Kaelyn personal page - To The Moon

Kaelyn

No personal profile

20Follow

3Followers

0Topic

0Badge

2022-06-13

[smile]

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2022-04-15

[smile]

Apple Stock: Is It Cheap? Here's a Valuation Analysis.

2022-06-09

[smile]

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2022-06-01

[smile]

3 Stocks Wall Street Thinks Could Triple Your Money or Better

2022-05-11

[smile]

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2022-04-18

[smile]

Netflix, Tesla Earnings: What to Know in Markets This Week

2022-06-08

[smile]

TSLA Stock Analysis: 3 Innovations That Will Make Tesla the First $10 Trillion Company

2022-06-03

[smile]

US STOCKS-Wall Street Ends Sharply Higher, Led By Tesla and Nvidia

2022-06-02

[smile]

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2022-05-01

[smile]

Warren Buffett: We Didn't Repurchase Any Berkshire Stock in April

2022-04-20

[smile]

US STOCKS-Wall Street Ends Higher as Earnings Optimism Outshines Rising Yields

2022-04-19

[smile]

Netflix Q1 Earnings are Coming: 3 Most Important Things to Watch

2022-04-18

[smile]

Apple Vs. Microsoft: Why We Like Apple Better

2022-06-13

[smile]

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2022-04-28

[smile]

Palantir Technologies Stock: Bear vs. Bull

2022-06-09

[smile]

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2022-05-26

[smile]

Tesla Files Plans for Diner/Drive-in Theater Supercharger in Hollywood

2022-04-18

[smile]

Singapore Stocks to watch: Rex, HRNetGroup, Oxley, Elite Commercial Reit, HPL, SPH Reit

2022-04-15

[Like]

The Best Stocks to Invest $1,000 in Right Now

2022-06-02

[smile]

