咩咩虎 personal page - To The Moon

咩咩虎

咩咩虎

No personal profile

14Follow

29Followers

1Topic

0Badge

2023-02-22

Ok

@pretiming:US Stoks price range over the next 10 days- QCOM,PYPL,PTON,PLUG,PLTR,PINS,PFE,PDD&PBF

2023-02-02

Shateejsjsjshsjajsh hahahahaha

2023-02-02

Tesla is the best best bets

2023-02-02

Favourite CNY Snacks drinks

2023-02-02

Just sharing feds meeting

2023-01-25

Ok

@The Finance Hydra: S&P500 | The Next Move Will Be UNSTOPPABLE.

2023-01-11

Ok hhhhjuuhgggggvbhhhh

2023-01-08

Ok

@TigerEvents:Join Tiger's Football Season, share the prizes worth up to US$200,000

2023-01-08

Oh

2022-03-30

Ok

Does Tesla (TSLA) Stock Pay Dividends?

2022-03-29

Ok

Palantir: Emerging From The Ashes

2022-03-28

Lok

3 Autonomous Vehicle Stocks to Buy Ahead of the Mobileye IPO

2022-03-27

Ok

SoFi Stock Bulls Can Rejoice as a Great Catalyst Is Coming Up

2022-03-26

Ok

US STOCKS-S&P 500 Ends Higher with Financials as Treasury Yields Jump

2022-03-25

Ok

Uber Stock Soars 5% on Deal to List All New York Taxis on App

2022-03-23

Ok

Cathie Wood Goes Bargain Hunting: 3 Stocks She Just Bought

2022-03-22

Ok

Why Shares of Coinbase Fell Nearly 5% on Monday

2022-03-21

Nice

Is Tesla a Good Stock to Buy in 2022? Yes, But Carefully.

2022-03-17

Ok

Powell’s Press Conference Transcript: U.S. Economy Is Strong and Can Weather Rate Increases

2022-03-16

Ok

Tesla Stops Work at Shanghai Factory for Two Days Amid China COVID Curbs - Internal Notice

