Generalcarh personal page - To The Moon

Generalcarh

Generalcarh

No personal profile

1Follow

0Followers

0Topic

0Badge

2023-08-30

The stock should dip below IPO. It does not make sense the market value is more than Boeing and Goldman Saches

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2023-03-28

We should short it

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2023-01-26

$SINGAPORE AIRLINES LTD(C6L.SI)$

2022-11-01

It is interesting that a company CFO does stock buy back by himself.

Singapore Stocks to Watch: Parkway Life Reit, CapitaLand Ascendas Reit, Japfa, Sakae

2021-08-05

$STRAITS TRADING CO. LTD(S20.SI)$[Miser] [Miser]

2021-08-02

???‍???‍???‍???‍???‍???‍???‍?$SUNPOWER GROUP LTD.(5GD.SI)$??‍?

When Will Stocks Drop? Watch Profit Margins (and Get Nervous)

2021-05-01

Xpeng

Sorry, the original content has been removed

Go to Tiger App to see more news

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"userPageInfo":{"id":"3580076090108797","uuid":"3580076090108797","gmtCreate":1616986354488,"gmtModify":1666408839482,"name":"Generalcarh","pinyin":"generalcarh","introduction":"","introductionEn":"","signature":"","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/810d09784518dd2cf3a22ee58e8e060e","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":0,"headSize":1,"tweetSize":7,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":1,"name":"萌萌虎","nameTw":"萌萌虎","represent":"呱呱坠地","factor":"评论帖子3次或发布1条主帖（非转发）","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":"success","userBadges":[{"badgeId":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493-2","templateUuid":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493","name":"Senior Tiger","description":"Join the tiger community for 1000 days","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0063fb68ea29c9ae6858c58630e182d5","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/96c699a93be4214d4b49aea6a5a5d1a4","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/35b0e542a9ff77046ed69ef602bc105d","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.12.25","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"44212b71d0be4ec88898348dbe882e03-1","templateUuid":"44212b71d0be4ec88898348dbe882e03","name":"Boss Tiger","description":"The transaction amount of the securities account reaches $100,000","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c8dfc27c1ee0e25db1c93e9d0b641101","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f43908c142f8a33c78f5bdf0e2897488","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/82165ff19cb8a786e8919f92acee5213","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.07.14","exceedPercentage":"60.81%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1101},{"badgeId":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84-1","templateUuid":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84","name":"Real Trader","description":"Completed a transaction","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":3,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":null,"starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"post","tweets":[{"id":214274079555632,"gmtCreate":1693352643501,"gmtModify":1693352649220,"author":{"id":"3580076090108797","authorId":"3580076090108797","name":"Generalcarh","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/810d09784518dd2cf3a22ee58e8e060e","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3580076090108797","authorIdStr":"3580076090108797"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"The stock should dip below IPO. It does not make sense the market value is more than Boeing and Goldman Saches&nbsp;","listText":"The stock should dip below IPO. It does not make sense the market value is more than Boeing and Goldman Saches&nbsp;","text":"The stock should dip below IPO. It does not make sense the market value is more than Boeing and Goldman Saches","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/214274079555632","repostId":"2363938416","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":130,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9941337260,"gmtCreate":1679972727450,"gmtModify":1679972731647,"author":{"id":"3580076090108797","authorId":"3580076090108797","name":"Generalcarh","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/810d09784518dd2cf3a22ee58e8e060e","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3580076090108797","authorIdStr":"3580076090108797"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"We should short it","listText":"We should short it","text":"We should short it","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9941337260","repostId":"2322477351","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":278,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9952643632,"gmtCreate":1674706521727,"gmtModify":1676538954270,"author":{"id":"3580076090108797","authorId":"3580076090108797","name":"Generalcarh","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/810d09784518dd2cf3a22ee58e8e060e","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3580076090108797","authorIdStr":"3580076090108797"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/C6L.SI\">$SINGAPORE AIRLINES LTD(C6L.SI)$&nbsp;</a>","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/C6L.SI\">$SINGAPORE AIRLINES LTD(C6L.SI)$&nbsp;</a>","text":"$SINGAPORE AIRLINES LTD(C6L.SI)$","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/3eeb6aebd244e08dced4df0abe877bcd","width":"828","height":"1632"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9952643632","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":228,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9985062115,"gmtCreate":1667271235437,"gmtModify":1676537889007,"author":{"id":"3580076090108797","authorId":"3580076090108797","name":"Generalcarh","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/810d09784518dd2cf3a22ee58e8e060e","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3580076090108797","authorIdStr":"3580076090108797"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"It is interesting that a company CFO does stock buy back by himself.","listText":"It is interesting that a company CFO does stock buy back by himself.","text":"It is interesting that a company CFO does stock buy back by himself.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9985062115","repostId":"1141395469","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1141395469","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1667264215,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1141395469?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-11-01 08:56","market":"sg","language":"en","title":"Singapore Stocks to Watch: Parkway Life Reit, CapitaLand Ascendas Reit, Japfa, Sakae","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1141395469","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"The following companies saw new developments that may affect trading of their securities on Tuesday ","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>The following companies saw new developments that may affect trading of their securities on Tuesday (Nov 1):</p><p><b>Parkway</b><b> Life Reit </b>on Tuesday (Nov 1) posted a 0.1 per cent rise in net property income to S$82.8 million in its third quarter ended Sep 30, from S$82.7 million in the same period a year ago.</p><p>Gross revenue, meanwhile, was down 1.3 per cent to S$89 million, weighed by the depreciation of the Japanese yen and loss of income from the divestment of a non-core asset in 2021, according to a business update. In Q3 2021, gross revenue stood at S$90.1 million.</p><p><b>Capitaland Ascendas Reit </b>posted a positive rental reversion of 5.4 per cent for lease renewals in Q3 ended September, down from 13.2 per cent in Q2, the manager announced in a quarterly business update on Monday (Oct 31).</p><p>It expects rental reversion for FY2022 to be in the “positive mid-single digit range”. In the year to date, rental reversion stands at 8 per cent.</p><p>Agri-Food company <b>Japfa</b> posted a net profit of US$46.3 million for the first nine months ended September, down 59 per cent from a net profit of US$113.9 million in the year-ago period.</p><p>This comes despite a 10 per cent increase in revenue to US$3.7 billion for 9M FY2022, which was mainly driven by higher sales volume across all segments, up from US$3.4 billion the year before, the group said in a bourse filing on Monday (Oct 31).</p><p>Mainboard-Listed restaurant operator <b>Sakae</b> Holdings has suspended its share buyback after its chief financial officer (CFO) Tan Yiok Ping wrongly bought back the company’s shares at S$0.118, above the maximum allowed price of S$0.104.</p><p>On Oct 27, Tan had queued the purchase of shares, at a share buyback purchase price of up to S$0.118, through the company’s account with UOB Kay Hian.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Singapore Stocks to Watch: Parkway Life Reit, CapitaLand Ascendas Reit, Japfa, Sakae</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSingapore Stocks to Watch: Parkway Life Reit, CapitaLand Ascendas Reit, Japfa, Sakae\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-11-01 08:56</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>The following companies saw new developments that may affect trading of their securities on Tuesday (Nov 1):</p><p><b>Parkway</b><b> Life Reit </b>on Tuesday (Nov 1) posted a 0.1 per cent rise in net property income to S$82.8 million in its third quarter ended Sep 30, from S$82.7 million in the same period a year ago.</p><p>Gross revenue, meanwhile, was down 1.3 per cent to S$89 million, weighed by the depreciation of the Japanese yen and loss of income from the divestment of a non-core asset in 2021, according to a business update. In Q3 2021, gross revenue stood at S$90.1 million.</p><p><b>Capitaland Ascendas Reit </b>posted a positive rental reversion of 5.4 per cent for lease renewals in Q3 ended September, down from 13.2 per cent in Q2, the manager announced in a quarterly business update on Monday (Oct 31).</p><p>It expects rental reversion for FY2022 to be in the “positive mid-single digit range”. In the year to date, rental reversion stands at 8 per cent.