ColeHii personal page - To The Moon

ColeHii

No personal profile

62Follow

39Followers

0Topic

0Badge

2023-03-08

👍

3 Stocks to Buy That Could Be the Next Trillion-Dollar Company

2023-01-23

👍

Alibaba: Ryan Cohen Is Right

2023-01-12

👍

Wall St Ends Sharply Higher on Optimism Before Key Inflation Report

2023-01-08

👍

Earnings Season Will Test the Market’s Great Start

2023-01-06

👍

The Many Forces Fueling Tesla’s $860 Billion Tumble

2023-01-05

👍

Down Over 20% In 2022, These 3 Warren Buffett Stocks Are Smart Buys in 2023

2023-01-04

👍

Fed Minutes to Reveal Source of Inflation Angst Pushing Up Rates

2023-01-03

👍

2022 Recap: Futures Market Performance

2023-01-02

👍

New Year's Market Closing, Jobs Data, Fed Minutes, and More for Investors to Watch This Week

2023-01-01

🎉

Reminder: U.S. Market Closed for New Year's Day on Monday, Jan. 2, 2023

2022-12-30

👍

2 No-Brainer Warren Buffett Stocks to Buy Hand Over Fist for 2023

2022-12-29

👍

2023 U.S. Stock Market Predictions: What Will Happen?

2022-12-28

👍

6 Numbers that Defined 2022

2022-12-27

👍

Apple Down 25%, Meta 65%, Amazon 49% As Tech Stocks Hit Rough Patch In 2022: 4 Factors That Could Work In Sector's Favor In 2023

2022-12-26

👍

Tesla's Crash Could Signal A New Bull Market

2022-12-25

👍

Reminder: U.S. Market Will be Closed for Christmas Day on Monday, 26 December 2022

2022-12-24

👍

Reminder: U.S. Market Will be Closed for Christmas Day on Monday, 26 December 2022

2022-12-23

👍

3 Stocks to Buy Before They Surge in 2023

2022-12-22

👍

Is a 2023 Stock-Market Rebound in Store After 2022 Selloff?

2022-12-21

👍

Tesla Is Now Worth Less Than Exxon As Stock Plunges Toward Worst Month, Quarter and Year in History

