Thunderbird personal page - To The Moon

Thunderbird

Thunderbird

No personal profile

53Follow

5Followers

0Topic

0Badge

2022-10-03

Not sure if I dare to buy now

Alibaba Stock: Attractive Valuation Despite Mid-Term Headwinds

2022-10-01

All are dropping

4 Blue-Chip Stocks to Sell in October

2022-09-13

That we know. We are more concern if the cpi is above or below 8.1%. Anyone can tell me?

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2022-08-26

More liquidity, why not?

Is Tesla's Stock Split Good For Investors?

2022-08-26

The rally is going to continue! No thanks for this.

Worried About the End of the Summer Rally? Inverse ETFs to Tap

2022-08-23

Not buying anything in this market.

3 Stocks to Avoid This Week

2022-08-22

Ok

Jackson Hole, Inflation, Dollar Stores: What to Know This Week in Markets

2022-08-22

Agree!

No, There Is No New Short-Selling Champion in Tesla Stock

2022-08-20

Even Elon musk is selling Tesla, is there somethingwe don't know?

Own Tesla Stock? You'll Have More Shares After the Stock Split

2022-08-20

Thanks for sharing

@amroui:$NVTS 20220916 7.5 PUT$ market downtrend saving me now haha.. wonder if I should cut loss or hold out to break even (or maybe even profit?) [Thinking] [Sly] $Navitas Semiconductor Corp(NVTS)$ postedsome solid news during its recent earnings. Can't believe it's only been 4 days. Feels like a long time ago. Doesn't look like it'll go back below $6.. i'd buy to hold if it does go back down that low haha [Happy]

2022-08-19

Another rate hike coming! 0.75!

Fed's Bullard Leans Toward Favoring 0.75-Percentage-Point September Rate Rise

2022-08-18

Rate is quite high now already. Dun need to slow, just stop.

Fed Officials Saw Need to Slow Rate-Hike Pace “At Some Point”

2022-08-18

Thanks for sharing

The Pros And Cons Of Investing In Tesla Stock

2022-08-17

Let see what this bill does

Biden Signs Inflation Reduction Act Into Law

2022-08-16

Please like :)

What Are Single Stock & Bond ETFs? Should You Consider Buying Them

2022-08-16

Climate change is REAL!

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2022-08-15

Ok

Options Trading Strategies: 5 Strategies for Beginners

2022-08-14

It will come back

Stock Market Recovery Faces a New Hurdle as Record Buybacks Slow

2022-08-14

Hope the sept cpi is below expectations too

Inflation Surge Cools in July. Should You Still Play Defense with Your Portfolio?

2022-08-13

Let's cheer too!

