Eden8018 personal page - To The Moon

Eden8018

Eden8018

No personal profile

18Follow

1Followers

0Topic

0Badge

2022-04-17

$Roblox Corporation(RBLX)$Did people doesnt like them anymore?

2022-04-15

$Alibaba(BABA)$Still need long way back tohome

2022-04-13

We are at same tower .... but I was at 11 flr[Facepalm]

@H0KIT:$Skillz Inc(SKLZ)$when is it coming back?

2022-04-09

I think nobody going taking it was high valuenow.... course it really give investor a huge positive future.

Is Apple Stock A Buy, Sell, Or Hold?

2022-04-05

Too many uncertainty but great to hold if got stronger holding power

Hot Chinese ADRs Slipped in Morning Trading

2022-04-05

Although border open but profit could be effect by russia Ukraine war?[Speechless]

2022-04-03

All blue chip company being investigate

Microsoft's Cloud Business Targeted by EU Antitrust Regulators

2022-04-02

Did feel great to drop more lower 😜😜😜

Why Is Qualcomm Stock Down Today?

2022-04-01

Can be a good opportunity but need stronger holding power

Hot Chinese ADRs Soared in Morning Trading

2022-03-31

$Coinbase Global, Inc.(COIN)$Could it break another new high record?

2022-03-28

Shanghai semi lockdown ....apple droped somote [Cool]

Apple Shares Dropped More Than 1% in Premarket Trading

2022-03-20

When price dropped below 20 does any grab it

Can XPeng Stock Go Back Up To $50 Levels?

2022-03-18

😅

Some Chinese ADRs Slipped in Premarket Trading

2022-03-18

Shuold hv a lot investors become millionair on 16 Mac

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2022-03-13

New opportunity ?

EV Stocks Slipped in Morning Trading

2022-03-07

Big player always enroll behind slowly, the time we notice it was the time they sold the share.

姜还是老的辣！油价暴涨，巴菲特大手笔买入石油公司

2022-03-04

Ppl we always forget we living in the same planet 🥺

Ukraine Nuclear Power Plant Zaporizhzhia on Fire, Town Mayor Says

2022-03-03

Another challenging of the year

Tesla's Berlin Plant Receives Final Approval

2022-03-02

Fund institue grab the chance but small investor sold it

Fear, Panic And War Are Bad Reasons To Sell Stocks

2022-01-03

Another drop because of China regulation

China to Cut EV Subsidies By 30% In 2022: What That Means For Tesla, Nio, XPeng And Others