</p><p>Agri-Food company <b>Japfa</b> posted a net profit of US$46.3 million for the first nine months ended September, down 59 per cent from a net profit of US$113.9 million in the year-ago period.</p><p>This comes despite a 10 per cent increase in revenue to US$3.7 billion for 9M FY2022, which was mainly driven by higher sales volume across all segments, up from US$3.4 billion the year before, the group said in a bourse filing on Monday (Oct 31).</p><p>Mainboard-Listed restaurant operator <b>Sakae</b> Holdings has suspended its share buyback after its chief financial officer (CFO) Tan Yiok Ping wrongly bought back the company’s shares at S$0.118, above the maximum allowed price of S$0.104.</p><p>On Oct 27, Tan had queued the purchase of shares, at a share buyback purchase price of up to S$0.118, through the company’s account with UOB Kay Hian.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"5DO.SI":"荣控股","C2PU.SI":"百汇生命产业信托","A17U.SI":"凯德腾飞房产信托","UD2.SI":"JAPFA LTD."},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1141395469","content_text":"The following companies saw new developments that may affect trading of their securities on Tuesday (Nov 1):Parkway Life Reit on Tuesday (Nov 1) posted a 0.1 per cent rise in net property income to S$82.8 million in its third quarter ended Sep 30, from S$82.7 million in the same period a year ago.Gross revenue, meanwhile, was down 1.3 per cent to S$89 million, weighed by the depreciation of the Japanese yen and loss of income from the divestment of a non-core asset in 2021, according to a business update. In Q3 2021, gross revenue stood at S$90.1 million.Capitaland Ascendas Reit posted a positive rental reversion of 5.4 per cent for lease renewals in Q3 ended September, down from 13.2 per cent in Q2, the manager announced in a quarterly business update on Monday (Oct 31).It expects rental reversion for FY2022 to be in the “positive mid-single digit range”. In the year to date, rental reversion stands at 8 per cent.Agri-Food company Japfa posted a net profit of US$46.3 million for the first nine months ended September, down 59 per cent from a net profit of US$113.9 million in the year-ago period.This comes despite a 10 per cent increase in revenue to US$3.7 billion for 9M FY2022, which was mainly driven by higher sales volume across all segments, up from US$3.4 billion the year before, the group said in a bourse filing on Monday (Oct 31).Mainboard-Listed restaurant operator Sakae Holdings has suspended its share buyback after its chief financial officer (CFO) Tan Yiok Ping wrongly bought back the company’s shares at S$0.118, above the maximum allowed price of S$0.104.On Oct 27, Tan had queued the purchase of shares, at a share buyback purchase price of up to S$0.118, through the company’s account with UOB Kay Hian.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":276,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":899192450,"gmtCreate":1628167156170,"gmtModify":1703502409912,"author":{"id":"3580076090108797","authorId":"3580076090108797","name":"Generalcarh","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/810d09784518dd2cf3a22ee58e8e060e","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3580076090108797","authorIdStr":"3580076090108797"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/S20.SI\">$STRAITS TRADING CO. LTD(S20.SI)$</a>[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/S20.SI\">$STRAITS TRADING CO. LTD(S20.SI)$</a>[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;","text":"$STRAITS TRADING CO. LTD(S20.SI)$[Miser] [Miser]","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/981869ff4cf43a754078fee4dfc8b014","width":"828","height":"1434"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/899192450","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":245,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":804942977,"gmtCreate":1627918215499,"gmtModify":1703497945032,"author":{"id":"3580076090108797","authorId":"3580076090108797","name":"Generalcarh","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/810d09784518dd2cf3a22ee58e8e060e","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3580076090108797","authorIdStr":"3580076090108797"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"???‍???‍???‍???‍???‍???‍???‍?<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/5GD.SI\">$SUNPOWER GROUP LTD.(5GD.SI)$</a>??‍?","listText":"???‍???‍???‍???‍???‍???‍???‍?<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/5GD.SI\">$SUNPOWER GROUP LTD.(5GD.SI)$</a>??‍?","text":"???‍???‍???‍???‍???‍???‍???‍?$SUNPOWER GROUP LTD.(5GD.SI)$??‍?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/804942977","repostId":"1196763976","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1196763976","pubTimestamp":1627903466,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1196763976?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-08-02 19:24","market":"us","language":"en","title":"When Will Stocks Drop? Watch Profit Margins (and Get Nervous)","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1196763976","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"The evidence is mounting that companies are having a harder time passing off cost increases to their","content":"<blockquote>\n The evidence is mounting that companies are having a harder time passing off cost&nbsp;increases to their customers.\n</blockquote>\n<p>Want to know where the S&amp;P 500 Index may be headed after reaching another record high? Take a look at profit margins.</p>\n<p>Operating margin forecasts are a strong leading indicator of stock prices. A decline in such outlooks preceded routs in the S&amp;P 500 in 2011, 2015, 2018 and 2020. What’s concerning now is that analysts have stopped raising their forecasts, and if they begin to lower them, it's likely to lead to a dip in the broader market again. And it’s not like there’s a lot of room for further improvement in margins, defined as earnings before interest and taxes divided by sales. The consensus among analysts is that they will expand to 16.7% over the next 12 months, topping the previous record of 16.4% set in 2018.</p>\n<p>The relationship between S&amp;P 500 profitability and inflation indicators is murky at best, but recent spikes in the producer price index and a smaller increase in the consumer price index is enough to raise a caution flag for equity margin expansion potential for the next few quarters. At its peak in April, the PPI rose 9.5% from a year earlier, almost 3 standard deviations above its average over the past 30 years. (It rose 9.4% in June.) From 2010 to 2019, the median estimate of where operating margins would be 12 months into the future for S&amp;P 500 members were negatively correlated to changes in PPI. The current coefficient of minus 0.22 suggests gains in corporate profitability are likely to stall or even fall as producer prices continue to rise.</p>\n<p><b>Watch Those Margins</b></p>\n<p>Past dips in forecasted profit margins have lined up with pull-backs in equities.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2dbda2c0b9394d518fdc8af7d693c8f3\" tg-width=\"644\" tg-height=\"283\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">The difference between the PPI and CPI suggests companies are unable to pass cost increases on to consumers. The spread between the two fell to a record low of minus 5.3 percentage points in April, and is still strongly inverted at minus 4.1 percentage points. Over the last 30 years, the operating margin for the S&amp;P 500 narrowed 6.5 percentage points on average one year after the gap fell below minus 2 percentage points. Not only that, but in the year after the spread breached minus 2 percentage points, the S&amp;P fell 2.5% on average.</p>\n<p>Analysts are getting nervous. They have cut their margin estimates for a quarter of S&amp;P 500 members in the last three months. Their stocks were down 0.63%, compared with a gain of 2.20% for the index and a 3.30% increase for companies with rising margin forecasts. Slicing the index into quintiles based on changes in operating margin shows that companies with the largest declines had a median stock-price decline of 0.5%, versus a gain of 3.9% for those with the greatest expansion in consensus estimates.</p>\n<p>Industries with the most negative margin pressures are likely to be those that investors historically consider “defensive,” such as health care, utilities and consumer staples. Large companies involved in pharmaceuticals, biotechnology and life sciences, household and personal products, and utilities have historically fared worst when producer prices outrun consumer prices, and these are where margin forecasts gave dropped the most over the last three months. Margins forecasts continue to rise for the more cyclically-oriented segments of the equity market, with media, consumer services, transportation and oil and gas industries having the largest gains.</p>\n<p><b>Winners and Losers</b></p>\n<p>Cyclically-oriented sectors are relatively immune from broad profit margin compression.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/884366efc825eccec2878fcd4b3f0912\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"533\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">Though consensus expectations imply smooth sailing, companies are set up for a more challenging margin outlook as revenue growth rates likely fade, but inflation pressures remain relatively high given persistent uncertainty in the supply chain. Against this backdrop, currently selective industry margin weaknesses may start to spread to more industries, resulting in degradation of margin forecasts for the index at large. Given these estimates are a strong strong leading indicator of stock-price direction, margin trends may be a critical risk to the equity market in the months ahead.</p>","source":"lsy1584095487587","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>When Will Stocks Drop? Watch Profit Margins (and Get Nervous)</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhen Will Stocks Drop? Watch Profit Margins (and Get Nervous)\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-08-02 19:24 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2021-08-02/stock-market-margin-mayhem-looms-large-over-bull-market?srnd=premium-asia><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The evidence is mounting that companies are having a harder time passing off cost increases to their customers.