+Follow
SEAHJH
No personal profile
9
Follow
1
Followers
0
Topic
0
Badge
Posts
Hot
SEAHJH
2021-12-24
Yes
Sorry, the original content has been removed
SEAHJH
2021-09-06
Woahhh
Sorry, the original content has been removed
SEAHJH
2021-09-06
Awesome Lah
NIO: The Slowdown Is Only Temporary
SEAHJH
2021-09-01
Good
Sorry, the original content has been removed
SEAHJH
2021-09-01
?
Sorry, the original content has been removed
Go to Tiger App to see more news
{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"userPageInfo":{"id":"3586302488708678","uuid":"3586302488708678","gmtCreate":1623210021069,"gmtModify":1623210021069,"name":"SEAHJH","pinyin":"seahjh","introduction":"","introductionEn":null,"signature":"","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":1,"headSize":9,"tweetSize":5,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":1,"name":"萌萌虎","nameTw":"萌萌虎","represent":"呱呱坠地","factor":"评论帖子3次或发布1条主帖（非转发）","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":"success","userBadges":[{"badgeId":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493-2","templateUuid":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493","name":"Senior Tiger","description":"Join the tiger community for 1000 days","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0063fb68ea29c9ae6858c58630e182d5","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/96c699a93be4214d4b49aea6a5a5d1a4","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/35b0e542a9ff77046ed69ef602bc105d","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2024.03.05","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be-1","templateUuid":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be","name":"Elite Trader","description":"Total number of securities or futures transactions reached 30","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ab0f87127c854ce3191a752d57b46edc","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c9835ce48b8c8743566d344ac7a7ba8c","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76754b53ce7a90019f132c1d2fbc698f","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.29","exceedPercentage":"60.69%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100},{"badgeId":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789-1","templateUuid":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789","name":"Knowledgeable Investor","description":"Traded more than 10 stocks","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e74cc24115c4fbae6154ec1b1041bf47","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d48265cbfd97c57f9048db29f22227b0","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76c6d6898b073c77e1c537ebe9ac1c57","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1102},{"badgeId":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84-1","templateUuid":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84","name":"Real Trader","description":"Completed a transaction","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":4,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":null,"starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"post","tweets":[{"id":9000764695,"gmtCreate":1640312193137,"gmtModify":1676533515951,"author":{"id":"3586302488708678","authorId":"3586302488708678","name":"SEAHJH","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3586302488708678","authorIdStr":"3586302488708678"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Yes ","listText":"Yes ","text":"Yes","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9000764695","repostId":"1168865278","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":343,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":817149995,"gmtCreate":1630923750517,"gmtModify":1676530421467,"author":{"id":"3586302488708678","authorId":"3586302488708678","name":"SEAHJH","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3586302488708678","authorIdStr":"3586302488708678"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Woahhh","listText":"Woahhh","text":"Woahhh","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/817149995","repostId":"1193251876","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":212,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":817140569,"gmtCreate":1630923713551,"gmtModify":1676530421459,"author":{"id":"3586302488708678","authorId":"3586302488708678","name":"SEAHJH","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3586302488708678","authorIdStr":"3586302488708678"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Awesome Lah","listText":"Awesome Lah","text":"Awesome Lah","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/817140569","repostId":"1120348716","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1120348716","pubTimestamp":1630918145,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1120348716?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-09-06 16:49","market":"us","language":"en","title":"NIO: The Slowdown Is Only Temporary","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1120348716","media":"seekingalpha","summary":"Summary\n\nNIO’s delivery numbers for August showed only year over year growth of 48.3%.\nNIO’s ES6 and","content":"<p><b>Summary</b></p>\n<ul>\n <li>NIO’s delivery numbers for August showed only year over year growth of 48.3%.</li>\n <li>NIO’s ES6 and EC6 production are affected by the chip supply shortage and the EV maker lowered the delivery forecast for the third-quarter.</li>\n <li>Delivery growth rates should snap back in Q4'21.</li>\n</ul>\n<p>Chinese electric vehicle maker <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NIO\">NIO Inc.</a> released worse than expected delivery numbers for August and lowered delivery guidance for Q3’21. Despite the revision, NIO will play an important role in EV adoption worldwide and the stock is facing great prospects long term.</p>\n<p><b>Slowdown in delivery growth is only temporary</b></p>\n<p>NIO has been used to reporting year over year delivery growth rates surpassing 100%. In July, the Chinese maker of electric sport utility vehicles, delivered close to 8,000 ES6s, ES8s and EC6s, with total cumulative deliveries growing 124.5% year over year. Rivals like <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LI\">Li Auto</a> (LI) and XPeng (XPEV) delivered more than 8,000 vehicles and generated all-time delivery records each in July. With rival EV makers catching up to NIO regarding production and deliveries, the market eagerly expected the presentation of NIO’s August delivery numbers… which disappointed, to say the least.</p>\n<p>NIO’s August delivery numbers took an unexpected hit from the chip shortage which continues to hamper factory output for automobile companies around the world. NIO delivered only5,880 vehiclesin August 2021, showing a growth rate of 48.3%, which is meager for EV makers. Compared to July, NIO’s delivery growth contracted 26% month over month, a sign that the chip supply shortage is having a larger than expected impact on NIO’s factory output and delivery capacity. In August, NIO delivered 2,342 ES6s, 1,800 EC6s and 1,738 ES8s. Because the supply crunch continues to hit NIO’s production, the EV maker lowered its Q3’21 delivery forecast from 23,000 to 25,000 vehicles to a lower level of 22,500 to 23,500. Based on the new guidance, NIO views it deliveries of 7,500 to 7,833 vehicles per month as realistic… which means delivery growth rates for the entire third-quarter will not be very strong.