MHh
07-22
Replying to @Tiger_SG:Thank you[Heart]//@Tiger_SG:coins have been sent~//@MHh:I believe CICT and Keppel dc reit would still have room to grow in the second half of 2025. CapitaLand holds most of the malls that Singaporeans are familiar with and with limited entertainment and nature in Singapore, it has become the favourite pastime for Singaporeans. I believe Keppel dc reit will be able to continue to ride the AI and tech wave, with increased demand yet limited supply in land scarce singapore.


With the fed expected to cut rates, SREITs would have room to rise so im definitely on the side of retail investors.


Compared to US and China/HK equities, SREITs do lack growth potential but that is not the main aim. The aim of SREITs is their great dividend, often at least 4%. This is decent and my aim is to continue adding to them so that I have a decent dividend to rely on for retirement. I allocate about 10% to SREITs as I am still young and would still like to chase some good returns.
@SPOT_ON @LuckyPiggie @Fenger1188 @HelenJanet @Universe宇宙 @Wayneqq come join
S-REITs 52-Week Highs! Dividend Kings or Value Traps?
In the first half of 2025, retail investors were net buyers of S-REITs, with total net inflows of approximately SGD 400 million as of June 26. In contrast, institutional investors were net sellers, with more than SGD 500 million in net outflows. Which of these high-performing REITs do you believe still have room to grow in the second half of 2025? With retail investors buying and institutions selling, whose side are you on and why? Compared to equities, do S-REITs lack growth potential? What percentage of your portfolio would you allocate to REITs?
Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Comments

We need your insight to fill this gap
Leave a comment