mrzh personal page - To The Moon

mrzh

mrzh

No personal profile

1Follow

0Followers

0Topic

0Badge

2022-09-17

That's great!

US STOCKS-Wall St Drops to Two-Month Lows As Recession Fears Mount

2022-09-13

Okkk

Biden Finalized His Plan to Rein in Big Tech. Big Tech Wasn't Invited

2022-09-13

Kept repeating quantitative, means something

Stock-Market Wild Card: What Investors Need to Know as Fed Shrinks Balance Sheet at Faster Pace

2022-08-21

Lovely

Amazon Is "the Dark Horse" in Streaming As Tech Giants "Have Nothing to Lose": Analyst

2022-08-11

Nice

3 Reasons to Buy Apple Stock Now

2022-08-11

Ok

Why Wednesday’s Jump in Tesla Shares Surprised Investors

Go to Tiger App to see more news

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"userPageInfo":{"id":"4093501445886610","uuid":"4093501445886610","gmtCreate":1657086531986,"gmtModify":1660195673449,"name":"mrzh","pinyin":"mrzh","introduction":"","introductionEn":"","signature":"","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/c26fff9effd22bd1b2fc753bc22da7f9","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":0,"headSize":1,"tweetSize":6,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":0,"name":"","nameTw":"","represent":"","factor":"","iconColor":"","bgColor":""},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":"success","userBadges":[{"badgeId":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493-1","templateUuid":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493","name":"Debut Tiger","description":"Join the tiger community for 500 days","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0e4d0ca1da0456dc7894c946d44bf9ab","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0f2f65e8ce4cfaae8db2bea9b127f58b","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c5948a31b6edf154422335b265235809","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.11.19","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789-1","templateUuid":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789","name":"Knowledgeable Investor","description":"Traded more than 10 stocks","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e74cc24115c4fbae6154ec1b1041bf47","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d48265cbfd97c57f9048db29f22227b0","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76c6d6898b073c77e1c537ebe9ac1c57","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":1,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.03.29","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1102},{"badgeId":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84-1","templateUuid":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84","name":"Real Trader","description":"Completed a transaction","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2022.07.28","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":3,"currentWearingBadge":{"badgeId":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789-1","templateUuid":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789","name":"Knowledgeable Investor","description":"Traded more than 10 stocks","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e74cc24115c4fbae6154ec1b1041bf47","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d48265cbfd97c57f9048db29f22227b0","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76c6d6898b073c77e1c537ebe9ac1c57","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":1,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.03.29","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1102},"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":null,"starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"post","tweets":[{"id":9937804683,"gmtCreate":1663387455642,"gmtModify":1676537264024,"author":{"id":"4093501445886610","authorId":"4093501445886610","name":"mrzh","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/c26fff9effd22bd1b2fc753bc22da7f9","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4093501445886610","authorIdStr":"4093501445886610"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"That's great!","listText":"That's great!","text":"That's great!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9937804683","repostId":"2268610718","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2268610718","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1663369158,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2268610718?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-09-17 06:59","market":"us","language":"en","title":"US STOCKS-Wall St Drops to Two-Month Lows As Recession Fears Mount","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2268610718","media":"Reuters","summary":"* FedEx profit warning hits peers* All three major U.S. indexes post sharp weekly declines* Investors eye next week's Fed meeting* Indexes down: Dow 0.45%, S&P 0.72%, Nasdaq 0.90%NEW YORK, Sept 16 (Re","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>* FedEx profit warning hits peers</p><p>* All three major U.S. indexes post sharp weekly declines</p><p>* Investors eye next week&#39;s Fed meeting</p><p>* Indexes down: Dow 0.45%, S&amp;P 0.72%, Nasdaq 0.90%</p><p>NEW YORK, Sept 16 (Reuters) - U.S. stocks ended in the red on Friday, falling to two-month lows as a warning of impending global slowdown from FedEx hastened investors&#39; flight to safety at the conclusion of a tumultuous week.</p><p>All three major U.S. stock indexes slid to levels not touched since mid-July, with the S&amp;P 500 closing below 3,900, a closely watched support level.</p><p>Staggering past the finish line of a week rattled by inflation concerns, looming interest rate hikes and ominous economic warning signs, the S&amp;P 500 and the Nasdaq suffered their worst weekly percentage plunges since June.</p><p>&#34;It’s been a tough week. It feels Halloween came early&#34; said David Carter, managing director at JPMorgan in New York. &#34;We are facing in this toxic brew of high inflation, high interest rates and low growth, which isn’t good for stock or bond markets.&#34;</p><p>Risk-off sentiment went from simmer to boil in the wake of FedEx Corp&#39;s withdrawal of its earnings forecast late Thursday, citing signs of dampening global demand.</p><p>FedEx&#39;s move followed remarks from the World Bank and the IMF, both of which warned of an impending worldwide economic slowdown.</p><p>A deluge of mixed economic data, dominated by a hotter-than-expected inflation report (CPI), cemented an interest rate hike of at least 75 basis points at the conclusion of the Fed&#39;s monetary policy meeting next week.</p><p>&#34;While the market is expecting a big bump in the Fed’s rates next week, there is tremendous uncertainty and concern about future rate increases,&#34; Carter added. &#34;The Fed is doing what it needs to do. And after some pain, markets and the economy will heal themselves.&#34;</p><p>Financial markets have priced in a 18% likelihood of a super-sized, 100 basis point increase to the Fed funds target rate on Wednesday, according to CME&#39;s FedWatch tool.   </p><p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 139.4 points, or 0.45%, to 30,822.42, the S&amp;P 500 lost 28.02 points, or 0.72%, to 3,873.33 and the Nasdaq Composite dropped 103.95 points, or 0.9%, to 11,448.40.</p><p>Nine of the 11 major sectors of the S&amp;P 500 ended in negative territory, with energy and industrials suffering the sharpest percentage drops.</p><p>Dow Transports, viewed as a barometer of economic health, plummeted 5.1%.</p><p>That drop was led by FedEx shares tanking by 21.4%, the biggest drop in the S&amp;P 500.</p><p>Peers United Parcel Service and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/XPO\">XPO Logistics</a> slid 4.5% and 4.7%, respectively, while Amazon.com Inc slipped 2.1%.</p><p>The session also marked the monthly options expiry, which occurs on the third Friday of every month. Options-hedging activity has amplified market moves this year, contributing to heightened volatility.</p><p>The CBOE Market Volatility index, often called &#34;the fear index,&#34; touched a two-month high, breezing past a level associated with heightened investor anxiety.</p><p>Declining issues outnumbered advancing ones on the NYSE by a 3.04-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 2.24-to-1 ratio favored decliners.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 posted no new 52-week highs and 56 new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 21 new highs and 387 new lows.</p><p>Volume on U.S. exchanges was 16.92 billion shares, compared with the 10.72 billion average for the full session over the last 20 trading days.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>US STOCKS-Wall St Drops to Two-Month Lows As Recession Fears Mount</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nUS STOCKS-Wall St Drops to Two-Month Lows As Recession Fears Mount\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-09-17 06:59</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>* FedEx profit warning hits peers</p><p>* All three major U.S. indexes post sharp weekly declines</p><p>* Investors eye next week&#39;s Fed meeting</p><p>* Indexes down: Dow 0.45%, S&amp;P 0.72%, Nasdaq 0.90%</p><p>NEW YORK, Sept 16 (Reuters) - U.S. stocks ended in the red on Friday, falling to two-month lows as a warning of impending global slowdown from FedEx hastened investors&#39; flight to safety at the conclusion of a tumultuous week.</p><p>All three major U.S. stock indexes slid to levels not touched since mid-July, with the S&amp;P 500 closing below 3,900, a closely watched support level.</p><p>Staggering past the finish line of a week rattled by inflation concerns, looming interest rate hikes and ominous economic warning signs, the S&amp;P 500 and the Nasdaq suffered their worst weekly percentage plunges since June.</p><p>&#34;It’s been a tough week. It feels Halloween came early&#34; said David Carter, managing director at JPMorgan in New York. &#34;We are facing in this toxic brew of high inflation, high interest rates and low growth, which isn’t good for stock or bond markets.&#34;</p><p>Risk-off sentiment went from simmer to boil in the wake of FedEx Corp&#39;s withdrawal of its earnings forecast late Thursday, citing signs of dampening global demand.</p><p>FedEx&#39;s move followed remarks from the World Bank and the IMF, both of which warned of an impending worldwide economic slowdown.</p><p>A deluge of mixed economic data, dominated by a hotter-than-expected inflation report (CPI), cemented an interest rate hike of at least 75 basis points at the conclusion of the Fed&#39;s monetary policy meeting next week.</p><p>&#34;While the market is expecting a big bump in the Fed’s rates next week, there is tremendous uncertainty and concern about future rate increases,&#34; Carter added. &#34;The Fed is doing what it needs to do. And after some pain, markets and the economy will heal themselves.&#34;</p><p>Financial markets have priced in a 18% likelihood of a super-sized, 100 basis point increase to the Fed funds target rate on Wednesday, according to CME&#39;s FedWatch tool.   </p><p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 139.4 points, or 0.45%, to 30,822.42, the S&amp;P 500 lost 28.02 points, or 0.72%, to 3,873.33 and the Nasdaq Composite dropped 103.95 points, or 0.9%, to 11,448.40.</p><p>Nine of the 11 major sectors of the S&amp;P 500 ended in negative territory, with energy and industrials suffering the sharpest percentage drops.</p><p>Dow Transports, viewed as a barometer of economic health, plummeted 5.1%.</p><p>That drop was led by FedEx shares tanking by 21.4%, the biggest drop in the S&amp;P 500.</p><p>Peers United Parcel Service and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/XPO\">XPO Logistics</a> slid 4.5% and 4.7%, respectively, while Amazon.com Inc slipped 2.1%.</p><p>The session also marked the monthly options expiry, which occurs on the third Friday of every month. Options-hedging activity has amplified market moves this year, contributing to heightened volatility.</p><p>The CBOE Market Volatility index, often called &#34;the fear index,&#34; touched a two-month high, breezing past a level associated with heightened investor anxiety.</p><p>Declining issues outnumbered advancing ones on the NYSE by a 3.04-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 2.24-to-1 ratio favored decliners.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 posted no new 52-week highs and 56 new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 21 new highs and 387 new lows.</p><p>Volume on U.S. exchanges was 16.92 billion shares, compared with the 10.72 billion average for the full session over the last 20 trading days.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"161125":"标普500","513500":"标普500ETF","BK4554":"元宇宙及AR概念","BK4532":"文艺复兴科技持仓",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","OEX":"标普100","DDM":"道指两倍做多ETF","SDS":"两倍做空标普500ETF","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","BK4507":"流媒体概念","BK4533":"AQR资本管理(全球第二大对冲基金)","BK4566":"资本集团","DOG":"道指反向ETF","UPS":"联合包裹","CPI":"IQ Real Return ETF","BK4535":"淡马锡持仓","BK4524":"宅经济概念","BK4581":"高盛持仓","DJX":"1/100道琼斯","UDOW":"道指三倍做多ETF-ProShares","BK4538":"云计算","UPRO":"三倍做多标普500ETF","BK4527":"明星科技股","BK4559":"巴菲特持仓","SH":"标普500反向ETF","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓","BK4131":"航空货运与物流","BK4579":"人工智能","XPO":"XPO Logistics","BK4122":"互联网与直销零售","IVV":"标普500指数ETF","BK4503":"景林资产持仓","BK4551":"寇图资本持仓","SSO":"两倍做多标普500ETF","BK4022":"陆运","BK4561":"索罗斯持仓","SPXU":"三倍做空标普500ETF","OEF":"标普100指数ETF-iShares","FDX":"联邦快递","BK4504":"桥水持仓","BK4548":"巴美列捷福持仓","SPY":"标普500ETF","DXD":"道指两倍做空ETF","AMZN":"亚马逊",".DJI":"道琼斯","SDOW":"道指三倍做空ETF-ProShares",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2268610718","content_text":"* FedEx profit warning hits peers* All three major U.S. indexes post sharp weekly declines* Investors eye next week's Fed meeting* Indexes down: Dow 0.45%, S&P 0.72%, Nasdaq 0.90%NEW YORK, Sept 16 (Reuters) - U.S. stocks ended in the red on Friday, falling to two-month lows as a warning of impending global slowdown from FedEx hastened investors' flight to safety at the conclusion of a tumultuous week.All three major U.S. stock indexes slid to levels not touched since mid-July, with the S&P 500 closing below 3,900, a closely watched support level.Staggering past the finish line of a week rattled by inflation concerns, looming interest rate hikes and ominous economic warning signs, the S&P 500 and the Nasdaq suffered their worst weekly percentage plunges since June.\"It’s been a tough week. It feels Halloween came early\" said David Carter, managing director at JPMorgan in New York. \"We are facing in this toxic brew of high inflation, high interest rates and low growth, which isn’t good for stock or bond markets.\"Risk-off sentiment went from simmer to boil in the wake of FedEx Corp's withdrawal of its earnings forecast late Thursday, citing signs of dampening global demand.FedEx's move followed remarks from the World Bank and the IMF, both of which warned of an impending worldwide economic slowdown.A deluge of mixed economic data, dominated by a hotter-than-expected inflation report (CPI), cemented an interest rate hike of at least 75 basis points at the conclusion of the Fed's monetary policy meeting next week.\"While the market is expecting a big bump in the Fed’s rates next week, there is tremendous uncertainty and concern about future rate increases,\" Carter added. \"The Fed is doing what it needs to do. And after some pain, markets and the economy will heal themselves.\"Financial markets have priced in a 18% likelihood of a super-sized, 100 basis point increase to the Fed funds target rate on Wednesday, according to CME's FedWatch tool.   The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 139.4 points, or 0.45%, to 30,822.42, the S&P 500 lost 28.02 points, or 0.72%, to 3,873.33 and the Nasdaq Composite dropped 103.95 points, or 0.9%, to 11,448.40.Nine of the 11 major sectors of the S&P 500 ended in negative territory, with energy and industrials suffering the sharpest percentage drops.Dow Transports, viewed as a barometer of economic health, plummeted 5.1%.That drop was led by FedEx shares tanking by 21.4%, the biggest drop in the S&P 500.Peers United Parcel Service and XPO Logistics slid 4.5% and 4.7%, respectively, while Amazon.com Inc slipped 2.1%.The session also marked the monthly options expiry, which occurs on the third Friday of every month. Options-hedging activity has amplified market moves this year, contributing to heightened volatility.The CBOE Market Volatility index, often called \"the fear index,\" touched a two-month high, breezing past a level associated with heightened investor anxiety.Declining issues outnumbered advancing ones on the NYSE by a 3.04-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 2.24-to-1 ratio favored decliners.The S&P 500 posted no new 52-week highs and 56 new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 21 new highs and 387 new lows.Volume on U.S. exchanges was 16.92 billion shares, compared with the 10.72 billion average for the full session over the last 20 trading days.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":566,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9935003490,"gmtCreate":1663001030410,"gmtModify":1676537179992,"author":{"id":"4093501445886610","authorId":"4093501445886610","name":"mrzh","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/c26fff9effd22bd1b2fc753bc22da7f9","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4093501445886610","authorIdStr":"4093501445886610"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Okkk","listText":"Okkk","text":"Okkk","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9935003490","repostId":"2266804526","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2266804526","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1662983039,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2266804526?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-09-12 19:43","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Biden Finalized His Plan to Rein in Big Tech. Big Tech Wasn't Invited","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2266804526","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"President Joe Biden's administration issued a checklist of actions needed to reign in Big Tech on Th","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>President Joe Biden&#39;s administration issued a checklist of actions needed to reign in Big Tech on Thursday, after a roundtable &#34;listening session&#34; on issues within the technology industry.</p><p>But administration officials were not &#34;listening&#34; to the companies that are the targets of many of the desired actions -- Google parent Alphabet Inc. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GOOGL\">$(GOOGL)$</a>(GOOGL), Amazon.com Inc. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMZN\">$(AMZN)$</a>, Apple Inc. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">$(AAPL)$</a>and Facebook parent company <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/META\">Meta Platforms</a> Inc. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/META.UK\">$(META.UK)$</a> The only representatives of the tech industry in attendance were the chief executives of Mozilla Corp. and Sonos Inc. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SONO\">$(SONO)$</a></p><p>&#34;The rise of tech platforms has introduced new and difficult challenges, from the tragic acts of violence linked to toxic online cultures, to deteriorating mental health and well-being, to basic rights of Americans and communities worldwide suffering from the rise of tech platforms big and small,&#34; the White House said in a statement after convening 16 experts -- most of them administration employees -- to discuss technology.</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GGLS\">None</a> of the Big Tech companies replied to request for comment on the listening session, but people familiar with the thinking at two of the companies weren&#39;t entirely surprised. They noted increased actions by the administration to hold social-media companies and purveyors of large digital platforms more accountable with the chances of a Senate vote seemingly dwindling by the hour.</p><p>Industry analysts, however, expressed disappointment at an exclusive, private meeting that recommended punitive actions against the industry&#39;s biggest players without offering a seat at the table. The most controversial reform mentioned on the administration&#39;s list called for &#34;the removal of special protections for large tech platforms,&#34; including changing Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. The section generally provides website platforms immunity from third-party content.</p><p>&#34;Section 230 provides critical protections for platforms of all sizes to moderate content and take down harmful posts, and our research confirms these protections are most important for smaller sites,&#34; Chamber of Progress CEO Adam Kovacevich said. The trade group is funded by Amazon, Meta, Google, Apple, Twitter Inc. (TWTR), Uber Technologies Inc. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/UBER\">$(UBER)$</a> and others.</p><p>Six broad goals listed by the White House mirror legislation slowly wending its way through Congress, the latest indication of a growing crackdown by the White House on high tech&#39;s influence while legislation wallows in the Senate and House. The Justice Department is expected to file antitrust lawsuits against Google for its online-ad business and Apple for its dominant App Store in coming weeks, according to reports in The Wall Street Journal, Politico and elsewhere.</p><p>Social media platforms -- in particular, Meta, Twitter, TikTok and YouTube -- have been identified as the scourge of politicians who are playing to popular sentiment for reining in digital-data collectors such as Meta and Amazon. Those two companies are prime targets of the Federal Trade Commission.