Why Stock Market Bulls Are Cheering the S&P 500’s Close above 4,231

Go to Tiger App to see more news

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"userPageInfo":{"id":"3574915362300502","uuid":"3574915362300502","gmtCreate":1611821338662,"gmtModify":1623765469068,"name":"Thunderbird","pinyin":"thunderbird","introduction":"","introductionEn":"","signature":"","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/86528f4fb847fbbf69680f5b0c603119","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":5,"headSize":53,"tweetSize":74,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":1,"name":"萌萌虎","nameTw":"萌萌虎","represent":"呱呱坠地","factor":"评论帖子3次或发布1条主帖（非转发）","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":"success","userBadges":[{"badgeId":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493-2","templateUuid":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493","name":"Senior Tiger","description":"Join the tiger community for 1000 days","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0063fb68ea29c9ae6858c58630e182d5","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/96c699a93be4214d4b49aea6a5a5d1a4","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/35b0e542a9ff77046ed69ef602bc105d","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.10.26","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"44212b71d0be4ec88898348dbe882e03-2","templateUuid":"44212b71d0be4ec88898348dbe882e03","name":"Executive Tiger","description":"The transaction amount of the securities account reaches $300,000","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9d20b23f1b6335407f882bc5c2ad12c0","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ada3b4533518ace8404a3f6dd192bd29","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/177f283ba21d1c077054dac07f88f3bd","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.07.14","exceedPercentage":"80.96%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1101},{"badgeId":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be-2","templateUuid":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be","name":"Master Trader","description":"Total number of securities or futures transactions reached 100","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ad22cfbe2d05aa393b18e9226e4b0307","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/36702e6ff3ffe46acafee66cc85273ca","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d52eb88fa385cf5abe2616ed63781765","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2022.04.06","exceedPercentage":"80.13%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100},{"badgeId":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84-1","templateUuid":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84","name":"Real Trader","description":"Completed a transaction","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":4,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":null,"starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"post","tweets":[{"id":9912936278,"gmtCreate":1664731543894,"gmtModify":1676537499128,"author":{"id":"3574915362300502","authorId":"3574915362300502","name":"Thunderbird","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/86528f4fb847fbbf69680f5b0c603119","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574915362300502","authorIdStr":"3574915362300502"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Not sure if I dare to buy now","listText":"Not sure if I dare to buy now","text":"Not sure if I dare to buy now","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":8,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9912936278","repostId":"1157459217","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1157459217","pubTimestamp":1664676789,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1157459217?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-10-02 10:13","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Alibaba Stock: Attractive Valuation Despite Mid-Term Headwinds","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1157459217","media":"TipRanks","summary":"Over the mid term,Alibaba’s share price has had a habit of moving in step with earnings revisions but during the past 3 months, this relationship has weakened.During the period, Alibaba’s forecast for adj EPS in FY2024 has been cut by 4%, yet the share price has dropped by 34%.Moving forward, how can this be corrected?","content":"<div>\n<p>Over the mid term, Alibaba’s (BABA)share price has had a habit of moving in step with earnings revisions but during the past 3 months, this relationship has weakened.During the period, Alibaba’s ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.tipranks.com/news/article/alibaba-stock-attractive-valuation-despite-mid-term-headwinds\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"lsy1606183248679","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Alibaba Stock: Attractive Valuation Despite Mid-Term Headwinds</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAlibaba Stock: Attractive Valuation Despite Mid-Term Headwinds\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-10-02 10:13 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.tipranks.com/news/article/alibaba-stock-attractive-valuation-despite-mid-term-headwinds><strong>TipRanks</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Over the mid term, Alibaba’s (BABA)share price has had a habit of moving in step with earnings revisions but during the past 3 months, this relationship has weakened.During the period, Alibaba’s ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.tipranks.com/news/article/alibaba-stock-attractive-valuation-despite-mid-term-headwinds\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"09988":"阿里巴巴-W","BABA":"阿里巴巴"},"source_url":"https://www.tipranks.com/news/article/alibaba-stock-attractive-valuation-despite-mid-term-headwinds","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1157459217","content_text":"Over the mid term, Alibaba’s (BABA)share price has had a habit of moving in step with earnings revisions but during the past 3 months, this relationship has weakened.During the period, Alibaba’s forecast for adj EPS in FY2024 has been cut by 4%, yet the share price has dropped by 34%.Moving forward, how can this be corrected? J.P. Morgan’sAlex Yao has an idea. The analyst believes “sentiment-driven fund flow is the current key share price driver and revenue recovery is the key determinant of market sentiment.”That is a bit of problem, then. Because Yao expects weak China consumption in the September quarter (F2Q23) to impact the revenue outlook.Since late August, Covid has once again been a disruptive force in a host of cities across China, and as such, Yao expects “limited improvement” in Alibaba’s core-core CMR (customer-management revenue) compared to the June quarter.The analyst sees the September quarter’s CMR falling by 4% from the same period last year, hardly any better than the June quarter’s 5% drop. On account of “low visibility of consumer sentiment improvement” or any relaxion of the Covid policies, the decline will continue in the December quarter, albeit at a slower pace (Yao expects a 2% year-over-year decline vs. anticipation of a positive turn previously).In contrast, given Alibaba’s firm commitment to cost-cutting and efficiency-improving measures, Yao sees “potential upside to consensus bottom-line projections.”However, that might not have enough of a positive effect right now. “Alibaba’s weakening revenue outlook in the near term could continue to weigh on the share price despite an unchanged, or even potentially better, profit outlook,” the analyst said, before summing up, “Nonetheless, we believe Alibaba’s share price is attractive on a 12-month view on 1) profit growth recovery to 20%+ in FY2024, 2) current consensus FY2024 PE of only 9x.”To this end, Yao rates BABA shares an Overweight (i.e., Buy) along with a $135 price target. This figure leaves room for 12-month share appreciation of ~69%. Yao’s rating stays an Overweight (i.e., Buy).Overall, Wall Street takes a bullish stance on Alibaba shares. 17 Buys and 1 Sell issued over the previous three months, making the stock a Strong Buy. Meanwhile, the $149.06 average price target suggests ~86% upside from current levels.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":486,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9916257067,"gmtCreate":1664608581660,"gmtModify":1676537484818,"author":{"id":"3574915362300502","authorId":"3574915362300502","name":"Thunderbird","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/86528f4fb847fbbf69680f5b0c603119","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574915362300502","authorIdStr":"3574915362300502"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"All are dropping&nbsp;","listText":"All are dropping&nbsp;","text":"All are dropping","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9916257067","repostId":"1133444550","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1133444550","pubTimestamp":1664595772,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1133444550?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-10-01 11:42","market":"us","language":"en","title":"4 Blue-Chip Stocks to Sell in October","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1133444550","media":"InvestorPlace","summary":"These blue-chip stocks to sell face macroeconomic and/or company-specific headwinds.PepsiCo(PEP): Valuations look stretched, especially with growth likely to slow.Costco Wholesale(COST): A correction ","content":"<html><head></head><body><ul><li>These blue-chip stocks to sell face macroeconomic and/or company-specific headwinds.</li><li><b>PepsiCo</b>(<b><u>PEP</u></b>): Valuations look stretched, especially with growth likely to slow.</li><li><b>Costco Wholesale</b>(<b><u>COST</u></b>): A correction would provide a much better entry point.</li><li><b>Freeport-McMoRan</b>(<b><u>FCX</u></b>): Now doesn&#39;t look like the ideal time to bet on copper.</li><li><b>Occidental Petroleum</b>(<b><u>OXY</u></b>): You may not be as comfortable as Warren Buffett riding out a correction.</li></ul><p>In general, when markets trend lower, it makes sense to invest in blue-chip stocks. They tend to have a low beta and also provide regular cash flows through dividends. Yet, not all blue chips are created equal. Based on macroeconomic or company-specific factors, there are some you want to buy and some blue-chip stocks to sell.</p><p>For example, blue-chip retailer <b>Target</b> (NYSE:<b><u>TGT</u></b>) sits 45% below its 52-week high, weighed down by inflationary pressures and margin compression. And pharmaceutical giant <b>Pfizer</b>(NYSE:<b><u>PFE</u></b>) is 30% below its high on concerns of a slowdown in growth predominately due to lower Covid-19 vaccine sales.</p><p>So, investors need to carry out due diligence even with blue chips. Today’s list of blue-chip stocks to sell in October contains popular names that are likely to correct or correct even further.</p><p><b>PepsiCo (PEP)</b></p><p><b>PepsiCo</b>(NASDAQ:<b><u>PEP</u></b>) stock is up 11% over the past year, bucking the broader bear market, and it throws off a healthy 2.7% dividend yield. However, shares look expensive with a forward price-earnings ratio of 22.8.</p><p>PepsiCo is likely to see decelerating growth or margin pressure in the coming quarters. The company is reportedly considering cost-cutting measures, including layoffs and buyouts for some employees over 55. Shares have fallen around 3% since the story broke. A confirmation from the company could trigger panic selling.</p><p>It’s also worth noting that Pepsi has finally stopped production in Russia. The country happens to be the company’s second-largest international market after Mexico. The implication of the production halt on growth remains to be seen.</p><p>Amid these uncertainties, PEP stock’s valuation looks stretched and shares are likely to correct in the near term. Having said that, a 15% to 20% correction from current levels to the $130s would be a good time to consider some bullish exposure.</p><p><b>Costco Wholesale (COST)</b></p><p>In the long term, <b>Costco Wholesale</b>(NASDAQ:<b><u>COST</u></b>) is possibly the best bet among retail stocks. The company has built a strong omnichannel sales presence. Rising member fees are likely to support cash flow, and comparable-store sales have been rising. However, I remain cautious in the near term.</p><p>COST stock has been resilient in the face of the bear market, up 6% over the past year. Yet, with a forward price-earnings ratio of 33.9, shares look relatively expensive amid mounting economic uncertainties including the possibility of a recession in the U.S. in 2023. The impact of aggressive interest rate hikes on consumer spending remains to be seen. I also expect Costco to face margin pressure in a slowdown or recession scenario.</p><p>Those who wish to go long COST stock are likely to get a much better entry point after shares correct.</p><p><b>Freeport-McMoRan (FCX)</b></p><p>Doctor copper has continued to weaken due to two factors. First and foremost, the U.S. dollar has been gaining strength. Second, global economic uncertainty is likely to translate into lower copper demand. In this scenario, I would avoid miner <b>Freeport-McMoRan</b>(NYSE:<b><u>FCX</u></b>).</p><p>FCX stock is 15.6% lower over the past year, slightly better than the <b>S&amp;P 500’s</b>17.7% decline. However, in the event of a global recession, FCX stock is likely to correct further. While its forward price-earnings ratio of 13.1 is well below the broader market index’s forward P/E of 17.9, keep in mind that, in general, cyclical stocks tend to have a lower price-earnings ratio.</p><p>In terms of business fundamentals, Freeport-McMoRan has utilized the copper bull market to strengthen its balance sheet. At the end of the second quarter, the company had just$1.6 billion in net debt. While management expects copper sales to increase in 2023, this may be offset by lower prices.</p><p>In short, this doesn’t look like the ideal time to jump into a copper play. Those who wait for a further correction will likely be rewarded for their patience.</p><p><b>Occidental Petroleum (OXY)</b></p><p><b>Occidental Petroleum</b>(NYSE:<b><u>OXY</u></b>) is on my list of blue-chip stocks to sell because it has gotten much too far ahead of itself, with shares nearly doubling in the past year. Much of this investor enthusiasm has been due to the fact that Warren Buffett continues tobuy up shares despite falling oil prices. Lower oil prices will translate into EBITDA margin compression on a relative basis in the coming quarters.</p><p>Now, I don’t expect a big plunge in oil prices in the coming quarters even if we enter a recession. However, based on how far OXY stock has run over the past 12 months, there appears to be much more downside risk than upside potential at the current level, especially if oil prices continue to trend lower.</p><p>I’m not the only one who thinks this. Analysts from <b>Citigroup</b> and <b>JPMorgan</b> both have“neutral” ratings on the stock due to what they see ascapped upside over the next few months.</p><p>That said, I like the fact that Occidental is focused on deleveraging. In the next few years, the company is likely to have an investment-grade balance sheet. This will provide greater headroom for dividend growth and share repurchases.</p><p>Yet, while Buffett may have pockets deep enough to ride out a big correction in the stock, individual investors may not feel the same way.</p><p></p></body></html>","source":"investorplace","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>4 Blue-Chip Stocks to Sell in October</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n4 Blue-Chip Stocks to Sell in October\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-10-01 11:42 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://investorplace.com/2022/09/4-blue-chip-stocks-to-sell-in-october/><strong>InvestorPlace</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>These blue-chip stocks to sell face macroeconomic and/or company-specific headwinds.PepsiCo(PEP): Valuations look stretched, especially with growth likely to slow.Costco Wholesale(COST): A correction ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://investorplace.com/2022/09/4-blue-chip-stocks-to-sell-in-october/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"FCX":"麦克莫兰铜金","COST":"好市多","OXY":"西方石油","PEP":"百事可乐"},"source_url":"https://investorplace.com/2022/09/4-blue-chip-stocks-to-sell-in-october/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1133444550","content_text":"These blue-chip stocks to sell face macroeconomic and/or company-specific headwinds.PepsiCo(PEP): Valuations look stretched, especially with growth likely to slow.Costco Wholesale(COST): A correction would provide a much better entry point.Freeport-McMoRan(FCX): Now doesn't look like the ideal time to bet on copper.Occidental Petroleum(OXY): You may not be as comfortable as Warren Buffett riding out a correction.In general, when markets trend lower, it makes sense to invest in blue-chip stocks. They tend to have a low beta and also provide regular cash flows through dividends. Yet, not all blue chips are created equal. Based on macroeconomic or company-specific factors, there are some you want to buy and some blue-chip stocks to sell.For example, blue-chip retailer Target (NYSE:TGT) sits 45% below its 52-week high, weighed down by inflationary pressures and margin compression. And pharmaceutical giant Pfizer(NYSE:PFE) is 30% below its high on concerns of a slowdown in growth predominately due to lower Covid-19 vaccine sales.So, investors need to carry out due diligence even with blue chips. Today’s list of blue-chip stocks to sell in October contains popular names that are likely to correct or correct even further.PepsiCo (PEP)PepsiCo(NASDAQ:PEP) stock is up 11% over the past year, bucking the broader bear market, and it throws off a healthy 2.7% dividend yield. However, shares look expensive with a forward price-earnings ratio of 22.8.PepsiCo is likely to see decelerating growth or margin pressure in the coming quarters. The company is reportedly considering cost-cutting measures, including layoffs and buyouts for some employees over 55. Shares have fallen around 3% since the story broke. A confirmation from the company could trigger panic selling.It’s also worth noting that Pepsi has finally stopped production in Russia. The country happens to be the company’s second-largest international market after Mexico. The implication of the production halt on growth remains to be seen.Amid these uncertainties, PEP stock’s valuation looks stretched and shares are likely to correct in the near term. Having said that, a 15% to 20% correction from current levels to the $130s would be a good time to consider some bullish exposure.Costco Wholesale (COST)In the long term, Costco Wholesale(NASDAQ:COST) is possibly the best bet among retail stocks. The company has built a strong omnichannel sales presence. Rising member fees are likely to support cash flow, and comparable-store sales have been rising. However, I remain cautious in the near term.COST stock has been resilient in the face of the bear market, up 6% over the past year. Yet, with a forward price-earnings ratio of 33.9, shares look relatively expensive amid mounting economic uncertainties including the possibility of a recession in the U.S. in 2023. The impact of aggressive interest rate hikes on consumer spending remains to be seen. I also expect Costco to face margin pressure in a slowdown or recession scenario.Those who wish to go long COST stock are likely to get a much better entry point after shares correct.Freeport-McMoRan (FCX)Doctor copper has continued to weaken due to two factors. First and foremost, the U.S. dollar has been gaining strength. Second, global economic uncertainty is likely to translate into lower copper demand. In this scenario, I would avoid miner Freeport-McMoRan(NYSE:FCX).FCX stock is 15.6% lower over the past year, slightly better than the S&P 500’s17.7% decline. However, in the event of a global recession, FCX stock is likely to correct further. While its forward price-earnings ratio of 13.1 is well below the broader market index’s forward P/E of 17.9, keep in mind that, in general, cyclical stocks tend to have a lower price-earnings ratio.In terms of business fundamentals, Freeport-McMoRan has utilized the copper bull market to strengthen its balance sheet. At the end of the second quarter, the company had just$1.6 billion in net debt. While management expects copper sales to increase in 2023, this may be offset by lower prices.In short, this doesn’t look like the ideal time to jump into a copper play. Those who wait for a further correction will likely be rewarded for their patience.Occidental Petroleum (OXY)Occidental Petroleum(NYSE:OXY) is on my list of blue-chip stocks to sell because it has gotten much too far ahead of itself, with shares nearly doubling in the past year. Much of this investor enthusiasm has been due to the fact that Warren Buffett continues tobuy up shares despite falling oil prices. Lower oil prices will translate into EBITDA margin compression on a relative basis in the coming quarters.Now, I don’t expect a big plunge in oil prices in the coming quarters even if we enter a recession. However, based on how far OXY stock has run over the past 12 months, there appears to be much more downside risk than upside potential at the current level, especially if oil prices continue to trend lower.I’m not the only one who thinks this. Analysts from Citigroup and JPMorgan both have“neutral” ratings on the stock due to what they see ascapped upside over the next few months.That said, I like the fact that Occidental is focused on deleveraging. In the next few years, the company is likely to have an investment-grade balance sheet. This will provide greater headroom for dividend growth and share repurchases.Yet, while Buffett may have pockets deep enough to ride out a big correction in the stock, individual investors may not feel the same way.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":545,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9935356913,"gmtCreate":1663035798233,"gmtModify":1676537188415,"author":{"id":"3574915362300502","authorId":"3574915362300502","name":"Thunderbird","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/86528f4fb847fbbf69680f5b0c603119","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574915362300502","authorIdStr":"3574915362300502"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"That we know. We are more concern if the cpi is above or below 8.1%. Anyone can tell me?","listText":"That we know. We are more concern if the cpi is above or below 8.1%. Anyone can tell me?","text":"That we know. We are more concern if the cpi is above or below 8.1%. Anyone can tell me?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9935356913","repostId":"1154864878","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":515,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9995859963,"gmtCreate":1661446670654,"gmtModify":1676536520300,"author":{"id":"3574915362300502","authorId":"3574915362300502","name":"Thunderbird","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/86528f4fb847fbbf69680f5b0c603119","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574915362300502","authorIdStr":"3574915362300502"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"More liquidity, why not?","listText":"More liquidity, why not?","text":"More liquidity, why not?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9995859963","repostId":"2262018006","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2262018006","pubTimestamp":1661419523,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2262018006?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-08-25 17:25","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Is Tesla's Stock Split Good For Investors?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2262018006","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"This will be the second time that Tesla splits its stock. Tesla previously did a 5-for-1 stock split on Aug. 31, 2020. Shares have risen over 100% since then.Is Tesla's Stock Split Good For Investors?This is probably the most important question for most investors and also the most difficult to answer.There'ssome evidencethat companies that split their stock outperform in aggregate in the short term, perhaps in part because splitting allows some stocks to be included in indexes like the Dow and i","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>Summary</b></p><ul><li>I answer some of the most common questions from investors about stock splits.</li><li>Stock splits don&#39;t matter nearly as much as fundamentals, but they&#39;re certainly not bad for investors.</li><li>I also recap Tesla&#39;s recent Q2 earnings report.</li></ul><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ea05668b1422a0e51297e199e4d62ddc\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"720\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Ajax9/iStock Editorial via Getty Images</span></p><p><b>Thesis</b></p><p>After Q2 earnings, I updated my price target for Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) stock to $765 pre-split, which implies 14% downside from the current price. As I&#39;ve shared in past articles (1,2), the key assumption inmy model is that Tesla grows at a 25% CAGR over the next decade primarily due to growth in electric vehicle sales. While the upcoming Tesla stock split isn&#39;t material to my thesis, investors may have questions about how the split works, and I&#39;ll attempt to answer some of the common ones in this article.</p><p><b>Stock Split FAQs</b></p><p>I covered Tesla&#39;s stock split in my last article, but I&#39;ll recap a few of the key questions and answers about the split here. Those who read my previous article or are experienced with stock splits can skip to the next section.</p><p><b>How Do Stock Splits Impact Your Investment?</b></p><p>The total value of your investment isn&#39;t directly impacted by the stock split because a company&#39;s market cap is unchanged by stock splits. The decrease in price per share is offset by the increase in the number of shares you own.</p><p>For example, say Tesla is worth $900 before the split and you have one share. After the split, you&#39;ll have three shares, but each will be worth $300. Either way, you have $900. Of course, the value of Tesla stock may change as the market rises and falls from day to day, but that happens whether or not there&#39;s a split going on.</p><p>It&#39;s also worth noting that the price per share and price per options contract will be lower after the split, which will make non-fractional shares and options more accessible to small investors.</p><p><b>What Happens If You Buy Tesla Before The Split?</b></p><p>Buying Tesla stock before the split is not very different from buying it after the split or any other day. You&#39;d buy 3x fewer shares before the split as you would after the split in order to keep the total amount invested the same.</p><p><b>When Will Tesla Stock Split?</b></p><p>You will get two additional shares of Tesla stock for each share you already own on Wednesday, Aug. 24, after the market closes. Shares will trade at their post-split price starting on Thursday, Aug. 25.</p><p><b>How Many Times Has Tesla Stock Split?</b></p><p>This will be the second time that Tesla splits its stock. Tesla previously did a 5-for-1 stock split on Aug. 31, 2020. Shares have risen over 100% since then.</p><p><b>Is Tesla&#39;s Stock Split Good For Investors?</b></p><p>In other words, do stock splits impact performance? This is probably the most important question for most investors and also the most difficult to answer.</p><p>There&#39;s some evidence that companies that split their stock outperform in aggregate in the short term, perhaps in part because splitting allows some stocks to be included in indexes like the Dow and increases their accessibility to retail investors. However, looking at individual stocks, there are many cases where a stock declines around the time of its split. Thus, I wouldn&#39;t recommend betting on short-term price appreciation in a single stock because of its split.</p><p>However, splits certainly aren&#39;t bad news. They usually only happen after a stock has increased in value a lot, as Tesla stock has done over the past few years. Winners tend to keep winning, so betting on companies that already have done well can be a successful strategy.</p><p>Also, companies usually won&#39;t split their stock unless they believe that their share price will keep increasing. One reason is that there are minimum share price requirements to be listed on the NYSE and Nasdaq exchanges. That said, even at the post-split price of ~$300, Tesla is a long way from falling to the current $1 per share requirement.</p><p>Relative to more important considerations like earnings growth and valuation multiples, stock splits are essentially a neutral event for long-term investors. But in a vacuum, it&#39;s clear that stock splits are more positive than negative.</p><p><b>Q2 Earnings</b></p><p>Because the stock split doesn&#39;t impact Tesla&#39;s fundamentals, I won&#39;t adjust my target market cap for Tesla as a result of the split. However, I did update my price target for Tesla since my last article in June as a result of Tesla&#39;s Q2 earnings. I shared my updated $767 target with Tech Investing Edge members after Tesla reported.</p><p>I was disappointed by the earnings, mostly because I found slowing revenue growth more disappointing than a 27% EPS beat was impressive. After management constantly talked about Tesla&#39;s ability to maintain &gt;50% revenue growth over the coming quarters, growth fell to 42% in Q2. Considering that most Tesla models are heavily backordered, management correctly blamed the slowdown on production issues rather than a lack of demand. Even so, they admitted that 50% growth would be a more difficult target to attain going forward as they work to ramp up production.</p><p>I&#39;ve never believed Tesla&#39;s 50% growth target, and model them growing at a 25% CAGR over the coming decade. Nevertheless, I did expect them to stay above 50% for at least a few more quarters considering management&#39;s bullishness and my expectation for slower growth in the back half of the decade.</p><p>Despite the slowdown this quarter, I still think that my long-term 25% CAGR target is attainable, as even 42% growth is well above that level and management guided for a re-acceleration this quarter. Thus, despite being disappointed by the earnings, I raised my price target from $714 to $767 to account for Tesla&#39;s now-larger ttm revenue and EPS.</p><p><b>Conclusion</b></p><p>Stock splits tend to get a lot of media coverage, but for long-term investors they&#39;re not a big deal. Tesla has been able to split its stock multiple times because the company and Tesla stock have done very well, but that&#39;s not a guarantee of future performance.</p><p>If Tesla continues beating analysts&#39; expectations and growing quickly, then the company and its investors will likely continue to do well. However, production issues and competition could stop Tesla from reaching this goal, and the current valuation doesn&#39;t leave much room for error. Based on my own growth estimates and profitability model, I think that Tesla is slightly overvalued going into its stock split. Nevertheless, I view Tesla stock as a hold, since ~14% overvaluation isn&#39;t extreme.</p><p><i>This article was written by Kennan Mell. </i></p><p><i>This article is for reference only. You can take what is useful to you.</i></p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Is Tesla's Stock Split Good For Investors?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nIs Tesla's Stock Split Good For Investors?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-08-25 17:25 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4536846-tesla-stock-split-good-for-investors><strong>Seeking Alpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>SummaryI answer some of the most common questions from investors about stock splits.Stock splits don't matter nearly as much as fundamentals, but they're certainly not bad for investors.I also recap ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4536846-tesla-stock-split-good-for-investors\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4536846-tesla-stock-split-good-for-investors","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2262018006","content_text":"SummaryI answer some of the most common questions from investors about stock splits.Stock splits don't matter nearly as much as fundamentals, but they're certainly not bad for investors.I also recap Tesla's recent Q2 earnings report.Ajax9/iStock Editorial via Getty ImagesThesisAfter Q2 earnings, I updated my price target for Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) stock to $765 pre-split, which implies 14% downside from the current price. As I've shared in past articles (1,2), the key assumption inmy model is that Tesla grows at a 25% CAGR over the next decade primarily due to growth in electric vehicle sales. While the upcoming Tesla stock split isn't material to my thesis, investors may have questions about how the split works, and I'll attempt to answer some of the common ones in this article.Stock Split FAQsI covered Tesla's stock split in my last article, but I'll recap a few of the key questions and answers about the split here. Those who read my previous article or are experienced with stock splits can skip to the next section.How Do Stock Splits Impact Your Investment?The total value of your investment isn't directly impacted by the stock split because a company's market cap is unchanged by stock splits. The decrease in price per share is offset by the increase in the number of shares you own.For example, say Tesla is worth $900 before the split and you have one share. After the split, you'll have three shares, but each will be worth $300. Either way, you have $900. Of course, the value of Tesla stock may change as the market rises and falls from day to day, but that happens whether or not there's a split going on.It's also worth noting that the price per share and price per options contract will be lower after the split, which will make non-fractional shares and options more accessible to small investors.What Happens If You Buy Tesla Before The Split?Buying Tesla stock before the split is not very different from buying it after the split or any other day. You'd buy 3x fewer shares before the split as you would after the split in order to keep the total amount invested the same.When Will Tesla Stock Split?You will get two additional shares of Tesla stock for each share you already own on Wednesday, Aug. 24, after the market closes. Shares will trade at their post-split price starting on Thursday, Aug. 25.How Many Times Has Tesla Stock Split?This will be the second time that Tesla splits its stock. Tesla previously did a 5-for-1 stock split on Aug. 31, 2020. Shares have risen over 100% since then.Is Tesla's Stock Split Good For Investors?In other words, do stock splits impact performance? This is probably the most important question for most investors and also the most difficult to answer.There's some evidence that companies that split their stock outperform in aggregate in the short term, perhaps in part because splitting allows some stocks to be included in indexes like the Dow and increases their accessibility to retail investors. However, looking at individual stocks, there are many cases where a stock declines around the time of its split. Thus, I wouldn't recommend betting on short-term price appreciation in a single stock because of its split.However, splits certainly aren't bad news. They usually only happen after a stock has increased in value a lot, as Tesla stock has done over the past few years. Winners tend to keep winning, so betting on companies that already have done well can be a successful strategy.Also, companies usually won't split their stock unless they believe that their share price will keep increasing. One reason is that there are minimum share price requirements to be listed on the NYSE and Nasdaq exchanges. That said, even at the post-split price of ~$300, Tesla is a long way from falling to the current $1 per share requirement.Relative to more important considerations like earnings growth and valuation multiples, stock splits are essentially a neutral event for long-term investors. But in a vacuum, it's clear that stock splits are more positive than negative.Q2 EarningsBecause the stock split doesn't impact Tesla's fundamentals, I won't adjust my target market cap for Tesla as a result of the split. However, I did update my price target for Tesla since my last article in June as a result of Tesla's Q2 earnings. I shared my updated $767 target with Tech Investing Edge members after Tesla reported.I was disappointed by the earnings, mostly because I found slowing revenue growth more disappointing than a 27% EPS beat was impressive. After management constantly talked about Tesla's ability to maintain >50% revenue growth over the coming quarters, growth fell to 42% in Q2. Considering that most Tesla models are heavily backordered, management correctly blamed the slowdown on production issues rather than a lack of demand. Even so, they admitted that 50% growth would be a more difficult target to attain going forward as they work to ramp up production.I've never believed Tesla's 50% growth target, and model them growing at a 25% CAGR over the coming decade. Nevertheless, I did expect them to stay above 50% for at least a few more quarters considering management's bullishness and my expectation for slower growth in the back half of the decade.Despite the slowdown this quarter, I still think that my long-term 25% CAGR target is attainable, as even 42% growth is well above that level and management guided for a re-acceleration this quarter. Thus, despite being disappointed by the earnings, I raised my price target from $714 to $767 to account for Tesla's now-larger ttm revenue and EPS.ConclusionStock splits tend to get a lot of media coverage, but for long-term investors they're not a big deal. Tesla has been able to split its stock multiple times because the company and Tesla stock have done very well, but that's not a guarantee of future performance.If Tesla continues beating analysts' expectations and growing quickly, then the company and its investors will likely continue to do well. However, production issues and competition could stop Tesla from reaching this goal, and the current valuation doesn't leave much room for error. Based on my own growth estimates and profitability model, I think that Tesla is slightly overvalued going into its stock split. Nevertheless, I view Tesla stock as a hold, since ~14% overvaluation isn't extreme.This article was written by Kennan Mell. This article is for reference only. You can take what is useful to you.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":447,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9995850282,"gmtCreate":1661446640248,"gmtModify":1676536520285,"author":{"id":"3574915362300502","authorId":"3574915362300502","name":"Thunderbird","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/86528f4fb847fbbf69680f5b0c603119","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574915362300502","authorIdStr":"3574915362300502"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"The rally is going to continue! No thanks for this.","listText":"The rally is going to continue! No thanks for this.","text":"The rally is going to continue! No thanks for this.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9995850282","repostId":"1156244664","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1156244664","pubTimestamp":1661421421,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1156244664?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-08-25 17:57","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Worried About the End of the Summer Rally? Inverse ETFs to Tap","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1156244664","media":"Zacks","summary":"The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 640 points on Monday, marking its worst day since June (per CN","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 640 points on Monday, marking its worst day since June (per CNBC), as the summer rally faded and fears of faster interest rate hikes returned to Wall Street.The Fed will likely hike rates by 50 basis points in September amid higher inflation and growing recession worries, according to economists in a Reuters poll.</p><p>Traders are now pricing in around a 46.5% chance of a 75-basis-point rate hike in September and a 53.5% chance of a 50-bp increase following recent hawkish remarks from Fed officials.The dollar jumped to a more than one-month high against its rivals.</p><p>The Nasdaq, which is high-growth in nature and underperforms in a rising rate environment, dropped 2.6% on Monday. Monday&#39;s losses marked the biggest two-day declines for the Nasdaq and the S&amp;P 500 since June. For the S&amp;P 500, Monday indicated the index&#39;s largest decline since June 16, the day which marked the market&#39;s most recent bottom, per a yahoo finance article.</p><p>Last week, the major averages snapped their winning streaks for the first time in four weeks, in fact, snapping their longest weekly winning streak since November 2021. WTI crude oil futures have also been volatile, with crude falling below $87 a barrel on Monday morning. However, news of possible production cuts from Saudi Arabia pushed crude back towards $90 a barrel later on.</p><p>Against this backdrop, below we highlight a few inverse ETFs that could be useful in the current scenario.</p><p><b>ETFs in Focus</b></p><p><b>ProShares Short S&amp;P500 (SH)</b></p><p>The ProShares Short S&amp;P500 seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to the inverse or opposite of the daily performance of the S&amp;P500. The fund charges 88 bps in fees.</p><p><b>Direxion Daily S&amp;P 500 Bear 1x Shares (SPDN)</b></p><p>The Direxion Daily S&amp;P 500 Bear 1X Shares seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, of 100% of the inverse (or opposite) of the performance of the S&amp;P 500 Index. The fund charges 49 bps in fees.</p><p><b>ProShares UltraShort S&amp;P500 (SDS)</b></p><p>The ProShares UltraShort S&amp;P500 seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to twice (200%) the inverse (opposite) of the daily performance of the S&amp;P 500. The fund charges 90 bps in fees.</p><p><b>ProShares UltraPro Short S&amp;P500 (SPXU)</b></p><p>The ProShares UltraPro Short S&amp;P500 seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to triple (300%) the inverse (opposite) of the daily performance of the S&amp;P 500. The fund charges 90 bps in fees.</p><p><b>Direxion Daily S&amp;P 500 Bear 3X Shares (SPXS)</b></p><p>The ProShares UltraPro Short S&amp;P500 seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to triple (300%) the inverse (opposite) of the daily performance of the S&amp;P 500. The fund charges 90 bps in fees.</p><p><b>ProShares Short Russell2000 (RWM)</b></p><p>The ProShares Short Russell2000 seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to the inverse (opposite) of the daily performance of the Russell 2000 Index. The fund charges 95 bps in fees.</p><p><b>ProShares Short Dow30 (DOG)</b></p><p>ProShares Short Dow30 seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to the inverse (opposite) of the daily performance of the Dow Jones Industrial Average Index. The fund charges 95 bps in fees.</p><p><b>ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ)</b></p><p>The ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to triple the inverse of the daily performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. The fund charges 95 bps in fees.</p><p><b>ProShares Short QQQ (PSQ)</b></p><p>The ProShares Short QQQ seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to the inverse of the daily performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. The fund charges 95 bps in fees.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Worried About the End of the Summer Rally? Inverse ETFs to Tap</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWorried About the End of the Summer Rally? Inverse ETFs to Tap\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-08-25 17:57 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.zacks.com/stock/news/1971531/summer-rally-ended-inverse-etfs-to-tap?-inverse-etfs-to-tap-><strong>Zacks</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 640 points on Monday, marking its worst day since June (per CNBC), as the summer rally faded and fears of faster interest rate hikes returned to Wall Street.The ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.zacks.com/stock/news/1971531/summer-rally-ended-inverse-etfs-to-tap?-inverse-etfs-to-tap-\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SH":"标普500反向ETF","SPXS":"Direxion每日三倍做空标普500ETF","RWM":"罗素2000指数反向ETF","PSQ":"纳指反向ETF","DOG":"道指反向ETF","SDS":"两倍做空标普500ETF","SPXU":"三倍做空标普500ETF","SQQQ":"纳指三倍做空ETF","SPDN":"Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares"},"source_url":"https://www.zacks.com/stock/news/1971531/summer-rally-ended-inverse-etfs-to-tap?-inverse-etfs-to-tap-","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1156244664","content_text":"The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 640 points on Monday, marking its worst day since June (per CNBC), as the summer rally faded and fears of faster interest rate hikes returned to Wall Street.The Fed will likely hike rates by 50 basis points in September amid higher inflation and growing recession worries, according to economists in a Reuters poll.Traders are now pricing in around a 46.5% chance of a 75-basis-point rate hike in September and a 53.5% chance of a 50-bp increase following recent hawkish remarks from Fed officials.The dollar jumped to a more than one-month high against its rivals.The Nasdaq, which is high-growth in nature and underperforms in a rising rate environment, dropped 2.6% on Monday. Monday's losses marked the biggest two-day declines for the Nasdaq and the S&P 500 since June. For the S&P 500, Monday indicated the index's largest decline since June 16, the day which marked the market's most recent bottom, per a yahoo finance article.Last week, the major averages snapped their winning streaks for the first time in four weeks, in fact, snapping their longest weekly winning streak since November 2021. WTI crude oil futures have also been volatile, with crude falling below $87 a barrel on Monday morning. However, news of possible production cuts from Saudi Arabia pushed crude back towards $90 a barrel later on.Against this backdrop, below we highlight a few inverse ETFs that could be useful in the current scenario.ETFs in FocusProShares Short S&P500 (SH)The ProShares Short S&P500 seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to the inverse or opposite of the daily performance of the S&P500. The fund charges 88 bps in fees.Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares (SPDN)The Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1X Shares seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, of 100% of the inverse (or opposite) of the performance of the S&P 500 Index. The fund charges 49 bps in fees.ProShares UltraShort S&P500 (SDS)The ProShares UltraShort S&P500 seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to twice (200%) the inverse (opposite) of the daily performance of the S&P 500. The fund charges 90 bps in fees.ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500 (SPXU)The ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500 seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to triple (300%) the inverse (opposite) of the daily performance of the S&P 500. The fund charges 90 bps in fees.Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 3X Shares (SPXS)The ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500 seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to triple (300%) the inverse (opposite) of the daily performance of the S&P 500. The fund charges 90 bps in fees.ProShares Short Russell2000 (RWM)The ProShares Short Russell2000 seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to the inverse (opposite) of the daily performance of the Russell 2000 Index. The fund charges 95 bps in fees.ProShares Short Dow30 (DOG)ProShares Short Dow30 seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to the inverse (opposite) of the daily performance of the Dow Jones Industrial Average Index. The fund charges 95 bps in fees.ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ)The ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to triple the inverse of the daily performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. The fund charges 95 bps in fees.ProShares Short QQQ (PSQ)The ProShares Short QQQ seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to the inverse of the daily performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. The fund charges 95 bps in fees.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":708,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9996761598,"gmtCreate":1661216772516,"gmtModify":1676536476209,"author":{"id":"3574915362300502","authorId":"3574915362300502","name":"Thunderbird","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/86528f4fb847fbbf69680f5b0c603119","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574915362300502","authorIdStr":"3574915362300502"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Not buying anything in this market.&nbsp;","listText":"Not buying anything in this market.&nbsp;","text":"Not buying anything in this market.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9996761598","repostId":"2261542259","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2261542259","pubTimestamp":1661227323,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2261542259?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-08-23 12:02","market":"us","language":"en","title":"3 Stocks to Avoid This Week","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2261542259","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"These investments seem pretty vulnerable right now.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Things turned out pretty well for my &#34;three stocks to avoid&#34; column last week. The three stocks I thought were going to lose to the market for the week -- <b>Tesla Motors</b>, <b>Bath &amp; Body Works</b>, and <b>AMTD Digital</b> -- fell 1%, 3%, and 11%, respectively, averaging out to a 5% decline.</p><p>The <b>S&amp;P 500</b> experienced a 1.2% move lower. I was right. I have now been correct in 29 of the past 44 weeks, or nearly two-thirds of the time.</p><p>Now let&#39;s look at the week ahead. I see <b>Baozun</b>, <b>La-Z-Boy</b>, and <b>Bed Bath &amp; Beyond</b> as stocks you may want to consider steering clear of this week. Let&#39;s go over my near-term concerns with all three investments.</p><h2><b>1. Baozun</b></h2><p>Providing e-commerce solutions in China for global brands isn&#39;t as juicy a business model for Baozun as it seemed a few years ago. China&#39;s been making enemies overseas, and the economy itself in the world&#39;s most populous nation is slowing. It reports fresh financials on Tuesday morning, and it&#39;s OK to be concerned.</p><p>Analysts see Baozun&#39;s revenue clocking in 19% lower for this week&#39;s second quarter than it did a year earlier. It sees a 71% plunge in earnings per share. Momentum hasn&#39;t been kind, as Baozun has fallen short of analyst expectations in two of the last three quarters. The stock did shoot higher last time out, but that was with just a 2% decline in revenue. The market was hopeful that Baozun&#39;s business shifting from first-party sales to higher-margin services and third-party sales would help improve its margins, but we&#39;re clearly seeing the bottom line going the wrong way.</p><h2><b>2. La-Z-Boy</b></h2><p>It&#39;s not just La-Z-Boy&#39;s signature chair that&#39;s reclining these days. The furniture maker is another company likely to see its business decline later this year. La-Z-Boy is expected to post its fifth consecutive quarter of double-digit percentage growth on the top line later this week, but analysts see the trend reversing as the fiscal year plays out.</p><p>We&#39;ve already seen manufacturers and retailers of home furnishings stumble this earnings season. Folks that loaded up on making their homes more comfortable in 2020 and 2021 have moved on in this inflationary environment. They were spending money on experiences outside of the home, and now they&#39;re just earmarking more money to pay for food. La-Z-Boy can&#39;t party like it&#39;s 2021 anymore.</p><h2><b>3. Bed Bath &amp; Beyond</b></h2><p>Shares of the home goods retailer plummeted 40% on Friday after a prolific meme stock investor cashed out of his position. With a major backer gone, Bed Bath &amp; Beyond is going to have to rest on its fundamentals -- and that&#39;s not very encouraging.</p><p>Bed Bath &amp; Beyond has rattled off four consecutive quarters of year-over-year revenue declines of at least 20%. This will be its fifth straight year of losses. This is not a sustainable business without the hype that Ryan Cohen brought to the table setting, and even after a 40% haircut, the shares are highly problematic at this point.</p><p>It&#39;s going to be a bumpy road for some of these investments. If you&#39;re looking for safe stocks, you aren&#39;t likely to find them in Baozun, La-Z-Boy, and Bed Bath &amp; Beyond this week.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>3 Stocks to Avoid This Week</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n3 Stocks to Avoid This Week\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-08-23 12:02 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/08/22/3-stocks-to-avoid-this-week/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Things turned out pretty well for my \"three stocks to avoid\" column last week. The three stocks I thought were going to lose to the market for the week -- Tesla Motors, Bath & Body Works, and AMTD ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/08/22/3-stocks-to-avoid-this-week/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BZUN":"宝尊电商","LZB":"La-Z-Boy家具","BBBY":"3B家居"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/08/22/3-stocks-to-avoid-this-week/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2261542259","content_text":"Things turned out pretty well for my \"three stocks to avoid\" column last week. The three stocks I thought were going to lose to the market for the week -- Tesla Motors, Bath & Body Works, and AMTD Digital -- fell 1%, 3%, and 11%, respectively, averaging out to a 5% decline.The S&P 500 experienced a 1.2% move lower. I was right. I have now been correct in 29 of the past 44 weeks, or nearly two-thirds of the time.Now let's look at the week ahead. I see Baozun, La-Z-Boy, and Bed Bath & Beyond as stocks you may want to consider steering clear of this week. Let's go over my near-term concerns with all three investments.1. BaozunProviding e-commerce solutions in China for global brands isn't as juicy a business model for Baozun as it seemed a few years ago. China's been making enemies overseas, and the economy itself in the world's most populous nation is slowing. It reports fresh financials on Tuesday morning, and it's OK to be concerned.Analysts see Baozun's revenue clocking in 19% lower for this week's second quarter than it did a year earlier. It sees a 71% plunge in earnings per share. Momentum hasn't been kind, as Baozun has fallen short of analyst expectations in two of the last three quarters. The stock did shoot higher last time out, but that was with just a 2% decline in revenue. The market was hopeful that Baozun's business shifting from first-party sales to higher-margin services and third-party sales would help improve its margins, but we're clearly seeing the bottom line going the wrong way.2. La-Z-BoyIt's not just La-Z-Boy's signature chair that's reclining these days. The furniture maker is another company likely to see its business decline later this year. La-Z-Boy is expected to post its fifth consecutive quarter of double-digit percentage growth on the top line later this week, but analysts see the trend reversing as the fiscal year plays out.We've already seen manufacturers and retailers of home furnishings stumble this earnings season. Folks that loaded up on making their homes more comfortable in 2020 and 2021 have moved on in this inflationary environment. They were spending money on experiences outside of the home, and now they're just earmarking more money to pay for food. La-Z-Boy can't party like it's 2021 anymore.3. Bed Bath & BeyondShares of the home goods retailer plummeted 40% on Friday after a prolific meme stock investor cashed out of his position. With a major backer gone, Bed Bath & Beyond is going to have to rest on its fundamentals -- and that's not very encouraging.Bed Bath & Beyond has rattled off four consecutive quarters of year-over-year revenue declines of at least 20%. This will be its fifth straight year of losses. This is not a sustainable business without the hype that Ryan Cohen brought to the table setting, and even after a 40% haircut, the shares are highly problematic at this point.It's going to be a bumpy road for some of these investments. If you're looking for safe stocks, you aren't likely to find them in Baozun, La-Z-Boy, and Bed Bath & Beyond this week.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":265,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9996169796,"gmtCreate":1661133041117,"gmtModify":1676536458716,"author":{"id":"3574915362300502","authorId":"3574915362300502","name":"Thunderbird","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/86528f4fb847fbbf69680f5b0c603119","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574915362300502","authorIdStr":"3574915362300502"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9996169796","repostId":"1145254202","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1145254202","pubTimestamp":1661130354,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1145254202?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-08-22 09:05","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Jackson Hole, Inflation, Dollar Stores: What to Know This Week in Markets","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1145254202","media":"Yahoo Finance","summary":"The attention of the financial world will turn to Grand Teton National Park in the week ahead.The Ka","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>The attention of the financial world will turn to Grand Teton National Park in the week ahead.</p><p>The Kansas City Federal Reserve will host its annual economic symposium in Jackson Hole this week, with Friday morning&#39;s speech from Fed Chair Jerome Powell expected to highlight the proceedings as investors search for clues on the central bank&#39;s next move.</p><p>This year&#39;s symposium marks the first in-person Jackson Hole conference since 2019.</p><p>A close-reading of Powell&#39;s comments on Friday will boil down to whether investors see the Fed chair signaling another 0.75% interest rate hike from the Fed at its next policy announcement on September 21, or whether the Fed will ease its pace of rate hikes and increase benchmark rates by 0.50%.</p><p>In a note to clients Friday, Andrew Hunter, senior U.S. economist at Capital Economics, wrote that recent economic events are likely to set the table for a 0.50% rate hike in September.</p><p>July inflation data showed a modest softening in inflation pressures, arguing for easing the pace of hikes. The July jobs report dispelled concerns from some Fed officials that the labor market is softening, perhaps making the case for continued aggression on raising rates.</p><p>&#34;To the extent that those developments cancel each other out, we still expect the Fed to hike rates by 50 [basis points] next month,&#34; Hunter wrote. &#34;There doesn’t appear to be much need for Chair Jerome Powell to adjust expectations when he speaks at Jackson Hole next Friday.&#34;</p><p>Powell&#39;s speech will be released at 10:00 a.m. ET on Friday, and for the first time the Fed chair&#39;s speech — seen as the most important central bank communication of the year — will stream live. Yahoo Finance&#39;sBrian Cheung will be on the ground in Wyoming to bring readers and viewers full coverage of the events.</p><p>In addition to Powell&#39;s speech, updates on service sector activity, inflation, and consumer sentiment will feature on the economic calendar. PCE inflation — the Fed&#39;s preferred measure — is set for release at 8:30 a.m. ET on Friday, just 90 minutes before Powell&#39;s speech. Powell&#39;s speech will begin simultaneously with the release of the University of Michigan&#39;s latest consumer sentiment index.</p><p>For Fed Watchers, the coming week will hardly offer a summer Friday.</p><p>Though earnings season has largely wrapped up, this week&#39;s trickle of results will still offer investors key updates, with reports out of Nvidia (NVDA), salesforce.com (CRM), Ulta Beauty (ULTA), and dollar store operators Dollar Tree (DLTR) and Dollar General (DG) — the week&#39;s most notable releases.</p><p>Last week&#39;s results from Walmart(WMT) andTarget(TGT) helped allay some investor fears over the state of the consumer, with these results coming in better-than-feared. However, both companies&#39; reports signaled a more cautious approach from shoppers as inflation pressures bit during the summer months.</p><p>Walmart CFO John David Rainey told Yahoo Finance last week the company saw customers trade down — particularly in grocery — during the quarter. Rainey also told analysts on a conference call the company had canceled billions in orders.</p><p>Back in May, Dollar Tree and Dollar General offered some of the earliest indications that consumers were using their grocery runs as an opportunity to cut costs. Results from both retailers this week will be parsed for signs of any continued, modified, or accelerated behavioral shifts.</p><p>Nvidia&#39;s latest report comes also comes at a crucial juncture for the semiconductor industry, often seen as a bellwether for global economic demand. Earlier this month, Nvidiawarned its quarterly results would miss estimates, and reports this week catalogued the growing concerns around demand in the chip space as global economic activity appears to soften.</p><p>Last week, markets snapped a four-week winning streak, with the tech-heavy Nasdaq dropping over 2% and the S&amp;P 500 falling more than 1%.</p><p>This loss of momentum in the summer market rally came as the latest leg of the meme stock trade fizzled out, with Bed Bath &amp; Beyond (BBBY) shares falling 40% on Friday, after GameStop (GME) chairman Ryan Cohen disclosed he&#39;d sold his entire 11.8% position in the struggling retailer.</p><p>Cohen&#39;s sale also came as Bloomberg reported late Thursday that Bed Bath &amp; Beyond has engaged Kirkland &amp; Ellis, a law firm known for its restructuring and bankruptcy work. After the close on Friday, Bloomberg reported some suppliers for Bed Bath &amp; Beyond had halted shipments due to unpaid bills by the retailer.</p><p>While the collapse in Bed Bath &amp; Beyond shares served as the splashiest move, last week also saw several of this summer&#39;s &#34;losers turned winners&#34; struggle, with names like Peloton (PTON), Robinhood (HOOD), and Coinbase (COIN) all falling more than 13% for the week.</p><p>—</p><p>Economic calendar</p><p>Monday: <b>Chicago Fed National Activity Index</b>, July (-0.19 previously)</p><p>Tuesday: <b>S&amp;P Global U.S. Manufacturing PMI</b>, August preliminary (51.9 expected, 52.2 previously); <b>S&amp;P Global U.S. Services PMI</b>, August preliminary (50 expected, 47.3 previously); <b>Richmond Fed manufacturing index</b>, August (-5 expected, 0 previously); <b>New home sales</b>, July (-2.5% expected, -8.1% expected)</p><p>Wednesday: <b>MBA mortgage applications</b>; <b>Durable goods orders</b>, July (+0.8% expected, +2% previously);<b>Durable goods orders excluding transportation</b>, July (+0.2% expected; +0.4% previously); <b>Pending home sales</b>, July (-2% expected, -8.6% previously)</p><p>Thursday: <b>Initial jobless claims</b>(252,000 expected, 250,000 previously); <b>Second quarter GDP</b>, second estimate (-0.8% expected; -0.9% previously); <b>Kansas City Fed manufacturing activity</b>, August (13 previously)</p><p>Friday:<b>Personal income</b>, July (+0.6% expected, +0.6% previously);<b>Personal spending</b>, July (+0.5% expected, +1.1% previously);<b>Whole inventories</b>, July (+1.4% expected, +1.8% previously);<b>Retail inventories</b>, July (+2% previously);<b>PCE, month-on-month</b>, July (+0.1% expected, 1% previously);<b>PCE, year-on-year</b>, July (+6.4% expected, +6.8% previously);<b>Core PCE, month-on-month</b>, July (+0.3% expected, +0.6% previously);<b>Core PCE, year-on-year</b>, July (+4.7% expected; +4.8% previously);<b>University of Michigan consumer sentiment</b>, August (55.3 expected, 55.1 previously)</p><p>—</p><p>Earnings calendar</p><p>Monday:<b>Zoom</b>(ZM),<b>Nordson</b>(NDSN),<b>Palo Alto Networks</b>(PANW)</p><p>Tuesday:<b>Medtronic</b>(MDT),<b>J.M. Smucker</b>(SJM),<b>JD.com</b>(JD),<b>Intuit</b>(INTU),<b>Advance Auto Parts</b>(AAP)</p><p>Wednesday:<b>Splunk</b>(SPLK),<b>NetApp</b>(NTAP),<b>Autodesk</b>(ADSK),<b>salesforce.com</b>(CRM),<b>Nvidia</b>(NVDA)</p><p>Thursday:<b>Dollar Tree</b>(DLTR),<b>Dollar General</b>(DG),<b>Workday</b>(WDAY),<b>MarvellTechnology</b>(MRVL),<b>UltaBeauty</b>(ULTA)</p><p>Friday: <i>No major earnings set for release.</i></p><p>—</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Jackson Hole, Inflation, Dollar Stores: What to Know This Week in Markets</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nJackson Hole, Inflation, Dollar Stores: What to Know This Week in Markets\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-08-22 09:05 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/jackson-hole-market-preview-august-21-173439862.html><strong>Yahoo Finance</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The attention of the financial world will turn to Grand Teton National Park in the week ahead.The Kansas City Federal Reserve will host its annual economic symposium in Jackson Hole this week, with ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/jackson-hole-market-preview-august-21-173439862.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/jackson-hole-market-preview-august-21-173439862.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1145254202","content_text":"The attention of the financial world will turn to Grand Teton National Park in the week ahead.The Kansas City Federal Reserve will host its annual economic symposium in Jackson Hole this week, with Friday morning's speech from Fed Chair Jerome Powell expected to highlight the proceedings as investors search for clues on the central bank's next move.This year's symposium marks the first in-person Jackson Hole conference since 2019.A close-reading of Powell's comments on Friday will boil down to whether investors see the Fed chair signaling another 0.75% interest rate hike from the Fed at its next policy announcement on September 21, or whether the Fed will ease its pace of rate hikes and increase benchmark rates by 0.50%.In a note to clients Friday, Andrew Hunter, senior U.S. economist at Capital Economics, wrote that recent economic events are likely to set the table for a 0.50% rate hike in September.July inflation data showed a modest softening in inflation pressures, arguing for easing the pace of hikes. The July jobs report dispelled concerns from some Fed officials that the labor market is softening, perhaps making the case for continued aggression on raising rates.\"To the extent that those developments cancel each other out, we still expect the Fed to hike rates by 50 [basis points] next month,\" Hunter wrote. \"There doesn’t appear to be much need for Chair Jerome Powell to adjust expectations when he speaks at Jackson Hole next Friday.