EMPLOYEE FIRED AFTER HR DISCOVERS SHE HAS BEEN WORKING TWO FULL-TIME REMOTE JOBS SIMULTANEOUSLY FOR TWO YEARS

Shernice軒嬣 2000
04-07 07:47

Boston, MA -- A 38-year-old Boston woman is facing termination from two separate employers simultaneously after HR departments at both companies independently discovered she had been working dual full-time remote positions for twenty six consecutive months, attending meetings for both, hitting deadlines for both, and collecting two full salaries while her combined employers believed they each had her undivided professional attention.

They did not. They had exactly half of it. And by all available metrics, half of Rachel Donovan was still outperforming most people's whole.

Rachel, 38, took her first remote position in the spring of 2022. Six weeks later she accepted a second offer from a competing firm in a similar role. Same hours. Overlapping meetings. Identical deliverables. She bought a second laptop, set up two monitors side by side, color coded her calendars, and went to work.

According to HR documentation from both companies the two year operation included:


Forty one instances of overlapping video calls managed through strategic muting and careful camera angles

Two separate performance reviews in the same quarter, both rated exceeds expectations

One promotion accepted at company one the same week company two named her to a leadership committee

A combined annual salary of $218,000 neither employer knew was being split down the middle

Four team happy hours attended back to back on the same Friday evening from the same desk chair


Rachel was discovered when both companies announced in-person return to office mandates on the same Monday. She requested remote exceptions from both simultaneously. Both denied. Both scheduled her return for the same Tuesday. HR at company one noticed her conflicting availability. A single phone call between the two HR departments confirmed the rest.

Rachel told investigators the arrangement was a productivity experiment she stood behind completely and offered her dual performance reviews as supporting documentation.

Both companies declined the documentation. Both terminated her the same afternoon. Rachel updated her LinkedIn that evening. She has since received fourteen recruiter messages.

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Comments

  • Wayneqq
    04-07 09:01
    Wayneqq
    All I can say is the original 2 companies are stupid to terminate her employment considering that she did her job magnificently.. I dunno what was in her employment contract.. but if they are private companies.. I think exceptions can be made...
    • Shernice軒嬣 2000
      It feels like a setup by jealous colleagues especially since rival companies rarely work together.
  • HengHuat
    04-08 06:45
    HengHuat
    her half effort still win the full effort colleagues..wow
Leave a comment
3