Go to Tiger App to see more news

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"userPageInfo":{"id":"3570855090477480","uuid":"3570855090477480","gmtCreate":1607829248282,"gmtModify":1704447493350,"name":"Eden8018","pinyin":"eden8018","introduction":"","introductionEn":"","signature":"","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2a67ec57bfd274c18d983a2e0da58ded","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":1,"headSize":18,"tweetSize":25,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":2,"name":"无畏虎","nameTw":"無畏虎","represent":"初生牛犊","factor":"发布3条非转发主帖,1条获得他人回复或点赞","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":"success","userBadges":[{"badgeId":"44212b71d0be4ec88898348dbe882e03-1","templateUuid":"44212b71d0be4ec88898348dbe882e03","name":"Boss Tiger","description":"The transaction amount of the securities account reaches $100,000","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c8dfc27c1ee0e25db1c93e9d0b641101","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f43908c142f8a33c78f5bdf0e2897488","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/82165ff19cb8a786e8919f92acee5213","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":1,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2024.05.10","exceedPercentage":"60.25%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1101},{"badgeId":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493-2","templateUuid":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493","name":"Senior Tiger","description":"Join the tiger community for 1000 days","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0063fb68ea29c9ae6858c58630e182d5","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/96c699a93be4214d4b49aea6a5a5d1a4","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/35b0e542a9ff77046ed69ef602bc105d","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.09.10","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be-2","templateUuid":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be","name":"Master Trader","description":"Total number of securities or futures transactions reached 100","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ad22cfbe2d05aa393b18e9226e4b0307","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/36702e6ff3ffe46acafee66cc85273ca","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d52eb88fa385cf5abe2616ed63781765","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.07.12","exceedPercentage":"80.63%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100},{"badgeId":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789-1","templateUuid":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789","name":"Knowledgeable Investor","description":"Traded more than 10 stocks","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e74cc24115c4fbae6154ec1b1041bf47","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d48265cbfd97c57f9048db29f22227b0","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76c6d6898b073c77e1c537ebe9ac1c57","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1102},{"badgeId":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84-1","templateUuid":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84","name":"Real Trader","description":"Completed a transaction","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":5,"currentWearingBadge":{"badgeId":"44212b71d0be4ec88898348dbe882e03-1","templateUuid":"44212b71d0be4ec88898348dbe882e03","name":"Boss Tiger","description":"The transaction amount of the securities account reaches $100,000","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c8dfc27c1ee0e25db1c93e9d0b641101","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f43908c142f8a33c78f5bdf0e2897488","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/82165ff19cb8a786e8919f92acee5213","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":1,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2024.05.10","exceedPercentage":"60.01%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1101},"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"location":null,"starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"post","tweets":[{"id":9081927676,"gmtCreate":1650184258469,"gmtModify":1676534665397,"author":{"id":"3570855090477480","authorId":"3570855090477480","name":"Eden8018","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2a67ec57bfd274c18d983a2e0da58ded","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570855090477480","authorIdStr":"3570855090477480"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/RBLX\">$Roblox Corporation(RBLX)$</a>Did people doesnt like them anymore?","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/RBLX\">$Roblox Corporation(RBLX)$</a>Did people doesnt like them anymore?","text":"$Roblox Corporation(RBLX)$Did people doesnt like them anymore?","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/2b339dd599589deeb8c459531efc998f","width":"1125","height":"3588"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9081927676","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":596,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9089760923,"gmtCreate":1650034790376,"gmtModify":1676534633432,"author":{"id":"3570855090477480","authorId":"3570855090477480","name":"Eden8018","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2a67ec57bfd274c18d983a2e0da58ded","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570855090477480","authorIdStr":"3570855090477480"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/BABA\">$Alibaba(BABA)$</a>Still need long way back tohome","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/BABA\">$Alibaba(BABA)$</a>Still need long way back tohome","text":"$Alibaba(BABA)$Still need long way back tohome","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/ec2a9da9780b0c903ce52fb476cc35df","width":"1125","height":"3816"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9089760923","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":802,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9080013976,"gmtCreate":1649817561468,"gmtModify":1676534583282,"author":{"id":"3570855090477480","authorId":"3570855090477480","name":"Eden8018","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2a67ec57bfd274c18d983a2e0da58ded","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570855090477480","authorIdStr":"3570855090477480"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"We are at same tower .... but I was at 11 flr[Facepalm]&nbsp;","listText":"We are at same tower .... but I was at 11 flr[Facepalm]&nbsp;","text":"We are at same tower .... but I was at 11 flr[Facepalm]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9080013976","repostId":"9017223685","repostType":1,"repost":{"id":9017223685,"gmtCreate":1649779261847,"gmtModify":1676534573950,"author":{"id":"3582028189369150","authorId":"3582028189369150","name":"H0KIT","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3582028189369150","authorIdStr":"3582028189369150"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/SKLZ\">$Skillz Inc(SKLZ)$</a>when is it coming back?","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/SKLZ\">$Skillz Inc(SKLZ)$</a>when is it coming back?","text":"$Skillz Inc(SKLZ)$when is it coming back?","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/273d47beba4a533e7ec827ed3e244970","width":"1080","height":"1920"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9017223685","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":0,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":352,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9015638544,"gmtCreate":1649470356881,"gmtModify":1676534517701,"author":{"id":"3570855090477480","authorId":"3570855090477480","name":"Eden8018","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2a67ec57bfd274c18d983a2e0da58ded","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570855090477480","authorIdStr":"3570855090477480"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"I think nobody going taking it was high valuenow.... course it really give investor a huge positive future.","listText":"I think nobody going taking it was high valuenow.... course it really give investor a huge positive future.","text":"I think nobody going taking it was high valuenow.... course it really give investor a huge positive future.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9015638544","repostId":"2225529120","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2225529120","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1649430186,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2225529120?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-04-08 23:03","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Is Apple Stock A Buy, Sell, Or Hold?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2225529120","media":"seekingalpha","summary":"Apple Inc.  is an ultra-high quality blue-chip company with an excellent brand and growth opportunit","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">Apple Inc. </a> is an ultra-high quality blue-chip company with an excellent brand and growth opportunities in health, automotive vehicle tech, and virtual reality. On the other hand, investors should note that the company&#39;s already very large size will likely prevent Apple from growing at an overly high pace in the coming years. Buybacks will also be less impactful due to an above-average valuation, and total returns could therefore be significantly lower compared to what investors got used to over the last couple of years.</p><h2>AAPL Stock Key Metrics</h2><p>Apple has excellent fundamentals. This includes strong margins, which are the result of a brand that warrants premium prices for Apple&#39;s products. Strong margins naturally mean that the company earns large amounts of money for each product it sells, but margins are also of importance due to a couple of other factors. High margins mean that inflationary pressures do not hurt Apple too much, for example. If margins were to compress by 100 base points due to higher input costs, the hit to Apple&#39;s bottom line would be a pretty small 4%. A competitor with a weaker net profit margin of 10% would see profits take a 10% hit in the same margin compression scenario. In a way, Apple&#39;s strong margins thus reduce risks for shareholders, as the company is able to stomach inflation, recessions, etc. easier compared to peers that are less profitable.</p><p>Apple also has a strong balance sheet and generates excellent cash flows. Per the company&#39;s most recent 10-Q filing, Apple Inc. had $203 billion of cash and equivalents on its balance sheet at the end of the first quarter. This was partially offset by $123 billion of debt, for a net cash position of $80 billion. At the same time, Apple&#39;s free cash flow came in at a gigantic $102 billion over the last four quarters, with capital expenditures of $10 billion already being accounted for. Capital expenditures of $10 billion aren&#39;t high for a company the size of Apple, but that can be attributed to its asset-light business model. Without costly manufacturing equipment, production plants, etc., the company is able to turn most of its operating cash flows into free cash. This naturally benefits shareholders as Apple can finance immense shareholder returns via dividends and buybacks.</p><h2>Apple&#39;s Growth Potential In Different Markets</h2><p>Apple&#39;s biggest business today is its iPhone franchise. That is not a high-growth market, however. Many people around the world have smartphones already, and those that do not own a smartphone generally do not buy a (high-priced) iPhone as their first product, instead opting for lower-priced entry phones. That being said, the iPhone business should still generate some growth through price increases over the years, but that will not be a major growth driver. Apple&#39;s very fast iPhone profits allow the company to invest in other areas, however. On top of that, the iPhone user base is important when it comes to growing revenues in the services segment.</p><p>As iPhone users acquire additional apps and consume more services and media through their phones over time, Apple&#39;s services (Apple Music, iCloud, Apple Pay, and the take from sales in its App Store) will experience growth over time. During the most recent quarter, Apple&#39;s Services revenue hit a new all-time high, with revenue of $19.5 billion, which was up 23% year over year. I expect that the addition of new services over time and the growing usage of existing services will allow Apple to grow its Services revenue meaningfully over the coming years.</p><p>Apple also seeks to expand in other areas. This includes Apple&#39;s Health ventures, as well as the Apple Car project. In both cases, Apple addresses a large market, which means that these projects could eventually move the needle very meaningfully for Apple. At least in the very near term, those will not be relevant growth drivers, however.</p><p>Some projections see the Apple Car project add $50 billion in revenue by 2030. That sounds like quite a lot, but on a relative basis, it&#39;s not that much, to be honest. Apple has generated revenue of $380 billion over the last year, thus the Apple Car business would add around 13% to that. If that were to happen during a single year, that would be outstanding, of course. But if it happens over roughly ten years, then the annualized growth boost is relatively slim, at just 1%-2%. When Apple&#39;s iPhone sales started to soar, the company generated year-over-year revenue growth rates of 50% and more during some quarters. The Apple Car project, even if successful, will not replicate that. The law of large numbers dictates that growing at a high relative growth rate becomes harder the larger a company gets. And with sales in the $380 billion a year area, Apple is very large already, which means that even successful product introductions will almost certainly not allow Apple to deliver another 50%+ revenue gain in the future, ever.</p><p>Still, between growth from its existing businesses and the introduction of new products over time, Apple will continue to deliver reasonable business growth over the years. Analysts are currently predicting a revenue growth rate of 7% a year through the next decade. My personal estimate would be slightly lower, at around 5%, but Apple may very well hit the 7% level -- which would be a strong result for a company this large, even though some of Apple&#39;s owners might be hoping for (way) stronger growth.</p><h2>Will The Metaverse Impact Apple?</h2><p>Apple also has ambitions when it comes to the Metaverse. Those haven&#39;t been broadcasted as widely as those from <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FB\">Meta Platforms</a> (FB), Microsoft (MSFT), etc. But still, Apple seeks to become a major player in this future industry. Apple&#39;s CEO Tim Cook first started publicly speaking about Augmented Reality in 2017, and that&#39;s also when Apple&#39;s ARKit was introduced. There are rumors that Apple might introduce its first AR/VR headset Apple Glass as early as this year, although there are no guarantees for that, of course. Still, it seems pretty clear that Apple&#39;s expansion into this space will continue over the coming years. Apple&#39;s revenue potential is uncertain, however. Whether AR/VR tech will become big enough to move the needle in a big way seems questionable for the next couple of years at least. But even if the Metaverse impact remains relatively small for the foreseeable future, the growth in the businesses laid out above should allow Apple to grow meaningfully going forward.</p><h2>Where Will Apple Stock Be In 10 Years?</h2><p>Business growth opportunities do not necessarily translate into strong equity returns. Cisco (CSCO) grew its business considerably between 2000 and 2010, as revenue rose by close to 100%. And still, Cisco&#39;s shares went down by more than 60% in that time frame, as valuation compression was even more impactful than the business growth the company experienced in that time frame. In Apple&#39;s case, total returns will be stronger, but multiple compression could still be a headwind going forward:</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/05d814ce0bd4641eabe68a69249df8f1\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"467\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/>Data by YCharts</p><p>Apple trades at a ~30% premium compared to the 5-year median when we look at its earnings multiple, while the premium compared to the 5-year median is ~50% when we look at Apple&#39;s enterprise value to EBITDA ratio. Clearly, Apple is significantly more expensive than it used to be in the past. When we look at the median valuations over the last ten years, the current premium is even more pronounced.</p><p>If Apple manages to grow its revenue by 7% a year over the next decade, in line with what analysts are expecting, we could see earnings per share growth in the 10% range, once we account for buybacks. Those have slowed down to just 2% over the last year, but let&#39;s still assume that Apple will be able to buy back around 3% of its share count in the future. With 10% annual earnings per share growth, Apple would be a pretty fast-growing enterprise, considering its already very large size. In that scenario, earnings per share could climb from $6.15 in 2022 to around $15.90 in 2032. If Apple were to trade at 22x net profits a decade from now, the share price would be $350. In this scenario, where Apple is trading in line with the 5-year median valuation, Apple would deliver annual share price gains of 7%.</p><p>When we consider that the last five years have been pretty good for equities and that this will not necessarily be the case going forward, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> can also make a case for a lower valuation, however. Rising interest rates could definitely result in lower valuations in future years, compared to how Apple and other equities were valued in the recent past. If Apple were to trade at 20x net profits a decade from now, the share price would be $320 in 2032, which would translate into 6% annual share price gains. If the earnings multiple drops to 18, the 2032 share price target is $286, which would result in annual share price gains of 5%. Some investors might believe that a valuation this low is highly unlikely, as AAPL is trading well above that level today. But once we consider that the 10-year median earnings multiple is <i>even lower</i>, at 16, a high-teens earnings multiple does not seem that unlikely after all.</p><p>All in all, we can summarize that Apple&#39;s growth outlook over the coming years is solid thanks to cash cow businesses like the iPhone that allow for growth investments in other areas. Share buybacks should also allow AAPL to grow its earnings per share more quickly compared to the business growth rate. That being said, the share price might not rise that much over the coming decade. Depending on circumstances such as market sentiment, interest rates, etc. a share price in the $280 to $350 range seems realistic, I believe. That would translate into annual share price gains of 5%-7%.</p><h2>Is AAPL Stock A Buy, Sell, Or Hold?</h2><p>Apple is an excellent company, and it has been a great investment in the past. But the fact that Apple has delivered outstanding returns over the last five or ten years does not mean that this will repeat. Shares were cheap a decade ago, and they are trading at a huge premium compared to the historic valuation today. To me, it seems realistic that Apple will deliver mid-to-high single-digits annual returns going forward. That&#39;s far from bad, but I do not believe that this makes Apple a Buy today.</p></body></html>","source":"seekingalpha","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Is Apple Stock A Buy, Sell, Or Hold?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nIs Apple Stock A Buy, Sell, Or Hold?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-04-08 23:03 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4500335-apple-stock-10-years><strong>seekingalpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Apple Inc.  is an ultra-high quality blue-chip company with an excellent brand and growth opportunities in health, automotive vehicle tech, and virtual reality. On the other hand, investors should ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4500335-apple-stock-10-years\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BK4559":"巴菲特持仓","BK4527":"明星科技股","BK4501":"段永平概念","BK4579":"人工智能","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓","BK4574":"无人驾驶","BK4573":"虚拟现实","AAPL":"苹果","BK4505":"高瓴资本持仓","BK4581":"高盛持仓","BK4512":"苹果概念","BK4170":"电脑硬件、储存设备及电脑周边","BK4515":"5G概念","BK4554":"元宇宙及AR概念","BK4532":"文艺复兴科技持仓","BK4553":"喜马拉雅资本持仓","BK4571":"数字音乐概念","BK4507":"流媒体概念","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","BK4576":"AR","BK4533":"AQR资本管理(全球第二大对冲基金)","BK4566":"资本集团","BK4575":"芯片概念"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4500335-apple-stock-10-years","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5a36db9d73b4222bc376d24ccc48c8a4","article_id":"2225529120","content_text":"Apple Inc.  is an ultra-high quality blue-chip company with an excellent brand and growth opportunities in health, automotive vehicle tech, and virtual reality. On the other hand, investors should note that the company's already very large size will likely prevent Apple from growing at an overly high pace in the coming years. Buybacks will also be less impactful due to an above-average valuation, and total returns could therefore be significantly lower compared to what investors got used to over the last couple of years.AAPL Stock Key MetricsApple has excellent fundamentals. This includes strong margins, which are the result of a brand that warrants premium prices for Apple's products. Strong margins naturally mean that the company earns large amounts of money for each product it sells, but margins are also of importance due to a couple of other factors. High margins mean that inflationary pressures do not hurt Apple too much, for example. If margins were to compress by 100 base points due to higher input costs, the hit to Apple's bottom line would be a pretty small 4%. A competitor with a weaker net profit margin of 10% would see profits take a 10% hit in the same margin compression scenario. In a way, Apple's strong margins thus reduce risks for shareholders, as the company is able to stomach inflation, recessions, etc. easier compared to peers that are less profitable.Apple also has a strong balance sheet and generates excellent cash flows. Per the company's most recent 10-Q filing, Apple Inc. had $203 billion of cash and equivalents on its balance sheet at the end of the first quarter. This was partially offset by $123 billion of debt, for a net cash position of $80 billion. At the same time, Apple's free cash flow came in at a gigantic $102 billion over the last four quarters, with capital expenditures of $10 billion already being accounted for. Capital expenditures of $10 billion aren't high for a company the size of Apple, but that can be attributed to its asset-light business model. Without costly manufacturing equipment, production plants, etc., the company is able to turn most of its operating cash flows into free cash. This naturally benefits shareholders as Apple can finance immense shareholder returns via dividends and buybacks.Apple's Growth Potential In Different MarketsApple's biggest business today is its iPhone franchise. That is not a high-growth market, however. Many people around the world have smartphones already, and those that do not own a smartphone generally do not buy a (high-priced) iPhone as their first product, instead opting for lower-priced entry phones. That being said, the iPhone business should still generate some growth through price increases over the years, but that will not be a major growth driver. Apple's very fast iPhone profits allow the company to invest in other areas, however. On top of that, the iPhone user base is important when it comes to growing revenues in the services segment.As iPhone users acquire additional apps and consume more services and media through their phones over time, Apple's services (Apple Music, iCloud, Apple Pay, and the take from sales in its App Store) will experience growth over time. During the most recent quarter, Apple's Services revenue hit a new all-time high, with revenue of $19.5 billion, which was up 23% year over year. I expect that the addition of new services over time and the growing usage of existing services will allow Apple to grow its Services revenue meaningfully over the coming years.Apple also seeks to expand in other areas. This includes Apple's Health ventures, as well as the Apple Car project. In both cases, Apple addresses a large market, which means that these projects could eventually move the needle very meaningfully for Apple. At least in the very near term, those will not be relevant growth drivers, however.Some projections see the Apple Car project add $50 billion in revenue by 2030. That sounds like quite a lot, but on a relative basis, it's not that much, to be honest. Apple has generated revenue of $380 billion over the last year, thus the Apple Car business would add around 13% to that. If that were to happen during a single year, that would be outstanding, of course. But if it happens over roughly ten years, then the annualized growth boost is relatively slim, at just 1%-2%. When Apple's iPhone sales started to soar, the company generated year-over-year revenue growth rates of 50% and more during some quarters. The Apple Car project, even if successful, will not replicate that. The law of large numbers dictates that growing at a high relative growth rate becomes harder the larger a company gets. And with sales in the $380 billion a year area, Apple is very large already, which means that even successful product introductions will almost certainly not allow Apple to deliver another 50%+ revenue gain in the future, ever.Still, between growth from its existing businesses and the introduction of new products over time, Apple will continue to deliver reasonable business growth over the years. Analysts are currently predicting a revenue growth rate of 7% a year through the next decade. My personal estimate would be slightly lower, at around 5%, but Apple may very well hit the 7% level -- which would be a strong result for a company this large, even though some of Apple's owners might be hoping for (way) stronger growth.Will The Metaverse Impact Apple?Apple also has ambitions when it comes to the Metaverse. Those haven't been broadcasted as widely as those from Meta Platforms (FB), Microsoft (MSFT), etc. But still, Apple seeks to become a major player in this future industry. Apple's CEO Tim Cook first started publicly speaking about Augmented Reality in 2017, and that's also when Apple's ARKit was introduced. There are rumors that Apple might introduce its first AR/VR headset Apple Glass as early as this year, although there are no guarantees for that, of course. Still, it seems pretty clear that Apple's expansion into this space will continue over the coming years. Apple's revenue potential is uncertain, however. Whether AR/VR tech will become big enough to move the needle in a big way seems questionable for the next couple of years at least. But even if the Metaverse impact remains relatively small for the foreseeable future, the growth in the businesses laid out above should allow Apple to grow meaningfully going forward.Where Will Apple Stock Be In 10 Years?Business growth opportunities do not necessarily translate into strong equity returns. Cisco (CSCO) grew its business considerably between 2000 and 2010, as revenue rose by close to 100%. And still, Cisco's shares went down by more than 60% in that time frame, as valuation compression was even more impactful than the business growth the company experienced in that time frame. In Apple's case, total returns will be stronger, but multiple compression could still be a headwind going forward:Data by YChartsApple trades at a ~30% premium compared to the 5-year median when we look at its earnings multiple, while the premium compared to the 5-year median is ~50% when we look at Apple's enterprise value to EBITDA ratio. Clearly, Apple is significantly more expensive than it used to be in the past. When we look at the median valuations over the last ten years, the current premium is even more pronounced.If Apple manages to grow its revenue by 7% a year over the next decade, in line with what analysts are expecting, we could see earnings per share growth in the 10% range, once we account for buybacks. Those have slowed down to just 2% over the last year, but let's still assume that Apple will be able to buy back around 3% of its share count in the future. With 10% annual earnings per share growth, Apple would be a pretty fast-growing enterprise, considering its already very large size. In that scenario, earnings per share could climb from $6.15 in 2022 to around $15.90 in 2032. If Apple were to trade at 22x net profits a decade from now, the share price would be $350. In this scenario, where Apple is trading in line with the 5-year median valuation, Apple would deliver annual share price gains of 7%.When we consider that the last five years have been pretty good for equities and that this will not necessarily be the case going forward, one can also make a case for a lower valuation, however. Rising interest rates could definitely result in lower valuations in future years, compared to how Apple and other equities were valued in the recent past. If Apple were to trade at 20x net profits a decade from now, the share price would be $320 in 2032, which would translate into 6% annual share price gains. If the earnings multiple drops to 18, the 2032 share price target is $286, which would result in annual share price gains of 5%. Some investors might believe that a valuation this low is highly unlikely, as AAPL is trading well above that level today. But once we consider that the 10-year median earnings multiple is even lower, at 16, a high-teens earnings multiple does not seem that unlikely after all.All in all, we can summarize that Apple's growth outlook over the coming years is solid thanks to cash cow businesses like the iPhone that allow for growth investments in other areas. Share buybacks should also allow AAPL to grow its earnings per share more quickly compared to the business growth rate. That being said, the share price might not rise that much over the coming decade. Depending on circumstances such as market sentiment, interest rates, etc. a share price in the $280 to $350 range seems realistic, I believe. That would translate into annual share price gains of 5%-7%.Is AAPL Stock A Buy, Sell, Or Hold?Apple is an excellent company, and it has been a great investment in the past. But the fact that Apple has delivered outstanding returns over the last five or ten years does not mean that this will repeat. Shares were cheap a decade ago, and they are trading at a huge premium compared to the historic valuation today. To me, it seems realistic that Apple will deliver mid-to-high single-digits annual returns going forward. That's far from bad, but I do not believe that this makes Apple a Buy today.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":793,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9016827804,"gmtCreate":1649169265499,"gmtModify":1676534462722,"author":{"id":"3570855090477480","authorId":"3570855090477480","name":"Eden8018","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2a67ec57bfd274c18d983a2e0da58ded","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570855090477480","authorIdStr":"3570855090477480"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Too many uncertainty but great to hold if got stronger holding power","listText":"Too many uncertainty but great to hold if got stronger holding power","text":"Too many uncertainty but great to hold if got stronger holding power","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9016827804","repostId":"1154558214","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1154558214","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1649165886,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1154558214?