\"Powell's speech will be released at 10:00 a.m. ET on Friday, and for the first time the Fed chair's speech — seen as the most important central bank communication of the year — will stream live. Yahoo Finance'sBrian Cheung will be on the ground in Wyoming to bring readers and viewers full coverage of the events.In addition to Powell's speech, updates on service sector activity, inflation, and consumer sentiment will feature on the economic calendar. PCE inflation — the Fed's preferred measure — is set for release at 8:30 a.m. ET on Friday, just 90 minutes before Powell's speech. Powell's speech will begin simultaneously with the release of the University of Michigan's latest consumer sentiment index.For Fed Watchers, the coming week will hardly offer a summer Friday.Though earnings season has largely wrapped up, this week's trickle of results will still offer investors key updates, with reports out of Nvidia (NVDA), salesforce.com (CRM), Ulta Beauty (ULTA), and dollar store operators Dollar Tree (DLTR) and Dollar General (DG) — the week's most notable releases.Last week's results from Walmart(WMT) andTarget(TGT) helped allay some investor fears over the state of the consumer, with these results coming in better-than-feared. However, both companies' reports signaled a more cautious approach from shoppers as inflation pressures bit during the summer months.Walmart CFO John David Rainey told Yahoo Finance last week the company saw customers trade down — particularly in grocery — during the quarter. Rainey also told analysts on a conference call the company had canceled billions in orders.Back in May, Dollar Tree and Dollar General offered some of the earliest indications that consumers were using their grocery runs as an opportunity to cut costs. Results from both retailers this week will be parsed for signs of any continued, modified, or accelerated behavioral shifts.Nvidia's latest report comes also comes at a crucial juncture for the semiconductor industry, often seen as a bellwether for global economic demand. Earlier this month, Nvidiawarned its quarterly results would miss estimates, and reports this week catalogued the growing concerns around demand in the chip space as global economic activity appears to soften.Last week, markets snapped a four-week winning streak, with the tech-heavy Nasdaq dropping over 2% and the S&P 500 falling more than 1%.This loss of momentum in the summer market rally came as the latest leg of the meme stock trade fizzled out, with Bed Bath & Beyond (BBBY) shares falling 40% on Friday, after GameStop (GME) chairman Ryan Cohen disclosed he'd sold his entire 11.8% position in the struggling retailer.Cohen's sale also came as Bloomberg reported late Thursday that Bed Bath & Beyond has engaged Kirkland & Ellis, a law firm known for its restructuring and bankruptcy work. After the close on Friday, Bloomberg reported some suppliers for Bed Bath & Beyond had halted shipments due to unpaid bills by the retailer.While the collapse in Bed Bath & Beyond shares served as the splashiest move, last week also saw several of this summer's \"losers turned winners\" struggle, with names like Peloton (PTON), Robinhood (HOOD), and Coinbase (COIN) all falling more than 13% for the week.—Economic calendarMonday: Chicago Fed National Activity Index, July (-0.19 previously)Tuesday: S&P Global U.S. Manufacturing PMI, August preliminary (51.9 expected, 52.2 previously); S&P Global U.S. Services PMI, August preliminary (50 expected, 47.3 previously); Richmond Fed manufacturing index, August (-5 expected, 0 previously); New home sales, July (-2.5% expected, -8.1% expected)Wednesday: MBA mortgage applications; Durable goods orders, July (+0.8% expected, +2% previously);Durable goods orders excluding transportation, July (+0.2% expected; +0.4% previously); Pending home sales, July (-2% expected, -8.6% previously)Thursday: Initial jobless claims(252,000 expected, 250,000 previously); Second quarter GDP, second estimate (-0.8% expected; -0.9% previously); Kansas City Fed manufacturing activity, August (13 previously)Friday:Personal income, July (+0.6% expected, +0.6% previously);Personal spending, July (+0.5% expected, +1.1% previously);Whole inventories, July (+1.4% expected, +1.8% previously);Retail inventories, July (+2% previously);PCE, month-on-month, July (+0.1% expected, 1% previously);PCE, year-on-year, July (+6.4% expected, +6.8% previously);Core PCE, month-on-month, July (+0.3% expected, +0.6% previously);Core PCE, year-on-year, July (+4.7% expected; +4.8% previously);University of Michigan consumer sentiment, August (55.3 expected, 55.1 previously)—Earnings calendarMonday:Zoom(ZM),Nordson(NDSN),Palo Alto Networks(PANW)Tuesday:Medtronic(MDT),J.M. Smucker(SJM),JD.com(JD),Intuit(INTU),Advance Auto Parts(AAP)Wednesday:Splunk(SPLK),NetApp(NTAP),Autodesk(ADSK),salesforce.com(CRM),Nvidia(NVDA)Thursday:Dollar Tree(DLTR),Dollar General(DG),Workday(WDAY),MarvellTechnology(MRVL),UltaBeauty(ULTA)Friday: No major earnings set for release.—","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":700,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9996918851,"gmtCreate":1661099141175,"gmtModify":1676536452466,"author":{"id":"3574915362300502","authorId":"3574915362300502","name":"Thunderbird","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/86528f4fb847fbbf69680f5b0c603119","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574915362300502","authorIdStr":"3574915362300502"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Agree!","listText":"Agree!","text":"Agree!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9996918851","repostId":"2260785313","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2260785313","pubTimestamp":1661045446,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2260785313?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-08-21 09:30","market":"us","language":"en","title":"No, There Is No New Short-Selling Champion in Tesla Stock","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2260785313","media":"Barrons","summary":"There was a stir in the Tesla investing community when a regulator filing indicated that asset manag","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>There was a stir in the Tesla investing community when a regulator filing indicated that asset manager Deer Park Road made a seemingly huge bet against Tesla stock using put options. The stir is just a tempest in a teapot. There is no new short-selling champion for Tesla bears to hoist onto their shoulders.</p><p>A put option is, generally speaking, a bearish bet. It gives the holder the right to sell a stock at a fixed price in the future. Holders of put options do better the lower a stock price falls.</p><p>A quarterly regulatory filing indicated that Deer Park had amassed put-option contracts representing more than 4.8 million shares of Tesla (ticker: TSLA) stock. That much Tesla stock is worth roughly $4.3 billion at current prices. On the surface that looks like a massive bet.</p><p>But that isn&#39;t really the way options work. The price paid for an options contract depends on many factors including the strike price and time to contract expiration.</p><p>Consider Tesla put options that expire Friday Aug. 19, and give the holder the right to sell Tesla stock at about $800 a share are essentially trading for about one cent. Theoretically, amassing options contracts that reflect 4.8 million shares of Tesla could cost someone $48,000. That&#39;s a long way from $4.3 billion.</p><p>It wouldn&#39;t be a good idea, though. There isn&#39;t high probability that Tesla stock will drop about $100 in the final hour of trading Friday.</p><p>(There isn&#39;t much trading volume in those contracts. It&#39;s just an example.)</p><p>Deer Park Chief Investment Officer Scott Burg told Barron&#39;s the Tesla put-options position amounted to 0.1% of his portfolio. That isn&#39;t all that much, and indicates Deer Park probably paid the less than $1 per share represented the puts.</p><p>That isn&#39;t a lot for a stock worth about $900. That also means the put options were either expiring soon, or deeply out of the money, or both. Burg didn&#39;t get into contract specifics, but said the position was closed profitably. The tiny position is already gone.</p><p>Profits aren&#39;t hard to fathom. Tesla stock did fall, along with other technology shares, in the second quarter. Tesla stock dropped almost 38% from the end of March to the end of June while the Nasdaq Composite fell 22% over the same span.</p><p>Burg doesn&#39;t consider himself a big Tesla bear. He&#39;s says he is bearish on the overall economy and the consumer. He expects Tesla stock to struggle, but just like any other consumer discretionary stock this coming year.</p><p>The whole episode does illustrate an important lesson about options trading. There are many ways to use options in a portfolio.</p><p>Investors can buy options contracts far from current prices. They are cheap and only pay off if extreme events happen. They can also be used to bet on volatility. Options get more valuable as stock volatility rises and less valuable when volatility falls. Options can be used to hedge a portfolio, too.</p><p>What&#39;s more, bearish options bets can actually generate income for bullish investors. Take Tesla. It doesn&#39;t pay a dividend. If that irks some shareholders they can sell call options contracts. (Selling a call is similar to a put option. Both work out if the stock falls. It&#39;s a bearish bet.)</p><p>A Tesla holder selling a $900 call option that expires in September gets about $44. That&#39;s almost 5% the value of the Tesla stock. The risk with selling call options against stock held is that the stock could go up. If Tesla hit $1,000, that holder would have essentially sold some of his position for $900, missing out on the additional gain.</p><p>There are many other things pros do with options. People have careers trading options for brokerage firms and asset managers.</p><p>However, options don&#39;t indicate with certainty how someone feels about the stock that underlies the options contract.</p></body></html>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>No, There Is No New Short-Selling Champion in Tesla Stock</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nNo, There Is No New Short-Selling Champion in Tesla Stock\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-08-21 09:30 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.barrons.com/articles/tesla-stock-short-selling-51660942310?mod=RTA><strong>Barrons</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>There was a stir in the Tesla investing community when a regulator filing indicated that asset manager Deer Park Road made a seemingly huge bet against Tesla stock using put options. The stir is just ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/tesla-stock-short-selling-51660942310?mod=RTA\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/tesla-stock-short-selling-51660942310?mod=RTA","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2260785313","content_text":"There was a stir in the Tesla investing community when a regulator filing indicated that asset manager Deer Park Road made a seemingly huge bet against Tesla stock using put options. The stir is just a tempest in a teapot. There is no new short-selling champion for Tesla bears to hoist onto their shoulders.A put option is, generally speaking, a bearish bet. It gives the holder the right to sell a stock at a fixed price in the future. Holders of put options do better the lower a stock price falls.A quarterly regulatory filing indicated that Deer Park had amassed put-option contracts representing more than 4.8 million shares of Tesla (ticker: TSLA) stock. That much Tesla stock is worth roughly $4.3 billion at current prices. On the surface that looks like a massive bet.But that isn't really the way options work. The price paid for an options contract depends on many factors including the strike price and time to contract expiration.Consider Tesla put options that expire Friday Aug. 19, and give the holder the right to sell Tesla stock at about $800 a share are essentially trading for about one cent. Theoretically, amassing options contracts that reflect 4.8 million shares of Tesla could cost someone $48,000. That's a long way from $4.3 billion.It wouldn't be a good idea, though. There isn't high probability that Tesla stock will drop about $100 in the final hour of trading Friday.(There isn't much trading volume in those contracts. It's just an example.)Deer Park Chief Investment Officer Scott Burg told Barron's the Tesla put-options position amounted to 0.1% of his portfolio. That isn't all that much, and indicates Deer Park probably paid the less than $1 per share represented the puts.That isn't a lot for a stock worth about $900. That also means the put options were either expiring soon, or deeply out of the money, or both. Burg didn't get into contract specifics, but said the position was closed profitably. The tiny position is already gone.Profits aren't hard to fathom. Tesla stock did fall, along with other technology shares, in the second quarter. Tesla stock dropped almost 38% from the end of March to the end of June while the Nasdaq Composite fell 22% over the same span.Burg doesn't consider himself a big Tesla bear. He's says he is bearish on the overall economy and the consumer. He expects Tesla stock to struggle, but just like any other consumer discretionary stock this coming year.The whole episode does illustrate an important lesson about options trading. There are many ways to use options in a portfolio.Investors can buy options contracts far from current prices. They are cheap and only pay off if extreme events happen. They can also be used to bet on volatility. Options get more valuable as stock volatility rises and less valuable when volatility falls. Options can be used to hedge a portfolio, too.What's more, bearish options bets can actually generate income for bullish investors. Take Tesla. It doesn't pay a dividend. If that irks some shareholders they can sell call options contracts. (Selling a call is similar to a put option. Both work out if the stock falls. It's a bearish bet.)A Tesla holder selling a $900 call option that expires in September gets about $44. That's almost 5% the value of the Tesla stock. The risk with selling call options against stock held is that the stock could go up. If Tesla hit $1,000, that holder would have essentially sold some of his position for $900, missing out on the additional gain.There are many other things pros do with options. People have careers trading options for brokerage firms and asset managers.However, options don't indicate with certainty how someone feels about the stock that underlies the options contract.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":547,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9998669858,"gmtCreate":1660982500777,"gmtModify":1676536435164,"author":{"id":"3574915362300502","authorId":"3574915362300502","name":"Thunderbird","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/86528f4fb847fbbf69680f5b0c603119","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574915362300502","authorIdStr":"3574915362300502"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Even Elon musk is selling Tesla, is there somethingwe don't know?","listText":"Even Elon musk is selling Tesla, is there somethingwe don't know?","text":"Even Elon musk is selling Tesla, is there somethingwe don't know?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9998669858","repostId":"2260345221","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2260345221","pubTimestamp":1661043639,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2260345221?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-08-21 09:00","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Own Tesla Stock? You'll Have More Shares After the Stock Split","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2260345221","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Tesla's 3-for-1 stock split will take place at the close of trading on August 24, but you don't have to wait to determine how many shares you'll have in your account after the big day.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>Tesla</b> is joining its tech peers in a stock split this year. At the close of trading on August 24th, the electric vehicle maker will proceed with a 3-for-1 stock split.</p><p>If this is the first stock split you&#39;re participating in, we&#39;ll give you the scoop on how stock splits work and how many shares you can expect to have in your account.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/21f5974b9fb9775a06b2ede4da1d47a3\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Image source: Getty Images.</span></p><h2>Welcome to the world of stock splits</h2><p>Tesla isn&#39;t the first company to do a stock split in 2022 and probably won&#39;t be the last. Amazon and Google&#39;s parent Alphabet both completed 20-for-1 stock splits this year, pulling down the price of each individual share from a 4-figure price tag to 3-figures.</p><p>A stock split multiplies the number of shares that a company has outstanding. It does this by dividing a company&#39;s shares into additional shares. This lowers a company&#39;s share price and makes shares prices more affordable for the average investor.</p><p>You can think of a stock split like exchanging a $50 bill for five 10-dollar bills. Although the switch leaves you with more bills in your hand, the total value of your money adds up to the same amount. That&#39;s how a stock split works. You won&#39;t have more money in your account after the stock split, just more shares. If Tesla&#39;s stock is trading at $900 before the stock split, each share will be worth $300 after a 3-for-1 stock split. It all adds up to $900 worth of Tesla stock.</p><h2>How many shares of Tesla will you own after the stock split?</h2><p>You don&#39;t have to wait until the day of Tesla&#39;s stock split to figure out how many shares of stock you will own. Since the shareholders approved a 3-for-1 stock split at the 2022 annual shareholders meeting, you can run the numbers to figure out how many shares you will receive.</p><p>Below, we use Tesla&#39;s 3-for-1 ratio to calculate how many shares you&#39;ll own after August 24. The numbers on the left represent the number of shares you might have had on record as of August 17. The numbers on the right show how your shares will multiply after the stock split.</p><ul><li>1 share of Tesla stock = 3 shares</li><li>5 shares of Tesla stock = 15 shares</li><li>10 shares of Tesla stock = 30 shares</li><li>15 shares of Tesla stock = 45 shares</li><li>20 shares of Tesla stock = 60 shares</li></ul><p>If you never purchased a whole share of Tesla, that&#39;s not a problem. Shareholders with fractional shares will also see a difference in their account. You just need to calculate how many whole shares or partial shares you&#39;ll have after a 3-for-1 stock split based on your current fractional shares.</p><p>But if you participated in Tesla&#39;s last stock split in August 2020, you probably know how it all works. Let&#39;s say you had one share of Tesla before the 5-for-1 stock split. That one share would have turned into five shares in 2020. Now those five shares will turn into 15 shares after the stock split this month.</p><h2>More shares doesn&#39;t mean more profits</h2><p>The thought of more shares flowing into your account can be exciting. But don&#39;t confuse the number of shares with the value of your stocks. A stock split doesn&#39;t alter a company&#39;s total market capitalization or value. It divides shares into bite-sized pieces so that shares can trade at a lower price. The overall value of your shares will remain the same after a stock split.</p><p>So, if you&#39;re searching for long-term profits, make sure you do your research, focus on the fundamentals, and keep your eyes on high-quality businesses. Knowing that you have a good business in your portfolio can make a stock split a bit sweeter.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Own Tesla Stock? You'll Have More Shares After the Stock Split</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nOwn Tesla Stock? You'll Have More Shares After the Stock Split\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-08-21 09:00 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/08/19/own-tesla-stock-youll-have-more-shares-after-the-s/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Tesla is joining its tech peers in a stock split this year. At the close of trading on August 24th, the electric vehicle maker will proceed with a 3-for-1 stock split.If this is the first stock split ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/08/19/own-tesla-stock-youll-have-more-shares-after-the-s/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/08/19/own-tesla-stock-youll-have-more-shares-after-the-s/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2260345221","content_text":"Tesla is joining its tech peers in a stock split this year. At the close of trading on August 24th, the electric vehicle maker will proceed with a 3-for-1 stock split.If this is the first stock split you're participating in, we'll give you the scoop on how stock splits work and how many shares you can expect to have in your account.Image source: Getty Images.Welcome to the world of stock splitsTesla isn't the first company to do a stock split in 2022 and probably won't be the last. Amazon and Google's parent Alphabet both completed 20-for-1 stock splits this year, pulling down the price of each individual share from a 4-figure price tag to 3-figures.A stock split multiplies the number of shares that a company has outstanding. It does this by dividing a company's shares into additional shares. This lowers a company's share price and makes shares prices more affordable for the average investor.You can think of a stock split like exchanging a $50 bill for five 10-dollar bills. Although the switch leaves you with more bills in your hand, the total value of your money adds up to the same amount. That's how a stock split works. You won't have more money in your account after the stock split, just more shares. If Tesla's stock is trading at $900 before the stock split, each share will be worth $300 after a 3-for-1 stock split. It all adds up to $900 worth of Tesla stock.How many shares of Tesla will you own after the stock split?You don't have to wait until the day of Tesla's stock split to figure out how many shares of stock you will own. Since the shareholders approved a 3-for-1 stock split at the 2022 annual shareholders meeting, you can run the numbers to figure out how many shares you will receive.Below, we use Tesla's 3-for-1 ratio to calculate how many shares you'll own after August 24. The numbers on the left represent the number of shares you might have had on record as of August 17. The numbers on the right show how your shares will multiply after the stock split.1 share of Tesla stock = 3 shares5 shares of Tesla stock = 15 shares10 shares of Tesla stock = 30 shares15 shares of Tesla stock = 45 shares20 shares of Tesla stock = 60 sharesIf you never purchased a whole share of Tesla, that's not a problem. Shareholders with fractional shares will also see a difference in their account. You just need to calculate how many whole shares or partial shares you'll have after a 3-for-1 stock split based on your current fractional shares.But if you participated in Tesla's last stock split in August 2020, you probably know how it all works. Let's say you had one share of Tesla before the 5-for-1 stock split. That one share would have turned into five shares in 2020. Now those five shares will turn into 15 shares after the stock split this month.More shares doesn't mean more profitsThe thought of more shares flowing into your account can be exciting. But don't confuse the number of shares with the value of your stocks. A stock split doesn't alter a company's total market capitalization or value. It divides shares into bite-sized pieces so that shares can trade at a lower price. The overall value of your shares will remain the same after a stock split.So, if you're searching for long-term profits, make sure you do your research, focus on the fundamentals, and keep your eyes on high-quality businesses. Knowing that you have a good business in your portfolio can make a stock split a bit sweeter.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":419,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9998394548,"gmtCreate":1660934855688,"gmtModify":1676536425485,"author":{"id":"3574915362300502","authorId":"3574915362300502","name":"Thunderbird","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/86528f4fb847fbbf69680f5b0c603119","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574915362300502","authorIdStr":"3574915362300502"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Thanks for sharing","listText":"Thanks for sharing","text":"Thanks for sharing","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9998394548","repostId":"9998396753","repostType":1,"repost":{"id":9998396753,"gmtCreate":1660932849775,"gmtModify":1676536425287,"author":{"id":"4116209035887102","authorId":"4116209035887102","name":"amroui","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/bb03dc92b3df3a11ddb8660dbf7eb694","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4116209035887102","authorIdStr":"4116209035887102"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/OPT/NVTS 20220916 7.5 PUT\">$NVTS 20220916 7.5 PUT$</a> market downtrend&nbsp;saving me&nbsp;now haha.. wonder if I should cut loss or hold out to break even (or maybe even profit?)&nbsp;[Thinking]&nbsp;[Sly]&nbsp;<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/NVTS\">$Navitas Semiconductor Corp(NVTS)$</a> postedsome solid news during its recent earnings. Can't believe it's only been 4 days. Feels like a long time ago. Doesn't look like it'll go back below $6.. i'd buy to hold if it does go back down that low haha&nbsp;[Happy]&nbsp;","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/OPT/NVTS 20220916 7.5 PUT\">$NVTS 20220916 7.5 PUT$</a> market downtrend&nbsp;saving me&nbsp;now haha.. wonder if I should cut loss or hold out to break even (or maybe even profit?)&nbsp;[Thinking]&nbsp;[Sly]&nbsp;<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/NVTS\">$Navitas Semiconductor Corp(NVTS)$</a> postedsome solid news during its recent earnings. Can't believe it's only been 4 days. Feels like a long time ago. Doesn't look like it'll go back below $6.. i'd buy to hold if it does go back down that low haha&nbsp;[Happy]&nbsp;","text":"$NVTS 20220916 7.5 PUT$ market downtrend saving me now haha.. wonder if I should cut loss or hold out to break even (or maybe even profit?) [Thinking] [Sly] $Navitas Semiconductor Corp(NVTS)$ postedsome solid news during its recent earnings. Can't believe it's only been 4 days. Feels like a long time ago. Doesn't look like it'll go back below $6.. i'd buy to hold if it does go back down that low haha [Happy]","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/8d138c21eb01e7c0f7c805e478719357","width":"1170","height":"2292"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9998396753","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":0,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":264,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9991486365,"gmtCreate":1660870677459,"gmtModify":1676536414760,"author":{"id":"3574915362300502","authorId":"3574915362300502","name":"Thunderbird","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/86528f4fb847fbbf69680f5b0c603119","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574915362300502","authorIdStr":"3574915362300502"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Another rate hike coming! 0.75!","listText":"Another rate hike coming! 0.75!","text":"Another rate hike coming! 0.75!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9991486365","repostId":"2260357839","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2260357839","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1660866281,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2260357839?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-08-19 07:44","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Fed's Bullard Leans Toward Favoring 0.75-Percentage-Point September Rate Rise","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2260357839","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis President James Bullard said Thursday he is considering support fo","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis President James Bullard said Thursday he is considering support for another large rate rise at the central bank&#39;s policy meeting next month and added he isn&#39;t ready to say the economy has seen the worst of the inflation surge.</p><p>&#34;We should continue to move expeditiously to a level of the policy rate that will put significant downward pressure on inflation&#34; and &#34;I don&#39;t really see why you want to drag out interest rate increases into next year,&#34; Mr. Bullard said in a Wall Street Journal interview.</p><p>When it comes to the Fed&#39;s next move on interest rates, Mr. Bullard said of next month&#39;s Federal Open Market Committee meeting that &#34;I would lean toward the 75 basis points at this point. Again, I think we&#39;ve got relatively good reads on the economy, and we&#39;ve got very high inflation, so I think it would make sense to continue to get the policy rate higher and into restrictive territory.&#34;</p><p>Mr. Bullard is a voting member of the FOMC this year. Since March, the Fed has embarked on an increasingly aggressive path of rate rises to lower inflation from levels that are at 40-year highs. After lifting rates from near-zero levels in March, the central bank shifted to 0.75-percentage-point rate increases at its June and July meetings, and now has its overnight target rate in a range of 2.25% to 2.5%.</p><p>The FOMC next meets Sept. 20-21. Recent data hinting at a possible waning in inflation pressures, as well as comments by some central bankers, have generated a debate among market participants as to whether the central bank can slow the pace of rate rise into the end of the year.</p><p>Mr. Bullard said he isn&#39;t ready to say inflation has peaked and it remains important for the Fed to get its target rate to a range of 3.75% to 4% by year-end, before the central bank can consider what it will need to do next year. He also said that he sees about an 18-month process of getting price pressures back to the Fed&#39;s 2% target, and predicted that path will likely be uneven, while adding, &#34;We&#39;ve got a long way to go to get inflation under control.&#34;</p><p>&#34;The idea that inflation has peaked is, is a hope, but it&#39;s not statistically really in the data at this point,&#34; Mr. Bullard said. &#34;I&#39;m hopeful&#34; the worst of the inflation surge has passed, he said, though he added he expects high inflation &#34;to prove more persistent than what many parts of Wall Street think.&#34;</p><p>What&#39;s more, Mr. Bullard said he believes growth in the second half will be stronger than the apparent weakness seen over the first six months of the year, and he believes the job market will stay robust as well.</p><p>&#34;There&#39;s just a lot to like about the labor market&#34; and it&#39;s possible unemployment may tick down a touch further from the 3.5% reading seen in the July data, he said. Mr. Bullard said unemployment could even rise and still herald a robust labor sector, because an unemployment rate that has a neutral impact on price pressures is likely in the 4% range.</p><p>Mr. Bullard said that market speculation over rate cuts is &#34;definitely premature&#34; and that fears the economy may fall into a downturn are overblown.</p><p>The veteran central banker played down indications that financial-market conditions have been easing even as the central bank presses forward with rate increases. Tighter monetary policy is supposed to increase restraint in the economy in large part through its impact on asset prices, so an easing there in theory could force the Fed to be even more aggressive with future changes in the federal-funds rate.</p><p>Mr. Bullard said it&#39;s possible stock prices are giving a false impression of the state of asset prices.</p><p>&#34;One thing about financial conditions that I&#39;m steadfast about is, I don&#39;t like financial conditions indexes that put too much weight on equity pricing. Equity prices, you know, can be far from fundamentals for certain stocks,&#34; and company shares aren&#39;t a big driver of how the Fed thinks about future monetary policy choices, he said.</p><p>In a separate appearance Thursday, Minneapolis Fed leader Neel Kashkari said an economic downturn is one risk of the Fed&#39;s current policy path.</p><p>&#34;I don&#39;t think we&#39;re in a recession right now,&#34; he said. &#34;But as we continue to raise rates, as we continue to raise costs, so to speak, of borrowing across the economy, it should be putting, tapping the brakes on the U.S. economy, and that makes it more likely that we would end up in a recession.&#34;</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Fed's Bullard Leans Toward Favoring 0.75-Percentage-Point September Rate Rise</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFed's Bullard Leans Toward Favoring 0.75-Percentage-Point September Rate Rise\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-08-19 07:44</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis President James Bullard said Thursday he is considering support for another large rate rise at the central bank&#39;s policy meeting next month and added he isn&#39;t ready to say the economy has seen the worst of the inflation surge.</p><p>&#34;We should continue to move expeditiously to a level of the policy rate that will put significant downward pressure on inflation&#34; and &#34;I don&#39;t really see why you want to drag out interest rate increases into next year,&#34; Mr. Bullard said in a Wall Street Journal interview.</p><p>When it comes to the Fed&#39;s next move on interest rates, Mr. Bullard said of next month&#39;s Federal Open Market Committee meeting that &#34;I would lean toward the 75 basis points at this point. Again, I think we&#39;ve got relatively good reads on the economy, and we&#39;ve got very high inflation, so I think it would make sense to continue to get the policy rate higher and into restrictive territory.&#34;</p><p>Mr. Bullard is a voting member of the FOMC this year. Since March, the Fed has embarked on an increasingly aggressive path of rate rises to lower inflation from levels that are at 40-year highs. After lifting rates from near-zero levels in March, the central bank shifted to 0.75-percentage-point rate increases at its June and July meetings, and now has its overnight target rate in a range of 2.25% to 2.5%.</p><p>The FOMC next meets Sept. 20-21. Recent data hinting at a possible waning in inflation pressures, as well as comments by some central bankers, have generated a debate among market participants as to whether the central bank can slow the pace of rate rise into the end of the year.</p><p>Mr. Bullard said he isn&#39;t ready to say inflation has peaked and it remains important for the Fed to get its target rate to a range of 3.75% to 4% by year-end, before the central bank can consider what it will need to do next year. He also said that he sees about an 18-month process of getting price pressures back to the Fed&#39;s 2% target, and predicted that path will likely be uneven, while adding, &#34;We&#39;ve got a long way to go to get inflation under control.&#34;</p><p>&#34;The idea that inflation has peaked is, is a hope, but it&#39;s not statistically really in the data at this point,&#34; Mr. Bullard said. &#34;I&#39;m hopeful&#34; the worst of the inflation surge has passed, he said, though he added he expects high inflation &#34;to prove more persistent than what many parts of Wall Street think.&#34;</p><p>What&#39;s more, Mr. Bullard said he believes growth in the second half will be stronger than the apparent weakness seen over the first six months of the year, and he believes the job market will stay robust as well.</p><p>&#34;There&#39;s just a lot to like about the labor market&#34; and it&#39;s possible unemployment may tick down a touch further from the 3.5% reading seen in the July data, he said. Mr. Bullard said unemployment could even rise and still herald a robust labor sector, because an unemployment rate that has a neutral impact on price pressures is likely in the 4% range.</p><p>Mr. Bullard said that market speculation over rate cuts is &#34;definitely premature&#34; and that fears the economy may fall into a downturn are overblown.</p><p>The veteran central banker played down indications that financial-market conditions have been easing even as the central bank presses forward with rate increases. Tighter monetary policy is supposed to increase restraint in the economy in large part through its impact on asset prices, so an easing there in theory could force the Fed to be even more aggressive with future changes in the federal-funds rate.</p><p>Mr. Bullard said it&#39;s possible stock prices are giving a false impression of the state of asset prices.</p><p>&#34;One thing about financial conditions that I&#39;m steadfast about is, I don&#39;t like financial conditions indexes that put too much weight on equity pricing. Equity prices, you know, can be far from fundamentals for certain stocks,&#34; and company shares aren&#39;t a big driver of how the Fed thinks about future monetary policy choices, he said.</p><p>In a separate appearance Thursday, Minneapolis Fed leader Neel Kashkari said an economic downturn is one risk of the Fed&#39;s current policy path.</p><p>&#34;I don&#39;t think we&#39;re in a recession right now,&#34; he said. &#34;But as we continue to raise rates, as we continue to raise costs, so to speak, of borrowing across the economy, it should be putting, tapping the brakes on the U.S. economy, and that makes it more likely that we would end up in a recession.&#34;</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2260357839","content_text":"Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis President James Bullard said Thursday he is considering support for another large rate rise at the central bank's policy meeting next month and added he isn't ready to say the economy has seen the worst of the inflation surge.\"We should continue to move expeditiously to a level of the policy rate that will put significant downward pressure on inflation\" and \"I don't really see why you want to drag out interest rate increases into next year,\" Mr. Bullard said in a Wall Street Journal interview.When it comes to the Fed's next move on interest rates, Mr. Bullard said of next month's Federal Open Market Committee meeting that \"I would lean toward the 75 basis points at this point. Again, I think we've got relatively good reads on the economy, and we've got very high inflation, so I think it would make sense to continue to get the policy rate higher and into restrictive territory.\"Mr. Bullard is a voting member of the FOMC this year. Since March, the Fed has embarked on an increasingly aggressive path of rate rises to lower inflation from levels that are at 40-year highs. After lifting rates from near-zero levels in March, the central bank shifted to 0.75-percentage-point rate increases at its June and July meetings, and now has its overnight target rate in a range of 2.25% to 2.5%.The FOMC next meets Sept. 20-21. Recent data hinting at a possible waning in inflation pressures, as well as comments by some central bankers, have generated a debate among market participants as to whether the central bank can slow the pace of rate rise into the end of the year.Mr. Bullard said he isn't ready to say inflation has peaked and it remains important for the Fed to get its target rate to a range of 3.75% to 4% by year-end, before the central bank can consider what it will need to do next year. He also said that he sees about an 18-month process of getting price pressures back to the Fed's 2% target, and predicted that path will likely be uneven, while adding, \"We've got a long way to go to get inflation under control.\"\"The idea that inflation has peaked is, is a hope, but it's not statistically really in the data at this point,\" Mr. Bullard said. \"I'm hopeful\" the worst of the inflation surge has passed, he said, though he added he expects high inflation \"to prove more persistent than what many parts of Wall Street think.\"What's more, Mr. Bullard said he believes growth in the second half will be stronger than the apparent weakness seen over the first six months of the year, and he believes the job market will stay robust as well.\"There's just a lot to like about the labor market\" and it's possible unemployment may tick down a touch further from the 3.5% reading seen in the July data, he said. Mr. Bullard said unemployment could even rise and still herald a robust labor sector, because an unemployment rate that has a neutral impact on price pressures is likely in the 4% range.Mr. Bullard said that market speculation over rate cuts is \"definitely premature\" and that fears the economy may fall into a downturn are overblown.The veteran central banker played down indications that financial-market conditions have been easing even as the central bank presses forward with rate increases. Tighter monetary policy is supposed to increase restraint in the economy in large part through its impact on asset prices, so an easing there in theory could force the Fed to be even more aggressive with future changes in the federal-funds rate.Mr. Bullard said it's possible stock prices are giving a false impression of the state of asset prices.\"One thing about financial conditions that I'm steadfast about is, I don't like financial conditions indexes that put too much weight on equity pricing. Equity prices, you know, can be far from fundamentals for certain stocks,\" and company shares aren't a big driver of how the Fed thinks about future monetary policy choices, he said.In a separate appearance Thursday, Minneapolis Fed leader Neel Kashkari said an economic downturn is one risk of the Fed's current policy path.\"I don't think we're in a recession right now,\" he said. \"But as we continue to raise rates, as we continue to raise costs, so to speak, of borrowing across the economy, it should be putting, tapping the brakes on the U.S. economy, and that makes it more likely that we would end up in a recession.\"","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":213,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9991164762,"gmtCreate":1660791228358,"gmtModify":1676536400583,"author":{"id":"3574915362300502","authorId":"3574915362300502","name":"Thunderbird","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/86528f4fb847fbbf69680f5b0c603119","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574915362300502","authorIdStr":"3574915362300502"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Rate is quite high now already. Dun need to slow, just stop.","listText":"Rate is quite high now already. Dun need to slow, just stop.","text":"Rate is quite high now already. Dun need to slow, just stop.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9991164762","repostId":"1196990768","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1196990768","pubTimestamp":1660777736,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1196990768?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-08-18 07:08","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Fed Officials Saw Need to Slow Rate-Hike Pace “At Some Point”","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1196990768","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"Many participants saw risk of over-tightening policyOfficials saw significant risk of entrenched inf","content":"<html><head></head><body><ul><li>Many participants saw risk of over-tightening policy</li><li>Officials saw significant risk of entrenched inflation</li></ul><p>Federal Reserve officials agreed last month on the need to eventually dial back the pace of interest-rate hikes but also wanted to gauge how their monetary tightening was working toward curbing US inflation.</p><p>“As the stance of monetary policy tightened further, it likely would become appropriate at some point to slow the pace of policy rate increases while assessing the effects of cumulative policy adjustments on economic activity and inflation,” according to minutes of the Federal Open Market Committee’s July 26-27 meeting released Wednesday in Washington.</p><p>“Many participants remarked that, in view of the constantly changing nature of the economic environment and the existence of long and variable lags in monetary policy’s effect on the economy, there was also a risk that the committee could tighten the stance of policy by more than necessary to restore price stability,” the minutes showed.</p><p>Fed officials raised their benchmark interest rate by 75 basis points at that meeting for a second straight month, marking the fastest pace of tightening since the early 1980s in a battle against red-hot inflation.</p><p>Even so, the S&amp;P 500 index of US stocks has risen about 9% since the July gathering. Fed officials will have a chance to offer fresh views on the outlook during their Aug. 25-27 retreat in Jackson Hole, Wyoming.</p><p>Following the minutes release, two-year Treasury yields and the dollar pared gains, while US stocks trimmed losses. Swaps traders increasingly bet that the Fed will boost rates by a half percentage point next month, rather than three-quarters of a point.</p><p>“While the FOMC minutes continue to emphasize the need to contain inflation, there is also an emerging concern the Fed could tighten more than necessary,” said Christopher Low, chief economist at FHN Financial. “There is an inkling of improvement on the supply side of the economy, there is a bit of hope in some product prices moderating, but there is still a great deal of concern about inflation and inflation expectations.”</p><p>The language used in the minutes echoed what Powell said at the press conference after the July meeting. His comments ignited the move higher in stocks when he suggested that the central bank could transition to smaller rate hikes going forward. Even so, he left the door open to another “unusually large” increase at the next meeting in September, depending on economic data to be published in the interim.</p><p>A Labor Department report published Aug. 5 -- which showed companies added 528,000 employees to payrolls last month, more than double what forecasters were expecting -- prompted investors to bet on a third straight 75-basis-point hike when the Fed meets Sept. 20-21.</p><p>At the July meeting, “participants judged that a significant risk facing the committee was that elevated inflation could become entrenched if the public began to question the committee’s resolve to adjust the stance of policy sufficiently,” according to the minutes.</p><p>But the department’s Aug. 10 readout on consumer prices showed they rose 8.5% in the 12 months through July, down from the 9.1% increase the month before that marked the highest inflation rate since 1981.</p><p>The softer July inflation figures gave legs to the stock-market rally as previous bets on a big rate hike in September were unwound, and investors are now assigning similar odds to a half-point or a three-quarter-point increase, according to prices of futures contracts tied to the Fed’s benchmark rate.</p><p>August numbers on jobs and consumer prices are due out before the September meeting.</p></body></html>","source":"lsy1584095487587","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Fed Officials Saw Need to Slow Rate-Hike Pace “At Some Point”</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFed Officials Saw Need to Slow Rate-Hike Pace “At Some Point”\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-08-18 07:08 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-08-17/fed-saw-smaller-hikes-ahead-to-assess-prior-moves-minutes-show?srnd=premium><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Many participants saw risk of over-tightening policyOfficials saw significant risk of entrenched inflationFederal Reserve officials agreed last month on the need to eventually dial back the pace of ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-08-17/fed-saw-smaller-hikes-ahead-to-assess-prior-moves-minutes-show?srnd=premium\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".DJI":"道琼斯",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index"},"source_url":"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-08-17/fed-saw-smaller-hikes-ahead-to-assess-prior-moves-minutes-show?srnd=premium","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1196990768","content_text":"Many participants saw risk of over-tightening policyOfficials saw significant risk of entrenched inflationFederal Reserve officials agreed last month on the need to eventually dial back the pace of interest-rate hikes but also wanted to gauge how their monetary tightening was working toward curbing US inflation.“As the stance of monetary policy tightened further, it likely would become appropriate at some point to slow the pace of policy rate increases while assessing the effects of cumulative policy adjustments on economic activity and inflation,” according to minutes of the Federal Open Market Committee’s July 26-27 meeting released Wednesday in Washington.“Many participants remarked that, in view of the constantly changing nature of the economic environment and the existence of long and variable lags in monetary policy’s effect on the economy, there was also a risk that the committee could tighten the stance of policy by more than necessary to restore price stability,” the minutes showed.Fed officials raised their benchmark interest rate by 75 basis points at that meeting for a second straight month, marking the fastest pace of tightening since the early 1980s in a battle against red-hot inflation.Even so, the S&P 500 index of US stocks has risen about 9% since the July gathering. Fed officials will have a chance to offer fresh views on the outlook during their Aug. 25-27 retreat in Jackson Hole, Wyoming.Following the minutes release, two-year Treasury yields and the dollar pared gains, while US stocks trimmed losses. Swaps traders increasingly bet that the Fed will boost rates by a half percentage point next month, rather than three-quarters of a point.“While the FOMC minutes continue to emphasize the need to contain inflation, there is also an emerging concern the Fed could tighten more than necessary,” said Christopher Low, chief economist at FHN Financial. “There is an inkling of improvement on the supply side of the economy, there is a bit of hope in some product prices moderating, but there is still a great deal of concern about inflation and inflation expectations.”The language used in the minutes echoed what Powell said at the press conference after the July meeting. His comments ignited the move higher in stocks when he suggested that the central bank could transition to smaller rate hikes going forward. Even so, he left the door open to another “unusually large” increase at the next meeting in September, depending on economic data to be published in the interim.A Labor Department report published Aug. 5 -- which showed companies added 528,000 employees to payrolls last month, more than double what forecasters were expecting -- prompted investors to bet on a third straight 75-basis-point hike when the Fed meets Sept. 20-21.At the July meeting, “participants judged that a significant risk facing the committee was that elevated inflation could become entrenched if the public began to question the committee’s resolve to adjust the stance of policy sufficiently,” according to the minutes.But the department’s Aug. 10 readout on consumer prices showed they rose 8.5% in the 12 months through July, down from the 9.1% increase the month before that marked the highest inflation rate since 1981.The softer July inflation figures gave legs to the stock-market rally as previous bets on a big rate hike in September were unwound, and investors are now assigning similar odds to a half-point or a three-quarter-point increase, according to prices of futures contracts tied to the Fed’s benchmark rate.August numbers on jobs and consumer prices are due out before the September meeting.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":216,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9991164563,"gmtCreate":1660791179454,"gmtModify":1676536400575,"author":{"id":"3574915362300502","authorId":"3574915362300502","name":"Thunderbird","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/86528f4fb847fbbf69680f5b0c603119","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574915362300502","authorIdStr":"3574915362300502"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Thanks for sharing&nbsp;","listText":"Thanks for sharing&nbsp;","text":"Thanks for sharing","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9991164563","repostId":"2260828546","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2260828546","pubTimestamp":1660789962,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2260828546?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-08-18 10:32","market":"us","language":"en","title":"The Pros And Cons Of Investing In Tesla Stock","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2260828546","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"SummaryTesla is unique in its ability to foster tribal loyalty and opposition amongst the investor community.We simply assess it as we would any other stock - consider the financial fundamentals of th","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>Summary</b></p><ul><li>Tesla is unique in its ability to foster tribal loyalty and opposition amongst the investor community.</li><li>We simply assess it as we would any other stock - consider the financial fundamentals of the company, and consider the emotional behavior of the stock.</li><li>We remain of the view that Tesla can move up strongly from here, and we rate the stock at Accumulate accordingly.</li></ul><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cd646daa99c5f24b2cfbb7b48ae2d49e\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"617\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>MF3d</span></p><p>Forget That It&#39;s Called Tesla, Just Look At The Numbers And The Chart - Then Decide</p><p>A blessing and a curse has accompanied Tesla stock since knowledge of the name migrated beyond the tonier parts of Atherton and into the wider American investor community. And that blessing, that curse, is hoopla. Never a dull moment it seems. New products announced<i>way</i>before they can be manufactured at any kind of scale, new features announced before the underlying technology is viable, Twitter feuds, a feud<i>with</i>Twitter, it&#39;s exhausting.</p><p>Fortunately help is at hand. Want to get to grips with owning Tesla stock and working out whether that is a good idea for your capital or not? Just ignore all the hyperbole. Ignore all the Musk sideshows and ignore all the Musk fanbois and Musk haters. Because none of it matters. What matters is the same as matters for all stocks. In no particular order, one, the fundamental financial performance of the underlying company and, two, the emotive chart performance of the stock.</p><p>Let&#39;s first turn to Tesla&#39;s fundamental financial performance.</p><p><b>TSLA Financials - Key Metrics</b></p><p>Here are the numbers up to and including its Q2 report.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8250693e10d20012fb7ff39dfecb3ded\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"409\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>TSLA Financials (TSLA SEC Filings, YCharts.com, Cestrian Analysis)</span></p><p>Growth slowed in Q2 due to some combination of China Covid lockdowns, component supply shortages, and no doubt a modest demand hiatus influenced by inflation and recession fears in the US. In Q3 we want to see the company evidence no worsening of growth, but for now, those are the numbers. So you have a business with $67bn of revenue growing that revenue base in the 60-70% pa. range, whilst achieving a low double-digit unlevered pretax free cashflow margin. That is a rare achievement indeed. That it is achieved by a company with a heavy manufacturing base is still more remarkable. The balance sheet is a fortress, with $14.5bn net cash keeping the wolf from the door.</p><p><b>Tesla Valuation</b></p><p>The market is asking you to pay 14x TTM revenue, 59x TTM EBITDA or 123x TTM unlevered pretax FCF for Tesla. It&#39;s hard to argue that on pure financial fundamentals that&#39;s a bargain. It&#39;s not. If it&#39;s free cashflow yield you are looking for, look elsewhere. But if it&#39;s a valuation that is threshold acceptable as support for the technical opportunity the chart affords you? Different story.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/30d528946a8f1b720fabad7236a73837\" tg-width=\"247\" tg-height=\"333\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>TSLA Valuation (YCharts.com, Cestrian Analysis)</span></p><p><b>Tesla Stock Chart</b></p><p>This is where things get really interesting from our perspective. Specifically<i>because</i>the company inspires such visceral reactions is what makes it an attractive stock. Whether you like to play it long or short, what you can count on with TSLA is volatility. Speaking for ourselves - both our professional ratings and our staff personal account holdings - we prefer to play TSLA long though we have dabbled with the occasional short position. Yes, it&#39;s true. You can in fact be emotion-neutral with TSLA if you don a lead helmet, ignore all opinions, switch off Twitter, and just deal with the facts and the chart in front of you.</p><p>Let&#39;s take a look at the chart in the larger degree.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/dee51e98999fe94fafb5c07e41c0b44f\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"294\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>TSLA Chart (TrendSpider, Cestrian Analysis)</span></p><p>Here&#39;s how we see the TSLA chart and its prospects.</p><p>From the 2019 lows, the stock puts in a 5-wave up sequence that peaks with the other growth names, and indeed the market at large, in late 2021. This 5-wave sequence tracked rather well to key Fibonacci levels. Let&#39;s zoom in for a moment just to show that. (Full page version of this chart).</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9157ed0a3de97357cd57a68b5845c6be\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"280\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>TSLA Chart II (TrendSpider)</span></p><p>The Wave 1 up retreats into a Wave 2 down troughing at the 0.786 retrace; textbook Wave 2. Then the Wave 3 - whilst a<i>huge</i>version thereof - peaks at precisely the 5.618 extension of the Wave 1. And so on. Now, the reason to show this is because it is evidence of the highly emotive nature of TSLA stock. Stocks don&#39;t move up to 5.618 extensions because the underlying company is growing quickly. They move up that far because they inspire all kinds of emotions to run high. And if a stock has generated that much investor emotion in the recent past, there&#39;s a good chance it does so in the near future, in our view. Which means we think that TSLA can trade well to Fibonacci levels going forward too.</p><p><b>Pros Of Buying Tesla Stock</b></p><p>The pros of buying Tesla stock are in our view:</p><p>1 - the stock trades unrestrained by fundamentals, unconstrained by the news, and instead moves purely with sentiment. This means that the level-headed investor or trader can take advantage of the crowd - and also,</p><p>2 - whilst it is true that other EVs are also available, Tesla&#39;s brand advantage and penchant for viral marketing means that the underlying fundamentals of the company do remain strong. That may change in the future; it may be that in the end Ford or GM swallow the beast as they did niche manufacturers a century back; but for now, Tesla remains the one to beat in EVs, and EVs remain the segment with the most consumer pull and government push.</p><p>Let&#39;s take a look at the pro case. Back to the charts in order to do so.</p><p>That 5-wave up sequence forms a larger-degree Wave One in our first chart above. Wave One starts in 2019 at around $45 (adjusted for the stock splits that have taken place since that time) and peaks late in 2021 at around $1,240. The larger-degree Wave Two that follows has bottomed out at a relatively shallow 0.5 retracement of that Wave One up. At first blush one could be forgiven for expecting a further drop - after all stock after stock has already put in 0.618 or 0.786 retracements of similar moves up. But that&#39;s rather the point. To our eye it looks like the 2022 bottom may well be in, because so many big-name stocks have bottomed out at those deep retracement levels. And we take that as evidence that maybe, <i>maybe</i>- TSLA has bottomed too.</p><p>If that&#39;s the case, and we&#39;re now in a larger-degree Wave Three up, then as a function of that nuts Wave One, technically - which is to say<i>emotionally -</i>we may reasonably expect the stock to run up from here to at least the top of the Wave 1 high, and more likely to the 100% extension of that Wave One. That means a bull target of $1,245 (minimum, if we&#39;re right) and a crazy ol&#39; bullrider target of $1,805 (that&#39;s the 100% extension). We don&#39;t need to talk about the fact that most likely a Wave Three terminates at the 1.618 extension of Wave One, because that would suggest a meth-addled crack-snorting bull target of $2,534, and, honestly? We don&#39;t have the time to handle all the comments if we slapped a $2,534 stock price target on the name. But, between us? The stock is perfectly capable of achieving that target, and the only reason to disbelieve the potential is if you have yet to free your mind, and you still think that stock prices are driven primarily by fundamentals or by the news. (If you want to apply some reverse neurolinguistic programming to that mental block, take a look at a post of ours from March this year.)</p><p><b>Cons Of Buying Tesla Stock</b></p><p>Well, this one is easy. Here&#39;s a bunch of reasons to not buy Tesla stock.</p><p>1 - The valuation. 122x unlevered pretax free cashflow. Give your grandparents a quick call and ask them whether they think you should buy a stock valued at 122x cashflow. (It will be a quick call).</p><p>2 - The hoopla. If you can&#39;t ignore the hoopla, if you are compelled to watch the Elon Musk show play out live on every media forum near you, well, that&#39;s exhausting, because if you&#39;re watching it then you can&#39;t help but wonder whether the latest move will undermine your investment in Tesla stock or not.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/27c40bee112220ca265e7260ecc25af6\" tg-width=\"543\" tg-height=\"199\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>The Latest (Twitter)</span></p><p>Is that good for TSLA stock? Bad for TSLA stock? Will it make no difference? You already spent too much time thinking about it. You see the problem with hoopla.</p><p>3 - The competition. It&#39;s not like Ford and VW and everyone gave up. They are behind, but spending like crazy and nobody likes a show-off, so, assume they have Tesla well in their sights.</p><p>4 - The share sales by Elon Musk. Whatever the logic, they don&#39;t build investor confidence.</p><p>The bear opinion on Tesla is mainly emotional and we think that is all best ignored. If you want to read a well-reasoned bear take on the name, read this Seeking Alpha article. The author vomited all over our last bull piece on Tesla and then wrote this, which is good work. We don&#39;t agree with the conclusions - but it&#39;s good work. Take a look.</p><p><b>Is Tesla Stock Worth Investing In?</b></p><p>In our long-run investment work we adopt the Wyckoff Cycle model. We aim to slowly accumulate a position in a stock when it is beaten down, stop buying once a certain price is reached, sit back in anticipation of the markup cycle then lifting the stock, and then distributing once a high is reached. We can&#39;t claim to do this perfectly of course, but it has worked pretty well for us through the recent Covid lows, 2020-2021 markup period and then into the 2021 highs. We sold a bunch of high beta names as their 5-wave cycles topped late last year, both in our <i>Growth Investor Pro</i>service and in staff personal accounts. Right now we have been through a period of &#39;accumulate&#39; ratings in many high beta names and we seem to be moving into a markup period. Tesla has yet to move up and out of our accumulation price zone. If you go back to that first chart above, we think a viable way to invest in Tesla without taking on undue risk is:</p><p>Accumulate - meaning build up slowly over time - a position in that green &#39;Accumulation Zone&#39; box - let&#39;s call it between $624-$902 (yes those numbers are odd boundaries to pick - they represent the Fibonacci levels that define the zone for us). If the stock does move up then you can either just wait for a Wave Three to play out and sell as it nears those targets, and/or set a trailing stop on the way up. If the stock flames out, we believe that stops set in the region below say $610 (that&#39;s a little below the recent lows) are protective without being likely to get executed on a whim. The stock remains inside our Accumulation zone so we rate the stock at, er, Accumulate.</p><p>We have invested in the stock in staff personal accounts; we rate the stock at Accumulate on a professional basis; and we think the risk-reward balance is good if you take an approach similar to the above. So for us? Yes, Tesla is worth investing in. But then we don&#39;t watch the hoopla and we wear lead helmets to work every day. You&#39;ll make the right decision for you, as always.</p><p><i>This article was written by Cestrian Capital Research. </i><i>This article is for reference only.