Jiangbox personal page - To The Moon

Jiangbox

Jiangbox

No personal profile

24Follow

4Followers

0Topic

0Badge

2023-03-23

$Semiconductor Bull 3X Shares(SOXL)$ Bullish

2023-01-08

K

@十萬個品牌故事: 海螺水泥：世界上造水泥的那麼多，為啥偏偏海螺水泥能一家獨大?｜十萬個品牌故事

2022-12-16

$OVERSEA-CHINESE BANKING CORP(O39.SI)$ up please.

2022-12-10

Die

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2022-12-09

$VENTURE CORPORATION LIMITED(V03.SI)$

2022-12-09

Brazil will win.

2022-02-19

Buy put.

昨夜今晨 | 俄乌局势惊扰市场！美股连跌两周

2022-01-06

Die, all red.

Nasdaq posts biggest daily drop since Feb after 'hawkish' Fed minutes

2022-01-05

Amd

AMD Vs. Intel Stock: Which Is The Better Buy For 2025?

2022-01-02

Can buy?

If I Could Buy Only 1 Stock in 2022, This Would Be It

2022-01-01

Up more.

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2022-01-01

Up more.

What Happens When the S&P 500 Climbs More Than 25% in a Year? This Chart Shows Midteen Gains Usually Follow

2021-12-30

Die

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2021-12-30

Die

Naked Brands Stock Bounces Sharply Higher after Post-Split Tumble

2021-08-23

Buy on dips.

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2021-06-22

Bitcoin is going to drop to below 20k soon.

After China causes bitcoin to crater, threat of new U.S. regulations loom over crypto market, experts say

2021-06-22

Only US stocks are going up, continue to buy US stocks.

Amazon and Apple are the most valuable brands in the world -- but these Chinese companies are catching up

2021-06-20

Will consider to add more.

PLTR Stock: The Palantir-FAA Deal News Should Have Investors Smiling Today

2021-06-20

AMC still got room to shoot up, target 80-90.

3 Meme Stocks Wall Street Predicts Will Plunge More Than 20%

2021-06-20

Apple can keep for long term.

