Treeshaker personal page - To The Moon

Treeshaker

Treeshaker

No personal profile

16Follow

1Followers

0Topic

0Badge

2022-03-23

$Mogo Finance Technology Inc.(MOGO)$Viable business. So much cash. Announces to buy back.Can try.

2022-01-13

$Tonix Pharmaceuticals(TNXP)$Think it is betteroff to just liquidate the company. Shareholders may be better off?

2021-06-17

$Globalstar(GSAT)$Lets go baby.

2021-03-12

I have about $100 (round up to nearest 100).

Warren Buffett is now worth $100 billion

2021-03-05

Oil up pls.

U.S. added 379,000 jobs in February, better than expected

2021-02-24

Oh dear. Take the tiger coins then.

The days of easy money in the stock market are now over

2021-02-20

Wow.

Uber drivers should be classified as workers not independent contractors, top UK court rules

2020-12-22

$BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty(BPT)$Wah. If i am US tax residence. With same level of dividends, i canbreakeven within 3 years.

Go to Tiger App to see more news

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"userPageInfo":{"id":"3561847149000384","uuid":"3561847149000384","gmtCreate":1598754045951,"gmtModify":1608630775090,"name":"Treeshaker","pinyin":"treeshaker","introduction":"","introductionEn":"","signature":"","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/decf8e441d973187eb27d732a59be17d","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":1,"headSize":16,"tweetSize":26,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":3,"name":"书生虎","nameTw":"書生虎","represent":"努力向上","factor":"发布10条非转发主帖,其中5条获得他人回复或点赞","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":"success","userBadges":[{"badgeId":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493-3","templateUuid":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493","name":" Tiger Idol","description":"Join the tiger community for 1500 days","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8b40ae7da5bf081a1c84df14bf9e6367","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f160eceddd7c284a8e1136557615cfad","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/11792805c468334a9b31c39f95a41c6a","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2024.10.08","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"44212b71d0be4ec88898348dbe882e03-3","templateUuid":"44212b71d0be4ec88898348dbe882e03","name":"President Tiger","description":"The transaction amount of the securities account reaches $1,000,000","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fbeac6bb240db7da8b972e5183d050ba","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/436cdf80292b99f0a992e78750ac4e3a","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/506a259a7b456f037592c3b23c779599","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":1,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.07.14","exceedPercentage":"93.10%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1101},{"badgeId":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789-1","templateUuid":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789","name":"Knowledgeable Investor","description":"Traded more than 10 stocks","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e74cc24115c4fbae6154ec1b1041bf47","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d48265cbfd97c57f9048db29f22227b0","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76c6d6898b073c77e1c537ebe9ac1c57","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1102},{"badgeId":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84-1","templateUuid":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84","name":"Real Trader","description":"Completed a transaction","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100},{"badgeId":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be-3","templateUuid":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be","name":"Legendary Trader","description":"Total number of securities or futures transactions reached 300","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/656db16598a0b8f21429e10d6c1cb033","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/03f10910d4dd9234f9b5702a3342193a","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0c767e35268feb729d50d3fa9a386c5a","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":"93.99%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":5,"currentWearingBadge":{"badgeId":"44212b71d0be4ec88898348dbe882e03-3","templateUuid":"44212b71d0be4ec88898348dbe882e03","name":"President Tiger","description":"The transaction amount of the securities account reaches $1,000,000","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fbeac6bb240db7da8b972e5183d050ba","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/436cdf80292b99f0a992e78750ac4e3a","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/506a259a7b456f037592c3b23c779599","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":1,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.07.14","exceedPercentage":"93.52%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1101},"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":null,"starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"post","tweets":[{"id":9037100559,"gmtCreate":1648043969260,"gmtModify":1676534296249,"author":{"id":"3561847149000384","authorId":"3561847149000384","name":"Treeshaker","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/decf8e441d973187eb27d732a59be17d","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3561847149000384","authorIdStr":"3561847149000384"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/MOGO\">$Mogo Finance Technology Inc.(MOGO)$</a>Viable business.&nbsp;So much cash. Announces to buy back.Can try.&nbsp;","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/MOGO\">$Mogo Finance Technology Inc.(MOGO)$</a>Viable business.&nbsp;So much cash. Announces to buy back.Can try.&nbsp;","text":"$Mogo Finance Technology Inc.(MOGO)$Viable business. So much cash. Announces to buy back.Can try.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9037100559","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":518,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9002452024,"gmtCreate":1642080069296,"gmtModify":1676533678594,"author":{"id":"3561847149000384","authorId":"3561847149000384","name":"Treeshaker","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/decf8e441d973187eb27d732a59be17d","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3561847149000384","authorIdStr":"3561847149000384"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/TNXP\">$Tonix Pharmaceuticals(TNXP)$</a>Think it is betteroff to just liquidate the company. Shareholders may be better off?","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/TNXP\">$Tonix Pharmaceuticals(TNXP)$</a>Think it is betteroff to just liquidate the company. Shareholders may be better off?","text":"$Tonix Pharmaceuticals(TNXP)$Think it is betteroff to just liquidate the company. Shareholders may be better off?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9002452024","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":653,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":161574720,"gmtCreate":1623937025460,"gmtModify":1703823940077,"author":{"id":"3561847149000384","authorId":"3561847149000384","name":"Treeshaker","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/decf8e441d973187eb27d732a59be17d","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3561847149000384","authorIdStr":"3561847149000384"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GSAT\">$Globalstar(GSAT)$</a>Lets go baby.&nbsp;","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GSAT\">$Globalstar(GSAT)$</a>Lets go baby.&nbsp;","text":"$Globalstar(GSAT)$Lets go baby.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/161574720","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":320,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":328343377,"gmtCreate":1615502016999,"gmtModify":1704783660002,"author":{"id":"3561847149000384","authorId":"3561847149000384","name":"Treeshaker","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/decf8e441d973187eb27d732a59be17d","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3561847149000384","authorIdStr":"3561847149000384"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"I have about $100 (round up to nearest 100).","listText":"I have about $100 (round up to nearest 100).","text":"I have about $100 (round up to nearest 100).","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/328343377","repostId":"1119544264","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1119544264","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1615476407,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1119544264?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-03-11 23:26","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Warren Buffett is now worth $100 billion","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1119544264","media":"CNN Business","summary":"New York/Hong Kong  - Warren Buffett has just joined the world's most exclusive club of the mega rich.The legendary American investor was worth $100 billion on Thursday, according to the Bloomberg Billionaire's Index. That puts him in the company of just five other men above that threshold. And he's now the sixth richest person in the world, ranking just behindFacebookCEO Mark Zuckerberg.The 90-year-old Buffett has added nearly $13 billion to his net worth this year as shares in his industrial a","content":"<p><b>New York/Hong Kong (CNN Business)&nbsp;-&nbsp;</b>Warren Buffett has just joined the world's most exclusive club of the mega rich.</p>\n<p>The legendary American investor was worth $100 billion on Thursday, according to the&nbsp;Bloomberg Billionaire's Index. That puts him in the company of just five other men above that threshold. And he's now the sixth richest person in the world, ranking just behindFacebook(FB)CEO Mark&nbsp;Zuckerberg.</p>\n<p>The 90-year-old&nbsp;Buffett&nbsp;has added nearly $13 billion to his net worth this year as shares in his industrial and insurance conglomerate have surged.Berkshire Hathaway(BRKA)is up nearly 15% in 2021, giving the company a market capitalization of more than $600 billion.</p>\n<p>Buffett and Berkshire Hathaway are famous for investing primarily in slow growth, \"value\" stocks — many of which have done very well this year as markets continue to recover from the pandemic-fueled crash a year ago. He recently revealed that Berkshire&nbsp;bought stakes in Dow components&nbsp;Chevron and Verizon, indicating a new interest in Big Oil, telecom and media.</p>\n<p>Chevron(CVX)is up 31% as&nbsp;crude prices recover the ground they lost&nbsp;during the early months of the pandemic.Verizon(VZ)&nbsp;hasn't fared nearly as well — the stock is down nearly 3% this year — but it's still above the lows it hit in March 2020.</p>\n<p>While Buffett has cracked the $100 billion mark, he's still a long way behind the world's richest person,Amazon(AMZN)CEO Jeff Bezos, who is worth $180 billion, according to Bloomberg. Bezos has been trading the title withTesla(TSLA)CEO Elon Musk, who's now worth $173 billion&nbsp;as shares in his electric carmaker rallyfrom recent losses.</p>\n<p>Microsoft(MSFT)co-founder Bill Gates is No. 3 on the list at $138 billion, while Bernard Arnault, the chairman of luxury goods groupLVMH(LVMHF), ranks No. 4 with $122 billion. Arnault is the wealthiest non-American on the list. Zuckerberg is No. 5 with a net worth of $101 billion.Buffett has donated billions of dollars to philanthropic causes, and in 2006, pledged to give away&nbsp;almost all of his fortune to charity.