</p><p>Congressional inaction was reflected earlier this week when a flustered Sen. Amy Klobuchar, a Minnesota Democrat who is author of a bill to tamp down the power of powerful digital platform landlords like Apple and Facebook, claimed an &#34;incredible onslaught of money&#34; has been an obstacle to passing the legislation.</p><p>&#34;What has slowed us down is the incredible onslaught of money, and that&#39;s what happens with monopolies,&#34; Klobuchar, author of the American Innovation and Choice Online Act, said Tuesday at the Code Conference in Los Angeles. &#34;The senators are talking about it, about the ads running in each state.&#34;</p><p>Organizations funded by the technology industry have plowed more than $200 million on political ads and other lobbying efforts since the beginning of 2021, according to ad-tracking service AdImpact and others.</p><p>Klobuchar, who has written a book on antitrust reform and chaired the Senate Judiciary Committee&#39;s hearings on anticompetitive business practices for more than a year, has furiously pushed for a full Senate vote on her landmark bill as time melts with each passing day in the current legislative session. [The White House said Thursday it was encouraged to see bipartisan interest in Congress to adopt antitrust legislation to address the power of major U.S. tech companies.]</p><p>But absent any of the major principal companies in attendance, reporters pressed White House spokeswoman Karine Jean-Pierreon the participation of Mozilla CEO Mitchell Baker and Sonos CEO Patrick Spence to represent the views of the tech industry.</p><p>Sonos and Google are locked in a series of lawsuits against one another over speaker technology since 2020. Sonos called two suits filed last month by Google an &#34;intimidation tactic&#34; intended to &#34;retaliate against Sonos for speaking out against Google&#39;s monopolistic practices&#34; of royalty payments.</p><p>Nonprofit Mozilla, whose Firefox web browser competes with the likes of Google, has repeatedly clashed with Big Tech. On Friday, the company&#39;s chief security officer, Marshall Erwin, urged federal regulators to crack down on internet giants and browser makers that don&#39;t protect users&#39; privacy.</p><p>&#34;Privacy online is a mess, consumers are stuck in this vicious cycle in which their data is collected, often without their understanding, and then used to manipulate them,&#34; Erwin said during an FTC forum on commercial surveillance and data security.</p><p>&#34;The way that we see the roundtable today, it is, again, the largest roundtable that we have seen from this administration to deal with tech,&#34; Jean-Pierresaid. &#34;What you should take out from today, or take away from today, is that, you know, the president&#39;s going to and has long called for fundamental legislative reforms to address real issues. And so we&#39;re going to continue to do that.&#34;</p><p>The elusive reply came a day before Biden met in Ohio with Intel Corp. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/INTC\">$(INTC)$</a> CEO Pat Gelsinger at a groundbreaking ceremony for Intel&#39;s new $20 billion semiconductor manufacturing facility weeks after Congress passed the $280 billion Chips and Science Act in July.</p><p>&#34;The future of the chip industry is going to be made in America,&#34; Biden said at the event, a White House pre-midterms push to tout new funding for manufacturing and infrastructure. &#34;The industrial <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MDWT\">Midwest</a> is back.&#34;</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Biden Finalized His Plan to Rein in Big Tech. Big Tech Wasn't Invited</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBiden Finalized His Plan to Rein in Big Tech. Big Tech Wasn't Invited\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-09-12 19:43</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>President Joe Biden&#39;s administration issued a checklist of actions needed to reign in Big Tech on Thursday, after a roundtable &#34;listening session&#34; on issues within the technology industry.</p><p>But administration officials were not &#34;listening&#34; to the companies that are the targets of many of the desired actions -- Google parent Alphabet Inc. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GOOGL\">$(GOOGL)$</a>(GOOGL), Amazon.com Inc. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMZN\">$(AMZN)$</a>, Apple Inc. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">$(AAPL)$</a>and Facebook parent company <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/META\">Meta Platforms</a> Inc. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/META.UK\">$(META.UK)$</a> The only representatives of the tech industry in attendance were the chief executives of Mozilla Corp. and Sonos Inc. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SONO\">$(SONO)$</a></p><p>&#34;The rise of tech platforms has introduced new and difficult challenges, from the tragic acts of violence linked to toxic online cultures, to deteriorating mental health and well-being, to basic rights of Americans and communities worldwide suffering from the rise of tech platforms big and small,&#34; the White House said in a statement after convening 16 experts -- most of them administration employees -- to discuss technology.</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GGLS\">None</a> of the Big Tech companies replied to request for comment on the listening session, but people familiar with the thinking at two of the companies weren&#39;t entirely surprised. They noted increased actions by the administration to hold social-media companies and purveyors of large digital platforms more accountable with the chances of a Senate vote seemingly dwindling by the hour.</p><p>Industry analysts, however, expressed disappointment at an exclusive, private meeting that recommended punitive actions against the industry&#39;s biggest players without offering a seat at the table. The most controversial reform mentioned on the administration&#39;s list called for &#34;the removal of special protections for large tech platforms,&#34; including changing Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. The section generally provides website platforms immunity from third-party content.</p><p>&#34;Section 230 provides critical protections for platforms of all sizes to moderate content and take down harmful posts, and our research confirms these protections are most important for smaller sites,&#34; Chamber of Progress CEO Adam Kovacevich said. The trade group is funded by Amazon, Meta, Google, Apple, Twitter Inc. (TWTR), Uber Technologies Inc. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/UBER\">$(UBER)$</a> and others.</p><p>Six broad goals listed by the White House mirror legislation slowly wending its way through Congress, the latest indication of a growing crackdown by the White House on high tech&#39;s influence while legislation wallows in the Senate and House. The Justice Department is expected to file antitrust lawsuits against Google for its online-ad business and Apple for its dominant App Store in coming weeks, according to reports in The Wall Street Journal, Politico and elsewhere.</p><p>Social media platforms -- in particular, Meta, Twitter, TikTok and YouTube -- have been identified as the scourge of politicians who are playing to popular sentiment for reining in digital-data collectors such as Meta and Amazon. Those two companies are prime targets of the Federal Trade Commission.</p><p>Congressional inaction was reflected earlier this week when a flustered Sen. Amy Klobuchar, a Minnesota Democrat who is author of a bill to tamp down the power of powerful digital platform landlords like Apple and Facebook, claimed an &#34;incredible onslaught of money&#34; has been an obstacle to passing the legislation.</p><p>&#34;What has slowed us down is the incredible onslaught of money, and that&#39;s what happens with monopolies,&#34; Klobuchar, author of the American Innovation and Choice Online Act, said Tuesday at the Code Conference in Los Angeles. &#34;The senators are talking about it, about the ads running in each state.&#34;</p><p>Organizations funded by the technology industry have plowed more than $200 million on political ads and other lobbying efforts since the beginning of 2021, according to ad-tracking service AdImpact and others.</p><p>Klobuchar, who has written a book on antitrust reform and chaired the Senate Judiciary Committee&#39;s hearings on anticompetitive business practices for more than a year, has furiously pushed for a full Senate vote on her landmark bill as time melts with each passing day in the current legislative session. [The White House said Thursday it was encouraged to see bipartisan interest in Congress to adopt antitrust legislation to address the power of major U.S. tech companies.]</p><p>But absent any of the major principal companies in attendance, reporters pressed White House spokeswoman Karine Jean-Pierreon the participation of Mozilla CEO Mitchell Baker and Sonos CEO Patrick Spence to represent the views of the tech industry.</p><p>Sonos and Google are locked in a series of lawsuits against one another over speaker technology since 2020. Sonos called two suits filed last month by Google an &#34;intimidation tactic&#34; intended to &#34;retaliate against Sonos for speaking out against Google&#39;s monopolistic practices&#34; of royalty payments.</p><p>Nonprofit Mozilla, whose Firefox web browser competes with the likes of Google, has repeatedly clashed with Big Tech. On Friday, the company&#39;s chief security officer, Marshall Erwin, urged federal regulators to crack down on internet giants and browser makers that don&#39;t protect users&#39; privacy.</p><p>&#34;Privacy online is a mess, consumers are stuck in this vicious cycle in which their data is collected, often without their understanding, and then used to manipulate them,&#34; Erwin said during an FTC forum on commercial surveillance and data security.</p><p>&#34;The way that we see the roundtable today, it is, again, the largest roundtable that we have seen from this administration to deal with tech,&#34; Jean-Pierresaid. &#34;What you should take out from today, or take away from today, is that, you know, the president&#39;s going to and has long called for fundamental legislative reforms to address real issues. And so we&#39;re going to continue to do that.&#34;</p><p>The elusive reply came a day before Biden met in Ohio with Intel Corp. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/INTC\">$(INTC)$</a> CEO Pat Gelsinger at a groundbreaking ceremony for Intel&#39;s new $20 billion semiconductor manufacturing facility weeks after Congress passed the $280 billion Chips and Science Act in July.</p><p>&#34;The future of the chip industry is going to be made in America,&#34; Biden said at the event, a White House pre-midterms push to tout new funding for manufacturing and infrastructure. &#34;The industrial <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MDWT\">Midwest</a> is back.&#34;</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BK4529":"IDC概念","AMZN":"亚马逊","BK4539":"次新股","BK4516":"特朗普概念","TERN":"Terns Pharmaceuticals, Inc.","BK4554":"元宇宙及AR概念","BK4515":"5G概念","BK4532":"文艺复兴科技持仓","TWTR":"Twitter","BK4553":"喜马拉雅资本持仓","BK4191":"家用电器","BK4571":"数字音乐概念","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","BK4507":"流媒体概念","BK4139":"生物科技","BK4576":"AR","BK4533":"AQR资本管理(全球第二大对冲基金)","SONO":"搜诺思公司","BK4575":"芯片概念","GOOG":"谷歌","BK4566":"资本集团","BK4536":"外卖概念","BK4525":"远程办公概念","GOOGL":"谷歌A","BK4524":"宅经济概念","BK4535":"淡马锡持仓","BOLT":"Bolt Biotherapeutics, Inc.","BK4559":"巴菲特持仓","BK4527":"明星科技股","BK4538":"云计算","BK4077":"互动媒体与服务","BK4501":"段永平概念","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓","AAPL":"苹果","INTC":"英特尔","BK4141":"半导体产品","BK4503":"景林资产持仓","BK4551":"寇图资本持仓","BK4574":"无人驾驶","BK4122":"互联网与直销零售","UBER":"优步","BK4022":"陆运","BK4573":"虚拟现实","BK4170":"电脑硬件、储存设备及电脑周边","CRCT":"Cricut, Inc.","BK4512":"苹果概念","BK4078":"消费电子产品","QNETCN":"纳斯达克中美互联网老虎指数","BK4548":"巴美列捷福持仓","BK4514":"搜索引擎"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2266804526","content_text":"President Joe Biden's administration issued a checklist of actions needed to reign in Big Tech on Thursday, after a roundtable \"listening session\" on issues within the technology industry.But administration officials were not \"listening\" to the companies that are the targets of many of the desired actions -- Google parent Alphabet Inc. $(GOOGL)$(GOOGL), Amazon.com Inc. $(AMZN)$, Apple Inc. $(AAPL)$and Facebook parent company Meta Platforms Inc. $(META.UK)$ The only representatives of the tech industry in attendance were the chief executives of Mozilla Corp. and Sonos Inc. $(SONO)$\"The rise of tech platforms has introduced new and difficult challenges, from the tragic acts of violence linked to toxic online cultures, to deteriorating mental health and well-being, to basic rights of Americans and communities worldwide suffering from the rise of tech platforms big and small,\" the White House said in a statement after convening 16 experts -- most of them administration employees -- to discuss technology.None of the Big Tech companies replied to request for comment on the listening session, but people familiar with the thinking at two of the companies weren't entirely surprised. They noted increased actions by the administration to hold social-media companies and purveyors of large digital platforms more accountable with the chances of a Senate vote seemingly dwindling by the hour.Industry analysts, however, expressed disappointment at an exclusive, private meeting that recommended punitive actions against the industry's biggest players without offering a seat at the table. The most controversial reform mentioned on the administration's list called for \"the removal of special protections for large tech platforms,\" including changing Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. The section generally provides website platforms immunity from third-party content.\"Section 230 provides critical protections for platforms of all sizes to moderate content and take down harmful posts, and our research confirms these protections are most important for smaller sites,\" Chamber of Progress CEO Adam Kovacevich said. The trade group is funded by Amazon, Meta, Google, Apple, Twitter Inc. (TWTR), Uber Technologies Inc. $(UBER)$ and others.Six broad goals listed by the White House mirror legislation slowly wending its way through Congress, the latest indication of a growing crackdown by the White House on high tech's influence while legislation wallows in the Senate and House. The Justice Department is expected to file antitrust lawsuits against Google for its online-ad business and Apple for its dominant App Store in coming weeks, according to reports in The Wall Street Journal, Politico and elsewhere.Social media platforms -- in particular, Meta, Twitter, TikTok and YouTube -- have been identified as the scourge of politicians who are playing to popular sentiment for reining in digital-data collectors such as Meta and Amazon. Those two companies are prime targets of the Federal Trade Commission.Congressional inaction was reflected earlier this week when a flustered Sen. Amy Klobuchar, a Minnesota Democrat who is author of a bill to tamp down the power of powerful digital platform landlords like Apple and Facebook, claimed an \"incredible onslaught of money\" has been an obstacle to passing the legislation.\"What has slowed us down is the incredible onslaught of money, and that's what happens with monopolies,\" Klobuchar, author of the American Innovation and Choice Online Act, said Tuesday at the Code Conference in Los Angeles. \"The senators are talking about it, about the ads running in each state.\"Organizations funded by the technology industry have plowed more than $200 million on political ads and other lobbying efforts since the beginning of 2021, according to ad-tracking service AdImpact and others.Klobuchar, who has written a book on antitrust reform and chaired the Senate Judiciary Committee's hearings on anticompetitive business practices for more than a year, has furiously pushed for a full Senate vote on her landmark bill as time melts with each passing day in the current legislative session. [The White House said Thursday it was encouraged to see bipartisan interest in Congress to adopt antitrust legislation to address the power of major U.S. tech companies.]But absent any of the major principal companies in attendance, reporters pressed White House spokeswoman Karine Jean-Pierreon the participation of Mozilla CEO Mitchell Baker and Sonos CEO Patrick Spence to represent the views of the tech industry.Sonos and Google are locked in a series of lawsuits against one another over speaker technology since 2020. Sonos called two suits filed last month by Google an \"intimidation tactic\" intended to \"retaliate against Sonos for speaking out against Google's monopolistic practices\" of royalty payments.Nonprofit Mozilla, whose Firefox web browser competes with the likes of Google, has repeatedly clashed with Big Tech. On Friday, the company's chief security officer, Marshall Erwin, urged federal regulators to crack down on internet giants and browser makers that don't protect users' privacy.\"Privacy online is a mess, consumers are stuck in this vicious cycle in which their data is collected, often without their understanding, and then used to manipulate them,\" Erwin said during an FTC forum on commercial surveillance and data security.\"The way that we see the roundtable today, it is, again, the largest roundtable that we have seen from this administration to deal with tech,\" Jean-Pierresaid. \"What you should take out from today, or take away from today, is that, you know, the president's going to and has long called for fundamental legislative reforms to address real issues. And so we're going to continue to do that.\"The elusive reply came a day before Biden met in Ohio with Intel Corp. $(INTC)$ CEO Pat Gelsinger at a groundbreaking ceremony for Intel's new $20 billion semiconductor manufacturing facility weeks after Congress passed the $280 billion Chips and Science Act in July.\"The future of the chip industry is going to be made in America,\" Biden said at the event, a White House pre-midterms push to tout new funding for manufacturing and infrastructure. \"The industrial Midwest is back.\"","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":260,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9935009989,"gmtCreate":1663000453742,"gmtModify":1676537179945,"author":{"id":"4093501445886610","authorId":"4093501445886610","name":"mrzh","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/c26fff9effd22bd1b2fc753bc22da7f9","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4093501445886610","authorIdStr":"4093501445886610"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Kept repeating quantitative, means something","listText":"Kept repeating quantitative, means something","text":"Kept repeating quantitative, means something","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9935009989","repostId":"2266390451","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2266390451","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1662973466,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2266390451?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-09-12 17:04","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Stock-Market Wild Card: What Investors Need to Know as Fed Shrinks Balance Sheet at Faster Pace","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2266390451","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"Quantitative easing is credited with juicing equity returns and boosting other speculative assets by","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Quantitative easing is credited with juicing equity returns and boosting other speculative assets by flooding markets with liquidity as the Federal Reserve snapped up trillions of dollars in bonds after the financial crisis and amid the coronavirus pandemic. Investors and policy makers may be underestimating what happens as the tide goes out.</p><p>&#34;I don&#39;t know if the Fed or anybody else truly understands the impact of QT just yet,&#34; said Aidan Garrib, head of global macro strategy and research at Montreal-based PGM Global, in a phone interview.</p><p>The Fed, in fact, began slowly shrinking its balance sheet -- a process known as quantitative tightening, or QT -- earlier this year. Now it&#39;s accelerating the process, as planned, and it&#39;s making some market watchers nervous.</p><p>A lack of historical experience around the process is raising the uncertainty level. Meanwhile, research that increasingly credits quantitative easing, or QE, with giving asset prices a lift logically points to the potential for QT to do the opposite.</p><p>Since 2010, QE has explained about 50% of the movement in market price-to-earnings multiples, said Savita Subramanian, equity and quant strategist at Bank of America, in an Aug. 15 research note (see chart below).</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c7ba2d5fe717396f178495c88a6ba8f6\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"748\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>&#34;Based on the strong linear relationship between QE and S&amp;P 500 returns from 2010 to 2019, QT through 2023 would translate into a 7 percentage-point drop in the S&amp;P 500 from here,&#34; she wrote.