WGSsss personal page - To The Moon

WGSsss

WGSsss

No personal profile

122Follow

11Followers

0Topic

0Badge

2021-06-20

It Worth to have a look. Please like and comment

Answering the great inflation question of our time

2021-06-21

Hi all please kindly help me like and comment on this post , thanks in advance . Have a good day.

Nike, FedEx, Johnson & Johnson, Darden, and Other Stocks for Investors to Watch This Week

2021-04-25

good

Sell Signals All but Useless in Unchartable 2021 Stock Market

2021-06-12

Wow

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2021-04-09

good

Cathie Wood Adds These Stocks To The Newly-Created Space Exploration ETF And Others

2021-03-04

cool

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2021-04-29

like and comment pls

Qualcomm revenue pops 52% on strong smartphone demand

2021-03-30

Good

Micron earnings: Semiconductor shortage leads to heightened expectations

2021-04-27

Good

Oil Holds Drop Near $62 With Virus Flare-Up Looming Over Market

2021-04-24

Good

Elon Musk wants SpaceX to reach Mars so humanity is not a ‘single-planet species’

2021-04-12

Good

Exclusive: Gary Vee And Matt Higgins Talk Coinbase IPO, Going Public At Height Of A Trend

2021-04-09

Great ariticle, would you like to share it?

