Hannee personal page - To The Moon

Hannee

Hannee

No personal profile

281Follow

9Followers

0Topic

0Badge

2021-09-07

$TENCENT(00700)$520 obviously is resistance to up further, as previously there is a big gap. If hit 520 above, next level would be 580. [Smile] [Happy]

2021-09-06

$TENCENT(00700)$IIf can hit 510 today, next trend is 530. Seems like no strength to up anymore today. Hope 330pm have more energy.

2021-08-27

$Cool Link(08491)$Liquidate ? How about my money all gone?

2021-08-07

$DBS GROUP HOLDINGS LTD(D05.SI)$Strong buy due to dividend declare high. May beit us time to sell after up so much this few days!

2021-07-31

$DBS GROUP HOLDINGS LTD(D05.SI)$ Drop in Friday due to investor cash out. Got chance for new wave, as old batch investor has left and cash out :)

2021-07-29

$DBS GROUP HOLDINGS LTD(D05.SI)$With the lifted of dividend payout, it is certainlyattract more investor. If can hit above last resistance of 30.80. Should be next TOP.

2021-07-21

$SINGAPORE AIRLINES LTD(C6L.SI)$This will drop more as positive cases increasing now!

2021-07-19

$EVERGRANDE(03333)$Omg! Government sure will take back this company!

2021-07-17

$Alibaba(09988)$Last minutes have 50m buying before market close, next Monday open high!

2021-07-15

$PING AN(02318)$Today all cash flow into 2318. Should be next wave soon!

2021-07-11

They must have R&d for battery. Or find byd

Apple AirPod batteries are almost impossible to replace, showing the need for right-to-repair reform

2021-07-04

??

Can Biden really protect Americans from the next crippling cyber attack?

2021-07-03

[Happy]

AMC Options Traders Aren't Discouraged, Repeatedly Hammer Calls

2021-06-28

Mean the next step is increase the interest soon!

The Fed’s inflation view could drag the economy into recession, El-Erian warns

2021-06-26

Sp500 is good indicator for stock rising.

S&P 500 climbs to another record led by bank shares, notches its best week since February

2021-06-24

Hope sp500 continue hit high!

S&P 500 rises to retake record at the open, wiping out last week’s Fed swoon

2021-06-24

Gg!!

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2021-06-22

She is powerful lady !

董小姐：你还能拿出什么来拯救格力？

2021-06-22

Why hdl drooped so much? China unlocked now. Consuming should boost up!

海底捞跌入海底

2021-06-20

My view is increasing the interest end of theyear. Finance industry have more chances. not now!