</p><p>In quantitative easing, a central bank creates credit that&#39;s used to buy securities on the open market. Purchases of long-dated bonds are intended to drive down yields, which is seen enhancing appetite for risky assets as investors look elsewhere for higher returns. QE creates new reserves on bank balance sheets. The added cushion gives banks, which must hold reserves in line with regulations, more room to lend or to finance trading activity by hedge funds and other financial market participants, further enhancing market liquidity.</p><p>The way to think about the relationship between QE and equities is to note that as central banks undertake QE, it raises forward earnings expectations. That, in turn, lowers the equity risk premium, which is the extra return investors demand to hold risky equities over safe Treasurys, noted PGM Global&#39;s Garrib. Investors are willing to venture further out on the risk curve, he said, which explains the surge in earnings-free &#34;dream stocks&#34; and other highly speculative assets amid the QE flood as the economy and stock market recovered from the pandemic in 2021.</p><p>However, with the economy recovering and inflation rising the Fed began shrinking its balance sheet in June, and is doubling the pace in September to its maximum rate of $95 billion per month. This will be accomplished by letting $60 billion of Treasurys and $35 billion of mortgage backed securities roll off the balance sheet without reinvestment. At that pace, the balance sheet could shrink by $1 trillion in a year.</p><p>The unwinding of the Fed&#39;s balance sheet that began in 2017 after the economy had long recovered from the 2008-2009 crisis was supposed to be as exciting as &#34;watching paint dry,&#34; then-Federal Reserve Chairwoman Janet Yellen said at the time. It was a ho-hum affair until the fall of 2019, when the Fed had to inject cash into malfunctioning money markets. QE then resumed in 2020 in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p>More economists and analysts have been ringing alarm bells over the possibility of a repeat of the 2019 liquidity crunch.</p><p>&#34;If the past repeats, the shrinking of the central bank&#39;s balance sheet is not likely to be an entirely benign process and will require careful monitoring of the banking sector&#39;s on-and off-balance sheet demandable liabilities,&#34; warned Raghuram Rajan, former governor of the Reserve Bank of India and former chief economist at the International Monetary Fund, and other researchers in a paper presented at the Kansas City Fed&#39;s annual symposium in Jackson Hole, Wyoming, last month.</p><p>Hedge-fund giant Bridgewater Associates in June warned that QT was contributing to a &#34;liquidity hole&#34; in the bond market.</p><p>The slow pace of the wind-down so far and the composition of the balance-sheet reduction have muted the effect of QT so far, but that&#39;s set to change, Garrib said.</p><p>He noted that QT is usually described in the context of the asset side of the Fed&#39;s balance sheet, but it&#39;s the liability side that matters to financial markets. And so far, reductions in Fed liabilities have been concentrated in the Treasury General Account, or TGA, which effectively serves as the government&#39;s checking account.</p><p>That&#39;s actually served to improve market liquidity he explained, as it means the government has been spending money to pay for goods and services. It won&#39;t last.</p><p>The Treasury plans to increase debt issuance in coming months, which will boost the size of the TGA. The Fed will actively redeem T-bills when coupon maturities aren&#39;t sufficient to meet their monthly balance sheet reductions as part of QT, Garrib said.</p><p>The Treasury will be effectively taking money out of economy and putting it into the government&#39;s checking account -- a net drag -- as it issues more debt. That will put more pressure on the private sector to absorb those Treasurys, which means less money to put into other assets, he said.</p><p>The worry for stock-market investors is that high inflation means the Fed won&#39;t have the ability to pivot on a dime as it did during past periods of market stress, said Garrib, who argued that the tightening by the Fed and other major central banks could set up the stock market for a test of the June lows in a drop that could go &#34;significantly below&#34; those levels.</p><p>The main takeaway, he said, is &#34;don&#39;t fight the Fed on the way up and don&#39;t fight the Fed on the way down.&#34;</p><p>Stocks ended higher on Friday, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average , S&amp;P 500  and Nasdaq Composite  snapping a three-week run of weekly losses.</p><p>The highlight of the week ahead will likely come on Tuesday, with the release of the August consumer-price index, which will be parsed for signs inflation is heading back down.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Stock-Market Wild Card: What Investors Need to Know as Fed Shrinks Balance Sheet at Faster Pace</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nStock-Market Wild Card: What Investors Need to Know as Fed Shrinks Balance Sheet at Faster Pace\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-09-12 17:04</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>Quantitative easing is credited with juicing equity returns and boosting other speculative assets by flooding markets with liquidity as the Federal Reserve snapped up trillions of dollars in bonds after the financial crisis and amid the coronavirus pandemic. Investors and policy makers may be underestimating what happens as the tide goes out.</p><p>&#34;I don&#39;t know if the Fed or anybody else truly understands the impact of QT just yet,&#34; said Aidan Garrib, head of global macro strategy and research at Montreal-based PGM Global, in a phone interview.</p><p>The Fed, in fact, began slowly shrinking its balance sheet -- a process known as quantitative tightening, or QT -- earlier this year. Now it&#39;s accelerating the process, as planned, and it&#39;s making some market watchers nervous.</p><p>A lack of historical experience around the process is raising the uncertainty level. Meanwhile, research that increasingly credits quantitative easing, or QE, with giving asset prices a lift logically points to the potential for QT to do the opposite.</p><p>Since 2010, QE has explained about 50% of the movement in market price-to-earnings multiples, said Savita Subramanian, equity and quant strategist at Bank of America, in an Aug. 15 research note (see chart below).</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c7ba2d5fe717396f178495c88a6ba8f6\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"748\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>&#34;Based on the strong linear relationship between QE and S&amp;P 500 returns from 2010 to 2019, QT through 2023 would translate into a 7 percentage-point drop in the S&amp;P 500 from here,&#34; she wrote.</p><p>In quantitative easing, a central bank creates credit that&#39;s used to buy securities on the open market. Purchases of long-dated bonds are intended to drive down yields, which is seen enhancing appetite for risky assets as investors look elsewhere for higher returns. QE creates new reserves on bank balance sheets. The added cushion gives banks, which must hold reserves in line with regulations, more room to lend or to finance trading activity by hedge funds and other financial market participants, further enhancing market liquidity.</p><p>The way to think about the relationship between QE and equities is to note that as central banks undertake QE, it raises forward earnings expectations. That, in turn, lowers the equity risk premium, which is the extra return investors demand to hold risky equities over safe Treasurys, noted PGM Global&#39;s Garrib. Investors are willing to venture further out on the risk curve, he said, which explains the surge in earnings-free &#34;dream stocks&#34; and other highly speculative assets amid the QE flood as the economy and stock market recovered from the pandemic in 2021.</p><p>However, with the economy recovering and inflation rising the Fed began shrinking its balance sheet in June, and is doubling the pace in September to its maximum rate of $95 billion per month. This will be accomplished by letting $60 billion of Treasurys and $35 billion of mortgage backed securities roll off the balance sheet without reinvestment. At that pace, the balance sheet could shrink by $1 trillion in a year.</p><p>The unwinding of the Fed&#39;s balance sheet that began in 2017 after the economy had long recovered from the 2008-2009 crisis was supposed to be as exciting as &#34;watching paint dry,&#34; then-Federal Reserve Chairwoman Janet Yellen said at the time. It was a ho-hum affair until the fall of 2019, when the Fed had to inject cash into malfunctioning money markets. QE then resumed in 2020 in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p>More economists and analysts have been ringing alarm bells over the possibility of a repeat of the 2019 liquidity crunch.</p><p>&#34;If the past repeats, the shrinking of the central bank&#39;s balance sheet is not likely to be an entirely benign process and will require careful monitoring of the banking sector&#39;s on-and off-balance sheet demandable liabilities,&#34; warned Raghuram Rajan, former governor of the Reserve Bank of India and former chief economist at the International Monetary Fund, and other researchers in a paper presented at the Kansas City Fed&#39;s annual symposium in Jackson Hole, Wyoming, last month.</p><p>Hedge-fund giant Bridgewater Associates in June warned that QT was contributing to a &#34;liquidity hole&#34; in the bond market.</p><p>The slow pace of the wind-down so far and the composition of the balance-sheet reduction have muted the effect of QT so far, but that&#39;s set to change, Garrib said.</p><p>He noted that QT is usually described in the context of the asset side of the Fed&#39;s balance sheet, but it&#39;s the liability side that matters to financial markets. And so far, reductions in Fed liabilities have been concentrated in the Treasury General Account, or TGA, which effectively serves as the government&#39;s checking account.</p><p>That&#39;s actually served to improve market liquidity he explained, as it means the government has been spending money to pay for goods and services. It won&#39;t last.</p><p>The Treasury plans to increase debt issuance in coming months, which will boost the size of the TGA. The Fed will actively redeem T-bills when coupon maturities aren&#39;t sufficient to meet their monthly balance sheet reductions as part of QT, Garrib said.</p><p>The Treasury will be effectively taking money out of economy and putting it into the government&#39;s checking account -- a net drag -- as it issues more debt. That will put more pressure on the private sector to absorb those Treasurys, which means less money to put into other assets, he said.</p><p>The worry for stock-market investors is that high inflation means the Fed won&#39;t have the ability to pivot on a dime as it did during past periods of market stress, said Garrib, who argued that the tightening by the Fed and other major central banks could set up the stock market for a test of the June lows in a drop that could go &#34;significantly below&#34; those levels.</p><p>The main takeaway, he said, is &#34;don&#39;t fight the Fed on the way up and don&#39;t fight the Fed on the way down.&#34;</p><p>Stocks ended higher on Friday, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average , S&amp;P 500  and Nasdaq Composite  snapping a three-week run of weekly losses.</p><p>The highlight of the week ahead will likely come on Tuesday, with the release of the August consumer-price index, which will be parsed for signs inflation is heading back down.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2266390451","content_text":"Quantitative easing is credited with juicing equity returns and boosting other speculative assets by flooding markets with liquidity as the Federal Reserve snapped up trillions of dollars in bonds after the financial crisis and amid the coronavirus pandemic. Investors and policy makers may be underestimating what happens as the tide goes out.\"I don't know if the Fed or anybody else truly understands the impact of QT just yet,\" said Aidan Garrib, head of global macro strategy and research at Montreal-based PGM Global, in a phone interview.The Fed, in fact, began slowly shrinking its balance sheet -- a process known as quantitative tightening, or QT -- earlier this year. Now it's accelerating the process, as planned, and it's making some market watchers nervous.A lack of historical experience around the process is raising the uncertainty level. Meanwhile, research that increasingly credits quantitative easing, or QE, with giving asset prices a lift logically points to the potential for QT to do the opposite.Since 2010, QE has explained about 50% of the movement in market price-to-earnings multiples, said Savita Subramanian, equity and quant strategist at Bank of America, in an Aug. 15 research note (see chart below).\"Based on the strong linear relationship between QE and S&P 500 returns from 2010 to 2019, QT through 2023 would translate into a 7 percentage-point drop in the S&P 500 from here,\" she wrote.In quantitative easing, a central bank creates credit that's used to buy securities on the open market. Purchases of long-dated bonds are intended to drive down yields, which is seen enhancing appetite for risky assets as investors look elsewhere for higher returns. QE creates new reserves on bank balance sheets. The added cushion gives banks, which must hold reserves in line with regulations, more room to lend or to finance trading activity by hedge funds and other financial market participants, further enhancing market liquidity.The way to think about the relationship between QE and equities is to note that as central banks undertake QE, it raises forward earnings expectations. That, in turn, lowers the equity risk premium, which is the extra return investors demand to hold risky equities over safe Treasurys, noted PGM Global's Garrib. Investors are willing to venture further out on the risk curve, he said, which explains the surge in earnings-free \"dream stocks\" and other highly speculative assets amid the QE flood as the economy and stock market recovered from the pandemic in 2021.However, with the economy recovering and inflation rising the Fed began shrinking its balance sheet in June, and is doubling the pace in September to its maximum rate of $95 billion per month. This will be accomplished by letting $60 billion of Treasurys and $35 billion of mortgage backed securities roll off the balance sheet without reinvestment. At that pace, the balance sheet could shrink by $1 trillion in a year.The unwinding of the Fed's balance sheet that began in 2017 after the economy had long recovered from the 2008-2009 crisis was supposed to be as exciting as \"watching paint dry,\" then-Federal Reserve Chairwoman Janet Yellen said at the time. It was a ho-hum affair until the fall of 2019, when the Fed had to inject cash into malfunctioning money markets. QE then resumed in 2020 in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.More economists and analysts have been ringing alarm bells over the possibility of a repeat of the 2019 liquidity crunch.\"If the past repeats, the shrinking of the central bank's balance sheet is not likely to be an entirely benign process and will require careful monitoring of the banking sector's on-and off-balance sheet demandable liabilities,\" warned Raghuram Rajan, former governor of the Reserve Bank of India and former chief economist at the International Monetary Fund, and other researchers in a paper presented at the Kansas City Fed's annual symposium in Jackson Hole, Wyoming, last month.Hedge-fund giant Bridgewater Associates in June warned that QT was contributing to a \"liquidity hole\" in the bond market.The slow pace of the wind-down so far and the composition of the balance-sheet reduction have muted the effect of QT so far, but that's set to change, Garrib said.He noted that QT is usually described in the context of the asset side of the Fed's balance sheet, but it's the liability side that matters to financial markets. And so far, reductions in Fed liabilities have been concentrated in the Treasury General Account, or TGA, which effectively serves as the government's checking account.That's actually served to improve market liquidity he explained, as it means the government has been spending money to pay for goods and services. It won't last.The Treasury plans to increase debt issuance in coming months, which will boost the size of the TGA. The Fed will actively redeem T-bills when coupon maturities aren't sufficient to meet their monthly balance sheet reductions as part of QT, Garrib said.The Treasury will be effectively taking money out of economy and putting it into the government's checking account -- a net drag -- as it issues more debt. That will put more pressure on the private sector to absorb those Treasurys, which means less money to put into other assets, he said.The worry for stock-market investors is that high inflation means the Fed won't have the ability to pivot on a dime as it did during past periods of market stress, said Garrib, who argued that the tightening by the Fed and other major central banks could set up the stock market for a test of the June lows in a drop that could go \"significantly below\" those levels.The main takeaway, he said, is \"don't fight the Fed on the way up and don't fight the Fed on the way down.\"Stocks ended higher on Friday, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average , S&P 500  and Nasdaq Composite  snapping a three-week run of weekly losses.The highlight of the week ahead will likely come on Tuesday, with the release of the August consumer-price index, which will be parsed for signs inflation is heading back down.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":214,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9998708765,"gmtCreate":1661052735958,"gmtModify":1676536445827,"author":{"id":"4093501445886610","authorId":"4093501445886610","name":"mrzh","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/c26fff9effd22bd1b2fc753bc22da7f9","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4093501445886610","authorIdStr":"4093501445886610"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Lovely","listText":"Lovely","text":"Lovely","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9998708765","repostId":"2260353209","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2260353209","pubTimestamp":1661042935,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2260353209?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-08-21 08:48","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Amazon Is \"the Dark Horse\" in Streaming As Tech Giants \"Have Nothing to Lose\": Analyst","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2260353209","media":"Yahoo Finance","summary":"The streaming wars have intensified with retail giant Walmart (WMT) officially partnering with Param","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>The streaming wars have intensified with retail giant Walmart (WMT) officially partnering with Paramount Global (PARA), while YouTube TV (GOOGL) is reportedly set to launch an online channel store to compete with the likes of Roku (ROKU), Amazon (AMZN), and Apple (AAPL).</p><p>But with so much competition and a plethora of new strategies peppering the landscape, one platform is standing out to analysts: Amazon Prime Video.</p><p>&#34;From a growth perspective, I actually think Amazon can really be the dark horse,&#34; Geetha Ranganathan, Bloomberg Intelligence senior media analyst, told Yahoo Finance.</p><p>She added the service &#34;can do a lot of damage,&#34; citing its exclusive 15-game &#34;Thursday Night Football&#34; package. The 11-year agreement with the NFL will cost the company a reported $1 billion per year.</p><p>The analyst also called out the platform&#39;s highly-anticipated &#34;The Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power&#34; series, which will roll out eight episodes beginning in early September.</p><p>According to Variety, Amazon plans to spend $465 million to produce the <i>first</i> season of the upcoming show. For context, Peter Jackson’s entire &#34;Lord of the Rings&#34; movie trilogy cost $281 million.</p><p>&#34;Money is no object for Amazon,&#34; Ranganathan stated, adding the tech giant is &#34;happy to be a loss leader&#34; in streaming as it focuses on &#34;the long game.&#34;</p><p>As the streamer looks to expand, a new report from The Wall Street Journal notes Amazon is meeting with top Hollywood movie executives to beef up its film division.</p><p>Amazon Studios has reportedly held conversations with Netflix&#39;s film head, Scott Stuber. The company also held discussions with former Paramount Pictures executive Emma Watts.</p><h2><b>&#39;Tech giants have nothing to lose&#39; </b></h2><p>Ranganathan reiterated that both Amazon&#39;s and Apple&#39;s entrance into the streaming wars &#34;has made the competition so much more intense.&#34;</p><p>&#34;The big risk for the established media companies is that they have a model that they have to prove to investors, and ensure that they are getting returns on investments.&#34;</p><p>&#34;That becomes almost burdensome for them,&#34; the analyst explained.</p><p>Conversely, &#34;tech giants have nothing to lose&#34; due to other services &#34;keeping people in their ecosystem.&#34;</p><p>Streaming is &#34;more of an aggregator-slash-ecosystem play for a company like Amazon or Apple,&#34; she continued, emphasizing it as add-on service to increase the stickiness on the respective platform.</p><p>Cowen media analyst Doug Cruetz agreed, noting, &#34;Amazon and Apple have a lot of businesses and a lot of people on their platform — the economics compared to other players are totally different.&#34;</p><p>He added, &#34;If Apple loses money on its streaming product but fills a lot more iPhones, that&#39;s okay.