3 FAANG Stock Laggards Look For A Return To Highs

2021-04-26

good

Hong Kong-Singapore Air Travel Bubble to Start on May 26

2021-04-20

good

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2021-04-18

Good

$544 Billion In Options Expire Today: Here's What Will Move

2021-04-16

Good

Here's Why Sunrun, Apple And Amazon Are Moving

2021-03-31

good

Exclusive: China considering new bourse to attract overseas-listed firms

2021-05-05

good

S&P 500 ends day 0.7% lower, Nasdaq sheds nearly 2% for worst day since March

2021-04-28

Good

Reporting Deadline Looms for Scores of Hong Kong-Listed Firms

2021-03-15

Good

'Mank' leads Oscar nominations with 10 nods

Go to Tiger App to see more news

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"userPageInfo":{"id":"3557272953214384","uuid":"3557272953214384","gmtCreate":1594365850357,"gmtModify":1625968265061,"name":"WGSsss","pinyin":"wgssss","introduction":"","introductionEn":"","signature":"","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c859daf551024a3f95b178c72e1b8354","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":11,"headSize":122,"tweetSize":55,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":1,"name":"萌萌虎","nameTw":"萌萌虎","represent":"呱呱坠地","factor":"评论帖子3次或发布1条主帖（非转发）","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":"success","userBadges":[{"badgeId":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493-3","templateUuid":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493","name":" Tiger Idol","description":"Join the tiger community for 1500 days","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8b40ae7da5bf081a1c84df14bf9e6367","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f160eceddd7c284a8e1136557615cfad","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/11792805c468334a9b31c39f95a41c6a","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2024.08.19","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"44212b71d0be4ec88898348dbe882e03-1","templateUuid":"44212b71d0be4ec88898348dbe882e03","name":"Boss Tiger","description":"The transaction amount of the securities account reaches $100,000","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c8dfc27c1ee0e25db1c93e9d0b641101","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f43908c142f8a33c78f5bdf0e2897488","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/82165ff19cb8a786e8919f92acee5213","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.07.14","exceedPercentage":"60.41%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1101},{"badgeId":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be-2","templateUuid":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be","name":"Master Trader","description":"Total number of securities or futures transactions reached 100","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ad22cfbe2d05aa393b18e9226e4b0307","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/36702e6ff3ffe46acafee66cc85273ca","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d52eb88fa385cf5abe2616ed63781765","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.28","exceedPercentage":"80.54%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100},{"badgeId":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789-1","templateUuid":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789","name":"Knowledgeable Investor","description":"Traded more than 10 stocks","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e74cc24115c4fbae6154ec1b1041bf47","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d48265cbfd97c57f9048db29f22227b0","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76c6d6898b073c77e1c537ebe9ac1c57","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1102},{"badgeId":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84-1","templateUuid":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84","name":"Real Trader","description":"Completed a transaction","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":5,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"location":null,"starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"hot","tweets":[{"id":167832369,"gmtCreate":1624257364051,"gmtModify":1703831757227,"author":{"id":"3557272953214384","authorId":"3557272953214384","name":"WGSsss","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c859daf551024a3f95b178c72e1b8354","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3557272953214384","authorIdStr":"3557272953214384"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Great ariticle, would you like to share it?","listText":"Great ariticle, would you like to share it?","text":"Great ariticle, would you like to share it?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/167832369","repostId":"167924304","repostType":1,"repost":{"id":167924304,"gmtCreate":1624243574804,"gmtModify":1703831395495,"author":{"id":"3527667596890271","authorId":"3527667596890271","name":"Buy_Sell","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a5f0ed79a338c758a22e0b4ea13bf9d2","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3527667596890271","authorIdStr":"3527667596890271"},"themes":[],"title":"【6月21日】今天有什麼交易計劃？","htmlText":"聊聊今日份的交易想法，包括對於大盤走勢後續的看法？看漲/看跌哪隻股票、曬曬單等等。  港股市場 6月21日，港股主要指數全線低開，恆指跌1.04%報28501點，國指底0.94%報1546點，恆生科技指數跌1.07%報7955點。 盤面上，鋼鐵股強勢，鞍鋼股份大幅上漲8%；藥品股、電信股、燃氣股多數上漲，此前連續大跌的中國燃氣止跌；光伏股、汽車股、銅、等板塊大跌，體育用品股漲跌不一，<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/01368\">$特步國際(01368)$</a> 跌3%，<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/02331\">$李寧(02331)$</a> 、<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/01361\">$361度(01361)$</a> 小幅高開；大型科技股普跌，<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/09999\">$網易-S(09999)$</a> 跌超3%，<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/03690\">$美團-W(03690)$</a> 、<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/01024\">$快手-W(01024)$</a> 、<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/01810\">$小米集團-W(01810)$</a> 皆跌超1%。 鞍鋼股份漲8%，預計上半年淨利同比增860%。 美股市場 經濟數據方面：中國LPR利率、美國PCE物價指數、美國初請失業金人數、美國Markit製造業PM","listText":"聊聊今日份的交易想法，包括對於大盤走勢後續的看法？看漲/看跌哪隻股票、曬曬單等等。  港股市場 6月21日，港股主要指數全線低開，恆指跌1.04%報28501點，國指底0.94%報1546點，恆生科技指數跌1.07%報7955點。 盤面上，鋼鐵股強勢，鞍鋼股份大幅上漲8%；藥品股、電信股、燃氣股多數上漲，此前連續大跌的中國燃氣止跌；光伏股、汽車股、銅、等板塊大跌，體育用品股漲跌不一，<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/01368\">$特步國際(01368)$</a> 跌3%，<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/02331\">$李寧(02331)$</a> 、<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/01361\">$361度(01361)$</a> 小幅高開；大型科技股普跌，<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/09999\">$網易-S(09999)$</a> 跌超3%，<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/03690\">$美團-W(03690)$</a> 、<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/01024\">$快手-W(01024)$</a> 、<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/01810\">$小米集團-W(01810)$</a> 皆跌超1%。 鞍鋼股份漲8%，預計上半年淨利同比增860%。 美股市場 經濟數據方面：中國LPR利率、美國PCE物價指數、美國初請失業金人數、美國Markit製造業PM","text":"聊聊今日份的交易想法，包括對於大盤走勢後續的看法？看漲/看跌哪隻股票、曬曬單等等。 港股市場 6月21日，港股主要指數全線低開，恆指跌1.04%報28501點，國指底0.94%報1546點，恆生科技指數跌1.07%報7955點。 盤面上，鋼鐵股強勢，鞍鋼股份大幅上漲8%；藥品股、電信股、燃氣股多數上漲，此前連續大跌的中國燃氣止跌；光伏股、汽車股、銅、等板塊大跌，體育用品股漲跌不一，$特步國際(01368)$ 跌3%，$李寧(02331)$ 、$361度(01361)$ 小幅高開；大型科技股普跌，$網易-S(09999)$ 跌超3%，$美團-W(03690)$ 、$快手-W(01024)$ 、$小米集團-W(01810)$ 皆跌超1%。 鞍鋼股份漲8%，預計上半年淨利同比增860%。 美股市場 經濟數據方面：中國LPR利率、美國PCE物價指數、美國初請失業金人數、美國Markit製造業PM","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fb7a3e27ec573424a685417a6acc098e","width":"240","height":"240"}],"top":1,"highlighted":2,"essential":2,"paper":2,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/167924304","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":0,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":1,"subType":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":2,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":307,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":167895626,"gmtCreate":1624256862765,"gmtModify":1703831745337,"author":{"id":"3557272953214384","authorId":"3557272953214384","name":"WGSsss","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c859daf551024a3f95b178c72e1b8354","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3557272953214384","authorIdStr":"3557272953214384"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hi all please kindly help me like and comment on this post , thanks in advance . Have a good day.","listText":"Hi all please kindly help me like and comment on this post , thanks in advance . Have a good day.","text":"Hi all please kindly help me like and comment on this post , thanks in advance . Have a good day.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":2,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":16,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/167895626","repostId":"1154249454","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1154249454","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1624230573,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1154249454?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-21 07:09","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Nike, FedEx, Johnson & Johnson, Darden, and Other Stocks for Investors to Watch This Week","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1154249454","media":"barrons","summary":"A handful of notable companies will release their latest results toward the end of this week.Nike,FedEx,andDarden Restaurantswill report on Thursday, followed by CarMax and Paychex on Friday. Wednesday will also feature analyst days and investor events from Johnson & Johnson, GlaxoSmithKline,and Equinix.Economic data out this week include IHS’ Manufacturing and Services Purchasing Managers’ Indexes for June on Wednesday. Both are expected to hold near their record highs. The Census Bureau will r","content":"<p>A handful of notable companies will release their latest results toward the end of this week.Nike,FedEx,andDarden Restaurantswill report on Thursday, followed by CarMax and Paychex on Friday. Wednesday will also feature analyst days and investor events from&nbsp;Johnson &amp;&nbsp;Johnson,&nbsp;GlaxoSmithKline,and&nbsp;Equinix.</p>\n<p>Economic data out this week include IHS’ Manufacturing and Services Purchasing Managers’ Indexes for June on Wednesday. Both are expected to hold near their record highs. The Census Bureau will release the durable-goods report for May on Thursday. Orders—often seen as a decent proxy for business investment—are expected to rise 3.3% month over month.</p>\n<p>And on Friday, the Bureau of Economic Analysis will report personal income and consumption for May. Spending is forecast to continue rising despite a drop off in income as stimulus checks finished being sent out in April.</p>\n<p>Monday 6/21</p>\n<p><b>The Federal Reserve Bank</b>of Chicago releases its National Activity index, a gauge of overall economic activity, for May. Expectations are for a 0.50 reading, higher than April’s 0.24 figure. A positive reading indicates economic growth that is above historical trends.</p>\n<p>Tuesday 6/22</p>\n<p><b>The National Association</b>of Realtors reports existing-home sales for May. Economists forecast a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 5.7 million homes sold, about 150,000 fewer than the April data. Existing-home sales have fallen for three consecutive months, as supply hasn’t been able to keep up with demand.</p>\n<p>Wednesday 6/23</p>\n<p>Equinix hosts its 2021 analyst day, when the company will update its long-term financial outlook.</p>\n<p>GlaxoSmithKline hosts a conference call, featuring its CEO, Emma Walmsley, to update investors on the company’s strategy for growth and shareholder value creation.</p>\n<p>Johnson &amp; Johnson hosts a webcast to discuss its ESG strategy.</p>\n<p><b>The Census Bureau</b>reports new residential construction data for May. Consensus estimate is for a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 875,000 new single-family homes sold, slightly higher than April’s 863,000. Similar to existing-home sales, new-home sales have fallen from their recent peak of 993,000 in January of this year.</p>\n<p><b>IHS Markitreports</b>both its Manufacturing and Services Purchasing Managers’ indexes for June. Expectations are for a 61.5 reading for the Manufacturing PMI, and a 69.8 figure for the Services PMI. Both projections are comparable to the May data as well as being near record highs for their respective indexes.</p>\n<p>Thursday 6/24</p>\n<p><b>The Bureau of Economic Analysis</b>reports the third and final estimate of first-quarter gross-domestic-product growth. Economists forecast a seasonally adjusted annual growth rate of 6.4%.</p>\n<p>Accenture,Darden Restaurants, FedEx, and Nike hold conference calls to discuss quarterly results.</p>\n<p><b>The Bank of England</b>announces its monetary-policy decision. The central bank is widely expected to keep its key interest rate at 0.1%.</p>\n<p><b>The Census Bureau</b>releases the durable-goods report for May. The consensus call is for new orders of manufactured goods to rise 2.8% month over month to $253 billion. Excluding transportation, new orders are projected at 1%, matching the April data.</p>\n<p>Friday 6/25</p>\n<p>CarMax and Paychex report earnings.</p>\n<p><b>The BEA reports</b>personal income and consumption for May. Income is expected to fall 3% month over month, after plummeting 13.1% in April. This reflects a dropoff in stimulus checks that first were sent out in March. Spending is seen rising 0.5%, comparable to the April data.</p>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Nike, FedEx, Johnson & Johnson, Darden, and Other Stocks for Investors to Watch This Week</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nNike, FedEx, Johnson & Johnson, Darden, and Other Stocks for Investors to Watch This Week\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-06-21 07:09 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.barrons.com/articles/nike-fedex-johnson-johnson-darden-and-other-stocks-for-investors-to-watch-this-week-51624215603?mod=hp_LEAD_3><strong>barrons</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>A handful of notable companies will release their latest results toward the end of this week.Nike,FedEx,andDarden Restaurantswill report on Thursday, followed by CarMax and Paychex on Friday. ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/nike-fedex-johnson-johnson-darden-and-other-stocks-for-investors-to-watch-this-week-51624215603?mod=hp_LEAD_3\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NKE":"耐克","JNJ":"强生","DRI":"达登饭店","FDX":"联邦快递"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/nike-fedex-johnson-johnson-darden-and-other-stocks-for-investors-to-watch-this-week-51624215603?mod=hp_LEAD_3","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1154249454","content_text":"A handful of notable companies will release their latest results toward the end of this week.Nike,FedEx,andDarden Restaurantswill report on Thursday, followed by CarMax and Paychex on Friday. Wednesday will also feature analyst days and investor events from Johnson & Johnson, GlaxoSmithKline,and Equinix.\nEconomic data out this week include IHS’ Manufacturing and Services Purchasing Managers’ Indexes for June on Wednesday. Both are expected to hold near their record highs. The Census Bureau will release the durable-goods report for May on Thursday. Orders—often seen as a decent proxy for business investment—are expected to rise 3.3% month over month.\nAnd on Friday, the Bureau of Economic Analysis will report personal income and consumption for May. Spending is forecast to continue rising despite a drop off in income as stimulus checks finished being sent out in April.\nMonday 6/21\nThe Federal Reserve Bankof Chicago releases its National Activity index, a gauge of overall economic activity, for May. Expectations are for a 0.50 reading, higher than April’s 0.24 figure. A positive reading indicates economic growth that is above historical trends.\nTuesday 6/22\nThe National Associationof Realtors reports existing-home sales for May. Economists forecast a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 5.7 million homes sold, about 150,000 fewer than the April data. Existing-home sales have fallen for three consecutive months, as supply hasn’t been able to keep up with demand.\nWednesday 6/23\nEquinix hosts its 2021 analyst day, when the company will update its long-term financial outlook.\nGlaxoSmithKline hosts a conference call, featuring its CEO, Emma Walmsley, to update investors on the company’s strategy for growth and shareholder value creation.\nJohnson & Johnson hosts a webcast to discuss its ESG strategy.\nThe Census Bureaureports new residential construction data for May. Consensus estimate is for a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 875,000 new single-family homes sold, slightly higher than April’s 863,000. Similar to existing-home sales, new-home sales have fallen from their recent peak of 993,000 in January of this year.\nIHS Markitreportsboth its Manufacturing and Services Purchasing Managers’ indexes for June. Expectations are for a 61.5 reading for the Manufacturing PMI, and a 69.8 figure for the Services PMI. Both projections are comparable to the May data as well as being near record highs for their respective indexes.\nThursday 6/24\nThe Bureau of Economic Analysisreports the third and final estimate of first-quarter gross-domestic-product growth. Economists forecast a seasonally adjusted annual growth rate of 6.4%.\nAccenture,Darden Restaurants, FedEx, and Nike hold conference calls to discuss quarterly results.\nThe Bank of Englandannounces its monetary-policy decision. The central bank is widely expected to keep its key interest rate at 0.1%.\nThe Census Bureaureleases the durable-goods report for May. The consensus call is for new orders of manufactured goods to rise 2.8% month over month to $253 billion. Excluding transportation, new orders are projected at 1%, matching the April data.\nFriday 6/25\nCarMax and Paychex report earnings.\nThe BEA reportspersonal income and consumption for May. Income is expected to fall 3% month over month, after plummeting 13.1% in April. This reflects a dropoff in stimulus checks that first were sent out in March. Spending is seen rising 0.5%, comparable to the April data.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":364,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[{"author":{"id":"3557272953214384","authorId":"3557272953214384","name":"WGSsss","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c859daf551024a3f95b178c72e1b8354","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"idStr":"3557272953214384","authorIdStr":"3557272953214384"},"content":"[grimace] [sad] [supercilious look] [money fan] [supercilious look] [speechless] [shy] [bloody] [surprised] [grin] [sad] [supercilious look] [grin] [sad] [grimace] [sad] [grin] [sad] [grimace] [sad] [grin] [sad] [supercilious look] [money fan] [supercilious look] [grin] [sad] [grin] [sad] [supercilious look] [grin] [sad]","text":"[grimace] [sad] [supercilious look] [money fan] [supercilious look] [speechless] [shy] [bloody] [surprised] [grin] [sad] [supercilious look] [grin] [sad] [grimace] [sad] [grin] [sad] [grimace] [sad] [grin] [sad] [supercilious look] [money fan] [supercilious look] [grin] [sad] [grin] [sad] [supercilious look] [grin] [sad]","html":"[grimace] [sad] [supercilious look] [money fan] [supercilious look] [speechless] [shy] [bloody] [surprised] [grin] [sad] [supercilious look] [grin] [sad] [grimace] [sad] [grin] [sad] [grimace] [sad] [grin] [sad] [supercilious look] [money fan] [supercilious look] [grin] [sad] [grin] [sad] [supercilious look] [grin] [sad]"}],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":164908403,"gmtCreate":1624163787702,"gmtModify":1703829937305,"author":{"id":"3557272953214384","authorId":"3557272953214384","name":"WGSsss","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c859daf551024a3f95b178c72e1b8354","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3557272953214384","authorIdStr":"3557272953214384"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"//<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/U/3557272953214384\">@LemonCc</a>: It Worth to have a look. Please like and comment&nbsp;","listText":"//<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/U/3557272953214384\">@LemonCc</a>: It Worth to have a look. Please like and comment&nbsp;","text":"//@LemonCc: It Worth to have a look. Please like and comment","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/164908403","repostId":"1133385197","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1133385197","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1624151969,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1133385197?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-20 09:19","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Answering the great inflation question of our time","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1133385197","media":"finance.yahoo","summary":"Prices of everything; a house in Phoenix, a Ford F-150, a plane ticket to New York, have all gone up","content":"<p>Prices of everything; a house in Phoenix, a Ford F-150, a plane ticket to New York, have all gone up. That much is true.</p>\n<p>Unfortunately pretty much everything else about inflation—a red hot topic these days—is conjecture. And that’s vexing, not just for the dismal scientists (aka economists), but for all of us, because whether or not prices are really rising, by how much and for how long, has massive implications in our lives. Or as Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody’s Analytics, says: “Inflation is one of the mysteries of economic study and thought. A difficult thing to gauge and forecast and get right. That’s why the risks are high.”</p>\n<p>The current debate over inflation really revolves around two questions: First, is this current spate of inflation, just that, a spate—or to use Wall Street’s buzzword of the moment, “transitory,”—or not? (Just to give you an idea of how buzzy, when I Google the word “transitory” the search engine suggests “inflation” after it.) And second, transitory (aka temporary) inflation or not, what does it suggest for the economy and markets?</p>\n<p>Before I get into that, let me lay out what’s going on with prices right now. First, know that inflation,which peaked in 1980 at an annualized rate of 13.55%,has been tame for quite some time, specifically 4% or less for nearly 30 years. Which means that anyone 40 years old or younger has no experience with inflation other than maybe from an Econ 101 textbook. Obviously that could be a problem.</p>\n<p>As an aside I remember President Ford in 1974 trying to jawbone inflation down with his \"Whip Inflation Now\" campaign, which featured“Win” buttons,earringsand evenugly sweaters.None of this worked and it took draconian measures by Fed Chair Paul Volcker (raising rates and targeting money supply,as described by Former President of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, William Poole)to eventually tame inflation and keep it under wraps for all those years.</p>\n<p>Until now perhaps. Last week theLabor Department reported that consumer prices (the CPI, or consumer price index) rose 5% in May,the fastest annual rate in nearly 13 years—which was when the economy was overheating from the housing boom which subsequently went bust and sent the economy off a cliff and into the Great Recession. Core inflation, which excludes volatile food and energy prices, was up 3.8%, the biggest increase since May 1992. (For the record, the likelihood of the economy tanking right now is de minimis.)</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/87f75dfcb98fb5a0e7c3f9d3f8d336e2\" tg-width=\"705\" tg-height=\"412\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>Used car and truck prices are a major driver of inflation, climbing 7.3% last month and 29.7% over the past year. New car prices are up too, which have pushed upshares of Ford and GM a remarkable 40% plus this year.Clearly Americans want to buy vehicles to go on vacation and get back to work. And Yahoo Finance’sJanna Herron reportsthat rents are rising at their fastest pace in 15 years.</p>\n<p>To be sure, not all prices are climbing.As Yahoo Finance’s Rick Newman points out,prices are not up much at all for health care, education and are basically flat for technology, including computers, smartphones and internet service (an important point which we’ll get back to.)</p>\n<p>But that’s the counterpoint really. Americans are obsessed with cars, housing is critical and many of us are experiencing sticker shock booking travel this summer. Higher prices are front and center. Wall Street too is in a tizzy about inflation, and concerns about it and more importantly Federal Reserve policy in response to inflation (see below), sent stocks lower with the S&amp;P 500 down 1.91% this week, its worst week since February.</p>\n<p>Given this backdrop, the tension (such as it is) was high when the Fed met this week to deliver its forecast and for Chair Jay Powell to answer questions from the media. Or at least so said hedge fund honcho Paul Tudor Jones,who characterized the proceedings on CNBCas “the most important meeting in [Chairman] Jay Powell’s career, certainly the most important Fed meeting of the past four or five years.” Jones was critical of the Fed, which he believes is now stimulating the economy unnecessarily by keeping interest rates low and by buying financial assets. Unnecessarily, Jones says, because the economy is already running hot and needs no support. The Fed (which is in the transitory camp when it comes to inflation) risks overheating the economy by creating runaway inflation, according to PTJ.</p>\n<p>Now I don’t see eye to eye with Jones on this, though I should point out, he's a billionaire from investing in financial markets, and let’s just say I’m not. I should also point out that Jones, 66, is in fact old enough to remember inflation, never mind that as a young man he called the 1987 stock market crash. So we should all ignore Jones at our peril.</p>\n<p>As for what the Fed put forth this past Wednesday, well it wasn’t much, signaling an expectation ofraising interest rates twice by the end of 2023(yes, that is down the road.) And Powell, who’s become much more adept at not rippling the waters these days after some rougher forays earlier in his tenure, didn’t drop any bombshells in the presser.</p>\n<p>Which brings us to the question of why the Federal Reserve isn’t so concerned about inflation and thinks it is mostly—here’s that word again—transitory. To answer that, we need to first address why prices are rising right now, which can be summed up in one very familiar abbreviation: COVID-19. When COVID hit last spring the economy collapsed, which crushed demand in sectors like leisure, travel and retail. Now the economy is roaring back to life and businesses can raise prices, certainly over 2020 levels.</p>\n<p>“We clearly should’ve expected it,” says William Spriggs, chief economist at the AFL-CIO and a professor of economics at Howard University. “You can’t shut down the economy and think you turn on the switch [without some inflation].”</p>\n<p>“We had a pandemic that forced an artificial shutdown of the economy in a way that even the collapse of the financial system and the housing market didn’t, and we had a snapback at a rate we’ve never seen before—not because of the fundamentals driving recovery but because of government,” says Joel Naroff, president and chief economist of Naroff Economics.</p>\n<p>COVID had other secondary effects on the economy though, besides just ultimately producing a snapback. For one thing, the pandemic throttled supply chains, specifically the shipping of parts and components from one part of the globe to another. It also confused managers about how much to produce and therefore how many parts to order.</p>\n<p>A prime example here is what happened to the chip (semiconductor) and auto industrieswhich I wrote about last month.Car makers thought no one would buy vehicles during the pandemic and pared back their orders with chipmakers, (which were having a tough time shipping their chips anyway.) Turned out the car guys were wrong, millions of people wanted cars and trucks, but the automakers didn’t have enough chips for their cars and had to curb production. Fewer vehicles and strong demand led to higher new car prices, which cascaded to used car prices then to car rental rates. Net net, all the friction and slowness of getting things delivered now adds to costs which causes companies to raise prices.</p>\n<p>Another secondary effect of COVID which has been inflationary comes from employment,which I got into a bit last week.We all know millions were thrown out of work by COVID last year, many of whom were backstopped by government payments that could add up to $600 a week (state and federal.) These folks have been none too keen on coming back to work for minimum wage, or $290 a week. So to lure them back employers are having to pay more, which puts more money in people's pockets which allows stores for example to raise prices.</p>\n<p><b>Anti-inflation forces</b></p>\n<p>But here’s the big-time question: If COVID was temporary, and therefore its effects are temporary and inflation is one of its effects then doesn’t it follow, ipso facto, that inflation is (OK I’ll say it again), transitory?</p>\n<p>I say yes, (with a bit of a caveat.) And most economists, like Claudia Sahm, a senior fellow at the Jain Family Institute and a former Federal Reserve economist, agree. “‘Transitory’ has become a buzzword,” she says. “It is important to be more concrete about what we mean by that. We’re probably going to see in the next few months inflation numbers that are bigger than average, but as long as they keep stepping down, that’s the sign of it being transitory. If we didn’t see any sign of inflation stepping down some, it would’ve started feeling like ‘Houston, we have a problem.’”</p>\n<p>To buttress my argument beyond that above \"if-then\" syllogism, let’s take a look at why inflation has been so low for the past three decades.</p>\n<p>To me this is mostly obvious. Prices have been tamped down by the greatest anti-inflation force of our lifetime, that being technology, specifically the explosion of consumer technology. Think about it. The first wave of technology, a good example would be IBM mainframes, saved big companies money in back-office functions, savings which they mostly kept for themselves (higher profits) and their shareholders. But the four great landmark events in the advent of consumer technology; the introduction ofthe PC in 1974 (MITS Altair),the Netscape IPO of 1995,Google search in 1998,and the launch of theiPhone in 2007(I remember Steve Jobs demoing it to me like it was yesterday), greatly accelerated, broadened and deepened this deflationary trend.</p>\n<p>Not only has technology been pushing down the cost of everything from drilling for oil, to manufacturing clothes to farming, and allowing for the creation of groundbreaking (and deflationary) competitors like Uber, Airbnb and Netflix, but it also let consumers find—on their phones—the most affordable trip to Hawaii, the least expensive haircut or the best deal on Nikes.</p>\n<p>So technology has reduced the cost of almost everything and will continue to do so the rest of our lifetime. Bottom line: Unless something terrible happens, the power of technology will outweigh and outlive COVID.</p>\n<p>There is one mitigating factor and that is globalism, which is connected to both technology and COVID. Let me briefly explain.</p>\n<p>After World War II, most of humanity has become more and more connected in terms of trade, communication, travel, etc. (See supply chain above.) Technology of course was a major enabler here; better ships, planes and faster internet, all of which as it grew more potent, accelerated globalism. Another element was the introduction of political constructs like the World Trade Organization and NAFTA. (I think of the Clinton administration andChina joining the WTO in 2001as perhaps the high-water marks of globalization.)</p>\n<p>Like its technological cousin, globalism has deflationary effects particularly on the labor front as companies could more and more easily find lowest cost countries to produce goods and source materials. And like technology, globalization seemed inexorable, which it was, until it wasn’t. Political winds, manifested by the likes of Brexit and leaders like Putin, Xi Jinping, Erdogan, Bolsonaro, Duterte and of course Donald Trump have caused globalism to wane and anti-globalism and nationalism to wax.</p>\n<p>The internet too, once seen as only a great connector, has also become a global divider, as the world increasingly fractures into Chinese, U.S. and European walled digital zones when it comes to social media and search for example. Security risks, privacy, spying and hacking of course divide us further here too.</p>\n<p>So technology, which had made globalism stronger and stronger, now also makes it weaker and weaker.</p>\n<p>COVID plays a role in rethinking globalism as it exposes vulnerabilities in the supply chain. Companies that were rethinking their manufacturing in China but considering another country, are now wondering if it just makes sense to repatriate the whole shebang. Supply chains that were optimized for cost only are being rethought with security and reliability being factored in and that costs money.</p>\n<p>How significant is this decline in globalization and how permanent is it? Good questions. But my point here is whether or not \"globalism disrupted\" is transitory (!) or not, it could push prices up, (in the short and intermediate run at least), as cost is sacrificed for predictability. Longer term I say Americans are a resourceful people. We’ll figure out how to make cost effective stuff in the U.S. It’s also likely that globalism will trend upward again, though perhaps not as unfettered as it once was.</p>\n<p>More downward pressure on pricing could come from shifts in employment practices. Mark Zandi points out that “the work-from-anywhere dynamic could depress wage growth and prices. If I don’t need to work in New York anymore and could live in Tampa, it stands to reason my wage could get cut or I won’t get the same wage increase in the future.”</p>\n<p>And so what is Zandi’s take on transitory? “What we’re observing now is prices going back to pre-pandemic,” he says. “The price spikes we’re experiencing now will continue for the next few months through summer but certainly by the end of year, this time next year, they will have disappeared. I do think underlying inflation will be higher post-pandemic than pre-pandemic, but that’s a feature not a bug.”</p>\n<p>I don’t disagree. To me it’s simple: The technology wave I’ve described above is bigger than COVID and bigger than the rise and fall of globalism. And that is why, ladies and gentlemen, I believe inflation will be transitory, certainly in the long run. (Though I’m well aware of whatJohn Maynard Keynes said about the long run.)</p>","source":"lsy1612507957220","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Answering the great inflation question of our time</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAnswering the great inflation question of our time\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-06-20 09:19 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/answering-the-great-inflation-question-of-our-time-114153460.html><strong>finance.yahoo</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Prices of everything; a house in Phoenix, a Ford F-150, a plane ticket to New York, have all gone up. That much is true.\nUnfortunately pretty much everything else about inflation—a red hot topic these...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/answering-the-great-inflation-question-of-our-time-114153460.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/answering-the-great-inflation-question-of-our-time-114153460.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1133385197","content_text":"Prices of everything; a house in Phoenix, a Ford F-150, a plane ticket to New York, have all gone up. That much is true.\nUnfortunately pretty much everything else about inflation—a red hot topic these days—is conjecture. And that’s vexing, not just for the dismal scientists (aka economists), but for all of us, because whether or not prices are really rising, by how much and for how long, has massive implications in our lives. Or as Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody’s Analytics, says: “Inflation is one of the mysteries of economic study and thought. A difficult thing to gauge and forecast and get right. That’s why the risks are high.”\nThe current debate over inflation really revolves around two questions: First, is this current spate of inflation, just that, a spate—or to use Wall Street’s buzzword of the moment, “transitory,”—or not? (Just to give you an idea of how buzzy, when I Google the word “transitory” the search engine suggests “inflation” after it.) And second, transitory (aka temporary) inflation or not, what does it suggest for the economy and markets?\nBefore I get into that, let me lay out what’s going on with prices right now. First, know that inflation,which peaked in 1980 at an annualized rate of 13.55%,has been tame for quite some time, specifically 4% or less for nearly 30 years. Which means that anyone 40 years old or younger has no experience with inflation other than maybe from an Econ 101 textbook. Obviously that could be a problem.\nAs an aside I remember President Ford in 1974 trying to jawbone inflation down with his \"Whip Inflation Now\" campaign, which featured“Win” buttons,earringsand evenugly sweaters.None of this worked and it took draconian measures by Fed Chair Paul Volcker (raising rates and targeting money supply,as described by Former President of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, William Poole)to eventually tame inflation and keep it under wraps for all those years.\nUntil now perhaps. Last week theLabor Department reported that consumer prices (the CPI, or consumer price index) rose 5% in May,the fastest annual rate in nearly 13 years—which was when the economy was overheating from the housing boom which subsequently went bust and sent the economy off a cliff and into the Great Recession. Core inflation, which excludes volatile food and energy prices, was up 3.8%, the biggest increase since May 1992. (For the record, the likelihood of the economy tanking right now is de minimis.)\n\nUsed car and truck prices are a major driver of inflation, climbing 7.3% last month and 29.7% over the past year. New car prices are up too, which have pushed upshares of Ford and GM a remarkable 40% plus this year.Clearly Americans want to buy vehicles to go on vacation and get back to work. And Yahoo Finance’sJanna Herron reportsthat rents are rising at their fastest pace in 15 years.\nTo be sure, not all prices are climbing.As Yahoo Finance’s Rick Newman points out,prices are not up much at all for health care, education and are basically flat for technology, including computers, smartphones and internet service (an important point which we’ll get back to.)\nBut that’s the counterpoint really. Americans are obsessed with cars, housing is critical and many of us are experiencing sticker shock booking travel this summer. Higher prices are front and center. Wall Street too is in a tizzy about inflation, and concerns about it and more importantly Federal Reserve policy in response to inflation (see below), sent stocks lower with the S&P 500 down 1.91% this week, its worst week since February.\nGiven this backdrop, the tension (such as it is) was high when the Fed met this week to deliver its forecast and for Chair Jay Powell to answer questions from the media. Or at least so said hedge fund honcho Paul Tudor Jones,who characterized the proceedings on CNBCas “the most important meeting in [Chairman] Jay Powell’s career, certainly the most important Fed meeting of the past four or five years.” Jones was critical of the Fed, which he believes is now stimulating the economy unnecessarily by keeping interest rates low and by buying financial assets. Unnecessarily, Jones says, because the economy is already running hot and needs no support. The Fed (which is in the transitory camp when it comes to inflation) risks overheating the economy by creating runaway inflation, according to PTJ.\nNow I don’t see eye to eye with Jones on this, though I should point out, he's a billionaire from investing in financial markets, and let’s just say I’m not. I should also point out that Jones, 66, is in fact old enough to remember inflation, never mind that as a young man he called the 1987 stock market crash. So we should all ignore Jones at our peril.\nAs for what the Fed put forth this past Wednesday, well it wasn’t much, signaling an expectation ofraising interest rates twice by the end of 2023(yes, that is down the road.) And Powell, who’s become much more adept at not rippling the waters these days after some rougher forays earlier in his tenure, didn’t drop any bombshells in the presser.\nWhich brings us to the question of why the Federal Reserve isn’t so concerned about inflation and thinks it is mostly—here’s that word again—transitory. To answer that, we need to first address why prices are rising right now, which can be summed up in one very familiar abbreviation: COVID-19. When COVID hit last spring the economy collapsed, which crushed demand in sectors like leisure, travel and retail. Now the economy is roaring back to life and businesses can raise prices, certainly over 2020 levels.\n“We clearly should’ve expected it,” says William Spriggs, chief economist at the AFL-CIO and a professor of economics at Howard University. “You can’t shut down the economy and think you turn on the switch [without some inflation].”\n“We had a pandemic that forced an artificial shutdown of the economy in a way that even the collapse of the financial system and the housing market didn’t, and we had a snapback at a rate we’ve never seen before—not because of the fundamentals driving recovery but because of government,” says Joel Naroff, president and chief economist of Naroff Economics.\nCOVID had other secondary effects on the economy though, besides just ultimately producing a snapback. For one thing, the pandemic throttled supply chains, specifically the shipping of parts and components from one part of the globe to another. It also confused managers about how much to produce and therefore how many parts to order.\nA prime example here is what happened to the chip (semiconductor) and auto industrieswhich I wrote about last month.Car makers thought no one would buy vehicles during the pandemic and pared back their orders with chipmakers, (which were having a tough time shipping their chips anyway.) Turned out the car guys were wrong, millions of people wanted cars and trucks, but the automakers didn’t have enough chips for their cars and had to curb production. Fewer vehicles and strong demand led to higher new car prices, which cascaded to used car prices then to car rental rates. Net net, all the friction and slowness of getting things delivered now adds to costs which causes companies to raise prices.\nAnother secondary effect of COVID which has been inflationary comes from employment,which I got into a bit last week.We all know millions were thrown out of work by COVID last year, many of whom were backstopped by government payments that could add up to $600 a week (state and federal.) These folks have been none too keen on coming back to work for minimum wage, or $290 a week. So to lure them back employers are having to pay more, which puts more money in people's pockets which allows stores for example to raise prices.\nAnti-inflation forces\nBut here’s the big-time question: If COVID was temporary, and therefore its effects are temporary and inflation is one of its effects then doesn’t it follow, ipso facto, that inflation is (OK I’ll say it again), transitory?\nI say yes, (with a bit of a caveat.) And most economists, like Claudia Sahm, a senior fellow at the Jain Family Institute and a former Federal Reserve economist, agree. “‘Transitory’ has become a buzzword,” she says. “It is important to be more concrete about what we mean by that. We’re probably going to see in the next few months inflation numbers that are bigger than average, but as long as they keep stepping down, that’s the sign of it being transitory. If we didn’t see any sign of inflation stepping down some, it would’ve started feeling like ‘Houston, we have a problem.’”\nTo buttress my argument beyond that above \"if-then\" syllogism, let’s take a look at why inflation has been so low for the past three decades.\nTo me this is mostly obvious. Prices have been tamped down by the greatest anti-inflation force of our lifetime, that being technology, specifically the explosion of consumer technology. Think about it. The first wave of technology, a good example would be IBM mainframes, saved big companies money in back-office functions, savings which they mostly kept for themselves (higher profits) and their shareholders. But the four great landmark events in the advent of consumer technology; the introduction ofthe PC in 1974 (MITS Altair),the Netscape IPO of 1995,Google search in 1998,and the launch of theiPhone in 2007(I remember Steve Jobs demoing it to me like it was yesterday), greatly accelerated, broadened and deepened this deflationary trend.\nNot only has technology been pushing down the cost of everything from drilling for oil, to manufacturing clothes to farming, and allowing for the creation of groundbreaking (and deflationary) competitors like Uber, Airbnb and Netflix, but it also let consumers find—on their phones—the most affordable trip to Hawaii, the least expensive haircut or the best deal on Nikes.\nSo technology has reduced the cost of almost everything and will continue to do so the rest of our lifetime. Bottom line: Unless something terrible happens, the power of technology will outweigh and outlive COVID.\nThere is one mitigating factor and that is globalism, which is connected to both technology and COVID. Let me briefly explain.\nAfter World War II, most of humanity has become more and more connected in terms of trade, communication, travel, etc. (See supply chain above.) Technology of course was a major enabler here; better ships, planes and faster internet, all of which as it grew more potent, accelerated globalism. Another element was the introduction of political constructs like the World Trade Organization and NAFTA. (I think of the Clinton administration andChina joining the WTO in 2001as perhaps the high-water marks of globalization.)\nLike its technological cousin, globalism has deflationary effects particularly on the labor front as companies could more and more easily find lowest cost countries to produce goods and source materials. And like technology, globalization seemed inexorable, which it was, until it wasn’t. Political winds, manifested by the likes of Brexit and leaders like Putin, Xi Jinping, Erdogan, Bolsonaro, Duterte and of course Donald Trump have caused globalism to wane and anti-globalism and nationalism to wax.\nThe internet too, once seen as only a great connector, has also become a global divider, as the world increasingly fractures into Chinese, U.S. and European walled digital zones when it comes to social media and search for example. Security risks, privacy, spying and hacking of course divide us further here too.\nSo technology, which had made globalism stronger and stronger, now also makes it weaker and weaker.\nCOVID plays a role in rethinking globalism as it exposes vulnerabilities in the supply chain. Companies that were rethinking their manufacturing in China but considering another country, are now wondering if it just makes sense to repatriate the whole shebang. Supply chains that were optimized for cost only are being rethought with security and reliability being factored in and that costs money.\nHow significant is this decline in globalization and how permanent is it? Good questions. But my point here is whether or not \"globalism disrupted\" is transitory (!) or not, it could push prices up, (in the short and intermediate run at least), as cost is sacrificed for predictability. Longer term I say Americans are a resourceful people. We’ll figure out how to make cost effective stuff in the U.S. It’s also likely that globalism will trend upward again, though perhaps not as unfettered as it once was.\nMore downward pressure on pricing could come from shifts in employment practices. Mark Zandi points out that “the work-from-anywhere dynamic could depress wage growth and prices. If I don’t need to work in New York anymore and could live in Tampa, it stands to reason my wage could get cut or I won’t get the same wage increase in the future.”\nAnd so what is Zandi’s take on transitory? “What we’re observing now is prices going back to pre-pandemic,” he says. “The price spikes we’re experiencing now will continue for the next few months through summer but certainly by the end of year, this time next year, they will have disappeared. I do think underlying inflation will be higher post-pandemic than pre-pandemic, but that’s a feature not a bug.”\nI don’t disagree. To me it’s simple: The technology wave I’ve described above is bigger than COVID and bigger than the rise and fall of globalism. And that is why, ladies and gentlemen, I believe inflation will be transitory, certainly in the long run. (Though I’m well aware of whatJohn Maynard Keynes said about the long run.)","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":827,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":165723580,"gmtCreate":1624158442640,"gmtModify":1703829738453,"author":{"id":"3557272953214384","authorId":"3557272953214384","name":"WGSsss","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c859daf551024a3f95b178c72e1b8354","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3557272953214384","authorIdStr":"3557272953214384"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"It Worth to have a look. Please like and comment&nbsp;","listText":"It Worth to have a look. Please like and comment&nbsp;","text":"It Worth to have a look. Please like and comment","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":2,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":14,"commentSize":68,"repostSize":1,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/165723580","repostId":"1133385197","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1133385197","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1624151969,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1133385197?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-20 09:19","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Answering the great inflation question of our time","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1133385197","media":"finance.yahoo","summary":"Prices of everything; a house in Phoenix, a Ford F-150, a plane ticket to New York, have all gone up","content":"<p>Prices of everything; a house in Phoenix, a Ford F-150, a plane ticket to New York, have all gone up. That much is true.</p>\n<p>Unfortunately pretty much everything else about inflation—a red hot topic these days—is conjecture. And that’s vexing, not just for the dismal scientists (aka economists), but for all of us, because whether or not prices are really rising, by how much and for how long, has massive implications in our lives. Or as Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody’s Analytics, says: “Inflation is one of the mysteries of economic study and thought. A difficult thing to gauge and forecast and get right. That’s why the risks are high.”</p>\n<p>The current debate over inflation really revolves around two questions: First, is this current spate of inflation, just that, a spate—or to use Wall Street’s buzzword of the moment, “transitory,”—or not? (Just to give you an idea of how buzzy, when I Google the word “transitory” the search engine suggests “inflation” after it.) And second, transitory (aka temporary) inflation or not, what does it suggest for the economy and markets?</p>\n<p>Before I get into that, let me lay out what’s going on with prices right now. First, know that inflation,which peaked in 1980 at an annualized rate of 13.55%,has been tame for quite some time, specifically 4% or less for nearly 30 years. Which means that anyone 40 years old or younger has no experience with inflation other than maybe from an Econ 101 textbook. Obviously that could be a problem.</p>\n<p>As an aside I remember President Ford in 1974 trying to jawbone inflation down with his \"Whip Inflation Now\" campaign, which featured“Win” buttons,earringsand evenugly sweaters.None of this worked and it took draconian measures by Fed Chair Paul Volcker (raising rates and targeting money supply,as described by Former President of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, William Poole)to eventually tame inflation and keep it under wraps for all those years.</p>\n<p>Until now perhaps. Last week theLabor Department reported that consumer prices (the CPI, or consumer price index) rose 5% in May,the fastest annual rate in nearly 13 years—which was when the economy was overheating from the housing boom which subsequently went bust and sent the economy off a cliff and into the Great Recession. Core inflation, which excludes volatile food and energy prices, was up 3.8%, the biggest increase since May 1992. (For the record, the likelihood of the economy tanking right now is de minimis.)</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/87f75dfcb98fb5a0e7c3f9d3f8d336e2\" tg-width=\"705\" tg-height=\"412\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>Used car and truck prices are a major driver of inflation, climbing 7.3% last month and 29.7% over the past year. New car prices are up too, which have pushed upshares of Ford and GM a remarkable 40% plus this year.Clearly Americans want to buy vehicles to go on vacation and get back to work. And Yahoo Finance’sJanna Herron reportsthat rents are rising at their fastest pace in 15 years.</p>\n<p>To be sure, not all prices are climbing.As Yahoo Finance’s Rick Newman points out,prices are not up much at all for health care, education and are basically flat for technology, including computers, smartphones and internet service (an important point which we’ll get back to.)</p>\n<p>But that’s the counterpoint really. Americans are obsessed with cars, housing is critical and many of us are experiencing sticker shock booking travel this summer. Higher prices are front and center. Wall Street too is in a tizzy about inflation, and concerns about it and more importantly Federal Reserve policy in response to inflation (see below), sent stocks lower with the S&amp;P 500 down 1.91% this week, its worst week since February.</p>\n<p>Given this backdrop, the tension (such as it is) was high when the Fed met this week to deliver its forecast and for Chair Jay Powell to answer questions from the media. Or at least so said hedge fund honcho Paul Tudor Jones,who characterized the proceedings on CNBCas “the most important meeting in [Chairman] Jay Powell’s career, certainly the most important Fed meeting of the past four or five years.” Jones was critical of the Fed, which he believes is now stimulating the economy unnecessarily by keeping interest rates low and by buying financial assets. Unnecessarily, Jones says, because the economy is already running hot and needs no support. The Fed (which is in the transitory camp when it comes to inflation) risks overheating the economy by creating runaway inflation, according to PTJ.</p>\n<p>Now I don’t see eye to eye with Jones on this, though I should point out, he's a billionaire from investing in financial markets, and let’s just say I’m not. I should also point out that Jones, 66, is in fact old enough to remember inflation, never mind that as a young man he called the 1987 stock market crash. So we should all ignore Jones at our peril.</p>\n<p>As for what the Fed put forth this past Wednesday, well it wasn’t much, signaling an expectation ofraising interest rates twice by the end of 2023(yes, that is down the road.) And Powell, who’s become much more adept at not rippling the waters these days after some rougher forays earlier in his tenure, didn’t drop any bombshells in the presser.</p>\n<p>Which brings us to the question of why the Federal Reserve isn’t so concerned about inflation and thinks it is mostly—here’s that word again—transitory. To answer that, we need to first address why prices are rising right now, which can be summed up in one very familiar abbreviation: COVID-19. When COVID hit last spring the economy collapsed, which crushed demand in sectors like leisure, travel and retail. Now the economy is roaring back to life and businesses can raise prices, certainly over 2020 levels.</p>\n<p>“We clearly should’ve expected it,” says William Spriggs, chief economist at the AFL-CIO and a professor of economics at Howard University. “You can’t shut down the economy and think you turn on the switch [without some inflation].”</p>\n<p>“We had a pandemic that forced an artificial shutdown of the economy in a way that even the collapse of the financial system and the housing market didn’t, and we had a snapback at a rate we’ve never seen before—not because of the fundamentals driving recovery but because of government,” says Joel Naroff, president and chief economist of Naroff Economics.</p>\n<p>COVID had other secondary effects on the economy though, besides just ultimately producing a snapback. For one thing, the pandemic throttled supply chains, specifically the shipping of parts and components from one part of the globe to another. It also confused managers about how much to produce and therefore how many parts to order.</p>\n<p>A prime example here is what happened to the chip (semiconductor) and auto industrieswhich I wrote about last month.Car makers thought no one would buy vehicles during the pandemic and pared back their orders with chipmakers, (which were having a tough time shipping their chips anyway.) Turned out the car guys were wrong, millions of people wanted cars and trucks, but the automakers didn’t have enough chips for their cars and had to curb production. Fewer vehicles and strong demand led to higher new car prices, which cascaded to used car prices then to car rental rates. Net net, all the friction and slowness of getting things delivered now adds to costs which causes companies to raise prices.</p>\n<p>Another secondary effect of COVID which has been inflationary comes from employment,which I got into a bit last week.We all know millions were thrown out of work by COVID last year, many of whom were backstopped by government payments that could add up to $600 a week (state and federal.) These folks have been none too keen on coming back to work for minimum wage, or $290 a week. So to lure them back employers are having to pay more, which puts more money in people's pockets which allows stores for example to raise prices.</p>\n<p><b>Anti-inflation forces</b></p>\n<p>But here’s the big-time question: If COVID was temporary, and therefore its effects are temporary and inflation is one of its effects then doesn’t it follow, ipso facto, that inflation is (OK I’ll say it again), transitory?</p>\n<p>I say yes, (with a bit of a caveat.) And most economists, like Claudia Sahm, a senior fellow at the Jain Family Institute and a former Federal Reserve economist, agree. “‘Transitory’ has become a buzzword,” she says. “It is important to be more concrete about what we mean by that. We’re probably going to see in the next few months inflation numbers that are bigger than average, but as long as they keep stepping down, that’s the sign of it being transitory. If we didn’t see any sign of inflation stepping down some, it would’ve started feeling like ‘Houston, we have a problem.’”</p>\n<p>To buttress my argument beyond that above \"if-then\" syllogism, let’s take a look at why inflation has been so low for the past three decades.</p>\n<p>To me this is mostly obvious. Prices have been tamped down by the greatest anti-inflation force of our lifetime, that being technology, specifically the explosion of consumer technology. Think about it. The first wave of technology, a good example would be IBM mainframes, saved big companies money in back-office functions, savings which they mostly kept for themselves (higher profits) and their shareholders. But the four great landmark events in the advent of consumer technology; the introduction ofthe PC in 1974 (MITS Altair),the Netscape IPO of 1995,Google search in 1998,and the launch of theiPhone in 2007(I remember Steve Jobs demoing it to me like it was yesterday), greatly accelerated, broadened and deepened this deflationary trend.</p>\n<p>Not only has technology been pushing down the cost of everything from drilling for oil, to manufacturing clothes to farming, and allowing for the creation of groundbreaking (and deflationary) competitors like Uber, Airbnb and Netflix, but it also let consumers find—on their phones—the most affordable trip to Hawaii, the least expensive haircut or the best deal on Nikes.</p>\n<p>So technology has reduced the cost of almost everything and will continue to do so the rest of our lifetime. Bottom line: Unless something terrible happens, the power of technology will outweigh and outlive COVID.</p>\n<p>There is one mitigating factor and that is globalism, which is connected to both technology and COVID. Let me briefly explain.</p>\n<p>After World War II, most of humanity has become more and more connected in terms of trade, communication, travel, etc. (See supply chain above.) Technology of course was a major enabler here; better ships, planes and faster internet, all of which as it grew more potent, accelerated globalism. Another element was the introduction of political constructs like the World Trade Organization and NAFTA. (I think of the Clinton administration andChina joining the WTO in 2001as perhaps the high-water marks of globalization.)</p>\n<p>Like its technological cousin, globalism has deflationary effects particularly on the labor front as companies could more and more easily find lowest cost countries to produce goods and source materials. And like technology, globalization seemed inexorable, which it was, until it wasn’t. Political winds, manifested by the likes of Brexit and leaders like Putin, Xi Jinping, Erdogan, Bolsonaro, Duterte and of course Donald Trump have caused globalism to wane and anti-globalism and nationalism to wax.</p>\n<p>The internet too, once seen as only a great connector, has also become a global divider, as the world increasingly fractures into Chinese, U.S. and European walled digital zones when it comes to social media and search for example. Security risks, privacy, spying and hacking of course divide us further here too.</p>\n<p>So technology, which had made globalism stronger and stronger, now also makes it weaker and weaker.</p>\n<p>COVID plays a role in rethinking globalism as it exposes vulnerabilities in the supply chain. Companies that were rethinking their manufacturing in China but considering another country, are now wondering if it just makes sense to repatriate the whole shebang. Supply chains that were optimized for cost only are being rethought with security and reliability being factored in and that costs money.</p>\n<p>How significant is this decline in globalization and how permanent is it? Good questions. But my point here is whether or not \"globalism disrupted\" is transitory (!) or not, it could push prices up, (in the short and intermediate run at least), as cost is sacrificed for predictability. Longer term I say Americans are a resourceful people. We’ll figure out how to make cost effective stuff in the U.S. It’s also likely that globalism will trend upward again, though perhaps not as unfettered as it once was.</p>\n<p>More downward pressure on pricing could come from shifts in employment practices. Mark Zandi points out that “the work-from-anywhere dynamic could depress wage growth and prices. If I don’t need to work in New York anymore and could live in Tampa, it stands to reason my wage could get cut or I won’t get the same wage increase in the future.”</p>\n<p>And so what is Zandi’s take on transitory? “What we’re observing now is prices going back to pre-pandemic,” he says. “The price spikes we’re experiencing now will continue for the next few months through summer but certainly by the end of year, this time next year, they will have disappeared. I do think underlying inflation will be higher post-pandemic than pre-pandemic, but that’s a feature not a bug.”