降息？那只是个美丽的误会

Go to Tiger App to see more news

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"userPageInfo":{"id":3557531278630339,"uuid":"3557531278630339","gmtCreate":1594437255927,"gmtModify":1638414107359,"name":"Hannee","pinyin":"hannee","introduction":"","introductionEn":"","signature":"","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2a23162818c1e2b051d79f5521b6ee57","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":9,"headSize":281,"tweetSize":48,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":3,"name":"书生虎","nameTw":"書生虎","represent":"努力向上","factor":"发布10条非转发主帖,其中5条获得他人回复或点赞","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":"success","userBadges":[{"badgeId":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493-3","templateUuid":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493","name":" Tiger Idol","description":"Join the tiger community for 1500 days","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8b40ae7da5bf081a1c84df14bf9e6367","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f160eceddd7c284a8e1136557615cfad","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/11792805c468334a9b31c39f95a41c6a","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2024.08.19","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"44212b71d0be4ec88898348dbe882e03-3","templateUuid":"44212b71d0be4ec88898348dbe882e03","name":"President Tiger","description":"The transaction amount of the securities account reaches $1,000,000","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fbeac6bb240db7da8b972e5183d050ba","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/436cdf80292b99f0a992e78750ac4e3a","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/506a259a7b456f037592c3b23c779599","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.07.14","exceedPercentage":"93.80%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1101},{"badgeId":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be-3","templateUuid":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be","name":"Legendary Trader","description":"Total number of securities or futures transactions reached 300","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/656db16598a0b8f21429e10d6c1cb033","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/03f10910d4dd9234f9b5702a3342193a","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0c767e35268feb729d50d3fa9a386c5a","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.28","exceedPercentage":"93.75%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100},{"badgeId":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789-1","templateUuid":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789","name":"Knowledgeable Investor","description":"Traded more than 10 stocks","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e74cc24115c4fbae6154ec1b1041bf47","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d48265cbfd97c57f9048db29f22227b0","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76c6d6898b073c77e1c537ebe9ac1c57","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1102},{"badgeId":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84-1","templateUuid":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84","name":"Real Trader","description":"Completed a transaction","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":5,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"location":null,"starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"post","tweets":[{"id":880003492,"gmtCreate":1630994570116,"gmtModify":1676530437605,"author":{"id":"3557531278630339","authorId":"3557531278630339","authorIdStr":"3557531278630339","name":"Hannee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2a23162818c1e2b051d79f5521b6ee57","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3557531278630339"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/00700\">$TENCENT(00700)$</a>520 obviously is resistance to up further, as previously there is a big gap. If hit 520 above, next level would be 580. [Smile]&nbsp;[Happy]&nbsp;","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/00700\">$TENCENT(00700)$</a>520 obviously is resistance to up further, as previously there is a big gap. If hit 520 above, next level would be 580. [Smile]&nbsp;[Happy]&nbsp;","text":"$TENCENT(00700)$520 obviously is resistance to up further, as previously there is a big gap. If hit 520 above, next level would be 580. [Smile] [Happy]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/880003492","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":563,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[{"author":{"id":"3578029344203599","authorId":"3578029344203599","authorIdStr":"3578029344203599","name":"relx分销者","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7eaa979376989e28bb9e6c34d588258a","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3578029344203599"},"content":"As long as Tencent continues to buy back, what is 520? If it doesn't buy back, it will face a callback of one to two weeks, to about 480","text":"As long as Tencent continues to buy back, what is 520? If it doesn't buy back, it will face a callback of one to two weeks, to about 480","html":"As long as Tencent continues to buy back, what is 520? If it doesn't buy back, it will face a callback of one to two weeks, to about 480"}],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":817381104,"gmtCreate":1630907415408,"gmtModify":1676530417916,"author":{"id":"3557531278630339","authorId":"3557531278630339","authorIdStr":"3557531278630339","name":"Hannee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2a23162818c1e2b051d79f5521b6ee57","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3557531278630339"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/00700\">$TENCENT(00700)$</a>IIf can hit 510 today, next trend is 530. Seems like no strength to up anymore today. Hope 330pm have more energy.&nbsp;","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/00700\">$TENCENT(00700)$</a>IIf can hit 510 today, next trend is 530. Seems like no strength to up anymore today. Hope 330pm have more energy.&nbsp;","text":"$TENCENT(00700)$IIf can hit 510 today, next trend is 530. Seems like no strength to up anymore today. Hope 330pm have more energy.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/817381104","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":454,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":819160842,"gmtCreate":1630045363686,"gmtModify":1676530209390,"author":{"id":"3557531278630339","authorId":"3557531278630339","authorIdStr":"3557531278630339","name":"Hannee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2a23162818c1e2b051d79f5521b6ee57","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3557531278630339"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/08491\">$Cool Link(08491)$</a>Liquidate ? How about my money all gone?","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/08491\">$Cool Link(08491)$</a>Liquidate ? How about my money all gone?","text":"$Cool Link(08491)$Liquidate ? How about my money all gone?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/819160842","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":441,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":891375273,"gmtCreate":1628343685892,"gmtModify":1703505253567,"author":{"id":"3557531278630339","authorId":"3557531278630339","authorIdStr":"3557531278630339","name":"Hannee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2a23162818c1e2b051d79f5521b6ee57","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3557531278630339"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/D05.SI\">$DBS GROUP HOLDINGS LTD(D05.SI)$</a>Strong buy due to dividend declare high. May beit us time to sell after up so much this few days!&nbsp;","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/D05.SI\">$DBS GROUP HOLDINGS LTD(D05.SI)$</a>Strong buy due to dividend declare high. May beit us time to sell after up so much this few days!&nbsp;","text":"$DBS GROUP HOLDINGS LTD(D05.SI)$Strong buy due to dividend declare high. May beit us time to sell after up so much this few days!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":8,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/891375273","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":312,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":802166732,"gmtCreate":1627735576926,"gmtModify":1703495343040,"author":{"id":"3557531278630339","authorId":"3557531278630339","authorIdStr":"3557531278630339","name":"Hannee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2a23162818c1e2b051d79f5521b6ee57","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3557531278630339"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/D05.SI\">$DBS GROUP HOLDINGS LTD(D05.SI)$</a> Drop in&nbsp;Friday due to investor cash out. Got chance for new wave, as old batch investor has left and cash out :)&nbsp;","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/D05.SI\">$DBS GROUP HOLDINGS LTD(D05.SI)$</a> Drop in&nbsp;Friday due to investor cash out. Got chance for new wave, as old batch investor has left and cash out :)&nbsp;","text":"$DBS GROUP HOLDINGS LTD(D05.SI)$ Drop in Friday due to investor cash out. Got chance for new wave, as old batch investor has left and cash out :)","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/802166732","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":191,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":808969506,"gmtCreate":1627551593905,"gmtModify":1703492185211,"author":{"id":"3557531278630339","authorId":"3557531278630339","authorIdStr":"3557531278630339","name":"Hannee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2a23162818c1e2b051d79f5521b6ee57","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3557531278630339"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/D05.SI\">$DBS GROUP HOLDINGS LTD(D05.SI)$</a>With the lifted of dividend payout, it is certainlyattract more investor. If can hit above last&nbsp;resistance of 30.80. Should be next TOP.&nbsp;&nbsp;","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/D05.SI\">$DBS GROUP HOLDINGS LTD(D05.SI)$</a>With the lifted of dividend payout, it is certainlyattract more investor. If can hit above last&nbsp;resistance of 30.80. Should be next TOP.&nbsp;&nbsp;","text":"$DBS GROUP HOLDINGS LTD(D05.SI)$With the lifted of dividend payout, it is certainlyattract more investor. If can hit above last resistance of 30.80. Should be next TOP.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/808969506","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":606,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":176675916,"gmtCreate":1626883193735,"gmtModify":1703479980595,"author":{"id":"3557531278630339","authorId":"3557531278630339","authorIdStr":"3557531278630339","name":"Hannee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2a23162818c1e2b051d79f5521b6ee57","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3557531278630339"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/C6L.SI\">$SINGAPORE AIRLINES LTD(C6L.SI)$</a>This will drop more as positive&nbsp;cases increasing now!&nbsp;","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/C6L.SI\">$SINGAPORE AIRLINES LTD(C6L.SI)$</a>This will drop more as positive&nbsp;cases increasing now!&nbsp;","text":"$SINGAPORE AIRLINES LTD(C6L.SI)$This will drop more as positive cases increasing now!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/176675916","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1107,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[{"author":{"id":"3571134598140592","authorId":"3571134598140592","authorIdStr":"3571134598140592","name":"DaddyBili","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/7473fb92a37534d1fd8b9979bb1800f4","crmLevel":7,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"idStr":"3571134598140592"},"content":"Haha it wont fall below $4.8","text":"Haha it wont fall below $4.8","html":"Haha it wont fall below $4.8"}],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":171368299,"gmtCreate":1626706891311,"gmtModify":1703763788104,"author":{"id":"3557531278630339","authorId":"3557531278630339","authorIdStr":"3557531278630339","name":"Hannee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2a23162818c1e2b051d79f5521b6ee57","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3557531278630339"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/03333\">$EVERGRANDE(03333)$</a>Omg! Government sure will take back this company!&nbsp;","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/03333\">$EVERGRANDE(03333)$</a>Omg! Government sure will take back this company!&nbsp;","text":"$EVERGRANDE(03333)$Omg! Government sure will take back this company!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/171368299","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":696,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":179623927,"gmtCreate":1626521075369,"gmtModify":1703761413542,"author":{"id":"3557531278630339","authorId":"3557531278630339","authorIdStr":"3557531278630339","name":"Hannee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2a23162818c1e2b051d79f5521b6ee57","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3557531278630339"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/09988\">$Alibaba(09988)$</a>Last minutes&nbsp;have 50m buying before market close, next&nbsp;Monday open high!&nbsp;","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/09988\">$Alibaba(09988)$</a>Last minutes&nbsp;have 50m buying before market close, next&nbsp;Monday open high!&nbsp;","text":"$Alibaba(09988)$Last minutes have 50m buying before market close, next Monday open high!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/179623927","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":317,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":147181420,"gmtCreate":1626341611160,"gmtModify":1703758249617,"author":{"id":"3557531278630339","authorId":"3557531278630339","authorIdStr":"3557531278630339","name":"Hannee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2a23162818c1e2b051d79f5521b6ee57","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3557531278630339"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/02318\">$PING AN(02318)$</a>Today all cash flow into 2318. Should be next wave soon!&nbsp;","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/02318\">$PING AN(02318)$</a>Today all cash flow into 2318. Should be next wave soon!&nbsp;","text":"$PING AN(02318)$Today all cash flow into 2318. Should be next wave soon!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/147181420","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":122,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":148739861,"gmtCreate":1626014916953,"gmtModify":1703751955195,"author":{"id":"3557531278630339","authorId":"3557531278630339","authorIdStr":"3557531278630339","name":"Hannee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2a23162818c1e2b051d79f5521b6ee57","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3557531278630339"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"They must have R&amp;d for battery. Or find byd","listText":"They must have R&amp;d for battery. Or find byd","text":"They must have R&d for battery. Or find byd","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/148739861","repostId":"1166379040","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1166379040","pubTimestamp":1625968800,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1166379040?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-11 10:00","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple AirPod batteries are almost impossible to replace, showing the need for right-to-repair reform","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1166379040","media":"CNBC","summary":"KEY POINTS\n\nOwners have noticed that Apple AirPods eventually will last only an hour or so before ne","content":"<div>\n<p>KEY POINTS\n\nOwners have noticed that Apple AirPods eventually will last only an hour or so before needing to be recharged, compared to their four-to-five-hour battery life out of the box.\nBut it’s ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/07/10/apple-airpod-battery-life-problem-shows-need-for-right-to-repair-laws.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"cnbc_highlight","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple AirPod batteries are almost impossible to replace, showing the need for right-to-repair reform</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple AirPod batteries are almost impossible to replace, showing the need for right-to-repair reform\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-11 10:00 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.cnbc.com/2021/07/10/apple-airpod-battery-life-problem-shows-need-for-right-to-repair-laws.html><strong>CNBC</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>KEY POINTS\n\nOwners have noticed that Apple AirPods eventually will last only an hour or so before needing to be recharged, compared to their four-to-five-hour battery life out of the box.\nBut it’s ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/07/10/apple-airpod-battery-life-problem-shows-need-for-right-to-repair-laws.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/07/10/apple-airpod-battery-life-problem-shows-need-for-right-to-repair-laws.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/72bb72e1b84c09fca865c6dcb1bbcd16","article_id":"1166379040","content_text":"KEY POINTS\n\nOwners have noticed that Apple AirPods eventually will last only an hour or so before needing to be recharged, compared to their four-to-five-hour battery life out of the box.\nBut it’s almost impossible to replace the battery at home because AirPods are tiny, packed with components, and hard to take apart.\nA new startup called PodSwap is aiming to make it easier to repair AirPods and keep them out of landfills or recycling plants, but its challenges show the need for right-to-repair laws.\n\nWhen AirPods were first released in 2016, they were a marvel of miniaturization.\nTo ditch cords and go wireless,Apple packed several chips, microphones and speakers into each headphone, which weigh about 4 grams. Without a cord, the earbud gets its power from a tiny cylindrical battery that has about 1% of the capacity of an iPhone’s battery.\nBut lithium-ion batteries, like those used by the AirPods, wear out the more they are used.\nSome owners have noticed that, after a few years, used AirPods eventually will last only an hour or so before needing to be recharged -- a big decay from the four-to-five-hour battery life they have when new. Because each AirPod is so small and so tightly packed into its housing, it’s almost impossible to swap out the old battery for a new one. Most people give up and just buy a new pair.\nThe limited lifespan of AirPods is exactly the kind of problem that the “right-to-repair” movement wants to fix. Repair shops and lobbyists that support repair reform want lawmakers to implement a variety of rules, including increased access to manuals and official parts and consumer protections around warranties.\nBut one of their most important requests is for companies to design products with repair in mind, instead of packing gadgets with unlabeled parts and sticking them together with glue, forcing users to use a knife to take them apart.\nThis desire puts repair advocates at odds with hardware companies like Apple, whose business models depend on customers upgrading to the latest model every few years. When Apple offered cheap iPhone battery repairs a few years ago, it hurt sales as consumers were able to hang on to their old phones for longer instead of upgrading. Apple also charges customers for repairs and extended warranties.\n“We design our products for durability in order to minimize the need for repair,” Apple wrote in an environmental report earlier this year. “But in the instance a repair is needed, we believe our customers should have convenient access to safe and reliable repair services, to get their product back up and running as quickly as possible.”\nThe right-to-repair movement gains steam\nPolicymakers have started to engage more closely with right-to-repair advocates in recent years. State-level bills have been introduced in a majority of states, but electronics companies have lobbied against them and none have passed.\nIn May, the Federal Trade Commission released a 56-page report on repair restrictions, concluding that repair restrictions have “steered consumers into manufacturers’ repair networks or to replace products before the end of their useful lives” — exactly the problem users are running into with their AirPods.\nThe Biden administration on Friday ordered the FTC to write new regulations targeted at limiting manufacturers’ ability to hamper independent or do-it-yourself repairs as part of a sweeping executive order. New repair rules have not yet been drafted.\n“Tech and other companies impose restrictions on self and third-party repairs, making repairs more costly and time-consuming, such as by restricting the distribution of parts, diagnostics, and repair tools,” the White House wrote in a fact sheet about the order on Friday, linking to a story about fixing Apple products. Apple declined to comment on the White House executive order.\nThe FTC has not said what it plans to do, but repair advocates want a few key policy changes, as detailed in its May report. They want companies to be required to make official replacement parts available. They want access to tools that could make repairs easier without reverse-engineering the tools or parts themselves. And ultimately, they want products to be designed with longer lifespans.\nApple is not the only company that would be affected by these policies. Much of the recent pressure is on medical device companies and tractor manufacturers. But given Apple’s ubiquity, it has become a poster child for repair, especially because it promotes its environmental efforts as a corporate value.\nApple has launched a program it calls the “Independent Repair Program” which gives repair shops the option to enter into a certification process and contract with Apple in order to get access to authentic Apple parts, tools and manuals.\nApple has also reduced the price of its battery replacement for iPhones, and recent models have been designed to make it easier to replace a battery or cracked screen, according to iFixit. Plus, compared to other consumer electronics companies, Apple has a large existing network of stores and authorized repair shops.\nStill, many Apple products remain challenging to repair at home or as a business with no contact with Apple.\nThe only AirPods battery replacement company\niFixit, a company that provides disassembly instructions and sells replacement parts for gadgets, gives AirPods models a score of zero out of 10 for repairability. According to iFixit, repairing these earbuds involves soldering, hot air guns and slicing through glue — that is, if replacement battery parts are even available. In the end, a would-be home repairer would have to put the four-gram computer back together again.\nApple provides “battery service” for AirPods, at the cost of $49 per earbud. But functionally, Apple simply gives you a replacement pair, and the old earbuds are recycled. It’s not a repair, it’s a replacement. And it’s expensive. AirPods originally cost $159, so opting for battery service costs more than half of the price of a new pair.\nApple sold about 72.8 million AirPods units in 2020, according to a CounterPoint research estimate, so tens of millions of consumers will face the same lack of choice in the coming years.\nPodSwap is a Miami company founded by Emma Stritzinger and Emily Alpert which aims to keep AirPods “out of the landfill.” They’re not associated with Apple.\nThey believe they’re the only company performing AirPod battery replacements, although other companies “refurbish” old AirPods, the founders told CNBC. The company was formed after the founders experienced dying AirPods themselves and thought that upgrading or replacing them would be wasteful and impractical.\nI recently replaced a pair of AirPods that were only holding a charge for 45 minutes -- too short to complete a phone call. I paid $59 on PodSwap’s Shopify site and a few days later received a replacement pair of AirPods with new batteries. They weren’t my old AirPods, they were another set that had their batteries replaced.\nAlong with those new pods, PodSwap includes a box and a return label. It wants your old AirPods back. It then cleans and sanitizes the old pair, puts in new batteries and sends them out to the next person who wants to change the battery in their old AirPods.\nBut PodSwap faces many challenges that show why repair advocates want new rules. Alpert said the design of the AirPod makes it challenging for repair shops or companies like theirs to do a lot of battery replacements. PodSwap’s process uses both robotics and manual labor, the founders said.\n“The process was developed through trial and error and a large number of units were ‘sacrificed’ and ultimately recycled. One major challenge we faced was overcoming the uniqueness of this product. Each AirPod is assembled with slight differences, which creates complexity in the disassembly,” Alpert said.\nPodSwap plans to soon offer service for the AirPods Pro, a newer model that costs $249 and are, surprisingly, powered by a standard-sized coin battery.\nBut the AirPods Pro have many of the same problems as the first model — tight tolerances, potential damage while taking them apart, a lack of replacement parts, and a design that suggests the product was always designed to last a limited time.\n“We have found the AirPods Pro’s batteries to be more difficult to replace,” Alpert said. “The ergonomic design and tight unforgiving tolerances make it exceptionally challenging to replace the batteries repeatedly, with a high degree of efficiency.”\nPodSwap wasn’t totally seamless for me — I got sent a combination of “first generation” and “second generation” AirPods. They caused my iPhone to send error messages, but I sent an email to PodSwap and a day or two later I got a second replacement set, which worked.\nAfter that, I sent my first replacement set and my old AirPods back. The AirPods I received look and work like new.\nI plan on trying to get another four years out of them.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":5,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":155973743,"gmtCreate":1625371903482,"gmtModify":1703740954001,"author":{"id":"3557531278630339","authorId":"3557531278630339","authorIdStr":"3557531278630339","name":"Hannee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2a23162818c1e2b051d79f5521b6ee57","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3557531278630339"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"??","listText":"??","text":"??","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/155973743","repostId":"2148807114","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2148807114","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1625367960,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2148807114?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-04 11:06","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Can Biden really protect Americans from the next crippling cyber attack?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2148807114","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"International rivals have little incentive to stop attacks against the U.S.\nAn epidemic of cyberatta","content":"<p>International rivals have little incentive to stop attacks against the U.S.</p>\n<p>An epidemic of cyberattacks against the American government, citizens and businesses has raged for years, but experts say the U.S. government has been slow to respond, while remaining skeptical that proposed solutions would be effective in stopping international cyberthreats.</p>\n<p>The only major cybersecurity law passed during the past decade was the Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act of 2015, which created rules encouraging the private sector to share information about cyberattacks with the government, but did not make disclosure mandatory.</p>\n<p>Jim Lewis, director of the strategic technologies program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies told MarketWatch that congressional gridlock kept the Obama administration from passing a bipartisan law that would enable the federal government to require private companies to report cyberattacks.</p>\n<p>Read more: Colonial Pipeline CEO warns Congress that 'criminal gangs' are always 'sharpening their tactics' to target U.S. companies, government</p>\n<p>\"The idea of regulation used to be that you couldn't bring it up,\" he said. \"The Chamber of Commerce and and everyone else lined up to explain why it was bad. At the end of the day, Mitch McConnell decided that he didn't want to regulate,\" referring to the then Republican Senate majority leader from Kentucky. During the Trump administration, \"we pretty much sat out the last four years, it's painful to say that, but that's how it is,\" he added.</p>\n<p>President Joe Biden's administration, however, is attempting to make up for lost time with an executive order signed in May that would beef up U.S. government cyber security defenses and leverage the power of the federal procurement process to raise the security of software products.</p>\n<p>\"There's has really been a missed opportunity to use federal procurement to drive a secure market,\" Anne Neuberger, deputy national security adviser for cyber and emerging technology at the White House said during a virtual conference at CSIS last month.</p>\n<p>She added that the government is developing software standards that private providers must meet in order to sell to the government under the theory that higher quality software would become the industry standard, given the vast amount of software the government purchases annually. Neuberger argued that it wouldn't be cost effective for software providers to offer two products: a superior <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE\">one</a> to the government and a substandard <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> to the private sector.</p>\n<p>\"When you're building software in a world where you have sophisticated nation-state attackers constantly hunting for vulnerabilities in that software, build it in more secure ways,\" Neuberger said.</p>\n<p>Following last year's Solar Winds attack , which went unnoticed for months and threatened 18,000 companies and government agencies, and the Colonial Pipeline hack that led to widespread gasoline shortages in the U.S. Northeast, there finally seems to be an appetite for bipartisan legislation that would enable better oversight of critical infrastructure, according to Mark Gamis a senior vice president at Booz Allen Hamilton who advises federal clients on cyber operations.