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Warren Buffett is now worth $100 billion</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWarren Buffett is now worth $100 billion\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-03-11 23:26 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://edition.cnn.com/2021/03/11/business/warren-buffett-net-worth-intl-hnk/index.html><strong>CNN Business</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>New York/Hong Kong (CNN Business) - Warren Buffett has just joined the world's most exclusive club of the mega rich.\nThe legendary American investor was worth $100 billion on Thursday, according to ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://edition.cnn.com/2021/03/11/business/warren-buffett-net-worth-intl-hnk/index.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BRK.A":"伯克希尔","BRK.B":"伯克希尔B"},"source_url":"https://edition.cnn.com/2021/03/11/business/warren-buffett-net-worth-intl-hnk/index.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1119544264","content_text":"New York/Hong Kong (CNN Business) - Warren Buffett has just joined the world's most exclusive club of the mega rich.\nThe legendary American investor was worth $100 billion on Thursday, according to the Bloomberg Billionaire's Index. That puts him in the company of just five other men above that threshold. And he's now the sixth richest person in the world, ranking just behindFacebook(FB)CEO Mark Zuckerberg.\nThe 90-year-old Buffett has added nearly $13 billion to his net worth this year as shares in his industrial and insurance conglomerate have surged.Berkshire Hathaway(BRKA)is up nearly 15% in 2021, giving the company a market capitalization of more than $600 billion.\nBuffett and Berkshire Hathaway are famous for investing primarily in slow growth, \"value\" stocks — many of which have done very well this year as markets continue to recover from the pandemic-fueled crash a year ago. He recently revealed that Berkshire bought stakes in Dow components Chevron and Verizon, indicating a new interest in Big Oil, telecom and media.\nChevron(CVX)is up 31% as crude prices recover the ground they lost during the early months of the pandemic.Verizon(VZ) hasn't fared nearly as well — the stock is down nearly 3% this year — but it's still above the lows it hit in March 2020.\nWhile Buffett has cracked the $100 billion mark, he's still a long way behind the world's richest person,Amazon(AMZN)CEO Jeff Bezos, who is worth $180 billion, according to Bloomberg. Bezos has been trading the title withTesla(TSLA)CEO Elon Musk, who's now worth $173 billion as shares in his electric carmaker rallyfrom recent losses.\nMicrosoft(MSFT)co-founder Bill Gates is No. 3 on the list at $138 billion, while Bernard Arnault, the chairman of luxury goods groupLVMH(LVMHF), ranks No. 4 with $122 billion. Arnault is the wealthiest non-American on the list. Zuckerberg is No. 5 with a net worth of $101 billion.Buffett has donated billions of dollars to philanthropic causes, and in 2006, pledged to give away almost all of his fortune to charity.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":424,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":367202321,"gmtCreate":1614951465963,"gmtModify":1704777359040,"author":{"id":"3561847149000384","authorId":"3561847149000384","name":"Treeshaker","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/decf8e441d973187eb27d732a59be17d","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3561847149000384","authorIdStr":"3561847149000384"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Oil up pls.&nbsp;","listText":"Oil up pls.&nbsp;","text":"Oil up pls.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/367202321","repostId":"1183926967","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1183926967","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"为用户提供金融资讯、行情、数据，旨在帮助投资者理解世界，做投资决策。","home_visible":1,"media_name":"老虎资讯综合","id":"102","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1614951176,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1183926967?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-03-05 21:32","market":"us","language":"en","title":"U.S. added 379,000 jobs in February, better than expected","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1183926967","media":"老虎资讯综合","summary":"(March 5) The U.S. economy added back more jobs in February than in January, as easing COVID-19 case","content":"<p>(March 5)&nbsp;The U.S. economy added back more jobs in February than in January, as easing COVID-19 case counts and a ramping vaccine rollout allowed distancing restrictions to begin to moderate.</p><p>The U.S. Labor Department released its February jobs report Friday morning at 8:30 a.m. ET. Here were the main metrics from the report, compared to consensus estimates compiled by Bloomberg:</p><ul><li><b>Non-farm payrolls: +379,000</b>&nbsp;vs. +200,000 expected and +49,000 in January</li><li><b>Unemployment rate:</b>&nbsp;6.2% vs. 6.3% expected and 6.3% in January</li><li><b>Average hourly earnings, month-over-month</b>: 0.2% vs. 0.2% expected and 0.2% in January</li><li><b>Average hourly earnings, year-over-year</b>: 5.3% vs. 5.3% expected and 5.4% in January</li></ul><p>The February jobs report comes on the heels of back-to-back disappointments in each of the January and December reports. The economy added atepid 49,000 payrolls in January,according to the unrevised print, and had lost payrolls on net for the first time since Aprilin December.Overall, the U.S. economy remains about 9.9 million payrolls short of its pre-pandemic levels.</p><p>But last month, job growth was expected to have accelerated as declining new COVID-19 cases and broadening vaccine-conferred immunity helped more businesses reopen with greater capacity. The unemployment rate was expected to hold at 6.3%, or well below the pandemic-era high of 14.8%, but still above the 50-year-low of 3.5% from February 2020.</p><p>The breakdown of job gains and declines by industry was set to be of particular interest in the latest jobs report, given that job losses during the pandemic have been so heavily concentrated in high-contact services industries, and especially at restaurants, bars, hotels and their ilk.</p><p>In December and January,service-related jobs bore the brunt of payroll declines, as a resurgence in new COVID-19 cases around the holidays led to renewed social distancing restrictions. Leisure and hospitality payrolls dropped by 61,000 in January, following a plunge of more than half a million in December. But these losses may have at least begun to soften in February.</p><p>\"As the pace of new COVID-19 cases steadily declined, restaurant activity accelerated in February, suggesting an increase in food service employment,\" Nomura chief economist Lewis Alexander said in a note on Wednesday. \"That strength continued into March based on preliminary data, consistent with our view that private employment growth should begin to recover more rapidly in the late spring as vaccinations continue and restrictions are eased.\"</p><p>Some other temporary factors may have added pressure to the labor market in February, including the inclement weather that blanketed much of the country mid-month. This may cause some unevenness in the data reported in the Labor Department's monthly household survey, which includes the unemployment rate, and establishment survey, which includes the change in non-farm payrolls, some economists noted.</p><p>\"Colder than usual weather in February likely weighed on certain sectors, including construction, retail and food services,\" Morgan Stanley economist Ellen Zentner wrote in a note Wednesday. \"This may have differentiated effects on the household and establishment sides of the report — whether they are employed, but 'not at work due to weather' in the household survey, or if they missed paychecks then that would also be reflected in the establishment survey.\"</p><p>Other reports on the U.S. labor market have come in mixed recently.ADP reported Wednesday that private payrolls increased by just 117,000in February, sharply missing estimates for a rise of 205,000 payrolls. But elsewhere,weekly jobless claims trended lower in Februaryversus January, suggesting a moderation in the number of newly unemployed.Plus, the Conference Board's labor differential— measuring the percentage of those saying jobs are \"plentiful\" subtracted by those claiming jobs are \"hard to get\" — turned positive for the first time since November in February.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>U.S. added 379,000 jobs in February, better than expected</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nU.S. added 379,000 jobs in February, better than expected\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/102\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">老虎资讯综合 </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-03-05 21:32</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>(March 5)&nbsp;The U.S. economy added back more jobs in February than in January, as easing COVID-19 case counts and a ramping vaccine rollout allowed distancing restrictions to begin to moderate.</p><p>The U.S. Labor Department released its February jobs report Friday morning at 8:30 a.m. ET. Here were the main metrics from the report, compared to consensus estimates compiled by Bloomberg:</p><ul><li><b>Non-farm payrolls: +379,000</b>&nbsp;vs. +200,000 expected and +49,000 in January</li><li><b>Unemployment rate:</b>&nbsp;6.2% vs. 6.3% expected and 6.3% in January</li><li><b>Average hourly earnings, month-over-month</b>: 0.2% vs. 0.2% expected and 0.2% in January</li><li><b>Average hourly earnings, year-over-year</b>: 5.3% vs. 5.3% expected and 5.4% in January</li></ul><p>The February jobs report comes on the heels of back-to-back disappointments in each of the January and December reports. The economy added atepid 49,000 payrolls in January,according to the unrevised print, and had lost payrolls on net for the first time since Aprilin December.Overall, the U.S. economy remains about 9.9 million payrolls short of its pre-pandemic levels.</p><p>But last month, job growth was expected to have accelerated as declining new COVID-19 cases and broadening vaccine-conferred immunity helped more businesses reopen with greater capacity. The unemployment rate was expected to hold at 6.3%, or well below the pandemic-era high of 14.8%, but still above the 50-year-low of 3.5% from February 2020.</p><p>The breakdown of job gains and declines by industry was set to be of particular interest in the latest jobs report, given that job losses during the pandemic have been so heavily concentrated in high-contact services industries, and especially at restaurants, bars, hotels and their ilk.</p><p>In December and January,service-related jobs bore the brunt of payroll declines, as a resurgence in new COVID-19 cases around the holidays led to renewed social distancing restrictions. Leisure and hospitality payrolls dropped by 61,000 in January, following a plunge of more than half a million in December. But these losses may have at least begun to soften in February.</p><p>\"As the pace of new COVID-19 cases steadily declined, restaurant activity accelerated in February, suggesting an increase in food service employment,\" Nomura chief economist Lewis Alexander said in a note on Wednesday. \"That strength continued into March based on preliminary data, consistent with our view that private employment growth should begin to recover more rapidly in the late spring as vaccinations continue and restrictions are eased.\"</p><p>Some other temporary factors may have added pressure to the labor market in February, including the inclement weather that blanketed much of the country mid-month. This may cause some unevenness in the data reported in the Labor Department's monthly household survey, which includes the unemployment rate, and establishment survey, which includes the change in non-farm payrolls, some economists noted.