Go to Tiger App to see more news

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"userPageInfo":{"id":3568542354994015,"uuid":"3568542354994015","gmtCreate":1605449972044,"gmtModify":1612435011971,"name":"咩咩虎","pinyin":"mmhmiemiehu","introduction":"","introductionEn":"","signature":"","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a6663bef57eca539a2c52ea184964654","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":29,"headSize":14,"tweetSize":244,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":2,"name":"无畏虎","nameTw":"無畏虎","represent":"初生牛犊","factor":"发布3条非转发主帖,1条获得他人回复或点赞","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":1,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":2,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":"success","userBadges":[{"badgeId":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493-2","templateUuid":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493","name":"Senior Tiger","description":"Join the tiger community for 1000 days","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0063fb68ea29c9ae6858c58630e182d5","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/96c699a93be4214d4b49aea6a5a5d1a4","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/35b0e542a9ff77046ed69ef602bc105d","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":1,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.08.13","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"44212b71d0be4ec88898348dbe882e03-2","templateUuid":"44212b71d0be4ec88898348dbe882e03","name":"Executive Tiger","description":"The transaction amount of the securities account reaches $300,000","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9d20b23f1b6335407f882bc5c2ad12c0","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ada3b4533518ace8404a3f6dd192bd29","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/177f283ba21d1c077054dac07f88f3bd","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.07.14","exceedPercentage":"80.64%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1101},{"badgeId":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789-1","templateUuid":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789","name":"Knowledgeable Investor","description":"Traded more than 10 stocks","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e74cc24115c4fbae6154ec1b1041bf47","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d48265cbfd97c57f9048db29f22227b0","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76c6d6898b073c77e1c537ebe9ac1c57","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1102},{"badgeId":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84-1","templateUuid":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84","name":"Real Trader","description":"Completed a transaction","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100},{"badgeId":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be-2","templateUuid":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be","name":"Master Trader","description":"Total number of securities or futures transactions reached 100","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ad22cfbe2d05aa393b18e9226e4b0307","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/36702e6ff3ffe46acafee66cc85273ca","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d52eb88fa385cf5abe2616ed63781765","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":"80.68%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":5,"currentWearingBadge":{"badgeId":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493-2","templateUuid":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493","name":"Senior Tiger","description":"Join the tiger community for 1000 days","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0063fb68ea29c9ae6858c58630e182d5","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/96c699a93be4214d4b49aea6a5a5d1a4","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/35b0e542a9ff77046ed69ef602bc105d","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":1,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.08.13","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":null,"starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"post","tweets":[{"id":9957352574,"gmtCreate":1677034836699,"gmtModify":1677034840451,"author":{"id":"3568542354994015","authorId":"3568542354994015","name":"咩咩虎","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a6663bef57eca539a2c52ea184964654","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9957352574","repostId":"9957352889","repostType":1,"repost":{"id":9957352889,"gmtCreate":1677034587341,"gmtModify":1677034601307,"author":{"id":"4118987771438342","authorId":"4118987771438342","name":"pretiming","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/1f75b6bd0b761b1685abd21276b814cf","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"themes":[],"title":"US Stoks price range over the next 10 days- QCOM,PYPL,PTON,PLUG,PLTR,PINS,PFE,PDD&PBF","htmlText":"Hello,&nbsp;Everyone. Taday,&nbsp;I'll give you a 10-day forecast of U.S. stock prices:&nbsp;<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/QCOM\">$Qualcomm(QCOM)$</a> <a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/PYPL\">$PayPal(PYPL)$</a> <a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/PTON\">$Peloton Interactive, Inc.(PTON)$</a> <a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/PLUG\">$Plug Power(PLUG)$</a> <a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/PLTR\">$Palantir Technologies Inc.(PLTR)$</a> <a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/PINS\">$Pinterest, Inc.(PINS)$</a> <a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/PFE\">$Pfizer(PFE)$</a> <a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/PDD\">$Pinduoduo Inc.(PDD)$</a> <a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/PBF\">$PBF Energy Inc(PBF)$</a> 1.<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/QCOM\">$Qualcomm(QCOM)$</a> SellThe current trend is an Adjustment trend. The OPEN-pric","listText":"Hello,&nbsp;Everyone. Taday,&nbsp;I'll give you a 10-day forecast of U.S. stock prices:&nbsp;<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/QCOM\">$Qualcomm(QCOM)$</a> <a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/PYPL\">$PayPal(PYPL)$</a> <a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/PTON\">$Peloton Interactive, Inc.(PTON)$</a> <a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/PLUG\">$Plug Power(PLUG)$</a> <a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/PLTR\">$Palantir Technologies Inc.(PLTR)$</a> <a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/PINS\">$Pinterest, Inc.(PINS)$</a> <a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/PFE\">$Pfizer(PFE)$</a> <a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/PDD\">$Pinduoduo Inc.(PDD)$</a> <a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/PBF\">$PBF Energy Inc(PBF)$</a> 1.<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/QCOM\">$Qualcomm(QCOM)$</a> SellThe current trend is an Adjustment trend. The OPEN-pric","text":"Hello, Everyone. Taday, I'll give you a 10-day forecast of U.S. stock prices: $Qualcomm(QCOM)$ $PayPal(PYPL)$ $Peloton Interactive, Inc.(PTON)$ $Plug Power(PLUG)$ $Palantir Technologies Inc.(PLTR)$ $Pinterest, Inc.(PINS)$ $Pfizer(PFE)$ $Pinduoduo Inc.(PDD)$ $PBF Energy Inc(PBF)$ 1.$Qualcomm(QCOM)$ SellThe current trend is an Adjustment trend. The OPEN-pric","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/9509d28101a8e057a4413c848b08be52","width":"-1","height":"-1"},{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/387230d68dc4a2c68717ca1d90fecf0c","width":"-1","height":"-1"},{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/7cf20e9cc35a4efb5e4203eb1421e8e8","width":"-1","height":"-1"}],"top":1,"highlighted":2,"essential":2,"paper":2,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9957352889","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":0,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":9,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":111,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9955869022,"gmtCreate":1675338113366,"gmtModify":1676538994455,"author":{"id":"3568542354994015","authorId":"3568542354994015","name":"咩咩虎","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a6663bef57eca539a2c52ea184964654","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Shateejsjsjshsjajsh hahahahaha&nbsp;","listText":"Shateejsjsjshsjajsh hahahahaha&nbsp;","text":"Shateejsjsjshsjajsh hahahahaha","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9955869022","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":55,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9955860755,"gmtCreate":1675338092577,"gmtModify":1676538994455,"author":{"id":"3568542354994015","authorId":"3568542354994015","name":"咩咩虎","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a6663bef57eca539a2c52ea184964654","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Tesla is the best best bets&nbsp;","listText":"Tesla is the best best bets&nbsp;","text":"Tesla is the best best bets","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9955860755","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":158,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9955860309,"gmtCreate":1675337872102,"gmtModify":1676538994296,"author":{"id":"3568542354994015","authorId":"3568542354994015","name":"咩咩虎","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a6663bef57eca539a2c52ea184964654","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Favourite CNY Snacks drinks&nbsp;","listText":"Favourite CNY Snacks drinks&nbsp;","text":"Favourite CNY Snacks drinks","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/3af1164bb9a14576db092d02ec1a0108","width":"1188","height":"1296"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9955860309","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":128,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":2,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9955887581,"gmtCreate":1675337704343,"gmtModify":1676538994277,"author":{"id":"3568542354994015","authorId":"3568542354994015","name":"咩咩虎","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a6663bef57eca539a2c52ea184964654","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Just sharing feds meeting&nbsp;","listText":"Just sharing feds meeting&nbsp;","text":"Just sharing feds meeting","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9955887581","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":213,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9952853928,"gmtCreate":1674631430865,"gmtModify":1676538949841,"author":{"id":"3568542354994015","authorId":"3568542354994015","name":"咩咩虎","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a6663bef57eca539a2c52ea184964654","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9952853928","repostId":"9952850643","repostType":1,"repost":{"id":9952850643,"gmtCreate":1674629856082,"gmtModify":1676538949777,"author":{"id":"3479274819487659","authorId":"3479274819487659","name":"The Finance Hydra","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/a242a9be28de8ea5e320d9cee36651ca","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"themes":[],"htmlText":"\n \n \n  S&amp;P500 | The Next Move Will Be UNSTOPPABLE.\n \n","listText":"S&amp;P500 | The Next Move Will Be UNSTOPPABLE.","text":"S&P500 | The Next Move Will Be UNSTOPPABLE.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":2,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9952850643","isVote":1,"tweetType":2,"object":{"id":"14c71eec3b524376b9d174c8b7369f40","tweetId":"9952850643","title":"S&amp;P500 | The Next Move Will Be UNSTOPPABLE.","videoUrl":"http://v.tigerbbs.com/16746298521323d5b8873e2a5d806a6d80402f079284a.mp4","poster":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c9600a080ca414366a6e20e20ec4fffb","shareLink":"http://v.tigerbbs.com/16746298521323d5b8873e2a5d806a6d80402f079284a.mp4"},"viewCount":0,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":164,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9951332725,"gmtCreate":1673395906367,"gmtModify":1676538829639,"author":{"id":"3568542354994015","authorId":"3568542354994015","name":"咩咩虎","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a6663bef57eca539a2c52ea184964654","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok hhhhjuuhgggggvbhhhh","listText":"Ok hhhhjuuhgggggvbhhhh","text":"Ok hhhhjuuhgggggvbhhhh","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9951332725","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":115,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9953925658,"gmtCreate":1673140798875,"gmtModify":1676538791009,"author":{"id":"3568542354994015","authorId":"3568542354994015","name":"咩咩虎","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a6663bef57eca539a2c52ea184964654","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9953925658","repostId":"9963969638","repostType":1,"repost":{"id":9963969638,"gmtCreate":1668567458425,"gmtModify":1677745765888,"author":{"id":"3527667667103859","authorId":"3527667667103859","name":"TigerEvents","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/61ed9b39c6cbcdce6372edc1c0b48a2d","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"themes":[],"title":"Join Tiger's Football Season, share the prizes worth up to US$200,000","htmlText":"This year is the year of football, the Qatar World Cup, AFF championship, make the following days a big carnival for football fans all around the world!&nbsp;While you enjoy your football carnival, don't forget to join in Tiger's Football Season on Tiger Trade App, and share the prizes worth up to USD 200,000!Play the \"Perfect Goals\" game with us, and feel the score moment by only pressing the button.Keep completing the daily tasks and play the game, win more points to redeem stock vouchers worth up to USD 2,000 or AFF tickets, and the top prize - the free journey of watching the AFF finals!You can also predict a football match of the World Cup or AFF Championship, and cheer for your home team.Besides, you may obtain the Tiger Football Card by participating in the campaign every day.Goalke","listText":"This year is the year of football, the Qatar World Cup, AFF championship, make the following days a big carnival for football fans all around the world!&nbsp;While you enjoy your football carnival, don't forget to join in Tiger's Football Season on Tiger Trade App, and share the prizes worth up to USD 200,000!Play the \"Perfect Goals\" game with us, and feel the score moment by only pressing the button.Keep completing the daily tasks and play the game, win more points to redeem stock vouchers worth up to USD 2,000 or AFF tickets, and the top prize - the free journey of watching the AFF finals!You can also predict a football match of the World Cup or AFF Championship, and cheer for your home team.Besides, you may obtain the Tiger Football Card by participating in the campaign every day.Goalke","text":"This year is the year of football, the Qatar World Cup, AFF championship, make the following days a big carnival for football fans all around the world! While you enjoy your football carnival, don't forget to join in Tiger's Football Season on Tiger Trade App, and share the prizes worth up to USD 200,000!Play the \"Perfect Goals\" game with us, and feel the score moment by only pressing the button.Keep completing the daily tasks and play the game, win more points to redeem stock vouchers worth up to USD 2,000 or AFF tickets, and the top prize - the free journey of watching the AFF finals!You can also predict a football match of the World Cup or AFF Championship, and cheer for your home team.Besides, you may obtain the Tiger Football Card by participating in the campaign every day.Goalke","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/e8c9b6ab16214df413c77708cf5957bf","width":"404","height":"707"},{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/6f0ddb54cc9e55b9b9b59a0c9908bfb5","width":"358","height":"471"},{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/d9cc4adf57a9972e62e94d321ecc6734","width":"402","height":"712"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":2,"paper":2,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9963969638","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":0,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":4,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":144,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9953922812,"gmtCreate":1673140691436,"gmtModify":1676538790979,"author":{"id":"3568542354994015","authorId":"3568542354994015","name":"咩咩虎","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a6663bef57eca539a2c52ea184964654","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Oh","listText":"Oh","text":"Oh","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9953922812","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":102,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9019564175,"gmtCreate":1648610657891,"gmtModify":1676534364657,"author":{"id":"3568542354994015","authorId":"3568542354994015","name":"咩咩虎","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a6663bef57eca539a2c52ea184964654","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9019564175","repostId":"1154910285","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1154910285","pubTimestamp":1648607052,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1154910285?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-03-30 10:24","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Does Tesla (TSLA) Stock Pay Dividends?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1154910285","media":"InvestorPlace","summary":"DoesTesla(NASDAQ:TSLA) stock pay dividends?","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Does <b>Tesla</b>(NASDAQ:<b><u>TSLA</u></b>) stock pay dividends? Not typically. However, with news yesterday that the company is planning another stock split, this question is top of mind.</p><p>TSLA Stock Dividend History</p><p>Importantly, Tesla does not pay out any standard cash dividends to shareholders. In fact, it makes its positioning on this matter clear. Its website states that it does not anticipate ever issuing such a dividend, because it “[intends] on retaining all future earnings to finance future growth.”</p><p>However, there is a reason that investors are curious about Tesla dividends now. That is because when the company enacted its last stock split in 2020, it carried out a dividend payout. In the 5-for-1 stock split, each shareholder received an additional four shares for everyone one they held. The company said this was a way to make shares more accessible to employees and investors.</p><p>In this case, the dividend payout was the additional four shares. The main impact of this was that the stock split diluted shares.</p><p>After the stock split, however, TSLA stock took off. Shares have more than doubled since Tesla last split its shares.</p><p>Now, investors want to know what the new proposed stock split will mean.</p><p>The Upcoming Stock Split</p><p>Tesla has not revealed many details around the potential 2022 stock split, which still needs shareholder approval. We do know that the proposal will come to a vote at its next annual meeting, which is likely to take place in June. In the meantime, investors must wait for the release of its proxy statement. According to the 8-K filing, this document will include all necessary information.</p><p>One thing that the filing makes clear is that Tesla wants to issue another stock dividend. As it states, the company is seeking shareholder approval “in order to enable a stock split of the Company’s common stock in the form of a stock dividend.”</p><p>Its last stock split worked well for both investors and the company. Now Tesla needs to open itself up to new groups of investors, and another stock split makes perfect sense.</p><p>What Comes Next</p><p>Until Tesla releases its proxy statement, all investors can do is wait and watch closely. If shareholders do approve a stock split proposal, it is likely that TSLA stock could rise again.</p></body></html>","source":"lsy1606302653667","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Does Tesla (TSLA) Stock Pay Dividends?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nDoes Tesla (TSLA) Stock Pay Dividends?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-03-30 10:24 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://investorplace.com/2022/03/does-tesla-tsla-stock-pay-dividends/><strong>InvestorPlace</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Does Tesla(NASDAQ:TSLA) stock pay dividends? Not typically. However, with news yesterday that the company is planning another stock split, this question is top of mind.TSLA Stock Dividend ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://investorplace.com/2022/03/does-tesla-tsla-stock-pay-dividends/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"https://investorplace.com/2022/03/does-tesla-tsla-stock-pay-dividends/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1154910285","content_text":"Does Tesla(NASDAQ:TSLA) stock pay dividends? Not typically. However, with news yesterday that the company is planning another stock split, this question is top of mind.TSLA Stock Dividend HistoryImportantly, Tesla does not pay out any standard cash dividends to shareholders. In fact, it makes its positioning on this matter clear. Its website states that it does not anticipate ever issuing such a dividend, because it “[intends] on retaining all future earnings to finance future growth.”However, there is a reason that investors are curious about Tesla dividends now. That is because when the company enacted its last stock split in 2020, it carried out a dividend payout. In the 5-for-1 stock split, each shareholder received an additional four shares for everyone one they held. The company said this was a way to make shares more accessible to employees and investors.In this case, the dividend payout was the additional four shares. The main impact of this was that the stock split diluted shares.After the stock split, however, TSLA stock took off. Shares have more than doubled since Tesla last split its shares.Now, investors want to know what the new proposed stock split will mean.The Upcoming Stock SplitTesla has not revealed many details around the potential 2022 stock split, which still needs shareholder approval. We do know that the proposal will come to a vote at its next annual meeting, which is likely to take place in June. In the meantime, investors must wait for the release of its proxy statement. According to the 8-K filing, this document will include all necessary information.One thing that the filing makes clear is that Tesla wants to issue another stock dividend. As it states, the company is seeking shareholder approval “in order to enable a stock split of the Company’s common stock in the form of a stock dividend.”Its last stock split worked well for both investors and the company. Now Tesla needs to open itself up to new groups of investors, and another stock split makes perfect sense.What Comes NextUntil Tesla releases its proxy statement, all investors can do is wait and watch closely. If shareholders do approve a stock split proposal, it is likely that TSLA stock could rise again.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":284,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9019393860,"gmtCreate":1648523029062,"gmtModify":1676534349924,"author":{"id":"3568542354994015","authorId":"3568542354994015","name":"咩咩虎","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a6663bef57eca539a2c52ea184964654","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9019393860","repostId":"2222889107","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2222889107","pubTimestamp":1648520788,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2222889107?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-03-29 10:26","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Palantir: Emerging From The Ashes","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2222889107","media":"seekingalpha","summary":"We think the bottom is in for Palantir Technologies (NYSE:PLTR) stock. Period. End of article. In al","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>We think the bottom is in for Palantir Technologies (NYSE:PLTR) stock. Period. End of article. In all seriousness this was something we had said in late February when Palantir stock all but reset back to trade just about at its direct public offering price. The thing is that technology stocks, especially those that are potential game-changing names, are often extremely expensive in the early stages. You really cannot value them on an earnings basis because there are no earnings to be had. What <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> has to do is determine if what the company offers will solve enough headaches for customers that eventually the growing sales turn into profits. For years many of these stocks will lose money. But they lose money as they spend to attract customers. They invest heavily in their growth while seeing revenues increase dramatically. Palantir is seeing revenues grow tremendously.</p><p>Sometimes that growth fades and the company never really transforms the world like it set out to do. It is not uncommon that these stocks wither away to sub $1 then eventually delist to the OTC markets before going out of business. Happens a lot. Some argue this could happen to many of the innovation type companies. We admit, there are a number of companies that seem revolutionary at the time and then go bust years later. Even Cathie Wood abandoned Palantir just days after we thought the reset was complete and turned bullish. For those keeping score, the stock is up about 20% since that time. We digress.</p><p>But we see the bottom as in. Internal metrics improve year-after-year for Palantir and we see no reason why the ongoing growth will not eventually lead to real profits. Great companies always seem to start out losing money. Even after this rally, we remain bullish long-term. In the short-term, we have reason to be bullish based on the problems they solve and the horrible situation in Ukraine and the need to mine data for intelligence. We think so, for the long-term investor. We like a buy in this stock on any weakness. Sure, the stock is still expensive, even for high growth tech, but is much more reasonable compared to a few months ago. Keep in mind that the company is breaking even and making some money some quarters. When the company reported earnings, we saw that the growth remains on track. You can buy here.</p><h2>Our trade recommendation for PLTR stock remains valid</h2><p>Our last trade recommendation is still a set of entries we would follow</p><p>Target entry 1: $11.95-$12.15 40% of position</p><p>Target entry 2: $10.80-$11.00 60% of position</p><p>Stop loss: $9</p><p>Target exit: $13 real short-term, $15 medium-term</p><p>Options recommendations: Consider the April $12 puts for $0.45-$0.65 in premium. Call option buying is not nearly as pricey as a few weeks ago but you can consider the August $14 strike calls for $1-$1.50.</p><h2>Palantir - Both the government and commercial sectors are doing well</h2><p>In the recent quarter, performance was strong and ahead of consensus estimates. Total revenue grew 34% year-over-year to $433 million, beating estimates by almost $15 million.</p><p>Recall that there are two reporting segments for Palantir: the government and commercial segments. The commercial revenue stream has grown at a rapid rate over the last year, while government results are likely to get a big boost following international strife. While the war in Ukraine is an unexpected catalyst, the company has invested in itself to grow sales. To improve sales, Palantir has gone on a hiring spree. It expanded its sales team and they have been working to secure new orders. While the Government revenues have slowed their growth somewhat, they still rose 26% from last year, and the company added a total of 34 net new customers in the quarter. The commercial revenue is expanding rapidly increasing 132% in 2021, and up 47% in Q4 vs. last year.</p><p>Palantir is seeing very positive momentum in its margins. Positive movement in margins is important in a software company as it really highlights strengths, or weaknesses, in the way it distributes its products. What we mean is that if Palantir needs other companies to help move its products then gross margin would be tracking maybe 30-50%. When you have software companies with gross margins that are well over 50%, and approaching 60-70%, then it tends to mean the company is doing the heavy lifting itself. Palantir is delivering because gross margins expanded to 78% in the last year which is up double-digits from the prior year&#39;s quarters.</p><h2>Palantir is scratching the surface of profitability</h2><p>Even after the pull back in putting in a bottom in our opinion, the stock is expensive, like so many other growth tech names. The company lost $59 million in the quarter, but adjusted income from operations was $124 million. At the same time, and this is a big positive, the company is free cash flow positive. Adjusted free cash flow was $424 million for the year. That said, the company was profitable at a $0.02 adjusted EPS bottom line figure.</p><p>When it comes to valuation, you can look at the price to sales but it is still very high. At 16X sales, the stock is still expensive, factoring in the drop in shares to $12. Of course, this valuation is so much more down to Earth compared to when the stock exploded when it was 3X as high as it is now. The PEG ratio is respectable and we like the cash flow as we mentioned.</p><p>While the company is growing tremendously, the stock is still not without risk. The company could see government slash spending in tough times (like a recession which some say could come next year), though, some would argue that their technology saves the government money. Palantir brings software, artificial intelligence, and data into a solution to help government make decisions to centrally track things while identifying patterns and creating frameworks to assess impact of certain decisions. The Ukraine crisis may push faster adoption of the tech. On top of that, we see the commercials sales growing though a recession could lead to reduced spend on technology investments.