of their net worth should be allocated to low-risk assets like bonds and cash, while a smaller portion should be invested in stocks. That said, buying individual stocks may be too risky or require too much research for some retirees.</p><p>Fortunately, there is another option. Index funds are a great way to gain exposure to the stock market while minimizing the risk and work involved. In fact, Warren Buffett once told Vanguard founder Jack Bogle that index funds are &#34;the most sensible equity investment for the great majority of investors.&#34;</p><p>With that in mind, these index funds could make retirees richer over the next decade.</p><h2>1. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/VOO\">Vanguard S&amp;P 500 ETF</a></h2><p>The <b>Vanguard S&amp;P 500 ETF</b> (VOO) tracks the <b>S&amp;P 500</b>, an index containing 500 of the largest U.S. companies that covers approximately 80% of the market capitalization of all publicly traded companies in the U.S. To that end, the S&amp;P 500 is often viewed as a benchmark for the entire U.S. stock market.</p><p><b>Sector breakdown:</b> The S&amp;P 500 includes companies from all 11 market sectors, though five sectors account for 72% of its total weight: Information technology (27.3%), healthcare (14.1%), consumer discretionary (11.4%), financials (10.9%), and communications services (8.4%). Its three largest holdings are <b>Apple</b>, <b>Microsoft</b>, and <b>Amazon</b>.</p><p><b>Past performance:</b> The Vanguard S&amp;P 500 ETF has generated a total return of nearly 220% over the last decade, which is equivalent to an annualized return of 12.3%. At that pace, an initial investment of $10,000 would grow into $31,900 over the next decade.</p><p>Beyond its broad scope, the Vanguard S&amp;P 500 ETF is a particularly compelling investment for two other reasons. First, the S&amp;P 500 has recovered from every past downturn, and the index generated a positive return 94.1% of the time over all 10-year periods between 1926 and 2017. Second, it bears an expense ratio of just 0.03%, meaning investors would pay $3 per year on a $10,000 portfolio.</p><h2>2. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/VIG\">Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF</a></h2><p>The <b>Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF</b> (VIG) is designed to track the <b>S&amp;P U.S. Dividend Growers Index</b>, which includes 289 U.S. companies that have increased their dividend payments each year for at least 10 consecutive years.</p><p><b>Sector breakdown:</b> The S&amp;P U.S. Dividend Growers Index includes companies from 10 of the 11 market sectors (real estate is the one exclusion), and the top five sectors account for 80% of its total weight: Information technology (23.4%), healthcare (15.6%), financials (14.7%), consumer staples (13.6%), and industrials (13.3%). Its three largest holdings are <b>UnitedHealth Group</b>, Microsoft, and <b>Johnson &amp; Johnson</b>.</p><p><b>Past performance:</b> The Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF has generated a total return of nearly 193% over the last decade, which is equivalent to an annualized return of 11.3%. At that pace, an initial investment of $10,000 would grow into $29,100 over the next decade.</p><p>Beyond its broad scope, the Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF is a compelling investment for two other reasons. First, companies that consistently generate enough cash to raise their dividend tend to have strong fundamentals, and that often coincides with share price stability during periods of market volatility. In fact, the Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF is down only 5.6% over the past year, while the broader S&amp;P 500 has fallen 10.1%. Second, the ETF bears an expense ratio of 0.06%, meaning investors would pay just $6 per year on a $10,000 portfolio.</p><p>As a final thought, retirees should keep at least two years&#39; worth of cash on hand to cover living expenses, though some experts recommend a five-year cash cushion. Additionally, any money retirees will need in the next decade should not be invested in the stock market.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>2 Top Index Funds That Could Make Retirees Richer Over the Next Decade</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n2 Top Index Funds That Could Make Retirees Richer Over the Next Decade\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-09-27 23:17 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/09/26/2-top-index-funds-could-make-retirees-richer/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Generally speaking, retirees should err on the side of caution when managing their money. That means a good portion of their net worth should be allocated to low-risk assets like bonds and cash, while...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/09/26/2-top-index-funds-could-make-retirees-richer/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"VOO":"Vanguard标普500ETF","VIG":"股利增长指数ETF-Vanguard"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/09/26/2-top-index-funds-could-make-retirees-richer/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2270587233","content_text":"Generally speaking, retirees should err on the side of caution when managing their money. That means a good portion of their net worth should be allocated to low-risk assets like bonds and cash, while a smaller portion should be invested in stocks. That said, buying individual stocks may be too risky or require too much research for some retirees.Fortunately, there is another option. Index funds are a great way to gain exposure to the stock market while minimizing the risk and work involved. In fact, Warren Buffett once told Vanguard founder Jack Bogle that index funds are \"the most sensible equity investment for the great majority of investors.\"With that in mind, these index funds could make retirees richer over the next decade.1. Vanguard S&P 500 ETFThe Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) tracks the S&P 500, an index containing 500 of the largest U.S. companies that covers approximately 80% of the market capitalization of all publicly traded companies in the U.S. To that end, the S&P 500 is often viewed as a benchmark for the entire U.S. stock market.Sector breakdown: The S&P 500 includes companies from all 11 market sectors, though five sectors account for 72% of its total weight: Information technology (27.3%), healthcare (14.1%), consumer discretionary (11.4%), financials (10.9%), and communications services (8.4%). Its three largest holdings are Apple, Microsoft, and Amazon.Past performance: The Vanguard S&P 500 ETF has generated a total return of nearly 220% over the last decade, which is equivalent to an annualized return of 12.3%. At that pace, an initial investment of $10,000 would grow into $31,900 over the next decade.Beyond its broad scope, the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF is a particularly compelling investment for two other reasons. First, the S&P 500 has recovered from every past downturn, and the index generated a positive return 94.1% of the time over all 10-year periods between 1926 and 2017. Second, it bears an expense ratio of just 0.03%, meaning investors would pay $3 per year on a $10,000 portfolio.2. Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETFThe Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) is designed to track the S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index, which includes 289 U.S. companies that have increased their dividend payments each year for at least 10 consecutive years.Sector breakdown: The S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index includes companies from 10 of the 11 market sectors (real estate is the one exclusion), and the top five sectors account for 80% of its total weight: Information technology (23.4%), healthcare (15.6%), financials (14.7%), consumer staples (13.6%), and industrials (13.3%). Its three largest holdings are UnitedHealth Group, Microsoft, and Johnson & Johnson.Past performance: The Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF has generated a total return of nearly 193% over the last decade, which is equivalent to an annualized return of 11.3%. At that pace, an initial investment of $10,000 would grow into $29,100 over the next decade.Beyond its broad scope, the Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF is a compelling investment for two other reasons. First, companies that consistently generate enough cash to raise their dividend tend to have strong fundamentals, and that often coincides with share price stability during periods of market volatility. In fact, the Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF is down only 5.6% over the past year, while the broader S&P 500 has fallen 10.1%. Second, the ETF bears an expense ratio of 0.06%, meaning investors would pay just $6 per year on a $10,000 portfolio.As a final thought, retirees should keep at least two years' worth of cash on hand to cover living expenses, though some experts recommend a five-year cash cushion. Additionally, any money retirees will need in the next decade should not be invested in the stock market.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":138,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9911481674,"gmtCreate":1664243535498,"gmtModify":1676537417046,"author":{"id":"3554886109685293","authorId":"3554886109685293","name":"Expert126","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2d4304f2ec7fabd9d599a3ba8b2a17e0","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3554886109685293","idStr":"3554886109685293"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Okok","listText":"Okok","text":"Okok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9911481674","repostId":"2270268923","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2270268923","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1664233294,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2270268923?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-09-27 07:01","market":"us","language":"en","title":"US STOCKS-Wall Street Ends Lower, Dow Confirms Bear Market","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2270268923","media":"Reuters","summary":"Fed rate hikes have investors 'throwing in the towel'Casinos jump as Macau allows tour groups after nearly 3 yearsIndexes: Dow -1.11%, S&P 500 -1.03%, Nasdaq -0.60%Sept 26  - Wall Street slid deeper into a bear market on Monday, with the S&P 500 and Dow closing lower as investors fretted that the Federal Reserve's aggressive campaign against inflation could throw the U.S. economy into a sharp downturn.After two weeks of mostly steady losses on the U.S. stock market, the Dow Jones Industrial Aver","content":"<html><head></head><body><ul><li>Fed rate hikes have investors &#39;throwing in the towel&#39;</li><li>Casinos jump as Macau allows tour groups after nearly 3 years</li><li>Indexes: Dow -1.11%, S&amp;P 500 -1.03%, Nasdaq -0.60%</li></ul><p>Sept 26 (Reuters) - Wall Street slid deeper into a bear market on Monday, with the S&amp;P 500 and Dow closing lower as investors fretted that the Federal Reserve&#39;s aggressive campaign against inflation could throw the U.S. economy into a sharp downturn.</p><p>After two weeks of mostly steady losses on the U.S. stock market, the Dow Jones Industrial Average confirmed it has been in a bear market since early January. The S&amp;P 500 index confirmed in June it was in a bear market, and on Monday it ended the session below its mid-June closing low, extending this year&#39;s overall selloff.</p><p>With the Fed signaling last Wednesday that high interest rates could last through 2023, the S&amp;P 500 has relinquished the last of its gains made in a summer rally.</p><p>&#34;Investors are just throwing in the towel,&#34; said Jake Dollarhide, Chief Executive Officer of Longbow Asset Management in Tulsa, Oklahoma. &#34;It&#39;s the uncertainty about the high-water mark for the Fed funds rate. Is it 4.6%, is it 5%? Is it sometime in 2023?&#34;</p><p>Confidence among stock traders was also shaken by dramatic moves in the global foreign exchange market as sterling hit an all-time low on worries that the new British government&#39;s fiscal plan released Friday threatened to stretch the country&#39;s finances.</p><p>That added an extra layer of volatility to markets, where investors are worried about a global recession amid decades-high inflation. The CBOE Volatility index, hovered near three-month highs.</p><p>The Dow is now down 20.5% from its record high close on Jan. 4. According to a widely used definition, ending the session down 20% or more from its record high close confirms the Dow has been in a bear market since hitting its January peak.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 has yet to drop below its intra-day low on June 17. It is down about 23% so far in 2022.</p><p>In Monday&#39;s session, the Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 1.11% to end at 29,260.81 points, while the S&amp;P 500 lost 1.03% to 3,655.04.</p><p>The Nasdaq Composite dropped 0.6% to 10,802.92.</p><p>Ten of 11 S&amp;P 500s sector indexes fell, led by 2.6% drops in real estate and energy.</p><p>Gains in Amazon and Costco Wholesale Corp helped limit losses in the Nasdaq.</p><p>Shares of casino operators Wynn Resorts, Las Vegas Sands Corp and Melco Resorts &amp; Entertainment jumped between 11.8% and 25.5% after Macau planned to open to mainland Chinese tour groups in November for the first time in almost three years.</p><p>Volume on U.S. exchanges was 11.9 billion shares, compared with the 11.2 billion average for the full session over the last 20 trading days.</p><p>Declining issues outnumbered advancing ones on the NYSE by a 5.37-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 2.31-to-1 ratio favored decliners.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 posted no new 52-week highs and 120 new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 16 new highs and 594 new lows.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>US STOCKS-Wall Street Ends Lower, Dow Confirms Bear Market</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nUS STOCKS-Wall Street Ends Lower, Dow Confirms Bear Market\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-09-27 07:01</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><ul><li>Fed rate hikes have investors &#39;throwing in the towel&#39;</li><li>Casinos jump as Macau allows tour groups after nearly 3 years</li><li>Indexes: Dow -1.11%, S&amp;P 500 -1.03%, Nasdaq -0.60%</li></ul><p>Sept 26 (Reuters) - Wall Street slid deeper into a bear market on Monday, with the S&amp;P 500 and Dow closing lower as investors fretted that the Federal Reserve&#39;s aggressive campaign against inflation could throw the U.S. economy into a sharp downturn.</p><p>After two weeks of mostly steady losses on the U.S. stock market, the Dow Jones Industrial Average confirmed it has been in a bear market since early January. The S&amp;P 500 index confirmed in June it was in a bear market, and on Monday it ended the session below its mid-June closing low, extending this year&#39;s overall selloff.</p><p>With the Fed signaling last Wednesday that high interest rates could last through 2023, the S&amp;P 500 has relinquished the last of its gains made in a summer rally.</p><p>&#34;Investors are just throwing in the towel,&#34; said Jake Dollarhide, Chief Executive Officer of Longbow Asset Management in Tulsa, Oklahoma. &#34;It&#39;s the uncertainty about the high-water mark for the Fed funds rate. Is it 4.6%, is it 5%? Is it sometime in 2023?&#34;</p><p>Confidence among stock traders was also shaken by dramatic moves in the global foreign exchange market as sterling hit an all-time low on worries that the new British government&#39;s fiscal plan released Friday threatened to stretch the country&#39;s finances.</p><p>That added an extra layer of volatility to markets, where investors are worried about a global recession amid decades-high inflation. The CBOE Volatility index, hovered near three-month highs.</p><p>The Dow is now down 20.5% from its record high close on Jan. 4. According to a widely used definition, ending the session down 20% or more from its record high close confirms the Dow has been in a bear market since hitting its January peak.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 has yet to drop below its intra-day low on June 17. It is down about 23% so far in 2022.</p><p>In Monday&#39;s session, the Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 1.11% to end at 29,260.81 points, while the S&amp;P 500 lost 1.03% to 3,655.04.</p><p>The Nasdaq Composite dropped 0.6% to 10,802.92.</p><p>Ten of 11 S&amp;P 500s sector indexes fell, led by 2.6% drops in real estate and energy.</p><p>Gains in Amazon and Costco Wholesale Corp helped limit losses in the Nasdaq.</p><p>Shares of casino operators Wynn Resorts, Las Vegas Sands Corp and Melco Resorts &amp; Entertainment jumped between 11.8% and 25.5% after Macau planned to open to mainland Chinese tour groups in November for the first time in almost three years.</p><p>Volume on U.S. exchanges was 11.9 billion shares, compared with the 11.2 billion average for the full session over the last 20 trading days.</p><p>Declining issues outnumbered advancing ones on the NYSE by a 5.37-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 2.31-to-1 ratio favored decliners.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 posted no new 52-week highs and 120 new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 16 new highs and 594 new lows.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2270268923","content_text":"Fed rate hikes have investors 'throwing in the towel'Casinos jump as Macau allows tour groups after nearly 3 yearsIndexes: Dow -1.11%, S&P 500 -1.03%, Nasdaq -0.60%Sept 26 (Reuters) - Wall Street slid deeper into a bear market on Monday, with the S&P 500 and Dow closing lower as investors fretted that the Federal Reserve's aggressive campaign against inflation could throw the U.S. economy into a sharp downturn.After two weeks of mostly steady losses on the U.S. stock market, the Dow Jones Industrial Average confirmed it has been in a bear market since early January. The S&P 500 index confirmed in June it was in a bear market, and on Monday it ended the session below its mid-June closing low, extending this year's overall selloff.With the Fed signaling last Wednesday that high interest rates could last through 2023, the S&P 500 has relinquished the last of its gains made in a summer rally.\"Investors are just throwing in the towel,\" said Jake Dollarhide, Chief Executive Officer of Longbow Asset Management in Tulsa, Oklahoma. \"It's the uncertainty about the high-water mark for the Fed funds rate. Is it 4.6%, is it 5%? Is it sometime in 2023?\"Confidence among stock traders was also shaken by dramatic moves in the global foreign exchange market as sterling hit an all-time low on worries that the new British government's fiscal plan released Friday threatened to stretch the country's finances.That added an extra layer of volatility to markets, where investors are worried about a global recession amid decades-high inflation. The CBOE Volatility index, hovered near three-month highs.The Dow is now down 20.5% from its record high close on Jan. 4. According to a widely used definition, ending the session down 20% or more from its record high close confirms the Dow has been in a bear market since hitting its January peak.The S&P 500 has yet to drop below its intra-day low on June 17. It is down about 23% so far in 2022.In Monday's session, the Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 1.11% to end at 29,260.81 points, while the S&P 500 lost 1.03% to 3,655.04.The Nasdaq Composite dropped 0.6% to 10,802.92.Ten of 11 S&P 500s sector indexes fell, led by 2.6% drops in real estate and energy.Gains in Amazon and Costco Wholesale Corp helped limit losses in the Nasdaq.Shares of casino operators Wynn Resorts, Las Vegas Sands Corp and Melco Resorts & Entertainment jumped between 11.8% and 25.5% after Macau planned to open to mainland Chinese tour groups in November for the first time in almost three years.Volume on U.S. exchanges was 11.9 billion shares, compared with the 11.2 billion average for the full session over the last 20 trading days.Declining issues outnumbered advancing ones on the NYSE by a 5.37-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 2.31-to-1 ratio favored decliners.The S&P 500 posted no new 52-week highs and 120 new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 16 new highs and 594 new lows.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":146,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9913226821,"gmtCreate":1663994252464,"gmtModify":1676537377448,"author":{"id":"3554886109685293","authorId":"3554886109685293","name":"Expert126","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2d4304f2ec7fabd9d599a3ba8b2a17e0","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3554886109685293","idStr":"3554886109685293"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Okok","listText":"Okok","text":"Okok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9913226821","repostId":"1191965677","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1191965677","pubTimestamp":1663982011,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1191965677?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-09-24 09:13","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why Are Oil Stocks XOM, OXY, DVN Down Friday?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1191965677","media":"InvestorPlace","summary":"There are three main reasons to answer the question: \"Why are oil stocks down today?\"Oil is under pr","content":"<html><head></head><body><ul><li>There are three main reasons to answer the question: &#34;Why are oil stocks down today?&#34;</li><li>Oil is under pressure due to global recession fears and a rising U.S. dollar -- both of which are bad for energy stocks.</li><li>Lastly, the S&amp;P 500 is under significant pressure on Friday as it nears the 2022 lows, and energy stocks are being dragged down with it.</li></ul><p>Why are oil stocks down today? Well, it surely doesn’t help that the S&amp;P 500 is down more than 2% so far in Friday’s session and that crude oil prices are down almost 6%. That impact is being felt across the energy space today and this week.</p><p>For instance, the <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/XLE\">Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF</a> is down 7% on the day. That’s on track for its worst one-day loss since May 9, when it fell 8.4%, and is now down 10.3% for the week. Further, the SPDR S&amp;P Oil &amp; Gas Exploration &amp; Production ETF (NYSEARCA:XOP) is down 8.4% on the day.</p><p>Specifically, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/XOM\">Exxon Mobil</a> is down 5.7% on Friday and is 19.6% off its high. With a $356 billion market capitalization, Exxon is the largest energy company in the U.S.</p><p>Warren Buffett favorite <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/OXY\">Occidental Petroleum</a> is down more than 5% today and almost 9% for the week. It’s hitting its lowest level since Aug. 9. Lastly, Devon Energy (NYSE:DVN) is down almost 10% on the day and more than 15% this week.</p><p>However, to answer the question: “Why are oil stocks down today?” We have a somewhat complex answer.</p><h3>So Why Are Oil Stocks Down Today? Three Reasons</h3><p>We’ve gone from worrying about an energy supply shortage to worrying about a demand drop due to a global recession.</p><p>With fears of a recession in the back of everyone’s mind, oil prices are the lowest they’ve been since January. WTI crude hasn’t traded below $80 since Jan. 11 and earlier today, it marked a session low of $78.04.</p><p>Oil prices topped out at $130.50 in early March. At current prices, oil is down more than $52 a barrel, or a whopping 40%.</p><p>On top of falling energy prices, the surging U.S. dollar is acting as a headwind — both for oil prices and stocks. As the Federal Reserve continues to raise interest rates, the dollar continues to strengthen. A strong dollar is a negative for commodities and that can be seen today as oil, natural gas, copper, gold and other assets sink.</p><p>For what it’s worth, the dollar index is hitting its highest levels in 20 years.</p><p>So in essence, it’s more than just a supply imbalance or lack of demand. It’s worries over the global economy and the rising dollar that are sinking oil and energy prices. And if that weren’t enough, lastly, we have the fall in equities prices. The S&amp;P 500 is within 1% of its 2022 low, as the bear market growls and is not sparing any sector at the moment.</p></body></html>","source":"investorplace","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why Are Oil Stocks XOM, OXY, DVN Down Friday? </title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy Are Oil Stocks XOM, OXY, DVN Down Friday? \n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-09-24 09:13 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://investorplace.com/2022/09/why-are-oil-stocks-xom-oxy-dvn-down-today/><strong>InvestorPlace</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>There are three main reasons to answer the question: \"Why are oil stocks down today?\"Oil is under pressure due to global recession fears and a rising U.S. dollar -- both of which are bad for energy ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://investorplace.com/2022/09/why-are-oil-stocks-xom-oxy-dvn-down-today/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"XOM":"埃克森美孚","OXY":"西方石油","DVN":"德文能源"},"source_url":"https://investorplace.com/2022/09/why-are-oil-stocks-xom-oxy-dvn-down-today/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1191965677","content_text":"There are three main reasons to answer the question: \"Why are oil stocks down today?\"Oil is under pressure due to global recession fears and a rising U.S. dollar -- both of which are bad for energy stocks.Lastly, the S&P 500 is under significant pressure on Friday as it nears the 2022 lows, and energy stocks are being dragged down with it.Why are oil stocks down today? Well, it surely doesn’t help that the S&P 500 is down more than 2% so far in Friday’s session and that crude oil prices are down almost 6%. That impact is being felt across the energy space today and this week.For instance, the Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF is down 7% on the day. That’s on track for its worst one-day loss since May 9, when it fell 8.4%, and is now down 10.3% for the week. Further, the SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (NYSEARCA:XOP) is down 8.4% on the day.Specifically, Exxon Mobil is down 5.7% on Friday and is 19.6% off its high. With a $356 billion market capitalization, Exxon is the largest energy company in the U.S.Warren Buffett favorite Occidental Petroleum is down more than 5% today and almost 9% for the week. It’s hitting its lowest level since Aug. 9. Lastly, Devon Energy (NYSE:DVN) is down almost 10% on the day and more than 15% this week.However, to answer the question: “Why are oil stocks down today?” We have a somewhat complex answer.So Why Are Oil Stocks Down Today? Three ReasonsWe’ve gone from worrying about an energy supply shortage to worrying about a demand drop due to a global recession.With fears of a recession in the back of everyone’s mind, oil prices are the lowest they’ve been since January. WTI crude hasn’t traded below $80 since Jan. 11 and earlier today, it marked a session low of $78.04.Oil prices topped out at $130.50 in early March. At current prices, oil is down more than $52 a barrel, or a whopping 40%.On top of falling energy prices, the surging U.S. dollar is acting as a headwind — both for oil prices and stocks. As the Federal Reserve continues to raise interest rates, the dollar continues to strengthen. A strong dollar is a negative for commodities and that can be seen today as oil, natural gas, copper, gold and other assets sink.For what it’s worth, the dollar index is hitting its highest levels in 20 years.So in essence, it’s more than just a supply imbalance or lack of demand. It’s worries over the global economy and the rising dollar that are sinking oil and energy prices. And if that weren’t enough, lastly, we have the fall in equities prices. The S&P 500 is within 1% of its 2022 low, as the bear market growls and is not sparing any sector at the moment.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":145,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":9097074034,"gmtCreate":1645286833728,"gmtModify":1676534016048,"author":{"id":"3554886109685293","authorId":"3554886109685293","name":"Expert126","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2d4304f2ec7fabd9d599a3ba8b2a17e0","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3554886109685293","authorIdStr":"3554886109685293"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Okokk","listText":"Okokk","text":"Okokk","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":10,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9097074034","repostId":"2212268576","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2212268576","pubTimestamp":1645227827,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2212268576?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-02-19 07:43","market":"us","language":"en","title":"The Smartest Stocks to Buy if the Stock Market Plunges","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2212268576","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"When crashes and corrections rear their head, so does the opportunity for investors.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Since the beginning of the year, Wall Street and investors have been given a reminder that stock market crashes and corrections are perfectly normal occurrences. The double-digit percentage decline the <b>S&amp;P 500</b> experienced in January marks the 39th correction of at least 10% for the widely followed index since the beginning of 1950.</p><p>But where there are crashes and corrections, there&#39;s also opportunity. That&#39;s because every sizable decline in the S&amp;P 500 has eventually been put in the rearview mirror by a bull market rally. If the broader market were to continue to plunge, the following four companies would be some of the smartest stocks to buy.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1b5364080a57bed47540a161b8615747\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"472\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>Image source: Getty Images.</span></p><h2>Berkshire Hathaway</h2><p>In a world where growth stocks have dominated, perhaps no company has more consistently outperformed the broader market for decades than <b>Berkshire Hathaway</b> (NYSE:BRK.A)(NYSE:BRK.B).</p><p>Berkshire might not be a household name, but its CEO, billionaire Warren Buffett, certainly is. Since taking the reins in 1965, Buffett has led his company&#39;s Class A shares (BRK.A) to an average annual gain of better than 20%. In aggregate, we&#39;re talking about a total gain of around 3,800,000% in 57 years.</p><p>One of the key reasons the Oracle of Omaha is such a successful investor is due to his company&#39;s focus on cyclical businesses. Cyclical companies thrive when the economy is running on all cylinders and struggle when recessions arise. Buffett fully understands that recessions typically last for a few months to a couple of quarters. Comparatively, periods of expansion usually last for years, if not a decade. Warren Buffett is allowing time to be his ally and playing a simple numbers game that works in favor of ultra-long-term investors.</p><p>The other not-so-subtle secret to Berkshire Hathaway&#39;s outperformance is dividend income. This year, Buffett&#39;s company is on pace to collect over $5 billion in payouts, which works out to a yield relative to cost of around 5%. Dividend stocks are almost always profitable and time-tested. This means Buffett and his team have packed Berkshire&#39;s portfolio with successful businesses that can navigate whatever the U.S. economy and stock market throw their way.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b13f98298635a74f4491a99bf47eeded\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>Image source: Getty Images.</span></p><h2><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/WBA\">Walgreens Boots Alliance</a></h2><p>Healthcare stocks are usually a wise place to put your money to work if the market plunges. That&#39;s why pharmacy chain and value stock <b>Walgreens Boots Alliance</b> (NASDAQ:WBA) would be such a smart buy.</p><p>No matter how well or poorly the U.S. economy performs, or how high the year-over-year inflation figure rises, people don&#39;t get to choose when they get sick or what ailment(s) they develop. This means demand for prescription drugs, medical devices, and healthcare services tends to remain steady in any economic environment.</p><p>What specifically makes Walgreens so intriguing is the company&#39;s multipoint growth strategy targeting higher margins and a faster organic growth rate. To lift margins, the company has reduced its annual operating expenses by more than $2 billion a full fiscal year ahead of schedule.</p><p>Meanwhile, to boost the company&#39;s organic growth rate, Walgreens is spending aggressively on two key initiatives. First, it&#39;s actively promoting direct-to-consumer sales. Even though the company&#39;s brick-and-mortar locations will account for the lion&#39;s share of revenue, online sales are an easy way to boost organic growth as consumers shift their buying habits.</p><p>Second, Walgreens has partnered with, and invested in, VillageMD to open upwards of 600 co-located, full-service clinics by 2025 in over 30 U.S. markets. These physician-staffed clinics can be used to funnel repeat clients to the company&#39;s higher-margin pharmacy.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e68ecb34d6e4fd6f7dc599908229a09a\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"449\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>Image source: Getty Images.</span></p><h2><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PANW\">Palo Alto Networks</a></h2><p>Another exceptionally smart stock to buy if the market plunges is cybersecurity powerhouse and growth stock <b>Palo Alto Networks</b> (NASDAQ:PANW).</p><p>If you&#39;re noticing a theme with this list, it&#39;s that highly defensive sectors and industries are a smart place to put your money to work when corrections arise. Cybersecurity is a sustained double-digit growth trend which has become a basic necessity for businesses of all sizes that have an online or cloud-based presence. Hackers and robots simply don&#39;t care if Wall Street has a rough day.</p><p>There are two key reasons Palo Alto makes for such an impressive growth story. To begin with, it&#39;s undergoing a business transformation that&#39;s emphasizing subscription services. Even though the company continues to sell physical firewall products, subscription services provide better long-term margins and less revenue lumpiness. Over time, a larger percentage of total sales will derive from these higher-margin channels.</p><p>Palo Alto&#39;s other major growth driver is its many bolt-on acquisitions. Management hasn&#39;t been afraid to deploy capital in order to expand its product portfolio or broaden its pool of potential customers. These acquisitions have been pivotal in helping Palo Alto reach new small and medium-sized businesses.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7343c3ce7330b86321a8ec9384d4baea\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>Image source: Getty Images.</span></p><h2>Bank of America</h2><p>A fourth and final company that would be <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> of the smartest stocks to buy if the market plunges is money-center giant <b>Bank of America</b> (NYSE:BAC).</p><p>Bank stocks like BofA are highly cyclical. Even though they can occasionally get caught up in the short-term emotions that weigh down stocks, they benefit immensely from the natural expansion of the U.S. and global economy over time. This allows patient investors in large bank stocks to build their wealth steadily over time. Not surprisingly, Bank of America is Warren Buffett&#39;s second-largest holding.</p><p>What makes Bank of America such a perfect buy at the moment (and if the market continues to fall) is the upcoming shift in the Federal Reserve&#39;s monetary policy. With U.S. inflation hitting a 40-year high in January, the nation&#39;s central bank has no choice but to aggressively begin raising interest rates. No bank stock is more interest-sensitive than BofA. In its year-end report, the company noted that a 100-basis-point parallel shift in the interest rate yield curve would add an estimated $6.5 billion in net interest income.  In other words, the more inflation becomes an issue, the likelier BofA is to see a big boost to its bottom line.</p><p>Also, as I&#39;ve previously pointed out, Bank of America&#39;s digital push is really paying dividends. Over the past three years, it&#39;s added 5 million new digital active customers and seen the aggregate number of loan sales completed online or via app jump from 31% to 49%. It&#39;s far more cost-effective when customers transact digitally than in person or by phone. As consumers make this digital shift, BofA has consolidated some of its branches and lowered its expenses.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>The Smartest Stocks to Buy if the Stock Market Plunges</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nThe Smartest Stocks to Buy if the Stock Market Plunges\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-02-19 07:43 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/02/18/the-smartest-stocks-to-buy-if-stock-market-plunges/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Since the beginning of the year, Wall Street and investors have been given a reminder that stock market crashes and corrections are perfectly normal occurrences. The double-digit percentage decline ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/02/18/the-smartest-stocks-to-buy-if-stock-market-plunges/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BK4097":"系统软件","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","BK4176":"多领域控股","BAC":"美国银行","WBA":"沃尔格林联合博姿",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","BRK.B":"伯克希尔B","BK4560":"网络安全概念","PANW":"Palo Alto Networks","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓","BK4533":"AQR资本管理(全球第二大对冲基金)","BK4504":"桥水持仓","BRK.A":"伯克希尔","BK4128":"药品零售","BK4559":"巴菲特持仓","BK4532":"文艺复兴科技持仓","BK4207":"综合性银行","BK4553":"喜马拉雅资本持仓"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/02/18/the-smartest-stocks-to-buy-if-stock-market-plunges/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2212268576","content_text":"Since the beginning of the year, Wall Street and investors have been given a reminder that stock market crashes and corrections are perfectly normal occurrences. The double-digit percentage decline the S&P 500 experienced in January marks the 39th correction of at least 10% for the widely followed index since the beginning of 1950.But where there are crashes and corrections, there's also opportunity. That's because every sizable decline in the S&P 500 has eventually been put in the rearview mirror by a bull market rally. If the broader market were to continue to plunge, the following four companies would be some of the smartest stocks to buy.Image source: Getty Images.Berkshire HathawayIn a world where growth stocks have dominated, perhaps no company has more consistently outperformed the broader market for decades than Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE:BRK.A)(NYSE:BRK.B).Berkshire might not be a household name, but its CEO, billionaire Warren Buffett, certainly is. Since taking the reins in 1965, Buffett has led his company's Class A shares (BRK.A) to an average annual gain of better than 20%. In aggregate, we're talking about a total gain of around 3,800,000% in 57 years.One of the key reasons the Oracle of Omaha is such a successful investor is due to his company's focus on cyclical businesses. Cyclical companies thrive when the economy is running on all cylinders and struggle when recessions arise. Buffett fully understands that recessions typically last for a few months to a couple of quarters. Comparatively, periods of expansion usually last for years, if not a decade. Warren Buffett is allowing time to be his ally and playing a simple numbers game that works in favor of ultra-long-term investors.The other not-so-subtle secret to Berkshire Hathaway's outperformance is dividend income. This year, Buffett's company is on pace to collect over $5 billion in payouts, which works out to a yield relative to cost of around 5%. Dividend stocks are almost always profitable and time-tested. This means Buffett and his team have packed Berkshire's portfolio with successful businesses that can navigate whatever the U.S. economy and stock market throw their way.Image source: Getty Images.Walgreens Boots AllianceHealthcare stocks are usually a wise place to put your money to work if the market plunges. That's why pharmacy chain and value stock Walgreens Boots Alliance (NASDAQ:WBA) would be such a smart buy.No matter how well or poorly the U.S. economy performs, or how high the year-over-year inflation figure rises, people don't get to choose when they get sick or what ailment(s) they develop. This means demand for prescription drugs, medical devices, and healthcare services tends to remain steady in any economic environment.What specifically makes Walgreens so intriguing is the company's multipoint growth strategy targeting higher margins and a faster organic growth rate. To lift margins, the company has reduced its annual operating expenses by more than $2 billion a full fiscal year ahead of schedule.Meanwhile, to boost the company's organic growth rate, Walgreens is spending aggressively on two key initiatives. First, it's actively promoting direct-to-consumer sales. Even though the company's brick-and-mortar locations will account for the lion's share of revenue, online sales are an easy way to boost organic growth as consumers shift their buying habits.Second, Walgreens has partnered with, and invested in, VillageMD to open upwards of 600 co-located, full-service clinics by 2025 in over 30 U.S. markets. These physician-staffed clinics can be used to funnel repeat clients to the company's higher-margin pharmacy.Image source: Getty Images.Palo Alto NetworksAnother exceptionally smart stock to buy if the market plunges is cybersecurity powerhouse and growth stock Palo Alto Networks (NASDAQ:PANW).If you're noticing a theme with this list, it's that highly defensive sectors and industries are a smart place to put your money to work when corrections arise. Cybersecurity is a sustained double-digit growth trend which has become a basic necessity for businesses of all sizes that have an online or cloud-based presence. Hackers and robots simply don't care if Wall Street has a rough day.There are two key reasons Palo Alto makes for such an impressive growth story. To begin with, it's undergoing a business transformation that's emphasizing subscription services. Even though the company continues to sell physical firewall products, subscription services provide better long-term margins and less revenue lumpiness. Over time, a larger percentage of total sales will derive from these higher-margin channels.Palo Alto's other major growth driver is its many bolt-on acquisitions. Management hasn't been afraid to deploy capital in order to expand its product portfolio or broaden its pool of potential customers. These acquisitions have been pivotal in helping Palo Alto reach new small and medium-sized businesses.Image source: Getty Images.Bank of AmericaA fourth and final company that would be one of the smartest stocks to buy if the market plunges is money-center giant Bank of America (NYSE:BAC).Bank stocks like BofA are highly cyclical. Even though they can occasionally get caught up in the short-term emotions that weigh down stocks, they benefit immensely from the natural expansion of the U.S. and global economy over time. This allows patient investors in large bank stocks to build their wealth steadily over time. Not surprisingly, Bank of America is Warren Buffett's second-largest holding.What makes Bank of America such a perfect buy at the moment (and if the market continues to fall) is the upcoming shift in the Federal Reserve's monetary policy. With U.S. inflation hitting a 40-year high in January, the nation's central bank has no choice but to aggressively begin raising interest rates. No bank stock is more interest-sensitive than BofA. In its year-end report, the company noted that a 100-basis-point parallel shift in the interest rate yield curve would add an estimated $6.5 billion in net interest income.  