Go to Tiger App to see more news

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"userPageInfo":{"id":3569303342488537,"uuid":"3569303342488537","gmtCreate":1624083232552,"gmtModify":1624083232552,"name":"ColeHii","pinyin":"colehii","introduction":"","introductionEn":"","signature":"","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":39,"headSize":62,"tweetSize":451,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":1,"name":"萌萌虎","nameTw":"萌萌虎","represent":"呱呱坠地","factor":"评论帖子3次或发布1条主帖（非转发）","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":"success","userBadges":[{"badgeId":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493-2","templateUuid":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493","name":"Senior Tiger","description":"Join the tiger community for 1000 days","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0063fb68ea29c9ae6858c58630e182d5","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/96c699a93be4214d4b49aea6a5a5d1a4","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/35b0e542a9ff77046ed69ef602bc105d","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2024.03.16","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84-1","templateUuid":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84","name":"Real Trader","description":"Completed a transaction","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":1,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":2,"currentWearingBadge":{"badgeId":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84-1","templateUuid":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84","name":"Real Trader","description":"Completed a transaction","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":1,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100},"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"location":null,"starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"post","tweets":[{"id":9949908039,"gmtCreate":1678279284622,"gmtModify":1678279287831,"author":{"id":"3569303342488537","authorId":"3569303342488537","name":"ColeHii","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":1},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👍","listText":"👍","text":"👍","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":15,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9949908039","repostId":"1109123037","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1109123037","pubTimestamp":1678289407,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1109123037?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2023-03-08 23:30","market":"us","language":"en","title":"3 Stocks to Buy That Could Be the Next Trillion-Dollar Company","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1109123037","media":"InvestorPlace","summary":"What will be the next trillion-dollar company? A few companies jump out on the list.Nvidia(NVDA) nea","content":"<html><head></head><body><ul><li>What will be the next trillion-dollar company? A few companies jump out on the list.</li><li><b>Nvidia</b>(NVDA) neared this mark during the peak of the last cycle and thanks to its positioning in new market trends, will likely get there on the next bull cycle.</li><li><b>Tesla</b>(TSLA) was in the trillion-dollar club once before and can likely get there again.</li><li><b>Berkshire Hathaway</b>(<b><u>BRK.B</u></b>, <b><u>BRK.A</u></b>) is the slow-and-steady pick and it’s that far away now, currently commanding a $700 billion valuation.</li></ul><p>The bear market has been punishing for stocks, crushing hopes and dolling out major losses. While many companies have held up okay, others continue to struggle. It makes investors wonder when we’ll see the next trillion-dollar company.</p><p>It wasn’t that long ago that a trillion-dollar market capitalization seemed unreachable. But before long, <b>Apple</b>(NASDAQ: <b>AAPL</b>) grazed a $3 trillion market cap. Then the whole market went south and the bear market really began to growl.</p><p>In any regard, the steep decline has many investors wondering what the next trillion-dollar company is and when we’ll see it.</p><p>There’s no way to know for sure — particularly on the “when” part of the equation — but here are the stocks that seem most likely to get there.</p><p><b>Nvidia (NVDA)</b></p><p><b>Nvidia</b>(NASDAQ: <b>NVDA</b>) was not all that far away from a $1 trillion market cap. At one point in December 2021, the company had a valuation north of $800 billion. It would have taken about a 20% rally for Nvidia to get there in the prior cycle.</p><p>While the stock went on to lose two-thirds of its value from peak to trough, it’s been on a robust rally since. Shares have rallied more than 100% off the recent low as investors continue to pile in.</p><p>Part of it seems like momentum driving the action, while some of it feels like “FOMO,” as investors fear missing out on the “next big stock” and the AI revolution, which Nvidia is helping to drive.</p><p>Because of its role in current technology, the company should continue to do quite well. The way CEO Jensen Huang positions the company in future technology trends <i>before</i> they become hot is why Nvidia has the potential to be one of the next trillion-dollar companies.</p><p><b>Tesla (TSLA)</b></p><p><b>Tesla</b>(NASDAQ: <b>TSLA</b>) is an easy and obvious name when looking for the next trillion-dollar company. Tesla should be on everyone’s list for the potential to hit this milestone, given that it has already done so before.</p><p>In 2021, Tesla sported a market cap north of $1.2 trillion. As recently as mid-September, shares were down just 24% from the all-time high. Then things came to an abrupt halt.</p><p>CEO Elon Musk bought Twitter, which only fueled Tesla’s decline as shares fell in five straight months and cratered more than 67% from the August high to the January low. When it finally bottomed near $100, Tesla stock was 75% below its all-time high.</p><p>Should it ever get there again — currently at $414.50 — it will represent a gain of just over 300% from the low.</p><p>While a global recession is the obvious risk, the company’s automotive and energy components continue to drive growth. For example, analysts expect 27% and 31% growth in 2023 and 2024, respectively.</p><p><b>Berkshire Hathaway (BRK-B, BRK-A)</b></p><p>Last but not least, we have <b>Berkshire Hathaway</b>(NYSE: <b><u>BRK-A</u></b>, NYSE: <b><u>BRK-B</u></b>). However, there’re two main risks with this pick as the next trillion-dollar company. That are Warren Buffett and Charlie Munger.</p><p>While those two money managers may be the firm’s biggest assets, there are worries that when they are gone, they will turn into Berkshire’s biggest liabilities.</p><p>However, Buffett and Munger have built Berkshire into a powerhouse, as it has amassed a $700 billion market cap. At its highs, it sported a market cap of $800 billion. I believe Buffett &amp; Co. have built a system that will allow Berkshire to continue flourishing long after they have stepped down.</p><p>That goes for Berkshire’s impressive list of portfolio managers, but also for the company’s impressive investments. As the world continues to push forward, so too will Berkshire’s largest positions (and savvy deals) and eventually, that should tip the company into the trillion-dollar club.</p></body></html>","source":"investorplace","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>3 Stocks to Buy That Could Be the Next Trillion-Dollar Company</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n3 Stocks to Buy That Could Be the Next Trillion-Dollar Company\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2023-03-08 23:30 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://investorplace.com/2023/03/3-stocks-to-buy-that-could-be-the-next-trillion-dollar-company/><strong>InvestorPlace</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>What will be the next trillion-dollar company? A few companies jump out on the list.Nvidia(NVDA) neared this mark during the peak of the last cycle and thanks to its positioning in new market trends, ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://investorplace.com/2023/03/3-stocks-to-buy-that-could-be-the-next-trillion-dollar-company/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉","NVDA":"英伟达","BRK.B":"伯克希尔B","BRK.A":"伯克希尔"},"source_url":"https://investorplace.com/2023/03/3-stocks-to-buy-that-could-be-the-next-trillion-dollar-company/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1109123037","content_text":"What will be the next trillion-dollar company? A few companies jump out on the list.Nvidia(NVDA) neared this mark during the peak of the last cycle and thanks to its positioning in new market trends, will likely get there on the next bull cycle.Tesla(TSLA) was in the trillion-dollar club once before and can likely get there again.Berkshire Hathaway(BRK.B, BRK.A) is the slow-and-steady pick and it’s that far away now, currently commanding a $700 billion valuation.The bear market has been punishing for stocks, crushing hopes and dolling out major losses. While many companies have held up okay, others continue to struggle. It makes investors wonder when we’ll see the next trillion-dollar company.It wasn’t that long ago that a trillion-dollar market capitalization seemed unreachable. But before long, Apple(NASDAQ: AAPL) grazed a $3 trillion market cap. Then the whole market went south and the bear market really began to growl.In any regard, the steep decline has many investors wondering what the next trillion-dollar company is and when we’ll see it.There’s no way to know for sure — particularly on the “when” part of the equation — but here are the stocks that seem most likely to get there.Nvidia (NVDA)Nvidia(NASDAQ: NVDA) was not all that far away from a $1 trillion market cap. At one point in December 2021, the company had a valuation north of $800 billion. It would have taken about a 20% rally for Nvidia to get there in the prior cycle.While the stock went on to lose two-thirds of its value from peak to trough, it’s been on a robust rally since. Shares have rallied more than 100% off the recent low as investors continue to pile in.Part of it seems like momentum driving the action, while some of it feels like “FOMO,” as investors fear missing out on the “next big stock” and the AI revolution, which Nvidia is helping to drive.Because of its role in current technology, the company should continue to do quite well. The way CEO Jensen Huang positions the company in future technology trends before they become hot is why Nvidia has the potential to be one of the next trillion-dollar companies.Tesla (TSLA)Tesla(NASDAQ: TSLA) is an easy and obvious name when looking for the next trillion-dollar company. Tesla should be on everyone’s list for the potential to hit this milestone, given that it has already done so before.In 2021, Tesla sported a market cap north of $1.2 trillion. As recently as mid-September, shares were down just 24% from the all-time high. Then things came to an abrupt halt.CEO Elon Musk bought Twitter, which only fueled Tesla’s decline as shares fell in five straight months and cratered more than 67% from the August high to the January low. When it finally bottomed near $100, Tesla stock was 75% below its all-time high.Should it ever get there again — currently at $414.50 — it will represent a gain of just over 300% from the low.While a global recession is the obvious risk, the company’s automotive and energy components continue to drive growth. For example, analysts expect 27% and 31% growth in 2023 and 2024, respectively.Berkshire Hathaway (BRK-B, BRK-A)Last but not least, we have Berkshire Hathaway(NYSE: BRK-A, NYSE: BRK-B). However, there’re two main risks with this pick as the next trillion-dollar company. That are Warren Buffett and Charlie Munger.While those two money managers may be the firm’s biggest assets, there are worries that when they are gone, they will turn into Berkshire’s biggest liabilities.However, Buffett and Munger have built Berkshire into a powerhouse, as it has amassed a $700 billion market cap. At its highs, it sported a market cap of $800 billion. I believe Buffett & Co. have built a system that will allow Berkshire to continue flourishing long after they have stepped down.That goes for Berkshire’s impressive list of portfolio managers, but also for the company’s impressive investments. As the world continues to push forward, so too will Berkshire’s largest positions (and savvy deals) and eventually, that should tip the company into the trillion-dollar club.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":118,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9952314787,"gmtCreate":1674454308749,"gmtModify":1676538941055,"author":{"id":"3569303342488537","authorId":"3569303342488537","name":"ColeHii","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":1},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👍","listText":"👍","text":"👍","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9952314787","repostId":"2305137769","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2305137769","pubTimestamp":1674446190,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2305137769?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2023-01-23 11:56","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Alibaba: Ryan Cohen Is Right","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2305137769","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"SummaryThe last several weeks have seen news item after news item about Alibaba.The most recent big ","content":"<html><head></head><body><h2>Summary</h2><ul><li>The last several weeks have seen news item after news item about Alibaba.</li><li>The most recent big story was that Ryan Cohen of GameStop fame had taken a position in the stock.</li><li>Some investors worried that Cohen&#39;s buy signalled Alibaba deteriorating to meme stock status.</li><li>A close look at Cohen&#39;s investing history reveals that he has invested successfully in profitable companies, as well as meme stocks.</li><li>In this article, I show why Ryan Cohen is right about Alibaba stock.</li></ul><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/caaaeb7cdfa665bf1550cbf2f7307f8f\" tg-width=\"750\" tg-height=\"499\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Michael Loccisano</span></p><p>Recently, the big <b>Alibaba</b> (NYSE:BABA) news was that Ryan Cohen of GameStop (GME) fame took a position, hoping to encourage more buybacks. Initially, investors on Twitter expressed dismay at the news, joking that BABA had now officially become a meme stock. Indeed, I added a little to this discourse myself, tweeting out the following half-joking comment:</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6cea5369c8e31a455acf8272decaa793\" tg-width=\"830\" tg-height=\"532\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>My post sounds like it is expressing negative sentiment, but wasn&#39;t meant to be taken seriously. I have never been a fan of meme stocks, but I know that Ryan Cohen made big returns on his meme investments by buying early. Therefore, I didn&#39;t take his endorsements as a negative.</p><p>Indeed, Ryan Cohen&#39;s buying could be seen as a positive catalyst. Whatever you think of the meme stocks Cohen is associated with, we know that he is pushing Alibaba to do more buybacks, which could create value for shareholders. There are limits to how effective buybacks can be, but given BABA&#39;s modest valuation, they could really work in this case. Alibaba currently has$29 billion in cash on its balance sheet, and generated$3 billion in free cash flow last quarter. Given that the amount of cash this business throws off, it could easily afford to do $10 billion worth of buybacks each year and not run into any solvency issues.</p><p>So, we&#39;ve got Ryan Cohen advocating a policy that could well work for BABA-indeed, a policy that many BABA shareholders have been wanting for years. BABA has been doing buybacks, but so far it hasn&#39;t come anywhere close to hitting the maximum authorized amount. It looks like there&#39;s room for more, and who knows how long these bargain prices will last. For this reason, I think Ryan Cohen&#39;s investment is a neutral to positive factor for Alibaba, not a negative one.</p><h2>Alibaba - The Buyback Situation Explained</h2><p>Given that Ryan Cohen&#39;s activism at Alibaba consists of pushing for more buybacks, it helps to understand where Alibaba stands with respect to buybacks. The company is known to be doing buybacks this year, why does Cohen want more of them?</p><p>Here&#39;s what we know about Alibaba&#39;s buyback program as it stands now:</p><ul><li><p>The maximum dollar value right now is $25 billion.</p></li><li><p>Last year, the maximum was increased by $15 billion.</p></li><li><p>BABA&#39;s annual free cash flow has varied between $7 billion and $28 billion per year.</p></li><li><p>In the most recent quarter, Alibaba&#39;s management cut enough costs that FCF grew 61% year-over-year.</p></li><li><p>Alibaba bought back $2 billion worth of stock last fiscal year, and $5.2 billion worth in the last six months.</p></li></ul><p>So, it looks like Alibaba has authorized $18 billion more in buybacks than have actually occurred. Why are the buybacks proceeding so slowly?</p><p>It all has to do with the distinction between authorized and actual buybacks. A company may authorize its executives to do buybacks for any number of reasons, a simple awareness that the company can afford buybacks may be enough for them to do so. Actually doing a buyback is a very different story. If a company has $29 billion in cash and $68 billion in liquid assets, like Alibaba does, it can certainly afford a buyback. But if it has a $68 billion M&amp;A opportunity that it thinks it can triple its money on quickly, then that might be a better use of funds than a buyback. It is well known that Alibaba is investing large sums of money into its Cloud business right now, aiming to make it the AWS of China. AWS has been a huge success for <b>Amazon</b> (AMZN), adding $5.4 billion per quarter to the bottom line, so it should come as no surprise that BABA&#39;s management keeps investing in the cloud. It could prove a big winner over the long run, possibly a bigger winner than $18 billion worth of buybacks would be.</p><h2>Why Cohen is Right About Buybacks in Principle</h2><p>If Alibaba&#39;s management thinks that investing in its business is a better use of funds than doing buybacks, I won&#39;t disagree with them. With that said, Ryan Cohen is correct in principle that buybacks would provide value to Alibaba&#39;s shareholders. Generally, when a company is profitable, growing and cheap, buybacks will make it more valuable. With that in mind, here are some key metrics on Alibaba&#39;s valuation, growth and profit that demonstrate its stock is worth buying at today&#39;s price.</p><h2>Valuation</h2><p>Alibaba is cheaper than most tech stocks, and cheaper than the S&amp;P 500. Its key valuation ratios include:</p><ul><li><p>P/E: 15.8.</p></li><li><p>Price/sales: 2.6.</p></li><li><p>Price/book: 2.3.</p></li><li><p>Price/operating cash flow: 14.2.</p></li></ul><p>These multiples are all lower than average. For context, the S&amp;P 500 trades at 20 times earnings and 3.7 times book value. So, we&#39;ve got Alibaba trading for less than a typical U.S. stock here. Sounds good, but is Alibaba growing? Let&#39;s take a look.</p><h2>Growth</h2><p>Alibaba&#39;s revenue growth has slowed considerably thanks to China&#39;s zero COVID policy. With lockdowns crushing demand, its trailing 12 month revenue growth slipped to 5.5%. However, the company cut costs, resulting in the following growth rates in the most recent quarter:</p><ul><li><p>Operating income: up 68%.</p></li><li><p>Free cash flow: up 61%.</p></li><li><p>Adjusted net income: up 19%.</p></li></ul><p>Pretty strong growth observed here. Obviously, growth from cost cuts tends to be a one-time affair, but now that China&#39;s Zero COVID policy is officially over, we could see the top-line growth return.</p><h2>Profitability</h2><p>Finally, we have profitability. Alibaba has always been a very profitable company, boasting the following profit metrics for the trailing 12 month period:</p><ul><li><p>Gross profit margin: 36%.</p></li><li><p>EBIT margin: 11.2%.</p></li><li><p>FCF margin: 6%.</p></li><li><p>Net margin: 1.6%.</p></li></ul><p>Obviously, the net margin is a bit weaker than the other metrics, but remember that Alibaba owns a stock portfolio that has been holding back GAAP net income recently. Swap out GAAP net income for adjusted net income and that figure swells to about 10%.</p><h2>Ryan Cohen&#39;s Track Record</h2><p>Having demonstrated that Alibaba is a cheap, profitable, and fast growing company, it&#39;s now time to look at who has been buying it.</p><p>Ryan Cohen is the most famous person to invest in Alibaba recently. Best known for his involvement in meme stocks, Cohen&#39;s name doesn&#39;t necessarily inspire a huge amount of confidence.</p><p>However, after doing some research, I determined that Ryan Cohen&#39;s investing track record is very good. Here&#39;s what we know about Cohen&#39;s investments:</p><ul><li><p>He got his start by founding and growing the company Chewy. He sold it for $3.5 billion.</p></li><li><p>He immediately invested the sales proceeds into <b>Apple</b> (AAPL) at $38.25 and <b>Wells Fargo</b> (WFC) at $46.</p></li><li><p>He achieved a 255% return on Apple and a mildly positive return on WFC if you include dividends.</p></li><li><p>He invested in <b>GameStop</b> (GME) and is sitting on an 890% return.</p></li><li><p>He bought <b>Bed Bath &amp;Beyond</b> (BBBY) and sold at a 56.3% return.</p></li></ul><p>Below is a table showing Ryan Cohen&#39;s recent investment results. As you can see, he doesn&#39;t have a single loser in his portfolio.</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Investment</p></td><td><p>Cohen&#39;s buy price</p></td><td><p>Cohen&#39;s sell price</p></td><td><p>Return</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>AAPL</p></td><td><p>$38.25</p></td><td><p>No sale (currently $136)</p></td><td><p>255%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>WFC</p></td><td><p>$46</p></td><td><p>No known sale (currently $43.5)</p></td><td><p>10.3%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>GME</p></td><td><p>$2.1</p></td><td><p>$20.79</p></td><td><p>890%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>BBBY</p></td><td><p>$15.56</p></td><td><p>$24.33</p></td><td><p>56.3%</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>A note on how I calculated Cohen&#39;s Wells Fargo return:</p><p>WFC stock has paid $7.26 in dividends since the first half of 2017. The stock has declined from $46 to $43.5. Therefore, we have a positive $4.26 return ($7.26 in dividends minus $2.5 in capital losses) for a percentage return of 10.3%, assuming no reinvestment.</p><p>So, basically, Ryan Cohen is up on all of his investments since selling Chewy. His involvement in meme stocks may give off bad optics, but remember that he got into GME extremely early; he was not one of the people calling for the stock to go to $500,000 or anything like that. So, we have evidence of a good capital allocator here. His endorsement of Alibaba is not a negative for current shareholders.</p><h2>The Bottom Line</h2><p>The bottom line on Ryan Cohen&#39;s investment in Alibaba is this:</p><p>It is no thesis-breaker.</p><p>In fact, it&#39;s arguably a slight positive. If you look past the unflattering nature of some of the names Ryan Cohen has bought, you see a capital allocator with a good track record. Cohen got his start buying Apple and Wells Fargo-two value investor favorites-and he made his money on meme stocks by buying long before those stocks entered their speculative mania phase.</p><p>In the meantime, we&#39;ve got Alibaba trading at a cheap valuation, and growing its cash flows at a rapid pace. Who knows whether Cohen&#39;s proposed buybacks are really Alibaba&#39;s <i>best</i> use of funds, but we can say for sure that they wouldn&#39;t hurt.</p><p>Taking everything into consideration, I&#39;m quite comfortable being in Alibaba stock alongside Ryan Cohen. Maybe Cohen will trigger a flurry of buybacks and retail cloners that take the stock to absurd heights, maybe not. My thesis was never based on that outcome anyway. I&#39;d be quite content to see BABA slowly grind up at 20% CAGR over the next three years, which is what I expect to happen.</p><p><i>This article is written by Growth at a Good Price for reference only. Please note the risks.</i></p></body></html>","source":"seekingalpha_fund","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Alibaba: Ryan Cohen Is Right</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAlibaba: Ryan Cohen Is Right\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2023-01-23 11:56 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4571395-alibaba-ryan-cohen-took-position-positive><strong>Seeking Alpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>SummaryThe last several weeks have seen news item after news item about Alibaba.The most recent big story was that Ryan Cohen of GameStop fame had taken a position in the stock.Some investors worried ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4571395-alibaba-ryan-cohen-took-position-positive\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BK4122":"互联网与直销零售","09988":"阿里巴巴-SW","BK4548":"巴美列捷福持仓","BK4585":"ETF&股票定投概念","BABA":"阿里巴巴"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4571395-alibaba-ryan-cohen-took-position-positive","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2305137769","content_text":"SummaryThe last several weeks have seen news item after news item about Alibaba.The most recent big story was that Ryan Cohen of GameStop fame had taken a position in the stock.Some investors worried that Cohen's buy signalled Alibaba deteriorating to meme stock status.A close look at Cohen's investing history reveals that he has invested successfully in profitable companies, as well as meme stocks.In this article, I show why Ryan Cohen is right about Alibaba stock.Michael LoccisanoRecently, the big Alibaba (NYSE:BABA) news was that Ryan Cohen of GameStop (GME) fame took a position, hoping to encourage more buybacks. Initially, investors on Twitter expressed dismay at the news, joking that BABA had now officially become a meme stock. Indeed, I added a little to this discourse myself, tweeting out the following half-joking comment:My post sounds like it is expressing negative sentiment, but wasn't meant to be taken seriously. I have never been a fan of meme stocks, but I know that Ryan Cohen made big returns on his meme investments by buying early. Therefore, I didn't take his endorsements as a negative.Indeed, Ryan Cohen's buying could be seen as a positive catalyst. Whatever you think of the meme stocks Cohen is associated with, we know that he is pushing Alibaba to do more buybacks, which could create value for shareholders. There are limits to how effective buybacks can be, but given BABA's modest valuation, they could really work in this case. Alibaba currently has$29 billion in cash on its balance sheet, and generated$3 billion in free cash flow last quarter. Given that the amount of cash this business throws off, it could easily afford to do $10 billion worth of buybacks each year and not run into any solvency issues.So, we've got Ryan Cohen advocating a policy that could well work for BABA-indeed, a policy that many BABA shareholders have been wanting for years. BABA has been doing buybacks, but so far it hasn't come anywhere close to hitting the maximum authorized amount. It looks like there's room for more, and who knows how long these bargain prices will last. For this reason, I think Ryan Cohen's investment is a neutral to positive factor for Alibaba, not a negative one.Alibaba - The Buyback Situation ExplainedGiven that Ryan Cohen's activism at Alibaba consists of pushing for more buybacks, it helps to understand where Alibaba stands with respect to buybacks. The company is known to be doing buybacks this year, why does Cohen want more of them?Here's what we know about Alibaba's buyback program as it stands now:The maximum dollar value right now is $25 billion.Last year, the maximum was increased by $15 billion.BABA's annual free cash flow has varied between $7 billion and $28 billion per year.In the most recent quarter, Alibaba's management cut enough costs that FCF grew 61% year-over-year.Alibaba bought back $2 billion worth of stock last fiscal year, and $5.2 billion worth in the last six months.So, it looks like Alibaba has authorized $18 billion more in buybacks than have actually occurred. Why are the buybacks proceeding so slowly?It all has to do with the distinction between authorized and actual buybacks. A company may authorize its executives to do buybacks for any number of reasons, a simple awareness that the company can afford buybacks may be enough for them to do so. Actually doing a buyback is a very different story. If a company has $29 billion in cash and $68 billion in liquid assets, like Alibaba does, it can certainly afford a buyback. But if it has a $68 billion M&A opportunity that it thinks it can triple its money on quickly, then that might be a better use of funds than a buyback. It is well known that Alibaba is investing large sums of money into its Cloud business right now, aiming to make it the AWS of China. AWS has been a huge success for Amazon (AMZN), adding $5.4 billion per quarter to the bottom line, so it should come as no surprise that BABA's management keeps investing in the cloud. It could prove a big winner over the long run, possibly a bigger winner than $18 billion worth of buybacks would be.Why Cohen is Right About Buybacks in PrincipleIf Alibaba's management thinks that investing in its business is a better use of funds than doing buybacks, I won't disagree with them. With that said, Ryan Cohen is correct in principle that buybacks would provide value to Alibaba's shareholders. Generally, when a company is profitable, growing and cheap, buybacks will make it more valuable. With that in mind, here are some key metrics on Alibaba's valuation, growth and profit that demonstrate its stock is worth buying at today's price.ValuationAlibaba is cheaper than most tech stocks, and cheaper than the S&P 500. Its key valuation ratios include:P/E: 15.8.Price/sales: 2.6.Price/book: 2.3.Price/operating cash flow: 14.2.These multiples are all lower than average. For context, the S&P 500 trades at 20 times earnings and 3.7 times book value. So, we've got Alibaba trading for less than a typical U.S. stock here. Sounds good, but is Alibaba growing? Let's take a look.GrowthAlibaba's revenue growth has slowed considerably thanks to China's zero COVID policy. With lockdowns crushing demand, its trailing 12 month revenue growth slipped to 5.5%. However, the company cut costs, resulting in the following growth rates in the most recent quarter:Operating income: up 68%.Free cash flow: up 61%.Adjusted net income: up 19%.Pretty strong growth observed here. Obviously, growth from cost cuts tends to be a one-time affair, but now that China's Zero COVID policy is officially over, we could see the top-line growth return.ProfitabilityFinally, we have profitability. Alibaba has always been a very profitable company, boasting the following profit metrics for the trailing 12 month period:Gross profit margin: 36%.EBIT margin: 11.2%.FCF margin: 6%.Net margin: 1.6%.Obviously, the net margin is a bit weaker than the other metrics, but remember that Alibaba owns a stock portfolio that has been holding back GAAP net income recently. Swap out GAAP net income for adjusted net income and that figure swells to about 10%.Ryan Cohen's Track RecordHaving demonstrated that Alibaba is a cheap, profitable, and fast growing company, it's now time to look at who has been buying it.Ryan Cohen is the most famous person to invest in Alibaba recently. Best known for his involvement in meme stocks, Cohen's name doesn't necessarily inspire a huge amount of confidence.However, after doing some research, I determined that Ryan Cohen's investing track record is very good. Here's what we know about Cohen's investments:He got his start by founding and growing the company Chewy. He sold it for $3.5 billion.He immediately invested the sales proceeds into Apple (AAPL) at $38.25 and Wells Fargo (WFC) at $46.He achieved a 255% return on Apple and a mildly positive return on WFC if you include dividends.He invested in GameStop (GME) and is sitting on an 890% return.He bought Bed Bath &Beyond (BBBY) and sold at a 56.3% return.Below is a table showing Ryan Cohen's recent investment results. As you can see, he doesn't have a single loser in his portfolio.InvestmentCohen's buy priceCohen's sell priceReturnAAPL$38.25No sale (currently $136)255%WFC$46No known sale (currently $43.5)10.3%GME$2.1$20.79890%BBBY$15.56$24.3356.3%A note on how I calculated Cohen's Wells Fargo return:WFC stock has paid $7.26 in dividends since the first half of 2017. The stock has declined from $46 to $43.5. Therefore, we have a positive $4.26 return ($7.26 in dividends minus $2.5 in capital losses) for a percentage return of 10.3%, assuming no reinvestment.So, basically, Ryan Cohen is up on all of his investments since selling Chewy. His involvement in meme stocks may give off bad optics, but remember that he got into GME extremely early; he was not one of the people calling for the stock to go to $500,000 or anything like that. So, we have evidence of a good capital allocator here. His endorsement of Alibaba is not a negative for current shareholders.The Bottom LineThe bottom line on Ryan Cohen's investment in Alibaba is this:It is no thesis-breaker.In fact, it's arguably a slight positive. If you look past the unflattering nature of some of the names Ryan Cohen has bought, you see a capital allocator with a good track record. Cohen got his start buying Apple and Wells Fargo-two value investor favorites-and he made his money on meme stocks by buying long before those stocks entered their speculative mania phase.In the meantime, we've got Alibaba trading at a cheap valuation, and growing its cash flows at a rapid pace. Who knows whether Cohen's proposed buybacks are really Alibaba's best use of funds, but we can say for sure that they wouldn't hurt.Taking everything into consideration, I'm quite comfortable being in Alibaba stock alongside Ryan Cohen. Maybe Cohen will trigger a flurry of buybacks and retail cloners that take the stock to absurd heights, maybe not. My thesis was never based on that outcome anyway. I'd be quite content to see BABA slowly grind up at 20% CAGR over the next three years, which is what I expect to happen.This article is written by Growth at a Good Price for reference only. Please note the risks.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":241,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9951643968,"gmtCreate":1673480999354,"gmtModify":1676538843112,"author":{"id":"3569303342488537","authorId":"3569303342488537","name":"ColeHii","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":1},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👍","listText":"👍","text":"👍","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":16,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9951643968","repostId":"2302840328","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2302840328","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1673476494,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2302840328?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2023-01-12 06:34","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Wall St Ends Sharply Higher on Optimism Before Key Inflation Report","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2302840328","media":"Reuters","summary":"* CPI report due Thursday before the bell* Bed, Bath & Beyond extends recent gains* Indexes: Dow up ","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>* CPI report due Thursday before the bell</p><p>* Bed, Bath &amp; Beyond extends recent gains</p><p>* Indexes: Dow up 0.8%, S&amp;P 500 up 1.3%, Nasdaq up 1.8%</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f423a7d52d3e3199f0c20726990a22ba\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"1920\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>NEW YORK, Jan 11 (Reuters) - U.S. stocks ended up sharply on Wednesday, with the S&amp;P 500 and Nasdaq gaining more than 1% each as investors were optimistic ahead of an inflation report that could give the Federal Reserve room to dial back on its aggressive interest rate hikes.</p><p>The much-anticipated report due on Thursday is projected by economists polled by Reuters to show U.S. consumer prices grew 6.5% year-on-year in December, moderating from a 7.1% rise in November.</p><p>Among sectors, real estate and consumer discretionary were the day&#39;s strongest performers, while Microsoft, Amazon.com and other mega-cap growth names gave the S&amp;P 500 its biggest boost.</p><p>The benchmark index is up so far for 2023 after falling sharply last year. Hopes that the Fed could soon ease back on its aggressive tightening after raising the federal funds rate seven times in 2022 have boosted the market in recent sessions, even as comments by some Fed officials have supported the view that the central bank needs to remain vigilant about raising rates to fight inflation.</p><p>&#34;Investors are anticipating that we&#39;re closer to a pause than at any other point last year,&#34; said Jake Dollarhide, chief executive officer of Longbow Asset Management in Tulsa, Oklahoma. He said that would be welcomed by the market.</p><p>Also, &#34;any time you have a down year, it&#39;s not surprising many times to have a reversal at the start of the new year,&#34; he said.</p><p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 268.91 points, or 0.8%, to 33,973.01, the S&amp;P 500 gained 50.36 points, or 1.28%, to 3,969.61 and the Nasdaq Composite added 189.04 points, or 1.76%, to 10,931.67.</p><p>Money market participants see a 75% chance the Fed will raise the benchmark rate by 25 basis points in February.</p><p>This week also marks the start of the fourth-quarter earnings season for S&amp;P 500 companies, with overall S&amp;P 500 earnings expected to have declined year-over-year, according to IBES data from Refinitiv.</p><p>The biggest U.S. banks, which kick off the season later this week, are expected to report lower quarterly earnings as risks of a recession rise due to monetary policy tightening.</p><p>Goldman Sachs began laying off staff on Wednesday in a sweeping cost-cutting drive, a source familiar with the matter said. Shares of Goldman Sachs ended up 2%.</p><p>Retailer Bed Bath &amp; Beyond Inc sharply extended recent gains to end up 68.6% despite bleak quarterly results, with some investors speculating it could be a potential acquisition target.</p><p>Volume on U.S. exchanges was 11.42 billion shares, compared with the 11 billion average for the full session over the last 20 trading days.</p><p>Advancing issues outnumbered declining ones on the NYSE by a 3.78-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 2.25-to-1 ratio favored advancers.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 posted 11 new 52-week highs and 1 new low; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 98 new highs and 20 new lows.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Wall St Ends Sharply Higher on Optimism Before Key Inflation Report</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWall St Ends Sharply Higher on Optimism Before Key Inflation Report\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2023-01-12 06:34</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>* CPI report due Thursday before the bell</p><p>* Bed, Bath &amp; Beyond extends recent gains</p><p>* Indexes: Dow up 0.8%, S&amp;P 500 up 1.3%, Nasdaq up 1.8%</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f423a7d52d3e3199f0c20726990a22ba\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"1920\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>NEW YORK, Jan 11 (Reuters) - U.S. stocks ended up sharply on Wednesday, with the S&amp;P 500 and Nasdaq gaining more than 1% each as investors were optimistic ahead of an inflation report that could give the Federal Reserve room to dial back on its aggressive interest rate hikes.</p><p>The much-anticipated report due on Thursday is projected by economists polled by Reuters to show U.S. consumer prices grew 6.5% year-on-year in December, moderating from a 7.1% rise in November.</p><p>Among sectors, real estate and consumer discretionary were the day&#39;s strongest performers, while Microsoft, Amazon.com and other mega-cap growth names gave the S&amp;P 500 its biggest boost.</p><p>The benchmark index is up so far for 2023 after falling sharply last year. Hopes that the Fed could soon ease back on its aggressive tightening after raising the federal funds rate seven times in 2022 have boosted the market in recent sessions, even as comments by some Fed officials have supported the view that the central bank needs to remain vigilant about raising rates to fight inflation.</p><p>&#34;Investors are anticipating that we&#39;re closer to a pause than at any other point last year,&#34; said Jake Dollarhide, chief executive officer of Longbow Asset Management in Tulsa, Oklahoma. He said that would be welcomed by the market.</p><p>Also, &#34;any time you have a down year, it&#39;s not surprising many times to have a reversal at the start of the new year,&#34; he said.</p><p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 268.91 points, or 0.8%, to 33,973.01, the S&amp;P 500 gained 50.36 points, or 1.28%, to 3,969.61 and the Nasdaq Composite added 189.04 points, or 1.76%, to 10,931.67.</p><p>Money market participants see a 75% chance the Fed will raise the benchmark rate by 25 basis points in February.</p><p>This week also marks the start of the fourth-quarter earnings season for S&amp;P 500 companies, with overall S&amp;P 500 earnings expected to have declined year-over-year, according to IBES data from Refinitiv.</p><p>The biggest U.S. banks, which kick off the season later this week, are expected to report lower quarterly earnings as risks of a recession rise due to monetary policy tightening.</p><p>Goldman Sachs began laying off staff on Wednesday in a sweeping cost-cutting drive, a source familiar with the matter said. Shares of Goldman Sachs ended up 2%.</p><p>Retailer Bed Bath &amp; Beyond Inc sharply extended recent gains to end up 68.6% despite bleak quarterly results, with some investors speculating it could be a potential acquisition target.</p><p>Volume on U.S. exchanges was 11.42 billion shares, compared with the 11 billion average for the full session over the last 20 trading days.</p><p>Advancing issues outnumbered declining ones on the NYSE by a 3.78-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 2.25-to-1 ratio favored advancers.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 posted 11 new 52-week highs and 1 new low; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 98 new highs and 20 new lows.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BK4535":"淡马锡持仓","BK4524":"宅经济概念","BK4559":"巴菲特持仓","BK4527":"明星科技股","LU0130102774.USD":"Natixis Harris Associates US Equity RA USD","BK4579":"人工智能","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓","BK4552":"Archegos爆仓风波概念","IE00B1BXHZ80.USD":"Legg Mason ClearBridge - US Appreciation A Acc USD","BK4503":"景林资产持仓","LU0648001328.SGD":"Natixis Harris Associates US Equity RA SGD","BK4122":"互联网与直销零售","LU0276348264.USD":"THREADNEEDLE (LUX) GLOBAL DYNAMIC REAL RETURN\"AUP\" (USD) INC","LU0316494557.USD":"FRANKLIN GLOBAL FUNDAMENTAL STRATEGIES \"A\" ACC","BK4561":"索罗斯持仓","LU0211328371.USD":"TEMPLETON GLOBAL EQUITY INCOME \"A\" (MDIS) (USD)   INC","LU0354030511.USD":"ALLSPRING  U.S. LARGE CAP GROWTH \"I\" (USD) ACC","LU0211327993.USD":"TEMPLETON GLOBAL EQUITY INCOME \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU0708995401.HKD":"FRANKLIN U.S. OPPORTUNITIES \"A\" (HKD) ACC","LU0127658192.USD":"EASTSPRING INVESTMENTS GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY \"A\" (USD) ACC","BK4581":"高盛持仓","LU0354030438.USD":"富国美国大盘成长基金Cl A Acc","IE00BJTD4N35.SGD":"Neuberger Berman US Long Short Equity A1  Acc SGD-H","LU0256863811.USD":"ALLIANZ US EQUITY \"A\" INC","BK4548":"巴美列捷福持仓","LU0528227936.USD":"富达环球人口趋势基金A-ACC","AMZN":"亚马逊","LU0234570918.USD":"高盛全球核心股票组合Acc Close","IE0004445239.USD":"JANUS HENDERSON US FORTY \"A2\" (USD) ACC","IE00B19Z9505.USD":"美盛-美国大盘成长股A Acc","LU0642271901.SGD":"Janus Henderson Horizon Global Technology Leaders A2 SGD-H","BK4554":"元宇宙及AR概念","BK4178":"家庭装饰零售","LU0640476718.USD":"THREADNEEDLE (LUX) US CONTRARIAN CORE EQ \"AU\" (USD) ACC","IE00B1XK9C88.USD":"PINEBRIDGE US LARGE CAP RESEARCH ENHANCED \"A\" (USD) ACC","MSFT":"微软","BK4507":"流媒体概念","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓",".DJI":"道琼斯","GS":"高盛","BK4533":"AQR资本管理(全球第二大对冲基金)","IE00BSNM7G36.USD":"NEUBERGER BERMAN SYSTEMATIC GLOBAL SUSTAINABLE VALUE \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU0310799852.SGD":"FTIF - Templeton Global Equity Income A MDIS SGD",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite","BBBY":"3B家居",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2302840328","content_text":"* CPI report due Thursday before the bell* Bed, Bath & Beyond extends recent gains* Indexes: Dow up 0.8%, S&P 500 up 1.3%, Nasdaq up 1.8%NEW YORK, Jan 11 (Reuters) - U.S. stocks ended up sharply on Wednesday, with the S&P 500 and Nasdaq gaining more than 1% each as investors were optimistic ahead of an inflation report that could give the Federal Reserve room to dial back on its aggressive interest rate hikes.The much-anticipated report due on Thursday is projected by economists polled by Reuters to show U.S. consumer prices grew 6.5% year-on-year in December, moderating from a 7.1% rise in November.Among sectors, real estate and consumer discretionary were the day's strongest performers, while Microsoft, Amazon.com and other mega-cap growth names gave the S&P 500 its biggest boost.The benchmark index is up so far for 2023 after falling sharply last year. Hopes that the Fed could soon ease back on its aggressive tightening after raising the federal funds rate seven times in 2022 have boosted the market in recent sessions, even as comments by some Fed officials have supported the view that the central bank needs to remain vigilant about raising rates to fight inflation.\"Investors are anticipating that we're closer to a pause than at any other point last year,\" said Jake Dollarhide, chief executive officer of Longbow Asset Management in Tulsa, Oklahoma. He said that would be welcomed by the market.Also, \"any time you have a down year, it's not surprising many times to have a reversal at the start of the new year,\" he said.The Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 268.91 points, or 0.8%, to 33,973.01, the S&P 500 gained 50.36 points, or 1.28%, to 3,969.61 and the Nasdaq Composite added 189.04 points, or 1.76%, to 10,931.67.Money market participants see a 75% chance the Fed will raise the benchmark rate by 25 basis points in February.This week also marks the start of the fourth-quarter earnings season for S&P 500 companies, with overall S&P 500 earnings expected to have declined year-over-year, according to IBES data from Refinitiv.The biggest U.S. banks, which kick off the season later this week, are expected to report lower quarterly earnings as risks of a recession rise due to monetary policy tightening.Goldman Sachs began laying off staff on Wednesday in a sweeping cost-cutting drive, a source familiar with the matter said. Shares of Goldman Sachs ended up 2%.Retailer Bed Bath & Beyond Inc sharply extended recent gains to end up 68.6% despite bleak quarterly results, with some investors speculating it could be a potential acquisition target.Volume on U.S. exchanges was 11.42 billion shares, compared with the 11 billion average for the full session over the last 20 trading days.Advancing issues outnumbered declining ones on the NYSE by a 3.78-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 2.25-to-1 ratio favored advancers.The S&P 500 posted 11 new 52-week highs and 1 new low; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 98 new highs and 20 new lows.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":332,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9953380890,"gmtCreate":1673156581110,"gmtModify":1676538793448,"author":{"id":"3569303342488537","authorId":"3569303342488537","name":"ColeHii","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":1},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👍","listText":"👍","text":"👍","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":14,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9953380890","repostId":"2301475181","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2301475181","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1673140820,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2301475181?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2023-01-08 09:20","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Earnings Season Will Test the Market’s Great Start","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2301475181","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"Investors got their Goldilocks jobs report on Friday morning, with a growing-but-slowing labor marke","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Investors got their Goldilocks jobs report on Friday morning, with a growing-but-slowing labor market, a tick-up in participation, and a deceleration in the pace of wage gains.</p><p>It was the kind of release that makes an oft-wished-for soft landing seem almost possible.</p><p>If job growth can continue without fueling a wage-price spiral, then perhaps it won&#39;t take a recession to break the back of inflation, especially as increases in commodities and goods prices continue to reverse. The Federal Reserve could declare victory in its inflation fight and ease off its monetary policy tightening sooner rather than later in 2023, setting off rallies across asset classes.</p><p>So goes the bullish thinking.</p><p>That narrative was on display this past Friday when stock indexes surged to end a choppy holiday-shortened week higher. The S&amp;P 500 finished the week up 1.45%, the Dow Jones Industrial Average added 1.46%, and the Nasdaq Composite ticked up 0.98%.</p><p>If all that sounds familiar, it should. The Fed has stated that it plans to increase interest rates in early 2023, then hold there for some time. Federal-funds futures pricing, however, implies a peak in rates by the spring, then cuts in the back half of 2023. It&#39;s another sign that investors expect the Fed to change its tune. They hope Friday&#39;s jobs report sent the Fed a message -- its job is almost done.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d8d660bff719b54ee732ddb0da0da2f9\" tg-width=\"955\" tg-height=\"636\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>One data point, however, won&#39;t be enough to change the Fed&#39;s mind. The market will be looking to December&#39;s consumer price index this coming Thursday as its next macro bogey -- one that will provide additional fodder for the Fed&#39;s next policy meeting in February. The rate of inflation is expected to fall to 6.5% year over year from 7.1% in November.</p><p>But it&#39;s not just about the economic data. This coming Friday brings the start of fourth-quarter earnings season, with some major companies -- JPMorgan Chase (ticker: JPM), Bank of America (BAC), UnitedHealth Group (UNH), and Delta Air Lines (DAL) among them -- kicking off the festivities. The vast majority of the S&amp;P 500 will report over the following month and a half.</p><p>Few are expecting a good fourth quarter. In aggregate, S&amp;P 500 companies are expected to report their first losing quarter since 2020. Earnings per share are forecast to decline by 2.2% year over year, to $53.87, after roughly 4.4% growth in the third quarter and 8.4% in the second quarter, per IBES data from Refinitiv. The consensus fourth-quarter outlook became much gloomier as 2022 proceeded -- at the start of last year, analysts had penciled in 14.1% year-over-year earnings growth for the period.</p><p>Analysts&#39; current estimate would bring 2022 S&amp;P 500 EPS to $219.80, which would be up 5.6% for the year. It&#39;s likely to end up a bit better than that, as most companies tend to beat consensus estimates. Revenue, though, is forecast to rise 4.1% year over year in the fourth quarter, to $3.7 trillion, and 11.2% for all of 2022, to $13.8 trillion. The fact that sales are rising but earnings are falling is a sign that corporate profit margins appear to have peaked for this cycle.</p><p>The earnings slump won&#39;t hit all companies equally. The energy and industrial sectors are expected to be outliers, delivering EPS growth of 65% and 43%, respectively, from a year earlier. Those are among the cyclically sensitive companies that suffered the most during the Covid-19 recession and are still enjoying the rebound.</p><p>On the opposite end of the spectrum are materials, where earnings are forecast to drop by 22% as prices of many industrial inputs have returned to earth; communication services, down 21% due to an expected drop in advertising spending and continued streaming losses at many media companies; and consumer discretionary, down 15% on potentially weaker spending in 2023. Tech, which makes up close to a quarter of the S&amp;P 500&#39;s EPS, is expected to show a 9% decline in earnings in the fourth quarter as wage costs balloon at many software companies, enterprise demand slows, and semiconductors remain in a downturn. Expectations are so low that the fourth-quarter results could be strong relative to forecasts.</p><p>But those beats might not matter if companies can&#39;t provide at least a decent outlook for 2023.</p><p>The bottom-up consensus -- gleaned by summing the average earnings estimates from all individual stock and sector analysts for each of the companies in the S&amp;P 500 -- is for EPS to grow by 4.4% to $229.52 in 2023, according to Refinitiv, up from about $220 in 2022. Conversely, the top-down view of Wall Street strategists surveyed by Barron&#39;s in December calls for a 2.7% decline in S&amp;P 500 profits in 2023 to an average of $214 per share.</p><p>The difference is in the profit margins. Strategists see them getting squeezed by rising wages and higher interest costs, even as the prices they charge customers moderate. That&#39;s largely in line with the Fed&#39;s view that some elements of inflation are sticky and will take time -- and economic pain -- to bring down. If that scenario plays out, the shift lower in earnings expectations would make the market appear pricier even as the Fed continues to increase interest rates.</p><p>Needless to say, that&#39;s not a winning combination for stocks -- no matter what the jobs report said.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Earnings Season Will Test the Market’s Great Start</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nEarnings Season Will Test the Market’s Great Start\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2023-01-08 09:20</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>Investors got their Goldilocks jobs report on Friday morning, with a growing-but-slowing labor market, a tick-up in participation, and a deceleration in the pace of wage gains.</p><p>It was the kind of release that makes an oft-wished-for soft landing seem almost possible.</p><p>If job growth can continue without fueling a wage-price spiral, then perhaps it won&#39;t take a recession to break the back of inflation, especially as increases in commodities and goods prices continue to reverse. The Federal Reserve could declare victory in its inflation fight and ease off its monetary policy tightening sooner rather than later in 2023, setting off rallies across asset classes.</p><p>So goes the bullish thinking.</p><p>That narrative was on display this past Friday when stock indexes surged to end a choppy holiday-shortened week higher. The S&amp;P 500 finished the week up 1.45%, the Dow Jones Industrial Average added 1.46%, and the Nasdaq Composite ticked up 0.98%.</p><p>If all that sounds familiar, it should. The Fed has stated that it plans to increase interest rates in early 2023, then hold there for some time. Federal-funds futures pricing, however, implies a peak in rates by the spring, then cuts in the back half of 2023. It&#39;s another sign that investors expect the Fed to change its tune. They hope Friday&#39;s jobs report sent the Fed a message -- its job is almost done.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d8d660bff719b54ee732ddb0da0da2f9\" tg-width=\"955\" tg-height=\"636\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>One data point, however, won&#39;t be enough to change the Fed&#39;s mind. The market will be looking to December&#39;s consumer price index this coming Thursday as its next macro bogey -- one that will provide additional fodder for the Fed&#39;s next policy meeting in February. The rate of inflation is expected to fall to 6.5% year over year from 7.1% in November.</p><p>But it&#39;s not just about the economic data. This coming Friday brings the start of fourth-quarter earnings season, with some major companies -- JPMorgan Chase (ticker: JPM), Bank of America (BAC), UnitedHealth Group (UNH), and Delta Air Lines (DAL) among them -- kicking off the festivities. The vast majority of the S&amp;P 500 will report over the following month and a half.</p><p>Few are expecting a good fourth quarter. In aggregate, S&amp;P 500 companies are expected to report their first losing quarter since 2020. Earnings per share are forecast to decline by 2.2% year over year, to $53.87, after roughly 4.4% growth in the third quarter and 8.4% in the second quarter, per IBES data from Refinitiv. The consensus fourth-quarter outlook became much gloomier as 2022 proceeded -- at the start of last year, analysts had penciled in 14.1% year-over-year earnings growth for the period.</p><p>Analysts&#39; current estimate would bring 2022 S&amp;P 500 EPS to $219.80, which would be up 5.6% for the year. It&#39;s likely to end up a bit better than that, as most companies tend to beat consensus estimates. Revenue, though, is forecast to rise 4.1% year over year in the fourth quarter, to $3.7 trillion, and 11.2% for all of 2022, to $13.8 trillion. The fact that sales are rising but earnings are falling is a sign that corporate profit margins appear to have peaked for this cycle.</p><p>The earnings slump won&#39;t hit all companies equally. The energy and industrial sectors are expected to be outliers, delivering EPS growth of 65% and 43%, respectively, from a year earlier. Those are among the cyclically sensitive companies that suffered the most during the Covid-19 recession and are still enjoying the rebound.</p><p>On the opposite end of the spectrum are materials, where earnings are forecast to drop by 22% as prices of many industrial inputs have returned to earth; communication services, down 21% due to an expected drop in advertising spending and continued streaming losses at many media companies; and consumer discretionary, down 15% on potentially weaker spending in 2023. Tech, which makes up close to a quarter of the S&amp;P 500&#39;s EPS, is expected to show a 9% decline in earnings in the fourth quarter as wage costs balloon at many software companies, enterprise demand slows, and semiconductors remain in a downturn. Expectations are so low that the fourth-quarter results could be strong relative to forecasts.</p><p>But those beats might not matter if companies can&#39;t provide at least a decent outlook for 2023.</p><p>The bottom-up consensus -- gleaned by summing the average earnings estimates from all individual stock and sector analysts for each of the companies in the S&amp;P 500 -- is for EPS to grow by 4.4% to $229.52 in 2023, according to Refinitiv, up from about $220 in 2022. Conversely, the top-down view of Wall Street strategists surveyed by Barron&#39;s in December calls for a 2.7% decline in S&amp;P 500 profits in 2023 to an average of $214 per share.</p><p>The difference is in the profit margins. Strategists see them getting squeezed by rising wages and higher interest costs, even as the prices they charge customers moderate. That&#39;s largely in line with the Fed&#39;s view that some elements of inflation are sticky and will take time -- and economic pain -- to bring down. If that scenario plays out, the shift lower in earnings expectations would make the market appear pricier even as the Fed continues to increase interest rates.</p><p>Needless to say, that&#39;s not a winning combination for stocks -- no matter what the jobs report said.