+Follow
JasonChang
No personal profile
16
Follow
8
Followers
0
Topic
0
Badge
Posts
Hot
JasonChang
2021-08-27
Diamond hands
Who Owns The Most AMC Stock?
JasonChang
2021-08-25
Rmb to only invest in companies you believein
Here Are the 10 Cheapest Stocks in the S&P 500
JasonChang
2021-08-20
EVs are still the future. Buy the dip.
Sorry, the original content has been removed
Go to Tiger App to see more news
{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"userPageInfo":{"id":3577198376590284,"uuid":"3577198376590284","gmtCreate":1614104352930,"gmtModify":1629423207608,"name":"JasonChang","pinyin":"jasonchang","introduction":"","introductionEn":null,"signature":"","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/739faf02f16c64fb9a9f48fee98b5cd2","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":8,"headSize":16,"tweetSize":3,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":1,"name":"萌萌虎","nameTw":"萌萌虎","represent":"呱呱坠地","factor":"评论帖子3次或发布1条主帖（非转发）","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":"success","userBadges":[{"badgeId":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493-2","templateUuid":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493","name":"Senior Tiger","description":"Join the tiger community for 1000 days","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0063fb68ea29c9ae6858c58630e182d5","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/96c699a93be4214d4b49aea6a5a5d1a4","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/35b0e542a9ff77046ed69ef602bc105d","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.11.25","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789-1","templateUuid":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789","name":"Knowledgeable Investor","description":"Traded more than 10 stocks","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e74cc24115c4fbae6154ec1b1041bf47","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d48265cbfd97c57f9048db29f22227b0","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76c6d6898b073c77e1c537ebe9ac1c57","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1102},{"badgeId":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84-1","templateUuid":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84","name":"Real Trader","description":"Completed a transaction","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100},{"badgeId":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be-2","templateUuid":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be","name":"Master Trader","description":"Total number of securities or futures transactions reached 100","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ad22cfbe2d05aa393b18e9226e4b0307","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/36702e6ff3ffe46acafee66cc85273ca","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d52eb88fa385cf5abe2616ed63781765","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":"80.33%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":4,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":null,"starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"post","tweets":[{"id":819859652,"gmtCreate":1630057024076,"gmtModify":1676530212656,"author":{"id":"3577198376590284","authorId":"3577198376590284","authorIdStr":"3577198376590284","name":"JasonChang","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/739faf02f16c64fb9a9f48fee98b5cd2","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577198376590284"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Diamond hands ","listText":"Diamond hands ","text":"Diamond hands","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/819859652","repostId":"1196717589","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1196717589","pubTimestamp":1630034074,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1196717589?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-08-27 11:14","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Who Owns The Most AMC Stock?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1196717589","media":"Thestreet","summary":"Of all the things to consider before buying a stock, understanding who owns the company’s equity is ","content":"<p>Of all the things to consider before buying a stock, understanding who owns the company’s equity is rarely a top-of-mind factor. In the case of AMC, however, the story may be a little different.</p>\n<p>Today, Wall Street Memes looks at AMC stock’s ownership and explains why it could have an impact on how the company operates – and how the stock behaves.</p>\n<p><b>AMC largest holders</b></p>\n<p>According to data provided byYahoo Finance, AMC has a float of 513 million shares. Of the total, about 74% is owned by the public, 25% by institutions and 0.3% by insiders – directors, company's officers, and those with access to company information before it becomes public.</p>\n<p>Among institutions, Vanguard and Blackrock are the top holders, with 8% and 6% of the shares, respectively. Naturally, these firms turn their holdings into shares of ETF, which in turn can (and usually do) end up owned by more individual investors.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/03a5fac491fbf01869bb0f43310b2bc9\" tg-width=\"1200\" tg-height=\"966\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>Figure 1: AMC stock ownership.ChartMill</span></p>\n<p>In May, AMC's previous largest shareholder, China's Dalian Wanda Group Co,sold30.4 million of its shares purchased in 2012 for roughly $430 million – funny enough, only days before AMC stock spiked from $14 to over $60 apiece. Currently, Wanda owns only 10,000 shares, representing a small $420,000 in market value.</p>\n<p>After the large Wanda sale, AMC's CEO Adam Aronrevealedthat no entity held an ownership stake above 10%.</p>\n<h3>Implications for the stock</h3>\n<p>A company whose ownership is widely distributed across the general public, as is the case of AMC, can benefit in a couple of ways. For instance, AMC can implement or change company policy without necessarily being aligned first with a handful of key shareholders.