</p><p>\"Colder than usual weather in February likely weighed on certain sectors, including construction, retail and food services,\" Morgan Stanley economist Ellen Zentner wrote in a note Wednesday. \"This may have differentiated effects on the household and establishment sides of the report — whether they are employed, but 'not at work due to weather' in the household survey, or if they missed paychecks then that would also be reflected in the establishment survey.\"</p><p>Other reports on the U.S. labor market have come in mixed recently.ADP reported Wednesday that private payrolls increased by just 117,000in February, sharply missing estimates for a rise of 205,000 payrolls. But elsewhere,weekly jobless claims trended lower in Februaryversus January, suggesting a moderation in the number of newly unemployed.Plus, the Conference Board's labor differential— measuring the percentage of those saying jobs are \"plentiful\" subtracted by those claiming jobs are \"hard to get\" — turned positive for the first time since November in February.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/67ddaab67c271192b52371b38356b471","relate_stocks":{"SPY":"标普500ETF"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1183926967","content_text":"(March 5) The U.S. economy added back more jobs in February than in January, as easing COVID-19 case counts and a ramping vaccine rollout allowed distancing restrictions to begin to moderate.The U.S. Labor Department released its February jobs report Friday morning at 8:30 a.m. ET. Here were the main metrics from the report, compared to consensus estimates compiled by Bloomberg:Non-farm payrolls: +379,000 vs. +200,000 expected and +49,000 in JanuaryUnemployment rate: 6.2% vs. 6.3% expected and 6.3% in JanuaryAverage hourly earnings, month-over-month: 0.2% vs. 0.2% expected and 0.2% in JanuaryAverage hourly earnings, year-over-year: 5.3% vs. 5.3% expected and 5.4% in JanuaryThe February jobs report comes on the heels of back-to-back disappointments in each of the January and December reports. The economy added atepid 49,000 payrolls in January,according to the unrevised print, and had lost payrolls on net for the first time since Aprilin December.Overall, the U.S. economy remains about 9.9 million payrolls short of its pre-pandemic levels.But last month, job growth was expected to have accelerated as declining new COVID-19 cases and broadening vaccine-conferred immunity helped more businesses reopen with greater capacity. The unemployment rate was expected to hold at 6.3%, or well below the pandemic-era high of 14.8%, but still above the 50-year-low of 3.5% from February 2020.The breakdown of job gains and declines by industry was set to be of particular interest in the latest jobs report, given that job losses during the pandemic have been so heavily concentrated in high-contact services industries, and especially at restaurants, bars, hotels and their ilk.In December and January,service-related jobs bore the brunt of payroll declines, as a resurgence in new COVID-19 cases around the holidays led to renewed social distancing restrictions. Leisure and hospitality payrolls dropped by 61,000 in January, following a plunge of more than half a million in December. But these losses may have at least begun to soften in February.\"As the pace of new COVID-19 cases steadily declined, restaurant activity accelerated in February, suggesting an increase in food service employment,\" Nomura chief economist Lewis Alexander said in a note on Wednesday. \"That strength continued into March based on preliminary data, consistent with our view that private employment growth should begin to recover more rapidly in the late spring as vaccinations continue and restrictions are eased.\"Some other temporary factors may have added pressure to the labor market in February, including the inclement weather that blanketed much of the country mid-month. This may cause some unevenness in the data reported in the Labor Department's monthly household survey, which includes the unemployment rate, and establishment survey, which includes the change in non-farm payrolls, some economists noted.\"Colder than usual weather in February likely weighed on certain sectors, including construction, retail and food services,\" Morgan Stanley economist Ellen Zentner wrote in a note Wednesday. \"This may have differentiated effects on the household and establishment sides of the report — whether they are employed, but 'not at work due to weather' in the household survey, or if they missed paychecks then that would also be reflected in the establishment survey.\"Other reports on the U.S. labor market have come in mixed recently.ADP reported Wednesday that private payrolls increased by just 117,000in February, sharply missing estimates for a rise of 205,000 payrolls. But elsewhere,weekly jobless claims trended lower in Februaryversus January, suggesting a moderation in the number of newly unemployed.Plus, the Conference Board's labor differential— measuring the percentage of those saying jobs are \"plentiful\" subtracted by those claiming jobs are \"hard to get\" — turned positive for the first time since November in February.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":407,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":363406884,"gmtCreate":1614160581948,"gmtModify":1704888881059,"author":{"id":"3561847149000384","authorId":"3561847149000384","name":"Treeshaker","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/decf8e441d973187eb27d732a59be17d","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3561847149000384","authorIdStr":"3561847149000384"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Oh dear. Take the tiger coins then.&nbsp;","listText":"Oh dear. Take the tiger coins then.&nbsp;","text":"Oh dear. Take the tiger coins then.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/363406884","repostId":"1197533827","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1197533827","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1614160523,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1197533827?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-02-24 17:55","market":"us","language":"en","title":"The days of easy money in the stock market are now over","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1197533827","media":"MarketWatch","summary":"Get ready for a return to normal. Lucid’s SPAC and ARK Invest’s ETFs carry the whiff of the late-199","content":"<p>Get ready for a return to normal. Lucid’s SPAC and ARK Invest’s ETFs carry the whiff of the late-1990s technology bubble.</p>\n<p>Ignore stock valuations and companies’ fundamentals at your peril.</p>\n<p>Churchill Capital Corp. ,a special purpose acquisition company (SPAC) that had been rumored to merge with a Tesla-wannabe, Lucid Motors, finally announced Monday night that it is indeed going to do so. And in a classic Wall Street reaction, the market “sold the news” after long having “bought the rumor.”</p>\n<p>CCIV was up 500% from when it went public as a blank-check company, and today the stock market has wiped half of what its market value was perceived to be Monday at noon. This is a stock that I had warned about earlier this month as one of the many “Random Number Generators” (RNGs) that should be avoided. People and institutions who had for weeks been buying CCIV at $40, $50, $60 or even $70 per share have suddenly seen a huge wipeout of value.</p>\n<p>They’re now, maybe, looking around at their other RNG SPACs and wondering if they should actually look at the valuations.</p>\n<p>Reviewing this week’s ugly stock-market action in a broader context, you might note that Tesla Inc.&nbsp;at $900 — after the company reported a not-so-great quarter that included some questions about gross margin expansion — is looking like it could have been a top-maker itself.</p>\n<p>Many questionable EV stocks continued to rally for a week or two before getting their comeuppance this week. At least for a day or two. It will be interesting to look back in a month to see what the non-TSLA EV stocks do from here. I expect most to move much lower even than today’s quotes, which are much lower than last week’s quotes.</p>\n<p><b>Piling into ARK</b></p>\n<p>These days everybody wants to be Cathie Wood from ARK Invest. She was an early bull on Tesla and bitcoinBTCUSD,6.03%and some of the the other themes that long-time followers of mine and I got into even earlier than she did. Her actively managed ETF, ARK Innovation ETF&nbsp;being the most famous, has performed very well, and her commentary has been spot on for a couple years now.</p>\n<p>But I have bad news. Even as I am a fan of Cathie’s and wish her and her investors all the best, I can’t help but think of the story of George Gilder, with whom I’ve become friends in the decades since&nbsp;I wrote this in 2001 for TheStreet.com.&nbsp;(I just realized this article was published just two weeks after 9/11.):</p>\n<p><i>“Investors need to heed a few rules when evaluating companies in their portfolio: Cash is king, as cash flow becomes increasingly difficult to judge on an ongoing basis. As such, a simple glance at a company’s balance sheet can tell you a lot about whether it’s worthy of investment. Now that the huge daily run-ups of telco stocks are gone forever, the potential rewards of any business with questionable viability aren’t worth the risk of your capital. Look for real revenue on the books. As tech guru George Gilder and his followers have learned (at least, I hope they have by now), great technology doesn’t translate into a great investment. Companies need sales channels, and they need products for which there are immediate uses. You might be surprised that I didn’t mention profitability in that list. Profitability is naturally important, but even companies like Cisco probably won’t be profitable this quarter and perhaps for several more, as they’ll have to continue aligning capacity, employees and inventory with demand.</i></p>\n<p><i>Let me repeat the caveat here: You’ll never see the type of returns, at least in telecom and telecom-tech stocks, that we saw almost daily in the late 1990s. That’s another reason why these tech mutual fund guys, who keep preaching to stay the course, will take forever to get back to even.”</i></p>\n<p><b>The hangover</b></p>\n<p>Telecom and telecom-tech stocks never again saw the kind of returns they did back in the late 1990s. I think the same can be said of EV stocks and many other of the favorites that Cathie Wood and her crowd of blind followers are these days plowing into as they put their money to work regardless of valuations.</p>\n<p>Here’s what George had to say&nbsp;in 2002:</p>\n<p><i>“In retrospect, it’s obvious that I should’ve subtly said, ‘Hey, things have gotten out of hand at JDS Uniphase, and it’s not worth what you’d have to pay for it,’” he says. Each month, he thought about providing a warning to his subscribers, and he decided against it every time. He had witnessed firsthand what others had dubbed the “Gilder effect”: the steep spike in a stock after he added that company to his list. It wasn’t unheard of for the price of a stock to jump by more than 50 percent within an hour of a newsletter’s release. If I had said, ‘Hey, this is a top, you should all sell,’ it would’ve been a cataclysmic event,” he says. “I’d think about telling people that they should sell half their holdings, and each time I’d conclude that my subscribers would be enraged. I also wondered what I’d precipitate if I did it.” Fully 50 percent of his readers had signed up for the report at what Gilder now calls the “hysterical peak” of the market. “Half of my subscribers would have been eternally grateful [for a warning], but the other half – the new ones – would’ve been enraged because they had just come in,” he says. “It was quite terrifying. I really didn’t know what to do.” In the end he did nothing. And soon enough, he had an entirely new set of distractions to fret over. “In the past, we’d sell out our investor conferences within two weeks,” Gilder says. “But in 2001, we sent out the same literature and the same invitations, and five or seven people signed up.” He lost the deposits that were placed to reserve hotel space for the gatherings. Newsletter renewal rates plummeted. A huge tax bill came due. By spring 2002, he’d laid off nearly half of his staff. “You can be just fabulously flush one moment, and then the next, you can’t make that last million-dollar payment to your partners, and there’s suddenly a lien on your house,” he says.