Cyber security next engine of growth

Mkoh
12-20 22:40

In the rapidly evolving digital landscape of 2025, cybersecurity has shifted from a "nice-to-have" IT expense to a non-discretionary "survival cost." With the global cybersecurity market projected to grow from $245 billion in 2024 to over $500 billion by 2030, investors are increasingly looking at the two "Goliaths" of the industry: Palo Alto Networks (PANW) and CrowdStrike (CRWD).  

While both are leaders, they represent two distinct philosophies of security and investment profiles.

The Growth Thesis: Why Cybersecurity Now?

The investment case for cybersecurity rests on three pillars:

The AI "Arms Race": Generative AI has lowered the barrier for hackers to create sophisticated phishing and malware. Conversely, companies must use AI-driven security to defend at machine speed.  

Platformization: Enterprises are tired of managing 50+ different security vendors. They are consolidating their budgets into "all-in-one" platforms.  

Non-Discretionary Spending: Unlike marketing or HR software, security budgets are rarely cut, even in a recession, because the cost of a breach (average $4.9 million in 2024) is far higher than the software cost.  

Palo Alto Networks (PANW): The "Supermarket" of Security

Palo Alto Networks is the larger, more established player. Their strategy is "Platformization"—offering a massive, integrated suite that covers everything from hardware firewalls to cloud security and AI-driven operations.  

Investment Profile: A "Blue Chip" growth stock.

Key Advantage: They own the "Network" (Firewalls) and are successfully moving customers into their cloud and endpoint suites. They recently hit a milestone of 1,400+ platformized customers, with a goal of 3,000 by 2030.  

Financial Health: Better profitability and Free Cash Flow (FCF) margins compared to smaller peers. It trades at a more "reasonable" forward Sales multiple (approx. 12x) compared to CrowdStrike.  

Risk: Growth has slowed to the mid-teens as they transition customers to longer-term platform deals, which can create "choppy" revenue in the short term.  

CrowdStrike (CRWD): The AI-Native Speedster

CrowdStrike is built on the Falcon Platform, a cloud-native architecture that uses a "single agent" to protect everything. They focus on the Endpoint (laptops, servers, mobile devices) and have expanded into identity and data protection.  

Investment Profile: High-octane growth.

Key Advantage: Falcon Flex. Their subscription model is incredibly sticky. In 2025, they reported that nearly 50% of customers use 6 or more modules, and their Net Dollar Retention remains high (above 115%), meaning existing customers spend more every year.

Financial Health: CrowdStrike grows significantly faster than Palo Alto (mid-20% to 30% range) but carries a much higher valuation (forward Sales multiple of 22x+).  

Risk: The "July 2024 Outage" proved that being the single point of protection is a double-edged sword. While they have recovered, the "premium" price tag means any miss in earnings leads to high volatility.

The Verdict: Which one to buy?

For the Conservative Growth Investor: Palo Alto Networks is the choice. Its "platformization" strategy is winning the war for consolidation, and its lower valuation provides a better margin of safety.  

For the Aggressive Growth Investor: CrowdStrike is the winner. It is arguably the most technologically advanced AI security company, and its ability to upsell customers into 8+ modules creates a powerful "flywheel" effect.  

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Comments

We need your insight to fill this gap
Leave a comment