</p>\n<p>AMC’s ownership layout allowed for something curious to happen recently. CEO Adam Aron put to a vote theissuanceof 25 million new shares, which was then vetoed by a majority of AMC shareholders due to fears over a share price decline. Were AMC primarily owned by only a few, the polling would have likely not even taken place.</p>\n<p>In the end, the ownership structure allows AMC the flexibility to make its strategic decisions with certain independence – unless the management team chooses to consult with the broader base of individual investors more often.</p>\n<h3>In conclusion</h3>\n<p>AMC stock is owned, by and large, by retail investors – roughly speaking, the AMC ape community. Based on the latest shareholder count providedby AMC itself, the percentage of general public ownership is now greater than 80%, with each retail investor holding around 120 shares ($5,000) on average.</p>\n<p>Wall Street Memes believes that this is a good setup for AMC’s retail investors, as the fate of the company depends much less on the agenda of large institutions and a few insiders.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Who Owns The Most AMC Stock?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWho Owns The Most AMC Stock?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-08-27 11:14 GMT+8 <a href=https://www.thestreet.com/memestocks/amc/who-owns-the-most-amc-stock><strong>Thestreet</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Of all the things to consider before buying a stock, understanding who owns the company’s equity is rarely a top-of-mind factor. In the case of AMC, however, the story may be a little different.\nToday...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.thestreet.com/memestocks/amc/who-owns-the-most-amc-stock\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AMC":"AMC院线"},"source_url":"https://www.thestreet.com/memestocks/amc/who-owns-the-most-amc-stock","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1196717589","content_text":"Of all the things to consider before buying a stock, understanding who owns the company’s equity is rarely a top-of-mind factor. In the case of AMC, however, the story may be a little different.\nToday, Wall Street Memes looks at AMC stock’s ownership and explains why it could have an impact on how the company operates – and how the stock behaves.\nAMC largest holders\nAccording to data provided byYahoo Finance, AMC has a float of 513 million shares. Of the total, about 74% is owned by the public, 25% by institutions and 0.3% by insiders – directors, company's officers, and those with access to company information before it becomes public.\nAmong institutions, Vanguard and Blackrock are the top holders, with 8% and 6% of the shares, respectively. Naturally, these firms turn their holdings into shares of ETF, which in turn can (and usually do) end up owned by more individual investors.\nFigure 1: AMC stock ownership.ChartMill\nIn May, AMC's previous largest shareholder, China's Dalian Wanda Group Co,sold30.4 million of its shares purchased in 2012 for roughly $430 million – funny enough, only days before AMC stock spiked from $14 to over $60 apiece. Currently, Wanda owns only 10,000 shares, representing a small $420,000 in market value.\nAfter the large Wanda sale, AMC's CEO Adam Aronrevealedthat no entity held an ownership stake above 10%.\nImplications for the stock\nA company whose ownership is widely distributed across the general public, as is the case of AMC, can benefit in a couple of ways. For instance, AMC can implement or change company policy without necessarily being aligned first with a handful of key shareholders.\nAMC’s ownership layout allowed for something curious to happen recently. CEO Adam Aron put to a vote theissuanceof 25 million new shares, which was then vetoed by a majority of AMC shareholders due to fears over a share price decline. Were AMC primarily owned by only a few, the polling would have likely not even taken place.\nIn the end, the ownership structure allows AMC the flexibility to make its strategic decisions with certain independence – unless the management team chooses to consult with the broader base of individual investors more often.\nIn conclusion\nAMC stock is owned, by and large, by retail investors – roughly speaking, the AMC ape community. Based on the latest shareholder count providedby AMC itself, the percentage of general public ownership is now greater than 80%, with each retail investor holding around 120 shares ($5,000) on average.\nWall Street Memes believes that this is a good setup for AMC’s retail investors, as the fate of the company depends much less on the agenda of large institutions and a few insiders.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":534,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":837319765,"gmtCreate":1629856774057,"gmtModify":1676530153268,"author":{"id":"3577198376590284","authorId":"3577198376590284","authorIdStr":"3577198376590284","name":"JasonChang","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/739faf02f16c64fb9a9f48fee98b5cd2","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577198376590284"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Rmb to only invest in companies you believein","listText":"Rmb to only invest in companies you believein","text":"Rmb to only invest in companies you believein","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/837319765","repostId":"1136078272","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1136078272","pubTimestamp":1629797703,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1136078272?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-08-24 17:35","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Here Are the 10 Cheapest Stocks in the S&P 500","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1136078272","media":"Barrons","summary":"There are still plenty of cheap stocks, even with the major indexes near record highs.\nBarron’s scre","content":"<p>There are still plenty of cheap stocks, even with the major indexes near record highs.</p>\n<p>Barron’s screened the S&P 500 index and identified the 10 stocks with the lowest price-to-earnings ratios using 2022 profit projections, based on FactSet data.