</p>\n<p>To add insult to injury, both Li Auto and XPeng delivered better growth rates for the month of August. Li Auto, which produces the Li ONE sport utility vehicle, delivered9,433 vehicleslast month, showing a growth rate of 248.0%. Li Auto also grew deliveries month over month, at a rate of 9.8%. XPeng also did well, and better than NIO. The maker of the P7 smart sedan and the G3 smart compact sport utility vehicle, delivered a total of7,214 electric vehicleslast month, representing a 172.0% year over year growth rate. However, XPeng also experienced a month over month drop in deliveries, but the drop was much less significant than in NIO’s case, 10.3%.</p>\n<p>Because of NIO’s new delivery guidance, my delivery forecast table for FY 2021 is now also updated. NIO said that the chip supply shortage predominantly affects the ES6 and the EC6 the most, the ES6 being NIO’s top-selling SUV on a volume basis. Since NIO’s factory output will continue to be hampered in Q3’21 - and production risks for Q4’21 have also increased - NIO is unlikely to achieve the 100,000 vehicle delivery milestone this year. I now estimate, with new information available, NIO to deliver a total of 90,206 EVs in FY 202, but my projections still assume a recovery in production and delivery rates in Q4’21. If the supply shortage spills over into the fourth-quarter, my delivery projections for Q4’21 are subject to revision.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9191b96947dee5ac658f631af148d36b\" tg-width=\"613\" tg-height=\"304\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><i>(Source: Author Projections)</i></p>\n<p>Although NIO’s delivery growth has begun to slow down, NIO is not at fault here. The semiconductor supply shortage affects EV and non-EV makers around the world as production of smart vehicles relies heavily on technology and computer chips. The market shrugged off news about a slowdown in NIO’s delivery growth and shares of NIO advanced above $40 again yesterday.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f33a8172b498cd0601d3094e4b7536b1\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"417\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">I expect NIO’s production and delivery rate to show strong signs of recovery in the fourth-quarter, although a full return to normal production may not occur before the first or second quarter of next year.</p>\n<p><b>One year from now, NIO should have a higher valuation</b></p>\n<p>NIO is no longer as cheap as it was last year and the EV maker requires investors to pay a higher sales multiplier factor for its growth. But this was also always true for Tesla (TSLA) which has never been cheap and Tesla’s shares, despite a high valuation, reached new highs steadily over the years. A year from now, the semiconductor supply shortage and slowdown in Q3’21 delivery growth will likely be nothing more than just a blip in NIO’s long growth story.</p>\n<p>NIO is expected togrow revenues 140%and may grow revenues even faster if NIO achieves mass market appeal with its SUVs and brings new sedan products to market (the ET7 sedan is expected to launch at the beginning of next year). NIO is still very much at the beginning of its growth and the risk profile, despite a P-S ratio of 7.1, is skewed to the upside.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/95ca878a48af8b28583174a399278a6b\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"433\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><b>Risks with NIO</b></p>\n<p>The biggest risk for NIO is that EV delivery growth slows down permanently, the risk of which is likely low. Other car brands also felt the pinch from the chip supply crunch this year but the industry will move past this. Short term, however, a semiconductor shortage that gets worse before it gets better is a big risk that investors in EV maker NIO need to know about. My projections for total FY 2021 deliveries, especially the implied production rebound in Q4’21, may still be too optimistic. Longer term, a slowdown in NIO’s revenue growth, due to intensifying competition, poses a challenge.</p>\n<p><b>Final thoughts</b></p>\n<p>NIO’s drop in delivery growth is only temporary. How long this “temporary” will last is up for discussion, but based on NIO’s new guidance, the slowdown will last at least through the entire third-quarter. Once the chip supply shortage eases - which I expect to be the case in Q1’22 - NIO’s production and delivery should snap back and progress to new records. In the meantime, any major dip in NIO’s market value may be considered a buying opportunity.</p>","source":"seekingalpha","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>NIO: The Slowdown Is Only Temporary</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nNIO: The Slowdown Is Only Temporary\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-09-06 16:49 GMT+8 <a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4453441-nio-the-slowdown-is-only-temporary><strong>seekingalpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Summary\n\nNIO’s delivery numbers for August showed only year over year growth of 48.3%.\nNIO’s ES6 and EC6 production are affected by the chip supply shortage and the EV maker lowered the delivery ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4453441-nio-the-slowdown-is-only-temporary\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NIO":"蔚来"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4453441-nio-the-slowdown-is-only-temporary","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5a36db9d73b4222bc376d24ccc48c8a4","article_id":"1120348716","content_text":"Summary\n\nNIO’s delivery numbers for August showed only year over year growth of 48.3%.\nNIO’s ES6 and EC6 production are affected by the chip supply shortage and the EV maker lowered the delivery forecast for the third-quarter.\nDelivery growth rates should snap back in Q4'21.\n\nChinese electric vehicle maker NIO Inc. released worse than expected delivery numbers for August and lowered delivery guidance for Q3’21. Despite the revision, NIO will play an important role in EV adoption worldwide and the stock is facing great prospects long term.\nSlowdown in delivery growth is only temporary\nNIO has been used to reporting year over year delivery growth rates surpassing 100%. In July, the Chinese maker of electric sport utility vehicles, delivered close to 8,000 ES6s, ES8s and EC6s, with total cumulative deliveries growing 124.5% year over year. Rivals like Li Auto (LI) and XPeng (XPEV) delivered more than 8,000 vehicles and generated all-time delivery records each in July. With rival EV makers catching up to NIO regarding production and deliveries, the market eagerly expected the presentation of NIO’s August delivery numbers… which disappointed, to say the least.\nNIO’s August delivery numbers took an unexpected hit from the chip shortage which continues to hamper factory output for automobile companies around the world. NIO delivered only5,880 vehiclesin August 2021, showing a growth rate of 48.3%, which is meager for EV makers. Compared to July, NIO’s delivery growth contracted 26% month over month, a sign that the chip supply shortage is having a larger than expected impact on NIO’s factory output and delivery capacity. In August, NIO delivered 2,342 ES6s, 1,800 EC6s and 1,738 ES8s. Because the supply crunch continues to hit NIO’s production, the EV maker lowered its Q3’21 delivery forecast from 23,000 to 25,000 vehicles to a lower level of 22,500 to 23,500. Based on the new guidance, NIO views it deliveries of 7,500 to 7,833 vehicles per month as realistic… which means delivery growth rates for the entire third-quarter will not be very strong.