</p>\n<p>He pointed to reports of a proposal drafted by Democratic Sen. Mark Warner of Virginia and Republican senators Marco Rubio of Florida and Susan Collins of Maine that would require federal contractors and owners of critical infrastructure to report cyber incidents to federal authorities within 24 hours.</p>\n<p>\"That's important because the federal government has tremendous resources to bring to bear to help our with an incident, and in any sort of emergent situation, time is of the essence,\" he said, adding that the bipartisan nature of the bill indicates the GOP is now ready to get on board with mandatory reporting.</p>\n<p>Cybersecurity advocates have long argued that greater collaboration between government and business is essential to mitigate the effects of cybercrime.</p>\n<p>\"Governments and companies have different sources of information, insight and intelligence, wrote Paul Me, a lead partner for Cyber Risk at the consultancy Oliver Wyman in an op-ed for the World Economic Forum . \"Pooling them in a timely manner will create a clearer and more current picture of cyberthreats.\"</p>\n<p>CSIS' Jim Lewis, warned, however, that at its core the problem must be viewed through the lense of geopolitics, because the most sophisticated cyberattacks largely come from state actors or criminal groups in adversarial nations, including China, Iran and Russia. U.S. intelligence officials have said both the Solar Winds and Colonial Pipeline attack were done by Russian proxies.</p>\n<p>See also: Biden says he told Putin infrastructure should be 'off limits' to cyberattacks</p>\n<p>\"The Russians have a thriving cybercrime market and make billions of dollars a year,\" Lewis said. \"So why would they give that up, especially because the Kremlin enjoys the U.S. getting hit over the head?\"</p>\n<p>Lewis said that the Biden-Putin summit earlier this month was a success insofar as Biden set boundaries on acceptable behavior, with the president demanding that 16 critical infrastructure sectors , including energy and water, should be off-limits to cyberattacks. The question of how the U.S. would retaliate following a hack on one of these sectors, however, remains unanswered.</p>\n<p>\"The Russians have basically said that 'you have so many sanctions on us, one more won't make a difference,\" Lewis said, adding that the U.S. must get creative about an cyber-offensive approach to punish adversaries for their behavior, including shutting down cloud computing services that power the Russian internet.</p>\n<p>\"These are hard issues because the two things that the government needs to do is regulate U.S. companies while engaging with both allies and opponents on the international stage,\" Lewis added. \"Maybe that's too much for the government, but if it's too much in the government, we just need to get used to being whacked.\"</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Can Biden really protect Americans from the next crippling cyber attack?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nCan Biden really protect Americans from the next crippling cyber attack?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-07-04 11:06</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>International rivals have little incentive to stop attacks against the U.S.</p>\n<p>An epidemic of cyberattacks against the American government, citizens and businesses has raged for years, but experts say the U.S. government has been slow to respond, while remaining skeptical that proposed solutions would be effective in stopping international cyberthreats.</p>\n<p>The only major cybersecurity law passed during the past decade was the Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act of 2015, which created rules encouraging the private sector to share information about cyberattacks with the government, but did not make disclosure mandatory.</p>\n<p>Jim Lewis, director of the strategic technologies program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies told MarketWatch that congressional gridlock kept the Obama administration from passing a bipartisan law that would enable the federal government to require private companies to report cyberattacks.</p>\n<p>Read more: Colonial Pipeline CEO warns Congress that 'criminal gangs' are always 'sharpening their tactics' to target U.S. companies, government</p>\n<p>\"The idea of regulation used to be that you couldn't bring it up,\" he said. \"The Chamber of Commerce and and everyone else lined up to explain why it was bad. At the end of the day, Mitch McConnell decided that he didn't want to regulate,\" referring to the then Republican Senate majority leader from Kentucky. During the Trump administration, \"we pretty much sat out the last four years, it's painful to say that, but that's how it is,\" he added.</p>\n<p>President Joe Biden's administration, however, is attempting to make up for lost time with an executive order signed in May that would beef up U.S. government cyber security defenses and leverage the power of the federal procurement process to raise the security of software products.</p>\n<p>\"There's has really been a missed opportunity to use federal procurement to drive a secure market,\" Anne Neuberger, deputy national security adviser for cyber and emerging technology at the White House said during a virtual conference at CSIS last month.</p>\n<p>She added that the government is developing software standards that private providers must meet in order to sell to the government under the theory that higher quality software would become the industry standard, given the vast amount of software the government purchases annually. Neuberger argued that it wouldn't be cost effective for software providers to offer two products: a superior <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE\">one</a> to the government and a substandard <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> to the private sector.</p>\n<p>\"When you're building software in a world where you have sophisticated nation-state attackers constantly hunting for vulnerabilities in that software, build it in more secure ways,\" Neuberger said.</p>\n<p>Following last year's Solar Winds attack , which went unnoticed for months and threatened 18,000 companies and government agencies, and the Colonial Pipeline hack that led to widespread gasoline shortages in the U.S. Northeast, there finally seems to be an appetite for bipartisan legislation that would enable better oversight of critical infrastructure, according to Mark Gamis a senior vice president at Booz Allen Hamilton who advises federal clients on cyber operations.</p>\n<p>He pointed to reports of a proposal drafted by Democratic Sen. Mark Warner of Virginia and Republican senators Marco Rubio of Florida and Susan Collins of Maine that would require federal contractors and owners of critical infrastructure to report cyber incidents to federal authorities within 24 hours.</p>\n<p>\"That's important because the federal government has tremendous resources to bring to bear to help our with an incident, and in any sort of emergent situation, time is of the essence,\" he said, adding that the bipartisan nature of the bill indicates the GOP is now ready to get on board with mandatory reporting.</p>\n<p>Cybersecurity advocates have long argued that greater collaboration between government and business is essential to mitigate the effects of cybercrime.</p>\n<p>\"Governments and companies have different sources of information, insight and intelligence, wrote Paul Me, a lead partner for Cyber Risk at the consultancy Oliver Wyman in an op-ed for the World Economic Forum . \"Pooling them in a timely manner will create a clearer and more current picture of cyberthreats.\"</p>\n<p>CSIS' Jim Lewis, warned, however, that at its core the problem must be viewed through the lense of geopolitics, because the most sophisticated cyberattacks largely come from state actors or criminal groups in adversarial nations, including China, Iran and Russia. U.S. intelligence officials have said both the Solar Winds and Colonial Pipeline attack were done by Russian proxies.</p>\n<p>See also: Biden says he told Putin infrastructure should be 'off limits' to cyberattacks</p>\n<p>\"The Russians have a thriving cybercrime market and make billions of dollars a year,\" Lewis said. \"So why would they give that up, especially because the Kremlin enjoys the U.S. getting hit over the head?\"</p>\n<p>Lewis said that the Biden-Putin summit earlier this month was a success insofar as Biden set boundaries on acceptable behavior, with the president demanding that 16 critical infrastructure sectors , including energy and water, should be off-limits to cyberattacks. The question of how the U.S. would retaliate following a hack on one of these sectors, however, remains unanswered.</p>\n<p>\"The Russians have basically said that 'you have so many sanctions on us, one more won't make a difference,\" Lewis said, adding that the U.S. must get creative about an cyber-offensive approach to punish adversaries for their behavior, including shutting down cloud computing services that power the Russian internet.</p>\n<p>\"These are hard issues because the two things that the government needs to do is regulate U.S. companies while engaging with both allies and opponents on the international stage,\" Lewis added. \"Maybe that's too much for the government, but if it's too much in the government, we just need to get used to being whacked.\"</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2148807114","content_text":"International rivals have little incentive to stop attacks against the U.S.\nAn epidemic of cyberattacks against the American government, citizens and businesses has raged for years, but experts say the U.S. government has been slow to respond, while remaining skeptical that proposed solutions would be effective in stopping international cyberthreats.\nThe only major cybersecurity law passed during the past decade was the Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act of 2015, which created rules encouraging the private sector to share information about cyberattacks with the government, but did not make disclosure mandatory.\nJim Lewis, director of the strategic technologies program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies told MarketWatch that congressional gridlock kept the Obama administration from passing a bipartisan law that would enable the federal government to require private companies to report cyberattacks.\nRead more: Colonial Pipeline CEO warns Congress that 'criminal gangs' are always 'sharpening their tactics' to target U.S. companies, government\n\"The idea of regulation used to be that you couldn't bring it up,\" he said. \"The Chamber of Commerce and and everyone else lined up to explain why it was bad. At the end of the day, Mitch McConnell decided that he didn't want to regulate,\" referring to the then Republican Senate majority leader from Kentucky. During the Trump administration, \"we pretty much sat out the last four years, it's painful to say that, but that's how it is,\" he added.\nPresident Joe Biden's administration, however, is attempting to make up for lost time with an executive order signed in May that would beef up U.S. government cyber security defenses and leverage the power of the federal procurement process to raise the security of software products.\n\"There's has really been a missed opportunity to use federal procurement to drive a secure market,\" Anne Neuberger, deputy national security adviser for cyber and emerging technology at the White House said during a virtual conference at CSIS last month.\nShe added that the government is developing software standards that private providers must meet in order to sell to the government under the theory that higher quality software would become the industry standard, given the vast amount of software the government purchases annually. Neuberger argued that it wouldn't be cost effective for software providers to offer two products: a superior one to the government and a substandard one to the private sector.\n\"When you're building software in a world where you have sophisticated nation-state attackers constantly hunting for vulnerabilities in that software, build it in more secure ways,\" Neuberger said.\nFollowing last year's Solar Winds attack , which went unnoticed for months and threatened 18,000 companies and government agencies, and the Colonial Pipeline hack that led to widespread gasoline shortages in the U.S. Northeast, there finally seems to be an appetite for bipartisan legislation that would enable better oversight of critical infrastructure, according to Mark Gamis a senior vice president at Booz Allen Hamilton who advises federal clients on cyber operations.\nHe pointed to reports of a proposal drafted by Democratic Sen. Mark Warner of Virginia and Republican senators Marco Rubio of Florida and Susan Collins of Maine that would require federal contractors and owners of critical infrastructure to report cyber incidents to federal authorities within 24 hours.\n\"That's important because the federal government has tremendous resources to bring to bear to help our with an incident, and in any sort of emergent situation, time is of the essence,\" he said, adding that the bipartisan nature of the bill indicates the GOP is now ready to get on board with mandatory reporting.\nCybersecurity advocates have long argued that greater collaboration between government and business is essential to mitigate the effects of cybercrime.\n\"Governments and companies have different sources of information, insight and intelligence, wrote Paul Me, a lead partner for Cyber Risk at the consultancy Oliver Wyman in an op-ed for the World Economic Forum . \"Pooling them in a timely manner will create a clearer and more current picture of cyberthreats.\"\nCSIS' Jim Lewis, warned, however, that at its core the problem must be viewed through the lense of geopolitics, because the most sophisticated cyberattacks largely come from state actors or criminal groups in adversarial nations, including China, Iran and Russia. U.S. intelligence officials have said both the Solar Winds and Colonial Pipeline attack were done by Russian proxies.\nSee also: Biden says he told Putin infrastructure should be 'off limits' to cyberattacks\n\"The Russians have a thriving cybercrime market and make billions of dollars a year,\" Lewis said. \"So why would they give that up, especially because the Kremlin enjoys the U.S. getting hit over the head?\"\nLewis said that the Biden-Putin summit earlier this month was a success insofar as Biden set boundaries on acceptable behavior, with the president demanding that 16 critical infrastructure sectors , including energy and water, should be off-limits to cyberattacks. The question of how the U.S. would retaliate following a hack on one of these sectors, however, remains unanswered.\n\"The Russians have basically said that 'you have so many sanctions on us, one more won't make a difference,\" Lewis said, adding that the U.S. must get creative about an cyber-offensive approach to punish adversaries for their behavior, including shutting down cloud computing services that power the Russian internet.\n\"These are hard issues because the two things that the government needs to do is regulate U.S. companies while engaging with both allies and opponents on the international stage,\" Lewis added. \"Maybe that's too much for the government, but if it's too much in the government, we just need to get used to being whacked.\"","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":156,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":152260037,"gmtCreate":1625297513329,"gmtModify":1703740188623,"author":{"id":"3557531278630339","authorId":"3557531278630339","authorIdStr":"3557531278630339","name":"Hannee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2a23162818c1e2b051d79f5521b6ee57","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3557531278630339"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[Happy]&nbsp;","listText":"[Happy]&nbsp;","text":"[Happy]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":8,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/152260037","repostId":"1136694264","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1136694264","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Stock Market Quotes, Business News, Financial News, Trading Ideas, and Stock Research by Professionals","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Benzinga","id":"1052270027","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa"},"pubTimestamp":1625293431,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1136694264?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-03 14:23","market":"us","language":"en","title":"AMC Options Traders Aren't Discouraged, Repeatedly Hammer Calls","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1136694264","media":"Benzinga","summary":"On Friday morning, Iceberg Researchannouncedit had taken a short position inAMC Entertainment Holdin","content":"<p>On Friday morning, Iceberg Researchannouncedit had taken a short position in<b>AMC Entertainment Holdings</b>AMC 4.08%. Iceberg said options traders have lost money due to the stock trading sideways for the month of June and that the pump around the stock looks shaky.</p>\n<p>The news didn’t stop institutions from continuously hammering AMC call contracts and on Friday options traders had purchased over $2.59 million worth. The expiration dates for the contracts ranged from today up until Dec. 17 and a few traders chose a strike price of a whopping $145.</p>\n<p>AMC’s stock broke bearishly from a symmetrical triangle it had formed through its sideways trading on Friday, but held a support level at $47.91 and bounced from it. Bulls would like to see the dip continue to be bought and for AMC to end the day by printing a hammer candlestick and closing above the 21-day exponential moving average.</p>\n<p><b>Why It’s Important:</b>When a sweep order occurs, it indicates the trader wanted to get into a position quickly and is anticipating an imminent large move in stock price. A sweeper pays market price for the call or put option instead of placing a bid, which sweeps the order book of multiple exchanges to fill the order immediately.</p>\n<p>These types of call option orders are usually made by institutions, and retail investors can find watching for sweepers useful because it indicates “smart money” has entered into a position.</p>\n<p><b>The AMC Option Trades:</b>Below is a look at the notable options alerts, courtesy ofBenzinga Pro:</p>\n<ul>\n <li>At 9:42 a.m., Friday a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 265 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $59 expiring on July 9. The trade represented a $52,205 bullish bet for which the trader paid $1.97 per option contract.</li>\n <li>At 9:51 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 247 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $65 expiring on Aug. 20. The trade represented a $221,065 bullish bet for which the trader paid $8.95 per option contract.</li>\n <li>At 9:52 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 248 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $120 expiring on Dec. 17. The trade represented a $260,400 bullish bet for which the trader paid $10.50 per option contract.</li>\n <li>At 9:53 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 356 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $65 expiring on Aug. 20. The trade represented a $311,500 bullish bet for which the trader paid $8.75 per option contract.</li>\n <li>At 9:53 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 310 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $65 expiring on Aug. 20. The trade represented a $266,600 bullish bet for which the trader paid $8.60 per option contract.</li>\n <li>At 9:56 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 310 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $65 expiring on Aug. 20. The trade represented a $266,600 bullish bet for which the trader paid $8.60 per option contract.</li>\n <li>At 9:57 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 300 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $28 expiring on July 2. The trade represented a $221,065 bullish bet for which the trader paid $23.40 per option contract.</li>\n <li>At 9:58 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 289 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $120 expiring on Dec., 17. The trade represented a $303,450 bullish bet for which the trader paid $10.50 per option contract.</li>\n <li>At 9:58 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 580 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $55 expiring on July 16. The trade represented a $278,400 bullish bet for which the trader paid $4.80 per option contract.</li>\n <li>At 10:07 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 258 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $80 expiring on July 16. The trade represented a $39,216 bullish bet for which the trader paid $1.52 per option contract.</li>\n <li>At 10:24 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 352 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $50 expiring on July 2. The trade represented a $54,560 bullish bet for which the trader paid $1.55 per option contract.</li>\n <li>At 10:26 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 234 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $145 expiring on July 23. The trade represented a $39,216 bullish bet for which the trader paid $1.31 per option contract.</li>\n <li>At 10:31 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 224 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $145 expiring on Sept. 17. The trade represented a $105,280 bullish bet for which the trader paid $4.70 per option contract.</li>\n <li>At 10:38 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 500 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $47 expiring on July 2. The trade represented a $146,000 bullish bet for which the trader paid $2.92 per option contract.</li>\n <li>At 12:02 p.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 500 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $45 expiring on July 9. The trade represented a $305,000 bullish bet for which the trader paid $6.10 per option contract.</li>\n</ul>\n<p><b>AMC Price Action:</b>Shares of AMC Entertainment were trading down 5.3% to $51.33 at publication time.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>AMC Options Traders Aren't Discouraged, Repeatedly Hammer Calls</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAMC Options Traders Aren't Discouraged, Repeatedly Hammer Calls\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Benzinga </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-07-03 14:23</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>On Friday morning, Iceberg Researchannouncedit had taken a short position in<b>AMC Entertainment Holdings</b>AMC 4.08%. Iceberg said options traders have lost money due to the stock trading sideways for the month of June and that the pump around the stock looks shaky.</p>\n<p>The news didn’t stop institutions from continuously hammering AMC call contracts and on Friday options traders had purchased over $2.59 million worth. The expiration dates for the contracts ranged from today up until Dec. 17 and a few traders chose a strike price of a whopping $145.</p>\n<p>AMC’s stock broke bearishly from a symmetrical triangle it had formed through its sideways trading on Friday, but held a support level at $47.91 and bounced from it. Bulls would like to see the dip continue to be bought and for AMC to end the day by printing a hammer candlestick and closing above the 21-day exponential moving average.</p>\n<p><b>Why It’s Important:</b>When a sweep order occurs, it indicates the trader wanted to get into a position quickly and is anticipating an imminent large move in stock price. A sweeper pays market price for the call or put option instead of placing a bid, which sweeps the order book of multiple exchanges to fill the order immediately.</p>\n<p>These types of call option orders are usually made by institutions, and retail investors can find watching for sweepers useful because it indicates “smart money” has entered into a position.</p>\n<p><b>The AMC Option Trades:</b>Below is a look at the notable options alerts, courtesy ofBenzinga Pro:</p>\n<ul>\n <li>At 9:42 a.m., Friday a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 265 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $59 expiring on July 9. The trade represented a $52,205 bullish bet for which the trader paid $1.97 per option contract.</li>\n <li>At 9:51 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 247 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $65 expiring on Aug. 20. The trade represented a $221,065 bullish bet for which the trader paid $8.95 per option contract.</li>\n <li>At 9:52 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 248 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $120 expiring on Dec. 17. The trade represented a $260,400 bullish bet for which the trader paid $10.50 per option contract.</li>\n <li>At 9:53 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 356 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $65 expiring on Aug. 20. The trade represented a $311,500 bullish bet for which the trader paid $8.75 per option contract.</li>\n <li>At 9:53 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 310 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $65 expiring on Aug. 20. The trade represented a $266,600 bullish bet for which the trader paid $8.60 per option contract.</li>\n <li>At 9:56 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 310 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $65 expiring on Aug. 20. The trade represented a $266,600 bullish bet for which the trader paid $8.60 per option contract.</li>\n <li>At 9:57 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 300 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $28 expiring on July 2. The trade represented a $221,065 bullish bet for which the trader paid $23.40 per option contract.</li>\n <li>At 9:58 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 289 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $120 expiring on Dec., 17. The trade represented a $303,450 bullish bet for which the trader paid $10.50 per option contract.</li>\n <li>At 9:58 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 580 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $55 expiring on July 16. The trade represented a $278,400 bullish bet for which the trader paid $4.80 per option contract.</li>\n <li>At 10:07 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 258 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $80 expiring on July 16. The trade represented a $39,216 bullish bet for which the trader paid $1.52 per option contract.</li>\n <li>At 10:24 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 352 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $50 expiring on July 2. The trade represented a $54,560 bullish bet for which the trader paid $1.55 per option contract.</li>\n <li>At 10:26 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 234 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $145 expiring on July 23. The trade represented a $39,216 bullish bet for which the trader paid $1.31 per option contract.</li>\n <li>At 10:31 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 224 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $145 expiring on Sept. 17. The trade represented a $105,280 bullish bet for which the trader paid $4.70 per option contract.</li>\n <li>At 10:38 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 500 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $47 expiring on July 2. The trade represented a $146,000 bullish bet for which the trader paid $2.92 per option contract.</li>\n <li>At 12:02 p.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 500 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $45 expiring on July 9. The trade represented a $305,000 bullish bet for which the trader paid $6.10 per option contract.</li>\n</ul>\n<p><b>AMC Price Action:</b>Shares of AMC Entertainment were trading down 5.3% to $51.33 at publication time.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AMC":"AMC院线"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1136694264","content_text":"On Friday morning, Iceberg Researchannouncedit had taken a short position inAMC Entertainment HoldingsAMC 4.08%. Iceberg said options traders have lost money due to the stock trading sideways for the month of June and that the pump around the stock looks shaky.\nThe news didn’t stop institutions from continuously hammering AMC call contracts and on Friday options traders had purchased over $2.59 million worth. The expiration dates for the contracts ranged from today up until Dec. 17 and a few traders chose a strike price of a whopping $145.\nAMC’s stock broke bearishly from a symmetrical triangle it had formed through its sideways trading on Friday, but held a support level at $47.91 and bounced from it. Bulls would like to see the dip continue to be bought and for AMC to end the day by printing a hammer candlestick and closing above the 21-day exponential moving average.\nWhy It’s Important:When a sweep order occurs, it indicates the trader wanted to get into a position quickly and is anticipating an imminent large move in stock price. A sweeper pays market price for the call or put option instead of placing a bid, which sweeps the order book of multiple exchanges to fill the order immediately.\nThese types of call option orders are usually made by institutions, and retail investors can find watching for sweepers useful because it indicates “smart money” has entered into a position.\nThe AMC Option Trades:Below is a look at the notable options alerts, courtesy ofBenzinga Pro:\n\nAt 9:42 a.m., Friday a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 265 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $59 expiring on July 9. The trade represented a $52,205 bullish bet for which the trader paid $1.97 per option contract.\nAt 9:51 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 247 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $65 expiring on Aug. 20. The trade represented a $221,065 bullish bet for which the trader paid $8.95 per option contract.\nAt 9:52 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 248 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $120 expiring on Dec. 17. The trade represented a $260,400 bullish bet for which the trader paid $10.50 per option contract.\nAt 9:53 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 356 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $65 expiring on Aug. 20. The trade represented a $311,500 bullish bet for which the trader paid $8.75 per option contract.