</p><p>One risk we always hear about is the unrelenting stock based-compensation. We addressed that issue in this piece, but will reiterate that we like that management has acknowledge that it is a problem.</p><h2>Take home</h2><p>Look, the last month has seen some volatile action, but PLTR put in a bottom. If markets absolutely tank in a few months due to escalating war, really rapid rate hikes, or poor economic news, shares could fall back to lows, but we think the sentiment and momentum is on the bulls&#39; side. Even with a rebound, shares have been crushed still. We see a regression to the mean as likely, which would be the mid-teens for this stock. The company operates with no debt and has nice positive free cash flow. With the growth the company is displaying, and with it clawing at profitability with some positive catalysts putting wind in the sails, we remain bullish.</p></body></html>","source":"seekingalpha","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Palantir: Emerging From The Ashes</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nPalantir: Emerging From The Ashes\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-03-29 10:26 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4498129-palantir-pltr-stock-emerging-from-ashes><strong>seekingalpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>We think the bottom is in for Palantir Technologies (NYSE:PLTR) stock. Period. End of article. In all seriousness this was something we had said in late February when Palantir stock all but reset back...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4498129-palantir-pltr-stock-emerging-from-ashes\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BK4547":"WSB热门概念","PLTR":"Palantir Technologies Inc.","BK4543":"AI","BK4023":"应用软件"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4498129-palantir-pltr-stock-emerging-from-ashes","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5a36db9d73b4222bc376d24ccc48c8a4","article_id":"2222889107","content_text":"We think the bottom is in for Palantir Technologies (NYSE:PLTR) stock. Period. End of article. In all seriousness this was something we had said in late February when Palantir stock all but reset back to trade just about at its direct public offering price. The thing is that technology stocks, especially those that are potential game-changing names, are often extremely expensive in the early stages. You really cannot value them on an earnings basis because there are no earnings to be had. What one has to do is determine if what the company offers will solve enough headaches for customers that eventually the growing sales turn into profits. For years many of these stocks will lose money. But they lose money as they spend to attract customers. They invest heavily in their growth while seeing revenues increase dramatically. Palantir is seeing revenues grow tremendously.Sometimes that growth fades and the company never really transforms the world like it set out to do. It is not uncommon that these stocks wither away to sub $1 then eventually delist to the OTC markets before going out of business. Happens a lot. Some argue this could happen to many of the innovation type companies. We admit, there are a number of companies that seem revolutionary at the time and then go bust years later. Even Cathie Wood abandoned Palantir just days after we thought the reset was complete and turned bullish. For those keeping score, the stock is up about 20% since that time. We digress.But we see the bottom as in. Internal metrics improve year-after-year for Palantir and we see no reason why the ongoing growth will not eventually lead to real profits. Great companies always seem to start out losing money. Even after this rally, we remain bullish long-term. In the short-term, we have reason to be bullish based on the problems they solve and the horrible situation in Ukraine and the need to mine data for intelligence. We think so, for the long-term investor. We like a buy in this stock on any weakness. Sure, the stock is still expensive, even for high growth tech, but is much more reasonable compared to a few months ago. Keep in mind that the company is breaking even and making some money some quarters. When the company reported earnings, we saw that the growth remains on track. You can buy here.Our trade recommendation for PLTR stock remains validOur last trade recommendation is still a set of entries we would followTarget entry 1: $11.95-$12.15 40% of positionTarget entry 2: $10.80-$11.00 60% of positionStop loss: $9Target exit: $13 real short-term, $15 medium-termOptions recommendations: Consider the April $12 puts for $0.45-$0.65 in premium. Call option buying is not nearly as pricey as a few weeks ago but you can consider the August $14 strike calls for $1-$1.50.Palantir - Both the government and commercial sectors are doing wellIn the recent quarter, performance was strong and ahead of consensus estimates. Total revenue grew 34% year-over-year to $433 million, beating estimates by almost $15 million.Recall that there are two reporting segments for Palantir: the government and commercial segments. The commercial revenue stream has grown at a rapid rate over the last year, while government results are likely to get a big boost following international strife. While the war in Ukraine is an unexpected catalyst, the company has invested in itself to grow sales. To improve sales, Palantir has gone on a hiring spree. It expanded its sales team and they have been working to secure new orders. While the Government revenues have slowed their growth somewhat, they still rose 26% from last year, and the company added a total of 34 net new customers in the quarter. The commercial revenue is expanding rapidly increasing 132% in 2021, and up 47% in Q4 vs. last year.Palantir is seeing very positive momentum in its margins. Positive movement in margins is important in a software company as it really highlights strengths, or weaknesses, in the way it distributes its products. What we mean is that if Palantir needs other companies to help move its products then gross margin would be tracking maybe 30-50%. When you have software companies with gross margins that are well over 50%, and approaching 60-70%, then it tends to mean the company is doing the heavy lifting itself. Palantir is delivering because gross margins expanded to 78% in the last year which is up double-digits from the prior year's quarters.Palantir is scratching the surface of profitabilityEven after the pull back in putting in a bottom in our opinion, the stock is expensive, like so many other growth tech names. The company lost $59 million in the quarter, but adjusted income from operations was $124 million. At the same time, and this is a big positive, the company is free cash flow positive. Adjusted free cash flow was $424 million for the year. That said, the company was profitable at a $0.02 adjusted EPS bottom line figure.When it comes to valuation, you can look at the price to sales but it is still very high. At 16X sales, the stock is still expensive, factoring in the drop in shares to $12. Of course, this valuation is so much more down to Earth compared to when the stock exploded when it was 3X as high as it is now. The PEG ratio is respectable and we like the cash flow as we mentioned.While the company is growing tremendously, the stock is still not without risk. The company could see government slash spending in tough times (like a recession which some say could come next year), though, some would argue that their technology saves the government money. Palantir brings software, artificial intelligence, and data into a solution to help government make decisions to centrally track things while identifying patterns and creating frameworks to assess impact of certain decisions. The Ukraine crisis may push faster adoption of the tech. On top of that, we see the commercials sales growing though a recession could lead to reduced spend on technology investments.One risk we always hear about is the unrelenting stock based-compensation. We addressed that issue in this piece, but will reiterate that we like that management has acknowledge that it is a problem.Take homeLook, the last month has seen some volatile action, but PLTR put in a bottom. If markets absolutely tank in a few months due to escalating war, really rapid rate hikes, or poor economic news, shares could fall back to lows, but we think the sentiment and momentum is on the bulls' side. Even with a rebound, shares have been crushed still. We see a regression to the mean as likely, which would be the mid-teens for this stock. The company operates with no debt and has nice positive free cash flow. With the growth the company is displaying, and with it clawing at profitability with some positive catalysts putting wind in the sails, we remain bullish.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":115,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9010575198,"gmtCreate":1648436827714,"gmtModify":1676534337757,"author":{"id":"3568542354994015","authorId":"3568542354994015","name":"咩咩虎","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a6663bef57eca539a2c52ea184964654","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Lok","listText":"Lok","text":"Lok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9010575198","repostId":"1153047568","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1153047568","pubTimestamp":1648251874,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1153047568?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-03-26 07:44","market":"us","language":"en","title":"3 Autonomous Vehicle Stocks to Buy Ahead of the Mobileye IPO","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1153047568","media":"investorplace","summary":"Restrictions due to the coronavirus and regulatory issues have slowed the progress of autonomous vehicles more than I thought they would. However, I still believe that long-term investors will ultimat","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Restrictions due to the coronavirus and regulatory issues have slowed the progress of autonomous vehicles more than I thought they would. However, I still believe that long-term investors will ultimately benefit a great deal from buying autonomous driving stocks. Many companies, including Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG, NASDAQ:GOOGL), General Motors (NYSE:GM), Velodyne (NASDAQ:VLDR), Embark (NASDAQ:EMBK) and Aurora Innovation (NASDAQ:AUR), are making a great deal of progress when it comes to commercializing self-driving technology on a significant scale.</p><p>Meanwhile, fears of the coronavirus have dropped tremendously, and the Biden administration seems to have decided recently to quickly facilitate the proliferation of autonomous vehicles.</p><p>For evidence of the latter trend, consider the fact that the  U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration recently decided to allow “fully autonomous vehicles” to be built without certain safety features previously required in all vehicles, such as steering wheels. Moreover, U.S. Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg said earlier this month that his department does not want to prevent innovation in the autonomous vehicle space. He also predicted that regulation of the sector would evolve a great deal during the rest of the 2020’s.</p><p>And at the beginning of March, Intel (NASDQ:INTC) filed papers with the Securities and Exchange Commission to launch an IPO of its Mobileye unit, which develops and sells self-driving and advanced driving assistance systems. If Mobileye’s shares attain a high valuation, they could provide a positive catalyst to other companies in the sector.</p><p>Finally, since self-driving automobiles would save both businesses and consumers a great deal of time and money, I continue to believe that the technology will prove to be quite lucrative for the firms that successfully introduce it widely.</p><p>As such, I think that the best ways for investors to benefit from the ultimate proliferation of self-driving vehicles is by buying the following autonomous driving stocks:</p><ul><li>Aurora Innovation (AUR)</li><li>Embark (EMBK)</li><li>Velodyne (VLDR)</li></ul><h2>Autonomous Vehicle Stocks to Buy: Aurora Innovation (AUR)</h2><p>Encouragingly, way back in 2019, Amazon (NASDAQ:AMZN) invested in Aurora. In the process, it somewhat validated the company’s technology. It also helped make me more confident that Hyundai (OTCMKTS:HYMTF) also invested in the company in 2019.</p><p>Recently, Aurora announced that it had developed self-driving technology that is able to “work across multiple vehicle types.” That level of standardization should greatly facilitate the use of Aurora’s system by transportation companies and automakers.</p><p>Also increasing my confidence in AUR stock is the fact that the tech startup is partnering with “Volvo on autonomous trucks and Toyota to develop a fleet of self-driving Siennas,” according to Cnet.</p><p>The current market capitalization of AUR stock is $6 billion. That’s not low, but I believe that it greatly undervalues the company’s long-term potential.</p><h2>Embark (EMBK)</h2><p>The company sells self-driving software for trucks called Embark Driver. It charges trucking companies a per-mile subscription fee for the use of the software.</p><p>According to the company’s CEO, Alex Rodrigues, Embark uses technology that enables “trucks to update … maps in real time, which is critical when encountering situations like construction work zones, particularly when you’re on a two-lane highway and there are no alternative routes.” Moreover, the company’s system can be easily “integrated” with trucks made by any major manufacturer, and “some of the top carriers in the United States … [are its] customers.” For October, the company said that it had received “14,200 reservations for Embark-equipped autonomous trucks, more than twice the nearest public competitor” at that point.</p><p>Rodrigues noted that, in the U.S., human truck drivers cannot drive their vehicles for more than 11 hours each day. And that Embark’s software can dramatically expand that number.</p><p>Finally, the CEO reported that “over 1 million real world miles” had been driven using the company’s software “without a single department of Transportation reportable safety incident.”</p><p>Stephen Houghton, who was named the company’s COO in February, worked on autonomous vehicles for Amazon and Cruise (currently owned by GM) for six years.</p><h2>Autonomous Vehicle Stocks to Buy: Velodyne (VLDR)</h2><p>In a very positive development, Velodyne announced last month that Amazon had purchased a warrant that could enable the e-commerce giant to buy nearly 40 million shares of VLDR stock. The warrant will become exercisable “based on discretionary payments made by Amazon pursuant to existing commercial agreements between Velodyne and Amazon,” Seeking Alpha explained. I think the deal suggests that Amazon believes that Velodyne has a great deal of potential.</p><p>Also note that in 2017, Amazon obtained a warrant to buy up to 55.3 million shares of Plug Power (NASDAQ:PLUG) stock. PLUG stock finished 2017 at $1.93. On March 18, 2022, it closed at $26.15.</p><p>In 2021, Velodyne’s shipments of sensors jumped 35% versus 2020 to slightly over 15,000. In 2019, the company shipped just over 12,000 sensors. Last quarter, it sold a record 4,900 sensors. The company’s revenue dropped 1.7% year-over-year because of its strategy of using lower prices to gain market share. Ultimately, however, I expect that approach will be quite successful.</p><p>VLDR stock is trading at a reasonable trailing price-sales ratio of 7.67x, according to Yahoo Finance.</p></body></html>","source":"lsy1606302653667","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>3 Autonomous Vehicle Stocks to Buy Ahead of the Mobileye IPO</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n3 Autonomous Vehicle Stocks to Buy Ahead of the Mobileye IPO\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-03-26 07:44 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://investorplace.com/2022/03/3-autonomous-vehicle-stocks-to-buy-ahead-of-the-mobileye-ipo/><strong>investorplace</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Restrictions due to the coronavirus and regulatory issues have slowed the progress of autonomous vehicles more than I thought they would. However, I still believe that long-term investors will ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://investorplace.com/2022/03/3-autonomous-vehicle-stocks-to-buy-ahead-of-the-mobileye-ipo/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"EMBK":"Embark Technology, Inc","VLDR":"威力登激光雷达","AUR":"Aurora Innovation"},"source_url":"https://investorplace.com/2022/03/3-autonomous-vehicle-stocks-to-buy-ahead-of-the-mobileye-ipo/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1153047568","content_text":"Restrictions due to the coronavirus and regulatory issues have slowed the progress of autonomous vehicles more than I thought they would. However, I still believe that long-term investors will ultimately benefit a great deal from buying autonomous driving stocks. Many companies, including Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG, NASDAQ:GOOGL), General Motors (NYSE:GM), Velodyne (NASDAQ:VLDR), Embark (NASDAQ:EMBK) and Aurora Innovation (NASDAQ:AUR), are making a great deal of progress when it comes to commercializing self-driving technology on a significant scale.Meanwhile, fears of the coronavirus have dropped tremendously, and the Biden administration seems to have decided recently to quickly facilitate the proliferation of autonomous vehicles.For evidence of the latter trend, consider the fact that the  U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration recently decided to allow “fully autonomous vehicles” to be built without certain safety features previously required in all vehicles, such as steering wheels. Moreover, U.S. Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg said earlier this month that his department does not want to prevent innovation in the autonomous vehicle space. He also predicted that regulation of the sector would evolve a great deal during the rest of the 2020’s.And at the beginning of March, Intel (NASDQ:INTC) filed papers with the Securities and Exchange Commission to launch an IPO of its Mobileye unit, which develops and sells self-driving and advanced driving assistance systems. If Mobileye’s shares attain a high valuation, they could provide a positive catalyst to other companies in the sector.Finally, since self-driving automobiles would save both businesses and consumers a great deal of time and money, I continue to believe that the technology will prove to be quite lucrative for the firms that successfully introduce it widely.As such, I think that the best ways for investors to benefit from the ultimate proliferation of self-driving vehicles is by buying the following autonomous driving stocks:Aurora Innovation (AUR)Embark (EMBK)Velodyne (VLDR)Autonomous Vehicle Stocks to Buy: Aurora Innovation (AUR)Encouragingly, way back in 2019, Amazon (NASDAQ:AMZN) invested in Aurora. In the process, it somewhat validated the company’s technology. It also helped make me more confident that Hyundai (OTCMKTS:HYMTF) also invested in the company in 2019.Recently, Aurora announced that it had developed self-driving technology that is able to “work across multiple vehicle types.” That level of standardization should greatly facilitate the use of Aurora’s system by transportation companies and automakers.Also increasing my confidence in AUR stock is the fact that the tech startup is partnering with “Volvo on autonomous trucks and Toyota to develop a fleet of self-driving Siennas,” according to Cnet.The current market capitalization of AUR stock is $6 billion. That’s not low, but I believe that it greatly undervalues the company’s long-term potential.Embark (EMBK)The company sells self-driving software for trucks called Embark Driver. It charges trucking companies a per-mile subscription fee for the use of the software.According to the company’s CEO, Alex Rodrigues, Embark uses technology that enables “trucks to update … maps in real time, which is critical when encountering situations like construction work zones, particularly when you’re on a two-lane highway and there are no alternative routes.” Moreover, the company’s system can be easily “integrated” with trucks made by any major manufacturer, and “some of the top carriers in the United States … [are its] customers.” For October, the company said that it had received “14,200 reservations for Embark-equipped autonomous trucks, more than twice the nearest public competitor” at that point.Rodrigues noted that, in the U.S., human truck drivers cannot drive their vehicles for more than 11 hours each day. And that Embark’s software can dramatically expand that number.Finally, the CEO reported that “over 1 million real world miles” had been driven using the company’s software “without a single department of Transportation reportable safety incident.”Stephen Houghton, who was named the company’s COO in February, worked on autonomous vehicles for Amazon and Cruise (currently owned by GM) for six years.Autonomous Vehicle Stocks to Buy: Velodyne (VLDR)In a very positive development, Velodyne announced last month that Amazon had purchased a warrant that could enable the e-commerce giant to buy nearly 40 million shares of VLDR stock. The warrant will become exercisable “based on discretionary payments made by Amazon pursuant to existing commercial agreements between Velodyne and Amazon,” Seeking Alpha explained. I think the deal suggests that Amazon believes that Velodyne has a great deal of potential.Also note that in 2017, Amazon obtained a warrant to buy up to 55.3 million shares of Plug Power (NASDAQ:PLUG) stock. PLUG stock finished 2017 at $1.93. On March 18, 2022, it closed at $26.15.In 2021, Velodyne’s shipments of sensors jumped 35% versus 2020 to slightly over 15,000. In 2019, the company shipped just over 12,000 sensors. Last quarter, it sold a record 4,900 sensors. The company’s revenue dropped 1.7% year-over-year because of its strategy of using lower prices to gain market share. Ultimately, however, I expect that approach will be quite successful.VLDR stock is trading at a reasonable trailing price-sales ratio of 7.67x, according to Yahoo Finance.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":287,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9010843876,"gmtCreate":1648345328114,"gmtModify":1676534329280,"author":{"id":"3568542354994015","authorId":"3568542354994015","name":"咩咩虎","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a6663bef57eca539a2c52ea184964654","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9010843876","repostId":"1191611475","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1191611475","pubTimestamp":1648341534,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1191611475?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-03-27 08:38","market":"us","language":"en","title":"SoFi Stock Bulls Can Rejoice as a Great Catalyst Is Coming Up","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1191611475","media":"investorplace","summary":"SoFi’s (NASDAQ:SOFI) stock has been declining, and it’s not surprising. Investing in fintech stocks ","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>SoFi’s (NASDAQ:SOFI) stock has been declining, and it’s not surprising. Investing in fintech stocks during this time is often considered a tough decision. The tensions between Russia and Ukraine are heating up.</p><p>The Federal Reserve is looking to reign in inflation through interest rate hikes on the domestic front. However, considering the positive catalysts on the horizon now is not the time to part ways with SoFi stock.</p><p>The financial industry is changing rapidly, and the pace of innovation is increasing. Banks are increasingly using APIs to power their business. They are also looking for new ways to compete with fintech, which offers various products and services.</p><p>SoFi is a successful example of a company that has transformed the banking industry by offering customers a “one-stop-shop” financial services platform that includes personal loans, mortgages, savings accounts, and wealth management products. SoFi’s success can be attributed to its innovative business model and focus on customer experience.</p><p>One of the biggest pieces of news coming from SoFi was its fourth-quarter earnings report and its recent approval for a bank charter. Both of the announcements were positive catalysts for the stock. This is great news for existing SoFi customers and investors looking to invest in the company.</p><p>But shares of the company are still trading at cheap multiples versus their 52-week high. That is why many risk-tolerant investors are drooling at the prospect of investing in this one.</p><h2>Student Debt Refinancing Volume Returning</h2><p>Despite the negative market sentiment, SoFi is not making any wrong moves. The overall market machinations are having an impact on every tech stock out there.</p><p>Management took several steps to help the company deal with the pandemic, and they have done a great job meeting these challenges. Despite seeing its student loan origination volume drop drastically, the company managed to do well because of a three-business segment operating model. The CARES Act led to lower student loan origination after the virus. The legislation kept a freeze in effect during the pandemic. After that, there have been several extensions, and the latest one ends on May 1.</p><p>Lawmakers could push for extensions. However, the pandemic has receded, and things are getting back to normal. Therefore, it is likely that this is the last extension. If that is the case, then the student loan business can return and drive returns in the second half of the year. That is a major catalyst that the company can look forward towards.</p><h2>Diversifying the Revenue Mix</h2><p>Interestingly, Covid-19 allowed the company to reassess its product portfolio. In doing so, it managed to power its portfolio with new products. Its Galileo and Financial Services segments proved money-spinners in this regard, and you can make a case that they can outperform the Lending segment in the long run.</p><p>Galileo is a payment platform that provides customers with an API. The platform allows merchants to create their own branded payment cards, which customers can use to make payments.</p><p>Galileo offers a solution for businesses and consumers who want to avoid the high transaction fees associated with credit and debit card transactions.</p><p>Technology Platform segment net revenue for the fourth quarter of 2021 was $53.3 million, which is up 42% from the comparable prior-year period. For the full year of 2021, segment net revenue was $194.9 million, representing year-on-year growth of 102%.</p><p>Meanwhile, the company’s financial services segment includes SoFi Invest, Money, Credit Card, and Lantern by SoFi.</p><p>The fourth-quarter revenue for this division was $22 million, which was more than five times the total revenue from 2020. This is a significant accomplishment made while building out this segment.</p><p>In addition, the company is nearing the closure of its purchase of Technisys in an all-stock deal worth $1.1 billion. This deal will allow the company to grow its user base in Latin America and also improve services in terms of personalized offerings. In addition, the agreement is expected to reduce operating expenses by $75 million to $85 million between 2023 and 2025. As my colleague, Vandita Jadeja said, the purchase is another step toward becoming a one-stop-shop for all financial services.</p><h2>The Bottom Line</h2><p>Due to the bearish market sentiment, investors are avoiding fintech stocks. However, it’s important to judge every company on its merits. The broader market issues will impact the price. Ultimately, though, the markets will reward a strong operating model.</p><p>SoFi has all the advantages to succeed in the future. They can offer lower interest rates and flexible repayment plans, making their services more attractive than other lenders. Plus, as the end of a federal moratorium nears, it has an additional catalyst that will power its returns through the year.</p></body></html>","source":"lsy1606302653667","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>SoFi Stock Bulls Can Rejoice as a Great Catalyst Is Coming Up</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSoFi Stock Bulls Can Rejoice as a Great Catalyst Is Coming Up\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-03-27 08:38 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://investorplace.com/2022/03/sofi-stock-bulls-can-rejoice-as-a-great-catalyst-is-coming-up/><strong>investorplace</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>SoFi’s (NASDAQ:SOFI) stock has been declining, and it’s not surprising. Investing in fintech stocks during this time is often considered a tough decision. The tensions between Russia and Ukraine are ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://investorplace.com/2022/03/sofi-stock-bulls-can-rejoice-as-a-great-catalyst-is-coming-up/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SOFI":"SoFi Technologies Inc."