</p>\n<p>I don’t disagree. To me it’s simple: The technology wave I’ve described above is bigger than COVID and bigger than the rise and fall of globalism. And that is why, ladies and gentlemen, I believe inflation will be transitory, certainly in the long run. (Though I’m well aware of whatJohn Maynard Keynes said about the long run.)</p>","source":"lsy1612507957220","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Answering the great inflation question of our time</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAnswering the great inflation question of our time\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-06-20 09:19 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/answering-the-great-inflation-question-of-our-time-114153460.html><strong>finance.yahoo</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Prices of everything; a house in Phoenix, a Ford F-150, a plane ticket to New York, have all gone up. That much is true.\nUnfortunately pretty much everything else about inflation—a red hot topic these...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/answering-the-great-inflation-question-of-our-time-114153460.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/answering-the-great-inflation-question-of-our-time-114153460.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1133385197","content_text":"Prices of everything; a house in Phoenix, a Ford F-150, a plane ticket to New York, have all gone up. That much is true.\nUnfortunately pretty much everything else about inflation—a red hot topic these days—is conjecture. And that’s vexing, not just for the dismal scientists (aka economists), but for all of us, because whether or not prices are really rising, by how much and for how long, has massive implications in our lives. Or as Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody’s Analytics, says: “Inflation is one of the mysteries of economic study and thought. A difficult thing to gauge and forecast and get right. That’s why the risks are high.”\nThe current debate over inflation really revolves around two questions: First, is this current spate of inflation, just that, a spate—or to use Wall Street’s buzzword of the moment, “transitory,”—or not? (Just to give you an idea of how buzzy, when I Google the word “transitory” the search engine suggests “inflation” after it.) And second, transitory (aka temporary) inflation or not, what does it suggest for the economy and markets?\nBefore I get into that, let me lay out what’s going on with prices right now. First, know that inflation,which peaked in 1980 at an annualized rate of 13.55%,has been tame for quite some time, specifically 4% or less for nearly 30 years. Which means that anyone 40 years old or younger has no experience with inflation other than maybe from an Econ 101 textbook. Obviously that could be a problem.\nAs an aside I remember President Ford in 1974 trying to jawbone inflation down with his \"Whip Inflation Now\" campaign, which featured“Win” buttons,earringsand evenugly sweaters.None of this worked and it took draconian measures by Fed Chair Paul Volcker (raising rates and targeting money supply,as described by Former President of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, William Poole)to eventually tame inflation and keep it under wraps for all those years.\nUntil now perhaps. Last week theLabor Department reported that consumer prices (the CPI, or consumer price index) rose 5% in May,the fastest annual rate in nearly 13 years—which was when the economy was overheating from the housing boom which subsequently went bust and sent the economy off a cliff and into the Great Recession. Core inflation, which excludes volatile food and energy prices, was up 3.8%, the biggest increase since May 1992. (For the record, the likelihood of the economy tanking right now is de minimis.)\n\nUsed car and truck prices are a major driver of inflation, climbing 7.3% last month and 29.7% over the past year. New car prices are up too, which have pushed upshares of Ford and GM a remarkable 40% plus this year.Clearly Americans want to buy vehicles to go on vacation and get back to work. And Yahoo Finance’sJanna Herron reportsthat rents are rising at their fastest pace in 15 years.\nTo be sure, not all prices are climbing.As Yahoo Finance’s Rick Newman points out,prices are not up much at all for health care, education and are basically flat for technology, including computers, smartphones and internet service (an important point which we’ll get back to.)\nBut that’s the counterpoint really. Americans are obsessed with cars, housing is critical and many of us are experiencing sticker shock booking travel this summer. Higher prices are front and center. Wall Street too is in a tizzy about inflation, and concerns about it and more importantly Federal Reserve policy in response to inflation (see below), sent stocks lower with the S&P 500 down 1.91% this week, its worst week since February.\nGiven this backdrop, the tension (such as it is) was high when the Fed met this week to deliver its forecast and for Chair Jay Powell to answer questions from the media. Or at least so said hedge fund honcho Paul Tudor Jones,who characterized the proceedings on CNBCas “the most important meeting in [Chairman] Jay Powell’s career, certainly the most important Fed meeting of the past four or five years.” Jones was critical of the Fed, which he believes is now stimulating the economy unnecessarily by keeping interest rates low and by buying financial assets. Unnecessarily, Jones says, because the economy is already running hot and needs no support. The Fed (which is in the transitory camp when it comes to inflation) risks overheating the economy by creating runaway inflation, according to PTJ.\nNow I don’t see eye to eye with Jones on this, though I should point out, he's a billionaire from investing in financial markets, and let’s just say I’m not. I should also point out that Jones, 66, is in fact old enough to remember inflation, never mind that as a young man he called the 1987 stock market crash. So we should all ignore Jones at our peril.\nAs for what the Fed put forth this past Wednesday, well it wasn’t much, signaling an expectation ofraising interest rates twice by the end of 2023(yes, that is down the road.) And Powell, who’s become much more adept at not rippling the waters these days after some rougher forays earlier in his tenure, didn’t drop any bombshells in the presser.\nWhich brings us to the question of why the Federal Reserve isn’t so concerned about inflation and thinks it is mostly—here’s that word again—transitory. To answer that, we need to first address why prices are rising right now, which can be summed up in one very familiar abbreviation: COVID-19. When COVID hit last spring the economy collapsed, which crushed demand in sectors like leisure, travel and retail. Now the economy is roaring back to life and businesses can raise prices, certainly over 2020 levels.\n“We clearly should’ve expected it,” says William Spriggs, chief economist at the AFL-CIO and a professor of economics at Howard University. “You can’t shut down the economy and think you turn on the switch [without some inflation].”\n“We had a pandemic that forced an artificial shutdown of the economy in a way that even the collapse of the financial system and the housing market didn’t, and we had a snapback at a rate we’ve never seen before—not because of the fundamentals driving recovery but because of government,” says Joel Naroff, president and chief economist of Naroff Economics.\nCOVID had other secondary effects on the economy though, besides just ultimately producing a snapback. For one thing, the pandemic throttled supply chains, specifically the shipping of parts and components from one part of the globe to another. It also confused managers about how much to produce and therefore how many parts to order.\nA prime example here is what happened to the chip (semiconductor) and auto industrieswhich I wrote about last month.Car makers thought no one would buy vehicles during the pandemic and pared back their orders with chipmakers, (which were having a tough time shipping their chips anyway.) Turned out the car guys were wrong, millions of people wanted cars and trucks, but the automakers didn’t have enough chips for their cars and had to curb production. Fewer vehicles and strong demand led to higher new car prices, which cascaded to used car prices then to car rental rates. Net net, all the friction and slowness of getting things delivered now adds to costs which causes companies to raise prices.\nAnother secondary effect of COVID which has been inflationary comes from employment,which I got into a bit last week.We all know millions were thrown out of work by COVID last year, many of whom were backstopped by government payments that could add up to $600 a week (state and federal.) These folks have been none too keen on coming back to work for minimum wage, or $290 a week. So to lure them back employers are having to pay more, which puts more money in people's pockets which allows stores for example to raise prices.\nAnti-inflation forces\nBut here’s the big-time question: If COVID was temporary, and therefore its effects are temporary and inflation is one of its effects then doesn’t it follow, ipso facto, that inflation is (OK I’ll say it again), transitory?\nI say yes, (with a bit of a caveat.) And most economists, like Claudia Sahm, a senior fellow at the Jain Family Institute and a former Federal Reserve economist, agree. “‘Transitory’ has become a buzzword,” she says. “It is important to be more concrete about what we mean by that. We’re probably going to see in the next few months inflation numbers that are bigger than average, but as long as they keep stepping down, that’s the sign of it being transitory. If we didn’t see any sign of inflation stepping down some, it would’ve started feeling like ‘Houston, we have a problem.’”\nTo buttress my argument beyond that above \"if-then\" syllogism, let’s take a look at why inflation has been so low for the past three decades.\nTo me this is mostly obvious. Prices have been tamped down by the greatest anti-inflation force of our lifetime, that being technology, specifically the explosion of consumer technology. Think about it. The first wave of technology, a good example would be IBM mainframes, saved big companies money in back-office functions, savings which they mostly kept for themselves (higher profits) and their shareholders. But the four great landmark events in the advent of consumer technology; the introduction ofthe PC in 1974 (MITS Altair),the Netscape IPO of 1995,Google search in 1998,and the launch of theiPhone in 2007(I remember Steve Jobs demoing it to me like it was yesterday), greatly accelerated, broadened and deepened this deflationary trend.\nNot only has technology been pushing down the cost of everything from drilling for oil, to manufacturing clothes to farming, and allowing for the creation of groundbreaking (and deflationary) competitors like Uber, Airbnb and Netflix, but it also let consumers find—on their phones—the most affordable trip to Hawaii, the least expensive haircut or the best deal on Nikes.\nSo technology has reduced the cost of almost everything and will continue to do so the rest of our lifetime. Bottom line: Unless something terrible happens, the power of technology will outweigh and outlive COVID.\nThere is one mitigating factor and that is globalism, which is connected to both technology and COVID. Let me briefly explain.\nAfter World War II, most of humanity has become more and more connected in terms of trade, communication, travel, etc. (See supply chain above.) Technology of course was a major enabler here; better ships, planes and faster internet, all of which as it grew more potent, accelerated globalism. Another element was the introduction of political constructs like the World Trade Organization and NAFTA. (I think of the Clinton administration andChina joining the WTO in 2001as perhaps the high-water marks of globalization.)\nLike its technological cousin, globalism has deflationary effects particularly on the labor front as companies could more and more easily find lowest cost countries to produce goods and source materials. And like technology, globalization seemed inexorable, which it was, until it wasn’t. Political winds, manifested by the likes of Brexit and leaders like Putin, Xi Jinping, Erdogan, Bolsonaro, Duterte and of course Donald Trump have caused globalism to wane and anti-globalism and nationalism to wax.\nThe internet too, once seen as only a great connector, has also become a global divider, as the world increasingly fractures into Chinese, U.S. and European walled digital zones when it comes to social media and search for example. Security risks, privacy, spying and hacking of course divide us further here too.\nSo technology, which had made globalism stronger and stronger, now also makes it weaker and weaker.\nCOVID plays a role in rethinking globalism as it exposes vulnerabilities in the supply chain. Companies that were rethinking their manufacturing in China but considering another country, are now wondering if it just makes sense to repatriate the whole shebang. Supply chains that were optimized for cost only are being rethought with security and reliability being factored in and that costs money.\nHow significant is this decline in globalization and how permanent is it? Good questions. But my point here is whether or not \"globalism disrupted\" is transitory (!) or not, it could push prices up, (in the short and intermediate run at least), as cost is sacrificed for predictability. Longer term I say Americans are a resourceful people. We’ll figure out how to make cost effective stuff in the U.S. It’s also likely that globalism will trend upward again, though perhaps not as unfettered as it once was.\nMore downward pressure on pricing could come from shifts in employment practices. Mark Zandi points out that “the work-from-anywhere dynamic could depress wage growth and prices. If I don’t need to work in New York anymore and could live in Tampa, it stands to reason my wage could get cut or I won’t get the same wage increase in the future.”\nAnd so what is Zandi’s take on transitory? “What we’re observing now is prices going back to pre-pandemic,” he says. “The price spikes we’re experiencing now will continue for the next few months through summer but certainly by the end of year, this time next year, they will have disappeared. I do think underlying inflation will be higher post-pandemic than pre-pandemic, but that’s a feature not a bug.”\nI don’t disagree. To me it’s simple: The technology wave I’ve described above is bigger than COVID and bigger than the rise and fall of globalism. And that is why, ladies and gentlemen, I believe inflation will be transitory, certainly in the long run. (Though I’m well aware of whatJohn Maynard Keynes said about the long run.)","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":730,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[{"author":{"id":"3581761553455766","authorId":"3581761553455766","name":"SunnyBoyz","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/08065fda7a858dc38bec2e41d6acaf71","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3581761553455766","authorIdStr":"3581761553455766"},"content":"Done, pls also help me to comment and like my first post from my profile, thanks","text":"Done, pls also help me to comment and like my first post from my profile, thanks","html":"Done, pls also help me to comment and like my first post from my profile, thanks"}],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":186011904,"gmtCreate":1623464956708,"gmtModify":1704204365419,"author":{"id":"3557272953214384","authorId":"3557272953214384","name":"WGSsss","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c859daf551024a3f95b178c72e1b8354","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3557272953214384","authorIdStr":"3557272953214384"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Wow","listText":"Wow","text":"Wow","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/186011904","repostId":"2142120735","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2142120735","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1623454642,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2142120735?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-12 07:37","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Denmark has its own GameStop moment with 1,387% spike in Danish biotech firm shares","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2142120735","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"Orphazyme A/S says it has no idea why its American depositary shares surged overnight. ","content":"<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6ed30e8558b23ac9b494d0aca8d909fc\" tg-width=\"1200\" tg-height=\"675\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ORPH\">Orphazyme A/S</a> says it has no idea why its American depositary shares surged overnight.</p>\n<p>Danish investors and analysts spent the morning trying to figure out why a tiny biotechnology company suddenly soared almost 1,400% during US trading hours.</p>\n<p>Orphazyme A/S says it has no idea why its American depositary shares surged overnight. When trading started in Copenhagen, the Danish shares rose as much as 76%. The company has now warned investors against being sucked into the frenzy.</p>\n<p>“Investors who purchase the company’s ADS or shares may lose a significant portion of their investments if the price of such securities subsequently declines,” Orphazyme said on Friday morning.</p>\n<p>The only reasonable conclusion to be drawn is that Denmark now has its own meme stock, according to Per Hansen, an investment economist at retail broker Nordnet in Copenhagen. “It’s not just GameStop and AMC that are the subjects of strange, sudden and inexplicable” price developments, Hansen said in a client note.</p>\n<p>“Sometimes, there’s no logical explanation for what happens on the stock market,” he said. “And the development in the share price of Orphazyme is an example of that.” Orphazyme’s ADS soared as much as 1,387% during US hours, before closing about 302% higher.</p>\n<p>Orphazyme said it’s “not aware of any material change in its clinical development programs, financial condition or results of operations that would explain such price volatility or trading volume.”</p>\n<p>Investors in the company have been waiting for an important update on the application of an experimental treatment for Niemann-Pick disease. The drug, called arimoclomol, is under priority review with US authorities, who are due to provide feedback on June 17. But Orphazyme hasn’t provided any recent news on the review that might explain the share move.</p>\n<p>The US Securities and Exchange Commission said this week it’s scrutinizing markets for signs of manipulation as meme stocks continue to surge. That’s as trading in such stocks took off again this week, with chatter building on WallStreetBets and other social media platforms on the potential for short squeezes.</p>\n<p>Orphazyme, which uses heat shock proteins to develop therapies for rare neurodegenerative diseases, has had a turbulent time since its 2017 initial public offering. Shares in the company peaked in February 2020, trading 69% above the IPO price, but are now roughly a third down from the listing, even with Friday’s gains.</p>\n<p>A little more than two hours after trading started in Copenhagen on Friday, shares in Orphazyme were up about 45%, bringing its market value to roughly US$280 million ($370.8 million).</p>\n<p><i>Photo: Bloomberg</i></p>","source":"edge_highlight","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Denmark has its own GameStop moment with 1,387% spike in Danish biotech firm shares</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nDenmark has its own GameStop moment with 1,387% spike in Danish biotech firm shares\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-06-12 07:37 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.theedgesingapore.com/news/company-news/denmark-has-its-own-gamestop-moment-1387-spike-danish-biotech-firm-shares?utm_source=Blog&utm_medium=RSS&utm_campaign=Tiger_Brokers_app_RSS><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Orphazyme A/S says it has no idea why its American depositary shares surged overnight.\nDanish investors and analysts spent the morning trying to figure out why a tiny biotechnology company suddenly ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.theedgesingapore.com/news/company-news/denmark-has-its-own-gamestop-moment-1387-spike-danish-biotech-firm-shares?utm_source=Blog&utm_medium=RSS&utm_campaign=Tiger_Brokers_app_RSS\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"GME":"游戏驿站"},"source_url":"https://www.theedgesingapore.com/news/company-news/denmark-has-its-own-gamestop-moment-1387-spike-danish-biotech-firm-shares?utm_source=Blog&utm_medium=RSS&utm_campaign=Tiger_Brokers_app_RSS","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2142120735","content_text":"Orphazyme A/S says it has no idea why its American depositary shares surged overnight.\nDanish investors and analysts spent the morning trying to figure out why a tiny biotechnology company suddenly soared almost 1,400% during US trading hours.\nOrphazyme A/S says it has no idea why its American depositary shares surged overnight. When trading started in Copenhagen, the Danish shares rose as much as 76%. The company has now warned investors against being sucked into the frenzy.\n“Investors who purchase the company’s ADS or shares may lose a significant portion of their investments if the price of such securities subsequently declines,” Orphazyme said on Friday morning.\nThe only reasonable conclusion to be drawn is that Denmark now has its own meme stock, according to Per Hansen, an investment economist at retail broker Nordnet in Copenhagen. “It’s not just GameStop and AMC that are the subjects of strange, sudden and inexplicable” price developments, Hansen said in a client note.\n“Sometimes, there’s no logical explanation for what happens on the stock market,” he said. “And the development in the share price of Orphazyme is an example of that.” Orphazyme’s ADS soared as much as 1,387% during US hours, before closing about 302% higher.\nOrphazyme said it’s “not aware of any material change in its clinical development programs, financial condition or results of operations that would explain such price volatility or trading volume.”\nInvestors in the company have been waiting for an important update on the application of an experimental treatment for Niemann-Pick disease. The drug, called arimoclomol, is under priority review with US authorities, who are due to provide feedback on June 17. But Orphazyme hasn’t provided any recent news on the review that might explain the share move.\nThe US Securities and Exchange Commission said this week it’s scrutinizing markets for signs of manipulation as meme stocks continue to surge. That’s as trading in such stocks took off again this week, with chatter building on WallStreetBets and other social media platforms on the potential for short squeezes.\nOrphazyme, which uses heat shock proteins to develop therapies for rare neurodegenerative diseases, has had a turbulent time since its 2017 initial public offering. Shares in the company peaked in February 2020, trading 69% above the IPO price, but are now roughly a third down from the listing, even with Friday’s gains.\nA little more than two hours after trading started in Copenhagen on Friday, shares in Orphazyme were up about 45%, bringing its market value to roughly US$280 million ($370.8 million).\nPhoto: Bloomberg","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":395,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":188099029,"gmtCreate":1623415010561,"gmtModify":1704202971253,"author":{"id":"3557272953214384","authorId":"3557272953214384","name":"WGSsss","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c859daf551024a3f95b178c72e1b8354","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3557272953214384","authorIdStr":"3557272953214384"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/188099029","repostId":"2142022769","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2142022769","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1623380100,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2142022769?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-11 10:55","market":"us","language":"en","title":"We put 6 more meme stocks' numbers to the test and the differences are telling","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2142022769","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"Digging deeper into the the meme stock phenomenon, there are big difference between Palantir, Wendy's, Canoo and other companies.The world of meme stocks is changing every day as traders communicating through Reddit's WallStreetBets channel and other social media set their sights on new targets for short squeezes or find other downtrodden companies to bid up in price.After last week's look at financial results and projections for the four BANG stocks and four other meme companies, what follows i","content":"<blockquote>\n <b>Digging deeper into the the meme stock phenomenon, there are big difference between Palantir, Wendy's, Canoo and other companies.</b>\n</blockquote>\n<p>The world of meme stocks is changing every day as traders communicating through Reddit's WallStreetBets channel and other social media set their sights on new targets for short squeezes or find other downtrodden companies to bid up in price.</p>\n<p>After last week's look at financial results and projections for the four BANG stocks and four other meme companies, what follows is the same treatment for six more.</p>\n<p>(The BANG stocks are BlackBerry Ltd. (BB.T), AMC Entertainment Holdings Inc <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMC\">$(AMC)$</a>, Nokia Corp. (NOKIA.HE) and GameStop Corp. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GME\">$(GME)$</a>.)</p>\n<p><b>Short squeezes and meme stocks</b></p>\n<p>Traders looking to group together on social media to make quick killings by pushing up share prices of companies at early stages or those going through difficult times have been setting up short squeezes.</p>\n<p>Professional investors have traditionally short-sold shares of companies they believe will perform worse than most other investors or analysts expect. Shorting means borrowing a company's shares and selling them immediately, in the hope of buying them back at a lower price, returning them to the lender and pocketing the difference. If you simply buy a stock hoping it will go up, all you risk is the money you invest. You might get wiped out. But if you short a stock, your risk potential is unlimited. You never know how high the price might rise if you have gotten the trade wrong.</p>\n<p>\"Covering\" a short position is when you buy back the shares to return them to the investor who lent them to you. You are hoping to cover at a lower price than you sold the shares for, to make a profit.</p>\n<p>To have a short position, you need to have a margin account with a broker -- an account that lets you borrow to invest or trade. Because of the risk in taking a short position, if the share price goes against you (higher), your broker will keep increasing its collateral requirements. If you run out of cash as the price keeps rising, you will be forced to cover at a loss. That type of action among a large group of short-sellers pushes the price higher in a spiral -- a short squeeze.</p>\n<p><b>Six more meme stocks</b></p>\n<p>The action changes daily. On June 9, for example, shares of Clover Health Investments Corp. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CLOV\">$(CLOV)$</a> fell 24% after rising 86% the day before. The stock is 36.6% sold short, according to FactSet.</p>\n<p>Read:Newest meme stock darling Clover Health is popping. Is the SEC watching?</p>\n<p>Here are the six additional meme stocks, following our initial group of eight , sorted by market capitalization as of the close on June 9:</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/45b4fabbee4e18ee1b473200ab3a7c4b\" tg-width=\"1260\" tg-height=\"300\"></p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PLTR\">Palantir Technologies Inc.</a> (PLTR) provides a software platform used by government defense and intelligence agencies. It is the largest company on the list by market cap, but not by revenue, as you can see below. A year-to-date chart of its price performance shows how wild the meme-stock action can be:</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1d9a8e2dfc61b0e4ff70a8630193cecb\" tg-width=\"1259\" tg-height=\"1038\"></p>\n<p>Palantir's stock was up 3% for 2021 through June 9, but its market cap had increased by 26% because the company had been raising cash by selling additional shares to investors. The company's following as a meme stock seems to spring more from its growth prospects than from short interest, which peaked at 8.5% of shares available for sale, according to FactSet.</p>\n<p>Wendy's Co. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/WEN\">$(WEN)$</a> is another meme stock whose addition to the group may be a bit confusing, as the stock isn't heavily shorted and the company is stable. Thornton McEnery dug into the action on June 8, which may have included confusion over Wendy's ticker symbol , when the stock rose 26%.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/WISH\">ContextLogic Inc.</a> (WISH) is <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE\">one</a> of two stocks on the new list that have fallen this year. The mobile e-commerce company's stock opened below its initial public offering price before the IPO.</p>\n<p><b>Short interest</b></p>\n<p>Keeping the group in the same order, here are levels of short interest as percentages of available shares and in dollars:</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d0875b54168c760b950d250308eb5efd\" tg-width=\"1260\" tg-height=\"390\"></p>\n<p>FactSet's data on short positions as a percentage of shares outstanding is updated twice a month. The data was updated overnight between June 9 and 10. The second update takes place around the 25th day of the month.</p>\n<p>Clover is the most heavily shorted stock on the list. Brad Lamensdorf, CEO of ActiveAlts in Westport, Conn., who runs long and short investment strategies, said previously that a short percentage \"over 30% to 40% is outrageously high.\" (Lamensdorf co-manages the AdvisorShares <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/HDGE\">Ranger Equity Bear ETF</a> (HDGE), which is meant to be used as a hedging tool.)</p>\n<p>A high percentage of shares sold short makes a stock especially dangerous for the short-sellers, because it can increase the intensity of any short squeeze.</p>\n<p>We have shown the short interest as a percentage of market cap in order to provide context. Tesla Inc. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">$(TSLA)$</a> is an excellent example to provide more context, because the company has such a large market capitalization of $576.8 billion. Only 5.16% of the shares are sold short, but that comes to $29.8 billion in short interest -- the most (in dollars) for any stock in the S&amp;P 500. Amazon.com Inc. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMZN\">$(AMZN)$</a> ranks second for dollars of short interest in the benchmark index, with 1.09% of shares sold short, which comes to $18.1 billion in short interest for a company with a market cap of $1.66 trillion.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GOEV\">Canoo Inc.</a> (GOEV) is the second-most heavily shorted stock listed above, at 29.5%. The electric-vehicle maker was formed on Dec. 21 through the merger of Canoo Holdings Ltd. and Hennessy Capital Acquisition Corp. IV, a special purpose acquisition company, or SPAC. Canoo expects to produce its first vehicle in mid-2022 in limited quantities, with \"serial production launching in 2023,\" according to its 10-K report filed on March 31.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CLNE\">Clean Energy Fuels Corp</a>. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CLNE.AU\">$(CLNE.AU)$</a> provides natural gas for use as an alternative to gasoline or diesel for fleets of vehicles. The stock is 6.58% sold-short, but has had a good run this year as the energy sector has recovered.</p>\n<p><b>Fundamentals</b></p>\n<p>We'll look back at sales results for this group of six meme stocks and then look ahead at sales estimates through 2023.</p>\n<ul>\n <li><b>Looking back</b></li>\n</ul>\n<p>First, here's a comparison of annual sales, in millions of dollars for the past five reported fiscal years (where available):</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bcc4fbd762406f0684e991d289b8b760\" tg-width=\"1260\" tg-height=\"392\"></p>\n<p>You can see clear growth paths in recent years for Palantir, Wendy's and ContextLogic, while Clean Energy Fuels had understandable challenges from lower natural gas prices in 2020.</p>\n<p>Clover was incorporated on Oct. 18, 2019. It hasn't yet reported annual revenue. For the first quarter, the company reported $200.3 million in sales, up from $165.5 million in the first quarter of 2020. Clover merged with <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/IPOC.U\">Social Capital Hedosophia Holdings Corp. III</a> (a SPAC) on Jan. 7.</p>\n<ul>\n <li><b>Looking ahead -- sales</b></li>\n</ul>\n<p>Starting from a baseline of calendar 2021, here are sales estimates going out through 2023 among Wall Street analysts polled by FactSet:</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/37c11916067fb3829caff57a89cf17f0\" tg-width=\"1260\" tg-height=\"380\"></p>\n<p>Double-digit or better sales growth is expected for all of the companies over the next two years except Wendy's. Price-to-sale ratios, based on closing share prices on June 9 and the 2023 estimates, are included. In comparison, the S&amp;P 500 trades for 2.5 times its weighted aggregate consensus sales estimate for 2023.</p>\n<p><b>Looking ahead -- earnings</b></p>\n<p>Here are earnings-per-share estimates going out to 2023:</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4cf06aa00f9303dda82b1c3f8cf34c21\" tg-width=\"1260\" tg-height=\"500\"></p>\n<p>You might not have expected the EPS projections to be particularly useful, but they underscore how high these stocks are trading. The S&amp;P 500 trades for 18.4 times its consensus EPS estimate for 2023.</p>\n<p>The estimates show expected improvement for Palantir, if it manages to maintain its rapid sales growth. Wendy's is expected to improve EPS significantly even with modest sale growth, in part because of stock buybacks .</p>\n<p><b>Wall Street's opinion</b></p>\n<p>Here's a summary of opinion for this group of meme stocks among Wall Street analysts:</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c2dfa61b27c34a6c17f5b4d2119126f9\" tg-width=\"1259\" tg-height=\"373\"></p>\n<p>So the Wall Street analysts have the most love for ContextLogic, with 82% \"buy\" or equivalent ratings. Second place goes to Clean Energy Fuels. For that company, the timing, in a year of economic and fuel-price recovery, not to mention the desire among many investors to help lower carbon emissions, seems perfect.</p>\n<p>Wall Street is skeptical of Palantir and Clover Health, but it would seem for different reasons, as Palantir already has a history of rapid sales growth.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>We put 6 more meme stocks' numbers to the test and the differences are telling</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWe put 6 more meme stocks' numbers to the test and the differences are telling\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-06-11 10:55</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<blockquote>\n <b>Digging deeper into the the meme stock phenomenon, there are big difference between Palantir, Wendy's, Canoo and other companies.</b>\n</blockquote>\n<p>The world of meme stocks is changing every day as traders communicating through Reddit's WallStreetBets channel and other social media set their sights on new targets for short squeezes or find other downtrodden companies to bid up in price.</p>\n<p>After last week's look at financial results and projections for the four BANG stocks and four other meme companies, what follows is the same treatment for six more.</p>\n<p>(The BANG stocks are BlackBerry Ltd. (BB.T), AMC Entertainment Holdings Inc <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMC\">$(AMC)$</a>, Nokia Corp. (NOKIA.HE) and GameStop Corp. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GME\">$(GME)$</a>.)</p>\n<p><b>Short squeezes and meme stocks</b></p>\n<p>Traders looking to group together on social media to make quick killings by pushing up share prices of companies at early stages or those going through difficult times have been setting up short squeezes.</p>\n<p>Professional investors have traditionally short-sold shares of companies they believe will perform worse than most other investors or analysts expect. Shorting means borrowing a company's shares and selling them immediately, in the hope of buying them back at a lower price, returning them to the lender and pocketing the difference. If you simply buy a stock hoping it will go up, all you risk is the money you invest. You might get wiped out. But if you short a stock, your risk potential is unlimited. You never know how high the price might rise if you have gotten the trade wrong.</p>\n<p>\"Covering\" a short position is when you buy back the shares to return them to the investor who lent them to you. You are hoping to cover at a lower price than you sold the shares for, to make a profit.</p>\n<p>To have a short position, you need to have a margin account with a broker -- an account that lets you borrow to invest or trade. Because of the risk in taking a short position, if the share price goes against you (higher), your broker will keep increasing its collateral requirements. If you run out of cash as the price keeps rising, you will be forced to cover at a loss. That type of action among a large group of short-sellers pushes the price higher in a spiral -- a short squeeze.</p>\n<p><b>Six more meme stocks</b></p>\n<p>The action changes daily. On June 9, for example, shares of Clover Health Investments Corp. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CLOV\">$(CLOV)$</a> fell 24% after rising 86% the day before. The stock is 36.6% sold short, according to FactSet.</p>\n<p>Read:Newest meme stock darling Clover Health is popping. Is the SEC watching?</p>\n<p>Here are the six additional meme stocks, following our initial group of eight , sorted by market capitalization as of the close on June 9:</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/45b4fabbee4e18ee1b473200ab3a7c4b\" tg-width=\"1260\" tg-height=\"300\"></p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PLTR\">Palantir Technologies Inc.</a> (PLTR) provides a software platform used by government defense and intelligence agencies. It is the largest company on the list by market cap, but not by revenue, as you can see below. A year-to-date chart of its price performance shows how wild the meme-stock action can be:</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1d9a8e2dfc61b0e4ff70a8630193cecb\" tg-width=\"1259\" tg-height=\"1038\"></p>\n<p>Palantir's stock was up 3% for 2021 through June 9, but its market cap had increased by 26% because the company had been raising cash by selling additional shares to investors. The company's following as a meme stock seems to spring more from its growth prospects than from short interest, which peaked at 8.5% of shares available for sale, according to FactSet.</p>\n<p>Wendy's Co. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/WEN\">$(WEN)$</a> is another meme stock whose addition to the group may be a bit confusing, as the stock isn't heavily shorted and the company is stable. Thornton McEnery dug into the action on June 8, which may have included confusion over Wendy's ticker symbol , when the stock rose 26%.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/WISH\">ContextLogic Inc.</a> (WISH) is <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE\">one</a> of two stocks on the new list that have fallen this year. The mobile e-commerce company's stock opened below its initial public offering price before the IPO.</p>\n<p><b>Short interest</b></p>\n<p>Keeping the group in the same order, here are levels of short interest as percentages of available shares and in dollars:</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d0875b54168c760b950d250308eb5efd\" tg-width=\"1260\" tg-height=\"390\"></p>\n<p>FactSet's data on short positions as a percentage of shares outstanding is updated twice a month. The data was updated overnight between June 9 and 10. The second update takes place around the 25th day of the month.</p>\n<p>Clover is the most heavily shorted stock on the list. Brad Lamensdorf, CEO of ActiveAlts in Westport, Conn., who runs long and short investment strategies, said previously that a short percentage \"over 30% to 40% is outrageously high.\" (Lamensdorf co-manages the AdvisorShares <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/HDGE\">Ranger Equity Bear ETF</a> (HDGE), which is meant to be used as a hedging tool.)</p>\n<p>A high percentage of shares sold short makes a stock especially dangerous for the short-sellers, because it can increase the intensity of any short squeeze.</p>\n<p>We have shown the short interest as a percentage of market cap in order to provide context. Tesla Inc. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">$(TSLA)$</a> is an excellent example to provide more context, because the company has such a large market capitalization of $576.8 billion. Only 5.16% of the shares are sold short, but that comes to $29.8 billion in short interest -- the most (in dollars) for any stock in the S&amp;P 500. Amazon.com Inc. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMZN\">$(AMZN)$</a> ranks second for dollars of short interest in the benchmark index, with 1.09% of shares sold short, which comes to $18.1 billion in short interest for a company with a market cap of $1.66 trillion.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GOEV\">Canoo Inc.</a> (GOEV) is the second-most heavily shorted stock listed above, at 29.5%. The electric-vehicle maker was formed on Dec. 21 through the merger of Canoo Holdings Ltd. and Hennessy Capital Acquisition Corp. IV, a special purpose acquisition company, or SPAC. Canoo expects to produce its first vehicle in mid-2022 in limited quantities, with \"serial production launching in 2023,\" according to its 10-K report filed on March 31.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CLNE\">Clean Energy Fuels Corp</a>. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CLNE.AU\">$(CLNE.AU)$</a> provides natural gas for use as an alternative to gasoline or diesel for fleets of vehicles. The stock is 6.58% sold-short, but has had a good run this year as the energy sector has recovered.</p>\n<p><b>Fundamentals</b></p>\n<p>We'll look back at sales results for this group of six meme stocks and then look ahead at sales estimates through 2023.</p>\n<ul>\n <li><b>Looking back</b></li>\n</ul>\n<p>First, here's a comparison of annual sales, in millions of dollars for the past five reported fiscal years (where available):</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bcc4fbd762406f0684e991d289b8b760\" tg-width=\"1260\" tg-height=\"392\"></p>\n<p>You can see clear growth paths in recent years for Palantir, Wendy's and ContextLogic, while Clean Energy Fuels had understandable challenges from lower natural gas prices in 2020.</p>\n<p>Clover was incorporated on Oct. 18, 2019. It hasn't yet reported annual revenue. For the first quarter, the company reported $200.3 million in sales, up from $165.5 million in the first quarter of 2020. Clover merged with <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/IPOC.U\">Social Capital Hedosophia Holdings Corp. III</a> (a SPAC) on Jan. 7.</p>\n<ul>\n <li><b>Looking ahead -- sales</b></li>\n</ul>\n<p>Starting from a baseline of calendar 2021, here are sales estimates going out through 2023 among Wall Street analysts polled by FactSet:</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/37c11916067fb3829caff57a89cf17f0\" tg-width=\"1260\" tg-height=\"380\"></p>\n<p>Double-digit or better sales growth is expected for all of the companies over the next two years except Wendy's. Price-to-sale ratios, based on closing share prices on June 9 and the 2023 estimates, are included. In comparison, the S&amp;P 500 trades for 2.5 times its weighted aggregate consensus sales estimate for 2023.</p>\n<p><b>Looking ahead -- earnings</b></p>\n<p>Here are earnings-per-share estimates going out to 2023:</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4cf06aa00f9303dda82b1c3f8cf34c21\" tg-width=\"1260\" tg-height=\"500\"></p>\n<p>You might not have expected the EPS projections to be particularly useful, but they underscore how high these stocks are trading. The S&amp;P 500 trades for 18.4 times its consensus EPS estimate for 2023.</p>\n<p>The estimates show expected improvement for Palantir, if it manages to maintain its rapid sales growth. Wendy's is expected to improve EPS significantly even with modest sale growth, in part because of stock buybacks .</p>\n<p><b>Wall Street's opinion</b></p>\n<p>Here's a summary of opinion for this group of meme stocks among Wall Street analysts:</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c2dfa61b27c34a6c17f5b4d2119126f9\" tg-width=\"1259\" tg-height=\"373\"></p>\n<p>So the Wall Street analysts have the most love for ContextLogic, with 82% \"buy\" or equivalent ratings. Second place goes to Clean Energy Fuels. For that company, the timing, in a year of economic and fuel-price recovery, not to mention the desire among many investors to help lower carbon emissions, seems perfect.</p>\n<p>Wall Street is skeptical of Palantir and Clover Health, but it would seem for different reasons, as Palantir already has a history of rapid sales growth.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"WEN":"温蒂汉堡","PLTR":"Palantir Technologies Inc.","CLNE":"Clean Energy Fuels Corp","CLOV":"Clover Health Corp"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2142022769","content_text":"Digging deeper into the the meme stock phenomenon, there are big difference between Palantir, Wendy's, Canoo and other companies.\n\nThe world of meme stocks is changing every day as traders communicating through Reddit's WallStreetBets channel and other social media set their sights on new targets for short squeezes or find other downtrodden companies to bid up in price.\nAfter last week's look at financial results and projections for the four BANG stocks and four other meme companies, what follows is the same treatment for six more.\n(The BANG stocks are BlackBerry Ltd. (BB.T), AMC Entertainment Holdings Inc $(AMC)$, Nokia Corp. (NOKIA.HE) and GameStop Corp. $(GME)$.)\nShort squeezes and meme stocks\nTraders looking to group together on social media to make quick killings by pushing up share prices of companies at early stages or those going through difficult times have been setting up short squeezes.\nProfessional investors have traditionally short-sold shares of companies they believe will perform worse than most other investors or analysts expect. Shorting means borrowing a company's shares and selling them immediately, in the hope of buying them back at a lower price, returning them to the lender and pocketing the difference. If you simply buy a stock hoping it will go up, all you risk is the money you invest. You might get wiped out. But if you short a stock, your risk potential is unlimited. You never know how high the price might rise if you have gotten the trade wrong.\n\"Covering\" a short position is when you buy back the shares to return them to the investor who lent them to you. You are hoping to cover at a lower price than you sold the shares for, to make a profit.\nTo have a short position, you need to have a margin account with a broker -- an account that lets you borrow to invest or trade. Because of the risk in taking a short position, if the share price goes against you (higher), your broker will keep increasing its collateral requirements. If you run out of cash as the price keeps rising, you will be forced to cover at a loss. That type of action among a large group of short-sellers pushes the price higher in a spiral -- a short squeeze.\nSix more meme stocks\nThe action changes daily. On June 9, for example, shares of Clover Health Investments Corp. $(CLOV)$ fell 24% after rising 86% the day before. The stock is 36.6% sold short, according to FactSet.\nRead:Newest meme stock darling Clover Health is popping. Is the SEC watching?\nHere are the six additional meme stocks, following our initial group of eight , sorted by market capitalization as of the close on June 9:\n\nPalantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) provides a software platform used by government defense and intelligence agencies. It is the largest company on the list by market cap, but not by revenue, as you can see below. A year-to-date chart of its price performance shows how wild the meme-stock action can be:\n\nPalantir's stock was up 3% for 2021 through June 9, but its market cap had increased by 26% because the company had been raising cash by selling additional shares to investors. The company's following as a meme stock seems to spring more from its growth prospects than from short interest, which peaked at 8.5% of shares available for sale, according to FactSet.\nWendy's Co. $(WEN)$ is another meme stock whose addition to the group may be a bit confusing, as the stock isn't heavily shorted and the company is stable. Thornton McEnery dug into the action on June 8, which may have included confusion over Wendy's ticker symbol , when the stock rose 26%.\nContextLogic Inc. (WISH) is one of two stocks on the new list that have fallen this year. The mobile e-commerce company's stock opened below its initial public offering price before the IPO.\nShort interest\nKeeping the group in the same order, here are levels of short interest as percentages of available shares and in dollars:\n\nFactSet's data on short positions as a percentage of shares outstanding is updated twice a month. The data was updated overnight between June 9 and 10. The second update takes place around the 25th day of the month.\nClover is the most heavily shorted stock on the list. Brad Lamensdorf, CEO of ActiveAlts in Westport, Conn., who runs long and short investment strategies, said previously that a short percentage \"over 30% to 40% is outrageously high.\" (Lamensdorf co-manages the AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF (HDGE), which is meant to be used as a hedging tool.)\nA high percentage of shares sold short makes a stock especially dangerous for the short-sellers, because it can increase the intensity of any short squeeze.\nWe have shown the short interest as a percentage of market cap in order to provide context. Tesla Inc. $(TSLA)$ is an excellent example to provide more context, because the company has such a large market capitalization of $576.8 billion. Only 5.16% of the shares are sold short, but that comes to $29.8 billion in short interest -- the most (in dollars) for any stock in the S&P 500. Amazon.com Inc. $(AMZN)$ ranks second for dollars of short interest in the benchmark index, with 1.09% of shares sold short, which comes to $18.1 billion in short interest for a company with a market cap of $1.66 trillion.\nCanoo Inc. (GOEV) is the second-most heavily shorted stock listed above, at 29.5%. The electric-vehicle maker was formed on Dec. 21 through the merger of Canoo Holdings Ltd. and Hennessy Capital Acquisition Corp. IV, a special purpose acquisition company, or SPAC. Canoo expects to produce its first vehicle in mid-2022 in limited quantities, with \"serial production launching in 2023,\" according to its 10-K report filed on March 31.\nClean Energy Fuels Corp. $(CLNE.AU)$ provides natural gas for use as an alternative to gasoline or diesel for fleets of vehicles. The stock is 6.58% sold-short, but has had a good run this year as the energy sector has recovered.\nFundamentals\nWe'll look back at sales results for this group of six meme stocks and then look ahead at sales estimates through 2023.\n\nLooking back\n\nFirst, here's a comparison of annual sales, in millions of dollars for the past five reported fiscal years (where available):\n\nYou can see clear growth paths in recent years for Palantir, Wendy's and ContextLogic, while Clean Energy Fuels had understandable challenges from lower natural gas prices in 2020.\nClover was incorporated on Oct. 18, 2019. It hasn't yet reported annual revenue. For the first quarter, the company reported $200.3 million in sales, up from $165.5 million in the first quarter of 2020. Clover merged with Social Capital Hedosophia Holdings Corp. III (a SPAC) on Jan. 7.\n\nLooking ahead -- sales\n\nStarting from a baseline of calendar 2021, here are sales estimates going out through 2023 among Wall Street analysts polled by FactSet:\n\nDouble-digit or better sales growth is expected for all of the companies over the next two years except Wendy's. Price-to-sale ratios, based on closing share prices on June 9 and the 2023 estimates, are included. In comparison, the S&P 500 trades for 2.5 times its weighted aggregate consensus sales estimate for 2023.\nLooking ahead -- earnings\nHere are earnings-per-share estimates going out to 2023:\n\nYou might not have expected the EPS projections to be particularly useful, but they underscore how high these stocks are trading. The S&P 500 trades for 18.4 times its consensus EPS estimate for 2023.\nThe estimates show expected improvement for Palantir, if it manages to maintain its rapid sales growth. Wendy's is expected to improve EPS significantly even with modest sale growth, in part because of stock buybacks .\nWall Street's opinion\nHere's a summary of opinion for this group of meme stocks among Wall Street analysts:\n\nSo the Wall Street analysts have the most love for ContextLogic, with 82% \"buy\" or equivalent ratings. Second place goes to Clean Energy Fuels. For that company, the timing, in a year of economic and fuel-price recovery, not to mention the desire among many investors to help lower carbon emissions, seems perfect.\nWall Street is skeptical of Palantir and Clover Health, but it would seem for different reasons, as Palantir already has a history of rapid sales growth.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":561,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":135984309,"gmtCreate":1622126270201,"gmtModify":1704179992926,"author":{"id":"3557272953214384","authorId":"3557272953214384","name":"WGSsss","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c859daf551024a3f95b178c72e1b8354","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3557272953214384","authorIdStr":"3557272953214384"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/135984309","repostId":"1166192216","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1166192216","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1622125174,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1166192216?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-05-27 22:19","market":"us","language":"en","title":"BANKS ‘A small step’: Wall Street lukewarm on HSBC’s U.S. retail exit","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1166192216","media":"cnbc","summary":"LONDON —HSBC on Wednesday announced it wouldexit its loss-making U.S. retail banking operations, a m","content":"<div>\n<p>LONDON —HSBC on Wednesday announced it wouldexit its loss-making U.S. retail banking operations, a move that is being met with tepid applause by Wall Street analysts.Europe’s largest bank in terms of ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/05/27/a-small-step-wall-street-lukewarm-on-hsbcs-us-retail-exit.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"cnbc_highlight","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>BANKS ‘A small step’: Wall Street lukewarm on HSBC’s U.S. retail exit</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBANKS ‘A small step’: Wall Street lukewarm on HSBC’s U.S. retail exit\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-05-27 22:19 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.cnbc.com/2021/05/27/a-small-step-wall-street-lukewarm-on-hsbcs-us-retail-exit.html><strong>cnbc</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>LONDON —HSBC on Wednesday announced it wouldexit its loss-making U.S. retail banking operations, a move that is being met with tepid applause by Wall Street analysts.Europe’s largest bank in terms of ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/05/27/a-small-step-wall-street-lukewarm-on-hsbcs-us-retail-exit.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"HSBC":"汇丰"},"source_url":"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/05/27/a-small-step-wall-street-lukewarm-on-hsbcs-us-retail-exit.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/72bb72e1b84c09fca865c6dcb1bbcd16","article_id":"1166192216","content_text":"LONDON —HSBC on Wednesday announced it wouldexit its loss-making U.S. retail banking operations, a move that is being met with tepid applause by Wall Street analysts.Europe’s largest bank in terms of assets will sell off some parts of its mass-market business and wind down others as it looks to shift attention to its largest market — Asia.In a note Thursday,Goldman Sachsbanking analysts reiterated that HSBC's lack of scale in U.S. retail banking was the main reason for its low profitability and high cost-to-income ratio stateside.\"Thus, we see the announced measures as a positive, as they represent a small step towards HSBC potentially becoming a more focused, simpler and more profitable group,\" analysts Martin Leitgeb, Andreas Scheriau and Gurpreet Singh Sahi said.Having struggled against the big domestic players in the U.S. and some parts of Europe, the British lender has been seeking an exit from its less profitable operations for some time.Although letting go of most individual and small business clients, HSBC will maintain a small physical presence in the U.S. to serve its wealthiest international clients.The group will exit 90 of its 148 branches, pertaining a small network of 20-25 physical locations which will be recalibrated as international wealth centers, with the remaining branches to be closed.Goldman analysts noted that while the financial impacts arising from the transactions are immaterial in the wider group context and no additional details have yet been given on the profitability of U.S. wealth and personal banking operations post-exit, the outlook is more positive.\"We see scope for improved profitability, as the branch footprint will have been reduced by over 80%, whilst loans will only be down 13% (all else equal),\" they said, continuing with a \"buy\" rating on HSBC shares.The main downside risks Goldman highlighted included weaker macro trends such as pandemic setbacks, limited progress on the bank's restructuring, escalating geopolitical tensions, increased competition and \"delays in optimising capital efficiencies within the group.\"Citizens Bank and Cathay Bank, subsidiaries of Citizens Financial Group and Cathay General Corp., have agreed to buy HSBC's businesses on the east and west coasts, respectively.The deal would see a majority of HSBC's 850,000 client relationships sold, primarily customers with balances below $75,000, butBank of Americanoted that a 2% deposit premium on the sale is \"low compared with industry averages, reflecting the high cost structure of the operations.\"\"The remaining customers are small in number but the dominant part of U.S. retail deposit balances. The retained customer base is internationally active or aligned with HSBC's wealth management ambitions,\" BofA banking analysts Alastair Ryan and Rohith Chandra-Rajan said in a note Thursday.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":300,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":197956126,"gmtCreate":1621422474565,"gmtModify":1704357359480,"author":{"id":"3557272953214384","authorId":"3557272953214384","name":"WGSsss","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c859daf551024a3f95b178c72e1b8354","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3557272953214384","authorIdStr":"3557272953214384"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/197956126","repostId":"1101582299","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1101582299","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1621421466,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1101582299?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-05-19 18:51","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Lowe’s earnings beat on robust home improvement spending, but shares fall","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1101582299","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"KEY POINTS\n\nLowe’s reported Wednesday that consumers are continuing to invest in their homes in the ","content":"<p><b>KEY POINTS</b></p>\n<ul>\n <li>Lowe’s reported Wednesday that consumers are continuing to invest in their homes in the first quarter and it saw sales pick up among home professionals, such as contractors.</li>\n <li>The home improvement retailer said it’s tracking ahead of its previous forecast for sales of $86 billion this fiscal year.</li>\n <li>Shares fell early Wednesday, despite the retailer’s beating Wall Street’s expectations for first-quarter earnings.</li>\n</ul>\n<p>Lowe’s&nbsp;reported Wednesday that consumers are continuing to invest in their homes in the first quarter and it saw sales pick up among home professionals, such as contractors.</p>\n<p>Shares were down about 2% in premarket trading.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6372b7b8fca3df09929e659ebe690672\" tg-width=\"1302\" tg-height=\"663\"></p>\n<p>The home improvement retailer said momentum continued into May. Based on that consumer demand, it said it’s tracking ahead of its previous forecast for sales of $86 billion this fiscal year.</p>\n<p>Here’s what the company reported for the fiscal first quarter ended April 30 compared with what Wall Street was expecting, based on a survey of analysts by Refinitiv:</p>\n<ul>\n <li>Earnings per share: $3.21 vs. $2.62 expected</li>\n <li>Revenue: $24.42 billion vs. $23.86 billion expected</li>\n</ul>\n<p>Lowe’s reported first-quarter net income of$2.33 billion, or $3.21 per share, up from $1.34 billion, or $1.76 per share,a year earlier<b>.</b>The results outpaced the $2.62 per share expected by analysts surveyed by Refinitiv.</p>\n<p>Net sales rose to $24.42 billion from $19.68 billion last year, higher than analysts’ expectations of $23.86 billion.</p>\n<p>As of Tuesday’s close, Lowe’s shares have risen about 20% so far this year. Its shares closed at $192.75 on Tuesday, bringing its market value to $138.24 billion.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Lowe’s earnings beat on robust home improvement spending, but shares fall</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nLowe’s earnings beat on robust home improvement spending, but shares fall\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-05-19 18:51</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><b>KEY POINTS</b></p>\n<ul>\n <li>Lowe’s reported Wednesday that consumers are continuing to invest in their homes in the first quarter and it saw sales pick up among home professionals, such as contractors.</li>\n <li>The home improvement retailer said it’s tracking ahead of its previous forecast for sales of $86 billion this fiscal year.</li>\n <li>Shares fell early Wednesday, despite the retailer’s beating Wall Street’s expectations for first-quarter earnings.</li>\n</ul>\n<p>Lowe’s&nbsp;reported Wednesday that consumers are continuing to invest in their homes in the first quarter and it saw sales pick up among home professionals, such as contractors.</p>\n<p>Shares were down about 2% in premarket trading.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6372b7b8fca3df09929e659ebe690672\" tg-width=\"1302\" tg-height=\"663\"></p>\n<p>The home improvement retailer said momentum continued into May. Based on that consumer demand, it said it’s tracking ahead of its previous forecast for sales of $86 billion this fiscal year.