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"JPM":"摩根大通","DAL":"达美航空",".DJI":"道琼斯","BAC":"美国银行",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite","UNH":"联合健康",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2301475181","content_text":"Investors got their Goldilocks jobs report on Friday morning, with a growing-but-slowing labor market, a tick-up in participation, and a deceleration in the pace of wage gains.It was the kind of release that makes an oft-wished-for soft landing seem almost possible.If job growth can continue without fueling a wage-price spiral, then perhaps it won't take a recession to break the back of inflation, especially as increases in commodities and goods prices continue to reverse. The Federal Reserve could declare victory in its inflation fight and ease off its monetary policy tightening sooner rather than later in 2023, setting off rallies across asset classes.So goes the bullish thinking.That narrative was on display this past Friday when stock indexes surged to end a choppy holiday-shortened week higher. The S&P 500 finished the week up 1.45%, the Dow Jones Industrial Average added 1.46%, and the Nasdaq Composite ticked up 0.98%.If all that sounds familiar, it should. The Fed has stated that it plans to increase interest rates in early 2023, then hold there for some time. Federal-funds futures pricing, however, implies a peak in rates by the spring, then cuts in the back half of 2023. It's another sign that investors expect the Fed to change its tune. They hope Friday's jobs report sent the Fed a message -- its job is almost done.One data point, however, won't be enough to change the Fed's mind. The market will be looking to December's consumer price index this coming Thursday as its next macro bogey -- one that will provide additional fodder for the Fed's next policy meeting in February. The rate of inflation is expected to fall to 6.5% year over year from 7.1% in November.But it's not just about the economic data. This coming Friday brings the start of fourth-quarter earnings season, with some major companies -- JPMorgan Chase (ticker: JPM), Bank of America (BAC), UnitedHealth Group (UNH), and Delta Air Lines (DAL) among them -- kicking off the festivities. The vast majority of the S&P 500 will report over the following month and a half.Few are expecting a good fourth quarter. In aggregate, S&P 500 companies are expected to report their first losing quarter since 2020. Earnings per share are forecast to decline by 2.2% year over year, to $53.87, after roughly 4.4% growth in the third quarter and 8.4% in the second quarter, per IBES data from Refinitiv. The consensus fourth-quarter outlook became much gloomier as 2022 proceeded -- at the start of last year, analysts had penciled in 14.1% year-over-year earnings growth for the period.Analysts' current estimate would bring 2022 S&P 500 EPS to $219.80, which would be up 5.6% for the year. It's likely to end up a bit better than that, as most companies tend to beat consensus estimates. Revenue, though, is forecast to rise 4.1% year over year in the fourth quarter, to $3.7 trillion, and 11.2% for all of 2022, to $13.8 trillion. The fact that sales are rising but earnings are falling is a sign that corporate profit margins appear to have peaked for this cycle.The earnings slump won't hit all companies equally. The energy and industrial sectors are expected to be outliers, delivering EPS growth of 65% and 43%, respectively, from a year earlier. Those are among the cyclically sensitive companies that suffered the most during the Covid-19 recession and are still enjoying the rebound.On the opposite end of the spectrum are materials, where earnings are forecast to drop by 22% as prices of many industrial inputs have returned to earth; communication services, down 21% due to an expected drop in advertising spending and continued streaming losses at many media companies; and consumer discretionary, down 15% on potentially weaker spending in 2023. Tech, which makes up close to a quarter of the S&P 500's EPS, is expected to show a 9% decline in earnings in the fourth quarter as wage costs balloon at many software companies, enterprise demand slows, and semiconductors remain in a downturn. Expectations are so low that the fourth-quarter results could be strong relative to forecasts.But those beats might not matter if companies can't provide at least a decent outlook for 2023.The bottom-up consensus -- gleaned by summing the average earnings estimates from all individual stock and sector analysts for each of the companies in the S&P 500 -- is for EPS to grow by 4.4% to $229.52 in 2023, according to Refinitiv, up from about $220 in 2022. Conversely, the top-down view of Wall Street strategists surveyed by Barron's in December calls for a 2.7% decline in S&P 500 profits in 2023 to an average of $214 per share.The difference is in the profit margins. Strategists see them getting squeezed by rising wages and higher interest costs, even as the prices they charge customers moderate. That's largely in line with the Fed's view that some elements of inflation are sticky and will take time -- and economic pain -- to bring down. If that scenario plays out, the shift lower in earnings expectations would make the market appear pricier even as the Fed continues to increase interest rates.Needless to say, that's not a winning combination for stocks -- no matter what the jobs report said.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":257,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9959640812,"gmtCreate":1672978399737,"gmtModify":1676538765772,"author":{"id":"3569303342488537","authorId":"3569303342488537","name":"ColeHii","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":1},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👍","listText":"👍","text":"👍","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":9,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9959640812","repostId":"1128856051","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1128856051","pubTimestamp":1672974368,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1128856051?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2023-01-06 11:06","market":"us","language":"en","title":"The Many Forces Fueling Tesla’s $860 Billion Tumble","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1128856051","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"Investors in Elon Musk’s day job are feeling a lot less excited about the future.Until fairly recent","content":"<html><head></head><body><ul><li>Investors in Elon Musk’s day job are feeling a lot less excited about the future.</li></ul><p>Until fairly recently, higher-end Tesla cars had a setting called “ludicrous mode,” which used their high-torque electric engines to achieve superfast acceleration. In the past year, ludicrous mode has also been an apt description of Tesla Inc.’s share price—except it’s been running in reverse.</p><p>From about $1.2 trillion at the start of 2022, the company’s market value has fallen more than 70%, to $340 billion. That still makes it by far the most valuable automaker in the world. Ford Motor, General Motors, Stellantis and Toyota Motor are worth about the same amount combined. But another way to put it is that Tesla’s fall has wiped out the equivalent of the value of four major car companies, more than twice over. And Chief Executive Officer Elon Musk has made history by losing more money in his personal fortune than anyone ever.</p><p>The most obvious explanation is that Tesla is an especially high-growth, high-speculation stock in a market that pumped up such companies in 2020 and 2021 before abruptly turning on them in 2022 as interest rates rose and the stock market fell overall. Musk pointed to this dynamic in a mid-December Twitter post. (More on the tweets in a moment.) He said that when people can earn higher rates without risk, they tend to move money “out of stocks into cash.”</p><p>Yet, Tesla’s decline is conspicuous even among once-frothy tech stocks. In 2022 the stock was the worst performer in the NYSE FANG+ Index—a gauge of 10 large technology companies that includes Amazon.com, Apple and Meta Platforms. That index is down about 40% over the past year, which is still much less than Tesla’s drop. The carmaker’s shares had largely traded in line with other major technology stocks last year until around September, then they diverged sharply. In the past three months, Tesla fell 59%, compared with a 6.7% loss for the FANG+ and a 6.7% rise for the S&amp;P 500.</p><p>The rest of the explanation is what Mark Stoeckle, CEO of Adams Funds, which holds Tesla shares, calls “a cocktail of misery.” As a leader, Musk has given any investor nervous about Tesla’s lofty valuation plenty of headlines to justify selling, while the company itself deals with new challenges.</p><p>Start with Musk’s Twitter adventures—both as a heavy user of the social media platform and now as the owner. The first blow came in November 2021, when he conducted a Twitter poll asking whether he should sell 10% of his stake in Tesla. Respondents said yes. Within two months, Musk had sold $16 billion of Tesla shares. Things escalated quickly in 2022 after he announced his intention to acquire Twitter Inc.</p><p>After trying to wriggle out of the deal, Musk finally had to go through with it. All along, Tesla investors worried about his needing to sell even more of his stake in the car company to pay for Twitter. Another concern was that his obvious preoccupation with the platform was distracting him from Tesla.</p><p>Musk has now sold almost $40 billion of Tesla shares since late 2021. And though he recently said he has no plans to sell more stock anytime soon, the market almost always dislikes the idea of a company insider selling, taking it as a sign of low confidence.</p><p>At the same time, Musk has stirred the pot of countless social and political controversies since taking over Twitter, with his own trolling tweets and sudden changes to moderation policies. The chaotic Twitter sideshow matters because Musk’s persona is so closely associated with Tesla. “A lot of damage has been done to the brand and the story, and the news flow may stay negative on Elon Musk for a while,” says Catherine Faddis, senior portfolio manager at Fernwood Investment Management LLC.</p><p>Still, most Tesla investors are probably more focused on the electric vehicle business—and the company has simply faced a high bar of expectations. After all, this is a stock that rose more than 1,100% over 2020 and 2021. Whereas analysts on average expect GM’s or Ford’s revenue to expand at a pace of low- to mid-single-digit percentages over the next five years, for Tesla they model an average 25% jump every year.</p><p>That thesis has started to show some cracks, after the company’s vehicle deliveries failed to meet analysts’ expectations for three straight quarters. The latest miss was reported on Jan. 2, sending the stock to its lowest since August 2020. Tesla still delivered a 40% annual increase while setting a quarterly record, but to many it was a relative disappointment that augurs a new reality for the EV industry as well as for Tesla.</p><p>Economists are warning of a possible global recession in 2023. Meanwhile, high inflation over the past year and the increased cost of financing for a car are pushing consumers to delay plans for purchasing expensive vehicles, and electric cars are typically pricier than gas-fueled ones.</p><p>Tesla rarely discounts, but it recently offered customers in the US a $7,500 yearend deal to boost deliveries. It’s also cut prices and production in China. “Our base case assumption is that year-over-year growth (while remaining impressive overall) is likely to decline each year from here on out,” JPMorgan Chase &amp; Co. analyst Ryan Brinkman wrote in a note to clients after the release of Tesla’s latest quarterly delivery numbers.</p><p>An economic slowdown will be responsible for some of that, but Brinkman also points to the rising threat from competition. Older carmakers may have been late to the electric game, but they’re planning to flood the market with a slew of EVs over the next few years. A report from S&amp;P Global Mobility in November found that Tesla’s share in EV sales was set to drop to below 20% by 2025, from a dominant 79% in 2020.</p><p>Bulls can point to how the EV market is still growing fast enough for Tesla to sell more cars even if its share drops. For now the company is still synonymous with EVs for vast groups of potential electric car buyers who haven’t made the switch. And the colossal Japanese auto industry has been slow to move on EVs.</p><p>“The current growth story for Tesla is positive, and while we’ve seen a large drop in the price of Tesla’s stock, we haven’t seen any material decline in the operations of the company,” says Brian Mulberry, client portfolio manager at Zacks Investment Management. “Sales estimates are still stable, margins are improving, and earnings are growing.”</p><p>As Tesla’s history in the bull market shows, the stock is sensitive to market psychology. Among big tech-related stocks, it’s most similar to Meta, which fell 64% last year. Both companies face specific issues—with Meta they include slipping social media revenue and CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s focus on the metaverse—but also a fierce, general mood of skepticism among investors. They’re less willing to cut managers slack today based on hopes for growth in the farther-off future. That might shift quickly again should economic data and Tesla’s results improve.</p><p>Adams Funds’ Stoeckle says Tesla stock still isn’t cheap, even at these prices. It remains an optimist’s bet. “It’s important not to simply expect that a significant drop in the price of a stock means it’s therefore attractive—so many stocks in 2022 were rerated and deserved to be,” he says. “There are enough questions about the operations of Tesla—China demand, price cuts, good competition—that makes it hard to declare the current valuation is correct.”</p></body></html>","source":"lsy1584095487587","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>The Many Forces Fueling Tesla’s $860 Billion Tumble</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nThe Many Forces Fueling Tesla’s $860 Billion Tumble\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2023-01-06 11:06 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-01-05/tesla-tsla-stock-price-reflects-multiple-headwinds><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Investors in Elon Musk’s day job are feeling a lot less excited about the future.Until fairly recently, higher-end Tesla cars had a setting called “ludicrous mode,” which used their high-torque ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-01-05/tesla-tsla-stock-price-reflects-multiple-headwinds\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-01-05/tesla-tsla-stock-price-reflects-multiple-headwinds","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1128856051","content_text":"Investors in Elon Musk’s day job are feeling a lot less excited about the future.Until fairly recently, higher-end Tesla cars had a setting called “ludicrous mode,” which used their high-torque electric engines to achieve superfast acceleration. In the past year, ludicrous mode has also been an apt description of Tesla Inc.’s share price—except it’s been running in reverse.From about $1.2 trillion at the start of 2022, the company’s market value has fallen more than 70%, to $340 billion. That still makes it by far the most valuable automaker in the world. Ford Motor, General Motors, Stellantis and Toyota Motor are worth about the same amount combined. But another way to put it is that Tesla’s fall has wiped out the equivalent of the value of four major car companies, more than twice over. And Chief Executive Officer Elon Musk has made history by losing more money in his personal fortune than anyone ever.The most obvious explanation is that Tesla is an especially high-growth, high-speculation stock in a market that pumped up such companies in 2020 and 2021 before abruptly turning on them in 2022 as interest rates rose and the stock market fell overall. Musk pointed to this dynamic in a mid-December Twitter post. (More on the tweets in a moment.) He said that when people can earn higher rates without risk, they tend to move money “out of stocks into cash.”Yet, Tesla’s decline is conspicuous even among once-frothy tech stocks. In 2022 the stock was the worst performer in the NYSE FANG+ Index—a gauge of 10 large technology companies that includes Amazon.com, Apple and Meta Platforms. That index is down about 40% over the past year, which is still much less than Tesla’s drop. The carmaker’s shares had largely traded in line with other major technology stocks last year until around September, then they diverged sharply. In the past three months, Tesla fell 59%, compared with a 6.7% loss for the FANG+ and a 6.7% rise for the S&P 500.The rest of the explanation is what Mark Stoeckle, CEO of Adams Funds, which holds Tesla shares, calls “a cocktail of misery.” As a leader, Musk has given any investor nervous about Tesla’s lofty valuation plenty of headlines to justify selling, while the company itself deals with new challenges.Start with Musk’s Twitter adventures—both as a heavy user of the social media platform and now as the owner. The first blow came in November 2021, when he conducted a Twitter poll asking whether he should sell 10% of his stake in Tesla. Respondents said yes. Within two months, Musk had sold $16 billion of Tesla shares. Things escalated quickly in 2022 after he announced his intention to acquire Twitter Inc.After trying to wriggle out of the deal, Musk finally had to go through with it. All along, Tesla investors worried about his needing to sell even more of his stake in the car company to pay for Twitter. Another concern was that his obvious preoccupation with the platform was distracting him from Tesla.Musk has now sold almost $40 billion of Tesla shares since late 2021. And though he recently said he has no plans to sell more stock anytime soon, the market almost always dislikes the idea of a company insider selling, taking it as a sign of low confidence.At the same time, Musk has stirred the pot of countless social and political controversies since taking over Twitter, with his own trolling tweets and sudden changes to moderation policies. The chaotic Twitter sideshow matters because Musk’s persona is so closely associated with Tesla. “A lot of damage has been done to the brand and the story, and the news flow may stay negative on Elon Musk for a while,” says Catherine Faddis, senior portfolio manager at Fernwood Investment Management LLC.Still, most Tesla investors are probably more focused on the electric vehicle business—and the company has simply faced a high bar of expectations. After all, this is a stock that rose more than 1,100% over 2020 and 2021. Whereas analysts on average expect GM’s or Ford’s revenue to expand at a pace of low- to mid-single-digit percentages over the next five years, for Tesla they model an average 25% jump every year.That thesis has started to show some cracks, after the company’s vehicle deliveries failed to meet analysts’ expectations for three straight quarters. The latest miss was reported on Jan. 2, sending the stock to its lowest since August 2020. Tesla still delivered a 40% annual increase while setting a quarterly record, but to many it was a relative disappointment that augurs a new reality for the EV industry as well as for Tesla.Economists are warning of a possible global recession in 2023. Meanwhile, high inflation over the past year and the increased cost of financing for a car are pushing consumers to delay plans for purchasing expensive vehicles, and electric cars are typically pricier than gas-fueled ones.Tesla rarely discounts, but it recently offered customers in the US a $7,500 yearend deal to boost deliveries. It’s also cut prices and production in China. “Our base case assumption is that year-over-year growth (while remaining impressive overall) is likely to decline each year from here on out,” JPMorgan Chase & Co. analyst Ryan Brinkman wrote in a note to clients after the release of Tesla’s latest quarterly delivery numbers.An economic slowdown will be responsible for some of that, but Brinkman also points to the rising threat from competition. Older carmakers may have been late to the electric game, but they’re planning to flood the market with a slew of EVs over the next few years. A report from S&P Global Mobility in November found that Tesla’s share in EV sales was set to drop to below 20% by 2025, from a dominant 79% in 2020.Bulls can point to how the EV market is still growing fast enough for Tesla to sell more cars even if its share drops. For now the company is still synonymous with EVs for vast groups of potential electric car buyers who haven’t made the switch. And the colossal Japanese auto industry has been slow to move on EVs.“The current growth story for Tesla is positive, and while we’ve seen a large drop in the price of Tesla’s stock, we haven’t seen any material decline in the operations of the company,” says Brian Mulberry, client portfolio manager at Zacks Investment Management. “Sales estimates are still stable, margins are improving, and earnings are growing.”As Tesla’s history in the bull market shows, the stock is sensitive to market psychology. Among big tech-related stocks, it’s most similar to Meta, which fell 64% last year. Both companies face specific issues—with Meta they include slipping social media revenue and CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s focus on the metaverse—but also a fierce, general mood of skepticism among investors. They’re less willing to cut managers slack today based on hopes for growth in the farther-off future. That might shift quickly again should economic data and Tesla’s results improve.Adams Funds’ Stoeckle says Tesla stock still isn’t cheap, even at these prices. It remains an optimist’s bet. “It’s important not to simply expect that a significant drop in the price of a stock means it’s therefore attractive—so many stocks in 2022 were rerated and deserved to be,” he says. “There are enough questions about the operations of Tesla—China demand, price cuts, good competition—that makes it hard to declare the current valuation is correct.”","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":207,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9959343206,"gmtCreate":1672914309509,"gmtModify":1676538757483,"author":{"id":"3569303342488537","authorId":"3569303342488537","name":"ColeHii","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":1},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👍","listText":"👍","text":"👍","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":10,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9959343206","repostId":"2300447122","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2300447122","pubTimestamp":1672932607,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2300447122?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2023-01-05 23:30","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Down Over 20% In 2022, These 3 Warren Buffett Stocks Are Smart Buys in 2023","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2300447122","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"The price levels for these three Berkshire stocks might be too good for long-term investors to pass up.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>When investors are looking for guidance on stock picks, it can help to follow the lead of successful investors. Warren Buffett has a long history of market success and his investing strategies can point most investors in the right direction. Through his holding company, <b>Berkshire Hathaway</b>, Buffett has achieved success that has made him one of the best-known investors of all time.</p><p>But just because he&#39;s been successful doesn&#39;t mean Buffett&#39;s investments are foolproof or exempt from market downturns. Like many other investors in 2022, Buffett saw some of his (and Berkshire&#39;s) holdings lose value over the past 12 months. Let&#39;s take a closer look at three of those picks that lost value in 2022 and whether they are worth buying in 2023.</p><h2>1. Amazon</h2><p>Warren Buffett is known for value investing, a strategy involving finding stocks that are trading below their intrinsic (real) value. For example, if a company&#39;s stock price is $200 and an investor believes its intrinsic value is $250, they would invest, hoping to profit from the 25% increase when the market finally prices the stock correctly.</p><p>Although <b>Amazon</b> didn&#39;t fit the mold of a value stock for much of its existence, it&#39;s getting closer to matching that description these days. And while Buffett initially avoided the stock because it was so focused on growth, he has grown to love it. Berkshire Hathaway began buying Amazon stocks in 2019 at the direction of one of Buffett&#39;s trusted lieutenants, and the Oracle of Omaha admitted he was &#34;an idiot&#34; for not buying sooner.</p><p>Most everyone is familiar with Amazon as an online retailer, but it is becoming more known these days for its somewhat underrated (but lucrative) part of its business -- its cloud computing segment Amazon Web Services (AWS). As of September 2022, AWS controlled around 34% of the cloud market and lead the category by a wide margin. Cloud services are becoming increasingly indispensable for many businesses, and the global cloud market is currently around $480 billion. But it&#39;s expected to surpass $1.7 trillion annually by 2029, a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of nearly 20%.</p><p>E-commerce is Amazon&#39;s bread and butter, but AWS is where the profits will be found, especially when you look at its margins. In 2021, AWS accounted for around 13% of Amazon&#39;s revenue, but it was responsible for almost three-quarters of its operating profit. Advertising is another segment seeing outsized growth for Amazon, pulling in nearly $10 billion just in its most recent quarter and climbing 25% year over year.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8f552c74d2e16b339b3eef1fa9208576\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"433\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>Data by YCharts.</p><p>Amazon&#39;s price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio is down over 72% in the past five years, meaning the stock is as cheap as it&#39;s been in a while. The stock price was down about 49% in 2022, but very few analysts expect it not to recover those losses. This opportunity could be too good to pass up for long-term investors.</p><h2>2. Bank of America</h2><p>Although Berkshire Hathaway stock doesn&#39;t pay dividends, dividend stocks make up a good portion of its portfolio, bringing in more than $6 billion in yearly dividend income to the company. One of those dividend cash cows is <b>Bank of America</b>, which Berkshire Hathaway owns over 1.03 billion shares of (it accounts for 11% of Berkshire&#39;s portfolio). With a $0.88 yearly dividend per share, Bank of America provides Berkshire Hathaway with over $1 billion in dividend income annually.</p><p>As with many other companies, it was a rough 2022 for Bank of America, down about 25.6%. While rising interest rates negatively affected the bottom line of many businesses, it was a plus for bank stocks like Bank of America as it increased interest income on the money it lent. In the third quarter of 2022, BofA brought in $13.8 billion in interest income, up 24% year over year and more than half of its $24.5 billion in total revenue. Until inflation is brought under control, those elevated interest rates are likely to remain.</p><p>As the country&#39;s second-largest bank, Bank of America is well-capitalized to handle any adverse economic conditions that could come in 2023. The repercussions of a less-than-ideal economy are likely already priced into the stock, which could mean it&#39;ll see brighter days before the overall economy -- especially when investors begin to anticipate better conditions instead of prepping for the worst.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f98653259f0fd2e507d7138444e55567\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"500\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>Data by YCharts.</p><p>There&#39;s a reason Bank of America is considered a blue chip stock: It&#39;s battle-tested and proven. And at current price levels and forward P/E ratios below other competitors, it&#39;s a great long-term play for investors with time on their side.</p><h2>3. Apple</h2><p>With a market cap hovering around the $2 trillion mark, <b>Apple</b> is the world&#39;s most valuable company and the largest Berkshire Hathaway holding by market value. It&#39;s also a certified cash cow, bringing in over $394.3 billion in revenue in its 2022 fiscal year, up 7.8%, and $100 billion in net income, up 5.4%. It&#39;s these kind of metrics that Buffett loves in companies: stable earnings, strong balance sheets, and plenty of profits.</p><p>Two things make Apple a solid buy right now: an emphasis on making services a bigger part of its revenue and its free cash flow (FCF).</p><p>The brand loyalty of Apple consumers can&#39;t be understated. Once someone is in the company&#39;s ecosystem, it&#39;s hard to abandon it completely. But part of creating such an effective ecosystem is having the services to complement its hardware products. In its 2022 fiscal year, Apple&#39;s services revenue grew by over 14%, compared to just over 6% for its hardware. Services provide roughly one-fifth of the company&#39;s revenue, but the steady growth is a positive sign for the future.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/57ef62ba71203f7aa358bcb15ec4c52c\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"500\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>Data by YCharts.</p><p>Apple&#39;s $111.4 billion in FCF gives it the financial resources to weather any economic storm, and with its stock down nearly 27% in the past 12 months, now could be the time for investing in it or increase a current stake. The company&#39;s commitment to innovation will be a growth driver for many years to come.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Down Over 20% In 2022, These 3 Warren Buffett Stocks Are Smart Buys in 2023</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nDown Over 20% In 2022, These 3 Warren Buffett Stocks Are Smart Buys in 2023\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2023-01-05 23:30 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2023/01/04/down-this-year-warren-buffett-stock-smart-buy/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>When investors are looking for guidance on stock picks, it can help to follow the lead of successful investors. Warren Buffett has a long history of market success and his investing strategies can ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2023/01/04/down-this-year-warren-buffett-stock-smart-buy/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果","BAC":"美国银行","AMZN":"亚马逊"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2023/01/04/down-this-year-warren-buffett-stock-smart-buy/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2300447122","content_text":"When investors are looking for guidance on stock picks, it can help to follow the lead of successful investors. Warren Buffett has a long history of market success and his investing strategies can point most investors in the right direction. Through his holding company, Berkshire Hathaway, Buffett has achieved success that has made him one of the best-known investors of all time.But just because he's been successful doesn't mean Buffett's investments are foolproof or exempt from market downturns. Like many other investors in 2022, Buffett saw some of his (and Berkshire's) holdings lose value over the past 12 months. Let's take a closer look at three of those picks that lost value in 2022 and whether they are worth buying in 2023.1. AmazonWarren Buffett is known for value investing, a strategy involving finding stocks that are trading below their intrinsic (real) value. For example, if a company's stock price is $200 and an investor believes its intrinsic value is $250, they would invest, hoping to profit from the 25% increase when the market finally prices the stock correctly.Although Amazon didn't fit the mold of a value stock for much of its existence, it's getting closer to matching that description these days. And while Buffett initially avoided the stock because it was so focused on growth, he has grown to love it. Berkshire Hathaway began buying Amazon stocks in 2019 at the direction of one of Buffett's trusted lieutenants, and the Oracle of Omaha admitted he was \"an idiot\" for not buying sooner.Most everyone is familiar with Amazon as an online retailer, but it is becoming more known these days for its somewhat underrated (but lucrative) part of its business -- its cloud computing segment Amazon Web Services (AWS). As of September 2022, AWS controlled around 34% of the cloud market and lead the category by a wide margin. Cloud services are becoming increasingly indispensable for many businesses, and the global cloud market is currently around $480 billion. But it's expected to surpass $1.7 trillion annually by 2029, a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of nearly 20%.E-commerce is Amazon's bread and butter, but AWS is where the profits will be found, especially when you look at its margins. In 2021, AWS accounted for around 13% of Amazon's revenue, but it was responsible for almost three-quarters of its operating profit. Advertising is another segment seeing outsized growth for Amazon, pulling in nearly $10 billion just in its most recent quarter and climbing 25% year over year.Data by YCharts.Amazon's price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio is down over 72% in the past five years, meaning the stock is as cheap as it's been in a while. The stock price was down about 49% in 2022, but very few analysts expect it not to recover those losses. This opportunity could be too good to pass up for long-term investors.2. Bank of AmericaAlthough Berkshire Hathaway stock doesn't pay dividends, dividend stocks make up a good portion of its portfolio, bringing in more than $6 billion in yearly dividend income to the company. One of those dividend cash cows is Bank of America, which Berkshire Hathaway owns over 1.03 billion shares of (it accounts for 11% of Berkshire's portfolio). With a $0.88 yearly dividend per share, Bank of America provides Berkshire Hathaway with over $1 billion in dividend income annually.As with many other companies, it was a rough 2022 for Bank of America, down about 25.6%. While rising interest rates negatively affected the bottom line of many businesses, it was a plus for bank stocks like Bank of America as it increased interest income on the money it lent. In the third quarter of 2022, BofA brought in $13.8 billion in interest income, up 24% year over year and more than half of its $24.5 billion in total revenue. Until inflation is brought under control, those elevated interest rates are likely to remain.As the country's second-largest bank, Bank of America is well-capitalized to handle any adverse economic conditions that could come in 2023. The repercussions of a less-than-ideal economy are likely already priced into the stock, which could mean it'll see brighter days before the overall economy -- especially when investors begin to anticipate better conditions instead of prepping for the worst.Data by YCharts.There's a reason Bank of America is considered a blue chip stock: It's battle-tested and proven. And at current price levels and forward P/E ratios below other competitors, it's a great long-term play for investors with time on their side.3. AppleWith a market cap hovering around the $2 trillion mark, Apple is the world's most valuable company and the largest Berkshire Hathaway holding by market value. It's also a certified cash cow, bringing in over $394.3 billion in revenue in its 2022 fiscal year, up 7.8%, and $100 billion in net income, up 5.4%. It's these kind of metrics that Buffett loves in companies: stable earnings, strong balance sheets, and plenty of profits.Two things make Apple a solid buy right now: an emphasis on making services a bigger part of its revenue and its free cash flow (FCF).The brand loyalty of Apple consumers can't be understated. Once someone is in the company's ecosystem, it's hard to abandon it completely. But part of creating such an effective ecosystem is having the services to complement its hardware products. In its 2022 fiscal year, Apple's services revenue grew by over 14%, compared to just over 6% for its hardware. Services provide roughly one-fifth of the company's revenue, but the steady growth is a positive sign for the future.Data by YCharts.Apple's $111.4 billion in FCF gives it the financial resources to weather any economic storm, and with its stock down nearly 27% in the past 12 months, now could be the time for investing in it or increase a current stake. The company's commitment to innovation will be a growth driver for many years to come.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":177,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9950499363,"gmtCreate":1672799410352,"gmtModify":1676538739182,"author":{"id":"3569303342488537","authorId":"3569303342488537","name":"ColeHii","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":1},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👍","listText":"👍","text":"👍","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":9,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9950499363","repostId":"1105693760","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1105693760","pubTimestamp":1672809228,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1105693760?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2023-01-04 13:13","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Fed Minutes to Reveal Source of Inflation Angst Pushing Up Rates","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1105693760","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"Investors now expect the Fed to return to normal-sized quarter-point rate hikes at its next policy meeting on Jan. 31-Feb. 1, and see the federal funds","content":"<html><head></head><body><ul><li>Powell tied pessimism on outlook for prices to labor strength</li><li>Record of December Fed meeting due out Wednesday in Washington</li></ul><p>The Federal Reserve is set to shed more light on why it’s worried that strong inflation may linger as the US economy moves into the new year.</p><p>At the conclusion of the Dec. 13-14 meeting of the Federal Open Market Committee, policymakers published new projections showing they expected inflation would end 2023 higher than they previously thought. That led to surprisingly widespread support in the projections for the notion that interest rates would need to rise above 5% in 2023.</p><p>The Fed will publish minutes of the meeting on Wednesday at 2 p.m. in Washington.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/da2e89bdb081f6667771899abef61d05\" tg-width=\"620\" tg-height=\"348\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/>Officials saw inflation ending 2023 around 3.1%, according to their median projection, compared with 2.8% in the previous quarterly forecast released in September. The latest Fed outlook is at odds with that of Wall Street, which has generally become more sanguine in recent months as price pressures have started to moderate.</p><p>In his post-meeting press conference, Chair Jerome Powell linked the central bank’s inflation pessimism to ongoing strength in the labor market, pointing to services prices in particular.</p><p>“The inflation forecast being raised was surprising because it sounded like most economists on the street were expecting very little change there, and I was expecting them to cut their forecast,” said Kevin Cummins, the chief US economist at NatWest Markets in Stamford, Connecticut. “It seems that there is more of a consensus view that they’ve got to go above 5% than certainly I would have thought the numbers implied.”</p><p>The Fed is entering 2023 with plenty of resolve to make sure it wins the war on inflation, which in 2022 rose to the highest levels in four decades and then started to decline in the final months of the year.</p><p>The central bank began raising its benchmark interest rate from almost zero in March, which many outsiders criticized as a late start to the tightening cycle. It then picked up the pace with super-sized rate hikes for much of the rest of the year, bringing the federal funds rate to 4.3% — the highest since 2007.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/dababf46c9acd359ad7986d74378d4dc\" tg-width=\"620\" tg-height=\"348\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/>At the December meeting, policymakers opted for a half-point rate hike, following four three-quarter-point moves. But they also signaled another 75 basis points worth of increases this year — more than what Fed watchers had been expecting, given the lower inflation readings in recent months.</p><p>The outlook for interest rates “was pretty hawkish,” and “much more than the market was pricing in,” said Priya Misra, global head of interest rate strategy at TD Securities Inc. in New York.</p><p>She said she will look for signs in the minutes that the committee had shifted its stance on trade-offs between inflation and employment, adding that the big question is: “How much of a rise in unemployment can they tolerate?”</p><p>Investors now expect the Fed to return to normal-sized quarter-point rate hikes at its next policy meeting on Jan. 31-Feb. 1, and see the federal funds rate peaking just below 5% around mid-year, according to futures contracts.</p><p>What Bloomberg Economics Says...</p><blockquote>“Minutes of the Dec. 13-14 meeting will likely show that it was concern about the labor market not cooling fast enough that drove 17 of 19 FOMC participants to write down a terminal rate above 5% in the updated dot plot. That would be a sharp turnaround from the dovish November minutes, which showed several policymakers opining on the risks of overtightening.” — Anna Wong (chief US economist)</blockquote><p>That expectation was bolstered by the most recent reading on price pressures published by the Commerce Department on Dec. 23, which showed so-called core inflation — excluding food and energy — rose just 0.2% in November. That was less than what was implied by the Fed’s latest projections, and monthly readings of a similar size going forward would be consistent with a return to the central bank’s 2% target.</p><p>But, as Powell made clear, the Labor Department’s monthly jobs report due out on Friday will also be an important factor in the February decision. Forecasters expect that report to show job growth moderated to 200,000 last month, according to a Bloomberg poll. Unemployment is expected to have remained unchanged at 3.7% and wage growth is seen as having ticked down to 5% on a year-over-year basis.</p><p>“No matter how you slice the labor market, it is strong. That is what got people exercised,” said Mark Spindel, the chief investment officer at Chicago-based MBB Capital Partners LLC.</p><p>Spindel also said he will be looking for clues about the Fed’s tolerance for the risk of even higher unemployment than the 4.6% rate it projected for 2023 and 2024, which is almost a full percentage point higher than the current rate.</p><p>“It’s going to be trickier” to achieve a soft landing for the economy in 2023 if the Fed follows through on its tightening plans, said Spindel. Given their blunt policy tool, “they are butchers, not surgeons.”</p></body></html>","source":"lsy1584095487587","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Fed Minutes to Reveal Source of Inflation Angst Pushing Up Rates</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFed Minutes to Reveal Source of Inflation Angst Pushing Up Rates\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2023-01-04 13:13 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-01-04/fed-minutes-to-reveal-source-of-inflation-angst-pushing-up-rates?srnd=markets-vp><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Powell tied pessimism on outlook for prices to labor strengthRecord of December Fed meeting due out Wednesday in WashingtonThe Federal Reserve is set to shed more light on why it’s worried that strong...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-01-04/fed-minutes-to-reveal-source-of-inflation-angst-pushing-up-rates?srnd=markets-vp\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-01-04/fed-minutes-to-reveal-source-of-inflation-angst-pushing-up-rates?srnd=markets-vp","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1105693760","content_text":"Powell tied pessimism on outlook for prices to labor strengthRecord of December Fed meeting due out Wednesday in WashingtonThe Federal Reserve is set to shed more light on why it’s worried that strong inflation may linger as the US economy moves into the new year.At the conclusion of the Dec. 13-14 meeting of the Federal Open Market Committee, policymakers published new projections showing they expected inflation would end 2023 higher than they previously thought. That led to surprisingly widespread support in the projections for the notion that interest rates would need to rise above 5% in 2023.The Fed will publish minutes of the meeting on Wednesday at 2 p.m. in Washington.Officials saw inflation ending 2023 around 3.1%, according to their median projection, compared with 2.8% in the previous quarterly forecast released in September. The latest Fed outlook is at odds with that of Wall Street, which has generally become more sanguine in recent months as price pressures have started to moderate.In his post-meeting press conference, Chair Jerome Powell linked the central bank’s inflation pessimism to ongoing strength in the labor market, pointing to services prices in particular.“The inflation forecast being raised was surprising because it sounded like most economists on the street were expecting very little change there, and I was expecting them to cut their forecast,” said Kevin Cummins, the chief US economist at NatWest Markets in Stamford, Connecticut. “It seems that there is more of a consensus view that they’ve got to go above 5% than certainly I would have thought the numbers implied.”The Fed is entering 2023 with plenty of resolve to make sure it wins the war on inflation, which in 2022 rose to the highest levels in four decades and then started to decline in the final months of the year.The central bank began raising its benchmark interest rate from almost zero in March, which many outsiders criticized as a late start to the tightening cycle. It then picked up the pace with super-sized rate hikes for much of the rest of the year, bringing the federal funds rate to 4.3% — the highest since 2007.At the December meeting, policymakers opted for a half-point rate hike, following four three-quarter-point moves. But they also signaled another 75 basis points worth of increases this year — more than what Fed watchers had been expecting, given the lower inflation readings in recent months.The outlook for interest rates “was pretty hawkish,” and “much more than the market was pricing in,” said Priya Misra, global head of interest rate strategy at TD Securities Inc. in New York.She said she will look for signs in the minutes that the committee had shifted its stance on trade-offs between inflation and employment, adding that the big question is: “How much of a rise in unemployment can they tolerate?”Investors now expect the Fed to return to normal-sized quarter-point rate hikes at its next policy meeting on Jan. 31-Feb. 1, and see the federal funds rate peaking just below 5% around mid-year, according to futures contracts.What Bloomberg Economics Says...“Minutes of the Dec. 13-14 meeting will likely show that it was concern about the labor market not cooling fast enough that drove 17 of 19 FOMC participants to write down a terminal rate above 5% in the updated dot plot. That would be a sharp turnaround from the dovish November minutes, which showed several policymakers opining on the risks of overtightening.” — Anna Wong (chief US economist)That expectation was bolstered by the most recent reading on price pressures published by the Commerce Department on Dec. 23, which showed so-called core inflation — excluding food and energy — rose just 0.2% in November. That was less than what was implied by the Fed’s latest projections, and monthly readings of a similar size going forward would be consistent with a return to the central bank’s 2% target.But, as Powell made clear, the Labor Department’s monthly jobs report due out on Friday will also be an important factor in the February decision. Forecasters expect that report to show job growth moderated to 200,000 last month, according to a Bloomberg poll. Unemployment is expected to have remained unchanged at 3.7% and wage growth is seen as having ticked down to 5% on a year-over-year basis.“No matter how you slice the labor market, it is strong. That is what got people exercised,” said Mark Spindel, the chief investment officer at Chicago-based MBB Capital Partners LLC.Spindel also said he will be looking for clues about the Fed’s tolerance for the risk of even higher unemployment than the 4.6% rate it projected for 2023 and 2024, which is almost a full percentage point higher than the current rate.“It’s going to be trickier” to achieve a soft landing for the economy in 2023 if the Fed follows through on its tightening plans, said Spindel. Given their blunt policy tool, “they are butchers, not surgeons.”","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":122,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9950169533,"gmtCreate":1672702879023,"gmtModify":1676538721360,"author":{"id":"3569303342488537","authorId":"3569303342488537","name":"ColeHii","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":1},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👍","listText":"👍","text":"👍","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":8,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9950169533","repostId":"1177934568","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1177934568","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1672701185,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1177934568?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2023-01-03 07:13","market":"us","language":"en","title":"2022 Recap: Futures Market Performance","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1177934568","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Nickel future soared over 44% as global demand for nickel rose on EV boom. Brent gained 11% while U.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Nickel future soared over 44% as global demand for nickel rose on EV boom. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/FUT/BZmain\">Brent</a> gained 11% while <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/FUT/CLmain\">U.S. crude</a> rose nearly 7%. Bitcoin future tumbled 64% amid a rough year for crypto prices.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c073bd641dd79c00725468ff45e05962\" tg-width=\"750\" tg-height=\"1580\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/>The market for nickel is already being transformed as car batteries take over from stainless steel as the major growth market. The world’s biggest miner predicts nine in 10 cars sold by 2040 will be EVs, helping to boost worldwide usage of key battery materials including nickel.</p><p>Oil prices swung wildly in 2022, climbing on tight supplies amid the war in Ukraine, then sliding on worries of an economic contraction, but closed the year with a second straight annual gain.</p><p>Prices surged in March as Russia&#39;s invasion of Ukraine upended global crude flows, with international benchmark Brent reaching $139.13 a barrel, highest since 2008. Prices cooled rapidly in the second half as central banks hiked interest rates and fanned worries of recession.</p><p>&#34;This has been an extraordinary year for commodity markets, with supply risks leading to increased volatility and elevated prices,&#34; said ING analyst Ewa Manthey. &#34;Next year is set to be another year of uncertainty, with plenty of volatility,&#34; she said.</p><p>For the year, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/FUT/BZmain\">Brent</a> gained about 11%. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/FUT/CLmain\">U.S. crude</a> rose nearly 7% in 2022. Both benchmarks fell sharply in 2020 as the COVID-19 pandemic slashed fuel demand. Investors in 2023 are expected to keep taking a cautious approach, wary of interest rate hikes and possible recessions.</p><p>Natural gas markets ended 2022 with strong gains after a global energy crisis triggered by the Russia-Ukraine war stoked prices, and tighter supplies expected in 2023 could fuel more gains. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/FUT/NGmain\">U.S. gas futures</a> jumped by 17.8%, up for a third consecutive year.</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/FUT/ZSmain\">Soybeans</a> and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/FUT/ZCmain\">corn</a> both ended the year up around 14%, as severe drought in Argentina raised concerns about South America&#39;s crop. Going forward, food-commodity prices are likely to stay elevated. Wheat production is unlikely to replenish depleted world inventories, at least in the first half of 2023, while crops producing edible oils are suffering from adverse weather in Latin America and Southeast Asia.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>2022 Recap: Futures Market Performance</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n2022 Recap: Futures Market Performance\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2023-01-03 07:13</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>Nickel future soared over 44% as global demand for nickel rose on EV boom. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/FUT/BZmain\">Brent</a> gained 11% while <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/FUT/CLmain\">U.S. crude</a> rose nearly 7%. Bitcoin future tumbled 64% amid a rough year for crypto prices.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c073bd641dd79c00725468ff45e05962\" tg-width=\"750\" tg-height=\"1580\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/>The market for nickel is already being transformed as car batteries take over from stainless steel as the major growth market. The world’s biggest miner predicts nine in 10 cars sold by 2040 will be EVs, helping to boost worldwide usage of key battery materials including nickel.</p><p>Oil prices swung wildly in 2022, climbing on tight supplies amid the war in Ukraine, then sliding on worries of an economic contraction, but closed the year with a second straight annual gain.</p><p>Prices surged in March as Russia&#39;s invasion of Ukraine upended global crude flows, with international benchmark Brent reaching $139.13 a barrel, highest since 2008. Prices cooled rapidly in the second half as central banks hiked interest rates and fanned worries of recession.</p><p>&#34;This has been an extraordinary year for commodity markets, with supply risks leading to increased volatility and elevated prices,&#34; said ING analyst Ewa Manthey. &#34;Next year is set to be another year of uncertainty, with plenty of volatility,&#34; she said.</p><p>For the year, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/FUT/BZmain\">Brent</a> gained about 11%. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/FUT/CLmain\">U.S. crude</a> rose nearly 7% in 2022. Both benchmarks fell sharply in 2020 as the COVID-19 pandemic slashed fuel demand. Investors in 2023 are expected to keep taking a cautious approach, wary of interest rate hikes and possible recessions.</p><p>Natural gas markets ended 2022 with strong gains after a global energy crisis triggered by the Russia-Ukraine war stoked prices, and tighter supplies expected in 2023 could fuel more gains. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/FUT/NGmain\">U.S. gas futures</a> jumped by 17.8%, up for a third consecutive year.</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/FUT/ZSmain\">Soybeans</a> and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/FUT/ZCmain\">corn</a> both ended the year up around 14%, as severe drought in Argentina raised concerns about South America&#39;s crop. Going forward, food-commodity prices are likely to stay elevated. Wheat production is unlikely to replenish depleted world inventories, at least in the first half of 2023, while crops producing edible oils are suffering from adverse weather in Latin America and Southeast Asia.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1177934568","content_text":"Nickel future soared over 44% as global demand for nickel rose on EV boom. Brent gained 11% while U.S. crude rose nearly 7%. Bitcoin future tumbled 64% amid a rough year for crypto prices.The market for nickel is already being transformed as car batteries take over from stainless steel as the major growth market. The world’s biggest miner predicts nine in 10 cars sold by 2040 will be EVs, helping to boost worldwide usage of key battery materials including nickel.Oil prices swung wildly in 2022, climbing on tight supplies amid the war in Ukraine, then sliding on worries of an economic contraction, but closed the year with a second straight annual gain.Prices surged in March as Russia's invasion of Ukraine upended global crude flows, with international benchmark Brent reaching $139.13 a barrel, highest since 2008. Prices cooled rapidly in the second half as central banks hiked interest rates and fanned worries of recession.\"This has been an extraordinary year for commodity markets, with supply risks leading to increased volatility and elevated prices,\" said ING analyst Ewa Manthey. \"Next year is set to be another year of uncertainty, with plenty of volatility,\" she said.For the year, Brent gained about 11%. U.S. crude rose nearly 7% in 2022. Both benchmarks fell sharply in 2020 as the COVID-19 pandemic slashed fuel demand. Investors in 2023 are expected to keep taking a cautious approach, wary of interest rate hikes and possible recessions.Natural gas markets ended 2022 with strong gains after a global energy crisis triggered by the Russia-Ukraine war stoked prices, and tighter supplies expected in 2023 could fuel more gains. U.S. gas futures jumped by 17.8%, up for a third consecutive year.Soybeans and corn both ended the year up around 14%, as severe drought in Argentina raised concerns about South America's crop. Going forward, food-commodity prices are likely to stay elevated. Wheat production is unlikely to replenish depleted world inventories, at least in the first half of 2023, while crops producing edible oils are suffering from adverse weather in Latin America and Southeast Asia.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":167,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9950921333,"gmtCreate":1672646691322,"gmtModify":1676538715564,"author":{"id":"3569303342488537","authorId":"3569303342488537","name":"ColeHii","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":1},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👍","listText":"👍","text":"👍","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9950921333","repostId":"2300611828","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2300611828","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1672619433,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2300611828?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2023-01-02 08:30","market":"us","language":"en","title":"New Year's Market Closing, Jobs Data, Fed Minutes, and More for Investors to Watch This Week","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2300611828","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"By Nicholas Jasinski \n\n\n     It will be another holiday-shortened trading week, with stock and bond ","content":"<font class=\"NormalMinus1\" face=\"Arial\">\n<pre>\nBy Nicholas Jasinski \n</pre>\n<p>\n     It will be another holiday-shortened trading week, with stock and bond markets closed on Monday in observance of New Year's Day. Once Wall Street returns, there will be a handful of notable earnings releases and December jobs data to look forward to. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Earnings will be clustered on Thursday: Conagra Brands, Constellation Brands, Lamb Weston Holdings, and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/WBA\">Walgreens Boots Alliance</a> all report. Fourth-quarter earnings season kicks off with results from several big banks on Jan. 13. \n</p>\n<p>\n     The economic-data highlight of the week will be jobs Friday. The Bureau of Labor Statistics is expected to report a gain of 217,500 nonfarm payrolls in December, following an increase of 263,000 in November. The unemployment rate is forecast to hold steady at a historically low 3.7%. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Economists will also be watching the BLS' Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey on Tuesday. The consensus estimate calls for 10 million job openings on the last business day of November, which would be 334,000 fewer than in October. \n</p>\n<p>\n     A looser job market is a key for the Federal Reserve. Economists will look to glean insights from the minutes from the Federal Open Market Committee's mid-December monetary-policy meeting, which will be released on Tuesday. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Also on Tuesday, the Institute for Supply Management will report its Manufacturing Purchasing Managers' Index for December, followed by the Services equivalent on Friday. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Monday \n</p>\n<p>\n     Markets around the globe, including in the U.S., Canada, China, Japan, and the United Kingdom, are closed in observance of New Year's Day. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Tuesday 1/3 \n</p>\n<p>\n     The Census Bureau reports construction spending statistics for November. The consensus estimate is for total construction spending to decline 0.4%, month over month, to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of $1.79 trillion. Despite the slowdown in the housing market, construction spending remains near its record peak of $1.82 trillion, hit last July. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Wednesday 1/4 \n</p>\n<p>\n     The Federal Open Market Committee releases the minutes from its mid-December monetary-policy meeting. The FOMC raised the federal funds rates at its last seven meetings in 2022, for a total of 4.25 percentage points, the most since 1980. \n</p>\n<p>\n     The Bureau of Labor Statistics releases the Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey. Economists forecast 10 million job openings on the last business day of November, 334,000 fewer than in October. There are currently 1.7 job openings for every person seeking employment, something that Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell has stressed needs to come into better balance. \n</p>\n<p>\n     The Institute for Supply Management releases its Manufacturing Purchasing Managers' Index for December. Expectations are for a 48 reading, one point lower than in November. The index fell below 50 in November for the first time since May of 2020, indicating that the U.S. manufacturing sector is contracting. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Thursday 1/5 \n</p>\n<p>\n     ADP releases its National Employment Report for December. The economy is expected to add 145,000 private-sector jobs, after a 127,000 gain in November. Job growth has slowed from first-half 2022's rapid pace. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Conagra Brands, Constellation Brands, Lamb Weston Holdings, and Walgreens Boots Alliance report quarterly results. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Costco Wholesale reports December revenue data. On Nov. 30, the discount warehouse retailer reported slower-than-expected same-stores sales growth for the month, leading to a 6.6% decline in the stock on the following day. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Friday 1/6 \n</p>\n<p>\n     The BLS releases the jobs report for December. The consensus estimate is for an increase of 217,500 nonfarm payrolls, following a gain of 263,000 in November. The unemployment rate is seen remaining unchanged at a historically low 3.7%. Average hourly earnings are expected to increase 5%, year over year, after rising 5.1% in the previous month. \n</p>\n<p>\n     The ISM releases its Services PMI for December. The consensus call is for a 54.5 reading, two points lower than in November. The services sector has held up better than the manufacturing sector, as shown by the respective PMIs, as consumers reverse the pandemic stay-at-home trend of spending more on goods than on services. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Write to Nicholas Jasinski at nicholas.jasinski@barrons.com \n</p>\n<pre>\n \n</pre>\n<p>\n  (END) Dow Jones Newswires\n</p>\n<p>\n  January 02, 2023 21:14 ET (02:14 GMT)\n</p>\n<p>\n  Copyright (c) 2023 Dow Jones &amp; Company, Inc.\n</p>\n</font>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>New Year's Market Closing, Jobs Data, Fed Minutes, and More for Investors to Watch This Week</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nNew Year's Market Closing, Jobs Data, Fed Minutes, and More for Investors to Watch This Week\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2023-01-02 08:30</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<font class=\"NormalMinus1\" face=\"Arial\">\n<pre>\nBy Nicholas Jasinski \n</pre>\n<p>\n     It will be another holiday-shortened trading week, with stock and bond markets closed on Monday in observance of New Year's Day. Once Wall Street returns, there will be a handful of notable earnings releases and December jobs data to look forward to. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Earnings will be clustered on Thursday: Conagra Brands, Constellation Brands, Lamb Weston Holdings, and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/WBA\">Walgreens Boots Alliance</a> all report. Fourth-quarter earnings season kicks off with results from several big banks on Jan. 13. \n</p>\n<p>\n     The economic-data highlight of the week will be jobs Friday. The Bureau of Labor Statistics is expected to report a gain of 217,500 nonfarm payrolls in December, following an increase of 263,000 in November. The unemployment rate is forecast to hold steady at a historically low 3.7%. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Economists will also be watching the BLS' Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey on Tuesday. The consensus estimate calls for 10 million job openings on the last business day of November, which would be 334,000 fewer than in October. \n</p>\n<p>\n     A looser job market is a key for the Federal Reserve. Economists will look to glean insights from the minutes from the Federal Open Market Committee's mid-December monetary-policy meeting, which will be released on Tuesday. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Also on Tuesday, the Institute for Supply Management will report its Manufacturing Purchasing Managers' Index for December, followed by the Services equivalent on Friday. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Monday \n</p>\n<p>\n     Markets around the globe, including in the U.S., Canada, China, Japan, and the United Kingdom, are closed in observance of New Year's Day. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Tuesday 1/3 \n</p>\n<p>\n     The Census Bureau reports construction spending statistics for November. The consensus estimate is for total construction spending to decline 0.4%, month over month, to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of $1.79 trillion. Despite the slowdown in the housing market, construction spending remains near its record peak of $1.82 trillion, hit last July. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Wednesday 1/4 \n</p>\n<p>\n     The Federal Open Market Committee releases the minutes from its mid-December monetary-policy meeting. The FOMC raised the federal funds rates at its last seven meetings in 2022, for a total of 4.25 percentage points, the most since 1980. \n</p>\n<p>\n     The Bureau of Labor Statistics releases the Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey. Economists forecast 10 million job openings on the last business day of November, 334,000 fewer than in October. There are currently 1.7 job openings for every person seeking employment, something that Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell has stressed needs to come into better balance. \n</p>\n<p>\n     The Institute for Supply Management releases its Manufacturing Purchasing Managers' Index for December. Expectations are for a 48 reading, one point lower than in November. The index fell below 50 in November for the first time since May of 2020, indicating that the U.S. manufacturing sector is contracting. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Thursday 1/5 \n</p>\n<p>\n     ADP releases its National Employment Report for December. The economy is expected to add 145,000 private-sector jobs, after a 127,000 gain in November. Job growth has slowed from first-half 2022's rapid pace. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Conagra Brands, Constellation Brands, Lamb Weston Holdings, and Walgreens Boots Alliance report quarterly results. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Costco Wholesale reports December revenue data. On Nov. 30, the discount warehouse retailer reported slower-than-expected same-stores sales growth for the month, leading to a 6.6% decline in the stock on the following day. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Friday 1/6 \n</p>\n<p>\n     The BLS releases the jobs report for December. The consensus estimate is for an increase of 217,500 nonfarm payrolls, following a gain of 263,000 in November. The unemployment rate is seen remaining unchanged at a historically low 3.7%. Average hourly earnings are expected to increase 5%, year over year, after rising 5.1% in the previous month. \n</p>\n<p>\n     The ISM releases its Services PMI for December. The consensus call is for a 54.5 reading, two points lower than in November. The services sector has held up better than the manufacturing sector, as shown by the respective PMIs, as consumers reverse the pandemic stay-at-home trend of spending more on goods than on services. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Write to Nicholas Jasinski at nicholas.jasinski@barrons.com \n</p>\n<pre>\n \n</pre>\n<p>\n  (END) Dow Jones Newswires\n</p>\n<p>\n  January 02, 2023 21:14 ET (02:14 GMT)\n</p>\n<p>\n  Copyright (c) 2023 Dow Jones &amp; Company, Inc.\n</p>\n</font>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BK4155":"大卖场与超市","BK4504":"桥水持仓","BK4581":"高盛持仓","LU0820561818.USD":"安联收益及增长平衡基金Cl AM DIS","LU0738911758.USD":"Blackrock Global Equity Income A6 USD","IE00BKVL7J92.USD":"Legg Mason ClearBridge - US Equity Sustainability Leaders A Acc USD","LU1551013425.SGD":"Allianz Income and Growth Cl AMg2 DIS H2-SGD","LU0256863811.USD":"ALLIANZ US EQUITY \"A\" INC","LU1571399168.USD":"ALLSPRING GLOBAL LONG/SHORT EQUITY \"IP\" (USD) ACC","LU1878469433.USD":"THREADNEEDLE (LUX) - AMERICAN SMALLER COMPANIES \"A\" (USD) ACC","BK4017":"黄金",".DJI":"道琼斯","SG9999003800.SGD":"Nikko AM Global Dividend Equity Acc SGD-H","BK4169":"酿酒商与葡萄酒商","LU0943347566.SGD":"安联收益及增长平衡基金AM H2-SGD",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite","BK4212":"包装食品与肉类","LU0417517546.SGD":"Allianz US Equity Cl AT Acc SGD","LU1506573853.SGD":"MANULIFE GF GLOBAL EQUITY \"AA\" (SGD) INC",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","BK4570":"地缘局势概念股","LU2360032135.SGD":"ALLSPRING GLOBAL EQUITY ENHANCED INCOME \"A\" (SGDHDG) INC","LU0079474960.USD":"联博美国增长基金A","LU1551013342.USD":"Allianz Income and Growth Cl AMg2 DIS USD","BK4585":"ETF&股票定投概念","LU2095319765.USD":"Natixis Thematics Subscription Economy R/A USD","LU2125154778.USD":"ALLSPRING GLOBAL EQUITY ENHANCED INCOME \"A\" (USD) INC","BK4533":"AQR资本管理(全球第二大对冲基金)","BK4075":"烟草","LU2210150020.SGD":"Natixis Thematics Subscription Economy R/A SGD","SG9999011175.SGD":"Nikko AM Global Dividend Equity Dis SGD-H","LU0820561909.HKD":"ALLIANZ INCOME AND GROWTH \"AM\" (HKD) INC","BK4566":"资本集团","BK4211":"区域性银行","LU2210149790.SGD":"Natixis Thematics Subscription Economy R/A SGD-H","LU2125154935.USD":"ALLSPRING (LUX) WF GLOBAL EQUITY ENHANCED INCOME \"I\" (USD) INC","BK4524":"宅经济概念","LU0661504455.SGD":"Blackrock Global Equity Income A5 SGD-H","IE00BZ1G4Q59.USD":"LEGG MASON CLEARBRIDGE US EQUITY SUSTAINABILITY LEADER \"A\"(USD) INC (A)","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓","LU0689472784.USD":"安联收益及增长基金Cl AM AT Acc","LU0949170772.SGD":"Blackrock Global Equity Income A6 SGD-H"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2300611828","content_text":"By Nicholas Jasinski \n\n\n     It will be another holiday-shortened trading week, with stock and bond markets closed on Monday in observance of New Year's Day. Once Wall Street returns, there will be a handful of notable earnings releases and December jobs data to look forward to. \n\n\n     Earnings will be clustered on Thursday: Conagra Brands, Constellation Brands, Lamb Weston Holdings, and Walgreens Boots Alliance all report. Fourth-quarter earnings season kicks off with results from several big banks on Jan. 13. \n\n\n     The economic-data highlight of the week will be jobs Friday. The Bureau of Labor Statistics is expected to report a gain of 217,500 nonfarm payrolls in December, following an increase of 263,000 in November. The unemployment rate is forecast to hold steady at a historically low 3.7%. \n\n\n     Economists will also be watching the BLS' Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey on Tuesday. The consensus estimate calls for 10 million job openings on the last business day of November, which would be 334,000 fewer than in October. \n\n\n     A looser job market is a key for the Federal Reserve. Economists will look to glean insights from the minutes from the Federal Open Market Committee's mid-December monetary-policy meeting, which will be released on Tuesday. \n\n\n     Also on Tuesday, the Institute for Supply Management will report its Manufacturing Purchasing Managers' Index for December, followed by the Services equivalent on Friday. \n\n\n     Monday \n\n\n     Markets around the globe, including in the U.S., Canada, China, Japan, and the United Kingdom, are closed in observance of New Year's Day. \n\n\n     Tuesday 1/3 \n\n\n     The Census Bureau reports construction spending statistics for November. The consensus estimate is for total construction spending to decline 0.4%, month over month, to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of $1.79 trillion. Despite the slowdown in the housing market, construction spending remains near its record peak of $1.82 trillion, hit last July. \n\n\n     Wednesday 1/4 \n\n\n     The Federal Open Market Committee releases the minutes from its mid-December monetary-policy meeting. The FOMC raised the federal funds rates at its last seven meetings in 2022, for a total of 4.25 percentage points, the most since 1980. \n\n\n     The Bureau of Labor Statistics releases the Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey. Economists forecast 10 million job openings on the last business day of November, 334,000 fewer than in October. There are currently 1.7 job openings for every person seeking employment, something that Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell has stressed needs to come into better balance. \n\n\n     The Institute for Supply Management releases its Manufacturing Purchasing Managers' Index for December. Expectations are for a 48 reading, one point lower than in November. The index fell below 50 in November for the first time since May of 2020, indicating that the U.S. manufacturing sector is contracting. \n\n\n     Thursday 1/5 \n\n\n     ADP releases its National Employment Report for December. The economy is expected to add 145,000 private-sector jobs, after a 127,000 gain in November. Job growth has slowed from first-half 2022's rapid pace. \n\n\n     Conagra Brands, Constellation Brands, Lamb Weston Holdings, and Walgreens Boots Alliance report quarterly results. \n\n\n     Costco Wholesale reports December revenue data. On Nov. 30, the discount warehouse retailer reported slower-than-expected same-stores sales growth for the month, leading to a 6.6% decline in the stock on the following day. \n\n\n     Friday 1/6 \n\n\n     The BLS releases the jobs report for December. The consensus estimate is for an increase of 217,500 nonfarm payrolls, following a gain of 263,000 in November. The unemployment rate is seen remaining unchanged at a historically low 3.7%. Average hourly earnings are expected to increase 5%, year over year, after rising 5.1% in the previous month. \n\n\n     The ISM releases its Services PMI for December. The consensus call is for a 54.5 reading, two points lower than in November. The services sector has held up better than the manufacturing sector, as shown by the respective PMIs, as consumers reverse the pandemic stay-at-home trend of spending more on goods than on services. \n\n\n     Write to Nicholas Jasinski at nicholas.jasinski@barrons.com \n\n\n \n\n\n  (END) Dow Jones Newswires\n\n\n  January 02, 2023 21:14 ET (02:14 GMT)\n\n\n  Copyright (c) 2023 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":235,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9927426495,"gmtCreate":1672567540017,"gmtModify":1676538706042,"author":{"id":"3569303342488537","authorId":"3569303342488537","name":"ColeHii","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":1},"themes":[],"htmlText":"🎉","listText":"🎉","text":"🎉","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9927426495","repostId":"1113081958","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1113081958","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1672535370,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1113081958?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2023-01-01 09:09","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Reminder: U.S. Market Closed for New Year's Day on Monday, Jan. 2, 2023","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1113081958","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"The New Year has arrived, please take note of the trading hours during the holiday period and make n","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a3325f9177c7cac9e0526b4554c62cd7\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"360\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>The New Year has arrived, please take note of the trading hours during the holiday period and make necessary preparations in advance.</p><p>The U.S. market will be closed at local time on Monday, Jan. 2, 2023.</p><p>The Singapore market will be closed at local time on Monday, Jan. 2, 2023.</p><p>The Hong Kong market will be closed at local time on Monday, Jan. 2, 2023.</p><p>The Australian market will be closed at local time on Monday, Jan. 2, 2023.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Reminder: U.S. Market Closed for New Year's Day on Monday, Jan. 2, 2023</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nReminder: U.S. Market Closed for New Year's Day on Monday, Jan. 2, 2023\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2023-01-01 09:09</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a3325f9177c7cac9e0526b4554c62cd7\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"360\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>The New Year has arrived, please take note of the trading hours during the holiday period and make necessary preparations in advance.</p><p>The U.S. market will be closed at local time on Monday, Jan. 2, 2023.</p><p>The Singapore market will be closed at local time on Monday, Jan. 2, 2023.</p><p>The Hong Kong market will be closed at local time on Monday, Jan. 2, 2023.</p><p>The Australian market will be closed at local time on Monday, Jan. 2, 2023.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1113081958","content_text":"The New Year has arrived, please take note of the trading hours during the holiday period and make necessary preparations in advance.The U.S. market will be closed at local time on Monday, Jan. 2, 2023.The Singapore market will be closed at local time on Monday, Jan. 2, 2023.The Hong Kong market will be closed at local time on Monday, Jan. 2, 2023.The Australian market will be closed at local time on Monday, Jan. 2, 2023.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":140,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9927388349,"gmtCreate":1672399202881,"gmtModify":1676538685246,"author":{"id":"3569303342488537","authorId":"3569303342488537","name":"ColeHii","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":1},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👍","listText":"👍","text":"👍","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":14,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9927388349","repostId":"2295113789","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2295113789","pubTimestamp":1672394307,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2295113789?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-12-30 17:58","market":"us","language":"en","title":"2 No-Brainer Warren Buffett Stocks to Buy Hand Over Fist for 2023","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2295113789","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Amazon and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing are available at attractive valuations.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>The Federal Reserve gave the stock market a shock recently as the central bank raised interest rates once again, taking its benchmark rate to its highest level in 15 years. The Fed also suggested that it would keep raising rates in 2023 to bring down inflation.</p><p>The Fed&#39;s hawkish stance sent equities tumbling, as it was expected that the central bank would dial down rate increases in 2023 thanks to signs of cooling inflation. A high-interest-rate environment has been the stock market&#39;s undoing in 2022. The Fed would need more proof that inflation is cooling in a sustained manner.</p><p>It could get that evidence in 2023, as inflation is expected to drop to 3.2% by the end of 2023, which would be a substantial decline from 7.1% in November 2022. So it won&#39;t be surprising to see the Fed adopt a dovish stance as 2023 progresses. That&#39;s why now may be a good time to buy some beaten-down stocks from Warren Buffett&#39;s portfolio.</p><p>The <b>Berkshire Hathaway</b> CEO has been active in the stock market this year despite the gloom, suggesting that he&#39;s busy putting his money to work by buying solid companies for the long run. Here are two stocks from Berkshire&#39;s portfolio that investors may want to buy while they&#39;re still down, as they could turn out to be big winners in the long run.</p><h2>1. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMZN\">Amazon</a></h2><p>E-commerce and technology giant <b>Amazon</b> has lost half of its value on the stock market this year. The company&#39;s growth has lagged thanks to a slowdown in e-commerce sales on account of surging inflation.</p><p>But with inflation expected to cool down substantially in 2023, the e-commerce business can be expected to step on the gas once again. This explains why Amazon&#39;s earnings are estimated to jump substantially next year following a sharp drop in 2022. More specifically, Amazon is expected to finish 2022 with a loss of $0.09 per share, compared with a profit of $3.24 per share in 2021, but the forecast for 2023 and 2024 shows major improvements are in the cards.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7ef8b659184ae00c4a96f8c33905911b\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"387\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>AMZN EPS Estimates for Current Fiscal Year data by YCharts</p><p>It is estimated that global e-commerce spending could rise to $6.5 trillion in 2023 from $5.7 trillion in 2022. That would be a nice improvement over this year&#39;s estimated decline of nearly 10%. On the other hand, Amazon&#39;s entry into a lucrative market such as advertising should be another key catalyst for the company in 2023.</p><p>Amazon&#39;s advertising revenue jumped 25% year over year in the third quarter of 2022 to $9.5 billion. Although that was less than 10% of the company&#39;s total revenue of $127 billion, it could move the needle in a bigger way for the company. Amazon&#39;s 2022 ad revenue is expected to land at $38 billion. By 2026, this figure is expected to jump to $64 billion. Throw in other growth drivers such as cloud computing, an area where Amazon dominates, and it is easy to see why the company is expected to clock 26% annual earnings growth for the next five years.</p><p>So this Warren Buffett stock could run higher in 2023 and beyond, which is why investors may want to buy it right now, as it&#39;s trading at just 1.7 times sales, which represents a discount to the <b>S&amp;P 500</b>&#39;s price-to-sales ratio of 2.3.</p><h2>2. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSM\">Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing</a></h2><p><b>Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing</b> -- better known as TSMC -- is one of the latest additions to Buffett&#39;s portfolio. The Oracle of Omaha revealed a $4.1 billion stake in TSMC recently, and it&#39;s not surprising to see why the foundry giant has made its way into Berkshire&#39;s portfolio.</p><p>TSMC&#39;s 43% slide in 2022 means it&#39;s available at an attractive valuation. TSMC is trading at less than 14 times trailing earnings. That&#39;s lower than the S&amp;P 500&#39;s earnings multiple of 18. Buying this semiconductor stock at this valuation looks like a no-brainer, given the terrific growth opportunity it&#39;s sitting on.</p><p>With TSMC&#39;s earnings estimated to increase at an annual pace of over 21% over the next five years, investors can consider buying it hand over fist considering the cheap valuation. After all, TSMC is the world&#39;s biggest semiconductor foundry and controls 56% share of this space, according to Counterpoint Research.</p><p>This impressive market share puts the company in a solid position to take advantage of the secular growth in semiconductors. Global semiconductor sales are estimated to exceed $1 trillion in annual revenue by 2030, up from $600 billion in 2021. Of course, analysts expect the industry to hit a speed bump in 2023, with industry revenue expected to decline 3.6%, but TSMC can sustain its impressive growth despite that.</p><p>TSMC&#39;s revenue has jumped nearly 45% in the first 11 months of 2022 compared with the prior-year period. That&#39;s well above the 4% growth that the global semiconductor market is expected to reach in 2022. TSMC&#39;s diversified end markets and its dominance of the foundry market have allowed it to enjoy terrific growth in 2022, and the company&#39;s investments in advanced technologies should help it sustain the same in the future thanks to its secular growth opportunity.</p><p>All this makes TSMC another top Buffett stock that investors may want to buy right now, as it may not be available for cheap once inflation cools down enough and the stock market possibly goes on a bull run in 2023.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>2 No-Brainer Warren Buffett Stocks to Buy Hand Over Fist for 2023</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n2 No-Brainer Warren Buffett Stocks to Buy Hand Over Fist for 2023\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-12-30 17:58 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/12/29/2-no-brainer-warren-buffett-stocks-to-buy-hand-ove/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The Federal Reserve gave the stock market a shock recently as the central bank raised interest rates once again, taking its benchmark rate to its highest level in 15 years. The Fed also suggested that...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/12/29/2-no-brainer-warren-buffett-stocks-to-buy-hand-ove/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AMZN":"亚马逊","TSM":"台积电"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/12/29/2-no-brainer-warren-buffett-stocks-to-buy-hand-ove/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2295113789","content_text":"The Federal Reserve gave the stock market a shock recently as the central bank raised interest rates once again, taking its benchmark rate to its highest level in 15 years. The Fed also suggested that it would keep raising rates in 2023 to bring down inflation.The Fed's hawkish stance sent equities tumbling, as it was expected that the central bank would dial down rate increases in 2023 thanks to signs of cooling inflation. A high-interest-rate environment has been the stock market's undoing in 2022. The Fed would need more proof that inflation is cooling in a sustained manner.It could get that evidence in 2023, as inflation is expected to drop to 3.2% by the end of 2023, which would be a substantial decline from 7.1% in November 2022. So it won't be surprising to see the Fed adopt a dovish stance as 2023 progresses. That's why now may be a good time to buy some beaten-down stocks from Warren Buffett's portfolio.The Berkshire Hathaway CEO has been active in the stock market this year despite the gloom, suggesting that he's busy putting his money to work by buying solid companies for the long run. Here are two stocks from Berkshire's portfolio that investors may want to buy while they're still down, as they could turn out to be big winners in the long run.1. AmazonE-commerce and technology giant Amazon has lost half of its value on the stock market this year. The company's growth has lagged thanks to a slowdown in e-commerce sales on account of surging inflation.But with inflation expected to cool down substantially in 2023, the e-commerce business can be expected to step on the gas once again. This explains why Amazon's earnings are estimated to jump substantially next year following a sharp drop in 2022. More specifically, Amazon is expected to finish 2022 with a loss of $0.09 per share, compared with a profit of $3.24 per share in 2021, but the forecast for 2023 and 2024 shows major improvements are in the cards.AMZN EPS Estimates for Current Fiscal Year data by YChartsIt is estimated that global e-commerce spending could rise to $6.5 trillion in 2023 from $5.7 trillion in 2022. That would be a nice improvement over this year's estimated decline of nearly 10%. On the other hand, Amazon's entry into a lucrative market such as advertising should be another key catalyst for the company in 2023.Amazon's advertising revenue jumped 25% year over year in the third quarter of 2022 to $9.5 billion. Although that was less than 10% of the company's total revenue of $127 billion, it could move the needle in a bigger way for the company. Amazon's 2022 ad revenue is expected to land at $38 billion. By 2026, this figure is expected to jump to $64 billion. Throw in other growth drivers such as cloud computing, an area where Amazon dominates, and it is easy to see why the company is expected to clock 26% annual earnings growth for the next five years.So this Warren Buffett stock could run higher in 2023 and beyond, which is why investors may want to buy it right now, as it's trading at just 1.7 times sales, which represents a discount to the S&P 500's price-to-sales ratio of 2.3.2. Taiwan Semiconductor ManufacturingTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing -- better known as TSMC -- is one of the latest additions to Buffett's portfolio. The Oracle of Omaha revealed a $4.1 billion stake in TSMC recently, and it's not surprising to see why the foundry giant has made its way into Berkshire's portfolio.TSMC's 43% slide in 2022 means it's available at an attractive valuation. TSMC is trading at less than 14 times trailing earnings. That's lower than the S&P 500's earnings multiple of 18. Buying this semiconductor stock at this valuation looks like a no-brainer, given the terrific growth opportunity it's sitting on.With TSMC's earnings estimated to increase at an annual pace of over 21% over the next five years, investors can consider buying it hand over fist considering the cheap valuation. After all, TSMC is the world's biggest semiconductor foundry and controls 56% share of this space, according to Counterpoint Research.This impressive market share puts the company in a solid position to take advantage of the secular growth in semiconductors. Global semiconductor sales are estimated to exceed $1 trillion in annual revenue by 2030, up from $600 billion in 2021. Of course, analysts expect the industry to hit a speed bump in 2023, with industry revenue expected to decline 3.6%, but TSMC can sustain its impressive growth despite that.TSMC's revenue has jumped nearly 45% in the first 11 months of 2022 compared with the prior-year period. That's well above the 4% growth that the global semiconductor market is expected to reach in 2022. TSMC's diversified end markets and its dominance of the foundry market have allowed it to enjoy terrific growth in 2022, and the company's investments in advanced technologies should help it sustain the same in the future thanks to its secular growth opportunity.All this makes TSMC another top Buffett stock that investors may want to buy right now, as it may not be available for cheap once inflation cools down enough and the stock market possibly goes on a bull run in 2023.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":143,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9924543617,"gmtCreate":1672292244839,"gmtModify":1676538667237,"author":{"id":"3569303342488537","authorId":"3569303342488537","name":"ColeHii","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":1},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👍","listText":"👍","text":"👍","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":14,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9924543617","repostId":"1183312159","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1183312159","pubTimestamp":1672282689,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1183312159?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-12-29 10:58","market":"us","language":"en","title":"2023 U.S. Stock Market Predictions: What Will Happen?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1183312159","media":"TipRanks","summary":"Story Highlights2022 was bad for stocks; we are entering the new year with a high level of uncertain","content":"<div>\n<p>Story Highlights2022 was bad for stocks; we are entering the new year with a high level of uncertainty. Investors should consider preparing their portfolios for different scenarios, differentiating ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.tipranks.com/news/article/2023-stock-market-predictions-what-will-happen\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"lsy1606183248679","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>2023 U.S. Stock Market Predictions: What Will Happen?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n2023 U.S. Stock Market Predictions: What Will Happen?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-12-29 10:58 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.tipranks.com/news/article/2023-stock-market-predictions-what-will-happen><strong>TipRanks</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Story Highlights2022 was bad for stocks; we are entering the new year with a high level of uncertainty. Investors should consider preparing their portfolios for different scenarios, differentiating ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.tipranks.com/news/article/2023-stock-market-predictions-what-will-happen\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".DJI":"道琼斯",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index"},"source_url":"https://www.tipranks.com/news/article/2023-stock-market-predictions-what-will-happen","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1183312159","content_text":"Story Highlights2022 was bad for stocks; we are entering the new year with a high level of uncertainty. Investors should consider preparing their portfolios for different scenarios, differentiating their holdings across segments that could maximize their returns against downside and upside factors.2022 will go down in history as one of the worst years for stocks in the last few decades; what will 2023 bring to the markets?Price history of the S&P 500 (SPX) IndexWhich Scenario Looks Right to You?It’s impossible to forecast the near-term path of the markets, but we can try and distinguish trends and upside and downside risks to these trends:Base Case: a mild recession in the first half of 2023, which brings down inflation, letting the Fed ease in the second half; the S&P 500 (SPX) rallies 10%-20%.Bear Case: the Fed over-tightens, sending the economy into a “hard landing,” sending stocks down for the year.Bull Case: the Fed succeeds in bringing down inflation without causing a recession, and stocks rally as they did in 2021.It would be reasonable to work according to the base-case outlook while hedging against different scenarios that might affect some stocks more than others.Base Case: Mild Recession Followed by an UpturnIn the base-case scenario, it would be a no-brainer to buy tech stocks. The decades-long trend of technology entering every layer of human life will continue, and tech stocks will likely shine again.According to Morningstar (NASDAQ: MORN) analysts, large-cap growth stocks are now one of the cheapest segments in the market, having suffered some of the biggest declines. Shares of Meta (NASDAQ: META), Alphabet (NASDAQ: GOOG), Nvidia (NASDAQ: NVDA), Amazon (NASDAQ: AMZN), Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT), and Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL) have suffered staggering losses in 2022 and look strongly undervalued. There’s no doubt that many of the Big Tech companies will see their stock performances improve as the economy mends and sentiment picks up, making their current prices look like decent entry points.Make sure to look beyond the price at the fundamentals, though. After the crazy rally and its bust, investors will be much more skeptical of bombastic growth promises that aren’t underpinned by solid numbers. When optimism returns, it will be much more realistic, at least for a while. So, it’d be a good idea to choose stocks of companies with robust earnings, ample cash, and strong growth prospects.In addition, have a look at another dirt-cheap equity segment: small caps. These stocks suffer in downturns but tend to outperform when the economy improves. Small-cap P/E ratios have reached their lowest levels in two decades, and the recession looks already priced into their valuations.To take advantage of this, you might want to have a look at the shares of Sarepta Therapeutics (NASDAQ: SRPT), Shockwave Medical (NASDAQ: SWAV), Lattice Semiconductor (NASDAQ: LSCC), Pure Storage (NYSE: PSTG), Tetra Tech (NASDAQ: TTEK), or WillScot Mobile Mini Holdings (NASDAQ: WSC), as they look promising.Bear Case: Bad Recession or High Rates for LongerIf you believe that 2023 may turn out to be another “risk-off” year but still want to remain invested, consider picking stocks of companies that don’t depend on cheap funding and are supported by ample cash, strong business models, and dominance in their markets. Dividend-paying companies are preferred; value stocks will likely outperform in this setting. Pay attention to the industries: discretionary products and services take a much bigger hit in recessions than those supplying the necessities.For example, Kraft Heinz (NASDAQ: KHC) is a leader in the packaged food market. It has substantial pricing power and pays stable dividends, which could help hedge against an economic downturn. Occidental Petroleum (NYSE: OXY) has been a great inflation hedge, trading ata P/E ratio of 5.2. Target (NYSE: TGT) is a dividend king with a strong market cap and solid profitability. Another high-dividend stock is Danaher (NYSE: DHR), a stable, diversified conglomerate. Johnson & Johnson (NYSE: JNJ) has plenty of cash, a high dividend yield, and vast market share. Top this list with Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE: BRK.B), the best-run financial conglomerate in the U.S., and you should be well-equipped for a recession.Bull Case: No Recession, Markets RallyIf you believe the U.S. economy will avoid a recession, you’d think that one should just buy everything at these prices, right? Well, no: it will take time for another broad “buy-all” rally to emerge; investors will be very selective for a while, putting money only on those companies that have established business models and resilient financials.Go with the “base-case” portfolio, adding to it some stocks from sectors that benefit from higher growth, basing your choice on reasonable stock pricing and good fundamentals. Considering adding tech anddiscretionary stocksto the portfolio, such as Sally Beauty (NYSE: SBH), trading at a P/E ratio of 7.5, Century Communities (NYSE: CCS) at 2.8, Green Brick Partners (NYSE: GRBK) at 3.99, Western Digital (NASDAQ: WDC) at 10.5, Stride (NYSE: LRN) at 15.0, Applied Materials (NASDAQ: AMAT) at 12.8, and ON Semiconductor (NASDAQ: ON) at 16.2.The Takeaway: Just Hold OnWhatever happens in 2023, remember: every bear market has ended with a new bull market. Hedge your portfolio to ride out the turbulence, and don’t lose calm.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":57,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9924184122,"gmtCreate":1672198404166,"gmtModify":1676538651114,"author":{"id":"3569303342488537","authorId":"3569303342488537","name":"ColeHii","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":1},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👍","listText":"👍","text":"👍","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":9,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9924184122","repostId":"1147971350","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1147971350","pubTimestamp":1672192174,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1147971350?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-12-28 09:49","market":"us","language":"en","title":"6 Numbers that Defined 2022","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1147971350","media":"The Smart Investor","summary":"As the curtains come down for 2022, there are six key numbers that come to mind.As the curtains come","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>As the curtains come down for 2022, there are six key numbers that come to mind.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/428ad7004ebd7e4c3c838c5f3f4f3675\" tg-width=\"800\" tg-height=\"533\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>As the curtains come down for 2022, it’s time to reflect on the events that have defined the stock market for the year.</p><p>There has been no shortage of uncertainty, ranging from the Ukraine-Russia war to the sky-high inflation and aggressive interest rate hikes, to name a few.</p><p>Amid the multitude of challenges we face as an investor, it’s imperative to put everything into the proper context so that we may learn the right lessons from them and not the wrong ones.</p><p>Here are six numbers that come to mind.</p><p><b>January 2022: Four in 10 NASDAQ stocks halved</b></p><p>The <b>NASDAQ</b> peaked at around 16,200 points in late November 2021 before ending the year down by less than four per cent from its high.</p><p>But under the hood, the cracks had started already appearing for the tech-heavy index.</p><p>In the first week of January, data from Sundial Capital Research showed that approximately four out of every 10 companies on the index were down by over 50 per cent from their 52-week highs.</p><p>Furthermore, the majority of stocks within the NASDAQ were down by 20 per cent or more.</p><p>This level of carnage is only exceeded by major bear markets of the past such as the 2000 dot-com bubble, the 2008 great financial crisis (GFC), and the 2020 pandemic crash.</p><p>Sure enough, the NASDAQ entered a bear market in late February.</p><p>For 2022, the index is poised to close the year at 30 per cent below its peak after posting a gain of over 21 per cent in 2021.</p><p><b>March 2022: A record six months of rate hikes</b></p><p>In March 2022, the US Federal Reserve moved to raise interest rates for the first time since December 2018 to combat runaway inflation.</p><p>The initial rate hike was a relatively tepid 0.25 points.</p><p>However, what followed next was far from normal.</p><p>According to data compiled by the Visual Capitalist, the effective federal funds rate rose past the two percentage mark within six months, its fastest increase in decades.</p><p>To put this into context, the US central bank took as much as 36 months to reach the same rate level in its previous rate hike cycle between December 2015 and December 2018.</p><p>In fact, since 1988, the closest example of such an extreme pace was between February 1994 and February 1995 where it took 12 months for the US Fed to increase rates to 2.67 percentage points; that’s still twice the duration of the latest rate hikes.</p><p>In other words, the current pace of increase is abnormal in recent times.</p><p>As investors, we should be mindful of the differences between the different eras before drawing any conclusions. The best lessons, after all, are learnt over years, not months.</p><p><b>June 2022: The worst six-month stretch at halftime</b></p><p>The pace of the rate increases took a toll on financial markets.</p><p>At the halfway mark of 2022, wealth manager Ben Carlson said that the first six months of 2022 was within 3% of the worst-ever six-month stretch for the <b>S&amp;P 500</b> since 1926.</p><p>Similar to January’s date, there were few other periods where the index’s performance was worse, namely the Great Depression in the 1930s, World War II, the 1970s bear market, the dot-com bust and the 2008 GFC crash.</p><p><b>October 2022: Six per cent of foreign currency turmoil</b></p><p>Notably, the rise in US interest rates has wreaked havoc in exchange rates.</p><p>In October, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) said that the US dollar is at its highest level since 2000.</p><p>The global organisation added that the dollar had appreciated 22 per cent against the Japanese Yen, 13 per cent against the Euro and on average, six per cent against emerging market currencies since the start of the year.</p><p>These sharp changes in currency rates left a mark, especially on US-based companies with international operations.</p><p>For instance, tech giant <b>Microsoft</b> (NASDAQ: MSFT) took a sizable five percentage point topline hit on its latest quarterly results, reducing its revenue growth from 16 per cent year on year (in constant currency terms) to 11 per cent.</p><p>Similarly, healthcare conglomerate <b>Johnson &amp; Johnson</b> (NYSE: JNJ) saw its international sales growth flatline after experiencing a 12.6 per cent currency headwind in its third quarter. Excluding this impact, growth would have a solid 12.3 per cent year on year.</p><p>When it comes to currency, the effect cuts across all industries.</p><p>Everyone suffers the same impact, but the best businesses will still win.</p><p><b>December 2022: Falling below 120 days</b></p><p>As the year winds down, data from financial firm Charles Schwab showed that 2022 had the fewest positive trading days since the 2008 GFC and the 2000 dot-com bust.</p><p>This year, there were less than 120 trading days where stocks from around the world recorded a daily gain.</p><p>Like it or not, as humans, the effect of seeing red ink, day after day and month after month, can have an impact on our investing psyche.</p><p>According to Nobel Prize winner Daniel Kahneman, our minds are designed to recognise danger without needing any prompts from us. And when it comes to investing, this innate ability can send the wrong signals to our brains and cause us to panic sell at the wrong time.</p><p>Given the circumstances, it is in our best interest to keep a level head to survive today’s market crash.</p><p><b>December 2022: 50% are looking for remote work</b></p><p>The final stat is symbolic rather than a defining number.</p><p>Amid this year’s doom and gloom, it’s important to remember that innovation has permanently changed the way we live and work.</p><p>Case in point: LinkedIn CEO Ryan Roslansky recently shared an interesting statistic.</p><p>Prior to the pandemic, the number of remote jobs posted on the platform was a mere 1%.</p><p>Today, this proportion has grown to a stunning 14%, suggesting that there is a massive shift in companies willing to accept remote workers. Tellingly, over half of job applicants on Linkedin are targeting remote work, suggesting that it is becoming a key preference.</p><p>This massive shift is a keen reminder that innovation is happening all the time.</p><p>Many of the common digital tools we are familiar with today gained prominence during the pandemic and are here to stay.</p><p>As investors, this is a good place to end the year on an optimistic note.</p><p>While the world is rife with uncertainty today, the investing principles that have served us well for decades will make a difference when the dark clouds clear and it comes time to grow again.</p><p><b>Note:</b> An earlier version of this article appeared in The Business Times.</p></body></html>","source":"lsy1602567310727","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>6 Numbers that Defined 2022</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n6 Numbers that Defined 2022\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-12-28 09:49 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://thesmartinvestor.com.sg/6-numbers-that-defined-2022/><strong>The Smart Investor</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>As the curtains come down for 2022, there are six key numbers that come to mind.As the curtains come down for 2022, it’s time to reflect on the events that have defined the stock market for the year....</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://thesmartinvestor.com.sg/6-numbers-that-defined-2022/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".DJI":"道琼斯",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index"},"source_url":"https://thesmartinvestor.com.sg/6-numbers-that-defined-2022/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1147971350","content_text":"As the curtains come down for 2022, there are six key numbers that come to mind.As the curtains come down for 2022, it’s time to reflect on the events that have defined the stock market for the year.There has been no shortage of uncertainty, ranging from the Ukraine-Russia war to the sky-high inflation and aggressive interest rate hikes, to name a few.Amid the multitude of challenges we face as an investor, it’s imperative to put everything into the proper context so that we may learn the right lessons from them and not the wrong ones.Here are six numbers that come to mind.January 2022: Four in 10 NASDAQ stocks halvedThe NASDAQ peaked at around 16,200 points in late November 2021 before ending the year down by less than four per cent from its high.But under the hood, the cracks had started already appearing for the tech-heavy index.In the first week of January, data from Sundial Capital Research showed that approximately four out of every 10 companies on the index were down by over 50 per cent from their 52-week highs.Furthermore, the majority of stocks within the NASDAQ were down by 20 per cent or more.This level of carnage is only exceeded by major bear markets of the past such as the 2000 dot-com bubble, the 2008 great financial crisis (GFC), and the 2020 pandemic crash.Sure enough, the NASDAQ entered a bear market in late February.For 2022, the index is poised to close the year at 30 per cent below its peak after posting a gain of over 21 per cent in 2021.March 2022: A record six months of rate hikesIn March 2022, the US Federal Reserve moved to raise interest rates for the first time since December 2018 to combat runaway inflation.The initial rate hike was a relatively tepid 0.25 points.However, what followed next was far from normal.According to data compiled by the Visual Capitalist, the effective federal funds rate rose past the two percentage mark within six months, its fastest increase in decades.To put this into context, the US central bank took as much as 36 months to reach the same rate level in its previous rate hike cycle between December 2015 and December 2018.In fact, since 1988, the closest example of such an extreme pace was between February 1994 and February 1995 where it took 12 months for the US Fed to increase rates to 2.67 percentage points; that’s still twice the duration of the latest rate hikes.In other words, the current pace of increase is abnormal in recent times.As investors, we should be mindful of the differences between the different eras before drawing any conclusions. The best lessons, after all, are learnt over years, not months.June 2022: The worst six-month stretch at halftimeThe pace of the rate increases took a toll on financial markets.At the halfway mark of 2022, wealth manager Ben Carlson said that the first six months of 2022 was within 3% of the worst-ever six-month stretch for the S&P 500 since 1926.Similar to January’s date, there were few other periods where the index’s performance was worse, namely the Great Depression in the 1930s, World War II, the 1970s bear market, the dot-com bust and the 2008 GFC crash.October 2022: Six per cent of foreign currency turmoilNotably, the rise in US interest rates has wreaked havoc in exchange rates.In October, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) said that the US dollar is at its highest level since 2000.The global organisation added that the dollar had appreciated 22 per cent against the Japanese Yen, 13 per cent against the Euro and on average, six per cent against emerging market currencies since the start of the year.These sharp changes in currency rates left a mark, especially on US-based companies with international operations.For instance, tech giant Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT) took a sizable five percentage point topline hit on its latest quarterly results, reducing its revenue growth from 16 per cent year on year (in constant currency terms) to 11 per cent.Similarly, healthcare conglomerate Johnson & Johnson (NYSE: JNJ) saw its international sales growth flatline after experiencing a 12.6 per cent currency headwind in its third quarter. Excluding this impact, growth would have a solid 12.3 per cent year on year.When it comes to currency, the effect cuts across all industries.Everyone suffers the same impact, but the best businesses will still win.December 2022: Falling below 120 daysAs the year winds down, data from financial firm Charles Schwab showed that 2022 had the fewest positive trading days since the 2008 GFC and the 2000 dot-com bust.This year, there were less than 120 trading days where stocks from around the world recorded a daily gain.Like it or not, as humans, the effect of seeing red ink, day after day and month after month, can have an impact on our investing psyche.According to Nobel Prize winner Daniel Kahneman, our minds are designed to recognise danger without needing any prompts from us. And when it comes to investing, this innate ability can send the wrong signals to our brains and cause us to panic sell at the wrong time.Given the circumstances, it is in our best interest to keep a level head to survive today’s market crash.December 2022: 50% are looking for remote workThe final stat is symbolic rather than a defining number.Amid this year’s doom and gloom, it’s important to remember that innovation has permanently changed the way we live and work.Case in point: LinkedIn CEO Ryan Roslansky recently shared an interesting statistic.Prior to the pandemic, the number of remote jobs posted on the platform was a mere 1%.Today, this proportion has grown to a stunning 14%, suggesting that there is a massive shift in companies willing to accept remote workers. Tellingly, over half of job applicants on Linkedin are targeting remote work, suggesting that it is becoming a key preference.This massive shift is a keen reminder that innovation is happening all the time.Many of the common digital tools we are familiar with today gained prominence during the pandemic and are here to stay.As investors, this is a good place to end the year on an optimistic note.While the world is rife with uncertainty today, the investing principles that have served us well for decades will make a difference when the dark clouds clear and it comes time to grow again.Note: An earlier version of this article appeared in The Business Times.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":12,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9924008962,"gmtCreate":1672125567857,"gmtModify":1676538638063,"author":{"id":"3569303342488537","authorId":"3569303342488537","name":"ColeHii","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":1},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👍","listText":"👍","text":"👍","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":8,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9924008962","repostId":"1107087281","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1107087281","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Stock Market Quotes, Business News, Financial News, Trading Ideas, and Stock Research by Professionals","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Benzinga","id":"1052270027","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa"},"pubTimestamp":1672110341,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1107087281?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-12-27 11:05","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Down 25%, Meta 65%, Amazon 49% As Tech Stocks Hit Rough Patch In 2022: 4 Factors That Could Work In Sector's Favor In 2023","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1107087281","media":"Benzinga","summary":"ZINGER KEY POINTSTech stocks have led 2022's market sell-off and have underperformed the broader mar","content":"<html><head></head><body><h2>ZINGER KEY POINTS</h2><ul><li>Tech stocks have led 2022&#39;s market sell-off and have underperformed the broader market.</li><li>Big techs alone have lost $2.5 trillion in market value, according to JPMorgan.</li></ul><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ac0434da7b30b89f97d71c6d77ee2c0c\" tg-width=\"941\" tg-height=\"514\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>Tech stocks just had their annus horribilis. The sell-off in the space was so indiscriminate that most shed billions or millions from their market capitalizations.</p><p>The tech-heavy <b>Nasdaq Composite Index</b> has lost almost twice as much as the broader <b>S&amp;P 500 Index</b>, underlining the skewed nature of the market sell-off toward the tech space.</p><p><b>Falling Off The Cliff:</b> The economy did have a part in the tech meltdown, but it alone cannot be squarely blamed. Tech stocks were on an extended run between 2016 and 2021, pushing valuations of many equities to unsustainable levels, Christopher Baggini,global head of equity strategy of JPMorgan Asset &amp; Wealth Management, said in a note.</p><p>These valuations, according to the analyst, could not be sustained in a higher interest rate environment. The situation got worse with the “complicated dynamics of slowing economic growth, uneven demand, inventory management and gradually improving supply chains,” he said.</p><p>For taking stock of the ravages, we don’t have to look past the big techs, which now look like a pale shadow of their old selves.</p><p>The FAANG stocks, save <b>Apple Inc.</b> are down by much more than the Nasdaq Composite as well as the <b>Nasdaq 100 Index</b>. <b>Meta Platforms Inc.</b> has the worst loss for the year so far in this category, followed by <b>Netflix Inc.</b> and <b>Amazon Inc.</b>.</p><p>Apple also has had its fair share of problems, especially with the concentration of its production base in China hurting output and shipments.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/74ff3bc30c2cd00e27908b0a1d5f3939\" tg-width=\"2880\" tg-height=\"1523\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>Source: Proprietary chart</span></p><p>It was against this backdrop that these companies began shifting their focus on operational discipline in a bid to preserve margins. The result: thousands of employees taken off payrolls, cost cuts, projects shelved and unprofitable divisions shut down.</p><p>Meta for one announced massive layoffs numbering 11,000 in November. When <b>Elon Musk</b> took <b>Twitter</b> private, he planned a three-quarter reduction in payrolls.</p><p><b>Future Is Tense:</b> Despite the extremely attractive valuations, not many analysts agree that a reversal is around the corner. Macroeconomic headwinds could prove to be a pushback for the sector, as circumspect consumers abstain from huge purchases.</p><p>The <b>Federal Reserve</b> under <b>Jerome Powell</b> has signaled that rate hikes could continue well into 2023, albeit at a slower pace. This has a direct bearing on consumer spending. Inflationary pressure, though abating, still runs high, leaving consumers with less real income to splurge on consumer discretionary items.</p><p>Tech supply chains still remain constrained amid adverse geopolitical challenges. Chinais being hit by one COVID-19wave after another, leading to production disruptions at big U.S. tech companies such as Apple, which are heavily reliant on the country.</p><p>To make matters worse, competitive pressure is intensifying, hurting revenues. A case in point is <b>TikTok</b>, which has been blamed for part of the weaknesses at most other communication tech companies.</p><p>Even amid all these dark clouds, there are a few silver linings.</p><h2>4 Themes Supportive Of Tech Stocks:</h2><p><b>1. Potential Easing Of Dollar Strength:</b> Most technology companies, especially big techs, conduct businesses globally and derive a substantial portion of their revenue in local currencies. As the dollar continued to rise against other major currencies amid the Fed’s aggressive tightening, it shaved some percentage points off topline growth.</p><p>Forex volatility is a headwind for big techs, which have 35%-40% revenue exposure to Europe, and a stronger dollar is a 400-basis-point top-line headwind, Wedbushanalyst Daniel Ivessaid, Axios reported.</p><p>With the Fed expected to slow down the pace of rate hikes or even pause in the new year, analysts see the greenback weakening in 2023. This should remove one of the overhangs around the tech space.</p><p><b>2. M&amp;A, Consolidation:</b> Valuations of tech companies are below the past five-year averages, Ives said in a recent note.</p><p>This, the analyst said, could lead to a spate of M&amp;A transactions in the space in 2023. The M&amp;A wave has already begun. Tech-focused privateequity firm <b>Thoma Bravo</b> announced earlier this month a deal to buy <b>Coupa Software Inc.</b></p><p><b>3. Lean, Mean Structures:</b> Industry veterans and analysts blame much of the current predicament on the excesses of tech companies, which bloated their cost structures.</p><p>From irrational exuberance, companies are now coming to terms with the stark reality, and this has forced them to announce massive layoffs and rethink priorities. Most have begun focusing on a smaller number of high-priority growth areas, JPMorgan analysts said in a recent commentary.</p><p>The analysts pointed to Amazon’s flexibility in pushing first-party versus third-party inventory and its Prime offering, Alphabet’s focus on diversifying its revenue streams by developing its non-ad business and Meta leaning toward its AI discovery engine, ad and business platforms as well as its multiyear transition to the metaverse.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4579314d1fa6c2ef480282ed83b16d48\" tg-width=\"5760\" tg-height=\"3014\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>Source: JPMorgan</span></p><p>“Overall, key opportunities for Big Tech in 2023 include rightsizing cost structures through headcount reduction and greater operating discipline, increasing focus on profits and cash flow, leaning responsibly into new growth drivers and gaining market share during this tough macro period,” JPMorgan’s tech analyst Doug Anmuthsaid.</p><p><b>4. Supportive Valuations:</b> Big techs alone have lost a combined market cap of $2.5 trillion in 2022, JPMorgan estimates.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1f9cf7097880df3a75e83d71184780cd\" tg-width=\"5760\" tg-height=\"3288\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>Source: TradingView</span></p><p>The oversold levels typically suggest a rebound may be around the corner. This time around, the upcoming year is fraught with risks.</p><p>Consumer tech companies could face the brunt of negativity as COVID-19 tailwinds abate, energy prices rise in Europe and global economic activity slows, Franklin Templeton said in its 2023 technology sector outlook. Valuations are nearing the point, where they have begun to reflect expectations of below-trend growth continuing into 2023, the firm said.