\n\nWant to know where the S&P 500 Index may be headed after reaching another record high? ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2021-08-02/stock-market-margin-mayhem-looms-large-over-bull-market?srnd=premium-asia\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SPY":"标普500ETF",".DJI":"道琼斯",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2021-08-02/stock-market-margin-mayhem-looms-large-over-bull-market?srnd=premium-asia","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1196763976","content_text":"The evidence is mounting that companies are having a harder time passing off cost increases to their customers.\n\nWant to know where the S&P 500 Index may be headed after reaching another record high? Take a look at profit margins.\nOperating margin forecasts are a strong leading indicator of stock prices. A decline in such outlooks preceded routs in the S&P 500 in 2011, 2015, 2018 and 2020. What’s concerning now is that analysts have stopped raising their forecasts, and if they begin to lower them, it's likely to lead to a dip in the broader market again. And it’s not like there’s a lot of room for further improvement in margins, defined as earnings before interest and taxes divided by sales. The consensus among analysts is that they will expand to 16.7% over the next 12 months, topping the previous record of 16.4% set in 2018.\nThe relationship between S&P 500 profitability and inflation indicators is murky at best, but recent spikes in the producer price index and a smaller increase in the consumer price index is enough to raise a caution flag for equity margin expansion potential for the next few quarters. At its peak in April, the PPI rose 9.5% from a year earlier, almost 3 standard deviations above its average over the past 30 years. (It rose 9.4% in June.) From 2010 to 2019, the median estimate of where operating margins would be 12 months into the future for S&P 500 members were negatively correlated to changes in PPI. The current coefficient of minus 0.22 suggests gains in corporate profitability are likely to stall or even fall as producer prices continue to rise.\nWatch Those Margins\nPast dips in forecasted profit margins have lined up with pull-backs in equities.\nThe difference between the PPI and CPI suggests companies are unable to pass cost increases on to consumers. The spread between the two fell to a record low of minus 5.3 percentage points in April, and is still strongly inverted at minus 4.1 percentage points. Over the last 30 years, the operating margin for the S&P 500 narrowed 6.5 percentage points on average one year after the gap fell below minus 2 percentage points. Not only that, but in the year after the spread breached minus 2 percentage points, the S&P fell 2.5% on average.\nAnalysts are getting nervous. They have cut their margin estimates for a quarter of S&P 500 members in the last three months. Their stocks were down 0.63%, compared with a gain of 2.20% for the index and a 3.30% increase for companies with rising margin forecasts. Slicing the index into quintiles based on changes in operating margin shows that companies with the largest declines had a median stock-price decline of 0.5%, versus a gain of 3.9% for those with the greatest expansion in consensus estimates.\nIndustries with the most negative margin pressures are likely to be those that investors historically consider “defensive,” such as health care, utilities and consumer staples. Large companies involved in pharmaceuticals, biotechnology and life sciences, household and personal products, and utilities have historically fared worst when producer prices outrun consumer prices, and these are where margin forecasts gave dropped the most over the last three months. Margins forecasts continue to rise for the more cyclically-oriented segments of the equity market, with media, consumer services, transportation and oil and gas industries having the largest gains.\nWinners and Losers\nCyclically-oriented sectors are relatively immune from broad profit margin compression.\nThough consensus expectations imply smooth sailing, companies are set up for a more challenging margin outlook as revenue growth rates likely fade, but inflation pressures remain relatively high given persistent uncertainty in the supply chain. Against this backdrop, currently selective industry margin weaknesses may start to spread to more industries, resulting in degradation of margin forecasts for the index at large. Given these estimates are a strong strong leading indicator of stock-price direction, margin trends may be a critical risk to the equity market in the months ahead.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":394,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":101034681,"gmtCreate":1619829880343,"gmtModify":1704335413334,"author":{"id":"3580076090108797","authorId":"3580076090108797","name":"Generalcarh","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/810d09784518dd2cf3a22ee58e8e060e","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3580076090108797","authorIdStr":"3580076090108797"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Xpeng","listText":"Xpeng","text":"Xpeng","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/101034681","repostId":"1137943982","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":280,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":804942977,"gmtCreate":1627918215499,"gmtModify":1703497945032,"author":{"id":"3580076090108797","authorId":"3580076090108797","name":"Generalcarh","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/810d09784518dd2cf3a22ee58e8e060e","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3580076090108797","authorIdStr":"3580076090108797"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"???‍???‍???‍???‍???‍???‍???‍?<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/5GD.SI\">$SUNPOWER GROUP LTD.(5GD.SI)$</a>??‍?","listText":"???‍???‍???‍???‍???‍???‍???‍?<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/5GD.SI\">$SUNPOWER GROUP LTD.(5GD.SI)$</a>??‍?","text":"???‍???‍???‍???‍???‍???‍???‍?$SUNPOWER GROUP LTD.(5GD.SI)$??‍?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/804942977","repostId":"1196763976","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":394,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":214274079555632,"gmtCreate":1693352643501,"gmtModify":1693352649220,"author":{"id":"3580076090108797","authorId":"3580076090108797","name":"Generalcarh","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/810d09784518dd2cf3a22ee58e8e060e","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3580076090108797","authorIdStr":"3580076090108797"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"The stock should dip below IPO. It does not make sense the market value is more than Boeing and Goldman Saches&nbsp;","listText":"The stock should dip below IPO. It does not make sense the market value is more than Boeing and Goldman Saches&nbsp;","text":"The stock should dip below IPO. It does not make sense the market value is more than Boeing and Goldman Saches","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/214274079555632","repostId":"2363938416","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2363938416","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1693351630,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2363938416?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2023-08-30 07:27","market":"us","language":"en","title":"VinFast Stock Plunges 44%, Wiping Out $90 Billion in Market Value","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2363938416","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"The VinFast Auto trading saga continues to get more and more interesting. Shares of the Vietnamese EV start-up snapped a six-day winning streak, falling 44% Tuesday, wiping out some $90 billion in market value.VinFast's controlling shareholder Pham Nhat Vuong lost about $67 billion in paper wealth. At Monday's close, his VinFast stake was worth roughly $141 billion, enough to place him just below Jeff Bezos on Bloomberg's list of richest humans. At Tuesday's close, his stake was worth about $74 billion, placing him just above Jim Walton, the son of Walmart  founder Sam Walton.Vuong's holdings of VinFast stock are a little complicated. About 1.2 billion of VinFast's 2.3 billion shares outstanding are held by Vingroup . Vuong owns 51% of that stock either directly or through Vietnam Investment Group, or VIG, in which Vuong is listed as the sole shareholder. About 1.1 billion shares of VinFast are also held directly by VIG and Asian Star, which is another entity controlled by Vuong.It is ","content":"<html><head></head><body><p style=\"text-align: start;\">The VinFast Auto trading saga continues to get more and more interesting. Shares of the Vietnamese EV start-up snapped a six-day winning streak, falling 44% Tuesday, wiping out some $90 billion in market value.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/78bd7d967afd12d0aaddcca9265aa51b\" alt=\"VinFast’s wild ride continued on Tuesday with a 44% stock drop.\" title=\"VinFast’s wild ride continued on Tuesday with a 44% stock drop.\" tg-width=\"639\" tg-height=\"426\"/><span>VinFast’s wild ride continued on Tuesday with a 44% stock drop.</span></p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">VinFast’s controlling shareholder Pham Nhat Vuong lost about $67 billion in paper wealth. At Monday’s close, his VinFast stake was worth roughly $141 billion, enough to place him just below Jeff Bezos on Bloomberg’s list of richest humans. At Tuesday’s close, his stake was worth about $74 billion, placing him just above Jim Walton, the son of Walmart (WMT) founder Sam Walton.</p><p>Vuong’s holdings of VinFast stock are a little complicated. About 1.2 billion of VinFast’s 2.3 billion shares outstanding are held by Vingroup (VIC.Vietnam). Vuong owns 51% of that stock either directly or through Vietnam Investment Group, or VIG, in which Vuong is listed as the sole shareholder. About 1.1 billion shares of VinFast are also held directly by VIG and Asian Star, which is another entity controlled by Vuong.</p><p>The result is Vuong controls about 99.7% of VinFast stock and owns directly or indirectly through investment companies up to about 1.7 billion shares.