</i></p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>The Pros And Cons Of Investing In Tesla Stock</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nThe Pros And Cons Of Investing In Tesla Stock\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-08-18 10:32 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4535187-pros-cons-investing-tesla-stock><strong>Seeking Alpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>SummaryTesla is unique in its ability to foster tribal loyalty and opposition amongst the investor community.We simply assess it as we would any other stock - consider the financial fundamentals of ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4535187-pros-cons-investing-tesla-stock\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4535187-pros-cons-investing-tesla-stock","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2260828546","content_text":"SummaryTesla is unique in its ability to foster tribal loyalty and opposition amongst the investor community.We simply assess it as we would any other stock - consider the financial fundamentals of the company, and consider the emotional behavior of the stock.We remain of the view that Tesla can move up strongly from here, and we rate the stock at Accumulate accordingly.MF3dForget That It's Called Tesla, Just Look At The Numbers And The Chart - Then DecideA blessing and a curse has accompanied Tesla stock since knowledge of the name migrated beyond the tonier parts of Atherton and into the wider American investor community. And that blessing, that curse, is hoopla. Never a dull moment it seems. New products announcedwaybefore they can be manufactured at any kind of scale, new features announced before the underlying technology is viable, Twitter feuds, a feudwithTwitter, it's exhausting.Fortunately help is at hand. Want to get to grips with owning Tesla stock and working out whether that is a good idea for your capital or not? Just ignore all the hyperbole. Ignore all the Musk sideshows and ignore all the Musk fanbois and Musk haters. Because none of it matters. What matters is the same as matters for all stocks. In no particular order, one, the fundamental financial performance of the underlying company and, two, the emotive chart performance of the stock.Let's first turn to Tesla's fundamental financial performance.TSLA Financials - Key MetricsHere are the numbers up to and including its Q2 report.TSLA Financials (TSLA SEC Filings, YCharts.com, Cestrian Analysis)Growth slowed in Q2 due to some combination of China Covid lockdowns, component supply shortages, and no doubt a modest demand hiatus influenced by inflation and recession fears in the US. In Q3 we want to see the company evidence no worsening of growth, but for now, those are the numbers. So you have a business with $67bn of revenue growing that revenue base in the 60-70% pa. range, whilst achieving a low double-digit unlevered pretax free cashflow margin. That is a rare achievement indeed. That it is achieved by a company with a heavy manufacturing base is still more remarkable. The balance sheet is a fortress, with $14.5bn net cash keeping the wolf from the door.Tesla ValuationThe market is asking you to pay 14x TTM revenue, 59x TTM EBITDA or 123x TTM unlevered pretax FCF for Tesla. It's hard to argue that on pure financial fundamentals that's a bargain. It's not. If it's free cashflow yield you are looking for, look elsewhere. But if it's a valuation that is threshold acceptable as support for the technical opportunity the chart affords you? Different story.TSLA Valuation (YCharts.com, Cestrian Analysis)Tesla Stock ChartThis is where things get really interesting from our perspective. Specificallybecausethe company inspires such visceral reactions is what makes it an attractive stock. Whether you like to play it long or short, what you can count on with TSLA is volatility. Speaking for ourselves - both our professional ratings and our staff personal account holdings - we prefer to play TSLA long though we have dabbled with the occasional short position. Yes, it's true. You can in fact be emotion-neutral with TSLA if you don a lead helmet, ignore all opinions, switch off Twitter, and just deal with the facts and the chart in front of you.Let's take a look at the chart in the larger degree.TSLA Chart (TrendSpider, Cestrian Analysis)Here's how we see the TSLA chart and its prospects.From the 2019 lows, the stock puts in a 5-wave up sequence that peaks with the other growth names, and indeed the market at large, in late 2021. This 5-wave sequence tracked rather well to key Fibonacci levels. Let's zoom in for a moment just to show that. (Full page version of this chart).TSLA Chart II (TrendSpider)The Wave 1 up retreats into a Wave 2 down troughing at the 0.786 retrace; textbook Wave 2. Then the Wave 3 - whilst ahugeversion thereof - peaks at precisely the 5.618 extension of the Wave 1. And so on. Now, the reason to show this is because it is evidence of the highly emotive nature of TSLA stock. Stocks don't move up to 5.618 extensions because the underlying company is growing quickly. They move up that far because they inspire all kinds of emotions to run high. And if a stock has generated that much investor emotion in the recent past, there's a good chance it does so in the near future, in our view. Which means we think that TSLA can trade well to Fibonacci levels going forward too.Pros Of Buying Tesla StockThe pros of buying Tesla stock are in our view:1 - the stock trades unrestrained by fundamentals, unconstrained by the news, and instead moves purely with sentiment. This means that the level-headed investor or trader can take advantage of the crowd - and also,2 - whilst it is true that other EVs are also available, Tesla's brand advantage and penchant for viral marketing means that the underlying fundamentals of the company do remain strong. That may change in the future; it may be that in the end Ford or GM swallow the beast as they did niche manufacturers a century back; but for now, Tesla remains the one to beat in EVs, and EVs remain the segment with the most consumer pull and government push.Let's take a look at the pro case. Back to the charts in order to do so.That 5-wave up sequence forms a larger-degree Wave One in our first chart above. Wave One starts in 2019 at around $45 (adjusted for the stock splits that have taken place since that time) and peaks late in 2021 at around $1,240. The larger-degree Wave Two that follows has bottomed out at a relatively shallow 0.5 retracement of that Wave One up. At first blush one could be forgiven for expecting a further drop - after all stock after stock has already put in 0.618 or 0.786 retracements of similar moves up. But that's rather the point. To our eye it looks like the 2022 bottom may well be in, because so many big-name stocks have bottomed out at those deep retracement levels. And we take that as evidence that maybe, maybe- TSLA has bottomed too.If that's the case, and we're now in a larger-degree Wave Three up, then as a function of that nuts Wave One, technically - which is to sayemotionally -we may reasonably expect the stock to run up from here to at least the top of the Wave 1 high, and more likely to the 100% extension of that Wave One. That means a bull target of $1,245 (minimum, if we're right) and a crazy ol' bullrider target of $1,805 (that's the 100% extension). We don't need to talk about the fact that most likely a Wave Three terminates at the 1.618 extension of Wave One, because that would suggest a meth-addled crack-snorting bull target of $2,534, and, honestly? We don't have the time to handle all the comments if we slapped a $2,534 stock price target on the name. But, between us? The stock is perfectly capable of achieving that target, and the only reason to disbelieve the potential is if you have yet to free your mind, and you still think that stock prices are driven primarily by fundamentals or by the news. (If you want to apply some reverse neurolinguistic programming to that mental block, take a look at a post of ours from March this year.)Cons Of Buying Tesla StockWell, this one is easy. Here's a bunch of reasons to not buy Tesla stock.1 - The valuation. 122x unlevered pretax free cashflow. Give your grandparents a quick call and ask them whether they think you should buy a stock valued at 122x cashflow. (It will be a quick call).2 - The hoopla. If you can't ignore the hoopla, if you are compelled to watch the Elon Musk show play out live on every media forum near you, well, that's exhausting, because if you're watching it then you can't help but wonder whether the latest move will undermine your investment in Tesla stock or not.The Latest (Twitter)Is that good for TSLA stock? Bad for TSLA stock? Will it make no difference? You already spent too much time thinking about it. You see the problem with hoopla.3 - The competition. It's not like Ford and VW and everyone gave up. They are behind, but spending like crazy and nobody likes a show-off, so, assume they have Tesla well in their sights.4 - The share sales by Elon Musk. Whatever the logic, they don't build investor confidence.The bear opinion on Tesla is mainly emotional and we think that is all best ignored. If you want to read a well-reasoned bear take on the name, read this Seeking Alpha article. The author vomited all over our last bull piece on Tesla and then wrote this, which is good work. We don't agree with the conclusions - but it's good work. Take a look.Is Tesla Stock Worth Investing In?In our long-run investment work we adopt the Wyckoff Cycle model. We aim to slowly accumulate a position in a stock when it is beaten down, stop buying once a certain price is reached, sit back in anticipation of the markup cycle then lifting the stock, and then distributing once a high is reached. We can't claim to do this perfectly of course, but it has worked pretty well for us through the recent Covid lows, 2020-2021 markup period and then into the 2021 highs. We sold a bunch of high beta names as their 5-wave cycles topped late last year, both in our Growth Investor Proservice and in staff personal accounts. Right now we have been through a period of 'accumulate' ratings in many high beta names and we seem to be moving into a markup period. Tesla has yet to move up and out of our accumulation price zone. If you go back to that first chart above, we think a viable way to invest in Tesla without taking on undue risk is:Accumulate - meaning build up slowly over time - a position in that green 'Accumulation Zone' box - let's call it between $624-$902 (yes those numbers are odd boundaries to pick - they represent the Fibonacci levels that define the zone for us). If the stock does move up then you can either just wait for a Wave Three to play out and sell as it nears those targets, and/or set a trailing stop on the way up. If the stock flames out, we believe that stops set in the region below say $610 (that's a little below the recent lows) are protective without being likely to get executed on a whim. The stock remains inside our Accumulation zone so we rate the stock at, er, Accumulate.We have invested in the stock in staff personal accounts; we rate the stock at Accumulate on a professional basis; and we think the risk-reward balance is good if you take an approach similar to the above. So for us? Yes, Tesla is worth investing in. But then we don't watch the hoopla and we wear lead helmets to work every day. You'll make the right decision for you, as always.This article was written by Cestrian Capital Research. This article is for reference only.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":150,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9993436965,"gmtCreate":1660712024460,"gmtModify":1676536385122,"author":{"id":"3574915362300502","authorId":"3574915362300502","name":"Thunderbird","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/86528f4fb847fbbf69680f5b0c603119","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574915362300502","authorIdStr":"3574915362300502"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Let see what this bill does","listText":"Let see what this bill does","text":"Let see what this bill does","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9993436965","repostId":"1160142489","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1160142489","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1660691907,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1160142489?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-08-17 07:18","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Biden Signs Inflation Reduction Act Into Law","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1160142489","media":"Reuters","summary":"(Reuters) - President Joe Biden on Tuesday signed into law a $430 billion bill that is seen as the b","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>(Reuters) - President Joe Biden on Tuesday signed into law a $430 billion bill that is seen as the biggest climate package in U.S. history, designed to cut domestic greenhouse gas emissions as well as lower prescription drug prices and high inflation.</p><p>At a White House event, Biden was joined by Democratic leaders including Senator Joe Manchin of West Virginia, whose support was crucial to passage of the Inflation Reduction Act along party lines, after he blockaded much larger measures pushed by the White House.</p><p>&#34;Joe, we never had a doubt,&#34; Biden said of Manchin. Biden later handed Manchin the pen he used to sign the legislation.</p><p>Manchin called the legislation a &#34;balanced bill&#34;.</p><p>Biden used the signing to criticize Republicans. Democrats hope to capitalize on a string of legislative victories in congressional midterm elections in November and roll out inflation act ad campaigns.</p><p>&#34;In this historic moment, Democrats sided with the American people and every single Republican sided with the special interests,&#34; said Biden. &#34;Every single Republican in Congress voted against this bill.&#34;</p><p>The legislation to fight climate change and lower prescription drug prices aims to cut domestic greenhouse gas emissions. It will also allow Medicare to negotiate lower drug prices for the elderly and ensure that corporations and the wealthy pay the taxes they owe.</p><p>Democrats say it will help combat inflation by reducing the federal deficit. Rating agencies and independent economists agree but say the results will take years.</p><p>Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, who was also present at the bill signing, said Biden knew when to stay away from the negotiations and allow them to play out.</p><p>&#34;He knew precisely when to step in and when to let negotiations play out. He knew when to use the bully pulpit and when to bring people together away from the spotlight. He made sure we never lost our focus on climate.&#34;</p><p>Republicans criticized the legislation for doing little to lower prices. Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell said the new law will have the opposite impact.</p><p>&#34;Democrats robbed Americans last year by spending our economy into record inflation. This year, their solution is to do it a second time. The partisan bill President Biden signed into law today means higher taxes, higher energy bills, and aggressive IRS audits,&#34; he said, referring to the Internal Revenue Service.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Biden Signs Inflation Reduction Act Into Law</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBiden Signs Inflation Reduction Act Into Law\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-08-17 07:18</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>(Reuters) - President Joe Biden on Tuesday signed into law a $430 billion bill that is seen as the biggest climate package in U.S. history, designed to cut domestic greenhouse gas emissions as well as lower prescription drug prices and high inflation.</p><p>At a White House event, Biden was joined by Democratic leaders including Senator Joe Manchin of West Virginia, whose support was crucial to passage of the Inflation Reduction Act along party lines, after he blockaded much larger measures pushed by the White House.</p><p>&#34;Joe, we never had a doubt,&#34; Biden said of Manchin. Biden later handed Manchin the pen he used to sign the legislation.</p><p>Manchin called the legislation a &#34;balanced bill&#34;.</p><p>Biden used the signing to criticize Republicans. Democrats hope to capitalize on a string of legislative victories in congressional midterm elections in November and roll out inflation act ad campaigns.</p><p>&#34;In this historic moment, Democrats sided with the American people and every single Republican sided with the special interests,&#34; said Biden. &#34;Every single Republican in Congress voted against this bill.&#34;</p><p>The legislation to fight climate change and lower prescription drug prices aims to cut domestic greenhouse gas emissions. It will also allow Medicare to negotiate lower drug prices for the elderly and ensure that corporations and the wealthy pay the taxes they owe.</p><p>Democrats say it will help combat inflation by reducing the federal deficit. Rating agencies and independent economists agree but say the results will take years.</p><p>Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, who was also present at the bill signing, said Biden knew when to stay away from the negotiations and allow them to play out.</p><p>&#34;He knew precisely when to step in and when to let negotiations play out. He knew when to use the bully pulpit and when to bring people together away from the spotlight. He made sure we never lost our focus on climate.&#34;</p><p>Republicans criticized the legislation for doing little to lower prices. Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell said the new law will have the opposite impact.</p><p>&#34;Democrats robbed Americans last year by spending our economy into record inflation. This year, their solution is to do it a second time. The partisan bill President Biden signed into law today means higher taxes, higher energy bills, and aggressive IRS audits,&#34; he said, referring to the Internal Revenue Service.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1160142489","content_text":"(Reuters) - President Joe Biden on Tuesday signed into law a $430 billion bill that is seen as the biggest climate package in U.S. history, designed to cut domestic greenhouse gas emissions as well as lower prescription drug prices and high inflation.At a White House event, Biden was joined by Democratic leaders including Senator Joe Manchin of West Virginia, whose support was crucial to passage of the Inflation Reduction Act along party lines, after he blockaded much larger measures pushed by the White House.\"Joe, we never had a doubt,\" Biden said of Manchin. Biden later handed Manchin the pen he used to sign the legislation.Manchin called the legislation a \"balanced bill\".Biden used the signing to criticize Republicans. Democrats hope to capitalize on a string of legislative victories in congressional midterm elections in November and roll out inflation act ad campaigns.\"In this historic moment, Democrats sided with the American people and every single Republican sided with the special interests,\" said Biden. \"Every single Republican in Congress voted against this bill.\"The legislation to fight climate change and lower prescription drug prices aims to cut domestic greenhouse gas emissions. It will also allow Medicare to negotiate lower drug prices for the elderly and ensure that corporations and the wealthy pay the taxes they owe.Democrats say it will help combat inflation by reducing the federal deficit. Rating agencies and independent economists agree but say the results will take years.Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, who was also present at the bill signing, said Biden knew when to stay away from the negotiations and allow them to play out.\"He knew precisely when to step in and when to let negotiations play out. He knew when to use the bully pulpit and when to bring people together away from the spotlight. He made sure we never lost our focus on climate.\"Republicans criticized the legislation for doing little to lower prices. Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell said the new law will have the opposite impact.\"Democrats robbed Americans last year by spending our economy into record inflation. This year, their solution is to do it a second time. The partisan bill President Biden signed into law today means higher taxes, higher energy bills, and aggressive IRS audits,\" he said, referring to the Internal Revenue Service.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":146,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9993367520,"gmtCreate":1660628589564,"gmtModify":1676536368886,"author":{"id":"3574915362300502","authorId":"3574915362300502","name":"Thunderbird","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/86528f4fb847fbbf69680f5b0c603119","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574915362300502","authorIdStr":"3574915362300502"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Please like :)","listText":"Please like :)","text":"Please like :)","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9993367520","repostId":"1186715007","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1186715007","pubTimestamp":1660627290,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1186715007?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-08-16 13:21","market":"us","language":"en","title":"What Are Single Stock & Bond ETFs? Should You Consider Buying Them","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1186715007","media":"The Street","summary":"While ETFs are known as a great way to get broad diversification in your portfolio at rock bottom prices, the latest industry trend goes decidedly in the opposite direction.ETFs targeting just a single stock have become all the rage lately. As I write this, 20 such ETFs have been launched in just the past two months with the potential for hundreds more coming down the line.The obvious question may be “why would somebody invest in a single stock ETF when they can just buy the stock?”","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>While ETFs are known as a great way to get broad diversification in your portfolio at rock bottom prices, the latest industry trend goes decidedly in the opposite direction.</p><p>ETFs targeting just a single stock have become all the rage lately. As I write this, 20 such ETFs have been launched in just the past two months with the potential for hundreds more coming down the line.</p><p>The obvious question may be “why would somebody invest in a single stock ETF when they can just buy the stock?” The answer is that they layer something on top of the single stock exposure. Some use an inverse strategy and the short the underlying stock. Others provide leveraged exposure. At least one uses a “hedged” strategy that adds options to limit the potential range of returns, much like the buffer ETFs that are already out there.</p><p>The SEC has gone on record with their concerns about the potential risks of single stock ETFs. In my opinion, it’s tough to argue why the SEC should reject them when it’s already approved a slew of triple-leveraged oil ETFs and other products. They have, however, limited the leverage that is being used in these ETFs. You won’t find any triple-leveraged funds here. The most we’ve seen so far is 2x exposure on Pfizer and Nike, but we’ll see if that changes down the road.</p><p>For the record, I don’t think there’s a market for these outside of short-term traders. Longer-term investors probably don’t need them since the expense ratios and the cost of leverage and need to roll over derivatives exposure on a daily basis could negate a lot of the upside of the leverage in the first place. But there are always folks who want to add a little juice to a short-term trade and these could be ideal for that purpose.</p><p>Let’s break down where we stand today with the list of available single stock ETFs.</p><p>Leveraged Single Stock ETFs</p><ul><li><b>AXS 1.5X PYPL Bull Daily ETF (PYPT)</b></li><li><b>AXS 2X NKE Bull Daily ETF (NKEL)</b></li><li><b>AXS 2X PFE Bull Daily ETF (PFEL)</b></li><li><b>GraniteShares 1.25X Long Tesla Daily ETF (TSL)</b></li><li><b>GraniteShares 1.5X Long Coinbase Daily ETF (CONL)</b></li><li><b>GraniteShares 1.75X Long AAPL Daily ETF (AAPB)</b></li><li><b>Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 1.5X Shares ETF (TSLL)</b></li><li><b>Direxion Daily AAPL Bull 1.5X Shares ETF (AAPU)</b></li></ul><p>So far, interest in these ETFs has been minor at best. TSLL is the largest of the group, but it’s gained only $7 million in assets. Most are still just starting off with $1-2 million. Even the 1.5X Coinbase ETF hasn’t really gotten any traction, which I find a little surprising. The stock itself has had a rough go of it lately, so I imagine that could perhaps make investors a little gun-shy. It’s still very early on and some of these ETFs are only a week old. It’s too early to draw any conclusions and these may take off yet.</p><p>You can see the relative comfort level of the SEC in approving these ETFs based on the amount of leverage allowed. Nike and Pfizer are more established blue chip names and, therefore, got a higher degree of leverage for NKEL and PFEL. Apple and PayPal being slightly more volatile tech names got a little less. I’m a little surprised that CONL and TSSL got approved for 1.5X exposure given how volatile they are. The expense ratios on the Direxion and GraniteShares ETFs are 0.97% and 1.15%, respectively, so these products are not necessarily cheap to own and hold.</p><p>Inverse Single Stock ETFs</p><ul><li><b>AXS 1.5X PYPL Bear Daily ETF (PYPS)</b></li><li><b>AXS 2X NKE Bear Daily ETF (NKEQ)</b></li><li><b>AXS 2X PFE Bear Daily ETF (PFES)</b></li><li><b>AXS TSLA Bear Daily ETF (TSLQ)</b></li><li><b>AXS 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF (NVDS)</b></li><li><b>GraniteShares 1X Short Tesla Daily ETF (TSLI)</b></li><li><b>Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X Shares ETF (TSLS)</b></li><li><b>Direxion Daily AAPL Bear 1X Shares ETF (AAPD)</b></li></ul><p>Most of the long ETFs listed above have short counterparts. AXS opted for short-only versions of their Tesla and NVIDIA ETFs. TSLQ, TSLI and TSLS are essentially identical in their exposures. NVDS has just a little bit of short leverage to provide some extra downside. The AXS funds are really the only ones that offer more meaningful leverage on the inverse side.</p><p>Hedged Single Stock ETFs</p><ul><li><b>Innovator Hedged TSLA Strategy ETF (TSLH)</b></li></ul><p>As mentioned earlier, TSLH is the more unique ETF of the group in that it combines an options strategy on top of Tesla to put a cap on gains and a floor on returns. On a quarterly basis, the cap on positive returns is 9.29% with the floor on losses set at 10%. Tesla can obviously have swings like that on a daily basis, but for people who want to take a swing at owning Tesla but also protect themselves from severe losses, this could be an option.</p><p>The buffer ETFs (also offered by Innovator among others) have built up more than $16 billion in assets, so there’s definitely a market for these products. We’ll see if the buffer ETF concept for indexes translates over to a similar strategy for single stocks, but there’s reason to think it might.</p><p>Single Bond ETFs</p><ul><li><b>U.S. Treasury 3 Month Bill ETF (TBIL)</b></li><li><b>U.S. Treasury 2 Year Note ETF (UTWO)</b></li><li><b>U.S. Treasury 10 Year Note ETF (UTEN)</b></li></ul><p>These ETFs I find really interesting. Whereas a lot of fixed income funds hold potentially thousands of different bonds, these hold one single bond - the latest issue of U.S. government bonds at these maturities. It’s as close as you’ll get to owning the actual bond without actually owning it.</p><p>The benefit of these, using UTEN as an example, is that they will own the most recent 10-year note, but then roll it over into the newest 10-year note when it’s issued. You’re essentially getting consistent 10-year note exposure. If you buy an individual government bond, the remaining maturity changes over time as does its interest rate risk. These ETFs will maintain ongoing exposure to the newest issued bonds and shareholders won’t have to do a thing.</p><p>Each comes with an expense ratio of 0.15%, so they’re relatively cheap to own as well. Investors have already responded positively with TBIL and UTEN already having more than $20 million in assets each.</p><p>Conclusion</p><p>I can see two things happening with single stock ETFs - 1) dozens, if not hundreds, of these ETFs could eventually be launched and 2) most of them will gain almost no interest. The only ones that are likely going to be winners in terms of assets are going to be the ones based on “buzzy” stocks, such as Tesla or Netflix or Twitter or some of the FAAMG names. Anything else is probably going to be DOA. Is anybody really looking for leveraged exposure on Pfizer in an ETF?</p><p>I see single stock ETFs going in four directions - leveraged, inverse, buffer and covered calls. The first three have been launched already. The fourth one has yet to debut, but I think it’s coming. An ETF that owns Microsoft, for example, and writes calls based on Microsoft stock I think could be an interesting strategy. High yield investors could be intrigued with capturing a 5%+ yield with equity exposure much like they have with other covered call ETFs.</p><p>In short, I think these are certainly unique and probably fill a gap or some investors, but not many. These will be for traders, but longer-term investors probably won’t have much use for them. I think a lot of these could eventually be closed due to lack of interest. It’s only been two months and we’ve already got 6 ETFs based on Tesla. Not all of them are going to survive and this space could get watered down quickly.</p></body></html>","source":"lsy1610613172068","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>What Are Single Stock & Bond ETFs? Should You Consider Buying Them</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhat Are Single Stock & Bond ETFs? Should You Consider Buying Them\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-08-16 13:21 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.thestreet.com/etffocus/trade-ideas/investing-strategy-single-stock-bond-etfs-what-are-they-should-you-consider-buying-them><strong>The Street</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>While ETFs are known as a great way to get broad diversification in your portfolio at rock bottom prices, the latest industry trend goes decidedly in the opposite direction.ETFs targeting just a ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.thestreet.com/etffocus/trade-ideas/investing-strategy-single-stock-bond-etfs-what-are-they-should-you-consider-buying-them\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"PYPT":"PayPal 1.5倍做多ETF-AXS","AAPD":"Direxion Daily AAPL Bear 1X Shares","TSLQ":"Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF"},"source_url":"https://www.thestreet.com/etffocus/trade-ideas/investing-strategy-single-stock-bond-etfs-what-are-they-should-you-consider-buying-them","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1186715007","content_text":"While ETFs are known as a great way to get broad diversification in your portfolio at rock bottom prices, the latest industry trend goes decidedly in the opposite direction.ETFs targeting just a single stock have become all the rage lately. As I write this, 20 such ETFs have been launched in just the past two months with the potential for hundreds more coming down the line.The obvious question may be “why would somebody invest in a single stock ETF when they can just buy the stock?” The answer is that they layer something on top of the single stock exposure. Some use an inverse strategy and the short the underlying stock. Others provide leveraged exposure. At least one uses a “hedged” strategy that adds options to limit the potential range of returns, much like the buffer ETFs that are already out there.The SEC has gone on record with their concerns about the potential risks of single stock ETFs. In my opinion, it’s tough to argue why the SEC should reject them when it’s already approved a slew of triple-leveraged oil ETFs and other products. They have, however, limited the leverage that is being used in these ETFs. You won’t find any triple-leveraged funds here. The most we’ve seen so far is 2x exposure on Pfizer and Nike, but we’ll see if that changes down the road.For the record, I don’t think there’s a market for these outside of short-term traders. Longer-term investors probably don’t need them since the expense ratios and the cost of leverage and need to roll over derivatives exposure on a daily basis could negate a lot of the upside of the leverage in the first place. But there are always folks who want to add a little juice to a short-term trade and these could be ideal for that purpose.Let’s break down where we stand today with the list of available single stock ETFs.Leveraged Single Stock ETFsAXS 1.5X PYPL Bull Daily ETF (PYPT)AXS 2X NKE Bull Daily ETF (NKEL)AXS 2X PFE Bull Daily ETF (PFEL)GraniteShares 1.25X Long Tesla Daily ETF (TSL)GraniteShares 1.5X Long Coinbase Daily ETF (CONL)GraniteShares 1.75X Long AAPL Daily ETF (AAPB)Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 1.5X Shares ETF (TSLL)Direxion Daily AAPL Bull 1.5X Shares ETF (AAPU)So far, interest in these ETFs has been minor at best. TSLL is the largest of the group, but it’s gained only $7 million in assets. Most are still just starting off with $1-2 million. Even the 1.5X Coinbase ETF hasn’t really gotten any traction, which I find a little surprising. The stock itself has had a rough go of it lately, so I imagine that could perhaps make investors a little gun-shy. It’s still very early on and some of these ETFs are only a week old. It’s too early to draw any conclusions and these may take off yet.You can see the relative comfort level of the SEC in approving these ETFs based on the amount of leverage allowed. Nike and Pfizer are more established blue chip names and, therefore, got a higher degree of leverage for NKEL and PFEL. Apple and PayPal being slightly more volatile tech names got a little less. I’m a little surprised that CONL and TSSL got approved for 1.5X exposure given how volatile they are. The expense ratios on the Direxion and GraniteShares ETFs are 0.97% and 1.15%, respectively, so these products are not necessarily cheap to own and hold.Inverse Single Stock ETFsAXS 1.5X PYPL Bear Daily ETF (PYPS)AXS 2X NKE Bear Daily ETF (NKEQ)AXS 2X PFE Bear Daily ETF (PFES)AXS TSLA Bear Daily ETF (TSLQ)AXS 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF (NVDS)GraniteShares 1X Short Tesla Daily ETF (TSLI)Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X Shares ETF (TSLS)Direxion Daily AAPL Bear 1X Shares ETF (AAPD)Most of the long ETFs listed above have short counterparts. AXS opted for short-only versions of their Tesla and NVIDIA ETFs. TSLQ, TSLI and TSLS are essentially identical in their exposures. NVDS has just a little bit of short leverage to provide some extra downside. The AXS funds are really the only ones that offer more meaningful leverage on the inverse side.Hedged Single Stock ETFsInnovator Hedged TSLA Strategy ETF (TSLH)As mentioned earlier, TSLH is the more unique ETF of the group in that it combines an options strategy on top of Tesla to put a cap on gains and a floor on returns. On a quarterly basis, the cap on positive returns is 9.29% with the floor on losses set at 10%. Tesla can obviously have swings like that on a daily basis, but for people who want to take a swing at owning Tesla but also protect themselves from severe losses, this could be an option.The buffer ETFs (also offered by Innovator among others) have built up more than $16 billion in assets, so there’s definitely a market for these products. We’ll see if the buffer ETF concept for indexes translates over to a similar strategy for single stocks, but there’s reason to think it might.Single Bond ETFsU.S. Treasury 3 Month Bill ETF (TBIL)U.S. Treasury 2 Year Note ETF (UTWO)U.S. Treasury 10 Year Note ETF (UTEN)These ETFs I find really interesting. Whereas a lot of fixed income funds hold potentially thousands of different bonds, these hold one single bond - the latest issue of U.S. government bonds at these maturities. It’s as close as you’ll get to owning the actual bond without actually owning it.The benefit of these, using UTEN as an example, is that they will own the most recent 10-year note, but then roll it over into the newest 10-year note when it’s issued. You’re essentially getting consistent 10-year note exposure. If you buy an individual government bond, the remaining maturity changes over time as does its interest rate risk. These ETFs will maintain ongoing exposure to the newest issued bonds and shareholders won’t have to do a thing.Each comes with an expense ratio of 0.15%, so they’re relatively cheap to own as well. Investors have already responded positively with TBIL and UTEN already having more than $20 million in assets each.ConclusionI can see two things happening with single stock ETFs - 1) dozens, if not hundreds, of these ETFs could eventually be launched and 2) most of them will gain almost no interest. The only ones that are likely going to be winners in terms of assets are going to be the ones based on “buzzy” stocks, such as Tesla or Netflix or Twitter or some of the FAAMG names. Anything else is probably going to be DOA. Is anybody really looking for leveraged exposure on Pfizer in an ETF?I see single stock ETFs going in four directions - leveraged, inverse, buffer and covered calls. The first three have been launched already. The fourth one has yet to debut, but I think it’s coming. An ETF that owns Microsoft, for example, and writes calls based on Microsoft stock I think could be an interesting strategy. High yield investors could be intrigued with capturing a 5%+ yield with equity exposure much like they have with other covered call ETFs.In short, I think these are certainly unique and probably fill a gap or some investors, but not many. These will be for traders, but longer-term investors probably won’t have much use for them. I think a lot of these could eventually be closed due to lack of interest. It’s only been two months and we’ve already got 6 ETFs based on Tesla. Not all of them are going to survive and this space could get watered down quickly.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":171,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9993385183,"gmtCreate":1660625945644,"gmtModify":1676536368498,"author":{"id":"3574915362300502","authorId":"3574915362300502","name":"Thunderbird","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/86528f4fb847fbbf69680f5b0c603119","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574915362300502","authorIdStr":"3574915362300502"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Climate change is REAL!","listText":"Climate change is REAL!","text":"Climate change is REAL!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9993385183","repostId":"2259022645","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":122,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9999515764,"gmtCreate":1660551814960,"gmtModify":1676534235355,"author":{"id":"3574915362300502","authorId":"3574915362300502","name":"Thunderbird","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/86528f4fb847fbbf69680f5b0c603119","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574915362300502","authorIdStr":"3574915362300502"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9999515764","repostId":"1118303564","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1118303564","pubTimestamp":1660546996,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1118303564?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-08-15 15:03","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Options Trading Strategies: 5 Strategies for Beginners","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1118303564","media":"Investopedia","summary":"KEY TAKEAWAYSOptions trading may sound risky or complex for beginner investors, and so they often st","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>KEY TAKEAWAYS</b></p><ul><li>Options trading may sound risky or complex for beginner investors, and so they often stay away.</li><li>Some basic strategies using options, however, can help a novice investor protect their downside and hedge market risk.</li><li>Here we look at four such strategies: long calls, long puts, covered calls, protective puts, and straddles.</li><li>Options trading can be complex, so be sure to understand the risks and rewards involved before diving in.</li></ul><p>Options are a form of derivative contract that gives buyers of the contracts (the option holders) the right (but not the obligation) to buy or sell a security at a chosen price at some point in the future. Option buyers are charged an amount called a premium by the sellers for such a right. Should market prices be unfavorable for option holders, they will let the option expire worthless and not exercise this right, ensuring that potential losses are not higher than the premium. On the other hand, if the market moves in the direction that makes this right more valuable, it makes use of it.</p><p>Options are generally divided into &#34;call&#34; and &#34;put&#34; contracts. With a call option, the buyer of the contract purchases the right to <i>buy</i> the underlying asset in the future at a predetermined price, called exercise price or strike price. With a put option, the buyer acquires the right to <i>sell</i> the underlying asset in the future at the predetermined price.</p><p>Let&#39;s take a look at some basic strategies that a beginner investor can use with calls or puts to limit their risk. The first two involve using options to place a direction bet with a limited downside if the bet goes wrong. The others involve hedging strategies laid on top of existing positions.</p><p><b>Buying Calls (Long Calls)</b></p><p>There are some advantages to trading options for those looking to make a directional bet in the market. If you think the price of an asset will rise, you can buy a call option using less capital than the asset itself. At the same time, if the price instead falls, your losses are limited to the premium paid for the options and no more. This could be a preferred strategy for traders who:</p><ul><li>Are &#34;bullish&#34; or confident about a particular stock, exchange-traded fund (ETF), or index fund and want to limit risk</li><li>Want to utilize leverage to take advantage of rising prices</li></ul><p>Options are essentially leveraged instruments in that they allow traders to amplify the potential upside benefit by using smaller amounts than would otherwise be required if trading the underlying asset itself. So, instead of laying out $10,000 to buy 100 shares of a $100 stock, you could hypothetically spend, say, $2,000 on a call contract with a strike price 10% higher than the current market price.</p><p><b>Tip: </b>A standard equity option contract on a stockcontrols100 shares of theunderlying security.</p><p><b>Example</b></p><p>Suppose a trader wants to invest $5,000 in Apple (AAPL), trading at around $165 per share. With this amount, they can purchase 30 shares for $4,950. Suppose then that the price of the stock increases by 10% to $181.50 over the next month. Ignoring any brokerage commission or transaction fees, the trader’s portfolio will rise to $5,445, leaving the trader with a net dollar return of $495, or 10% on the capital invested.</p><p>Now, let&#39;s say a call option on the stock with a strike price of $165 that expires about a month from now costs $5.50 per share or $550 per contract. Given the trader&#39;s available investment budget, they can buy nine options for a cost of $4,950. Because the option contract controls 100 shares, the trader is effectively making a deal on 900 shares. If the stock price increases 10% to $181.50 at expiration, the option will expire in the money (ITM) and be worth $16.50 per share (for a $181.50 to $165 strike), or $14,850 on 900 shares. That&#39;s a net dollar return of $9,990, or 200% on the capital invested, a much larger return compared to trading the underlying asset directly.</p><p><b>Risk/reward</b></p><p>The trader&#39;s potential loss from a long call is limited to the premium paid. Potential profit is unlimited because the option payoff will increase along with the underlying asset price until expiration, and there is theoretically no limit to how high it can go.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ed43525aed99dba37e990ddd8a9e733b\" tg-width=\"660\" tg-height=\"418\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Image by Julie Bang Â© Investopedia 2019</span></p><p><b>Buying Puts (Long Puts)</b></p><p>If a call option gives the holder the right to purchase the underlying at a set price before the contract expires, a put option gives the holder the right to<i>sell</i>the underlying at a set price. This is a preferred strategy for traders who:</p><ul><li>Are bearish on a particular stock, ETF, or index, but want to take on less risk than with a short-selling strategy</li><li>Want to utilize leverage to take advantage of falling prices</li></ul><p>A put option works effectively in the exact opposite direction from the way a call option does, with the put option gaining value as the price of the underlying decreases. Though short-selling also allows a trader to profit from falling prices, the risk with a short position is unlimited because there is theoretically no limit to how high a price can rise. With a put option, if the underlying ends up higher than the option&#39;s strike price, the option will simply expire worthless.</p><p><b>Example</b></p><p>Say that you think the price of a stock is likely to decline from $60 to $50 or lower based on bad earnings, but you don&#39;t want to risk selling the stock short in case you are wrong. Instead, you can buy the $50 put for a premium of $2.00. If the stock does not fall below $50, or if indeed it rises, the most you will lose is the $2.00 premium.</p><p>However, if you are right and the stock drops all the way to $45, you would make $3 ($50 minus $45. less the $2 premium).</p><p><b>Risk/reward</b></p><p>The potential loss on a long put is limited to the premium paid for the options. The maximum profit from the position is capped because the underlying price cannot drop below zero, but as with a long call option, the put option leverages the trader&#39;s return.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1f638a5e4f684842b15ec2bd01016b96\" tg-width=\"660\" tg-height=\"418\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Image by Julie Bang Â© Investopedia 2019</span></p><p><b>Covered Calls</b></p><p>Unlike the long call or long put, a covered call is a strategy that is overlaid onto an existing long position in the underlying asset. It is essentially an upside call that is sold in an amount that would cover that existing position size. In this way, the covered call writer collects the option premium as income, but also limits the upside potential of the underlying position. This is a preferred position for traders who:</p><ul><li>Expect no change or a slight increase in the underlying&#39;s price, collecting the full option premium</li><li>Are willing to limit upside potential in exchange for some downside protection</li></ul><p>A covered call strategy involves buying 100 shares of the underlying asset and selling a call option against those shares. When the trader sells the call, the option&#39;s premium is collected, thus lowering the cost basison the shares and providing some downside protection. In return, by selling the option, the trader is agreeing to sell shares of the underlying at the option&#39;s strike price, thereby capping the trader&#39;s upside potential.</p><p><b>Example</b></p><p>Suppose a trader buys 1,000 shares of BP (BP) at $44 per share and simultaneously writes 10 call options (one contract for every 100 shares) with a strike price of $46 expiring in one month, at a cost of $0.25 per share, or $25 per contract and $250 total for the 10 contracts. The $0.25 premium reduces the cost basis on the shares to $43.75, so any drop in the underlying down to this point will be offset by the premium received from the option position, thus offering limited downside protection.</p><p>If the share price rises above $46 before expiration, the short call option will be exercised (or &#34;called away&#34;), meaning the trader will have to deliver the stock at the option&#39;s strike price. In this case, the trader will make a profit of $2.25 per share ($46 strike price - $43.75 cost basis).</p><p>However, this example implies the trader does not expect BP to move above $46 or significantly below $44 over the next month. As long as the shares do not rise above $46 and get called away before the options expire, the trader will keep the premium free and clear and can continue selling calls against the shares if desired.</p><p><b>Risk/reward</b></p><p>If the share price rises above the strike price before expiration, the short call option can be exercised and the trader will have to deliver shares of the underlying at the option&#39;s strike price, even if it is below the market price. In exchange for this risk, a covered call strategy provides limited downside protection in the form of the premium received when selling the call option.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/060c4075ba84fa8406865044327bb21a\" tg-width=\"660\" tg-height=\"418\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Image by Julie Bang Â© Investopedia 2019</span></p><p><b>Protective Puts</b></p><p>A protective put involves buying a downside put in an amount to cover an existing position in the underlying asset. In effect, this strategy puts a lower floor below which you cannot lose more. Of course, you will have to pay for the option&#39;s premium. In this way, it acts as a sort of insurance policy against losses. This is a preferred strategy for traders who own the underlying asset and want downside protection.</p><p>Thus, a protective put is a long put, like the strategy we discussed above; however, the goal, as the name implies, is downside protection versus attempting to profit from a downside move. If a trader owns shares with a bullish sentiment in the long run but wants to protect against a decline in the short run, they may purchase a protective put.</p><p>If the price of the underlying increases and is above the put&#39;s strike price at maturity, the option expires worthless and the trader loses the premium but still has the benefit of the increased underlying price. On the other hand, if the underlying price decreases, the trader’s portfolio position loses value, but this loss is largely covered by the gain from the put option position. Hence, the position can effectively be thought of as an insurance strategy.</p><p><b>Example</b></p><p>The trader can set the strike price below the current price to reduce premium payment at the expense of decreasing downside protection. This can be thought of as deductible insurance. Suppose, for example, that an investor buys 1,000 shares of Coca-Cola (KO) at a price of $44 and wants to protect the investment from adverse price movements over the next two months. The following put options are available:</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0b1cae54dd9829363240190149f81ae7\" tg-width=\"884\" tg-height=\"487\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>The table shows that the cost of protection increases with the level thereof. For example, if the trader wants to protect the investment against any drop in price, they can buy 10 at-the-money put options at a strike price of $44 for $1.23 per share, or $123 per contract, for a total cost of $1,230. However, if the trader is willing to tolerate some level of downside risk, choosing a less costly out-of-the-money (OTM)option such as the $40 put could also work. In this case, the cost of the option position will be much lower at only $200.</p><p><b>Risk/reward</b></p><p>If the price of the underlying stays the same or rises, the potential loss will be limited to the option premium, which is paid as insurance. If, however, the price of the underlying drops, the loss in capital will be offset by an increase in the option&#39;s price and is limited to the difference between the initial stock price and strike price plus the premium paid for the option. In the example above, at the strike price of $40, the loss is limited to $4.20 per share ($44 - $40 + $0.20).</p><p><b>Long Straddles</b></p><p>Buying a straddle lets you capitalize on future volatility but without having to take a bet whether the move will be to the upside or downside—either direction will profit.</p><p>Here, an investor buys both a call option and a put option at the same strike price and expiration on the same underlying. Because it involves purchasing two at-the-money options, it is more expensive than some other strategies.</p><p><b>Example</b></p><p>Consider someone who expects a particular stock to experience large price fluctuations following an earnings announcement on Jan. 15. Currently, the stock’s price is $100.</p><p>The investor creates a straddle by purchasing both a $5 put option and a $5 call option at a $100 strike price which expires on Jan. 30. The net option premium for this straddle is $10. The trader would realize a profit if the price of the underlying security was above $110 (which is the strike price plus the net option premium) or below $90 (which is the strike price minus the net option premium) at the time of expiration.</p><p><b>Risk/reward</b></p><p>A long straddle can only lose a maximum of what you paid for it. Since it involves two options, however, it will cost more than either a call or put by itself. The maximum reward is theoretically unlimited to the upside and is bounded to the downside by the strike price (e.g., if you own a $20 straddle and the stock price goes to zero, you would make a max. of $20).</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/99417c09afae347175e4c7c0a2b17fcd\" tg-width=\"660\" tg-height=\"418\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Image by Julie Bang Â© Investopedia 2019</span></p><p><b>Some Basic Other Options Strategies</b></p><p>The strategies outlined here are straightforward and can be employed by most novice traders or investors. There are, however, more nuanced strategies than simply buying calls or puts. While we discuss many of these types of strategies elsewhere, here is just a brief list of some other basic options positions that would be suitable for those comfortable with the ones discussed above:</p><ul><li><b>Married put strategy:</b> Similar to a protective put, themarried putinvolves buying anat-the-money (ATM)put option in an amount to cover an existing long position in the stock. In this way, it mimics a call option (sometimes called asynthetic call).</li><li><b>Protective collar strategy:</b> With aprotective collar, an investor who holds a long position in the underlying buys an out-of-the-money (i.e., downside) put option, while at the same time writing an out-of-the-money (upside) call option for the same stock.</li><li><b>Long strangle strategy:</b> Similar to the straddle, the buyer of astranglegoes long on an out-of-the-money call option and a put option at the same time. They will have the same expiration date, but they have different strike prices: The put strike price should be below the call strike price. This involves a lower outlay of premium than a straddle but also requires the stock to move either higher to the upside or lower to the downside in order to be profitable.</li><li><b>Vertical Spreads</b>: A vertical spread involves the simultaneous buying and selling of options of the same type (i.e., either puts or calls) and expiry, but at different strike prices. These can be constructed as either bull or bear spreads, which will profit when the market rises or falls, respectively. Spreads are less costly that a long call or long put since you are also receiving the options premium from the one you sold. However, this also limits your potential upside to the width between the strikes.</li></ul><p><b>Advantages and Disadvantages of Trading Options</b></p><p>The biggest advantage to buying options is that you have great upside potential with losses limited only to the option&#39;s premium. However, this can also be a drawback since options will expire worthless if the stock does not move enough to be in-the-money. This means that buying a lot of out-of-the-money options can be costly.</p><p>Options can be very useful as a source of leverage and risk hedging. For example, a bullish investor who wishes to invest $1,000 in a company could potentially earn a far greater return by purchasing $1,000 worth of call options on that firm, as compared to buying $1,000 of that company’s shares. In this sense, the call options provide the investor with a way to leverage their position by increasing their buying power. On the other hand, if that same investor already has exposure to that same company and wants to reduce that exposure, they could hedge their risk by selling put options against that company.</p><p>The main disadvantage of options contracts is that they are complex and difficult to price. This is why options are often considered a more advanced investment vehicle, suitable only for experienced investors. In recent years, they have become increasingly popular among retail investors. Because of their capacity for outsized returns or losses, investors should make sure they fully understand the potential implications before entering into any options positions. Failing to do so can lead to devastating losses.</p><p>There is also a large risk selling options in that you take on theoretically unlimited risk with profits limited to the premium (price) received for the option.</p></body></html>","source":"lsy1606203311635","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Options Trading Strategies: 5 Strategies for Beginners</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nOptions Trading Strategies: 5 Strategies for Beginners\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-08-15 15:03 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.investopedia.com/articles/active-trading/040915/guide-option-trading-strategies-beginners.asp><strong>Investopedia</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>KEY TAKEAWAYSOptions trading may sound risky or complex for beginner investors, and so they often stay away.Some basic strategies using options, however, can help a novice investor protect their ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.investopedia.com/articles/active-trading/040915/guide-option-trading-strategies-beginners.asp\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://www.investopedia.com/articles/active-trading/040915/guide-option-trading-strategies-beginners.asp","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1118303564","content_text":"KEY TAKEAWAYSOptions trading may sound risky or complex for beginner investors, and so they often stay away.Some basic strategies using options, however, can help a novice investor protect their downside and hedge market risk.Here we look at four such strategies: long calls, long puts, covered calls, protective puts, and straddles.Options trading can be complex, so be sure to understand the risks and rewards involved before diving in.Options are a form of derivative contract that gives buyers of the contracts (the option holders) the right (but not the obligation) to buy or sell a security at a chosen price at some point in the future. Option buyers are charged an amount called a premium by the sellers for such a right. Should market prices be unfavorable for option holders, they will let the option expire worthless and not exercise this right, ensuring that potential losses are not higher than the premium. On the other hand, if the market moves in the direction that makes this right more valuable, it makes use of it.Options are generally divided into \"call\" and \"put\" contracts. With a call option, the buyer of the contract purchases the right to buy the underlying asset in the future at a predetermined price, called exercise price or strike price. With a put option, the buyer acquires the right to sell the underlying asset in the future at the predetermined price.Let's take a look at some basic strategies that a beginner investor can use with calls or puts to limit their risk. The first two involve using options to place a direction bet with a limited downside if the bet goes wrong. The others involve hedging strategies laid on top of existing positions.Buying Calls (Long Calls)There are some advantages to trading options for those looking to make a directional bet in the market. If you think the price of an asset will rise, you can buy a call option using less capital than the asset itself. At the same time, if the price instead falls, your losses are limited to the premium paid for the options and no more. This could be a preferred strategy for traders who:Are \"bullish\" or confident about a particular stock, exchange-traded fund (ETF), or index fund and want to limit riskWant to utilize leverage to take advantage of rising pricesOptions are essentially leveraged instruments in that they allow traders to amplify the potential upside benefit by using smaller amounts than would otherwise be required if trading the underlying asset itself. So, instead of laying out $10,000 to buy 100 shares of a $100 stock, you could hypothetically spend, say, $2,000 on a call contract with a strike price 10% higher than the current market price.Tip: A standard equity option contract on a stockcontrols100 shares of theunderlying security.ExampleSuppose a trader wants to invest $5,000 in Apple (AAPL), trading at around $165 per share. With this amount, they can purchase 30 shares for $4,950. Suppose then that the price of the stock increases by 10% to $181.50 over the next month. Ignoring any brokerage commission or transaction fees, the trader’s portfolio will rise to $5,445, leaving the trader with a net dollar return of $495, or 10% on the capital invested.Now, let's say a call option on the stock with a strike price of $165 that expires about a month from now costs $5.50 per share or $550 per contract. Given the trader's available investment budget, they can buy nine options for a cost of $4,950. Because the option contract controls 100 shares, the trader is effectively making a deal on 900 shares. If the stock price increases 10% to $181.50 at expiration, the option will expire in the money (ITM) and be worth $16.50 per share (for a $181.50 to $165 strike), or $14,850 on 900 shares. That's a net dollar return of $9,990, or 200% on the capital invested, a much larger return compared to trading the underlying asset directly.Risk/rewardThe trader's potential loss from a long call is limited to the premium paid. Potential profit is unlimited because the option payoff will increase along with the underlying asset price until expiration, and there is theoretically no limit to how high it can go.Image by Julie Bang Â© Investopedia 2019Buying Puts (Long Puts)If a call option gives the holder the right to purchase the underlying at a set price before the contract expires, a put option gives the holder the right tosellthe underlying at a set price. This is a preferred strategy for traders who:Are bearish on a particular stock, ETF, or index, but want to take on less risk than with a short-selling strategyWant to utilize leverage to take advantage of falling pricesA put option works effectively in the exact opposite direction from the way a call option does, with the put option gaining value as the price of the underlying decreases. Though short-selling also allows a trader to profit from falling prices, the risk with a short position is unlimited because there is theoretically no limit to how high a price can rise. With a put option, if the underlying ends up higher than the option's strike price, the option will simply expire worthless.ExampleSay that you think the price of a stock is likely to decline from $60 to $50 or lower based on bad earnings, but you don't want to risk selling the stock short in case you are wrong. Instead, you can buy the $50 put for a premium of $2.00. If the stock does not fall below $50, or if indeed it rises, the most you will lose is the $2.00 premium.However, if you are right and the stock drops all the way to $45, you would make $3 ($50 minus $45. less the $2 premium).Risk/rewardThe potential loss on a long put is limited to the premium paid for the options. The maximum profit from the position is capped because the underlying price cannot drop below zero, but as with a long call option, the put option leverages the trader's return.Image by Julie Bang Â© Investopedia 2019Covered CallsUnlike the long call or long put, a covered call is a strategy that is overlaid onto an existing long position in the underlying asset. It is essentially an upside call that is sold in an amount that would cover that existing position size. In this way, the covered call writer collects the option premium as income, but also limits the upside potential of the underlying position. This is a preferred position for traders who:Expect no change or a slight increase in the underlying's price, collecting the full option premiumAre willing to limit upside potential in exchange for some downside protectionA covered call strategy involves buying 100 shares of the underlying asset and selling a call option against those shares. When the trader sells the call, the option's premium is collected, thus lowering the cost basison the shares and providing some downside protection. In return, by selling the option, the trader is agreeing to sell shares of the underlying at the option's strike price, thereby capping the trader's upside potential.ExampleSuppose a trader buys 1,000 shares of BP (BP) at $44 per share and simultaneously writes 10 call options (one contract for every 100 shares) with a strike price of $46 expiring in one month, at a cost of $0.25 per share, or $25 per contract and $250 total for the 10 contracts. The $0.25 premium reduces the cost basis on the shares to $43.75, so any drop in the underlying down to this point will be offset by the premium received from the option position, thus offering limited downside protection.If the share price rises above $46 before expiration, the short call option will be exercised (or \"called away\"), meaning the trader will have to deliver the stock at the option's strike price. In this case, the trader will make a profit of $2.25 per share ($46 strike price - $43.75 cost basis).However, this example implies the trader does not expect BP to move above $46 or significantly below $44 over the next month. As long as the shares do not rise above $46 and get called away before the options expire, the trader will keep the premium free and clear and can continue selling calls against the shares if desired.Risk/rewardIf the share price rises above the strike price before expiration, the short call option can be exercised and the trader will have to deliver shares of the underlying at the option's strike price, even if it is below the market price. In exchange for this risk, a covered call strategy provides limited downside protection in the form of the premium received when selling the call option.Image by Julie Bang Â© Investopedia 2019Protective PutsA protective put involves buying a downside put in an amount to cover an existing position in the underlying asset. In effect, this strategy puts a lower floor below which you cannot lose more. Of course, you will have to pay for the option's premium. In this way, it acts as a sort of insurance policy against losses. This is a preferred strategy for traders who own the underlying asset and want downside protection.Thus, a protective put is a long put, like the strategy we discussed above; however, the goal, as the name implies, is downside protection versus attempting to profit from a downside move. If a trader owns shares with a bullish sentiment in the long run but wants to protect against a decline in the short run, they may purchase a protective put.If the price of the underlying increases and is above the put's strike price at maturity, the option expires worthless and the trader loses the premium but still has the benefit of the increased underlying price. On the other hand, if the underlying price decreases, the trader’s portfolio position loses value, but this loss is largely covered by the gain from the put option position. Hence, the position can effectively be thought of as an insurance strategy.ExampleThe trader can set the strike price below the current price to reduce premium payment at the expense of decreasing downside protection. This can be thought of as deductible insurance. Suppose, for example, that an investor buys 1,000 shares of Coca-Cola (KO) at a price of $44 and wants to protect the investment from adverse price movements over the next two months. The following put options are available:The table shows that the cost of protection increases with the level thereof. For example, if the trader wants to protect the investment against any drop in price, they can buy 10 at-the-money put options at a strike price of $44 for $1.23 per share, or $123 per contract, for a total cost of $1,230. However, if the trader is willing to tolerate some level of downside risk, choosing a less costly out-of-the-money (OTM)option such as the $40 put could also work. In this case, the cost of the option position will be much lower at only $200.Risk/rewardIf the price of the underlying stays the same or rises, the potential loss will be limited to the option premium, which is paid as insurance. If, however, the price of the underlying drops, the loss in capital will be offset by an increase in the option's price and is limited to the difference between the initial stock price and strike price plus the premium paid for the option. In the example above, at the strike price of $40, the loss is limited to $4.20 per share ($44 - $40 + $0.20).Long StraddlesBuying a straddle lets you capitalize on future volatility but without having to take a bet whether the move will be to the upside or downside—either direction will profit.Here, an investor buys both a call option and a put option at the same strike price and expiration on the same underlying. Because it involves purchasing two at-the-money options, it is more expensive than some other strategies.ExampleConsider someone who expects a particular stock to experience large price fluctuations following an earnings announcement on Jan. 15. Currently, the stock’s price is $100.The investor creates a straddle by purchasing both a $5 put option and a $5 call option at a $100 strike price which expires on Jan. 30. The net option premium for this straddle is $10. The trader would realize a profit if the price of the underlying security was above $110 (which is the strike price plus the net option premium) or below $90 (which is the strike price minus the net option premium) at the time of expiration.Risk/rewardA long straddle can only lose a maximum of what you paid for it. Since it involves two options, however, it will cost more than either a call or put by itself. The maximum reward is theoretically unlimited to the upside and is bounded to the downside by the strike price (e.g., if you own a $20 straddle and the stock price goes to zero, you would make a max. of $20).Image by Julie Bang Â© Investopedia 2019Some Basic Other Options StrategiesThe strategies outlined here are straightforward and can be employed by most novice traders or investors. There are, however, more nuanced strategies than simply buying calls or puts. While we discuss many of these types of strategies elsewhere, here is just a brief list of some other basic options positions that would be suitable for those comfortable with the ones discussed above:Married put strategy: Similar to a protective put, themarried putinvolves buying anat-the-money (ATM)put option in an amount to cover an existing long position in the stock. In this way, it mimics a call option (sometimes called asynthetic call).Protective collar strategy: With aprotective collar, an investor who holds a long position in the underlying buys an out-of-the-money (i.e., downside) put option, while at the same time writing an out-of-the-money (upside) call option for the same stock.Long strangle strategy: Similar to the straddle, the buyer of astranglegoes long on an out-of-the-money call option and a put option at the same time. They will have the same expiration date, but they have different strike prices: The put strike price should be below the call strike price. This involves a lower outlay of premium than a straddle but also requires the stock to move either higher to the upside or lower to the downside in order to be profitable.Vertical Spreads: A vertical spread involves the simultaneous buying and selling of options of the same type (i.e., either puts or calls) and expiry, but at different strike prices. These can be constructed as either bull or bear spreads, which will profit when the market rises or falls, respectively. Spreads are less costly that a long call or long put since you are also receiving the options premium from the one you sold. However, this also limits your potential upside to the width between the strikes.Advantages and Disadvantages of Trading OptionsThe biggest advantage to buying options is that you have great upside potential with losses limited only to the option's premium. However, this can also be a drawback since options will expire worthless if the stock does not move enough to be in-the-money. This means that buying a lot of out-of-the-money options can be costly.Options can be very useful as a source of leverage and risk hedging. For example, a bullish investor who wishes to invest $1,000 in a company could potentially earn a far greater return by purchasing $1,000 worth of call options on that firm, as compared to buying $1,000 of that company’s shares. In this sense, the call options provide the investor with a way to leverage their position by increasing their buying power. On the other hand, if that same investor already has exposure to that same company and wants to reduce that exposure, they could hedge their risk by selling put options against that company.The main disadvantage of options contracts is that they are complex and difficult to price. This is why options are often considered a more advanced investment vehicle, suitable only for experienced investors. In recent years, they have become increasingly popular among retail investors. Because of their capacity for outsized returns or losses, investors should make sure they fully understand the potential implications before entering into any options positions. Failing to do so can lead to devastating losses.There is also a large risk selling options in that you take on theoretically unlimited risk with profits limited to the premium (price) received for the option.