Fed Chair Fireworks: Hassett's Dovish Dagger Unlocks 2026 Cuts or Trump's Tariff Tornado Slams the Brakes? πŸš€πŸ’₯πŸ“‰

xc__
12-01

Trump's dropping bombshells like holiday fireworks – teasing his Fed Chair pick on Sunday with a "soon" announcement that could flip the script on 2026's rate path, just as QT bows out today, flooding markets with $1 trillion in fresh liquidity and yanking December cut odds to a sizzling 87%. Prediction markets are in a frenzy: Kevin Hassett's odds skyrocketed to 55% on Kalshi after his "happy to serve" nod, edging out Christopher Waller's 22% and Kevin Warsh's 12% in a race that's got Wall Street sweating over dovish dreams versus hawkish hurdles. With Powell's term ticking down to May 2026, this swap isn't just theater – it's a potential powder keg for 100bps+ cuts or a tariff-fueled stall that keeps yields glued at 4%. As S&P futures nudge 0.1% green amid easing whispers, we're gut-checking if a new boss blasts open the easing floodgates, who deserves the gavel, and if loyalty trumps independence in Trump's Fed 2.0. Buckle up – this chair shuffle could crown cut kings or crash the party. 😀πŸͺ‘

QT's Quiet Exit: Liquidity Lifeline or Inflation Igniter for 2026 Easing? πŸ’Έβš οΈ

Today's QT curtain call – halting the $2.2 trillion balance sheet shrink since 2022 – is pure nitro for rate bets, easing repo strains and supercharging credit flows just as December's 25bps trim odds hit 87% post-Waller's dovish dive. Morgan Stanley's crystal ball sees three more cuts in 2026, dropping the fed funds to 2.9% by year-end amid 2.1% inflation melt, but the wildcard? Trump's chair pick could turbo that to 100bps+ if a dove like Hassett takes the throne, or slam brakes if hawks circle. Historical hook: Post-QT pauses like 2019 sparked 28% S&P surges on cut waves; 2026's fiscal fireworks (tax slashes, spend sprees) could amplify, but tariff tsunamis risk 0.5-1% price pops, forcing a hawkish swerve per IMF math. Liquidity's unlocked, but the new chair's grip on the wheel decides if it's a glide to glory or a grind to gridlock. πŸ“ˆπŸ”’

Hassett's Hawk-Dove Tango: 55% Odds Signal Cut Carnival or Tariff Tightrope? πŸ•ΊπŸ’£

Hassett's the market's mad crush at 55% odds – Trump's NEC whisperer who's pushed "proactive" trims to juice growth, eyeing 100bps+ slashes in 2026 to counter tariff drags and keep GDP humming at 2.5%. His Tax Cuts playbook screams alignment: Lower rates offset 0.5% GDP hits from trade walls, supercharging AI capex to $3T without inflation Armageddon. Waller (22%)? The continuity king – his recent dissents for cuts signal steady 75bps easing, data-driven without drama, defending independence like Powell's playbook. Warsh (12%)? The hawk hybrid – shrink the balance sheet first, then trim, tolerating brief spikes for long-term stability, but his crisis cred could pause if tariffs ignite. Polymarket's cooler at 33% for Hassett, but all three lean dovish vs Powell's caution – a chair swap cracks the door wider for 2026 cuts, especially if Trump loyalty loosens the Fed's reins. Prediction markets scream 80% for at least two trims, but hot PCE Friday (est 2.3% core) could yank to 60%. Who's the wild card? Hassett's Trump tilt – bullish for cuts, bearish for dollar at 94 forecasts. 🏦🎲

Chair Clash: Independence Ironclad or Trump Tango Time? πŸ‘‘πŸ•΅οΈ

Powell's masterclass in stonewalling – sticking to data despite Trump's tweet tantrums – sets the bar, but a new chair under MAGA 2.0? Expect more sway: Hassett's White House roots scream alignment on growth-first cuts, potentially echoing Trump's "too high" rants with 125bps slashes to offset deficits at 7% GDP. Waller's insider status? He'd likely hold the line like Powell, easing 75bps on labor cools (ADP est 150K Wednesday) without kowtowing. Warsh's hawkish history? A reset artist – balance sheet trim first, cuts second, but his Hoover ties whisper independence amid trade storms. Senate confirmation's the gauntlet: 51-vote GOP edge greenlights Hassett, but Dem pushback on loyalty could drag to February. Bottom line: Cuts accelerate under any, but Trump's gravity pulls harder than Powell's pivot – 2026's fed funds to 2.5% if dove wins, 3.5% if hawk holds. Loyalty's the lure, but data's the decider. βš–οΈπŸ—³οΈ

Four Fed Fate Flippers Shaping 2026's Cut Carnival πŸ”₯🧨

  1. QT Liquidity Lava: $1T Flood Fuels Easing Fire? πŸŒ‹πŸ’¦ Ending QT today removes the liquidity leak, mirroring 2019's 28% rally – sets stage for 100bps+ cuts if Hassett helms, but tariff inflation (0.5% pop) could cap at 50bps per IMF.