\nAt 9:53 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 310 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $65 expiring on Aug. 20. The trade represented a $266,600 bullish bet for which the trader paid $8.60 per option contract.\nAt 9:56 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 310 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $65 expiring on Aug. 20. The trade represented a $266,600 bullish bet for which the trader paid $8.60 per option contract.\nAt 9:57 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 300 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $28 expiring on July 2. The trade represented a $221,065 bullish bet for which the trader paid $23.40 per option contract.\nAt 9:58 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 289 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $120 expiring on Dec., 17. The trade represented a $303,450 bullish bet for which the trader paid $10.50 per option contract.\nAt 9:58 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 580 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $55 expiring on July 16. The trade represented a $278,400 bullish bet for which the trader paid $4.80 per option contract.\nAt 10:07 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 258 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $80 expiring on July 16. The trade represented a $39,216 bullish bet for which the trader paid $1.52 per option contract.\nAt 10:24 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 352 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $50 expiring on July 2. The trade represented a $54,560 bullish bet for which the trader paid $1.55 per option contract.\nAt 10:26 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 234 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $145 expiring on July 23. The trade represented a $39,216 bullish bet for which the trader paid $1.31 per option contract.\nAt 10:31 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 224 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $145 expiring on Sept. 17. The trade represented a $105,280 bullish bet for which the trader paid $4.70 per option contract.\nAt 10:38 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 500 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $47 expiring on July 2. The trade represented a $146,000 bullish bet for which the trader paid $2.92 per option contract.\nAt 12:02 p.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 500 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $45 expiring on July 9. The trade represented a $305,000 bullish bet for which the trader paid $6.10 per option contract.\n\nAMC Price Action:Shares of AMC Entertainment were trading down 5.3% to $51.33 at publication time.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":23,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":150630630,"gmtCreate":1624895286520,"gmtModify":1703847457624,"author":{"id":"3557531278630339","authorId":"3557531278630339","authorIdStr":"3557531278630339","name":"Hannee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2a23162818c1e2b051d79f5521b6ee57","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3557531278630339"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Mean the next step is increase the interest soon!&nbsp;","listText":"Mean the next step is increase the interest soon!&nbsp;","text":"Mean the next step is increase the interest soon!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/150630630","repostId":"1129950691","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1129950691","pubTimestamp":1624891529,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1129950691?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-28 22:45","market":"us","language":"en","title":"The Fed’s inflation view could drag the economy into recession, El-Erian warns","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1129950691","media":"CNBC","summary":"KEY POINTS\n\nFed officials are underestimating inflation and risking another recession, Mohamed El-Er","content":"<div>\n<p>KEY POINTS\n\nFed officials are underestimating inflation and risking another recession, Mohamed El-Erian told CNBC on Monday.\n“Every day I see evidence of inflation not being transitory, and I have ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/06/28/el-erian-says-the-fed-is-behind-on-inflation-and-risks-another-recession-if-it-is-forced-to-catch-up.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"cnbc_highlight","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>The Fed’s inflation view could drag the economy into recession, El-Erian warns</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nThe Fed’s inflation view could drag the economy into recession, El-Erian warns\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-06-28 22:45 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.cnbc.com/2021/06/28/el-erian-says-the-fed-is-behind-on-inflation-and-risks-another-recession-if-it-is-forced-to-catch-up.html><strong>CNBC</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>KEY POINTS\n\nFed officials are underestimating inflation and risking another recession, Mohamed El-Erian told CNBC on Monday.\n“Every day I see evidence of inflation not being transitory, and I have ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/06/28/el-erian-says-the-fed-is-behind-on-inflation-and-risks-another-recession-if-it-is-forced-to-catch-up.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index"},"source_url":"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/06/28/el-erian-says-the-fed-is-behind-on-inflation-and-risks-another-recession-if-it-is-forced-to-catch-up.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/72bb72e1b84c09fca865c6dcb1bbcd16","article_id":"1129950691","content_text":"KEY POINTS\n\nFed officials are underestimating inflation and risking another recession, Mohamed El-Erian told CNBC on Monday.\n“Every day I see evidence of inflation not being transitory, and I have concern that the Fed is falling behind,” he said.\nCentral bank leaders insist that the recent round of inflation will subside once short-term supply chain bottlenecks clear and 2020 data fades from comparisons.\n\nFederal Reserve officials are underestimating inflation and risking that the U.S. could fall into another recession, Mohamed El-Erian, the Allianz chief economic advisor, told CNBC on Monday.\nCentral bank leaders insist that the recent round of price pressures will subside once short-term supply chain bottlenecks clear and the 2020 economic shutdown period is no longer part of the year-over-year comparisons.\nBut El-Erian said he sees growing evidence that the Fed is wrong.\n“I have concerns about the inflation story,” he told CNBC’s Becky Quick during a “Squawk Box” interview. “Every day I see evidence of inflation not being transitory, and I have concern that the Fed is falling behind and that it may have to play catch-up, and history makes you very uncomfortable if you end up in a world in which the Fed has to play catch-up.”\nIf the Fed does fall into that position, it may have to raise interest rates and otherwise tighten monetary policy sooner than it would like.\n“Normally, we end up with a recession because you have to slam on the brakes as opposed to slowly taking your foot off the accelerator, which is what believe is going to happen,” El-Erian said.\nThe economy is still technically in a recession that began in February 2020, according to the National Bureau of Economic Research, considered the official arbiter in such matters. However, real GDP is just a shade below where it was when the downturn started and is likely to pass that level when the second quarter data comes in.\nInflation, though, has thwarted recoveries in the past, and recent data tell conflicting stories about the current pace.\nThe Fed’s favorite gauge, the personal consumption expenditures price index excluding the volatile food and energy sectors, in May rose 3.4% from a year ago, the highest level since 1992 an well above the central bank’s 2% target.\nThat came after a 5% increase in the consumer price indexand a6.6% burst in the producer price index, both well higher than anything the U.S. has seen since at least before the financial crisis.\nBut much of the price pressures have come in areas particularly germane to the economic recovery – used car prices, air fares, hotel prices and the like.\nWhile Fed officials see those factors abating in the coming months, El-Erian said he’s not so sure, even if the financial markets don’t seem to care.\n“If you were actually to look at the numbers on inflation, you would start having serious doubts in your mind as to how transitory inflation is,” El-Erian said. “But as long as the Fed believes it’s transitory, that is what matters for markets.”","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":90,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":125845639,"gmtCreate":1624669318621,"gmtModify":1703843151535,"author":{"id":"3557531278630339","authorId":"3557531278630339","authorIdStr":"3557531278630339","name":"Hannee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2a23162818c1e2b051d79f5521b6ee57","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3557531278630339"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Sp500 is good indicator for stock rising.&nbsp;","listText":"Sp500 is good indicator for stock rising.&nbsp;","text":"Sp500 is good indicator for stock rising.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/125845639","repostId":"1177764085","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1177764085","pubTimestamp":1624662146,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1177764085?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-26 07:02","market":"us","language":"en","title":"S&P 500 climbs to another record led by bank shares, notches its best week since February","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1177764085","media":"CNBC","summary":"U.S. stocks rose on Friday with the S&P 500 building on its rally to records, as investors bet that ","content":"<div>\n<p>U.S. stocks rose on Friday with the S&P 500 building on its rally to records, as investors bet that higher inflation will be temporary as the economy continues to recover from the pandemic.\nThe broad ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/06/24/stock-market-futures-open-to-close-.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"cnbc_highlight","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>S&P 500 climbs to another record led by bank shares, notches its best week since February</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nS&P 500 climbs to another record led by bank shares, notches its best week since February\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-06-26 07:02 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.cnbc.com/2021/06/24/stock-market-futures-open-to-close-.html><strong>CNBC</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>U.S. stocks rose on Friday with the S&P 500 building on its rally to records, as investors bet that higher inflation will be temporary as the economy continues to recover from the pandemic.\nThe broad ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/06/24/stock-market-futures-open-to-close-.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index"},"source_url":"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/06/24/stock-market-futures-open-to-close-.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/72bb72e1b84c09fca865c6dcb1bbcd16","article_id":"1177764085","content_text":"U.S. stocks rose on Friday with the S&P 500 building on its rally to records, as investors bet that higher inflation will be temporary as the economy continues to recover from the pandemic.\nThe broad equity benchmark climbed 0.3% to hit another closing record high of 4,280.70. Financials were the best-performing S&P 500 sector with a 1.3% gain. The Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 237.02 points, or 0.7%, to 34,433.84, sitting less than 2% from its record. The Nasdaq Composite erased earlier gains and closed 0.1% lower at 14,360.39 amid a rise in bond yields. The 10-year Treasury yield jumped 4 basis points to 1.52%.\nThe S&P 500 rallied 2.7% for the week, notching its biggest weekly gain since early February. The Dow gained 3.4% this week for its best week since mid-March, while the Nasdaq advanced 2.4%.\nFriday’s rally came after a key inflation indicator that the Federal Reserve uses to set policy rose 3.4% in May, the fastest increase since the early 1990s, the Commerce Department reported Friday. The reading matched the expectation from economists polled by Dow Jones. The core index rose 0.5% for the month, which actually was below the 0.6% estimate.\nThe core personal consumption expenditures price index increase reflects the rapid pace of economic expansion and resulting price pressures, and amplified how far the nation has come since the pandemic-induced shutdown of 2020.\n“This provided support to the Fed’s argument that inflation is transitory and will help allay fears that we are witnessing runaway inflation,” said Anu Gaggar, senior global Investment analyst at Commonwealth Financial Network. “This should continue to provide support to risk assets such as equities.”\nBank shares jumped after the Federal Reserve announced the banking industry could easily withstand a severe recession. The Fed, in releasing the results of its annual stress test, said the 23 institutions in the 2021 exam remained “well above” minimum required capital levels during a hypothetical economic downturn. The decision cleared the way for the banks to raise dividends and buy back more stock, which was suspended during the pandemic.\nWells Fargo climbed 2.6%, while Fifth Third and PNC all gained over 2%. JPMorgan and Bank of America both rose more than 1%.\nNike’s stock surged 15.5%, helping to boost sentiment for the Dow. The company reported earnings and revenue that blew past Wall Street estimates. Digital sales also jumped 41% since last year and 147% from two years ago.\nOn the flipside,FedEx dipped 3.6% despite beating on the top and bottom lines of its earnings. FedEx also gave a strong yearly outlook.\nFriday saw heightened trading volume as FTSE Russell was set to rebalance its U.S. stock indexes at the market close. Bank of America estimated that more than $170 billion worth of shares would be changed hands as a result of 625 changes in total to Russell indexes, including the Russell 1000 and Russell 2000.\nPresident Joe Biden announced Thursday that the White House struck an infrastructure deal with a bipartisan group of senators. The lawmakers have worked for weeks to craft a roughly $1 trillion package that could get through Congress with support from both parties. The framework will include $579 billion in new spending on transportation like roads, bridges and rail, electric vehicle infrastructure and electric transit, among other things.\nThe stock market came back from last week’s swoon induced by worries about a tighter Federal Reserve. Last week, the Dow fell 3.5% and the S&P 500 shed 1.9% as the Fed moved up its timeline for interest-rate increases.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":66,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":126918044,"gmtCreate":1624541965888,"gmtModify":1703839813550,"author":{"id":"3557531278630339","authorId":"3557531278630339","authorIdStr":"3557531278630339","name":"Hannee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2a23162818c1e2b051d79f5521b6ee57","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3557531278630339"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hope sp500 continue hit high!&nbsp;","listText":"Hope sp500 continue hit high!&nbsp;","text":"Hope sp500 continue hit high!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/126918044","repostId":"1167326019","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1167326019","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1624541460,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1167326019?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-24 21:31","market":"us","language":"en","title":"S&P 500 rises to retake record at the open, wiping out last week’s Fed swoon","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1167326019","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"(June 24) The S&P 500 climbed on Thursday, surpassing its record high set a week ago as the market f","content":"<p>(June 24)&nbsp;The S&amp;P 500 climbed on Thursday, surpassing its record high set a week ago as the market fully recovered losses triggered by the Federal Reserve’s surprise policy pivot.</p>\n<p>The broad equity benchmark rose 0.5% to hit an all-time high, retaking its previous record on June 14. The Dow Jones Industrial Average added 207 points, or 0.6%. The Nasdaq Composite jumped 0.6% to reach another record.</p>\n<p>A broad group of stocks gained to push the benchmarks to new highs. Tesla added more than 2%, while GM and Caterpillar each gained about 1%.</p>\n<p>Data out Thursday showed jobless claimstotaled 411,000for the week ended June 19, higher than an estimate of 380,000 from economists polled by Dow Jones.</p>\n<p>Traders are also monitoringinfrastructure package negotiations.A bipartisan group of Senators that have made progress on a plan will meet President Joe Biden at the White House Thursday. The lawmakers have worked for weeks to craft a roughly $1 trillion package that could get through Congress with support from both parties. Republicans have fought the president’s proposal to hike the corporate tax rate to 28% from 21%</p>\n<p>Bank shares gained ahead of theFed's annual bank stress test results, which are scheduled for release after the bell on Thursday. The test examines how banks fare during various hypothetical economic downturns. Banks were forced to freeze dividends and stop buybacks during the pandemic. These results should give them the greenlight to eventually raise payouts. Goldman Sachs shares rose about 1%.</p>\n<p>Despite Wednesday's hiccup, the three major indexes are up more than 1% this week, rallying from a sell-off last week after the Fed heightened inflation expectations and forecast rate hikes as soon as 2023. Comments from Fed Chair Jerome Powell during a Congressional testimony Tuesdayreiterated that inflation pressures should be temporary, which seemed to soothe market sentiment.</p>\n<p>\"Beneath the optimism, markets are at risk of becoming complacent – and vulnerable to shocks. Any signal that interest rates and bond yields could rise, even in the absence of pronounced inflationary pressure, could shatter market exuberance,\" Gaurav Mallik,&nbsp;chief portfolio strategist&nbsp;at&nbsp;State Street&nbsp;Global Advisors, said.</p>\n<p>\"Central banks will walk a tightrope between allowing the economy to run hot – which history has shown to be a bad idea – and managing inflation risk,\" he added.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>S&P 500 rises to retake record at the open, wiping out last week’s Fed swoon</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nS&P 500 rises to retake record at the open, wiping out last week’s Fed swoon\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-06-24 21:31</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>(June 24)&nbsp;The S&amp;P 500 climbed on Thursday, surpassing its record high set a week ago as the market fully recovered losses triggered by the Federal Reserve’s surprise policy pivot.</p>\n<p>The broad equity benchmark rose 0.5% to hit an all-time high, retaking its previous record on June 14. The Dow Jones Industrial Average added 207 points, or 0.6%. The Nasdaq Composite jumped 0.6% to reach another record.</p>\n<p>A broad group of stocks gained to push the benchmarks to new highs. Tesla added more than 2%, while GM and Caterpillar each gained about 1%.</p>\n<p>Data out Thursday showed jobless claimstotaled 411,000for the week ended June 19, higher than an estimate of 380,000 from economists polled by Dow Jones.</p>\n<p>Traders are also monitoringinfrastructure package negotiations.A bipartisan group of Senators that have made progress on a plan will meet President Joe Biden at the White House Thursday. The lawmakers have worked for weeks to craft a roughly $1 trillion package that could get through Congress with support from both parties. Republicans have fought the president’s proposal to hike the corporate tax rate to 28% from 21%</p>\n<p>Bank shares gained ahead of theFed's annual bank stress test results, which are scheduled for release after the bell on Thursday. The test examines how banks fare during various hypothetical economic downturns. Banks were forced to freeze dividends and stop buybacks during the pandemic. These results should give them the greenlight to eventually raise payouts. Goldman Sachs shares rose about 1%.</p>\n<p>Despite Wednesday's hiccup, the three major indexes are up more than 1% this week, rallying from a sell-off last week after the Fed heightened inflation expectations and forecast rate hikes as soon as 2023. Comments from Fed Chair Jerome Powell during a Congressional testimony Tuesdayreiterated that inflation pressures should be temporary, which seemed to soothe market sentiment.</p>\n<p>\"Beneath the optimism, markets are at risk of becoming complacent – and vulnerable to shocks. Any signal that interest rates and bond yields could rise, even in the absence of pronounced inflationary pressure, could shatter market exuberance,\" Gaurav Mallik,&nbsp;chief portfolio strategist&nbsp;at&nbsp;State Street&nbsp;Global Advisors, said.</p>\n<p>\"Central banks will walk a tightrope between allowing the economy to run hot – which history has shown to be a bad idea – and managing inflation risk,\" he added.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯","SPY":"标普500ETF"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1167326019","content_text":"(June 24) The S&P 500 climbed on Thursday, surpassing its record high set a week ago as the market fully recovered losses triggered by the Federal Reserve’s surprise policy pivot.\nThe broad equity benchmark rose 0.5% to hit an all-time high, retaking its previous record on June 14. The Dow Jones Industrial Average added 207 points, or 0.6%. The Nasdaq Composite jumped 0.6% to reach another record.\nA broad group of stocks gained to push the benchmarks to new highs. Tesla added more than 2%, while GM and Caterpillar each gained about 1%.\nData out Thursday showed jobless claimstotaled 411,000for the week ended June 19, higher than an estimate of 380,000 from economists polled by Dow Jones.\nTraders are also monitoringinfrastructure package negotiations.A bipartisan group of Senators that have made progress on a plan will meet President Joe Biden at the White House Thursday. The lawmakers have worked for weeks to craft a roughly $1 trillion package that could get through Congress with support from both parties. Republicans have fought the president’s proposal to hike the corporate tax rate to 28% from 21%\nBank shares gained ahead of theFed's annual bank stress test results, which are scheduled for release after the bell on Thursday. The test examines how banks fare during various hypothetical economic downturns. Banks were forced to freeze dividends and stop buybacks during the pandemic. These results should give them the greenlight to eventually raise payouts. Goldman Sachs shares rose about 1%.\nDespite Wednesday's hiccup, the three major indexes are up more than 1% this week, rallying from a sell-off last week after the Fed heightened inflation expectations and forecast rate hikes as soon as 2023. Comments from Fed Chair Jerome Powell during a Congressional testimony Tuesdayreiterated that inflation pressures should be temporary, which seemed to soothe market sentiment.\n\"Beneath the optimism, markets are at risk of becoming complacent – and vulnerable to shocks. Any signal that interest rates and bond yields could rise, even in the absence of pronounced inflationary pressure, could shatter market exuberance,\" Gaurav Mallik, chief portfolio strategist at State Street Global Advisors, said.\n\"Central banks will walk a tightrope between allowing the economy to run hot – which history has shown to be a bad idea – and managing inflation risk,\" he added.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":29,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":126078417,"gmtCreate":1624540332539,"gmtModify":1703839757469,"author":{"id":"3557531278630339","authorId":"3557531278630339","authorIdStr":"3557531278630339","name":"Hannee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2a23162818c1e2b051d79f5521b6ee57","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3557531278630339"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Gg!!","listText":"Gg!!","text":"Gg!!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/126078417","repostId":"1172727653","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":146,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":129027186,"gmtCreate":1624346323545,"gmtModify":1703834060460,"author":{"id":"3557531278630339","authorId":"3557531278630339","authorIdStr":"3557531278630339","name":"Hannee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2a23162818c1e2b051d79f5521b6ee57","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3557531278630339"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"She is powerful lady !","listText":"She is powerful lady !","text":"She is powerful lady !","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/129027186","repostId":"2145603388","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2145603388","pubTimestamp":1624343547,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2145603388?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-22 14:32","market":"hk","language":"zh","title":"董小姐：你还能拿出什么来拯救格力？","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2145603388","media":"格隆汇","summary":"董明珠的最后一搏","content":"<p><b>原文首发于6月21日</b></p>\n<p>怼友商，骂股东，战宝能，当网红，有董小姐的地方，总会有动地惊天的的举动。</p>\n<p>昨晚，董小姐大手一挥，以27.68元/股，相当于目前股价的5折，给12000员工股权激励，她自己一个人则占了总数的27%，总金额8亿。股权激励这种事情在上市公司中见怪不怪，但问题在于董小姐的价格便宜，受众多，而股权激励的条件貌似也没那么难达到。<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/77da93f2e9f309abab3b87f182c7647d\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"363\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">这就给人落下话柄。<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/38dd29afd9c59a39e6f9bab3ad012058\" tg-width=\"560\" tg-height=\"537\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0a3b5276209f2a9f1a4cb4af931d88c6\" tg-width=\"570\" tg-height=\"773\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>格力今天的股价开盘大跌超过4%，全日以4.79%的跌幅收场，证明资本市场对股权激励是意见非常大。</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5fe85dbe155ca360fcb77322303f08f5\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"457\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>但是，质疑归质疑，董小姐既然敢做，多半也已成定局，明眼人都看得出来，董小姐正在下一盘大棋，而这盘大棋，更像是董小姐的最后一场战斗。</p>\n<h3>1</h3>\n<h3><b>周期下行，回天乏力</b></h3>\n<p>和美的比起来，格力日子确实过得不咋地。美的虽然空调业务比不上格力，但是多元化的成功，使得它明显处于领先地位。</p>\n<p>2020年，美的的营收为2857.10亿，同比微涨2.27%，净利润275.07亿，同比增长8.82%，而格力的营收只有1704.97亿，同比倒退14.97%，净利润222.79亿，同比倒退10.26%。</p>\n<p>最新市值，美的为5072亿，格力为3074亿，格力只有美的的60%。去年3月的股市的低位，美的和格力市值相相差不大，但一年过去，美的股价涨了67%，格力只涨了10%。</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7c32ddc97e0c42fe52ab9cce960c96ca\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"629\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/36a208956aadd36ad578c59e1987d412\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"640\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>高瓴2019年400亿真金白金砸进去，到现在已经3年过去了，不过赚了10来个点，如果算上其中一半资金是银行贷款，光每年交的利息，和其他投资比起来，格力算得上败笔。</p>\n<p>很明显，格力已经不复当年勇，曾经的大白马，沦落到今天的位置，令人扼腕叹息。但这一切，其实都源于董小姐的一个执念。</p>\n<p>当年，董小姐以洞悉一切的战略眼光，坚定地让格力all in空调赛道，非常有道理，因为在房地产辉煌的时代，家电作为配套，必定受益于此，但问题只在于，到底什么样的家电受益最大？</p>\n<p>董小姐给出了自己的答案--空调。确实，在所有建筑中，空调是最不可或缺的，比如写字楼可以没有洗衣机，没有电冰箱，没有电视机，通信机房也可以没有任何家用电器，餐厅也是如此，但要是没有空调试试？尤其是大热天，根本不可能。</p>\n<p>董小姐的逻辑在于，<b>老娘选了最大公约数，然后死磕到底，做到最极致，这等于说“我在家电最大的细分市场，占据了最大的份额，赚钱那是小case”，这种战略直接把格力推上全球首屈一指的空调老大位置。</b></p>\n<p>在商言商，单品还是多元化，本没有对错，只要在合适的时点选择合适的战略，都有成功的可能性。只是，花无百日红，任何合适的战略，都会随着环境的变化而失效，等到红利释放完，公司需要转型却又转不好的时候，问题就随之出现了。</p>\n<p>现在的格力，正好处在这个阶段，产品多元化错过了最好的时机，坑已经被美的占了，网上渠道也慢人半拍，现在才开始疯狂补救。更惨的是，地产已经处于周期下行，主营收入--空调业务更遭遇难以逆转的下行。</p>\n<h3>2</h3>\n<h3><b>成也董小姐，败也董小姐</b></h3>\n<p>格力的问题，相信董小姐也是看得很清楚的，她应该也明白不能老靠空调这条腿走路，所以她很早就开始为格力谋求转型，但问题就在于，几次重大转型都是雷声大雨点小。做手机，不了了之；做新能源汽车，踩了银隆这个坑；做芯片，到现在也知道究竟做了啥。</p>\n<p>从大方向上看，董小姐的战略眼光值得肯定，想法也很到位，比如通过手机打通家电，做IoT物联网，这是谁都否认不了的大趋势，小米、美的、海尔，甚至包括国美都有涉及；做新能源汽车就更不用说，只要看看现在多少资本涌入这个赛道就知道了；芯片也因为中美贸易战抢足了眼球。</p>\n<p>所以，大家就更纳闷，既然方向没有错，凭借董小姐的能力，还有格力的财力、人才实力、技术实力，再怎么说也不至于混成现在这个模样，到底格力怎么啦？</p>\n<p>其实，从董明珠坐上<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/000651\">格力电器</a>董事长那天起，格力已经被深深地烙上了董明珠烙印，可谓成也董明珠，败也董明珠。</p>\n<p>如果用一句话概括董明珠的个性，那就是<b>固执</b>。</p>\n<p>先声明一下，这里讲的固执，是中性词，本身并不带节奏，汉语字典的解释“本指坚持不懈，后多指坚持成见”。</p>\n<p>所以，如果方向对，那固执就变成坚持到底，褒义多一点；如果大方向错了，那固执自然就变成死板、不懂变通。</p>\n<p>从董小姐的一言一行，处处都留有她固执的痕迹，她认为对的东西，就容不得反对声音。比如她当年力排众议，让格力倾全公司之力押注空调，取得巨大成功；又比如当年闹得沸沸扬扬的，因为中小股东反对投资银隆而被骂得狗血淋头一事，不同的是，最终证明银隆是个坑。</p>\n<p>这也说明中小股东当初的反对是正确的，反倒是董明珠，并非完人，不是每一次出手都必胜。</p>\n<p>从公司的生命周期上看，转型是无法避免的，但转型能否成功，除了领导人的战略眼光、外部的竞争环境、政策环境等，更在于公司自身对转型的支持，比如组织架构能够适应转型，财力足不足够，人才能不能招到，等等，这是一个系统性的大工程，当中任何一个环节出问题，转型都可能折戟沉沙。<b>所以，数次转型失败，合理的解释就是董明珠的战略方向可能和格力自身情况产生冲突，简而言之，就是没有实事求是。</b></p>\n<p>而导致这个问题的背后原因，很可能是董小姐已经成为格力的一言堂，有反对声音，得到的回馈就是一阵痛骂，所以真正理性的声音，被淹没。</p>\n<p>其实，从公司治理的角度出发，股东作为出资人，绝对有资格否定他们认为不对的议案，股东不同意格力投资银隆，很正常，毕竟格力是做家电出身，涉足电动车属于跨界，这步子迈得有点大，所以股东们谨慎小心。这是一种制约，也是一种警醒。</p>\n<p>反倒是董小姐，虽然坐在董事长的位置，但她不过是董事长请来的职业经理人，公司不是她一个人的，她有什么资格怒怼股东？难不成真的把格力当成自己的私家后院？想干嘛干嘛？</p>\n<p>当然，也有人为董小姐喊冤，当年珠海国资委是格力大股东，官员的保守、求稳性格，限制了董小姐的发挥，间接也使得格力错失很多转型良机，如果不是董小姐的固执，格力必定落入平庸之列，所以格力有今天，董小姐是居功至伟。</p>\n<p>不过，格力是全体股东的格力，并非董小姐一人之格力，如果一家公众公司被置于一人手掌，那这个人就很容易膨胀，当底下的人再也不敢提反对意见的时候，广大投资者或许就只能自求多福了。</p>\n<h3>3</h3>\n<h3><b>格力的未来在哪里？</b></h3>\n<p>关于格力的未来，相信很多人都没有答案。</p>\n<p>即使格力把空调电机、冷凝机和压缩机技术做得再好，把智能化霜技术、高效离心技术做得再溜，也很难逃脱行业的周期下行，过度依赖空调这个单品战略，很明显已经走到尽头，虽然名义上还可以打打存量替换，打打海外生意，但这与过去的高增长，不同日而语。</p>\n<p>其实，董小姐也很焦虑的，66岁的高龄，还出来当网红，为格力站台，确实称得上为格力鞠躬尽瘁。坊间称董小姐这次的股权激励明摆着是抢股东的钱，然后为自己退休享受生活敛财，这种说法就有点小家子气了，董小姐做到现在这个位置，如果还因为钱毁掉半生名誉，那真的是脑子进水了，再说，她像是缺钱的人吗？</p>\n<p><b>所以，合理的解释就在于董小姐要为格力做最后一搏，让格力重回一线大白马行列。</b>在一家呆了近30年，并亲手将她建成全球空调一哥，想必董小姐对格力也是爱得深沉，足以让她奋不顾身。加上广大投资者的焦虑，尤其是砸了400亿进去的张磊，虽然没在董事会有席位，但相信因为股价低迷，他也没少找董小姐理论。</p>\n<p>兵马未动粮草先行，这次股权激励，把人马都绑在自己麾下，或者只是董小姐大棋中的一步。问题只是在于，董小姐这盘大棋究竟是什么？是继续在家电这个赛道上拓展，像美的那样做小家电、建网上渠道，还是像她当初那样做跨界？</p>\n<p>我们没有答案，作为投资者，看着格力的股价低迷多时，我们也很想格力能来个困境反转，但是，现在的董明珠，已经没有珠海国资委的束缚，在格力处于绝对权威地位，你有信心她能拯救格力吗？</p>\n<p>又或者，没有董明珠的格力，会不会更好？</p>","source":"gelonghui_highlight","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>董小姐：你还能拿出什么来拯救格力？</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n董小姐：你还能拿出什么来拯救格力？\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-06-22 14:32 北京时间&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=http://www.gelonghui.com/p/471123><strong>格隆汇</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>原文首发于6月21日\n怼友商，骂股东，战宝能，当网红，有董小姐的地方，总会有动地惊天的的举动。\n昨晚，董小姐大手一挥，以27.68元/股，相当于目前股价的5折，给12000员工股权激励，她自己一个人则占了总数的27%，总金额8亿。