Sorry, the original content has been removed

Go to Tiger App to see more news

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"userPageInfo":{"id":"3562758894473836","uuid":"3562758894473836","gmtCreate":1599666548497,"gmtModify":1599666548497,"name":"Kaelyn","pinyin":"kaelyn","introduction":"","introductionEn":"","signature":"","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":3,"headSize":20,"tweetSize":24,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":1,"name":"萌萌虎","nameTw":"萌萌虎","represent":"呱呱坠地","factor":"评论帖子3次或发布1条主帖（非转发）","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":"success","userBadges":[{"badgeId":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493-3","templateUuid":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493","name":" Tiger Idol","description":"Join the tiger community for 1500 days","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8b40ae7da5bf081a1c84df14bf9e6367","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f160eceddd7c284a8e1136557615cfad","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/11792805c468334a9b31c39f95a41c6a","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2024.10.20","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789-1","templateUuid":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789","name":"Knowledgeable Investor","description":"Traded more than 10 stocks","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e74cc24115c4fbae6154ec1b1041bf47","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d48265cbfd97c57f9048db29f22227b0","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76c6d6898b073c77e1c537ebe9ac1c57","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1102},{"badgeId":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84-1","templateUuid":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84","name":"Real Trader","description":"Completed a transaction","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100},{"badgeId":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be-2","templateUuid":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be","name":"Master Trader","description":"Total number of securities or futures transactions reached 100","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ad22cfbe2d05aa393b18e9226e4b0307","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/36702e6ff3ffe46acafee66cc85273ca","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d52eb88fa385cf5abe2616ed63781765","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":"80.95%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":4,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":null,"starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"hot","tweets":[{"id":9052378453,"gmtCreate":1655131681372,"gmtModify":1676535567342,"author":{"id":"3562758894473836","authorId":"3562758894473836","name":"Kaelyn","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3562758894473836","authorIdStr":"3562758894473836"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[smile]&nbsp;","listText":"[smile]&nbsp;","text":"[smile]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9052378453","repostId":"2243965764","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2243965764","pubTimestamp":1655131139,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2243965764?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-06-13 22:38","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Is Starting to Walk and Talk Like a Bank. Could It Ever Become One?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2243965764","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Apple recently took another big step in the financial services space.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>Apple</b> appeared to catch the market by surprise when it recently announced plans to offer a buy now, pay later (BNPL) offering in its wallet app, another step into the financial services space for the consumer tech giant. Many have long feared that tech giants like Apple could <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> day become banks and offer traditional financial services because of their superior customer acquisition and tech capabilities. With Apple continuing to walk and talk more like a bank, could the company ever get a banking charter and become one?</p><h2>The BNPL offering</h2><p>Customers who use Apple&#39;s wallet app to purchase items will have the option to put no money down and pay off the purchase through multiple installment payments with no extra fees or interest attached. The buy now, pay later payment format has become wildly popular among consumers and also has helped merchants increase sales.</p><p>To start, this will be a challenge to others in the BNPL space because of how well integrated the offering is. But Apple is also planning to fund the loans from its own balance sheet and make loan underwriting decisions through its own subsidiary, called Apple Financing. Typically, a lot of consumer tech companies will turn to partner banks to help them set up this kind of infrastructure, which is why this announcement has attracted so much interest.</p><p>Apple is still partnering with <b>Mastercard</b> to help it set up its BNPL offering. Mastercard has a white-label product and still communicates with the vendors to make the process possible. <b>Goldman Sachs </b>is the issuer of Apple&#39;s credit card. Apple Financing has also apparently obtained all of the necessary state licenses to issue the BNPL loans.</p><h2>Getting a bank charter</h2><p>While it&#39;s very uncommon for a large tech company to outright obtain a bank charter, large payments and tech company <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SQ\">Block</a></b> did manage to obtain an industrial bank charter after a very lengthy process. An industrial bank charter is for a state-chartered bank with insurance from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. (FDIC), but it is a bit more limited in nature.</p><p>So, while Apple could try to pursue a bank charter, I doubt it would, given how long the process might take and the pushback it might receive from the banking industry and other regulators due to antitrust concerns. With more than 1.8 billion active iPhones, if Apple did ever pursue a charter and get more involved in traditional banking services, there could be concerns over data privacy.</p><p>A recent example that comes to mind is <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/META\">Meta Platforms</a></b>&#39; foray into stablecoins, which are digital assets pegged to a commodity or fiat currency. Meta for years sank time and resources into building a U.S. dollar-backed stablecoin called Diem, but kept running into regulatory issues. The company tried partnering with an issuing bank for the token but eventually ended up selling the project. Many surmise that regulatory issues were the primary reason for the sale.</p><p>Finally, keep in mind that banking is a very heavily regulated industry, with most banks having three regulators. Even Block, with its industrial charter, is still regulated by the FDIC and the Utah Department of <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FISI\">Financial Institutions</a>. And then once a company is a bank, it has to raise and hold regulatory capital, which investors are not always so thrilled about.</p><h2>Will it ever happen?</h2><p>I find it unlikely that Apple would ever pursue a bank charter due to pushback from regulators, the lengthy application process, and the need to hold regulatory capital. But perhaps after setting up and running some of its banking infrastructure, Apple will get more interested, especially if it sees serious profit potential. But even without getting a charter, the fact that Apple is bringing its loan underwriting under its roof will give the company more data on its consumers&#39; finances, which could embolden Apple to offer even more financial services in the future.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Is Starting to Walk and Talk Like a Bank. Could It Ever Become One?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Is Starting to Walk and Talk Like a Bank. Could It Ever Become One?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-06-13 22:38 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/06/13/apple-starting-walk-and-talk-like-bank-bnpl/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Apple appeared to catch the market by surprise when it recently announced plans to offer a buy now, pay later (BNPL) offering in its wallet app, another step into the financial services space for the ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/06/13/apple-starting-walk-and-talk-like-bank-bnpl/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/06/13/apple-starting-walk-and-talk-like-bank-bnpl/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2243965764","content_text":"Apple appeared to catch the market by surprise when it recently announced plans to offer a buy now, pay later (BNPL) offering in its wallet app, another step into the financial services space for the consumer tech giant. Many have long feared that tech giants like Apple could one day become banks and offer traditional financial services because of their superior customer acquisition and tech capabilities. With Apple continuing to walk and talk more like a bank, could the company ever get a banking charter and become one?The BNPL offeringCustomers who use Apple's wallet app to purchase items will have the option to put no money down and pay off the purchase through multiple installment payments with no extra fees or interest attached. The buy now, pay later payment format has become wildly popular among consumers and also has helped merchants increase sales.To start, this will be a challenge to others in the BNPL space because of how well integrated the offering is. But Apple is also planning to fund the loans from its own balance sheet and make loan underwriting decisions through its own subsidiary, called Apple Financing. Typically, a lot of consumer tech companies will turn to partner banks to help them set up this kind of infrastructure, which is why this announcement has attracted so much interest.Apple is still partnering with Mastercard to help it set up its BNPL offering. Mastercard has a white-label product and still communicates with the vendors to make the process possible. Goldman Sachs is the issuer of Apple's credit card. Apple Financing has also apparently obtained all of the necessary state licenses to issue the BNPL loans.Getting a bank charterWhile it's very uncommon for a large tech company to outright obtain a bank charter, large payments and tech company Block did manage to obtain an industrial bank charter after a very lengthy process. An industrial bank charter is for a state-chartered bank with insurance from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. (FDIC), but it is a bit more limited in nature.So, while Apple could try to pursue a bank charter, I doubt it would, given how long the process might take and the pushback it might receive from the banking industry and other regulators due to antitrust concerns. With more than 1.8 billion active iPhones, if Apple did ever pursue a charter and get more involved in traditional banking services, there could be concerns over data privacy.A recent example that comes to mind is Meta Platforms' foray into stablecoins, which are digital assets pegged to a commodity or fiat currency. Meta for years sank time and resources into building a U.S. dollar-backed stablecoin called Diem, but kept running into regulatory issues. The company tried partnering with an issuing bank for the token but eventually ended up selling the project. Many surmise that regulatory issues were the primary reason for the sale.Finally, keep in mind that banking is a very heavily regulated industry, with most banks having three regulators. Even Block, with its industrial charter, is still regulated by the FDIC and the Utah Department of Financial Institutions. And then once a company is a bank, it has to raise and hold regulatory capital, which investors are not always so thrilled about.Will it ever happen?I find it unlikely that Apple would ever pursue a bank charter due to pushback from regulators, the lengthy application process, and the need to hold regulatory capital. But perhaps after setting up and running some of its banking infrastructure, Apple will get more interested, especially if it sees serious profit potential. But even without getting a charter, the fact that Apple is bringing its loan underwriting under its roof will give the company more data on its consumers' finances, which could embolden Apple to offer even more financial services in the future.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":308,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9052378277,"gmtCreate":1655131666699,"gmtModify":1676535567342,"author":{"id":"3562758894473836","authorId":"3562758894473836","name":"Kaelyn","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3562758894473836","authorIdStr":"3562758894473836"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[smile]&nbsp;","listText":"[smile]&nbsp;","text":"[smile]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9052378277","repostId":"1138793205","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1138793205","pubTimestamp":1655134386,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1138793205?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-06-13 23:33","market":"us","language":"en","title":"NIO: Time For Massive Growth","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1138793205","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"SummaryResults pressured by China covid lockdowns.Production set to soar in coming quarters.Street sees stock doubling from current level.Late last week, one of the weaker names in the market was Chin","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>Summary</b></p><ul><li>Results pressured by China covid lockdowns.</li><li>Production set to soar in coming quarters.</li><li>Street sees stock doubling from current level.</li></ul><p>Late last week, one of the weaker names in the market was Chinese electric vehicle maker NIO (NYSE:NIO), after the company reported itsfirst quarter results. Investors focused on weaker than expected guidance for Q2, but it was already known that the situation in China was going to pressure results for the period. The most important part of last week&#39;s earnings report was management&#39;s commentary on upcoming production plans, which showed that massive growth is finally about to come.</p><p>For Q1, revenues came in at $1.56 billion, which was up more than 24% year over year, and came in a little ahead of estimates. One of my main issues with NIO is that it usually reports results so late in the quarter that these numbers seem basically irrelevant, since we&#39;re almost done with Q2 already. On the bottom line, non-GAAP earnings per ADS beat by three cents, but this is still a company that&#39;s losing plenty of money at this time.</p><p>The main reason for shares dropping after Thursday&#39;s report was the following headline - management guided to between $1.47 billion and $1.59 billion in revenues for the second quarter. Wall Street had anticipated second quarter revenue to reach $1.79 billion. Deliveries are expected to be in a range of 23,000 to 25,000, with even the high end of that being a sequential decline from Q1&#39;s 25,768 units. As a reminder, Q2 is the first full quarter for deliveries of the ET7 sedan, which saw just 163 deliveries late in Q1.</p><p>I&#39;m pretty much discounting this guidance miss, just because the analyst average seemed so ridiculous going into last week&#39;s report. NIO had already reported its April and May delivery numbers, which were heavily pressured by China&#39;s covid lockdowns. Even though we knew June would be better, supply chain issues are still a problem, so to think revenues were going to jump over $200 million sequentially seemed highly questionable. Management is basically guiding for a monthly record in terms of June vehicle deliveries, and yet it is still likely to fall a bit short of Q1&#39;s quarterly total. I think analysts were just waiting to see what was reported and then adjust, but the result was a headline of very weak guidance.</p><p>NIO investors have been waiting for several quarters now to see production really ramp up. It has been over a year now since the company announceda new production agreementwith its partner JAC to double factory output to 240,000 units a year. Still, though, the company hasn&#39;t been able to report even 26,000 deliveries in a single quarter. The company is also in the process of building out its own facility called NeoPark. Duringthe conference call, management provided this key update regarding production, with &#34;F2&#34; referring to NeoPark:</p><blockquote>For the production capacity of our first plant with JAC-NIO, as we have mentioned, we will continue to ramp up its production capacity in Q3. I think probably at least in the second half of the year, our overall plant capacity should reach 20,000 units per month. It can be -- it&#39;s not probably too hard for us to see when.</blockquote><blockquote>And then for the F2&#39;s ramp-up pace, actually, first, we will kick off the delivery of ET5 from this plant in Q3. So it will start production in Q3 and that we try to reach 10,000 units within quite a short period, probably three, four months. I think that&#39;s our plan.</blockquote><blockquote>Of course, next year, as we introduce more models into this factory, the overall production volume of F2 will continue to rise.</blockquote><p>It remains to be seen how quickly NIO will actually reach these rates. As I&#39;vedetailed in the past, the company&#39;s growth timelines haven&#39;t worked out as some may have hoped. All it takes is some more supply chain issues or another round of covid lockdowns, and these production rates won&#39;t be seen until sometime in 2023. This kind of tremendous growth in units is expected to drive a major surge in NIO revenues, with analyst estimates shown below.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4e17e14941758d428fd4219d8740bb4d\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"264\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>NIO Revenue Estimates(Seeking Alpha)</p><p>This significant expected revenue growth in the next 12-18 months is a main reason why theaverage price targeton the street is double what NIO shares closed at on Friday. The valuation seems quite reasonable currently, with the stock going for 1.9 times expected 2023 sales, as opposed to fellow Chinese EV names like XPeng (XPEV) going for 2.1 times and Li Auto (LI) at 2.2 times. Of course, EV giant Tesla (TSLA) trades for over 6.2 times projected sales for next year, as investors are certainly willing to pay a lot more for that name.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>NIO: Time For Massive Growth</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nNIO: Time For Massive Growth\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-06-13 23:33 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4518041-nio-stock-time-for-massive-growth><strong>Seeking Alpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>SummaryResults pressured by China covid lockdowns.Production set to soar in coming quarters.Street sees stock doubling from current level.Late last week, one of the weaker names in the market was ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4518041-nio-stock-time-for-massive-growth\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NIO":"蔚来","NIO.SI":"蔚来","09866":"蔚来-SW"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4518041-nio-stock-time-for-massive-growth","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1138793205","content_text":"SummaryResults pressured by China covid lockdowns.Production set to soar in coming quarters.Street sees stock doubling from current level.Late last week, one of the weaker names in the market was Chinese electric vehicle maker NIO (NYSE:NIO), after the company reported itsfirst quarter results. Investors focused on weaker than expected guidance for Q2, but it was already known that the situation in China was going to pressure results for the period. The most important part of last week's earnings report was management's commentary on upcoming production plans, which showed that massive growth is finally about to come.For Q1, revenues came in at $1.56 billion, which was up more than 24% year over year, and came in a little ahead of estimates. One of my main issues with NIO is that it usually reports results so late in the quarter that these numbers seem basically irrelevant, since we're almost done with Q2 already. On the bottom line, non-GAAP earnings per ADS beat by three cents, but this is still a company that's losing plenty of money at this time.The main reason for shares dropping after Thursday's report was the following headline - management guided to between $1.47 billion and $1.59 billion in revenues for the second quarter. Wall Street had anticipated second quarter revenue to reach $1.79 billion. Deliveries are expected to be in a range of 23,000 to 25,000, with even the high end of that being a sequential decline from Q1's 25,768 units. As a reminder, Q2 is the first full quarter for deliveries of the ET7 sedan, which saw just 163 deliveries late in Q1.I'm pretty much discounting this guidance miss, just because the analyst average seemed so ridiculous going into last week's report. NIO had already reported its April and May delivery numbers, which were heavily pressured by China's covid lockdowns. Even though we knew June would be better, supply chain issues are still a problem, so to think revenues were going to jump over $200 million sequentially seemed highly questionable. Management is basically guiding for a monthly record in terms of June vehicle deliveries, and yet it is still likely to fall a bit short of Q1's quarterly total. I think analysts were just waiting to see what was reported and then adjust, but the result was a headline of very weak guidance.NIO investors have been waiting for several quarters now to see production really ramp up. It has been over a year now since the company announceda new production agreementwith its partner JAC to double factory output to 240,000 units a year. Still, though, the company hasn't been able to report even 26,000 deliveries in a single quarter. The company is also in the process of building out its own facility called NeoPark. Duringthe conference call, management provided this key update regarding production, with \"F2\" referring to NeoPark:For the production capacity of our first plant with JAC-NIO, as we have mentioned, we will continue to ramp up its production capacity in Q3. I think probably at least in the second half of the year, our overall plant capacity should reach 20,000 units per month. It can be -- it's not probably too hard for us to see when.And then for the F2's ramp-up pace, actually, first, we will kick off the delivery of ET5 from this plant in Q3. So it will start production in Q3 and that we try to reach 10,000 units within quite a short period, probably three, four months. I think that's our plan.Of course, next year, as we introduce more models into this factory, the overall production volume of F2 will continue to rise.It remains to be seen how quickly NIO will actually reach these rates. As I'vedetailed in the past, the company's growth timelines haven't worked out as some may have hoped. All it takes is some more supply chain issues or another round of covid lockdowns, and these production rates won't be seen until sometime in 2023. This kind of tremendous growth in units is expected to drive a major surge in NIO revenues, with analyst estimates shown below.NIO Revenue Estimates(Seeking Alpha)This significant expected revenue growth in the next 12-18 months is a main reason why theaverage price targeton the street is double what NIO shares closed at on Friday. The valuation seems quite reasonable currently, with the stock going for 1.9 times expected 2023 sales, as opposed to fellow Chinese EV names like XPeng (XPEV) going for 2.1 times and Li Auto (LI) at 2.2 times. Of course, EV giant Tesla (TSLA) trades for over 6.2 times projected sales for next year, as investors are certainly willing to pay a lot more for that name.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":154,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9058088986,"gmtCreate":1654753204345,"gmtModify":1676535505289,"author":{"id":"3562758894473836","authorId":"3562758894473836","name":"Kaelyn","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3562758894473836","authorIdStr":"3562758894473836"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[smile]&nbsp;","listText":"[smile]&nbsp;","text":"[smile]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9058088986","repostId":"1188644119","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":325,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9058088088,"gmtCreate":1654753193144,"gmtModify":1676535505280,"author":{"id":"3562758894473836","authorId":"3562758894473836","name":"Kaelyn","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3562758894473836","authorIdStr":"3562758894473836"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[smile]&nbsp;","listText":"[smile]&nbsp;","text":"[smile]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9058088088","repostId":"1188644119","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1188644119","pubTimestamp":1654752647,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1188644119?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-06-09 13:30","market":"us","language":"en","title":"META Alert! Facebook's Old FB Stock Ticker Is No More","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1188644119","media":"cnn","summary":"If you want to find the stock price of Mark Zuckerberg's company, typing the familiar \"FB\" ticker on","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>If you want to find the stock price of Mark Zuckerberg&#39;s company, typing the familiar &#34;FB&#34; ticker on your favorite search engine, brokerage firm app or financial news site (hopefully this one!) will soon give you an error message or redirect.</p><p>That&#39;s because the company formerly known as Facebook (FB) will no longer use the &#34;FB&#34; symbol it&#39;s had since its 2012 initial public offering. Instead, it will be trading under the new symbol of &#34;META&#34; as of Thursday.</p><p>The new ticker comes a few months after Facebook officially changed its corporate name to Meta Platforms. The Meta moniker is a reflection of the social media giant&#39;s pivot to the metaverse, with virtual worlds becoming an increasingly important part of the future for the owner of Facebook, Instagram, Messenger and WhatsApp.</p><p>As the company describes it, Facebook is &#34;moving beyond 2D screens toward immersive experiences like augmented and virtual reality to help build the next evolution in social technology.&#34;</p><p>Initially, the company said it would change its ticker symbol in December 2021 to &#34;MVRS,&#34; a vowel-deficient version of Metaverse.</p><p>Why not &#34;META&#34;? Meta Platforms was originally unable to announce that it would use &#34;META&#34; as its new symbol, because there already was an exchange-traded fund that had that ticker: the Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF.</p><p>That ETF, as its name implies, invests in companies with exposure to the metaverse. In fact, Meta Platforms is its top holding. It also owns gaming chip giant Nvidia (NVDA), video game platform Roblox and Microsoft (MSFT).</p><p>This story should end here — but Meta Platforms clearly really, really wanted to have the &#34;META&#34; ticker for itself.</p><p>Meta Platforms announced in November that it was postponing the ticker change to this year. It didn&#39;t give a reason for the change. Then, in mid-January, Roundhill said it was changing the ticker of its metaverse ETF to &#34;METV.&#34; That took effect at the end of January. Roundhill also didn&#39;t give a reason for the change.</p><p>Roundhill and Meta Platforms may have held discussions about letting the social media giant get the coveted &#34;META&#34; ticker. Meta Platforms and Roundhill were not immediately available for comment.</p><p>Facebook&#39;s transition to Meta Platforms has been a rocky one. The stock has plummeted more than 40% this year as investors wonder if the strategy shift will pay off. Roundhill&#39;s metaverse ETF has also plunged about 40%.</p><p>Concerns about slowing user growth, advertiser skittishness as the economy cools and emerging competition from TikTok have hurt Meta Platforms and other social media stocks, such as Snapchat (SNAP), Pinterest (PINS) and Twitter (TWTR).</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>META Alert! Facebook's Old FB Stock Ticker Is No More</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nMETA Alert! Facebook's Old FB Stock Ticker Is No More\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-06-09 13:30 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.cnn.com/2022/06/08/investing/facebook-meta-ticker-symbol-change/index.html><strong>cnn</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>If you want to find the stock price of Mark Zuckerberg's company, typing the familiar \"FB\" ticker on your favorite search engine, brokerage firm app or financial news site (hopefully this one!) will ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.cnn.com/2022/06/08/investing/facebook-meta-ticker-symbol-change/index.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"META":"Meta Platforms, Inc."},"source_url":"https://www.cnn.com/2022/06/08/investing/facebook-meta-ticker-symbol-change/index.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1188644119","content_text":"If you want to find the stock price of Mark Zuckerberg's company, typing the familiar \"FB\" ticker on your favorite search engine, brokerage firm app or financial news site (hopefully this one!) will soon give you an error message or redirect.That's because the company formerly known as Facebook (FB) will no longer use the \"FB\" symbol it's had since its 2012 initial public offering. Instead, it will be trading under the new symbol of \"META\" as of Thursday.The new ticker comes a few months after Facebook officially changed its corporate name to Meta Platforms. The Meta moniker is a reflection of the social media giant's pivot to the metaverse, with virtual worlds becoming an increasingly important part of the future for the owner of Facebook, Instagram, Messenger and WhatsApp.As the company describes it, Facebook is \"moving beyond 2D screens toward immersive experiences like augmented and virtual reality to help build the next evolution in social technology.\"Initially, the company said it would change its ticker symbol in December 2021 to \"MVRS,\" a vowel-deficient version of Metaverse.Why not \"META\"? Meta Platforms was originally unable to announce that it would use \"META\" as its new symbol, because there already was an exchange-traded fund that had that ticker: the Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF.That ETF, as its name implies, invests in companies with exposure to the metaverse. In fact, Meta Platforms is its top holding. It also owns gaming chip giant Nvidia (NVDA), video game platform Roblox and Microsoft (MSFT).This story should end here — but Meta Platforms clearly really, really wanted to have the \"META\" ticker for itself.Meta Platforms announced in November that it was postponing the ticker change to this year. It didn't give a reason for the change. Then, in mid-January, Roundhill said it was changing the ticker of its metaverse ETF to \"METV.\" That took effect at the end of January. Roundhill also didn't give a reason for the change.Roundhill and Meta Platforms may have held discussions about letting the social media giant get the coveted \"META\" ticker. Meta Platforms and Roundhill were not immediately available for comment.Facebook's transition to Meta Platforms has been a rocky one. The stock has plummeted more than 40% this year as investors wonder if the strategy shift will pay off. Roundhill's metaverse ETF has also plunged about 40%.Concerns about slowing user growth, advertiser skittishness as the economy cools and emerging competition from TikTok have hurt Meta Platforms and other social media stocks, such as Snapchat (SNAP), Pinterest (PINS) and Twitter (TWTR).","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":382,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9051800429,"gmtCreate":1654657662661,"gmtModify":1676535487336,"author":{"id":"3562758894473836","authorId":"3562758894473836","name":"Kaelyn","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3562758894473836","authorIdStr":"3562758894473836"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[smile]&nbsp;","listText":"[smile]&nbsp;","text":"[smile]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9051800429","repostId":"1101649003","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":265,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9050796520,"gmtCreate":1654236315260,"gmtModify":1676535418275,"author":{"id":"3562758894473836","authorId":"3562758894473836","name":"Kaelyn","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3562758894473836","authorIdStr":"3562758894473836"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[smile]&nbsp;","listText":"[smile]&nbsp;","text":"[smile]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9050796520","repostId":"2240266262","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":189,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9050332799,"gmtCreate":1654131320711,"gmtModify":1676535399877,"author":{"id":"3562758894473836","authorId":"3562758894473836","name":"Kaelyn","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3562758894473836","authorIdStr":"3562758894473836"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[smile]&nbsp;","listText":"[smile]&nbsp;","text":"[smile]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9050332799","repostId":"1150961641","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1150961641","pubTimestamp":1654130914,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1150961641?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-06-02 08:48","market":"us","language":"en","title":"How Are the GameStop and Amazon Stock Splits Different?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1150961641","media":"InvestorPlace","summary":"Tomorrow, GME shareholders will vote on a proposal to increase the share count of GameStop(NYSE:GME)","content":"<html><head></head><body><ul><li>Tomorrow, GME shareholders will vote on a proposal to increase the share count of <b>GameStop</b>(NYSE:<b><u>GME</u></b>) as the company prepares for a potential stock split.</li><li>A day after the vote, <b>Amazon</b>(NASDAQ:<b><u>AMZN</u></b>) will enact its own stock split.</li><li>Although occurring close together, the GME vote and AMZN stock split are distinctly different events.</li></ul><p>Investors are experiencing another exciting week. Tomorrow, GameStop shareholders will vote on some important proposals that may mean a GME stock split in the near future. Amazon will also enact its own stock split one day later. For investors, the AMZN stock split means an opportunity to purchase shares of the tech behemoth at a lower price tag.</p><p>Both of these news items are important. But investors need to know that they are two distinctly different events with different implications.</p><p>Let’s take a closer look at this week’s stock split news.</p><p><b>AMZN Stock Split vs. GME Stock Split News</b></p><p>Amazon and GameStop are two out of seven notable companies planning to split their stocks in the coming months. The list also includes some of the tech sector’s biggest names, such as <b>Tesla</b>(NASDAQ:<b><u>TSLA</u></b>) and <b>Shopify</b>(NYSE:<b><u>SHOP</u></b>).</p><p>These companies experienced significant growth in the 2021 bull market. They have also realized that splitting their stocks will make them more accessible to retail investors moving forward. For aspiring investors, the AMZN stock split represents a unique buying opportunity in particular.</p><p>Shareholders have already voted on and approved the AMZN stock split. The 20-for-1 split means that every one share of AMZN will be divided into 20 shares. So, investors will own more shares after the split, but the value of their holdings will remain unchanged. However, the split will likely trigger a trading frenzy as more investors scramble to buy in at the lower share price.</p><p>On the other hand, the upcoming GameStop vote is still in its proposal stage. Tomorrow is not an actual split of the stock, but a shareholder meeting where investors will vote on whether to allow for an authorized share count increase. According to GameStop’s2022 Proxy Statement, the increase will allow the company “to implement a stock split of our</p><p>common stock […] and provide flexibility for future corporate needs.”</p><p>While not definite, there is no reason to believe shareholders will shoot down this proposal. After all, investors know that when Tesla enacted a split in August 2020, its stock value more than doubled the following year. Some experts see the potential split as Chairman Ryan Cohenaligning the needs of both investors and management.</p><p><b>What to Expect</b></p><p>Investors can likely expect this GameStop proposal to pass, in part because a potential GME stock split could mean future gains. Back in 2021, GME caught Wall Street’s attention due to its committed investor base. It’s highly unlikely the meme stock crowd will abandon shares; groups like <b>Reddit’s</b>r/WallStreetBets have triggered trading frenzies before and they can do it again. If investors vote in favor of the proposal and the company later enacts a split, it won’t take long for shares to climb.</p><p>AMZN stock is rising today as anticipation mounts for its split. Meanwhile, GME stock is down as it battles broader market forces like high short interest and a looming earnings report.</p><p>This week’s events are different, but they are both positive growth catalysts. The AMZN stock split is poised to rock markets on Friday. GME stock may soon do the same if its proposal passes tomorrow.</p></body></html>","source":"lsy1606302653667","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>How Are the GameStop and Amazon Stock Splits Different?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHow Are the GameStop and Amazon Stock Splits Different?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-06-02 08:48 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://investorplace.com/2022/06/how-are-the-gamestop-and-amazon-stock-splits-different/><strong>InvestorPlace</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Tomorrow, GME shareholders will vote on a proposal to increase the share count of GameStop(NYSE:GME) as the company prepares for a potential stock split.A day after the vote, Amazon(NASDAQ:AMZN) will ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://investorplace.com/2022/06/how-are-the-gamestop-and-amazon-stock-splits-different/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AMZN":"亚马逊","GME":"游戏驿站"},"source_url":"https://investorplace.com/2022/06/how-are-the-gamestop-and-amazon-stock-splits-different/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1150961641","content_text":"Tomorrow, GME shareholders will vote on a proposal to increase the share count of GameStop(NYSE:GME) as the company prepares for a potential stock split.A day after the vote, Amazon(NASDAQ:AMZN) will enact its own stock split.Although occurring close together, the GME vote and AMZN stock split are distinctly different events.Investors are experiencing another exciting week. Tomorrow, GameStop shareholders will vote on some important proposals that may mean a GME stock split in the near future. Amazon will also enact its own stock split one day later. For investors, the AMZN stock split means an opportunity to purchase shares of the tech behemoth at a lower price tag.Both of these news items are important. But investors need to know that they are two distinctly different events with different implications.Let’s take a closer look at this week’s stock split news.AMZN Stock Split vs. GME Stock Split NewsAmazon and GameStop are two out of seven notable companies planning to split their stocks in the coming months. The list also includes some of the tech sector’s biggest names, such as Tesla(NASDAQ:TSLA) and Shopify(NYSE:SHOP).These companies experienced significant growth in the 2021 bull market. They have also realized that splitting their stocks will make them more accessible to retail investors moving forward. For aspiring investors, the AMZN stock split represents a unique buying opportunity in particular.Shareholders have already voted on and approved the AMZN stock split. The 20-for-1 split means that every one share of AMZN will be divided into 20 shares. So, investors will own more shares after the split, but the value of their holdings will remain unchanged. However, the split will likely trigger a trading frenzy as more investors scramble to buy in at the lower share price.On the other hand, the upcoming GameStop vote is still in its proposal stage. Tomorrow is not an actual split of the stock, but a shareholder meeting where investors will vote on whether to allow for an authorized share count increase. According to GameStop’s2022 Proxy Statement, the increase will allow the company “to implement a stock split of ourcommon stock […] and provide flexibility for future corporate needs.”While not definite, there is no reason to believe shareholders will shoot down this proposal. After all, investors know that when Tesla enacted a split in August 2020, its stock value more than doubled the following year. Some experts see the potential split as Chairman Ryan Cohenaligning the needs of both investors and management.What to ExpectInvestors can likely expect this GameStop proposal to pass, in part because a potential GME stock split could mean future gains. Back in 2021, GME caught Wall Street’s attention due to its committed investor base. It’s highly unlikely the meme stock crowd will abandon shares; groups like Reddit’sr/WallStreetBets have triggered trading frenzies before and they can do it again. If investors vote in favor of the proposal and the company later enacts a split, it won’t take long for shares to climb.AMZN stock is rising today as anticipation mounts for its split. Meanwhile, GME stock is down as it battles broader market forces like high short interest and a looming earnings report.This week’s events are different, but they are both positive growth catalysts. The AMZN stock split is poised to rock markets on Friday. GME stock may soon do the same if its proposal passes tomorrow.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":676,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9050332277,"gmtCreate":1654131312499,"gmtModify":1676535399878,"author":{"id":"3562758894473836","authorId":"3562758894473836","name":"Kaelyn","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3562758894473836","authorIdStr":"3562758894473836"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[smile]&nbsp;","listText":"[smile]&nbsp;","text":"[smile]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9050332277","repostId":"1150961641","repostType":2,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":536,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9027547998,"gmtCreate":1654057212114,"gmtModify":1676535387118,"author":{"id":"3562758894473836","authorId":"3562758894473836","name":"Kaelyn","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3562758894473836","authorIdStr":"3562758894473836"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[smile]&nbsp;","listText":"[smile]&nbsp;","text":"[smile]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9027547998","repostId":"2239912192","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":264,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9022296843,"gmtCreate":1653528418082,"gmtModify":1676535299008,"author":{"id":"3562758894473836","authorId":"3562758894473836","name":"Kaelyn","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3562758894473836","authorIdStr":"3562758894473836"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[smile]&nbsp;","listText":"[smile]&nbsp;","text":"[smile]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9022296843","repostId":"1115378536","repostType":2,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":244,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9065763932,"gmtCreate":1652235198926,"gmtModify":1676535059218,"author":{"id":"3562758894473836","authorId":"3562758894473836","name":"Kaelyn","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3562758894473836","authorIdStr":"3562758894473836"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[smile]&nbsp;","listText":"[smile]&nbsp;","text":"[smile]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9065763932","repostId":"2234064478","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":166,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9063886519,"gmtCreate":1651452796394,"gmtModify":1676534907721,"author":{"id":"3562758894473836","authorId":"3562758894473836","name":"Kaelyn","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3562758894473836","authorIdStr":"3562758894473836"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[smile]&nbsp;","listText":"[smile]&nbsp;","text":"[smile]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9063886519","repostId":"1176424262","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1176424262","pubTimestamp":1651444252,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1176424262?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-05-02 06:30","market":"us","language":"en","title":"FOMC Decision, April Jobs Numbers, First-Quarter Earnings, and More for Investors to Watch This Week","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1176424262","media":"Barrons","summary":"Brandsrelease quarterly results.The Federal Open Market Committee announces its monetary-policy decision. The FOMC is widely expected to raise the federal-funds rate by half a percentage point to 0.75%-1%. The current Wall Street consensus calls for the federal-fu","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>First-quarter earnings season continues this week, with more than 150 S&amp;P 500 companies scheduled to report their results for the first three months of 2022. A Federal Reserve interest-rate decision and Jobs Friday will be the economic-data highlights of the week.</p><p>The earnings parade begins with Clorox, Devon Energy, Expedia Group, and NXP Semiconductors on Monday, followed by a busy Tuesday: Advanced Micro Devices, Airbnb, Biogen, BP, DuPont, Marathon Petroleum, Paramount Global, Pfizer, and Starbucks all report.</p><p>Wednesday’s highlights will include Booking Holdings, CVS Health, eBay, Etsy, Moderna, and Uber Technologies. Then Anheuser-Busch InBev, ConocoPhillips, Illumina, Royal Caribbean Group, and Shell report on Thursday and Cigna and Under Armour close the week on Friday.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0346f6b43bcae4354ecc6df2af9a04f5\" tg-width=\"1800\" tg-height=\"1430\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>The Federal Open Market Committee concludes a two-day meeting on Wednesday, when it will announce a monetary-policy decision. Market pricing overwhelming implies expectations of an interest-rate increase of half a percentage point, to a Fed Funds target range of 0.75% to 1%.</p><p>Economists will also be closely watching the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ April jobs report on Friday morning. The average forecast is for a gain of 375,000 nonfarm payrolls, compared with an increase of 431,000 in March.</p><p>Other economic data out this week will include the Institute for Supply Management’s Manufacturing Purchasing Managers’ Index for April on Monday, followed by the Services equivalent on Wednesday.</p><p><b>Monday 5/2</b></p><p>Arista Networks, Clorox, Coterra Energy, Devon Energy, Expedia Group, Moody’s, NXP Semiconductors, SolarEdge Technologies, and Williams Cos. report quarterly results.