&#34;</p><p>&#34;Same with Amazon. It&#39;s fine losing money on video since streaming is really just a pure cost center to them because they&#39;re not monetizing it directly.&#34;</p><p>Still, Amazon has packed on the hits in recent months with season 3 of &#34;The Boys&#34; and Chris Pratt&#39;s newly released &#34;The Terminal List&#34; surging in popularity.</p><p>According to Nielsen, &#34;The Terminal List&#34; (despite weak critic reviews) racked up an impressive 1.6 billion minutes of streaming during the July 4 to July 10 viewing window, after premiering on July 1.</p><p>The military thriller came in second only behind &#34;Stranger Things,&#39;&#34; which secured 4.8 billion minutes over that same time period.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Amazon Is \"the Dark Horse\" in Streaming As Tech Giants \"Have Nothing to Lose\": Analyst</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAmazon Is \"the Dark Horse\" in Streaming As Tech Giants \"Have Nothing to Lose\": Analyst\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-08-21 08:48 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/amazon-is-the-dark-horse-in-streaming-tech-giants-have-nothing-to-lose-says-analyst-161427281.html><strong>Yahoo Finance</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The streaming wars have intensified with retail giant Walmart (WMT) officially partnering with Paramount Global (PARA), while YouTube TV (GOOGL) is reportedly set to launch an online channel store to ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/amazon-is-the-dark-horse-in-streaming-tech-giants-have-nothing-to-lose-says-analyst-161427281.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AMZN":"亚马逊"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/amazon-is-the-dark-horse-in-streaming-tech-giants-have-nothing-to-lose-says-analyst-161427281.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2260353209","content_text":"The streaming wars have intensified with retail giant Walmart (WMT) officially partnering with Paramount Global (PARA), while YouTube TV (GOOGL) is reportedly set to launch an online channel store to compete with the likes of Roku (ROKU), Amazon (AMZN), and Apple (AAPL).But with so much competition and a plethora of new strategies peppering the landscape, one platform is standing out to analysts: Amazon Prime Video.\"From a growth perspective, I actually think Amazon can really be the dark horse,\" Geetha Ranganathan, Bloomberg Intelligence senior media analyst, told Yahoo Finance.She added the service \"can do a lot of damage,\" citing its exclusive 15-game \"Thursday Night Football\" package. The 11-year agreement with the NFL will cost the company a reported $1 billion per year.The analyst also called out the platform's highly-anticipated \"The Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power\" series, which will roll out eight episodes beginning in early September.According to Variety, Amazon plans to spend $465 million to produce the first season of the upcoming show. For context, Peter Jackson’s entire \"Lord of the Rings\" movie trilogy cost $281 million.\"Money is no object for Amazon,\" Ranganathan stated, adding the tech giant is \"happy to be a loss leader\" in streaming as it focuses on \"the long game.\"As the streamer looks to expand, a new report from The Wall Street Journal notes Amazon is meeting with top Hollywood movie executives to beef up its film division.Amazon Studios has reportedly held conversations with Netflix's film head, Scott Stuber. The company also held discussions with former Paramount Pictures executive Emma Watts.'Tech giants have nothing to lose' Ranganathan reiterated that both Amazon's and Apple's entrance into the streaming wars \"has made the competition so much more intense.\"\"The big risk for the established media companies is that they have a model that they have to prove to investors, and ensure that they are getting returns on investments.\"\"That becomes almost burdensome for them,\" the analyst explained.Conversely, \"tech giants have nothing to lose\" due to other services \"keeping people in their ecosystem.\"Streaming is \"more of an aggregator-slash-ecosystem play for a company like Amazon or Apple,\" she continued, emphasizing it as add-on service to increase the stickiness on the respective platform.Cowen media analyst Doug Cruetz agreed, noting, \"Amazon and Apple have a lot of businesses and a lot of people on their platform — the economics compared to other players are totally different.\"He added, \"If Apple loses money on its streaming product but fills a lot more iPhones, that's okay.\"\"Same with Amazon. It's fine losing money on video since streaming is really just a pure cost center to them because they're not monetizing it directly.\"Still, Amazon has packed on the hits in recent months with season 3 of \"The Boys\" and Chris Pratt's newly released \"The Terminal List\" surging in popularity.According to Nielsen, \"The Terminal List\" (despite weak critic reviews) racked up an impressive 1.6 billion minutes of streaming during the July 4 to July 10 viewing window, after premiering on July 1.The military thriller came in second only behind \"Stranger Things,'\" which secured 4.8 billion minutes over that same time period.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":451,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9907218323,"gmtCreate":1660195316864,"gmtModify":1703478998138,"author":{"id":"4093501445886610","authorId":"4093501445886610","name":"mrzh","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/c26fff9effd22bd1b2fc753bc22da7f9","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4093501445886610","authorIdStr":"4093501445886610"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Nice","listText":"Nice","text":"Nice","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9907218323","repostId":"2258291275","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2258291275","pubTimestamp":1660180913,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2258291275?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-08-11 09:21","market":"us","language":"en","title":"3 Reasons to Buy Apple Stock Now","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2258291275","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"The tech company hasn't said its last word just yet.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Is there more fuel left in <b>Apple</b>&#39;s growth engine? Because the company has already delivered market-beating returns for years and is near the top of the exclusive group of trillion-dollar companies, some investors are wondering if it&#39;s time to cash in. Others still see signs that Apple isn&#39;t done growing just yet.</p><p>The Silicon Valley giant produced more evidence of its still-solid prospects when it released its latest quarterly update late last month. In it were clues that there are at least three reasons to think Apple isn&#39;t done growing yet and there is still time to get in on outsized returns. Let&#39;s take a look at those reasons.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4d707ca46aab73e16e1d024655ca86c8\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"449\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>AAPL data by YCharts</span></p><h2>1. Despite economic headwinds, Apple is managing to do well</h2><p>Fears of a coming (or already present) recession are not unfounded, and inflation is eroding wage gains and savings. In a macroeconomic environment such as this, consumers tend to hold off spending on things they may want but don&#39;t need. That could easily describe many of Apple&#39;s products. A new smartphone is nice, as is a sleek pair of Bluetooth headphones. In reality, no one <i>needs</i> brand new versions of those things that often sell for well-above-average prices.</p><p>This would suggest Apple is going to have a rough go of it. And while these challenging headwinds have certainly impacted its earnings, the tech giant is managing surprisingly well. In its latest quarterly update (the third quarter of its fiscal year 2022, ending on June 25), Apple&#39;s net sales were up by about 2% year over year to $83 billion.</p><p>This modest top-line growth amid the issues Apple is battling is commendable. Apple&#39;s earnings per share did decrease to $1.20, down from the $1.30 reported during the year-ago period. Rising costs and expenses, partly due to inflation, may have played a role here. Still, overall, Apple&#39;s results were pretty solid. The company owed much of this success to its signature device, the iPhone.</p><h2>2. Long live the iPhone</h2><p>Apple&#39;s iPhone has been its major source of revenue for over a decade now. It arguably no longer generates the buzz it once did; the tech industry used to stop everything and listen every time Apple would announce a new version of its prized device. But demand for the iPhone remains strong. During Apple&#39;s third quarter, revenue from this segment rose 2.8% to $40.7 billion.</p><p>According to CEO Tim Cook, &#34;Looking at the data on iPhone for the June quarter, there&#39;s not obvious evidence in there that there&#39;s a macroeconomic headwind. I&#39;m not saying that there&#39;s not one. I&#39;m saying that the data doesn&#39;t show it where we can clearly see that in the Wearables, Home and Accessories area.&#34;</p><p>Selling more iPhones isn&#39;t just a matter of generating revenue for Apple. It also helps the company grow its installed base, provided a customer not previously part of Apple&#39;s network purchases a new device. That seems to be at least part of the story, as Apple reported that its installed base reached all-time highs across all its products during its latest quarter.</p><p>The long-run implications of these developments are significant. The more people are plugged into Apple&#39;s services network, the more it can monetize these users, and the more it can grow its services revenue. During Apple&#39;s third quarter, the tech giant&#39;s services segment grew faster than the rest of its business, recording total sales of $19.6 billion, 12.1% higher than the year-ago period.</p><h2>3. Margins are making a difference for Apple</h2><p>A key advantage of Apple&#39;s services segment is its higher margins. Although the services segment is still far behind in sales, Apple has made a concerted effort over the years to improve its margins, and this unit has helped these initiatives. During its third quarter, Apple&#39;s products business recorded a gross margin of 34.5%, down 1.5 percentage points compared to the year-ago period.</p><p>However, the company&#39;s services segment saw its margins improve from 69.8% to 71.5%. That helped Apple&#39;s total gross margin remain flat year over year at 43.3%. Investors should look for Apple&#39;s margins to continue improving thanks to its services unit that is growing in importance.</p><h2>Buy Apple and forget</h2><p>Like the rest of the world, Apple is dealing with serious issues at the moment. But the company is not breaking under the weight of its (likely temporary) challenges -- not by a long shot. The customer loyalty it has built over the years is helping it grow sales, especially those of the iPhone. Apple boasts a valuable brand name that is second to none, be it in the technology sector or elsewhere.</p><p>Apple&#39;s services business is positively impacting the company&#39;s margins in a dynamic that will continue for many years. Overall, Apple still looks like an excellent long-term bet for patient investors. No wonder it is one of Warren Buffett&#39;s favorite stocks.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>3 Reasons to Buy Apple Stock Now</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n3 Reasons to Buy Apple Stock Now\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-08-11 09:21 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/08/10/3-reasons-to-buy-apple-stock-now/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Is there more fuel left in Apple's growth engine? Because the company has already delivered market-beating returns for years and is near the top of the exclusive group of trillion-dollar companies, ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/08/10/3-reasons-to-buy-apple-stock-now/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/08/10/3-reasons-to-buy-apple-stock-now/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2258291275","content_text":"Is there more fuel left in Apple's growth engine? Because the company has already delivered market-beating returns for years and is near the top of the exclusive group of trillion-dollar companies, some investors are wondering if it's time to cash in. Others still see signs that Apple isn't done growing just yet.The Silicon Valley giant produced more evidence of its still-solid prospects when it released its latest quarterly update late last month. In it were clues that there are at least three reasons to think Apple isn't done growing yet and there is still time to get in on outsized returns. Let's take a look at those reasons.AAPL data by YCharts1. Despite economic headwinds, Apple is managing to do wellFears of a coming (or already present) recession are not unfounded, and inflation is eroding wage gains and savings. In a macroeconomic environment such as this, consumers tend to hold off spending on things they may want but don't need. That could easily describe many of Apple's products. A new smartphone is nice, as is a sleek pair of Bluetooth headphones. In reality, no one needs brand new versions of those things that often sell for well-above-average prices.This would suggest Apple is going to have a rough go of it. And while these challenging headwinds have certainly impacted its earnings, the tech giant is managing surprisingly well. In its latest quarterly update (the third quarter of its fiscal year 2022, ending on June 25), Apple's net sales were up by about 2% year over year to $83 billion.This modest top-line growth amid the issues Apple is battling is commendable. Apple's earnings per share did decrease to $1.20, down from the $1.30 reported during the year-ago period. Rising costs and expenses, partly due to inflation, may have played a role here. Still, overall, Apple's results were pretty solid. The company owed much of this success to its signature device, the iPhone.2. Long live the iPhoneApple's iPhone has been its major source of revenue for over a decade now. It arguably no longer generates the buzz it once did; the tech industry used to stop everything and listen every time Apple would announce a new version of its prized device. But demand for the iPhone remains strong. During Apple's third quarter, revenue from this segment rose 2.8% to $40.7 billion.According to CEO Tim Cook, \"Looking at the data on iPhone for the June quarter, there's not obvious evidence in there that there's a macroeconomic headwind. I'm not saying that there's not one. I'm saying that the data doesn't show it where we can clearly see that in the Wearables, Home and Accessories area.\"Selling more iPhones isn't just a matter of generating revenue for Apple. It also helps the company grow its installed base, provided a customer not previously part of Apple's network purchases a new device. That seems to be at least part of the story, as Apple reported that its installed base reached all-time highs across all its products during its latest quarter.The long-run implications of these developments are significant. The more people are plugged into Apple's services network, the more it can monetize these users, and the more it can grow its services revenue. During Apple's third quarter, the tech giant's services segment grew faster than the rest of its business, recording total sales of $19.6 billion, 12.1% higher than the year-ago period.3. Margins are making a difference for AppleA key advantage of Apple's services segment is its higher margins. Although the services segment is still far behind in sales, Apple has made a concerted effort over the years to improve its margins, and this unit has helped these initiatives. During its third quarter, Apple's products business recorded a gross margin of 34.5%, down 1.5 percentage points compared to the year-ago period.However, the company's services segment saw its margins improve from 69.8% to 71.5%. That helped Apple's total gross margin remain flat year over year at 43.3%. Investors should look for Apple's margins to continue improving thanks to its services unit that is growing in importance.Buy Apple and forgetLike the rest of the world, Apple is dealing with serious issues at the moment. But the company is not breaking under the weight of its (likely temporary) challenges -- not by a long shot. The customer loyalty it has built over the years is helping it grow sales, especially those of the iPhone. Apple boasts a valuable brand name that is second to none, be it in the technology sector or elsewhere.Apple's services business is positively impacting the company's margins in a dynamic that will continue for many years. Overall, Apple still looks like an excellent long-term bet for patient investors. No wonder it is one of Warren Buffett's favorite stocks.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":261,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9907219707,"gmtCreate":1660195050911,"gmtModify":1703478994255,"author":{"id":"4093501445886610","authorId":"4093501445886610","name":"mrzh","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/c26fff9effd22bd1b2fc753bc22da7f9","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4093501445886610","authorIdStr":"4093501445886610"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9907219707","repostId":"2258224852","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2258224852","pubTimestamp":1660190080,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2258224852?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-08-11 11:54","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why Wednesday’s Jump in Tesla Shares Surprised Investors","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2258224852","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Musk may be selling shares, but investors aren't reading too much into it.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>KEY POINTS</b></p><ul><li>The Tesla CEO explained that he sold shares for what seems like a prudent reason.</li><li>Tesla has upgraded its critical Shanghai plant to be able to produce more than 1 million vehicles per year.</li></ul><p><b>What happened</b></p><p>Many investors would have expected <b>Tesla</b> shares to be sinking on Wednesday. But the opposite is happening. After an early jump of 5%, Tesla stock was still 3.9% higher as of closing.</p><p><b>So what</b></p><p>That move was a bit surprising after it was revealed yesterday that CEO Elon Musk sold almost $7 billion worth of his Tesla shares between Aug. 5 and Aug. 9. Musk&#39;s sales came at prices from about $838.5 to $912 per share.</p><p><b>Now what</b></p><p>While the share sales themselves in no way affect the shareholder value in Tesla, Musk is a widely followed CEO, and his actions -- and words -- have moved the stock in the past. Musk later addressed his followers on <b>Twitter</b> to say the sales were in preparation for the potential purchase of the social media company. He is in a lawsuit with the company trying to back out of the agreement he previously made for the acquisition.</p><p>But his sale of Tesla stock actually seems prudent in that context. If Musk loses the court case and is forced to acquire Twitter, he may need to come up with liquid capital. By selling some Tesla shares now, he avoids the potential for what he called &#34;an emergency sale of Tesla stock.&#34;</p><p>That likely helped boost investor sentiment with Tesla today. There was other news yesterday that was taken as a positive development. Reuters reported that Tesla sold a little more than 28,000 vehicles from its Shanghai plant in July. While that was a huge drop from the record 78,906 vehicles delivered in June, it wasn&#39;t unexpected.</p><p>July production was heavily impacted by shutdowns related to upgrades that are intended to boost capacity at the critical plant by nearly 30%. The factory should now be able to produce more than 1 million vehicles annually. That&#39;s more important news for Tesla investors who want to see it grow production by at least 50% per year for several more years. And it explains why the stock popped today, despite the news of Musk&#39;s share sales.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why Wednesday’s Jump in Tesla Shares Surprised Investors</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy Wednesday’s Jump in Tesla Shares Surprised Investors\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-08-11 11:54 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/08/10/why-todays-jump-in-tesla-shares-surprised-investor/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>KEY POINTSThe Tesla CEO explained that he sold shares for what seems like a prudent reason.Tesla has upgraded its critical Shanghai plant to be able to produce more than 1 million vehicles per year....