\nTo add insult to injury, both Li Auto and XPeng delivered better growth rates for the month of August. Li Auto, which produces the Li ONE sport utility vehicle, delivered9,433 vehicleslast month, showing a growth rate of 248.0%. Li Auto also grew deliveries month over month, at a rate of 9.8%. XPeng also did well, and better than NIO. The maker of the P7 smart sedan and the G3 smart compact sport utility vehicle, delivered a total of7,214 electric vehicleslast month, representing a 172.0% year over year growth rate. However, XPeng also experienced a month over month drop in deliveries, but the drop was much less significant than in NIO’s case, 10.3%.\nBecause of NIO’s new delivery guidance, my delivery forecast table for FY 2021 is now also updated. NIO said that the chip supply shortage predominantly affects the ES6 and the EC6 the most, the ES6 being NIO’s top-selling SUV on a volume basis. Since NIO’s factory output will continue to be hampered in Q3’21 - and production risks for Q4’21 have also increased - NIO is unlikely to achieve the 100,000 vehicle delivery milestone this year. I now estimate, with new information available, NIO to deliver a total of 90,206 EVs in FY 202, but my projections still assume a recovery in production and delivery rates in Q4’21. If the supply shortage spills over into the fourth-quarter, my delivery projections for Q4’21 are subject to revision.\n(Source: Author Projections)\nAlthough NIO’s delivery growth has begun to slow down, NIO is not at fault here. The semiconductor supply shortage affects EV and non-EV makers around the world as production of smart vehicles relies heavily on technology and computer chips. The market shrugged off news about a slowdown in NIO’s delivery growth and shares of NIO advanced above $40 again yesterday.\nI expect NIO’s production and delivery rate to show strong signs of recovery in the fourth-quarter, although a full return to normal production may not occur before the first or second quarter of next year.\nOne year from now, NIO should have a higher valuation\nNIO is no longer as cheap as it was last year and the EV maker requires investors to pay a higher sales multiplier factor for its growth. But this was also always true for Tesla (TSLA) which has never been cheap and Tesla’s shares, despite a high valuation, reached new highs steadily over the years. A year from now, the semiconductor supply shortage and slowdown in Q3’21 delivery growth will likely be nothing more than just a blip in NIO’s long growth story.\nNIO is expected togrow revenues 140%and may grow revenues even faster if NIO achieves mass market appeal with its SUVs and brings new sedan products to market (the ET7 sedan is expected to launch at the beginning of next year). NIO is still very much at the beginning of its growth and the risk profile, despite a P-S ratio of 7.1, is skewed to the upside.\nRisks with NIO\nThe biggest risk for NIO is that EV delivery growth slows down permanently, the risk of which is likely low. Other car brands also felt the pinch from the chip supply crunch this year but the industry will move past this. Short term, however, a semiconductor shortage that gets worse before it gets better is a big risk that investors in EV maker NIO need to know about. My projections for total FY 2021 deliveries, especially the implied production rebound in Q4’21, may still be too optimistic. Longer term, a slowdown in NIO’s revenue growth, due to intensifying competition, poses a challenge.\nFinal thoughts\nNIO’s drop in delivery growth is only temporary. How long this “temporary” will last is up for discussion, but based on NIO’s new guidance, the slowdown will last at least through the entire third-quarter. Once the chip supply shortage eases - which I expect to be the case in Q1’22 - NIO’s production and delivery should snap back and progress to new records. In the meantime, any major dip in NIO’s market value may be considered a buying opportunity.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":295,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":816407037,"gmtCreate":1630510827529,"gmtModify":1676530326796,"author":{"id":"3586302488708678","authorId":"3586302488708678","name":"SEAHJH","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3586302488708678","authorIdStr":"3586302488708678"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/816407037","repostId":"1136463591","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":245,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":816405826,"gmtCreate":1630510774965,"gmtModify":1676530326754,"author":{"id":"3586302488708678","authorId":"3586302488708678","name":"SEAHJH","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3586302488708678","authorIdStr":"3586302488708678"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"?","listText":"?","text":"?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/816405826","repostId":"1136463591","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":207,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":817149995,"gmtCreate":1630923750517,"gmtModify":1676530421467,"author":{"id":"3586302488708678","authorId":"3586302488708678","name":"SEAHJH","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3586302488708678","authorIdStr":"3586302488708678"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Woahhh","listText":"Woahhh","text":"Woahhh","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/817149995","repostId":"1193251876","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1193251876","pubTimestamp":1630912824,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1193251876?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-09-06 15:20","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple is playing a shell game with its App Store changes, but that can’t last forever","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1193251876","media":"MarketWatch","summary":"Small, confusing changes are unlikely to satisfy app developers and regulators who want major change","content":"<blockquote>\n <b>Small, confusing changes are unlikely to satisfy app developers and regulators who want major changes to a structure that pays app-store owners up to 30% of all revenue and is a major profit center for Apple.</b>\n</blockquote>\n<p>Apple Inc. has engaged in a flurry of deal making in hopes of quelling concerns about anticompetitive practices with its popular App Store, but the barrage of confusing — and in some cases miniscule — changes have a commonality: They keep the core of Apple’s nearly $70 billion cash cow intact.</p>\n<p>Apple AAPL,+0.42% in the past couple weeks has announced changes in the App Store as part of a settlement with a regulatory agencies in Japan and, separately, as part of a class action lawsuit settlement. The changes arrive as Apple’s App Store faces major scrutiny by regulators in the U.S. and worldwide, while waiting for a judge’s ruling in the landmark antitrust case filed against it by “Fortnite” maker Epic games Inc.</p>\n<p>The core problem with the App Store is that it charges developers high commissions for in-app purchases, up to 30%, while not allowing them to offer alternatives that could avoid that charge. The practice has made the App Store an increasingly huge and important business for Apple, especially as the growth of the iPhone has slowed. For fiscal 2020, Apple’s services business, of which the App Store is the core revenue generator, reported annual sales of $54 billion with growth of 16.2%, while iPhone sales fell 3% on an annual basis.</p>\n<p>Profit from Apple’s app fees are estimated to be stunning, according to one economist who testified during the Epic trial. He estimated the App Store has generated profit margins of 75% and 78%, respectively, in the last two years. Apple does not publicly disclose financial results of the App Store specifically.