股权激励这种事情在上市公司中见怪不怪，但问题在于董小姐的价格便宜，受众多，而股权激励的条件貌似也没那么难达到。这就给人落下话柄。\n\n格力今天的股价开盘大跌超过4%，全日以...</p>\n\n<a href=\"http://www.gelonghui.com/p/471123\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c7fbe9ddf0c99060a7af233d1996d96b","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"http://www.gelonghui.com/p/471123","is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/6b8fa6424aebe95f6781d04ef17a1852","article_id":"2145603388","content_text":"原文首发于6月21日\n怼友商，骂股东，战宝能，当网红，有董小姐的地方，总会有动地惊天的的举动。\n昨晚，董小姐大手一挥，以27.68元/股，相当于目前股价的5折，给12000员工股权激励，她自己一个人则占了总数的27%，总金额8亿。股权激励这种事情在上市公司中见怪不怪，但问题在于董小姐的价格便宜，受众多，而股权激励的条件貌似也没那么难达到。这就给人落下话柄。\n\n格力今天的股价开盘大跌超过4%，全日以4.79%的跌幅收场，证明资本市场对股权激励是意见非常大。\n\n但是，质疑归质疑，董小姐既然敢做，多半也已成定局，明眼人都看得出来，董小姐正在下一盘大棋，而这盘大棋，更像是董小姐的最后一场战斗。\n1\n周期下行，回天乏力\n和美的比起来，格力日子确实过得不咋地。美的虽然空调业务比不上格力，但是多元化的成功，使得它明显处于领先地位。\n2020年，美的的营收为2857.10亿，同比微涨2.27%，净利润275.07亿，同比增长8.82%，而格力的营收只有1704.97亿，同比倒退14.97%，净利润222.79亿，同比倒退10.26%。\n最新市值，美的为5072亿，格力为3074亿，格力只有美的的60%。去年3月的股市的低位，美的和格力市值相相差不大，但一年过去，美的股价涨了67%，格力只涨了10%。\n\n\n高瓴2019年400亿真金白金砸进去，到现在已经3年过去了，不过赚了10来个点，如果算上其中一半资金是银行贷款，光每年交的利息，和其他投资比起来，格力算得上败笔。\n很明显，格力已经不复当年勇，曾经的大白马，沦落到今天的位置，令人扼腕叹息。但这一切，其实都源于董小姐的一个执念。\n当年，董小姐以洞悉一切的战略眼光，坚定地让格力all in空调赛道，非常有道理，因为在房地产辉煌的时代，家电作为配套，必定受益于此，但问题只在于，到底什么样的家电受益最大？\n董小姐给出了自己的答案--空调。确实，在所有建筑中，空调是最不可或缺的，比如写字楼可以没有洗衣机，没有电冰箱，没有电视机，通信机房也可以没有任何家用电器，餐厅也是如此，但要是没有空调试试？尤其是大热天，根本不可能。\n董小姐的逻辑在于，老娘选了最大公约数，然后死磕到底，做到最极致，这等于说“我在家电最大的细分市场，占据了最大的份额，赚钱那是小case”，这种战略直接把格力推上全球首屈一指的空调老大位置。\n在商言商，单品还是多元化，本没有对错，只要在合适的时点选择合适的战略，都有成功的可能性。只是，花无百日红，任何合适的战略，都会随着环境的变化而失效，等到红利释放完，公司需要转型却又转不好的时候，问题就随之出现了。\n现在的格力，正好处在这个阶段，产品多元化错过了最好的时机，坑已经被美的占了，网上渠道也慢人半拍，现在才开始疯狂补救。更惨的是，地产已经处于周期下行，主营收入--空调业务更遭遇难以逆转的下行。\n2\n成也董小姐，败也董小姐\n格力的问题，相信董小姐也是看得很清楚的，她应该也明白不能老靠空调这条腿走路，所以她很早就开始为格力谋求转型，但问题就在于，几次重大转型都是雷声大雨点小。做手机，不了了之；做新能源汽车，踩了银隆这个坑；做芯片，到现在也知道究竟做了啥。\n从大方向上看，董小姐的战略眼光值得肯定，想法也很到位，比如通过手机打通家电，做IoT物联网，这是谁都否认不了的大趋势，小米、美的、海尔，甚至包括国美都有涉及；做新能源汽车就更不用说，只要看看现在多少资本涌入这个赛道就知道了；芯片也因为中美贸易战抢足了眼球。\n所以，大家就更纳闷，既然方向没有错，凭借董小姐的能力，还有格力的财力、人才实力、技术实力，再怎么说也不至于混成现在这个模样，到底格力怎么啦？\n其实，从董明珠坐上格力电器董事长那天起，格力已经被深深地烙上了董明珠烙印，可谓成也董明珠，败也董明珠。\n如果用一句话概括董明珠的个性，那就是固执。\n先声明一下，这里讲的固执，是中性词，本身并不带节奏，汉语字典的解释“本指坚持不懈，后多指坚持成见”。\n所以，如果方向对，那固执就变成坚持到底，褒义多一点；如果大方向错了，那固执自然就变成死板、不懂变通。\n从董小姐的一言一行，处处都留有她固执的痕迹，她认为对的东西，就容不得反对声音。比如她当年力排众议，让格力倾全公司之力押注空调，取得巨大成功；又比如当年闹得沸沸扬扬的，因为中小股东反对投资银隆而被骂得狗血淋头一事，不同的是，最终证明银隆是个坑。\n这也说明中小股东当初的反对是正确的，反倒是董明珠，并非完人，不是每一次出手都必胜。\n从公司的生命周期上看，转型是无法避免的，但转型能否成功，除了领导人的战略眼光、外部的竞争环境、政策环境等，更在于公司自身对转型的支持，比如组织架构能够适应转型，财力足不足够，人才能不能招到，等等，这是一个系统性的大工程，当中任何一个环节出问题，转型都可能折戟沉沙。所以，数次转型失败，合理的解释就是董明珠的战略方向可能和格力自身情况产生冲突，简而言之，就是没有实事求是。\n而导致这个问题的背后原因，很可能是董小姐已经成为格力的一言堂，有反对声音，得到的回馈就是一阵痛骂，所以真正理性的声音，被淹没。\n其实，从公司治理的角度出发，股东作为出资人，绝对有资格否定他们认为不对的议案，股东不同意格力投资银隆，很正常，毕竟格力是做家电出身，涉足电动车属于跨界，这步子迈得有点大，所以股东们谨慎小心。这是一种制约，也是一种警醒。\n反倒是董小姐，虽然坐在董事长的位置，但她不过是董事长请来的职业经理人，公司不是她一个人的，她有什么资格怒怼股东？难不成真的把格力当成自己的私家后院？想干嘛干嘛？\n当然，也有人为董小姐喊冤，当年珠海国资委是格力大股东，官员的保守、求稳性格，限制了董小姐的发挥，间接也使得格力错失很多转型良机，如果不是董小姐的固执，格力必定落入平庸之列，所以格力有今天，董小姐是居功至伟。\n不过，格力是全体股东的格力，并非董小姐一人之格力，如果一家公众公司被置于一人手掌，那这个人就很容易膨胀，当底下的人再也不敢提反对意见的时候，广大投资者或许就只能自求多福了。\n3\n格力的未来在哪里？\n关于格力的未来，相信很多人都没有答案。\n即使格力把空调电机、冷凝机和压缩机技术做得再好，把智能化霜技术、高效离心技术做得再溜，也很难逃脱行业的周期下行，过度依赖空调这个单品战略，很明显已经走到尽头，虽然名义上还可以打打存量替换，打打海外生意，但这与过去的高增长，不同日而语。\n其实，董小姐也很焦虑的，66岁的高龄，还出来当网红，为格力站台，确实称得上为格力鞠躬尽瘁。坊间称董小姐这次的股权激励明摆着是抢股东的钱，然后为自己退休享受生活敛财，这种说法就有点小家子气了，董小姐做到现在这个位置，如果还因为钱毁掉半生名誉，那真的是脑子进水了，再说，她像是缺钱的人吗？\n所以，合理的解释就在于董小姐要为格力做最后一搏，让格力重回一线大白马行列。在一家呆了近30年，并亲手将她建成全球空调一哥，想必董小姐对格力也是爱得深沉，足以让她奋不顾身。加上广大投资者的焦虑，尤其是砸了400亿进去的张磊，虽然没在董事会有席位，但相信因为股价低迷，他也没少找董小姐理论。\n兵马未动粮草先行，这次股权激励，把人马都绑在自己麾下，或者只是董小姐大棋中的一步。问题只是在于，董小姐这盘大棋究竟是什么？是继续在家电这个赛道上拓展，像美的那样做小家电、建网上渠道，还是像她当初那样做跨界？\n我们没有答案，作为投资者，看着格力的股价低迷多时，我们也很想格力能来个困境反转，但是，现在的董明珠，已经没有珠海国资委的束缚，在格力处于绝对权威地位，你有信心她能拯救格力吗？\n又或者，没有董明珠的格力，会不会更好？","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":55,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":129024938,"gmtCreate":1624346233424,"gmtModify":1703834058673,"author":{"id":"3557531278630339","authorId":"3557531278630339","authorIdStr":"3557531278630339","name":"Hannee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2a23162818c1e2b051d79f5521b6ee57","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3557531278630339"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Why hdl drooped so&nbsp;much? China unlocked now. Consuming should boost up!&nbsp;","listText":"Why hdl drooped so&nbsp;much? China unlocked now. Consuming should boost up!&nbsp;","text":"Why hdl drooped so much? China unlocked now. Consuming should boost up!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/129024938","repostId":"2145185037","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2145185037","pubTimestamp":1624344564,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2145185037?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-22 14:49","market":"hk","language":"zh","title":"海底捞跌入海底","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2145185037","media":"观察者网","summary":"6月21日，#海底捞市值蒸发超2400亿港元#登上微博热搜，继上周市值跌破2000亿港元之后，海底捞今日股价再度跌超5%，四个月市值跌超2500亿港元。往前追溯一周，6月15日，开盘后的海底捞股价大跌","content":"<p>6月21日，#<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/06862\">海底捞</a>市值蒸发超2400亿港元#登上<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/WB\">微博</a>热搜，继上周市值跌破2000亿港元之后，海底捞今日股价再度跌超5%，四个月市值跌超2500亿港元。往前追溯一周，6月15日，开盘后的海底捞股价大跌近7%，至37.05港元，创出新低，盘中最低跌至1964亿港元。</p>\n<p>二级市场“败退”背后，是海底捞步步下跌的翻台率。根据海底捞年报数据显示，2019年海底捞餐厅一线和二线城市的翻台率分别为4.7/4.9次/天，较2018年5.1/5.3次/天均下降0.4次/天。2020年，海底捞餐厅整体翻台率为3.5次/天；2021年5月初，公司内部人士曾向券商透露4月份餐厅翻台率不到3次/天。这意味着，在餐饮行业大复苏的背景下，海底捞的翻台率却一直在下降。</p>\n<p>根据 <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/002736\">国信证券</a> 的测算，海底捞单店守住盈亏的平衡线为翻台率3次/天。因此，跌破3次/天也表示海底捞单店处于亏损或者微利状态。</p>\n<p>凭借着24小时营业和多业态服务的经营模式，海底捞迅速填补了中国夜生活市场的空缺，并制造属于海底捞自己的火锅业服务标准。在新消费趋势下获得许多食客好评，这也让海底捞有底气持续扩张，加快分店开设速度。</p>\n<p>然而，随着海底捞2020年财报的发布，外界也进一步窥探到这家火锅巨企在疫情之下的阵面，其市值更是从巅峰时期的4500亿港元跌至今日的不到2000亿港元。</p>\n<p>市值跌超2500亿港元背后，我们应该如何看待这样一家企业？</p>\n<p>01</p>\n<p>海底泡沫有多大</p>\n<p>市值跌下神坛的海底捞无疑正在经历着前所未有的至暗时刻。</p>\n<p>4500亿港元的故事是资本市场对于海底捞的估价，但这真的“名副其实”吗？从股价增长来看，在疫情大面积影响餐饮业情况下，海底捞确实实现了逆势增长，增长背后是二级市场的看好，同时也意味着对海底捞门店快速扩张的肯定，毕竟开店数量的增加往往意味着总营收的增加。门店数目越多，规模效应就越明显。</p>\n<p>数据显示，截至2020年年底，海底捞餐厅数为1298家，相比上年同期的768家增加了530家。其中1205家位于中国大陆，93家位于中国大陆以外14个国家和地区。</p>\n<p>2017年～2019年，是海底捞的“黄金时代”。这些年海底捞的门店数量以41%的年复合增长率进行扩张，整体餐厅翻台率始终保持高位，达到平均4.9次/天。翻台率的坚挺是营收和利润持续增长的最强保障，2019年业绩报告显示，海底捞全年实现收入265.56亿元，同比增长了56.5%，净利润23.47亿元，同比增长42.3%。</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/004059ef41e3cf25796f959fd6f3218b\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"310\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>▲图：海底捞官微</p>\n<p>从2019年即以前海底捞的扩张速度来看，即便是处于高速增长，利润和翻台率依旧没有下跌。而到了2020年，海底捞营业收入为286.14亿元，比2019年增长7.8%；年内溢利3.10亿元，比2019年下降86.8%?。海底捞在公告中表示，餐厅网络拓展是整体收入增长的主要驱动力。2020年海底捞营收的增长背后，是开店持续低效的大额投入。</p>\n<p>在股价和市值“疯狂”上涨背后，海底捞的泡沫也开始逐渐膨胀。</p>\n<p>疫情袭来，危机席卷了整个餐饮业。此时的海底捞并没有叫停原定的门店增开计划，而在市场需求紧缩背景下，短时间内大面积开店，不仅拉低了同区域其他门店的翻台率，新开分店本身大概率也难短期内盈利。同时，就海底捞本身规模来看，一二线城市餐饮需求最强大的区域在2020年及以前已经完成了覆盖。在深入一二线城市非中心领域和三四线城市过程中，海底捞有些过于着急。</p>\n<p>对于这样快速想要占领空白市场的巨头来说，今天资本市场的反应似乎说明了一切。</p>\n<p>02</p>\n<p>火锅还是服务</p>\n<p>当我们谈起海底捞，想起的第一个词是“火锅”还是“服务”？</p>\n<p>服务几乎成了海底捞的代名词。但海底捞主体业务所处的餐饮市场与服务业的规律却又大相径庭。</p>\n<p>火锅的市场规模可达万亿，海底捞的市场份额为6%，一方面，随着火锅业垂直赛道不断细分，除了海底捞，重庆火锅、潮汕牛肉火锅、牛蛙火锅也成为热门品类，另一方面，品牌数目的增多导致业内呈现多样化趋势，从火锅口味上很难以差异化优势取胜。</p>\n<p>纵观海底捞近几年的发展，火锅业背后，服务业的优势已然成为海底捞的第二级增长点，也是在扩张中保持领先的制胜法宝。“宾至如归”的服务为海底捞赢得了良好口碑，并保持着高于行业水准的用户粘性。</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/abb02eb79735a38b3a6201da9e9d0030\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"333\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>▲图：海底捞官微</p>\n<p>然而，大规模扩张下沉市场带来了更多不同层次的客群用户，在提供服务过程中不可控性也增加了。今年5月，一则男子在海底捞内吃出蟑螂迅速上了头版头条，虽然最后被证明是男子自导自演的栽赃陷害，但一时不明真相的受众依然迅速将矛头直指海底捞，这也说明依托服务的海底捞，不得不随时面对外界时不时的“名誉挑战”。未来，面对更加多样化受众，如何去处理非典型客群，这也会为海底捞带来业绩之外的压力。</p>\n<p>另一方面，门店扩张也带来了管理难度的加大。过去海底捞优质化的餐饮服务已经成为了行业标杆，随着分店的开张，管理质量能否继续保持有待考究。网络上，抱怨“海底捞服务不如从前”的用户不在少数，想要继续保证服务水平和质量，海底捞不得不进一步加强管理上的投入。</p>\n<p>可以说，以服务为卖点始终只能锦上添花，扎实的产品质量才能保证企业的可持续发展。尤其是餐饮行业，做常青树本身已然十分困难，品牌层出不穷，大众的口味时刻也在变化，用服务吸引用户到店是海底捞的长板，但在火锅市场趋于饱和，疫情冲击大背景下，仅仅只有服务，不仅无法满足受众，资本也不会长期买单。</p>\n<p>03</p>\n<p>海底捞，何以捞</p>\n<p>估值腰斩，业绩下滑，海底捞的“双杀”困境如何解决？</p>\n<p>在疫情期间逆势扩张更像是海底捞在餐饮市场的一场豪赌。短线来看，开店确实影响了资金流和翻台率，让海底捞的“财报”没有那么好看，估值也颇受影响。但长期来看，在疫情复苏的大背景下，这也不失为一种长期策略。</p>\n<p>然而，比起资金投入带来的困境，品牌重新定位才是当代最紧要的。就目前现状来看，处于增长期的海底捞估值仍然在高位。彭博数据显示，1999～2007年是<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SBUX\">星巴克</a>的高速增长时期，估值中枢为57倍。海底捞过去三年的估值中枢约为242倍，因此尽管市值腰斩，但这也只是让海底捞的市盈率回到了相对正常的高位。</p>\n<p>业界普遍认为，此次回调很可能是永久性的。海底捞已经过了快速扩张带来的红利期，在固有的经营模式下，翻台率回升和盈利能否回涨目前仍是未知数。而这也就意味着海底捞需要寻找第二增长曲线。</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/79533db998adccab4fd6a4d03b3ae31c\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"333\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>▲图：海底捞官微</p>\n<p>另一方面，新的入局者也在给海底捞带来新的压力。哥老官、小龙坎、八合里等乘着网红经济走红的火锅店，也在不断对海底捞的霸主地位发起挑战，把目光放到更宽广的整个餐饮领域，各个餐饮品牌也在层出不穷的涌现。</p>\n<p>从现在海底捞呈交的答卷来看，关于海底捞的未来，外界并没有看出明确的答案。在食品安全，服务品质等被外界质疑的因素外，海底捞在擅长的服务领域也呈现出缓慢失势的状态，并且目前暂时也没有新的业务驱动其更快速的发展，未来能否持续增长也是外界颇为关注的焦点。</p>\n<p>想要持续坐稳餐饮第一股，并非想象中容易，除了必须要有过硬的产品和实力。如何调动起现行的餐饮矩阵，实现新的业绩增长正成为是海底捞的重中之重。</p>","source":"tencent","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>海底捞跌入海底</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n海底捞跌入海底\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-06-22 14:49 北京时间&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=http://gu.qq.com/resources/shy/news/detail-v2/index.html#/?id=nesSN2021062210504179c92f24&s=b><strong>观察者网</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>6月21日，#海底捞市值蒸发超2400亿港元#登上微博热搜，继上周市值跌破2000亿港元之后，海底捞今日股价再度跌超5%，四个月市值跌超2500亿港元。往前追溯一周，6月15日，开盘后的海底捞股价大跌近7%，至37.05港元，创出新低，盘中最低跌至1964亿港元。\n二级市场“败退”背后，是海底捞步步下跌的翻台率。根据海底捞年报数据显示，2019年海底捞餐厅一线和二线城市的翻台率分别为4.7/4.9...</p>\n\n<a href=\"http://gu.qq.com/resources/shy/news/detail-v2/index.html#/?id=nesSN2021062210504179c92f24&s=b\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/23f2c25e060d113f3768c45cafc16292","relate_stocks":{"06862":"海底捞"},"source_url":"http://gu.qq.com/resources/shy/news/detail-v2/index.html#/?id=nesSN2021062210504179c92f24&s=b","is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/9a95c1376e76363c1401fee7d3717173","article_id":"2145185037","content_text":"6月21日，#海底捞市值蒸发超2400亿港元#登上微博热搜，继上周市值跌破2000亿港元之后，海底捞今日股价再度跌超5%，四个月市值跌超2500亿港元。往前追溯一周，6月15日，开盘后的海底捞股价大跌近7%，至37.05港元，创出新低，盘中最低跌至1964亿港元。\n二级市场“败退”背后，是海底捞步步下跌的翻台率。根据海底捞年报数据显示，2019年海底捞餐厅一线和二线城市的翻台率分别为4.7/4.9次/天，较2018年5.1/5.3次/天均下降0.4次/天。2020年，海底捞餐厅整体翻台率为3.5次/天；2021年5月初，公司内部人士曾向券商透露4月份餐厅翻台率不到3次/天。这意味着，在餐饮行业大复苏的背景下，海底捞的翻台率却一直在下降。\n根据 国信证券 的测算，海底捞单店守住盈亏的平衡线为翻台率3次/天。因此，跌破3次/天也表示海底捞单店处于亏损或者微利状态。\n凭借着24小时营业和多业态服务的经营模式，海底捞迅速填补了中国夜生活市场的空缺，并制造属于海底捞自己的火锅业服务标准。在新消费趋势下获得许多食客好评，这也让海底捞有底气持续扩张，加快分店开设速度。\n然而，随着海底捞2020年财报的发布，外界也进一步窥探到这家火锅巨企在疫情之下的阵面，其市值更是从巅峰时期的4500亿港元跌至今日的不到2000亿港元。\n市值跌超2500亿港元背后，我们应该如何看待这样一家企业？\n01\n海底泡沫有多大\n市值跌下神坛的海底捞无疑正在经历着前所未有的至暗时刻。\n4500亿港元的故事是资本市场对于海底捞的估价，但这真的“名副其实”吗？从股价增长来看，在疫情大面积影响餐饮业情况下，海底捞确实实现了逆势增长，增长背后是二级市场的看好，同时也意味着对海底捞门店快速扩张的肯定，毕竟开店数量的增加往往意味着总营收的增加。门店数目越多，规模效应就越明显。\n数据显示，截至2020年年底，海底捞餐厅数为1298家，相比上年同期的768家增加了530家。其中1205家位于中国大陆，93家位于中国大陆以外14个国家和地区。\n2017年～2019年，是海底捞的“黄金时代”。这些年海底捞的门店数量以41%的年复合增长率进行扩张，整体餐厅翻台率始终保持高位，达到平均4.9次/天。翻台率的坚挺是营收和利润持续增长的最强保障，2019年业绩报告显示，海底捞全年实现收入265.56亿元，同比增长了56.5%，净利润23.47亿元，同比增长42.3%。\n\n▲图：海底捞官微\n从2019年即以前海底捞的扩张速度来看，即便是处于高速增长，利润和翻台率依旧没有下跌。而到了2020年，海底捞营业收入为286.14亿元，比2019年增长7.8%；年内溢利3.10亿元，比2019年下降86.8%?。海底捞在公告中表示，餐厅网络拓展是整体收入增长的主要驱动力。2020年海底捞营收的增长背后，是开店持续低效的大额投入。\n在股价和市值“疯狂”上涨背后，海底捞的泡沫也开始逐渐膨胀。\n疫情袭来，危机席卷了整个餐饮业。此时的海底捞并没有叫停原定的门店增开计划，而在市场需求紧缩背景下，短时间内大面积开店，不仅拉低了同区域其他门店的翻台率，新开分店本身大概率也难短期内盈利。同时，就海底捞本身规模来看，一二线城市餐饮需求最强大的区域在2020年及以前已经完成了覆盖。在深入一二线城市非中心领域和三四线城市过程中，海底捞有些过于着急。\n对于这样快速想要占领空白市场的巨头来说，今天资本市场的反应似乎说明了一切。\n02\n火锅还是服务\n当我们谈起海底捞，想起的第一个词是“火锅”还是“服务”？\n服务几乎成了海底捞的代名词。但海底捞主体业务所处的餐饮市场与服务业的规律却又大相径庭。\n火锅的市场规模可达万亿，海底捞的市场份额为6%，一方面，随着火锅业垂直赛道不断细分，除了海底捞，重庆火锅、潮汕牛肉火锅、牛蛙火锅也成为热门品类，另一方面，品牌数目的增多导致业内呈现多样化趋势，从火锅口味上很难以差异化优势取胜。\n纵观海底捞近几年的发展，火锅业背后，服务业的优势已然成为海底捞的第二级增长点，也是在扩张中保持领先的制胜法宝。“宾至如归”的服务为海底捞赢得了良好口碑，并保持着高于行业水准的用户粘性。\n\n▲图：海底捞官微\n然而，大规模扩张下沉市场带来了更多不同层次的客群用户，在提供服务过程中不可控性也增加了。今年5月，一则男子在海底捞内吃出蟑螂迅速上了头版头条，虽然最后被证明是男子自导自演的栽赃陷害，但一时不明真相的受众依然迅速将矛头直指海底捞，这也说明依托服务的海底捞，不得不随时面对外界时不时的“名誉挑战”。未来，面对更加多样化受众，如何去处理非典型客群，这也会为海底捞带来业绩之外的压力。\n另一方面，门店扩张也带来了管理难度的加大。过去海底捞优质化的餐饮服务已经成为了行业标杆，随着分店的开张，管理质量能否继续保持有待考究。网络上，抱怨“海底捞服务不如从前”的用户不在少数，想要继续保证服务水平和质量，海底捞不得不进一步加强管理上的投入。\n可以说，以服务为卖点始终只能锦上添花，扎实的产品质量才能保证企业的可持续发展。尤其是餐饮行业，做常青树本身已然十分困难，品牌层出不穷，大众的口味时刻也在变化，用服务吸引用户到店是海底捞的长板，但在火锅市场趋于饱和，疫情冲击大背景下，仅仅只有服务，不仅无法满足受众，资本也不会长期买单。\n03\n海底捞，何以捞\n估值腰斩，业绩下滑，海底捞的“双杀”困境如何解决？\n在疫情期间逆势扩张更像是海底捞在餐饮市场的一场豪赌。短线来看，开店确实影响了资金流和翻台率，让海底捞的“财报”没有那么好看，估值也颇受影响。但长期来看，在疫情复苏的大背景下，这也不失为一种长期策略。\n然而，比起资金投入带来的困境，品牌重新定位才是当代最紧要的。就目前现状来看，处于增长期的海底捞估值仍然在高位。彭博数据显示，1999～2007年是星巴克的高速增长时期，估值中枢为57倍。海底捞过去三年的估值中枢约为242倍，因此尽管市值腰斩，但这也只是让海底捞的市盈率回到了相对正常的高位。\n业界普遍认为，此次回调很可能是永久性的。海底捞已经过了快速扩张带来的红利期，在固有的经营模式下，翻台率回升和盈利能否回涨目前仍是未知数。而这也就意味着海底捞需要寻找第二增长曲线。\n\n▲图：海底捞官微\n另一方面，新的入局者也在给海底捞带来新的压力。哥老官、小龙坎、八合里等乘着网红经济走红的火锅店，也在不断对海底捞的霸主地位发起挑战，把目光放到更宽广的整个餐饮领域，各个餐饮品牌也在层出不穷的涌现。\n从现在海底捞呈交的答卷来看，关于海底捞的未来，外界并没有看出明确的答案。在食品安全，服务品质等被外界质疑的因素外，海底捞在擅长的服务领域也呈现出缓慢失势的状态，并且目前暂时也没有新的业务驱动其更快速的发展，未来能否持续增长也是外界颇为关注的焦点。\n想要持续坐稳餐饮第一股，并非想象中容易，除了必须要有过硬的产品和实力。如何调动起现行的餐饮矩阵，实现新的业绩增长正成为是海底捞的重中之重。","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":73,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[{"author":{"id":"3572046493348009","authorId":"3572046493348009","authorIdStr":"3572046493348009","name":"Savage_Never","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e8c5d3c6800ec12c32423a3100658845","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3572046493348009"},"content":"Do the task hey hey hey please praise please comment crab crab","text":"Do the task hey hey hey please praise please comment crab crab","html":"Do the task hey hey hey please praise please comment crab crab"}],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":165773442,"gmtCreate":1624159487686,"gmtModify":1703829780320,"author":{"id":"3557531278630339","authorId":"3557531278630339","authorIdStr":"3557531278630339","name":"Hannee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2a23162818c1e2b051d79f5521b6ee57","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3557531278630339"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"My view is increasing the interest end of theyear. Finance industry have more chances.&nbsp;not&nbsp;now!&nbsp;","listText":"My view is increasing the interest end of theyear. Finance industry have more chances.&nbsp;not&nbsp;now!&nbsp;","text":"My view is increasing the interest end of theyear. Finance industry have more chances. not now!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/165773442","repostId":"1130870510","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1130870510","pubTimestamp":1624154800,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1130870510?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-20 10:06","market":"us","language":"zh","title":"降息？那只是个美丽的误会","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1130870510","media":" 国元证券杨为敩","summary":"国元证券分析表示，在报价方式改变后，不同期限存款利率升降不一；当前环境下，货币政策宽松概率很低，若通胀下半年继续超预期，货币政策可能不松反紧。\n\n 编者注：此前券商中国报道称，多家银行向分行下发了调整","content":"<p>国元证券分析表示，在报价方式改变后，不同期限存款利率升降不一；当前环境下，货币政策宽松概率很低，若通胀下半年继续超预期，货币政策可能不松反紧。</p>\n<blockquote>\n 编者注：此前券商中国报道称，多家银行向分行下发了调整存款利率授权管理的通知。自律机制针对不同类型的银行设置了不同的基点上限。报价方式改变后，一年期以下的存款利率有所上升，一年期利率水平维持不变，一年期以上的存款产品大多要下调。有市场分析将其解读为变相降息。\n</blockquote>\n<p><b>1、市场利率定价自律机制实际上是在2015年央行存款利率幅度限制取消后，各个地方对利率上浮幅度进行软性限制而成立的自律机制。</b></p>\n<p><b>2、存款利率上限的界定方式由“基准利率*上浮比例”调整到“基准利率+上浮基点”，其初衷很可能是将存款利率上限与贷款利率上限的计量方式统一起来，监管层未必有通过该机制将利率朝一个方向引导的考虑。</b></p>\n<p><b>3、在报价方式改变之后，不同期限的存款利率也是升降不一的。对于大多数银行来说，1年期以上的存款利率会下降，而1年期以下的存款利率则会上升。</b></p>\n<p><b>4、理论上，这会增加银行资产端的久期，降低全社会的资金成本，但现实未必会表现尽如人意：</b></p>\n<p>1）总存款利率未必会因此而出现太大变化。在合理的范畴之内，银行的存款利率是由存款供需所导致的，其利率水平并非单纯打到上限，此外，如果银行理性的话，银行的存款利率与非存款负债渠道的成本（金融债及CDS）的比价关系也会约束存款利率过度脱离市场化轨道；</p>\n<p>2）即使存款利率发生变化，存款利率对资产端成本的传导也并不顺畅。银行在此前会通过一定限度内的期限错配去维持一个合适的净息差水平，而在该政策缩窄了银行长短期负债成本的利差的情况下，银行期限错配的意愿不可避免地会下降，这会导致全社会资金成本未必会因此而下降。</p>\n<p><b>5、在当前的环境之下，货币政策宽松的概率是很低的：</b></p>\n<p>1）当前货币政策的位置已经明显比经济基本面给出的合理位置更加宽松，至少并没有反映当前迅速向上的通胀水平，若通胀在下半年继续超预期的话，则货币政策在下半年可能不松反紧。</p>\n<p>2）当前的政策利率已经过低，在去年Q1疫情导致经济严重衰退之时，MLF、逆回购、LPR等政策工具利率水平各下调30bp之多，而在后续环境恢复之后，这些政策利率仍然维持在超低的水平之内，这导致继续动用价格政策的宽松并无必要。</p>\n<p><b>6、尤其是，这一政策未必会对利率债产生明显利好，如果银行资产端的久期不升反降的话，无论长端或短端的利率债收益率都不见得会出现明显下降，如果债券市场岿然不动的话，其他资产受该政策的影响也应相当有限。</b></p>","source":"highlight_wallstreetcn","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>降息？那只是个美丽的误会</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n降息？那只是个美丽的误会\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-06-20 10:06 北京时间&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://wallstreetcn.com/articles/3633334><strong> 国元证券杨为敩</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>国元证券分析表示，在报价方式改变后，不同期限存款利率升降不一；当前环境下，货币政策宽松概率很低，若通胀下半年继续超预期，货币政策可能不松反紧。\n\n 编者注：此前券商中国报道称，多家银行向分行下发了调整存款利率授权管理的通知。自律机制针对不同类型的银行设置了不同的基点上限。报价方式改变后，一年期以下的存款利率有所上升，一年期利率水平维持不变，一年期以上的存款产品大多要下调。有市场分析将其解读为变相...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://wallstreetcn.com/articles/3633334\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ab93f5b286e91abed33d5671db67c8b5","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://wallstreetcn.com/articles/3633334","is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/cc96873d3d23ee6ac10685520df9c100","article_id":"1130870510","content_text":"国元证券分析表示，在报价方式改变后，不同期限存款利率升降不一；当前环境下，货币政策宽松概率很低，若通胀下半年继续超预期，货币政策可能不松反紧。\n\n 编者注：此前券商中国报道称，多家银行向分行下发了调整存款利率授权管理的通知。自律机制针对不同类型的银行设置了不同的基点上限。报价方式改变后，一年期以下的存款利率有所上升，一年期利率水平维持不变，一年期以上的存款产品大多要下调。有市场分析将其解读为变相降息。\n\n1、市场利率定价自律机制实际上是在2015年央行存款利率幅度限制取消后，各个地方对利率上浮幅度进行软性限制而成立的自律机制。\n2、存款利率上限的界定方式由“基准利率*上浮比例”调整到“基准利率+上浮基点”，其初衷很可能是将存款利率上限与贷款利率上限的计量方式统一起来，监管层未必有通过该机制将利率朝一个方向引导的考虑。\n3、在报价方式改变之后，不同期限的存款利率也是升降不一的。对于大多数银行来说，1年期以上的存款利率会下降，而1年期以下的存款利率则会上升。\n4、理论上，这会增加银行资产端的久期，降低全社会的资金成本，但现实未必会表现尽如人意：\n1）总存款利率未必会因此而出现太大变化。在合理的范畴之内，银行的存款利率是由存款供需所导致的，其利率水平并非单纯打到上限，此外，如果银行理性的话，银行的存款利率与非存款负债渠道的成本（金融债及CDS）的比价关系也会约束存款利率过度脱离市场化轨道；\n2）即使存款利率发生变化，存款利率对资产端成本的传导也并不顺畅。银行在此前会通过一定限度内的期限错配去维持一个合适的净息差水平，而在该政策缩窄了银行长短期负债成本的利差的情况下，银行期限错配的意愿不可避免地会下降，这会导致全社会资金成本未必会因此而下降。\n5、在当前的环境之下，货币政策宽松的概率是很低的：\n1）当前货币政策的位置已经明显比经济基本面给出的合理位置更加宽松，至少并没有反映当前迅速向上的通胀水平，若通胀在下半年继续超预期的话，则货币政策在下半年可能不松反紧。\n2）当前的政策利率已经过低，在去年Q1疫情导致经济严重衰退之时，MLF、逆回购、LPR等政策工具利率水平各下调30bp之多，而在后续环境恢复之后，这些政策利率仍然维持在超低的水平之内，这导致继续动用价格政策的宽松并无必要。\n6、尤其是，这一政策未必会对利率债产生明显利好，如果银行资产端的久期不升反降的话，无论长端或短端的利率债收益率都不见得会出现明显下降，如果债券市场岿然不动的话，其他资产受该政策的影响也应相当有限。","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":21,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":176675916,"gmtCreate":1626883193735,"gmtModify":1703479980595,"author":{"id":"3557531278630339","authorId":"3557531278630339","authorIdStr":"3557531278630339","name":"Hannee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2a23162818c1e2b051d79f5521b6ee57","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3557531278630339"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/C6L.SI\">$SINGAPORE AIRLINES LTD(C6L.SI)$</a>This will drop more as positive&nbsp;cases increasing now!&nbsp;","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/C6L.SI\">$SINGAPORE AIRLINES LTD(C6L.SI)$</a>This will drop more as positive&nbsp;cases increasing now!&nbsp;","text":"$SINGAPORE AIRLINES LTD(C6L.SI)$This will drop more as positive cases increasing now!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/176675916","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1107,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[{"author":{"id":"3571134598140592","authorId":"3571134598140592","authorIdStr":"3571134598140592","name":"DaddyBili","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/7473fb92a37534d1fd8b9979bb1800f4","crmLevel":7,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"idStr":"3571134598140592"},"content":"Haha it wont fall below $4.8","text":"Haha it wont fall below $4.8","html":"Haha it wont fall below $4.8"}],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":891375273,"gmtCreate":1628343685892,"gmtModify":1703505253567,"author":{"id":"3557531278630339","authorId":"3557531278630339","authorIdStr":"3557531278630339","name":"Hannee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2a23162818c1e2b051d79f5521b6ee57","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3557531278630339"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/D05.SI\">$DBS GROUP HOLDINGS LTD(D05.SI)$</a>Strong buy due to dividend declare high. May beit us time to sell after up so much this few days!&nbsp;","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/D05.SI\">$DBS GROUP HOLDINGS LTD(D05.SI)$</a>Strong buy due to dividend declare high. May beit us time to sell after up so much this few days!&nbsp;","text":"$DBS GROUP HOLDINGS LTD(D05.SI)$Strong buy due to dividend declare high. May beit us time to sell after up so much this few days!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":8,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/891375273","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":312,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":125845639,"gmtCreate":1624669318621,"gmtModify":1703843151535,"author":{"id":"3557531278630339","authorId":"3557531278630339","authorIdStr":"3557531278630339","name":"Hannee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2a23162818c1e2b051d79f5521b6ee57","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3557531278630339"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Sp500 is good indicator for stock rising.&nbsp;","listText":"Sp500 is good indicator for stock rising.&nbsp;","text":"Sp500 is good indicator for stock rising.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/125845639","repostId":"1177764085","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1177764085","pubTimestamp":1624662146,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1177764085?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-26 07:02","market":"us","language":"en","title":"S&P 500 climbs to another record led by bank shares, notches its best week since February","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1177764085","media":"CNBC","summary":"U.S. stocks rose on Friday with the S&P 500 building on its rally to records, as investors bet that ","content":"<div>\n<p>U.S. stocks rose on Friday with the S&P 500 building on its rally to records, as investors bet that higher inflation will be temporary as the economy continues to recover from the pandemic.\nThe broad ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/06/24/stock-market-futures-open-to-close-.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"cnbc_highlight","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>S&P 500 climbs to another record led by bank shares, notches its best week since February</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nS&P 500 climbs to another record led by bank shares, notches its best week since February\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-06-26 07:02 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.cnbc.com/2021/06/24/stock-market-futures-open-to-close-.html><strong>CNBC</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>U.S. stocks rose on Friday with the S&P 500 building on its rally to records, as investors bet that higher inflation will be temporary as the economy continues to recover from the pandemic.\nThe broad ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/06/24/stock-market-futures-open-to-close-.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index"},"source_url":"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/06/24/stock-market-futures-open-to-close-.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/72bb72e1b84c09fca865c6dcb1bbcd16","article_id":"1177764085","content_text":"U.S. stocks rose on Friday with the S&P 500 building on its rally to records, as investors bet that higher inflation will be temporary as the economy continues to recover from the pandemic.\nThe broad equity benchmark climbed 0.3% to hit another closing record high of 4,280.70. Financials were the best-performing S&P 500 sector with a 1.3% gain. The Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 237.02 points, or 0.7%, to 34,433.84, sitting less than 2% from its record. The Nasdaq Composite erased earlier gains and closed 0.1% lower at 14,360.39 amid a rise in bond yields. The 10-year Treasury yield jumped 4 basis points to 1.52%.\nThe S&P 500 rallied 2.7% for the week, notching its biggest weekly gain since early February. The Dow gained 3.4% this week for its best week since mid-March, while the Nasdaq advanced 2.4%.\nFriday’s rally came after a key inflation indicator that the Federal Reserve uses to set policy rose 3.4% in May, the fastest increase since the early 1990s, the Commerce Department reported Friday. The reading matched the expectation from economists polled by Dow Jones. The core index rose 0.5% for the month, which actually was below the 0.6% estimate.\nThe core personal consumption expenditures price index increase reflects the rapid pace of economic expansion and resulting price pressures, and amplified how far the nation has come since the pandemic-induced shutdown of 2020.\n“This provided support to the Fed’s argument that inflation is transitory and will help allay fears that we are witnessing runaway inflation,” said Anu Gaggar, senior global Investment analyst at Commonwealth Financial Network. “This should continue to provide support to risk assets such as equities.”\nBank shares jumped after the Federal Reserve announced the banking industry could easily withstand a severe recession. The Fed, in releasing the results of its annual stress test, said the 23 institutions in the 2021 exam remained “well above” minimum required capital levels during a hypothetical economic downturn. The decision cleared the way for the banks to raise dividends and buy back more stock, which was suspended during the pandemic.\nWells Fargo climbed 2.6%, while Fifth Third and PNC all gained over 2%. JPMorgan and Bank of America both rose more than 1%.\nNike’s stock surged 15.5%, helping to boost sentiment for the Dow. The company reported earnings and revenue that blew past Wall Street estimates. Digital sales also jumped 41% since last year and 147% from two years ago.\nOn the flipside,FedEx dipped 3.6% despite beating on the top and bottom lines of its earnings. FedEx also gave a strong yearly outlook.\nFriday saw heightened trading volume as FTSE Russell was set to rebalance its U.S. stock indexes at the market close. Bank of America estimated that more than $170 billion worth of shares would be changed hands as a result of 625 changes in total to Russell indexes, including the Russell 1000 and Russell 2000.\nPresident Joe Biden announced Thursday that the White House struck an infrastructure deal with a bipartisan group of senators. The lawmakers have worked for weeks to craft a roughly $1 trillion package that could get through Congress with support from both parties. The framework will include $579 billion in new spending on transportation like roads, bridges and rail, electric vehicle infrastructure and electric transit, among other things.\nThe stock market came back from last week’s swoon induced by worries about a tighter Federal Reserve. Last week, the Dow fell 3.5% and the S&P 500 shed 1.9% as the Fed moved up its timeline for interest-rate increases.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":66,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":184409558,"gmtCreate":1623720345674,"gmtModify":1704209478196,"author":{"id":"3557531278630339","authorId":"3557531278630339","authorIdStr":"3557531278630339","name":"Hannee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2a23162818c1e2b051d79f5521b6ee57","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3557531278630339"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"What reason this stock up so much?","listText":"What reason this stock up so much?","text":"What reason this stock up so much?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/184409558","repostId":"1152475049","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1152475049","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"为用户提供金融资讯、行情、数据，旨在帮助投资者理解世界，做投资决策。","home_visible":1,"media_name":"老虎资讯综合","id":"102","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1623720093,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1152475049?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-15 09:21","market":"hk","language":"zh","title":"开盘：恒指高开0.36%，区块链概念股大涨","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1152475049","media":"老虎资讯综合","summary":"6月15日讯，港股三大指数高开，恒指涨0.36%报28842点，国指涨0.32%报10784点，恒生科技指数涨0.57%报8036点。盘面上，体育用品股强势，特步大幅高开近15%，获高瓴投资5亿港元，","content":"<p>6月15日讯，港股三大指数高开，恒指涨0.36%报28842点，国指涨0.32%报10784点，恒生科技指数涨0.57%报8036点。<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/90276182e30f383cf17ccda84f2625dd\" tg-width=\"840\" tg-height=\"470\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">盘面上，体育用品股强势，特步大幅高开近15%，获高瓴投资5亿港元，安踏涨1.7%；电力股、光伏股、乳业股、教育股普遍上涨，<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/02688\">新奥能源</a>高开逾4%创历史新高；大型科技股普涨，<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NTES\">网易</a>大涨逾4%，<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BABA\">阿里巴巴</a>涨超2%，<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/00700\">腾讯</a>涨1.5%；医药股涨跌不一，<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/600196\">复星医药</a>低开2%，<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/02186\">绿叶制药</a>高开1.62%；烟草概念股、黄金股、中资券商股普跌。</p>\n<p>区块链概念股高开，<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/01611\">火币科技</a>高开13.33%，<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/01499\">欧科云链</a>高开11.11%，<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/01647\">雄岸科技</a>高开逾4%。比特币周一再次迈过40000美元，达到两周多以来最高水平。这种全球最大加密货币周一连续第二天上扬，盘中最高涨3.9%，至40795美元左右。上周五以来，比特币已累计上涨约9%。跟踪主要加密货币的彭博Galaxy加密货币指数一度上涨7.7%。此前马斯克称，在确认矿工使用合理比例的清洁能源(约50%)，且未来趋势向好时，<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">特斯拉</a>将会恢复比特币交易。特斯拉此前仅出售了10%的比特币持仓，是为了测试比特币的流动性，确认能够在不扰动市场的情况下轻松地结算。</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/01368\">特步国际</a>高开近15%，获高瓴资本认购6500万美元零息永续可转债。</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>开盘：恒指高开0.36%，区块链概念股大涨</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n开盘：恒指高开0.36%，区块链概念股大涨\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/102\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">老虎资讯综合 </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-06-15 09:21</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>6月15日讯，港股三大指数高开，恒指涨0.36%报28842点，国指涨0.32%报10784点，恒生科技指数涨0.57%报8036点。<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/90276182e30f383cf17ccda84f2625dd\" tg-width=\"840\" tg-height=\"470\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">盘面上，体育用品股强势，特步大幅高开近15%，获高瓴投资5亿港元，安踏涨1.7%；电力股、光伏股、乳业股、教育股普遍上涨，<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/02688\">新奥能源</a>高开逾4%创历史新高；大型科技股普涨，<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NTES\">网易</a>大涨逾4%，<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BABA\">阿里巴巴</a>涨超2%，<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/00700\">腾讯</a>涨1.5%；医药股涨跌不一，<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/600196\">复星医药</a>低开2%，<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/02186\">绿叶制药</a>高开1.62%；烟草概念股、黄金股、中资券商股普跌。