</p><p><b>Price Action:</b> The <b>Invesco QQQ </b> ended Friday&#39;s session up 0.22%, at $267.36, according toBenzinga Pro data.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Down 25%, Meta 65%, Amazon 49% As Tech Stocks Hit Rough Patch In 2022: 4 Factors That Could Work In Sector's Favor In 2023</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Down 25%, Meta 65%, Amazon 49% As Tech Stocks Hit Rough Patch In 2022: 4 Factors That Could Work In Sector's Favor In 2023\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Benzinga </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-12-27 11:05</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><h2>ZINGER KEY POINTS</h2><ul><li>Tech stocks have led 2022&#39;s market sell-off and have underperformed the broader market.</li><li>Big techs alone have lost $2.5 trillion in market value, according to JPMorgan.</li></ul><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ac0434da7b30b89f97d71c6d77ee2c0c\" tg-width=\"941\" tg-height=\"514\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>Tech stocks just had their annus horribilis. The sell-off in the space was so indiscriminate that most shed billions or millions from their market capitalizations.</p><p>The tech-heavy <b>Nasdaq Composite Index</b> has lost almost twice as much as the broader <b>S&amp;P 500 Index</b>, underlining the skewed nature of the market sell-off toward the tech space.</p><p><b>Falling Off The Cliff:</b> The economy did have a part in the tech meltdown, but it alone cannot be squarely blamed. Tech stocks were on an extended run between 2016 and 2021, pushing valuations of many equities to unsustainable levels, Christopher Baggini,global head of equity strategy of JPMorgan Asset &amp; Wealth Management, said in a note.</p><p>These valuations, according to the analyst, could not be sustained in a higher interest rate environment. The situation got worse with the “complicated dynamics of slowing economic growth, uneven demand, inventory management and gradually improving supply chains,” he said.</p><p>For taking stock of the ravages, we don’t have to look past the big techs, which now look like a pale shadow of their old selves.</p><p>The FAANG stocks, save <b>Apple Inc.</b> are down by much more than the Nasdaq Composite as well as the <b>Nasdaq 100 Index</b>. <b>Meta Platforms Inc.</b> has the worst loss for the year so far in this category, followed by <b>Netflix Inc.</b> and <b>Amazon Inc.</b>.</p><p>Apple also has had its fair share of problems, especially with the concentration of its production base in China hurting output and shipments.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/74ff3bc30c2cd00e27908b0a1d5f3939\" tg-width=\"2880\" tg-height=\"1523\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>Source: Proprietary chart</span></p><p>It was against this backdrop that these companies began shifting their focus on operational discipline in a bid to preserve margins. The result: thousands of employees taken off payrolls, cost cuts, projects shelved and unprofitable divisions shut down.</p><p>Meta for one announced massive layoffs numbering 11,000 in November. When <b>Elon Musk</b> took <b>Twitter</b> private, he planned a three-quarter reduction in payrolls.</p><p><b>Future Is Tense:</b> Despite the extremely attractive valuations, not many analysts agree that a reversal is around the corner. Macroeconomic headwinds could prove to be a pushback for the sector, as circumspect consumers abstain from huge purchases.</p><p>The <b>Federal Reserve</b> under <b>Jerome Powell</b> has signaled that rate hikes could continue well into 2023, albeit at a slower pace. This has a direct bearing on consumer spending. Inflationary pressure, though abating, still runs high, leaving consumers with less real income to splurge on consumer discretionary items.</p><p>Tech supply chains still remain constrained amid adverse geopolitical challenges. Chinais being hit by one COVID-19wave after another, leading to production disruptions at big U.S. tech companies such as Apple, which are heavily reliant on the country.</p><p>To make matters worse, competitive pressure is intensifying, hurting revenues. A case in point is <b>TikTok</b>, which has been blamed for part of the weaknesses at most other communication tech companies.</p><p>Even amid all these dark clouds, there are a few silver linings.</p><h2>4 Themes Supportive Of Tech Stocks:</h2><p><b>1. Potential Easing Of Dollar Strength:</b> Most technology companies, especially big techs, conduct businesses globally and derive a substantial portion of their revenue in local currencies. As the dollar continued to rise against other major currencies amid the Fed’s aggressive tightening, it shaved some percentage points off topline growth.</p><p>Forex volatility is a headwind for big techs, which have 35%-40% revenue exposure to Europe, and a stronger dollar is a 400-basis-point top-line headwind, Wedbushanalyst Daniel Ivessaid, Axios reported.</p><p>With the Fed expected to slow down the pace of rate hikes or even pause in the new year, analysts see the greenback weakening in 2023. This should remove one of the overhangs around the tech space.</p><p><b>2. M&amp;A, Consolidation:</b> Valuations of tech companies are below the past five-year averages, Ives said in a recent note.</p><p>This, the analyst said, could lead to a spate of M&amp;A transactions in the space in 2023. The M&amp;A wave has already begun. Tech-focused privateequity firm <b>Thoma Bravo</b> announced earlier this month a deal to buy <b>Coupa Software Inc.</b></p><p><b>3. Lean, Mean Structures:</b> Industry veterans and analysts blame much of the current predicament on the excesses of tech companies, which bloated their cost structures.</p><p>From irrational exuberance, companies are now coming to terms with the stark reality, and this has forced them to announce massive layoffs and rethink priorities. Most have begun focusing on a smaller number of high-priority growth areas, JPMorgan analysts said in a recent commentary.</p><p>The analysts pointed to Amazon’s flexibility in pushing first-party versus third-party inventory and its Prime offering, Alphabet’s focus on diversifying its revenue streams by developing its non-ad business and Meta leaning toward its AI discovery engine, ad and business platforms as well as its multiyear transition to the metaverse.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4579314d1fa6c2ef480282ed83b16d48\" tg-width=\"5760\" tg-height=\"3014\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>Source: JPMorgan</span></p><p>“Overall, key opportunities for Big Tech in 2023 include rightsizing cost structures through headcount reduction and greater operating discipline, increasing focus on profits and cash flow, leaning responsibly into new growth drivers and gaining market share during this tough macro period,” JPMorgan’s tech analyst Doug Anmuthsaid.</p><p><b>4. Supportive Valuations:</b> Big techs alone have lost a combined market cap of $2.5 trillion in 2022, JPMorgan estimates.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1f9cf7097880df3a75e83d71184780cd\" tg-width=\"5760\" tg-height=\"3288\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>Source: TradingView</span></p><p>The oversold levels typically suggest a rebound may be around the corner. This time around, the upcoming year is fraught with risks.</p><p>Consumer tech companies could face the brunt of negativity as COVID-19 tailwinds abate, energy prices rise in Europe and global economic activity slows, Franklin Templeton said in its 2023 technology sector outlook. Valuations are nearing the point, where they have begun to reflect expectations of below-trend growth continuing into 2023, the firm said.</p><p><b>Price Action:</b> The <b>Invesco QQQ </b> ended Friday&#39;s session up 0.22%, at $267.36, according toBenzinga Pro data.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AMZN":"亚马逊","META":"Meta Platforms","GOOGL":"谷歌A","MSFT":"微软","AAPL":"苹果","GOOG":"谷歌","NFLX":"奈飞"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1107087281","content_text":"ZINGER KEY POINTSTech stocks have led 2022's market sell-off and have underperformed the broader market.Big techs alone have lost $2.5 trillion in market value, according to JPMorgan.Tech stocks just had their annus horribilis. The sell-off in the space was so indiscriminate that most shed billions or millions from their market capitalizations.The tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite Index has lost almost twice as much as the broader S&P 500 Index, underlining the skewed nature of the market sell-off toward the tech space.Falling Off The Cliff: The economy did have a part in the tech meltdown, but it alone cannot be squarely blamed. Tech stocks were on an extended run between 2016 and 2021, pushing valuations of many equities to unsustainable levels, Christopher Baggini,global head of equity strategy of JPMorgan Asset & Wealth Management, said in a note.These valuations, according to the analyst, could not be sustained in a higher interest rate environment. The situation got worse with the “complicated dynamics of slowing economic growth, uneven demand, inventory management and gradually improving supply chains,” he said.For taking stock of the ravages, we don’t have to look past the big techs, which now look like a pale shadow of their old selves.The FAANG stocks, save Apple Inc. are down by much more than the Nasdaq Composite as well as the Nasdaq 100 Index. Meta Platforms Inc. has the worst loss for the year so far in this category, followed by Netflix Inc. and Amazon Inc..Apple also has had its fair share of problems, especially with the concentration of its production base in China hurting output and shipments.Source: Proprietary chartIt was against this backdrop that these companies began shifting their focus on operational discipline in a bid to preserve margins. The result: thousands of employees taken off payrolls, cost cuts, projects shelved and unprofitable divisions shut down.Meta for one announced massive layoffs numbering 11,000 in November. When Elon Musk took Twitter private, he planned a three-quarter reduction in payrolls.Future Is Tense: Despite the extremely attractive valuations, not many analysts agree that a reversal is around the corner. Macroeconomic headwinds could prove to be a pushback for the sector, as circumspect consumers abstain from huge purchases.The Federal Reserve under Jerome Powell has signaled that rate hikes could continue well into 2023, albeit at a slower pace. This has a direct bearing on consumer spending. Inflationary pressure, though abating, still runs high, leaving consumers with less real income to splurge on consumer discretionary items.Tech supply chains still remain constrained amid adverse geopolitical challenges. Chinais being hit by one COVID-19wave after another, leading to production disruptions at big U.S. tech companies such as Apple, which are heavily reliant on the country.To make matters worse, competitive pressure is intensifying, hurting revenues. A case in point is TikTok, which has been blamed for part of the weaknesses at most other communication tech companies.Even amid all these dark clouds, there are a few silver linings.4 Themes Supportive Of Tech Stocks:1. Potential Easing Of Dollar Strength: Most technology companies, especially big techs, conduct businesses globally and derive a substantial portion of their revenue in local currencies. As the dollar continued to rise against other major currencies amid the Fed’s aggressive tightening, it shaved some percentage points off topline growth.Forex volatility is a headwind for big techs, which have 35%-40% revenue exposure to Europe, and a stronger dollar is a 400-basis-point top-line headwind, Wedbushanalyst Daniel Ivessaid, Axios reported.With the Fed expected to slow down the pace of rate hikes or even pause in the new year, analysts see the greenback weakening in 2023. This should remove one of the overhangs around the tech space.2. M&A, Consolidation: Valuations of tech companies are below the past five-year averages, Ives said in a recent note.This, the analyst said, could lead to a spate of M&A transactions in the space in 2023. The M&A wave has already begun. Tech-focused privateequity firm Thoma Bravo announced earlier this month a deal to buy Coupa Software Inc.3. Lean, Mean Structures: Industry veterans and analysts blame much of the current predicament on the excesses of tech companies, which bloated their cost structures.From irrational exuberance, companies are now coming to terms with the stark reality, and this has forced them to announce massive layoffs and rethink priorities. Most have begun focusing on a smaller number of high-priority growth areas, JPMorgan analysts said in a recent commentary.The analysts pointed to Amazon’s flexibility in pushing first-party versus third-party inventory and its Prime offering, Alphabet’s focus on diversifying its revenue streams by developing its non-ad business and Meta leaning toward its AI discovery engine, ad and business platforms as well as its multiyear transition to the metaverse.Source: JPMorgan“Overall, key opportunities for Big Tech in 2023 include rightsizing cost structures through headcount reduction and greater operating discipline, increasing focus on profits and cash flow, leaning responsibly into new growth drivers and gaining market share during this tough macro period,” JPMorgan’s tech analyst Doug Anmuthsaid.4. Supportive Valuations: Big techs alone have lost a combined market cap of $2.5 trillion in 2022, JPMorgan estimates.Source: TradingViewThe oversold levels typically suggest a rebound may be around the corner. This time around, the upcoming year is fraught with risks.Consumer tech companies could face the brunt of negativity as COVID-19 tailwinds abate, energy prices rise in Europe and global economic activity slows, Franklin Templeton said in its 2023 technology sector outlook. Valuations are nearing the point, where they have begun to reflect expectations of below-trend growth continuing into 2023, the firm said.Price Action: The Invesco QQQ  ended Friday's session up 0.22%, at $267.36, according toBenzinga Pro data.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":39,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9925528518,"gmtCreate":1672069921835,"gmtModify":1676538629735,"author":{"id":"3569303342488537","authorId":"3569303342488537","name":"ColeHii","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":1},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👍","listText":"👍","text":"👍","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":8,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9925528518","repostId":"1152955091","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1152955091","pubTimestamp":1672068846,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1152955091?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-12-26 23:34","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Tesla's Crash Could Signal A New Bull Market","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1152955091","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"As the market transitions to more sensible valuations, there are less and less reasons to be bearish","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>As the market transitions to more sensible valuations, there are less and less reasons to be bearish. The beginning of a recession often signals the beginning of a new bull market. I&#39;m still not bullish on Tesla, nor the S&amp;P 500. But I wouldn&#39;t be short, and I wouldn&#39;t be sitting on a pile of cash at a time like this. Jim Cramer often exclaims on CNBC, &#34;There&#39;s always a bull market somewhere.&#34; This is by no means an endorsement to take advice from Jim Cramer, but I believe there are plenty of contrarian values to be bullish about as the market shifts from what was to what will be.</p><p>As for Tesla, I&#39;m not a buyer yet. In my base-case scenario, I&#39;m seeing long-term returns of 5% per annum.</p><h3>Tesla&#39;s Outlook</h3><p>Legendary investor Sir John Templeton once told Bill Miller the following:</p><p>&#34;There are only two types of investors, those who are outlook and trend investors and those who are price and value investors. 90% of people are outlook and trend investors.&#34;</p><p>A year ago, the outlook for Tesla was phenomenal. The company was demonstrating explosive growth, and that growth was expected to continue. So far, it has. Tesla&#39;s net income has soared:</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fba100e8982cd53633e2922445131c56\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"417\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/>Despite this terrific financial performance, Tesla&#39;s stock has plummeted. So, what&#39;s going on here? Well, like Sir John Templeton said, 90% of investors are &#34;outlook and trend investors.&#34; What happened was, the outlook changed. Elon&#39;s diverting his attention to Twitter, a recession looms, and Tesla&#39;s market share is shrinking. These are all things I warned about five months ago. They&#39;re coming to light.</p><p>As for the market share, Forbes said it best:</p><p>&#34;Tesla continues to dominate EV sales, with 65.4% of the EV market. However, that is down from 68.2% in 2021 and 79.4% in 2020. With the market growing, Tesla is still rapidly growing its vehicle sales despite its loss of market share.&#34;</p><p>That&#39;s U.S. market share, by the way. Globally, Tesla has an EV market share of roughly 14%.</p><p>Another issue for Tesla is that every automaker globally now wants in on EVs. And of course they do, EV stocks have soared and traditional automaker&#39;s stocks haven&#39;t. In addition, Tesla&#39;s displayed remarkable profitability selling EVs. This is simply how capitalism works; when an industry gets hot, everyone rushes in. Once everyone&#39;s rushed in, the profits get squeezed because there&#39;s more competition.</p><p>Now, looking at Tesla. The company maintains the premium product. Tesla&#39;s customer satisfaction scores are industry leading. Tesla had a first-mover advantage, and its technology is just better at this point. Elon did a terrific job of building Tesla&#39;s brand in a brutally competitive auto market.</p><p>One thing to note on the customer satisfaction scores: that&#39;s just for EVs. Newsweek recently found that buyers of internal-combustion vehicles are more satisfied than EV buyers:</p><h3><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0fbc8c1f4dbd2317e3869d3baa82c71d\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"146\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/>Tesla&#39;s Future Growth</h3><p>The number of electric vehicles sold globally is projected to grow at 17% per annum through to 2027. Tesla has an opportunity to grow its autonomous drive, EV semis, and energy generation businesses at rates exceeding 17%. But, because 95% of Tesla&#39;s revenue comes from the automotive arm, where Tesla is losing share, I expect the company to grow its earnings at a slower pace.</p><p>The other issue I&#39;m seeing is the cyclicality of the auto market. Nearing the peak of the cycle, Tesla&#39;s never before been this profitable:</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0e3b58724f2aa85e9e67975a8a420129\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"433\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/>These kinds of profit margins and return on assets numbers are far beyond industry averages and will be difficult to maintain over the next 10 years as competitors catch up on a technological basis.</p><p>All things considered, I&#39;m projecting earnings to grow at a pace of 15% per annum from here.</p><h3>Long-term Returns</h3><p>My 2033 price target for Tesla is $208 per share, implying a return of 5% per annum.</p><p>Tesla has earnings per share of $3.23. If it can grow that at 15% per annum, it will earn $13 per share in 2033. I&#39;ve applied a terminal multiple of 16x.</p><p>Does Tesla&#39;s Collapse Signal A New Bull Market?</p><p>A recession in 2023 is now baked into the consensus. Globally, the world is already beginning to experience rolling recessions. At the same time, investors are exceptionally pessimistic:</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3e666c6a5e6b8a46f7ae6082479758c6\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"239\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/>This usually means it&#39;s time to be contrarian and go long. All of the billions of dollars that have flowed out of Tesla stock have to go somewhere after all.</p><p>I explained in my article &#34;QQQ: An Excessive Bust Is Coming&#34; why I expect the pessimism in the technology sector to be more prolonged. The reason: George Soros has explained in the past that excessive margin, speculation, and exuberance on the upside creates excessive insolvency, fear, and selling on the downside. After the dot com bubble burst, it took 15 years for tech stocks to gain popularity again. Fifteen years is often the amount of time it takes for investors to forget about the pain inflicted when a bubble pops. After a fifteen-year stretch, earnings tend to catch up to valuations, and industries have time to fully consolidate.</p><p>Rather than looking at stocks that have &#34;gone to the moon,&#34; I&#39;m finding opportunities in stocks that have gone nowhere for 15 years. This was the case for Microsoft (MSFT) in 2013:</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e0b1d1bc530a801074c58a4c41b77c74\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"417\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/>I believe flat indexes and stocks are now great hunting grounds for the next bull market. The key is that the fundamentals are in good shape (You don&#39;t want to buy a company that&#39;s about to go bankrupt or become obsolete). As for the market as a whole, I&#39;m seeing returns in the range of 5% per annum for the Vanguard S&amp;P 500 ETF (VOO) and Spider S&amp;P 500 Trust ETF (SPY).</p><h3>In Conclusion</h3><p>I&#39;ve upgraded Tesla to a &#34;sell&#34; from a &#34;strong-sell.&#34; Following its collapse, Tesla may be offering a market matching return of 5% per annum. A 5% annual return is right between a &#34;sell&#34; and &#34;hold&#34; rating for me. But, because of the opportunity cost and George Soros&#39; boom-bust model, I think it&#39;s best to sell and move on. After tech stocks toppled in 2000, value stocks really took off. As Jim Cramer often exclaims, &#34;There&#39;s always a bull market somewhere.&#34; Until next time, happy investing.</p></body></html>","source":"seekingalpha_fund","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Tesla's Crash Could Signal A New Bull Market</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTesla's Crash Could Signal A New Bull Market\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-12-26 23:34 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4566265-teslas-crash-could-signal-a-new-bull-market><strong>Seeking Alpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>As the market transitions to more sensible valuations, there are less and less reasons to be bearish. The beginning of a recession often signals the beginning of a new bull market. I'm still not ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4566265-teslas-crash-could-signal-a-new-bull-market\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4566265-teslas-crash-could-signal-a-new-bull-market","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1152955091","content_text":"As the market transitions to more sensible valuations, there are less and less reasons to be bearish. The beginning of a recession often signals the beginning of a new bull market. I'm still not bullish on Tesla, nor the S&P 500. But I wouldn't be short, and I wouldn't be sitting on a pile of cash at a time like this. Jim Cramer often exclaims on CNBC, \"There's always a bull market somewhere.\" This is by no means an endorsement to take advice from Jim Cramer, but I believe there are plenty of contrarian values to be bullish about as the market shifts from what was to what will be.As for Tesla, I'm not a buyer yet. In my base-case scenario, I'm seeing long-term returns of 5% per annum.Tesla's OutlookLegendary investor Sir John Templeton once told Bill Miller the following:\"There are only two types of investors, those who are outlook and trend investors and those who are price and value investors. 90% of people are outlook and trend investors.\"A year ago, the outlook for Tesla was phenomenal. The company was demonstrating explosive growth, and that growth was expected to continue. So far, it has. Tesla's net income has soared:Despite this terrific financial performance, Tesla's stock has plummeted. So, what's going on here? Well, like Sir John Templeton said, 90% of investors are \"outlook and trend investors.\" What happened was, the outlook changed. Elon's diverting his attention to Twitter, a recession looms, and Tesla's market share is shrinking. These are all things I warned about five months ago. They're coming to light.As for the market share, Forbes said it best:\"Tesla continues to dominate EV sales, with 65.4% of the EV market. However, that is down from 68.2% in 2021 and 79.4% in 2020. With the market growing, Tesla is still rapidly growing its vehicle sales despite its loss of market share.\"That's U.S. market share, by the way. Globally, Tesla has an EV market share of roughly 14%.Another issue for Tesla is that every automaker globally now wants in on EVs. And of course they do, EV stocks have soared and traditional automaker's stocks haven't. In addition, Tesla's displayed remarkable profitability selling EVs. This is simply how capitalism works; when an industry gets hot, everyone rushes in. Once everyone's rushed in, the profits get squeezed because there's more competition.Now, looking at Tesla. The company maintains the premium product. Tesla's customer satisfaction scores are industry leading. Tesla had a first-mover advantage, and its technology is just better at this point. Elon did a terrific job of building Tesla's brand in a brutally competitive auto market.One thing to note on the customer satisfaction scores: that's just for EVs. Newsweek recently found that buyers of internal-combustion vehicles are more satisfied than EV buyers:Tesla's Future GrowthThe number of electric vehicles sold globally is projected to grow at 17% per annum through to 2027. Tesla has an opportunity to grow its autonomous drive, EV semis, and energy generation businesses at rates exceeding 17%. But, because 95% of Tesla's revenue comes from the automotive arm, where Tesla is losing share, I expect the company to grow its earnings at a slower pace.The other issue I'm seeing is the cyclicality of the auto market. Nearing the peak of the cycle, Tesla's never before been this profitable:These kinds of profit margins and return on assets numbers are far beyond industry averages and will be difficult to maintain over the next 10 years as competitors catch up on a technological basis.All things considered, I'm projecting earnings to grow at a pace of 15% per annum from here.Long-term ReturnsMy 2033 price target for Tesla is $208 per share, implying a return of 5% per annum.Tesla has earnings per share of $3.23. If it can grow that at 15% per annum, it will earn $13 per share in 2033. I've applied a terminal multiple of 16x.Does Tesla's Collapse Signal A New Bull Market?A recession in 2023 is now baked into the consensus. Globally, the world is already beginning to experience rolling recessions. At the same time, investors are exceptionally pessimistic:This usually means it's time to be contrarian and go long. All of the billions of dollars that have flowed out of Tesla stock have to go somewhere after all.I explained in my article \"QQQ: An Excessive Bust Is Coming\" why I expect the pessimism in the technology sector to be more prolonged. The reason: George Soros has explained in the past that excessive margin, speculation, and exuberance on the upside creates excessive insolvency, fear, and selling on the downside. After the dot com bubble burst, it took 15 years for tech stocks to gain popularity again. Fifteen years is often the amount of time it takes for investors to forget about the pain inflicted when a bubble pops. After a fifteen-year stretch, earnings tend to catch up to valuations, and industries have time to fully consolidate.Rather than looking at stocks that have \"gone to the moon,\" I'm finding opportunities in stocks that have gone nowhere for 15 years. This was the case for Microsoft (MSFT) in 2013:I believe flat indexes and stocks are now great hunting grounds for the next bull market. The key is that the fundamentals are in good shape (You don't want to buy a company that's about to go bankrupt or become obsolete). As for the market as a whole, I'm seeing returns in the range of 5% per annum for the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and Spider S&P 500 Trust ETF (SPY).In ConclusionI've upgraded Tesla to a \"sell\" from a \"strong-sell.\" Following its collapse, Tesla may be offering a market matching return of 5% per annum. A 5% annual return is right between a \"sell\" and \"hold\" rating for me. But, because of the opportunity cost and George Soros' boom-bust model, I think it's best to sell and move on. After tech stocks toppled in 2000, value stocks really took off. As Jim Cramer often exclaims, \"There's always a bull market somewhere.\" Until next time, happy investing.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":41,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9925836211,"gmtCreate":1671982446034,"gmtModify":1676538617781,"author":{"id":"3569303342488537","authorId":"3569303342488537","name":"ColeHii","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":1},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👍","listText":"👍","text":"👍","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":10,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9925836211","repostId":"1192326933","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1192326933","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1672011741,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1192326933?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-12-26 07:42","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Reminder: U.S. Market Will be Closed for Christmas Day on Monday, 26 December 2022","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1192326933","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"U.S. ChristmasDay hasarrived. The U.S. market will be closed on Monday, 26 December 2022. Please take note of the trading arrangements during the holiday period and make the necessary preparations in ","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f9c0d643f9647f8bf16257138dcbed8a\" tg-width=\"1200\" tg-height=\"602\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>U.S. Christmas Day has arrived. The U.S. market will be closed on Monday, 26 December 2022. Please take note of the trading arrangements during the holiday period and make the necessary preparations in advance.</p><p>The Singapore market will be closed at local time on Monday, 26 December 2022.</p><p>The Hong Kong market will be closed at local time on Monday, 26 December 2022 and Tuesday, 27 December 2022.</p><p>The Australian market will be closed at local time on Monday, 26 December 2022 and Tuesday, 27 December 2022 in addition to the Boxing Day.</p><p>The New Zealand market will be closed at local time on Monday, 26 December 2022 and Tuesday, 27 December 2022 in addition to the Boxing Day.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Reminder: U.S. Market Will be Closed for Christmas Day on Monday, 26 December 2022</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nReminder: U.S. Market Will be Closed for Christmas Day on Monday, 26 December 2022\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-12-26 07:42</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f9c0d643f9647f8bf16257138dcbed8a\" tg-width=\"1200\" tg-height=\"602\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>U.S. Christmas Day has arrived. The U.S. market will be closed on Monday, 26 December 2022. Please take note of the trading arrangements during the holiday period and make the necessary preparations in advance.</p><p>The Singapore market will be closed at local time on Monday, 26 December 2022.</p><p>The Hong Kong market will be closed at local time on Monday, 26 December 2022 and Tuesday, 27 December 2022.</p><p>The Australian market will be closed at local time on Monday, 26 December 2022 and Tuesday, 27 December 2022 in addition to the Boxing Day.</p><p>The New Zealand market will be closed at local time on Monday, 26 December 2022 and Tuesday, 27 December 2022 in addition to the Boxing Day.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1192326933","content_text":"U.S. Christmas Day has arrived. The U.S. market will be closed on Monday, 26 December 2022. Please take note of the trading arrangements during the holiday period and make the necessary preparations in advance.The Singapore market will be closed at local time on Monday, 26 December 2022.The Hong Kong market will be closed at local time on Monday, 26 December 2022 and Tuesday, 27 December 2022.The Australian market will be closed at local time on Monday, 26 December 2022 and Tuesday, 27 December 2022 in addition to the Boxing Day.The New Zealand market will be closed at local time on Monday, 26 December 2022 and Tuesday, 27 December 2022 in addition to the Boxing Day.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":91,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9925051453,"gmtCreate":1671882121572,"gmtModify":1676538606729,"author":{"id":"3569303342488537","authorId":"3569303342488537","name":"ColeHii","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":1},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👍","listText":"👍","text":"👍","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9925051453","repostId":"1192326933","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1192326933","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1672011741,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1192326933?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-12-26 07:42","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Reminder: U.S. Market Will be Closed for Christmas Day on Monday, 26 December 2022","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1192326933","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"U.S. ChristmasDay hasarrived. The U.S. market will be closed on Monday, 26 December 2022. Please take note of the trading arrangements during the holiday period and make the necessary preparations in ","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f9c0d643f9647f8bf16257138dcbed8a\" tg-width=\"1200\" tg-height=\"602\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>U.S. Christmas Day has arrived. The U.S. market will be closed on Monday, 26 December 2022. Please take note of the trading arrangements during the holiday period and make the necessary preparations in advance.</p><p>The Singapore market will be closed at local time on Monday, 26 December 2022.</p><p>The Hong Kong market will be closed at local time on Monday, 26 December 2022 and Tuesday, 27 December 2022.</p><p>The Australian market will be closed at local time on Monday, 26 December 2022 and Tuesday, 27 December 2022 in addition to the Boxing Day.</p><p>The New Zealand market will be closed at local time on Monday, 26 December 2022 and Tuesday, 27 December 2022 in addition to the Boxing Day.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Reminder: U.S. Market Will be Closed for Christmas Day on Monday, 26 December 2022</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nReminder: U.S. Market Will be Closed for Christmas Day on Monday, 26 December 2022\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-12-26 07:42</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f9c0d643f9647f8bf16257138dcbed8a\" tg-width=\"1200\" tg-height=\"602\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>U.S. Christmas Day has arrived. The U.S. market will be closed on Monday, 26 December 2022. Please take note of the trading arrangements during the holiday period and make the necessary preparations in advance.</p><p>The Singapore market will be closed at local time on Monday, 26 December 2022.</p><p>The Hong Kong market will be closed at local time on Monday, 26 December 2022 and Tuesday, 27 December 2022.</p><p>The Australian market will be closed at local time on Monday, 26 December 2022 and Tuesday, 27 December 2022 in addition to the Boxing Day.</p><p>The New Zealand market will be closed at local time on Monday, 26 December 2022 and Tuesday, 27 December 2022 in addition to the Boxing Day.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1192326933","content_text":"U.S. Christmas Day has arrived. The U.S. market will be closed on Monday, 26 December 2022. Please take note of the trading arrangements during the holiday period and make the necessary preparations in advance.The Singapore market will be closed at local time on Monday, 26 December 2022.The Hong Kong market will be closed at local time on Monday, 26 December 2022 and Tuesday, 27 December 2022.The Australian market will be closed at local time on Monday, 26 December 2022 and Tuesday, 27 December 2022 in addition to the Boxing Day.The New Zealand market will be closed at local time on Monday, 26 December 2022 and Tuesday, 27 December 2022 in addition to the Boxing Day.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":20,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9922227245,"gmtCreate":1671780054288,"gmtModify":1676538592426,"author":{"id":"3569303342488537","authorId":"3569303342488537","name":"ColeHii","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":1},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👍","listText":"👍","text":"👍","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9922227245","repostId":"1116295728","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1116295728","pubTimestamp":1671775040,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1116295728?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-12-23 13:57","market":"us","language":"en","title":"3 Stocks to Buy Before They Surge in 2023","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1116295728","media":"InvestorPlace","summary":"These three stocks with solid underlying fundamentals can brush aside harsh economic conditions next","content":"<html><head></head><body><ul><li>These three stocks with solid underlying fundamentals can brush aside harsh economic conditions next year.</li><li><b>Visa</b>(<b><u>V</u></b>): Rising interest rates are a blessing for a business like Visa.</li><li><b>Meta Platforms</b>(<b><u>META</u></b>): The Family of Apps deserve to be valued much higher.</li><li><b>O’Reilly Automotive</b>(<b><u>ORLY</u></b>): The aging U.S. car fleet will continue to bring in profits for this company, regardless of a recession.</li></ul><p>Before you dig deeper into the stocks to buy for 2023, the path ahead is precarious. The Federal Reserve is continuing to hike rates, likely targeting a 5% terminal rate, which we could see in 2023. Moreover, the Fed aims to hold at this terminal rate for a long time, which could put interest rates above inflation. Combining that with the current economic climate, there is a good chance of a recession next year.</p><p>Conversely, many stocks are at record lows already, with little room for more decline. There are also companies that benefit from higher interest rates, such as banking companies. They could surge in 2023 regardless of a recession.</p><p>Furthermore, the stock market usually bottoms out six months before the economy does in a recession. Even under harsh economic conditions, undervalued stocks with solid fundamentals will likely surge in 2023. The following three are such stocks:</p><p><b>Visa (V)</b></p><p><b>Visa</b>(NYSE:<b><u>V</u></b>) is one of the world’s largest credit card networks. With 3.9 billion Visa cards in use processing over 255.4 billion transactions, it is a safe bet for investors looking for long-term growth. Visa’s model is a platform-based business that easily turns sales into profits and consistently delivers high margins. Its net profit margin currently sits at over 50%, unheard of in 2022 due to margin compression.</p><p>Additionally, Visa has strategically acquired and partnered with various fintech companies, helping to protect its top spot in the credit card processing market. Moreover, the recent market downturn has only caused Visa’s stock to drop 6.6% year-to-date (YTD), making it an attractive buy for investors looking for more stability. Its five-year gain is also double that of the <b>S&amp;P 500</b>.</p><p>Over the past three years, Visa has grown its EBITDA by 8.9% yearly and revenue by 10.7%. Visa’s dividend yields 0.87%, and the company has raised its dividends consecutively for the last 13 years. In addition, rising interest rates are improving profits for Visa, which is why V is one of the best stocks to buy for 2023.</p><p><b>Meta Platforms (META)</b></p><p><b>Meta Platforms</b>(NASDAQ: <b>META</b>) might look like a counterintuitive market idea in this environment, which is why it is among the most overlooked stocks in 2022. Virtual reality and blockchain-related segments are far from the spotlight, and when they are a company’s main focus, they can quickly degrade the company’s value.</p><p>However, investors need to consider that Meta still owns Facebook, WhatsApp, Instagram and Messenger. The “Family of Apps” is still Meta’s cash cow and generates enough profits to keep its metaverse project afloat. Meta made $32 billion in operating profits from the “Family of Apps,” while it spent $9.4 billion on Reality Labs in the first nine months of 2022.</p><p>Even the Metaverse project could generate profits for Meta if virtual reality starts gaining popularity in the long run. Of course, it’s too early to tell if that will ever come true. But what is clear is that Meta should not be trading at an 11x price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio. Once ad revenue snaps back and growth returns, investors will pay a much higher premium for Meta stock.</p><p>Simply put, the metaverse is a cyclical segment, and buying at the bottom is a great idea. Meta is among the top stocks to buy before the market inevitably U-turns.</p><p><b>O’Reilly Automotive (ORLY)</b></p><p><b>O’Reilly Automotive</b>(NASDAQ: <b>ORLY</b>) is up nearly 17% this year, and I expect the stock to surge even more in the coming years. As the economy deteriorates, fewer Americans are purchasing new cars. That might be bad for most car companies, but O’Reilly is an exception since its primary focus is car parts.</p><p>The U.S. civilian car fleet is aging rapidly, and the average car is 13.1 years old. It is hard to see the fleet getting younger anytime soon, as a new vehicle comes with many additional headaches, such as higher insurance costs. Thus, as fewer Americans replace their cars, auto parts retailers such as O’Reilly Automotive see profits rapidly increasing. I expect these profits to stay elevated through a recession, as getting your vehicle repaired is essential.</p></body></html>","source":"investorplace","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>3 Stocks to Buy Before They Surge in 2023</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n3 Stocks to Buy Before They Surge in 2023\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-12-23 13:57 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://investorplace.com/2022/12/3-stocks-to-buy-before-they-surge-in-2023/><strong>InvestorPlace</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>These three stocks with solid underlying fundamentals can brush aside harsh economic conditions next year.Visa(V): Rising interest rates are a blessing for a business like Visa.Meta Platforms(META): ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://investorplace.com/2022/12/3-stocks-to-buy-before-they-surge-in-2023/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"META":"Meta Platforms","ORLY":"奥莱利","V":"Visa"},"source_url":"https://investorplace.com/2022/12/3-stocks-to-buy-before-they-surge-in-2023/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1116295728","content_text":"These three stocks with solid underlying fundamentals can brush aside harsh economic conditions next year.Visa(V): Rising interest rates are a blessing for a business like Visa.Meta Platforms(META): The Family of Apps deserve to be valued much higher.O’Reilly Automotive(ORLY): The aging U.S. car fleet will continue to bring in profits for this company, regardless of a recession.Before you dig deeper into the stocks to buy for 2023, the path ahead is precarious. The Federal Reserve is continuing to hike rates, likely targeting a 5% terminal rate, which we could see in 2023. Moreover, the Fed aims to hold at this terminal rate for a long time, which could put interest rates above inflation. Combining that with the current economic climate, there is a good chance of a recession next year.Conversely, many stocks are at record lows already, with little room for more decline. There are also companies that benefit from higher interest rates, such as banking companies. They could surge in 2023 regardless of a recession.Furthermore, the stock market usually bottoms out six months before the economy does in a recession. Even under harsh economic conditions, undervalued stocks with solid fundamentals will likely surge in 2023. The following three are such stocks:Visa (V)Visa(NYSE:V) is one of the world’s largest credit card networks. With 3.9 billion Visa cards in use processing over 255.4 billion transactions, it is a safe bet for investors looking for long-term growth. Visa’s model is a platform-based business that easily turns sales into profits and consistently delivers high margins. Its net profit margin currently sits at over 50%, unheard of in 2022 due to margin compression.Additionally, Visa has strategically acquired and partnered with various fintech companies, helping to protect its top spot in the credit card processing market. Moreover, the recent market downturn has only caused Visa’s stock to drop 6.6% year-to-date (YTD), making it an attractive buy for investors looking for more stability. Its five-year gain is also double that of the S&P 500.Over the past three years, Visa has grown its EBITDA by 8.9% yearly and revenue by 10.7%. Visa’s dividend yields 0.87%, and the company has raised its dividends consecutively for the last 13 years. In addition, rising interest rates are improving profits for Visa, which is why V is one of the best stocks to buy for 2023.Meta Platforms (META)Meta Platforms(NASDAQ: META) might look like a counterintuitive market idea in this environment, which is why it is among the most overlooked stocks in 2022. Virtual reality and blockchain-related segments are far from the spotlight, and when they are a company’s main focus, they can quickly degrade the company’s value.However, investors need to consider that Meta still owns Facebook, WhatsApp, Instagram and Messenger. The “Family of Apps” is still Meta’s cash cow and generates enough profits to keep its metaverse project afloat. Meta made $32 billion in operating profits from the “Family of Apps,” while it spent $9.4 billion on Reality Labs in the first nine months of 2022.Even the Metaverse project could generate profits for Meta if virtual reality starts gaining popularity in the long run. Of course, it’s too early to tell if that will ever come true. But what is clear is that Meta should not be trading at an 11x price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio. Once ad revenue snaps back and growth returns, investors will pay a much higher premium for Meta stock.Simply put, the metaverse is a cyclical segment, and buying at the bottom is a great idea. Meta is among the top stocks to buy before the market inevitably U-turns.O’Reilly Automotive (ORLY)O’Reilly Automotive(NASDAQ: ORLY) is up nearly 17% this year, and I expect the stock to surge even more in the coming years. As the economy deteriorates, fewer Americans are purchasing new cars. That might be bad for most car companies, but O’Reilly is an exception since its primary focus is car parts.The U.S. civilian car fleet is aging rapidly, and the average car is 13.1 years old. It is hard to see the fleet getting younger anytime soon, as a new vehicle comes with many additional headaches, such as higher insurance costs. Thus, as fewer Americans replace their cars, auto parts retailers such as O’Reilly Automotive see profits rapidly increasing. I expect these profits to stay elevated through a recession, as getting your vehicle repaired is essential.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":62,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9922161703,"gmtCreate":1671719741803,"gmtModify":1676538581695,"author":{"id":"3569303342488537","authorId":"3569303342488537","name":"ColeHii","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":1},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👍","listText":"👍","text":"👍","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9922161703","repostId":"1102116872","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1102116872","pubTimestamp":1671722826,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1102116872?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-12-22 23:27","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Is a 2023 Stock-Market Rebound in Store After 2022 Selloff? ","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1102116872","media":"MarketWatch","summary":"History shows back-to-back losing years for the stocks are rare — but the size of the market’s drop ","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>History shows back-to-back losing years for the stocks are rare — but the size of the market’s drop in 2022 with no sign the Federal Reserve is ready to ride to the rescue means investors should beware, analysts warned.</p><p>With just a handful of trading days left in what is shaping up to be the worst year for the U.S. stock market in over a decade, the S&amp;P 500 index is on track to close out the year down more than 18.5%.</p><p>That is the large-cap index’s first double-digit percentage loss since 2008, when it slid 36.6% during the global financial crisis, according to Dow Jones Market Data.</p><p>However, it is extremely rare for the S&amp;P 500 to post back-to-back down years. The S&amp;P has fallen for two straight years less than 10% of the time from 1928 to 2021. In the year after a negative total annual return for the S&amp;P, the index is up by 12.6% on average and is positive 17 out of 25 years, according to data compiled by DataTrek Research.</p><p>But the market’s performance after posting a double-digit percentage drop has been less straightforward.</p><p>“The S&amp;P 500 has a much better win rate (79% vs 55%) and average performance (up 17.5% vs. 6.4%) in the 12 months following a down calendar year of less than 10% than one that does worse than that, and 2022 is shaping up to be in the latter camp,” said Jessica Rabe, co-founder of DataTrek Research, in a Tuesday note.</p><p>Rabe, however, noted that in the few instances when the S&amp;P 500 has dropped consecutive calendar years, it’s been due to a major economic event, such as the Great Depression between 1929 and 1939, or a geopolitical shock, such as the World War II and the oil crisis in 1972, or both, in the case of the early 2000s when there was the bursting of the dot-com bubble, the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks and the subsequent U.S. invasion of Iraq.</p><p>She argued that there would likely need to be another major economic or geopolitical crisis for the S&amp;P 500 to fall for a second consecutive year in 2023. However, help from the Federal Reserve in the form of lowering interest rates or a rise in federal government spending would be crucial for a bounce in the U.S. equities after a hard year.</p><p>“The Financial Crisis is a useful example to show that when times get truly difficult, fiscal and monetary policy stimulus can help the S&amp;P rebound after a horrible year,” Rabe wrote.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 booked an annual loss of over 36% in 2008 after Lehman Brothers went bankrupt under the weight of $619 billion in debt due to investments in subprime mortgages. The index was up 25.9% in the following year after the Federal Open Market Committee decided to increase the size of the Fed’s balance sheet by purchasing additional government-sponsored agency mortgage-backed securities, in response to the severity of the economic contraction.</p><p>However, Wall Street strategists warned stock-market investors that they should not expect any form of “Fed put” next year.</p><p>Investors have talked of a figurative Fed put since at least the October 1987 stock-market crash prompted the Alan Greenspan-led central bank to lower interest rates. An actual put option is a financial derivative that gives the holder the right but not the obligation to sell the underlying asset at a set level, known as the strike price, serving as an insurance policy against a market decline.</p><p>Victoria Fernandez, chief market strategist at Crossmark Global Investments, thinks the Fed is going to let the market work through the “shallow recession” in 2023 and not immediately jump in and cut rates.</p><p>“Historically we assumed and knew that we would have a ‘Fed put’, that immediately Fed steps in and handles it for us. But what Powell is trying to make markets understand is, hey, we are not going to be doing this,” Fernandez told MarketWatch on Tuesday.</p><p>“They’re just willy-nilly trying to drive us over the cliff,” she added.</p><p>“That’s why U.S. equities are so volatile just now, as no one knows when the Fed will pivot to being more accommodative. Chair Powell is solely focused on bringing down inflation to the Fed’s 2% target and he has the latitude to do so given the strength of the U.S. labor market,” said Rabe at DataTrek.</p><p>U.S. stocks rallied on Wednesday after snapping four-day losing streak in the previous session. The Dow Jones Industrial Average ended 1.6% higher, but was on pace to book an annual loss of 8.2%. The Nasdaq Composite climbed 1.5%, but has decreased by 31.5% year-to-date. The S&amp;P 500 gained 56.82 points, or 1.5%, finishing at 3,878.44.</p><p>David Wagner, portfolio manager for Aptus Capital Advisors in Cincinnati, told MarketWatch that he expects the stock market to experience less pain and less price volatility next year, but that doesn’t mean investors will see positive market returns.</p><p>“We believe that a policy error has already been committed by the Fed. The real and long-lasting policy error would be if inflation were to become unanchored, thus the emphasis on the market focusing on price stability, specifically wage inflation, in the near-term,” Wagner said.</p><p>“History shows us that markets are a sprint lower and a marathon higher. With the potential for slowing global growth and a less accommodative Fed, this marathon may include more hills than plains, which could create constant volatility in the market,” he said.</p></body></html>","source":"lsy1603348471595","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Is a 2023 Stock-Market Rebound in Store After 2022 Selloff? </title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nIs a 2023 Stock-Market Rebound in Store After 2022 Selloff? \n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-12-22 23:27 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.marketwatch.com/story/is-a-2023-stock-market-rebound-in-store-after-2022-selloff-what-history-says-about-back-to-back-losing-years-11671650574?mod=hp_LATEST&adobe_mc=MCMID%3D03250748340802259633376614514522268876%7CMCORGID%3DCB68E4BA55144CAA0A4C98A5%2540AdobeOrg%7CTS%3D1671693265><strong>MarketWatch</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>History shows back-to-back losing years for the stocks are rare — but the size of the market’s drop in 2022 with no sign the Federal Reserve is ready to ride to the rescue means investors should ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/is-a-2023-stock-market-rebound-in-store-after-2022-selloff-what-history-says-about-back-to-back-losing-years-11671650574?mod=hp_LATEST&adobe_mc=MCMID%3D03250748340802259633376614514522268876%7CMCORGID%3DCB68E4BA55144CAA0A4C98A5%2540AdobeOrg%7CTS%3D1671693265\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/is-a-2023-stock-market-rebound-in-store-after-2022-selloff-what-history-says-about-back-to-back-losing-years-11671650574?mod=hp_LATEST&adobe_mc=MCMID%3D03250748340802259633376614514522268876%7CMCORGID%3DCB68E4BA55144CAA0A4C98A5%2540AdobeOrg%7CTS%3D1671693265","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1102116872","content_text":"History shows back-to-back losing years for the stocks are rare — but the size of the market’s drop in 2022 with no sign the Federal Reserve is ready to ride to the rescue means investors should beware, analysts warned.With just a handful of trading days left in what is shaping up to be the worst year for the U.S. stock market in over a decade, the S&P 500 index is on track to close out the year down more than 18.5%.That is the large-cap index’s first double-digit percentage loss since 2008, when it slid 36.6% during the global financial crisis, according to Dow Jones Market Data.However, it is extremely rare for the S&P 500 to post back-to-back down years. The S&P has fallen for two straight years less than 10% of the time from 1928 to 2021. In the year after a negative total annual return for the S&P, the index is up by 12.6% on average and is positive 17 out of 25 years, according to data compiled by DataTrek Research.But the market’s performance after posting a double-digit percentage drop has been less straightforward.“The S&P 500 has a much better win rate (79% vs 55%) and average performance (up 17.5% vs. 6.4%) in the 12 months following a down calendar year of less than 10% than one that does worse than that, and 2022 is shaping up to be in the latter camp,” said Jessica Rabe, co-founder of DataTrek Research, in a Tuesday note.Rabe, however, noted that in the few instances when the S&P 500 has dropped consecutive calendar years, it’s been due to a major economic event, such as the Great Depression between 1929 and 1939, or a geopolitical shock, such as the World War II and the oil crisis in 1972, or both, in the case of the early 2000s when there was the bursting of the dot-com bubble, the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks and the subsequent U.S. invasion of Iraq.She argued that there would likely need to be another major economic or geopolitical crisis for the S&P 500 to fall for a second consecutive year in 2023. However, help from the Federal Reserve in the form of lowering interest rates or a rise in federal government spending would be crucial for a bounce in the U.S. equities after a hard year.“The Financial Crisis is a useful example to show that when times get truly difficult, fiscal and monetary policy stimulus can help the S&P rebound after a horrible year,” Rabe wrote.The S&P 500 booked an annual loss of over 36% in 2008 after Lehman Brothers went bankrupt under the weight of $619 billion in debt due to investments in subprime mortgages. The index was up 25.9% in the following year after the Federal Open Market Committee decided to increase the size of the Fed’s balance sheet by purchasing additional government-sponsored agency mortgage-backed securities, in response to the severity of the economic contraction.However, Wall Street strategists warned stock-market investors that they should not expect any form of “Fed put” next year.Investors have talked of a figurative Fed put since at least the October 1987 stock-market crash prompted the Alan Greenspan-led central bank to lower interest rates. An actual put option is a financial derivative that gives the holder the right but not the obligation to sell the underlying asset at a set level, known as the strike price, serving as an insurance policy against a market decline.Victoria Fernandez, chief market strategist at Crossmark Global Investments, thinks the Fed is going to let the market work through the “shallow recession” in 2023 and not immediately jump in and cut rates.“Historically we assumed and knew that we would have a ‘Fed put’, that immediately Fed steps in and handles it for us. But what Powell is trying to make markets understand is, hey, we are not going to be doing this,” Fernandez told MarketWatch on Tuesday.“They’re just willy-nilly trying to drive us over the cliff,” she added.“That’s why U.S. equities are so volatile just now, as no one knows when the Fed will pivot to being more accommodative. Chair Powell is solely focused on bringing down inflation to the Fed’s 2% target and he has the latitude to do so given the strength of the U.S. labor market,” said Rabe at DataTrek.U.S. stocks rallied on Wednesday after snapping four-day losing streak in the previous session. The Dow Jones Industrial Average ended 1.6% higher, but was on pace to book an annual loss of 8.2%. The Nasdaq Composite climbed 1.5%, but has decreased by 31.5% year-to-date. The S&P 500 gained 56.82 points, or 1.5%, finishing at 3,878.44.David Wagner, portfolio manager for Aptus Capital Advisors in Cincinnati, told MarketWatch that he expects the stock market to experience less pain and less price volatility next year, but that doesn’t mean investors will see positive market returns.“We believe that a policy error has already been committed by the Fed. The real and long-lasting policy error would be if inflation were to become unanchored, thus the emphasis on the market focusing on price stability, specifically wage inflation, in the near-term,” Wagner said.