</p>\n<p>Here’s what the company reported for the fiscal first quarter ended April 30 compared with what Wall Street was expecting, based on a survey of analysts by Refinitiv:</p>\n<ul>\n <li>Earnings per share: $3.21 vs. $2.62 expected</li>\n <li>Revenue: $24.42 billion vs. $23.86 billion expected</li>\n</ul>\n<p>Lowe’s reported first-quarter net income of$2.33 billion, or $3.21 per share, up from $1.34 billion, or $1.76 per share,a year earlier<b>.</b>The results outpaced the $2.62 per share expected by analysts surveyed by Refinitiv.</p>\n<p>Net sales rose to $24.42 billion from $19.68 billion last year, higher than analysts’ expectations of $23.86 billion.</p>\n<p>As of Tuesday’s close, Lowe’s shares have risen about 20% so far this year. Its shares closed at $192.75 on Tuesday, bringing its market value to $138.24 billion.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"LOW":"劳氏"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1101582299","content_text":"KEY POINTS\n\nLowe’s reported Wednesday that consumers are continuing to invest in their homes in the first quarter and it saw sales pick up among home professionals, such as contractors.\nThe home improvement retailer said it’s tracking ahead of its previous forecast for sales of $86 billion this fiscal year.\nShares fell early Wednesday, despite the retailer’s beating Wall Street’s expectations for first-quarter earnings.\n\nLowe’s reported Wednesday that consumers are continuing to invest in their homes in the first quarter and it saw sales pick up among home professionals, such as contractors.\nShares were down about 2% in premarket trading.\n\nThe home improvement retailer said momentum continued into May. Based on that consumer demand, it said it’s tracking ahead of its previous forecast for sales of $86 billion this fiscal year.\nHere’s what the company reported for the fiscal first quarter ended April 30 compared with what Wall Street was expecting, based on a survey of analysts by Refinitiv:\n\nEarnings per share: $3.21 vs. $2.62 expected\nRevenue: $24.42 billion vs. $23.86 billion expected\n\nLowe’s reported first-quarter net income of$2.33 billion, or $3.21 per share, up from $1.34 billion, or $1.76 per share,a year earlier.The results outpaced the $2.62 per share expected by analysts surveyed by Refinitiv.\nNet sales rose to $24.42 billion from $19.68 billion last year, higher than analysts’ expectations of $23.86 billion.\nAs of Tuesday’s close, Lowe’s shares have risen about 20% so far this year. Its shares closed at $192.75 on Tuesday, bringing its market value to $138.24 billion.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":514,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":194337714,"gmtCreate":1621341748038,"gmtModify":1704356066244,"author":{"id":"3557272953214384","authorId":"3557272953214384","name":"WGSsss","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c859daf551024a3f95b178c72e1b8354","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3557272953214384","authorIdStr":"3557272953214384"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Vghj","listText":"Vghj","text":"Vghj","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/194337714","repostId":"2136962447","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2136962447","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1621341581,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2136962447?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-05-18 20:39","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Fund managers position for ‘boom expectations’ with tech demand at three-year lows, Bank of America survey finds","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2136962447","media":"MarketWatch","summary":"Heavy earth-moving equipment being used by workers at a jade mine in Hpakant, in Myanmar's Kachin St","content":"<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7b68821d4ccdd01c8074a4b40d7f37a9\" tg-width=\"1260\" tg-height=\"839\"><span>Heavy earth-moving equipment being used by workers at a jade mine in Hpakant, in Myanmar's Kachin State on October 4, 2015.</span></p>\n<p>Fund managers are increasingly making a \"late cyclical\" push, according to a closely watched monthly survey released on Tuesday.</p>\n<p>The Bank of America global fund manager survey for May found that investors were increasingly positioned to what it called \"boom expectations\" -- with exposure to commodities, banks, materials, industrials, and U.K. and emerging market assets at highs relative to the last decade.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0dcad1ad710bfbc3f5ac06811c1c42ff\" tg-width=\"1260\" tg-height=\"1032\"></p>\n<p>That makes sense given their economic expectations, with 69% expecting both above-trend growth and inflation, a record high for the survey. Expectations for profits did slip by 6 percentage points, though at 78%, the percent who say global profits will improve over the next 12 months also is near record highs. Expectations for the first interest-rate hike from the Federal Reserve moved to November 2022 from January 2023.</p>\n<p>Investors report they are long U.K. stocks, where many of the world's leading miners including Glencore , BHP Group and Rio Tinto trade, for the first time since July 2012.</p>\n<p>Compared with April, though, investors also built up positions into consumer staples. Strategists at Bank of America say these investors are positioned for inflation with a hint of defensives. The percent overweight technology stocks were at 3-year lows.</p>\n<p>Inflation was identified as the top tail risk, and 43% said long bitcoin was the most crowded trade.</p>\n<p>The survey of 216 panelists with $625 billion in assets under management was conducted between May 7 and May 13.</p>\n<p>The S&amp;P 500 has gained 11% this year, while the tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite has advanced by 4%. The small-cap Russell 2000 has gained 13%.</p>","source":"lsy1603348471595","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Fund managers position for ‘boom expectations’ with tech demand at three-year lows, Bank of America survey finds</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFund managers position for ‘boom expectations’ with tech demand at three-year lows, Bank of America survey finds\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-05-18 20:39 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.marketwatch.com/story/fund-managers-position-for-boom-expectations-with-tech-demand-at-three-year-lows-bank-of-america-survey-finds-11621335033?mod=home-page><strong>MarketWatch</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Heavy earth-moving equipment being used by workers at a jade mine in Hpakant, in Myanmar's Kachin State on October 4, 2015.\nFund managers are increasingly making a \"late cyclical\" push, according to a...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/fund-managers-position-for-boom-expectations-with-tech-demand-at-three-year-lows-bank-of-america-survey-finds-11621335033?mod=home-page\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite","BAC":"美国银行",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/fund-managers-position-for-boom-expectations-with-tech-demand-at-three-year-lows-bank-of-america-survey-finds-11621335033?mod=home-page","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2136962447","content_text":"Heavy earth-moving equipment being used by workers at a jade mine in Hpakant, in Myanmar's Kachin State on October 4, 2015.\nFund managers are increasingly making a \"late cyclical\" push, according to a closely watched monthly survey released on Tuesday.\nThe Bank of America global fund manager survey for May found that investors were increasingly positioned to what it called \"boom expectations\" -- with exposure to commodities, banks, materials, industrials, and U.K. and emerging market assets at highs relative to the last decade.\n\nThat makes sense given their economic expectations, with 69% expecting both above-trend growth and inflation, a record high for the survey. Expectations for profits did slip by 6 percentage points, though at 78%, the percent who say global profits will improve over the next 12 months also is near record highs. Expectations for the first interest-rate hike from the Federal Reserve moved to November 2022 from January 2023.\nInvestors report they are long U.K. stocks, where many of the world's leading miners including Glencore , BHP Group and Rio Tinto trade, for the first time since July 2012.\nCompared with April, though, investors also built up positions into consumer staples. Strategists at Bank of America say these investors are positioned for inflation with a hint of defensives. The percent overweight technology stocks were at 3-year lows.\nInflation was identified as the top tail risk, and 43% said long bitcoin was the most crowded trade.\nThe survey of 216 panelists with $625 billion in assets under management was conducted between May 7 and May 13.\nThe S&P 500 has gained 11% this year, while the tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite has advanced by 4%. The small-cap Russell 2000 has gained 13%.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":374,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":196002307,"gmtCreate":1620997010009,"gmtModify":1704351706562,"author":{"id":"3557272953214384","authorId":"3557272953214384","name":"WGSsss","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c859daf551024a3f95b178c72e1b8354","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3557272953214384","authorIdStr":"3557272953214384"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Great","listText":"Great","text":"Great","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/196002307","repostId":"1114218364","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1114218364","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1620988115,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1114218364?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-05-14 18:28","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Will the Nasdaq's Recovery Last?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1114218364","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Some stocks remain under pressure even when financial results look solid.\n\nThe stock market managed ","content":"<blockquote>\n <b>Some stocks remain under pressure even when financial results look solid.</b>\n</blockquote>\n<p>The stock market managed to regain some of its lost ground on Thursday morning, but the<b>Nasdaq Composite</b>(NASDAQINDEX:^IXIC)wasn't able to deliver the confident bounce that many investors would've preferred to see. As of noon EDT, the Nasdaq was up just half a percent after having risen more than 1.5% earlier in the day. Investors ingrowth stocksappear reluctant to conclude that the volatility that the Nasdaq has endured recently has fully run its course, and that might be why gains faded toward midday.</p>\n<p>Part of the problem is that some smaller Nasdaq stocks continue to fall regardless of whether their financial reports are good or bad. Both<b>Bumble</b>(NASDAQ:BMBL)and<b>Poshmark</b>(NASDAQ:POSH)joined the list of companies that have issued their latest results, and both stocks were sharply lower even though each had some fundamental successes in their respective businesses.</p>\n<p><b>Bumble keeps buzzing</b></p>\n<p>Shares of Bumble dropped another 13%, hitting a new all-time low since coming public in February. The online dating specialist seemed to give investors a strong picture of its business, but shareholders didn't have a good first impression.</p>\n<p>Bumble has made substantial progressover the past year. Revenue climbed 43% from year-ago levels when you combine its predecessor entity's sales into the mix. Bumble had massive net income, but the strong-looking results stemmed from a favorable income tax benefit. Pre-tax losses widened 27% year over year.</p>\n<p>Bumble's operating metrics improved, with total paying users rising 30% to 2.8 million and a 13% rise in revenue per paying user to almost $20. However, investors seemed to focus on projections for full-year 2021 revenue of between $724 million and $734 million. That would imply a growth rate of just 25%, which is significantly slower than what many have hoped to see.</p>\n<p>The online dating industry has been highly lucrative, and that generated high expectations for Bumble. The company will have to work harder to meet those expectations in order for the share price to bounce back and generatenew buzz for Bumble.</p>\n<p><b>Can Poshmark get back in style?</b></p>\n<p>Elsewhere,shares of Poshmark lost 17%. The secondhand-style-based social marketplace continued to see its business gain momentum, but investors once again didn't have their high expectations met.</p>\n<p>Poshmark's numbers looked good. Gross merchandise value jumped 43% year over year to $441 million, leading to a 42% rise in revenue. Poshmark managed to post a modest adjusted operating profit, although it lost $0.33 per share due largely to various noncash expense items.</p>\n<p>Among the latest initiatives from Poshmark was a new category for pet owners trying to shop for their pets. The company expanded into Australia as part of its ongoing effort to boost its international exposure, and new in-listing video and seller shipping discount features helped to heighten the value of the Poshmark platform for sellers.</p>\n<p>Like Bumble, however, investors didn't seem satisfied with Poshmark's guidance. The company sees second-quarter revenue coming in flat to down slightly from first-quarter results. If that means customers might be losing their appetite for Poshmark's listings, it could spell further trouble for the already hard-hit stock.</p>\n<p><b>Keep your eyes on the Nasdaq</b></p>\n<p>In the long run, stocks perform in line with their underlying businesses. For the Nasdaq to recover, high expectations will need to get more realistic. As painful as this process is, it offers opportunities to those with confidence in companies with strong business models.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Will the Nasdaq's Recovery Last?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWill the Nasdaq's Recovery Last?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-05-14 18:28 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/05/13/will-the-nasdaqs-recovery-last/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Some stocks remain under pressure even when financial results look solid.\n\nThe stock market managed to regain some of its lost ground on Thursday morning, but theNasdaq Composite(NASDAQINDEX:^IXIC)...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/05/13/will-the-nasdaqs-recovery-last/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/05/13/will-the-nasdaqs-recovery-last/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1114218364","content_text":"Some stocks remain under pressure even when financial results look solid.\n\nThe stock market managed to regain some of its lost ground on Thursday morning, but theNasdaq Composite(NASDAQINDEX:^IXIC)wasn't able to deliver the confident bounce that many investors would've preferred to see. As of noon EDT, the Nasdaq was up just half a percent after having risen more than 1.5% earlier in the day. Investors ingrowth stocksappear reluctant to conclude that the volatility that the Nasdaq has endured recently has fully run its course, and that might be why gains faded toward midday.\nPart of the problem is that some smaller Nasdaq stocks continue to fall regardless of whether their financial reports are good or bad. BothBumble(NASDAQ:BMBL)andPoshmark(NASDAQ:POSH)joined the list of companies that have issued their latest results, and both stocks were sharply lower even though each had some fundamental successes in their respective businesses.\nBumble keeps buzzing\nShares of Bumble dropped another 13%, hitting a new all-time low since coming public in February. The online dating specialist seemed to give investors a strong picture of its business, but shareholders didn't have a good first impression.\nBumble has made substantial progressover the past year. Revenue climbed 43% from year-ago levels when you combine its predecessor entity's sales into the mix. Bumble had massive net income, but the strong-looking results stemmed from a favorable income tax benefit. Pre-tax losses widened 27% year over year.\nBumble's operating metrics improved, with total paying users rising 30% to 2.8 million and a 13% rise in revenue per paying user to almost $20. However, investors seemed to focus on projections for full-year 2021 revenue of between $724 million and $734 million. That would imply a growth rate of just 25%, which is significantly slower than what many have hoped to see.\nThe online dating industry has been highly lucrative, and that generated high expectations for Bumble. The company will have to work harder to meet those expectations in order for the share price to bounce back and generatenew buzz for Bumble.\nCan Poshmark get back in style?\nElsewhere,shares of Poshmark lost 17%. The secondhand-style-based social marketplace continued to see its business gain momentum, but investors once again didn't have their high expectations met.\nPoshmark's numbers looked good. Gross merchandise value jumped 43% year over year to $441 million, leading to a 42% rise in revenue. Poshmark managed to post a modest adjusted operating profit, although it lost $0.33 per share due largely to various noncash expense items.\nAmong the latest initiatives from Poshmark was a new category for pet owners trying to shop for their pets. The company expanded into Australia as part of its ongoing effort to boost its international exposure, and new in-listing video and seller shipping discount features helped to heighten the value of the Poshmark platform for sellers.\nLike Bumble, however, investors didn't seem satisfied with Poshmark's guidance. The company sees second-quarter revenue coming in flat to down slightly from first-quarter results. If that means customers might be losing their appetite for Poshmark's listings, it could spell further trouble for the already hard-hit stock.\nKeep your eyes on the Nasdaq\nIn the long run, stocks perform in line with their underlying businesses. For the Nasdaq to recover, high expectations will need to get more realistic. As painful as this process is, it offers opportunities to those with confidence in companies with strong business models.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":252,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":102335782,"gmtCreate":1620176944046,"gmtModify":1704339736081,"author":{"id":"3557272953214384","authorId":"3557272953214384","name":"WGSsss","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c859daf551024a3f95b178c72e1b8354","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3557272953214384","authorIdStr":"3557272953214384"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"good","listText":"good","text":"good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/102335782","repostId":"1199199416","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1199199416","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1620173020,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1199199416?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-05-05 08:03","market":"us","language":"en","title":"S&P 500 ends day 0.7% lower, Nasdaq sheds nearly 2% for worst day since March","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1199199416","media":"CNBC","summary":"The S&P 500 fell on Tuesday amid selling in Big Tech and other high-growth stocks, erasing the bench","content":"<div>\n<p>The S&P 500 fell on Tuesday amid selling in Big Tech and other high-growth stocks, erasing the benchmark’s strong start to the month.The broad market index closed the session 0.7% lower at 4,164.66 ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/05/03/stock-market-futures-open-to-close-new.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"cnbc_highlight","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>S&P 500 ends day 0.7% lower, Nasdaq sheds nearly 2% for worst day since March</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nS&P 500 ends day 0.7% lower, Nasdaq sheds nearly 2% for worst day since March\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-05-05 08:03 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.cnbc.com/2021/05/03/stock-market-futures-open-to-close-new.html><strong>CNBC</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The S&P 500 fell on Tuesday amid selling in Big Tech and other high-growth stocks, erasing the benchmark’s strong start to the month.The broad market index closed the session 0.7% lower at 4,164.66 ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/05/03/stock-market-futures-open-to-close-new.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"161125":"标普500","513500":"标普500ETF","PSQ":"纳指反向ETF","QLD":"纳指两倍做多ETF","TSLA":"特斯拉","UPRO":"三倍做多标普500ETF","PFE":"辉瑞",".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite","AAPL":"苹果",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","SPXU":"三倍做空标普500ETF","SQQQ":"纳指三倍做空ETF","NDAQ":"纳斯达克OMX交易所","SH":"标普500反向ETF","IVV":"标普500指数ETF","BRK.A":"伯克希尔","OEF":"标普100指数ETF-iShares","SPY":"标普500ETF","QQQ":"纳指100ETF","SDS":"两倍做空标普500ETF","BRK.B":"伯克希尔B","QID":"纳指两倍做空ETF","CVS":"西维斯健康","GOOG":"谷歌","CLX":"高乐氏","TQQQ":"纳指三倍做多ETF","GOOGL":"谷歌A"},"source_url":"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/05/03/stock-market-futures-open-to-close-new.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/72bb72e1b84c09fca865c6dcb1bbcd16","article_id":"1199199416","content_text":"The S&P 500 fell on Tuesday amid selling in Big Tech and other high-growth stocks, erasing the benchmark’s strong start to the month.The broad market index closed the session 0.7% lower at 4,164.66 after dropping 1.5% at its low. Pressure on some of the globe’s largest technology companies sent the Nasdaq Composite down 1.9% to 13,633.50 for its worst day since March.Apple, the largest publicly traded company in the U.S., fell 3.5%. Google-parent Alphabet lost 1.6%, Facebook shed 1.3% and electric car maker Tesla dropped 1.7%. Investors did not spare the market’s chipmakers, with Nvidia and Intel losing 3.3% and 0.6%, respectively.The Dow Jones Industrial Average ended the day in the green thanks to strong performance in Dow Inc and Caterpillar. The 30-stock benchmark closed 19.8 points, or 0.1%, higher to 34,133.03 after dropping more than 300 points at one point Tuesday.Reasons for the downward pressure varied, but strategists cited a mix of concerns about rising inflation, fears the Federal Reserve may have to taper monetary stimulus earlier than telegraphed, and the potential for tax increases in the months ahead.U.S. equities hit their lows of the day following Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen’scomments that interest ratesmay have to rise somewhat to keep economy from overheating.Evercore ISI strategist Dennis DeBusschere wrote that while Tuesday’s modest move in rates may not be a loud siren that investors are worried about the Fed, he nonetheless believes taper fears are playing a role.“Best we can tell supply concerns are a major issue for investors and inflation / inflation expectations are becoming a headwind,” he wrote in an email. “Although Fed futures are pricing in a much faster pace of rate hikes vs what the Fed wants...that is not the story today. The story is inflation and stronger growth numbers leading to even more inflation given supply constraints and what that means for equities.”DeBusschere’s supply-side concerns join those of a growing number of executives and investors who say rising input prices are starting to erode profit margins.Warren Buffett, the CEO of Berkshire Hathaway, said during his company’s annual meeting over the weekend that he is seeing “very substantial inflation” and his companies are raising prices.Other companies, such as Clorox, have said in recent earnings reports that the prices they pay for the materials used to make their products are rising and could ultimately be passed on to customers. Commodity prices, from lumber to corn to palladium, have surged in recent months.Others have said that even blowout earnings results have been unable to quell marketplace jitters. Even accounting for Tuesday’s losses, the S&P 500 is still up more than 10% so far this year.“We have gone through a two to three week period that has seen really good news get little or no reaction in markets,” wrote Art Hogan, chief market strategist at National Securities. “Investors get uneasy at new highs, and there have been 25 new highs for the S&P 500 so far this year.”“There are concerns that the roaring 20′s economic explosion will take longer than just this summer as people slowly get comfortable getting out and about,” he added. “Equities look expensive on a trailing basis, but not from a forward looking viewpoint.”With the market at all-time highs, investors are torn between playing the reopening with shares like retailers or continuing to bet on Big Tech, which just reported blockbuster earnings.The move in equities followed solid gains for the Dow on Monday as investors piled into shares that would benefit the most from an economic reopening. The 30-stock benchmark rallied more than 200 points, while the S&P 500 inched up 0.3%. Retail stocks led the market advance on Monday with Gap and Macy’s rallying more than 7%.Pfizershares rose slightly following quarterly resultsthat beat expectations and raising its 2021 guidance.CVS Healthshares jumped 4.4% after the pharmacy chain and insurance companyalso raised its guidance.United States Steelpopped 7.9% after Credit Suisseupgradedthe stock to outperform from underperform, saying that the surge in prices for steel made it clear that the industry was in a “super cycle.”“Investors could be getting increasingly disappointed that stocks are not doing well in the face of fantastic earnings news,” Jim Paulsen, chief investment strategist at the Leuthold Group, told CNBC.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":68,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":106674639,"gmtCreate":1620118399821,"gmtModify":1704338890199,"author":{"id":"3557272953214384","authorId":"3557272953214384","name":"WGSsss","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c859daf551024a3f95b178c72e1b8354","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3557272953214384","authorIdStr":"3557272953214384"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/106674639","repostId":"1168588036","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1168588036","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1620116391,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1168588036?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-05-04 16:19","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Liquidity Tsunami Ends With A Bang: Treasury Expects Just $100BN In Cash Injections Next 2 Months","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1168588036","media":"zerohedge","summary":"Three months ago, theTreasury surprised marketswhen in itsquarterly borrowing forecast, it revealed ","content":"<p>Three months ago, theTreasury surprised marketswhen in itsquarterly borrowing forecast, it revealed that in the first calendar quarter of 2021, it wouldn't need to borrow as much debt as it had recently because the Treasury's cash balance (held in the Treasury General Account, or TGA, which is simply the Treasury's cash balance held at the Fed) would plunge to just $800 billion, down a record $929BN from $1.729 trillion at Dec 31, 2020.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f9ae3f00f7473062d6da5551c2f6a544\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"232\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">This forecast for a flood of liquidity emanating from the Treasury prompted us (and subsequently others) to predict that as a result of the \"mind-boggling liquidity\" of just under $1 trillion in cash set to be unleashed by the Biden admin, stocks would soar as the Treasury's monetary injection would be far bigger than the $120BN in liquidity injected by the Fed every month.</p>\n<p>And while stocks indeed surged to new all time highs, the Treasury's cash flood plan stumbled as the latest,just released Treasury Marketable Borrowing Estimateshave revealed.</p>\n<p>According to the Treasury, during the January – March 2021 quarter, Treasury borrowed $401 billion in privately-held net marketable debt - $126 billion more than the $274 billion originally forecast - and ended the quarter with a cash balance of $1.122 trillion, some $322 trillion more than the $800 billion it had forecast back in February (red arrow below), although as shown in the chart below, the actual TGA cash balance is indeed sliding fast, if not quite as fast as expected three months ago.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8d683a538cb89c49be90f322e990d378\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"252\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">According to the Treasury, the $126 billion increase in borrowing resulted primarily from the increase in the end-of-March cash balance somewhat offset by lower net expenditures.</p>\n<p>So what does the Treasury expect will happen in the current and coming quarter? Here is the summary from the latest Sources and Uses:</p>\n<ul>\n <li>During the April - June 2021 quarter,<b>Treasury expects to borrow $463 billion in privately- held net marketable debt, assuming an end-of-June cash balance of $800 billion.</b>The borrowing estimate is $368 billion higher than announced in February 2021, primarily due to the government’s additional response to the COVID-19 pandemic.</li>\n <li>The Treasury now expects $800BN in cash at June 30, just $100BN less than the latest print of $903BN as of the end of April. This means that the Cash flood which saw the TGA balance decline by $700BN since the start of the year is about to slow to a tricke.</li>\n <li>Treasury is assuming a cash balance of approximately $450 billion at the expiration of the debt limit suspension on July 31 based on expected outflows under its cash management policies and consistent with its authorities and obligations, including the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2019. It notes that \"the actual cash balance on July 31 may vary from this assumption based on changes to expected outflows in that period.\"</li>\n <li>During the July - September 2021 quarter,<b>Treasury expects to borrow $821 billion in privately-held net marketable debt, assuming an end-of-September cash balance of $750 billion.</b></li>\n</ul>\n<p>Of note here: the Treasury almost quintupled its borrowing estimate for the quarter through June, and now expects to borrow $1.3 trillion over the second half of the fiscal year to help pay for a raft of fresh pandemic-relief spending. The Treasury’s projections incorporated the impact of Biden’s $1.9 trillion pandemic-relief bill; in its February&nbsp;outlook<b>the Treasury left out any guess on such spending</b>.</p>\n<p>Meanwhile on the cash side, ahead of Monday’s release some strategists speculated that the Treasury may return its cash balance to where it had been when Congress suspended the federal debt limit was suspended, around $130 billion, unless lawmakers lifted or suspended the&nbsp;ceiling again. It now appears that the Treasury will go for a far bigger cash buffer, as officials assumed an increase or suspension of the ceiling in their projection for $750 billion in cash for the end of September.</p>\n<p>In summary, instead of dropping by $929BN through March 31 as it had expected in February, the Treasury cash balance declined by \"only\" $607BN, a difference of $322BN. And in the current quarter, the Treasury now expects a similar decline in cash as last quarter, a drop of $322BN (vs $300BN previously), although since it is starting from a higher base, the June 30 cash balance will be $800BN instead of $500BN. This is summarized in the table below:</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/da5dc20eb164926f950995532007b71b\" tg-width=\"514\" tg-height=\"87\"></p>\n<p>Finally, here is the full Sources and Uses Reconciliation, showing changes to not only cash, but financing needs and actual debt balances.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cb17a940849e193c78714d614a512f78\" tg-width=\"880\" tg-height=\"383\"></p>\n<p><i>Source:Treasury Sources and Uses Table</i></p>\n<p>To be sure, not everyone believes the latest projections:&nbsp; “These projections are difficult to rely on,” Jefferies analysts&nbsp;Thomas Simonsand&nbsp;Aneta Markowska&nbsp;wrote in a note Monday. “There is a significant amount of risk surrounding the size and pacing of tax receipts during the quarter and outlays related to the stimulus as well. These projections should be viewed in the context that the outlook for financing changes on a daily basis.”</p>\n<p>We will have more to say on this in a subsequent post, but for now the TL/DR is that<b>the liquidity tsunami is over, and the Treasury now expects to release just $100BN in cash for the next two months, from the $903BN currently to $800BN at the end of June, and then just another $50BN lower three months later, or $750BN at the end of Sept.</b></p>\n<p>This slowdown in the Treasury's cash injection, together with the possible announcement of a QE taper some time around the June FOMC meeting, means that the market melt up is about to end with a bang as investors start freaking out about the risk of a hard liquidity stop - one<i><b>without</b></i>the liquidity buffer of Treasury cash injections - some time in mid/late-summer and start frontrunning said event.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Liquidity Tsunami Ends With A Bang: Treasury Expects Just $100BN In Cash Injections Next 2 Months</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nLiquidity Tsunami Ends With A Bang: Treasury Expects Just $100BN In Cash Injections Next 2 Months\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-05-04 16:19 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/liquidity-tsunami-ends-bang-treasury-expects-just-100bn-cash-injection-over-next-2-months><strong>zerohedge</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Three months ago, theTreasury surprised marketswhen in itsquarterly borrowing forecast, it revealed that in the first calendar quarter of 2021, it wouldn't need to borrow as much debt as it had ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/liquidity-tsunami-ends-bang-treasury-expects-just-100bn-cash-injection-over-next-2-months\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SPY":"标普500ETF",".DJI":"道琼斯",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/liquidity-tsunami-ends-bang-treasury-expects-just-100bn-cash-injection-over-next-2-months","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1168588036","content_text":"Three months ago, theTreasury surprised marketswhen in itsquarterly borrowing forecast, it revealed that in the first calendar quarter of 2021, it wouldn't need to borrow as much debt as it had recently because the Treasury's cash balance (held in the Treasury General Account, or TGA, which is simply the Treasury's cash balance held at the Fed) would plunge to just $800 billion, down a record $929BN from $1.729 trillion at Dec 31, 2020.\nThis forecast for a flood of liquidity emanating from the Treasury prompted us (and subsequently others) to predict that as a result of the \"mind-boggling liquidity\" of just under $1 trillion in cash set to be unleashed by the Biden admin, stocks would soar as the Treasury's monetary injection would be far bigger than the $120BN in liquidity injected by the Fed every month.\nAnd while stocks indeed surged to new all time highs, the Treasury's cash flood plan stumbled as the latest,just released Treasury Marketable Borrowing Estimateshave revealed.\nAccording to the Treasury, during the January – March 2021 quarter, Treasury borrowed $401 billion in privately-held net marketable debt - $126 billion more than the $274 billion originally forecast - and ended the quarter with a cash balance of $1.122 trillion, some $322 trillion more than the $800 billion it had forecast back in February (red arrow below), although as shown in the chart below, the actual TGA cash balance is indeed sliding fast, if not quite as fast as expected three months ago.\nAccording to the Treasury, the $126 billion increase in borrowing resulted primarily from the increase in the end-of-March cash balance somewhat offset by lower net expenditures.\nSo what does the Treasury expect will happen in the current and coming quarter? Here is the summary from the latest Sources and Uses:\n\nDuring the April - June 2021 quarter,Treasury expects to borrow $463 billion in privately- held net marketable debt, assuming an end-of-June cash balance of $800 billion.The borrowing estimate is $368 billion higher than announced in February 2021, primarily due to the government’s additional response to the COVID-19 pandemic.\nThe Treasury now expects $800BN in cash at June 30, just $100BN less than the latest print of $903BN as of the end of April. This means that the Cash flood which saw the TGA balance decline by $700BN since the start of the year is about to slow to a tricke.\nTreasury is assuming a cash balance of approximately $450 billion at the expiration of the debt limit suspension on July 31 based on expected outflows under its cash management policies and consistent with its authorities and obligations, including the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2019. It notes that \"the actual cash balance on July 31 may vary from this assumption based on changes to expected outflows in that period.\"\nDuring the July - September 2021 quarter,Treasury expects to borrow $821 billion in privately-held net marketable debt, assuming an end-of-September cash balance of $750 billion.\n\nOf note here: the Treasury almost quintupled its borrowing estimate for the quarter through June, and now expects to borrow $1.3 trillion over the second half of the fiscal year to help pay for a raft of fresh pandemic-relief spending. The Treasury’s projections incorporated the impact of Biden’s $1.9 trillion pandemic-relief bill; in its February outlookthe Treasury left out any guess on such spending.\nMeanwhile on the cash side, ahead of Monday’s release some strategists speculated that the Treasury may return its cash balance to where it had been when Congress suspended the federal debt limit was suspended, around $130 billion, unless lawmakers lifted or suspended the ceiling again. It now appears that the Treasury will go for a far bigger cash buffer, as officials assumed an increase or suspension of the ceiling in their projection for $750 billion in cash for the end of September.\nIn summary, instead of dropping by $929BN through March 31 as it had expected in February, the Treasury cash balance declined by \"only\" $607BN, a difference of $322BN. And in the current quarter, the Treasury now expects a similar decline in cash as last quarter, a drop of $322BN (vs $300BN previously), although since it is starting from a higher base, the June 30 cash balance will be $800BN instead of $500BN. This is summarized in the table below:\n\nFinally, here is the full Sources and Uses Reconciliation, showing changes to not only cash, but financing needs and actual debt balances.\n\nSource:Treasury Sources and Uses Table\nTo be sure, not everyone believes the latest projections:  “These projections are difficult to rely on,” Jefferies analysts Thomas Simonsand Aneta Markowska wrote in a note Monday. “There is a significant amount of risk surrounding the size and pacing of tax receipts during the quarter and outlays related to the stimulus as well. These projections should be viewed in the context that the outlook for financing changes on a daily basis.”\nWe will have more to say on this in a subsequent post, but for now the TL/DR is thatthe liquidity tsunami is over, and the Treasury now expects to release just $100BN in cash for the next two months, from the $903BN currently to $800BN at the end of June, and then just another $50BN lower three months later, or $750BN at the end of Sept.\nThis slowdown in the Treasury's cash injection, together with the possible announcement of a QE taper some time around the June FOMC meeting, means that the market melt up is about to end with a bang as investors start freaking out about the risk of a hard liquidity stop - onewithoutthe liquidity buffer of Treasury cash injections - some time in mid/late-summer and start frontrunning said event.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":206,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":108815724,"gmtCreate":1620010294268,"gmtModify":1704337323242,"author":{"id":"3557272953214384","authorId":"3557272953214384","name":"WGSsss","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c859daf551024a3f95b178c72e1b8354","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3557272953214384","authorIdStr":"3557272953214384"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"God","listText":"God","text":"God","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/108815724","repostId":"1129951066","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1129951066","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1620010240,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1129951066?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-05-03 10:50","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Jumia: Why We Remain Long The Stock And What To Look For In Q1 2021 Results","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1129951066","media":"seekingalpha","summary":"Summary\n\nIn a recent article, we have provided a detailed overview on Jumia‘s business model and its","content":"<p><b>Summary</b></p>\n<ul>\n <li>In a recent article, we have provided a detailed overview on Jumia‘s business model and its financial results in the midst of the COVID pandemic.</li>\n <li>The stock has been very volatile, rising 15-fold from the pandemic lows, but shares are now off nearly 50% from those highs, reflecting mixed financials and general pressure on tech.</li>\n <li>For Q1 2021, it will be key to watch continued impact from the business mix shift and efficiency measures with a focus on marketplace revenue, profitability, and JumiaPay platform penetration.</li>\n <li>With a full year of business mix shift and efficiency measures being implemented, we may see fairer comparisons vs. 2020.</li>\n <li>We believe Jumia can reach a market cap of at least $10bn within the next 2-3 years.</li>\n</ul>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/545e2c2f7b0bd637a8869f73f02365cd\" tg-width=\"1536\" tg-height=\"733\"><span>Photo by ipopba/iStock via Getty Images</span></p>\n<p><b>Investment thesis</b></p>\n<p>In&nbsp;our first article about Jumia&nbsp;(NYSE:JMIA)&nbsp;we argued that its high valuation warranted significant improvements in business metrics. Now, a few months down the road, we'll provide a view on whether we think the company was able to deliver or not and what investors should expect for Q1 2021 results and beyond. Interested readers can go to our&nbsp;previous article to read about why we are long Jumia stock&nbsp;since it was trading around $3-4 back in the first half of 2020.</p>\n<p>All in all, 2020 was a wild ride for Jumia Technologies. The stock rose by &gt;1,500% from the pandemic lows in March 2020 but saw significant declines from those highs in the past weeks. The stock is now off by around 50% from its highs as of this writing.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5c3e67f75a768fe1255686bc0703a250\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"403\"><span>Data by YCharts</span></p>\n<p>The reasons for this volatility are manyfold. Jumia entered 2020 with a significant shift in its business model away from first-party revenues towards its third-party marketplace revenues which impacted overall revenue growth significantly. And within its marketplace segment, Jumia is pivoting towards higher-frequency, every-day product categories like food, cosmetics, clothing, a.o., away from its reliance on phones and electronics. The company also implemented cost-cutting measures and exited several markets like Cameroon.</p>\n<p>The financial results for 2020 were reflecting just that and were far from impressive. Every single quarter in 2020 showed declines in GMV (except for Q4), which reflects the total value of orders for products and services on its platform. Remember that other e-commerce operators around the globe like Amazon (AMZN), Shopify (SHOP), or MercadoLibre (MELI) showed strong growth in their GMV and other metrics for the past year and grew their businesses from much larger bases. So why does Jumia fall short of matching up to its larger peers?</p>\n<p>The reason is fairly simple: Jumia is still shifting its business to focus on the highest growing product categories and geographies and therefore implemented a business mix shift towards exactly these higher life-time value, every-day product categories which are intended to:</p>\n<ul>\n <li>Drive up frequency of orders at better unit economics, and</li>\n <li>diversify the business away from relying mostly on one-time purchase items like phones and electronics.</li>\n</ul>\n<p>Higher order frequency order items can also positively impact JumiaPay on-platform penetration, which is its fintech offering. So in general, this business transition makes complete sense.</p>\n<p>However, the ongoing shift did not impress investors when it comes to the financial metrics that came along with it. This, together with the recent pressure on tech stocks in general put significant pressure on Jumia stock.</p>\n<p>Before we dig into our outlook for Q1 2021 and the reasons why we think the stock might soon tick up again, let's just quickly recap what the company actually does.</p>\n<p><b>Company overview</b></p>\n<p>In short, Jumia is an e-commerce operator with a Pan-African presence. At the end of 2020, the company had over&nbsp;57 million product listings&nbsp;on its marketplace ranging from fashion and apparel, to smartphones, home and living, fast-moving consumer goods, beauty and perfumes and other electronics. Jumia operates across 11 countries that together have a population of 600 million people, which accounts for &gt;70% of Africa's GDP of €2 trillion and almost 70% of Africa's internet users. Besides its e-commerce platform that connects buyers and sellers, the company also offers payment solutions via its JumiaPay platform, as well as logistics and marketing services.</p>\n<p>As of Dec 2020, the company had 6.8 million Annual Active Consumers,up 12%&nbsp;compared to the end of 2019, and&nbsp;around 110k of active sellers&nbsp;on its platform. Obviously, there is a large market for Jumia to go after and its penetration sits at around 1% from a total addressable population perspective.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1a047878ff951ba3531a58c53cfede01\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"328\"><span>Source: company presentation</span></p>\n<p><b>Financial performance for 2020</b></p>\n<p>It is fair to say that Jumia's financials were not very impressive so far. For the full year, Jumia reported:</p>\n<ul>\n <li>A decline in overall revenue of 12.9%, while marketplace revenue grew by 19.6%. Growth in marketplace revenue (which excludes revenue from 1st party sales), however, slowed down to only 6.5% growth in Q4 2020.</li>\n <li>GMV was down 21% for the full year based on GMV declines for the first three quarters of 2020. On the positive side GMV ticked up by 23% in Q4 2020 vs. the comparable 2019 quarter supported by the company's Black Friday event in November 2020.</li>\n <li>Gross profit increased by 22.3% vs. full year 2019 and reached positive territory after fulfillment expense.</li>\n <li>Jumia is still burning through cash with an adjusted EBITDA of negative €119.5 million and an operating loss of negative €149.2 million for 2020.</li>\n</ul>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5cc15bb9adf3553403004e3a59f0f396\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"434\"><span>Source: press release</span></p>\n<p>On the positive side, 2020<i>marketplace revenue</i>growth has been positive in every single quarter, albeit with declining growth rates in Q4 at only 6.5% compared to above 20% YoY growth rates for the earlier quarters in 2020. However, it needs to be noted that the growth rate is impacted by the ongoing business mix rebalancing initiatives. Also worth to note is that marketplace revenue was growing in every quarter in 2020 despite the fact that fulfillment, sales and marketing, as well as G&amp;A expenses were significantly reduced on a YoY basis, which drove some noteworthy improvements on a gross profit level.</p>\n<p><i>Gross profit</i>has been growing steadily over the past quarters with 22.3% growth for the full year of 2020 and 12.5% growth for the most recent quarter. In fact, Jumia's management has frequently reiterated that their business should be measured primarily on gross profit level. In its efforts to drive down cost and increase profitability, gross profit after fulfillment expense in Q4 2020 was positive at €1.0 compared to negative €2.9 per order in Q4 2019.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7a18c7836211e449946ac4e9d553c522\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"404\"><span>Source: Investor presentation</span></p>\n<p>In addition to improvements on gross profit level, also the<i>number of annual active consumers</i>continued to grow and reached 6.8 million at the end of 2020, reflecting 12% growth vs. the end of 2019.</p>\n<p>One negative aspect to mention is that the<i>average number of orders</i>has declined in&nbsp;Q4 2020&nbsp;vs. the prior year quarter. This is worrisome since it stands in contrast to management's strategy of pivoting towards higher-frequency purchase product categories (e.g. food, cosmetics, clothing, a.o.) and away from its reliance on phones and electronics. However, it must be mentioned here, too, that total orders are impacted mostly by decreases in airtime recharge transactions on the JumiaPay platform accompanied (albeit to a lesser extent) by the exit from countries like Cameroon, Rwanda and Tanzania that the company executed in 2019/2020 and which are not accounted for in the total orders metric.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d7cc7094a826cc28c50d388c4ba04094\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"154\"></p>\n<p></p>\n<p>Management explained the decline in total orders as follows:</p>\n<blockquote>\n Orders reached 8.1 million, down 3% year-over-year on the back of a 14% decrease in digital services transactions on the JumiaPay app, while Orders on the rest of the platform were stable. (...) JumiaPay app is concentrated in airtime recharge transactions as a result of reduced consumer incentives within this category which has historically been promotionally intensive.\n</blockquote>\n<p>Worth to mention is that compared to Q3 2020, the total number of orders was up 21%. So at least we are seeing a sequential increase in total order volume.</p>\n<p>Importantly, Jumia made<i>progress in reducing the overall rate of Cancellations, Failed Deliveries and Returns</i>(CFDR):</p>\n<ul>\n <li>CFDR rate as a percentage of GMV improved from 30.3% in 2019 to 24.7% in 2020, while the CFDR rate as a percentage of Orders improved from 22.5% in 2019 to 16.1% in 2020.</li>\n <li>Factoring in CFDR, full-year total orders after CFDR for all items excluding Phones and Electronics actually showed an increase by 19% YoY and 14% after CFDR for all product categories.</li>\n <li>Also GMV after adjusting for CFDR showed growth of 15% YoY, especially driven by Jumia's digital services, food delivery and non-phone electronic, with 41%, 32% and 10% growth respectively.</li>\n</ul>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b90cfa964fffdbe597e01ad312e6ad77\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"378\"><span>Source: Investor presentation</span></p>\n<p>For Q1 2021 we expect to see continued impacts from the business mix shift as evidenced by the most recent quarter, during which the share of GMV from Phones &amp; Electronics declined significantly and now sits at 43% as of Dec 2020. Investors should closely watch the ongoing impact from the transition towards higher-frequency purchase, every-day product categories and the corresponding interplay between GMV, Total Orders and CFDR moving forward.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6ad57a678143756c07bf189e934e732d\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"170\"><span>Source: Investor presentation</span></p>\n<p><i><b>JumiaPay shows solid growth</b></i></p>\n<p>While Jumia's e-commerce platform is the one part of the business, its payments platform JumiaPay is said to be the actual raw diamond in the making. Q4 results for JumiaPay showed:</p>\n<ul>\n <li>TPV growth of 30% to €59.3 million, with on-platform TPV penetration reaching 25.7% of GMV in Q4 2020 compared to 15.6% of GMV in Q4 2019.</li>\n <li>In total, 33.1% of Orders placed on the Jumia platform were being transacted with JumiaPay compared to 29.5% in Q4 2019.</li>\n</ul>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8eea7dec2ff85cc13ffddcc5edcafa7a\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"382\"></p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d0638890e9c2174b976f5e69b82d7c15\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"111\"><span>Source: Investor presentation / PR</span></p>\n<p>Despite the robust growth, we see a slight decline in overall growth rates for Q4 compared to prior quarters also for JumiaPay. Some of that decline can be explained by the before-mentioned decline in airtime recharge transactions. But it also seems that there are some underlying issues with adoption, and maybe lack of marketing activities and investments from management. Investors should closely watch JumiaPay metrics moving forward.</p>\n<p><b>First Quarter 2021 outlook</b></p>\n<p>Now, with Q1 results on the horizon we expect that this quarter could be one of the first quarters where YoY comparisons for Jumia's key business metrics start to shift into a more positive direction, accompanied by continued improvements on a gross profit level as efficiency measures continue. The move away from higher cost items like Phones &amp; Electronics towards higher-frequency purchase items from the fashion, beauty, FMCG, and food delivery categories has now been going on for more than a year and should make for easier YoY comparisons in the quarters ahead. Furthermore, the impact from the exit of countries like Cameroon now being visible in full-year 2020 metrics should also play out favourably.</p>\n<p>We strongly believe that the business mix rebalancing helps to diversify the business towards more frequent purchases which drive improved unit economics and positive gross profit developments. We will be closely watching those metrics for Q1 2021 and beyond, including platform penetration and growth for JumiaPay. While JumiaPay platform penetration is growing very robustly, we would like to see transaction volume growth getting back to levels we saw in the earlier quarters in 2020. This is where we see that management may need to step up its marketing spending to drive awareness and penetration.</p>\n<p>Valuation remains stretched, but that's nothing long-term investors should be concerned about</p>\n<p>Following the almost 50% decline in Jumia's stock price the company's market capitalization currently sits around $3bn. Since first-party revenue is volatile and not a key focus for the company, we value Jumia on the basis of marketplace revenue, which came in at around €94 million for 2020. Hence, the current price to marketplace revenue multiple is 30x - not cheap at all.</p>\n<p>However, valuing Jumia right now based on general revenue multiples falls short of the potential that the company has in front of it. The<i>market opportunity</i>remains significant: around 17 million SMEs and merchants and $4.0tn in household and B2B spending underpin the large untapped opportunity for digitization of commerce and payments in Africa (seehere). McKinsey estimates that African e-commerce could account for 10% of the continent's overall retail sales by 2025, which would be $75 billion in annual revenue potential (seehere). Irrespective of the actual market size, it is clear that Jumia has only penetrated a very small portion of that market for now. We are not saying that Jumia will ever grow into a comparable valuation like Amazon, Shopify or MercadoLibre, but it doesn't need to do that to become a winning investment. By at least capturing a fraction of the $75 billion e-commerce opportunity, Jumia may be well-positioned to become a technology leader and expand its market capitalization to at least $10 billion within the next 2-3 years.</p>\n<p><b>Risks</b></p>\n<p>Clearly, execution is the biggest risk. While we generally applaud management's efficiency efforts, we fear that the focus may be too strongly on cost-cutting at the expense of growing its active customer base, which could result in lackluster growth rates. We have seen this become reality in Q4 2020 numbers with declines in marketplace revenue and JumiaPay growth rates vs. prior quarters. The recent cost-cutting and efficiency measures have shown to positively impact the company's gross profits. However, Jumia cannot operate forever at a low flame and ultimately needs to ramp-up its marketing and other investments to accelerate customer penetration and growth overall. Remember that GMV growth was negative for 3 out of 4 quarters in 2020 and only in Q4 showed positive YoY growth rates supported by the company's Black Friday event in November 2020. This shows that increases in marketing spend are inevitable in order to remain in the front seat and stay ahead of competitors.</p>\n<p>Another risk is not so much a company-specific risk but a matter of whether investors have the required patience. The shift to digital commerce in Africa won't happen overnight. Remember that it took Amazon, MercadoLibre or Alibaba(NYSE:BABA)more than 20 years to become the e-commerce giants that they are today. With the complex infrastructure in Africa and often still nascent internet penetration, especially in rural areas, it may take decades for Jumia to drive online penetration in commerce to a large enough level and to then capture a significant share. Investors need to be patient, and that means at least 10 years + down the road.</p>\n<p><b>Conclusion</b></p>\n<p>We recently wrote thatJumia's high valuation warrants significant improvements in business metrics. So what is the verdict a few months later? We see improvements on its path to continued growth while reducing its operating expenses along the way. While we have not seen the level of business metric improvements that we hoped for, Jumia remains on track to make step-by-step improvements across its business. We are particularly happy to see marketplace revenue growth in parallel to improving profitability measures. Order volume growth and GMV should be carefully looked at going forward and we can only reiterate that management should not solely focus on cost-cutting at the detriment of its growth opportunities. JumiaPay developments will be watched closely in the Q1 2021 report. The potential for monetization of its payment platform is huge and may drive significant value in the future when it reaches a certain scale, and there may even be the possibility that JumiaPay may be carved out as a standalone entity.</p>\n<p>While in the short-term Jumia stock will likely remain very volatile, the long-term opportunity for the company is huge and we continue to believe that Jumia is well positioned to become the next big e-commerce player. But this will not happen in a year or two. It is a long-term play of 10 years +. Investors need to stay very patient with this stock and need to accept setbacks along the way. Our conviction and patience is unchanged and we therefore continue to stay long the stock as we believe the company can at least grow to a market cap of &gt;$10 billion within the next 2-3 years.</p>","source":"seekingalpha","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Jumia: Why We Remain Long The Stock And What To Look For In Q1 2021 Results</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nJumia: Why We Remain Long The Stock And What To Look For In Q1 2021 Results\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-05-03 10:50 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4423644-jumia-remain-long-stock-q1-2021-results><strong>seekingalpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Summary\n\nIn a recent article, we have provided a detailed overview on Jumia‘s business model and its financial results in the midst of the COVID pandemic.\nThe stock has been very volatile, rising 15-...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4423644-jumia-remain-long-stock-q1-2021-results\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"JMIA":"Jumia Technologies AG"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4423644-jumia-remain-long-stock-q1-2021-results","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5a36db9d73b4222bc376d24ccc48c8a4","article_id":"1129951066","content_text":"Summary\n\nIn a recent article, we have provided a detailed overview on Jumia‘s business model and its financial results in the midst of the COVID pandemic.\nThe stock has been very volatile, rising 15-fold from the pandemic lows, but shares are now off nearly 50% from those highs, reflecting mixed financials and general pressure on tech.\nFor Q1 2021, it will be key to watch continued impact from the business mix shift and efficiency measures with a focus on marketplace revenue, profitability, and JumiaPay platform penetration.\nWith a full year of business mix shift and efficiency measures being implemented, we may see fairer comparisons vs. 2020.\nWe believe Jumia can reach a market cap of at least $10bn within the next 2-3 years.\n\nPhoto by ipopba/iStock via Getty Images\nInvestment thesis\nIn our first article about Jumia (NYSE:JMIA) we argued that its high valuation warranted significant improvements in business metrics. Now, a few months down the road, we'll provide a view on whether we think the company was able to deliver or not and what investors should expect for Q1 2021 results and beyond. Interested readers can go to our previous article to read about why we are long Jumia stock since it was trading around $3-4 back in the first half of 2020.\nAll in all, 2020 was a wild ride for Jumia Technologies. The stock rose by >1,500% from the pandemic lows in March 2020 but saw significant declines from those highs in the past weeks. The stock is now off by around 50% from its highs as of this writing.\nData by YCharts\nThe reasons for this volatility are manyfold. Jumia entered 2020 with a significant shift in its business model away from first-party revenues towards its third-party marketplace revenues which impacted overall revenue growth significantly. And within its marketplace segment, Jumia is pivoting towards higher-frequency, every-day product categories like food, cosmetics, clothing, a.o., away from its reliance on phones and electronics. The company also implemented cost-cutting measures and exited several markets like Cameroon.\nThe financial results for 2020 were reflecting just that and were far from impressive. Every single quarter in 2020 showed declines in GMV (except for Q4), which reflects the total value of orders for products and services on its platform. Remember that other e-commerce operators around the globe like Amazon (AMZN), Shopify (SHOP), or MercadoLibre (MELI) showed strong growth in their GMV and other metrics for the past year and grew their businesses from much larger bases. So why does Jumia fall short of matching up to its larger peers?\nThe reason is fairly simple: Jumia is still shifting its business to focus on the highest growing product categories and geographies and therefore implemented a business mix shift towards exactly these higher life-time value, every-day product categories which are intended to:\n\nDrive up frequency of orders at better unit economics, and\ndiversify the business away from relying mostly on one-time purchase items like phones and electronics.