</p><p><b>The Institute for Supply</b> Management releases its Manufacturing Purchasing Managers’ Index for April. Consensus estimate is for a 57.7 reading, roughly even with the March data.</p><p><b>Tuesday 5/3</b></p><p>Advanced Micro Devices, Airbnb, American International Group, Biogen, BP, Cummins, DuPont, Estée Lauder, Marathon Petroleum, Martin Marietta Materials, Molson Coors Beverage, Paramount Global, Pfizer, S&amp;P Global, and Starbucks announce earnings.</p><p><b>The Bureau of Labor</b> Statistics releases the Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey. Economists forecast 11.4 million job openings on the last business day for March, 134,000 more than in February.</p><p><b>Wednesday 5/4</b></p><p><b>ADP releases its</b> National Employment Report for April. Economists forecast that the economy added 350,000 private-sector jobs, after a 455,000 rise in March. The total workforce has passed prepandemic levels.</p><p>AmerisourceBergen, APA, Booking Holdings, CF Industries, Corteva, CVS Health, eBay, Equinor, Etsy, Fortinet, Moderna, Novo Nordisk, Pioneer Natural Resources, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Trane Technologies, Uber Technologies, and Yum! Brands release quarterly results.</p><p><b>The Federal Open Market</b> Committee announces its monetary-policy decision. The FOMC is widely expected to raise the federal-funds rate by half a percentage point to 0.75%-1%. The current Wall Street consensus calls for the federal-funds rate to be at 3%-3.25% by the end of this year, as a hawkish Fed tries to catch up in its fight against the highest inflation readings in four decades.</p><p><b>The ISM releases</b> its Services Purchasing Managers’ Index for April. Expectations are for a 58.5 reading, slightly ahead of March’s 58.3 figure, and well above the 50 level, which indicates growth in the services sector.</p><p><b>Thursday 5/5</b></p><p>Air Products &amp; Chemicals, Anheuser-Busch InBev, Aptiv, Becton Dickinson, Cardinal Health, ConocoPhillips, Illumina, Intercontinental Exchange, Kellogg, McKesson, Metlife, Royal Caribbean Group, Sempra Energy, Shell, Vertex Pharmaceuticals, and Zoetis hold conference calls to discuss earnings.</p><p><b>Friday 5/6</b></p><p>Cigna, Enbridge, NRG Energy, and Under Armour report quarterly results.</p><p><b>The BLS releases</b> the jobs report for April. Economists forecast a gain of 375,000 jobs in nonfarm payrolls, compared with an increase of 431,000 in March. The unemployment rate is expected to remain unchanged at 3.6%, near historical lows. The labor market remains tight, as job openings continues to outpace job seekers.</p></body></html>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>FOMC Decision, April Jobs Numbers, First-Quarter Earnings, and More for Investors to Watch This Week</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFOMC Decision, April Jobs Numbers, First-Quarter Earnings, and More for Investors to Watch This Week\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-05-02 06:30 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.barrons.com/articles/fomc-decision-april-jobs-numbers-first-quarter-earnings-and-more-for-investors-to-watch-this-week-51651431612?mod=hp_LEAD_2><strong>Barrons</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>First-quarter earnings season continues this week, with more than 150 S&P 500 companies scheduled to report their results for the first three months of 2022. A Federal Reserve interest-rate decision ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/fomc-decision-april-jobs-numbers-first-quarter-earnings-and-more-for-investors-to-watch-this-week-51651431612?mod=hp_LEAD_2\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SEDG":"SolarEdge Technologies, Inc.","MRNA":"Moderna, Inc.","ILMN":"Illumina","DVN":"德文能源","BIIB":"渤健公司","CI":"信诺保险","UA":"安德玛公司C类股","PFE":"辉瑞","UAA":"安德玛公司A类股",".DJI":"道琼斯","MPC":"马拉松原油","BKNG":"Booking Holdings","CLX":"高乐氏",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite","UBER":"优步",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","BP":"英国石油","AMD":"美国超微公司","PARA":"Paramount Global","ABNB":"爱彼迎","NXPI":"恩智浦","SBUX":"星巴克","ETSY":"Etsy, Inc.","DD":"杜邦","COP":"康菲石油","RCL":"皇家加勒比邮轮","EBAY":"eBay","RDS.A":"荷兰皇家壳牌石油A类股","CVS":"西维斯健康","EXPE":"Expedia"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/fomc-decision-april-jobs-numbers-first-quarter-earnings-and-more-for-investors-to-watch-this-week-51651431612?mod=hp_LEAD_2","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1176424262","content_text":"First-quarter earnings season continues this week, with more than 150 S&P 500 companies scheduled to report their results for the first three months of 2022. A Federal Reserve interest-rate decision and Jobs Friday will be the economic-data highlights of the week.The earnings parade begins with Clorox, Devon Energy, Expedia Group, and NXP Semiconductors on Monday, followed by a busy Tuesday: Advanced Micro Devices, Airbnb, Biogen, BP, DuPont, Marathon Petroleum, Paramount Global, Pfizer, and Starbucks all report.Wednesday’s highlights will include Booking Holdings, CVS Health, eBay, Etsy, Moderna, and Uber Technologies. Then Anheuser-Busch InBev, ConocoPhillips, Illumina, Royal Caribbean Group, and Shell report on Thursday and Cigna and Under Armour close the week on Friday.The Federal Open Market Committee concludes a two-day meeting on Wednesday, when it will announce a monetary-policy decision. Market pricing overwhelming implies expectations of an interest-rate increase of half a percentage point, to a Fed Funds target range of 0.75% to 1%.Economists will also be closely watching the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ April jobs report on Friday morning. The average forecast is for a gain of 375,000 nonfarm payrolls, compared with an increase of 431,000 in March.Other economic data out this week will include the Institute for Supply Management’s Manufacturing Purchasing Managers’ Index for April on Monday, followed by the Services equivalent on Wednesday.Monday 5/2Arista Networks, Clorox, Coterra Energy, Devon Energy, Expedia Group, Moody’s, NXP Semiconductors, SolarEdge Technologies, and Williams Cos. report quarterly results.The Institute for Supply Management releases its Manufacturing Purchasing Managers’ Index for April. Consensus estimate is for a 57.7 reading, roughly even with the March data.Tuesday 5/3Advanced Micro Devices, Airbnb, American International Group, Biogen, BP, Cummins, DuPont, Estée Lauder, Marathon Petroleum, Martin Marietta Materials, Molson Coors Beverage, Paramount Global, Pfizer, S&P Global, and Starbucks announce earnings.The Bureau of Labor Statistics releases the Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey. Economists forecast 11.4 million job openings on the last business day for March, 134,000 more than in February.Wednesday 5/4ADP releases its National Employment Report for April. Economists forecast that the economy added 350,000 private-sector jobs, after a 455,000 rise in March. The total workforce has passed prepandemic levels.AmerisourceBergen, APA, Booking Holdings, CF Industries, Corteva, CVS Health, eBay, Equinor, Etsy, Fortinet, Moderna, Novo Nordisk, Pioneer Natural Resources, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Trane Technologies, Uber Technologies, and Yum! Brands release quarterly results.The Federal Open Market Committee announces its monetary-policy decision. The FOMC is widely expected to raise the federal-funds rate by half a percentage point to 0.75%-1%. The current Wall Street consensus calls for the federal-funds rate to be at 3%-3.25% by the end of this year, as a hawkish Fed tries to catch up in its fight against the highest inflation readings in four decades.The ISM releases its Services Purchasing Managers’ Index for April. Expectations are for a 58.5 reading, slightly ahead of March’s 58.3 figure, and well above the 50 level, which indicates growth in the services sector.Thursday 5/5Air Products & Chemicals, Anheuser-Busch InBev, Aptiv, Becton Dickinson, Cardinal Health, ConocoPhillips, Illumina, Intercontinental Exchange, Kellogg, McKesson, Metlife, Royal Caribbean Group, Sempra Energy, Shell, Vertex Pharmaceuticals, and Zoetis hold conference calls to discuss earnings.Friday 5/6Cigna, Enbridge, NRG Energy, and Under Armour report quarterly results.The BLS releases the jobs report for April. Economists forecast a gain of 375,000 jobs in nonfarm payrolls, compared with an increase of 431,000 in March. The unemployment rate is expected to remain unchanged at 3.6%, near historical lows. The labor market remains tight, as job openings continues to outpace job seekers.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":276,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9069423247,"gmtCreate":1651341609818,"gmtModify":1676534892070,"author":{"id":"3562758894473836","authorId":"3562758894473836","name":"Kaelyn","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3562758894473836","authorIdStr":"3562758894473836"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[smile]&nbsp;","listText":"[smile]&nbsp;","text":"[smile]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9069423247","repostId":"1191701836","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1191701836","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1651332063,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1191701836?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-04-30 23:21","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Warren Buffett: We Didn't Repurchase Any Berkshire Stock in April","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1191701836","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Warren Buffett hasn't used the market pullback in April to repurchase any shares of Berkshire Hathaw","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Warren Buffett hasn&#39;t used the market pullback in April to repurchase any shares of Berkshire Hathaway, perhaps a signal he expects more volatility ahead amid rising interest rates and nagging inflationary pressures.</p><p>&#34;We haven&#39;t repurchased any shares at all in April,&#34; Buffett said at the Berkshire Hathaway annual meeting on Saturday. &#34;We&#39;re back somewhat to our more lethargic mood, but anything could change for sure.&#34;</p><p>Berkshire has made massive repurchases of Berkshire stock in the past but has also taken years-long breaks from the practice The company repurchased $3.2 billion of its own stock in the first quarter.</p><p>More recently, Berkshire shares haven&#39;t been immune to the broader market pullback.</p><p>Shares of Berkshire&#39;s class A and class B shares are down about 6.2% so far in the month, outperforming the 8% drop in the S&amp;P 500.</p><p>While Buffett has temporarily stopped buying Berkshire shares, he continues to bet big elsewhere.</p><p>Buffett bought $51 billion in stock in the first quarter, according to the company&#39;s latest earnings release.</p><p>The billionaire investor&#39;s empire upped stakes in oil giants <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/OXY\">Occidental Petroleum</a> and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CVX\">Chevron</a> while also investing $4.2 billion to become the largest investor in computing leader <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/HPQ\">HP Inc.</a>.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Warren Buffett: We Didn't Repurchase Any Berkshire Stock in April</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWarren Buffett: We Didn't Repurchase Any Berkshire Stock in April\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-04-30 23:21</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>Warren Buffett hasn&#39;t used the market pullback in April to repurchase any shares of Berkshire Hathaway, perhaps a signal he expects more volatility ahead amid rising interest rates and nagging inflationary pressures.</p><p>&#34;We haven&#39;t repurchased any shares at all in April,&#34; Buffett said at the Berkshire Hathaway annual meeting on Saturday. &#34;We&#39;re back somewhat to our more lethargic mood, but anything could change for sure.&#34;</p><p>Berkshire has made massive repurchases of Berkshire stock in the past but has also taken years-long breaks from the practice The company repurchased $3.2 billion of its own stock in the first quarter.</p><p>More recently, Berkshire shares haven&#39;t been immune to the broader market pullback.</p><p>Shares of Berkshire&#39;s class A and class B shares are down about 6.2% so far in the month, outperforming the 8% drop in the S&amp;P 500.</p><p>While Buffett has temporarily stopped buying Berkshire shares, he continues to bet big elsewhere.</p><p>Buffett bought $51 billion in stock in the first quarter, according to the company&#39;s latest earnings release.</p><p>The billionaire investor&#39;s empire upped stakes in oil giants <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/OXY\">Occidental Petroleum</a> and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CVX\">Chevron</a> while also investing $4.2 billion to become the largest investor in computing leader <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/HPQ\">HP Inc.</a>.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BRK.A":"伯克希尔","BRK.B":"伯克希尔B"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1191701836","content_text":"Warren Buffett hasn't used the market pullback in April to repurchase any shares of Berkshire Hathaway, perhaps a signal he expects more volatility ahead amid rising interest rates and nagging inflationary pressures.\"We haven't repurchased any shares at all in April,\" Buffett said at the Berkshire Hathaway annual meeting on Saturday. \"We're back somewhat to our more lethargic mood, but anything could change for sure.\"Berkshire has made massive repurchases of Berkshire stock in the past but has also taken years-long breaks from the practice The company repurchased $3.2 billion of its own stock in the first quarter.More recently, Berkshire shares haven't been immune to the broader market pullback.Shares of Berkshire's class A and class B shares are down about 6.2% so far in the month, outperforming the 8% drop in the S&P 500.While Buffett has temporarily stopped buying Berkshire shares, he continues to bet big elsewhere.Buffett bought $51 billion in stock in the first quarter, according to the company's latest earnings release.The billionaire investor's empire upped stakes in oil giants Occidental Petroleum and Chevron while also investing $4.2 billion to become the largest investor in computing leader HP Inc..","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":175,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9069957155,"gmtCreate":1651223310743,"gmtModify":1676534873730,"author":{"id":"3562758894473836","authorId":"3562758894473836","name":"Kaelyn","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3562758894473836","authorIdStr":"3562758894473836"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[smile]&nbsp;","listText":"[smile]&nbsp;","text":"[smile]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9069957155","repostId":"2231140356","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2231140356","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1651221958,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2231140356?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-04-29 16:45","market":"sh","language":"en","title":"Tesla Recalls Another Batch of Model 3 Cars in China, the Second in April","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2231140356","media":"Reuters","summary":"SHANGHAI, April 29 (Reuters) - Tesla Inc is recalling 14,684 imported and locally made Model 3 cars ","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>SHANGHAI, April 29 (Reuters) - Tesla Inc is recalling 14,684 imported and locally made Model 3 cars in China on problems with software that could lead to collisions, the country&#39;s market regulator said, the second batch of recalls for the U.S. car maker in April.</p><p>Tesla will recall the Model 3 Performance cars manufactured between January 2019 to March 2022, including 1,850 cars that were imported and 12,834 made in China, according to a statement on Friday from the State Administration for Market Regulation.</p><p>The cars being recalled do not show a unit for the speed numbers under Track Mode, which could mislead drivers and lead to collisions under extreme circumstances, the regulator said.</p><p>The regulator said earlier in April that the electric vehicle maker would recall 127,785 units of Model 3 cars for potential faults in semiconductor components that might lead to collisions.</p><p>Tesla declined to comment on the regulator&#39;s announcements.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Tesla Recalls Another Batch of Model 3 Cars in China, the Second in April</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTesla Recalls Another Batch of Model 3 Cars in China, the Second in April\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-04-29 16:45</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>SHANGHAI, April 29 (Reuters) - Tesla Inc is recalling 14,684 imported and locally made Model 3 cars in China on problems with software that could lead to collisions, the country&#39;s market regulator said, the second batch of recalls for the U.S. car maker in April.</p><p>Tesla will recall the Model 3 Performance cars manufactured between January 2019 to March 2022, including 1,850 cars that were imported and 12,834 made in China, according to a statement on Friday from the State Administration for Market Regulation.</p><p>The cars being recalled do not show a unit for the speed numbers under Track Mode, which could mislead drivers and lead to collisions under extreme circumstances, the regulator said.</p><p>The regulator said earlier in April that the electric vehicle maker would recall 127,785 units of Model 3 cars for potential faults in semiconductor components that might lead to collisions.</p><p>Tesla declined to comment on the regulator&#39;s announcements.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2231140356","content_text":"SHANGHAI, April 29 (Reuters) - Tesla Inc is recalling 14,684 imported and locally made Model 3 cars in China on problems with software that could lead to collisions, the country's market regulator said, the second batch of recalls for the U.S. car maker in April.Tesla will recall the Model 3 Performance cars manufactured between January 2019 to March 2022, including 1,850 cars that were imported and 12,834 made in China, according to a statement on Friday from the State Administration for Market Regulation.The cars being recalled do not show a unit for the speed numbers under Track Mode, which could mislead drivers and lead to collisions under extreme circumstances, the regulator said.The regulator said earlier in April that the electric vehicle maker would recall 127,785 units of Model 3 cars for potential faults in semiconductor components that might lead to collisions.Tesla declined to comment on the regulator's announcements.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":293,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9060263571,"gmtCreate":1651155273818,"gmtModify":1676534860161,"author":{"id":"3562758894473836","authorId":"3562758894473836","name":"Kaelyn","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3562758894473836","authorIdStr":"3562758894473836"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[smile]&nbsp;","listText":"[smile]&nbsp;","text":"[smile]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9060263571","repostId":"2230454741","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2230454741","pubTimestamp":1651132673,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2230454741?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-04-28 15:57","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Palantir Technologies Stock: Bear vs. Bull","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2230454741","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"The data-mining firm is still a polarizing investment.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>Palantir Technologies&#39;</b> stock took investors on a wild ride after it went public via a direct listing on Sept. 30, 2020. The data-mining firm&#39;s shares started trading at $10, closed at an all-time high of $39 last January, but subsequently tumbled all the way back to about $12 a share.</p><p>Does that pullback represent a good buying opportunity for patient investors? Let&#39;s review the bull and bear cases to decide.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5a745be90180fb00049b4e1dd3a5ed89\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"393\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>Image source: Getty Images.</span></p><h2>What does Palantir do?</h2><p>Palantir operates two main software platforms: Gotham, which serves government clients; and Foundry, which serves large enterprises and private organizations. A third platform, Apollo, provides automatic software updates for both platforms as a cloud-based service.</p><p>Palantir&#39;s software aggregates data from disparate sources and then analyzes it with artificial intelligence algorithms to help organizations make informed decisions. For example, the U.S. Army uses Gotham to collect intel from various government agencies and local sources to plan missions. Large companies can also use its algorithms to streamline their operations.</p><h2>Why do the bulls love Palantir?</h2><p>The bulls love Palantir because it has firm ties to the U.S. government, it generates robust growth, and its gross margins are expanding.</p><p>Palantir&#39;s revenue rose 47% in 2020, then grew 41% to $1.54 billion in 2021. It ended 2021 with a high dollar-based net retention rate of 131%, and it expects its revenue to grow by at least 30% annually through 2025.</p><p>Its government revenue in 2021 rose 34% to $645 million, but it still decelerated from its 77% growth in 2020. However, its commercial revenue in 2021 increased 47% to $897 million, which accelerated from its 22% growth in 2020.</p><p>The acceleration of its commercial business silenced the bears who initially claimed Palantir would struggle against similar data-mining companies like <b>C3.ai</b>, <b>Alteryx</b>, and <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CRM\">Salesforce</a></b> in the crowded enterprise analytics market.</p><p>The bulls also believe its government slowdown is temporary since it still secured plenty of new deals over the past year. In addition, Ukraine war could generate fresh tailwinds for Gotham as more government agencies upgrade their analytics systems to counter the threat of new cyberattacks and military aggression across Europe.</p><p>Palantir&#39;s adjusted gross margin rose from 71% in 2019 to 81% in 2020, then increased to 82% in 2021. That ongoing expansion indicates it still has plenty of pricing power in the data mining and analytics market.</p><h2>Why do the bears hate Palantir?</h2><p>The bears dislike Palantir because it faces a hidden competitor within the U.S. government, it&#39;s unprofitable, and its stock still isn&#39;t cheap.</p><p>Palantir has a controversial reputation because its co-founder Peter Thiel was a vocal supporter of former President Donald Trump. Immigration and Customs Enforcement&#39;s (ICE) usage of Gotham to deport undocumented immigrants also sparked internal protests and resignations across the company.</p><p>Those controversies, along with long-term cost concerns, have reportedly driven ICE to develop its own internal replacement for Gotham called RAVEn. If other U.S. government agencies follow ICE&#39;s lead, Palantir&#39;s dream of becoming the &#34;default operating system for data across the U.S. government&#34; (which it boldly set in its S-1 filing) could quickly end.</p><p>Palantir&#39;s net loss widened from $580 million in 2019 to $1.17 billion in 2020, partly due to the costs of its direct listing, and narrowed to $520 million in 2021. That red ink makes Palantir a risky stock to own as interest rates rise.</p><p>Palantir&#39;s stock has nearly taken a round trip back to its initial opening price, but it still isn&#39;t undervalued at 12 times this year&#39;s sales. By comparison, <b>Twilio </b>(TWLO -6.26%) -- the cloud-based communications company which expects to generate at least 30% organic revenue growth over the next few years -- trades at just six times this year&#39;s sales.</p><p>To make matter worse, Palantir continues to dilute its shares with its generous stock-based compensation (50% of its revenue in 2021) as its insiders cash out. On a weighted-average basis, Palantir&#39;s outstanding shares nearly doubled in 2021. Yet over the past three months, its insiders sold more than twice as many shares as they purchased.</p><h2>The bears still have the upper hand</h2><p>Palantir&#39;s business should continue to grow at an impressive clip this year, but its ongoing losses, dilution, and insider sales indicate its stock could still drop even further in this challenging market. Therefore, I believe investors should avoid Palantir until its price-to-sales ratio drops to the single digits.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Palantir Technologies Stock: Bear vs. Bull</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nPalantir Technologies Stock: Bear vs. Bull\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-04-28 15:57 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/04/27/palantir-technologies-stock-bear-vs-bull/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Palantir Technologies' stock took investors on a wild ride after it went public via a direct listing on Sept. 30, 2020. The data-mining firm's shares started trading at $10, closed at an all-time high...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/04/27/palantir-technologies-stock-bear-vs-bull/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"PLTR":"Palantir Technologies Inc."},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/04/27/palantir-technologies-stock-bear-vs-bull/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2230454741","content_text":"Palantir Technologies' stock took investors on a wild ride after it went public via a direct listing on Sept. 30, 2020. The data-mining firm's shares started trading at $10, closed at an all-time high of $39 last January, but subsequently tumbled all the way back to about $12 a share.Does that pullback represent a good buying opportunity for patient investors? Let's review the bull and bear cases to decide.Image source: Getty Images.What does Palantir do?Palantir operates two main software platforms: Gotham, which serves government clients; and Foundry, which serves large enterprises and private organizations. A third platform, Apollo, provides automatic software updates for both platforms as a cloud-based service.Palantir's software aggregates data from disparate sources and then analyzes it with artificial intelligence algorithms to help organizations make informed decisions. For example, the U.S. Army uses Gotham to collect intel from various government agencies and local sources to plan missions. Large companies can also use its algorithms to streamline their operations.Why do the bulls love Palantir?The bulls love Palantir because it has firm ties to the U.S. government, it generates robust growth, and its gross margins are expanding.Palantir's revenue rose 47% in 2020, then grew 41% to $1.54 billion in 2021. It ended 2021 with a high dollar-based net retention rate of 131%, and it expects its revenue to grow by at least 30% annually through 2025.Its government revenue in 2021 rose 34% to $645 million, but it still decelerated from its 77% growth in 2020. However, its commercial revenue in 2021 increased 47% to $897 million, which accelerated from its 22% growth in 2020.The acceleration of its commercial business silenced the bears who initially claimed Palantir would struggle against similar data-mining companies like C3.ai, Alteryx, and Salesforce in the crowded enterprise analytics market.The bulls also believe its government slowdown is temporary since it still secured plenty of new deals over the past year. In addition, Ukraine war could generate fresh tailwinds for Gotham as more government agencies upgrade their analytics systems to counter the threat of new cyberattacks and military aggression across Europe.Palantir's adjusted gross margin rose from 71% in 2019 to 81% in 2020, then increased to 82% in 2021. That ongoing expansion indicates it still has plenty of pricing power in the data mining and analytics market.Why do the bears hate Palantir?The bears dislike Palantir because it faces a hidden competitor within the U.S. government, it's unprofitable, and its stock still isn't cheap.Palantir has a controversial reputation because its co-founder Peter Thiel was a vocal supporter of former President Donald Trump. Immigration and Customs Enforcement's (ICE) usage of Gotham to deport undocumented immigrants also sparked internal protests and resignations across the company.Those controversies, along with long-term cost concerns, have reportedly driven ICE to develop its own internal replacement for Gotham called RAVEn. If other U.S. government agencies follow ICE's lead, Palantir's dream of becoming the \"default operating system for data across the U.S. government\" (which it boldly set in its S-1 filing) could quickly end.Palantir's net loss widened from $580 million in 2019 to $1.17 billion in 2020, partly due to the costs of its direct listing, and narrowed to $520 million in 2021. That red ink makes Palantir a risky stock to own as interest rates rise.Palantir's stock has nearly taken a round trip back to its initial opening price, but it still isn't undervalued at 12 times this year's sales. By comparison, Twilio (TWLO -6.26%) -- the cloud-based communications company which expects to generate at least 30% organic revenue growth over the next few years -- trades at just six times this year's sales.To make matter worse, Palantir continues to dilute its shares with its generous stock-based compensation (50% of its revenue in 2021) as its insiders cash out. On a weighted-average basis, Palantir's outstanding shares nearly doubled in 2021. Yet over the past three months, its insiders sold more than twice as many shares as they purchased.The bears still have the upper handPalantir's business should continue to grow at an impressive clip this year, but its ongoing losses, dilution, and insider sales indicate its stock could still drop even further in this challenging market. Therefore, I believe investors should avoid Palantir until its price-to-sales ratio drops to the single digits.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":269,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9087151496,"gmtCreate":1650979960165,"gmtModify":1676534826314,"author":{"id":"3562758894473836","authorId":"3562758894473836","name":"Kaelyn","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3562758894473836","authorIdStr":"3562758894473836"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[smile]&nbsp;","listText":"[smile]&nbsp;","text":"[smile]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9087151496","repostId":"1117287551","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":136,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9086390601,"gmtCreate":1650413795375,"gmtModify":1676534717560,"author":{"id":"3562758894473836","authorId":"3562758894473836","name":"Kaelyn","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3562758894473836","authorIdStr":"3562758894473836"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[smile]&nbsp;","listText":"[smile]&nbsp;","text":"[smile]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9086390601","repostId":"2228916468","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2228916468","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1650410146,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2228916468?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-04-20 07:15","market":"us","language":"en","title":"US STOCKS-Wall Street Ends Higher as Earnings Optimism Outshines Rising Yields","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2228916468","media":"Reuters","summary":"* U.S. 30-year bond yield hits 3%* IMF cuts global growth forecast for 2022* J&J hits record high after earningsApril 19 (Reuters) - U.S. stocks ended higher on Tuesday, as investors used positive ear","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>* U.S. 30-year bond yield hits 3%</p><p>* IMF cuts global growth forecast for 2022</p><p>* J&amp;J hits record high after earnings</p><p>April 19 (Reuters) - U.S. stocks ended higher on Tuesday, as investors used positive earnings to advance Wall Street&#39;s main indexes and took relief from two U.S. Federal Reserve officials offering more dovish comments on interest rate rises than <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> of their counterparts.</p><p>Shares of megacap companies, including Microsoft Corp, Apple Inc and Amazon.com Inc, rose even as Treasury yields extended a recent surge.</p><p>Johnson &amp; Johnson advanced to a record high, before pulling back slightly, as its quarterly profit exceeded market expectations and it raised its dividend payout.</p><p>Of the 49 companies in the S&amp;P 500 index that have reported quarterly earnings so far, 79.6% have exceeded profit estimates, as per Refinitiv data. Typically, 66% beat estimates.</p><p>&#34;It certainly feels like every earnings season, especially since March 2020, is more important than the next, but particularly given where we sit in the economic cycle, the Fed&#39;s rate hike cycle, and the elevated inflation backdrop,&#34; said Max Grinacoff, equity derivatives strategist at <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BNPQF\">BNP Paribas</a>.</p><p>&#34;So it all comes down to whether corporate earnings will remain resilient, in the face of what we have seen year-to-date geopolitically and with the U.S. economic picture. It will be a true test.&#34;</p><p>St. Louis Federal Reserve Bank President James Bullard on Monday repeated his case for increasing the rates to 3.5% by the end of the year to slow a 40-year-high inflation. He also said he did not rule out a 75 basis points rate hike.</p><p>Stocks appeared to brush aside the remarks, and the main indexes rallied further in late afternoon trading after both Chicago Federal Reserve Bank President Charles Evans and Atlanta Federal Reserve Bank President Raphael Bostic offered more dovish comments.</p><p>Bond yields continued their recent moves higher though. The 30-year yield exceeded 3% for the first time since April 2019. The 10-year tips &lt; US10YTIP=RR&gt; yield turned positive for the first time since March 2020, the start of the coronavirus pandemic.</p><p>&#34;We typically assume higher yields should be beneficial for banks, but that correlation has broken down a bit and it&#39;s been the sectors most negatively-correlated to rising rates - defensive sectors - which have actually rallied,&#34; said BNP&#39;s Grinacoff.</p><p>&#34;We do think that is due to some recessionary fears starting to be priced in.&#34;</p><p>According to preliminary data, the S&amp;P 500 gained 72.36 points, or 1.65%, to end at 4,464.05 points, while the Nasdaq Composite gained 287.13 points, or 2.15%, to 13,619.49. The Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 519.57 points, or 1.51%, to 34,931.26.</p><p>Most of the 11 major S&amp;P subsectors were higher, led by consumer discretionary stocks. Among the best performers in the index were gaming companies, with Wynn Resorts Inc, Caesars Entertainment Inc and Penn National Gaming Inc all posting strong gains.</p><p>Energy stocks fell as oil prices tumbled 5.2% after the International Monetary Fund cut its growth forecasts for the global economy and warned of higher inflation.</p><p>This year&#39;s rally in crude prices, which are still up around a third despite Tuesday&#39;s declines, helped Halliburton Co post an 85% rise in first-quarter adjusted profit as demand for its services and equipment increased. However, the oilfield services firm&#39;s shares were lower, amid the wider slump in energy stocks.</p><p>Travelers Cos Inc also fell, despite the property and casualty insurer posting a better-than-expected quarterly profit.</p><p>Meanwhile, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TWTR\">Twitter</a> Inc declined. More private equity firms have expressed interest in participating in a deal for the micro blogging site, according to reports.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>US STOCKS-Wall Street Ends Higher as Earnings Optimism Outshines Rising Yields</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nUS STOCKS-Wall Street Ends Higher as Earnings Optimism Outshines Rising Yields\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-04-20 07:15</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>* U.S. 30-year bond yield hits 3%</p><p>* IMF cuts global growth forecast for 2022</p><p>* J&amp;J hits record high after earnings</p><p>April 19 (Reuters) - U.S. stocks ended higher on Tuesday, as investors used positive earnings to advance Wall Street&#39;s main indexes and took relief from two U.S. Federal Reserve officials offering more dovish comments on interest rate rises than <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> of their counterparts.</p><p>Shares of megacap companies, including Microsoft Corp, Apple Inc and Amazon.com Inc, rose even as Treasury yields extended a recent surge.</p><p>Johnson &amp; Johnson advanced to a record high, before pulling back slightly, as its quarterly profit exceeded market expectations and it raised its dividend payout.</p><p>Of the 49 companies in the S&amp;P 500 index that have reported quarterly earnings so far, 79.6% have exceeded profit estimates, as per Refinitiv data. Typically, 66% beat estimates.</p><p>&#34;It certainly feels like every earnings season, especially since March 2020, is more important than the next, but particularly given where we sit in the economic cycle, the Fed&#39;s rate hike cycle, and the elevated inflation backdrop,&#34; said Max Grinacoff, equity derivatives strategist at <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BNPQF\">BNP Paribas</a>.</p><p>&#34;So it all comes down to whether corporate earnings will remain resilient, in the face of what we have seen year-to-date geopolitically and with the U.S. economic picture. It will be a true test.&#34;</p><p>St. Louis Federal Reserve Bank President James Bullard on Monday repeated his case for increasing the rates to 3.5% by the end of the year to slow a 40-year-high inflation. He also said he did not rule out a 75 basis points rate hike.</p><p>Stocks appeared to brush aside the remarks, and the main indexes rallied further in late afternoon trading after both Chicago Federal Reserve Bank President Charles Evans and Atlanta Federal Reserve Bank President Raphael Bostic offered more dovish comments.</p><p>Bond yields continued their recent moves higher though. The 30-year yield exceeded 3% for the first time since April 2019. The 10-year tips &lt; US10YTIP=RR&gt; yield turned positive for the first time since March 2020, the start of the coronavirus pandemic.</p><p>&#34;We typically assume higher yields should be beneficial for banks, but that correlation has broken down a bit and it&#39;s been the sectors most negatively-correlated to rising rates - defensive sectors - which have actually rallied,&#34; said BNP&#39;s Grinacoff.</p><p>&#34;We do think that is due to some recessionary fears starting to be priced in.&#34;</p><p>According to preliminary data, the S&amp;P 500 gained 72.36 points, or 1.65%, to end at 4,464.05 points, while the Nasdaq Composite gained 287.13 points, or 2.15%, to 13,619.49. The Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 519.57 points, or 1.51%, to 34,931.26.</p><p>Most of the 11 major S&amp;P subsectors were higher, led by consumer discretionary stocks. Among the best performers in the index were gaming companies, with Wynn Resorts Inc, Caesars Entertainment Inc and Penn National Gaming Inc all posting strong gains.</p><p>Energy stocks fell as oil prices tumbled 5.2% after the International Monetary Fund cut its growth forecasts for the global economy and warned of higher inflation.</p><p>This year&#39;s rally in crude prices, which are still up around a third despite Tuesday&#39;s declines, helped Halliburton Co post an 85% rise in first-quarter adjusted profit as demand for its services and equipment increased. However, the oilfield services firm&#39;s shares were lower, amid the wider slump in energy stocks.</p><p>Travelers Cos Inc also fell, despite the property and casualty insurer posting a better-than-expected quarterly profit.</p><p>Meanwhile, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TWTR\">Twitter</a> Inc declined. More private equity firms have expressed interest in participating in a deal for the micro blogging site, according to reports.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BAC":"美国银行","TWTR":"Twitter","WYNN":"永利度假村","AMZN":"亚马逊","AAPL":"苹果","MSFT":"微软","TRV":"旅行者财产险集团",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","PENN":"佩恩国民博彩",".DJI":"道琼斯","NFLX":"奈飞","WFC":"富国银行",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite","JNJ":"强生","CZR":"凯撒娱乐","HAL":"哈里伯顿","IBM":"IBM"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2228916468","content_text":"* U.S. 30-year bond yield hits 3%* IMF cuts global growth forecast for 2022* J&J hits record high after earningsApril 19 (Reuters) - U.S. stocks ended higher on Tuesday, as investors used positive earnings to advance Wall Street's main indexes and took relief from two U.S. Federal Reserve officials offering more dovish comments on interest rate rises than one of their counterparts.Shares of megacap companies, including Microsoft Corp, Apple Inc and Amazon.com Inc, rose even as Treasury yields extended a recent surge.Johnson & Johnson advanced to a record high, before pulling back slightly, as its quarterly profit exceeded market expectations and it raised its dividend payout.Of the 49 companies in the S&P 500 index that have reported quarterly earnings so far, 79.6% have exceeded profit estimates, as per Refinitiv data. Typically, 66% beat estimates.\"It certainly feels like every earnings season, especially since March 2020, is more important than the next, but particularly given where we sit in the economic cycle, the Fed's rate hike cycle, and the elevated inflation backdrop,\" said Max Grinacoff, equity derivatives strategist at BNP Paribas.\"So it all comes down to whether corporate earnings will remain resilient, in the face of what we have seen year-to-date geopolitically and with the U.S. economic picture. It will be a true test.\"St. Louis Federal Reserve Bank President James Bullard on Monday repeated his case for increasing the rates to 3.5% by the end of the year to slow a 40-year-high inflation. He also said he did not rule out a 75 basis points rate hike.Stocks appeared to brush aside the remarks, and the main indexes rallied further in late afternoon trading after both Chicago Federal Reserve Bank President Charles Evans and Atlanta Federal Reserve Bank President Raphael Bostic offered more dovish comments.Bond yields continued their recent moves higher though. The 30-year yield exceeded 3% for the first time since April 2019. The 10-year tips < US10YTIP=RR> yield turned positive for the first time since March 2020, the start of the coronavirus pandemic.\"We typically assume higher yields should be beneficial for banks, but that correlation has broken down a bit and it's been the sectors most negatively-correlated to rising rates - defensive sectors - which have actually rallied,\" said BNP's Grinacoff.\"We do think that is due to some recessionary fears starting to be priced in.\"According to preliminary data, the S&P 500 gained 72.36 points, or 1.65%, to end at 4,464.05 points, while the Nasdaq Composite gained 287.13 points, or 2.15%, to 13,619.49. The Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 519.57 points, or 1.51%, to 34,931.26.Most of the 11 major S&P subsectors were higher, led by consumer discretionary stocks. Among the best performers in the index were gaming companies, with Wynn Resorts Inc, Caesars Entertainment Inc and Penn National Gaming Inc all posting strong gains.Energy stocks fell as oil prices tumbled 5.2% after the International Monetary Fund cut its growth forecasts for the global economy and warned of higher inflation.This year's rally in crude prices, which are still up around a third despite Tuesday's declines, helped Halliburton Co post an 85% rise in first-quarter adjusted profit as demand for its services and equipment increased. However, the oilfield services firm's shares were lower, amid the wider slump in energy stocks.Travelers Cos Inc also fell, despite the property and casualty insurer posting a better-than-expected quarterly profit.Meanwhile, Twitter Inc declined. More private equity firms have expressed interest in participating in a deal for the micro blogging site, according to reports.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":179,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9088600971,"gmtCreate":1650334214942,"gmtModify":1676534699115,"author":{"id":"3562758894473836","authorId":"3562758894473836","name":"Kaelyn","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3562758894473836","authorIdStr":"3562758894473836"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[smile]&nbsp;","listText":"[smile]&nbsp;","text":"[smile]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9088600971","repostId":"1136222475","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1136222475","pubTimestamp":1650333685,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1136222475?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-04-19 10:01","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Dear TSLA Stock Fans, Mark Your Calendars for April 20","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1136222475","media":"InvestorPlace","summary":"Tesla is getting ready for its next earnings callTesla is roughly 48 hours away from reporting earnings for the first quarter of 2022 on Wednesday, April 20. As this key catalyst approaches, TSLA stock continues to experience volatility.It has been a turbulent time since the electric vehicle  innovator’s last earnings report. Factoring in both bad and good news and Elon Musk’s current preoccupation with acquiringTwitter, there has simply been a lot going on.Now, Wall Street is bracing to see jus","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Tesla is getting ready for its next earnings call</p><p><b>Tesla</b>(NASDAQ:<b><u>TSLA</u></b>) is roughly 48 hours away from reporting earnings for the first quarter of 2022 on Wednesday, April 20. As this key catalyst approaches, TSLA stock continues to experience volatility.</p><p>It has been a turbulent time since the electric vehicle (EV) innovator’s last earnings report. Factoring in both bad and good news and Elon Musk’s current preoccupation with acquiring <b>Twitter</b>(NYSE:<b><u>TWTR</u></b>), there has simply been a lot going on.</p><p>Now, Wall Street is bracing to see just how good of a quarter Tesla has had through it all.</p><p><b>What’s Happening with TSLA Stock?</b></p><p>This Tesla earnings report is particularly important because investors are so unsure what to expect. While some experts feel the bullish case for TSLA stock remains as strong as ever, other skeptics aren’t so certain. Demand certainly hasn’t been a problem. Rising gas prices have nudged more Americans toward purchasing EVs. In fact, <i>CleanTechnica</i> reports that electric vehicle sales may come close to doubling in 2022. EV demand has also been rising throughout Europe where Tesla is working hard to secure a larger market share.</p><p>Rising demand has raised some questions regarding supply, though.</p><p>Since the supply chain crisis began, though, Tesla has found ways to meet production goals. The company recent confirmed that it had set a new sales record for the first quarter of the year. That statistic alone should reassure Tesla investors that the company is on track to keep growing. But where exactly will things fall in Q1? Tesla is navigating somewhat of a balancing act between factory shutdowns in Shanghai and newly opened factories in Berlin, Germany and Austin, Texas.