</p>\n<p>区块链概念股高开，<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/01611\">火币科技</a>高开13.33%，<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/01499\">欧科云链</a>高开11.11%，<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/01647\">雄岸科技</a>高开逾4%。比特币周一再次迈过40000美元，达到两周多以来最高水平。这种全球最大加密货币周一连续第二天上扬，盘中最高涨3.9%，至40795美元左右。上周五以来，比特币已累计上涨约9%。跟踪主要加密货币的彭博Galaxy加密货币指数一度上涨7.7%。此前马斯克称，在确认矿工使用合理比例的清洁能源(约50%)，且未来趋势向好时，<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">特斯拉</a>将会恢复比特币交易。特斯拉此前仅出售了10%的比特币持仓，是为了测试比特币的流动性，确认能够在不扰动市场的情况下轻松地结算。</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/01368\">特步国际</a>高开近15%，获高瓴资本认购6500万美元零息永续可转债。</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5b3b5e72649367d0aafd9bcbbca9bcd1","relate_stocks":{"513600":"恒生指数ETF","02833":"恒指ETF","HSI":"恒生指数"},"is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1152475049","content_text":"6月15日讯，港股三大指数高开，恒指涨0.36%报28842点，国指涨0.32%报10784点，恒生科技指数涨0.57%报8036点。盘面上，体育用品股强势，特步大幅高开近15%，获高瓴投资5亿港元，安踏涨1.7%；电力股、光伏股、乳业股、教育股普遍上涨，新奥能源高开逾4%创历史新高；大型科技股普涨，网易大涨逾4%，阿里巴巴涨超2%，腾讯涨1.5%；医药股涨跌不一，复星医药低开2%，绿叶制药高开1.62%；烟草概念股、黄金股、中资券商股普跌。\n区块链概念股高开，火币科技高开13.33%，欧科云链高开11.11%，雄岸科技高开逾4%。比特币周一再次迈过40000美元，达到两周多以来最高水平。这种全球最大加密货币周一连续第二天上扬，盘中最高涨3.9%，至40795美元左右。上周五以来，比特币已累计上涨约9%。跟踪主要加密货币的彭博Galaxy加密货币指数一度上涨7.7%。此前马斯克称，在确认矿工使用合理比例的清洁能源(约50%)，且未来趋势向好时，特斯拉将会恢复比特币交易。特斯拉此前仅出售了10%的比特币持仓，是为了测试比特币的流动性，确认能够在不扰动市场的情况下轻松地结算。\n特步国际高开近15%，获高瓴资本认购6500万美元零息永续可转债。","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":4,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":808969506,"gmtCreate":1627551593905,"gmtModify":1703492185211,"author":{"id":"3557531278630339","authorId":"3557531278630339","authorIdStr":"3557531278630339","name":"Hannee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2a23162818c1e2b051d79f5521b6ee57","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3557531278630339"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/D05.SI\">$DBS GROUP HOLDINGS LTD(D05.SI)$</a>With the lifted of dividend payout, it is certainlyattract more investor. If can hit above last&nbsp;resistance of 30.80. Should be next TOP.&nbsp;&nbsp;","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/D05.SI\">$DBS GROUP HOLDINGS LTD(D05.SI)$</a>With the lifted of dividend payout, it is certainlyattract more investor. If can hit above last&nbsp;resistance of 30.80. Should be next TOP.&nbsp;&nbsp;","text":"$DBS GROUP HOLDINGS LTD(D05.SI)$With the lifted of dividend payout, it is certainlyattract more investor. If can hit above last resistance of 30.80. Should be next TOP.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/808969506","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":606,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":152260037,"gmtCreate":1625297513329,"gmtModify":1703740188623,"author":{"id":"3557531278630339","authorId":"3557531278630339","authorIdStr":"3557531278630339","name":"Hannee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2a23162818c1e2b051d79f5521b6ee57","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3557531278630339"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[Happy]&nbsp;","listText":"[Happy]&nbsp;","text":"[Happy]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":8,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/152260037","repostId":"1136694264","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1136694264","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Stock Market Quotes, Business News, Financial News, Trading Ideas, and Stock Research by Professionals","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Benzinga","id":"1052270027","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa"},"pubTimestamp":1625293431,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1136694264?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-03 14:23","market":"us","language":"en","title":"AMC Options Traders Aren't Discouraged, Repeatedly Hammer Calls","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1136694264","media":"Benzinga","summary":"On Friday morning, Iceberg Researchannouncedit had taken a short position inAMC Entertainment Holdin","content":"<p>On Friday morning, Iceberg Researchannouncedit had taken a short position in<b>AMC Entertainment Holdings</b>AMC 4.08%. Iceberg said options traders have lost money due to the stock trading sideways for the month of June and that the pump around the stock looks shaky.</p>\n<p>The news didn’t stop institutions from continuously hammering AMC call contracts and on Friday options traders had purchased over $2.59 million worth. The expiration dates for the contracts ranged from today up until Dec. 17 and a few traders chose a strike price of a whopping $145.</p>\n<p>AMC’s stock broke bearishly from a symmetrical triangle it had formed through its sideways trading on Friday, but held a support level at $47.91 and bounced from it. Bulls would like to see the dip continue to be bought and for AMC to end the day by printing a hammer candlestick and closing above the 21-day exponential moving average.</p>\n<p><b>Why It’s Important:</b>When a sweep order occurs, it indicates the trader wanted to get into a position quickly and is anticipating an imminent large move in stock price. A sweeper pays market price for the call or put option instead of placing a bid, which sweeps the order book of multiple exchanges to fill the order immediately.</p>\n<p>These types of call option orders are usually made by institutions, and retail investors can find watching for sweepers useful because it indicates “smart money” has entered into a position.</p>\n<p><b>The AMC Option Trades:</b>Below is a look at the notable options alerts, courtesy ofBenzinga Pro:</p>\n<ul>\n <li>At 9:42 a.m., Friday a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 265 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $59 expiring on July 9. The trade represented a $52,205 bullish bet for which the trader paid $1.97 per option contract.</li>\n <li>At 9:51 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 247 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $65 expiring on Aug. 20. The trade represented a $221,065 bullish bet for which the trader paid $8.95 per option contract.</li>\n <li>At 9:52 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 248 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $120 expiring on Dec. 17. The trade represented a $260,400 bullish bet for which the trader paid $10.50 per option contract.</li>\n <li>At 9:53 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 356 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $65 expiring on Aug. 20. The trade represented a $311,500 bullish bet for which the trader paid $8.75 per option contract.</li>\n <li>At 9:53 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 310 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $65 expiring on Aug. 20. The trade represented a $266,600 bullish bet for which the trader paid $8.60 per option contract.</li>\n <li>At 9:56 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 310 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $65 expiring on Aug. 20. The trade represented a $266,600 bullish bet for which the trader paid $8.60 per option contract.</li>\n <li>At 9:57 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 300 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $28 expiring on July 2. The trade represented a $221,065 bullish bet for which the trader paid $23.40 per option contract.</li>\n <li>At 9:58 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 289 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $120 expiring on Dec., 17. The trade represented a $303,450 bullish bet for which the trader paid $10.50 per option contract.</li>\n <li>At 9:58 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 580 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $55 expiring on July 16. The trade represented a $278,400 bullish bet for which the trader paid $4.80 per option contract.</li>\n <li>At 10:07 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 258 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $80 expiring on July 16. The trade represented a $39,216 bullish bet for which the trader paid $1.52 per option contract.</li>\n <li>At 10:24 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 352 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $50 expiring on July 2. The trade represented a $54,560 bullish bet for which the trader paid $1.55 per option contract.</li>\n <li>At 10:26 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 234 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $145 expiring on July 23. The trade represented a $39,216 bullish bet for which the trader paid $1.31 per option contract.</li>\n <li>At 10:31 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 224 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $145 expiring on Sept. 17. The trade represented a $105,280 bullish bet for which the trader paid $4.70 per option contract.</li>\n <li>At 10:38 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 500 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $47 expiring on July 2. The trade represented a $146,000 bullish bet for which the trader paid $2.92 per option contract.</li>\n <li>At 12:02 p.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 500 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $45 expiring on July 9. The trade represented a $305,000 bullish bet for which the trader paid $6.10 per option contract.</li>\n</ul>\n<p><b>AMC Price Action:</b>Shares of AMC Entertainment were trading down 5.3% to $51.33 at publication time.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>AMC Options Traders Aren't Discouraged, Repeatedly Hammer Calls</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAMC Options Traders Aren't Discouraged, Repeatedly Hammer Calls\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Benzinga </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-07-03 14:23</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>On Friday morning, Iceberg Researchannouncedit had taken a short position in<b>AMC Entertainment Holdings</b>AMC 4.08%. Iceberg said options traders have lost money due to the stock trading sideways for the month of June and that the pump around the stock looks shaky.</p>\n<p>The news didn’t stop institutions from continuously hammering AMC call contracts and on Friday options traders had purchased over $2.59 million worth. The expiration dates for the contracts ranged from today up until Dec. 17 and a few traders chose a strike price of a whopping $145.</p>\n<p>AMC’s stock broke bearishly from a symmetrical triangle it had formed through its sideways trading on Friday, but held a support level at $47.91 and bounced from it. Bulls would like to see the dip continue to be bought and for AMC to end the day by printing a hammer candlestick and closing above the 21-day exponential moving average.</p>\n<p><b>Why It’s Important:</b>When a sweep order occurs, it indicates the trader wanted to get into a position quickly and is anticipating an imminent large move in stock price. A sweeper pays market price for the call or put option instead of placing a bid, which sweeps the order book of multiple exchanges to fill the order immediately.</p>\n<p>These types of call option orders are usually made by institutions, and retail investors can find watching for sweepers useful because it indicates “smart money” has entered into a position.</p>\n<p><b>The AMC Option Trades:</b>Below is a look at the notable options alerts, courtesy ofBenzinga Pro:</p>\n<ul>\n <li>At 9:42 a.m., Friday a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 265 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $59 expiring on July 9. The trade represented a $52,205 bullish bet for which the trader paid $1.97 per option contract.</li>\n <li>At 9:51 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 247 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $65 expiring on Aug. 20. The trade represented a $221,065 bullish bet for which the trader paid $8.95 per option contract.</li>\n <li>At 9:52 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 248 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $120 expiring on Dec. 17. The trade represented a $260,400 bullish bet for which the trader paid $10.50 per option contract.</li>\n <li>At 9:53 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 356 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $65 expiring on Aug. 20. The trade represented a $311,500 bullish bet for which the trader paid $8.75 per option contract.</li>\n <li>At 9:53 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 310 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $65 expiring on Aug. 20. The trade represented a $266,600 bullish bet for which the trader paid $8.60 per option contract.</li>\n <li>At 9:56 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 310 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $65 expiring on Aug. 20. The trade represented a $266,600 bullish bet for which the trader paid $8.60 per option contract.</li>\n <li>At 9:57 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 300 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $28 expiring on July 2. The trade represented a $221,065 bullish bet for which the trader paid $23.40 per option contract.</li>\n <li>At 9:58 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 289 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $120 expiring on Dec., 17. The trade represented a $303,450 bullish bet for which the trader paid $10.50 per option contract.</li>\n <li>At 9:58 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 580 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $55 expiring on July 16. The trade represented a $278,400 bullish bet for which the trader paid $4.80 per option contract.</li>\n <li>At 10:07 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 258 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $80 expiring on July 16. The trade represented a $39,216 bullish bet for which the trader paid $1.52 per option contract.</li>\n <li>At 10:24 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 352 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $50 expiring on July 2. The trade represented a $54,560 bullish bet for which the trader paid $1.55 per option contract.</li>\n <li>At 10:26 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 234 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $145 expiring on July 23. The trade represented a $39,216 bullish bet for which the trader paid $1.31 per option contract.</li>\n <li>At 10:31 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 224 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $145 expiring on Sept. 17. The trade represented a $105,280 bullish bet for which the trader paid $4.70 per option contract.</li>\n <li>At 10:38 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 500 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $47 expiring on July 2. The trade represented a $146,000 bullish bet for which the trader paid $2.92 per option contract.</li>\n <li>At 12:02 p.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 500 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $45 expiring on July 9. The trade represented a $305,000 bullish bet for which the trader paid $6.10 per option contract.</li>\n</ul>\n<p><b>AMC Price Action:</b>Shares of AMC Entertainment were trading down 5.3% to $51.33 at publication time.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AMC":"AMC院线"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1136694264","content_text":"On Friday morning, Iceberg Researchannouncedit had taken a short position inAMC Entertainment HoldingsAMC 4.08%. Iceberg said options traders have lost money due to the stock trading sideways for the month of June and that the pump around the stock looks shaky.\nThe news didn’t stop institutions from continuously hammering AMC call contracts and on Friday options traders had purchased over $2.59 million worth. The expiration dates for the contracts ranged from today up until Dec. 17 and a few traders chose a strike price of a whopping $145.\nAMC’s stock broke bearishly from a symmetrical triangle it had formed through its sideways trading on Friday, but held a support level at $47.91 and bounced from it. Bulls would like to see the dip continue to be bought and for AMC to end the day by printing a hammer candlestick and closing above the 21-day exponential moving average.\nWhy It’s Important:When a sweep order occurs, it indicates the trader wanted to get into a position quickly and is anticipating an imminent large move in stock price. A sweeper pays market price for the call or put option instead of placing a bid, which sweeps the order book of multiple exchanges to fill the order immediately.\nThese types of call option orders are usually made by institutions, and retail investors can find watching for sweepers useful because it indicates “smart money” has entered into a position.\nThe AMC Option Trades:Below is a look at the notable options alerts, courtesy ofBenzinga Pro:\n\nAt 9:42 a.m., Friday a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 265 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $59 expiring on July 9. The trade represented a $52,205 bullish bet for which the trader paid $1.97 per option contract.\nAt 9:51 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 247 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $65 expiring on Aug. 20. The trade represented a $221,065 bullish bet for which the trader paid $8.95 per option contract.\nAt 9:52 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 248 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $120 expiring on Dec. 17. The trade represented a $260,400 bullish bet for which the trader paid $10.50 per option contract.\nAt 9:53 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 356 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $65 expiring on Aug. 20. The trade represented a $311,500 bullish bet for which the trader paid $8.75 per option contract.\nAt 9:53 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 310 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $65 expiring on Aug. 20. The trade represented a $266,600 bullish bet for which the trader paid $8.60 per option contract.\nAt 9:56 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 310 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $65 expiring on Aug. 20. The trade represented a $266,600 bullish bet for which the trader paid $8.60 per option contract.\nAt 9:57 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 300 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $28 expiring on July 2. The trade represented a $221,065 bullish bet for which the trader paid $23.40 per option contract.\nAt 9:58 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 289 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $120 expiring on Dec., 17. The trade represented a $303,450 bullish bet for which the trader paid $10.50 per option contract.\nAt 9:58 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 580 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $55 expiring on July 16. The trade represented a $278,400 bullish bet for which the trader paid $4.80 per option contract.\nAt 10:07 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 258 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $80 expiring on July 16. The trade represented a $39,216 bullish bet for which the trader paid $1.52 per option contract.\nAt 10:24 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 352 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $50 expiring on July 2. The trade represented a $54,560 bullish bet for which the trader paid $1.55 per option contract.\nAt 10:26 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 234 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $145 expiring on July 23. The trade represented a $39,216 bullish bet for which the trader paid $1.31 per option contract.\nAt 10:31 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 224 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $145 expiring on Sept. 17. The trade represented a $105,280 bullish bet for which the trader paid $4.70 per option contract.\nAt 10:38 a.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 500 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $47 expiring on July 2. The trade represented a $146,000 bullish bet for which the trader paid $2.92 per option contract.\nAt 12:02 p.m., a trader executed a call sweep near the bid of 500 AMC Entertainment options with a strike price of $45 expiring on July 9. The trade represented a $305,000 bullish bet for which the trader paid $6.10 per option contract.\n\nAMC Price Action:Shares of AMC Entertainment were trading down 5.3% to $51.33 at publication time.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":23,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":880003492,"gmtCreate":1630994570116,"gmtModify":1676530437605,"author":{"id":"3557531278630339","authorId":"3557531278630339","authorIdStr":"3557531278630339","name":"Hannee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2a23162818c1e2b051d79f5521b6ee57","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3557531278630339"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/00700\">$TENCENT(00700)$</a>520 obviously is resistance to up further, as previously there is a big gap. If hit 520 above, next level would be 580. [Smile]&nbsp;[Happy]&nbsp;","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/00700\">$TENCENT(00700)$</a>520 obviously is resistance to up further, as previously there is a big gap. If hit 520 above, next level would be 580. [Smile]&nbsp;[Happy]&nbsp;","text":"$TENCENT(00700)$520 obviously is resistance to up further, as previously there is a big gap. If hit 520 above, next level would be 580. [Smile] [Happy]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/880003492","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":563,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[{"author":{"id":"3578029344203599","authorId":"3578029344203599","authorIdStr":"3578029344203599","name":"relx分销者","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7eaa979376989e28bb9e6c34d588258a","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3578029344203599"},"content":"As long as Tencent continues to buy back, what is 520? If it doesn't buy back, it will face a callback of one to two weeks, to about 480","text":"As long as Tencent continues to buy back, what is 520? If it doesn't buy back, it will face a callback of one to two weeks, to about 480","html":"As long as Tencent continues to buy back, what is 520? If it doesn't buy back, it will face a callback of one to two weeks, to about 480"}],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":129024938,"gmtCreate":1624346233424,"gmtModify":1703834058673,"author":{"id":"3557531278630339","authorId":"3557531278630339","authorIdStr":"3557531278630339","name":"Hannee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2a23162818c1e2b051d79f5521b6ee57","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3557531278630339"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Why hdl drooped so&nbsp;much? China unlocked now. Consuming should boost up!&nbsp;","listText":"Why hdl drooped so&nbsp;much? China unlocked now. Consuming should boost up!&nbsp;","text":"Why hdl drooped so much? China unlocked now. Consuming should boost up!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/129024938","repostId":"2145185037","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2145185037","pubTimestamp":1624344564,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2145185037?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-22 14:49","market":"hk","language":"zh","title":"海底捞跌入海底","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2145185037","media":"观察者网","summary":"6月21日，#海底捞市值蒸发超2400亿港元#登上微博热搜，继上周市值跌破2000亿港元之后，海底捞今日股价再度跌超5%，四个月市值跌超2500亿港元。往前追溯一周，6月15日，开盘后的海底捞股价大跌","content":"<p>6月21日，#<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/06862\">海底捞</a>市值蒸发超2400亿港元#登上<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/WB\">微博</a>热搜，继上周市值跌破2000亿港元之后，海底捞今日股价再度跌超5%，四个月市值跌超2500亿港元。往前追溯一周，6月15日，开盘后的海底捞股价大跌近7%，至37.05港元，创出新低，盘中最低跌至1964亿港元。</p>\n<p>二级市场“败退”背后，是海底捞步步下跌的翻台率。根据海底捞年报数据显示，2019年海底捞餐厅一线和二线城市的翻台率分别为4.7/4.9次/天，较2018年5.1/5.3次/天均下降0.4次/天。2020年，海底捞餐厅整体翻台率为3.5次/天；2021年5月初，公司内部人士曾向券商透露4月份餐厅翻台率不到3次/天。这意味着，在餐饮行业大复苏的背景下，海底捞的翻台率却一直在下降。</p>\n<p>根据 <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/002736\">国信证券</a> 的测算，海底捞单店守住盈亏的平衡线为翻台率3次/天。因此，跌破3次/天也表示海底捞单店处于亏损或者微利状态。</p>\n<p>凭借着24小时营业和多业态服务的经营模式，海底捞迅速填补了中国夜生活市场的空缺，并制造属于海底捞自己的火锅业服务标准。在新消费趋势下获得许多食客好评，这也让海底捞有底气持续扩张，加快分店开设速度。</p>\n<p>然而，随着海底捞2020年财报的发布，外界也进一步窥探到这家火锅巨企在疫情之下的阵面，其市值更是从巅峰时期的4500亿港元跌至今日的不到2000亿港元。</p>\n<p>市值跌超2500亿港元背后，我们应该如何看待这样一家企业？</p>\n<p>01</p>\n<p>海底泡沫有多大</p>\n<p>市值跌下神坛的海底捞无疑正在经历着前所未有的至暗时刻。</p>\n<p>4500亿港元的故事是资本市场对于海底捞的估价，但这真的“名副其实”吗？从股价增长来看，在疫情大面积影响餐饮业情况下，海底捞确实实现了逆势增长，增长背后是二级市场的看好，同时也意味着对海底捞门店快速扩张的肯定，毕竟开店数量的增加往往意味着总营收的增加。门店数目越多，规模效应就越明显。</p>\n<p>数据显示，截至2020年年底，海底捞餐厅数为1298家，相比上年同期的768家增加了530家。其中1205家位于中国大陆，93家位于中国大陆以外14个国家和地区。</p>\n<p>2017年～2019年，是海底捞的“黄金时代”。这些年海底捞的门店数量以41%的年复合增长率进行扩张，整体餐厅翻台率始终保持高位，达到平均4.9次/天。翻台率的坚挺是营收和利润持续增长的最强保障，2019年业绩报告显示，海底捞全年实现收入265.56亿元，同比增长了56.5%，净利润23.47亿元，同比增长42.3%。</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/004059ef41e3cf25796f959fd6f3218b\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"310\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>▲图：海底捞官微</p>\n<p>从2019年即以前海底捞的扩张速度来看，即便是处于高速增长，利润和翻台率依旧没有下跌。而到了2020年，海底捞营业收入为286.14亿元，比2019年增长7.8%；年内溢利3.10亿元，比2019年下降86.8%?。海底捞在公告中表示，餐厅网络拓展是整体收入增长的主要驱动力。2020年海底捞营收的增长背后，是开店持续低效的大额投入。</p>\n<p>在股价和市值“疯狂”上涨背后，海底捞的泡沫也开始逐渐膨胀。</p>\n<p>疫情袭来，危机席卷了整个餐饮业。此时的海底捞并没有叫停原定的门店增开计划，而在市场需求紧缩背景下，短时间内大面积开店，不仅拉低了同区域其他门店的翻台率，新开分店本身大概率也难短期内盈利。同时，就海底捞本身规模来看，一二线城市餐饮需求最强大的区域在2020年及以前已经完成了覆盖。在深入一二线城市非中心领域和三四线城市过程中，海底捞有些过于着急。</p>\n<p>对于这样快速想要占领空白市场的巨头来说，今天资本市场的反应似乎说明了一切。</p>\n<p>02</p>\n<p>火锅还是服务</p>\n<p>当我们谈起海底捞，想起的第一个词是“火锅”还是“服务”？</p>\n<p>服务几乎成了海底捞的代名词。但海底捞主体业务所处的餐饮市场与服务业的规律却又大相径庭。</p>\n<p>火锅的市场规模可达万亿，海底捞的市场份额为6%，一方面，随着火锅业垂直赛道不断细分，除了海底捞，重庆火锅、潮汕牛肉火锅、牛蛙火锅也成为热门品类，另一方面，品牌数目的增多导致业内呈现多样化趋势，从火锅口味上很难以差异化优势取胜。</p>\n<p>纵观海底捞近几年的发展，火锅业背后，服务业的优势已然成为海底捞的第二级增长点，也是在扩张中保持领先的制胜法宝。“宾至如归”的服务为海底捞赢得了良好口碑，并保持着高于行业水准的用户粘性。</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/abb02eb79735a38b3a6201da9e9d0030\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"333\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>▲图：海底捞官微</p>\n<p>然而，大规模扩张下沉市场带来了更多不同层次的客群用户，在提供服务过程中不可控性也增加了。今年5月，一则男子在海底捞内吃出蟑螂迅速上了头版头条，虽然最后被证明是男子自导自演的栽赃陷害，但一时不明真相的受众依然迅速将矛头直指海底捞，这也说明依托服务的海底捞，不得不随时面对外界时不时的“名誉挑战”。未来，面对更加多样化受众，如何去处理非典型客群，这也会为海底捞带来业绩之外的压力。</p>\n<p>另一方面，门店扩张也带来了管理难度的加大。过去海底捞优质化的餐饮服务已经成为了行业标杆，随着分店的开张，管理质量能否继续保持有待考究。网络上，抱怨“海底捞服务不如从前”的用户不在少数，想要继续保证服务水平和质量，海底捞不得不进一步加强管理上的投入。</p>\n<p>可以说，以服务为卖点始终只能锦上添花，扎实的产品质量才能保证企业的可持续发展。尤其是餐饮行业，做常青树本身已然十分困难，品牌层出不穷，大众的口味时刻也在变化，用服务吸引用户到店是海底捞的长板，但在火锅市场趋于饱和，疫情冲击大背景下，仅仅只有服务，不仅无法满足受众，资本也不会长期买单。</p>\n<p>03</p>\n<p>海底捞，何以捞</p>\n<p>估值腰斩，业绩下滑，海底捞的“双杀”困境如何解决？</p>\n<p>在疫情期间逆势扩张更像是海底捞在餐饮市场的一场豪赌。短线来看，开店确实影响了资金流和翻台率，让海底捞的“财报”没有那么好看，估值也颇受影响。但长期来看，在疫情复苏的大背景下，这也不失为一种长期策略。</p>\n<p>然而，比起资金投入带来的困境，品牌重新定位才是当代最紧要的。就目前现状来看，处于增长期的海底捞估值仍然在高位。彭博数据显示，1999～2007年是<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SBUX\">星巴克</a>的高速增长时期，估值中枢为57倍。海底捞过去三年的估值中枢约为242倍，因此尽管市值腰斩，但这也只是让海底捞的市盈率回到了相对正常的高位。</p>\n<p>业界普遍认为，此次回调很可能是永久性的。海底捞已经过了快速扩张带来的红利期，在固有的经营模式下，翻台率回升和盈利能否回涨目前仍是未知数。而这也就意味着海底捞需要寻找第二增长曲线。</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/79533db998adccab4fd6a4d03b3ae31c\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"333\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>▲图：海底捞官微</p>\n<p>另一方面，新的入局者也在给海底捞带来新的压力。哥老官、小龙坎、八合里等乘着网红经济走红的火锅店，也在不断对海底捞的霸主地位发起挑战，把目光放到更宽广的整个餐饮领域，各个餐饮品牌也在层出不穷的涌现。</p>\n<p>从现在海底捞呈交的答卷来看，关于海底捞的未来，外界并没有看出明确的答案。在食品安全，服务品质等被外界质疑的因素外，海底捞在擅长的服务领域也呈现出缓慢失势的状态，并且目前暂时也没有新的业务驱动其更快速的发展，未来能否持续增长也是外界颇为关注的焦点。</p>\n<p>想要持续坐稳餐饮第一股，并非想象中容易，除了必须要有过硬的产品和实力。如何调动起现行的餐饮矩阵，实现新的业绩增长正成为是海底捞的重中之重。</p>","source":"tencent","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>海底捞跌入海底</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n海底捞跌入海底\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-06-22 14:49 北京时间&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=http://gu.qq.com/resources/shy/news/detail-v2/index.html#/?id=nesSN2021062210504179c92f24&s=b><strong>观察者网</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>6月21日，#海底捞市值蒸发超2400亿港元#登上微博热搜，继上周市值跌破2000亿港元之后，海底捞今日股价再度跌超5%，四个月市值跌超2500亿港元。往前追溯一周，6月15日，开盘后的海底捞股价大跌近7%，至37.05港元，创出新低，盘中最低跌至1964亿港元。\n二级市场“败退”背后，是海底捞步步下跌的翻台率。根据海底捞年报数据显示，2019年海底捞餐厅一线和二线城市的翻台率分别为4.7/4.9...</p>\n\n<a href=\"http://gu.qq.com/resources/shy/news/detail-v2/index.html#/?id=nesSN2021062210504179c92f24&s=b\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/23f2c25e060d113f3768c45cafc16292","relate_stocks":{"06862":"海底捞"},"source_url":"http://gu.qq.com/resources/shy/news/detail-v2/index.html#/?id=nesSN2021062210504179c92f24&s=b","is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/9a95c1376e76363c1401fee7d3717173","article_id":"2145185037","content_text":"6月21日，#海底捞市值蒸发超2400亿港元#登上微博热搜，继上周市值跌破2000亿港元之后，海底捞今日股价再度跌超5%，四个月市值跌超2500亿港元。往前追溯一周，6月15日，开盘后的海底捞股价大跌近7%，至37.05港元，创出新低，盘中最低跌至1964亿港元。\n二级市场“败退”背后，是海底捞步步下跌的翻台率。根据海底捞年报数据显示，2019年海底捞餐厅一线和二线城市的翻台率分别为4.7/4.9次/天，较2018年5.1/5.3次/天均下降0.4次/天。2020年，海底捞餐厅整体翻台率为3.5次/天；2021年5月初，公司内部人士曾向券商透露4月份餐厅翻台率不到3次/天。这意味着，在餐饮行业大复苏的背景下，海底捞的翻台率却一直在下降。\n根据 国信证券 的测算，海底捞单店守住盈亏的平衡线为翻台率3次/天。因此，跌破3次/天也表示海底捞单店处于亏损或者微利状态。\n凭借着24小时营业和多业态服务的经营模式，海底捞迅速填补了中国夜生活市场的空缺，并制造属于海底捞自己的火锅业服务标准。在新消费趋势下获得许多食客好评，这也让海底捞有底气持续扩张，加快分店开设速度。\n然而，随着海底捞2020年财报的发布，外界也进一步窥探到这家火锅巨企在疫情之下的阵面，其市值更是从巅峰时期的4500亿港元跌至今日的不到2000亿港元。\n市值跌超2500亿港元背后，我们应该如何看待这样一家企业？\n01\n海底泡沫有多大\n市值跌下神坛的海底捞无疑正在经历着前所未有的至暗时刻。\n4500亿港元的故事是资本市场对于海底捞的估价，但这真的“名副其实”吗？从股价增长来看，在疫情大面积影响餐饮业情况下，海底捞确实实现了逆势增长，增长背后是二级市场的看好，同时也意味着对海底捞门店快速扩张的肯定，毕竟开店数量的增加往往意味着总营收的增加。门店数目越多，规模效应就越明显。\n数据显示，截至2020年年底，海底捞餐厅数为1298家，相比上年同期的768家增加了530家。其中1205家位于中国大陆，93家位于中国大陆以外14个国家和地区。\n2017年～2019年，是海底捞的“黄金时代”。这些年海底捞的门店数量以41%的年复合增长率进行扩张，整体餐厅翻台率始终保持高位，达到平均4.9次/天。翻台率的坚挺是营收和利润持续增长的最强保障，2019年业绩报告显示，海底捞全年实现收入265.56亿元，同比增长了56.5%，净利润23.47亿元，同比增长42.3%。\n\n▲图：海底捞官微\n从2019年即以前海底捞的扩张速度来看，即便是处于高速增长，利润和翻台率依旧没有下跌。而到了2020年，海底捞营业收入为286.14亿元，比2019年增长7.8%；年内溢利3.10亿元，比2019年下降86.8%?。海底捞在公告中表示，餐厅网络拓展是整体收入增长的主要驱动力。2020年海底捞营收的增长背后，是开店持续低效的大额投入。\n在股价和市值“疯狂”上涨背后，海底捞的泡沫也开始逐渐膨胀。\n疫情袭来，危机席卷了整个餐饮业。此时的海底捞并没有叫停原定的门店增开计划，而在市场需求紧缩背景下，短时间内大面积开店，不仅拉低了同区域其他门店的翻台率，新开分店本身大概率也难短期内盈利。同时，就海底捞本身规模来看，一二线城市餐饮需求最强大的区域在2020年及以前已经完成了覆盖。在深入一二线城市非中心领域和三四线城市过程中，海底捞有些过于着急。\n对于这样快速想要占领空白市场的巨头来说，今天资本市场的反应似乎说明了一切。\n02\n火锅还是服务\n当我们谈起海底捞，想起的第一个词是“火锅”还是“服务”？\n服务几乎成了海底捞的代名词。但海底捞主体业务所处的餐饮市场与服务业的规律却又大相径庭。\n火锅的市场规模可达万亿，海底捞的市场份额为6%，一方面，随着火锅业垂直赛道不断细分，除了海底捞，重庆火锅、潮汕牛肉火锅、牛蛙火锅也成为热门品类，另一方面，品牌数目的增多导致业内呈现多样化趋势，从火锅口味上很难以差异化优势取胜。\n纵观海底捞近几年的发展，火锅业背后，服务业的优势已然成为海底捞的第二级增长点，也是在扩张中保持领先的制胜法宝。“宾至如归”的服务为海底捞赢得了良好口碑，并保持着高于行业水准的用户粘性。\n\n▲图：海底捞官微\n然而，大规模扩张下沉市场带来了更多不同层次的客群用户，在提供服务过程中不可控性也增加了。今年5月，一则男子在海底捞内吃出蟑螂迅速上了头版头条，虽然最后被证明是男子自导自演的栽赃陷害，但一时不明真相的受众依然迅速将矛头直指海底捞，这也说明依托服务的海底捞，不得不随时面对外界时不时的“名誉挑战”。未来，面对更加多样化受众，如何去处理非典型客群，这也会为海底捞带来业绩之外的压力。\n另一方面，门店扩张也带来了管理难度的加大。过去海底捞优质化的餐饮服务已经成为了行业标杆，随着分店的开张，管理质量能否继续保持有待考究。网络上，抱怨“海底捞服务不如从前”的用户不在少数，想要继续保证服务水平和质量，海底捞不得不进一步加强管理上的投入。