</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/08/10/why-todays-jump-in-tesla-shares-surprised-investor/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/08/10/why-todays-jump-in-tesla-shares-surprised-investor/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2258224852","content_text":"KEY POINTSThe Tesla CEO explained that he sold shares for what seems like a prudent reason.Tesla has upgraded its critical Shanghai plant to be able to produce more than 1 million vehicles per year.What happenedMany investors would have expected Tesla shares to be sinking on Wednesday. But the opposite is happening. After an early jump of 5%, Tesla stock was still 3.9% higher as of closing.So whatThat move was a bit surprising after it was revealed yesterday that CEO Elon Musk sold almost $7 billion worth of his Tesla shares between Aug. 5 and Aug. 9. Musk's sales came at prices from about $838.5 to $912 per share.Now whatWhile the share sales themselves in no way affect the shareholder value in Tesla, Musk is a widely followed CEO, and his actions -- and words -- have moved the stock in the past. Musk later addressed his followers on Twitter to say the sales were in preparation for the potential purchase of the social media company. He is in a lawsuit with the company trying to back out of the agreement he previously made for the acquisition.But his sale of Tesla stock actually seems prudent in that context. If Musk loses the court case and is forced to acquire Twitter, he may need to come up with liquid capital. By selling some Tesla shares now, he avoids the potential for what he called \"an emergency sale of Tesla stock.\"That likely helped boost investor sentiment with Tesla today. There was other news yesterday that was taken as a positive development. Reuters reported that Tesla sold a little more than 28,000 vehicles from its Shanghai plant in July. While that was a huge drop from the record 78,906 vehicles delivered in June, it wasn't unexpected.July production was heavily impacted by shutdowns related to upgrades that are intended to boost capacity at the critical plant by nearly 30%. The factory should now be able to produce more than 1 million vehicles annually. That's more important news for Tesla investors who want to see it grow production by at least 50% per year for several more years. And it explains why the stock popped today, despite the news of Musk's share sales.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":340,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":9937804683,"gmtCreate":1663387455642,"gmtModify":1676537264024,"author":{"id":"4093501445886610","authorId":"4093501445886610","name":"mrzh","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/c26fff9effd22bd1b2fc753bc22da7f9","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4093501445886610","authorIdStr":"4093501445886610"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"That's great!","listText":"That's great!","text":"That's great!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9937804683","repostId":"2268610718","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2268610718","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1663369158,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2268610718?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-09-17 06:59","market":"us","language":"en","title":"US STOCKS-Wall St Drops to Two-Month Lows As Recession Fears Mount","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2268610718","media":"Reuters","summary":"* FedEx profit warning hits peers* All three major U.S. indexes post sharp weekly declines* Investors eye next week's Fed meeting* Indexes down: Dow 0.45%, S&P 0.72%, Nasdaq 0.90%NEW YORK, Sept 16 (Re","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>* FedEx profit warning hits peers</p><p>* All three major U.S. indexes post sharp weekly declines</p><p>* Investors eye next week&#39;s Fed meeting</p><p>* Indexes down: Dow 0.45%, S&amp;P 0.72%, Nasdaq 0.90%</p><p>NEW YORK, Sept 16 (Reuters) - U.S. stocks ended in the red on Friday, falling to two-month lows as a warning of impending global slowdown from FedEx hastened investors&#39; flight to safety at the conclusion of a tumultuous week.</p><p>All three major U.S. stock indexes slid to levels not touched since mid-July, with the S&amp;P 500 closing below 3,900, a closely watched support level.</p><p>Staggering past the finish line of a week rattled by inflation concerns, looming interest rate hikes and ominous economic warning signs, the S&amp;P 500 and the Nasdaq suffered their worst weekly percentage plunges since June.</p><p>&#34;It’s been a tough week. It feels Halloween came early&#34; said David Carter, managing director at JPMorgan in New York. &#34;We are facing in this toxic brew of high inflation, high interest rates and low growth, which isn’t good for stock or bond markets.&#34;</p><p>Risk-off sentiment went from simmer to boil in the wake of FedEx Corp&#39;s withdrawal of its earnings forecast late Thursday, citing signs of dampening global demand.</p><p>FedEx&#39;s move followed remarks from the World Bank and the IMF, both of which warned of an impending worldwide economic slowdown.</p><p>A deluge of mixed economic data, dominated by a hotter-than-expected inflation report (CPI), cemented an interest rate hike of at least 75 basis points at the conclusion of the Fed&#39;s monetary policy meeting next week.</p><p>&#34;While the market is expecting a big bump in the Fed’s rates next week, there is tremendous uncertainty and concern about future rate increases,&#34; Carter added. &#34;The Fed is doing what it needs to do. And after some pain, markets and the economy will heal themselves.&#34;</p><p>Financial markets have priced in a 18% likelihood of a super-sized, 100 basis point increase to the Fed funds target rate on Wednesday, according to CME&#39;s FedWatch tool.   </p><p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 139.4 points, or 0.45%, to 30,822.42, the S&amp;P 500 lost 28.02 points, or 0.72%, to 3,873.33 and the Nasdaq Composite dropped 103.95 points, or 0.9%, to 11,448.40.</p><p>Nine of the 11 major sectors of the S&amp;P 500 ended in negative territory, with energy and industrials suffering the sharpest percentage drops.</p><p>Dow Transports, viewed as a barometer of economic health, plummeted 5.1%.</p><p>That drop was led by FedEx shares tanking by 21.4%, the biggest drop in the S&amp;P 500.</p><p>Peers United Parcel Service and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/XPO\">XPO Logistics</a> slid 4.5% and 4.7%, respectively, while Amazon.com Inc slipped 2.1%.</p><p>The session also marked the monthly options expiry, which occurs on the third Friday of every month. Options-hedging activity has amplified market moves this year, contributing to heightened volatility.</p><p>The CBOE Market Volatility index, often called &#34;the fear index,&#34; touched a two-month high, breezing past a level associated with heightened investor anxiety.</p><p>Declining issues outnumbered advancing ones on the NYSE by a 3.04-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 2.24-to-1 ratio favored decliners.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 posted no new 52-week highs and 56 new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 21 new highs and 387 new lows.</p><p>Volume on U.S. exchanges was 16.92 billion shares, compared with the 10.72 billion average for the full session over the last 20 trading days.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>US STOCKS-Wall St Drops to Two-Month Lows As Recession Fears Mount</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nUS STOCKS-Wall St Drops to Two-Month Lows As Recession Fears Mount\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-09-17 06:59</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>* FedEx profit warning hits peers</p><p>* All three major U.S. indexes post sharp weekly declines</p><p>* Investors eye next week&#39;s Fed meeting</p><p>* Indexes down: Dow 0.45%, S&amp;P 0.72%, Nasdaq 0.90%</p><p>NEW YORK, Sept 16 (Reuters) - U.S. stocks ended in the red on Friday, falling to two-month lows as a warning of impending global slowdown from FedEx hastened investors&#39; flight to safety at the conclusion of a tumultuous week.</p><p>All three major U.S. stock indexes slid to levels not touched since mid-July, with the S&amp;P 500 closing below 3,900, a closely watched support level.</p><p>Staggering past the finish line of a week rattled by inflation concerns, looming interest rate hikes and ominous economic warning signs, the S&amp;P 500 and the Nasdaq suffered their worst weekly percentage plunges since June.</p><p>&#34;It’s been a tough week. It feels Halloween came early&#34; said David Carter, managing director at JPMorgan in New York. &#34;We are facing in this toxic brew of high inflation, high interest rates and low growth, which isn’t good for stock or bond markets.&#34;</p><p>Risk-off sentiment went from simmer to boil in the wake of FedEx Corp&#39;s withdrawal of its earnings forecast late Thursday, citing signs of dampening global demand.</p><p>FedEx&#39;s move followed remarks from the World Bank and the IMF, both of which warned of an impending worldwide economic slowdown.</p><p>A deluge of mixed economic data, dominated by a hotter-than-expected inflation report (CPI), cemented an interest rate hike of at least 75 basis points at the conclusion of the Fed&#39;s monetary policy meeting next week.</p><p>&#34;While the market is expecting a big bump in the Fed’s rates next week, there is tremendous uncertainty and concern about future rate increases,&#34; Carter added. &#34;The Fed is doing what it needs to do. And after some pain, markets and the economy will heal themselves.&#34;</p><p>Financial markets have priced in a 18% likelihood of a super-sized, 100 basis point increase to the Fed funds target rate on Wednesday, according to CME&#39;s FedWatch tool.   </p><p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 139.4 points, or 0.45%, to 30,822.42, the S&amp;P 500 lost 28.02 points, or 0.72%, to 3,873.33 and the Nasdaq Composite dropped 103.95 points, or 0.9%, to 11,448.40.</p><p>Nine of the 11 major sectors of the S&amp;P 500 ended in negative territory, with energy and industrials suffering the sharpest percentage drops.</p><p>Dow Transports, viewed as a barometer of economic health, plummeted 5.1%.</p><p>That drop was led by FedEx shares tanking by 21.4%, the biggest drop in the S&amp;P 500.</p><p>Peers United Parcel Service and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/XPO\">XPO Logistics</a> slid 4.5% and 4.7%, respectively, while Amazon.com Inc slipped 2.1%.</p><p>The session also marked the monthly options expiry, which occurs on the third Friday of every month. Options-hedging activity has amplified market moves this year, contributing to heightened volatility.</p><p>The CBOE Market Volatility index, often called &#34;the fear index,&#34; touched a two-month high, breezing past a level associated with heightened investor anxiety.</p><p>Declining issues outnumbered advancing ones on the NYSE by a 3.04-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 2.24-to-1 ratio favored decliners.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 posted no new 52-week highs and 56 new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 21 new highs and 387 new lows.</p><p>Volume on U.S. exchanges was 16.92 billion shares, compared with the 10.72 billion average for the full session over the last 20 trading days.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"161125":"标普500","513500":"标普500ETF","BK4554":"元宇宙及AR概念","BK4532":"文艺复兴科技持仓",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","OEX":"标普100","DDM":"道指两倍做多ETF","SDS":"两倍做空标普500ETF","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","BK4507":"流媒体概念","BK4533":"AQR资本管理(全球第二大对冲基金)","BK4566":"资本集团","DOG":"道指反向ETF","UPS":"联合包裹","CPI":"IQ Real Return ETF","BK4535":"淡马锡持仓","BK4524":"宅经济概念","BK4581":"高盛持仓","DJX":"1/100道琼斯","UDOW":"道指三倍做多ETF-ProShares","BK4538":"云计算","UPRO":"三倍做多标普500ETF","BK4527":"明星科技股","BK4559":"巴菲特持仓","SH":"标普500反向ETF","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓","BK4131":"航空货运与物流","BK4579":"人工智能","XPO":"XPO Logistics","BK4122":"互联网与直销零售","IVV":"标普500指数ETF","BK4503":"景林资产持仓","BK4551":"寇图资本持仓","SSO":"两倍做多标普500ETF","BK4022":"陆运","BK4561":"索罗斯持仓","SPXU":"三倍做空标普500ETF","OEF":"标普100指数ETF-iShares","FDX":"联邦快递","BK4504":"桥水持仓","BK4548":"巴美列捷福持仓","SPY":"标普500ETF","DXD":"道指两倍做空ETF","AMZN":"亚马逊",".DJI":"道琼斯","SDOW":"道指三倍做空ETF-ProShares",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2268610718","content_text":"* FedEx profit warning hits peers* All three major U.S. indexes post sharp weekly declines* Investors eye next week's Fed meeting* Indexes down: Dow 0.45%, S&P 0.72%, Nasdaq 0.90%NEW YORK, Sept 16 (Reuters) - U.S. stocks ended in the red on Friday, falling to two-month lows as a warning of impending global slowdown from FedEx hastened investors' flight to safety at the conclusion of a tumultuous week.All three major U.S. stock indexes slid to levels not touched since mid-July, with the S&P 500 closing below 3,900, a closely watched support level.Staggering past the finish line of a week rattled by inflation concerns, looming interest rate hikes and ominous economic warning signs, the S&P 500 and the Nasdaq suffered their worst weekly percentage plunges since June.\"It’s been a tough week. It feels Halloween came early\" said David Carter, managing director at JPMorgan in New York. \"We are facing in this toxic brew of high inflation, high interest rates and low growth, which isn’t good for stock or bond markets.\"Risk-off sentiment went from simmer to boil in the wake of FedEx Corp's withdrawal of its earnings forecast late Thursday, citing signs of dampening global demand.FedEx's move followed remarks from the World Bank and the IMF, both of which warned of an impending worldwide economic slowdown.A deluge of mixed economic data, dominated by a hotter-than-expected inflation report (CPI), cemented an interest rate hike of at least 75 basis points at the conclusion of the Fed's monetary policy meeting next week.\"While the market is expecting a big bump in the Fed’s rates next week, there is tremendous uncertainty and concern about future rate increases,\" Carter added. \"The Fed is doing what it needs to do. And after some pain, markets and the economy will heal themselves.\"Financial markets have priced in a 18% likelihood of a super-sized, 100 basis point increase to the Fed funds target rate on Wednesday, according to CME's FedWatch tool.   The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 139.4 points, or 0.45%, to 30,822.42, the S&P 500 lost 28.02 points, or 0.72%, to 3,873.33 and the Nasdaq Composite dropped 103.95 points, or 0.9%, to 11,448.40.Nine of the 11 major sectors of the S&P 500 ended in negative territory, with energy and industrials suffering the sharpest percentage drops.Dow Transports, viewed as a barometer of economic health, plummeted 5.1%.That drop was led by FedEx shares tanking by 21.4%, the biggest drop in the S&P 500.Peers United Parcel Service and XPO Logistics slid 4.5% and 4.7%, respectively, while Amazon.com Inc slipped 2.1%.The session also marked the monthly options expiry, which occurs on the third Friday of every month. Options-hedging activity has amplified market moves this year, contributing to heightened volatility.The CBOE Market Volatility index, often called \"the fear index,\" touched a two-month high, breezing past a level associated with heightened investor anxiety.Declining issues outnumbered advancing ones on the NYSE by a 3.04-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 2.24-to-1 ratio favored decliners.The S&P 500 posted no new 52-week highs and 56 new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 21 new highs and 387 new lows.Volume on U.S. exchanges was 16.92 billion shares, compared with the 10.72 billion average for the full session over the last 20 trading days.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":566,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9998708765,"gmtCreate":1661052735958,"gmtModify":1676536445827,"author":{"id":"4093501445886610","authorId":"4093501445886610","name":"mrzh","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/c26fff9effd22bd1b2fc753bc22da7f9","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4093501445886610","authorIdStr":"4093501445886610"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Lovely","listText":"Lovely","text":"Lovely","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9998708765","repostId":"2260353209","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2260353209","pubTimestamp":1661042935,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2260353209?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-08-21 08:48","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Amazon Is \"the Dark Horse\" in Streaming As Tech Giants \"Have Nothing to Lose\": Analyst","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2260353209","media":"Yahoo Finance","summary":"The streaming wars have intensified with retail giant Walmart (WMT) officially partnering with Param","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>The streaming wars have intensified with retail giant Walmart (WMT) officially partnering with Paramount Global (PARA), while YouTube TV (GOOGL) is reportedly set to launch an online channel store to compete with the likes of Roku (ROKU), Amazon (AMZN), and Apple (AAPL).</p><p>But with so much competition and a plethora of new strategies peppering the landscape, one platform is standing out to analysts: Amazon Prime Video.</p><p>&#34;From a growth perspective, I actually think Amazon can really be the dark horse,&#34; Geetha Ranganathan, Bloomberg Intelligence senior media analyst, told Yahoo Finance.</p><p>She added the service &#34;can do a lot of damage,&#34; citing its exclusive 15-game &#34;Thursday Night Football&#34; package. The 11-year agreement with the NFL will cost the company a reported $1 billion per year.</p><p>The analyst also called out the platform&#39;s highly-anticipated &#34;The Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power&#34; series, which will roll out eight episodes beginning in early September.</p><p>According to Variety, Amazon plans to spend $465 million to produce the <i>first</i> season of the upcoming show. For context, Peter Jackson’s entire &#34;Lord of the Rings&#34; movie trilogy cost $281 million.</p><p>&#34;Money is no object for Amazon,&#34; Ranganathan stated, adding the tech giant is &#34;happy to be a loss leader&#34; in streaming as it focuses on &#34;the long game.&#34;</p><p>As the streamer looks to expand, a new report from The Wall Street Journal notes Amazon is meeting with top Hollywood movie executives to beef up its film division.</p><p>Amazon Studios has reportedly held conversations with Netflix&#39;s film head, Scott Stuber. The company also held discussions with former Paramount Pictures executive Emma Watts.</p><h2><b>&#39;Tech giants have nothing to lose&#39; </b></h2><p>Ranganathan reiterated that both Amazon&#39;s and Apple&#39;s entrance into the streaming wars &#34;has made the competition so much more intense.&#34;</p><p>&#34;The big risk for the established media companies is that they have a model that they have to prove to investors, and ensure that they are getting returns on investments.&#34;</p><p>&#34;That becomes almost burdensome for them,&#34; the analyst explained.</p><p>Conversely, &#34;tech giants have nothing to lose&#34; due to other services &#34;keeping people in their ecosystem.&#34;</p><p>Streaming is &#34;more of an aggregator-slash-ecosystem play for a company like Amazon or Apple,&#34; she continued, emphasizing it as add-on service to increase the stickiness on the respective platform.</p><p>Cowen media analyst Doug Cruetz agreed, noting, &#34;Amazon and Apple have a lot of businesses and a lot of people on their platform — the economics compared to other players are totally different.&#34;</p><p>He added, &#34;If Apple loses money on its streaming product but fills a lot more iPhones, that&#39;s okay.&#34;</p><p>&#34;Same with Amazon. It&#39;s fine losing money on video since streaming is really just a pure cost center to them because they&#39;re not monetizing it directly.&#34;</p><p>Still, Amazon has packed on the hits in recent months with season 3 of &#34;The Boys&#34; and Chris Pratt&#39;s newly released &#34;The Terminal List&#34; surging in popularity.</p><p>According to Nielsen, &#34;The Terminal List&#34; (despite weak critic reviews) racked up an impressive 1.6 billion minutes of streaming during the July 4 to July 10 viewing window, after premiering on July 1.</p><p>The military thriller came in second only behind &#34;Stranger Things,&#39;&#34; which secured 4.8 billion minutes over that same time period.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Amazon Is \"the Dark Horse\" in Streaming As Tech Giants \"Have Nothing to Lose\": Analyst</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAmazon Is \"the Dark Horse\" in Streaming As Tech Giants \"Have Nothing to Lose\": Analyst\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-08-21 08:48 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/amazon-is-the-dark-horse-in-streaming-tech-giants-have-nothing-to-lose-says-analyst-161427281.html><strong>Yahoo Finance</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The streaming wars have intensified with retail giant Walmart (WMT) officially partnering with Paramount Global (PARA), while YouTube TV (GOOGL) is reportedly set to launch an online channel store to ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/amazon-is-the-dark-horse-in-streaming-tech-giants-have-nothing-to-lose-says-analyst-161427281.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AMZN":"亚马逊"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/amazon-is-the-dark-horse-in-streaming-tech-giants-have-nothing-to-lose-says-analyst-161427281.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2260353209","content_text":"The streaming wars have intensified with retail giant Walmart (WMT) officially partnering with Paramount Global (PARA), while YouTube TV (GOOGL) is reportedly set to launch an online channel store to compete with the likes of Roku (ROKU), Amazon (AMZN), and Apple (AAPL).But with so much competition and a plethora of new strategies peppering the landscape, one platform is standing out to analysts: Amazon Prime Video.