\n\nHigher order frequency order items can also positively impact JumiaPay on-platform penetration, which is its fintech offering. So in general, this business transition makes complete sense.\nHowever, the ongoing shift did not impress investors when it comes to the financial metrics that came along with it. This, together with the recent pressure on tech stocks in general put significant pressure on Jumia stock.\nBefore we dig into our outlook for Q1 2021 and the reasons why we think the stock might soon tick up again, let's just quickly recap what the company actually does.\nCompany overview\nIn short, Jumia is an e-commerce operator with a Pan-African presence. At the end of 2020, the company had over 57 million product listings on its marketplace ranging from fashion and apparel, to smartphones, home and living, fast-moving consumer goods, beauty and perfumes and other electronics. Jumia operates across 11 countries that together have a population of 600 million people, which accounts for >70% of Africa's GDP of €2 trillion and almost 70% of Africa's internet users. Besides its e-commerce platform that connects buyers and sellers, the company also offers payment solutions via its JumiaPay platform, as well as logistics and marketing services.\nAs of Dec 2020, the company had 6.8 million Annual Active Consumers,up 12% compared to the end of 2019, and around 110k of active sellers on its platform. Obviously, there is a large market for Jumia to go after and its penetration sits at around 1% from a total addressable population perspective.\nSource: company presentation\nFinancial performance for 2020\nIt is fair to say that Jumia's financials were not very impressive so far. For the full year, Jumia reported:\n\nA decline in overall revenue of 12.9%, while marketplace revenue grew by 19.6%. Growth in marketplace revenue (which excludes revenue from 1st party sales), however, slowed down to only 6.5% growth in Q4 2020.\nGMV was down 21% for the full year based on GMV declines for the first three quarters of 2020. On the positive side GMV ticked up by 23% in Q4 2020 vs. the comparable 2019 quarter supported by the company's Black Friday event in November 2020.\nGross profit increased by 22.3% vs. full year 2019 and reached positive territory after fulfillment expense.\nJumia is still burning through cash with an adjusted EBITDA of negative €119.5 million and an operating loss of negative €149.2 million for 2020.\n\nSource: press release\nOn the positive side, 2020marketplace revenuegrowth has been positive in every single quarter, albeit with declining growth rates in Q4 at only 6.5% compared to above 20% YoY growth rates for the earlier quarters in 2020. However, it needs to be noted that the growth rate is impacted by the ongoing business mix rebalancing initiatives. Also worth to note is that marketplace revenue was growing in every quarter in 2020 despite the fact that fulfillment, sales and marketing, as well as G&A expenses were significantly reduced on a YoY basis, which drove some noteworthy improvements on a gross profit level.\nGross profithas been growing steadily over the past quarters with 22.3% growth for the full year of 2020 and 12.5% growth for the most recent quarter. In fact, Jumia's management has frequently reiterated that their business should be measured primarily on gross profit level. In its efforts to drive down cost and increase profitability, gross profit after fulfillment expense in Q4 2020 was positive at €1.0 compared to negative €2.9 per order in Q4 2019.\nSource: Investor presentation\nIn addition to improvements on gross profit level, also thenumber of annual active consumerscontinued to grow and reached 6.8 million at the end of 2020, reflecting 12% growth vs. the end of 2019.\nOne negative aspect to mention is that theaverage number of ordershas declined in Q4 2020 vs. the prior year quarter. This is worrisome since it stands in contrast to management's strategy of pivoting towards higher-frequency purchase product categories (e.g. food, cosmetics, clothing, a.o.) and away from its reliance on phones and electronics. However, it must be mentioned here, too, that total orders are impacted mostly by decreases in airtime recharge transactions on the JumiaPay platform accompanied (albeit to a lesser extent) by the exit from countries like Cameroon, Rwanda and Tanzania that the company executed in 2019/2020 and which are not accounted for in the total orders metric.\n\n\nManagement explained the decline in total orders as follows:\n\n Orders reached 8.1 million, down 3% year-over-year on the back of a 14% decrease in digital services transactions on the JumiaPay app, while Orders on the rest of the platform were stable. (...) JumiaPay app is concentrated in airtime recharge transactions as a result of reduced consumer incentives within this category which has historically been promotionally intensive.\n\nWorth to mention is that compared to Q3 2020, the total number of orders was up 21%. So at least we are seeing a sequential increase in total order volume.\nImportantly, Jumia madeprogress in reducing the overall rate of Cancellations, Failed Deliveries and Returns(CFDR):\n\nCFDR rate as a percentage of GMV improved from 30.3% in 2019 to 24.7% in 2020, while the CFDR rate as a percentage of Orders improved from 22.5% in 2019 to 16.1% in 2020.\nFactoring in CFDR, full-year total orders after CFDR for all items excluding Phones and Electronics actually showed an increase by 19% YoY and 14% after CFDR for all product categories.\nAlso GMV after adjusting for CFDR showed growth of 15% YoY, especially driven by Jumia's digital services, food delivery and non-phone electronic, with 41%, 32% and 10% growth respectively.\n\nSource: Investor presentation\nFor Q1 2021 we expect to see continued impacts from the business mix shift as evidenced by the most recent quarter, during which the share of GMV from Phones & Electronics declined significantly and now sits at 43% as of Dec 2020. Investors should closely watch the ongoing impact from the transition towards higher-frequency purchase, every-day product categories and the corresponding interplay between GMV, Total Orders and CFDR moving forward.\nSource: Investor presentation\nJumiaPay shows solid growth\nWhile Jumia's e-commerce platform is the one part of the business, its payments platform JumiaPay is said to be the actual raw diamond in the making. Q4 results for JumiaPay showed:\n\nTPV growth of 30% to €59.3 million, with on-platform TPV penetration reaching 25.7% of GMV in Q4 2020 compared to 15.6% of GMV in Q4 2019.\nIn total, 33.1% of Orders placed on the Jumia platform were being transacted with JumiaPay compared to 29.5% in Q4 2019.\n\n\nSource: Investor presentation / PR\nDespite the robust growth, we see a slight decline in overall growth rates for Q4 compared to prior quarters also for JumiaPay. Some of that decline can be explained by the before-mentioned decline in airtime recharge transactions. But it also seems that there are some underlying issues with adoption, and maybe lack of marketing activities and investments from management. Investors should closely watch JumiaPay metrics moving forward.\nFirst Quarter 2021 outlook\nNow, with Q1 results on the horizon we expect that this quarter could be one of the first quarters where YoY comparisons for Jumia's key business metrics start to shift into a more positive direction, accompanied by continued improvements on a gross profit level as efficiency measures continue. The move away from higher cost items like Phones & Electronics towards higher-frequency purchase items from the fashion, beauty, FMCG, and food delivery categories has now been going on for more than a year and should make for easier YoY comparisons in the quarters ahead. Furthermore, the impact from the exit of countries like Cameroon now being visible in full-year 2020 metrics should also play out favourably.\nWe strongly believe that the business mix rebalancing helps to diversify the business towards more frequent purchases which drive improved unit economics and positive gross profit developments. We will be closely watching those metrics for Q1 2021 and beyond, including platform penetration and growth for JumiaPay. While JumiaPay platform penetration is growing very robustly, we would like to see transaction volume growth getting back to levels we saw in the earlier quarters in 2020. This is where we see that management may need to step up its marketing spending to drive awareness and penetration.\nValuation remains stretched, but that's nothing long-term investors should be concerned about\nFollowing the almost 50% decline in Jumia's stock price the company's market capitalization currently sits around $3bn. Since first-party revenue is volatile and not a key focus for the company, we value Jumia on the basis of marketplace revenue, which came in at around €94 million for 2020. Hence, the current price to marketplace revenue multiple is 30x - not cheap at all.\nHowever, valuing Jumia right now based on general revenue multiples falls short of the potential that the company has in front of it. Themarket opportunityremains significant: around 17 million SMEs and merchants and $4.0tn in household and B2B spending underpin the large untapped opportunity for digitization of commerce and payments in Africa (seehere). McKinsey estimates that African e-commerce could account for 10% of the continent's overall retail sales by 2025, which would be $75 billion in annual revenue potential (seehere). Irrespective of the actual market size, it is clear that Jumia has only penetrated a very small portion of that market for now. We are not saying that Jumia will ever grow into a comparable valuation like Amazon, Shopify or MercadoLibre, but it doesn't need to do that to become a winning investment. By at least capturing a fraction of the $75 billion e-commerce opportunity, Jumia may be well-positioned to become a technology leader and expand its market capitalization to at least $10 billion within the next 2-3 years.\nRisks\nClearly, execution is the biggest risk. While we generally applaud management's efficiency efforts, we fear that the focus may be too strongly on cost-cutting at the expense of growing its active customer base, which could result in lackluster growth rates. We have seen this become reality in Q4 2020 numbers with declines in marketplace revenue and JumiaPay growth rates vs. prior quarters. The recent cost-cutting and efficiency measures have shown to positively impact the company's gross profits. However, Jumia cannot operate forever at a low flame and ultimately needs to ramp-up its marketing and other investments to accelerate customer penetration and growth overall. Remember that GMV growth was negative for 3 out of 4 quarters in 2020 and only in Q4 showed positive YoY growth rates supported by the company's Black Friday event in November 2020. This shows that increases in marketing spend are inevitable in order to remain in the front seat and stay ahead of competitors.\nAnother risk is not so much a company-specific risk but a matter of whether investors have the required patience. The shift to digital commerce in Africa won't happen overnight. Remember that it took Amazon, MercadoLibre or Alibaba(NYSE:BABA)more than 20 years to become the e-commerce giants that they are today. With the complex infrastructure in Africa and often still nascent internet penetration, especially in rural areas, it may take decades for Jumia to drive online penetration in commerce to a large enough level and to then capture a significant share. Investors need to be patient, and that means at least 10 years + down the road.\nConclusion\nWe recently wrote thatJumia's high valuation warrants significant improvements in business metrics. So what is the verdict a few months later? We see improvements on its path to continued growth while reducing its operating expenses along the way. While we have not seen the level of business metric improvements that we hoped for, Jumia remains on track to make step-by-step improvements across its business. We are particularly happy to see marketplace revenue growth in parallel to improving profitability measures. Order volume growth and GMV should be carefully looked at going forward and we can only reiterate that management should not solely focus on cost-cutting at the detriment of its growth opportunities. JumiaPay developments will be watched closely in the Q1 2021 report. The potential for monetization of its payment platform is huge and may drive significant value in the future when it reaches a certain scale, and there may even be the possibility that JumiaPay may be carved out as a standalone entity.\nWhile in the short-term Jumia stock will likely remain very volatile, the long-term opportunity for the company is huge and we continue to believe that Jumia is well positioned to become the next big e-commerce player. But this will not happen in a year or two. It is a long-term play of 10 years +. Investors need to stay very patient with this stock and need to accept setbacks along the way. Our conviction and patience is unchanged and we therefore continue to stay long the stock as we believe the company can at least grow to a market cap of >$10 billion within the next 2-3 years.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":220,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":101654983,"gmtCreate":1619912102842,"gmtModify":1704336167455,"author":{"id":"3557272953214384","authorId":"3557272953214384","name":"WGSsss","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c859daf551024a3f95b178c72e1b8354","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3557272953214384","authorIdStr":"3557272953214384"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/101654983","repostId":"1142063705","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1142063705","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1619796118,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1142063705?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-04-30 23:21","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Europe's antitrust crackdown on Apple hints at what's coming for the company in the U.S.","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1142063705","media":"CNBC","summary":"For a long time, the European Commission seemed to stand apart from the U.S. in cracking down on tech giants with antitrust fines againstGoogleand privacy rules like the General Data Protection Regulation.“The Commission’s argument onSpotify’sbehalf is the opposite of fair competition,” Apple said in a statement following Vestager’s announcement, referring to the music streaming company that raised the competition complaint. Apple said Spotify wants “all the benefits of the App Store but don’t t","content":"<div>\n<p>For a long time, the European Commission seemed to stand apart from the U.S. in cracking down on tech giants with antitrust fines againstGoogleand privacy rules like the General Data Protection ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/04/30/eu-leads-tech-crackdown-but-the-us-isnt-far-behind.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"cnbc_highlight","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Europe's antitrust crackdown on Apple hints at what's coming for the company in the U.S.</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nEurope's antitrust crackdown on Apple hints at what's coming for the company in the U.S.\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-04-30 23:21 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.cnbc.com/2021/04/30/eu-leads-tech-crackdown-but-the-us-isnt-far-behind.html><strong>CNBC</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>For a long time, the European Commission seemed to stand apart from the U.S. in cracking down on tech giants with antitrust fines againstGoogleand privacy rules like the General Data Protection ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/04/30/eu-leads-tech-crackdown-but-the-us-isnt-far-behind.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/04/30/eu-leads-tech-crackdown-but-the-us-isnt-far-behind.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/72bb72e1b84c09fca865c6dcb1bbcd16","article_id":"1142063705","content_text":"For a long time, the European Commission seemed to stand apart from the U.S. in cracking down on tech giants with antitrust fines againstGoogleand privacy rules like the General Data Protection Regulation.\nBut when the EU competition policy chief Margrethe Vestagerannounced Friday a preliminary findingthatApplehas abused its dominant power in the distribution of streaming music apps, the U.S. finally seems poised to move in a similar direction.\n“The Commission’s argument onSpotify’sbehalf is the opposite of fair competition,” Apple said in a statement following Vestager’s announcement, referring to the music streaming company that raised the competition complaint. Apple said Spotify wants “all the benefits of the App Store but don’t think they should have to pay anything for that,” by choosing to object to its 15-30% commission on in-app payments for streaming apps.\nApple isn’t currently facing any antitrust charges from government officials in the U.S. and such a lawsuit may never materialize, though the Department of Justice wasreportedly granted oversight of the company’s competitive practices in 2019. But even if the government declines to press charges, recent actions in Congress, state legislatures and in private lawsuits demonstrate a significant shift in the American public’s sentiment toward Apple and the tech industry at large.\nWhen the commissionslapped its first record competition fineagainstGooglein 2017, it wasn’t yet clear that the U.S. might be ready to move on from its once-cozy relationship with its booming tech industry. But in 2018, on the heels of the revelations of howFacebookuser data was used by analytics company Cambridge Analytica during the 2016 election, and increasing questions about how tech platforms can impact American democracy, that seemed to change.\nNow, as Europe continues to move forward with its probe into Apple, the U.S. no longer seems to be so far behind.\nHere’s where Apple stands to face risk of antitrust action or regulation in the U.S.:\nDOJ\nThe DOJ has already moved forward with a massive lawsuit against Google, so it could take some time if it decides to ramp up a probe into Apple. Though the DOJ’s Antitrust Division took on oversight authority of Apple in a 2019 agreement with the FTC, according to aWall Street Journal report, the Google investigation has seemed to take priority.\nStill, then-Attorney General Bill Barr announced later that year that the DOJ wouldconduct a broad antitrust review of Big Tech companies.\nAny action from the DOJ or state enforcers would take the form of a settlement or lawsuit, which would put Apple’s fate in the hands of the courts.\nPrivate lawsuits\nApple’s most immediate challenge in the U.S. has come from private companies bringing antitrust charges against its business in court.\nThe most notable of these lawsuits isfrom Fortnite-maker Epic Games, which is set to begin its trial on Monday. Epic filed its lawsuit with a PR blitz afterchallenging Apple’s in-app payment feeby advertising in its app an alternative, cheaper way to buy character outfits from Epic directly, violating Apple’s rules. That prompted Apple to remove Fortnite from its App Store. Epic filed the suit shortly after and Applefiled counterclaimsagainst Epic for allegedly breaching its contract.\n“Although Epic portrays itself as a modern corporate Robin Hood, in reality it is a multi-billion dollar enterprise that simply wants to pay nothing for the tremendous value it derives from the App Store,” Apple said in a filing with the District Court for the Northern District of California in September.\nCongress\nJust last week,several app-makers testified before the Senate Judiciary subcommittee on antitrust about the alleged anti-competitive harms they’ve facedfrom restrictions on both Apple and Google’s app stores.\nRepresentatives from Apple and Google told lawmakers they simply charge for the technology and the work they put into running the app stores, which have significantly lowered distribution costs for app developers over the years.\nBut witnesses from Tinder-ownerMatch Group, item-tracking device-maker Tile and Spotify painted a different picture.\n“We’re all afraid,” Match Group chief legal officer Jared Sine testified of the platforms’ broad power over their businesses.\nThe witnesses discussed the seemingly arbitrary nature by which Apple allegedly enforces its App Store rules. Spotify’s legal chief claimed Apple has threatened retaliation on numerous occasions and Tile’s top lawyer said Apple denied access to a key feature that wouldimprove their object-tracking product, before utilizing it for Apple’s own rival gadget,called AirTag.\nTile said that while Apple now makes the feature available for third-party developers to incorporate, accessing it would mean handing over a significant amount of data and control to Apple. Apple’s representative said its product is different from Tile’s and opening the feature in question will encourage further competition in the space.\nSenators at the hearing seemed receptive to the app developers’ complaints, which build on earlier claims made before House lawmakers. The House Judiciary subcommittee on antitrust found in a more than year-long probe thatAmazon, Apple, Facebook and Googleall hold monopoly power, and lawmakers are currently crafting bills to enable stronger antitrust enforcement of digital markets.\nState Legislatures\nSeveral state legislatures have beenconsidering bills that would require platforms like Apple and Google to allow app-makers to use their own payment processing systems. While the bills have so far hadvarying degrees of successin the early stages of lawmaking, passage in one state could raise a host of questions about how it should be enforced given the ambiguous nature of digital borders.\nThe bills have been supported by the Coalition for App Fairness, a group of companies that have complained about app store fees, including Epic Games, Match Group and Spotify.\nApple has often argued that it maintains features like payments within its own ecosystem in order to protect consumers and secure their data, though app developers and lawmakers have expressed skepticism about that reasoning.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":38,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":103872229,"gmtCreate":1619772044661,"gmtModify":1704272143679,"author":{"id":"3557272953214384","authorId":"3557272953214384","name":"WGSsss","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c859daf551024a3f95b178c72e1b8354","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3557272953214384","authorIdStr":"3557272953214384"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Goodp","listText":"Goodp","text":"Goodp","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/103872229","repostId":"1162193437","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1162193437","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1619771641,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1162193437?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-04-30 16:34","market":"us","language":"en","title":"EU’s Vestager Set to Accuse Apple of Unfairly Squeezing Spotify","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1162193437","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"Antitrust chief to hold Brussels press conference later Friday\nEU will ramp up antitrust probe with ","content":"<ul>\n <li>Antitrust chief to hold Brussels press conference later Friday</li>\n <li>EU will ramp up antitrust probe with statement of objections</li>\n</ul>\n<p>Apple Inc.&nbsp;is set for another showdown with the&nbsp;European Union’s antitrust chief as she escalates an antitrust probe over its App Store, more than four years after she ordered the company to pay billions of dollars in back-taxes.</p>\n<p>Margrethe Vestager, the EU’s antitrust chief, will speak at a press conference at 1 p.m. in Brussels, according to an email from the&nbsp;European Commission’s press office. She’s expected to explain why an EU investigation has found Apple abused its power over its App Store to unfairly squeeze music-streaming service&nbsp;Spotify Technology SA.</p>\n<p>Apple’s regulatory woes have intensified in recent months as software developers criticize the the levies Apple and&nbsp;Alphabet Inc.’s Google charge outside developers for using their digital distribution platforms. Companies that make apps&nbsp;urged&nbsp;the U.S. Senate last week to tackle Apple’s control over the App Store.</p>\n<p>Spotify complained in 2019 that Apple unfairly squeezes its music streaming service with ever-changing rules and a large sales commission on the app store. It has said it was forced to “artificially” increase monthly subscriptions for its premium service to cover the extra costs.</p>\n<p>The move to send Apple a so-called statement of objections raises the risk that the EU could order changes to its App Store or impose fines. Apple will have the chance to argue its case against any EU suspicions before regulators take a final decision. The EU has also been probing Apple over e-books and payments since last year.</p>\n<p>The EU and Apple are separately waging a legal battle over a 13 billion-euro ($15.7 billion) tax dispute after the company won a first judgment overturning a landmark 2016 order for it to pay extra tax. The EU had ruled Apple’s tax deals with Ireland illegal. Apple has said it always obeyed the law.</p>","source":"lsy1584095487587","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>EU’s Vestager Set to Accuse Apple of Unfairly Squeezing Spotify</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nEU’s Vestager Set to Accuse Apple of Unfairly Squeezing Spotify\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-04-30 16:34 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-04-30/eu-s-vestager-set-to-accuse-apple-of-unfairly-squeezing-spotify?srnd=markets-vp><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Antitrust chief to hold Brussels press conference later Friday\nEU will ramp up antitrust probe with statement of objections\n\nApple Inc. is set for another showdown with the European Union’s antitrust ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-04-30/eu-s-vestager-set-to-accuse-apple-of-unfairly-squeezing-spotify?srnd=markets-vp\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果","SPOT":"Spotify Technology S.A."},"source_url":"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-04-30/eu-s-vestager-set-to-accuse-apple-of-unfairly-squeezing-spotify?srnd=markets-vp","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1162193437","content_text":"Antitrust chief to hold Brussels press conference later Friday\nEU will ramp up antitrust probe with statement of objections\n\nApple Inc. is set for another showdown with the European Union’s antitrust chief as she escalates an antitrust probe over its App Store, more than four years after she ordered the company to pay billions of dollars in back-taxes.\nMargrethe Vestager, the EU’s antitrust chief, will speak at a press conference at 1 p.m. in Brussels, according to an email from the European Commission’s press office. She’s expected to explain why an EU investigation has found Apple abused its power over its App Store to unfairly squeeze music-streaming service Spotify Technology SA.\nApple’s regulatory woes have intensified in recent months as software developers criticize the the levies Apple and Alphabet Inc.’s Google charge outside developers for using their digital distribution platforms. Companies that make apps urged the U.S. Senate last week to tackle Apple’s control over the App Store.\nSpotify complained in 2019 that Apple unfairly squeezes its music streaming service with ever-changing rules and a large sales commission on the app store. It has said it was forced to “artificially” increase monthly subscriptions for its premium service to cover the extra costs.\nThe move to send Apple a so-called statement of objections raises the risk that the EU could order changes to its App Store or impose fines. Apple will have the chance to argue its case against any EU suspicions before regulators take a final decision. The EU has also been probing Apple over e-books and payments since last year.\nThe EU and Apple are separately waging a legal battle over a 13 billion-euro ($15.7 billion) tax dispute after the company won a first judgment overturning a landmark 2016 order for it to pay extra tax. The EU had ruled Apple’s tax deals with Ireland illegal. Apple has said it always obeyed the law.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":47,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":109027388,"gmtCreate":1619655814144,"gmtModify":1704727422820,"author":{"id":"3557272953214384","authorId":"3557272953214384","name":"WGSsss","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c859daf551024a3f95b178c72e1b8354","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3557272953214384","authorIdStr":"3557272953214384"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"like and comment pls","listText":"like and comment pls","text":"like and comment pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/109027388","repostId":"1128956391","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":212,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":109024311,"gmtCreate":1619655764533,"gmtModify":1704727421044,"author":{"id":"3557272953214384","authorId":"3557272953214384","name":"WGSsss","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c859daf551024a3f95b178c72e1b8354","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3557272953214384","authorIdStr":"3557272953214384"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Great ariticle, would you like to share it?","listText":"Great ariticle, would you like to share it?","text":"Great ariticle, would you like to share it?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/109024311","repostId":"1143886146","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1143886146","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1619654207,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1143886146?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-04-29 07:56","market":"us","language":"en","title":"ServiceNow Stock Falls As Earnings Beat But Large Deal Growth Slows","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1143886146","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"ServiceNow earnings and revenue for the March quarter topped Wall Street estimates on Wednesday. But","content":"<p>ServiceNow earnings and revenue for the March quarter topped Wall Street estimates on Wednesday. But ServiceNow stock fell as the enterprise software maker added fewer big contracts than the previous quarter as the coronavirus outbreak continues.</p>\n<p>Santa Clara, Calif-based&nbsp;ServiceNow said first-quarter earnings climbed 45% from a year earlier to $1.52 an adjusted share. Revenue rose 30% to $1.36 billion, the software maker said.</p>\n<p>A year earlier, ServiceNow earned $1.05 a share on sales of $1.05 billion. Analysts expected ServiceNow earnings of $1.34 a share on revenue of $1.34 billion for the period ended March 31.</p>\n<p>In addition, ServiceNow said subscription revenue rose 30% to $1.29 billion, topping estimates of $1.28 billion. In a release, ServiceNow said it will provide guidance on its earnings call with analysts.</p>\n<p>ServiceNow stock fell 7.2% to 517 in after-hours trading on the&nbsp;stock market today. Heading into the ServiceNow earnings report, the software stock had forged a&nbsp;cup-with-handle entry point&nbsp;of 560.89.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/dc12d9c463057bf06f91810b0e475dfd\" tg-width=\"1302\" tg-height=\"833\"></p>\n<p><b>ServiceNow Stock Adds Fewer High Spending Customers</b></p>\n<p>Amid the coronavirus lockdown, ServiceNow said it added 53 deals with more than $1 million in net new annual contract value in the March quarter. In the December quarter, it added 89 similar contracts with high-spending customers. ServiceNow had 1,146 customers with over $1 million in annual contract value as of March 31, up 23% from a year earlier.</p>\n<p>In addition, ServiceNow said current remaining performance obligations, or contract revenue that will be recognized as revenue in the next 12 months, was $4.4 billion as of March 31, representing 33% year-over-year growth.</p>\n<p>Analysts say demand in financial services, health care and government agencies has been a bright spot.</p>\n<p>The company's software tracks and manages services provided by information-technology departments. Its self-service tech portal enables company employees to access administrative and workflow tools.</p>\n<p>Further, ServiceNow has expanded from its core business into software for human resources, customer service management and security.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>ServiceNow Stock Falls As Earnings Beat But Large Deal Growth Slows</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nServiceNow Stock Falls As Earnings Beat But Large Deal Growth Slows\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-04-29 07:56</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>ServiceNow earnings and revenue for the March quarter topped Wall Street estimates on Wednesday. But ServiceNow stock fell as the enterprise software maker added fewer big contracts than the previous quarter as the coronavirus outbreak continues.</p>\n<p>Santa Clara, Calif-based&nbsp;ServiceNow said first-quarter earnings climbed 45% from a year earlier to $1.52 an adjusted share. Revenue rose 30% to $1.36 billion, the software maker said.</p>\n<p>A year earlier, ServiceNow earned $1.05 a share on sales of $1.05 billion. Analysts expected ServiceNow earnings of $1.34 a share on revenue of $1.34 billion for the period ended March 31.</p>\n<p>In addition, ServiceNow said subscription revenue rose 30% to $1.29 billion, topping estimates of $1.28 billion. In a release, ServiceNow said it will provide guidance on its earnings call with analysts.</p>\n<p>ServiceNow stock fell 7.2% to 517 in after-hours trading on the&nbsp;stock market today. Heading into the ServiceNow earnings report, the software stock had forged a&nbsp;cup-with-handle entry point&nbsp;of 560.89.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/dc12d9c463057bf06f91810b0e475dfd\" tg-width=\"1302\" tg-height=\"833\"></p>\n<p><b>ServiceNow Stock Adds Fewer High Spending Customers</b></p>\n<p>Amid the coronavirus lockdown, ServiceNow said it added 53 deals with more than $1 million in net new annual contract value in the March quarter. In the December quarter, it added 89 similar contracts with high-spending customers. ServiceNow had 1,146 customers with over $1 million in annual contract value as of March 31, up 23% from a year earlier.</p>\n<p>In addition, ServiceNow said current remaining performance obligations, or contract revenue that will be recognized as revenue in the next 12 months, was $4.4 billion as of March 31, representing 33% year-over-year growth.</p>\n<p>Analysts say demand in financial services, health care and government agencies has been a bright spot.</p>\n<p>The company's software tracks and manages services provided by information-technology departments. Its self-service tech portal enables company employees to access administrative and workflow tools.</p>\n<p>Further, ServiceNow has expanded from its core business into software for human resources, customer service management and security.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NOW":"ServiceNow"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1143886146","content_text":"ServiceNow earnings and revenue for the March quarter topped Wall Street estimates on Wednesday. But ServiceNow stock fell as the enterprise software maker added fewer big contracts than the previous quarter as the coronavirus outbreak continues.\nSanta Clara, Calif-based ServiceNow said first-quarter earnings climbed 45% from a year earlier to $1.52 an adjusted share. Revenue rose 30% to $1.36 billion, the software maker said.\nA year earlier, ServiceNow earned $1.05 a share on sales of $1.05 billion. Analysts expected ServiceNow earnings of $1.34 a share on revenue of $1.34 billion for the period ended March 31.\nIn addition, ServiceNow said subscription revenue rose 30% to $1.29 billion, topping estimates of $1.28 billion. In a release, ServiceNow said it will provide guidance on its earnings call with analysts.\nServiceNow stock fell 7.2% to 517 in after-hours trading on the stock market today. Heading into the ServiceNow earnings report, the software stock had forged a cup-with-handle entry point of 560.89.\n\nServiceNow Stock Adds Fewer High Spending Customers\nAmid the coronavirus lockdown, ServiceNow said it added 53 deals with more than $1 million in net new annual contract value in the March quarter. In the December quarter, it added 89 similar contracts with high-spending customers. ServiceNow had 1,146 customers with over $1 million in annual contract value as of March 31, up 23% from a year earlier.\nIn addition, ServiceNow said current remaining performance obligations, or contract revenue that will be recognized as revenue in the next 12 months, was $4.4 billion as of March 31, representing 33% year-over-year growth.\nAnalysts say demand in financial services, health care and government agencies has been a bright spot.\nThe company's software tracks and manages services provided by information-technology departments. Its self-service tech portal enables company employees to access administrative and workflow tools.\nFurther, ServiceNow has expanded from its core business into software for human resources, customer service management and security.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":85,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":100341791,"gmtCreate":1619584247013,"gmtModify":1704726356958,"author":{"id":"3557272953214384","authorId":"3557272953214384","name":"WGSsss","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c859daf551024a3f95b178c72e1b8354","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3557272953214384","authorIdStr":"3557272953214384"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/100341791","repostId":"1138757588","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1138757588","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1619579490,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1138757588?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-04-28 11:11","market":"hk","language":"en","title":"Reporting Deadline Looms for Scores of Hong Kong-Listed Firms","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1138757588","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"Halted ahead of deadline are 44 companies worth $19 billion\nSuspended companies risk losing index me","content":"<ul>\n <li>Halted ahead of deadline are 44 companies worth $19 billion</li>\n <li>Suspended companies risk losing index membership: analysts</li>\n</ul>\n<p>The clock is ticking for scores of Hong Kong-listed companies that look like they will miss a deadline to post their 2020 earnings reports.</p>\n<p>Mainland solar power maker&nbsp;GCL-Poly Energy Holdings Ltd.&nbsp;and Hainan Meilan International Airport Co., which operates an airport in China’s southernmost Hainan province, are among the more-than-40 Hong Kong-listed companies that are just days away from missing final deadlines to report their 2020 results.</p>\n<p>If they fail to meet the April 30 deadline, some of these 44 companies -- with a combined market value of HK$146.8 billion ($18.9 billion) -- risk losing key index membership status, according to analysts.</p>\n<p>At the very least, these Chinese companies will raise investor concerns about their financial health. They are already part of a slew suspended when they missed an earlier March 31 deadline for preliminary earnings.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/af5f7d78698e711235ea936b0ea24f73\" tg-width=\"944\" tg-height=\"581\"></p>\n<p>“Of course, investors in these stocks are worried about their financial situation,” said Louis Tse, Hong Kong-based managing director at VC Asset Management Ltd. “It’s difficult for their auditors to get enough information to form an opinion,” he added, saying the pandemic made it tough for auditors to travel and verify information in person, for instance.</p>\n<p>Unpaid debt or weak corporate governance could also be blamed for delayed audit reports, he said.</p>\n<p>Of the morethan 50 companies&nbsp;that missed the March 31 deadline for preliminary reporting, just seven have ended up releasing reports. Among them, mobile technology firm China Baoli Technologies Holdings Ltd. has halved since it resumed trading, while computer hardware firm Jiangsu Nandasoft Technology Co is down 24%.</p>\n<p>GCL-Poly Energy, Hainan Meilan International Airport and Asia Cement China Holdings Corp. are among the biggest of the 44 to have been suspended for failing to report on time. All three have said their auditors need more time to sign off on the results.</p>\n<p>China Huarong Asset Management Co Ltd., the embattled state-owned bad debt manager that recently faced a&nbsp;meltdown in its bonds, is the second-biggest among the halted companies. It had said it won’t report its earnings by the April 30 deadline, and was delaying its 2020 earnings because its auditors needed more time to finalize an unspecified transaction.</p>\n<p>In each of the past four years, no more than 10 companies have delayed their annual earnings reports. Numbers were small for delays even last year, when the pandemic disrupted business activities and in 2019 -- a year of&nbsp;pro-democracy protests&nbsp;in Hong Kong.</p>\n<p>Long-term trading suspensions by companies that fail to report their earnings on time have exposed problematic companies in the past. China Huiyuan Juice Group Ltd., once one of the nation’s biggest juice companies, had been suspended from trading from April 2018 after it failed to submit its 2017 results on time. The company was delisted in January this year.</p>\n<p>Kenny Wen, strategist at Everbright Sun Hung Kai Co., said there is a risk that some index compilers might review and remove shares that have been suspended for too long. Huarong is a member of the MSCI Emerging Markets Index, while both Huarong and GCL are in the Hang Seng Composite Index.</p>\n<p>“If index compilers remove stocks like Huarong from their indexes when these companies are suspended, there could be selling pressure when they resume trading,” Wen said.</p>\n<p>The Hong Kong stock exchange delists companies that have been suspended from trading for 18 months, although the firm can appeal in that period and actual delistings tend to be rare.</p>","source":"lsy1584095487587","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Reporting Deadline Looms for Scores of Hong Kong-Listed Firms</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nReporting Deadline Looms for Scores of Hong Kong-Listed Firms\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-04-28 11:11 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-04-28/reporting-deadline-looms-for-scores-of-hong-kong-listed-firms?srnd=premium-asia><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Halted ahead of deadline are 44 companies worth $19 billion\nSuspended companies risk losing index membership: analysts\n\nThe clock is ticking for scores of Hong Kong-listed companies that look like ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-04-28/reporting-deadline-looms-for-scores-of-hong-kong-listed-firms?srnd=premium-asia\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"HSCEI":"国企指数","HSTECH":"恒生科技指数","HSI":"恒生指数","HSCCI":"红筹指数"},"source_url":"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-04-28/reporting-deadline-looms-for-scores-of-hong-kong-listed-firms?srnd=premium-asia","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1138757588","content_text":"Halted ahead of deadline are 44 companies worth $19 billion\nSuspended companies risk losing index membership: analysts\n\nThe clock is ticking for scores of Hong Kong-listed companies that look like they will miss a deadline to post their 2020 earnings reports.\nMainland solar power maker GCL-Poly Energy Holdings Ltd. and Hainan Meilan International Airport Co., which operates an airport in China’s southernmost Hainan province, are among the more-than-40 Hong Kong-listed companies that are just days away from missing final deadlines to report their 2020 results.\nIf they fail to meet the April 30 deadline, some of these 44 companies -- with a combined market value of HK$146.8 billion ($18.9 billion) -- risk losing key index membership status, according to analysts.\nAt the very least, these Chinese companies will raise investor concerns about their financial health. They are already part of a slew suspended when they missed an earlier March 31 deadline for preliminary earnings.\n\n“Of course, investors in these stocks are worried about their financial situation,” said Louis Tse, Hong Kong-based managing director at VC Asset Management Ltd. “It’s difficult for their auditors to get enough information to form an opinion,” he added, saying the pandemic made it tough for auditors to travel and verify information in person, for instance.\nUnpaid debt or weak corporate governance could also be blamed for delayed audit reports, he said.\nOf the morethan 50 companies that missed the March 31 deadline for preliminary reporting, just seven have ended up releasing reports. Among them, mobile technology firm China Baoli Technologies Holdings Ltd. has halved since it resumed trading, while computer hardware firm Jiangsu Nandasoft Technology Co is down 24%.\nGCL-Poly Energy, Hainan Meilan International Airport and Asia Cement China Holdings Corp. are among the biggest of the 44 to have been suspended for failing to report on time. All three have said their auditors need more time to sign off on the results.\nChina Huarong Asset Management Co Ltd., the embattled state-owned bad debt manager that recently faced a meltdown in its bonds, is the second-biggest among the halted companies. It had said it won’t report its earnings by the April 30 deadline, and was delaying its 2020 earnings because its auditors needed more time to finalize an unspecified transaction.\nIn each of the past four years, no more than 10 companies have delayed their annual earnings reports. Numbers were small for delays even last year, when the pandemic disrupted business activities and in 2019 -- a year of pro-democracy protests in Hong Kong.\nLong-term trading suspensions by companies that fail to report their earnings on time have exposed problematic companies in the past. China Huiyuan Juice Group Ltd., once one of the nation’s biggest juice companies, had been suspended from trading from April 2018 after it failed to submit its 2017 results on time. The company was delisted in January this year.\nKenny Wen, strategist at Everbright Sun Hung Kai Co., said there is a risk that some index compilers might review and remove shares that have been suspended for too long. Huarong is a member of the MSCI Emerging Markets Index, while both Huarong and GCL are in the Hang Seng Composite Index.\n“If index compilers remove stocks like Huarong from their indexes when these companies are suspended, there could be selling pressure when they resume trading,” Wen said.\nThe Hong Kong stock exchange delists companies that have been suspended from trading for 18 months, although the firm can appeal in that period and actual delistings tend to be rare.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":162,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":374743499,"gmtCreate":1619482507111,"gmtModify":1704724571689,"author":{"id":"3557272953214384","authorId":"3557272953214384","name":"WGSsss","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c859daf551024a3f95b178c72e1b8354","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3557272953214384","authorIdStr":"3557272953214384"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/374743499","repostId":"1117140629","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":98,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":374003855,"gmtCreate":1619399911977,"gmtModify":1704723209823,"author":{"id":"3557272953214384","authorId":"3557272953214384","name":"WGSsss","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c859daf551024a3f95b178c72e1b8354","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3557272953214384","authorIdStr":"3557272953214384"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"good","listText":"good","text":"good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/374003855","repostId":"1155008857","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1155008857","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1619399210,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1155008857?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-04-26 09:06","market":"sg","language":"en","title":"Hong Kong-Singapore Air Travel Bubble to Start on May 26","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1155008857","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"Agreement will allow quarantine-free travel between two hubs\nOriginal announcement last week cancele","content":"<ul>\n <li>Agreement will allow quarantine-free travel between two hubs</li>\n <li>Original announcement last week canceled by Singapore</li>\n</ul>\n<p>Hong Kong and Singapore will announce a start to their highly anticipated two-way air travel bubble as soon as Monday, according to people familiar with the matter, after multiple delays.</p>\n<p>Flights under the agreement -- which allows people to travel quarantine free between the financial hubs -- will begin from May 26, said the people, who asked not to be identified as they’re not authorized to speak publicly. The number of flights will be increased by June 26 if there aren’t further outbreaks in either city, one of the people said.</p>\n<p>Hong Kong and Singapore have been working on the creation of a travel corridor for months after plans for a November start were&nbsp;shelved&nbsp;due to a virus flareup in the Chinese territory. A plan to announce its revival last week was also&nbsp;canceled&nbsp;at the last minute by the Singapore side, people familiar with the matter said at the time.</p>\n<p>The Hong Kong government said a discussion with Singapore on the re-launch “is at an advance stage and the government will make announcement as soon as practicable.” Singapore’s transport ministry referred Bloomberg News to its most recent&nbsp;press release&nbsp;on the matter. Singapore last week said the two cities had not fixed a date to announce the resumption of the bubble, but “will do so once we are ready, hopefully very soon.”</p>\n<p>While Covid-19 cases in the two places pale in comparison to many countries, strict requirements for the bubble to open meant outbreaks that would be regarded&nbsp;as small elsewhere&nbsp;were enough to halt progress.</p>\n<p>Virus flareups in Hong Kong were the main reason for the months of delays. Now, after stemming a March outbreak centered on a gym, Hong Kong has been reporting only a handful of new infections a day, or low double-digits at most. Chief Executive Carrie Lam said on April 12 that the virus was “obviously contained” in the city and encouraged more people to get vaccinated,dangling the prospect&nbsp;of looser rules on social distancing for those who were inoculated. Singapore averaged two new cases per week recently.</p>\n<p>Sporadic outbreaks also complicated a travel bubble between Australia and New Zealand. After many months in the making, a quarantine-free flight corridor between those two countries -- which have largely eliminated the virus due to strict border curbs -- opened on April 19.</p>\n<p>The Hong Kong-Singapore agreement should unleash a torrent of pent-up demand from people eager to fly overseas and potentially do business in person after more than a year of the pandemic, though it is unclear yet the limited number of flights or seats that will be made available. The desire to travel in any way possible is reflected in the popularity of so-called&nbsp;cruises to nowhere&nbsp;in Singapore and tickets selling out for gimmicky dinners on parked aircraft.</p>\n<p>Under previous travel bubble plans, flights will be operated by&nbsp;Singapore Airlines Ltd.&nbsp;and&nbsp;Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd.The two airlines have been&nbsp;hammered&nbsp;by Covid-19 as they don’t have domestic markets to compensate for a near-total collapse in international travel. Latest data show Cathay flew just 598 passengers a day on average in March as it operated a&nbsp;skeleton schedule&nbsp;to only 18 destinations. Singapore Airlines’ numbers are also just a tiny fraction of pre-pandemic levels.</p>","source":"lsy1584095487587","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Hong Kong-Singapore Air Travel Bubble to Start on May 26</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHong Kong-Singapore Air Travel Bubble to Start on May 26\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-04-26 09:06 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-04-25/hong-kong-singapore-air-travel-bubble-said-to-start-on-may-26><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Agreement will allow quarantine-free travel between two hubs\nOriginal announcement last week canceled by Singapore\n\nHong Kong and Singapore will announce a start to their highly anticipated two-way ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-04-25/hong-kong-singapore-air-travel-bubble-said-to-start-on-may-26\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"00293":"国泰航空","C6L.SI":"新加坡航空公司"},"source_url":"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-04-25/hong-kong-singapore-air-travel-bubble-said-to-start-on-may-26","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1155008857","content_text":"Agreement will allow quarantine-free travel between two hubs\nOriginal announcement last week canceled by Singapore\n\nHong Kong and Singapore will announce a start to their highly anticipated two-way air travel bubble as soon as Monday, according to people familiar with the matter, after multiple delays.\nFlights under the agreement -- which allows people to travel quarantine free between the financial hubs -- will begin from May 26, said the people, who asked not to be identified as they’re not authorized to speak publicly. The number of flights will be increased by June 26 if there aren’t further outbreaks in either city, one of the people said.\nHong Kong and Singapore have been working on the creation of a travel corridor for months after plans for a November start were shelved due to a virus flareup in the Chinese territory. A plan to announce its revival last week was also canceled at the last minute by the Singapore side, people familiar with the matter said at the time.\nThe Hong Kong government said a discussion with Singapore on the re-launch “is at an advance stage and the government will make announcement as soon as practicable.” Singapore’s transport ministry referred Bloomberg News to its most recent press release on the matter. Singapore last week said the two cities had not fixed a date to announce the resumption of the bubble, but “will do so once we are ready, hopefully very soon.”\nWhile Covid-19 cases in the two places pale in comparison to many countries, strict requirements for the bubble to open meant outbreaks that would be regarded as small elsewhere were enough to halt progress.\nVirus flareups in Hong Kong were the main reason for the months of delays. Now, after stemming a March outbreak centered on a gym, Hong Kong has been reporting only a handful of new infections a day, or low double-digits at most. Chief Executive Carrie Lam said on April 12 that the virus was “obviously contained” in the city and encouraged more people to get vaccinated,dangling the prospect of looser rules on social distancing for those who were inoculated. Singapore averaged two new cases per week recently.\nSporadic outbreaks also complicated a travel bubble between Australia and New Zealand. After many months in the making, a quarantine-free flight corridor between those two countries -- which have largely eliminated the virus due to strict border curbs -- opened on April 19.\nThe Hong Kong-Singapore agreement should unleash a torrent of pent-up demand from people eager to fly overseas and potentially do business in person after more than a year of the pandemic, though it is unclear yet the limited number of flights or seats that will be made available. The desire to travel in any way possible is reflected in the popularity of so-called cruises to nowhere in Singapore and tickets selling out for gimmicky dinners on parked aircraft.\nUnder previous travel bubble plans, flights will be operated by Singapore Airlines Ltd. and Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd.The two airlines have been hammered by Covid-19 as they don’t have domestic markets to compensate for a near-total collapse in international travel. Latest data show Cathay flew just 598 passengers a day on average in March as it operated a skeleton schedule to only 18 destinations. Singapore Airlines’ numbers are also just a tiny fraction of pre-pandemic levels.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":126,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":165723580,"gmtCreate":1624158442640,"gmtModify":1703829738453,"author":{"id":"3557272953214384","authorId":"3557272953214384","name":"WGSsss","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c859daf551024a3f95b178c72e1b8354","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3557272953214384","authorIdStr":"3557272953214384"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"It Worth to have a look. Please like and comment&nbsp;","listText":"It Worth to have a look. Please like and comment&nbsp;","text":"It Worth to have a look. Please like and comment","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":2,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":14,"commentSize":68,"repostSize":1,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/165723580","repostId":"1133385197","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1133385197","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1624151969,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1133385197?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-20 09:19","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Answering the great inflation question of our time","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1133385197","media":"finance.yahoo","summary":"Prices of everything; a house in Phoenix, a Ford F-150, a plane ticket to New York, have all gone up","content":"<p>Prices of everything; a house in Phoenix, a Ford F-150, a plane ticket to New York, have all gone up. That much is true.</p>\n<p>Unfortunately pretty much everything else about inflation—a red hot topic these days—is conjecture. And that’s vexing, not just for the dismal scientists (aka economists), but for all of us, because whether or not prices are really rising, by how much and for how long, has massive implications in our lives. Or as Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody’s Analytics, says: “Inflation is one of the mysteries of economic study and thought. A difficult thing to gauge and forecast and get right. That’s why the risks are high.”</p>\n<p>The current debate over inflation really revolves around two questions: First, is this current spate of inflation, just that, a spate—or to use Wall Street’s buzzword of the moment, “transitory,”—or not? (Just to give you an idea of how buzzy, when I Google the word “transitory” the search engine suggests “inflation” after it.) And second, transitory (aka temporary) inflation or not, what does it suggest for the economy and markets?</p>\n<p>Before I get into that, let me lay out what’s going on with prices right now. First, know that inflation,which peaked in 1980 at an annualized rate of 13.55%,has been tame for quite some time, specifically 4% or less for nearly 30 years. Which means that anyone 40 years old or younger has no experience with inflation other than maybe from an Econ 101 textbook. Obviously that could be a problem.</p>\n<p>As an aside I remember President Ford in 1974 trying to jawbone inflation down with his \"Whip Inflation Now\" campaign, which featured“Win” buttons,earringsand evenugly sweaters.None of this worked and it took draconian measures by Fed Chair Paul Volcker (raising rates and targeting money supply,as described by Former President of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, William Poole)to eventually tame inflation and keep it under wraps for all those years.</p>\n<p>Until now perhaps. Last week theLabor Department reported that consumer prices (the CPI, or consumer price index) rose 5% in May,the fastest annual rate in nearly 13 years—which was when the economy was overheating from the housing boom which subsequently went bust and sent the economy off a cliff and into the Great Recession. Core inflation, which excludes volatile food and energy prices, was up 3.8%, the biggest increase since May 1992. (For the record, the likelihood of the economy tanking right now is de minimis.)</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/87f75dfcb98fb5a0e7c3f9d3f8d336e2\" tg-width=\"705\" tg-height=\"412\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>Used car and truck prices are a major driver of inflation, climbing 7.3% last month and 29.7% over the past year. New car prices are up too, which have pushed upshares of Ford and GM a remarkable 40% plus this year.Clearly Americans want to buy vehicles to go on vacation and get back to work. And Yahoo Finance’sJanna Herron reportsthat rents are rising at their fastest pace in 15 years.</p>\n<p>To be sure, not all prices are climbing.As Yahoo Finance’s Rick Newman points out,prices are not up much at all for health care, education and are basically flat for technology, including computers, smartphones and internet service (an important point which we’ll get back to.)</p>\n<p>But that’s the counterpoint really. Americans are obsessed with cars, housing is critical and many of us are experiencing sticker shock booking travel this summer. Higher prices are front and center. Wall Street too is in a tizzy about inflation, and concerns about it and more importantly Federal Reserve policy in response to inflation (see below), sent stocks lower with the S&amp;P 500 down 1.91% this week, its worst week since February.</p>\n<p>Given this backdrop, the tension (such as it is) was high when the Fed met this week to deliver its forecast and for Chair Jay Powell to answer questions from the media. Or at least so said hedge fund honcho Paul Tudor Jones,who characterized the proceedings on CNBCas “the most important meeting in [Chairman] Jay Powell’s career, certainly the most important Fed meeting of the past four or five years.” Jones was critical of the Fed, which he believes is now stimulating the economy unnecessarily by keeping interest rates low and by buying financial assets. Unnecessarily, Jones says, because the economy is already running hot and needs no support. The Fed (which is in the transitory camp when it comes to inflation) risks overheating the economy by creating runaway inflation, according to PTJ.</p>\n<p>Now I don’t see eye to eye with Jones on this, though I should point out, he's a billionaire from investing in financial markets, and let’s just say I’m not. I should also point out that Jones, 66, is in fact old enough to remember inflation, never mind that as a young man he called the 1987 stock market crash. So we should all ignore Jones at our peril.</p>\n<p>As for what the Fed put forth this past Wednesday, well it wasn’t much, signaling an expectation ofraising interest rates twice by the end of 2023(yes, that is down the road.) And Powell, who’s become much more adept at not rippling the waters these days after some rougher forays earlier in his tenure, didn’t drop any bombshells in the presser.