“History shows us that markets are a sprint lower and a marathon higher. With the potential for slowing global growth and a less accommodative Fed, this marathon may include more hills than plains, which could create constant volatility in the market,” he said.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":78,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9926474055,"gmtCreate":1671624190077,"gmtModify":1676538565360,"author":{"id":"3569303342488537","authorId":"3569303342488537","name":"ColeHii","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":1},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👍","listText":"👍","text":"👍","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9926474055","repostId":"1169610873","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1169610873","pubTimestamp":1671610381,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1169610873?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-12-21 16:13","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Tesla Is Now Worth Less Than Exxon As Stock Plunges Toward Worst Month, Quarter and Year in History","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1169610873","media":"MarketWatch","summary":"Stock falls another 8% after Evercore analysts slash price target and write ‘the $150-163 technical ","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Stock falls another 8% after Evercore analysts slash price target and write ‘the $150-163 technical level was seen as a critical battle line to defend beyond further weakness . . . and failed’</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/34aeaea629a08889be43db7977d7e931\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Evercore analysts slashed their price target on Tesla on Tuesday.</span></p><p>Tesla Inc. shares declined more than 8% on Tuesday, pushing the electric-vehicle maker’s valuation lower than oil giant Exxon Mobil Corp. after the stock’s previous descent below a “critical battle line” of $150 a share.</p><p>Shares of Tesla fell 8.1% to $141.80 on Tuesday after closing lower than $150 for the first time in more than two years Monday, a level that analysts said was a key test of investors’ faith in the stock. Tuesday’s decline was the worst of the day in the S&amp;P 500 index, and Tesla shares were also the most active on the index as they wrapped up a three-session losing streak that has wiped 12.6% off the stock collectively.</p><p>The stock is now down more than 48% this quarter, which would easily be its worst calendar quarter in history, eclipsing a 37.5% decline in the second quarter of this year. It is also down more than 29% for the month of December, which would be its worst month on record, beating a 24.6% decline in December 2010.</p><p>Tesla stock has fallen 60.9% so far in 2022 — which would also be its worst year on record — and Tesla’s market capitalization fell behind two other S&amp;P 500 companies on Tuesday: Johnson &amp; Johnson and Exxon Mobil. Tesla is now the ninth most valuable equity by market cap in the S&amp;P 500 index after previously ranking as high as No. 5 on that list, behind only Apple Inc., Microsoft Corp., Alphabet Inc. and Amazon.com Inc.</p><p>Evercore analysts Chris McNally, Doug Dutton and Isaac Avla on Tuesday chopped their price target on the electric-vehicle maker’s stock to $200 from $300 in a note, saying the company’s strengths are already appreciated by investors and that “emotional” support for the stock is breaking down.</p><p>Elon Musk, Tesla’s chief executive, has sold billions in stock since he bought Twitter for $44 billion in October, and has not signaled he is done selling, which the analysts noted was a contributing factor in the cut to the price target.</p><p>“We now know Elon sold another $3.5Bn and we have yet to receive the ‘all done’ tweet,” the analysts said in a note on Tuesday. “The $150-163 technical level was seen as a critical battle line to defend beyond further weakness . . . and failed.”</p><p>“Technicals are essentially emotional stock entry points and we’re now at a spot that if you bought Tesla 2 years ago, you have lost money,” they continued.</p><p>The Evercore analysts praised Tesla’s margin profile, but said investors “are already well aware of these benefits but now must also battle test demand assumptions” for next year through 2025. They wrote that growth has stalled in China, where Tesla holds about 10% of the electric-vehicle market, and that a “partisan elephant in the room” has become tougher to ignore as Musk tweets out more right-wing rhetoric.</p><p>“Investors now fear U.S. brand damage given typical EV buyer demographics (~40% from CA, maybe 70%+ from blue states) in dwindling backlog environment,” the analysts wrote.</p><p>The remarks added to concern about shares of Tesla, which suffered their worst week since 2020 last week after Musk disclosed the sale of $3.5 billion in Tesla stock and a large investor, Leo KoGuan, called for new leadership at the electric-vehicle maker. The stock sale marked the second time Musk has unloaded a big chunk of shares of Tesla since he bought Twitter.</p><p>Other Tesla analysts this week have expressed increasing frustration with Musk’s activity on Twitter. They said his erratic rule there — which most recently included the temporary suspension of journalists, blocking links to other social platforms, and holding an online poll in which a majority of Twitter users said he should “step down as head of Twitter” — has distracted him from running Tesla. Others have expressed concern that the tumult there, along with the reinstatement of far-right accounts, risked starving the company of ad revenue.</p><p>Oppenheimer analysts on Monday downgraded Tesla stock, saying his “non-Tesla endeavors” had become difficult to separate from their analysis of Tesla. Wedbush analyst Dan Ives said in a note on Monday that Musk had been using Tesla shares as “his own personal ATM” and that his ownership of Twitter had become an “albatross” for Tesla.</p><p>“Time to end this nightmare as CEO of Twitter,” Ives wrote.</p></body></html>","source":"lsy1603348471595","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Tesla Is Now Worth Less Than Exxon As Stock Plunges Toward Worst Month, Quarter and Year in History</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTesla Is Now Worth Less Than Exxon As Stock Plunges Toward Worst Month, Quarter and Year in History\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-12-21 16:13 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.marketwatch.com/story/after-tesla-stock-lost-critical-battle-line-shares-plunge-toward-worst-month-quarter-and-year-in-history-11671561980?mod=home-page><strong>MarketWatch</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Stock falls another 8% after Evercore analysts slash price target and write ‘the $150-163 technical level was seen as a critical battle line to defend beyond further weakness . . . and failed’Evercore...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/after-tesla-stock-lost-critical-battle-line-shares-plunge-toward-worst-month-quarter-and-year-in-history-11671561980?mod=home-page\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/after-tesla-stock-lost-critical-battle-line-shares-plunge-toward-worst-month-quarter-and-year-in-history-11671561980?mod=home-page","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1169610873","content_text":"Stock falls another 8% after Evercore analysts slash price target and write ‘the $150-163 technical level was seen as a critical battle line to defend beyond further weakness . . . and failed’Evercore analysts slashed their price target on Tesla on Tuesday.Tesla Inc. shares declined more than 8% on Tuesday, pushing the electric-vehicle maker’s valuation lower than oil giant Exxon Mobil Corp. after the stock’s previous descent below a “critical battle line” of $150 a share.Shares of Tesla fell 8.1% to $141.80 on Tuesday after closing lower than $150 for the first time in more than two years Monday, a level that analysts said was a key test of investors’ faith in the stock. Tuesday’s decline was the worst of the day in the S&P 500 index, and Tesla shares were also the most active on the index as they wrapped up a three-session losing streak that has wiped 12.6% off the stock collectively.The stock is now down more than 48% this quarter, which would easily be its worst calendar quarter in history, eclipsing a 37.5% decline in the second quarter of this year. It is also down more than 29% for the month of December, which would be its worst month on record, beating a 24.6% decline in December 2010.Tesla stock has fallen 60.9% so far in 2022 — which would also be its worst year on record — and Tesla’s market capitalization fell behind two other S&P 500 companies on Tuesday: Johnson & Johnson and Exxon Mobil. Tesla is now the ninth most valuable equity by market cap in the S&P 500 index after previously ranking as high as No. 5 on that list, behind only Apple Inc., Microsoft Corp., Alphabet Inc. and Amazon.com Inc.Evercore analysts Chris McNally, Doug Dutton and Isaac Avla on Tuesday chopped their price target on the electric-vehicle maker’s stock to $200 from $300 in a note, saying the company’s strengths are already appreciated by investors and that “emotional” support for the stock is breaking down.Elon Musk, Tesla’s chief executive, has sold billions in stock since he bought Twitter for $44 billion in October, and has not signaled he is done selling, which the analysts noted was a contributing factor in the cut to the price target.“We now know Elon sold another $3.5Bn and we have yet to receive the ‘all done’ tweet,” the analysts said in a note on Tuesday. “The $150-163 technical level was seen as a critical battle line to defend beyond further weakness . . . and failed.”“Technicals are essentially emotional stock entry points and we’re now at a spot that if you bought Tesla 2 years ago, you have lost money,” they continued.The Evercore analysts praised Tesla’s margin profile, but said investors “are already well aware of these benefits but now must also battle test demand assumptions” for next year through 2025. They wrote that growth has stalled in China, where Tesla holds about 10% of the electric-vehicle market, and that a “partisan elephant in the room” has become tougher to ignore as Musk tweets out more right-wing rhetoric.“Investors now fear U.S. brand damage given typical EV buyer demographics (~40% from CA, maybe 70%+ from blue states) in dwindling backlog environment,” the analysts wrote.The remarks added to concern about shares of Tesla, which suffered their worst week since 2020 last week after Musk disclosed the sale of $3.5 billion in Tesla stock and a large investor, Leo KoGuan, called for new leadership at the electric-vehicle maker. The stock sale marked the second time Musk has unloaded a big chunk of shares of Tesla since he bought Twitter.Other Tesla analysts this week have expressed increasing frustration with Musk’s activity on Twitter. They said his erratic rule there — which most recently included the temporary suspension of journalists, blocking links to other social platforms, and holding an online poll in which a majority of Twitter users said he should “step down as head of Twitter” — has distracted him from running Tesla. Others have expressed concern that the tumult there, along with the reinstatement of far-right accounts, risked starving the company of ad revenue.Oppenheimer analysts on Monday downgraded Tesla stock, saying his “non-Tesla endeavors” had become difficult to separate from their analysis of Tesla. Wedbush analyst Dan Ives said in a note on Monday that Musk had been using Tesla shares as “his own personal ATM” and that his ownership of Twitter had become an “albatross” for Tesla.“Time to end this nightmare as CEO of Twitter,” Ives wrote.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":85,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":9951643968,"gmtCreate":1673480999354,"gmtModify":1676538843112,"author":{"id":"3569303342488537","authorId":"3569303342488537","name":"ColeHii","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":1},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👍","listText":"👍","text":"👍","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":16,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9951643968","repostId":"2302840328","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2302840328","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1673476494,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2302840328?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2023-01-12 06:34","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Wall St Ends Sharply Higher on Optimism Before Key Inflation Report","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2302840328","media":"Reuters","summary":"* CPI report due Thursday before the bell* Bed, Bath & Beyond extends recent gains* Indexes: Dow up ","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>* CPI report due Thursday before the bell</p><p>* Bed, Bath &amp; Beyond extends recent gains</p><p>* Indexes: Dow up 0.8%, S&amp;P 500 up 1.3%, Nasdaq up 1.8%</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f423a7d52d3e3199f0c20726990a22ba\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"1920\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>NEW YORK, Jan 11 (Reuters) - U.S. stocks ended up sharply on Wednesday, with the S&amp;P 500 and Nasdaq gaining more than 1% each as investors were optimistic ahead of an inflation report that could give the Federal Reserve room to dial back on its aggressive interest rate hikes.</p><p>The much-anticipated report due on Thursday is projected by economists polled by Reuters to show U.S. consumer prices grew 6.5% year-on-year in December, moderating from a 7.1% rise in November.</p><p>Among sectors, real estate and consumer discretionary were the day&#39;s strongest performers, while Microsoft, Amazon.com and other mega-cap growth names gave the S&amp;P 500 its biggest boost.</p><p>The benchmark index is up so far for 2023 after falling sharply last year. Hopes that the Fed could soon ease back on its aggressive tightening after raising the federal funds rate seven times in 2022 have boosted the market in recent sessions, even as comments by some Fed officials have supported the view that the central bank needs to remain vigilant about raising rates to fight inflation.</p><p>&#34;Investors are anticipating that we&#39;re closer to a pause than at any other point last year,&#34; said Jake Dollarhide, chief executive officer of Longbow Asset Management in Tulsa, Oklahoma. He said that would be welcomed by the market.</p><p>Also, &#34;any time you have a down year, it&#39;s not surprising many times to have a reversal at the start of the new year,&#34; he said.</p><p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 268.91 points, or 0.8%, to 33,973.01, the S&amp;P 500 gained 50.36 points, or 1.28%, to 3,969.61 and the Nasdaq Composite added 189.04 points, or 1.76%, to 10,931.67.</p><p>Money market participants see a 75% chance the Fed will raise the benchmark rate by 25 basis points in February.</p><p>This week also marks the start of the fourth-quarter earnings season for S&amp;P 500 companies, with overall S&amp;P 500 earnings expected to have declined year-over-year, according to IBES data from Refinitiv.</p><p>The biggest U.S. banks, which kick off the season later this week, are expected to report lower quarterly earnings as risks of a recession rise due to monetary policy tightening.</p><p>Goldman Sachs began laying off staff on Wednesday in a sweeping cost-cutting drive, a source familiar with the matter said. Shares of Goldman Sachs ended up 2%.</p><p>Retailer Bed Bath &amp; Beyond Inc sharply extended recent gains to end up 68.6% despite bleak quarterly results, with some investors speculating it could be a potential acquisition target.</p><p>Volume on U.S. exchanges was 11.42 billion shares, compared with the 11 billion average for the full session over the last 20 trading days.</p><p>Advancing issues outnumbered declining ones on the NYSE by a 3.78-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 2.25-to-1 ratio favored advancers.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 posted 11 new 52-week highs and 1 new low; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 98 new highs and 20 new lows.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Wall St Ends Sharply Higher on Optimism Before Key Inflation Report</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWall St Ends Sharply Higher on Optimism Before Key Inflation Report\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2023-01-12 06:34</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>* CPI report due Thursday before the bell</p><p>* Bed, Bath &amp; Beyond extends recent gains</p><p>* Indexes: Dow up 0.8%, S&amp;P 500 up 1.3%, Nasdaq up 1.8%</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f423a7d52d3e3199f0c20726990a22ba\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"1920\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>NEW YORK, Jan 11 (Reuters) - U.S. stocks ended up sharply on Wednesday, with the S&amp;P 500 and Nasdaq gaining more than 1% each as investors were optimistic ahead of an inflation report that could give the Federal Reserve room to dial back on its aggressive interest rate hikes.</p><p>The much-anticipated report due on Thursday is projected by economists polled by Reuters to show U.S. consumer prices grew 6.5% year-on-year in December, moderating from a 7.1% rise in November.</p><p>Among sectors, real estate and consumer discretionary were the day&#39;s strongest performers, while Microsoft, Amazon.com and other mega-cap growth names gave the S&amp;P 500 its biggest boost.</p><p>The benchmark index is up so far for 2023 after falling sharply last year. Hopes that the Fed could soon ease back on its aggressive tightening after raising the federal funds rate seven times in 2022 have boosted the market in recent sessions, even as comments by some Fed officials have supported the view that the central bank needs to remain vigilant about raising rates to fight inflation.</p><p>&#34;Investors are anticipating that we&#39;re closer to a pause than at any other point last year,&#34; said Jake Dollarhide, chief executive officer of Longbow Asset Management in Tulsa, Oklahoma. He said that would be welcomed by the market.</p><p>Also, &#34;any time you have a down year, it&#39;s not surprising many times to have a reversal at the start of the new year,&#34; he said.</p><p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 268.91 points, or 0.8%, to 33,973.01, the S&amp;P 500 gained 50.36 points, or 1.28%, to 3,969.61 and the Nasdaq Composite added 189.04 points, or 1.76%, to 10,931.67.</p><p>Money market participants see a 75% chance the Fed will raise the benchmark rate by 25 basis points in February.</p><p>This week also marks the start of the fourth-quarter earnings season for S&amp;P 500 companies, with overall S&amp;P 500 earnings expected to have declined year-over-year, according to IBES data from Refinitiv.</p><p>The biggest U.S. banks, which kick off the season later this week, are expected to report lower quarterly earnings as risks of a recession rise due to monetary policy tightening.</p><p>Goldman Sachs began laying off staff on Wednesday in a sweeping cost-cutting drive, a source familiar with the matter said. Shares of Goldman Sachs ended up 2%.</p><p>Retailer Bed Bath &amp; Beyond Inc sharply extended recent gains to end up 68.6% despite bleak quarterly results, with some investors speculating it could be a potential acquisition target.</p><p>Volume on U.S. exchanges was 11.42 billion shares, compared with the 11 billion average for the full session over the last 20 trading days.</p><p>Advancing issues outnumbered declining ones on the NYSE by a 3.78-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 2.25-to-1 ratio favored advancers.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 posted 11 new 52-week highs and 1 new low; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 98 new highs and 20 new lows.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BK4535":"淡马锡持仓","BK4524":"宅经济概念","BK4559":"巴菲特持仓","BK4527":"明星科技股","LU0130102774.USD":"Natixis Harris Associates US Equity RA USD","BK4579":"人工智能","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓","BK4552":"Archegos爆仓风波概念","IE00B1BXHZ80.USD":"Legg Mason ClearBridge - US Appreciation A Acc USD","BK4503":"景林资产持仓","LU0648001328.SGD":"Natixis Harris Associates US Equity RA SGD","BK4122":"互联网与直销零售","LU0276348264.USD":"THREADNEEDLE (LUX) GLOBAL DYNAMIC REAL RETURN\"AUP\" (USD) INC","LU0316494557.USD":"FRANKLIN GLOBAL FUNDAMENTAL STRATEGIES \"A\" ACC","BK4561":"索罗斯持仓","LU0211328371.USD":"TEMPLETON GLOBAL EQUITY INCOME \"A\" (MDIS) (USD)   INC","LU0354030511.USD":"ALLSPRING  U.S. LARGE CAP GROWTH \"I\" (USD) ACC","LU0211327993.USD":"TEMPLETON GLOBAL EQUITY INCOME \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU0708995401.HKD":"FRANKLIN U.S. OPPORTUNITIES \"A\" (HKD) ACC","LU0127658192.USD":"EASTSPRING INVESTMENTS GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY \"A\" (USD) ACC","BK4581":"高盛持仓","LU0354030438.USD":"富国美国大盘成长基金Cl A Acc","IE00BJTD4N35.SGD":"Neuberger Berman US Long Short Equity A1  Acc SGD-H","LU0256863811.USD":"ALLIANZ US EQUITY \"A\" INC","BK4548":"巴美列捷福持仓","LU0528227936.USD":"富达环球人口趋势基金A-ACC","AMZN":"亚马逊","LU0234570918.USD":"高盛全球核心股票组合Acc Close","IE0004445239.USD":"JANUS HENDERSON US FORTY \"A2\" (USD) ACC","IE00B19Z9505.USD":"美盛-美国大盘成长股A Acc","LU0642271901.SGD":"Janus Henderson Horizon Global Technology Leaders A2 SGD-H","BK4554":"元宇宙及AR概念","BK4178":"家庭装饰零售","LU0640476718.USD":"THREADNEEDLE (LUX) US CONTRARIAN CORE EQ \"AU\" (USD) ACC","IE00B1XK9C88.USD":"PINEBRIDGE US LARGE CAP RESEARCH ENHANCED \"A\" (USD) ACC","MSFT":"微软","BK4507":"流媒体概念","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓",".DJI":"道琼斯","GS":"高盛","BK4533":"AQR资本管理(全球第二大对冲基金)","IE00BSNM7G36.USD":"NEUBERGER BERMAN SYSTEMATIC GLOBAL SUSTAINABLE VALUE \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU0310799852.SGD":"FTIF - Templeton Global Equity Income A MDIS SGD",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite","BBBY":"3B家居",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2302840328","content_text":"* CPI report due Thursday before the bell* Bed, Bath & Beyond extends recent gains* Indexes: Dow up 0.8%, S&P 500 up 1.3%, Nasdaq up 1.8%NEW YORK, Jan 11 (Reuters) - U.S. stocks ended up sharply on Wednesday, with the S&P 500 and Nasdaq gaining more than 1% each as investors were optimistic ahead of an inflation report that could give the Federal Reserve room to dial back on its aggressive interest rate hikes.The much-anticipated report due on Thursday is projected by economists polled by Reuters to show U.S. consumer prices grew 6.5% year-on-year in December, moderating from a 7.1% rise in November.Among sectors, real estate and consumer discretionary were the day's strongest performers, while Microsoft, Amazon.com and other mega-cap growth names gave the S&P 500 its biggest boost.The benchmark index is up so far for 2023 after falling sharply last year. Hopes that the Fed could soon ease back on its aggressive tightening after raising the federal funds rate seven times in 2022 have boosted the market in recent sessions, even as comments by some Fed officials have supported the view that the central bank needs to remain vigilant about raising rates to fight inflation.\"Investors are anticipating that we're closer to a pause than at any other point last year,\" said Jake Dollarhide, chief executive officer of Longbow Asset Management in Tulsa, Oklahoma. He said that would be welcomed by the market.Also, \"any time you have a down year, it's not surprising many times to have a reversal at the start of the new year,\" he said.The Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 268.91 points, or 0.8%, to 33,973.01, the S&P 500 gained 50.36 points, or 1.28%, to 3,969.61 and the Nasdaq Composite added 189.04 points, or 1.76%, to 10,931.67.Money market participants see a 75% chance the Fed will raise the benchmark rate by 25 basis points in February.This week also marks the start of the fourth-quarter earnings season for S&P 500 companies, with overall S&P 500 earnings expected to have declined year-over-year, according to IBES data from Refinitiv.The biggest U.S. banks, which kick off the season later this week, are expected to report lower quarterly earnings as risks of a recession rise due to monetary policy tightening.Goldman Sachs began laying off staff on Wednesday in a sweeping cost-cutting drive, a source familiar with the matter said. Shares of Goldman Sachs ended up 2%.Retailer Bed Bath & Beyond Inc sharply extended recent gains to end up 68.6% despite bleak quarterly results, with some investors speculating it could be a potential acquisition target.Volume on U.S. exchanges was 11.42 billion shares, compared with the 11 billion average for the full session over the last 20 trading days.Advancing issues outnumbered declining ones on the NYSE by a 3.78-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 2.25-to-1 ratio favored advancers.The S&P 500 posted 11 new 52-week highs and 1 new low; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 98 new highs and 20 new lows.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":332,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9963454853,"gmtCreate":1668741547372,"gmtModify":1676538106388,"author":{"id":"3569303342488537","authorId":"3569303342488537","name":"ColeHii","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":1},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👍","listText":"👍","text":"👍","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":9,"commentSize":4,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9963454853","repostId":"1103280772","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1103280772","pubTimestamp":1668736676,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1103280772?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-11-18 09:57","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Bullard Sets Tone for Fed Officials Signaling Hikes Will Roll On","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1103280772","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"Borrowing costs should be high enough to curb inflationTightening has had limited effect on prices s","content":"<html><head></head><body><ul><li>Borrowing costs should be high enough to curb inflation</li><li>Tightening has had limited effect on prices so far, he says</li></ul><p>St. Louis Fed President James Bullard said policymakers should raise interest rates to at least 5% to 5.25%, hitting financial markets as investors recalibrated bets on how high officials would go.</p><p>“In the past I have said 4.75% to 5%,” he told reporters Thursday after giving a speech in Louisville, Kentucky. “Based on this analysis today, I would say 5% to 5.25%. That’s a minimum level. According to this analysis, that would at least get us in the zone.”</p><p>Chair Jerome Powell said earlier this month that rates will need to rise more than previously expected due to disappointing inflation data, while suggesting that officials could moderate the size of their increases going forward. A key reading on consumer prices since then was better than expected but policymakers continue to stress the need to keep raising rates.</p><p>Officials in September had projected rates rising to around 4.6% next year from a current target range of 3.75% to 4%. Those projections will be updated at the Fed’s Dec. 13-14 meeting.</p><p>US 10-year Treasury yields climbed after Bullard became the latest official to say that interest rates had further to rise to curb the strongest inflation in 40 years.</p><p>San Francisco Fed President Mary Daly said on Wednesday that “somewhere between 4.75 and 5.25 seems a reasonable place to think about” for the level that officials should raise rates to then go on hold.</p><p>Bullard’s hawkish tone was echoed later on Thursday by Minneapolis Fed President Neel Kashkari, whosaidit’s an “open question” how far the central bank has to go with rates to bring demand back into balance.</p><p>“I need to be convinced that inflation has at least stopped climbing, that we’re not falling further behind the curve before I would advocate stopping a progression of future rate hikes, so we’re not there yet,” he told the Minnesota Chamber of Commerce’s 2022 Economic Summit.</p><p>“The Fed is still maintaining a outward appearance of hawkishness pending another month of inflation data,” said Guy LeBas, chief fixed-income strategist for Janney Montgomery Scott LLC in Philadelphia. “One month of lower inflation doesn’t mean the war is over.”</p><p>Data last week showed consumer inflation rising by a less-than-expected 7.7% in the 12 months through October. November’s reading will be released on Dec. 13, before officials begin their two days of policy deliberations.</p><p>During his presentation, Bullard showed charts that indicated rates will need to be between about 5% to 7% to meet policymakers’ goal of being “sufficiently restrictive” to curb inflation near a four-decade high.</p><p>The calculation used different versions of a Taylor Rule, a popular monetary policy guideline developed by Stanford University’s John Taylor.</p><h3>‘Minimal’ Level</h3><p>“It’s easy to make arguments that before this is all over you’d have to go to much higher levels of the policy rate” than 5.25%, said Bullard, who votes on policy this year. “But for now I’d be happy to get to the minimal level and that’s why I think the committee is going to have to do more.”</p><p>The St. Louis Fed leader, who has been among the more hawkish policymakers this year, was the latest central banker to call for additional action.</p><p>The Fed raised rates by 75 basis points on Nov. 2 for the fourth straight time as part of its most aggressive tightening since the 1980s to curb an inflation that started in the wake of the Covid-19 pandemic disruptions.</p><p>Bullard didn’t say whether he would favor a 50 or 75 basis-point move at the Fed’s December meeting, telling reporters that he would look to Powell to set the direction.</p><p>A number of his colleagues have called for a downshift in the size of the next rate increase following last week’s consumer price report, which showed a softening in core consumer goods inflation in October.</p><p>Investors expect the Fed will raise rates by a half percentage point next month and see rates peaking around 5% next year.</p><p>The St. Louis Fed president said he expected officials to keep rates high for an extended period to avoid the kind of monetary policy mistakes of the 1970s that resulted in persistently high inflation.</p><p>“We certainly don’t want to replay that episode,” he told reporters. “So we’re going to have to see very tangible evidence that inflation’s coming down meaningfully toward target, and I think we’re going to want to err on the side of staying higher for longer in order to get that to happen.”</p><p>Bullard said while he expected inflation to come down next year, there’s been relatively little evidence of that so far.</p><p>“Thus far, the change in the monetary-policy stance appears to have had only limited effects on observed inflation, but market pricing suggests disinflation is expected in 2023,” Bullard said in his prepared remarks, adding rate hikes so far have caused little financial stress.</p></body></html>","source":"lsy1584095487587","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Bullard Sets Tone for Fed Officials Signaling Hikes Will Roll On</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBullard Sets Tone for Fed Officials Signaling Hikes Will Roll On\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-11-18 09:57 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-11-17/fed-s-bullard-says-more-hikes-needed-to-get-to-restrictive-level><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Borrowing costs should be high enough to curb inflationTightening has had limited effect on prices so far, he saysSt. Louis Fed President James Bullard said policymakers should raise interest rates to...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-11-17/fed-s-bullard-says-more-hikes-needed-to-get-to-restrictive-level\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-11-17/fed-s-bullard-says-more-hikes-needed-to-get-to-restrictive-level","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1103280772","content_text":"Borrowing costs should be high enough to curb inflationTightening has had limited effect on prices so far, he saysSt. Louis Fed President James Bullard said policymakers should raise interest rates to at least 5% to 5.25%, hitting financial markets as investors recalibrated bets on how high officials would go.“In the past I have said 4.75% to 5%,” he told reporters Thursday after giving a speech in Louisville, Kentucky. “Based on this analysis today, I would say 5% to 5.25%. That’s a minimum level. According to this analysis, that would at least get us in the zone.”Chair Jerome Powell said earlier this month that rates will need to rise more than previously expected due to disappointing inflation data, while suggesting that officials could moderate the size of their increases going forward. A key reading on consumer prices since then was better than expected but policymakers continue to stress the need to keep raising rates.Officials in September had projected rates rising to around 4.6% next year from a current target range of 3.75% to 4%. Those projections will be updated at the Fed’s Dec. 13-14 meeting.US 10-year Treasury yields climbed after Bullard became the latest official to say that interest rates had further to rise to curb the strongest inflation in 40 years.San Francisco Fed President Mary Daly said on Wednesday that “somewhere between 4.75 and 5.25 seems a reasonable place to think about” for the level that officials should raise rates to then go on hold.Bullard’s hawkish tone was echoed later on Thursday by Minneapolis Fed President Neel Kashkari, whosaidit’s an “open question” how far the central bank has to go with rates to bring demand back into balance.“I need to be convinced that inflation has at least stopped climbing, that we’re not falling further behind the curve before I would advocate stopping a progression of future rate hikes, so we’re not there yet,” he told the Minnesota Chamber of Commerce’s 2022 Economic Summit.“The Fed is still maintaining a outward appearance of hawkishness pending another month of inflation data,” said Guy LeBas, chief fixed-income strategist for Janney Montgomery Scott LLC in Philadelphia. “One month of lower inflation doesn’t mean the war is over.”Data last week showed consumer inflation rising by a less-than-expected 7.7% in the 12 months through October. November’s reading will be released on Dec. 13, before officials begin their two days of policy deliberations.During his presentation, Bullard showed charts that indicated rates will need to be between about 5% to 7% to meet policymakers’ goal of being “sufficiently restrictive” to curb inflation near a four-decade high.The calculation used different versions of a Taylor Rule, a popular monetary policy guideline developed by Stanford University’s John Taylor.‘Minimal’ Level“It’s easy to make arguments that before this is all over you’d have to go to much higher levels of the policy rate” than 5.25%, said Bullard, who votes on policy this year. “But for now I’d be happy to get to the minimal level and that’s why I think the committee is going to have to do more.”The St. Louis Fed leader, who has been among the more hawkish policymakers this year, was the latest central banker to call for additional action.The Fed raised rates by 75 basis points on Nov. 2 for the fourth straight time as part of its most aggressive tightening since the 1980s to curb an inflation that started in the wake of the Covid-19 pandemic disruptions.Bullard didn’t say whether he would favor a 50 or 75 basis-point move at the Fed’s December meeting, telling reporters that he would look to Powell to set the direction.A number of his colleagues have called for a downshift in the size of the next rate increase following last week’s consumer price report, which showed a softening in core consumer goods inflation in October.Investors expect the Fed will raise rates by a half percentage point next month and see rates peaking around 5% next year.The St. Louis Fed president said he expected officials to keep rates high for an extended period to avoid the kind of monetary policy mistakes of the 1970s that resulted in persistently high inflation.“We certainly don’t want to replay that episode,” he told reporters. “So we’re going to have to see very tangible evidence that inflation’s coming down meaningfully toward target, and I think we’re going to want to err on the side of staying higher for longer in order to get that to happen.”Bullard said while he expected inflation to come down next year, there’s been relatively little evidence of that so far.“Thus far, the change in the monetary-policy stance appears to have had only limited effects on observed inflation, but market pricing suggests disinflation is expected in 2023,” Bullard said in his prepared remarks, adding rate hikes so far have caused little financial stress.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":33,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9963053364,"gmtCreate":1668557296359,"gmtModify":1676538074730,"author":{"id":"3569303342488537","authorId":"3569303342488537","name":"ColeHii","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":1},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👍","listText":"👍","text":"👍","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":13,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9963053364","repostId":"1160332041","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1160332041","pubTimestamp":1668576951,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1160332041?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-11-16 13:35","market":"us","language":"en","title":"What If the Fed’s Own Forecasts Are Wrong?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1160332041","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"The Federal Reserve’s summary of Economic Projections in September doesn’t anticipate a recession in","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>The Federal Reserve’s summary of Economic Projections in September doesn’t anticipate a recession in the next three years. And Chair Jerome Powell still seems to think that a soft landing for the economy is possible. In my view, however, a US recession is highly likely in the next 12 to 18 months. Why don’t I share the Fed’s optimism?</p><p>The projections by the Fed governors will always paint a rosy picture. They’re instructed to condition their view on an optimal monetary policy, which obviously makes better outcomes achievable. In the real world, as has been demonstrated over the past year, policy is often far from that ideal, so actual results will usually be worse than implied by the projections.</p><p>In the same vein, the Fed model that underpins its staff forecast contains assumptions that contribute to more pleasant forecasts. They include that the Fed will pursue the optimal monetary policy path in the future (regardless of past errors) and that households and businesses know this.</p><p>These assumptions rule out persistent monetary policy errors or the loss of confidence by households and businesses in the Fed’s commitment and ability to achieve its employment and inflation objectives.</p><p>The Fed also operates in a world where there’s an important political economy constraint. Admitting that a recession would be required to get inflation in check might undercut public support for a tighter monetary policy. It also could subject the Fed to criticism that might ultimately undermine its independence or cause Congress to limit its authority in the future. Sugarcoating the cost of what the Fed needs to do may be viewed as a necessary evil so it can carry out its mission successfully. But it also runs the risk of undercutting the Fed’s credibility.</p><p>Why do I believe a recession is unavoidable? To start, the Fed is committed to bringing inflation down to its 2% annual rate target. Powell made it clear in his remarks at the Jackson Hole conference in August that this goal was “unconditional” and reiterated his commitment at his September news conference. Failure is an unattractive option because inflation expectations would rise, necessitating a harsher monetary policy and worse outcomes later.</p><p>To bring inflation to 2%, the Federal Open Market Committee will have to push up the unemployment rate substantially. The labor market is much too tight to be consistent with a stable or declining underlying inflation rate.</p><p>Judging from the relationship between unfilled job openings and the number of people who are unemployed, known as the Beveridge curve, the unemployment rate consistent with stable inflation has risen considerably and could be as high as 5%, well above the current rate of 3.7%. Even if the Beveridge curve were to shift back down because labor market frictions abated, the unemployment rate would still need to rise to at least 4.5%.</p><p>During the postwar period, every time the unemployment rate has risen by 0.5 percentage point or more, the US economy has fallen into recession. This empirical regularity is memorialized as the Sahm rule. The difficulty of engineering a soft landing is underscored by the fact that there are no examples of an unemployment rate rising between 0.5 and 2 percentage points from trough to peak at all. Once the unemployment rate has moved up modestly, it’s hard to stop. Thus, the Fed’s Summary of Economic Projections in September in which unemployment rises to 4.4% from its recent trough of 3.5% would be unprecedented.</p><p>The episodes Powell has cited of successful soft landings—in 1965-66, 1984-85, and 1993-95—don’t apply to the current set of circumstances. In those cases, the Fed tightened and that slowed the pace of economic growth and the decline in the unemployment rate, but in none of those episodes did the Fed tighten sufficiently to push the unemployment rate up. In Fed parlance, these soft landings were achieved from above, by slowing the economy to a sustainable growth rate, rather than from below, by slowing the economy sufficiently to push the unemployment rate up.</p><p>Fed risk management will also increase the likelihood of recession. Powell has made it clear that the consequences of failing to bring inflation back down to 2% on a sustainable basis are unacceptable. The lesson of the 1970s is that failure would lead to unanchored inflation expectations, making the job of restoring price stability that much more difficult.</p><p>In addition, the Fed’s task will be made difficult by uncertainty about whether it has done enough. How high do short-term interest rates need to go to push the unemployment rate above the rate consistent with stable inflation? How long does such an unemployment rate need to be elevated to bring inflation back down to 2%? Because, at the margin, the negative consequences of doing too little exceed the negative consequences of doing too much, this means that monetary policy will likely ultimately be kept too tight for too long. The long and variable lags between changes in the stance of monetary policy and its effect on economic activity reinforce this.</p><p>Some argue—including Fed officials—that a soft landing is still possible:</p><p>• As supply chain disruptions dissipate and the allocation of demand between goods and services normalizes, headline inflation will fall sharply.</p><p>• Labor supply will increase as labor force participation rises.</p><p>• Fed tightening can reduce the excess demand for labor without generating a large rise in unemployment.</p><p>Although one can’t dismiss these points out of hand, I’m afraid they’re likely to prove insufficient to avoid a hard landing.</p><p>First, even if declining goods prices cause headline inflation to fall sharply in the year ahead, that doesn’t deal with the fact that the inflation problem has broadened out, into services prices and wages.</p><p>The breadth of inflationary pressures is visible in the median consumer price index calculated by the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland and the trimmed mean personal consumption expenditures deflator—an alternative inflation measure calculated by the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas—with increases of 7% and 4.7%, respectively, over the past year. Those numbers capture what’s happening for those goods and services in the middle of the inflation distribution.</p><p>Similarly, the trend of wage inflation is well above a rate consistent with 2% inflation. For example, the employment cost index for the wages and salaries of private industry workers has gone up 5.2% over the past year, and the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta’s wage tracker index is rising at a 6.4% annual rate. Given the trend of labor productivity, wage inflation needs to be in a 3%-to-4% range to be consistent with the Fed’s 2% inflation objective.</p><p>Second, on the labor supply front, the Fed is unlikely to be bailed out by a large increase in labor force participation. As labor economist Stephanie Aaronson noted in her remarks at this year’s Fed Jackson Hole conference: “The unemployment rate is the best gauge of the state of the business cycle.” Although a tight labor market can be expected to provoke a rise in labor force participation, she said, the process is a slow-moving one, playing out over several years, too slow a process to rescue the Fed.</p><p>Third, the notion that the Fed’s monetary policy stringency can be oriented toward reducing the excess demand for labor without driving up unemployment materially is wishful thinking. Monetary policy can’t be targeted in such a way to reduce the demand for labor in industries where demand is excessive relative to industries where labor supply and demand is in better balance. It’s a blunt tool that affects the economy broadly through its impact on financial conditions.</p><p>Although a soft landing would obviously be preferable, that ship has sailed. Today, a recession is virtually inevitable.</p></body></html>","source":"lsy1584095487587","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>What If the Fed’s Own Forecasts Are Wrong?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhat If the Fed’s Own Forecasts Are Wrong?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-11-16 13:35 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-11-15/what-if-the-fed-s-own-forecasts-are-wrong?srnd=premium><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The Federal Reserve’s summary of Economic Projections in September doesn’t anticipate a recession in the next three years. And Chair Jerome Powell still seems to think that a soft landing for the ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-11-15/what-if-the-fed-s-own-forecasts-are-wrong?srnd=premium\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-11-15/what-if-the-fed-s-own-forecasts-are-wrong?srnd=premium","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1160332041","content_text":"The Federal Reserve’s summary of Economic Projections in September doesn’t anticipate a recession in the next three years. And Chair Jerome Powell still seems to think that a soft landing for the economy is possible. In my view, however, a US recession is highly likely in the next 12 to 18 months. Why don’t I share the Fed’s optimism?The projections by the Fed governors will always paint a rosy picture. They’re instructed to condition their view on an optimal monetary policy, which obviously makes better outcomes achievable. In the real world, as has been demonstrated over the past year, policy is often far from that ideal, so actual results will usually be worse than implied by the projections.In the same vein, the Fed model that underpins its staff forecast contains assumptions that contribute to more pleasant forecasts. They include that the Fed will pursue the optimal monetary policy path in the future (regardless of past errors) and that households and businesses know this.These assumptions rule out persistent monetary policy errors or the loss of confidence by households and businesses in the Fed’s commitment and ability to achieve its employment and inflation objectives.The Fed also operates in a world where there’s an important political economy constraint. Admitting that a recession would be required to get inflation in check might undercut public support for a tighter monetary policy. It also could subject the Fed to criticism that might ultimately undermine its independence or cause Congress to limit its authority in the future. Sugarcoating the cost of what the Fed needs to do may be viewed as a necessary evil so it can carry out its mission successfully. But it also runs the risk of undercutting the Fed’s credibility.Why do I believe a recession is unavoidable? To start, the Fed is committed to bringing inflation down to its 2% annual rate target. Powell made it clear in his remarks at the Jackson Hole conference in August that this goal was “unconditional” and reiterated his commitment at his September news conference. Failure is an unattractive option because inflation expectations would rise, necessitating a harsher monetary policy and worse outcomes later.To bring inflation to 2%, the Federal Open Market Committee will have to push up the unemployment rate substantially. The labor market is much too tight to be consistent with a stable or declining underlying inflation rate.Judging from the relationship between unfilled job openings and the number of people who are unemployed, known as the Beveridge curve, the unemployment rate consistent with stable inflation has risen considerably and could be as high as 5%, well above the current rate of 3.7%. Even if the Beveridge curve were to shift back down because labor market frictions abated, the unemployment rate would still need to rise to at least 4.5%.During the postwar period, every time the unemployment rate has risen by 0.5 percentage point or more, the US economy has fallen into recession. This empirical regularity is memorialized as the Sahm rule. The difficulty of engineering a soft landing is underscored by the fact that there are no examples of an unemployment rate rising between 0.5 and 2 percentage points from trough to peak at all. Once the unemployment rate has moved up modestly, it’s hard to stop. Thus, the Fed’s Summary of Economic Projections in September in which unemployment rises to 4.4% from its recent trough of 3.5% would be unprecedented.The episodes Powell has cited of successful soft landings—in 1965-66, 1984-85, and 1993-95—don’t apply to the current set of circumstances. In those cases, the Fed tightened and that slowed the pace of economic growth and the decline in the unemployment rate, but in none of those episodes did the Fed tighten sufficiently to push the unemployment rate up. In Fed parlance, these soft landings were achieved from above, by slowing the economy to a sustainable growth rate, rather than from below, by slowing the economy sufficiently to push the unemployment rate up.Fed risk management will also increase the likelihood of recession. Powell has made it clear that the consequences of failing to bring inflation back down to 2% on a sustainable basis are unacceptable. The lesson of the 1970s is that failure would lead to unanchored inflation expectations, making the job of restoring price stability that much more difficult.In addition, the Fed’s task will be made difficult by uncertainty about whether it has done enough. How high do short-term interest rates need to go to push the unemployment rate above the rate consistent with stable inflation? How long does such an unemployment rate need to be elevated to bring inflation back down to 2%? Because, at the margin, the negative consequences of doing too little exceed the negative consequences of doing too much, this means that monetary policy will likely ultimately be kept too tight for too long. The long and variable lags between changes in the stance of monetary policy and its effect on economic activity reinforce this.Some argue—including Fed officials—that a soft landing is still possible:• As supply chain disruptions dissipate and the allocation of demand between goods and services normalizes, headline inflation will fall sharply.• Labor supply will increase as labor force participation rises.• Fed tightening can reduce the excess demand for labor without generating a large rise in unemployment.Although one can’t dismiss these points out of hand, I’m afraid they’re likely to prove insufficient to avoid a hard landing.First, even if declining goods prices cause headline inflation to fall sharply in the year ahead, that doesn’t deal with the fact that the inflation problem has broadened out, into services prices and wages.The breadth of inflationary pressures is visible in the median consumer price index calculated by the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland and the trimmed mean personal consumption expenditures deflator—an alternative inflation measure calculated by the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas—with increases of 7% and 4.7%, respectively, over the past year. Those numbers capture what’s happening for those goods and services in the middle of the inflation distribution.Similarly, the trend of wage inflation is well above a rate consistent with 2% inflation. For example, the employment cost index for the wages and salaries of private industry workers has gone up 5.2% over the past year, and the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta’s wage tracker index is rising at a 6.4% annual rate. Given the trend of labor productivity, wage inflation needs to be in a 3%-to-4% range to be consistent with the Fed’s 2% inflation objective.Second, on the labor supply front, the Fed is unlikely to be bailed out by a large increase in labor force participation. As labor economist Stephanie Aaronson noted in her remarks at this year’s Fed Jackson Hole conference: “The unemployment rate is the best gauge of the state of the business cycle.” Although a tight labor market can be expected to provoke a rise in labor force participation, she said, the process is a slow-moving one, playing out over several years, too slow a process to rescue the Fed.Third, the notion that the Fed’s monetary policy stringency can be oriented toward reducing the excess demand for labor without driving up unemployment materially is wishful thinking. Monetary policy can’t be targeted in such a way to reduce the demand for labor in industries where demand is excessive relative to industries where labor supply and demand is in better balance. It’s a blunt tool that affects the economy broadly through its impact on financial conditions.Although a soft landing would obviously be preferable, that ship has sailed. Today, a recession is virtually inevitable.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":88,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9927388349,"gmtCreate":1672399202881,"gmtModify":1676538685246,"author":{"id":"3569303342488537","authorId":"3569303342488537","name":"ColeHii","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":1},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👍","listText":"👍","text":"👍","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":14,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9927388349","repostId":"2295113789","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2295113789","pubTimestamp":1672394307,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2295113789?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-12-30 17:58","market":"us","language":"en","title":"2 No-Brainer Warren Buffett Stocks to Buy Hand Over Fist for 2023","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2295113789","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Amazon and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing are available at attractive valuations.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>The Federal Reserve gave the stock market a shock recently as the central bank raised interest rates once again, taking its benchmark rate to its highest level in 15 years. The Fed also suggested that it would keep raising rates in 2023 to bring down inflation.</p><p>The Fed&#39;s hawkish stance sent equities tumbling, as it was expected that the central bank would dial down rate increases in 2023 thanks to signs of cooling inflation. A high-interest-rate environment has been the stock market&#39;s undoing in 2022. The Fed would need more proof that inflation is cooling in a sustained manner.</p><p>It could get that evidence in 2023, as inflation is expected to drop to 3.2% by the end of 2023, which would be a substantial decline from 7.1% in November 2022. So it won&#39;t be surprising to see the Fed adopt a dovish stance as 2023 progresses. That&#39;s why now may be a good time to buy some beaten-down stocks from Warren Buffett&#39;s portfolio.</p><p>The <b>Berkshire Hathaway</b> CEO has been active in the stock market this year despite the gloom, suggesting that he&#39;s busy putting his money to work by buying solid companies for the long run. Here are two stocks from Berkshire&#39;s portfolio that investors may want to buy while they&#39;re still down, as they could turn out to be big winners in the long run.</p><h2>1. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMZN\">Amazon</a></h2><p>E-commerce and technology giant <b>Amazon</b> has lost half of its value on the stock market this year. The company&#39;s growth has lagged thanks to a slowdown in e-commerce sales on account of surging inflation.</p><p>But with inflation expected to cool down substantially in 2023, the e-commerce business can be expected to step on the gas once again. This explains why Amazon&#39;s earnings are estimated to jump substantially next year following a sharp drop in 2022. More specifically, Amazon is expected to finish 2022 with a loss of $0.09 per share, compared with a profit of $3.24 per share in 2021, but the forecast for 2023 and 2024 shows major improvements are in the cards.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7ef8b659184ae00c4a96f8c33905911b\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"387\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>AMZN EPS Estimates for Current Fiscal Year data by YCharts</p><p>It is estimated that global e-commerce spending could rise to $6.5 trillion in 2023 from $5.7 trillion in 2022. That would be a nice improvement over this year&#39;s estimated decline of nearly 10%. On the other hand, Amazon&#39;s entry into a lucrative market such as advertising should be another key catalyst for the company in 2023.</p><p>Amazon&#39;s advertising revenue jumped 25% year over year in the third quarter of 2022 to $9.5 billion. Although that was less than 10% of the company&#39;s total revenue of $127 billion, it could move the needle in a bigger way for the company. Amazon&#39;s 2022 ad revenue is expected to land at $38 billion. By 2026, this figure is expected to jump to $64 billion. Throw in other growth drivers such as cloud computing, an area where Amazon dominates, and it is easy to see why the company is expected to clock 26% annual earnings growth for the next five years.</p><p>So this Warren Buffett stock could run higher in 2023 and beyond, which is why investors may want to buy it right now, as it&#39;s trading at just 1.7 times sales, which represents a discount to the <b>S&amp;P 500</b>&#39;s price-to-sales ratio of 2.3.</p><h2>2. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSM\">Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing</a></h2><p><b>Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing</b> -- better known as TSMC -- is one of the latest additions to Buffett&#39;s portfolio. The Oracle of Omaha revealed a $4.1 billion stake in TSMC recently, and it&#39;s not surprising to see why the foundry giant has made its way into Berkshire&#39;s portfolio.</p><p>TSMC&#39;s 43% slide in 2022 means it&#39;s available at an attractive valuation. TSMC is trading at less than 14 times trailing earnings. That&#39;s lower than the S&amp;P 500&#39;s earnings multiple of 18. Buying this semiconductor stock at this valuation looks like a no-brainer, given the terrific growth opportunity it&#39;s sitting on.</p><p>With TSMC&#39;s earnings estimated to increase at an annual pace of over 21% over the next five years, investors can consider buying it hand over fist considering the cheap valuation. After all, TSMC is the world&#39;s biggest semiconductor foundry and controls 56% share of this space, according to Counterpoint Research.</p><p>This impressive market share puts the company in a solid position to take advantage of the secular growth in semiconductors. Global semiconductor sales are estimated to exceed $1 trillion in annual revenue by 2030, up from $600 billion in 2021. Of course, analysts expect the industry to hit a speed bump in 2023, with industry revenue expected to decline 3.6%, but TSMC can sustain its impressive growth despite that.</p><p>TSMC&#39;s revenue has jumped nearly 45% in the first 11 months of 2022 compared with the prior-year period. That&#39;s well above the 4% growth that the global semiconductor market is expected to reach in 2022. TSMC&#39;s diversified end markets and its dominance of the foundry market have allowed it to enjoy terrific growth in 2022, and the company&#39;s investments in advanced technologies should help it sustain the same in the future thanks to its secular growth opportunity.</p><p>All this makes TSMC another top Buffett stock that investors may want to buy right now, as it may not be available for cheap once inflation cools down enough and the stock market possibly goes on a bull run in 2023.