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":122,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9999061772,"gmtCreate":1660441334398,"gmtModify":1676533470546,"author":{"id":"3574915362300502","authorId":"3574915362300502","name":"Thunderbird","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/86528f4fb847fbbf69680f5b0c603119","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574915362300502","authorIdStr":"3574915362300502"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"It will come back&nbsp;","listText":"It will come back&nbsp;","text":"It will come back","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9999061772","repostId":"2259083078","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2259083078","pubTimestamp":1660440697,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2259083078?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-08-14 09:31","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Stock Market Recovery Faces a New Hurdle as Record Buybacks Slow","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2259083078","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"(Bloomberg) -- An end to corporate America’s record stock-buying spree is giving equity bulls one mo","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>(Bloomberg) -- An end to corporate America’s record stock-buying spree is giving equity bulls one more thing to worry about.</p><p>JPMorgan Chase &amp; Co., Citigroup Inc. and Best Buy Co Inc. all paused buyback plans when reporting their second-quarter results, deciding to hold on to cash instead as the Federal Reserve’s interest-rate hikes risk driving the economy into a recession. They’re among the 10 that have halted programs this year for reasons unrelated to M&amp;A -- a “very, very rare” phenomenon, according to Birinyi Associates.</p><p>The moves may be an early sign of a pullback from an era of record stock buybacks that erupted in the wake of the pandemic, when executives tapped cash hoards to purchase almost $1 trillion of their own shares. While analysts debate how much impact stock buybacks ultimately have, the retreat threatens to remove one crutch from a fragile market already contending with inflation and the specter of a global growth slowdown.</p><p>“Buybacks have been the largest source of US equity demand this year and a big support for stock markets,” said Mathieu Racheter, head of equity strategy at Julius Baer. “But buybacks are expected to slow from here amid a dimmer outlook for earnings and lower CEO confidence.”</p><p>By the end of the first quarter, US firms had spent just over $265 billion on buying back stock, a record amount, according to data from Barclays Plc. While repurchase announcements have still been strong year-to-date, some US firms “have used the second-quarter results to curtail existing buybacks on growth outlook concerns,” strategist Emmanuel Cau said.</p><p>JPMorgan Chief Executive Officer Jamie Dimon said the bank is taking a hiatus to meet higher capital requirements and allow flexibility for “a broad range of economic environments,” while reporting earnings that missed estimates. Citigroup also cited higher capital rules, saying it’s now in “capital-building mode.”</p><p>Other companies are also favoring using cash to bolster their businesses during a tough economic period.</p><p>Retailer Best Buy said it was pausing repurchases as part of its capital management strategy “in response to the current sales environment.” The company slashed its guidance and said inflation is pummeling consumers. And Starbucks Corp. founder Howard Schultz suspended the coffee chain’s buyback plan in April, saying the cash could be better spent on stores and staff.</p><h2>Tax Jitters</h2><p>The outlook for buybacks next year is even more uncertain, with a proposed tax on US stock repurchases expected to go into effect. Democrats are hoping that the 1% excise tax will slow the use of corporate buybacks, because they produce capital gains but no immediate tax bills.</p><p>That may open up a window for companies to pull forward their plans into the second half of this year. Still, strategists don’t expect this to provide a big prop to markets, given that overriding macroeconomic uncertainty will outweigh any positive sentiment from accelerated repurchases.</p><p>“Companies with clear guidance will likely try to front-load some of the buybacks, though it may not be as market-moving as some expect given the major macro drivers at the moment,” said Esty Dwek, chief investment officer at Flowbank SA.</p><p>Robert Cantwell, portfolio manager at Upholdings Group LLC in Nashville, agrees. “We don’t expect a ‘buyback rush’ in the second half since they are more dependent on share prices than a 1% tax,” he said. “The tax is more likely to depress share buybacks in favor of more M&amp;A or internal capex.”</p><p>But there’s some good news for those looking for a buyback boost: the stock market rebound since its June low may also reduce companies’ need to support their shares through repurchases.</p><p>“Equity market prices have been recovering strongly over the last month and buybacks should absolutely slow down as a result,” Cantwell said. “Slowing buybacks can be a sign of a strong market, as opposed to a weak one.”</p></body></html>","source":"yahoofinance","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Stock Market Recovery Faces a New Hurdle as Record Buybacks Slow</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nStock Market Recovery Faces a New Hurdle as Record Buybacks Slow\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-08-14 09:31 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/stock-market-recovery-faces-hurdle-180000861.html><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>(Bloomberg) -- An end to corporate America’s record stock-buying spree is giving equity bulls one more thing to worry about.JPMorgan Chase & Co., Citigroup Inc. and Best Buy Co Inc. all paused buyback...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/stock-market-recovery-faces-hurdle-180000861.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BBY":"百思买","BK4570":"地缘局势概念股","NGD":"New Gold","BK4017":"黄金"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/stock-market-recovery-faces-hurdle-180000861.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5f26f4a48f9cb3e29be4d71d3ba8c038","article_id":"2259083078","content_text":"(Bloomberg) -- An end to corporate America’s record stock-buying spree is giving equity bulls one more thing to worry about.JPMorgan Chase & Co., Citigroup Inc. and Best Buy Co Inc. all paused buyback plans when reporting their second-quarter results, deciding to hold on to cash instead as the Federal Reserve’s interest-rate hikes risk driving the economy into a recession. They’re among the 10 that have halted programs this year for reasons unrelated to M&A -- a “very, very rare” phenomenon, according to Birinyi Associates.The moves may be an early sign of a pullback from an era of record stock buybacks that erupted in the wake of the pandemic, when executives tapped cash hoards to purchase almost $1 trillion of their own shares. While analysts debate how much impact stock buybacks ultimately have, the retreat threatens to remove one crutch from a fragile market already contending with inflation and the specter of a global growth slowdown.“Buybacks have been the largest source of US equity demand this year and a big support for stock markets,” said Mathieu Racheter, head of equity strategy at Julius Baer. “But buybacks are expected to slow from here amid a dimmer outlook for earnings and lower CEO confidence.”By the end of the first quarter, US firms had spent just over $265 billion on buying back stock, a record amount, according to data from Barclays Plc. While repurchase announcements have still been strong year-to-date, some US firms “have used the second-quarter results to curtail existing buybacks on growth outlook concerns,” strategist Emmanuel Cau said.JPMorgan Chief Executive Officer Jamie Dimon said the bank is taking a hiatus to meet higher capital requirements and allow flexibility for “a broad range of economic environments,” while reporting earnings that missed estimates. Citigroup also cited higher capital rules, saying it’s now in “capital-building mode.”Other companies are also favoring using cash to bolster their businesses during a tough economic period.Retailer Best Buy said it was pausing repurchases as part of its capital management strategy “in response to the current sales environment.” The company slashed its guidance and said inflation is pummeling consumers. And Starbucks Corp. founder Howard Schultz suspended the coffee chain’s buyback plan in April, saying the cash could be better spent on stores and staff.Tax JittersThe outlook for buybacks next year is even more uncertain, with a proposed tax on US stock repurchases expected to go into effect. Democrats are hoping that the 1% excise tax will slow the use of corporate buybacks, because they produce capital gains but no immediate tax bills.That may open up a window for companies to pull forward their plans into the second half of this year. Still, strategists don’t expect this to provide a big prop to markets, given that overriding macroeconomic uncertainty will outweigh any positive sentiment from accelerated repurchases.“Companies with clear guidance will likely try to front-load some of the buybacks, though it may not be as market-moving as some expect given the major macro drivers at the moment,” said Esty Dwek, chief investment officer at Flowbank SA.Robert Cantwell, portfolio manager at Upholdings Group LLC in Nashville, agrees. “We don’t expect a ‘buyback rush’ in the second half since they are more dependent on share prices than a 1% tax,” he said. “The tax is more likely to depress share buybacks in favor of more M&A or internal capex.”But there’s some good news for those looking for a buyback boost: the stock market rebound since its June low may also reduce companies’ need to support their shares through repurchases.“Equity market prices have been recovering strongly over the last month and buybacks should absolutely slow down as a result,” Cantwell said. “Slowing buybacks can be a sign of a strong market, as opposed to a weak one.”","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":112,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9999063739,"gmtCreate":1660441301124,"gmtModify":1676533470522,"author":{"id":"3574915362300502","authorId":"3574915362300502","name":"Thunderbird","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/86528f4fb847fbbf69680f5b0c603119","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574915362300502","authorIdStr":"3574915362300502"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hope the sept cpi is below expectations too","listText":"Hope the sept cpi is below expectations too","text":"Hope the sept cpi is below expectations too","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9999063739","repostId":"2259349706","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2259349706","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1660440324,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2259349706?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-08-14 09:25","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Inflation Surge Cools in July. Should You Still Play Defense with Your Portfolio?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2259349706","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"Investors hopeful about a potential retreat in U.S. inflation from its highest levels in decades hav","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Investors hopeful about a potential retreat in U.S. inflation from its highest levels in decades have been piling into stocks, even as several high-profile investors warn the rally may be a mirage.</p><p>The latest surge in stocks helped lift the Nasdaq Composite out of bear-market territory on Wednesday and the Dow Jones Industrial Average  to exit correction territory. But the sharp upswing also prompted debate about if investors should adjust their portfolios, pivoting away from defense plays.</p><p>For the past month, growth stocks in general outperformed their value counterparts. The Russell 1000 Growth Index  advanced 13%, while the Russell 1000 Value Index  gained 9.5%, according  to Dow Jones Market data. Cathie Wood&#39;s tech-heavy <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ARKK\">ARK Innovation ETF</a> (ARKK) rose 10% in the past month, topping the 8.3% gain of Warren Buffett&#39;s Berkshire Hathaway (BRKA) shares for the same period.</p><p>Liz Young, head of investment strategy at SoFi, said investors should consider being in the market and out of cash by the end of summer, though she remains skeptical of the quick rise of stocks since mid-June. &#34;In the case of the Fed&#39;s current goal, markets are starting to believe in the possibility of a soft landing,&#34; Young wrote in a Thursday note.</p><p>However, that&#39;s not what the bond market has been signaling, said Nancy Davis, portfolio manager of the Quadratic Interest Rate Volatility and Inflation Hedge Exchange-Traded Fund <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/IVOL\">$(IVOL)$</a>. The yield of 2-year Treasury note remains higher than that of the 10-year treasury bond.  &#34;It&#39;s a substantial inversion,&#34; Davis noted. &#34;It&#39;s really the market pricing the low- growth kind of bad scenario.&#34;</p><p>Helping to fuel risk appetite, the U.S. consumer-price index was unchanged in July, the Labor Department said Wednesday, compared with the 1.3% gain in the prior month. Economists polled by The Wall Street Journal had estimated a 0.2% advance in July.</p><p>A day later, the U.S. producer-price index fell 0.5% in July, the first negative monthly print since April 2020. That&#39;s compared with a 1% jump in June. Economists polled by The Wall Street Journal had forecast a 0.2% advance.</p><h2>A diversified portfolio?</h2><p>Mark Heppenstall, president and chief investment officer at Penn Mutual Asset Management, said that as long as inflation continues to trend lower, the classic 60/40 portfolio, with 60% invested in stocks and 40% in bonds, will continue to provide reasonable returns.</p><p>&#34;In most market environments, it&#39;s helpful to have broad and balanced exposure,&#34; said Brian Storey, senior portfolio manager at Brinker Capital Investments.</p><p>Storey suggested that investors consider adding high-quality stocks to their portfolio. For investors with a risk posture that&#39;s a little more conservative, Storey encourages them to look outside of equity markets. &#34;Some investment-grade fixed-income corporate bonds, or even some noncore fixed-income, like high-yield bonds, bank loans or emerging-market debt -- those are areas [where] spreads widened a lot,&#34; Storey said.</p><p>&#34;Given that there doesn&#39;t seem to be any extreme areas of stress in financial markets over the next six-to-12 months, those are areas that should see some fairly attractive returns, particularly compared to US Treasurys,&#34; Storey said.</p><h2>Growth vs. Value Stocks</h2><p>Still, Storey has been skeptical about whether the recent rally led by growth stocks is sustainable, given that it has been partly driven by the fall in the 10-year treasury yield.</p><p>The 10-year Treasury  advanced modestly for the week to 2.848% on Friday, still below its 3.482% high in June.</p><p>&#34;I think now that we&#39;re gonna see treasury yields a little bit more range bound,&#34; said Storey. &#34;So I think that the decline in yields that has been a catalyst for those Nasdaq stocks is probably not going to be as much of a tailwind in the future.&#34;</p><p>Even if the stock rally continues, &#34;I don&#39;t think that people are going to be going back to the same kind of leadership names,&#34; said Stephen Hoedt, managing director at equity and fixed income research at Key Private Bank. While the rally since June has been led by some &#34;unprofitable technology companies,&#34; the market is likely to gravitate for leadership of high quality growth companies, such as some in healthcare and consumer discretionary, Hoedt noted.</p><p>&#34;You just can&#39;t put money to work in technology willy-nilly right now. Because there still are significant valuation concerns,&#34; Hoedt said. &#34;And the fact that we&#39;re in a higher interest rate environment is a headwind for companies that do not have earnings or have more difficult profitability than others.&#34;</p><h2>More rate hikes</h2><p>Next week, investors will be focused on initial jobless claims data and existing home sales number.</p><p>Later this month, the Fed will hold its Jackson Hole Economic Symposium, which could be the next major catalyst for market movements, analysts said.</p><p>&#34;There are a lot of hawkish expectations from the forward guidance,&#34; Quadratic&#39;s Davis said. While the Fed has raised interest rates by 225 basis points already this year, the market is pricing in an additional 117 basis points of hikes to come for the rest of the year, Davis noted.</p><p>She will be tuned into the Jackson Hole summit for any talk about how the Fed officials plan to use the central bank&#39;s balance sheet as a monetary policy tool to fight inflation.</p><p>For the past week, the Dow added 2.9% to around 33,761.05. The S&amp;P 500  gained 3.3% to 4,280.15, and the Nasdaq rose 3.1% to 13,047.19.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Inflation Surge Cools in July. Should You Still Play Defense with Your Portfolio?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nInflation Surge Cools in July. Should You Still Play Defense with Your Portfolio?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-08-14 09:25</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>Investors hopeful about a potential retreat in U.S. inflation from its highest levels in decades have been piling into stocks, even as several high-profile investors warn the rally may be a mirage.</p><p>The latest surge in stocks helped lift the Nasdaq Composite out of bear-market territory on Wednesday and the Dow Jones Industrial Average  to exit correction territory. But the sharp upswing also prompted debate about if investors should adjust their portfolios, pivoting away from defense plays.</p><p>For the past month, growth stocks in general outperformed their value counterparts. The Russell 1000 Growth Index  advanced 13%, while the Russell 1000 Value Index  gained 9.5%, according  to Dow Jones Market data. Cathie Wood&#39;s tech-heavy <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ARKK\">ARK Innovation ETF</a> (ARKK) rose 10% in the past month, topping the 8.3% gain of Warren Buffett&#39;s Berkshire Hathaway (BRKA) shares for the same period.</p><p>Liz Young, head of investment strategy at SoFi, said investors should consider being in the market and out of cash by the end of summer, though she remains skeptical of the quick rise of stocks since mid-June. &#34;In the case of the Fed&#39;s current goal, markets are starting to believe in the possibility of a soft landing,&#34; Young wrote in a Thursday note.</p><p>However, that&#39;s not what the bond market has been signaling, said Nancy Davis, portfolio manager of the Quadratic Interest Rate Volatility and Inflation Hedge Exchange-Traded Fund <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/IVOL\">$(IVOL)$</a>. The yield of 2-year Treasury note remains higher than that of the 10-year treasury bond.  &#34;It&#39;s a substantial inversion,&#34; Davis noted. &#34;It&#39;s really the market pricing the low- growth kind of bad scenario.&#34;</p><p>Helping to fuel risk appetite, the U.S. consumer-price index was unchanged in July, the Labor Department said Wednesday, compared with the 1.3% gain in the prior month. Economists polled by The Wall Street Journal had estimated a 0.2% advance in July.</p><p>A day later, the U.S. producer-price index fell 0.5% in July, the first negative monthly print since April 2020. That&#39;s compared with a 1% jump in June. Economists polled by The Wall Street Journal had forecast a 0.2% advance.</p><h2>A diversified portfolio?</h2><p>Mark Heppenstall, president and chief investment officer at Penn Mutual Asset Management, said that as long as inflation continues to trend lower, the classic 60/40 portfolio, with 60% invested in stocks and 40% in bonds, will continue to provide reasonable returns.</p><p>&#34;In most market environments, it&#39;s helpful to have broad and balanced exposure,&#34; said Brian Storey, senior portfolio manager at Brinker Capital Investments.</p><p>Storey suggested that investors consider adding high-quality stocks to their portfolio. For investors with a risk posture that&#39;s a little more conservative, Storey encourages them to look outside of equity markets. &#34;Some investment-grade fixed-income corporate bonds, or even some noncore fixed-income, like high-yield bonds, bank loans or emerging-market debt -- those are areas [where] spreads widened a lot,&#34; Storey said.</p><p>&#34;Given that there doesn&#39;t seem to be any extreme areas of stress in financial markets over the next six-to-12 months, those are areas that should see some fairly attractive returns, particularly compared to US Treasurys,&#34; Storey said.</p><h2>Growth vs. Value Stocks</h2><p>Still, Storey has been skeptical about whether the recent rally led by growth stocks is sustainable, given that it has been partly driven by the fall in the 10-year treasury yield.</p><p>The 10-year Treasury  advanced modestly for the week to 2.848% on Friday, still below its 3.482% high in June.</p><p>&#34;I think now that we&#39;re gonna see treasury yields a little bit more range bound,&#34; said Storey. &#34;So I think that the decline in yields that has been a catalyst for those Nasdaq stocks is probably not going to be as much of a tailwind in the future.&#34;</p><p>Even if the stock rally continues, &#34;I don&#39;t think that people are going to be going back to the same kind of leadership names,&#34; said Stephen Hoedt, managing director at equity and fixed income research at Key Private Bank. While the rally since June has been led by some &#34;unprofitable technology companies,&#34; the market is likely to gravitate for leadership of high quality growth companies, such as some in healthcare and consumer discretionary, Hoedt noted.</p><p>&#34;You just can&#39;t put money to work in technology willy-nilly right now. Because there still are significant valuation concerns,&#34; Hoedt said. &#34;And the fact that we&#39;re in a higher interest rate environment is a headwind for companies that do not have earnings or have more difficult profitability than others.&#34;</p><h2>More rate hikes</h2><p>Next week, investors will be focused on initial jobless claims data and existing home sales number.</p><p>Later this month, the Fed will hold its Jackson Hole Economic Symposium, which could be the next major catalyst for market movements, analysts said.</p><p>&#34;There are a lot of hawkish expectations from the forward guidance,&#34; Quadratic&#39;s Davis said. While the Fed has raised interest rates by 225 basis points already this year, the market is pricing in an additional 117 basis points of hikes to come for the rest of the year, Davis noted.</p><p>She will be tuned into the Jackson Hole summit for any talk about how the Fed officials plan to use the central bank&#39;s balance sheet as a monetary policy tool to fight inflation.</p><p>For the past week, the Dow added 2.9% to around 33,761.05. The S&amp;P 500  gained 3.3% to 4,280.15, and the Nasdaq rose 3.1% to 13,047.19.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BRK.B":"伯克希尔B","BK4544":"ARK ETF合集","BK4533":"AQR资本管理(全球第二大对冲基金)","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","BK4176":"多领域控股","IVOL":"Quadratic Interest Rate Volatility and Inflation Hedge ETF","BK4581":"高盛持仓","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓","ARKK":"ARK Innovation ETF"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2259349706","content_text":"Investors hopeful about a potential retreat in U.S. inflation from its highest levels in decades have been piling into stocks, even as several high-profile investors warn the rally may be a mirage.The latest surge in stocks helped lift the Nasdaq Composite out of bear-market territory on Wednesday and the Dow Jones Industrial Average  to exit correction territory. But the sharp upswing also prompted debate about if investors should adjust their portfolios, pivoting away from defense plays.For the past month, growth stocks in general outperformed their value counterparts. The Russell 1000 Growth Index  advanced 13%, while the Russell 1000 Value Index  gained 9.5%, according  to Dow Jones Market data. Cathie Wood's tech-heavy ARK Innovation ETF (ARKK) rose 10% in the past month, topping the 8.3% gain of Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway (BRKA) shares for the same period.Liz Young, head of investment strategy at SoFi, said investors should consider being in the market and out of cash by the end of summer, though she remains skeptical of the quick rise of stocks since mid-June. \"In the case of the Fed's current goal, markets are starting to believe in the possibility of a soft landing,\" Young wrote in a Thursday note.However, that's not what the bond market has been signaling, said Nancy Davis, portfolio manager of the Quadratic Interest Rate Volatility and Inflation Hedge Exchange-Traded Fund $(IVOL)$. The yield of 2-year Treasury note remains higher than that of the 10-year treasury bond.  \"It's a substantial inversion,\" Davis noted. \"It's really the market pricing the low- growth kind of bad scenario.\"Helping to fuel risk appetite, the U.S. consumer-price index was unchanged in July, the Labor Department said Wednesday, compared with the 1.3% gain in the prior month. Economists polled by The Wall Street Journal had estimated a 0.2% advance in July.A day later, the U.S. producer-price index fell 0.5% in July, the first negative monthly print since April 2020. That's compared with a 1% jump in June. Economists polled by The Wall Street Journal had forecast a 0.2% advance.A diversified portfolio?Mark Heppenstall, president and chief investment officer at Penn Mutual Asset Management, said that as long as inflation continues to trend lower, the classic 60/40 portfolio, with 60% invested in stocks and 40% in bonds, will continue to provide reasonable returns.\"In most market environments, it's helpful to have broad and balanced exposure,\" said Brian Storey, senior portfolio manager at Brinker Capital Investments.Storey suggested that investors consider adding high-quality stocks to their portfolio. For investors with a risk posture that's a little more conservative, Storey encourages them to look outside of equity markets. \"Some investment-grade fixed-income corporate bonds, or even some noncore fixed-income, like high-yield bonds, bank loans or emerging-market debt -- those are areas [where] spreads widened a lot,\" Storey said.\"Given that there doesn't seem to be any extreme areas of stress in financial markets over the next six-to-12 months, those are areas that should see some fairly attractive returns, particularly compared to US Treasurys,\" Storey said.Growth vs. Value StocksStill, Storey has been skeptical about whether the recent rally led by growth stocks is sustainable, given that it has been partly driven by the fall in the 10-year treasury yield.The 10-year Treasury  advanced modestly for the week to 2.848% on Friday, still below its 3.482% high in June.\"I think now that we're gonna see treasury yields a little bit more range bound,\" said Storey. \"So I think that the decline in yields that has been a catalyst for those Nasdaq stocks is probably not going to be as much of a tailwind in the future.\"Even if the stock rally continues, \"I don't think that people are going to be going back to the same kind of leadership names,\" said Stephen Hoedt, managing director at equity and fixed income research at Key Private Bank. While the rally since June has been led by some \"unprofitable technology companies,\" the market is likely to gravitate for leadership of high quality growth companies, such as some in healthcare and consumer discretionary, Hoedt noted.\"You just can't put money to work in technology willy-nilly right now. Because there still are significant valuation concerns,\" Hoedt said. \"And the fact that we're in a higher interest rate environment is a headwind for companies that do not have earnings or have more difficult profitability than others.\"More rate hikesNext week, investors will be focused on initial jobless claims data and existing home sales number.Later this month, the Fed will hold its Jackson Hole Economic Symposium, which could be the next major catalyst for market movements, analysts said.\"There are a lot of hawkish expectations from the forward guidance,\" Quadratic's Davis said. While the Fed has raised interest rates by 225 basis points already this year, the market is pricing in an additional 117 basis points of hikes to come for the rest of the year, Davis noted.She will be tuned into the Jackson Hole summit for any talk about how the Fed officials plan to use the central bank's balance sheet as a monetary policy tool to fight inflation.For the past week, the Dow added 2.9% to around 33,761.05. The S&P 500  gained 3.3% to 4,280.15, and the Nasdaq rose 3.1% to 13,047.19.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":4175,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9990515981,"gmtCreate":1660366716246,"gmtModify":1676533460556,"author":{"id":"3574915362300502","authorId":"3574915362300502","name":"Thunderbird","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/86528f4fb847fbbf69680f5b0c603119","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574915362300502","authorIdStr":"3574915362300502"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Let's cheer too!","listText":"Let's cheer too!","text":"Let's cheer too!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9990515981","repostId":"1129150866","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1129150866","pubTimestamp":1660352614,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1129150866?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-08-13 09:03","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why Stock Market Bulls Are Cheering the S&P 500’s Close above 4,231","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1129150866","media":"MarketWatch","summary":"Many technical analysts pay attention to what’s known as the Fibonacci ratio, attributed to a 13th century Italian mathematician known as Leonardo “Fibonacci” of Pisa. It’s based on a sequence of whole numbers in which the sum of two adjacent numbers equals the next highest number (0,1,1,2,3,5,8,13, 21…","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e150d7de731c2e2e0ebee4395029900d\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>The S&amp;P 500 index on Friday finished above a chart level that delivered a dose of encouragement to stock-market bulls arguing that the U.S. bear-market bottom is in, though technical analysts warned that it might not be a signal to go all in on equities.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 on Friday rose 1.7% to close at 4,280.15. The finish above 4,231 would mean the large-cap benchmark has recovered — or retraced — more than 50% of its fall from a Jan. 3 record finish at 4796.56.</p><p>“Since 1950 there has never been a bear market rally that exceeded the 50% retracement and then gone on to make new cycle lows,” said Jonathan Krinsky, chief market technician at BTIG, in a note earlier this month.</p><p>Stocks rose across the board Friday, with the S&amp;P 500 booking a fourth straight weekly gain. The Dow Jones Industrial Average advanced more than 420 points, or 1.3%, on Friday and the Nasdaq Composite rose 2.1%. The S&amp;P 500 attempted to complete the retracement in Thursday’s session, when it traded as high as 4,257.91, but gave up gains to end at 4,207.27.</p><p>Krinsky, in a Thursday update, had noted that an intraday breach of the level doesn’t cut it, but had cautioned that a close above 4,231 would still leave him cautious about the near-term outlook.</p><p>“Because the retracement is based on a closing basis, we would want to see a close above 4,231 to trigger that signal. Whether or not that happens, however, the tactical risk/reward looks poor to us here,” he wrote.</p><p>What’s so special about a 50% retracement? Many technical analysts pay attention to what’s known as the Fibonacci ratio, attributed to a 13th century Italian mathematician known as Leonardo “Fibonacci” of Pisa. It’s based on a sequence of whole numbers in which the sum of two adjacent numbers equals the next highest number (0,1,1,2,3,5,8,13, 21…).</p><p>If a number in the sequence is divided by the next number, for example 8 divided by 13, the result is near 0.618, a ratio that’s been dubbed the Golden Mean due to its prevalence in nature in everything from seashells to ocean waves to proportions of the human body. Back on Wall Street, technical analysts see key retracement targets for a rally from a significant low to a significant peak at 38.2%, 50% and 61.8%, while retracements of 23.6% and 76.4% are seen as secondary targets.</p><p>The push above the 50% retracement level during Thursday’s recession may have contributed to a round of selling itself, said Jeff deGraaf, founder of Renaissance Macro Research, in a Friday note.</p><p>He observed that the retracement corresponded to a 65-day high for the S&amp;P 500, offering another indication of an improving trend in a bear market as it represents the highest level of the last rolling quarter. A 65-day high is often seen as a default signal for commodity trading advisers, not just in the S&amp;P 500 but in commodity, bond and forex markets as well.</p><p>“That level coincidentally corresponded with the 50% retracement level of the bear market,” he wrote. “In essence, it forced the hand of one group to cover shorts (CTAs) while simultaneously giving another group (Fibonacci followers) an excuse to sell” on Thursday.</p><p>Krinsky, meanwhile, cautioned that previous 50% retracements in 1974, 2004, and 2009 all saw decent shakeouts shortly after clearing that threshold.</p><p>“Further, as the market has cheered ‘peak inflation’, we are now seeing a quiet resurgence in many commodities, and bonds continue to weaken,” he wrote Thursday.</p></body></html>","source":"lsy1603348471595","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why Stock Market Bulls Are Cheering the S&P 500’s Close above 4,231</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy Stock Market Bulls Are Cheering the S&P 500’s Close above 4,231\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-08-13 09:03 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.marketwatch.com/story/why-stock-market-bulls-are-obsessed-with-the-4-231-level-for-the-s-p-500-11660309355?mod=home-page><strong>MarketWatch</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The S&P 500 index on Friday finished above a chart level that delivered a dose of encouragement to stock-market bulls arguing that the U.S. bear-market bottom is in, though technical analysts warned ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/why-stock-market-bulls-are-obsessed-with-the-4-231-level-for-the-s-p-500-11660309355?mod=home-page\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index"},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/why-stock-market-bulls-are-obsessed-with-the-4-231-level-for-the-s-p-500-11660309355?mod=home-page","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1129150866","content_text":"The S&P 500 index on Friday finished above a chart level that delivered a dose of encouragement to stock-market bulls arguing that the U.S. bear-market bottom is in, though technical analysts warned that it might not be a signal to go all in on equities.The S&P 500 on Friday rose 1.7% to close at 4,280.15. The finish above 4,231 would mean the large-cap benchmark has recovered — or retraced — more than 50% of its fall from a Jan. 3 record finish at 4796.56.“Since 1950 there has never been a bear market rally that exceeded the 50% retracement and then gone on to make new cycle lows,” said Jonathan Krinsky, chief market technician at BTIG, in a note earlier this month.Stocks rose across the board Friday, with the S&P 500 booking a fourth straight weekly gain. The Dow Jones Industrial Average advanced more than 420 points, or 1.3%, on Friday and the Nasdaq Composite rose 2.1%. The S&P 500 attempted to complete the retracement in Thursday’s session, when it traded as high as 4,257.91, but gave up gains to end at 4,207.27.Krinsky, in a Thursday update, had noted that an intraday breach of the level doesn’t cut it, but had cautioned that a close above 4,231 would still leave him cautious about the near-term outlook.“Because the retracement is based on a closing basis, we would want to see a close above 4,231 to trigger that signal. Whether or not that happens, however, the tactical risk/reward looks poor to us here,” he wrote.What’s so special about a 50% retracement? Many technical analysts pay attention to what’s known as the Fibonacci ratio, attributed to a 13th century Italian mathematician known as Leonardo “Fibonacci” of Pisa. It’s based on a sequence of whole numbers in which the sum of two adjacent numbers equals the next highest number (0,1,1,2,3,5,8,13, 21…).If a number in the sequence is divided by the next number, for example 8 divided by 13, the result is near 0.618, a ratio that’s been dubbed the Golden Mean due to its prevalence in nature in everything from seashells to ocean waves to proportions of the human body. Back on Wall Street, technical analysts see key retracement targets for a rally from a significant low to a significant peak at 38.2%, 50% and 61.8%, while retracements of 23.6% and 76.4% are seen as secondary targets.The push above the 50% retracement level during Thursday’s recession may have contributed to a round of selling itself, said Jeff deGraaf, founder of Renaissance Macro Research, in a Friday note.He observed that the retracement corresponded to a 65-day high for the S&P 500, offering another indication of an improving trend in a bear market as it represents the highest level of the last rolling quarter. A 65-day high is often seen as a default signal for commodity trading advisers, not just in the S&P 500 but in commodity, bond and forex markets as well.“That level coincidentally corresponded with the 50% retracement level of the bear market,” he wrote. “In essence, it forced the hand of one group to cover shorts (CTAs) while simultaneously giving another group (Fibonacci followers) an excuse to sell” on Thursday.Krinsky, meanwhile, cautioned that previous 50% retracements in 1974, 2004, and 2009 all saw decent shakeouts shortly after clearing that threshold.“Further, as the market has cheered ‘peak inflation’, we are now seeing a quiet resurgence in many commodities, and bonds continue to weaken,” he wrote Thursday.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":63,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":803303493,"gmtCreate":1627406783312,"gmtModify":1703489402789,"author":{"id":"3574915362300502","authorId":"3574915362300502","name":"Thunderbird","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/86528f4fb847fbbf69680f5b0c603119","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3574915362300502","idStr":"3574915362300502"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Tesla is more than a company, it’s an idea, a vision.","listText":"Tesla is more than a company, it’s an idea, a vision.","text":"Tesla is more than a company, it’s an idea, a vision.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":14,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/803303493","repostId":"1124516451","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1124516451","pubTimestamp":1627397263,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1124516451?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-27 22:47","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Tesla Is a Mature Business. Don’t Look Now.","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1124516451","media":"Barrons","summary":"The electric-vehicle company Tesla reported its best quarterly results ever Monday evening, but investors and analysts are greeting the news with measured optimism—a sign that Tesla is maturing as a company.Tesla  reported $1.45 in adjusted per-share earnings for the second quarter, far higher than the roughly 95 cents analysts were looking for. Sales from regulatory credits—a source of revenue seen as less sustainable than sales of vehicles—-fell, but operating profits rose to record highs beca","content":"<p>The electric-vehicle company&nbsp;Tesla&nbsp;reported its&nbsp;best quarterly results&nbsp;ever Monday evening, but investors and analysts are greeting the news with measured optimism—a sign that Tesla is maturing as a company.</p>\n<p>Tesla (ticker: TSLA)&nbsp;reported&nbsp;$1.45 in adjusted per-share earnings for the second quarter, far higher than the roughly 95 cents analysts were looking for. Sales from regulatory credits—a source of revenue seen as less sustainable than sales of vehicles—-fell, but operating profits rose to record highs because of strong profitability in the automotive division.</p>\n<p>Tesla generates the credits by making more than its fair share of zero- emission cars and sells them to manufacturers that still rely on internal-combustion engines. Pessimists on the stock believe that source of income will dwindle over time.</p>\n<p>The stock, however, was down 1.5% in early trading Tuesday. The&nbsp;S&amp;P 500&nbsp;and&nbsp;Dow Jones Industrial Average,for comparison, had fallen 0.6% and 0.4%, respectively.</p>\n<p>It is a muted reaction to a good quarter, typical of the way stocks of mature businesses behave. Tesla stock moved more than 10% in response to three of the four 2019 quarterly reports. But it rose or fell an average of about 2.5% in response to the 2020 earnings reports.</p>\n<p>The typical 2020 move was a fall in the price in response to news of better-than-expected results. The same thing happened after the release of results for the first quarter of 2021.</p>\n<p>That is another sign of maturity. A small drop in response to better-than-expected results is the typical outcome for stocks. Investors always expect companies to exceed analyst projections, and when they get that result, they “sell the news.”</p>\n<p>The reaction among Wall Street analysts to the latest results is yet another sign of maturity. Mizuho analyst&nbsp;Vijay Rakesh&nbsp;raised his target for Tesla’s stock price by $5 to $825 following the news, for a bump of less than 1%.</p>\n<p>Back in January, RBC analyst&nbsp;Joe Spak&nbsp;raised his target price to $700 a share from $339 after changing how he thought about Tesla’s business. That was a huge target-price change from a large broker.</p>\n<p>Smaller changes in price targets can indicate a business is becoming more stable, and that analysts believe they have a grip on what is happening. That reduces the need for them to dramatically overhaul their views in response to events.</p>\n<p>Overall, the average&nbsp;analyst target price&nbsp;is up about $18, or 3%, in reaction to Monday’s results to about $644 a share. Tesla shares are trading about 1% or 2% above the average analyst target price.</p>\n<p>Target prices generally reflect where analysts think a stock should trade to earn a fair return out into the future. The average target price on stocks in the S&amp;P 500 implies a gain of 7%.</p>\n<p>Even the fact that Tesla is trading around its average analyst target price is a sign of maturity. A year ago, the average target price for Tesla stock was about $225, while the price was above $300.</p>\n<p>Shareholders and bulls on the stock might like a bigger response from the stock when earnings come in strong, but the days of 20% moves, up or down, might be gone for Tesla. That is more evidence that Tesla is here to stay as the world’s most valuable car company.</p>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Tesla Is a Mature Business. Don’t Look Now.</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTesla Is a Mature Business. Don’t Look Now.\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-27 22:47 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.barrons.com/articles/tesla-stock-mature-business-51627393369?mod=hp_LEADSUPP_1><strong>Barrons</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The electric-vehicle company Tesla reported its best quarterly results ever Monday evening, but investors and analysts are greeting the news with measured optimism—a sign that Tesla is maturing as a ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/tesla-stock-mature-business-51627393369?mod=hp_LEADSUPP_1\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/tesla-stock-mature-business-51627393369?mod=hp_LEADSUPP_1","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1124516451","content_text":"The electric-vehicle company Tesla reported its best quarterly results ever Monday evening, but investors and analysts are greeting the news with measured optimism—a sign that Tesla is maturing as a company.\nTesla (ticker: TSLA) reported $1.45 in adjusted per-share earnings for the second quarter, far higher than the roughly 95 cents analysts were looking for. Sales from regulatory credits—a source of revenue seen as less sustainable than sales of vehicles—-fell, but operating profits rose to record highs because of strong profitability in the automotive division.\nTesla generates the credits by making more than its fair share of zero- emission cars and sells them to manufacturers that still rely on internal-combustion engines. Pessimists on the stock believe that source of income will dwindle over time.\nThe stock, however, was down 1.5% in early trading Tuesday. The S&P 500 and Dow Jones Industrial Average,for comparison, had fallen 0.6% and 0.4%, respectively.\nIt is a muted reaction to a good quarter, typical of the way stocks of mature businesses behave. Tesla stock moved more than 10% in response to three of the four 2019 quarterly reports. But it rose or fell an average of about 2.5% in response to the 2020 earnings reports.\nThe typical 2020 move was a fall in the price in response to news of better-than-expected results. The same thing happened after the release of results for the first quarter of 2021.\nThat is another sign of maturity. A small drop in response to better-than-expected results is the typical outcome for stocks. Investors always expect companies to exceed analyst projections, and when they get that result, they “sell the news.”\nThe reaction among Wall Street analysts to the latest results is yet another sign of maturity. Mizuho analyst Vijay Rakesh raised his target for Tesla’s stock price by $5 to $825 following the news, for a bump of less than 1%.\nBack in January, RBC analyst Joe Spak raised his target price to $700 a share from $339 after changing how he thought about Tesla’s business. That was a huge target-price change from a large broker.\nSmaller changes in price targets can indicate a business is becoming more stable, and that analysts believe they have a grip on what is happening. That reduces the need for them to dramatically overhaul their views in response to events.\nOverall, the average analyst target price is up about $18, or 3%, in reaction to Monday’s results to about $644 a share. Tesla shares are trading about 1% or 2% above the average analyst target price.\nTarget prices generally reflect where analysts think a stock should trade to earn a fair return out into the future. The average target price on stocks in the S&P 500 implies a gain of 7%.\nEven the fact that Tesla is trading around its average analyst target price is a sign of maturity. A year ago, the average target price for Tesla stock was about $225, while the price was above $300.\nShareholders and bulls on the stock might like a bigger response from the stock when earnings come in strong, but the days of 20% moves, up or down, might be gone for Tesla. That is more evidence that Tesla is here to stay as the world’s most valuable car company.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":294,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9912936278,"gmtCreate":1664731543894,"gmtModify":1676537499128,"author":{"id":"3574915362300502","authorId":"3574915362300502","name":"Thunderbird","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/86528f4fb847fbbf69680f5b0c603119","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3574915362300502","idStr":"3574915362300502"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Not sure if I dare to buy now","listText":"Not sure if I dare to buy now","text":"Not sure if I dare to buy now","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":8,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9912936278","repostId":"1157459217","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":486,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":806304321,"gmtCreate":1627630121763,"gmtModify":1703493700357,"author":{"id":"3574915362300502","authorId":"3574915362300502","name":"Thunderbird","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/86528f4fb847fbbf69680f5b0c603119","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3574915362300502","idStr":"3574915362300502"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Looks like semi con still has some room to run!","listText":"Looks like semi con still has some room to run!","text":"Looks like semi con still has some room to run!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/806304321","repostId":"1158887749","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1158887749","pubTimestamp":1627630019,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1158887749?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-30 15:26","market":"us","language":"en","title":"SoftBank Leads $200 Million Investment In Semiconductor Startup, Boosts Logistics Chip Space","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1158887749","media":"Forbes","summary":"A $200 million funding round led by Japanese billionaire Masayoshi Son’s Softbank Group Corp gave a ","content":"<p>A $200 million funding round led by Japanese billionaire&nbsp;Masayoshi Son’s <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SFTBY\">Softbank Group Corp</a> gave a little-known California-based semiconductor startup a boost in the nascent logistics chip space.</p>\n<p>SoftBank Group’s Vision Fund 2&nbsp;led&nbsp;the investment in Wiliot, a four-year-old startup with presence in Australia, Germany, Israel, Taiwan and Ukraine. Previous investors include <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMZN\">Amazon.com</a> Web Services and the venture capital arms of Samsung and Japanese mobile carrier NTT Docomo.</p>\n<p>SoftBank’s investment marks a boost for Wiliot, says Mario Morales, group vice president of enabling technologies and semiconductors at market research firm IDC. “Most of these guys have gotten not as much funding as this one,” he notes. “Most of them are running out of money.”</p>\n<p>Wiliot, whose stamp-sized chips are designed to allow object identification on a mass scale, could benefit from cross-pollination with the Vision Fund portfolio’s e-commerce and logistics companies, analysts say.</p>\n<p>“Vision Fund is spraying billions of dollars on tech firms, and the flow of cash appears almost limitless,” says Neil Mawston, executive director at Strategy Analytics. “Wiliot could potentially work with other Vision Fund investments such asCoupangorFlipkartfor leaner e-commerce logistics.”</p>\n<p>SoftBank invests in a range of technology companies around the world. Recent deals includeinvestments in the logistics and warehouse robotics sectors. For example, its Vision Fund invested inJD Logistics’ $3.2 billion Hong Kong initial public offerinin May and SoftBank has placed$2.8 billion for a 40% stake in AutoStore, a Norwegian company that specializes in warehouse automation technology for e-commerce.</p>\n<p>Wiliot’s encrypted and cloud-enabled chips connect products that move through global supply chains in crates, packaging and on pallets. The startup has raised a total of $270 million in venture capital over time and the latest round was over subscribed, says Stephen Statler, a senior vice president at Wiliot. “We’ve seen a consistent level of interest between financial and strategic investors in what we do,” he says.</p>\n<p>Attention to autonomous warehouses, robotics and “smart” retail raise interest in object-finder tech, Statler adds. “One of the basics is to have a real-time view of inventory so when (a customer) does show up, you’re not constantly searching for what you want,” he says.</p>\n<p>Wiliot belongs to a small high-tech sub-industry that designs chips for object identification akin to QR coding and RFID (radio-frequency identification) tags, says Morales. The global market for this space spans just 10 startups worth a few tens of millions of dollars, he says.</p>\n<p>Over five years, Morales forecasts the space will grow to around $2 billion, but led by half the number of companies that are active now. “The logistics chip industry could eventually be measured in the trillions of units, as every product or thing can potentially be tagged with a battery-less, wireless tracker for real-time inventory management of the demand chain,” he says.</p>","source":"fors","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>SoftBank Leads $200 Million Investment In Semiconductor Startup, Boosts Logistics Chip Space</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSoftBank Leads $200 Million Investment In Semiconductor Startup, Boosts Logistics Chip Space\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-30 15:26 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.forbes.com/sites/ralphjennings/2021/07/30/softbank-leads-200-million-investment-in-semiconductor-startup-boosts-logistics-chip-space/?sh=388acfd857d9><strong>Forbes</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>A $200 million funding round led by Japanese billionaire Masayoshi Son’s Softbank Group Corp gave a little-known California-based semiconductor startup a boost in the nascent logistics chip space.\n...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.forbes.com/sites/ralphjennings/2021/07/30/softbank-leads-200-million-investment-in-semiconductor-startup-boosts-logistics-chip-space/?sh=388acfd857d9\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SFTBY":"软银集团"},"source_url":"https://www.forbes.com/sites/ralphjennings/2021/07/30/softbank-leads-200-million-investment-in-semiconductor-startup-boosts-logistics-chip-space/?sh=388acfd857d9","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1158887749","content_text":"A $200 million funding round led by Japanese billionaire Masayoshi Son’s Softbank Group Corp gave a little-known California-based semiconductor startup a boost in the nascent logistics chip space.\nSoftBank Group’s Vision Fund 2 led the investment in Wiliot, a four-year-old startup with presence in Australia, Germany, Israel, Taiwan and Ukraine. Previous investors include Amazon.com Web Services and the venture capital arms of Samsung and Japanese mobile carrier NTT Docomo.\nSoftBank’s investment marks a boost for Wiliot, says Mario Morales, group vice president of enabling technologies and semiconductors at market research firm IDC. “Most of these guys have gotten not as much funding as this one,” he notes. “Most of them are running out of money.”\nWiliot, whose stamp-sized chips are designed to allow object identification on a mass scale, could benefit from cross-pollination with the Vision Fund portfolio’s e-commerce and logistics companies, analysts say.\n“Vision Fund is spraying billions of dollars on tech firms, and the flow of cash appears almost limitless,” says Neil Mawston, executive director at Strategy Analytics. “Wiliot could potentially work with other Vision Fund investments such asCoupangorFlipkartfor leaner e-commerce logistics.”\nSoftBank invests in a range of technology companies around the world. Recent deals includeinvestments in the logistics and warehouse robotics sectors. For example, its Vision Fund invested inJD Logistics’ $3.2 billion Hong Kong initial public offerinin May and SoftBank has placed$2.8 billion for a 40% stake in AutoStore, a Norwegian company that specializes in warehouse automation technology for e-commerce.\nWiliot’s encrypted and cloud-enabled chips connect products that move through global supply chains in crates, packaging and on pallets. The startup has raised a total of $270 million in venture capital over time and the latest round was over subscribed, says Stephen Statler, a senior vice president at Wiliot. “We’ve seen a consistent level of interest between financial and strategic investors in what we do,” he says.\nAttention to autonomous warehouses, robotics and “smart” retail raise interest in object-finder tech, Statler adds. “One of the basics is to have a real-time view of inventory so when (a customer) does show up, you’re not constantly searching for what you want,” he says.\nWiliot belongs to a small high-tech sub-industry that designs chips for object identification akin to QR coding and RFID (radio-frequency identification) tags, says Morales. The global market for this space spans just 10 startups worth a few tens of millions of dollars, he says.\nOver five years, Morales forecasts the space will grow to around $2 billion, but led by half the number of companies that are active now. “The logistics chip industry could eventually be measured in the trillions of units, as every product or thing can potentially be tagged with a battery-less, wireless tracker for real-time inventory management of the demand chain,” he says.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":109,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9904884197,"gmtCreate":1660019204622,"gmtModify":1703477048318,"author":{"id":"3574915362300502","authorId":"3574915362300502","name":"Thunderbird","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/86528f4fb847fbbf69680f5b0c603119","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3574915362300502","idStr":"3574915362300502"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"CPI data coming up. Sit right guys.","listText":"CPI data coming up. Sit right guys.","text":"CPI data coming up. Sit right guys.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":8,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9904884197","repostId":"2258244576","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2258244576","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1660003049,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2258244576?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-08-09 07:57","market":"us","language":"en","title":"US STOCKS-Wall Street Closes Little Changed on Fed Policy Fears","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2258244576","media":"Reuters","summary":"* Auto stocks up on Senate approval of bill with EV funding* Nvidia slides as slump in gaming demand","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>* Auto stocks up on Senate approval of bill with EV funding</p><p>* Nvidia slides as slump in gaming demand hits Q2 revenue</p><p>* Dow closes up 0.09%, Nasdaq down 0.1%, S&amp;P 500 0.12%</p><p>Aug 8 (Reuters) - Wall Street closed mostly flat on Monday after blockbuster jobs data last week reinforced expectations the Federal Reserve will crack down on inflation, while a revenue warning from chipmaker Nvidia reminded investors of a slowing U.S. economy.</p><p>Stocks retreated from earlier highs as last week&#39;s blowout labor market report was initially seen as a sign the economy could withstand aggressive interest rate hikes by the Fed to tame inflation running at four-decade highs.</p><p>Investors now await consumer price data on Wednesday to gauge whether the Fed might ease a bit in its inflation fight and provide better footing for the economy to grow.</p><p>&#34;The CPI data will help to confirm if the Fed&#39;s tightening efforts have been successful in starting to tame inflation or if continued Fed tightening is needed,&#34; said Robert Schein, chief investment officer at Blanke Schein Wealth Management.</p><p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average    rose 29.07 points, or 0.09%, to 32,832.54, while the S&amp;P 500    lost 5.13 points, or 0.12%, to 4,140.06 and the Nasdaq Composite    dropped 13.10 points, or 0.1%, to 12,644.46.</p><p>Volume on U.S. exchanges was 11.01 billion shares.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 has bounced back 14% from mid-June lows. But signs of inflation running too hot could cement the Fed&#39;s case for aggressive monetary policy tightening.</p><p>Anthony Saglimbene, chief market strategist at Ameriprise in Troy, Michigan, said the market was due to pull back at some point as traders test the recent rebound.</p><p>&#34;Maybe we can get a little bit higher by year end, but that&#39;s if everything lines up perfectly,&#34; he said, adding that the University of Michigan&#39;s preliminary consumer sentiment survey for August on Friday also will be closely watched.</p><p>&#34;That&#39;s the tug of war between these data sets that tell the story about, &#39;Hey, are we going to turn into a recession or avoid <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a>?&#39;&#34;</p><p>U.S. rate futures have priced in a 67.5% chance of a 75-basis-point hike at the Fed&#39;s next meeting in September, up from about 41% before the labor market data beat market expectations.</p><p>The information technology sector fell 0.9% as chipmaker Nvidia Corp slid 6.3% after the company said it expects second-quarter revenue to decline 19% from the prior quarter to about $6.7 billion, due to weakness in gaming.</p><p>The Philadelphia SE Semiconductor index slid 1.6%, while value stocks rose 0.1% to outpace a 0.4% drop in growth.</p><p>Tesla    rose 0.8% as the U.S. electric-car maker signed contracts worth about $5 billion to buy battery materials from nickel processing companies in Indonesia, according to a CNBC report.</p><p>Shares of U.S. automakers jumped after the U.S. Senate on Sunday passed a $430 billion bill to fight climate change that created a $4,000 tax credit for used electric vehicles and provides billions in funding for their production.</p><p>Rivian Automotive Inc rose 6.78%, Ford Motor Co gained 3.14%, General Motors Co added 4.16% and Lordstown Motors Corp advanced 3.17%.</p><p>Signify Health Inc shot up 11.0% on a media report that CVS Health Corp was looking to buy the health technology company.</p><p>Palantir Technologies Inc dropped 14.2% after the data analytics software company lowered its annual revenue forecast as the timing of some large government contracts remained uncertain.</p><p>Tyson Foods Inc fell 8.4% after missing quarterly profit expectations.</p><p>Advancing issues outnumbered declining ones on the NYSE by a 2.28-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 1.67-to-1 ratio favored advancers.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 posted eight new 52-week highs and 29 new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 104 new highs and 27 new lows.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>US STOCKS-Wall Street Closes Little Changed on Fed Policy Fears</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nUS STOCKS-Wall Street Closes Little Changed on Fed Policy Fears\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-08-09 07:57</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>* Auto stocks up on Senate approval of bill with EV funding</p><p>* Nvidia slides as slump in gaming demand hits Q2 revenue</p><p>* Dow closes up 0.09%, Nasdaq down 0.1%, S&amp;P 500 0.12%</p><p>Aug 8 (Reuters) - Wall Street closed mostly flat on Monday after blockbuster jobs data last week reinforced expectations the Federal Reserve will crack down on inflation, while a revenue warning from chipmaker Nvidia reminded investors of a slowing U.S. economy.