</p>\n<p>The most important concession came late Wednesday, when Apple said it would allow developers such as Netflix Inc. NFLX,+0.34% and Spotify Technology SA SPOT,-1.96% to provide their customers a link to their websites within the app that will allow the users to pay for their services outside of the App Store, sidestepping fees. The fine print shows how limited this change is, however: It only applies to “reader” apps that provide subscription content such as news, books, music and video, as well as content that users have previously purchased elsewhere.</p>\n<p>Spotify Chief Executive Daniel Ek tweeted on Thursday that Apple’s agreement may be a “step in the right direction,” but it does not solve the problem.</p>\n<p>“Our goal is to restore competition once and for all, not one arbitrary, self-serving step at a time,” Ek said on Twitter.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6a28ef0362c75cbe41db83200186ac3b\" tg-width=\"501\" tg-height=\"707\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">Ek made that comment even as shares of Spotify jumped 6% on Thursday, as investors hoped to see the unprofitable music-streaming company get a little closer to black ink on the blotter. For an example that shows the uneven treatment that Ek decries, though, take a look at Match Group Inc. MTCH,+0.73%</p>\n<p>It appears unlikely that Match’s apps, which offer subscriptions to dating services such as Tinder, will fit under the “reader” app carve-out, though an Apple spokesman declined to comment on any specific apps and Match Group officials did not respond to a request for comment. Yet it is one of the main faces of the movement against app stores after an executive testified at a U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on the anticompetitive nature of Apple’s App Store and Alphabet Inc.’s GOOG GOOGL Google Play store that Match pays half a billion dollars in fees to the two tech companies every year.</p>\n<p>Likewise, videogames are not mentioned in any of the settlements, as Apple waits to hear what Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rodgers has to say about its battle with Epic. That means the money will definitely continue to flow in, as videogames are believed to generate the most sales in the App Store.</p>\n<p><b>Epic vs. Apple: The (predicted) verdict is in</b></p>\n<p>Both of these settlements offer very little change to the App Store and just add more confusion. Instead of just simply cutting their commission, Apple has new convoluted rules that are unlikely to lead to lower costs for most developers, who still have to jump through many hoops to get an app approved by the App Store and have little chance of convincing customers to jump through hoops of their own to avoid the app maker paying Apple’s fee.</p>\n<p>“The changes were made to settle a developer lawsuit and, similar to other recent changes, the impact will be relatively immaterial,” said Amit Daryanani, an analyst with Evercore ISI, in a note to clients. “We do not think many customers will choose to follow instructions in the email and re-enter payment information, as they do not receive any benefit from helping the developer avoid Apple’s fees.”</p>\n<p>The issue for Apple is that governments around the world are likely to see through this gambit and aim straight for the heart of the App Store’s revenue model. In South Korea, legislators passed a bill this week requiring both Apple and Google to allow alternate payment systems in apps, the first law of its kind in the world. A similarly targeted bill, called the Open App Markets Act, was introduced in the U.S. last month by three senators.</p>\n<p>While Tim Cook and the rest of the executives at Apple likely hope that this shell game of small, confusing concessions will be enough to stave off lawmakers, particularly in their home country, it is unlikely that app stores will escape from the current scrutiny without more major changes.</p>\n<p>“Over time, the fees are going to be pressured and the writing is on the wall,” said Ives of Wedbush Securities. “Apple will continue to make some olive branch moves, which puts them in good standing, given the pressure they are seeing…but I think they are going to aggressively defend their moat.”</p>\n<p>The fallout from this push will have ripple effects all over tech, and could lead to big changes for consumers as well — Spotify, for instance, said it raised prices from $9.99 to $12.99 largely to cover its app store fees. Major changes, however, could eventually cut more deeply into one of Apple’s biggest cash cows and slowly dig away at the moat surrounding Apple’s castle.</p>","source":"market_watch","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple is playing a shell game with its App Store changes, but that can’t last forever </title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple is playing a shell game with its App Store changes, but that can’t last forever \n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-09-06 15:20 GMT+8 <a href=https://www.marketwatch.com/story/apple-is-playing-a-shell-game-with-its-app-store-changes-but-that-cant-last-forever-11630692106?mod=home-page><strong>MarketWatch</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Small, confusing changes are unlikely to satisfy app developers and regulators who want major changes to a structure that pays app-store owners up to 30% of all revenue and is a major profit center ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/apple-is-playing-a-shell-game-with-its-app-store-changes-but-that-cant-last-forever-11630692106?mod=home-page\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/apple-is-playing-a-shell-game-with-its-app-store-changes-but-that-cant-last-forever-11630692106?mod=home-page","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/599a65733b8245fcf7868668ef9ad712","article_id":"1193251876","content_text":"Small, confusing changes are unlikely to satisfy app developers and regulators who want major changes to a structure that pays app-store owners up to 30% of all revenue and is a major profit center for Apple.\n\nApple Inc. has engaged in a flurry of deal making in hopes of quelling concerns about anticompetitive practices with its popular App Store, but the barrage of confusing — and in some cases miniscule — changes have a commonality: They keep the core of Apple’s nearly $70 billion cash cow intact.\nApple AAPL,+0.42% in the past couple weeks has announced changes in the App Store as part of a settlement with a regulatory agencies in Japan and, separately, as part of a class action lawsuit settlement. The changes arrive as Apple’s App Store faces major scrutiny by regulators in the U.S. and worldwide, while waiting for a judge’s ruling in the landmark antitrust case filed against it by “Fortnite” maker Epic games Inc.\nThe core problem with the App Store is that it charges developers high commissions for in-app purchases, up to 30%, while not allowing them to offer alternatives that could avoid that charge. The practice has made the App Store an increasingly huge and important business for Apple, especially as the growth of the iPhone has slowed. For fiscal 2020, Apple’s services business, of which the App Store is the core revenue generator, reported annual sales of $54 billion with growth of 16.2%, while iPhone sales fell 3% on an annual basis.\nProfit from Apple’s app fees are estimated to be stunning, according to one economist who testified during the Epic trial. He estimated the App Store has generated profit margins of 75% and 78%, respectively, in the last two years. Apple does not publicly disclose financial results of the App Store specifically.