\"From a growth perspective, I actually think Amazon can really be the dark horse,\" Geetha Ranganathan, Bloomberg Intelligence senior media analyst, told Yahoo Finance.She added the service \"can do a lot of damage,\" citing its exclusive 15-game \"Thursday Night Football\" package. The 11-year agreement with the NFL will cost the company a reported $1 billion per year.The analyst also called out the platform's highly-anticipated \"The Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power\" series, which will roll out eight episodes beginning in early September.According to Variety, Amazon plans to spend $465 million to produce the first season of the upcoming show. For context, Peter Jackson’s entire \"Lord of the Rings\" movie trilogy cost $281 million.\"Money is no object for Amazon,\" Ranganathan stated, adding the tech giant is \"happy to be a loss leader\" in streaming as it focuses on \"the long game.\"As the streamer looks to expand, a new report from The Wall Street Journal notes Amazon is meeting with top Hollywood movie executives to beef up its film division.Amazon Studios has reportedly held conversations with Netflix's film head, Scott Stuber. The company also held discussions with former Paramount Pictures executive Emma Watts.'Tech giants have nothing to lose' Ranganathan reiterated that both Amazon's and Apple's entrance into the streaming wars \"has made the competition so much more intense.\"\"The big risk for the established media companies is that they have a model that they have to prove to investors, and ensure that they are getting returns on investments.\"\"That becomes almost burdensome for them,\" the analyst explained.Conversely, \"tech giants have nothing to lose\" due to other services \"keeping people in their ecosystem.\"Streaming is \"more of an aggregator-slash-ecosystem play for a company like Amazon or Apple,\" she continued, emphasizing it as add-on service to increase the stickiness on the respective platform.Cowen media analyst Doug Cruetz agreed, noting, \"Amazon and Apple have a lot of businesses and a lot of people on their platform — the economics compared to other players are totally different.\"He added, \"If Apple loses money on its streaming product but fills a lot more iPhones, that's okay.\"\"Same with Amazon. It's fine losing money on video since streaming is really just a pure cost center to them because they're not monetizing it directly.\"Still, Amazon has packed on the hits in recent months with season 3 of \"The Boys\" and Chris Pratt's newly released \"The Terminal List\" surging in popularity.According to Nielsen, \"The Terminal List\" (despite weak critic reviews) racked up an impressive 1.6 billion minutes of streaming during the July 4 to July 10 viewing window, after premiering on July 1.The military thriller came in second only behind \"Stranger Things,'\" which secured 4.8 billion minutes over that same time period.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":451,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9935003490,"gmtCreate":1663001030410,"gmtModify":1676537179992,"author":{"id":"4093501445886610","authorId":"4093501445886610","name":"mrzh","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/c26fff9effd22bd1b2fc753bc22da7f9","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4093501445886610","authorIdStr":"4093501445886610"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Okkk","listText":"Okkk","text":"Okkk","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9935003490","repostId":"2266804526","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2266804526","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1662983039,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2266804526?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-09-12 19:43","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Biden Finalized His Plan to Rein in Big Tech. Big Tech Wasn't Invited","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2266804526","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"President Joe Biden's administration issued a checklist of actions needed to reign in Big Tech on Th","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>President Joe Biden&#39;s administration issued a checklist of actions needed to reign in Big Tech on Thursday, after a roundtable &#34;listening session&#34; on issues within the technology industry.</p><p>But administration officials were not &#34;listening&#34; to the companies that are the targets of many of the desired actions -- Google parent Alphabet Inc. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GOOGL\">$(GOOGL)$</a>(GOOGL), Amazon.com Inc. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMZN\">$(AMZN)$</a>, Apple Inc. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">$(AAPL)$</a>and Facebook parent company <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/META\">Meta Platforms</a> Inc. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/META.UK\">$(META.UK)$</a> The only representatives of the tech industry in attendance were the chief executives of Mozilla Corp. and Sonos Inc. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SONO\">$(SONO)$</a></p><p>&#34;The rise of tech platforms has introduced new and difficult challenges, from the tragic acts of violence linked to toxic online cultures, to deteriorating mental health and well-being, to basic rights of Americans and communities worldwide suffering from the rise of tech platforms big and small,&#34; the White House said in a statement after convening 16 experts -- most of them administration employees -- to discuss technology.</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GGLS\">None</a> of the Big Tech companies replied to request for comment on the listening session, but people familiar with the thinking at two of the companies weren&#39;t entirely surprised. They noted increased actions by the administration to hold social-media companies and purveyors of large digital platforms more accountable with the chances of a Senate vote seemingly dwindling by the hour.</p><p>Industry analysts, however, expressed disappointment at an exclusive, private meeting that recommended punitive actions against the industry&#39;s biggest players without offering a seat at the table. The most controversial reform mentioned on the administration&#39;s list called for &#34;the removal of special protections for large tech platforms,&#34; including changing Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. The section generally provides website platforms immunity from third-party content.</p><p>&#34;Section 230 provides critical protections for platforms of all sizes to moderate content and take down harmful posts, and our research confirms these protections are most important for smaller sites,&#34; Chamber of Progress CEO Adam Kovacevich said. The trade group is funded by Amazon, Meta, Google, Apple, Twitter Inc. (TWTR), Uber Technologies Inc. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/UBER\">$(UBER)$</a> and others.</p><p>Six broad goals listed by the White House mirror legislation slowly wending its way through Congress, the latest indication of a growing crackdown by the White House on high tech&#39;s influence while legislation wallows in the Senate and House. The Justice Department is expected to file antitrust lawsuits against Google for its online-ad business and Apple for its dominant App Store in coming weeks, according to reports in The Wall Street Journal, Politico and elsewhere.</p><p>Social media platforms -- in particular, Meta, Twitter, TikTok and YouTube -- have been identified as the scourge of politicians who are playing to popular sentiment for reining in digital-data collectors such as Meta and Amazon. Those two companies are prime targets of the Federal Trade Commission.</p><p>Congressional inaction was reflected earlier this week when a flustered Sen. Amy Klobuchar, a Minnesota Democrat who is author of a bill to tamp down the power of powerful digital platform landlords like Apple and Facebook, claimed an &#34;incredible onslaught of money&#34; has been an obstacle to passing the legislation.</p><p>&#34;What has slowed us down is the incredible onslaught of money, and that&#39;s what happens with monopolies,&#34; Klobuchar, author of the American Innovation and Choice Online Act, said Tuesday at the Code Conference in Los Angeles. &#34;The senators are talking about it, about the ads running in each state.&#34;</p><p>Organizations funded by the technology industry have plowed more than $200 million on political ads and other lobbying efforts since the beginning of 2021, according to ad-tracking service AdImpact and others.</p><p>Klobuchar, who has written a book on antitrust reform and chaired the Senate Judiciary Committee&#39;s hearings on anticompetitive business practices for more than a year, has furiously pushed for a full Senate vote on her landmark bill as time melts with each passing day in the current legislative session. [The White House said Thursday it was encouraged to see bipartisan interest in Congress to adopt antitrust legislation to address the power of major U.S. tech companies.]</p><p>But absent any of the major principal companies in attendance, reporters pressed White House spokeswoman Karine Jean-Pierreon the participation of Mozilla CEO Mitchell Baker and Sonos CEO Patrick Spence to represent the views of the tech industry.</p><p>Sonos and Google are locked in a series of lawsuits against one another over speaker technology since 2020. Sonos called two suits filed last month by Google an &#34;intimidation tactic&#34; intended to &#34;retaliate against Sonos for speaking out against Google&#39;s monopolistic practices&#34; of royalty payments.</p><p>Nonprofit Mozilla, whose Firefox web browser competes with the likes of Google, has repeatedly clashed with Big Tech. On Friday, the company&#39;s chief security officer, Marshall Erwin, urged federal regulators to crack down on internet giants and browser makers that don&#39;t protect users&#39; privacy.</p><p>&#34;Privacy online is a mess, consumers are stuck in this vicious cycle in which their data is collected, often without their understanding, and then used to manipulate them,&#34; Erwin said during an FTC forum on commercial surveillance and data security.</p><p>&#34;The way that we see the roundtable today, it is, again, the largest roundtable that we have seen from this administration to deal with tech,&#34; Jean-Pierresaid. &#34;What you should take out from today, or take away from today, is that, you know, the president&#39;s going to and has long called for fundamental legislative reforms to address real issues. And so we&#39;re going to continue to do that.&#34;</p><p>The elusive reply came a day before Biden met in Ohio with Intel Corp. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/INTC\">$(INTC)$</a> CEO Pat Gelsinger at a groundbreaking ceremony for Intel&#39;s new $20 billion semiconductor manufacturing facility weeks after Congress passed the $280 billion Chips and Science Act in July.</p><p>&#34;The future of the chip industry is going to be made in America,&#34; Biden said at the event, a White House pre-midterms push to tout new funding for manufacturing and infrastructure. &#34;The industrial <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MDWT\">Midwest</a> is back.&#34;</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Biden Finalized His Plan to Rein in Big Tech. Big Tech Wasn't Invited</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBiden Finalized His Plan to Rein in Big Tech. Big Tech Wasn't Invited\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-09-12 19:43</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>President Joe Biden&#39;s administration issued a checklist of actions needed to reign in Big Tech on Thursday, after a roundtable &#34;listening session&#34; on issues within the technology industry.</p><p>But administration officials were not &#34;listening&#34; to the companies that are the targets of many of the desired actions -- Google parent Alphabet Inc. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GOOGL\">$(GOOGL)$</a>(GOOGL), Amazon.com Inc. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMZN\">$(AMZN)$</a>, Apple Inc. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">$(AAPL)$</a>and Facebook parent company <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/META\">Meta Platforms</a> Inc. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/META.UK\">$(META.UK)$</a> The only representatives of the tech industry in attendance were the chief executives of Mozilla Corp. and Sonos Inc. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SONO\">$(SONO)$</a></p><p>&#34;The rise of tech platforms has introduced new and difficult challenges, from the tragic acts of violence linked to toxic online cultures, to deteriorating mental health and well-being, to basic rights of Americans and communities worldwide suffering from the rise of tech platforms big and small,&#34; the White House said in a statement after convening 16 experts -- most of them administration employees -- to discuss technology.</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GGLS\">None</a> of the Big Tech companies replied to request for comment on the listening session, but people familiar with the thinking at two of the companies weren&#39;t entirely surprised. They noted increased actions by the administration to hold social-media companies and purveyors of large digital platforms more accountable with the chances of a Senate vote seemingly dwindling by the hour.</p><p>Industry analysts, however, expressed disappointment at an exclusive, private meeting that recommended punitive actions against the industry&#39;s biggest players without offering a seat at the table. The most controversial reform mentioned on the administration&#39;s list called for &#34;the removal of special protections for large tech platforms,&#34; including changing Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. The section generally provides website platforms immunity from third-party content.</p><p>&#34;Section 230 provides critical protections for platforms of all sizes to moderate content and take down harmful posts, and our research confirms these protections are most important for smaller sites,&#34; Chamber of Progress CEO Adam Kovacevich said. The trade group is funded by Amazon, Meta, Google, Apple, Twitter Inc. (TWTR), Uber Technologies Inc. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/UBER\">$(UBER)$</a> and others.</p><p>Six broad goals listed by the White House mirror legislation slowly wending its way through Congress, the latest indication of a growing crackdown by the White House on high tech&#39;s influence while legislation wallows in the Senate and House. The Justice Department is expected to file antitrust lawsuits against Google for its online-ad business and Apple for its dominant App Store in coming weeks, according to reports in The Wall Street Journal, Politico and elsewhere.</p><p>Social media platforms -- in particular, Meta, Twitter, TikTok and YouTube -- have been identified as the scourge of politicians who are playing to popular sentiment for reining in digital-data collectors such as Meta and Amazon. Those two companies are prime targets of the Federal Trade Commission.</p><p>Congressional inaction was reflected earlier this week when a flustered Sen. Amy Klobuchar, a Minnesota Democrat who is author of a bill to tamp down the power of powerful digital platform landlords like Apple and Facebook, claimed an &#34;incredible onslaught of money&#34; has been an obstacle to passing the legislation.</p><p>&#34;What has slowed us down is the incredible onslaught of money, and that&#39;s what happens with monopolies,&#34; Klobuchar, author of the American Innovation and Choice Online Act, said Tuesday at the Code Conference in Los Angeles. &#34;The senators are talking about it, about the ads running in each state.&#34;</p><p>Organizations funded by the technology industry have plowed more than $200 million on political ads and other lobbying efforts since the beginning of 2021, according to ad-tracking service AdImpact and others.</p><p>Klobuchar, who has written a book on antitrust reform and chaired the Senate Judiciary Committee&#39;s hearings on anticompetitive business practices for more than a year, has furiously pushed for a full Senate vote on her landmark bill as time melts with each passing day in the current legislative session. [The White House said Thursday it was encouraged to see bipartisan interest in Congress to adopt antitrust legislation to address the power of major U.S. tech companies.]</p><p>But absent any of the major principal companies in attendance, reporters pressed White House spokeswoman Karine Jean-Pierreon the participation of Mozilla CEO Mitchell Baker and Sonos CEO Patrick Spence to represent the views of the tech industry.</p><p>Sonos and Google are locked in a series of lawsuits against one another over speaker technology since 2020. Sonos called two suits filed last month by Google an &#34;intimidation tactic&#34; intended to &#34;retaliate against Sonos for speaking out against Google&#39;s monopolistic practices&#34; of royalty payments.</p><p>Nonprofit Mozilla, whose Firefox web browser competes with the likes of Google, has repeatedly clashed with Big Tech. On Friday, the company&#39;s chief security officer, Marshall Erwin, urged federal regulators to crack down on internet giants and browser makers that don&#39;t protect users&#39; privacy.</p><p>&#34;Privacy online is a mess, consumers are stuck in this vicious cycle in which their data is collected, often without their understanding, and then used to manipulate them,&#34; Erwin said during an FTC forum on commercial surveillance and data security.</p><p>&#34;The way that we see the roundtable today, it is, again, the largest roundtable that we have seen from this administration to deal with tech,&#34; Jean-Pierresaid. &#34;What you should take out from today, or take away from today, is that, you know, the president&#39;s going to and has long called for fundamental legislative reforms to address real issues. And so we&#39;re going to continue to do that.&#34;</p><p>The elusive reply came a day before Biden met in Ohio with Intel Corp. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/INTC\">$(INTC)$</a> CEO Pat Gelsinger at a groundbreaking ceremony for Intel&#39;s new $20 billion semiconductor manufacturing facility weeks after Congress passed the $280 billion Chips and Science Act in July.</p><p>&#34;The future of the chip industry is going to be made in America,&#34; Biden said at the event, a White House pre-midterms push to tout new funding for manufacturing and infrastructure. &#34;The industrial <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MDWT\">Midwest</a> is back.&#34;</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BK4529":"IDC概念","AMZN":"亚马逊","BK4539":"次新股","BK4516":"特朗普概念","TERN":"Terns Pharmaceuticals, Inc.","BK4554":"元宇宙及AR概念","BK4515":"5G概念","BK4532":"文艺复兴科技持仓","TWTR":"Twitter","BK4553":"喜马拉雅资本持仓","BK4191":"家用电器","BK4571":"数字音乐概念","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","BK4507":"流媒体概念","BK4139":"生物科技","BK4576":"AR","BK4533":"AQR资本管理(全球第二大对冲基金)","SONO":"搜诺思公司","BK4575":"芯片概念","GOOG":"谷歌","BK4566":"资本集团","BK4536":"外卖概念","BK4525":"远程办公概念","GOOGL":"谷歌A","BK4524":"宅经济概念","BK4535":"淡马锡持仓","BOLT":"Bolt Biotherapeutics, Inc.","BK4559":"巴菲特持仓","BK4527":"明星科技股","BK4538":"云计算","BK4077":"互动媒体与服务","BK4501":"段永平概念","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓","AAPL":"苹果","INTC":"英特尔","BK4141":"半导体产品","BK4503":"景林资产持仓","BK4551":"寇图资本持仓","BK4574":"无人驾驶","BK4122":"互联网与直销零售","UBER":"优步","BK4022":"陆运","BK4573":"虚拟现实","BK4170":"电脑硬件、储存设备及电脑周边","CRCT":"Cricut, Inc.","BK4512":"苹果概念","BK4078":"消费电子产品","QNETCN":"纳斯达克中美互联网老虎指数","BK4548":"巴美列捷福持仓","BK4514":"搜索引擎"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2266804526","content_text":"President Joe Biden's administration issued a checklist of actions needed to reign in Big Tech on Thursday, after a roundtable \"listening session\" on issues within the technology industry.But administration officials were not \"listening\" to the companies that are the targets of many of the desired actions -- Google parent Alphabet Inc. $(GOOGL)$(GOOGL), Amazon.com Inc. $(AMZN)$, Apple Inc. $(AAPL)$and Facebook parent company Meta Platforms Inc. $(META.UK)$ The only representatives of the tech industry in attendance were the chief executives of Mozilla Corp. and Sonos Inc. $(SONO)$\"The rise of tech platforms has introduced new and difficult challenges, from the tragic acts of violence linked to toxic online cultures, to deteriorating mental health and well-being, to basic rights of Americans and communities worldwide suffering from the rise of tech platforms big and small,\" the White House said in a statement after convening 16 experts -- most of them administration employees -- to discuss technology.None of the Big Tech companies replied to request for comment on the listening session, but people familiar with the thinking at two of the companies weren't entirely surprised. They noted increased actions by the administration to hold social-media companies and purveyors of large digital platforms more accountable with the chances of a Senate vote seemingly dwindling by the hour.Industry analysts, however, expressed disappointment at an exclusive, private meeting that recommended punitive actions against the industry's biggest players without offering a seat at the table. The most controversial reform mentioned on the administration's list called for \"the removal of special protections for large tech platforms,\" including changing Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. The section generally provides website platforms immunity from third-party content.