Beware these risky tech stocks in your portfolio, strategist Parker warns

Go to Tiger App to see more news

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"userPageInfo":{"id":"3562919640401993","uuid":"3562919640401993","gmtCreate":1599825943934,"gmtModify":1612615471638,"name":"Jiangbox","pinyin":"jiangbox","introduction":"","introductionEn":"","signature":"","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7379f7108480b709cc9a6a874592f0ae","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":4,"headSize":24,"tweetSize":85,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":3,"name":"书生虎","nameTw":"書生虎","represent":"努力向上","factor":"发布10条非转发主帖,其中5条获得他人回复或点赞","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":"success","userBadges":[{"badgeId":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493-3","templateUuid":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493","name":" Tiger Idol","description":"Join the tiger community for 1500 days","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8b40ae7da5bf081a1c84df14bf9e6367","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f160eceddd7c284a8e1136557615cfad","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/11792805c468334a9b31c39f95a41c6a","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2024.10.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be-3","templateUuid":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be","name":"Legendary Trader","description":"Total number of securities or futures transactions reached 300","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/656db16598a0b8f21429e10d6c1cb033","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/03f10910d4dd9234f9b5702a3342193a","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0c767e35268feb729d50d3fa9a386c5a","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2022.03.02","exceedPercentage":"93.83%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100},{"badgeId":"44212b71d0be4ec88898348dbe882e03-3","templateUuid":"44212b71d0be4ec88898348dbe882e03","name":"President Tiger","description":"The transaction amount of the securities account reaches $1,000,000","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fbeac6bb240db7da8b972e5183d050ba","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/436cdf80292b99f0a992e78750ac4e3a","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/506a259a7b456f037592c3b23c779599","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.22","exceedPercentage":"93.64%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1101},{"badgeId":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789-1","templateUuid":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789","name":"Knowledgeable Investor","description":"Traded more than 10 stocks","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e74cc24115c4fbae6154ec1b1041bf47","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d48265cbfd97c57f9048db29f22227b0","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76c6d6898b073c77e1c537ebe9ac1c57","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1102},{"badgeId":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84-1","templateUuid":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84","name":"Real Trader","description":"Completed a transaction","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":5,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"location":null,"starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"post","tweets":[{"id":9943525839,"gmtCreate":1679575674322,"gmtModify":1679577338177,"author":{"id":"3562919640401993","authorId":"3562919640401993","name":"Jiangbox","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7379f7108480b709cc9a6a874592f0ae","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3562919640401993","authorIdStr":"3562919640401993"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/SOXL\">$Semiconductor Bull 3X Shares(SOXL)$&nbsp;</a>Bullish","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/SOXL\">$Semiconductor Bull 3X Shares(SOXL)$&nbsp;</a>Bullish","text":"$Semiconductor Bull 3X Shares(SOXL)$ Bullish","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9943525839","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":324,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"subType":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9953304685,"gmtCreate":1673147110148,"gmtModify":1676538792410,"author":{"id":"3562919640401993","authorId":"3562919640401993","name":"Jiangbox","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7379f7108480b709cc9a6a874592f0ae","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3562919640401993","authorIdStr":"3562919640401993"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"K","listText":"K","text":"K","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9953304685","repostId":"628691901","repostType":1,"repost":{"id":628691901,"gmtCreate":1673103055106,"gmtModify":1676538791607,"author":{"id":"9000000000000102","authorId":"9000000000000102","name":"十萬個品牌故事","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"9000000000000102","authorIdStr":"9000000000000102"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"\n \n \n  海螺水泥：世界上造水泥的那麼多，為啥偏偏海螺水泥能一家獨大?｜十萬個品牌故事\n \n","listText":"海螺水泥：世界上造水泥的那麼多，為啥偏偏海螺水泥能一家獨大?｜十萬個品牌故事","text":"海螺水泥：世界上造水泥的那麼多，為啥偏偏海螺水泥能一家獨大?｜十萬個品牌故事","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8f1d0abe1fcefe59b19681c0d9ea556c","width":"0","height":"0"}],"top":1,"highlighted":2,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/628691901","isVote":1,"tweetType":2,"object":{"id":"6a266fca7bae42a7bb429de66255433a","tweetId":"628691901","title":"海螺水泥：世界上造水泥的那麼多，為啥偏偏海螺水泥能一家獨大?｜十萬個品牌故事","videoUrl":"http://v.tigerbbs.com/1673103047630c6b055693a9f64ecb5b0f66631e43e8b.mp4","poster":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8f1d0abe1fcefe59b19681c0d9ea556c","shareLink":"http://v.tigerbbs.com/1673103047630c6b055693a9f64ecb5b0f66631e43e8b.mp4"},"viewCount":0,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":378,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9928907733,"gmtCreate":1671159509223,"gmtModify":1676538501451,"author":{"id":"3562919640401993","authorId":"3562919640401993","name":"Jiangbox","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7379f7108480b709cc9a6a874592f0ae","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3562919640401993","authorIdStr":"3562919640401993"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/O39.SI\">$OVERSEA-CHINESE BANKING CORP(O39.SI)$&nbsp;</a>up please.","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/O39.SI\">$OVERSEA-CHINESE BANKING CORP(O39.SI)$&nbsp;</a>up please.","text":"$OVERSEA-CHINESE BANKING CORP(O39.SI)$ up please.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9928907733","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":344,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9929891033,"gmtCreate":1670633992023,"gmtModify":1676538408249,"author":{"id":"3562919640401993","authorId":"3562919640401993","name":"Jiangbox","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7379f7108480b709cc9a6a874592f0ae","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3562919640401993","authorIdStr":"3562919640401993"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Die","listText":"Die","text":"Die","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9929891033","repostId":"2290253511","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":391,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9929909604,"gmtCreate":1670575824608,"gmtModify":1676538397346,"author":{"id":"3562919640401993","authorId":"3562919640401993","name":"Jiangbox","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7379f7108480b709cc9a6a874592f0ae","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3562919640401993","authorIdStr":"3562919640401993"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/V03.SI\">$VENTURE CORPORATION LIMITED(V03.SI)$ &nbsp;</a>","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/V03.SI\">$VENTURE CORPORATION LIMITED(V03.SI)$ &nbsp;</a>","text":"$VENTURE CORPORATION LIMITED(V03.SI)$","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/388438238b408910c6bc722af5fa434b","width":"1080","height":"1920"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9929909604","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":314,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9929900395,"gmtCreate":1670575458718,"gmtModify":1676538397268,"author":{"id":"3562919640401993","authorId":"3562919640401993","name":"Jiangbox","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7379f7108480b709cc9a6a874592f0ae","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3562919640401993","authorIdStr":"3562919640401993"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Brazil will win.","listText":"Brazil will win.","text":"Brazil will win.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9929900395","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":370,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9094764776,"gmtCreate":1645238605626,"gmtModify":1676534012220,"author":{"id":"3562919640401993","authorId":"3562919640401993","name":"Jiangbox","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7379f7108480b709cc9a6a874592f0ae","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3562919640401993","authorIdStr":"3562919640401993"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Buy put.","listText":"Buy put.","text":"Buy put.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9094764776","repostId":"1154007444","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1154007444","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"为用户提供金融资讯、行情、数据，旨在帮助投资者理解世界，做投资决策。","home_visible":1,"media_name":"老虎资讯综合","id":"102","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1645225649,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1154007444?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-02-19 07:07","market":"us","language":"zh","title":"昨夜今晨 | 俄乌局势惊扰市场！美股连跌两周","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1154007444","media":"老虎资讯综合","summary":"摘要：三大指数集体收跌，热门中概股普跌；防止“炒股风波”重演！美联储出台全面交易限制；纽约联储质疑升息50基点必要性；重要芯片研发进程滞后，英特尔股价大跌逾5%>>>海外市场收盘：俄乌局势惊扰市场，美","content":"<html><head></head><body><blockquote><b>摘要：</b>三大指数集体收跌，热门中概股普跌；防止“炒股风波”重演！美联储出台全面交易限制；纽约联储质疑升息50基点必要性；重要芯片研发进程滞后，<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/INTC\">英特尔</a>股价大跌逾5%&gt;&gt;&gt;</blockquote><p><b>海外市场</b></p><p><b>收盘：俄乌局势惊扰市场，美股连续第二周下滑</b></p><p>俄乌局势和加息前景仍在主导市场情绪，三大指数悉数收跌，纳指跌超1%，美股市场连续第二周录得下跌。截至收盘，道琼斯指数跌0.68%，报34,079.18点；标普500指数跌0.72%，报4,348.87点；纳斯达克指数跌1.23%，报13,548.07点。</p><p><b>热门中概股收盘普跌，<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ZH\">知乎</a>跌超12%，<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BILI\">哔哩哔哩</a>跌超6%</b></p><p>热门中概股集体下挫，<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BABA\">阿里巴巴</a>跌4.37%，<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/JD\">京东</a>跌3.61%，微博跌5.16%，<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PDD\">拼多多</a>跌6.05%，哔哩哔哩跌6.19%，<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BIDU\">百度</a>跌5.22%，<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/EDU\">新东方</a>跌3.18%，<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NTES\">网易</a>跌1.32%，<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TME\">腾讯音乐</a>跌5.68%，<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/IQ\">爱奇艺</a>跌6.58%，<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DIDI\">滴滴</a>跌5.40%，知乎跌超12%，<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/YMM\">满帮</a>跌11.34%。</p><p><b>WTI原油期货收跌0.8%，本周下跌2.2%</b></p><p>原油期货价格周五收跌，使其周跌幅扩大至2%以上。纽约商品交易所3月交割的西德克萨斯中质原油（WTI）期货价格下跌69美分，跌幅近0.8%，收于每桶91.07美元。本周近月WTI合约下跌2.2%。</p><p><b>黄金期货收跌0.1%，本周上涨3.1%创9个月来最大周涨幅</b></p><p>黄金期货周五收低。在乌克兰危机推动下，金价周四升至八个月以来的最高收盘价，帮助其本周创下九个月以来的最大单周涨幅。纽约商品交易所4月交割的黄金期货价格下跌2.20美元，跌幅为0.1%，收于每盎司1899.80美元。本周黄金期货价格上涨3.1%，是2021年5月以来的最大单周涨幅。</p><p><b>欧股收盘普跌，德国DAX指数跌1.46%</b></p><p>德国DAX指数跌1.46%，<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/VUKE.UK\">英国富时100</a>指数跌0.31%，法国CAC40指数跌0.25%，欧洲斯托克50指数跌0.94%。</p><p><b>国际宏观</b></p><p><a href=\"https://ttm.financial/NW/2212467873\" target=\"_blank\"><b>美联储鸽派官员呼吁实质性调整政策，纽约联储质疑升息50基点必要性</b></a></p><p>美联储最鸽派的官员之一呼吁“实质性调整”货币政策，但淡化了激进紧缩的必要性，这是第二位反对下月加息50基点的美联储官员。芝加哥联储行长Charles Evans和纽约联储行长John Williams都明确给出了将在3月15-16日会议上加息25个基点的信号，但核心官员对最终需要降息多少仍持开放态度。</p><p><a href=\"https://ttm.financial/NW/2212733986\" target=\"_blank\"><b>美联储理事布雷纳德：在3月份会议上启动一系列加息是合适的</b></a></p><p>美联储理事布雷纳德表示，美联储已经准备好在下个月加息，并在未来的几次会议上决定开始缩减资产负债表。“鉴于我们已经看到了非常强劲的数据，我的确预计，在下一次会议上启动一系列加息是合适的，” 布雷纳德周五在芝加哥大学布斯商学院于纽约主办的一次会议的小组讨论中表示。</p><p><a href=\"https://ttm.financial/NW/2212678496\" target=\"_blank\"><b>美联储宣布全面的交易限制，以防再度发生道德丑闻</b></a></p><p>美联储正式对央行官员的投资和交易行为采取严厉而全面的限制，以防再次发生去年那种让美联储蒙羞的道德丑闻。这些变动以法规形式确定了去年10月宣布的限制主动交易的指导方针，禁止买卖个股，并提高决策者和高级工作人员的披露要求。</p><p><a href=\"https://ttm.financial/NW/2212518673\" target=\"_blank\"><b>拜登签署临时拨款法案，避免美国联邦政府停摆</b></a></p><p>美国总统拜登正式签署了美国国会参议院17日晚间通过的临时拨款法案，确保联邦政府有足够资金继续运转到3月11日，暂时避免了联邦政府停摆的窘境。</p><p><b>公司新闻</b></p><p><a href=\"https://ttm.financial/NW/2212466675\" target=\"_blank\"><b>报道称SpaceX按1:10拆股，为该公司首次股票拆分</b></a></p><p>据报道，<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">特斯拉</a>CEO埃隆-马斯克（Elon Musk）旗下太空探索公司SpaceX正在以1：10的比例拆分其普通股，该公司的估值已飙升至超过1000亿美元。</p><p><a href=\"https://ttm.financial/NW/2212267597\" target=\"_blank\"><b>Roku和特斯拉等股票下跌让木头姐的投资组合再受打击</b></a></p><p>木头姐Cathie Wood刚刚形容自己的投机性科技板块策略是一个“深度价值”投资组合，里面很多被低估的公司，但又一个动荡的交易日让她持有的一些大牌股票跌得更深了。美国股市周五下跌，2.2万亿美元期权到期放大了股市跌幅。Wood钟爱的Roku、特斯拉等股票也未能幸免，其中Roku暴跌22%，特斯拉下跌2%。</p><p><a href=\"https://ttm.financial/NW/2212471627\" target=\"_blank\"><b>莫德纳宣布启动疱疹病毒、癌症mRNA疫苗研发</b></a></p><p>生物医药企业莫德纳（Moderna）发布公告称，公司新增了三个mRNA疫苗开发项目，将使用与Spikevax新冠疫苗相同的技术。根据公告披露，三个新项目中，mRNA-1608候选疫苗旨在预防二型单纯疱疹病毒（HSV-2）；mRNA-1468疫苗用于降低水痘带状疱疹病毒的发病率；mRNA-4359用来测试这项技术治疗癌症的应用前景。</p><p><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GM\">通用汽车</a>向NHTSA申请批准部署自动驾驶汽车</b></p><p>通用汽车和其自动驾驶技术子公司Cruise周五表示，已向美国监管机构申请建造和部署一款自动驾驶汽车。这款汽车名为Cruise Origin，特点是不具备方向盘或刹车踏板等人工控制的部件。通用汽车和Cruise于2020年10月首次披露Cruise Origin，并计划在几个月内获得美国国家公路交通安全管理局(NHTSA)的批准。</p><p><a href=\"https://ttm.financial/NW/1176574333\" target=\"_blank\"><b>重要芯片研发进程滞后，英特尔股价大跌逾5%</b></a><b></b></p><p>英特尔股价周五收跌5.32%，原因是该公司首席执行官Pat Gelsinger周四证实，代号为Granite Rapids的服务器芯片将从2023年推迟至2024年，未来两年将不得不投入大量资金才能追上竞争对手。Granite Rapids是英特尔首款使用超紫外光刻技术的服务器处理器，这是英特尔追赶<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSM\">台积电</a>和其他顶级芯片制造商所需的关键技术。</p><p><b>爱马仕Q4财报不如预期，产能设限影响业绩</b></p><p>当地时间周五，法国奢侈品巨头爱马仕发布四季度及全年财报。数据显示，公司四季度总营收达到23.8亿欧元，以不变汇率计算同比增长11%，在奢侈品供不应求的大背景下逊于分析师预期的12%。究其原因，主要是皮具及马具部门营收下降逾5%，即便其他业务大都交出超过20%的增速，也抵不过第一大业务板块营收下降带来的影响。爱马仕CEO阿克塞尔·杜马斯透露，产能有限限制了公司业绩增长，做一个爱马仕的皮包需要15个小时的工序，尽管集团每年会招募400名工匠，但考虑到需要大量时间培训，产能的增长十分有限。</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>昨夜今晨 | 俄乌局势惊扰市场！美股连跌两周</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n昨夜今晨 | 俄乌局势惊扰市场！美股连跌两周\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/102\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">老虎资讯综合 </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-02-19 07:07</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><blockquote><b>摘要：</b>三大指数集体收跌，热门中概股普跌；防止“炒股风波”重演！美联储出台全面交易限制；纽约联储质疑升息50基点必要性；重要芯片研发进程滞后，<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/INTC\">英特尔</a>股价大跌逾5%&gt;&gt;&gt;</blockquote><p><b>海外市场</b></p><p><b>收盘：俄乌局势惊扰市场，美股连续第二周下滑</b></p><p>俄乌局势和加息前景仍在主导市场情绪，三大指数悉数收跌，纳指跌超1%，美股市场连续第二周录得下跌。截至收盘，道琼斯指数跌0.68%，报34,079.18点；标普500指数跌0.72%，报4,348.87点；纳斯达克指数跌1.23%，报13,548.07点。</p><p><b>热门中概股收盘普跌，<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ZH\">知乎</a>跌超12%，<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BILI\">哔哩哔哩</a>跌超6%</b></p><p>热门中概股集体下挫，<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BABA\">阿里巴巴</a>跌4.37%，<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/JD\">京东</a>跌3.61%，微博跌5.16%，<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PDD\">拼多多</a>跌6.05%，哔哩哔哩跌6.19%，<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BIDU\">百度</a>跌5.22%，<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/EDU\">新东方</a>跌3.18%，<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NTES\">网易</a>跌1.32%，<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TME\">腾讯音乐</a>跌5.68%，<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/IQ\">爱奇艺</a>跌6.58%，<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DIDI\">滴滴</a>跌5.40%，知乎跌超12%，<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/YMM\">满帮</a>跌11.34%。</p><p><b>WTI原油期货收跌0.8%，本周下跌2.2%</b></p><p>原油期货价格周五收跌，使其周跌幅扩大至2%以上。纽约商品交易所3月交割的西德克萨斯中质原油（WTI）期货价格下跌69美分，跌幅近0.8%，收于每桶91.07美元。本周近月WTI合约下跌2.2%。</p><p><b>黄金期货收跌0.1%，本周上涨3.1%创9个月来最大周涨幅</b></p><p>黄金期货周五收低。在乌克兰危机推动下，金价周四升至八个月以来的最高收盘价，帮助其本周创下九个月以来的最大单周涨幅。纽约商品交易所4月交割的黄金期货价格下跌2.20美元，跌幅为0.1%，收于每盎司1899.80美元。本周黄金期货价格上涨3.1%，是2021年5月以来的最大单周涨幅。</p><p><b>欧股收盘普跌，德国DAX指数跌1.46%</b></p><p>德国DAX指数跌1.46%，<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/VUKE.UK\">英国富时100</a>指数跌0.31%，法国CAC40指数跌0.25%，欧洲斯托克50指数跌0.94%。</p><p><b>国际宏观</b></p><p><a href=\"https://ttm.financial/NW/2212467873\" target=\"_blank\"><b>美联储鸽派官员呼吁实质性调整政策，纽约联储质疑升息50基点必要性</b></a></p><p>美联储最鸽派的官员之一呼吁“实质性调整”货币政策，但淡化了激进紧缩的必要性，这是第二位反对下月加息50基点的美联储官员。芝加哥联储行长Charles Evans和纽约联储行长John Williams都明确给出了将在3月15-16日会议上加息25个基点的信号，但核心官员对最终需要降息多少仍持开放态度。</p><p><a href=\"https://ttm.financial/NW/2212733986\" target=\"_blank\"><b>美联储理事布雷纳德：在3月份会议上启动一系列加息是合适的</b></a></p><p>美联储理事布雷纳德表示，美联储已经准备好在下个月加息，并在未来的几次会议上决定开始缩减资产负债表。“鉴于我们已经看到了非常强劲的数据，我的确预计，在下一次会议上启动一系列加息是合适的，” 布雷纳德周五在芝加哥大学布斯商学院于纽约主办的一次会议的小组讨论中表示。</p><p><a href=\"https://ttm.financial/NW/2212678496\" target=\"_blank\"><b>美联储宣布全面的交易限制，以防再度发生道德丑闻</b></a></p><p>美联储正式对央行官员的投资和交易行为采取严厉而全面的限制，以防再次发生去年那种让美联储蒙羞的道德丑闻。这些变动以法规形式确定了去年10月宣布的限制主动交易的指导方针，禁止买卖个股，并提高决策者和高级工作人员的披露要求。</p><p><a href=\"https://ttm.financial/NW/2212518673\" target=\"_blank\"><b>拜登签署临时拨款法案，避免美国联邦政府停摆</b></a></p><p>美国总统拜登正式签署了美国国会参议院17日晚间通过的临时拨款法案，确保联邦政府有足够资金继续运转到3月11日，暂时避免了联邦政府停摆的窘境。</p><p><b>公司新闻</b></p><p><a href=\"https://ttm.financial/NW/2212466675\" target=\"_blank\"><b>报道称SpaceX按1:10拆股，为该公司首次股票拆分</b></a></p><p>据报道，<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">特斯拉</a>CEO埃隆-马斯克（Elon Musk）旗下太空探索公司SpaceX正在以1：10的比例拆分其普通股，该公司的估值已飙升至超过1000亿美元。</p><p><a href=\"https://ttm.financial/NW/2212267597\" target=\"_blank\"><b>Roku和特斯拉等股票下跌让木头姐的投资组合再受打击</b></a></p><p>木头姐Cathie Wood刚刚形容自己的投机性科技板块策略是一个“深度价值”投资组合，里面很多被低估的公司，但又一个动荡的交易日让她持有的一些大牌股票跌得更深了。美国股市周五下跌，2.2万亿美元期权到期放大了股市跌幅。Wood钟爱的Roku、特斯拉等股票也未能幸免，其中Roku暴跌22%，特斯拉下跌2%。</p><p><a href=\"https://ttm.financial/NW/2212471627\" target=\"_blank\"><b>莫德纳宣布启动疱疹病毒、癌症mRNA疫苗研发</b></a></p><p>生物医药企业莫德纳（Moderna）发布公告称，公司新增了三个mRNA疫苗开发项目，将使用与Spikevax新冠疫苗相同的技术。根据公告披露，三个新项目中，mRNA-1608候选疫苗旨在预防二型单纯疱疹病毒（HSV-2）；mRNA-1468疫苗用于降低水痘带状疱疹病毒的发病率；mRNA-4359用来测试这项技术治疗癌症的应用前景。</p><p><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GM\">通用汽车</a>向NHTSA申请批准部署自动驾驶汽车</b></p><p>通用汽车和其自动驾驶技术子公司Cruise周五表示，已向美国监管机构申请建造和部署一款自动驾驶汽车。这款汽车名为Cruise Origin，特点是不具备方向盘或刹车踏板等人工控制的部件。通用汽车和Cruise于2020年10月首次披露Cruise Origin，并计划在几个月内获得美国国家公路交通安全管理局(NHTSA)的批准。</p><p><a href=\"https://ttm.financial/NW/1176574333\" target=\"_blank\"><b>重要芯片研发进程滞后，英特尔股价大跌逾5%</b></a><b></b></p><p>英特尔股价周五收跌5.32%，原因是该公司首席执行官Pat Gelsinger周四证实，代号为Granite Rapids的服务器芯片将从2023年推迟至2024年，未来两年将不得不投入大量资金才能追上竞争对手。Granite Rapids是英特尔首款使用超紫外光刻技术的服务器处理器，这是英特尔追赶<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSM\">台积电</a>和其他顶级芯片制造商所需的关键技术。</p><p><b>爱马仕Q4财报不如预期，产能设限影响业绩</b></p><p>当地时间周五，法国奢侈品巨头爱马仕发布四季度及全年财报。数据显示，公司四季度总营收达到23.8亿欧元，以不变汇率计算同比增长11%，在奢侈品供不应求的大背景下逊于分析师预期的12%。究其原因，主要是皮具及马具部门营收下降逾5%，即便其他业务大都交出超过20%的增速，也抵不过第一大业务板块营收下降带来的影响。爱马仕CEO阿克塞尔·杜马斯透露，产能有限限制了公司业绩增长，做一个爱马仕的皮包需要15个小时的工序，尽管集团每年会招募400名工匠，但考虑到需要大量时间培训，产能的增长十分有限。</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b23574aac95526c9e5c62ebc8dd25130","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"","is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1154007444","content_text":"摘要：三大指数集体收跌，热门中概股普跌；防止“炒股风波”重演！美联储出台全面交易限制；纽约联储质疑升息50基点必要性；重要芯片研发进程滞后，英特尔股价大跌逾5%>>>海外市场收盘：俄乌局势惊扰市场，美股连续第二周下滑俄乌局势和加息前景仍在主导市场情绪，三大指数悉数收跌，纳指跌超1%，美股市场连续第二周录得下跌。截至收盘，道琼斯指数跌0.68%，报34,079.18点；标普500指数跌0.72%，报4,348.87点；纳斯达克指数跌1.23%，报13,548.07点。热门中概股收盘普跌，知乎跌超12%，哔哩哔哩跌超6%热门中概股集体下挫，阿里巴巴跌4.37%，京东跌3.61%，微博跌5.16%，拼多多跌6.05%，哔哩哔哩跌6.19%，百度跌5.22%，新东方跌3.18%，网易跌1.32%，腾讯音乐跌5.68%，爱奇艺跌6.58%，滴滴跌5.40%，知乎跌超12%，满帮跌11.34%。WTI原油期货收跌0.8%，本周下跌2.2%原油期货价格周五收跌，使其周跌幅扩大至2%以上。纽约商品交易所3月交割的西德克萨斯中质原油（WTI）期货价格下跌69美分，跌幅近0.8%，收于每桶91.07美元。本周近月WTI合约下跌2.2%。黄金期货收跌0.1%，本周上涨3.1%创9个月来最大周涨幅黄金期货周五收低。在乌克兰危机推动下，金价周四升至八个月以来的最高收盘价，帮助其本周创下九个月以来的最大单周涨幅。纽约商品交易所4月交割的黄金期货价格下跌2.20美元，跌幅为0.1%，收于每盎司1899.80美元。本周黄金期货价格上涨3.1%，是2021年5月以来的最大单周涨幅。欧股收盘普跌，德国DAX指数跌1.46%德国DAX指数跌1.46%，英国富时100指数跌0.31%，法国CAC40指数跌0.25%，欧洲斯托克50指数跌0.94%。国际宏观美联储鸽派官员呼吁实质性调整政策，纽约联储质疑升息50基点必要性美联储最鸽派的官员之一呼吁“实质性调整”货币政策，但淡化了激进紧缩的必要性，这是第二位反对下月加息50基点的美联储官员。芝加哥联储行长Charles Evans和纽约联储行长John Williams都明确给出了将在3月15-16日会议上加息25个基点的信号，但核心官员对最终需要降息多少仍持开放态度。美联储理事布雷纳德：在3月份会议上启动一系列加息是合适的美联储理事布雷纳德表示，美联储已经准备好在下个月加息，并在未来的几次会议上决定开始缩减资产负债表。“鉴于我们已经看到了非常强劲的数据，我的确预计，在下一次会议上启动一系列加息是合适的，” 布雷纳德周五在芝加哥大学布斯商学院于纽约主办的一次会议的小组讨论中表示。美联储宣布全面的交易限制，以防再度发生道德丑闻美联储正式对央行官员的投资和交易行为采取严厉而全面的限制，以防再次发生去年那种让美联储蒙羞的道德丑闻。这些变动以法规形式确定了去年10月宣布的限制主动交易的指导方针，禁止买卖个股，并提高决策者和高级工作人员的披露要求。拜登签署临时拨款法案，避免美国联邦政府停摆美国总统拜登正式签署了美国国会参议院17日晚间通过的临时拨款法案，确保联邦政府有足够资金继续运转到3月11日，暂时避免了联邦政府停摆的窘境。公司新闻报道称SpaceX按1:10拆股，为该公司首次股票拆分据报道，特斯拉CEO埃隆-马斯克（Elon Musk）旗下太空探索公司SpaceX正在以1：10的比例拆分其普通股，该公司的估值已飙升至超过1000亿美元。Roku和特斯拉等股票下跌让木头姐的投资组合再受打击木头姐Cathie Wood刚刚形容自己的投机性科技板块策略是一个“深度价值”投资组合，里面很多被低估的公司，但又一个动荡的交易日让她持有的一些大牌股票跌得更深了。美国股市周五下跌，2.2万亿美元期权到期放大了股市跌幅。Wood钟爱的Roku、特斯拉等股票也未能幸免，其中Roku暴跌22%，特斯拉下跌2%。莫德纳宣布启动疱疹病毒、癌症mRNA疫苗研发生物医药企业莫德纳（Moderna）发布公告称，公司新增了三个mRNA疫苗开发项目，将使用与Spikevax新冠疫苗相同的技术。根据公告披露，三个新项目中，mRNA-1608候选疫苗旨在预防二型单纯疱疹病毒（HSV-2）；mRNA-1468疫苗用于降低水痘带状疱疹病毒的发病率；mRNA-4359用来测试这项技术治疗癌症的应用前景。通用汽车向NHTSA申请批准部署自动驾驶汽车通用汽车和其自动驾驶技术子公司Cruise周五表示，已向美国监管机构申请建造和部署一款自动驾驶汽车。这款汽车名为Cruise Origin，特点是不具备方向盘或刹车踏板等人工控制的部件。通用汽车和Cruise于2020年10月首次披露Cruise Origin，并计划在几个月内获得美国国家公路交通安全管理局(NHTSA)的批准。重要芯片研发进程滞后，英特尔股价大跌逾5%英特尔股价周五收跌5.32%，原因是该公司首席执行官Pat Gelsinger周四证实，代号为Granite Rapids的服务器芯片将从2023年推迟至2024年，未来两年将不得不投入大量资金才能追上竞争对手。Granite Rapids是英特尔首款使用超紫外光刻技术的服务器处理器，这是英特尔追赶台积电和其他顶级芯片制造商所需的关键技术。爱马仕Q4财报不如预期，产能设限影响业绩当地时间周五，法国奢侈品巨头爱马仕发布四季度及全年财报。数据显示，公司四季度总营收达到23.8亿欧元，以不变汇率计算同比增长11%，在奢侈品供不应求的大背景下逊于分析师预期的12%。究其原因，主要是皮具及马具部门营收下降逾5%，即便其他业务大都交出超过20%的增速，也抵不过第一大业务板块营收下降带来的影响。爱马仕CEO阿克塞尔·杜马斯透露，产能有限限制了公司业绩增长，做一个爱马仕的皮包需要15个小时的工序，尽管集团每年会招募400名工匠，但考虑到需要大量时间培训，产能的增长十分有限。","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":515,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9008671307,"gmtCreate":1641439247403,"gmtModify":1676533615861,"author":{"id":"3562919640401993","authorId":"3562919640401993","name":"Jiangbox","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7379f7108480b709cc9a6a874592f0ae","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3562919640401993","authorIdStr":"3562919640401993"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Die, all red.","listText":"Die, all red.","text":"Die, all red.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9008671307","repostId":"2201255535","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2201255535","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1641423313,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2201255535?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-01-06 06:55","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Nasdaq posts biggest daily drop since Feb after 'hawkish' Fed minutes","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2201255535","media":"Reuters","summary":"* S&P 500 posts biggest daily pct fall since Nov. 26* Fed minutes show officials said labor market \"very tight\"* Indexes: Dow down 1.1%, S&P 500 down 1.9%, Nasdaq down 3.3%NEW YORK, Jan 5 (Reuters) - ","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>* S&amp;P 500 posts biggest daily pct fall since Nov. 26</p><p>* Fed minutes show officials said labor market &#34;very tight&#34;</p><p>* Indexes: Dow down 1.1%, S&amp;P 500 down 1.9%, Nasdaq down 3.3%</p><p>NEW YORK, Jan 5 (Reuters) - U.S. stocks fell sharply on Wednesday, with the Nasdaq plunging more than 3% in its biggest one-day percentage drop since February, after U.S. Federal Reserve meeting minutes signaled the central bank may raise interest rates sooner than expected.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 fell more than 1%, its biggest daily percentage decline since Nov. 26, the first day of trading after news of the Omicron variant of the coronavirus.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 and Nasdaq quickly extended their declines after the release of the minutes, which investors viewed as more hawkish than they had feared. The Dow, which hit a record high earlier in the day, reversed course and ended down more than 1%.</p><p>The selloff was broad, with all S&amp;P sectors ending in the red, and Wall Street&#39;s fear gauge, the Cboe Volatility index, closing at its highest level since Dec. 21.</p><p>In the minutes from the Fed&#39;s Dec. 14-15 policy meeting, central bank policymakers said a &#34;very tight&#34; job market and unabated inflation might require the Fed to raise rates sooner and begin reducing its overall asset holdings as a second brake on the economy.</p><p>&#34;Indications that the Fed is very concerned about inflation could quickly create a view that the Fed will aggressively tighten in 2022,&#34; said David Carter, chief investment officer at Lenox Wealth Advisors in New York, calling the minutes &#34;more hawkish than expected.&#34;</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 technology sector fell 3.1% and was the biggest drag on the benchmark index, while the rate-sensitive real estate sector dropped 3.2% in its biggest daily percentage decline since Jan. 4, 2021.</p><p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 392.54 points, or 1.07%, to 36,407.11, the S&amp;P 500 lost 92.96 points, or 1.94%, to 4,700.58 and the Nasdaq Composite dropped 522.54 points, or 3.34%, to 15,100.17.</p><p>Rising interest rates increase borrowing costs for businesses and consumers, and higher rates can depress stock multiples, especially for technology and other growth stocks.</p><p>Growth shares have been under pressure from a recent rise in U.S. Treasury yields.</p><p>The Russell 2000 index also suffered its biggest one-day drop since Nov. 26, while the S&amp;P 500 financials index fell 1.3%, a day after it registered an all-time closing high.</p><p>Policymakers in December agreed to hasten the end of their pandemic-era program of bond purchases, and issued forecasts anticipating three quarter-percentage-point rate increases during 2022. The Fed&#39;s benchmark overnight interest rate is currently set near zero.</p><p>Early in the day, an ADP National Employment report showed private payrolls increased by 807,000 jobs last month, more than double of what economists polled by Reuters had forecast.</p><p>The report comes ahead of the Labor Department&#39;s more comprehensive and closely watched nonfarm payrolls data for December on Friday.</p><p>Declining issues outnumbered advancing ones on the NYSE by a 4.32-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 4.22-to-1 ratio favored decliners.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 posted 59 new 52-week highs and 1 new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 81 new highs and 307 new lows.</p><p>Volume on U.S. exchanges was 12.18 billion shares, compared with the 10.4 billion average for the full session over the last 20 trading days.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Nasdaq posts biggest daily drop since Feb after 'hawkish' Fed minutes</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nNasdaq posts biggest daily drop since Feb after 'hawkish' Fed minutes\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-01-06 06:55</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>* S&amp;P 500 posts biggest daily pct fall since Nov. 26</p><p>* Fed minutes show officials said labor market &#34;very tight&#34;</p><p>* Indexes: Dow down 1.1%, S&amp;P 500 down 1.9%, Nasdaq down 3.3%</p><p>NEW YORK, Jan 5 (Reuters) - U.S. stocks fell sharply on Wednesday, with the Nasdaq plunging more than 3% in its biggest one-day percentage drop since February, after U.S. Federal Reserve meeting minutes signaled the central bank may raise interest rates sooner than expected.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 fell more than 1%, its biggest daily percentage decline since Nov. 26, the first day of trading after news of the Omicron variant of the coronavirus.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 and Nasdaq quickly extended their declines after the release of the minutes, which investors viewed as more hawkish than they had feared. The Dow, which hit a record high earlier in the day, reversed course and ended down more than 1%.</p><p>The selloff was broad, with all S&amp;P sectors ending in the red, and Wall Street&#39;s fear gauge, the Cboe Volatility index, closing at its highest level since Dec. 21.</p><p>In the minutes from the Fed&#39;s Dec. 14-15 policy meeting, central bank policymakers said a &#34;very tight&#34; job market and unabated inflation might require the Fed to raise rates sooner and begin reducing its overall asset holdings as a second brake on the economy.</p><p>&#34;Indications that the Fed is very concerned about inflation could quickly create a view that the Fed will aggressively tighten in 2022,&#34; said David Carter, chief investment officer at Lenox Wealth Advisors in New York, calling the minutes &#34;more hawkish than expected.&#34;</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 technology sector fell 3.1% and was the biggest drag on the benchmark index, while the rate-sensitive real estate sector dropped 3.2% in its biggest daily percentage decline since Jan. 4, 2021.</p><p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 392.54 points, or 1.07%, to 36,407.11, the S&amp;P 500 lost 92.96 points, or 1.94%, to 4,700.58 and the Nasdaq Composite dropped 522.54 points, or 3.34%, to 15,100.17.</p><p>Rising interest rates increase borrowing costs for businesses and consumers, and higher rates can depress stock multiples, especially for technology and other growth stocks.</p><p>Growth shares have been under pressure from a recent rise in U.S. Treasury yields.</p><p>The Russell 2000 index also suffered its biggest one-day drop since Nov. 26, while the S&amp;P 500 financials index fell 1.3%, a day after it registered an all-time closing high.</p><p>Policymakers in December agreed to hasten the end of their pandemic-era program of bond purchases, and issued forecasts anticipating three quarter-percentage-point rate increases during 2022. The Fed&#39;s benchmark overnight interest rate is currently set near zero.</p><p>Early in the day, an ADP National Employment report showed private payrolls increased by 807,000 jobs last month, more than double of what economists polled by Reuters had forecast.</p><p>The report comes ahead of the Labor Department&#39;s more comprehensive and closely watched nonfarm payrolls data for December on Friday.</p><p>Declining issues outnumbered advancing ones on the NYSE by a 4.32-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 4.22-to-1 ratio favored decliners.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 posted 59 new 52-week highs and 1 new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 81 new highs and 307 new lows.</p><p>Volume on U.S. exchanges was 12.18 billion shares, compared with the 10.4 billion average for the full session over the last 20 trading days.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SPY":"标普500ETF","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","BK4559":"巴菲特持仓",".DJI":"道琼斯","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite","BK4504":"桥水持仓",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2201255535","content_text":"* S&P 500 posts biggest daily pct fall since Nov. 26* Fed minutes show officials said labor market \"very tight\"* Indexes: Dow down 1.1%, S&P 500 down 1.9%, Nasdaq down 3.3%NEW YORK, Jan 5 (Reuters) - U.S. stocks fell sharply on Wednesday, with the Nasdaq plunging more than 3% in its biggest one-day percentage drop since February, after U.S. Federal Reserve meeting minutes signaled the central bank may raise interest rates sooner than expected.The S&P 500 fell more than 1%, its biggest daily percentage decline since Nov. 26, the first day of trading after news of the Omicron variant of the coronavirus.The S&P 500 and Nasdaq quickly extended their declines after the release of the minutes, which investors viewed as more hawkish than they had feared. The Dow, which hit a record high earlier in the day, reversed course and ended down more than 1%.The selloff was broad, with all S&P sectors ending in the red, and Wall Street's fear gauge, the Cboe Volatility index, closing at its highest level since Dec. 21.In the minutes from the Fed's Dec. 14-15 policy meeting, central bank policymakers said a \"very tight\" job market and unabated inflation might require the Fed to raise rates sooner and begin reducing its overall asset holdings as a second brake on the economy.\"Indications that the Fed is very concerned about inflation could quickly create a view that the Fed will aggressively tighten in 2022,\" said David Carter, chief investment officer at Lenox Wealth Advisors in New York, calling the minutes \"more hawkish than expected.\"The S&P 500 technology sector fell 3.1% and was the biggest drag on the benchmark index, while the rate-sensitive real estate sector dropped 3.2% in its biggest daily percentage decline since Jan. 4, 2021.The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 392.54 points, or 1.07%, to 36,407.11, the S&P 500 lost 92.96 points, or 1.94%, to 4,700.58 and the Nasdaq Composite dropped 522.54 points, or 3.34%, to 15,100.17.Rising interest rates increase borrowing costs for businesses and consumers, and higher rates can depress stock multiples, especially for technology and other growth stocks.Growth shares have been under pressure from a recent rise in U.S. Treasury yields.The Russell 2000 index also suffered its biggest one-day drop since Nov. 26, while the S&P 500 financials index fell 1.3%, a day after it registered an all-time closing high.Policymakers in December agreed to hasten the end of their pandemic-era program of bond purchases, and issued forecasts anticipating three quarter-percentage-point rate increases during 2022. The Fed's benchmark overnight interest rate is currently set near zero.Early in the day, an ADP National Employment report showed private payrolls increased by 807,000 jobs last month, more than double of what economists polled by Reuters had forecast.The report comes ahead of the Labor Department's more comprehensive and closely watched nonfarm payrolls data for December on Friday.Declining issues outnumbered advancing ones on the NYSE by a 4.32-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 4.22-to-1 ratio favored decliners.The S&P 500 posted 59 new 52-week highs and 1 new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 81 new highs and 307 new lows.Volume on U.S. exchanges was 12.18 billion shares, compared with the 10.4 billion average for the full session over the last 20 trading days.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":744,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9008338401,"gmtCreate":1641356486105,"gmtModify":1676533605550,"author":{"id":"3562919640401993","authorId":"3562919640401993","name":"Jiangbox","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7379f7108480b709cc9a6a874592f0ae","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3562919640401993","authorIdStr":"3562919640401993"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Amd","listText":"Amd","text":"Amd","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9008338401","repostId":"1194155159","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1194155159","pubTimestamp":1641352023,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1194155159?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-01-05 11:07","market":"us","language":"en","title":"AMD Vs. Intel Stock: Which Is The Better Buy For 2025?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1194155159","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"SummaryIntel will likely spend more than $100 billion in building new fabs in the next 5 years.Meanw","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>Summary</b></p><ul><li>Intel will likely spend more than $100 billion in building new fabs in the next 5 years.</li><li>Meanwhile, AMD continues to sub-contract its chip production to others.</li><li>Intel&#39;s IP (Intellectual Property) should give it an advantage in the chip-making market.</li><li>The ARMy is coming for both Intel and AMD.</li></ul><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a089082342ac5b46ade603677d86114d\" tg-width=\"1536\" tg-height=\"1024\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>sefa ozel/E+ via Getty Images</span></p><p>Intel(NASDAQ:INTC) and AMD(NASDAQ:AMD) have been competitors for more than 50 years. Both were founded by former Fairchild Semiconductor International engineers, Intel in 1968 by Gordon Moore, and AMD in 1969 by Jerry Sanders.</p><p>Fast forward to the 21st century and Intel dominated for the first 15 years, but AMD has made huge progress in the last five years and is now considered by many to be the superior technical innovator of X86 CPUs.</p><p>But as we look forward to the next five years, who will dominate? I would argue that the future will be much different than the past with the competitive situation between the two still prominent but the overall businesses themselves will diverge significantly by 2025.</p><p>I have written over 50 articles on the two companies and have been especially praiseworthy of AMD and its uber-CEO, Lisa Su. But over the next five years and beyond, I see less direct technical competition as Intel massively diversifies into the chip manufacturing business as well as maintaining its traditional CPU market.</p><p>In 2018 I wrote this about AMD and the management skills shown by its new CEO Lisa Su &#34;AMD: 5 Reasons The Shorts Will Be Changing Their Shorts Shortly&#34; while critiquing Intel in this article &#34;Intel: There Are No Tails Big Enough To Wag This Dog&#34;.</p><p>Here are four points to consider when deciding whether to invest in AMD or Intel.</p><p><b>1. Intel will likely spend more than $100 billion in building new fabs in the next five years.</b></p><p>Intel is known for its large CAPEX spending ($65 billion over the last five years) but as it moves deliberately into the chip manufacturing business, that number will become much larger.</p><p>The chip shortage has made many countries realize they cannot depend upon overseas sources, to make their chips anymore. And to make sure it doesn&#39;t happen again they are handing out billions to companies like Intel to make fabs in their country so that their manufacturers can have enough chips to keep their factories (and employees) working around the clock.</p><p>In the US the bi-partisan CHIPS Act has already passed the Senate allocating a total of $52 billion to new chip facilities built in the US(see here). I would think Intel would get a good share of that $52 billion.</p><p>Also on the docket is the FABS act which would grant 25% tax credits to companies building new fabs in the US.</p><p>And Italy and Intel are talking about a $9 billion plant investment.</p><ul><li>The talks between Intel and the Italian government over the U.S. chip giant building an advanced semiconductor packaging plant are &#34;intensifying,&#34; with a total package said to be worth more than 8 billion euros, or $9 billion,Reuters reported.</li></ul><p>In the meantime, Intel has announced it is spending $20 billion on two fabs in Arizona with the possibility of another $95 billion worth in Europe which Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger called &#34;big honkin’ fab&#34;. Big indeed.</p><p>All this leads one to think that in the near future Intel&#39;s business will be much less dependent on X86 proprietary chips and more as perhaps the most prominent semiconductor manufacturer in the world.</p><p>Why can Intel afford to invest so much in production? Since 2011, Intel&#39;s huge cash flow dwarfs AMD&#39;s by over $90 billion and that&#39;s after spending over $115 billion on CAPEX over the same time period.</p><p>This means at this point in their existence they are two very different companies with very different futures.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/aadddacb5a9fe2a359b2778b2cdedb84\" tg-width=\"267\" tg-height=\"315\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ebd02e5ce75709f7581621c8de162cd3\" tg-width=\"267\" tg-height=\"284\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p><b>2. Meanwhile, AMD continues to sub-contract its chip production to others.</b></p><p>AMD stopped making its own chips in 2008 when it sold its foundries to Global Foundries. Since then it has used both Global Foundries and Taiwan Semiconductor(NYSE:TSM). So basically, AMD has become a chip designer with production done by others. It has proven its adeptness at design by gaining market share in the X86 market vis a vis Intel.</p><p>However, that comparison can be somewhat deceiving since Intel&#39;s revenue has increased each year of the chart though AMD&#39;s revenue has grown much faster. Currently, Intel&#39;s revenue is still 5X AMD&#39;s.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e403a09a0c2853b8d2ca39ab0a1f2eca\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"498\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>Typically, one of the negatives of not making your own chips is lower margins as can be seen with this Intel/AMD margin comparison.</p><p>Although AMD is catching up, Intel still has a substantial margin advantage.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/58af9e78897a6086f70a4652e9a8cfc8\" tg-width=\"314\" tg-height=\"289\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p><b>3. Intel&#39;s IP (Intellectual Property) should give it an advantage in the chip-making market.</b></p><p>Intel has more than 60,000 patents total including thefifthmost in the world in 2020.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/035b675ed3bc1731244b14882ced742d\" tg-width=\"455\" tg-height=\"411\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>In fact, just in December 2021, Intel filed more than 170 patents with most of them having to do with process technology.</p><p>By offering to combine their proprietary technology with their customer&#39;s technology, Intel can offer better results for the same price.</p><p><b>4. The ARMy is coming for both Intel and AMD.</b></p><p>Many companies including Apple &#34;Apple May Build 40-Core ARM-Based Mac Pro, Plans 10-Core MacBook Pro&#34;, Google&#34; Google is designing its own Arm-based processors for 2023 Chromebooks&#34;, and Amazon&#34;Category: Graviton&#34;are going with ARM chips for their proprietary chip needs.</p><p>The advantage Intel has in the case of customers going to ARM is to fabricate those ARM chips in their fabs using their proprietary technology to make a superior product. With the huge number of fabs Intel is building they will also be able to provide better delivery times and volumes too.</p><p>AMD, on the other hand, will have to make their X86 even more superior than it is now and that will be no easy trick. They don&#39;t make their own chips so they can&#39;t possibly manufacture any chips for others.</p><p>AMD&#39;s customer base is very concentrated with the top five customers, including HP, Microsoft, and Sony, representing 54% of overall revenue and 70% of graphics revenue. It would be hard to imagine that those customers are not considering ARM for at least some of their chip requirements.</p><p><b>Conclusion: Is Intel or AMD Stock the Better Buy?</b></p><p>As the 50-year competition between Intel and AMD moves forward, big changes will be coming for both companies, but especially Intel.</p><p>Intel will become one of the biggest fabricators in the world while AMD continues its innovation success under Lisa Su. Intel is also moving on to other technology revenue sources such as autos with Mobileye and a new ARM competitor SiFive. SiFive has developed a RISC (Reduced Instruction Set Computer) that could replace ARM in phones as well as other devices.</p><p>Here&#39;s SiFive&#39;s CEO Patrick Little:</p><blockquote>&#34;By 2023, you&#39;re likely to see the first mobile phone with RISC-V,&#34; SiFive Chief Executive Patrick Little said in an October interview. &#34;I think we have an excellent shot at the phone.&#34;</blockquote><p>Source: MSN</p><p>If that does come true, the chips for both Mobileye and SiFive will be manufactured on one of Intel&#39;s fabs using both SiFive&#39;s and Intel&#39;s proprietary technology to take on ARM head to head.