},"source_url":"https://investorplace.com/2022/03/sofi-stock-bulls-can-rejoice-as-a-great-catalyst-is-coming-up/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1191611475","content_text":"SoFi’s (NASDAQ:SOFI) stock has been declining, and it’s not surprising. Investing in fintech stocks during this time is often considered a tough decision. The tensions between Russia and Ukraine are heating up.The Federal Reserve is looking to reign in inflation through interest rate hikes on the domestic front. However, considering the positive catalysts on the horizon now is not the time to part ways with SoFi stock.The financial industry is changing rapidly, and the pace of innovation is increasing. Banks are increasingly using APIs to power their business. They are also looking for new ways to compete with fintech, which offers various products and services.SoFi is a successful example of a company that has transformed the banking industry by offering customers a “one-stop-shop” financial services platform that includes personal loans, mortgages, savings accounts, and wealth management products. SoFi’s success can be attributed to its innovative business model and focus on customer experience.One of the biggest pieces of news coming from SoFi was its fourth-quarter earnings report and its recent approval for a bank charter. Both of the announcements were positive catalysts for the stock. This is great news for existing SoFi customers and investors looking to invest in the company.But shares of the company are still trading at cheap multiples versus their 52-week high. That is why many risk-tolerant investors are drooling at the prospect of investing in this one.Student Debt Refinancing Volume ReturningDespite the negative market sentiment, SoFi is not making any wrong moves. The overall market machinations are having an impact on every tech stock out there.Management took several steps to help the company deal with the pandemic, and they have done a great job meeting these challenges. Despite seeing its student loan origination volume drop drastically, the company managed to do well because of a three-business segment operating model. The CARES Act led to lower student loan origination after the virus. The legislation kept a freeze in effect during the pandemic. After that, there have been several extensions, and the latest one ends on May 1.Lawmakers could push for extensions. However, the pandemic has receded, and things are getting back to normal. Therefore, it is likely that this is the last extension. If that is the case, then the student loan business can return and drive returns in the second half of the year. That is a major catalyst that the company can look forward towards.Diversifying the Revenue MixInterestingly, Covid-19 allowed the company to reassess its product portfolio. In doing so, it managed to power its portfolio with new products. Its Galileo and Financial Services segments proved money-spinners in this regard, and you can make a case that they can outperform the Lending segment in the long run.Galileo is a payment platform that provides customers with an API. The platform allows merchants to create their own branded payment cards, which customers can use to make payments.Galileo offers a solution for businesses and consumers who want to avoid the high transaction fees associated with credit and debit card transactions.Technology Platform segment net revenue for the fourth quarter of 2021 was $53.3 million, which is up 42% from the comparable prior-year period. For the full year of 2021, segment net revenue was $194.9 million, representing year-on-year growth of 102%.Meanwhile, the company’s financial services segment includes SoFi Invest, Money, Credit Card, and Lantern by SoFi.The fourth-quarter revenue for this division was $22 million, which was more than five times the total revenue from 2020. This is a significant accomplishment made while building out this segment.In addition, the company is nearing the closure of its purchase of Technisys in an all-stock deal worth $1.1 billion. This deal will allow the company to grow its user base in Latin America and also improve services in terms of personalized offerings. In addition, the agreement is expected to reduce operating expenses by $75 million to $85 million between 2023 and 2025. As my colleague, Vandita Jadeja said, the purchase is another step toward becoming a one-stop-shop for all financial services.The Bottom LineDue to the bearish market sentiment, investors are avoiding fintech stocks. However, it’s important to judge every company on its merits. The broader market issues will impact the price. Ultimately, though, the markets will reward a strong operating model.SoFi has all the advantages to succeed in the future. They can offer lower interest rates and flexible repayment plans, making their services more attractive than other lenders. Plus, as the end of a federal moratorium nears, it has an additional catalyst that will power its returns through the year.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":151,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9010117992,"gmtCreate":1648284089368,"gmtModify":1676534325469,"author":{"id":"3568542354994015","authorId":"3568542354994015","name":"咩咩虎","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a6663bef57eca539a2c52ea184964654","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9010117992","repostId":"2222052834","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2222052834","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1648249343,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2222052834?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-03-26 07:02","market":"us","language":"en","title":"US STOCKS-S&P 500 Ends Higher with Financials as Treasury Yields Jump","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2222052834","media":"Reuters","summary":"* Financials rise with 10-yr yield* Tech shares down, weighing on Nasdaq* Utilities sector hits reco","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>* Financials rise with 10-yr yield</p><p>* Tech shares down, weighing on Nasdaq</p><p>* Utilities sector hits record high</p><p>* Indexes: Dow up 0.4%, S&amp;P 500 up 0.5%, Nasdaq down 0.2%</p><p>* For the week, Dow up 0.3%, S&amp;P 500 up 1.8%, Nasdaq up 2%</p><p>NEW YORK, March 25 (Reuters) - The S&amp;P 500 ended higher on Friday as financial shares rose after the benchmark Treasury yield jumped to its highest level in nearly three years.</p><p>The Nasdaq ended lower, and tech and other big growth names mostly declined, but they finished off session lows following a late-session rally.</p><p>For the week, the Nasdaq and S&amp;P 500 registered solid gains of 2% and 1.8%, respectively, and the Dow was nominally higher with a 0.3% rise.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 financials sector gave the S&amp;P 500 its biggest boost on Friday, rising 1.3%, while technology and consumer discretionary sectors were the only two major sectors to end lower on the day.</p><p>Investors are assessing how aggressive the Federal Reserve will be as it tightens policy after Fed Chair Jerome Powell this week said that the central bank needed to move &#34;expeditiously&#34; to combat high inflation and raised the possibility of a 50-basis-point hike in rates in May.</p><p>U.S. Treasury yields jumped on Friday, with the benchmark 10-year note surging to nearly three-year highs, as the market grappled with high inflation and a Federal Reserve that could easily spark a downturn as it aggressively tightens policy.</p><p>Ten-year Treasury yields were last at 2.492% after earlier rising above 2.50% for the first time since May 2019.</p><p>The equity market is pricing in a higher rate environment, said Keith Buchanan, portfolio manager at Globalt Investments in Atlanta.</p><p>That is causing bank stocks to outperform, while &#34;adding more pressure to the riskier elements of the market,&#34; such as growth shares, he said.</p><p>Higher borrowing rates benefit banks, while higher rates are a negative for tech and growth stocks, whose valuations rely more heavily on future cash flows.</p><p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 153.3 points, or 0.44%, to 34,861.24, the S&amp;P 500    gained 22.9 points, or 0.51%, to 4,543.06 and the Nasdaq Composite dropped 22.54 points, or 0.16%, to 14,169.30.</p><p>Shares of growth companies like Nvidia Corp eased after leading a Wall Street rebound earlier this week.</p><p>The utilities sector also rose sharply, hitting a record high as investors favored defensive stocks with the Russia-Ukraine war still raging after a month.</p><p>The sector ended up 1.5% on the day and up 3.5% for the week, while the energy sector ended up 2.3% on the day and jumped more than 7% for the week following sharp gains in oil prices.</p><p>Moscow signaled on Friday it was scaling back its ambitions in Ukraine to focus on territory claimed by Russian-backed separatists.</p><p>Economists at Citibank are expecting four 50 basis points interest rate hikes from the Fed this year, joining other Wall Street banks in forecasting an aggressive tightening path against the backdrop of soaring inflation.</p><p>The U.S. central bank last week raised interest rates for the first time since 2018.</p><p>&#34;The market&#39;s really macro driven,&#34; said Steve DeSanctis, small- and mid-capitalization equity strategist at Jefferies in New York. &#34;Company fundamentals haven&#39;t really mattered.&#34;</p><p>Volume on U.S. exchanges was 11.92 billion shares, compared with the 14.28 billion average for the full session over the last 20 trading days.</p><p>Advancing issues outnumbered declining ones on the NYSE by a 1.08-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 1.40-to-1 ratio favored decliners.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 posted 57 new 52-week highs and five new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 73 new highs and 79 new lows.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>US STOCKS-S&P 500 Ends Higher with Financials as Treasury Yields Jump</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nUS STOCKS-S&P 500 Ends Higher with Financials as Treasury Yields Jump\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-03-26 07:02</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>* Financials rise with 10-yr yield</p><p>* Tech shares down, weighing on Nasdaq</p><p>* Utilities sector hits record high</p><p>* Indexes: Dow up 0.4%, S&amp;P 500 up 0.5%, Nasdaq down 0.2%</p><p>* For the week, Dow up 0.3%, S&amp;P 500 up 1.8%, Nasdaq up 2%</p><p>NEW YORK, March 25 (Reuters) - The S&amp;P 500 ended higher on Friday as financial shares rose after the benchmark Treasury yield jumped to its highest level in nearly three years.</p><p>The Nasdaq ended lower, and tech and other big growth names mostly declined, but they finished off session lows following a late-session rally.</p><p>For the week, the Nasdaq and S&amp;P 500 registered solid gains of 2% and 1.8%, respectively, and the Dow was nominally higher with a 0.3% rise.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 financials sector gave the S&amp;P 500 its biggest boost on Friday, rising 1.3%, while technology and consumer discretionary sectors were the only two major sectors to end lower on the day.</p><p>Investors are assessing how aggressive the Federal Reserve will be as it tightens policy after Fed Chair Jerome Powell this week said that the central bank needed to move &#34;expeditiously&#34; to combat high inflation and raised the possibility of a 50-basis-point hike in rates in May.</p><p>U.S. Treasury yields jumped on Friday, with the benchmark 10-year note surging to nearly three-year highs, as the market grappled with high inflation and a Federal Reserve that could easily spark a downturn as it aggressively tightens policy.</p><p>Ten-year Treasury yields were last at 2.492% after earlier rising above 2.50% for the first time since May 2019.</p><p>The equity market is pricing in a higher rate environment, said Keith Buchanan, portfolio manager at Globalt Investments in Atlanta.</p><p>That is causing bank stocks to outperform, while &#34;adding more pressure to the riskier elements of the market,&#34; such as growth shares, he said.</p><p>Higher borrowing rates benefit banks, while higher rates are a negative for tech and growth stocks, whose valuations rely more heavily on future cash flows.</p><p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 153.3 points, or 0.44%, to 34,861.24, the S&amp;P 500    gained 22.9 points, or 0.51%, to 4,543.06 and the Nasdaq Composite dropped 22.54 points, or 0.16%, to 14,169.30.</p><p>Shares of growth companies like Nvidia Corp eased after leading a Wall Street rebound earlier this week.</p><p>The utilities sector also rose sharply, hitting a record high as investors favored defensive stocks with the Russia-Ukraine war still raging after a month.</p><p>The sector ended up 1.5% on the day and up 3.5% for the week, while the energy sector ended up 2.3% on the day and jumped more than 7% for the week following sharp gains in oil prices.</p><p>Moscow signaled on Friday it was scaling back its ambitions in Ukraine to focus on territory claimed by Russian-backed separatists.</p><p>Economists at Citibank are expecting four 50 basis points interest rate hikes from the Fed this year, joining other Wall Street banks in forecasting an aggressive tightening path against the backdrop of soaring inflation.</p><p>The U.S. central bank last week raised interest rates for the first time since 2018.</p><p>&#34;The market&#39;s really macro driven,&#34; said Steve DeSanctis, small- and mid-capitalization equity strategist at Jefferies in New York. &#34;Company fundamentals haven&#39;t really mattered.&#34;</p><p>Volume on U.S. exchanges was 11.92 billion shares, compared with the 14.28 billion average for the full session over the last 20 trading days.</p><p>Advancing issues outnumbered declining ones on the NYSE by a 1.08-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 1.40-to-1 ratio favored decliners.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 posted 57 new 52-week highs and five new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 73 new highs and 79 new lows.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"161125":"标普500","513500":"标普500ETF","SH":"标普500反向ETF","SPXU":"三倍做空标普500ETF","BK4559":"巴菲特持仓","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓","UPRO":"三倍做多标普500ETF","SPY":"标普500ETF","BK4581":"高盛持仓","BK4504":"桥水持仓","OEF":"标普100指数ETF-iShares",".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite","SSO":"两倍做多标普500ETF","SDS":"两倍做空标普500ETF","OEX":"标普100",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","IVV":"标普500指数ETF"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2222052834","content_text":"* Financials rise with 10-yr yield* Tech shares down, weighing on Nasdaq* Utilities sector hits record high* Indexes: Dow up 0.4%, S&P 500 up 0.5%, Nasdaq down 0.2%* For the week, Dow up 0.3%, S&P 500 up 1.8%, Nasdaq up 2%NEW YORK, March 25 (Reuters) - The S&P 500 ended higher on Friday as financial shares rose after the benchmark Treasury yield jumped to its highest level in nearly three years.The Nasdaq ended lower, and tech and other big growth names mostly declined, but they finished off session lows following a late-session rally.For the week, the Nasdaq and S&P 500 registered solid gains of 2% and 1.8%, respectively, and the Dow was nominally higher with a 0.3% rise.The S&P 500 financials sector gave the S&P 500 its biggest boost on Friday, rising 1.3%, while technology and consumer discretionary sectors were the only two major sectors to end lower on the day.Investors are assessing how aggressive the Federal Reserve will be as it tightens policy after Fed Chair Jerome Powell this week said that the central bank needed to move \"expeditiously\" to combat high inflation and raised the possibility of a 50-basis-point hike in rates in May.U.S. Treasury yields jumped on Friday, with the benchmark 10-year note surging to nearly three-year highs, as the market grappled with high inflation and a Federal Reserve that could easily spark a downturn as it aggressively tightens policy.Ten-year Treasury yields were last at 2.492% after earlier rising above 2.50% for the first time since May 2019.The equity market is pricing in a higher rate environment, said Keith Buchanan, portfolio manager at Globalt Investments in Atlanta.That is causing bank stocks to outperform, while \"adding more pressure to the riskier elements of the market,\" such as growth shares, he said.Higher borrowing rates benefit banks, while higher rates are a negative for tech and growth stocks, whose valuations rely more heavily on future cash flows.The Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 153.3 points, or 0.44%, to 34,861.24, the S&P 500    gained 22.9 points, or 0.51%, to 4,543.06 and the Nasdaq Composite dropped 22.54 points, or 0.16%, to 14,169.30.Shares of growth companies like Nvidia Corp eased after leading a Wall Street rebound earlier this week.The utilities sector also rose sharply, hitting a record high as investors favored defensive stocks with the Russia-Ukraine war still raging after a month.The sector ended up 1.5% on the day and up 3.5% for the week, while the energy sector ended up 2.3% on the day and jumped more than 7% for the week following sharp gains in oil prices.Moscow signaled on Friday it was scaling back its ambitions in Ukraine to focus on territory claimed by Russian-backed separatists.Economists at Citibank are expecting four 50 basis points interest rate hikes from the Fed this year, joining other Wall Street banks in forecasting an aggressive tightening path against the backdrop of soaring inflation.The U.S. central bank last week raised interest rates for the first time since 2018.\"The market's really macro driven,\" said Steve DeSanctis, small- and mid-capitalization equity strategist at Jefferies in New York. \"Company fundamentals haven't really mattered.\"Volume on U.S. exchanges was 11.92 billion shares, compared with the 14.28 billion average for the full session over the last 20 trading days.Advancing issues outnumbered declining ones on the NYSE by a 1.08-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 1.40-to-1 ratio favored decliners.The S&P 500 posted 57 new 52-week highs and five new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 73 new highs and 79 new lows.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":169,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9037418441,"gmtCreate":1648165430436,"gmtModify":1676534311313,"author":{"id":"3568542354994015","authorId":"3568542354994015","name":"咩咩虎","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a6663bef57eca539a2c52ea184964654","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9037418441","repostId":"2221907525","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2221907525","pubTimestamp":1648162407,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2221907525?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-03-25 06:53","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Uber Stock Soars 5% on Deal to List All New York Taxis on App","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2221907525","media":"StreetInsider","summary":"Shares of Uber Technologies are up more than 5% after the company has reached a deal to list all New","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Shares of <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/UBER\">Uber Technologies</a> are up more than 5% after the company has reached a deal to list all New York taxis on its app.</p><p>Uber has reached an agreement to list all New York City taxis on its application, a landmark deal for the transport giant as it continues to grapple with the driver shortage and high fares.</p><p>The deal marks the first Uber’s citywide partnership in the U.S. in a city that represents one of the company’s most profitable markets. The ride-hailing company already has partnerships with taxi operators around the world but securing New York City’s famous yellow taxis is “bigger and bolder than anything” the company has done so far, said Andrew Macdonald, global mobility chief of Uber.</p><p>Taxi technology system provider Creative Mobile Technologies (CMT) confirmed the deal after the WSJ broke the story.</p><p>“New York City is back!,&#34; said Ron Sherman, Chairman of CMT.</p><p>&#34;As businesses bring their employees back, as tourists flock to New York City again and as New Yorkers start going out and replenishing our local economy after a devastating pandemic, yellow taxis and Uber are bringing the best our industries have to offer to help this city get back on its feet.&#34;</p><p>The deal will see New York City Taxi and Limousine Commission’s licensed technology partners integrate their taxi apps with the Uber app. The taxi-hailing apps are used by approximately 14,000 taxis in NYC, Uber claims.</p><p>The ride-sharing company expects to roll out the new feature this spring.</p></body></html>","source":"highlight_streetinsider","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Uber Stock Soars 5% on Deal to List All New York Taxis on App</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nUber Stock Soars 5% on Deal to List All New York Taxis on App\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-03-25 06:53 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.streetinsider.com/dr/news.php?id=19818065><strong>StreetInsider</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Shares of Uber Technologies are up more than 5% after the company has reached a deal to list all New York taxis on its app.Uber has reached an agreement to list all New York City taxis on its ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.streetinsider.com/dr/news.php?id=19818065\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BK4503":"景林资产持仓","BK4536":"外卖概念","BK4551":"寇图资本持仓","BK4022":"陆运","BK4535":"淡马锡持仓","BK4505":"高瓴资本持仓","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓"},"source_url":"https://www.streetinsider.com/dr/news.php?id=19818065","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2221907525","content_text":"Shares of Uber Technologies are up more than 5% after the company has reached a deal to list all New York taxis on its app.Uber has reached an agreement to list all New York City taxis on its application, a landmark deal for the transport giant as it continues to grapple with the driver shortage and high fares.The deal marks the first Uber’s citywide partnership in the U.S. in a city that represents one of the company’s most profitable markets. The ride-hailing company already has partnerships with taxi operators around the world but securing New York City’s famous yellow taxis is “bigger and bolder than anything” the company has done so far, said Andrew Macdonald, global mobility chief of Uber.Taxi technology system provider Creative Mobile Technologies (CMT) confirmed the deal after the WSJ broke the story.“New York City is back!,\" said Ron Sherman, Chairman of CMT.\"As businesses bring their employees back, as tourists flock to New York City again and as New Yorkers start going out and replenishing our local economy after a devastating pandemic, yellow taxis and Uber are bringing the best our industries have to offer to help this city get back on its feet.\"The deal will see New York City Taxi and Limousine Commission’s licensed technology partners integrate their taxi apps with the Uber app. The taxi-hailing apps are used by approximately 14,000 taxis in NYC, Uber claims.The ride-sharing company expects to roll out the new feature this spring.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":138,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9037338754,"gmtCreate":1648024929307,"gmtModify":1676534294202,"author":{"id":"3568542354994015","authorId":"3568542354994015","name":"咩咩虎","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a6663bef57eca539a2c52ea184964654","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9037338754","repostId":"2221037062","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2221037062","pubTimestamp":1648049400,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2221037062?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-03-23 23:30","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Cathie Wood Goes Bargain Hunting: 3 Stocks She Just Bought","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2221037062","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"There are always stocks to buy if you're Ark Invest's ace stock picker.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Cathie Wood did an interesting thing last week as stocks were rallying. The CEO, co-founder, and ace stock picker for the Ark Invest family of exchange-traded funds (<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PSFF\">Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF|ETF</a>s) stood pat on her buying urges. She lightened a few positions last week, but she failed to execute a buy order in any of the final three trading days of last week.</p><p>The streak ended on Monday. <b>Shopify</b>, <b>Twilio</b>, and <b>Adaptive Biotechnologies</b> are the three stocks that Ark Invest bought. What does Wood see in these three fast-growing companies? Let&#39;s take a closer look.</p><h2>Shopify</h2><p>It&#39;s been a rough few months for Shopify investors. The fast-growing e-commerce specialist has seen its stock plunge more than 60% since peaking in November. Shopify stock came back to life with last week&#39;s market rally in growth stocks, but a 12% slide on Monday to kick off this new trading week shows that shareholders are still looking to take profits following sharp upticks.</p><p>Revenue growth is slowing at Shopify. Its top line surged 86% in 2020, slowing to a 57% pace in 2021. Growth has decelerated sharply the last three quarters. Shopify itself was vague about its guidance, but analysts are holding out for a 31% increase in 2022. Shopify continues to stand out for its ability to arm merchants of all sizes with the tools to establish an online presence that plays nice with most popular e-commerce and social media platforms.</p><h2>Twilio</h2><p>There is a lot to like about Twilio, the undisputed leader of in-app communication solutions. Twilio&#39;s cloud-based tools help many of the most popular apps be more effective by providing two-way communication with users -- for everything from service notifications to verification -- without having to leave an app.</p><p>It&#39;s growing briskly. Revenue rose 61% in 2021, including a 54% year-over-year uptick for its latest quarter. Acquisitions have helped pad Twilio&#39;s growth over the years. Organic revenue rose a more modest 44% clip last year if you back out the bump in political election season revenue from late 2020, but the appeal of the platform remains strong. Retention rates are still healthy, and Twilio continues to successfully expand its offerings.</p><h2>Adaptive Biotechnologies</h2><p>It&#39;s been a rough year for Adaptive Biotechnologies. Its CFO resigned in January, and earlier this month the biotech upstart announced that it would be laying off 12% of its staff. The reorganization is part of Adaptive narrowing the focus of its immune system genetic sequencing technology to key in on minimal residual disease and immune medicine.</p><p>The stock has been cut by more than half so far in 2022, and it&#39;s down 82% since peaking 14 months ago. The technology is promising, and Adaptive Biotechnologies is <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> of the stocks that Wood was buying earlier last week before she took a three-day break from purchases. Analysts don&#39;t see the company turning a profit for several more years, but that&#39;s not necessarily a deal breaker for biotech stocks as long as they have the liquidity in place to hold out for a medical breakthrough.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Cathie Wood Goes Bargain Hunting: 3 Stocks She Just Bought</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nCathie Wood Goes Bargain Hunting: 3 Stocks She Just Bought\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-03-23 23:30 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/03/22/cathie-wood-goes-bargain-hunting-3-stocks-she-just/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Cathie Wood did an interesting thing last week as stocks were rallying. The CEO, co-founder, and ace stock picker for the Ark Invest family of exchange-traded funds (Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF|...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/03/22/cathie-wood-goes-bargain-hunting-3-stocks-she-just/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"ADPT":"Adaptive Biotechnologies Corp","TWLO":"Twilio Inc","SHOP":"Shopify Inc"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/03/22/cathie-wood-goes-bargain-hunting-3-stocks-she-just/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2221037062","content_text":"Cathie Wood did an interesting thing last week as stocks were rallying. The CEO, co-founder, and ace stock picker for the Ark Invest family of exchange-traded funds (Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF|ETFs) stood pat on her buying urges. She lightened a few positions last week, but she failed to execute a buy order in any of the final three trading days of last week.The streak ended on Monday. Shopify, Twilio, and Adaptive Biotechnologies are the three stocks that Ark Invest bought. What does Wood see in these three fast-growing companies? Let's take a closer look.ShopifyIt's been a rough few months for Shopify investors. The fast-growing e-commerce specialist has seen its stock plunge more than 60% since peaking in November. Shopify stock came back to life with last week's market rally in growth stocks, but a 12% slide on Monday to kick off this new trading week shows that shareholders are still looking to take profits following sharp upticks.Revenue growth is slowing at Shopify. Its top line surged 86% in 2020, slowing to a 57% pace in 2021. Growth has decelerated sharply the last three quarters. Shopify itself was vague about its guidance, but analysts are holding out for a 31% increase in 2022. Shopify continues to stand out for its ability to arm merchants of all sizes with the tools to establish an online presence that plays nice with most popular e-commerce and social media platforms.TwilioThere is a lot to like about Twilio, the undisputed leader of in-app communication solutions. Twilio's cloud-based tools help many of the most popular apps be more effective by providing two-way communication with users -- for everything from service notifications to verification -- without having to leave an app.It's growing briskly. Revenue rose 61% in 2021, including a 54% year-over-year uptick for its latest quarter. Acquisitions have helped pad Twilio's growth over the years. Organic revenue rose a more modest 44% clip last year if you back out the bump in political election season revenue from late 2020, but the appeal of the platform remains strong. Retention rates are still healthy, and Twilio continues to successfully expand its offerings.Adaptive BiotechnologiesIt's been a rough year for Adaptive Biotechnologies. Its CFO resigned in January, and earlier this month the biotech upstart announced that it would be laying off 12% of its staff. The reorganization is part of Adaptive narrowing the focus of its immune system genetic sequencing technology to key in on minimal residual disease and immune medicine.The stock has been cut by more than half so far in 2022, and it's down 82% since peaking 14 months ago. The technology is promising, and Adaptive Biotechnologies is one of the stocks that Wood was buying earlier last week before she took a three-day break from purchases. Analysts don't see the company turning a profit for several more years, but that's not necessarily a deal breaker for biotech stocks as long as they have the liquidity in place to hold out for a medical breakthrough.