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>2 No-Brainer Warren Buffett Stocks to Buy Hand Over Fist for 2023</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n2 No-Brainer Warren Buffett Stocks to Buy Hand Over Fist for 2023\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-12-30 17:58 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/12/29/2-no-brainer-warren-buffett-stocks-to-buy-hand-ove/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The Federal Reserve gave the stock market a shock recently as the central bank raised interest rates once again, taking its benchmark rate to its highest level in 15 years. The Fed also suggested that...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/12/29/2-no-brainer-warren-buffett-stocks-to-buy-hand-ove/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AMZN":"亚马逊","TSM":"台积电"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/12/29/2-no-brainer-warren-buffett-stocks-to-buy-hand-ove/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2295113789","content_text":"The Federal Reserve gave the stock market a shock recently as the central bank raised interest rates once again, taking its benchmark rate to its highest level in 15 years. The Fed also suggested that it would keep raising rates in 2023 to bring down inflation.The Fed's hawkish stance sent equities tumbling, as it was expected that the central bank would dial down rate increases in 2023 thanks to signs of cooling inflation. A high-interest-rate environment has been the stock market's undoing in 2022. The Fed would need more proof that inflation is cooling in a sustained manner.It could get that evidence in 2023, as inflation is expected to drop to 3.2% by the end of 2023, which would be a substantial decline from 7.1% in November 2022. So it won't be surprising to see the Fed adopt a dovish stance as 2023 progresses. That's why now may be a good time to buy some beaten-down stocks from Warren Buffett's portfolio.The Berkshire Hathaway CEO has been active in the stock market this year despite the gloom, suggesting that he's busy putting his money to work by buying solid companies for the long run. Here are two stocks from Berkshire's portfolio that investors may want to buy while they're still down, as they could turn out to be big winners in the long run.1. AmazonE-commerce and technology giant Amazon has lost half of its value on the stock market this year. The company's growth has lagged thanks to a slowdown in e-commerce sales on account of surging inflation.But with inflation expected to cool down substantially in 2023, the e-commerce business can be expected to step on the gas once again. This explains why Amazon's earnings are estimated to jump substantially next year following a sharp drop in 2022. More specifically, Amazon is expected to finish 2022 with a loss of $0.09 per share, compared with a profit of $3.24 per share in 2021, but the forecast for 2023 and 2024 shows major improvements are in the cards.AMZN EPS Estimates for Current Fiscal Year data by YChartsIt is estimated that global e-commerce spending could rise to $6.5 trillion in 2023 from $5.7 trillion in 2022. That would be a nice improvement over this year's estimated decline of nearly 10%. On the other hand, Amazon's entry into a lucrative market such as advertising should be another key catalyst for the company in 2023.Amazon's advertising revenue jumped 25% year over year in the third quarter of 2022 to $9.5 billion. Although that was less than 10% of the company's total revenue of $127 billion, it could move the needle in a bigger way for the company. Amazon's 2022 ad revenue is expected to land at $38 billion. By 2026, this figure is expected to jump to $64 billion. Throw in other growth drivers such as cloud computing, an area where Amazon dominates, and it is easy to see why the company is expected to clock 26% annual earnings growth for the next five years.So this Warren Buffett stock could run higher in 2023 and beyond, which is why investors may want to buy it right now, as it's trading at just 1.7 times sales, which represents a discount to the S&P 500's price-to-sales ratio of 2.3.2. Taiwan Semiconductor ManufacturingTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing -- better known as TSMC -- is one of the latest additions to Buffett's portfolio. The Oracle of Omaha revealed a $4.1 billion stake in TSMC recently, and it's not surprising to see why the foundry giant has made its way into Berkshire's portfolio.TSMC's 43% slide in 2022 means it's available at an attractive valuation. TSMC is trading at less than 14 times trailing earnings. That's lower than the S&P 500's earnings multiple of 18. Buying this semiconductor stock at this valuation looks like a no-brainer, given the terrific growth opportunity it's sitting on.With TSMC's earnings estimated to increase at an annual pace of over 21% over the next five years, investors can consider buying it hand over fist considering the cheap valuation. After all, TSMC is the world's biggest semiconductor foundry and controls 56% share of this space, according to Counterpoint Research.This impressive market share puts the company in a solid position to take advantage of the secular growth in semiconductors. Global semiconductor sales are estimated to exceed $1 trillion in annual revenue by 2030, up from $600 billion in 2021. Of course, analysts expect the industry to hit a speed bump in 2023, with industry revenue expected to decline 3.6%, but TSMC can sustain its impressive growth despite that.TSMC's revenue has jumped nearly 45% in the first 11 months of 2022 compared with the prior-year period. That's well above the 4% growth that the global semiconductor market is expected to reach in 2022. TSMC's diversified end markets and its dominance of the foundry market have allowed it to enjoy terrific growth in 2022, and the company's investments in advanced technologies should help it sustain the same in the future thanks to its secular growth opportunity.All this makes TSMC another top Buffett stock that investors may want to buy right now, as it may not be available for cheap once inflation cools down enough and the stock market possibly goes on a bull run in 2023.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":143,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":813341077,"gmtCreate":1630138358199,"gmtModify":1676530233765,"author":{"id":"3569303342488537","authorId":"3569303342488537","name":"ColeHii","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":1},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Wow!","listText":"Wow!","text":"Wow!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":12,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/813341077","repostId":"2162733980","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":8,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9949908039,"gmtCreate":1678279284622,"gmtModify":1678279287831,"author":{"id":"3569303342488537","authorId":"3569303342488537","name":"ColeHii","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":1},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👍","listText":"👍","text":"👍","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":15,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9949908039","repostId":"1109123037","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1109123037","pubTimestamp":1678289407,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1109123037?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2023-03-08 23:30","market":"us","language":"en","title":"3 Stocks to Buy That Could Be the Next Trillion-Dollar Company","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1109123037","media":"InvestorPlace","summary":"What will be the next trillion-dollar company? A few companies jump out on the list.Nvidia(NVDA) nea","content":"<html><head></head><body><ul><li>What will be the next trillion-dollar company? A few companies jump out on the list.</li><li><b>Nvidia</b>(NVDA) neared this mark during the peak of the last cycle and thanks to its positioning in new market trends, will likely get there on the next bull cycle.</li><li><b>Tesla</b>(TSLA) was in the trillion-dollar club once before and can likely get there again.</li><li><b>Berkshire Hathaway</b>(<b><u>BRK.B</u></b>, <b><u>BRK.A</u></b>) is the slow-and-steady pick and it’s that far away now, currently commanding a $700 billion valuation.</li></ul><p>The bear market has been punishing for stocks, crushing hopes and dolling out major losses. While many companies have held up okay, others continue to struggle. It makes investors wonder when we’ll see the next trillion-dollar company.</p><p>It wasn’t that long ago that a trillion-dollar market capitalization seemed unreachable. But before long, <b>Apple</b>(NASDAQ: <b>AAPL</b>) grazed a $3 trillion market cap. Then the whole market went south and the bear market really began to growl.</p><p>In any regard, the steep decline has many investors wondering what the next trillion-dollar company is and when we’ll see it.</p><p>There’s no way to know for sure — particularly on the “when” part of the equation — but here are the stocks that seem most likely to get there.</p><p><b>Nvidia (NVDA)</b></p><p><b>Nvidia</b>(NASDAQ: <b>NVDA</b>) was not all that far away from a $1 trillion market cap. At one point in December 2021, the company had a valuation north of $800 billion. It would have taken about a 20% rally for Nvidia to get there in the prior cycle.</p><p>While the stock went on to lose two-thirds of its value from peak to trough, it’s been on a robust rally since. Shares have rallied more than 100% off the recent low as investors continue to pile in.</p><p>Part of it seems like momentum driving the action, while some of it feels like “FOMO,” as investors fear missing out on the “next big stock” and the AI revolution, which Nvidia is helping to drive.</p><p>Because of its role in current technology, the company should continue to do quite well. The way CEO Jensen Huang positions the company in future technology trends <i>before</i> they become hot is why Nvidia has the potential to be one of the next trillion-dollar companies.</p><p><b>Tesla (TSLA)</b></p><p><b>Tesla</b>(NASDAQ: <b>TSLA</b>) is an easy and obvious name when looking for the next trillion-dollar company. Tesla should be on everyone’s list for the potential to hit this milestone, given that it has already done so before.</p><p>In 2021, Tesla sported a market cap north of $1.2 trillion. As recently as mid-September, shares were down just 24% from the all-time high. Then things came to an abrupt halt.</p><p>CEO Elon Musk bought Twitter, which only fueled Tesla’s decline as shares fell in five straight months and cratered more than 67% from the August high to the January low. When it finally bottomed near $100, Tesla stock was 75% below its all-time high.</p><p>Should it ever get there again — currently at $414.50 — it will represent a gain of just over 300% from the low.</p><p>While a global recession is the obvious risk, the company’s automotive and energy components continue to drive growth. For example, analysts expect 27% and 31% growth in 2023 and 2024, respectively.</p><p><b>Berkshire Hathaway (BRK-B, BRK-A)</b></p><p>Last but not least, we have <b>Berkshire Hathaway</b>(NYSE: <b><u>BRK-A</u></b>, NYSE: <b><u>BRK-B</u></b>). However, there’re two main risks with this pick as the next trillion-dollar company. That are Warren Buffett and Charlie Munger.</p><p>While those two money managers may be the firm’s biggest assets, there are worries that when they are gone, they will turn into Berkshire’s biggest liabilities.</p><p>However, Buffett and Munger have built Berkshire into a powerhouse, as it has amassed a $700 billion market cap. At its highs, it sported a market cap of $800 billion. I believe Buffett &amp; Co. have built a system that will allow Berkshire to continue flourishing long after they have stepped down.</p><p>That goes for Berkshire’s impressive list of portfolio managers, but also for the company’s impressive investments. As the world continues to push forward, so too will Berkshire’s largest positions (and savvy deals) and eventually, that should tip the company into the trillion-dollar club.</p></body></html>","source":"investorplace","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>3 Stocks to Buy That Could Be the Next Trillion-Dollar Company</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n3 Stocks to Buy That Could Be the Next Trillion-Dollar Company\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2023-03-08 23:30 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://investorplace.com/2023/03/3-stocks-to-buy-that-could-be-the-next-trillion-dollar-company/><strong>InvestorPlace</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>What will be the next trillion-dollar company? A few companies jump out on the list.Nvidia(NVDA) neared this mark during the peak of the last cycle and thanks to its positioning in new market trends, ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://investorplace.com/2023/03/3-stocks-to-buy-that-could-be-the-next-trillion-dollar-company/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉","NVDA":"英伟达","BRK.B":"伯克希尔B","BRK.A":"伯克希尔"},"source_url":"https://investorplace.com/2023/03/3-stocks-to-buy-that-could-be-the-next-trillion-dollar-company/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1109123037","content_text":"What will be the next trillion-dollar company? A few companies jump out on the list.Nvidia(NVDA) neared this mark during the peak of the last cycle and thanks to its positioning in new market trends, will likely get there on the next bull cycle.Tesla(TSLA) was in the trillion-dollar club once before and can likely get there again.Berkshire Hathaway(BRK.B, BRK.A) is the slow-and-steady pick and it’s that far away now, currently commanding a $700 billion valuation.The bear market has been punishing for stocks, crushing hopes and dolling out major losses. While many companies have held up okay, others continue to struggle. It makes investors wonder when we’ll see the next trillion-dollar company.It wasn’t that long ago that a trillion-dollar market capitalization seemed unreachable. But before long, Apple(NASDAQ: AAPL) grazed a $3 trillion market cap. Then the whole market went south and the bear market really began to growl.In any regard, the steep decline has many investors wondering what the next trillion-dollar company is and when we’ll see it.There’s no way to know for sure — particularly on the “when” part of the equation — but here are the stocks that seem most likely to get there.Nvidia (NVDA)Nvidia(NASDAQ: NVDA) was not all that far away from a $1 trillion market cap. At one point in December 2021, the company had a valuation north of $800 billion. It would have taken about a 20% rally for Nvidia to get there in the prior cycle.While the stock went on to lose two-thirds of its value from peak to trough, it’s been on a robust rally since. Shares have rallied more than 100% off the recent low as investors continue to pile in.Part of it seems like momentum driving the action, while some of it feels like “FOMO,” as investors fear missing out on the “next big stock” and the AI revolution, which Nvidia is helping to drive.Because of its role in current technology, the company should continue to do quite well. The way CEO Jensen Huang positions the company in future technology trends before they become hot is why Nvidia has the potential to be one of the next trillion-dollar companies.Tesla (TSLA)Tesla(NASDAQ: TSLA) is an easy and obvious name when looking for the next trillion-dollar company. Tesla should be on everyone’s list for the potential to hit this milestone, given that it has already done so before.In 2021, Tesla sported a market cap north of $1.2 trillion. As recently as mid-September, shares were down just 24% from the all-time high. Then things came to an abrupt halt.CEO Elon Musk bought Twitter, which only fueled Tesla’s decline as shares fell in five straight months and cratered more than 67% from the August high to the January low. When it finally bottomed near $100, Tesla stock was 75% below its all-time high.Should it ever get there again — currently at $414.50 — it will represent a gain of just over 300% from the low.While a global recession is the obvious risk, the company’s automotive and energy components continue to drive growth. For example, analysts expect 27% and 31% growth in 2023 and 2024, respectively.Berkshire Hathaway (BRK-B, BRK-A)Last but not least, we have Berkshire Hathaway(NYSE: BRK-A, NYSE: BRK-B). However, there’re two main risks with this pick as the next trillion-dollar company. That are Warren Buffett and Charlie Munger.While those two money managers may be the firm’s biggest assets, there are worries that when they are gone, they will turn into Berkshire’s biggest liabilities.However, Buffett and Munger have built Berkshire into a powerhouse, as it has amassed a $700 billion market cap. At its highs, it sported a market cap of $800 billion. I believe Buffett & Co. have built a system that will allow Berkshire to continue flourishing long after they have stepped down.That goes for Berkshire’s impressive list of portfolio managers, but also for the company’s impressive investments. As the world continues to push forward, so too will Berkshire’s largest positions (and savvy deals) and eventually, that should tip the company into the trillion-dollar club.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":118,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9953380890,"gmtCreate":1673156581110,"gmtModify":1676538793448,"author":{"id":"3569303342488537","authorId":"3569303342488537","name":"ColeHii","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":1},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👍","listText":"👍","text":"👍","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":14,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9953380890","repostId":"2301475181","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2301475181","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1673140820,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2301475181?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2023-01-08 09:20","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Earnings Season Will Test the Market’s Great Start","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2301475181","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"Investors got their Goldilocks jobs report on Friday morning, with a growing-but-slowing labor marke","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Investors got their Goldilocks jobs report on Friday morning, with a growing-but-slowing labor market, a tick-up in participation, and a deceleration in the pace of wage gains.</p><p>It was the kind of release that makes an oft-wished-for soft landing seem almost possible.</p><p>If job growth can continue without fueling a wage-price spiral, then perhaps it won&#39;t take a recession to break the back of inflation, especially as increases in commodities and goods prices continue to reverse. The Federal Reserve could declare victory in its inflation fight and ease off its monetary policy tightening sooner rather than later in 2023, setting off rallies across asset classes.</p><p>So goes the bullish thinking.</p><p>That narrative was on display this past Friday when stock indexes surged to end a choppy holiday-shortened week higher. The S&amp;P 500 finished the week up 1.45%, the Dow Jones Industrial Average added 1.46%, and the Nasdaq Composite ticked up 0.98%.</p><p>If all that sounds familiar, it should. The Fed has stated that it plans to increase interest rates in early 2023, then hold there for some time. Federal-funds futures pricing, however, implies a peak in rates by the spring, then cuts in the back half of 2023. It&#39;s another sign that investors expect the Fed to change its tune. They hope Friday&#39;s jobs report sent the Fed a message -- its job is almost done.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d8d660bff719b54ee732ddb0da0da2f9\" tg-width=\"955\" tg-height=\"636\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>One data point, however, won&#39;t be enough to change the Fed&#39;s mind. The market will be looking to December&#39;s consumer price index this coming Thursday as its next macro bogey -- one that will provide additional fodder for the Fed&#39;s next policy meeting in February. The rate of inflation is expected to fall to 6.5% year over year from 7.1% in November.</p><p>But it&#39;s not just about the economic data. This coming Friday brings the start of fourth-quarter earnings season, with some major companies -- JPMorgan Chase (ticker: JPM), Bank of America (BAC), UnitedHealth Group (UNH), and Delta Air Lines (DAL) among them -- kicking off the festivities. The vast majority of the S&amp;P 500 will report over the following month and a half.</p><p>Few are expecting a good fourth quarter. In aggregate, S&amp;P 500 companies are expected to report their first losing quarter since 2020. Earnings per share are forecast to decline by 2.2% year over year, to $53.87, after roughly 4.4% growth in the third quarter and 8.4% in the second quarter, per IBES data from Refinitiv. The consensus fourth-quarter outlook became much gloomier as 2022 proceeded -- at the start of last year, analysts had penciled in 14.1% year-over-year earnings growth for the period.</p><p>Analysts&#39; current estimate would bring 2022 S&amp;P 500 EPS to $219.80, which would be up 5.6% for the year. It&#39;s likely to end up a bit better than that, as most companies tend to beat consensus estimates. Revenue, though, is forecast to rise 4.1% year over year in the fourth quarter, to $3.7 trillion, and 11.2% for all of 2022, to $13.8 trillion. The fact that sales are rising but earnings are falling is a sign that corporate profit margins appear to have peaked for this cycle.</p><p>The earnings slump won&#39;t hit all companies equally. The energy and industrial sectors are expected to be outliers, delivering EPS growth of 65% and 43%, respectively, from a year earlier. Those are among the cyclically sensitive companies that suffered the most during the Covid-19 recession and are still enjoying the rebound.</p><p>On the opposite end of the spectrum are materials, where earnings are forecast to drop by 22% as prices of many industrial inputs have returned to earth; communication services, down 21% due to an expected drop in advertising spending and continued streaming losses at many media companies; and consumer discretionary, down 15% on potentially weaker spending in 2023. Tech, which makes up close to a quarter of the S&amp;P 500&#39;s EPS, is expected to show a 9% decline in earnings in the fourth quarter as wage costs balloon at many software companies, enterprise demand slows, and semiconductors remain in a downturn. Expectations are so low that the fourth-quarter results could be strong relative to forecasts.</p><p>But those beats might not matter if companies can&#39;t provide at least a decent outlook for 2023.</p><p>The bottom-up consensus -- gleaned by summing the average earnings estimates from all individual stock and sector analysts for each of the companies in the S&amp;P 500 -- is for EPS to grow by 4.4% to $229.52 in 2023, according to Refinitiv, up from about $220 in 2022. Conversely, the top-down view of Wall Street strategists surveyed by Barron&#39;s in December calls for a 2.7% decline in S&amp;P 500 profits in 2023 to an average of $214 per share.</p><p>The difference is in the profit margins. Strategists see them getting squeezed by rising wages and higher interest costs, even as the prices they charge customers moderate. That&#39;s largely in line with the Fed&#39;s view that some elements of inflation are sticky and will take time -- and economic pain -- to bring down. If that scenario plays out, the shift lower in earnings expectations would make the market appear pricier even as the Fed continues to increase interest rates.</p><p>Needless to say, that&#39;s not a winning combination for stocks -- no matter what the jobs report said.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Earnings Season Will Test the Market’s Great Start</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nEarnings Season Will Test the Market’s Great Start\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2023-01-08 09:20</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>Investors got their Goldilocks jobs report on Friday morning, with a growing-but-slowing labor market, a tick-up in participation, and a deceleration in the pace of wage gains.</p><p>It was the kind of release that makes an oft-wished-for soft landing seem almost possible.</p><p>If job growth can continue without fueling a wage-price spiral, then perhaps it won&#39;t take a recession to break the back of inflation, especially as increases in commodities and goods prices continue to reverse. The Federal Reserve could declare victory in its inflation fight and ease off its monetary policy tightening sooner rather than later in 2023, setting off rallies across asset classes.</p><p>So goes the bullish thinking.</p><p>That narrative was on display this past Friday when stock indexes surged to end a choppy holiday-shortened week higher. The S&amp;P 500 finished the week up 1.45%, the Dow Jones Industrial Average added 1.46%, and the Nasdaq Composite ticked up 0.98%.</p><p>If all that sounds familiar, it should. The Fed has stated that it plans to increase interest rates in early 2023, then hold there for some time. Federal-funds futures pricing, however, implies a peak in rates by the spring, then cuts in the back half of 2023. It&#39;s another sign that investors expect the Fed to change its tune. They hope Friday&#39;s jobs report sent the Fed a message -- its job is almost done.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d8d660bff719b54ee732ddb0da0da2f9\" tg-width=\"955\" tg-height=\"636\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>One data point, however, won&#39;t be enough to change the Fed&#39;s mind. The market will be looking to December&#39;s consumer price index this coming Thursday as its next macro bogey -- one that will provide additional fodder for the Fed&#39;s next policy meeting in February. The rate of inflation is expected to fall to 6.5% year over year from 7.1% in November.</p><p>But it&#39;s not just about the economic data. This coming Friday brings the start of fourth-quarter earnings season, with some major companies -- JPMorgan Chase (ticker: JPM), Bank of America (BAC), UnitedHealth Group (UNH), and Delta Air Lines (DAL) among them -- kicking off the festivities. The vast majority of the S&amp;P 500 will report over the following month and a half.</p><p>Few are expecting a good fourth quarter. In aggregate, S&amp;P 500 companies are expected to report their first losing quarter since 2020. Earnings per share are forecast to decline by 2.2% year over year, to $53.87, after roughly 4.4% growth in the third quarter and 8.4% in the second quarter, per IBES data from Refinitiv. The consensus fourth-quarter outlook became much gloomier as 2022 proceeded -- at the start of last year, analysts had penciled in 14.1% year-over-year earnings growth for the period.</p><p>Analysts&#39; current estimate would bring 2022 S&amp;P 500 EPS to $219.80, which would be up 5.6% for the year. It&#39;s likely to end up a bit better than that, as most companies tend to beat consensus estimates. Revenue, though, is forecast to rise 4.1% year over year in the fourth quarter, to $3.7 trillion, and 11.2% for all of 2022, to $13.8 trillion. The fact that sales are rising but earnings are falling is a sign that corporate profit margins appear to have peaked for this cycle.</p><p>The earnings slump won&#39;t hit all companies equally. The energy and industrial sectors are expected to be outliers, delivering EPS growth of 65% and 43%, respectively, from a year earlier. Those are among the cyclically sensitive companies that suffered the most during the Covid-19 recession and are still enjoying the rebound.</p><p>On the opposite end of the spectrum are materials, where earnings are forecast to drop by 22% as prices of many industrial inputs have returned to earth; communication services, down 21% due to an expected drop in advertising spending and continued streaming losses at many media companies; and consumer discretionary, down 15% on potentially weaker spending in 2023. Tech, which makes up close to a quarter of the S&amp;P 500&#39;s EPS, is expected to show a 9% decline in earnings in the fourth quarter as wage costs balloon at many software companies, enterprise demand slows, and semiconductors remain in a downturn. Expectations are so low that the fourth-quarter results could be strong relative to forecasts.</p><p>But those beats might not matter if companies can&#39;t provide at least a decent outlook for 2023.</p><p>The bottom-up consensus -- gleaned by summing the average earnings estimates from all individual stock and sector analysts for each of the companies in the S&amp;P 500 -- is for EPS to grow by 4.4% to $229.52 in 2023, according to Refinitiv, up from about $220 in 2022. Conversely, the top-down view of Wall Street strategists surveyed by Barron&#39;s in December calls for a 2.7% decline in S&amp;P 500 profits in 2023 to an average of $214 per share.</p><p>The difference is in the profit margins. Strategists see them getting squeezed by rising wages and higher interest costs, even as the prices they charge customers moderate. That&#39;s largely in line with the Fed&#39;s view that some elements of inflation are sticky and will take time -- and economic pain -- to bring down. If that scenario plays out, the shift lower in earnings expectations would make the market appear pricier even as the Fed continues to increase interest rates.</p><p>Needless to say, that&#39;s not a winning combination for stocks -- no matter what the jobs report said.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"JPM":"摩根大通","DAL":"达美航空",".DJI":"道琼斯","BAC":"美国银行",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite","UNH":"联合健康",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2301475181","content_text":"Investors got their Goldilocks jobs report on Friday morning, with a growing-but-slowing labor market, a tick-up in participation, and a deceleration in the pace of wage gains.It was the kind of release that makes an oft-wished-for soft landing seem almost possible.If job growth can continue without fueling a wage-price spiral, then perhaps it won't take a recession to break the back of inflation, especially as increases in commodities and goods prices continue to reverse. The Federal Reserve could declare victory in its inflation fight and ease off its monetary policy tightening sooner rather than later in 2023, setting off rallies across asset classes.So goes the bullish thinking.That narrative was on display this past Friday when stock indexes surged to end a choppy holiday-shortened week higher. The S&P 500 finished the week up 1.45%, the Dow Jones Industrial Average added 1.46%, and the Nasdaq Composite ticked up 0.98%.If all that sounds familiar, it should. The Fed has stated that it plans to increase interest rates in early 2023, then hold there for some time. Federal-funds futures pricing, however, implies a peak in rates by the spring, then cuts in the back half of 2023. It's another sign that investors expect the Fed to change its tune. They hope Friday's jobs report sent the Fed a message -- its job is almost done.One data point, however, won't be enough to change the Fed's mind. The market will be looking to December's consumer price index this coming Thursday as its next macro bogey -- one that will provide additional fodder for the Fed's next policy meeting in February. The rate of inflation is expected to fall to 6.5% year over year from 7.1% in November.But it's not just about the economic data. This coming Friday brings the start of fourth-quarter earnings season, with some major companies -- JPMorgan Chase (ticker: JPM), Bank of America (BAC), UnitedHealth Group (UNH), and Delta Air Lines (DAL) among them -- kicking off the festivities. The vast majority of the S&P 500 will report over the following month and a half.Few are expecting a good fourth quarter. In aggregate, S&P 500 companies are expected to report their first losing quarter since 2020. Earnings per share are forecast to decline by 2.2% year over year, to $53.87, after roughly 4.4% growth in the third quarter and 8.4% in the second quarter, per IBES data from Refinitiv. The consensus fourth-quarter outlook became much gloomier as 2022 proceeded -- at the start of last year, analysts had penciled in 14.1% year-over-year earnings growth for the period.Analysts' current estimate would bring 2022 S&P 500 EPS to $219.80, which would be up 5.6% for the year. It's likely to end up a bit better than that, as most companies tend to beat consensus estimates. Revenue, though, is forecast to rise 4.1% year over year in the fourth quarter, to $3.7 trillion, and 11.2% for all of 2022, to $13.8 trillion. The fact that sales are rising but earnings are falling is a sign that corporate profit margins appear to have peaked for this cycle.The earnings slump won't hit all companies equally. The energy and industrial sectors are expected to be outliers, delivering EPS growth of 65% and 43%, respectively, from a year earlier. Those are among the cyclically sensitive companies that suffered the most during the Covid-19 recession and are still enjoying the rebound.On the opposite end of the spectrum are materials, where earnings are forecast to drop by 22% as prices of many industrial inputs have returned to earth; communication services, down 21% due to an expected drop in advertising spending and continued streaming losses at many media companies; and consumer discretionary, down 15% on potentially weaker spending in 2023. Tech, which makes up close to a quarter of the S&P 500's EPS, is expected to show a 9% decline in earnings in the fourth quarter as wage costs balloon at many software companies, enterprise demand slows, and semiconductors remain in a downturn. Expectations are so low that the fourth-quarter results could be strong relative to forecasts.But those beats might not matter if companies can't provide at least a decent outlook for 2023.The bottom-up consensus -- gleaned by summing the average earnings estimates from all individual stock and sector analysts for each of the companies in the S&P 500 -- is for EPS to grow by 4.4% to $229.52 in 2023, according to Refinitiv, up from about $220 in 2022. Conversely, the top-down view of Wall Street strategists surveyed by Barron's in December calls for a 2.7% decline in S&P 500 profits in 2023 to an average of $214 per share.The difference is in the profit margins. Strategists see them getting squeezed by rising wages and higher interest costs, even as the prices they charge customers moderate. That's largely in line with the Fed's view that some elements of inflation are sticky and will take time -- and economic pain -- to bring down. If that scenario plays out, the shift lower in earnings expectations would make the market appear pricier even as the Fed continues to increase interest rates.Needless to say, that's not a winning combination for stocks -- no matter what the jobs report said.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":257,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9924543617,"gmtCreate":1672292244839,"gmtModify":1676538667237,"author":{"id":"3569303342488537","authorId":"3569303342488537","name":"ColeHii","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":1},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👍","listText":"👍","text":"👍","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":14,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9924543617","repostId":"1183312159","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1183312159","pubTimestamp":1672282689,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1183312159?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-12-29 10:58","market":"us","language":"en","title":"2023 U.S. Stock Market Predictions: What Will Happen?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1183312159","media":"TipRanks","summary":"Story Highlights2022 was bad for stocks; we are entering the new year with a high level of uncertain","content":"<div>\n<p>Story Highlights2022 was bad for stocks; we are entering the new year with a high level of uncertainty. Investors should consider preparing their portfolios for different scenarios, differentiating ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.tipranks.com/news/article/2023-stock-market-predictions-what-will-happen\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"lsy1606183248679","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>2023 U.S. Stock Market Predictions: What Will Happen?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n2023 U.S. Stock Market Predictions: What Will Happen?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-12-29 10:58 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.tipranks.com/news/article/2023-stock-market-predictions-what-will-happen><strong>TipRanks</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Story Highlights2022 was bad for stocks; we are entering the new year with a high level of uncertainty. Investors should consider preparing their portfolios for different scenarios, differentiating ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.tipranks.com/news/article/2023-stock-market-predictions-what-will-happen\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".DJI":"道琼斯",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index"},"source_url":"https://www.tipranks.com/news/article/2023-stock-market-predictions-what-will-happen","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1183312159","content_text":"Story Highlights2022 was bad for stocks; we are entering the new year with a high level of uncertainty. Investors should consider preparing their portfolios for different scenarios, differentiating their holdings across segments that could maximize their returns against downside and upside factors.2022 will go down in history as one of the worst years for stocks in the last few decades; what will 2023 bring to the markets?Price history of the S&P 500 (SPX) IndexWhich Scenario Looks Right to You?It’s impossible to forecast the near-term path of the markets, but we can try and distinguish trends and upside and downside risks to these trends:Base Case: a mild recession in the first half of 2023, which brings down inflation, letting the Fed ease in the second half; the S&P 500 (SPX) rallies 10%-20%.Bear Case: the Fed over-tightens, sending the economy into a “hard landing,” sending stocks down for the year.Bull Case: the Fed succeeds in bringing down inflation without causing a recession, and stocks rally as they did in 2021.It would be reasonable to work according to the base-case outlook while hedging against different scenarios that might affect some stocks more than others.Base Case: Mild Recession Followed by an UpturnIn the base-case scenario, it would be a no-brainer to buy tech stocks. The decades-long trend of technology entering every layer of human life will continue, and tech stocks will likely shine again.According to Morningstar (NASDAQ: MORN) analysts, large-cap growth stocks are now one of the cheapest segments in the market, having suffered some of the biggest declines. Shares of Meta (NASDAQ: META), Alphabet (NASDAQ: GOOG), Nvidia (NASDAQ: NVDA), Amazon (NASDAQ: AMZN), Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT), and Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL) have suffered staggering losses in 2022 and look strongly undervalued. There’s no doubt that many of the Big Tech companies will see their stock performances improve as the economy mends and sentiment picks up, making their current prices look like decent entry points.Make sure to look beyond the price at the fundamentals, though. After the crazy rally and its bust, investors will be much more skeptical of bombastic growth promises that aren’t underpinned by solid numbers. When optimism returns, it will be much more realistic, at least for a while. So, it’d be a good idea to choose stocks of companies with robust earnings, ample cash, and strong growth prospects.In addition, have a look at another dirt-cheap equity segment: small caps. These stocks suffer in downturns but tend to outperform when the economy improves. Small-cap P/E ratios have reached their lowest levels in two decades, and the recession looks already priced into their valuations.To take advantage of this, you might want to have a look at the shares of Sarepta Therapeutics (NASDAQ: SRPT), Shockwave Medical (NASDAQ: SWAV), Lattice Semiconductor (NASDAQ: LSCC), Pure Storage (NYSE: PSTG), Tetra Tech (NASDAQ: TTEK), or WillScot Mobile Mini Holdings (NASDAQ: WSC), as they look promising.Bear Case: Bad Recession or High Rates for LongerIf you believe that 2023 may turn out to be another “risk-off” year but still want to remain invested, consider picking stocks of companies that don’t depend on cheap funding and are supported by ample cash, strong business models, and dominance in their markets. Dividend-paying companies are preferred; value stocks will likely outperform in this setting. Pay attention to the industries: discretionary products and services take a much bigger hit in recessions than those supplying the necessities.For example, Kraft Heinz (NASDAQ: KHC) is a leader in the packaged food market. It has substantial pricing power and pays stable dividends, which could help hedge against an economic downturn. Occidental Petroleum (NYSE: OXY) has been a great inflation hedge, trading ata P/E ratio of 5.2. Target (NYSE: TGT) is a dividend king with a strong market cap and solid profitability. Another high-dividend stock is Danaher (NYSE: DHR), a stable, diversified conglomerate. Johnson & Johnson (NYSE: JNJ) has plenty of cash, a high dividend yield, and vast market share. Top this list with Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE: BRK.B), the best-run financial conglomerate in the U.S., and you should be well-equipped for a recession.Bull Case: No Recession, Markets RallyIf you believe the U.S. economy will avoid a recession, you’d think that one should just buy everything at these prices, right? Well, no: it will take time for another broad “buy-all” rally to emerge; investors will be very selective for a while, putting money only on those companies that have established business models and resilient financials.Go with the “base-case” portfolio, adding to it some stocks from sectors that benefit from higher growth, basing your choice on reasonable stock pricing and good fundamentals. Considering adding tech anddiscretionary stocksto the portfolio, such as Sally Beauty (NYSE: SBH), trading at a P/E ratio of 7.5, Century Communities (NYSE: CCS) at 2.8, Green Brick Partners (NYSE: GRBK) at 3.99, Western Digital (NASDAQ: WDC) at 10.5, Stride (NYSE: LRN) at 15.0, Applied Materials (NASDAQ: AMAT) at 12.8, and ON Semiconductor (NASDAQ: ON) at 16.2.The Takeaway: Just Hold OnWhatever happens in 2023, remember: every bear market has ended with a new bull market. Hedge your portfolio to ride out the turbulence, and don’t lose calm.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":57,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9987567066,"gmtCreate":1667951630655,"gmtModify":1676537988432,"author":{"id":"3569303342488537","authorId":"3569303342488537","name":"ColeHii","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":1},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👍","listText":"👍","text":"👍","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":10,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9987567066","repostId":"2282951949","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2282951949","pubTimestamp":1667950541,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2282951949?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-11-09 07:35","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Disney, AMC, Affirm, and More: Top Trending Stocks After Hours","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2282951949","media":"Yahoo Finance","summary":"Disney (DIS): Despite reporting record full-year sales, Disney shares fell 6% in extended trading af","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>Disney (DIS):</b> Despite reporting record full-year sales, Disney shares fell 6% in extended trading after missing on both the top and bottom lines in its fiscal fourth quarter. The company posted adjusted earnings of 30 cents a share on sales of $20.15 billion. Disney+ added 12 million subscribers during the quarter, topping estimates, but streaming losses grew to $1.5 billion, up from $630 million a year ago. Despite widening losses, CEO Bob Chapeck told investors he “still sees Disney + achieving profitability in fiscal year 2024.”</p><p><b>AMC (AMC): </b>The movie theater chain’s losses widened to $226.9 million during the quarter, its 12th quarterly loss in a row, putting pressure on shares in after-hours trading. Revenue increased 27% to $968.4 million.</p><p><b>Affirm (AFRM):</b> Shares plunged after the company posted a wider than expected loss and weak guidance. Affirm expects fiscal second quarter revenue of $400 million to $420 million and full-year revenue of $1.6 billion to $1.675, short of analyst’s estimate.</p><p><b>Novavax (NVAX): </b>The vaccine maker reported revenue of $734.6 million, more than three times its sales from a year ago. NovaVax also reported it delivered over 94 million doses of Covid-19 vaccine globally to date. Despite the growth, Novavax lowered its 2022 revenue guidance to $2 billion, below the consensus estimate and at the lower end of its previous forecast.</p><p><b>Marathon Digital Holdings (MARA):</b> The crypto miner recorded a net loss of $75.4 million during the third quarter compared with a net loss of $22.2 million a year ago. Marathon’s chairman and CEO Fred Thiel wrote in the earnings release, “the third quarter of 2022 was a transition and rebuilding period at Marathon.” Revenue decline 75% from a year ago to $12.69 million.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Disney, AMC, Affirm, and More: Top Trending Stocks After Hours</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nDisney, AMC, Affirm, and More: Top Trending Stocks After Hours\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-11-09 07:35 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/top-trending-stocks-after-hours-disney-amc-affirm-and-more-230846983.html><strong>Yahoo Finance</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Disney (DIS): Despite reporting record full-year sales, Disney shares fell 6% in extended trading after missing on both the top and bottom lines in its fiscal fourth quarter. The company posted ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/top-trending-stocks-after-hours-disney-amc-affirm-and-more-230846983.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"DIS":"迪士尼","NVAX":"诺瓦瓦克斯医药","APE":"AMC Entertainment Preferred","MARA":"Marathon Digital Holdings Inc","AFRM":"Affirm Holdings, Inc.","AMC":"AMC院线"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/top-trending-stocks-after-hours-disney-amc-affirm-and-more-230846983.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2282951949","content_text":"Disney (DIS): Despite reporting record full-year sales, Disney shares fell 6% in extended trading after missing on both the top and bottom lines in its fiscal fourth quarter. The company posted adjusted earnings of 30 cents a share on sales of $20.15 billion. Disney+ added 12 million subscribers during the quarter, topping estimates, but streaming losses grew to $1.5 billion, up from $630 million a year ago. Despite widening losses, CEO Bob Chapeck told investors he “still sees Disney + achieving profitability in fiscal year 2024.”AMC (AMC): The movie theater chain’s losses widened to $226.9 million during the quarter, its 12th quarterly loss in a row, putting pressure on shares in after-hours trading. Revenue increased 27% to $968.4 million.Affirm (AFRM): Shares plunged after the company posted a wider than expected loss and weak guidance. Affirm expects fiscal second quarter revenue of $400 million to $420 million and full-year revenue of $1.6 billion to $1.675, short of analyst’s estimate.Novavax (NVAX): The vaccine maker reported revenue of $734.6 million, more than three times its sales from a year ago. NovaVax also reported it delivered over 94 million doses of Covid-19 vaccine globally to date. Despite the growth, Novavax lowered its 2022 revenue guidance to $2 billion, below the consensus estimate and at the lower end of its previous forecast.Marathon Digital Holdings (MARA): The crypto miner recorded a net loss of $75.4 million during the third quarter compared with a net loss of $22.2 million a year ago. Marathon’s chairman and CEO Fred Thiel wrote in the earnings release, “the third quarter of 2022 was a transition and rebuilding period at Marathon.” Revenue decline 75% from a year ago to $12.69 million.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":29,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":887517053,"gmtCreate":1632063562372,"gmtModify":1676530694627,"author":{"id":"3569303342488537","authorId":"3569303342488537","name":"ColeHii","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":1},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Wow","listText":"Wow","text":"Wow","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":12,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/887517053","repostId":"1198486138","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1198486138","pubTimestamp":1632023224,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1198486138?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-09-19 11:47","market":"us","language":"en","title":"7 ways men live without working in America","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1198486138","media":"Yahoo Finance","summary":"How do they live? What are they doing for money? ","content":"<p>Almost one-third of all working-age men in America aren’t doing diddly-squat. They don’t have a job, and they aren’t looking for one either. One-third of all working-age men. That’s almost 30 million people!</p>\n<p>How do they live? What are they doing for money? To me, this is one of the great mysteries of our time.</p>\n<p>I’m certainly not the first person to make note of this shocking statistic. You’ve heard people bemoaning this \"labor participation rate,\" which is simply the number of working-age men (usually counted as ages 16 to 64) not working or not looking for work, as a percentage of the overall labor force.</p>\n<p>It’s true that the pandemic, which of course produced a number of factors that made working more difficult never mind dangerous, pushed the labor participation rate to a record low. But the fact that millions of American males have not been working precedes COVID-19 by decades. In fact, the participation rate for men peaked at 87.4% in October 1949 and has been dropping steadily ever since. It now stands at 67.7%.</p>\n<p>As a business journalist for a good portion of those 70-plus years, I’ve looked at thousands of charts and graphs in my life, and I have to say this one is as jaw dropping as it is vexing:</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/056158b8fa7157238c3d1521dd05c02e\" tg-width=\"705\" tg-height=\"259\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">Chart of the U.S. labor force participation rate for men over time, courtesy of the St. Louis Federal Reserve</p>\n<p>Economists, sociologists, politicians, and cable news pundits each have their pet factors to explain the groundswell of non-work. But after digging down here, I’ve concluded there are many different forces at play. That’s what I want to explore today, which is: how men can live in America without working.</p>\n<p>I’m not talking about why men have lost their jobs — factories closing, layoffs, automation, outsourcing jobs overseas, even perhaps women entering the workforce, (in fact, the participation rate by women over the same time period is way up). What I want to get at is how they’re living without holding a \"real\" job, and by that I mean doing work where one reports income to the IRS, pays taxes and Social Security, etc.</p>\n<p>It’s important to note that every man in this group has his own story. They range from mentally ill homeless men who desperately need our help, to the I’m-doing-just-fine-thank-you-very-much, retired early, and former Silicon Valley coder. And there are infinite scenarios in between those two extremes, including, for instance, the many men who have chosen to bestay-at-home dadswhile their spouses work.</p>\n<p>It’s also the case that some men in this group may be unemployed and not seeking work because they’ve given up looking just for now — perhaps waiting for COVID to abate — and will start the search again soon. Here too, society needs to help.</p>\n<p>Still, none of this explains decade after decade of falling male employment.</p>\n<p>To that end, here to my mind are seven ways men are living without working in America:</p>\n<p><b>-Unemployment insurance</b></p>\n<p>Let’s start with this one because it’s a hot button issue. Conservatives and some liberals too have made the claim that state unemployment aid, coupled with $600 a week from the CARES Act, which was rolled out in March 2020, have reduced men’s need to work. (There are actually a variety of social programs at play,spelled out nicely hereby think tank The Century Foundation, which estimates that overall these programs have pumped $800 billion in the economy.) We’ll be getting a good read on whether all this relief did suppress employment now that CARES aid ended for some 7.5 million Americans earlier this month. But as Yahoo Finance’s Denitsa Tsekova reportedhereandhere, states that ended federal aid programs early didn’t see big increases in employment. That may mean these payments really weren’t enough to live off, or not enough to live off by themselves, which speaks to men looking to a combination of sources, like under the table income or family support and possibly some savings (see below).</p>\n<p><b>-Early retirement, pensions, disability and lawsuits</b></p>\n<p>Admittedly, this is a bit of a hodgepodge. And as is the case with many of these categories, hard data is tough to come by, but it is the case that millions of men under 64 are at least partly living off of pensions and 401(k)s. This would include everything from C-suite executives to union members. And don’t forget municipal workers, who make up almost 14% of the U.S. workforce. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, there are some 6,000 public sector retirement systems in the U.S.Collectively these plans have $4.5 trillion in assets,with 14.7 million working members and 11.2 million retirees. The plans distribute $323 billion in benefits annually, and again, some to men who are younger than 64. In fact in almost two-thirds of these plans,if you started working at 25, you max out at 57, a real inducement to stop working — at least at that job of course.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/53e26b293f8a939a54b78315c3375a18\" tg-width=\"705\" tg-height=\"467\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">Volunteers load cars with turkeys and other food assistance for laid off Walt Disney World cast members and others at a food distribution event on December 12, 2020 in Orlando, Florida. (Photo by Paul Hennessy/NurPhoto via Getty Images)More</p>\n<p>There’s also disability insurance from the Social Security Administration that is beingpaid to some 9 million Americanswhomay receive payments many years before retirement age. That's why I am including disability here, but not plain vanilla Social Security, which you can’t receive until age 62. The maximum disability benefit amount you can receive each month is currently $3,148. (However, the average beneficiary receives about $1,277 per month, according to the law group Social Security Disability Advocates.) Overall, it looks like theSSA pays out some $130 billion in disability annually.That’s not nothing. Then there’s money paid out in medical malpractice each year, smaller true, but stillestimated to be in excess of $3 billion.And don't forgetpayments from legal settlements and class action lawsuits.</p>\n<p>You argue all day about the right or wrong when it comes to these payouts, but the fact is many of them didn’t exist, or not at this magnitude, decades ago.</p>\n<p><b>-Savings, trading stocks, and bitcoin</b></p>\n<p>Consider now men are living off savings, or from money made in the market or maybe even selling NFTs. How many is it exactly? Who knows, but quite a few for sure. First off, Americans on average do have some money in the bank. Savings as a percentage of disposable income,according to the Federal Reserve of Kansas City,hit a record high of 33% in the spring of 2020 and is still at 14%, or nearly twice as high as it was prior to the pandemic.</p>\n<p>And according to arecent survey by Northwestern Mutual,average personal savings are up over 10% compared to last year, from $65,900 last year to $73,100. Average retirement savings increased 13%, from $87,500 last year to $98,800 today. So there’s that.</p>\n<p>Next let’s look at investing — first stocks. It is not irrelevant to this narrative that the S&amp;P 500 has climbed from 2,480 on March 12, 2020 — the day after the World Health Organization declared COVID a pandemic— to 4,441 today, or almost 80%. That’s a huge gain. Much of the action of course has been retail investors and the meme stock boom, as millions of American males stuck at home with nothing to do all day for the past 18 months passed the time trading stocks. Credit Suisse estimates that since the beginning of 2020, “retail trading as a share of overall market activityhas nearly doubledfrom between 15% and 18% to over 30%,” as CNBC reported. How many men were doing this and supporting themselves? Unclear, but upstart trading platform Robinhood (HOOD) — the broker dealer of choice for many of these new investors — reported that it had22.5 million funded user accountslast month, up from 7.2 million in March of 2020. Let’s just say 15 million new accounts is quite a number.</p>\n<p>Now crypto. You can laugh all you want, but the simple fact is that theprice of bitcoinis up from $4,861 on March 12, 2000 to $47,763 today, or basically up 10X, (and remember it even hit $64,888.99 this spring). Back to Robinhood, which according to The New York Times, also reported last month that “revenue from cryptocurrency trading fees totaled $233 million, a nearly 50-fold jump from $5 million a year earlier.” (And those are just fees off the trades, mind you.) Bottom line: Folks have made money here. (Of course these guys should be paying taxes on all those stock and crypto gains.)</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/809084435ffdcbc0695311d158bb7a98\" tg-width=\"705\" tg-height=\"470\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">Robinhood Markets, Inc. CEO and co-founder Vlad Tenev and co-founder Baiju Bhatt pose with Robinhood signage on Wall Street after the company's IPO in New York City, U.S., July 29, 2021. REUTERS/Andrew Kelly<b>-Working for cash, aka the under-the-table economy</b></p>\n<p>This one is very tough to measure, too.A study by the Federal Reserve of St. Louisestimates that the average size of the “informal economy” in developed countries is 13% of GDP. Honestly, that could be off by many percentage points, but just to give you a ballpark, GDP in the U.S. this year is about $22 trillion. So 13% of that is $2.86 trillion. As it turns out, $2 trillion-plus, is a number that has been thrown around quite a bit (hereandherefor instance) when it comes to estimating the size of the cash economy in the U.S. Even if half that money is paid out to women, that still leaves, say, $1 trillion dollars being made by men in this country off the books. That’s a big chunk of change. Are more people than ever working for cash these days? Again, another question that’s impossible to answer. I would bet it’s not fewer. For example, my electrician Luis just told me he can’t get anyone to work for him anymore — they all want to get paid in cash.</p>\n<p><b>-Living off family members</b></p>\n<p>Just to take one facet,the Pew Research Center reportedlast year that the pandemic “has pushed millions of Americans, especially young adults, to move in with family members. The share of 18- to 29-year-olds living with their parents has become a majority since U.S. coronavirus cases began spreading [in early 2020], surpassing the previous peak during the Great Depression era. In July, 52% of young adults resided with one or both of their parents, up from 47% in February.” How many of these individuals are males living rent free (and sharing food too), which maybe means they don’t have to work? Who knows, but some. Ditto for males who have moved in with in-laws or siblings. And again, many men are choosing to stay home and take care of kids while their spouses work.</p>\n<p><b>-Illegal work</b></p>\n<p>Front and center here is selling illegal drugs. Sadly, business looks to be booming, that is if overdoses are any sort of measure.According to the Washington Post, overdose deaths hit 93,000 last year, up a stunning 30% from 2019. Most of the overdoses were attributed to opioids; heroin, synthetic opioids like OxyContin and in particular Fentanyl. (This despite drug dealers facingsupply chain issuesduring COVID.) How many Americans are in this business and who are they? A number is almost impossible to come by here, but as for who they are,a government report on drug trafficking arrestsfrom five years ago notes that ”the majority of drug trafficking offenders were male (84.9%), the average age of these offenders at sentencing was 36 years, 70% were United States citizens (although this rate varied substantially depending on the type of drug involved), and that almost half (49.4%) of drug traffickers had little or no prior criminal history.” How big a business is selling drugs in America? Could beas much as $100 billion.I think it’s fair to say that a market that size requires many thousands of employees.