</p><p>Decades ago it looked like AMD founder Jerry Sanders was channeling the future, Lisa Su:</p><blockquote>&#34;We’re winning the fight, but they are a very formidable competitor. Intel has managed to put everybody else out of the business except us. So it&#39;s a two-man game right now. We&#39;re the challenger, they&#39;re the champion. But I think we&#39;ve got a great chance here to continue to gain market share.&#34;</blockquote><p>Exactly right I would say.</p><p>With a forward PE of 10 and a growing 3% dividend, Intel is a low-risk option on the rapidly accelerating chip-future of the world regardless of the task at hand. AMD, with a PE of 55, is certainly riskier but has proven itself to be more than competitive over the last five years. Never count Lisa Su and AMD out.</p><p>In my opinion, Intel is the better choice for the next five years because of its unique ability to expand fabs worldwide and its rather mundane expectations, and very modest PE ratio.</p><p>Intel is a buy if you have a five-year plan.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>AMD Vs. Intel Stock: Which Is The Better Buy For 2025?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAMD Vs. Intel Stock: Which Is The Better Buy For 2025?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-01-05 11:07 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4477879-amd-vs-intel-stock-better-buy-2025><strong>Seeking Alpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>SummaryIntel will likely spend more than $100 billion in building new fabs in the next 5 years.Meanwhile, AMD continues to sub-contract its chip production to others.Intel's IP (Intellectual Property)...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4477879-amd-vs-intel-stock-better-buy-2025\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"INTC":"英特尔","AMD":"美国超微公司"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4477879-amd-vs-intel-stock-better-buy-2025","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1194155159","content_text":"SummaryIntel will likely spend more than $100 billion in building new fabs in the next 5 years.Meanwhile, AMD continues to sub-contract its chip production to others.Intel's IP (Intellectual Property) should give it an advantage in the chip-making market.The ARMy is coming for both Intel and AMD.sefa ozel/E+ via Getty ImagesIntel(NASDAQ:INTC) and AMD(NASDAQ:AMD) have been competitors for more than 50 years. Both were founded by former Fairchild Semiconductor International engineers, Intel in 1968 by Gordon Moore, and AMD in 1969 by Jerry Sanders.Fast forward to the 21st century and Intel dominated for the first 15 years, but AMD has made huge progress in the last five years and is now considered by many to be the superior technical innovator of X86 CPUs.But as we look forward to the next five years, who will dominate? I would argue that the future will be much different than the past with the competitive situation between the two still prominent but the overall businesses themselves will diverge significantly by 2025.I have written over 50 articles on the two companies and have been especially praiseworthy of AMD and its uber-CEO, Lisa Su. But over the next five years and beyond, I see less direct technical competition as Intel massively diversifies into the chip manufacturing business as well as maintaining its traditional CPU market.In 2018 I wrote this about AMD and the management skills shown by its new CEO Lisa Su \"AMD: 5 Reasons The Shorts Will Be Changing Their Shorts Shortly\" while critiquing Intel in this article \"Intel: There Are No Tails Big Enough To Wag This Dog\".Here are four points to consider when deciding whether to invest in AMD or Intel.1. Intel will likely spend more than $100 billion in building new fabs in the next five years.Intel is known for its large CAPEX spending ($65 billion over the last five years) but as it moves deliberately into the chip manufacturing business, that number will become much larger.The chip shortage has made many countries realize they cannot depend upon overseas sources, to make their chips anymore. And to make sure it doesn't happen again they are handing out billions to companies like Intel to make fabs in their country so that their manufacturers can have enough chips to keep their factories (and employees) working around the clock.In the US the bi-partisan CHIPS Act has already passed the Senate allocating a total of $52 billion to new chip facilities built in the US(see here). I would think Intel would get a good share of that $52 billion.Also on the docket is the FABS act which would grant 25% tax credits to companies building new fabs in the US.And Italy and Intel are talking about a $9 billion plant investment.The talks between Intel and the Italian government over the U.S. chip giant building an advanced semiconductor packaging plant are \"intensifying,\" with a total package said to be worth more than 8 billion euros, or $9 billion,Reuters reported.In the meantime, Intel has announced it is spending $20 billion on two fabs in Arizona with the possibility of another $95 billion worth in Europe which Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger called \"big honkin’ fab\". Big indeed.All this leads one to think that in the near future Intel's business will be much less dependent on X86 proprietary chips and more as perhaps the most prominent semiconductor manufacturer in the world.Why can Intel afford to invest so much in production? Since 2011, Intel's huge cash flow dwarfs AMD's by over $90 billion and that's after spending over $115 billion on CAPEX over the same time period.This means at this point in their existence they are two very different companies with very different futures.2. Meanwhile, AMD continues to sub-contract its chip production to others.AMD stopped making its own chips in 2008 when it sold its foundries to Global Foundries. Since then it has used both Global Foundries and Taiwan Semiconductor(NYSE:TSM). So basically, AMD has become a chip designer with production done by others. It has proven its adeptness at design by gaining market share in the X86 market vis a vis Intel.However, that comparison can be somewhat deceiving since Intel's revenue has increased each year of the chart though AMD's revenue has grown much faster. Currently, Intel's revenue is still 5X AMD's.Typically, one of the negatives of not making your own chips is lower margins as can be seen with this Intel/AMD margin comparison.Although AMD is catching up, Intel still has a substantial margin advantage.3. Intel's IP (Intellectual Property) should give it an advantage in the chip-making market.Intel has more than 60,000 patents total including thefifthmost in the world in 2020.In fact, just in December 2021, Intel filed more than 170 patents with most of them having to do with process technology.By offering to combine their proprietary technology with their customer's technology, Intel can offer better results for the same price.4. The ARMy is coming for both Intel and AMD.Many companies including Apple \"Apple May Build 40-Core ARM-Based Mac Pro, Plans 10-Core MacBook Pro\", Google\" Google is designing its own Arm-based processors for 2023 Chromebooks\", and Amazon\"Category: Graviton\"are going with ARM chips for their proprietary chip needs.The advantage Intel has in the case of customers going to ARM is to fabricate those ARM chips in their fabs using their proprietary technology to make a superior product. With the huge number of fabs Intel is building they will also be able to provide better delivery times and volumes too.AMD, on the other hand, will have to make their X86 even more superior than it is now and that will be no easy trick. They don't make their own chips so they can't possibly manufacture any chips for others.AMD's customer base is very concentrated with the top five customers, including HP, Microsoft, and Sony, representing 54% of overall revenue and 70% of graphics revenue. It would be hard to imagine that those customers are not considering ARM for at least some of their chip requirements.Conclusion: Is Intel or AMD Stock the Better Buy?As the 50-year competition between Intel and AMD moves forward, big changes will be coming for both companies, but especially Intel.Intel will become one of the biggest fabricators in the world while AMD continues its innovation success under Lisa Su. Intel is also moving on to other technology revenue sources such as autos with Mobileye and a new ARM competitor SiFive. SiFive has developed a RISC (Reduced Instruction Set Computer) that could replace ARM in phones as well as other devices.Here's SiFive's CEO Patrick Little:\"By 2023, you're likely to see the first mobile phone with RISC-V,\" SiFive Chief Executive Patrick Little said in an October interview. \"I think we have an excellent shot at the phone.\"Source: MSNIf that does come true, the chips for both Mobileye and SiFive will be manufactured on one of Intel's fabs using both SiFive's and Intel's proprietary technology to take on ARM head to head.Decades ago it looked like AMD founder Jerry Sanders was channeling the future, Lisa Su:\"We’re winning the fight, but they are a very formidable competitor. Intel has managed to put everybody else out of the business except us. So it's a two-man game right now. We're the challenger, they're the champion. But I think we've got a great chance here to continue to gain market share.\"Exactly right I would say.With a forward PE of 10 and a growing 3% dividend, Intel is a low-risk option on the rapidly accelerating chip-future of the world regardless of the task at hand. AMD, with a PE of 55, is certainly riskier but has proven itself to be more than competitive over the last five years. Never count Lisa Su and AMD out.In my opinion, Intel is the better choice for the next five years because of its unique ability to expand fabs worldwide and its rather mundane expectations, and very modest PE ratio.Intel is a buy if you have a five-year plan.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":887,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9001085733,"gmtCreate":1641104441323,"gmtModify":1676533573022,"author":{"id":"3562919640401993","authorId":"3562919640401993","name":"Jiangbox","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7379f7108480b709cc9a6a874592f0ae","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3562919640401993","authorIdStr":"3562919640401993"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Can buy?","listText":"Can buy?","text":"Can buy?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9001085733","repostId":"2200444738","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2200444738","pubTimestamp":1641099600,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2200444738?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-01-02 13:00","market":"us","language":"en","title":"If I Could Buy Only 1 Stock in 2022, This Would Be It","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2200444738","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Our favorite stock picks for the coming year.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>We&#39;re firm believers in the benefit of owning a diversified portfolio of stocks. However, we all have our favorite stocks.</p><p>We asked some of our Fool.com contributors to whittle their favorites down to their top choice to buy in 2022 if they could only pick <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a>. Here&#39;s why <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MMM\">3M</a></b> (NYSE:MMM), <b>Brookfield Asset Management </b>(NYSE:BAM), and <b>Brookfield Renewable</b> (NYSE:BEP)(NYSE:BEPC) topped their lists as the one stock they&#39;d buy this year. </p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a909bb3cfb7abaedc74cfef9296edc0a\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"423\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>Image source: Getty Images.</span></p><h2>A diversified giant that&#39;s still on sale</h2><p><b>Reuben Gregg Brewer (3M):</b> Benjamin Graham, renowned value investor and mentor to Warren Buffet, explains that investors are partnered with &#34;Mr. Market,&#34; a mercurial fellow prone to fits of despair and jubilation. When he&#39;s overly excited, you should consider selling to him; when he&#39;s pessimistic, you should think about buying. Right now, Mr. Market is very downbeat on diversified international industrial giant 3M. One way to see this is that the company&#39;s dividend yield, at around 3.3%, is near the top end of its historical range.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/35404c30dd22bffd6cc4a1450aa485c9\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"433\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>MMM Dividend Yield data by YCharts</span></p><p>Graham had some other advice when it came to actually selecting stocks. Specifically, he argued that most investors would be wise sticking to large, financially strong companies, with strong dividend histories. 3M stacks up well on these measures. It has a market cap of $100 billion, which makes it a mega-cap stock. Its balance sheet is investment-grade rated by the major credit agencies, so it&#39;s financially strong. And it has increased its dividend annually for over 60 years, making it a very elite Dividend King.</p><p>So why is Mr. Market pessimistic? The answer is a mixture of slowing growth and some product and environmental lawsuits. These are notable problems, but they&#39;re not insurmountable. On the business front, the industrial giant&#39;s operations wax and wane over time just like any other company. Given its history and focus on innovation, it should eventually get back on a better track. As for the lawsuits, they could be costly, but it&#39;s likely that 3M will be able to handle the hit. In the end, this is an attractively priced name with a great history that is dealing with issues that seem transitory.</p><h2>A proven value creator</h2><p><b>Matt DiLallo (Brookfield Asset Management):</b> I like to invest. Because of that, I routinely purchase a variety of stocks. However, if I could only buy one in the coming year, Brookfield Asset Management would be my top choice.</p><p>For starters, I love the company&#39;s management. CEO Bruce Flatt is a personal favorite of mine. He&#39;s right up there with Warren Buffett in my book as one of the best value investors around. I enjoy reading his quarterly letter to shareholders, which Flatt fills with investing and economic insight. He&#39;s also a proven value creator. Since becoming CEO in 2002, he&#39;s helped Brookfield deliver a 15.7% total annualized return, pulverizing the <b>S&amp;P 500</b>&#39;s 10.6% total return during that time frame. </p><p>I also like the company&#39;s business model. Brookfield is a leading global alternative asset manager focused on real estate, infrastructure, and renewable energy -- three of my favorite investing themes. An investment in Brookfield provides broad exposure to those three asset classes and many more. Brookfield invests directly across those themes and manages private equity funds focused on those sectors.</p><p>Finally, Brookfield has enormous upside potential. It expects to double its fee-bearing assets under management over the next five years. Combine that with performance-based earnings on its funds and the compounding value of its balance sheet investments, and it has the potential of generating up to 25% annualized total returns over the next five years. That upside, along with all the other positives, is why I&#39;d buy Brookfield if it were the only stock I could purchase this year. </p><h2>Investors are overlooking the growth potential here</h2><p><b>Neha Chamaria</b> <b>(Brookfield Renewable)</b>: 2021 is turning out to be a record-setting year for global renewable electricity addition, but this could just be the beginning. Yet shares of one of the largest pure-play renewables companies that&#39;s growing at a steady pace have languished this year, which is why Brookfield Renewable would be at the top of my shopping list of stocks to buy in 2022.</p><p>Brookfield Renewable, in fact, generated record funds from operations (FFO) in its third quarter and believes it could grow FFO by nearly 20% per year through 2026 through a combination of organic and inorganic growth. 2021 was also a solid year in terms of growth initiatives, with Brookfield Renewable expanding its U.S. distributed-generation business by nearly five times, signing agreements to acquire multiple late-stage solar development projects in the U.S. and even making meaningful headway in the high-potential green hydrogen space.</p><p>Brookfield Renewable&#39;s current development pipeline is larger than ever, and the company is committed to growing dividends annually by 5% to 9%. That shouldn&#39;t be tough given the solid pace of growth in its FFO. That dividend growth, its dividend yield of 3.4%, and the humongous growth potential in renewable energy are the biggest reasons why I consider Brookfield Renewable a top stock for 2022.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>If I Could Buy Only 1 Stock in 2022, This Would Be It</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nIf I Could Buy Only 1 Stock in 2022, This Would Be It\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-01-02 13:00 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/01/01/if-i-could-buy-only-1-stock-in-2022-this-would-be/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>We're firm believers in the benefit of owning a diversified portfolio of stocks. However, we all have our favorite stocks.We asked some of our Fool.com contributors to whittle their favorites down to ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/01/01/if-i-could-buy-only-1-stock-in-2022-this-would-be/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BK4135":"资产管理与托管银行","BK4206":"工业集团企业","BEPC":"Brookfield Renewable Corp.","MMM":"3M","BAM":"布鲁克菲尔德资产管理","BEP":"Brookfield Renewable Partners LP","BK4133":"新能源发电业者","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","BK4512":"苹果概念","BK4533":"AQR资本管理(全球第二大对冲基金)"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/01/01/if-i-could-buy-only-1-stock-in-2022-this-would-be/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2200444738","content_text":"We're firm believers in the benefit of owning a diversified portfolio of stocks. However, we all have our favorite stocks.We asked some of our Fool.com contributors to whittle their favorites down to their top choice to buy in 2022 if they could only pick one. Here's why 3M (NYSE:MMM), Brookfield Asset Management (NYSE:BAM), and Brookfield Renewable (NYSE:BEP)(NYSE:BEPC) topped their lists as the one stock they'd buy this year. Image source: Getty Images.A diversified giant that's still on saleReuben Gregg Brewer (3M): Benjamin Graham, renowned value investor and mentor to Warren Buffet, explains that investors are partnered with \"Mr. Market,\" a mercurial fellow prone to fits of despair and jubilation. When he's overly excited, you should consider selling to him; when he's pessimistic, you should think about buying. Right now, Mr. Market is very downbeat on diversified international industrial giant 3M. One way to see this is that the company's dividend yield, at around 3.3%, is near the top end of its historical range.MMM Dividend Yield data by YChartsGraham had some other advice when it came to actually selecting stocks. Specifically, he argued that most investors would be wise sticking to large, financially strong companies, with strong dividend histories. 3M stacks up well on these measures. It has a market cap of $100 billion, which makes it a mega-cap stock. Its balance sheet is investment-grade rated by the major credit agencies, so it's financially strong. And it has increased its dividend annually for over 60 years, making it a very elite Dividend King.So why is Mr. Market pessimistic? The answer is a mixture of slowing growth and some product and environmental lawsuits. These are notable problems, but they're not insurmountable. On the business front, the industrial giant's operations wax and wane over time just like any other company. Given its history and focus on innovation, it should eventually get back on a better track. As for the lawsuits, they could be costly, but it's likely that 3M will be able to handle the hit. In the end, this is an attractively priced name with a great history that is dealing with issues that seem transitory.A proven value creatorMatt DiLallo (Brookfield Asset Management): I like to invest. Because of that, I routinely purchase a variety of stocks. However, if I could only buy one in the coming year, Brookfield Asset Management would be my top choice.For starters, I love the company's management. CEO Bruce Flatt is a personal favorite of mine. He's right up there with Warren Buffett in my book as one of the best value investors around. I enjoy reading his quarterly letter to shareholders, which Flatt fills with investing and economic insight. He's also a proven value creator. Since becoming CEO in 2002, he's helped Brookfield deliver a 15.7% total annualized return, pulverizing the S&P 500's 10.6% total return during that time frame. I also like the company's business model. Brookfield is a leading global alternative asset manager focused on real estate, infrastructure, and renewable energy -- three of my favorite investing themes. An investment in Brookfield provides broad exposure to those three asset classes and many more. Brookfield invests directly across those themes and manages private equity funds focused on those sectors.Finally, Brookfield has enormous upside potential. It expects to double its fee-bearing assets under management over the next five years. Combine that with performance-based earnings on its funds and the compounding value of its balance sheet investments, and it has the potential of generating up to 25% annualized total returns over the next five years. That upside, along with all the other positives, is why I'd buy Brookfield if it were the only stock I could purchase this year. Investors are overlooking the growth potential hereNeha Chamaria (Brookfield Renewable): 2021 is turning out to be a record-setting year for global renewable electricity addition, but this could just be the beginning. Yet shares of one of the largest pure-play renewables companies that's growing at a steady pace have languished this year, which is why Brookfield Renewable would be at the top of my shopping list of stocks to buy in 2022.Brookfield Renewable, in fact, generated record funds from operations (FFO) in its third quarter and believes it could grow FFO by nearly 20% per year through 2026 through a combination of organic and inorganic growth. 2021 was also a solid year in terms of growth initiatives, with Brookfield Renewable expanding its U.S. distributed-generation business by nearly five times, signing agreements to acquire multiple late-stage solar development projects in the U.S. and even making meaningful headway in the high-potential green hydrogen space.Brookfield Renewable's current development pipeline is larger than ever, and the company is committed to growing dividends annually by 5% to 9%. That shouldn't be tough given the solid pace of growth in its FFO. That dividend growth, its dividend yield of 3.4%, and the humongous growth potential in renewable energy are the biggest reasons why I consider Brookfield Renewable a top stock for 2022.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":473,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9003229578,"gmtCreate":1641000934805,"gmtModify":1676533562147,"author":{"id":"3562919640401993","authorId":"3562919640401993","name":"Jiangbox","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7379f7108480b709cc9a6a874592f0ae","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3562919640401993","authorIdStr":"3562919640401993"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Up more.","listText":"Up more.","text":"Up more.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9003229578","repostId":"1114332157","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":380,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9003220243,"gmtCreate":1641000809611,"gmtModify":1676533562116,"author":{"id":"3562919640401993","authorId":"3562919640401993","name":"Jiangbox","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7379f7108480b709cc9a6a874592f0ae","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3562919640401993","authorIdStr":"3562919640401993"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Up more.","listText":"Up more.","text":"Up more.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9003220243","repostId":"2200744536","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2200744536","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1640998320,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2200744536?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-01-01 08:52","market":"us","language":"en","title":"What Happens When the S&P 500 Climbs More Than 25% in a Year? This Chart Shows Midteen Gains Usually Follow","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2200744536","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"No doubt, 2021 has been a stellar year for U.S. stocks.The S&P 500 index  is headed for a stellar 27","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>No doubt, 2021 has been a stellar year for U.S. stocks.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 index  is headed for a stellar 27% annual gain as of Friday, the last day of trade in a year when highly transmissible coronavirus variants have kept the pandemic at the forefront.</p><p>But while such outsized stock-market gains have been fairly rare in the past 70 years, past performance shows that 2022 still could be a robust year for returns, according to a review of historical S&amp;P 500 performance by Truist Advisory Services.</p><p>Indeed, Keith Lerner, co-chief investment officer at Truist, found the S&amp;P 500 has produced at least 25% annual returns (including dividends), only 18 times since 1950. But in the following year, the broad-based index rose 82% of the time, notching average annual gains of 14% (see chart).</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7ece307d4b24390174454721a37fcabf\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"316\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>S&amp;P 500 notched 25%+ annual returns only 18 times since 1950 Truist Advisory Services</span></p><p>&#34;Two(T of the three years where stocks failed to rise, 1981 and 1990, coincided with recessions,&#34; Lerner wrote, in a Friday client note. &#34;Our work suggests near-term recession risk remains low.&#34;</p><p>&#34;The other downside market outlier was 1962, which was challenged by a flash crash and deteriorating investor confidence,&#34; Lerner wrote.</p><p>The coming year will kick off with Federal Reserve monetary policies that remain highly accommodative for financial assets, at least in its first few months. Pandemic support by central banks has been credited with underpinning the global economic recovery, while keeping credit flowing, but also pushing up asset prices to sometimes worrying levels.</p><p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average  was poised for a 19% annual gain for 2021, while the Nasdaq Composite Index  advanced about 22%, according to FactSet.</p><p>Fed Chairman Jerome Powell outlined plans in December to more aggressively reduce the central bank&#39;s hallmark $120 billion in monthly pandemic bond purchases, in a bid to combat inflation that&#39;s touched 1980s levels. It is targeting March as a potential end date for the program, after about two years. The Fed also penciled in three rated hikes in 2022.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>What Happens When the S&P 500 Climbs More Than 25% in a Year? This Chart Shows Midteen Gains Usually Follow</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhat Happens When the S&P 500 Climbs More Than 25% in a Year? This Chart Shows Midteen Gains Usually Follow\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-01-01 08:52</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>No doubt, 2021 has been a stellar year for U.S. stocks.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 index  is headed for a stellar 27% annual gain as of Friday, the last day of trade in a year when highly transmissible coronavirus variants have kept the pandemic at the forefront.</p><p>But while such outsized stock-market gains have been fairly rare in the past 70 years, past performance shows that 2022 still could be a robust year for returns, according to a review of historical S&amp;P 500 performance by Truist Advisory Services.</p><p>Indeed, Keith Lerner, co-chief investment officer at Truist, found the S&amp;P 500 has produced at least 25% annual returns (including dividends), only 18 times since 1950. But in the following year, the broad-based index rose 82% of the time, notching average annual gains of 14% (see chart).</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7ece307d4b24390174454721a37fcabf\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"316\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>S&amp;P 500 notched 25%+ annual returns only 18 times since 1950 Truist Advisory Services</span></p><p>&#34;Two(T of the three years where stocks failed to rise, 1981 and 1990, coincided with recessions,&#34; Lerner wrote, in a Friday client note. &#34;Our work suggests near-term recession risk remains low.&#34;</p><p>&#34;The other downside market outlier was 1962, which was challenged by a flash crash and deteriorating investor confidence,&#34; Lerner wrote.</p><p>The coming year will kick off with Federal Reserve monetary policies that remain highly accommodative for financial assets, at least in its first few months. Pandemic support by central banks has been credited with underpinning the global economic recovery, while keeping credit flowing, but also pushing up asset prices to sometimes worrying levels.</p><p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average  was poised for a 19% annual gain for 2021, while the Nasdaq Composite Index  advanced about 22%, according to FactSet.</p><p>Fed Chairman Jerome Powell outlined plans in December to more aggressively reduce the central bank&#39;s hallmark $120 billion in monthly pandemic bond purchases, in a bid to combat inflation that&#39;s touched 1980s levels. It is targeting March as a potential end date for the program, after about two years. The Fed also penciled in three rated hikes in 2022.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","BK4559":"巴菲特持仓","SPY":"标普500ETF",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓","BK4504":"桥水持仓"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2200744536","content_text":"No doubt, 2021 has been a stellar year for U.S. stocks.The S&P 500 index  is headed for a stellar 27% annual gain as of Friday, the last day of trade in a year when highly transmissible coronavirus variants have kept the pandemic at the forefront.But while such outsized stock-market gains have been fairly rare in the past 70 years, past performance shows that 2022 still could be a robust year for returns, according to a review of historical S&P 500 performance by Truist Advisory Services.Indeed, Keith Lerner, co-chief investment officer at Truist, found the S&P 500 has produced at least 25% annual returns (including dividends), only 18 times since 1950. But in the following year, the broad-based index rose 82% of the time, notching average annual gains of 14% (see chart).S&P 500 notched 25%+ annual returns only 18 times since 1950 Truist Advisory Services\"Two(T of the three years where stocks failed to rise, 1981 and 1990, coincided with recessions,\" Lerner wrote, in a Friday client note. \"Our work suggests near-term recession risk remains low.\"\"The other downside market outlier was 1962, which was challenged by a flash crash and deteriorating investor confidence,\" Lerner wrote.The coming year will kick off with Federal Reserve monetary policies that remain highly accommodative for financial assets, at least in its first few months. Pandemic support by central banks has been credited with underpinning the global economic recovery, while keeping credit flowing, but also pushing up asset prices to sometimes worrying levels.The Dow Jones Industrial Average  was poised for a 19% annual gain for 2021, while the Nasdaq Composite Index  advanced about 22%, according to FactSet.Fed Chairman Jerome Powell outlined plans in December to more aggressively reduce the central bank's hallmark $120 billion in monthly pandemic bond purchases, in a bid to combat inflation that's touched 1980s levels. It is targeting March as a potential end date for the program, after about two years. The Fed also penciled in three rated hikes in 2022.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":306,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9003013303,"gmtCreate":1640824074354,"gmtModify":1676533544748,"author":{"id":"3562919640401993","authorId":"3562919640401993","name":"Jiangbox","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7379f7108480b709cc9a6a874592f0ae","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3562919640401993","authorIdStr":"3562919640401993"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Die","listText":"Die","text":"Die","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9003013303","repostId":"1131821136","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":521,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9003013911,"gmtCreate":1640824059579,"gmtModify":1676533544748,"author":{"id":"3562919640401993","authorId":"3562919640401993","name":"Jiangbox","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7379f7108480b709cc9a6a874592f0ae","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3562919640401993","authorIdStr":"3562919640401993"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Die","listText":"Die","text":"Die","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9003013911","repostId":"1131821136","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1131821136","pubTimestamp":1640822086,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1131821136?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-12-30 07:54","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Naked Brands Stock Bounces Sharply Higher after Post-Split Tumble","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1131821136","media":"seekingalpha","summary":"Naked Brands(NASDAQ:NAKD)+16%is rebounding today after five-straight losing sessions, with selling a","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Naked Brands(NASDAQ:NAKD)+16%is rebounding today after five-straight losing sessions, with selling accelerating after a reverse stock split a week ago.</p><p>Shares were down more than 30% after the stock split 1:15 on Dec. 22.</p><p>The one-time meme stock that appeared on Robinhood&#39;s limit list is down 50% in the last six months, but still up more than 70% year to date.</p><p>Naked Brands (NAKD) entered into a merger agreement with EV maker Cenntro Automotive in August.</p><p>&#34;With the working capital injection from the merger with Naked Brand, and the market demand for our vehicles, we are confident that we will meet our production guidance of 20K vehicles next year. We are well positioned for accelerated growth in 2022 and beyond,&#34; Cenntro&#39;s Chairman and CEO Peter Wangsaid on Monday.</p><p>&#34;Even though Naked isn&#39;t technically a SPAC, the story here seems like so many beaten-down SPACs at the moment,&#34; SA contributor Vince Martin writes in his assessment of NAKD for 2022. &#34;The opportunity is still there, and the price is cheaper - but the sell-off seems to have some logic behind it.&#34;</p><p>&#34;In this case, it was the collapse of the &#39;meme stock&#39; momentum behind NAKD, which crushed the premium to cash the market was assigning the stock.&#34;</p></body></html>","source":"seekingalpha","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Naked Brands Stock Bounces Sharply Higher after Post-Split Tumble</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nNaked Brands Stock Bounces Sharply Higher after Post-Split Tumble\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-12-30 07:54 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/news/3783999-naked-brands-stock-bounces-sharply-higher-after-post-split-tumble><strong>seekingalpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Naked Brands(NASDAQ:NAKD)+16%is rebounding today after five-straight losing sessions, with selling accelerating after a reverse stock split a week ago.Shares were down more than 30% after the stock ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/news/3783999-naked-brands-stock-bounces-sharply-higher-after-post-split-tumble\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/news/3783999-naked-brands-stock-bounces-sharply-higher-after-post-split-tumble","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5a36db9d73b4222bc376d24ccc48c8a4","article_id":"1131821136","content_text":"Naked Brands(NASDAQ:NAKD)+16%is rebounding today after five-straight losing sessions, with selling accelerating after a reverse stock split a week ago.Shares were down more than 30% after the stock split 1:15 on Dec. 22.The one-time meme stock that appeared on Robinhood's limit list is down 50% in the last six months, but still up more than 70% year to date.Naked Brands (NAKD) entered into a merger agreement with EV maker Cenntro Automotive in August.\"With the working capital injection from the merger with Naked Brand, and the market demand for our vehicles, we are confident that we will meet our production guidance of 20K vehicles next year. We are well positioned for accelerated growth in 2022 and beyond,\" Cenntro's Chairman and CEO Peter Wangsaid on Monday.\"Even though Naked isn't technically a SPAC, the story here seems like so many beaten-down SPACs at the moment,\" SA contributor Vince Martin writes in his assessment of NAKD for 2022. \"The opportunity is still there, and the price is cheaper - but the sell-off seems to have some logic behind it.\"\"In this case, it was the collapse of the 'meme stock' momentum behind NAKD, which crushed the premium to cash the market was assigning the stock.\"","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":301,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":832717743,"gmtCreate":1629678201282,"gmtModify":1676530092255,"author":{"id":"3562919640401993","authorId":"3562919640401993","name":"Jiangbox","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7379f7108480b709cc9a6a874592f0ae","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3562919640401993","authorIdStr":"3562919640401993"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Buy on dips.","listText":"Buy on dips.","text":"Buy on dips.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/832717743","repostId":"2161479357","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":627,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":129023751,"gmtCreate":1624345889273,"gmtModify":1703834050664,"author":{"id":"3562919640401993","authorId":"3562919640401993","name":"Jiangbox","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7379f7108480b709cc9a6a874592f0ae","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3562919640401993","authorIdStr":"3562919640401993"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Bitcoin is going to drop to below 20k soon.","listText":"Bitcoin is going to drop to below 20k soon.","text":"Bitcoin is going to drop to below 20k soon.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/129023751","repostId":"2145031916","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2145031916","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1624343820,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2145031916?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-22 14:37","market":"hk","language":"en","title":"After China causes bitcoin to crater, threat of new U.S. regulations loom over crypto market, experts say","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2145031916","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"Bitcoin's dollar price falls more than 10% Monday.\n\nThe world's most popular cryptocurrencies took i","content":"<blockquote>\n Bitcoin's dollar price falls more than 10% Monday.\n</blockquote>\n<p>The world's most popular cryptocurrencies took it on the chin Monday after the Chinese government continued its regulatory crackdown on bitcoin miners and companies that provide payment services for crypto-related transactions.</p>\n<p>The People's Bank of China said in a notice Monday that \"virtual currency trading activities disrupt the normal economic and financial orders, breed the risks of illegal cross-border transfer of assets, money laundering and other illegal and criminal activities, and seriously infringe the people's property safety.\"</p>\n<p>The central bank's statement came a day after the regional Chinese government in Sichuan announced it would close more than two dozen suspected cryptocurrency-mining operations in the hydroelectricity-rich region.</p>\n<p>The dollar price of bitcoin tumbled roughly 11% early Monday morning before paring those losses slightly. Ether was trading 13% lower Monday afternoon , while dogecoin was down about 25%.</p>\n<p>The moves underscore the influence that large governments, like China and the U.S., hold over the price of bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies, experts say.</p>\n<p>Famed author, mathematician and investor Nassim Nicholas Taleb on Sunday published a paper critical of bitcoin enthusiasts, who he said seriously underestimate the threat that government power poses to cryptocurrencies.</p>\n<p>\"By its very nature, bitcoin is open for all to see,\" he wrote, referencing the pseudonymous, rather than anonymous, nature of bitcoin. \"The belief in <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE\">one</a>'s ability to hide <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a>'s assets from the government with a public blockchain...not just read by the FBI but by people in their living room, requires a certain lack of financial seasoning and statistical understanding -- perhaps even simple common sense.\"</p>\n<p>Meanwhile, regulators are clearly signaling they will continue to enact more regulations on the cryptosphere, including new rules that would hold exchanges and banks to stricter know-your-customer and anti-money-laundering regulations.</p>\n<p>Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman Gary Gensler has repeatedly discussed the need for greater regulation of crypto exchanges to protect investors, while saying that he considers many of the thousands of extant cryptocurrencies trading on exchanges to be unregistered securities that are subject to SEC enforcement actions.</p>\n<p>Sarah Brennan, an attorney at the law firm Harter Secrest &amp; Emery, told MarketWatch that bolder enforcement against cryptocurrency firms that are selling unregistered securities is a major risk for her clients.</p>\n<p>\"It's frustrating to work in this space because you don't have clarity on a lot of things,\" she said, adding that she was surprised that the SEC wasn't bringing more enforcement actions against cryptocurrency companies that have raised money through auctioning their tokens, which often violates federal rules. \"But the SEC has been...really mum on their agenda and their enforcement priorities,\" she added.</p>\n<p>Indeed, earlier this month the regulator released a rule-making agenda outlining its priorities for the coming year, and any planned rule-making on cryptocurrencies appears to have taken a back seat to the regulator's other priorities, including new disclosure rules on climate-change risk.</p>\n<p>Stablecoin regulation is perhaps the largest threat to the broader cryptocurrency market, experts say. A stablecoin is a kind of virtual currency that aims to maintain a peg to a stable asset, like the U.S. dollar , which facilitates trading from one cryptocurrency to another.</p>\n<p>Many critics say the growth of stablecoins like Tether, USD Coin, and DAI, pose significant risks to financial stability, especially after it has been revealed that some of these dollar-pegged tokens are not backed by actual U.S. dollars, but a combination of much riskier assets. In February, the New York State Attorney General Letitia James banned the use of Tethe r and an associated crypto exchange, Bitfinex, in the state.