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-04-05 21:38","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Hot Chinese ADRs Slipped in Morning Trading","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1154558214","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Hot Chinese ADRs slipped in morning trading. Alibaba, Pinduoduo, JD.com, NetEase, Baidu, Bilibili, D","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Hot Chinese ADRs slipped in morning trading. Alibaba, Pinduoduo, JD.com, NetEase, Baidu, Bilibili, DiDi, Ke Holdings, Nio, Xpeng and Li Auto fell between 1% and 6%.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/39e9de68cf72824e5ab1b9e1035d4cf9\" tg-width=\"417\" tg-height=\"532\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8ddcbd033b8545edcd852c796da3a7f8\" tg-width=\"423\" tg-height=\"373\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a8282f2b9c02775e0d455cd90b49deb2\" tg-width=\"414\" tg-height=\"295\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Hot Chinese ADRs Slipped in Morning Trading</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHot Chinese ADRs Slipped in Morning Trading\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-04-05 21:38</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>Hot Chinese ADRs slipped in morning trading. Alibaba, Pinduoduo, JD.com, NetEase, Baidu, Bilibili, DiDi, Ke Holdings, Nio, Xpeng and Li Auto fell between 1% and 6%.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/39e9de68cf72824e5ab1b9e1035d4cf9\" tg-width=\"417\" tg-height=\"532\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8ddcbd033b8545edcd852c796da3a7f8\" tg-width=\"423\" tg-height=\"373\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a8282f2b9c02775e0d455cd90b49deb2\" tg-width=\"414\" tg-height=\"295\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"JD":"京东","BABA":"阿里巴巴"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1154558214","content_text":"Hot Chinese ADRs slipped in morning trading. Alibaba, Pinduoduo, JD.com, NetEase, Baidu, Bilibili, DiDi, Ke Holdings, Nio, Xpeng and Li Auto fell between 1% and 6%.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1031,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9016102775,"gmtCreate":1649138665421,"gmtModify":1676534458219,"author":{"id":"3570855090477480","authorId":"3570855090477480","name":"Eden8018","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2a67ec57bfd274c18d983a2e0da58ded","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570855090477480","authorIdStr":"3570855090477480"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Although border open but profit could be effect by russia Ukraine war?[Speechless]&nbsp;","listText":"Although border open but profit could be effect by russia Ukraine war?[Speechless]&nbsp;","text":"Although border open but profit could be effect by russia Ukraine war?[Speechless]","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/aee61549f83feaffdf91c9547895a6a0","width":"1125","height":"2985"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9016102775","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":588,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9018389114,"gmtCreate":1648973329842,"gmtModify":1676534430793,"author":{"id":"3570855090477480","authorId":"3570855090477480","name":"Eden8018","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2a67ec57bfd274c18d983a2e0da58ded","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570855090477480","authorIdStr":"3570855090477480"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"All blue chip company being investigate&nbsp;","listText":"All blue chip company being investigate&nbsp;","text":"All blue chip company being investigate","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9018389114","repostId":"2224340564","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2224340564","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1648863342,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2224340564?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-04-02 09:35","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Microsoft's Cloud Business Targeted by EU Antitrust Regulators","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2224340564","media":"Reuters","summary":"(Reuters) - EU antitrust regulators are quizzing Microsoft's rivals and customers about its cloud bu","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>(Reuters) - EU antitrust regulators are quizzing Microsoft&#39;s rivals and customers about its cloud business and licensing deals, a  questionnaire seen by Reuters showed, in a move that could lead to a formal investigation and renewed scrutiny of the U.S. software company.</p><p>The European Commission has fined Microsoft a total 1.6 billion euros ($1.8 billion) in the previous decade for breaching EU antitrust rules and for not complying with its order to halt anti-competitive practices.</p><p>The company found itself on the EU competition enforcer&#39;s radar again after German software provider NextCloud, France&#39;s OVHcloud    and two other companies filed complaints about Microsoft&#39;s cloud practices.</p><p>&#34;The Commission has information that Microsoft may be using its potentially dominant position in certain software markets to foreclose competition regarding certain cloud computing services,&#34; the questionnaire said.</p><p>Regulators asked if the terms in Microsoft&#39;s licensing deals with cloud service providers allow rivals to compete effectively.</p><p>They also want to know if companies needed Microsoft&#39;s operating systems and productivity applications to complement their own cloud infrastructure offering in order to compete effectively.</p><p>Companies also were asked about the differences in license fees and commercial terms between the licensing deals with cloud service providers and another programme in which they package and  indirectly resell Microsoft&#39;s cloud services together with their own.</p><p>Another focus was potential technical limitations on cloud storage services available on companies&#39; cloud infrastructure.</p><p>&#34;We&#39;re continuously evaluating how we can best support partners and make Microsoft software available to customers across all environments, including those of other cloud providers,&#34; Microsoft said in an emailed statement.</p><p>EU antitrust chief Margrethe Vestager earlier this week said she has no concerns yet about cloud computing and cited the competition from Europe&#39;s Gaia-X initiative.</p><p>($1 = 0.9060 euros)</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Microsoft's Cloud Business Targeted by EU Antitrust Regulators</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nMicrosoft's Cloud Business Targeted by EU Antitrust Regulators\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-04-02 09:35</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>(Reuters) - EU antitrust regulators are quizzing Microsoft&#39;s rivals and customers about its cloud business and licensing deals, a  questionnaire seen by Reuters showed, in a move that could lead to a formal investigation and renewed scrutiny of the U.S. software company.</p><p>The European Commission has fined Microsoft a total 1.6 billion euros ($1.8 billion) in the previous decade for breaching EU antitrust rules and for not complying with its order to halt anti-competitive practices.</p><p>The company found itself on the EU competition enforcer&#39;s radar again after German software provider NextCloud, France&#39;s OVHcloud    and two other companies filed complaints about Microsoft&#39;s cloud practices.</p><p>&#34;The Commission has information that Microsoft may be using its potentially dominant position in certain software markets to foreclose competition regarding certain cloud computing services,&#34; the questionnaire said.</p><p>Regulators asked if the terms in Microsoft&#39;s licensing deals with cloud service providers allow rivals to compete effectively.</p><p>They also want to know if companies needed Microsoft&#39;s operating systems and productivity applications to complement their own cloud infrastructure offering in order to compete effectively.</p><p>Companies also were asked about the differences in license fees and commercial terms between the licensing deals with cloud service providers and another programme in which they package and  indirectly resell Microsoft&#39;s cloud services together with their own.</p><p>Another focus was potential technical limitations on cloud storage services available on companies&#39; cloud infrastructure.</p><p>&#34;We&#39;re continuously evaluating how we can best support partners and make Microsoft software available to customers across all environments, including those of other cloud providers,&#34; Microsoft said in an emailed statement.</p><p>EU antitrust chief Margrethe Vestager earlier this week said she has no concerns yet about cloud computing and cited the competition from Europe&#39;s Gaia-X initiative.</p><p>($1 = 0.9060 euros)</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BK4548":"巴美列捷福持仓","BK4504":"桥水持仓","BK4516":"特朗普概念","BK4097":"系统软件","BK4503":"景林资产持仓","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓","BK4576":"AR","BK4538":"云计算","BK4527":"明星科技股","BK4535":"淡马锡持仓","BK4566":"资本集团","BK4525":"远程办公概念","BK4577":"网络游戏","MSFT":"微软","BK4579":"人工智能","BK4533":"AQR资本管理(全球第二大对冲基金)","BK4567":"ESG概念","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","BK4532":"文艺复兴科技持仓","BK4554":"元宇宙及AR概念","BK4528":"SaaS概念","BK4581":"高盛持仓"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2224340564","content_text":"(Reuters) - EU antitrust regulators are quizzing Microsoft's rivals and customers about its cloud business and licensing deals, a  questionnaire seen by Reuters showed, in a move that could lead to a formal investigation and renewed scrutiny of the U.S. software company.The European Commission has fined Microsoft a total 1.6 billion euros ($1.8 billion) in the previous decade for breaching EU antitrust rules and for not complying with its order to halt anti-competitive practices.The company found itself on the EU competition enforcer's radar again after German software provider NextCloud, France's OVHcloud    and two other companies filed complaints about Microsoft's cloud practices.\"The Commission has information that Microsoft may be using its potentially dominant position in certain software markets to foreclose competition regarding certain cloud computing services,\" the questionnaire said.Regulators asked if the terms in Microsoft's licensing deals with cloud service providers allow rivals to compete effectively.They also want to know if companies needed Microsoft's operating systems and productivity applications to complement their own cloud infrastructure offering in order to compete effectively.Companies also were asked about the differences in license fees and commercial terms between the licensing deals with cloud service providers and another programme in which they package and  indirectly resell Microsoft's cloud services together with their own.Another focus was potential technical limitations on cloud storage services available on companies' cloud infrastructure.\"We're continuously evaluating how we can best support partners and make Microsoft software available to customers across all environments, including those of other cloud providers,\" Microsoft said in an emailed statement.EU antitrust chief Margrethe Vestager earlier this week said she has no concerns yet about cloud computing and cited the competition from Europe's Gaia-X initiative.($1 = 0.9060 euros)","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":730,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9011238109,"gmtCreate":1648867339743,"gmtModify":1676534414644,"author":{"id":"3570855090477480","authorId":"3570855090477480","name":"Eden8018","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2a67ec57bfd274c18d983a2e0da58ded","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570855090477480","authorIdStr":"3570855090477480"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Did feel great to drop more lower 😜😜😜","listText":"Did feel great to drop more lower 😜😜😜","text":"Did feel great to drop more lower 😜😜😜","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9011238109","repostId":"1151157270","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1151157270","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1648866517,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1151157270?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-04-02 10:28","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why Is Qualcomm Stock Down Today?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1151157270","media":"InvestorPlace","summary":"Today, Apple and Qualcomm are both in the red, following an analyst update and a reversal of consume","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Today, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">Apple</a> and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/QCOM\">Qualcomm</a> are both in the red, following an analyst update and a reversal of consumer discretionary trends. For QCOM stock specifically, a drop of 3.81% on Friday highlights just how bearish today’s price action has been for some top technology companies.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b0893962a2138698601906046e9152cc\" tg-width=\"300\" tg-height=\"169\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: Xixi Fu / Shutterstock.com</p><p>Qualcomm and Apple have been joined at the hip for some time. That’s because Qualcomm is a major chip supplier for Apple’s phones. Accordingly, analysts tend to bucket the two together when looking at consumer spending trends within the smartphone space.</p><p>Lately, a number of headwinds have arisen, which seem to have shaken the faith of analysts and investors in the consumer discretionary sector. There are high-profile supply chain issues that continue to put pressure on this sector. Inflationary concerns continue to compress margins. And the evolving relationship between these two companies is another factor investors have to consider.</p><p>That said, there’s yet another headwind investors are pricing into both stocks today. Let’s dive into what investors are watching with Qualcomm.</p><p><b>Why Is QCOM Stock Plunging Today?</b></p><p>Today, JPMorgan’s Analyst Focus List, which has included the likes of Apple and Qualcomm for some time, has some big changes. Namely, the removal of these two tech juggernauts from the list has raised investor eyebrows.</p><p>JPMorgan analysts cited early warning signs of a reversal of consumer trending trends. Thus, expectations that end markets could see material weakness, recession or not, has led these analysts to “moderate [their] near-term bullishness for shares of Apple and Qualcomm.”</p><p>These adjusted expectations are certainly not a fringe view. Many investors view both Apple and Qualcomm as beneficiaries of the strong, consumer-driven economy we’ve seen over the past decade. The potential for the economy to turn over could materially affect both companies.</p><p>For long-term investors in Qualcomm, perhaps the removal from a key analyst watch list isn’t a big deal. After all, strong secular trends remain in place. However, a reversion of these trends, even over the medium term, is enough for many investors to look elsewhere today.</p></body></html>","source":"lsy1606302653667","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why Is Qualcomm Stock Down Today?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy Is Qualcomm Stock Down Today?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-04-02 10:28 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://investorplace.com/2022/04/why-is-qualcomm-qcom-stock-down-today/><strong>InvestorPlace</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Today, Apple and Qualcomm are both in the red, following an analyst update and a reversal of consumer discretionary trends. For QCOM stock specifically, a drop of 3.81% on Friday highlights just how ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://investorplace.com/2022/04/why-is-qualcomm-qcom-stock-down-today/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"QCOM":"高通"},"source_url":"https://investorplace.com/2022/04/why-is-qualcomm-qcom-stock-down-today/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1151157270","content_text":"Today, Apple and Qualcomm are both in the red, following an analyst update and a reversal of consumer discretionary trends. For QCOM stock specifically, a drop of 3.81% on Friday highlights just how bearish today’s price action has been for some top technology companies.Source: Xixi Fu / Shutterstock.comQualcomm and Apple have been joined at the hip for some time. That’s because Qualcomm is a major chip supplier for Apple’s phones. Accordingly, analysts tend to bucket the two together when looking at consumer spending trends within the smartphone space.Lately, a number of headwinds have arisen, which seem to have shaken the faith of analysts and investors in the consumer discretionary sector. There are high-profile supply chain issues that continue to put pressure on this sector. Inflationary concerns continue to compress margins. And the evolving relationship between these two companies is another factor investors have to consider.That said, there’s yet another headwind investors are pricing into both stocks today. Let’s dive into what investors are watching with Qualcomm.Why Is QCOM Stock Plunging Today?Today, JPMorgan’s Analyst Focus List, which has included the likes of Apple and Qualcomm for some time, has some big changes. Namely, the removal of these two tech juggernauts from the list has raised investor eyebrows.JPMorgan analysts cited early warning signs of a reversal of consumer trending trends. Thus, expectations that end markets could see material weakness, recession or not, has led these analysts to “moderate [their] near-term bullishness for shares of Apple and Qualcomm.”These adjusted expectations are certainly not a fringe view. Many investors view both Apple and Qualcomm as beneficiaries of the strong, consumer-driven economy we’ve seen over the past decade. The potential for the economy to turn over could materially affect both companies.For long-term investors in Qualcomm, perhaps the removal from a key analyst watch list isn’t a big deal. After all, strong secular trends remain in place. However, a reversion of these trends, even over the medium term, is enough for many investors to look elsewhere today.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":631,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9011372508,"gmtCreate":1648823526595,"gmtModify":1676534405471,"author":{"id":"3570855090477480","authorId":"3570855090477480","name":"Eden8018","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2a67ec57bfd274c18d983a2e0da58ded","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570855090477480","authorIdStr":"3570855090477480"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Can be a good opportunity but need stronger holding power&nbsp;","listText":"Can be a good opportunity but need stronger holding power&nbsp;","text":"Can be a good opportunity but need stronger holding power","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9011372508","repostId":"1153497658","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1153497658","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1648820371,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1153497658?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-04-01 21:39","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Hot Chinese ADRs Soared in Morning Trading","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1153497658","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Hot chinese ADRs soared in morning trading. Alibaba, Pinduoduo, JD.com, NetEase, Baidu, Bilibili, iQ","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Hot chinese ADRs soared in morning trading. Alibaba, Pinduoduo, JD.com, NetEase, Baidu, Bilibili, iQIYI, DiDi, Nio, Xpeng and Li Auto climbed between 5% and 25%.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/39f2467210e6392b898cd3ec6cfa006f\" tg-width=\"410\" tg-height=\"722\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p></p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Hot Chinese ADRs Soared in Morning Trading</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHot Chinese ADRs Soared in Morning Trading\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-04-01 21:39</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>Hot chinese ADRs soared in morning trading. Alibaba, Pinduoduo, JD.com, NetEase, Baidu, Bilibili, iQIYI, DiDi, Nio, Xpeng and Li Auto climbed between 5% and 25%.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/39f2467210e6392b898cd3ec6cfa006f\" tg-width=\"410\" tg-height=\"722\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p></p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BABA":"阿里巴巴"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1153497658","content_text":"Hot chinese ADRs soared in morning trading. Alibaba, Pinduoduo, JD.com, NetEase, Baidu, Bilibili, iQIYI, DiDi, Nio, Xpeng and Li Auto climbed between 5% and 25%.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":690,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9013894207,"gmtCreate":1648698478357,"gmtModify":1676534382335,"author":{"id":"3570855090477480","authorId":"3570855090477480","name":"Eden8018","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2a67ec57bfd274c18d983a2e0da58ded","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570855090477480","authorIdStr":"3570855090477480"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/COIN\">$Coinbase Global, Inc.(COIN)$</a>Could it break another&nbsp;new high record?","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/COIN\">$Coinbase Global, Inc.(COIN)$</a>Could it break another&nbsp;new high record?","text":"$Coinbase Global, Inc.(COIN)$Could it break another new high record?","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/7b627db305921a745efb297f84901463","width":"1125","height":"3588"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9013894207","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":604,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9010473985,"gmtCreate":1648461816796,"gmtModify":1676534340585,"author":{"id":"3570855090477480","authorId":"3570855090477480","name":"Eden8018","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2a67ec57bfd274c18d983a2e0da58ded","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570855090477480","authorIdStr":"3570855090477480"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Shanghai semi lockdown ....apple droped somote&nbsp;[Cool]&nbsp;","listText":"Shanghai semi lockdown ....apple droped somote&nbsp;[Cool]&nbsp;","text":"Shanghai semi lockdown ....apple droped somote [Cool]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9010473985","repostId":"1173221643","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1173221643","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1648454422,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1173221643?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-03-28 16:00","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Shares Dropped More Than 1% in Premarket Trading","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1173221643","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Apple shares dropped more than 1% in premarket trading after it is reported to cut iPhone, AirPods o","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Apple shares dropped more than 1% in premarket trading after it is reported to cut iPhone, AirPods output amid Ukraine war uncertainty.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8c046e2ecfe03a4b27a3b8705588d2e2\" tg-width=\"843\" tg-height=\"620\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>Apple plans to make about 20% fewer iPhone SEs next quarter than originally planned, in one of the first signs that the Ukraine war and looming inflation have started to dent consumer electronics demand, sources briefed on the matter told Nikkei Asia.</p><p>Apple launched the iPhone SE as its first 5G-capable budget phone less than three weeks ago but is now telling multiple suppliers that it aims to lower production orders by about 2 million to 3 million units for the quarter, citing weaker-than-expected demand, four people told Nikkei Asia. The U.S. tech giant also reduced orders for its AirPods earphones by more than 10 million units for all of 2022, as the company predicted lukewarm demand and wanted to reduce the level of inventories.</p><p>The company shipped about 76.8 million units of AirPods in 2021, Counterpoint Research data showed, but people with knowledge of the situation said overall shipments for 2022 could likely see a decline.</p><p>Apple also asked suppliers to make a couple of million fewer units of the entire iPhone 13 range than previously planned, but said this adjustment was based on seasonal demand.</p><p>These moves by the world&#39;s most powerful chip and component procurer underline the mounting pressure on the tech industry following the onset of the Russia-Ukraine war, which has compounded the yearslong chip shortage that has hit a string of industries from smartphones to PCs to automobiles.</p><p>Numerous governments, from the U.S. and the EU to Japan, South Korea and Taiwan, have imposed economic sanctions against Russia over its invasion of Ukraine, and the supply chain has been rocked by turmoil in the oil, energy and raw materials markets. The looming inflation risks further adding to people&#39;s living costs and creates concerns over demand for consumer electronics products.</p><p>Apple halted its production sales in Russia soon after the unexpected outbreak of the Ukraine war. The Cupertino, California-based tech giant is the No. 3 smartphone maker in Russia, where sales of around 5 million iPhones gave it a 16% market share last year, data from IDC showed. It is the No. 5 PC maker in the Russian market.</p><p>It is not surprising that the company has turned conservative for the June quarter, an executive at an Apple supplier told Nikkei Asia. &#34;The war has affected spending at the European markets. ... It is understandable [consumers will] save the money for food and for heating.&#34;</p><p>The move by Apple, the leader in the consumer electronics industry, to lower its production volume for the newly introduced iPhone could spark chain effects on other consumer electronics makers to trim production orders and digest their inventories amid the uncertain market.</p><p>Multiple global institutions have lowered their forecasts of worldwide economic growth for this year. The International Monetary Fund is to trim its global economic growth forecast for 2022 in April due to the Ukraine turmoil and declining risks in a number of countries. The IMF last estimated 4.4% global economic growth this year. China, the world&#39;s second-largest economy, also set a growth target of 5.5% this year, the mildest over the past 30 years.</p><p>Brady Wang, a tech analyst with Counterpoint Research, said the overall smartphone market has seen unreasonably high levels of inventory and will eventually undergo a correction.</p><p>&#34;We see the end demand for smartphones in China is quite weak. ... In addition, the Russia-Ukraine war will likely have spillover effects to the whole European market and on consumer demand,&#34; Wang told Nikkei Asia. Counterpoint has revised down its view for the smartphone market for 2022 to some 5% of growth, saying the ongoing Ukraine war could bring uncertainties.</p><p>Apple declined to comment for this story.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Shares Dropped More Than 1% in Premarket Trading</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Shares Dropped More Than 1% in Premarket Trading\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-03-28 16:00</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>Apple shares dropped more than 1% in premarket trading after it is reported to cut iPhone, AirPods output amid Ukraine war uncertainty.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8c046e2ecfe03a4b27a3b8705588d2e2\" tg-width=\"843\" tg-height=\"620\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>Apple plans to make about 20% fewer iPhone SEs next quarter than originally planned, in one of the first signs that the Ukraine war and looming inflation have started to dent consumer electronics demand, sources briefed on the matter told Nikkei Asia.</p><p>Apple launched the iPhone SE as its first 5G-capable budget phone less than three weeks ago but is now telling multiple suppliers that it aims to lower production orders by about 2 million to 3 million units for the quarter, citing weaker-than-expected demand, four people told Nikkei Asia. The U.S. tech giant also reduced orders for its AirPods earphones by more than 10 million units for all of 2022, as the company predicted lukewarm demand and wanted to reduce the level of inventories.</p><p>The company shipped about 76.8 million units of AirPods in 2021, Counterpoint Research data showed, but people with knowledge of the situation said overall shipments for 2022 could likely see a decline.</p><p>Apple also asked suppliers to make a couple of million fewer units of the entire iPhone 13 range than previously planned, but said this adjustment was based on seasonal demand.</p><p>These moves by the world&#39;s most powerful chip and component procurer underline the mounting pressure on the tech industry following the onset of the Russia-Ukraine war, which has compounded the yearslong chip shortage that has hit a string of industries from smartphones to PCs to automobiles.</p><p>Numerous governments, from the U.S. and the EU to Japan, South Korea and Taiwan, have imposed economic sanctions against Russia over its invasion of Ukraine, and the supply chain has been rocked by turmoil in the oil, energy and raw materials markets. The looming inflation risks further adding to people&#39;s living costs and creates concerns over demand for consumer electronics products.</p><p>Apple halted its production sales in Russia soon after the unexpected outbreak of the Ukraine war. The Cupertino, California-based tech giant is the No. 3 smartphone maker in Russia, where sales of around 5 million iPhones gave it a 16% market share last year, data from IDC showed. It is the No. 5 PC maker in the Russian market.</p><p>It is not surprising that the company has turned conservative for the June quarter, an executive at an Apple supplier told Nikkei Asia. &#34;The war has affected spending at the European markets. ... It is understandable [consumers will] save the money for food and for heating.&#34;</p><p>The move by Apple, the leader in the consumer electronics industry, to lower its production volume for the newly introduced iPhone could spark chain effects on other consumer electronics makers to trim production orders and digest their inventories amid the uncertain market.</p><p>Multiple global institutions have lowered their forecasts of worldwide economic growth for this year. The International Monetary Fund is to trim its global economic growth forecast for 2022 in April due to the Ukraine turmoil and declining risks in a number of countries. The IMF last estimated 4.4% global economic growth this year. China, the world&#39;s second-largest economy, also set a growth target of 5.5% this year, the mildest over the past 30 years.