In other words, the more inflation becomes an issue, the likelier BofA is to see a big boost to its bottom line.Also, as I've previously pointed out, Bank of America's digital push is really paying dividends. Over the past three years, it's added 5 million new digital active customers and seen the aggregate number of loan sales completed online or via app jump from 31% to 49%. It's far more cost-effective when customers transact digitally than in person or by phone. As consumers make this digital shift, BofA has consolidated some of its branches and lowered its expenses.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":58,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9036164733,"gmtCreate":1647014267777,"gmtModify":1676534187940,"author":{"id":"3554886109685293","authorId":"3554886109685293","name":"Expert126","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2d4304f2ec7fabd9d599a3ba8b2a17e0","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3554886109685293","authorIdStr":"3554886109685293"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ya dropping","listText":"Ya dropping","text":"Ya dropping","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":8,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9036164733","repostId":"1101658670","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1101658670","pubTimestamp":1647011670,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1101658670?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-03-11 23:14","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Is the Stock Market Correction Over?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1101658670","media":"YahooFinance","summary":"History shows we could be nearing the end of thestock market's 2022 correction.\"The current correction in stocks is overdue: we have not had a 10%+ S&P 500 correction since the quick bear market of Ma","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>History shows we could be nearing the end of the stock market&#39;s 2022 correction.</p><p>&#34;The current correction in stocks is overdue: we have not had a 10%+ S&amp;P 500 correction since the quick bear market of March 2020. 10%+ corrections have occurred once per year on average since 1930, and have lasted on average 54 trading days before lifting more than 10% from the trough (since January 3, the market has dropped 13% as of Wednesday&#39;s low and Thursday is the 45th trading day),&#34; pointed out Bank of America strategist Savita Subramanian in a new note.</p><p>Despite the compelling history lesson (which suggests we are nine sessions away from a short-term market bottom), there is still a lot coming at investors that could easily take stocks into a bear market.</p><p>Brent crude oil prices traded around $112 a barrel Thursday as traders continued to digest the Biden administration&#39;s ban of imports of Russian oil, liquefied natural gas and coal in response to the country&#39;s war on Ukraine.</p><p>Prices are off their highs of nearly $139 a barrel on optimism U.S. oil majors such as Exxon and Chevron will produce more to make up for any lost Russian output.</p><p>Oil prices have surged roughly 25% since Ukrainian war.</p><p>Prices at U.S. gas pumps have skyrocketed above $4 a gallon on average,notes AAA. Prices have climbed north of $5 a gallon in California.</p><p>&#34;It is not unfathomable for prices to rocket to $200 a barrel by summer, spur a recession and end the year closer to $50 a barrel ($200 call options have been bid),&#34;said RBC Capital Markets analyst Michael Tran on Yahoo Finance Live.</p><p>Meanwhile, large Western companies from McDonald&#39;s to American Express have suspended operations in Russia due to its war. The financial impacts of these companies taking action against Russia — and their global ramifications — could weigh on corporate earnings in the quarters ahead.</p><p>All of these factors combined have Wall Street pros such as Tran worried about a potential U.S. recession this year.</p><p>Whether one happens is unclear, but it&#39;s something the market will have to likely begin factoring in.</p><p>&#34;I have seen a few recessions over my career and they aren&#39;t fun,&#34; XPO Logistics CEO Brad Jacobs said on Yahoo Finance Live. &#34;I don&#39;t know that we are close to a recession. Right now the consumer is very, very strong and the industrial economy is in its early beginnings of growth. We do have to watch the effect of the European war and how that affects the world economy. We do have to look at how oil prices affect the world. And we do have to see how the Fed lands the plane in terms of raising interest rates in a careful way. But we are not close to a recession, absent some big geopolitical jolt. There is too much strength in the economy right now.&#34;</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Is the Stock Market Correction Over?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nIs the Stock Market Correction Over?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-03-11 23:14 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/is-the-stock-market-correction-over-172801640.html><strong>YahooFinance</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>History shows we could be nearing the end of the stock market's 2022 correction.\"The current correction in stocks is overdue: we have not had a 10%+ S&P 500 correction since the quick bear market of ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/is-the-stock-market-correction-over-172801640.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/is-the-stock-market-correction-over-172801640.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1101658670","content_text":"History shows we could be nearing the end of the stock market's 2022 correction.\"The current correction in stocks is overdue: we have not had a 10%+ S&P 500 correction since the quick bear market of March 2020. 10%+ corrections have occurred once per year on average since 1930, and have lasted on average 54 trading days before lifting more than 10% from the trough (since January 3, the market has dropped 13% as of Wednesday's low and Thursday is the 45th trading day),\" pointed out Bank of America strategist Savita Subramanian in a new note.Despite the compelling history lesson (which suggests we are nine sessions away from a short-term market bottom), there is still a lot coming at investors that could easily take stocks into a bear market.Brent crude oil prices traded around $112 a barrel Thursday as traders continued to digest the Biden administration's ban of imports of Russian oil, liquefied natural gas and coal in response to the country's war on Ukraine.Prices are off their highs of nearly $139 a barrel on optimism U.S. oil majors such as Exxon and Chevron will produce more to make up for any lost Russian output.Oil prices have surged roughly 25% since Ukrainian war.Prices at U.S. gas pumps have skyrocketed above $4 a gallon on average,notes AAA. Prices have climbed north of $5 a gallon in California.\"It is not unfathomable for prices to rocket to $200 a barrel by summer, spur a recession and end the year closer to $50 a barrel ($200 call options have been bid),\"said RBC Capital Markets analyst Michael Tran on Yahoo Finance Live.Meanwhile, large Western companies from McDonald's to American Express have suspended operations in Russia due to its war. The financial impacts of these companies taking action against Russia — and their global ramifications — could weigh on corporate earnings in the quarters ahead.All of these factors combined have Wall Street pros such as Tran worried about a potential U.S. recession this year.Whether one happens is unclear, but it's something the market will have to likely begin factoring in.\"I have seen a few recessions over my career and they aren't fun,\" XPO Logistics CEO Brad Jacobs said on Yahoo Finance Live. \"I don't know that we are close to a recession. Right now the consumer is very, very strong and the industrial economy is in its early beginnings of growth. We do have to watch the effect of the European war and how that affects the world economy. We do have to look at how oil prices affect the world. And we do have to see how the Fed lands the plane in terms of raising interest rates in a careful way. But we are not close to a recession, absent some big geopolitical jolt. There is too much strength in the economy right now.\"","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":122,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9038591341,"gmtCreate":1646867322822,"gmtModify":1676534170405,"author":{"id":"3554886109685293","authorId":"3554886109685293","name":"Expert126","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2d4304f2ec7fabd9d599a3ba8b2a17e0","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3554886109685293","authorIdStr":"3554886109685293"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Nice","listText":"Nice","text":"Nice","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9038591341","repostId":"2218231216","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2218231216","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1646867226,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2218231216?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-03-10 07:07","market":"us","language":"en","title":"US STOCKS-Tech, Financials Lead Resurgent Wall St as Oil Plunges","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2218231216","media":"Reuters","summary":"U.S. stocks surged on Wednesday led by financial and tech shares, rebounding from several down days as oil prices pulled back sharply after fanning inflationary fears and investors gauged developments","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>U.S. stocks surged on Wednesday led by financial and tech shares, rebounding from several down days as oil prices pulled back sharply after fanning inflationary fears and investors gauged developments in the Ukraine crisis.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 posted its biggest <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a>-day percentage gain since June 2020, while the Nasdaq tallied its biggest rise since March 2021.</p><p>Global oil prices posted their biggest plunge since the early pandemic days nearly two years ago, after the United Arab Emirates said the OPEC member would support increasing output into a market in disarray because of supply disruptions caused by sanctions imposed on Russia over its conflict with Ukraine.</p><p>A steep rise in oil and other commodities has sparked concerns about a further jolt to rising inflation and the potential for slowing economic growth.</p><p>&#34;I think it is an oversold rally on cooling in commodities,” said Walter Todd, chief investment officer at Greenwood Capital. “Stocks have been sold pretty aggressively for a few days. I don’t know that it permanently changes the direction of things.”</p><p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average    rose 653.61 points, or 2%, to 33,286.25, the S&amp;P 500    gained 107.18 points, or 2.57%, to 4,277.88 and the Nasdaq Composite    added 460.00 points, or 3.59%, to 13,255.55.</p><p>The heavyweight technology group and financials were the top-gaining S&amp;P 500 sectors, rising 4% and 3.6% respectively.</p><p>Energy, which has been the standout sector performer in 2022, fell 3.2% as benchmark Brent crude slid to around $110 a barrel from over $130 earlier in the week.</p><p>Travel and leisure stocks, which have been hit hard recently, also soared, with shares of Carnival Corp rising 8.8% and United Airlines Holdings up 8.3%.</p><p>“The market is taking a break, consolidating from this downtrend that has seen a lot of stocks getting really, really hammered, especially on the growth side of the market,” said Anu Gaggar, global investment strategist for Commonwealth Financial Network.</p><p>In the latest developments, Ukraine accused Russia of bombing a children&#39;s hospital in the besieged port of Mariupol during an agreed ceasefire to enable civilians trapped in the city to escape.</p><p>Ukraine&#39;s Foreign Minister Dmytro Kuleba was due to meet Russian foreign minister Sergei Lavrov in Turkey on Thursday.</p><p>Stocks have struggled as concerns about the Russia-Ukraine crisis have deepened a sell-off initially fueled by worries over higher bond yields as the Federal Reserve is expected to tighten monetary policy this year to fight inflation.</p><p>On Monday, the Nasdaq confirmed it was in a bear market, falling over 20% from its record high, while the Dow Jones Industrial Average confirmed it was in a correction as it closed more than 10% lower from its record peak.</p><p>Investors were awaiting Thursday&#39;s report on U.S. consumer prices as a key data release ahead of the Fed&#39;s March 15-16 meeting.</p><p>Advancing issues outnumbered declining ones on the NYSE by a 2.75-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 3.66-to-1 ratio favored advancers.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 posted two new 52-week highs and three new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 32 new highs and 53 new lows.</p><p>About 14 billion shares changed hands in U.S. exchanges, compared with the 13.6 billion daily average over the last 20 sessions.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>US STOCKS-Tech, Financials Lead Resurgent Wall St as Oil Plunges</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nUS STOCKS-Tech, Financials Lead Resurgent Wall St as Oil Plunges\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-03-10 07:07</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>U.S. stocks surged on Wednesday led by financial and tech shares, rebounding from several down days as oil prices pulled back sharply after fanning inflationary fears and investors gauged developments in the Ukraine crisis.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 posted its biggest <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a>-day percentage gain since June 2020, while the Nasdaq tallied its biggest rise since March 2021.</p><p>Global oil prices posted their biggest plunge since the early pandemic days nearly two years ago, after the United Arab Emirates said the OPEC member would support increasing output into a market in disarray because of supply disruptions caused by sanctions imposed on Russia over its conflict with Ukraine.</p><p>A steep rise in oil and other commodities has sparked concerns about a further jolt to rising inflation and the potential for slowing economic growth.</p><p>&#34;I think it is an oversold rally on cooling in commodities,” said Walter Todd, chief investment officer at Greenwood Capital. “Stocks have been sold pretty aggressively for a few days. I don’t know that it permanently changes the direction of things.”</p><p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average    rose 653.61 points, or 2%, to 33,286.25, the S&amp;P 500    gained 107.18 points, or 2.57%, to 4,277.88 and the Nasdaq Composite    added 460.00 points, or 3.59%, to 13,255.55.</p><p>The heavyweight technology group and financials were the top-gaining S&amp;P 500 sectors, rising 4% and 3.6% respectively.</p><p>Energy, which has been the standout sector performer in 2022, fell 3.2% as benchmark Brent crude slid to around $110 a barrel from over $130 earlier in the week.</p><p>Travel and leisure stocks, which have been hit hard recently, also soared, with shares of Carnival Corp rising 8.8% and United Airlines Holdings up 8.3%.</p><p>“The market is taking a break, consolidating from this downtrend that has seen a lot of stocks getting really, really hammered, especially on the growth side of the market,” said Anu Gaggar, global investment strategist for Commonwealth Financial Network.</p><p>In the latest developments, Ukraine accused Russia of bombing a children&#39;s hospital in the besieged port of Mariupol during an agreed ceasefire to enable civilians trapped in the city to escape.</p><p>Ukraine&#39;s Foreign Minister Dmytro Kuleba was due to meet Russian foreign minister Sergei Lavrov in Turkey on Thursday.</p><p>Stocks have struggled as concerns about the Russia-Ukraine crisis have deepened a sell-off initially fueled by worries over higher bond yields as the Federal Reserve is expected to tighten monetary policy this year to fight inflation.</p><p>On Monday, the Nasdaq confirmed it was in a bear market, falling over 20% from its record high, while the Dow Jones Industrial Average confirmed it was in a correction as it closed more than 10% lower from its record peak.</p><p>Investors were awaiting Thursday&#39;s report on U.S. consumer prices as a key data release ahead of the Fed&#39;s March 15-16 meeting.</p><p>Advancing issues outnumbered declining ones on the NYSE by a 2.75-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 3.66-to-1 ratio favored advancers.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 posted two new 52-week highs and three new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 32 new highs and 53 new lows.</p><p>About 14 billion shares changed hands in U.S. exchanges, compared with the 13.6 billion daily average over the last 20 sessions.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2218231216","content_text":"U.S. stocks surged on Wednesday led by financial and tech shares, rebounding from several down days as oil prices pulled back sharply after fanning inflationary fears and investors gauged developments in the Ukraine crisis.The S&P 500 posted its biggest one-day percentage gain since June 2020, while the Nasdaq tallied its biggest rise since March 2021.Global oil prices posted their biggest plunge since the early pandemic days nearly two years ago, after the United Arab Emirates said the OPEC member would support increasing output into a market in disarray because of supply disruptions caused by sanctions imposed on Russia over its conflict with Ukraine.A steep rise in oil and other commodities has sparked concerns about a further jolt to rising inflation and the potential for slowing economic growth.\"I think it is an oversold rally on cooling in commodities,” said Walter Todd, chief investment officer at Greenwood Capital. “Stocks have been sold pretty aggressively for a few days. I don’t know that it permanently changes the direction of things.”The Dow Jones Industrial Average    rose 653.61 points, or 2%, to 33,286.25, the S&P 500    gained 107.18 points, or 2.57%, to 4,277.88 and the Nasdaq Composite    added 460.00 points, or 3.59%, to 13,255.55.The heavyweight technology group and financials were the top-gaining S&P 500 sectors, rising 4% and 3.6% respectively.Energy, which has been the standout sector performer in 2022, fell 3.2% as benchmark Brent crude slid to around $110 a barrel from over $130 earlier in the week.Travel and leisure stocks, which have been hit hard recently, also soared, with shares of Carnival Corp rising 8.8% and United Airlines Holdings up 8.3%.“The market is taking a break, consolidating from this downtrend that has seen a lot of stocks getting really, really hammered, especially on the growth side of the market,” said Anu Gaggar, global investment strategist for Commonwealth Financial Network.In the latest developments, Ukraine accused Russia of bombing a children's hospital in the besieged port of Mariupol during an agreed ceasefire to enable civilians trapped in the city to escape.Ukraine's Foreign Minister Dmytro Kuleba was due to meet Russian foreign minister Sergei Lavrov in Turkey on Thursday.Stocks have struggled as concerns about the Russia-Ukraine crisis have deepened a sell-off initially fueled by worries over higher bond yields as the Federal Reserve is expected to tighten monetary policy this year to fight inflation.On Monday, the Nasdaq confirmed it was in a bear market, falling over 20% from its record high, while the Dow Jones Industrial Average confirmed it was in a correction as it closed more than 10% lower from its record peak.Investors were awaiting Thursday's report on U.S. consumer prices as a key data release ahead of the Fed's March 15-16 meeting.Advancing issues outnumbered declining ones on the NYSE by a 2.75-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 3.66-to-1 ratio favored advancers.The S&P 500 posted two new 52-week highs and three new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 32 new highs and 53 new lows.About 14 billion shares changed hands in U.S. exchanges, compared with the 13.6 billion daily average over the last 20 sessions.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":78,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9980101297,"gmtCreate":1665667843019,"gmtModify":1676537645761,"author":{"id":"3554886109685293","authorId":"3554886109685293","name":"Expert126","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2d4304f2ec7fabd9d599a3ba8b2a17e0","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3554886109685293","authorIdStr":"3554886109685293"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ikok","listText":"Ikok","text":"Ikok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":11,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9980101297","repostId":"1174256425","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1174256425","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1665674838,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1174256425?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-10-13 23:27","market":"us","language":"en","title":"September CPI Rises More Than Expected; Core CPI Rises to 40-Year High","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1174256425","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Core consumer price index jumps to 40-year highThe numbers: The cost of living rose 0.4% in Septembe","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Core consumer price index jumps to 40-year high</p><p>The numbers: The cost of living rose 0.4% in September and pointed to high inflation persisting through the end of the year, reinforcing the view the Federal Reserve will keep raising interest rates aggressively to try to curb rampant price increases.</p><p>Economists polled by The Wall Street Journal had forecast a 0.3% increase.</p><p>The yearly rate of inflation slipped to 8.2 from 8.3%. Inflation peaked at a nearly 41-year high of 9.1% in June.</p><p>In another worrisome sign, the so-called core rate of inflation that omits food and energy prices jumped a sharp 0.6%. Wall Street had forecast a 0.4% gain.</p><p>The increase in the core rate over the past year climbed to a new peak of 6.6% from 6.3%, marking the biggest gain in 40 years.</p><p>The Fed views the core rate as a more accurate measure of future inflation trends.</p><p>The cost of staples such as food, rent, medical care and new cars all rose last month.</p><p>Inflation rose an average of less than 2% a year in the decade preceding the pandemic.</p><p>Still, the higher cost of borrowing is expected to weaken the economy over the next year and pull inflation lower. Prices tend to fall when consumers spend less and demand for goods and services dry up.</p><p>The Fed may have to raise rates so high to beat back inflation, however, that it could tip the economy into recession. The annual rate of inflation is more than quadruple the pre-pandemic levels of less than 2%.</p><p>Top officials signaled they will do what it takes to beat down inflation -- even at the cost of recession -- at the Fed&#39;s last big meeting in September.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>September CPI Rises More Than Expected; Core CPI Rises to 40-Year High</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSeptember CPI Rises More Than Expected; Core CPI Rises to 40-Year High\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-10-13 23:27</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>Core consumer price index jumps to 40-year high</p><p>The numbers: The cost of living rose 0.4% in September and pointed to high inflation persisting through the end of the year, reinforcing the view the Federal Reserve will keep raising interest rates aggressively to try to curb rampant price increases.</p><p>Economists polled by The Wall Street Journal had forecast a 0.3% increase.</p><p>The yearly rate of inflation slipped to 8.2 from 8.3%. Inflation peaked at a nearly 41-year high of 9.1% in June.</p><p>In another worrisome sign, the so-called core rate of inflation that omits food and energy prices jumped a sharp 0.6%. Wall Street had forecast a 0.4% gain.</p><p>The increase in the core rate over the past year climbed to a new peak of 6.6% from 6.3%, marking the biggest gain in 40 years.</p><p>The Fed views the core rate as a more accurate measure of future inflation trends.</p><p>The cost of staples such as food, rent, medical care and new cars all rose last month.</p><p>Inflation rose an average of less than 2% a year in the decade preceding the pandemic.</p><p>Still, the higher cost of borrowing is expected to weaken the economy over the next year and pull inflation lower. Prices tend to fall when consumers spend less and demand for goods and services dry up.</p><p>The Fed may have to raise rates so high to beat back inflation, however, that it could tip the economy into recession. The annual rate of inflation is more than quadruple the pre-pandemic levels of less than 2%.</p><p>Top officials signaled they will do what it takes to beat down inflation -- even at the cost of recession -- at the Fed&#39;s last big meeting in September.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1174256425","content_text":"Core consumer price index jumps to 40-year highThe numbers: The cost of living rose 0.4% in September and pointed to high inflation persisting through the end of the year, reinforcing the view the Federal Reserve will keep raising interest rates aggressively to try to curb rampant price increases.Economists polled by The Wall Street Journal had forecast a 0.3% increase.The yearly rate of inflation slipped to 8.2 from 8.3%. Inflation peaked at a nearly 41-year high of 9.1% in June.In another worrisome sign, the so-called core rate of inflation that omits food and energy prices jumped a sharp 0.6%. Wall Street had forecast a 0.4% gain.The increase in the core rate over the past year climbed to a new peak of 6.6% from 6.3%, marking the biggest gain in 40 years.The Fed views the core rate as a more accurate measure of future inflation trends.The cost of staples such as food, rent, medical care and new cars all rose last month.Inflation rose an average of less than 2% a year in the decade preceding the pandemic.Still, the higher cost of borrowing is expected to weaken the economy over the next year and pull inflation lower. Prices tend to fall when consumers spend less and demand for goods and services dry up.The Fed may have to raise rates so high to beat back inflation, however, that it could tip the economy into recession. The annual rate of inflation is more than quadruple the pre-pandemic levels of less than 2%.Top officials signaled they will do what it takes to beat down inflation -- even at the cost of recession -- at the Fed's last big meeting in September.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":531,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9087168783,"gmtCreate":1650977160748,"gmtModify":1676534825780,"author":{"id":"3554886109685293","authorId":"3554886109685293","name":"Expert126","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2d4304f2ec7fabd9d599a3ba8b2a17e0","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3554886109685293","authorIdStr":"3554886109685293"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":9,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9087168783","repostId":"1152069672","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1152069672","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1650976148,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1152069672?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-04-26 20:29","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Pre-Bell | U.S. Futures Edge Lower as Investors Focus on Big Tech Earnings","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1152069672","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"U.S. stock index futures slipped on Tuesday, as investors waited to see if earnings from Big Tech co","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>U.S. stock index futures slipped on Tuesday, as investors waited to see if earnings from Big Tech companies this week will provide support to a market worried about high inflation and slowing global growth.</p><p><b>Market Snapshot</b></p><p>At 08:26 a.m. ET, Dow e-minis were down 128 points, or 0.38%, S&amp;P 500 e-minis were down 13.5 points, or 0.31%, and Nasdaq 100 e-minis were down 41.5 points, or 0.31%.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d6524f1f2ea5e0a3ec18cb3d03d4b55b\" tg-width=\"416\" tg-height=\"177\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p><b>Pre-Market Movers</b></p><p><b>PepsiCo</b> – Shares of the food and beverage giant dipped in the premarket although the companyreported a beat on the top and bottom lines in the recent quarteras consumers paid more for some of the company’s key brands.</p><p><b>General Electric </b>– General Electric’s stock fell 3.5% despite topping estimates in its quarterly report. The company confirmed its previous full-year profit guidance range and said it sees challenges from inflation and supply chain issues.</p><p><b>United Parcel Services</b> — Shares of the shipping and logistics giant gained 1.7% after beating analyst estimates on the top and bottom lines.UPS reported adjusted earnings per share of $3.05 on revenues of $24.38 billion while analysts expected $2.88 earnings per share on $23.79 billion in revenue.</p><p><b>3M</b> – 3M shares were flat premarket after reporting quarterly earnings that topped estimates. The company saw revenues of $8.83 billion while analysts expected $8.74 billion in revenue.</p><p><b>D.R. Horton</b> — The homebuilder stock rose 2.8% during premarket trading after beating analyst estimates in the previous quarter. D.R. Horton reported adjusted earnings of $4.03 a share on revenues of $8 billion. Analysts anticipated $3.37 adjusted earnings per share on $7.62 billion in revenue.</p><p><b>SeaWorld</b> — The theme park and entertainment company’s stock surged 4.6% after Rosenblatt Securities initiated coverage with a buy and said despite pandemic headwinds the company has faired well under the vision of big investor Scott Ross.</p><p><b>Market News</b></p><p>Elon Musk clinched a deal to buy Twitter Inc for $44 billion on Monday in a transaction that will shift control of the social media platform populated by millions of users and global leaders to the world&#39;s richest person.</p><p>Tesla bull Cathie Wood-led Ark Investment Management sold some more shares in the Elon Musk-led company on a day the billionaire entrepreneur clinched a $44 billion deal to buy microblogging site Twitter Inc.</p><p>The popular money managing firm sold 8,295 Tesla shares, estimated to be worth $8.28 million, based on Monday&#39;s closing price.</p><p>UBS posted its best first-quarter net profit in 15 years on Tuesday with a 17% jump on the back of strong trading, upending expectations for a fall amidst uncertainties over the war in Ukraine.</p><p>The $2.14 billion net profit for the March quarter outpaced average expectations for $1.79 billion in a poll of 21 analysts compiled by the Swiss bank.</p><p>A steakhouse lunch with Berkshire Hathaway Inc. Chief Executive Warren Buffett will return to the auction block this June after the annual charity fundraiser was put on a two-year pause during the Covid-19 pandemic.</p><p>This will be the last time bidders can vie for a sit-down lunch with Mr. Buffett, who has raised $34 million for a California homeless organization over the past two decades with his Power of One event.</p><p>PepsiCo Inc beat estimates for quarterly revenue on Tuesday and raised its full-year forecast on steady demand for its sodas and snacks even in the face of several rounds of price increases.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Pre-Bell | U.S. Futures Edge Lower as Investors Focus on Big Tech Earnings</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nPre-Bell | U.S. Futures Edge Lower as Investors Focus on Big Tech Earnings\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-04-26 20:29</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>U.S. stock index futures slipped on Tuesday, as investors waited to see if earnings from Big Tech companies this week will provide support to a market worried about high inflation and slowing global growth.</p><p><b>Market Snapshot</b></p><p>At 08:26 a.m. ET, Dow e-minis were down 128 points, or 0.38%, S&amp;P 500 e-minis were down 13.5 points, or 0.31%, and Nasdaq 100 e-minis were down 41.5 points, or 0.31%.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d6524f1f2ea5e0a3ec18cb3d03d4b55b\" tg-width=\"416\" tg-height=\"177\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p><b>Pre-Market Movers</b></p><p><b>PepsiCo</b> – Shares of the food and beverage giant dipped in the premarket although the companyreported a beat on the top and bottom lines in the recent quarteras consumers paid more for some of the company’s key brands.</p><p><b>General Electric </b>– General Electric’s stock fell 3.5% despite topping estimates in its quarterly report. The company confirmed its previous full-year profit guidance range and said it sees challenges from inflation and supply chain issues.</p><p><b>United Parcel Services</b> — Shares of the shipping and logistics giant gained 1.7% after beating analyst estimates on the top and bottom lines.UPS reported adjusted earnings per share of $3.05 on revenues of $24.38 billion while analysts expected $2.88 earnings per share on $23.79 billion in revenue.</p><p><b>3M</b> – 3M shares were flat premarket after reporting quarterly earnings that topped estimates. The company saw revenues of $8.83 billion while analysts expected $8.74 billion in revenue.</p><p><b>D.R. Horton</b> — The homebuilder stock rose 2.8% during premarket trading after beating analyst estimates in the previous quarter. D.R. Horton reported adjusted earnings of $4.03 a share on revenues of $8 billion. Analysts anticipated $3.37 adjusted earnings per share on $7.62 billion in revenue.</p><p><b>SeaWorld</b> — The theme park and entertainment company’s stock surged 4.6% after Rosenblatt Securities initiated coverage with a buy and said despite pandemic headwinds the company has faired well under the vision of big investor Scott Ross.</p><p><b>Market News</b></p><p>Elon Musk clinched a deal to buy Twitter Inc for $44 billion on Monday in a transaction that will shift control of the social media platform populated by millions of users and global leaders to the world&#39;s richest person.</p><p>Tesla bull Cathie Wood-led Ark Investment Management sold some more shares in the Elon Musk-led company on a day the billionaire entrepreneur clinched a $44 billion deal to buy microblogging site Twitter Inc.</p><p>The popular money managing firm sold 8,295 Tesla shares, estimated to be worth $8.28 million, based on Monday&#39;s closing price.</p><p>UBS posted its best first-quarter net profit in 15 years on Tuesday with a 17% jump on the back of strong trading, upending expectations for a fall amidst uncertainties over the war in Ukraine.</p><p>The $2.14 billion net profit for the March quarter outpaced average expectations for $1.79 billion in a poll of 21 analysts compiled by the Swiss bank.</p><p>A steakhouse lunch with Berkshire Hathaway Inc. Chief Executive Warren Buffett will return to the auction block this June after the annual charity fundraiser was put on a two-year pause during the Covid-19 pandemic.</p><p>This will be the last time bidders can vie for a sit-down lunch with Mr. Buffett, who has raised $34 million for a California homeless organization over the past two decades with his Power of One event.</p><p>PepsiCo Inc beat estimates for quarterly revenue on Tuesday and raised its full-year forecast on steady demand for its sodas and snacks even in the face of several rounds of price increases.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯","MMM":"3M","DHI":"霍顿房屋","GE":"GE航空航天",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite","PEP":"百事可乐"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1152069672","content_text":"U.S. stock index futures slipped on Tuesday, as investors waited to see if earnings from Big Tech companies this week will provide support to a market worried about high inflation and slowing global growth.Market SnapshotAt 08:26 a.m. ET, Dow e-minis were down 128 points, or 0.38%, S&P 500 e-minis were down 13.5 points, or 0.31%, and Nasdaq 100 e-minis were down 41.5 points, or 0.31%.Pre-Market MoversPepsiCo – Shares of the food and beverage giant dipped in the premarket although the companyreported a beat on the top and bottom lines in the recent quarteras consumers paid more for some of the company’s key brands.General Electric – General Electric’s stock fell 3.5% despite topping estimates in its quarterly report. The company confirmed its previous full-year profit guidance range and said it sees challenges from inflation and supply chain issues.United Parcel Services — Shares of the shipping and logistics giant gained 1.7% after beating analyst estimates on the top and bottom lines.UPS reported adjusted earnings per share of $3.05 on revenues of $24.38 billion while analysts expected $2.88 earnings per share on $23.79 billion in revenue.3M – 3M shares were flat premarket after reporting quarterly earnings that topped estimates. The company saw revenues of $8.83 billion while analysts expected $8.74 billion in revenue.D.R. Horton — The homebuilder stock rose 2.8% during premarket trading after beating analyst estimates in the previous quarter. D.R. Horton reported adjusted earnings of $4.03 a share on revenues of $8 billion. Analysts anticipated $3.37 adjusted earnings per share on $7.62 billion in revenue.SeaWorld — The theme park and entertainment company’s stock surged 4.6% after Rosenblatt Securities initiated coverage with a buy and said despite pandemic headwinds the company has faired well under the vision of big investor Scott Ross.Market NewsElon Musk clinched a deal to buy Twitter Inc for $44 billion on Monday in a transaction that will shift control of the social media platform populated by millions of users and global leaders to the world's richest person.Tesla bull Cathie Wood-led Ark Investment Management sold some more shares in the Elon Musk-led company on a day the billionaire entrepreneur clinched a $44 billion deal to buy microblogging site Twitter Inc.The popular money managing firm sold 8,295 Tesla shares, estimated to be worth $8.28 million, based on Monday's closing price.UBS posted its best first-quarter net profit in 15 years on Tuesday with a 17% jump on the back of strong trading, upending expectations for a fall amidst uncertainties over the war in Ukraine.The $2.14 billion net profit for the March quarter outpaced average expectations for $1.79 billion in a poll of 21 analysts compiled by the Swiss bank.A steakhouse lunch with Berkshire Hathaway Inc. Chief Executive Warren Buffett will return to the auction block this June after the annual charity fundraiser was put on a two-year pause during the Covid-19 pandemic.This will be the last time bidders can vie for a sit-down lunch with Mr. Buffett, who has raised $34 million for a California homeless organization over the past two decades with his Power of One event.PepsiCo Inc beat estimates for quarterly revenue on Tuesday and raised its full-year forecast on steady demand for its sodas and snacks even in the face of several rounds of price increases.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":41,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9014957636,"gmtCreate":1649593589537,"gmtModify":1676534535258,"author":{"id":"3554886109685293","authorId":"3554886109685293","name":"Expert126","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2d4304f2ec7fabd9d599a3ba8b2a17e0","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3554886109685293","authorIdStr":"3554886109685293"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Sure?","listText":"Sure?","text":"Sure?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9014957636","repostId":"2226574336","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2226574336","pubTimestamp":1649553875,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2226574336?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-04-10 09:24","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Nasdaq Bear Market: 4 Beaten-Down Growth Stocks You'll Regret Not Buying On the Dip","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2226574336","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"A big decline in the technology-driven Nasdaq is the ideal time to invest in these innovative companies.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>It&#39;s been a tumultuous start to 2022 for new and tenured investors. Both the iconic <b>Dow Jones Industrial Average</b> and widely followed <b>S&amp;P 500 </b>officially dipped into correction territory with drops surpassing 10%. But for the tech-focused <b>Nasdaq Composite</b>, the decline was even more pronounced. Between mid-November and mid-March, the famed index shed 22% of its value and briefly entered a bear market.</p><p>While big declines in the major market indexes can be scary in the short run, they&#39;ve historically proven to be the ideal time to put your money to work. That&#39;s because every notable dip in the market, which includes the Nasdaq Composite, has eventually been cleared away by a bull market rally.</p><p>Below are four beaten-down growth stocks you&#39;ll likely regret not buying on the bear market dip in the Nasdaq.</p><h2>CrowdStrike Holdings</h2><p>One of the smartest buys investors can make during the Nasdaq pullback is cybersecurity stock <b>CrowdStrike Holdings</b>. Shares of the company have fallen 26% since the Nasdaq hit an all-time high in November.</p><p>The beauty of cybersecurity stocks is that they&#39;ve evolved into a basic necessity service. With businesses shifting their data online and into the cloud at an accelerated rate since the pandemic began, the onus of protecting this data from hackers and robots is increasingly falling on third-party providers like CrowdStrike.