</p><p>Investors should also note that Tesla has done an impressive job generating momentum in Q1. The recent Cyber Rodeo in Austin set the internet buzzing as Musk provided updates on the Cybertruck and Tesla Roadster. While neither vehicle will be on the road until 2023, history has taught us that the buzz around them is often enough to send TSLA stock up. Musk has also made it clear he has no intentions of retreating.</p><p><b>What Comes Next</b></p><p>Lastly, it is important to note that Wall Street continues to believe in Tesla. The analysts who were bullish prior to the year’s first earnings call maintain high price targets and “buy” ratings. This list includes Dan Ives of Wedbush, Adam Jonas of Morgan Stanley and Alexander Potter of Piper Sandler. As <i>InvestorPlace</i> contributor Joel Baglole notes, analysts are expecting earnings per share of $2.26 on revenue of $17.76 billion.</p><p>Investors already know that Tesla has had an impressive sales quarter. While TSLA stock has seen plenty of turbulence, there’s no reason to suspect that Wednesday’s call will bring anything too concerning. If anything, it should provide another sign that Musk and Tesla will keep pushing ahead.</p></body></html>","source":"lsy1606302653667","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Dear TSLA Stock Fans, Mark Your Calendars for April 20</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nDear TSLA Stock Fans, Mark Your Calendars for April 20\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-04-19 10:01 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://investorplace.com/2022/04/dear-tsla-stock-fans-mark-your-calendars-for-april-20/><strong>InvestorPlace</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Tesla is getting ready for its next earnings callTesla(NASDAQ:TSLA) is roughly 48 hours away from reporting earnings for the first quarter of 2022 on Wednesday, April 20. As this key catalyst ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://investorplace.com/2022/04/dear-tsla-stock-fans-mark-your-calendars-for-april-20/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"https://investorplace.com/2022/04/dear-tsla-stock-fans-mark-your-calendars-for-april-20/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1136222475","content_text":"Tesla is getting ready for its next earnings callTesla(NASDAQ:TSLA) is roughly 48 hours away from reporting earnings for the first quarter of 2022 on Wednesday, April 20. As this key catalyst approaches, TSLA stock continues to experience volatility.It has been a turbulent time since the electric vehicle (EV) innovator’s last earnings report. Factoring in both bad and good news and Elon Musk’s current preoccupation with acquiring Twitter(NYSE:TWTR), there has simply been a lot going on.Now, Wall Street is bracing to see just how good of a quarter Tesla has had through it all.What’s Happening with TSLA Stock?This Tesla earnings report is particularly important because investors are so unsure what to expect. While some experts feel the bullish case for TSLA stock remains as strong as ever, other skeptics aren’t so certain. Demand certainly hasn’t been a problem. Rising gas prices have nudged more Americans toward purchasing EVs. In fact, CleanTechnica reports that electric vehicle sales may come close to doubling in 2022. EV demand has also been rising throughout Europe where Tesla is working hard to secure a larger market share.Rising demand has raised some questions regarding supply, though.Since the supply chain crisis began, though, Tesla has found ways to meet production goals. The company recent confirmed that it had set a new sales record for the first quarter of the year. That statistic alone should reassure Tesla investors that the company is on track to keep growing. But where exactly will things fall in Q1? Tesla is navigating somewhat of a balancing act between factory shutdowns in Shanghai and newly opened factories in Berlin, Germany and Austin, Texas.Investors should also note that Tesla has done an impressive job generating momentum in Q1. The recent Cyber Rodeo in Austin set the internet buzzing as Musk provided updates on the Cybertruck and Tesla Roadster. While neither vehicle will be on the road until 2023, history has taught us that the buzz around them is often enough to send TSLA stock up. Musk has also made it clear he has no intentions of retreating.What Comes NextLastly, it is important to note that Wall Street continues to believe in Tesla. The analysts who were bullish prior to the year’s first earnings call maintain high price targets and “buy” ratings. This list includes Dan Ives of Wedbush, Adam Jonas of Morgan Stanley and Alexander Potter of Piper Sandler. As InvestorPlace contributor Joel Baglole notes, analysts are expecting earnings per share of $2.26 on revenue of $17.76 billion.Investors already know that Tesla has had an impressive sales quarter. While TSLA stock has seen plenty of turbulence, there’s no reason to suspect that Wednesday’s call will bring anything too concerning. If anything, it should provide another sign that Musk and Tesla will keep pushing ahead.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":212,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9088877533,"gmtCreate":1650334201712,"gmtModify":1676534699122,"author":{"id":"3562758894473836","authorId":"3562758894473836","name":"Kaelyn","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3562758894473836","authorIdStr":"3562758894473836"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[smile]&nbsp;","listText":"[smile]&nbsp;","text":"[smile]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9088877533","repostId":"1105840721","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1105840721","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1650324260,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1105840721?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-04-19 07:24","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Netflix Q1 Earnings are Coming: 3 Most Important Things to Watch","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1105840721","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX) is scheduled to announce Q1 earnings results after market closes on Tuesday, A","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX) is scheduled to announce Q1 earnings results after market closes on Tuesday, April 19.</p><p><b>Latest Results</b></p><p>In Q4 2021, Netflix added 8.28 million net new subscribers, a bit shy of the company&#39;s own forecast for 8.5 million net adds, and about in line with the Wall Street consensus forecast at 8.3 million. The company now has 221.8 million subscribers globally.</p><p>The company generated Q4 revenue of $7.7 billion, up 16%, and in line with the company&#39;s projection at $7.7 billion. Profits were $1.33 cents a share, well ahead of analysts at 83 cents, with the outperformance mostly due to an unrealized gain tied to the company&#39;s euro denominated debt.</p><p><b>Q1 Guidance</b></p><p>Netflix&#39;s projections for Q1 2022 were even lighter. The management&#39;s guidance is projecting 2.5 million net adds. While analysts on average predict 2.81 million in Q1, and 2.64 million in Q2, according to FactSet.</p><p>It sees Q1 revenue of $7.9 billion, up 10.3%, but well shy of the Street consensus at $8.2 billion.</p><p><b>3</b> <b>Most Important Things to Watch</b></p><p>1. Subscriber additions</p><p>As always, an important focus for investors will be Netflix&#39;s net paid subscriber additions. In Q3, Netflix saw a re-acceleration in its quarterly subscriber growth, as net additions came in at 8.3 million. Though this was notably below the 8.5 million net new subscribers the company had estimated it would add during the quarter, it was still good to see a significant sequential uptick from the 4.4 million members the company added in the prior quarter.</p><p>But what likely spooked investors was management&#39;s guidance for just 2.5 million net new paid subscribers inQ1 2022. This would be down significantly from the 4.0 million the company added inQ1 2021. This weak outlook, management explained, reflects the quarter&#39;s back-end weighted content slate.</p><p>2. Commentary on competition</p><p>Another red flag for Netflix investors in Q4 was management&#39;s nod to increasing competition. In a rare acknowledgment of competition having a negative impact on the company, management said, &#34;added competition may be affecting our marginal growth some...&#34;</p><p>Investors should look to see if management doubles down on this worrisome narrative or if it brings positive data points to the table regarding how it is faring in a competitive environment. Chances are, the worrisome remarks about competition will continue. But investors should note that the stock&#39;s big decline has arguably priced in expectations for heated competition going forward.</p><p>3. Subscriber-growth guidance</p><p>Of course, another key metric to watch will be the company&#39;s guidance for subscriber growth inQ2 2022. Technically, a back-weighted content slate in Q1 should positively impact Q2. Further, it&#39;s no secret that content production has been ramping back up from periods when much of the world was facing lockdowns. So lots of new content from Netflix should provide a catalyst for reaccelerated subscriber growth, assuming increasing competition isn&#39;t providing too much negative pressure.</p><p>While it&#39;s always tough to estimate how many subscribers Netflix will guide for, it would be nice to see guidance for second-quarter subscriber levels on par with pre-COVID levels again. To do this, the company would need to guide for around 2.7 million new subscribers in Q2.</p><p><b>Analyst Opinions</b></p><p>Truist analyst Matthew Thornton cut the price target of Netflix to $409 from $470.Thornton said in a research note that based on mobile app downloads, he believes the company&#39;s subscriber numbers in the first quarter will top expectations but thatQ2 outlook will come in below estimates, with consensus paid member adds being a &#34;slightly high hurdle,&#34; based on prior reports.</p><p>Stifel analyst Scott Devittmaintained a“Buy” rating and a $460 price target on Netflix’s shares. Devitt noted the loss of subscribers in Russia and ongoing disruption in EMEA may limit the upside to subscriber growth. And looking past the first quarter, Devitt is tempering his estimates for 2022 and beyond as he takes a more conservative approach to the subscriber and ARPU growth on worsening macro conditions and continued uncertainty.</p><p>JPMorgan analyst Doug Anmuth issued an “Overweight” rating and a $605 price target on Netflix’s shares. Anmuth was continuing to believe Netflix has meaningful room for further global subscriber penetration. And Anmuth believed Netflix is currently 29% penetrated among the approximately 776 million global broadband subscribers, 33% penetrated among the approximately 675 million current global pay-TV subscribers, and 31% penetrated among the approximately 712 million maximum global pay-TV subscribers.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Netflix Q1 Earnings are Coming: 3 Most Important Things to Watch</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nNetflix Q1 Earnings are Coming: 3 Most Important Things to Watch\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-04-19 07:24</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX) is scheduled to announce Q1 earnings results after market closes on Tuesday, April 19.</p><p><b>Latest Results</b></p><p>In Q4 2021, Netflix added 8.28 million net new subscribers, a bit shy of the company&#39;s own forecast for 8.5 million net adds, and about in line with the Wall Street consensus forecast at 8.3 million. The company now has 221.8 million subscribers globally.</p><p>The company generated Q4 revenue of $7.7 billion, up 16%, and in line with the company&#39;s projection at $7.7 billion. Profits were $1.33 cents a share, well ahead of analysts at 83 cents, with the outperformance mostly due to an unrealized gain tied to the company&#39;s euro denominated debt.</p><p><b>Q1 Guidance</b></p><p>Netflix&#39;s projections for Q1 2022 were even lighter. The management&#39;s guidance is projecting 2.5 million net adds. While analysts on average predict 2.81 million in Q1, and 2.64 million in Q2, according to FactSet.</p><p>It sees Q1 revenue of $7.9 billion, up 10.3%, but well shy of the Street consensus at $8.2 billion.</p><p><b>3</b> <b>Most Important Things to Watch</b></p><p>1. Subscriber additions</p><p>As always, an important focus for investors will be Netflix&#39;s net paid subscriber additions. In Q3, Netflix saw a re-acceleration in its quarterly subscriber growth, as net additions came in at 8.3 million. Though this was notably below the 8.5 million net new subscribers the company had estimated it would add during the quarter, it was still good to see a significant sequential uptick from the 4.4 million members the company added in the prior quarter.</p><p>But what likely spooked investors was management&#39;s guidance for just 2.5 million net new paid subscribers inQ1 2022. This would be down significantly from the 4.0 million the company added inQ1 2021. This weak outlook, management explained, reflects the quarter&#39;s back-end weighted content slate.</p><p>2. Commentary on competition</p><p>Another red flag for Netflix investors in Q4 was management&#39;s nod to increasing competition. In a rare acknowledgment of competition having a negative impact on the company, management said, &#34;added competition may be affecting our marginal growth some...&#34;</p><p>Investors should look to see if management doubles down on this worrisome narrative or if it brings positive data points to the table regarding how it is faring in a competitive environment. Chances are, the worrisome remarks about competition will continue. But investors should note that the stock&#39;s big decline has arguably priced in expectations for heated competition going forward.</p><p>3. Subscriber-growth guidance</p><p>Of course, another key metric to watch will be the company&#39;s guidance for subscriber growth inQ2 2022. Technically, a back-weighted content slate in Q1 should positively impact Q2. Further, it&#39;s no secret that content production has been ramping back up from periods when much of the world was facing lockdowns. So lots of new content from Netflix should provide a catalyst for reaccelerated subscriber growth, assuming increasing competition isn&#39;t providing too much negative pressure.</p><p>While it&#39;s always tough to estimate how many subscribers Netflix will guide for, it would be nice to see guidance for second-quarter subscriber levels on par with pre-COVID levels again. To do this, the company would need to guide for around 2.7 million new subscribers in Q2.</p><p><b>Analyst Opinions</b></p><p>Truist analyst Matthew Thornton cut the price target of Netflix to $409 from $470.Thornton said in a research note that based on mobile app downloads, he believes the company&#39;s subscriber numbers in the first quarter will top expectations but thatQ2 outlook will come in below estimates, with consensus paid member adds being a &#34;slightly high hurdle,&#34; based on prior reports.</p><p>Stifel analyst Scott Devittmaintained a“Buy” rating and a $460 price target on Netflix’s shares. Devitt noted the loss of subscribers in Russia and ongoing disruption in EMEA may limit the upside to subscriber growth. And looking past the first quarter, Devitt is tempering his estimates for 2022 and beyond as he takes a more conservative approach to the subscriber and ARPU growth on worsening macro conditions and continued uncertainty.</p><p>JPMorgan analyst Doug Anmuth issued an “Overweight” rating and a $605 price target on Netflix’s shares. Anmuth was continuing to believe Netflix has meaningful room for further global subscriber penetration. And Anmuth believed Netflix is currently 29% penetrated among the approximately 776 million global broadband subscribers, 33% penetrated among the approximately 675 million current global pay-TV subscribers, and 31% penetrated among the approximately 712 million maximum global pay-TV subscribers.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NFLX":"奈飞"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1105840721","content_text":"Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX) is scheduled to announce Q1 earnings results after market closes on Tuesday, April 19.Latest ResultsIn Q4 2021, Netflix added 8.28 million net new subscribers, a bit shy of the company's own forecast for 8.5 million net adds, and about in line with the Wall Street consensus forecast at 8.3 million. The company now has 221.8 million subscribers globally.The company generated Q4 revenue of $7.7 billion, up 16%, and in line with the company's projection at $7.7 billion. Profits were $1.33 cents a share, well ahead of analysts at 83 cents, with the outperformance mostly due to an unrealized gain tied to the company's euro denominated debt.Q1 GuidanceNetflix's projections for Q1 2022 were even lighter. The management's guidance is projecting 2.5 million net adds. While analysts on average predict 2.81 million in Q1, and 2.64 million in Q2, according to FactSet.It sees Q1 revenue of $7.9 billion, up 10.3%, but well shy of the Street consensus at $8.2 billion.3 Most Important Things to Watch1. Subscriber additionsAs always, an important focus for investors will be Netflix's net paid subscriber additions. In Q3, Netflix saw a re-acceleration in its quarterly subscriber growth, as net additions came in at 8.3 million. Though this was notably below the 8.5 million net new subscribers the company had estimated it would add during the quarter, it was still good to see a significant sequential uptick from the 4.4 million members the company added in the prior quarter.But what likely spooked investors was management's guidance for just 2.5 million net new paid subscribers inQ1 2022. This would be down significantly from the 4.0 million the company added inQ1 2021. This weak outlook, management explained, reflects the quarter's back-end weighted content slate.2. Commentary on competitionAnother red flag for Netflix investors in Q4 was management's nod to increasing competition. In a rare acknowledgment of competition having a negative impact on the company, management said, \"added competition may be affecting our marginal growth some...\"Investors should look to see if management doubles down on this worrisome narrative or if it brings positive data points to the table regarding how it is faring in a competitive environment. Chances are, the worrisome remarks about competition will continue. But investors should note that the stock's big decline has arguably priced in expectations for heated competition going forward.3. Subscriber-growth guidanceOf course, another key metric to watch will be the company's guidance for subscriber growth inQ2 2022. Technically, a back-weighted content slate in Q1 should positively impact Q2. Further, it's no secret that content production has been ramping back up from periods when much of the world was facing lockdowns. So lots of new content from Netflix should provide a catalyst for reaccelerated subscriber growth, assuming increasing competition isn't providing too much negative pressure.While it's always tough to estimate how many subscribers Netflix will guide for, it would be nice to see guidance for second-quarter subscriber levels on par with pre-COVID levels again. To do this, the company would need to guide for around 2.7 million new subscribers in Q2.Analyst OpinionsTruist analyst Matthew Thornton cut the price target of Netflix to $409 from $470.Thornton said in a research note that based on mobile app downloads, he believes the company's subscriber numbers in the first quarter will top expectations but thatQ2 outlook will come in below estimates, with consensus paid member adds being a \"slightly high hurdle,\" based on prior reports.Stifel analyst Scott Devittmaintained a“Buy” rating and a $460 price target on Netflix’s shares. Devitt noted the loss of subscribers in Russia and ongoing disruption in EMEA may limit the upside to subscriber growth. And looking past the first quarter, Devitt is tempering his estimates for 2022 and beyond as he takes a more conservative approach to the subscriber and ARPU growth on worsening macro conditions and continued uncertainty.JPMorgan analyst Doug Anmuth issued an “Overweight” rating and a $605 price target on Netflix’s shares. Anmuth was continuing to believe Netflix has meaningful room for further global subscriber penetration. And Anmuth believed Netflix is currently 29% penetrated among the approximately 776 million global broadband subscribers, 33% penetrated among the approximately 675 million current global pay-TV subscribers, and 31% penetrated among the approximately 712 million maximum global pay-TV subscribers.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":152,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9081536939,"gmtCreate":1650251102743,"gmtModify":1676534679476,"author":{"id":"3562758894473836","authorId":"3562758894473836","name":"Kaelyn","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3562758894473836","authorIdStr":"3562758894473836"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[smile]&nbsp;","listText":"[smile]&nbsp;","text":"[smile]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9081536939","repostId":"2227600101","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2227600101","pubTimestamp":1650248539,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2227600101?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-04-18 10:22","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Vs. Microsoft: Why We Like Apple Better","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2227600101","media":"seekingalpha","summary":"SummaryThe competition between Apple and Microsoft has shaped the evolution of personal computing.Th","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>Summary</b></p><ul><li>The competition between Apple and Microsoft has shaped the evolution of personal computing.</li><li>Their competition will continue in many core areas, but both are good candidates to play the world’s unstoppable shift toward a digital future.</li><li>This article provides an in-depth comparison so you can see why we like Apple better ourselves.</li><li>Our investing roadmap shows Apple provides a higher return potential with its better profitability, better R&amp;D yields, lower valuation, and consumer-centric devices.</li><li>And having a coherent investing roadmap keeps us clear headed, especially during challenging times like this.</li></ul><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0f5fd4c711942def6b79ac0bfdd04167\" tg-width=\"750\" tg-height=\"479\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images News</span></p><p><b>The investment thesis</b></p><p>The thesis of this article is really simple – under the current conditions, both Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) and Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT) provide far superior returns for long-term investors than the overall market. The key argument is built on the following chart. This chart also is the roadmap that we use in our Marketplace service to pick our tactical holdings. Having a coherent investing roadmap keeps us clear-headed, especially during challenging times like this.</p><p>You will see from the following chart, AAPL is projected to provide about 13% annual return (“ROI”) in the long term and MSFT about 10%, while the overall market is only about 6.5%. The main reasons are threefold:</p><ul><li>Their far superior ROCE (return on capital employed) over the market average, which gives it the ability to grow without the need for too much capital and subsequently can return most of the earnings to shareholders (either as dividends or share buybacks).</li><li>Their fundamental business models provide a stable moat and enjoy strong secular support.</li><li>Yet both of them sell at a similar valuation compared to the overall market.</li></ul><p>Then we will detail the reasons why we only own AAPL even though both are good candidates to play the world’s unstoppable shift toward a digital future. As you will see, the primary reason is that we like a concentrated portfolio and usually limit our exposure to one sector to one holding. And we choose AAPL because of its better profitability and its consumer-centric business model. We feel consumer stickiness, once established, is longer lasting and harder to change.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6f9fbd0e002bec5dc3e06183618e8562\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"432\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Source: author</span></p><p><b>How did we build our roadmap and how did it perform?</b></p><p>The key in building this road is to think like a business owner, not a stock trader. As detailed in our earlier article:</p><blockquote><ul><li><i>The long-term ROI for a business owner is simply determined by two things: A) the price paid to buy the business and B) the quality of the business. More specifically, part A is determined by the owner’s earning yield (“OEY”) when we purchased the business. And that is why PE is the first dimension in our roadmap. Part B is determined by the quality of the business and that is why ROCE, the most important metric for profitability, is the second dimension in our roadmap.</i></li><li><i>Now, the long-term growth rate is governed by ROCE and the Reinvestment Rate. These are the two most important growth engines, and they mutually enhance each other. High ROCE means every $1 reinvested can lead to a higher growth rate, which leads to more future profits and more flexible capital allocation to fuel further growth, and so on. So to summarize:</i></li><li><i>Longer-Term ROI = valuation + quality = OEY + Growth Rate = OEY + ROCE*Reinvestment Rate</i></li></ul></blockquote><p>The performance of our stocks picked using this road is recently updated in this article. Using the date I first published our portfolio on 5/31/2021 as the inception date, our picks have outperformed the S&amp;P 500 by about 11%.</p><p>With this background, the remainder of this article will show how the above roadmap applies to AAPL and MSFT.</p><p><b>APPL vs MSFT: the competitive landscape</b></p><p>AAPL and MSFT compete head-on in many of their core areas, ranging from operation systems, digital ad, mobile devices, PCs and laptops, et al. Besides their own competitions, they also face competition from all sides. No big tech companies stay in their own corner these days. For example, MSFT’s Bing search is in direct competition with Google. GOOG’s Chrome OS and Android OS now have become popular desktop operating systems in the world, directly and meaningfully competing with MSFT Windows and also Apple IOS.</p><p>But overall, they dominate the intersection of technology and consumer access. As such, both are protected by a formidable moat and well positioned to benefit from our world’s continued shifts toward digitalization. And the good news is that the pie is getting bigger itself as our appetite grows exponentially for data, automation, and entertainment.</p><p>Although we like AAPL better ourselves, we really do not see a bad choice here. Investors just need to pick the one that suits their own risk profile and fits in their own circle of competence.</p><p>For us, we understand AAPL’s consumer-centric business model better than MSFT’s enterprise-centric model. AAPL has mastered the interplay of freemium pricing and premium pricing strategy with billions of consumers. It can set substantially higher prices for its products (ranging from iPhone, MacBook, iPad, et al) than Microsoft and Android devices. As you will see immediately below, it has created a profitability category of its own kind.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/520b7911627c79cc9d82b83c715f8170\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"390\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Source: https://startuptalky.com/apple-vs-microsoft-marketing-strategy/</span></p><p><b>MSFT: more consistent and aggressive R&amp;D</b></p><p>First, we do not invest in a given tech stock because we have high confidence in a certain product that they are developing in the pipeline. Instead, we feel more comfortable betting on A) the recurring resources available to fund new R&amp;D efforts sustainably, and B) the overall efficiency of the R&amp;D <i>process</i>. So correspondingly, in the long run, I feel comfortable as long as a tech business can A) sustainably support new R&amp;D expenditures, and B) has demonstrated a consistent R&amp;D yield. I do not feel the need to particularly bet on any one of the new products to be a hit (or a complete failure).</p><p>So let’s first see how well and sustainably MSFT and AAPL can fund their new R&amp;D efforts. The short answer is: Extremely well. The next chart shows the R&amp;D expenses of MSFT and AAPL over the past decade. As seen, both have been consistently investing heavily in R&amp;D. A few observations:</p><ul><li>MSFT has been spending very consistently on R&amp;D, on average about 13% of its total revenue.</li><li>AAPL’s story is a bit more colorful. It did not spend that much on R&amp;D earlier in the decade. Partly because AAPL products were so disruptive at that time and enjoyed a quasi-monopoly status. Partly because Steve Jobs himself did not believe in R&amp;D spending. He commented that “Innovation has nothing to do with how many R&amp;D dollars you have. It&#39;s not about money.”</li><li>Then Tim Cook transitioned it to a different model. He more than doubled the R&amp;D expenses since he took over. The R&amp;D expenses are on average about 6.1% of sales now, still lower than other tech giants in relative terms. But in absolute terms, it&#39;s a mind-boggling amount (exceeding $20 billion in 2021).</li></ul><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7152ffd849f9eba247a9dc86052864b4\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"353\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Author</span></p><p>Then the next question is, how effective is the R&amp;D process? The short answer is again: Extremely effective. We ourselves like to use a variation of Buffett’s $1 test on R&amp;D expenses. We do not only listen to CEOs’ pitches on their brilliant new ideas that will shake the earth (again). We also examine the financials to see their words are corroborated by the numbers. And in MSFT and AAPL’s case, they are.</p><p>The purpose of any corporate R&amp;D is obviously to generate profit. Therefore, it&#39;s intuitive to quantify the yield by taking the ratio between profit and R&amp;D expenditures. This way we can quantify how many dollars of profit has been generated per dollar of R&amp;D expenses (i.e., the $1 test), as shown in the next chart. In this chart, I used the operating cash flow as the measure of profit. Also, most R&amp;D investments do not produce any results in the same year. They typically have a lifetime of a few years. Therefore, this analysis assumes a three-year average investment cycle for R&amp;D. And as a result, we use the three-year moving average of operating cash flow to represent this three-year cycle.</p><p>A few key observations:</p><ul><li>The R&amp;D yield for MSFT is again very consistent, boasting a long-term average of $2.8 of yield per $1 of R&amp;D expenditure. The consistency again shows the stable moat.</li><li>AAPL, as usual, has a more colorful story. As you can see, its R&amp;D yield has been more than $10 in 2013 under the tutelage of Steve Jobs. And it has declined to a range between $4.0 and $5.0 in recent years with an average of $4.3.</li><li>You might interpret the decline of AAPL’s R&amp;D yield as bad news. However, keep in mind that A) the level of profitability AAPL enjoyed in the early part of the decade is simply unsustainable, B) the decline is only relative to its own glorious past.</li><li>Overall, both AAPL and MSFT enjoy R&amp;D yields that are very competitive. To put things under perspective, for the overachieving FAAMG group, their average R&amp;D yield is “only” about $2.5.</li></ul><p>Then as we will next, both MSFT and AAPL enjoy superb profitability to fuel their R&amp;D efforts sustainably, which will lead to sustainable growth in turn.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7759bd87d22eab2200f1865c5436dc14\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"345\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Author</span></p><p><b>Both enjoy superb profitability but AAPL in its own category</b></p><p>When we think of long-term growth (like in 10 years or more), the framework I use is the following. In the long term, the growth rate is “simply” the product of ROCE and reinvestment rate, i.e.,</p><p><b>Long-Term Growth Rate = ROCE * Reinvestment Rate</b></p><p>ROCE stands for the return on capital employed and is the most important metric for measuring profitability. Note that ROCE is different from the return on equity (and more fundamental and important in my view). ROCE considers the return of capital ACTUALLY employed and therefore provides insight into how much additional capital a business needs to invest in order to earn a given extra amount of income – a key to estimating the long-term growth rate.</p><p>The detailed background ROCE has been detailed in my early articles and I will just directly quote the results below. In this analysis, I consider the following items capital actually employed A) Working capital (including payables, receivables, inventory), B) Gross Property, Plant, and Equipment, and C) Research and development expenses are also capitalized.</p><p>Based on the above considerations, the ROCE of MSFT and AAPL over the past decade is shown below. As seen,</p><ul><li>MSFT again is able to maintain a remarkably high ROCE and consistent level of ROCE: On average about 67% in recent years.</li><li>AAPL’s ROCE again has “declined” from an unsustainable level of 200% to 300% in the early years of the decade to the current level of around 150% in recent years.</li><li>But the keyword here is again <i>relative</i>. Their current level of ROCE may be higher or lower relative to each other or their own past. But any ROCE above 60% is remarkable. To put things under perspective, the overachievers in the FAAMG pack have an average ROCE of around 50% in recent years.</li></ul><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/595c877bbeb53f45b4d80d0d41b7ba50\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"330\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Author</span></p><p>In terms of reinvestment rate, both companies enjoy enviable capital allocation flexibility. The capital allocation picture is really simple for both companies here: Both earn a load of cash organically from their operations but do not need to spend much.</p><p>Given their high ROCE, it obviously makes total sense to reinvest as much of their earnings back into the business to fuel further growth as possible. But the problem is that for businesses at this scale, there are just not that many opportunities to reinvest the earnings. As a result, both have been allocating a large part of the remaining earnings to buy back shares. According to the current financials available on Seeking Alpha, as of TTM 2022, MSFT has been spending about 33% of the OPC on average on share repurchases, and AAPL even higher, about 77%.</p><p>All told, my estimates are that MSFT has been maintaining a reinvestment rate between 7.5% to 10% in recent years, and AAPL about 5% to 7.5%. And we will see the implications of the investment rates next.</p><p><b>Back to the roadmap</b></p><p>For AAPL, at its current price levels, the OEY is about ~3.8%. The growth rate is about 7.5% assuming a 7.5% reinvestment and a ROCE of 100% to be a bit conservative, resulting in a double-digit ROI already! For MSFT, the OEY is about ~3.3%. The growth rate is about 6.7% assuming a 10% reinvestment and a ROCE of 67%, resulting in about 10% ROI.</p><p>This is a key insight that we&#39;ve learned from Buffett – when you think like a business owner, you do not need a 10% growth rate to achieve a 10% return. We feel much more comfortable with a few percent of reliable and sustainable growth rate in stocks that we understand well.</p><p>The road map below shows the ROI based on an assumption of a 10% reinvestment rate, which is the average rate for the large and mature businesses in the S&amp;P 500 index. Admittedly, both MSFT&#39;s and AAPL’s reinvestment rate (especially APPL) is not as high as 10% currently. So the total ROI would be a bit lower than what is shown in the roadmap below. However, note that both boast strong cash generation capability and fortress balance sheet, which provide the optionality to crank up reinvestment rates or to boost growth through acquisitions.</p><p>In contrast, the overall market is currently valued at about 26.5x PE, resulting in an OEY of about 3.8%. however, the overall market’s ROCE is on the order of 20% or so. And with a 10% reinvestment rate, the growth rate would be about 2%, leading to a long-term ROI of about 6% per year.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6f9fbd0e002bec5dc3e06183618e8562\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"432\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Source: author</span></p><p><b>Risks</b></p><p>First and foremost, I do not see any structural risk associated with AAPL or MSFT at this moment. Remotely, there might be an antitrust regulatory risk. But even if it comes to that, I&#39;m not entirely certain if it will be bad for AAPL or MSFT investors for sure. If it really comes to that and the company has to be broken up, the market would be forced to value each of its business segments separately. And such a complete and transparent valuation may or may not result in a lower valuation.</p><p>There can be significant short-term volatility risks too. Regardless of AAPL and MSFT scale and business model, the valuation is at a high level and the overall market itself is also near a historical record valuation. There are several large macroeconomic and geopolitical uncertainties unfolding right now, including the pandemic, Ukraine conflicts, global logistic chain interruptions, and Fed’s interest rate decisions. Such a combination of high valuation and high volatility certainly could cause short terms risks – but are irrelevant for the long term.</p><p><b>Conclusion and final thought</b></p><p>When we invest like a business owner, not a stock trader, our long-term ROI is simply the sum of two things: A) the price paid to buy the business and B) the quality of the business. In both MSFT and AAPL’s case, they provide a far superior return for long-term investors than the overall market because of their far superior ROCE over the market average. Such high ROCE gives it the ability to grow without the need for too much capital and subsequently can return most of the earnings to shareholders (either as dividends or share buybacks).</p><p>The key takeaways are:</p><ul><li>Both dominate the intersection of technology and consumer access and both are protected by a formidable moat. They both provide favorable odds for double-digit returns in the long term.</li><li>As such, we really do not see a bad choice here. Investors just need to pick the one that suits their own risk profile and fits in their own circle of competence.</li><li>We like AAPL better ourselves mostly because we understand its consumer-centric business model better. We understand the roots of its superb profitability and consumer stickiness. After all and above all, having a coherent investing roadmap and staying within one’s circle of competence is the key to investing.</li></ul></body></html>","source":"seekingalpha","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Vs. Microsoft: Why We Like Apple Better</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Vs. Microsoft: Why We Like Apple Better\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-04-18 10:22 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4501666-apple-vs-microsoft-why-we-like-apple-better><strong>seekingalpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>SummaryThe competition between Apple and Microsoft has shaped the evolution of personal computing.Their competition will continue in many core areas, but both are good candidates to play the world’s ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4501666-apple-vs-microsoft-why-we-like-apple-better\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BK4581":"高盛持仓","BK4504":"桥水持仓","BK4512":"苹果概念","BK4548":"巴美列捷福持仓","BK4170":"电脑硬件、储存设备及电脑周边","BK4528":"SaaS概念","BK4516":"特朗普概念","BK4515":"5G概念","BK4532":"文艺复兴科技持仓","BK4554":"元宇宙及AR概念","MSFT":"微软","BK4553":"喜马拉雅资本持仓","AAPL":"苹果","BK4571":"数字音乐概念","BK4567":"ESG概念","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","BK4507":"流媒体概念","BK4576":"AR","BK4533":"AQR资本管理(全球第二大对冲基金)","BK4575":"芯片概念","BK4566":"资本集团","BK4525":"远程办公概念","BK4535":"淡马锡持仓","BK4577":"网络游戏","BK4501":"段永平概念","BK4538":"云计算","BK4527":"明星科技股","BK4559":"巴菲特持仓","BK4579":"人工智能","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓","BK4097":"系统软件","BK4503":"景林资产持仓","BK4574":"无人驾驶","BK4573":"虚拟现实","BK4505":"高瓴资本持仓"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4501666-apple-vs-microsoft-why-we-like-apple-better","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5a36db9d73b4222bc376d24ccc48c8a4","article_id":"2227600101","content_text":"SummaryThe competition between Apple and Microsoft has shaped the evolution of personal computing.Their competition will continue in many core areas, but both are good candidates to play the world’s unstoppable shift toward a digital future.This article provides an in-depth comparison so you can see why we like Apple better ourselves.Our investing roadmap shows Apple provides a higher return potential with its better profitability, better R&D yields, lower valuation, and consumer-centric devices.And having a coherent investing roadmap keeps us clear headed, especially during challenging times like this.Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images NewsThe investment thesisThe thesis of this article is really simple – under the current conditions, both Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) and Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT) provide far superior returns for long-term investors than the overall market. The key argument is built on the following chart. This chart also is the roadmap that we use in our Marketplace service to pick our tactical holdings. Having a coherent investing roadmap keeps us clear-headed, especially during challenging times like this.You will see from the following chart, AAPL is projected to provide about 13% annual return (“ROI”) in the long term and MSFT about 10%, while the overall market is only about 6.5%. The main reasons are threefold:Their far superior ROCE (return on capital employed) over the market average, which gives it the ability to grow without the need for too much capital and subsequently can return most of the earnings to shareholders (either as dividends or share buybacks).Their fundamental business models provide a stable moat and enjoy strong secular support.Yet both of them sell at a similar valuation compared to the overall market.Then we will detail the reasons why we only own AAPL even though both are good candidates to play the world’s unstoppable shift toward a digital future. As you will see, the primary reason is that we like a concentrated portfolio and usually limit our exposure to one sector to one holding. And we choose AAPL because of its better profitability and its consumer-centric business model. We feel consumer stickiness, once established, is longer lasting and harder to change.Source: authorHow did we build our roadmap and how did it perform?The key in building this road is to think like a business owner, not a stock trader. As detailed in our earlier article:The long-term ROI for a business owner is simply determined by two things: A) the price paid to buy the business and B) the quality of the business. More specifically, part A is determined by the owner’s earning yield (“OEY”) when we purchased the business. And that is why PE is the first dimension in our roadmap. Part B is determined by the quality of the business and that is why ROCE, the most important metric for profitability, is the second dimension in our roadmap.Now, the long-term growth rate is governed by ROCE and the Reinvestment Rate. These are the two most important growth engines, and they mutually enhance each other. High ROCE means every $1 reinvested can lead to a higher growth rate, which leads to more future profits and more flexible capital allocation to fuel further growth, and so on. So to summarize:Longer-Term ROI = valuation + quality = OEY + Growth Rate = OEY + ROCE*Reinvestment RateThe performance of our stocks picked using this road is recently updated in this article. Using the date I first published our portfolio on 5/31/2021 as the inception date, our picks have outperformed the S&P 500 by about 11%.With this background, the remainder of this article will show how the above roadmap applies to AAPL and MSFT.APPL vs MSFT: the competitive landscapeAAPL and MSFT compete head-on in many of their core areas, ranging from operation systems, digital ad, mobile devices, PCs and laptops, et al. Besides their own competitions, they also face competition from all sides. No big tech companies stay in their own corner these days. For example, MSFT’s Bing search is in direct competition with Google. GOOG’s Chrome OS and Android OS now have become popular desktop operating systems in the world, directly and meaningfully competing with MSFT Windows and also Apple IOS.But overall, they dominate the intersection of technology and consumer access. As such, both are protected by a formidable moat and well positioned to benefit from our world’s continued shifts toward digitalization. And the good news is that the pie is getting bigger itself as our appetite grows exponentially for data, automation, and entertainment.Although we like AAPL better ourselves, we really do not see a bad choice here. Investors just need to pick the one that suits their own risk profile and fits in their own circle of competence.For us, we understand AAPL’s consumer-centric business model better than MSFT’s enterprise-centric model. AAPL has mastered the interplay of freemium pricing and premium pricing strategy with billions of consumers. It can set substantially higher prices for its products (ranging from iPhone, MacBook, iPad, et al) than Microsoft and Android devices. As you will see immediately below, it has created a profitability category of its own kind.Source: https://startuptalky.com/apple-vs-microsoft-marketing-strategy/MSFT: more consistent and aggressive R&DFirst, we do not invest in a given tech stock because we have high confidence in a certain product that they are developing in the pipeline. Instead, we feel more comfortable betting on A) the recurring resources available to fund new R&D efforts sustainably, and B) the overall efficiency of the R&D process. So correspondingly, in the long run, I feel comfortable as long as a tech business can A) sustainably support new R&D expenditures, and B) has demonstrated a consistent R&D yield. I do not feel the need to particularly bet on any one of the new products to be a hit (or a complete failure).So let’s first see how well and sustainably MSFT and AAPL can fund their new R&D efforts. The short answer is: Extremely well. The next chart shows the R&D expenses of MSFT and AAPL over the past decade. As seen, both have been consistently investing heavily in R&D. A few observations:MSFT has been spending very consistently on R&D, on average about 13% of its total revenue.AAPL’s story is a bit more colorful. It did not spend that much on R&D earlier in the decade. Partly because AAPL products were so disruptive at that time and enjoyed a quasi-monopoly status. Partly because Steve Jobs himself did not believe in R&D spending. He commented that “Innovation has nothing to do with how many R&D dollars you have. It's not about money.”Then Tim Cook transitioned it to a different model. He more than doubled the R&D expenses since he took over. The R&D expenses are on average about 6.1% of sales now, still lower than other tech giants in relative terms. But in absolute terms, it's a mind-boggling amount (exceeding $20 billion in 2021).AuthorThen the next question is, how effective is the R&D process? The short answer is again: Extremely effective. We ourselves like to use a variation of Buffett’s $1 test on R&D expenses. We do not only listen to CEOs’ pitches on their brilliant new ideas that will shake the earth (again). We also examine the financials to see their words are corroborated by the numbers. And in MSFT and AAPL’s case, they are.The purpose of any corporate R&D is obviously to generate profit. Therefore, it's intuitive to quantify the yield by taking the ratio between profit and R&D expenditures. This way we can quantify how many dollars of profit has been generated per dollar of R&D expenses (i.e., the $1 test), as shown in the next chart. In this chart, I used the operating cash flow as the measure of profit. Also, most R&D investments do not produce any results in the same year. They typically have a lifetime of a few years. Therefore, this analysis assumes a three-year average investment cycle for R&D. And as a result, we use the three-year moving average of operating cash flow to represent this three-year cycle.A few key observations:The R&D yield for MSFT is again very consistent, boasting a long-term average of $2.8 of yield per $1 of R&D expenditure. The consistency again shows the stable moat.AAPL, as usual, has a more colorful story. As you can see, its R&D yield has been more than $10 in 2013 under the tutelage of Steve Jobs. And it has declined to a range between $4.0 and $5.0 in recent years with an average of $4.3.You might interpret the decline of AAPL’s R&D yield as bad news. However, keep in mind that A) the level of profitability AAPL enjoyed in the early part of the decade is simply unsustainable, B) the decline is only relative to its own glorious past.Overall, both AAPL and MSFT enjoy R&D yields that are very competitive. To put things under perspective, for the overachieving FAAMG group, their average R&D yield is “only” about $2.5.Then as we will next, both MSFT and AAPL enjoy superb profitability to fuel their R&D efforts sustainably, which will lead to sustainable growth in turn.AuthorBoth enjoy superb profitability but AAPL in its own categoryWhen we think of long-term growth (like in 10 years or more), the framework I use is the following. In the long term, the growth rate is “simply” the product of ROCE and reinvestment rate, i.e.,Long-Term Growth Rate = ROCE * Reinvestment RateROCE stands for the return on capital employed and is the most important metric for measuring profitability. Note that ROCE is different from the return on equity (and more fundamental and important in my view). ROCE considers the return of capital ACTUALLY employed and therefore provides insight into how much additional capital a business needs to invest in order to earn a given extra amount of income – a key to estimating the long-term growth rate.The detailed background ROCE has been detailed in my early articles and I will just directly quote the results below. In this analysis, I consider the following items capital actually employed A) Working capital (including payables, receivables, inventory), B) Gross Property, Plant, and Equipment, and C) Research and development expenses are also capitalized.Based on the above considerations, the ROCE of MSFT and AAPL over the past decade is shown below. As seen,MSFT again is able to maintain a remarkably high ROCE and consistent level of ROCE: On average about 67% in recent years.AAPL’s ROCE again has “declined” from an unsustainable level of 200% to 300% in the early years of the decade to the current level of around 150% in recent years.But the keyword here is again relative. Their current level of ROCE may be higher or lower relative to each other or their own past. But any ROCE above 60% is remarkable. To put things under perspective, the overachievers in the FAAMG pack have an average ROCE of around 50% in recent years.AuthorIn terms of reinvestment rate, both companies enjoy enviable capital allocation flexibility. The capital allocation picture is really simple for both companies here: Both earn a load of cash organically from their operations but do not need to spend much.Given their high ROCE, it obviously makes total sense to reinvest as much of their earnings back into the business to fuel further growth as possible. But the problem is that for businesses at this scale, there are just not that many opportunities to reinvest the earnings. As a result, both have been allocating a large part of the remaining earnings to buy back shares. According to the current financials available on Seeking Alpha, as of TTM 2022, MSFT has been spending about 33% of the OPC on average on share repurchases, and AAPL even higher, about 77%.All told, my estimates are that MSFT has been maintaining a reinvestment rate between 7.5% to 10% in recent years, and AAPL about 5% to 7.5%. And we will see the implications of the investment rates next.Back to the roadmapFor AAPL, at its current price levels, the OEY is about ~3.8%. The growth rate is about 7.5% assuming a 7.5% reinvestment and a ROCE of 100% to be a bit conservative, resulting in a double-digit ROI already! For MSFT, the OEY is about ~3.3%. The growth rate is about 6.7% assuming a 10% reinvestment and a ROCE of 67%, resulting in about 10% ROI.This is a key insight that we've learned from Buffett – when you think like a business owner, you do not need a 10% growth rate to achieve a 10% return. We feel much more comfortable with a few percent of reliable and sustainable growth rate in stocks that we understand well.The road map below shows the ROI based on an assumption of a 10% reinvestment rate, which is the average rate for the large and mature businesses in the S&P 500 index. Admittedly, both MSFT's and AAPL’s reinvestment rate (especially APPL) is not as high as 10% currently. So the total ROI would be a bit lower than what is shown in the roadmap below. However, note that both boast strong cash generation capability and fortress balance sheet, which provide the optionality to crank up reinvestment rates or to boost growth through acquisitions.In contrast, the overall market is currently valued at about 26.5x PE, resulting in an OEY of about 3.8%. however, the overall market’s ROCE is on the order of 20% or so. And with a 10% reinvestment rate, the growth rate would be about 2%, leading to a long-term ROI of about 6% per year.Source: authorRisksFirst and foremost, I do not see any structural risk associated with AAPL or MSFT at this moment. Remotely, there might be an antitrust regulatory risk. But even if it comes to that, I'm not entirely certain if it will be bad for AAPL or MSFT investors for sure. If it really comes to that and the company has to be broken up, the market would be forced to value each of its business segments separately. And such a complete and transparent valuation may or may not result in a lower valuation.There can be significant short-term volatility risks too. Regardless of AAPL and MSFT scale and business model, the valuation is at a high level and the overall market itself is also near a historical record valuation. There are several large macroeconomic and geopolitical uncertainties unfolding right now, including the pandemic, Ukraine conflicts, global logistic chain interruptions, and Fed’s interest rate decisions. Such a combination of high valuation and high volatility certainly could cause short terms risks – but are irrelevant for the long term.Conclusion and final thoughtWhen we invest like a business owner, not a stock trader, our long-term ROI is simply the sum of two things: A) the price paid to buy the business and B) the quality of the business. In both MSFT and AAPL’s case, they provide a far superior return for long-term investors than the overall market because of their far superior ROCE over the market average. Such high ROCE gives it the ability to grow without the need for too much capital and subsequently can return most of the earnings to shareholders (either as dividends or share buybacks).The key takeaways are:Both dominate the intersection of technology and consumer access and both are protected by a formidable moat. They both provide favorable odds for double-digit returns in the long term.As such, we really do not see a bad choice here. Investors just need to pick the one that suits their own risk profile and fits in their own circle of competence.We like AAPL better ourselves mostly because we understand its consumer-centric business model better. We understand the roots of its superb profitability and consumer stickiness. After all and above all, having a coherent investing roadmap and staying within one’s circle of competence is the key to investing.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":217,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":9052378453,"gmtCreate":1655131681372,"gmtModify":1676535567342,"author":{"id":"3562758894473836","authorId":"3562758894473836","name":"Kaelyn","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3562758894473836","authorIdStr":"3562758894473836"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[smile]&nbsp;","listText":"[smile]&nbsp;","text":"[smile]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9052378453","repostId":"2243965764","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":308,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9089717116,"gmtCreate":1650033745963,"gmtModify":1676534633180,"author":{"id":"3562758894473836","authorId":"3562758894473836","name":"Kaelyn","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3562758894473836","authorIdStr":"3562758894473836"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[smile]&nbsp;","listText":"[smile]&nbsp;","text":"[smile]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9089717116","repostId":"1142029213","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1142029213","pubTimestamp":1650032497,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1142029213?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-04-15 22:21","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Stock: Is It Cheap? Here's a Valuation Analysis.","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1142029213","media":"TheStreet","summary":"Apple stock has dipped once again, but is it cheap at its current price? The Apple Maven uses valuat","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Apple stock has dipped once again, but is it cheap at its current price? The Apple Maven uses valuation analysis to reach a conclusion.</p><p>Apple stock price continues to bounce around. As soon as the $3 trillion market cap got within reach, AAPL U-turned and dipped below $170 per share again.</p><p>Does this mean that Apple is a good stock to own on weakness? There are certainly a few different ways to approach this question. Today, I will do so from the perspective of valuations: think price-to-earnings and EV-to-EBITDA, for example.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8fd387e2ff36c054975b6635b30bb509\" tg-width=\"1240\" tg-height=\"827\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Figure 1: Is Apple Stock Cheap Today? A Valuation Analysis</span></p><p><b>Apple’s valuations vs. peer group</b></p><p>Perhaps the most commonly used valuation multiple is the price-to-earnings ratio, or P/E. It measures the price that investors pay for a stock relative to the company’s earnings per share — either historical (known as trailing P/E) or projected (forward P/E).</p><p>According to Stock Rover, Apple stock currently trades at a forward P/E of 25.6 times. This is a rich valuation multiple that sits closer to the higher end of Apple’s historical P/E range, although not at the very peak.</p><p>But should 25.6x be considered a high number in today’s market environment? Let’s compare the figure to the forward P/E of Apple’s key competitors and tech giant peers. See chart below.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1072f5b0f3b9b28542ca67c6a3a6fc2d\" tg-width=\"816\" tg-height=\"487\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Figure 2: Apple&#39;s forward P/E vs. peer group.</span></p><p>Notice that, compared to the likes of Amazon, Microsoft and Nvidia, Apple stock looks cheap. But compared to the internet giants Alphabet and Meta Platforms, Apple is richly valued. The average P/E for the group ex-Apple is 28.6x.</p><p>Of course, merely looking at P/E does not paint a full picture. For example, why might the earnings ratio be inflated or discounted?</p><p>One of the reasons could be growth expectations. The more robust a company’s long-term earnings growth potential is, the richer its P/E tends or deserves to be.</p><p>So, in order to do a better “apples-to-apples” comparison (pun definitely intended) between the Cupertino company and its peer, I suggest the following approach to normalize for growth expectations: divide each stock’s P/E by the estimate for five-year earnings increase.</p><p>The resulting metric is what we call the PEG ratio, which stands for P/E-to-growth. Below is a chart that shows PEG for each mega cap tech stock.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/37f0a7613c17d056e6545e83f56543e8\" tg-width=\"818\" tg-height=\"488\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Figure 3: Apple&#39;s forward PEG vs. peer group.</span></p><p>Here is the bad news for those who have just bought Apple stock: on a PEG basis, AAPL shares are the most expensive of the bunch. The 2.5x ratio is quite a bit above MSFT’s 1.9x, the second richest; and three times higher than FB’s 0.8x.</p><p>Clearly, Apple stock is expensive relative to its earnings and growth potential. But there are other reasons why a stock may be richly valued. Think of balance sheet solidity, for example, which is not reflected in earnings or earnings growth.</p><p>A good metric to use here is enterprise value-to-earnings before interest, taxes and depreciation — or EV/EBITDA. The numerator in this equation adjusts for net cash on hand, and rewards companies that have better liquidity.</p><p>Using this valuation metric (see chart below), notice how NVIDIA sticks out as an absurdly pricey stock. Apple is on par with Amazon and Microsoft, and more expensive (once again) then Alphabet and Meta.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e3c246cc206f51fe6101f999ef8fc890\" tg-width=\"817\" tg-height=\"481\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Figure 4: Apple&#39;s EV/EBITDA vs. peer group.</span></p><p><b>The verdict: is AAPL cheap?</b></p><p>Based on the traditional valuation metrics discussed above, it is hard to argue that AAPL is a cheap stock. At most, one could say that shares are worth their price, but they are probably not quite a bargain — even after the most recent stock price pullback.</p><p>But one must consider that calculating a stock’s worth through quantitative methods alone is not always easy. For example, investors may perceive Apple to be a safer stock to own — maybe due to the brand appeal, maybe because it could be a good inflation play.</p><p>After taking the more qualitative factors into account, an investor might feel quite comfortable owning Apple stock at its current share price of nearly $170.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Stock: Is It Cheap? Here's a Valuation Analysis.</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Stock: Is It Cheap? Here's a Valuation Analysis.\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-04-15 22:21 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.thestreet.com/apple/stock/is-apple-stock-cheap-today-a-valuation-analysis><strong>TheStreet</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Apple stock has dipped once again, but is it cheap at its current price? The Apple Maven uses valuation analysis to reach a conclusion.Apple stock price continues to bounce around. As soon as the $3 ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.thestreet.com/apple/stock/is-apple-stock-cheap-today-a-valuation-analysis\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://www.thestreet.com/apple/stock/is-apple-stock-cheap-today-a-valuation-analysis","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1142029213","content_text":"Apple stock has dipped once again, but is it cheap at its current price? The Apple Maven uses valuation analysis to reach a conclusion.Apple stock price continues to bounce around. As soon as the $3 trillion market cap got within reach, AAPL U-turned and dipped below $170 per share again.Does this mean that Apple is a good stock to own on weakness? There are certainly a few different ways to approach this question. Today, I will do so from the perspective of valuations: think price-to-earnings and EV-to-EBITDA, for example.Figure 1: Is Apple Stock Cheap Today? A Valuation AnalysisApple’s valuations vs. peer groupPerhaps the most commonly used valuation multiple is the price-to-earnings ratio, or P/E. It measures the price that investors pay for a stock relative to the company’s earnings per share — either historical (known as trailing P/E) or projected (forward P/E).According to Stock Rover, Apple stock currently trades at a forward P/E of 25.6 times. This is a rich valuation multiple that sits closer to the higher end of Apple’s historical P/E range, although not at the very peak.But should 25.6x be considered a high number in today’s market environment? Let’s compare the figure to the forward P/E of Apple’s key competitors and tech giant peers. See chart below.Figure 2: Apple's forward P/E vs. peer group.Notice that, compared to the likes of Amazon, Microsoft and Nvidia, Apple stock looks cheap. But compared to the internet giants Alphabet and Meta Platforms, Apple is richly valued. The average P/E for the group ex-Apple is 28.6x.Of course, merely looking at P/E does not paint a full picture. For example, why might the earnings ratio be inflated or discounted?One of the reasons could be growth expectations. The more robust a company’s long-term earnings growth potential is, the richer its P/E tends or deserves to be.So, in order to do a better “apples-to-apples” comparison (pun definitely intended) between the Cupertino company and its peer, I suggest the following approach to normalize for growth expectations: divide each stock’s P/E by the estimate for five-year earnings increase.The resulting metric is what we call the PEG ratio, which stands for P/E-to-growth. Below is a chart that shows PEG for each mega cap tech stock.Figure 3: Apple's forward PEG vs. peer group.Here is the bad news for those who have just bought Apple stock: on a PEG basis, AAPL shares are the most expensive of the bunch. The 2.5x ratio is quite a bit above MSFT’s 1.9x, the second richest; and three times higher than FB’s 0.8x.Clearly, Apple stock is expensive relative to its earnings and growth potential. But there are other reasons why a stock may be richly valued. Think of balance sheet solidity, for example, which is not reflected in earnings or earnings growth.A good metric to use here is enterprise value-to-earnings before interest, taxes and depreciation — or EV/EBITDA. The numerator in this equation adjusts for net cash on hand, and rewards companies that have better liquidity.Using this valuation metric (see chart below), notice how NVIDIA sticks out as an absurdly pricey stock. Apple is on par with Amazon and Microsoft, and more expensive (once again) then Alphabet and Meta.Figure 4: Apple's EV/EBITDA vs. peer group.The verdict: is AAPL cheap?Based on the traditional valuation metrics discussed above, it is hard to argue that AAPL is a cheap stock. At most, one could say that shares are worth their price, but they are probably not quite a bargain — even after the most recent stock price pullback.But one must consider that calculating a stock’s worth through quantitative methods alone is not always easy. For example, investors may perceive Apple to be a safer stock to own — maybe due to the brand appeal, maybe because it could be a good inflation play.After taking the more qualitative factors into account, an investor might feel quite comfortable owning Apple stock at its current share price of nearly $170.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":71,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9058088088,"gmtCreate":1654753193144,"gmtModify":1676535505280,"author":{"id":"3562758894473836","authorId":"3562758894473836","name":"Kaelyn","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3562758894473836","authorIdStr":"3562758894473836"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[smile]&nbsp;","listText":"[smile]&nbsp;","text":"[smile]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9058088088","repostId":"1188644119","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":382,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9027547998,"gmtCreate":1654057212114,"gmtModify":1676535387118,"author":{"id":"3562758894473836","authorId":"3562758894473836","name":"Kaelyn","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3562758894473836","authorIdStr":"3562758894473836"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[smile]&nbsp;","listText":"[smile]&nbsp;","text":"[smile]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9027547998","repostId":"2239912192","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2239912192","pubTimestamp":1654055198,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2239912192?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-06-01 11:46","market":"us","language":"en","title":"3 Stocks Wall Street Thinks Could Triple Your Money or Better","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2239912192","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Find out why the pros think these stocks could gain 200% or better.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>This has been a rough year to be a growth stock investor. The <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/EEME\">iShares</a> S&amp;P 500 Growth</b> index has been beaten down by around 22% and many of its components have lost more than half their value in 2022.</p><p>When most people see trouble they tend to run first and ask questions later. On Wall Street, though, cool-headed analysts are still enthusiastic about some of the stocks they&#39;ve been assigned to watch.</p><p>Shares of <b>Lovesac</b>, <b>Invitae</b>, and <b>Amyris</b> have lost a lot of ground, but analysts up and down Wall Street expect them to recover in big ways. The average target on these stocks is more than triple their recent prices.</p><h2>Lovesac</h2><p>Lovesac shares have lost 49% of their value this year even though the underlying business is succeeding in measurable ways. This is why the investment bank analysts who follow the company pinned a consensus price target on the stock that suggests a 230% gain over the next 12 months.</p><p>This company may be named after the giant beanbag chairs it sells, but most of its revenue these days comes from sales of modular sectional sofas called Sactionals. Seats, sides, and backs are interchangeable so a customer&#39;s first loveseat can expand to accommodate growing needs. With hundreds of replaceable upholstery options, families can even change their appearance to match a new home or remodel.</p><p>Demand for premium seating hit a fever pitch amid the most stringent COVID-related lockdowns. Fear of declining sales now that Americans are spending less time at home has been pushing the stock down, even though sales growth is still incredibly strong. During Lovesac&#39;s fiscal fourth quarter ended Jan. 30, 2022, sales jumped 51% year over year to $196 million.</p><p>Furniture&#39;s generally a low-margin business, but not the way Lovesac does it. A Sactional large enough to be called a sofa costs a few thousand dollars, so a lot of that revenue reaches the bottom line. Net income during fiscal 2022 more than tripled year over year to reach $45.9 million. As Lovesac&#39;s customers keep coming back to upgrade their Sactionals and replace worn-out upholstery, investors can look forward to steady earnings growth for many years to come.</p><h2>Invitae</h2><p>Shares of Invitae are down a stunning 74% this year, but Wall Street analysts think it can rebound. The consensus price target for this diagnostics industry stock represents a 283% premium over its price now.</p><p>Invitae is a highly innovative diagnostics provider that wants to bring comprehensive genetic information into mainstream medical practice. Business boomed last year, driving total revenue 65% higher to $460.4 million. In 2022, growth has decelerated with total first-quarter revenue that rose 19.4% year over year to $123.7 million.</p><p>Despite a slightly dampened first quarter, management told investors to expect around $640 million in top-line revenue this year. This would be 40% more than the company reported in 2021.</p><p>The science of medical genetics is advancing rapidly, but access to personal genetic information is still in its infancy. As Invitae&#39;s database grows, the insights its tests provide become more valuable. After billing over a million tests last year, this company&#39;s competitive edge has grown significantly.</p><h2>Amyris</h2><p>Shares of this synthetic biology business are down by about 55% this year, but Wall Street expects a major recovery. The average price target on this stock suggests a 340% gain could be up ahead.</p><p>Amyris engineers develop microorganisms that consume renewable feedstocks like sugarcane and excrete high-value ingredients such as squalane. High-end moisturizers use squalane derived from the livers of millions of sharks that would like to keep their internal organs where they belong. By fermenting squalane in stainless steel tanks, Amyris can produce buckets of the stuff with minimal environmental impact.</p><p>Amyris&#39; synthetic biology peers intend to make money by engineering new microorganisms and selling their excretions to third parties. These days, most of Amyris&#39; revenue comes from sales of its own increasingly popular beauty and wellness brands. Led by Biossance and JVN Hair, first-quarter consumer sales rose 121% year over year to $34.6 million.</p><p>This stock has been under a lot of pressure because it&#39;s currently losing money. Amyris finished March with $288 million in cash after burning through $110 million in the first quarter. However, investors can look forward to improving cash flows in the second half of the year. The company&#39;s new, wholly owned manufacturing facility just began production in April. This doesn&#39;t guarantee big profits ahead, but it sure gives the company a pretty good chance to start reporting positive cash flows soon.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>3 Stocks Wall Street Thinks Could Triple Your Money or Better</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n3 Stocks Wall Street Thinks Could Triple Your Money or Better\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-06-01 11:46 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/05/31/3-stocks-wall-street-thinks-could-triple-your-mone/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>This has been a rough year to be a growth stock investor. The iShares S&P 500 Growth index has been beaten down by around 22% and many of its components have lost more than half their value in 2022....</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/05/31/3-stocks-wall-street-thinks-could-triple-your-mone/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AMRS":"阿米瑞斯","NVTA":"Invitae Corporation","LOVE":"Lovesac Co."},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/05/31/3-stocks-wall-street-thinks-could-triple-your-mone/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2239912192","content_text":"This has been a rough year to be a growth stock investor. The iShares S&P 500 Growth index has been beaten down by around 22% and many of its components have lost more than half their value in 2022.When most people see trouble they tend to run first and ask questions later. On Wall Street, though, cool-headed analysts are still enthusiastic about some of the stocks they've been assigned to watch.Shares of Lovesac, Invitae, and Amyris have lost a lot of ground, but analysts up and down Wall Street expect them to recover in big ways. The average target on these stocks is more than triple their recent prices.LovesacLovesac shares have lost 49% of their value this year even though the underlying business is succeeding in measurable ways. This is why the investment bank analysts who follow the company pinned a consensus price target on the stock that suggests a 230% gain over the next 12 months.This company may be named after the giant beanbag chairs it sells, but most of its revenue these days comes from sales of modular sectional sofas called Sactionals. Seats, sides, and backs are interchangeable so a customer's first loveseat can expand to accommodate growing needs. With hundreds of replaceable upholstery options, families can even change their appearance to match a new home or remodel.Demand for premium seating hit a fever pitch amid the most stringent COVID-related lockdowns. Fear of declining sales now that Americans are spending less time at home has been pushing the stock down, even though sales growth is still incredibly strong. During Lovesac's fiscal fourth quarter ended Jan. 30, 2022, sales jumped 51% year over year to $196 million.Furniture's generally a low-margin business, but not the way Lovesac does it. A Sactional large enough to be called a sofa costs a few thousand dollars, so a lot of that revenue reaches the bottom line. Net income during fiscal 2022 more than tripled year over year to reach $45.9 million. As Lovesac's customers keep coming back to upgrade their Sactionals and replace worn-out upholstery, investors can look forward to steady earnings growth for many years to come.InvitaeShares of Invitae are down a stunning 74% this year, but Wall Street analysts think it can rebound. The consensus price target for this diagnostics industry stock represents a 283% premium over its price now.Invitae is a highly innovative diagnostics provider that wants to bring comprehensive genetic information into mainstream medical practice. Business boomed last year, driving total revenue 65% higher to $460.4 million. In 2022, growth has decelerated with total first-quarter revenue that rose 19.4% year over year to $123.7 million.Despite a slightly dampened first quarter, management told investors to expect around $640 million in top-line revenue this year. This would be 40% more than the company reported in 2021.The science of medical genetics is advancing rapidly, but access to personal genetic information is still in its infancy. As Invitae's database grows, the insights its tests provide become more valuable. After billing over a million tests last year, this company's competitive edge has grown significantly.AmyrisShares of this synthetic biology business are down by about 55% this year, but Wall Street expects a major recovery. The average price target on this stock suggests a 340% gain could be up ahead.Amyris engineers develop microorganisms that consume renewable feedstocks like sugarcane and excrete high-value ingredients such as squalane. High-end moisturizers use squalane derived from the livers of millions of sharks that would like to keep their internal organs where they belong. By fermenting squalane in stainless steel tanks, Amyris can produce buckets of the stuff with minimal environmental impact.Amyris' synthetic biology peers intend to make money by engineering new microorganisms and selling their excretions to third parties. These days, most of Amyris' revenue comes from sales of its own increasingly popular beauty and wellness brands. Led by Biossance and JVN Hair, first-quarter consumer sales rose 121% year over year to $34.6 million.This stock has been under a lot of pressure because it's currently losing money. Amyris finished March with $288 million in cash after burning through $110 million in the first quarter. However, investors can look forward to improving cash flows in the second half of the year. The company's new, wholly owned manufacturing facility just began production in April. This doesn't guarantee big profits ahead, but it sure gives the company a pretty good chance to start reporting positive cash flows soon.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":264,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9065763932,"gmtCreate":1652235198926,"gmtModify":1676535059218,"author":{"id":"3562758894473836","authorId":"3562758894473836","name":"Kaelyn","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3562758894473836","authorIdStr":"3562758894473836"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[smile]&nbsp;","listText":"[smile]&nbsp;","text":"[smile]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9065763932","repostId":"2234064478","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":166,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9081531639,"gmtCreate":1650250977576,"gmtModify":1676534679436,"author":{"id":"3562758894473836","authorId":"3562758894473836","name":"Kaelyn","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3562758894473836","authorIdStr":"3562758894473836"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[smile]&nbsp;","listText":"[smile]&nbsp;","text":"[smile]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9081531639","repostId":"2228379987","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2228379987","pubTimestamp":1650237595,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2228379987?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-04-18 07:19","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Netflix, Tesla Earnings: What to Know in Markets This Week","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2228379987","media":"Yahoo Finance","summary":"This week, earnings season is set to ramp up, offering investors a fresh set of data on the strength of corporate profits in the face of elevated inflationary pressure.Two of the major names reporting","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>This week, earnings season is set to ramp up, offering investors a fresh set of data on the strength of corporate profits in the face of elevated inflationary pressure.</p><p>Two of the major names reporting this week will include Netflix (NFLX) and Tesla (TSLA), offering an early look at how some of the mega-cap technology companies performed in the early part of the year.</p><p>The other names set to report this week will span a range of industries, broadening out from last week&#39;s bank-dominated results. Companies including United Airlines (UAL), American Express (AXP), Johnson &amp; Johnson (JNJ) and Kimberly-Clark (KMB) are each on deck to report in the coming days.</p><p>For earnings season so far, results have been mixed, albeit heavily skewed toward the slew of financial names that reported last week including JPMorgan Chase (JPM) and Goldman Sachs (GS). About 7% of S&amp;P 500 index components have reported actual Q1 results so far, and 77% of these have topped Wall Street&#39;s earnings per share (EPS) estimates, matching the five-year average percentage, according to data from FactSet. The estimated earnings growth rate for the index currently stands at 5.1%, which if carried through the rest of the season would mark the lowest earnings growth rate for the index since the fourth quarter of 2020.</p><h2><b>Netflix earnings</b></h2><p>Netflix is set to report results on Tuesday, with investors closely watching for further signs of a slowdown in the streaming giant&#39;s growth after a pandemic-era surge in subscriber numbers.</p><p>Analysts&#39; consensus estimates are looking for Netflix to have added about 2.51 million subscribers for the first quarter, which would mark the least since the second quarter of 2021. This would bring Netflix&#39;s total subscribers to just under 225 million. In the same quarter last year, subscribers grew by nearly 4 million.</p><p>Though Netflix has already seen subscriber growth slow sharply from a pandemic-era peak, the streaming giant&#39;s exit from Russia in early March is also set to further contribute to the deceleration. The Los Gatos, Calif.-based company suspended operations in Russia on March 6 over the country&#39;s invasion of Ukraine, and since then, analysts further trimmed their subscriber estimates.</p><p>&#34;We now expect paid net adds of 1.45MM, below guide of 2.5MM given Russia suspension (~1MM subs),&#34; Cowen analyst John Blackledge wrote in a note last week. The firm also lowered its price target on Netflix to $590 a share from $600 previously, on account of the lower subscriber growth forecast.</p><p>Other analysts also suggested that Netflix&#39;s churn, or subscriber losses, could increase in the quarter after the company announced a price increase for subscribers in the U.S. and Canada in January. But revenue pulled from these price increases could also be used to help Netflix build out bigger content slates and drive growth in less saturated markets internationally, others pointed out.</p><p>&#34;Netflix appears to be nearing a ceiling on UCAN (U.S. and Canada) subscribers, and is pulling new levers to lower churn,&#34; Wedbush analyst Michael Pachter wrote in a note. &#34;Subscription price increases in the West should fuel additional content production and growth in other regions, and our bias is that cash flow will turn positive in 2022 and beyond, as management has guided. However, subscriber growth will likely occur primarily in less developed regions at lower subscription prices, with Western subscribers paying higher rates to fund new content.&#34;</p><p>&#34;Content dumps, where all episodes of a new season are delivered at the same instant, will likely keep churn high, as price conscious consumers can swap out of Netflix and shift to a competitor service after viewing the content they desire,&#34; he added. &#34;Sustainable profit growth should continue so long as Netflix is able to continue raising subscription prices, but competition may limit future price increases.&#34;</p><p>Overall, Netflix is expected to report GAAP earnings of $2.91 per share on revenue of $7.95 billion, which on the top line would represent just a 11% increase over last year. In the same quarter in 2021, revenue grew 24%.</p><p>Shares of Netflix have fallen 43% for the year-to-date in 2022, underperforming against the S&amp;P 500&#39;s 7.8% drop over that same period.</p><h2>Tesla earnings</h2><p>Meanwhile, another major company set to report results this week will be Tesla.</p><p>The electric vehicle maker is scheduled to post its quarterly report Wednesday after market close. Ahead of these results, Tesla announced record deliveries of more than 310,000 during the first three months of this year. That represented a 68% jump over last year&#39;s deliveries. Tesla has sought to average 50% growth in annual vehicle deliveries.</p><p>Production, however, slipped slightly on a quarter-over-quarter basis, with output coming in at 305,407 for the first quarter compared to 305,840 during the final three months of 2021. Tesla, like many other automakers, has continued to grapple with lingering supply chain challenges and rising input costs, leading CEO Elon Musk to suggest that the company may begin mining its own lithium for batteries as metal prices soar.</p><p>&#34;Right now Tesla has a high-class problem of demand outstripping supply with this issue now translating into ~5-6 month delays for Model Ys, some Model 3s in different parts of the globe,&#34; Wedbush analyst Dan Ives wrote in a note. &#34;The key to alleviating these issues is centered around the key Giga openings in Austin and Berlin which will alleviate the bottlenecks of production for Tesla globally.&#34;</p><p>Just earlier this month, Tesla officially began delivering its first Texas-made vehicles from its new Austin Gigafactory. At Tesla&#39;s &#34;Cyber Rodeo&#34; launch party on April 7, Musk said the facility was aiming to begin building the Tesla Cybertruck starting in 2023 and has targeted making 500,000 units of the Model Y per year.</p><p>The newly made U.S. Gigafactory is set to be pivotal in helping Tesla further ramp production and help meet demand domestically, especially given snarls internationally as Tesla&#39;s Shanghai Gigafactory closed for weeks due to a COVID outbreak in the region.</p><p><i>&#34;</i>We believe by the end of 2022 Tesla will have the run rate capacity for overall ~2 million units annually from roughly 1 million today,&#34; Ives added. &#34;While the China zero COVID policy is causing shutdowns in Shanghai for Tesla (and others) and remains a worrying trend if it continues, seeing the forest through the trees with Austin and Berlin now live and ramping, Musk &amp; Co. will continue to flex its distribution muscles in the EV landscape while many other automakers struggle to get things off the ground.&#34;</p><p>While Tesla shares have outperformed the S&amp;P 500 for the year-to-date, the stock came under pressure on Thursday after Musk disclosed he made an offer to buy social media company <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TWTR\">Twitter</a> (TWTR) for $54.20 per share, or about $43 billion in cash. Many have noted Musk would likely have to sell Tesla shares in order to finance the deal if it were to go through.</p><p>In Tesla&#39;s first-quarter results, Wall Street is looking for the company to post adjusted earnings of $2.27 per share on revenue of $17.85 billion, representing sales growth of 65%.</p><h2>Economic calendar</h2><ul><li><p><b>Monday: </b>NAHB Housing Market Index, April (77 expected, 79 in March)</p></li><li><p><b>Tuesday: </b>Housing starts, March (1.745 million expected, 1.769 million in February); Building permits, March (1.830 million expected, 1.859 million in February)</p></li><li><p><b>Wednesday: </b>MBA Mortgage Applications, week ended April 15 (-1.3% during prior week); Existing home sales, March (5.78 million expected, 6.02 million in February); Federal Reserve releases Beige Book</p></li><li><p><b>Thursday: </b>Philadelphia Fed Business Outlook index, April (20.5 expected, 27.4 in March); Initial jobless claims, week ended April 16 (185,000 during prior week); Continuing claims, week ended April 9 (1.475 million during prior week); Leading Index, March (0.3% expected, 0.3% in February)</p></li><li><p><b>Friday: </b>S&amp;P Global U.S. Manufacturing PMI, April preliminary (57.8 expected, 58.8 in March); S&amp;P Global U.S. Services PMI, April preliminary (58.1 expected, 58.0 in March); S&amp;P Global U.S. Composite PMI, April preliminary (57.7 in March)</p></li></ul><h2>Earnings calendar</h2><h2><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c5fcaf90030c6d8be015e91c8c372d74\" tg-width=\"1800\" tg-height=\"1430\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></h2><p><b>Monday</b></p><p>Before market open: <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SYF\">Synchrony Financial</a> (SYF), Bank of New York Mellon Corp. (BK), Bank of America (BAC), Charles Schwab (SCHW)</p><p>After market close: JB Hunt Transport Services (JBHT)</p><p><b>Tuesday</b></p><p>Before market open: <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FITBO\">Fifth Third Bancorp</a>. (FITB), Johnson &amp; Johnson (JNJ), <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CFG\">Citizens Financial Group</a> (CFG), Halliburton (HAL), <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TFC\">Truist Financial Corp</a>. (TFC), Hasbro (HAS), Lockheed Martin (LMT)</p><p>After market close: Netflix (NFLX), <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/IBM\">IBM</a> (IBM), First Horizon Corp. (FHN)</p><p><b>Wednesday</b></p><p>Before market open: Anthem (ANTM), Nasdaq (NDAQ), Baker Hughes (BKR), Procter &amp; Gamble (PG), Abbott Laboratories (ABT)</p><p>After market close: CSX Corp. (CSX), United Airlines (UAL), Crown Castle International (CCI), Alcoa Corp. (AA), Equifax (EFX), <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/STLD\">Steel Dynamics</a> (STLD), Tesla (TSLA), Tenet Healthcare (THC), Kinder Morgan (KMI)</p><p><b>Thursday</b></p><p>Before market open: Xerox (XRX), AT&amp;T (T), Dow Inc. (DOW), Las Vegas Sands (LVS), <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SAVE\">Spirit Airlines</a> (SAVE), Blackstone (BX), Danaher (DHR), American Airlines (AAL), Pool Corp. (POOL), <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AN\">AutoNation</a> (AN), Alaska Air Group (ALK), Tractor Supply Co. (TSCO), Philip Morris International (PM), Union Pacific (UNP),</p><p>After market close: Boston Beer Co. (SAM), Snap (SNAP)</p><p><b>Friday</b></p><p>Before market open: Verizon (VZ), Schlumberger (SLB), American Express (AXP), Kimberly-Clark (KMB)</p><p>After market close: <i>No notable reports scheduled for release</i></p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Netflix, Tesla Earnings: What to Know in Markets This Week</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nNetflix, Tesla Earnings: What to Know in Markets This Week\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-04-18 07:19 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/netflix-tesla-earnings-what-to-know-in-markets-this-week-154106070.html><strong>Yahoo Finance</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>This week, earnings season is set to ramp up, offering investors a fresh set of data on the strength of corporate profits in the face of elevated inflationary pressure.Two of the major names reporting...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/netflix-tesla-earnings-what-to-know-in-markets-this-week-154106070.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯","NFLX":"奈飞","TSLA":"特斯拉",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/netflix-tesla-earnings-what-to-know-in-markets-this-week-154106070.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2228379987","content_text":"This week, earnings season is set to ramp up, offering investors a fresh set of data on the strength of corporate profits in the face of elevated inflationary pressure.Two of the major names reporting this week will include Netflix (NFLX) and Tesla (TSLA), offering an early look at how some of the mega-cap technology companies performed in the early part of the year.The other names set to report this week will span a range of industries, broadening out from last week's bank-dominated results. Companies including United Airlines (UAL), American Express (AXP), Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) and Kimberly-Clark (KMB) are each on deck to report in the coming days.For earnings season so far, results have been mixed, albeit heavily skewed toward the slew of financial names that reported last week including JPMorgan Chase (JPM) and Goldman Sachs (GS). About 7% of S&P 500 index components have reported actual Q1 results so far, and 77% of these have topped Wall Street's earnings per share (EPS) estimates, matching the five-year average percentage, according to data from FactSet. The estimated earnings growth rate for the index currently stands at 5.1%, which if carried through the rest of the season would mark the lowest earnings growth rate for the index since the fourth quarter of 2020.Netflix earningsNetflix is set to report results on Tuesday, with investors closely watching for further signs of a slowdown in the streaming giant's growth after a pandemic-era surge in subscriber numbers.Analysts' consensus estimates are looking for Netflix to have added about 2.51 million subscribers for the first quarter, which would mark the least since the second quarter of 2021. This would bring Netflix's total subscribers to just under 225 million. In the same quarter last year, subscribers grew by nearly 4 million.Though Netflix has already seen subscriber growth slow sharply from a pandemic-era peak, the streaming giant's exit from Russia in early March is also set to further contribute to the deceleration. The Los Gatos, Calif.