</p><p>Brady Wang, a tech analyst with Counterpoint Research, said the overall smartphone market has seen unreasonably high levels of inventory and will eventually undergo a correction.</p><p>&#34;We see the end demand for smartphones in China is quite weak. ... In addition, the Russia-Ukraine war will likely have spillover effects to the whole European market and on consumer demand,&#34; Wang told Nikkei Asia. Counterpoint has revised down its view for the smartphone market for 2022 to some 5% of growth, saying the ongoing Ukraine war could bring uncertainties.</p><p>Apple declined to comment for this story.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1173221643","content_text":"Apple shares dropped more than 1% in premarket trading after it is reported to cut iPhone, AirPods output amid Ukraine war uncertainty.Apple plans to make about 20% fewer iPhone SEs next quarter than originally planned, in one of the first signs that the Ukraine war and looming inflation have started to dent consumer electronics demand, sources briefed on the matter told Nikkei Asia.Apple launched the iPhone SE as its first 5G-capable budget phone less than three weeks ago but is now telling multiple suppliers that it aims to lower production orders by about 2 million to 3 million units for the quarter, citing weaker-than-expected demand, four people told Nikkei Asia. The U.S. tech giant also reduced orders for its AirPods earphones by more than 10 million units for all of 2022, as the company predicted lukewarm demand and wanted to reduce the level of inventories.The company shipped about 76.8 million units of AirPods in 2021, Counterpoint Research data showed, but people with knowledge of the situation said overall shipments for 2022 could likely see a decline.Apple also asked suppliers to make a couple of million fewer units of the entire iPhone 13 range than previously planned, but said this adjustment was based on seasonal demand.These moves by the world's most powerful chip and component procurer underline the mounting pressure on the tech industry following the onset of the Russia-Ukraine war, which has compounded the yearslong chip shortage that has hit a string of industries from smartphones to PCs to automobiles.Numerous governments, from the U.S. and the EU to Japan, South Korea and Taiwan, have imposed economic sanctions against Russia over its invasion of Ukraine, and the supply chain has been rocked by turmoil in the oil, energy and raw materials markets. The looming inflation risks further adding to people's living costs and creates concerns over demand for consumer electronics products.Apple halted its production sales in Russia soon after the unexpected outbreak of the Ukraine war. The Cupertino, California-based tech giant is the No. 3 smartphone maker in Russia, where sales of around 5 million iPhones gave it a 16% market share last year, data from IDC showed. It is the No. 5 PC maker in the Russian market.It is not surprising that the company has turned conservative for the June quarter, an executive at an Apple supplier told Nikkei Asia. \"The war has affected spending at the European markets. ... It is understandable [consumers will] save the money for food and for heating.\"The move by Apple, the leader in the consumer electronics industry, to lower its production volume for the newly introduced iPhone could spark chain effects on other consumer electronics makers to trim production orders and digest their inventories amid the uncertain market.Multiple global institutions have lowered their forecasts of worldwide economic growth for this year. The International Monetary Fund is to trim its global economic growth forecast for 2022 in April due to the Ukraine turmoil and declining risks in a number of countries. The IMF last estimated 4.4% global economic growth this year. China, the world's second-largest economy, also set a growth target of 5.5% this year, the mildest over the past 30 years.Brady Wang, a tech analyst with Counterpoint Research, said the overall smartphone market has seen unreasonably high levels of inventory and will eventually undergo a correction.\"We see the end demand for smartphones in China is quite weak. ... In addition, the Russia-Ukraine war will likely have spillover effects to the whole European market and on consumer demand,\" Wang told Nikkei Asia. Counterpoint has revised down its view for the smartphone market for 2022 to some 5% of growth, saying the ongoing Ukraine war could bring uncertainties.Apple declined to comment for this story.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":62,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9034969747,"gmtCreate":1647758453207,"gmtModify":1676534263851,"author":{"id":"3570855090477480","authorId":"3570855090477480","name":"Eden8018","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2a67ec57bfd274c18d983a2e0da58ded","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570855090477480","authorIdStr":"3570855090477480"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"When price dropped below 20 does any grab it","listText":"When price dropped below 20 does any grab it","text":"When price dropped below 20 does any grab it","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9034969747","repostId":"1121413470","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1121413470","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1647745257,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1121413470?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-03-20 11:00","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Can XPeng Stock Go Back Up To $50 Levels?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1121413470","media":"seekingalpha","summary":"SummaryXPeng's share price went above the $50 mark in late-November 2021 after it released better-th","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>Summary</b></p><ul><li>XPeng&#39;s share price went above the $50 mark in late-November 2021 after it released better-than-expected Q3 2021 results and Q4 2021 guidance.</li><li>But XPEV&#39;s shares have halved year-to-date in 2022, given the valuation de-rating for growth stocks, concerns regarding potential revenue misses for 2022, and delisting fears.</li><li>I rate XPeng as a Hold; I think the company&#39;s shares won&#39;t go back up to $50 levels in the short term.</li></ul><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fdedf526e99080369e7496ef684c9999\" tg-width=\"1536\" tg-height=\"1024\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>Robert Way/iStock Editorial via Getty Images</span></p><p><b>Elevator Pitch</b></p><p>I have a Hold investment rating for XPeng Inc. (NYSE:XPEV) [9868:HK]. My Neutral view on the stock is based on the premise that the company&#39;s shares aren&#39;t likely to rebound significantly (let alone return to $50 levels) in the near term. The negative headwinds hurting XPEV&#39;s shares such as investor style shift, supply chain disruptions for the Chinese automotive industry and concerns over the potential delisting of US-listed companies are likely to persist for a while. With its valuations reflecting most of the negatives after the sell-down in recent months, a Hold rating for XPeng is appropriate.</p><p><b>XPEV Stock Key Metrics</b></p><p>XPEV describes itself as &#34;a leading Chinese smart electric vehicle company that designs, develops, manufactures, and markets Smart EVs&#34; which targets &#34;technology-savvy middle-class consumers&#34; in its press releases. XPeng will report its Q4 2021 financial results on March 28, 2022, so I will review the company&#39;s most recent Q3 2021 financial metrics to see how the company has performed.</p><p>XPeng issued its Q3 2021 financial results media release on November 23, 2021 before the market opened, and this was well received by the market with XPEV&#39;s shares rising by +8% from $47.39 of November 22, 2021 to cross the $50 mark and close at $51.30 as of November 23, 2021. In the next week, XPeng&#39;s stock price gained further to reach a 52-week high of $56.45 on December 1, 2021, during intra-day trading.</p><p>The company&#39;s revenue expanded by +187% YoYin Q3 2021, and this was +9% better than what the market had anticipated. XPEV&#39;s vehicle deliveries almost tripled YoY from 8,578 units in Q3 2020 to 25,666 units in Q3 2021, and this exceeded the higher end of the company&#39;s earlier vehicle deliveries guidance of 23,000-25,000 units. Looking forward, XPeng expects to achieve vehicle deliveries of 35,500 units (mid-point of guidance) in the fourth quarter of 2021, which would be equivalent to a +174% YoY increase. XPEV also guided that its revenue should jump by +156% YoY to RMB7.3 billion (mid-point of guidance) in Q4 2021, which was +26% higher than the sell-side&#39;s consensus fourth-quarter top line estimate at the time of the Q3 earnings release.</p><p>But the good times did not last, as I highlight in the subsequent section.</p><p><b>Why Has XPeng Stock Dropped?</b></p><p>XPeng&#39;s stock price has fallen roughly by half since the start of the year. XPEV&#39;s shares fell from $50.27 as of January 3, 2022 (first trading day of the year) to $24.97 as of March 17, 2022.</p><p>In my opinion, there are three factors that have led to the severe decline in XPEV&#39;s share price.</p><p>Firstly, XPeng has suffered from a substantial valuation de-rating.</p><p>Investors have been rotating away from high (revenue) growth, loss-making stocks to profitable companies which are returning capital to shareholders via dividends or buybacks. This shift in investor preferences is aligned with expectations of rising interest rates in the future, which tend to be negative for high-growth companies.</p><p>Specifically, XPEV&#39;s consensus forward next twelve months&#39; Enterprise Value-to-Revenue multiple has compressed from above 8 times in late-November 2021 to 2.8 times as of March 17, 2022.</p><p>Secondly, there are concerns that the revenue growth and margins of Chinese electric vehicle companies like XPEV could disappoint the market in 2022.</p><p>Market consensus already expects XPeng&#39;s top line expansion to slow from +252% in fiscal 2021 to +97% in FY 2022. Besides a higher base for comparison in 2021, it is possible that supply chain disruptions could be a drag on Chinese electric vehicle sales in 2022. A recent March 11, 2021 <i>South China Morning Post</i> article highlighted that China Passenger Car Association&#39;s 5.5 million NEV (New Energy Vehicle) sales forecasts could be too bullish, as a researcher from North China University of Technology quoted in the article &#34;predicted that output of batteries and car chips may only be enough for 4.4 million NEVs this year.&#34;</p><p>Even if XPeng and its Chinese electric vehicle peers are able to secure sufficient semiconductor chips and batteries to meet market demand, it is likely to come at the expense of higher costs and wider losses. In other words, XPEV&#39;s 2022 year-to-date share price correction could be attributed to concerns of below-expectations financial results for the company this year.</p><p>Thirdly, worries about the potential risk of Chinese stocks delisting from the US might have hurt investor sentiment for XPEV as well.</p><p>XPeng&#39;s share price corrected from $28.65 as of March 9, 2022, to $19.75 as of March 14, 2022. This was linked to news of the SEC listing &#34;five China-based companies that could be delisted if they don&#39;t allow U.S. authorities to review company audits for three straight years&#34; as reported by <i>Seeking Alpha News</i> on March 11, 2022. XPEV&#39;s shares later rebounded strongly to close at $27.53 as of March 16, 2022, after <i>Xinhua News Agency</i> highlighted that &#34;the Chinese government continues to support various types of companies to list overseas.&#34; This seems to suggest that China will engage with the US on the topic of Chinese listings in the US and related audit issues.</p><p>XPEV is in a relatively better position than most other US-listed Chinese companies as its shares are already dual-listed in both the US and Hong Kong. But assuming that XPeng is eventually compelled to delist from the US market in a few years&#39; time, it is still a negative for the company&#39;s shares. The Hong Kong equity market or other stock markets for that matter are inferior to the US market in terms of liquidity and valuations. If XPEV ends up being solely listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange, the company loses an important channel for further financing, and its valuations might further de-rate to be in line with the broader Hong Kong market.</p><p>In the next section, I assess XPeng&#39;s stock price outlook.</p><p><b>Can XPEV Stock Rebound To $50?</b></p><p>It is challenging for XPeng&#39;s share price to recover back to $50. Based on my calculations, XPEV&#39;s consensus forward next twelve months&#39; Enterprise Value-to-Revenue multiple will have to expand to 6.6 times for its shares to be valued at $50.</p><p>I am of the view that a significant rebound for XPEV&#39;s shares in the near term driven by valuation multiple expansion is unlikely. As I explained in the prior section, a shift in investors&#39; preferences away from growth stocks, headwinds for the Chinese automotive industry at large, and delisting fears are going to cap XPeng&#39;s capital appreciation potential for now.</p><p>Furthermore, XPEV&#39;s current valuations are reasonable based on a peer comparison exercise.</p><p><b>Peer Valuation Comparison For XPEV</b></p><table><tbody><tr><td><b>Stock</b></td><td><b>Consensus Forward Next Twelve Months&#39; Enterprise Value-to-Revenue Multiple</b></td><td><b>Consensus Forward One Fiscal Year Gross Profit Margin</b></td><td><b>Consensus Forward Two Fiscal Year Gross Profit Margin</b></td><td><b>Consensus Forward One Fiscal Year Revenue Growth</b></td><td><b>Consensus Forward Two Fiscal Year Revenue Growth</b></td></tr><tr><td>XPeng</td><td><b>2.8</b></td><td><b>15.6%</b></td><td><b>17.9%</b></td><td><b>+97.2%</b></td><td><b>+58.3%</b></td></tr><tr><td>NIO Inc. (NIO)</td><td>3.5</td><td>19.7%</td><td>21.2%</td><td>+76.4%</td><td>+56.7%</td></tr><tr><td>Li Auto Inc. (LI)</td><td>2.4</td><td>21.6%</td><td>21.8%</td><td>+92.5%</td><td>+66.1%</td></tr></tbody></table><p>Source:<i>S&amp;P Capital IQ</i></p><p>XPeng&#39;s forward Enterprise Value-to-Revenue multiple is higher than LI, but lower than NIO. Although XPEV boasts slightly faster FY 2022 revenue growth rates as compared to its peers, its forecasted gross margin are the lowest in the peer group. As such, it is hard to argue that XPeng&#39;s shares are undervalued based on a peer valuation comparison.</p><p><b>Is XPEV Stock A Buy, Sell, Or Hold?</b></p><p>XPEV is a Hold. XPeng&#39;s valuations have already de-rated significantly, which prices the negatives to a considerable extent. On the other hand, the current headwinds that are a drag on its share price aren&#39;t likely to ease anytime soon.</p></body></html>","source":"lsy1642056764450","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Can XPeng Stock Go Back Up To $50 Levels?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nCan XPeng Stock Go Back Up To $50 Levels?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-03-20 11:00 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4496469-can-xpeng-stock-go-to-50-levels><strong>seekingalpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>SummaryXPeng's share price went above the $50 mark in late-November 2021 after it released better-than-expected Q3 2021 results and Q4 2021 guidance.But XPEV's shares have halved year-to-date in 2022,...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4496469-can-xpeng-stock-go-to-50-levels\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"XPEV":"小鹏汽车"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4496469-can-xpeng-stock-go-to-50-levels","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1121413470","content_text":"SummaryXPeng's share price went above the $50 mark in late-November 2021 after it released better-than-expected Q3 2021 results and Q4 2021 guidance.But XPEV's shares have halved year-to-date in 2022, given the valuation de-rating for growth stocks, concerns regarding potential revenue misses for 2022, and delisting fears.I rate XPeng as a Hold; I think the company's shares won't go back up to $50 levels in the short term.Robert Way/iStock Editorial via Getty ImagesElevator PitchI have a Hold investment rating for XPeng Inc. (NYSE:XPEV) [9868:HK]. My Neutral view on the stock is based on the premise that the company's shares aren't likely to rebound significantly (let alone return to $50 levels) in the near term. The negative headwinds hurting XPEV's shares such as investor style shift, supply chain disruptions for the Chinese automotive industry and concerns over the potential delisting of US-listed companies are likely to persist for a while. With its valuations reflecting most of the negatives after the sell-down in recent months, a Hold rating for XPeng is appropriate.XPEV Stock Key MetricsXPEV describes itself as \"a leading Chinese smart electric vehicle company that designs, develops, manufactures, and markets Smart EVs\" which targets \"technology-savvy middle-class consumers\" in its press releases. XPeng will report its Q4 2021 financial results on March 28, 2022, so I will review the company's most recent Q3 2021 financial metrics to see how the company has performed.XPeng issued its Q3 2021 financial results media release on November 23, 2021 before the market opened, and this was well received by the market with XPEV's shares rising by +8% from $47.39 of November 22, 2021 to cross the $50 mark and close at $51.30 as of November 23, 2021. In the next week, XPeng's stock price gained further to reach a 52-week high of $56.45 on December 1, 2021, during intra-day trading.The company's revenue expanded by +187% YoYin Q3 2021, and this was +9% better than what the market had anticipated. XPEV's vehicle deliveries almost tripled YoY from 8,578 units in Q3 2020 to 25,666 units in Q3 2021, and this exceeded the higher end of the company's earlier vehicle deliveries guidance of 23,000-25,000 units. Looking forward, XPeng expects to achieve vehicle deliveries of 35,500 units (mid-point of guidance) in the fourth quarter of 2021, which would be equivalent to a +174% YoY increase. XPEV also guided that its revenue should jump by +156% YoY to RMB7.3 billion (mid-point of guidance) in Q4 2021, which was +26% higher than the sell-side's consensus fourth-quarter top line estimate at the time of the Q3 earnings release.But the good times did not last, as I highlight in the subsequent section.Why Has XPeng Stock Dropped?XPeng's stock price has fallen roughly by half since the start of the year. XPEV's shares fell from $50.27 as of January 3, 2022 (first trading day of the year) to $24.97 as of March 17, 2022.In my opinion, there are three factors that have led to the severe decline in XPEV's share price.Firstly, XPeng has suffered from a substantial valuation de-rating.Investors have been rotating away from high (revenue) growth, loss-making stocks to profitable companies which are returning capital to shareholders via dividends or buybacks. This shift in investor preferences is aligned with expectations of rising interest rates in the future, which tend to be negative for high-growth companies.Specifically, XPEV's consensus forward next twelve months' Enterprise Value-to-Revenue multiple has compressed from above 8 times in late-November 2021 to 2.8 times as of March 17, 2022.Secondly, there are concerns that the revenue growth and margins of Chinese electric vehicle companies like XPEV could disappoint the market in 2022.Market consensus already expects XPeng's top line expansion to slow from +252% in fiscal 2021 to +97% in FY 2022. Besides a higher base for comparison in 2021, it is possible that supply chain disruptions could be a drag on Chinese electric vehicle sales in 2022. A recent March 11, 2021 South China Morning Post article highlighted that China Passenger Car Association's 5.5 million NEV (New Energy Vehicle) sales forecasts could be too bullish, as a researcher from North China University of Technology quoted in the article \"predicted that output of batteries and car chips may only be enough for 4.4 million NEVs this year.\"Even if XPeng and its Chinese electric vehicle peers are able to secure sufficient semiconductor chips and batteries to meet market demand, it is likely to come at the expense of higher costs and wider losses. In other words, XPEV's 2022 year-to-date share price correction could be attributed to concerns of below-expectations financial results for the company this year.Thirdly, worries about the potential risk of Chinese stocks delisting from the US might have hurt investor sentiment for XPEV as well.XPeng's share price corrected from $28.65 as of March 9, 2022, to $19.75 as of March 14, 2022. This was linked to news of the SEC listing \"five China-based companies that could be delisted if they don't allow U.S. authorities to review company audits for three straight years\" as reported by Seeking Alpha News on March 11, 2022. XPEV's shares later rebounded strongly to close at $27.53 as of March 16, 2022, after Xinhua News Agency highlighted that \"the Chinese government continues to support various types of companies to list overseas.\" This seems to suggest that China will engage with the US on the topic of Chinese listings in the US and related audit issues.XPEV is in a relatively better position than most other US-listed Chinese companies as its shares are already dual-listed in both the US and Hong Kong. But assuming that XPeng is eventually compelled to delist from the US market in a few years' time, it is still a negative for the company's shares. The Hong Kong equity market or other stock markets for that matter are inferior to the US market in terms of liquidity and valuations. If XPEV ends up being solely listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange, the company loses an important channel for further financing, and its valuations might further de-rate to be in line with the broader Hong Kong market.In the next section, I assess XPeng's stock price outlook.Can XPEV Stock Rebound To $50?It is challenging for XPeng's share price to recover back to $50. Based on my calculations, XPEV's consensus forward next twelve months' Enterprise Value-to-Revenue multiple will have to expand to 6.6 times for its shares to be valued at $50.I am of the view that a significant rebound for XPEV's shares in the near term driven by valuation multiple expansion is unlikely. As I explained in the prior section, a shift in investors' preferences away from growth stocks, headwinds for the Chinese automotive industry at large, and delisting fears are going to cap XPeng's capital appreciation potential for now.Furthermore, XPEV's current valuations are reasonable based on a peer comparison exercise.Peer Valuation Comparison For XPEVStockConsensus Forward Next Twelve Months' Enterprise Value-to-Revenue MultipleConsensus Forward One Fiscal Year Gross Profit MarginConsensus Forward Two Fiscal Year Gross Profit MarginConsensus Forward One Fiscal Year Revenue GrowthConsensus Forward Two Fiscal Year Revenue GrowthXPeng2.815.6%17.9%+97.2%+58.3%NIO Inc. (NIO)3.519.7%21.2%+76.4%+56.7%Li Auto Inc. (LI)2.421.6%21.8%+92.5%+66.1%Source:S&P Capital IQXPeng's forward Enterprise Value-to-Revenue multiple is higher than LI, but lower than NIO. Although XPEV boasts slightly faster FY 2022 revenue growth rates as compared to its peers, its forecasted gross margin are the lowest in the peer group. As such, it is hard to argue that XPeng's shares are undervalued based on a peer valuation comparison.Is XPEV Stock A Buy, Sell, Or Hold?XPEV is a Hold. XPeng's valuations have already de-rated significantly, which prices the negatives to a considerable extent. On the other hand, the current headwinds that are a drag on its share price aren't likely to ease anytime soon.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":151,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9035660248,"gmtCreate":1647583314002,"gmtModify":1676534247694,"author":{"id":"3570855090477480","authorId":"3570855090477480","name":"Eden8018","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2a67ec57bfd274c18d983a2e0da58ded","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570855090477480","authorIdStr":"3570855090477480"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"😅","listText":"😅","text":"😅","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9035660248","repostId":"1110565349","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1110565349","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1647504187,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1110565349?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-03-17 16:03","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Some Chinese ADRs Slipped in Premarket Trading","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1110565349","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Alibaba, Nio, Li Auto, Baidu, Bilibili, Douyu and iQiyi fell between 1% and 7%.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Alibaba, Nio, Li Auto, Baidu, Bilibili, Douyu and iQiyi fell between 1% and 7%.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a7556c27b1ff227965d95ce725a71d06\" tg-width=\"583\" tg-height=\"710\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Some Chinese ADRs Slipped in Premarket Trading</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSome Chinese ADRs Slipped in Premarket Trading\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-03-17 16:03</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>Alibaba, Nio, Li Auto, Baidu, Bilibili, Douyu and iQiyi fell between 1% and 7%.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a7556c27b1ff227965d95ce725a71d06\" tg-width=\"583\" tg-height=\"710\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BABA":"阿里巴巴","NIO":"蔚来"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1110565349","content_text":"Alibaba, Nio, Li Auto, Baidu, Bilibili, Douyu and iQiyi fell between 1% and 7%.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":163,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9035660859,"gmtCreate":1647583289603,"gmtModify":1676534247696,"author":{"id":"3570855090477480","authorId":"3570855090477480","name":"Eden8018","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2a67ec57bfd274c18d983a2e0da58ded","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570855090477480","authorIdStr":"3570855090477480"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Shuold hv a lot investors become millionair on 16 Mac","listText":"Shuold hv a lot investors become millionair on 16 Mac","text":"Shuold hv a lot investors become millionair on 16 Mac","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9035660859","repostId":"1110565349","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":95,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9036573252,"gmtCreate":1647155068735,"gmtModify":1676534199571,"author":{"id":"3570855090477480","authorId":"3570855090477480","name":"Eden8018","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2a67ec57bfd274c18d983a2e0da58ded","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570855090477480","authorIdStr":"3570855090477480"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"New opportunity ?","listText":"New opportunity ?","text":"New opportunity ?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9036573252","repostId":"1115884948","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1115884948","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1647011216,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1115884948?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-03-11 23:06","market":"us","language":"en","title":"EV Stocks Slipped in Morning Trading","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1115884948","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"EV stocks slipped in morning trading. Tesla, Rivian, Nio, Li Auto, XPeng, Canoo, Nikola, Arrival and","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>EV stocks slipped in morning trading. Tesla, Rivian, Nio, Li Auto, XPeng, Canoo, Nikola, Arrival and Fisker fell between 1% and 9%.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/266f2c21868afc18e8e415176c7033f7\" tg-width=\"491\" tg-height=\"527\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/97fd8eeabe752ad89f2430de6fd07982\" tg-width=\"493\" tg-height=\"125\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>EV Stocks Slipped in Morning Trading</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nEV Stocks Slipped in Morning Trading\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-03-11 23:06</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>EV stocks slipped in morning trading. Tesla, Rivian, Nio, Li Auto, XPeng, Canoo, Nikola, Arrival and Fisker fell between 1% and 9%.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/266f2c21868afc18e8e415176c7033f7\" tg-width=\"491\" tg-height=\"527\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/97fd8eeabe752ad89f2430de6fd07982\" tg-width=\"493\" tg-height=\"125\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NIO":"蔚来","XPEV":"小鹏汽车","LCID":"Lucid Group Inc","TSLA":"特斯拉","LI":"理想汽车"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1115884948","content_text":"EV stocks slipped in morning trading. Tesla, Rivian, Nio, Li Auto, XPeng, Canoo, Nikola, Arrival and Fisker fell between 1% and 9%.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":487,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9031524057,"gmtCreate":1646618841306,"gmtModify":1676534144289,"author":{"id":"3570855090477480","authorId":"3570855090477480","name":"Eden8018","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2a67ec57bfd274c18d983a2e0da58ded","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570855090477480","authorIdStr":"3570855090477480"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Big player always enroll behind slowly, the time we notice it was the time they sold the share.","listText":"Big player always enroll behind slowly, the time we notice it was the time they sold the share.","text":"Big player always enroll behind slowly, the time we notice it was the time they sold the share.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9031524057","repostId":"2217949664","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2217949664","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1646610950,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2217949664?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-03-07 07:55","market":"us","language":"zh","title":"姜还是老的辣！油价暴涨，巴菲特大手笔买入石油公司","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2217949664","media":"华尔街见闻","summary":"被巴菲特“重拾”的石油股，本周大涨45%。","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>全球油价大涨，巴菲特又重拾了两年前清仓的石油股。</p><p>本周五，美国证券交易委员会的一份新文件显示，巴菲特旗下的<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BRK\">伯克希尔</a>哈撒韦公司增持了<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/OXY\">西方石油</a>公司股份，目前持有股份达到1.13亿股，价值53亿美元。</p><p>在伯克希尔哈撒韦持有的1.13亿股中，仅有2900多万股为普通股，剩余8300多万股以认股权证形式存在，执行价格为59.624美元。<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9bd160e1dca73e9d48ef2b7d89e9e95a\" tg-width=\"2712\" tg-height=\"1368\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/>本周五，西方石油公司上涨18%，本周上涨45%，收盘价为56.15美元。<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e1a52f55237b86052b29cf203b00024c\" tg-width=\"1301\" tg-height=\"1065\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><b>随着俄乌争端的爆发，全球油价一路走高，目前已飙升至115美元以上</b>，巴菲特也因此觉察这个机会，大举买入石油公司股票。</p><p>目前其投资组合中超过6100万股股票是在周三，周四和周五购买的，价格从47.07美元到56.45美元不等。<b>但根据伯克希尔哈撒韦最新的13F文件，截至2021年12月31日，该公司没有持有西方石油公司的股票。</b></p><p>目前尚不知晓剩余的股票是在何时买入，因为伯克希尔哈撒韦持有西方石油公司的所有权尚不满10%，监管不要求披露。</p><p>不过，尽管这些认股权证没有被行使，但出于向证交会提交申请的目的，这些认股权证必须被计算在内，<b>从技术上讲，伯克希尔哈撒韦持有的股份将超过17%。