</p><p>Stocks retreated from earlier highs as last week&#39;s blowout labor market report was initially seen as a sign the economy could withstand aggressive interest rate hikes by the Fed to tame inflation running at four-decade highs.</p><p>Investors now await consumer price data on Wednesday to gauge whether the Fed might ease a bit in its inflation fight and provide better footing for the economy to grow.</p><p>&#34;The CPI data will help to confirm if the Fed&#39;s tightening efforts have been successful in starting to tame inflation or if continued Fed tightening is needed,&#34; said Robert Schein, chief investment officer at Blanke Schein Wealth Management.</p><p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average    rose 29.07 points, or 0.09%, to 32,832.54, while the S&amp;P 500    lost 5.13 points, or 0.12%, to 4,140.06 and the Nasdaq Composite    dropped 13.10 points, or 0.1%, to 12,644.46.</p><p>Volume on U.S. exchanges was 11.01 billion shares.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 has bounced back 14% from mid-June lows. But signs of inflation running too hot could cement the Fed&#39;s case for aggressive monetary policy tightening.</p><p>Anthony Saglimbene, chief market strategist at Ameriprise in Troy, Michigan, said the market was due to pull back at some point as traders test the recent rebound.</p><p>&#34;Maybe we can get a little bit higher by year end, but that&#39;s if everything lines up perfectly,&#34; he said, adding that the University of Michigan&#39;s preliminary consumer sentiment survey for August on Friday also will be closely watched.</p><p>&#34;That&#39;s the tug of war between these data sets that tell the story about, &#39;Hey, are we going to turn into a recession or avoid <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a>?&#39;&#34;</p><p>U.S. rate futures have priced in a 67.5% chance of a 75-basis-point hike at the Fed&#39;s next meeting in September, up from about 41% before the labor market data beat market expectations.</p><p>The information technology sector fell 0.9% as chipmaker Nvidia Corp slid 6.3% after the company said it expects second-quarter revenue to decline 19% from the prior quarter to about $6.7 billion, due to weakness in gaming.</p><p>The Philadelphia SE Semiconductor index slid 1.6%, while value stocks rose 0.1% to outpace a 0.4% drop in growth.</p><p>Tesla    rose 0.8% as the U.S. electric-car maker signed contracts worth about $5 billion to buy battery materials from nickel processing companies in Indonesia, according to a CNBC report.</p><p>Shares of U.S. automakers jumped after the U.S. Senate on Sunday passed a $430 billion bill to fight climate change that created a $4,000 tax credit for used electric vehicles and provides billions in funding for their production.</p><p>Rivian Automotive Inc rose 6.78%, Ford Motor Co gained 3.14%, General Motors Co added 4.16% and Lordstown Motors Corp advanced 3.17%.</p><p>Signify Health Inc shot up 11.0% on a media report that CVS Health Corp was looking to buy the health technology company.</p><p>Palantir Technologies Inc dropped 14.2% after the data analytics software company lowered its annual revenue forecast as the timing of some large government contracts remained uncertain.</p><p>Tyson Foods Inc fell 8.4% after missing quarterly profit expectations.</p><p>Advancing issues outnumbered declining ones on the NYSE by a 2.28-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 1.67-to-1 ratio favored advancers.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 posted eight new 52-week highs and 29 new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 104 new highs and 27 new lows.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BK4503":"景林资产持仓","BK4549":"软银资本持仓","BK4554":"元宇宙及AR概念","BK4532":"文艺复兴科技持仓","BK4567":"ESG概念","CGEM":"Cullinan Therapeutics","BK4529":"IDC概念","BK4543":"AI","BK4579":"人工智能","BK4141":"半导体产品","NVDA":"英伟达"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2258244576","content_text":"* Auto stocks up on Senate approval of bill with EV funding* Nvidia slides as slump in gaming demand hits Q2 revenue* Dow closes up 0.09%, Nasdaq down 0.1%, S&P 500 0.12%Aug 8 (Reuters) - Wall Street closed mostly flat on Monday after blockbuster jobs data last week reinforced expectations the Federal Reserve will crack down on inflation, while a revenue warning from chipmaker Nvidia reminded investors of a slowing U.S. economy.Stocks retreated from earlier highs as last week's blowout labor market report was initially seen as a sign the economy could withstand aggressive interest rate hikes by the Fed to tame inflation running at four-decade highs.Investors now await consumer price data on Wednesday to gauge whether the Fed might ease a bit in its inflation fight and provide better footing for the economy to grow.\"The CPI data will help to confirm if the Fed's tightening efforts have been successful in starting to tame inflation or if continued Fed tightening is needed,\" said Robert Schein, chief investment officer at Blanke Schein Wealth Management.The Dow Jones Industrial Average    rose 29.07 points, or 0.09%, to 32,832.54, while the S&P 500    lost 5.13 points, or 0.12%, to 4,140.06 and the Nasdaq Composite    dropped 13.10 points, or 0.1%, to 12,644.46.Volume on U.S. exchanges was 11.01 billion shares.The S&P 500 has bounced back 14% from mid-June lows. But signs of inflation running too hot could cement the Fed's case for aggressive monetary policy tightening.Anthony Saglimbene, chief market strategist at Ameriprise in Troy, Michigan, said the market was due to pull back at some point as traders test the recent rebound.\"Maybe we can get a little bit higher by year end, but that's if everything lines up perfectly,\" he said, adding that the University of Michigan's preliminary consumer sentiment survey for August on Friday also will be closely watched.\"That's the tug of war between these data sets that tell the story about, 'Hey, are we going to turn into a recession or avoid one?'\"U.S. rate futures have priced in a 67.5% chance of a 75-basis-point hike at the Fed's next meeting in September, up from about 41% before the labor market data beat market expectations.The information technology sector fell 0.9% as chipmaker Nvidia Corp slid 6.3% after the company said it expects second-quarter revenue to decline 19% from the prior quarter to about $6.7 billion, due to weakness in gaming.The Philadelphia SE Semiconductor index slid 1.6%, while value stocks rose 0.1% to outpace a 0.4% drop in growth.Tesla    rose 0.8% as the U.S. electric-car maker signed contracts worth about $5 billion to buy battery materials from nickel processing companies in Indonesia, according to a CNBC report.Shares of U.S. automakers jumped after the U.S. Senate on Sunday passed a $430 billion bill to fight climate change that created a $4,000 tax credit for used electric vehicles and provides billions in funding for their production.Rivian Automotive Inc rose 6.78%, Ford Motor Co gained 3.14%, General Motors Co added 4.16% and Lordstown Motors Corp advanced 3.17%.Signify Health Inc shot up 11.0% on a media report that CVS Health Corp was looking to buy the health technology company.Palantir Technologies Inc dropped 14.2% after the data analytics software company lowered its annual revenue forecast as the timing of some large government contracts remained uncertain.Tyson Foods Inc fell 8.4% after missing quarterly profit expectations.Advancing issues outnumbered declining ones on the NYSE by a 2.28-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 1.67-to-1 ratio favored advancers.The S&P 500 posted eight new 52-week highs and 29 new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 104 new highs and 27 new lows.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":40,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9993367520,"gmtCreate":1660628589564,"gmtModify":1676536368886,"author":{"id":"3574915362300502","authorId":"3574915362300502","name":"Thunderbird","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/86528f4fb847fbbf69680f5b0c603119","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3574915362300502","idStr":"3574915362300502"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Please like :)","listText":"Please like :)","text":"Please like :)","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9993367520","repostId":"1186715007","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1186715007","pubTimestamp":1660627290,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1186715007?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-08-16 13:21","market":"us","language":"en","title":"What Are Single Stock & Bond ETFs? Should You Consider Buying Them","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1186715007","media":"The Street","summary":"While ETFs are known as a great way to get broad diversification in your portfolio at rock bottom prices, the latest industry trend goes decidedly in the opposite direction.ETFs targeting just a single stock have become all the rage lately. As I write this, 20 such ETFs have been launched in just the past two months with the potential for hundreds more coming down the line.The obvious question may be “why would somebody invest in a single stock ETF when they can just buy the stock?”","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>While ETFs are known as a great way to get broad diversification in your portfolio at rock bottom prices, the latest industry trend goes decidedly in the opposite direction.</p><p>ETFs targeting just a single stock have become all the rage lately. As I write this, 20 such ETFs have been launched in just the past two months with the potential for hundreds more coming down the line.</p><p>The obvious question may be “why would somebody invest in a single stock ETF when they can just buy the stock?” The answer is that they layer something on top of the single stock exposure. Some use an inverse strategy and the short the underlying stock. Others provide leveraged exposure. At least one uses a “hedged” strategy that adds options to limit the potential range of returns, much like the buffer ETFs that are already out there.</p><p>The SEC has gone on record with their concerns about the potential risks of single stock ETFs. In my opinion, it’s tough to argue why the SEC should reject them when it’s already approved a slew of triple-leveraged oil ETFs and other products. They have, however, limited the leverage that is being used in these ETFs. You won’t find any triple-leveraged funds here. The most we’ve seen so far is 2x exposure on Pfizer and Nike, but we’ll see if that changes down the road.</p><p>For the record, I don’t think there’s a market for these outside of short-term traders. Longer-term investors probably don’t need them since the expense ratios and the cost of leverage and need to roll over derivatives exposure on a daily basis could negate a lot of the upside of the leverage in the first place. But there are always folks who want to add a little juice to a short-term trade and these could be ideal for that purpose.</p><p>Let’s break down where we stand today with the list of available single stock ETFs.</p><p>Leveraged Single Stock ETFs</p><ul><li><b>AXS 1.5X PYPL Bull Daily ETF (PYPT)</b></li><li><b>AXS 2X NKE Bull Daily ETF (NKEL)</b></li><li><b>AXS 2X PFE Bull Daily ETF (PFEL)</b></li><li><b>GraniteShares 1.25X Long Tesla Daily ETF (TSL)</b></li><li><b>GraniteShares 1.5X Long Coinbase Daily ETF (CONL)</b></li><li><b>GraniteShares 1.75X Long AAPL Daily ETF (AAPB)</b></li><li><b>Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 1.5X Shares ETF (TSLL)</b></li><li><b>Direxion Daily AAPL Bull 1.5X Shares ETF (AAPU)</b></li></ul><p>So far, interest in these ETFs has been minor at best. TSLL is the largest of the group, but it’s gained only $7 million in assets. Most are still just starting off with $1-2 million. Even the 1.5X Coinbase ETF hasn’t really gotten any traction, which I find a little surprising. The stock itself has had a rough go of it lately, so I imagine that could perhaps make investors a little gun-shy. It’s still very early on and some of these ETFs are only a week old. It’s too early to draw any conclusions and these may take off yet.</p><p>You can see the relative comfort level of the SEC in approving these ETFs based on the amount of leverage allowed. Nike and Pfizer are more established blue chip names and, therefore, got a higher degree of leverage for NKEL and PFEL. Apple and PayPal being slightly more volatile tech names got a little less. I’m a little surprised that CONL and TSSL got approved for 1.5X exposure given how volatile they are. The expense ratios on the Direxion and GraniteShares ETFs are 0.97% and 1.15%, respectively, so these products are not necessarily cheap to own and hold.</p><p>Inverse Single Stock ETFs</p><ul><li><b>AXS 1.5X PYPL Bear Daily ETF (PYPS)</b></li><li><b>AXS 2X NKE Bear Daily ETF (NKEQ)</b></li><li><b>AXS 2X PFE Bear Daily ETF (PFES)</b></li><li><b>AXS TSLA Bear Daily ETF (TSLQ)</b></li><li><b>AXS 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF (NVDS)</b></li><li><b>GraniteShares 1X Short Tesla Daily ETF (TSLI)</b></li><li><b>Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X Shares ETF (TSLS)</b></li><li><b>Direxion Daily AAPL Bear 1X Shares ETF (AAPD)</b></li></ul><p>Most of the long ETFs listed above have short counterparts. AXS opted for short-only versions of their Tesla and NVIDIA ETFs. TSLQ, TSLI and TSLS are essentially identical in their exposures. NVDS has just a little bit of short leverage to provide some extra downside. The AXS funds are really the only ones that offer more meaningful leverage on the inverse side.</p><p>Hedged Single Stock ETFs</p><ul><li><b>Innovator Hedged TSLA Strategy ETF (TSLH)</b></li></ul><p>As mentioned earlier, TSLH is the more unique ETF of the group in that it combines an options strategy on top of Tesla to put a cap on gains and a floor on returns. On a quarterly basis, the cap on positive returns is 9.29% with the floor on losses set at 10%. Tesla can obviously have swings like that on a daily basis, but for people who want to take a swing at owning Tesla but also protect themselves from severe losses, this could be an option.</p><p>The buffer ETFs (also offered by Innovator among others) have built up more than $16 billion in assets, so there’s definitely a market for these products. We’ll see if the buffer ETF concept for indexes translates over to a similar strategy for single stocks, but there’s reason to think it might.</p><p>Single Bond ETFs</p><ul><li><b>U.S. Treasury 3 Month Bill ETF (TBIL)</b></li><li><b>U.S. Treasury 2 Year Note ETF (UTWO)</b></li><li><b>U.S. Treasury 10 Year Note ETF (UTEN)</b></li></ul><p>These ETFs I find really interesting. Whereas a lot of fixed income funds hold potentially thousands of different bonds, these hold one single bond - the latest issue of U.S. government bonds at these maturities. It’s as close as you’ll get to owning the actual bond without actually owning it.</p><p>The benefit of these, using UTEN as an example, is that they will own the most recent 10-year note, but then roll it over into the newest 10-year note when it’s issued. You’re essentially getting consistent 10-year note exposure. If you buy an individual government bond, the remaining maturity changes over time as does its interest rate risk. These ETFs will maintain ongoing exposure to the newest issued bonds and shareholders won’t have to do a thing.</p><p>Each comes with an expense ratio of 0.15%, so they’re relatively cheap to own as well. Investors have already responded positively with TBIL and UTEN already having more than $20 million in assets each.</p><p>Conclusion</p><p>I can see two things happening with single stock ETFs - 1) dozens, if not hundreds, of these ETFs could eventually be launched and 2) most of them will gain almost no interest. The only ones that are likely going to be winners in terms of assets are going to be the ones based on “buzzy” stocks, such as Tesla or Netflix or Twitter or some of the FAAMG names. Anything else is probably going to be DOA. Is anybody really looking for leveraged exposure on Pfizer in an ETF?</p><p>I see single stock ETFs going in four directions - leveraged, inverse, buffer and covered calls. The first three have been launched already. The fourth one has yet to debut, but I think it’s coming. An ETF that owns Microsoft, for example, and writes calls based on Microsoft stock I think could be an interesting strategy. High yield investors could be intrigued with capturing a 5%+ yield with equity exposure much like they have with other covered call ETFs.</p><p>In short, I think these are certainly unique and probably fill a gap or some investors, but not many. These will be for traders, but longer-term investors probably won’t have much use for them. I think a lot of these could eventually be closed due to lack of interest. It’s only been two months and we’ve already got 6 ETFs based on Tesla. Not all of them are going to survive and this space could get watered down quickly.</p></body></html>","source":"lsy1610613172068","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>What Are Single Stock & Bond ETFs? Should You Consider Buying Them</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhat Are Single Stock & Bond ETFs? Should You Consider Buying Them\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-08-16 13:21 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.thestreet.com/etffocus/trade-ideas/investing-strategy-single-stock-bond-etfs-what-are-they-should-you-consider-buying-them><strong>The Street</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>While ETFs are known as a great way to get broad diversification in your portfolio at rock bottom prices, the latest industry trend goes decidedly in the opposite direction.ETFs targeting just a ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.thestreet.com/etffocus/trade-ideas/investing-strategy-single-stock-bond-etfs-what-are-they-should-you-consider-buying-them\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"PYPT":"PayPal 1.5倍做多ETF-AXS","AAPD":"Direxion Daily AAPL Bear 1X Shares","TSLQ":"Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF"},"source_url":"https://www.thestreet.com/etffocus/trade-ideas/investing-strategy-single-stock-bond-etfs-what-are-they-should-you-consider-buying-them","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1186715007","content_text":"While ETFs are known as a great way to get broad diversification in your portfolio at rock bottom prices, the latest industry trend goes decidedly in the opposite direction.ETFs targeting just a single stock have become all the rage lately. As I write this, 20 such ETFs have been launched in just the past two months with the potential for hundreds more coming down the line.The obvious question may be “why would somebody invest in a single stock ETF when they can just buy the stock?” The answer is that they layer something on top of the single stock exposure. Some use an inverse strategy and the short the underlying stock. Others provide leveraged exposure. At least one uses a “hedged” strategy that adds options to limit the potential range of returns, much like the buffer ETFs that are already out there.The SEC has gone on record with their concerns about the potential risks of single stock ETFs. In my opinion, it’s tough to argue why the SEC should reject them when it’s already approved a slew of triple-leveraged oil ETFs and other products. They have, however, limited the leverage that is being used in these ETFs. You won’t find any triple-leveraged funds here. The most we’ve seen so far is 2x exposure on Pfizer and Nike, but we’ll see if that changes down the road.For the record, I don’t think there’s a market for these outside of short-term traders. Longer-term investors probably don’t need them since the expense ratios and the cost of leverage and need to roll over derivatives exposure on a daily basis could negate a lot of the upside of the leverage in the first place. But there are always folks who want to add a little juice to a short-term trade and these could be ideal for that purpose.Let’s break down where we stand today with the list of available single stock ETFs.Leveraged Single Stock ETFsAXS 1.5X PYPL Bull Daily ETF (PYPT)AXS 2X NKE Bull Daily ETF (NKEL)AXS 2X PFE Bull Daily ETF (PFEL)GraniteShares 1.25X Long Tesla Daily ETF (TSL)GraniteShares 1.5X Long Coinbase Daily ETF (CONL)GraniteShares 1.75X Long AAPL Daily ETF (AAPB)Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 1.5X Shares ETF (TSLL)Direxion Daily AAPL Bull 1.5X Shares ETF (AAPU)So far, interest in these ETFs has been minor at best. TSLL is the largest of the group, but it’s gained only $7 million in assets. Most are still just starting off with $1-2 million. Even the 1.5X Coinbase ETF hasn’t really gotten any traction, which I find a little surprising. The stock itself has had a rough go of it lately, so I imagine that could perhaps make investors a little gun-shy. It’s still very early on and some of these ETFs are only a week old. It’s too early to draw any conclusions and these may take off yet.You can see the relative comfort level of the SEC in approving these ETFs based on the amount of leverage allowed. Nike and Pfizer are more established blue chip names and, therefore, got a higher degree of leverage for NKEL and PFEL. Apple and PayPal being slightly more volatile tech names got a little less. I’m a little surprised that CONL and TSSL got approved for 1.5X exposure given how volatile they are. The expense ratios on the Direxion and GraniteShares ETFs are 0.97% and 1.15%, respectively, so these products are not necessarily cheap to own and hold.Inverse Single Stock ETFsAXS 1.5X PYPL Bear Daily ETF (PYPS)AXS 2X NKE Bear Daily ETF (NKEQ)AXS 2X PFE Bear Daily ETF (PFES)AXS TSLA Bear Daily ETF (TSLQ)AXS 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF (NVDS)GraniteShares 1X Short Tesla Daily ETF (TSLI)Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X Shares ETF (TSLS)Direxion Daily AAPL Bear 1X Shares ETF (AAPD)Most of the long ETFs listed above have short counterparts. AXS opted for short-only versions of their Tesla and NVIDIA ETFs. TSLQ, TSLI and TSLS are essentially identical in their exposures. NVDS has just a little bit of short leverage to provide some extra downside. The AXS funds are really the only ones that offer more meaningful leverage on the inverse side.Hedged Single Stock ETFsInnovator Hedged TSLA Strategy ETF (TSLH)As mentioned earlier, TSLH is the more unique ETF of the group in that it combines an options strategy on top of Tesla to put a cap on gains and a floor on returns. On a quarterly basis, the cap on positive returns is 9.29% with the floor on losses set at 10%. Tesla can obviously have swings like that on a daily basis, but for people who want to take a swing at owning Tesla but also protect themselves from severe losses, this could be an option.The buffer ETFs (also offered by Innovator among others) have built up more than $16 billion in assets, so there’s definitely a market for these products. We’ll see if the buffer ETF concept for indexes translates over to a similar strategy for single stocks, but there’s reason to think it might.Single Bond ETFsU.S. Treasury 3 Month Bill ETF (TBIL)U.S. Treasury 2 Year Note ETF (UTWO)U.S. Treasury 10 Year Note ETF (UTEN)These ETFs I find really interesting. Whereas a lot of fixed income funds hold potentially thousands of different bonds, these hold one single bond - the latest issue of U.S. government bonds at these maturities. It’s as close as you’ll get to owning the actual bond without actually owning it.The benefit of these, using UTEN as an example, is that they will own the most recent 10-year note, but then roll it over into the newest 10-year note when it’s issued. You’re essentially getting consistent 10-year note exposure. If you buy an individual government bond, the remaining maturity changes over time as does its interest rate risk. These ETFs will maintain ongoing exposure to the newest issued bonds and shareholders won’t have to do a thing.Each comes with an expense ratio of 0.15%, so they’re relatively cheap to own as well. Investors have already responded positively with TBIL and UTEN already having more than $20 million in assets each.ConclusionI can see two things happening with single stock ETFs - 1) dozens, if not hundreds, of these ETFs could eventually be launched and 2) most of them will gain almost no interest. The only ones that are likely going to be winners in terms of assets are going to be the ones based on “buzzy” stocks, such as Tesla or Netflix or Twitter or some of the FAAMG names. Anything else is probably going to be DOA. Is anybody really looking for leveraged exposure on Pfizer in an ETF?I see single stock ETFs going in four directions - leveraged, inverse, buffer and covered calls. The first three have been launched already. The fourth one has yet to debut, but I think it’s coming. An ETF that owns Microsoft, for example, and writes calls based on Microsoft stock I think could be an interesting strategy. High yield investors could be intrigued with capturing a 5%+ yield with equity exposure much like they have with other covered call ETFs.In short, I think these are certainly unique and probably fill a gap or some investors, but not many. These will be for traders, but longer-term investors probably won’t have much use for them. I think a lot of these could eventually be closed due to lack of interest. It’s only been two months and we’ve already got 6 ETFs based on Tesla. Not all of them are going to survive and this space could get watered down quickly.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":171,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":899868350,"gmtCreate":1628174079270,"gmtModify":1703502607975,"author":{"id":"3574915362300502","authorId":"3574915362300502","name":"Thunderbird","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/86528f4fb847fbbf69680f5b0c603119","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3574915362300502","idStr":"3574915362300502"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Agrees","listText":"Agrees","text":"Agrees","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/899868350","repostId":"1197602353","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":193,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9901797915,"gmtCreate":1659263423137,"gmtModify":1676536278793,"author":{"id":"3574915362300502","authorId":"3574915362300502","name":"Thunderbird","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/86528f4fb847fbbf69680f5b0c603119","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3574915362300502","idStr":"3574915362300502"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"One bad news after another.... is the market sinking?","listText":"One bad news after another.... is the market sinking?","text":"One bad news after another.... is the market sinking?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9901797915","repostId":"1165172007","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1165172007","pubTimestamp":1659229304,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1165172007?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-07-31 09:01","market":"hk","language":"en","title":"Alibaba: The Delisting Fears Are Back - Time To Turn Bullish Again?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1165172007","media":"seekingalpha","summary":"SummaryAlibaba was struck by delisting fears again on July 29, as the US SEC added China's leading e","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>Summary</b></p><ul><li>Alibaba was struck by delisting fears again on July 29, as the US SEC added China&#39;s leading e-commerce player to its delisting list. As a result, BABA slumped.</li><li>However, we urge investors not to overreact to such fears. Alibaba is seeking a primary listing in Hong Kong that would enable it to access capital and liquidity from Chinese investors.</li><li>We also believe the recent statement by Politburo, which suggested that China could miss its 5.5% GDP growth target, could have unsettled some investors.</li><li>Notwithstanding, we believe it sets up BABA very well, heading into its upcoming Q1 card on August 4.</li><li>Therefore, we revise our rating from Hold to Buy. We urge investors to use the recent pessimism and add exposure, as its price action is leaning increasingly bullish.</li></ul><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/349a5bf19a4fd08047fdb45cb2ec1bb8\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"720\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Robert Way</span></p><p><b>Thesis</b></p><p>Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE:BABA) is slated to report its FQ1&#39;23 earnings release on August 4. BABA investors have been hammered (again) over the past month as the bears returned to haunt Chinese stocks. The delisting fears are back!</p><p>In our June downgrade (Hold rating), we cautioned investors that we noted significant selling pressure at its critical resistance zone ($125) and urged them to avoid adding at those levels. Despite the sharp recovery from its May lows, we were concerned that the market could use the bullish sentiments in June to attract buyers into a trap before digesting those gains.</p><p>Consequently, since our June article, BABA has significantly underperformed the SPDR S&amp;P 500 ETF (SPY). As a result, it posted a return of -14.5%, against the SPY&#39;s 11.06% gain over the same period.</p><p>The market has leveraged the recent pessimism astutely over its delisting risks and China&#39;s increasingly tenuous GDP growth target to shake out weak hands. As a result, the market pessimism has presented investors with another opportunity to consider adding BABA again!</p><p>Therefore, we revise our rating on BABA from Hold to Buy. Notwithstanding, we caution investors that our price action analysis has yet to indicate any potential bear trap (indicating that the market decisively denied further selling downside) yet. Therefore, we are &#34;front-running&#34; the market in anticipation of robust buying support at the current levels to appear soon.</p><p><b>Delisting And GDP Growth Target Fears!</b></p><p>BABA slumped on July 29 as the US SEC added China&#39;s e-commerce behemoth to its delisting list, which stunned the market.</p><p>However, are such headwinds new? Absolutely not. So, we urge investors not to overreact to such a move by the market to shake out weak hands. BABA got a boost recently as the company highlighted that it could seek a primary listing in Hong Kong, quelling fears of its delisting in the US. Furthermore, a primary listing in Hong Kong would enable Alibaba to leverage investors in mainland China to invest in its stock.</p><p>Citi&#39;s (C) recent commentary was favorable of the move by Alibaba to seek a primary listing in Hong Kong. It emphasized (edited):</p><blockquote>We view the move as positive given the continued overhang on ADRs from the threat of delisting. A smooth transition to the new primary listing could pave the wave for other companies that already have dual listings. We view this as an important sentiment shift to attract more capital and liquidity to Alibaba and other China Internet stocks over time. - Barron&#39;s</blockquote><p>Notwithstanding, KGI Asia (a leading Hong Kong brokerage firm) noted that the process could be more complex than what investors assessed. Accordingly, it accentuated (edited):</p><blockquote>On top of earnings concerns, there are some worries that the listing timetable for Ant might be delayed by Jack Ma&#39;s decision to give up his control over Ant Group. It&#39;s hard for A-share companies to obtain approval if there is a change in key shareholding structure within three years. - Bloomberg</blockquote><p>Furthermore, the market could also have been spooked by the language used by the Chinese government after its recent Politburo (China&#39;s highest decision-making body) meeting.</p><p>The language in its statement suggested that China seems to be moving away from trying to maintain its 5.5% GDP growth target, which economists have emphasized for months is improbable. Bloomberg reported (edited):</p><blockquote>China&#39;s top leadership gave a downbeat assessment of economic growth but didn&#39;t announce new stimulus policies at a key meeting. It stated the country should achieve &#34;the best outcome&#34; possible for economic growth this year while sticking to a strict Covid Zero policy. There was no mention of the national economic goals as there was at the April meeting, suggesting the government is downplaying the target of &#34;around 5.5%&#34; growth for this year that most economists think is impossible after a slump last quarter. - Bloomberg</blockquote><p><b>Investors Could Be Concerned With A Downbeat Q1 Earnings</b></p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0d6acf7fa059008eb6e2bf0f3eef947d\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"396\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Alibaba revenue change % and adjusted EPS change % consensus estimates (S&amp;P Cap IQ)</span></p><p>As a result, we believe the market is attempting to de-risk its valuation of BABA, heading into its Q1 earnings.</p><p>The revised consensus estimates (very bullish) suggest that Alibaba could post revenue growth of -0.9% YoY in FQ1, following Q4&#39;s 8.9% increase. However, its profitability could continue to see further headwinds, as its adjusted EPS is projected to fall by 36.7% YoY.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/944e41609958c9613f4c0ec4325bb22a\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"396\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Alibaba adjusted EBITA by segment (Company filings)</span></p><p>However, we believe investors should not be stunned. There shouldn&#39;t be any surprises, right? Despite the growth momentum seen in Ali Cloud, commerce (physical and e-commerce) remains Alibaba&#39;s most critical adjusted EBITA driver, as seen above.</p><p>Therefore, the current macro headwinds that have continued to impact China&#39;s consumer discretionary spending, coupled with the COVID lockdowns, would likely be persistent.</p><p>Furthermore, the ongoing property market malaise has seen little signs of turning for the better, as homebuyers have gone on strike over making further mortgage payments on unfinished homes.</p><p><b>Is BABA Stock A Buy, Sell, Or Hold?</b></p><p><i>We revise our rating on BABA from Hold to Buy.</i></p><p>We believe the recent pessimistic sentiments on BABA sets up the stock very nicely, heading into its Q1 card. In addition, positive commentary from management about its expected recovery from 2023 should help stabilize the stock. With a net cash position of $43.92B, Alibaba is in an enviable position to continue making strategic stock repurchases to underpin its recovery momentum moving forward.</p><p>While we do not expect BABA to break below its March lows of $73, we have yet to observe constructive price structures that suggest its selling downside is facing significant buying pressure. Therefore, our Buy rating attempts to front-run the market, and investors should be ready for potential downside volatility.</p><p><i>This article was written by JR Research</i></p></body></html>","source":"seekingalpha","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Alibaba: The Delisting Fears Are Back - Time To Turn Bullish Again?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAlibaba: The Delisting Fears Are Back - Time To Turn Bullish Again?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-07-31 09:01 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4527781-alibaba-delisting-fears-back-time-to-turn-bullish?source=content_type%3Areact%7Cfirst_level_url%3Ahome%7Csection%3Atrending_articles%7Cline%3A6><strong>seekingalpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>SummaryAlibaba was struck by delisting fears again on July 29, as the US SEC added China's leading e-commerce player to its delisting list. As a result, BABA slumped.However, we urge investors not to ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4527781-alibaba-delisting-fears-back-time-to-turn-bullish?source=content_type%3Areact%7Cfirst_level_url%3Ahome%7Csection%3Atrending_articles%7Cline%3A6\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BABA":"阿里巴巴","09988":"阿里巴巴-W"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4527781-alibaba-delisting-fears-back-time-to-turn-bullish?source=content_type%3Areact%7Cfirst_level_url%3Ahome%7Csection%3Atrending_articles%7Cline%3A6","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5a36db9d73b4222bc376d24ccc48c8a4","article_id":"1165172007","content_text":"SummaryAlibaba was struck by delisting fears again on July 29, as the US SEC added China's leading e-commerce player to its delisting list. As a result, BABA slumped.However, we urge investors not to overreact to such fears. Alibaba is seeking a primary listing in Hong Kong that would enable it to access capital and liquidity from Chinese investors.We also believe the recent statement by Politburo, which suggested that China could miss its 5.5% GDP growth target, could have unsettled some investors.Notwithstanding, we believe it sets up BABA very well, heading into its upcoming Q1 card on August 4.Therefore, we revise our rating from Hold to Buy. We urge investors to use the recent pessimism and add exposure, as its price action is leaning increasingly bullish.Robert WayThesisAlibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE:BABA) is slated to report its FQ1'23 earnings release on August 4. BABA investors have been hammered (again) over the past month as the bears returned to haunt Chinese stocks. The delisting fears are back!In our June downgrade (Hold rating), we cautioned investors that we noted significant selling pressure at its critical resistance zone ($125) and urged them to avoid adding at those levels. Despite the sharp recovery from its May lows, we were concerned that the market could use the bullish sentiments in June to attract buyers into a trap before digesting those gains.Consequently, since our June article, BABA has significantly underperformed the SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). As a result, it posted a return of -14.5%, against the SPY's 11.06% gain over the same period.The market has leveraged the recent pessimism astutely over its delisting risks and China's increasingly tenuous GDP growth target to shake out weak hands. As a result, the market pessimism has presented investors with another opportunity to consider adding BABA again!Therefore, we revise our rating on BABA from Hold to Buy. Notwithstanding, we caution investors that our price action analysis has yet to indicate any potential bear trap (indicating that the market decisively denied further selling downside) yet. Therefore, we are \"front-running\" the market in anticipation of robust buying support at the current levels to appear soon.Delisting And GDP Growth Target Fears!BABA slumped on July 29 as the US SEC added China's e-commerce behemoth to its delisting list, which stunned the market.However, are such headwinds new? Absolutely not. So, we urge investors not to overreact to such a move by the market to shake out weak hands. BABA got a boost recently as the company highlighted that it could seek a primary listing in Hong Kong, quelling fears of its delisting in the US. Furthermore, a primary listing in Hong Kong would enable Alibaba to leverage investors in mainland China to invest in its stock.Citi's (C) recent commentary was favorable of the move by Alibaba to seek a primary listing in Hong Kong. It emphasized (edited):We view the move as positive given the continued overhang on ADRs from the threat of delisting. A smooth transition to the new primary listing could pave the wave for other companies that already have dual listings. We view this as an important sentiment shift to attract more capital and liquidity to Alibaba and other China Internet stocks over time. - Barron'sNotwithstanding, KGI Asia (a leading Hong Kong brokerage firm) noted that the process could be more complex than what investors assessed. Accordingly, it accentuated (edited):On top of earnings concerns, there are some worries that the listing timetable for Ant might be delayed by Jack Ma's decision to give up his control over Ant Group. It's hard for A-share companies to obtain approval if there is a change in key shareholding structure within three years. - BloombergFurthermore, the market could also have been spooked by the language used by the Chinese government after its recent Politburo (China's highest decision-making body) meeting.The language in its statement suggested that China seems to be moving away from trying to maintain its 5.5% GDP growth target, which economists have emphasized for months is improbable. Bloomberg reported (edited):China's top leadership gave a downbeat assessment of economic growth but didn't announce new stimulus policies at a key meeting. It stated the country should achieve \"the best outcome\" possible for economic growth this year while sticking to a strict Covid Zero policy. There was no mention of the national economic goals as there was at the April meeting, suggesting the government is downplaying the target of \"around 5.5%\" growth for this year that most economists think is impossible after a slump last quarter. - BloombergInvestors Could Be Concerned With A Downbeat Q1 EarningsAlibaba revenue change % and adjusted EPS change % consensus estimates (S&P Cap IQ)As a result, we believe the market is attempting to de-risk its valuation of BABA, heading into its Q1 earnings.The revised consensus estimates (very bullish) suggest that Alibaba could post revenue growth of -0.9% YoY in FQ1, following Q4's 8.9% increase. However, its profitability could continue to see further headwinds, as its adjusted EPS is projected to fall by 36.7% YoY.Alibaba adjusted EBITA by segment (Company filings)However, we believe investors should not be stunned. There shouldn't be any surprises, right? Despite the growth momentum seen in Ali Cloud, commerce (physical and e-commerce) remains Alibaba's most critical adjusted EBITA driver, as seen above.Therefore, the current macro headwinds that have continued to impact China's consumer discretionary spending, coupled with the COVID lockdowns, would likely be persistent.Furthermore, the ongoing property market malaise has seen little signs of turning for the better, as homebuyers have gone on strike over making further mortgage payments on unfinished homes.Is BABA Stock A Buy, Sell, Or Hold?We revise our rating on BABA from Hold to Buy.We believe the recent pessimistic sentiments on BABA sets up the stock very nicely, heading into its Q1 card. In addition, positive commentary from management about its expected recovery from 2023 should help stabilize the stock. With a net cash position of $43.92B, Alibaba is in an enviable position to continue making strategic stock repurchases to underpin its recovery momentum moving forward.While we do not expect BABA to break below its March lows of $73, we have yet to observe constructive price structures that suggest its selling downside is facing significant buying pressure. Therefore, our Buy rating attempts to front-run the market, and investors should be ready for potential downside volatility.This article was written by JR Research","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":30,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":175742836,"gmtCreate":1627050595025,"gmtModify":1703483387424,"author":{"id":"3574915362300502","authorId":"3574915362300502","name":"Thunderbird","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/86528f4fb847fbbf69680f5b0c603119","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3574915362300502","idStr":"3574915362300502"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"If market crash, all will crash.","listText":"If market crash, all will crash.","text":"If market crash, all will crash.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/175742836","repostId":"2153983997","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2153983997","pubTimestamp":1627045860,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2153983997?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-23 21:11","market":"us","language":"en","title":"3 Stocks to Buy Whether or Not a Market Crash Is Near","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2153983997","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Maybe the market is about to crash, and maybe it isn't. These stocks look like good picks either way.","content":"<p>Rising COVID-19 cases. Concerns about the highly contagious delta variant. The possibility of another housing bubble bursting. These are some of the reasons why worries are increasing among investors that a stock market crash could be on the way.</p>\n<p>One of the biggest stock market bears, Harry Dent Jr., who predicted the dot.com bubble collapsing, even thinks that a market meltdown is likely within the next three months. Is all of the pessimism warranted? Maybe, maybe not.</p>\n<p>If you're leery about what's around the corner, here are three stocks to buy if a market crash is coming soon. And the great news about these stocks is that they're solid picks even if it doesn't happen.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3105d12ec8b203883b5e91a709172e8b\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"514\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>Image source: <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GTY\">Getty</a> Images.</p>\n<h3>BioNTech</h3>\n<p>I personally don't think a stock market crash is just around the corner. If <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> is, though, I suspect the cause will be the combination of the COVID-19 pandemic and sky-high market valuations. Assuming I'm right,&nbsp;<b>BioNTech</b> (NASDAQ:BNTX) should soar if the market crashes.</p>\n<p>A massive market sell-off due to COVID-19 worries would almost certainly light a fire beneath the stocks of the leading vaccine makers. My view is that BioNTech would be <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> of the biggest winners in the group.</p>\n<p>BioNTech and its partner <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PFE\">Pfizer</a></b> (NYSE:PFE) are already moving forward with plans to test a vaccine that specifically targets the delta variant. That gives the companies a head start. BioNTech is by far the smallest of the companies with COVID-19 vaccines already on the market, which makes its shares more likely to jump higher on a positive catalyst. It's also easily the cheapest of these vaccine stocks, based on forward earnings multiples.</p>\n<p>What if there isn't an imminent market crash? BioNTech is still set to rake in billions of dollars with sales of its COVID-19 vaccine. The company will almost certainly use its growing cash stockpile to invest in expanding its pipeline. I think that BioNTech will be a winner over the long term, regardless of what happens over the short term.</p>\n<h3><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DG\">Dollar General</a></h3>\n<p>I've maintained for a long time that&nbsp;<b>Dollar <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BGC\">General</a></b> (NYSE:DG) is one of the best stocks to own during a market downturn. That view seemed to be confirmed during the big market meltdown last year.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b0e75aa27d2d22b4296c80687da5be97\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"449\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>DG data by YCharts.</p>\n<p>Shares of Dollar General fell at first, but not nearly as much as most stocks did. Dollar General stock also rebounded much more quickly and trounced the overall market's return throughout the rest of the year.</p>\n<p>During uncertain times, consumers tighten their purse strings. That makes discount retailers such as Dollar General more attractive than ever.</p>\n<p>Even when the overall market performs well, though, Dollar General should still be able to grow. As a case in point, the company's shares delivered more than double the gain that the <b>S&amp;P 500</b> index did in the five years leading up to 2020 when the market was roaring.</p>\n<p>I think that Dollar General will be able to continue to beat the market. It's moving forward with an aggressive expansion strategy. The company is also undertaking a major initiative to \"establish itself as a health destination.\" While Dollar General didn't provide many details on exactly what its plans are, moving more into healthcare sounds like a smart move to me.</p>\n<h3>Viatris</h3>\n<p>There are at least two reasons why a given stock might hold up well during a big market sell-off. One is that its underlying business isn't impacted much by the reason behind the broader plunge. Another is that the stock is so cheap that investors scoop up shares if it falls much below its existing price. My take is that&nbsp;<b>Viatris</b> (NASDAQ:VTRS) qualifies on both of these criteria.</p>\n<p>Viatris specializes in biosimilars and generic drugs. Patients need these drugs, regardless of what the stock market does. The drugs are also less expensive than branded prescription drugs.</p>\n<p>The stock is irrefutably dirt cheap. Viatris' shares trade at a little over four times expected earnings. It's unlikely that the stock is going to move much lower because it would simply be too much of a steal for investors to ignore.</p>\n<p>Granted, Viatris probably won't keep up with the overall stock market's performance if the current uptrend continues. However, the company's dividend is attractive. And over the next several years, Viatris should achieve synergies resulting from the merger of Pfizer's Upjohn unit and Mylan, as well as launch new products that should drive growth.</p>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>3 Stocks to Buy Whether or Not a Market Crash Is Near</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n3 Stocks to Buy Whether or Not a Market Crash Is Near\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-23 21:11 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/23/3-stocks-to-buy-whether-or-not-a-market-crash-is-n/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Rising COVID-19 cases. Concerns about the highly contagious delta variant. The possibility of another housing bubble bursting. These are some of the reasons why worries are increasing among investors ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/23/3-stocks-to-buy-whether-or-not-a-market-crash-is-n/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"DG":"美国达乐公司","BNTX":"BioNTech SE","VTRS":"Viatris Inc."},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/23/3-stocks-to-buy-whether-or-not-a-market-crash-is-n/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2153983997","content_text":"Rising COVID-19 cases. Concerns about the highly contagious delta variant. The possibility of another housing bubble bursting. These are some of the reasons why worries are increasing among investors that a stock market crash could be on the way.\nOne of the biggest stock market bears, Harry Dent Jr., who predicted the dot.com bubble collapsing, even thinks that a market meltdown is likely within the next three months. Is all of the pessimism warranted? Maybe, maybe not.\nIf you're leery about what's around the corner, here are three stocks to buy if a market crash is coming soon. And the great news about these stocks is that they're solid picks even if it doesn't happen.\n\nImage source: Getty Images.\nBioNTech\nI personally don't think a stock market crash is just around the corner. If one is, though, I suspect the cause will be the combination of the COVID-19 pandemic and sky-high market valuations. Assuming I'm right, BioNTech (NASDAQ:BNTX) should soar if the market crashes.\nA massive market sell-off due to COVID-19 worries would almost certainly light a fire beneath the stocks of the leading vaccine makers. My view is that BioNTech would be one of the biggest winners in the group.\nBioNTech and its partner Pfizer (NYSE:PFE) are already moving forward with plans to test a vaccine that specifically targets the delta variant. That gives the companies a head start. BioNTech is by far the smallest of the companies with COVID-19 vaccines already on the market, which makes its shares more likely to jump higher on a positive catalyst. It's also easily the cheapest of these vaccine stocks, based on forward earnings multiples.\nWhat if there isn't an imminent market crash? BioNTech is still set to rake in billions of dollars with sales of its COVID-19 vaccine. The company will almost certainly use its growing cash stockpile to invest in expanding its pipeline. I think that BioNTech will be a winner over the long term, regardless of what happens over the short term.\nDollar General\nI've maintained for a long time that Dollar General (NYSE:DG) is one of the best stocks to own during a market downturn. That view seemed to be confirmed during the big market meltdown last year.\n\nDG data by YCharts.\nShares of Dollar General fell at first, but not nearly as much as most stocks did. Dollar General stock also rebounded much more quickly and trounced the overall market's return throughout the rest of the year.\nDuring uncertain times, consumers tighten their purse strings. That makes discount retailers such as Dollar General more attractive than ever.\nEven when the overall market performs well, though, Dollar General should still be able to grow. As a case in point, the company's shares delivered more than double the gain that the S&P 500 index did in the five years leading up to 2020 when the market was roaring.\nI think that Dollar General will be able to continue to beat the market. It's moving forward with an aggressive expansion strategy. The company is also undertaking a major initiative to \"establish itself as a health destination.\" While Dollar General didn't provide many details on exactly what its plans are, moving more into healthcare sounds like a smart move to me.\nViatris\nThere are at least two reasons why a given stock might hold up well during a big market sell-off. One is that its underlying business isn't impacted much by the reason behind the broader plunge. Another is that the stock is so cheap that investors scoop up shares if it falls much below its existing price. My take is that Viatris (NASDAQ:VTRS) qualifies on both of these criteria.\nViatris specializes in biosimilars and generic drugs. Patients need these drugs, regardless of what the stock market does. The drugs are also less expensive than branded prescription drugs.\nThe stock is irrefutably dirt cheap. Viatris' shares trade at a little over four times expected earnings. It's unlikely that the stock is going to move much lower because it would simply be too much of a steal for investors to ignore.\nGranted, Viatris probably won't keep up with the overall stock market's performance if the current uptrend continues. However, the company's dividend is attractive. And over the next several years, Viatris should achieve synergies resulting from the merger of Pfizer's Upjohn unit and Mylan, as well as launch new products that should drive growth.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":92,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9905804157,"gmtCreate":1659844368981,"gmtModify":1703767038438,"author":{"id":"3574915362300502","authorId":"3574915362300502","name":"Thunderbird","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/86528f4fb847fbbf69680f5b0c603119","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3574915362300502","idStr":"3574915362300502"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9905804157","repostId":"2257199676","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2257199676","pubTimestamp":1659843199,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2257199676?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-08-07 11:33","market":"us","language":"en","title":"AMC Stock: Sell on the Pounce?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2257199676","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"The multiplex operator posted financial results that were roughly in line with expectations. A special dividend could also be Kryptonite for potential synthetic short-sellers.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>AMC Entertainment</b> gave shareholders nearly everything they wanted on Thursday. It posted second-quarter results that may have failed to exceed expectations but confirmed that its turnaround is succeeding on most fronts.</p><p>Adjusted earnings before interest, taxes depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and its operating-cash generated turned positive for the period. The country&#39;s leading multiplex operator also announced a stock dividend that should shake out any potential fake or synthetic short positions in AMC.</p><p>It wasn&#39;t enough. The stock was trading more than 10% lower by Thursday night.</p><p>There&#39;s still a lot to like in AMC&#39;s flawed but encouraging performance. The market may not have been initially impressed, but the stock has rallied sharply since bottoming out in the single digits back in May. Besides, if you&#39;ve plopped yourself down at an AMC screening lately, you know that there&#39;ll be plot twists until the final credits roll.</p><p>We&#39;ve seen dramatic trading-day reversals at AMC before. Let&#39;s take a closer look at the good and the not so good in Thursday&#39;s developments.</p><h2>Everything, everywhere all at once</h2><p>AMC&#39;s revenue rose 162% to $1.1664 billion. It&#39;s a big move, but this was roughly in line with expectations.</p><p>We knew this would be a big step up for the exhibitor. Domestic box-office receipts for the industry in the second quarter soared 186%, compared to the weak slate in the springtime of last year. International exhibitors fared even better -- an important point since 22% of AMC&#39;s top-line results were international.</p><p>Taking a deeper dive into its stateside operations, AMC lost market share -- but this isn&#39;t a deal-breaker. The number of tickets that AMC sold in the U.S. for the quarter rose 144%, and the average price paid per ticket climbed 5.7%. Stack one on top of the other, and you arrive at a 153% year-over-year increase, a big move but well below the national pop. This isn&#39;t a failure on AMC&#39;s part as much as it is smaller chains finally gaining momentum after false starts earlier in the pandemic cycle.</p><p>The truly disappointing metric in terms of theater-level performance is that folks are starting to spend less after scanning their admissions to get into the local multiplex. The average food and beverage revenue per domestic patron has declined 5% over the past year, going from $7.91 to $7.52. The international drop is a more substantial 8% decline.</p><p>This also isn&#39;t awful news. It was only natural for folks to overspend early last year, when returning to the movies after a long absence was a novelty. It&#39;s still comfortably above pre-pandemic spending levels, and as long as it stabilizes here, AMC should be fine with this high-margin part of its business.</p><p>AMC&#39;s adjusted net loss -- once you take out the gain from the early extinguishment of debt and the hit from the sharp drop in market value of its <b>Hycroft Mining </b>investment -- clocks in at $102.8 million, or $0.20 a share. This is also roughly what analysts were modeling, but it&#39;s still encouraging to see AMC&#39;s adjusted bottom line generating less than a third of the red ink it was gushing a year earlier.</p><p>With its operating cash generated and adjusted EBITDA now firmly positive, AMC is in a better position to tackle its rising borrowing costs (because cash interest expense has climbed 60% over the past year).</p><h2>Uncharted</h2><p>In a move to bust the potential ring of fake short-sellers, AMC also declared a special dividend of an AMC Preferred share for every share outstanding. It will essentially be the equivalent of a 2-for-1 stock split, only the preferred stock will trade under the ticker symbol APE when it&#39;s distributed in two weeks.</p><p>The move is intended to smoke out illegal shorts, but once again, we had CEO Adam Aron tweeting on Thursday night that he&#39;s seen no evidence of synthetic shorting of the multiplex operator.</p><blockquote>6. Candidly I&#39;ve seen no evidence so-called fake or synthetic shares exist. But many of you disagree. This preferred equity dividend goes ONLY to company issued shares. So, it will have the impact of a &#34;share count&#34; or unique dividend many of you have sought. #TodayWePounce</blockquote><p>Aron is giving some of the loudest retail shareholders what they want. As long as he also continues to give moviegoers what they want -- and that&#39;s just what we saw in the quarterly numbers -- AMC should be fine as the top dog of movie-theater stocks.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>AMC Stock: Sell on the Pounce?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAMC Stock: Sell on the Pounce?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-08-07 11:33 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/08/05/amc-stock-sell-on-the-pounce/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>AMC Entertainment gave shareholders nearly everything they wanted on Thursday. It posted second-quarter results that may have failed to exceed expectations but confirmed that its turnaround is ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/08/05/amc-stock-sell-on-the-pounce/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AMC":"AMC院线"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/08/05/amc-stock-sell-on-the-pounce/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2257199676","content_text":"AMC Entertainment gave shareholders nearly everything they wanted on Thursday. It posted second-quarter results that may have failed to exceed expectations but confirmed that its turnaround is succeeding on most fronts.Adjusted earnings before interest, taxes depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and its operating-cash generated turned positive for the period. The country's leading multiplex operator also announced a stock dividend that should shake out any potential fake or synthetic short positions in AMC.It wasn't enough. The stock was trading more than 10% lower by Thursday night.There's still a lot to like in AMC's flawed but encouraging performance. The market may not have been initially impressed, but the stock has rallied sharply since bottoming out in the single digits back in May. Besides, if you've plopped yourself down at an AMC screening lately, you know that there'll be plot twists until the final credits roll.We've seen dramatic trading-day reversals at AMC before. Let's take a closer look at the good and the not so good in Thursday's developments.Everything, everywhere all at onceAMC's revenue rose 162% to $1.1664 billion. It's a big move, but this was roughly in line with expectations.We knew this would be a big step up for the exhibitor. Domestic box-office receipts for the industry in the second quarter soared 186%, compared to the weak slate in the springtime of last year. International exhibitors fared even better -- an important point since 22% of AMC's top-line results were international.Taking a deeper dive into its stateside operations, AMC lost market share -- but this isn't a deal-breaker. The number of tickets that AMC sold in the U.S. for the quarter rose 144%, and the average price paid per ticket climbed 5.7%. Stack one on top of the other, and you arrive at a 153% year-over-year increase, a big move but well below the national pop. This isn't a failure on AMC's part as much as it is smaller chains finally gaining momentum after false starts earlier in the pandemic cycle.The truly disappointing metric in terms of theater-level performance is that folks are starting to spend less after scanning their admissions to get into the local multiplex. The average food and beverage revenue per domestic patron has declined 5% over the past year, going from $7.91 to $7.52. The international drop is a more substantial 8% decline.This also isn't awful news. It was only natural for folks to overspend early last year, when returning to the movies after a long absence was a novelty. It's still comfortably above pre-pandemic spending levels, and as long as it stabilizes here, AMC should be fine with this high-margin part of its business.AMC's adjusted net loss -- once you take out the gain from the early extinguishment of debt and the hit from the sharp drop in market value of its Hycroft Mining investment -- clocks in at $102.8 million, or $0.20 a share. This is also roughly what analysts were modeling, but it's still encouraging to see AMC's adjusted bottom line generating less than a third of the red ink it was gushing a year earlier.With its operating cash generated and adjusted EBITDA now firmly positive, AMC is in a better position to tackle its rising borrowing costs (because cash interest expense has climbed 60% over the past year).UnchartedIn a move to bust the potential ring of fake short-sellers, AMC also declared a special dividend of an AMC Preferred share for every share outstanding. It will essentially be the equivalent of a 2-for-1 stock split, only the preferred stock will trade under the ticker symbol APE when it's distributed in two weeks.The move is intended to smoke out illegal shorts, but once again, we had CEO Adam Aron tweeting on Thursday night that he's seen no evidence of synthetic shorting of the multiplex operator.6. Candidly I've seen no evidence so-called fake or synthetic shares exist. But many of you disagree. This preferred equity dividend goes ONLY to company issued shares. So, it will have the impact of a \"share count\" or unique dividend many of you have sought. #TodayWePounceAron is giving some of the loudest retail shareholders what they want. As long as he also continues to give moviegoers what they want -- and that's just what we saw in the quarterly numbers -- AMC should be fine as the top dog of movie-theater stocks.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":25,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":897487506,"gmtCreate":1628959702705,"gmtModify":1676529900311,"author":{"id":"3574915362300502","authorId":"3574915362300502","name":"Thunderbird","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/86528f4fb847fbbf69680f5b0c603119","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3574915362300502","idStr":"3574915362300502"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like please","listText":"Like please","text":"Like please","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/897487506","repostId":"2159321505","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2159321505","pubTimestamp":1628911811,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2159321505?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-08-14 11:30","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Tesla seeks to reduce board members’ terms, make other changes in October shareholder meeting","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2159321505","media":"MarketWatch","summary":"Board members would serve for two years rather than three\nTesla CEO Elon Musk in Germany last year. ","content":"<p>Board members would serve for two years rather than three</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/abc701f141f0c0044cabe912e510fe2e\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Tesla CEO Elon Musk in Germany last year. MAJA HITIJ/GETTY IMAGES</span></p>\n<p>Tesla Inc. set its shareholder meeting for Oct. 7 at the Fremont, Calif., factory, with a call for reducing its directors’ terms among the proposals the electric-car maker will bring to the table, the company said in filing late Friday.</p>\n<p>One of the proposals calls for each director’s term to be reduced from three years to two years. Tesla’s&nbsp;board currently has nine members who are divided into three classes in staggered three-year terms.</p>\n<p>If the proposal is approved, however, the board will be divided into two classes with staggered two-year terms, with directors distributed as equally between the classes as possible, Tesla said in the&nbsp;filing.