</p><p>What makes CrowdStrike the cybersecurity company to own is its cloud-native security platform, known as Falcon. Falcon oversees about 1 trillion events daily and relies on artificial intelligence (AI) to keep end users safe. Since it&#39;s built in the cloud and leaning on AI, Falcon can identify and respond to end-user threats faster and more effectively than virtually all on-premises security solutions.</p><p>Over the past five years, CrowdStrike&#39;s subscriber count has catapulted from 450 to 16,325, which represents a compound annual growth rate of 105.1%.  Equally important, its existing customers are consistently spending more. In five years, the percentage of clients with four or more cloud-module subscriptions has jumped from less than 10% to 69%. This is why CrowdStrike&#39;s adjusted subscription gross margin is nearly 80%.</p><h2>PubMatic</h2><p>Another beaten-down high-growth stock you&#39;ll regret not buying on the dip is programmatic ad-tech company <b>PubMatic</b>. Shares of PubMatic are down more than 30% since November and almost 65% since hitting an all-time high in March 2021.</p><p>PubMatic&#39;s sustainable growth driver is the steady shift of advertising dollars from print to various digital formats. What PubMatic&#39;s cloud-based infrastructure does is oversee the sale of digital advertising space for its clients (i.e., publishers). Interestingly, this doesn&#39;t always mean placing the highest-priced ad in a display space. Rather, PubMatic&#39;s machine-learning algorithms will aim to place relevant ads in front of users. This keeps advertisers happy and can ultimately boost the long-term ad-pricing power for PubMatic&#39;s clients over the long run.</p><p>Although global digital ad spend is expected to increase by a little over 10% on an annual basis through 2024, PubMatic has been growing considerably faster.  Last year, the company&#39;s organic growth rate was 49% and was driven by mobile, video, and connected TV (CTV) programmatic ads. In fact, CTV ad revenue grew more than sixfold in the fourth quarter from the prior-year period.</p><p>With PubMatic profitable on a recurring basis and forecast to grow sales by close to 25% in 2022 and 2023, it makes for the perfect stock to buy following a big dip in the Nasdaq.</p><h2><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PYPL\">PayPal</a> Holdings</h2><p>A third beaten-down growth stock that&#39;s begging to be bought on this decline is fintech giant <b>PayPal Holdings</b>. PayPal&#39;s stock has fallen 62% since July 2021.</p><p>As with CrowdStrike and PubMatic, PayPal has a no-brainer growth opportunity on its doorstep. In this instance, I&#39;m talking about digital payments. Even with competition in the digital payments space heating up, PayPal recorded $1.25 trillion in total payment volume (TPV) in 2021 and expects TPV will climb to or beyond $1.5 trillion in 2022.</p><p>What&#39;s arguably the most impressive aspect of PayPal is the growing number of payments from existing users. In 2020, there were fewer than 41 transactions per active account. Last year, this figure surpassed 45 per active account (over 19 billion transactions spanning 426 million active users).  These figures show how quickly the payments landscape is going digital.</p><p>PayPal&#39;s abundant cash flow has also allowed the company to roll out new products and services. The company began allowing users to buy, hold, and sell cryptocurrencies in 2020, and is tinkering with launching a U.S. stock trading platform. It used its mountain of cash to acquire buy now, pay later solutions company Paidy last September, too.</p><p>At just a hair over 20 times Wall Street&#39;s forward-year earnings forecast, PayPal is arguably the cheapest it&#39;s ever been as a public company.</p><h2>Upstart Holdings</h2><p>The fourth and final beaten-down growth stock you&#39;ll regret not buying on the dip is cloud-based lending platform <b>Upstart Holdings</b>. Shares of the company have lost three-quarters of their value since October and are down close to 55% since the Nasdaq Composite hit its all-time high.</p><p>Upstart&#39;s claim to fame is the company&#39;s AI-driven lending platform. The traditional loan-vetting process can take quite a bit of time and be costly for both lending institutions and the party looking for a loan. Upstart&#39;s AI-powered platform can give on-the-spot answers (approval or denial) to roughly two-thirds of personal loan applicants. Furthermore, because the platform relies on machine learning, people who might not otherwise qualify for a loan under the traditional vetting process are sometimes approved using Upstart&#39;s process. In other words, it&#39;s democratizing access to financial services without putting lending institutions at a higher risk of loan delinquencies.</p><p>Something else investors should take note of is that 94% of fourth-quarter revenue came from fees and services tied to the lending institutions it caters to. In short, there&#39;s no credit exposure or loan delinquency risk when it comes to Upstart. This means a rising-rate environment shouldn&#39;t chase investors away from this rapidly growing company.</p><p>If you need <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> more good reason to be excited about Upstart (aside from the company crushing Wall Street&#39;s earnings expectations on a regular basis), consider its acquisition of Prodigy Software in 2021. This buyout allows Upstart to push into AI-based auto loans, which is a considerably larger addressable market than personal loans.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Nasdaq Bear Market: 4 Beaten-Down Growth Stocks You'll Regret Not Buying On the Dip</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nNasdaq Bear Market: 4 Beaten-Down Growth Stocks You'll Regret Not Buying On the Dip\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-04-10 09:24 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/04/09/nasdaq-bear-market-4-growth-stocks-regret-not-buy/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>It's been a tumultuous start to 2022 for new and tenured investors. Both the iconic Dow Jones Industrial Average and widely followed S&P 500 officially dipped into correction territory with drops ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/04/09/nasdaq-bear-market-4-growth-stocks-regret-not-buy/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BK4535":"淡马锡持仓","BK4527":"明星科技股","BK4543":"AI","BK4166":"消费信贷","PUBM":"PubMatic, Inc.","UPST":"Upstart Holdings, Inc.","BK4551":"寇图资本持仓","CRWD":"CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.","BK4561":"索罗斯持仓","BK4581":"高盛持仓","BK4528":"SaaS概念","CTV":"Innovid","BK4023":"应用软件","BK4554":"元宇宙及AR概念","BK4106":"数据处理与外包服务","PYPL":"PayPal","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","AI":"C3.ai, Inc.","BK4533":"AQR资本管理(全球第二大对冲基金)","BK4566":"资本集团","BK4524":"宅经济概念"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/04/09/nasdaq-bear-market-4-growth-stocks-regret-not-buy/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2226574336","content_text":"It's been a tumultuous start to 2022 for new and tenured investors. Both the iconic Dow Jones Industrial Average and widely followed S&P 500 officially dipped into correction territory with drops surpassing 10%. But for the tech-focused Nasdaq Composite, the decline was even more pronounced. Between mid-November and mid-March, the famed index shed 22% of its value and briefly entered a bear market.While big declines in the major market indexes can be scary in the short run, they've historically proven to be the ideal time to put your money to work. That's because every notable dip in the market, which includes the Nasdaq Composite, has eventually been cleared away by a bull market rally.Below are four beaten-down growth stocks you'll likely regret not buying on the bear market dip in the Nasdaq.CrowdStrike HoldingsOne of the smartest buys investors can make during the Nasdaq pullback is cybersecurity stock CrowdStrike Holdings. Shares of the company have fallen 26% since the Nasdaq hit an all-time high in November.The beauty of cybersecurity stocks is that they've evolved into a basic necessity service. With businesses shifting their data online and into the cloud at an accelerated rate since the pandemic began, the onus of protecting this data from hackers and robots is increasingly falling on third-party providers like CrowdStrike.What makes CrowdStrike the cybersecurity company to own is its cloud-native security platform, known as Falcon. Falcon oversees about 1 trillion events daily and relies on artificial intelligence (AI) to keep end users safe. Since it's built in the cloud and leaning on AI, Falcon can identify and respond to end-user threats faster and more effectively than virtually all on-premises security solutions.Over the past five years, CrowdStrike's subscriber count has catapulted from 450 to 16,325, which represents a compound annual growth rate of 105.1%.  Equally important, its existing customers are consistently spending more. In five years, the percentage of clients with four or more cloud-module subscriptions has jumped from less than 10% to 69%. This is why CrowdStrike's adjusted subscription gross margin is nearly 80%.PubMaticAnother beaten-down high-growth stock you'll regret not buying on the dip is programmatic ad-tech company PubMatic. Shares of PubMatic are down more than 30% since November and almost 65% since hitting an all-time high in March 2021.PubMatic's sustainable growth driver is the steady shift of advertising dollars from print to various digital formats. What PubMatic's cloud-based infrastructure does is oversee the sale of digital advertising space for its clients (i.e., publishers). Interestingly, this doesn't always mean placing the highest-priced ad in a display space. Rather, PubMatic's machine-learning algorithms will aim to place relevant ads in front of users. This keeps advertisers happy and can ultimately boost the long-term ad-pricing power for PubMatic's clients over the long run.Although global digital ad spend is expected to increase by a little over 10% on an annual basis through 2024, PubMatic has been growing considerably faster.  Last year, the company's organic growth rate was 49% and was driven by mobile, video, and connected TV (CTV) programmatic ads. In fact, CTV ad revenue grew more than sixfold in the fourth quarter from the prior-year period.With PubMatic profitable on a recurring basis and forecast to grow sales by close to 25% in 2022 and 2023, it makes for the perfect stock to buy following a big dip in the Nasdaq.PayPal HoldingsA third beaten-down growth stock that's begging to be bought on this decline is fintech giant PayPal Holdings. PayPal's stock has fallen 62% since July 2021.As with CrowdStrike and PubMatic, PayPal has a no-brainer growth opportunity on its doorstep. In this instance, I'm talking about digital payments. Even with competition in the digital payments space heating up, PayPal recorded $1.25 trillion in total payment volume (TPV) in 2021 and expects TPV will climb to or beyond $1.5 trillion in 2022.What's arguably the most impressive aspect of PayPal is the growing number of payments from existing users. In 2020, there were fewer than 41 transactions per active account. Last year, this figure surpassed 45 per active account (over 19 billion transactions spanning 426 million active users).  These figures show how quickly the payments landscape is going digital.PayPal's abundant cash flow has also allowed the company to roll out new products and services. The company began allowing users to buy, hold, and sell cryptocurrencies in 2020, and is tinkering with launching a U.S. stock trading platform. It used its mountain of cash to acquire buy now, pay later solutions company Paidy last September, too.At just a hair over 20 times Wall Street's forward-year earnings forecast, PayPal is arguably the cheapest it's ever been as a public company.Upstart HoldingsThe fourth and final beaten-down growth stock you'll regret not buying on the dip is cloud-based lending platform Upstart Holdings. Shares of the company have lost three-quarters of their value since October and are down close to 55% since the Nasdaq Composite hit its all-time high.Upstart's claim to fame is the company's AI-driven lending platform. The traditional loan-vetting process can take quite a bit of time and be costly for both lending institutions and the party looking for a loan. Upstart's AI-powered platform can give on-the-spot answers (approval or denial) to roughly two-thirds of personal loan applicants. Furthermore, because the platform relies on machine learning, people who might not otherwise qualify for a loan under the traditional vetting process are sometimes approved using Upstart's process. In other words, it's democratizing access to financial services without putting lending institutions at a higher risk of loan delinquencies.Something else investors should take note of is that 94% of fourth-quarter revenue came from fees and services tied to the lending institutions it caters to. In short, there's no credit exposure or loan delinquency risk when it comes to Upstart. This means a rising-rate environment shouldn't chase investors away from this rapidly growing company.If you need one more good reason to be excited about Upstart (aside from the company crushing Wall Street's earnings expectations on a regular basis), consider its acquisition of Prodigy Software in 2021. This buyout allows Upstart to push into AI-based auto loans, which is a considerably larger addressable market than personal loans.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":12,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9026185389,"gmtCreate":1653348894241,"gmtModify":1676535263803,"author":{"id":"3554886109685293","authorId":"3554886109685293","name":"Expert126","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2d4304f2ec7fabd9d599a3ba8b2a17e0","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3554886109685293","authorIdStr":"3554886109685293"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Scary","listText":"Scary","text":"Scary","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9026185389","repostId":"2237369545","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2237369545","pubTimestamp":1653347322,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2237369545?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-05-24 07:08","market":"us","language":"en","title":"After-Hours Stock Movers: Snap's Warning Sends Shivers Throughout Tech; Zoom Gains on Results","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2237369545","media":"StreetInsider","summary":"After-Hours Stock Movers:Snap 30% LOWER; warns for Q2. The company said since they issued guidance o","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>After-Hours Stock Movers:</b></p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SNAP\">Snap</a> 30% LOWER; warns for Q2. The company said since they issued guidance on April 21, 2022, the macroeconomic environment has deteriorated further and faster than anticipated. As a result, we believe it is likely that we will report revenue and adjusted EBITDA below the low end of our Q2 2022 guidance range.</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/INMB\">INmune Bio, Inc.</a> 22% LOWER; announced that on May 20, 2022, the Company was informed via e-mail communication from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) requesting additional information around Chemistry Manufacturing and Controls (CMC) of the newly manufactured XPro1595 (XPro™). As part of the communication, the Agency placed the Company’s Investigational New Drug (IND) application to initiate its Phase 2 clinical trial of XPro™ in patients with Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) in the U.S. on clinical hold. The FDA indicated they will provide an official clinical hold letter to INmune in approximately 30 days. INmune plans to provide additional updates pending discussion with the FDA. The Phase 2 trial of XPro™ remains open in Australia and continues to enroll patients.</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NLS\">Nautilus</a> 20% LOWER; reported Q4 EPS of ($0.58), in-line with the analyst estimate of ($0.58). Revenue for the quarter came in at $119.7 million versus the consensus estimate of $120.85 million.</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PINS\">Pinterest, Inc.</a> 12% LOWER; falls on Snap&#39;s Q2 warning.</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FB\">Meta Platforms</a> 7% LOWER; falls on Snap&#39;s Q2 warning.</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ZM\">Zoom</a> 5% HIGHER; reported Q1 EPS of $1.03, $0.16 better than the analyst estimate of $0.87. Revenue for the quarter came in at $1.07 billion versus the consensus estimate of $1.07 billion. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ZM\">Zoom</a> sees Q2 2023 EPS of $0.90-$0.92, versus the consensus of $0.88. Zoom sees Q2 2023 revenue of $1.115-1.12 billion, versus the consensus of $1.11 billion. Zoom sees FY2023 EPS of $3.70-$3.77, versus the consensus of $3.53. Zoom sees FY2023 revenue of $4.53-4.55 billion, versus the consensus of $4.55 billion.</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GOOGL\">Google</a> 4% LOWER; falls on Snap&#39;s Q2 warning.</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TWTR\">Twitter</a> 4% LOWER; falls on Snap&#39;s Q2 warning.</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ALB\">Albemarle</a> Corporation 3% HIGHER; further revised its full-year 2022 guidance today, reflecting mainly the completion of additional lithium contract renegotiations with its lithium customers following its Q1/22 earnings release on May 4, 2022. Net sales are now expected to be in the range of $5.8 - $6.2 billion versus the prior outlook of $5.2 - $5.6 billion and the consensus of $5.44 billion. Adjusted EBITDA is now seen in the range of $2.2 - $2.5 billion versus the prior guidance of $1.7 - $2.0 billion. Adjusted diluted EPS in the range of $12.30 - $15.00 versus the consensus of $10.88 and prior guidance of $9.25 - $12.25.</p></body></html>","source":"highlight_streetinsider","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>After-Hours Stock Movers: Snap's Warning Sends Shivers Throughout Tech; Zoom Gains on Results</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAfter-Hours Stock Movers: Snap's Warning Sends Shivers Throughout Tech; Zoom Gains on Results\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-05-24 07:08 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.streetinsider.com/dr/news.php?id=20118094><strong>StreetInsider</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>After-Hours Stock Movers:Snap 30% LOWER; warns for Q2. The company said since they issued guidance on April 21, 2022, the macroeconomic environment has deteriorated further and faster than anticipated...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.streetinsider.com/dr/news.php?id=20118094\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"GOOGL":"谷歌A","TWTR":"Twitter","SNAP":"Snap Inc","ZM":"Zoom"},"source_url":"https://www.streetinsider.com/dr/news.php?id=20118094","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2237369545","content_text":"After-Hours Stock Movers:Snap 30% LOWER; warns for Q2. The company said since they issued guidance on April 21, 2022, the macroeconomic environment has deteriorated further and faster than anticipated. As a result, we believe it is likely that we will report revenue and adjusted EBITDA below the low end of our Q2 2022 guidance range.INmune Bio, Inc. 22% LOWER; announced that on May 20, 2022, the Company was informed via e-mail communication from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) requesting additional information around Chemistry Manufacturing and Controls (CMC) of the newly manufactured XPro1595 (XPro™). As part of the communication, the Agency placed the Company’s Investigational New Drug (IND) application to initiate its Phase 2 clinical trial of XPro™ in patients with Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) in the U.S. on clinical hold. The FDA indicated they will provide an official clinical hold letter to INmune in approximately 30 days. INmune plans to provide additional updates pending discussion with the FDA. The Phase 2 trial of XPro™ remains open in Australia and continues to enroll patients.Nautilus 20% LOWER; reported Q4 EPS of ($0.58), in-line with the analyst estimate of ($0.58). Revenue for the quarter came in at $119.7 million versus the consensus estimate of $120.85 million.Pinterest, Inc. 12% LOWER; falls on Snap's Q2 warning.Meta Platforms 7% LOWER; falls on Snap's Q2 warning.Zoom 5% HIGHER; reported Q1 EPS of $1.03, $0.16 better than the analyst estimate of $0.87. Revenue for the quarter came in at $1.07 billion versus the consensus estimate of $1.07 billion. Zoom sees Q2 2023 EPS of $0.90-$0.92, versus the consensus of $0.88. Zoom sees Q2 2023 revenue of $1.115-1.12 billion, versus the consensus of $1.11 billion. Zoom sees FY2023 EPS of $3.70-$3.77, versus the consensus of $3.53. Zoom sees FY2023 revenue of $4.53-4.55 billion, versus the consensus of $4.55 billion.Google 4% LOWER; falls on Snap's Q2 warning.Twitter 4% LOWER; falls on Snap's Q2 warning.Albemarle Corporation 3% HIGHER; further revised its full-year 2022 guidance today, reflecting mainly the completion of additional lithium contract renegotiations with its lithium customers following its Q1/22 earnings release on May 4, 2022. Net sales are now expected to be in the range of $5.8 - $6.2 billion versus the prior outlook of $5.2 - $5.6 billion and the consensus of $5.44 billion. Adjusted EBITDA is now seen in the range of $2.2 - $2.5 billion versus the prior guidance of $1.7 - $2.0 billion. Adjusted diluted EPS in the range of $12.30 - $15.00 versus the consensus of $10.88 and prior guidance of $9.25 - $12.25.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":87,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9031795637,"gmtCreate":1646663960769,"gmtModify":1676534148089,"author":{"id":"3554886109685293","authorId":"3554886109685293","name":"Expert126","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2d4304f2ec7fabd9d599a3ba8b2a17e0","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3554886109685293","authorIdStr":"3554886109685293"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Nice","listText":"Nice","text":"Nice","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9031795637","repostId":"1138114099","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1138114099","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1646663789,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1138114099?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-03-07 22:36","market":"us","language":"en","title":"EV Stocks Jumped in Morning Trading","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1138114099","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"EV stocks jumped in morning trading. Tesla, Rivian, Lucid, Nio, LI Auto, Lordstown, Nikola, TuSimple","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>EV stocks jumped in morning trading. Tesla, Rivian, Lucid, Nio, LI Auto, Lordstown, Nikola, TuSimple, Canoo and Fisker rose between 1% and 6%.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/07fa46d397746b5f87b1367607c9d640\" tg-width=\"335\" tg-height=\"523\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>EV Stocks Jumped in Morning Trading</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nEV Stocks Jumped in Morning Trading\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-03-07 22:36</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>EV stocks jumped in morning trading. Tesla, Rivian, Lucid, Nio, LI Auto, Lordstown, Nikola, TuSimple, Canoo and Fisker rose between 1% and 6%.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/07fa46d397746b5f87b1367607c9d640\" tg-width=\"335\" tg-height=\"523\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉","NIO":"蔚来"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1138114099","content_text":"EV stocks jumped in morning trading. Tesla, Rivian, Lucid, Nio, LI Auto, Lordstown, Nikola, TuSimple, Canoo and Fisker rose between 1% and 6%.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":84,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9098769639,"gmtCreate":1644234804429,"gmtModify":1676533902276,"author":{"id":"3554886109685293","authorId":"3554886109685293","name":"Expert126","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2d4304f2ec7fabd9d599a3ba8b2a17e0","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3554886109685293","authorIdStr":"3554886109685293"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9098769639","repostId":"1125895947","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1125895947","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1644234084,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1125895947?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-02-07 19:41","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Frontier Airlines Dropped over 2% in Premarket Trading","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1125895947","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Frontier airlines dropped over 2% in premarket trading with Spirit Airlines, Frontier to merger in a","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Frontier airlines dropped over 2% in premarket trading with Spirit Airlines, Frontier to merger in a deal valued at $6.6 bln.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fe1b3d5a7be482bdc69c1beedf1edab0\" tg-width=\"1122\" tg-height=\"777\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/>Frontier Group Holdings, Inc., parent company of Frontier Airlines, Inc. (NASDAQ: ULCC), today reported its fourth quarter and full year 2021 financial results.</p><p>Frontier ended 2021 with a total fleet of 110 aircraft, which is six percent higher than the corresponding prior year period and 12 percent higher than the comparable pre-COVID quarter in 2019. Frontier&#39;s fleet continues to be the most fuel-efficient of all major U.S. carriers when measured by ASMs per fuel gallon consumed, generating over 100 ASMs per gallon during the fourth quarter and the full year 2021, representing Frontier&#39;s commitment to continued fuel efficiency as the airline grows.</p><p>On November 13, 2021, Frontier executed an order of 91 additional A321neo aircraft that are scheduled for delivery between 2023 and 2029. These aircraft commitments will enable the airline to significantly increase in size by 2029 while advancing its industry-leading environmental efforts and fuel-efficiency advantage.</p><p>Frontier&#39;s capacity, measured by ASMs, was four percent higher in the fourth quarter compared to the corresponding 2019 quarter. Frontier continued its domestic and international expansion, opening four new stations and operating an average of over 450 flights per day. This was ten percent higher than the comparable 2019 quarter.</p><p>Total revenue per passenger in the fourth quarter was approximately $103. Of this amount, ancillary revenue was $63 per passenger, eight percent higher than the comparable 2019 quarter, supported by the economic recovery and the Company&#39;s innovative product offerings. Full year 2021 ancillary revenue per passenger was approximately $61, six percent higher than 2019. Despite the impact of the Delta and Omicron variants, and rising fuel prices, management remained financially disciplined and the Company ended the year in a strong financial position.</p><p>“Through out 2021, Frontier displayed its operational and financial resiliency notwithstanding the persistent challenges from COVID-19 variants,” commented Barry Biffle, president and CEO. “During the fourth quarter, we increased our capacity, departures, fuel efficiency and level of ancillary revenue per passenger versus the comparable pre-COVID period. We continue to view the impact of COVID-19 as transient, and remain focused on getting the airline back to full utilization in 2022 while being nimble to counter any further COVID-19 impacts. I want to thank Team Frontier for providing safe and dependable travel to our valued customers, all while fulfilling our ‘Low Fares Done Right’ commitment.”</p><p><b>Fleet</b></p><p>As of December 31, 2021, Frontier had a fleet of 110 Airbus single-aisle aircraft, consisting of 73 A320neos, 21 A321ceos and 16 A320ceos. All aircraft in the fleet are financed with operating leases that expire between 2022 and 2033. Frontier’s fleet is the most fuel-efficient of all major U.S. carriers when measured by ASMs per fuel gallon consumed. This fuel efficiency reflects Frontier’s operation of a large number of aircraft with new generation, fuel-efficient engines, lightweight seats, and an efficient seating layout.</p><p>Frontier completed an order of 91 additional A321neo aircraft in November 2021 that are scheduled for delivery between 2023 and 2029. These aircraft commitments bring the Company&#39;s total aircraft order as of December 31, 2021 to 234 aircraft to be delivered through 2029, including 76 A320neo aircraft and 158 A321neo aircraft. These aircraft commitments will enable the Company to significantly increase in size by 2029. In addition, the entry into service of the A321neo aircraft in the second half of 2022 will advance Frontier&#39;s structural advantage in fuel and operating expense efficiency versus the industry.</p><p><b>Guidance</b></p><p>In consideration of the anticipated merger with Spirit Airlines, Inc. which was also announced today, the Company will not provide guidance for the first quarter or full year 2022 at this time.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Frontier Airlines Dropped over 2% in Premarket Trading</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFrontier Airlines Dropped over 2% in Premarket Trading\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-02-07 19:41</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>Frontier airlines dropped over 2% in premarket trading with Spirit Airlines, Frontier to merger in a deal valued at $6.6 bln.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fe1b3d5a7be482bdc69c1beedf1edab0\" tg-width=\"1122\" tg-height=\"777\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/>Frontier Group Holdings, Inc., parent company of Frontier Airlines, Inc. (NASDAQ: ULCC), today reported its fourth quarter and full year 2021 financial results.</p><p>Frontier ended 2021 with a total fleet of 110 aircraft, which is six percent higher than the corresponding prior year period and 12 percent higher than the comparable pre-COVID quarter in 2019. Frontier&#39;s fleet continues to be the most fuel-efficient of all major U.S. carriers when measured by ASMs per fuel gallon consumed, generating over 100 ASMs per gallon during the fourth quarter and the full year 2021, representing Frontier&#39;s commitment to continued fuel efficiency as the airline grows.</p><p>On November 13, 2021, Frontier executed an order of 91 additional A321neo aircraft that are scheduled for delivery between 2023 and 2029. These aircraft commitments will enable the airline to significantly increase in size by 2029 while advancing its industry-leading environmental efforts and fuel-efficiency advantage.</p><p>Frontier&#39;s capacity, measured by ASMs, was four percent higher in the fourth quarter compared to the corresponding 2019 quarter. Frontier continued its domestic and international expansion, opening four new stations and operating an average of over 450 flights per day. This was ten percent higher than the comparable 2019 quarter.</p><p>Total revenue per passenger in the fourth quarter was approximately $103. Of this amount, ancillary revenue was $63 per passenger, eight percent higher than the comparable 2019 quarter, supported by the economic recovery and the Company&#39;s innovative product offerings. Full year 2021 ancillary revenue per passenger was approximately $61, six percent higher than 2019. Despite the impact of the Delta and Omicron variants, and rising fuel prices, management remained financially disciplined and the Company ended the year in a strong financial position.</p><p>“Through out 2021, Frontier displayed its operational and financial resiliency notwithstanding the persistent challenges from COVID-19 variants,” commented Barry Biffle, president and CEO. “During the fourth quarter, we increased our capacity, departures, fuel efficiency and level of ancillary revenue per passenger versus the comparable pre-COVID period. We continue to view the impact of COVID-19 as transient, and remain focused on getting the airline back to full utilization in 2022 while being nimble to counter any further COVID-19 impacts. I want to thank Team Frontier for providing safe and dependable travel to our valued customers, all while fulfilling our ‘Low Fares Done Right’ commitment.”</p><p><b>Fleet</b></p><p>As of December 31, 2021, Frontier had a fleet of 110 Airbus single-aisle aircraft, consisting of 73 A320neos, 21 A321ceos and 16 A320ceos. All aircraft in the fleet are financed with operating leases that expire between 2022 and 2033. Frontier’s fleet is the most fuel-efficient of all major U.S. carriers when measured by ASMs per fuel gallon consumed. This fuel efficiency reflects Frontier’s operation of a large number of aircraft with new generation, fuel-efficient engines, lightweight seats, and an efficient seating layout.</p><p>Frontier completed an order of 91 additional A321neo aircraft in November 2021 that are scheduled for delivery between 2023 and 2029. These aircraft commitments bring the Company&#39;s total aircraft order as of December 31, 2021 to 234 aircraft to be delivered through 2029, including 76 A320neo aircraft and 158 A321neo aircraft. These aircraft commitments will enable the Company to significantly increase in size by 2029. In addition, the entry into service of the A321neo aircraft in the second half of 2022 will advance Frontier&#39;s structural advantage in fuel and operating expense efficiency versus the industry.</p><p><b>Guidance</b></p><p>In consideration of the anticipated merger with Spirit Airlines, Inc. which was also announced today, the Company will not provide guidance for the first quarter or full year 2022 at this time.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"ULCC":"Frontier Group Holdings, Inc."},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1125895947","content_text":"Frontier airlines dropped over 2% in premarket trading with Spirit Airlines, Frontier to merger in a deal valued at $6.6 bln.Frontier Group Holdings, Inc., parent company of Frontier Airlines, Inc. (NASDAQ: ULCC), today reported its fourth quarter and full year 2021 financial results.Frontier ended 2021 with a total fleet of 110 aircraft, which is six percent higher than the corresponding prior year period and 12 percent higher than the comparable pre-COVID quarter in 2019. Frontier's fleet continues to be the most fuel-efficient of all major U.S. carriers when measured by ASMs per fuel gallon consumed, generating over 100 ASMs per gallon during the fourth quarter and the full year 2021, representing Frontier's commitment to continued fuel efficiency as the airline grows.On November 13, 2021, Frontier executed an order of 91 additional A321neo aircraft that are scheduled for delivery between 2023 and 2029. These aircraft commitments will enable the airline to significantly increase in size by 2029 while advancing its industry-leading environmental efforts and fuel-efficiency advantage.Frontier's capacity, measured by ASMs, was four percent higher in the fourth quarter compared to the corresponding 2019 quarter. Frontier continued its domestic and international expansion, opening four new stations and operating an average of over 450 flights per day. This was ten percent higher than the comparable 2019 quarter.Total revenue per passenger in the fourth quarter was approximately $103. Of this amount, ancillary revenue was $63 per passenger, eight percent higher than the comparable 2019 quarter, supported by the economic recovery and the Company's innovative product offerings. Full year 2021 ancillary revenue per passenger was approximately $61, six percent higher than 2019. Despite the impact of the Delta and Omicron variants, and rising fuel prices, management remained financially disciplined and the Company ended the year in a strong financial position.“Through out 2021, Frontier displayed its operational and financial resiliency notwithstanding the persistent challenges from COVID-19 variants,” commented Barry Biffle, president and CEO. “During the fourth quarter, we increased our capacity, departures, fuel efficiency and level of ancillary revenue per passenger versus the comparable pre-COVID period. We continue to view the impact of COVID-19 as transient, and remain focused on getting the airline back to full utilization in 2022 while being nimble to counter any further COVID-19 impacts. I want to thank Team Frontier for providing safe and dependable travel to our valued customers, all while fulfilling our ‘Low Fares Done Right’ commitment.”FleetAs of December 31, 2021, Frontier had a fleet of 110 Airbus single-aisle aircraft, consisting of 73 A320neos, 21 A321ceos and 16 A320ceos. All aircraft in the fleet are financed with operating leases that expire between 2022 and 2033. Frontier’s fleet is the most fuel-efficient of all major U.S. carriers when measured by ASMs per fuel gallon consumed. This fuel efficiency reflects Frontier’s operation of a large number of aircraft with new generation, fuel-efficient engines, lightweight seats, and an efficient seating layout.Frontier completed an order of 91 additional A321neo aircraft in November 2021 that are scheduled for delivery between 2023 and 2029. These aircraft commitments bring the Company's total aircraft order as of December 31, 2021 to 234 aircraft to be delivered through 2029, including 76 A320neo aircraft and 158 A321neo aircraft. These aircraft commitments will enable the Company to significantly increase in size by 2029. In addition, the entry into service of the A321neo aircraft in the second half of 2022 will advance Frontier's structural advantage in fuel and operating expense efficiency versus the industry.GuidanceIn consideration of the anticipated merger with Spirit Airlines, Inc. which was also announced today, the Company will not provide guidance for the first quarter or full year 2022 at this time.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":30,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9093129437,"gmtCreate":1643560017440,"gmtModify":1676533831324,"author":{"id":"3554886109685293","authorId":"3554886109685293","name":"Expert126","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2d4304f2ec7fabd9d599a3ba8b2a17e0","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3554886109685293","authorIdStr":"3554886109685293"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Okok","listText":"Okok","text":"Okok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9093129437","repostId":"2207801369","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2207801369","pubTimestamp":1643524910,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2207801369?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-01-30 14:41","market":"us","language":"en","title":"This 3.8%-Yielding Dividend Stock Has Lots of Growth Ahead","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2207801369","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"The income-producing clean energy company continues to make progress on its growth plan.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NEP\"><b>NextEra Energy Partners</b> </a> continues to deliver high-powered dividend growth. The clean energy infrastructure company increased its dividend by 15% last year, boosting the yield to nearly 3.8%. That helped power 30% total returns last year, bringing its two-year total to more than 72%.</p><p>The company has plenty of fuel to continue growing, which was one of the key takeaways from its recent fourth-quarter report. Here&#39;s a look at those numbers and what&#39;s ahead for the clean energy company.</p><h2>Another strong year</h2><p>NextEra Energy Partners generated $1.36 billion of adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) last year along with $584 million in cash available for distribution (CAFD), up 7.7% and 2.5%, respectively. The main EBITDA driver was the impact of new projects added to the portfolio in the past year. Those new additions and lower corporate interest expenses helped power CAFD growth.</p><p>Those results don&#39;t reflect the full impact of the company&#39;s earnings potential due to the timing of when it closed acquisitions last year. Its year-end portfolio&#39;s adjusted EBITDA run rate was between $1.635 billion and $1.795 billion, 26.1% higher than its 2021 full-year tally at the midpoint. Meanwhile, the portfolio&#39;s CAFD run rate was $640 million to $775 million, 16.4% above its 2021 total at the midpoint.</p><p>Last year, NextEra Energy Partners acquired about 1.9 gigawatts (GW) of renewable energy and storage assets from its sponsor, utility <b>NextEra Energy</b> (NYSE:NEE). In addition, it purchased about 500 megawatts (MW) of wind energy projects in two transactions with third-party sellers. These deals helped drive last year&#39;s earnings and CAFD growth while setting the stage for continued growth in 2022.</p><h2>Adding more power to the dividend growth engine</h2><p>The clean energy company continued to secure additional growth during the fourth quarter. In November, it exercised its right to purchase 100% of the outstanding minority equity interests in a portfolio of wind and solar assets supporting its 2018 convertible equity portfolio financing (CEPF) with a private equity fund. It paid $885 million in cash-and-stock to acquire these interests.</p><p>The company also secured additional low-cost financing during the quarter. It closed a new 10-year, $820 million CEPF to help support the acquisition of a 50% interest in 2.52 GW of renewable energy projects and 115 MW of storage assets from NextEra.</p><p>These deals enhanced the company&#39;s 2022 growth outlook. It currently expects to end the year with an EBITDA run-rate between $1.775 billion and $1.975 billion and a CAFD run-rate of $675 million to $765 million. That implies growth at the midpoint of 9.3% for EBITDA and 5.9% for CAFD.</p><p>This forecast supports NextEra Energy Partners&#39; view that it can grow its dividend by another 12% to 15% this year while maintaining a dividend payout ratio in the low-80% range. Meanwhile, it believes it can continue growing the dividend at the pace through at least 2024.</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TWOA.U\">Two</a> factors support that longer-term dividend growth forecast. First, it has an abundance of acquisition opportunities. NextEra Energy alone has a vast portfolio of clean energy assets it can drop down to the partnership to help fund its extensive development pipeline. In addition, NextEra Energy Partners can purchase additional assets from third-party sellers. Meanwhile, the company continues to secure attractive financing to support its growth. Institutional investors like private equity funds continue to provide low-cost CEPF vehicles to close acquisitions. That enables the company to time the market to issue equity and retire this funding with less dilution to existing investors.