</b></p><p>伯克希尔哈撒韦获得的这些权证来自于2019年向西方石油公司提供的100亿美元贷款，帮助其以380亿美元收购阿纳达科公司。</p><p>这笔贷款以伯克希尔哈撒韦购买优先股的形式发放，要求西方石油公司每年支付8%的股息。也就是每个季度2亿美元。</p><p>当时巴菲特对CNBC表示，他是在押注油价将长期上涨。</p><p>不过后来，巴菲特押注的油价在2020年初因新冠疫情爆发而表现不佳。在那年的股东大会上，巴菲特说：</p><blockquote>“如果你是西方石油股东或任何一家石油生产公司的股东，在油价走向方面你和我都犯了一个错误。”</blockquote><p>为了节省现金，西方石油公司以股票的形式向伯克希尔哈撒韦支付了第一和第二季度的贷款，后者分别获得了1730万股和1160万股股票。</p><p><b>但截至2020年6月30日和9月30日，伯克希尔哈撒韦的13F文件中根本没有列出任何西方石油公司的股票，</b>这表明，在石油市场的暴跌中，该公司出售了所购买的1900万股股票，以及作为股息收到的近2900万股股票。</p><p>而现在，随着油价再次走强，巴菲特的投资组合中又出现了石油公司的名字。</p></body></html>","source":"wallstreetcn_api","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>姜还是老的辣！油价暴涨，巴菲特大手笔买入石油公司</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n姜还是老的辣！油价暴涨，巴菲特大手笔买入石油公司\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-03-07 07:55 北京时间&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://wallstreetcn.com/articles/3653483><strong>华尔街见闻</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>全球油价大涨，巴菲特又重拾了两年前清仓的石油股。本周五，美国证券交易委员会的一份新文件显示，巴菲特旗下的伯克希尔哈撒韦公司增持了西方石油公司股份，目前持有股份达到1.13亿股，价值53亿美元。在伯克希尔哈撒韦持有的1.13亿股中，仅有2900多万股为普通股，剩余8300多万股以认股权证形式存在，执行价格为59.624美元。本周五，西方石油公司上涨18%，本周上涨45%，收盘价为56.15美元。随着...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://wallstreetcn.com/articles/3653483\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f3ecc14db02762fcb82cdbb76e654301","relate_stocks":{"BRK.B":"伯克希尔B","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","BK4176":"多领域控股","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓","BK4581":"高盛持仓","BRK.A":"伯克希尔","BK4533":"AQR资本管理(全球第二大对冲基金)"},"source_url":"https://wallstreetcn.com/articles/3653483","is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2217949664","content_text":"全球油价大涨，巴菲特又重拾了两年前清仓的石油股。本周五，美国证券交易委员会的一份新文件显示，巴菲特旗下的伯克希尔哈撒韦公司增持了西方石油公司股份，目前持有股份达到1.13亿股，价值53亿美元。在伯克希尔哈撒韦持有的1.13亿股中，仅有2900多万股为普通股，剩余8300多万股以认股权证形式存在，执行价格为59.624美元。本周五，西方石油公司上涨18%，本周上涨45%，收盘价为56.15美元。随着俄乌争端的爆发，全球油价一路走高，目前已飙升至115美元以上，巴菲特也因此觉察这个机会，大举买入石油公司股票。目前其投资组合中超过6100万股股票是在周三，周四和周五购买的，价格从47.07美元到56.45美元不等。但根据伯克希尔哈撒韦最新的13F文件，截至2021年12月31日，该公司没有持有西方石油公司的股票。目前尚不知晓剩余的股票是在何时买入，因为伯克希尔哈撒韦持有西方石油公司的所有权尚不满10%，监管不要求披露。不过，尽管这些认股权证没有被行使，但出于向证交会提交申请的目的，这些认股权证必须被计算在内，从技术上讲，伯克希尔哈撒韦持有的股份将超过17%。伯克希尔哈撒韦获得的这些权证来自于2019年向西方石油公司提供的100亿美元贷款，帮助其以380亿美元收购阿纳达科公司。这笔贷款以伯克希尔哈撒韦购买优先股的形式发放，要求西方石油公司每年支付8%的股息。也就是每个季度2亿美元。当时巴菲特对CNBC表示，他是在押注油价将长期上涨。不过后来，巴菲特押注的油价在2020年初因新冠疫情爆发而表现不佳。在那年的股东大会上，巴菲特说：“如果你是西方石油股东或任何一家石油生产公司的股东，在油价走向方面你和我都犯了一个错误。”为了节省现金，西方石油公司以股票的形式向伯克希尔哈撒韦支付了第一和第二季度的贷款，后者分别获得了1730万股和1160万股股票。但截至2020年6月30日和9月30日，伯克希尔哈撒韦的13F文件中根本没有列出任何西方石油公司的股票，这表明，在石油市场的暴跌中，该公司出售了所购买的1900万股股票，以及作为股息收到的近2900万股股票。而现在，随着油价再次走强，巴菲特的投资组合中又出现了石油公司的名字。","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":362,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9033732395,"gmtCreate":1646356057282,"gmtModify":1676534121350,"author":{"id":"3570855090477480","authorId":"3570855090477480","name":"Eden8018","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2a67ec57bfd274c18d983a2e0da58ded","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570855090477480","authorIdStr":"3570855090477480"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ppl we always forget we living in the same planet 🥺","listText":"Ppl we always forget we living in the same planet 🥺","text":"Ppl we always forget we living in the same planet 🥺","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9033732395","repostId":"2216432147","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2216432147","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1646355002,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2216432147?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-03-04 08:50","market":"other","language":"en","title":"Ukraine Nuclear Power Plant Zaporizhzhia on Fire, Town Mayor Says","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2216432147","media":"Reuters","summary":"March 4  - The Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant in Ukraine, the largest of its kind in Europe, was on fire early on Friday after an attack by Russian troops, the mayor of the nearby town of Energodar said in an online post.Mayor Dmytro Orlov had earlier reported fierce fighting between Ukrainians and Russian troops near the plant in southeastern Ukraine.\"As a result of continuous enemy shelling of buildings and units of the largest nuclear power plant in Europe, the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power pl","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>March 4 (Reuters) - The Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant in Ukraine, the largest of its kind in Europe, was on fire early on Friday after an attack by Russian troops, the mayor of the nearby town of Energodar said in an online post.</p><p>Mayor Dmytro Orlov had earlier reported fierce fighting between Ukrainians and Russian troops near the plant in southeastern Ukraine.</p><p>&#34;As a result of continuous enemy shelling of buildings and units of the largest nuclear power plant in Europe, the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant is on fire,&#34; Orlov said on his Telegram channel, citing what he called a threat to world security. He did not give details.</p><p>Earlier, Ukrainian authorities reported Russian troops were stepping up efforts to seize the plant and had entered the town with tanks.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Ukraine Nuclear Power Plant Zaporizhzhia on Fire, Town Mayor Says</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nUkraine Nuclear Power Plant Zaporizhzhia on Fire, Town Mayor Says\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-03-04 08:50</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>March 4 (Reuters) - The Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant in Ukraine, the largest of its kind in Europe, was on fire early on Friday after an attack by Russian troops, the mayor of the nearby town of Energodar said in an online post.</p><p>Mayor Dmytro Orlov had earlier reported fierce fighting between Ukrainians and Russian troops near the plant in southeastern Ukraine.</p><p>&#34;As a result of continuous enemy shelling of buildings and units of the largest nuclear power plant in Europe, the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant is on fire,&#34; Orlov said on his Telegram channel, citing what he called a threat to world security. He did not give details.</p><p>Earlier, Ukrainian authorities reported Russian troops were stepping up efforts to seize the plant and had entered the town with tanks.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2216432147","content_text":"March 4 (Reuters) - The Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant in Ukraine, the largest of its kind in Europe, was on fire early on Friday after an attack by Russian troops, the mayor of the nearby town of Energodar said in an online post.Mayor Dmytro Orlov had earlier reported fierce fighting between Ukrainians and Russian troops near the plant in southeastern Ukraine.\"As a result of continuous enemy shelling of buildings and units of the largest nuclear power plant in Europe, the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant is on fire,\" Orlov said on his Telegram channel, citing what he called a threat to world security. He did not give details.Earlier, Ukrainian authorities reported Russian troops were stepping up efforts to seize the plant and had entered the town with tanks.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":401,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9033263992,"gmtCreate":1646286520640,"gmtModify":1676534113108,"author":{"id":"3570855090477480","authorId":"3570855090477480","name":"Eden8018","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2a67ec57bfd274c18d983a2e0da58ded","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570855090477480","authorIdStr":"3570855090477480"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Another challenging of the year&nbsp;","listText":"Another challenging of the year&nbsp;","text":"Another challenging of the year","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9033263992","repostId":"1149870762","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1149870762","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1646284458,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1149870762?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-03-03 13:14","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Tesla's Berlin Plant Receives Final Approval","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1149870762","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"The approval procedure for Tesla's planned factory in Gruenheide, outside Berlin, has been completed, business daily Handelsblatt reported on Thursday.The state premier of Brandenburg, Dietmar Woidke,","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>The approval procedure for Tesla&#39;s planned factory in Gruenheide, outside Berlin, has been completed, business daily Handelsblatt reported on Thursday.</p><p>The state premier of Brandenburg, Dietmar Woidke, would comment on details of the approval decision at a news conference on Friday, Handelsblatt reported without giving any details of its sourcing for the report.</p><p>The newspaper said it could not immediately reach for comment the state environmental agency responsible for the approval, the state environment ministry or the state chancellery.</p><p>Tesla is awaiting approval for a licence to begin production at its electric vehicle (EV) factory and adjacent battery plant in Gruenheide.</p><p>Numerous public consultations focusing primarily on the environmental impact of the site delayed the process, with Tesla Chief Executive Officer Elon Musk expressing irritation on multiple occasions at the complexity of German bureaucracy.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Tesla's Berlin Plant Receives Final Approval</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTesla's Berlin Plant Receives Final Approval\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-03-03 13:14</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>The approval procedure for Tesla&#39;s planned factory in Gruenheide, outside Berlin, has been completed, business daily Handelsblatt reported on Thursday.</p><p>The state premier of Brandenburg, Dietmar Woidke, would comment on details of the approval decision at a news conference on Friday, Handelsblatt reported without giving any details of its sourcing for the report.</p><p>The newspaper said it could not immediately reach for comment the state environmental agency responsible for the approval, the state environment ministry or the state chancellery.</p><p>Tesla is awaiting approval for a licence to begin production at its electric vehicle (EV) factory and adjacent battery plant in Gruenheide.</p><p>Numerous public consultations focusing primarily on the environmental impact of the site delayed the process, with Tesla Chief Executive Officer Elon Musk expressing irritation on multiple occasions at the complexity of German bureaucracy.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1149870762","content_text":"The approval procedure for Tesla's planned factory in Gruenheide, outside Berlin, has been completed, business daily Handelsblatt reported on Thursday.The state premier of Brandenburg, Dietmar Woidke, would comment on details of the approval decision at a news conference on Friday, Handelsblatt reported without giving any details of its sourcing for the report.The newspaper said it could not immediately reach for comment the state environmental agency responsible for the approval, the state environment ministry or the state chancellery.Tesla is awaiting approval for a licence to begin production at its electric vehicle (EV) factory and adjacent battery plant in Gruenheide.Numerous public consultations focusing primarily on the environmental impact of the site delayed the process, with Tesla Chief Executive Officer Elon Musk expressing irritation on multiple occasions at the complexity of German bureaucracy.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":424,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9033344729,"gmtCreate":1646200016655,"gmtModify":1676534103296,"author":{"id":"3570855090477480","authorId":"3570855090477480","name":"Eden8018","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2a67ec57bfd274c18d983a2e0da58ded","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570855090477480","authorIdStr":"3570855090477480"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Fund institue grab the chance but small investor sold it","listText":"Fund institue grab the chance but small investor sold it","text":"Fund institue grab the chance but small investor sold it","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9033344729","repostId":"1162614571","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1162614571","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1646193023,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1162614571?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-03-02 11:50","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Fear, Panic And War Are Bad Reasons To Sell Stocks","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1162614571","media":"TheStreet","summary":"SummaryMany people are concerned that the war in Ukraine will damage their portfolios.It is natural ","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>Summary</b></p><ul><li>Many people are concerned that the war in Ukraine will damage their portfolios.</li><li>It is natural to be worried during scary situations, but history shows that times like now are poor times to sell.</li><li>Generally speaking, stock market declines due to disaster scenarios are very short lived.</li><li>In this article, I will make the case that many stocks (particularly energy stocks) will do just fine in this environment.</li></ul><p>The world is a scary place right now. An armed conflict between Russia and Ukraine has created an atmosphere of panic unlike any in recent memory. Various media outlets have described the crisis as the biggest armed conflict in Europe since World War 2. The days-old conflict has already claimed hundreds of lives, and displaced hundreds of thousands of Ukrainians. It is a very frightening, and tragic, situation.</p><p>So, it shouldn&#39;t come as any surprise that markets have been jittery since the war began. On February 24, the first day after Russia&#39;s invasion, markets opened1.65% lower than they closed the day before. In subsequent trading days, the markets regained what they had lost, and then some. Nevertheless, scary sounding headlines continued to be released for the remainder of the week. Some examples include:</p><ul><li><p>&#34;These 13 Stocks Implode as the World Prepares for War.&#34; (Investor&#39;s Business Daily).</p></li><li><p>&#34;Stocks tank as War Threat intensifies.&#34; (Morningstar).</p></li><li><p>&#34;War Will Give Stocks no Peace.&#34; (Forbes).</p></li></ul><p>The subtext of these headlines couldn&#39;t be clearer:</p><p><i>War is a scary prospect for stock market investors. Be very afraid!</i></p><p>To be sure, there are legitimate reasons to be afraid of war. The human toll is very real, and wars can bring short term economic disruptions as well. The war in Ukraine has reportedly taken energy pipelines offline, contributing to higher energy costs and inflation. So there are very real reasons to be concerned. The question is,<i>&#34;is the stock market one of these reasons?&#34;</i></p><p>Going by history, no. Although the flash point moments in war do tend to be correlated with brief selloffs, stocks recover from these events quickly. There was only one case in the last 100 years in which a war was correlated with a long-term decline in stock prices but, as you&#39;re about to see, the war was not likely what caused stocks to go down that time. Generally speaking, wars can coincide with panic selling, but it doesn&#39;t last long. Given this, it would be foolhardy to sell your stocks right now because of the situation in Eastern Europe.</p><p><b>Wars and Stocks: the Correlation</b></p><p>If we look at historical market data, we can see that the very early moments of wars do tend to be correlated with stock market selloffs. A recentFortune article reviewed five major conflict situations and how they impacted stocks. It concluded that war-related stock market dips do occur, but tend to be short lived. The examples given are:</p><ul><li><p>World War 1: the Dow fell 30%, then was closed for six months, then surged 88% in 1915.</p></li><li><p>World War 2: 2.9% drawdown on the morning of the Pearl Harbor attack. Losses erased within a month.</p></li><li><p>Cuban Missile Crisis: tiny 1.2% selloff followed by a 10% gain for the remainder of the year.</p></li><li><p>9/11: 15% selloff within days of the attack. The market didn&#39;t find a bottom this time until 2002. It then went on to enter a bull market that lasted until 2008.</p></li><li><p>U.S. invading Iraq: stocks jumped 2.3% on the day of the invasion and ended the year up 30%.</p></li></ul><p>I&#39;ve included a chart below, borrowed from Trading Economics, that shows the approximate dates of the events above (except World War 1). Looking at it visually, you can see that all of these war-related events coincided with near term lows, but were followed by long-term gains. The one exception is 9/11: it took stocks nearly a year to find a bottom after that one. However, in that particular case, the long-term downtrend was not actually caused by the attack, as I&#39;ll explain shortly.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76d1ac70f5e16bcef0d0abacea19479d\" tg-width=\"816\" tg-height=\"517\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>Trading Economics</span></p><p>As you can see, 9/11 occurred about halfway through a bear market that began in 2000 and ended in 2002. It was the one &#34;war&#34; related event of the five mentioned in Fortune that was followed by prolonged bearishness. However, it was also the one where there was a lot more than conflict contributing to the selloff. The 9/11 crash occurred about halfway through the Dotcom bubble burst. The bear market of the time was caused by the rapid collapse in prices of high flying tech stocks, some of which went bankrupt and were delisted. Notable examples included:</p><ul><li><p>Pets.com (went bankrupt).</p></li><li><p>Priceline (acquired after falling 94%).</p></li><li><p>Garden.com (shut down after falling to 9 cents a share).</p></li></ul><p>All of these stocks went bust long before 9/11 was part of the conversation. Therefore, it&#39;s hard to say how much of the losses in the 2000-2002 period were due to the bubble collapsing, and how much were due to 9/11. The 2000 bubble collapsed mainly due to valuation concerns, companies experiencing financial strain, and a series of interest rate hikes in1999 and 2000. At the peak, the NASDAQ had a 175 P/E ratio. These factors probably contributed to the 2000-2002 bear market more than any conflict did.</p><p>If we take the post-9/11 selloff without the historical context, then it took the markets a little under a year to recover from the 15% drawdown. That&#39;s not too bad, all things considered. Of course, the markets took much longer to get back to the highs set in 2000. The S&amp;P 500 took six years to get back to the previous top, the NASDAQ a full 15! So the bear market of 2000-2002 was quite long, and the recovery from it was even longer. But again, most of it took place long before 9/11. The losses incurred in the immediate aftermath of that event reversed in less than a year.</p><p><b>Why Isn&#39;t War Bad For Stocks?</b></p><p>Having established that war has not historically been bad for the stock market, the next logical question to ask is, &#34;why?&#34; War is certainly among the most destructive mass-scale activities human beings participate in. Lives are lost, infrastructure is destroyed, people are displaced, and the list just goes on and on. It certainly seems like wars destroy a lot of value. Why, then, do stocks generally go up when they are happening?</p><p>First, it helps to understand how broad the stock market really is.</p><p>To begin with just the U.S., the Wilshire 5000 index consists of 3,500 stocks. It is generally taken as equivalent to the total U.S. stock market. It may exclude some OTC stocks, but it is a pretty good proxy for U.S. listed securities.</p><p>Looking abroad, there are even more stocks to choose from. The OECD says that there are41,000 listed equities globally, and the number rises every year.</p><p>What all of this means is that the universe of stocks is very large. It follows logically from this that different stocks will respond to armed conflict in different ways. While you might find some companies out there that lose money because of armed conflict, you&#39;ll find others that won&#39;t. Some companies will inevitably do just fine. Out of respect for the lives in jeopardy in Eastern Europe right now, I will avoid any talk of arms dealers, defense contractors and other &#34;war beneficiary&#34; stocks. But I will draw your attention to one major industry that serves as a perfect illustration of how companies can thrive during wars:</p><p><b>Energy</b></p><p>As you might be aware, the Russia/Ukraine war has severely disrupted global energy supplies. Russia&#39;s Nord Stream 2 pipeline has been suspended, pipelines in Ukraine have been knocked out, and Western energy companies have withdrawn from Russia. Without a doubt, there are Russian energy companies that could lose a lot of money over this.<b>Gazprom</b>(OTCPK:OGZPY), for example, is heavily invested in the now suspended Nord Stream 2. Its stock had fallen 35% for the year before trading was suspended on February 25th. That&#39;s noteworthy because energy stocks as a whole rose in the same period.</p><p>So, Russian energy stocks are in a bad place right now.</p><p>But remember:</p><p><i>It&#39;s a big world out there.</i></p><p>All of the oil that&#39;s not flowing because of the Russia/Ukraine conflict has to be supplied by someone else. And because of the supply shock, that &#34;someone else&#34; is going to collect higher prices on the oil they sell. When supply decreases but demand is unchanged, prices rise. And right now, the global supply of oil is being reduced.</p><p>There are many companies that can thrive in such an environment. If you look at a Canadian energy company like <b>Suncor Energy</b>(SU), for example, it is about as insulated from the Russia/Ukraine situation as you can imagine. It makes money by selling gasoline to Canadians and by exporting crude oil to Americans. None of this is in any way threatened by the situation in Eastern Europe. Yet oil prices are rising worldwide, even in regions that are not being directly impacted by the conflict. Gasoline prices are rising right along side them. All of this means that Suncor gets to charge higher prices for its products than it did before. That results in higher earnings, as we saw the fourth quarter. In Q4, Suncor&#39;s funds from operations (FFO)grew 157%year-over-year. Net income and operating income swung from losses to profits. That was all thanks to oil prices rising year-over-year. Today, oil prices are even higher than they were in Q4, having set new 7 year highs. So Suncor should do even better in Q1.</p><p>What this example illustrates is the fact that equities can respond to crises in surprising ways. Sure, some are damaged by pandemonium, but others can do just fine. Overall, the presence of disorder in the world shouldn&#39;t affect your outlook. As history shows, it has little effect on the markets.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Fear, Panic And War Are Bad Reasons To Sell Stocks</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFear, Panic And War Are Bad Reasons To Sell Stocks\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-03-02 11:50 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.thestreet.com/apple/news/how-important-is-russia-to-apples-business><strong>TheStreet</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>SummaryMany people are concerned that the war in Ukraine will damage their portfolios.It is natural to be worried during scary situations, but history shows that times like now are poor times to sell....</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.thestreet.com/apple/news/how-important-is-russia-to-apples-business\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://www.thestreet.com/apple/news/how-important-is-russia-to-apples-business","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1162614571","content_text":"SummaryMany people are concerned that the war in Ukraine will damage their portfolios.It is natural to be worried during scary situations, but history shows that times like now are poor times to sell.Generally speaking, stock market declines due to disaster scenarios are very short lived.In this article, I will make the case that many stocks (particularly energy stocks) will do just fine in this environment.The world is a scary place right now. An armed conflict between Russia and Ukraine has created an atmosphere of panic unlike any in recent memory. Various media outlets have described the crisis as the biggest armed conflict in Europe since World War 2. The days-old conflict has already claimed hundreds of lives, and displaced hundreds of thousands of Ukrainians. It is a very frightening, and tragic, situation.So, it shouldn't come as any surprise that markets have been jittery since the war began. On February 24, the first day after Russia's invasion, markets opened1.65% lower than they closed the day before. In subsequent trading days, the markets regained what they had lost, and then some. Nevertheless, scary sounding headlines continued to be released for the remainder of the week. Some examples include:\"These 13 Stocks Implode as the World Prepares for War.\" (Investor's Business Daily).\"Stocks tank as War Threat intensifies.\" (Morningstar).\"War Will Give Stocks no Peace.\" (Forbes).The subtext of these headlines couldn't be clearer:War is a scary prospect for stock market investors. Be very afraid!To be sure, there are legitimate reasons to be afraid of war. The human toll is very real, and wars can bring short term economic disruptions as well. The war in Ukraine has reportedly taken energy pipelines offline, contributing to higher energy costs and inflation. So there are very real reasons to be concerned. The question is,\"is the stock market one of these reasons?\"Going by history, no. Although the flash point moments in war do tend to be correlated with brief selloffs, stocks recover from these events quickly. There was only one case in the last 100 years in which a war was correlated with a long-term decline in stock prices but, as you're about to see, the war was not likely what caused stocks to go down that time. Generally speaking, wars can coincide with panic selling, but it doesn't last long. Given this, it would be foolhardy to sell your stocks right now because of the situation in Eastern Europe.Wars and Stocks: the CorrelationIf we look at historical market data, we can see that the very early moments of wars do tend to be correlated with stock market selloffs. A recentFortune article reviewed five major conflict situations and how they impacted stocks. It concluded that war-related stock market dips do occur, but tend to be short lived. The examples given are:World War 1: the Dow fell 30%, then was closed for six months, then surged 88% in 1915.World War 2: 2.9% drawdown on the morning of the Pearl Harbor attack. Losses erased within a month.Cuban Missile Crisis: tiny 1.2% selloff followed by a 10% gain for the remainder of the year.9/11: 15% selloff within days of the attack. The market didn't find a bottom this time until 2002. It then went on to enter a bull market that lasted until 2008.U.S. invading Iraq: stocks jumped 2.3% on the day of the invasion and ended the year up 30%.I've included a chart below, borrowed from Trading Economics, that shows the approximate dates of the events above (except World War 1). Looking at it visually, you can see that all of these war-related events coincided with near term lows, but were followed by long-term gains. The one exception is 9/11: it took stocks nearly a year to find a bottom after that one. However, in that particular case, the long-term downtrend was not actually caused by the attack, as I'll explain shortly.Trading EconomicsAs you can see, 9/11 occurred about halfway through a bear market that began in 2000 and ended in 2002. It was the one \"war\" related event of the five mentioned in Fortune that was followed by prolonged bearishness. However, it was also the one where there was a lot more than conflict contributing to the selloff. The 9/11 crash occurred about halfway through the Dotcom bubble burst. The bear market of the time was caused by the rapid collapse in prices of high flying tech stocks, some of which went bankrupt and were delisted. Notable examples included:Pets.com (went bankrupt).Priceline (acquired after falling 94%).Garden.com (shut down after falling to 9 cents a share).All of these stocks went bust long before 9/11 was part of the conversation. Therefore, it's hard to say how much of the losses in the 2000-2002 period were due to the bubble collapsing, and how much were due to 9/11. The 2000 bubble collapsed mainly due to valuation concerns, companies experiencing financial strain, and a series of interest rate hikes in1999 and 2000. At the peak, the NASDAQ had a 175 P/E ratio. These factors probably contributed to the 2000-2002 bear market more than any conflict did.If we take the post-9/11 selloff without the historical context, then it took the markets a little under a year to recover from the 15% drawdown. That's not too bad, all things considered. Of course, the markets took much longer to get back to the highs set in 2000. The S&P 500 took six years to get back to the previous top, the NASDAQ a full 15! So the bear market of 2000-2002 was quite long, and the recovery from it was even longer. But again, most of it took place long before 9/11. The losses incurred in the immediate aftermath of that event reversed in less than a year.Why Isn't War Bad For Stocks?Having established that war has not historically been bad for the stock market, the next logical question to ask is, \"why?