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":164,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9034586112,"gmtCreate":1647919550468,"gmtModify":1676534280240,"author":{"id":"3568542354994015","authorId":"3568542354994015","name":"咩咩虎","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a6663bef57eca539a2c52ea184964654","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9034586112","repostId":"1187098701","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1187098701","pubTimestamp":1647916795,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1187098701?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-03-22 10:39","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why Shares of Coinbase Fell Nearly 5% on Monday","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1187098701","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"A prominent investor recently said he and his firm are shorting the stock.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>KEY POINTS</b></p><ul><li>Jim Chanos, a famous short seller, said he believes Coinbase is &#34;overearning&#34; right now.</li></ul><p><b>What happened</b></p><p>Shares of the large crypto exchange <b>Coinbase</b> fell nearly 5% today after a big investor took a short position in the company, which currently has a nearly $38.5 billion market cap.</p><p><b>So what</b></p><p>Veteran short seller Jim Chanos, who rose to prominence by shorting Enron before scandal engulfed the energy and commodities company and eventually took it out of business, now thinks Coinbase is overvalued.</p><p>Chanos of Kynikos Associates told CNBC Friday that he thinks Coinbase is a &#34;bubble stock.&#34; He added that he thinks the company&#39;s earnings could fall in the future and that they&#39;re based in part on a story:</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/812ca0aae6373f9a86efbded0dfd92f8\" tg-width=\"2000\" tg-height=\"1333\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>Image source: Getty Images.</span></p><blockquote>There are plenty of companies that are in the new economy that have real growth, real cash flows, and real earnings, but there&#39;s a lot that are just being sold on stories, and we would argue that Coinbase is one that&#39;s being sold on a story.</blockquote><p><b>Now what</b></p><p>Since going public in April of 2021, shares of Coinbase are down more than 48%. Shares rallied leading up to last November but have since come tumbling back down along with many other tech stocks. Analysts have broadly stayed bullish on the company, with the average median price target still close to $300, implying strong upside from the current stock price of around $176 per share.</p><p>As the price has come down, I&#39;ve been more bullish on Coinbase, especially as it continues to further diversify revenue and as cryptocurrencies like <b>Bitcoin</b> get more ingrained into the financial system.</p><p>But with a prominent short seller like Chanos now turning his eye on the company, it&#39;s definitely a good idea to retest your hypothesis and see if you can figure out where he may be coming from in terms of his comments on earnings.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why Shares of Coinbase Fell Nearly 5% on Monday</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy Shares of Coinbase Fell Nearly 5% on Monday\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-03-22 10:39 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/03/21/why-shares-of-coinbase-fell-today/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>KEY POINTSJim Chanos, a famous short seller, said he believes Coinbase is \"overearning\" right now.What happenedShares of the large crypto exchange Coinbase fell nearly 5% today after a big investor ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/03/21/why-shares-of-coinbase-fell-today/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"COIN":"Coinbase Global, Inc."},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/03/21/why-shares-of-coinbase-fell-today/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1187098701","content_text":"KEY POINTSJim Chanos, a famous short seller, said he believes Coinbase is \"overearning\" right now.What happenedShares of the large crypto exchange Coinbase fell nearly 5% today after a big investor took a short position in the company, which currently has a nearly $38.5 billion market cap.So whatVeteran short seller Jim Chanos, who rose to prominence by shorting Enron before scandal engulfed the energy and commodities company and eventually took it out of business, now thinks Coinbase is overvalued.Chanos of Kynikos Associates told CNBC Friday that he thinks Coinbase is a \"bubble stock.\" He added that he thinks the company's earnings could fall in the future and that they're based in part on a story:Image source: Getty Images.There are plenty of companies that are in the new economy that have real growth, real cash flows, and real earnings, but there's a lot that are just being sold on stories, and we would argue that Coinbase is one that's being sold on a story.Now whatSince going public in April of 2021, shares of Coinbase are down more than 48%. Shares rallied leading up to last November but have since come tumbling back down along with many other tech stocks. Analysts have broadly stayed bullish on the company, with the average median price target still close to $300, implying strong upside from the current stock price of around $176 per share.As the price has come down, I've been more bullish on Coinbase, especially as it continues to further diversify revenue and as cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin get more ingrained into the financial system.But with a prominent short seller like Chanos now turning his eye on the company, it's definitely a good idea to retest your hypothesis and see if you can figure out where he may be coming from in terms of his comments on earnings.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":223,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9034148838,"gmtCreate":1647835498150,"gmtModify":1676534270342,"author":{"id":"3568542354994015","authorId":"3568542354994015","name":"咩咩虎","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a6663bef57eca539a2c52ea184964654","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Nice","listText":"Nice","text":"Nice","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9034148838","repostId":"1109570743","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1109570743","pubTimestamp":1647830939,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1109570743?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-03-21 10:48","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Is Tesla a Good Stock to Buy in 2022? Yes, But Carefully.","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1109570743","media":"investorplace","summary":"Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA), with a revenue of $53.8 billion and a market capitalization of $900 billion, ha","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA), with a revenue of $53.8 billion and a market capitalization of $900 billion, has often been seen as an overvalued stock by analysts. However, the sentiment seems to be changing as gas prices continue to rise. Naturally, Tesla sales have already started to soar, and I believe it is just the start.</p><p>With Russia, the country that produces the most crude oil (the primary ingredient for gasoline) at war, gas prices can be expected to stay elevated for a lot longer than what was previously forecasted. Moreover, it is almost certain that many countries will be reducing their energy dependence on Russia. If that happens, gas prices will naturally go up as other suppliers have to cope with a sudden rise in demand.</p><p>Of course, Tesla cars are costly. However, gas costs also add up over time. Gas prices can be even more of a headache for those living in the rural U.S., where cars are almost a necessity.</p><p>Without a decline in gas prices, consumers might find Tesla cars more economical in the long term.</p><h2>TSLA Stock Is Still a Buy in the Long Term</h2><p>TSLA is still overvalued, at least from a conventional viewpoint. However, there is more to a stock than just its earnings and market cap. TSLA has been fundamentally overvalued for almost a decade, but it has still gone up.</p><p>For example, someone following this 2013 article would’ve missed out on the 2,100%-plus worth of gains TSLA has since had.</p><p>In a nutshell, traditional metrics don’t seem to work for TSLA. Furthermore, Tesla has continued to have exceptional revenue growth, and it is slowly bridging the gap between its market cap and revenue.</p><p>It is still worthwhile to remember that the market is very unpredictable. If the current world situation leads to a recession, there’s no doubt that TSLA would nosedive along with the rest of the market. A recession can also drag down gasoline prices, like it did in 2008 and 2020.</p><p>However, I still believe that even in the case of a recession, TSLA can recover in the long term. Tesla has been rapidly expanding, and in a world where countries are shifting more towards renewable energy, it would not be far-fetched to see TSLA valued more.</p><h2>Can TSLA Compete in the Long Term?</h2><p>Tesla took electric vehicles seriously early on, which gave it an edge over its competitors. Even now, Tesla still does not face any significant competition from its main competitors, and the company has essentially dominated the EV industry. Moreover, Tesla has the most advanced self-driving features of any car and one of the lowest maintenance costs. They’re essentially doing to EVs what Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) did with phones, offering user-friendliness at a premium.</p><p>Tesla’s competitors will undoubtedly catch up in the long run. However, Tesla will still command a significant portion of EV sales due to its popularity alone.</p><p>TSLA’s growth prospects also seem to be very promising. In 2021, Tesla produced over 930,000 cars. Moreover, it aims to reach 20 million EV sales per year by 2030 , and at Tesla’s current growth rate, it is definitely possible.</p><p>One should also note that Tesla is not just an EV company. It produces many energy products that add to its revenue, such as solar roofs and storage or charging solutions. They will also undoubtedly profit from the world’s transition to renewable energy. In short, I believe that TSLA is here to stay for the long term.</p><p>TSLA stock is still a risky buy in the short term due to the market’s uncertainty. However, I still believe that in the case of a market crash, Tesla will still inevitably recover. If a recession does not occur in the near future, the stock will likely reverse trends due to rising gas prices and soaring sales.</p><p>I do believe that in the long term, it can return a lot of profit. For the short term, making big moves in the current uncertain market is still very risky and should be avoided. Thus, I believe that anyone that seeks into invest in TSLA stock should not invest large amounts of capital. At least until the market shows more stability.</p></body></html>","source":"lsy1606302653667","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Is Tesla a Good Stock to Buy in 2022? Yes, But Carefully.</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nIs Tesla a Good Stock to Buy in 2022? Yes, But Carefully.\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-03-21 10:48 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://investorplace.com/2022/03/why-tsla-stock-can-still-be-profitable/><strong>investorplace</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA), with a revenue of $53.8 billion and a market capitalization of $900 billion, has often been seen as an overvalued stock by analysts. However, the sentiment seems to be changing as...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://investorplace.com/2022/03/why-tsla-stock-can-still-be-profitable/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"https://investorplace.com/2022/03/why-tsla-stock-can-still-be-profitable/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1109570743","content_text":"Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA), with a revenue of $53.8 billion and a market capitalization of $900 billion, has often been seen as an overvalued stock by analysts. However, the sentiment seems to be changing as gas prices continue to rise. Naturally, Tesla sales have already started to soar, and I believe it is just the start.With Russia, the country that produces the most crude oil (the primary ingredient for gasoline) at war, gas prices can be expected to stay elevated for a lot longer than what was previously forecasted. Moreover, it is almost certain that many countries will be reducing their energy dependence on Russia. If that happens, gas prices will naturally go up as other suppliers have to cope with a sudden rise in demand.Of course, Tesla cars are costly. However, gas costs also add up over time. Gas prices can be even more of a headache for those living in the rural U.S., where cars are almost a necessity.Without a decline in gas prices, consumers might find Tesla cars more economical in the long term.TSLA Stock Is Still a Buy in the Long TermTSLA is still overvalued, at least from a conventional viewpoint. However, there is more to a stock than just its earnings and market cap. TSLA has been fundamentally overvalued for almost a decade, but it has still gone up.For example, someone following this 2013 article would’ve missed out on the 2,100%-plus worth of gains TSLA has since had.In a nutshell, traditional metrics don’t seem to work for TSLA. Furthermore, Tesla has continued to have exceptional revenue growth, and it is slowly bridging the gap between its market cap and revenue.It is still worthwhile to remember that the market is very unpredictable. If the current world situation leads to a recession, there’s no doubt that TSLA would nosedive along with the rest of the market. A recession can also drag down gasoline prices, like it did in 2008 and 2020.However, I still believe that even in the case of a recession, TSLA can recover in the long term. Tesla has been rapidly expanding, and in a world where countries are shifting more towards renewable energy, it would not be far-fetched to see TSLA valued more.Can TSLA Compete in the Long Term?Tesla took electric vehicles seriously early on, which gave it an edge over its competitors. Even now, Tesla still does not face any significant competition from its main competitors, and the company has essentially dominated the EV industry. Moreover, Tesla has the most advanced self-driving features of any car and one of the lowest maintenance costs. They’re essentially doing to EVs what Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) did with phones, offering user-friendliness at a premium.Tesla’s competitors will undoubtedly catch up in the long run. However, Tesla will still command a significant portion of EV sales due to its popularity alone.TSLA’s growth prospects also seem to be very promising. In 2021, Tesla produced over 930,000 cars. Moreover, it aims to reach 20 million EV sales per year by 2030 , and at Tesla’s current growth rate, it is definitely possible.One should also note that Tesla is not just an EV company. It produces many energy products that add to its revenue, such as solar roofs and storage or charging solutions. They will also undoubtedly profit from the world’s transition to renewable energy. In short, I believe that TSLA is here to stay for the long term.TSLA stock is still a risky buy in the short term due to the market’s uncertainty. However, I still believe that in the case of a market crash, Tesla will still inevitably recover. If a recession does not occur in the near future, the stock will likely reverse trends due to rising gas prices and soaring sales.I do believe that in the long term, it can return a lot of profit. For the short term, making big moves in the current uncertain market is still very risky and should be avoided. Thus, I believe that anyone that seeks into invest in TSLA stock should not invest large amounts of capital. At least until the market shows more stability.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":200,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9035301747,"gmtCreate":1647500707403,"gmtModify":1676534238046,"author":{"id":"3568542354994015","authorId":"3568542354994015","name":"咩咩虎","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a6663bef57eca539a2c52ea184964654","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9035301747","repostId":"1167295109","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1167295109","pubTimestamp":1647496228,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1167295109?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-03-17 13:50","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Powell’s Press Conference Transcript: U.S. Economy Is Strong and Can Weather Rate Increases","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1167295109","media":"The Wall Street Journal","summary":"Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell discussed why the central bank raised interest rates, its out","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell discussed why the central bank raised interest rates, its outlook for how long it will take for inflation to ease, and plans for reducing the size of the Fed’s nearly $9 trillion balance sheet, during a press conference Wednesday after the latest monetary policy meeting. Here is a transcript of his comments.</p><p>JEROME H. POWELL: Good afternoon. I want to begin by acknowledging the tremendous hardship the Ukrainian people are suffering as a result of Russia’s invasion. The human toll is tragic. The financial and economic implications for the global economy and the U.S. economy are highly uncertain.</p><p>At the Federal Reserve we are strongly committed to achieving the monetary policy goals that Congress has given us, maximum employment and price stability. Today, in support of these goals, the FOMC raised its policy interest rate by one-quarter percentage point. The economy is very strong, and against the backdrop of an extremely tight labor market and high inflation the committee anticipates ongoing increases in the target range for the federal-funds rate will be appropriate. In addition, we expect to begin reducing the size of our balance sheet at a coming meeting.</p><p>Economic activity expanded at a robust 5 ½ percent pace last year, reflecting progress on vaccinations and the reopening of the economy, fiscal and monetary policy support, and the healthy financial positions of households and businesses. The rapid spread of the Omicron variant led to some slowing in economic activity early this year, but cases have declined sharply since mid-January and the slowdown seems to have been mild and brief.</p><p>Although the invasion of Ukraine and related events represent a downside risk to the outlook for economic activity, FOMC participants continue to foresee solid growth. As shown in our Summary of Economic Projections, the median projection for real GDP growth stands at 2.8 percent this year, 2.2 percent next year, and 2 percent in 2024.</p><p>The labor market has continued to strengthen and is extremely tight. Over the first two months of the year, employment rose by more than a million jobs. In February, the unemployment rate hit a post-pandemic low of 3.8 percent, a bit below the median of committee participants’ estimates of its longer-run normal level.</p><p>The improvements in labor market conditions have been widespread, including for workers at the lower end of the wage distribution as well as for African-Americans and Hispanics. Labor demand is very strong. And while labor-force participation has increased somewhat, labor supply remains subdued. As a result, employers are having difficulties filling job openings and wages are rising at their fastest pace in many years. FOMC participants expect the labor market to remain strong, with the median projection for the unemployment rate declining to 3.5 percent by the end of this year and remaining near that level thereafter.</p><p>Inflation remains well above our longer-run goal of 2 percent. Aggregate demand is strong, and bottlenecks and supply constraints are limiting how quickly production can respond. These supply disruptions have been larger and longer lasting than anticipated, exacerbated by waves of the virus here and abroad, and price pressures have spread to a broader range of goods and services.</p><p>Additionally, higher energy prices are driving up overall inflation. The surge in prices of crude oil and other commodities that resulted from Russia’s invasion of Ukraine will put additional upward pressure on near-term inflation here at home.</p><p>We understand that high inflation imposes significant hardship, especially on those least able to meet the higher costs of essentials like food, housing, and transportation. We know that the best thing we can do to support a strong labor market is to promote a long expansion, and that is only possible in an environment of price stability.</p><p>As we emphasized in our policy statement, with appropriate firming in the stance of monetary policy we expect inflation to return to 2 percent while the labor market remains strong. That said, inflation is likely to take longer to return to our price-stability goal than previously expected. The median inflation projection of FOMC participants is 4.3 percent this year, and falls to 2.7 percent next year and 2.3 percent in 2024. This trajectory is notably higher than projected in December, and participants continue to see risks as weighted to the upside.</p><p>The Fed’s monetary policy actions have been guided by our mandate to promote maximum employment and stable prices for the American people. Our policy has been adapting to the evolving economic environment and it will continue to do so. As I noted, the committee raised the target range for the federal-funds rate by one-quarter percentage point and anticipates that ongoing increases in the target range will be appropriate. The median projection for the appropriate level of the federal-funds rate is 1.9 percent at the end of this year, a full percentage point higher than projected in December. Over the following two years the median projection is 2.8 percent, somewhat higher than the median estimate of its longer-run value. Of course, these projections do not represent a committee decision or plan, and no one knows with any certainty where the economy will be a year or more from now.</p><p>Reducing the size of our balance sheet will also play an important role in firming the stance of monetary policy. At our meeting that wrapped up today the committee made good progress on a plan for reducing our securities holdings, and we expect to announce the beginning of balance-sheet reduction at a coming meeting. In making decisions about interest rates and the balance sheet, we will be mindful of the broader context in markets and in the economy. And we will use our tools to support financial and macroeconomic stability.</p><p>As we noted in our policy statement, the implications of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine for the U.S. economy are highly uncertain. In addition to the direct effects from higher global oil and commodity prices, the invasion and related events may restrain economic activity abroad and further disrupt supply chains, which would create spillovers to the U.S. economy through trade and other channels. The volatility in the financial markets, particularly if sustained, could also act to tighten credit conditions and affect the real economy.</p><p>Making appropriate monetary policy in this environment requires a recognition that the economy often evolves in unexpected ways. We will need to be nimble in responding to incoming data and the evolving outlook, and we will strive to avoid adding uncertainty what is—to what is already an extraordinarily challenging and uncertain moment. We are attentive to the risks of potential further upward pressure on inflation and inflation expectations. The committee is determined to take the measures necessary to restore price stability. The American economy is very strong and well-positioned to handle tighter monetary policy.</p><p>To conclude, we understand that our actions affect communities, families, and businesses across the country. Everything we do is in service to our public mission. We at the Fed will do everything we can to achieve our maximum employment and price stability goals.</p><p>Thank you. I look forward to your questions.</p><p>Q: Hi, Chair Powell. Thank you so much for taking our questions. I wonder if you could detail your thinking a little bit about how you’re considering the—you know, the risks of going too fast and potentially tipping the economy into a recession, and how you’re weighing those risks against the possibility of going too slowly, allowing inflation to become embedded, and kind of getting behind the curve.</p><p>MR. POWELL: So I guess I would start by saying that in my view the probability of a recession within the next year is not particularly elevated. And why do I say that? Aggregate demand is currently strong and most forecasters expect it to remain so. If you look at the labor market, also very strong. Conditions are tight and payroll job growth is continuing at very high levels. Household and business balance sheets are strong. And so all signs are that this is a strong economy—indeed, one that will be able to flourish—not to say withstand, but certainly flourish as well in the face of less-accommodative monetary policy.</p><p>So I guess that’s how I would say I’m looking at that. Of course the objective is to achieve price stability while also sustaining a strong labor market. And that is our overall objective, but we feel the economy is very strong and well-positioned to withstand tighter monetary policy.</p><p>Q: Hi, Chair Powell. I was wondering, in the—in the SEP you have quite a markdown to GDP, from 4 to 2.8 percent. I’m wondering, how much that do you feel is a result of the Fed’s stiffer-than-expected action here? We talk about monetary policy operating with a lag, but is this going to bite quicker than expected?</p><p>MR. POWELL: I don’t think that’s a big piece of it, actually. I think some of that is just an early assessment of the effects of spillovers from the war in Eastern Europe, which will hit our economy through a number of channels. Highly uncertain, but you know, you’re looking at higher oil prices, higher commodity prices. It will be—so we think that will weigh on GDP to some extent, so that’s part of what moved the—those assessments down.</p><p>I don’t think—I mean, I think generally monetary policy works with a lag, so some of that would also be in there. But remember, as well, that 2.8 percent is still very strong growth. If we think that—we think that the potential growth rate of the economy is somewhere between—somewhere around 1 ¾ percent, 2.8 percent is strong economic growth. It would have been one of the strongest years, in fact, of the last expansion. Wo while it’s lower than last year’s 5.8 percent, it’s still quite strong growth. So I would say it’s a—it’s quite a strong forecast.</p><p>Q: So, in that—in that context, what would trigger you to go faster or slower on the rate hikes? Ongoing increases doesn’t really tell us whether this is going to come in bigger chunks or evenly paced through the year.</p><p>MR. POWELL: Yeah. So, you know, the way we’re—the way we’re thinking about this is that every meeting is a live meeting. And we’re going to be looking at evolving conditions, and if we do conclude that it would be appropriate to move more quickly to remove accommodation then we’ll do so. I can’t be perfectly specific about it, but that’s certainly a possibility as we—as we go through the year.</p><p>Q: Thank you, Michelle. And thank you, Chair Powell, for taking our questions. I’m curious if you can be specific on when you expect to see inflation will start to come down, especially with the combination of rates going up, fiscal aid dissipating from the economy, and supply chains getting better. If you don’t start to see that, how will you signal it? What will you be looking for and what will you be looking for over the course of the year? Thank you.</p><p>MR. POWELL: So I guess I would say that at the—if you—before the invasion of Ukraine by Russia—so let’s go back to that—I would have said that the expectation was that inflation would peak sometime in the first quarter, maybe the end of the first quarter of this year, and then maybe stay at that level or a little bit lower and then start to come down in the back half of the year. So now we’re—you know, we’re getting—we’re going—we’re already seeing a little bit of short-term upward pressure in inflation due to higher oil prices, natural gas a little bit but not so much for us since we have our own natural gas supply, other commodities prices.</p><p>The other thing is that you’re seeing supply chain issues around shipping and around, you know, lots of countries and companies and people not wanting to touch Russian goods. So that’s going to mean more tangled supply chains. So that could actually push out the relief we were expecting on supply chains generally.</p><p>So I guess I would say that the expectation is still that inflation will begin to come down in the second half of the year. But if you look at where—I read the SEP headline median. We still expect inflation to be high this year. Lower than last year. And then we – we expect, though—particularly with the effects of the war but also the data we’ve seen so far this year, we expect inflation to remain high through the middle of the year, begin to come down, and come down more sharply next year.