</p>\n<p>Which brings us to the question of why the Federal Reserve isn’t so concerned about inflation and thinks it is mostly—here’s that word again—transitory. To answer that, we need to first address why prices are rising right now, which can be summed up in one very familiar abbreviation: COVID-19. When COVID hit last spring the economy collapsed, which crushed demand in sectors like leisure, travel and retail. Now the economy is roaring back to life and businesses can raise prices, certainly over 2020 levels.</p>\n<p>“We clearly should’ve expected it,” says William Spriggs, chief economist at the AFL-CIO and a professor of economics at Howard University. “You can’t shut down the economy and think you turn on the switch [without some inflation].”</p>\n<p>“We had a pandemic that forced an artificial shutdown of the economy in a way that even the collapse of the financial system and the housing market didn’t, and we had a snapback at a rate we’ve never seen before—not because of the fundamentals driving recovery but because of government,” says Joel Naroff, president and chief economist of Naroff Economics.</p>\n<p>COVID had other secondary effects on the economy though, besides just ultimately producing a snapback. For one thing, the pandemic throttled supply chains, specifically the shipping of parts and components from one part of the globe to another. It also confused managers about how much to produce and therefore how many parts to order.</p>\n<p>A prime example here is what happened to the chip (semiconductor) and auto industrieswhich I wrote about last month.Car makers thought no one would buy vehicles during the pandemic and pared back their orders with chipmakers, (which were having a tough time shipping their chips anyway.) Turned out the car guys were wrong, millions of people wanted cars and trucks, but the automakers didn’t have enough chips for their cars and had to curb production. Fewer vehicles and strong demand led to higher new car prices, which cascaded to used car prices then to car rental rates. Net net, all the friction and slowness of getting things delivered now adds to costs which causes companies to raise prices.</p>\n<p>Another secondary effect of COVID which has been inflationary comes from employment,which I got into a bit last week.We all know millions were thrown out of work by COVID last year, many of whom were backstopped by government payments that could add up to $600 a week (state and federal.) These folks have been none too keen on coming back to work for minimum wage, or $290 a week. So to lure them back employers are having to pay more, which puts more money in people's pockets which allows stores for example to raise prices.</p>\n<p><b>Anti-inflation forces</b></p>\n<p>But here’s the big-time question: If COVID was temporary, and therefore its effects are temporary and inflation is one of its effects then doesn’t it follow, ipso facto, that inflation is (OK I’ll say it again), transitory?</p>\n<p>I say yes, (with a bit of a caveat.) And most economists, like Claudia Sahm, a senior fellow at the Jain Family Institute and a former Federal Reserve economist, agree. “‘Transitory’ has become a buzzword,” she says. “It is important to be more concrete about what we mean by that. We’re probably going to see in the next few months inflation numbers that are bigger than average, but as long as they keep stepping down, that’s the sign of it being transitory. If we didn’t see any sign of inflation stepping down some, it would’ve started feeling like ‘Houston, we have a problem.’”</p>\n<p>To buttress my argument beyond that above \"if-then\" syllogism, let’s take a look at why inflation has been so low for the past three decades.</p>\n<p>To me this is mostly obvious. Prices have been tamped down by the greatest anti-inflation force of our lifetime, that being technology, specifically the explosion of consumer technology. Think about it. The first wave of technology, a good example would be IBM mainframes, saved big companies money in back-office functions, savings which they mostly kept for themselves (higher profits) and their shareholders. But the four great landmark events in the advent of consumer technology; the introduction ofthe PC in 1974 (MITS Altair),the Netscape IPO of 1995,Google search in 1998,and the launch of theiPhone in 2007(I remember Steve Jobs demoing it to me like it was yesterday), greatly accelerated, broadened and deepened this deflationary trend.</p>\n<p>Not only has technology been pushing down the cost of everything from drilling for oil, to manufacturing clothes to farming, and allowing for the creation of groundbreaking (and deflationary) competitors like Uber, Airbnb and Netflix, but it also let consumers find—on their phones—the most affordable trip to Hawaii, the least expensive haircut or the best deal on Nikes.</p>\n<p>So technology has reduced the cost of almost everything and will continue to do so the rest of our lifetime. Bottom line: Unless something terrible happens, the power of technology will outweigh and outlive COVID.</p>\n<p>There is one mitigating factor and that is globalism, which is connected to both technology and COVID. Let me briefly explain.</p>\n<p>After World War II, most of humanity has become more and more connected in terms of trade, communication, travel, etc. (See supply chain above.) Technology of course was a major enabler here; better ships, planes and faster internet, all of which as it grew more potent, accelerated globalism. Another element was the introduction of political constructs like the World Trade Organization and NAFTA. (I think of the Clinton administration andChina joining the WTO in 2001as perhaps the high-water marks of globalization.)</p>\n<p>Like its technological cousin, globalism has deflationary effects particularly on the labor front as companies could more and more easily find lowest cost countries to produce goods and source materials. And like technology, globalization seemed inexorable, which it was, until it wasn’t. Political winds, manifested by the likes of Brexit and leaders like Putin, Xi Jinping, Erdogan, Bolsonaro, Duterte and of course Donald Trump have caused globalism to wane and anti-globalism and nationalism to wax.</p>\n<p>The internet too, once seen as only a great connector, has also become a global divider, as the world increasingly fractures into Chinese, U.S. and European walled digital zones when it comes to social media and search for example. Security risks, privacy, spying and hacking of course divide us further here too.</p>\n<p>So technology, which had made globalism stronger and stronger, now also makes it weaker and weaker.</p>\n<p>COVID plays a role in rethinking globalism as it exposes vulnerabilities in the supply chain. Companies that were rethinking their manufacturing in China but considering another country, are now wondering if it just makes sense to repatriate the whole shebang. Supply chains that were optimized for cost only are being rethought with security and reliability being factored in and that costs money.</p>\n<p>How significant is this decline in globalization and how permanent is it? Good questions. But my point here is whether or not \"globalism disrupted\" is transitory (!) or not, it could push prices up, (in the short and intermediate run at least), as cost is sacrificed for predictability. Longer term I say Americans are a resourceful people. We’ll figure out how to make cost effective stuff in the U.S. It’s also likely that globalism will trend upward again, though perhaps not as unfettered as it once was.</p>\n<p>More downward pressure on pricing could come from shifts in employment practices. Mark Zandi points out that “the work-from-anywhere dynamic could depress wage growth and prices. If I don’t need to work in New York anymore and could live in Tampa, it stands to reason my wage could get cut or I won’t get the same wage increase in the future.”</p>\n<p>And so what is Zandi’s take on transitory? “What we’re observing now is prices going back to pre-pandemic,” he says. “The price spikes we’re experiencing now will continue for the next few months through summer but certainly by the end of year, this time next year, they will have disappeared. I do think underlying inflation will be higher post-pandemic than pre-pandemic, but that’s a feature not a bug.”</p>\n<p>I don’t disagree. To me it’s simple: The technology wave I’ve described above is bigger than COVID and bigger than the rise and fall of globalism. And that is why, ladies and gentlemen, I believe inflation will be transitory, certainly in the long run. (Though I’m well aware of whatJohn Maynard Keynes said about the long run.)</p>","source":"lsy1612507957220","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Answering the great inflation question of our time</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAnswering the great inflation question of our time\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-06-20 09:19 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/answering-the-great-inflation-question-of-our-time-114153460.html><strong>finance.yahoo</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Prices of everything; a house in Phoenix, a Ford F-150, a plane ticket to New York, have all gone up. That much is true.\nUnfortunately pretty much everything else about inflation—a red hot topic these...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/answering-the-great-inflation-question-of-our-time-114153460.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/answering-the-great-inflation-question-of-our-time-114153460.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1133385197","content_text":"Prices of everything; a house in Phoenix, a Ford F-150, a plane ticket to New York, have all gone up. That much is true.\nUnfortunately pretty much everything else about inflation—a red hot topic these days—is conjecture. And that’s vexing, not just for the dismal scientists (aka economists), but for all of us, because whether or not prices are really rising, by how much and for how long, has massive implications in our lives. Or as Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody’s Analytics, says: “Inflation is one of the mysteries of economic study and thought. A difficult thing to gauge and forecast and get right. That’s why the risks are high.”\nThe current debate over inflation really revolves around two questions: First, is this current spate of inflation, just that, a spate—or to use Wall Street’s buzzword of the moment, “transitory,”—or not? (Just to give you an idea of how buzzy, when I Google the word “transitory” the search engine suggests “inflation” after it.) And second, transitory (aka temporary) inflation or not, what does it suggest for the economy and markets?\nBefore I get into that, let me lay out what’s going on with prices right now. First, know that inflation,which peaked in 1980 at an annualized rate of 13.55%,has been tame for quite some time, specifically 4% or less for nearly 30 years. Which means that anyone 40 years old or younger has no experience with inflation other than maybe from an Econ 101 textbook. Obviously that could be a problem.\nAs an aside I remember President Ford in 1974 trying to jawbone inflation down with his \"Whip Inflation Now\" campaign, which featured“Win” buttons,earringsand evenugly sweaters.None of this worked and it took draconian measures by Fed Chair Paul Volcker (raising rates and targeting money supply,as described by Former President of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, William Poole)to eventually tame inflation and keep it under wraps for all those years.\nUntil now perhaps. Last week theLabor Department reported that consumer prices (the CPI, or consumer price index) rose 5% in May,the fastest annual rate in nearly 13 years—which was when the economy was overheating from the housing boom which subsequently went bust and sent the economy off a cliff and into the Great Recession. Core inflation, which excludes volatile food and energy prices, was up 3.8%, the biggest increase since May 1992. (For the record, the likelihood of the economy tanking right now is de minimis.)\n\nUsed car and truck prices are a major driver of inflation, climbing 7.3% last month and 29.7% over the past year. New car prices are up too, which have pushed upshares of Ford and GM a remarkable 40% plus this year.Clearly Americans want to buy vehicles to go on vacation and get back to work. And Yahoo Finance’sJanna Herron reportsthat rents are rising at their fastest pace in 15 years.\nTo be sure, not all prices are climbing.As Yahoo Finance’s Rick Newman points out,prices are not up much at all for health care, education and are basically flat for technology, including computers, smartphones and internet service (an important point which we’ll get back to.)\nBut that’s the counterpoint really. Americans are obsessed with cars, housing is critical and many of us are experiencing sticker shock booking travel this summer. Higher prices are front and center. Wall Street too is in a tizzy about inflation, and concerns about it and more importantly Federal Reserve policy in response to inflation (see below), sent stocks lower with the S&P 500 down 1.91% this week, its worst week since February.\nGiven this backdrop, the tension (such as it is) was high when the Fed met this week to deliver its forecast and for Chair Jay Powell to answer questions from the media. Or at least so said hedge fund honcho Paul Tudor Jones,who characterized the proceedings on CNBCas “the most important meeting in [Chairman] Jay Powell’s career, certainly the most important Fed meeting of the past four or five years.” Jones was critical of the Fed, which he believes is now stimulating the economy unnecessarily by keeping interest rates low and by buying financial assets. Unnecessarily, Jones says, because the economy is already running hot and needs no support. The Fed (which is in the transitory camp when it comes to inflation) risks overheating the economy by creating runaway inflation, according to PTJ.\nNow I don’t see eye to eye with Jones on this, though I should point out, he's a billionaire from investing in financial markets, and let’s just say I’m not. I should also point out that Jones, 66, is in fact old enough to remember inflation, never mind that as a young man he called the 1987 stock market crash. So we should all ignore Jones at our peril.\nAs for what the Fed put forth this past Wednesday, well it wasn’t much, signaling an expectation ofraising interest rates twice by the end of 2023(yes, that is down the road.) And Powell, who’s become much more adept at not rippling the waters these days after some rougher forays earlier in his tenure, didn’t drop any bombshells in the presser.\nWhich brings us to the question of why the Federal Reserve isn’t so concerned about inflation and thinks it is mostly—here’s that word again—transitory. To answer that, we need to first address why prices are rising right now, which can be summed up in one very familiar abbreviation: COVID-19. When COVID hit last spring the economy collapsed, which crushed demand in sectors like leisure, travel and retail. Now the economy is roaring back to life and businesses can raise prices, certainly over 2020 levels.\n“We clearly should’ve expected it,” says William Spriggs, chief economist at the AFL-CIO and a professor of economics at Howard University. “You can’t shut down the economy and think you turn on the switch [without some inflation].”\n“We had a pandemic that forced an artificial shutdown of the economy in a way that even the collapse of the financial system and the housing market didn’t, and we had a snapback at a rate we’ve never seen before—not because of the fundamentals driving recovery but because of government,” says Joel Naroff, president and chief economist of Naroff Economics.\nCOVID had other secondary effects on the economy though, besides just ultimately producing a snapback. For one thing, the pandemic throttled supply chains, specifically the shipping of parts and components from one part of the globe to another. It also confused managers about how much to produce and therefore how many parts to order.\nA prime example here is what happened to the chip (semiconductor) and auto industrieswhich I wrote about last month.Car makers thought no one would buy vehicles during the pandemic and pared back their orders with chipmakers, (which were having a tough time shipping their chips anyway.) Turned out the car guys were wrong, millions of people wanted cars and trucks, but the automakers didn’t have enough chips for their cars and had to curb production. Fewer vehicles and strong demand led to higher new car prices, which cascaded to used car prices then to car rental rates. Net net, all the friction and slowness of getting things delivered now adds to costs which causes companies to raise prices.\nAnother secondary effect of COVID which has been inflationary comes from employment,which I got into a bit last week.We all know millions were thrown out of work by COVID last year, many of whom were backstopped by government payments that could add up to $600 a week (state and federal.) These folks have been none too keen on coming back to work for minimum wage, or $290 a week. So to lure them back employers are having to pay more, which puts more money in people's pockets which allows stores for example to raise prices.\nAnti-inflation forces\nBut here’s the big-time question: If COVID was temporary, and therefore its effects are temporary and inflation is one of its effects then doesn’t it follow, ipso facto, that inflation is (OK I’ll say it again), transitory?\nI say yes, (with a bit of a caveat.) And most economists, like Claudia Sahm, a senior fellow at the Jain Family Institute and a former Federal Reserve economist, agree. “‘Transitory’ has become a buzzword,” she says. “It is important to be more concrete about what we mean by that. We’re probably going to see in the next few months inflation numbers that are bigger than average, but as long as they keep stepping down, that’s the sign of it being transitory. If we didn’t see any sign of inflation stepping down some, it would’ve started feeling like ‘Houston, we have a problem.’”\nTo buttress my argument beyond that above \"if-then\" syllogism, let’s take a look at why inflation has been so low for the past three decades.\nTo me this is mostly obvious. Prices have been tamped down by the greatest anti-inflation force of our lifetime, that being technology, specifically the explosion of consumer technology. Think about it. The first wave of technology, a good example would be IBM mainframes, saved big companies money in back-office functions, savings which they mostly kept for themselves (higher profits) and their shareholders. But the four great landmark events in the advent of consumer technology; the introduction ofthe PC in 1974 (MITS Altair),the Netscape IPO of 1995,Google search in 1998,and the launch of theiPhone in 2007(I remember Steve Jobs demoing it to me like it was yesterday), greatly accelerated, broadened and deepened this deflationary trend.\nNot only has technology been pushing down the cost of everything from drilling for oil, to manufacturing clothes to farming, and allowing for the creation of groundbreaking (and deflationary) competitors like Uber, Airbnb and Netflix, but it also let consumers find—on their phones—the most affordable trip to Hawaii, the least expensive haircut or the best deal on Nikes.\nSo technology has reduced the cost of almost everything and will continue to do so the rest of our lifetime. Bottom line: Unless something terrible happens, the power of technology will outweigh and outlive COVID.\nThere is one mitigating factor and that is globalism, which is connected to both technology and COVID. Let me briefly explain.\nAfter World War II, most of humanity has become more and more connected in terms of trade, communication, travel, etc. (See supply chain above.) Technology of course was a major enabler here; better ships, planes and faster internet, all of which as it grew more potent, accelerated globalism. Another element was the introduction of political constructs like the World Trade Organization and NAFTA. (I think of the Clinton administration andChina joining the WTO in 2001as perhaps the high-water marks of globalization.)\nLike its technological cousin, globalism has deflationary effects particularly on the labor front as companies could more and more easily find lowest cost countries to produce goods and source materials. And like technology, globalization seemed inexorable, which it was, until it wasn’t. Political winds, manifested by the likes of Brexit and leaders like Putin, Xi Jinping, Erdogan, Bolsonaro, Duterte and of course Donald Trump have caused globalism to wane and anti-globalism and nationalism to wax.\nThe internet too, once seen as only a great connector, has also become a global divider, as the world increasingly fractures into Chinese, U.S. and European walled digital zones when it comes to social media and search for example. Security risks, privacy, spying and hacking of course divide us further here too.\nSo technology, which had made globalism stronger and stronger, now also makes it weaker and weaker.\nCOVID plays a role in rethinking globalism as it exposes vulnerabilities in the supply chain. Companies that were rethinking their manufacturing in China but considering another country, are now wondering if it just makes sense to repatriate the whole shebang. Supply chains that were optimized for cost only are being rethought with security and reliability being factored in and that costs money.\nHow significant is this decline in globalization and how permanent is it? Good questions. But my point here is whether or not \"globalism disrupted\" is transitory (!) or not, it could push prices up, (in the short and intermediate run at least), as cost is sacrificed for predictability. Longer term I say Americans are a resourceful people. We’ll figure out how to make cost effective stuff in the U.S. It’s also likely that globalism will trend upward again, though perhaps not as unfettered as it once was.\nMore downward pressure on pricing could come from shifts in employment practices. Mark Zandi points out that “the work-from-anywhere dynamic could depress wage growth and prices. If I don’t need to work in New York anymore and could live in Tampa, it stands to reason my wage could get cut or I won’t get the same wage increase in the future.”\nAnd so what is Zandi’s take on transitory? “What we’re observing now is prices going back to pre-pandemic,” he says. “The price spikes we’re experiencing now will continue for the next few months through summer but certainly by the end of year, this time next year, they will have disappeared. I do think underlying inflation will be higher post-pandemic than pre-pandemic, but that’s a feature not a bug.”\nI don’t disagree. To me it’s simple: The technology wave I’ve described above is bigger than COVID and bigger than the rise and fall of globalism. And that is why, ladies and gentlemen, I believe inflation will be transitory, certainly in the long run. (Though I’m well aware of whatJohn Maynard Keynes said about the long run.)","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":730,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[{"author":{"id":"3581761553455766","authorId":"3581761553455766","name":"SunnyBoyz","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/08065fda7a858dc38bec2e41d6acaf71","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3581761553455766","authorIdStr":"3581761553455766"},"content":"Done, pls also help me to comment and like my first post from my profile, thanks","text":"Done, pls also help me to comment and like my first post from my profile, thanks","html":"Done, pls also help me to comment and like my first post from my profile, thanks"}],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":167895626,"gmtCreate":1624256862765,"gmtModify":1703831745337,"author":{"id":"3557272953214384","authorId":"3557272953214384","name":"WGSsss","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c859daf551024a3f95b178c72e1b8354","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3557272953214384","authorIdStr":"3557272953214384"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hi all please kindly help me like and comment on this post , thanks in advance . Have a good day.","listText":"Hi all please kindly help me like and comment on this post , thanks in advance . Have a good day.","text":"Hi all please kindly help me like and comment on this post , thanks in advance . Have a good day.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":2,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":16,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/167895626","repostId":"1154249454","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1154249454","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1624230573,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1154249454?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-21 07:09","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Nike, FedEx, Johnson & Johnson, Darden, and Other Stocks for Investors to Watch This Week","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1154249454","media":"barrons","summary":"A handful of notable companies will release their latest results toward the end of this week.Nike,FedEx,andDarden Restaurantswill report on Thursday, followed by CarMax and Paychex on Friday. Wednesday will also feature analyst days and investor events from Johnson & Johnson, GlaxoSmithKline,and Equinix.Economic data out this week include IHS’ Manufacturing and Services Purchasing Managers’ Indexes for June on Wednesday. Both are expected to hold near their record highs. The Census Bureau will r","content":"<p>A handful of notable companies will release their latest results toward the end of this week.Nike,FedEx,andDarden Restaurantswill report on Thursday, followed by CarMax and Paychex on Friday. Wednesday will also feature analyst days and investor events from&nbsp;Johnson &amp;&nbsp;Johnson,&nbsp;GlaxoSmithKline,and&nbsp;Equinix.</p>\n<p>Economic data out this week include IHS’ Manufacturing and Services Purchasing Managers’ Indexes for June on Wednesday. Both are expected to hold near their record highs. The Census Bureau will release the durable-goods report for May on Thursday. Orders—often seen as a decent proxy for business investment—are expected to rise 3.3% month over month.</p>\n<p>And on Friday, the Bureau of Economic Analysis will report personal income and consumption for May. Spending is forecast to continue rising despite a drop off in income as stimulus checks finished being sent out in April.</p>\n<p>Monday 6/21</p>\n<p><b>The Federal Reserve Bank</b>of Chicago releases its National Activity index, a gauge of overall economic activity, for May. Expectations are for a 0.50 reading, higher than April’s 0.24 figure. A positive reading indicates economic growth that is above historical trends.</p>\n<p>Tuesday 6/22</p>\n<p><b>The National Association</b>of Realtors reports existing-home sales for May. Economists forecast a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 5.7 million homes sold, about 150,000 fewer than the April data. Existing-home sales have fallen for three consecutive months, as supply hasn’t been able to keep up with demand.</p>\n<p>Wednesday 6/23</p>\n<p>Equinix hosts its 2021 analyst day, when the company will update its long-term financial outlook.</p>\n<p>GlaxoSmithKline hosts a conference call, featuring its CEO, Emma Walmsley, to update investors on the company’s strategy for growth and shareholder value creation.</p>\n<p>Johnson &amp; Johnson hosts a webcast to discuss its ESG strategy.</p>\n<p><b>The Census Bureau</b>reports new residential construction data for May. Consensus estimate is for a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 875,000 new single-family homes sold, slightly higher than April’s 863,000. Similar to existing-home sales, new-home sales have fallen from their recent peak of 993,000 in January of this year.</p>\n<p><b>IHS Markitreports</b>both its Manufacturing and Services Purchasing Managers’ indexes for June. Expectations are for a 61.5 reading for the Manufacturing PMI, and a 69.8 figure for the Services PMI. Both projections are comparable to the May data as well as being near record highs for their respective indexes.</p>\n<p>Thursday 6/24</p>\n<p><b>The Bureau of Economic Analysis</b>reports the third and final estimate of first-quarter gross-domestic-product growth. Economists forecast a seasonally adjusted annual growth rate of 6.4%.</p>\n<p>Accenture,Darden Restaurants, FedEx, and Nike hold conference calls to discuss quarterly results.</p>\n<p><b>The Bank of England</b>announces its monetary-policy decision. The central bank is widely expected to keep its key interest rate at 0.1%.</p>\n<p><b>The Census Bureau</b>releases the durable-goods report for May. The consensus call is for new orders of manufactured goods to rise 2.8% month over month to $253 billion. Excluding transportation, new orders are projected at 1%, matching the April data.</p>\n<p>Friday 6/25</p>\n<p>CarMax and Paychex report earnings.</p>\n<p><b>The BEA reports</b>personal income and consumption for May. Income is expected to fall 3% month over month, after plummeting 13.1% in April. This reflects a dropoff in stimulus checks that first were sent out in March. Spending is seen rising 0.5%, comparable to the April data.</p>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Nike, FedEx, Johnson & Johnson, Darden, and Other Stocks for Investors to Watch This Week</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nNike, FedEx, Johnson & Johnson, Darden, and Other Stocks for Investors to Watch This Week\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-06-21 07:09 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.barrons.com/articles/nike-fedex-johnson-johnson-darden-and-other-stocks-for-investors-to-watch-this-week-51624215603?mod=hp_LEAD_3><strong>barrons</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>A handful of notable companies will release their latest results toward the end of this week.Nike,FedEx,andDarden Restaurantswill report on Thursday, followed by CarMax and Paychex on Friday. ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/nike-fedex-johnson-johnson-darden-and-other-stocks-for-investors-to-watch-this-week-51624215603?mod=hp_LEAD_3\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NKE":"耐克","JNJ":"强生","DRI":"达登饭店","FDX":"联邦快递"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/nike-fedex-johnson-johnson-darden-and-other-stocks-for-investors-to-watch-this-week-51624215603?mod=hp_LEAD_3","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1154249454","content_text":"A handful of notable companies will release their latest results toward the end of this week.Nike,FedEx,andDarden Restaurantswill report on Thursday, followed by CarMax and Paychex on Friday. Wednesday will also feature analyst days and investor events from Johnson & Johnson, GlaxoSmithKline,and Equinix.\nEconomic data out this week include IHS’ Manufacturing and Services Purchasing Managers’ Indexes for June on Wednesday. Both are expected to hold near their record highs. The Census Bureau will release the durable-goods report for May on Thursday. Orders—often seen as a decent proxy for business investment—are expected to rise 3.3% month over month.\nAnd on Friday, the Bureau of Economic Analysis will report personal income and consumption for May. Spending is forecast to continue rising despite a drop off in income as stimulus checks finished being sent out in April.\nMonday 6/21\nThe Federal Reserve Bankof Chicago releases its National Activity index, a gauge of overall economic activity, for May. Expectations are for a 0.50 reading, higher than April’s 0.24 figure. A positive reading indicates economic growth that is above historical trends.\nTuesday 6/22\nThe National Associationof Realtors reports existing-home sales for May. Economists forecast a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 5.7 million homes sold, about 150,000 fewer than the April data. Existing-home sales have fallen for three consecutive months, as supply hasn’t been able to keep up with demand.\nWednesday 6/23\nEquinix hosts its 2021 analyst day, when the company will update its long-term financial outlook.\nGlaxoSmithKline hosts a conference call, featuring its CEO, Emma Walmsley, to update investors on the company’s strategy for growth and shareholder value creation.\nJohnson & Johnson hosts a webcast to discuss its ESG strategy.\nThe Census Bureaureports new residential construction data for May. Consensus estimate is for a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 875,000 new single-family homes sold, slightly higher than April’s 863,000. Similar to existing-home sales, new-home sales have fallen from their recent peak of 993,000 in January of this year.\nIHS Markitreportsboth its Manufacturing and Services Purchasing Managers’ indexes for June. Expectations are for a 61.5 reading for the Manufacturing PMI, and a 69.8 figure for the Services PMI. Both projections are comparable to the May data as well as being near record highs for their respective indexes.\nThursday 6/24\nThe Bureau of Economic Analysisreports the third and final estimate of first-quarter gross-domestic-product growth. Economists forecast a seasonally adjusted annual growth rate of 6.4%.\nAccenture,Darden Restaurants, FedEx, and Nike hold conference calls to discuss quarterly results.\nThe Bank of Englandannounces its monetary-policy decision. The central bank is widely expected to keep its key interest rate at 0.1%.\nThe Census Bureaureleases the durable-goods report for May. The consensus call is for new orders of manufactured goods to rise 2.8% month over month to $253 billion. Excluding transportation, new orders are projected at 1%, matching the April data.\nFriday 6/25\nCarMax and Paychex report earnings.\nThe BEA reportspersonal income and consumption for May. Income is expected to fall 3% month over month, after plummeting 13.1% in April. This reflects a dropoff in stimulus checks that first were sent out in March. Spending is seen rising 0.5%, comparable to the April data.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":364,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[{"author":{"id":"3557272953214384","authorId":"3557272953214384","name":"WGSsss","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c859daf551024a3f95b178c72e1b8354","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"idStr":"3557272953214384","authorIdStr":"3557272953214384"},"content":"[grimace] [sad] [supercilious look] [money fan] [supercilious look] [speechless] [shy] [bloody] [surprised] [grin] [sad] [supercilious look] [grin] [sad] [grimace] [sad] [grin] [sad] [grimace] [sad] [grin] [sad] [supercilious look] [money fan] [supercilious look] [grin] [sad] [grin] [sad] [supercilious look] [grin] [sad]","text":"[grimace] [sad] [supercilious look] [money fan] [supercilious look] [speechless] [shy] [bloody] [surprised] [grin] [sad] [supercilious look] [grin] [sad] [grimace] [sad] [grin] [sad] [grimace] [sad] [grin] [sad] [supercilious look] [money fan] [supercilious look] [grin] [sad] [grin] [sad] [supercilious look] [grin] [sad]","html":"[grimace] [sad] [supercilious look] [money fan] [supercilious look] [speechless] [shy] [bloody] [surprised] [grin] [sad] [supercilious look] [grin] [sad] [grimace] [sad] [grin] [sad] [grimace] [sad] [grin] [sad] [supercilious look] [money fan] [supercilious look] [grin] [sad] [grin] [sad] [supercilious look] [grin] [sad]"}],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":375897973,"gmtCreate":1619321248192,"gmtModify":1704722419049,"author":{"id":"3557272953214384","authorId":"3557272953214384","name":"WGSsss","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c859daf551024a3f95b178c72e1b8354","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3557272953214384","authorIdStr":"3557272953214384"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"good","listText":"good","text":"good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/375897973","repostId":"1151370935","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1151370935","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1619321187,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1151370935?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-04-25 11:26","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Sell Signals All but Useless in Unchartable 2021 Stock Market","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1151370935","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"Buy-and-hold beats all charting tools tracked by Bloomberg\nBull market penalizes anyone doubting equ","content":"<ul>\n <li>Buy-and-hold beats all charting tools tracked by Bloomberg</li>\n <li>Bull market penalizes anyone doubting equity momentum</li>\n</ul>\n<p>If you bailed because of Bollinger Bands, ran away from relative strength or took direction from the directional market indicator in 2021, you paid for it.</p>\n<p>It’s testament to the straight-up trajectory of stocks that virtually all signals that told investors to do anything but buy have done them a disservice this year. In fact, when applied to the S&amp;P 500, 15 of 22 chart-based indicators tracked by Bloomberg have actually lost money, back-testing data show. And all are doing worse than a simple buy-and-hold strategy, which is up 11%.</p>\n<p>Of course, few investors employ technical studies in isolation, and even when they do, they rarely rely on a single charting technique to inform decisions. But if anything, the exercise is a reminder of the futility of calling a market top in a year when the journey has basically been a one-way trip.</p>\n<p>“What we’ve seen this year is a very strong up market that didn’t get many pullbacks,” said Larry Williams, 78, creator of the Williams %R indicator that’s designed to capture a shift in a security’s momentum. A long-short strategy based on the technique is down 7.8% since the end of December.</p>\n<p>“All the overbought andoversoldindicators, mine as well as anybody else’s, didn’t get many buy signals, but a lot of sells,” he said.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b439de1af4a716ef8a268f3f4a71f916\" tg-width=\"1200\" tg-height=\"675\"></p>\n<p>The temptation to book profits and bail is getting hard to resist after the S&amp;P 500’s best 12-month rally since the 1930s. Increasing the anxiety are a mountain of charts signaling a market that’s stretched to its limits.</p>\n<p>Earlier this month, the index soared 16% above its 200-day average, a feat that before December had occurred only a handful times over the past three decades. Moreover, the benchmark’s relative strength index has surpassed 70 on both a weekly and monthly basis, a sign that the market has risen too far, too fast.</p>\n<p>Add in pundits warning of bubble-like valuations and resurgent coronavirus concerns, and it’s a recipe for sell orders.Hedge funds, for instance, have hit the exits this month, stampeding out of tech stocks just days before Apple Inc. and Amazon.com Inc. report financial results.</p>\n<p>Yet avoiding the stock market for any period of time has proven to be the riskiest wager of all. The S&amp;P 500 has yet to retrench more than 5% this year. At the same time, missing out on the big up days is more penalizing than ever. Absent the top five sessions, the index’s 11% gain dwindles to 2%.</p>\n<p>“To try to guess that this is the right time to be out of the market, you may as well go to Las Vegas,” said Mark Stoeckle, chief executive officer at Adams Funds. “There’s just as much risk doing that.”</p>\n<p>Bloomberg’s back-testing model purchases the S&amp;P 500 when an indicator signals a “buy” and holds it until a “sell” is generated. At that time, the index is sold and a short position is established and kept until a buy is triggered.</p>\n<p>A strategy following RSI signals has dropped 10% this year. The damage occurred as stocks entered the year with unbridled momentum that touched off an order to sell. The trade has since been in place as the S&amp;P 500 never pulled back fast and long enough to flash buy.</p>\n<p>The moving average convergence/divergence indicator -- better known as MACD -- has suffered a loss of 9.8%. Five of the nine trading signals that the model has produced have been buys, and four of them have lost money. In addition, all four short recommendations have been losers.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/564ea77e56445e4e8644023f2fcee27d\" tg-width=\"799\" tg-height=\"617\"></p>\n<p>Such is the cost of betting against momentum in a market where the S&amp;P 500 has already eclipsed the average Wall Street strategist’s&nbsp;year-end target.</p>\n<p>“Today, and for much of 2020, the overbought conditions have been absorbed by the market with more strength, or at best a pause,” said Renaissance Macro Research co-founder Jeff deGraaf, who ranked as the top technical analyst in Institutional Investor’s annual survey for 11 straight years through 2015. “Overbought/oversoldconditions are useless without first defining the underlying trend of the market.”</p>\n<p>Williams, who has been trading since 1962, agrees. Technical analysis tools aren’t broken, he says, but in a bull market that’s as resilient as this one, investors need to use them in the right context.</p>\n<p>“You have to have a different tool, if you will, for a job you’re doing,” he said. “I have a hammer that can build a house, but if I use the hammer to dig a hole in the ground, that’s going to be really hard.”</p>","source":"lsy1584095487587","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Sell Signals All but Useless in Unchartable 2021 Stock Market</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSell Signals All but Useless in Unchartable 2021 Stock Market\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-04-25 11:26 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-04-24/sell-signals-all-but-useless-in-unchartable-2021-stock-market?srnd=markets-vp><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Buy-and-hold beats all charting tools tracked by Bloomberg\nBull market penalizes anyone doubting equity momentum\n\nIf you bailed because of Bollinger Bands, ran away from relative strength or took ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-04-24/sell-signals-all-but-useless-in-unchartable-2021-stock-market?srnd=markets-vp\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-04-24/sell-signals-all-but-useless-in-unchartable-2021-stock-market?srnd=markets-vp","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1151370935","content_text":"Buy-and-hold beats all charting tools tracked by Bloomberg\nBull market penalizes anyone doubting equity momentum\n\nIf you bailed because of Bollinger Bands, ran away from relative strength or took direction from the directional market indicator in 2021, you paid for it.\nIt’s testament to the straight-up trajectory of stocks that virtually all signals that told investors to do anything but buy have done them a disservice this year. In fact, when applied to the S&P 500, 15 of 22 chart-based indicators tracked by Bloomberg have actually lost money, back-testing data show. And all are doing worse than a simple buy-and-hold strategy, which is up 11%.\nOf course, few investors employ technical studies in isolation, and even when they do, they rarely rely on a single charting technique to inform decisions. But if anything, the exercise is a reminder of the futility of calling a market top in a year when the journey has basically been a one-way trip.\n“What we’ve seen this year is a very strong up market that didn’t get many pullbacks,” said Larry Williams, 78, creator of the Williams %R indicator that’s designed to capture a shift in a security’s momentum. A long-short strategy based on the technique is down 7.8% since the end of December.\n“All the overbought andoversoldindicators, mine as well as anybody else’s, didn’t get many buy signals, but a lot of sells,” he said.\n\nThe temptation to book profits and bail is getting hard to resist after the S&P 500’s best 12-month rally since the 1930s. Increasing the anxiety are a mountain of charts signaling a market that’s stretched to its limits.\nEarlier this month, the index soared 16% above its 200-day average, a feat that before December had occurred only a handful times over the past three decades. Moreover, the benchmark’s relative strength index has surpassed 70 on both a weekly and monthly basis, a sign that the market has risen too far, too fast.\nAdd in pundits warning of bubble-like valuations and resurgent coronavirus concerns, and it’s a recipe for sell orders.Hedge funds, for instance, have hit the exits this month, stampeding out of tech stocks just days before Apple Inc. and Amazon.com Inc. report financial results.\nYet avoiding the stock market for any period of time has proven to be the riskiest wager of all. The S&P 500 has yet to retrench more than 5% this year. At the same time, missing out on the big up days is more penalizing than ever. Absent the top five sessions, the index’s 11% gain dwindles to 2%.\n“To try to guess that this is the right time to be out of the market, you may as well go to Las Vegas,” said Mark Stoeckle, chief executive officer at Adams Funds. “There’s just as much risk doing that.”\nBloomberg’s back-testing model purchases the S&P 500 when an indicator signals a “buy” and holds it until a “sell” is generated. At that time, the index is sold and a short position is established and kept until a buy is triggered.\nA strategy following RSI signals has dropped 10% this year. The damage occurred as stocks entered the year with unbridled momentum that touched off an order to sell. The trade has since been in place as the S&P 500 never pulled back fast and long enough to flash buy.\nThe moving average convergence/divergence indicator -- better known as MACD -- has suffered a loss of 9.8%. Five of the nine trading signals that the model has produced have been buys, and four of them have lost money. In addition, all four short recommendations have been losers.\n\nSuch is the cost of betting against momentum in a market where the S&P 500 has already eclipsed the average Wall Street strategist’s year-end target.\n“Today, and for much of 2020, the overbought conditions have been absorbed by the market with more strength, or at best a pause,” said Renaissance Macro Research co-founder Jeff deGraaf, who ranked as the top technical analyst in Institutional Investor’s annual survey for 11 straight years through 2015. “Overbought/oversoldconditions are useless without first defining the underlying trend of the market.”\nWilliams, who has been trading since 1962, agrees. Technical analysis tools aren’t broken, he says, but in a bull market that’s as resilient as this one, investors need to use them in the right context.\n“You have to have a different tool, if you will, for a job you’re doing,” he said. “I have a hammer that can build a house, but if I use the hammer to dig a hole in the ground, that’s going to be really hard.”","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":55,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":186011904,"gmtCreate":1623464956708,"gmtModify":1704204365419,"author":{"id":"3557272953214384","authorId":"3557272953214384","name":"WGSsss","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c859daf551024a3f95b178c72e1b8354","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3557272953214384","authorIdStr":"3557272953214384"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Wow","listText":"Wow","text":"Wow","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/186011904","repostId":"2142120735","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":395,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":348664899,"gmtCreate":1617927076811,"gmtModify":1704704843924,"author":{"id":"3557272953214384","authorId":"3557272953214384","name":"WGSsss","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c859daf551024a3f95b178c72e1b8354","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3557272953214384","authorIdStr":"3557272953214384"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"good","listText":"good","text":"good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/348664899","repostId":"1112389819","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1112389819","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Stock Market Quotes, Business News, Financial News, Trading Ideas, and Stock Research by Professionals","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Benzinga","id":"1052270027","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa"},"pubTimestamp":1617854410,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1112389819?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-04-08 12:00","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Cathie Wood Adds These Stocks To The Newly-Created Space Exploration ETF And Others","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1112389819","media":"Benzinga","summary":"Cathie Wood’s Ark Investment Management sends out an email every night listing the stocks that were ","content":"<p>Cathie Wood’s Ark Investment Management sends out an email every night listing the stocks that were bought or sold by the firm's ETFs that day. In recent months, the emails have known to cause certain stocks to see a spike in the after-hours session. Here’s a list of 35 stocks that the hedge fund bought and sold on Wednesday.</p>\n<p>Trades For<b>ArkSpace Exploration &amp; Innovation ETF</b>ARKX 1.32%:</p>\n<p><b>Atlas Crest Investment Corp</b>ACIC 1.35%: Bought 141,100 shares of the blank check company, representing about 0.2503% of the ETF.</p>\n<p>Atlas Crest shares closed 1.57% lower at $10.06 on Wednesday and were up 1.89% in after-hours trading. The stock has a 52-week high of $18.60 and low of $9.73.</p>\n<p><b>Jaws Spitfire Acquisition Corp</b>SPFR 0.38%: Bought 241,618 shares of the blank check company, representing about 0.4389% of the ETF.</p>\n<p>Jaws stock closed 0.3% higher at $10.46 on Wednesday and rose 1.91% in the after-hours. It has a 52-week high of $12.10 and low of $9.95.</p>\n<p><b>Iridium Communications Inc</b>IRDM 2.05%: Bought 35,963 shares of the mobile<b>satellite communications</b>services, representing about 0.2525% of the ETF.</p>\n<p><i>See Also:The First 39 Companies In Cathie Wood's Ark Invest Space ETF</i></p>\n<p>Iridium shares closed 2.05% lower at $40.07 and were up 1.07% in after-hours trading. The stock has a 52-week high of $54.65 and low of $19.18.</p>\n<p><b>Reinvent Technology Partners</b>RTP 0.2%: Bought 140,900 shares of the blank-check company, representing 0.2496% of the ETF.</p>\n<p>Reinvent shares closed 0.39% lower at $10.11 and were up 1% in after-hours trading. The stock has a 52-week high of $17 and low of $9.86.</p>\n<p><b>Teradyne Inc</b>TER 0.45%: Sold 11,302 shares of the equipment design and manufacturing company, representing about 0.259% of the ETF.</p>\n<p>Teradyne shares closed 0.45% lower at $131.78. The stock has a 52-week high of $147.90 and low of $56.42.</p>\n<p><b>Deere &amp; Co</b>DE 0.28%: Sold 7,781 shares of the agriculture, construction and forestry equipment maker, representing about 0.5072% of the ETF.</p>\n<p>Deere shares closed 0.22% lower at $374.79.The stock has a 52-week high of $392.42 and low of $117.85.</p>\n<p><b>AeroVironment Inc</b>AVAV 3.44%: Sold 5,100 shares in the California-headquartered defense contractor, representing about 0.10% of the ETF.</p>\n<p>AeroVironment stock closed 3.44% lower at $113.37 on Wednesday. It has a 52-week high of $143.72 and low of $53.15.</p>\n<p><b>Taiwan Semiconductor Mfg. Co</b>TSM 2.06%: Sold 28,749 shares in the semiconductor manufacturing and design company, representing about 0.603% of the ETF.</p>\n<p>Taiwan Semiconductor stock closed 2.08% lower at $119.89 on Wednesday. It has a 52-week high of $142.20 and low of $47.72.</p>\n<p>Trades For<b>Ark Fintech Innovation ETF</b>ARKF 1.24%:</p>\n<p><b>Base Inc</b>BAINF 0.97%: Bought 313,000 shares in Tokyo of the online services company that develops and builds e-commerce platforms, representing about 0.1195% of the ETF.</p>\n<p>Base OTC stock closed 0.97% higher at $15.65 on Wednesday. It has a 52-week high of $179 and low of $14.61.</p>\n<p><b>Yeahka Ltd</b>YHEKF: Bought 997,200 shares in Hong Kong of the payment-based technology platform, representing about 0.18% of the ETF.</p>\n<p>Yeahka stock closed 0.64% lower at $7.75 on Wednesday. It has a 52-week high of $15.28 and low of $4.78.</p>\n<p><b>LendingClub Corp</b>LC 0.95%: Bought 204,348 shares of the peer-to-peer lending company, representing about 0.0789% of the ETF.</p>\n<p>LendingClub stock closed 0.88% lower at $15.7 on Wednesday. It has a 52-week high of $22.68 and low of $4.32.</p>\n<p><b>LendingTree Inc</b>TREE 5.34%: Sold 15,762 shares of the online lending marketplace company, representing about 0.0824% of the ETF.</p>\n<p>LendingTree stock closed 5.34% higher at $229.26 on Wednesday. It has a 52-week high of $372.64 and low of $175.</p>\n<p>Trades For<b>Ark Genomic Revolution ETF</b>ARKG 3.26%:</p>\n<p><b>10X Genomics Inc</b>TXG 6.03%: Bought 78,908 shares of the gene sequencing biotechnology company, representing about 0.1526% of the ETF.</p>\n<p>10X shares closed 6.03% lower at $185.34 on Wednesday. It has a 52-week high of $201.70 and low of $58.11.</p>\n<p><b>Signify Health Inc</b>SGFY 3.65%: Bought 182,193 shares of the healthcare tech company, representing about 0.0508% of the ETF.</p>\n<p>Signify shares closed 4.08% lower at $26.35 on Wednesday and were up 0.53% in after-hours. It has a 52-week high of $40.79 and low of $22.13.</p>\n<p><b>Repare Therapeutics Inc</b>RPTX 0.78%: Bought 10,700 shares of the Canadian oncology company, representing about 0.0035% of the ETF.</p>\n<p>Repare stock closed 0.78% higher at $30.96 on Wednesday. It has a 52-week high of $46.44 and low of $21.45.</p>\n<p><b>908 Devices Inc</b>MASS 6.18%: Bought 51,661 shares of the purpose-built handheld and devices for chemical and biomolecular analysis maker, representing about 0.0273% of the ETF.</p>\n<p>908 Devices stock closed 6.18% lower at $46.95 on Wednesday. It has a 52-week high of $79.60 and low of $38.88.</p>\n<p><b>Pluristem Therapeutics Inc</b>PSTI 2.09%: Sold 2,220 shares of the Israel-based stemcell company, representing about 0.0001% of the ETF.</p>\n<p>Pluristem stock closed 2.09% higher at $4.89 on Wednesday. It has a 52-week high of $13.29 and low of $3.95.</p>\n<p>Trades For<b>ArkInnovation ETF</b>ARKK 2.33%:</p>\n<p><b>Zoom Video Communications Inc</b>ZM 2.03%: Bought 98,500 shares of the video calling company, representing about 0.1326% of the ETF.</p>\n<p>Zoom stock closed 2.03% lower at $323.08 on Wednesday. It has a 52-week high of $588.84 and low of $109.57.</p>\n<p><b>10X Genomics Inc</b>TXG 6.03%: Bought 111,047 shares of the gene sequencing biotechnology company, representing about 0.0865% of the ETF.</p>\n<p>10X shares closed 6.03% lower at $185.34 on Wednesday. It has a 52-week high of $201.70 and low of $58.11.</p>\n<p><b>Trimble Inc</b>TRMB 3.84%: Bought 237,782 shares of the California-based hardware, software and services technology company, representing about 0.0813% of the ETF.</p>\n<p>Trimble shares closed 3.84% lower at $79.74 on Wednesday. It has a 52-week high of $84.86 and low of $30.87.</p>\n<p><b>Palantir Technologies Inc</b>PLTR 1.57%: Bought 1,045,600 shares of the big data analytics company, representing about 0.1007% of the ETF.</p>\n<p>Palantir shares closed 1.59% lower at $22.90 on Wednesday and rose 1.05% in the after-hours. It has a 52-week high of $45 and low of $8.90.</p>\n<p><b>Docusign Inc</b>DOCU: Bought 103,783 shares of the online signature services company, representing about 0.0891% of the ETF.</p>\n<p>Docusign shares closed flat at $205.71 on Wednesday and were up 0.63% in after-hours trading. The stock has a 52-week high of $290.23 and low of $85.84.</p>\n<p><b>DraftKings Inc</b>DKNG 2.68%: Bought 610,847 shares of the daily fantasy sports company, representing about 0.1595% of the ETF.</p>\n<p>DraftKings shares closed 2.68% lower at $62.09 on Wednesday and were up 0.64% in the after-hours. It has a 52-week high of $74.38 and low of $12.68.</p>\n<p>Trades for<b>ARK Autonomous Technology &amp; Robotics ETF</b>(BATS:ARKQ):</p>\n<p><b>Atlas Crest Investment Corp</b>ACIC 1.35%: Bought 71,635 shares of the blank check company, representing about 0.0214% of the ETF.</p>\n<p>Atlas Crest shares closed 1.57% lower at $10.06 on Wednesday and were up 1.89% in after-hours trading. The stock has a 52-week high of $18.60 and low of $9.73.</p>\n<p><b>Alphabet Inc</b>GOOGL 1.35%GOOG 1.12%: Sold 16,651 Class C shares of the Google parent company, representing about 1.10% of the ETF.</p>\n<p>Alphabet shares closed 1.35% higher at $2239.03 on Wednesday and were up 0.40% in the after-hours. The stock has a 52-week high of $2,244.50 and low of $1,177.25.</p>\n<p><b>Iridium Communications Inc</b>IRDM 2.05%: Bought 59,521 shares of the mobile<b>satellite communications</b>services, representing about 0.0705% of the ETF.</p>\n<p>Iridium shares closed 2.05% lower at $40.07 and were up 1.07% in after-hours trading. The stock has a 52-week high of $54.65 and low of $19.18.</p>\n<p><b>Kratos Defense &amp; Security Solutions</b>KTOS 2.34%: Bought 313,506 shares of the U.S. defense contractor and security systems integrator company, representing about 0.2583% of the company.</p>\n<p>Kratos Defense shares closed 2.34% lower at $27.97 on Wednesday and were up 1.07% in the after-hours. The stock has a 52-week high of $34.11 and low of $13.34.</p>\n<p><b>Taiwan Semiconductor Mfg. Co</b>TSM 2.06%: Sold 97,700 shares in the semiconductor manufacturing and design company, representing about 0.3467% of the ETF.</p>\n<p>Taiwan Semiconductor stock closed 2.08% lower at $119.89 on Wednesday. It has a 52-week high of $142.20 and low of $47.72.</p>\n<p><b>Teradyne Inc</b>TER 0.45%: Sold 98,161 shares of the equipment design and manufacturing company, representing about 0.3802% of the ETF.</p>\n<p>Teradyne shares closed 0.45% lower at $131.78. The stock has a 52-week high of $147.90 and low of $56.42.</p>\n<p><b>Deere &amp; Co</b>DE 0.28%: Sold 37,795 shares of the agriculture, construction and forestry equipment maker, representing about 0.4162% of the ETF.</p>\n<p>Deere shares closed 0.22% lower at $374.79.The stock has a 52-week high of $392.42 and low of $117.85.</p>\n<p><b>Caterpillar Inc</b>CAT 0.11%: Sold 59,610 shares of the agriculture, construction, mining and forestry equipment maker, representing about 0.4051% of the ETF.</p>\n<p>Caterpillar shares closed 0.1% lower at $230.41.The stock has a 52-week high of $237.78 and low of $100.22.</p>\n<p>Trades For<b>ARK Next Generation Internet ETF</b>ARKW 1.62%</p>\n<p><b>Trade Desk Inc</b>TTD 1.23%: Bought 23,750 shares of the technology platform for ad buyers company, representing about 0.23% of the ETF.</p>\n<p>Trade Desk shares closed 1.23% higher at $677.87 on Wednesday and were up 0.31% in after-hours. It has a 52-week high of $972.80 and low of $190.29.</p>\n<p><b>LendingClub Corp</b>LC 0.95%: Bought 150,245 shares of the peer-to-peer lending company, representing about 0.0337% of the ETF.</p>\n<p>LendingClub stock closed 0.88% lower at $15.7 on Wednesday. It has a 52-week high of $22.68 and low of $4.32.</p>\n<p><b>Synopsys Inc</b>SNPS 0.14%: Sold 70,396 shares of the electronic design automation company, representing about 0.2588% of the ETF.</p>\n<p>Synopsys shares closed 0.14% lower at $257 on Wednesday. It has a 52-week high of $300.91 and low of $133.27.</p>\n<p><b>LendingTree Inc</b>TREE 5.34%: Sold 12,129 shares of the online lending marketplace company, representing about 0.0406% of the ETF.</p>\n<p>LendingTree stock closed 5.34% higher at $229.26 on Wednesday. It has a 52-week high of $372.64 and low of $175.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Cathie Wood Adds These Stocks To The Newly-Created Space Exploration ETF And Others</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nCathie Wood Adds These Stocks To The Newly-Created Space Exploration ETF And Others\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Benzinga </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-04-08 12:00</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Cathie Wood’s Ark Investment Management sends out an email every night listing the stocks that were bought or sold by the firm's ETFs that day. In recent months, the emails have known to cause certain stocks to see a spike in the after-hours session. Here’s a list of 35 stocks that the hedge fund bought and sold on Wednesday.</p>\n<p>Trades For<b>ArkSpace Exploration &amp; Innovation ETF</b>ARKX 1.32%:</p>\n<p><b>Atlas Crest Investment Corp</b>ACIC 1.35%: Bought 141,100 shares of the blank check company, representing about 0.2503% of the ETF.</p>\n<p>Atlas Crest shares closed 1.57% lower at $10.06 on Wednesday and were up 1.89% in after-hours trading. The stock has a 52-week high of $18.60 and low of $9.73.</p>\n<p><b>Jaws Spitfire Acquisition Corp</b>SPFR 0.38%: Bought 241,618 shares of the blank check company, representing about 0.4389% of the ETF.</p>\n<p>Jaws stock closed 0.3% higher at $10.46 on Wednesday and rose 1.91% in the after-hours. It has a 52-week high of $12.10 and low of $9.95.</p>\n<p><b>Iridium Communications Inc</b>IRDM 2.05%: Bought 35,963 shares of the mobile<b>satellite communications</b>services, representing about 0.2525% of the ETF.</p>\n<p><i>See Also:The First 39 Companies In Cathie Wood's Ark Invest Space ETF</i></p>\n<p>Iridium shares closed 2.05% lower at $40.07 and were up 1.07% in after-hours trading. The stock has a 52-week high of $54.65 and low of $19.18.</p>\n<p><b>Reinvent Technology Partners</b>RTP 0.2%: Bought 140,900 shares of the blank-check company, representing 0.2496% of the ETF.</p>\n<p>Reinvent shares closed 0.39% lower at $10.11 and were up 1% in after-hours trading. The stock has a 52-week high of $17 and low of $9.86.</p>\n<p><b>Teradyne Inc</b>TER 0.45%: Sold 11,302 shares of the equipment design and manufacturing company, representing about 0.259% of the ETF.</p>\n<p>Teradyne shares closed 0.45% lower at $131.78. The stock has a 52-week high of $147.90 and low of $56.42.</p>\n<p><b>Deere &amp; Co</b>DE 0.28%: Sold 7,781 shares of the agriculture, construction and forestry equipment maker, representing about 0.5072% of the ETF.</p>\n<p>Deere shares closed 0.22% lower at $374.79.The stock has a 52-week high of $392.42 and low of $117.85.</p>\n<p><b>AeroVironment Inc</b>AVAV 3.44%: Sold 5,100 shares in the California-headquartered defense contractor, representing about 0.10% of the ETF.</p>\n<p>AeroVironment stock closed 3.44% lower at $113.37 on Wednesday. It has a 52-week high of $143.72 and low of $53.15.</p>\n<p><b>Taiwan Semiconductor Mfg. Co</b>TSM 2.06%: Sold 28,749 shares in the semiconductor manufacturing and design company, representing about 0.603% of the ETF.</p>\n<p>Taiwan Semiconductor stock closed 2.08% lower at $119.89 on Wednesday. It has a 52-week high of $142.20 and low of $47.72.</p>\n<p>Trades For<b>Ark Fintech Innovation ETF</b>ARKF 1.24%:</p>\n<p><b>Base Inc</b>BAINF 0.97%: Bought 313,000 shares in Tokyo of the online services company that develops and builds e-commerce platforms, representing about 0.1195% of the ETF.</p>\n<p>Base OTC stock closed 0.97% higher at $15.65 on Wednesday. It has a 52-week high of $179 and low of $14.61.</p>\n<p><b>Yeahka Ltd</b>YHEKF: Bought 997,200 shares in Hong Kong of the payment-based technology platform, representing about 0.18% of the ETF.</p>\n<p>Yeahka stock closed 0.64% lower at $7.75 on Wednesday. It has a 52-week high of $15.28 and low of $4.78.</p>\n<p><b>LendingClub Corp</b>LC 0.95%: Bought 204,348 shares of the peer-to-peer lending company, representing about 0.0789% of the ETF.</p>\n<p>LendingClub stock closed 0.88% lower at $15.7 on Wednesday. It has a 52-week high of $22.68 and low of $4.32.</p>\n<p><b>LendingTree Inc</b>TREE 5.34%: Sold 15,762 shares of the online lending marketplace company, representing about 0.0824% of the ETF.</p>\n<p>LendingTree stock closed 5.34% higher at $229.26 on Wednesday. It has a 52-week high of $372.64 and low of $175.</p>\n<p>Trades For<b>Ark Genomic Revolution ETF</b>ARKG 3.26%:</p>\n<p><b>10X Genomics Inc</b>TXG 6.03%: Bought 78,908 shares of the gene sequencing biotechnology company, representing about 0.1526% of the ETF.</p>\n<p>10X shares closed 6.03% lower at $185.34 on Wednesday. It has a 52-week high of $201.70 and low of $58.11.