</p>\n<p>The 10 least expensive companies include memory-chip makers Micron Technology (ticker: MU) and Western Digital(WDC), chemical producer LyondellBasell Industries(LYB), and life insurer Lincoln National(LNC). Nine of the 10 have P/E ratios below six. Lyondell has the highest multiple in the group, at 6.5 times estimated 2022 earnings.</p>\n<p>The other six stocks are drugmakers Viatris(VTRS) and Organon(OGN); oil and gas producers Diamondback Energy(FANG) and APA(APA), formerly Apache; home builder PulteGroup(PHM), and insurer Unum(UNM).</p>\n<p>Several of the stocks have had big gains over the past year, including Diamondback, Micron, and Lincoln National, but all remain cheap based on earnings.</p>\n<p><b>10 in the Bargain Bin</b></p>\n<p>Here are the 10 stocks in the S&P 500 with the lowest price-to-earnings ratios.</p>\n<table>\n <thead>\n <tr>\n <th>Company / Ticker</th>\n <th>Recent Price</th>\n <th>Market Value (bil)</th>\n <th>1-Yr Price Change</th>\n <th>2022E* P/E Ratio</th>\n </tr>\n </thead>\n <tbody>\n <tr>\n <td>Viatris / VTRS</td>\n <td>$14.82</td>\n <td>$17.9</td>\n <td>-10.8%</td>\n <td>3.9</td>\n </tr>\n <tr>\n <td>Unum Group / UNM</td>\n <td>26.14</td>\n <td>5.3</td>\n <td>38.8</td>\n <td>4.8</td>\n </tr>\n <tr>\n <td>Diamondback Energy / FANG</td>\n <td>69.80</td>\n <td>12.6</td>\n <td>56.8</td>\n <td>5.2</td>\n </tr>\n <tr>\n <td>Western Digital / WDC</td>\n <td>61.07</td>\n <td>18.7</td>\n <td>73.0</td>\n <td>5.5</td>\n </tr>\n <tr>\n <td>APA / APA</td>\n <td>16.68</td>\n <td>6.3</td>\n <td>4.3</td>\n <td>5.6</td>\n </tr>\n <tr>\n <td>PulteGroup / PHM</td>\n <td>52.43</td>\n <td>13.6</td>\n <td>12.1</td>\n <td>5.6</td>\n </tr>\n <tr>\n <td>Organon / OGN</td>\n <td>33.61</td>\n <td>8.5</td>\n <td>N/A</td>\n <td>5.7</td>\n </tr>\n <tr>\n <td>Lincoln National / LNC</td>\n <td>66.87</td>\n <td>12.5</td>\n <td>79.6</td>\n <td>5.8</td>\n </tr>\n <tr>\n <td>Micron Technology / MU</td>\n <td>70.60</td>\n <td>79.5</td>\n <td>59.6</td>\n <td>5.9</td>\n </tr>\n <tr>\n <td>LyondellBasell Industries / LYB</td>\n <td>100.36</td>\n <td>33.5</td>\n <td>43.8</td>\n <td>6.5</td>\n </tr>\n </tbody>\n</table>\n<p>*P/E ratio based on calendar 2022 estimates; E=estimate; N/A=not applicable</p>\n<p>Source: FactSet</p>\n<p>Why are the stocks so inexpensive?</p>\n<p>Some like Viatris and Organon have ample, but manageable debt. Investors fear that profits may be peaking at companies like Micron, Lyondell, and Western Digital.</p>\n<p>These concerns could be creating opportunities for investors. Micron, whose shares trade around $70, recently initiated a small dividend resulting in an 0.6% yield. J.P. Morgan analyst Harlan Sur wrote earlier this month that he expected Micron and its rivals to be “disciplined and prudent” about adding supply in the face of strong demand. He has an Overweight rating and a $140 price target on the stock.</p>\n<p>Western Digital, at around $61, is a leading maker of flash memory. Morgan Stanley analyst Joseph Moore is upbeat on its prospects, giving the stock an Overweight rating and a $88 price target. He thinks the stock is too cheap given that he expects earnings of $10 a share next year.</p>\n<p>Organon, a Merck(MRK) spinoff that has a portfolio of off-patent drugs and a women’s health business, recently reported better-than-expected earnings. It has set an $1.12 annual dividend, for a 3.3% yield at a recent price of $33.50.</p>\n<p>Joe Cornell, the publisher of Spin-Off Research, has a Buy rating and a $45 price target on the stock. Organon has a “peer-leading” yield, he recently wrote, and potential “top-line growth and margin momentum over the medium-term.”</p>\n<p>Viatris, a generic drugmaker spun off from Pfizer(PFE), has the lowest P/E in the S&P 500 at 3.9. Its shares recently traded below $15.</p>\n<p>J.P. Morgan analyst Chris Schott was encouraged by the company’s second-quarter earnings report, but maintained a Neutral rating as he awaits more evidence of improving financial performance after a tough 2020. The stock has a 3% yield.</p>\n<p>Energy stocks have experienced a sharp pullback since June 1 because of a drop in oil prices and a sentiment shift away from the sector.</p>\n<p>Diamondback Energy, a leading exploration and production company in the Permian basin in Texas, has seen its shares drop to a recent $70 from $100. The company reported strong second-quarter results and boosted its dividend by 12.5% to an annualized $1.80 a share. The stock now yields about 2.6%.</p>\n<p>Like many E&Ps, Diamondback has a high free-cash flow yield. J.P. Morgan analyst Arun Jayaram is upbeat on Diamondback and recently estimated its net asset value at $126 a share. APA produces oil and gas in the U.S. and overseas and offers a play on a potentially large offshore oil field off Suriname in South America. Its shares trade around $16.</p>\n<p>Shares of PulteGroup, one of the largest U.S. home builders, have pulled back about 20% from a spring peak, to a recent $52 amid concerns about demand and pricing power.</p>\n<p>Evercore ISI analyst Stephen Kim, one of the most bullish Wall Street analysts on the sector, sees rising profitability for Pulte and peers. He has an Outperform rating on Pulte and a $93 price target. He sees about $8 a share in earnings this year and an above-consensus estimate of roughly $12 next year.</p>\n<p>Lyondell, the world’s third-largest independent chemical company, is a major player in plastics. Its shares recently traded around $100.Its CEO, Bob Patel, recently told <i>Barron’s</i> Jack Hough: “Whether we’re at peak, and is there a moderation or a hard reset—this is at the heart of the debate today with investors. I think there is strong demand in front of us.”</p>\n<p>Lincoln National, which offers life insurance, annuities, and other financial products, recently traded around $67, less than six times projected 2022 earnings and below a conservative measure of book value of $75. J.P. Morgan analyst Jimmy Bhullar likes Lincoln National, recently citing an “improving business mix” and “discount valuation.” He has an Overweight rating and a $81 price target.</p>\n<p>Unum, a provider of life and disability insurance, trades cheaply based on earnings and book value. That reflects in part concerns about its long-term care insurance reserves, which were strengthened in 2020. The stock, around $26, trades for about five times projected 2022 earnings and for half of book value.