</p>\n<p>The board would be reduced to eight members, since Antonio Gracias, a venture capitalist who has served on the Tesla board since 2007, said in 2019 he’d not be seeking reelection when his term ends this year.</p>\n<p>Tesla’s board nominated current board members James Murdoch, the youngest son of News Corp&nbsp;founder Rupert Murdoch, and Kimbal Musk, Chief Executive Elon Musk’s brother, for re-election as class II directors, with terms expiring in 2024. If the term reduction is approved, then their terms would end in 2023, the company said.</p>\n<p>Tesla’s curtailing board member terms was a response to a shareholder proposal calling to elect each board member for one year.</p>\n<p>The two-year term, however, “strikes a suitable balance to the long-term interests of and nearer-term accountability to our stockholders at this time,” Tesla said.</p>\n<p>Tesla shares were flat in after-hours trading after ending the regular trading day down 0.7%. The stock has gained 1.6% this year, compared with gains of around 19% for the S&amp;P 500 index.</p>","source":"lsy1603348471595","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Tesla seeks to reduce board members’ terms, make other changes in October shareholder meeting</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTesla seeks to reduce board members’ terms, make other changes in October shareholder meeting\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-08-14 11:30 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.marketwatch.com/story/tesla-seeks-to-reduce-board-terms-in-october-shareholder-meeting-11628888340?mod=newsviewer_click><strong>MarketWatch</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Board members would serve for two years rather than three\nTesla CEO Elon Musk in Germany last year. MAJA HITIJ/GETTY IMAGES\nTesla Inc. set its shareholder meeting for Oct. 7 at the Fremont, Calif., ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/tesla-seeks-to-reduce-board-terms-in-october-shareholder-meeting-11628888340?mod=newsviewer_click\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/tesla-seeks-to-reduce-board-terms-in-october-shareholder-meeting-11628888340?mod=newsviewer_click","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2159321505","content_text":"Board members would serve for two years rather than three\nTesla CEO Elon Musk in Germany last year. MAJA HITIJ/GETTY IMAGES\nTesla Inc. set its shareholder meeting for Oct. 7 at the Fremont, Calif., factory, with a call for reducing its directors’ terms among the proposals the electric-car maker will bring to the table, the company said in filing late Friday.\nOne of the proposals calls for each director’s term to be reduced from three years to two years. Tesla’s board currently has nine members who are divided into three classes in staggered three-year terms.\nIf the proposal is approved, however, the board will be divided into two classes with staggered two-year terms, with directors distributed as equally between the classes as possible, Tesla said in the filing.\nThe board would be reduced to eight members, since Antonio Gracias, a venture capitalist who has served on the Tesla board since 2007, said in 2019 he’d not be seeking reelection when his term ends this year.\nTesla’s board nominated current board members James Murdoch, the youngest son of News Corp founder Rupert Murdoch, and Kimbal Musk, Chief Executive Elon Musk’s brother, for re-election as class II directors, with terms expiring in 2024. If the term reduction is approved, then their terms would end in 2023, the company said.\nTesla’s curtailing board member terms was a response to a shareholder proposal calling to elect each board member for one year.\nThe two-year term, however, “strikes a suitable balance to the long-term interests of and nearer-term accountability to our stockholders at this time,” Tesla said.\nTesla shares were flat in after-hours trading after ending the regular trading day down 0.7%. The stock has gained 1.6% this year, compared with gains of around 19% for the S&P 500 index.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":98,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":144641789,"gmtCreate":1626285681041,"gmtModify":1703757174367,"author":{"id":"3574915362300502","authorId":"3574915362300502","name":"Thunderbird","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/86528f4fb847fbbf69680f5b0c603119","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3574915362300502","idStr":"3574915362300502"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Finally..... stupid pple. Get this and over with.","listText":"Finally..... stupid pple. Get this and over with.","text":"Finally..... stupid pple. Get this and over with.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/144641789","repostId":"1181513394","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1181513394","pubTimestamp":1626276027,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1181513394?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-14 23:20","market":"fut","language":"en","title":"OPEC reportedly reaches compromise on oil production after dispute with UAE","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1181513394","media":"CNBC","summary":"DUBAI, United Arab Emirates — The Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries on Wednesday arrived","content":"<div>\n<p>DUBAI, United Arab Emirates — The Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries on Wednesday arrived at a deal after a nearly two-week standoff over its future oil production levels, according to ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/07/14/opec-reportedly-reaches-compromise-on-oil-production-after-dispute-with-uae.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"cnbc_highlight","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>OPEC reportedly reaches compromise on oil production after dispute with UAE</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nOPEC reportedly reaches compromise on oil production after dispute with UAE\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-14 23:20 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.cnbc.com/2021/07/14/opec-reportedly-reaches-compromise-on-oil-production-after-dispute-with-uae.html><strong>CNBC</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>DUBAI, United Arab Emirates — The Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries on Wednesday arrived at a deal after a nearly two-week standoff over its future oil production levels, according to ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/07/14/opec-reportedly-reaches-compromise-on-oil-production-after-dispute-with-uae.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"XOM":"埃克森美孚"},"source_url":"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/07/14/opec-reportedly-reaches-compromise-on-oil-production-after-dispute-with-uae.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/72bb72e1b84c09fca865c6dcb1bbcd16","article_id":"1181513394","content_text":"DUBAI, United Arab Emirates — The Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries on Wednesday arrived at a deal after a nearly two-week standoff over its future oil production levels, according to reports by theWall Street JournalandReuters.\nThe temporary but unprecedented gridlock that began in early July saw the United Arab Emirates reject a coordinated oil production plan for the group spearheaded by its kingpin, Saudi Arabia.\nAbu Dhabi had demanded that its own \"baseline\" for crude production — the maximum volume it's recognized by OPEC as being able to produce — be raised because this figure then determines the size of production cuts and quotas it must follow as per the group's output agreements. Members cut the same percentage from their baseline, so having a higher baseline would allow the UAE a greater production quota.\nThe UAE initially called for its baseline to be raised from 3.2 million barrels a day to 3.8 million barrels a day. According to sources cited by the Wall Street Journal, the compromise reached between Saudi Arabia and its smaller neighbor will raise the UAE's baseline to 3.65 million barrels per day from April 2022. The reports have not been officially confirmed, and OPEC and the Saudi energy ministry did not reply to CNBC requests for comment.\nThe initial agreement supported by most OPEC delegates set out a plan for the group to collectively bring production up to 400,000 barrels of crude per day monthly through to the end of 2022. This would end the remaining limits that were set in the spring of 2020, as economic recovery and growing demand for oil have broughtcrude prices up to their highest level since late 2018.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":68,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":120902098,"gmtCreate":1624290702514,"gmtModify":1703832712496,"author":{"id":"3574915362300502","authorId":"3574915362300502","name":"Thunderbird","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/86528f4fb847fbbf69680f5b0c603119","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3574915362300502","idStr":"3574915362300502"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Let’s buy some and push up the price !","listText":"Let’s buy some and push up the price !","text":"Let’s buy some and push up the price !","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/120902098","repostId":"2145084835","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2145084835","pubTimestamp":1624280460,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2145084835?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-21 21:01","market":"us","language":"en","title":"5 Ultra-Popular Stocks Wall Street Views as Overvalued","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2145084835","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"If analysts are correct, these high-flying stocks will fizzle out over the next year.","content":"<p>Generally speaking, it pays to be bullish on Wall Street. Despite navigating its way through Black Monday in 1987, the dot-com bubble, the Great Recession, and more recently the coronavirus crash, the average annual total return for the benchmark <b>S&amp;P 500</b> since 1980, including dividends, is north of 11%.</p>\n<p>Not surprisingly, we see this optimism readily apparent in Wall Street's ratings on stocks. According to <b>FactSet</b>, more than half of all stocks carry a consensus buy rating, 38% have the equivalent of a hold rating, and just 7% are rated as sells. Yet, history shows that far more than 7% of stocks will eventually head lower.</p>\n<p>Based on Wall Street's consensus price targets, the following five ultra-popular stocks are all expected to lose value over the coming 12 months.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b04ade705354c4825038c4dfcd0187d9\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"500\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>Image source: Getty Images.</p>\n<h3>Palantir Technologies: Implied downside of 12%</h3>\n<p>Since its direct listing in late September 2020, data-mining company <b>Palantir Technologies</b> (NYSE:PLTR) has been a favorite among growth and retail investors. But if Wall Street's <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE\">one</a>-year consensus price target proves accurate, Palantir will head in reverse by up to 12%.</p>\n<p>The likeliest reason Wall Street is tempering expectations on Palantir is valuation. Specifically, Palantir ended June 17 with a market cap of nearly $48 billion, but is on track to bring in perhaps $1.5 billion in full-year sales in 2021. That's a multiple of about 32 times sales. Even if Palantir continues to grow its top-line at 30% annually, it could take years for this price-to-sales multiple to come down to anywhere close to the average for cloud stocks.</p>\n<p>Another possible concern is the growth potential for its government-focused Gotham platform. Big government contract wins in the U.S. have been primarily responsible for Palantir's exceptional growth rate. However, there remains an outside chance that President Joe Biden may curb funding to some of the federal agencies that employ Palantir's services.</p>\n<p>Over the long run, I'm optimistic and believe Palantir's platform is unlike anything else available. But tempering near-term expectations given its valuation premium may be warranted.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a38605bee8e62f3e8aa414fa24278e7e\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>Image source: Getty Images.</p>\n<h3>Moderna: Implied downside of 11%</h3>\n<p>Biotech stock <b>Moderna</b> (NASDAQ:MRNA) is arguably the biggest beneficiary of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. It's <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> of only three drugmakers to currently have their COVID-19 vaccine approved on an emergency-use authorization (EUA) basis in the United States. But if Wall Street's consensus 12-month price target is correct, it's stock is also on its way to a double-digit decline.</p>\n<p>Why the lack of love from Wall Street? The answer looks to be analysts looking to the future. While Moderna's COVID-19 vaccine is a mainstay in the U.S., and it's likely to play a clear role in other markets, time might prove the company's enemy. Over time, new vaccines are expected to come onto the scene, which'll eat away at Moderna's potential pool of patients.</p>\n<p>The other worry is that no one is exactly certain how long COVID-19 vaccine immunity will last. If it's a year, Moderna is unlikely to be the only drugmaker supplying booster shots. Meanwhile, if it's longer than a year, it means reduced sales opportunities for the company.</p>\n<p>Based solely on Wall Street's earnings per share consensus in 2021 and 2022, Moderna appears reasonably priced. But with the company staring down a potentially significant haircut in revenue next year as new drugmakers enter the space, caution is advised.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/07841e6a8173146a0fbfddf95a0f1ccb\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>Image source: Getty Images.</p>\n<h3>GameStop: Implied downside of 71%</h3>\n<p>This will probably come as a shock to no one, but Reddit favorite <b>GameStop</b> (NYSE:GME) is fully expected to fall flat on its face. Even though Wall Street's consensus price target for the company has quintupled in recent months, it <i>still</i> implies up to 71% downside over the next year.</p>\n<p>The biggest issue for GameStop is that its valuation has completely detached from its underlying fundamentals. While it's not uncommon for stocks to trade on emotion for short periods of time, operating performance is what always dictates the long-term movement in the share price of a stock. When it comes to operating performance, GameStop has been a dud.</p>\n<p>Although the company's first-quarter fiscal results highlighted a 25% net sales increase from the prior-year period, total sales for the company have been falling precipitously for years. That's because video game retailer GameStop recognized the shift to digital gaming too late, and it's now stuck with its massive portfolio of brick-and-mortar gaming stores. Even though e-commerce sales have been a bright spot for the company, slashing costs and closing stores remains its No. 1 priority.</p>\n<p>With sufficient cash, bankruptcy isn't a concern for GameStop. But without any true top-line growth and the company still losing money, it's an impossible sell at its current price tag.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c7ff785aa0040a5565d474390f58b47a\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"457\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>Image source: Getty Images.</p>\n<h3>Ocugen: Implied downside of 18%</h3>\n<p>Volatile clinical-stage biotech stock <b>Ocugen</b> (NASDAQ:OCGN) may also be in for an unpleasant next 12 months. The company behind an experimental COVID-19 vaccine (Covaxin) and a trio of internally developed eye-blindness candidates is expected to shed 18% of its value, if Wall Street's consensus price target is correct.</p>\n<p>Arguably the biggest issue for Ocugen is the clinical update the company issued on June 10 concerning Covaxin. Even though partner Bharat Biotech led a large clinical study in India that yielded an overall efficacy of 78%, along with 100% efficacy in preventing severe forms of COVID-19, Ocugen announced on June 10 that it would forgo seeking an EUA in the U.S. and would instead file for a biologics license application. In other words, Ocugen's path to a quick emergency approval in the U.S. just flew out the window.</p>\n<p>What's more, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's requested additional information and data on Covaxin. This is a fancy of saying that Ocugen will very likely have to run a clinical study in the U.S. prior to submitting Covaxin for approval. That means added costs and an even longer wait before Ocugen has a chance to penetrate the lucrative U.S. market.</p>\n<p>Though it's impossible to predict how long COVID-19 vaccine immunity will last, Ocugen's chances of being a significant player in the U.S. COVID-19 vaccine space are dwindling.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/91f6037829ea3fb0ae1cae0b95d8d11e\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>Image source: Getty Images.</p>\n<h3>NVIDIA: Implied downside of 3%</h3>\n<p>Don't adjust your computer, laptop, or smartphone screens -- that really says <b>NVIDIA</b> (NASDAQ:NVDA). Following its incredible run higher (NVIDIA has doubled over the past year), graphics processing unit giant NVIDIA closed 3% above Wall Street's consensus price target, as of June 17.</p>\n<p>One reason for tempered expectations at this point has to be valuation. Even with NVIDIA crushing expectations and seeing strong PC gaming demand, sales growth is expected to slow from an estimated 49% in fiscal 2022 to a high single digit percentage in each of the next two fiscal years. In fact, the company closed at nearly 20 times projected sales for the current fiscal year. That's a bit optimistic given an expected sales growth slowdown.</p>\n<p>Perhaps the other reason Wall Street expects NVIDIA to go sideways is the company's cryptocurrency mining chip segment. While sales of crypto chips could hit $400 million in the current quarter, demand is entirely dependent on the hype surrounding digital currencies and the favorability of technical charts. Crypto is just as well known for its long bear markets as it is for the big gains it's delivered over the past decade. If another lull strikes, a fast-growing ancillary segment for NVIDA could easily become a drag.</p>\n<p>For what it's worth, I see no fundamental reasons to sell NVIDIA if you're already a long-term shareholder. But if you're on the outside looking in, I don't exactly see $746 as an attractive entry point, either.</p>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>5 Ultra-Popular Stocks Wall Street Views as Overvalued</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n5 Ultra-Popular Stocks Wall Street Views as Overvalued\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-06-21 21:01 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/06/21/5-ultra-popular-stocks-wall-street-view-overvalued/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Generally speaking, it pays to be bullish on Wall Street. Despite navigating its way through Black Monday in 1987, the dot-com bubble, the Great Recession, and more recently the coronavirus crash, the...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/06/21/5-ultra-popular-stocks-wall-street-view-overvalued/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"GME":"游戏驿站","PLTR":"Palantir Technologies Inc.","OCGN":"Ocugen","NVDA":"英伟达","MRNA":"Moderna, Inc."},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/06/21/5-ultra-popular-stocks-wall-street-view-overvalued/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2145084835","content_text":"Generally speaking, it pays to be bullish on Wall Street. Despite navigating its way through Black Monday in 1987, the dot-com bubble, the Great Recession, and more recently the coronavirus crash, the average annual total return for the benchmark S&P 500 since 1980, including dividends, is north of 11%.\nNot surprisingly, we see this optimism readily apparent in Wall Street's ratings on stocks. According to FactSet, more than half of all stocks carry a consensus buy rating, 38% have the equivalent of a hold rating, and just 7% are rated as sells. Yet, history shows that far more than 7% of stocks will eventually head lower.\nBased on Wall Street's consensus price targets, the following five ultra-popular stocks are all expected to lose value over the coming 12 months.\n\nImage source: Getty Images.\nPalantir Technologies: Implied downside of 12%\nSince its direct listing in late September 2020, data-mining company Palantir Technologies (NYSE:PLTR) has been a favorite among growth and retail investors. But if Wall Street's one-year consensus price target proves accurate, Palantir will head in reverse by up to 12%.\nThe likeliest reason Wall Street is tempering expectations on Palantir is valuation. Specifically, Palantir ended June 17 with a market cap of nearly $48 billion, but is on track to bring in perhaps $1.5 billion in full-year sales in 2021. That's a multiple of about 32 times sales. Even if Palantir continues to grow its top-line at 30% annually, it could take years for this price-to-sales multiple to come down to anywhere close to the average for cloud stocks.\nAnother possible concern is the growth potential for its government-focused Gotham platform. Big government contract wins in the U.S. have been primarily responsible for Palantir's exceptional growth rate. However, there remains an outside chance that President Joe Biden may curb funding to some of the federal agencies that employ Palantir's services.\nOver the long run, I'm optimistic and believe Palantir's platform is unlike anything else available. But tempering near-term expectations given its valuation premium may be warranted.\n\nImage source: Getty Images.\nModerna: Implied downside of 11%\nBiotech stock Moderna (NASDAQ:MRNA) is arguably the biggest beneficiary of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. It's one of only three drugmakers to currently have their COVID-19 vaccine approved on an emergency-use authorization (EUA) basis in the United States. But if Wall Street's consensus 12-month price target is correct, it's stock is also on its way to a double-digit decline.\nWhy the lack of love from Wall Street? The answer looks to be analysts looking to the future. While Moderna's COVID-19 vaccine is a mainstay in the U.S., and it's likely to play a clear role in other markets, time might prove the company's enemy. Over time, new vaccines are expected to come onto the scene, which'll eat away at Moderna's potential pool of patients.\nThe other worry is that no one is exactly certain how long COVID-19 vaccine immunity will last. If it's a year, Moderna is unlikely to be the only drugmaker supplying booster shots. Meanwhile, if it's longer than a year, it means reduced sales opportunities for the company.\nBased solely on Wall Street's earnings per share consensus in 2021 and 2022, Moderna appears reasonably priced. But with the company staring down a potentially significant haircut in revenue next year as new drugmakers enter the space, caution is advised.\n\nImage source: Getty Images.\nGameStop: Implied downside of 71%\nThis will probably come as a shock to no one, but Reddit favorite GameStop (NYSE:GME) is fully expected to fall flat on its face. Even though Wall Street's consensus price target for the company has quintupled in recent months, it still implies up to 71% downside over the next year.\nThe biggest issue for GameStop is that its valuation has completely detached from its underlying fundamentals. While it's not uncommon for stocks to trade on emotion for short periods of time, operating performance is what always dictates the long-term movement in the share price of a stock. When it comes to operating performance, GameStop has been a dud.\nAlthough the company's first-quarter fiscal results highlighted a 25% net sales increase from the prior-year period, total sales for the company have been falling precipitously for years. That's because video game retailer GameStop recognized the shift to digital gaming too late, and it's now stuck with its massive portfolio of brick-and-mortar gaming stores. Even though e-commerce sales have been a bright spot for the company, slashing costs and closing stores remains its No. 1 priority.\nWith sufficient cash, bankruptcy isn't a concern for GameStop. But without any true top-line growth and the company still losing money, it's an impossible sell at its current price tag.\n\nImage source: Getty Images.\nOcugen: Implied downside of 18%\nVolatile clinical-stage biotech stock Ocugen (NASDAQ:OCGN) may also be in for an unpleasant next 12 months. The company behind an experimental COVID-19 vaccine (Covaxin) and a trio of internally developed eye-blindness candidates is expected to shed 18% of its value, if Wall Street's consensus price target is correct.\nArguably the biggest issue for Ocugen is the clinical update the company issued on June 10 concerning Covaxin. Even though partner Bharat Biotech led a large clinical study in India that yielded an overall efficacy of 78%, along with 100% efficacy in preventing severe forms of COVID-19, Ocugen announced on June 10 that it would forgo seeking an EUA in the U.S. and would instead file for a biologics license application. In other words, Ocugen's path to a quick emergency approval in the U.S. just flew out the window.\nWhat's more, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's requested additional information and data on Covaxin. This is a fancy of saying that Ocugen will very likely have to run a clinical study in the U.S. prior to submitting Covaxin for approval. That means added costs and an even longer wait before Ocugen has a chance to penetrate the lucrative U.S. market.\nThough it's impossible to predict how long COVID-19 vaccine immunity will last, Ocugen's chances of being a significant player in the U.S. COVID-19 vaccine space are dwindling.\n\nImage source: Getty Images.\nNVIDIA: Implied downside of 3%\nDon't adjust your computer, laptop, or smartphone screens -- that really says NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA). Following its incredible run higher (NVIDIA has doubled over the past year), graphics processing unit giant NVIDIA closed 3% above Wall Street's consensus price target, as of June 17.\nOne reason for tempered expectations at this point has to be valuation. Even with NVIDIA crushing expectations and seeing strong PC gaming demand, sales growth is expected to slow from an estimated 49% in fiscal 2022 to a high single digit percentage in each of the next two fiscal years. In fact, the company closed at nearly 20 times projected sales for the current fiscal year. That's a bit optimistic given an expected sales growth slowdown.\nPerhaps the other reason Wall Street expects NVIDIA to go sideways is the company's cryptocurrency mining chip segment. While sales of crypto chips could hit $400 million in the current quarter, demand is entirely dependent on the hype surrounding digital currencies and the favorability of technical charts. Crypto is just as well known for its long bear markets as it is for the big gains it's delivered over the past decade. If another lull strikes, a fast-growing ancillary segment for NVIDA could easily become a drag.\nFor what it's worth, I see no fundamental reasons to sell NVIDIA if you're already a long-term shareholder. But if you're on the outside looking in, I don't exactly see $746 as an attractive entry point, either.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":77,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9916257067,"gmtCreate":1664608581660,"gmtModify":1676537484818,"author":{"id":"3574915362300502","authorId":"3574915362300502","name":"Thunderbird","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/86528f4fb847fbbf69680f5b0c603119","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3574915362300502","idStr":"3574915362300502"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"All are dropping&nbsp;","listText":"All are dropping&nbsp;","text":"All are dropping","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9916257067","repostId":"1133444550","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":545,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9902773475,"gmtCreate":1659759545800,"gmtModify":1703766359824,"author":{"id":"3574915362300502","authorId":"3574915362300502","name":"Thunderbird","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/86528f4fb847fbbf69680f5b0c603119","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3574915362300502","idStr":"3574915362300502"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"BYD? Think it will be a strong competitor for Tesla.","listText":"BYD? Think it will be a strong competitor for Tesla.","text":"BYD? Think it will be a strong competitor for Tesla.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":8,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9902773475","repostId":"1169492962","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1169492962","pubTimestamp":1659757863,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1169492962?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-08-06 11:51","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Tesla: No Competitor Yet From EV Startups","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1169492962","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"SummaryAs the EV race heats up, EV startups that went public in the past year have average one-year ","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>Summary</b></p><ul><li>As the EV race heats up, EV startups that went public in the past year have average one-year returns of -56%, showing the need for &#34;brand equity.&#34;</li><li>EV startups are in trouble as sales have been minimal, venture money has dried up, and share prices have plummeted.</li><li>Tesla is facing little competition from these EVs startups in the U.S. and Europe.</li><li>Tesla&#39;s greatest challenge will come from traditional automotive companies with EV products.</li></ul><p>In an increasingly competitive business as incumbent automakers introduce their own EVs, startups are in trouble as sales have been minimal, venture money has dried up, and share prices have plummeted.</p><p>I discussed in detail the lengths some of these startups have gone through to go public and get operating capital by forming Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (SPAC), which are shell companies that have no operations but go public with the intention of merging with or acquiring a company using the proceeds of the SPAC&#39;s IPO. I noted in my July 27, 2022, Seeking Alpha article entitled &#34;MOKE + EV Technology Group: The Cost And Value Of &#39;Brand Equity&#39; In The EV Automotive Value Chain:&#34;</p><blockquote>&#34;SPACs contributed half of the $29 billion raised publicly by EV manufacturers, suppliers and charging firms in 2021. EV startups Nikola (NKLA), Lordstown Motors (RIDE), Canoo (GOEV), Faraday Future Intelligent Electric (FFIE), Fisker (FSR), and Lucid Group (LCID) all went public through SPAC deals over the last two years.&#34;</blockquote><p>SPACs go public at $10 per share, a price point that serves as a simple benchmark for how those stocks have been received. Of these SPAC companies, only the share price of Lucid Group is above its IPO price at $18.25, as shown in Chart 1.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d5714c58d0d64a5bccfd46926742db3f\" tg-width=\"634\" tg-height=\"484\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>YCharts</p><p>Chart 1</p><p><b>Is There a Doctor in the House?</b></p><p>In Tables 1-3, I break down the current crop of EV startups by <i>level of funding</i> from all sources and compare each to Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA). Table 1 shows the first five ranked companies. I don&#39;t include Rivian Automotive (RIVN), which would top the list by accumulating $10.7 billion in funding. Rivian&#39;s shares are down 65.95% since the IPO in 11/21, and the company continues to struggle. Layoffs at Rivian started in late July 2022 as the company races to cut costs amid a challenging economic climate and pressure to increase production. It delivered 1,227 vehicles in the first quarter and reported 4,467 deliveries in Q2. Rivian is targeting production of 25,000 vehicles this year, half of its initial production guidance for 2022.</p><p>Table 1 shows significant variations in financial metrics among the five companies. TSLA shows positive TTM revenue, Net Income, and Gross Profit. All the startups reported TTM Revenue, but only Li Auto (LI) reported a positive Net Income and Gross Profit.</p><p>Lucid Group was the top fund raiser on this list. Lucid delivered 360 EVs, helping to account for $57.7 million in revenue in Q1 2022, but revised its 2022 production volume outlook to a range of 6K to 7K vehicles following the release of itsQ2 results. Guidance earlier in the year was for production volume of 12K to 14K vehicles.</p><p>China&#39;s NIO (NIO) delivered 25,059 electric cars in Q2, which is slightly above the guidance of 23,000-25,000. So far this year, NIO globally sold 50,827 electric cars. But NIO reported a loss from operations was RMB2,445.1 million (US$383.7 million) in the fourth quarter of 2021, representing an increase of 162.5% from the fourth quarter of 2020 and an increase of 146.5% from the third quarter of 2021.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/dfe93875be1bf07e575523460045fcdf\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"169\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>Seeking Alpha</p><p>Chart 2 shows a similar story based on one-year share price percent change for the companies listed in Table 1. TSLA is the only company showing positive growth at 29.72% as of the close on July 29, 2022. LI share price was -1.65%. NIO share price is down 55.84% showing investors the COVID situation in China remains fluid and EV shares in general remain under a cloud amid rising interest rates and fears of a global recession.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/efe4c7e633c9284904c710ab74634088\" tg-width=\"634\" tg-height=\"484\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>YCharts</p><p>Chart 2</p><p>Table 2 shows TSLA compared with startups ranked #5-8 based on level of funding. Only Fisker reported TTM revenues of just $96,000. Wall Street was initially attracted to its asset-light business model based on contract manufacturing. However, declining investor appetite for pre-revenue companies has taken the focus away from companies like Fisker.</p><p>That will change as the Fisker Ocean is set to start production in November 2022 and sold exclusively through the Fisker app. According to the company, reservations for the Ocean electric SUV surpassed 50,000, a significant rise from the 40,000 preorders announced in early April. The Ocean with the base Sport trim priced at $37,499 before incentives.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3a779539168c1ed560346f0bd91e702a\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"172\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>Seeking Alpha</p><p>Chart 3 shows one-year share price percent change for the companies listed in Table 2. Again, TSLA is the only company showing positive growth at 29.72% as of the close on July 29, 2022. FSR share price is down 40.57%. The stock is trading below its IPO price.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c79d2a4a21567a786f5279bb8518a03d\" tg-width=\"634\" tg-height=\"484\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>YCharts</p><p>Chart 3</p><p>Table 3 shows the remaining EV startups, but funding has not been disclosed. Of the four startups, only Ayro (AYRO) showed positive TTM revenue of just $2.92M but net income was -$32.01M. Ayro has a different business model than the other companies included in this article as it designs and manufactures electric vehicles for closed campus mobility, urban and community transport, local on-demand and last mile delivery, and government use. The company provides four-wheeled purpose-built electric vehicles for universities, business and medical campuses, last mile delivery services, and food service providers.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7f10fa589992a7ab699d73dbc255e0f0\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"171\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>Seeking Alpha</p><p>Chart 4 shows one-year share price percent change for the companies listed in Table 3. Again, TSLA is the only company showing positive growth at 29.72% as of the close on July 29, 2022. All others have exhibited large negative double-digit share performance.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cd4ac75c6f128418a1b06ff8262e2389\" tg-width=\"634\" tg-height=\"484\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>YCharts</p><p>Chart 4</p><p><b>Tesla&#39;s Performance</b></p><p>Tesla reported a mixed Q2 earnings report on in its Q2 earnings call on July 20, 2022. Adjusted earnings per share came in at $2.27 vs. $1.81 expected. Revenue missed at $16.93 billion vs. $17.1 billion expected. Chart 5 shows quarterly performance through Q2 2022.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4052a39627697f9c8983ee7159207dee\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"298\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>YCharts</p><p>Chart 5</p><p>In Q2 2022, TSLA achieved record production rates across the company, producing more than 258,000 vehicles and delivered 254,695 vehicles. That was below consensus estimates of 266,795 vehicles, and down from 310,048 in 1Q 2022, as the company faced a continuation of manufacturing challenges related to shutdowns, global supply chain disruptions, labor shortages and logistics and other complications, which limited its ability to consistently run our factories at full capacity.</p><p>While the Shanghai factory was shut down fully and then partially for the majority of Q2, TSLA ended the quarter with a record monthly production level. Recent equipment upgrades will enable the company to continue to increase its production rate further.</p><p>The Fremont Factory made a record number of vehicles in Q2. I see opportunities for further production rate improvements. The next generation of 4680 battery cell machinery has been installed in Texas and is in the process of commissioning. Factory output in Texas continues to grow.</p><p>Gigafactory Berlin-Brandenburg reached an important milestone of over 1,000 cars produced in a single week while achieving positive gross margin during the quarter. Tesla expect the production rate to continue improving through the rest of the year.</p><p>Table 4 shows U.S. EV shipments for Q2 2021 and Q2 2022 by model. In Q2, Tesla was the top-selling luxury brand in the U.S., outpacing all the established names: Audi, BMW, Cadillac, Lexus, Mercedes-Benz, as seen in Table 4.</p><p>EV sales as a percentage of total automobile sales. In Q2, EV sales accounted for 5.6% of the total market, an increase from 5.3% in Q1. EV share in Q2 2021 was 2.7%. In Q2 2021, there were 19 EV models for sale in the U.S. One year later, the number jumped to 33.</p><p>Table 4 - Source: Cox Automotive</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/426fa2458fb9e40d222a5fc1f897b9c9\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"566\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>Cox Automotive</p><p>However, as new EV models continue to enter the market, Tesla&#39;s share of the EV segment is dropping. Last quarter, it fell to 66.1%, down from 74.6% in Q1 2022, as shown in Table 5. Tesla shipments by model are also shown. Importantly, Tesla is losing market share to traditional automobile companies with EV entrants, rather than the EV startups discussed above.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0918cc0a62c48586076b6fbceda928a7\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"399\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>Cox Automotive</p><p><b>Investor Takeaway</b></p><p>I discussed in my July 27, 2022, Seeking Alpha article entitled &#34;MOKE + EV Technology Group: The Cost And Value Of &#39;Brand Equity&#39; In The EV Automotive Value Chain&#34; that Brand Equity would be critical to growth of a startup. The advantages of Brand Equity, which gives a product competitive edge in the marketplace include:</p><ul><li>Developing a greater market share</li><li>Charging a price premium</li><li>Ease of Recognition</li><li>Differentiation from the competition</li></ul><p>Brand equity can be defined as the additional value that a recognizable brand name adds to a product offering, and is created as customers becoming increasingly and more personally aware of a brand and build a connection with it.</p><p>None of the EV startups detailed in Tables 1-3 are on the radar in sales in the U.S., Europe, and China. Indeed, the only competition for Tesla in the U.S. and Europe are established automobile companies with EV offerings. China is different with little competition coming from traditional non-Chinese automobile manufacturers with EV offerings, yet Tesla is still within the Top 10 of sales through June 2022.</p><p>In Chart 7, I show share price for the five EV companies (including TSLA) listed in Table 1, and show EPS for the past one-year period. Indeed, only Tesla has a positive EPS.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a3a40f40a1f17002fa2eb540525072ea\" tg-width=\"634\" tg-height=\"568\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>YCharts</p><p>Chart 7</p><p>The point of this article is to expand on my thesis in my previous article the importance of Brand Equity. Tesla has achieved Brand Equity, as I showed in that article. But without it, EV startups are struggling. The competition to Tesla outside China is coming from established automobile makers with EV offerings, not these startups.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Tesla: No Competitor Yet From EV Startups</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTesla: No Competitor Yet From EV Startups\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-08-06 11:51 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4530333-tesla-no-competitor-from-ev-startups?source=content_type%3Aall%7Cfirst_level_url%3Aportfolio%7Csection%3Aportfolio_content_unit%7Csection_asset%3Alatest%7Cline%3A12><strong>Seeking Alpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>SummaryAs the EV race heats up, EV startups that went public in the past year have average one-year returns of -56%, showing the need for \"brand equity.\"EV startups are in trouble as sales have been ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4530333-tesla-no-competitor-from-ev-startups?source=content_type%3Aall%7Cfirst_level_url%3Aportfolio%7Csection%3Aportfolio_content_unit%7Csection_asset%3Alatest%7Cline%3A12\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4530333-tesla-no-competitor-from-ev-startups?source=content_type%3Aall%7Cfirst_level_url%3Aportfolio%7Csection%3Aportfolio_content_unit%7Csection_asset%3Alatest%7Cline%3A12","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1169492962","content_text":"SummaryAs the EV race heats up, EV startups that went public in the past year have average one-year returns of -56%, showing the need for \"brand equity.\"EV startups are in trouble as sales have been minimal, venture money has dried up, and share prices have plummeted.Tesla is facing little competition from these EVs startups in the U.S. and Europe.Tesla's greatest challenge will come from traditional automotive companies with EV products.In an increasingly competitive business as incumbent automakers introduce their own EVs, startups are in trouble as sales have been minimal, venture money has dried up, and share prices have plummeted.I discussed in detail the lengths some of these startups have gone through to go public and get operating capital by forming Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (SPAC), which are shell companies that have no operations but go public with the intention of merging with or acquiring a company using the proceeds of the SPAC's IPO. I noted in my July 27, 2022, Seeking Alpha article entitled \"MOKE + EV Technology Group: The Cost And Value Of 'Brand Equity' In The EV Automotive Value Chain:\"\"SPACs contributed half of the $29 billion raised publicly by EV manufacturers, suppliers and charging firms in 2021. EV startups Nikola (NKLA), Lordstown Motors (RIDE), Canoo (GOEV), Faraday Future Intelligent Electric (FFIE), Fisker (FSR), and Lucid Group (LCID) all went public through SPAC deals over the last two years.\"SPACs go public at $10 per share, a price point that serves as a simple benchmark for how those stocks have been received. Of these SPAC companies, only the share price of Lucid Group is above its IPO price at $18.25, as shown in Chart 1.YChartsChart 1Is There a Doctor in the House?In Tables 1-3, I break down the current crop of EV startups by level of funding from all sources and compare each to Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA). Table 1 shows the first five ranked companies. I don't include Rivian Automotive (RIVN), which would top the list by accumulating $10.7 billion in funding. Rivian's shares are down 65.95% since the IPO in 11/21, and the company continues to struggle. Layoffs at Rivian started in late July 2022 as the company races to cut costs amid a challenging economic climate and pressure to increase production. It delivered 1,227 vehicles in the first quarter and reported 4,467 deliveries in Q2. Rivian is targeting production of 25,000 vehicles this year, half of its initial production guidance for 2022.Table 1 shows significant variations in financial metrics among the five companies. TSLA shows positive TTM revenue, Net Income, and Gross Profit. All the startups reported TTM Revenue, but only Li Auto (LI) reported a positive Net Income and Gross Profit.Lucid Group was the top fund raiser on this list. Lucid delivered 360 EVs, helping to account for $57.7 million in revenue in Q1 2022, but revised its 2022 production volume outlook to a range of 6K to 7K vehicles following the release of itsQ2 results. Guidance earlier in the year was for production volume of 12K to 14K vehicles.China's NIO (NIO) delivered 25,059 electric cars in Q2, which is slightly above the guidance of 23,000-25,000. So far this year, NIO globally sold 50,827 electric cars. But NIO reported a loss from operations was RMB2,445.1 million (US$383.7 million) in the fourth quarter of 2021, representing an increase of 162.5% from the fourth quarter of 2020 and an increase of 146.5% from the third quarter of 2021.Seeking AlphaChart 2 shows a similar story based on one-year share price percent change for the companies listed in Table 1. TSLA is the only company showing positive growth at 29.72% as of the close on July 29, 2022. LI share price was -1.65%. NIO share price is down 55.84% showing investors the COVID situation in China remains fluid and EV shares in general remain under a cloud amid rising interest rates and fears of a global recession.YChartsChart 2Table 2 shows TSLA compared with startups ranked #5-8 based on level of funding. Only Fisker reported TTM revenues of just $96,000. Wall Street was initially attracted to its asset-light business model based on contract manufacturing. However, declining investor appetite for pre-revenue companies has taken the focus away from companies like Fisker.That will change as the Fisker Ocean is set to start production in November 2022 and sold exclusively through the Fisker app. According to the company, reservations for the Ocean electric SUV surpassed 50,000, a significant rise from the 40,000 preorders announced in early April. The Ocean with the base Sport trim priced at $37,499 before incentives.Seeking AlphaChart 3 shows one-year share price percent change for the companies listed in Table 2. Again, TSLA is the only company showing positive growth at 29.72% as of the close on July 29, 2022. FSR share price is down 40.57%. The stock is trading below its IPO price.YChartsChart 3Table 3 shows the remaining EV startups, but funding has not been disclosed. Of the four startups, only Ayro (AYRO) showed positive TTM revenue of just $2.92M but net income was -$32.01M. Ayro has a different business model than the other companies included in this article as it designs and manufactures electric vehicles for closed campus mobility, urban and community transport, local on-demand and last mile delivery, and government use. The company provides four-wheeled purpose-built electric vehicles for universities, business and medical campuses, last mile delivery services, and food service providers.Seeking AlphaChart 4 shows one-year share price percent change for the companies listed in Table 3. Again, TSLA is the only company showing positive growth at 29.72% as of the close on July 29, 2022. All others have exhibited large negative double-digit share performance.YChartsChart 4Tesla's PerformanceTesla reported a mixed Q2 earnings report on in its Q2 earnings call on July 20, 2022. Adjusted earnings per share came in at $2.27 vs. $1.81 expected. Revenue missed at $16.93 billion vs. $17.1 billion expected. Chart 5 shows quarterly performance through Q2 2022.YChartsChart 5In Q2 2022, TSLA achieved record production rates across the company, producing more than 258,000 vehicles and delivered 254,695 vehicles. That was below consensus estimates of 266,795 vehicles, and down from 310,048 in 1Q 2022, as the company faced a continuation of manufacturing challenges related to shutdowns, global supply chain disruptions, labor shortages and logistics and other complications, which limited its ability to consistently run our factories at full capacity.While the Shanghai factory was shut down fully and then partially for the majority of Q2, TSLA ended the quarter with a record monthly production level. Recent equipment upgrades will enable the company to continue to increase its production rate further.The Fremont Factory made a record number of vehicles in Q2. I see opportunities for further production rate improvements. The next generation of 4680 battery cell machinery has been installed in Texas and is in the process of commissioning. Factory output in Texas continues to grow.Gigafactory Berlin-Brandenburg reached an important milestone of over 1,000 cars produced in a single week while achieving positive gross margin during the quarter. Tesla expect the production rate to continue improving through the rest of the year.Table 4 shows U.S. EV shipments for Q2 2021 and Q2 2022 by model. In Q2, Tesla was the top-selling luxury brand in the U.S., outpacing all the established names: Audi, BMW, Cadillac, Lexus, Mercedes-Benz, as seen in Table 4.EV sales as a percentage of total automobile sales. In Q2, EV sales accounted for 5.6% of the total market, an increase from 5.3% in Q1. EV share in Q2 2021 was 2.7%. In Q2 2021, there were 19 EV models for sale in the U.S. One year later, the number jumped to 33.Table 4 - Source: Cox AutomotiveCox AutomotiveHowever, as new EV models continue to enter the market, Tesla's share of the EV segment is dropping. Last quarter, it fell to 66.1%, down from 74.6% in Q1 2022, as shown in Table 5. Tesla shipments by model are also shown. Importantly, Tesla is losing market share to traditional automobile companies with EV entrants, rather than the EV startups discussed above.Cox AutomotiveInvestor TakeawayI discussed in my July 27, 2022, Seeking Alpha article entitled \"MOKE + EV Technology Group: The Cost And Value Of 'Brand Equity' In The EV Automotive Value Chain\" that Brand Equity would be critical to growth of a startup. The advantages of Brand Equity, which gives a product competitive edge in the marketplace include:Developing a greater market shareCharging a price premiumEase of RecognitionDifferentiation from the competitionBrand equity can be defined as the additional value that a recognizable brand name adds to a product offering, and is created as customers becoming increasingly and more personally aware of a brand and build a connection with it.None of the EV startups detailed in Tables 1-3 are on the radar in sales in the U.S., Europe, and China. Indeed, the only competition for Tesla in the U.S. and Europe are established automobile companies with EV offerings. China is different with little competition coming from traditional non-Chinese automobile manufacturers with EV offerings, yet Tesla is still within the Top 10 of sales through June 2022.In Chart 7, I show share price for the five EV companies (including TSLA) listed in Table 1, and show EPS for the past one-year period. Indeed, only Tesla has a positive EPS.YChartsChart 7The point of this article is to expand on my thesis in my previous article the importance of Brand Equity. Tesla has achieved Brand Equity, as I showed in that article. But without it, EV startups are struggling. The competition to Tesla outside China is coming from established automobile makers with EV offerings, not these startups.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":15,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":803583778,"gmtCreate":1627448201094,"gmtModify":1703490174148,"author":{"id":"3574915362300502","authorId":"3574915362300502","name":"Thunderbird","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/86528f4fb847fbbf69680f5b0c603119","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3574915362300502","idStr":"3574915362300502"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Today is the day. Wait for it guys!","listText":"Today is the day. Wait for it guys!","text":"Today is the day. Wait for it guys!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":8,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/803583778","repostId":"2154991792","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2154991792","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1627428087,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2154991792?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-28 07:21","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Wall St snaps five-day up streak as caution rises before tech earnings, Fed","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2154991792","media":"Reuters","summary":"NEW YORK, July 27 (Reuters) - U.S. stocks fell on Tuesday, ending a five-day winning streak in the t","content":"<p>NEW YORK, July 27 (Reuters) - U.S. stocks fell on Tuesday, ending a five-day winning streak in the three major indexes, as investors were cautious before results from top tech and internet names and Wednesday's Federal Reserve announcement.</p>\n<p>The Nasdaq led the day's declines, registering its biggest daily percentage drop since May 12, but the three indexes pared losses heading into the close and ended well off the lows of the session.</p>\n<p>Shares of Apple Inc, Microsoft Corp&nbsp;and Google parent Alphabet Inc , which all reported earnings after the bell, dropped and weighed the most on the Nasdaq and S&amp;P 500 along with Amazon.com Inc , which is expected to report results later this week.</p>\n<p>Also, electric-car maker Tesla Inc fell 2%, a day after it posted a bigger-than-expected second-quarter profit but said a global chip shortage that led to temporary factory shutdowns for the automaker remains serious.</p>\n<p>Shares of the heavily weighted tech and internet companies have run up recently and last week regained leadership in the market, putting their results even more in the spotlight.</p>\n<p>\"Expectations are so high. They're going to have good numbers ... but we are expecting much more or maybe they will talk down the second half of the year,\" said Paul Nolte, portfolio manager at Kingsview Investment Management in Chicago.</p>\n<p>Adding to the cautious tone is the outlook for U.S.-listed Chinese stocks, he said. The shares including Baidu extended losses as fears over more regulations in the mainland persisted.</p>\n<p>\"There's a fair amount of (U.S.) investors in those companies,\" Nolte said.</p>\n<p>Uncertainty also rose as the Fed began its two-day meeting, with investors looking for signs on when it intends to begin reining in its massive stimulus program.</p>\n<p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average&nbsp;fell 85.79 points, or 0.24%, to 35,058.52, the S&amp;P 500&nbsp;lost 20.84 points, or 0.47%, to 4,401.46 and the Nasdaq Composite &nbsp;dropped 180.14 points, or 1.21%, to 14,660.58.</p>\n<p>Helping to support the Dow, shares of McDonald's Corp&nbsp;rose 1% ahead of its results due before the bell on Wednesday.</p>\n<p>In another sign that investors were in a risk-off mood, defensive sectors such as real estate&nbsp;and utilities&nbsp;were the two best-performing S&amp;P 500 categories for the day, and U.S. Treasuries prices rose.</p>\n<p>Intel Corp&nbsp;shares dropped 2.1% after it said its factories would start building Qualcomm chips and laid out a road map to expand its new foundry business.</p>\n<p>Volume on U.S. exchanges was 10.36 billion shares, compared with the 9.86 billion average for the full session over the last 20 trading days.</p>\n<p>Declining issues outnumbered advancing ones on the NYSE by a 1.87-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 2.65-to-1 ratio favored decliners.</p>\n<p>The S&amp;P 500 posted 44 new 52-week highs and no new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 39 new highs and 235 new lows.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Wall St snaps five-day up streak as caution rises before tech earnings, Fed</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWall St snaps five-day up streak as caution rises before tech earnings, Fed\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-07-28 07:21</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>NEW YORK, July 27 (Reuters) - U.S. stocks fell on Tuesday, ending a five-day winning streak in the three major indexes, as investors were cautious before results from top tech and internet names and Wednesday's Federal Reserve announcement.</p>\n<p>The Nasdaq led the day's declines, registering its biggest daily percentage drop since May 12, but the three indexes pared losses heading into the close and ended well off the lows of the session.</p>\n<p>Shares of Apple Inc, Microsoft Corp&nbsp;and Google parent Alphabet Inc , which all reported earnings after the bell, dropped and weighed the most on the Nasdaq and S&amp;P 500 along with Amazon.com Inc , which is expected to report results later this week.</p>\n<p>Also, electric-car maker Tesla Inc fell 2%, a day after it posted a bigger-than-expected second-quarter profit but said a global chip shortage that led to temporary factory shutdowns for the automaker remains serious.</p>\n<p>Shares of the heavily weighted tech and internet companies have run up recently and last week regained leadership in the market, putting their results even more in the spotlight.</p>\n<p>\"Expectations are so high. They're going to have good numbers ... but we are expecting much more or maybe they will talk down the second half of the year,\" said Paul Nolte, portfolio manager at Kingsview Investment Management in Chicago.</p>\n<p>Adding to the cautious tone is the outlook for U.S.-listed Chinese stocks, he said. The shares including Baidu extended losses as fears over more regulations in the mainland persisted.</p>\n<p>\"There's a fair amount of (U.S.) investors in those companies,\" Nolte said.</p>\n<p>Uncertainty also rose as the Fed began its two-day meeting, with investors looking for signs on when it intends to begin reining in its massive stimulus program.</p>\n<p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average&nbsp;fell 85.79 points, or 0.24%, to 35,058.52, the S&amp;P 500&nbsp;lost 20.84 points, or 0.47%, to 4,401.46 and the Nasdaq Composite &nbsp;dropped 180.14 points, or 1.21%, to 14,660.58.</p>\n<p>Helping to support the Dow, shares of McDonald's Corp&nbsp;rose 1% ahead of its results due before the bell on Wednesday.</p>\n<p>In another sign that investors were in a risk-off mood, defensive sectors such as real estate&nbsp;and utilities&nbsp;were the two best-performing S&amp;P 500 categories for the day, and U.S. Treasuries prices rose.</p>\n<p>Intel Corp&nbsp;shares dropped 2.1% after it said its factories would start building Qualcomm chips and laid out a road map to expand its new foundry business.</p>\n<p>Volume on U.S. exchanges was 10.36 billion shares, compared with the 9.86 billion average for the full session over the last 20 trading days.</p>\n<p>Declining issues outnumbered advancing ones on the NYSE by a 1.87-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 2.65-to-1 ratio favored decliners.</p>\n<p>The S&amp;P 500 posted 44 new 52-week highs and no new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 39 new highs and 235 new lows.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2154991792","content_text":"NEW YORK, July 27 (Reuters) - U.S. stocks fell on Tuesday, ending a five-day winning streak in the three major indexes, as investors were cautious before results from top tech and internet names and Wednesday's Federal Reserve announcement.\nThe Nasdaq led the day's declines, registering its biggest daily percentage drop since May 12, but the three indexes pared losses heading into the close and ended well off the lows of the session.\nShares of Apple Inc, Microsoft Corp and Google parent Alphabet Inc , which all reported earnings after the bell, dropped and weighed the most on the Nasdaq and S&P 500 along with Amazon.com Inc , which is expected to report results later this week.\nAlso, electric-car maker Tesla Inc fell 2%, a day after it posted a bigger-than-expected second-quarter profit but said a global chip shortage that led to temporary factory shutdowns for the automaker remains serious.\nShares of the heavily weighted tech and internet companies have run up recently and last week regained leadership in the market, putting their results even more in the spotlight.\n\"Expectations are so high. They're going to have good numbers ... but we are expecting much more or maybe they will talk down the second half of the year,\" said Paul Nolte, portfolio manager at Kingsview Investment Management in Chicago.\nAdding to the cautious tone is the outlook for U.S.-listed Chinese stocks, he said. The shares including Baidu extended losses as fears over more regulations in the mainland persisted.\n\"There's a fair amount of (U.S.) investors in those companies,\" Nolte said.\nUncertainty also rose as the Fed began its two-day meeting, with investors looking for signs on when it intends to begin reining in its massive stimulus program.\nThe Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 85.79 points, or 0.24%, to 35,058.52, the S&P 500 lost 20.84 points, or 0.47%, to 4,401.46 and the Nasdaq Composite  dropped 180.14 points, or 1.21%, to 14,660.58.\nHelping to support the Dow, shares of McDonald's Corp rose 1% ahead of its results due before the bell on Wednesday.\nIn another sign that investors were in a risk-off mood, defensive sectors such as real estate and utilities were the two best-performing S&P 500 categories for the day, and U.S. Treasuries prices rose.\nIntel Corp shares dropped 2.1% after it said its factories would start building Qualcomm chips and laid out a road map to expand its new foundry business.\nVolume on U.S. exchanges was 10.36 billion shares, compared with the 9.86 billion average for the full session over the last 20 trading days.\nDeclining issues outnumbered advancing ones on the NYSE by a 1.87-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 2.65-to-1 ratio favored decliners.\nThe S&P 500 posted 44 new 52-week highs and no new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 39 new highs and 235 new lows.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":125,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9935356913,"gmtCreate":1663035798233,"gmtModify":1676537188415,"author":{"id":"3574915362300502","authorId":"3574915362300502","name":"Thunderbird","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/86528f4fb847fbbf69680f5b0c603119","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3574915362300502","idStr":"3574915362300502"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"That we know. We are more concern if the cpi is above or below 8.1%. Anyone can tell me?","listText":"That we know. We are more concern if the cpi is above or below 8.1%. Anyone can tell me?","text":"That we know. We are more concern if the cpi is above or below 8.1%. Anyone can tell me?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9935356913","repostId":"1154864878","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1154864878","pubTimestamp":1663029586,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1154864878?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-09-13 08:39","market":"us","language":"en","title":"US Inflation Data Will Determine If Stock Rally Continues","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1154864878","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"S&P 500 to face another bout of turbulence if history repeatsKey technical level for the index is 200-day moving averageThe S&P 500 Index is on a roll, posting its best four-day rally since early July","content":"<html><head></head><body><ul><li>S&amp;P 500 to face another bout of turbulence if history repeats</li><li>Key technical level for the index is 200-day moving average</li></ul><p>The S&amp;P 500 Index is on a roll, posting its best four-day rally since early July partly on the back of hopes that inflation data due Tuesday morning will show some cooling off ahead of next week’s Federal Reserve meeting.</p><p>The index just snapped three weeks of losses and is now bouncing around 4,110 points, within sight of its 200-day moving average around 4,270. Failure to break -- and then stay -- above the key technical support level in the aftermath of the inflation report may indicate the market is poised for another leg lower.</p><p>That’s what happened last month.</p><p>After CPI data on Aug. 10 showed US inflation decelerated by more than expected, the S&amp;P 500 briefly surged to within a hair of its 200-day moving average. But the index then lost steam, failing to recapture that threshold and coming under pressure after a fast rise in Treasury yields rattled growth shares and upended the stock market’s $7 trillion early summer rebound.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/dbcc040a3e06f2f1d0c5c94b31e8749d\" tg-width=\"698\" tg-height=\"392\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>The difference this time is that investor positioning is already depressed, which is a contrarian sign, according to Keith Lerner, co-chief investment officer at Truist Advisory Services. “This suggests at least some investors are already braced for bad news and will not need to take aggressive selling action since they are already somewhat hedged,” he wrote in a note to clients.</p><p>Meanwhile, US consumer-price inflation is expected to show signs of moderating in August, with CPI forecast to have risen 8% in August from a year earlier versus 8.5% in July, according to economists surveyed by Bloomberg. Another rally could help propel the index above its 200-day moving average for the first time since April.</p><p>If the index can’t break above that, it would be a sign that a counter-trend rally has been unfolding, and the market is poised for another leg lower as the index faces resistance from 4,200 to 4,300, according to Lerner.</p><p>Still, major US equity benchmarks have shown some resiliency recently, with the S&amp;P 500 topping its 50-day and 100-day moving averages. A close above its 200-day moving average would be viewed as a potential bullish change in the market’s long-term trend.</p><p>“We expect the markets to remain in choppy waters,” Lerner added. “However, markets do not typically move in a straight line. On a short-term basis, several indicators suggest the selling is getting overdone.”