</p>\n<p><b>Signify Health Inc</b>SGFY 3.65%: Bought 182,193 shares of the healthcare tech company, representing about 0.0508% of the ETF.</p>\n<p>Signify shares closed 4.08% lower at $26.35 on Wednesday and were up 0.53% in after-hours. It has a 52-week high of $40.79 and low of $22.13.</p>\n<p><b>Repare Therapeutics Inc</b>RPTX 0.78%: Bought 10,700 shares of the Canadian oncology company, representing about 0.0035% of the ETF.</p>\n<p>Repare stock closed 0.78% higher at $30.96 on Wednesday. It has a 52-week high of $46.44 and low of $21.45.</p>\n<p><b>908 Devices Inc</b>MASS 6.18%: Bought 51,661 shares of the purpose-built handheld and devices for chemical and biomolecular analysis maker, representing about 0.0273% of the ETF.</p>\n<p>908 Devices stock closed 6.18% lower at $46.95 on Wednesday. It has a 52-week high of $79.60 and low of $38.88.</p>\n<p><b>Pluristem Therapeutics Inc</b>PSTI 2.09%: Sold 2,220 shares of the Israel-based stemcell company, representing about 0.0001% of the ETF.</p>\n<p>Pluristem stock closed 2.09% higher at $4.89 on Wednesday. It has a 52-week high of $13.29 and low of $3.95.</p>\n<p>Trades For<b>ArkInnovation ETF</b>ARKK 2.33%:</p>\n<p><b>Zoom Video Communications Inc</b>ZM 2.03%: Bought 98,500 shares of the video calling company, representing about 0.1326% of the ETF.</p>\n<p>Zoom stock closed 2.03% lower at $323.08 on Wednesday. It has a 52-week high of $588.84 and low of $109.57.</p>\n<p><b>10X Genomics Inc</b>TXG 6.03%: Bought 111,047 shares of the gene sequencing biotechnology company, representing about 0.0865% of the ETF.</p>\n<p>10X shares closed 6.03% lower at $185.34 on Wednesday. It has a 52-week high of $201.70 and low of $58.11.</p>\n<p><b>Trimble Inc</b>TRMB 3.84%: Bought 237,782 shares of the California-based hardware, software and services technology company, representing about 0.0813% of the ETF.</p>\n<p>Trimble shares closed 3.84% lower at $79.74 on Wednesday. It has a 52-week high of $84.86 and low of $30.87.</p>\n<p><b>Palantir Technologies Inc</b>PLTR 1.57%: Bought 1,045,600 shares of the big data analytics company, representing about 0.1007% of the ETF.</p>\n<p>Palantir shares closed 1.59% lower at $22.90 on Wednesday and rose 1.05% in the after-hours. It has a 52-week high of $45 and low of $8.90.</p>\n<p><b>Docusign Inc</b>DOCU: Bought 103,783 shares of the online signature services company, representing about 0.0891% of the ETF.</p>\n<p>Docusign shares closed flat at $205.71 on Wednesday and were up 0.63% in after-hours trading. The stock has a 52-week high of $290.23 and low of $85.84.</p>\n<p><b>DraftKings Inc</b>DKNG 2.68%: Bought 610,847 shares of the daily fantasy sports company, representing about 0.1595% of the ETF.</p>\n<p>DraftKings shares closed 2.68% lower at $62.09 on Wednesday and were up 0.64% in the after-hours. It has a 52-week high of $74.38 and low of $12.68.</p>\n<p>Trades for<b>ARK Autonomous Technology &amp; Robotics ETF</b>(BATS:ARKQ):</p>\n<p><b>Atlas Crest Investment Corp</b>ACIC 1.35%: Bought 71,635 shares of the blank check company, representing about 0.0214% of the ETF.</p>\n<p>Atlas Crest shares closed 1.57% lower at $10.06 on Wednesday and were up 1.89% in after-hours trading. The stock has a 52-week high of $18.60 and low of $9.73.</p>\n<p><b>Alphabet Inc</b>GOOGL 1.35%GOOG 1.12%: Sold 16,651 Class C shares of the Google parent company, representing about 1.10% of the ETF.</p>\n<p>Alphabet shares closed 1.35% higher at $2239.03 on Wednesday and were up 0.40% in the after-hours. The stock has a 52-week high of $2,244.50 and low of $1,177.25.</p>\n<p><b>Iridium Communications Inc</b>IRDM 2.05%: Bought 59,521 shares of the mobile<b>satellite communications</b>services, representing about 0.0705% of the ETF.</p>\n<p>Iridium shares closed 2.05% lower at $40.07 and were up 1.07% in after-hours trading. The stock has a 52-week high of $54.65 and low of $19.18.</p>\n<p><b>Kratos Defense &amp; Security Solutions</b>KTOS 2.34%: Bought 313,506 shares of the U.S. defense contractor and security systems integrator company, representing about 0.2583% of the company.</p>\n<p>Kratos Defense shares closed 2.34% lower at $27.97 on Wednesday and were up 1.07% in the after-hours. The stock has a 52-week high of $34.11 and low of $13.34.</p>\n<p><b>Taiwan Semiconductor Mfg. Co</b>TSM 2.06%: Sold 97,700 shares in the semiconductor manufacturing and design company, representing about 0.3467% of the ETF.</p>\n<p>Taiwan Semiconductor stock closed 2.08% lower at $119.89 on Wednesday. It has a 52-week high of $142.20 and low of $47.72.</p>\n<p><b>Teradyne Inc</b>TER 0.45%: Sold 98,161 shares of the equipment design and manufacturing company, representing about 0.3802% of the ETF.</p>\n<p>Teradyne shares closed 0.45% lower at $131.78. The stock has a 52-week high of $147.90 and low of $56.42.</p>\n<p><b>Deere &amp; Co</b>DE 0.28%: Sold 37,795 shares of the agriculture, construction and forestry equipment maker, representing about 0.4162% of the ETF.</p>\n<p>Deere shares closed 0.22% lower at $374.79.The stock has a 52-week high of $392.42 and low of $117.85.</p>\n<p><b>Caterpillar Inc</b>CAT 0.11%: Sold 59,610 shares of the agriculture, construction, mining and forestry equipment maker, representing about 0.4051% of the ETF.</p>\n<p>Caterpillar shares closed 0.1% lower at $230.41.The stock has a 52-week high of $237.78 and low of $100.22.</p>\n<p>Trades For<b>ARK Next Generation Internet ETF</b>ARKW 1.62%</p>\n<p><b>Trade Desk Inc</b>TTD 1.23%: Bought 23,750 shares of the technology platform for ad buyers company, representing about 0.23% of the ETF.</p>\n<p>Trade Desk shares closed 1.23% higher at $677.87 on Wednesday and were up 0.31% in after-hours. It has a 52-week high of $972.80 and low of $190.29.</p>\n<p><b>LendingClub Corp</b>LC 0.95%: Bought 150,245 shares of the peer-to-peer lending company, representing about 0.0337% of the ETF.</p>\n<p>LendingClub stock closed 0.88% lower at $15.7 on Wednesday. It has a 52-week high of $22.68 and low of $4.32.</p>\n<p><b>Synopsys Inc</b>SNPS 0.14%: Sold 70,396 shares of the electronic design automation company, representing about 0.2588% of the ETF.</p>\n<p>Synopsys shares closed 0.14% lower at $257 on Wednesday. It has a 52-week high of $300.91 and low of $133.27.</p>\n<p><b>LendingTree Inc</b>TREE 5.34%: Sold 12,129 shares of the online lending marketplace company, representing about 0.0406% of the ETF.</p>\n<p>LendingTree stock closed 5.34% higher at $229.26 on Wednesday. It has a 52-week high of $372.64 and low of $175.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1112389819","content_text":"Cathie Wood’s Ark Investment Management sends out an email every night listing the stocks that were bought or sold by the firm's ETFs that day. In recent months, the emails have known to cause certain stocks to see a spike in the after-hours session. Here’s a list of 35 stocks that the hedge fund bought and sold on Wednesday.\nTrades ForArkSpace Exploration & Innovation ETFARKX 1.32%:\nAtlas Crest Investment CorpACIC 1.35%: Bought 141,100 shares of the blank check company, representing about 0.2503% of the ETF.\nAtlas Crest shares closed 1.57% lower at $10.06 on Wednesday and were up 1.89% in after-hours trading. The stock has a 52-week high of $18.60 and low of $9.73.\nJaws Spitfire Acquisition CorpSPFR 0.38%: Bought 241,618 shares of the blank check company, representing about 0.4389% of the ETF.\nJaws stock closed 0.3% higher at $10.46 on Wednesday and rose 1.91% in the after-hours. It has a 52-week high of $12.10 and low of $9.95.\nIridium Communications IncIRDM 2.05%: Bought 35,963 shares of the mobilesatellite communicationsservices, representing about 0.2525% of the ETF.\nSee Also:The First 39 Companies In Cathie Wood's Ark Invest Space ETF\nIridium shares closed 2.05% lower at $40.07 and were up 1.07% in after-hours trading. The stock has a 52-week high of $54.65 and low of $19.18.\nReinvent Technology PartnersRTP 0.2%: Bought 140,900 shares of the blank-check company, representing 0.2496% of the ETF.\nReinvent shares closed 0.39% lower at $10.11 and were up 1% in after-hours trading. The stock has a 52-week high of $17 and low of $9.86.\nTeradyne IncTER 0.45%: Sold 11,302 shares of the equipment design and manufacturing company, representing about 0.259% of the ETF.\nTeradyne shares closed 0.45% lower at $131.78. The stock has a 52-week high of $147.90 and low of $56.42.\nDeere & CoDE 0.28%: Sold 7,781 shares of the agriculture, construction and forestry equipment maker, representing about 0.5072% of the ETF.\nDeere shares closed 0.22% lower at $374.79.The stock has a 52-week high of $392.42 and low of $117.85.\nAeroVironment IncAVAV 3.44%: Sold 5,100 shares in the California-headquartered defense contractor, representing about 0.10% of the ETF.\nAeroVironment stock closed 3.44% lower at $113.37 on Wednesday. It has a 52-week high of $143.72 and low of $53.15.\nTaiwan Semiconductor Mfg. CoTSM 2.06%: Sold 28,749 shares in the semiconductor manufacturing and design company, representing about 0.603% of the ETF.\nTaiwan Semiconductor stock closed 2.08% lower at $119.89 on Wednesday. It has a 52-week high of $142.20 and low of $47.72.\nTrades ForArk Fintech Innovation ETFARKF 1.24%:\nBase IncBAINF 0.97%: Bought 313,000 shares in Tokyo of the online services company that develops and builds e-commerce platforms, representing about 0.1195% of the ETF.\nBase OTC stock closed 0.97% higher at $15.65 on Wednesday. It has a 52-week high of $179 and low of $14.61.\nYeahka LtdYHEKF: Bought 997,200 shares in Hong Kong of the payment-based technology platform, representing about 0.18% of the ETF.\nYeahka stock closed 0.64% lower at $7.75 on Wednesday. It has a 52-week high of $15.28 and low of $4.78.\nLendingClub CorpLC 0.95%: Bought 204,348 shares of the peer-to-peer lending company, representing about 0.0789% of the ETF.\nLendingClub stock closed 0.88% lower at $15.7 on Wednesday. It has a 52-week high of $22.68 and low of $4.32.\nLendingTree IncTREE 5.34%: Sold 15,762 shares of the online lending marketplace company, representing about 0.0824% of the ETF.\nLendingTree stock closed 5.34% higher at $229.26 on Wednesday. It has a 52-week high of $372.64 and low of $175.\nTrades ForArk Genomic Revolution ETFARKG 3.26%:\n10X Genomics IncTXG 6.03%: Bought 78,908 shares of the gene sequencing biotechnology company, representing about 0.1526% of the ETF.\n10X shares closed 6.03% lower at $185.34 on Wednesday. It has a 52-week high of $201.70 and low of $58.11.\nSignify Health IncSGFY 3.65%: Bought 182,193 shares of the healthcare tech company, representing about 0.0508% of the ETF.\nSignify shares closed 4.08% lower at $26.35 on Wednesday and were up 0.53% in after-hours. It has a 52-week high of $40.79 and low of $22.13.\nRepare Therapeutics IncRPTX 0.78%: Bought 10,700 shares of the Canadian oncology company, representing about 0.0035% of the ETF.\nRepare stock closed 0.78% higher at $30.96 on Wednesday. It has a 52-week high of $46.44 and low of $21.45.\n908 Devices IncMASS 6.18%: Bought 51,661 shares of the purpose-built handheld and devices for chemical and biomolecular analysis maker, representing about 0.0273% of the ETF.\n908 Devices stock closed 6.18% lower at $46.95 on Wednesday. It has a 52-week high of $79.60 and low of $38.88.\nPluristem Therapeutics IncPSTI 2.09%: Sold 2,220 shares of the Israel-based stemcell company, representing about 0.0001% of the ETF.\nPluristem stock closed 2.09% higher at $4.89 on Wednesday. It has a 52-week high of $13.29 and low of $3.95.\nTrades ForArkInnovation ETFARKK 2.33%:\nZoom Video Communications IncZM 2.03%: Bought 98,500 shares of the video calling company, representing about 0.1326% of the ETF.\nZoom stock closed 2.03% lower at $323.08 on Wednesday. It has a 52-week high of $588.84 and low of $109.57.\n10X Genomics IncTXG 6.03%: Bought 111,047 shares of the gene sequencing biotechnology company, representing about 0.0865% of the ETF.\n10X shares closed 6.03% lower at $185.34 on Wednesday. It has a 52-week high of $201.70 and low of $58.11.\nTrimble IncTRMB 3.84%: Bought 237,782 shares of the California-based hardware, software and services technology company, representing about 0.0813% of the ETF.\nTrimble shares closed 3.84% lower at $79.74 on Wednesday. It has a 52-week high of $84.86 and low of $30.87.\nPalantir Technologies IncPLTR 1.57%: Bought 1,045,600 shares of the big data analytics company, representing about 0.1007% of the ETF.\nPalantir shares closed 1.59% lower at $22.90 on Wednesday and rose 1.05% in the after-hours. It has a 52-week high of $45 and low of $8.90.\nDocusign IncDOCU: Bought 103,783 shares of the online signature services company, representing about 0.0891% of the ETF.\nDocusign shares closed flat at $205.71 on Wednesday and were up 0.63% in after-hours trading. The stock has a 52-week high of $290.23 and low of $85.84.\nDraftKings IncDKNG 2.68%: Bought 610,847 shares of the daily fantasy sports company, representing about 0.1595% of the ETF.\nDraftKings shares closed 2.68% lower at $62.09 on Wednesday and were up 0.64% in the after-hours. It has a 52-week high of $74.38 and low of $12.68.\nTrades forARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF(BATS:ARKQ):\nAtlas Crest Investment CorpACIC 1.35%: Bought 71,635 shares of the blank check company, representing about 0.0214% of the ETF.\nAtlas Crest shares closed 1.57% lower at $10.06 on Wednesday and were up 1.89% in after-hours trading. The stock has a 52-week high of $18.60 and low of $9.73.\nAlphabet IncGOOGL 1.35%GOOG 1.12%: Sold 16,651 Class C shares of the Google parent company, representing about 1.10% of the ETF.\nAlphabet shares closed 1.35% higher at $2239.03 on Wednesday and were up 0.40% in the after-hours. The stock has a 52-week high of $2,244.50 and low of $1,177.25.\nIridium Communications IncIRDM 2.05%: Bought 59,521 shares of the mobilesatellite communicationsservices, representing about 0.0705% of the ETF.\nIridium shares closed 2.05% lower at $40.07 and were up 1.07% in after-hours trading. The stock has a 52-week high of $54.65 and low of $19.18.\nKratos Defense & Security SolutionsKTOS 2.34%: Bought 313,506 shares of the U.S. defense contractor and security systems integrator company, representing about 0.2583% of the company.\nKratos Defense shares closed 2.34% lower at $27.97 on Wednesday and were up 1.07% in the after-hours. The stock has a 52-week high of $34.11 and low of $13.34.\nTaiwan Semiconductor Mfg. CoTSM 2.06%: Sold 97,700 shares in the semiconductor manufacturing and design company, representing about 0.3467% of the ETF.\nTaiwan Semiconductor stock closed 2.08% lower at $119.89 on Wednesday. It has a 52-week high of $142.20 and low of $47.72.\nTeradyne IncTER 0.45%: Sold 98,161 shares of the equipment design and manufacturing company, representing about 0.3802% of the ETF.\nTeradyne shares closed 0.45% lower at $131.78. The stock has a 52-week high of $147.90 and low of $56.42.\nDeere & CoDE 0.28%: Sold 37,795 shares of the agriculture, construction and forestry equipment maker, representing about 0.4162% of the ETF.\nDeere shares closed 0.22% lower at $374.79.The stock has a 52-week high of $392.42 and low of $117.85.\nCaterpillar IncCAT 0.11%: Sold 59,610 shares of the agriculture, construction, mining and forestry equipment maker, representing about 0.4051% of the ETF.\nCaterpillar shares closed 0.1% lower at $230.41.The stock has a 52-week high of $237.78 and low of $100.22.\nTrades ForARK Next Generation Internet ETFARKW 1.62%\nTrade Desk IncTTD 1.23%: Bought 23,750 shares of the technology platform for ad buyers company, representing about 0.23% of the ETF.\nTrade Desk shares closed 1.23% higher at $677.87 on Wednesday and were up 0.31% in after-hours. It has a 52-week high of $972.80 and low of $190.29.\nLendingClub CorpLC 0.95%: Bought 150,245 shares of the peer-to-peer lending company, representing about 0.0337% of the ETF.\nLendingClub stock closed 0.88% lower at $15.7 on Wednesday. It has a 52-week high of $22.68 and low of $4.32.\nSynopsys IncSNPS 0.14%: Sold 70,396 shares of the electronic design automation company, representing about 0.2588% of the ETF.\nSynopsys shares closed 0.14% lower at $257 on Wednesday. It has a 52-week high of $300.91 and low of $133.27.\nLendingTree IncTREE 5.34%: Sold 12,129 shares of the online lending marketplace company, representing about 0.0406% of the ETF.\nLendingTree stock closed 5.34% higher at $229.26 on Wednesday. It has a 52-week high of $372.64 and low of $175.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":12,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":364836322,"gmtCreate":1614831781166,"gmtModify":1704775781192,"author":{"id":"3557272953214384","authorId":"3557272953214384","name":"WGSsss","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c859daf551024a3f95b178c72e1b8354","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3557272953214384","authorIdStr":"3557272953214384"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"cool","listText":"cool","text":"cool","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/364836322","repostId":"1166414886","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":15,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":109027388,"gmtCreate":1619655814144,"gmtModify":1704727422820,"author":{"id":"3557272953214384","authorId":"3557272953214384","name":"WGSsss","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c859daf551024a3f95b178c72e1b8354","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3557272953214384","authorIdStr":"3557272953214384"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"like and comment pls","listText":"like and comment pls","text":"like and comment pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/109027388","repostId":"1128956391","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1128956391","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1619652261,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1128956391?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-04-29 07:24","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Qualcomm revenue pops 52% on strong smartphone demand","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1128956391","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"KEY POINTS\n\nQualcomm raised its guidance for handset shipments this year.\nThe chipmaker beat on the ","content":"<p><b>KEY POINTS</b></p>\n<ul>\n <li>Qualcomm raised its guidance for handset shipments this year.</li>\n <li>The chipmaker beat on the top and bottom lines, along with quarterly guidance.</li>\n</ul>\n<p>Qualcomm&nbsp;shares rose as much as 5.2% in extended trading on Wednesday after the chipmaker reported fiscal second-quarter earnings that exceeded analysts’ estimates.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/30bb1602abfa262526c90e552358aaec\" tg-width=\"1302\" tg-height=\"833\"></p>\n<p>Here’s how the company did:</p>\n<ul>\n <li><b>Earnings:</b>$1.90 per share, adjusted, vs. $1.67 per share as expected by analysts, according to Refinitiv</li>\n <li><b>Revenue:</b>$7.93 billion vs. $7.62 billion as expected by analysts, according to Refinitiv</li>\n</ul>\n<p>Revenue grew 52% on an annualized basis in the quarter, which ended on March 28, according to a&nbsp;statement. Lower phone demand because of the coronavirus in the&nbsp;year-ago quarter&nbsp;made for faster growth than usual. Strong handset shipments in China also lifted results, Akash Palkhiwala, the company’s finance chief, said on a conference call with analysts. In&nbsp;the previous quarter, revenue grew 63%.</p>\n<p>The company’s profitable Qualcomm Technology Licensing segment, which includes mobile handset patent royalties, contributed $1.61 billion in revenue, which was up 51% and above the $1.35 billion consensus among analysts surveyed by FactSet.</p>\n<p>Qualcomm derives much of its revenue from handset chips, and the deployment of 5G networks creates a growth opportunity for the company, particularly as the economy reopens and people begin to travel more.</p>\n<p>Handset revenue, at $4.07 billion, grew 53%, although analysts polled by FactSet had expected $4.23 billion. The larger Qualcomm CDMA Technologies Segment, which includes handsets as well as radio frequency front end, internet of things and automotive components, came up with $6.28 billion in revenue, surpassing the $6.26 billion FactSet consensus. The company raised its guidance for 3G, 4G and 5G handset shipments in 2021.</p>\n<p>Some of that growth should strengthen Qualcomm’s next quarter. Qualcomm called for fiscal third-quarter adjusted earnings of $1.55 to $1.75 per share on $7.1 billion to $7.9 billion in revenue. Analysts polled by Refinitiv had expected $1.52 in adjusted earnings per share on $7.11 billion in revenue.</p>\n<p>In the fiscal second quarter Qualcommacquiredchip start-up Nuvia for $1.4 billion before working capital and other adjustments, and Qualcommsaidthat on June 30 Cristiano Amon, its president, will replace current CEO Steve Mollenkopf.</p>\n<p>“Despite the industry-wide semiconductor supply shortage, we’re utilizing our scale and working across our entire global supply chain to maximize our ability to capture this opportunity,” Amon said. “We expect material improvements by the end of the calendar year due to planned capacity builds and multi-sourcing initiatives.” Supply conditions will improve at the end of the year, he said.</p>\n<p>Notwithstanding the after-hours move, Qualcomm stock is down 10% since the start of the year, compared with a roughly 12% gain in the S&amp;P 500 index over the same period.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Qualcomm revenue pops 52% on strong smartphone demand</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nQualcomm revenue pops 52% on strong smartphone demand\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-04-29 07:24</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><b>KEY POINTS</b></p>\n<ul>\n <li>Qualcomm raised its guidance for handset shipments this year.</li>\n <li>The chipmaker beat on the top and bottom lines, along with quarterly guidance.</li>\n</ul>\n<p>Qualcomm&nbsp;shares rose as much as 5.2% in extended trading on Wednesday after the chipmaker reported fiscal second-quarter earnings that exceeded analysts’ estimates.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/30bb1602abfa262526c90e552358aaec\" tg-width=\"1302\" tg-height=\"833\"></p>\n<p>Here’s how the company did:</p>\n<ul>\n <li><b>Earnings:</b>$1.90 per share, adjusted, vs. $1.67 per share as expected by analysts, according to Refinitiv</li>\n <li><b>Revenue:</b>$7.93 billion vs. $7.62 billion as expected by analysts, according to Refinitiv</li>\n</ul>\n<p>Revenue grew 52% on an annualized basis in the quarter, which ended on March 28, according to a&nbsp;statement. Lower phone demand because of the coronavirus in the&nbsp;year-ago quarter&nbsp;made for faster growth than usual. Strong handset shipments in China also lifted results, Akash Palkhiwala, the company’s finance chief, said on a conference call with analysts. In&nbsp;the previous quarter, revenue grew 63%.</p>\n<p>The company’s profitable Qualcomm Technology Licensing segment, which includes mobile handset patent royalties, contributed $1.61 billion in revenue, which was up 51% and above the $1.35 billion consensus among analysts surveyed by FactSet.</p>\n<p>Qualcomm derives much of its revenue from handset chips, and the deployment of 5G networks creates a growth opportunity for the company, particularly as the economy reopens and people begin to travel more.</p>\n<p>Handset revenue, at $4.07 billion, grew 53%, although analysts polled by FactSet had expected $4.23 billion. The larger Qualcomm CDMA Technologies Segment, which includes handsets as well as radio frequency front end, internet of things and automotive components, came up with $6.28 billion in revenue, surpassing the $6.26 billion FactSet consensus. The company raised its guidance for 3G, 4G and 5G handset shipments in 2021.</p>\n<p>Some of that growth should strengthen Qualcomm’s next quarter. Qualcomm called for fiscal third-quarter adjusted earnings of $1.55 to $1.75 per share on $7.1 billion to $7.9 billion in revenue. Analysts polled by Refinitiv had expected $1.52 in adjusted earnings per share on $7.11 billion in revenue.</p>\n<p>In the fiscal second quarter Qualcommacquiredchip start-up Nuvia for $1.4 billion before working capital and other adjustments, and Qualcommsaidthat on June 30 Cristiano Amon, its president, will replace current CEO Steve Mollenkopf.</p>\n<p>“Despite the industry-wide semiconductor supply shortage, we’re utilizing our scale and working across our entire global supply chain to maximize our ability to capture this opportunity,” Amon said. “We expect material improvements by the end of the calendar year due to planned capacity builds and multi-sourcing initiatives.” Supply conditions will improve at the end of the year, he said.</p>\n<p>Notwithstanding the after-hours move, Qualcomm stock is down 10% since the start of the year, compared with a roughly 12% gain in the S&amp;P 500 index over the same period.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"QCOM":"高通"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1128956391","content_text":"KEY POINTS\n\nQualcomm raised its guidance for handset shipments this year.\nThe chipmaker beat on the top and bottom lines, along with quarterly guidance.\n\nQualcomm shares rose as much as 5.2% in extended trading on Wednesday after the chipmaker reported fiscal second-quarter earnings that exceeded analysts’ estimates.\n\nHere’s how the company did:\n\nEarnings:$1.90 per share, adjusted, vs. $1.67 per share as expected by analysts, according to Refinitiv\nRevenue:$7.93 billion vs. $7.62 billion as expected by analysts, according to Refinitiv\n\nRevenue grew 52% on an annualized basis in the quarter, which ended on March 28, according to a statement. Lower phone demand because of the coronavirus in the year-ago quarter made for faster growth than usual. Strong handset shipments in China also lifted results, Akash Palkhiwala, the company’s finance chief, said on a conference call with analysts. In the previous quarter, revenue grew 63%.\nThe company’s profitable Qualcomm Technology Licensing segment, which includes mobile handset patent royalties, contributed $1.61 billion in revenue, which was up 51% and above the $1.35 billion consensus among analysts surveyed by FactSet.\nQualcomm derives much of its revenue from handset chips, and the deployment of 5G networks creates a growth opportunity for the company, particularly as the economy reopens and people begin to travel more.\nHandset revenue, at $4.07 billion, grew 53%, although analysts polled by FactSet had expected $4.23 billion. The larger Qualcomm CDMA Technologies Segment, which includes handsets as well as radio frequency front end, internet of things and automotive components, came up with $6.28 billion in revenue, surpassing the $6.26 billion FactSet consensus. The company raised its guidance for 3G, 4G and 5G handset shipments in 2021.\nSome of that growth should strengthen Qualcomm’s next quarter. Qualcomm called for fiscal third-quarter adjusted earnings of $1.55 to $1.75 per share on $7.1 billion to $7.9 billion in revenue. Analysts polled by Refinitiv had expected $1.52 in adjusted earnings per share on $7.11 billion in revenue.\nIn the fiscal second quarter Qualcommacquiredchip start-up Nuvia for $1.4 billion before working capital and other adjustments, and Qualcommsaidthat on June 30 Cristiano Amon, its president, will replace current CEO Steve Mollenkopf.\n“Despite the industry-wide semiconductor supply shortage, we’re utilizing our scale and working across our entire global supply chain to maximize our ability to capture this opportunity,” Amon said. “We expect material improvements by the end of the calendar year due to planned capacity builds and multi-sourcing initiatives.” Supply conditions will improve at the end of the year, he said.\nNotwithstanding the after-hours move, Qualcomm stock is down 10% since the start of the year, compared with a roughly 12% gain in the S&P 500 index over the same period.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":212,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":355298381,"gmtCreate":1617072897243,"gmtModify":1704801588278,"author":{"id":"3557272953214384","authorId":"3557272953214384","name":"WGSsss","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c859daf551024a3f95b178c72e1b8354","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3557272953214384","authorIdStr":"3557272953214384"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/355298381","repostId":"2123269962","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2123269962","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1617072060,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2123269962?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-03-30 10:41","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Micron earnings: Semiconductor shortage leads to heightened expectations","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2123269962","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"Earnings preview: Greater demand for memory chips during COVID-19 pandemic pushed Micron to increase its forecast. Micron Technology Inc. faces a heightened bar of its own making for the rest of the year, as widespread chip shortages push up prices for its core memory chips.Micron $$ is scheduled to report fiscal second-quarter earnings results after the close of markets Wednesday. The Boise, Idaho-based chip maker considerably raised its forecast for the second quarter  earlier this month, sett","content":"<p>MW Micron earnings: Semiconductor shortage leads to heightened expectations</p><p>By Wallace Witkowski</p><p>Earnings preview: Greater demand for memory chips during COVID-19 pandemic pushed Micron to increase its forecast</p><p>Micron Technology Inc. faces a heightened bar of its own making for the rest of the year, as widespread chip shortages push up prices for its core memory chips.</p><p>Micron <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MU\">$(MU)$</a> is scheduled to report fiscal second-quarter earnings results after the close of markets Wednesday. The Boise, Idaho-based chip maker considerably raised its forecast for the second quarter  earlier this month, setting up expectations for the rest of the year.</p><p>The big gain in sales is largely the result of the global semiconductor shortage that developed amid heightened demand during the COVID-19 pandemic. Micron could see revenue surge by more than $1 billion from its core memory products, and analysts expect those types of gains to continue throughout 2021.</p><p>Read: Worldwide chip shortage expected to last into next year, and that's good news for semiconductor stocks</p><p>Micron specializes in DRAM and NAND memory chips. DRAM, or dynamic random access memory, is the type of memory commonly used in PCs and servers, while NAND chips are the flash memory chips used in smaller devices like smartphones and USB drives.</p><p>Analysts on average expect DRAM sales of $4.3 billion, up from $3.08 billion in the year-ago period, and NAND sales of $1.6 billion, up from last year's $1.51 billion, according to FactSet.</p><p>Mizuho analyst Vijay Rakesh, who has a buy rating on Micron and a $100 price target, said he sees the the second half of 2021 as an exceptional cycle for memory-chip makers as \"growth shows more potential upside after recovering frompricing and data center demand headwinds in 2H20/1H21.\"</p><p>Rakesh said that DRAM pricing for PCs are expected to rise 19% from a year ago, when prices dropped 17% year-over-year. NAND prices are expected to remain stable and possibly recover a bit, with 5G-device launches as a tailwind.</p><p>Ahead of the report, the company said it was dropping development of 3D XPoint technology  in order to focus on compute-express link chips for data centers.</p><p>What to expect</p><p>Earnings: Micron on average is expected to post adjusted earnings of 95 cents a share, up sharply from 66 cents a share expected at the beginning of the quarter, based on 29 analysts surveyed by FactSet. Micron forecast earnings of 93 cents to 98 cents a share at the beginning of March, up from its previous forecast of 68 cents to 72 cents a share . Estimize, a software platform that uses crowdsourcing from hedge-fund executives, brokerages, buy-side analysts and others, calls for earnings of 98 cents a share.</p><p>Revenue: Wall Street expects revenue of $6.19 billion from Micron, according to 28 analysts polled by FactSet. That's up from the $5.54 billion forecast at the beginning of the quarter. Micron predicted revenue of $6.2 billion to $6.25 billion at the beginning of March, up from its previous forecast of $5.6 billion to $6 billion. Estimize expects revenue of $6.26 billion.</p><p>Stock movement: Over Micron's fiscal second quarter, the stock rose nearly 21%, compared with a 4.3% increase on the PHLX Semiconductor Index  over the same period, a 1.9% rise by the S&amp;P 500 index  and a 2.8% gain by the Nasdaq Composite Index . Micron shares closed at $94.60 on March 1, their highest closing price in more than 20 years.</p><p>What analysts are saying</p><p>Evercore ISI analyst C.J. Muse, who has an outperform rating and a $135 price target, said in a note related to Micron's hiked forecast that broader chip shortages will keep demand high.</p><p>\"Longer-term, with management calling out undersupply for DRAM through all of CY21 (and even hinting this could continue into CY22) and falling NAND inventories leading to a higher likelihood of a turnaround there, we see a strong roadmap for estimates to continue moving higher through-out CY21,\" Muse said.</p><p>UBS analyst Timothy Arcuri, who has a buy rating, said a recent discussion with a former Micron executive indicated that the company's lesser exposure to NAND compared with competitors gave it an advantage while it stands to benefit from continued high DRAM demand.</p><p>\"DRAM consolidation has played out and Samsung, Hynix &amp; MU are behaving rationally, even as demand remains robust to the point where it is plausible that hyperscalers may consider pre-paying for supply,\" Arcuri said.</p><p>Of the 34 analysts who cover Micron, 28 have buy or overweight ratings, and six have hold ratings, with an average price target of $114.86.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Micron earnings: Semiconductor shortage leads to heightened expectations</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nMicron earnings: Semiconductor shortage leads to heightened expectations\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-03-30 10:41</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>MW Micron earnings: Semiconductor shortage leads to heightened expectations</p><p>By Wallace Witkowski</p><p>Earnings preview: Greater demand for memory chips during COVID-19 pandemic pushed Micron to increase its forecast</p><p>Micron Technology Inc. faces a heightened bar of its own making for the rest of the year, as widespread chip shortages push up prices for its core memory chips.</p><p>Micron <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MU\">$(MU)$</a> is scheduled to report fiscal second-quarter earnings results after the close of markets Wednesday. The Boise, Idaho-based chip maker considerably raised its forecast for the second quarter  earlier this month, setting up expectations for the rest of the year.</p><p>The big gain in sales is largely the result of the global semiconductor shortage that developed amid heightened demand during the COVID-19 pandemic. Micron could see revenue surge by more than $1 billion from its core memory products, and analysts expect those types of gains to continue throughout 2021.</p><p>Read: Worldwide chip shortage expected to last into next year, and that's good news for semiconductor stocks</p><p>Micron specializes in DRAM and NAND memory chips. DRAM, or dynamic random access memory, is the type of memory commonly used in PCs and servers, while NAND chips are the flash memory chips used in smaller devices like smartphones and USB drives.</p><p>Analysts on average expect DRAM sales of $4.3 billion, up from $3.08 billion in the year-ago period, and NAND sales of $1.6 billion, up from last year's $1.51 billion, according to FactSet.</p><p>Mizuho analyst Vijay Rakesh, who has a buy rating on Micron and a $100 price target, said he sees the the second half of 2021 as an exceptional cycle for memory-chip makers as \"growth shows more potential upside after recovering frompricing and data center demand headwinds in 2H20/1H21.\"</p><p>Rakesh said that DRAM pricing for PCs are expected to rise 19% from a year ago, when prices dropped 17% year-over-year. NAND prices are expected to remain stable and possibly recover a bit, with 5G-device launches as a tailwind.</p><p>Ahead of the report, the company said it was dropping development of 3D XPoint technology  in order to focus on compute-express link chips for data centers.</p><p>What to expect</p><p>Earnings: Micron on average is expected to post adjusted earnings of 95 cents a share, up sharply from 66 cents a share expected at the beginning of the quarter, based on 29 analysts surveyed by FactSet. Micron forecast earnings of 93 cents to 98 cents a share at the beginning of March, up from its previous forecast of 68 cents to 72 cents a share . Estimize, a software platform that uses crowdsourcing from hedge-fund executives, brokerages, buy-side analysts and others, calls for earnings of 98 cents a share.</p><p>Revenue: Wall Street expects revenue of $6.19 billion from Micron, according to 28 analysts polled by FactSet. That's up from the $5.54 billion forecast at the beginning of the quarter. Micron predicted revenue of $6.2 billion to $6.25 billion at the beginning of March, up from its previous forecast of $5.6 billion to $6 billion. Estimize expects revenue of $6.26 billion.</p><p>Stock movement: Over Micron's fiscal second quarter, the stock rose nearly 21%, compared with a 4.3% increase on the PHLX Semiconductor Index  over the same period, a 1.9% rise by the S&amp;P 500 index  and a 2.8% gain by the Nasdaq Composite Index . Micron shares closed at $94.60 on March 1, their highest closing price in more than 20 years.</p><p>What analysts are saying</p><p>Evercore ISI analyst C.J. Muse, who has an outperform rating and a $135 price target, said in a note related to Micron's hiked forecast that broader chip shortages will keep demand high.</p><p>\"Longer-term, with management calling out undersupply for DRAM through all of CY21 (and even hinting this could continue into CY22) and falling NAND inventories leading to a higher likelihood of a turnaround there, we see a strong roadmap for estimates to continue moving higher through-out CY21,\" Muse said.</p><p>UBS analyst Timothy Arcuri, who has a buy rating, said a recent discussion with a former Micron executive indicated that the company's lesser exposure to NAND compared with competitors gave it an advantage while it stands to benefit from continued high DRAM demand.</p><p>\"DRAM consolidation has played out and Samsung, Hynix &amp; MU are behaving rationally, even as demand remains robust to the point where it is plausible that hyperscalers may consider pre-paying for supply,\" Arcuri said.</p><p>Of the 34 analysts who cover Micron, 28 have buy or overweight ratings, and six have hold ratings, with an average price target of $114.86.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f5e8aba7de194dc92d26747c1cfec057","relate_stocks":{"MU":"美光科技"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2123269962","content_text":"MW Micron earnings: Semiconductor shortage leads to heightened expectationsBy Wallace WitkowskiEarnings preview: Greater demand for memory chips during COVID-19 pandemic pushed Micron to increase its forecastMicron Technology Inc. faces a heightened bar of its own making for the rest of the year, as widespread chip shortages push up prices for its core memory chips.Micron $(MU)$ is scheduled to report fiscal second-quarter earnings results after the close of markets Wednesday. The Boise, Idaho-based chip maker considerably raised its forecast for the second quarter  earlier this month, setting up expectations for the rest of the year.The big gain in sales is largely the result of the global semiconductor shortage that developed amid heightened demand during the COVID-19 pandemic. Micron could see revenue surge by more than $1 billion from its core memory products, and analysts expect those types of gains to continue throughout 2021.Read: Worldwide chip shortage expected to last into next year, and that's good news for semiconductor stocksMicron specializes in DRAM and NAND memory chips. DRAM, or dynamic random access memory, is the type of memory commonly used in PCs and servers, while NAND chips are the flash memory chips used in smaller devices like smartphones and USB drives.Analysts on average expect DRAM sales of $4.3 billion, up from $3.08 billion in the year-ago period, and NAND sales of $1.6 billion, up from last year's $1.51 billion, according to FactSet.Mizuho analyst Vijay Rakesh, who has a buy rating on Micron and a $100 price target, said he sees the the second half of 2021 as an exceptional cycle for memory-chip makers as \"growth shows more potential upside after recovering frompricing and data center demand headwinds in 2H20/1H21.\"Rakesh said that DRAM pricing for PCs are expected to rise 19% from a year ago, when prices dropped 17% year-over-year. NAND prices are expected to remain stable and possibly recover a bit, with 5G-device launches as a tailwind.Ahead of the report, the company said it was dropping development of 3D XPoint technology  in order to focus on compute-express link chips for data centers.What to expectEarnings: Micron on average is expected to post adjusted earnings of 95 cents a share, up sharply from 66 cents a share expected at the beginning of the quarter, based on 29 analysts surveyed by FactSet. Micron forecast earnings of 93 cents to 98 cents a share at the beginning of March, up from its previous forecast of 68 cents to 72 cents a share . Estimize, a software platform that uses crowdsourcing from hedge-fund executives, brokerages, buy-side analysts and others, calls for earnings of 98 cents a share.Revenue: Wall Street expects revenue of $6.19 billion from Micron, according to 28 analysts polled by FactSet. That's up from the $5.54 billion forecast at the beginning of the quarter. Micron predicted revenue of $6.2 billion to $6.25 billion at the beginning of March, up from its previous forecast of $5.6 billion to $6 billion. Estimize expects revenue of $6.26 billion.Stock movement: Over Micron's fiscal second quarter, the stock rose nearly 21%, compared with a 4.3% increase on the PHLX Semiconductor Index  over the same period, a 1.9% rise by the S&P 500 index  and a 2.8% gain by the Nasdaq Composite Index . Micron shares closed at $94.60 on March 1, their highest closing price in more than 20 years.What analysts are sayingEvercore ISI analyst C.J. Muse, who has an outperform rating and a $135 price target, said in a note related to Micron's hiked forecast that broader chip shortages will keep demand high.\"Longer-term, with management calling out undersupply for DRAM through all of CY21 (and even hinting this could continue into CY22) and falling NAND inventories leading to a higher likelihood of a turnaround there, we see a strong roadmap for estimates to continue moving higher through-out CY21,\" Muse said.UBS analyst Timothy Arcuri, who has a buy rating, said a recent discussion with a former Micron executive indicated that the company's lesser exposure to NAND compared with competitors gave it an advantage while it stands to benefit from continued high DRAM demand.\"DRAM consolidation has played out and Samsung, Hynix & MU are behaving rationally, even as demand remains robust to the point where it is plausible that hyperscalers may consider pre-paying for supply,\" Arcuri said.Of the 34 analysts who cover Micron, 28 have buy or overweight ratings, and six have hold ratings, with an average price target of $114.86.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":91,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":374743499,"gmtCreate":1619482507111,"gmtModify":1704724571689,"author":{"id":"3557272953214384","authorId":"3557272953214384","name":"WGSsss","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c859daf551024a3f95b178c72e1b8354","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3557272953214384","authorIdStr":"3557272953214384"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/374743499","repostId":"1117140629","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1117140629","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1619482353,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1117140629?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-04-27 08:12","market":"fut","language":"en","title":"Oil Holds Drop Near $62 With Virus Flare-Up Looming Over Market","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1117140629","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"OPEC+ boosts demand growth estimate, cautions on Covid-19\nWTI crude futures add 0.2% after declining","content":"<ul>\n <li>OPEC+ boosts demand growth estimate, cautions on Covid-19</li>\n <li>WTI crude futures add 0.2% after declining 0.4% on Monday</li>\n</ul>\n<p>Oil was steady in early Asian trading with a Covid-19 flare-up in India and other nations dragging on the near-term demand outlook, even as OPEC+ projected a strong global recovery this year.</p>\n<p>Futures in New York traded near $62 a barrel after slipping 0.4% on Monday. An OPEC+ technical committee raised its forecast for demand growth in 2021, but cautioned that a&nbsp;resurgent virus&nbsp;in India, Japan and Brazil could derail the oil demand recovery. The second Indian wave has been particularly deadly as it overwhelms the health-care system and cripples&nbsp;fuel consumption.</p>\n<p>Indian Oil Corp., the country’s biggest refiner, is looking to offload gasoline into the spot market in a&nbsp;rare sale, while other processors are&nbsp;postponing&nbsp;planned maintenance at some plants as workers either flee or fall ill.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b85665fb36dc3e16ebb8964cd16315b3\" tg-width=\"1200\" tg-height=\"675\"></p>\n<p>The deteriorating outlook in some countries may pose a challenge to OPEC+ when it meets for a monthly&nbsp;ministerial meeting&nbsp;on Wednesday to discuss its production policy, although the group has already agreed to start adding more supply to the market from May. OPEC Secretary-General Mohammad Barkindo said Monday that there are “positive signals” in the global economy, but also pointed to factors in the oil market that require ongoing vigilance.</p>\n<p>The prompt timespread for Brent was 62 cents in backwardation -- a bullish market structure were near-dated contracts are more expensive than later-dated ones -- on Monday. That compares with 40 cents at the start of April.</p>\n<p>The OPEC+ committee of technical experts forecast that oil consumption will rebound by 6 million barrels a day this year from last, according to delegates who attended the panel on Monday. Most of the fuel inventories glut built up during the pandemic will have cleared by the end of this quarter, they said.</p>","source":"lsy1584095487587","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Oil Holds Drop Near $62 With Virus Flare-Up Looming Over Market</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nOil Holds Drop Near $62 With Virus Flare-Up Looming Over Market\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-04-27 08:12 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-04-26/oil-holds-drop-near-62-with-virus-flare-up-looming-over-market?srnd=premium-asia><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>OPEC+ boosts demand growth estimate, cautions on Covid-19\nWTI crude futures add 0.2% after declining 0.4% on Monday\n\nOil was steady in early Asian trading with a Covid-19 flare-up in India and other ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-04-26/oil-holds-drop-near-62-with-virus-flare-up-looming-over-market?srnd=premium-asia\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-04-26/oil-holds-drop-near-62-with-virus-flare-up-looming-over-market?srnd=premium-asia","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1117140629","content_text":"OPEC+ boosts demand growth estimate, cautions on Covid-19\nWTI crude futures add 0.2% after declining 0.4% on Monday\n\nOil was steady in early Asian trading with a Covid-19 flare-up in India and other nations dragging on the near-term demand outlook, even as OPEC+ projected a strong global recovery this year.\nFutures in New York traded near $62 a barrel after slipping 0.4% on Monday. An OPEC+ technical committee raised its forecast for demand growth in 2021, but cautioned that a resurgent virus in India, Japan and Brazil could derail the oil demand recovery. The second Indian wave has been particularly deadly as it overwhelms the health-care system and cripples fuel consumption.\nIndian Oil Corp., the country’s biggest refiner, is looking to offload gasoline into the spot market in a rare sale, while other processors are postponing planned maintenance at some plants as workers either flee or fall ill.\n\nThe deteriorating outlook in some countries may pose a challenge to OPEC+ when it meets for a monthly ministerial meeting on Wednesday to discuss its production policy, although the group has already agreed to start adding more supply to the market from May. OPEC Secretary-General Mohammad Barkindo said Monday that there are “positive signals” in the global economy, but also pointed to factors in the oil market that require ongoing vigilance.\nThe prompt timespread for Brent was 62 cents in backwardation -- a bullish market structure were near-dated contracts are more expensive than later-dated ones -- on Monday. That compares with 40 cents at the start of April.\nThe OPEC+ committee of technical experts forecast that oil consumption will rebound by 6 million barrels a day this year from last, according to delegates who attended the panel on Monday. Most of the fuel inventories glut built up during the pandemic will have cleared by the end of this quarter, they said.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":98,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":372722286,"gmtCreate":1619246069445,"gmtModify":1704721808565,"author":{"id":"3557272953214384","authorId":"3557272953214384","name":"WGSsss","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c859daf551024a3f95b178c72e1b8354","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3557272953214384","authorIdStr":"3557272953214384"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/372722286","repostId":"1149578575","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1149578575","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1619191312,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1149578575?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-04-23 23:21","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Elon Musk wants SpaceX to reach Mars so humanity is not a ‘single-planet species’","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1149578575","media":"CNBC","summary":"Elon Musk remains focused on his vision for SpaceX: Establishing a permanent human presence on Mars.“We don’t want to be one of those single-planet species; we want to be a multi-planet species,” Musk said on Friday.While the company is flying astronauts with its Falcon 9 rockets and Crew Dragon capsules, SpaceX is working to develop Starship: An enormous stainless steel rocket, designed to be fully reusable and carry people to the moon and Mars.SpaceX founder and CEO Elon Musk remains focused o","content":"<div>\n<p>KEY POINTS\n\nElon Musk remains focused on his vision for SpaceX: Establishing a permanent human presence on Mars.\n“We don’t want to be one of those single-planet species; we want to be a multi-planet ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/04/23/elon-musk-aiming-for-mars-so-humanity-is-not-a-single-planet-species.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"cnbc_highlight","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Elon Musk wants SpaceX to reach Mars so humanity is not a ‘single-planet species’</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nElon Musk wants SpaceX to reach Mars so humanity is not a ‘single-planet species’\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-04-23 23:21 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.cnbc.com/2021/04/23/elon-musk-aiming-for-mars-so-humanity-is-not-a-single-planet-species.html><strong>CNBC</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>KEY POINTS\n\nElon Musk remains focused on his vision for SpaceX: Establishing a permanent human presence on Mars.\n“We don’t want to be one of those single-planet species; we want to be a multi-planet ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/04/23/elon-musk-aiming-for-mars-so-humanity-is-not-a-single-planet-species.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/04/23/elon-musk-aiming-for-mars-so-humanity-is-not-a-single-planet-species.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/72bb72e1b84c09fca865c6dcb1bbcd16","article_id":"1149578575","content_text":"KEY POINTS\n\nElon Musk remains focused on his vision for SpaceX: Establishing a permanent human presence on Mars.\n“We don’t want to be one of those single-planet species; we want to be a multi-planet species,” Musk said on Friday.\nWhile the company is flying astronauts with its Falcon 9 rockets and Crew Dragon capsules, SpaceX is working to develop Starship: An enormous stainless steel rocket, designed to be fully reusable and carry people to the moon and Mars.\n\nSpaceX founder and CEO Elon Musk remains focused on his vision for the company: Establishing a permanent human presence on Mars, with its Starship rockets carrying people to and from the red planet.\n“We don’t want to be one of those single planet species, we want to be a multi-planet species,” Musk said on Friday, speaking after the company launched its Crew-2 mission to orbit.\n“It’s been now almost half a century since humans were last on the moon. That’s too long, we need to get back there and have a permanent base on the moon — again, like a big permanently occupied base on the moon. And then build a city on Mars to become a spacefaring civilization, a multi-planet species,” Musk also said.\nStarship is the enormous stainless steel rocket that SpaceX has been building and testing at its development facility in Boca Chica, Texas. Starship’s goal is to launch cargo and people on missions to the moon and Mars. Current Starship prototypes stand at about 150 feet tall, or about the size of a 15-story building, and each one is powered by three Raptor rocket engines.\nStarship prototype rocket SN10 stands on the launchpad at the company’s facility in Boca Chica, Texas.\nMusk has previously estimated that it will cost about $5 billion to fully develop Starship, although SpaceX has not disclosed how much it has spent on the program to date. The company has steadily raised funds in the past few years, to fund both Starship and its similarly ambitious Starlink project, with SpaceX’s valuation soaring to about $74 billion— making it one of the most valuable private companies in the world.\nAdditionally, SpaceX last week won a $2.9 billion contract from NASA, to help the space agency land astronauts on the moon’s surface with the first crewed mission targeting 2024.\n″[Starship has] mostly been funded internally thus far and it’s pretty expensive. As you can tell, if you’ve been watching videos, we’ve blown up a few of them,” Musk said.\nThe company has performed multiple successful test flights of Starship, although landing attempts after the last four high-altitude flights ended in fiery explosions. Despite the the prototypes’ destruction, SpaceX sees the test flights as progress toward creating a rocket that is fully reusable. SpaceX’s current Falcon fleet of rockets is partially reusable, as the company can land and reuse the rocket’s boosters.\nBut Musk hopes Starship transforms space travel into something more akin to commercial air travel. The rocket’s enormous size would also make it capable of launching several times as much cargo at once — for comparison, while SpaceX’s Falcon 9 rockets can send as many as 60 Starlink satellites at a time, SpaceX says Starship will be able to launch 400 Starlink satellites at a time.\nMusk remains “highly confident” that SpaceX will land humans on Mars by 2026, saying last December that it’s an achievable goal “about six years from now.” He added that SpaceX plans to send a Starship rocket without crew “in two years.”\nAn artist rendering of SpaceX’s Starship rockets on the surface of Mars.\nIn the meantime, SpaceX has many milestones to go before Starship can carry passengers. The rocket has yet to reach orbit. Musk last year said that the company will fly “hundreds of missions with satellites before we put people on board.”\nMusk may be focused on Mars, but the hurdles of Starship’s development are not lost on the space billionaire.\n“It’s a tough vehicle to build because we’re trying to crack this nut of a rapid and fully reusable rocket,” Musk said. “But the thing that’s really important to revolutionize space is a rapidly reusable rocket that’s reliable, too.”","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":82,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":342281148,"gmtCreate":1618221802784,"gmtModify":1704707682926,"author":{"id":"3557272953214384","authorId":"3557272953214384","name":"WGSsss","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c859daf551024a3f95b178c72e1b8354","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3557272953214384","authorIdStr":"3557272953214384"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/342281148","repostId":"1136857956","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1136857956","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Stock Market Quotes, Business News, Financial News, Trading Ideas, and Stock Research by Professionals","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Benzinga","id":"1052270027","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa"},"pubTimestamp":1618219145,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1136857956?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-04-12 17:19","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Exclusive: Gary Vee And Matt Higgins Talk Coinbase IPO, Going Public At Height Of A Trend","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1136857956","media":"Benzinga","summary":"As the markets wait with anticipation for this coming week's IPO of Coinbase, Matt Higgins and Gary ","content":"<p>As the markets wait with anticipation for this coming week's IPO of Coinbase,&nbsp;Matt Higgins and Gary Vaynerchuk joined Benzinga’s “SPACs Attack” last week to share their thoughts.</p><p>The duo were early investors in Coinbase and talked about&nbsp;the company and the excitement surrounding the IPO.</p><p><b>Investment in Coinbase:</b>&nbsp;Matt Higgins, CEO of&nbsp;<b>Omnichannel Acquisition Corp</b>&nbsp;(NYSE:OCA), and Vayner Media CEO Gary Vaynerchuk, or simply \"Gary Vee,\" invested in Coinbase in 2014.</p><p>“Matt and I are crapping our pants out of excitement,” Vaynerchuk told Benzinga on the upcoming Coinbase IPO.</p><p>Higgins, who mined Bitcoin, admitted there was a moment when he lost interest in the cryptocurrency over time.</p><p>“The best decisions are gut sandwiches,” Higgins told Benzinga. The CEO said he has come to trust Gary Vee when it comes to macro trends.</p><p>The duo went heavy on Coinbase in their last fund and are excited to see the company IPO.</p><p><b>Coinbase IPO:</b>Vaynerchuk is excited to see Coinbase go public at the height of a trend with strong economics. Vaynerchuk brought up examples like<b>Alphabet Inc</b>(NASDAQ:GOOG) (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and<b>Facebook Inc</b>&nbsp;(NASDAQ:FB) which went public while on their way to profits.</p><p>“Aren’t that many times there is a macro trend and the leader is coming to market with real numbers,” Vaynerchuk said.</p><p>Coinbase has revenue growth, profits and user growth ahead of its IPO, which is coming this Wednesday,&nbsp;April 14, in a direct listing.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Exclusive: Gary Vee And Matt Higgins Talk Coinbase IPO, Going Public At Height Of A Trend</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nExclusive: Gary Vee And Matt Higgins Talk Coinbase IPO, Going Public At Height Of A Trend\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Benzinga </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-04-12 17:19</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>As the markets wait with anticipation for this coming week's IPO of Coinbase,&nbsp;Matt Higgins and Gary Vaynerchuk joined Benzinga’s “SPACs Attack” last week to share their thoughts.</p><p>The duo were early investors in Coinbase and talked about&nbsp;the company and the excitement surrounding the IPO.</p><p><b>Investment in Coinbase:</b>&nbsp;Matt Higgins, CEO of&nbsp;<b>Omnichannel Acquisition Corp</b>&nbsp;(NYSE:OCA), and Vayner Media CEO Gary Vaynerchuk, or simply \"Gary Vee,\" invested in Coinbase in 2014.</p><p>“Matt and I are crapping our pants out of excitement,” Vaynerchuk told Benzinga on the upcoming Coinbase IPO.</p><p>Higgins, who mined Bitcoin, admitted there was a moment when he lost interest in the cryptocurrency over time.</p><p>“The best decisions are gut sandwiches,” Higgins told Benzinga. The CEO said he has come to trust Gary Vee when it comes to macro trends.</p><p>The duo went heavy on Coinbase in their last fund and are excited to see the company IPO.</p><p><b>Coinbase IPO:</b>Vaynerchuk is excited to see Coinbase go public at the height of a trend with strong economics. Vaynerchuk brought up examples like<b>Alphabet Inc</b>(NASDAQ:GOOG) (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and<b>Facebook Inc</b>&nbsp;(NASDAQ:FB) which went public while on their way to profits.</p><p>“Aren’t that many times there is a macro trend and the leader is coming to market with real numbers,” Vaynerchuk said.</p><p>Coinbase has revenue growth, profits and user growth ahead of its IPO, which is coming this Wednesday,&nbsp;April 14, in a direct listing.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"COIN":"Coinbase Global, Inc."},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1136857956","content_text":"As the markets wait with anticipation for this coming week's IPO of Coinbase, Matt Higgins and Gary Vaynerchuk joined Benzinga’s “SPACs Attack” last week to share their thoughts.The duo were early investors in Coinbase and talked about the company and the excitement surrounding the IPO.Investment in Coinbase: Matt Higgins, CEO of Omnichannel Acquisition Corp (NYSE:OCA), and Vayner Media CEO Gary Vaynerchuk, or simply \"Gary Vee,\" invested in Coinbase in 2014.“Matt and I are crapping our pants out of excitement,” Vaynerchuk told Benzinga on the upcoming Coinbase IPO.Higgins, who mined Bitcoin, admitted there was a moment when he lost interest in the cryptocurrency over time.“The best decisions are gut sandwiches,” Higgins told Benzinga. The CEO said he has come to trust Gary Vee when it comes to macro trends.The duo went heavy on Coinbase in their last fund and are excited to see the company IPO.Coinbase IPO:Vaynerchuk is excited to see Coinbase go public at the height of a trend with strong economics. Vaynerchuk brought up examples likeAlphabet Inc(NASDAQ:GOOG) (NASDAQ:GOOGL) andFacebook Inc (NASDAQ:FB) which went public while on their way to profits.“Aren’t that many times there is a macro trend and the leader is coming to market with real numbers,” Vaynerchuk said.Coinbase has revenue growth, profits and user growth ahead of its IPO, which is coming this Wednesday, April 14, in a direct listing.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":105,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":348664788,"gmtCreate":1617927098244,"gmtModify":1704704844571,"author":{"id":"3557272953214384","authorId":"3557272953214384","name":"WGSsss","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c859daf551024a3f95b178c72e1b8354","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3557272953214384","authorIdStr":"3557272953214384"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Great ariticle, would you like to share it?","listText":"Great ariticle, would you like to share it?","text":"Great ariticle, would you like to share it?