</p>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Here Are the 10 Cheapest Stocks in the S&P 500</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHere Are the 10 Cheapest Stocks in the S&P 500\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-08-24 17:35 GMT+8 <a href=https://www.barrons.com/articles/here-are-the-10-cheapest-stocks-in-the-s-p-500-51629756720?mod=hp_LATEST><strong>Barrons</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>There are still plenty of cheap stocks, even with the major indexes near record highs.\nBarron’s screened the S&P 500 index and identified the 10 stocks with the lowest price-to-earnings ratios using ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/here-are-the-10-cheapest-stocks-in-the-s-p-500-51629756720?mod=hp_LATEST\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"WDC":"西部数据","PHM":"普得集团","APA":"阿帕契","MU":"美光科技","LYB":"利安德巴塞尔","VTRS":"Viatris Inc.","UNM":"尤纳姆集团","OGN":"Organon & Co","FANG":"Diamondback Energy","LNC":"林肯国民"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/here-are-the-10-cheapest-stocks-in-the-s-p-500-51629756720?mod=hp_LATEST","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1136078272","content_text":"There are still plenty of cheap stocks, even with the major indexes near record highs.\nBarron’s screened the S&P 500 index and identified the 10 stocks with the lowest price-to-earnings ratios using 2022 profit projections, based on FactSet data.\nThe 10 least expensive companies include memory-chip makers Micron Technology (ticker: MU) and Western Digital(WDC), chemical producer LyondellBasell Industries(LYB), and life insurer Lincoln National(LNC). Nine of the 10 have P/E ratios below six. Lyondell has the highest multiple in the group, at 6.5 times estimated 2022 earnings.\nThe other six stocks are drugmakers Viatris(VTRS) and Organon(OGN); oil and gas producers Diamondback Energy(FANG) and APA(APA), formerly Apache; home builder PulteGroup(PHM), and insurer Unum(UNM).\nSeveral of the stocks have had big gains over the past year, including Diamondback, Micron, and Lincoln National, but all remain cheap based on earnings.\n10 in the Bargain Bin\nHere are the 10 stocks in the S&P 500 with the lowest price-to-earnings ratios.\n\n\n\nCompany / Ticker\nRecent Price\nMarket Value (bil)\n1-Yr Price Change\n2022E* P/E Ratio\n\n\n\n\nViatris / VTRS\n$14.82\n$17.9\n-10.8%\n3.9\n\n\nUnum Group / UNM\n26.14\n5.3\n38.8\n4.8\n\n\nDiamondback Energy / FANG\n69.80\n12.6\n56.8\n5.2\n\n\nWestern Digital / WDC\n61.07\n18.7\n73.0\n5.5\n\n\nAPA / APA\n16.68\n6.3\n4.3\n5.6\n\n\nPulteGroup / PHM\n52.43\n13.6\n12.1\n5.6\n\n\nOrganon / OGN\n33.61\n8.5\nN/A\n5.7\n\n\nLincoln National / LNC\n66.87\n12.5\n79.6\n5.8\n\n\nMicron Technology / MU\n70.60\n79.5\n59.6\n5.9\n\n\nLyondellBasell Industries / LYB\n100.36\n33.5\n43.8\n6.5\n\n\n\n*P/E ratio based on calendar 2022 estimates; E=estimate; N/A=not applicable\nSource: FactSet\nWhy are the stocks so inexpensive?\nSome like Viatris and Organon have ample, but manageable debt. Investors fear that profits may be peaking at companies like Micron, Lyondell, and Western Digital.\nThese concerns could be creating opportunities for investors. Micron, whose shares trade around $70, recently initiated a small dividend resulting in an 0.6% yield. J.P. Morgan analyst Harlan Sur wrote earlier this month that he expected Micron and its rivals to be “disciplined and prudent” about adding supply in the face of strong demand. He has an Overweight rating and a $140 price target on the stock.\nWestern Digital, at around $61, is a leading maker of flash memory. Morgan Stanley analyst Joseph Moore is upbeat on its prospects, giving the stock an Overweight rating and a $88 price target. He thinks the stock is too cheap given that he expects earnings of $10 a share next year.\nOrganon, a Merck(MRK) spinoff that has a portfolio of off-patent drugs and a women’s health business, recently reported better-than-expected earnings. It has set an $1.12 annual dividend, for a 3.3% yield at a recent price of $33.50.\nJoe Cornell, the publisher of Spin-Off Research, has a Buy rating and a $45 price target on the stock. Organon has a “peer-leading” yield, he recently wrote, and potential “top-line growth and margin momentum over the medium-term.”\nViatris, a generic drugmaker spun off from Pfizer(PFE), has the lowest P/E in the S&P 500 at 3.9. Its shares recently traded below $15.\nJ.P. Morgan analyst Chris Schott was encouraged by the company’s second-quarter earnings report, but maintained a Neutral rating as he awaits more evidence of improving financial performance after a tough 2020. The stock has a 3% yield.\nEnergy stocks have experienced a sharp pullback since June 1 because of a drop in oil prices and a sentiment shift away from the sector.\nDiamondback Energy, a leading exploration and production company in the Permian basin in Texas, has seen its shares drop to a recent $70 from $100. The company reported strong second-quarter results and boosted its dividend by 12.5% to an annualized $1.80 a share. The stock now yields about 2.6%.\nLike many E&Ps, Diamondback has a high free-cash flow yield. J.P. Morgan analyst Arun Jayaram is upbeat on Diamondback and recently estimated its net asset value at $126 a share. APA produces oil and gas in the U.S. and overseas and offers a play on a potentially large offshore oil field off Suriname in South America. Its shares trade around $16.\nShares of PulteGroup, one of the largest U.S. home builders, have pulled back about 20% from a spring peak, to a recent $52 amid concerns about demand and pricing power.\nEvercore ISI analyst Stephen Kim, one of the most bullish Wall Street analysts on the sector, sees rising profitability for Pulte and peers. He has an Outperform rating on Pulte and a $93 price target. He sees about $8 a share in earnings this year and an above-consensus estimate of roughly $12 next year.\nLyondell, the world’s third-largest independent chemical company, is a major player in plastics. Its shares recently traded around $100.Its CEO, Bob Patel, recently told Barron’s Jack Hough: “Whether we’re at peak, and is there a moderation or a hard reset—this is at the heart of the debate today with investors. I think there is strong demand in front of us.”