</p><h2>A powerful dividend growth stock</h2><p>NextEra Energy Partners continues to offer investors the best of both worlds: income and growth. That makes it an excellent option for investors seeking a fast-rising passive income stream powered by clean energy.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>This 3.8%-Yielding Dividend Stock Has Lots of Growth Ahead</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nThis 3.8%-Yielding Dividend Stock Has Lots of Growth Ahead\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-01-30 14:41 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/01/29/this-38-yielding-dividend-stock-has-lots-of-growth/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>NextEra Energy Partners  continues to deliver high-powered dividend growth. The clean energy infrastructure company increased its dividend by 15% last year, boosting the yield to nearly 3.8%. That ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/01/29/this-38-yielding-dividend-stock-has-lots-of-growth/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BK4133":"新能源发电业者","NEP":"Nextera Energy Partners","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","BK4081":"电力公用事业","NEE":"新纪元能源","BK4533":"AQR资本管理(全球第二大对冲基金)","BK4566":"资本集团"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/01/29/this-38-yielding-dividend-stock-has-lots-of-growth/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2207801369","content_text":"NextEra Energy Partners  continues to deliver high-powered dividend growth. The clean energy infrastructure company increased its dividend by 15% last year, boosting the yield to nearly 3.8%. That helped power 30% total returns last year, bringing its two-year total to more than 72%.The company has plenty of fuel to continue growing, which was one of the key takeaways from its recent fourth-quarter report. Here's a look at those numbers and what's ahead for the clean energy company.Another strong yearNextEra Energy Partners generated $1.36 billion of adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) last year along with $584 million in cash available for distribution (CAFD), up 7.7% and 2.5%, respectively. The main EBITDA driver was the impact of new projects added to the portfolio in the past year. Those new additions and lower corporate interest expenses helped power CAFD growth.Those results don't reflect the full impact of the company's earnings potential due to the timing of when it closed acquisitions last year. Its year-end portfolio's adjusted EBITDA run rate was between $1.635 billion and $1.795 billion, 26.1% higher than its 2021 full-year tally at the midpoint. Meanwhile, the portfolio's CAFD run rate was $640 million to $775 million, 16.4% above its 2021 total at the midpoint.Last year, NextEra Energy Partners acquired about 1.9 gigawatts (GW) of renewable energy and storage assets from its sponsor, utility NextEra Energy (NYSE:NEE). In addition, it purchased about 500 megawatts (MW) of wind energy projects in two transactions with third-party sellers. These deals helped drive last year's earnings and CAFD growth while setting the stage for continued growth in 2022.Adding more power to the dividend growth engineThe clean energy company continued to secure additional growth during the fourth quarter. In November, it exercised its right to purchase 100% of the outstanding minority equity interests in a portfolio of wind and solar assets supporting its 2018 convertible equity portfolio financing (CEPF) with a private equity fund. It paid $885 million in cash-and-stock to acquire these interests.The company also secured additional low-cost financing during the quarter. It closed a new 10-year, $820 million CEPF to help support the acquisition of a 50% interest in 2.52 GW of renewable energy projects and 115 MW of storage assets from NextEra.These deals enhanced the company's 2022 growth outlook. It currently expects to end the year with an EBITDA run-rate between $1.775 billion and $1.975 billion and a CAFD run-rate of $675 million to $765 million. That implies growth at the midpoint of 9.3% for EBITDA and 5.9% for CAFD.This forecast supports NextEra Energy Partners' view that it can grow its dividend by another 12% to 15% this year while maintaining a dividend payout ratio in the low-80% range. Meanwhile, it believes it can continue growing the dividend at the pace through at least 2024.Two factors support that longer-term dividend growth forecast. First, it has an abundance of acquisition opportunities. NextEra Energy alone has a vast portfolio of clean energy assets it can drop down to the partnership to help fund its extensive development pipeline. In addition, NextEra Energy Partners can purchase additional assets from third-party sellers. Meanwhile, the company continues to secure attractive financing to support its growth. Institutional investors like private equity funds continue to provide low-cost CEPF vehicles to close acquisitions. That enables the company to time the market to issue equity and retire this funding with less dilution to existing investors.A powerful dividend growth stockNextEra Energy Partners continues to offer investors the best of both worlds: income and growth. That makes it an excellent option for investors seeking a fast-rising passive income stream powered by clean energy.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":93,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9002647532,"gmtCreate":1642003716453,"gmtModify":1676533670980,"author":{"id":"3554886109685293","authorId":"3554886109685293","name":"Expert126","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2d4304f2ec7fabd9d599a3ba8b2a17e0","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3554886109685293","authorIdStr":"3554886109685293"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Lol","listText":"Lol","text":"Lol","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9002647532","repostId":"1114732808","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1114732808","pubTimestamp":1641995536,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1114732808?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-01-12 21:52","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Palantir: Worth $10, But I'll Buy At $15","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1114732808","media":"seekingalpha","summary":"SummaryPalantir's share price has fallen over 30% in the last 6 months, but fundamentals look strong","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>Summary</b></p><ul><li>Palantir&#39;s share price has fallen over 30% in the last 6 months, but fundamentals look stronger than ever.</li><li>I see improved profitability in the future and a service that competitors will struggle to replicate.</li><li>Macro headwinds are a challenge, but just.</li><li>At worst, Palantir is worth $10, but I&#39;d definitely add at $15. There&#39;s still plenty of room for the company to surprise investors.</li></ul><p><b>Thesis Summary</b></p><p>Palantir’s(NYSE:PLTR)share price has fallen nearly 30% in the last six months amid a broader tech selloff. Bears have come out of the cave, with some going as far as declaring that the company is worth as little as $5 share.</p><p>Granted, the company has its problems, but it is still a pioneering company in a growing sector. Unlike the naysayers, I do believe that Palantir has a moat and I see evidence that it could achieve higher profitability as it scales.</p><p>What is Palantir’s “fair value”? Being conservative, I could go as low as $10/share, but the market won’t take it that low. At $15, this is a screaming buy due to its long-term potential. Growth in the private sector will be the definitive trend to watch for in the next decade.</p><p><b>Palantir does have a moat (for now)</b></p><p>One of the biggest areas of debate surrounding Palantir is the existence or lack of a “moat” around its business. When it comes to technology like AI, it can be hard for investors to understand just how “unique” a certain technology is.</p><p>Palantir offers Foundry for enterprises and Gotham for governments, which is an AI data analytics tool. Used in the right way and by the right people, it can be used to seamlessly sift through data and find patterns or trends that could potentially do anything from stopping a terrorist attack to optimizing supply chains.</p><p>Is this software unique? There are a lot of other companies in the lucrative space of data analytics, but few that have the capabilities of Palantir. Evidence of this, of course, is the large presence the company has achieved in the public sector. However, what is also misunderstood by many is that Palantir has amassed some of the best talent in the industry.</p><p>It is this combination of talent, which comes at the price of stock-based compensation, and a top of line software/AI, which give Palantir its moat.</p><p><b>Economies of scale are happening</b></p><p>The other main issue that people have with Palantir, is profitability. The company is losing cash every year and funding its operations through stock dilution. However, what people fail to see is that Palantir is funding growth and expansion. If the company wanted to, I believe it could indeed turn a profit as soon as next year. After all, the company has a levered FCF margin of around 35%.</p><p>But profitability isn’t what the company wants, as it is trying to grow revenues and expand. Having said that, for those that believe profitability is a pipedream, I found the most encouraging evidence of economies of scale in the latest earnings call presentation.During the Q&amp;A section, a very interesting point was made regarding the different modules that the company has been able to create for Foundry. In short, Palantir has been able to create specialized versions of Foundry which can be used for specific situations/industries. In other words, the company has been able to standardize its work to a degree. The data problems that one company faces, aren’t unique and from what I gather, Palantir can now deploy previously created modules to solve similar problems while decreasing the workload and deployment time.</p><p><b>How much is Palantir worth now and in the future?</b></p><p>With all of the above said, Palantir doesn’t seem to me like bad company. But is the valuation stretched? That depends on what multiples the market assigns, the actual growth rates, and the level of dilution we see moving forward.</p><p>In a previous article, I forecasted the revenue growth of Palantir based on current trends and estimates, and also looked at a possible trajectory for the overall share growth based on financing needs and balance sheet structure.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4f751d9a2d6909956f9ca75d692d1eb3\" tg-width=\"717\" tg-height=\"261\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>Palantir Growth</span></p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4d3c17b0966870585d0f4bc51a488ddb\" tg-width=\"728\" tg-height=\"759\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>Palantir Shares</span></p><p>The projections for 2021 are on the higher side, but the growth fits the overall narrative of the company of going from a 40% growth rate to a stabilized 30% CAGR over the next decade. Also, bear in mind Palantir has typically beaten its revenue forecasts.</p><p>With this revenue and share count, we can easily calculate a target share price, all we need is to assign a P/S multiple.</p><p>In 2021, Palantir has traded at a P/S of around 20 and as high as 30. While I agree that this is on the higher end of the spectrum, it is much more reasonable than assigning a P/S of 5. I would argue the best way to find a reasonable ratio, is to find a comparable company, and I’d say Splunk Inc(NASDAQ:SPLK)is a good start. Splunk, like Palantir, is in the data business, it has similar margins and even a presence in the public sector, making it a close competitor to Palantir.</p><p>Splunk currently has a P/S of around 7.6, but it has also grown revenues at only 10% in the last year, far below Palantir’s 43% growth rate. With this in mind, I could easily justify Palantir having a P/S of 15. Even if you believe both Palantir and Splunk are due for further multiple contractions I think a P/S of 10 for Palantir is as low as the market will go. With that said, I’ll establish a price range using a P/S of 10-15 and using my forecasts for 2022 and 2025.</p><p>Therefore, my price target for 2022 based on P/S would be $11.5-$15.2. By 2025, at the same P/S, the shares would be worth between $24.6-$37. Bear in mind this implies a significant multiple contraction compared to what we have seen in 2021.</p><p><b>Other considerations</b></p><p>I think $10 is a floor that Palantir won’t break. I’d be happy to scoop up those shares at that price, and even at $15. Palantir is well-positioned for long-term growth, and it could pleasantly surprise investors, especially if it can make more inroads in the private sector. For now, indeed, unprofitable companies like Palantir are not fashionable, due to the idea that the Fed will be raising rates “soon”. This is yet to be seen.</p><p>As I’ve mentioned before, inflation will struggle to remain high while money velocity is trending lower. Could we have already seen the highest levels of inflation? Without direct fiscal stimulus (literally sending people money) inflation won’t persist, and without inflation low rates, cheap money and high growth will remain good investments.</p><p><b>Takeaway</b></p><p>Certainly, anything could happen, and it’s important to have a diversified portfolio of companies, but at these prices, Palantir offers limited downside while holding the potential to surprise investors in the next few months and even years.</p></body></html>","source":"seekingalpha","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Palantir: Worth $10, But I'll Buy At $15</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nPalantir: Worth $10, But I'll Buy At $15\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-01-12 21:52 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4479204-palantir-stock-worth-10-dollars-buy-at-15><strong>seekingalpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>SummaryPalantir's share price has fallen over 30% in the last 6 months, but fundamentals look stronger than ever.I see improved profitability in the future and a service that competitors will struggle...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4479204-palantir-stock-worth-10-dollars-buy-at-15\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"PLTR":"Palantir Technologies Inc."},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4479204-palantir-stock-worth-10-dollars-buy-at-15","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5a36db9d73b4222bc376d24ccc48c8a4","article_id":"1114732808","content_text":"SummaryPalantir's share price has fallen over 30% in the last 6 months, but fundamentals look stronger than ever.I see improved profitability in the future and a service that competitors will struggle to replicate.Macro headwinds are a challenge, but just.At worst, Palantir is worth $10, but I'd definitely add at $15. There's still plenty of room for the company to surprise investors.Thesis SummaryPalantir’s(NYSE:PLTR)share price has fallen nearly 30% in the last six months amid a broader tech selloff. Bears have come out of the cave, with some going as far as declaring that the company is worth as little as $5 share.Granted, the company has its problems, but it is still a pioneering company in a growing sector. Unlike the naysayers, I do believe that Palantir has a moat and I see evidence that it could achieve higher profitability as it scales.What is Palantir’s “fair value”? Being conservative, I could go as low as $10/share, but the market won’t take it that low. At $15, this is a screaming buy due to its long-term potential. Growth in the private sector will be the definitive trend to watch for in the next decade.Palantir does have a moat (for now)One of the biggest areas of debate surrounding Palantir is the existence or lack of a “moat” around its business. When it comes to technology like AI, it can be hard for investors to understand just how “unique” a certain technology is.Palantir offers Foundry for enterprises and Gotham for governments, which is an AI data analytics tool. Used in the right way and by the right people, it can be used to seamlessly sift through data and find patterns or trends that could potentially do anything from stopping a terrorist attack to optimizing supply chains.Is this software unique? There are a lot of other companies in the lucrative space of data analytics, but few that have the capabilities of Palantir. Evidence of this, of course, is the large presence the company has achieved in the public sector. However, what is also misunderstood by many is that Palantir has amassed some of the best talent in the industry.It is this combination of talent, which comes at the price of stock-based compensation, and a top of line software/AI, which give Palantir its moat.Economies of scale are happeningThe other main issue that people have with Palantir, is profitability. The company is losing cash every year and funding its operations through stock dilution. However, what people fail to see is that Palantir is funding growth and expansion. If the company wanted to, I believe it could indeed turn a profit as soon as next year. After all, the company has a levered FCF margin of around 35%.But profitability isn’t what the company wants, as it is trying to grow revenues and expand. Having said that, for those that believe profitability is a pipedream, I found the most encouraging evidence of economies of scale in the latest earnings call presentation.During the Q&A section, a very interesting point was made regarding the different modules that the company has been able to create for Foundry. In short, Palantir has been able to create specialized versions of Foundry which can be used for specific situations/industries. In other words, the company has been able to standardize its work to a degree. The data problems that one company faces, aren’t unique and from what I gather, Palantir can now deploy previously created modules to solve similar problems while decreasing the workload and deployment time.How much is Palantir worth now and in the future?With all of the above said, Palantir doesn’t seem to me like bad company. But is the valuation stretched? That depends on what multiples the market assigns, the actual growth rates, and the level of dilution we see moving forward.In a previous article, I forecasted the revenue growth of Palantir based on current trends and estimates, and also looked at a possible trajectory for the overall share growth based on financing needs and balance sheet structure.Palantir GrowthPalantir SharesThe projections for 2021 are on the higher side, but the growth fits the overall narrative of the company of going from a 40% growth rate to a stabilized 30% CAGR over the next decade. Also, bear in mind Palantir has typically beaten its revenue forecasts.With this revenue and share count, we can easily calculate a target share price, all we need is to assign a P/S multiple.In 2021, Palantir has traded at a P/S of around 20 and as high as 30. While I agree that this is on the higher end of the spectrum, it is much more reasonable than assigning a P/S of 5. I would argue the best way to find a reasonable ratio, is to find a comparable company, and I’d say Splunk Inc(NASDAQ:SPLK)is a good start. Splunk, like Palantir, is in the data business, it has similar margins and even a presence in the public sector, making it a close competitor to Palantir.Splunk currently has a P/S of around 7.6, but it has also grown revenues at only 10% in the last year, far below Palantir’s 43% growth rate. With this in mind, I could easily justify Palantir having a P/S of 15. Even if you believe both Palantir and Splunk are due for further multiple contractions I think a P/S of 10 for Palantir is as low as the market will go. With that said, I’ll establish a price range using a P/S of 10-15 and using my forecasts for 2022 and 2025.Therefore, my price target for 2022 based on P/S would be $11.5-$15.2. By 2025, at the same P/S, the shares would be worth between $24.6-$37. Bear in mind this implies a significant multiple contraction compared to what we have seen in 2021.Other considerationsI think $10 is a floor that Palantir won’t break. I’d be happy to scoop up those shares at that price, and even at $15. Palantir is well-positioned for long-term growth, and it could pleasantly surprise investors, especially if it can make more inroads in the private sector. For now, indeed, unprofitable companies like Palantir are not fashionable, due to the idea that the Fed will be raising rates “soon”. This is yet to be seen.As I’ve mentioned before, inflation will struggle to remain high while money velocity is trending lower. Could we have already seen the highest levels of inflation? Without direct fiscal stimulus (literally sending people money) inflation won’t persist, and without inflation low rates, cheap money and high growth will remain good investments.TakeawayCertainly, anything could happen, and it’s important to have a diversified portfolio of companies, but at these prices, Palantir offers limited downside while holding the potential to surprise investors in the next few months and even years.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":76,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9024813610,"gmtCreate":1653838135830,"gmtModify":1676535349288,"author":{"id":"3554886109685293","authorId":"3554886109685293","name":"Expert126","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2d4304f2ec7fabd9d599a3ba8b2a17e0","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3554886109685293","authorIdStr":"3554886109685293"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Okok","listText":"Okok","text":"Okok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9024813610","repostId":"2238219576","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":82,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9025767697,"gmtCreate":1653748591419,"gmtModify":1676535336187,"author":{"id":"3554886109685293","authorId":"3554886109685293","name":"Expert126","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2d4304f2ec7fabd9d599a3ba8b2a17e0","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3554886109685293","authorIdStr":"3554886109685293"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9025767697","repostId":"2238219576","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2238219576","pubTimestamp":1653811998,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2238219576?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-05-29 16:13","market":"us","language":"en","title":"These 3 Unique Stocks Have Undeniable Long-Term Upside","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2238219576","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Market drops are the best time to put money to work and juice long-term returns.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Investors always need to consider valuation as well as business potential when deciding whether to invest in a stock. When valuations are in a general decline, as they are right now, it can be a great time to dig in and look for companies that have long-term potential. Smart investors use corrections and bear markets to provide extra juice for future returns.</p><p>Technology stocks have led the decline, as their prior gains led to lofty valuation levels. But there have been meaningful drops in all sectors, and investors can use this market decline to add a diverse mix of holdings with solid businesses, despite recent stock declines.</p><p>Here are three stocks that have dropped between 25% and 35% this year but offer investors diversity and solid long-term prospects.</p><h2>Strong sales growth</h2><p>A good mix of three such businesses that should continue to have solid future growth are <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">Tesla</a>, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/HD\">Home Depot</a>, and GPS device maker <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GRMN\">Garmin</a>. When the biggest knock on a stock is its valuation, a bear market offers a chance to reevaluate whether it belongs in your portfolio.</p><p>Heading into this year, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">Tesla</a> shares returned more than 1,000% over the prior two and a half years. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/HD\">Home Depot</a> gained about 120% in that time, pushing the valuations of both stocks ahead of the businesses themselves. In some environments, that&#39;s OK, and the business results will catch up quickly.</p><p>But in the current environment, the stocks started to correct as supply chain challenges, the onset of inflation, and rising interest rates raised questions about business results in the near-term future. But in the longer term, sales growth should continue for these companies.</p><p>Tesla believes rising demand, and its two new manufacturing plants that opened this year in Texas and Germany, will help it achieve 50% annual sales growth for several more years. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GRMN\">Garmin</a> has been riding a long-term wave of growing interest in outdoor activities. Sales of its popular GPS-enabled products rose 19% in 2021, capping off six straight years of increasing revenue. And Home Depot has also worked to increase its revenue by 50% over the past five years.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/10d69d97c1de3f246ec652769b88ea4f\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"387\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>HD Revenue (Annual) data by YCharts</p><h2>Falling to the bottom line</h2><p>Much of that revenue for all three companies is also reaching the bottom line. Tesla stands out among automakers with an impressive operating margin of 19.2% in the first quarter. When looked at on a trailing 12-month (TTM) basis, the improvement seems even more impressive, and is more than twice what traditional automakers like <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GM\">General Motors</a> and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/F\">Ford</a> have been able to achieve over the last several years.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0917d4c877622aa36563adf987cb27ce\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"387\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>TSLA Operating Margin (TTM) data by YCharts</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GRMN\">Garmin</a>&#39;s profitability is even more impressive, as it has steadily achieved gross margins approaching 60%, and operating margins have been hovering around 25% over the past two years.</p><h2>Why invest now?</h2><p>Whether to invest in these businesses now still should be determined by what looks to come ahead, not from past performance. But all three look to continue their recent success. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GRMN\">Garmin</a> grew revenue 9% in the first quarter, and maintains its estimate for more than a 10% increase for the full year versus 2021. Management also showed its confidence by announcing a newly authorized $300 million share repurchase plan. The share buyback would be the first in four years and complements a reliable dividend that recently yielded 2.6%.</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/HD\">Home Depot</a> initiated a multiyear investment program in 2017 that has helped its digital sales soar. But the One Home Depot plan also now focuses on growing its professionals business. Increasing that customer base helped its average sales ticket grow by 11.4% in the first quarter versus the prior-year period. The company expects that improvement to continue.</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">Tesla</a>&#39;s astounding sales growth doesn&#39;t make the stock cheap by traditional valuation metrics. Even after its recent drop, Tesla shares trade at a sky-high price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 133 based on 2021 earnings. But if sales continue to soar 50% annually as expected, that will continue to move down. That will take some time, however, and is another reason that these are being looked at as investments for the long haul. That valuation may mean limited upside in Tesla shares for a few years.</p><p>But that&#39;s how retirement savings should be invested. Many years from now, investments in Tesla, Home Depot, and Garmin made today will likely become important parts of a retirement portfolio.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>These 3 Unique Stocks Have Undeniable Long-Term Upside</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nThese 3 Unique Stocks Have Undeniable Long-Term Upside\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-05-29 16:13 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/05/27/these-3-unique-stocks-have-undeniable-long-term-up/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Investors always need to consider valuation as well as business potential when deciding whether to invest in a stock. When valuations are in a general decline, as they are right now, it can be a great...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/05/27/these-3-unique-stocks-have-undeniable-long-term-up/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BK4555":"新能源车","BK4533":"AQR资本管理(全球第二大对冲基金)","BK4566":"资本集团","BK4527":"明星科技股","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓","TSLA":"特斯拉","BK4574":"无人驾驶","BK4551":"寇图资本持仓","BK4083":"家庭装潢零售","BK4581":"高盛持仓","BK4504":"桥水持仓","BK4099":"汽车制造商","BK4511":"特斯拉概念","BK4548":"巴美列捷福持仓","GRMN":"佳明","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","HD":"家得宝","BK4567":"ESG概念","BK4523":"印度概念"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/05/27/these-3-unique-stocks-have-undeniable-long-term-up/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2238219576","content_text":"Investors always need to consider valuation as well as business potential when deciding whether to invest in a stock. When valuations are in a general decline, as they are right now, it can be a great time to dig in and look for companies that have long-term potential. Smart investors use corrections and bear markets to provide extra juice for future returns.Technology stocks have led the decline, as their prior gains led to lofty valuation levels. But there have been meaningful drops in all sectors, and investors can use this market decline to add a diverse mix of holdings with solid businesses, despite recent stock declines.Here are three stocks that have dropped between 25% and 35% this year but offer investors diversity and solid long-term prospects.Strong sales growthA good mix of three such businesses that should continue to have solid future growth are Tesla, Home Depot, and GPS device maker Garmin. When the biggest knock on a stock is its valuation, a bear market offers a chance to reevaluate whether it belongs in your portfolio.Heading into this year, Tesla shares returned more than 1,000% over the prior two and a half years. Home Depot gained about 120% in that time, pushing the valuations of both stocks ahead of the businesses themselves. In some environments, that's OK, and the business results will catch up quickly.But in the current environment, the stocks started to correct as supply chain challenges, the onset of inflation, and rising interest rates raised questions about business results in the near-term future. But in the longer term, sales growth should continue for these companies.Tesla believes rising demand, and its two new manufacturing plants that opened this year in Texas and Germany, will help it achieve 50% annual sales growth for several more years. Garmin has been riding a long-term wave of growing interest in outdoor activities. Sales of its popular GPS-enabled products rose 19% in 2021, capping off six straight years of increasing revenue. And Home Depot has also worked to increase its revenue by 50% over the past five years.HD Revenue (Annual) data by YChartsFalling to the bottom lineMuch of that revenue for all three companies is also reaching the bottom line. Tesla stands out among automakers with an impressive operating margin of 19.2% in the first quarter. When looked at on a trailing 12-month (TTM) basis, the improvement seems even more impressive, and is more than twice what traditional automakers like General Motors and Ford have been able to achieve over the last several years.TSLA Operating Margin (TTM) data by YChartsGarmin's profitability is even more impressive, as it has steadily achieved gross margins approaching 60%, and operating margins have been hovering around 25% over the past two years.Why invest now?Whether to invest in these businesses now still should be determined by what looks to come ahead, not from past performance. But all three look to continue their recent success. Garmin grew revenue 9% in the first quarter, and maintains its estimate for more than a 10% increase for the full year versus 2021. Management also showed its confidence by announcing a newly authorized $300 million share repurchase plan. The share buyback would be the first in four years and complements a reliable dividend that recently yielded 2.6%.Home Depot initiated a multiyear investment program in 2017 that has helped its digital sales soar. But the One Home Depot plan also now focuses on growing its professionals business. Increasing that customer base helped its average sales ticket grow by 11.4% in the first quarter versus the prior-year period. The company expects that improvement to continue.Tesla's astounding sales growth doesn't make the stock cheap by traditional valuation metrics. Even after its recent drop, Tesla shares trade at a sky-high price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 133 based on 2021 earnings. But if sales continue to soar 50% annually as expected, that will continue to move down. That will take some time, however, and is another reason that these are being looked at as investments for the long haul. That valuation may mean limited upside in Tesla shares for a few years.But that's how retirement savings should be invested. Many years from now, investments in Tesla, Home Depot, and Garmin made today will likely become important parts of a retirement portfolio.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":46,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9028202984,"gmtCreate":1653227903648,"gmtModify":1676535242922,"author":{"id":"3554886109685293","authorId":"3554886109685293","name":"Expert126","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2d4304f2ec7fabd9d599a3ba8b2a17e0","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3554886109685293","authorIdStr":"3554886109685293"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Okok","listText":"Okok","text":"Okok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9028202984","repostId":"2236176020","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2236176020","pubTimestamp":1653199246,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2236176020?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-05-22 14:00","market":"us","language":"en","title":"PayPal: Buy In June","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2236176020","media":"seekingalpha","summary":"SummaryPayPal's 2021 Q4 earnings miss scared analysts and investors to where even a meet for Q1 2022","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>Summary</b></p><ul><li>PayPal&#39;s 2021 Q4 earnings miss scared analysts and investors to where even a meet for Q1 2022&#39;s earnings report led to a temporary rally.</li><li>A deep-dive into the earnings report numbers and management sentiment show this quarter&#39;s earnings to be highly bullish.</li><li>In spite of this novel information, the market has further discounted PYPL to the point where I believe the stock is underpriced and worth a speculative long position.</li></ul><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a4621b6b743b15888d1b340b756b9e8f\" tg-width=\"750\" tg-height=\"500\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>gutaper/iStock Editorial via Getty Images</span></p><p>In Timing the Market, I recommend a long position on <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PYPL\">PayPal</a> (NASDAQ:PYPL) over earnings. While PYPL did pop as much as 13% on earnings, to the benefit of Timing the Market subscribers, it pulled back quickly, then consolidating (trending sideways), bestowing no real benefit to investors. Now, PYPL has pulled back to where it is currently trading below my recommended entry price.</p><p>Today, as requested, I want to take another look at PYPL to determine whether this is a good entry point.</p><p><b>The Earnings Call</b></p><p>Let&#39;s start with a quick recap of the earnings play. The play was highly based on seasonality. Just from a seasonal perspective, being long PYPL over Q1 earnings is a winning trade.</p><p>This trade has an 83% win rate. The average upside movement is nearly 12x larger than the downside movement, and so we have the rare &#34;Phoenix&#34; type of earnings trade here: Both probability and risk/reward profile are in favor of the bulls.</p><p>Just holding over the month covering Q1 earnings gives 14% of the annual gains, 6% more than expected. Essentially, PYPL moves up two times as quickly as expected over Q1 earnings reports. As Mandelbrot would put it, market time moves faster over PYPL&#39;s Q1 earnings.</p><p>We noted also that the max pain for the closest options expiring after the earnings report is bullish. I calculated an expected movement of $10.80 from the cost of the at-the-money straddle: Both puts and calls for Apr29 were trading at $5.40, and the cost of the straddle is just the sum of these two option prices. After looking at the actual movement, we find that the options market pricing in a $10.80 move was pretty much right on the money.</p><p>Moreover, the previous quarter being a miss in EPS makes PYPL more likely to rally in the case of a meet or beat:</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b77fb6f5171428f6e43bef7f1d7ffb01\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"335\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>Estimize</span></p><p>PYPL indeed met its EPS expectations, and the stock rallied. This wouldn&#39;t normally be the case, but last quarter&#39;s miss allowed a special earnings-play opportunity. I recommended buying the Jul15 $85 calls, which rose by about 100% in value on the day earnings was reported.</p><p>This play worked out, but only if you were playing earnings. If you were a PYPL investor, you would have seen stagnation, followed by PYPL tanking along with most other stocks in the early-May selloff.</p><p><b>What Now?</b></p><p>You can think of an earnings report as a sort of Mandelbrot hyperbolic time chamber for market time. Usually, the market slowly adjusts a stock price as new information is released continually over the year. However, an earnings report is like an intravenous injection of novel information that requires immediate adaption.</p><p>Still, just as with a body&#39;s reaction to an injection, the market still must make some post-injection adaptions. The earnings call is particularly important, in my studies of the market, in that they broadcast management sentiment for the coming quarter. I have run many studies on management sentiment changes as calculated through earnings calls to find sentiment an important predictor of stock price leading up to the subsequent earnings report.</p><p>In my research, I employ financial lexical analysis on earnings calls to arrive at a sentiment score, which is - in short - the difference between optimistic forward-looking statements and pessimistic forward-looking statements, normalized for the length of the earnings call. I have done exactly this for PayPal&#39;s earnings calls, including that of the most recent quarterly report. This quarter showed a 26% increase in sentiment score, quarter-over-quarter, and a 7% increase year-over-year.</p><p>While the 7% increase year-over-year doesn&#39;t seem all that impressive, when you plot the story of PYPL&#39;s sentiment over the past year, you&#39;ll see things in a different light. The last year saw sentiment fall sharply, starting with Q2&#39;s earnings call. Ever since the stock has fallen with sentiment but this quarter marks a return to optimism that we have not seen all year:</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bb6efbc382e74c6ce1fc4d4c20ade228\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"260\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>StockCharts</span></p><p><b>Positive Catalysts</b></p><p>Overall, the earnings sentiment is a bullish signal for PYPL over the coming quarter yet remains but a metric on its own. To understand things from a more fundamental level, let&#39;s take a look at a few of the statements flagged for positive sentiment. This should help us to understand why the current earnings call was bullish for this company.</p><blockquote>&#34;We think we have the lowest loss rates of the Buy Now, Pay Later industry, probably the highest approval rates because we know so many of the customers and a really powerful value proposition to merchants.&#34;</blockquote><p>- In a non-inflationary environment, debtors win, while creditors lose. But once we enter a time of inflation, it&#39;s good to be a creditor. PayPal&#39;s business over the past decade has been uphill from this perspective. Now that we are seeing high inflation numbers and interest rate increases, PayPal should see excess returns as a creditor. While other companies are facing excess costs due to inflation, PayPal has at least <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> countermeasure via its successful Buy Now, Pay Later system.</p><blockquote>&#34;Pre-pandemic, we were in the process of simplifying our operating model and enhancing our operating efficiency. The pandemic forced us to put many of those initiatives on hold to simply scale the business and support the unprecedented growth on our platform.&#34;</blockquote><p>- One reason PYPL hasn&#39;t seen much upward buying pressure is the expectation that the company cannot see the same type of growth going forward as it did during the pandemic. Of course, this is true, but another way to think of the slowing growth is PayPal returning to its pre-pandemic business plan, which was highly accepted even without the pandemic-bonus, at least according to the stock prices that the market was accepting for this stock. We are most likely looking at an inflection point for PayPal to return to a more sustainable business operation strategy and should thus be focused on efficiency, margins, and the like instead of pure growth. I think the market will eventually catch up with this idea, and we will see PYPL return to - at least - its pre-pandemic market-accepted price range of over $100 per share.</p><blockquote>&#34;And our integration plans with Amazon are progressing, with the back half of the year as our current launch time frame.&#34;</blockquote><p>- This is another bullish catalyst that - in my opinion - is being highly discounted. Besides the obvious benefit of Amazon users employing PayPal more often, the integration itself has led to the design of important financial service tools that are set to greatly benefit PayPal&#39;s bottom line. For example, over half of PayPal users are now using the PayPal digital wallet designed to be used with Amazon. The installation of the digital wallet app has led to 25% more transactions. Moreover, the digital wallet is a marketing tool for PayPal&#39;s new financial services, such as the aforementioned Buy Now, Pay Later.