  2. Hassett's Cut Crusade: Trump's Ally Accelerates or Independence Implodes? πŸƒβ€β™‚οΈπŸ”₯ 55% odds for the dovish dynamo – his "proactive" trim push eyes 125bps to juice 2.5% GDP, but White House whispers risk Powell-style clashes if tariffs backfire.

  3. Waller's Steady Sail: Continuity Cuts at 75bps or Trump Test? β›΅πŸ“ 22% shot for the data devotee – his recent cut dissents signal measured easing, holding independence amid 2.1% inflation melt, but less aggressive than Hassett's hammer.

  4. Warsh's Hawk Harmony: Balance Sheet First, Trims Second? πŸ¦…βš–οΈ 12% for the crisis vet – shrink assets pre-cuts for stability, tolerating spikes, but his Hoover hawkery pauses if PCE heats, capping 2026 at 50bps.

Fed Chair Odds & Cut Projections: December 1 Snapshot πŸ“…πŸŽ²

Bullish Blitz: Hassett's Helm Unlocks 125bps Cuts – Easing Empire for 2026! πŸ‚πŸŒˆ

  • QT liquidity lift: $1T flood supercharges risk-on, echoing 2019's 28% surge.

  • Hassett harmony: Dovish dynamo aligns with Trump's growth gospel, slashing to 2.5% funds.

  • Waller wildcard: Balanced bets keep 75bps steady, data-driven dazzle.

  • Warsh wisdom: Hawk hold stabilizes, but cuts follow for 2.1% inflation melt.

  • Tariff triumph: Offsets via proactive trims, GDP to 2.5% glow.

Bearish Brawl: Powell Pivot Persists – Independence Ironclad Caps Cuts at 50bps πŸ»πŸ›‘οΈ

  • Tariff tornado: 0.5% inflation spike forces hawk swerve, pausing easing.

  • Loyalty limits: Senate scrutiny stalls Hassett, defaults to Waller's caution.

  • Deficit demons: 7% GDP bloat spooks yields to 4.5%, QT unwind woes.

  • Data drag: Hot PCE/ADP yanks odds to 60%, funds floor at 3.5%.

  • Chair clash: Independence wins – no Trump tango, measured 50bps max.

Strategic Slam: Bet on Hassett Doves – Long Rate Cut Plays, Short Dollar Dips! πŸŽ―πŸ›‘οΈ Cut chasers: Long TLT calls on 87% Dec odds for 2026 yield crush. Chair bets: Polymarket longs on Hassett for 55% payout. Bears: Short bonds if PCE heats. My pick? Waller for steady independence – cuts come, but data dictates, not drama. 2026's 75bps sweet spot.

Powell Power Play: QT's Swan Song Sparks Chair Saga – Dovish Door Cracks Wide for 2026 Cuts! πŸ˜±πŸ€‘

πŸ“’ Like, repost, and follow for daily updates on market trends and stock insights.

πŸ“ Disclaimer: This post is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Always conduct your own research before making investment decisions.

πŸ“Œ@Daily_Discussion @Tiger_comments @TigerStars @TigerEvents @TigerWire @CaptainTiger @MillionaireTiger

QT Ends & New Fed Chair! Bullish or Bearish for 2026 Rate Cuts?
Trump said on Sunday that he has selected his pick for the next Federal Reserve Chair and will announce the decision soon. According to prediction market, Hassett currently has a 64% probability of being nominatedβ€”up sharply from less than 40% on Tuesday. Fed Governor Christopher Waller has a 12% chance, while former Fed Governor Kevin Warsh stands at 11%. Do you think a change in Fed Chair could open the door for rate cuts in 2026? Who do you support as the next Fed Chair? And will the new chair stick to their own views like Powell, or align more closely with Trump’s positions?
Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Comments

We need your insight to fill this gap
Leave a comment