\nLincoln National, which offers life insurance, annuities, and other financial products, recently traded around $67, less than six times projected 2022 earnings and below a conservative measure of book value of $75. J.P. Morgan analyst Jimmy Bhullar likes Lincoln National, recently citing an “improving business mix” and “discount valuation.” He has an Overweight rating and a $81 price target.\nUnum, a provider of life and disability insurance, trades cheaply based on earnings and book value. That reflects in part concerns about its long-term care insurance reserves, which were strengthened in 2020. The stock, around $26, trades for about five times projected 2022 earnings and for half of book value.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":270,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":838407713,"gmtCreate":1629422567332,"gmtModify":1676530034705,"author":{"id":"3577198376590284","authorId":"3577198376590284","authorIdStr":"3577198376590284","name":"JasonChang","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/739faf02f16c64fb9a9f48fee98b5cd2","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577198376590284"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"EVs are still the future. Buy the dip. ","listText":"EVs are still the future. Buy the dip. ","text":"EVs are still the future. Buy the dip.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/838407713","repostId":"1133200546","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":459,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":819859652,"gmtCreate":1630057024076,"gmtModify":1676530212656,"author":{"id":"3577198376590284","authorId":"3577198376590284","authorIdStr":"3577198376590284","name":"JasonChang","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/739faf02f16c64fb9a9f48fee98b5cd2","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577198376590284"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Diamond hands ","listText":"Diamond hands ","text":"Diamond hands","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/819859652","repostId":"1196717589","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1196717589","pubTimestamp":1630034074,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1196717589?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-08-27 11:14","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Who Owns The Most AMC Stock?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1196717589","media":"Thestreet","summary":"Of all the things to consider before buying a stock, understanding who owns the company’s equity is ","content":"<p>Of all the things to consider before buying a stock, understanding who owns the company’s equity is rarely a top-of-mind factor. In the case of AMC, however, the story may be a little different.</p>\n<p>Today, Wall Street Memes looks at AMC stock’s ownership and explains why it could have an impact on how the company operates – and how the stock behaves.</p>\n<p><b>AMC largest holders</b></p>\n<p>According to data provided byYahoo Finance, AMC has a float of 513 million shares. Of the total, about 74% is owned by the public, 25% by institutions and 0.3% by insiders – directors, company's officers, and those with access to company information before it becomes public.</p>\n<p>Among institutions, Vanguard and Blackrock are the top holders, with 8% and 6% of the shares, respectively. Naturally, these firms turn their holdings into shares of ETF, which in turn can (and usually do) end up owned by more individual investors.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/03a5fac491fbf01869bb0f43310b2bc9\" tg-width=\"1200\" tg-height=\"966\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>Figure 1: AMC stock ownership.ChartMill</span></p>\n<p>In May, AMC's previous largest shareholder, China's Dalian Wanda Group Co,sold30.4 million of its shares purchased in 2012 for roughly $430 million – funny enough, only days before AMC stock spiked from $14 to over $60 apiece. Currently, Wanda owns only 10,000 shares, representing a small $420,000 in market value.</p>\n<p>After the large Wanda sale, AMC's CEO Adam Aronrevealedthat no entity held an ownership stake above 10%.</p>\n<h3>Implications for the stock</h3>\n<p>A company whose ownership is widely distributed across the general public, as is the case of AMC, can benefit in a couple of ways. For instance, AMC can implement or change company policy without necessarily being aligned first with a handful of key shareholders.</p>\n<p>AMC’s ownership layout allowed for something curious to happen recently. CEO Adam Aron put to a vote theissuanceof 25 million new shares, which was then vetoed by a majority of AMC shareholders due to fears over a share price decline. Were AMC primarily owned by only a few, the polling would have likely not even taken place.</p>\n<p>In the end, the ownership structure allows AMC the flexibility to make its strategic decisions with certain independence – unless the management team chooses to consult with the broader base of individual investors more often.</p>\n<h3>In conclusion</h3>\n<p>AMC stock is owned, by and large, by retail investors – roughly speaking, the AMC ape community. Based on the latest shareholder count providedby AMC itself, the percentage of general public ownership is now greater than 80%, with each retail investor holding around 120 shares ($5,000) on average.</p>\n<p>Wall Street Memes believes that this is a good setup for AMC’s retail investors, as the fate of the company depends much less on the agenda of large institutions and a few insiders.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Who Owns The Most AMC Stock?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWho Owns The Most AMC Stock?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-08-27 11:14 GMT+8 <a href=https://www.thestreet.com/memestocks/amc/who-owns-the-most-amc-stock><strong>Thestreet</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Of all the things to consider before buying a stock, understanding who owns the company’s equity is rarely a top-of-mind factor. In the case of AMC, however, the story may be a little different.\nToday...