</p><blockquote>&#34;The first quarter of 2021 was the strongest in our history, with 31% spot revenue growth and 84% non-GAAP EPS growth.&#34;</blockquote><p>- Clearly, the market either hasn&#39;t properly priced in this growth or is discounting future weakness. At the very least, this quarter&#39;s results should have a beneficial impact to the company&#39;s balance sheet, and so I would expect the stock price to be higher now than prior to the earnings report. Moreover, as pointed out above, PayPal has several bullish catalysts in the coming year. Ultimately, from both a financial and fundamental viewpoint, I consider the market having not adequately priced in the novel information released in this quarter&#39;s earnings and earnings call.</p><p><b>Conclusion and Trade Idea</b></p><p>My last sentence sums up my thoughts: PayPal is underpriced given the novel information that was released over earnings. Earnings sentiment also points to upward drift over the coming quarter. June happens to be a strong month for PYPL, and so we will be considering adding PYPL to our June seasonal portfolio in Timing the Market:</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/aba655363921ba1e7e956d3551cd0b27\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"420\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>Damon Verial</span></p><p>Here is my trade idea:</p><p><b>Buy Jun24 $82 calls</b></p><p>The idea is to hold over the first half of June, exercising the option or rolling the option over after the general market recovers. The idea here is to protect against large losses due to the current market volatility. Buying calls is the same as being long PYPL with protective puts but requires less capital.</p><p>The reason we want to be conservative is due to the risk of PYPL falling more simply as a result of a general market selloff. We also see the possibility of investors just not interested in dip-buying PYPL with regard to other dip-buying opportunities due to PYPL&#39;s pandemic growth no longer on the table. This could mean that PYPL will need more time before it sees a significant influx of investor capital.</p><p>With this play, we gain all the upside should Mr. Market start to price PYPL &#34;correctly&#34; (from my viewpoint) without the downside risk. The maximum risk (read: loss) here is the cost of the call option, which is currently $575 each.</p><p>If you don&#39;t mind the risk, you can - of course - just go long PYPL, as we are likely to do in our June Timing the Market portfolio.</p><p>Let me know your thoughts.</p></body></html>","source":"seekingalpha","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>PayPal: Buy In June</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nPayPal: Buy In June\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-05-22 14:00 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4513376-paypal-buy-in-june><strong>seekingalpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>SummaryPayPal's 2021 Q4 earnings miss scared analysts and investors to where even a meet for Q1 2022's earnings report led to a temporary rally.A deep-dive into the earnings report numbers and ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4513376-paypal-buy-in-june\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"PYPL":"PayPal"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4513376-paypal-buy-in-june","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5a36db9d73b4222bc376d24ccc48c8a4","article_id":"2236176020","content_text":"SummaryPayPal's 2021 Q4 earnings miss scared analysts and investors to where even a meet for Q1 2022's earnings report led to a temporary rally.A deep-dive into the earnings report numbers and management sentiment show this quarter's earnings to be highly bullish.In spite of this novel information, the market has further discounted PYPL to the point where I believe the stock is underpriced and worth a speculative long position.gutaper/iStock Editorial via Getty ImagesIn Timing the Market, I recommend a long position on PayPal (NASDAQ:PYPL) over earnings. While PYPL did pop as much as 13% on earnings, to the benefit of Timing the Market subscribers, it pulled back quickly, then consolidating (trending sideways), bestowing no real benefit to investors. Now, PYPL has pulled back to where it is currently trading below my recommended entry price.Today, as requested, I want to take another look at PYPL to determine whether this is a good entry point.The Earnings CallLet's start with a quick recap of the earnings play. The play was highly based on seasonality. Just from a seasonal perspective, being long PYPL over Q1 earnings is a winning trade.This trade has an 83% win rate. The average upside movement is nearly 12x larger than the downside movement, and so we have the rare \"Phoenix\" type of earnings trade here: Both probability and risk/reward profile are in favor of the bulls.Just holding over the month covering Q1 earnings gives 14% of the annual gains, 6% more than expected. Essentially, PYPL moves up two times as quickly as expected over Q1 earnings reports. As Mandelbrot would put it, market time moves faster over PYPL's Q1 earnings.We noted also that the max pain for the closest options expiring after the earnings report is bullish. I calculated an expected movement of $10.80 from the cost of the at-the-money straddle: Both puts and calls for Apr29 were trading at $5.40, and the cost of the straddle is just the sum of these two option prices. After looking at the actual movement, we find that the options market pricing in a $10.80 move was pretty much right on the money.Moreover, the previous quarter being a miss in EPS makes PYPL more likely to rally in the case of a meet or beat:EstimizePYPL indeed met its EPS expectations, and the stock rallied. This wouldn't normally be the case, but last quarter's miss allowed a special earnings-play opportunity. I recommended buying the Jul15 $85 calls, which rose by about 100% in value on the day earnings was reported.This play worked out, but only if you were playing earnings. If you were a PYPL investor, you would have seen stagnation, followed by PYPL tanking along with most other stocks in the early-May selloff.What Now?You can think of an earnings report as a sort of Mandelbrot hyperbolic time chamber for market time. Usually, the market slowly adjusts a stock price as new information is released continually over the year. However, an earnings report is like an intravenous injection of novel information that requires immediate adaption.Still, just as with a body's reaction to an injection, the market still must make some post-injection adaptions. The earnings call is particularly important, in my studies of the market, in that they broadcast management sentiment for the coming quarter. I have run many studies on management sentiment changes as calculated through earnings calls to find sentiment an important predictor of stock price leading up to the subsequent earnings report.In my research, I employ financial lexical analysis on earnings calls to arrive at a sentiment score, which is - in short - the difference between optimistic forward-looking statements and pessimistic forward-looking statements, normalized for the length of the earnings call. I have done exactly this for PayPal's earnings calls, including that of the most recent quarterly report. This quarter showed a 26% increase in sentiment score, quarter-over-quarter, and a 7% increase year-over-year.While the 7% increase year-over-year doesn't seem all that impressive, when you plot the story of PYPL's sentiment over the past year, you'll see things in a different light. The last year saw sentiment fall sharply, starting with Q2's earnings call. Ever since the stock has fallen with sentiment but this quarter marks a return to optimism that we have not seen all year:StockChartsPositive CatalystsOverall, the earnings sentiment is a bullish signal for PYPL over the coming quarter yet remains but a metric on its own. To understand things from a more fundamental level, let's take a look at a few of the statements flagged for positive sentiment. This should help us to understand why the current earnings call was bullish for this company.\"We think we have the lowest loss rates of the Buy Now, Pay Later industry, probably the highest approval rates because we know so many of the customers and a really powerful value proposition to merchants.\"- In a non-inflationary environment, debtors win, while creditors lose. But once we enter a time of inflation, it's good to be a creditor. PayPal's business over the past decade has been uphill from this perspective. Now that we are seeing high inflation numbers and interest rate increases, PayPal should see excess returns as a creditor. While other companies are facing excess costs due to inflation, PayPal has at least one countermeasure via its successful Buy Now, Pay Later system.\"Pre-pandemic, we were in the process of simplifying our operating model and enhancing our operating efficiency. The pandemic forced us to put many of those initiatives on hold to simply scale the business and support the unprecedented growth on our platform.\"- One reason PYPL hasn't seen much upward buying pressure is the expectation that the company cannot see the same type of growth going forward as it did during the pandemic. Of course, this is true, but another way to think of the slowing growth is PayPal returning to its pre-pandemic business plan, which was highly accepted even without the pandemic-bonus, at least according to the stock prices that the market was accepting for this stock. We are most likely looking at an inflection point for PayPal to return to a more sustainable business operation strategy and should thus be focused on efficiency, margins, and the like instead of pure growth. I think the market will eventually catch up with this idea, and we will see PYPL return to - at least - its pre-pandemic market-accepted price range of over $100 per share.\"And our integration plans with Amazon are progressing, with the back half of the year as our current launch time frame.\"- This is another bullish catalyst that - in my opinion - is being highly discounted. Besides the obvious benefit of Amazon users employing PayPal more often, the integration itself has led to the design of important financial service tools that are set to greatly benefit PayPal's bottom line. For example, over half of PayPal users are now using the PayPal digital wallet designed to be used with Amazon. The installation of the digital wallet app has led to 25% more transactions. Moreover, the digital wallet is a marketing tool for PayPal's new financial services, such as the aforementioned Buy Now, Pay Later.\"The first quarter of 2021 was the strongest in our history, with 31% spot revenue growth and 84% non-GAAP EPS growth.\"- Clearly, the market either hasn't properly priced in this growth or is discounting future weakness. At the very least, this quarter's results should have a beneficial impact to the company's balance sheet, and so I would expect the stock price to be higher now than prior to the earnings report. Moreover, as pointed out above, PayPal has several bullish catalysts in the coming year. Ultimately, from both a financial and fundamental viewpoint, I consider the market having not adequately priced in the novel information released in this quarter's earnings and earnings call.Conclusion and Trade IdeaMy last sentence sums up my thoughts: PayPal is underpriced given the novel information that was released over earnings. Earnings sentiment also points to upward drift over the coming quarter. June happens to be a strong month for PYPL, and so we will be considering adding PYPL to our June seasonal portfolio in Timing the Market:Damon VerialHere is my trade idea:Buy Jun24 $82 callsThe idea is to hold over the first half of June, exercising the option or rolling the option over after the general market recovers. The idea here is to protect against large losses due to the current market volatility. Buying calls is the same as being long PYPL with protective puts but requires less capital.The reason we want to be conservative is due to the risk of PYPL falling more simply as a result of a general market selloff. We also see the possibility of investors just not interested in dip-buying PYPL with regard to other dip-buying opportunities due to PYPL's pandemic growth no longer on the table. This could mean that PYPL will need more time before it sees a significant influx of investor capital.With this play, we gain all the upside should Mr. Market start to price PYPL \"correctly\" (from my viewpoint) without the downside risk. The maximum risk (read: loss) here is the cost of the call option, which is currently $575 each.If you don't mind the risk, you can - of course - just go long PYPL, as we are likely to do in our June Timing the Market portfolio.Let me know your thoughts.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":119,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9011819129,"gmtCreate":1648854196197,"gmtModify":1676534409201,"author":{"id":"3554886109685293","authorId":"3554886109685293","name":"Expert126","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2d4304f2ec7fabd9d599a3ba8b2a17e0","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3554886109685293","authorIdStr":"3554886109685293"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Now","listText":"Now","text":"Now","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9011819129","repostId":"2224343469","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2224343469","pubTimestamp":1648815715,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2224343469?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-04-01 20:21","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Should You Buy Tesla Now or Wait Until After the Stock Split?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2224343469","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"This latest announcement by the electric vehicle pioneer has investors taking a fresh look.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>Tesla</b> is one of the most highly publicized and widely followed companies on Wall Street. Most investors have an opinion regarding the company and its enigmatic CEO Elon Musk, ranging from blisteringly harsh to wildly enthusiastic -- and everything in between. There&#39;s no arguing, however, that Tesla has changed the way the public at large views electric vehicles (EVs), becoming the industry leader in the process.</p><p>The company isn&#39;t known for being a wallflower, attracting attention to its achievements and frequently making headlines. So it shouldn&#39;t come as a surprise to investors that Tesla is breaking with convention and considering <i>another</i> stock split, less than two years after the company&#39;s first splitting of its shares.</p><p>Investors considering buying Tesla stock or adding to an existing position are faced with an interesting conundrum: Should they buy shares now, or wait until after the stock split?</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://g.foolcdn.com/image/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fg.foolcdn.com%2Feditorial%2Fimages%2F672565%2Ftesla-model-s-01.jpg&amp;w=700&amp;op=resize\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"525\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>Image source: Tesla.</span></p><h2>Buy now, or wait for the split?</h2><p>Tesla last split its shares in 2020, recently enough to provide insight into whether investors should buy the stock now or wait until after the split. A pattern has emerged in recent years that seems particularly pronounced with well-known and highly followed stocks, as noted by my friend and Motley Fool colleague Dan Caplinger:</p><ul><li>From the time of the announcement until split-adjusted trading began, the stock price tended to surge, outpacing the overall market.</li><li>Immediately following and several days after the stock split there <i>could</i> be additional stock price gains.</li><li>Shortly after the split, the stock tended to continue the trajectory it was on before the announcement of the stock split.</li></ul><p>Tesla varied somewhat from that pattern. From the time of its stock split announcement to its completion, shares surged 81%. However, during the eight days <i>following</i> the split, Tesla shares slumped more than 30%, before rebounding and beginning a relentless climb higher.</p><p>In fact, from the date of the stock split announcement in early August through the end of 2020 -- a period of about five months -- Tesla shares gained nearly 157% overall. It wasn&#39;t all wine and roses, however. Investor enthusiasm didn&#39;t insulate the stock from the occasional downturn, as shares have fallen by 25% <i>or more</i> on five separate occasions since the stock split was announced. The lesson here is that investor psychology alone isn&#39;t enough to propel a stock higher over the long term.</p><p>What&#39;s different this time is that Tesla has telegraphed to investors its intent to initiate another stock split. At this point, we don&#39;t yet know the timing of the split or what the ratio for the split will be. That information will likely be available as soon as Tesla releases a proxy statement in advance of its annual meeting, since the move to increase the share count will require shareholder approval.</p><p>That means investors still have time to get a jump on the stock in advance of the full announcement -- but should they?</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4e13dc6ff15526c1e6e0770e498eaee0\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>Image source: Getty Images.</span></p><h2>It depends</h2><p>As with so many things, the answer to this question is &#34;it depends.&#34; If you aren&#39;t interested in being a Tesla shareholder, the mere announcement of a pending stock split shouldn&#39;t be a reason for you to invest.</p><p>If you <i>are</i> interested in becoming a Tesla shareholder, the decision is largely dictated by your personal circumstances and the limitations set by your broker. Tesla shares are currently priced at roughly $1,100 per share (as of this writing). If you have sufficient capital to lay out for one or more full shares of Tesla stock, there&#39;s no reason not to add to a position or start a new one now.</p><p>For those who don&#39;t have that much cash to invest, some brokers permit the purchase of fractional shares, buying some portion of a full share depending on how much money you have to invest. If your broker doesn&#39;t have a provision for trading fractional shares, you can simply wait until after the stock split in the hopes that the split-adjusted price is more in line with your budget.</p><h2>Reasons to be bullish</h2><p>Investors need only review Tesla&#39;s recent results for evidence that the stock is a buy. The company announced record deliveries in the fourth quarter, with 308,600 vehicles, which vastly outperformed analysts&#39; consensus estimates of 267,000. The full-year numbers were equally impressive, with 936,172 deliveries, well ahead of expectations of 897,000.</p><p>Robust production and deliveries sparked sterling financial results, as fourth-quarter revenue of $17.7 billion surged 65% year over year. At the same time, operating expenses grew just 50%, dropping more profit to the bottom line and driving adjusted net income to $2.88 billion, up 219%. Expanding profit margins are a clear indication that Tesla has achieved scale.</p><p>Recent developments suggest this could be just the beginning. Last year, Tesla said it expects to achieve 50% annual growth in vehicle deliveries &#34;over a multi-year horizon,&#34; a forecast it reiterated in its most recent quarter. With both the Berlin Gigafactory and the Texas Gigafactory coming online, Tesla has the production capacity to make that outlook a reality.</p><p>Given the ongoing demand for its industry-leading EVs, its increasing manufacturing capability, and its robust financial results, it doesn&#39;t really matter whether you buy Tesla stock now or wait until after the split. Just as long as you buy it.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Should You Buy Tesla Now or Wait Until After the Stock Split?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nShould You Buy Tesla Now or Wait Until After the Stock Split?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-04-01 20:21 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/04/01/should-buy-tesla-now-wait-until-after-stock-split/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Tesla is one of the most highly publicized and widely followed companies on Wall Street. Most investors have an opinion regarding the company and its enigmatic CEO Elon Musk, ranging from blisteringly...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/04/01/should-buy-tesla-now-wait-until-after-stock-split/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉","BK4527":"明星科技股","BK4548":"巴美列捷福持仓","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","BK4511":"特斯拉概念","BK4551":"寇图资本持仓","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓","BK4581":"高盛持仓","BK4555":"新能源车","BK4533":"AQR资本管理(全球第二大对冲基金)","BK4099":"汽车制造商","BK4574":"无人驾驶"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/04/01/should-buy-tesla-now-wait-until-after-stock-split/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2224343469","content_text":"Tesla is one of the most highly publicized and widely followed companies on Wall Street. Most investors have an opinion regarding the company and its enigmatic CEO Elon Musk, ranging from blisteringly harsh to wildly enthusiastic -- and everything in between. There's no arguing, however, that Tesla has changed the way the public at large views electric vehicles (EVs), becoming the industry leader in the process.The company isn't known for being a wallflower, attracting attention to its achievements and frequently making headlines. So it shouldn't come as a surprise to investors that Tesla is breaking with convention and considering another stock split, less than two years after the company's first splitting of its shares.Investors considering buying Tesla stock or adding to an existing position are faced with an interesting conundrum: Should they buy shares now, or wait until after the stock split?Image source: Tesla.Buy now, or wait for the split?Tesla last split its shares in 2020, recently enough to provide insight into whether investors should buy the stock now or wait until after the split. A pattern has emerged in recent years that seems particularly pronounced with well-known and highly followed stocks, as noted by my friend and Motley Fool colleague Dan Caplinger:From the time of the announcement until split-adjusted trading began, the stock price tended to surge, outpacing the overall market.Immediately following and several days after the stock split there could be additional stock price gains.Shortly after the split, the stock tended to continue the trajectory it was on before the announcement of the stock split.Tesla varied somewhat from that pattern. From the time of its stock split announcement to its completion, shares surged 81%. However, during the eight days following the split, Tesla shares slumped more than 30%, before rebounding and beginning a relentless climb higher.In fact, from the date of the stock split announcement in early August through the end of 2020 -- a period of about five months -- Tesla shares gained nearly 157% overall. It wasn't all wine and roses, however. Investor enthusiasm didn't insulate the stock from the occasional downturn, as shares have fallen by 25% or more on five separate occasions since the stock split was announced. The lesson here is that investor psychology alone isn't enough to propel a stock higher over the long term.What's different this time is that Tesla has telegraphed to investors its intent to initiate another stock split. At this point, we don't yet know the timing of the split or what the ratio for the split will be. That information will likely be available as soon as Tesla releases a proxy statement in advance of its annual meeting, since the move to increase the share count will require shareholder approval.That means investors still have time to get a jump on the stock in advance of the full announcement -- but should they?Image source: Getty Images.It dependsAs with so many things, the answer to this question is \"it depends.\" If you aren't interested in being a Tesla shareholder, the mere announcement of a pending stock split shouldn't be a reason for you to invest.If you are interested in becoming a Tesla shareholder, the decision is largely dictated by your personal circumstances and the limitations set by your broker. Tesla shares are currently priced at roughly $1,100 per share (as of this writing). If you have sufficient capital to lay out for one or more full shares of Tesla stock, there's no reason not to add to a position or start a new one now.For those who don't have that much cash to invest, some brokers permit the purchase of fractional shares, buying some portion of a full share depending on how much money you have to invest. If your broker doesn't have a provision for trading fractional shares, you can simply wait until after the stock split in the hopes that the split-adjusted price is more in line with your budget.Reasons to be bullishInvestors need only review Tesla's recent results for evidence that the stock is a buy. The company announced record deliveries in the fourth quarter, with 308,600 vehicles, which vastly outperformed analysts' consensus estimates of 267,000. The full-year numbers were equally impressive, with 936,172 deliveries, well ahead of expectations of 897,000.Robust production and deliveries sparked sterling financial results, as fourth-quarter revenue of $17.7 billion surged 65% year over year. At the same time, operating expenses grew just 50%, dropping more profit to the bottom line and driving adjusted net income to $2.88 billion, up 219%. Expanding profit margins are a clear indication that Tesla has achieved scale.Recent developments suggest this could be just the beginning. Last year, Tesla said it expects to achieve 50% annual growth in vehicle deliveries \"over a multi-year horizon,\" a forecast it reiterated in its most recent quarter. With both the Berlin Gigafactory and the Texas Gigafactory coming online, Tesla has the production capacity to make that outlook a reality.Given the ongoing demand for its industry-leading EVs, its increasing manufacturing capability, and its robust financial results, it doesn't really matter whether you buy Tesla stock now or wait until after the split. Just as long as you buy it.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":153,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9033324991,"gmtCreate":1646194668757,"gmtModify":1676534102678,"author":{"id":"3554886109685293","authorId":"3554886109685293","name":"Expert126","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2d4304f2ec7fabd9d599a3ba8b2a17e0","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3554886109685293","authorIdStr":"3554886109685293"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Humans","listText":"Humans","text":"Humans","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9033324991","repostId":"1162614571","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1162614571","pubTimestamp":1646193023,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1162614571?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-03-02 11:50","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Fear, Panic And War Are Bad Reasons To Sell Stocks","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1162614571","media":"TheStreet","summary":"SummaryMany people are concerned that the war in Ukraine will damage their portfolios.It is natural ","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>Summary</b></p><ul><li>Many people are concerned that the war in Ukraine will damage their portfolios.</li><li>It is natural to be worried during scary situations, but history shows that times like now are poor times to sell.</li><li>Generally speaking, stock market declines due to disaster scenarios are very short lived.</li><li>In this article, I will make the case that many stocks (particularly energy stocks) will do just fine in this environment.</li></ul><p>The world is a scary place right now. An armed conflict between Russia and Ukraine has created an atmosphere of panic unlike any in recent memory. Various media outlets have described the crisis as the biggest armed conflict in Europe since World War 2. The days-old conflict has already claimed hundreds of lives, and displaced hundreds of thousands of Ukrainians. It is a very frightening, and tragic, situation.</p><p>So, it shouldn&#39;t come as any surprise that markets have been jittery since the war began. On February 24, the first day after Russia&#39;s invasion, markets opened1.65% lower than they closed the day before. In subsequent trading days, the markets regained what they had lost, and then some. Nevertheless, scary sounding headlines continued to be released for the remainder of the week. Some examples include:</p><ul><li><p>&#34;These 13 Stocks Implode as the World Prepares for War.&#34; (Investor&#39;s Business Daily).</p></li><li><p>&#34;Stocks tank as War Threat intensifies.&#34; (Morningstar).</p></li><li><p>&#34;War Will Give Stocks no Peace.&#34; (Forbes).</p></li></ul><p>The subtext of these headlines couldn&#39;t be clearer:</p><p><i>War is a scary prospect for stock market investors. Be very afraid!</i></p><p>To be sure, there are legitimate reasons to be afraid of war. The human toll is very real, and wars can bring short term economic disruptions as well. The war in Ukraine has reportedly taken energy pipelines offline, contributing to higher energy costs and inflation. So there are very real reasons to be concerned. The question is,<i>&#34;is the stock market one of these reasons?&#34;</i></p><p>Going by history, no. Although the flash point moments in war do tend to be correlated with brief selloffs, stocks recover from these events quickly. There was only one case in the last 100 years in which a war was correlated with a long-term decline in stock prices but, as you&#39;re about to see, the war was not likely what caused stocks to go down that time. Generally speaking, wars can coincide with panic selling, but it doesn&#39;t last long. Given this, it would be foolhardy to sell your stocks right now because of the situation in Eastern Europe.</p><p><b>Wars and Stocks: the Correlation</b></p><p>If we look at historical market data, we can see that the very early moments of wars do tend to be correlated with stock market selloffs. A recentFortune article reviewed five major conflict situations and how they impacted stocks. It concluded that war-related stock market dips do occur, but tend to be short lived. The examples given are:</p><ul><li><p>World War 1: the Dow fell 30%, then was closed for six months, then surged 88% in 1915.</p></li><li><p>World War 2: 2.9% drawdown on the morning of the Pearl Harbor attack. Losses erased within a month.</p></li><li><p>Cuban Missile Crisis: tiny 1.2% selloff followed by a 10% gain for the remainder of the year.</p></li><li><p>9/11: 15% selloff within days of the attack. The market didn&#39;t find a bottom this time until 2002. It then went on to enter a bull market that lasted until 2008.</p></li><li><p>U.S. invading Iraq: stocks jumped 2.3% on the day of the invasion and ended the year up 30%.</p></li></ul><p>I&#39;ve included a chart below, borrowed from Trading Economics, that shows the approximate dates of the events above (except World War 1). Looking at it visually, you can see that all of these war-related events coincided with near term lows, but were followed by long-term gains. The one exception is 9/11: it took stocks nearly a year to find a bottom after that one. However, in that particular case, the long-term downtrend was not actually caused by the attack, as I&#39;ll explain shortly.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76d1ac70f5e16bcef0d0abacea19479d\" tg-width=\"816\" tg-height=\"517\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>Trading Economics</span></p><p>As you can see, 9/11 occurred about halfway through a bear market that began in 2000 and ended in 2002. It was the one &#34;war&#34; related event of the five mentioned in Fortune that was followed by prolonged bearishness. However, it was also the one where there was a lot more than conflict contributing to the selloff. The 9/11 crash occurred about halfway through the Dotcom bubble burst. The bear market of the time was caused by the rapid collapse in prices of high flying tech stocks, some of which went bankrupt and were delisted. Notable examples included:</p><ul><li><p>Pets.com (went bankrupt).</p></li><li><p>Priceline (acquired after falling 94%).</p></li><li><p>Garden.com (shut down after falling to 9 cents a share).</p></li></ul><p>All of these stocks went bust long before 9/11 was part of the conversation. Therefore, it&#39;s hard to say how much of the losses in the 2000-2002 period were due to the bubble collapsing, and how much were due to 9/11. The 2000 bubble collapsed mainly due to valuation concerns, companies experiencing financial strain, and a series of interest rate hikes in1999 and 2000. At the peak, the NASDAQ had a 175 P/E ratio. These factors probably contributed to the 2000-2002 bear market more than any conflict did.</p><p>If we take the post-9/11 selloff without the historical context, then it took the markets a little under a year to recover from the 15% drawdown. That&#39;s not too bad, all things considered. Of course, the markets took much longer to get back to the highs set in 2000. The S&amp;P 500 took six years to get back to the previous top, the NASDAQ a full 15! So the bear market of 2000-2002 was quite long, and the recovery from it was even longer. But again, most of it took place long before 9/11. The losses incurred in the immediate aftermath of that event reversed in less than a year.</p><p><b>Why Isn&#39;t War Bad For Stocks?</b></p><p>Having established that war has not historically been bad for the stock market, the next logical question to ask is, &#34;why?&#34; War is certainly among the most destructive mass-scale activities human beings participate in. Lives are lost, infrastructure is destroyed, people are displaced, and the list just goes on and on. It certainly seems like wars destroy a lot of value. Why, then, do stocks generally go up when they are happening?</p><p>First, it helps to understand how broad the stock market really is.</p><p>To begin with just the U.S., the Wilshire 5000 index consists of 3,500 stocks. It is generally taken as equivalent to the total U.S. stock market. It may exclude some OTC stocks, but it is a pretty good proxy for U.S. listed securities.</p><p>Looking abroad, there are even more stocks to choose from. The OECD says that there are41,000 listed equities globally, and the number rises every year.</p><p>What all of this means is that the universe of stocks is very large. It follows logically from this that different stocks will respond to armed conflict in different ways. While you might find some companies out there that lose money because of armed conflict, you&#39;ll find others that won&#39;t. Some companies will inevitably do just fine. Out of respect for the lives in jeopardy in Eastern Europe right now, I will avoid any talk of arms dealers, defense contractors and other &#34;war beneficiary&#34; stocks. But I will draw your attention to one major industry that serves as a perfect illustration of how companies can thrive during wars:</p><p><b>Energy</b></p><p>As you might be aware, the Russia/Ukraine war has severely disrupted global energy supplies. Russia&#39;s Nord Stream 2 pipeline has been suspended, pipelines in Ukraine have been knocked out, and Western energy companies have withdrawn from Russia. Without a doubt, there are Russian energy companies that could lose a lot of money over this.<b>Gazprom</b>(OTCPK:OGZPY), for example, is heavily invested in the now suspended Nord Stream 2. Its stock had fallen 35% for the year before trading was suspended on February 25th. That&#39;s noteworthy because energy stocks as a whole rose in the same period.</p><p>So, Russian energy stocks are in a bad place right now.</p><p>But remember:</p><p><i>It&#39;s a big world out there.</i></p><p>All of the oil that&#39;s not flowing because of the Russia/Ukraine conflict has to be supplied by someone else. And because of the supply shock, that &#34;someone else&#34; is going to collect higher prices on the oil they sell. When supply decreases but demand is unchanged, prices rise. And right now, the global supply of oil is being reduced.</p><p>There are many companies that can thrive in such an environment. If you look at a Canadian energy company like <b>Suncor Energy</b>(SU), for example, it is about as insulated from the Russia/Ukraine situation as you can imagine. It makes money by selling gasoline to Canadians and by exporting crude oil to Americans. None of this is in any way threatened by the situation in Eastern Europe. Yet oil prices are rising worldwide, even in regions that are not being directly impacted by the conflict. Gasoline prices are rising right along side them. All of this means that Suncor gets to charge higher prices for its products than it did before. That results in higher earnings, as we saw the fourth quarter. In Q4, Suncor&#39;s funds from operations (FFO)grew 157%year-over-year. Net income and operating income swung from losses to profits. That was all thanks to oil prices rising year-over-year. Today, oil prices are even higher than they were in Q4, having set new 7 year highs. So Suncor should do even better in Q1.</p><p>What this example illustrates is the fact that equities can respond to crises in surprising ways. Sure, some are damaged by pandemonium, but others can do just fine. Overall, the presence of disorder in the world shouldn&#39;t affect your outlook. As history shows, it has little effect on the markets.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Fear, Panic And War Are Bad Reasons To Sell Stocks</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFear, Panic And War Are Bad Reasons To Sell Stocks\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-03-02 11:50 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.thestreet.com/apple/news/how-important-is-russia-to-apples-business><strong>TheStreet</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>SummaryMany people are concerned that the war in Ukraine will damage their portfolios.It is natural to be worried during scary situations, but history shows that times like now are poor times to sell....</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.thestreet.com/apple/news/how-important-is-russia-to-apples-business\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://www.thestreet.com/apple/news/how-important-is-russia-to-apples-business","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1162614571","content_text":"SummaryMany people are concerned that the war in Ukraine will damage their portfolios.It is natural to be worried during scary situations, but history shows that times like now are poor times to sell.Generally speaking, stock market declines due to disaster scenarios are very short lived.In this article, I will make the case that many stocks (particularly energy stocks) will do just fine in this environment.The world is a scary place right now. An armed conflict between Russia and Ukraine has created an atmosphere of panic unlike any in recent memory. Various media outlets have described the crisis as the biggest armed conflict in Europe since World War 2. The days-old conflict has already claimed hundreds of lives, and displaced hundreds of thousands of Ukrainians. It is a very frightening, and tragic, situation.So, it shouldn't come as any surprise that markets have been jittery since the war began. On February 24, the first day after Russia's invasion, markets opened1.65% lower than they closed the day before. In subsequent trading days, the markets regained what they had lost, and then some. Nevertheless, scary sounding headlines continued to be released for the remainder of the week. Some examples include:\"These 13 Stocks Implode as the World Prepares for War.\" (Investor's Business Daily).\"Stocks tank as War Threat intensifies.\" (Morningstar).\"War Will Give Stocks no Peace.\" (Forbes).The subtext of these headlines couldn't be clearer:War is a scary prospect for stock market investors. Be very afraid!To be sure, there are legitimate reasons to be afraid of war. The human toll is very real, and wars can bring short term economic disruptions as well. The war in Ukraine has reportedly taken energy pipelines offline, contributing to higher energy costs and inflation. So there are very real reasons to be concerned. The question is,\"is the stock market one of these reasons?\"Going by history, no. Although the flash point moments in war do tend to be correlated with brief selloffs, stocks recover from these events quickly. There was only one case in the last 100 years in which a war was correlated with a long-term decline in stock prices but, as you're about to see, the war was not likely what caused stocks to go down that time. Generally speaking, wars can coincide with panic selling, but it doesn't last long. Given this, it would be foolhardy to sell your stocks right now because of the situation in Eastern Europe.Wars and Stocks: the CorrelationIf we look at historical market data, we can see that the very early moments of wars do tend to be correlated with stock market selloffs. A recentFortune article reviewed five major conflict situations and how they impacted stocks. It concluded that war-related stock market dips do occur, but tend to be short lived. The examples given are:World War 1: the Dow fell 30%, then was closed for six months, then surged 88% in 1915.World War 2: 2.9% drawdown on the morning of the Pearl Harbor attack. Losses erased within a month.Cuban Missile Crisis: tiny 1.2% selloff followed by a 10% gain for the remainder of the year.9/11: 15% selloff within days of the attack. The market didn't find a bottom this time until 2002. It then went on to enter a bull market that lasted until 2008.U.S. invading Iraq: stocks jumped 2.3% on the day of the invasion and ended the year up 30%.I've included a chart below, borrowed from Trading Economics, that shows the approximate dates of the events above (except World War 1). Looking at it visually, you can see that all of these war-related events coincided with near term lows, but were followed by long-term gains. The one exception is 9/11: it took stocks nearly a year to find a bottom after that one. However, in that particular case, the long-term downtrend was not actually caused by the attack, as I'll explain shortly.Trading EconomicsAs you can see, 9/11 occurred about halfway through a bear market that began in 2000 and ended in 2002. It was the one \"war\" related event of the five mentioned in Fortune that was followed by prolonged bearishness. However, it was also the one where there was a lot more than conflict contributing to the selloff. The 9/11 crash occurred about halfway through the Dotcom bubble burst. The bear market of the time was caused by the rapid collapse in prices of high flying tech stocks, some of which went bankrupt and were delisted. Notable examples included:Pets.com (went bankrupt).Priceline (acquired after falling 94%).Garden.com (shut down after falling to 9 cents a share).All of these stocks went bust long before 9/11 was part of the conversation. Therefore, it's hard to say how much of the losses in the 2000-2002 period were due to the bubble collapsing, and how much were due to 9/11. The 2000 bubble collapsed mainly due to valuation concerns, companies experiencing financial strain, and a series of interest rate hikes in1999 and 2000. At the peak, the NASDAQ had a 175 P/E ratio. These factors probably contributed to the 2000-2002 bear market more than any conflict did.If we take the post-9/11 selloff without the historical context, then it took the markets a little under a year to recover from the 15% drawdown. That's not too bad, all things considered. Of course, the markets took much longer to get back to the highs set in 2000. The S&P 500 took six years to get back to the previous top, the NASDAQ a full 15! So the bear market of 2000-2002 was quite long, and the recovery from it was even longer. But again, most of it took place long before 9/11. The losses incurred in the immediate aftermath of that event reversed in less than a year.Why Isn't War Bad For Stocks?Having established that war has not historically been bad for the stock market, the next logical question to ask is, \"why?