\nThe most important concession came late Wednesday, when Apple said it would allow developers such as Netflix Inc. NFLX,+0.34% and Spotify Technology SA SPOT,-1.96% to provide their customers a link to their websites within the app that will allow the users to pay for their services outside of the App Store, sidestepping fees. The fine print shows how limited this change is, however: It only applies to “reader” apps that provide subscription content such as news, books, music and video, as well as content that users have previously purchased elsewhere.\nSpotify Chief Executive Daniel Ek tweeted on Thursday that Apple’s agreement may be a “step in the right direction,” but it does not solve the problem.\n“Our goal is to restore competition once and for all, not one arbitrary, self-serving step at a time,” Ek said on Twitter.\nEk made that comment even as shares of Spotify jumped 6% on Thursday, as investors hoped to see the unprofitable music-streaming company get a little closer to black ink on the blotter. For an example that shows the uneven treatment that Ek decries, though, take a look at Match Group Inc. MTCH,+0.73%\nIt appears unlikely that Match’s apps, which offer subscriptions to dating services such as Tinder, will fit under the “reader” app carve-out, though an Apple spokesman declined to comment on any specific apps and Match Group officials did not respond to a request for comment. Yet it is one of the main faces of the movement against app stores after an executive testified at a U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on the anticompetitive nature of Apple’s App Store and Alphabet Inc.’s GOOG GOOGL Google Play store that Match pays half a billion dollars in fees to the two tech companies every year.\nLikewise, videogames are not mentioned in any of the settlements, as Apple waits to hear what Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rodgers has to say about its battle with Epic. That means the money will definitely continue to flow in, as videogames are believed to generate the most sales in the App Store.\nEpic vs. Apple: The (predicted) verdict is in\nBoth of these settlements offer very little change to the App Store and just add more confusion. Instead of just simply cutting their commission, Apple has new convoluted rules that are unlikely to lead to lower costs for most developers, who still have to jump through many hoops to get an app approved by the App Store and have little chance of convincing customers to jump through hoops of their own to avoid the app maker paying Apple’s fee.\n“The changes were made to settle a developer lawsuit and, similar to other recent changes, the impact will be relatively immaterial,” said Amit Daryanani, an analyst with Evercore ISI, in a note to clients. “We do not think many customers will choose to follow instructions in the email and re-enter payment information, as they do not receive any benefit from helping the developer avoid Apple’s fees.”\nThe issue for Apple is that governments around the world are likely to see through this gambit and aim straight for the heart of the App Store’s revenue model. In South Korea, legislators passed a bill this week requiring both Apple and Google to allow alternate payment systems in apps, the first law of its kind in the world. A similarly targeted bill, called the Open App Markets Act, was introduced in the U.S. last month by three senators.\nWhile Tim Cook and the rest of the executives at Apple likely hope that this shell game of small, confusing concessions will be enough to stave off lawmakers, particularly in their home country, it is unlikely that app stores will escape from the current scrutiny without more major changes.\n“Over time, the fees are going to be pressured and the writing is on the wall,” said Ives of Wedbush Securities. “Apple will continue to make some olive branch moves, which puts them in good standing, given the pressure they are seeing…but I think they are going to aggressively defend their moat.”\nThe fallout from this push will have ripple effects all over tech, and could lead to big changes for consumers as well — Spotify, for instance, said it raised prices from $9.99 to $12.99 largely to cover its app store fees. Major changes, however, could eventually cut more deeply into one of Apple’s biggest cash cows and slowly dig away at the moat surrounding Apple’s castle.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":212,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9000764695,"gmtCreate":1640312193137,"gmtModify":1676533515951,"author":{"id":"3586302488708678","authorId":"3586302488708678","name":"SEAHJH","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3586302488708678","authorIdStr":"3586302488708678"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Yes ","listText":"Yes ","text":"Yes","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9000764695","repostId":"1168865278","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1168865278","pubTimestamp":1640311666,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1168865278?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-12-24 10:07","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Can Apple Stock Hit New Highs by Year's End?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1168865278","media":"TheStreet","summary":"Apple stock is higher on Thursday and could try to make a push to records before the end of the year","content":"<p>Apple stock is higher on Thursday and could try to make a push to records before the end of the year.</p>\n<p>Apple shares earlier this month were a market leader, but over the past few trading sessions, they've wobbled.</p>\n<p>As the overall market continued to sway with volatility, Apple was a beacon of strength. We were lucky with Apple stock. In fact, incredibly lucky.</p>\n<p>On Dec. 13 the Cupertino, Calif., tech giant was approaching a $3 trillion valuation. But I wrote about the potential sell-the-news bearish reversal that was in play. The stock then posted five daily losses in a six-session span.</p>\n<p>Apple has now begun to find its footing.</p>\n<p>It was recently reported that Apple was a massive buyer of its own stock last quarter — which is no surprise given its buyback commitment —as it led the S&P 500.</p>\n<p>Now bulls are wondering if all that buying will eventually pay off. Let’s look at the charts.</p>\n<p><b>Trading Apple Stock</b></p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6865ca6e0def05bb2a060b2af13be892\" tg-width=\"1139\" tg-height=\"866\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Daily chart of Apple stock.</span></p>\n<p>This morning I had Apple on my radar. Why? It’s simple.</p>\n<p>Look at the way shares of Apple closed lower on Friday and Monday, but both times rallied from the open. We know that by the look of the candle.</p>\n<p>Rather than a filled-in, deep-red candle (like Thursday, Dec. 16), we have two hollow red candles. That shows us a higher close from the open, even though the stock ended lower on the day. In other words, bulls were buying the opening dips.</p>\n<p>Further, Apple stock was holding the 21-day moving average.</p>\n<p>With yesterday’s bounce, Apple not only rallied off the 21-day moving average, it closed above the 10-day moving average.</p>\n<p>That had traders looking for a daily-up rotation over Tuesday’s high, at $173.20.</p>\n<p>From here I want to see whether Apple stock can continue to push higher. It’s above all its major daily moving averages.</p>\n<p>If it does continue higher, downtrend resistance and the $179.50 area are in play. Twice, Apple has failed on its push over $180. So if it does make a run higher, we want to be cognizant of this zone.</p>\n<p>Above $180 opens the door to the all-time high, at $182.13. Above that and we can start talking about the $188 to $194 zone, where Apple finds a few upside extensions.