</p><p>All this is disclosed in VinFast’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The company didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment about the holding structure.</p><p>It is a huge one-day loss, but his stake at the time of the SPAC merger was worth roughly $18 billion. He is still up more than 300%.</p><p>As for VinFast, the company still has a market capitalization greater than $100 billion. It is hanging on to its title as the third-most valuable automaker on the planet, behind Toyota Motor (TM) and Tesla (TSLA). Depending on the accounting for warrants and options it is still up on Porsche (P911.Germany) and BYD (1211.Hong Kong).</p><p>BYD is China’s largest EV maker, selling more than 1.2 million EVs, both battery-electric and plug-in hybrid, in the first half of 2023. VinFast sold about 11,300 battery-electric vehicles in the first half of 2023.</p><p>Investors believe VinFast has a bright future. Still, it is hard to justify the valuation.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>VinFast Stock Plunges 44%, Wiping Out $90 Billion in Market Value</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nVinFast Stock Plunges 44%, Wiping Out $90 Billion in Market Value\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2023-08-30 07:27</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p style=\"text-align: start;\">The VinFast Auto trading saga continues to get more and more interesting. Shares of the Vietnamese EV start-up snapped a six-day winning streak, falling 44% Tuesday, wiping out some $90 billion in market value.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/78bd7d967afd12d0aaddcca9265aa51b\" alt=\"VinFast’s wild ride continued on Tuesday with a 44% stock drop.\" title=\"VinFast’s wild ride continued on Tuesday with a 44% stock drop.\" tg-width=\"639\" tg-height=\"426\"/><span>VinFast’s wild ride continued on Tuesday with a 44% stock drop.</span></p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">VinFast’s controlling shareholder Pham Nhat Vuong lost about $67 billion in paper wealth. At Monday’s close, his VinFast stake was worth roughly $141 billion, enough to place him just below Jeff Bezos on Bloomberg’s list of richest humans. At Tuesday’s close, his stake was worth about $74 billion, placing him just above Jim Walton, the son of Walmart (WMT) founder Sam Walton.</p><p>Vuong’s holdings of VinFast stock are a little complicated. About 1.2 billion of VinFast’s 2.3 billion shares outstanding are held by Vingroup (VIC.Vietnam). Vuong owns 51% of that stock either directly or through Vietnam Investment Group, or VIG, in which Vuong is listed as the sole shareholder. About 1.1 billion shares of VinFast are also held directly by VIG and Asian Star, which is another entity controlled by Vuong.</p><p>The result is Vuong controls about 99.7% of VinFast stock and owns directly or indirectly through investment companies up to about 1.7 billion shares.</p><p>All this is disclosed in VinFast’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The company didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment about the holding structure.</p><p>It is a huge one-day loss, but his stake at the time of the SPAC merger was worth roughly $18 billion. He is still up more than 300%.</p><p>As for VinFast, the company still has a market capitalization greater than $100 billion. It is hanging on to its title as the third-most valuable automaker on the planet, behind Toyota Motor (TM) and Tesla (TSLA). Depending on the accounting for warrants and options it is still up on Porsche (P911.Germany) and BYD (1211.Hong Kong).</p><p>BYD is China’s largest EV maker, selling more than 1.2 million EVs, both battery-electric and plug-in hybrid, in the first half of 2023. VinFast sold about 11,300 battery-electric vehicles in the first half of 2023.</p><p>Investors believe VinFast has a bright future. Still, it is hard to justify the valuation.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"LU1585245621.USD":"EASTSPRING INV GLOBAL LOW VOLATILITY EQUITY FUND \"A\" (USD) ACC B","LU1435385759.SGD":"Natixis Loomis Sayles US Growth Equity RA SGD-H","LU0211328371.USD":"TEMPLETON GLOBAL EQUITY INCOME \"A\" (MDIS) (USD)   INC","BK4099":"汽车制造商","LU1720051108.HKD":"ALLIANZ GLOBAL ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE \"AT\" (HKD) ACC","BK4504":"桥水持仓","BK4548":"巴美列捷福持仓","LU2430703095.HKD":"WELLINGTON MULTI-ASSET HIGH INCOME \"AM4\" (HKD) INC","LU1839511570.USD":"WELLS FARGO GLOBAL FACTOR ENHANCED EQUITY \"I\" (USD) ACC","LU1429558221.USD":"Natixis Loomis Sayles US Growth Equity RA USD","LU0823411888.USD":"法巴消费创新基金 Cap","LU2430703178.SGD":"WELLINGTON MULTI-ASSET HIGH INCOME \"AM4H\" (SGDHDG) INC","LU2430703251.USD":"WELLINGTON MULTI-ASSET HIGH INCOME \"AM4\" (USD) INC","LU1551013342.USD":"Allianz Income and Growth Cl AMg2 DIS USD","BK4532":"文艺复兴科技持仓","BK4592":"伊斯兰概念","LU0056508442.USD":"贝莱德世界科技基金A2","LU0719512351.SGD":"JPMorgan Funds - US Technology A (acc) SGD","IE00B1XK9C88.USD":"PINEBRIDGE US LARGE CAP RESEARCH ENHANCED \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU0640476718.USD":"THREADNEEDLE (LUX) US CONTRARIAN CORE EQ \"AU\" (USD) ACC","LU2357305700.SGD":"Allianz Global Artificial Intelligence ET H2-SGD","BK4585":"ETF&股票定投概念","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","LU2249611893.SGD":"BNP PARIBAS ENERGY TRANSITION \"CRH\" (SGD) ACC","LU0820561909.HKD":"ALLIANZ INCOME AND GROWTH \"AM\" (HKD) INC","BK4555":"新能源车","LU2592432038.USD":"WELLINGTON MULTI-ASSET HIGH INCOME \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU2063271972.USD":"富兰克林创新领域基金","LU1430594728.SGD":"Eastspring Investments - Global Low Volatility Equity AS SGD","BK4527":"明星科技股","IE00BWXC8680.SGD":"PINEBRIDGE US LARGE CAP RESEARCH ENHANCED \"A5\" (SGD) ACC","LU2505996681.GBP":"WELLINGTON MULTI-ASSET HIGH INCOME \"AM4H\" (GBPHDG) INC","LU2087621335.USD":"ALLSPRING GLOBAL FACTOR ENHANCED EQUITY \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU1852331112.SGD":"Blackrock World Technology Fund A2 SGD-H","LU0198837287.USD":"UBS (LUX) EQUITY SICAV - USA GROWTH \"P\" (USD) ACC","LU1861215975.USD":"贝莱德新一代科技基金 A2","BK4574":"无人驾驶","BK4551":"寇图资本持仓","LU0211327993.USD":"TEMPLETON GLOBAL EQUITY INCOME \"A\" (USD) ACC","IE0034235188.USD":"PINEBRIDGE GLOBAL FOCUS EQUITY \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU2326559502.SGD":"Natixis Loomis Sayles US Growth Equity P/A SGD-H","LU0820561818.USD":"安联收益及增长平衡基金Cl AM DIS","LU0149725797.USD":"汇丰美国股市经济规模基金","LU1551013425.SGD":"Allianz Income and Growth Cl AMg2 DIS H2-SGD","BK4581":"高盛持仓"},"source_url":"https://dowjonesnews.com/newdjn/logon.aspx?AL=N","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2363938416","content_text":"The VinFast Auto trading saga continues to get more and more interesting. Shares of the Vietnamese EV start-up snapped a six-day winning streak, falling 44% Tuesday, wiping out some $90 billion in market value.VinFast’s wild ride continued on Tuesday with a 44% stock drop.VinFast’s controlling shareholder Pham Nhat Vuong lost about $67 billion in paper wealth. At Monday’s close, his VinFast stake was worth roughly $141 billion, enough to place him just below Jeff Bezos on Bloomberg’s list of richest humans. At Tuesday’s close, his stake was worth about $74 billion, placing him just above Jim Walton, the son of Walmart (WMT) founder Sam Walton.Vuong’s holdings of VinFast stock are a little complicated. About 1.2 billion of VinFast’s 2.3 billion shares outstanding are held by Vingroup (VIC.Vietnam). Vuong owns 51% of that stock either directly or through Vietnam Investment Group, or VIG, in which Vuong is listed as the sole shareholder. About 1.1 billion shares of VinFast are also held directly by VIG and Asian Star, which is another entity controlled by Vuong.The result is Vuong controls about 99.7% of VinFast stock and owns directly or indirectly through investment companies up to about 1.7 billion shares.All this is disclosed in VinFast’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The company didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment about the holding structure.It is a huge one-day loss, but his stake at the time of the SPAC merger was worth roughly $18 billion. He is still up more than 300%.As for VinFast, the company still has a market capitalization greater than $100 billion. It is hanging on to its title as the third-most valuable automaker on the planet, behind Toyota Motor (TM) and Tesla (TSLA). Depending on the accounting for warrants and options it is still up on Porsche (P911.Germany) and BYD (1211.Hong Kong).BYD is China’s largest EV maker, selling more than 1.2 million EVs, both battery-electric and plug-in hybrid, in the first half of 2023. VinFast sold about 11,300 battery-electric vehicles in the first half of 2023.Investors believe VinFast has a bright future. Still, it is hard to justify the valuation.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":130,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":101034681,"gmtCreate":1619829880343,"gmtModify":1704335413334,"author":{"id":"3580076090108797","authorId":"3580076090108797","name":"Generalcarh","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/810d09784518dd2cf3a22ee58e8e060e","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3580076090108797","authorIdStr":"3580076090108797"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Xpeng","listText":"Xpeng","text":"Xpeng","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/101034681","repostId":"1137943982","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1137943982","pubTimestamp":1619749878,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1137943982?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-04-30 10:31","market":"us","language":"en","title":"XPeng Vs. NIO: Which EV Stock Is The Better Buy","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1137943982","media":"seekingalpha","summary":"The EV industry experiences high growth rates and there are many new market entrants.NIO and XPeng belong to the highest-growth EV companies and have a lot of potential in their home market China.Both have some unique offerings, trade at a discount compared to Tesla, and grow more quickly. But which one is the better choice?Electric vehicle companies have experienced a big increase in investor interest over the last year, as the EV market continued to expand at a rapid pace. The number of EV sto","content":"<p><b>Summary</b></p>\n<ul>\n <li>The EV industry experiences high growth rates and there are many new market entrants.