\" War is certainly among the most destructive mass-scale activities human beings participate in. Lives are lost, infrastructure is destroyed, people are displaced, and the list just goes on and on. It certainly seems like wars destroy a lot of value. Why, then, do stocks generally go up when they are happening?First, it helps to understand how broad the stock market really is.To begin with just the U.S., the Wilshire 5000 index consists of 3,500 stocks. It is generally taken as equivalent to the total U.S. stock market. It may exclude some OTC stocks, but it is a pretty good proxy for U.S. listed securities.Looking abroad, there are even more stocks to choose from. The OECD says that there are41,000 listed equities globally, and the number rises every year.What all of this means is that the universe of stocks is very large. It follows logically from this that different stocks will respond to armed conflict in different ways. While you might find some companies out there that lose money because of armed conflict, you'll find others that won't. Some companies will inevitably do just fine. Out of respect for the lives in jeopardy in Eastern Europe right now, I will avoid any talk of arms dealers, defense contractors and other \"war beneficiary\" stocks. But I will draw your attention to one major industry that serves as a perfect illustration of how companies can thrive during wars:EnergyAs you might be aware, the Russia/Ukraine war has severely disrupted global energy supplies. Russia's Nord Stream 2 pipeline has been suspended, pipelines in Ukraine have been knocked out, and Western energy companies have withdrawn from Russia. Without a doubt, there are Russian energy companies that could lose a lot of money over this.Gazprom(OTCPK:OGZPY), for example, is heavily invested in the now suspended Nord Stream 2. Its stock had fallen 35% for the year before trading was suspended on February 25th. That's noteworthy because energy stocks as a whole rose in the same period.So, Russian energy stocks are in a bad place right now.But remember:It's a big world out there.All of the oil that's not flowing because of the Russia/Ukraine conflict has to be supplied by someone else. And because of the supply shock, that \"someone else\" is going to collect higher prices on the oil they sell. When supply decreases but demand is unchanged, prices rise. And right now, the global supply of oil is being reduced.There are many companies that can thrive in such an environment. If you look at a Canadian energy company like Suncor Energy(SU), for example, it is about as insulated from the Russia/Ukraine situation as you can imagine. It makes money by selling gasoline to Canadians and by exporting crude oil to Americans. None of this is in any way threatened by the situation in Eastern Europe. Yet oil prices are rising worldwide, even in regions that are not being directly impacted by the conflict. Gasoline prices are rising right along side them. All of this means that Suncor gets to charge higher prices for its products than it did before. That results in higher earnings, as we saw the fourth quarter. In Q4, Suncor's funds from operations (FFO)grew 157%year-over-year. Net income and operating income swung from losses to profits. That was all thanks to oil prices rising year-over-year. Today, oil prices are even higher than they were in Q4, having set new 7 year highs. So Suncor should do even better in Q1.What this example illustrates is the fact that equities can respond to crises in surprising ways. Sure, some are damaged by pandemonium, but others can do just fine. Overall, the presence of disorder in the world shouldn't affect your outlook. As history shows, it has little effect on the markets.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":77,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9039179242,"gmtCreate":1645977425911,"gmtModify":1676534078984,"author":{"id":"3554886109685293","authorId":"3554886109685293","name":"Expert126","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2d4304f2ec7fabd9d599a3ba8b2a17e0","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3554886109685293","authorIdStr":"3554886109685293"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok I","listText":"Ok I","text":"Ok I","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9039179242","repostId":"1125580913","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1125580913","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1645926503,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1125580913?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-02-27 09:48","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Buffett Full Annual Letter：Apple is One of ‘Four Giants’ Driving the Conglomerate’s Value","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1125580913","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Warren Buffett released his annual letter to Berkshire Hathaway shareholders on Saturday. The 91-yea","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Warren Buffett released his annual letter to Berkshire Hathaway shareholders on Saturday. The 91-year-old investing legend has been publishing the letter for over six decades and it has become required reading for investors around the world.</p><p>Warren Buffett said he now considers tech giant Apple as one of the four pillars driving Berkshire Hathaway, the conglomerate of mostly old-economy businesses he’s assembled over the last five decades.</p><p>In his annual letter to shareholders released on Saturday, the 91-year-old investing legend listed Apple under the heading “Our Four Giants” and even called the company the second-most important after Berkshire’s cluster of insurers, thanks to its chief executive.</p><p>“Tim Cook, Apple’s brilliant CEO, quite properly regards users of Apple products as his first love, but all of his other constituencies benefit from Tim’s managerial touch as well,” the letter stated.</p><p>Buffett made clear he is a fan of Cook’s stock repurchase strategy, and how it gives the conglomerate increased ownership of each dollar of the iPhone maker’s earnings without the investor having to lift a finger.</p><p>“Apple – our runner-up Giant as measured by its yearend market value – is a different sort of holding. Here, our ownership is a mere 5.55%, up from 5.39% a year earlier,” Buffett said in the letter. “That increase sounds like small potatoes. But consider that each 0.1% of Apple’s 2021 earnings amounted to $100 million. We spent no Berkshire funds to gain our accretion. Apple’s repurchases did the job.”</p><p>Berkshire began buying Apple stock in 2016 under the influence of Buffett’s investing deputies Todd Combs and Ted Weschler. By mid-2018, the conglomerate accumulated 5% ownership of the iPhone maker, a stake that cost $36 billion. Today, the Apple investment is now worth more than $160 billion, taking up 40% of Berkshire’s equity portfolio.</p><p>“It’s important to understand that only dividends from Apple are counted in the GAAP earnings Berkshire reports – and last year, Apple paid us $785 million of those. Yet our ‘share’ of Apple’s earnings amounted to a staggering $5.6 billion. Much of what the company retained was used to repurchase Apple shares, an act we applaud,” Buffett said.</p><p>Berkshire is Apple’s largest shareholder, outside of index and exchange-traded fund providers.</p><p>Buffett also credited his railroad business BNSF and energy segment BHE as two other giants of the conglomerate, which both registered record earnings in 2021.</p><p>“BNSF, our third Giant, continues to be the number one artery of American commerce, which makes it an indispensable asset for America as well as for Berkshire,” Buffett said. “BHE has become a utility powerhouse and a leading force in wind, solar and transmission throughout much of the United States.”</p><p><b>Read the full letter here：</b></p><p>To the Shareholders of Berkshire Hathaway Inc.:</p><p>Charlie Munger, my long-time partner, and I have the job of managing a portion of your savings. We are honored by your trust.</p><p>Our position carries with it the responsibility to report to you what we would like to know if we were the absentee owner and you were the manager. We enjoy communicating directly with you through this annual letter, and through the annual meeting as well.</p><p>Our policy is to treat all shareholders equally. Therefore, we do not hold discussions with analysts nor large institutions. Whenever possible, also, we release important communications on Saturday mornings in order to maximize the time for shareholders and the media to absorb the news before markets open on Monday.</p><p>A wealth of Berkshire facts and figures are set forth in the annual 10-K that the company regularly files with the S.E.C. and that we reproduce on pages K-1 – K-119. Some shareholders will find this detail engrossing; others will simply prefer to learn what Charlie and I believe is new or interesting at Berkshire.</p><p>Alas, there was little action of that sort in 2021. We did, though, make reasonable progress in increasing the intrinsic value of your shares. That task has been my primary duty for 57 years. And it will continue to be.</p><p><b>What You Own</b></p><p>Berkshire owns a wide variety of businesses, some in their entirety, some only in part. The second group largely consists of marketable common stocks of major American companies. Additionally, we own a few non-U.S. equities and participate in several joint ventures or other collaborative activities.</p><p>Whatever our form of ownership, our goal is to have meaningful investments in businesses with both durable economic advantages and a first-class CEO. Please note particularly that we own stocks based upon our expectations about their long-term business performance and not because we view them as vehicles for timely market moves. That point is crucial: Charlie and I are not stock-pickers; we are business-pickers.</p><p>I make many mistakes. Consequently, our extensive collection of businesses includes some enterprises that have truly extraordinary economics, many others that enjoy good economic characteristics, and a few that are marginal. One advantage of our common-stock segment is that – on occasion – it becomes easy to buy pieces of wonderful businesses at wonderful prices. That shooting-fish-in-a-barrel experience is very rare in negotiated transactions and never occurs en masse. It is also far easier to exit from a mistake when it has been made in the marketable arena.</p><h2><b>Surprise, Surprise</b></h2><p>Here are a few items about your company that often surprise even seasoned investors:</p><p>• Many people perceive Berkshire as a large and somewhat strange collection of financial assets. In truth, Berkshire owns and operates more U.S.-based “infrastructure” assets – classified on our balance sheet as property, plant and equipment – than are owned and operated by any other American corporation. That supremacy has never been our goal. It has, however, become a fact.</p><p>At yearend, those domestic infrastructure assets were carried on Berkshire’s balance sheet at $158 billion. That number increased last year and will continue to increase. Berkshire always will be building.</p><p>• Every year, your company makes substantial federal income tax payments. In 2021, for example, we paid</p><p>$3.3 billion while the U.S. Treasury reported total corporate income-tax receipts of $402 billion. Additionally, Berkshire pays substantial state and foreign taxes. “I gave at the office” is an unassailable assertion when made by Berkshire shareholders.</p><p>Berkshire’s history vividly illustrates the invisible and often unrecognized financial partnership between  government and American businesses. Our tale begins early in 1955, when Berkshire Fine Spinning and Hathaway Manufacturing agreed to merge their businesses. In their requests for shareholder approval, these venerable New England textile companies expressed high hopes for the combination.</p><p></p><p>The Hathaway solicitation, for example, assured its shareholders that “The combination of the resources and managements will result in one of the strongest and most efficient organizations in the textile industry.” That upbeat view was endorsed by the company’s advisor, Lehman Brothers (yes, that Lehman Brothers).</p><p>I’m sure it was a joyous day in both Fall River (Berkshire) and New Bedford (Hathaway) when the union was consummated. After the bands stopped playing and the bankers went home, however, the shareholders reaped a disaster.</p><p>In the nine years following the merger, Berkshire’s owners watched the company’s net worth crater from</p><p>$51.4 million to $22.1 million. In part, this decline was caused by stock repurchases, ill-advised dividends and plant shutdowns. But nine years of effort by many thousands of employees delivered an operating loss as well. Berkshire’s struggles were not unusual: The New England textile industry had silently entered an extended and non-reversible death march.</p><p>During the nine post-merger years, the U.S. Treasury suffered as well from Berkshire’s troubles. All told, the company paid the government only $337,359 in income tax during that period – a pathetic $100 per day.</p><p>Early in 1965, things changed. Berkshire installed new management that redeployed available cash and steered essentially all earnings into a variety of good businesses, most of which remained good through the years. Coupling reinvestment of earnings with the power of compounding worked its magic, and shareholders prospered.</p><p>Berkshire’s owners, it should be noted, were not the only beneficiary of that course correction. Their “silent partner,” the U.S. Treasury, proceeded to collect many tens of billions of dollars from the company in income tax payments. Remember the $100 daily? Now, Berkshire pays roughly $9 million daily to the Treasury.</p><p>In fairness to our governmental partner, our shareholders should acknowledge – indeed trumpet – the fact that Berkshire’s prosperity has been fostered mightily because the company has operated in America. Our country would have done splendidly in the years since 1965 without Berkshire. Absent our American home, however, Berkshire would never have come close to becoming what it is today. When you see the flag, say thanks.</p><p>• From an $8.6 million purchase of National Indemnity in 1967, Berkshire has become the world leader in insurance “float” – money we hold and can invest but that does not belong to us. Including a relatively small sum derived from life insurance, Berkshire’s total float has grown from $19 million when we entered the insurance business to $147 billion.</p><p>So far, this float has cost us less than nothing. Though we have experienced a number of years when insurance losses combined with operating expenses exceeded premiums, overall we have earned a modest 55-year profit from the underwriting activities that generated our float.</p><p>Of equal importance, float is very sticky. Funds attributable to our insurance operations come and go daily, but their aggregate total is immune from precipitous decline. When it comes to investing float, we can therefore think long-term.</p><p>If you are not already familiar with the concept of float, I refer you to a long explanation on page A-5. To my surprise, our float increased $9 billion last year, a buildup of value that is important to Berkshire owners though is not reflected in our GAAP (“generally-accepted accounting principles”) presentation of earnings and net worth.</p><p>Much of our huge value creation in insurance is attributable to Berkshire’s good luck in my 1986 hiring of Ajit Jain. We first met on a Saturday morning, and I quickly asked Ajit what his insurance experience had been. He replied, “None.”</p><p>I said, “Nobody’s perfect,” and hired him. That was my lucky day: Ajit actually was as perfect a choice as could have been made. Better yet, he continues to be – 35 years later.</p><p>One final thought about insurance: I believe that it is likely – but far from assured – that Berkshire’s float can be maintained without our incurring a long-term underwriting loss. I am certain, however, that there will be some years when we experience such losses, perhaps involving very large sums.</p><p>Berkshire is constructed to handle catastrophic events as no other insurer – and that priority will remain long after Charlie and I are gone.</p><h2>Our Four Giants</h2><p>Through Berkshire, our shareholders own many dozens of businesses. Some of these, in turn, have a collection of subsidiaries of their own. For example, Marmon has more than 100 individual business operations, ranging from the leasing of railroad cars to the manufacture of medical devices.</p><p>• Nevertheless, operations of our “Big Four” companies account for a very large chunk of Berkshire’s value. Leading this list is our cluster of insurers. Berkshire effectively owns 100% of this group, whose massive float value we earlier described. The invested assets of these insurers are further enlarged by the extraordinary amount of capital we invest to back up their promises.</p><p>The insurance business is made to order for Berkshire. The product will never be obsolete, and sales volume will generally increase along with both economic growth and inflation. Also, integrity and capital will forever be important. Our company can and will behave well.</p><p>There are, of course, other insurers with excellent business models and prospects. Replication of Berkshire’s operation, however, would be almost impossible.</p><p>• Apple – our runner-up Giant as measured by its yearend market value – is a different sort of holding. Here, our ownership is a mere 5.55%, up from 5.39% a year earlier. That increase sounds like small potatoes. But consider that each 0.1% of Apple’s 2021 earnings amounted to $100 million. We spent no Berkshire funds to gain our accretion. Apple’s repurchases did the job.</p><p>It’s important to understand that only dividends from Apple are counted in the GAAP earnings Berkshire reports – and last year, Apple paid us $785 million of those. Yet our “share” of Apple’s earnings amounted to a staggering $5.6 billion. Much of what the company retained was used to repurchase Apple shares, an act we applaud. Tim Cook, Apple’s brilliant CEO, quite properly regards users of Apple products as his first love, but all of his other constituencies benefit from Tim’s managerial touch as well.</p><p>• BNSF, our third Giant, continues to be the number one artery of American commerce, which makes it an indispensable asset for America as well as for Berkshire. If the many essential products BNSF carries were instead hauled by truck, America’s carbon emissions would soar.</p><p>Your railroad had record earnings of $6 billion in 2021. Here, it should be noted, we are talking about the old-fashioned sort of earnings that we favor: a figure calculated after interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization and all forms of compensation. (Our definition suggests a warning: Deceptive “adjustments” to earnings – to use a polite description – have become both more frequent and more fanciful as stocks have risen. Speaking less politely, I would say that bull markets breed bloviated bull )</p><p>BNSF trains traveled 143 million miles last year and carried 535 million tons of cargo. Both accomplishments far exceed those of any other American carrier. You can be proud of your railroad.</p><p>• BHE, our final Giant, earned a record $4 billion in 2021. That’s up more than 30-fold from the $122 million earned in 2000, the year that Berkshire first purchased a BHE stake. Now, Berkshire owns 91.1% of the company.</p><p>BHE’s record of societal accomplishment is as remarkable as its financial performance. The company had no wind or solar generation in 2000. It was then regarded simply as a relatively new and minor participant in the huge electric utility industry. Subsequently, under David Sokol’s and Greg Abel’s leadership, BHE has become a utility powerhouse (no groaning, please) and a leading force in wind, solar and transmission throughout much of the United States.</p><p>Greg’s report on these accomplishments appears on pages A-3 and A-4. The profile you will find there is not in any way one of those currently-fashionable “green-washing” stories. BHE has been faithfully detailing its plans and performance in renewables and transmissions every year since 2007.</p><p>To further review this information, visit BHE’s website at brkenergy.com. There, you will see that the company has long been making climate-conscious moves that soak up all of its earnings. More opportunities lie ahead. BHE has the management, the experience, the capital and the appetite for the huge power projects that our country needs.</p><h2>Investments</h2><p>Now let’s talk about companies we don’t control, a list that again references Apple. Below we list our fifteen largest equity holdings, several of which are selections of Berkshire’s two long-time investment managers, Todd Combs and Ted Weschler. At yearend, this valued pair had total authority in respect to $34 billion of investments, many of which do not meet the threshold value we use in the table. Also, a significant portion of the dollars that Todd and Ted manage are lodged in various pension plans of Berkshire-owned businesses, with the assets of these plans not included in this table.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d43587e9f59c0ff76e6c04c6bf9af324\" tg-width=\"1047\" tg-height=\"530\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/>* This is our actual purchase price and also our tax basis.</p><p>** Held by BHE; consequently, Berkshire shareholders have only a 91.1% interest in this position.</p><p>*** Includes a $10 billion investment in Occidental Petroleum, consisting of preferred stock and warrants to buy common stock, a combination now being valued at $10.7 billion.</p><p>In addition to the footnoted Occidental holding and our various common-stock positions, Berkshire also owns a 26.6% interest in Kraft Heinz (accounted for on the “equity” method, not market value, and carried at $13.1 billion) and 38.6% of Pilot Corp., a leader in travel centers that had revenues last year of $45 billion.</p><p>Since we purchased our Pilot stake in 2017, this holding has warranted “equity” accounting treatment. Early in 2023, Berkshire will purchase an additional interest in Pilot that will raise our ownership to 80% and lead to our fully consolidating Pilot’s earnings, assets and liabilities in our financial statements.</p><h2>U.S. Treasury Bills</h2><p>Berkshire’s balance sheet includes $144 billion of cash and cash equivalents (excluding the holdings of BNSF and BHE). Of this sum, $120 billion is held in U.S. Treasury bills, all maturing in less than a year. That stake leaves Berkshire financing about 12 of 1% of the publicly-held national debt.</p><p>Charlie and I have pledged that Berkshire (along with our subsidiaries other than BNSF and BHE) will always hold more than $30 billion of cash and equivalents. We want your company to be financially impregnable and never dependent on the kindness of strangers (or even that of friends). Both of us like to sleep soundly, and we want our creditors, insurance claimants and you to do so as well.</p><h2>But $144 billion?</h2><p>That imposing sum, I assure you, is not some deranged expression of patriotism. Nor have Charlie and I lost our overwhelming preference for business ownership. Indeed, I first manifested my enthusiasm for that 80 years ago, on March 11, 1942, when I purchased three shares of Cities Services preferred stock. Their cost was $114.75 and required all of my savings. (The Dow Jones Industrial Average that day closed at 99, a fact that should scream to you: Never bet against America.)</p><p>After my initial plunge, I always kept at least 80% of my net worth in equities. My favored status throughout that period was 100% – and still is. Berkshire’s current 80%-or-so position in businesses is a consequence of my failure to find entire companies or small portions thereof (that is, marketable stocks) which meet our criteria for long- term holding.</p><p>Charlie and I have endured similar cash-heavy positions from time to time in the past. These periods are never pleasant; they are also never permanent. And, fortunately, we have had a mildly attractive alternative during 2020 and 2021 for deploying capital. Read on.</p><h2>Share Repurchases</h2><p>There are three ways that we can increase the value of your investment. The first is always front and center in our minds: Increase the long-term earning power of Berkshire’s controlled businesses through internal growth or by making acquisitions. Today, internal opportunities deliver far better returns than acquisitions. The size of those opportunities, however, is small compared to Berkshire’s resources.</p><p>Our second choice is to buy non-controlling part-interests in the many good or great businesses that are publicly traded. From time to time, such possibilities are both numerous and blatantly attractive. Today, though, we find little that excites us.</p><p>That’s largely because of a truism: Long-term interest rates that are low push the prices of all productive investments upward, whether these are stocks, apartments, farms, oil wells, whatever. Other factors influence valuations as well, but interest rates will always be important.</p><p>Our final path to value creation is to repurchase Berkshire shares. Through that simple act, we increase your share of the many controlled and non-controlled businesses Berkshire owns. When the price/value equation is right, this path is the easiest and most certain way for us to increase your wealth. (Alongside the accretion of value to continuing shareholders, a couple of other parties gain: Repurchases are modestly beneficial to the seller of the repurchased shares and to society as well.)</p><p>Periodically, as alternative paths become unattractive, repurchases make good sense for Berkshire’s owners. During the past two years, we therefore repurchased 9% of the shares that were outstanding at yearend 2019 for a total cost of $51.7 billion. That expenditure left our continuing shareholders owning about 10% more of all Berkshire businesses, whether these are wholly-owned (such as BNSF and GEICO) or partly-owned (such as Coca-Cola and Moody’s).</p><p>I want to underscore that for Berkshire repurchases to make sense, our shares must offer appropriate value. We don’t want to overpay for the shares of other companies, and it would be value-destroying if we were to overpay when we are buying Berkshire. As of February 23, 2022, since yearend we repurchased additional shares at a cost of $1.2 billion. Our appetite remains large but will always remain price-dependent.</p><p>It should be noted that Berkshire’s buyback opportunities are limited because of its high-class investor base. If our shares were heavily held by short-term speculators, both price volatility and transaction volumes would materially increase. That kind of reshaping would offer us far greater opportunities for creating value by making repurchases. Nevertheless, Charlie and I far prefer the owners we have, even though their admirable buy-and-keep attitudes limit the extent to which long-term shareholders can profit from opportunistic repurchases.</p><p>Finally, one easily-overlooked value calculation specific to Berkshire: As we’ve discussed, insurance “float” of the right sort is of great value to us. As it happens, repurchases automatically increase the amount of “float” per share. That figure has increased during the past two years by 25% – going from $79,387 per “A” share to $99,497, a meaningful gain that, as noted, owes some thanks to repurchases.</p><h2>A Wonderful Man and a Wonderful Business</h2><p>Last year, Paul Andrews died. Paul was the founder and CEO of TTI, a Fort Worth-based subsidiary of Berkshire. Throughout his life – in both his business and his personal pursuits – Paul quietly displayed all the qualities that Charlie and I admire. His story should be told.</p><p>In 1971, Paul was working as a purchasing agent for General Dynamics when the roof fell in. After losing a huge defense contract, the company fired thousands of employees, including Paul.</p><p>With his first child due soon, Paul decided to bet on himself, using $500 of his savings to found Tex-Tronics (later renamed TTI). The company set itself up to distribute small electronic components, and first-year sales totaled $112,000. Today, TTI markets more than one million different items with annual volume of $7.7 billion.</p><p>But back to 2006: Paul, at 63, then found himself happy with his family, his job, and his associates. But he had one nagging worry, heightened because he had recently witnessed a friend’s early death and the disastrous results that followed for that man’s family and business. What, Paul asked himself in 2006, would happen to the many people depending on him if he should unexpectedly die?</p><p>For a year, Paul wrestled with his options. Sell to a competitor? From a strictly economic viewpoint, that course made the most sense. After all, competitors could envision lucrative “synergies” – savings that would be achieved as the acquiror slashed duplicated functions at TTI.</p><p>But . . . Such a purchaser would most certainly also retain its CFO, its legal counsel, its HR unit. Their TTI counterparts would therefore be sent packing. And ugh! If a new distribution center were to be needed, the acquirer’s home city would certainly be favored over Fort Worth.</p><p>Whatever the financial benefits, Paul quickly concluded that selling to a competitor was not for him. He next considered seeking a financial buyer, a species once labeled – aptly so – a leveraged buyout firm. Paul knew, however, that such a purchaser would be focused on an “exit strategy.” And who could know what that would be? Brooding over it all, Paul found himself having no interest in handing his 35-year-old creation over to a reseller.</p><p>When Paul met me, he explained why he had eliminated these two alternatives as buyers. He then summed up his dilemma by saying – in far more tactful phrasing than this – “After a year of pondering the alternatives, I want to sell to Berkshire because you are the only guy left.” So, I made an offer and Paul said “Yes.” One meeting; one lunch; one deal.</p><p>To say we both lived happily ever after is an understatement. When Berkshire purchased TTI, the company employed 2,387. Now the number is 8,043. A large percentage of that growth took place in Fort Worth and environs. Earnings have increased 673%.</p><p>Annually, I would call Paul and tell him his salary should be substantially increased. Annually, he would tell me, “We can talk about that next year, Warren; I’m too busy now.”</p><p>When Greg Abel and I attended Paul’s memorial service, we met children, grandchildren, long-time associates (including TTI’s first employee) and John Roach, the former CEO of a Fort Worth company Berkshire had purchased in 2000. John had steered his friend Paul to Omaha, instinctively knowing we would be a match.</p><p>At the service, Greg and I heard about the multitudes of people and organizations that Paul had silently supported. The breadth of his generosity was extraordinary – geared always to improving the lives of others, particularly those in Fort Worth.</p><p>In all ways, Paul was a class act.</p><p>* * * * * * * * * * * *</p><p>Good luck – occasionally extraordinary luck – has played its part at Berkshire. If Paul and I had not enjoyed a mutual friend – John Roach – TTI would not have found its home with us. But that ample serving of luck was only the beginning. TTI was soon to lead Berkshire to its most important acquisition.</p><p>Every fall, Berkshire directors gather for a presentation by a few of our executives. We sometimes choose the site based upon the location of a recent acquisition, by that means allowing directors to meet the new subsidiary’s CEO and learn more about the acquiree’s activities.</p><p>In the fall of 2009, we consequently selected Fort Worth so that we could visit TTI. At that time, BNSF, which also had Fort Worth as its hometown, was the third-largest holding among our marketable equities. Despite that large stake, I had never visited the railroad’s headquarters.</p><p>Deb Bosanek, my assistant, scheduled our board’s opening dinner for October 22. Meanwhile, I arranged to arrive earlier that day to meet with Matt Rose, CEO of BNSF, whose accomplishments I had long admired. When I made the date, I had no idea that our get-together would coincide with BNSF’s third-quarter earnings report, which was released late on the 22nd.</p><p>The market reacted badly to the railroad’s results. The Great Recession was in full force in the third quarter, and BNSF’s earnings reflected that slump. The economic outlook was also bleak, and Wall Street wasn’t feeling friendly to railroads – or much else.</p><p>On the following day, I again got together with Matt and suggested that Berkshire would offer the railroad a better long-term home than it could expect as a public company. I also told him the maximum price that Berkshire would pay.</p><p>Matt relayed the offer to his directors and advisors. Eleven busy days later, Berkshire and BNSF announced a firm deal. And here I’ll venture a rare prediction: BNSF will be a key asset for Berkshire and our country a century from now.</p><p>The BNSF acquisition would never have happened if Paul Andrews hadn’t sized up Berkshire as the right home for TTI.</p><h2>Thanks</h2><p>I taught my first investing class 70 years ago. Since then, I have enjoyed working almost every year with students of all ages, finally “retiring” from that pursuit in 2018.</p><p>Along the way, my toughest audience was my grandson’s fifth-grade class. The 11-year-olds were squirming in their seats and giving me blank stares until I mentioned Coca-Cola and its famous secret formula. Instantly, every hand went up, and I learned that “secrets” are catnip to kids.</p><p>Teaching, like writing, has helped me develop and clarify my own thoughts. Charlie calls this phenomenon the orangutan effect: If you sit down with an orangutan and carefully explain to it one of your cherished ideas, you may leave behind a puzzled primate, but will yourself exit thinking more clearly.</p><p>Talking to university students is far superior. I have urged that they seek employment in (1) the field and (2) with the kind of people they would select, if they had no need for money. Economic realities, I acknowledge, may interfere with that kind of search. Even so, I urge the students never to give up the quest, for when they find that sort of job, they will no longer be “working.”</p><p>Charlie and I, ourselves, followed that liberating course after a few early stumbles. We both started as part- timers at my grandfather’s grocery store, Charlie in 1940 and I in 1942. We were each assigned boring tasks and paid little, definitely not what we had in mind. Charlie later took up law, and I tried selling securities. Job satisfaction continued to elude us.</p><p>Finally, at Berkshire, we found what we love to do. With very few exceptions, we have now “worked” for many decades with people whom we like and trust. It’s a joy in life to join with managers such as Paul Andrews or the Berkshire families I told you about last year. In our home office, we employ decent and talented people – no jerks. Turnover averages, perhaps, one person per year.</p><p>I would like, however, to emphasize a further item that turns our jobs into fun and satisfaction working</p><p>for you. There is nothing more rewarding to Charlie and me than enjoying the trust of individual long-term shareholders who, for many decades, have joined us with the expectation that we would be a reliable custodian of their funds.</p><p>Obviously, we can’t select our owners, as we could do if our form of operation were a partnership. Anyone can buy shares of Berkshire today with the intention of soon reselling them. For sure, we get a few of that type of shareholder, just as we get index funds that own huge amounts of Berkshire simply because they are required to do so.</p><p>To a truly unusual degree, however, Berkshire has as owners a very large corps of individuals and families that have elected to join us with an intent approaching “til death do us part.” Often, they have trusted us with a large – some might say excessive – portion of their savings.</p><p>Berkshire, these shareholders would sometimes acknowledge, might be far from the best selection they could have made. But they would add that Berkshire would rank high among those with which they would be most comfortable. And people who are comfortable with their investments will, on average, achieve better results than those who are motivated by ever-changing headlines, chatter and promises.</p><p>Long-term individual owners are both the “partners” Charlie and I have always sought and the ones we constantly have in mind as we make decisions at Berkshire. To them we say, “It feels good to ‘work’ for you, and you have our thanks for your trust.”</p><h2>The Annual Meeting</h2><p>Clear your calendar! Berkshire will have its annual gathering of capitalists in Omaha on Friday, April 29th through Sunday, May 1st. The details regarding the weekend are laid out on pages A-1 and A-2. Omaha eagerly awaits you, as do I.</p><p>I will end this letter with a sales pitch. “Cousin” Jimmy Buffett has designed a pontoon “party” boat that is now being manufactured by Forest River, a Berkshire subsidiary. The boat will be introduced on April 29 at our Berkshire Bazaar of Bargains. And, for two days only, shareholders will be able to purchase Jimmy’s masterpiece at a 10% discount. Your bargain-hunting chairman will be buying a boat for his family’s use. Join me.</p><p>February 26, 2022</p><p>Warren E. Buffett Chairman of the Board</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Buffett Full Annual Letter：Apple is One of ‘Four Giants’ Driving the Conglomerate’s Value</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBuffett Full Annual Letter：Apple is One of ‘Four Giants’ Driving the Conglomerate’s Value\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-02-27 09:48</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>Warren Buffett released his annual letter to Berkshire Hathaway shareholders on Saturday. The 91-year-old investing legend has been publishing the letter for over six decades and it has become required reading for investors around the world.</p><p>Warren Buffett said he now considers tech giant Apple as one of the four pillars driving Berkshire Hathaway, the conglomerate of mostly old-economy businesses he’s assembled over the last five decades.</p><p>In his annual letter to shareholders released on Saturday, the 91-year-old investing legend listed Apple under the heading “Our Four Giants” and even called the company the second-most important after Berkshire’s cluster of insurers, thanks to its chief executive.</p><p>“Tim Cook, Apple’s brilliant CEO, quite properly regards users of Apple products as his first love, but all of his other constituencies benefit from Tim’s managerial touch as well,” the letter stated.</p><p>Buffett made clear he is a fan of Cook’s stock repurchase strategy, and how it gives the conglomerate increased ownership of each dollar of the iPhone maker’s earnings without the investor having to lift a finger.</p><p>“Apple – our runner-up Giant as measured by its yearend market value – is a different sort of holding. Here, our ownership is a mere 5.55%, up from 5.39% a year earlier,” Buffett said in the letter. “That increase sounds like small potatoes. But consider that each 0.1% of Apple’s 2021 earnings amounted to $100 million. We spent no Berkshire funds to gain our accretion. Apple’s repurchases did the job.”</p><p>Berkshire began buying Apple stock in 2016 under the influence of Buffett’s investing deputies Todd Combs and Ted Weschler. By mid-2018, the conglomerate accumulated 5% ownership of the iPhone maker, a stake that cost $36 billion. Today, the Apple investment is now worth more than $160 billion, taking up 40% of Berkshire’s equity portfolio.</p><p>“It’s important to understand that only dividends from Apple are counted in the GAAP earnings Berkshire reports – and last year, Apple paid us $785 million of those. Yet our ‘share’ of Apple’s earnings amounted to a staggering $5.6 billion. Much of what the company retained was used to repurchase Apple shares, an act we applaud,” Buffett said.</p><p>Berkshire is Apple’s largest shareholder, outside of index and exchange-traded fund providers.</p><p>Buffett also credited his railroad business BNSF and energy segment BHE as two other giants of the conglomerate, which both registered record earnings in 2021.</p><p>“BNSF, our third Giant, continues to be the number one artery of American commerce, which makes it an indispensable asset for America as well as for Berkshire,” Buffett said. “BHE has become a utility powerhouse and a leading force in wind, solar and transmission throughout much of the United States.”</p><p><b>Read the full letter here：</b></p><p>To the Shareholders of Berkshire Hathaway Inc.:</p><p>Charlie Munger, my long-time partner, and I have the job of managing a portion of your savings. We are honored by your trust.</p><p>Our position carries with it the responsibility to report to you what we would like to know if we were the absentee owner and you were the manager. We enjoy communicating directly with you through this annual letter, and through the annual meeting as well.</p><p>Our policy is to treat all shareholders equally. Therefore, we do not hold discussions with analysts nor large institutions. Whenever possible, also, we release important communications on Saturday mornings in order to maximize the time for shareholders and the media to absorb the news before markets open on Monday.</p><p>A wealth of Berkshire facts and figures are set forth in the annual 10-K that the company regularly files with the S.E.C. and that we reproduce on pages K-1 – K-119. Some shareholders will find this detail engrossing; others will simply prefer to learn what Charlie and I believe is new or interesting at Berkshire.</p><p>Alas, there was little action of that sort in 2021. We did, though, make reasonable progress in increasing the intrinsic value of your shares. That task has been my primary duty for 57 years. And it will continue to be.