</p><p>Q: Nick Timiraos of The Wall Street Journal. Chair Powell, over the last six months the Fed has shifted its policy stance quite a bit. Six months ago, you were buying assets. Most officials weren’t projecting any interest rate increases this year. And yet, despite the shift over the last six months, real rates are as negative today as they were then. So how concerned are you that further inflation surprises will offset the effects of recent policy firming by leading real rates to stay at levels that do not actually provide much restraint to the economy? Thanks.</p><p>MR. POWELL: So that’s one of many ways of capturing the situation, which is that we—the committee really does understand that the time for rate increases and for shrinking the balance sheet has come. And I would just say—I would go back to the economy is very strong, as I mentioned, tremendous momentum in the labor market. We expect growth to continue. As I—and it’s clearly time to raise interest rates and begin the balance sheet shrinkage. And I just wanted to say that as I looked around the table at today’s meeting I saw a committee that’s acutely aware of the need to return to economy to price stability and determined to use our tools to do exactly that.</p><p>You couched it in terms of real rates. I would say if you look at the—at the SEP you’ve got people getting close to or even above in many cases their estimate of the longer-run neutral rate. So I understand that doesn’t do it for real rates, but if you go out a year or two many people are—in their forecasts are having—are having tight policy from a real—a real interest rate standpoint. So that’s something that we’re focused on.</p><p>Of course, it’s a—it’s a highly uncertain environment. And you know, we don’t know what’s going to happen and—but we do know that we’re going to deploy our tools to achieve our goals, and that includes the price stability goal.</p><p>Q: Hi, Chair Powell. So, looking at the Summary of Economic Projections, you all have inflation coming down over the course of the year to 4.3 percent and then you also have rates going up to what appears to still be below roughly what would be estimated to be the neutral rate, although I know that’s a little bit uncertain. So I was just wondering, how much of inflation coming down do you see as actually being as a result of the Fed itself raising rates? And then, also, if I could just ask, given that Sarah Bloom Raskin withdrew her nomination, what do you expect to do with the regulatory portfolio? Do you expect to assign a governor in charge of that?</p><p>MR. POWELL: OK. So, sorry, tell me—tell me again your first question.</p><p>Q: My first question is how much do you expect inflation to come down as a direct result of the Fed’s actions.?</p><p>MR. POWELL: OK. So part of—part of inflation coming down at the very beginning is clearly to do with factors other than our policy, and those would include potentially supply chains getting a little bit better, certainly base effects. You’re lapping—as you know, when you look at a 12-month trailing window you’re lapping very high inflation in March, April, May, June of last year, so there should be effects from that in a 12—in a 12-month picture. Really, what we’re looking for, though, is month-by-month inflation coming down. And so it’s really—it’s all the things we’ve been talking about, you know, that really haven’t helped much, including the shift away from goods and back to services, including supply chains getting better, including work—labor-force participation, all those things that have been sticky and not happening. But a big part of it is—though, is the base effects I mentioned as well.</p><p>You know, I think monetary policy starts to bite on inflation and on—and on growth, with a lag of course, and so you would see more in ’23 and ’24. But also, remember, we started talking about rate increases last year. For some months now, the financial conditions have already incorporated a significant number of rate increases, so it doesn’t start today. In effect, the moves are already priced into the market for a few months now. So the clock is running on that, and I think some of that will be seen in the second half of the year as well.</p><p>And on—so on the regulatory portfolio, so I would just say this. You know, we have an obligation to carry out under the law in supervision and regulation, and we’re doing that. That’s what we’re doing. The committee is not active, so what’s happening is things are coming to the full board and we’re voting on them. We’re getting our business done. You know, we got the stress tests done. We’ve looked at a—you know, a number of proposals for mergers and things like that. So we are—we’re working ahead. Of course, we don’t have a vice chair for supervision, as you mentioned, but we’re making do with the situation we have and a good number of things have come straight to the board for approval.</p><p>Q: Hi, Chair Powell. It’s Neil Irwin at Axios. Thanks for taking our questions. In the Statement (sic; Summary) of Economic Projections we see a forecast of median 1.9 percent fed-funds rate at the end of the year, 2.8 end of next year. Wonder whether that aligns with your own expectations, in particular on that point of overshooting the long-term neutral rate, and also if you can tell us anything about how that may be paced—frontloaded, backloaded? How high is the bar for doing 50 at one meeting?</p><p>MR. POWELL: So I don’t—Neil, I’ve never talked about my own SEP projection. It’s in there, but you know, I think Fed chairs have generally not done that because—we just haven’t done it. It’s because we’re—you know, we’re—we have to put together the consensus on the committee and present that consensus. So I wouldn’t talk about my individual one.</p><p>And in terms of the pacing of it, I would just point out that that is—there’s seven remaining meetings this year. This isn’t something we discuss or debate or agree on, but there’s seven remaining meetings and there’s seven rate hikes. I would add there’s also the shrinkage of the balance sheet, which—people do the math different ways, but that might be the equivalent of another rate increase just from the runoff of the balance sheet. So I don’t—but I don’t know—we haven’t made any decisions on front-end loading or going steadily through the year.</p><p>And as I mentioned, you know, if you look at the SEP, a good number of participants do see more than seven rate increases this year. And I can’t give you—I’m not going to try to give you a really specific test for what it would be take to do that, but I will say this, though. We’ll be looking at the—at the data as they come in. We’ll be looking to see whether the data show expected improvement on inflation. We’ll be looking at the inflation outlook and making a judgment. And we’ll be going—each meeting is a live meeting, and if we conclude that it would be appropriate to raise interest rates more quickly then we’ll do so.</p><p>Q: Yeah. Thank you, Chair Powell. Thank you, Michelle, for the question. I have a more basic question. The last time the CPI inflation—I know you look at PCE, but CPI inflation was at high as it is was July of 1981, when the effective federal-funds rate was 19.2 percent. But given the current data, how far behind the curve of inflation do you believe the Federal Reserve is, in your mind?</p><p>MR. POWELL: So I just would say a couple things. We have the tools that we need and we’re going to use them. And as you can see, we have a plan over the course of this year to raise interest rates steadily and also to run off the balance sheet. We will take the necessary steps to ensure that high inflation does not become entrenched while also supporting a strong labor market. And as I mentioned, if we conclude that it would be appropriate to move more quickly, we’ll do so.</p><p>I’ll leave it to others to make—to make the judgment you asked for.</p><p>Q: And just as a follow on that, I wanted to get you on the record on this. What impact has there been on your job, given the fact that — (audio break).</p><p>MR. POWELL: We lost you in the middle of the question.</p><p>(Pause.)</p><p>Q: (In progress following audio break)—the impact that—given you’re not actually confirmed and Governor Brainard is not actually confirmed, has there been any impact on your job or the Fed’s ability to handle inflation?</p><p>MR. POWELL: None whatsoever.</p><p>Q: Thank you, Michelle. Chair Powell, how concerned is the committee about the notable pickup in services inflation, which is perhaps less likely to self-correct? And to what extent does it alter both the committee’s confidence that long-term inflation expectations will not de-anchor in the coming months as well as the balance of risk that the Fed may need to raise interest rates further above neutral than indicated in the dot plot? Thank you.</p><p>MR. POWELL: Thank you. So, of course, that’s something we’re watching report by report, and we’re certainly—we noticed it in the last meeting and it’s part of the overall picture. We have expected services inflation to move back up to where it was, and that’s—part of what’s happening is, in the case of some services, prices are still getting back up to where they were before the—before the crisis. In other cases, it’s pretty clear that inflation has spread more broadly across services. And yes, that is concerning.</p><p>In the meanwhile, we see some progress on the goods side, but really at this—in this latest report it was confined to vehicles, which is, admittedly, a large category. So, you know, as I mentioned, the committee acutely feels its obligation to move to make sure that we restore price stability and is determined to use its tools to do so.</p><p>Q: Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I wonder if you could help me understand the kind of logic, if there is one inside the SEP here. As I look at the median forecast, for example, for unemployment it runs for the three-year window below the long-run rate. I look at inflation being above over the three-year window the long-run or call it the neutral rate, so the economy still runs hot. And that is all true in a regime when you run at least for two years the funds rate above the long-run rate. I guess my question is this: Are you not—give a forecast here that, essentially, suggests you will be continuing to run further behind the curve and never really get in front of inflation because the economy will continue to run hot?</p><p>And kind of on a related issue, you said earlier inflation will take longer to return to price stability than we had originally expected. Isn’t that a choice you’re making? And, if so, why are you making that choice to let inflation run above price stability longer than you’d like?</p><p>MR. POWELL: Right. So if you look, our—first of all, there is no—you’re looking at medians. But understand that there’s no—it’s not something we voted on. It’s not a plan. But if you look, people do have their—by the end of this year, broadly, people are at or close to or, in some cases, above their estimates of longer-run neutral interest rate. OK. So that should stop pushing—that should—in other words, that should be a removal of accommodation for monetary policy, basically. At the same time, we will have done significant balance sheet runoff and you can think of that as further.</p><p>In the next year, and just looking at the median, you’re now above the—you know, above the—what people estimate to be the longer-run median so—and also in many people’s forecasts that actually amounts to, you know, tight policy under—in real rates as well.</p><p>So why does unemployment remain at 3.5 percent? You know, it—I mean, a couple points. One is the connection between—in the economy we had before the pandemic the connection between inflation and the level of the unemployment rate was not very tight. But this is—clearly, what this is is an expectation that, really, it amounts to that the idea that wage increases, which are now running above the level that would be consistent over the long run with 2 percent inflation will move back down to levels which are still very attractive full economy kind of—full employment kind of wages, but not to a point where they’re pushing up inflation anymore.</p><p>And as I mentioned, there are a lot of factors causing inflation to come down and, you know, the reality is there are many, many moving pieces and we don’t know what will actually happen. But no matter what happens, this is a committee that is determined to use its tools to make sure that higher inflation does not become entrenched, and so we are determined on that front and we’ll deal with what comes. This is—this is a modal or most likely expectation, but we will—we’ll deal with what comes whether it’s better or worse.</p><p>Q: Hi. Thank you. Well, let me follow up a bit on that. I mean, there are a lot of economists skeptical that you can reduce inflation as much as you’ve penciled in without raising the unemployment rate, and I’m wondering just what are the mechanisms you see in reducing demand. I mean, outside housing and autos, how do higher Fed rates reduce consumer demand unless it’s through higher unemployment? Thank you.</p><p>MR. POWELL: Well, if you take a look at today’s labor market, what you have is 1.7-plus job openings for every unemployed person. So that’s a very, very tight labor market, tight to an unhealthy level, I would say.</p><p>So, in principle, if you were—let’s say that our tools work about as you described and the idea is we’re trying to better align demand and supply, let’s just say, in the labor market. So it would actually—if you were just moving down the number of job openings so that they were more like one to one you would have less upward pressure on wages. You would have a lot less of a labor shortage, which is going on pretty much across the economy. We’re hearing from companies that they can’t hire enough people. They’re having a hard time hiring.</p><p>So that’s, really, the thinking there. You know, these are fairly well understood channels, interest sensitive, and, basically, across the economy we’d like to slow demand so that it’s better aligned with supply. Give supply, at the same time, time to recover and get into a better—you know, a better alignment of supply and demand and that, over time, should bring inflation down.</p><p>And I’ll say again, though, you know, we don’t have a perfect crystal ball about the future and we’re prepared to use our tools as needed to restore price stability. You know, as I mentioned in my opening remarks, without price stability you really can’t have a sustained period of maximum employment. It’s our—one of our most fundamental obligations is to maintain and restore, in this case, price stability.</p><p>So we’re very committed to that. Of course, the plan is to restore price stability while also sustaining a strong labor market. That is our intention and we believe we can do that. But we have to restore price stability.</p><p>Q: Thanks, and I apologize if this covers some of the same ground you just talked about, Mr. Chair. I think I missed some of your answer there. But I have a follow-up question on the labor force. We have seen some gains in the prime age workforce in the last few months. I wonder what you anticipate when it comes to some of the older workers as the health outlook has changed. Are we going to see more recent retirees following Tom Brady back into the workforce and what would that mean for wages and inflation?</p><p>MR. POWELL: It’s hard to say. You know, the—what we saw in the last cycle was that over the course of a long, steady expansion, labor-force participation outperformed expectations and that was just a—you know, it was a tight labor market that wasn’t—it was nowhere near as tight as this labor market.</p><p>But it was a tight labor market and so people stayed in the labor force longer. It wasn’t so much people coming back in the labor force after retirement. That’s not something that happens in the aggregate very much. But so that’s what was happening. And, you know, more labor-force participation is tremendously welcome and, of course, our policy does not in any way preclude that.</p><p>This is a situation where wages have moved up at the highest rate in a very long time and people are able to quit their jobs and move to better paying jobs in the same industry or different industries. So it’s a really attractive labor market for people, and once—you know, as we get past Covid well and truly it becomes an even more attractive one.</p><p>So we hope that that will lead to more labor supply. That’s a good thing for the country, it’s a good thing for people, and it also will, we think, help relieve some of the wage pressures that do put inflation more at risk. That last part is—we’ll have to see whether empirically it winds up—works out that way. But, in principle, it ought to help with inflation as well. It’s not the only thing we’re looking for, though, from inflation. We’re looking for help from another different—a number of different places and, most importantly, from our own policy.</p><p>Q: Thank you, Michelle. And thank you, Chair Powell. I’m sorry. I’m having some communication problems so I missed some of the stuff you’ve said and my apologies if this has been asked. Since the FOMC met last January, financial conditions have tightened markedly—equity prices down, Treasury yields up, bond spreads risen, yield curve has flattened a lot and even further today, dollar is up. Is that welcome? And would you like to see more in order to achieve your goals? Thank you.</p><p>MR. POWELL: So, as you know, policy works through financial conditions. That’s how it reaches the real economy by just the mechanisms you mentioned, and remember that the financial conditions we had for the last couple of years were a function not only of a very aggressive, and appropriately so, fiscal policy but also highly accommodative monetary policy—the monetary policy settings that we put in place at the worst parts of the pandemic.</p><p>So it is very appropriate to move away from those. And, yes, that will lead to some tightening of financial conditions in the form of higher interest rates and just the sorts of things. We’re not targeting any one or more of those things, but financial conditions generally should move to a more normal level so that we—because we know the economy no longer needs or wants these very highly accommodative stances which, you know. So it’s time to move to a more normal setting of financial conditions. And we do that by moving monetary policy itself to more normal levels.</p><p>Q: When you say move to a more normal setting for financial conditions, that suggests to me that you want financial conditions to tighten further from where we are now. Am I drawing the right inference from that?</p><p>MR. POWELL: Well, yes. So I would say we look at a broad range of financial conditions. And of course when we tighten monetary policy we do expect that they will adjust in sync over time with monetary policy. It’s not any particular financial condition, but a broad range of financial conditions. They will reflect, to some extent—they reflect any number of things. But, yes, we need our policy to transmit to the real economy. And it does through financial conditions. Which means as we tighten policy or remove accommodation so that it’s at least less accommodative, that broader financial conditions will also be less accommodative.</p><p>Q: Hi, Chair Powell. I wanted to ask about the balance sheet discussion you’ve had at this meeting. Can you give us any more details? Did you discuss whether to cap runoffs and whether to increase those caps, over what period? If there were any details.</p><p>MR. POWELL: Yes. Thank you for asking. So at our meeting today and yesterday we made excellent progress toward agreeing on the parameters of a plan to shrink the balance sheet. And I’d say we’re now in a position to finalize and implement that plan so that we’re actually beginning runoff at a coming meeting. And that could come as soon as our next meeting in May. That’s not a decision that we’ve made, but I would say that that’s how well our discussions went in the last two days. So a couple things just to add, we’ll be mindful of the broader financial and economic context when we made the decision on timing. And we always want to use our tools to support macroeconomic and financial stability. We want to avoid adding uncertainty to what’s a highly uncertain situation already. So all of that will go into the thinking of the timing around this.</p><p>In terms of the—I would say this, I don’t want to get too much into the details because we’re literally just finalizing them, but the framework is going to look very familiar to people who are familiar with the last—the last time we did this. But it’ll be faster than the last time and, of course, it’s much sooner in a cycle than last time. But it will look—it will look familiar to you. And I would also say that there’ll be—I’m sure there’ll be a more detailed discussion of our—of our—in the minutes to our meeting that come out in three weeks, where I expect we’ll lay out, you know, pretty much the parameters of what we’re looking at, which I think will look quite familiar.</p><p>Q: Mr. Chairman, since September of 2020 you’ve been operating on a monetary policy framework that let the economy run hot to bring unemployment down. That seems to be over, but I’m wondering how you would describe your reaction function now? What is it that the Fed is trying to do, other than bring inflation down? In other words, is it we’re going to keep raising rates until it comes down to an acceptable level?</p><p>MR. POWELL: Yeah, so I want to clear one thing up again. And that is that nothing in our—in our new framework or in the changes that we made has caused us to wait longer to raise interest rates. What we said in the framework changes was—and this was really a reflection of what had happened for the proceeding couple of decades, actually. What we said was: If we see, you know, low unemployment, high employment, but we don’t see inflation then we’re not going to raise rates until we actually see inflation. That’s what we said, and that was the sense of it.</p><p>There was no sense in which if we got a burst of really high inflation, we would wait to raise rates. That’s simply not in the framework. In fact, quite the contrary. The framework is all about anchoring inflation expectations at 2 percent. So I do hear this, you know, that the framework—and really, we can’t blame the framework. It was a sudden, unexpected burst of inflation, and then it was the reaction to it, and it was what it was. But it was not in any way caused or related—caused by or related to the framework.</p><p>So come to today, you know, I think our vision on this on the committee is very, very clear. What we see is a strong labor market. We see a labor market with a lot of momentum, great job creation, and we see the underlying economy strong, balance sheets are strong. Yes, there are threats to growth from—you know, from what’s going on in Eastern Europe. And but nonetheless, in the base case there’s a pretty broad expectation of strong growth. But inflation is far above our target.</p><p>And, you know, the help we’ve been expecting, and other forecasters have been expecting, from supply-side improvement, labor-force participation, bottlenecks, all those things getting better—it hasn’t come. And so we’re looking now to using our tools to restore price stability. And we’re committed to doing that. And you see that, I think, in the summary of economic projections. And you see that in the decision we made. And you’ll continue to see it in the decisions we make going forward.</p><p>Q: If I could follow up by asking, I guess what you’d call it, is the Paul Volcker question. You don’t think unemployment is going to rise significantly, but if it does, does that temper your desire to keep raising rates?</p><p>MR. POWELL: Well, the goal, of course, is to restore price stability while also sustaining a strong labor market. We have a dual mandate, and they’re sort of equal. But as I said earlier, you know, price stability is an essential goal. In fact, it’s a precondition really for achieving the kind of labor market that we want, which is a strong and sustained labor market. We saw the benefits of a long expansion, a sustained labor market that pulled people back in. And there were really no imbalances in the economy that threatened the long expansion. It just—the pandemic arrived. It was just a completely exogenous event.</p><p>So that’s how we’re thinking about it. We, of course, want to achieve, you know, price stability with a strong labor market. But we do understand also that really you can’t have maximum employment for any sustained period without price stability. So we need to focus on price stability, and particularly because the labor market is so strong and the economy is so strong. We feel like the economy can handle tighter monetary policy.</p><p>Q: Hi, Chair Powell. Hopefully, no tech issues here on this front. I wanted to ask just kind of the broad question about how you are communicating what the Fed’s doing here today to the average American, who might not be reading the dot plots or understanding what the SEP is. How is the 25-basis-point hike today and then the signaling on future Fed policy going to address the inflation that they’re feeling at the stores on a daily basis?</p><p>MR. POWELL: Sure. So I guess I’d start by just assuring everyone that we’re fully committed to bringing inflation back down and also sustaining the economic expansion. We do understand that these higher prices, no matter what the source, have real effects on people’s well-being. And really, high inflation takes a toll on everyone, but it’s really especially on people who use most of their income to buy essentials like food, housing, and transportation, where—I mean, we’ve all seen charts that show if you’re a middle-income person, you’ve got room to absorb some inflation. If you’re at the lower end of the income spectrum, it’s very hard because you’re spending most of your money already on necessities, and the price is going up. So but it’s punishing for everyone.</p><p>So it has been a difficult time for the economy. But we do anticipate that inflation will move back down, as I mentioned earlier. It may take longer than we like, but I’m confident that we’ll use our tools to bring inflation down. And you ask about rates, so the way that works, I would explain, is that as we raise interest rates, that should gradually slow down demand for the interest-sensitive parts of the economy. And so what we would see is demand slowing down, but just enough so that it’s better matched with supply. And that brings—that will bring inflation down over time. That’s our plan.</p><p>Q: Hi, Chair Powell. Thank you so much for taking my questions and doing this today. My question is a follow-up to what Brian just asked. What is your message to consumers out there who can no longer afford the basics, due to this high inflation?</p><p>MR. POWELL: Well, that is the—yes, indeed. As I just said, you know, I think we do understand very much, and we very much take to heart that it’s our obligation to restore price stability. And, you know, we’ve had price stability for a very long time, and maybe come to take it for granted. But now we see the pain. I’m old enough to remember what very high inflation was like. And, you know, we’re strongly committed as a committee to not allowing this higher inflation to become entrenched and to use our tools to bring inflation back down to more normal levels, which our target is 2 percent inflation.</p><p>So we will—we will do that. And I just would want people to understand that. And that’s—but the way we do that is by raising interest rates and by shrinking our balance sheet. And so financial conditions will become, at the margin, less supportive of various kinds of economic activity. That will slow the economy, while also allowing the labor market to remain very strong. And, you know, the good news is the economy and the labor market are quite strong, and that means the economy, we think, can handle interest rate increases.</p><p>Q: And as a quick follow-up to that, you know, obviously the Federal Reserve walking this very complicated, fine line of trying to avoid a recession. For the consumers out there who are worried about their jobs in a possible recession, what do you say to that?</p><p>MR. POWELL: Well, you know, I say that our intention is to bring inflation back down to 2 percent while still sustaining a strong labor market. And that the economy’s very strong. If you look at where forecasts are, you—people are forecasting growth that’s strong within the context of U.S. potential economic output. So and we expect that to continue. And to the extent the data come in different, then, of course, our policy will adapt. But we do believe that our policy is the appropriate one for this forecast. And we believe that we can bring down inflation. We believe that we can do so while sustaining a strong labor market.</p><p>The labor market is—it’s not strong in the ordinary sense of the world. We haven’t—word—we have not seen a labor market where there were 1.7 job opening for every unemployed person, or where if you add—if you add job openings to those who are employed, that’s actually substantially a larger number than the size of the workforce—than the number of people who actually count themselves as in the workforce. So this is a situation where demand is higher than supply. And when that happens, prices go up. And so we need to use our tools to move supply and demand back. And we don’t—we don’t think we need to do this alone. There will be other factors helping that happen. But we certainly are prepared to use our tools, and we will.</p><p>Q: Thank you, Michelle. Thank you, Chair Powell. Sorry to take you away from inflation for one minute. May I ask about the sanctions on Russia, and specifically the freezing of the central bank assets. Of course, that raises a similar risk for other sovereigns around the world, and their biggest companies potentially. Any concerns about, in the long term, how this might affect the dollar’s status as the pre-eminent global reserve currency? And in the past couple of weeks have you had to deliver any kinds of reassurance to other central bankers around the world?