</p>\n<p>Following a settlement of the investigation, Tether revealed that the currency was not backed one-to-one by U.S. dollar reserves, but largely by short-term loans at the time that \"Under the terms of the settlement, we admit no wrongdoing. The settlement amount we have agreed to pay to the Attorney General's Office should be viewed as a measure of our desire to put this matter behind us and focus on our business.\"</p>\n<p>Tim Swanson, founder of the tech advisory Frim Post Oak labs, wrote in January that stablecoins were \"parasitic\" because they operated just like \"non-bank financial intermediaries that provide services similar to traditional commercial banks, but outside normal banking regulation.\"</p>\n<p>This kind of behavior puts not only stablecoin holders at risk but could potentially threaten financial stability in general, if a run on a stablecoin causes the asset and other cryptocurrency prices to collapse, he argued. Given that more than 75% of bitcoin trading is done in Tether, such a collapse could also disrupt the market for bitcoin and other popular cryptocurrencies, according to crypto services company FlowBank.</p>\n<p>Which regulator will step up to address these issues remains unknown, according to Brennan, who argued that federal bank regulators, securities regulators and state regulators have overlapping jurisdiction over cryptocurrencies and that this has been complicated by the fact that President Joe Biden has yet to nominate someone to run the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, which oversees national banks.</p>\n<p>\"There will be a regulatory slap fight here, and the SEC and the Commodities Futures Trading Commission haven't scrambled to say 'this is ours,'\" she said. \"Congress or federal bank regulators will have to come in to address the underlying issues with stablecoins from a market stability and safety perspective, to ensure that issuers have internal control and disclosure obligations and aren't going to just collapse and cause market instability.\"</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>After China causes bitcoin to crater, threat of new U.S. regulations loom over crypto market, experts say</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAfter China causes bitcoin to crater, threat of new U.S. regulations loom over crypto market, experts say\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-06-22 14:37</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<blockquote>\n Bitcoin's dollar price falls more than 10% Monday.\n</blockquote>\n<p>The world's most popular cryptocurrencies took it on the chin Monday after the Chinese government continued its regulatory crackdown on bitcoin miners and companies that provide payment services for crypto-related transactions.</p>\n<p>The People's Bank of China said in a notice Monday that \"virtual currency trading activities disrupt the normal economic and financial orders, breed the risks of illegal cross-border transfer of assets, money laundering and other illegal and criminal activities, and seriously infringe the people's property safety.\"</p>\n<p>The central bank's statement came a day after the regional Chinese government in Sichuan announced it would close more than two dozen suspected cryptocurrency-mining operations in the hydroelectricity-rich region.</p>\n<p>The dollar price of bitcoin tumbled roughly 11% early Monday morning before paring those losses slightly. Ether was trading 13% lower Monday afternoon , while dogecoin was down about 25%.</p>\n<p>The moves underscore the influence that large governments, like China and the U.S., hold over the price of bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies, experts say.</p>\n<p>Famed author, mathematician and investor Nassim Nicholas Taleb on Sunday published a paper critical of bitcoin enthusiasts, who he said seriously underestimate the threat that government power poses to cryptocurrencies.</p>\n<p>\"By its very nature, bitcoin is open for all to see,\" he wrote, referencing the pseudonymous, rather than anonymous, nature of bitcoin. \"The belief in <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE\">one</a>'s ability to hide <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a>'s assets from the government with a public blockchain...not just read by the FBI but by people in their living room, requires a certain lack of financial seasoning and statistical understanding -- perhaps even simple common sense.\"</p>\n<p>Meanwhile, regulators are clearly signaling they will continue to enact more regulations on the cryptosphere, including new rules that would hold exchanges and banks to stricter know-your-customer and anti-money-laundering regulations.</p>\n<p>Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman Gary Gensler has repeatedly discussed the need for greater regulation of crypto exchanges to protect investors, while saying that he considers many of the thousands of extant cryptocurrencies trading on exchanges to be unregistered securities that are subject to SEC enforcement actions.</p>\n<p>Sarah Brennan, an attorney at the law firm Harter Secrest &amp; Emery, told MarketWatch that bolder enforcement against cryptocurrency firms that are selling unregistered securities is a major risk for her clients.</p>\n<p>\"It's frustrating to work in this space because you don't have clarity on a lot of things,\" she said, adding that she was surprised that the SEC wasn't bringing more enforcement actions against cryptocurrency companies that have raised money through auctioning their tokens, which often violates federal rules. \"But the SEC has been...really mum on their agenda and their enforcement priorities,\" she added.</p>\n<p>Indeed, earlier this month the regulator released a rule-making agenda outlining its priorities for the coming year, and any planned rule-making on cryptocurrencies appears to have taken a back seat to the regulator's other priorities, including new disclosure rules on climate-change risk.</p>\n<p>Stablecoin regulation is perhaps the largest threat to the broader cryptocurrency market, experts say. A stablecoin is a kind of virtual currency that aims to maintain a peg to a stable asset, like the U.S. dollar , which facilitates trading from one cryptocurrency to another.</p>\n<p>Many critics say the growth of stablecoins like Tether, USD Coin, and DAI, pose significant risks to financial stability, especially after it has been revealed that some of these dollar-pegged tokens are not backed by actual U.S. dollars, but a combination of much riskier assets. In February, the New York State Attorney General Letitia James banned the use of Tethe r and an associated crypto exchange, Bitfinex, in the state.</p>\n<p>Following a settlement of the investigation, Tether revealed that the currency was not backed one-to-one by U.S. dollar reserves, but largely by short-term loans at the time that \"Under the terms of the settlement, we admit no wrongdoing. The settlement amount we have agreed to pay to the Attorney General's Office should be viewed as a measure of our desire to put this matter behind us and focus on our business.\"</p>\n<p>Tim Swanson, founder of the tech advisory Frim Post Oak labs, wrote in January that stablecoins were \"parasitic\" because they operated just like \"non-bank financial intermediaries that provide services similar to traditional commercial banks, but outside normal banking regulation.\"</p>\n<p>This kind of behavior puts not only stablecoin holders at risk but could potentially threaten financial stability in general, if a run on a stablecoin causes the asset and other cryptocurrency prices to collapse, he argued. Given that more than 75% of bitcoin trading is done in Tether, such a collapse could also disrupt the market for bitcoin and other popular cryptocurrencies, according to crypto services company FlowBank.</p>\n<p>Which regulator will step up to address these issues remains unknown, according to Brennan, who argued that federal bank regulators, securities regulators and state regulators have overlapping jurisdiction over cryptocurrencies and that this has been complicated by the fact that President Joe Biden has yet to nominate someone to run the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, which oversees national banks.</p>\n<p>\"There will be a regulatory slap fight here, and the SEC and the Commodities Futures Trading Commission haven't scrambled to say 'this is ours,'\" she said. \"Congress or federal bank regulators will have to come in to address the underlying issues with stablecoins from a market stability and safety perspective, to ensure that issuers have internal control and disclosure obligations and aren't going to just collapse and cause market instability.\"</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"CAAS":"中汽系统"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2145031916","content_text":"Bitcoin's dollar price falls more than 10% Monday.\n\nThe world's most popular cryptocurrencies took it on the chin Monday after the Chinese government continued its regulatory crackdown on bitcoin miners and companies that provide payment services for crypto-related transactions.\nThe People's Bank of China said in a notice Monday that \"virtual currency trading activities disrupt the normal economic and financial orders, breed the risks of illegal cross-border transfer of assets, money laundering and other illegal and criminal activities, and seriously infringe the people's property safety.\"\nThe central bank's statement came a day after the regional Chinese government in Sichuan announced it would close more than two dozen suspected cryptocurrency-mining operations in the hydroelectricity-rich region.\nThe dollar price of bitcoin tumbled roughly 11% early Monday morning before paring those losses slightly. Ether was trading 13% lower Monday afternoon , while dogecoin was down about 25%.\nThe moves underscore the influence that large governments, like China and the U.S., hold over the price of bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies, experts say.\nFamed author, mathematician and investor Nassim Nicholas Taleb on Sunday published a paper critical of bitcoin enthusiasts, who he said seriously underestimate the threat that government power poses to cryptocurrencies.\n\"By its very nature, bitcoin is open for all to see,\" he wrote, referencing the pseudonymous, rather than anonymous, nature of bitcoin. \"The belief in one's ability to hide one's assets from the government with a public blockchain...not just read by the FBI but by people in their living room, requires a certain lack of financial seasoning and statistical understanding -- perhaps even simple common sense.\"\nMeanwhile, regulators are clearly signaling they will continue to enact more regulations on the cryptosphere, including new rules that would hold exchanges and banks to stricter know-your-customer and anti-money-laundering regulations.\nSecurities and Exchange Commission Chairman Gary Gensler has repeatedly discussed the need for greater regulation of crypto exchanges to protect investors, while saying that he considers many of the thousands of extant cryptocurrencies trading on exchanges to be unregistered securities that are subject to SEC enforcement actions.\nSarah Brennan, an attorney at the law firm Harter Secrest & Emery, told MarketWatch that bolder enforcement against cryptocurrency firms that are selling unregistered securities is a major risk for her clients.\n\"It's frustrating to work in this space because you don't have clarity on a lot of things,\" she said, adding that she was surprised that the SEC wasn't bringing more enforcement actions against cryptocurrency companies that have raised money through auctioning their tokens, which often violates federal rules. \"But the SEC has been...really mum on their agenda and their enforcement priorities,\" she added.\nIndeed, earlier this month the regulator released a rule-making agenda outlining its priorities for the coming year, and any planned rule-making on cryptocurrencies appears to have taken a back seat to the regulator's other priorities, including new disclosure rules on climate-change risk.\nStablecoin regulation is perhaps the largest threat to the broader cryptocurrency market, experts say. A stablecoin is a kind of virtual currency that aims to maintain a peg to a stable asset, like the U.S. dollar , which facilitates trading from one cryptocurrency to another.\nMany critics say the growth of stablecoins like Tether, USD Coin, and DAI, pose significant risks to financial stability, especially after it has been revealed that some of these dollar-pegged tokens are not backed by actual U.S. dollars, but a combination of much riskier assets. In February, the New York State Attorney General Letitia James banned the use of Tethe r and an associated crypto exchange, Bitfinex, in the state.\nFollowing a settlement of the investigation, Tether revealed that the currency was not backed one-to-one by U.S. dollar reserves, but largely by short-term loans at the time that \"Under the terms of the settlement, we admit no wrongdoing. The settlement amount we have agreed to pay to the Attorney General's Office should be viewed as a measure of our desire to put this matter behind us and focus on our business.\"\nTim Swanson, founder of the tech advisory Frim Post Oak labs, wrote in January that stablecoins were \"parasitic\" because they operated just like \"non-bank financial intermediaries that provide services similar to traditional commercial banks, but outside normal banking regulation.\"\nThis kind of behavior puts not only stablecoin holders at risk but could potentially threaten financial stability in general, if a run on a stablecoin causes the asset and other cryptocurrency prices to collapse, he argued. Given that more than 75% of bitcoin trading is done in Tether, such a collapse could also disrupt the market for bitcoin and other popular cryptocurrencies, according to crypto services company FlowBank.\nWhich regulator will step up to address these issues remains unknown, according to Brennan, who argued that federal bank regulators, securities regulators and state regulators have overlapping jurisdiction over cryptocurrencies and that this has been complicated by the fact that President Joe Biden has yet to nominate someone to run the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, which oversees national banks.\n\"There will be a regulatory slap fight here, and the SEC and the Commodities Futures Trading Commission haven't scrambled to say 'this is ours,'\" she said. \"Congress or federal bank regulators will have to come in to address the underlying issues with stablecoins from a market stability and safety perspective, to ensure that issuers have internal control and disclosure obligations and aren't going to just collapse and cause market instability.\"","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":214,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":129069832,"gmtCreate":1624344822226,"gmtModify":1703834033611,"author":{"id":"3562919640401993","authorId":"3562919640401993","name":"Jiangbox","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7379f7108480b709cc9a6a874592f0ae","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3562919640401993","authorIdStr":"3562919640401993"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Only US stocks are going up, continue to buy US stocks.","listText":"Only US stocks are going up, continue to buy US stocks.","text":"Only US stocks are going up, continue to buy US stocks.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/129069832","repostId":"2145628031","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2145628031","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1624344000,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2145628031?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-22 14:40","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Amazon and Apple are the most valuable brands in the world -- but these Chinese companies are catching up","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2145628031","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"These are the top 100 most valuable global brands for 2021, according to a company that analyzes brand equity.Amazon and Apple are the world's most valuable brands, but watch out -- these Chinese e-commerce leaders are slowly but surely rising in the ranks.Tech giants Amazon $$, Apple $$, Google $$ and Microsoft $$ lead this year's list of Top 100 Most Valuable Global Brands by Kantar BrandZ, a company that analyzes brand equity, but Chinese social media and video games company Tencent is close ","content":"<blockquote>\n These are the top 100 most valuable global brands for 2021, according to a company that analyzes brand equity.\n</blockquote>\n<p>Amazon and Apple are the world's most valuable brands, but watch out -- these Chinese e-commerce leaders are slowly but surely rising in the ranks.</p>\n<p>Tech giants Amazon <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMZN\">$(AMZN)$</a>, Apple <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">$(AAPL)$</a>, Google <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GOOGL\">$(GOOGL)$</a> and Microsoft <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSFT\">$(MSFT)$</a> lead this year's list of Top 100 Most Valuable Global Brands by Kantar BrandZ, a company that analyzes brand equity, but Chinese social media and video games company Tencent is close behind in fifth place.</p>\n<p>Kantar BrandZ uses its own formula to come up with a company's value. It calls it \"a holistic portrait of brand equity: <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE\">one</a> that incorporates how the market values a company's brand assets -- and how ordinary people do.\"</p>\n<p>While Amazon's value increased 64% this year to reach $684 billion, Tencent grew 60% to hit $240 billion. Tesla <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">$(TSLA)$</a> also skyrocketed a whopping 275% to notch $43 billion, landing at 47th place on the list.</p>\n<p>More than a dozen other Chinese brands also made the list, including a few that more than doubled in value in the past year: alcohol maker Moutai was in 11th place with $109 billion, internet company Meituan was in 34th place with $52 billion, and farm-produce-selling platform Pinduoduo <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PDD\">$(PDD)$</a> in 81st place with $22 billion.</p>\n<p>TikTok , which placed 45th, was valued at $44 billion.</p>\n<p>\"Chinese brands are steadily and slowly progressing,\" Graham Staplehurst, global strategy director at Kantar BrandZ, told Reuters . \"[They] have made significant headway as more companies leverage their own technological developments and demonstrate their abilities to align with the major trends shaping China and the global market.\"</p>\n<p>Most European brands didn't follow the same growth trend, however. These brands made up only eight percent of the top 100, compared with 20% a decade ago. France's luxury fashion label Louis Vuitton was the most valuable European brand, placing 21st on the list. German software company SAP was 26th, followed by the UK telecommunications company Vodafone at 60th.</p>\n<p>American brands made up the majority of the most valuable companies, comprising 74% of the list. Thirteen brands made the list for the first time, including <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ZM\">Zoom</a> (ZM) in 52nd place with $37 billion and Spotify <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SPOT\">$(SPOT)$</a> in 99th place with $19 billion.</p>\n<p>All 100 listed brands were valued at a combined $7.1 trillion, an increase from last year's $5 trillion.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Amazon and Apple are the most valuable brands in the world -- but these Chinese companies are catching up</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAmazon and Apple are the most valuable brands in the world -- but these Chinese companies are catching up\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-06-22 14:40</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<blockquote>\n These are the top 100 most valuable global brands for 2021, according to a company that analyzes brand equity.\n</blockquote>\n<p>Amazon and Apple are the world's most valuable brands, but watch out -- these Chinese e-commerce leaders are slowly but surely rising in the ranks.</p>\n<p>Tech giants Amazon <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMZN\">$(AMZN)$</a>, Apple <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">$(AAPL)$</a>, Google <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GOOGL\">$(GOOGL)$</a> and Microsoft <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSFT\">$(MSFT)$</a> lead this year's list of Top 100 Most Valuable Global Brands by Kantar BrandZ, a company that analyzes brand equity, but Chinese social media and video games company Tencent is close behind in fifth place.</p>\n<p>Kantar BrandZ uses its own formula to come up with a company's value. It calls it \"a holistic portrait of brand equity: <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE\">one</a> that incorporates how the market values a company's brand assets -- and how ordinary people do.\"</p>\n<p>While Amazon's value increased 64% this year to reach $684 billion, Tencent grew 60% to hit $240 billion. Tesla <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">$(TSLA)$</a> also skyrocketed a whopping 275% to notch $43 billion, landing at 47th place on the list.</p>\n<p>More than a dozen other Chinese brands also made the list, including a few that more than doubled in value in the past year: alcohol maker Moutai was in 11th place with $109 billion, internet company Meituan was in 34th place with $52 billion, and farm-produce-selling platform Pinduoduo <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PDD\">$(PDD)$</a> in 81st place with $22 billion.</p>\n<p>TikTok , which placed 45th, was valued at $44 billion.</p>\n<p>\"Chinese brands are steadily and slowly progressing,\" Graham Staplehurst, global strategy director at Kantar BrandZ, told Reuters . \"[They] have made significant headway as more companies leverage their own technological developments and demonstrate their abilities to align with the major trends shaping China and the global market.\"</p>\n<p>Most European brands didn't follow the same growth trend, however. These brands made up only eight percent of the top 100, compared with 20% a decade ago. France's luxury fashion label Louis Vuitton was the most valuable European brand, placing 21st on the list. German software company SAP was 26th, followed by the UK telecommunications company Vodafone at 60th.</p>\n<p>American brands made up the majority of the most valuable companies, comprising 74% of the list. Thirteen brands made the list for the first time, including <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ZM\">Zoom</a> (ZM) in 52nd place with $37 billion and Spotify <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SPOT\">$(SPOT)$</a> in 99th place with $19 billion.</p>\n<p>All 100 listed brands were valued at a combined $7.1 trillion, an increase from last year's $5 trillion.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"600519":"贵州茅台","03690":"美团-W","ZM":"Zoom","QNETCN":"纳斯达克中美互联网老虎指数","03086":"华夏纳指","TCEHY":"腾讯控股ADR","AAPL":"苹果","TSLA":"特斯拉","09086":"华夏纳指-U","GOOG":"谷歌","00700":"腾讯控股","MSFT":"微软","SPOT":"Spotify Technology S.A.","PDD":"拼多多","GOOGL":"谷歌A","AMZN":"亚马逊"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2145628031","content_text":"These are the top 100 most valuable global brands for 2021, according to a company that analyzes brand equity.\n\nAmazon and Apple are the world's most valuable brands, but watch out -- these Chinese e-commerce leaders are slowly but surely rising in the ranks.\nTech giants Amazon $(AMZN)$, Apple $(AAPL)$, Google $(GOOGL)$ and Microsoft $(MSFT)$ lead this year's list of Top 100 Most Valuable Global Brands by Kantar BrandZ, a company that analyzes brand equity, but Chinese social media and video games company Tencent is close behind in fifth place.\nKantar BrandZ uses its own formula to come up with a company's value. It calls it \"a holistic portrait of brand equity: one that incorporates how the market values a company's brand assets -- and how ordinary people do.\"\nWhile Amazon's value increased 64% this year to reach $684 billion, Tencent grew 60% to hit $240 billion. Tesla $(TSLA)$ also skyrocketed a whopping 275% to notch $43 billion, landing at 47th place on the list.\nMore than a dozen other Chinese brands also made the list, including a few that more than doubled in value in the past year: alcohol maker Moutai was in 11th place with $109 billion, internet company Meituan was in 34th place with $52 billion, and farm-produce-selling platform Pinduoduo $(PDD)$ in 81st place with $22 billion.\nTikTok , which placed 45th, was valued at $44 billion.\n\"Chinese brands are steadily and slowly progressing,\" Graham Staplehurst, global strategy director at Kantar BrandZ, told Reuters . \"[They] have made significant headway as more companies leverage their own technological developments and demonstrate their abilities to align with the major trends shaping China and the global market.\"\nMost European brands didn't follow the same growth trend, however. These brands made up only eight percent of the top 100, compared with 20% a decade ago. France's luxury fashion label Louis Vuitton was the most valuable European brand, placing 21st on the list. German software company SAP was 26th, followed by the UK telecommunications company Vodafone at 60th.\nAmerican brands made up the majority of the most valuable companies, comprising 74% of the list. Thirteen brands made the list for the first time, including Zoom (ZM) in 52nd place with $37 billion and Spotify $(SPOT)$ in 99th place with $19 billion.\nAll 100 listed brands were valued at a combined $7.1 trillion, an increase from last year's $5 trillion.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":452,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":164003950,"gmtCreate":1624159788770,"gmtModify":1703829795042,"author":{"id":"3562919640401993","authorId":"3562919640401993","name":"Jiangbox","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7379f7108480b709cc9a6a874592f0ae","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3562919640401993","authorIdStr":"3562919640401993"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Will consider to add more.","listText":"Will consider to add more.","text":"Will consider to add more.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/164003950","repostId":"1192473918","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1192473918","pubTimestamp":1624029343,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1192473918?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-18 23:15","market":"us","language":"en","title":"PLTR Stock: The Palantir-FAA Deal News Should Have Investors Smiling Today","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1192473918","media":"investorplace","summary":"Palantir Technologies(NYSE:PLTR) stock is on the move Friday following news of a deal with the Feder","content":"<p><b>Palantir Technologies</b>(NYSE:<b><u>PLTR</u></b>) stock is on the move Friday following news of a deal with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA).</p>\n<p>The goal of this deal is toassist the FAA in modernizing its ” objectives for aviation safety.”This will have Palantir Technologies providing the agency with a data analyzing tool to help with that effort.</p>\n<p>According to a news release, this will have Palantir Technologies monitoring various safety aspects for the FAA. That includes reintegrating the 737 MAX fleet back into service after it was suspended due to fatal crashes.</p>\n<p>Palantir Technologies’ deal with the FAA is set to last for one year. However, there’s also the option to extend it by up to two years. The agreement has a maximum value of $18.4 million.</p>\n<p>Akash Jain, president of Palantir USG, said the following about the agreement with the FAA that should have PLTR stock gaining today.</p>\n<blockquote>\n “We are proud to be partnering with the Federal Aviation Administration to support their critical safety mission.”\n</blockquote>\n<p>The fact that PLTR stock is actually moving lower today despite this news is strange. The company’s shares did start off rising in early morning trading, but quickly fell back down to yesterday’s close before dipping even lower.</p>\n<p>It’s also worth noting that trading volume isn’t taking off on news of the FAA deal, either. As of this writing, more than 20 million shares of PLTR stock had changed hands. That’s still well below the company’s daily average trading volume of 57.8 million shares.</p>\n<p>PLTR stock was down 1.1% as of Friday morning.</p>","source":"lsy1606302653667","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>PLTR Stock: The Palantir-FAA Deal News Should Have Investors Smiling Today</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nPLTR Stock: The Palantir-FAA Deal News Should Have Investors Smiling Today\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-06-18 23:15 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://investorplace.com/2021/06/pltr-stock-the-palantir-faa-deal-news-should-have-investors-smiling-today/><strong>investorplace</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Palantir Technologies(NYSE:PLTR) stock is on the move Friday following news of a deal with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA).\nThe goal of this deal is toassist the FAA in modernizing its ” ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://investorplace.com/2021/06/pltr-stock-the-palantir-faa-deal-news-should-have-investors-smiling-today/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"PLTR":"Palantir Technologies Inc."},"source_url":"https://investorplace.com/2021/06/pltr-stock-the-palantir-faa-deal-news-should-have-investors-smiling-today/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1192473918","content_text":"Palantir Technologies(NYSE:PLTR) stock is on the move Friday following news of a deal with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA).\nThe goal of this deal is toassist the FAA in modernizing its ” objectives for aviation safety.”This will have Palantir Technologies providing the agency with a data analyzing tool to help with that effort.\nAccording to a news release, this will have Palantir Technologies monitoring various safety aspects for the FAA. That includes reintegrating the 737 MAX fleet back into service after it was suspended due to fatal crashes.\nPalantir Technologies’ deal with the FAA is set to last for one year. However, there’s also the option to extend it by up to two years. The agreement has a maximum value of $18.4 million.\nAkash Jain, president of Palantir USG, said the following about the agreement with the FAA that should have PLTR stock gaining today.\n\n “We are proud to be partnering with the Federal Aviation Administration to support their critical safety mission.”\n\nThe fact that PLTR stock is actually moving lower today despite this news is strange. The company’s shares did start off rising in early morning trading, but quickly fell back down to yesterday’s close before dipping even lower.\nIt’s also worth noting that trading volume isn’t taking off on news of the FAA deal, either. As of this writing, more than 20 million shares of PLTR stock had changed hands. That’s still well below the company’s daily average trading volume of 57.8 million shares.\nPLTR stock was down 1.1% as of Friday morning.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":410,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":165774423,"gmtCreate":1624159671162,"gmtModify":1703829789540,"author":{"id":"3562919640401993","authorId":"3562919640401993","name":"Jiangbox","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7379f7108480b709cc9a6a874592f0ae","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3562919640401993","authorIdStr":"3562919640401993"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"AMC still got room to shoot up, target 80-90.","listText":"AMC still got room to shoot up, target 80-90.","text":"AMC still got room to shoot up, target 80-90.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/165774423","repostId":"1166679093","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1166679093","pubTimestamp":1624065234,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1166679093?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-19 09:13","market":"us","language":"en","title":"3 Meme Stocks Wall Street Predicts Will Plunge More Than 20%","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1166679093","media":"fool","summary":"Meme stocks have been all the rage so far this year. That's understandable, with several of them del","content":"<p>Meme stocks have been all the rage so far this year. That's understandable, with several of them delivering triple-digit and even four-digit percentage gains.</p>\n<p>However, what goes up can come down. Analysts don't expect the online frenzy fueling the ginormous jumps for some of the most popular stocks will be sustainable. Here are three meme stocks that Wall Street thinks will plunge by more than 20% within the next 12 months.</p>\n<p>AMC Entertainment</p>\n<p><b>AMC Entertainment</b>(NYSE:AMC)ranks as the best-performing meme stock of all. Shares of the movie theater operator have skyrocketed close to 2,500% year to date.</p>\n<p>The consensus among analysts, though, is that the stock could lose 90% of its current value. Even the most optimistic analyst surveyed by Refinitiv has a price target for AMC that's more than 70% below the current share price.</p>\n<p>But isn't AMC's business picking up? Yep. The easing of restrictions has enabled the company to reopen 99% of its U.S. theaters. AMC could benefit as seating capacity limitations imposed by state and local governments are raised. Thereleases of multiple movies this summerand later this year that are likely to be hits should also help.</p>\n<p>However, Wall Street clearly believes that AMC's share price has gotten way ahead of its business prospects. The stock is trading at nearly eight times higher than it was before the COVID-19 pandemic.</p>\n<p>Clover Health Investments</p>\n<p>Only a few days ago, it looked like&nbsp;<b>Clover Health Investments</b>(NASDAQ:CLOV)might push AMC to the side as the hottest meme stock. Retail investors viewed Clover as a primeshort squeezecandidate.</p>\n<p>Since the beginning of June, shares of Clover Health have jumped more than 65%. Analysts, however, don't expect those gains to last. The average price target for the stock is 25% below the current share price.</p>\n<p>Clover Health's valuation does seem to have gotten out of hand. The healthcare stock currently trades at more than 170 times trailing-12-month sales. That's a nosebleed level, especially considering that the company is the subject of investigations by the U.S. Department of Justice and the Securities and Exchange Commission.</p>\n<p>Still, Clover Health could deliver improving financial results this year. The company hopes to significantly increase its membership by targeting the original Medicare program. This represents a major new market opportunity in addition to its current Medicare Advantage business.</p>\n<p>Sundial Growers</p>\n<p>At one point earlier this year,&nbsp;<b>Sundial Growers</b>(NASDAQ:SNDL)appeared to be a legitimate contender to become the biggest winner among meme stocks. The Canadian marijuana stock vaulted more than 520% higher year to date before giving up much of its gains. However, Sundial's share price has still more than doubled in 2021.</p>\n<p>Analysts anticipate that the pot stock could fall even further. The consensus price target for Sundial reflects a 23% discount to its current share price. One analyst even thinks the stock could sink 55%.</p>\n<p>There certainly are reasons to be pessimistic about Sundial's core cannabis business. The company's net cannabis revenue fell year over year in the first quarter of 2021. Although Sundial is taking steps that it hopes will turn things around, it remains to be seen if those efforts will succeed.</p>\n<p>Sundial's business deals could give investors reasons for optimism. After all, the company posted positive adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) in Q1 due to its investments.</p>\n<p>However, the cash that Sundial is using to make these investments has come at the cost of increased dilution of its stock. The company can't afford any additional dilution without having to resort to desperate measures to keep its listing on the&nbsp;<b>Nasdaq</b>&nbsp;stock exchange.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>3 Meme Stocks Wall Street Predicts Will Plunge More Than 20%</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n3 Meme Stocks Wall Street Predicts Will Plunge More Than 20%\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-06-19 09:13 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/06/18/3-meme-stocks-wall-street-predicts-will-plunge-mor/><strong>fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Meme stocks have been all the rage so far this year. That's understandable, with several of them delivering triple-digit and even four-digit percentage gains.\nHowever, what goes up can come down. ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/06/18/3-meme-stocks-wall-street-predicts-will-plunge-mor/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AMC":"AMC院线","SNDL":"SNDL Inc.","CLOV":"Clover Health Corp"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/06/18/3-meme-stocks-wall-street-predicts-will-plunge-mor/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1166679093","content_text":"Meme stocks have been all the rage so far this year. That's understandable, with several of them delivering triple-digit and even four-digit percentage gains.\nHowever, what goes up can come down. Analysts don't expect the online frenzy fueling the ginormous jumps for some of the most popular stocks will be sustainable. Here are three meme stocks that Wall Street thinks will plunge by more than 20% within the next 12 months.\nAMC Entertainment\nAMC Entertainment(NYSE:AMC)ranks as the best-performing meme stock of all. Shares of the movie theater operator have skyrocketed close to 2,500% year to date.\nThe consensus among analysts, though, is that the stock could lose 90% of its current value. Even the most optimistic analyst surveyed by Refinitiv has a price target for AMC that's more than 70% below the current share price.\nBut isn't AMC's business picking up? Yep. The easing of restrictions has enabled the company to reopen 99% of its U.S. theaters. AMC could benefit as seating capacity limitations imposed by state and local governments are raised. Thereleases of multiple movies this summerand later this year that are likely to be hits should also help.\nHowever, Wall Street clearly believes that AMC's share price has gotten way ahead of its business prospects. The stock is trading at nearly eight times higher than it was before the COVID-19 pandemic.\nClover Health Investments\nOnly a few days ago, it looked like Clover Health Investments(NASDAQ:CLOV)might push AMC to the side as the hottest meme stock. Retail investors viewed Clover as a primeshort squeezecandidate.\nSince the beginning of June, shares of Clover Health have jumped more than 65%. Analysts, however, don't expect those gains to last. The average price target for the stock is 25% below the current share price.\nClover Health's valuation does seem to have gotten out of hand. The healthcare stock currently trades at more than 170 times trailing-12-month sales. That's a nosebleed level, especially considering that the company is the subject of investigations by the U.S. Department of Justice and the Securities and Exchange Commission.\nStill, Clover Health could deliver improving financial results this year. The company hopes to significantly increase its membership by targeting the original Medicare program. This represents a major new market opportunity in addition to its current Medicare Advantage business.\nSundial Growers\nAt one point earlier this year, Sundial Growers(NASDAQ:SNDL)appeared to be a legitimate contender to become the biggest winner among meme stocks. The Canadian marijuana stock vaulted more than 520% higher year to date before giving up much of its gains. However, Sundial's share price has still more than doubled in 2021.\nAnalysts anticipate that the pot stock could fall even further. The consensus price target for Sundial reflects a 23% discount to its current share price. One analyst even thinks the stock could sink 55%.\nThere certainly are reasons to be pessimistic about Sundial's core cannabis business. The company's net cannabis revenue fell year over year in the first quarter of 2021. Although Sundial is taking steps that it hopes will turn things around, it remains to be seen if those efforts will succeed.\nSundial's business deals could give investors reasons for optimism. After all, the company posted positive adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) in Q1 due to its investments.\nHowever, the cash that Sundial is using to make these investments has come at the cost of increased dilution of its stock. The company can't afford any additional dilution without having to resort to desperate measures to keep its listing on the Nasdaq stock exchange.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":556,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":165771708,"gmtCreate":1624159522004,"gmtModify":1703829781774,"author":{"id":"3562919640401993","authorId":"3562919640401993","name":"Jiangbox","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7379f7108480b709cc9a6a874592f0ae","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3562919640401993","authorIdStr":"3562919640401993"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Apple can keep for long term.","listText":"Apple can keep for long term.","text":"Apple can keep for long term.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/165771708","repostId":"1183124175","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1183124175","pubTimestamp":1624151620,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1183124175?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-20 09:13","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Beware these risky tech stocks in your portfolio, strategist Parker warns","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1183124175","media":"cnbc","summary":"As investors cycle back into growth stocks, one market strategist warns against certain technology names he believes are high risk.Growth stocks are shares of companies expected to grow at a faster rate than the rest of the market. However, these names are typically riskier and more volatile than the average stock.Adam Parker, former Morgan Stanley chief U.S. equity strategist and founder of Trivariate Research, said the time is right to buy growth shares, but investors should be cautious of a f","content":"<div>\n<p>As investors cycle back into growth stocks, one market strategist warns against certain technology names he believes are high risk.\nGrowth stocks are shares of companies expected to grow at a faster ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/06/19/tech-stocks-strategist-warns-of-risky-names.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"cnbc_highlight","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Beware these risky tech stocks in your portfolio, strategist Parker warns</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBeware these risky tech stocks in your portfolio, strategist Parker warns\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-06-20 09:13 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.cnbc.com/2021/06/19/tech-stocks-strategist-warns-of-risky-names.html><strong>cnbc</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>As investors cycle back into growth stocks, one market strategist warns against certain technology names he believes are high risk.\nGrowth stocks are shares of companies expected to grow at a faster ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/06/19/tech-stocks-strategist-warns-of-risky-names.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果","MCHP":"微芯科技","NVDA":"英伟达","SQ":"Block","TWLO":"Twilio Inc"},"source_url":"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/06/19/tech-stocks-strategist-warns-of-risky-names.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/72bb72e1b84c09fca865c6dcb1bbcd16","article_id":"1183124175","content_text":"As investors cycle back into growth stocks, one market strategist warns against certain technology names he believes are high risk.