</li>\n <li>NIO and XPeng belong to the highest-growth EV companies and have a lot of potential in their home market China.</li>\n <li>Both have some unique offerings, trade at a discount compared to Tesla, and grow more quickly. But which one is the better choice?</li>\n</ul>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f4aaa88cf5d3f942b0de6eda862dd6dd\" tg-width=\"1536\" tg-height=\"1024\"><span>Photo by jonathanfilskov-photography/iStock via Getty Images</span></p>\n<p>Electric vehicle companies have experienced a big increase in investor interest over the last year, as the EV market continued to expand at a rapid pace. The number of EV stocks investors can choose from continues to rise as well, and two of the biggest ones are NIO (NIO) and XPeng (XPEV). In this article, we will take a look at these two major Chinese EV pure-plays to decide which one may be a better investment.</p>\n<p><b>XPeng Versus NIO Stock</b></p>\n<p>XPeng Inc and NIO Inc have both seen their share prices rise considerably over the last year. New investors rushed into markets, while interest in EV stocks rose, which could be seen in the share prices of the likes of Tesla (TSLA), but also with these two Chinese EV players:</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76ba39e1d303590ed1db133e32f7f347\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"467\"><span>Data by YCharts</span></p>\n<p>Right now, with shares trading at $41 and $31, respectively, NIO and XPeng are valued at $67 billion and $25 billion. This is a far cry from the $700 billion Tesla is valued at, but both NIO and XPeng still belong to the EV pure-plays with the highest market capitalizations. Others in this category include BYD (OTCPK:BYDDY) and Li Auto (LI).</p>\n<p>The big share price increases these two companies have experienced bring up the question of whether these valuations do make sense. This is a question where some will agree and others will not - both companies are growing very fast, which naturally warrants a higher valuation, but on the other hand, they are both not profitable yet, and current forecasts do see them remain unprofitable through 2022. We will take a closer look at valuation further down in this article.</p>\n<p><b>Exposure To The High-Growth Chinese EV Market</b></p>\n<p>Both companies are located in China, manufacture their cars in China, and primarily sell their vehicles in China. China is one of the biggest EV markets in the world, and the biggest overall automobile market globally. Chinese politicians have ambitious goals of increasing the amount of EVs on the country's roads, partially due to a need to reduce local emissions in order to fight smog troubles. On top of that, China has a rapidly growing middle class, which is, of course, a major tailwind for consumption, which also benefits purchases of EVs and other vehicles.</p>\n<p>In 2020, 1.3 million EVs were sold in China, which represents about 40% of the global EV market. Forecasts see a&nbsp;50% increase&nbsp;in EVs being sold in China in 2021, which gets us to an estimated 2.0 million electric vehicles being sold in China this year.</p>\n<p>The high growth rate in their home market has been a major driver for both NIO's and XPeng's growth. During 2020, NIO sold&nbsp;44,000 vehicles, but a lot more growth is forecasted for the current year. NIO planned to sell more than 20,000 vehicles in Q1 alone, which equates to an annual pace of more than 80,000, and with further ramp-up expected for Q2-Q4, it is likely that NIO will sell at least 100,000 of its EVs this year.</p>\n<p>Xiaopeng Motors, on the other hand,has sold 27,000 vehicles&nbsp;in 2020, albeit its pace already stood at more than 50,000 vehicles annually in Q4. XPeng has guided for at least 12,500 EVs being sold in Q1, and factoring in the seasonality of the business and further ramp-up of production in coming quarters, it is very likely that XPeng will more than double its sales this year.</p>\n<p>Looking at analyst estimates, we see that this year's strong growth that is expected for both companies is not an outlier. Instead, 2022 will be another year during which both NIO and XPeng should grow at a strong pace.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8d2acba3a3368db073de724bd97eb71c\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"436\"><span>Data by YCharts</span></p>\n<p>NIO is forecasted to grow its revenues to $5.4 billion this year, with another 59% growth forecasted for 2022, while revenues for 2023 are expected at $12.5 billion (up 45% versus 2022's expected revenues).</p>\n<p>XPeng data is not available at YCharts, but the growth curves look very strong as well -analysts are forecasting&nbsp;that revenues will hit $2.1 billion this year (up 130% versus 2020), and that revenues during 2022 will hit $4.2 billion, up by another 100%.</p>\n<p>Among the two, NIO is the larger one by both vehicle deliveries and revenues, which is also reflected in its higher valuation. XPeng, however, with its strong expected growth, will also become a much larger player in this space over the next couple of years.</p>\n<p>Looking at market share, we see that NIO sells about one in every 20 EVs in China, while XPeng, due to its smaller size, sells about one in every 35 EVs. Both have bigger peers in their home market China, including Tesla, but at the same time, both NIO and XPeng are growing faster than the market. This should result in ongoing market share gains for both companies over the coming years. Thanks to the ongoing introduction of new models and their aggressive growth plans, it seems likely that both companies will continue to gain share over the coming years, as their above-market growth will be maintained.</p>\n<p><b>Unique Pros For NIO And XPeng</b></p>\n<p>When looking at unique selling points for these two companies in the crowded EV market, both are trying to set themselves aside from competitors. One of NIO's best arguments for why consumers should buy a NIO-branded car is its battery-swapping technology and battery-as-a-service offering. This service allows consumers to swap their batteries in a couple of minutes, which negates one of the main arguments consumers may still hold against EVs - that it takes too long to recharge a vehicle while on a road trip or similar.</p>\n<p>With NIO's technology, which has been used millions of times already, this isn't a concern, at least while consumers live and travel in a geographic area with a dense battery-swapping network. Such networks do not exist outside of China yet, but in its home market, NIO can clearly differentiate itself from competitors with BAAS.</p>\n<p>XPeng, on the other hand, is working hard on branding itself as the \"Smart EV\" company. It puts an above-average focus on R&amp;D and is working hard on bringing smart technologies like advanced driver assistance systems to consumers. This strategy is primarily aimed at younger consumers. XPeng has managed to become one of the more popular EV players in China, but its offering is still not as unique as NIO's BAAS.</p>\n<p><b>Chinese EV Market: Tailwinds For Domestic Producers</b></p>\n<p>Tesla is still the largest EV player in the world, and it also sells a large amount of cars in China. Recent news, however, shows why domestic producers may ultimately be favored in China. Tesla is experiencing more scrutiny by the Chinese government and Chinese regulators, which has gotten so far that Tesla vehicles have been prevented from&nbsp;accessing some highways&nbsp;in the country due to safety concerns. Its vehicles have also reportedly been banned from military bases in the country, and the company has also experienced&nbsp;social media campaigns&nbsp;that are very unfavorable towards Tesla.</p>\n<p>It looks like a theme that has been visible in other industries as well - Chinese regulators and governments favor domestic producers - could hold true in the high-growth EV industry as well. This positions NIO and XPeng well for success in their home countries.</p>\n<p><b>NIO And XPeng: Valuation</b></p>\n<p>Since both companies aren't profitable yet, we can't use earnings multiple to decide whether they are undervalued or not. We can, however, look at revenue multiples to deduce whether shares are favorably priced right now.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/12557115440606d283aa6aa8ff14c611\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"433\"><span>Data by YCharts</span></p>\n<p>NIO is trading at 5.6 times 2023's expected revenue, while XPeng is valued at roughly 3 times 2023's expected revenue (data not available on YCharts). This compares favorably versus the current EV king Tesla, which trades at 8 times 2023's expected revenue. On the other hand, however, both NIO and XPeng are of course way more expensive than legacy auto companies with a growing EV presence, including Volkswagen (OTCPK:VWAGY), which trades at less than 1 times its annual sales.</p>\n<p><b>Is NIO Or XPeng A Buy</b></p>\n<p>Both companies enjoy high growth rates, have shown solid Q1 results, and both benefit from China's policy of favoring domestic companies in a range of ways. It can be expected that both NIO Inc and XPeng Inc will continue to do well operationally, and it is also worth mentioning that both companies are significantly less expensive than Tesla, the current leader in the EV space. It is noteworthy that NIO and XPeng are less expensive despite delivering stronger growth rates on a relative basis.</p>\n<p>At the same time, however, one can't say that either of these companies is inexpensive - they both still trade at large premiums over legacy auto companies.</p>\n<p>Due to the fact that NIO has gotten farther in growing its business so far, combined with the very unique BAAS offering that clearly differentiates it from peers and provides a major reason to use its products, I see it as a more favorable choice than XPeng generally. I believe this warrants a premium versus XPeng, which isn't as uniquely positioned and could experience more growing pains in coming years due to its smaller size.