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Can Apple Stock Hit New Highs by Year's End?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nCan Apple Stock Hit New Highs by Year's End?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-12-24 10:07 GMT+8 <a href=https://www.thestreet.com/investing/trading-apple-aapl-stock-new-highs-before-year-end-december-2021><strong>TheStreet</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Apple stock is higher on Thursday and could try to make a push to records before the end of the year.\nApple shares earlier this month were a market leader, but over the past few trading sessions, they...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.thestreet.com/investing/trading-apple-aapl-stock-new-highs-before-year-end-december-2021\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://www.thestreet.com/investing/trading-apple-aapl-stock-new-highs-before-year-end-december-2021","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1168865278","content_text":"Apple stock is higher on Thursday and could try to make a push to records before the end of the year.\nApple shares earlier this month were a market leader, but over the past few trading sessions, they've wobbled.\nAs the overall market continued to sway with volatility, Apple was a beacon of strength. We were lucky with Apple stock. In fact, incredibly lucky.\nOn Dec. 13 the Cupertino, Calif., tech giant was approaching a $3 trillion valuation. But I wrote about the potential sell-the-news bearish reversal that was in play. The stock then posted five daily losses in a six-session span.\nApple has now begun to find its footing.\nIt was recently reported that Apple was a massive buyer of its own stock last quarter — which is no surprise given its buyback commitment —as it led the S&P 500.\nNow bulls are wondering if all that buying will eventually pay off. Let’s look at the charts.\nTrading Apple Stock\nDaily chart of Apple stock.\nThis morning I had Apple on my radar. Why? It’s simple.\nLook at the way shares of Apple closed lower on Friday and Monday, but both times rallied from the open. We know that by the look of the candle.\nRather than a filled-in, deep-red candle (like Thursday, Dec. 16), we have two hollow red candles. That shows us a higher close from the open, even though the stock ended lower on the day. In other words, bulls were buying the opening dips.\nFurther, Apple stock was holding the 21-day moving average.\nWith yesterday’s bounce, Apple not only rallied off the 21-day moving average, it closed above the 10-day moving average.\nThat had traders looking for a daily-up rotation over Tuesday’s high, at $173.20.\nFrom here I want to see whether Apple stock can continue to push higher. It’s above all its major daily moving averages.\nIf it does continue higher, downtrend resistance and the $179.50 area are in play. Twice, Apple has failed on its push over $180. So if it does make a run higher, we want to be cognizant of this zone.\nAbove $180 opens the door to the all-time high, at $182.13. Above that and we can start talking about the $188 to $194 zone, where Apple finds a few upside extensions.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":343,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":817140569,"gmtCreate":1630923713551,"gmtModify":1676530421459,"author":{"id":"3586302488708678","authorId":"3586302488708678","name":"SEAHJH","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3586302488708678","authorIdStr":"3586302488708678"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Awesome Lah","listText":"Awesome Lah","text":"Awesome Lah","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/817140569","repostId":"1120348716","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1120348716","pubTimestamp":1630918145,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1120348716?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-09-06 16:49","market":"us","language":"en","title":"NIO: The Slowdown Is Only Temporary","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1120348716","media":"seekingalpha","summary":"Summary\n\nNIO’s delivery numbers for August showed only year over year growth of 48.3%.\nNIO’s ES6 and","content":"<p><b>Summary</b></p>\n<ul>\n <li>NIO’s delivery numbers for August showed only year over year growth of 48.3%.</li>\n <li>NIO’s ES6 and EC6 production are affected by the chip supply shortage and the EV maker lowered the delivery forecast for the third-quarter.</li>\n <li>Delivery growth rates should snap back in Q4'21.</li>\n</ul>\n<p>Chinese electric vehicle maker <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NIO\">NIO Inc.</a> released worse than expected delivery numbers for August and lowered delivery guidance for Q3’21. Despite the revision, NIO will play an important role in EV adoption worldwide and the stock is facing great prospects long term.</p>\n<p><b>Slowdown in delivery growth is only temporary</b></p>\n<p>NIO has been used to reporting year over year delivery growth rates surpassing 100%. In July, the Chinese maker of electric sport utility vehicles, delivered close to 8,000 ES6s, ES8s and EC6s, with total cumulative deliveries growing 124.5% year over year. Rivals like <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LI\">Li Auto</a> (LI) and XPeng (XPEV) delivered more than 8,000 vehicles and generated all-time delivery records each in July. With rival EV makers catching up to NIO regarding production and deliveries, the market eagerly expected the presentation of NIO’s August delivery numbers… which disappointed, to say the least.</p>\n<p>NIO’s August delivery numbers took an unexpected hit from the chip shortage which continues to hamper factory output for automobile companies around the world. NIO delivered only5,880 vehiclesin August 2021, showing a growth rate of 48.3%, which is meager for EV makers. Compared to July, NIO’s delivery growth contracted 26% month over month, a sign that the chip supply shortage is having a larger than expected impact on NIO’s factory output and delivery capacity. In August, NIO delivered 2,342 ES6s, 1,800 EC6s and 1,738 ES8s. Because the supply crunch continues to hit NIO’s production, the EV maker lowered its Q3’21 delivery forecast from 23,000 to 25,000 vehicles to a lower level of 22,500 to 23,500. Based on the new guidance, NIO views it deliveries of 7,500 to 7,833 vehicles per month as realistic… which means delivery growth rates for the entire third-quarter will not be very strong.</p>\n<p>To add insult to injury, both Li Auto and XPeng delivered better growth rates for the month of August. Li Auto, which produces the Li ONE sport utility vehicle, delivered9,433 vehicleslast month, showing a growth rate of 248.0%. Li Auto also grew deliveries month over month, at a rate of 9.8%. XPeng also did well, and better than NIO. The maker of the P7 smart sedan and the G3 smart compact sport utility vehicle, delivered a total of7,214 electric vehicleslast month, representing a 172.0% year over year growth rate. However, XPeng also experienced a month over month drop in deliveries, but the drop was much less significant than in NIO’s case, 10.3%.</p>\n<p>Because of NIO’s new delivery guidance, my delivery forecast table for FY 2021 is now also updated. NIO said that the chip supply shortage predominantly affects the ES6 and the EC6 the most, the ES6 being NIO’s top-selling SUV on a volume basis. Since NIO’s factory output will continue to be hampered in Q3’21 - and production risks for Q4’21 have also increased - NIO is unlikely to achieve the 100,000 vehicle delivery milestone this year. I now estimate, with new information available, NIO to deliver a total of 90,206 EVs in FY 202, but my projections still assume a recovery in production and delivery rates in Q4’21. If the supply shortage spills over into the fourth-quarter, my delivery projections for Q4’21 are subject to revision.