\nGrowth stocks are shares of companies expected to grow at a faster rate than the rest of the market. However, these names are typically riskier and more volatile than the average stock.\nAdam Parker, former Morgan Stanley chief U.S. equity strategist and founder of Trivariate Research, said the time is right to buy growth shares, but investors should be cautious of a few.\n“We think that portfolio managers should be buying growth stocks again, focusing on positive free cash flow and margin expansion, not earnings-based valuation,” Parker said in a note released Wednesday.\nTrivariate Research used a number of criteria to identify risky stocks, including low or negative correlation to inflation, high correlation to the economic reopening and high levels of company insiders selling their shares. The research firm then identified the eight riskiest names based on those measures.\n“Our view is that these are among the riskiest stocks to own today, so investors who own these names should have disproportionate upside to their base cases to compensate them for these risks,” Parker said.\nTake a look at five of the riskiest technology stocks, according to Trivariate.\nRISKIEST TECH STOCKS, ACCORDING TO TRIVARIATE\n\n\n\nTICKER\nCOMPANY\nPRICE\n%CHANGE\n\n\n\n\nMCHP\nMicrochip Technology Inc\n145.62\n-3.0686\n\n\nTWLO\nTwilio Inc\n367.61\n1.84\n\n\nSQ\nSquare Inc\n237.05\n0.39\n\n\nNVDA\nNVIDIA Corp\n745.55\n-0.0992\n\n\nAAPL\nApple Inc\n130.46\n-1.0092\n\n\n\nApple is on Trivariate’s list of riskiest stocks. The research firm identifies Apple as one of the stocks with the most negative correlation to inflation. Trivariate predicts that if bond yields rise or if fears of inflation continue, shares of Apple will underperform the market.\nNvidiaalso makes the list of risky tech stocks. Trivariate found the semiconductor stock has one of the most asymmetric beta — meaning the stock is consistently more volatile than the broader market during a market pullback compared with typical times.\nTrivariate also named payments companySquare, cloud communications platformTwilioand semiconductor manufacturerMicrochip Technologyamong the riskiest technology stocks.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":428,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":129069832,"gmtCreate":1624344822226,"gmtModify":1703834033611,"author":{"id":"3562919640401993","authorId":"3562919640401993","name":"Jiangbox","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7379f7108480b709cc9a6a874592f0ae","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3562919640401993","authorIdStr":"3562919640401993"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Only US stocks are going up, continue to buy US stocks.","listText":"Only US stocks are going up, continue to buy US stocks.","text":"Only US stocks are going up, continue to buy US stocks.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/129069832","repostId":"2145628031","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2145628031","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1624344000,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2145628031?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-22 14:40","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Amazon and Apple are the most valuable brands in the world -- but these Chinese companies are catching up","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2145628031","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"These are the top 100 most valuable global brands for 2021, according to a company that analyzes brand equity.Amazon and Apple are the world's most valuable brands, but watch out -- these Chinese e-commerce leaders are slowly but surely rising in the ranks.Tech giants Amazon $$, Apple $$, Google $$ and Microsoft $$ lead this year's list of Top 100 Most Valuable Global Brands by Kantar BrandZ, a company that analyzes brand equity, but Chinese social media and video games company Tencent is close ","content":"<blockquote>\n These are the top 100 most valuable global brands for 2021, according to a company that analyzes brand equity.\n</blockquote>\n<p>Amazon and Apple are the world's most valuable brands, but watch out -- these Chinese e-commerce leaders are slowly but surely rising in the ranks.</p>\n<p>Tech giants Amazon <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMZN\">$(AMZN)$</a>, Apple <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">$(AAPL)$</a>, Google <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GOOGL\">$(GOOGL)$</a> and Microsoft <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSFT\">$(MSFT)$</a> lead this year's list of Top 100 Most Valuable Global Brands by Kantar BrandZ, a company that analyzes brand equity, but Chinese social media and video games company Tencent is close behind in fifth place.</p>\n<p>Kantar BrandZ uses its own formula to come up with a company's value. It calls it \"a holistic portrait of brand equity: <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE\">one</a> that incorporates how the market values a company's brand assets -- and how ordinary people do.\"</p>\n<p>While Amazon's value increased 64% this year to reach $684 billion, Tencent grew 60% to hit $240 billion. Tesla <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">$(TSLA)$</a> also skyrocketed a whopping 275% to notch $43 billion, landing at 47th place on the list.</p>\n<p>More than a dozen other Chinese brands also made the list, including a few that more than doubled in value in the past year: alcohol maker Moutai was in 11th place with $109 billion, internet company Meituan was in 34th place with $52 billion, and farm-produce-selling platform Pinduoduo <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PDD\">$(PDD)$</a> in 81st place with $22 billion.</p>\n<p>TikTok , which placed 45th, was valued at $44 billion.</p>\n<p>\"Chinese brands are steadily and slowly progressing,\" Graham Staplehurst, global strategy director at Kantar BrandZ, told Reuters . \"[They] have made significant headway as more companies leverage their own technological developments and demonstrate their abilities to align with the major trends shaping China and the global market.\"</p>\n<p>Most European brands didn't follow the same growth trend, however. These brands made up only eight percent of the top 100, compared with 20% a decade ago. France's luxury fashion label Louis Vuitton was the most valuable European brand, placing 21st on the list. German software company SAP was 26th, followed by the UK telecommunications company Vodafone at 60th.</p>\n<p>American brands made up the majority of the most valuable companies, comprising 74% of the list. Thirteen brands made the list for the first time, including <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ZM\">Zoom</a> (ZM) in 52nd place with $37 billion and Spotify <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SPOT\">$(SPOT)$</a> in 99th place with $19 billion.</p>\n<p>All 100 listed brands were valued at a combined $7.1 trillion, an increase from last year's $5 trillion.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Amazon and Apple are the most valuable brands in the world -- but these Chinese companies are catching up</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAmazon and Apple are the most valuable brands in the world -- but these Chinese companies are catching up\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-06-22 14:40</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<blockquote>\n These are the top 100 most valuable global brands for 2021, according to a company that analyzes brand equity.\n</blockquote>\n<p>Amazon and Apple are the world's most valuable brands, but watch out -- these Chinese e-commerce leaders are slowly but surely rising in the ranks.</p>\n<p>Tech giants Amazon <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMZN\">$(AMZN)$</a>, Apple <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">$(AAPL)$</a>, Google <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GOOGL\">$(GOOGL)$</a> and Microsoft <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSFT\">$(MSFT)$</a> lead this year's list of Top 100 Most Valuable Global Brands by Kantar BrandZ, a company that analyzes brand equity, but Chinese social media and video games company Tencent is close behind in fifth place.</p>\n<p>Kantar BrandZ uses its own formula to come up with a company's value. It calls it \"a holistic portrait of brand equity: <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE\">one</a> that incorporates how the market values a company's brand assets -- and how ordinary people do.\"</p>\n<p>While Amazon's value increased 64% this year to reach $684 billion, Tencent grew 60% to hit $240 billion. Tesla <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">$(TSLA)$</a> also skyrocketed a whopping 275% to notch $43 billion, landing at 47th place on the list.</p>\n<p>More than a dozen other Chinese brands also made the list, including a few that more than doubled in value in the past year: alcohol maker Moutai was in 11th place with $109 billion, internet company Meituan was in 34th place with $52 billion, and farm-produce-selling platform Pinduoduo <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PDD\">$(PDD)$</a> in 81st place with $22 billion.</p>\n<p>TikTok , which placed 45th, was valued at $44 billion.</p>\n<p>\"Chinese brands are steadily and slowly progressing,\" Graham Staplehurst, global strategy director at Kantar BrandZ, told Reuters . \"[They] have made significant headway as more companies leverage their own technological developments and demonstrate their abilities to align with the major trends shaping China and the global market.\"</p>\n<p>Most European brands didn't follow the same growth trend, however. These brands made up only eight percent of the top 100, compared with 20% a decade ago. France's luxury fashion label Louis Vuitton was the most valuable European brand, placing 21st on the list. German software company SAP was 26th, followed by the UK telecommunications company Vodafone at 60th.</p>\n<p>American brands made up the majority of the most valuable companies, comprising 74% of the list. Thirteen brands made the list for the first time, including <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ZM\">Zoom</a> (ZM) in 52nd place with $37 billion and Spotify <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SPOT\">$(SPOT)$</a> in 99th place with $19 billion.</p>\n<p>All 100 listed brands were valued at a combined $7.1 trillion, an increase from last year's $5 trillion.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"600519":"贵州茅台","03690":"美团-W","ZM":"Zoom","QNETCN":"纳斯达克中美互联网老虎指数","03086":"华夏纳指","TCEHY":"腾讯控股ADR","AAPL":"苹果","TSLA":"特斯拉","09086":"华夏纳指-U","GOOG":"谷歌","00700":"腾讯控股","MSFT":"微软","SPOT":"Spotify Technology S.A.","PDD":"拼多多","GOOGL":"谷歌A","AMZN":"亚马逊"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2145628031","content_text":"These are the top 100 most valuable global brands for 2021, according to a company that analyzes brand equity.\n\nAmazon and Apple are the world's most valuable brands, but watch out -- these Chinese e-commerce leaders are slowly but surely rising in the ranks.\nTech giants Amazon $(AMZN)$, Apple $(AAPL)$, Google $(GOOGL)$ and Microsoft $(MSFT)$ lead this year's list of Top 100 Most Valuable Global Brands by Kantar BrandZ, a company that analyzes brand equity, but Chinese social media and video games company Tencent is close behind in fifth place.\nKantar BrandZ uses its own formula to come up with a company's value. It calls it \"a holistic portrait of brand equity: one that incorporates how the market values a company's brand assets -- and how ordinary people do.\"\nWhile Amazon's value increased 64% this year to reach $684 billion, Tencent grew 60% to hit $240 billion. Tesla $(TSLA)$ also skyrocketed a whopping 275% to notch $43 billion, landing at 47th place on the list.\nMore than a dozen other Chinese brands also made the list, including a few that more than doubled in value in the past year: alcohol maker Moutai was in 11th place with $109 billion, internet company Meituan was in 34th place with $52 billion, and farm-produce-selling platform Pinduoduo $(PDD)$ in 81st place with $22 billion.\nTikTok , which placed 45th, was valued at $44 billion.\n\"Chinese brands are steadily and slowly progressing,\" Graham Staplehurst, global strategy director at Kantar BrandZ, told Reuters . \"[They] have made significant headway as more companies leverage their own technological developments and demonstrate their abilities to align with the major trends shaping China and the global market.\"\nMost European brands didn't follow the same growth trend, however. These brands made up only eight percent of the top 100, compared with 20% a decade ago. France's luxury fashion label Louis Vuitton was the most valuable European brand, placing 21st on the list. German software company SAP was 26th, followed by the UK telecommunications company Vodafone at 60th.\nAmerican brands made up the majority of the most valuable companies, comprising 74% of the list. Thirteen brands made the list for the first time, including Zoom (ZM) in 52nd place with $37 billion and Spotify $(SPOT)$ in 99th place with $19 billion.\nAll 100 listed brands were valued at a combined $7.1 trillion, an increase from last year's $5 trillion.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":452,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":342855851,"gmtCreate":1618201958973,"gmtModify":1704707449771,"author":{"id":"3562919640401993","authorId":"3562919640401993","name":"Jiangbox","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7379f7108480b709cc9a6a874592f0ae","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3562919640401993","authorIdStr":"3562919640401993"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Up up up please.","listText":"Up up up please.","text":"Up up up please.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/342855851","repostId":"2126005392","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2126005392","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Stock Market Quotes, Business News, Financial News, Trading Ideas, and Stock Research by Professionals","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Benzinga","id":"1052270027","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa"},"pubTimestamp":1618200080,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2126005392?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-04-12 12:01","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Analysts Upgraded AMC, Snap, United Airlines And Tesla In The Past Week","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2126005392","media":"Benzinga","summary":"Amid last's week trading, analysts came out with new ratings for some widely-followed stocks.Analysts and brokerage firms often use ratings when they issue stock recommendations to stock traders. Analysts arrive at stock ratings by researching public financial statements, communicating with executives and customers, and following industry trends.Here are the latest analyst ratings and updates for AMC, Snap, United Airlines and Tesla.B. Riley Financial upgraded AMC Entertainment Holdings Inc  Mon","content":"<p>Amid last's week trading, analysts came out with new ratings for some widely-followed stocks.</p>\n<p>Analysts and brokerage firms often use ratings when they issue stock recommendations to stock traders. Analysts arrive at stock ratings by researching public financial statements, communicating with executives and customers, and following industry trends.</p>\n<p>Here are the latest analyst ratings and updates for AMC, Snap, United Airlines and Tesla.</p>\n<p>B. Riley Financial upgraded <b>AMC Entertainment Holdings Inc&nbsp;</b>(NYSE: AMC) Monday from Neutral to Buy and raised its price target from $7 to $13 per share.</p>\n<p>Shares of AMC were trading lower this week. The stock opened Monday’s session at $10.09 and closed Friday lower by 6.64% at $9.42 for the week.</p>\n<p>Atlantic Equities upgraded <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SNAP\">Snap Inc</a></b> (NYSE: SNAP) from Neutral to Overweight and announced a price target of $75 per share.</p>\n<p>Shares of Snap soared this week. The social media stock opened Monday’s session at $55.18 and closed Friday higher by 14.66% at $63.27 for the week.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSTLW\">Morgan Stanley</a> upgraded <b>United Airlines Holdings Inc</b> (NASDAQ: UAL) to Equal-Weight and raised its price target to $65.</p>\n<p>Shares of United Airlines traded relatively flat this week. The airline stock opened Monday’s session at $59.34 and closed Friday lower by 1.54% at $58.43 for the week.</p>\n<p>Daniel Ives of Wedbush upgraded <b>Tesla Inc</b> (NASDAQ: TSLA) to Outperform from Neutral and upped the price target from $950 to $1,000. Ives has a long-term bull case target of $1,300 on Tesla.</p>\n<p>Shares of Tesla fell for the week. The EV giant opened Monday’s session at $707.53 and closed Friday lower by 4.31% at $677.02.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Analysts Upgraded AMC, Snap, United Airlines And Tesla In The Past Week</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAnalysts Upgraded AMC, Snap, United Airlines And Tesla In The Past Week\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Benzinga </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-04-12 12:01</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Amid last's week trading, analysts came out with new ratings for some widely-followed stocks.</p>\n<p>Analysts and brokerage firms often use ratings when they issue stock recommendations to stock traders. Analysts arrive at stock ratings by researching public financial statements, communicating with executives and customers, and following industry trends.</p>\n<p>Here are the latest analyst ratings and updates for AMC, Snap, United Airlines and Tesla.</p>\n<p>B. Riley Financial upgraded <b>AMC Entertainment Holdings Inc&nbsp;</b>(NYSE: AMC) Monday from Neutral to Buy and raised its price target from $7 to $13 per share.</p>\n<p>Shares of AMC were trading lower this week. The stock opened Monday’s session at $10.09 and closed Friday lower by 6.64% at $9.42 for the week.</p>\n<p>Atlantic Equities upgraded <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SNAP\">Snap Inc</a></b> (NYSE: SNAP) from Neutral to Overweight and announced a price target of $75 per share.</p>\n<p>Shares of Snap soared this week. The social media stock opened Monday’s session at $55.18 and closed Friday higher by 14.66% at $63.27 for the week.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSTLW\">Morgan Stanley</a> upgraded <b>United Airlines Holdings Inc</b> (NASDAQ: UAL) to Equal-Weight and raised its price target to $65.</p>\n<p>Shares of United Airlines traded relatively flat this week. The airline stock opened Monday’s session at $59.34 and closed Friday lower by 1.54% at $58.43 for the week.</p>\n<p>Daniel Ives of Wedbush upgraded <b>Tesla Inc</b> (NASDAQ: TSLA) to Outperform from Neutral and upped the price target from $950 to $1,000. Ives has a long-term bull case target of $1,300 on Tesla.</p>\n<p>Shares of Tesla fell for the week. The EV giant opened Monday’s session at $707.53 and closed Friday lower by 4.31% at $677.02.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"UAL":"联合大陆航空","AMC":"AMC院线","TSLA":"特斯拉","SNAP":"Snap Inc"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2126005392","content_text":"Amid last's week trading, analysts came out with new ratings for some widely-followed stocks.\nAnalysts and brokerage firms often use ratings when they issue stock recommendations to stock traders. Analysts arrive at stock ratings by researching public financial statements, communicating with executives and customers, and following industry trends.\nHere are the latest analyst ratings and updates for AMC, Snap, United Airlines and Tesla.\nB. Riley Financial upgraded AMC Entertainment Holdings Inc (NYSE: AMC) Monday from Neutral to Buy and raised its price target from $7 to $13 per share.\nShares of AMC were trading lower this week. The stock opened Monday’s session at $10.09 and closed Friday lower by 6.64% at $9.42 for the week.\nAtlantic Equities upgraded Snap Inc (NYSE: SNAP) from Neutral to Overweight and announced a price target of $75 per share.\nShares of Snap soared this week. The social media stock opened Monday’s session at $55.18 and closed Friday higher by 14.66% at $63.27 for the week.\nMorgan Stanley upgraded United Airlines Holdings Inc (NASDAQ: UAL) to Equal-Weight and raised its price target to $65.\nShares of United Airlines traded relatively flat this week. The airline stock opened Monday’s session at $59.34 and closed Friday lower by 1.54% at $58.43 for the week.\nDaniel Ives of Wedbush upgraded Tesla Inc (NASDAQ: TSLA) to Outperform from Neutral and upped the price target from $950 to $1,000. Ives has a long-term bull case target of $1,300 on Tesla.\nShares of Tesla fell for the week. The EV giant opened Monday’s session at $707.53 and closed Friday lower by 4.31% at $677.02.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":108,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":346425317,"gmtCreate":1618104882839,"gmtModify":1704706619798,"author":{"id":"3562919640401993","authorId":"3562919640401993","name":"Jiangbox","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7379f7108480b709cc9a6a874592f0ae","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3562919640401993","authorIdStr":"3562919640401993"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Can add some more.","listText":"Can add some more.","text":"Can add some more.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/346425317","repostId":"1142324412","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1142324412","pubTimestamp":1617982207,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1142324412?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-04-09 23:30","market":"us","language":"en","title":"XPeng Inc.: A Reawakening","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1142324412","media":"seekingalpha","summary":"Valuation is middling but not overvalued like in the past.Recent announcement of capacity expansion in Wuhan lends better operational and sales visibility.Company could breakeven and finally reach positive profits soon; major improvements seen in operating margins.Feared chip shortage  was not a disaster, deliveries are still strong.Government support, China's creation of an EV ecosystem.XPEV's strong deliveries describe not only excellent support from the private sector, but also the Chinese go","content":"<p><b>Summary</b></p>\n<ul>\n <li>Valuation is middling but not overvalued like in the past.</li>\n <li>Recent announcement of capacity expansion in Wuhan lends better operational and sales visibility.</li>\n <li>Company could breakeven and finally reach positive profits soon; major improvements seen in operating margins.</li>\n <li>Feared chip shortage (i.e. supply disruption) was not a disaster, deliveries are still strong.</li>\n</ul>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4e0f3343d69719839f9b8f1d337c3984\" tg-width=\"1536\" tg-height=\"1024\"><span>Photo by Robert Way/iStock Editorial via Getty Images</span></p>\n<p><b>Introduction</b></p>\n<p>The stock price of&nbsp;XPEV&nbsp;has been converging with the performance of the S&amp;P 500 since March 2021, as compared to its massive outperformance in 4Q2020. This could be view positively or negatively. On the bright side, this suggests that price performance would become more predictable with lower volatility, indicative of a broadening consensus on the fundamental prospects of the company. On the other hand, traders may be disappointed its lack of momentum. Therefore, this is probably a good time to stop viewing XPEV as purely a trade, but re-analyze its merits as a fundamentally-driven investment.</p>\n<p><i>The frenetic performance of XPEV has calmed down in recent weeks, allowing its one year performance to track the S&amp;P 500 more closely</i></p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9f04001d604ecc7892ef3a76c498578b\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"236\"><span>Source: SeekingAlpha</span></p>\n<p><i>XPEV's G3 Super Long Range Smart SUV</i></p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/68446a741f9f97afc10f2149c4e13e13\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"388\"><span>Source: XPeng Motors (G3、P7) Intelligent electric car with Internet DNA</span></p>\n<p><b>Industry and commercial positives</b></p>\n<p>Optimism on EVs and&nbsp;strong industry growth&nbsp;rates are common knowledge by now. The following points suggest specific positives for XPEV that remain intact despite relatively ebbing momentum on the stock's price (as compared to 4Q2020):</p>\n<ol>\n <li><b>Deliveries met despite fears on chip shortage.</b>While the stock's price momentum appears to have ebbed, recent news continues to remain positive. At an industry level, Chinese vehicle manufacturers XPEV andNIOmanaged to manufacture the expected numbers of vehicle deliveries, despite much feared chip shortages.XPEV chalked&nbsp;in record quarterly deliveries of 13,340 EVs in Q1 2021, +487% over the year and +130% over the month in March.NIO delivered&nbsp;20,060 +423% over the year while Q1 deliveries rose 15.6% to 20,060. The challenge these EV manufacturers face now is not so much the ability to deliver on its numbers, but on being able to meet high expectations for the stock price to gain further traction.</li>\n <li><b>Government support, China's creation of an EV ecosystem.</b>XPEV's strong deliveries describe not only excellent support from the private sector, but also the Chinese government's push to develop this part of its industry. XPEV has entered into an agreement with the city of Wuhan to build a factory with a capacity of 100,000 EV units. This is a very significant piece of news, considering its deliveries of just 5,102 in March 2021. Annualizing this number, the new capacity will be more than the whole of XPEV's total historical annual production. This news is interesting and significant since it was just released this week, suggesting it may have yet to be factored into analysts' forecast numbers. This is made more important as XPEV has always been considered a laggard in production capabilities to its larger cousin NIO. General Chinese government support for the EV ecosystem is strong, and the new facility in Wuhan echoes earlier provincial government financial support ($77m) in Guangdong. The reality is, for EVs to gain traction, government willingness to support infrastructure initiatives are highly important (e.g. permits for charging stations, creating incentives to convert from old polluting vehicles to green vehicles, etc.). With China's tradition of central planning, the EV ecosystem is placed on the right footing.</li>\n <li><b>Listing in Hong Kong adds to investor base and liquidity.</b>Going forward,XPEV,NIO, and&nbsp;LI&nbsp;intend tolistin Hong Kong this year. This is a strategic move, and makes the valuation of these companies less susceptible by US political bashing (e.g. the threat of being de-listed) should it occur, since it reflects a wider geographical base. The valuations of these companies may even get a boost given greater global liquidity due to added trading in the Asian time zone.</li>\n</ol>\n<p>Of note, in late March, XPEV held an&nbsp;autonomous driving expedition&nbsp;covering eight cities in China and 3,675 kilometers. The exercise was successful, as minimal human intervention was needed during the expedition and adds another brownie point to XPEV's research and development efforts, placing XPEV on the&nbsp;competitive landscape&nbsp;against rivals such as TSLA and NIO on autonomous driving. Apparently, XPEV's autonomous driving results&nbsp;performed better&nbsp;than TSLA's with fewer human interventions per 100km and better navigation in complex situations.</p>\n<p><b>XPEV's improving financials</b></p>\n<p>Now that we have several quarters of financial data on XPEV, it is worth reviewing how its metrics have been performing. Firstly, market expectations aside, deliveries have been very good as abovementioned, and this is flowing through to revenue numbers. As shown in the below table, growth has been very strong, and revenues are expected to more than double in 2021 and continue to double in 2022. Such growth rates place XPEV at the top end of manufacturing firms, as expected of the fast-growing EV market.</p>\n<p>Another point to note is the improvement in operating margins. As with any \"new tech\" company, initial investments would cause hugely negative operating margins in the beginning. What's important is the company's ability to improve margins and reduce costs over time. In this respect, XPEV has done a good job, with operating margins improving sequentially each quarter. Of note, operating margins started to see major improvements between the Jun-2020 (-142%) and Dec-2020 (-39%) quarters as shown in the table below. Given this trend, the company is likely to breakeven and register positive profits soon, which could be a catalytic re-rating for XPEV. When we pair this analysis with the stock price, it appears that XPEV's recently soft stock price performance is not justified.</p>\n<p>Meanwhile, the balance sheet is expected to remain strong. Equity to total liabilities &amp; equity is 23% as at Dec-2020. As abovementioned, further capital raises with a forthcoming Hong Kong listing will add to XPEV's cash buffer.</p>\n<p><i>XPEV's performance improvement in both revenue and operating margin trends appear to have been ignored by the market due to recent the broad market capitulation</i></p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f8258dce0cc10e8118a23afce7655bed\" tg-width=\"726\" tg-height=\"737\"><span>*EST = estimate by analysts' consensus from SeekingAlpha</span></p>\n<p><b>XPEV's valuation: somewhere in the middle</b></p>\n<p>XPEV's stock price has done well over the last 6 months versus peers. On a TTM P/S, XPEV is near the middle although its FWD P/S is trading at a premium. However, there could be a general re-rating of the P/S of the sector if the Chinese EV manufacturers reach breakeven in 2021 and record positive profits (our base case belief, given the prevailing trend in XPEV's improving operating margins). This will then allow better price discovery when the companies can then be valued on their P/E ratios.</p>\n<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fa975ce545e950a20f809bcc7f698ef6\" tg-width=\"911\" tg-height=\"594\">\n<table>\n <tbody>\n  <tr></tr>\n </tbody>\n</table>\n<p><b>Conclusion and Risks</b></p>\n<p>XPEV's stock price may benefit from two key catalysts: (1) expansion of manufacturing facility in Wuhan, which will concretely raise visibility of revenue growth which is expected to double; (2) a valuation regime change as it progresses from a loss making company to a profitable one, expected by this year. Furthermore, it is worth noting that the valuation is not lofty as compared to price levels in 4Q2020, having fallen over the last couple of months.</p>\n<p>Competition may exist and remain intense, but given the large size of China's market and that there are only a couple of notable players (i.e. NIO, LI), the market remains largely an oligopoly which allows XPEV to retain pricing power.</p>\n<p>Much feared risks of execution in the past appear to have materialized but not in a big way, i.e. the previously expected chip shortage. Given the progression to a post-COVID economy, supply chain links should improve and reduce similar risks in the future.</p>\n<p>On a standalone basis, XPEV's prospects appear bright, and now the key hurdle is whether the NASDAQ will find momentum and exceed previous highs. The base case for this should lean towards the positive as the market is merely in the first year of the economic recovery after the pandemic. Recent price consolidation appears to have created a technical setup for a reawakening of price momentum as consumer activity revives post-pandemic.</p>","source":"seekingalpha","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>XPeng Inc.: A Reawakening</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nXPeng Inc.: A Reawakening\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-04-09 23:30 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4418326-xpeng-inc-reawakening><strong>seekingalpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Summary\n\nValuation is middling but not overvalued like in the past.\nRecent announcement of capacity expansion in Wuhan lends better operational and sales visibility.\nCompany could breakeven and ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4418326-xpeng-inc-reawakening\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"XPEV":"小鹏汽车"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4418326-xpeng-inc-reawakening","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5a36db9d73b4222bc376d24ccc48c8a4","article_id":"1142324412","content_text":"Summary\n\nValuation is middling but not overvalued like in the past.\nRecent announcement of capacity expansion in Wuhan lends better operational and sales visibility.\nCompany could breakeven and finally reach positive profits soon; major improvements seen in operating margins.\nFeared chip shortage (i.e. supply disruption) was not a disaster, deliveries are still strong.\n\nPhoto by Robert Way/iStock Editorial via Getty Images\nIntroduction\nThe stock price of XPEV has been converging with the performance of the S&P 500 since March 2021, as compared to its massive outperformance in 4Q2020. This could be view positively or negatively. On the bright side, this suggests that price performance would become more predictable with lower volatility, indicative of a broadening consensus on the fundamental prospects of the company. On the other hand, traders may be disappointed its lack of momentum. Therefore, this is probably a good time to stop viewing XPEV as purely a trade, but re-analyze its merits as a fundamentally-driven investment.\nThe frenetic performance of XPEV has calmed down in recent weeks, allowing its one year performance to track the S&P 500 more closely\nSource: SeekingAlpha\nXPEV's G3 Super Long Range Smart SUV\nSource: XPeng Motors (G3、P7) Intelligent electric car with Internet DNA\nIndustry and commercial positives\nOptimism on EVs and strong industry growth rates are common knowledge by now. The following points suggest specific positives for XPEV that remain intact despite relatively ebbing momentum on the stock's price (as compared to 4Q2020):\n\nDeliveries met despite fears on chip shortage.While the stock's price momentum appears to have ebbed, recent news continues to remain positive. At an industry level, Chinese vehicle manufacturers XPEV andNIOmanaged to manufacture the expected numbers of vehicle deliveries, despite much feared chip shortages.XPEV chalked in record quarterly deliveries of 13,340 EVs in Q1 2021, +487% over the year and +130% over the month in March.NIO delivered 20,060 +423% over the year while Q1 deliveries rose 15.6% to 20,060. The challenge these EV manufacturers face now is not so much the ability to deliver on its numbers, but on being able to meet high expectations for the stock price to gain further traction.\nGovernment support, China's creation of an EV ecosystem.XPEV's strong deliveries describe not only excellent support from the private sector, but also the Chinese government's push to develop this part of its industry. XPEV has entered into an agreement with the city of Wuhan to build a factory with a capacity of 100,000 EV units. This is a very significant piece of news, considering its deliveries of just 5,102 in March 2021. Annualizing this number, the new capacity will be more than the whole of XPEV's total historical annual production. This news is interesting and significant since it was just released this week, suggesting it may have yet to be factored into analysts' forecast numbers. This is made more important as XPEV has always been considered a laggard in production capabilities to its larger cousin NIO. General Chinese government support for the EV ecosystem is strong, and the new facility in Wuhan echoes earlier provincial government financial support ($77m) in Guangdong. The reality is, for EVs to gain traction, government willingness to support infrastructure initiatives are highly important (e.g. permits for charging stations, creating incentives to convert from old polluting vehicles to green vehicles, etc.). With China's tradition of central planning, the EV ecosystem is placed on the right footing.\nListing in Hong Kong adds to investor base and liquidity.Going forward,XPEV,NIO, and LI intend tolistin Hong Kong this year. This is a strategic move, and makes the valuation of these companies less susceptible by US political bashing (e.g. the threat of being de-listed) should it occur, since it reflects a wider geographical base. The valuations of these companies may even get a boost given greater global liquidity due to added trading in the Asian time zone.\n\nOf note, in late March, XPEV held an autonomous driving expedition covering eight cities in China and 3,675 kilometers. The exercise was successful, as minimal human intervention was needed during the expedition and adds another brownie point to XPEV's research and development efforts, placing XPEV on the competitive landscape against rivals such as TSLA and NIO on autonomous driving. Apparently, XPEV's autonomous driving results performed better than TSLA's with fewer human interventions per 100km and better navigation in complex situations.\nXPEV's improving financials\nNow that we have several quarters of financial data on XPEV, it is worth reviewing how its metrics have been performing. Firstly, market expectations aside, deliveries have been very good as abovementioned, and this is flowing through to revenue numbers. As shown in the below table, growth has been very strong, and revenues are expected to more than double in 2021 and continue to double in 2022. Such growth rates place XPEV at the top end of manufacturing firms, as expected of the fast-growing EV market.\nAnother point to note is the improvement in operating margins. As with any \"new tech\" company, initial investments would cause hugely negative operating margins in the beginning. What's important is the company's ability to improve margins and reduce costs over time. In this respect, XPEV has done a good job, with operating margins improving sequentially each quarter. Of note, operating margins started to see major improvements between the Jun-2020 (-142%) and Dec-2020 (-39%) quarters as shown in the table below. Given this trend, the company is likely to breakeven and register positive profits soon, which could be a catalytic re-rating for XPEV. When we pair this analysis with the stock price, it appears that XPEV's recently soft stock price performance is not justified.\nMeanwhile, the balance sheet is expected to remain strong. Equity to total liabilities & equity is 23% as at Dec-2020. As abovementioned, further capital raises with a forthcoming Hong Kong listing will add to XPEV's cash buffer.\nXPEV's performance improvement in both revenue and operating margin trends appear to have been ignored by the market due to recent the broad market capitulation\n*EST = estimate by analysts' consensus from SeekingAlpha\nXPEV's valuation: somewhere in the middle\nXPEV's stock price has done well over the last 6 months versus peers. On a TTM P/S, XPEV is near the middle although its FWD P/S is trading at a premium. However, there could be a general re-rating of the P/S of the sector if the Chinese EV manufacturers reach breakeven in 2021 and record positive profits (our base case belief, given the prevailing trend in XPEV's improving operating margins). This will then allow better price discovery when the companies can then be valued on their P/E ratios.\n\n\n\n\n\n\nConclusion and Risks\nXPEV's stock price may benefit from two key catalysts: (1) expansion of manufacturing facility in Wuhan, which will concretely raise visibility of revenue growth which is expected to double; (2) a valuation regime change as it progresses from a loss making company to a profitable one, expected by this year. Furthermore, it is worth noting that the valuation is not lofty as compared to price levels in 4Q2020, having fallen over the last couple of months.\nCompetition may exist and remain intense, but given the large size of China's market and that there are only a couple of notable players (i.e. NIO, LI), the market remains largely an oligopoly which allows XPEV to retain pricing power.\nMuch feared risks of execution in the past appear to have materialized but not in a big way, i.e. the previously expected chip shortage. Given the progression to a post-COVID economy, supply chain links should improve and reduce similar risks in the future.\nOn a standalone basis, XPEV's prospects appear bright, and now the key hurdle is whether the NASDAQ will find momentum and exceed previous highs. The base case for this should lean towards the positive as the market is merely in the first year of the economic recovery after the pandemic. Recent price consolidation appears to have created a technical setup for a reawakening of price momentum as consumer activity revives post-pandemic.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":96,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9003220243,"gmtCreate":1641000809611,"gmtModify":1676533562116,"author":{"id":"3562919640401993","authorId":"3562919640401993","name":"Jiangbox","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7379f7108480b709cc9a6a874592f0ae","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3562919640401993","authorIdStr":"3562919640401993"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Up more.","listText":"Up more.","text":"Up more.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9003220243","repostId":"2200744536","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2200744536","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1640998320,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2200744536?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-01-01 08:52","market":"us","language":"en","title":"What Happens When the S&P 500 Climbs More Than 25% in a Year? This Chart Shows Midteen Gains Usually Follow","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2200744536","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"No doubt, 2021 has been a stellar year for U.S. stocks.The S&P 500 index  is headed for a stellar 27","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>No doubt, 2021 has been a stellar year for U.S. stocks.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 index  is headed for a stellar 27% annual gain as of Friday, the last day of trade in a year when highly transmissible coronavirus variants have kept the pandemic at the forefront.</p><p>But while such outsized stock-market gains have been fairly rare in the past 70 years, past performance shows that 2022 still could be a robust year for returns, according to a review of historical S&amp;P 500 performance by Truist Advisory Services.</p><p>Indeed, Keith Lerner, co-chief investment officer at Truist, found the S&amp;P 500 has produced at least 25% annual returns (including dividends), only 18 times since 1950. But in the following year, the broad-based index rose 82% of the time, notching average annual gains of 14% (see chart).</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7ece307d4b24390174454721a37fcabf\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"316\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>S&amp;P 500 notched 25%+ annual returns only 18 times since 1950 Truist Advisory Services</span></p><p>&#34;Two(T of the three years where stocks failed to rise, 1981 and 1990, coincided with recessions,&#34; Lerner wrote, in a Friday client note. &#34;Our work suggests near-term recession risk remains low.&#34;</p><p>&#34;The other downside market outlier was 1962, which was challenged by a flash crash and deteriorating investor confidence,&#34; Lerner wrote.</p><p>The coming year will kick off with Federal Reserve monetary policies that remain highly accommodative for financial assets, at least in its first few months. Pandemic support by central banks has been credited with underpinning the global economic recovery, while keeping credit flowing, but also pushing up asset prices to sometimes worrying levels.