\n可以说，以服务为卖点始终只能锦上添花，扎实的产品质量才能保证企业的可持续发展。尤其是餐饮行业，做常青树本身已然十分困难，品牌层出不穷，大众的口味时刻也在变化，用服务吸引用户到店是海底捞的长板，但在火锅市场趋于饱和，疫情冲击大背景下，仅仅只有服务，不仅无法满足受众，资本也不会长期买单。\n03\n海底捞，何以捞\n估值腰斩，业绩下滑，海底捞的“双杀”困境如何解决？\n在疫情期间逆势扩张更像是海底捞在餐饮市场的一场豪赌。短线来看，开店确实影响了资金流和翻台率，让海底捞的“财报”没有那么好看，估值也颇受影响。但长期来看，在疫情复苏的大背景下，这也不失为一种长期策略。\n然而，比起资金投入带来的困境，品牌重新定位才是当代最紧要的。就目前现状来看，处于增长期的海底捞估值仍然在高位。彭博数据显示，1999～2007年是星巴克的高速增长时期，估值中枢为57倍。海底捞过去三年的估值中枢约为242倍，因此尽管市值腰斩，但这也只是让海底捞的市盈率回到了相对正常的高位。\n业界普遍认为，此次回调很可能是永久性的。海底捞已经过了快速扩张带来的红利期，在固有的经营模式下，翻台率回升和盈利能否回涨目前仍是未知数。而这也就意味着海底捞需要寻找第二增长曲线。\n\n▲图：海底捞官微\n另一方面，新的入局者也在给海底捞带来新的压力。哥老官、小龙坎、八合里等乘着网红经济走红的火锅店，也在不断对海底捞的霸主地位发起挑战，把目光放到更宽广的整个餐饮领域，各个餐饮品牌也在层出不穷的涌现。\n从现在海底捞呈交的答卷来看，关于海底捞的未来，外界并没有看出明确的答案。在食品安全，服务品质等被外界质疑的因素外，海底捞在擅长的服务领域也呈现出缓慢失势的状态，并且目前暂时也没有新的业务驱动其更快速的发展，未来能否持续增长也是外界颇为关注的焦点。\n想要持续坐稳餐饮第一股，并非想象中容易，除了必须要有过硬的产品和实力。如何调动起现行的餐饮矩阵，实现新的业绩增长正成为是海底捞的重中之重。","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":73,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[{"author":{"id":"3572046493348009","authorId":"3572046493348009","authorIdStr":"3572046493348009","name":"Savage_Never","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e8c5d3c6800ec12c32423a3100658845","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3572046493348009"},"content":"Do the task hey hey hey please praise please comment crab crab","text":"Do the task hey hey hey please praise please comment crab crab","html":"Do the task hey hey hey please praise please comment crab crab"}],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":111580893,"gmtCreate":1622686488312,"gmtModify":1704188921347,"author":{"id":"3557531278630339","authorId":"3557531278630339","authorIdStr":"3557531278630339","name":"Hannee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2a23162818c1e2b051d79f5521b6ee57","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3557531278630339"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Huawei will affect xm share price ! Be careful !!&nbsp;","listText":"Huawei will affect xm share price ! Be careful !!&nbsp;","text":"Huawei will affect xm share price ! Be careful !!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/111580893","repostId":"1151093197","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1151093197","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"为用户提供金融资讯、行情、数据，旨在帮助投资者理解世界，做投资决策。","home_visible":1,"media_name":"老虎资讯综合","id":"102","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1622684913,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1151093197?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-03 09:48","market":"other","language":"zh","title":"小米股价重回30港元关口，创2月中旬以来新高","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1151093197","media":"老虎资讯综合","summary":"6月2日，小米集团-W盘中股价重回30港元关口，股价创2月中旬以来新高。富时罗素宣布对富时中国50指数、富时中国A50指数、富时中国A150指数等指数季度审核变更，该变更将于6月18日收盘后生效。小米","content":"<p>6月2日，<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/01810\">小米集团-W</a>盘中股价重回30港元关口，股价创2月中旬以来新高。富时罗素宣布对富时中国50指数、富时中国A50指数、富时中国A150指数等指数季度审核变更，该变更将于6月18日收盘后生效。小米集团、中远海控、中信股份加入富时中国50指数。</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/53c2c20da020a77360e5e169d91207df\" tg-width=\"840\" tg-height=\"470\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>里昂发表研究报告，指小米首季表现强劲，并胜预期，收入按年增55％，高于该行预期2％。智能手机业务收入按年增70％，主因付运量按年增69％至4,940万部，物联网收入亦按年反弹41％。</p><p>基于供应短缺情况下，集团毛利率录18.4％创新高，经调整EBIT率为8.7％，主因折扣减少所致，经调整纯利按年大增164％至61亿元人民币。</p><p>该行预期，小米第二季全球智能手机付运量达5,000万部，收入维持50％按年增长。该行上调集团今明两年经调整纯利预测分别50％及12％，目标价由32港元升至34港元，重申评级为买入。</p><p></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>小米股价重回30港元关口，创2月中旬以来新高</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n小米股价重回30港元关口，创2月中旬以来新高\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/102\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">老虎资讯综合 </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-06-03 09:48</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>6月2日，<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/01810\">小米集团-W</a>盘中股价重回30港元关口，股价创2月中旬以来新高。富时罗素宣布对富时中国50指数、富时中国A50指数、富时中国A150指数等指数季度审核变更，该变更将于6月18日收盘后生效。小米集团、中远海控、中信股份加入富时中国50指数。</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/53c2c20da020a77360e5e169d91207df\" tg-width=\"840\" tg-height=\"470\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>里昂发表研究报告，指小米首季表现强劲，并胜预期，收入按年增55％，高于该行预期2％。智能手机业务收入按年增70％，主因付运量按年增69％至4,940万部，物联网收入亦按年反弹41％。</p><p>基于供应短缺情况下，集团毛利率录18.4％创新高，经调整EBIT率为8.7％，主因折扣减少所致，经调整纯利按年大增164％至61亿元人民币。</p><p>该行预期，小米第二季全球智能手机付运量达5,000万部，收入维持50％按年增长。该行上调集团今明两年经调整纯利预测分别50％及12％，目标价由32港元升至34港元，重申评级为买入。</p><p></p><p></p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3df686d3a6ca977e8c6841905eb7e18c","relate_stocks":{"01810":"小米集团-W"},"is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1151093197","content_text":"6月2日，小米集团-W盘中股价重回30港元关口，股价创2月中旬以来新高。富时罗素宣布对富时中国50指数、富时中国A50指数、富时中国A150指数等指数季度审核变更，该变更将于6月18日收盘后生效。小米集团、中远海控、中信股份加入富时中国50指数。里昂发表研究报告，指小米首季表现强劲，并胜预期，收入按年增55％，高于该行预期2％。智能手机业务收入按年增70％，主因付运量按年增69％至4,940万部，物联网收入亦按年反弹41％。基于供应短缺情况下，集团毛利率录18.4％创新高，经调整EBIT率为8.7％，主因折扣减少所致，经调整纯利按年大增164％至61亿元人民币。该行预期，小米第二季全球智能手机付运量达5,000万部，收入维持50％按年增长。该行上调集团今明两年经调整纯利预测分别50％及12％，目标价由32港元升至34港元，重申评级为买入。","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":68,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[{"author":{"id":"3564479083780631","authorId":"3564479083780631","authorIdStr":"3564479083780631","name":"第N次大变革大分流","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/7ac78897b78c47a3afab38088cf5216c","crmLevel":8,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3564479083780631"},"content":"xiaomi will beat huawei","text":"xiaomi will beat huawei","html":"xiaomi will beat huawei"}],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":802166732,"gmtCreate":1627735576926,"gmtModify":1703495343040,"author":{"id":"3557531278630339","authorId":"3557531278630339","authorIdStr":"3557531278630339","name":"Hannee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2a23162818c1e2b051d79f5521b6ee57","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3557531278630339"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/D05.SI\">$DBS GROUP HOLDINGS LTD(D05.SI)$</a> Drop in&nbsp;Friday due to investor cash out. Got chance for new wave, as old batch investor has left and cash out :)&nbsp;","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/D05.SI\">$DBS GROUP HOLDINGS LTD(D05.SI)$</a> Drop in&nbsp;Friday due to investor cash out. Got chance for new wave, as old batch investor has left and cash out :)&nbsp;","text":"$DBS GROUP HOLDINGS LTD(D05.SI)$ Drop in Friday due to investor cash out. Got chance for new wave, as old batch investor has left and cash out :)","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/802166732","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":191,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":155973743,"gmtCreate":1625371903482,"gmtModify":1703740954001,"author":{"id":"3557531278630339","authorId":"3557531278630339","authorIdStr":"3557531278630339","name":"Hannee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2a23162818c1e2b051d79f5521b6ee57","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3557531278630339"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"??","listText":"??","text":"??","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/155973743","repostId":"2148807114","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2148807114","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1625367960,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2148807114?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-04 11:06","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Can Biden really protect Americans from the next crippling cyber attack?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2148807114","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"International rivals have little incentive to stop attacks against the U.S.\nAn epidemic of cyberatta","content":"<p>International rivals have little incentive to stop attacks against the U.S.</p>\n<p>An epidemic of cyberattacks against the American government, citizens and businesses has raged for years, but experts say the U.S. government has been slow to respond, while remaining skeptical that proposed solutions would be effective in stopping international cyberthreats.</p>\n<p>The only major cybersecurity law passed during the past decade was the Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act of 2015, which created rules encouraging the private sector to share information about cyberattacks with the government, but did not make disclosure mandatory.</p>\n<p>Jim Lewis, director of the strategic technologies program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies told MarketWatch that congressional gridlock kept the Obama administration from passing a bipartisan law that would enable the federal government to require private companies to report cyberattacks.</p>\n<p>Read more: Colonial Pipeline CEO warns Congress that 'criminal gangs' are always 'sharpening their tactics' to target U.S. companies, government</p>\n<p>\"The idea of regulation used to be that you couldn't bring it up,\" he said. \"The Chamber of Commerce and and everyone else lined up to explain why it was bad. At the end of the day, Mitch McConnell decided that he didn't want to regulate,\" referring to the then Republican Senate majority leader from Kentucky. During the Trump administration, \"we pretty much sat out the last four years, it's painful to say that, but that's how it is,\" he added.</p>\n<p>President Joe Biden's administration, however, is attempting to make up for lost time with an executive order signed in May that would beef up U.S. government cyber security defenses and leverage the power of the federal procurement process to raise the security of software products.</p>\n<p>\"There's has really been a missed opportunity to use federal procurement to drive a secure market,\" Anne Neuberger, deputy national security adviser for cyber and emerging technology at the White House said during a virtual conference at CSIS last month.</p>\n<p>She added that the government is developing software standards that private providers must meet in order to sell to the government under the theory that higher quality software would become the industry standard, given the vast amount of software the government purchases annually. Neuberger argued that it wouldn't be cost effective for software providers to offer two products: a superior <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE\">one</a> to the government and a substandard <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> to the private sector.</p>\n<p>\"When you're building software in a world where you have sophisticated nation-state attackers constantly hunting for vulnerabilities in that software, build it in more secure ways,\" Neuberger said.</p>\n<p>Following last year's Solar Winds attack , which went unnoticed for months and threatened 18,000 companies and government agencies, and the Colonial Pipeline hack that led to widespread gasoline shortages in the U.S. Northeast, there finally seems to be an appetite for bipartisan legislation that would enable better oversight of critical infrastructure, according to Mark Gamis a senior vice president at Booz Allen Hamilton who advises federal clients on cyber operations.</p>\n<p>He pointed to reports of a proposal drafted by Democratic Sen. Mark Warner of Virginia and Republican senators Marco Rubio of Florida and Susan Collins of Maine that would require federal contractors and owners of critical infrastructure to report cyber incidents to federal authorities within 24 hours.</p>\n<p>\"That's important because the federal government has tremendous resources to bring to bear to help our with an incident, and in any sort of emergent situation, time is of the essence,\" he said, adding that the bipartisan nature of the bill indicates the GOP is now ready to get on board with mandatory reporting.</p>\n<p>Cybersecurity advocates have long argued that greater collaboration between government and business is essential to mitigate the effects of cybercrime.</p>\n<p>\"Governments and companies have different sources of information, insight and intelligence, wrote Paul Me, a lead partner for Cyber Risk at the consultancy Oliver Wyman in an op-ed for the World Economic Forum . \"Pooling them in a timely manner will create a clearer and more current picture of cyberthreats.\"</p>\n<p>CSIS' Jim Lewis, warned, however, that at its core the problem must be viewed through the lense of geopolitics, because the most sophisticated cyberattacks largely come from state actors or criminal groups in adversarial nations, including China, Iran and Russia. U.S. intelligence officials have said both the Solar Winds and Colonial Pipeline attack were done by Russian proxies.</p>\n<p>See also: Biden says he told Putin infrastructure should be 'off limits' to cyberattacks</p>\n<p>\"The Russians have a thriving cybercrime market and make billions of dollars a year,\" Lewis said. \"So why would they give that up, especially because the Kremlin enjoys the U.S. getting hit over the head?\"</p>\n<p>Lewis said that the Biden-Putin summit earlier this month was a success insofar as Biden set boundaries on acceptable behavior, with the president demanding that 16 critical infrastructure sectors , including energy and water, should be off-limits to cyberattacks. The question of how the U.S. would retaliate following a hack on one of these sectors, however, remains unanswered.</p>\n<p>\"The Russians have basically said that 'you have so many sanctions on us, one more won't make a difference,\" Lewis said, adding that the U.S. must get creative about an cyber-offensive approach to punish adversaries for their behavior, including shutting down cloud computing services that power the Russian internet.</p>\n<p>\"These are hard issues because the two things that the government needs to do is regulate U.S. companies while engaging with both allies and opponents on the international stage,\" Lewis added. \"Maybe that's too much for the government, but if it's too much in the government, we just need to get used to being whacked.\"</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Can Biden really protect Americans from the next crippling cyber attack?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nCan Biden really protect Americans from the next crippling cyber attack?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-07-04 11:06</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>International rivals have little incentive to stop attacks against the U.S.</p>\n<p>An epidemic of cyberattacks against the American government, citizens and businesses has raged for years, but experts say the U.S. government has been slow to respond, while remaining skeptical that proposed solutions would be effective in stopping international cyberthreats.</p>\n<p>The only major cybersecurity law passed during the past decade was the Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act of 2015, which created rules encouraging the private sector to share information about cyberattacks with the government, but did not make disclosure mandatory.</p>\n<p>Jim Lewis, director of the strategic technologies program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies told MarketWatch that congressional gridlock kept the Obama administration from passing a bipartisan law that would enable the federal government to require private companies to report cyberattacks.</p>\n<p>Read more: Colonial Pipeline CEO warns Congress that 'criminal gangs' are always 'sharpening their tactics' to target U.S. companies, government</p>\n<p>\"The idea of regulation used to be that you couldn't bring it up,\" he said. \"The Chamber of Commerce and and everyone else lined up to explain why it was bad. At the end of the day, Mitch McConnell decided that he didn't want to regulate,\" referring to the then Republican Senate majority leader from Kentucky. During the Trump administration, \"we pretty much sat out the last four years, it's painful to say that, but that's how it is,\" he added.</p>\n<p>President Joe Biden's administration, however, is attempting to make up for lost time with an executive order signed in May that would beef up U.S. government cyber security defenses and leverage the power of the federal procurement process to raise the security of software products.</p>\n<p>\"There's has really been a missed opportunity to use federal procurement to drive a secure market,\" Anne Neuberger, deputy national security adviser for cyber and emerging technology at the White House said during a virtual conference at CSIS last month.</p>\n<p>She added that the government is developing software standards that private providers must meet in order to sell to the government under the theory that higher quality software would become the industry standard, given the vast amount of software the government purchases annually. Neuberger argued that it wouldn't be cost effective for software providers to offer two products: a superior <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE\">one</a> to the government and a substandard <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> to the private sector.</p>\n<p>\"When you're building software in a world where you have sophisticated nation-state attackers constantly hunting for vulnerabilities in that software, build it in more secure ways,\" Neuberger said.</p>\n<p>Following last year's Solar Winds attack , which went unnoticed for months and threatened 18,000 companies and government agencies, and the Colonial Pipeline hack that led to widespread gasoline shortages in the U.S. Northeast, there finally seems to be an appetite for bipartisan legislation that would enable better oversight of critical infrastructure, according to Mark Gamis a senior vice president at Booz Allen Hamilton who advises federal clients on cyber operations.</p>\n<p>He pointed to reports of a proposal drafted by Democratic Sen. Mark Warner of Virginia and Republican senators Marco Rubio of Florida and Susan Collins of Maine that would require federal contractors and owners of critical infrastructure to report cyber incidents to federal authorities within 24 hours.</p>\n<p>\"That's important because the federal government has tremendous resources to bring to bear to help our with an incident, and in any sort of emergent situation, time is of the essence,\" he said, adding that the bipartisan nature of the bill indicates the GOP is now ready to get on board with mandatory reporting.</p>\n<p>Cybersecurity advocates have long argued that greater collaboration between government and business is essential to mitigate the effects of cybercrime.</p>\n<p>\"Governments and companies have different sources of information, insight and intelligence, wrote Paul Me, a lead partner for Cyber Risk at the consultancy Oliver Wyman in an op-ed for the World Economic Forum . \"Pooling them in a timely manner will create a clearer and more current picture of cyberthreats.\"</p>\n<p>CSIS' Jim Lewis, warned, however, that at its core the problem must be viewed through the lense of geopolitics, because the most sophisticated cyberattacks largely come from state actors or criminal groups in adversarial nations, including China, Iran and Russia. U.S. intelligence officials have said both the Solar Winds and Colonial Pipeline attack were done by Russian proxies.</p>\n<p>See also: Biden says he told Putin infrastructure should be 'off limits' to cyberattacks</p>\n<p>\"The Russians have a thriving cybercrime market and make billions of dollars a year,\" Lewis said. \"So why would they give that up, especially because the Kremlin enjoys the U.S. getting hit over the head?\"</p>\n<p>Lewis said that the Biden-Putin summit earlier this month was a success insofar as Biden set boundaries on acceptable behavior, with the president demanding that 16 critical infrastructure sectors , including energy and water, should be off-limits to cyberattacks. The question of how the U.S. would retaliate following a hack on one of these sectors, however, remains unanswered.</p>\n<p>\"The Russians have basically said that 'you have so many sanctions on us, one more won't make a difference,\" Lewis said, adding that the U.S. must get creative about an cyber-offensive approach to punish adversaries for their behavior, including shutting down cloud computing services that power the Russian internet.</p>\n<p>\"These are hard issues because the two things that the government needs to do is regulate U.S. companies while engaging with both allies and opponents on the international stage,\" Lewis added. \"Maybe that's too much for the government, but if it's too much in the government, we just need to get used to being whacked.\"</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2148807114","content_text":"International rivals have little incentive to stop attacks against the U.S.\nAn epidemic of cyberattacks against the American government, citizens and businesses has raged for years, but experts say the U.S. government has been slow to respond, while remaining skeptical that proposed solutions would be effective in stopping international cyberthreats.\nThe only major cybersecurity law passed during the past decade was the Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act of 2015, which created rules encouraging the private sector to share information about cyberattacks with the government, but did not make disclosure mandatory.\nJim Lewis, director of the strategic technologies program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies told MarketWatch that congressional gridlock kept the Obama administration from passing a bipartisan law that would enable the federal government to require private companies to report cyberattacks.\nRead more: Colonial Pipeline CEO warns Congress that 'criminal gangs' are always 'sharpening their tactics' to target U.S. companies, government\n\"The idea of regulation used to be that you couldn't bring it up,\" he said. \"The Chamber of Commerce and and everyone else lined up to explain why it was bad. At the end of the day, Mitch McConnell decided that he didn't want to regulate,\" referring to the then Republican Senate majority leader from Kentucky. During the Trump administration, \"we pretty much sat out the last four years, it's painful to say that, but that's how it is,\" he added.\nPresident Joe Biden's administration, however, is attempting to make up for lost time with an executive order signed in May that would beef up U.S. government cyber security defenses and leverage the power of the federal procurement process to raise the security of software products.\n\"There's has really been a missed opportunity to use federal procurement to drive a secure market,\" Anne Neuberger, deputy national security adviser for cyber and emerging technology at the White House said during a virtual conference at CSIS last month.\nShe added that the government is developing software standards that private providers must meet in order to sell to the government under the theory that higher quality software would become the industry standard, given the vast amount of software the government purchases annually. Neuberger argued that it wouldn't be cost effective for software providers to offer two products: a superior one to the government and a substandard one to the private sector.\n\"When you're building software in a world where you have sophisticated nation-state attackers constantly hunting for vulnerabilities in that software, build it in more secure ways,\" Neuberger said.\nFollowing last year's Solar Winds attack , which went unnoticed for months and threatened 18,000 companies and government agencies, and the Colonial Pipeline hack that led to widespread gasoline shortages in the U.S. Northeast, there finally seems to be an appetite for bipartisan legislation that would enable better oversight of critical infrastructure, according to Mark Gamis a senior vice president at Booz Allen Hamilton who advises federal clients on cyber operations.\nHe pointed to reports of a proposal drafted by Democratic Sen. Mark Warner of Virginia and Republican senators Marco Rubio of Florida and Susan Collins of Maine that would require federal contractors and owners of critical infrastructure to report cyber incidents to federal authorities within 24 hours.\n\"That's important because the federal government has tremendous resources to bring to bear to help our with an incident, and in any sort of emergent situation, time is of the essence,\" he said, adding that the bipartisan nature of the bill indicates the GOP is now ready to get on board with mandatory reporting.\nCybersecurity advocates have long argued that greater collaboration between government and business is essential to mitigate the effects of cybercrime.\n\"Governments and companies have different sources of information, insight and intelligence, wrote Paul Me, a lead partner for Cyber Risk at the consultancy Oliver Wyman in an op-ed for the World Economic Forum . \"Pooling them in a timely manner will create a clearer and more current picture of cyberthreats.\"\nCSIS' Jim Lewis, warned, however, that at its core the problem must be viewed through the lense of geopolitics, because the most sophisticated cyberattacks largely come from state actors or criminal groups in adversarial nations, including China, Iran and Russia. U.S. intelligence officials have said both the Solar Winds and Colonial Pipeline attack were done by Russian proxies.\nSee also: Biden says he told Putin infrastructure should be 'off limits' to cyberattacks\n\"The Russians have a thriving cybercrime market and make billions of dollars a year,\" Lewis said. \"So why would they give that up, especially because the Kremlin enjoys the U.S. getting hit over the head?\"\nLewis said that the Biden-Putin summit earlier this month was a success insofar as Biden set boundaries on acceptable behavior, with the president demanding that 16 critical infrastructure sectors , including energy and water, should be off-limits to cyberattacks. The question of how the U.S. would retaliate following a hack on one of these sectors, however, remains unanswered.\n\"The Russians have basically said that 'you have so many sanctions on us, one more won't make a difference,\" Lewis said, adding that the U.S. must get creative about an cyber-offensive approach to punish adversaries for their behavior, including shutting down cloud computing services that power the Russian internet.\n\"These are hard issues because the two things that the government needs to do is regulate U.S. companies while engaging with both allies and opponents on the international stage,\" Lewis added. \"Maybe that's too much for the government, but if it's too much in the government, we just need to get used to being whacked.\"","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":156,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":126918044,"gmtCreate":1624541965888,"gmtModify":1703839813550,"author":{"id":"3557531278630339","authorId":"3557531278630339","authorIdStr":"3557531278630339","name":"Hannee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2a23162818c1e2b051d79f5521b6ee57","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3557531278630339"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hope sp500 continue hit high!&nbsp;","listText":"Hope sp500 continue hit high!&nbsp;","text":"Hope sp500 continue hit high!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/126918044","repostId":"1167326019","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1167326019","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1624541460,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1167326019?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-24 21:31","market":"us","language":"en","title":"S&P 500 rises to retake record at the open, wiping out last week’s Fed swoon","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1167326019","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"(June 24) The S&P 500 climbed on Thursday, surpassing its record high set a week ago as the market f","content":"<p>(June 24)&nbsp;The S&amp;P 500 climbed on Thursday, surpassing its record high set a week ago as the market fully recovered losses triggered by the Federal Reserve’s surprise policy pivot.</p>\n<p>The broad equity benchmark rose 0.5% to hit an all-time high, retaking its previous record on June 14. The Dow Jones Industrial Average added 207 points, or 0.6%. The Nasdaq Composite jumped 0.6% to reach another record.</p>\n<p>A broad group of stocks gained to push the benchmarks to new highs. Tesla added more than 2%, while GM and Caterpillar each gained about 1%.</p>\n<p>Data out Thursday showed jobless claimstotaled 411,000for the week ended June 19, higher than an estimate of 380,000 from economists polled by Dow Jones.</p>\n<p>Traders are also monitoringinfrastructure package negotiations.A bipartisan group of Senators that have made progress on a plan will meet President Joe Biden at the White House Thursday. The lawmakers have worked for weeks to craft a roughly $1 trillion package that could get through Congress with support from both parties. Republicans have fought the president’s proposal to hike the corporate tax rate to 28% from 21%</p>\n<p>Bank shares gained ahead of theFed's annual bank stress test results, which are scheduled for release after the bell on Thursday. The test examines how banks fare during various hypothetical economic downturns. Banks were forced to freeze dividends and stop buybacks during the pandemic. These results should give them the greenlight to eventually raise payouts. Goldman Sachs shares rose about 1%.</p>\n<p>Despite Wednesday's hiccup, the three major indexes are up more than 1% this week, rallying from a sell-off last week after the Fed heightened inflation expectations and forecast rate hikes as soon as 2023. Comments from Fed Chair Jerome Powell during a Congressional testimony Tuesdayreiterated that inflation pressures should be temporary, which seemed to soothe market sentiment.</p>\n<p>\"Beneath the optimism, markets are at risk of becoming complacent – and vulnerable to shocks. Any signal that interest rates and bond yields could rise, even in the absence of pronounced inflationary pressure, could shatter market exuberance,\" Gaurav Mallik,&nbsp;chief portfolio strategist&nbsp;at&nbsp;State Street&nbsp;Global Advisors, said.</p>\n<p>\"Central banks will walk a tightrope between allowing the economy to run hot – which history has shown to be a bad idea – and managing inflation risk,\" he added.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>S&P 500 rises to retake record at the open, wiping out last week’s Fed swoon</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nS&P 500 rises to retake record at the open, wiping out last week’s Fed swoon\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-06-24 21:31</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>(June 24)&nbsp;The S&amp;P 500 climbed on Thursday, surpassing its record high set a week ago as the market fully recovered losses triggered by the Federal Reserve’s surprise policy pivot.