-based company suspended operations in Russia on March 6 over the country's invasion of Ukraine, and since then, analysts further trimmed their subscriber estimates.\"We now expect paid net adds of 1.45MM, below guide of 2.5MM given Russia suspension (~1MM subs),\" Cowen analyst John Blackledge wrote in a note last week. The firm also lowered its price target on Netflix to $590 a share from $600 previously, on account of the lower subscriber growth forecast.Other analysts also suggested that Netflix's churn, or subscriber losses, could increase in the quarter after the company announced a price increase for subscribers in the U.S. and Canada in January. But revenue pulled from these price increases could also be used to help Netflix build out bigger content slates and drive growth in less saturated markets internationally, others pointed out.\"Netflix appears to be nearing a ceiling on UCAN (U.S. and Canada) subscribers, and is pulling new levers to lower churn,\" Wedbush analyst Michael Pachter wrote in a note. \"Subscription price increases in the West should fuel additional content production and growth in other regions, and our bias is that cash flow will turn positive in 2022 and beyond, as management has guided. However, subscriber growth will likely occur primarily in less developed regions at lower subscription prices, with Western subscribers paying higher rates to fund new content.\"\"Content dumps, where all episodes of a new season are delivered at the same instant, will likely keep churn high, as price conscious consumers can swap out of Netflix and shift to a competitor service after viewing the content they desire,\" he added. \"Sustainable profit growth should continue so long as Netflix is able to continue raising subscription prices, but competition may limit future price increases.\"Overall, Netflix is expected to report GAAP earnings of $2.91 per share on revenue of $7.95 billion, which on the top line would represent just a 11% increase over last year. In the same quarter in 2021, revenue grew 24%.Shares of Netflix have fallen 43% for the year-to-date in 2022, underperforming against the S&P 500's 7.8% drop over that same period.Tesla earningsMeanwhile, another major company set to report results this week will be Tesla.The electric vehicle maker is scheduled to post its quarterly report Wednesday after market close. Ahead of these results, Tesla announced record deliveries of more than 310,000 during the first three months of this year. That represented a 68% jump over last year's deliveries. Tesla has sought to average 50% growth in annual vehicle deliveries.Production, however, slipped slightly on a quarter-over-quarter basis, with output coming in at 305,407 for the first quarter compared to 305,840 during the final three months of 2021. Tesla, like many other automakers, has continued to grapple with lingering supply chain challenges and rising input costs, leading CEO Elon Musk to suggest that the company may begin mining its own lithium for batteries as metal prices soar.\"Right now Tesla has a high-class problem of demand outstripping supply with this issue now translating into ~5-6 month delays for Model Ys, some Model 3s in different parts of the globe,\" Wedbush analyst Dan Ives wrote in a note. \"The key to alleviating these issues is centered around the key Giga openings in Austin and Berlin which will alleviate the bottlenecks of production for Tesla globally.\"Just earlier this month, Tesla officially began delivering its first Texas-made vehicles from its new Austin Gigafactory. At Tesla's \"Cyber Rodeo\" launch party on April 7, Musk said the facility was aiming to begin building the Tesla Cybertruck starting in 2023 and has targeted making 500,000 units of the Model Y per year.The newly made U.S. Gigafactory is set to be pivotal in helping Tesla further ramp production and help meet demand domestically, especially given snarls internationally as Tesla's Shanghai Gigafactory closed for weeks due to a COVID outbreak in the region.\"We believe by the end of 2022 Tesla will have the run rate capacity for overall ~2 million units annually from roughly 1 million today,\" Ives added. \"While the China zero COVID policy is causing shutdowns in Shanghai for Tesla (and others) and remains a worrying trend if it continues, seeing the forest through the trees with Austin and Berlin now live and ramping, Musk & Co. will continue to flex its distribution muscles in the EV landscape while many other automakers struggle to get things off the ground.\"While Tesla shares have outperformed the S&P 500 for the year-to-date, the stock came under pressure on Thursday after Musk disclosed he made an offer to buy social media company Twitter (TWTR) for $54.20 per share, or about $43 billion in cash. Many have noted Musk would likely have to sell Tesla shares in order to finance the deal if it were to go through.In Tesla's first-quarter results, Wall Street is looking for the company to post adjusted earnings of $2.27 per share on revenue of $17.85 billion, representing sales growth of 65%.Economic calendarMonday: NAHB Housing Market Index, April (77 expected, 79 in March)Tuesday: Housing starts, March (1.745 million expected, 1.769 million in February); Building permits, March (1.830 million expected, 1.859 million in February)Wednesday: MBA Mortgage Applications, week ended April 15 (-1.3% during prior week); Existing home sales, March (5.78 million expected, 6.02 million in February); Federal Reserve releases Beige BookThursday: Philadelphia Fed Business Outlook index, April (20.5 expected, 27.4 in March); Initial jobless claims, week ended April 16 (185,000 during prior week); Continuing claims, week ended April 9 (1.475 million during prior week); Leading Index, March (0.3% expected, 0.3% in February)Friday: S&P Global U.S. Manufacturing PMI, April preliminary (57.8 expected, 58.8 in March); S&P Global U.S. Services PMI, April preliminary (58.1 expected, 58.0 in March); S&P Global U.S. Composite PMI, April preliminary (57.7 in March)Earnings calendarMondayBefore market open: Synchrony Financial (SYF), Bank of New York Mellon Corp. (BK), Bank of America (BAC), Charles Schwab (SCHW)After market close: JB Hunt Transport Services (JBHT)TuesdayBefore market open: Fifth Third Bancorp. (FITB), Johnson & Johnson (JNJ), Citizens Financial Group (CFG), Halliburton (HAL), Truist Financial Corp. (TFC), Hasbro (HAS), Lockheed Martin (LMT)After market close: Netflix (NFLX), IBM (IBM), First Horizon Corp. (FHN)WednesdayBefore market open: Anthem (ANTM), Nasdaq (NDAQ), Baker Hughes (BKR), Procter & Gamble (PG), Abbott Laboratories (ABT)After market close: CSX Corp. (CSX), United Airlines (UAL), Crown Castle International (CCI), Alcoa Corp. (AA), Equifax (EFX), Steel Dynamics (STLD), Tesla (TSLA), Tenet Healthcare (THC), Kinder Morgan (KMI)ThursdayBefore market open: Xerox (XRX), AT&T (T), Dow Inc. (DOW), Las Vegas Sands (LVS), Spirit Airlines (SAVE), Blackstone (BX), Danaher (DHR), American Airlines (AAL), Pool Corp. (POOL), AutoNation (AN), Alaska Air Group (ALK), Tractor Supply Co. (TSCO), Philip Morris International (PM), Union Pacific (UNP),After market close: Boston Beer Co. (SAM), Snap (SNAP)FridayBefore market open: Verizon (VZ), Schlumberger (SLB), American Express (AXP), Kimberly-Clark (KMB)After market close: No notable reports scheduled for release","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":56,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9051800429,"gmtCreate":1654657662661,"gmtModify":1676535487336,"author":{"id":"3562758894473836","authorId":"3562758894473836","name":"Kaelyn","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3562758894473836","authorIdStr":"3562758894473836"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[smile]&nbsp;","listText":"[smile]&nbsp;","text":"[smile]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9051800429","repostId":"1101649003","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1101649003","pubTimestamp":1654656346,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1101649003?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-06-08 10:45","market":"us","language":"en","title":"TSLA Stock Analysis: 3 Innovations That Will Make Tesla the First $10 Trillion Company","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1101649003","media":"InvestorPlace","summary":"Wright's Research believes Tesla(TSLA) can become the first $10 trillion company.The firm sees signi","content":"<html><head></head><body><ul><li>Wright&#39;s Research believes <b>Tesla</b>(<b><u>TSLA</u></b>) can become the first $10 trillion company.</li><li>The firm sees significant potential for Tesla in areas outside of electric vehicle(EV) production.</li><li>According to the firm, TSLA stock is fully discounted at current levels.</li></ul><p><b>Tesla</b>(NASDAQ:<b><u>TSLA</u></b>) stock has received several Wall Street downgrades in the past month, with some previously bullish analysts issuing lower price targets overproduction and competition concerns. However, Wright’s Research sees significant potential for the EV leader. The firm believes Tesla can become the world’s first company<i> worth $10 trillion</i>.</p><p>This positive report comes at a good time for TSLA stock. Yesterday, shares rose after CEO Elon Musk threatened to pull out of an acquisition deal for <b>Twitter</b>(NYSE:<b><u>TWTR</u></b>). Today, shares are barely in the green. TSLA stock rose early this morning, but shares have been turbulent since as they struggle to recover from a recent layoffs announcement.</p><p>Let’s take a look at what this latest bull thesis would mean for TSLA stock.</p><p><b>TSLA Stock Analysis: 3 Key Innovations</b></p><p>Wright’s Research isn’t telling investors to disregard the EV component behind TSLA stock. But the firm does believe Tesla’s other innovations will play a big role in its growth. There’s one particular sentiment at the center of the report; no one should see Tesla as “just a car company.”</p><p>According to the firm, three key areas will help drive Tesla toward $10 trillion.</p><p><i>1. EV Market Scalability, Decreasing Battery Costs:</i></p><p>Wright’s Research is impressed with Tesla’s EV component, despite recent production constraints. The firm says that, as the total car market grows at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 3.5% between 2020 and 2030, “the total car market is expected to reach 90M units per year.” However, while some forecast 50% penetration of the EV market by 2030, Wright’s predicts closer to 60%. The firm believes falling battery costs — a result of continued innovation — will help increase EV adoption.</p><p>Wright’s sees significant scalability for the EV sector, specifically for Tesla. It predicts that the “initial purchase cost of an EV will be the same as that of a regular gasoline car” by 2023. If the firm’s 60% penetration estimate holds, 54 million out of 90 million units hitting the market will be electric. So, along with its 20% EV market share, Tesla also stands to gain a 12% share of the total car market.</p><p><i>2. Fully Autonomous Vehicles:</i></p><p>Wright’s also believes Tesla may receive future regulatory approval for fully automated vehicle sales. The research firm says this kind of development would “radically” change its outlook:</p><blockquote>“In that case, Tesla could drastically lower its ASP to sell/ deploy many autonomous vehicles, and lower the cost of ownership because owners would be able to generate income from their car when they are not using it, provided they are willing to run it on Tesla’s autonomous taxi network.”</blockquote><p>This future seems far off. But passive income from autonomous vehicles would certainly help boost sales as well as TSLA stock. Wright’s also notes that Tesla would be able to offer a better insurance price due to its data collection advantage. The firm says, “The combination of EVs and autonomy could reduce the cost per mile of cars to 25 cents, or half the cost of a passenger car.”</p><p><i>3. Data Collection, AI and Optimus:</i></p><p>Finally, Wright’s highlights the power of Tesla’s extensive data collecting in its report. The firm sees this as a hidden asset TSLA stock investors shouldn’t overlook:</p><blockquote>“The amount of data that Tesla has been able to collect over the past 7+ years, overbillions of milesdriven and ridden in tens of thousands of cars, gives them a light-years head start on the competition, which is only now beginning to collect data and explore fully self-driving cars.”</blockquote><p>The research firm also sees value in Tesla’s innovations in artificial intelligence (AI). Its EV component could potentially generate millions in revenue once its full-self driving (FSD) technology is fully approved. But the firm also notes that Tesla’s AI advances have broader applications. Specifically, although updates on the humanoid robot have been delayed, Wright’s believes Optimus has tremendous potential to disrupt job markets. This forecast is similar to Elon Musk’s prediction that Optimus will eventually be“worth more than the car business.”</p></body></html>","source":"lsy1606302653667","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>TSLA Stock Analysis: 3 Innovations That Will Make Tesla the First $10 Trillion Company</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTSLA Stock Analysis: 3 Innovations That Will Make Tesla the First $10 Trillion Company\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-06-08 10:45 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://investorplace.com/2022/06/tsla-stock-analysis-3-innovations-that-will-make-tesla-the-first-10-trillion-company/><strong>InvestorPlace</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Wright's Research believes Tesla(TSLA) can become the first $10 trillion company.The firm sees significant potential for Tesla in areas outside of electric vehicle(EV) production.According to the firm...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://investorplace.com/2022/06/tsla-stock-analysis-3-innovations-that-will-make-tesla-the-first-10-trillion-company/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"https://investorplace.com/2022/06/tsla-stock-analysis-3-innovations-that-will-make-tesla-the-first-10-trillion-company/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1101649003","content_text":"Wright's Research believes Tesla(TSLA) can become the first $10 trillion company.The firm sees significant potential for Tesla in areas outside of electric vehicle(EV) production.According to the firm, TSLA stock is fully discounted at current levels.Tesla(NASDAQ:TSLA) stock has received several Wall Street downgrades in the past month, with some previously bullish analysts issuing lower price targets overproduction and competition concerns. However, Wright’s Research sees significant potential for the EV leader. The firm believes Tesla can become the world’s first company worth $10 trillion.This positive report comes at a good time for TSLA stock. Yesterday, shares rose after CEO Elon Musk threatened to pull out of an acquisition deal for Twitter(NYSE:TWTR). Today, shares are barely in the green. TSLA stock rose early this morning, but shares have been turbulent since as they struggle to recover from a recent layoffs announcement.Let’s take a look at what this latest bull thesis would mean for TSLA stock.TSLA Stock Analysis: 3 Key InnovationsWright’s Research isn’t telling investors to disregard the EV component behind TSLA stock. But the firm does believe Tesla’s other innovations will play a big role in its growth. There’s one particular sentiment at the center of the report; no one should see Tesla as “just a car company.”According to the firm, three key areas will help drive Tesla toward $10 trillion.1. EV Market Scalability, Decreasing Battery Costs:Wright’s Research is impressed with Tesla’s EV component, despite recent production constraints. The firm says that, as the total car market grows at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 3.5% between 2020 and 2030, “the total car market is expected to reach 90M units per year.” However, while some forecast 50% penetration of the EV market by 2030, Wright’s predicts closer to 60%. The firm believes falling battery costs — a result of continued innovation — will help increase EV adoption.Wright’s sees significant scalability for the EV sector, specifically for Tesla. It predicts that the “initial purchase cost of an EV will be the same as that of a regular gasoline car” by 2023. If the firm’s 60% penetration estimate holds, 54 million out of 90 million units hitting the market will be electric. So, along with its 20% EV market share, Tesla also stands to gain a 12% share of the total car market.2. Fully Autonomous Vehicles:Wright’s also believes Tesla may receive future regulatory approval for fully automated vehicle sales. The research firm says this kind of development would “radically” change its outlook:“In that case, Tesla could drastically lower its ASP to sell/ deploy many autonomous vehicles, and lower the cost of ownership because owners would be able to generate income from their car when they are not using it, provided they are willing to run it on Tesla’s autonomous taxi network.”This future seems far off. But passive income from autonomous vehicles would certainly help boost sales as well as TSLA stock. Wright’s also notes that Tesla would be able to offer a better insurance price due to its data collection advantage. The firm says, “The combination of EVs and autonomy could reduce the cost per mile of cars to 25 cents, or half the cost of a passenger car.”3. Data Collection, AI and Optimus:Finally, Wright’s highlights the power of Tesla’s extensive data collecting in its report. The firm sees this as a hidden asset TSLA stock investors shouldn’t overlook:“The amount of data that Tesla has been able to collect over the past 7+ years, overbillions of milesdriven and ridden in tens of thousands of cars, gives them a light-years head start on the competition, which is only now beginning to collect data and explore fully self-driving cars.”The research firm also sees value in Tesla’s innovations in artificial intelligence (AI). Its EV component could potentially generate millions in revenue once its full-self driving (FSD) technology is fully approved. But the firm also notes that Tesla’s AI advances have broader applications. Specifically, although updates on the humanoid robot have been delayed, Wright’s believes Optimus has tremendous potential to disrupt job markets. This forecast is similar to Elon Musk’s prediction that Optimus will eventually be“worth more than the car business.”","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":265,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9050796520,"gmtCreate":1654236315260,"gmtModify":1676535418275,"author":{"id":"3562758894473836","authorId":"3562758894473836","name":"Kaelyn","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3562758894473836","authorIdStr":"3562758894473836"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[smile]&nbsp;","listText":"[smile]&nbsp;","text":"[smile]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9050796520","repostId":"2240266262","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2240266262","pubTimestamp":1654211541,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2240266262?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-06-03 07:12","market":"us","language":"en","title":"US STOCKS-Wall Street Ends Sharply Higher, Led By Tesla and Nvidia","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2240266262","media":"Reuters","summary":"Wall Street ended sharply higher on Thursday, led by Tesla, Nvidia and other megacap growth stocks i","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Wall Street ended sharply higher on Thursday, led by Tesla, Nvidia and other megacap growth stocks in a choppy session ahead of a key jobs report due on Friday.</p><p>Tesla, Nvidia and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FB\">Meta Platforms</a> each rose more than 4%, fueling gains in the S&amp;P 500 and Nasdaq. Amazon rallied 3.1% and Apple added 1.7%.</p><p>Of the 11 S&amp;P 500 sector indexes, 10 rose, led by Consumer Discretionary, up 3.03%, followed by a 2.69% gain in Materials.</p><p>U.S. stocks recovered from a drop earlier in the day after Federal Reserve Vice Chair Lael Brainard said she backs at least a couple more half percentage point interest rate hikes, and sees little case for pausing rate hikes in September if price pressures fail to cool.</p><p>The U.S. stock market has staged a modest recovery in recent sessions, with investors debating whether the worst of a selloff that has dominated Wall Street in 2022 may be over.</p><p>&#34;Volatility has become the norm, not the exception. Stocks are being held hostage by inflation, and until inflation gets under control, volatility is likely to remain high,&#34; warned Terry Sandven, chief equity strategist at U.S. Bank Wealth Management in Minneapolis, Minnesota.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 is now down about 13% from its record high close in early January.</p><p>The Philadelphia Semiconductor index jumped 3.6% to end at its highest level in almost a month.</p><p>U.S. private payrolls increased far less than expected in May, suggesting demand for labor was starting to slow amid higher interest rates and tightening financial conditions, the ADP National Employment report showed.</p><p>All eyes are now on the government&#39;s nonfarm payrolls data on Friday, with investors looking for fresh signs of the U.S. economy&#39;s health and how aggressively the Fed may continue to raise interest rates. Analysts are expecting the economy to have added 325,000 jobs last month.</p><p>Unofficially, the S&amp;P 500 climbed 1.84% to end the session at 4,176.82 points.</p><p>The Nasdaq gained 2.69% to 12,316.90 points, while Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 1.33% to 33,248.28 points.</p><p>Microsoft rose 0.8%, even after the software maker cut its fourth-quarter forecast for profit and revenue, making it the latest U.S. company to warn of a hit from a stronger U.S. dollar.</p><p>Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co slid 5.2% after the technology firm gave a disappointing full-year forecast due to currency headwinds and its exit from Russia.</p><p>Veeva Systems rallied almost 15% after the life sciences software seller&#39;s quarterly revenue forecast beat expectations.</p><p>Ford Motor Co rose 2.5% after the automaker said it plans to invest $3.7 billion in assembly plants in Michigan, Ohio and Missouri.</p><p>Across the U.S. stock market, advancing stocks outnumbered falling ones by a 3.5-to-<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> ratio.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 posted one new high and 29 new lows; the Nasdaq recorded 33 new highs and 107 new lows.</p><p>Volume on U.S. exchanges was relatively light, with 10.7 billion shares traded, compared with an average of 13.3 billion shares over the previous 20 sessions.</p><p></p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>US STOCKS-Wall Street Ends Sharply Higher, Led By Tesla and Nvidia</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nUS STOCKS-Wall Street Ends Sharply Higher, Led By Tesla and Nvidia\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-06-03 07:12 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/us-stocks-wall-street-ends-202053661.html><strong>Reuters</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Wall Street ended sharply higher on Thursday, led by Tesla, Nvidia and other megacap growth stocks in a choppy session ahead of a key jobs report due on Friday.Tesla, Nvidia and Meta Platforms each ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/us-stocks-wall-street-ends-202053661.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/us-stocks-wall-street-ends-202053661.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2240266262","content_text":"Wall Street ended sharply higher on Thursday, led by Tesla, Nvidia and other megacap growth stocks in a choppy session ahead of a key jobs report due on Friday.Tesla, Nvidia and Meta Platforms each rose more than 4%, fueling gains in the S&P 500 and Nasdaq. Amazon rallied 3.1% and Apple added 1.7%.Of the 11 S&P 500 sector indexes, 10 rose, led by Consumer Discretionary, up 3.03%, followed by a 2.69% gain in Materials.U.S. stocks recovered from a drop earlier in the day after Federal Reserve Vice Chair Lael Brainard said she backs at least a couple more half percentage point interest rate hikes, and sees little case for pausing rate hikes in September if price pressures fail to cool.The U.S. stock market has staged a modest recovery in recent sessions, with investors debating whether the worst of a selloff that has dominated Wall Street in 2022 may be over.\"Volatility has become the norm, not the exception. Stocks are being held hostage by inflation, and until inflation gets under control, volatility is likely to remain high,\" warned Terry Sandven, chief equity strategist at U.S. Bank Wealth Management in Minneapolis, Minnesota.The S&P 500 is now down about 13% from its record high close in early January.The Philadelphia Semiconductor index jumped 3.6% to end at its highest level in almost a month.U.S. private payrolls increased far less than expected in May, suggesting demand for labor was starting to slow amid higher interest rates and tightening financial conditions, the ADP National Employment report showed.All eyes are now on the government's nonfarm payrolls data on Friday, with investors looking for fresh signs of the U.S. economy's health and how aggressively the Fed may continue to raise interest rates. Analysts are expecting the economy to have added 325,000 jobs last month.Unofficially, the S&P 500 climbed 1.84% to end the session at 4,176.82 points.The Nasdaq gained 2.69% to 12,316.90 points, while Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 1.33% to 33,248.28 points.Microsoft rose 0.8%, even after the software maker cut its fourth-quarter forecast for profit and revenue, making it the latest U.S. company to warn of a hit from a stronger U.S. dollar.Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co slid 5.2% after the technology firm gave a disappointing full-year forecast due to currency headwinds and its exit from Russia.Veeva Systems rallied almost 15% after the life sciences software seller's quarterly revenue forecast beat expectations.Ford Motor Co rose 2.5% after the automaker said it plans to invest $3.7 billion in assembly plants in Michigan, Ohio and Missouri.Across the U.S. stock market, advancing stocks outnumbered falling ones by a 3.5-to-one ratio.The S&P 500 posted one new high and 29 new lows; the Nasdaq recorded 33 new highs and 107 new lows.Volume on U.S. exchanges was relatively light, with 10.7 billion shares traded, compared with an average of 13.3 billion shares over the previous 20 sessions.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":189,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9050332799,"gmtCreate":1654131320711,"gmtModify":1676535399877,"author":{"id":"3562758894473836","authorId":"3562758894473836","name":"Kaelyn","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3562758894473836","authorIdStr":"3562758894473836"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[smile]&nbsp;","listText":"[smile]&nbsp;","text":"[smile]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9050332799","repostId":"1150961641","repostType":2,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":676,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9069423247,"gmtCreate":1651341609818,"gmtModify":1676534892070,"author":{"id":"3562758894473836","authorId":"3562758894473836","name":"Kaelyn","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3562758894473836","authorIdStr":"3562758894473836"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[smile]&nbsp;","listText":"[smile]&nbsp;","text":"[smile]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9069423247","repostId":"1191701836","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1191701836","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1651332063,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1191701836?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-04-30 23:21","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Warren Buffett: We Didn't Repurchase Any Berkshire Stock in April","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1191701836","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Warren Buffett hasn't used the market pullback in April to repurchase any shares of Berkshire Hathaw","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Warren Buffett hasn&#39;t used the market pullback in April to repurchase any shares of Berkshire Hathaway, perhaps a signal he expects more volatility ahead amid rising interest rates and nagging inflationary pressures.</p><p>&#34;We haven&#39;t repurchased any shares at all in April,&#34; Buffett said at the Berkshire Hathaway annual meeting on Saturday. &#34;We&#39;re back somewhat to our more lethargic mood, but anything could change for sure.&#34;</p><p>Berkshire has made massive repurchases of Berkshire stock in the past but has also taken years-long breaks from the practice The company repurchased $3.2 billion of its own stock in the first quarter.</p><p>More recently, Berkshire shares haven&#39;t been immune to the broader market pullback.</p><p>Shares of Berkshire&#39;s class A and class B shares are down about 6.2% so far in the month, outperforming the 8% drop in the S&amp;P 500.</p><p>While Buffett has temporarily stopped buying Berkshire shares, he continues to bet big elsewhere.</p><p>Buffett bought $51 billion in stock in the first quarter, according to the company&#39;s latest earnings release.</p><p>The billionaire investor&#39;s empire upped stakes in oil giants <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/OXY\">Occidental Petroleum</a> and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CVX\">Chevron</a> while also investing $4.2 billion to become the largest investor in computing leader <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/HPQ\">HP Inc.</a>.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Warren Buffett: We Didn't Repurchase Any Berkshire Stock in April</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWarren Buffett: We Didn't Repurchase Any Berkshire Stock in April\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-04-30 23:21</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>Warren Buffett hasn&#39;t used the market pullback in April to repurchase any shares of Berkshire Hathaway, perhaps a signal he expects more volatility ahead amid rising interest rates and nagging inflationary pressures.</p><p>&#34;We haven&#39;t repurchased any shares at all in April,&#34; Buffett said at the Berkshire Hathaway annual meeting on Saturday. &#34;We&#39;re back somewhat to our more lethargic mood, but anything could change for sure.&#34;</p><p>Berkshire has made massive repurchases of Berkshire stock in the past but has also taken years-long breaks from the practice The company repurchased $3.2 billion of its own stock in the first quarter.</p><p>More recently, Berkshire shares haven&#39;t been immune to the broader market pullback.</p><p>Shares of Berkshire&#39;s class A and class B shares are down about 6.2% so far in the month, outperforming the 8% drop in the S&amp;P 500.</p><p>While Buffett has temporarily stopped buying Berkshire shares, he continues to bet big elsewhere.</p><p>Buffett bought $51 billion in stock in the first quarter, according to the company&#39;s latest earnings release.</p><p>The billionaire investor&#39;s empire upped stakes in oil giants <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/OXY\">Occidental Petroleum</a> and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CVX\">Chevron</a> while also investing $4.2 billion to become the largest investor in computing leader <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/HPQ\">HP Inc.</a>.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BRK.A":"伯克希尔","BRK.B":"伯克希尔B"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1191701836","content_text":"Warren Buffett hasn't used the market pullback in April to repurchase any shares of Berkshire Hathaway, perhaps a signal he expects more volatility ahead amid rising interest rates and nagging inflationary pressures.\"We haven't repurchased any shares at all in April,\" Buffett said at the Berkshire Hathaway annual meeting on Saturday. \"We're back somewhat to our more lethargic mood, but anything could change for sure.\"Berkshire has made massive repurchases of Berkshire stock in the past but has also taken years-long breaks from the practice The company repurchased $3.2 billion of its own stock in the first quarter.More recently, Berkshire shares haven't been immune to the broader market pullback.Shares of Berkshire's class A and class B shares are down about 6.2% so far in the month, outperforming the 8% drop in the S&P 500.While Buffett has temporarily stopped buying Berkshire shares, he continues to bet big elsewhere.Buffett bought $51 billion in stock in the first quarter, according to the company's latest earnings release.The billionaire investor's empire upped stakes in oil giants Occidental Petroleum and Chevron while also investing $4.2 billion to become the largest investor in computing leader HP Inc..","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":175,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9086390601,"gmtCreate":1650413795375,"gmtModify":1676534717560,"author":{"id":"3562758894473836","authorId":"3562758894473836","name":"Kaelyn","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3562758894473836","authorIdStr":"3562758894473836"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[smile]&nbsp;","listText":"[smile]&nbsp;","text":"[smile]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9086390601","repostId":"2228916468","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2228916468","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1650410146,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2228916468?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-04-20 07:15","market":"us","language":"en","title":"US STOCKS-Wall Street Ends Higher as Earnings Optimism Outshines Rising Yields","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2228916468","media":"Reuters","summary":"* U.S. 30-year bond yield hits 3%* IMF cuts global growth forecast for 2022* J&J hits record high after earningsApril 19 (Reuters) - U.S. stocks ended higher on Tuesday, as investors used positive ear","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>* U.S. 30-year bond yield hits 3%</p><p>* IMF cuts global growth forecast for 2022</p><p>* J&amp;J hits record high after earnings</p><p>April 19 (Reuters) - U.S. stocks ended higher on Tuesday, as investors used positive earnings to advance Wall Street&#39;s main indexes and took relief from two U.S. Federal Reserve officials offering more dovish comments on interest rate rises than <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> of their counterparts.</p><p>Shares of megacap companies, including Microsoft Corp, Apple Inc and Amazon.com Inc, rose even as Treasury yields extended a recent surge.</p><p>Johnson &amp; Johnson advanced to a record high, before pulling back slightly, as its quarterly profit exceeded market expectations and it raised its dividend payout.</p><p>Of the 49 companies in the S&amp;P 500 index that have reported quarterly earnings so far, 79.6% have exceeded profit estimates, as per Refinitiv data. Typically, 66% beat estimates.</p><p>&#34;It certainly feels like every earnings season, especially since March 2020, is more important than the next, but particularly given where we sit in the economic cycle, the Fed&#39;s rate hike cycle, and the elevated inflation backdrop,&#34; said Max Grinacoff, equity derivatives strategist at <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BNPQF\">BNP Paribas</a>.</p><p>&#34;So it all comes down to whether corporate earnings will remain resilient, in the face of what we have seen year-to-date geopolitically and with the U.S. economic picture. It will be a true test.&#34;</p><p>St. Louis Federal Reserve Bank President James Bullard on Monday repeated his case for increasing the rates to 3.5% by the end of the year to slow a 40-year-high inflation. He also said he did not rule out a 75 basis points rate hike.</p><p>Stocks appeared to brush aside the remarks, and the main indexes rallied further in late afternoon trading after both Chicago Federal Reserve Bank President Charles Evans and Atlanta Federal Reserve Bank President Raphael Bostic offered more dovish comments.</p><p>Bond yields continued their recent moves higher though. The 30-year yield exceeded 3% for the first time since April 2019. The 10-year tips &lt; US10YTIP=RR&gt; yield turned positive for the first time since March 2020, the start of the coronavirus pandemic.</p><p>&#34;We typically assume higher yields should be beneficial for banks, but that correlation has broken down a bit and it&#39;s been the sectors most negatively-correlated to rising rates - defensive sectors - which have actually rallied,&#34; said BNP&#39;s Grinacoff.</p><p>&#34;We do think that is due to some recessionary fears starting to be priced in.&#34;</p><p>According to preliminary data, the S&amp;P 500 gained 72.36 points, or 1.65%, to end at 4,464.05 points, while the Nasdaq Composite gained 287.13 points, or 2.15%, to 13,619.49. The Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 519.57 points, or 1.51%, to 34,931.26.</p><p>Most of the 11 major S&amp;P subsectors were higher, led by consumer discretionary stocks. Among the best performers in the index were gaming companies, with Wynn Resorts Inc, Caesars Entertainment Inc and Penn National Gaming Inc all posting strong gains.</p><p>Energy stocks fell as oil prices tumbled 5.2% after the International Monetary Fund cut its growth forecasts for the global economy and warned of higher inflation.</p><p>This year&#39;s rally in crude prices, which are still up around a third despite Tuesday&#39;s declines, helped Halliburton Co post an 85% rise in first-quarter adjusted profit as demand for its services and equipment increased. However, the oilfield services firm&#39;s shares were lower, amid the wider slump in energy stocks.</p><p>Travelers Cos Inc also fell, despite the property and casualty insurer posting a better-than-expected quarterly profit.</p><p>Meanwhile, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TWTR\">Twitter</a> Inc declined. More private equity firms have expressed interest in participating in a deal for the micro blogging site, according to reports.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>US STOCKS-Wall Street Ends Higher as Earnings Optimism Outshines Rising Yields</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nUS STOCKS-Wall Street Ends Higher as Earnings Optimism Outshines Rising Yields\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-04-20 07:15</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>* U.S. 30-year bond yield hits 3%</p><p>* IMF cuts global growth forecast for 2022</p><p>* J&amp;J hits record high after earnings</p><p>April 19 (Reuters) - U.S. stocks ended higher on Tuesday, as investors used positive earnings to advance Wall Street&#39;s main indexes and took relief from two U.S. Federal Reserve officials offering more dovish comments on interest rate rises than <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> of their counterparts.</p><p>Shares of megacap companies, including Microsoft Corp, Apple Inc and Amazon.com Inc, rose even as Treasury yields extended a recent surge.</p><p>Johnson &amp; Johnson advanced to a record high, before pulling back slightly, as its quarterly profit exceeded market expectations and it raised its dividend payout.</p><p>Of the 49 companies in the S&amp;P 500 index that have reported quarterly earnings so far, 79.6% have exceeded profit estimates, as per Refinitiv data. Typically, 66% beat estimates.</p><p>&#34;It certainly feels like every earnings season, especially since March 2020, is more important than the next, but particularly given where we sit in the economic cycle, the Fed&#39;s rate hike cycle, and the elevated inflation backdrop,&#34; said Max Grinacoff, equity derivatives strategist at <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BNPQF\">BNP Paribas</a>.</p><p>&#34;So it all comes down to whether corporate earnings will remain resilient, in the face of what we have seen year-to-date geopolitically and with the U.S. economic picture. It will be a true test.&#34;</p><p>St. Louis Federal Reserve Bank President James Bullard on Monday repeated his case for increasing the rates to 3.5% by the end of the year to slow a 40-year-high inflation. He also said he did not rule out a 75 basis points rate hike.</p><p>Stocks appeared to brush aside the remarks, and the main indexes rallied further in late afternoon trading after both Chicago Federal Reserve Bank President Charles Evans and Atlanta Federal Reserve Bank President Raphael Bostic offered more dovish comments.</p><p>Bond yields continued their recent moves higher though. The 30-year yield exceeded 3% for the first time since April 2019. The 10-year tips &lt; US10YTIP=RR&gt; yield turned positive for the first time since March 2020, the start of the coronavirus pandemic.</p><p>&#34;We typically assume higher yields should be beneficial for banks, but that correlation has broken down a bit and it&#39;s been the sectors most negatively-correlated to rising rates - defensive sectors - which have actually rallied,&#34; said BNP&#39;s Grinacoff.</p><p>&#34;We do think that is due to some recessionary fears starting to be priced in.&#34;</p><p>According to preliminary data, the S&amp;P 500 gained 72.36 points, or 1.65%, to end at 4,464.05 points, while the Nasdaq Composite gained 287.13 points, or 2.15%, to 13,619.49. The Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 519.57 points, or 1.51%, to 34,931.26.</p><p>Most of the 11 major S&amp;P subsectors were higher, led by consumer discretionary stocks. Among the best performers in the index were gaming companies, with Wynn Resorts Inc, Caesars Entertainment Inc and Penn National Gaming Inc all posting strong gains.</p><p>Energy stocks fell as oil prices tumbled 5.2% after the International Monetary Fund cut its growth forecasts for the global economy and warned of higher inflation.</p><p>This year&#39;s rally in crude prices, which are still up around a third despite Tuesday&#39;s declines, helped Halliburton Co post an 85% rise in first-quarter adjusted profit as demand for its services and equipment increased. However, the oilfield services firm&#39;s shares were lower, amid the wider slump in energy stocks.</p><p>Travelers Cos Inc also fell, despite the property and casualty insurer posting a better-than-expected quarterly profit.</p><p>Meanwhile, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TWTR\">Twitter</a> Inc declined. More private equity firms have expressed interest in participating in a deal for the micro blogging site, according to reports.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BAC":"美国银行","TWTR":"Twitter","WYNN":"永利度假村","AMZN":"亚马逊","AAPL":"苹果","MSFT":"微软","TRV":"旅行者财产险集团",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","PENN":"佩恩国民博彩",".DJI":"道琼斯","NFLX":"奈飞","WFC":"富国银行",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite","JNJ":"强生","CZR":"凯撒娱乐","HAL":"哈里伯顿","IBM":"IBM"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2228916468","content_text":"* U.S. 30-year bond yield hits 3%* IMF cuts global growth forecast for 2022* J&J hits record high after earningsApril 19 (Reuters) - U.S. stocks ended higher on Tuesday, as investors used positive earnings to advance Wall Street's main indexes and took relief from two U.S. Federal Reserve officials offering more dovish comments on interest rate rises than one of their counterparts.Shares of megacap companies, including Microsoft Corp, Apple Inc and Amazon.com Inc, rose even as Treasury yields extended a recent surge.Johnson & Johnson advanced to a record high, before pulling back slightly, as its quarterly profit exceeded market expectations and it raised its dividend payout.Of the 49 companies in the S&P 500 index that have reported quarterly earnings so far, 79.6% have exceeded profit estimates, as per Refinitiv data. Typically, 66% beat estimates.\"It certainly feels like every earnings season, especially since March 2020, is more important than the next, but particularly given where we sit in the economic cycle, the Fed's rate hike cycle, and the elevated inflation backdrop,\" said Max Grinacoff, equity derivatives strategist at BNP Paribas.\"So it all comes down to whether corporate earnings will remain resilient, in the face of what we have seen year-to-date geopolitically and with the U.S. economic picture. It will be a true test.\"St. Louis Federal Reserve Bank President James Bullard on Monday repeated his case for increasing the rates to 3.5% by the end of the year to slow a 40-year-high inflation. He also said he did not rule out a 75 basis points rate hike.Stocks appeared to brush aside the remarks, and the main indexes rallied further in late afternoon trading after both Chicago Federal Reserve Bank President Charles Evans and Atlanta Federal Reserve Bank President Raphael Bostic offered more dovish comments.Bond yields continued their recent moves higher though. The 30-year yield exceeded 3% for the first time since April 2019. The 10-year tips < US10YTIP=RR> yield turned positive for the first time since March 2020, the start of the coronavirus pandemic.\"We typically assume higher yields should be beneficial for banks, but that correlation has broken down a bit and it's been the sectors most negatively-correlated to rising rates - defensive sectors - which have actually rallied,\" said BNP's Grinacoff.\"We do think that is due to some recessionary fears starting to be priced in.\"According to preliminary data, the S&P 500 gained 72.36 points, or 1.65%, to end at 4,464.05 points, while the Nasdaq Composite gained 287.13 points, or 2.15%, to 13,619.49. The Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 519.57 points, or 1.51%, to 34,931.26.Most of the 11 major S&P subsectors were higher, led by consumer discretionary stocks. Among the best performers in the index were gaming companies, with Wynn Resorts Inc, Caesars Entertainment Inc and Penn National Gaming Inc all posting strong gains.Energy stocks fell as oil prices tumbled 5.2% after the International Monetary Fund cut its growth forecasts for the global economy and warned of higher inflation.This year's rally in crude prices, which are still up around a third despite Tuesday's declines, helped Halliburton Co post an 85% rise in first-quarter adjusted profit as demand for its services and equipment increased. However, the oilfield services firm's shares were lower, amid the wider slump in energy stocks.Travelers Cos Inc also fell, despite the property and casualty insurer posting a better-than-expected quarterly profit.Meanwhile, Twitter Inc declined. More private equity firms have expressed interest in participating in a deal for the micro blogging site, according to reports.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":179,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9088877533,"gmtCreate":1650334201712,"gmtModify":1676534699122,"author":{"id":"3562758894473836","authorId":"3562758894473836","name":"Kaelyn","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3562758894473836","authorIdStr":"3562758894473836"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[smile]&nbsp;","listText":"[smile]&nbsp;","text":"[smile]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9088877533","repostId":"1105840721","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1105840721","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1650324260,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1105840721?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-04-19 07:24","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Netflix Q1 Earnings are Coming: 3 Most Important Things to Watch","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1105840721","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX) is scheduled to announce Q1 earnings results after market closes on Tuesday, A","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX) is scheduled to announce Q1 earnings results after market closes on Tuesday, April 19.