</p><p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average  was poised for a 19% annual gain for 2021, while the Nasdaq Composite Index  advanced about 22%, according to FactSet.</p><p>Fed Chairman Jerome Powell outlined plans in December to more aggressively reduce the central bank&#39;s hallmark $120 billion in monthly pandemic bond purchases, in a bid to combat inflation that&#39;s touched 1980s levels. It is targeting March as a potential end date for the program, after about two years. The Fed also penciled in three rated hikes in 2022.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>What Happens When the S&P 500 Climbs More Than 25% in a Year? This Chart Shows Midteen Gains Usually Follow</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhat Happens When the S&P 500 Climbs More Than 25% in a Year? This Chart Shows Midteen Gains Usually Follow\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-01-01 08:52</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>No doubt, 2021 has been a stellar year for U.S. stocks.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 index  is headed for a stellar 27% annual gain as of Friday, the last day of trade in a year when highly transmissible coronavirus variants have kept the pandemic at the forefront.</p><p>But while such outsized stock-market gains have been fairly rare in the past 70 years, past performance shows that 2022 still could be a robust year for returns, according to a review of historical S&amp;P 500 performance by Truist Advisory Services.</p><p>Indeed, Keith Lerner, co-chief investment officer at Truist, found the S&amp;P 500 has produced at least 25% annual returns (including dividends), only 18 times since 1950. But in the following year, the broad-based index rose 82% of the time, notching average annual gains of 14% (see chart).</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7ece307d4b24390174454721a37fcabf\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"316\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>S&amp;P 500 notched 25%+ annual returns only 18 times since 1950 Truist Advisory Services</span></p><p>&#34;Two(T of the three years where stocks failed to rise, 1981 and 1990, coincided with recessions,&#34; Lerner wrote, in a Friday client note. &#34;Our work suggests near-term recession risk remains low.&#34;</p><p>&#34;The other downside market outlier was 1962, which was challenged by a flash crash and deteriorating investor confidence,&#34; Lerner wrote.</p><p>The coming year will kick off with Federal Reserve monetary policies that remain highly accommodative for financial assets, at least in its first few months. Pandemic support by central banks has been credited with underpinning the global economic recovery, while keeping credit flowing, but also pushing up asset prices to sometimes worrying levels.</p><p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average  was poised for a 19% annual gain for 2021, while the Nasdaq Composite Index  advanced about 22%, according to FactSet.</p><p>Fed Chairman Jerome Powell outlined plans in December to more aggressively reduce the central bank&#39;s hallmark $120 billion in monthly pandemic bond purchases, in a bid to combat inflation that&#39;s touched 1980s levels. It is targeting March as a potential end date for the program, after about two years. The Fed also penciled in three rated hikes in 2022.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","BK4559":"巴菲特持仓","SPY":"标普500ETF",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓","BK4504":"桥水持仓"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2200744536","content_text":"No doubt, 2021 has been a stellar year for U.S. stocks.The S&P 500 index  is headed for a stellar 27% annual gain as of Friday, the last day of trade in a year when highly transmissible coronavirus variants have kept the pandemic at the forefront.But while such outsized stock-market gains have been fairly rare in the past 70 years, past performance shows that 2022 still could be a robust year for returns, according to a review of historical S&P 500 performance by Truist Advisory Services.Indeed, Keith Lerner, co-chief investment officer at Truist, found the S&P 500 has produced at least 25% annual returns (including dividends), only 18 times since 1950. But in the following year, the broad-based index rose 82% of the time, notching average annual gains of 14% (see chart).S&P 500 notched 25%+ annual returns only 18 times since 1950 Truist Advisory Services\"Two(T of the three years where stocks failed to rise, 1981 and 1990, coincided with recessions,\" Lerner wrote, in a Friday client note. \"Our work suggests near-term recession risk remains low.\"\"The other downside market outlier was 1962, which was challenged by a flash crash and deteriorating investor confidence,\" Lerner wrote.The coming year will kick off with Federal Reserve monetary policies that remain highly accommodative for financial assets, at least in its first few months. Pandemic support by central banks has been credited with underpinning the global economic recovery, while keeping credit flowing, but also pushing up asset prices to sometimes worrying levels.The Dow Jones Industrial Average  was poised for a 19% annual gain for 2021, while the Nasdaq Composite Index  advanced about 22%, according to FactSet.Fed Chairman Jerome Powell outlined plans in December to more aggressively reduce the central bank's hallmark $120 billion in monthly pandemic bond purchases, in a bid to combat inflation that's touched 1980s levels. It is targeting March as a potential end date for the program, after about two years. The Fed also penciled in three rated hikes in 2022.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":306,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9001085733,"gmtCreate":1641104441323,"gmtModify":1676533573022,"author":{"id":"3562919640401993","authorId":"3562919640401993","name":"Jiangbox","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7379f7108480b709cc9a6a874592f0ae","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3562919640401993","authorIdStr":"3562919640401993"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Can buy?","listText":"Can buy?","text":"Can buy?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9001085733","repostId":"2200444738","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2200444738","pubTimestamp":1641099600,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2200444738?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-01-02 13:00","market":"us","language":"en","title":"If I Could Buy Only 1 Stock in 2022, This Would Be It","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2200444738","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Our favorite stock picks for the coming year.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>We&#39;re firm believers in the benefit of owning a diversified portfolio of stocks. However, we all have our favorite stocks.</p><p>We asked some of our Fool.com contributors to whittle their favorites down to their top choice to buy in 2022 if they could only pick <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a>. Here&#39;s why <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MMM\">3M</a></b> (NYSE:MMM), <b>Brookfield Asset Management </b>(NYSE:BAM), and <b>Brookfield Renewable</b> (NYSE:BEP)(NYSE:BEPC) topped their lists as the one stock they&#39;d buy this year. </p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a909bb3cfb7abaedc74cfef9296edc0a\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"423\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>Image source: Getty Images.</span></p><h2>A diversified giant that&#39;s still on sale</h2><p><b>Reuben Gregg Brewer (3M):</b> Benjamin Graham, renowned value investor and mentor to Warren Buffet, explains that investors are partnered with &#34;Mr. Market,&#34; a mercurial fellow prone to fits of despair and jubilation. When he&#39;s overly excited, you should consider selling to him; when he&#39;s pessimistic, you should think about buying. Right now, Mr. Market is very downbeat on diversified international industrial giant 3M. One way to see this is that the company&#39;s dividend yield, at around 3.3%, is near the top end of its historical range.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/35404c30dd22bffd6cc4a1450aa485c9\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"433\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>MMM Dividend Yield data by YCharts</span></p><p>Graham had some other advice when it came to actually selecting stocks. Specifically, he argued that most investors would be wise sticking to large, financially strong companies, with strong dividend histories. 3M stacks up well on these measures. It has a market cap of $100 billion, which makes it a mega-cap stock. Its balance sheet is investment-grade rated by the major credit agencies, so it&#39;s financially strong. And it has increased its dividend annually for over 60 years, making it a very elite Dividend King.</p><p>So why is Mr. Market pessimistic? The answer is a mixture of slowing growth and some product and environmental lawsuits. These are notable problems, but they&#39;re not insurmountable. On the business front, the industrial giant&#39;s operations wax and wane over time just like any other company. Given its history and focus on innovation, it should eventually get back on a better track. As for the lawsuits, they could be costly, but it&#39;s likely that 3M will be able to handle the hit. In the end, this is an attractively priced name with a great history that is dealing with issues that seem transitory.</p><h2>A proven value creator</h2><p><b>Matt DiLallo (Brookfield Asset Management):</b> I like to invest. Because of that, I routinely purchase a variety of stocks. However, if I could only buy one in the coming year, Brookfield Asset Management would be my top choice.</p><p>For starters, I love the company&#39;s management. CEO Bruce Flatt is a personal favorite of mine. He&#39;s right up there with Warren Buffett in my book as one of the best value investors around. I enjoy reading his quarterly letter to shareholders, which Flatt fills with investing and economic insight. He&#39;s also a proven value creator. Since becoming CEO in 2002, he&#39;s helped Brookfield deliver a 15.7% total annualized return, pulverizing the <b>S&amp;P 500</b>&#39;s 10.6% total return during that time frame. </p><p>I also like the company&#39;s business model. Brookfield is a leading global alternative asset manager focused on real estate, infrastructure, and renewable energy -- three of my favorite investing themes. An investment in Brookfield provides broad exposure to those three asset classes and many more. Brookfield invests directly across those themes and manages private equity funds focused on those sectors.</p><p>Finally, Brookfield has enormous upside potential. It expects to double its fee-bearing assets under management over the next five years. Combine that with performance-based earnings on its funds and the compounding value of its balance sheet investments, and it has the potential of generating up to 25% annualized total returns over the next five years. That upside, along with all the other positives, is why I&#39;d buy Brookfield if it were the only stock I could purchase this year. </p><h2>Investors are overlooking the growth potential here</h2><p><b>Neha Chamaria</b> <b>(Brookfield Renewable)</b>: 2021 is turning out to be a record-setting year for global renewable electricity addition, but this could just be the beginning. Yet shares of one of the largest pure-play renewables companies that&#39;s growing at a steady pace have languished this year, which is why Brookfield Renewable would be at the top of my shopping list of stocks to buy in 2022.</p><p>Brookfield Renewable, in fact, generated record funds from operations (FFO) in its third quarter and believes it could grow FFO by nearly 20% per year through 2026 through a combination of organic and inorganic growth. 2021 was also a solid year in terms of growth initiatives, with Brookfield Renewable expanding its U.S. distributed-generation business by nearly five times, signing agreements to acquire multiple late-stage solar development projects in the U.S. and even making meaningful headway in the high-potential green hydrogen space.</p><p>Brookfield Renewable&#39;s current development pipeline is larger than ever, and the company is committed to growing dividends annually by 5% to 9%. That shouldn&#39;t be tough given the solid pace of growth in its FFO. That dividend growth, its dividend yield of 3.4%, and the humongous growth potential in renewable energy are the biggest reasons why I consider Brookfield Renewable a top stock for 2022.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>If I Could Buy Only 1 Stock in 2022, This Would Be It</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nIf I Could Buy Only 1 Stock in 2022, This Would Be It\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-01-02 13:00 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/01/01/if-i-could-buy-only-1-stock-in-2022-this-would-be/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>We're firm believers in the benefit of owning a diversified portfolio of stocks. However, we all have our favorite stocks.We asked some of our Fool.com contributors to whittle their favorites down to ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/01/01/if-i-could-buy-only-1-stock-in-2022-this-would-be/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BK4135":"资产管理与托管银行","BK4206":"工业集团企业","BEPC":"Brookfield Renewable Corp.","MMM":"3M","BAM":"布鲁克菲尔德资产管理","BEP":"Brookfield Renewable Partners LP","BK4133":"新能源发电业者","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","BK4512":"苹果概念","BK4533":"AQR资本管理(全球第二大对冲基金)"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/01/01/if-i-could-buy-only-1-stock-in-2022-this-would-be/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2200444738","content_text":"We're firm believers in the benefit of owning a diversified portfolio of stocks. However, we all have our favorite stocks.We asked some of our Fool.com contributors to whittle their favorites down to their top choice to buy in 2022 if they could only pick one. Here's why 3M (NYSE:MMM), Brookfield Asset Management (NYSE:BAM), and Brookfield Renewable (NYSE:BEP)(NYSE:BEPC) topped their lists as the one stock they'd buy this year. Image source: Getty Images.A diversified giant that's still on saleReuben Gregg Brewer (3M): Benjamin Graham, renowned value investor and mentor to Warren Buffet, explains that investors are partnered with \"Mr. Market,\" a mercurial fellow prone to fits of despair and jubilation. When he's overly excited, you should consider selling to him; when he's pessimistic, you should think about buying. Right now, Mr. Market is very downbeat on diversified international industrial giant 3M. One way to see this is that the company's dividend yield, at around 3.3%, is near the top end of its historical range.MMM Dividend Yield data by YChartsGraham had some other advice when it came to actually selecting stocks. Specifically, he argued that most investors would be wise sticking to large, financially strong companies, with strong dividend histories. 3M stacks up well on these measures. It has a market cap of $100 billion, which makes it a mega-cap stock. Its balance sheet is investment-grade rated by the major credit agencies, so it's financially strong. And it has increased its dividend annually for over 60 years, making it a very elite Dividend King.So why is Mr. Market pessimistic? The answer is a mixture of slowing growth and some product and environmental lawsuits. These are notable problems, but they're not insurmountable. On the business front, the industrial giant's operations wax and wane over time just like any other company. Given its history and focus on innovation, it should eventually get back on a better track. As for the lawsuits, they could be costly, but it's likely that 3M will be able to handle the hit. In the end, this is an attractively priced name with a great history that is dealing with issues that seem transitory.A proven value creatorMatt DiLallo (Brookfield Asset Management): I like to invest. Because of that, I routinely purchase a variety of stocks. However, if I could only buy one in the coming year, Brookfield Asset Management would be my top choice.For starters, I love the company's management. CEO Bruce Flatt is a personal favorite of mine. He's right up there with Warren Buffett in my book as one of the best value investors around. I enjoy reading his quarterly letter to shareholders, which Flatt fills with investing and economic insight. He's also a proven value creator. Since becoming CEO in 2002, he's helped Brookfield deliver a 15.7% total annualized return, pulverizing the S&P 500's 10.6% total return during that time frame. I also like the company's business model. Brookfield is a leading global alternative asset manager focused on real estate, infrastructure, and renewable energy -- three of my favorite investing themes. An investment in Brookfield provides broad exposure to those three asset classes and many more. Brookfield invests directly across those themes and manages private equity funds focused on those sectors.Finally, Brookfield has enormous upside potential. It expects to double its fee-bearing assets under management over the next five years. Combine that with performance-based earnings on its funds and the compounding value of its balance sheet investments, and it has the potential of generating up to 25% annualized total returns over the next five years. That upside, along with all the other positives, is why I'd buy Brookfield if it were the only stock I could purchase this year. Investors are overlooking the growth potential hereNeha Chamaria (Brookfield Renewable): 2021 is turning out to be a record-setting year for global renewable electricity addition, but this could just be the beginning. Yet shares of one of the largest pure-play renewables companies that's growing at a steady pace have languished this year, which is why Brookfield Renewable would be at the top of my shopping list of stocks to buy in 2022.Brookfield Renewable, in fact, generated record funds from operations (FFO) in its third quarter and believes it could grow FFO by nearly 20% per year through 2026 through a combination of organic and inorganic growth. 2021 was also a solid year in terms of growth initiatives, with Brookfield Renewable expanding its U.S. distributed-generation business by nearly five times, signing agreements to acquire multiple late-stage solar development projects in the U.S. and even making meaningful headway in the high-potential green hydrogen space.Brookfield Renewable's current development pipeline is larger than ever, and the company is committed to growing dividends annually by 5% to 9%. That shouldn't be tough given the solid pace of growth in its FFO. That dividend growth, its dividend yield of 3.4%, and the humongous growth potential in renewable energy are the biggest reasons why I consider Brookfield Renewable a top stock for 2022.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":473,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9003229578,"gmtCreate":1641000934805,"gmtModify":1676533562147,"author":{"id":"3562919640401993","authorId":"3562919640401993","name":"Jiangbox","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7379f7108480b709cc9a6a874592f0ae","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3562919640401993","authorIdStr":"3562919640401993"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Up more.","listText":"Up more.","text":"Up more.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9003229578","repostId":"1114332157","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1114332157","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1640995557,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1114332157?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-01-01 08:05","market":"us","language":"en","title":"U.S. Stocks End Lower on New Year’s Eve, but S&P 500, Dow, Nasdaq Score Big Gains for 2021","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1114332157","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"S&P 500 gains about 27% this year, its best yearly advance since 2019.Major U.S. stock indexes close","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>S&amp;P 500 gains about 27% this year, its best yearly advance since 2019.</p><p>Major U.S. stock indexes closed lower Friday, as risk appetite waned on <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NGD\">New</a> Year’s Eve, but the S&amp;P 500, Dow Jones Industrial Average and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NDAQ\">Nasdaq</a> Composite all closed out the month, quarter and year with gains despite the pandemic.</p><p><b>How did stock benchmarks trade?</b></p><p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 59.78 points, or 0.2%, to close at 36,338.30.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 SPX slipped 12.55 points, or 0.3%, to finish at 4,766.18.</p><p>The Nasdaq Composite Index dropped 96.59 points, or 0.6%, to end at 15,644.97.</p><p>On Thursday, the Dow closed down 90.55 points, or 0.3%, to 36,398.08, the S&amp;P 500 index fell 14.33 points, or 0.3%, to close at 4,778.73, the Nasdaq Composite Index declined 24.65 points to 15,741.56, a 0.2% loss.</p><p>For the week, the Dow logged a 1.1% gain, the S&amp;P 500 rose 0.9% and the Nasdaq shed about 0.1%. For December, the Dow gained 5.4%, the S&amp;P 500 climbed 4.4% and the Nasdaq edged up 0.7%. All three benchmarks also booked gains for the fourth quarter, with the Dow climbing 7.4%, the S&amp;P 500 jumping 10.7% and the Nasdaq advancing 8.3%.</p><p>For 2021, the S&amp;P 500 soared 26.9%, beating both the Nasdaq’s 21.4% rise and the Dow’s 18.7% climb.</p><p><b>What drove the market?</b></p><p>Major U.S. stock indexes fell in the final trading session of the year, as market participants closed out their trading logs for 2021, but the S&amp;P 500 and Dow remained less 1% off their record highs. They also scored their best yearly gains since 2019, before the pandemic disrupted daily life across the globe.</p><p>“Today should be a relatively quiet day,” said Matthew Bartolini, head of SPDR Americas Research at <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/STT\">State</a> Street Global Advisors, in a phone interview Friday morning. Trading is thin, he said, with “more market movements” potentially coming toward the end of the day as investors closed out their positions for the year.</p><p>Thinner holiday volumes meant potential choppiness in the action in the final session of 2021, following a strong start to the past week of December, as investors assessed the path ahead for markets, a path that has been colored by a global pandemic that already has lasted about two years.</p><p>Despite recent dips, both the Dow and the S&amp;P 500 posted record-high closes this week, with the rise for equities supported by the belief that disruptions from the omicron variant that causes COVID-19 won’t be lasting.</p><p>The seven-day average of COVID-19 cases in the U.S. has risen at a parabolic pace to 344,543 on Thursday, up from 301,477 on Wednesday, which is up about fourfold since Dec. 1 and 37% above the January 2021 daily peak of 251,232, according to a <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NYT\">New York Times</a> tracker. Hospitalizations also kept climbing, but at a slower pace, as the daily average reached 81,847 on Thursday.</p><p>Airlines canceled hundreds of flights Thursday because of labor shortages after thousands were scrubbed during the Christmas weekend, while the Federal Aviation Administration warned of possible delays tied to the virus at the agency. Also, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has recommended that Americans avoid taking cruises, whether they are vaccinated or not.</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/JPM\">JPMorgan Chase</a> &amp; Co. is <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> prominent bank that has offered its employees the option of working from home to start 2022. The money-center bank run by Jamie Dimon is “allowing for more flexibility during the first two weeks of January to work from home (if your role allows) at your manager’s discretion,” Bloomberg reported, citing a Thursday memo to employees.</p><p>However, in South Africa, where the omicron variant of COVID was first identified, the government said the country’s latest viral wave had subsided and it would be easing restrictions. In the U.S., while daily COVID cases soared to a record high, the CDC said that hospitalizations or deaths as a result of omicron are comparatively low. And White House medical expert Anthony Fauci has said that he is expecting the omicron outbreak to peak by the end of January.</p><p>There was no U.S. economic data scheduled for release due to the New Year’s Eve holiday and the bond market closed an hour earlier at 2 p.m. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/EML\">Eastern</a> <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TIME\">Time</a> on Friday.</p><p>The U.S. stock market’s strong performance in 2021 has been driven by corporate earnings growth, said State Street’s Bartolini, with the S&amp;P 500 index scoring a third straight year of double-digit gains.</p><p>“I think everyone just kinda wants to close out the year on a good note,” he said. “Market returns aside, it’s been quite a turbulent year.”</p><p><b>Which companies were in focus?</b></p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AEIS\">Advanced</a> Micro Devices Inc. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMD\">AMD</a> said Thursday that its acquisition of fellow semiconductor company <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/XLNX\">Xilinx</a> Inc. XLNX would not close by the end of 2021, but that it expects the deal to be sealed early in the new year. Shares of AMD and Xilinx closed 0.9% lower Friday.</p><p>Shares of Zepp Health Corp. ZEPP were flat, after the <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CAAS\">China</a>-based smart health technology company cut its fourth-quarter revenue outlook, citing a “greater than anticipated effects of COVID” and a more persistent global shortage of semiconductors.</p><p>The U.K. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MDCO\">Medicines</a> and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/HCSG\">Healthcare</a> products Regulatory Agency said it has approved <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PFE\">Pfizer</a>’s PFE Paxlovid oral antiviral for people with mild to moderate COVID-19 who have at least one risk factor for developing severe illness. Shares of Pfizer rose 1.1%.</p><p><b>How did other assets fare?</b></p><p>The yield on the 10-year Treasury note was trading around 1.496%, marking its biggest yearly yield climb since 2013.</p><p>The ICE U.S. Dollar Index, a measure of the currency against a basket of six major rivals, fell 0.3%.</p><p>Oil futures fell, with <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/WSTC\">West</a> Texas Intermediate crude for February delivery declining 2.3% to settle at $75.21 a barrel. WTI rose more than 55% in 2021, its largely annual gain in 12 years.</p><p>Gold futures for February delivery GCG22 rose 0.8% to settle at $1,828.60 an ounce Friday. The precious metal fell 3.6% in 2021.</p><p>Bitcoin was up 1.7% at $47,985.</p><p>The FTSE 10 fell about 0.2% Friday, but ended the year with gains of 14.3%. The Stoxx Europe declined 0.2% Friday and posted gains of around 22.2% for 2021.</p><p>In Asian trade, the Shanghai Composite ended 0.6% higher Friday, logging a 4.8% gain for the year. The Hang Seng Index HSI climbed 1.2% Friday, but remained down 14.1% for the year. China’s CSI 300 booked a 0.4% advance Friday, but lost 5.2% for the year. The NIKKEI 225 index gained 4.9% in 2021, with Japan’s market closed on Friday.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>U.S. Stocks End Lower on New Year’s Eve, but S&P 500, Dow, Nasdaq Score Big Gains for 2021</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nU.S. Stocks End Lower on New Year’s Eve, but S&P 500, Dow, Nasdaq Score Big Gains for 2021\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-01-01 08:05</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>S&amp;P 500 gains about 27% this year, its best yearly advance since 2019.</p><p>Major U.S. stock indexes closed lower Friday, as risk appetite waned on <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NGD\">New</a> Year’s Eve, but the S&amp;P 500, Dow Jones Industrial Average and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NDAQ\">Nasdaq</a> Composite all closed out the month, quarter and year with gains despite the pandemic.</p><p><b>How did stock benchmarks trade?</b></p><p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 59.78 points, or 0.2%, to close at 36,338.30.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 SPX slipped 12.55 points, or 0.3%, to finish at 4,766.18.</p><p>The Nasdaq Composite Index dropped 96.59 points, or 0.6%, to end at 15,644.97.</p><p>On Thursday, the Dow closed down 90.55 points, or 0.3%, to 36,398.08, the S&amp;P 500 index fell 14.33 points, or 0.3%, to close at 4,778.73, the Nasdaq Composite Index declined 24.65 points to 15,741.56, a 0.2% loss.</p><p>For the week, the Dow logged a 1.1% gain, the S&amp;P 500 rose 0.9% and the Nasdaq shed about 0.1%. For December, the Dow gained 5.4%, the S&amp;P 500 climbed 4.4% and the Nasdaq edged up 0.7%. All three benchmarks also booked gains for the fourth quarter, with the Dow climbing 7.4%, the S&amp;P 500 jumping 10.7% and the Nasdaq advancing 8.3%.</p><p>For 2021, the S&amp;P 500 soared 26.9%, beating both the Nasdaq’s 21.4% rise and the Dow’s 18.7% climb.</p><p><b>What drove the market?</b></p><p>Major U.S. stock indexes fell in the final trading session of the year, as market participants closed out their trading logs for 2021, but the S&amp;P 500 and Dow remained less 1% off their record highs. They also scored their best yearly gains since 2019, before the pandemic disrupted daily life across the globe.</p><p>“Today should be a relatively quiet day,” said Matthew Bartolini, head of SPDR Americas Research at <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/STT\">State</a> Street Global Advisors, in a phone interview Friday morning. Trading is thin, he said, with “more market movements” potentially coming toward the end of the day as investors closed out their positions for the year.</p><p>Thinner holiday volumes meant potential choppiness in the action in the final session of 2021, following a strong start to the past week of December, as investors assessed the path ahead for markets, a path that has been colored by a global pandemic that already has lasted about two years.</p><p>Despite recent dips, both the Dow and the S&amp;P 500 posted record-high closes this week, with the rise for equities supported by the belief that disruptions from the omicron variant that causes COVID-19 won’t be lasting.</p><p>The seven-day average of COVID-19 cases in the U.S. has risen at a parabolic pace to 344,543 on Thursday, up from 301,477 on Wednesday, which is up about fourfold since Dec. 1 and 37% above the January 2021 daily peak of 251,232, according to a <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NYT\">New York Times</a> tracker. Hospitalizations also kept climbing, but at a slower pace, as the daily average reached 81,847 on Thursday.</p><p>Airlines canceled hundreds of flights Thursday because of labor shortages after thousands were scrubbed during the Christmas weekend, while the Federal Aviation Administration warned of possible delays tied to the virus at the agency. Also, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has recommended that Americans avoid taking cruises, whether they are vaccinated or not.</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/JPM\">JPMorgan Chase</a> &amp; Co. is <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> prominent bank that has offered its employees the option of working from home to start 2022. The money-center bank run by Jamie Dimon is “allowing for more flexibility during the first two weeks of January to work from home (if your role allows) at your manager’s discretion,” Bloomberg reported, citing a Thursday memo to employees.</p><p>However, in South Africa, where the omicron variant of COVID was first identified, the government said the country’s latest viral wave had subsided and it would be easing restrictions. In the U.S., while daily COVID cases soared to a record high, the CDC said that hospitalizations or deaths as a result of omicron are comparatively low. And White House medical expert Anthony Fauci has said that he is expecting the omicron outbreak to peak by the end of January.</p><p>There was no U.S. economic data scheduled for release due to the New Year’s Eve holiday and the bond market closed an hour earlier at 2 p.m. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/EML\">Eastern</a> <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TIME\">Time</a> on Friday.</p><p>The U.S. stock market’s strong performance in 2021 has been driven by corporate earnings growth, said State Street’s Bartolini, with the S&amp;P 500 index scoring a third straight year of double-digit gains.</p><p>“I think everyone just kinda wants to close out the year on a good note,” he said. “Market returns aside, it’s been quite a turbulent year.”</p><p><b>Which companies were in focus?</b></p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AEIS\">Advanced</a> Micro Devices Inc. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMD\">AMD</a> said Thursday that its acquisition of fellow semiconductor company <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/XLNX\">Xilinx</a> Inc. XLNX would not close by the end of 2021, but that it expects the deal to be sealed early in the new year. Shares of AMD and Xilinx closed 0.9% lower Friday.</p><p>Shares of Zepp Health Corp. ZEPP were flat, after the <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CAAS\">China</a>-based smart health technology company cut its fourth-quarter revenue outlook, citing a “greater than anticipated effects of COVID” and a more persistent global shortage of semiconductors.</p><p>The U.K. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MDCO\">Medicines</a> and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/HCSG\">Healthcare</a> products Regulatory Agency said it has approved <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PFE\">Pfizer</a>’s PFE Paxlovid oral antiviral for people with mild to moderate COVID-19 who have at least one risk factor for developing severe illness. Shares of Pfizer rose 1.1%.</p><p><b>How did other assets fare?</b></p><p>The yield on the 10-year Treasury note was trading around 1.496%, marking its biggest yearly yield climb since 2013.</p><p>The ICE U.S. Dollar Index, a measure of the currency against a basket of six major rivals, fell 0.3%.</p><p>Oil futures fell, with <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/WSTC\">West</a> Texas Intermediate crude for February delivery declining 2.3% to settle at $75.21 a barrel. WTI rose more than 55% in 2021, its largely annual gain in 12 years.</p><p>Gold futures for February delivery GCG22 rose 0.8% to settle at $1,828.60 an ounce Friday. The precious metal fell 3.6% in 2021.</p><p>Bitcoin was up 1.7% at $47,985.</p><p>The FTSE 10 fell about 0.2% Friday, but ended the year with gains of 14.3%. The Stoxx Europe declined 0.2% Friday and posted gains of around 22.2% for 2021.</p><p>In Asian trade, the Shanghai Composite ended 0.6% higher Friday, logging a 4.8% gain for the year. The Hang Seng Index HSI climbed 1.2% Friday, but remained down 14.1% for the year. China’s CSI 300 booked a 0.4% advance Friday, but lost 5.2% for the year. The NIKKEI 225 index gained 4.9% in 2021, with Japan’s market closed on Friday.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"161125":"标普500","513500":"标普500ETF","IVV":"标普500指数ETF","BK4504":"桥水持仓","SPXU":"三倍做空标普500ETF","SDS":"两倍做空标普500ETF","UPRO":"三倍做多标普500ETF","BK4017":"黄金","BK4559":"巴菲特持仓","OEF":"标普100指数ETF-iShares","SPY":"标普500ETF","SH":"标普500反向ETF","OEX":"标普100",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","SSO":"两倍做多标普500ETF","NGD":"New Gold","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1114332157","content_text":"S&P 500 gains about 27% this year, its best yearly advance since 2019.Major U.S. stock indexes closed lower Friday, as risk appetite waned on New Year’s Eve, but the S&P 500, Dow Jones Industrial Average and Nasdaq Composite all closed out the month, quarter and year with gains despite the pandemic.How did stock benchmarks trade?The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 59.78 points, or 0.2%, to close at 36,338.30.The S&P 500 SPX slipped 12.55 points, or 0.3%, to finish at 4,766.18.The Nasdaq Composite Index dropped 96.59 points, or 0.6%, to end at 15,644.97.On Thursday, the Dow closed down 90.55 points, or 0.3%, to 36,398.08, the S&P 500 index fell 14.33 points, or 0.3%, to close at 4,778.73, the Nasdaq Composite Index declined 24.65 points to 15,741.56, a 0.2% loss.For the week, the Dow logged a 1.1% gain, the S&P 500 rose 0.9% and the Nasdaq shed about 0.1%. For December, the Dow gained 5.4%, the S&P 500 climbed 4.4% and the Nasdaq edged up 0.7%. All three benchmarks also booked gains for the fourth quarter, with the Dow climbing 7.4%, the S&P 500 jumping 10.7% and the Nasdaq advancing 8.3%.For 2021, the S&P 500 soared 26.9%, beating both the Nasdaq’s 21.4% rise and the Dow’s 18.7% climb.What drove the market?Major U.S. stock indexes fell in the final trading session of the year, as market participants closed out their trading logs for 2021, but the S&P 500 and Dow remained less 1% off their record highs. They also scored their best yearly gains since 2019, before the pandemic disrupted daily life across the globe.“Today should be a relatively quiet day,” said Matthew Bartolini, head of SPDR Americas Research at State Street Global Advisors, in a phone interview Friday morning. Trading is thin, he said, with “more market movements” potentially coming toward the end of the day as investors closed out their positions for the year.Thinner holiday volumes meant potential choppiness in the action in the final session of 2021, following a strong start to the past week of December, as investors assessed the path ahead for markets, a path that has been colored by a global pandemic that already has lasted about two years.Despite recent dips, both the Dow and the S&P 500 posted record-high closes this week, with the rise for equities supported by the belief that disruptions from the omicron variant that causes COVID-19 won’t be lasting.The seven-day average of COVID-19 cases in the U.S. has risen at a parabolic pace to 344,543 on Thursday, up from 301,477 on Wednesday, which is up about fourfold since Dec. 1 and 37% above the January 2021 daily peak of 251,232, according to a New York Times tracker. Hospitalizations also kept climbing, but at a slower pace, as the daily average reached 81,847 on Thursday.Airlines canceled hundreds of flights Thursday because of labor shortages after thousands were scrubbed during the Christmas weekend, while the Federal Aviation Administration warned of possible delays tied to the virus at the agency. Also, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has recommended that Americans avoid taking cruises, whether they are vaccinated or not.JPMorgan Chase & Co. is one prominent bank that has offered its employees the option of working from home to start 2022. The money-center bank run by Jamie Dimon is “allowing for more flexibility during the first two weeks of January to work from home (if your role allows) at your manager’s discretion,” Bloomberg reported, citing a Thursday memo to employees.However, in South Africa, where the omicron variant of COVID was first identified, the government said the country’s latest viral wave had subsided and it would be easing restrictions. In the U.S., while daily COVID cases soared to a record high, the CDC said that hospitalizations or deaths as a result of omicron are comparatively low. And White House medical expert Anthony Fauci has said that he is expecting the omicron outbreak to peak by the end of January.There was no U.S. economic data scheduled for release due to the New Year’s Eve holiday and the bond market closed an hour earlier at 2 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday.The U.S. stock market’s strong performance in 2021 has been driven by corporate earnings growth, said State Street’s Bartolini, with the S&P 500 index scoring a third straight year of double-digit gains.“I think everyone just kinda wants to close out the year on a good note,” he said. “Market returns aside, it’s been quite a turbulent year.”Which companies were in focus?Advanced Micro Devices Inc. AMD said Thursday that its acquisition of fellow semiconductor company Xilinx Inc. XLNX would not close by the end of 2021, but that it expects the deal to be sealed early in the new year. Shares of AMD and Xilinx closed 0.9% lower Friday.Shares of Zepp Health Corp. ZEPP were flat, after the China-based smart health technology company cut its fourth-quarter revenue outlook, citing a “greater than anticipated effects of COVID” and a more persistent global shortage of semiconductors.The U.K. Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency said it has approved Pfizer’s PFE Paxlovid oral antiviral for people with mild to moderate COVID-19 who have at least one risk factor for developing severe illness. Shares of Pfizer rose 1.1%.How did other assets fare?The yield on the 10-year Treasury note was trading around 1.496%, marking its biggest yearly yield climb since 2013.The ICE U.S. Dollar Index, a measure of the currency against a basket of six major rivals, fell 0.3%.Oil futures fell, with West Texas Intermediate crude for February delivery declining 2.3% to settle at $75.21 a barrel. WTI rose more than 55% in 2021, its largely annual gain in 12 years.Gold futures for February delivery GCG22 rose 0.8% to settle at $1,828.60 an ounce Friday. The precious metal fell 3.6% in 2021.Bitcoin was up 1.7% at $47,985.The FTSE 10 fell about 0.2% Friday, but ended the year with gains of 14.3%. The Stoxx Europe declined 0.2% Friday and posted gains of around 22.2% for 2021.In Asian trade, the Shanghai Composite ended 0.6% higher Friday, logging a 4.8% gain for the year. The Hang Seng Index HSI climbed 1.2% Friday, but remained down 14.1% for the year. China’s CSI 300 booked a 0.4% advance Friday, but lost 5.2% for the year. The NIKKEI 225 index gained 4.9% in 2021, with Japan’s market closed on Friday.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":380,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":165771708,"gmtCreate":1624159522004,"gmtModify":1703829781774,"author":{"id":"3562919640401993","authorId":"3562919640401993","name":"Jiangbox","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7379f7108480b709cc9a6a874592f0ae","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3562919640401993","authorIdStr":"3562919640401993"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Apple can keep for long term.","listText":"Apple can keep for long term.","text":"Apple can keep for long term.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/165771708","repostId":"1183124175","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1183124175","pubTimestamp":1624151620,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1183124175?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-20 09:13","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Beware these risky tech stocks in your portfolio, strategist Parker warns","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1183124175","media":"cnbc","summary":"As investors cycle back into growth stocks, one market strategist warns against certain technology names he believes are high risk.Growth stocks are shares of companies expected to grow at a faster rate than the rest of the market. However, these names are typically riskier and more volatile than the average stock.Adam Parker, former Morgan Stanley chief U.S. equity strategist and founder of Trivariate Research, said the time is right to buy growth shares, but investors should be cautious of a f","content":"<div>\n<p>As investors cycle back into growth stocks, one market strategist warns against certain technology names he believes are high risk.\nGrowth stocks are shares of companies expected to grow at a faster ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/06/19/tech-stocks-strategist-warns-of-risky-names.