$Strategy(MSTR)$ MSTR started this whole thing, and this is the thanks we get.

$Strategy(MSTR)$ Still holding that momentum steady. Buyers keep stepping in on every dip, and it feels more like accumulation than distribution. BTC strength just adds fuel here. The chart looks constructive, so I'm watching for continuation.

$Strategy(MSTR)$ Still holding with strong momentum. Buyers keep stepping in on every dip, so it hasn't really been allowed to cool off. The Bitcoin correlation is working in its favor at the moment. This trend still looks like it has legs.

$Strategy(MSTR)$  It follows BTC.X, which is junk of course, but it looks ready to pop once again. 180-200 is my primary target here. Could take some time, so I loaded $T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF(MSTU)$  instead of naked calls that carry ridiculous premiums and theta burn risk.

$Srx Global Inc(SRXH)$ $Strategy(MSTR)$ It was at $9 and ripped to $500+. We haven't even hit NAV $3+ or filled the gap at $5.40 pre split yet.

$Strategy(MSTR)$ $Solowin Holdings(AXG)$  is building regulated stablecoins for payments, settlement and institutional use. Add +895% YoY revenue growth, $22.2M in AI infrastructure revenue and the new 100+ MW AI/HPC target, and this story is getting bigger fast.

BTC.XJust buy and hold, we're only going up from here. Don't listen to the shorts who want you to sell. We could definitely break 83k going into the weekend. Consolidation is expected, look how far we've got.

$Strategy(MSTR)$ Bears seem to think that just because this ran so far so fast, it has to come down, right? But remember, this hit a high of around $197 in May when BTC.X was trading at 82k. The dilution machine was running hard last week while this jumped. The dilution should be slowing down at this point. Bears should be concerned.

BTC.X$Strive(ASST)$ $Strategy(MSTR)$ $BitMine Immersion Technologies Inc.(BMNR)$ Capital allocation for this bull market: $25,000 in BTC, $325,000 in MSTR, $260,000 in ASST, $170,000 in BMNR. Am I missing anything?

BTC.XLooks like a bit of selling from Saylor to signal to $SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust(SPY)$  that $Strategy(MSTR)$  is ready for the next move. No offense to the crypto crowd, but it feels like we could be in for a rally.

$Strategy(MSTR)$ It's got a long way to go back up. I bought more shares down here and I can wait it out until I make a profit. It seems straightforward enough.

$Strategy(MSTR)$ MSTR essentially functions like a closed-end fund, and most of them use about one-third leverage. The typical approach to buying CEFs is twofold: first, when you believe the underlying assets have bottomed, and second, when the share price trades at a significant discount to the net asset value per share. That's essentially what the figures below indicate. Last week, MSTR hit a 43% discount to its assets at the $81 price level, which is quite extreme. Purchasing at a discount means you're acquiring more assets per share than the current price reflects, offering a higher level of protection. Even if the asset value declines, you own them at a much lower cost. Currently, the discount implies you own the assets at roughly 27% be

$Strategy(MSTR)$  WELFARE CHECK ON SHORTT

$Strategy(MSTR)$  Every time Bitcoin was down for three quarters in a row like it is now, the price has come back strong.

$Strategy(MSTR)$ One day we'll call this company pure genius. That day isn't today, though.

$Strategy(MSTR)$ Congratulations to those who followed along, MSTR's 115 calls are on fire right now.

$Strategy(MSTR)$  Bitcoin is back above $76k, and MSTR is moving with it. I like how that looks.

$Strategy(MSTR)$  Bitcoin rebounding to 75k will be easy

$Strategy(MSTR)$  was heavily oversold and will see a major breakout upwards. BTC is showing good life.

$Strategy(MSTR)$ These articles questioning MNAV are cracking me up. As if the structural risk of buying an unhedged commodity suddenly appeared and people are surprised by the impact when BTC falls. There is amplified risk on both sides. Isn't that the point of the model. Good grief. You would expect intelligent individuals to be smart. Or is there something more manipulative behind the intent of these content authors? Hard for me to believe they are not that intelligent.