\"Section 230 provides critical protections for platforms of all sizes to moderate content and take down harmful posts, and our research confirms these protections are most important for smaller sites,\" Chamber of Progress CEO Adam Kovacevich said. The trade group is funded by Amazon, Meta, Google, Apple, Twitter Inc. (TWTR), Uber Technologies Inc. $(UBER)$ and others.Six broad goals listed by the White House mirror legislation slowly wending its way through Congress, the latest indication of a growing crackdown by the White House on high tech's influence while legislation wallows in the Senate and House. The Justice Department is expected to file antitrust lawsuits against Google for its online-ad business and Apple for its dominant App Store in coming weeks, according to reports in The Wall Street Journal, Politico and elsewhere.Social media platforms -- in particular, Meta, Twitter, TikTok and YouTube -- have been identified as the scourge of politicians who are playing to popular sentiment for reining in digital-data collectors such as Meta and Amazon. Those two companies are prime targets of the Federal Trade Commission.Congressional inaction was reflected earlier this week when a flustered Sen. Amy Klobuchar, a Minnesota Democrat who is author of a bill to tamp down the power of powerful digital platform landlords like Apple and Facebook, claimed an \"incredible onslaught of money\" has been an obstacle to passing the legislation.\"What has slowed us down is the incredible onslaught of money, and that's what happens with monopolies,\" Klobuchar, author of the American Innovation and Choice Online Act, said Tuesday at the Code Conference in Los Angeles. \"The senators are talking about it, about the ads running in each state.\"Organizations funded by the technology industry have plowed more than $200 million on political ads and other lobbying efforts since the beginning of 2021, according to ad-tracking service AdImpact and others.Klobuchar, who has written a book on antitrust reform and chaired the Senate Judiciary Committee's hearings on anticompetitive business practices for more than a year, has furiously pushed for a full Senate vote on her landmark bill as time melts with each passing day in the current legislative session. [The White House said Thursday it was encouraged to see bipartisan interest in Congress to adopt antitrust legislation to address the power of major U.S. tech companies.]But absent any of the major principal companies in attendance, reporters pressed White House spokeswoman Karine Jean-Pierreon the participation of Mozilla CEO Mitchell Baker and Sonos CEO Patrick Spence to represent the views of the tech industry.Sonos and Google are locked in a series of lawsuits against one another over speaker technology since 2020. Sonos called two suits filed last month by Google an \"intimidation tactic\" intended to \"retaliate against Sonos for speaking out against Google's monopolistic practices\" of royalty payments.Nonprofit Mozilla, whose Firefox web browser competes with the likes of Google, has repeatedly clashed with Big Tech. On Friday, the company's chief security officer, Marshall Erwin, urged federal regulators to crack down on internet giants and browser makers that don't protect users' privacy.\"Privacy online is a mess, consumers are stuck in this vicious cycle in which their data is collected, often without their understanding, and then used to manipulate them,\" Erwin said during an FTC forum on commercial surveillance and data security.\"The way that we see the roundtable today, it is, again, the largest roundtable that we have seen from this administration to deal with tech,\" Jean-Pierresaid. \"What you should take out from today, or take away from today, is that, you know, the president's going to and has long called for fundamental legislative reforms to address real issues. And so we're going to continue to do that.\"The elusive reply came a day before Biden met in Ohio with Intel Corp. $(INTC)$ CEO Pat Gelsinger at a groundbreaking ceremony for Intel's new $20 billion semiconductor manufacturing facility weeks after Congress passed the $280 billion Chips and Science Act in July.\"The future of the chip industry is going to be made in America,\" Biden said at the event, a White House pre-midterms push to tout new funding for manufacturing and infrastructure. \"The industrial Midwest is back.\"","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":260,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9907218323,"gmtCreate":1660195316864,"gmtModify":1703478998138,"author":{"id":"4093501445886610","authorId":"4093501445886610","name":"mrzh","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/c26fff9effd22bd1b2fc753bc22da7f9","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4093501445886610","authorIdStr":"4093501445886610"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Nice","listText":"Nice","text":"Nice","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9907218323","repostId":"2258291275","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2258291275","pubTimestamp":1660180913,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2258291275?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-08-11 09:21","market":"us","language":"en","title":"3 Reasons to Buy Apple Stock Now","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2258291275","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"The tech company hasn't said its last word just yet.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Is there more fuel left in <b>Apple</b>&#39;s growth engine? Because the company has already delivered market-beating returns for years and is near the top of the exclusive group of trillion-dollar companies, some investors are wondering if it&#39;s time to cash in. Others still see signs that Apple isn&#39;t done growing just yet.</p><p>The Silicon Valley giant produced more evidence of its still-solid prospects when it released its latest quarterly update late last month. In it were clues that there are at least three reasons to think Apple isn&#39;t done growing yet and there is still time to get in on outsized returns. Let&#39;s take a look at those reasons.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4d707ca46aab73e16e1d024655ca86c8\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"449\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>AAPL data by YCharts</span></p><h2>1. Despite economic headwinds, Apple is managing to do well</h2><p>Fears of a coming (or already present) recession are not unfounded, and inflation is eroding wage gains and savings. In a macroeconomic environment such as this, consumers tend to hold off spending on things they may want but don&#39;t need. That could easily describe many of Apple&#39;s products. A new smartphone is nice, as is a sleek pair of Bluetooth headphones. In reality, no one <i>needs</i> brand new versions of those things that often sell for well-above-average prices.</p><p>This would suggest Apple is going to have a rough go of it. And while these challenging headwinds have certainly impacted its earnings, the tech giant is managing surprisingly well. In its latest quarterly update (the third quarter of its fiscal year 2022, ending on June 25), Apple&#39;s net sales were up by about 2% year over year to $83 billion.</p><p>This modest top-line growth amid the issues Apple is battling is commendable. Apple&#39;s earnings per share did decrease to $1.20, down from the $1.30 reported during the year-ago period. Rising costs and expenses, partly due to inflation, may have played a role here. Still, overall, Apple&#39;s results were pretty solid. The company owed much of this success to its signature device, the iPhone.</p><h2>2. Long live the iPhone</h2><p>Apple&#39;s iPhone has been its major source of revenue for over a decade now. It arguably no longer generates the buzz it once did; the tech industry used to stop everything and listen every time Apple would announce a new version of its prized device. But demand for the iPhone remains strong. During Apple&#39;s third quarter, revenue from this segment rose 2.8% to $40.7 billion.</p><p>According to CEO Tim Cook, &#34;Looking at the data on iPhone for the June quarter, there&#39;s not obvious evidence in there that there&#39;s a macroeconomic headwind. I&#39;m not saying that there&#39;s not one. I&#39;m saying that the data doesn&#39;t show it where we can clearly see that in the Wearables, Home and Accessories area.&#34;</p><p>Selling more iPhones isn&#39;t just a matter of generating revenue for Apple. It also helps the company grow its installed base, provided a customer not previously part of Apple&#39;s network purchases a new device. That seems to be at least part of the story, as Apple reported that its installed base reached all-time highs across all its products during its latest quarter.</p><p>The long-run implications of these developments are significant. The more people are plugged into Apple&#39;s services network, the more it can monetize these users, and the more it can grow its services revenue. During Apple&#39;s third quarter, the tech giant&#39;s services segment grew faster than the rest of its business, recording total sales of $19.6 billion, 12.1% higher than the year-ago period.</p><h2>3. Margins are making a difference for Apple</h2><p>A key advantage of Apple&#39;s services segment is its higher margins. Although the services segment is still far behind in sales, Apple has made a concerted effort over the years to improve its margins, and this unit has helped these initiatives. During its third quarter, Apple&#39;s products business recorded a gross margin of 34.5%, down 1.5 percentage points compared to the year-ago period.</p><p>However, the company&#39;s services segment saw its margins improve from 69.8% to 71.5%. That helped Apple&#39;s total gross margin remain flat year over year at 43.3%. Investors should look for Apple&#39;s margins to continue improving thanks to its services unit that is growing in importance.</p><h2>Buy Apple and forget</h2><p>Like the rest of the world, Apple is dealing with serious issues at the moment. But the company is not breaking under the weight of its (likely temporary) challenges -- not by a long shot. The customer loyalty it has built over the years is helping it grow sales, especially those of the iPhone. Apple boasts a valuable brand name that is second to none, be it in the technology sector or elsewhere.</p><p>Apple&#39;s services business is positively impacting the company&#39;s margins in a dynamic that will continue for many years. Overall, Apple still looks like an excellent long-term bet for patient investors. No wonder it is one of Warren Buffett&#39;s favorite stocks.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>3 Reasons to Buy Apple Stock Now</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n3 Reasons to Buy Apple Stock Now\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-08-11 09:21 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/08/10/3-reasons-to-buy-apple-stock-now/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Is there more fuel left in Apple's growth engine? Because the company has already delivered market-beating returns for years and is near the top of the exclusive group of trillion-dollar companies, ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/08/10/3-reasons-to-buy-apple-stock-now/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/08/10/3-reasons-to-buy-apple-stock-now/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2258291275","content_text":"Is there more fuel left in Apple's growth engine? Because the company has already delivered market-beating returns for years and is near the top of the exclusive group of trillion-dollar companies, some investors are wondering if it's time to cash in. Others still see signs that Apple isn't done growing just yet.The Silicon Valley giant produced more evidence of its still-solid prospects when it released its latest quarterly update late last month. In it were clues that there are at least three reasons to think Apple isn't done growing yet and there is still time to get in on outsized returns. Let's take a look at those reasons.AAPL data by YCharts1. Despite economic headwinds, Apple is managing to do wellFears of a coming (or already present) recession are not unfounded, and inflation is eroding wage gains and savings. In a macroeconomic environment such as this, consumers tend to hold off spending on things they may want but don't need. That could easily describe many of Apple's products. A new smartphone is nice, as is a sleek pair of Bluetooth headphones. In reality, no one needs brand new versions of those things that often sell for well-above-average prices.This would suggest Apple is going to have a rough go of it. And while these challenging headwinds have certainly impacted its earnings, the tech giant is managing surprisingly well. In its latest quarterly update (the third quarter of its fiscal year 2022, ending on June 25), Apple's net sales were up by about 2% year over year to $83 billion.This modest top-line growth amid the issues Apple is battling is commendable. Apple's earnings per share did decrease to $1.20, down from the $1.30 reported during the year-ago period. Rising costs and expenses, partly due to inflation, may have played a role here. Still, overall, Apple's results were pretty solid. The company owed much of this success to its signature device, the iPhone.2. Long live the iPhoneApple's iPhone has been its major source of revenue for over a decade now. It arguably no longer generates the buzz it once did; the tech industry used to stop everything and listen every time Apple would announce a new version of its prized device. But demand for the iPhone remains strong. During Apple's third quarter, revenue from this segment rose 2.8% to $40.7 billion.According to CEO Tim Cook, \"Looking at the data on iPhone for the June quarter, there's not obvious evidence in there that there's a macroeconomic headwind. I'm not saying that there's not one. I'm saying that the data doesn't show it where we can clearly see that in the Wearables, Home and Accessories area.\"Selling more iPhones isn't just a matter of generating revenue for Apple. It also helps the company grow its installed base, provided a customer not previously part of Apple's network purchases a new device. That seems to be at least part of the story, as Apple reported that its installed base reached all-time highs across all its products during its latest quarter.The long-run implications of these developments are significant. The more people are plugged into Apple's services network, the more it can monetize these users, and the more it can grow its services revenue. During Apple's third quarter, the tech giant's services segment grew faster than the rest of its business, recording total sales of $19.6 billion, 12.1% higher than the year-ago period.3. Margins are making a difference for AppleA key advantage of Apple's services segment is its higher margins. Although the services segment is still far behind in sales, Apple has made a concerted effort over the years to improve its margins, and this unit has helped these initiatives. During its third quarter, Apple's products business recorded a gross margin of 34.5%, down 1.5 percentage points compared to the year-ago period.However, the company's services segment saw its margins improve from 69.8% to 71.5%. That helped Apple's total gross margin remain flat year over year at 43.3%. Investors should look for Apple's margins to continue improving thanks to its services unit that is growing in importance.Buy Apple and forgetLike the rest of the world, Apple is dealing with serious issues at the moment. But the company is not breaking under the weight of its (likely temporary) challenges -- not by a long shot. The customer loyalty it has built over the years is helping it grow sales, especially those of the iPhone. Apple boasts a valuable brand name that is second to none, be it in the technology sector or elsewhere.Apple's services business is positively impacting the company's margins in a dynamic that will continue for many years. Overall, Apple still looks like an excellent long-term bet for patient investors. No wonder it is one of Warren Buffett's favorite stocks.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":261,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9907219707,"gmtCreate":1660195050911,"gmtModify":1703478994255,"author":{"id":"4093501445886610","authorId":"4093501445886610","name":"mrzh","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/c26fff9effd22bd1b2fc753bc22da7f9","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4093501445886610","authorIdStr":"4093501445886610"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9907219707","repostId":"2258224852","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2258224852","pubTimestamp":1660190080,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2258224852?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-08-11 11:54","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why Wednesday’s Jump in Tesla Shares Surprised Investors","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2258224852","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Musk may be selling shares, but investors aren't reading too much into it.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>KEY POINTS</b></p><ul><li>The Tesla CEO explained that he sold shares for what seems like a prudent reason.</li><li>Tesla has upgraded its critical Shanghai plant to be able to produce more than 1 million vehicles per year.</li></ul><p><b>What happened</b></p><p>Many investors would have expected <b>Tesla</b> shares to be sinking on Wednesday. But the opposite is happening. After an early jump of 5%, Tesla stock was still 3.9% higher as of closing.</p><p><b>So what</b></p><p>That move was a bit surprising after it was revealed yesterday that CEO Elon Musk sold almost $7 billion worth of his Tesla shares between Aug. 5 and Aug. 9. Musk&#39;s sales came at prices from about $838.5 to $912 per share.</p><p><b>Now what</b></p><p>While the share sales themselves in no way affect the shareholder value in Tesla, Musk is a widely followed CEO, and his actions -- and words -- have moved the stock in the past. Musk later addressed his followers on <b>Twitter</b> to say the sales were in preparation for the potential purchase of the social media company. He is in a lawsuit with the company trying to back out of the agreement he previously made for the acquisition.</p><p>But his sale of Tesla stock actually seems prudent in that context. If Musk loses the court case and is forced to acquire Twitter, he may need to come up with liquid capital. By selling some Tesla shares now, he avoids the potential for what he called &#34;an emergency sale of Tesla stock.&#34;</p><p>That likely helped boost investor sentiment with Tesla today. There was other news yesterday that was taken as a positive development. Reuters reported that Tesla sold a little more than 28,000 vehicles from its Shanghai plant in July. While that was a huge drop from the record 78,906 vehicles delivered in June, it wasn&#39;t unexpected.</p><p>July production was heavily impacted by shutdowns related to upgrades that are intended to boost capacity at the critical plant by nearly 30%. The factory should now be able to produce more than 1 million vehicles annually. That&#39;s more important news for Tesla investors who want to see it grow production by at least 50% per year for several more years. And it explains why the stock popped today, despite the news of Musk&#39;s share sales.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why Wednesday’s Jump in Tesla Shares Surprised Investors</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy Wednesday’s Jump in Tesla Shares Surprised Investors\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-08-11 11:54 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/08/10/why-todays-jump-in-tesla-shares-surprised-investor/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>KEY POINTSThe Tesla CEO explained that he sold shares for what seems like a prudent reason.Tesla has upgraded its critical Shanghai plant to be able to produce more than 1 million vehicles per year....</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/08/10/why-todays-jump-in-tesla-shares-surprised-investor/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/08/10/why-todays-jump-in-tesla-shares-surprised-investor/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2258224852","content_text":"KEY POINTSThe Tesla CEO explained that he sold shares for what seems like a prudent reason.Tesla has upgraded its critical Shanghai plant to be able to produce more than 1 million vehicles per year.What happenedMany investors would have expected Tesla shares to be sinking on Wednesday. But the opposite is happening. After an early jump of 5%, Tesla stock was still 3.9% higher as of closing.So whatThat move was a bit surprising after it was revealed yesterday that CEO Elon Musk sold almost $7 billion worth of his Tesla shares between Aug. 5 and Aug. 9. Musk's sales came at prices from about $838.5 to $912 per share.Now whatWhile the share sales themselves in no way affect the shareholder value in Tesla, Musk is a widely followed CEO, and his actions -- and words -- have moved the stock in the past. Musk later addressed his followers on Twitter to say the sales were in preparation for the potential purchase of the social media company. He is in a lawsuit with the company trying to back out of the agreement he previously made for the acquisition.But his sale of Tesla stock actually seems prudent in that context. If Musk loses the court case and is forced to acquire Twitter, he may need to come up with liquid capital. By selling some Tesla shares now, he avoids the potential for what he called \"an emergency sale of Tesla stock.