$BTC: Elliott Wave Doesn’t Have to Be Complicated

This type of wave counting is INSANE to me. Traders keep overcomplicating Elliott Wave.

The $BTC chart shows a straightforward 5-3-5 ABC correction. My count focuses on three common Elliott Wave tendencies:

Both 4th waves are smaller than their respective 2nd waves.
Wave (B) is the dominant correction within the pattern.
Wave (C) ends near a common Fibonacci target, roughly equal in length to wave (A).

That’s what I look for: the count that follows the most common tendencies, without forcing unnecessary complexity.

The alternative labeling below is exactly the problem. When a count becomes too subjective to explain or repeat, it loses practical value.

EW 2.0 is designed to make the process mechanical:

Identify the 4th waves.
Compare each one with its corresponding 2nd wave.
Confirm that both 4th waves are smaller.

Elliott Wave has earned a reputation for being overly subjective. My goal with EW 2.0 is to make the process easier to understand, explain and repeat.

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Comments

We need your insight to fill this gap

Leave a comment

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"detailType":1,"isChannel":false,"data":{"magic":2,"id":626073529917560,"tweetId":"626073529917560","gmtCreate":1793863303929,"gmtModify":1793863309953,"author":{"id":4160789479824912,"idStr":"4160789479824912","authorId":4160789479824912,"authorIdStr":"4160789479824912","name":"TRIGGER TRADES","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/2249ecc555aef3f3da258e02a1f32c0d","vip":8,"userType":8,"introduction":"Leader In Elliott Wave | Futures Trader","boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[],"wearingBadges":[],"fanSize":1428,"starInvestorFlag":false},"themes":[],"images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/465f191f957822a1e970439ef51f9f29","width":"3618","height":"1774"}],"coverImages":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/465f191f957822a1e970439ef51f9f29","width":"3618","height":"1774"}],"title":"$BTC: Elliott Wave Doesn’t Have to Be Complicated","html":"<html><head></head><body><img alt=\" \" title=\" \" src=\"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/465f191f957822a1e970439ef51f9f29\" tg-width=\"3618\" tg-height=\"1774\"> \nThis type of wave counting is INSANE to me. Traders keep overcomplicating Elliott Wave.\nThe $BTC chart shows a straightforward 5-3-5 ABC correction. My count focuses on three common Elliott Wave tendencies:\n<ol start=\"1\" style=\"\">\n <li>\n Both 4th waves are smaller than their respective 2nd waves.</li>\n <li>\n Wave (B) is the dominant correction within the pattern.</li>\n <li>\n Wave (C) ends near a common Fibonacci target, roughly equal in length to wave (A).</li>\n</ol>\nThat’s what I look for: the count that follows the most common tendencies, without forcing unnecessary complexity.\nThe alternative labeling below is exactly the problem. When a count becomes too subjective to explain or repeat, it loses practical value.\nEW 2.0 is designed to make the process mechanical:\n<ul style=\"\">\n <li>\n Identify the 4th waves.</li>\n <li>\n Compare each one with its corresponding 2nd wave.</li>\n <li>\n Confirm that both 4th waves are smaller.</li>\n</ul>\nElliott Wave has earned a reputation for being overly subjective. My goal with EW 2.0 is to make the process easier to understand, explain and repeat.</body></html>","htmlText":"<html><head></head><body><img alt=\" \" title=\" \" src=\"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/465f191f957822a1e970439ef51f9f29\" tg-width=\"3618\" tg-height=\"1774\"> \nThis type of wave counting is INSANE to me. Traders keep overcomplicating Elliott Wave.\nThe $BTC chart shows a straightforward 5-3-5 ABC correction. My count focuses on three common Elliott Wave tendencies:\n<ol start=\"1\" style=\"\">\n <li>\n Both 4th waves are smaller than their respective 2nd waves.</li>\n <li>\n Wave (B) is the dominant correction within the pattern.</li>\n <li>\n Wave (C) ends near a common Fibonacci target, roughly equal in length to wave (A).</li>\n</ol>\nThat’s what I look for: the count that follows the most common tendencies, without forcing unnecessary complexity.\nThe alternative labeling below is exactly the problem. When a count becomes too subjective to explain or repeat, it loses practical value.\nEW 2.0 is designed to make the process mechanical:\n<ul style=\"\">\n <li>\n Identify the 4th waves.</li>\n <li>\n Compare each one with its corresponding 2nd wave.</li>\n <li>\n Confirm that both 4th waves are smaller.</li>\n</ul>\nElliott Wave has earned a reputation for being overly subjective. My goal with EW 2.0 is to make the process easier to understand, explain and repeat.</body></html>","text":"This type of wave counting is INSANE to me. Traders keep overcomplicating Elliott Wave. The $BTC chart shows a straightforward 5-3-5 ABC correction. My count focuses on three common Elliott Wave tendencies: Both 4th waves are smaller than their respective 2nd waves. Wave (B) is the dominant correction within the pattern. Wave (C) ends near a common Fibonacci target, roughly equal in length to wave (A). That’s what I look for: the count that follows the most common tendencies, without forcing unnecessary complexity. The alternative labeling below is exactly the problem. When a count becomes too subjective to explain or repeat, it loses practical value. EW 2.0 is designed to make the process mechanical: Identify the 4th waves. Compare each one with its corresponding 2nd wave. Confirm that both 4th waves are smaller. Elliott Wave has earned a reputation for being overly subjective. My goal with EW 2.0 is to make the process easier to understand, explain and repeat.","highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":2,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/626073529917560","repostId":0,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":417,"commentLimit":10,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"symbols":[],"verified":2,"subType":0,"readableState":1,"langContent":"EN","currentLanguage":"EN","warmUpFlag":false,"orderFlag":false,"shareable":true,"causeOfNotShareable":"","featuresForAnalytics":[],"commentAndTweetFlag":false,"andRepostAutoSelectedFlag":false,"upFlag":false,"length":818,"optionInvolvedFlag":false,"subscribersOnly":false,"subscribersOnlyAccessible":false,"xxTargetLangEnum":"ORIG"},"commentList":[],"isCommentEnd":true,"isTiger":false,"isWeiXinMini":false,"url":"/m/post/626073529917560"}