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.thestreet.com/memestocks/amc/who-owns-the-most-amc-stock\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AMC":"AMC院线"},"source_url":"https://www.thestreet.com/memestocks/amc/who-owns-the-most-amc-stock","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1196717589","content_text":"Of all the things to consider before buying a stock, understanding who owns the company’s equity is rarely a top-of-mind factor. In the case of AMC, however, the story may be a little different.\nToday, Wall Street Memes looks at AMC stock’s ownership and explains why it could have an impact on how the company operates – and how the stock behaves.\nAMC largest holders\nAccording to data provided byYahoo Finance, AMC has a float of 513 million shares. Of the total, about 74% is owned by the public, 25% by institutions and 0.3% by insiders – directors, company's officers, and those with access to company information before it becomes public.\nAmong institutions, Vanguard and Blackrock are the top holders, with 8% and 6% of the shares, respectively. Naturally, these firms turn their holdings into shares of ETF, which in turn can (and usually do) end up owned by more individual investors.\nFigure 1: AMC stock ownership.ChartMill\nIn May, AMC's previous largest shareholder, China's Dalian Wanda Group Co,sold30.4 million of its shares purchased in 2012 for roughly $430 million – funny enough, only days before AMC stock spiked from $14 to over $60 apiece. Currently, Wanda owns only 10,000 shares, representing a small $420,000 in market value.\nAfter the large Wanda sale, AMC's CEO Adam Aronrevealedthat no entity held an ownership stake above 10%.\nImplications for the stock\nA company whose ownership is widely distributed across the general public, as is the case of AMC, can benefit in a couple of ways. For instance, AMC can implement or change company policy without necessarily being aligned first with a handful of key shareholders.\nAMC’s ownership layout allowed for something curious to happen recently. CEO Adam Aron put to a vote theissuanceof 25 million new shares, which was then vetoed by a majority of AMC shareholders due to fears over a share price decline. Were AMC primarily owned by only a few, the polling would have likely not even taken place.\nIn the end, the ownership structure allows AMC the flexibility to make its strategic decisions with certain independence – unless the management team chooses to consult with the broader base of individual investors more often.\nIn conclusion\nAMC stock is owned, by and large, by retail investors – roughly speaking, the AMC ape community. Based on the latest shareholder count providedby AMC itself, the percentage of general public ownership is now greater than 80%, with each retail investor holding around 120 shares ($5,000) on average.\nWall Street Memes believes that this is a good setup for AMC’s retail investors, as the fate of the company depends much less on the agenda of large institutions and a few insiders.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":534,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":837319765,"gmtCreate":1629856774057,"gmtModify":1676530153268,"author":{"id":"3577198376590284","authorId":"3577198376590284","authorIdStr":"3577198376590284","name":"JasonChang","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/739faf02f16c64fb9a9f48fee98b5cd2","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577198376590284"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Rmb to only invest in companies you believein","listText":"Rmb to only invest in companies you believein","text":"Rmb to only invest in companies you believein","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/837319765","repostId":"1136078272","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1136078272","pubTimestamp":1629797703,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1136078272?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-08-24 17:35","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Here Are the 10 Cheapest Stocks in the S&P 500","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1136078272","media":"Barrons","summary":"There are still plenty of cheap stocks, even with the major indexes near record highs.\nBarron’s scre","content":"<p>There are still plenty of cheap stocks, even with the major indexes near record highs.</p>\n<p>Barron’s screened the S&P 500 index and identified the 10 stocks with the lowest price-to-earnings ratios using 2022 profit projections, based on FactSet data.</p>\n<p>The 10 least expensive companies include memory-chip makers Micron Technology (ticker: MU) and Western Digital(WDC), chemical producer LyondellBasell Industries(LYB), and life insurer Lincoln National(LNC). Nine of the 10 have P/E ratios below six. Lyondell has the highest multiple in the group, at 6.5 times estimated 2022 earnings.</p>\n<p>The other six stocks are drugmakers Viatris(VTRS) and Organon(OGN); oil and gas producers Diamondback Energy(FANG) and APA(APA), formerly Apache; home builder PulteGroup(PHM), and insurer Unum(UNM).</p>\n<p>Several of the stocks have had big gains over the past year, including Diamondback, Micron, and Lincoln National, but all remain cheap based on earnings.</p>\n<p><b>10 in the Bargain Bin</b></p>\n<p>Here are the 10 stocks in the S&P 500 with the lowest price-to-earnings ratios.</p>\n<table>\n <thead>\n <tr>\n <th>Company / Ticker</th>\n <th>Recent Price</th>\n <th>Market Value (bil)</th>\n <th>1-Yr Price Change</th>\n <th>2022E* P/E Ratio</th>\n </tr>\n </thead>\n <tbody>\n <tr>\n <td>Viatris / VTRS</td>\n <td>$14.82</td>\n <td>$17.9</td>\n <td>-10.8%</td>\n <td>3.9</td>\n </tr>\n <tr>\n <td>Unum Group / UNM</td>\n <td>26.14</td>\n <td>5.3</td>\n <td>38.8</td>\n <td>4.8</td>\n </tr>\n <tr>\n <td>Diamondback Energy / FANG</td>\n <td>69.80</td>\n <td>12.6</td>\n <td>56.8</td>\n <td>5.2</td>\n </tr>\n <tr>\n <td>Western Digital / WDC</td>\n <td>61.07</td>\n <td>18.7</td>\n <td>73.0</td>\n <td>5.5</td>\n </tr>\n <tr>\n <td>APA / APA</td>\n <td>16.68</td>\n <td>6.3</td>\n <td>4.3</td>\n <td>5.6</td>\n </tr>\n <tr>\n <td>PulteGroup / PHM</td>\n <td>52.43</td>\n <td>13.6</td>\n <td>12.1</td>\n <td>5.6</td>\n </tr>\n <tr>\n <td>Organon / OGN</td>\n <td>33.61</td>\n <td>8.5</td>\n <td>N/A</td>\n <td>5.7</td>\n </tr>\n <tr>\n <td>Lincoln National / LNC</td>\n <td>66.87</td>\n <td>12.5</td>\n <td>79.6</td>\n <td>5.8</td>\n </tr>\n <tr>\n <td>Micron Technology / MU</td>\n <td>70.60</td>\n <td>79.5</td>\n <td>59.6</td>\n <td>5.9</td>\n </tr>\n <tr>\n <td>LyondellBasell Industries / LYB</td>\n <td>100.36</td>\n <td>33.5</td>\n <td>43.8</td>\n <td>6.5</td>\n </tr>\n </tbody>\n</table>\n<p>*P/E ratio based on calendar 2022 estimates; E=estimate; N/A=not applicable</p>\n<p>Source: FactSet</p>\n<p>Why are the stocks so inexpensive?