</p><p><b>Latest Results</b></p><p>In Q4 2021, Netflix added 8.28 million net new subscribers, a bit shy of the company&#39;s own forecast for 8.5 million net adds, and about in line with the Wall Street consensus forecast at 8.3 million. The company now has 221.8 million subscribers globally.</p><p>The company generated Q4 revenue of $7.7 billion, up 16%, and in line with the company&#39;s projection at $7.7 billion. Profits were $1.33 cents a share, well ahead of analysts at 83 cents, with the outperformance mostly due to an unrealized gain tied to the company&#39;s euro denominated debt.</p><p><b>Q1 Guidance</b></p><p>Netflix&#39;s projections for Q1 2022 were even lighter. The management&#39;s guidance is projecting 2.5 million net adds. While analysts on average predict 2.81 million in Q1, and 2.64 million in Q2, according to FactSet.</p><p>It sees Q1 revenue of $7.9 billion, up 10.3%, but well shy of the Street consensus at $8.2 billion.</p><p><b>3</b> <b>Most Important Things to Watch</b></p><p>1. Subscriber additions</p><p>As always, an important focus for investors will be Netflix&#39;s net paid subscriber additions. In Q3, Netflix saw a re-acceleration in its quarterly subscriber growth, as net additions came in at 8.3 million. Though this was notably below the 8.5 million net new subscribers the company had estimated it would add during the quarter, it was still good to see a significant sequential uptick from the 4.4 million members the company added in the prior quarter.</p><p>But what likely spooked investors was management&#39;s guidance for just 2.5 million net new paid subscribers inQ1 2022. This would be down significantly from the 4.0 million the company added inQ1 2021. This weak outlook, management explained, reflects the quarter&#39;s back-end weighted content slate.</p><p>2. Commentary on competition</p><p>Another red flag for Netflix investors in Q4 was management&#39;s nod to increasing competition. In a rare acknowledgment of competition having a negative impact on the company, management said, &#34;added competition may be affecting our marginal growth some...&#34;</p><p>Investors should look to see if management doubles down on this worrisome narrative or if it brings positive data points to the table regarding how it is faring in a competitive environment. Chances are, the worrisome remarks about competition will continue. But investors should note that the stock&#39;s big decline has arguably priced in expectations for heated competition going forward.</p><p>3. Subscriber-growth guidance</p><p>Of course, another key metric to watch will be the company&#39;s guidance for subscriber growth inQ2 2022. Technically, a back-weighted content slate in Q1 should positively impact Q2. Further, it&#39;s no secret that content production has been ramping back up from periods when much of the world was facing lockdowns. So lots of new content from Netflix should provide a catalyst for reaccelerated subscriber growth, assuming increasing competition isn&#39;t providing too much negative pressure.</p><p>While it&#39;s always tough to estimate how many subscribers Netflix will guide for, it would be nice to see guidance for second-quarter subscriber levels on par with pre-COVID levels again. To do this, the company would need to guide for around 2.7 million new subscribers in Q2.</p><p><b>Analyst Opinions</b></p><p>Truist analyst Matthew Thornton cut the price target of Netflix to $409 from $470.Thornton said in a research note that based on mobile app downloads, he believes the company&#39;s subscriber numbers in the first quarter will top expectations but thatQ2 outlook will come in below estimates, with consensus paid member adds being a &#34;slightly high hurdle,&#34; based on prior reports.</p><p>Stifel analyst Scott Devittmaintained a“Buy” rating and a $460 price target on Netflix’s shares. Devitt noted the loss of subscribers in Russia and ongoing disruption in EMEA may limit the upside to subscriber growth. And looking past the first quarter, Devitt is tempering his estimates for 2022 and beyond as he takes a more conservative approach to the subscriber and ARPU growth on worsening macro conditions and continued uncertainty.</p><p>JPMorgan analyst Doug Anmuth issued an “Overweight” rating and a $605 price target on Netflix’s shares. Anmuth was continuing to believe Netflix has meaningful room for further global subscriber penetration. And Anmuth believed Netflix is currently 29% penetrated among the approximately 776 million global broadband subscribers, 33% penetrated among the approximately 675 million current global pay-TV subscribers, and 31% penetrated among the approximately 712 million maximum global pay-TV subscribers.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Netflix Q1 Earnings are Coming: 3 Most Important Things to Watch</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nNetflix Q1 Earnings are Coming: 3 Most Important Things to Watch\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-04-19 07:24</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX) is scheduled to announce Q1 earnings results after market closes on Tuesday, April 19.</p><p><b>Latest Results</b></p><p>In Q4 2021, Netflix added 8.28 million net new subscribers, a bit shy of the company&#39;s own forecast for 8.5 million net adds, and about in line with the Wall Street consensus forecast at 8.3 million. The company now has 221.8 million subscribers globally.</p><p>The company generated Q4 revenue of $7.7 billion, up 16%, and in line with the company&#39;s projection at $7.7 billion. Profits were $1.33 cents a share, well ahead of analysts at 83 cents, with the outperformance mostly due to an unrealized gain tied to the company&#39;s euro denominated debt.</p><p><b>Q1 Guidance</b></p><p>Netflix&#39;s projections for Q1 2022 were even lighter. The management&#39;s guidance is projecting 2.5 million net adds. While analysts on average predict 2.81 million in Q1, and 2.64 million in Q2, according to FactSet.</p><p>It sees Q1 revenue of $7.9 billion, up 10.3%, but well shy of the Street consensus at $8.2 billion.</p><p><b>3</b> <b>Most Important Things to Watch</b></p><p>1. Subscriber additions</p><p>As always, an important focus for investors will be Netflix&#39;s net paid subscriber additions. In Q3, Netflix saw a re-acceleration in its quarterly subscriber growth, as net additions came in at 8.3 million. Though this was notably below the 8.5 million net new subscribers the company had estimated it would add during the quarter, it was still good to see a significant sequential uptick from the 4.4 million members the company added in the prior quarter.</p><p>But what likely spooked investors was management&#39;s guidance for just 2.5 million net new paid subscribers inQ1 2022. This would be down significantly from the 4.0 million the company added inQ1 2021. This weak outlook, management explained, reflects the quarter&#39;s back-end weighted content slate.</p><p>2. Commentary on competition</p><p>Another red flag for Netflix investors in Q4 was management&#39;s nod to increasing competition. In a rare acknowledgment of competition having a negative impact on the company, management said, &#34;added competition may be affecting our marginal growth some...&#34;</p><p>Investors should look to see if management doubles down on this worrisome narrative or if it brings positive data points to the table regarding how it is faring in a competitive environment. Chances are, the worrisome remarks about competition will continue. But investors should note that the stock&#39;s big decline has arguably priced in expectations for heated competition going forward.</p><p>3. Subscriber-growth guidance</p><p>Of course, another key metric to watch will be the company&#39;s guidance for subscriber growth inQ2 2022. Technically, a back-weighted content slate in Q1 should positively impact Q2. Further, it&#39;s no secret that content production has been ramping back up from periods when much of the world was facing lockdowns. So lots of new content from Netflix should provide a catalyst for reaccelerated subscriber growth, assuming increasing competition isn&#39;t providing too much negative pressure.</p><p>While it&#39;s always tough to estimate how many subscribers Netflix will guide for, it would be nice to see guidance for second-quarter subscriber levels on par with pre-COVID levels again. To do this, the company would need to guide for around 2.7 million new subscribers in Q2.</p><p><b>Analyst Opinions</b></p><p>Truist analyst Matthew Thornton cut the price target of Netflix to $409 from $470.Thornton said in a research note that based on mobile app downloads, he believes the company&#39;s subscriber numbers in the first quarter will top expectations but thatQ2 outlook will come in below estimates, with consensus paid member adds being a &#34;slightly high hurdle,&#34; based on prior reports.</p><p>Stifel analyst Scott Devittmaintained a“Buy” rating and a $460 price target on Netflix’s shares. Devitt noted the loss of subscribers in Russia and ongoing disruption in EMEA may limit the upside to subscriber growth. And looking past the first quarter, Devitt is tempering his estimates for 2022 and beyond as he takes a more conservative approach to the subscriber and ARPU growth on worsening macro conditions and continued uncertainty.</p><p>JPMorgan analyst Doug Anmuth issued an “Overweight” rating and a $605 price target on Netflix’s shares. Anmuth was continuing to believe Netflix has meaningful room for further global subscriber penetration. And Anmuth believed Netflix is currently 29% penetrated among the approximately 776 million global broadband subscribers, 33% penetrated among the approximately 675 million current global pay-TV subscribers, and 31% penetrated among the approximately 712 million maximum global pay-TV subscribers.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NFLX":"奈飞"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1105840721","content_text":"Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX) is scheduled to announce Q1 earnings results after market closes on Tuesday, April 19.Latest ResultsIn Q4 2021, Netflix added 8.28 million net new subscribers, a bit shy of the company's own forecast for 8.5 million net adds, and about in line with the Wall Street consensus forecast at 8.3 million. The company now has 221.8 million subscribers globally.The company generated Q4 revenue of $7.7 billion, up 16%, and in line with the company's projection at $7.7 billion. Profits were $1.33 cents a share, well ahead of analysts at 83 cents, with the outperformance mostly due to an unrealized gain tied to the company's euro denominated debt.Q1 GuidanceNetflix's projections for Q1 2022 were even lighter. The management's guidance is projecting 2.5 million net adds. While analysts on average predict 2.81 million in Q1, and 2.64 million in Q2, according to FactSet.It sees Q1 revenue of $7.9 billion, up 10.3%, but well shy of the Street consensus at $8.2 billion.3 Most Important Things to Watch1. Subscriber additionsAs always, an important focus for investors will be Netflix's net paid subscriber additions. In Q3, Netflix saw a re-acceleration in its quarterly subscriber growth, as net additions came in at 8.3 million. Though this was notably below the 8.5 million net new subscribers the company had estimated it would add during the quarter, it was still good to see a significant sequential uptick from the 4.4 million members the company added in the prior quarter.But what likely spooked investors was management's guidance for just 2.5 million net new paid subscribers inQ1 2022. This would be down significantly from the 4.0 million the company added inQ1 2021. This weak outlook, management explained, reflects the quarter's back-end weighted content slate.2. Commentary on competitionAnother red flag for Netflix investors in Q4 was management's nod to increasing competition. In a rare acknowledgment of competition having a negative impact on the company, management said, \"added competition may be affecting our marginal growth some...\"Investors should look to see if management doubles down on this worrisome narrative or if it brings positive data points to the table regarding how it is faring in a competitive environment. Chances are, the worrisome remarks about competition will continue. But investors should note that the stock's big decline has arguably priced in expectations for heated competition going forward.3. Subscriber-growth guidanceOf course, another key metric to watch will be the company's guidance for subscriber growth inQ2 2022. Technically, a back-weighted content slate in Q1 should positively impact Q2. Further, it's no secret that content production has been ramping back up from periods when much of the world was facing lockdowns. So lots of new content from Netflix should provide a catalyst for reaccelerated subscriber growth, assuming increasing competition isn't providing too much negative pressure.While it's always tough to estimate how many subscribers Netflix will guide for, it would be nice to see guidance for second-quarter subscriber levels on par with pre-COVID levels again. To do this, the company would need to guide for around 2.7 million new subscribers in Q2.Analyst OpinionsTruist analyst Matthew Thornton cut the price target of Netflix to $409 from $470.Thornton said in a research note that based on mobile app downloads, he believes the company's subscriber numbers in the first quarter will top expectations but thatQ2 outlook will come in below estimates, with consensus paid member adds being a \"slightly high hurdle,\" based on prior reports.Stifel analyst Scott Devittmaintained a“Buy” rating and a $460 price target on Netflix’s shares. Devitt noted the loss of subscribers in Russia and ongoing disruption in EMEA may limit the upside to subscriber growth. And looking past the first quarter, Devitt is tempering his estimates for 2022 and beyond as he takes a more conservative approach to the subscriber and ARPU growth on worsening macro conditions and continued uncertainty.JPMorgan analyst Doug Anmuth issued an “Overweight” rating and a $605 price target on Netflix’s shares. Anmuth was continuing to believe Netflix has meaningful room for further global subscriber penetration. And Anmuth believed Netflix is currently 29% penetrated among the approximately 776 million global broadband subscribers, 33% penetrated among the approximately 675 million current global pay-TV subscribers, and 31% penetrated among the approximately 712 million maximum global pay-TV subscribers.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":152,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9081536939,"gmtCreate":1650251102743,"gmtModify":1676534679476,"author":{"id":"3562758894473836","authorId":"3562758894473836","name":"Kaelyn","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3562758894473836","authorIdStr":"3562758894473836"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[smile]&nbsp;","listText":"[smile]&nbsp;","text":"[smile]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9081536939","repostId":"2227600101","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2227600101","pubTimestamp":1650248539,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2227600101?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-04-18 10:22","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Vs. Microsoft: Why We Like Apple Better","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2227600101","media":"seekingalpha","summary":"SummaryThe competition between Apple and Microsoft has shaped the evolution of personal computing.Th","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>Summary</b></p><ul><li>The competition between Apple and Microsoft has shaped the evolution of personal computing.</li><li>Their competition will continue in many core areas, but both are good candidates to play the world’s unstoppable shift toward a digital future.</li><li>This article provides an in-depth comparison so you can see why we like Apple better ourselves.</li><li>Our investing roadmap shows Apple provides a higher return potential with its better profitability, better R&amp;D yields, lower valuation, and consumer-centric devices.</li><li>And having a coherent investing roadmap keeps us clear headed, especially during challenging times like this.</li></ul><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0f5fd4c711942def6b79ac0bfdd04167\" tg-width=\"750\" tg-height=\"479\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images News</span></p><p><b>The investment thesis</b></p><p>The thesis of this article is really simple – under the current conditions, both Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) and Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT) provide far superior returns for long-term investors than the overall market. The key argument is built on the following chart. This chart also is the roadmap that we use in our Marketplace service to pick our tactical holdings. Having a coherent investing roadmap keeps us clear-headed, especially during challenging times like this.</p><p>You will see from the following chart, AAPL is projected to provide about 13% annual return (“ROI”) in the long term and MSFT about 10%, while the overall market is only about 6.5%. The main reasons are threefold:</p><ul><li>Their far superior ROCE (return on capital employed) over the market average, which gives it the ability to grow without the need for too much capital and subsequently can return most of the earnings to shareholders (either as dividends or share buybacks).</li><li>Their fundamental business models provide a stable moat and enjoy strong secular support.</li><li>Yet both of them sell at a similar valuation compared to the overall market.</li></ul><p>Then we will detail the reasons why we only own AAPL even though both are good candidates to play the world’s unstoppable shift toward a digital future. As you will see, the primary reason is that we like a concentrated portfolio and usually limit our exposure to one sector to one holding. And we choose AAPL because of its better profitability and its consumer-centric business model. We feel consumer stickiness, once established, is longer lasting and harder to change.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6f9fbd0e002bec5dc3e06183618e8562\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"432\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Source: author</span></p><p><b>How did we build our roadmap and how did it perform?</b></p><p>The key in building this road is to think like a business owner, not a stock trader. As detailed in our earlier article:</p><blockquote><ul><li><i>The long-term ROI for a business owner is simply determined by two things: A) the price paid to buy the business and B) the quality of the business. More specifically, part A is determined by the owner’s earning yield (“OEY”) when we purchased the business. And that is why PE is the first dimension in our roadmap. Part B is determined by the quality of the business and that is why ROCE, the most important metric for profitability, is the second dimension in our roadmap.</i></li><li><i>Now, the long-term growth rate is governed by ROCE and the Reinvestment Rate. These are the two most important growth engines, and they mutually enhance each other. High ROCE means every $1 reinvested can lead to a higher growth rate, which leads to more future profits and more flexible capital allocation to fuel further growth, and so on. So to summarize:</i></li><li><i>Longer-Term ROI = valuation + quality = OEY + Growth Rate = OEY + ROCE*Reinvestment Rate</i></li></ul></blockquote><p>The performance of our stocks picked using this road is recently updated in this article. Using the date I first published our portfolio on 5/31/2021 as the inception date, our picks have outperformed the S&amp;P 500 by about 11%.</p><p>With this background, the remainder of this article will show how the above roadmap applies to AAPL and MSFT.</p><p><b>APPL vs MSFT: the competitive landscape</b></p><p>AAPL and MSFT compete head-on in many of their core areas, ranging from operation systems, digital ad, mobile devices, PCs and laptops, et al. Besides their own competitions, they also face competition from all sides. No big tech companies stay in their own corner these days. For example, MSFT’s Bing search is in direct competition with Google. GOOG’s Chrome OS and Android OS now have become popular desktop operating systems in the world, directly and meaningfully competing with MSFT Windows and also Apple IOS.</p><p>But overall, they dominate the intersection of technology and consumer access. As such, both are protected by a formidable moat and well positioned to benefit from our world’s continued shifts toward digitalization. And the good news is that the pie is getting bigger itself as our appetite grows exponentially for data, automation, and entertainment.</p><p>Although we like AAPL better ourselves, we really do not see a bad choice here. Investors just need to pick the one that suits their own risk profile and fits in their own circle of competence.</p><p>For us, we understand AAPL’s consumer-centric business model better than MSFT’s enterprise-centric model. AAPL has mastered the interplay of freemium pricing and premium pricing strategy with billions of consumers. It can set substantially higher prices for its products (ranging from iPhone, MacBook, iPad, et al) than Microsoft and Android devices. As you will see immediately below, it has created a profitability category of its own kind.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/520b7911627c79cc9d82b83c715f8170\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"390\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Source: https://startuptalky.com/apple-vs-microsoft-marketing-strategy/</span></p><p><b>MSFT: more consistent and aggressive R&amp;D</b></p><p>First, we do not invest in a given tech stock because we have high confidence in a certain product that they are developing in the pipeline. Instead, we feel more comfortable betting on A) the recurring resources available to fund new R&amp;D efforts sustainably, and B) the overall efficiency of the R&amp;D <i>process</i>. So correspondingly, in the long run, I feel comfortable as long as a tech business can A) sustainably support new R&amp;D expenditures, and B) has demonstrated a consistent R&amp;D yield. I do not feel the need to particularly bet on any one of the new products to be a hit (or a complete failure).</p><p>So let’s first see how well and sustainably MSFT and AAPL can fund their new R&amp;D efforts. The short answer is: Extremely well. The next chart shows the R&amp;D expenses of MSFT and AAPL over the past decade. As seen, both have been consistently investing heavily in R&amp;D. A few observations:</p><ul><li>MSFT has been spending very consistently on R&amp;D, on average about 13% of its total revenue.</li><li>AAPL’s story is a bit more colorful. It did not spend that much on R&amp;D earlier in the decade. Partly because AAPL products were so disruptive at that time and enjoyed a quasi-monopoly status. Partly because Steve Jobs himself did not believe in R&amp;D spending. He commented that “Innovation has nothing to do with how many R&amp;D dollars you have. It&#39;s not about money.”</li><li>Then Tim Cook transitioned it to a different model. He more than doubled the R&amp;D expenses since he took over. The R&amp;D expenses are on average about 6.1% of sales now, still lower than other tech giants in relative terms. But in absolute terms, it&#39;s a mind-boggling amount (exceeding $20 billion in 2021).</li></ul><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7152ffd849f9eba247a9dc86052864b4\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"353\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Author</span></p><p>Then the next question is, how effective is the R&amp;D process? The short answer is again: Extremely effective. We ourselves like to use a variation of Buffett’s $1 test on R&amp;D expenses. We do not only listen to CEOs’ pitches on their brilliant new ideas that will shake the earth (again). We also examine the financials to see their words are corroborated by the numbers. And in MSFT and AAPL’s case, they are.</p><p>The purpose of any corporate R&amp;D is obviously to generate profit. Therefore, it&#39;s intuitive to quantify the yield by taking the ratio between profit and R&amp;D expenditures. This way we can quantify how many dollars of profit has been generated per dollar of R&amp;D expenses (i.e., the $1 test), as shown in the next chart. In this chart, I used the operating cash flow as the measure of profit. Also, most R&amp;D investments do not produce any results in the same year. They typically have a lifetime of a few years. Therefore, this analysis assumes a three-year average investment cycle for R&amp;D. And as a result, we use the three-year moving average of operating cash flow to represent this three-year cycle.</p><p>A few key observations:</p><ul><li>The R&amp;D yield for MSFT is again very consistent, boasting a long-term average of $2.8 of yield per $1 of R&amp;D expenditure. The consistency again shows the stable moat.</li><li>AAPL, as usual, has a more colorful story. As you can see, its R&amp;D yield has been more than $10 in 2013 under the tutelage of Steve Jobs. And it has declined to a range between $4.0 and $5.0 in recent years with an average of $4.3.</li><li>You might interpret the decline of AAPL’s R&amp;D yield as bad news. However, keep in mind that A) the level of profitability AAPL enjoyed in the early part of the decade is simply unsustainable, B) the decline is only relative to its own glorious past.</li><li>Overall, both AAPL and MSFT enjoy R&amp;D yields that are very competitive. To put things under perspective, for the overachieving FAAMG group, their average R&amp;D yield is “only” about $2.5.</li></ul><p>Then as we will next, both MSFT and AAPL enjoy superb profitability to fuel their R&amp;D efforts sustainably, which will lead to sustainable growth in turn.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7759bd87d22eab2200f1865c5436dc14\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"345\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Author</span></p><p><b>Both enjoy superb profitability but AAPL in its own category</b></p><p>When we think of long-term growth (like in 10 years or more), the framework I use is the following. In the long term, the growth rate is “simply” the product of ROCE and reinvestment rate, i.e.,</p><p><b>Long-Term Growth Rate = ROCE * Reinvestment Rate</b></p><p>ROCE stands for the return on capital employed and is the most important metric for measuring profitability. Note that ROCE is different from the return on equity (and more fundamental and important in my view). ROCE considers the return of capital ACTUALLY employed and therefore provides insight into how much additional capital a business needs to invest in order to earn a given extra amount of income – a key to estimating the long-term growth rate.</p><p>The detailed background ROCE has been detailed in my early articles and I will just directly quote the results below. In this analysis, I consider the following items capital actually employed A) Working capital (including payables, receivables, inventory), B) Gross Property, Plant, and Equipment, and C) Research and development expenses are also capitalized.</p><p>Based on the above considerations, the ROCE of MSFT and AAPL over the past decade is shown below. As seen,</p><ul><li>MSFT again is able to maintain a remarkably high ROCE and consistent level of ROCE: On average about 67% in recent years.</li><li>AAPL’s ROCE again has “declined” from an unsustainable level of 200% to 300% in the early years of the decade to the current level of around 150% in recent years.</li><li>But the keyword here is again <i>relative</i>. Their current level of ROCE may be higher or lower relative to each other or their own past. But any ROCE above 60% is remarkable. To put things under perspective, the overachievers in the FAAMG pack have an average ROCE of around 50% in recent years.</li></ul><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/595c877bbeb53f45b4d80d0d41b7ba50\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"330\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Author</span></p><p>In terms of reinvestment rate, both companies enjoy enviable capital allocation flexibility. The capital allocation picture is really simple for both companies here: Both earn a load of cash organically from their operations but do not need to spend much.</p><p>Given their high ROCE, it obviously makes total sense to reinvest as much of their earnings back into the business to fuel further growth as possible. But the problem is that for businesses at this scale, there are just not that many opportunities to reinvest the earnings. As a result, both have been allocating a large part of the remaining earnings to buy back shares. According to the current financials available on Seeking Alpha, as of TTM 2022, MSFT has been spending about 33% of the OPC on average on share repurchases, and AAPL even higher, about 77%.</p><p>All told, my estimates are that MSFT has been maintaining a reinvestment rate between 7.5% to 10% in recent years, and AAPL about 5% to 7.5%. And we will see the implications of the investment rates next.</p><p><b>Back to the roadmap</b></p><p>For AAPL, at its current price levels, the OEY is about ~3.8%. The growth rate is about 7.5% assuming a 7.5% reinvestment and a ROCE of 100% to be a bit conservative, resulting in a double-digit ROI already! For MSFT, the OEY is about ~3.3%. The growth rate is about 6.7% assuming a 10% reinvestment and a ROCE of 67%, resulting in about 10% ROI.</p><p>This is a key insight that we&#39;ve learned from Buffett – when you think like a business owner, you do not need a 10% growth rate to achieve a 10% return. We feel much more comfortable with a few percent of reliable and sustainable growth rate in stocks that we understand well.</p><p>The road map below shows the ROI based on an assumption of a 10% reinvestment rate, which is the average rate for the large and mature businesses in the S&amp;P 500 index. Admittedly, both MSFT&#39;s and AAPL’s reinvestment rate (especially APPL) is not as high as 10% currently. So the total ROI would be a bit lower than what is shown in the roadmap below. However, note that both boast strong cash generation capability and fortress balance sheet, which provide the optionality to crank up reinvestment rates or to boost growth through acquisitions.</p><p>In contrast, the overall market is currently valued at about 26.5x PE, resulting in an OEY of about 3.8%. however, the overall market’s ROCE is on the order of 20% or so. And with a 10% reinvestment rate, the growth rate would be about 2%, leading to a long-term ROI of about 6% per year.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6f9fbd0e002bec5dc3e06183618e8562\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"432\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Source: author</span></p><p><b>Risks</b></p><p>First and foremost, I do not see any structural risk associated with AAPL or MSFT at this moment. Remotely, there might be an antitrust regulatory risk. But even if it comes to that, I&#39;m not entirely certain if it will be bad for AAPL or MSFT investors for sure. If it really comes to that and the company has to be broken up, the market would be forced to value each of its business segments separately. And such a complete and transparent valuation may or may not result in a lower valuation.</p><p>There can be significant short-term volatility risks too. Regardless of AAPL and MSFT scale and business model, the valuation is at a high level and the overall market itself is also near a historical record valuation. There are several large macroeconomic and geopolitical uncertainties unfolding right now, including the pandemic, Ukraine conflicts, global logistic chain interruptions, and Fed’s interest rate decisions. Such a combination of high valuation and high volatility certainly could cause short terms risks – but are irrelevant for the long term.</p><p><b>Conclusion and final thought</b></p><p>When we invest like a business owner, not a stock trader, our long-term ROI is simply the sum of two things: A) the price paid to buy the business and B) the quality of the business. In both MSFT and AAPL’s case, they provide a far superior return for long-term investors than the overall market because of their far superior ROCE over the market average. Such high ROCE gives it the ability to grow without the need for too much capital and subsequently can return most of the earnings to shareholders (either as dividends or share buybacks).</p><p>The key takeaways are:</p><ul><li>Both dominate the intersection of technology and consumer access and both are protected by a formidable moat. They both provide favorable odds for double-digit returns in the long term.</li><li>As such, we really do not see a bad choice here. Investors just need to pick the one that suits their own risk profile and fits in their own circle of competence.</li><li>We like AAPL better ourselves mostly because we understand its consumer-centric business model better. We understand the roots of its superb profitability and consumer stickiness. After all and above all, having a coherent investing roadmap and staying within one’s circle of competence is the key to investing.</li></ul></body></html>","source":"seekingalpha","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Vs. Microsoft: Why We Like Apple Better</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Vs. Microsoft: Why We Like Apple Better\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-04-18 10:22 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4501666-apple-vs-microsoft-why-we-like-apple-better><strong>seekingalpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>SummaryThe competition between Apple and Microsoft has shaped the evolution of personal computing.Their competition will continue in many core areas, but both are good candidates to play the world’s ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4501666-apple-vs-microsoft-why-we-like-apple-better\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BK4581":"高盛持仓","BK4504":"桥水持仓","BK4512":"苹果概念","BK4548":"巴美列捷福持仓","BK4170":"电脑硬件、储存设备及电脑周边","BK4528":"SaaS概念","BK4516":"特朗普概念","BK4515":"5G概念","BK4532":"文艺复兴科技持仓","BK4554":"元宇宙及AR概念","MSFT":"微软","BK4553":"喜马拉雅资本持仓","AAPL":"苹果","BK4571":"数字音乐概念","BK4567":"ESG概念","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","BK4507":"流媒体概念","BK4576":"AR","BK4533":"AQR资本管理(全球第二大对冲基金)","BK4575":"芯片概念","BK4566":"资本集团","BK4525":"远程办公概念","BK4535":"淡马锡持仓","BK4577":"网络游戏","BK4501":"段永平概念","BK4538":"云计算","BK4527":"明星科技股","BK4559":"巴菲特持仓","BK4579":"人工智能","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓","BK4097":"系统软件","BK4503":"景林资产持仓","BK4574":"无人驾驶","BK4573":"虚拟现实","BK4505":"高瓴资本持仓"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4501666-apple-vs-microsoft-why-we-like-apple-better","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5a36db9d73b4222bc376d24ccc48c8a4","article_id":"2227600101","content_text":"SummaryThe competition between Apple and Microsoft has shaped the evolution of personal computing.Their competition will continue in many core areas, but both are good candidates to play the world’s unstoppable shift toward a digital future.This article provides an in-depth comparison so you can see why we like Apple better ourselves.Our investing roadmap shows Apple provides a higher return potential with its better profitability, better R&D yields, lower valuation, and consumer-centric devices.And having a coherent investing roadmap keeps us clear headed, especially during challenging times like this.Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images NewsThe investment thesisThe thesis of this article is really simple – under the current conditions, both Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) and Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT) provide far superior returns for long-term investors than the overall market. The key argument is built on the following chart. This chart also is the roadmap that we use in our Marketplace service to pick our tactical holdings. Having a coherent investing roadmap keeps us clear-headed, especially during challenging times like this.You will see from the following chart, AAPL is projected to provide about 13% annual return (“ROI”) in the long term and MSFT about 10%, while the overall market is only about 6.5%. The main reasons are threefold:Their far superior ROCE (return on capital employed) over the market average, which gives it the ability to grow without the need for too much capital and subsequently can return most of the earnings to shareholders (either as dividends or share buybacks).Their fundamental business models provide a stable moat and enjoy strong secular support.Yet both of them sell at a similar valuation compared to the overall market.Then we will detail the reasons why we only own AAPL even though both are good candidates to play the world’s unstoppable shift toward a digital future. As you will see, the primary reason is that we like a concentrated portfolio and usually limit our exposure to one sector to one holding. And we choose AAPL because of its better profitability and its consumer-centric business model. We feel consumer stickiness, once established, is longer lasting and harder to change.Source: authorHow did we build our roadmap and how did it perform?The key in building this road is to think like a business owner, not a stock trader. As detailed in our earlier article:The long-term ROI for a business owner is simply determined by two things: A) the price paid to buy the business and B) the quality of the business. More specifically, part A is determined by the owner’s earning yield (“OEY”) when we purchased the business. And that is why PE is the first dimension in our roadmap. Part B is determined by the quality of the business and that is why ROCE, the most important metric for profitability, is the second dimension in our roadmap.Now, the long-term growth rate is governed by ROCE and the Reinvestment Rate. These are the two most important growth engines, and they mutually enhance each other. High ROCE means every $1 reinvested can lead to a higher growth rate, which leads to more future profits and more flexible capital allocation to fuel further growth, and so on. So to summarize:Longer-Term ROI = valuation + quality = OEY + Growth Rate = OEY + ROCE*Reinvestment RateThe performance of our stocks picked using this road is recently updated in this article. Using the date I first published our portfolio on 5/31/2021 as the inception date, our picks have outperformed the S&P 500 by about 11%.With this background, the remainder of this article will show how the above roadmap applies to AAPL and MSFT.APPL vs MSFT: the competitive landscapeAAPL and MSFT compete head-on in many of their core areas, ranging from operation systems, digital ad, mobile devices, PCs and laptops, et al. Besides their own competitions, they also face competition from all sides. No big tech companies stay in their own corner these days. For example, MSFT’s Bing search is in direct competition with Google. GOOG’s Chrome OS and Android OS now have become popular desktop operating systems in the world, directly and meaningfully competing with MSFT Windows and also Apple IOS.But overall, they dominate the intersection of technology and consumer access. As such, both are protected by a formidable moat and well positioned to benefit from our world’s continued shifts toward digitalization. And the good news is that the pie is getting bigger itself as our appetite grows exponentially for data, automation, and entertainment.Although we like AAPL better ourselves, we really do not see a bad choice here. Investors just need to pick the one that suits their own risk profile and fits in their own circle of competence.For us, we understand AAPL’s consumer-centric business model better than MSFT’s enterprise-centric model. AAPL has mastered the interplay of freemium pricing and premium pricing strategy with billions of consumers. It can set substantially higher prices for its products (ranging from iPhone, MacBook, iPad, et al) than Microsoft and Android devices. As you will see immediately below, it has created a profitability category of its own kind.Source: https://startuptalky.com/apple-vs-microsoft-marketing-strategy/MSFT: more consistent and aggressive R&DFirst, we do not invest in a given tech stock because we have high confidence in a certain product that they are developing in the pipeline. Instead, we feel more comfortable betting on A) the recurring resources available to fund new R&D efforts sustainably, and B) the overall efficiency of the R&D process. So correspondingly, in the long run, I feel comfortable as long as a tech business can A) sustainably support new R&D expenditures, and B) has demonstrated a consistent R&D yield. I do not feel the need to particularly bet on any one of the new products to be a hit (or a complete failure).So let’s first see how well and sustainably MSFT and AAPL can fund their new R&D efforts. The short answer is: Extremely well. The next chart shows the R&D expenses of MSFT and AAPL over the past decade. As seen, both have been consistently investing heavily in R&D. A few observations:MSFT has been spending very consistently on R&D, on average about 13% of its total revenue.AAPL’s story is a bit more colorful. It did not spend that much on R&D earlier in the decade. Partly because AAPL products were so disruptive at that time and enjoyed a quasi-monopoly status. Partly because Steve Jobs himself did not believe in R&D spending. He commented that “Innovation has nothing to do with how many R&D dollars you have. It's not about money.”Then Tim Cook transitioned it to a different model. He more than doubled the R&D expenses since he took over. The R&D expenses are on average about 6.1% of sales now, still lower than other tech giants in relative terms. But in absolute terms, it's a mind-boggling amount (exceeding $20 billion in 2021).AuthorThen the next question is, how effective is the R&D process? The short answer is again: Extremely effective. We ourselves like to use a variation of Buffett’s $1 test on R&D expenses. We do not only listen to CEOs’ pitches on their brilliant new ideas that will shake the earth (again). We also examine the financials to see their words are corroborated by the numbers. And in MSFT and AAPL’s case, they are.The purpose of any corporate R&D is obviously to generate profit. Therefore, it's intuitive to quantify the yield by taking the ratio between profit and R&D expenditures. This way we can quantify how many dollars of profit has been generated per dollar of R&D expenses (i.e., the $1 test), as shown in the next chart. In this chart, I used the operating cash flow as the measure of profit. Also, most R&D investments do not produce any results in the same year. They typically have a lifetime of a few years. Therefore, this analysis assumes a three-year average investment cycle for R&D. And as a result, we use the three-year moving average of operating cash flow to represent this three-year cycle.A few key observations:The R&D yield for MSFT is again very consistent, boasting a long-term average of $2.8 of yield per $1 of R&D expenditure. The consistency again shows the stable moat.AAPL, as usual, has a more colorful story. As you can see, its R&D yield has been more than $10 in 2013 under the tutelage of Steve Jobs. And it has declined to a range between $4.0 and $5.0 in recent years with an average of $4.3.You might interpret the decline of AAPL’s R&D yield as bad news. However, keep in mind that A) the level of profitability AAPL enjoyed in the early part of the decade is simply unsustainable, B) the decline is only relative to its own glorious past.Overall, both AAPL and MSFT enjoy R&D yields that are very competitive. To put things under perspective, for the overachieving FAAMG group, their average R&D yield is “only” about $2.5.Then as we will next, both MSFT and AAPL enjoy superb profitability to fuel their R&D efforts sustainably, which will lead to sustainable growth in turn.AuthorBoth enjoy superb profitability but AAPL in its own categoryWhen we think of long-term growth (like in 10 years or more), the framework I use is the following. In the long term, the growth rate is “simply” the product of ROCE and reinvestment rate, i.e.,Long-Term Growth Rate = ROCE * Reinvestment RateROCE stands for the return on capital employed and is the most important metric for measuring profitability. Note that ROCE is different from the return on equity (and more fundamental and important in my view). ROCE considers the return of capital ACTUALLY employed and therefore provides insight into how much additional capital a business needs to invest in order to earn a given extra amount of income – a key to estimating the long-term growth rate.The detailed background ROCE has been detailed in my early articles and I will just directly quote the results below. In this analysis, I consider the following items capital actually employed A) Working capital (including payables, receivables, inventory), B) Gross Property, Plant, and Equipment, and C) Research and development expenses are also capitalized.Based on the above considerations, the ROCE of MSFT and AAPL over the past decade is shown below. As seen,MSFT again is able to maintain a remarkably high ROCE and consistent level of ROCE: On average about 67% in recent years.AAPL’s ROCE again has “declined” from an unsustainable level of 200% to 300% in the early years of the decade to the current level of around 150% in recent years.But the keyword here is again relative. Their current level of ROCE may be higher or lower relative to each other or their own past. But any ROCE above 60% is remarkable. To put things under perspective, the overachievers in the FAAMG pack have an average ROCE of around 50% in recent years.AuthorIn terms of reinvestment rate, both companies enjoy enviable capital allocation flexibility. The capital allocation picture is really simple for both companies here: Both earn a load of cash organically from their operations but do not need to spend much.Given their high ROCE, it obviously makes total sense to reinvest as much of their earnings back into the business to fuel further growth as possible. But the problem is that for businesses at this scale, there are just not that many opportunities to reinvest the earnings. As a result, both have been allocating a large part of the remaining earnings to buy back shares. According to the current financials available on Seeking Alpha, as of TTM 2022, MSFT has been spending about 33% of the OPC on average on share repurchases, and AAPL even higher, about 77%.All told, my estimates are that MSFT has been maintaining a reinvestment rate between 7.5% to 10% in recent years, and AAPL about 5% to 7.5%. And we will see the implications of the investment rates next.Back to the roadmapFor AAPL, at its current price levels, the OEY is about ~3.8%. The growth rate is about 7.5% assuming a 7.5% reinvestment and a ROCE of 100% to be a bit conservative, resulting in a double-digit ROI already! For MSFT, the OEY is about ~3.3%. The growth rate is about 6.7% assuming a 10% reinvestment and a ROCE of 67%, resulting in about 10% ROI.This is a key insight that we've learned from Buffett – when you think like a business owner, you do not need a 10% growth rate to achieve a 10% return. We feel much more comfortable with a few percent of reliable and sustainable growth rate in stocks that we understand well.The road map below shows the ROI based on an assumption of a 10% reinvestment rate, which is the average rate for the large and mature businesses in the S&P 500 index. Admittedly, both MSFT's and AAPL’s reinvestment rate (especially APPL) is not as high as 10% currently. So the total ROI would be a bit lower than what is shown in the roadmap below. However, note that both boast strong cash generation capability and fortress balance sheet, which provide the optionality to crank up reinvestment rates or to boost growth through acquisitions.In contrast, the overall market is currently valued at about 26.5x PE, resulting in an OEY of about 3.8%. however, the overall market’s ROCE is on the order of 20% or so. And with a 10% reinvestment rate, the growth rate would be about 2%, leading to a long-term ROI of about 6% per year.Source: authorRisksFirst and foremost, I do not see any structural risk associated with AAPL or MSFT at this moment. Remotely, there might be an antitrust regulatory risk. But even if it comes to that, I'm not entirely certain if it will be bad for AAPL or MSFT investors for sure. If it really comes to that and the company has to be broken up, the market would be forced to value each of its business segments separately. And such a complete and transparent valuation may or may not result in a lower valuation.There can be significant short-term volatility risks too. Regardless of AAPL and MSFT scale and business model, the valuation is at a high level and the overall market itself is also near a historical record valuation. There are several large macroeconomic and geopolitical uncertainties unfolding right now, including the pandemic, Ukraine conflicts, global logistic chain interruptions, and Fed’s interest rate decisions. Such a combination of high valuation and high volatility certainly could cause short terms risks – but are irrelevant for the long term.Conclusion and final thoughtWhen we invest like a business owner, not a stock trader, our long-term ROI is simply the sum of two things: A) the price paid to buy the business and B) the quality of the business. In both MSFT and AAPL’s case, they provide a far superior return for long-term investors than the overall market because of their far superior ROCE over the market average. Such high ROCE gives it the ability to grow without the need for too much capital and subsequently can return most of the earnings to shareholders (either as dividends or share buybacks).The key takeaways are:Both dominate the intersection of technology and consumer access and both are protected by a formidable moat. They both provide favorable odds for double-digit returns in the long term.As such, we really do not see a bad choice here. Investors just need to pick the one that suits their own risk profile and fits in their own circle of competence.We like AAPL better ourselves mostly because we understand its consumer-centric business model better. We understand the roots of its superb profitability and consumer stickiness. After all and above all, having a coherent investing roadmap and staying within one’s circle of competence is the key to investing.