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/348664788","repostId":"2126274701","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2126274701","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Stock Market Quotes, Business News, Financial News, Trading Ideas, and Stock Research by Professionals","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Benzinga","id":"1052270027","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa"},"pubTimestamp":1617925872,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2126274701?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-04-09 07:51","market":"us","language":"en","title":"3 FAANG Stock Laggards Look For A Return To Highs","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2126274701","media":"Benzinga","summary":"Amazon.com Inc (NASDAQ: AMZN), Apple Inc (NASDAQ: AAPL) and Netflix Inc (NASDAQ: NFLX) have been lag","content":"<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9a40c2221442aec560e8e6188688ad14\" tg-width=\"600\" tg-height=\"400\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p><b>Amazon.com Inc</b> (NASDAQ: AMZN), <b>Apple Inc</b> (NASDAQ: AAPL) and <b>Netflix Inc</b> (NASDAQ: NFLX) have been lagging their FAANG counterparts.</p>\n<p>After retracing 18%, 21% and 17%, respectively, from&nbsp;all-time highs, none of the stocks has made a run at an all-time high, as is the case with&nbsp;<b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FB\">Facebook</a> Inc</b> (NASDAQ: FB) and <b>Alphabet Inc</b> (NASDAQ: GOOG) (NASDAQ: GOOGL).</p>\n<p>This could change, however, as the Nasdaq 100 has had a bullish seven trading sessions and looks to be working its way back toward the all-time high of 13,909.80 it made on Feb. 16.</p>\n<p><b>The Amazon Chart:</b> On Thursday, Amazon broke above the bullish descending channel it had been trading in since Sept. 2, 2020.</p>\n<p>On April 1, the eight-day exponential moving average (EMA) crossed above the 21-day EMA, which is bullish, and Amazon’s stock has been trading above both commonly followed EMAs ever since.</p>\n<p>Although it appears somewhat extended from the EMAs on the daily chart —&nbsp;meaning it may need some daily consolidation so the EMAs can catch up to Amazon’s price —&nbsp;the stock looks to be headed towards it&nbsp;next resistance level of around $3,342.</p>\n<p>If Amazon’s stock can rise above the next resistance level, it could&nbsp;make its way back toward&nbsp;its all-time high of $3,552.25.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c7aa3dc9961d332b9c3debad9c1d942b\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><b>The Apple Chart:</b> On Wednesday, Apple’s stock broke above its resistance level of $127.28 after getting follow-through from a bullish inverted head-and-shoulder pattern.</p>\n<p>It is trading above both the eight-day and 21-day EMAs, which crossed back on April 5 but&nbsp;like Amazon’s stock, it is extended from the EMAs and may need consolidation before a stronger push to the upside.</p>\n<p>If Apple’s stock can maintain its upward trajectory, it should reach the gap on the chart in the $332 range.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/47d8509797994274aeab774461a5bda2\" tg-width=\"1023\" tg-height=\"503\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><b>The Netflix Chart:</b> On April 1, Netflix’s stock broke bullish from the descending channel it had been trading in since Jan. 20, when the eight-day EMA and 21-day EMA crossed.</p>\n<p>Like both Amazon and Apple’s stock,&nbsp;it is currently extended from the EMAs, and on Thursday afternoon Netflix’s stock had difficulty getting over a resistance level of $557.39.</p>\n<p>If Netflix can push up over that resistance level, there is not a lot of further resistance in its way until it reaches its previous all-time high of $593.95.</p>\n<p><b>AMZN, AAPL, NFLX&nbsp;Price Action:</b>&nbsp;Shares of Amazon&nbsp;were trading 0.64% higher at $3,300.26 ahead of the close Thursday.</p>\n<p>Apple shares were up 1.81% at $130.21.</p>\n<p>Netflix shares were gaining 1.2% at $553.58.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>3 FAANG Stock Laggards Look For A Return To Highs</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n3 FAANG Stock Laggards Look For A Return To Highs\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Benzinga </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-04-09 07:51</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9a40c2221442aec560e8e6188688ad14\" tg-width=\"600\" tg-height=\"400\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p><b>Amazon.com Inc</b> (NASDAQ: AMZN), <b>Apple Inc</b> (NASDAQ: AAPL) and <b>Netflix Inc</b> (NASDAQ: NFLX) have been lagging their FAANG counterparts.</p>\n<p>After retracing 18%, 21% and 17%, respectively, from&nbsp;all-time highs, none of the stocks has made a run at an all-time high, as is the case with&nbsp;<b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FB\">Facebook</a> Inc</b> (NASDAQ: FB) and <b>Alphabet Inc</b> (NASDAQ: GOOG) (NASDAQ: GOOGL).</p>\n<p>This could change, however, as the Nasdaq 100 has had a bullish seven trading sessions and looks to be working its way back toward the all-time high of 13,909.80 it made on Feb. 16.</p>\n<p><b>The Amazon Chart:</b> On Thursday, Amazon broke above the bullish descending channel it had been trading in since Sept. 2, 2020.</p>\n<p>On April 1, the eight-day exponential moving average (EMA) crossed above the 21-day EMA, which is bullish, and Amazon’s stock has been trading above both commonly followed EMAs ever since.</p>\n<p>Although it appears somewhat extended from the EMAs on the daily chart —&nbsp;meaning it may need some daily consolidation so the EMAs can catch up to Amazon’s price —&nbsp;the stock looks to be headed towards it&nbsp;next resistance level of around $3,342.</p>\n<p>If Amazon’s stock can rise above the next resistance level, it could&nbsp;make its way back toward&nbsp;its all-time high of $3,552.25.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c7aa3dc9961d332b9c3debad9c1d942b\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><b>The Apple Chart:</b> On Wednesday, Apple’s stock broke above its resistance level of $127.28 after getting follow-through from a bullish inverted head-and-shoulder pattern.</p>\n<p>It is trading above both the eight-day and 21-day EMAs, which crossed back on April 5 but&nbsp;like Amazon’s stock, it is extended from the EMAs and may need consolidation before a stronger push to the upside.</p>\n<p>If Apple’s stock can maintain its upward trajectory, it should reach the gap on the chart in the $332 range.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/47d8509797994274aeab774461a5bda2\" tg-width=\"1023\" tg-height=\"503\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><b>The Netflix Chart:</b> On April 1, Netflix’s stock broke bullish from the descending channel it had been trading in since Jan. 20, when the eight-day EMA and 21-day EMA crossed.</p>\n<p>Like both Amazon and Apple’s stock,&nbsp;it is currently extended from the EMAs, and on Thursday afternoon Netflix’s stock had difficulty getting over a resistance level of $557.39.</p>\n<p>If Netflix can push up over that resistance level, there is not a lot of further resistance in its way until it reaches its previous all-time high of $593.95.</p>\n<p><b>AMZN, AAPL, NFLX&nbsp;Price Action:</b>&nbsp;Shares of Amazon&nbsp;were trading 0.64% higher at $3,300.26 ahead of the close Thursday.</p>\n<p>Apple shares were up 1.81% at $130.21.</p>\n<p>Netflix shares were gaining 1.2% at $553.58.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果","NFLX":"奈飞","AMZN":"亚马逊","09086":"华夏纳指-U","QNETCN":"纳斯达克中美互联网老虎指数","03086":"华夏纳指"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2126274701","content_text":"Amazon.com Inc (NASDAQ: AMZN), Apple Inc (NASDAQ: AAPL) and Netflix Inc (NASDAQ: NFLX) have been lagging their FAANG counterparts.\nAfter retracing 18%, 21% and 17%, respectively, from all-time highs, none of the stocks has made a run at an all-time high, as is the case with Facebook Inc (NASDAQ: FB) and Alphabet Inc (NASDAQ: GOOG) (NASDAQ: GOOGL).\nThis could change, however, as the Nasdaq 100 has had a bullish seven trading sessions and looks to be working its way back toward the all-time high of 13,909.80 it made on Feb. 16.\nThe Amazon Chart: On Thursday, Amazon broke above the bullish descending channel it had been trading in since Sept. 2, 2020.\nOn April 1, the eight-day exponential moving average (EMA) crossed above the 21-day EMA, which is bullish, and Amazon’s stock has been trading above both commonly followed EMAs ever since.\nAlthough it appears somewhat extended from the EMAs on the daily chart — meaning it may need some daily consolidation so the EMAs can catch up to Amazon’s price — the stock looks to be headed towards it next resistance level of around $3,342.\nIf Amazon’s stock can rise above the next resistance level, it could make its way back toward its all-time high of $3,552.25.\nThe Apple Chart: On Wednesday, Apple’s stock broke above its resistance level of $127.28 after getting follow-through from a bullish inverted head-and-shoulder pattern.\nIt is trading above both the eight-day and 21-day EMAs, which crossed back on April 5 but like Amazon’s stock, it is extended from the EMAs and may need consolidation before a stronger push to the upside.\nIf Apple’s stock can maintain its upward trajectory, it should reach the gap on the chart in the $332 range.\nThe Netflix Chart: On April 1, Netflix’s stock broke bullish from the descending channel it had been trading in since Jan. 20, when the eight-day EMA and 21-day EMA crossed.\nLike both Amazon and Apple’s stock, it is currently extended from the EMAs, and on Thursday afternoon Netflix’s stock had difficulty getting over a resistance level of $557.39.\nIf Netflix can push up over that resistance level, there is not a lot of further resistance in its way until it reaches its previous all-time high of $593.95.\nAMZN, AAPL, NFLX Price Action: Shares of Amazon were trading 0.64% higher at $3,300.26 ahead of the close Thursday.\nApple shares were up 1.81% at $130.21.\nNetflix shares were gaining 1.2% at $553.58.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":23,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":374003855,"gmtCreate":1619399911977,"gmtModify":1704723209823,"author":{"id":"3557272953214384","authorId":"3557272953214384","name":"WGSsss","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c859daf551024a3f95b178c72e1b8354","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3557272953214384","authorIdStr":"3557272953214384"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"good","listText":"good","text":"good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/374003855","repostId":"1155008857","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1155008857","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1619399210,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1155008857?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-04-26 09:06","market":"sg","language":"en","title":"Hong Kong-Singapore Air Travel Bubble to Start on May 26","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1155008857","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"Agreement will allow quarantine-free travel between two hubs\nOriginal announcement last week cancele","content":"<ul>\n <li>Agreement will allow quarantine-free travel between two hubs</li>\n <li>Original announcement last week canceled by Singapore</li>\n</ul>\n<p>Hong Kong and Singapore will announce a start to their highly anticipated two-way air travel bubble as soon as Monday, according to people familiar with the matter, after multiple delays.</p>\n<p>Flights under the agreement -- which allows people to travel quarantine free between the financial hubs -- will begin from May 26, said the people, who asked not to be identified as they’re not authorized to speak publicly. The number of flights will be increased by June 26 if there aren’t further outbreaks in either city, one of the people said.</p>\n<p>Hong Kong and Singapore have been working on the creation of a travel corridor for months after plans for a November start were&nbsp;shelved&nbsp;due to a virus flareup in the Chinese territory. A plan to announce its revival last week was also&nbsp;canceled&nbsp;at the last minute by the Singapore side, people familiar with the matter said at the time.</p>\n<p>The Hong Kong government said a discussion with Singapore on the re-launch “is at an advance stage and the government will make announcement as soon as practicable.” Singapore’s transport ministry referred Bloomberg News to its most recent&nbsp;press release&nbsp;on the matter. Singapore last week said the two cities had not fixed a date to announce the resumption of the bubble, but “will do so once we are ready, hopefully very soon.”</p>\n<p>While Covid-19 cases in the two places pale in comparison to many countries, strict requirements for the bubble to open meant outbreaks that would be regarded&nbsp;as small elsewhere&nbsp;were enough to halt progress.</p>\n<p>Virus flareups in Hong Kong were the main reason for the months of delays. Now, after stemming a March outbreak centered on a gym, Hong Kong has been reporting only a handful of new infections a day, or low double-digits at most. Chief Executive Carrie Lam said on April 12 that the virus was “obviously contained” in the city and encouraged more people to get vaccinated,dangling the prospect&nbsp;of looser rules on social distancing for those who were inoculated. Singapore averaged two new cases per week recently.</p>\n<p>Sporadic outbreaks also complicated a travel bubble between Australia and New Zealand. After many months in the making, a quarantine-free flight corridor between those two countries -- which have largely eliminated the virus due to strict border curbs -- opened on April 19.</p>\n<p>The Hong Kong-Singapore agreement should unleash a torrent of pent-up demand from people eager to fly overseas and potentially do business in person after more than a year of the pandemic, though it is unclear yet the limited number of flights or seats that will be made available. The desire to travel in any way possible is reflected in the popularity of so-called&nbsp;cruises to nowhere&nbsp;in Singapore and tickets selling out for gimmicky dinners on parked aircraft.</p>\n<p>Under previous travel bubble plans, flights will be operated by&nbsp;Singapore Airlines Ltd.&nbsp;and&nbsp;Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd.The two airlines have been&nbsp;hammered&nbsp;by Covid-19 as they don’t have domestic markets to compensate for a near-total collapse in international travel. Latest data show Cathay flew just 598 passengers a day on average in March as it operated a&nbsp;skeleton schedule&nbsp;to only 18 destinations. Singapore Airlines’ numbers are also just a tiny fraction of pre-pandemic levels.</p>","source":"lsy1584095487587","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Hong Kong-Singapore Air Travel Bubble to Start on May 26</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHong Kong-Singapore Air Travel Bubble to Start on May 26\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-04-26 09:06 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-04-25/hong-kong-singapore-air-travel-bubble-said-to-start-on-may-26><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Agreement will allow quarantine-free travel between two hubs\nOriginal announcement last week canceled by Singapore\n\nHong Kong and Singapore will announce a start to their highly anticipated two-way ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-04-25/hong-kong-singapore-air-travel-bubble-said-to-start-on-may-26\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"00293":"国泰航空","C6L.SI":"新加坡航空公司"},"source_url":"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-04-25/hong-kong-singapore-air-travel-bubble-said-to-start-on-may-26","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1155008857","content_text":"Agreement will allow quarantine-free travel between two hubs\nOriginal announcement last week canceled by Singapore\n\nHong Kong and Singapore will announce a start to their highly anticipated two-way air travel bubble as soon as Monday, according to people familiar with the matter, after multiple delays.\nFlights under the agreement -- which allows people to travel quarantine free between the financial hubs -- will begin from May 26, said the people, who asked not to be identified as they’re not authorized to speak publicly. The number of flights will be increased by June 26 if there aren’t further outbreaks in either city, one of the people said.\nHong Kong and Singapore have been working on the creation of a travel corridor for months after plans for a November start were shelved due to a virus flareup in the Chinese territory. A plan to announce its revival last week was also canceled at the last minute by the Singapore side, people familiar with the matter said at the time.\nThe Hong Kong government said a discussion with Singapore on the re-launch “is at an advance stage and the government will make announcement as soon as practicable.” Singapore’s transport ministry referred Bloomberg News to its most recent press release on the matter. Singapore last week said the two cities had not fixed a date to announce the resumption of the bubble, but “will do so once we are ready, hopefully very soon.”\nWhile Covid-19 cases in the two places pale in comparison to many countries, strict requirements for the bubble to open meant outbreaks that would be regarded as small elsewhere were enough to halt progress.\nVirus flareups in Hong Kong were the main reason for the months of delays. Now, after stemming a March outbreak centered on a gym, Hong Kong has been reporting only a handful of new infections a day, or low double-digits at most. Chief Executive Carrie Lam said on April 12 that the virus was “obviously contained” in the city and encouraged more people to get vaccinated,dangling the prospect of looser rules on social distancing for those who were inoculated. Singapore averaged two new cases per week recently.\nSporadic outbreaks also complicated a travel bubble between Australia and New Zealand. After many months in the making, a quarantine-free flight corridor between those two countries -- which have largely eliminated the virus due to strict border curbs -- opened on April 19.\nThe Hong Kong-Singapore agreement should unleash a torrent of pent-up demand from people eager to fly overseas and potentially do business in person after more than a year of the pandemic, though it is unclear yet the limited number of flights or seats that will be made available. The desire to travel in any way possible is reflected in the popularity of so-called cruises to nowhere in Singapore and tickets selling out for gimmicky dinners on parked aircraft.\nUnder previous travel bubble plans, flights will be operated by Singapore Airlines Ltd. and Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd.The two airlines have been hammered by Covid-19 as they don’t have domestic markets to compensate for a near-total collapse in international travel. Latest data show Cathay flew just 598 passengers a day on average in March as it operated a skeleton schedule to only 18 destinations. Singapore Airlines’ numbers are also just a tiny fraction of pre-pandemic levels.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":126,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":371020353,"gmtCreate":1618893825272,"gmtModify":1704716480630,"author":{"id":"3557272953214384","authorId":"3557272953214384","name":"WGSsss","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c859daf551024a3f95b178c72e1b8354","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3557272953214384","authorIdStr":"3557272953214384"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"good","listText":"good","text":"good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/371020353","repostId":"1169365498","repostType":2,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":44,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":379834482,"gmtCreate":1618714156446,"gmtModify":1704714239568,"author":{"id":"3557272953214384","authorId":"3557272953214384","name":"WGSsss","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c859daf551024a3f95b178c72e1b8354","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3557272953214384","authorIdStr":"3557272953214384"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/379834482","repostId":"1175692875","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1175692875","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1618582708,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1175692875?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-04-16 22:18","market":"us","language":"en","title":"$544 Billion In Options Expire Today: Here's What Will Move","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1175692875","media":"zerohedge","summary":"While it's not quad (or even triple) witching day, today's a whole lot of weekly options will expire","content":"<p>While it's not quad (or even triple) witching day, today's a whole lot of weekly options will expire, may of which will be worthless, and others will be providing a supporting \"pin\" to underlying prices. It's why, even though we are enjoying a beautiful spring week, Goldman notes that single stock options trading activity is elevated relative to historical levels. To wit, daily options volumes are up 70% in April, up from YTD lows of $2.4bn on 30-Mar.</p><p><b>In total, across single stocks, $544BN of options are set to expiry today, including $305BN calls.</b>As such, today’s expiry could be important for stocks with large open interest in at-the-money(ATM) options, as market makers delta-hedging their unusually large options portfolios will be active. This flow is likely to dampen volatility in some names while exacerbating stock price moves in others.</p><p>How to trade this?</p><p>As Goldman's Vishal Vivek writes, at major expirations, options traders track situations where<b>a large amount of open interest is set to expire.</b>In situations where there is a significant amount of expiring open interest in at-the-money strikes (strike prices at or very near the current stockprice), delta-hedging activity can impact the underlying stock’s trading that day. If market makers or other options traders who delta-hedge their positions are net long ATM options, expiration-related flow could have the effect of dampening stock price movements, causing the stock price to settle near the strike with large open interest. This situation is often referred to as a “pin” and can be an ideal situation fora large investor trying to enter/exit a stock position. Alternatively, if delta-hedgers are net short ATM options (have a “negative gamma” position), their hedging activity could exacerbate stock price moves.</p><p>What that means it expiration-related trades may cause trading activity to aggressively pick up for stocks with a significant amount of ATM open interest.</p><p>So to help traders looking to hop on for daytrading opportunities, here is a table identifying possible focus stocks with large ATM open interest expiring today, which is compared to the average daily volume of the underlying stocks. As Goldman puts it, \"<i>expiration-related activity is likely to have more of an impact if the open interest represents a significant percentage of the stock’s volume.\"</i></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0dac61cb87c2f2700d8a0e8e64324f81\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"638\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">Finally, for what it's worth, this morning our friends at SpotGamma write that this has been a rather strange OPEX cycle, \"with a consistent almost mechanical bid pushing markets higher. We’ve not seen the Call Wall “breached” this many times before, but there are other aberrations that we’ve mentioned in previous notes – like net put sales. We’ve got some theories on this we are posting in a longer form piece.\"</p><p>According to SG, because implied volatility has now compressed (ie VIX at new lows) there is now more potential for “long term” volatility. Recall how as of late any sharp, violent drop in markets was bought so quickly (see chart below).<b>These bursts lower coincided with record VIX spikes, but a reflective snap-back bid would bring a market recovery of equal force as the VIX&nbsp; (i.e. implied volatility) reversed.</b></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ae7a60d873792b825bdda669cafa0ed3\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"297\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">And one other curious observation from SpotGamma:</p><blockquote>When implied volatility is very high, its very sensitive to market moves and also signaling that markets are expecting more large moves ahead. As soon as markets would pause or catch a support level, that implied volatility would quickly reverse lower. <b>We often think of this analogy that if a shark stops swimming, it sinks ( partially true!). If the market stops dropping then Implied volatility sinks.</b></blockquote><p>With this, as we often talk about, lower implied volatility (ie lower VIX) signals market makers have to buy back short hedges which fuels rallies. SG's conclusion: this current level of lower implied volatility now gives the market more downside firepower.&nbsp; Starting with a lower implied volatility “slows down” that responsive “snap-back” buying mechanism.&nbsp; Additionally, gamma is higher when IV is lower so gamma flips may have more juice.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>$544 Billion In Options Expire Today: Here's What Will Move</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n$544 Billion In Options Expire Today: Here's What Will Move\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-04-16 22:18 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/544-billion-options-expire-today-heres-what-will-move?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29><strong>zerohedge</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>While it's not quad (or even triple) witching day, today's a whole lot of weekly options will expire, may of which will be worthless, and others will be providing a supporting \"pin\" to underlying ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/544-billion-options-expire-today-heres-what-will-move?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","SPY":"标普500ETF",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/544-billion-options-expire-today-heres-what-will-move?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1175692875","content_text":"While it's not quad (or even triple) witching day, today's a whole lot of weekly options will expire, may of which will be worthless, and others will be providing a supporting \"pin\" to underlying prices. It's why, even though we are enjoying a beautiful spring week, Goldman notes that single stock options trading activity is elevated relative to historical levels. To wit, daily options volumes are up 70% in April, up from YTD lows of $2.4bn on 30-Mar.In total, across single stocks, $544BN of options are set to expiry today, including $305BN calls.As such, today’s expiry could be important for stocks with large open interest in at-the-money(ATM) options, as market makers delta-hedging their unusually large options portfolios will be active. This flow is likely to dampen volatility in some names while exacerbating stock price moves in others.How to trade this?As Goldman's Vishal Vivek writes, at major expirations, options traders track situations wherea large amount of open interest is set to expire.In situations where there is a significant amount of expiring open interest in at-the-money strikes (strike prices at or very near the current stockprice), delta-hedging activity can impact the underlying stock’s trading that day. If market makers or other options traders who delta-hedge their positions are net long ATM options, expiration-related flow could have the effect of dampening stock price movements, causing the stock price to settle near the strike with large open interest. This situation is often referred to as a “pin” and can be an ideal situation fora large investor trying to enter/exit a stock position. Alternatively, if delta-hedgers are net short ATM options (have a “negative gamma” position), their hedging activity could exacerbate stock price moves.What that means it expiration-related trades may cause trading activity to aggressively pick up for stocks with a significant amount of ATM open interest.So to help traders looking to hop on for daytrading opportunities, here is a table identifying possible focus stocks with large ATM open interest expiring today, which is compared to the average daily volume of the underlying stocks. As Goldman puts it, \"expiration-related activity is likely to have more of an impact if the open interest represents a significant percentage of the stock’s volume.\"Finally, for what it's worth, this morning our friends at SpotGamma write that this has been a rather strange OPEX cycle, \"with a consistent almost mechanical bid pushing markets higher. We’ve not seen the Call Wall “breached” this many times before, but there are other aberrations that we’ve mentioned in previous notes – like net put sales. We’ve got some theories on this we are posting in a longer form piece.\"According to SG, because implied volatility has now compressed (ie VIX at new lows) there is now more potential for “long term” volatility. Recall how as of late any sharp, violent drop in markets was bought so quickly (see chart below).These bursts lower coincided with record VIX spikes, but a reflective snap-back bid would bring a market recovery of equal force as the VIX  (i.e. implied volatility) reversed.And one other curious observation from SpotGamma:When implied volatility is very high, its very sensitive to market moves and also signaling that markets are expecting more large moves ahead. As soon as markets would pause or catch a support level, that implied volatility would quickly reverse lower. We often think of this analogy that if a shark stops swimming, it sinks ( partially true!). If the market stops dropping then Implied volatility sinks.With this, as we often talk about, lower implied volatility (ie lower VIX) signals market makers have to buy back short hedges which fuels rallies. SG's conclusion: this current level of lower implied volatility now gives the market more downside firepower.  Starting with a lower implied volatility “slows down” that responsive “snap-back” buying mechanism.  Additionally, gamma is higher when IV is lower so gamma flips may have more juice.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":86,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":370871509,"gmtCreate":1618577484101,"gmtModify":1704712973449,"author":{"id":"3557272953214384","authorId":"3557272953214384","name":"WGSsss","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c859daf551024a3f95b178c72e1b8354","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3557272953214384","authorIdStr":"3557272953214384"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/370871509","repostId":"1188808209","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1188808209","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Stock Market Quotes, Business News, Financial News, Trading Ideas, and Stock Research by Professionals","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Benzinga","id":"1052270027","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa"},"pubTimestamp":1618576908,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1188808209?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-04-16 20:41","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Here's Why Sunrun, Apple And Amazon Are Moving","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1188808209","media":"Benzinga","summary":"Analysts and brokerage firms often use ratings when they issue stock recommendations to stock trader","content":"<p>Analysts and brokerage firms often use ratings when they issue stock recommendations to stock traders. Analysts arrive at stock ratings by researching public financial statements, communicating with executives and customers&nbsp;and following industry trends.</p><p>Here are the latest analyst ratings and updates for Sunrun, Apple and Amazon.</p><p><b>Sunrun Inc</b>&nbsp;shares are trading higher by 4.3% in Friday’s premarket session after Piper Sandler analyst Kashy Harrison upgraded the solar company from Neutral to Overweight and announces a $77 price target.</p><p><b>Apple Inc</b>&nbsp;shares are trading higher by around 0.5% after <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSTLW\">Morgan Stanley</a> analyst Katy Huberty maintains the tech giant with an Overweight and raised the price target from $156 to $157.</p><p><b>Amazon.com, Inc.</b>&nbsp; shares are trading higher by around 0.5% after Credit Suisse analyst Stephen Ju maintains the FAANG stock with an Outperform and raises the price target from $3,940 to $3,950.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Here's Why Sunrun, Apple And Amazon Are Moving</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHere's Why Sunrun, Apple And Amazon Are Moving\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Benzinga </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-04-16 20:41</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Analysts and brokerage firms often use ratings when they issue stock recommendations to stock traders. Analysts arrive at stock ratings by researching public financial statements, communicating with executives and customers&nbsp;and following industry trends.</p><p>Here are the latest analyst ratings and updates for Sunrun, Apple and Amazon.</p><p><b>Sunrun Inc</b>&nbsp;shares are trading higher by 4.3% in Friday’s premarket session after Piper Sandler analyst Kashy Harrison upgraded the solar company from Neutral to Overweight and announces a $77 price target.</p><p><b>Apple Inc</b>&nbsp;shares are trading higher by around 0.5% after <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSTLW\">Morgan Stanley</a> analyst Katy Huberty maintains the tech giant with an Overweight and raised the price target from $156 to $157.</p><p><b>Amazon.com, Inc.</b>&nbsp; shares are trading higher by around 0.5% after Credit Suisse analyst Stephen Ju maintains the FAANG stock with an Outperform and raises the price target from $3,940 to $3,950.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"RUN":"Sunrun Inc.","AAPL":"苹果","AMZN":"亚马逊"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1188808209","content_text":"Analysts and brokerage firms often use ratings when they issue stock recommendations to stock traders. Analysts arrive at stock ratings by researching public financial statements, communicating with executives and customers and following industry trends.Here are the latest analyst ratings and updates for Sunrun, Apple and Amazon.Sunrun Inc shares are trading higher by 4.3% in Friday’s premarket session after Piper Sandler analyst Kashy Harrison upgraded the solar company from Neutral to Overweight and announces a $77 price target.Apple Inc shares are trading higher by around 0.5% after Morgan Stanley analyst Katy Huberty maintains the tech giant with an Overweight and raised the price target from $156 to $157.Amazon.com, Inc.  shares are trading higher by around 0.5% after Credit Suisse analyst Stephen Ju maintains the FAANG stock with an Outperform and raises the price target from $3,940 to $3,950.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":92,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":354745474,"gmtCreate":1617203449498,"gmtModify":1704697290183,"author":{"id":"3557272953214384","authorId":"3557272953214384","name":"WGSsss","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c859daf551024a3f95b178c72e1b8354","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3557272953214384","authorIdStr":"3557272953214384"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"good","listText":"good","text":"good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/354745474","repostId":"2123240433","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2123240433","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1617175920,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2123240433?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-03-31 15:32","market":"sh","language":"en","title":"Exclusive: China considering new bourse to attract overseas-listed firms","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2123240433","media":"Reuters","summary":"HONG KONG (Reuters) - China is considering establishing a stock exchange to attract overseas-listed ","content":"<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6a2aec2f17166faf15866f85301330c7\" tg-width=\"200\" tg-height=\"132\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>HONG KONG (Reuters) - China is considering establishing a stock exchange to attract overseas-listed firms and bolster the global status of its onshore share markets, two people with knowledge of the matter told Reuters.</p><p>The country's State Council has asked the top securities regulator to lead studies on how to design the exchange that would target Chinese firms listed in offshore markets such as Hong Kong and the United States, said the people.</p><p>The government hopes the initiative would also lure marquee global firms such as Apple Inc and Tesla Inc, which would have the option of carving out local businesses and listing them on the new bourse, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE\">one</a> of the people said.</p><p>The plan comes as Beijing and Washington remain locked in a rivalry that has featured moves by the U.S. securities regulator toward expelling Chinese companies from U.S. exchanges if they do not comply with U.S. auditing standards.</p><p>About 13 U.S.-listed Chinese firms including Alibaba Group Holding Ltd, Baidu Inc and JD.com Inc have conducted secondary listings worth a combined $36 billion in Hong Kong over the past 16 months, Refinitiv data showed.</p><p>With Sino-U.S. relations showing little sign of easing, bankers and investors expect more such \"homecoming\" offerings.</p><p>Talks for the new exchange are in early stages and a time frame and location are yet to be decided, said the people, who declined to be identified as the discussions are confidential.</p><p>The China Securities Regulatory Commission did not respond to a Reuters' request for comment.</p><p>China has two main onshore exchanges, in Shanghai and Shenzhen, with combined listed market capitalisation of 78.7 trillion yuan ($12 trillion).</p><p>The same rules govern initial public offerings as well as non-initial listings, in contrast to some other leading bourses, such as Hong Kong's, which offer waivers for secondary listings.</p><p>One option under discussion is upgrading an existing listing platform such as a smaller bourse in Beijing, said the people.</p><p>Beijing's municipal government has been lobbying for years to upgrade its equity exchange for small and mid-sized firms, known as the \"New Third Board\", to be home to U.S.-listed Chinese firms, said <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> of the people and three other sources.</p><p>The securities regulator and a few government bodies have for about six month been studying the feasibility of such an upgrade, for which there is a \"50-50\" chance of adoption, said one of the three sources.</p><p>In a meeting with regulators and institutions in February, Cai Qi, head of Beijing city's Communist Party, called for the capital to lead financial reform and develop a modern financial industry, the official Beijing Daily reported.</p><p>The Beijing government's media office did not respond to Reuters' requests for comment.</p><p>($1 = 6.5623 Chinese yuan)</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Exclusive: China considering new bourse to attract overseas-listed firms</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nExclusive: China considering new bourse to attract overseas-listed firms\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-03-31 15:32 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.streetinsider.com/dr/news.php?id=18200096><strong>Reuters</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>HONG KONG (Reuters) - China is considering establishing a stock exchange to attract overseas-listed firms and bolster the global status of its onshore share markets, two people with knowledge of the ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.streetinsider.com/dr/news.php?id=18200096\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6a2aec2f17166faf15866f85301330c7","relate_stocks":{"399001":"深证成指","399006":"创业板指","000001.SH":"上证指数","HSI":"恒生指数"},"source_url":"https://www.streetinsider.com/dr/news.php?id=18200096","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2123240433","content_text":"HONG KONG (Reuters) - China is considering establishing a stock exchange to attract overseas-listed firms and bolster the global status of its onshore share markets, two people with knowledge of the matter told Reuters.The country's State Council has asked the top securities regulator to lead studies on how to design the exchange that would target Chinese firms listed in offshore markets such as Hong Kong and the United States, said the people.The government hopes the initiative would also lure marquee global firms such as Apple Inc and Tesla Inc, which would have the option of carving out local businesses and listing them on the new bourse, one of the people said.The plan comes as Beijing and Washington remain locked in a rivalry that has featured moves by the U.S. securities regulator toward expelling Chinese companies from U.S. exchanges if they do not comply with U.S. auditing standards.About 13 U.S.-listed Chinese firms including Alibaba Group Holding Ltd, Baidu Inc and JD.com Inc have conducted secondary listings worth a combined $36 billion in Hong Kong over the past 16 months, Refinitiv data showed.With Sino-U.S. relations showing little sign of easing, bankers and investors expect more such \"homecoming\" offerings.Talks for the new exchange are in early stages and a time frame and location are yet to be decided, said the people, who declined to be identified as the discussions are confidential.The China Securities Regulatory Commission did not respond to a Reuters' request for comment.China has two main onshore exchanges, in Shanghai and Shenzhen, with combined listed market capitalisation of 78.7 trillion yuan ($12 trillion).The same rules govern initial public offerings as well as non-initial listings, in contrast to some other leading bourses, such as Hong Kong's, which offer waivers for secondary listings.One option under discussion is upgrading an existing listing platform such as a smaller bourse in Beijing, said the people.Beijing's municipal government has been lobbying for years to upgrade its equity exchange for small and mid-sized firms, known as the \"New Third Board\", to be home to U.S.-listed Chinese firms, said one of the people and three other sources.The securities regulator and a few government bodies have for about six month been studying the feasibility of such an upgrade, for which there is a \"50-50\" chance of adoption, said one of the three sources.In a meeting with regulators and institutions in February, Cai Qi, head of Beijing city's Communist Party, called for the capital to lead financial reform and develop a modern financial industry, the official Beijing Daily reported.The Beijing government's media office did not respond to Reuters' requests for comment.($1 = 6.5623 Chinese yuan)","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":17,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":102335782,"gmtCreate":1620176944046,"gmtModify":1704339736081,"author":{"id":"3557272953214384","authorId":"3557272953214384","name":"WGSsss","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c859daf551024a3f95b178c72e1b8354","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3557272953214384","authorIdStr":"3557272953214384"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"good","listText":"good","text":"good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/102335782","repostId":"1199199416","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1199199416","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1620173020,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1199199416?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-05-05 08:03","market":"us","language":"en","title":"S&P 500 ends day 0.7% lower, Nasdaq sheds nearly 2% for worst day since March","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1199199416","media":"CNBC","summary":"The S&P 500 fell on Tuesday amid selling in Big Tech and other high-growth stocks, erasing the bench","content":"<div>\n<p>The S&P 500 fell on Tuesday amid selling in Big Tech and other high-growth stocks, erasing the benchmark’s strong start to the month.The broad market index closed the session 0.7% lower at 4,164.66 ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/05/03/stock-market-futures-open-to-close-new.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"cnbc_highlight","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>S&P 500 ends day 0.7% lower, Nasdaq sheds nearly 2% for worst day since March</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nS&P 500 ends day 0.7% lower, Nasdaq sheds nearly 2% for worst day since March\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-05-05 08:03 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.cnbc.com/2021/05/03/stock-market-futures-open-to-close-new.html><strong>CNBC</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The S&P 500 fell on Tuesday amid selling in Big Tech and other high-growth stocks, erasing the benchmark’s strong start to the month.The broad market index closed the session 0.7% lower at 4,164.66 ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/05/03/stock-market-futures-open-to-close-new.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"161125":"标普500","513500":"标普500ETF","PSQ":"纳指反向ETF","QLD":"纳指两倍做多ETF","TSLA":"特斯拉","UPRO":"三倍做多标普500ETF","PFE":"辉瑞",".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite","AAPL":"苹果",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","SPXU":"三倍做空标普500ETF","SQQQ":"纳指三倍做空ETF","NDAQ":"纳斯达克OMX交易所","SH":"标普500反向ETF","IVV":"标普500指数ETF","BRK.A":"伯克希尔","OEF":"标普100指数ETF-iShares","SPY":"标普500ETF","QQQ":"纳指100ETF","SDS":"两倍做空标普500ETF","BRK.B":"伯克希尔B","QID":"纳指两倍做空ETF","CVS":"西维斯健康","GOOG":"谷歌","CLX":"高乐氏","TQQQ":"纳指三倍做多ETF","GOOGL":"谷歌A"},"source_url":"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/05/03/stock-market-futures-open-to-close-new.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/72bb72e1b84c09fca865c6dcb1bbcd16","article_id":"1199199416","content_text":"The S&P 500 fell on Tuesday amid selling in Big Tech and other high-growth stocks, erasing the benchmark’s strong start to the month.The broad market index closed the session 0.7% lower at 4,164.66 after dropping 1.5% at its low. Pressure on some of the globe’s largest technology companies sent the Nasdaq Composite down 1.9% to 13,633.50 for its worst day since March.Apple, the largest publicly traded company in the U.S., fell 3.5%. Google-parent Alphabet lost 1.6%, Facebook shed 1.3% and electric car maker Tesla dropped 1.7%. Investors did not spare the market’s chipmakers, with Nvidia and Intel losing 3.3% and 0.6%, respectively.The Dow Jones Industrial Average ended the day in the green thanks to strong performance in Dow Inc and Caterpillar. The 30-stock benchmark closed 19.8 points, or 0.1%, higher to 34,133.03 after dropping more than 300 points at one point Tuesday.Reasons for the downward pressure varied, but strategists cited a mix of concerns about rising inflation, fears the Federal Reserve may have to taper monetary stimulus earlier than telegraphed, and the potential for tax increases in the months ahead.U.S. equities hit their lows of the day following Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen’scomments that interest ratesmay have to rise somewhat to keep economy from overheating.Evercore ISI strategist Dennis DeBusschere wrote that while Tuesday’s modest move in rates may not be a loud siren that investors are worried about the Fed, he nonetheless believes taper fears are playing a role.“Best we can tell supply concerns are a major issue for investors and inflation / inflation expectations are becoming a headwind,” he wrote in an email. “Although Fed futures are pricing in a much faster pace of rate hikes vs what the Fed wants...that is not the story today. The story is inflation and stronger growth numbers leading to even more inflation given supply constraints and what that means for equities.”DeBusschere’s supply-side concerns join those of a growing number of executives and investors who say rising input prices are starting to erode profit margins.Warren Buffett, the CEO of Berkshire Hathaway, said during his company’s annual meeting over the weekend that he is seeing “very substantial inflation” and his companies are raising prices.Other companies, such as Clorox, have said in recent earnings reports that the prices they pay for the materials used to make their products are rising and could ultimately be passed on to customers. Commodity prices, from lumber to corn to palladium, have surged in recent months.Others have said that even blowout earnings results have been unable to quell marketplace jitters. Even accounting for Tuesday’s losses, the S&P 500 is still up more than 10% so far this year.“We have gone through a two to three week period that has seen really good news get little or no reaction in markets,” wrote Art Hogan, chief market strategist at National Securities. “Investors get uneasy at new highs, and there have been 25 new highs for the S&P 500 so far this year.”“There are concerns that the roaring 20′s economic explosion will take longer than just this summer as people slowly get comfortable getting out and about,” he added. “Equities look expensive on a trailing basis, but not from a forward looking viewpoint.”With the market at all-time highs, investors are torn between playing the reopening with shares like retailers or continuing to bet on Big Tech, which just reported blockbuster earnings.The move in equities followed solid gains for the Dow on Monday as investors piled into shares that would benefit the most from an economic reopening. The 30-stock benchmark rallied more than 200 points, while the S&P 500 inched up 0.3%. Retail stocks led the market advance on Monday with Gap and Macy’s rallying more than 7%.Pfizershares rose slightly following quarterly resultsthat beat expectations and raising its 2021 guidance.CVS Healthshares jumped 4.4% after the pharmacy chain and insurance companyalso raised its guidance.United States Steelpopped 7.9% after Credit Suisseupgradedthe stock to outperform from underperform, saying that the surge in prices for steel made it clear that the industry was in a “super cycle.”“Investors could be getting increasingly disappointed that stocks are not doing well in the face of fantastic earnings news,” Jim Paulsen, chief investment strategist at the Leuthold Group, told CNBC.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":68,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":100341791,"gmtCreate":1619584247013,"gmtModify":1704726356958,"author":{"id":"3557272953214384","authorId":"3557272953214384","name":"WGSsss","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c859daf551024a3f95b178c72e1b8354","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3557272953214384","authorIdStr":"3557272953214384"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/100341791","repostId":"1138757588","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1138757588","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1619579490,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1138757588?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-04-28 11:11","market":"hk","language":"en","title":"Reporting Deadline Looms for Scores of Hong Kong-Listed Firms","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1138757588","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"Halted ahead of deadline are 44 companies worth $19 billion\nSuspended companies risk losing index me","content":"<ul>\n <li>Halted ahead of deadline are 44 companies worth $19 billion</li>\n <li>Suspended companies risk losing index membership: analysts</li>\n</ul>\n<p>The clock is ticking for scores of Hong Kong-listed companies that look like they will miss a deadline to post their 2020 earnings reports.</p>\n<p>Mainland solar power maker&nbsp;GCL-Poly Energy Holdings Ltd.&nbsp;and Hainan Meilan International Airport Co., which operates an airport in China’s southernmost Hainan province, are among the more-than-40 Hong Kong-listed companies that are just days away from missing final deadlines to report their 2020 results.</p>\n<p>If they fail to meet the April 30 deadline, some of these 44 companies -- with a combined market value of HK$146.8 billion ($18.9 billion) -- risk losing key index membership status, according to analysts.</p>\n<p>At the very least, these Chinese companies will raise investor concerns about their financial health. They are already part of a slew suspended when they missed an earlier March 31 deadline for preliminary earnings.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/af5f7d78698e711235ea936b0ea24f73\" tg-width=\"944\" tg-height=\"581\"></p>\n<p>“Of course, investors in these stocks are worried about their financial situation,” said Louis Tse, Hong Kong-based managing director at VC Asset Management Ltd. “It’s difficult for their auditors to get enough information to form an opinion,” he added, saying the pandemic made it tough for auditors to travel and verify information in person, for instance.</p>\n<p>Unpaid debt or weak corporate governance could also be blamed for delayed audit reports, he said.</p>\n<p>Of the morethan 50 companies&nbsp;that missed the March 31 deadline for preliminary reporting, just seven have ended up releasing reports. Among them, mobile technology firm China Baoli Technologies Holdings Ltd. has halved since it resumed trading, while computer hardware firm Jiangsu Nandasoft Technology Co is down 24%.</p>\n<p>GCL-Poly Energy, Hainan Meilan International Airport and Asia Cement China Holdings Corp. are among the biggest of the 44 to have been suspended for failing to report on time. All three have said their auditors need more time to sign off on the results.</p>\n<p>China Huarong Asset Management Co Ltd., the embattled state-owned bad debt manager that recently faced a&nbsp;meltdown in its bonds, is the second-biggest among the halted companies. It had said it won’t report its earnings by the April 30 deadline, and was delaying its 2020 earnings because its auditors needed more time to finalize an unspecified transaction.</p>\n<p>In each of the past four years, no more than 10 companies have delayed their annual earnings reports. Numbers were small for delays even last year, when the pandemic disrupted business activities and in 2019 -- a year of&nbsp;pro-democracy protests&nbsp;in Hong Kong.</p>\n<p>Long-term trading suspensions by companies that fail to report their earnings on time have exposed problematic companies in the past. China Huiyuan Juice Group Ltd., once one of the nation’s biggest juice companies, had been suspended from trading from April 2018 after it failed to submit its 2017 results on time. The company was delisted in January this year.</p>\n<p>Kenny Wen, strategist at Everbright Sun Hung Kai Co., said there is a risk that some index compilers might review and remove shares that have been suspended for too long. Huarong is a member of the MSCI Emerging Markets Index, while both Huarong and GCL are in the Hang Seng Composite Index.</p>\n<p>“If index compilers remove stocks like Huarong from their indexes when these companies are suspended, there could be selling pressure when they resume trading,” Wen said.</p>\n<p>The Hong Kong stock exchange delists companies that have been suspended from trading for 18 months, although the firm can appeal in that period and actual delistings tend to be rare.</p>","source":"lsy1584095487587","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Reporting Deadline Looms for Scores of Hong Kong-Listed Firms</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nReporting Deadline Looms for Scores of Hong Kong-Listed Firms\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-04-28 11:11 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-04-28/reporting-deadline-looms-for-scores-of-hong-kong-listed-firms?srnd=premium-asia><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Halted ahead of deadline are 44 companies worth $19 billion\nSuspended companies risk losing index membership: analysts\n\nThe clock is ticking for scores of Hong Kong-listed companies that look like ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-04-28/reporting-deadline-looms-for-scores-of-hong-kong-listed-firms?srnd=premium-asia\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"HSCEI":"国企指数","HSTECH":"恒生科技指数","HSI":"恒生指数","HSCCI":"红筹指数"},"source_url":"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-04-28/reporting-deadline-looms-for-scores-of-hong-kong-listed-firms?srnd=premium-asia","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1138757588","content_text":"Halted ahead of deadline are 44 companies worth $19 billion\nSuspended companies risk losing index membership: analysts\n\nThe clock is ticking for scores of Hong Kong-listed companies that look like they will miss a deadline to post their 2020 earnings reports.\nMainland solar power maker GCL-Poly Energy Holdings Ltd. and Hainan Meilan International Airport Co., which operates an airport in China’s southernmost Hainan province, are among the more-than-40 Hong Kong-listed companies that are just days away from missing final deadlines to report their 2020 results.\nIf they fail to meet the April 30 deadline, some of these 44 companies -- with a combined market value of HK$146.8 billion ($18.9 billion) -- risk losing key index membership status, according to analysts.\nAt the very least, these Chinese companies will raise investor concerns about their financial health. They are already part of a slew suspended when they missed an earlier March 31 deadline for preliminary earnings.\n\n“Of course, investors in these stocks are worried about their financial situation,” said Louis Tse, Hong Kong-based managing director at VC Asset Management Ltd. “It’s difficult for their auditors to get enough information to form an opinion,” he added, saying the pandemic made it tough for auditors to travel and verify information in person, for instance.\nUnpaid debt or weak corporate governance could also be blamed for delayed audit reports, he said.\nOf the morethan 50 companies that missed the March 31 deadline for preliminary reporting, just seven have ended up releasing reports. Among them, mobile technology firm China Baoli Technologies Holdings Ltd. has halved since it resumed trading, while computer hardware firm Jiangsu Nandasoft Technology Co is down 24%.\nGCL-Poly Energy, Hainan Meilan International Airport and Asia Cement China Holdings Corp. are among the biggest of the 44 to have been suspended for failing to report on time. All three have said their auditors need more time to sign off on the results.\nChina Huarong Asset Management Co Ltd., the embattled state-owned bad debt manager that recently faced a meltdown in its bonds, is the second-biggest among the halted companies. It had said it won’t report its earnings by the April 30 deadline, and was delaying its 2020 earnings because its auditors needed more time to finalize an unspecified transaction.\nIn each of the past four years, no more than 10 companies have delayed their annual earnings reports. Numbers were small for delays even last year, when the pandemic disrupted business activities and in 2019 -- a year of pro-democracy protests in Hong Kong.\nLong-term trading suspensions by companies that fail to report their earnings on time have exposed problematic companies in the past. China Huiyuan Juice Group Ltd., once one of the nation’s biggest juice companies, had been suspended from trading from April 2018 after it failed to submit its 2017 results on time. The company was delisted in January this year.\nKenny Wen, strategist at Everbright Sun Hung Kai Co., said there is a risk that some index compilers might review and remove shares that have been suspended for too long. Huarong is a member of the MSCI Emerging Markets Index, while both Huarong and GCL are in the Hang Seng Composite Index.\n“If index compilers remove stocks like Huarong from their indexes when these companies are suspended, there could be selling pressure when they resume trading,” Wen said.\nThe Hong Kong stock exchange delists companies that have been suspended from trading for 18 months, although the firm can appeal in that period and actual delistings tend to be rare.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":162,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":322254404,"gmtCreate":1615813093708,"gmtModify":1704786889925,"author":{"id":"3557272953214384","authorId":"3557272953214384","name":"WGSsss","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c859daf551024a3f95b178c72e1b8354","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3557272953214384","authorIdStr":"3557272953214384"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/322254404","repostId":"2119917768","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2119917768","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1615812179,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2119917768?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-03-15 20:42","market":"us","language":"en","title":"'Mank' leads Oscar nominations with 10 nods","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2119917768","media":"Reuters","summary":"LOS ANGELES, March 15 (Reuters) - Netflix's Hollywood drama \"Mank\" led Oscar nominations on Monday w","content":"<html><body><p>LOS ANGELES, March 15 (Reuters) - Netflix's Hollywood drama \"Mank\" led Oscar nominations on Monday with 10 nods, including best picture. Other best picture nods went to \"The Father,  \"Judas and the Black Messiah,\" \"Minari, \"Nomadland\", \"Promising Young Woman\" \"Sound of Metal,\" and \"The Trial of the Chicago 7.\"</p><p> (Reporting by Jill Serjeant; editing by Jonathan Oatis)</p><p>((jill.serjeant1@thomsonreuters.com; 310 491 7279;))</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>'Mank' leads Oscar nominations with 10 nods</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n'Mank' leads Oscar nominations with 10 nods\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-03-15 20:42</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><body><p>LOS ANGELES, March 15 (Reuters) - Netflix's Hollywood drama \"Mank\" led Oscar nominations on Monday with 10 nods, including best picture. Other best picture nods went to \"The Father,  \"Judas and the Black Messiah,\" \"Minari, \"Nomadland\", \"Promising Young Woman\" \"Sound of Metal,\" and \"The Trial of the Chicago 7.\"</p><p> (Reporting by Jill Serjeant; editing by Jonathan Oatis)</p><p>((jill.serjeant1@thomsonreuters.com; 310 491 7279;))</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"DIS":"迪士尼","03086":"华夏纳指","AMZN":"亚马逊","QNETCN":"纳斯达克中美互联网老虎指数","NFLX":"奈飞","09086":"华夏纳指-U"},"source_url":"http://api.rkd.refinitiv.com/api/News/News.svc/REST/News_1/RetrieveStoryML_1","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2119917768","content_text":"LOS ANGELES, March 15 (Reuters) - Netflix's Hollywood drama \"Mank\" led Oscar nominations on Monday with 10 nods, including best picture. Other best picture nods went to \"The Father,  \"Judas and the Black Messiah,\" \"Minari, \"Nomadland\", \"Promising Young Woman\" \"Sound of Metal,\" and \"The Trial of the Chicago 7.\" (Reporting by Jill Serjeant; editing by Jonathan Oatis)((jill.serjeant1@thomsonreuters.com; 310 491 7279;))","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":8,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}