</i></p>\n<p>Many of the best stocks on George’s list at the top in 1999 ended up going down 99% or more. Many went to zero, even as their technologies and ideas carried on and built the internet we all use every day now.</p>\n<p>CCIV is likely a harbinger of more pain for those who ignore valuations and fundamentals.</p>","source":"market_watch","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>The days of easy money in the stock market are now over</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nThe days of easy money in the stock market are now over\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-02-24 17:55 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.marketwatch.com/story/the-days-of-easy-money-in-the-stock-market-are-now-over-11614104263?mod=home-page><strong>MarketWatch</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Get ready for a return to normal. Lucid’s SPAC and ARK Invest’s ETFs carry the whiff of the late-1990s technology bubble.\nIgnore stock valuations and companies’ fundamentals at your peril.\nChurchill ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/the-days-of-easy-money-in-the-stock-market-are-now-over-11614104263?mod=home-page\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".DJI":"道琼斯","TSLA":"特斯拉","ARKK":"ARK Innovation ETF",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index"},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/the-days-of-easy-money-in-the-stock-market-are-now-over-11614104263?mod=home-page","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/599a65733b8245fcf7868668ef9ad712","article_id":"1197533827","content_text":"Get ready for a return to normal. Lucid’s SPAC and ARK Invest’s ETFs carry the whiff of the late-1990s technology bubble.\nIgnore stock valuations and companies’ fundamentals at your peril.\nChurchill Capital Corp. ,a special purpose acquisition company (SPAC) that had been rumored to merge with a Tesla-wannabe, Lucid Motors, finally announced Monday night that it is indeed going to do so. And in a classic Wall Street reaction, the market “sold the news” after long having “bought the rumor.”\nCCIV was up 500% from when it went public as a blank-check company, and today the stock market has wiped half of what its market value was perceived to be Monday at noon. This is a stock that I had warned about earlier this month as one of the many “Random Number Generators” (RNGs) that should be avoided. People and institutions who had for weeks been buying CCIV at $40, $50, $60 or even $70 per share have suddenly seen a huge wipeout of value.\nThey’re now, maybe, looking around at their other RNG SPACs and wondering if they should actually look at the valuations.\nReviewing this week’s ugly stock-market action in a broader context, you might note that Tesla Inc. at $900 — after the company reported a not-so-great quarter that included some questions about gross margin expansion — is looking like it could have been a top-maker itself.\nMany questionable EV stocks continued to rally for a week or two before getting their comeuppance this week. At least for a day or two. It will be interesting to look back in a month to see what the non-TSLA EV stocks do from here. I expect most to move much lower even than today’s quotes, which are much lower than last week’s quotes.\nPiling into ARK\nThese days everybody wants to be Cathie Wood from ARK Invest. She was an early bull on Tesla and bitcoinBTCUSD,6.03%and some of the the other themes that long-time followers of mine and I got into even earlier than she did. Her actively managed ETF, ARK Innovation ETF being the most famous, has performed very well, and her commentary has been spot on for a couple years now.\nBut I have bad news. Even as I am a fan of Cathie’s and wish her and her investors all the best, I can’t help but think of the story of George Gilder, with whom I’ve become friends in the decades since I wrote this in 2001 for TheStreet.com. (I just realized this article was published just two weeks after 9/11.):\n“Investors need to heed a few rules when evaluating companies in their portfolio: Cash is king, as cash flow becomes increasingly difficult to judge on an ongoing basis. As such, a simple glance at a company’s balance sheet can tell you a lot about whether it’s worthy of investment. Now that the huge daily run-ups of telco stocks are gone forever, the potential rewards of any business with questionable viability aren’t worth the risk of your capital. Look for real revenue on the books. As tech guru George Gilder and his followers have learned (at least, I hope they have by now), great technology doesn’t translate into a great investment. Companies need sales channels, and they need products for which there are immediate uses. You might be surprised that I didn’t mention profitability in that list. Profitability is naturally important, but even companies like Cisco probably won’t be profitable this quarter and perhaps for several more, as they’ll have to continue aligning capacity, employees and inventory with demand.\nLet me repeat the caveat here: You’ll never see the type of returns, at least in telecom and telecom-tech stocks, that we saw almost daily in the late 1990s. That’s another reason why these tech mutual fund guys, who keep preaching to stay the course, will take forever to get back to even.”\nThe hangover\nTelecom and telecom-tech stocks never again saw the kind of returns they did back in the late 1990s. I think the same can be said of EV stocks and many other of the favorites that Cathie Wood and her crowd of blind followers are these days plowing into as they put their money to work regardless of valuations.\nHere’s what George had to say in 2002:\n“In retrospect, it’s obvious that I should’ve subtly said, ‘Hey, things have gotten out of hand at JDS Uniphase, and it’s not worth what you’d have to pay for it,’” he says. Each month, he thought about providing a warning to his subscribers, and he decided against it every time. He had witnessed firsthand what others had dubbed the “Gilder effect”: the steep spike in a stock after he added that company to his list. It wasn’t unheard of for the price of a stock to jump by more than 50 percent within an hour of a newsletter’s release. If I had said, ‘Hey, this is a top, you should all sell,’ it would’ve been a cataclysmic event,” he says. “I’d think about telling people that they should sell half their holdings, and each time I’d conclude that my subscribers would be enraged. I also wondered what I’d precipitate if I did it.” Fully 50 percent of his readers had signed up for the report at what Gilder now calls the “hysterical peak” of the market. “Half of my subscribers would have been eternally grateful [for a warning], but the other half – the new ones – would’ve been enraged because they had just come in,” he says. “It was quite terrifying. I really didn’t know what to do.” In the end he did nothing. And soon enough, he had an entirely new set of distractions to fret over. “In the past, we’d sell out our investor conferences within two weeks,” Gilder says. “But in 2001, we sent out the same literature and the same invitations, and five or seven people signed up.” He lost the deposits that were placed to reserve hotel space for the gatherings. Newsletter renewal rates plummeted. A huge tax bill came due. By spring 2002, he’d laid off nearly half of his staff. “You can be just fabulously flush one moment, and then the next, you can’t make that last million-dollar payment to your partners, and there’s suddenly a lien on your house,” he says.\nMany of the best stocks on George’s list at the top in 1999 ended up going down 99% or more. Many went to zero, even as their technologies and ideas carried on and built the internet we all use every day now.\nCCIV is likely a harbinger of more pain for those who ignore valuations and fundamentals.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":440,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":387542730,"gmtCreate":1613761351020,"gmtModify":1704884797037,"author":{"id":"3561847149000384","authorId":"3561847149000384","name":"Treeshaker","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/decf8e441d973187eb27d732a59be17d","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3561847149000384","authorIdStr":"3561847149000384"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Wow.&nbsp;","listText":"Wow.&nbsp;","text":"Wow.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/387542730","repostId":"1194607255","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1194607255","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1613728971,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1194607255?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-02-19 18:02","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Uber drivers should be classified as workers not independent contractors, top UK court rules","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1194607255","media":"cnbc","summary":"LONDON —Uberlost a crucial legal fight in the U.K. on Friday, as the country's Supreme Court upheld ","content":"<div>\n<p>LONDON —Uberlost a crucial legal fight in the U.K. on Friday, as the country's Supreme Court upheld a ruling that its drivers should be classified as workers rather than independent contractors.\nThe ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/02/19/uk-supreme-court-rules-uber-drivers-are-workers-not-contractors.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"cnbc_highlight","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Uber drivers should be classified as workers not independent contractors, top UK court rules</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nUber drivers should be classified as workers not independent contractors, top UK court rules\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-02-19 18:02 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.cnbc.com/2021/02/19/uk-supreme-court-rules-uber-drivers-are-workers-not-contractors.html><strong>cnbc</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>LONDON —Uberlost a crucial legal fight in the U.K. on Friday, as the country's Supreme Court upheld a ruling that its drivers should be classified as workers rather than independent contractors.\nThe ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/02/19/uk-supreme-court-rules-uber-drivers-are-workers-not-contractors.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"UBER":"优步"},"source_url":"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/02/19/uk-supreme-court-rules-uber-drivers-are-workers-not-contractors.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/72bb72e1b84c09fca865c6dcb1bbcd16","article_id":"1194607255","content_text":"LONDON —Uberlost a crucial legal fight in the U.K. on Friday, as the country's Supreme Court upheld a ruling that its drivers should be classified as workers rather than independent contractors.