</p>\n<p>The broad equity benchmark rose 0.5% to hit an all-time high, retaking its previous record on June 14. The Dow Jones Industrial Average added 207 points, or 0.6%. The Nasdaq Composite jumped 0.6% to reach another record.</p>\n<p>A broad group of stocks gained to push the benchmarks to new highs. Tesla added more than 2%, while GM and Caterpillar each gained about 1%.</p>\n<p>Data out Thursday showed jobless claimstotaled 411,000for the week ended June 19, higher than an estimate of 380,000 from economists polled by Dow Jones.</p>\n<p>Traders are also monitoringinfrastructure package negotiations.A bipartisan group of Senators that have made progress on a plan will meet President Joe Biden at the White House Thursday. The lawmakers have worked for weeks to craft a roughly $1 trillion package that could get through Congress with support from both parties. Republicans have fought the president’s proposal to hike the corporate tax rate to 28% from 21%</p>\n<p>Bank shares gained ahead of theFed's annual bank stress test results, which are scheduled for release after the bell on Thursday. The test examines how banks fare during various hypothetical economic downturns. Banks were forced to freeze dividends and stop buybacks during the pandemic. These results should give them the greenlight to eventually raise payouts. Goldman Sachs shares rose about 1%.</p>\n<p>Despite Wednesday's hiccup, the three major indexes are up more than 1% this week, rallying from a sell-off last week after the Fed heightened inflation expectations and forecast rate hikes as soon as 2023. Comments from Fed Chair Jerome Powell during a Congressional testimony Tuesdayreiterated that inflation pressures should be temporary, which seemed to soothe market sentiment.</p>\n<p>\"Beneath the optimism, markets are at risk of becoming complacent – and vulnerable to shocks. Any signal that interest rates and bond yields could rise, even in the absence of pronounced inflationary pressure, could shatter market exuberance,\" Gaurav Mallik,&nbsp;chief portfolio strategist&nbsp;at&nbsp;State Street&nbsp;Global Advisors, said.</p>\n<p>\"Central banks will walk a tightrope between allowing the economy to run hot – which history has shown to be a bad idea – and managing inflation risk,\" he added.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯","SPY":"标普500ETF"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1167326019","content_text":"(June 24) The S&P 500 climbed on Thursday, surpassing its record high set a week ago as the market fully recovered losses triggered by the Federal Reserve’s surprise policy pivot.\nThe broad equity benchmark rose 0.5% to hit an all-time high, retaking its previous record on June 14. The Dow Jones Industrial Average added 207 points, or 0.6%. The Nasdaq Composite jumped 0.6% to reach another record.\nA broad group of stocks gained to push the benchmarks to new highs. Tesla added more than 2%, while GM and Caterpillar each gained about 1%.\nData out Thursday showed jobless claimstotaled 411,000for the week ended June 19, higher than an estimate of 380,000 from economists polled by Dow Jones.\nTraders are also monitoringinfrastructure package negotiations.A bipartisan group of Senators that have made progress on a plan will meet President Joe Biden at the White House Thursday. The lawmakers have worked for weeks to craft a roughly $1 trillion package that could get through Congress with support from both parties. Republicans have fought the president’s proposal to hike the corporate tax rate to 28% from 21%\nBank shares gained ahead of theFed's annual bank stress test results, which are scheduled for release after the bell on Thursday. The test examines how banks fare during various hypothetical economic downturns. Banks were forced to freeze dividends and stop buybacks during the pandemic. These results should give them the greenlight to eventually raise payouts. Goldman Sachs shares rose about 1%.\nDespite Wednesday's hiccup, the three major indexes are up more than 1% this week, rallying from a sell-off last week after the Fed heightened inflation expectations and forecast rate hikes as soon as 2023. Comments from Fed Chair Jerome Powell during a Congressional testimony Tuesdayreiterated that inflation pressures should be temporary, which seemed to soothe market sentiment.\n\"Beneath the optimism, markets are at risk of becoming complacent – and vulnerable to shocks. Any signal that interest rates and bond yields could rise, even in the absence of pronounced inflationary pressure, could shatter market exuberance,\" Gaurav Mallik, chief portfolio strategist at State Street Global Advisors, said.\n\"Central banks will walk a tightrope between allowing the economy to run hot – which history has shown to be a bad idea – and managing inflation risk,\" he added.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":29,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":171368299,"gmtCreate":1626706891311,"gmtModify":1703763788104,"author":{"id":"3557531278630339","authorId":"3557531278630339","authorIdStr":"3557531278630339","name":"Hannee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2a23162818c1e2b051d79f5521b6ee57","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3557531278630339"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/03333\">$EVERGRANDE(03333)$</a>Omg! Government sure will take back this company!&nbsp;","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/03333\">$EVERGRANDE(03333)$</a>Omg! Government sure will take back this company!&nbsp;","text":"$EVERGRANDE(03333)$Omg! Government sure will take back this company!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/171368299","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":696,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":126078417,"gmtCreate":1624540332539,"gmtModify":1703839757469,"author":{"id":"3557531278630339","authorId":"3557531278630339","authorIdStr":"3557531278630339","name":"Hannee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2a23162818c1e2b051d79f5521b6ee57","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3557531278630339"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Gg!!","listText":"Gg!!","text":"Gg!!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/126078417","repostId":"1172727653","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":146,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":183459677,"gmtCreate":1623343224899,"gmtModify":1704201420854,"author":{"id":"3557531278630339","authorId":"3557531278630339","authorIdStr":"3557531278630339","name":"Hannee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2a23162818c1e2b051d79f5521b6ee57","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3557531278630339"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Gme is game over soon!&nbsp;","listText":"Gme is game over soon!&nbsp;","text":"Gme is game over soon!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/183459677","repostId":"1114471498","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1114471498","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"为用户提供金融资讯、行情、数据，旨在帮助投资者理解世界，做投资决策。","home_visible":1,"media_name":"老虎资讯综合","id":"102","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1623335336,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1114471498?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-10 22:28","market":"us","language":"zh","title":"【异动】散户抱团股Clover Health、游戏驿站均逾10%","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1114471498","media":"老虎资讯综合","summary":"6月10日，新的散户抱团股Clover Health跌近10%，此前美国银行将该公司评级从中性下调至弱于大盘，称其基本面无法支撑股价。在Reddit交易员帮助这只被严重做空的股票上涨后，投资者应远离该","content":"<p>6月10日，新的散户抱团股Clover Health跌近10%，此前<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BAC\">美国银行</a>将该公司评级从中性下调至弱于大盘，称其基本面无法支撑股价。在Reddit交易员帮助这只被严重做空的股票上涨后，投资者应远离该股。</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/171cbcb93fe3846698ab8c9f4e55de51\" tg-width=\"840\" tg-height=\"470\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>同时，<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GME\">游戏驿站</a>跌超10%，券商Baird称，游戏驿站的转型计划仍然成谜，预计其股价将下跌90%。此前，游戏驿站任命新的CEO和CFO。</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/528c9931e99aa29a3f581e74a2c4f2e0\" tg-width=\"840\" tg-height=\"470\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p></p>\n<p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>【异动】散户抱团股Clover Health、游戏驿站均逾10%</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n【异动】散户抱团股Clover Health、游戏驿站均逾10%\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/102\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">老虎资讯综合 </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-06-10 22:28</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>6月10日，新的散户抱团股Clover Health跌近10%，此前<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BAC\">美国银行</a>将该公司评级从中性下调至弱于大盘，称其基本面无法支撑股价。在Reddit交易员帮助这只被严重做空的股票上涨后，投资者应远离该股。</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/171cbcb93fe3846698ab8c9f4e55de51\" tg-width=\"840\" tg-height=\"470\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>同时，<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GME\">游戏驿站</a>跌超10%，券商Baird称，游戏驿站的转型计划仍然成谜，预计其股价将下跌90%。此前，游戏驿站任命新的CEO和CFO。</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/528c9931e99aa29a3f581e74a2c4f2e0\" tg-width=\"840\" tg-height=\"470\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p></p>\n<p></p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2c011e7fc6ac0d961e1625ddf97c3d63","relate_stocks":{"GME":"游戏驿站","CLOV":"Clover Health Corp"},"is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1114471498","content_text":"6月10日，新的散户抱团股Clover Health跌近10%，此前美国银行将该公司评级从中性下调至弱于大盘，称其基本面无法支撑股价。在Reddit交易员帮助这只被严重做空的股票上涨后，投资者应远离该股。\n\n同时，游戏驿站跌超10%，券商Baird称，游戏驿站的转型计划仍然成谜，预计其股价将下跌90%。此前，游戏驿站任命新的CEO和CFO。","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":179623927,"gmtCreate":1626521075369,"gmtModify":1703761413542,"author":{"id":"3557531278630339","authorId":"3557531278630339","authorIdStr":"3557531278630339","name":"Hannee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2a23162818c1e2b051d79f5521b6ee57","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3557531278630339"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/09988\">$Alibaba(09988)$</a>Last minutes&nbsp;have 50m buying before market close, next&nbsp;Monday open high!&nbsp;","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/09988\">$Alibaba(09988)$</a>Last minutes&nbsp;have 50m buying before market close, next&nbsp;Monday open high!&nbsp;","text":"$Alibaba(09988)$Last minutes have 50m buying before market close, next Monday open high!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/179623927","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":317,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":147181420,"gmtCreate":1626341611160,"gmtModify":1703758249617,"author":{"id":"3557531278630339","authorId":"3557531278630339","authorIdStr":"3557531278630339","name":"Hannee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2a23162818c1e2b051d79f5521b6ee57","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3557531278630339"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/02318\">$PING AN(02318)$</a>Today all cash flow into 2318. Should be next wave soon!&nbsp;","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/02318\">$PING AN(02318)$</a>Today all cash flow into 2318. Should be next wave soon!&nbsp;","text":"$PING AN(02318)$Today all cash flow into 2318. Should be next wave soon!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/147181420","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":122,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":148739861,"gmtCreate":1626014916953,"gmtModify":1703751955195,"author":{"id":"3557531278630339","authorId":"3557531278630339","authorIdStr":"3557531278630339","name":"Hannee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2a23162818c1e2b051d79f5521b6ee57","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3557531278630339"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"They must have R&amp;d for battery. Or find byd","listText":"They must have R&amp;d for battery. Or find byd","text":"They must have R&d for battery. Or find byd","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/148739861","repostId":"1166379040","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1166379040","pubTimestamp":1625968800,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1166379040?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-11 10:00","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple AirPod batteries are almost impossible to replace, showing the need for right-to-repair reform","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1166379040","media":"CNBC","summary":"KEY POINTS\n\nOwners have noticed that Apple AirPods eventually will last only an hour or so before ne","content":"<div>\n<p>KEY POINTS\n\nOwners have noticed that Apple AirPods eventually will last only an hour or so before needing to be recharged, compared to their four-to-five-hour battery life out of the box.\nBut it’s ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/07/10/apple-airpod-battery-life-problem-shows-need-for-right-to-repair-laws.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"cnbc_highlight","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple AirPod batteries are almost impossible to replace, showing the need for right-to-repair reform</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple AirPod batteries are almost impossible to replace, showing the need for right-to-repair reform\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-11 10:00 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.cnbc.com/2021/07/10/apple-airpod-battery-life-problem-shows-need-for-right-to-repair-laws.html><strong>CNBC</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>KEY POINTS\n\nOwners have noticed that Apple AirPods eventually will last only an hour or so before needing to be recharged, compared to their four-to-five-hour battery life out of the box.\nBut it’s ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/07/10/apple-airpod-battery-life-problem-shows-need-for-right-to-repair-laws.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/07/10/apple-airpod-battery-life-problem-shows-need-for-right-to-repair-laws.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/72bb72e1b84c09fca865c6dcb1bbcd16","article_id":"1166379040","content_text":"KEY POINTS\n\nOwners have noticed that Apple AirPods eventually will last only an hour or so before needing to be recharged, compared to their four-to-five-hour battery life out of the box.\nBut it’s almost impossible to replace the battery at home because AirPods are tiny, packed with components, and hard to take apart.\nA new startup called PodSwap is aiming to make it easier to repair AirPods and keep them out of landfills or recycling plants, but its challenges show the need for right-to-repair laws.\n\nWhen AirPods were first released in 2016, they were a marvel of miniaturization.\nTo ditch cords and go wireless,Apple packed several chips, microphones and speakers into each headphone, which weigh about 4 grams. Without a cord, the earbud gets its power from a tiny cylindrical battery that has about 1% of the capacity of an iPhone’s battery.\nBut lithium-ion batteries, like those used by the AirPods, wear out the more they are used.\nSome owners have noticed that, after a few years, used AirPods eventually will last only an hour or so before needing to be recharged -- a big decay from the four-to-five-hour battery life they have when new. Because each AirPod is so small and so tightly packed into its housing, it’s almost impossible to swap out the old battery for a new one. Most people give up and just buy a new pair.\nThe limited lifespan of AirPods is exactly the kind of problem that the “right-to-repair” movement wants to fix. Repair shops and lobbyists that support repair reform want lawmakers to implement a variety of rules, including increased access to manuals and official parts and consumer protections around warranties.\nBut one of their most important requests is for companies to design products with repair in mind, instead of packing gadgets with unlabeled parts and sticking them together with glue, forcing users to use a knife to take them apart.\nThis desire puts repair advocates at odds with hardware companies like Apple, whose business models depend on customers upgrading to the latest model every few years. When Apple offered cheap iPhone battery repairs a few years ago, it hurt sales as consumers were able to hang on to their old phones for longer instead of upgrading. Apple also charges customers for repairs and extended warranties.\n“We design our products for durability in order to minimize the need for repair,” Apple wrote in an environmental report earlier this year. “But in the instance a repair is needed, we believe our customers should have convenient access to safe and reliable repair services, to get their product back up and running as quickly as possible.”\nThe right-to-repair movement gains steam\nPolicymakers have started to engage more closely with right-to-repair advocates in recent years. State-level bills have been introduced in a majority of states, but electronics companies have lobbied against them and none have passed.\nIn May, the Federal Trade Commission released a 56-page report on repair restrictions, concluding that repair restrictions have “steered consumers into manufacturers’ repair networks or to replace products before the end of their useful lives” — exactly the problem users are running into with their AirPods.\nThe Biden administration on Friday ordered the FTC to write new regulations targeted at limiting manufacturers’ ability to hamper independent or do-it-yourself repairs as part of a sweeping executive order. New repair rules have not yet been drafted.\n“Tech and other companies impose restrictions on self and third-party repairs, making repairs more costly and time-consuming, such as by restricting the distribution of parts, diagnostics, and repair tools,” the White House wrote in a fact sheet about the order on Friday, linking to a story about fixing Apple products. Apple declined to comment on the White House executive order.\nThe FTC has not said what it plans to do, but repair advocates want a few key policy changes, as detailed in its May report. They want companies to be required to make official replacement parts available. They want access to tools that could make repairs easier without reverse-engineering the tools or parts themselves. And ultimately, they want products to be designed with longer lifespans.\nApple is not the only company that would be affected by these policies. Much of the recent pressure is on medical device companies and tractor manufacturers. But given Apple’s ubiquity, it has become a poster child for repair, especially because it promotes its environmental efforts as a corporate value.\nApple has launched a program it calls the “Independent Repair Program” which gives repair shops the option to enter into a certification process and contract with Apple in order to get access to authentic Apple parts, tools and manuals.\nApple has also reduced the price of its battery replacement for iPhones, and recent models have been designed to make it easier to replace a battery or cracked screen, according to iFixit. Plus, compared to other consumer electronics companies, Apple has a large existing network of stores and authorized repair shops.\nStill, many Apple products remain challenging to repair at home or as a business with no contact with Apple.\nThe only AirPods battery replacement company\niFixit, a company that provides disassembly instructions and sells replacement parts for gadgets, gives AirPods models a score of zero out of 10 for repairability. According to iFixit, repairing these earbuds involves soldering, hot air guns and slicing through glue — that is, if replacement battery parts are even available. In the end, a would-be home repairer would have to put the four-gram computer back together again.\nApple provides “battery service” for AirPods, at the cost of $49 per earbud. But functionally, Apple simply gives you a replacement pair, and the old earbuds are recycled. It’s not a repair, it’s a replacement. And it’s expensive. AirPods originally cost $159, so opting for battery service costs more than half of the price of a new pair.\nApple sold about 72.8 million AirPods units in 2020, according to a CounterPoint research estimate, so tens of millions of consumers will face the same lack of choice in the coming years.\nPodSwap is a Miami company founded by Emma Stritzinger and Emily Alpert which aims to keep AirPods “out of the landfill.” They’re not associated with Apple.\nThey believe they’re the only company performing AirPod battery replacements, although other companies “refurbish” old AirPods, the founders told CNBC. The company was formed after the founders experienced dying AirPods themselves and thought that upgrading or replacing them would be wasteful and impractical.\nI recently replaced a pair of AirPods that were only holding a charge for 45 minutes -- too short to complete a phone call. I paid $59 on PodSwap’s Shopify site and a few days later received a replacement pair of AirPods with new batteries. They weren’t my old AirPods, they were another set that had their batteries replaced.\nAlong with those new pods, PodSwap includes a box and a return label. It wants your old AirPods back. It then cleans and sanitizes the old pair, puts in new batteries and sends them out to the next person who wants to change the battery in their old AirPods.\nBut PodSwap faces many challenges that show why repair advocates want new rules. Alpert said the design of the AirPod makes it challenging for repair shops or companies like theirs to do a lot of battery replacements. PodSwap’s process uses both robotics and manual labor, the founders said.\n“The process was developed through trial and error and a large number of units were ‘sacrificed’ and ultimately recycled. One major challenge we faced was overcoming the uniqueness of this product. Each AirPod is assembled with slight differences, which creates complexity in the disassembly,” Alpert said.\nPodSwap plans to soon offer service for the AirPods Pro, a newer model that costs $249 and are, surprisingly, powered by a standard-sized coin battery.\nBut the AirPods Pro have many of the same problems as the first model — tight tolerances, potential damage while taking them apart, a lack of replacement parts, and a design that suggests the product was always designed to last a limited time.\n“We have found the AirPods Pro’s batteries to be more difficult to replace,” Alpert said. “The ergonomic design and tight unforgiving tolerances make it exceptionally challenging to replace the batteries repeatedly, with a high degree of efficiency.”\nPodSwap wasn’t totally seamless for me — I got sent a combination of “first generation” and “second generation” AirPods. They caused my iPhone to send error messages, but I sent an email to PodSwap and a day or two later I got a second replacement set, which worked.\nAfter that, I sent my first replacement set and my old AirPods back. The AirPods I received look and work like new.\nI plan on trying to get another four years out of them.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":5,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":183450539,"gmtCreate":1623343183021,"gmtModify":1704201418073,"author":{"id":"3557531278630339","authorId":"3557531278630339","authorIdStr":"3557531278630339","name":"Hannee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2a23162818c1e2b051d79f5521b6ee57","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3557531278630339"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"WilL this affected Hong Kong stamp duty aswell ? If yes it will be a good news&nbsp;","listText":"WilL this affected Hong Kong stamp duty aswell ? If yes it will be a good news&nbsp;","text":"WilL this affected Hong Kong stamp duty aswell ? If yes it will be a good news","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/183450539","repostId":"1142982381","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1142982381","pubTimestamp":1623336001,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1142982381?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-10 22:40","market":"sh","language":"zh","title":"印花税法来了，明年7月实施！最新最全税率表一图看懂","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1142982381","media":"21金融圈","summary":"据新华网6月10日消息，十三届全国人大常委会第二十九次会议当日下午表决通过印花税法，自2022年7月1日起施行。1988年8月6日国务院发布的《中华人民共和国印花税暂行条例》将同时废止。\n\n据中国人大","content":"<p>据新华网6月10日消息，十三届全国人大常委会第二十九次会议当日下午表决通过<b>印花税法</b>，自2022年7月1日起施行。1988年8月6日国务院发布的《中华人民共和国印花税暂行条例》将同时废止。</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/458e06108ca9aa8605a6a989ffb2f864\" tg-width=\"514\" tg-height=\"771\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>据中国人大网消息，印花税法总体上维持现行税制框架不变，<b>适当降低税率、简并税目、减轻税负，进一步明确征税范围，完善税收优惠规定</b>等。</p>\n<p>随着印花税法的制定出台，我国现行18个税种中已有12个制定了法律，税收法定加快落实，税收立法再进一程。</p>\n<p><b>划重点：印花税法相较于</b></p>\n<p><b>“印花税暂行条例”有何变化</b>？</p>\n<p><b>所谓“印花税”，简单来说，就是在经济活动中我们登记受领各种“证”所征收的税。</b>因采用在相应税凭证上粘贴印花税票作为完税标志而得名。</p>\n<p>小编先给大家划个重点，印花税法相较于“印花税暂行条例”有什么变化？</p>\n<p>1、借款合同、买卖合同、技术合同、证券交易等税目维持现行税率不变，其中<b>证券交易</b>印花税对证券交易的出让方征收，不对受让方征收；</p>\n<p>2、加工承揽合同、建设工程勘察设计合同、货物运输合同的税率由万分之五降为<b>万分之三</b>；</p>\n<p>3、<b>营业账簿</b>的税率由万分之五降为万分之二点五；</p>\n<p>4、<b>取消对权利、许可证照每件征收5元印花税的规定。</b>这意味着以后房产证、土地使用证、工商营业执照、商标注册证和专利权证将不用交印花税了！</p>\n<p>此前，外界十分关注证券交易印花税税率是否下调，在这部法律中，相关印花税税率并没有调整，仍然将维持成交额的千分之一的税率，而且只对证券交易的出让方征收，不对受让方征收。</p>\n<p>不过与现行印花税暂行条例相比，<b>印花税法除了将证券交易印花税写入外，还扩大了征税范围。</b></p>\n<p>印花税法明确，本法所称证券交易，是指转让在依法设立的证券交易所、国务院批准的其他全国性证券交易场所交易的股票和以股票为基础的存托凭证。</p>\n<p>据了解，这是以股票为基础发行的存托凭证首次明确纳入印花税征税范围，现行的证券交易印花税并不涉及以股票为基础发行的存托凭证。</p>\n<p>此外，印花税法将“商标专用权、著作权、专利权、专有技术使用权转让书据”的税率由万分之五降低至万分之三，进一步落实减税降费，支持创新发展，鼓励知识产权实施应用。</p>\n<p>根据国民经济和社会发展的需要，国务院对居民住房需求保障、企业改制重组、支持小型微型企业发展等情形可以规定减征或者免征印花税，报全国人民代表大会常务委员会备案。</p>\n<p>据了解，印花税法的其他变化还包括：将加工承揽合同、建设工程勘察设计合同、货物运输合同的税率由万分之五降为万分之三；将营业账簿的税率由万分之五降为万分之二点五；取消对权利、许可证照每件征收5元印花税的规定等。</p>\n<p><b>证券交易印花税调整权收归人大意味着什么？</b></p>\n<p>从刚获通过的印花税法来看，印花税法对证券交易印花税也有一个很重要的调整：将证券交易印花税税率的调整权收归人大。</p>\n<p>从过去情况来看，证券交易印花税的管理一直并未纳入到法律的轨道，只是以法规条例的方式来管理，所以证券交易印花税税率的调整权隶属于国务院，通常由财政部、税务总局、证监会来联合决定。</p>\n<p>而且，财政部和国家税务总局在2018年11月1日对外发布《中华人民共和国印花税法(征求意见稿)》时还曾作出规定，证券交易印花税的纳税人或者税率调整，由国务院决定，并报全国人民代表大会常务委员会备案。</p>\n<p>但从印花税法(草案)二审稿来看，国务院可以根据国民经济和社会发展需要，对居民住房需求保障、企业改制重组、支持小型微型企业发展等情形规定减征或者免征印花税，报全国人民代表大会常务委员会备案。证券交易印花税的调整并没有纳入到国务院决定的范围中来，这就意味着证券交易印花税的调整只能由全国人大及其常委会来完成。</p>\n<p>据国际金融报评论认为，证券交易印花税调整权收归人大至少透露出三个层面的信息。</p>\n<p><b>首先，这是高层落实“不干预”监管思路的一种表现。</b>近年来，高层对于资本市场的监管提出了“建制度、不干预、零容忍”的九字方针。一直以来，证券交易印花税调整就是管理层调控股市的一个重要手段，最著名的事例就是2007年“5·30”的“半夜鸡叫”。为了打压当时过热的股市行情，财政部于当年5月29日深夜作出决定，从5月30日起，将股票交易印花税税率由1‰调整为3‰，股市因此大跌。而将证券交易印花税调整权收归人大，就可以减少这类干预。</p>\n<p><b>其次，此举也意味着证券交易印花税税率一经确定就将会在较长时间内保持稳定。</b>毕竟通过全国人大及其常委会来调整证券交易印花税需要走较长的法律程序。</p>\n<p><b>最后，意味着证券交易印花税将会恢复其作为税收的本来目的，对股市的调节功能将会逐步削弱。</b></p>\n<p><b>印花税最新最全税率表</b></p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c1c5ab4f96e7bfd9e22c1f49077fbf71\" tg-width=\"766\" tg-height=\"2758\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>","source":"lsy1596638540193","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>印花税法来了，明年7月实施！最新最全税率表一图看懂</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n印花税法来了，明年7月实施！最新最全税率表一图看懂\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-06-10 22:40 北京时间&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=http://finance.eastmoney.com/a/202106101957402764.html><strong>21金融圈</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>据新华网6月10日消息，十三届全国人大常委会第二十九次会议当日下午表决通过印花税法，自2022年7月1日起施行。1988年8月6日国务院发布的《中华人民共和国印花税暂行条例》将同时废止。\n\n据中国人大网消息，印花税法总体上维持现行税制框架不变，适当降低税率、简并税目、减轻税负，进一步明确征税范围，完善税收优惠规定等。\n随着印花税法的制定出台，我国现行18个税种中已有12个制定了法律，税收法定加快...</p>\n\n<a href=\"http://finance.eastmoney.com/a/202106101957402764.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1dc0409fc1e82290964bf78ddc3d4f5d","relate_stocks":{"000001.SH":"上证指数"},"source_url":"http://finance.eastmoney.com/a/202106101957402764.html","is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1142982381","content_text":"据新华网6月10日消息，十三届全国人大常委会第二十九次会议当日下午表决通过印花税法，自2022年7月1日起施行。1988年8月6日国务院发布的《中华人民共和国印花税暂行条例》将同时废止。\n\n据中国人大网消息，印花税法总体上维持现行税制框架不变，适当降低税率、简并税目、减轻税负，进一步明确征税范围，完善税收优惠规定等。\n随着印花税法的制定出台，我国现行18个税种中已有12个制定了法律，税收法定加快落实，税收立法再进一程。\n划重点：印花税法相较于\n“印花税暂行条例”有何变化？\n所谓“印花税”，简单来说，就是在经济活动中我们登记受领各种“证”所征收的税。因采用在相应税凭证上粘贴印花税票作为完税标志而得名。\n小编先给大家划个重点，印花税法相较于“印花税暂行条例”有什么变化？\n1、借款合同、买卖合同、技术合同、证券交易等税目维持现行税率不变，其中证券交易印花税对证券交易的出让方征收，不对受让方征收；\n2、加工承揽合同、建设工程勘察设计合同、货物运输合同的税率由万分之五降为万分之三；\n3、营业账簿的税率由万分之五降为万分之二点五；\n4、取消对权利、许可证照每件征收5元印花税的规定。这意味着以后房产证、土地使用证、工商营业执照、商标注册证和专利权证将不用交印花税了！\n此前，外界十分关注证券交易印花税税率是否下调，在这部法律中，相关印花税税率并没有调整，仍然将维持成交额的千分之一的税率，而且只对证券交易的出让方征收，不对受让方征收。\n不过与现行印花税暂行条例相比，印花税法除了将证券交易印花税写入外，还扩大了征税范围。\n印花税法明确，本法所称证券交易，是指转让在依法设立的证券交易所、国务院批准的其他全国性证券交易场所交易的股票和以股票为基础的存托凭证。\n据了解，这是以股票为基础发行的存托凭证首次明确纳入印花税征税范围，现行的证券交易印花税并不涉及以股票为基础发行的存托凭证。\n此外，印花税法将“商标专用权、著作权、专利权、专有技术使用权转让书据”的税率由万分之五降低至万分之三，进一步落实减税降费，支持创新发展，鼓励知识产权实施应用。\n根据国民经济和社会发展的需要，国务院对居民住房需求保障、企业改制重组、支持小型微型企业发展等情形可以规定减征或者免征印花税，报全国人民代表大会常务委员会备案。\n据了解，印花税法的其他变化还包括：将加工承揽合同、建设工程勘察设计合同、货物运输合同的税率由万分之五降为万分之三；将营业账簿的税率由万分之五降为万分之二点五；取消对权利、许可证照每件征收5元印花税的规定等。\n证券交易印花税调整权收归人大意味着什么？\n从刚获通过的印花税法来看，印花税法对证券交易印花税也有一个很重要的调整：将证券交易印花税税率的调整权收归人大。\n从过去情况来看，证券交易印花税的管理一直并未纳入到法律的轨道，只是以法规条例的方式来管理，所以证券交易印花税税率的调整权隶属于国务院，通常由财政部、税务总局、证监会来联合决定。\n而且，财政部和国家税务总局在2018年11月1日对外发布《中华人民共和国印花税法(征求意见稿)》时还曾作出规定，证券交易印花税的纳税人或者税率调整，由国务院决定，并报全国人民代表大会常务委员会备案。\n但从印花税法(草案)二审稿来看，国务院可以根据国民经济和社会发展需要，对居民住房需求保障、企业改制重组、支持小型微型企业发展等情形规定减征或者免征印花税，报全国人民代表大会常务委员会备案。证券交易印花税的调整并没有纳入到国务院决定的范围中来，这就意味着证券交易印花税的调整只能由全国人大及其常委会来完成。\n据国际金融报评论认为，证券交易印花税调整权收归人大至少透露出三个层面的信息。\n首先，这是高层落实“不干预”监管思路的一种表现。近年来，高层对于资本市场的监管提出了“建制度、不干预、零容忍”的九字方针。一直以来，证券交易印花税调整就是管理层调控股市的一个重要手段，最著名的事例就是2007年“5·30”的“半夜鸡叫”。为了打压当时过热的股市行情，财政部于当年5月29日深夜作出决定，从5月30日起，将股票交易印花税税率由1‰调整为3‰，股市因此大跌。而将证券交易印花税调整权收归人大，就可以减少这类干预。\n其次，此举也意味着证券交易印花税税率一经确定就将会在较长时间内保持稳定。毕竟通过全国人大及其常委会来调整证券交易印花税需要走较长的法律程序。\n最后，意味着证券交易印花税将会恢复其作为税收的本来目的，对股市的调节功能将会逐步削弱。\n印花税最新最全税率表","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":28,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":180565652,"gmtCreate":1623213168076,"gmtModify":1704198498016,"author":{"id":"3557531278630339","authorId":"3557531278630339","authorIdStr":"3557531278630339","name":"Hannee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2a23162818c1e2b051d79f5521b6ee57","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3557531278630339"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Be more careful penny stock! Especially total equity less than hkd100m&nbsp;","listText":"Be more careful penny stock! Especially total equity less than hkd100m&nbsp;","text":"Be more careful penny stock! Especially total equity less than hkd100m","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/180565652","repostId":"1123045815","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":16,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}