</p>\n<p>Nevertheless, due to valuation, I don't think NIO's shares are a great buy right here, even though I would prefer them over those of XPeng (and I would prefer both over those of Tesla). Investors may want to wait for more favorable prices before entering or expanding a position if the current valuation gives them a pause - both when it comes to these two companies, as well as when other EV companies are considered.</p>","source":"seekingalpha","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>XPeng Vs. NIO: Which EV Stock Is The Better Buy</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nXPeng Vs. NIO: Which EV Stock Is The Better Buy\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-04-30 10:31 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4422352-xpeng-vs-nio-stock-better-buy><strong>seekingalpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Summary\n\nThe EV industry experiences high growth rates and there are many new market entrants.\nNIO and XPeng belong to the highest-growth EV companies and have a lot of potential in their home market ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4422352-xpeng-vs-nio-stock-better-buy\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NIO":"蔚来","XPEV":"小鹏汽车"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4422352-xpeng-vs-nio-stock-better-buy","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5a36db9d73b4222bc376d24ccc48c8a4","article_id":"1137943982","content_text":"Summary\n\nThe EV industry experiences high growth rates and there are many new market entrants.\nNIO and XPeng belong to the highest-growth EV companies and have a lot of potential in their home market China.\nBoth have some unique offerings, trade at a discount compared to Tesla, and grow more quickly. But which one is the better choice?\n\nPhoto by jonathanfilskov-photography/iStock via Getty Images\nElectric vehicle companies have experienced a big increase in investor interest over the last year, as the EV market continued to expand at a rapid pace. The number of EV stocks investors can choose from continues to rise as well, and two of the biggest ones are NIO (NIO) and XPeng (XPEV). In this article, we will take a look at these two major Chinese EV pure-plays to decide which one may be a better investment.\nXPeng Versus NIO Stock\nXPeng Inc and NIO Inc have both seen their share prices rise considerably over the last year. New investors rushed into markets, while interest in EV stocks rose, which could be seen in the share prices of the likes of Tesla (TSLA), but also with these two Chinese EV players:\nData by YCharts\nRight now, with shares trading at $41 and $31, respectively, NIO and XPeng are valued at $67 billion and $25 billion. This is a far cry from the $700 billion Tesla is valued at, but both NIO and XPeng still belong to the EV pure-plays with the highest market capitalizations. Others in this category include BYD (OTCPK:BYDDY) and Li Auto (LI).\nThe big share price increases these two companies have experienced bring up the question of whether these valuations do make sense. This is a question where some will agree and others will not - both companies are growing very fast, which naturally warrants a higher valuation, but on the other hand, they are both not profitable yet, and current forecasts do see them remain unprofitable through 2022. We will take a closer look at valuation further down in this article.\nExposure To The High-Growth Chinese EV Market\nBoth companies are located in China, manufacture their cars in China, and primarily sell their vehicles in China. China is one of the biggest EV markets in the world, and the biggest overall automobile market globally. Chinese politicians have ambitious goals of increasing the amount of EVs on the country's roads, partially due to a need to reduce local emissions in order to fight smog troubles. On top of that, China has a rapidly growing middle class, which is, of course, a major tailwind for consumption, which also benefits purchases of EVs and other vehicles.\nIn 2020, 1.3 million EVs were sold in China, which represents about 40% of the global EV market. Forecasts see a 50% increase in EVs being sold in China in 2021, which gets us to an estimated 2.0 million electric vehicles being sold in China this year.\nThe high growth rate in their home market has been a major driver for both NIO's and XPeng's growth. During 2020, NIO sold 44,000 vehicles, but a lot more growth is forecasted for the current year. NIO planned to sell more than 20,000 vehicles in Q1 alone, which equates to an annual pace of more than 80,000, and with further ramp-up expected for Q2-Q4, it is likely that NIO will sell at least 100,000 of its EVs this year.\nXiaopeng Motors, on the other hand,has sold 27,000 vehicles in 2020, albeit its pace already stood at more than 50,000 vehicles annually in Q4. XPeng has guided for at least 12,500 EVs being sold in Q1, and factoring in the seasonality of the business and further ramp-up of production in coming quarters, it is very likely that XPeng will more than double its sales this year.\nLooking at analyst estimates, we see that this year's strong growth that is expected for both companies is not an outlier. Instead, 2022 will be another year during which both NIO and XPeng should grow at a strong pace.\nData by YCharts\nNIO is forecasted to grow its revenues to $5.4 billion this year, with another 59% growth forecasted for 2022, while revenues for 2023 are expected at $12.5 billion (up 45% versus 2022's expected revenues).\nXPeng data is not available at YCharts, but the growth curves look very strong as well -analysts are forecasting that revenues will hit $2.1 billion this year (up 130% versus 2020), and that revenues during 2022 will hit $4.2 billion, up by another 100%.\nAmong the two, NIO is the larger one by both vehicle deliveries and revenues, which is also reflected in its higher valuation. XPeng, however, with its strong expected growth, will also become a much larger player in this space over the next couple of years.\nLooking at market share, we see that NIO sells about one in every 20 EVs in China, while XPeng, due to its smaller size, sells about one in every 35 EVs. Both have bigger peers in their home market China, including Tesla, but at the same time, both NIO and XPeng are growing faster than the market. This should result in ongoing market share gains for both companies over the coming years. Thanks to the ongoing introduction of new models and their aggressive growth plans, it seems likely that both companies will continue to gain share over the coming years, as their above-market growth will be maintained.\nUnique Pros For NIO And XPeng\nWhen looking at unique selling points for these two companies in the crowded EV market, both are trying to set themselves aside from competitors. One of NIO's best arguments for why consumers should buy a NIO-branded car is its battery-swapping technology and battery-as-a-service offering. This service allows consumers to swap their batteries in a couple of minutes, which negates one of the main arguments consumers may still hold against EVs - that it takes too long to recharge a vehicle while on a road trip or similar.\nWith NIO's technology, which has been used millions of times already, this isn't a concern, at least while consumers live and travel in a geographic area with a dense battery-swapping network. Such networks do not exist outside of China yet, but in its home market, NIO can clearly differentiate itself from competitors with BAAS.\nXPeng, on the other hand, is working hard on branding itself as the \"Smart EV\" company. It puts an above-average focus on R&D and is working hard on bringing smart technologies like advanced driver assistance systems to consumers. This strategy is primarily aimed at younger consumers. XPeng has managed to become one of the more popular EV players in China, but its offering is still not as unique as NIO's BAAS.\nChinese EV Market: Tailwinds For Domestic Producers\nTesla is still the largest EV player in the world, and it also sells a large amount of cars in China. Recent news, however, shows why domestic producers may ultimately be favored in China. Tesla is experiencing more scrutiny by the Chinese government and Chinese regulators, which has gotten so far that Tesla vehicles have been prevented from accessing some highways in the country due to safety concerns. Its vehicles have also reportedly been banned from military bases in the country, and the company has also experienced social media campaigns that are very unfavorable towards Tesla.\nIt looks like a theme that has been visible in other industries as well - Chinese regulators and governments favor domestic producers - could hold true in the high-growth EV industry as well. This positions NIO and XPeng well for success in their home countries.\nNIO And XPeng: Valuation\nSince both companies aren't profitable yet, we can't use earnings multiple to decide whether they are undervalued or not. We can, however, look at revenue multiples to deduce whether shares are favorably priced right now.\nData by YCharts\nNIO is trading at 5.6 times 2023's expected revenue, while XPeng is valued at roughly 3 times 2023's expected revenue (data not available on YCharts). This compares favorably versus the current EV king Tesla, which trades at 8 times 2023's expected revenue. On the other hand, however, both NIO and XPeng are of course way more expensive than legacy auto companies with a growing EV presence, including Volkswagen (OTCPK:VWAGY), which trades at less than 1 times its annual sales.\nIs NIO Or XPeng A Buy\nBoth companies enjoy high growth rates, have shown solid Q1 results, and both benefit from China's policy of favoring domestic companies in a range of ways. It can be expected that both NIO Inc and XPeng Inc will continue to do well operationally, and it is also worth mentioning that both companies are significantly less expensive than Tesla, the current leader in the EV space. It is noteworthy that NIO and XPeng are less expensive despite delivering stronger growth rates on a relative basis.\nAt the same time, however, one can't say that either of these companies is inexpensive - they both still trade at large premiums over legacy auto companies.