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"cnbc_highlight","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Beware these risky tech stocks in your portfolio, strategist Parker warns</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBeware these risky tech stocks in your portfolio, strategist Parker warns\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-06-20 09:13 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.cnbc.com/2021/06/19/tech-stocks-strategist-warns-of-risky-names.html><strong>cnbc</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>As investors cycle back into growth stocks, one market strategist warns against certain technology names he believes are high risk.\nGrowth stocks are shares of companies expected to grow at a faster ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/06/19/tech-stocks-strategist-warns-of-risky-names.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果","MCHP":"微芯科技","NVDA":"英伟达","SQ":"Block","TWLO":"Twilio Inc"},"source_url":"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/06/19/tech-stocks-strategist-warns-of-risky-names.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/72bb72e1b84c09fca865c6dcb1bbcd16","article_id":"1183124175","content_text":"As investors cycle back into growth stocks, one market strategist warns against certain technology names he believes are high risk.\nGrowth stocks are shares of companies expected to grow at a faster rate than the rest of the market. However, these names are typically riskier and more volatile than the average stock.\nAdam Parker, former Morgan Stanley chief U.S. equity strategist and founder of Trivariate Research, said the time is right to buy growth shares, but investors should be cautious of a few.\n“We think that portfolio managers should be buying growth stocks again, focusing on positive free cash flow and margin expansion, not earnings-based valuation,” Parker said in a note released Wednesday.\nTrivariate Research used a number of criteria to identify risky stocks, including low or negative correlation to inflation, high correlation to the economic reopening and high levels of company insiders selling their shares. The research firm then identified the eight riskiest names based on those measures.\n“Our view is that these are among the riskiest stocks to own today, so investors who own these names should have disproportionate upside to their base cases to compensate them for these risks,” Parker said.\nTake a look at five of the riskiest technology stocks, according to Trivariate.\nRISKIEST TECH STOCKS, ACCORDING TO TRIVARIATE\n\n\n\nTICKER\nCOMPANY\nPRICE\n%CHANGE\n\n\n\n\nMCHP\nMicrochip Technology Inc\n145.62\n-3.0686\n\n\nTWLO\nTwilio Inc\n367.61\n1.84\n\n\nSQ\nSquare Inc\n237.05\n0.39\n\n\nNVDA\nNVIDIA Corp\n745.55\n-0.0992\n\n\nAAPL\nApple Inc\n130.46\n-1.0092\n\n\n\nApple is on Trivariate’s list of riskiest stocks. The research firm identifies Apple as one of the stocks with the most negative correlation to inflation. Trivariate predicts that if bond yields rise or if fears of inflation continue, shares of Apple will underperform the market.\nNvidiaalso makes the list of risky tech stocks. Trivariate found the semiconductor stock has one of the most asymmetric beta — meaning the stock is consistently more volatile than the broader market during a market pullback compared with typical times.\nTrivariate also named payments companySquare, cloud communications platformTwilioand semiconductor manufacturerMicrochip Technologyamong the riskiest technology stocks.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":428,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":133188893,"gmtCreate":1621727944912,"gmtModify":1704361711663,"author":{"id":"3562919640401993","authorId":"3562919640401993","name":"Jiangbox","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7379f7108480b709cc9a6a874592f0ae","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3562919640401993","authorIdStr":"3562919640401993"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hold for life","listText":"Hold for life","text":"Hold for life","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/133188893","repostId":"1197544614","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":26,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":168786621,"gmtCreate":1623983991563,"gmtModify":1703825531303,"author":{"id":"3562919640401993","authorId":"3562919640401993","name":"Jiangbox","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7379f7108480b709cc9a6a874592f0ae","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3562919640401993","authorIdStr":"3562919640401993"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Nio is on uptrend, target price 60.","listText":"Nio is on uptrend, target price 60.","text":"Nio is on uptrend, target price 60.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/168786621","repostId":"1148576248","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1148576248","pubTimestamp":1623979883,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1148576248?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-18 09:31","market":"us","language":"en","title":"NIO Is Winning","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1148576248","media":"seekingalpha","summary":"NIO is #1 in China's electric SUV market for good reason.The company's success is driven by its brilliant innovations and marketing strategy.NIO is growing faster than Tesla, and yet, it is trading at a discount.NIO Inc.  stands out for its strong market position- #1 market share in electric SUV in China- and innovation in the rapidly growing and highly competitive electric vehicle industry. This article will discuss why NIO is winning against some stiff competition, including against Tesla .In ","content":"<p><b>Summary</b></p>\n<ul>\n <li>NIO is #1 in China's electric SUV market for good reason.</li>\n <li>The company's success is driven by its brilliant innovations and marketing strategy.</li>\n <li>NIO is growing faster than Tesla, and yet, it is trading at a discount.</li>\n</ul>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/790fae23b830463fec748d2deb2ce336\" tg-width=\"1536\" tg-height=\"1024\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>PonyWang/E+ via Getty Images</span></p>\n<p>NIO Inc. (NYSE:NIO) stands out for its strong market position- #1 market share in electric SUV in China- and innovation in the rapidly growing and highly competitive electric vehicle industry. This article will discuss why NIO is winning against some stiff competition, including against Tesla (TSLA).</p>\n<p>In addition, we will discuss NIO's business, financials, trading, valuation, and risks so readers could reach their own informed decision.</p>\n<p><b>Business: Why NIO Wins</b></p>\n<p>NIO positions itself in the premium SUV segment, focusing on smart EVs with a differentiated battery strategy.</p>\n<p>Delivered in March 2019, the company's first model, the ES8, is a luxury 7-seater SUV that is still the company's flagship product today. The ES8 is equipped with ADAS and AI system [NOMI] and is comparable to the BYD Song, Tesla Model X, the Audi Q7 45 e-Tron, etc.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443e2773f70c00c6faac8ca063e978a5\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"387\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>Source: Company</span></p>\n<p>Leveraging the installed base and customer goodwill due to the highly successful ES8, NIO successfully launched the ES6 and EC6.Recently, the company launched the ET7, its first sedan.</p>\n<p>Today, NIO is the top-selling brand in China's all-electric SUV market in April with a 23% market share, higher than Tesla's 17%, WM Motor and XPeng Motors'(NYSE:XPEV)7%, according to China Automotive Technology and Research Center data.</p>\n<p>One of the biggest competitive differentiators is NIO'sbattery strategy, which all but eliminates range anxiety, one of the biggest barriers to mass EV adoption. Not only could NIO cars be charged at any charging station for EVs, but the company also built hundreds of battery swapping stations in key cities in China, with plans to expanding to Europe.</p>\n<p>NIO's battery swapping strategy also gives the company the ability to offer a battery-as-a-service [BaaS] solution, which reduces the upfrontcostof purchasing an NIO vehicle by ~$11,000. Since cost is another major barrier to mass EV adoption, NIO's battery strategy appears brilliant as it solves both the range and cost problems.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5b25fbb85bffd39310cd27cbb2bde57a\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"216\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>Source: Company</span></p>\n<p>Another differentiator is the NIO brand, which management created brilliantly by introducing the EP9 in 2016. Six EP9s have been sold to NIO investors for 2.5 million pounds, creating an aura of exclusivity and quality around the brand. Next, NIO targeted the mass-market luxury SUV segment with the ES8, firmly establishing the company as a luxury car OEM.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ad41c960ce02f1e3f3e7575ac00beee0\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"350\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>Source: Company</span></p>\n<p>Chinese companies must struggle against the common perception that they make low-quality products. This is the same perception issue that Japanese companies faced following their defeat after WW2. Japan solved this problem by moving up the value chain as their economy matured and creating high-quality brands such as Sony(NYSE:SONY). Today, Japan is known for its craftsmanship.</p>\n<p>China is following the same trajectory, and NIO is one of the emerging brands destroying the perception that \"made in China\" equates to poor quality. I strongly believe that investors who stubbornly hold on to that old perception will miss out on investing in some of the greatest brands the world will ever see.</p>\n<p>Buying an NIO car means much more than just getting a vehicle; it means getting into an exclusive club of services and convenience. Benefits include access to hundreds of swapping stations, lifetime free roadside rescue (including charge vans), lifetime free cellular connectivity, lifetime free warranty, and excellent customer service. This is a powerful selling point for NIO, differentiating it from Tesla, which hasrecentlydeveloped a poor reputation on the customer service front in China.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a73482aa0431694b760ab5c2d0aa6f53\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"211\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>Source: Company</span></p>\n<p>The company is pushing the envelope even further with&nbsp;NIO House, a literal clubhouse for customers, and&nbsp;NIO Life, which includes NIO branded lifestyle products. NIO's effort to build a lifestyle around its cars seems to be&nbsp;working. This is good news for investors because the only way to escape the competitive battlefield of automobile OEM is to sell services and lifestyles to customers. This is why Ferrari's (RACE) operating margin is well over 20%, while Ford (F) and General Motors (GM) are in the single digits.</p>\n<p><b>Financials &amp; Valuation</b></p>\n<p>NIO is in hyper-growth mode. In 2020, the company generated $2.5 billion in revenue, up 126% y/y. In 2021, the company is expected to grow 117% y/y to $5.4 billion.</p>\n<p>The company is not yet profitable but is expected to be by 2022. Gross margin only turned positive in 2020 and is expected to be 19.3% in 2021. EBITDA is expected to be negative $258 million in 2021 and a positive $206 million in 2022. Free cash flow is expected to be negative $42 million in 2021 before turning to a positive $354 million in 2022.</p>\n<p>However, despite the cash burn expected in 2021, investors should feel at ease since the company exited&nbsp;2020&nbsp;with $5.9 billion of cash and cash equivalents. Including $600 million in short-term investments and subtracting ~$2.1 billion in debt and operating leases and the expected negative free cash flow in 2021, NIO should exit 2021 with over $4 billion in net cash and investments. That is plenty of buffers since NIO is expected to generate positive free cash flow in 2022.</p>\n<p>Since NIO is not yet profitable, we will look at the forward EV/Sales multiple as is typical for hyper-growth companies not yet generating a profit. The company went public in September 2018, trading at around 7 to 8 times EV/Sales, before bottoming out at around 0.7 times sales in May 2019. The market, however, caught the EV fever in April 2020 and sent NIO's valuation soaring to a peak of 14.6x by January 2021. After the growth sell-off we recently experienced, NIO is currently sitting at a much more reasonable 8 times forward sales. This is a significant discount to TSLA's 10.2 times forward EV/Sales despite growing twice as fast (TSLA is expected to grow revenues by 57% in 2021 compared to NIO's 117%).</p>\n<p><b>Risks</b></p>\n<p>There are many risks associated with owning NIO.</p>\n<p>Although its battery swapping strategy is highly differentiated and seems to be growing rapidly, the jury is still out on the ultimate market share of battery swapping or fast-charging infrastructure. If fast charging technology continues to advance significantly, it will likely erode a key advantage of battery swapping: speed.</p>\n<p>NIO's business model is innovative and new. Unfortunately, the flip side of that is that it is untested, and NIO remains unprofitable. For many investors, NIO will remain a \"show me\" story until the profitability of its business model improves.</p>\n<p>NIO's ability to expand globally may be limited by the rising geopolitical tension between China and the US, and to a lesser extent, with Japan and Europe. The geopolitical situation remains highly opaque and uncertain, and is a risk factor for all auto OEMs.</p>\n<p>Auto OEMs are currently facing a severe chip&nbsp;shortage. In addition, the chip density in automobiles is increasing, making the OEMs increasingly reliant on semiconductor suppliers and foundries.</p>\n<p>NIO's competitive advantages may not overcome the massive scale advantage of ICE OEMs and much bigger EV players like Tesla and China's BYD.</p>\n<p><b>Takeaway</b></p>\n<p>NIO's technical and business model innovations make it a highly differentiated company in the exciting and rapidly growing EV market. The company is winning, and its competitive moat is getting bigger as its ecosystem of vehicles and services grows. Relative to the industry leader, Tesla, NIO's stock price seems like a bargain given its faster growth rate and lower multiples.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>NIO Is Winning</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nNIO Is Winning\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-06-18 09:31 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4435341-nio-is-winning><strong>seekingalpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Summary\n\nNIO is #1 in China's electric SUV market for good reason.\nThe company's success is driven by its brilliant innovations and marketing strategy.\nNIO is growing faster than Tesla, and yet, it is...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4435341-nio-is-winning\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NIO":"蔚来"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4435341-nio-is-winning","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1148576248","content_text":"Summary\n\nNIO is #1 in China's electric SUV market for good reason.\nThe company's success is driven by its brilliant innovations and marketing strategy.\nNIO is growing faster than Tesla, and yet, it is trading at a discount.\n\nPonyWang/E+ via Getty Images\nNIO Inc. (NYSE:NIO) stands out for its strong market position- #1 market share in electric SUV in China- and innovation in the rapidly growing and highly competitive electric vehicle industry. This article will discuss why NIO is winning against some stiff competition, including against Tesla (TSLA).\nIn addition, we will discuss NIO's business, financials, trading, valuation, and risks so readers could reach their own informed decision.\nBusiness: Why NIO Wins\nNIO positions itself in the premium SUV segment, focusing on smart EVs with a differentiated battery strategy.\nDelivered in March 2019, the company's first model, the ES8, is a luxury 7-seater SUV that is still the company's flagship product today. The ES8 is equipped with ADAS and AI system [NOMI] and is comparable to the BYD Song, Tesla Model X, the Audi Q7 45 e-Tron, etc.\nSource: Company\nLeveraging the installed base and customer goodwill due to the highly successful ES8, NIO successfully launched the ES6 and EC6.Recently, the company launched the ET7, its first sedan.\nToday, NIO is the top-selling brand in China's all-electric SUV market in April with a 23% market share, higher than Tesla's 17%, WM Motor and XPeng Motors'(NYSE:XPEV)7%, according to China Automotive Technology and Research Center data.\nOne of the biggest competitive differentiators is NIO'sbattery strategy, which all but eliminates range anxiety, one of the biggest barriers to mass EV adoption. Not only could NIO cars be charged at any charging station for EVs, but the company also built hundreds of battery swapping stations in key cities in China, with plans to expanding to Europe.\nNIO's battery swapping strategy also gives the company the ability to offer a battery-as-a-service [BaaS] solution, which reduces the upfrontcostof purchasing an NIO vehicle by ~$11,000. Since cost is another major barrier to mass EV adoption, NIO's battery strategy appears brilliant as it solves both the range and cost problems.\nSource: Company\nAnother differentiator is the NIO brand, which management created brilliantly by introducing the EP9 in 2016. Six EP9s have been sold to NIO investors for 2.5 million pounds, creating an aura of exclusivity and quality around the brand. Next, NIO targeted the mass-market luxury SUV segment with the ES8, firmly establishing the company as a luxury car OEM.\nSource: Company\nChinese companies must struggle against the common perception that they make low-quality products. This is the same perception issue that Japanese companies faced following their defeat after WW2. Japan solved this problem by moving up the value chain as their economy matured and creating high-quality brands such as Sony(NYSE:SONY). Today, Japan is known for its craftsmanship.\nChina is following the same trajectory, and NIO is one of the emerging brands destroying the perception that \"made in China\" equates to poor quality. I strongly believe that investors who stubbornly hold on to that old perception will miss out on investing in some of the greatest brands the world will ever see.\nBuying an NIO car means much more than just getting a vehicle; it means getting into an exclusive club of services and convenience. Benefits include access to hundreds of swapping stations, lifetime free roadside rescue (including charge vans), lifetime free cellular connectivity, lifetime free warranty, and excellent customer service. This is a powerful selling point for NIO, differentiating it from Tesla, which hasrecentlydeveloped a poor reputation on the customer service front in China.\nSource: Company\nThe company is pushing the envelope even further with NIO House, a literal clubhouse for customers, and NIO Life, which includes NIO branded lifestyle products. NIO's effort to build a lifestyle around its cars seems to be working. This is good news for investors because the only way to escape the competitive battlefield of automobile OEM is to sell services and lifestyles to customers. This is why Ferrari's (RACE) operating margin is well over 20%, while Ford (F) and General Motors (GM) are in the single digits.\nFinancials & Valuation\nNIO is in hyper-growth mode. In 2020, the company generated $2.5 billion in revenue, up 126% y/y. In 2021, the company is expected to grow 117% y/y to $5.4 billion.\nThe company is not yet profitable but is expected to be by 2022. Gross margin only turned positive in 2020 and is expected to be 19.3% in 2021. EBITDA is expected to be negative $258 million in 2021 and a positive $206 million in 2022. Free cash flow is expected to be negative $42 million in 2021 before turning to a positive $354 million in 2022.\nHowever, despite the cash burn expected in 2021, investors should feel at ease since the company exited 2020 with $5.9 billion of cash and cash equivalents. Including $600 million in short-term investments and subtracting ~$2.1 billion in debt and operating leases and the expected negative free cash flow in 2021, NIO should exit 2021 with over $4 billion in net cash and investments. That is plenty of buffers since NIO is expected to generate positive free cash flow in 2022.\nSince NIO is not yet profitable, we will look at the forward EV/Sales multiple as is typical for hyper-growth companies not yet generating a profit. The company went public in September 2018, trading at around 7 to 8 times EV/Sales, before bottoming out at around 0.7 times sales in May 2019. The market, however, caught the EV fever in April 2020 and sent NIO's valuation soaring to a peak of 14.6x by January 2021. After the growth sell-off we recently experienced, NIO is currently sitting at a much more reasonable 8 times forward sales. This is a significant discount to TSLA's 10.2 times forward EV/Sales despite growing twice as fast (TSLA is expected to grow revenues by 57% in 2021 compared to NIO's 117%).\nRisks\nThere are many risks associated with owning NIO.\nAlthough its battery swapping strategy is highly differentiated and seems to be growing rapidly, the jury is still out on the ultimate market share of battery swapping or fast-charging infrastructure. If fast charging technology continues to advance significantly, it will likely erode a key advantage of battery swapping: speed.\nNIO's business model is innovative and new. Unfortunately, the flip side of that is that it is untested, and NIO remains unprofitable. For many investors, NIO will remain a \"show me\" story until the profitability of its business model improves.\nNIO's ability to expand globally may be limited by the rising geopolitical tension between China and the US, and to a lesser extent, with Japan and Europe. The geopolitical situation remains highly opaque and uncertain, and is a risk factor for all auto OEMs.\nAuto OEMs are currently facing a severe chip shortage. In addition, the chip density in automobiles is increasing, making the OEMs increasingly reliant on semiconductor suppliers and foundries.\nNIO's competitive advantages may not overcome the massive scale advantage of ICE OEMs and much bigger EV players like Tesla and China's BYD.\nTakeaway\nNIO's technical and business model innovations make it a highly differentiated company in the exciting and rapidly growing EV market. The company is winning, and its competitive moat is getting bigger as its ecosystem of vehicles and services grows. Relative to the industry leader, Tesla, NIO's stock price seems like a bargain given its faster growth rate and lower multiples.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":326,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":353391803,"gmtCreate":1616459568402,"gmtModify":1704794323152,"author":{"id":"3562919640401993","authorId":"3562919640401993","name":"Jiangbox","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7379f7108480b709cc9a6a874592f0ae","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3562919640401993","authorIdStr":"3562919640401993"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Missed the boat.","listText":"Missed the boat.","text":"Missed the boat.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/353391803","repostId":"2121363172","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":123,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9008671307,"gmtCreate":1641439247403,"gmtModify":1676533615861,"author":{"id":"3562919640401993","authorId":"3562919640401993","name":"Jiangbox","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7379f7108480b709cc9a6a874592f0ae","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3562919640401993","authorIdStr":"3562919640401993"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Die, all red.","listText":"Die, all red.","text":"Die, all red.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9008671307","repostId":"2201255535","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2201255535","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1641423313,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2201255535?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-01-06 06:55","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Nasdaq posts biggest daily drop since Feb after 'hawkish' Fed minutes","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2201255535","media":"Reuters","summary":"* S&P 500 posts biggest daily pct fall since Nov. 26* Fed minutes show officials said labor market \"very tight\"* Indexes: Dow down 1.1%, S&P 500 down 1.9%, Nasdaq down 3.3%NEW YORK, Jan 5 (Reuters) - ","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>* S&amp;P 500 posts biggest daily pct fall since Nov. 26</p><p>* Fed minutes show officials said labor market &#34;very tight&#34;</p><p>* Indexes: Dow down 1.1%, S&amp;P 500 down 1.9%, Nasdaq down 3.3%</p><p>NEW YORK, Jan 5 (Reuters) - U.S. stocks fell sharply on Wednesday, with the Nasdaq plunging more than 3% in its biggest one-day percentage drop since February, after U.S. Federal Reserve meeting minutes signaled the central bank may raise interest rates sooner than expected.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 fell more than 1%, its biggest daily percentage decline since Nov. 26, the first day of trading after news of the Omicron variant of the coronavirus.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 and Nasdaq quickly extended their declines after the release of the minutes, which investors viewed as more hawkish than they had feared. The Dow, which hit a record high earlier in the day, reversed course and ended down more than 1%.</p><p>The selloff was broad, with all S&amp;P sectors ending in the red, and Wall Street&#39;s fear gauge, the Cboe Volatility index, closing at its highest level since Dec. 21.</p><p>In the minutes from the Fed&#39;s Dec. 14-15 policy meeting, central bank policymakers said a &#34;very tight&#34; job market and unabated inflation might require the Fed to raise rates sooner and begin reducing its overall asset holdings as a second brake on the economy.</p><p>&#34;Indications that the Fed is very concerned about inflation could quickly create a view that the Fed will aggressively tighten in 2022,&#34; said David Carter, chief investment officer at Lenox Wealth Advisors in New York, calling the minutes &#34;more hawkish than expected.&#34;</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 technology sector fell 3.1% and was the biggest drag on the benchmark index, while the rate-sensitive real estate sector dropped 3.2% in its biggest daily percentage decline since Jan. 4, 2021.</p><p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 392.54 points, or 1.07%, to 36,407.11, the S&amp;P 500 lost 92.96 points, or 1.94%, to 4,700.58 and the Nasdaq Composite dropped 522.54 points, or 3.34%, to 15,100.17.</p><p>Rising interest rates increase borrowing costs for businesses and consumers, and higher rates can depress stock multiples, especially for technology and other growth stocks.</p><p>Growth shares have been under pressure from a recent rise in U.S. Treasury yields.</p><p>The Russell 2000 index also suffered its biggest one-day drop since Nov. 26, while the S&amp;P 500 financials index fell 1.3%, a day after it registered an all-time closing high.</p><p>Policymakers in December agreed to hasten the end of their pandemic-era program of bond purchases, and issued forecasts anticipating three quarter-percentage-point rate increases during 2022. The Fed&#39;s benchmark overnight interest rate is currently set near zero.</p><p>Early in the day, an ADP National Employment report showed private payrolls increased by 807,000 jobs last month, more than double of what economists polled by Reuters had forecast.</p><p>The report comes ahead of the Labor Department&#39;s more comprehensive and closely watched nonfarm payrolls data for December on Friday.</p><p>Declining issues outnumbered advancing ones on the NYSE by a 4.32-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 4.22-to-1 ratio favored decliners.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 posted 59 new 52-week highs and 1 new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 81 new highs and 307 new lows.</p><p>Volume on U.S. exchanges was 12.18 billion shares, compared with the 10.4 billion average for the full session over the last 20 trading days.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Nasdaq posts biggest daily drop since Feb after 'hawkish' Fed minutes</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nNasdaq posts biggest daily drop since Feb after 'hawkish' Fed minutes\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-01-06 06:55</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>* S&amp;P 500 posts biggest daily pct fall since Nov. 26</p><p>* Fed minutes show officials said labor market &#34;very tight&#34;</p><p>* Indexes: Dow down 1.1%, S&amp;P 500 down 1.9%, Nasdaq down 3.3%</p><p>NEW YORK, Jan 5 (Reuters) - U.S. stocks fell sharply on Wednesday, with the Nasdaq plunging more than 3% in its biggest one-day percentage drop since February, after U.S. Federal Reserve meeting minutes signaled the central bank may raise interest rates sooner than expected.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 fell more than 1%, its biggest daily percentage decline since Nov. 26, the first day of trading after news of the Omicron variant of the coronavirus.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 and Nasdaq quickly extended their declines after the release of the minutes, which investors viewed as more hawkish than they had feared. The Dow, which hit a record high earlier in the day, reversed course and ended down more than 1%.</p><p>The selloff was broad, with all S&amp;P sectors ending in the red, and Wall Street&#39;s fear gauge, the Cboe Volatility index, closing at its highest level since Dec. 21.</p><p>In the minutes from the Fed&#39;s Dec. 14-15 policy meeting, central bank policymakers said a &#34;very tight&#34; job market and unabated inflation might require the Fed to raise rates sooner and begin reducing its overall asset holdings as a second brake on the economy.</p><p>&#34;Indications that the Fed is very concerned about inflation could quickly create a view that the Fed will aggressively tighten in 2022,&#34; said David Carter, chief investment officer at Lenox Wealth Advisors in New York, calling the minutes &#34;more hawkish than expected.&#34;</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 technology sector fell 3.1% and was the biggest drag on the benchmark index, while the rate-sensitive real estate sector dropped 3.2% in its biggest daily percentage decline since Jan. 4, 2021.</p><p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 392.54 points, or 1.07%, to 36,407.11, the S&amp;P 500 lost 92.96 points, or 1.94%, to 4,700.58 and the Nasdaq Composite dropped 522.54 points, or 3.34%, to 15,100.17.</p><p>Rising interest rates increase borrowing costs for businesses and consumers, and higher rates can depress stock multiples, especially for technology and other growth stocks.</p><p>Growth shares have been under pressure from a recent rise in U.S. Treasury yields.</p><p>The Russell 2000 index also suffered its biggest one-day drop since Nov. 26, while the S&amp;P 500 financials index fell 1.3%, a day after it registered an all-time closing high.</p><p>Policymakers in December agreed to hasten the end of their pandemic-era program of bond purchases, and issued forecasts anticipating three quarter-percentage-point rate increases during 2022. The Fed&#39;s benchmark overnight interest rate is currently set near zero.</p><p>Early in the day, an ADP National Employment report showed private payrolls increased by 807,000 jobs last month, more than double of what economists polled by Reuters had forecast.</p><p>The report comes ahead of the Labor Department&#39;s more comprehensive and closely watched nonfarm payrolls data for December on Friday.</p><p>Declining issues outnumbered advancing ones on the NYSE by a 4.32-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 4.22-to-1 ratio favored decliners.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 posted 59 new 52-week highs and 1 new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 81 new highs and 307 new lows.</p><p>Volume on U.S. exchanges was 12.18 billion shares, compared with the 10.4 billion average for the full session over the last 20 trading days.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SPY":"标普500ETF","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","BK4559":"巴菲特持仓",".DJI":"道琼斯","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite","BK4504":"桥水持仓",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2201255535","content_text":"* S&P 500 posts biggest daily pct fall since Nov. 26* Fed minutes show officials said labor market \"very tight\"* Indexes: Dow down 1.1%, S&P 500 down 1.9%, Nasdaq down 3.3%NEW YORK, Jan 5 (Reuters) - U.S. stocks fell sharply on Wednesday, with the Nasdaq plunging more than 3% in its biggest one-day percentage drop since February, after U.S. Federal Reserve meeting minutes signaled the central bank may raise interest rates sooner than expected.The S&P 500 fell more than 1%, its biggest daily percentage decline since Nov. 26, the first day of trading after news of the Omicron variant of the coronavirus.The S&P 500 and Nasdaq quickly extended their declines after the release of the minutes, which investors viewed as more hawkish than they had feared. The Dow, which hit a record high earlier in the day, reversed course and ended down more than 1%.The selloff was broad, with all S&P sectors ending in the red, and Wall Street's fear gauge, the Cboe Volatility index, closing at its highest level since Dec. 21.In the minutes from the Fed's Dec. 14-15 policy meeting, central bank policymakers said a \"very tight\" job market and unabated inflation might require the Fed to raise rates sooner and begin reducing its overall asset holdings as a second brake on the economy.\"Indications that the Fed is very concerned about inflation could quickly create a view that the Fed will aggressively tighten in 2022,\" said David Carter, chief investment officer at Lenox Wealth Advisors in New York, calling the minutes \"more hawkish than expected.\"The S&P 500 technology sector fell 3.1% and was the biggest drag on the benchmark index, while the rate-sensitive real estate sector dropped 3.2% in its biggest daily percentage decline since Jan. 4, 2021.The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 392.54 points, or 1.07%, to 36,407.11, the S&P 500 lost 92.96 points, or 1.94%, to 4,700.58 and the Nasdaq Composite dropped 522.54 points, or 3.34%, to 15,100.17.Rising interest rates increase borrowing costs for businesses and consumers, and higher rates can depress stock multiples, especially for technology and other growth stocks.Growth shares have been under pressure from a recent rise in U.S. Treasury yields.The Russell 2000 index also suffered its biggest one-day drop since Nov. 26, while the S&P 500 financials index fell 1.3%, a day after it registered an all-time closing high.Policymakers in December agreed to hasten the end of their pandemic-era program of bond purchases, and issued forecasts anticipating three quarter-percentage-point rate increases during 2022. The Fed's benchmark overnight interest rate is currently set near zero.Early in the day, an ADP National Employment report showed private payrolls increased by 807,000 jobs last month, more than double of what economists polled by Reuters had forecast.The report comes ahead of the Labor Department's more comprehensive and closely watched nonfarm payrolls data for December on Friday.Declining issues outnumbered advancing ones on the NYSE by a 4.32-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 4.22-to-1 ratio favored decliners.The S&P 500 posted 59 new 52-week highs and 1 new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 81 new highs and 307 new lows.Volume on U.S. exchanges was 12.18 billion shares, compared with the 10.4 billion average for the full session over the last 20 trading days.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":744,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":165774423,"gmtCreate":1624159671162,"gmtModify":1703829789540,"author":{"id":"3562919640401993","authorId":"3562919640401993","name":"Jiangbox","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7379f7108480b709cc9a6a874592f0ae","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3562919640401993","authorIdStr":"3562919640401993"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"AMC still got room to shoot up, target 80-90.","listText":"AMC still got room to shoot up, target 80-90.","text":"AMC still got room to shoot up, target 80-90.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/165774423","repostId":"1166679093","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1166679093","pubTimestamp":1624065234,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1166679093?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-19 09:13","market":"us","language":"en","title":"3 Meme Stocks Wall Street Predicts Will Plunge More Than 20%","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1166679093","media":"fool","summary":"Meme stocks have been all the rage so far this year. That's understandable, with several of them del","content":"<p>Meme stocks have been all the rage so far this year. That's understandable, with several of them delivering triple-digit and even four-digit percentage gains.</p>\n<p>However, what goes up can come down. Analysts don't expect the online frenzy fueling the ginormous jumps for some of the most popular stocks will be sustainable. Here are three meme stocks that Wall Street thinks will plunge by more than 20% within the next 12 months.</p>\n<p>AMC Entertainment</p>\n<p><b>AMC Entertainment</b>(NYSE:AMC)ranks as the best-performing meme stock of all. Shares of the movie theater operator have skyrocketed close to 2,500% year to date.</p>\n<p>The consensus among analysts, though, is that the stock could lose 90% of its current value. Even the most optimistic analyst surveyed by Refinitiv has a price target for AMC that's more than 70% below the current share price.</p>\n<p>But isn't AMC's business picking up? Yep. The easing of restrictions has enabled the company to reopen 99% of its U.S. theaters. AMC could benefit as seating capacity limitations imposed by state and local governments are raised. Thereleases of multiple movies this summerand later this year that are likely to be hits should also help.</p>\n<p>However, Wall Street clearly believes that AMC's share price has gotten way ahead of its business prospects. The stock is trading at nearly eight times higher than it was before the COVID-19 pandemic.</p>\n<p>Clover Health Investments</p>\n<p>Only a few days ago, it looked like&nbsp;<b>Clover Health Investments</b>(NASDAQ:CLOV)might push AMC to the side as the hottest meme stock. Retail investors viewed Clover as a primeshort squeezecandidate.</p>\n<p>Since the beginning of June, shares of Clover Health have jumped more than 65%. Analysts, however, don't expect those gains to last. The average price target for the stock is 25% below the current share price.</p>\n<p>Clover Health's valuation does seem to have gotten out of hand. The healthcare stock currently trades at more than 170 times trailing-12-month sales. That's a nosebleed level, especially considering that the company is the subject of investigations by the U.S. Department of Justice and the Securities and Exchange Commission.</p>\n<p>Still, Clover Health could deliver improving financial results this year. The company hopes to significantly increase its membership by targeting the original Medicare program. This represents a major new market opportunity in addition to its current Medicare Advantage business.</p>\n<p>Sundial Growers</p>\n<p>At one point earlier this year,&nbsp;<b>Sundial Growers</b>(NASDAQ:SNDL)appeared to be a legitimate contender to become the biggest winner among meme stocks. The Canadian marijuana stock vaulted more than 520% higher year to date before giving up much of its gains. However, Sundial's share price has still more than doubled in 2021.</p>\n<p>Analysts anticipate that the pot stock could fall even further. The consensus price target for Sundial reflects a 23% discount to its current share price. One analyst even thinks the stock could sink 55%.</p>\n<p>There certainly are reasons to be pessimistic about Sundial's core cannabis business. The company's net cannabis revenue fell year over year in the first quarter of 2021. Although Sundial is taking steps that it hopes will turn things around, it remains to be seen if those efforts will succeed.</p>\n<p>Sundial's business deals could give investors reasons for optimism. After all, the company posted positive adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) in Q1 due to its investments.</p>\n<p>However, the cash that Sundial is using to make these investments has come at the cost of increased dilution of its stock. The company can't afford any additional dilution without having to resort to desperate measures to keep its listing on the&nbsp;<b>Nasdaq</b>&nbsp;stock exchange.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>3 Meme Stocks Wall Street Predicts Will Plunge More Than 20%</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n3 Meme Stocks Wall Street Predicts Will Plunge More Than 20%\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-06-19 09:13 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/06/18/3-meme-stocks-wall-street-predicts-will-plunge-mor/><strong>fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Meme stocks have been all the rage so far this year. That's understandable, with several of them delivering triple-digit and even four-digit percentage gains.\nHowever, what goes up can come down. ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/06/18/3-meme-stocks-wall-street-predicts-will-plunge-mor/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AMC":"AMC院线","SNDL":"SNDL Inc.","CLOV":"Clover Health Corp"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/06/18/3-meme-stocks-wall-street-predicts-will-plunge-mor/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1166679093","content_text":"Meme stocks have been all the rage so far this year. That's understandable, with several of them delivering triple-digit and even four-digit percentage gains.\nHowever, what goes up can come down. Analysts don't expect the online frenzy fueling the ginormous jumps for some of the most popular stocks will be sustainable. Here are three meme stocks that Wall Street thinks will plunge by more than 20% within the next 12 months.\nAMC Entertainment\nAMC Entertainment(NYSE:AMC)ranks as the best-performing meme stock of all. Shares of the movie theater operator have skyrocketed close to 2,500% year to date.\nThe consensus among analysts, though, is that the stock could lose 90% of its current value. Even the most optimistic analyst surveyed by Refinitiv has a price target for AMC that's more than 70% below the current share price.\nBut isn't AMC's business picking up? Yep. The easing of restrictions has enabled the company to reopen 99% of its U.S. theaters. AMC could benefit as seating capacity limitations imposed by state and local governments are raised. Thereleases of multiple movies this summerand later this year that are likely to be hits should also help.\nHowever, Wall Street clearly believes that AMC's share price has gotten way ahead of its business prospects. The stock is trading at nearly eight times higher than it was before the COVID-19 pandemic.\nClover Health Investments\nOnly a few days ago, it looked like Clover Health Investments(NASDAQ:CLOV)might push AMC to the side as the hottest meme stock. Retail investors viewed Clover as a primeshort squeezecandidate.\nSince the beginning of June, shares of Clover Health have jumped more than 65%. Analysts, however, don't expect those gains to last. The average price target for the stock is 25% below the current share price.