</p><p>MR. POWELL: Well, so, of course central bankers around the world are generally very in favor of these sanctions. But let me say this, sanctions are really the business of the elected government. And that’s true everywhere. So the administration, the Treasury Department in particular, and other agencies, they create these sanctions. We’re there to provide technical expertise, but they’re not—it’s not our decisions. And so I’m reluctant to comment on sanctions really much because, again, they’re not for us. We have a very specific mandate, and these are—these are really the province of elected governments, as I mentioned. So I’d have to leave it at that. Sorry.</p><p>Q: Hi, Chair Powell. Thanks for taking the question. You’ve been talking a lot about raising wages, which on the one hand is a great thing. But are we possibly seeing the beginning of a wage price spiral?</p><p>MR. POWELL: So the way I would say it is this: We—first of all, I would agree with the premise that wages moving up is a great thing. You know, that’s how the standard of living rises over time. And generally it’s driven over long periods by rising productivity. But what we have now, if you look at these—the wage increases that we have—we look at a—we’re blessed with a range of measures of wages that all measure different things. But right now they’re all showing the same thing, which is that the increases—not the levels, but the increases are running at levels that are well above what would be consistent with 2 percent inflation—our goal—over time. And that may be—we don’t know how persistent that phenomenon will be. It’s very hard to say.</p><p>And that’s really, I think, the sense of your question about a wage price spiral, is, is that something that’s going to start happening and become entrenched in the system? We don’t—we don’t see that. You can see, for example, in some sectors that got very high wage increases early on, those wage increases looked like they may have slowed down to a normal level. But it’s—it comes back to, you know, what I’m saying here, which is there is—there is a misalignment of demand and supply, particularly in the labor market, and that is leading to wages moving up at ways that are—that are not consistent with 2 percent inflation over time. And so we need to use our tools to, you know, guide inflation back down to 2 percent, and that would be in the context of an extraordinarily strong labor market.</p><p>We think this labor market can handle, as I mentioned, tighter monetary policy, and the overall economy can as well. But, yes, wages are moving up faster than is consistent with 2 percent inflation, but—it’s good to see them moving up, but it wouldn’t be sustainable over too long of a period to see them moving up that much higher. And that’s because of this misalignment between supply and demand. We expect to get more labor supply. We did last time. We got more than we expected last—during the last cycle. This time we’ve gotten much less than expected, so it’s not easy to predict these things. But we do expect that we’ll get people coming back in the labor market, particularly as Covid becomes less and less of a factor in many people’s lives—something we all wish. So that’s how we think about it.</p><p>Q: Hi, Chair Powell. I think you said at the Senate earlier this month that in hindsight the Fed should have moved earlier, and it sounds like today that you don’t think that the Fed is late, and I just wanted to get your clarification on that. And if it is—if you still think that the Fed is behind the curve, how much behind the curve is it?</p><p>MR. POWELL: Right. So we are—we are not—we don’t have the luxury of 20/20 hindsight in actually implementing real-time decisions in the world. So the—you know, so the question is—the right question is: Did you make the right decisions based on what you knew at the time? But that’s not the question I was answering, which is: Knowing what you know now. So I think if we knew now—of course, if we knew now that these supply blockages really and the inflation resulting from them in collision with, you know, very strong demand—if we knew that that was what was going to happen, then in hindsight, yes, it would have been appropriate to move earlier. Obviously, it would be. But again, we don’t—we don’t have that luxury. And then so—but that’s a separate question from your other question, which is behind the curve.</p><p>And you know, I don’t have the luxury of looking at it that way. You know, we are—we are—we have our tools, powerful tools, and the committee is very focused on using them. We’re acutely aware of the need to restore price stability while keeping a strong labor market. And what I saw today was a committee that is—that is strongly committed to achieving price stability in particular and prepared to use our tools to do that.</p><p>We’re not going to let high inflation become entrenched. The costs of that would be too high and we’re not going to wait so long that we have to do that. No one wants—no one wants to have to really put restrictive monetary policy on in order to get inflation back down. So, frankly, the need is one of getting back up—getting rates back up to more neutral levels as quickly as we practicably can and then moving beyond that if that turns out to be appropriate. And as you can see, it is appropriate in the—in the sense—to people’s SEPs, they do write down levels of interest rates that are above their estimate of the longer-run neutral rate. And there’s also a range of estimates, too, as you will see if you look at the details of the SEP.</p><p>But thanks for your question.</p><p>STAFF: OK. Thank you all. Thanks, Mr. Chair.</p><p>MR. POWELL: Thank you.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Powell’s Press Conference Transcript: U.S. Economy Is Strong and Can Weather Rate Increases</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nPowell’s Press Conference Transcript: U.S. Economy Is Strong and Can Weather Rate Increases\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-03-17 13:50 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.wsj.com/articles/transcript-fed-chief-powells-postmeeting-press-conference-11647467270><strong>The Wall Street Journal</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell discussed why the central bank raised interest rates, its outlook for how long it will take for inflation to ease, and plans for reducing the size of the Fed’s ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.wsj.com/articles/transcript-fed-chief-powells-postmeeting-press-conference-11647467270\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://www.wsj.com/articles/transcript-fed-chief-powells-postmeeting-press-conference-11647467270","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1167295109","content_text":"Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell discussed why the central bank raised interest rates, its outlook for how long it will take for inflation to ease, and plans for reducing the size of the Fed’s nearly $9 trillion balance sheet, during a press conference Wednesday after the latest monetary policy meeting. Here is a transcript of his comments.JEROME H. POWELL: Good afternoon. I want to begin by acknowledging the tremendous hardship the Ukrainian people are suffering as a result of Russia’s invasion. The human toll is tragic. The financial and economic implications for the global economy and the U.S. economy are highly uncertain.At the Federal Reserve we are strongly committed to achieving the monetary policy goals that Congress has given us, maximum employment and price stability. Today, in support of these goals, the FOMC raised its policy interest rate by one-quarter percentage point. The economy is very strong, and against the backdrop of an extremely tight labor market and high inflation the committee anticipates ongoing increases in the target range for the federal-funds rate will be appropriate. In addition, we expect to begin reducing the size of our balance sheet at a coming meeting.Economic activity expanded at a robust 5 ½ percent pace last year, reflecting progress on vaccinations and the reopening of the economy, fiscal and monetary policy support, and the healthy financial positions of households and businesses. The rapid spread of the Omicron variant led to some slowing in economic activity early this year, but cases have declined sharply since mid-January and the slowdown seems to have been mild and brief.Although the invasion of Ukraine and related events represent a downside risk to the outlook for economic activity, FOMC participants continue to foresee solid growth. As shown in our Summary of Economic Projections, the median projection for real GDP growth stands at 2.8 percent this year, 2.2 percent next year, and 2 percent in 2024.The labor market has continued to strengthen and is extremely tight. Over the first two months of the year, employment rose by more than a million jobs. In February, the unemployment rate hit a post-pandemic low of 3.8 percent, a bit below the median of committee participants’ estimates of its longer-run normal level.The improvements in labor market conditions have been widespread, including for workers at the lower end of the wage distribution as well as for African-Americans and Hispanics. Labor demand is very strong. And while labor-force participation has increased somewhat, labor supply remains subdued. As a result, employers are having difficulties filling job openings and wages are rising at their fastest pace in many years. FOMC participants expect the labor market to remain strong, with the median projection for the unemployment rate declining to 3.5 percent by the end of this year and remaining near that level thereafter.Inflation remains well above our longer-run goal of 2 percent. Aggregate demand is strong, and bottlenecks and supply constraints are limiting how quickly production can respond. These supply disruptions have been larger and longer lasting than anticipated, exacerbated by waves of the virus here and abroad, and price pressures have spread to a broader range of goods and services.Additionally, higher energy prices are driving up overall inflation. The surge in prices of crude oil and other commodities that resulted from Russia’s invasion of Ukraine will put additional upward pressure on near-term inflation here at home.We understand that high inflation imposes significant hardship, especially on those least able to meet the higher costs of essentials like food, housing, and transportation. We know that the best thing we can do to support a strong labor market is to promote a long expansion, and that is only possible in an environment of price stability.As we emphasized in our policy statement, with appropriate firming in the stance of monetary policy we expect inflation to return to 2 percent while the labor market remains strong. That said, inflation is likely to take longer to return to our price-stability goal than previously expected. The median inflation projection of FOMC participants is 4.3 percent this year, and falls to 2.7 percent next year and 2.3 percent in 2024. This trajectory is notably higher than projected in December, and participants continue to see risks as weighted to the upside.The Fed’s monetary policy actions have been guided by our mandate to promote maximum employment and stable prices for the American people. Our policy has been adapting to the evolving economic environment and it will continue to do so. As I noted, the committee raised the target range for the federal-funds rate by one-quarter percentage point and anticipates that ongoing increases in the target range will be appropriate. The median projection for the appropriate level of the federal-funds rate is 1.9 percent at the end of this year, a full percentage point higher than projected in December. Over the following two years the median projection is 2.8 percent, somewhat higher than the median estimate of its longer-run value. Of course, these projections do not represent a committee decision or plan, and no one knows with any certainty where the economy will be a year or more from now.Reducing the size of our balance sheet will also play an important role in firming the stance of monetary policy. At our meeting that wrapped up today the committee made good progress on a plan for reducing our securities holdings, and we expect to announce the beginning of balance-sheet reduction at a coming meeting. In making decisions about interest rates and the balance sheet, we will be mindful of the broader context in markets and in the economy. And we will use our tools to support financial and macroeconomic stability.As we noted in our policy statement, the implications of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine for the U.S. economy are highly uncertain. In addition to the direct effects from higher global oil and commodity prices, the invasion and related events may restrain economic activity abroad and further disrupt supply chains, which would create spillovers to the U.S. economy through trade and other channels. The volatility in the financial markets, particularly if sustained, could also act to tighten credit conditions and affect the real economy.Making appropriate monetary policy in this environment requires a recognition that the economy often evolves in unexpected ways. We will need to be nimble in responding to incoming data and the evolving outlook, and we will strive to avoid adding uncertainty what is—to what is already an extraordinarily challenging and uncertain moment. We are attentive to the risks of potential further upward pressure on inflation and inflation expectations. The committee is determined to take the measures necessary to restore price stability. The American economy is very strong and well-positioned to handle tighter monetary policy.To conclude, we understand that our actions affect communities, families, and businesses across the country. Everything we do is in service to our public mission. We at the Fed will do everything we can to achieve our maximum employment and price stability goals.Thank you. I look forward to your questions.Q: Hi, Chair Powell. Thank you so much for taking our questions. I wonder if you could detail your thinking a little bit about how you’re considering the—you know, the risks of going too fast and potentially tipping the economy into a recession, and how you’re weighing those risks against the possibility of going too slowly, allowing inflation to become embedded, and kind of getting behind the curve.MR. POWELL: So I guess I would start by saying that in my view the probability of a recession within the next year is not particularly elevated. And why do I say that? Aggregate demand is currently strong and most forecasters expect it to remain so. If you look at the labor market, also very strong. Conditions are tight and payroll job growth is continuing at very high levels. Household and business balance sheets are strong. And so all signs are that this is a strong economy—indeed, one that will be able to flourish—not to say withstand, but certainly flourish as well in the face of less-accommodative monetary policy.So I guess that’s how I would say I’m looking at that. Of course the objective is to achieve price stability while also sustaining a strong labor market. And that is our overall objective, but we feel the economy is very strong and well-positioned to withstand tighter monetary policy.Q: Hi, Chair Powell. I was wondering, in the—in the SEP you have quite a markdown to GDP, from 4 to 2.8 percent. I’m wondering, how much that do you feel is a result of the Fed’s stiffer-than-expected action here? We talk about monetary policy operating with a lag, but is this going to bite quicker than expected?MR. POWELL: I don’t think that’s a big piece of it, actually. I think some of that is just an early assessment of the effects of spillovers from the war in Eastern Europe, which will hit our economy through a number of channels. Highly uncertain, but you know, you’re looking at higher oil prices, higher commodity prices. It will be—so we think that will weigh on GDP to some extent, so that’s part of what moved the—those assessments down.I don’t think—I mean, I think generally monetary policy works with a lag, so some of that would also be in there. But remember, as well, that 2.8 percent is still very strong growth. If we think that—we think that the potential growth rate of the economy is somewhere between—somewhere around 1 ¾ percent, 2.8 percent is strong economic growth. It would have been one of the strongest years, in fact, of the last expansion. Wo while it’s lower than last year’s 5.8 percent, it’s still quite strong growth. So I would say it’s a—it’s quite a strong forecast.Q: So, in that—in that context, what would trigger you to go faster or slower on the rate hikes? Ongoing increases doesn’t really tell us whether this is going to come in bigger chunks or evenly paced through the year.MR. POWELL: Yeah. So, you know, the way we’re—the way we’re thinking about this is that every meeting is a live meeting. And we’re going to be looking at evolving conditions, and if we do conclude that it would be appropriate to move more quickly to remove accommodation then we’ll do so. I can’t be perfectly specific about it, but that’s certainly a possibility as we—as we go through the year.Q: Thank you, Michelle. And thank you, Chair Powell, for taking our questions. I’m curious if you can be specific on when you expect to see inflation will start to come down, especially with the combination of rates going up, fiscal aid dissipating from the economy, and supply chains getting better. If you don’t start to see that, how will you signal it? What will you be looking for and what will you be looking for over the course of the year? Thank you.MR. POWELL: So I guess I would say that at the—if you—before the invasion of Ukraine by Russia—so let’s go back to that—I would have said that the expectation was that inflation would peak sometime in the first quarter, maybe the end of the first quarter of this year, and then maybe stay at that level or a little bit lower and then start to come down in the back half of the year. So now we’re—you know, we’re getting—we’re going—we’re already seeing a little bit of short-term upward pressure in inflation due to higher oil prices, natural gas a little bit but not so much for us since we have our own natural gas supply, other commodities prices.The other thing is that you’re seeing supply chain issues around shipping and around, you know, lots of countries and companies and people not wanting to touch Russian goods. So that’s going to mean more tangled supply chains. So that could actually push out the relief we were expecting on supply chains generally.So I guess I would say that the expectation is still that inflation will begin to come down in the second half of the year. But if you look at where—I read the SEP headline median. We still expect inflation to be high this year. Lower than last year. And then we – we expect, though—particularly with the effects of the war but also the data we’ve seen so far this year, we expect inflation to remain high through the middle of the year, begin to come down, and come down more sharply next year.Q: Nick Timiraos of The Wall Street Journal. Chair Powell, over the last six months the Fed has shifted its policy stance quite a bit. Six months ago, you were buying assets. Most officials weren’t projecting any interest rate increases this year. And yet, despite the shift over the last six months, real rates are as negative today as they were then. So how concerned are you that further inflation surprises will offset the effects of recent policy firming by leading real rates to stay at levels that do not actually provide much restraint to the economy? Thanks.MR. POWELL: So that’s one of many ways of capturing the situation, which is that we—the committee really does understand that the time for rate increases and for shrinking the balance sheet has come. And I would just say—I would go back to the economy is very strong, as I mentioned, tremendous momentum in the labor market. We expect growth to continue. As I—and it’s clearly time to raise interest rates and begin the balance sheet shrinkage. And I just wanted to say that as I looked around the table at today’s meeting I saw a committee that’s acutely aware of the need to return to economy to price stability and determined to use our tools to do exactly that.You couched it in terms of real rates. I would say if you look at the—at the SEP you’ve got people getting close to or even above in many cases their estimate of the longer-run neutral rate. So I understand that doesn’t do it for real rates, but if you go out a year or two many people are—in their forecasts are having—are having tight policy from a real—a real interest rate standpoint. So that’s something that we’re focused on.Of course, it’s a—it’s a highly uncertain environment. And you know, we don’t know what’s going to happen and—but we do know that we’re going to deploy our tools to achieve our goals, and that includes the price stability goal.Q: Hi, Chair Powell. So, looking at the Summary of Economic Projections, you all have inflation coming down over the course of the year to 4.3 percent and then you also have rates going up to what appears to still be below roughly what would be estimated to be the neutral rate, although I know that’s a little bit uncertain. So I was just wondering, how much of inflation coming down do you see as actually being as a result of the Fed itself raising rates? And then, also, if I could just ask, given that Sarah Bloom Raskin withdrew her nomination, what do you expect to do with the regulatory portfolio? Do you expect to assign a governor in charge of that?MR. POWELL: OK. So, sorry, tell me—tell me again your first question.Q: My first question is how much do you expect inflation to come down as a direct result of the Fed’s actions.?MR. POWELL: OK. So part of—part of inflation coming down at the very beginning is clearly to do with factors other than our policy, and those would include potentially supply chains getting a little bit better, certainly base effects. You’re lapping—as you know, when you look at a 12-month trailing window you’re lapping very high inflation in March, April, May, June of last year, so there should be effects from that in a 12—in a 12-month picture. Really, what we’re looking for, though, is month-by-month inflation coming down. And so it’s really—it’s all the things we’ve been talking about, you know, that really haven’t helped much, including the shift away from goods and back to services, including supply chains getting better, including work—labor-force participation, all those things that have been sticky and not happening. But a big part of it is—though, is the base effects I mentioned as well.You know, I think monetary policy starts to bite on inflation and on—and on growth, with a lag of course, and so you would see more in ’23 and ’24. But also, remember, we started talking about rate increases last year. For some months now, the financial conditions have already incorporated a significant number of rate increases, so it doesn’t start today. In effect, the moves are already priced into the market for a few months now. So the clock is running on that, and I think some of that will be seen in the second half of the year as well.And on—so on the regulatory portfolio, so I would just say this. You know, we have an obligation to carry out under the law in supervision and regulation, and we’re doing that. That’s what we’re doing. The committee is not active, so what’s happening is things are coming to the full board and we’re voting on them. We’re getting our business done. You know, we got the stress tests done. We’ve looked at a—you know, a number of proposals for mergers and things like that. So we are—we’re working ahead. Of course, we don’t have a vice chair for supervision, as you mentioned, but we’re making do with the situation we have and a good number of things have come straight to the board for approval.Q: Hi, Chair Powell. It’s Neil Irwin at Axios. Thanks for taking our questions. In the Statement (sic; Summary) of Economic Projections we see a forecast of median 1.9 percent fed-funds rate at the end of the year, 2.8 end of next year. Wonder whether that aligns with your own expectations, in particular on that point of overshooting the long-term neutral rate, and also if you can tell us anything about how that may be paced—frontloaded, backloaded? How high is the bar for doing 50 at one meeting?MR. POWELL: So I don’t—Neil, I’ve never talked about my own SEP projection. It’s in there, but you know, I think Fed chairs have generally not done that because—we just haven’t done it. It’s because we’re—you know, we’re—we have to put together the consensus on the committee and present that consensus. So I wouldn’t talk about my individual one.And in terms of the pacing of it, I would just point out that that is—there’s seven remaining meetings this year. This isn’t something we discuss or debate or agree on, but there’s seven remaining meetings and there’s seven rate hikes. I would add there’s also the shrinkage of the balance sheet, which—people do the math different ways, but that might be the equivalent of another rate increase just from the runoff of the balance sheet. So I don’t—but I don’t know—we haven’t made any decisions on front-end loading or going steadily through the year.And as I mentioned, you know, if you look at the SEP, a good number of participants do see more than seven rate increases this year. And I can’t give you—I’m not going to try to give you a really specific test for what it would be take to do that, but I will say this, though. We’ll be looking at the—at the data as they come in. We’ll be looking to see whether the data show expected improvement on inflation. We’ll be looking at the inflation outlook and making a judgment. And we’ll be going—each meeting is a live meeting, and if we conclude that it would be appropriate to raise interest rates more quickly then we’ll do so.Q: Yeah. Thank you, Chair Powell. Thank you, Michelle, for the question. I have a more basic question. The last time the CPI inflation—I know you look at PCE, but CPI inflation was at high as it is was July of 1981, when the effective federal-funds rate was 19.2 percent. But given the current data, how far behind the curve of inflation do you believe the Federal Reserve is, in your mind?MR. POWELL: So I just would say a couple things. We have the tools that we need and we’re going to use them. And as you can see, we have a plan over the course of this year to raise interest rates steadily and also to run off the balance sheet. We will take the necessary steps to ensure that high inflation does not become entrenched while also supporting a strong labor market. And as I mentioned, if we conclude that it would be appropriate to move more quickly, we’ll do so.I’ll leave it to others to make—to make the judgment you asked for.Q: And just as a follow on that, I wanted to get you on the record on this. What impact has there been on your job, given the fact that — (audio break).MR. POWELL: We lost you in the middle of the question.