\" War is certainly among the most destructive mass-scale activities human beings participate in. Lives are lost, infrastructure is destroyed, people are displaced, and the list just goes on and on. It certainly seems like wars destroy a lot of value. Why, then, do stocks generally go up when they are happening?First, it helps to understand how broad the stock market really is.To begin with just the U.S., the Wilshire 5000 index consists of 3,500 stocks. It is generally taken as equivalent to the total U.S. stock market. It may exclude some OTC stocks, but it is a pretty good proxy for U.S. listed securities.Looking abroad, there are even more stocks to choose from. The OECD says that there are41,000 listed equities globally, and the number rises every year.What all of this means is that the universe of stocks is very large. It follows logically from this that different stocks will respond to armed conflict in different ways. While you might find some companies out there that lose money because of armed conflict, you'll find others that won't. Some companies will inevitably do just fine. Out of respect for the lives in jeopardy in Eastern Europe right now, I will avoid any talk of arms dealers, defense contractors and other \"war beneficiary\" stocks. But I will draw your attention to one major industry that serves as a perfect illustration of how companies can thrive during wars:EnergyAs you might be aware, the Russia/Ukraine war has severely disrupted global energy supplies. Russia's Nord Stream 2 pipeline has been suspended, pipelines in Ukraine have been knocked out, and Western energy companies have withdrawn from Russia. Without a doubt, there are Russian energy companies that could lose a lot of money over this.Gazprom(OTCPK:OGZPY), for example, is heavily invested in the now suspended Nord Stream 2. Its stock had fallen 35% for the year before trading was suspended on February 25th. That's noteworthy because energy stocks as a whole rose in the same period.So, Russian energy stocks are in a bad place right now.But remember:It's a big world out there.All of the oil that's not flowing because of the Russia/Ukraine conflict has to be supplied by someone else. And because of the supply shock, that \"someone else\" is going to collect higher prices on the oil they sell. When supply decreases but demand is unchanged, prices rise. And right now, the global supply of oil is being reduced.There are many companies that can thrive in such an environment. If you look at a Canadian energy company like Suncor Energy(SU), for example, it is about as insulated from the Russia/Ukraine situation as you can imagine. It makes money by selling gasoline to Canadians and by exporting crude oil to Americans. None of this is in any way threatened by the situation in Eastern Europe. Yet oil prices are rising worldwide, even in regions that are not being directly impacted by the conflict. Gasoline prices are rising right along side them. All of this means that Suncor gets to charge higher prices for its products than it did before. That results in higher earnings, as we saw the fourth quarter. In Q4, Suncor's funds from operations (FFO)grew 157%year-over-year. Net income and operating income swung from losses to profits. That was all thanks to oil prices rising year-over-year. Today, oil prices are even higher than they were in Q4, having set new 7 year highs. So Suncor should do even better in Q1.What this example illustrates is the fact that equities can respond to crises in surprising ways. Sure, some are damaged by pandemonium, but others can do just fine. Overall, the presence of disorder in the world shouldn't affect your outlook. As history shows, it has little effect on the markets.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":313,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9001158505,"gmtCreate":1641199276929,"gmtModify":1676533581969,"author":{"id":"3570855090477480","authorId":"3570855090477480","name":"Eden8018","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2a67ec57bfd274c18d983a2e0da58ded","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570855090477480","authorIdStr":"3570855090477480"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Another drop because of China regulation","listText":"Another drop because of China regulation","text":"Another drop because of China regulation","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9001158505","repostId":"1154309326","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1154309326","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Stock Market Quotes, Business News, Financial News, Trading Ideas, and Stock Research by Professionals","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Benzinga","id":"1052270027","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa"},"pubTimestamp":1641170534,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1154309326?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-01-03 08:42","market":"us","language":"en","title":"China to Cut EV Subsidies By 30% In 2022: What That Means For Tesla, Nio, XPeng And Others","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1154309326","media":"Benzinga","summary":"China has confirmed subsidy reduction for new energy vehicles (NEV), beginning in 2022, and it is ea","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>China has confirmed subsidy reduction for new energy vehicles (NEV), beginning in 2022, and it is early to assess whether it will impact EV adoption in the hot-and-happening Chinese economy. NEVs include EVs, plug-in hybrids and hydrogen fuel-cell energy vehicles.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c7c6c88cc98e5c683282b444ec94922f\" tg-width=\"685\" tg-height=\"375\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p><b>What Happened:</b>China will slash NEV subsidies by 30% in the new year, the country&#39;s Ministry of Finance confirmed in a statement on its website. Subsidies will be withdrawn completely at the end of the year, the ministry added.</p><p>Subsidies for NEVs meant for public transport will be lowered by 20%. China has set a target of NEVs accounting for 20% of new vehicles sold by 2025.</p><p><b>Why It&#39;s Important:</b>In an anticipatory move,<b>Nio, Inc.</b> announced in early December if a customer preorders a vehicle with a deposit before midnight on Dec. 31, 2021 and takes delivery before March 31, 2022, it will absorb the difference between the old subsidy and the new subsidy, according to CnEVPost.</p><p>Nio can also benefit from another provision laid out by the government. China&#39;s NEV subsidy policy dictates that models with a pre-subsidy price of over 300,000 yuan ($47,200) are not eligible for subsidies, except those that support battery swapping, CnEVPost said in another report.</p><p>All of Nio&#39;s current models are priced above 300,000 yuan before subsidies, although the EV maker is speculated to be working on a mass market model under a different brand name.The company reportedly does not set different subsidies for different models, but rather base them on the model&#39;s battery pack.</p><p>Individual consumers are eligible to receive a subsidy of 11,340 yuan for a model with a standard 75 kilowatt-hour battery pack, and 12,600 yuan for a 100 kWh battery pack, the report said, citing the company&#39;s latest subsidy package. Companies purchasing a Nio vehicle get 70% of the amount available to individual consumers, according to the report.</p><p>Nio&#39;s domestic rival <b>XPeng, Inc.</b> is also looking to scale back purchase benefits to customers by about half, keeping in mind the subsidy cut, CnEVPost reported, citing local media outlet Auto-time. This is applicable to all theXPeng&#39;sthree models currently on the market, namely the G3i, P5 and P7.</p><p><b>Tesla, Inc.</b>, meanwhile, is continuing with a price hike spree amid the subsidy cut taking effect in China.</p><p>Tesla announced Friday it is raising prices of its made-in-China, or MIC, Model 3 vehicles to 265,652 yuan after subsidy, up 10,000 yuan or 3.9%, according to South China Morning Post. As A As recently as late November, the company instituted a price increase of 4,752 yuan.</p><p>The price of the Model Y SUV was also hiked by 7.5% to 301,840 yuan, the report added. The SUV will no longer qualify for subsidies.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>China to Cut EV Subsidies By 30% In 2022: What That Means For Tesla, Nio, XPeng And Others</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nChina to Cut EV Subsidies By 30% In 2022: What That Means For Tesla, Nio, XPeng And Others\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Benzinga </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-01-03 08:42</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>China has confirmed subsidy reduction for new energy vehicles (NEV), beginning in 2022, and it is early to assess whether it will impact EV adoption in the hot-and-happening Chinese economy. NEVs include EVs, plug-in hybrids and hydrogen fuel-cell energy vehicles.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c7c6c88cc98e5c683282b444ec94922f\" tg-width=\"685\" tg-height=\"375\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p><b>What Happened:</b>China will slash NEV subsidies by 30% in the new year, the country&#39;s Ministry of Finance confirmed in a statement on its website. Subsidies will be withdrawn completely at the end of the year, the ministry added.</p><p>Subsidies for NEVs meant for public transport will be lowered by 20%. China has set a target of NEVs accounting for 20% of new vehicles sold by 2025.</p><p><b>Why It&#39;s Important:</b>In an anticipatory move,<b>Nio, Inc.</b> announced in early December if a customer preorders a vehicle with a deposit before midnight on Dec. 31, 2021 and takes delivery before March 31, 2022, it will absorb the difference between the old subsidy and the new subsidy, according to CnEVPost.</p><p>Nio can also benefit from another provision laid out by the government. China&#39;s NEV subsidy policy dictates that models with a pre-subsidy price of over 300,000 yuan ($47,200) are not eligible for subsidies, except those that support battery swapping, CnEVPost said in another report.</p><p>All of Nio&#39;s current models are priced above 300,000 yuan before subsidies, although the EV maker is speculated to be working on a mass market model under a different brand name.The company reportedly does not set different subsidies for different models, but rather base them on the model&#39;s battery pack.</p><p>Individual consumers are eligible to receive a subsidy of 11,340 yuan for a model with a standard 75 kilowatt-hour battery pack, and 12,600 yuan for a 100 kWh battery pack, the report said, citing the company&#39;s latest subsidy package. Companies purchasing a Nio vehicle get 70% of the amount available to individual consumers, according to the report.</p><p>Nio&#39;s domestic rival <b>XPeng, Inc.</b> is also looking to scale back purchase benefits to customers by about half, keeping in mind the subsidy cut, CnEVPost reported, citing local media outlet Auto-time. This is applicable to all theXPeng&#39;sthree models currently on the market, namely the G3i, P5 and P7.</p><p><b>Tesla, Inc.</b>, meanwhile, is continuing with a price hike spree amid the subsidy cut taking effect in China.</p><p>Tesla announced Friday it is raising prices of its made-in-China, or MIC, Model 3 vehicles to 265,652 yuan after subsidy, up 10,000 yuan or 3.9%, according to South China Morning Post. As A As recently as late November, the company instituted a price increase of 4,752 yuan.</p><p>The price of the Model Y SUV was also hiked by 7.5% to 301,840 yuan, the report added. The SUV will no longer qualify for subsidies.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NIO":"蔚来","TSLA":"特斯拉","XPEV":"小鹏汽车","LI":"理想汽车"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1154309326","content_text":"China has confirmed subsidy reduction for new energy vehicles (NEV), beginning in 2022, and it is early to assess whether it will impact EV adoption in the hot-and-happening Chinese economy. NEVs include EVs, plug-in hybrids and hydrogen fuel-cell energy vehicles.What Happened:China will slash NEV subsidies by 30% in the new year, the country's Ministry of Finance confirmed in a statement on its website. Subsidies will be withdrawn completely at the end of the year, the ministry added.Subsidies for NEVs meant for public transport will be lowered by 20%. China has set a target of NEVs accounting for 20% of new vehicles sold by 2025.Why It's Important:In an anticipatory move,Nio, Inc. announced in early December if a customer preorders a vehicle with a deposit before midnight on Dec. 31, 2021 and takes delivery before March 31, 2022, it will absorb the difference between the old subsidy and the new subsidy, according to CnEVPost.Nio can also benefit from another provision laid out by the government. China's NEV subsidy policy dictates that models with a pre-subsidy price of over 300,000 yuan ($47,200) are not eligible for subsidies, except those that support battery swapping, CnEVPost said in another report.All of Nio's current models are priced above 300,000 yuan before subsidies, although the EV maker is speculated to be working on a mass market model under a different brand name.The company reportedly does not set different subsidies for different models, but rather base them on the model's battery pack.Individual consumers are eligible to receive a subsidy of 11,340 yuan for a model with a standard 75 kilowatt-hour battery pack, and 12,600 yuan for a 100 kWh battery pack, the report said, citing the company's latest subsidy package. Companies purchasing a Nio vehicle get 70% of the amount available to individual consumers, according to the report.Nio's domestic rival XPeng, Inc. is also looking to scale back purchase benefits to customers by about half, keeping in mind the subsidy cut, CnEVPost reported, citing local media outlet Auto-time. This is applicable to all theXPeng'sthree models currently on the market, namely the G3i, P5 and P7.Tesla, Inc., meanwhile, is continuing with a price hike spree amid the subsidy cut taking effect in China.Tesla announced Friday it is raising prices of its made-in-China, or MIC, Model 3 vehicles to 265,652 yuan after subsidy, up 10,000 yuan or 3.9%, according to South China Morning Post. As A As recently as late November, the company instituted a price increase of 4,752 yuan.The price of the Model Y SUV was also hiked by 7.5% to 301,840 yuan, the report added. The SUV will no longer qualify for subsidies.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":420,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":9033344729,"gmtCreate":1646200016655,"gmtModify":1676534103296,"author":{"id":"3570855090477480","authorId":"3570855090477480","name":"Eden8018","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2a67ec57bfd274c18d983a2e0da58ded","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570855090477480","authorIdStr":"3570855090477480"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Fund institue grab the chance but small investor sold it","listText":"Fund institue grab the chance but small investor sold it","text":"Fund institue grab the chance but small investor sold it","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9033344729","repostId":"1162614571","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1162614571","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1646193023,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1162614571?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-03-02 11:50","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Fear, Panic And War Are Bad Reasons To Sell Stocks","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1162614571","media":"TheStreet","summary":"SummaryMany people are concerned that the war in Ukraine will damage their portfolios.It is natural ","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>Summary</b></p><ul><li>Many people are concerned that the war in Ukraine will damage their portfolios.</li><li>It is natural to be worried during scary situations, but history shows that times like now are poor times to sell.</li><li>Generally speaking, stock market declines due to disaster scenarios are very short lived.</li><li>In this article, I will make the case that many stocks (particularly energy stocks) will do just fine in this environment.</li></ul><p>The world is a scary place right now. An armed conflict between Russia and Ukraine has created an atmosphere of panic unlike any in recent memory. Various media outlets have described the crisis as the biggest armed conflict in Europe since World War 2. The days-old conflict has already claimed hundreds of lives, and displaced hundreds of thousands of Ukrainians. It is a very frightening, and tragic, situation.</p><p>So, it shouldn&#39;t come as any surprise that markets have been jittery since the war began. On February 24, the first day after Russia&#39;s invasion, markets opened1.65% lower than they closed the day before. In subsequent trading days, the markets regained what they had lost, and then some. Nevertheless, scary sounding headlines continued to be released for the remainder of the week. Some examples include:</p><ul><li><p>&#34;These 13 Stocks Implode as the World Prepares for War.&#34; (Investor&#39;s Business Daily).</p></li><li><p>&#34;Stocks tank as War Threat intensifies.&#34; (Morningstar).</p></li><li><p>&#34;War Will Give Stocks no Peace.&#34; (Forbes).</p></li></ul><p>The subtext of these headlines couldn&#39;t be clearer:</p><p><i>War is a scary prospect for stock market investors. Be very afraid!</i></p><p>To be sure, there are legitimate reasons to be afraid of war. The human toll is very real, and wars can bring short term economic disruptions as well. The war in Ukraine has reportedly taken energy pipelines offline, contributing to higher energy costs and inflation. So there are very real reasons to be concerned. The question is,<i>&#34;is the stock market one of these reasons?&#34;</i></p><p>Going by history, no. Although the flash point moments in war do tend to be correlated with brief selloffs, stocks recover from these events quickly. There was only one case in the last 100 years in which a war was correlated with a long-term decline in stock prices but, as you&#39;re about to see, the war was not likely what caused stocks to go down that time. Generally speaking, wars can coincide with panic selling, but it doesn&#39;t last long. Given this, it would be foolhardy to sell your stocks right now because of the situation in Eastern Europe.</p><p><b>Wars and Stocks: the Correlation</b></p><p>If we look at historical market data, we can see that the very early moments of wars do tend to be correlated with stock market selloffs. A recentFortune article reviewed five major conflict situations and how they impacted stocks. It concluded that war-related stock market dips do occur, but tend to be short lived. The examples given are:</p><ul><li><p>World War 1: the Dow fell 30%, then was closed for six months, then surged 88% in 1915.</p></li><li><p>World War 2: 2.9% drawdown on the morning of the Pearl Harbor attack. Losses erased within a month.</p></li><li><p>Cuban Missile Crisis: tiny 1.2% selloff followed by a 10% gain for the remainder of the year.</p></li><li><p>9/11: 15% selloff within days of the attack. The market didn&#39;t find a bottom this time until 2002. It then went on to enter a bull market that lasted until 2008.</p></li><li><p>U.S. invading Iraq: stocks jumped 2.3% on the day of the invasion and ended the year up 30%.</p></li></ul><p>I&#39;ve included a chart below, borrowed from Trading Economics, that shows the approximate dates of the events above (except World War 1). Looking at it visually, you can see that all of these war-related events coincided with near term lows, but were followed by long-term gains. The one exception is 9/11: it took stocks nearly a year to find a bottom after that one. However, in that particular case, the long-term downtrend was not actually caused by the attack, as I&#39;ll explain shortly.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76d1ac70f5e16bcef0d0abacea19479d\" tg-width=\"816\" tg-height=\"517\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>Trading Economics</span></p><p>As you can see, 9/11 occurred about halfway through a bear market that began in 2000 and ended in 2002. It was the one &#34;war&#34; related event of the five mentioned in Fortune that was followed by prolonged bearishness. However, it was also the one where there was a lot more than conflict contributing to the selloff. The 9/11 crash occurred about halfway through the Dotcom bubble burst. The bear market of the time was caused by the rapid collapse in prices of high flying tech stocks, some of which went bankrupt and were delisted. Notable examples included:</p><ul><li><p>Pets.com (went bankrupt).</p></li><li><p>Priceline (acquired after falling 94%).</p></li><li><p>Garden.com (shut down after falling to 9 cents a share).</p></li></ul><p>All of these stocks went bust long before 9/11 was part of the conversation. Therefore, it&#39;s hard to say how much of the losses in the 2000-2002 period were due to the bubble collapsing, and how much were due to 9/11. The 2000 bubble collapsed mainly due to valuation concerns, companies experiencing financial strain, and a series of interest rate hikes in1999 and 2000. At the peak, the NASDAQ had a 175 P/E ratio. These factors probably contributed to the 2000-2002 bear market more than any conflict did.</p><p>If we take the post-9/11 selloff without the historical context, then it took the markets a little under a year to recover from the 15% drawdown. That&#39;s not too bad, all things considered. Of course, the markets took much longer to get back to the highs set in 2000. The S&amp;P 500 took six years to get back to the previous top, the NASDAQ a full 15! So the bear market of 2000-2002 was quite long, and the recovery from it was even longer. But again, most of it took place long before 9/11. The losses incurred in the immediate aftermath of that event reversed in less than a year.</p><p><b>Why Isn&#39;t War Bad For Stocks?</b></p><p>Having established that war has not historically been bad for the stock market, the next logical question to ask is, &#34;why?&#34; War is certainly among the most destructive mass-scale activities human beings participate in. Lives are lost, infrastructure is destroyed, people are displaced, and the list just goes on and on. It certainly seems like wars destroy a lot of value. Why, then, do stocks generally go up when they are happening?</p><p>First, it helps to understand how broad the stock market really is.</p><p>To begin with just the U.S., the Wilshire 5000 index consists of 3,500 stocks. It is generally taken as equivalent to the total U.S. stock market. It may exclude some OTC stocks, but it is a pretty good proxy for U.S. listed securities.</p><p>Looking abroad, there are even more stocks to choose from. The OECD says that there are41,000 listed equities globally, and the number rises every year.</p><p>What all of this means is that the universe of stocks is very large. It follows logically from this that different stocks will respond to armed conflict in different ways. While you might find some companies out there that lose money because of armed conflict, you&#39;ll find others that won&#39;t. Some companies will inevitably do just fine. Out of respect for the lives in jeopardy in Eastern Europe right now, I will avoid any talk of arms dealers, defense contractors and other &#34;war beneficiary&#34; stocks. But I will draw your attention to one major industry that serves as a perfect illustration of how companies can thrive during wars:</p><p><b>Energy</b></p><p>As you might be aware, the Russia/Ukraine war has severely disrupted global energy supplies. Russia&#39;s Nord Stream 2 pipeline has been suspended, pipelines in Ukraine have been knocked out, and Western energy companies have withdrawn from Russia. Without a doubt, there are Russian energy companies that could lose a lot of money over this.<b>Gazprom</b>(OTCPK:OGZPY), for example, is heavily invested in the now suspended Nord Stream 2. Its stock had fallen 35% for the year before trading was suspended on February 25th. That&#39;s noteworthy because energy stocks as a whole rose in the same period.</p><p>So, Russian energy stocks are in a bad place right now.</p><p>But remember:</p><p><i>It&#39;s a big world out there.</i></p><p>All of the oil that&#39;s not flowing because of the Russia/Ukraine conflict has to be supplied by someone else. And because of the supply shock, that &#34;someone else&#34; is going to collect higher prices on the oil they sell. When supply decreases but demand is unchanged, prices rise. And right now, the global supply of oil is being reduced.</p><p>There are many companies that can thrive in such an environment. If you look at a Canadian energy company like <b>Suncor Energy</b>(SU), for example, it is about as insulated from the Russia/Ukraine situation as you can imagine. It makes money by selling gasoline to Canadians and by exporting crude oil to Americans. None of this is in any way threatened by the situation in Eastern Europe. Yet oil prices are rising worldwide, even in regions that are not being directly impacted by the conflict. Gasoline prices are rising right along side them. All of this means that Suncor gets to charge higher prices for its products than it did before. That results in higher earnings, as we saw the fourth quarter. In Q4, Suncor&#39;s funds from operations (FFO)grew 157%year-over-year. Net income and operating income swung from losses to profits. That was all thanks to oil prices rising year-over-year. Today, oil prices are even higher than they were in Q4, having set new 7 year highs. So Suncor should do even better in Q1.</p><p>What this example illustrates is the fact that equities can respond to crises in surprising ways. Sure, some are damaged by pandemonium, but others can do just fine. Overall, the presence of disorder in the world shouldn&#39;t affect your outlook. As history shows, it has little effect on the markets.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Fear, Panic And War Are Bad Reasons To Sell Stocks</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFear, Panic And War Are Bad Reasons To Sell Stocks\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-03-02 11:50 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.thestreet.com/apple/news/how-important-is-russia-to-apples-business><strong>TheStreet</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>SummaryMany people are concerned that the war in Ukraine will damage their portfolios.It is natural to be worried during scary situations, but history shows that times like now are poor times to sell....</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.thestreet.com/apple/news/how-important-is-russia-to-apples-business\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://www.thestreet.com/apple/news/how-important-is-russia-to-apples-business","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1162614571","content_text":"SummaryMany people are concerned that the war in Ukraine will damage their portfolios.It is natural to be worried during scary situations, but history shows that times like now are poor times to sell.Generally speaking, stock market declines due to disaster scenarios are very short lived.In this article, I will make the case that many stocks (particularly energy stocks) will do just fine in this environment.The world is a scary place right now. An armed conflict between Russia and Ukraine has created an atmosphere of panic unlike any in recent memory. Various media outlets have described the crisis as the biggest armed conflict in Europe since World War 2. The days-old conflict has already claimed hundreds of lives, and displaced hundreds of thousands of Ukrainians. It is a very frightening, and tragic, situation.So, it shouldn't come as any surprise that markets have been jittery since the war began. On February 24, the first day after Russia's invasion, markets opened1.65% lower than they closed the day before. In subsequent trading days, the markets regained what they had lost, and then some. Nevertheless, scary sounding headlines continued to be released for the remainder of the week. Some examples include:\"These 13 Stocks Implode as the World Prepares for War.\" (Investor's Business Daily).\"Stocks tank as War Threat intensifies.\" (Morningstar).\"War Will Give Stocks no Peace.\" (Forbes).The subtext of these headlines couldn't be clearer:War is a scary prospect for stock market investors. Be very afraid!To be sure, there are legitimate reasons to be afraid of war. The human toll is very real, and wars can bring short term economic disruptions as well. The war in Ukraine has reportedly taken energy pipelines offline, contributing to higher energy costs and inflation. So there are very real reasons to be concerned. The question is,\"is the stock market one of these reasons?\"Going by history, no. Although the flash point moments in war do tend to be correlated with brief selloffs, stocks recover from these events quickly. There was only one case in the last 100 years in which a war was correlated with a long-term decline in stock prices but, as you're about to see, the war was not likely what caused stocks to go down that time. Generally speaking, wars can coincide with panic selling, but it doesn't last long. Given this, it would be foolhardy to sell your stocks right now because of the situation in Eastern Europe.Wars and Stocks: the CorrelationIf we look at historical market data, we can see that the very early moments of wars do tend to be correlated with stock market selloffs. A recentFortune article reviewed five major conflict situations and how they impacted stocks. It concluded that war-related stock market dips do occur, but tend to be short lived. The examples given are:World War 1: the Dow fell 30%, then was closed for six months, then surged 88% in 1915.World War 2: 2.9% drawdown on the morning of the Pearl Harbor attack. Losses erased within a month.Cuban Missile Crisis: tiny 1.2% selloff followed by a 10% gain for the remainder of the year.9/11: 15% selloff within days of the attack. The market didn't find a bottom this time until 2002. It then went on to enter a bull market that lasted until 2008.U.S. invading Iraq: stocks jumped 2.3% on the day of the invasion and ended the year up 30%.I've included a chart below, borrowed from Trading Economics, that shows the approximate dates of the events above (except World War 1). Looking at it visually, you can see that all of these war-related events coincided with near term lows, but were followed by long-term gains. The one exception is 9/11: it took stocks nearly a year to find a bottom after that one. However, in that particular case, the long-term downtrend was not actually caused by the attack, as I'll explain shortly.Trading EconomicsAs you can see, 9/11 occurred about halfway through a bear market that began in 2000 and ended in 2002. It was the one \"war\" related event of the five mentioned in Fortune that was followed by prolonged bearishness. However, it was also the one where there was a lot more than conflict contributing to the selloff. The 9/11 crash occurred about halfway through the Dotcom bubble burst. The bear market of the time was caused by the rapid collapse in prices of high flying tech stocks, some of which went bankrupt and were delisted. Notable examples included:Pets.com (went bankrupt).Priceline (acquired after falling 94%).Garden.com (shut down after falling to 9 cents a share).All of these stocks went bust long before 9/11 was part of the conversation. Therefore, it's hard to say how much of the losses in the 2000-2002 period were due to the bubble collapsing, and how much were due to 9/11. The 2000 bubble collapsed mainly due to valuation concerns, companies experiencing financial strain, and a series of interest rate hikes in1999 and 2000. At the peak, the NASDAQ had a 175 P/E ratio. These factors probably contributed to the 2000-2002 bear market more than any conflict did.If we take the post-9/11 selloff without the historical context, then it took the markets a little under a year to recover from the 15% drawdown. That's not too bad, all things considered. Of course, the markets took much longer to get back to the highs set in 2000. The S&P 500 took six years to get back to the previous top, the NASDAQ a full 15! So the bear market of 2000-2002 was quite long, and the recovery from it was even longer. But again, most of it took place long before 9/11. The losses incurred in the immediate aftermath of that event reversed in less than a year.Why Isn't War Bad For Stocks?Having established that war has not historically been bad for the stock market, the next logical question to ask is, \"why?