\nThe verdict concludes an almost five-year legal battle between Uber and a group of former drivers who claim they were workers entitled to employment rights like a minimum wage, holiday pay and rest breaks.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":185,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":330286996,"gmtCreate":1608630694015,"gmtModify":1704975601790,"author":{"id":"3561847149000384","authorId":"3561847149000384","name":"Treeshaker","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/decf8e441d973187eb27d732a59be17d","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3561847149000384","authorIdStr":"3561847149000384"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BPT\">$BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty(BPT)$</a>Wah. If i am US&nbsp;tax residence. With same level of dividends, i canbreakeven within 3 years.&nbsp;","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BPT\">$BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty(BPT)$</a>Wah. If i am US&nbsp;tax residence. With same level of dividends, i canbreakeven within 3 years.&nbsp;","text":"$BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty(BPT)$Wah. If i am US tax residence. With same level of dividends, i canbreakeven within 3 years.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/330286996","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":752,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[{"author":{"id":"3527667803686145","authorId":"3527667803686145","name":"社区成长助手","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2b7c7106b5c0c8b0037faa67439d898f","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3527667803686145","authorIdStr":"3527667803686145"},"content":"Finally, when your initial post [Bixin] [Bixin] comes, I hope you can have a good time and earn a good time in Tiger Community! If you want to create high-quality articles, please checkGuidelines for Tiger Community Creation","text":"Finally, when your initial post [Bixin] [Bixin] comes, I hope you can have a good time and earn a good time in Tiger Community! If you want to create high-quality articles, please checkGuidelines for Tiger Community Creation","html":"Finally, when your initial post [Bixin] [Bixin] comes, I hope you can have a good time and earn a good time in Tiger Community! If you want to create high-quality articles, please checkGuidelines for Tiger Community Creation"}],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":9037100559,"gmtCreate":1648043969260,"gmtModify":1676534296249,"author":{"id":"3561847149000384","authorId":"3561847149000384","name":"Treeshaker","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/decf8e441d973187eb27d732a59be17d","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3561847149000384","authorIdStr":"3561847149000384"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/MOGO\">$Mogo Finance Technology Inc.(MOGO)$</a>Viable business.&nbsp;So much cash. Announces to buy back.Can try.&nbsp;","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/MOGO\">$Mogo Finance Technology Inc.(MOGO)$</a>Viable business.&nbsp;So much cash. Announces to buy back.Can try.&nbsp;","text":"$Mogo Finance Technology Inc.(MOGO)$Viable business. So much cash. Announces to buy back.Can try.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9037100559","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":518,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":363406884,"gmtCreate":1614160581948,"gmtModify":1704888881059,"author":{"id":"3561847149000384","authorId":"3561847149000384","name":"Treeshaker","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/decf8e441d973187eb27d732a59be17d","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3561847149000384","authorIdStr":"3561847149000384"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Oh dear. Take the tiger coins then.&nbsp;","listText":"Oh dear. Take the tiger coins then.&nbsp;","text":"Oh dear. Take the tiger coins then.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/363406884","repostId":"1197533827","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1197533827","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1614160523,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1197533827?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-02-24 17:55","market":"us","language":"en","title":"The days of easy money in the stock market are now over","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1197533827","media":"MarketWatch","summary":"Get ready for a return to normal. Lucid’s SPAC and ARK Invest’s ETFs carry the whiff of the late-199","content":"<p>Get ready for a return to normal. Lucid’s SPAC and ARK Invest’s ETFs carry the whiff of the late-1990s technology bubble.</p>\n<p>Ignore stock valuations and companies’ fundamentals at your peril.</p>\n<p>Churchill Capital Corp. ,a special purpose acquisition company (SPAC) that had been rumored to merge with a Tesla-wannabe, Lucid Motors, finally announced Monday night that it is indeed going to do so. And in a classic Wall Street reaction, the market “sold the news” after long having “bought the rumor.”</p>\n<p>CCIV was up 500% from when it went public as a blank-check company, and today the stock market has wiped half of what its market value was perceived to be Monday at noon. This is a stock that I had warned about earlier this month as one of the many “Random Number Generators” (RNGs) that should be avoided. People and institutions who had for weeks been buying CCIV at $40, $50, $60 or even $70 per share have suddenly seen a huge wipeout of value.</p>\n<p>They’re now, maybe, looking around at their other RNG SPACs and wondering if they should actually look at the valuations.</p>\n<p>Reviewing this week’s ugly stock-market action in a broader context, you might note that Tesla Inc.&nbsp;at $900 — after the company reported a not-so-great quarter that included some questions about gross margin expansion — is looking like it could have been a top-maker itself.</p>\n<p>Many questionable EV stocks continued to rally for a week or two before getting their comeuppance this week. At least for a day or two. It will be interesting to look back in a month to see what the non-TSLA EV stocks do from here. I expect most to move much lower even than today’s quotes, which are much lower than last week’s quotes.</p>\n<p><b>Piling into ARK</b></p>\n<p>These days everybody wants to be Cathie Wood from ARK Invest. She was an early bull on Tesla and bitcoinBTCUSD,6.03%and some of the the other themes that long-time followers of mine and I got into even earlier than she did. Her actively managed ETF, ARK Innovation ETF&nbsp;being the most famous, has performed very well, and her commentary has been spot on for a couple years now.</p>\n<p>But I have bad news. Even as I am a fan of Cathie’s and wish her and her investors all the best, I can’t help but think of the story of George Gilder, with whom I’ve become friends in the decades since&nbsp;I wrote this in 2001 for TheStreet.com.&nbsp;(I just realized this article was published just two weeks after 9/11.):</p>\n<p><i>“Investors need to heed a few rules when evaluating companies in their portfolio: Cash is king, as cash flow becomes increasingly difficult to judge on an ongoing basis. As such, a simple glance at a company’s balance sheet can tell you a lot about whether it’s worthy of investment. Now that the huge daily run-ups of telco stocks are gone forever, the potential rewards of any business with questionable viability aren’t worth the risk of your capital. Look for real revenue on the books. As tech guru George Gilder and his followers have learned (at least, I hope they have by now), great technology doesn’t translate into a great investment. Companies need sales channels, and they need products for which there are immediate uses. You might be surprised that I didn’t mention profitability in that list. Profitability is naturally important, but even companies like Cisco probably won’t be profitable this quarter and perhaps for several more, as they’ll have to continue aligning capacity, employees and inventory with demand.</i></p>\n<p><i>Let me repeat the caveat here: You’ll never see the type of returns, at least in telecom and telecom-tech stocks, that we saw almost daily in the late 1990s. That’s another reason why these tech mutual fund guys, who keep preaching to stay the course, will take forever to get back to even.”</i></p>\n<p><b>The hangover</b></p>\n<p>Telecom and telecom-tech stocks never again saw the kind of returns they did back in the late 1990s. I think the same can be said of EV stocks and many other of the favorites that Cathie Wood and her crowd of blind followers are these days plowing into as they put their money to work regardless of valuations.</p>\n<p>Here’s what George had to say&nbsp;in 2002:</p>\n<p><i>“In retrospect, it’s obvious that I should’ve subtly said, ‘Hey, things have gotten out of hand at JDS Uniphase, and it’s not worth what you’d have to pay for it,’” he says. Each month, he thought about providing a warning to his subscribers, and he decided against it every time. He had witnessed firsthand what others had dubbed the “Gilder effect”: the steep spike in a stock after he added that company to his list. It wasn’t unheard of for the price of a stock to jump by more than 50 percent within an hour of a newsletter’s release. If I had said, ‘Hey, this is a top, you should all sell,’ it would’ve been a cataclysmic event,” he says. “I’d think about telling people that they should sell half their holdings, and each time I’d conclude that my subscribers would be enraged. I also wondered what I’d precipitate if I did it.” Fully 50 percent of his readers had signed up for the report at what Gilder now calls the “hysterical peak” of the market. “Half of my subscribers would have been eternally grateful [for a warning], but the other half – the new ones – would’ve been enraged because they had just come in,” he says. “It was quite terrifying. I really didn’t know what to do.” In the end he did nothing. And soon enough, he had an entirely new set of distractions to fret over. “In the past, we’d sell out our investor conferences within two weeks,” Gilder says. “But in 2001, we sent out the same literature and the same invitations, and five or seven people signed up.” He lost the deposits that were placed to reserve hotel space for the gatherings. Newsletter renewal rates plummeted. A huge tax bill came due. By spring 2002, he’d laid off nearly half of his staff. “You can be just fabulously flush one moment, and then the next, you can’t make that last million-dollar payment to your partners, and there’s suddenly a lien on your house,” he says.</i></p>\n<p>Many of the best stocks on George’s list at the top in 1999 ended up going down 99% or more. Many went to zero, even as their technologies and ideas carried on and built the internet we all use every day now.</p>\n<p>CCIV is likely a harbinger of more pain for those who ignore valuations and fundamentals.</p>","source":"market_watch","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>The days of easy money in the stock market are now over</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nThe days of easy money in the stock market are now over\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-02-24 17:55 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.marketwatch.com/story/the-days-of-easy-money-in-the-stock-market-are-now-over-11614104263?mod=home-page><strong>MarketWatch</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Get ready for a return to normal. Lucid’s SPAC and ARK Invest’s ETFs carry the whiff of the late-1990s technology bubble.