(Pause.)Q: (In progress following audio break)—the impact that—given you’re not actually confirmed and Governor Brainard is not actually confirmed, has there been any impact on your job or the Fed’s ability to handle inflation?MR. POWELL: None whatsoever.Q: Thank you, Michelle. Chair Powell, how concerned is the committee about the notable pickup in services inflation, which is perhaps less likely to self-correct? And to what extent does it alter both the committee’s confidence that long-term inflation expectations will not de-anchor in the coming months as well as the balance of risk that the Fed may need to raise interest rates further above neutral than indicated in the dot plot? Thank you.MR. POWELL: Thank you. So, of course, that’s something we’re watching report by report, and we’re certainly—we noticed it in the last meeting and it’s part of the overall picture. We have expected services inflation to move back up to where it was, and that’s—part of what’s happening is, in the case of some services, prices are still getting back up to where they were before the—before the crisis. In other cases, it’s pretty clear that inflation has spread more broadly across services. And yes, that is concerning.In the meanwhile, we see some progress on the goods side, but really at this—in this latest report it was confined to vehicles, which is, admittedly, a large category. So, you know, as I mentioned, the committee acutely feels its obligation to move to make sure that we restore price stability and is determined to use its tools to do so.Q: Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I wonder if you could help me understand the kind of logic, if there is one inside the SEP here. As I look at the median forecast, for example, for unemployment it runs for the three-year window below the long-run rate. I look at inflation being above over the three-year window the long-run or call it the neutral rate, so the economy still runs hot. And that is all true in a regime when you run at least for two years the funds rate above the long-run rate. I guess my question is this: Are you not—give a forecast here that, essentially, suggests you will be continuing to run further behind the curve and never really get in front of inflation because the economy will continue to run hot?And kind of on a related issue, you said earlier inflation will take longer to return to price stability than we had originally expected. Isn’t that a choice you’re making? And, if so, why are you making that choice to let inflation run above price stability longer than you’d like?MR. POWELL: Right. So if you look, our—first of all, there is no—you’re looking at medians. But understand that there’s no—it’s not something we voted on. It’s not a plan. But if you look, people do have their—by the end of this year, broadly, people are at or close to or, in some cases, above their estimates of longer-run neutral interest rate. OK. So that should stop pushing—that should—in other words, that should be a removal of accommodation for monetary policy, basically. At the same time, we will have done significant balance sheet runoff and you can think of that as further.In the next year, and just looking at the median, you’re now above the—you know, above the—what people estimate to be the longer-run median so—and also in many people’s forecasts that actually amounts to, you know, tight policy under—in real rates as well.So why does unemployment remain at 3.5 percent? You know, it—I mean, a couple points. One is the connection between—in the economy we had before the pandemic the connection between inflation and the level of the unemployment rate was not very tight. But this is—clearly, what this is is an expectation that, really, it amounts to that the idea that wage increases, which are now running above the level that would be consistent over the long run with 2 percent inflation will move back down to levels which are still very attractive full economy kind of—full employment kind of wages, but not to a point where they’re pushing up inflation anymore.And as I mentioned, there are a lot of factors causing inflation to come down and, you know, the reality is there are many, many moving pieces and we don’t know what will actually happen. But no matter what happens, this is a committee that is determined to use its tools to make sure that higher inflation does not become entrenched, and so we are determined on that front and we’ll deal with what comes. This is—this is a modal or most likely expectation, but we will—we’ll deal with what comes whether it’s better or worse.Q: Hi. Thank you. Well, let me follow up a bit on that. I mean, there are a lot of economists skeptical that you can reduce inflation as much as you’ve penciled in without raising the unemployment rate, and I’m wondering just what are the mechanisms you see in reducing demand. I mean, outside housing and autos, how do higher Fed rates reduce consumer demand unless it’s through higher unemployment? Thank you.MR. POWELL: Well, if you take a look at today’s labor market, what you have is 1.7-plus job openings for every unemployed person. So that’s a very, very tight labor market, tight to an unhealthy level, I would say.So, in principle, if you were—let’s say that our tools work about as you described and the idea is we’re trying to better align demand and supply, let’s just say, in the labor market. So it would actually—if you were just moving down the number of job openings so that they were more like one to one you would have less upward pressure on wages. You would have a lot less of a labor shortage, which is going on pretty much across the economy. We’re hearing from companies that they can’t hire enough people. They’re having a hard time hiring.So that’s, really, the thinking there. You know, these are fairly well understood channels, interest sensitive, and, basically, across the economy we’d like to slow demand so that it’s better aligned with supply. Give supply, at the same time, time to recover and get into a better—you know, a better alignment of supply and demand and that, over time, should bring inflation down.And I’ll say again, though, you know, we don’t have a perfect crystal ball about the future and we’re prepared to use our tools as needed to restore price stability. You know, as I mentioned in my opening remarks, without price stability you really can’t have a sustained period of maximum employment. It’s our—one of our most fundamental obligations is to maintain and restore, in this case, price stability.So we’re very committed to that. Of course, the plan is to restore price stability while also sustaining a strong labor market. That is our intention and we believe we can do that. But we have to restore price stability.Q: Thanks, and I apologize if this covers some of the same ground you just talked about, Mr. Chair. I think I missed some of your answer there. But I have a follow-up question on the labor force. We have seen some gains in the prime age workforce in the last few months. I wonder what you anticipate when it comes to some of the older workers as the health outlook has changed. Are we going to see more recent retirees following Tom Brady back into the workforce and what would that mean for wages and inflation?MR. POWELL: It’s hard to say. You know, the—what we saw in the last cycle was that over the course of a long, steady expansion, labor-force participation outperformed expectations and that was just a—you know, it was a tight labor market that wasn’t—it was nowhere near as tight as this labor market.But it was a tight labor market and so people stayed in the labor force longer. It wasn’t so much people coming back in the labor force after retirement. That’s not something that happens in the aggregate very much. But so that’s what was happening. And, you know, more labor-force participation is tremendously welcome and, of course, our policy does not in any way preclude that.This is a situation where wages have moved up at the highest rate in a very long time and people are able to quit their jobs and move to better paying jobs in the same industry or different industries. So it’s a really attractive labor market for people, and once—you know, as we get past Covid well and truly it becomes an even more attractive one.So we hope that that will lead to more labor supply. That’s a good thing for the country, it’s a good thing for people, and it also will, we think, help relieve some of the wage pressures that do put inflation more at risk. That last part is—we’ll have to see whether empirically it winds up—works out that way. But, in principle, it ought to help with inflation as well. It’s not the only thing we’re looking for, though, from inflation. We’re looking for help from another different—a number of different places and, most importantly, from our own policy.Q: Thank you, Michelle. And thank you, Chair Powell. I’m sorry. I’m having some communication problems so I missed some of the stuff you’ve said and my apologies if this has been asked. Since the FOMC met last January, financial conditions have tightened markedly—equity prices down, Treasury yields up, bond spreads risen, yield curve has flattened a lot and even further today, dollar is up. Is that welcome? And would you like to see more in order to achieve your goals? Thank you.MR. POWELL: So, as you know, policy works through financial conditions. That’s how it reaches the real economy by just the mechanisms you mentioned, and remember that the financial conditions we had for the last couple of years were a function not only of a very aggressive, and appropriately so, fiscal policy but also highly accommodative monetary policy—the monetary policy settings that we put in place at the worst parts of the pandemic.So it is very appropriate to move away from those. And, yes, that will lead to some tightening of financial conditions in the form of higher interest rates and just the sorts of things. We’re not targeting any one or more of those things, but financial conditions generally should move to a more normal level so that we—because we know the economy no longer needs or wants these very highly accommodative stances which, you know. So it’s time to move to a more normal setting of financial conditions. And we do that by moving monetary policy itself to more normal levels.Q: When you say move to a more normal setting for financial conditions, that suggests to me that you want financial conditions to tighten further from where we are now. Am I drawing the right inference from that?MR. POWELL: Well, yes. So I would say we look at a broad range of financial conditions. And of course when we tighten monetary policy we do expect that they will adjust in sync over time with monetary policy. It’s not any particular financial condition, but a broad range of financial conditions. They will reflect, to some extent—they reflect any number of things. But, yes, we need our policy to transmit to the real economy. And it does through financial conditions. Which means as we tighten policy or remove accommodation so that it’s at least less accommodative, that broader financial conditions will also be less accommodative.Q: Hi, Chair Powell. I wanted to ask about the balance sheet discussion you’ve had at this meeting. Can you give us any more details? Did you discuss whether to cap runoffs and whether to increase those caps, over what period? If there were any details.MR. POWELL: Yes. Thank you for asking. So at our meeting today and yesterday we made excellent progress toward agreeing on the parameters of a plan to shrink the balance sheet. And I’d say we’re now in a position to finalize and implement that plan so that we’re actually beginning runoff at a coming meeting. And that could come as soon as our next meeting in May. That’s not a decision that we’ve made, but I would say that that’s how well our discussions went in the last two days. So a couple things just to add, we’ll be mindful of the broader financial and economic context when we made the decision on timing. And we always want to use our tools to support macroeconomic and financial stability. We want to avoid adding uncertainty to what’s a highly uncertain situation already. So all of that will go into the thinking of the timing around this.In terms of the—I would say this, I don’t want to get too much into the details because we’re literally just finalizing them, but the framework is going to look very familiar to people who are familiar with the last—the last time we did this. But it’ll be faster than the last time and, of course, it’s much sooner in a cycle than last time. But it will look—it will look familiar to you. And I would also say that there’ll be—I’m sure there’ll be a more detailed discussion of our—of our—in the minutes to our meeting that come out in three weeks, where I expect we’ll lay out, you know, pretty much the parameters of what we’re looking at, which I think will look quite familiar.Q: Mr. Chairman, since September of 2020 you’ve been operating on a monetary policy framework that let the economy run hot to bring unemployment down. That seems to be over, but I’m wondering how you would describe your reaction function now? What is it that the Fed is trying to do, other than bring inflation down? In other words, is it we’re going to keep raising rates until it comes down to an acceptable level?MR. POWELL: Yeah, so I want to clear one thing up again. And that is that nothing in our—in our new framework or in the changes that we made has caused us to wait longer to raise interest rates. What we said in the framework changes was—and this was really a reflection of what had happened for the proceeding couple of decades, actually. What we said was: If we see, you know, low unemployment, high employment, but we don’t see inflation then we’re not going to raise rates until we actually see inflation. That’s what we said, and that was the sense of it.There was no sense in which if we got a burst of really high inflation, we would wait to raise rates. That’s simply not in the framework. In fact, quite the contrary. The framework is all about anchoring inflation expectations at 2 percent. So I do hear this, you know, that the framework—and really, we can’t blame the framework. It was a sudden, unexpected burst of inflation, and then it was the reaction to it, and it was what it was. But it was not in any way caused or related—caused by or related to the framework.So come to today, you know, I think our vision on this on the committee is very, very clear. What we see is a strong labor market. We see a labor market with a lot of momentum, great job creation, and we see the underlying economy strong, balance sheets are strong. Yes, there are threats to growth from—you know, from what’s going on in Eastern Europe. And but nonetheless, in the base case there’s a pretty broad expectation of strong growth. But inflation is far above our target.And, you know, the help we’ve been expecting, and other forecasters have been expecting, from supply-side improvement, labor-force participation, bottlenecks, all those things getting better—it hasn’t come. And so we’re looking now to using our tools to restore price stability. And we’re committed to doing that. And you see that, I think, in the summary of economic projections. And you see that in the decision we made. And you’ll continue to see it in the decisions we make going forward.Q: If I could follow up by asking, I guess what you’d call it, is the Paul Volcker question. You don’t think unemployment is going to rise significantly, but if it does, does that temper your desire to keep raising rates?MR. POWELL: Well, the goal, of course, is to restore price stability while also sustaining a strong labor market. We have a dual mandate, and they’re sort of equal. But as I said earlier, you know, price stability is an essential goal. In fact, it’s a precondition really for achieving the kind of labor market that we want, which is a strong and sustained labor market. We saw the benefits of a long expansion, a sustained labor market that pulled people back in. And there were really no imbalances in the economy that threatened the long expansion. It just—the pandemic arrived. It was just a completely exogenous event.So that’s how we’re thinking about it. We, of course, want to achieve, you know, price stability with a strong labor market. But we do understand also that really you can’t have maximum employment for any sustained period without price stability. So we need to focus on price stability, and particularly because the labor market is so strong and the economy is so strong. We feel like the economy can handle tighter monetary policy.Q: Hi, Chair Powell. Hopefully, no tech issues here on this front. I wanted to ask just kind of the broad question about how you are communicating what the Fed’s doing here today to the average American, who might not be reading the dot plots or understanding what the SEP is. How is the 25-basis-point hike today and then the signaling on future Fed policy going to address the inflation that they’re feeling at the stores on a daily basis?MR. POWELL: Sure. So I guess I’d start by just assuring everyone that we’re fully committed to bringing inflation back down and also sustaining the economic expansion. We do understand that these higher prices, no matter what the source, have real effects on people’s well-being. And really, high inflation takes a toll on everyone, but it’s really especially on people who use most of their income to buy essentials like food, housing, and transportation, where—I mean, we’ve all seen charts that show if you’re a middle-income person, you’ve got room to absorb some inflation. If you’re at the lower end of the income spectrum, it’s very hard because you’re spending most of your money already on necessities, and the price is going up. So but it’s punishing for everyone.So it has been a difficult time for the economy. But we do anticipate that inflation will move back down, as I mentioned earlier. It may take longer than we like, but I’m confident that we’ll use our tools to bring inflation down. And you ask about rates, so the way that works, I would explain, is that as we raise interest rates, that should gradually slow down demand for the interest-sensitive parts of the economy. And so what we would see is demand slowing down, but just enough so that it’s better matched with supply. And that brings—that will bring inflation down over time. That’s our plan.Q: Hi, Chair Powell. Thank you so much for taking my questions and doing this today. My question is a follow-up to what Brian just asked. What is your message to consumers out there who can no longer afford the basics, due to this high inflation?MR. POWELL: Well, that is the—yes, indeed. As I just said, you know, I think we do understand very much, and we very much take to heart that it’s our obligation to restore price stability. And, you know, we’ve had price stability for a very long time, and maybe come to take it for granted. But now we see the pain. I’m old enough to remember what very high inflation was like. And, you know, we’re strongly committed as a committee to not allowing this higher inflation to become entrenched and to use our tools to bring inflation back down to more normal levels, which our target is 2 percent inflation.So we will—we will do that. And I just would want people to understand that. And that’s—but the way we do that is by raising interest rates and by shrinking our balance sheet. And so financial conditions will become, at the margin, less supportive of various kinds of economic activity. That will slow the economy, while also allowing the labor market to remain very strong. And, you know, the good news is the economy and the labor market are quite strong, and that means the economy, we think, can handle interest rate increases.Q: And as a quick follow-up to that, you know, obviously the Federal Reserve walking this very complicated, fine line of trying to avoid a recession. For the consumers out there who are worried about their jobs in a possible recession, what do you say to that?MR. POWELL: Well, you know, I say that our intention is to bring inflation back down to 2 percent while still sustaining a strong labor market. And that the economy’s very strong. If you look at where forecasts are, you—people are forecasting growth that’s strong within the context of U.S. potential economic output. So and we expect that to continue. And to the extent the data come in different, then, of course, our policy will adapt. But we do believe that our policy is the appropriate one for this forecast. And we believe that we can bring down inflation. We believe that we can do so while sustaining a strong labor market.The labor market is—it’s not strong in the ordinary sense of the world. We haven’t—word—we have not seen a labor market where there were 1.7 job opening for every unemployed person, or where if you add—if you add job openings to those who are employed, that’s actually substantially a larger number than the size of the workforce—than the number of people who actually count themselves as in the workforce. So this is a situation where demand is higher than supply. And when that happens, prices go up. And so we need to use our tools to move supply and demand back. And we don’t—we don’t think we need to do this alone. There will be other factors helping that happen. But we certainly are prepared to use our tools, and we will.Q: Thank you, Michelle. Thank you, Chair Powell. Sorry to take you away from inflation for one minute. May I ask about the sanctions on Russia, and specifically the freezing of the central bank assets. Of course, that raises a similar risk for other sovereigns around the world, and their biggest companies potentially. Any concerns about, in the long term, how this might affect the dollar’s status as the pre-eminent global reserve currency? And in the past couple of weeks have you had to deliver any kinds of reassurance to other central bankers around the world?MR. POWELL: Well, so, of course central bankers around the world are generally very in favor of these sanctions. But let me say this, sanctions are really the business of the elected government. And that’s true everywhere. So the administration, the Treasury Department in particular, and other agencies, they create these sanctions. We’re there to provide technical expertise, but they’re not—it’s not our decisions. And so I’m reluctant to comment on sanctions really much because, again, they’re not for us. We have a very specific mandate, and these are—these are really the province of elected governments, as I mentioned. So I’d have to leave it at that. Sorry.Q: Hi, Chair Powell. Thanks for taking the question. You’ve been talking a lot about raising wages, which on the one hand is a great thing. But are we possibly seeing the beginning of a wage price spiral?MR. POWELL: So the way I would say it is this: We—first of all, I would agree with the premise that wages moving up is a great thing. You know, that’s how the standard of living rises over time. And generally it’s driven over long periods by rising productivity. But what we have now, if you look at these—the wage increases that we have—we look at a—we’re blessed with a range of measures of wages that all measure different things. But right now they’re all showing the same thing, which is that the increases—not the levels, but the increases are running at levels that are well above what would be consistent with 2 percent inflation—our goal—over time. And that may be—we don’t know how persistent that phenomenon will be. It’s very hard to say.And that’s really, I think, the sense of your question about a wage price spiral, is, is that something that’s going to start happening and become entrenched in the system? We don’t—we don’t see that. You can see, for example, in some sectors that got very high wage increases early on, those wage increases looked like they may have slowed down to a normal level. But it’s—it comes back to, you know, what I’m saying here, which is there is—there is a misalignment of demand and supply, particularly in the labor market, and that is leading to wages moving up at ways that are—that are not consistent with 2 percent inflation over time. And so we need to use our tools to, you know, guide inflation back down to 2 percent, and that would be in the context of an extraordinarily strong labor market.We think this labor market can handle, as I mentioned, tighter monetary policy, and the overall economy can as well. But, yes, wages are moving up faster than is consistent with 2 percent inflation, but—it’s good to see them moving up, but it wouldn’t be sustainable over too long of a period to see them moving up that much higher. And that’s because of this misalignment between supply and demand. We expect to get more labor supply. We did last time. We got more than we expected last—during the last cycle. This time we’ve gotten much less than expected, so it’s not easy to predict these things. But we do expect that we’ll get people coming back in the labor market, particularly as Covid becomes less and less of a factor in many people’s lives—something we all wish. So that’s how we think about it.Q: Hi, Chair Powell. I think you said at the Senate earlier this month that in hindsight the Fed should have moved earlier, and it sounds like today that you don’t think that the Fed is late, and I just wanted to get your clarification on that. And if it is—if you still think that the Fed is behind the curve, how much behind the curve is it?MR. POWELL: Right. So we are—we are not—we don’t have the luxury of 20/20 hindsight in actually implementing real-time decisions in the world. So the—you know, so the question is—the right question is: Did you make the right decisions based on what you knew at the time? But that’s not the question I was answering, which is: Knowing what you know now. So I think if we knew now—of course, if we knew now that these supply blockages really and the inflation resulting from them in collision with, you know, very strong demand—if we knew that that was what was going to happen, then in hindsight, yes, it would have been appropriate to move earlier. Obviously, it would be. But again, we don’t—we don’t have that luxury. And then so—but that’s a separate question from your other question, which is behind the curve.And you know, I don’t have the luxury of looking at it that way. You know, we are—we are—we have our tools, powerful tools, and the committee is very focused on using them. We’re acutely aware of the need to restore price stability while keeping a strong labor market. And what I saw today was a committee that is—that is strongly committed to achieving price stability in particular and prepared to use our tools to do that.We’re not going to let high inflation become entrenched. The costs of that would be too high and we’re not going to wait so long that we have to do that. No one wants—no one wants to have to really put restrictive monetary policy on in order to get inflation back down. So, frankly, the need is one of getting back up—getting rates back up to more neutral levels as quickly as we practicably can and then moving beyond that if that turns out to be appropriate. And as you can see, it is appropriate in the—in the sense—to people’s SEPs, they do write down levels of interest rates that are above their estimate of the longer-run neutral rate. And there’s also a range of estimates, too, as you will see if you look at the details of the SEP.But thanks for your question.STAFF: OK. Thank you all. Thanks, Mr. Chair.MR. POWELL: Thank you.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":145,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9032439721,"gmtCreate":1647418970866,"gmtModify":1676534227519,"author":{"id":"3568542354994015","authorId":"3568542354994015","name":"咩咩虎","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a6663bef57eca539a2c52ea184964654","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9032439721","repostId":"2219544247","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2219544247","pubTimestamp":1647415347,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2219544247?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-03-16 15:22","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Tesla Stops Work at Shanghai Factory for Two Days Amid China COVID Curbs - Internal Notice","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2219544247","media":"Reuters","summary":"SHANGHAI (Reuters) - Electric vehicle giant Tesla is suspending production at its Shanghai factory f","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>SHANGHAI (Reuters) - Electric vehicle giant Tesla is suspending production at its Shanghai factory for two days, according to a notice sent internally and to suppliers, as China tightens COVID restrictions to curb the country&#39;s latest outbreak.</p><p>The Shanghai factory runs around the clock and suppliers and Tesla staff were told on Wednesday in the notice, reviewed by Reuters, that production would be suspended for Wednesday and Thursday.</p><p>It did not give a reason for the stoppage at the plant, also known as the Gigafactory 3, which makes the Tesla Model 3 sedan and the Model Y crossover sport utility vehicle.</p><p>Many cities across China, including Shanghai, have been carrying out mass testing and have cordoned off apartment and office buildings in a bid to stem the country&#39;s largest outbreak in two years. The measures have also caused factory shutdowns in parts of the country, putting pressure on supply chains.</p><p>Tesla did not have immediate comment.</p><p>Tesla&#39;s Shanghai factory produces cars for the China market and is also a crucial export hub to markets such as Germany and Japan. It delivered 56,515 vehicles in February, including 33,315 for export, according to the China Passenger Car Association.</p><p>That amounts to an average of around 2,018 vehicles a day.</p><p>It was not immediately clear whether the suspension of work would apply to other plant operations over the two days.</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TWOA.U\">Two</a> people briefed on the notice said they understood it applied to Tesla&#39;s general assembly lines. They declined to be identified because the information was not public.</p><p>The notice did not specify whether the measures would correspond to a loss of production, or whether Tesla could make up for any lost output when it restarts operations.</p></body></html>","source":"yahoofinance","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Tesla Stops Work at Shanghai Factory for Two Days Amid China COVID Curbs - Internal Notice</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTesla Stops Work at Shanghai Factory for Two Days Amid China COVID Curbs - Internal Notice\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-03-16 15:22 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/exclusive-tesla-stops-shanghai-factory-065427762.html><strong>Reuters</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>SHANGHAI (Reuters) - Electric vehicle giant Tesla is suspending production at its Shanghai factory for two days, according to a notice sent internally and to suppliers, as China tightens COVID ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/exclusive-tesla-stops-shanghai-factory-065427762.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BK4574":"无人驾驶","BK4548":"巴美列捷福持仓","BK4551":"寇图资本持仓","BK4527":"明星科技股","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","BK4581":"高盛持仓","BK4555":"新能源车","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓","BK4099":"汽车制造商","BK4533":"AQR资本管理(全球第二大对冲基金)","TSLA":"特斯拉","BK4511":"特斯拉概念","BK4124":"机动车零配件与设备"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/exclusive-tesla-stops-shanghai-factory-065427762.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5f26f4a48f9cb3e29be4d71d3ba8c038","article_id":"2219544247","content_text":"SHANGHAI (Reuters) - Electric vehicle giant Tesla is suspending production at its Shanghai factory for two days, according to a notice sent internally and to suppliers, as China tightens COVID restrictions to curb the country's latest outbreak.The Shanghai factory runs around the clock and suppliers and Tesla staff were told on Wednesday in the notice, reviewed by Reuters, that production would be suspended for Wednesday and Thursday.It did not give a reason for the stoppage at the plant, also known as the Gigafactory 3, which makes the Tesla Model 3 sedan and the Model Y crossover sport utility vehicle.Many cities across China, including Shanghai, have been carrying out mass testing and have cordoned off apartment and office buildings in a bid to stem the country's largest outbreak in two years. The measures have also caused factory shutdowns in parts of the country, putting pressure on supply chains.Tesla did not have immediate comment.Tesla's Shanghai factory produces cars for the China market and is also a crucial export hub to markets such as Germany and Japan. It delivered 56,515 vehicles in February, including 33,315 for export, according to the China Passenger Car Association.That amounts to an average of around 2,018 vehicles a day.It was not immediately clear whether the suspension of work would apply to other plant operations over the two days.Two people briefed on the notice said they understood it applied to Tesla's general assembly lines. They declined to be identified because the information was not public.The notice did not specify whether the measures would correspond to a loss of production, or whether Tesla could make up for any lost output when it restarts operations.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":126,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[],"lives":[]}