</p><p><b>What You Own</b></p><p>Berkshire owns a wide variety of businesses, some in their entirety, some only in part. The second group largely consists of marketable common stocks of major American companies. Additionally, we own a few non-U.S. equities and participate in several joint ventures or other collaborative activities.</p><p>Whatever our form of ownership, our goal is to have meaningful investments in businesses with both durable economic advantages and a first-class CEO. Please note particularly that we own stocks based upon our expectations about their long-term business performance and not because we view them as vehicles for timely market moves. That point is crucial: Charlie and I are not stock-pickers; we are business-pickers.</p><p>I make many mistakes. Consequently, our extensive collection of businesses includes some enterprises that have truly extraordinary economics, many others that enjoy good economic characteristics, and a few that are marginal. One advantage of our common-stock segment is that – on occasion – it becomes easy to buy pieces of wonderful businesses at wonderful prices. That shooting-fish-in-a-barrel experience is very rare in negotiated transactions and never occurs en masse. It is also far easier to exit from a mistake when it has been made in the marketable arena.</p><h2><b>Surprise, Surprise</b></h2><p>Here are a few items about your company that often surprise even seasoned investors:</p><p>• Many people perceive Berkshire as a large and somewhat strange collection of financial assets. In truth, Berkshire owns and operates more U.S.-based “infrastructure” assets – classified on our balance sheet as property, plant and equipment – than are owned and operated by any other American corporation. That supremacy has never been our goal. It has, however, become a fact.</p><p>At yearend, those domestic infrastructure assets were carried on Berkshire’s balance sheet at $158 billion. That number increased last year and will continue to increase. Berkshire always will be building.</p><p>• Every year, your company makes substantial federal income tax payments. In 2021, for example, we paid</p><p>$3.3 billion while the U.S. Treasury reported total corporate income-tax receipts of $402 billion. Additionally, Berkshire pays substantial state and foreign taxes. “I gave at the office” is an unassailable assertion when made by Berkshire shareholders.</p><p>Berkshire’s history vividly illustrates the invisible and often unrecognized financial partnership between  government and American businesses. Our tale begins early in 1955, when Berkshire Fine Spinning and Hathaway Manufacturing agreed to merge their businesses. In their requests for shareholder approval, these venerable New England textile companies expressed high hopes for the combination.</p><p></p><p>The Hathaway solicitation, for example, assured its shareholders that “The combination of the resources and managements will result in one of the strongest and most efficient organizations in the textile industry.” That upbeat view was endorsed by the company’s advisor, Lehman Brothers (yes, that Lehman Brothers).</p><p>I’m sure it was a joyous day in both Fall River (Berkshire) and New Bedford (Hathaway) when the union was consummated. After the bands stopped playing and the bankers went home, however, the shareholders reaped a disaster.</p><p>In the nine years following the merger, Berkshire’s owners watched the company’s net worth crater from</p><p>$51.4 million to $22.1 million. In part, this decline was caused by stock repurchases, ill-advised dividends and plant shutdowns. But nine years of effort by many thousands of employees delivered an operating loss as well. Berkshire’s struggles were not unusual: The New England textile industry had silently entered an extended and non-reversible death march.</p><p>During the nine post-merger years, the U.S. Treasury suffered as well from Berkshire’s troubles. All told, the company paid the government only $337,359 in income tax during that period – a pathetic $100 per day.</p><p>Early in 1965, things changed. Berkshire installed new management that redeployed available cash and steered essentially all earnings into a variety of good businesses, most of which remained good through the years. Coupling reinvestment of earnings with the power of compounding worked its magic, and shareholders prospered.</p><p>Berkshire’s owners, it should be noted, were not the only beneficiary of that course correction. Their “silent partner,” the U.S. Treasury, proceeded to collect many tens of billions of dollars from the company in income tax payments. Remember the $100 daily? Now, Berkshire pays roughly $9 million daily to the Treasury.</p><p>In fairness to our governmental partner, our shareholders should acknowledge – indeed trumpet – the fact that Berkshire’s prosperity has been fostered mightily because the company has operated in America. Our country would have done splendidly in the years since 1965 without Berkshire. Absent our American home, however, Berkshire would never have come close to becoming what it is today. When you see the flag, say thanks.</p><p>• From an $8.6 million purchase of National Indemnity in 1967, Berkshire has become the world leader in insurance “float” – money we hold and can invest but that does not belong to us. Including a relatively small sum derived from life insurance, Berkshire’s total float has grown from $19 million when we entered the insurance business to $147 billion.</p><p>So far, this float has cost us less than nothing. Though we have experienced a number of years when insurance losses combined with operating expenses exceeded premiums, overall we have earned a modest 55-year profit from the underwriting activities that generated our float.</p><p>Of equal importance, float is very sticky. Funds attributable to our insurance operations come and go daily, but their aggregate total is immune from precipitous decline. When it comes to investing float, we can therefore think long-term.</p><p>If you are not already familiar with the concept of float, I refer you to a long explanation on page A-5. To my surprise, our float increased $9 billion last year, a buildup of value that is important to Berkshire owners though is not reflected in our GAAP (“generally-accepted accounting principles”) presentation of earnings and net worth.</p><p>Much of our huge value creation in insurance is attributable to Berkshire’s good luck in my 1986 hiring of Ajit Jain. We first met on a Saturday morning, and I quickly asked Ajit what his insurance experience had been. He replied, “None.”</p><p>I said, “Nobody’s perfect,” and hired him. That was my lucky day: Ajit actually was as perfect a choice as could have been made. Better yet, he continues to be – 35 years later.</p><p>One final thought about insurance: I believe that it is likely – but far from assured – that Berkshire’s float can be maintained without our incurring a long-term underwriting loss. I am certain, however, that there will be some years when we experience such losses, perhaps involving very large sums.</p><p>Berkshire is constructed to handle catastrophic events as no other insurer – and that priority will remain long after Charlie and I are gone.</p><h2>Our Four Giants</h2><p>Through Berkshire, our shareholders own many dozens of businesses. Some of these, in turn, have a collection of subsidiaries of their own. For example, Marmon has more than 100 individual business operations, ranging from the leasing of railroad cars to the manufacture of medical devices.</p><p>• Nevertheless, operations of our “Big Four” companies account for a very large chunk of Berkshire’s value. Leading this list is our cluster of insurers. Berkshire effectively owns 100% of this group, whose massive float value we earlier described. The invested assets of these insurers are further enlarged by the extraordinary amount of capital we invest to back up their promises.</p><p>The insurance business is made to order for Berkshire. The product will never be obsolete, and sales volume will generally increase along with both economic growth and inflation. Also, integrity and capital will forever be important. Our company can and will behave well.</p><p>There are, of course, other insurers with excellent business models and prospects. Replication of Berkshire’s operation, however, would be almost impossible.</p><p>• Apple – our runner-up Giant as measured by its yearend market value – is a different sort of holding. Here, our ownership is a mere 5.55%, up from 5.39% a year earlier. That increase sounds like small potatoes. But consider that each 0.1% of Apple’s 2021 earnings amounted to $100 million. We spent no Berkshire funds to gain our accretion. Apple’s repurchases did the job.</p><p>It’s important to understand that only dividends from Apple are counted in the GAAP earnings Berkshire reports – and last year, Apple paid us $785 million of those. Yet our “share” of Apple’s earnings amounted to a staggering $5.6 billion. Much of what the company retained was used to repurchase Apple shares, an act we applaud. Tim Cook, Apple’s brilliant CEO, quite properly regards users of Apple products as his first love, but all of his other constituencies benefit from Tim’s managerial touch as well.</p><p>• BNSF, our third Giant, continues to be the number one artery of American commerce, which makes it an indispensable asset for America as well as for Berkshire. If the many essential products BNSF carries were instead hauled by truck, America’s carbon emissions would soar.</p><p>Your railroad had record earnings of $6 billion in 2021. Here, it should be noted, we are talking about the old-fashioned sort of earnings that we favor: a figure calculated after interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization and all forms of compensation. (Our definition suggests a warning: Deceptive “adjustments” to earnings – to use a polite description – have become both more frequent and more fanciful as stocks have risen. Speaking less politely, I would say that bull markets breed bloviated bull )</p><p>BNSF trains traveled 143 million miles last year and carried 535 million tons of cargo. Both accomplishments far exceed those of any other American carrier. You can be proud of your railroad.</p><p>• BHE, our final Giant, earned a record $4 billion in 2021. That’s up more than 30-fold from the $122 million earned in 2000, the year that Berkshire first purchased a BHE stake. Now, Berkshire owns 91.1% of the company.</p><p>BHE’s record of societal accomplishment is as remarkable as its financial performance. The company had no wind or solar generation in 2000. It was then regarded simply as a relatively new and minor participant in the huge electric utility industry. Subsequently, under David Sokol’s and Greg Abel’s leadership, BHE has become a utility powerhouse (no groaning, please) and a leading force in wind, solar and transmission throughout much of the United States.</p><p>Greg’s report on these accomplishments appears on pages A-3 and A-4. The profile you will find there is not in any way one of those currently-fashionable “green-washing” stories. BHE has been faithfully detailing its plans and performance in renewables and transmissions every year since 2007.</p><p>To further review this information, visit BHE’s website at brkenergy.com. There, you will see that the company has long been making climate-conscious moves that soak up all of its earnings. More opportunities lie ahead. BHE has the management, the experience, the capital and the appetite for the huge power projects that our country needs.</p><h2>Investments</h2><p>Now let’s talk about companies we don’t control, a list that again references Apple. Below we list our fifteen largest equity holdings, several of which are selections of Berkshire’s two long-time investment managers, Todd Combs and Ted Weschler. At yearend, this valued pair had total authority in respect to $34 billion of investments, many of which do not meet the threshold value we use in the table. Also, a significant portion of the dollars that Todd and Ted manage are lodged in various pension plans of Berkshire-owned businesses, with the assets of these plans not included in this table.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d43587e9f59c0ff76e6c04c6bf9af324\" tg-width=\"1047\" tg-height=\"530\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/>* This is our actual purchase price and also our tax basis.</p><p>** Held by BHE; consequently, Berkshire shareholders have only a 91.1% interest in this position.</p><p>*** Includes a $10 billion investment in Occidental Petroleum, consisting of preferred stock and warrants to buy common stock, a combination now being valued at $10.7 billion.</p><p>In addition to the footnoted Occidental holding and our various common-stock positions, Berkshire also owns a 26.6% interest in Kraft Heinz (accounted for on the “equity” method, not market value, and carried at $13.1 billion) and 38.6% of Pilot Corp., a leader in travel centers that had revenues last year of $45 billion.</p><p>Since we purchased our Pilot stake in 2017, this holding has warranted “equity” accounting treatment. Early in 2023, Berkshire will purchase an additional interest in Pilot that will raise our ownership to 80% and lead to our fully consolidating Pilot’s earnings, assets and liabilities in our financial statements.</p><h2>U.S. Treasury Bills</h2><p>Berkshire’s balance sheet includes $144 billion of cash and cash equivalents (excluding the holdings of BNSF and BHE). Of this sum, $120 billion is held in U.S. Treasury bills, all maturing in less than a year. That stake leaves Berkshire financing about 12 of 1% of the publicly-held national debt.</p><p>Charlie and I have pledged that Berkshire (along with our subsidiaries other than BNSF and BHE) will always hold more than $30 billion of cash and equivalents. We want your company to be financially impregnable and never dependent on the kindness of strangers (or even that of friends). Both of us like to sleep soundly, and we want our creditors, insurance claimants and you to do so as well.</p><h2>But $144 billion?</h2><p>That imposing sum, I assure you, is not some deranged expression of patriotism. Nor have Charlie and I lost our overwhelming preference for business ownership. Indeed, I first manifested my enthusiasm for that 80 years ago, on March 11, 1942, when I purchased three shares of Cities Services preferred stock. Their cost was $114.75 and required all of my savings. (The Dow Jones Industrial Average that day closed at 99, a fact that should scream to you: Never bet against America.)</p><p>After my initial plunge, I always kept at least 80% of my net worth in equities. My favored status throughout that period was 100% – and still is. Berkshire’s current 80%-or-so position in businesses is a consequence of my failure to find entire companies or small portions thereof (that is, marketable stocks) which meet our criteria for long- term holding.</p><p>Charlie and I have endured similar cash-heavy positions from time to time in the past. These periods are never pleasant; they are also never permanent. And, fortunately, we have had a mildly attractive alternative during 2020 and 2021 for deploying capital. Read on.</p><h2>Share Repurchases</h2><p>There are three ways that we can increase the value of your investment. The first is always front and center in our minds: Increase the long-term earning power of Berkshire’s controlled businesses through internal growth or by making acquisitions. Today, internal opportunities deliver far better returns than acquisitions. The size of those opportunities, however, is small compared to Berkshire’s resources.</p><p>Our second choice is to buy non-controlling part-interests in the many good or great businesses that are publicly traded. From time to time, such possibilities are both numerous and blatantly attractive. Today, though, we find little that excites us.</p><p>That’s largely because of a truism: Long-term interest rates that are low push the prices of all productive investments upward, whether these are stocks, apartments, farms, oil wells, whatever. Other factors influence valuations as well, but interest rates will always be important.</p><p>Our final path to value creation is to repurchase Berkshire shares. Through that simple act, we increase your share of the many controlled and non-controlled businesses Berkshire owns. When the price/value equation is right, this path is the easiest and most certain way for us to increase your wealth. (Alongside the accretion of value to continuing shareholders, a couple of other parties gain: Repurchases are modestly beneficial to the seller of the repurchased shares and to society as well.)</p><p>Periodically, as alternative paths become unattractive, repurchases make good sense for Berkshire’s owners. During the past two years, we therefore repurchased 9% of the shares that were outstanding at yearend 2019 for a total cost of $51.7 billion. That expenditure left our continuing shareholders owning about 10% more of all Berkshire businesses, whether these are wholly-owned (such as BNSF and GEICO) or partly-owned (such as Coca-Cola and Moody’s).</p><p>I want to underscore that for Berkshire repurchases to make sense, our shares must offer appropriate value. We don’t want to overpay for the shares of other companies, and it would be value-destroying if we were to overpay when we are buying Berkshire. As of February 23, 2022, since yearend we repurchased additional shares at a cost of $1.2 billion. Our appetite remains large but will always remain price-dependent.</p><p>It should be noted that Berkshire’s buyback opportunities are limited because of its high-class investor base. If our shares were heavily held by short-term speculators, both price volatility and transaction volumes would materially increase. That kind of reshaping would offer us far greater opportunities for creating value by making repurchases. Nevertheless, Charlie and I far prefer the owners we have, even though their admirable buy-and-keep attitudes limit the extent to which long-term shareholders can profit from opportunistic repurchases.</p><p>Finally, one easily-overlooked value calculation specific to Berkshire: As we’ve discussed, insurance “float” of the right sort is of great value to us. As it happens, repurchases automatically increase the amount of “float” per share. That figure has increased during the past two years by 25% – going from $79,387 per “A” share to $99,497, a meaningful gain that, as noted, owes some thanks to repurchases.</p><h2>A Wonderful Man and a Wonderful Business</h2><p>Last year, Paul Andrews died. Paul was the founder and CEO of TTI, a Fort Worth-based subsidiary of Berkshire. Throughout his life – in both his business and his personal pursuits – Paul quietly displayed all the qualities that Charlie and I admire. His story should be told.</p><p>In 1971, Paul was working as a purchasing agent for General Dynamics when the roof fell in. After losing a huge defense contract, the company fired thousands of employees, including Paul.</p><p>With his first child due soon, Paul decided to bet on himself, using $500 of his savings to found Tex-Tronics (later renamed TTI). The company set itself up to distribute small electronic components, and first-year sales totaled $112,000. Today, TTI markets more than one million different items with annual volume of $7.7 billion.</p><p>But back to 2006: Paul, at 63, then found himself happy with his family, his job, and his associates. But he had one nagging worry, heightened because he had recently witnessed a friend’s early death and the disastrous results that followed for that man’s family and business. What, Paul asked himself in 2006, would happen to the many people depending on him if he should unexpectedly die?</p><p>For a year, Paul wrestled with his options. Sell to a competitor? From a strictly economic viewpoint, that course made the most sense. After all, competitors could envision lucrative “synergies” – savings that would be achieved as the acquiror slashed duplicated functions at TTI.</p><p>But . . . Such a purchaser would most certainly also retain its CFO, its legal counsel, its HR unit. Their TTI counterparts would therefore be sent packing. And ugh! If a new distribution center were to be needed, the acquirer’s home city would certainly be favored over Fort Worth.</p><p>Whatever the financial benefits, Paul quickly concluded that selling to a competitor was not for him. He next considered seeking a financial buyer, a species once labeled – aptly so – a leveraged buyout firm. Paul knew, however, that such a purchaser would be focused on an “exit strategy.” And who could know what that would be? Brooding over it all, Paul found himself having no interest in handing his 35-year-old creation over to a reseller.</p><p>When Paul met me, he explained why he had eliminated these two alternatives as buyers. He then summed up his dilemma by saying – in far more tactful phrasing than this – “After a year of pondering the alternatives, I want to sell to Berkshire because you are the only guy left.” So, I made an offer and Paul said “Yes.” One meeting; one lunch; one deal.</p><p>To say we both lived happily ever after is an understatement. When Berkshire purchased TTI, the company employed 2,387. Now the number is 8,043. A large percentage of that growth took place in Fort Worth and environs. Earnings have increased 673%.</p><p>Annually, I would call Paul and tell him his salary should be substantially increased. Annually, he would tell me, “We can talk about that next year, Warren; I’m too busy now.”</p><p>When Greg Abel and I attended Paul’s memorial service, we met children, grandchildren, long-time associates (including TTI’s first employee) and John Roach, the former CEO of a Fort Worth company Berkshire had purchased in 2000. John had steered his friend Paul to Omaha, instinctively knowing we would be a match.</p><p>At the service, Greg and I heard about the multitudes of people and organizations that Paul had silently supported. The breadth of his generosity was extraordinary – geared always to improving the lives of others, particularly those in Fort Worth.</p><p>In all ways, Paul was a class act.</p><p>* * * * * * * * * * * *</p><p>Good luck – occasionally extraordinary luck – has played its part at Berkshire. If Paul and I had not enjoyed a mutual friend – John Roach – TTI would not have found its home with us. But that ample serving of luck was only the beginning. TTI was soon to lead Berkshire to its most important acquisition.</p><p>Every fall, Berkshire directors gather for a presentation by a few of our executives. We sometimes choose the site based upon the location of a recent acquisition, by that means allowing directors to meet the new subsidiary’s CEO and learn more about the acquiree’s activities.</p><p>In the fall of 2009, we consequently selected Fort Worth so that we could visit TTI. At that time, BNSF, which also had Fort Worth as its hometown, was the third-largest holding among our marketable equities. Despite that large stake, I had never visited the railroad’s headquarters.</p><p>Deb Bosanek, my assistant, scheduled our board’s opening dinner for October 22. Meanwhile, I arranged to arrive earlier that day to meet with Matt Rose, CEO of BNSF, whose accomplishments I had long admired. When I made the date, I had no idea that our get-together would coincide with BNSF’s third-quarter earnings report, which was released late on the 22nd.</p><p>The market reacted badly to the railroad’s results. The Great Recession was in full force in the third quarter, and BNSF’s earnings reflected that slump. The economic outlook was also bleak, and Wall Street wasn’t feeling friendly to railroads – or much else.</p><p>On the following day, I again got together with Matt and suggested that Berkshire would offer the railroad a better long-term home than it could expect as a public company. I also told him the maximum price that Berkshire would pay.</p><p>Matt relayed the offer to his directors and advisors. Eleven busy days later, Berkshire and BNSF announced a firm deal. And here I’ll venture a rare prediction: BNSF will be a key asset for Berkshire and our country a century from now.</p><p>The BNSF acquisition would never have happened if Paul Andrews hadn’t sized up Berkshire as the right home for TTI.</p><h2>Thanks</h2><p>I taught my first investing class 70 years ago. Since then, I have enjoyed working almost every year with students of all ages, finally “retiring” from that pursuit in 2018.</p><p>Along the way, my toughest audience was my grandson’s fifth-grade class. The 11-year-olds were squirming in their seats and giving me blank stares until I mentioned Coca-Cola and its famous secret formula. Instantly, every hand went up, and I learned that “secrets” are catnip to kids.</p><p>Teaching, like writing, has helped me develop and clarify my own thoughts. Charlie calls this phenomenon the orangutan effect: If you sit down with an orangutan and carefully explain to it one of your cherished ideas, you may leave behind a puzzled primate, but will yourself exit thinking more clearly.</p><p>Talking to university students is far superior. I have urged that they seek employment in (1) the field and (2) with the kind of people they would select, if they had no need for money. Economic realities, I acknowledge, may interfere with that kind of search. Even so, I urge the students never to give up the quest, for when they find that sort of job, they will no longer be “working.”</p><p>Charlie and I, ourselves, followed that liberating course after a few early stumbles. We both started as part- timers at my grandfather’s grocery store, Charlie in 1940 and I in 1942. We were each assigned boring tasks and paid little, definitely not what we had in mind. Charlie later took up law, and I tried selling securities. Job satisfaction continued to elude us.</p><p>Finally, at Berkshire, we found what we love to do. With very few exceptions, we have now “worked” for many decades with people whom we like and trust. It’s a joy in life to join with managers such as Paul Andrews or the Berkshire families I told you about last year. In our home office, we employ decent and talented people – no jerks. Turnover averages, perhaps, one person per year.</p><p>I would like, however, to emphasize a further item that turns our jobs into fun and satisfaction working</p><p>for you. There is nothing more rewarding to Charlie and me than enjoying the trust of individual long-term shareholders who, for many decades, have joined us with the expectation that we would be a reliable custodian of their funds.</p><p>Obviously, we can’t select our owners, as we could do if our form of operation were a partnership. Anyone can buy shares of Berkshire today with the intention of soon reselling them. For sure, we get a few of that type of shareholder, just as we get index funds that own huge amounts of Berkshire simply because they are required to do so.</p><p>To a truly unusual degree, however, Berkshire has as owners a very large corps of individuals and families that have elected to join us with an intent approaching “til death do us part.” Often, they have trusted us with a large – some might say excessive – portion of their savings.</p><p>Berkshire, these shareholders would sometimes acknowledge, might be far from the best selection they could have made. But they would add that Berkshire would rank high among those with which they would be most comfortable. And people who are comfortable with their investments will, on average, achieve better results than those who are motivated by ever-changing headlines, chatter and promises.</p><p>Long-term individual owners are both the “partners” Charlie and I have always sought and the ones we constantly have in mind as we make decisions at Berkshire. To them we say, “It feels good to ‘work’ for you, and you have our thanks for your trust.”</p><h2>The Annual Meeting</h2><p>Clear your calendar! Berkshire will have its annual gathering of capitalists in Omaha on Friday, April 29th through Sunday, May 1st. The details regarding the weekend are laid out on pages A-1 and A-2. Omaha eagerly awaits you, as do I.</p><p>I will end this letter with a sales pitch. “Cousin” Jimmy Buffett has designed a pontoon “party” boat that is now being manufactured by Forest River, a Berkshire subsidiary. The boat will be introduced on April 29 at our Berkshire Bazaar of Bargains. And, for two days only, shareholders will be able to purchase Jimmy’s masterpiece at a 10% discount. Your bargain-hunting chairman will be buying a boat for his family’s use. Join me.</p><p>February 26, 2022</p><p>Warren E. Buffett Chairman of the Board</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BRK.A":"伯克希尔","BRK.B":"伯克希尔B"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1125580913","content_text":"Warren Buffett released his annual letter to Berkshire Hathaway shareholders on Saturday. The 91-year-old investing legend has been publishing the letter for over six decades and it has become required reading for investors around the world.Warren Buffett said he now considers tech giant Apple as one of the four pillars driving Berkshire Hathaway, the conglomerate of mostly old-economy businesses he’s assembled over the last five decades.In his annual letter to shareholders released on Saturday, the 91-year-old investing legend listed Apple under the heading “Our Four Giants” and even called the company the second-most important after Berkshire’s cluster of insurers, thanks to its chief executive.“Tim Cook, Apple’s brilliant CEO, quite properly regards users of Apple products as his first love, but all of his other constituencies benefit from Tim’s managerial touch as well,” the letter stated.Buffett made clear he is a fan of Cook’s stock repurchase strategy, and how it gives the conglomerate increased ownership of each dollar of the iPhone maker’s earnings without the investor having to lift a finger.“Apple – our runner-up Giant as measured by its yearend market value – is a different sort of holding. Here, our ownership is a mere 5.55%, up from 5.39% a year earlier,” Buffett said in the letter. “That increase sounds like small potatoes. But consider that each 0.1% of Apple’s 2021 earnings amounted to $100 million. We spent no Berkshire funds to gain our accretion. Apple’s repurchases did the job.”Berkshire began buying Apple stock in 2016 under the influence of Buffett’s investing deputies Todd Combs and Ted Weschler. By mid-2018, the conglomerate accumulated 5% ownership of the iPhone maker, a stake that cost $36 billion. Today, the Apple investment is now worth more than $160 billion, taking up 40% of Berkshire’s equity portfolio.“It’s important to understand that only dividends from Apple are counted in the GAAP earnings Berkshire reports – and last year, Apple paid us $785 million of those. Yet our ‘share’ of Apple’s earnings amounted to a staggering $5.6 billion. Much of what the company retained was used to repurchase Apple shares, an act we applaud,” Buffett said.Berkshire is Apple’s largest shareholder, outside of index and exchange-traded fund providers.Buffett also credited his railroad business BNSF and energy segment BHE as two other giants of the conglomerate, which both registered record earnings in 2021.“BNSF, our third Giant, continues to be the number one artery of American commerce, which makes it an indispensable asset for America as well as for Berkshire,” Buffett said. “BHE has become a utility powerhouse and a leading force in wind, solar and transmission throughout much of the United States.”Read the full letter here：To the Shareholders of Berkshire Hathaway Inc.:Charlie Munger, my long-time partner, and I have the job of managing a portion of your savings. We are honored by your trust.Our position carries with it the responsibility to report to you what we would like to know if we were the absentee owner and you were the manager. We enjoy communicating directly with you through this annual letter, and through the annual meeting as well.Our policy is to treat all shareholders equally. Therefore, we do not hold discussions with analysts nor large institutions. Whenever possible, also, we release important communications on Saturday mornings in order to maximize the time for shareholders and the media to absorb the news before markets open on Monday.A wealth of Berkshire facts and figures are set forth in the annual 10-K that the company regularly files with the S.E.C. and that we reproduce on pages K-1 – K-119. Some shareholders will find this detail engrossing; others will simply prefer to learn what Charlie and I believe is new or interesting at Berkshire.Alas, there was little action of that sort in 2021. We did, though, make reasonable progress in increasing the intrinsic value of your shares. That task has been my primary duty for 57 years. And it will continue to be.What You OwnBerkshire owns a wide variety of businesses, some in their entirety, some only in part. The second group largely consists of marketable common stocks of major American companies. Additionally, we own a few non-U.S. equities and participate in several joint ventures or other collaborative activities.Whatever our form of ownership, our goal is to have meaningful investments in businesses with both durable economic advantages and a first-class CEO. Please note particularly that we own stocks based upon our expectations about their long-term business performance and not because we view them as vehicles for timely market moves. That point is crucial: Charlie and I are not stock-pickers; we are business-pickers.I make many mistakes. Consequently, our extensive collection of businesses includes some enterprises that have truly extraordinary economics, many others that enjoy good economic characteristics, and a few that are marginal. One advantage of our common-stock segment is that – on occasion – it becomes easy to buy pieces of wonderful businesses at wonderful prices. That shooting-fish-in-a-barrel experience is very rare in negotiated transactions and never occurs en masse. It is also far easier to exit from a mistake when it has been made in the marketable arena.Surprise, SurpriseHere are a few items about your company that often surprise even seasoned investors:• Many people perceive Berkshire as a large and somewhat strange collection of financial assets. In truth, Berkshire owns and operates more U.S.-based “infrastructure” assets – classified on our balance sheet as property, plant and equipment – than are owned and operated by any other American corporation. That supremacy has never been our goal. It has, however, become a fact.At yearend, those domestic infrastructure assets were carried on Berkshire’s balance sheet at $158 billion. That number increased last year and will continue to increase. Berkshire always will be building.• Every year, your company makes substantial federal income tax payments. In 2021, for example, we paid$3.3 billion while the U.S. Treasury reported total corporate income-tax receipts of $402 billion. Additionally, Berkshire pays substantial state and foreign taxes. “I gave at the office” is an unassailable assertion when made by Berkshire shareholders.Berkshire’s history vividly illustrates the invisible and often unrecognized financial partnership between  government and American businesses. Our tale begins early in 1955, when Berkshire Fine Spinning and Hathaway Manufacturing agreed to merge their businesses. In their requests for shareholder approval, these venerable New England textile companies expressed high hopes for the combination.The Hathaway solicitation, for example, assured its shareholders that “The combination of the resources and managements will result in one of the strongest and most efficient organizations in the textile industry.” That upbeat view was endorsed by the company’s advisor, Lehman Brothers (yes, that Lehman Brothers).I’m sure it was a joyous day in both Fall River (Berkshire) and New Bedford (Hathaway) when the union was consummated. After the bands stopped playing and the bankers went home, however, the shareholders reaped a disaster.In the nine years following the merger, Berkshire’s owners watched the company’s net worth crater from$51.4 million to $22.1 million. In part, this decline was caused by stock repurchases, ill-advised dividends and plant shutdowns. But nine years of effort by many thousands of employees delivered an operating loss as well. Berkshire’s struggles were not unusual: The New England textile industry had silently entered an extended and non-reversible death march.During the nine post-merger years, the U.S. Treasury suffered as well from Berkshire’s troubles. All told, the company paid the government only $337,359 in income tax during that period – a pathetic $100 per day.Early in 1965, things changed. Berkshire installed new management that redeployed available cash and steered essentially all earnings into a variety of good businesses, most of which remained good through the years. Coupling reinvestment of earnings with the power of compounding worked its magic, and shareholders prospered.Berkshire’s owners, it should be noted, were not the only beneficiary of that course correction. Their “silent partner,” the U.S. Treasury, proceeded to collect many tens of billions of dollars from the company in income tax payments. Remember the $100 daily? Now, Berkshire pays roughly $9 million daily to the Treasury.In fairness to our governmental partner, our shareholders should acknowledge – indeed trumpet – the fact that Berkshire’s prosperity has been fostered mightily because the company has operated in America. Our country would have done splendidly in the years since 1965 without Berkshire. Absent our American home, however, Berkshire would never have come close to becoming what it is today. When you see the flag, say thanks.• From an $8.6 million purchase of National Indemnity in 1967, Berkshire has become the world leader in insurance “float” – money we hold and can invest but that does not belong to us. Including a relatively small sum derived from life insurance, Berkshire’s total float has grown from $19 million when we entered the insurance business to $147 billion.So far, this float has cost us less than nothing. Though we have experienced a number of years when insurance losses combined with operating expenses exceeded premiums, overall we have earned a modest 55-year profit from the underwriting activities that generated our float.Of equal importance, float is very sticky. Funds attributable to our insurance operations come and go daily, but their aggregate total is immune from precipitous decline. When it comes to investing float, we can therefore think long-term.If you are not already familiar with the concept of float, I refer you to a long explanation on page A-5. To my surprise, our float increased $9 billion last year, a buildup of value that is important to Berkshire owners though is not reflected in our GAAP (“generally-accepted accounting principles”) presentation of earnings and net worth.Much of our huge value creation in insurance is attributable to Berkshire’s good luck in my 1986 hiring of Ajit Jain. We first met on a Saturday morning, and I quickly asked Ajit what his insurance experience had been. He replied, “None.”I said, “Nobody’s perfect,” and hired him. That was my lucky day: Ajit actually was as perfect a choice as could have been made. Better yet, he continues to be – 35 years later.One final thought about insurance: I believe that it is likely – but far from assured – that Berkshire’s float can be maintained without our incurring a long-term underwriting loss. I am certain, however, that there will be some years when we experience such losses, perhaps involving very large sums.Berkshire is constructed to handle catastrophic events as no other insurer – and that priority will remain long after Charlie and I are gone.Our Four GiantsThrough Berkshire, our shareholders own many dozens of businesses. Some of these, in turn, have a collection of subsidiaries of their own. For example, Marmon has more than 100 individual business operations, ranging from the leasing of railroad cars to the manufacture of medical devices.• Nevertheless, operations of our “Big Four” companies account for a very large chunk of Berkshire’s value. Leading this list is our cluster of insurers. Berkshire effectively owns 100% of this group, whose massive float value we earlier described. The invested assets of these insurers are further enlarged by the extraordinary amount of capital we invest to back up their promises.The insurance business is made to order for Berkshire. The product will never be obsolete, and sales volume will generally increase along with both economic growth and inflation. Also, integrity and capital will forever be important. Our company can and will behave well.There are, of course, other insurers with excellent business models and prospects. Replication of Berkshire’s operation, however, would be almost impossible.• Apple – our runner-up Giant as measured by its yearend market value – is a different sort of holding. Here, our ownership is a mere 5.55%, up from 5.39% a year earlier. That increase sounds like small potatoes. But consider that each 0.1% of Apple’s 2021 earnings amounted to $100 million. We spent no Berkshire funds to gain our accretion. Apple’s repurchases did the job.It’s important to understand that only dividends from Apple are counted in the GAAP earnings Berkshire reports – and last year, Apple paid us $785 million of those. Yet our “share” of Apple’s earnings amounted to a staggering $5.6 billion. Much of what the company retained was used to repurchase Apple shares, an act we applaud. Tim Cook, Apple’s brilliant CEO, quite properly regards users of Apple products as his first love, but all of his other constituencies benefit from Tim’s managerial touch as well.• BNSF, our third Giant, continues to be the number one artery of American commerce, which makes it an indispensable asset for America as well as for Berkshire. If the many essential products BNSF carries were instead hauled by truck, America’s carbon emissions would soar.Your railroad had record earnings of $6 billion in 2021. Here, it should be noted, we are talking about the old-fashioned sort of earnings that we favor: a figure calculated after interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization and all forms of compensation. (Our definition suggests a warning: Deceptive “adjustments” to earnings – to use a polite description – have become both more frequent and more fanciful as stocks have risen. Speaking less politely, I would say that bull markets breed bloviated bull )BNSF trains traveled 143 million miles last year and carried 535 million tons of cargo. Both accomplishments far exceed those of any other American carrier. You can be proud of your railroad.