\nIgnore stock valuations and companies’ fundamentals at your peril.\nChurchill ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/the-days-of-easy-money-in-the-stock-market-are-now-over-11614104263?mod=home-page\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".DJI":"道琼斯","TSLA":"特斯拉","ARKK":"ARK Innovation ETF",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index"},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/the-days-of-easy-money-in-the-stock-market-are-now-over-11614104263?mod=home-page","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/599a65733b8245fcf7868668ef9ad712","article_id":"1197533827","content_text":"Get ready for a return to normal. Lucid’s SPAC and ARK Invest’s ETFs carry the whiff of the late-1990s technology bubble.\nIgnore stock valuations and companies’ fundamentals at your peril.\nChurchill Capital Corp. ,a special purpose acquisition company (SPAC) that had been rumored to merge with a Tesla-wannabe, Lucid Motors, finally announced Monday night that it is indeed going to do so. And in a classic Wall Street reaction, the market “sold the news” after long having “bought the rumor.”\nCCIV was up 500% from when it went public as a blank-check company, and today the stock market has wiped half of what its market value was perceived to be Monday at noon. This is a stock that I had warned about earlier this month as one of the many “Random Number Generators” (RNGs) that should be avoided. People and institutions who had for weeks been buying CCIV at $40, $50, $60 or even $70 per share have suddenly seen a huge wipeout of value.\nThey’re now, maybe, looking around at their other RNG SPACs and wondering if they should actually look at the valuations.\nReviewing this week’s ugly stock-market action in a broader context, you might note that Tesla Inc. at $900 — after the company reported a not-so-great quarter that included some questions about gross margin expansion — is looking like it could have been a top-maker itself.\nMany questionable EV stocks continued to rally for a week or two before getting their comeuppance this week. At least for a day or two. It will be interesting to look back in a month to see what the non-TSLA EV stocks do from here. I expect most to move much lower even than today’s quotes, which are much lower than last week’s quotes.\nPiling into ARK\nThese days everybody wants to be Cathie Wood from ARK Invest. She was an early bull on Tesla and bitcoinBTCUSD,6.03%and some of the the other themes that long-time followers of mine and I got into even earlier than she did. Her actively managed ETF, ARK Innovation ETF being the most famous, has performed very well, and her commentary has been spot on for a couple years now.\nBut I have bad news. Even as I am a fan of Cathie’s and wish her and her investors all the best, I can’t help but think of the story of George Gilder, with whom I’ve become friends in the decades since I wrote this in 2001 for TheStreet.com. (I just realized this article was published just two weeks after 9/11.):\n“Investors need to heed a few rules when evaluating companies in their portfolio: Cash is king, as cash flow becomes increasingly difficult to judge on an ongoing basis. As such, a simple glance at a company’s balance sheet can tell you a lot about whether it’s worthy of investment. Now that the huge daily run-ups of telco stocks are gone forever, the potential rewards of any business with questionable viability aren’t worth the risk of your capital. Look for real revenue on the books. As tech guru George Gilder and his followers have learned (at least, I hope they have by now), great technology doesn’t translate into a great investment. Companies need sales channels, and they need products for which there are immediate uses. You might be surprised that I didn’t mention profitability in that list. Profitability is naturally important, but even companies like Cisco probably won’t be profitable this quarter and perhaps for several more, as they’ll have to continue aligning capacity, employees and inventory with demand.\nLet me repeat the caveat here: You’ll never see the type of returns, at least in telecom and telecom-tech stocks, that we saw almost daily in the late 1990s. That’s another reason why these tech mutual fund guys, who keep preaching to stay the course, will take forever to get back to even.”\nThe hangover\nTelecom and telecom-tech stocks never again saw the kind of returns they did back in the late 1990s. I think the same can be said of EV stocks and many other of the favorites that Cathie Wood and her crowd of blind followers are these days plowing into as they put their money to work regardless of valuations.\nHere’s what George had to say in 2002:\n“In retrospect, it’s obvious that I should’ve subtly said, ‘Hey, things have gotten out of hand at JDS Uniphase, and it’s not worth what you’d have to pay for it,’” he says. Each month, he thought about providing a warning to his subscribers, and he decided against it every time. He had witnessed firsthand what others had dubbed the “Gilder effect”: the steep spike in a stock after he added that company to his list. It wasn’t unheard of for the price of a stock to jump by more than 50 percent within an hour of a newsletter’s release. If I had said, ‘Hey, this is a top, you should all sell,’ it would’ve been a cataclysmic event,” he says. “I’d think about telling people that they should sell half their holdings, and each time I’d conclude that my subscribers would be enraged. I also wondered what I’d precipitate if I did it.” Fully 50 percent of his readers had signed up for the report at what Gilder now calls the “hysterical peak” of the market. “Half of my subscribers would have been eternally grateful [for a warning], but the other half – the new ones – would’ve been enraged because they had just come in,” he says. “It was quite terrifying. I really didn’t know what to do.” In the end he did nothing. And soon enough, he had an entirely new set of distractions to fret over. “In the past, we’d sell out our investor conferences within two weeks,” Gilder says. “But in 2001, we sent out the same literature and the same invitations, and five or seven people signed up.” He lost the deposits that were placed to reserve hotel space for the gatherings. Newsletter renewal rates plummeted. A huge tax bill came due. By spring 2002, he’d laid off nearly half of his staff. “You can be just fabulously flush one moment, and then the next, you can’t make that last million-dollar payment to your partners, and there’s suddenly a lien on your house,” he says.\nMany of the best stocks on George’s list at the top in 1999 ended up going down 99% or more. Many went to zero, even as their technologies and ideas carried on and built the internet we all use every day now.\nCCIV is likely a harbinger of more pain for those who ignore valuations and fundamentals.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":440,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":330286996,"gmtCreate":1608630694015,"gmtModify":1704975601790,"author":{"id":"3561847149000384","authorId":"3561847149000384","name":"Treeshaker","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/decf8e441d973187eb27d732a59be17d","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3561847149000384","authorIdStr":"3561847149000384"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BPT\">$BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty(BPT)$</a>Wah. If i am US&nbsp;tax residence. With same level of dividends, i canbreakeven within 3 years.&nbsp;","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BPT\">$BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty(BPT)$</a>Wah. If i am US&nbsp;tax residence. With same level of dividends, i canbreakeven within 3 years.&nbsp;","text":"$BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty(BPT)$Wah. If i am US tax residence. With same level of dividends, i canbreakeven within 3 years.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/330286996","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":752,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[{"author":{"id":"3527667803686145","authorId":"3527667803686145","name":"社区成长助手","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2b7c7106b5c0c8b0037faa67439d898f","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3527667803686145","authorIdStr":"3527667803686145"},"content":"Finally, when your initial post [Bixin] [Bixin] comes, I hope you can have a good time and earn a good time in Tiger Community! If you want to create high-quality articles, please checkGuidelines for Tiger Community Creation","text":"Finally, when your initial post [Bixin] [Bixin] comes, I hope you can have a good time and earn a good time in Tiger Community! If you want to create high-quality articles, please checkGuidelines for Tiger Community Creation","html":"Finally, when your initial post [Bixin] [Bixin] comes, I hope you can have a good time and earn a good time in Tiger Community! If you want to create high-quality articles, please checkGuidelines for Tiger Community Creation"}],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":328343377,"gmtCreate":1615502016999,"gmtModify":1704783660002,"author":{"id":"3561847149000384","authorId":"3561847149000384","name":"Treeshaker","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/decf8e441d973187eb27d732a59be17d","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3561847149000384","authorIdStr":"3561847149000384"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"I have about $100 (round up to nearest 100).","listText":"I have about $100 (round up to nearest 100).","text":"I have about $100 (round up to nearest 100).","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/328343377","repostId":"1119544264","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1119544264","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1615476407,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1119544264?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-03-11 23:26","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Warren Buffett is now worth $100 billion","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1119544264","media":"CNN Business","summary":"New York/Hong Kong  - Warren Buffett has just joined the world's most exclusive club of the mega rich.The legendary American investor was worth $100 billion on Thursday, according to the Bloomberg Billionaire's Index. That puts him in the company of just five other men above that threshold. And he's now the sixth richest person in the world, ranking just behindFacebookCEO Mark Zuckerberg.The 90-year-old Buffett has added nearly $13 billion to his net worth this year as shares in his industrial a","content":"<p><b>New York/Hong Kong (CNN Business)&nbsp;-&nbsp;</b>Warren Buffett has just joined the world's most exclusive club of the mega rich.</p>\n<p>The legendary American investor was worth $100 billion on Thursday, according to the&nbsp;Bloomberg Billionaire's Index. That puts him in the company of just five other men above that threshold. And he's now the sixth richest person in the world, ranking just behindFacebook(FB)CEO Mark&nbsp;Zuckerberg.</p>\n<p>The 90-year-old&nbsp;Buffett&nbsp;has added nearly $13 billion to his net worth this year as shares in his industrial and insurance conglomerate have surged.Berkshire Hathaway(BRKA)is up nearly 15% in 2021, giving the company a market capitalization of more than $600 billion.</p>\n<p>Buffett and Berkshire Hathaway are famous for investing primarily in slow growth, \"value\" stocks — many of which have done very well this year as markets continue to recover from the pandemic-fueled crash a year ago. He recently revealed that Berkshire&nbsp;bought stakes in Dow components&nbsp;Chevron and Verizon, indicating a new interest in Big Oil, telecom and media.