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9191b96947dee5ac658f631af148d36b\" tg-width=\"613\" tg-height=\"304\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><i>(Source: Author Projections)</i></p>\n<p>Although NIO’s delivery growth has begun to slow down, NIO is not at fault here. The semiconductor supply shortage affects EV and non-EV makers around the world as production of smart vehicles relies heavily on technology and computer chips. The market shrugged off news about a slowdown in NIO’s delivery growth and shares of NIO advanced above $40 again yesterday.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f33a8172b498cd0601d3094e4b7536b1\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"417\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">I expect NIO’s production and delivery rate to show strong signs of recovery in the fourth-quarter, although a full return to normal production may not occur before the first or second quarter of next year.</p>\n<p><b>One year from now, NIO should have a higher valuation</b></p>\n<p>NIO is no longer as cheap as it was last year and the EV maker requires investors to pay a higher sales multiplier factor for its growth. But this was also always true for Tesla (TSLA) which has never been cheap and Tesla’s shares, despite a high valuation, reached new highs steadily over the years. A year from now, the semiconductor supply shortage and slowdown in Q3’21 delivery growth will likely be nothing more than just a blip in NIO’s long growth story.</p>\n<p>NIO is expected togrow revenues 140%and may grow revenues even faster if NIO achieves mass market appeal with its SUVs and brings new sedan products to market (the ET7 sedan is expected to launch at the beginning of next year). NIO is still very much at the beginning of its growth and the risk profile, despite a P-S ratio of 7.1, is skewed to the upside.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/95ca878a48af8b28583174a399278a6b\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"433\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><b>Risks with NIO</b></p>\n<p>The biggest risk for NIO is that EV delivery growth slows down permanently, the risk of which is likely low. Other car brands also felt the pinch from the chip supply crunch this year but the industry will move past this. Short term, however, a semiconductor shortage that gets worse before it gets better is a big risk that investors in EV maker NIO need to know about. My projections for total FY 2021 deliveries, especially the implied production rebound in Q4’21, may still be too optimistic. Longer term, a slowdown in NIO’s revenue growth, due to intensifying competition, poses a challenge.</p>\n<p><b>Final thoughts</b></p>\n<p>NIO’s drop in delivery growth is only temporary. How long this “temporary” will last is up for discussion, but based on NIO’s new guidance, the slowdown will last at least through the entire third-quarter. Once the chip supply shortage eases - which I expect to be the case in Q1’22 - NIO’s production and delivery should snap back and progress to new records. In the meantime, any major dip in NIO’s market value may be considered a buying opportunity.</p>","source":"seekingalpha","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>NIO: The Slowdown Is Only Temporary</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nNIO: The Slowdown Is Only Temporary\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-09-06 16:49 GMT+8 <a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4453441-nio-the-slowdown-is-only-temporary><strong>seekingalpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Summary\n\nNIO’s delivery numbers for August showed only year over year growth of 48.3%.\nNIO’s ES6 and EC6 production are affected by the chip supply shortage and the EV maker lowered the delivery ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4453441-nio-the-slowdown-is-only-temporary\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NIO":"蔚来"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4453441-nio-the-slowdown-is-only-temporary","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5a36db9d73b4222bc376d24ccc48c8a4","article_id":"1120348716","content_text":"Summary\n\nNIO’s delivery numbers for August showed only year over year growth of 48.3%.\nNIO’s ES6 and EC6 production are affected by the chip supply shortage and the EV maker lowered the delivery forecast for the third-quarter.\nDelivery growth rates should snap back in Q4'21.\n\nChinese electric vehicle maker NIO Inc. released worse than expected delivery numbers for August and lowered delivery guidance for Q3’21. Despite the revision, NIO will play an important role in EV adoption worldwide and the stock is facing great prospects long term.\nSlowdown in delivery growth is only temporary\nNIO has been used to reporting year over year delivery growth rates surpassing 100%. In July, the Chinese maker of electric sport utility vehicles, delivered close to 8,000 ES6s, ES8s and EC6s, with total cumulative deliveries growing 124.5% year over year. Rivals like Li Auto (LI) and XPeng (XPEV) delivered more than 8,000 vehicles and generated all-time delivery records each in July. With rival EV makers catching up to NIO regarding production and deliveries, the market eagerly expected the presentation of NIO’s August delivery numbers… which disappointed, to say the least.\nNIO’s August delivery numbers took an unexpected hit from the chip shortage which continues to hamper factory output for automobile companies around the world. NIO delivered only5,880 vehiclesin August 2021, showing a growth rate of 48.3%, which is meager for EV makers. Compared to July, NIO’s delivery growth contracted 26% month over month, a sign that the chip supply shortage is having a larger than expected impact on NIO’s factory output and delivery capacity. In August, NIO delivered 2,342 ES6s, 1,800 EC6s and 1,738 ES8s. Because the supply crunch continues to hit NIO’s production, the EV maker lowered its Q3’21 delivery forecast from 23,000 to 25,000 vehicles to a lower level of 22,500 to 23,500. Based on the new guidance, NIO views it deliveries of 7,500 to 7,833 vehicles per month as realistic… which means delivery growth rates for the entire third-quarter will not be very strong.\nTo add insult to injury, both Li Auto and XPeng delivered better growth rates for the month of August. Li Auto, which produces the Li ONE sport utility vehicle, delivered9,433 vehicleslast month, showing a growth rate of 248.0%. Li Auto also grew deliveries month over month, at a rate of 9.8%. XPeng also did well, and better than NIO. The maker of the P7 smart sedan and the G3 smart compact sport utility vehicle, delivered a total of7,214 electric vehicleslast month, representing a 172.0% year over year growth rate. However, XPeng also experienced a month over month drop in deliveries, but the drop was much less significant than in NIO’s case, 10.3%.\nBecause of NIO’s new delivery guidance, my delivery forecast table for FY 2021 is now also updated. NIO said that the chip supply shortage predominantly affects the ES6 and the EC6 the most, the ES6 being NIO’s top-selling SUV on a volume basis. Since NIO’s factory output will continue to be hampered in Q3’21 - and production risks for Q4’21 have also increased - NIO is unlikely to achieve the 100,000 vehicle delivery milestone this year. I now estimate, with new information available, NIO to deliver a total of 90,206 EVs in FY 202, but my projections still assume a recovery in production and delivery rates in Q4’21. If the supply shortage spills over into the fourth-quarter, my delivery projections for Q4’21 are subject to revision.