\" War is certainly among the most destructive mass-scale activities human beings participate in. Lives are lost, infrastructure is destroyed, people are displaced, and the list just goes on and on. It certainly seems like wars destroy a lot of value. Why, then, do stocks generally go up when they are happening?First, it helps to understand how broad the stock market really is.To begin with just the U.S., the Wilshire 5000 index consists of 3,500 stocks. It is generally taken as equivalent to the total U.S. stock market. It may exclude some OTC stocks, but it is a pretty good proxy for U.S. listed securities.Looking abroad, there are even more stocks to choose from. The OECD says that there are41,000 listed equities globally, and the number rises every year.What all of this means is that the universe of stocks is very large. It follows logically from this that different stocks will respond to armed conflict in different ways. While you might find some companies out there that lose money because of armed conflict, you'll find others that won't. Some companies will inevitably do just fine. Out of respect for the lives in jeopardy in Eastern Europe right now, I will avoid any talk of arms dealers, defense contractors and other \"war beneficiary\" stocks. But I will draw your attention to one major industry that serves as a perfect illustration of how companies can thrive during wars:EnergyAs you might be aware, the Russia/Ukraine war has severely disrupted global energy supplies. Russia's Nord Stream 2 pipeline has been suspended, pipelines in Ukraine have been knocked out, and Western energy companies have withdrawn from Russia. Without a doubt, there are Russian energy companies that could lose a lot of money over this.Gazprom(OTCPK:OGZPY), for example, is heavily invested in the now suspended Nord Stream 2. Its stock had fallen 35% for the year before trading was suspended on February 25th. That's noteworthy because energy stocks as a whole rose in the same period.So, Russian energy stocks are in a bad place right now.But remember:It's a big world out there.All of the oil that's not flowing because of the Russia/Ukraine conflict has to be supplied by someone else. And because of the supply shock, that \"someone else\" is going to collect higher prices on the oil they sell. When supply decreases but demand is unchanged, prices rise. And right now, the global supply of oil is being reduced.There are many companies that can thrive in such an environment. If you look at a Canadian energy company like Suncor Energy(SU), for example, it is about as insulated from the Russia/Ukraine situation as you can imagine. It makes money by selling gasoline to Canadians and by exporting crude oil to Americans. None of this is in any way threatened by the situation in Eastern Europe. Yet oil prices are rising worldwide, even in regions that are not being directly impacted by the conflict. Gasoline prices are rising right along side them. All of this means that Suncor gets to charge higher prices for its products than it did before. That results in higher earnings, as we saw the fourth quarter. In Q4, Suncor's funds from operations (FFO)grew 157%year-over-year. Net income and operating income swung from losses to profits. That was all thanks to oil prices rising year-over-year. Today, oil prices are even higher than they were in Q4, having set new 7 year highs. So Suncor should do even better in Q1.What this example illustrates is the fact that equities can respond to crises in surprising ways. Sure, some are damaged by pandemonium, but others can do just fine. Overall, the presence of disorder in the world shouldn't affect your outlook. As history shows, it has little effect on the markets.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":313,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9011238109,"gmtCreate":1648867339743,"gmtModify":1676534414644,"author":{"id":"3570855090477480","authorId":"3570855090477480","name":"Eden8018","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2a67ec57bfd274c18d983a2e0da58ded","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570855090477480","authorIdStr":"3570855090477480"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Did feel great to drop more lower 😜😜😜","listText":"Did feel great to drop more lower 😜😜😜","text":"Did feel great to drop more lower 😜😜😜","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9011238109","repostId":"1151157270","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1151157270","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1648866517,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1151157270?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-04-02 10:28","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why Is Qualcomm Stock Down Today?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1151157270","media":"InvestorPlace","summary":"Today, Apple and Qualcomm are both in the red, following an analyst update and a reversal of consume","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Today, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">Apple</a> and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/QCOM\">Qualcomm</a> are both in the red, following an analyst update and a reversal of consumer discretionary trends. For QCOM stock specifically, a drop of 3.81% on Friday highlights just how bearish today’s price action has been for some top technology companies.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b0893962a2138698601906046e9152cc\" tg-width=\"300\" tg-height=\"169\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: Xixi Fu / Shutterstock.com</p><p>Qualcomm and Apple have been joined at the hip for some time. That’s because Qualcomm is a major chip supplier for Apple’s phones. Accordingly, analysts tend to bucket the two together when looking at consumer spending trends within the smartphone space.</p><p>Lately, a number of headwinds have arisen, which seem to have shaken the faith of analysts and investors in the consumer discretionary sector. There are high-profile supply chain issues that continue to put pressure on this sector. Inflationary concerns continue to compress margins. And the evolving relationship between these two companies is another factor investors have to consider.</p><p>That said, there’s yet another headwind investors are pricing into both stocks today. Let’s dive into what investors are watching with Qualcomm.</p><p><b>Why Is QCOM Stock Plunging Today?</b></p><p>Today, JPMorgan’s Analyst Focus List, which has included the likes of Apple and Qualcomm for some time, has some big changes. Namely, the removal of these two tech juggernauts from the list has raised investor eyebrows.</p><p>JPMorgan analysts cited early warning signs of a reversal of consumer trending trends. Thus, expectations that end markets could see material weakness, recession or not, has led these analysts to “moderate [their] near-term bullishness for shares of Apple and Qualcomm.”</p><p>These adjusted expectations are certainly not a fringe view. Many investors view both Apple and Qualcomm as beneficiaries of the strong, consumer-driven economy we’ve seen over the past decade. The potential for the economy to turn over could materially affect both companies.</p><p>For long-term investors in Qualcomm, perhaps the removal from a key analyst watch list isn’t a big deal. After all, strong secular trends remain in place. However, a reversion of these trends, even over the medium term, is enough for many investors to look elsewhere today.</p></body></html>","source":"lsy1606302653667","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why Is Qualcomm Stock Down Today?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy Is Qualcomm Stock Down Today?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-04-02 10:28 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://investorplace.com/2022/04/why-is-qualcomm-qcom-stock-down-today/><strong>InvestorPlace</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Today, Apple and Qualcomm are both in the red, following an analyst update and a reversal of consumer discretionary trends. For QCOM stock specifically, a drop of 3.81% on Friday highlights just how ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://investorplace.com/2022/04/why-is-qualcomm-qcom-stock-down-today/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"QCOM":"高通"},"source_url":"https://investorplace.com/2022/04/why-is-qualcomm-qcom-stock-down-today/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1151157270","content_text":"Today, Apple and Qualcomm are both in the red, following an analyst update and a reversal of consumer discretionary trends. For QCOM stock specifically, a drop of 3.81% on Friday highlights just how bearish today’s price action has been for some top technology companies.Source: Xixi Fu / Shutterstock.comQualcomm and Apple have been joined at the hip for some time. That’s because Qualcomm is a major chip supplier for Apple’s phones. Accordingly, analysts tend to bucket the two together when looking at consumer spending trends within the smartphone space.Lately, a number of headwinds have arisen, which seem to have shaken the faith of analysts and investors in the consumer discretionary sector. There are high-profile supply chain issues that continue to put pressure on this sector. Inflationary concerns continue to compress margins. And the evolving relationship between these two companies is another factor investors have to consider.That said, there’s yet another headwind investors are pricing into both stocks today. Let’s dive into what investors are watching with Qualcomm.Why Is QCOM Stock Plunging Today?Today, JPMorgan’s Analyst Focus List, which has included the likes of Apple and Qualcomm for some time, has some big changes. Namely, the removal of these two tech juggernauts from the list has raised investor eyebrows.JPMorgan analysts cited early warning signs of a reversal of consumer trending trends. Thus, expectations that end markets could see material weakness, recession or not, has led these analysts to “moderate [their] near-term bullishness for shares of Apple and Qualcomm.”These adjusted expectations are certainly not a fringe view. Many investors view both Apple and Qualcomm as beneficiaries of the strong, consumer-driven economy we’ve seen over the past decade. The potential for the economy to turn over could materially affect both companies.For long-term investors in Qualcomm, perhaps the removal from a key analyst watch list isn’t a big deal. After all, strong secular trends remain in place. However, a reversion of these trends, even over the medium term, is enough for many investors to look elsewhere today.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":631,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9034969747,"gmtCreate":1647758453207,"gmtModify":1676534263851,"author":{"id":"3570855090477480","authorId":"3570855090477480","name":"Eden8018","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2a67ec57bfd274c18d983a2e0da58ded","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570855090477480","authorIdStr":"3570855090477480"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"When price dropped below 20 does any grab it","listText":"When price dropped below 20 does any grab it","text":"When price dropped below 20 does any grab it","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9034969747","repostId":"1121413470","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1121413470","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1647745257,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1121413470?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-03-20 11:00","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Can XPeng Stock Go Back Up To $50 Levels?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1121413470","media":"seekingalpha","summary":"SummaryXPeng's share price went above the $50 mark in late-November 2021 after it released better-th","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>Summary</b></p><ul><li>XPeng&#39;s share price went above the $50 mark in late-November 2021 after it released better-than-expected Q3 2021 results and Q4 2021 guidance.</li><li>But XPEV&#39;s shares have halved year-to-date in 2022, given the valuation de-rating for growth stocks, concerns regarding potential revenue misses for 2022, and delisting fears.</li><li>I rate XPeng as a Hold; I think the company&#39;s shares won&#39;t go back up to $50 levels in the short term.</li></ul><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fdedf526e99080369e7496ef684c9999\" tg-width=\"1536\" tg-height=\"1024\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>Robert Way/iStock Editorial via Getty Images</span></p><p><b>Elevator Pitch</b></p><p>I have a Hold investment rating for XPeng Inc. (NYSE:XPEV) [9868:HK]. My Neutral view on the stock is based on the premise that the company&#39;s shares aren&#39;t likely to rebound significantly (let alone return to $50 levels) in the near term. The negative headwinds hurting XPEV&#39;s shares such as investor style shift, supply chain disruptions for the Chinese automotive industry and concerns over the potential delisting of US-listed companies are likely to persist for a while. With its valuations reflecting most of the negatives after the sell-down in recent months, a Hold rating for XPeng is appropriate.</p><p><b>XPEV Stock Key Metrics</b></p><p>XPEV describes itself as &#34;a leading Chinese smart electric vehicle company that designs, develops, manufactures, and markets Smart EVs&#34; which targets &#34;technology-savvy middle-class consumers&#34; in its press releases. XPeng will report its Q4 2021 financial results on March 28, 2022, so I will review the company&#39;s most recent Q3 2021 financial metrics to see how the company has performed.</p><p>XPeng issued its Q3 2021 financial results media release on November 23, 2021 before the market opened, and this was well received by the market with XPEV&#39;s shares rising by +8% from $47.39 of November 22, 2021 to cross the $50 mark and close at $51.30 as of November 23, 2021. In the next week, XPeng&#39;s stock price gained further to reach a 52-week high of $56.45 on December 1, 2021, during intra-day trading.</p><p>The company&#39;s revenue expanded by +187% YoYin Q3 2021, and this was +9% better than what the market had anticipated. XPEV&#39;s vehicle deliveries almost tripled YoY from 8,578 units in Q3 2020 to 25,666 units in Q3 2021, and this exceeded the higher end of the company&#39;s earlier vehicle deliveries guidance of 23,000-25,000 units. Looking forward, XPeng expects to achieve vehicle deliveries of 35,500 units (mid-point of guidance) in the fourth quarter of 2021, which would be equivalent to a +174% YoY increase. XPEV also guided that its revenue should jump by +156% YoY to RMB7.3 billion (mid-point of guidance) in Q4 2021, which was +26% higher than the sell-side&#39;s consensus fourth-quarter top line estimate at the time of the Q3 earnings release.</p><p>But the good times did not last, as I highlight in the subsequent section.</p><p><b>Why Has XPeng Stock Dropped?</b></p><p>XPeng&#39;s stock price has fallen roughly by half since the start of the year. XPEV&#39;s shares fell from $50.27 as of January 3, 2022 (first trading day of the year) to $24.97 as of March 17, 2022.</p><p>In my opinion, there are three factors that have led to the severe decline in XPEV&#39;s share price.</p><p>Firstly, XPeng has suffered from a substantial valuation de-rating.</p><p>Investors have been rotating away from high (revenue) growth, loss-making stocks to profitable companies which are returning capital to shareholders via dividends or buybacks. This shift in investor preferences is aligned with expectations of rising interest rates in the future, which tend to be negative for high-growth companies.</p><p>Specifically, XPEV&#39;s consensus forward next twelve months&#39; Enterprise Value-to-Revenue multiple has compressed from above 8 times in late-November 2021 to 2.8 times as of March 17, 2022.</p><p>Secondly, there are concerns that the revenue growth and margins of Chinese electric vehicle companies like XPEV could disappoint the market in 2022.</p><p>Market consensus already expects XPeng&#39;s top line expansion to slow from +252% in fiscal 2021 to +97% in FY 2022. Besides a higher base for comparison in 2021, it is possible that supply chain disruptions could be a drag on Chinese electric vehicle sales in 2022. A recent March 11, 2021 <i>South China Morning Post</i> article highlighted that China Passenger Car Association&#39;s 5.5 million NEV (New Energy Vehicle) sales forecasts could be too bullish, as a researcher from North China University of Technology quoted in the article &#34;predicted that output of batteries and car chips may only be enough for 4.4 million NEVs this year.&#34;</p><p>Even if XPeng and its Chinese electric vehicle peers are able to secure sufficient semiconductor chips and batteries to meet market demand, it is likely to come at the expense of higher costs and wider losses. In other words, XPEV&#39;s 2022 year-to-date share price correction could be attributed to concerns of below-expectations financial results for the company this year.</p><p>Thirdly, worries about the potential risk of Chinese stocks delisting from the US might have hurt investor sentiment for XPEV as well.</p><p>XPeng&#39;s share price corrected from $28.65 as of March 9, 2022, to $19.75 as of March 14, 2022. This was linked to news of the SEC listing &#34;five China-based companies that could be delisted if they don&#39;t allow U.S. authorities to review company audits for three straight years&#34; as reported by <i>Seeking Alpha News</i> on March 11, 2022. XPEV&#39;s shares later rebounded strongly to close at $27.53 as of March 16, 2022, after <i>Xinhua News Agency</i> highlighted that &#34;the Chinese government continues to support various types of companies to list overseas.&#34; This seems to suggest that China will engage with the US on the topic of Chinese listings in the US and related audit issues.</p><p>XPEV is in a relatively better position than most other US-listed Chinese companies as its shares are already dual-listed in both the US and Hong Kong. But assuming that XPeng is eventually compelled to delist from the US market in a few years&#39; time, it is still a negative for the company&#39;s shares. The Hong Kong equity market or other stock markets for that matter are inferior to the US market in terms of liquidity and valuations. If XPEV ends up being solely listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange, the company loses an important channel for further financing, and its valuations might further de-rate to be in line with the broader Hong Kong market.</p><p>In the next section, I assess XPeng&#39;s stock price outlook.</p><p><b>Can XPEV Stock Rebound To $50?</b></p><p>It is challenging for XPeng&#39;s share price to recover back to $50. Based on my calculations, XPEV&#39;s consensus forward next twelve months&#39; Enterprise Value-to-Revenue multiple will have to expand to 6.6 times for its shares to be valued at $50.</p><p>I am of the view that a significant rebound for XPEV&#39;s shares in the near term driven by valuation multiple expansion is unlikely. As I explained in the prior section, a shift in investors&#39; preferences away from growth stocks, headwinds for the Chinese automotive industry at large, and delisting fears are going to cap XPeng&#39;s capital appreciation potential for now.</p><p>Furthermore, XPEV&#39;s current valuations are reasonable based on a peer comparison exercise.</p><p><b>Peer Valuation Comparison For XPEV</b></p><table><tbody><tr><td><b>Stock</b></td><td><b>Consensus Forward Next Twelve Months&#39; Enterprise Value-to-Revenue Multiple</b></td><td><b>Consensus Forward One Fiscal Year Gross Profit Margin</b></td><td><b>Consensus Forward Two Fiscal Year Gross Profit Margin</b></td><td><b>Consensus Forward One Fiscal Year Revenue Growth</b></td><td><b>Consensus Forward Two Fiscal Year Revenue Growth</b></td></tr><tr><td>XPeng</td><td><b>2.8</b></td><td><b>15.6%</b></td><td><b>17.9%</b></td><td><b>+97.2%</b></td><td><b>+58.3%</b></td></tr><tr><td>NIO Inc. (NIO)</td><td>3.5</td><td>19.7%</td><td>21.2%</td><td>+76.4%</td><td>+56.7%</td></tr><tr><td>Li Auto Inc. (LI)</td><td>2.4</td><td>21.6%</td><td>21.8%</td><td>+92.5%</td><td>+66.1%</td></tr></tbody></table><p>Source:<i>S&amp;P Capital IQ</i></p><p>XPeng&#39;s forward Enterprise Value-to-Revenue multiple is higher than LI, but lower than NIO. Although XPEV boasts slightly faster FY 2022 revenue growth rates as compared to its peers, its forecasted gross margin are the lowest in the peer group. As such, it is hard to argue that XPeng&#39;s shares are undervalued based on a peer valuation comparison.</p><p><b>Is XPEV Stock A Buy, Sell, Or Hold?</b></p><p>XPEV is a Hold. XPeng&#39;s valuations have already de-rated significantly, which prices the negatives to a considerable extent. On the other hand, the current headwinds that are a drag on its share price aren&#39;t likely to ease anytime soon.</p></body></html>","source":"lsy1642056764450","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Can XPeng Stock Go Back Up To $50 Levels?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nCan XPeng Stock Go Back Up To $50 Levels?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-03-20 11:00 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4496469-can-xpeng-stock-go-to-50-levels><strong>seekingalpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>SummaryXPeng's share price went above the $50 mark in late-November 2021 after it released better-than-expected Q3 2021 results and Q4 2021 guidance.But XPEV's shares have halved year-to-date in 2022,...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4496469-can-xpeng-stock-go-to-50-levels\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"XPEV":"小鹏汽车"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4496469-can-xpeng-stock-go-to-50-levels","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1121413470","content_text":"SummaryXPeng's share price went above the $50 mark in late-November 2021 after it released better-than-expected Q3 2021 results and Q4 2021 guidance.But XPEV's shares have halved year-to-date in 2022, given the valuation de-rating for growth stocks, concerns regarding potential revenue misses for 2022, and delisting fears.I rate XPeng as a Hold; I think the company's shares won't go back up to $50 levels in the short term.Robert Way/iStock Editorial via Getty ImagesElevator PitchI have a Hold investment rating for XPeng Inc. (NYSE:XPEV) [9868:HK]. My Neutral view on the stock is based on the premise that the company's shares aren't likely to rebound significantly (let alone return to $50 levels) in the near term. The negative headwinds hurting XPEV's shares such as investor style shift, supply chain disruptions for the Chinese automotive industry and concerns over the potential delisting of US-listed companies are likely to persist for a while. With its valuations reflecting most of the negatives after the sell-down in recent months, a Hold rating for XPeng is appropriate.XPEV Stock Key MetricsXPEV describes itself as \"a leading Chinese smart electric vehicle company that designs, develops, manufactures, and markets Smart EVs\" which targets \"technology-savvy middle-class consumers\" in its press releases. XPeng will report its Q4 2021 financial results on March 28, 2022, so I will review the company's most recent Q3 2021 financial metrics to see how the company has performed.XPeng issued its Q3 2021 financial results media release on November 23, 2021 before the market opened, and this was well received by the market with XPEV's shares rising by +8% from $47.39 of November 22, 2021 to cross the $50 mark and close at $51.30 as of November 23, 2021. In the next week, XPeng's stock price gained further to reach a 52-week high of $56.45 on December 1, 2021, during intra-day trading.The company's revenue expanded by +187% YoYin Q3 2021, and this was +9% better than what the market had anticipated. XPEV's vehicle deliveries almost tripled YoY from 8,578 units in Q3 2020 to 25,666 units in Q3 2021, and this exceeded the higher end of the company's earlier vehicle deliveries guidance of 23,000-25,000 units. Looking forward, XPeng expects to achieve vehicle deliveries of 35,500 units (mid-point of guidance) in the fourth quarter of 2021, which would be equivalent to a +174% YoY increase. XPEV also guided that its revenue should jump by +156% YoY to RMB7.3 billion (mid-point of guidance) in Q4 2021, which was +26% higher than the sell-side's consensus fourth-quarter top line estimate at the time of the Q3 earnings release.But the good times did not last, as I highlight in the subsequent section.Why Has XPeng Stock Dropped?XPeng's stock price has fallen roughly by half since the start of the year. XPEV's shares fell from $50.27 as of January 3, 2022 (first trading day of the year) to $24.97 as of March 17, 2022.In my opinion, there are three factors that have led to the severe decline in XPEV's share price.Firstly, XPeng has suffered from a substantial valuation de-rating.Investors have been rotating away from high (revenue) growth, loss-making stocks to profitable companies which are returning capital to shareholders via dividends or buybacks. This shift in investor preferences is aligned with expectations of rising interest rates in the future, which tend to be negative for high-growth companies.Specifically, XPEV's consensus forward next twelve months' Enterprise Value-to-Revenue multiple has compressed from above 8 times in late-November 2021 to 2.8 times as of March 17, 2022.Secondly, there are concerns that the revenue growth and margins of Chinese electric vehicle companies like XPEV could disappoint the market in 2022.Market consensus already expects XPeng's top line expansion to slow from +252% in fiscal 2021 to +97% in FY 2022. Besides a higher base for comparison in 2021, it is possible that supply chain disruptions could be a drag on Chinese electric vehicle sales in 2022. A recent March 11, 2021 South China Morning Post article highlighted that China Passenger Car Association's 5.5 million NEV (New Energy Vehicle) sales forecasts could be too bullish, as a researcher from North China University of Technology quoted in the article \"predicted that output of batteries and car chips may only be enough for 4.4 million NEVs this year.\"Even if XPeng and its Chinese electric vehicle peers are able to secure sufficient semiconductor chips and batteries to meet market demand, it is likely to come at the expense of higher costs and wider losses. In other words, XPEV's 2022 year-to-date share price correction could be attributed to concerns of below-expectations financial results for the company this year.Thirdly, worries about the potential risk of Chinese stocks delisting from the US might have hurt investor sentiment for XPEV as well.XPeng's share price corrected from $28.65 as of March 9, 2022, to $19.75 as of March 14, 2022. This was linked to news of the SEC listing \"five China-based companies that could be delisted if they don't allow U.S. authorities to review company audits for three straight years\" as reported by Seeking Alpha News on March 11, 2022. XPEV's shares later rebounded strongly to close at $27.53 as of March 16, 2022, after Xinhua News Agency highlighted that \"the Chinese government continues to support various types of companies to list overseas.\" This seems to suggest that China will engage with the US on the topic of Chinese listings in the US and related audit issues.XPEV is in a relatively better position than most other US-listed Chinese companies as its shares are already dual-listed in both the US and Hong Kong. But assuming that XPeng is eventually compelled to delist from the US market in a few years' time, it is still a negative for the company's shares. The Hong Kong equity market or other stock markets for that matter are inferior to the US market in terms of liquidity and valuations. If XPEV ends up being solely listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange, the company loses an important channel for further financing, and its valuations might further de-rate to be in line with the broader Hong Kong market.In the next section, I assess XPeng's stock price outlook.Can XPEV Stock Rebound To $50?It is challenging for XPeng's share price to recover back to $50. Based on my calculations, XPEV's consensus forward next twelve months' Enterprise Value-to-Revenue multiple will have to expand to 6.6 times for its shares to be valued at $50.I am of the view that a significant rebound for XPEV's shares in the near term driven by valuation multiple expansion is unlikely. As I explained in the prior section, a shift in investors' preferences away from growth stocks, headwinds for the Chinese automotive industry at large, and delisting fears are going to cap XPeng's capital appreciation potential for now.Furthermore, XPEV's current valuations are reasonable based on a peer comparison exercise.Peer Valuation Comparison For XPEVStockConsensus Forward Next Twelve Months' Enterprise Value-to-Revenue MultipleConsensus Forward One Fiscal Year Gross Profit MarginConsensus Forward Two Fiscal Year Gross Profit MarginConsensus Forward One Fiscal Year Revenue GrowthConsensus Forward Two Fiscal Year Revenue GrowthXPeng2.815.6%17.9%+97.2%+58.3%NIO Inc. (NIO)3.519.7%21.2%+76.4%+56.7%Li Auto Inc. (LI)2.421.6%21.8%+92.5%+66.1%Source:S&P Capital IQXPeng's forward Enterprise Value-to-Revenue multiple is higher than LI, but lower than NIO. Although XPEV boasts slightly faster FY 2022 revenue growth rates as compared to its peers, its forecasted gross margin are the lowest in the peer group. As such, it is hard to argue that XPeng's shares are undervalued based on a peer valuation comparison.Is XPEV Stock A Buy, Sell, Or Hold?XPEV is a Hold. XPeng's valuations have already de-rated significantly, which prices the negatives to a considerable extent. On the other hand, the current headwinds that are a drag on its share price aren't likely to ease anytime soon.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":151,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9015638544,"gmtCreate":1649470356881,"gmtModify":1676534517701,"author":{"id":"3570855090477480","authorId":"3570855090477480","name":"Eden8018","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2a67ec57bfd274c18d983a2e0da58ded","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570855090477480","authorIdStr":"3570855090477480"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"I think nobody going taking it was high valuenow.... course it really give investor a huge positive future.","listText":"I think nobody going taking it was high valuenow.... course it really give investor a huge positive future.","text":"I think nobody going taking it was high valuenow.... course it really give investor a huge positive future.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9015638544","repostId":"2225529120","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":793,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9001158505,"gmtCreate":1641199276929,"gmtModify":1676533581969,"author":{"id":"3570855090477480","authorId":"3570855090477480","name":"Eden8018","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2a67ec57bfd274c18d983a2e0da58ded","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570855090477480","authorIdStr":"3570855090477480"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Another drop because of China regulation","listText":"Another drop because of China regulation","text":"Another drop because of China regulation","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9001158505","repostId":"1154309326","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1154309326","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Stock Market Quotes, Business News, Financial News, Trading Ideas, and Stock Research by Professionals","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Benzinga","id":"1052270027","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa"},"pubTimestamp":1641170534,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1154309326?