</p>\n<p>Chevron(CVX)is up 31% as&nbsp;crude prices recover the ground they lost&nbsp;during the early months of the pandemic.Verizon(VZ)&nbsp;hasn't fared nearly as well — the stock is down nearly 3% this year — but it's still above the lows it hit in March 2020.</p>\n<p>While Buffett has cracked the $100 billion mark, he's still a long way behind the world's richest person,Amazon(AMZN)CEO Jeff Bezos, who is worth $180 billion, according to Bloomberg. Bezos has been trading the title withTesla(TSLA)CEO Elon Musk, who's now worth $173 billion&nbsp;as shares in his electric carmaker rallyfrom recent losses.</p>\n<p>Microsoft(MSFT)co-founder Bill Gates is No. 3 on the list at $138 billion, while Bernard Arnault, the chairman of luxury goods groupLVMH(LVMHF), ranks No. 4 with $122 billion. Arnault is the wealthiest non-American on the list. Zuckerberg is No. 5 with a net worth of $101 billion.Buffett has donated billions of dollars to philanthropic causes, and in 2006, pledged to give away&nbsp;almost all of his fortune to charity.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Warren Buffett is now worth $100 billion</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWarren Buffett is now worth $100 billion\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-03-11 23:26 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://edition.cnn.com/2021/03/11/business/warren-buffett-net-worth-intl-hnk/index.html><strong>CNN Business</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>New York/Hong Kong (CNN Business) - Warren Buffett has just joined the world's most exclusive club of the mega rich.\nThe legendary American investor was worth $100 billion on Thursday, according to ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://edition.cnn.com/2021/03/11/business/warren-buffett-net-worth-intl-hnk/index.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BRK.A":"伯克希尔","BRK.B":"伯克希尔B"},"source_url":"https://edition.cnn.com/2021/03/11/business/warren-buffett-net-worth-intl-hnk/index.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1119544264","content_text":"New York/Hong Kong (CNN Business) - Warren Buffett has just joined the world's most exclusive club of the mega rich.\nThe legendary American investor was worth $100 billion on Thursday, according to the Bloomberg Billionaire's Index. That puts him in the company of just five other men above that threshold. And he's now the sixth richest person in the world, ranking just behindFacebook(FB)CEO Mark Zuckerberg.\nThe 90-year-old Buffett has added nearly $13 billion to his net worth this year as shares in his industrial and insurance conglomerate have surged.Berkshire Hathaway(BRKA)is up nearly 15% in 2021, giving the company a market capitalization of more than $600 billion.\nBuffett and Berkshire Hathaway are famous for investing primarily in slow growth, \"value\" stocks — many of which have done very well this year as markets continue to recover from the pandemic-fueled crash a year ago. He recently revealed that Berkshire bought stakes in Dow components Chevron and Verizon, indicating a new interest in Big Oil, telecom and media.\nChevron(CVX)is up 31% as crude prices recover the ground they lost during the early months of the pandemic.Verizon(VZ) hasn't fared nearly as well — the stock is down nearly 3% this year — but it's still above the lows it hit in March 2020.\nWhile Buffett has cracked the $100 billion mark, he's still a long way behind the world's richest person,Amazon(AMZN)CEO Jeff Bezos, who is worth $180 billion, according to Bloomberg. Bezos has been trading the title withTesla(TSLA)CEO Elon Musk, who's now worth $173 billion as shares in his electric carmaker rallyfrom recent losses.\nMicrosoft(MSFT)co-founder Bill Gates is No. 3 on the list at $138 billion, while Bernard Arnault, the chairman of luxury goods groupLVMH(LVMHF), ranks No. 4 with $122 billion. Arnault is the wealthiest non-American on the list. Zuckerberg is No. 5 with a net worth of $101 billion.Buffett has donated billions of dollars to philanthropic causes, and in 2006, pledged to give away almost all of his fortune to charity.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":424,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":367202321,"gmtCreate":1614951465963,"gmtModify":1704777359040,"author":{"id":"3561847149000384","authorId":"3561847149000384","name":"Treeshaker","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/decf8e441d973187eb27d732a59be17d","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3561847149000384","authorIdStr":"3561847149000384"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Oil up pls.&nbsp;","listText":"Oil up pls.&nbsp;","text":"Oil up pls.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/367202321","repostId":"1183926967","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1183926967","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"为用户提供金融资讯、行情、数据，旨在帮助投资者理解世界，做投资决策。","home_visible":1,"media_name":"老虎资讯综合","id":"102","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1614951176,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1183926967?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-03-05 21:32","market":"us","language":"en","title":"U.S. added 379,000 jobs in February, better than expected","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1183926967","media":"老虎资讯综合","summary":"(March 5) The U.S. economy added back more jobs in February than in January, as easing COVID-19 case","content":"<p>(March 5)&nbsp;The U.S. economy added back more jobs in February than in January, as easing COVID-19 case counts and a ramping vaccine rollout allowed distancing restrictions to begin to moderate.</p><p>The U.S. Labor Department released its February jobs report Friday morning at 8:30 a.m. ET. Here were the main metrics from the report, compared to consensus estimates compiled by Bloomberg:</p><ul><li><b>Non-farm payrolls: +379,000</b>&nbsp;vs. +200,000 expected and +49,000 in January</li><li><b>Unemployment rate:</b>&nbsp;6.2% vs. 6.3% expected and 6.3% in January</li><li><b>Average hourly earnings, month-over-month</b>: 0.2% vs. 0.2% expected and 0.2% in January</li><li><b>Average hourly earnings, year-over-year</b>: 5.3% vs. 5.3% expected and 5.4% in January</li></ul><p>The February jobs report comes on the heels of back-to-back disappointments in each of the January and December reports. The economy added atepid 49,000 payrolls in January,according to the unrevised print, and had lost payrolls on net for the first time since Aprilin December.Overall, the U.S. economy remains about 9.9 million payrolls short of its pre-pandemic levels.</p><p>But last month, job growth was expected to have accelerated as declining new COVID-19 cases and broadening vaccine-conferred immunity helped more businesses reopen with greater capacity. The unemployment rate was expected to hold at 6.3%, or well below the pandemic-era high of 14.8%, but still above the 50-year-low of 3.5% from February 2020.</p><p>The breakdown of job gains and declines by industry was set to be of particular interest in the latest jobs report, given that job losses during the pandemic have been so heavily concentrated in high-contact services industries, and especially at restaurants, bars, hotels and their ilk.</p><p>In December and January,service-related jobs bore the brunt of payroll declines, as a resurgence in new COVID-19 cases around the holidays led to renewed social distancing restrictions. Leisure and hospitality payrolls dropped by 61,000 in January, following a plunge of more than half a million in December. But these losses may have at least begun to soften in February.</p><p>\"As the pace of new COVID-19 cases steadily declined, restaurant activity accelerated in February, suggesting an increase in food service employment,\" Nomura chief economist Lewis Alexander said in a note on Wednesday. \"That strength continued into March based on preliminary data, consistent with our view that private employment growth should begin to recover more rapidly in the late spring as vaccinations continue and restrictions are eased.\"</p><p>Some other temporary factors may have added pressure to the labor market in February, including the inclement weather that blanketed much of the country mid-month. This may cause some unevenness in the data reported in the Labor Department's monthly household survey, which includes the unemployment rate, and establishment survey, which includes the change in non-farm payrolls, some economists noted.</p><p>\"Colder than usual weather in February likely weighed on certain sectors, including construction, retail and food services,\" Morgan Stanley economist Ellen Zentner wrote in a note Wednesday. \"This may have differentiated effects on the household and establishment sides of the report — whether they are employed, but 'not at work due to weather' in the household survey, or if they missed paychecks then that would also be reflected in the establishment survey.\"</p><p>Other reports on the U.S. labor market have come in mixed recently.ADP reported Wednesday that private payrolls increased by just 117,000in February, sharply missing estimates for a rise of 205,000 payrolls. But elsewhere,weekly jobless claims trended lower in Februaryversus January, suggesting a moderation in the number of newly unemployed.Plus, the Conference Board's labor differential— measuring the percentage of those saying jobs are \"plentiful\" subtracted by those claiming jobs are \"hard to get\" — turned positive for the first time since November in February.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>U.S. added 379,000 jobs in February, better than expected</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nU.S. added 379,000 jobs in February, better than expected\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/102\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">老虎资讯综合 </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-03-05 21:32</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>(March 5)&nbsp;The U.S. economy added back more jobs in February than in January, as easing COVID-19 case counts and a ramping vaccine rollout allowed distancing restrictions to begin to moderate.</p><p>The U.S. Labor Department released its February jobs report Friday morning at 8:30 a.m. ET. Here were the main metrics from the report, compared to consensus estimates compiled by Bloomberg:</p><ul><li><b>Non-farm payrolls: +379,000</b>&nbsp;vs. +200,000 expected and +49,000 in January</li><li><b>Unemployment rate:</b>&nbsp;6.2% vs. 6.3% expected and 6.3% in January</li><li><b>Average hourly earnings, month-over-month</b>: 0.2% vs. 0.2% expected and 0.2% in January</li><li><b>Average hourly earnings, year-over-year</b>: 5.3% vs. 5.3% expected and 5.4% in January</li></ul><p>The February jobs report comes on the heels of back-to-back disappointments in each of the January and December reports. The economy added atepid 49,000 payrolls in January,according to the unrevised print, and had lost payrolls on net for the first time since Aprilin December.Overall, the U.S. economy remains about 9.9 million payrolls short of its pre-pandemic levels.</p><p>But last month, job growth was expected to have accelerated as declining new COVID-19 cases and broadening vaccine-conferred immunity helped more businesses reopen with greater capacity. The unemployment rate was expected to hold at 6.3%, or well below the pandemic-era high of 14.8%, but still above the 50-year-low of 3.5% from February 2020.