\n(Source: Author Projections)\nAlthough NIO’s delivery growth has begun to slow down, NIO is not at fault here. The semiconductor supply shortage affects EV and non-EV makers around the world as production of smart vehicles relies heavily on technology and computer chips. The market shrugged off news about a slowdown in NIO’s delivery growth and shares of NIO advanced above $40 again yesterday.\nI expect NIO’s production and delivery rate to show strong signs of recovery in the fourth-quarter, although a full return to normal production may not occur before the first or second quarter of next year.\nOne year from now, NIO should have a higher valuation\nNIO is no longer as cheap as it was last year and the EV maker requires investors to pay a higher sales multiplier factor for its growth. But this was also always true for Tesla (TSLA) which has never been cheap and Tesla’s shares, despite a high valuation, reached new highs steadily over the years. A year from now, the semiconductor supply shortage and slowdown in Q3’21 delivery growth will likely be nothing more than just a blip in NIO’s long growth story.\nNIO is expected togrow revenues 140%and may grow revenues even faster if NIO achieves mass market appeal with its SUVs and brings new sedan products to market (the ET7 sedan is expected to launch at the beginning of next year). NIO is still very much at the beginning of its growth and the risk profile, despite a P-S ratio of 7.1, is skewed to the upside.\nRisks with NIO\nThe biggest risk for NIO is that EV delivery growth slows down permanently, the risk of which is likely low. Other car brands also felt the pinch from the chip supply crunch this year but the industry will move past this. Short term, however, a semiconductor shortage that gets worse before it gets better is a big risk that investors in EV maker NIO need to know about. My projections for total FY 2021 deliveries, especially the implied production rebound in Q4’21, may still be too optimistic. Longer term, a slowdown in NIO’s revenue growth, due to intensifying competition, poses a challenge.\nFinal thoughts\nNIO’s drop in delivery growth is only temporary. How long this “temporary” will last is up for discussion, but based on NIO’s new guidance, the slowdown will last at least through the entire third-quarter. Once the chip supply shortage eases - which I expect to be the case in Q1’22 - NIO’s production and delivery should snap back and progress to new records. In the meantime, any major dip in NIO’s market value may be considered a buying opportunity.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":295,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":816407037,"gmtCreate":1630510827529,"gmtModify":1676530326796,"author":{"id":"3586302488708678","authorId":"3586302488708678","name":"SEAHJH","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3586302488708678","authorIdStr":"3586302488708678"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/816407037","repostId":"1136463591","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1136463591","pubTimestamp":1630505469,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1136463591?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-09-01 22:11","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Future Apple Watch models will include fertility tracking, fever detection","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1136463591","media":"seekingalpha","summary":"Apple(NASDAQ:AAPL)has made the Apple Watch the center of its healthcare efforts and features planned","content":"<ul>\n <li>Apple(NASDAQ:AAPL)has made the Apple Watch the center of its healthcare efforts and features planned for the 2022 model include body temperature measurement for fertility planning and an alert for increasing blood pressure.</li>\n <li>Wall Street Journal sources say Apple Watch plans beyond next year include sleep apnea detection, providing guidance in cases of low blood oxygen and identifying diabetes.</li>\n <li>The listed features might never appear in a Watch sold to consumers or the timelines could change.</li>\n <li>The Apple Watch Series 7 was expected to debut later this month along with the new iPhone handsets, but recent reports say the wearable has hit production delays.</li>\n <li>Wearables represent Apple's third-largest segment by revenue after the iPhone and services. In the recent third-quarter report, wearables sales totaled $8.78 billion, up from $6.45 billion in the same period last year.</li>\n <li>Also on Wednesday, Apple said Arizona and Georgia would be the first states to allow their residents to store their driver's licenses and state ID cards within Apple Wallet.</li>\n</ul>","source":"seekingalpha","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Future Apple Watch models will include fertility tracking, fever detection</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFuture Apple Watch models will include fertility tracking, fever detection\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-09-01 22:11 GMT+8 <a href=https://seekingalpha.com/news/3736079-future-apple-watch-models-will-include-fertility-tracking-fever-detection><strong>seekingalpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Apple(NASDAQ:AAPL)has made the Apple Watch the center of its healthcare efforts and features planned for the 2022 model include body temperature measurement for fertility planning and an alert for ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/news/3736079-future-apple-watch-models-will-include-fertility-tracking-fever-detection\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/news/3736079-future-apple-watch-models-will-include-fertility-tracking-fever-detection","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5a36db9d73b4222bc376d24ccc48c8a4","article_id":"1136463591","content_text":"Apple(NASDAQ:AAPL)has made the Apple Watch the center of its healthcare efforts and features planned for the 2022 model include body temperature measurement for fertility planning and an alert for increasing blood pressure.\nWall Street Journal sources say Apple Watch plans beyond next year include sleep apnea detection, providing guidance in cases of low blood oxygen and identifying diabetes.\nThe listed features might never appear in a Watch sold to consumers or the timelines could change.\nThe Apple Watch Series 7 was expected to debut later this month along with the new iPhone handsets, but recent reports say the wearable has hit production delays.\nWearables represent Apple's third-largest segment by revenue after the iPhone and services. In the recent third-quarter report, wearables sales totaled $8.78 billion, up from $6.45 billion in the same period last year.\nAlso on Wednesday, Apple said Arizona and Georgia would be the first states to allow their residents to store their driver's licenses and state ID cards within Apple Wallet.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":245,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":816405826,"gmtCreate":1630510774965,"gmtModify":1676530326754,"author":{"id":"3586302488708678","authorId":"3586302488708678","name":"SEAHJH","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3586302488708678","authorIdStr":"3586302488708678"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"?","listText":"?","text":"?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/816405826","repostId":"1136463591","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":207,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}