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":217,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9052378277,"gmtCreate":1655131666699,"gmtModify":1676535567342,"author":{"id":"3562758894473836","authorId":"3562758894473836","name":"Kaelyn","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3562758894473836","authorIdStr":"3562758894473836"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[smile]&nbsp;","listText":"[smile]&nbsp;","text":"[smile]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9052378277","repostId":"1138793205","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":154,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9060263571,"gmtCreate":1651155273818,"gmtModify":1676534860161,"author":{"id":"3562758894473836","authorId":"3562758894473836","name":"Kaelyn","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3562758894473836","authorIdStr":"3562758894473836"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[smile]&nbsp;","listText":"[smile]&nbsp;","text":"[smile]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9060263571","repostId":"2230454741","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2230454741","pubTimestamp":1651132673,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2230454741?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-04-28 15:57","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Palantir Technologies Stock: Bear vs. Bull","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2230454741","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"The data-mining firm is still a polarizing investment.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>Palantir Technologies&#39;</b> stock took investors on a wild ride after it went public via a direct listing on Sept. 30, 2020. The data-mining firm&#39;s shares started trading at $10, closed at an all-time high of $39 last January, but subsequently tumbled all the way back to about $12 a share.</p><p>Does that pullback represent a good buying opportunity for patient investors? Let&#39;s review the bull and bear cases to decide.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5a745be90180fb00049b4e1dd3a5ed89\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"393\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>Image source: Getty Images.</span></p><h2>What does Palantir do?</h2><p>Palantir operates two main software platforms: Gotham, which serves government clients; and Foundry, which serves large enterprises and private organizations. A third platform, Apollo, provides automatic software updates for both platforms as a cloud-based service.</p><p>Palantir&#39;s software aggregates data from disparate sources and then analyzes it with artificial intelligence algorithms to help organizations make informed decisions. For example, the U.S. Army uses Gotham to collect intel from various government agencies and local sources to plan missions. Large companies can also use its algorithms to streamline their operations.</p><h2>Why do the bulls love Palantir?</h2><p>The bulls love Palantir because it has firm ties to the U.S. government, it generates robust growth, and its gross margins are expanding.</p><p>Palantir&#39;s revenue rose 47% in 2020, then grew 41% to $1.54 billion in 2021. It ended 2021 with a high dollar-based net retention rate of 131%, and it expects its revenue to grow by at least 30% annually through 2025.</p><p>Its government revenue in 2021 rose 34% to $645 million, but it still decelerated from its 77% growth in 2020. However, its commercial revenue in 2021 increased 47% to $897 million, which accelerated from its 22% growth in 2020.</p><p>The acceleration of its commercial business silenced the bears who initially claimed Palantir would struggle against similar data-mining companies like <b>C3.ai</b>, <b>Alteryx</b>, and <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CRM\">Salesforce</a></b> in the crowded enterprise analytics market.</p><p>The bulls also believe its government slowdown is temporary since it still secured plenty of new deals over the past year. In addition, Ukraine war could generate fresh tailwinds for Gotham as more government agencies upgrade their analytics systems to counter the threat of new cyberattacks and military aggression across Europe.</p><p>Palantir&#39;s adjusted gross margin rose from 71% in 2019 to 81% in 2020, then increased to 82% in 2021. That ongoing expansion indicates it still has plenty of pricing power in the data mining and analytics market.</p><h2>Why do the bears hate Palantir?</h2><p>The bears dislike Palantir because it faces a hidden competitor within the U.S. government, it&#39;s unprofitable, and its stock still isn&#39;t cheap.</p><p>Palantir has a controversial reputation because its co-founder Peter Thiel was a vocal supporter of former President Donald Trump. Immigration and Customs Enforcement&#39;s (ICE) usage of Gotham to deport undocumented immigrants also sparked internal protests and resignations across the company.</p><p>Those controversies, along with long-term cost concerns, have reportedly driven ICE to develop its own internal replacement for Gotham called RAVEn. If other U.S. government agencies follow ICE&#39;s lead, Palantir&#39;s dream of becoming the &#34;default operating system for data across the U.S. government&#34; (which it boldly set in its S-1 filing) could quickly end.</p><p>Palantir&#39;s net loss widened from $580 million in 2019 to $1.17 billion in 2020, partly due to the costs of its direct listing, and narrowed to $520 million in 2021. That red ink makes Palantir a risky stock to own as interest rates rise.</p><p>Palantir&#39;s stock has nearly taken a round trip back to its initial opening price, but it still isn&#39;t undervalued at 12 times this year&#39;s sales. By comparison, <b>Twilio </b>(TWLO -6.26%) -- the cloud-based communications company which expects to generate at least 30% organic revenue growth over the next few years -- trades at just six times this year&#39;s sales.</p><p>To make matter worse, Palantir continues to dilute its shares with its generous stock-based compensation (50% of its revenue in 2021) as its insiders cash out. On a weighted-average basis, Palantir&#39;s outstanding shares nearly doubled in 2021. Yet over the past three months, its insiders sold more than twice as many shares as they purchased.</p><h2>The bears still have the upper hand</h2><p>Palantir&#39;s business should continue to grow at an impressive clip this year, but its ongoing losses, dilution, and insider sales indicate its stock could still drop even further in this challenging market. Therefore, I believe investors should avoid Palantir until its price-to-sales ratio drops to the single digits.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Palantir Technologies Stock: Bear vs. Bull</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nPalantir Technologies Stock: Bear vs. Bull\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-04-28 15:57 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/04/27/palantir-technologies-stock-bear-vs-bull/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Palantir Technologies' stock took investors on a wild ride after it went public via a direct listing on Sept. 30, 2020. The data-mining firm's shares started trading at $10, closed at an all-time high...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/04/27/palantir-technologies-stock-bear-vs-bull/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"PLTR":"Palantir Technologies Inc."},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/04/27/palantir-technologies-stock-bear-vs-bull/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2230454741","content_text":"Palantir Technologies' stock took investors on a wild ride after it went public via a direct listing on Sept. 30, 2020. The data-mining firm's shares started trading at $10, closed at an all-time high of $39 last January, but subsequently tumbled all the way back to about $12 a share.Does that pullback represent a good buying opportunity for patient investors? Let's review the bull and bear cases to decide.Image source: Getty Images.What does Palantir do?Palantir operates two main software platforms: Gotham, which serves government clients; and Foundry, which serves large enterprises and private organizations. A third platform, Apollo, provides automatic software updates for both platforms as a cloud-based service.Palantir's software aggregates data from disparate sources and then analyzes it with artificial intelligence algorithms to help organizations make informed decisions. For example, the U.S. Army uses Gotham to collect intel from various government agencies and local sources to plan missions. Large companies can also use its algorithms to streamline their operations.Why do the bulls love Palantir?The bulls love Palantir because it has firm ties to the U.S. government, it generates robust growth, and its gross margins are expanding.Palantir's revenue rose 47% in 2020, then grew 41% to $1.54 billion in 2021. It ended 2021 with a high dollar-based net retention rate of 131%, and it expects its revenue to grow by at least 30% annually through 2025.Its government revenue in 2021 rose 34% to $645 million, but it still decelerated from its 77% growth in 2020. However, its commercial revenue in 2021 increased 47% to $897 million, which accelerated from its 22% growth in 2020.The acceleration of its commercial business silenced the bears who initially claimed Palantir would struggle against similar data-mining companies like C3.ai, Alteryx, and Salesforce in the crowded enterprise analytics market.The bulls also believe its government slowdown is temporary since it still secured plenty of new deals over the past year. In addition, Ukraine war could generate fresh tailwinds for Gotham as more government agencies upgrade their analytics systems to counter the threat of new cyberattacks and military aggression across Europe.Palantir's adjusted gross margin rose from 71% in 2019 to 81% in 2020, then increased to 82% in 2021. That ongoing expansion indicates it still has plenty of pricing power in the data mining and analytics market.Why do the bears hate Palantir?The bears dislike Palantir because it faces a hidden competitor within the U.S. government, it's unprofitable, and its stock still isn't cheap.Palantir has a controversial reputation because its co-founder Peter Thiel was a vocal supporter of former President Donald Trump. Immigration and Customs Enforcement's (ICE) usage of Gotham to deport undocumented immigrants also sparked internal protests and resignations across the company.Those controversies, along with long-term cost concerns, have reportedly driven ICE to develop its own internal replacement for Gotham called RAVEn. If other U.S. government agencies follow ICE's lead, Palantir's dream of becoming the \"default operating system for data across the U.S. government\" (which it boldly set in its S-1 filing) could quickly end.Palantir's net loss widened from $580 million in 2019 to $1.17 billion in 2020, partly due to the costs of its direct listing, and narrowed to $520 million in 2021. That red ink makes Palantir a risky stock to own as interest rates rise.Palantir's stock has nearly taken a round trip back to its initial opening price, but it still isn't undervalued at 12 times this year's sales. By comparison, Twilio (TWLO -6.26%) -- the cloud-based communications company which expects to generate at least 30% organic revenue growth over the next few years -- trades at just six times this year's sales.To make matter worse, Palantir continues to dilute its shares with its generous stock-based compensation (50% of its revenue in 2021) as its insiders cash out. On a weighted-average basis, Palantir's outstanding shares nearly doubled in 2021. Yet over the past three months, its insiders sold more than twice as many shares as they purchased.The bears still have the upper handPalantir's business should continue to grow at an impressive clip this year, but its ongoing losses, dilution, and insider sales indicate its stock could still drop even further in this challenging market. Therefore, I believe investors should avoid Palantir until its price-to-sales ratio drops to the single digits.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":269,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9058088986,"gmtCreate":1654753204345,"gmtModify":1676535505289,"author":{"id":"3562758894473836","authorId":"3562758894473836","name":"Kaelyn","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3562758894473836","authorIdStr":"3562758894473836"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[smile]&nbsp;","listText":"[smile]&nbsp;","text":"[smile]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9058088986","repostId":"1188644119","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":325,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9022296843,"gmtCreate":1653528418082,"gmtModify":1676535299008,"author":{"id":"3562758894473836","authorId":"3562758894473836","name":"Kaelyn","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3562758894473836","authorIdStr":"3562758894473836"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[smile]&nbsp;","listText":"[smile]&nbsp;","text":"[smile]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9022296843","repostId":"1115378536","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1115378536","pubTimestamp":1653527702,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1115378536?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-05-26 09:15","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Tesla Files Plans for Diner/Drive-in Theater Supercharger in Hollywood","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1115378536","media":"electrek","summary":"Tesla has reportedly filed plans for a 29-stall supercharger and diner/drive-in theater location in ","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Tesla has reportedly filed plans for a 29-stall supercharger and diner/drive-in theater location in Hollywood, Los Angeles, California. The location is at 7001 Santa Monica Boulevard at the intersection of Orange Drive.</p><p>Tesla originally planned to build the diner in the coastal city of Santa Monica but then moved the plans to Hollywood. Now, perhaps a little confusingly to out-of-towners, we’ve learned the diner will still be in Hollywood – but on Santa Monica Boulevard, one of the main streets in town and along historic Route 66.</p><p>The old site in Santa Monica does have a supercharger that opened in February, though that supercharger is no longer getting a diner.</p><p>The new location is currently occupied by a Shakey’s Pizza Parlor, which seems to still be operational. The plans would involve demolishing the Shakey’s and building a new two-story diner in its place. The property already has a large parking lot, though the lot would need remodeling to add superchargers.</p><p>The bottom floor will consist of the kitchen, a bar with stool seating, several booths, and an outdoor bar around the edge of the building. The top floor will have outdoor rooftop seating with a bar, several tables, two rows of a theater-style seating area, and a standing bar behind the theater seats. The bottom floor will also have a “carhop area” for waitstaff to bring meal orders out to cars in the parking lot.</p><p>The theater-style seating will look out on a parking lot with 29 supercharger stalls and 34 total spots – the last five will have level two chargers for lower-speed charging. The parking lot will have two screens visible to the rooftop area and to the cars in the parking lot.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2bacf2541a18d61c5c37dd9038eb465d\" tg-width=\"1857\" tg-height=\"1321\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>The theater will show short features, around 30 minutes long, meant to last as long as a standard meal/charging session might last.</p><p>It’s hard to tell from these drawings what aesthetic the diner will fit. Originally, it was billed as an “old-school” diner, but the addition of bamboo landscape screens surrounding the property on the north and west sides seem to diverge from that aesthetic. Tesla may now be targeting a “futuristic” aesthetic, rather than the original “old-school” one, and these drawings look like they could go either way.</p><p>Tesla is asking the city to allow the site to be operational 24 hours a day – including the restaurant. The theater may not operate all night long, though, as Tesla hasn’t asked for the city to change restrictions on theater operation. We don’t know if this means the restaurant will definitely be open 24 hours, but Tesla at least wants the permit to be able to stay open that long.</p><p>Tesla hasfiled for permits beforefor this project when it was in the City of Santa Monica, so plans could change again, especially if the city comes back and says that this project has deficiencies. The parking lot, in particular, does seem to have a few oddly-shaped spots, so we’ll see if the city has some issues with that.</p><p>What do you think about the new plans? Let us know in the comments below.</p></body></html>","source":"lsy1653527777185","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Tesla Files Plans for Diner/Drive-in Theater Supercharger in Hollywood</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTesla Files Plans for Diner/Drive-in Theater Supercharger in Hollywood\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-05-26 09:15 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://electrek.co/2022/05/21/tesla-files-plans-for-diner-drive-in-theater-supercharger-on-santa-monica-blvd-in-hollywood/><strong>electrek</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Tesla has reportedly filed plans for a 29-stall supercharger and diner/drive-in theater location in Hollywood, Los Angeles, California. The location is at 7001 Santa Monica Boulevard at the ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://electrek.co/2022/05/21/tesla-files-plans-for-diner-drive-in-theater-supercharger-on-santa-monica-blvd-in-hollywood/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"https://electrek.co/2022/05/21/tesla-files-plans-for-diner-drive-in-theater-supercharger-on-santa-monica-blvd-in-hollywood/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1115378536","content_text":"Tesla has reportedly filed plans for a 29-stall supercharger and diner/drive-in theater location in Hollywood, Los Angeles, California. The location is at 7001 Santa Monica Boulevard at the intersection of Orange Drive.Tesla originally planned to build the diner in the coastal city of Santa Monica but then moved the plans to Hollywood. Now, perhaps a little confusingly to out-of-towners, we’ve learned the diner will still be in Hollywood – but on Santa Monica Boulevard, one of the main streets in town and along historic Route 66.The old site in Santa Monica does have a supercharger that opened in February, though that supercharger is no longer getting a diner.The new location is currently occupied by a Shakey’s Pizza Parlor, which seems to still be operational. The plans would involve demolishing the Shakey’s and building a new two-story diner in its place. The property already has a large parking lot, though the lot would need remodeling to add superchargers.The bottom floor will consist of the kitchen, a bar with stool seating, several booths, and an outdoor bar around the edge of the building. The top floor will have outdoor rooftop seating with a bar, several tables, two rows of a theater-style seating area, and a standing bar behind the theater seats. The bottom floor will also have a “carhop area” for waitstaff to bring meal orders out to cars in the parking lot.The theater-style seating will look out on a parking lot with 29 supercharger stalls and 34 total spots – the last five will have level two chargers for lower-speed charging. The parking lot will have two screens visible to the rooftop area and to the cars in the parking lot.The theater will show short features, around 30 minutes long, meant to last as long as a standard meal/charging session might last.It’s hard to tell from these drawings what aesthetic the diner will fit. Originally, it was billed as an “old-school” diner, but the addition of bamboo landscape screens surrounding the property on the north and west sides seem to diverge from that aesthetic. Tesla may now be targeting a “futuristic” aesthetic, rather than the original “old-school” one, and these drawings look like they could go either way.Tesla is asking the city to allow the site to be operational 24 hours a day – including the restaurant. The theater may not operate all night long, though, as Tesla hasn’t asked for the city to change restrictions on theater operation. We don’t know if this means the restaurant will definitely be open 24 hours, but Tesla at least wants the permit to be able to stay open that long.Tesla hasfiled for permits beforefor this project when it was in the City of Santa Monica, so plans could change again, especially if the city comes back and says that this project has deficiencies. The parking lot, in particular, does seem to have a few oddly-shaped spots, so we’ll see if the city has some issues with that.What do you think about the new plans? Let us know in the comments below.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":244,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9081538244,"gmtCreate":1650251072826,"gmtModify":1676534679468,"author":{"id":"3562758894473836","authorId":"3562758894473836","name":"Kaelyn","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3562758894473836","authorIdStr":"3562758894473836"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[smile]&nbsp;","listText":"[smile]&nbsp;","text":"[smile]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9081538244","repostId":"1196117569","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1196117569","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1650244560,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1196117569?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-04-18 09:16","market":"sg","language":"en","title":"Singapore Stocks to watch: Rex, HRNetGroup, Oxley, Elite Commercial Reit, HPL, SPH Reit","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1196117569","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"THE following companies saw new developments that may affect trading of their securities on Monday (","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>THE following companies saw new developments that may affect trading of their securities on Monday (Apr 18):</p><h2><b>Rex: </b></h2><p>Rex International Holding’s 91.65%-owned subsidiary, Lime Petroleum AS, has signed an agreement with MOL Norge AS to acquire the latter’s 40% interests in licences PL820 S and PL 820 SB in the North Sea on April 14.</p><p>The licenses come with the Iving and Evra discoveries and are located in the Utsira High area. The area is adjacent to the giant Vår Energy-operated Balder field, and just north of PL818 Orkja and PL867 Gjegnalunden in which Lime has 30% and 20% interests respectively.</p><h2><b>HRNetGroup:</b> </h2><p>Recruitment company HRnetGroup said its lead independent non-executive director Sin Boon Ann would be retiring on Apr 28 to allow for a renewal of the board.</p><p>Sin, who was chairman of the group’s nominating committee, will also cease to be a member of its audit and remuneration committees after his retirement, the company said on Monday (Apr 18).</p><h2><b>Oxley:</b> </h2><p>Property developer Oxley Holdings has issued S$50 million worth of notes with a fixed interest rate of 6.9 per cent that are due in July 2024.</p><p>These notes are its third tranche in a series, issued under a US$1 billion guaranteed euro medium term note programme, said the company in a bourse filing on Tuesday (Apr 5) evening.</p><p>This third tranche is to be consolidated to form a single series with the first and second tranche, both of which were issued last year, under the same programme.</p><h2><b>Elite Commercial Reit:</b> </h2><p>ELITE Commercial Reit said its lease for Tomlinson House in Blackpool Norcross Lane to the United Kingdom&#39;s Ministry of Defence will now run till March 2028, after the option for lease break in March 2023 had been removed.</p><p>In its regulatory filing on Thursday (Apr 14), the manager of the real estate investment trust (Reit) said the move has provided income visibility for the next 6 years from March 2022, as well as further upside from its built-in inflation-linked rental escalation from April 2023.</p><p>Elite Commercial Reit, under an agreement with the UK Ministry of Defence, will be investing £100,000 (S$177,880) towards pre-approved works relating to sustainability upgrade initiatives focused on improving the underlying energy efficiency of the building.</p><h2>HPL:</h2><p>Hotel Properties (HPL) will be booking a gain of $29 million with the sale of its 80% stake in a joint venture.</p><p>Ong Beng Seng, HPL’s managing director, holds the other 20% of the joint venture.</p><p>The joint venture HPL Olympia, holds the 405-key Hilton London Olympia hotel in London.</p><p>The property is to be sold to an unrelated party for £40.8 million in cash and the transacted price was negotiated at arm’s length on a “willing buyer and willing seller” basis.</p><h2>SPH Reit:</h2><p>With its offer to acquire Singapore Press Holdings (SPH) having been approved by shareholders of the mainboard-listed property player, Cuscaden Peak has started dispatching to shareholders the forms for them to choose between getting all cash or a combination of cash and SPH Reit units.</p><p>In its regulatory filing furnished to the Singapore Exchange on Thursday (April 14), Hotel Properties Limited (HPL) announced that the consortium it backed, Cuscaden Peak, requires SPH shareholders to submit the election forms by 5.30pm on April 26 if they want to receive the $2.36 in cash for each SPH share they hold.</p><p>Shareholders, however, need not state their preference if they want to receive a combination of $1.602 cash and 0.782 SPH Reit unit for every SPH share.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Singapore Stocks to watch: Rex, HRNetGroup, Oxley, Elite Commercial Reit, HPL, SPH Reit</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSingapore Stocks to watch: Rex, HRNetGroup, Oxley, Elite Commercial Reit, HPL, SPH Reit\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-04-18 09:16</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>THE following companies saw new developments that may affect trading of their securities on Monday (Apr 18):</p><h2><b>Rex: </b></h2><p>Rex International Holding’s 91.65%-owned subsidiary, Lime Petroleum AS, has signed an agreement with MOL Norge AS to acquire the latter’s 40% interests in licences PL820 S and PL 820 SB in the North Sea on April 14.</p><p>The licenses come with the Iving and Evra discoveries and are located in the Utsira High area. The area is adjacent to the giant Vår Energy-operated Balder field, and just north of PL818 Orkja and PL867 Gjegnalunden in which Lime has 30% and 20% interests respectively.</p><h2><b>HRNetGroup:</b> </h2><p>Recruitment company HRnetGroup said its lead independent non-executive director Sin Boon Ann would be retiring on Apr 28 to allow for a renewal of the board.</p><p>Sin, who was chairman of the group’s nominating committee, will also cease to be a member of its audit and remuneration committees after his retirement, the company said on Monday (Apr 18).</p><h2><b>Oxley:</b> </h2><p>Property developer Oxley Holdings has issued S$50 million worth of notes with a fixed interest rate of 6.9 per cent that are due in July 2024.</p><p>These notes are its third tranche in a series, issued under a US$1 billion guaranteed euro medium term note programme, said the company in a bourse filing on Tuesday (Apr 5) evening.</p><p>This third tranche is to be consolidated to form a single series with the first and second tranche, both of which were issued last year, under the same programme.</p><h2><b>Elite Commercial Reit:</b> </h2><p>ELITE Commercial Reit said its lease for Tomlinson House in Blackpool Norcross Lane to the United Kingdom&#39;s Ministry of Defence will now run till March 2028, after the option for lease break in March 2023 had been removed.</p><p>In its regulatory filing on Thursday (Apr 14), the manager of the real estate investment trust (Reit) said the move has provided income visibility for the next 6 years from March 2022, as well as further upside from its built-in inflation-linked rental escalation from April 2023.</p><p>Elite Commercial Reit, under an agreement with the UK Ministry of Defence, will be investing £100,000 (S$177,880) towards pre-approved works relating to sustainability upgrade initiatives focused on improving the underlying energy efficiency of the building.</p><h2>HPL:</h2><p>Hotel Properties (HPL) will be booking a gain of $29 million with the sale of its 80% stake in a joint venture.</p><p>Ong Beng Seng, HPL’s managing director, holds the other 20% of the joint venture.</p><p>The joint venture HPL Olympia, holds the 405-key Hilton London Olympia hotel in London.</p><p>The property is to be sold to an unrelated party for £40.8 million in cash and the transacted price was negotiated at arm’s length on a “willing buyer and willing seller” basis.</p><h2>SPH Reit:</h2><p>With its offer to acquire Singapore Press Holdings (SPH) having been approved by shareholders of the mainboard-listed property player, Cuscaden Peak has started dispatching to shareholders the forms for them to choose between getting all cash or a combination of cash and SPH Reit units.</p><p>In its regulatory filing furnished to the Singapore Exchange on Thursday (April 14), Hotel Properties Limited (HPL) announced that the consortium it backed, Cuscaden Peak, requires SPH shareholders to submit the election forms by 5.30pm on April 26 if they want to receive the $2.36 in cash for each SPH share they hold.</p><p>Shareholders, however, need not state their preference if they want to receive a combination of $1.602 cash and 0.782 SPH Reit unit for every SPH share.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"5WH.SI":"REX国际","MXNU.SI":"EliteComREIT GBP","CHZ.SI":"和乐集团有限公司","SK6U.SI":"百利宫房地产投资信托","5UX.SI":"豪利"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1196117569","content_text":"THE following companies saw new developments that may affect trading of their securities on Monday (Apr 18):Rex: Rex International Holding’s 91.65%-owned subsidiary, Lime Petroleum AS, has signed an agreement with MOL Norge AS to acquire the latter’s 40% interests in licences PL820 S and PL 820 SB in the North Sea on April 14.The licenses come with the Iving and Evra discoveries and are located in the Utsira High area. The area is adjacent to the giant Vår Energy-operated Balder field, and just north of PL818 Orkja and PL867 Gjegnalunden in which Lime has 30% and 20% interests respectively.HRNetGroup: Recruitment company HRnetGroup said its lead independent non-executive director Sin Boon Ann would be retiring on Apr 28 to allow for a renewal of the board.Sin, who was chairman of the group’s nominating committee, will also cease to be a member of its audit and remuneration committees after his retirement, the company said on Monday (Apr 18).Oxley: Property developer Oxley Holdings has issued S$50 million worth of notes with a fixed interest rate of 6.9 per cent that are due in July 2024.These notes are its third tranche in a series, issued under a US$1 billion guaranteed euro medium term note programme, said the company in a bourse filing on Tuesday (Apr 5) evening.This third tranche is to be consolidated to form a single series with the first and second tranche, both of which were issued last year, under the same programme.Elite Commercial Reit: ELITE Commercial Reit said its lease for Tomlinson House in Blackpool Norcross Lane to the United Kingdom's Ministry of Defence will now run till March 2028, after the option for lease break in March 2023 had been removed.In its regulatory filing on Thursday (Apr 14), the manager of the real estate investment trust (Reit) said the move has provided income visibility for the next 6 years from March 2022, as well as further upside from its built-in inflation-linked rental escalation from April 2023.Elite Commercial Reit, under an agreement with the UK Ministry of Defence, will be investing £100,000 (S$177,880) towards pre-approved works relating to sustainability upgrade initiatives focused on improving the underlying energy efficiency of the building.HPL:Hotel Properties (HPL) will be booking a gain of $29 million with the sale of its 80% stake in a joint venture.Ong Beng Seng, HPL’s managing director, holds the other 20% of the joint venture.The joint venture HPL Olympia, holds the 405-key Hilton London Olympia hotel in London.The property is to be sold to an unrelated party for £40.8 million in cash and the transacted price was negotiated at arm’s length on a “willing buyer and willing seller” basis.SPH Reit:With its offer to acquire Singapore Press Holdings (SPH) having been approved by shareholders of the mainboard-listed property player, Cuscaden Peak has started dispatching to shareholders the forms for them to choose between getting all cash or a combination of cash and SPH Reit units.In its regulatory filing furnished to the Singapore Exchange on Thursday (April 14), Hotel Properties Limited (HPL) announced that the consortium it backed, Cuscaden Peak, requires SPH shareholders to submit the election forms by 5.30pm on April 26 if they want to receive the $2.36 in cash for each SPH share they hold.Shareholders, however, need not state their preference if they want to receive a combination of $1.602 cash and 0.782 SPH Reit unit for every SPH share.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":124,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9089785358,"gmtCreate":1650034396546,"gmtModify":1676534633350,"author":{"id":"3562758894473836","authorId":"3562758894473836","name":"Kaelyn","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3562758894473836","authorIdStr":"3562758894473836"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[Like]&nbsp;","listText":"[Like]&nbsp;","text":"[Like]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9089785358","repostId":"2227293602","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2227293602","pubTimestamp":1650031124,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2227293602?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-04-15 21:58","market":"us","language":"en","title":"The Best Stocks to Invest $1,000 in Right Now","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2227293602","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"These stocks won't make you rich overnight, but they are long-term compounding machines.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>If I was looking to allocate $1,000 in stocks today, I would concentrate on industry leaders and beloved brands that still have bright futures. I believe <b>Amazon</b> ( AMZN -2.46% ) and <b>Apple</b> ( AAPL -3.00% ) are still two very attractive investments to hold until retirement.</p><p>These stocks have made investors massive returns over the last 10 years, and it&#39;s no secret why. They provide products and services used by billions of people, and their techy nature and massive revenue streams enable them to manufacture growth by continuing to delight their customers with innovation. After reviewing what these companies are up to (see below), consider investing $1,000 in the <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> stock you like best, or splitting the total and putting $500 into each if you can&#39;t decide.</p><p><img src=\"https://g.foolcdn.com/image/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fg.foolcdn.com%2Feditorial%2Fimages%2F674731%2Finvesting-personal-finance.jpg&amp;w=700&amp;op=resize\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"467\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>Image source: Getty Images.</p><h2>Amazon</h2><p>Amazon&#39;s stock price is down 8.5% over the last year, which trails the 7.4% positive return of the broader market as measured by the <b>S&amp;P 500</b> index. But it&#39;s only a matter of time before Amazon takes off again. While revenue is not growing as fast as it was in 2020, revenue was still up 57% in the fourth quarter of 2021 over the same quarter in 2019.</p><p>Amazon doesn&#39;t innovate in the same way a product manufacturer like Apple does. Instead, Amazon&#39;s innovation is through faster delivery speeds, which is crucial to staying ahead of competitors. This is why Amazon was able to accelerate revenue during the pandemic. It doubled its fulfillment capacity over the last two years, which is not easy for a company that generated $470 billion in revenue last year.</p><p>Market participants are focused on near-term headwinds, such as a tight labor market, higher labor costs, and inflationary pressures on Amazon&#39;s bottom line. In the fourth quarter, higher costs to deal with these issues cut Amazon&#39;s operating profit in half compared to the year-ago quarter. But CEO Andy Jessy is not only optimistic about where the business is headed. He suggested in Amazon&#39;s 2021 annual report that there are still new areas of growth that Amazon hasn&#39;t even penetrated yet:</p><blockquote>Amazon is a big company with some large businesses, but it&#39;s still early days for us. We will continue to be insurgent -- inventing in businesses that we&#39;re in, in new businesses that we&#39;ve yet to launch, and in new ideas that we haven&#39;t even imagined yet. It remains Day 1.</blockquote><p>Amazon has been a great growth stock to own over the last few decades. A $1,000 investment in Amazon in 2012 would be worth over $16,000 today. It may not return the same amount over the next decade, but Amazon&#39;s investments in expanding fulfillment capacity spell more revenue growth ahead. You can&#39;t go wrong holding this top growth stock for the long haul.</p><h2>Apple</h2><p>Apple is launching its budget-friendly iPhone SE at the right time. Last quarter, Apple reported record product revenue of $104 billion following last fall&#39;s launch of the new iPhone 13. This performance was impressive given the supply chain constraints that have made sourcing components difficult in the semiconductor industry over the last year.</p><p>Growth in Apple&#39;s installed base of devices is fueling record revenue in services, which hit $19 billion, up 24% year over year. Higher demand for apps and subscriptions is also driving higher margins, and Apple may not be done stacking its service lineup with ways to add more recurring revenue in the business.</p><p>Bloomberg recently reported that Apple may be planning to offer a subscription plan for customers to buy hardware devices. This could further accelerate the adoption of iPhones, making them more affordable for the masses.</p><p>Apple&#39;s stock price more than tripled over the last three years. Its higher valuation might keep it from delivering similar returns over the next few years, but demand for iPhones is great news for the long-term growth in the lucrative services business. Analysts expect Apple to generate 10% annualized growth in earnings per share over the next five years, and that&#39;s probably a reasonable estimate of what kind of returns investors can expect.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>The Best Stocks to Invest $1,000 in Right Now</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nThe Best Stocks to Invest $1,000 in Right Now\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-04-15 21:58 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/04/15/the-best-stocks-to-invest-1000-in-right-now/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>If I was looking to allocate $1,000 in stocks today, I would concentrate on industry leaders and beloved brands that still have bright futures. I believe Amazon ( AMZN -2.46% ) and Apple ( AAPL -3.00%...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/04/15/the-best-stocks-to-invest-1000-in-right-now/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BK4581":"高盛持仓","BK4512":"苹果概念","BK4548":"巴美列捷福持仓","BK4170":"电脑硬件、储存设备及电脑周边","BK4515":"5G概念","BK4532":"文艺复兴科技持仓","BK4554":"元宇宙及AR概念","BK4553":"喜马拉雅资本持仓","BK4571":"数字音乐概念","AAPL":"苹果","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","BK4507":"流媒体概念","BK4576":"AR","BK4533":"AQR资本管理(全球第二大对冲基金)","BK4575":"芯片概念","BK4566":"资本集团","BK4561":"索罗斯持仓","BK4535":"淡马锡持仓","BK4524":"宅经济概念","BK4501":"段永平概念","BK4538":"云计算","BK4527":"明星科技股","BK4559":"巴菲特持仓","BK4579":"人工智能","AMZN":"亚马逊","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓","BK4503":"景林资产持仓","BK4574":"无人驾驶","BK4122":"互联网与直销零售","BK4551":"寇图资本持仓","BK4573":"虚拟现实","BK4505":"高瓴资本持仓"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/04/15/the-best-stocks-to-invest-1000-in-right-now/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2227293602","content_text":"If I was looking to allocate $1,000 in stocks today, I would concentrate on industry leaders and beloved brands that still have bright futures. I believe Amazon ( AMZN -2.46% ) and Apple ( AAPL -3.00% ) are still two very attractive investments to hold until retirement.These stocks have made investors massive returns over the last 10 years, and it's no secret why. They provide products and services used by billions of people, and their techy nature and massive revenue streams enable them to manufacture growth by continuing to delight their customers with innovation. After reviewing what these companies are up to (see below), consider investing $1,000 in the one stock you like best, or splitting the total and putting $500 into each if you can't decide.Image source: Getty Images.AmazonAmazon's stock price is down 8.5% over the last year, which trails the 7.4% positive return of the broader market as measured by the S&P 500 index. But it's only a matter of time before Amazon takes off again. While revenue is not growing as fast as it was in 2020, revenue was still up 57% in the fourth quarter of 2021 over the same quarter in 2019.Amazon doesn't innovate in the same way a product manufacturer like Apple does. Instead, Amazon's innovation is through faster delivery speeds, which is crucial to staying ahead of competitors. This is why Amazon was able to accelerate revenue during the pandemic. It doubled its fulfillment capacity over the last two years, which is not easy for a company that generated $470 billion in revenue last year.Market participants are focused on near-term headwinds, such as a tight labor market, higher labor costs, and inflationary pressures on Amazon's bottom line. In the fourth quarter, higher costs to deal with these issues cut Amazon's operating profit in half compared to the year-ago quarter. But CEO Andy Jessy is not only optimistic about where the business is headed. He suggested in Amazon's 2021 annual report that there are still new areas of growth that Amazon hasn't even penetrated yet:Amazon is a big company with some large businesses, but it's still early days for us. We will continue to be insurgent -- inventing in businesses that we're in, in new businesses that we've yet to launch, and in new ideas that we haven't even imagined yet. It remains Day 1.Amazon has been a great growth stock to own over the last few decades. A $1,000 investment in Amazon in 2012 would be worth over $16,000 today. It may not return the same amount over the next decade, but Amazon's investments in expanding fulfillment capacity spell more revenue growth ahead. You can't go wrong holding this top growth stock for the long haul.AppleApple is launching its budget-friendly iPhone SE at the right time. Last quarter, Apple reported record product revenue of $104 billion following last fall's launch of the new iPhone 13. This performance was impressive given the supply chain constraints that have made sourcing components difficult in the semiconductor industry over the last year.Growth in Apple's installed base of devices is fueling record revenue in services, which hit $19 billion, up 24% year over year. Higher demand for apps and subscriptions is also driving higher margins, and Apple may not be done stacking its service lineup with ways to add more recurring revenue in the business.Bloomberg recently reported that Apple may be planning to offer a subscription plan for customers to buy hardware devices. This could further accelerate the adoption of iPhones, making them more affordable for the masses.Apple's stock price more than tripled over the last three years. Its higher valuation might keep it from delivering similar returns over the next few years, but demand for iPhones is great news for the long-term growth in the lucrative services business. Analysts expect Apple to generate 10% annualized growth in earnings per share over the next five years, and that's probably a reasonable estimate of what kind of returns investors can expect.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":17,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9050332277,"gmtCreate":1654131312499,"gmtModify":1676535399878,"author":{"id":"3562758894473836","authorId":"3562758894473836","name":"Kaelyn","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3562758894473836","authorIdStr":"3562758894473836"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[smile]&nbsp;","listText":"[smile]&nbsp;","text":"[smile]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9050332277","repostId":"1150961641","repostType":2,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":536,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}