\"That likely helped boost investor sentiment with Tesla today. There was other news yesterday that was taken as a positive development. Reuters reported that Tesla sold a little more than 28,000 vehicles from its Shanghai plant in July. While that was a huge drop from the record 78,906 vehicles delivered in June, it wasn't unexpected.July production was heavily impacted by shutdowns related to upgrades that are intended to boost capacity at the critical plant by nearly 30%. The factory should now be able to produce more than 1 million vehicles annually. That's more important news for Tesla investors who want to see it grow production by at least 50% per year for several more years. And it explains why the stock popped today, despite the news of Musk's share sales.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":340,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9935009989,"gmtCreate":1663000453742,"gmtModify":1676537179945,"author":{"id":"4093501445886610","authorId":"4093501445886610","name":"mrzh","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/c26fff9effd22bd1b2fc753bc22da7f9","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4093501445886610","authorIdStr":"4093501445886610"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Kept repeating quantitative, means something","listText":"Kept repeating quantitative, means something","text":"Kept repeating quantitative, means something","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9935009989","repostId":"2266390451","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2266390451","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1662973466,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2266390451?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-09-12 17:04","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Stock-Market Wild Card: What Investors Need to Know as Fed Shrinks Balance Sheet at Faster Pace","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2266390451","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"Quantitative easing is credited with juicing equity returns and boosting other speculative assets by","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Quantitative easing is credited with juicing equity returns and boosting other speculative assets by flooding markets with liquidity as the Federal Reserve snapped up trillions of dollars in bonds after the financial crisis and amid the coronavirus pandemic. Investors and policy makers may be underestimating what happens as the tide goes out.</p><p>&#34;I don&#39;t know if the Fed or anybody else truly understands the impact of QT just yet,&#34; said Aidan Garrib, head of global macro strategy and research at Montreal-based PGM Global, in a phone interview.</p><p>The Fed, in fact, began slowly shrinking its balance sheet -- a process known as quantitative tightening, or QT -- earlier this year. Now it&#39;s accelerating the process, as planned, and it&#39;s making some market watchers nervous.</p><p>A lack of historical experience around the process is raising the uncertainty level. Meanwhile, research that increasingly credits quantitative easing, or QE, with giving asset prices a lift logically points to the potential for QT to do the opposite.</p><p>Since 2010, QE has explained about 50% of the movement in market price-to-earnings multiples, said Savita Subramanian, equity and quant strategist at Bank of America, in an Aug. 15 research note (see chart below).</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c7ba2d5fe717396f178495c88a6ba8f6\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"748\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>&#34;Based on the strong linear relationship between QE and S&amp;P 500 returns from 2010 to 2019, QT through 2023 would translate into a 7 percentage-point drop in the S&amp;P 500 from here,&#34; she wrote.</p><p>In quantitative easing, a central bank creates credit that&#39;s used to buy securities on the open market. Purchases of long-dated bonds are intended to drive down yields, which is seen enhancing appetite for risky assets as investors look elsewhere for higher returns. QE creates new reserves on bank balance sheets. The added cushion gives banks, which must hold reserves in line with regulations, more room to lend or to finance trading activity by hedge funds and other financial market participants, further enhancing market liquidity.</p><p>The way to think about the relationship between QE and equities is to note that as central banks undertake QE, it raises forward earnings expectations. That, in turn, lowers the equity risk premium, which is the extra return investors demand to hold risky equities over safe Treasurys, noted PGM Global&#39;s Garrib. Investors are willing to venture further out on the risk curve, he said, which explains the surge in earnings-free &#34;dream stocks&#34; and other highly speculative assets amid the QE flood as the economy and stock market recovered from the pandemic in 2021.</p><p>However, with the economy recovering and inflation rising the Fed began shrinking its balance sheet in June, and is doubling the pace in September to its maximum rate of $95 billion per month. This will be accomplished by letting $60 billion of Treasurys and $35 billion of mortgage backed securities roll off the balance sheet without reinvestment. At that pace, the balance sheet could shrink by $1 trillion in a year.</p><p>The unwinding of the Fed&#39;s balance sheet that began in 2017 after the economy had long recovered from the 2008-2009 crisis was supposed to be as exciting as &#34;watching paint dry,&#34; then-Federal Reserve Chairwoman Janet Yellen said at the time. It was a ho-hum affair until the fall of 2019, when the Fed had to inject cash into malfunctioning money markets. QE then resumed in 2020 in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p>More economists and analysts have been ringing alarm bells over the possibility of a repeat of the 2019 liquidity crunch.</p><p>&#34;If the past repeats, the shrinking of the central bank&#39;s balance sheet is not likely to be an entirely benign process and will require careful monitoring of the banking sector&#39;s on-and off-balance sheet demandable liabilities,&#34; warned Raghuram Rajan, former governor of the Reserve Bank of India and former chief economist at the International Monetary Fund, and other researchers in a paper presented at the Kansas City Fed&#39;s annual symposium in Jackson Hole, Wyoming, last month.</p><p>Hedge-fund giant Bridgewater Associates in June warned that QT was contributing to a &#34;liquidity hole&#34; in the bond market.</p><p>The slow pace of the wind-down so far and the composition of the balance-sheet reduction have muted the effect of QT so far, but that&#39;s set to change, Garrib said.</p><p>He noted that QT is usually described in the context of the asset side of the Fed&#39;s balance sheet, but it&#39;s the liability side that matters to financial markets. And so far, reductions in Fed liabilities have been concentrated in the Treasury General Account, or TGA, which effectively serves as the government&#39;s checking account.</p><p>That&#39;s actually served to improve market liquidity he explained, as it means the government has been spending money to pay for goods and services. It won&#39;t last.</p><p>The Treasury plans to increase debt issuance in coming months, which will boost the size of the TGA. The Fed will actively redeem T-bills when coupon maturities aren&#39;t sufficient to meet their monthly balance sheet reductions as part of QT, Garrib said.</p><p>The Treasury will be effectively taking money out of economy and putting it into the government&#39;s checking account -- a net drag -- as it issues more debt. That will put more pressure on the private sector to absorb those Treasurys, which means less money to put into other assets, he said.</p><p>The worry for stock-market investors is that high inflation means the Fed won&#39;t have the ability to pivot on a dime as it did during past periods of market stress, said Garrib, who argued that the tightening by the Fed and other major central banks could set up the stock market for a test of the June lows in a drop that could go &#34;significantly below&#34; those levels.</p><p>The main takeaway, he said, is &#34;don&#39;t fight the Fed on the way up and don&#39;t fight the Fed on the way down.&#34;</p><p>Stocks ended higher on Friday, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average , S&amp;P 500  and Nasdaq Composite  snapping a three-week run of weekly losses.</p><p>The highlight of the week ahead will likely come on Tuesday, with the release of the August consumer-price index, which will be parsed for signs inflation is heading back down.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Stock-Market Wild Card: What Investors Need to Know as Fed Shrinks Balance Sheet at Faster Pace</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nStock-Market Wild Card: What Investors Need to Know as Fed Shrinks Balance Sheet at Faster Pace\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-09-12 17:04</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>Quantitative easing is credited with juicing equity returns and boosting other speculative assets by flooding markets with liquidity as the Federal Reserve snapped up trillions of dollars in bonds after the financial crisis and amid the coronavirus pandemic. Investors and policy makers may be underestimating what happens as the tide goes out.</p><p>&#34;I don&#39;t know if the Fed or anybody else truly understands the impact of QT just yet,&#34; said Aidan Garrib, head of global macro strategy and research at Montreal-based PGM Global, in a phone interview.</p><p>The Fed, in fact, began slowly shrinking its balance sheet -- a process known as quantitative tightening, or QT -- earlier this year. Now it&#39;s accelerating the process, as planned, and it&#39;s making some market watchers nervous.</p><p>A lack of historical experience around the process is raising the uncertainty level. Meanwhile, research that increasingly credits quantitative easing, or QE, with giving asset prices a lift logically points to the potential for QT to do the opposite.</p><p>Since 2010, QE has explained about 50% of the movement in market price-to-earnings multiples, said Savita Subramanian, equity and quant strategist at Bank of America, in an Aug. 15 research note (see chart below).</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c7ba2d5fe717396f178495c88a6ba8f6\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"748\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>&#34;Based on the strong linear relationship between QE and S&amp;P 500 returns from 2010 to 2019, QT through 2023 would translate into a 7 percentage-point drop in the S&amp;P 500 from here,&#34; she wrote.</p><p>In quantitative easing, a central bank creates credit that&#39;s used to buy securities on the open market. Purchases of long-dated bonds are intended to drive down yields, which is seen enhancing appetite for risky assets as investors look elsewhere for higher returns. QE creates new reserves on bank balance sheets. The added cushion gives banks, which must hold reserves in line with regulations, more room to lend or to finance trading activity by hedge funds and other financial market participants, further enhancing market liquidity.</p><p>The way to think about the relationship between QE and equities is to note that as central banks undertake QE, it raises forward earnings expectations. That, in turn, lowers the equity risk premium, which is the extra return investors demand to hold risky equities over safe Treasurys, noted PGM Global&#39;s Garrib. Investors are willing to venture further out on the risk curve, he said, which explains the surge in earnings-free &#34;dream stocks&#34; and other highly speculative assets amid the QE flood as the economy and stock market recovered from the pandemic in 2021.</p><p>However, with the economy recovering and inflation rising the Fed began shrinking its balance sheet in June, and is doubling the pace in September to its maximum rate of $95 billion per month. This will be accomplished by letting $60 billion of Treasurys and $35 billion of mortgage backed securities roll off the balance sheet without reinvestment. At that pace, the balance sheet could shrink by $1 trillion in a year.</p><p>The unwinding of the Fed&#39;s balance sheet that began in 2017 after the economy had long recovered from the 2008-2009 crisis was supposed to be as exciting as &#34;watching paint dry,&#34; then-Federal Reserve Chairwoman Janet Yellen said at the time. It was a ho-hum affair until the fall of 2019, when the Fed had to inject cash into malfunctioning money markets. QE then resumed in 2020 in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p>More economists and analysts have been ringing alarm bells over the possibility of a repeat of the 2019 liquidity crunch.</p><p>&#34;If the past repeats, the shrinking of the central bank&#39;s balance sheet is not likely to be an entirely benign process and will require careful monitoring of the banking sector&#39;s on-and off-balance sheet demandable liabilities,&#34; warned Raghuram Rajan, former governor of the Reserve Bank of India and former chief economist at the International Monetary Fund, and other researchers in a paper presented at the Kansas City Fed&#39;s annual symposium in Jackson Hole, Wyoming, last month.</p><p>Hedge-fund giant Bridgewater Associates in June warned that QT was contributing to a &#34;liquidity hole&#34; in the bond market.</p><p>The slow pace of the wind-down so far and the composition of the balance-sheet reduction have muted the effect of QT so far, but that&#39;s set to change, Garrib said.</p><p>He noted that QT is usually described in the context of the asset side of the Fed&#39;s balance sheet, but it&#39;s the liability side that matters to financial markets. And so far, reductions in Fed liabilities have been concentrated in the Treasury General Account, or TGA, which effectively serves as the government&#39;s checking account.</p><p>That&#39;s actually served to improve market liquidity he explained, as it means the government has been spending money to pay for goods and services. It won&#39;t last.</p><p>The Treasury plans to increase debt issuance in coming months, which will boost the size of the TGA. The Fed will actively redeem T-bills when coupon maturities aren&#39;t sufficient to meet their monthly balance sheet reductions as part of QT, Garrib said.</p><p>The Treasury will be effectively taking money out of economy and putting it into the government&#39;s checking account -- a net drag -- as it issues more debt. That will put more pressure on the private sector to absorb those Treasurys, which means less money to put into other assets, he said.</p><p>The worry for stock-market investors is that high inflation means the Fed won&#39;t have the ability to pivot on a dime as it did during past periods of market stress, said Garrib, who argued that the tightening by the Fed and other major central banks could set up the stock market for a test of the June lows in a drop that could go &#34;significantly below&#34; those levels.</p><p>The main takeaway, he said, is &#34;don&#39;t fight the Fed on the way up and don&#39;t fight the Fed on the way down.&#34;</p><p>Stocks ended higher on Friday, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average , S&amp;P 500  and Nasdaq Composite  snapping a three-week run of weekly losses.</p><p>The highlight of the week ahead will likely come on Tuesday, with the release of the August consumer-price index, which will be parsed for signs inflation is heading back down.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2266390451","content_text":"Quantitative easing is credited with juicing equity returns and boosting other speculative assets by flooding markets with liquidity as the Federal Reserve snapped up trillions of dollars in bonds after the financial crisis and amid the coronavirus pandemic. Investors and policy makers may be underestimating what happens as the tide goes out.\"I don't know if the Fed or anybody else truly understands the impact of QT just yet,\" said Aidan Garrib, head of global macro strategy and research at Montreal-based PGM Global, in a phone interview.The Fed, in fact, began slowly shrinking its balance sheet -- a process known as quantitative tightening, or QT -- earlier this year. Now it's accelerating the process, as planned, and it's making some market watchers nervous.A lack of historical experience around the process is raising the uncertainty level. Meanwhile, research that increasingly credits quantitative easing, or QE, with giving asset prices a lift logically points to the potential for QT to do the opposite.Since 2010, QE has explained about 50% of the movement in market price-to-earnings multiples, said Savita Subramanian, equity and quant strategist at Bank of America, in an Aug. 15 research note (see chart below).\"Based on the strong linear relationship between QE and S&P 500 returns from 2010 to 2019, QT through 2023 would translate into a 7 percentage-point drop in the S&P 500 from here,\" she wrote.In quantitative easing, a central bank creates credit that's used to buy securities on the open market. Purchases of long-dated bonds are intended to drive down yields, which is seen enhancing appetite for risky assets as investors look elsewhere for higher returns. QE creates new reserves on bank balance sheets. The added cushion gives banks, which must hold reserves in line with regulations, more room to lend or to finance trading activity by hedge funds and other financial market participants, further enhancing market liquidity.The way to think about the relationship between QE and equities is to note that as central banks undertake QE, it raises forward earnings expectations. That, in turn, lowers the equity risk premium, which is the extra return investors demand to hold risky equities over safe Treasurys, noted PGM Global's Garrib. Investors are willing to venture further out on the risk curve, he said, which explains the surge in earnings-free \"dream stocks\" and other highly speculative assets amid the QE flood as the economy and stock market recovered from the pandemic in 2021.However, with the economy recovering and inflation rising the Fed began shrinking its balance sheet in June, and is doubling the pace in September to its maximum rate of $95 billion per month. This will be accomplished by letting $60 billion of Treasurys and $35 billion of mortgage backed securities roll off the balance sheet without reinvestment. At that pace, the balance sheet could shrink by $1 trillion in a year.The unwinding of the Fed's balance sheet that began in 2017 after the economy had long recovered from the 2008-2009 crisis was supposed to be as exciting as \"watching paint dry,\" then-Federal Reserve Chairwoman Janet Yellen said at the time. It was a ho-hum affair until the fall of 2019, when the Fed had to inject cash into malfunctioning money markets. QE then resumed in 2020 in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.More economists and analysts have been ringing alarm bells over the possibility of a repeat of the 2019 liquidity crunch.\"If the past repeats, the shrinking of the central bank's balance sheet is not likely to be an entirely benign process and will require careful monitoring of the banking sector's on-and off-balance sheet demandable liabilities,\" warned Raghuram Rajan, former governor of the Reserve Bank of India and former chief economist at the International Monetary Fund, and other researchers in a paper presented at the Kansas City Fed's annual symposium in Jackson Hole, Wyoming, last month.Hedge-fund giant Bridgewater Associates in June warned that QT was contributing to a \"liquidity hole\" in the bond market.The slow pace of the wind-down so far and the composition of the balance-sheet reduction have muted the effect of QT so far, but that's set to change, Garrib said.He noted that QT is usually described in the context of the asset side of the Fed's balance sheet, but it's the liability side that matters to financial markets. And so far, reductions in Fed liabilities have been concentrated in the Treasury General Account, or TGA, which effectively serves as the government's checking account.That's actually served to improve market liquidity he explained, as it means the government has been spending money to pay for goods and services. It won't last.The Treasury plans to increase debt issuance in coming months, which will boost the size of the TGA. The Fed will actively redeem T-bills when coupon maturities aren't sufficient to meet their monthly balance sheet reductions as part of QT, Garrib said.The Treasury will be effectively taking money out of economy and putting it into the government's checking account -- a net drag -- as it issues more debt. That will put more pressure on the private sector to absorb those Treasurys, which means less money to put into other assets, he said.The worry for stock-market investors is that high inflation means the Fed won't have the ability to pivot on a dime as it did during past periods of market stress, said Garrib, who argued that the tightening by the Fed and other major central banks could set up the stock market for a test of the June lows in a drop that could go \"significantly below\" those levels.The main takeaway, he said, is \"don't fight the Fed on the way up and don't fight the Fed on the way down.\"Stocks ended higher on Friday, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average , S&P 500  and Nasdaq Composite  snapping a three-week run of weekly losses.The highlight of the week ahead will likely come on Tuesday, with the release of the August consumer-price index, which will be parsed for signs inflation is heading back down.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":214,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}