\nDue to the fact that NIO has gotten farther in growing its business so far, combined with the very unique BAAS offering that clearly differentiates it from peers and provides a major reason to use its products, I see it as a more favorable choice than XPeng generally. I believe this warrants a premium versus XPeng, which isn't as uniquely positioned and could experience more growing pains in coming years due to its smaller size.\nNevertheless, due to valuation, I don't think NIO's shares are a great buy right here, even though I would prefer them over those of XPeng (and I would prefer both over those of Tesla). Investors may want to wait for more favorable prices before entering or expanding a position if the current valuation gives them a pause - both when it comes to these two companies, as well as when other EV companies are considered.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":280,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9985062115,"gmtCreate":1667271235437,"gmtModify":1676537889007,"author":{"id":"3580076090108797","authorId":"3580076090108797","name":"Generalcarh","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/810d09784518dd2cf3a22ee58e8e060e","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3580076090108797","authorIdStr":"3580076090108797"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"It is interesting that a company CFO does stock buy back by himself.","listText":"It is interesting that a company CFO does stock buy back by himself.","text":"It is interesting that a company CFO does stock buy back by himself.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9985062115","repostId":"1141395469","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":276,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9941337260,"gmtCreate":1679972727450,"gmtModify":1679972731647,"author":{"id":"3580076090108797","authorId":"3580076090108797","name":"Generalcarh","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/810d09784518dd2cf3a22ee58e8e060e","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3580076090108797","authorIdStr":"3580076090108797"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"We should short it","listText":"We should short it","text":"We should short it","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9941337260","repostId":"2322477351","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2322477351","pubTimestamp":1679960400,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2322477351?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2023-03-28 07:40","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Schwab’s $7 Trillion Empire Built on Low Rates Is Showing Cracks","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2322477351","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"Company faces pressure from bond losses and rising cash yieldsExecutives say business is misundersto","content":"<html><head></head><body><ul><li>Company faces pressure from bond losses and rising cash yields</li><li>Executives say business is misunderstood, has enough liquidity</li></ul><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6af18f8dfc5e6ceab8bf8737bc94d234\" tg-width=\"800\" tg-height=\"533\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>(Bloomberg) -- On the surface, Charles Schwab Corp. being swept up in the worst US banking crisis since 2008 makes little sense.</p><p>The firm, a half-century mainstay in the brokerage industry, isn’t overexposed to crypto like <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SI\">Silvergate Capital</a> and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SBNYP\">Signature Bank</a>, nor to startups and venture capital, which felled Silicon Valley Bank. Fewer than 20% of Schwab’s depositors exceed the FDIC’s $250,000 insurance cap, compared with about 90% at SVB. And with 34 million accounts, a phalanx of financial advisers and more than $7 trillion of assets across all of its businesses, it towers over regional institutions.</p><p>Yet the questions around Schwab won’t go away.</p><p>Rather, as the crisis drags on, investors are starting to unearth risks that have been hiding in plain sight. Unrealized losses on the Westlake, Texas-based firm’s balance sheet, loaded with long-dated bonds, ballooned to more than $29 billion last year. At the same time, higher interest rates are encouraging customers to move their cash out of certain accounts that underpin Schwab’s business and bolster its bottom line.</p><p>It’s another indication that the Federal Reserve’s rapid policy tightening caught the financial world flat-footed after decades of declining rates. Schwab shares have lost more than a quarter of their value since March 8, with some Wall Street analysts expecting earnings to suffer.</p><p>“In hindsight, they arguably could have had more prudent investment choices,” said Morningstar analyst Michael Wong.</p><p>Chief Executive Officer Walt Bettinger and the brokerage’s founder and namesake, billionaire Charles Schwab, have said the firm is healthy and prepared to withstand the broader turmoil.</p><p>The business is “misunderstood,” and it’s “misleading” to focus on paper losses, which the company may never have to incur, they said last week in a statement.</p><p>“There would be a sufficient amount of liquidity right there to cover if 100% of our bank’s deposits ran off,” Bettinger told the Wall Street Journal in an interview published Thursday, adding that the firm could borrow from the Federal Home Loan Bank and issue certificates of deposit to address any funding shortfall.</p><p>Through a representative, Bettinger declined to comment for this story. A Schwab spokesperson declined to comment beyond the Thursday statement.</p><p>The broader crisis showed signs of easing on Monday, after First Citizens BancShares Inc. agreed to buy SVB, buoying shares of financial firms including Schwab, which was up 3.1% at 2:29 p.m. in New York. The stock is still down 42% from its peak in February 2022, a month before the Fed started raising interest rates.</p><h2>Unusual Operation</h2><p>Schwab is unusual among peers. It operates one of the largest US banks, grafted on to the biggest publicly traded brokerage. Both divisions are sensitive to interest-rate fluctuations.</p><p>Like SVB, Schwab gobbled up longer-dated bonds at low yields in 2020 and 2021. That meant paper losses mounted in a short period as the Fed began boosting rates to stamp out inflation.</p><p>Three years ago, Schwab’s main bank had no unrealized losses on long-term debt that it planned to hold until maturity. By last March, the firm had more than $5 billion of such paper losses — a figure that climbed to more than $13 billion at year-end.</p><p>It shifted $189 billion of agency mortgage-backed securities from “available-for-sale” to “held-to-maturity” on its balance sheet last year, a move that effectively shields those unrealized losses from impacting stockholder equity.</p><p>“They basically saw higher interest rates coming,” Stephen Ryan, an accounting professor at New York University’s Stern School of Business, said in a phone interview. “They didn’t know how long they would last or how big they would be, but they protected the equity by making the transfer.”</p><p>The rules governing such balance sheet moves are stringent. It means Schwab plans to hold more than $150 billion worth of debt to maturity with a weighted-average yield of 1.74%. The lion’s share of the securities — $114 billion at the end of 2022 — won’t mature for more than a decade.</p><p>The benchmark 10-year Treasury yield now: 3.5%.</p><h2>Cash Business</h2><p>Schwab’s other headache from higher interest rates stems from cash.</p><p>At the root of Schwab’s income is idle client money. The firm “sweeps” cash deposits from brokerage accounts to its bank, where it can reinvest in higher-yielding products. The difference between what Schwab earns and what it pays out in interest to customers is its net interest income, among the most important metrics for a bank.</p><p>Net interest income accounted for 51% of Schwab’s total net revenue last year.</p><p>“Schwab’s counting on inertia,” said Allan Roth, founder of Wealth Logic, a financial-planning firm.</p><p>After a year of rapidly rising rates, there’s greater incentive to avoid being stagnant with cash. While many money-market funds are paying more than 4% interest, Schwab’s sweep accounts offer just 0.45%.</p><p>While it’s an open question just how much money customers could move away from its sweep vehicles, Schwab’s management acknowledged this behavior picked up last year.</p><p>“As a result of rapidly increasing short-term interest rates in 2022, the company saw an increase in the pace at which clients moved certain cash balances” into higher-yielding alternatives, Schwab said in its annual report. “As these outflows have continued, they have outpaced excess cash on hand and cash generated by maturities and pay-downs on our investment portfolios.”</p><p>In their statement, Bettinger and Schwab wrote that “client deposits may move, but they are not leaving the firm.”</p><h2>FHLB Borrowing</h2><p>To plug the gap, the brokerage’s banking units borrowed $12.4 billion from the FHLB system through the end of 2022, and had the capacity to borrow $68.6 billion, according to an annual report filed with regulators.</p><p>Schwab borrowed an additional $13 billion from the FHLB so far this year, the filing showed.</p><p>Analysts have been weighing these factors, with Barclays Plc and Morningstar lowering their price targets for Schwab shares in recent weeks.</p><p>Bettinger and Schwab said that the firm’s long history and conservatism will help customers navigate the current cycle, as they have for more than 50 years.</p><p>“We remain confident in our client-centric approach, the performance of our business, and the long-term stability of our company,” they wrote in last week’s statement. “We are different than other banks.”</p><p>--With assistance from Silla Brush, Miles Weiss and Noah Buhayar.