</p>\n<p>Some like Viatris and Organon have ample, but manageable debt. Investors fear that profits may be peaking at companies like Micron, Lyondell, and Western Digital.</p>\n<p>These concerns could be creating opportunities for investors. Micron, whose shares trade around $70, recently initiated a small dividend resulting in an 0.6% yield. J.P. Morgan analyst Harlan Sur wrote earlier this month that he expected Micron and its rivals to be “disciplined and prudent” about adding supply in the face of strong demand. He has an Overweight rating and a $140 price target on the stock.</p>\n<p>Western Digital, at around $61, is a leading maker of flash memory. Morgan Stanley analyst Joseph Moore is upbeat on its prospects, giving the stock an Overweight rating and a $88 price target. He thinks the stock is too cheap given that he expects earnings of $10 a share next year.</p>\n<p>Organon, a Merck(MRK) spinoff that has a portfolio of off-patent drugs and a women’s health business, recently reported better-than-expected earnings. It has set an $1.12 annual dividend, for a 3.3% yield at a recent price of $33.50.</p>\n<p>Joe Cornell, the publisher of Spin-Off Research, has a Buy rating and a $45 price target on the stock. Organon has a “peer-leading” yield, he recently wrote, and potential “top-line growth and margin momentum over the medium-term.”</p>\n<p>Viatris, a generic drugmaker spun off from Pfizer(PFE), has the lowest P/E in the S&P 500 at 3.9. Its shares recently traded below $15.</p>\n<p>J.P. Morgan analyst Chris Schott was encouraged by the company’s second-quarter earnings report, but maintained a Neutral rating as he awaits more evidence of improving financial performance after a tough 2020. The stock has a 3% yield.</p>\n<p>Energy stocks have experienced a sharp pullback since June 1 because of a drop in oil prices and a sentiment shift away from the sector.</p>\n<p>Diamondback Energy, a leading exploration and production company in the Permian basin in Texas, has seen its shares drop to a recent $70 from $100. The company reported strong second-quarter results and boosted its dividend by 12.5% to an annualized $1.80 a share. The stock now yields about 2.6%.</p>\n<p>Like many E&Ps, Diamondback has a high free-cash flow yield. J.P. Morgan analyst Arun Jayaram is upbeat on Diamondback and recently estimated its net asset value at $126 a share. APA produces oil and gas in the U.S. and overseas and offers a play on a potentially large offshore oil field off Suriname in South America. Its shares trade around $16.</p>\n<p>Shares of PulteGroup, one of the largest U.S. home builders, have pulled back about 20% from a spring peak, to a recent $52 amid concerns about demand and pricing power.</p>\n<p>Evercore ISI analyst Stephen Kim, one of the most bullish Wall Street analysts on the sector, sees rising profitability for Pulte and peers. He has an Outperform rating on Pulte and a $93 price target. He sees about $8 a share in earnings this year and an above-consensus estimate of roughly $12 next year.</p>\n<p>Lyondell, the world’s third-largest independent chemical company, is a major player in plastics. Its shares recently traded around $100.Its CEO, Bob Patel, recently told <i>Barron’s</i> Jack Hough: “Whether we’re at peak, and is there a moderation or a hard reset—this is at the heart of the debate today with investors. I think there is strong demand in front of us.”</p>\n<p>Lincoln National, which offers life insurance, annuities, and other financial products, recently traded around $67, less than six times projected 2022 earnings and below a conservative measure of book value of $75. J.P. Morgan analyst Jimmy Bhullar likes Lincoln National, recently citing an “improving business mix” and “discount valuation.” He has an Overweight rating and a $81 price target.</p>\n<p>Unum, a provider of life and disability insurance, trades cheaply based on earnings and book value. That reflects in part concerns about its long-term care insurance reserves, which were strengthened in 2020. The stock, around $26, trades for about five times projected 2022 earnings and for half of book value.</p>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Here Are the 10 Cheapest Stocks in the S&P 500</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHere Are the 10 Cheapest Stocks in the S&P 500\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-08-24 17:35 GMT+8 <a href=https://www.barrons.com/articles/here-are-the-10-cheapest-stocks-in-the-s-p-500-51629756720?mod=hp_LATEST><strong>Barrons</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>There are still plenty of cheap stocks, even with the major indexes near record highs.\nBarron’s screened the S&P 500 index and identified the 10 stocks with the lowest price-to-earnings ratios using ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/here-are-the-10-cheapest-stocks-in-the-s-p-500-51629756720?mod=hp_LATEST\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"WDC":"西部数据","PHM":"普得集团","APA":"阿帕契","MU":"美光科技","LYB":"利安德巴塞尔","VTRS":"Viatris Inc.","UNM":"尤纳姆集团","OGN":"Organon & Co","FANG":"Diamondback Energy","LNC":"林肯国民"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/here-are-the-10-cheapest-stocks-in-the-s-p-500-51629756720?mod=hp_LATEST","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1136078272","content_text":"There are still plenty of cheap stocks, even with the major indexes near record highs.\nBarron’s screened the S&P 500 index and identified the 10 stocks with the lowest price-to-earnings ratios using 2022 profit projections, based on FactSet data.