</p></body></html>","source":"lsy1584095487587","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>US Inflation Data Will Determine If Stock Rally Continues</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nUS Inflation Data Will Determine If Stock Rally Continues\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-09-13 08:39 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-09-12/stocks-are-on-a-roll-inflation-data-determines-if-it-continues?srnd=premium><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>S&P 500 to face another bout of turbulence if history repeatsKey technical level for the index is 200-day moving averageThe S&P 500 Index is on a roll, posting its best four-day rally since early July...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-09-12/stocks-are-on-a-roll-inflation-data-determines-if-it-continues?srnd=premium\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-09-12/stocks-are-on-a-roll-inflation-data-determines-if-it-continues?srnd=premium","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1154864878","content_text":"S&P 500 to face another bout of turbulence if history repeatsKey technical level for the index is 200-day moving averageThe S&P 500 Index is on a roll, posting its best four-day rally since early July partly on the back of hopes that inflation data due Tuesday morning will show some cooling off ahead of next week’s Federal Reserve meeting.The index just snapped three weeks of losses and is now bouncing around 4,110 points, within sight of its 200-day moving average around 4,270. Failure to break -- and then stay -- above the key technical support level in the aftermath of the inflation report may indicate the market is poised for another leg lower.That’s what happened last month.After CPI data on Aug. 10 showed US inflation decelerated by more than expected, the S&P 500 briefly surged to within a hair of its 200-day moving average. But the index then lost steam, failing to recapture that threshold and coming under pressure after a fast rise in Treasury yields rattled growth shares and upended the stock market’s $7 trillion early summer rebound.The difference this time is that investor positioning is already depressed, which is a contrarian sign, according to Keith Lerner, co-chief investment officer at Truist Advisory Services. “This suggests at least some investors are already braced for bad news and will not need to take aggressive selling action since they are already somewhat hedged,” he wrote in a note to clients.Meanwhile, US consumer-price inflation is expected to show signs of moderating in August, with CPI forecast to have risen 8% in August from a year earlier versus 8.5% in July, according to economists surveyed by Bloomberg. Another rally could help propel the index above its 200-day moving average for the first time since April.If the index can’t break above that, it would be a sign that a counter-trend rally has been unfolding, and the market is poised for another leg lower as the index faces resistance from 4,200 to 4,300, according to Lerner.Still, major US equity benchmarks have shown some resiliency recently, with the S&P 500 topping its 50-day and 100-day moving averages. A close above its 200-day moving average would be viewed as a potential bullish change in the market’s long-term trend.“We expect the markets to remain in choppy waters,” Lerner added. “However, markets do not typically move in a straight line. On a short-term basis, several indicators suggest the selling is getting overdone.”","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":515,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9901803284,"gmtCreate":1659153511349,"gmtModify":1676536266490,"author":{"id":"3574915362300502","authorId":"3574915362300502","name":"Thunderbird","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/86528f4fb847fbbf69680f5b0c603119","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3574915362300502","idStr":"3574915362300502"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Is the gain sustainable Or dead cat bounce?&nbsp;","listText":"Is the gain sustainable Or dead cat bounce?&nbsp;","text":"Is the gain sustainable Or dead cat bounce?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9901803284","repostId":"2255943595","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2255943595","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1659135413,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2255943595?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-07-30 06:56","market":"us","language":"en","title":"S&P 500, Nasdaq Register Biggest Monthly Gains Since 2020","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2255943595","media":"Reuters","summary":"* Apple sees continued strength in demand for iPhone* Amazon expects higher revenue in third quarter","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>* Apple sees continued strength in demand for iPhone</p><p>* Amazon expects higher revenue in third quarter</p><p>* Intel cuts annual forecasts, shares slide</p><p>* Oil giants Exxon, Chevron jump after record revenue</p><p>* Indexes: Dow up 1%, S&amp;P 500 up 1.4%, Nasdaq up 1.9%</p><p>NEW YORK, July 29 (Reuters) - U.S. stocks added to their recent rally on Friday after upbeat forecasts from Apple and Amazon.com, and the S&amp;P 500 and Nasdaq posted their biggest monthly percentage gains since 2020.</p><p>Most S&amp;P 500 sectors ended higher, with energy rising 4.5%, the most of any S&amp;P sector. Chevron Corp rose 8.9% and Exxon Mobil shares jumped 4.6% after the companies reported record quarterly revenues.</p><p>Apple Inc shares gained 3.3% after the company said parts shortages were easing and that demand for iPhones was continuing. Amazon.com Inc shot up 10.4% after it forecast a jump in third-quarter revenue from bigger fees from its Prime loyalty subscriptions.</p><p>&#34;In today&#39;s market, the Amazon and Apple numbers are giving the market support (on) the idea that two large companies that are a large part of the S&amp;P seem so far to be able to navigate through these tougher times,&#34; said Rick Meckler, partner at Cherry Lane Investments, a family investment office in New Vernon, New Jersey.</p><p>Stocks have also rallied this week on investor speculation that the Federal Reserve may not need to be as aggressive with interest rate hikes as some had feared.</p><p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 315.5 points, or 0.97%, to 32,845.13; the S&amp;P 500 gained 57.86 points, or 1.42%, to 4,130.29 and the Nasdaq Composite added 228.10 points, or 1.88%, to 12,390.69.</p><p>All three major indexes gained for the month and for the week. The S&amp;P 500 gained about 9.1% for July in its biggest monthly percentage gain since November 2020, while the Nasdaq jumped about 12.3% in July in its biggest monthly gain since April 2020.</p><p>In other earnings, Intel Corp shares fell 8.6% after the company cut annual sales and profit forecasts and missed second-quarter estimates.</p><p>Second-quarter U.S. corporate results have mostly been stronger than expected.</p><p>Of the 279 S&amp;P 500 companies that have reported earnings so far, 77.8% have exceeded expectations. Earnings for S&amp;P 500 companies now are expected to have increased 7.1% in the quarter versus an estimated 5.6% at the start of July, according to IBES data from Refinitiv.</p><p>The day&#39;s economic data showed U.S. labor costs increased strongly in the second quarter as a tight jobs market boosted wage growth.</p><p>But on Thursday, a government report showed the American economy unexpectedly contracted in the second quarter, suggesting to some investors that the economy was on the cusp of a recession. They said it might deter the Fed from continuing to aggressively increase rates as it battles high inflation.</p><p>Volume on U.S. exchanges was 11.35 billion shares, compared with the 10.79 billion-share average for the full session over the last 20 trading days.</p><p>Advancing issues outnumbered declining ones on the NYSE by a 2.92-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 1.44-to-1 ratio favored advancers.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 posted three new 52-week highs and 33 new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 63 new highs and 82 new lows.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>S&P 500, Nasdaq Register Biggest Monthly Gains Since 2020</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nS&P 500, Nasdaq Register Biggest Monthly Gains Since 2020\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-07-30 06:56</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>* Apple sees continued strength in demand for iPhone</p><p>* Amazon expects higher revenue in third quarter</p><p>* Intel cuts annual forecasts, shares slide</p><p>* Oil giants Exxon, Chevron jump after record revenue</p><p>* Indexes: Dow up 1%, S&amp;P 500 up 1.4%, Nasdaq up 1.9%</p><p>NEW YORK, July 29 (Reuters) - U.S. stocks added to their recent rally on Friday after upbeat forecasts from Apple and Amazon.com, and the S&amp;P 500 and Nasdaq posted their biggest monthly percentage gains since 2020.</p><p>Most S&amp;P 500 sectors ended higher, with energy rising 4.5%, the most of any S&amp;P sector. Chevron Corp rose 8.9% and Exxon Mobil shares jumped 4.6% after the companies reported record quarterly revenues.</p><p>Apple Inc shares gained 3.3% after the company said parts shortages were easing and that demand for iPhones was continuing. Amazon.com Inc shot up 10.4% after it forecast a jump in third-quarter revenue from bigger fees from its Prime loyalty subscriptions.</p><p>&#34;In today&#39;s market, the Amazon and Apple numbers are giving the market support (on) the idea that two large companies that are a large part of the S&amp;P seem so far to be able to navigate through these tougher times,&#34; said Rick Meckler, partner at Cherry Lane Investments, a family investment office in New Vernon, New Jersey.</p><p>Stocks have also rallied this week on investor speculation that the Federal Reserve may not need to be as aggressive with interest rate hikes as some had feared.</p><p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 315.5 points, or 0.97%, to 32,845.13; the S&amp;P 500 gained 57.86 points, or 1.42%, to 4,130.29 and the Nasdaq Composite added 228.10 points, or 1.88%, to 12,390.69.</p><p>All three major indexes gained for the month and for the week. The S&amp;P 500 gained about 9.1% for July in its biggest monthly percentage gain since November 2020, while the Nasdaq jumped about 12.3% in July in its biggest monthly gain since April 2020.</p><p>In other earnings, Intel Corp shares fell 8.6% after the company cut annual sales and profit forecasts and missed second-quarter estimates.</p><p>Second-quarter U.S. corporate results have mostly been stronger than expected.</p><p>Of the 279 S&amp;P 500 companies that have reported earnings so far, 77.8% have exceeded expectations. Earnings for S&amp;P 500 companies now are expected to have increased 7.1% in the quarter versus an estimated 5.6% at the start of July, according to IBES data from Refinitiv.</p><p>The day&#39;s economic data showed U.S. labor costs increased strongly in the second quarter as a tight jobs market boosted wage growth.</p><p>But on Thursday, a government report showed the American economy unexpectedly contracted in the second quarter, suggesting to some investors that the economy was on the cusp of a recession. They said it might deter the Fed from continuing to aggressively increase rates as it battles high inflation.</p><p>Volume on U.S. exchanges was 11.35 billion shares, compared with the 10.79 billion-share average for the full session over the last 20 trading days.</p><p>Advancing issues outnumbered declining ones on the NYSE by a 2.92-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 1.44-to-1 ratio favored advancers.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 posted three new 52-week highs and 33 new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 63 new highs and 82 new lows.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SSO":"两倍做多标普500ETF","SH":"标普500反向ETF","BK4581":"高盛持仓","AMZN":"亚马逊","SPXU":"三倍做空标普500ETF","CVX":"雪佛龙","OEF":"标普100指数ETF-iShares","SPY":"标普500ETF","AAPL":"苹果","INTC":"英特尔",".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite","SDS":"两倍做空标普500ETF",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","UPRO":"三倍做多标普500ETF","XOM":"埃克森美孚","OEX":"标普100","BK4559":"巴菲特持仓","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓","IVV":"标普500指数ETF"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2255943595","content_text":"* Apple sees continued strength in demand for iPhone* Amazon expects higher revenue in third quarter* Intel cuts annual forecasts, shares slide* Oil giants Exxon, Chevron jump after record revenue* Indexes: Dow up 1%, S&P 500 up 1.4%, Nasdaq up 1.9%NEW YORK, July 29 (Reuters) - U.S. stocks added to their recent rally on Friday after upbeat forecasts from Apple and Amazon.com, and the S&P 500 and Nasdaq posted their biggest monthly percentage gains since 2020.Most S&P 500 sectors ended higher, with energy rising 4.5%, the most of any S&P sector. Chevron Corp rose 8.9% and Exxon Mobil shares jumped 4.6% after the companies reported record quarterly revenues.Apple Inc shares gained 3.3% after the company said parts shortages were easing and that demand for iPhones was continuing. Amazon.com Inc shot up 10.4% after it forecast a jump in third-quarter revenue from bigger fees from its Prime loyalty subscriptions.\"In today's market, the Amazon and Apple numbers are giving the market support (on) the idea that two large companies that are a large part of the S&P seem so far to be able to navigate through these tougher times,\" said Rick Meckler, partner at Cherry Lane Investments, a family investment office in New Vernon, New Jersey.Stocks have also rallied this week on investor speculation that the Federal Reserve may not need to be as aggressive with interest rate hikes as some had feared.The Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 315.5 points, or 0.97%, to 32,845.13; the S&P 500 gained 57.86 points, or 1.42%, to 4,130.29 and the Nasdaq Composite added 228.10 points, or 1.88%, to 12,390.69.All three major indexes gained for the month and for the week. The S&P 500 gained about 9.1% for July in its biggest monthly percentage gain since November 2020, while the Nasdaq jumped about 12.3% in July in its biggest monthly gain since April 2020.In other earnings, Intel Corp shares fell 8.6% after the company cut annual sales and profit forecasts and missed second-quarter estimates.Second-quarter U.S. corporate results have mostly been stronger than expected.Of the 279 S&P 500 companies that have reported earnings so far, 77.8% have exceeded expectations. Earnings for S&P 500 companies now are expected to have increased 7.1% in the quarter versus an estimated 5.6% at the start of July, according to IBES data from Refinitiv.The day's economic data showed U.S. labor costs increased strongly in the second quarter as a tight jobs market boosted wage growth.But on Thursday, a government report showed the American economy unexpectedly contracted in the second quarter, suggesting to some investors that the economy was on the cusp of a recession. They said it might deter the Fed from continuing to aggressively increase rates as it battles high inflation.Volume on U.S. exchanges was 11.35 billion shares, compared with the 10.79 billion-share average for the full session over the last 20 trading days.Advancing issues outnumbered declining ones on the NYSE by a 2.92-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 1.44-to-1 ratio favored advancers.The S&P 500 posted three new 52-week highs and 33 new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 63 new highs and 82 new lows.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":67,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":805763131,"gmtCreate":1627907594923,"gmtModify":1703497607022,"author":{"id":"3574915362300502","authorId":"3574915362300502","name":"Thunderbird","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/86528f4fb847fbbf69680f5b0c603119","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3574915362300502","idStr":"3574915362300502"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Let’s pray for a good trading week ahead!","listText":"Let’s pray for a good trading week ahead!","text":"Let’s pray for a good trading week ahead!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/805763131","repostId":"1191057621","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1191057621","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1627905199,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1191057621?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-08-02 19:53","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Toplines Before US Market Open on Monday","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1191057621","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Futures rise amid earnings optimism; Dollar dips.\nSquare, Moderna, First Solar and more made the big","content":"<ul>\n <li>Futures rise amid earnings optimism; Dollar dips.</li>\n <li>Square, Moderna, First Solar and more made the biggest moves in the premarket.</li>\n <li>Treasuries steady; crude oil declines on China outlook.</li>\n</ul>\n<p>(August&nbsp;2)&nbsp;U.S. index futures gained along with European stocks as upbeat earnings and a surge in corporatedealmakinglifted sentiment, offsetting lingering concerns over China’s regulatory crackdown and the spread of the delta virus variant.</p>\n<p>U.S. S&amp;P 500 E-minis were up 19.5 points, or 0.44%, at 07:52 a.m. ET. Dow E-minis gained 118 points, or 0.34%, while Nasdaq 100 E-minis rose 66.75 points, or 0.45%.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ffb408f47638770562209367ca7ab1f1\" tg-width=\"1242\" tg-height=\"517\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p><b>Stocks making the biggest moves in the premarket:</b></p>\n<p><b>1)&nbsp;Square(SQ)</b> – The digital payments company agreed to buy Australia’s Afterpayfor about $29 billion in stock, representing a roughly 30% premium for Afterpay shareholders. Square shares fell 4.8% in the premarket, but news of the deal boosted shares of U.S.-based payment companyAffirm(AFRM) by 8.2%.</p>\n<p><b>2)&nbsp;Zoom Video(ZM) </b>– The video conferencing companyagreed to pay $85 millionto settle a lawsuit accusing it violated the privacy rights of users. It also agreed to beef up its security practices to prevent so-called “Zoombombing,” where hackers disrupted Zoom meetings.</p>\n<p><b>3)&nbsp;General Electric(GE)</b> – GE has completed its previously announced one-for-eight reverse stock split and will begin trading on a post-split basis today.</p>\n<p><b>4)&nbsp;Moderna(MRNA),Pfizer(PFE),BioNTech(BNTX)</b> – Moderna and Pfizer both raised prices for their Covid-19 vaccines in their latest supply contracts, according to the Financial Times. Additionally, The Wall Street Journal reported that the Food and Drug Administration is under pressure to give both vaccines full approval and that this could happen within the next month for Pfizer and partner BioNTech. Moderna rose 2.5% in the premarket, Pfizer gained 1%, while BioNTech surged 5.1%.</p>\n<p><b>5)&nbsp;Foot Locker(FL)</b> – The athletic footwear and apparel retailer announced a deal to buy California-based shoe store chain WSS for $750 million and Japan-based streetwear brand Atmos for $360 million.</p>\n<p><b>6)&nbsp;Uber Technologies(UBER)</b> – Shares of Uber gained 1.1% in premarket trading after Gordon Haskett Research Advisors initiated coverage with a “buy” rating. Haskett called Uber a company that is continually engraining itself in the everyday lives of consumers through its ride-hailing and food delivery services.</p>\n<p><b>7)&nbsp;Capri Holdings(CPRI)</b> – Capri rose 1.2% in the premarket following an upgrade to “buy” from “neutral” at MKM Partners, which noted a string of better than expected quarters for the company behind brands like Michael Kors and Versace. MKM also cited an overall improvement in the luxury goods sector.</p>\n<p><b>8)&nbsp;Discovery(DISCA)</b> – Discovery is in informal talks about a potential bid for British state-owned broadcaster Channel 4, according to Britain’s Telegraph newspaper.</p>\n<p><b>9)&nbsp;Robinhood(HOOD)</b> – More than 300,000 users of the stock trading app bought shares in Robinhood’s initial public offering last week, according to The Wall Street Journal. That represents about 1.3% of the company’s funded account base. Robinhood added 1.5% in premarket trading.</p>\n<p><b>10)&nbsp;Parker-Hannifin(PH)</b> – The maker of motion control technology and other industrial products is buying British rival Meggitt for about $8.8 billion in cash. Parker-Hannifin shares fell 2.2% in premarket action.</p>\n<p><b>11)&nbsp;Li Auto(LI)</b> – The China-based electric vehicle maker delivered 8,589 vehicles in July, an increase of 125% compared to July 2020. Li’s U.S.-based shares surged 4.3% in the premarket.</p>\n<p><b>12)&nbsp;First Solar(FSLR)</b> – The solar power systems maker’s shares gained 2.9% in premarket trading after Susquehanna Financial upgraded the stock to “positive” from “neutral,” based on upbeat management comments on solar module demand and pricing.</p>\n<p><b>In FX,</b>a relatively sedate start to the new week and month, but the Dollar has lost some recovery momentum and is moderately softer vs high beta and cyclical counterparts amidst a general improvement in risk sentiment. Hence, the index slipped back beneath 92.000 within a 92.174-91.962 band before finding a base and awaiting the final US Markit manufacturing PMI, construction spending and ISM in particular for the survey breakdown and first jobs proxy for Friday’s NFP.</p>\n<ul>\n <li>AUD/NZD/EUR/GBP - The Aussie and Kiwi have both regained some composure to pare overnight losses incurred on the back of further COVID restrictions, a Chinese manufacturing PMI miss, technical and cross-related factors. However, Aud/Usd remains heavy above 0.7350 and unlikely to trouble hefty option expiry interest at the 0.7400 strike (1.2 bn) ahead of the RBA tomorrow given expectations that the ongoing pandemic outbreaks could well force the Bank to backtrack on QE tapering plans. Meanwhile, Nzd/Usd is still rotating around the 21 DMA that comes in at 0.6979 today having failed to retain grasp of the 0.7000 handle, and the Euro is back below 1.1900 where 1.4 bn option expiries reside in wake of broadly softer than expected Eurozone manufacturing PMIs, bar Germany’s upgrade. Conversely, Cable is back over 1.3900 and Eur/Gbp is holding under 0.8550 following an unrevised final UK manufacturing PMI in advance of Thursday’s BoE.</li>\n <li>CAD/JPY/CHF - All very narrowly divergent vs the Greenback, and the Loonie holding up well in the face of weakness in WTI crude circa 1.2470, while the Yen is meandering from 109.60-77 in the run up to Tokyo inflation data on Tuesday and the Franc is straddling 0.9055 after in line Swiss CPI, a slowdown in retail sales vs pick up in the manufacturing PMI and weekly sight deposits showing just a small rise on domestic bank balances.</li>\n <li>SCANDI/EM - Contrasting manufacturing PMIs from Sweden and Norway, as the former dipped and latter gathered pace, but the Sek is straddling 10.2100 against the Eur with assistance from the aforementioned pick-up in overall risk appetite, while the Nok wanes within a 10.4910-10.4530 range due to a pull-back in Brent prices from Usd 75+/brl towards Usd 74.00.</li>\n</ul>\n<p><b>In commodities,</b>WTI and Brent have commenced the week on the backfoot, with the benchmarks lower by USD 1.00/bbl on the session. Such pressure comes in spite of the generally modestly constructive risk tone in a quiet European session with final PMIs not moving the dial much; with attention more on the weeks macro themes as outlined above. In crude specifics, updates have been very sparse throughout the session and as such the complex is more focus on COVID-19 related dynamics. With the demand-side of the equation torn between the ongoing case increases in Tokyo, among other areas, but on the flip-side supported by a push from top UK Cabinet Officials for an easing of travel restrictions and more broadly as NIH’s Fauci now does not believe the US is likely to return to lockdowns. Elsewhere, attention is on the geopolitical front and specifically last week’s attack on a ship off the Oman coast on which the US Secretary of State is confident that Iran is behind this attack. Moving to metals, spot gold and silver are modestly pressured with not too much read across from a choppy USD as we stand and likely on the back of the aforementioned broader risk tone; for reference, the yellow metal still holds the USD 1800/oz mark. Separately, much of the mornings focus is on copper where BHPs Escondida, Chile facility is facing strike action after the union rejected BHPs final labour offer. As such, Government-mediated discussions will last for 5-10 days and if the status quo is maintained and there is no breakthrough then strike action will formally commence. Given the uncertainty, LME Copper is supported on the session albeit still well off the pivotal USD 10k/t mark vs the current high USD 9799/t.</p>\n<p><b>US Event Calendar</b></p>\n<ul>\n <li>9:45am: July Markit US Manufacturing PMI, est. 63.1, prior 63.1</li>\n <li>10am: June Construction Spending MoM, est. 0.5%, prior -0.3%</li>\n <li>10am: July ISM Manufacturing, est. 60.9, prior 60.6</li>\n</ul>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Toplines Before US Market Open on Monday</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nToplines Before US Market Open on Monday\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-08-02 19:53</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<ul>\n <li>Futures rise amid earnings optimism; Dollar dips.</li>\n <li>Square, Moderna, First Solar and more made the biggest moves in the premarket.</li>\n <li>Treasuries steady; crude oil declines on China outlook.</li>\n</ul>\n<p>(August&nbsp;2)&nbsp;U.S. index futures gained along with European stocks as upbeat earnings and a surge in corporatedealmakinglifted sentiment, offsetting lingering concerns over China’s regulatory crackdown and the spread of the delta virus variant.</p>\n<p>U.S. S&amp;P 500 E-minis were up 19.5 points, or 0.44%, at 07:52 a.m. ET. Dow E-minis gained 118 points, or 0.34%, while Nasdaq 100 E-minis rose 66.75 points, or 0.45%.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ffb408f47638770562209367ca7ab1f1\" tg-width=\"1242\" tg-height=\"517\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p><b>Stocks making the biggest moves in the premarket:</b></p>\n<p><b>1)&nbsp;Square(SQ)</b> – The digital payments company agreed to buy Australia’s Afterpayfor about $29 billion in stock, representing a roughly 30% premium for Afterpay shareholders. Square shares fell 4.8% in the premarket, but news of the deal boosted shares of U.S.-based payment companyAffirm(AFRM) by 8.2%.</p>\n<p><b>2)&nbsp;Zoom Video(ZM) </b>– The video conferencing companyagreed to pay $85 millionto settle a lawsuit accusing it violated the privacy rights of users. It also agreed to beef up its security practices to prevent so-called “Zoombombing,” where hackers disrupted Zoom meetings.</p>\n<p><b>3)&nbsp;General Electric(GE)</b> – GE has completed its previously announced one-for-eight reverse stock split and will begin trading on a post-split basis today.</p>\n<p><b>4)&nbsp;Moderna(MRNA),Pfizer(PFE),BioNTech(BNTX)</b> – Moderna and Pfizer both raised prices for their Covid-19 vaccines in their latest supply contracts, according to the Financial Times. Additionally, The Wall Street Journal reported that the Food and Drug Administration is under pressure to give both vaccines full approval and that this could happen within the next month for Pfizer and partner BioNTech. Moderna rose 2.5% in the premarket, Pfizer gained 1%, while BioNTech surged 5.1%.</p>\n<p><b>5)&nbsp;Foot Locker(FL)</b> – The athletic footwear and apparel retailer announced a deal to buy California-based shoe store chain WSS for $750 million and Japan-based streetwear brand Atmos for $360 million.</p>\n<p><b>6)&nbsp;Uber Technologies(UBER)</b> – Shares of Uber gained 1.1% in premarket trading after Gordon Haskett Research Advisors initiated coverage with a “buy” rating. Haskett called Uber a company that is continually engraining itself in the everyday lives of consumers through its ride-hailing and food delivery services.</p>\n<p><b>7)&nbsp;Capri Holdings(CPRI)</b> – Capri rose 1.2% in the premarket following an upgrade to “buy” from “neutral” at MKM Partners, which noted a string of better than expected quarters for the company behind brands like Michael Kors and Versace. MKM also cited an overall improvement in the luxury goods sector.</p>\n<p><b>8)&nbsp;Discovery(DISCA)</b> – Discovery is in informal talks about a potential bid for British state-owned broadcaster Channel 4, according to Britain’s Telegraph newspaper.</p>\n<p><b>9)&nbsp;Robinhood(HOOD)</b> – More than 300,000 users of the stock trading app bought shares in Robinhood’s initial public offering last week, according to The Wall Street Journal. That represents about 1.3% of the company’s funded account base. Robinhood added 1.5% in premarket trading.</p>\n<p><b>10)&nbsp;Parker-Hannifin(PH)</b> – The maker of motion control technology and other industrial products is buying British rival Meggitt for about $8.8 billion in cash. Parker-Hannifin shares fell 2.2% in premarket action.</p>\n<p><b>11)&nbsp;Li Auto(LI)</b> – The China-based electric vehicle maker delivered 8,589 vehicles in July, an increase of 125% compared to July 2020. Li’s U.S.-based shares surged 4.3% in the premarket.</p>\n<p><b>12)&nbsp;First Solar(FSLR)</b> – The solar power systems maker’s shares gained 2.9% in premarket trading after Susquehanna Financial upgraded the stock to “positive” from “neutral,” based on upbeat management comments on solar module demand and pricing.</p>\n<p><b>In FX,</b>a relatively sedate start to the new week and month, but the Dollar has lost some recovery momentum and is moderately softer vs high beta and cyclical counterparts amidst a general improvement in risk sentiment. Hence, the index slipped back beneath 92.000 within a 92.174-91.962 band before finding a base and awaiting the final US Markit manufacturing PMI, construction spending and ISM in particular for the survey breakdown and first jobs proxy for Friday’s NFP.</p>\n<ul>\n <li>AUD/NZD/EUR/GBP - The Aussie and Kiwi have both regained some composure to pare overnight losses incurred on the back of further COVID restrictions, a Chinese manufacturing PMI miss, technical and cross-related factors. However, Aud/Usd remains heavy above 0.7350 and unlikely to trouble hefty option expiry interest at the 0.7400 strike (1.2 bn) ahead of the RBA tomorrow given expectations that the ongoing pandemic outbreaks could well force the Bank to backtrack on QE tapering plans. Meanwhile, Nzd/Usd is still rotating around the 21 DMA that comes in at 0.6979 today having failed to retain grasp of the 0.7000 handle, and the Euro is back below 1.1900 where 1.4 bn option expiries reside in wake of broadly softer than expected Eurozone manufacturing PMIs, bar Germany’s upgrade. Conversely, Cable is back over 1.3900 and Eur/Gbp is holding under 0.8550 following an unrevised final UK manufacturing PMI in advance of Thursday’s BoE.</li>\n <li>CAD/JPY/CHF - All very narrowly divergent vs the Greenback, and the Loonie holding up well in the face of weakness in WTI crude circa 1.2470, while the Yen is meandering from 109.60-77 in the run up to Tokyo inflation data on Tuesday and the Franc is straddling 0.9055 after in line Swiss CPI, a slowdown in retail sales vs pick up in the manufacturing PMI and weekly sight deposits showing just a small rise on domestic bank balances.</li>\n <li>SCANDI/EM - Contrasting manufacturing PMIs from Sweden and Norway, as the former dipped and latter gathered pace, but the Sek is straddling 10.2100 against the Eur with assistance from the aforementioned pick-up in overall risk appetite, while the Nok wanes within a 10.4910-10.4530 range due to a pull-back in Brent prices from Usd 75+/brl towards Usd 74.00.</li>\n</ul>\n<p><b>In commodities,</b>WTI and Brent have commenced the week on the backfoot, with the benchmarks lower by USD 1.00/bbl on the session. Such pressure comes in spite of the generally modestly constructive risk tone in a quiet European session with final PMIs not moving the dial much; with attention more on the weeks macro themes as outlined above. In crude specifics, updates have been very sparse throughout the session and as such the complex is more focus on COVID-19 related dynamics. With the demand-side of the equation torn between the ongoing case increases in Tokyo, among other areas, but on the flip-side supported by a push from top UK Cabinet Officials for an easing of travel restrictions and more broadly as NIH’s Fauci now does not believe the US is likely to return to lockdowns. Elsewhere, attention is on the geopolitical front and specifically last week’s attack on a ship off the Oman coast on which the US Secretary of State is confident that Iran is behind this attack. Moving to metals, spot gold and silver are modestly pressured with not too much read across from a choppy USD as we stand and likely on the back of the aforementioned broader risk tone; for reference, the yellow metal still holds the USD 1800/oz mark. Separately, much of the mornings focus is on copper where BHPs Escondida, Chile facility is facing strike action after the union rejected BHPs final labour offer. As such, Government-mediated discussions will last for 5-10 days and if the status quo is maintained and there is no breakthrough then strike action will formally commence. Given the uncertainty, LME Copper is supported on the session albeit still well off the pivotal USD 10k/t mark vs the current high USD 9799/t.</p>\n<p><b>US Event Calendar</b></p>\n<ul>\n <li>9:45am: July Markit US Manufacturing PMI, est. 63.1, prior 63.1</li>\n <li>10am: June Construction Spending MoM, est. 0.5%, prior -0.3%</li>\n <li>10am: July ISM Manufacturing, est. 60.9, prior 60.6</li>\n</ul>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"ZM":"Zoom","UBER":"优步","LI":"理想汽车",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","FL":"富乐客","PFE":"辉瑞","MRNA":"Moderna, Inc.","FSLR":"第一太阳能","BNTX":"BioNTech SE","DISCA":"探索传播",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".DJI":"道琼斯","SPY":"标普500ETF","HOOD":"Robinhood","CPRI":"Capri Holdings Ltd","GE":"GE航空航天","SQ":"Block","PH":"汉尼汾"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1191057621","content_text":"Futures rise amid earnings optimism; Dollar dips.\nSquare, Moderna, First Solar and more made the biggest moves in the premarket.\nTreasuries steady; crude oil declines on China outlook.\n\n(August 2) U.S. index futures gained along with European stocks as upbeat earnings and a surge in corporatedealmakinglifted sentiment, offsetting lingering concerns over China’s regulatory crackdown and the spread of the delta virus variant.\nU.S. S&P 500 E-minis were up 19.5 points, or 0.44%, at 07:52 a.m. ET. Dow E-minis gained 118 points, or 0.34%, while Nasdaq 100 E-minis rose 66.75 points, or 0.45%.\n\nStocks making the biggest moves in the premarket:\n1) Square(SQ) – The digital payments company agreed to buy Australia’s Afterpayfor about $29 billion in stock, representing a roughly 30% premium for Afterpay shareholders. Square shares fell 4.8% in the premarket, but news of the deal boosted shares of U.S.-based payment companyAffirm(AFRM) by 8.2%.\n2) Zoom Video(ZM) – The video conferencing companyagreed to pay $85 millionto settle a lawsuit accusing it violated the privacy rights of users. It also agreed to beef up its security practices to prevent so-called “Zoombombing,” where hackers disrupted Zoom meetings.\n3) General Electric(GE) – GE has completed its previously announced one-for-eight reverse stock split and will begin trading on a post-split basis today.\n4) Moderna(MRNA),Pfizer(PFE),BioNTech(BNTX) – Moderna and Pfizer both raised prices for their Covid-19 vaccines in their latest supply contracts, according to the Financial Times. Additionally, The Wall Street Journal reported that the Food and Drug Administration is under pressure to give both vaccines full approval and that this could happen within the next month for Pfizer and partner BioNTech. Moderna rose 2.5% in the premarket, Pfizer gained 1%, while BioNTech surged 5.1%.\n5) Foot Locker(FL) – The athletic footwear and apparel retailer announced a deal to buy California-based shoe store chain WSS for $750 million and Japan-based streetwear brand Atmos for $360 million.\n6) Uber Technologies(UBER) – Shares of Uber gained 1.1% in premarket trading after Gordon Haskett Research Advisors initiated coverage with a “buy” rating. Haskett called Uber a company that is continually engraining itself in the everyday lives of consumers through its ride-hailing and food delivery services.\n7) Capri Holdings(CPRI) – Capri rose 1.2% in the premarket following an upgrade to “buy” from “neutral” at MKM Partners, which noted a string of better than expected quarters for the company behind brands like Michael Kors and Versace. MKM also cited an overall improvement in the luxury goods sector.\n8) Discovery(DISCA) – Discovery is in informal talks about a potential bid for British state-owned broadcaster Channel 4, according to Britain’s Telegraph newspaper.\n9) Robinhood(HOOD) – More than 300,000 users of the stock trading app bought shares in Robinhood’s initial public offering last week, according to The Wall Street Journal. That represents about 1.3% of the company’s funded account base. Robinhood added 1.5% in premarket trading.\n10) Parker-Hannifin(PH) – The maker of motion control technology and other industrial products is buying British rival Meggitt for about $8.8 billion in cash. Parker-Hannifin shares fell 2.2% in premarket action.\n11) Li Auto(LI) – The China-based electric vehicle maker delivered 8,589 vehicles in July, an increase of 125% compared to July 2020. Li’s U.S.-based shares surged 4.3% in the premarket.\n12) First Solar(FSLR) – The solar power systems maker’s shares gained 2.9% in premarket trading after Susquehanna Financial upgraded the stock to “positive” from “neutral,” based on upbeat management comments on solar module demand and pricing.\nIn FX,a relatively sedate start to the new week and month, but the Dollar has lost some recovery momentum and is moderately softer vs high beta and cyclical counterparts amidst a general improvement in risk sentiment. Hence, the index slipped back beneath 92.000 within a 92.174-91.962 band before finding a base and awaiting the final US Markit manufacturing PMI, construction spending and ISM in particular for the survey breakdown and first jobs proxy for Friday’s NFP.\n\nAUD/NZD/EUR/GBP - The Aussie and Kiwi have both regained some composure to pare overnight losses incurred on the back of further COVID restrictions, a Chinese manufacturing PMI miss, technical and cross-related factors. However, Aud/Usd remains heavy above 0.7350 and unlikely to trouble hefty option expiry interest at the 0.7400 strike (1.2 bn) ahead of the RBA tomorrow given expectations that the ongoing pandemic outbreaks could well force the Bank to backtrack on QE tapering plans. Meanwhile, Nzd/Usd is still rotating around the 21 DMA that comes in at 0.6979 today having failed to retain grasp of the 0.7000 handle, and the Euro is back below 1.1900 where 1.4 bn option expiries reside in wake of broadly softer than expected Eurozone manufacturing PMIs, bar Germany’s upgrade. Conversely, Cable is back over 1.3900 and Eur/Gbp is holding under 0.8550 following an unrevised final UK manufacturing PMI in advance of Thursday’s BoE.\nCAD/JPY/CHF - All very narrowly divergent vs the Greenback, and the Loonie holding up well in the face of weakness in WTI crude circa 1.2470, while the Yen is meandering from 109.60-77 in the run up to Tokyo inflation data on Tuesday and the Franc is straddling 0.9055 after in line Swiss CPI, a slowdown in retail sales vs pick up in the manufacturing PMI and weekly sight deposits showing just a small rise on domestic bank balances.\nSCANDI/EM - Contrasting manufacturing PMIs from Sweden and Norway, as the former dipped and latter gathered pace, but the Sek is straddling 10.2100 against the Eur with assistance from the aforementioned pick-up in overall risk appetite, while the Nok wanes within a 10.4910-10.4530 range due to a pull-back in Brent prices from Usd 75+/brl towards Usd 74.00.\n\nIn commodities,WTI and Brent have commenced the week on the backfoot, with the benchmarks lower by USD 1.00/bbl on the session. Such pressure comes in spite of the generally modestly constructive risk tone in a quiet European session with final PMIs not moving the dial much; with attention more on the weeks macro themes as outlined above. In crude specifics, updates have been very sparse throughout the session and as such the complex is more focus on COVID-19 related dynamics. With the demand-side of the equation torn between the ongoing case increases in Tokyo, among other areas, but on the flip-side supported by a push from top UK Cabinet Officials for an easing of travel restrictions and more broadly as NIH’s Fauci now does not believe the US is likely to return to lockdowns. Elsewhere, attention is on the geopolitical front and specifically last week’s attack on a ship off the Oman coast on which the US Secretary of State is confident that Iran is behind this attack. Moving to metals, spot gold and silver are modestly pressured with not too much read across from a choppy USD as we stand and likely on the back of the aforementioned broader risk tone; for reference, the yellow metal still holds the USD 1800/oz mark. Separately, much of the mornings focus is on copper where BHPs Escondida, Chile facility is facing strike action after the union rejected BHPs final labour offer. As such, Government-mediated discussions will last for 5-10 days and if the status quo is maintained and there is no breakthrough then strike action will formally commence. Given the uncertainty, LME Copper is supported on the session albeit still well off the pivotal USD 10k/t mark vs the current high USD 9799/t.\nUS Event Calendar\n\n9:45am: July Markit US Manufacturing PMI, est. 63.1, prior 63.1\n10am: June Construction Spending MoM, est. 0.5%, prior -0.3%\n10am: July ISM Manufacturing, est. 60.9, prior 60.6","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":101,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":802863308,"gmtCreate":1627753461904,"gmtModify":1703495475950,"author":{"id":"3574915362300502","authorId":"3574915362300502","name":"Thunderbird","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/86528f4fb847fbbf69680f5b0c603119","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3574915362300502","idStr":"3574915362300502"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Next week will be better","listText":"Next week will be better","text":"Next week will be better","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/802863308","repostId":"2155001152","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2155001152","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1627675228,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2155001152?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-31 04:00","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Wall Street declines with Amazon; S&P 500 posts gains for month","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2155001152","media":"Reuters","summary":"U.S. consumer spending rises in June, inflation increases . NEW YORK, July 30  - U.S. stocks fell on Friday with Amazon.com shares declining after the company forecast lower sales growth, but the S&P 500 still posted a sixth straight month of gains.Amazon.com Inc shares sank after it reported late on Thursday revenue for the second quarter that was shy of analysts' average estimate and said sales growth would ease in the next few quarters as customers ventured more outside the home.Shares of oth","content":"<ul>\n <li>Pinterest sinks on stalled U.S. user growth</li>\n <li>U.S. consumer spending rises in June, inflation increases (Updates to close)</li>\n</ul>\n<p>NEW YORK, July 30 (Reuters) - U.S. stocks fell on Friday with Amazon.com shares declining after the company forecast lower sales growth, but the S&amp;P 500 still posted a sixth straight month of gains.</p>\n<p>Amazon.com Inc shares sank after it reported late on Thursday revenue for the second quarter that was shy of analysts' average estimate and said sales growth would ease in the next few quarters as customers ventured more outside the home.</p>\n<p>Shares of other internet and tech giants that did well during the lockdowns of last year, including Google parent Alphabet Inc and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FB\">Facebook</a> Inc, were mostly lower.</p>\n<p>\"Overall earnings have been good. But Amazon ... and some of last year's winners are taking some of the air out of the market today,\" said Jake Dollarhide, chief executive officer of Longbow Asset Management in Tulsa, Oklahoma. \"This market has been driven by big tech and when tech does well, the market seems to go right along with it, and when it doesn't,\" it falls.</p>\n<p>Data on Friday showed U.S. consumer spending rose more than expected in June, although annual inflation accelerated further above the Federal Reserve's 2% target.</p>\n<p>Unofficially, the Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 146.36 points, or 0.42%, to 34,938.17, the S&amp;P 500 lost 23.58 points, or 0.53%, to 4,395.57 and the Nasdaq Composite dropped 101.51 points, or 0.69%, to 14,676.76.</p>\n<p>Strong earnings and the continued rebound in the U.S. economy have helped to support stocks this month, but the rapid spread of the Delta variant of the coronavirus and rising inflation have been concerns.</p>\n<p>\"There are still some distant jitters, whispers about the Delta variant, about cases rising, and I think some underlying worries about a slowdown of the reopenings and possible reversal,\" Dollarhide said.</p>\n<p>Also on the earnings front, Pampers maker Procter &amp; Gamble Co rose as it forecast higher core earnings for this year, and U.S.-listed shares of Canada's <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/QSR\">Restaurant Brands International Inc</a> jumped after the Burger King owner beat estimates for quarterly profit.</p>\n<p>Pinterest Inc, however, plunged after saying U.S. user growth was decelerating as people who used the platform for crafts and DIY projects during the height of the pandemic were stepping out more.</p>\n<p>Caterpillar Inc shares also fell, even though the company posted a rise in second-quarter adjusted profit on the back of a recovery in global economic activity.</p>\n<p>Results on the quarter overall have been much stronger than expected, with about 89% of the reports beating analysts' estimates on earnings, according to IBES data from Refinitiv. Earnings are now expected to have climbed 89.8% in the second quarter versus forecasts of 65.4% at the start of July. (Reporting by Caroline Valetkevitch in New York Additional reporting by Sagarika Jaisinghani in Bengaluru Editing by Arun Koyyur and Matthew Lewis)</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Wall Street declines with Amazon; S&P 500 posts gains for month</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWall Street declines with Amazon; S&P 500 posts gains for month\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-07-31 04:00</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<ul>\n <li>Pinterest sinks on stalled U.S. user growth</li>\n <li>U.S. consumer spending rises in June, inflation increases (Updates to close)</li>\n</ul>\n<p>NEW YORK, July 30 (Reuters) - U.S. stocks fell on Friday with Amazon.com shares declining after the company forecast lower sales growth, but the S&amp;P 500 still posted a sixth straight month of gains.</p>\n<p>Amazon.com Inc shares sank after it reported late on Thursday revenue for the second quarter that was shy of analysts' average estimate and said sales growth would ease in the next few quarters as customers ventured more outside the home.</p>\n<p>Shares of other internet and tech giants that did well during the lockdowns of last year, including Google parent Alphabet Inc and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FB\">Facebook</a> Inc, were mostly lower.</p>\n<p>\"Overall earnings have been good. But Amazon ... and some of last year's winners are taking some of the air out of the market today,\" said Jake Dollarhide, chief executive officer of Longbow Asset Management in Tulsa, Oklahoma. \"This market has been driven by big tech and when tech does well, the market seems to go right along with it, and when it doesn't,\" it falls.</p>\n<p>Data on Friday showed U.S. consumer spending rose more than expected in June, although annual inflation accelerated further above the Federal Reserve's 2% target.</p>\n<p>Unofficially, the Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 146.36 points, or 0.42%, to 34,938.17, the S&amp;P 500 lost 23.58 points, or 0.53%, to 4,395.57 and the Nasdaq Composite dropped 101.51 points, or 0.69%, to 14,676.76.</p>\n<p>Strong earnings and the continued rebound in the U.S. economy have helped to support stocks this month, but the rapid spread of the Delta variant of the coronavirus and rising inflation have been concerns.</p>\n<p>\"There are still some distant jitters, whispers about the Delta variant, about cases rising, and I think some underlying worries about a slowdown of the reopenings and possible reversal,\" Dollarhide said.</p>\n<p>Also on the earnings front, Pampers maker Procter &amp; Gamble Co rose as it forecast higher core earnings for this year, and U.S.-listed shares of Canada's <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/QSR\">Restaurant Brands International Inc</a> jumped after the Burger King owner beat estimates for quarterly profit.</p>\n<p>Pinterest Inc, however, plunged after saying U.S. user growth was decelerating as people who used the platform for crafts and DIY projects during the height of the pandemic were stepping out more.</p>\n<p>Caterpillar Inc shares also fell, even though the company posted a rise in second-quarter adjusted profit on the back of a recovery in global economic activity.</p>\n<p>Results on the quarter overall have been much stronger than expected, with about 89% of the reports beating analysts' estimates on earnings, according to IBES data from Refinitiv. Earnings are now expected to have climbed 89.8% in the second quarter versus forecasts of 65.4% at the start of July. (Reporting by Caroline Valetkevitch in New York Additional reporting by Sagarika Jaisinghani in Bengaluru Editing by Arun Koyyur and Matthew Lewis)</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"161125":"标普500","513500":"标普500ETF","OEF":"标普100指数ETF-iShares","SSO":"两倍做多标普500ETF","AMZN":"亚马逊","SH":"标普500反向ETF","SPY":"标普500ETF",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","CAT":"卡特彼勒","OEX":"标普100","IVV":"标普500指数ETF","SPXU":"三倍做空标普500ETF","SDS":"两倍做空标普500ETF","COMP":"Compass, Inc.","UPRO":"三倍做多标普500ETF"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2155001152","content_text":"Pinterest sinks on stalled U.S. user growth\nU.S. consumer spending rises in June, inflation increases (Updates to close)\n\nNEW YORK, July 30 (Reuters) - U.S. stocks fell on Friday with Amazon.com shares declining after the company forecast lower sales growth, but the S&P 500 still posted a sixth straight month of gains.\nAmazon.com Inc shares sank after it reported late on Thursday revenue for the second quarter that was shy of analysts' average estimate and said sales growth would ease in the next few quarters as customers ventured more outside the home.\nShares of other internet and tech giants that did well during the lockdowns of last year, including Google parent Alphabet Inc and Facebook Inc, were mostly lower.\n\"Overall earnings have been good. But Amazon ... and some of last year's winners are taking some of the air out of the market today,\" said Jake Dollarhide, chief executive officer of Longbow Asset Management in Tulsa, Oklahoma. \"This market has been driven by big tech and when tech does well, the market seems to go right along with it, and when it doesn't,\" it falls.\nData on Friday showed U.S. consumer spending rose more than expected in June, although annual inflation accelerated further above the Federal Reserve's 2% target.\nUnofficially, the Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 146.36 points, or 0.42%, to 34,938.17, the S&P 500 lost 23.58 points, or 0.53%, to 4,395.57 and the Nasdaq Composite dropped 101.51 points, or 0.69%, to 14,676.76.\nStrong earnings and the continued rebound in the U.S. economy have helped to support stocks this month, but the rapid spread of the Delta variant of the coronavirus and rising inflation have been concerns.\n\"There are still some distant jitters, whispers about the Delta variant, about cases rising, and I think some underlying worries about a slowdown of the reopenings and possible reversal,\" Dollarhide said.\nAlso on the earnings front, Pampers maker Procter & Gamble Co rose as it forecast higher core earnings for this year, and U.S.-listed shares of Canada's Restaurant Brands International Inc jumped after the Burger King owner beat estimates for quarterly profit.\nPinterest Inc, however, plunged after saying U.S. user growth was decelerating as people who used the platform for crafts and DIY projects during the height of the pandemic were stepping out more.\nCaterpillar Inc shares also fell, even though the company posted a rise in second-quarter adjusted profit on the back of a recovery in global economic activity.\nResults on the quarter overall have been much stronger than expected, with about 89% of the reports beating analysts' estimates on earnings, according to IBES data from Refinitiv. Earnings are now expected to have climbed 89.8% in the second quarter versus forecasts of 65.4% at the start of July. (Reporting by Caroline Valetkevitch in New York Additional reporting by Sagarika Jaisinghani in Bengaluru Editing by Arun Koyyur and Matthew Lewis)","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":149,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":141770466,"gmtCreate":1625895283155,"gmtModify":1703750654778,"author":{"id":"3574915362300502","authorId":"3574915362300502","name":"Thunderbird","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/86528f4fb847fbbf69680f5b0c603119","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3574915362300502","idStr":"3574915362300502"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"My bet is on Tesla. A bit of appreciation with stock split should get the job done.","listText":"My bet is on Tesla. A bit of appreciation with stock split should get the job done.","text":"My bet is on Tesla. A bit of appreciation with stock split should get the job done.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/141770466","repostId":"1177397700","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1177397700","pubTimestamp":1625876446,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1177397700?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-10 08:20","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Which Company Can Reach $1 Trillion After Facebook? Here’s Our Guess.","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1177397700","media":"Barrons","summary":"Late last month, Facebook notched what could be its most notable achievement yet: Its market value hit $1 trillion. Just five U.S.-listed companies have reached the $1 trillion mark—or 0.08% of the total number of stocks currently traded on the New York Stock Exchange and Nasdaq. That’s roughly the odds of a high school basketball player making the National Basketball Association. It’s an elite club.Now that Facebook  has earned access—its market cap was down slightly by the end of the week, to ","content":"<p>Late last month, Facebook notched what could be its most notable achievement yet: Its market value hit $1 trillion. Just five U.S.-listed companies have reached the $1 trillion mark—or 0.08% of the total number of stocks currently traded on the New York Stock Exchange and Nasdaq. That’s roughly the odds of a high school basketball player making the National Basketball Association. It’s an elite club.</p>\n<p>Now that Facebook (ticker: FB) has earned access—its market cap was down slightly by the end of the week, to $980 billion—we might be waiting a while for the next entrant. That’s partly because the federal government wants to rein in big business, but also because the current trillion-dollar members have a natural incentive to keep the club small.</p>\n<p>There’s a big drop-off to the next candidate for membership—call it the Trillion-Dollar Cliff. Among U.S.-listed companies,Tesla(TSLA) is next up, with a market value of $629 billion, followed by&nbsp;Berkshire Hathaway(BRK.A),Alibaba Group Holding(BABA),Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing(TSM), and&nbsp;Visa(V).</p>\n<p>We’ve covered all of those stocks closely at&nbsp;Barron’s, and I’ve spent the past few weeks talking to colleagues about which company might be next. I’ve also queried sources and polled readers of our daily Review &amp; Preview newsletter.</p>\n<p>A few names get repeated mentions: Tesla,Nvidia(NVDA), Visa, and&nbsp;JPMorgan Chase(JPM), each of which are worth at least $400 billion.Shopify(SHOP) got a less obvious mention. The company is way down the market-value rank at $182 billion. It has become something of the anti-Amazon,providing bricks-and-mortar vendors and other businesses with easy e-commerce tools. While&nbsp;Amazon.com(AMZN) seeks to fend off regulation and a potential breakup, Shopify can keep its head down and continue to recruit new business.</p>\n<p>I’ll place my bets on Visa getting to $1 trillion next, even if it takes a while. The company is closely tied to the economic recovery, since it gets a cut of transactions that run through its global electronic-payments network.</p>\n<p>The business, which is part tech and part financial services, has a long tailwind as cash usage declines around the world. Visa shares have returned an annualized 28% over the past decade. If that pattern holds, Visa would reach $1 trillion by 2024.</p>\n<p>While the next trillion-dollar stock is clearly a guessing game, one thing is clear: Large numbers have been no impediment to future gains.Apple(AAPL) has returned an annualized 44% since it became the first U.S.-listed company to reach a $1 trillion value in August 2018. The stock closed at a record this past week, giving it a market value of $2.4 trillion.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ed700f7a7812c0bf7b9b205ad99c33e7\" tg-width=\"872\" tg-height=\"769\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>I asked Denise Chisholm, Fidelity’s sector strategist, if the so-called law of large numbers would ever kick in. “Size is not particularly predictive one way or the other,” she says. “The S&amp;P information technology, as a percent of overall S&amp;P, is now in excess of 20%. Does that have any meaning on whether or not that group or that sector can outperform in the future? The answer really is no.”</p>\n<p>Right now, the trillion-dollar members have momentum on their side. “A ball in motion tends to stay in motion,” she says.</p>\n<p>Tech’s secret sauce has been continuously expanding profit margins, with valuations that are essentially in line with their historic norms. Operating margins for the S&amp;P 500’s information technology sector have doubled in the past 15 years, to a recent 21%, according to Yardeni Research, while overall S&amp;P 500 margins have been static at 10% or so (excluding a collapse during the financial crisis).</p>\n<p>Tech’s magic—and those trillion-dollar club passes—are now hitting up against the increased likelihood of regulation. “The sheer fact of the headline of the trillion-dollar club is going to bring even more regulation,” says Jim Paulsen, chief investment officer of The Leuthold Group.</p>\n<p>On Friday, the Biden administration signed an executive order that calls for a “whole-of-government effort to promote competition in the American economy.” The order, which consists of 72 initiatives, is simultaneously broad and narrow. It pushes against consolidation while also addressing consumer pain points, like early-termination fees for broadband services, hard-to-fix consumer devices, and airline baggage fees.</p>\n<p>By now, the Biden administration recognizes that tech regulation isn’t a slam dunk with the public. Despite unease around data and privacy practices, less than half of U.S. adults are in favor of more tech regulation, according to a 2020 Pew Research poll.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/963cb5c585db8df9615cd98e0bbd4bbc\" tg-width=\"1260\" tg-height=\"840\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>A room at the F8 Developers Conference in San Jose, Calif.</span></p>\n<p>Privacy regulation is politically complicated, especially if it means reining in the advertising that enables free services like social media, internet search, and email. But there isn’t much controversial about limiting broadband charges or making it easier to fix a smartphone battery. The White House seems to be attacking companies where it hurts—their mixed record of customer service.</p>\n<p>For now, investors continue to generally overlook regulation. All five members of the trillion-dollar club were either higher or flat on Friday in the wake of Biden’s executive order.</p>\n<p>It’s time to take regulation more seriously, says Ed Yardeni, president of Yardeni Research. “A trillion here, a trillion there attracts a lot of attention from politicians.”</p>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Which Company Can Reach $1 Trillion After Facebook? Here’s Our Guess.</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhich Company Can Reach $1 Trillion After Facebook? Here’s Our Guess.\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-10 08:20 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.barrons.com/articles/which-company-can-reach-1-trillion-after-facebook-heres-our-guess-51625875587?mod=RTA><strong>Barrons</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Late last month, Facebook notched what could be its most notable achievement yet: Its market value hit $1 trillion. Just five U.S.-listed companies have reached the $1 trillion mark—or 0.08% of the ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/which-company-can-reach-1-trillion-after-facebook-heres-our-guess-51625875587?mod=RTA\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NVDA":"英伟达","JPM":"摩根大通","WMT":"沃尔玛","TSLA":"特斯拉","GOOGL":"谷歌A","AAPL":"苹果","UNH":"联合健康","TSM":"台积电","BRK.A":"伯克希尔","V":"Visa","AMZN":"亚马逊","BABA":"阿里巴巴"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/which-company-can-reach-1-trillion-after-facebook-heres-our-guess-51625875587?mod=RTA","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1177397700","content_text":"Late last month, Facebook notched what could be its most notable achievement yet: Its market value hit $1 trillion. Just five U.S.-listed companies have reached the $1 trillion mark—or 0.08% of the total number of stocks currently traded on the New York Stock Exchange and Nasdaq. That’s roughly the odds of a high school basketball player making the National Basketball Association. It’s an elite club.\nNow that Facebook (ticker: FB) has earned access—its market cap was down slightly by the end of the week, to $980 billion—we might be waiting a while for the next entrant. That’s partly because the federal government wants to rein in big business, but also because the current trillion-dollar members have a natural incentive to keep the club small.\nThere’s a big drop-off to the next candidate for membership—call it the Trillion-Dollar Cliff. Among U.S.-listed companies,Tesla(TSLA) is next up, with a market value of $629 billion, followed by Berkshire Hathaway(BRK.A),Alibaba Group Holding(BABA),Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing(TSM), and Visa(V).\nWe’ve covered all of those stocks closely at Barron’s, and I’ve spent the past few weeks talking to colleagues about which company might be next. I’ve also queried sources and polled readers of our daily Review & Preview newsletter.\nA few names get repeated mentions: Tesla,Nvidia(NVDA), Visa, and JPMorgan Chase(JPM), each of which are worth at least $400 billion.Shopify(SHOP) got a less obvious mention. The company is way down the market-value rank at $182 billion. It has become something of the anti-Amazon,providing bricks-and-mortar vendors and other businesses with easy e-commerce tools. While Amazon.com(AMZN) seeks to fend off regulation and a potential breakup, Shopify can keep its head down and continue to recruit new business.\nI’ll place my bets on Visa getting to $1 trillion next, even if it takes a while. The company is closely tied to the economic recovery, since it gets a cut of transactions that run through its global electronic-payments network.\nThe business, which is part tech and part financial services, has a long tailwind as cash usage declines around the world. Visa shares have returned an annualized 28% over the past decade. If that pattern holds, Visa would reach $1 trillion by 2024.\nWhile the next trillion-dollar stock is clearly a guessing game, one thing is clear: Large numbers have been no impediment to future gains.Apple(AAPL) has returned an annualized 44% since it became the first U.S.-listed company to reach a $1 trillion value in August 2018. The stock closed at a record this past week, giving it a market value of $2.4 trillion.\n\nI asked Denise Chisholm, Fidelity’s sector strategist, if the so-called law of large numbers would ever kick in. “Size is not particularly predictive one way or the other,” she says. “The S&P information technology, as a percent of overall S&P, is now in excess of 20%. Does that have any meaning on whether or not that group or that sector can outperform in the future? The answer really is no.”\nRight now, the trillion-dollar members have momentum on their side. “A ball in motion tends to stay in motion,” she says.\nTech’s secret sauce has been continuously expanding profit margins, with valuations that are essentially in line with their historic norms. Operating margins for the S&P 500’s information technology sector have doubled in the past 15 years, to a recent 21%, according to Yardeni Research, while overall S&P 500 margins have been static at 10% or so (excluding a collapse during the financial crisis).\nTech’s magic—and those trillion-dollar club passes—are now hitting up against the increased likelihood of regulation. “The sheer fact of the headline of the trillion-dollar club is going to bring even more regulation,” says Jim Paulsen, chief investment officer of The Leuthold Group.\nOn Friday, the Biden administration signed an executive order that calls for a “whole-of-government effort to promote competition in the American economy.” The order, which consists of 72 initiatives, is simultaneously broad and narrow. It pushes against consolidation while also addressing consumer pain points, like early-termination fees for broadband services, hard-to-fix consumer devices, and airline baggage fees.\nBy now, the Biden administration recognizes that tech regulation isn’t a slam dunk with the public. Despite unease around data and privacy practices, less than half of U.S. adults are in favor of more tech regulation, according to a 2020 Pew Research poll.\nA room at the F8 Developers Conference in San Jose, Calif.\nPrivacy regulation is politically complicated, especially if it means reining in the advertising that enables free services like social media, internet search, and email. But there isn’t much controversial about limiting broadband charges or making it easier to fix a smartphone battery. The White House seems to be attacking companies where it hurts—their mixed record of customer service.\nFor now, investors continue to generally overlook regulation. All five members of the trillion-dollar club were either higher or flat on Friday in the wake of Biden’s executive order.\nIt’s time to take regulation more seriously, says Ed Yardeni, president of Yardeni Research. “A trillion here, a trillion there attracts a lot of attention from politicians.”","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":118,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}