</p></body></html>","source":"yahoofinance","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Schwab’s $7 Trillion Empire Built on Low Rates Is Showing Cracks</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSchwab’s $7 Trillion Empire Built on Low Rates Is Showing Cracks\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2023-03-28 07:40 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/schwab-7-trillion-empire-built-183320482.html><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Company faces pressure from bond losses and rising cash yieldsExecutives say business is misunderstood, has enough liquidity(Bloomberg) -- On the surface, Charles Schwab Corp. being swept up in the ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/schwab-7-trillion-empire-built-183320482.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"LU1861217088.USD":"贝莱德金融科技A2","BK4581":"高盛持仓","LU2264538146.SGD":"Fullerton Lux Funds - Global Absolute Alpha A Acc SGD","SCHW":"嘉信理财","LU0011850046.USD":"贝莱德全球长线股票 A2 USD","LU0106831901.USD":"贝莱德世界金融基金A2","LU0648001328.SGD":"Natixis Harris Associates US Equity RA SGD","LU1668664300.SGD":"Blackrock World Financials A2 SGD-H","BK4504":"桥水持仓","LU1861220207.SGD":"Blackrock FinTech A2 SGD-H","LU0130102774.USD":"Natixis Harris Associates US Equity RA USD","LU1363072403.SGD":"Fidelity Global Financial Services A-ACC-SGD","BK4127":"投资银行业与经纪业","LU1064131342.USD":"Fullerton Lux Funds - Global Absolute Alpha A Acc USD","SG9999001077.SGD":"United International Growth Fund SGD","LU1201861249.SGD":"Natixis Harris Associates US Equity PA SGD-H","BK4585":"ETF&股票定投概念","LU0980610538.SGD":"Natixis Harris Associates US Equity RA SGD-H","SG9999014021.USD":"UNITED GLOBAL DURABLE EQUITIES (USDHDG) ACC","LU1988902786.USD":"FULLERTON LUX FUNDS GLOBAL ABSOLUTE ALPHA \"I\" (USD) ACC","BK4588":"碎股","LU0971096721.USD":"富达环球金融服务 A","SG9999014039.USD":"UNITED GLOBAL DURABLE EQUITIES (USDHDG) INC","SG9999014005.SGD":"United Global Durable Equities Fund Acc SGD","BK4589":"SVB概念","SG9999014013.SGD":"United Global Durable Equities Fund Dis SGD"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/schwab-7-trillion-empire-built-183320482.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5f26f4a48f9cb3e29be4d71d3ba8c038","article_id":"2322477351","content_text":"Company faces pressure from bond losses and rising cash yieldsExecutives say business is misunderstood, has enough liquidity(Bloomberg) -- On the surface, Charles Schwab Corp. being swept up in the worst US banking crisis since 2008 makes little sense.The firm, a half-century mainstay in the brokerage industry, isn’t overexposed to crypto like Silvergate Capital and Signature Bank, nor to startups and venture capital, which felled Silicon Valley Bank. Fewer than 20% of Schwab’s depositors exceed the FDIC’s $250,000 insurance cap, compared with about 90% at SVB. And with 34 million accounts, a phalanx of financial advisers and more than $7 trillion of assets across all of its businesses, it towers over regional institutions.Yet the questions around Schwab won’t go away.Rather, as the crisis drags on, investors are starting to unearth risks that have been hiding in plain sight. Unrealized losses on the Westlake, Texas-based firm’s balance sheet, loaded with long-dated bonds, ballooned to more than $29 billion last year. At the same time, higher interest rates are encouraging customers to move their cash out of certain accounts that underpin Schwab’s business and bolster its bottom line.It’s another indication that the Federal Reserve’s rapid policy tightening caught the financial world flat-footed after decades of declining rates. Schwab shares have lost more than a quarter of their value since March 8, with some Wall Street analysts expecting earnings to suffer.“In hindsight, they arguably could have had more prudent investment choices,” said Morningstar analyst Michael Wong.Chief Executive Officer Walt Bettinger and the brokerage’s founder and namesake, billionaire Charles Schwab, have said the firm is healthy and prepared to withstand the broader turmoil.The business is “misunderstood,” and it’s “misleading” to focus on paper losses, which the company may never have to incur, they said last week in a statement.“There would be a sufficient amount of liquidity right there to cover if 100% of our bank’s deposits ran off,” Bettinger told the Wall Street Journal in an interview published Thursday, adding that the firm could borrow from the Federal Home Loan Bank and issue certificates of deposit to address any funding shortfall.Through a representative, Bettinger declined to comment for this story. A Schwab spokesperson declined to comment beyond the Thursday statement.The broader crisis showed signs of easing on Monday, after First Citizens BancShares Inc. agreed to buy SVB, buoying shares of financial firms including Schwab, which was up 3.1% at 2:29 p.m. in New York. The stock is still down 42% from its peak in February 2022, a month before the Fed started raising interest rates.Unusual OperationSchwab is unusual among peers. It operates one of the largest US banks, grafted on to the biggest publicly traded brokerage. Both divisions are sensitive to interest-rate fluctuations.Like SVB, Schwab gobbled up longer-dated bonds at low yields in 2020 and 2021. That meant paper losses mounted in a short period as the Fed began boosting rates to stamp out inflation.Three years ago, Schwab’s main bank had no unrealized losses on long-term debt that it planned to hold until maturity. By last March, the firm had more than $5 billion of such paper losses — a figure that climbed to more than $13 billion at year-end.It shifted $189 billion of agency mortgage-backed securities from “available-for-sale” to “held-to-maturity” on its balance sheet last year, a move that effectively shields those unrealized losses from impacting stockholder equity.“They basically saw higher interest rates coming,” Stephen Ryan, an accounting professor at New York University’s Stern School of Business, said in a phone interview. “They didn’t know how long they would last or how big they would be, but they protected the equity by making the transfer.”The rules governing such balance sheet moves are stringent. It means Schwab plans to hold more than $150 billion worth of debt to maturity with a weighted-average yield of 1.74%. The lion’s share of the securities — $114 billion at the end of 2022 — won’t mature for more than a decade.The benchmark 10-year Treasury yield now: 3.5%.Cash BusinessSchwab’s other headache from higher interest rates stems from cash.At the root of Schwab’s income is idle client money. The firm “sweeps” cash deposits from brokerage accounts to its bank, where it can reinvest in higher-yielding products. The difference between what Schwab earns and what it pays out in interest to customers is its net interest income, among the most important metrics for a bank.Net interest income accounted for 51% of Schwab’s total net revenue last year.“Schwab’s counting on inertia,” said Allan Roth, founder of Wealth Logic, a financial-planning firm.After a year of rapidly rising rates, there’s greater incentive to avoid being stagnant with cash. While many money-market funds are paying more than 4% interest, Schwab’s sweep accounts offer just 0.45%.While it’s an open question just how much money customers could move away from its sweep vehicles, Schwab’s management acknowledged this behavior picked up last year.“As a result of rapidly increasing short-term interest rates in 2022, the company saw an increase in the pace at which clients moved certain cash balances” into higher-yielding alternatives, Schwab said in its annual report. “As these outflows have continued, they have outpaced excess cash on hand and cash generated by maturities and pay-downs on our investment portfolios.”In their statement, Bettinger and Schwab wrote that “client deposits may move, but they are not leaving the firm.”FHLB BorrowingTo plug the gap, the brokerage’s banking units borrowed $12.4 billion from the FHLB system through the end of 2022, and had the capacity to borrow $68.6 billion, according to an annual report filed with regulators.Schwab borrowed an additional $13 billion from the FHLB so far this year, the filing showed.Analysts have been weighing these factors, with Barclays Plc and Morningstar lowering their price targets for Schwab shares in recent weeks.Bettinger and Schwab said that the firm’s long history and conservatism will help customers navigate the current cycle, as they have for more than 50 years.“We remain confident in our client-centric approach, the performance of our business, and the long-term stability of our company,” they wrote in last week’s statement. “We are different than other banks.”--With assistance from Silla Brush, Miles Weiss and Noah Buhayar.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":278,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9952643632,"gmtCreate":1674706521727,"gmtModify":1676538954270,"author":{"id":"3580076090108797","authorId":"3580076090108797","name":"Generalcarh","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/810d09784518dd2cf3a22ee58e8e060e","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3580076090108797","authorIdStr":"3580076090108797"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/C6L.SI\">$SINGAPORE AIRLINES LTD(C6L.SI)$&nbsp;</a>","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/C6L.SI\">$SINGAPORE AIRLINES LTD(C6L.SI)$&nbsp;</a>","text":"$SINGAPORE AIRLINES LTD(C6L.SI)$","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/3eeb6aebd244e08dced4df0abe877bcd","width":"828","height":"1632"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9952643632","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":228,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":899192450,"gmtCreate":1628167156170,"gmtModify":1703502409912,"author":{"id":"3580076090108797","authorId":"3580076090108797","name":"Generalcarh","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/810d09784518dd2cf3a22ee58e8e060e","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3580076090108797","authorIdStr":"3580076090108797"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/S20.SI\">$STRAITS TRADING CO. LTD(S20.SI)$</a>[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/S20.SI\">$STRAITS TRADING CO. LTD(S20.SI)$</a>[Miser]&nbsp;[Miser]&nbsp;","text":"$STRAITS TRADING CO. LTD(S20.SI)$[Miser] [Miser]","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/981869ff4cf43a754078fee4dfc8b014","width":"828","height":"1434"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/899192450","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":245,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}