\nClover Health's valuation does seem to have gotten out of hand. The healthcare stock currently trades at more than 170 times trailing-12-month sales. That's a nosebleed level, especially considering that the company is the subject of investigations by the U.S. Department of Justice and the Securities and Exchange Commission.\nStill, Clover Health could deliver improving financial results this year. The company hopes to significantly increase its membership by targeting the original Medicare program. This represents a major new market opportunity in addition to its current Medicare Advantage business.\nSundial Growers\nAt one point earlier this year, Sundial Growers(NASDAQ:SNDL)appeared to be a legitimate contender to become the biggest winner among meme stocks. The Canadian marijuana stock vaulted more than 520% higher year to date before giving up much of its gains. However, Sundial's share price has still more than doubled in 2021.\nAnalysts anticipate that the pot stock could fall even further. The consensus price target for Sundial reflects a 23% discount to its current share price. One analyst even thinks the stock could sink 55%.\nThere certainly are reasons to be pessimistic about Sundial's core cannabis business. The company's net cannabis revenue fell year over year in the first quarter of 2021. Although Sundial is taking steps that it hopes will turn things around, it remains to be seen if those efforts will succeed.\nSundial's business deals could give investors reasons for optimism. After all, the company posted positive adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) in Q1 due to its investments.\nHowever, the cash that Sundial is using to make these investments has come at the cost of increased dilution of its stock. The company can't afford any additional dilution without having to resort to desperate measures to keep its listing on the Nasdaq stock exchange.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":556,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":347760938,"gmtCreate":1618531415424,"gmtModify":1704712229420,"author":{"id":"3562919640401993","authorId":"3562919640401993","name":"Jiangbox","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7379f7108480b709cc9a6a874592f0ae","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3562919640401993","authorIdStr":"3562919640401993"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"No 150 no sell.","listText":"No 150 no sell.","text":"No 150 no sell.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/347760938","repostId":"1194448258","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1194448258","pubTimestamp":1618530514,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1194448258?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-04-16 07:48","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple won’t make an iPhone Mini next year, says top analyst","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1194448258","media":"CNBC","summary":"KEY POINTS\n\nApple’s 2022 iPhones could come in four different models with significantly improved cam","content":"<div>\n<p>KEY POINTS\n\nApple’s 2022 iPhones could come in four different models with significantly improved cameras, TFI analyst Ming-Chi Kuo said in a Wednesday note to investors.\nThe devices could come in two ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/04/15/apple-could-stop-making-new-iphone-mini-models-by-2022-top-analyst-says-.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"cnbc_highlight","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple won’t make an iPhone Mini next year, says top analyst</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple won’t make an iPhone Mini next year, says top analyst\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-04-16 07:48 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.cnbc.com/2021/04/15/apple-could-stop-making-new-iphone-mini-models-by-2022-top-analyst-says-.html><strong>CNBC</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>KEY POINTS\n\nApple’s 2022 iPhones could come in four different models with significantly improved cameras, TFI analyst Ming-Chi Kuo said in a Wednesday note to investors.\nThe devices could come in two ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/04/15/apple-could-stop-making-new-iphone-mini-models-by-2022-top-analyst-says-.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/04/15/apple-could-stop-making-new-iphone-mini-models-by-2022-top-analyst-says-.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/72bb72e1b84c09fca865c6dcb1bbcd16","article_id":"1194448258","content_text":"KEY POINTS\n\nApple’s 2022 iPhones could come in four different models with significantly improved cameras, TFI analyst Ming-Chi Kuo said in a Wednesday note to investors.\nThe devices could come in two sizes, a 6.7-inch phone and a 6.1-inch phone. Both sizes could come in high-end and low-end versions, according to the note.\nIf accurate, Kuo’s prediction would suggest that Apple is backing away from its lowest-cost new device, the iPhone 12 Mini, which was released in 2020 after years of user requests for a smaller iPhone.\n\nApple’s 2022 iPhones could come in four different models with significantly improved cameras, TFI analyst Ming-Chi Kuo said in a Wednesday note to investors.\nThe devices could come in two sizes, a 6.7-inch phone and a 6.1-inch phone. Both sizes could come in high-end and low-end versions, according to the note.\nIf accurate, Kuo’s prediction would suggest that Apple is backing away from its lowest-cost new device, the iPhone 12 Mini, which was released in 2020 after years of user requests for a smaller iPhone.\nHowever, reports from Apple’s Asian supply chain and analyst estimates suggest that the iPhone 12 Mini is not selling well compared with other iPhones with larger displays and bigger batteries.\nKuo’s research focuses on companies in Apple’s Asian supply chain, and he’s well known for making accurate predictions about upcoming Apple products.\nIn the Wednesday note, he said that the 2022 iPhones will feature camera upgrades using expensive parts to increase resolution and image quality and will make video shot on iPhones more appropriate for a forthcoming high-resolution augmented reality and virtual reality headset.\nHe writes the 2022 iPhones will include a new image sensor supplied by Sony that can output video at 8k resolution and take 48-megapixel photos. They’ll also use improved camera lenses.\n“We believe that the camera quality of the new 2H22 iPhone will elevate mobile phone camera photography to a new level,” Kuo wrote.\nLooking beyond 2022, Kuo writes that he expects Apple to release iPhones in 2023 with a “periscope” telephoto lens for longer zoom and to include the FaceID facial recognition camera underneath the phone’s display, which would suggest that the “notch” in the screen on the current iPhones could shrink or be removed.\nHe also expects Apple to release a headset computer for augmented reality and virtual reality applications with 15 cameras, although he didn’t specify a time frame.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":108,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9008338401,"gmtCreate":1641356486105,"gmtModify":1676533605550,"author":{"id":"3562919640401993","authorId":"3562919640401993","name":"Jiangbox","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7379f7108480b709cc9a6a874592f0ae","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3562919640401993","authorIdStr":"3562919640401993"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Amd","listText":"Amd","text":"Amd","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9008338401","repostId":"1194155159","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1194155159","pubTimestamp":1641352023,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1194155159?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-01-05 11:07","market":"us","language":"en","title":"AMD Vs. Intel Stock: Which Is The Better Buy For 2025?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1194155159","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"SummaryIntel will likely spend more than $100 billion in building new fabs in the next 5 years.Meanw","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>Summary</b></p><ul><li>Intel will likely spend more than $100 billion in building new fabs in the next 5 years.</li><li>Meanwhile, AMD continues to sub-contract its chip production to others.</li><li>Intel&#39;s IP (Intellectual Property) should give it an advantage in the chip-making market.</li><li>The ARMy is coming for both Intel and AMD.</li></ul><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a089082342ac5b46ade603677d86114d\" tg-width=\"1536\" tg-height=\"1024\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>sefa ozel/E+ via Getty Images</span></p><p>Intel(NASDAQ:INTC) and AMD(NASDAQ:AMD) have been competitors for more than 50 years. Both were founded by former Fairchild Semiconductor International engineers, Intel in 1968 by Gordon Moore, and AMD in 1969 by Jerry Sanders.</p><p>Fast forward to the 21st century and Intel dominated for the first 15 years, but AMD has made huge progress in the last five years and is now considered by many to be the superior technical innovator of X86 CPUs.</p><p>But as we look forward to the next five years, who will dominate? I would argue that the future will be much different than the past with the competitive situation between the two still prominent but the overall businesses themselves will diverge significantly by 2025.</p><p>I have written over 50 articles on the two companies and have been especially praiseworthy of AMD and its uber-CEO, Lisa Su. But over the next five years and beyond, I see less direct technical competition as Intel massively diversifies into the chip manufacturing business as well as maintaining its traditional CPU market.</p><p>In 2018 I wrote this about AMD and the management skills shown by its new CEO Lisa Su &#34;AMD: 5 Reasons The Shorts Will Be Changing Their Shorts Shortly&#34; while critiquing Intel in this article &#34;Intel: There Are No Tails Big Enough To Wag This Dog&#34;.</p><p>Here are four points to consider when deciding whether to invest in AMD or Intel.</p><p><b>1. Intel will likely spend more than $100 billion in building new fabs in the next five years.</b></p><p>Intel is known for its large CAPEX spending ($65 billion over the last five years) but as it moves deliberately into the chip manufacturing business, that number will become much larger.</p><p>The chip shortage has made many countries realize they cannot depend upon overseas sources, to make their chips anymore. And to make sure it doesn&#39;t happen again they are handing out billions to companies like Intel to make fabs in their country so that their manufacturers can have enough chips to keep their factories (and employees) working around the clock.</p><p>In the US the bi-partisan CHIPS Act has already passed the Senate allocating a total of $52 billion to new chip facilities built in the US(see here). I would think Intel would get a good share of that $52 billion.</p><p>Also on the docket is the FABS act which would grant 25% tax credits to companies building new fabs in the US.</p><p>And Italy and Intel are talking about a $9 billion plant investment.</p><ul><li>The talks between Intel and the Italian government over the U.S. chip giant building an advanced semiconductor packaging plant are &#34;intensifying,&#34; with a total package said to be worth more than 8 billion euros, or $9 billion,Reuters reported.</li></ul><p>In the meantime, Intel has announced it is spending $20 billion on two fabs in Arizona with the possibility of another $95 billion worth in Europe which Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger called &#34;big honkin’ fab&#34;. Big indeed.</p><p>All this leads one to think that in the near future Intel&#39;s business will be much less dependent on X86 proprietary chips and more as perhaps the most prominent semiconductor manufacturer in the world.</p><p>Why can Intel afford to invest so much in production? Since 2011, Intel&#39;s huge cash flow dwarfs AMD&#39;s by over $90 billion and that&#39;s after spending over $115 billion on CAPEX over the same time period.</p><p>This means at this point in their existence they are two very different companies with very different futures.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/aadddacb5a9fe2a359b2778b2cdedb84\" tg-width=\"267\" tg-height=\"315\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ebd02e5ce75709f7581621c8de162cd3\" tg-width=\"267\" tg-height=\"284\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p><b>2. Meanwhile, AMD continues to sub-contract its chip production to others.</b></p><p>AMD stopped making its own chips in 2008 when it sold its foundries to Global Foundries. Since then it has used both Global Foundries and Taiwan Semiconductor(NYSE:TSM). So basically, AMD has become a chip designer with production done by others. It has proven its adeptness at design by gaining market share in the X86 market vis a vis Intel.</p><p>However, that comparison can be somewhat deceiving since Intel&#39;s revenue has increased each year of the chart though AMD&#39;s revenue has grown much faster. Currently, Intel&#39;s revenue is still 5X AMD&#39;s.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e403a09a0c2853b8d2ca39ab0a1f2eca\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"498\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>Typically, one of the negatives of not making your own chips is lower margins as can be seen with this Intel/AMD margin comparison.</p><p>Although AMD is catching up, Intel still has a substantial margin advantage.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/58af9e78897a6086f70a4652e9a8cfc8\" tg-width=\"314\" tg-height=\"289\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p><b>3. Intel&#39;s IP (Intellectual Property) should give it an advantage in the chip-making market.</b></p><p>Intel has more than 60,000 patents total including thefifthmost in the world in 2020.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/035b675ed3bc1731244b14882ced742d\" tg-width=\"455\" tg-height=\"411\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>In fact, just in December 2021, Intel filed more than 170 patents with most of them having to do with process technology.</p><p>By offering to combine their proprietary technology with their customer&#39;s technology, Intel can offer better results for the same price.</p><p><b>4. The ARMy is coming for both Intel and AMD.</b></p><p>Many companies including Apple &#34;Apple May Build 40-Core ARM-Based Mac Pro, Plans 10-Core MacBook Pro&#34;, Google&#34; Google is designing its own Arm-based processors for 2023 Chromebooks&#34;, and Amazon&#34;Category: Graviton&#34;are going with ARM chips for their proprietary chip needs.</p><p>The advantage Intel has in the case of customers going to ARM is to fabricate those ARM chips in their fabs using their proprietary technology to make a superior product. With the huge number of fabs Intel is building they will also be able to provide better delivery times and volumes too.</p><p>AMD, on the other hand, will have to make their X86 even more superior than it is now and that will be no easy trick. They don&#39;t make their own chips so they can&#39;t possibly manufacture any chips for others.</p><p>AMD&#39;s customer base is very concentrated with the top five customers, including HP, Microsoft, and Sony, representing 54% of overall revenue and 70% of graphics revenue. It would be hard to imagine that those customers are not considering ARM for at least some of their chip requirements.</p><p><b>Conclusion: Is Intel or AMD Stock the Better Buy?</b></p><p>As the 50-year competition between Intel and AMD moves forward, big changes will be coming for both companies, but especially Intel.</p><p>Intel will become one of the biggest fabricators in the world while AMD continues its innovation success under Lisa Su. Intel is also moving on to other technology revenue sources such as autos with Mobileye and a new ARM competitor SiFive. SiFive has developed a RISC (Reduced Instruction Set Computer) that could replace ARM in phones as well as other devices.</p><p>Here&#39;s SiFive&#39;s CEO Patrick Little:</p><blockquote>&#34;By 2023, you&#39;re likely to see the first mobile phone with RISC-V,&#34; SiFive Chief Executive Patrick Little said in an October interview. &#34;I think we have an excellent shot at the phone.&#34;</blockquote><p>Source: MSN</p><p>If that does come true, the chips for both Mobileye and SiFive will be manufactured on one of Intel&#39;s fabs using both SiFive&#39;s and Intel&#39;s proprietary technology to take on ARM head to head.</p><p>Decades ago it looked like AMD founder Jerry Sanders was channeling the future, Lisa Su:</p><blockquote>&#34;We’re winning the fight, but they are a very formidable competitor. Intel has managed to put everybody else out of the business except us. So it&#39;s a two-man game right now. We&#39;re the challenger, they&#39;re the champion. But I think we&#39;ve got a great chance here to continue to gain market share.&#34;</blockquote><p>Exactly right I would say.</p><p>With a forward PE of 10 and a growing 3% dividend, Intel is a low-risk option on the rapidly accelerating chip-future of the world regardless of the task at hand. AMD, with a PE of 55, is certainly riskier but has proven itself to be more than competitive over the last five years. Never count Lisa Su and AMD out.</p><p>In my opinion, Intel is the better choice for the next five years because of its unique ability to expand fabs worldwide and its rather mundane expectations, and very modest PE ratio.</p><p>Intel is a buy if you have a five-year plan.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>AMD Vs. Intel Stock: Which Is The Better Buy For 2025?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAMD Vs. Intel Stock: Which Is The Better Buy For 2025?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-01-05 11:07 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4477879-amd-vs-intel-stock-better-buy-2025><strong>Seeking Alpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>SummaryIntel will likely spend more than $100 billion in building new fabs in the next 5 years.Meanwhile, AMD continues to sub-contract its chip production to others.Intel's IP (Intellectual Property)...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4477879-amd-vs-intel-stock-better-buy-2025\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"INTC":"英特尔","AMD":"美国超微公司"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4477879-amd-vs-intel-stock-better-buy-2025","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1194155159","content_text":"SummaryIntel will likely spend more than $100 billion in building new fabs in the next 5 years.Meanwhile, AMD continues to sub-contract its chip production to others.Intel's IP (Intellectual Property) should give it an advantage in the chip-making market.The ARMy is coming for both Intel and AMD.sefa ozel/E+ via Getty ImagesIntel(NASDAQ:INTC) and AMD(NASDAQ:AMD) have been competitors for more than 50 years. Both were founded by former Fairchild Semiconductor International engineers, Intel in 1968 by Gordon Moore, and AMD in 1969 by Jerry Sanders.Fast forward to the 21st century and Intel dominated for the first 15 years, but AMD has made huge progress in the last five years and is now considered by many to be the superior technical innovator of X86 CPUs.But as we look forward to the next five years, who will dominate? I would argue that the future will be much different than the past with the competitive situation between the two still prominent but the overall businesses themselves will diverge significantly by 2025.I have written over 50 articles on the two companies and have been especially praiseworthy of AMD and its uber-CEO, Lisa Su. But over the next five years and beyond, I see less direct technical competition as Intel massively diversifies into the chip manufacturing business as well as maintaining its traditional CPU market.In 2018 I wrote this about AMD and the management skills shown by its new CEO Lisa Su \"AMD: 5 Reasons The Shorts Will Be Changing Their Shorts Shortly\" while critiquing Intel in this article \"Intel: There Are No Tails Big Enough To Wag This Dog\".Here are four points to consider when deciding whether to invest in AMD or Intel.1. Intel will likely spend more than $100 billion in building new fabs in the next five years.Intel is known for its large CAPEX spending ($65 billion over the last five years) but as it moves deliberately into the chip manufacturing business, that number will become much larger.The chip shortage has made many countries realize they cannot depend upon overseas sources, to make their chips anymore. And to make sure it doesn't happen again they are handing out billions to companies like Intel to make fabs in their country so that their manufacturers can have enough chips to keep their factories (and employees) working around the clock.In the US the bi-partisan CHIPS Act has already passed the Senate allocating a total of $52 billion to new chip facilities built in the US(see here). I would think Intel would get a good share of that $52 billion.Also on the docket is the FABS act which would grant 25% tax credits to companies building new fabs in the US.And Italy and Intel are talking about a $9 billion plant investment.The talks between Intel and the Italian government over the U.S. chip giant building an advanced semiconductor packaging plant are \"intensifying,\" with a total package said to be worth more than 8 billion euros, or $9 billion,Reuters reported.In the meantime, Intel has announced it is spending $20 billion on two fabs in Arizona with the possibility of another $95 billion worth in Europe which Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger called \"big honkin’ fab\". Big indeed.All this leads one to think that in the near future Intel's business will be much less dependent on X86 proprietary chips and more as perhaps the most prominent semiconductor manufacturer in the world.Why can Intel afford to invest so much in production? Since 2011, Intel's huge cash flow dwarfs AMD's by over $90 billion and that's after spending over $115 billion on CAPEX over the same time period.This means at this point in their existence they are two very different companies with very different futures.2. Meanwhile, AMD continues to sub-contract its chip production to others.AMD stopped making its own chips in 2008 when it sold its foundries to Global Foundries. Since then it has used both Global Foundries and Taiwan Semiconductor(NYSE:TSM). So basically, AMD has become a chip designer with production done by others. It has proven its adeptness at design by gaining market share in the X86 market vis a vis Intel.However, that comparison can be somewhat deceiving since Intel's revenue has increased each year of the chart though AMD's revenue has grown much faster. Currently, Intel's revenue is still 5X AMD's.Typically, one of the negatives of not making your own chips is lower margins as can be seen with this Intel/AMD margin comparison.Although AMD is catching up, Intel still has a substantial margin advantage.3. Intel's IP (Intellectual Property) should give it an advantage in the chip-making market.Intel has more than 60,000 patents total including thefifthmost in the world in 2020.In fact, just in December 2021, Intel filed more than 170 patents with most of them having to do with process technology.By offering to combine their proprietary technology with their customer's technology, Intel can offer better results for the same price.4. The ARMy is coming for both Intel and AMD.Many companies including Apple \"Apple May Build 40-Core ARM-Based Mac Pro, Plans 10-Core MacBook Pro\", Google\" Google is designing its own Arm-based processors for 2023 Chromebooks\", and Amazon\"Category: Graviton\"are going with ARM chips for their proprietary chip needs.The advantage Intel has in the case of customers going to ARM is to fabricate those ARM chips in their fabs using their proprietary technology to make a superior product. With the huge number of fabs Intel is building they will also be able to provide better delivery times and volumes too.AMD, on the other hand, will have to make their X86 even more superior than it is now and that will be no easy trick. They don't make their own chips so they can't possibly manufacture any chips for others.AMD's customer base is very concentrated with the top five customers, including HP, Microsoft, and Sony, representing 54% of overall revenue and 70% of graphics revenue. It would be hard to imagine that those customers are not considering ARM for at least some of their chip requirements.Conclusion: Is Intel or AMD Stock the Better Buy?As the 50-year competition between Intel and AMD moves forward, big changes will be coming for both companies, but especially Intel.Intel will become one of the biggest fabricators in the world while AMD continues its innovation success under Lisa Su. Intel is also moving on to other technology revenue sources such as autos with Mobileye and a new ARM competitor SiFive. SiFive has developed a RISC (Reduced Instruction Set Computer) that could replace ARM in phones as well as other devices.Here's SiFive's CEO Patrick Little:\"By 2023, you're likely to see the first mobile phone with RISC-V,\" SiFive Chief Executive Patrick Little said in an October interview. \"I think we have an excellent shot at the phone.\"Source: MSNIf that does come true, the chips for both Mobileye and SiFive will be manufactured on one of Intel's fabs using both SiFive's and Intel's proprietary technology to take on ARM head to head.Decades ago it looked like AMD founder Jerry Sanders was channeling the future, Lisa Su:\"We’re winning the fight, but they are a very formidable competitor. Intel has managed to put everybody else out of the business except us. So it's a two-man game right now. We're the challenger, they're the champion. But I think we've got a great chance here to continue to gain market share.\"Exactly right I would say.With a forward PE of 10 and a growing 3% dividend, Intel is a low-risk option on the rapidly accelerating chip-future of the world regardless of the task at hand. AMD, with a PE of 55, is certainly riskier but has proven itself to be more than competitive over the last five years. Never count Lisa Su and AMD out.In my opinion, Intel is the better choice for the next five years because of its unique ability to expand fabs worldwide and its rather mundane expectations, and very modest PE ratio.Intel is a buy if you have a five-year plan.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":887,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":164003950,"gmtCreate":1624159788770,"gmtModify":1703829795042,"author":{"id":"3562919640401993","authorId":"3562919640401993","name":"Jiangbox","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7379f7108480b709cc9a6a874592f0ae","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3562919640401993","authorIdStr":"3562919640401993"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Will consider to add more.","listText":"Will consider to add more.","text":"Will consider to add more.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/164003950","repostId":"1192473918","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1192473918","pubTimestamp":1624029343,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1192473918?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-18 23:15","market":"us","language":"en","title":"PLTR Stock: The Palantir-FAA Deal News Should Have Investors Smiling Today","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1192473918","media":"investorplace","summary":"Palantir Technologies(NYSE:PLTR) stock is on the move Friday following news of a deal with the Feder","content":"<p><b>Palantir Technologies</b>(NYSE:<b><u>PLTR</u></b>) stock is on the move Friday following news of a deal with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA).</p>\n<p>The goal of this deal is toassist the FAA in modernizing its ” objectives for aviation safety.”This will have Palantir Technologies providing the agency with a data analyzing tool to help with that effort.</p>\n<p>According to a news release, this will have Palantir Technologies monitoring various safety aspects for the FAA. That includes reintegrating the 737 MAX fleet back into service after it was suspended due to fatal crashes.</p>\n<p>Palantir Technologies’ deal with the FAA is set to last for one year. However, there’s also the option to extend it by up to two years. The agreement has a maximum value of $18.4 million.</p>\n<p>Akash Jain, president of Palantir USG, said the following about the agreement with the FAA that should have PLTR stock gaining today.</p>\n<blockquote>\n “We are proud to be partnering with the Federal Aviation Administration to support their critical safety mission.”\n</blockquote>\n<p>The fact that PLTR stock is actually moving lower today despite this news is strange. The company’s shares did start off rising in early morning trading, but quickly fell back down to yesterday’s close before dipping even lower.</p>\n<p>It’s also worth noting that trading volume isn’t taking off on news of the FAA deal, either. As of this writing, more than 20 million shares of PLTR stock had changed hands. That’s still well below the company’s daily average trading volume of 57.8 million shares.</p>\n<p>PLTR stock was down 1.1% as of Friday morning.</p>","source":"lsy1606302653667","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>PLTR Stock: The Palantir-FAA Deal News Should Have Investors Smiling Today</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nPLTR Stock: The Palantir-FAA Deal News Should Have Investors Smiling Today\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-06-18 23:15 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://investorplace.com/2021/06/pltr-stock-the-palantir-faa-deal-news-should-have-investors-smiling-today/><strong>investorplace</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Palantir Technologies(NYSE:PLTR) stock is on the move Friday following news of a deal with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA).\nThe goal of this deal is toassist the FAA in modernizing its ” ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://investorplace.com/2021/06/pltr-stock-the-palantir-faa-deal-news-should-have-investors-smiling-today/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"PLTR":"Palantir Technologies Inc."},"source_url":"https://investorplace.com/2021/06/pltr-stock-the-palantir-faa-deal-news-should-have-investors-smiling-today/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1192473918","content_text":"Palantir Technologies(NYSE:PLTR) stock is on the move Friday following news of a deal with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA).\nThe goal of this deal is toassist the FAA in modernizing its ” objectives for aviation safety.”This will have Palantir Technologies providing the agency with a data analyzing tool to help with that effort.\nAccording to a news release, this will have Palantir Technologies monitoring various safety aspects for the FAA. That includes reintegrating the 737 MAX fleet back into service after it was suspended due to fatal crashes.\nPalantir Technologies’ deal with the FAA is set to last for one year. However, there’s also the option to extend it by up to two years. The agreement has a maximum value of $18.4 million.\nAkash Jain, president of Palantir USG, said the following about the agreement with the FAA that should have PLTR stock gaining today.\n\n “We are proud to be partnering with the Federal Aviation Administration to support their critical safety mission.”\n\nThe fact that PLTR stock is actually moving lower today despite this news is strange. The company’s shares did start off rising in early morning trading, but quickly fell back down to yesterday’s close before dipping even lower.\nIt’s also worth noting that trading volume isn’t taking off on news of the FAA deal, either. As of this writing, more than 20 million shares of PLTR stock had changed hands. That’s still well below the company’s daily average trading volume of 57.8 million shares.\nPLTR stock was down 1.1% as of Friday morning.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":410,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":367773296,"gmtCreate":1614983785515,"gmtModify":1704777876064,"author":{"id":"3562919640401993","authorId":"3562919640401993","name":"Jiangbox","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7379f7108480b709cc9a6a874592f0ae","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3562919640401993","authorIdStr":"3562919640401993"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"What can go in to buy?","listText":"What can go in to buy?","text":"What can go in to buy?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/367773296","repostId":"1196034072","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1196034072","pubTimestamp":1614953178,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1196034072?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-03-05 22:06","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Is The Nio Sell-Off Overdone?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1196034072","media":"Benzinga","summary":"NIO Inc.  shares have been soundly thrashed in the tech sell-off, and thequarterlyreport released ea","content":"<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NIO\">NIO Inc.</a> &nbsp;shares have been soundly thrashed in the tech sell-off, and thequarterlyreport released&nbsp;earlier this week did little to assuage sentiment. The stock is now in bear market territory, having pulled back 35.7 % from the Feb. 10 high of $64.60.</p><p>Is the sell-off in the shares justified? Did fundamentals flash the red light to investors, who were thronging to the stock in droves ahead of the current downturn?</p><p><b>The 2020 Highs:</b>&nbsp;The COVID-19 pandemic, which broke out at the end of 2019 and ravaged the global economies for much of 2020, proved a blessing for some companies that benefited from the adversity.</p><p>Nio, a luxury EV maker, should have taken a big hit in the year, as cash-strapped users preferred to hold back on big-ticket buys. The company did have its momentum of despair in the first two months of 2020. Not bogged down by the adverse geopolitical milieu, the EV startup chose to be proactive instead. The company announced several innovative product andservice offerings.</p><p>Deliveries continued to climb through the year, with Nio's charismatic CEO William Bin attributing the strength to the growing recognition of its premium brand, the competitive and compelling products and services, the expanding sales network, and most importantly, the&nbsp;support from its passionate and loyal user community.</p><p>For 2020, Nio delivered 43,728 vehicles, an increase of 111% year-over-year.</p><p>The company also managed to rein in costs, giving margins a lift. It also succeeded in mobilizing finances through a combination of equity, debt and strategic investments, removing a key existential risk it faced in 2019.</p><p>Promptly the stock began discounting the fundamental improvement and closed out 2020 with a gain in excess of 1,100%. The strong rally stretched valuation to levels, with some skeptics beginning to question the irrational exuberance in the stock.</p><p><b>Fundamentals, Stock Pause At Start of 2021:</b>&nbsp;Nio had a strong start to the year, as it continued to clock record monthly deliveries in January. The stock raced to a record high of $66.99 on Jan. 11, as it reacted to the announcements the company made at the annual Nio Day held on Jan. 10.</p><p>Thereafter, it has been a bumpy ride for the stock. Since the start of February, the stock has been caught in the vortex of the tech sell-off. Incidentally, market leader and EV pioneer<b>Tesla, Inc.</b>TSLAwas not spared either. Since the all-time split-adjusted high of $900.40 hit in late January, Tesla shares have given back over 30%.</p><p>Nio investors were pinning their hopes on a stellar fourth-quarter report to lift the stock from the depressed levels. It was not to be. The stock continued to bleed despite the EV maker reporting $1 billion&nbsp;revenues for the quarter and seeing an expansion in gross margins.</p><p>Naysayers were quick to highlight the wider-than-expected loss and the month-over-month drop in deliveries.</p><p>As outlined by Deutsche Bank Securities analyst Edison Yu, the underperformance on the bottom line had to do with forex losses, engendered by a weaker dollar.</p><p>Although initially Nio did not explain away the February softness, it later clarified in a blog post&nbsp;the weeklong Lunar New Year holiday that fell in the month played spoilsport.</p><p>\"The majority of the employees receive seven days off work as a public holiday to spend time with their families, though the celebrations can last for more than two weeks nationwide. Most of the factories were shut down for weeks, and many products that rely on shipping and manufacturing might have been delayed,\" Nio said in the post.</p><p><b>Is Recovery In The Cards:</b>&nbsp;The company has several catalysts ahead, including the launch of its first sedan, named ET7, and its plan to expand into Europe this year. The company is also making solid progress with respect to its advanced driver-assisted system, battery technology and battery swapping stations.</p><p>With the increasing uptake of its battery-as-a-service offering and its recently announced autonomous driving-as-a-service, the company has laid the groundwork for recurrent revenue streams.</p><p>This apart, the attractive market opportunity presented by the burgeoning EV market, both domestically and globally, will prove salubrious for the company. There is no denying the fact that EV manufacturing is turning out to be a crowded field. However, early entrants such as Nio are at an advantage, given their experiences in grinding it out in the early stages.</p><p>Patient investors, who are willing to ride out the trying times, could be in for rich rewards when things settle down.</p><p>Nio shares closed down 5.5% at $39.28, with the stock dropping below the $40 handle for the first time since mid-December.</p>","source":"lsy1606299360108","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Is The Nio Sell-Off Overdone?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nIs The Nio Sell-Off Overdone?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-03-05 22:06 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.benzinga.com/news/21/03/20016348/is-the-nio-sell-off-overdone><strong>Benzinga</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>NIO Inc.  shares have been soundly thrashed in the tech sell-off, and thequarterlyreport released earlier this week did little to assuage sentiment. The stock is now in bear market territory, having ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.benzinga.com/news/21/03/20016348/is-the-nio-sell-off-overdone\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NIO":"蔚来"},"source_url":"https://www.benzinga.com/news/21/03/20016348/is-the-nio-sell-off-overdone","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1196034072","content_text":"NIO Inc.  shares have been soundly thrashed in the tech sell-off, and thequarterlyreport released earlier this week did little to assuage sentiment. The stock is now in bear market territory, having pulled back 35.7 % from the Feb. 10 high of $64.60.Is the sell-off in the shares justified? Did fundamentals flash the red light to investors, who were thronging to the stock in droves ahead of the current downturn?The 2020 Highs: The COVID-19 pandemic, which broke out at the end of 2019 and ravaged the global economies for much of 2020, proved a blessing for some companies that benefited from the adversity.Nio, a luxury EV maker, should have taken a big hit in the year, as cash-strapped users preferred to hold back on big-ticket buys. The company did have its momentum of despair in the first two months of 2020. Not bogged down by the adverse geopolitical milieu, the EV startup chose to be proactive instead. The company announced several innovative product andservice offerings.Deliveries continued to climb through the year, with Nio's charismatic CEO William Bin attributing the strength to the growing recognition of its premium brand, the competitive and compelling products and services, the expanding sales network, and most importantly, the support from its passionate and loyal user community.For 2020, Nio delivered 43,728 vehicles, an increase of 111% year-over-year.The company also managed to rein in costs, giving margins a lift. It also succeeded in mobilizing finances through a combination of equity, debt and strategic investments, removing a key existential risk it faced in 2019.Promptly the stock began discounting the fundamental improvement and closed out 2020 with a gain in excess of 1,100%. The strong rally stretched valuation to levels, with some skeptics beginning to question the irrational exuberance in the stock.Fundamentals, Stock Pause At Start of 2021: Nio had a strong start to the year, as it continued to clock record monthly deliveries in January. The stock raced to a record high of $66.99 on Jan. 11, as it reacted to the announcements the company made at the annual Nio Day held on Jan. 10.Thereafter, it has been a bumpy ride for the stock. Since the start of February, the stock has been caught in the vortex of the tech sell-off. Incidentally, market leader and EV pioneerTesla, Inc.TSLAwas not spared either. Since the all-time split-adjusted high of $900.40 hit in late January, Tesla shares have given back over 30%.Nio investors were pinning their hopes on a stellar fourth-quarter report to lift the stock from the depressed levels. It was not to be. The stock continued to bleed despite the EV maker reporting $1 billion revenues for the quarter and seeing an expansion in gross margins.Naysayers were quick to highlight the wider-than-expected loss and the month-over-month drop in deliveries.As outlined by Deutsche Bank Securities analyst Edison Yu, the underperformance on the bottom line had to do with forex losses, engendered by a weaker dollar.Although initially Nio did not explain away the February softness, it later clarified in a blog post the weeklong Lunar New Year holiday that fell in the month played spoilsport.\"The majority of the employees receive seven days off work as a public holiday to spend time with their families, though the celebrations can last for more than two weeks nationwide. Most of the factories were shut down for weeks, and many products that rely on shipping and manufacturing might have been delayed,\" Nio said in the post.Is Recovery In The Cards: The company has several catalysts ahead, including the launch of its first sedan, named ET7, and its plan to expand into Europe this year. The company is also making solid progress with respect to its advanced driver-assisted system, battery technology and battery swapping stations.With the increasing uptake of its battery-as-a-service offering and its recently announced autonomous driving-as-a-service, the company has laid the groundwork for recurrent revenue streams.This apart, the attractive market opportunity presented by the burgeoning EV market, both domestically and globally, will prove salubrious for the company. There is no denying the fact that EV manufacturing is turning out to be a crowded field. However, early entrants such as Nio are at an advantage, given their experiences in grinding it out in the early stages.Patient investors, who are willing to ride out the trying times, could be in for rich rewards when things settle down.Nio shares closed down 5.5% at $39.28, with the stock dropping below the $40 handle for the first time since mid-December.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":86,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":380449105,"gmtCreate":1612579454307,"gmtModify":1704873040954,"author":{"id":"3562919640401993","authorId":"3562919640401993","name":"Jiangbox","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7379f7108480b709cc9a6a874592f0ae","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3562919640401993","authorIdStr":"3562919640401993"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Crazy.","listText":"Crazy.","text":"Crazy.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/380449105","repostId":"1161551882","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":127,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}