</p><p>The breakdown of job gains and declines by industry was set to be of particular interest in the latest jobs report, given that job losses during the pandemic have been so heavily concentrated in high-contact services industries, and especially at restaurants, bars, hotels and their ilk.</p><p>In December and January,service-related jobs bore the brunt of payroll declines, as a resurgence in new COVID-19 cases around the holidays led to renewed social distancing restrictions. Leisure and hospitality payrolls dropped by 61,000 in January, following a plunge of more than half a million in December. But these losses may have at least begun to soften in February.</p><p>\"As the pace of new COVID-19 cases steadily declined, restaurant activity accelerated in February, suggesting an increase in food service employment,\" Nomura chief economist Lewis Alexander said in a note on Wednesday. \"That strength continued into March based on preliminary data, consistent with our view that private employment growth should begin to recover more rapidly in the late spring as vaccinations continue and restrictions are eased.\"</p><p>Some other temporary factors may have added pressure to the labor market in February, including the inclement weather that blanketed much of the country mid-month. This may cause some unevenness in the data reported in the Labor Department's monthly household survey, which includes the unemployment rate, and establishment survey, which includes the change in non-farm payrolls, some economists noted.</p><p>\"Colder than usual weather in February likely weighed on certain sectors, including construction, retail and food services,\" Morgan Stanley economist Ellen Zentner wrote in a note Wednesday. \"This may have differentiated effects on the household and establishment sides of the report — whether they are employed, but 'not at work due to weather' in the household survey, or if they missed paychecks then that would also be reflected in the establishment survey.\"</p><p>Other reports on the U.S. labor market have come in mixed recently.ADP reported Wednesday that private payrolls increased by just 117,000in February, sharply missing estimates for a rise of 205,000 payrolls. But elsewhere,weekly jobless claims trended lower in Februaryversus January, suggesting a moderation in the number of newly unemployed.Plus, the Conference Board's labor differential— measuring the percentage of those saying jobs are \"plentiful\" subtracted by those claiming jobs are \"hard to get\" — turned positive for the first time since November in February.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/67ddaab67c271192b52371b38356b471","relate_stocks":{"SPY":"标普500ETF"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1183926967","content_text":"(March 5) The U.S. economy added back more jobs in February than in January, as easing COVID-19 case counts and a ramping vaccine rollout allowed distancing restrictions to begin to moderate.The U.S. Labor Department released its February jobs report Friday morning at 8:30 a.m. ET. Here were the main metrics from the report, compared to consensus estimates compiled by Bloomberg:Non-farm payrolls: +379,000 vs. +200,000 expected and +49,000 in JanuaryUnemployment rate: 6.2% vs. 6.3% expected and 6.3% in JanuaryAverage hourly earnings, month-over-month: 0.2% vs. 0.2% expected and 0.2% in JanuaryAverage hourly earnings, year-over-year: 5.3% vs. 5.3% expected and 5.4% in JanuaryThe February jobs report comes on the heels of back-to-back disappointments in each of the January and December reports. The economy added atepid 49,000 payrolls in January,according to the unrevised print, and had lost payrolls on net for the first time since Aprilin December.Overall, the U.S. economy remains about 9.9 million payrolls short of its pre-pandemic levels.But last month, job growth was expected to have accelerated as declining new COVID-19 cases and broadening vaccine-conferred immunity helped more businesses reopen with greater capacity. The unemployment rate was expected to hold at 6.3%, or well below the pandemic-era high of 14.8%, but still above the 50-year-low of 3.5% from February 2020.The breakdown of job gains and declines by industry was set to be of particular interest in the latest jobs report, given that job losses during the pandemic have been so heavily concentrated in high-contact services industries, and especially at restaurants, bars, hotels and their ilk.In December and January,service-related jobs bore the brunt of payroll declines, as a resurgence in new COVID-19 cases around the holidays led to renewed social distancing restrictions. Leisure and hospitality payrolls dropped by 61,000 in January, following a plunge of more than half a million in December. But these losses may have at least begun to soften in February.\"As the pace of new COVID-19 cases steadily declined, restaurant activity accelerated in February, suggesting an increase in food service employment,\" Nomura chief economist Lewis Alexander said in a note on Wednesday. \"That strength continued into March based on preliminary data, consistent with our view that private employment growth should begin to recover more rapidly in the late spring as vaccinations continue and restrictions are eased.\"Some other temporary factors may have added pressure to the labor market in February, including the inclement weather that blanketed much of the country mid-month. This may cause some unevenness in the data reported in the Labor Department's monthly household survey, which includes the unemployment rate, and establishment survey, which includes the change in non-farm payrolls, some economists noted.\"Colder than usual weather in February likely weighed on certain sectors, including construction, retail and food services,\" Morgan Stanley economist Ellen Zentner wrote in a note Wednesday. \"This may have differentiated effects on the household and establishment sides of the report — whether they are employed, but 'not at work due to weather' in the household survey, or if they missed paychecks then that would also be reflected in the establishment survey.\"Other reports on the U.S. labor market have come in mixed recently.ADP reported Wednesday that private payrolls increased by just 117,000in February, sharply missing estimates for a rise of 205,000 payrolls. But elsewhere,weekly jobless claims trended lower in Februaryversus January, suggesting a moderation in the number of newly unemployed.Plus, the Conference Board's labor differential— measuring the percentage of those saying jobs are \"plentiful\" subtracted by those claiming jobs are \"hard to get\" — turned positive for the first time since November in February.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":407,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":387542730,"gmtCreate":1613761351020,"gmtModify":1704884797037,"author":{"id":"3561847149000384","authorId":"3561847149000384","name":"Treeshaker","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/decf8e441d973187eb27d732a59be17d","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3561847149000384","authorIdStr":"3561847149000384"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Wow.&nbsp;","listText":"Wow.&nbsp;","text":"Wow.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/387542730","repostId":"1194607255","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1194607255","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1613728971,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1194607255?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-02-19 18:02","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Uber drivers should be classified as workers not independent contractors, top UK court rules","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1194607255","media":"cnbc","summary":"LONDON —Uberlost a crucial legal fight in the U.K. on Friday, as the country's Supreme Court upheld ","content":"<div>\n<p>LONDON —Uberlost a crucial legal fight in the U.K. on Friday, as the country's Supreme Court upheld a ruling that its drivers should be classified as workers rather than independent contractors.\nThe ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/02/19/uk-supreme-court-rules-uber-drivers-are-workers-not-contractors.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"cnbc_highlight","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Uber drivers should be classified as workers not independent contractors, top UK court rules</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nUber drivers should be classified as workers not independent contractors, top UK court rules\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-02-19 18:02 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.cnbc.com/2021/02/19/uk-supreme-court-rules-uber-drivers-are-workers-not-contractors.html><strong>cnbc</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>LONDON —Uberlost a crucial legal fight in the U.K. on Friday, as the country's Supreme Court upheld a ruling that its drivers should be classified as workers rather than independent contractors.\nThe ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/02/19/uk-supreme-court-rules-uber-drivers-are-workers-not-contractors.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"UBER":"优步"},"source_url":"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/02/19/uk-supreme-court-rules-uber-drivers-are-workers-not-contractors.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/72bb72e1b84c09fca865c6dcb1bbcd16","article_id":"1194607255","content_text":"LONDON —Uberlost a crucial legal fight in the U.K. on Friday, as the country's Supreme Court upheld a ruling that its drivers should be classified as workers rather than independent contractors.\nThe verdict concludes an almost five-year legal battle between Uber and a group of former drivers who claim they were workers entitled to employment rights like a minimum wage, holiday pay and rest breaks.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":185,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9002452024,"gmtCreate":1642080069296,"gmtModify":1676533678594,"author":{"id":"3561847149000384","authorId":"3561847149000384","name":"Treeshaker","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/decf8e441d973187eb27d732a59be17d","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3561847149000384","authorIdStr":"3561847149000384"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/TNXP\">$Tonix Pharmaceuticals(TNXP)$</a>Think it is betteroff to just liquidate the company. Shareholders may be better off?","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/TNXP\">$Tonix Pharmaceuticals(TNXP)$</a>Think it is betteroff to just liquidate the company. Shareholders may be better off?","text":"$Tonix Pharmaceuticals(TNXP)$Think it is betteroff to just liquidate the company. Shareholders may be better off?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9002452024","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":653,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":161574720,"gmtCreate":1623937025460,"gmtModify":1703823940077,"author":{"id":"3561847149000384","authorId":"3561847149000384","name":"Treeshaker","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/decf8e441d973187eb27d732a59be17d","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3561847149000384","authorIdStr":"3561847149000384"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GSAT\">$Globalstar(GSAT)$</a>Lets go baby.&nbsp;","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GSAT\">$Globalstar(GSAT)$</a>Lets go baby.&nbsp;","text":"$Globalstar(GSAT)$Lets go baby.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/161574720","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":320,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}