\nThe 10 least expensive companies include memory-chip makers Micron Technology (ticker: MU) and Western Digital(WDC), chemical producer LyondellBasell Industries(LYB), and life insurer Lincoln National(LNC). Nine of the 10 have P/E ratios below six. Lyondell has the highest multiple in the group, at 6.5 times estimated 2022 earnings.\nThe other six stocks are drugmakers Viatris(VTRS) and Organon(OGN); oil and gas producers Diamondback Energy(FANG) and APA(APA), formerly Apache; home builder PulteGroup(PHM), and insurer Unum(UNM).\nSeveral of the stocks have had big gains over the past year, including Diamondback, Micron, and Lincoln National, but all remain cheap based on earnings.\n10 in the Bargain Bin\nHere are the 10 stocks in the S&P 500 with the lowest price-to-earnings ratios.\n\n\n\nCompany / Ticker\nRecent Price\nMarket Value (bil)\n1-Yr Price Change\n2022E* P/E Ratio\n\n\n\n\nViatris / VTRS\n$14.82\n$17.9\n-10.8%\n3.9\n\n\nUnum Group / UNM\n26.14\n5.3\n38.8\n4.8\n\n\nDiamondback Energy / FANG\n69.80\n12.6\n56.8\n5.2\n\n\nWestern Digital / WDC\n61.07\n18.7\n73.0\n5.5\n\n\nAPA / APA\n16.68\n6.3\n4.3\n5.6\n\n\nPulteGroup / PHM\n52.43\n13.6\n12.1\n5.6\n\n\nOrganon / OGN\n33.61\n8.5\nN/A\n5.7\n\n\nLincoln National / LNC\n66.87\n12.5\n79.6\n5.8\n\n\nMicron Technology / MU\n70.60\n79.5\n59.6\n5.9\n\n\nLyondellBasell Industries / LYB\n100.36\n33.5\n43.8\n6.5\n\n\n\n*P/E ratio based on calendar 2022 estimates; E=estimate; N/A=not applicable\nSource: FactSet\nWhy are the stocks so inexpensive?\nSome like Viatris and Organon have ample, but manageable debt. Investors fear that profits may be peaking at companies like Micron, Lyondell, and Western Digital.\nThese concerns could be creating opportunities for investors. Micron, whose shares trade around $70, recently initiated a small dividend resulting in an 0.6% yield. J.P. Morgan analyst Harlan Sur wrote earlier this month that he expected Micron and its rivals to be “disciplined and prudent” about adding supply in the face of strong demand. He has an Overweight rating and a $140 price target on the stock.\nWestern Digital, at around $61, is a leading maker of flash memory. Morgan Stanley analyst Joseph Moore is upbeat on its prospects, giving the stock an Overweight rating and a $88 price target. He thinks the stock is too cheap given that he expects earnings of $10 a share next year.\nOrganon, a Merck(MRK) spinoff that has a portfolio of off-patent drugs and a women’s health business, recently reported better-than-expected earnings. It has set an $1.12 annual dividend, for a 3.3% yield at a recent price of $33.50.\nJoe Cornell, the publisher of Spin-Off Research, has a Buy rating and a $45 price target on the stock. Organon has a “peer-leading” yield, he recently wrote, and potential “top-line growth and margin momentum over the medium-term.”\nViatris, a generic drugmaker spun off from Pfizer(PFE), has the lowest P/E in the S&P 500 at 3.9. Its shares recently traded below $15.\nJ.P. Morgan analyst Chris Schott was encouraged by the company’s second-quarter earnings report, but maintained a Neutral rating as he awaits more evidence of improving financial performance after a tough 2020. The stock has a 3% yield.\nEnergy stocks have experienced a sharp pullback since June 1 because of a drop in oil prices and a sentiment shift away from the sector.\nDiamondback Energy, a leading exploration and production company in the Permian basin in Texas, has seen its shares drop to a recent $70 from $100. The company reported strong second-quarter results and boosted its dividend by 12.5% to an annualized $1.80 a share. The stock now yields about 2.6%.\nLike many E&Ps, Diamondback has a high free-cash flow yield. J.P. Morgan analyst Arun Jayaram is upbeat on Diamondback and recently estimated its net asset value at $126 a share. APA produces oil and gas in the U.S. and overseas and offers a play on a potentially large offshore oil field off Suriname in South America. Its shares trade around $16.\nShares of PulteGroup, one of the largest U.S. home builders, have pulled back about 20% from a spring peak, to a recent $52 amid concerns about demand and pricing power.\nEvercore ISI analyst Stephen Kim, one of the most bullish Wall Street analysts on the sector, sees rising profitability for Pulte and peers. He has an Outperform rating on Pulte and a $93 price target. He sees about $8 a share in earnings this year and an above-consensus estimate of roughly $12 next year.\nLyondell, the world’s third-largest independent chemical company, is a major player in plastics. Its shares recently traded around $100.Its CEO, Bob Patel, recently told Barron’s Jack Hough: “Whether we’re at peak, and is there a moderation or a hard reset—this is at the heart of the debate today with investors. I think there is strong demand in front of us.”\nLincoln National, which offers life insurance, annuities, and other financial products, recently traded around $67, less than six times projected 2022 earnings and below a conservative measure of book value of $75. J.P. Morgan analyst Jimmy Bhullar likes Lincoln National, recently citing an “improving business mix” and “discount valuation.” He has an Overweight rating and a $81 price target.\nUnum, a provider of life and disability insurance, trades cheaply based on earnings and book value. That reflects in part concerns about its long-term care insurance reserves, which were strengthened in 2020. The stock, around $26, trades for about five times projected 2022 earnings and for half of book value.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":270,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":838407713,"gmtCreate":1629422567332,"gmtModify":1676530034705,"author":{"id":"3577198376590284","authorId":"3577198376590284","authorIdStr":"3577198376590284","name":"JasonChang","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/739faf02f16c64fb9a9f48fee98b5cd2","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577198376590284"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"EVs are still the future. Buy the dip. ","listText":"EVs are still the future. Buy the dip. ","text":"EVs are still the future. Buy the dip.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/838407713","repostId":"1133200546","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":459,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}