• BHE, our final Giant, earned a record $4 billion in 2021. That’s up more than 30-fold from the $122 million earned in 2000, the year that Berkshire first purchased a BHE stake. Now, Berkshire owns 91.1% of the company.BHE’s record of societal accomplishment is as remarkable as its financial performance. The company had no wind or solar generation in 2000. It was then regarded simply as a relatively new and minor participant in the huge electric utility industry. Subsequently, under David Sokol’s and Greg Abel’s leadership, BHE has become a utility powerhouse (no groaning, please) and a leading force in wind, solar and transmission throughout much of the United States.Greg’s report on these accomplishments appears on pages A-3 and A-4. The profile you will find there is not in any way one of those currently-fashionable “green-washing” stories. BHE has been faithfully detailing its plans and performance in renewables and transmissions every year since 2007.To further review this information, visit BHE’s website at brkenergy.com. There, you will see that the company has long been making climate-conscious moves that soak up all of its earnings. More opportunities lie ahead. BHE has the management, the experience, the capital and the appetite for the huge power projects that our country needs.InvestmentsNow let’s talk about companies we don’t control, a list that again references Apple. Below we list our fifteen largest equity holdings, several of which are selections of Berkshire’s two long-time investment managers, Todd Combs and Ted Weschler. At yearend, this valued pair had total authority in respect to $34 billion of investments, many of which do not meet the threshold value we use in the table. Also, a significant portion of the dollars that Todd and Ted manage are lodged in various pension plans of Berkshire-owned businesses, with the assets of these plans not included in this table.* This is our actual purchase price and also our tax basis.** Held by BHE; consequently, Berkshire shareholders have only a 91.1% interest in this position.*** Includes a $10 billion investment in Occidental Petroleum, consisting of preferred stock and warrants to buy common stock, a combination now being valued at $10.7 billion.In addition to the footnoted Occidental holding and our various common-stock positions, Berkshire also owns a 26.6% interest in Kraft Heinz (accounted for on the “equity” method, not market value, and carried at $13.1 billion) and 38.6% of Pilot Corp., a leader in travel centers that had revenues last year of $45 billion.Since we purchased our Pilot stake in 2017, this holding has warranted “equity” accounting treatment. Early in 2023, Berkshire will purchase an additional interest in Pilot that will raise our ownership to 80% and lead to our fully consolidating Pilot’s earnings, assets and liabilities in our financial statements.U.S. Treasury BillsBerkshire’s balance sheet includes $144 billion of cash and cash equivalents (excluding the holdings of BNSF and BHE). Of this sum, $120 billion is held in U.S. Treasury bills, all maturing in less than a year. That stake leaves Berkshire financing about 12 of 1% of the publicly-held national debt.Charlie and I have pledged that Berkshire (along with our subsidiaries other than BNSF and BHE) will always hold more than $30 billion of cash and equivalents. We want your company to be financially impregnable and never dependent on the kindness of strangers (or even that of friends). Both of us like to sleep soundly, and we want our creditors, insurance claimants and you to do so as well.But $144 billion?That imposing sum, I assure you, is not some deranged expression of patriotism. Nor have Charlie and I lost our overwhelming preference for business ownership. Indeed, I first manifested my enthusiasm for that 80 years ago, on March 11, 1942, when I purchased three shares of Cities Services preferred stock. Their cost was $114.75 and required all of my savings. (The Dow Jones Industrial Average that day closed at 99, a fact that should scream to you: Never bet against America.)After my initial plunge, I always kept at least 80% of my net worth in equities. My favored status throughout that period was 100% – and still is. Berkshire’s current 80%-or-so position in businesses is a consequence of my failure to find entire companies or small portions thereof (that is, marketable stocks) which meet our criteria for long- term holding.Charlie and I have endured similar cash-heavy positions from time to time in the past. These periods are never pleasant; they are also never permanent. And, fortunately, we have had a mildly attractive alternative during 2020 and 2021 for deploying capital. Read on.Share RepurchasesThere are three ways that we can increase the value of your investment. The first is always front and center in our minds: Increase the long-term earning power of Berkshire’s controlled businesses through internal growth or by making acquisitions. Today, internal opportunities deliver far better returns than acquisitions. The size of those opportunities, however, is small compared to Berkshire’s resources.Our second choice is to buy non-controlling part-interests in the many good or great businesses that are publicly traded. From time to time, such possibilities are both numerous and blatantly attractive. Today, though, we find little that excites us.That’s largely because of a truism: Long-term interest rates that are low push the prices of all productive investments upward, whether these are stocks, apartments, farms, oil wells, whatever. Other factors influence valuations as well, but interest rates will always be important.Our final path to value creation is to repurchase Berkshire shares. Through that simple act, we increase your share of the many controlled and non-controlled businesses Berkshire owns. When the price/value equation is right, this path is the easiest and most certain way for us to increase your wealth. (Alongside the accretion of value to continuing shareholders, a couple of other parties gain: Repurchases are modestly beneficial to the seller of the repurchased shares and to society as well.)Periodically, as alternative paths become unattractive, repurchases make good sense for Berkshire’s owners. During the past two years, we therefore repurchased 9% of the shares that were outstanding at yearend 2019 for a total cost of $51.7 billion. That expenditure left our continuing shareholders owning about 10% more of all Berkshire businesses, whether these are wholly-owned (such as BNSF and GEICO) or partly-owned (such as Coca-Cola and Moody’s).I want to underscore that for Berkshire repurchases to make sense, our shares must offer appropriate value. We don’t want to overpay for the shares of other companies, and it would be value-destroying if we were to overpay when we are buying Berkshire. As of February 23, 2022, since yearend we repurchased additional shares at a cost of $1.2 billion. Our appetite remains large but will always remain price-dependent.It should be noted that Berkshire’s buyback opportunities are limited because of its high-class investor base. If our shares were heavily held by short-term speculators, both price volatility and transaction volumes would materially increase. That kind of reshaping would offer us far greater opportunities for creating value by making repurchases. Nevertheless, Charlie and I far prefer the owners we have, even though their admirable buy-and-keep attitudes limit the extent to which long-term shareholders can profit from opportunistic repurchases.Finally, one easily-overlooked value calculation specific to Berkshire: As we’ve discussed, insurance “float” of the right sort is of great value to us. As it happens, repurchases automatically increase the amount of “float” per share. That figure has increased during the past two years by 25% – going from $79,387 per “A” share to $99,497, a meaningful gain that, as noted, owes some thanks to repurchases.A Wonderful Man and a Wonderful BusinessLast year, Paul Andrews died. Paul was the founder and CEO of TTI, a Fort Worth-based subsidiary of Berkshire. Throughout his life – in both his business and his personal pursuits – Paul quietly displayed all the qualities that Charlie and I admire. His story should be told.In 1971, Paul was working as a purchasing agent for General Dynamics when the roof fell in. After losing a huge defense contract, the company fired thousands of employees, including Paul.With his first child due soon, Paul decided to bet on himself, using $500 of his savings to found Tex-Tronics (later renamed TTI). The company set itself up to distribute small electronic components, and first-year sales totaled $112,000. Today, TTI markets more than one million different items with annual volume of $7.7 billion.But back to 2006: Paul, at 63, then found himself happy with his family, his job, and his associates. But he had one nagging worry, heightened because he had recently witnessed a friend’s early death and the disastrous results that followed for that man’s family and business. What, Paul asked himself in 2006, would happen to the many people depending on him if he should unexpectedly die?For a year, Paul wrestled with his options. Sell to a competitor? From a strictly economic viewpoint, that course made the most sense. After all, competitors could envision lucrative “synergies” – savings that would be achieved as the acquiror slashed duplicated functions at TTI.But . . . Such a purchaser would most certainly also retain its CFO, its legal counsel, its HR unit. Their TTI counterparts would therefore be sent packing. And ugh! If a new distribution center were to be needed, the acquirer’s home city would certainly be favored over Fort Worth.Whatever the financial benefits, Paul quickly concluded that selling to a competitor was not for him. He next considered seeking a financial buyer, a species once labeled – aptly so – a leveraged buyout firm. Paul knew, however, that such a purchaser would be focused on an “exit strategy.” And who could know what that would be? Brooding over it all, Paul found himself having no interest in handing his 35-year-old creation over to a reseller.When Paul met me, he explained why he had eliminated these two alternatives as buyers. He then summed up his dilemma by saying – in far more tactful phrasing than this – “After a year of pondering the alternatives, I want to sell to Berkshire because you are the only guy left.” So, I made an offer and Paul said “Yes.” One meeting; one lunch; one deal.To say we both lived happily ever after is an understatement. When Berkshire purchased TTI, the company employed 2,387. Now the number is 8,043. A large percentage of that growth took place in Fort Worth and environs. Earnings have increased 673%.Annually, I would call Paul and tell him his salary should be substantially increased. Annually, he would tell me, “We can talk about that next year, Warren; I’m too busy now.”When Greg Abel and I attended Paul’s memorial service, we met children, grandchildren, long-time associates (including TTI’s first employee) and John Roach, the former CEO of a Fort Worth company Berkshire had purchased in 2000. John had steered his friend Paul to Omaha, instinctively knowing we would be a match.At the service, Greg and I heard about the multitudes of people and organizations that Paul had silently supported. The breadth of his generosity was extraordinary – geared always to improving the lives of others, particularly those in Fort Worth.In all ways, Paul was a class act.* * * * * * * * * * * *Good luck – occasionally extraordinary luck – has played its part at Berkshire. If Paul and I had not enjoyed a mutual friend – John Roach – TTI would not have found its home with us. But that ample serving of luck was only the beginning. TTI was soon to lead Berkshire to its most important acquisition.Every fall, Berkshire directors gather for a presentation by a few of our executives. We sometimes choose the site based upon the location of a recent acquisition, by that means allowing directors to meet the new subsidiary’s CEO and learn more about the acquiree’s activities.In the fall of 2009, we consequently selected Fort Worth so that we could visit TTI. At that time, BNSF, which also had Fort Worth as its hometown, was the third-largest holding among our marketable equities. Despite that large stake, I had never visited the railroad’s headquarters.Deb Bosanek, my assistant, scheduled our board’s opening dinner for October 22. Meanwhile, I arranged to arrive earlier that day to meet with Matt Rose, CEO of BNSF, whose accomplishments I had long admired. When I made the date, I had no idea that our get-together would coincide with BNSF’s third-quarter earnings report, which was released late on the 22nd.The market reacted badly to the railroad’s results. The Great Recession was in full force in the third quarter, and BNSF’s earnings reflected that slump. The economic outlook was also bleak, and Wall Street wasn’t feeling friendly to railroads – or much else.On the following day, I again got together with Matt and suggested that Berkshire would offer the railroad a better long-term home than it could expect as a public company. I also told him the maximum price that Berkshire would pay.Matt relayed the offer to his directors and advisors. Eleven busy days later, Berkshire and BNSF announced a firm deal. And here I’ll venture a rare prediction: BNSF will be a key asset for Berkshire and our country a century from now.The BNSF acquisition would never have happened if Paul Andrews hadn’t sized up Berkshire as the right home for TTI.ThanksI taught my first investing class 70 years ago. Since then, I have enjoyed working almost every year with students of all ages, finally “retiring” from that pursuit in 2018.Along the way, my toughest audience was my grandson’s fifth-grade class. The 11-year-olds were squirming in their seats and giving me blank stares until I mentioned Coca-Cola and its famous secret formula. Instantly, every hand went up, and I learned that “secrets” are catnip to kids.Teaching, like writing, has helped me develop and clarify my own thoughts. Charlie calls this phenomenon the orangutan effect: If you sit down with an orangutan and carefully explain to it one of your cherished ideas, you may leave behind a puzzled primate, but will yourself exit thinking more clearly.Talking to university students is far superior. I have urged that they seek employment in (1) the field and (2) with the kind of people they would select, if they had no need for money. Economic realities, I acknowledge, may interfere with that kind of search. Even so, I urge the students never to give up the quest, for when they find that sort of job, they will no longer be “working.”Charlie and I, ourselves, followed that liberating course after a few early stumbles. We both started as part- timers at my grandfather’s grocery store, Charlie in 1940 and I in 1942. We were each assigned boring tasks and paid little, definitely not what we had in mind. Charlie later took up law, and I tried selling securities. Job satisfaction continued to elude us.Finally, at Berkshire, we found what we love to do. With very few exceptions, we have now “worked” for many decades with people whom we like and trust. It’s a joy in life to join with managers such as Paul Andrews or the Berkshire families I told you about last year. In our home office, we employ decent and talented people – no jerks. Turnover averages, perhaps, one person per year.I would like, however, to emphasize a further item that turns our jobs into fun and satisfaction workingfor you. There is nothing more rewarding to Charlie and me than enjoying the trust of individual long-term shareholders who, for many decades, have joined us with the expectation that we would be a reliable custodian of their funds.Obviously, we can’t select our owners, as we could do if our form of operation were a partnership. Anyone can buy shares of Berkshire today with the intention of soon reselling them. For sure, we get a few of that type of shareholder, just as we get index funds that own huge amounts of Berkshire simply because they are required to do so.To a truly unusual degree, however, Berkshire has as owners a very large corps of individuals and families that have elected to join us with an intent approaching “til death do us part.” Often, they have trusted us with a large – some might say excessive – portion of their savings.Berkshire, these shareholders would sometimes acknowledge, might be far from the best selection they could have made. But they would add that Berkshire would rank high among those with which they would be most comfortable. And people who are comfortable with their investments will, on average, achieve better results than those who are motivated by ever-changing headlines, chatter and promises.Long-term individual owners are both the “partners” Charlie and I have always sought and the ones we constantly have in mind as we make decisions at Berkshire. To them we say, “It feels good to ‘work’ for you, and you have our thanks for your trust.”The Annual MeetingClear your calendar! Berkshire will have its annual gathering of capitalists in Omaha on Friday, April 29th through Sunday, May 1st. The details regarding the weekend are laid out on pages A-1 and A-2. Omaha eagerly awaits you, as do I.I will end this letter with a sales pitch. “Cousin” Jimmy Buffett has designed a pontoon “party” boat that is now being manufactured by Forest River, a Berkshire subsidiary. The boat will be introduced on April 29 at our Berkshire Bazaar of Bargains. And, for two days only, shareholders will be able to purchase Jimmy’s masterpiece at a 10% discount. Your bargain-hunting chairman will be buying a boat for his family’s use. Join me.February 26, 2022Warren E. Buffett Chairman of the Board","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":77,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9914969324,"gmtCreate":1665158149968,"gmtModify":1676537566308,"author":{"id":"3554886109685293","authorId":"3554886109685293","name":"Expert126","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2d4304f2ec7fabd9d599a3ba8b2a17e0","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3554886109685293","authorIdStr":"3554886109685293"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Okok","listText":"Okok","text":"Okok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":4,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9914969324","repostId":"2273816362","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":359,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9916089248,"gmtCreate":1664488609585,"gmtModify":1676537462420,"author":{"id":"3554886109685293","authorId":"3554886109685293","name":"Expert126","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2d4304f2ec7fabd9d599a3ba8b2a17e0","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3554886109685293","authorIdStr":"3554886109685293"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Maf","listText":"Maf","text":"Maf","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9916089248","repostId":"1178201589","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1178201589","pubTimestamp":1664466587,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1178201589?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-09-29 23:49","market":"us","language":"en","title":"The Unstoppable Dollar Is Wreaking Havoc Everywhere","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1178201589","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"The Federal Reserve’s focus on taming inflation is inflicting a world of pain on other economies.The","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>The Federal Reserve’s focus on taming inflation is inflicting a world of pain on other economies.</p><p>The mighty dollar is steamrolling everything right now, causing issues for economies almost everywhere—except in the US. That means that, for now at least, it’s not America’s problem and the historic central-bank-fueled surge in the greenback is unlikely to abate anytime soon.</p><p>By some measures the US currency is already stronger than ever, eclipsing the highs of the Covid-19 pandemic from early 2020. The pain it’s inflicting has echoes of the mid-1980s, when foreign exchange chaos forced the world’s most important finance officials to join hands and impose a solution on markets. Right now, though, it’s every country for itself as the US administration pushes back on the idea of coordinated market action.</p><p>With the risk of economic damage spreading, officials from Tokyo to Santiago have been drawn into the fray to prop up their currencies with improvised solutions such as selling dollars directly into the market. But Federal Reserve chief Jerome Powell is squarely focused on fighting inflation at home, doubling down on rate-hiking plans that have supercharged the dollar. And US Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen has said she believes financial markets are working as they should.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/15c0cfff248bbeeb7618944d14772ccc\" tg-width=\"741\" tg-height=\"512\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>A combination of alluring interest rates in the US and the comfort of feeling your money is safer in dollar-denominated assets is helping buoy the greenback. In more normal times, officials might welcome a weakening of their currencies, which tends to stimulate growth by making exports more competitive while encouraging consumers and businesses to buy local. But these aren’t normal times. Right now the problem bedeviling officials from Frankfurt to Seoul is high inflation—and weak currencies add fuel to that by increasing the cost of imported products and stimulating domestic growth. So some governments and central banks need to respond to the ongoing battering.</p><p>Britain’s pound is just the latest major currency in the spotlight after new government fiscal plans sparked a dramatic loss of confidence in sterling. But it was, like its peers, under tremendous pressure before that, trading near multidecade lows. Elsewhere, the yen has weakened so much that Japan’s government has stepped directly into markets on several occasions since Sept. 22; India, Chile, and others have also felt compelled to intervene. Europe’s common currency, meanwhile, has sunk below parity with the dollar under the weight of the region’s energy crisis.</p><p>The currency situation is also forcing central banks around the world to consider ratcheting up their own interest rates further, which risks driving their economies into recession.</p><p>“The Fed is aware of the externalities of what they do—because we are the global reserve currency—but they have a domestic mandate and are focused on that,” says Paul McCulley, a former chief economist at Pacific Investment Management Co. who now teaches at Georgetown University. It’s unclear when such externalities might “move from noise to signal for the Fed, effectively coming back and impacting what they are doing,” he says. For now, McCulley sees the world left dancing to the Fed’s hawkish tune and suffering the “pain” that Powell himself has warned will result.</p><p>From the Fed’s perspective, a strong dollar actually helps the fight against inflation. By crimping the competitiveness of US business on the international stage, it acts to curb growth, in turn removing some inflationary pressure. This gives officials reason not to pull punches as they press the most aggressive monetary tightening since Paul Volcker wrestled with runaway inflation in the 1980s. The dollar’s strength was also a problem then until the so-called Plaza Accord reined it in. One key difference: The 1985 agreement between the UK, France, West Germany, Japan, and the US came only after Volcker had already broken the back of inflation, whereas the outcome of the present battle is very much undecided.</p><p>“Right now, the only mandate that matters to the Fed is controlling inflation,” says Stephen Roach, a Yale University senior fellow and former chairman of Morgan Stanley Asia. Mostly as a result of that single-mindedness, the global economy is heading toward recession, according to Roach. “That will certainly alter the inflationary pressures—and could lead to some stabilization on the other side of that for currency markets—but that’s putting the cart before the horse in this case now,” he says.</p><p>Case in point: Atlanta Fed President Raphael Bostic acknowledged concern that the UK’s turmoil could spill over into the US economy because it presents risks to global growth. Still, he refused to dial back his support for further Fed rate hikes.</p><p>So long as what’s going on around the globe doesn’t reverberate back into the US economy, the Fed can focus on its immediate task. A key question for Powell and Yellen is whether there will come a point at which international problems can’t be ignored.</p><p>The Treasury secretary said Sept. 27 that she thinks “markets are functioning well,” while White House economic adviser Brian Deese was even more explicit in saying that he doesn’t expect another 1985-type agreement among major economies to counter the dollar’s strength. The Fed, too, is staying the course, raising its benchmark rate at its most recent policy decision on Sept. 21 by a further 75 basis points and lifting its forecasts of how high borrowing costs will go. Those moves prompted an historic rout in bond markets that’s pushed the 10-year Treasury yield above 4%, to levels last seen back in 2008.</p><p>Despite the unease in markets, the mounting losses in bonds and stock portfolios and tumbling currencies elsewhere are largely in line with what Fed officials are trying to engineer: tighter financial conditions that will help put a lid on inflation. And so far, there are few signs of dramatic market breakdowns like those in previous financial crises. The world’s central banks haven’t had to tap emergency facilities at the Fed, and credit markets show that people remain more than willing to borrow and lend—albeit at a different price.</p><p>“The selloff in US bonds and credit within the context of an accelerated Fed rate cycle are not disruptive,” says Alan Ruskin, chief international strategist at Deutsche Bank AG. “That could change, but we are not there yet.”</p></body></html>","source":"lsy1584095487587","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>The Unstoppable Dollar Is Wreaking Havoc Everywhere</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nThe Unstoppable Dollar Is Wreaking Havoc Everywhere\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-09-29 23:49 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-09-29/us-dollar-usd-strength-brings-pain-to-british-pound-gbp><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The Federal Reserve’s focus on taming inflation is inflicting a world of pain on other economies.The mighty dollar is steamrolling everything right now, causing issues for economies almost everywhere—...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-09-29/us-dollar-usd-strength-brings-pain-to-british-pound-gbp\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"UUP":"美元ETF-PowerShares DB"},"source_url":"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-09-29/us-dollar-usd-strength-brings-pain-to-british-pound-gbp","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1178201589","content_text":"The Federal Reserve’s focus on taming inflation is inflicting a world of pain on other economies.The mighty dollar is steamrolling everything right now, causing issues for economies almost everywhere—except in the US. That means that, for now at least, it’s not America’s problem and the historic central-bank-fueled surge in the greenback is unlikely to abate anytime soon.By some measures the US currency is already stronger than ever, eclipsing the highs of the Covid-19 pandemic from early 2020. The pain it’s inflicting has echoes of the mid-1980s, when foreign exchange chaos forced the world’s most important finance officials to join hands and impose a solution on markets. Right now, though, it’s every country for itself as the US administration pushes back on the idea of coordinated market action.With the risk of economic damage spreading, officials from Tokyo to Santiago have been drawn into the fray to prop up their currencies with improvised solutions such as selling dollars directly into the market. But Federal Reserve chief Jerome Powell is squarely focused on fighting inflation at home, doubling down on rate-hiking plans that have supercharged the dollar. And US Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen has said she believes financial markets are working as they should.A combination of alluring interest rates in the US and the comfort of feeling your money is safer in dollar-denominated assets is helping buoy the greenback. In more normal times, officials might welcome a weakening of their currencies, which tends to stimulate growth by making exports more competitive while encouraging consumers and businesses to buy local. But these aren’t normal times. Right now the problem bedeviling officials from Frankfurt to Seoul is high inflation—and weak currencies add fuel to that by increasing the cost of imported products and stimulating domestic growth. So some governments and central banks need to respond to the ongoing battering.Britain’s pound is just the latest major currency in the spotlight after new government fiscal plans sparked a dramatic loss of confidence in sterling. But it was, like its peers, under tremendous pressure before that, trading near multidecade lows. Elsewhere, the yen has weakened so much that Japan’s government has stepped directly into markets on several occasions since Sept. 22; India, Chile, and others have also felt compelled to intervene. Europe’s common currency, meanwhile, has sunk below parity with the dollar under the weight of the region’s energy crisis.The currency situation is also forcing central banks around the world to consider ratcheting up their own interest rates further, which risks driving their economies into recession.“The Fed is aware of the externalities of what they do—because we are the global reserve currency—but they have a domestic mandate and are focused on that,” says Paul McCulley, a former chief economist at Pacific Investment Management Co. who now teaches at Georgetown University. It’s unclear when such externalities might “move from noise to signal for the Fed, effectively coming back and impacting what they are doing,” he says. For now, McCulley sees the world left dancing to the Fed’s hawkish tune and suffering the “pain” that Powell himself has warned will result.From the Fed’s perspective, a strong dollar actually helps the fight against inflation. By crimping the competitiveness of US business on the international stage, it acts to curb growth, in turn removing some inflationary pressure. This gives officials reason not to pull punches as they press the most aggressive monetary tightening since Paul Volcker wrestled with runaway inflation in the 1980s. The dollar’s strength was also a problem then until the so-called Plaza Accord reined it in. One key difference: The 1985 agreement between the UK, France, West Germany, Japan, and the US came only after Volcker had already broken the back of inflation, whereas the outcome of the present battle is very much undecided.“Right now, the only mandate that matters to the Fed is controlling inflation,” says Stephen Roach, a Yale University senior fellow and former chairman of Morgan Stanley Asia. Mostly as a result of that single-mindedness, the global economy is heading toward recession, according to Roach. “That will certainly alter the inflationary pressures—and could lead to some stabilization on the other side of that for currency markets—but that’s putting the cart before the horse in this case now,” he says.Case in point: Atlanta Fed President Raphael Bostic acknowledged concern that the UK’s turmoil could spill over into the US economy because it presents risks to global growth. Still, he refused to dial back his support for further Fed rate hikes.So long as what’s going on around the globe doesn’t reverberate back into the US economy, the Fed can focus on its immediate task. A key question for Powell and Yellen is whether there will come a point at which international problems can’t be ignored.The Treasury secretary said Sept. 27 that she thinks “markets are functioning well,” while White House economic adviser Brian Deese was even more explicit in saying that he doesn’t expect another 1985-type agreement among major economies to counter the dollar’s strength. The Fed, too, is staying the course, raising its benchmark rate at its most recent policy decision on Sept. 21 by a further 75 basis points and lifting its forecasts of how high borrowing costs will go. Those moves prompted an historic rout in bond markets that’s pushed the 10-year Treasury yield above 4%, to levels last seen back in 2008.Despite the unease in markets, the mounting losses in bonds and stock portfolios and tumbling currencies elsewhere are largely in line with what Fed officials are trying to engineer: tighter financial conditions that will help put a lid on inflation. And so far, there are few signs of dramatic market breakdowns like those in previous financial crises. The world’s central banks haven’t had to tap emergency facilities at the Fed, and credit markets show that people remain more than willing to borrow and lend—albeit at a different price.“The selloff in US bonds and credit within the context of an accelerated Fed rate cycle are not disruptive,” says Alan Ruskin, chief international strategist at Deutsche Bank AG. “That could change, but we are not there yet.”","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":70,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9992553973,"gmtCreate":1661345399094,"gmtModify":1676536500234,"author":{"id":"3554886109685293","authorId":"3554886109685293","name":"Expert126","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2d4304f2ec7fabd9d599a3ba8b2a17e0","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3554886109685293","authorIdStr":"3554886109685293"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hmm","listText":"Hmm","text":"Hmm","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9992553973","repostId":"2261630456","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2261630456","pubTimestamp":1661331683,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2261630456?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-08-24 17:01","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why Tesla's Stock Split Could Be a Bigger Deal Than Amazon's","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2261630456","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Stock splits are more effective when investors are eager to buy stocks than when they aren't.","content":"<html><head></head><body><h2>KEY POINTS</h2><ul><li>Tesla appears likely to benefit more from positive market timing than Amazon did with its stock split.</li><li>The forthcoming $7,500 tax credit for purchasing Tesla electric vehicles should also buoy investors&#39; confidence.</li><li>While Tesla&#39;s stock split could provide a bigger catalyst than Amazon&#39;s did, Amazon&#39;s long-term prospects still appear to be better.</li></ul><p><b>Amazon</b> is bigger than <b>Tesla</b> in nearly every way. Market cap, revenue, profits, number of employees -- you name it, and Amazon outsizes Tesla.</p><p>But there&#39;s at least one way that Tesla just might come out on top versus the e-commerce and cloud hosting giant. Both companies decided to conduct stock splits this year. Here&#39;s why Tesla&#39;s stock split could be a bigger deal than Amazon&#39;s.</p><h2>Market timing</h2><p>Amazon&#39;s 20-for-1 stock split took effect on June 6. In retrospect, the timing of this split wasn&#39;t very good at all. The <b>Nasdaq Composite Index</b> was firmly in a bear market in June. The <b>S&amp;P 500</b> had recently flirted with bear market territory. Amazon&#39;s shares at the time were down 22%.</p><p>Anyone hoping that the stock split would light a fire beneath Amazon stock was sorely disappointed. In the days after the split, Amazon&#39;s share price fell instead of moving higher.</p><p>It&#39;s a much different scenario for Tesla on the cusp of its 3-for-1 stock split on Aug. 24. Some observers believe that the Nasdaq bear market is over even with a pullback in the past few days. The S&amp;P 500 is clearly above the bear market threshold. Some are even cautiously optimistic that a new bull market could either be starting or will soon do so.</p><p>Tesla stock is already picking up momentum. Over the past three months, the company&#39;s shares have jumped more than 30%.</p><p>Neither Amazon nor Tesla could have known exactly how the stock market would perform when they announced their respective stock splits. However, it&#39;s abundantly clear that Tesla&#39;s timing is better than Amazon&#39;s.</p><p>Investors are more likely to buy stocks when the overall market is climbing. There&#39;s a real possibility, therefore, that Tesla&#39;s stock split will provide a bigger catalyst than Amazon&#39;s stock split did.</p><h2>Wall Street optimism</h2><p>Analysts also appear to be more optimistic about Tesla&#39;s prospects. <b>Canaccord Genuity</b>&#39;s George Gianarikas recently raised his 12-month price target on the stock to $881 from $815. There are also fewer sell ratings from analysts for Tesla in August than there have been in previous months.</p><p>This improved Wall Street sentiment could cause investors to be more excited about Tesla&#39;s stock split. Amazon didn&#39;t benefit from similar enthusiasm back in June.</p><h2>A boost from Uncle Sam</h2><p>Tesla&#39;s stock split is also coming on the heels of the passage of the Inflation Reduction Act. This legislation attempts to address a wide range of issues. The most important one for Tesla is climate change.</p><p>One of the provisions in the bill renews a $7,500 tax credit for Americans to purchase electric vehicles (EVs). Tesla&#39;s vehicles hadn&#39;t been eligible for this tax credit because the company has sold more than 200,000 EVs.</p><p>But this tax credit cap will no longer be in place effective Jan. 1, 2023. Tesla&#39;s vehicles will again be eligible for the $7,500 credit. This could potentially boost the company&#39;s sales next year.</p><p>Many investors are no doubt anticipating this catalyst. This knowledge could draw more buyers following Tesla&#39;s stock split on Wednesday than there would have been without the passage of the Inflation Reduction Act.</p><h2>What really matters</h2><p>Of course, neither Amazon&#39;s nor Tesla&#39;s stock splits matter very much over the long term. Stock splits can sometimes attract smaller investors, but they don&#39;t change companies&#39; underlying business prospects.</p><p>My view is that Amazon should still top Tesla over the long run. While both companies face increased competition, Amazon appears to have a stronger moat than Tesla does. Amazon also has more avenues for delivering growth with its e-commerce and cloud businesses plus opportunities in healthcare, self-driving cars, and more.</p><p>Sure, Tesla&#39;s stock split could be a bigger deal than Amazon&#39;s. But I think that Amazon as a whole will continue to be a bigger deal than Tesla throughout this decade and beyond.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why Tesla's Stock Split Could Be a Bigger Deal Than Amazon's</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy Tesla's Stock Split Could Be a Bigger Deal Than Amazon's\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-08-24 17:01 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/08/23/why-teslas-stock-split-bigger-deal-than-amazons/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>KEY POINTSTesla appears likely to benefit more from positive market timing than Amazon did with its stock split.The forthcoming $7,500 tax credit for purchasing Tesla electric vehicles should also ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/08/23/why-teslas-stock-split-bigger-deal-than-amazons/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AMZN":"亚马逊","TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/08/23/why-teslas-stock-split-bigger-deal-than-amazons/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2261630456","content_text":"KEY POINTSTesla appears likely to benefit more from positive market timing than Amazon did with its stock split.The forthcoming $7,500 tax credit for purchasing Tesla electric vehicles should also buoy investors' confidence.While Tesla's stock split could provide a bigger catalyst than Amazon's did, Amazon's long-term prospects still appear to be better.Amazon is bigger than Tesla in nearly every way. Market cap, revenue, profits, number of employees -- you name it, and Amazon outsizes Tesla.But there's at least one way that Tesla just might come out on top versus the e-commerce and cloud hosting giant. Both companies decided to conduct stock splits this year. Here's why Tesla's stock split could be a bigger deal than Amazon's.Market timingAmazon's 20-for-1 stock split took effect on June 6. In retrospect, the timing of this split wasn't very good at all. The Nasdaq Composite Index was firmly in a bear market in June. The S&P 500 had recently flirted with bear market territory. Amazon's shares at the time were down 22%.Anyone hoping that the stock split would light a fire beneath Amazon stock was sorely disappointed. In the days after the split, Amazon's share price fell instead of moving higher.It's a much different scenario for Tesla on the cusp of its 3-for-1 stock split on Aug. 24. Some observers believe that the Nasdaq bear market is over even with a pullback in the past few days. The S&P 500 is clearly above the bear market threshold. Some are even cautiously optimistic that a new bull market could either be starting or will soon do so.Tesla stock is already picking up momentum. Over the past three months, the company's shares have jumped more than 30%.Neither Amazon nor Tesla could have known exactly how the stock market would perform when they announced their respective stock splits. However, it's abundantly clear that Tesla's timing is better than Amazon's.Investors are more likely to buy stocks when the overall market is climbing. There's a real possibility, therefore, that Tesla's stock split will provide a bigger catalyst than Amazon's stock split did.Wall Street optimismAnalysts also appear to be more optimistic about Tesla's prospects. Canaccord Genuity's George Gianarikas recently raised his 12-month price target on the stock to $881 from $815. There are also fewer sell ratings from analysts for Tesla in August than there have been in previous months.This improved Wall Street sentiment could cause investors to be more excited about Tesla's stock split. Amazon didn't benefit from similar enthusiasm back in June.A boost from Uncle SamTesla's stock split is also coming on the heels of the passage of the Inflation Reduction Act. This legislation attempts to address a wide range of issues. The most important one for Tesla is climate change.One of the provisions in the bill renews a $7,500 tax credit for Americans to purchase electric vehicles (EVs). Tesla's vehicles hadn't been eligible for this tax credit because the company has sold more than 200,000 EVs.But this tax credit cap will no longer be in place effective Jan. 1, 2023. Tesla's vehicles will again be eligible for the $7,500 credit. This could potentially boost the company's sales next year.Many investors are no doubt anticipating this catalyst. This knowledge could draw more buyers following Tesla's stock split on Wednesday than there would have been without the passage of the Inflation Reduction Act.What really mattersOf course, neither Amazon's nor Tesla's stock splits matter very much over the long term. Stock splits can sometimes attract smaller investors, but they don't change companies' underlying business prospects.My view is that Amazon should still top Tesla over the long run. While both companies face increased competition, Amazon appears to have a stronger moat than Tesla does. Amazon also has more avenues for delivering growth with its e-commerce and cloud businesses plus opportunities in healthcare, self-driving cars, and more.Sure, Tesla's stock split could be a bigger deal than Amazon's. But I think that Amazon as a whole will continue to be a bigger deal than Tesla throughout this decade and beyond.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":85,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}