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-01-03 08:42","market":"us","language":"en","title":"China to Cut EV Subsidies By 30% In 2022: What That Means For Tesla, Nio, XPeng And Others","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1154309326","media":"Benzinga","summary":"China has confirmed subsidy reduction for new energy vehicles (NEV), beginning in 2022, and it is ea","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>China has confirmed subsidy reduction for new energy vehicles (NEV), beginning in 2022, and it is early to assess whether it will impact EV adoption in the hot-and-happening Chinese economy. NEVs include EVs, plug-in hybrids and hydrogen fuel-cell energy vehicles.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c7c6c88cc98e5c683282b444ec94922f\" tg-width=\"685\" tg-height=\"375\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p><b>What Happened:</b>China will slash NEV subsidies by 30% in the new year, the country&#39;s Ministry of Finance confirmed in a statement on its website. Subsidies will be withdrawn completely at the end of the year, the ministry added.</p><p>Subsidies for NEVs meant for public transport will be lowered by 20%. China has set a target of NEVs accounting for 20% of new vehicles sold by 2025.</p><p><b>Why It&#39;s Important:</b>In an anticipatory move,<b>Nio, Inc.</b> announced in early December if a customer preorders a vehicle with a deposit before midnight on Dec. 31, 2021 and takes delivery before March 31, 2022, it will absorb the difference between the old subsidy and the new subsidy, according to CnEVPost.</p><p>Nio can also benefit from another provision laid out by the government. China&#39;s NEV subsidy policy dictates that models with a pre-subsidy price of over 300,000 yuan ($47,200) are not eligible for subsidies, except those that support battery swapping, CnEVPost said in another report.</p><p>All of Nio&#39;s current models are priced above 300,000 yuan before subsidies, although the EV maker is speculated to be working on a mass market model under a different brand name.The company reportedly does not set different subsidies for different models, but rather base them on the model&#39;s battery pack.</p><p>Individual consumers are eligible to receive a subsidy of 11,340 yuan for a model with a standard 75 kilowatt-hour battery pack, and 12,600 yuan for a 100 kWh battery pack, the report said, citing the company&#39;s latest subsidy package. Companies purchasing a Nio vehicle get 70% of the amount available to individual consumers, according to the report.</p><p>Nio&#39;s domestic rival <b>XPeng, Inc.</b> is also looking to scale back purchase benefits to customers by about half, keeping in mind the subsidy cut, CnEVPost reported, citing local media outlet Auto-time. This is applicable to all theXPeng&#39;sthree models currently on the market, namely the G3i, P5 and P7.</p><p><b>Tesla, Inc.</b>, meanwhile, is continuing with a price hike spree amid the subsidy cut taking effect in China.</p><p>Tesla announced Friday it is raising prices of its made-in-China, or MIC, Model 3 vehicles to 265,652 yuan after subsidy, up 10,000 yuan or 3.9%, according to South China Morning Post. As A As recently as late November, the company instituted a price increase of 4,752 yuan.</p><p>The price of the Model Y SUV was also hiked by 7.5% to 301,840 yuan, the report added. The SUV will no longer qualify for subsidies.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>China to Cut EV Subsidies By 30% In 2022: What That Means For Tesla, Nio, XPeng And Others</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nChina to Cut EV Subsidies By 30% In 2022: What That Means For Tesla, Nio, XPeng And Others\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Benzinga </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-01-03 08:42</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>China has confirmed subsidy reduction for new energy vehicles (NEV), beginning in 2022, and it is early to assess whether it will impact EV adoption in the hot-and-happening Chinese economy. NEVs include EVs, plug-in hybrids and hydrogen fuel-cell energy vehicles.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c7c6c88cc98e5c683282b444ec94922f\" tg-width=\"685\" tg-height=\"375\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p><b>What Happened:</b>China will slash NEV subsidies by 30% in the new year, the country&#39;s Ministry of Finance confirmed in a statement on its website. Subsidies will be withdrawn completely at the end of the year, the ministry added.</p><p>Subsidies for NEVs meant for public transport will be lowered by 20%. China has set a target of NEVs accounting for 20% of new vehicles sold by 2025.</p><p><b>Why It&#39;s Important:</b>In an anticipatory move,<b>Nio, Inc.</b> announced in early December if a customer preorders a vehicle with a deposit before midnight on Dec. 31, 2021 and takes delivery before March 31, 2022, it will absorb the difference between the old subsidy and the new subsidy, according to CnEVPost.</p><p>Nio can also benefit from another provision laid out by the government. China&#39;s NEV subsidy policy dictates that models with a pre-subsidy price of over 300,000 yuan ($47,200) are not eligible for subsidies, except those that support battery swapping, CnEVPost said in another report.</p><p>All of Nio&#39;s current models are priced above 300,000 yuan before subsidies, although the EV maker is speculated to be working on a mass market model under a different brand name.The company reportedly does not set different subsidies for different models, but rather base them on the model&#39;s battery pack.</p><p>Individual consumers are eligible to receive a subsidy of 11,340 yuan for a model with a standard 75 kilowatt-hour battery pack, and 12,600 yuan for a 100 kWh battery pack, the report said, citing the company&#39;s latest subsidy package. Companies purchasing a Nio vehicle get 70% of the amount available to individual consumers, according to the report.</p><p>Nio&#39;s domestic rival <b>XPeng, Inc.</b> is also looking to scale back purchase benefits to customers by about half, keeping in mind the subsidy cut, CnEVPost reported, citing local media outlet Auto-time. This is applicable to all theXPeng&#39;sthree models currently on the market, namely the G3i, P5 and P7.</p><p><b>Tesla, Inc.</b>, meanwhile, is continuing with a price hike spree amid the subsidy cut taking effect in China.</p><p>Tesla announced Friday it is raising prices of its made-in-China, or MIC, Model 3 vehicles to 265,652 yuan after subsidy, up 10,000 yuan or 3.9%, according to South China Morning Post. As A As recently as late November, the company instituted a price increase of 4,752 yuan.</p><p>The price of the Model Y SUV was also hiked by 7.5% to 301,840 yuan, the report added. The SUV will no longer qualify for subsidies.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NIO":"蔚来","TSLA":"特斯拉","XPEV":"小鹏汽车","LI":"理想汽车"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1154309326","content_text":"China has confirmed subsidy reduction for new energy vehicles (NEV), beginning in 2022, and it is early to assess whether it will impact EV adoption in the hot-and-happening Chinese economy. NEVs include EVs, plug-in hybrids and hydrogen fuel-cell energy vehicles.What Happened:China will slash NEV subsidies by 30% in the new year, the country's Ministry of Finance confirmed in a statement on its website. Subsidies will be withdrawn completely at the end of the year, the ministry added.Subsidies for NEVs meant for public transport will be lowered by 20%. China has set a target of NEVs accounting for 20% of new vehicles sold by 2025.Why It's Important:In an anticipatory move,Nio, Inc. announced in early December if a customer preorders a vehicle with a deposit before midnight on Dec. 31, 2021 and takes delivery before March 31, 2022, it will absorb the difference between the old subsidy and the new subsidy, according to CnEVPost.Nio can also benefit from another provision laid out by the government. China's NEV subsidy policy dictates that models with a pre-subsidy price of over 300,000 yuan ($47,200) are not eligible for subsidies, except those that support battery swapping, CnEVPost said in another report.All of Nio's current models are priced above 300,000 yuan before subsidies, although the EV maker is speculated to be working on a mass market model under a different brand name.The company reportedly does not set different subsidies for different models, but rather base them on the model's battery pack.Individual consumers are eligible to receive a subsidy of 11,340 yuan for a model with a standard 75 kilowatt-hour battery pack, and 12,600 yuan for a 100 kWh battery pack, the report said, citing the company's latest subsidy package. Companies purchasing a Nio vehicle get 70% of the amount available to individual consumers, according to the report.Nio's domestic rival XPeng, Inc. is also looking to scale back purchase benefits to customers by about half, keeping in mind the subsidy cut, CnEVPost reported, citing local media outlet Auto-time. This is applicable to all theXPeng'sthree models currently on the market, namely the G3i, P5 and P7.Tesla, Inc., meanwhile, is continuing with a price hike spree amid the subsidy cut taking effect in China.Tesla announced Friday it is raising prices of its made-in-China, or MIC, Model 3 vehicles to 265,652 yuan after subsidy, up 10,000 yuan or 3.9%, according to South China Morning Post. As A As recently as late November, the company instituted a price increase of 4,752 yuan.The price of the Model Y SUV was also hiked by 7.5% to 301,840 yuan, the report added. The SUV will no longer qualify for subsidies.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":420,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":158569137,"gmtCreate":1625156488029,"gmtModify":1703737442129,"author":{"id":"3570855090477480","authorId":"3570855090477480","name":"Eden8018","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2a67ec57bfd274c18d983a2e0da58ded","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570855090477480","authorIdStr":"3570855090477480"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Let wait market crash","listText":"Let wait market crash","text":"Let wait market crash","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/158569137","repostId":"1199212665","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":444,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9016827804,"gmtCreate":1649169265499,"gmtModify":1676534462722,"author":{"id":"3570855090477480","authorId":"3570855090477480","name":"Eden8018","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2a67ec57bfd274c18d983a2e0da58ded","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570855090477480","authorIdStr":"3570855090477480"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Too many uncertainty but great to hold if got stronger holding power","listText":"Too many uncertainty but great to hold if got stronger holding power","text":"Too many uncertainty but great to hold if got stronger holding power","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9016827804","repostId":"1154558214","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1031,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9081927676,"gmtCreate":1650184258469,"gmtModify":1676534665397,"author":{"id":"3570855090477480","authorId":"3570855090477480","name":"Eden8018","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2a67ec57bfd274c18d983a2e0da58ded","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570855090477480","authorIdStr":"3570855090477480"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/RBLX\">$Roblox Corporation(RBLX)$</a>Did people doesnt like them anymore?","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/RBLX\">$Roblox Corporation(RBLX)$</a>Did people doesnt like them anymore?","text":"$Roblox Corporation(RBLX)$Did people doesnt like them anymore?","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/2b339dd599589deeb8c459531efc998f","width":"1125","height":"3588"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9081927676","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":596,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9018389114,"gmtCreate":1648973329842,"gmtModify":1676534430793,"author":{"id":"3570855090477480","authorId":"3570855090477480","name":"Eden8018","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2a67ec57bfd274c18d983a2e0da58ded","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570855090477480","authorIdStr":"3570855090477480"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"All blue chip company being investigate&nbsp;","listText":"All blue chip company being investigate&nbsp;","text":"All blue chip company being investigate","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9018389114","repostId":"2224340564","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2224340564","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1648863342,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2224340564?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-04-02 09:35","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Microsoft's Cloud Business Targeted by EU Antitrust Regulators","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2224340564","media":"Reuters","summary":"(Reuters) - EU antitrust regulators are quizzing Microsoft's rivals and customers about its cloud bu","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>(Reuters) - EU antitrust regulators are quizzing Microsoft&#39;s rivals and customers about its cloud business and licensing deals, a  questionnaire seen by Reuters showed, in a move that could lead to a formal investigation and renewed scrutiny of the U.S. software company.</p><p>The European Commission has fined Microsoft a total 1.6 billion euros ($1.8 billion) in the previous decade for breaching EU antitrust rules and for not complying with its order to halt anti-competitive practices.</p><p>The company found itself on the EU competition enforcer&#39;s radar again after German software provider NextCloud, France&#39;s OVHcloud    and two other companies filed complaints about Microsoft&#39;s cloud practices.</p><p>&#34;The Commission has information that Microsoft may be using its potentially dominant position in certain software markets to foreclose competition regarding certain cloud computing services,&#34; the questionnaire said.</p><p>Regulators asked if the terms in Microsoft&#39;s licensing deals with cloud service providers allow rivals to compete effectively.</p><p>They also want to know if companies needed Microsoft&#39;s operating systems and productivity applications to complement their own cloud infrastructure offering in order to compete effectively.</p><p>Companies also were asked about the differences in license fees and commercial terms between the licensing deals with cloud service providers and another programme in which they package and  indirectly resell Microsoft&#39;s cloud services together with their own.</p><p>Another focus was potential technical limitations on cloud storage services available on companies&#39; cloud infrastructure.</p><p>&#34;We&#39;re continuously evaluating how we can best support partners and make Microsoft software available to customers across all environments, including those of other cloud providers,&#34; Microsoft said in an emailed statement.</p><p>EU antitrust chief Margrethe Vestager earlier this week said she has no concerns yet about cloud computing and cited the competition from Europe&#39;s Gaia-X initiative.</p><p>($1 = 0.9060 euros)</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Microsoft's Cloud Business Targeted by EU Antitrust Regulators</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nMicrosoft's Cloud Business Targeted by EU Antitrust Regulators\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-04-02 09:35</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>(Reuters) - EU antitrust regulators are quizzing Microsoft&#39;s rivals and customers about its cloud business and licensing deals, a  questionnaire seen by Reuters showed, in a move that could lead to a formal investigation and renewed scrutiny of the U.S. software company.</p><p>The European Commission has fined Microsoft a total 1.6 billion euros ($1.8 billion) in the previous decade for breaching EU antitrust rules and for not complying with its order to halt anti-competitive practices.</p><p>The company found itself on the EU competition enforcer&#39;s radar again after German software provider NextCloud, France&#39;s OVHcloud    and two other companies filed complaints about Microsoft&#39;s cloud practices.</p><p>&#34;The Commission has information that Microsoft may be using its potentially dominant position in certain software markets to foreclose competition regarding certain cloud computing services,&#34; the questionnaire said.</p><p>Regulators asked if the terms in Microsoft&#39;s licensing deals with cloud service providers allow rivals to compete effectively.</p><p>They also want to know if companies needed Microsoft&#39;s operating systems and productivity applications to complement their own cloud infrastructure offering in order to compete effectively.</p><p>Companies also were asked about the differences in license fees and commercial terms between the licensing deals with cloud service providers and another programme in which they package and  indirectly resell Microsoft&#39;s cloud services together with their own.</p><p>Another focus was potential technical limitations on cloud storage services available on companies&#39; cloud infrastructure.</p><p>&#34;We&#39;re continuously evaluating how we can best support partners and make Microsoft software available to customers across all environments, including those of other cloud providers,&#34; Microsoft said in an emailed statement.</p><p>EU antitrust chief Margrethe Vestager earlier this week said she has no concerns yet about cloud computing and cited the competition from Europe&#39;s Gaia-X initiative.</p><p>($1 = 0.9060 euros)</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BK4548":"巴美列捷福持仓","BK4504":"桥水持仓","BK4516":"特朗普概念","BK4097":"系统软件","BK4503":"景林资产持仓","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓","BK4576":"AR","BK4538":"云计算","BK4527":"明星科技股","BK4535":"淡马锡持仓","BK4566":"资本集团","BK4525":"远程办公概念","BK4577":"网络游戏","MSFT":"微软","BK4579":"人工智能","BK4533":"AQR资本管理(全球第二大对冲基金)","BK4567":"ESG概念","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","BK4532":"文艺复兴科技持仓","BK4554":"元宇宙及AR概念","BK4528":"SaaS概念","BK4581":"高盛持仓"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2224340564","content_text":"(Reuters) - EU antitrust regulators are quizzing Microsoft's rivals and customers about its cloud business and licensing deals, a  questionnaire seen by Reuters showed, in a move that could lead to a formal investigation and renewed scrutiny of the U.S. software company.The European Commission has fined Microsoft a total 1.6 billion euros ($1.8 billion) in the previous decade for breaching EU antitrust rules and for not complying with its order to halt anti-competitive practices.The company found itself on the EU competition enforcer's radar again after German software provider NextCloud, France's OVHcloud    and two other companies filed complaints about Microsoft's cloud practices.\"The Commission has information that Microsoft may be using its potentially dominant position in certain software markets to foreclose competition regarding certain cloud computing services,\" the questionnaire said.Regulators asked if the terms in Microsoft's licensing deals with cloud service providers allow rivals to compete effectively.They also want to know if companies needed Microsoft's operating systems and productivity applications to complement their own cloud infrastructure offering in order to compete effectively.Companies also were asked about the differences in license fees and commercial terms between the licensing deals with cloud service providers and another programme in which they package and  indirectly resell Microsoft's cloud services together with their own.Another focus was potential technical limitations on cloud storage services available on companies' cloud infrastructure.\"We're continuously evaluating how we can best support partners and make Microsoft software available to customers across all environments, including those of other cloud providers,\" Microsoft said in an emailed statement.EU antitrust chief Margrethe Vestager earlier this week said she has no concerns yet about cloud computing and cited the competition from Europe's Gaia-X initiative.($1 = 0.9060 euros)","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":730,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9011372508,"gmtCreate":1648823526595,"gmtModify":1676534405471,"author":{"id":"3570855090477480","authorId":"3570855090477480","name":"Eden8018","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2a67ec57bfd274c18d983a2e0da58ded","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570855090477480","authorIdStr":"3570855090477480"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Can be a good opportunity but need stronger holding power&nbsp;","listText":"Can be a good opportunity but need stronger holding power&nbsp;","text":"Can be a good opportunity but need stronger holding power","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9011372508","repostId":"1153497658","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1153497658","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1648820371,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1153497658?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-04-01 21:39","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Hot Chinese ADRs Soared in Morning Trading","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1153497658","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Hot chinese ADRs soared in morning trading. Alibaba, Pinduoduo, JD.com, NetEase, Baidu, Bilibili, iQ","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Hot chinese ADRs soared in morning trading. Alibaba, Pinduoduo, JD.com, NetEase, Baidu, Bilibili, iQIYI, DiDi, Nio, Xpeng and Li Auto climbed between 5% and 25%.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/39f2467210e6392b898cd3ec6cfa006f\" tg-width=\"410\" tg-height=\"722\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p></p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Hot Chinese ADRs Soared in Morning Trading</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHot Chinese ADRs Soared in Morning Trading\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-04-01 21:39</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>Hot chinese ADRs soared in morning trading. Alibaba, Pinduoduo, JD.com, NetEase, Baidu, Bilibili, iQIYI, DiDi, Nio, Xpeng and Li Auto climbed between 5% and 25%.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/39f2467210e6392b898cd3ec6cfa006f\" tg-width=\"410\" tg-height=\"722\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p></p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BABA":"阿里巴巴"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1153497658","content_text":"Hot chinese ADRs soared in morning trading. Alibaba, Pinduoduo, JD.com, NetEase, Baidu, Bilibili, iQIYI, DiDi, Nio, Xpeng and Li Auto climbed between 5% and 25%.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":690,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9033732395,"gmtCreate":1646356057282,"gmtModify":1676534121350,"author":{"id":"3570855090477480","authorId":"3570855090477480","name":"Eden8018","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2a67ec57bfd274c18d983a2e0da58ded","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570855090477480","authorIdStr":"3570855090477480"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ppl we always forget we living in the same planet 🥺","listText":"Ppl we always forget we living in the same planet 🥺","text":"Ppl we always forget we living in the same planet 🥺","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9033732395","repostId":"2216432147","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":401,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9033263992,"gmtCreate":1646286520640,"gmtModify":1676534113108,"author":{"id":"3570855090477480","authorId":"3570855090477480","name":"Eden8018","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2a67ec57bfd274c18d983a2e0da58ded","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570855090477480","authorIdStr":"3570855090477480"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Another challenging of the year&nbsp;","listText":"Another challenging of the year&nbsp;","text":"Another challenging of the year","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9033263992","repostId":"1149870762","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":424,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":892176528,"gmtCreate":1628646060564,"gmtModify":1676529807171,"author":{"id":"3570855090477480","authorId":"3570855090477480","name":"Eden8018","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2a67ec57bfd274c18d983a2e0da58ded","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570855090477480","authorIdStr":"3570855090477480"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Great&nbsp;","listText":"Great&nbsp;","text":"Great","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a920feb97a3dd20467616d4b59f7fd1e","width":"1125","height":"3496"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/892176528","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":697,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":802047469,"gmtCreate":1627702425951,"gmtModify":1703494972127,"author":{"id":"3570855090477480","authorId":"3570855090477480","name":"Eden8018","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2a67ec57bfd274c18d983a2e0da58ded","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570855090477480","authorIdStr":"3570855090477480"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good move all way up","listText":"Good move all way up","text":"Good move all way up","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/10d642b3176ea30a2c546f827cbe1646","width":"1125","height":"3406"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/802047469","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":311,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9036573252,"gmtCreate":1647155068735,"gmtModify":1676534199571,"author":{"id":"3570855090477480","authorId":"3570855090477480","name":"Eden8018","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2a67ec57bfd274c18d983a2e0da58ded","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570855090477480","authorIdStr":"3570855090477480"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"New opportunity ?","listText":"New opportunity ?","text":"New opportunity ?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9036573252","repostId":"1115884948","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":487,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":175311398,"gmtCreate":1627006599514,"gmtModify":1703482305706,"author":{"id":"3570855090477480","authorId":"3570855090477480","name":"Eden8018","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2a67ec57bfd274c18d983a2e0da58ded","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570855090477480","authorIdStr":"3570855090477480"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Another chance to push up?","listText":"Another chance to push up?","text":"Another chance to push up?","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b0c8e9bc0b6754e55d848eaa4efe8035","width":"1125","height":"3495"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/175311398","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":489,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9089760923,"gmtCreate":1650034790376,"gmtModify":1676534633432,"author":{"id":"3570855090477480","authorId":"3570855090477480","name":"Eden8018","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2a67ec57bfd274c18d983a2e0da58ded","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570855090477480","authorIdStr":"3570855090477480"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/BABA\">$Alibaba(BABA)$</a>Still need long way back tohome","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/BABA\">$Alibaba(BABA)$</a>Still need long way back tohome","text":"$Alibaba(BABA)$Still need long way back tohome","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/ec2a9da9780b0c903ce52fb476cc35df","width":"1125","height":"3816"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9089760923","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":802,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9080013976,"gmtCreate":1649817561468,"gmtModify":1676534583282,"author":{"id":"3570855090477480","authorId":"3570855090477480","name":"Eden8018","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2a67ec57bfd274c18d983a2e0da58ded","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570855090477480","authorIdStr":"3570855090477480"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"We are at same tower .... but I was at 11 flr[Facepalm]&nbsp;","listText":"We are at same tower .... but I was at 11 flr[Facepalm]&nbsp;","text":"We are at same tower .... but I was at 11 flr[Facepalm]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9080013976","repostId":"9017223685","repostType":1,"repost":{"id":9017223685,"gmtCreate":1649779261847,"gmtModify":1676534573950,"author":{"id":"3582028189369150","authorId":"3582028189369150","name":"H0KIT","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3582028189369150","authorIdStr":"3582028189369150"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/SKLZ\">$Skillz Inc(SKLZ)$</a>when is it coming back?","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/SKLZ\">$Skillz Inc(SKLZ)$</a>when is it coming back?","text":"$Skillz Inc(SKLZ)$when is it coming back?","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/273d47beba4a533e7ec827ed3e244970","width":"1080","height":"1920"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9017223685","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":0,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":352,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9016102775,"gmtCreate":1649138665421,"gmtModify":1676534458219,"author":{"id":"3570855090477480","authorId":"3570855090477480","name":"Eden8018","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2a67ec57bfd274c18d983a2e0da58ded","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570855090477480","authorIdStr":"3570855090477480"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Although border open but profit could be effect by russia Ukraine war?[Speechless]&nbsp;","listText":"Although border open but profit could be effect by russia Ukraine war?[Speechless]&nbsp;","text":"Although border open but profit could be effect by russia Ukraine war?[Speechless]","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/aee61549f83feaffdf91c9547895a6a0","width":"1125","height":"2985"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9016102775","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":588,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9013894207,"gmtCreate":1648698478357,"gmtModify":1676534382335,"author":{"id":"3570855090477480","authorId":"3570855090477480","name":"Eden8018","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2a67ec57bfd274c18d983a2e0da58ded","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570855090477480","authorIdStr":"3570855090477480"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/COIN\">$Coinbase Global, Inc.(COIN)$</a>Could it break another&nbsp;new high record?","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/COIN\">$Coinbase Global, Inc.(COIN)$</a>Could it break another&nbsp;new high record?","text":"$Coinbase Global, Inc.(COIN)$Could it break another new high record?","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/7b627db305921a745efb297f84901463","width":"1125","height":"3588"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9013894207","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":604,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}