</p>\n<p>What about other types of crime and criminals, everything from robbers and thieves to prostitutes and pimps? To that point there aresome 2 million people incarcerated in the U.S.right now. (We have the highest absolute number and the highest per capita on the planet, and holdsome 25% of the world's total prisoners, according to the ACLU.) Being in prison is another way of living in America without working, I guess. But not counting those locked up, how many bad guys are out there on the street? Conservatively, it has to be thousands and thousands, and speaking to this story, they're all doing their thing and not participating in the labor force.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3f8f4b3e6a5aa97a10f5c7bb22dec1d7\" tg-width=\"705\" tg-height=\"470\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">ORLEANS, MASSACHUSETTS - JULY 10: A man holds onto a clamming rake while clamming at low tide July 10, 2021 in Town Cove, Orleans, Massachusetts. He filled a bushel basket of cherry stone clams. (Photo by Robert Nickelsberg/Getty Images)More<b>-Living off the land</b></p>\n<p>This would include gardening, fishing, hunting, clamming, berrying, and just general foraging. The numbers here seem to be climbing. Here for instancefrom The Guardian:</p>\n<p>“Fishing and huntinglicense sales increased 10%in California during the pandemic, reversing years of decline. Clamming has grown in popularity for several reasons: people are looking for safe activities to do outdoors, but also some are clamming for subsistence and trying to get money from selling the shellfish (which is illegal without a commercial license).”</p>\n<p>Ditto for Washington state, according to The Spokesman-Review:</p>\n<p>“From the start of the 2020 licensing year in May through Dec. 31, WDFW [Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife] sold nearly 45,000 more fishing licenses and 12,000 more hunting licenses than 2019. The number of new license holders — defined as someone who hadn’t purchased one for the previous five years — went up 16% for fishing licenses and almost 40% for hunters.”</p>\n<p>As for growing vegetables in home gardens, yes, it is up, way up too. Even before the pandemic, there were estimates thata third of American families grew vegetables.Now this,NPRreported last year:</p>\n<p>“‘We're being flooded with vegetable orders,’ says George Ball, executive chairman of the Burpee Seed Company, based in Warminster, Penn.</p>\n<p>Ball says he has noticed spikes in seed sales during bad times: the stock market crash of 1987, the dot com bubble burst of 2000, and he remembers the two oil crises of the 1970s from his childhood. But he says he has not seen a spike this large and widespread.</p>\n<p>So there you have it. It’s a whole range of ways and means, behaviors and experiences. I’m sure I missed some, too. Again, some non-working men are in dire straits and need our help. Others are living non-working lives without burdening society or others, such as a fireman on early retirement (though some argue municipal employee pensions are too high), or an investor who made a ton of money in the market and called it quits, or maybe a wilderness guy living off the land in Alaska.</p>\n<p>And some non-working men are not playing fair. Like getting paid under the table, fudging insurance claims or social programs. Some freeload off relatives. And some engage in overtly illegal behavior like boosting branded goods from chain stores to sell online or dealing heroin.</p>\n<p>I would imagine that more than a few of these men create a portfolio of sources, though I’m not sure they really think of it that way. Take for example a hypothetical guy in a rural area who lives with his grandmother rent free, (he does help her with the garden some). This guy also does some cash carpentry work, hunts for game, gets some food off his ex-wife’s WIC and helps his brother sell some weed. Can you get by this way? Some men probably are. Is this the new American way? For some men it probably is.</p>\n<p>That example perhaps, and to be sure of all of the above, I think go a long way toward explaining that chart from the beginning of the story, the one that shows the labor participation rate falling off a cliff over the past seven decades. And speaking of charts, another striking one came to mind when I was writing this, which I put here below. It shows U.S. GDP over the same time period as the labor participation rate.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0f197be5c6c11483ec906a1757293e4d\" tg-width=\"705\" tg-height=\"259\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">Chart of the U.S. Gross Domestic Product over time, courtesy of the St. Louis Federal Reserve</p>\n<p>Of course, the line on this GDP chart is inversely correlated with the line on the labor participation graph. And I think there is a relationship between the two. Which is to say, the wealthier our nation has become over the decades, the less men are working. Fact is there is just a ton of money sloshing around in our country. And men seem to be able to get their hands on it, whether obtained legally, borrowed, leached off of or stolen.</p>\n<p>It seems like working legally to provide for yourself in America is really just one option these days.</p>\n<p><b><i>This article was featured in a Saturday edition of the Morning Brief on September 18, 2021. Get the Morning Brief sent directly to your inbox every Monday to Friday by 6:30 a.m. ET.Subscribe</i></b></p>\n<p><i>Andy Serwer is editor-in-chief of Yahoo Finance. Follow him on Twitter:@serwer</i></p>","source":"yahoofinance_sg","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>7 ways men live without working in America</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n7 ways men live without working in America\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-09-19 11:47 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/7-ways-men-live-without-working-in-america-092147068.html><strong>Yahoo Finance</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Almost one-third of all working-age men in America aren’t doing diddly-squat. They don’t have a job, and they aren’t looking for one either. One-third of all working-age men. That’s almost 30 million ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/7-ways-men-live-without-working-in-america-092147068.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/020219c8820f9fc9f11979454ce1b1c6","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/7-ways-men-live-without-working-in-america-092147068.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1198486138","content_text":"Almost one-third of all working-age men in America aren’t doing diddly-squat. They don’t have a job, and they aren’t looking for one either. One-third of all working-age men. That’s almost 30 million people!\nHow do they live? What are they doing for money? To me, this is one of the great mysteries of our time.\nI’m certainly not the first person to make note of this shocking statistic. You’ve heard people bemoaning this \"labor participation rate,\" which is simply the number of working-age men (usually counted as ages 16 to 64) not working or not looking for work, as a percentage of the overall labor force.\nIt’s true that the pandemic, which of course produced a number of factors that made working more difficult never mind dangerous, pushed the labor participation rate to a record low. But the fact that millions of American males have not been working precedes COVID-19 by decades. In fact, the participation rate for men peaked at 87.4% in October 1949 and has been dropping steadily ever since. It now stands at 67.7%.\nAs a business journalist for a good portion of those 70-plus years, I’ve looked at thousands of charts and graphs in my life, and I have to say this one is as jaw dropping as it is vexing:\nChart of the U.S. labor force participation rate for men over time, courtesy of the St. Louis Federal Reserve\nEconomists, sociologists, politicians, and cable news pundits each have their pet factors to explain the groundswell of non-work. But after digging down here, I’ve concluded there are many different forces at play. That’s what I want to explore today, which is: how men can live in America without working.\nI’m not talking about why men have lost their jobs — factories closing, layoffs, automation, outsourcing jobs overseas, even perhaps women entering the workforce, (in fact, the participation rate by women over the same time period is way up). What I want to get at is how they’re living without holding a \"real\" job, and by that I mean doing work where one reports income to the IRS, pays taxes and Social Security, etc.\nIt’s important to note that every man in this group has his own story. They range from mentally ill homeless men who desperately need our help, to the I’m-doing-just-fine-thank-you-very-much, retired early, and former Silicon Valley coder. And there are infinite scenarios in between those two extremes, including, for instance, the many men who have chosen to bestay-at-home dadswhile their spouses work.\nIt’s also the case that some men in this group may be unemployed and not seeking work because they’ve given up looking just for now — perhaps waiting for COVID to abate — and will start the search again soon. Here too, society needs to help.\nStill, none of this explains decade after decade of falling male employment.\nTo that end, here to my mind are seven ways men are living without working in America:\n-Unemployment insurance\nLet’s start with this one because it’s a hot button issue. Conservatives and some liberals too have made the claim that state unemployment aid, coupled with $600 a week from the CARES Act, which was rolled out in March 2020, have reduced men’s need to work. (There are actually a variety of social programs at play,spelled out nicely hereby think tank The Century Foundation, which estimates that overall these programs have pumped $800 billion in the economy.) We’ll be getting a good read on whether all this relief did suppress employment now that CARES aid ended for some 7.5 million Americans earlier this month. But as Yahoo Finance’s Denitsa Tsekova reportedhereandhere, states that ended federal aid programs early didn’t see big increases in employment. That may mean these payments really weren’t enough to live off, or not enough to live off by themselves, which speaks to men looking to a combination of sources, like under the table income or family support and possibly some savings (see below).\n-Early retirement, pensions, disability and lawsuits\nAdmittedly, this is a bit of a hodgepodge. And as is the case with many of these categories, hard data is tough to come by, but it is the case that millions of men under 64 are at least partly living off of pensions and 401(k)s. This would include everything from C-suite executives to union members. And don’t forget municipal workers, who make up almost 14% of the U.S. workforce. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, there are some 6,000 public sector retirement systems in the U.S.Collectively these plans have $4.5 trillion in assets,with 14.7 million working members and 11.2 million retirees. The plans distribute $323 billion in benefits annually, and again, some to men who are younger than 64. In fact in almost two-thirds of these plans,if you started working at 25, you max out at 57, a real inducement to stop working — at least at that job of course.\nVolunteers load cars with turkeys and other food assistance for laid off Walt Disney World cast members and others at a food distribution event on December 12, 2020 in Orlando, Florida. (Photo by Paul Hennessy/NurPhoto via Getty Images)More\nThere’s also disability insurance from the Social Security Administration that is beingpaid to some 9 million Americanswhomay receive payments many years before retirement age. That's why I am including disability here, but not plain vanilla Social Security, which you can’t receive until age 62. The maximum disability benefit amount you can receive each month is currently $3,148. (However, the average beneficiary receives about $1,277 per month, according to the law group Social Security Disability Advocates.) Overall, it looks like theSSA pays out some $130 billion in disability annually.That’s not nothing. Then there’s money paid out in medical malpractice each year, smaller true, but stillestimated to be in excess of $3 billion.And don't forgetpayments from legal settlements and class action lawsuits.\nYou argue all day about the right or wrong when it comes to these payouts, but the fact is many of them didn’t exist, or not at this magnitude, decades ago.\n-Savings, trading stocks, and bitcoin\nConsider now men are living off savings, or from money made in the market or maybe even selling NFTs. How many is it exactly? Who knows, but quite a few for sure. First off, Americans on average do have some money in the bank. Savings as a percentage of disposable income,according to the Federal Reserve of Kansas City,hit a record high of 33% in the spring of 2020 and is still at 14%, or nearly twice as high as it was prior to the pandemic.\nAnd according to arecent survey by Northwestern Mutual,average personal savings are up over 10% compared to last year, from $65,900 last year to $73,100. Average retirement savings increased 13%, from $87,500 last year to $98,800 today. So there’s that.\nNext let’s look at investing — first stocks. It is not irrelevant to this narrative that the S&P 500 has climbed from 2,480 on March 12, 2020 — the day after the World Health Organization declared COVID a pandemic— to 4,441 today, or almost 80%. That’s a huge gain. Much of the action of course has been retail investors and the meme stock boom, as millions of American males stuck at home with nothing to do all day for the past 18 months passed the time trading stocks. Credit Suisse estimates that since the beginning of 2020, “retail trading as a share of overall market activityhas nearly doubledfrom between 15% and 18% to over 30%,” as CNBC reported. How many men were doing this and supporting themselves? Unclear, but upstart trading platform Robinhood (HOOD) — the broker dealer of choice for many of these new investors — reported that it had22.5 million funded user accountslast month, up from 7.2 million in March of 2020. Let’s just say 15 million new accounts is quite a number.\nNow crypto. You can laugh all you want, but the simple fact is that theprice of bitcoinis up from $4,861 on March 12, 2000 to $47,763 today, or basically up 10X, (and remember it even hit $64,888.99 this spring). Back to Robinhood, which according to The New York Times, also reported last month that “revenue from cryptocurrency trading fees totaled $233 million, a nearly 50-fold jump from $5 million a year earlier.” (And those are just fees off the trades, mind you.) Bottom line: Folks have made money here. (Of course these guys should be paying taxes on all those stock and crypto gains.)\nRobinhood Markets, Inc. CEO and co-founder Vlad Tenev and co-founder Baiju Bhatt pose with Robinhood signage on Wall Street after the company's IPO in New York City, U.S., July 29, 2021. REUTERS/Andrew Kelly-Working for cash, aka the under-the-table economy\nThis one is very tough to measure, too.A study by the Federal Reserve of St. Louisestimates that the average size of the “informal economy” in developed countries is 13% of GDP. Honestly, that could be off by many percentage points, but just to give you a ballpark, GDP in the U.S. this year is about $22 trillion. So 13% of that is $2.86 trillion. As it turns out, $2 trillion-plus, is a number that has been thrown around quite a bit (hereandherefor instance) when it comes to estimating the size of the cash economy in the U.S. Even if half that money is paid out to women, that still leaves, say, $1 trillion dollars being made by men in this country off the books. That’s a big chunk of change. Are more people than ever working for cash these days? Again, another question that’s impossible to answer. I would bet it’s not fewer. For example, my electrician Luis just told me he can’t get anyone to work for him anymore — they all want to get paid in cash.\n-Living off family members\nJust to take one facet,the Pew Research Center reportedlast year that the pandemic “has pushed millions of Americans, especially young adults, to move in with family members. The share of 18- to 29-year-olds living with their parents has become a majority since U.S. coronavirus cases began spreading [in early 2020], surpassing the previous peak during the Great Depression era. In July, 52% of young adults resided with one or both of their parents, up from 47% in February.” How many of these individuals are males living rent free (and sharing food too), which maybe means they don’t have to work? Who knows, but some. Ditto for males who have moved in with in-laws or siblings. And again, many men are choosing to stay home and take care of kids while their spouses work.\n-Illegal work\nFront and center here is selling illegal drugs. Sadly, business looks to be booming, that is if overdoses are any sort of measure.According to the Washington Post, overdose deaths hit 93,000 last year, up a stunning 30% from 2019. Most of the overdoses were attributed to opioids; heroin, synthetic opioids like OxyContin and in particular Fentanyl. (This despite drug dealers facingsupply chain issuesduring COVID.) How many Americans are in this business and who are they? A number is almost impossible to come by here, but as for who they are,a government report on drug trafficking arrestsfrom five years ago notes that ”the majority of drug trafficking offenders were male (84.9%), the average age of these offenders at sentencing was 36 years, 70% were United States citizens (although this rate varied substantially depending on the type of drug involved), and that almost half (49.4%) of drug traffickers had little or no prior criminal history.” How big a business is selling drugs in America? Could beas much as $100 billion.I think it’s fair to say that a market that size requires many thousands of employees.\nWhat about other types of crime and criminals, everything from robbers and thieves to prostitutes and pimps? To that point there aresome 2 million people incarcerated in the U.S.right now. (We have the highest absolute number and the highest per capita on the planet, and holdsome 25% of the world's total prisoners, according to the ACLU.) Being in prison is another way of living in America without working, I guess. But not counting those locked up, how many bad guys are out there on the street? Conservatively, it has to be thousands and thousands, and speaking to this story, they're all doing their thing and not participating in the labor force.\nORLEANS, MASSACHUSETTS - JULY 10: A man holds onto a clamming rake while clamming at low tide July 10, 2021 in Town Cove, Orleans, Massachusetts. He filled a bushel basket of cherry stone clams. (Photo by Robert Nickelsberg/Getty Images)More-Living off the land\nThis would include gardening, fishing, hunting, clamming, berrying, and just general foraging. The numbers here seem to be climbing. Here for instancefrom The Guardian:\n“Fishing and huntinglicense sales increased 10%in California during the pandemic, reversing years of decline. Clamming has grown in popularity for several reasons: people are looking for safe activities to do outdoors, but also some are clamming for subsistence and trying to get money from selling the shellfish (which is illegal without a commercial license).”\nDitto for Washington state, according to The Spokesman-Review:\n“From the start of the 2020 licensing year in May through Dec. 31, WDFW [Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife] sold nearly 45,000 more fishing licenses and 12,000 more hunting licenses than 2019. The number of new license holders — defined as someone who hadn’t purchased one for the previous five years — went up 16% for fishing licenses and almost 40% for hunters.”\nAs for growing vegetables in home gardens, yes, it is up, way up too. Even before the pandemic, there were estimates thata third of American families grew vegetables.Now this,NPRreported last year:\n“‘We're being flooded with vegetable orders,’ says George Ball, executive chairman of the Burpee Seed Company, based in Warminster, Penn.\nBall says he has noticed spikes in seed sales during bad times: the stock market crash of 1987, the dot com bubble burst of 2000, and he remembers the two oil crises of the 1970s from his childhood. But he says he has not seen a spike this large and widespread.\nSo there you have it. It’s a whole range of ways and means, behaviors and experiences. I’m sure I missed some, too. Again, some non-working men are in dire straits and need our help. Others are living non-working lives without burdening society or others, such as a fireman on early retirement (though some argue municipal employee pensions are too high), or an investor who made a ton of money in the market and called it quits, or maybe a wilderness guy living off the land in Alaska.\nAnd some non-working men are not playing fair. Like getting paid under the table, fudging insurance claims or social programs. Some freeload off relatives. And some engage in overtly illegal behavior like boosting branded goods from chain stores to sell online or dealing heroin.\nI would imagine that more than a few of these men create a portfolio of sources, though I’m not sure they really think of it that way. Take for example a hypothetical guy in a rural area who lives with his grandmother rent free, (he does help her with the garden some). This guy also does some cash carpentry work, hunts for game, gets some food off his ex-wife’s WIC and helps his brother sell some weed. Can you get by this way? Some men probably are. Is this the new American way? For some men it probably is.\nThat example perhaps, and to be sure of all of the above, I think go a long way toward explaining that chart from the beginning of the story, the one that shows the labor participation rate falling off a cliff over the past seven decades. And speaking of charts, another striking one came to mind when I was writing this, which I put here below. It shows U.S. GDP over the same time period as the labor participation rate.\nChart of the U.S. Gross Domestic Product over time, courtesy of the St. Louis Federal Reserve\nOf course, the line on this GDP chart is inversely correlated with the line on the labor participation graph. And I think there is a relationship between the two. Which is to say, the wealthier our nation has become over the decades, the less men are working. Fact is there is just a ton of money sloshing around in our country. And men seem to be able to get their hands on it, whether obtained legally, borrowed, leached off of or stolen.\nIt seems like working legally to provide for yourself in America is really just one option these days.\nThis article was featured in a Saturday edition of the Morning Brief on September 18, 2021. Get the Morning Brief sent directly to your inbox every Monday to Friday by 6:30 a.m. ET.Subscribe\nAndy Serwer is editor-in-chief of Yahoo Finance. Follow him on Twitter:@serwer","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":7,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":810505143,"gmtCreate":1629985108182,"gmtModify":1676530192472,"author":{"id":"3569303342488537","authorId":"3569303342488537","name":"ColeHii","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":1},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like please","listText":"Like please","text":"Like please","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":8,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/810505143","repostId":"1120391898","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1120391898","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1629984746,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1120391898?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-08-26 21:32","market":"us","language":"en","title":"S&P 500 opens flat near a record as investors await Fed summit","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1120391898","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"The S&P 500 was little changed Thursday morning, following the benchmark's rally above the 4,500 lev","content":"<p>The S&amp;P 500 was little changed Thursday morning, following the benchmark's rally above the 4,500 level for the first time ever in the prior session, as investors await the Federal Reserve's annual symposium on Friday.</p>\n<p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average rose about 24 points, or 0.1%. The S&amp;P 500 lost 0.08% and the Nasdaq Composite fell 0.09%.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/aeb3e35b07de26deb37e5b218327ded1\" tg-width=\"1038\" tg-height=\"492\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>Weekly initial jobless claims&nbsp;came in at 353,000, the Labor Department reported Thursday morning, a slight increase from the prior week’s 349,000. Economists polled by Dow Jones expected 350,000 Americans filed for unemployment last week.</p>\n<p>Economic&nbsp;growth totaled 6.6%&nbsp;in the second quarter, according to the Commerce Department’s second estimate Thursday. That was a slight revision upward from the 6.5% annual increase&nbsp;previously reported&nbsp;but slightly lower than the Dow Jones estimate of 6.7%.</p>\n<p>The highly anticipated Jackson Hole symposium from the Federal Reserve will be held virtually this year on Friday, with many central bank speakers making remarks to the media beginning Thursday. At the event, central bankers could provide updates on their plan around tapering monetary stimulus.</p>\n<p>Esther George, president of the Kansas City Fed, told CNBC Thursday morning that “given the progress we’ve seen,” Fed&nbsp;tapering is “appropriate,”though she didn’t specify when she thinks it should start.</p>\n<p>“When you look at the job gains we saw last month, the month before, you look at the level of inflation right now, I think it would suggest that the level of accommodation we’re providing right now is probably not needed in this scenario,” she said. “So I would be ready to talk about taper sooner rather than later.”</p>\n<p>Shares of&nbsp;Salesforce&nbsp;rose nearly 4% on&nbsp;fiscal second-quarter earnings&nbsp;and forward guidance that exceeded analysts' estimates.Ulta Beauty&nbsp;rose more than 1% after reporting strong results.</p>\n<p>Zoom Video shares jumped more than 5%&nbsp;after Morgan Stanley upgraded the stockand predicted 18% upside.</p>\n<p>On&nbsp;Wednesday, the S&amp;P 500 gained 0.22% to close at a record, led by stocks that benefit from the economic reopening like airlines, cruise lines and financials. The 500-stock average crossed the 4,500 threshold for the first time ever on Wednesday, but closed below that level. The benchmark is up 105% from its pandemic low.</p>\n<p>The Nasdaq Composite rose 0.15%, also notching a record close. The Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 39 points.</p>\n<p>“While we remain believers in the secular bull market for US equities, we have suggested raising some cash in U.S. equities given lower highs (aka bearish divergences) across a variety of indicators, weaker August-October seasonality, the Presidential Cycle moving into its weakest period and bearish signals from margin debt,” wrote Stephen Suttmeier, technical research strategist at Bank of America.</p>\n<p>The yield on the benchmark 10-year Treasury note rose as high as 1.352% Wednesday as concerns about slowing growth from the delta variant eased, hitting its highest level since earlier in the month when it yielded as much as 1.364%.</p>\n<p>“The 10-year Treasury bond yield has continued rising in recent days and exploded higher in [Wednesday’s] trading, sending a strong message that the Delta variant of Covid may be peaking in the U.S. which should improve confidence, restart economic reopenings, and drive investment flows toward small caps and cyclicals,” said Jim Paulsen, chief investment strategist at the Leuthold Group.</p>\n<p>Chairman Jerome Powell is slated to make remarks on Friday as part of the Fed’s summit. The Federal Reserve has been purchasing at least $120 billion of bonds per month to curb longer-term interest rates and jumpstart economic growth in reaction to the pandemic.</p>\n<p>“Expect investors to keep an eye on the Fed’s symposium the rest of this week for any comments about tapering or timing for interest rate hikes,” said Paulsen. “Either unexpected commentary from the Fed or a failure or success in scaling 4500 could bring additional volatility to the stock and bond markets.”</p>\n<p>Several companies report quarterly earnings on Thursday including&nbsp;Dell Technologies,Gap,HP&nbsp;and&nbsp;Abercrombie &amp; Fitch.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>S&P 500 opens flat near a record as investors await Fed summit</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nS&P 500 opens flat near a record as investors await Fed summit\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-08-26 21:32</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>The S&amp;P 500 was little changed Thursday morning, following the benchmark's rally above the 4,500 level for the first time ever in the prior session, as investors await the Federal Reserve's annual symposium on Friday.</p>\n<p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average rose about 24 points, or 0.1%. The S&amp;P 500 lost 0.08% and the Nasdaq Composite fell 0.09%.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/aeb3e35b07de26deb37e5b218327ded1\" tg-width=\"1038\" tg-height=\"492\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>Weekly initial jobless claims&nbsp;came in at 353,000, the Labor Department reported Thursday morning, a slight increase from the prior week’s 349,000. Economists polled by Dow Jones expected 350,000 Americans filed for unemployment last week.</p>\n<p>Economic&nbsp;growth totaled 6.6%&nbsp;in the second quarter, according to the Commerce Department’s second estimate Thursday. That was a slight revision upward from the 6.5% annual increase&nbsp;previously reported&nbsp;but slightly lower than the Dow Jones estimate of 6.7%.</p>\n<p>The highly anticipated Jackson Hole symposium from the Federal Reserve will be held virtually this year on Friday, with many central bank speakers making remarks to the media beginning Thursday. At the event, central bankers could provide updates on their plan around tapering monetary stimulus.</p>\n<p>Esther George, president of the Kansas City Fed, told CNBC Thursday morning that “given the progress we’ve seen,” Fed&nbsp;tapering is “appropriate,”though she didn’t specify when she thinks it should start.</p>\n<p>“When you look at the job gains we saw last month, the month before, you look at the level of inflation right now, I think it would suggest that the level of accommodation we’re providing right now is probably not needed in this scenario,” she said. “So I would be ready to talk about taper sooner rather than later.”</p>\n<p>Shares of&nbsp;Salesforce&nbsp;rose nearly 4% on&nbsp;fiscal second-quarter earnings&nbsp;and forward guidance that exceeded analysts' estimates.Ulta Beauty&nbsp;rose more than 1% after reporting strong results.</p>\n<p>Zoom Video shares jumped more than 5%&nbsp;after Morgan Stanley upgraded the stockand predicted 18% upside.</p>\n<p>On&nbsp;Wednesday, the S&amp;P 500 gained 0.22% to close at a record, led by stocks that benefit from the economic reopening like airlines, cruise lines and financials. The 500-stock average crossed the 4,500 threshold for the first time ever on Wednesday, but closed below that level. The benchmark is up 105% from its pandemic low.</p>\n<p>The Nasdaq Composite rose 0.15%, also notching a record close. The Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 39 points.</p>\n<p>“While we remain believers in the secular bull market for US equities, we have suggested raising some cash in U.S. equities given lower highs (aka bearish divergences) across a variety of indicators, weaker August-October seasonality, the Presidential Cycle moving into its weakest period and bearish signals from margin debt,” wrote Stephen Suttmeier, technical research strategist at Bank of America.</p>\n<p>The yield on the benchmark 10-year Treasury note rose as high as 1.352% Wednesday as concerns about slowing growth from the delta variant eased, hitting its highest level since earlier in the month when it yielded as much as 1.364%.</p>\n<p>“The 10-year Treasury bond yield has continued rising in recent days and exploded higher in [Wednesday’s] trading, sending a strong message that the Delta variant of Covid may be peaking in the U.S. which should improve confidence, restart economic reopenings, and drive investment flows toward small caps and cyclicals,” said Jim Paulsen, chief investment strategist at the Leuthold Group.</p>\n<p>Chairman Jerome Powell is slated to make remarks on Friday as part of the Fed’s summit. The Federal Reserve has been purchasing at least $120 billion of bonds per month to curb longer-term interest rates and jumpstart economic growth in reaction to the pandemic.</p>\n<p>“Expect investors to keep an eye on the Fed’s symposium the rest of this week for any comments about tapering or timing for interest rate hikes,” said Paulsen. “Either unexpected commentary from the Fed or a failure or success in scaling 4500 could bring additional volatility to the stock and bond markets.”</p>\n<p>Several companies report quarterly earnings on Thursday including&nbsp;Dell Technologies,Gap,HP&nbsp;and&nbsp;Abercrombie &amp; Fitch.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1120391898","content_text":"The S&P 500 was little changed Thursday morning, following the benchmark's rally above the 4,500 level for the first time ever in the prior session, as investors await the Federal Reserve's annual symposium on Friday.\nThe Dow Jones Industrial Average rose about 24 points, or 0.1%. The S&P 500 lost 0.08% and the Nasdaq Composite fell 0.09%.\n\nWeekly initial jobless claims came in at 353,000, the Labor Department reported Thursday morning, a slight increase from the prior week’s 349,000. Economists polled by Dow Jones expected 350,000 Americans filed for unemployment last week.\nEconomic growth totaled 6.6% in the second quarter, according to the Commerce Department’s second estimate Thursday. That was a slight revision upward from the 6.5% annual increase previously reported but slightly lower than the Dow Jones estimate of 6.7%.\nThe highly anticipated Jackson Hole symposium from the Federal Reserve will be held virtually this year on Friday, with many central bank speakers making remarks to the media beginning Thursday. At the event, central bankers could provide updates on their plan around tapering monetary stimulus.\nEsther George, president of the Kansas City Fed, told CNBC Thursday morning that “given the progress we’ve seen,” Fed tapering is “appropriate,”though she didn’t specify when she thinks it should start.\n“When you look at the job gains we saw last month, the month before, you look at the level of inflation right now, I think it would suggest that the level of accommodation we’re providing right now is probably not needed in this scenario,” she said. “So I would be ready to talk about taper sooner rather than later.”\nShares of Salesforce rose nearly 4% on fiscal second-quarter earnings and forward guidance that exceeded analysts' estimates.Ulta Beauty rose more than 1% after reporting strong results.\nZoom Video shares jumped more than 5% after Morgan Stanley upgraded the stockand predicted 18% upside.\nOn Wednesday, the S&P 500 gained 0.22% to close at a record, led by stocks that benefit from the economic reopening like airlines, cruise lines and financials. The 500-stock average crossed the 4,500 threshold for the first time ever on Wednesday, but closed below that level. The benchmark is up 105% from its pandemic low.\nThe Nasdaq Composite rose 0.15%, also notching a record close. The Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 39 points.\n“While we remain believers in the secular bull market for US equities, we have suggested raising some cash in U.S. equities given lower highs (aka bearish divergences) across a variety of indicators, weaker August-October seasonality, the Presidential Cycle moving into its weakest period and bearish signals from margin debt,” wrote Stephen Suttmeier, technical research strategist at Bank of America.\nThe yield on the benchmark 10-year Treasury note rose as high as 1.352% Wednesday as concerns about slowing growth from the delta variant eased, hitting its highest level since earlier in the month when it yielded as much as 1.364%.\n“The 10-year Treasury bond yield has continued rising in recent days and exploded higher in [Wednesday’s] trading, sending a strong message that the Delta variant of Covid may be peaking in the U.S. which should improve confidence, restart economic reopenings, and drive investment flows toward small caps and cyclicals,” said Jim Paulsen, chief investment strategist at the Leuthold Group.\nChairman Jerome Powell is slated to make remarks on Friday as part of the Fed’s summit. The Federal Reserve has been purchasing at least $120 billion of bonds per month to curb longer-term interest rates and jumpstart economic growth in reaction to the pandemic.\n“Expect investors to keep an eye on the Fed’s symposium the rest of this week for any comments about tapering or timing for interest rate hikes,” said Paulsen. “Either unexpected commentary from the Fed or a failure or success in scaling 4500 could bring additional volatility to the stock and bond markets.”\nSeveral companies report quarterly earnings on Thursday including Dell Technologies,Gap,HP and Abercrombie & Fitch.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":99,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9962022376,"gmtCreate":1669681846196,"gmtModify":1676538221973,"author":{"id":"3569303342488537","authorId":"3569303342488537","name":"ColeHii","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":1},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👍","listText":"👍","text":"👍","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":9,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9962022376","repostId":"2287251460","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2287251460","pubTimestamp":1669676011,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2287251460?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-11-29 06:53","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Elon Musk Calls Out Apple and CEO Tim Cook","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2287251460","media":"TheStreet","summary":"'It is in this context that Musk said on Nov. 28 that Apple  - Get Free Reporthad stopped running its ads on Twitter. He even went so far as to publicly challenge CEO Cook by name.\"Apple has mostly stopped advertising on Twitter,\" the billionaire wrote. \"Do they hate free speech in America?\" Musk asked.Apple didn't immediately respond to a request for comment.\"Apple has spent $40 million on Twitter advertising so far this year,\" which makes the tech giant \"one of Twitter’s top advertisers in 202","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>The game of hide and seek between Elon Musk and Apple is over.  The tensions between them are finally erupting in the public square.</p><p>For several months now the question was when Musk would declare war with the iPhone maker and CEO Tim Cook. It is now done.</p><p>Since Musk took over the social network Twitter  (<b>TWTR</b>) - Get Free Report, he&#39;s been trying to find new sources of revenue.</p><p>Meantime, he&#39;s facing a boycott from many advertisers, including General Motors  (<b>GM</b>) - Get Free Report, General Mills  (<b>GIS</b>) - Get Free Report, Pfizer  (<b>PFE</b>) - Get Free Report, and Stellantis  (<b>STLA</b>) - Get Free Report. These companies have paused their ads as they await the details of Musk&#39;s content-management plans for Twitter.</p><p>They fear that the social network will become a &#34;hellscape,&#34; following assertions by Musk, who defines himself as a free-speech absolutist. This means he considers any message on the platform acceptable so long as it does not violate the law of the country in which it is posted.</p><h2>Free Speech vs. Brand Safety</h2><p>Top advertisers are also worried about brand safety and a lack of clarity regarding advertising leadership at Twitter after Musk fired most of the site&#39;s executives.</p><p>&#34;Freedom of speech is the bedrock of a strong democracy and must take precedence,&#34; the billionaire argued on Nov. 25.</p><p>In the name of free speech, Musk has reactivated former President Donald Trump&#39;s account and accounts known for anti-transgender posts like those of the conservative satirical site Babylon Bee and the Canadian conservative psychologist Jordan Peterson.</p><p>Musk also announced a general amnesty for all banned accounts, after having organized a related survey on the platform.</p><p>&#34;The people have spoken,&#34; he wrote on Nov. 24. &#34;Amnesty begins next week. Vox Populi, Vox Dei.&#34;</p><h2>&#39;What&#39;s Going On?&#39;</h2><p>It is in this context that Musk said on Nov. 28 that Apple  (<b>AAPL</b>) - Get Free Report had stopped running its ads on Twitter. He even went so far as to publicly challenge CEO Cook by name.</p><p>&#34;Apple has mostly stopped advertising on Twitter,&#34; the billionaire wrote. &#34;Do they hate free speech in America?&#34;</p><p>A few minutes later he tweeted to Cook directly.</p><p>&#34;What’s going on here @tim_cook?&#34; Musk asked.</p><p>Apple didn&#39;t immediately respond to a request for comment.</p><p>&#34;Apple has spent $40 million on Twitter advertising so far this year,&#34; which makes the tech giant &#34;one of Twitter’s top advertisers in 2022, according to Mediaradar.</p><p>“Apple has been a major advertiser on Twitter and, even before Elon’s statement today, we’ve seen spend taper in recent months given continued controversy,” said Todd Krizelman, CEO of MediaRadar, the New York provider of advertising intelligence.</p><p>He added that Apple’s ad investment in Twitter represents most of its social ad spend overall. To date, 84% of Apple&#39;s total social-media spend has gone to Twitter.</p><p>Ad revenue made up more than 91% of Twitter&#39;s revenue in the second quarter, with the rest coming from subscriptions. Musk is trying to rebalance things, but the billionaire is aware that he needs advertisers. At the beginning of November he had threatened them that he was going to publicly shame them.</p><p>By first attacking Apple, the largest company in the world based on market value, the Techno King seems to want to send a message to other advertisers that he was not kidding.</p><p>Besides advertising, Musk and Apple are also in conflict over their approach to acceptable content.</p><p>As app distributors, Apple via the Apple Store and Alphabet&#39;s  (<b>GOOGL</b>) - Get Free Report Google via Google Play have strict policies regarding hateful speech.</p><p>&#34;When people install an app from the App Store, they want to feel confident that it’s safe to do so -- that the app doesn’t contain upsetting or offensive content, won’t damage their device, and isn’t likely to cause physical harm from its use,&#34; the iPhone maker says in the Apple Store guidelines. &#34;If you’re looking to shock and offend people, the App Store isn’t the right place for your app.&#34;</p><p>Phil Schiller, who is responsible for leading the App Store and Apple Events, left Twitter after Musk said he was reactivating Trump&#39;s account. Schiller didn&#39;t give an explanation for his decision to deactivate his account, but it&#39;s curious that it happened right after Musk&#39;s announcement.</p><p>Musk has threatened to make a phone if Apple and Alphabet blocked Twitter.</p></body></html>","source":"thestreet_highlight","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Elon Musk Calls Out Apple and CEO Tim Cook</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nElon Musk Calls Out Apple and CEO Tim Cook\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-11-29 06:53 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.thestreet.com/technology/elon-musk-calls-out-apple-tim-cook><strong>TheStreet</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The game of hide and seek between Elon Musk and Apple is over.  The tensions between them are finally erupting in the public square.For several months now the question was when Musk would declare war ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.thestreet.com/technology/elon-musk-calls-out-apple-tim-cook\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BK4581":"高盛持仓","LU0149725797.USD":"汇丰美国股市经济规模基金","LU0127658192.USD":"EASTSPRING INVESTMENTS GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY \"A\" (USD) ACC","IE00BKVL7J92.USD":"Legg Mason ClearBridge - US Equity Sustainability Leaders A Acc USD","AAPL":"苹果","LU1551013425.SGD":"Allianz Income and Growth Cl AMg2 DIS H2-SGD","IE00BJTD4N35.SGD":"Neuberger Berman US Long Short Equity A1  Acc SGD-H","IE0009356076.USD":"JANUS HENDERSON GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION \"A2\" (USD) ACC","IE00B7KXQ091.USD":"Janus Henderson Balanced A Inc USD","BK4099":"汽车制造商","BK4511":"特斯拉概念","LU0943347566.SGD":"安联收益及增长平衡基金AM H2-SGD","IE00BFSS7M15.SGD":"Janus Henderson Balanced A Acc SGD-H","LU0109391861.USD":"富兰克林美国机遇基金A Acc","IE00B3S45H60.SGD":"Neuberger Berman US Multicap Opportunities A Acc SGD-H","IE00B19Z9505.USD":"美盛-美国大盘成长股A Acc","LU0170899867.USD":"EASTSPRING INVESTMENTS WORLD VALUE EQUITY  \"A\" (USD) ACC","IE0004445239.USD":"JANUS HENDERSON US FORTY \"A2\" (USD) ACC","LU1861559042.SGD":"日兴方舟颠覆性创新基金B SGD","LU0417517546.SGD":"Allianz US Equity Cl AT Acc SGD","LU0053666078.USD":"摩根大通基金-美国股票A（离岸）美元","LU0642271901.SGD":"Janus Henderson Horizon Global Technology Leaders A2 SGD-H","BK4532":"文艺复兴科技持仓","LU0823411888.USD":"法巴消费创新基金 Cap","IE00BJTD4V19.USD":"NEUBERGER BERMAN US LONG SHORT EQUITY \"A1\" (USD) ACC","BK4515":"5G概念","LU1551013342.USD":"Allianz Income and Growth Cl AMg2 DIS USD","LU0056508442.USD":"贝莱德世界科技基金A2","LU0719512351.SGD":"JPMorgan Funds - US Technology A (acc) SGD","LU0640476718.USD":"THREADNEEDLE (LUX) US CONTRARIAN CORE EQ \"AU\" (USD) ACC","IE00BJJMRY28.SGD":"Janus Henderson Balanced A Inc SGD","BK4555":"新能源车","BK4533":"AQR资本管理(全球第二大对冲基金)","IE00BBT3K403.USD":"LEGG MASON CLEARBRIDGE TACTICAL DIVIDEND INCOME \"A(USD) ACC","LU1861220033.SGD":"Blackrock Next Generation Technology A2 SGD-H","IE00BSNM7G36.USD":"NEUBERGER BERMAN SYSTEMATIC GLOBAL SUSTAINABLE VALUE \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU0234572021.USD":"高盛美国核心股票组合Acc","LU0820561818.USD":"安联收益及增长平衡基金Cl AM DIS","LU2063271972.USD":"富兰克林创新领域基金","BK4559":"巴菲特持仓","BK4527":"明星科技股","LU0289961442.SGD":"SUSTAINABLE GLOBAL THEMATIC PORTFOLIO \"AX\" (SGD) ACC","LU0689472784.USD":"安联收益及增长基金Cl AM AT Acc","LU0320765059.SGD":"FTIF - Franklin US Opportunities A Acc SGD","LU1852331112.SGD":"Blackrock World Technology Fund A2 SGD-H","BK4574":"无人驾驶","LU0198837287.USD":"UBS (LUX) EQUITY SICAV - USA GROWTH \"P\" (USD) ACC","LU1861215975.USD":"贝莱德新一代科技基金 A2","BK4573":"虚拟现实","LU1861558580.USD":"日兴方舟颠覆性创新基金B"},"source_url":"https://www.thestreet.com/technology/elon-musk-calls-out-apple-tim-cook","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2287251460","content_text":"The game of hide and seek between Elon Musk and Apple is over.  The tensions between them are finally erupting in the public square.For several months now the question was when Musk would declare war with the iPhone maker and CEO Tim Cook. It is now done.Since Musk took over the social network Twitter  (TWTR) - Get Free Report, he's been trying to find new sources of revenue.Meantime, he's facing a boycott from many advertisers, including General Motors  (GM) - Get Free Report, General Mills  (GIS) - Get Free Report, Pfizer  (PFE) - Get Free Report, and Stellantis  (STLA) - Get Free Report. These companies have paused their ads as they await the details of Musk's content-management plans for Twitter.They fear that the social network will become a \"hellscape,\" following assertions by Musk, who defines himself as a free-speech absolutist. This means he considers any message on the platform acceptable so long as it does not violate the law of the country in which it is posted.Free Speech vs. Brand SafetyTop advertisers are also worried about brand safety and a lack of clarity regarding advertising leadership at Twitter after Musk fired most of the site's executives.\"Freedom of speech is the bedrock of a strong democracy and must take precedence,\" the billionaire argued on Nov. 25.In the name of free speech, Musk has reactivated former President Donald Trump's account and accounts known for anti-transgender posts like those of the conservative satirical site Babylon Bee and the Canadian conservative psychologist Jordan Peterson.Musk also announced a general amnesty for all banned accounts, after having organized a related survey on the platform.\"The people have spoken,\" he wrote on Nov. 24. \"Amnesty begins next week. Vox Populi, Vox Dei.\"'What's Going On?'It is in this context that Musk said on Nov. 28 that Apple  (AAPL) - Get Free Report had stopped running its ads on Twitter. He even went so far as to publicly challenge CEO Cook by name.\"Apple has mostly stopped advertising on Twitter,\" the billionaire wrote. \"Do they hate free speech in America?\"A few minutes later he tweeted to Cook directly.\"What’s going on here @tim_cook?\" Musk asked.Apple didn't immediately respond to a request for comment.\"Apple has spent $40 million on Twitter advertising so far this year,\" which makes the tech giant \"one of Twitter’s top advertisers in 2022, according to Mediaradar.“Apple has been a major advertiser on Twitter and, even before Elon’s statement today, we’ve seen spend taper in recent months given continued controversy,” said Todd Krizelman, CEO of MediaRadar, the New York provider of advertising intelligence.He added that Apple’s ad investment in Twitter represents most of its social ad spend overall. To date, 84% of Apple's total social-media spend has gone to Twitter.Ad revenue made up more than 91% of Twitter's revenue in the second quarter, with the rest coming from subscriptions. Musk is trying to rebalance things, but the billionaire is aware that he needs advertisers. At the beginning of November he had threatened them that he was going to publicly shame them.By first attacking Apple, the largest company in the world based on market value, the Techno King seems to want to send a message to other advertisers that he was not kidding.Besides advertising, Musk and Apple are also in conflict over their approach to acceptable content.As app distributors, Apple via the Apple Store and Alphabet's  (GOOGL) - Get Free Report Google via Google Play have strict policies regarding hateful speech.\"When people install an app from the App Store, they want to feel confident that it’s safe to do so -- that the app doesn’t contain upsetting or offensive content, won’t damage their device, and isn’t likely to cause physical harm from its use,\" the iPhone maker says in the Apple Store guidelines. \"If you’re looking to shock and offend people, the App Store isn’t the right place for your app.\"Phil Schiller, who is responsible for leading the App Store and Apple Events, left Twitter after Musk said he was reactivating Trump's account. Schiller didn't give an explanation for his decision to deactivate his account, but it's curious that it happened right after Musk's announcement.Musk has threatened to make a phone if Apple and Alphabet blocked Twitter.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":51,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9961966592,"gmtCreate":1668821306317,"gmtModify":1676538117761,"author":{"id":"3569303342488537","authorId":"3569303342488537","name":"ColeHii","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":1},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👍","listText":"👍","text":"👍","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":11,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9961966592","repostId":"2284706212","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2284706212","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1668806827,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2284706212?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-11-19 05:27","market":"us","language":"en","title":"US STOCKS-S&P 500 Ends Higher, Led By Defensive Shares","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2284706212","media":"Reuters","summary":"(Reuters) - Wall Street's benchmark S&P 500 index ended higher on Friday in a choppy trading session","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>(Reuters) - Wall Street&#39;s benchmark S&amp;P 500 index ended higher on Friday in a choppy trading session, as gains in defensive shares overshadowed energy declines, and investors shrugged off hawkish comments from Federal Reserve officials about interest rate hikes.</p><p>Federal Reserve Bank of Boston leader Susan Collins said that, with little evidence price pressures are waning, the Fed may need to deliver another 75-basis point rate hike as it seeks to get inflation under control.</p><p>On Thursday, St. Louis Fed President James Bullard set off equity declines when he said the Fed needs to keep raising interest rates given that its tightening so far &#34;had only limited effects on observed inflation.&#34;</p><p>With Collins and then Bullard &#34;we have had some very hawkish talk, but the market has really taken it in stride,&#34; said Keith Lerner, co-chief investment officer at Trust Advisory Services. &#34;It hasn’t hit the market to the downside like it has in the past.&#34;</p><p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 199.37 points, or 0.59%, to 33,745.69, the S&amp;P 500 gained 18.78 points, or 0.48%, to 3,965.34 and the Nasdaq Composite added 1.11 points, or 0.01%, to 11,146.06.</p><p>For the week, the S&amp;P 500 fell 0.7%, retreating modestly  after a strong month-long rally spurred by softer-than-expected inflation data that sparked hopes the central bank could temper its market-punishing rate hikes.</p><p>The Nasdaq fell 1.6% for the week, while the Dow was basically unchanged.</p><p>&#34;Markets are in a bit of a holding pattern&#34; ahead of employment and other economic data, said Lauren Goodwin, economist and portfolio strategist at New York Life Investments.</p><p>&#34;What is driving all equities of course is Fed policy and the gravitational force that rising interest rates have on the equity complex as a whole,&#34; Goodwin said. &#34;We are not likely to see any real evidence in terms of potentially declining wage pressure or inflation pressure for another couple of weeks.”</p><p>Defensive groups led the way among S&amp;P 500 sectors, with utilities up 2%, real estate rising 1.3% and healthcare 1.2% higher.</p><p>The energy sector fell 0.9%, as oil prices dropped, stemming from concern about weakened demand in China and further increases to U.S. interest rates.</p><p>In company news, shares of gay dating app Grindr skyrocketed about 214% in their market debut after the company completed its merger with a special-purpose acquisition company.</p><p>Gap Inc shares rose 7.6% after the company beat Wall Street estimates for quarterly sales and profit.</p><p>Shares of <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LYV\">Live Nation Entertainment</a> slumped 7.8% after The New York Times reported that the U.S. Justice Department was investigating whether the Ticketmaster parent had abused its power over the multibillion-dollar live music industry.</p><p>Advancing issues outnumbered declining ones on the NYSE by a 1.54-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 1.13-to-1 ratio favored advancers.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 posted 8 new 52-week highs and 3 new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 62 new highs and 141 new lows.</p><p>About 9.7 billion shares changed hands in U.S. exchanges, compared with the 12 billion daily average over the last 20 sessions.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>US STOCKS-S&P 500 Ends Higher, Led By Defensive Shares</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nUS STOCKS-S&P 500 Ends Higher, Led By Defensive Shares\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-11-19 05:27</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>(Reuters) - Wall Street&#39;s benchmark S&amp;P 500 index ended higher on Friday in a choppy trading session, as gains in defensive shares overshadowed energy declines, and investors shrugged off hawkish comments from Federal Reserve officials about interest rate hikes.</p><p>Federal Reserve Bank of Boston leader Susan Collins said that, with little evidence price pressures are waning, the Fed may need to deliver another 75-basis point rate hike as it seeks to get inflation under control.</p><p>On Thursday, St. Louis Fed President James Bullard set off equity declines when he said the Fed needs to keep raising interest rates given that its tightening so far &#34;had only limited effects on observed inflation.&#34;</p><p>With Collins and then Bullard &#34;we have had some very hawkish talk, but the market has really taken it in stride,&#34; said Keith Lerner, co-chief investment officer at Trust Advisory Services. &#34;It hasn’t hit the market to the downside like it has in the past.&#34;</p><p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 199.37 points, or 0.59%, to 33,745.69, the S&amp;P 500 gained 18.78 points, or 0.48%, to 3,965.34 and the Nasdaq Composite added 1.11 points, or 0.01%, to 11,146.06.</p><p>For the week, the S&amp;P 500 fell 0.7%, retreating modestly  after a strong month-long rally spurred by softer-than-expected inflation data that sparked hopes the central bank could temper its market-punishing rate hikes.</p><p>The Nasdaq fell 1.6% for the week, while the Dow was basically unchanged.</p><p>&#34;Markets are in a bit of a holding pattern&#34; ahead of employment and other economic data, said Lauren Goodwin, economist and portfolio strategist at New York Life Investments.</p><p>&#34;What is driving all equities of course is Fed policy and the gravitational force that rising interest rates have on the equity complex as a whole,&#34; Goodwin said. &#34;We are not likely to see any real evidence in terms of potentially declining wage pressure or inflation pressure for another couple of weeks.”</p><p>Defensive groups led the way among S&amp;P 500 sectors, with utilities up 2%, real estate rising 1.3% and healthcare 1.2% higher.</p><p>The energy sector fell 0.9%, as oil prices dropped, stemming from concern about weakened demand in China and further increases to U.S. interest rates.</p><p>In company news, shares of gay dating app Grindr skyrocketed about 214% in their market debut after the company completed its merger with a special-purpose acquisition company.</p><p>Gap Inc shares rose 7.6% after the company beat Wall Street estimates for quarterly sales and profit.</p><p>Shares of <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LYV\">Live Nation Entertainment</a> slumped 7.8% after The New York Times reported that the U.S. Justice Department was investigating whether the Ticketmaster parent had abused its power over the multibillion-dollar live music industry.</p><p>Advancing issues outnumbered declining ones on the NYSE by a 1.54-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 1.13-to-1 ratio favored advancers.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 posted 8 new 52-week highs and 3 new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 62 new highs and 141 new lows.</p><p>About 9.7 billion shares changed hands in U.S. exchanges, compared with the 12 billion daily average over the last 20 sessions.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2284706212","content_text":"(Reuters) - Wall Street's benchmark S&P 500 index ended higher on Friday in a choppy trading session, as gains in defensive shares overshadowed energy declines, and investors shrugged off hawkish comments from Federal Reserve officials about interest rate hikes.Federal Reserve Bank of Boston leader Susan Collins said that, with little evidence price pressures are waning, the Fed may need to deliver another 75-basis point rate hike as it seeks to get inflation under control.On Thursday, St. Louis Fed President James Bullard set off equity declines when he said the Fed needs to keep raising interest rates given that its tightening so far \"had only limited effects on observed inflation.\"With Collins and then Bullard \"we have had some very hawkish talk, but the market has really taken it in stride,\" said Keith Lerner, co-chief investment officer at Trust Advisory Services. \"It hasn’t hit the market to the downside like it has in the past.\"The Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 199.37 points, or 0.59%, to 33,745.69, the S&P 500 gained 18.78 points, or 0.48%, to 3,965.34 and the Nasdaq Composite added 1.11 points, or 0.01%, to 11,146.06.For the week, the S&P 500 fell 0.7%, retreating modestly  after a strong month-long rally spurred by softer-than-expected inflation data that sparked hopes the central bank could temper its market-punishing rate hikes.The Nasdaq fell 1.6% for the week, while the Dow was basically unchanged.\"Markets are in a bit of a holding pattern\" ahead of employment and other economic data, said Lauren Goodwin, economist and portfolio strategist at New York Life Investments.\"What is driving all equities of course is Fed policy and the gravitational force that rising interest rates have on the equity complex as a whole,\" Goodwin said. \"We are not likely to see any real evidence in terms of potentially declining wage pressure or inflation pressure for another couple of weeks.”Defensive groups led the way among S&P 500 sectors, with utilities up 2%, real estate rising 1.3% and healthcare 1.2% higher.The energy sector fell 0.9%, as oil prices dropped, stemming from concern about weakened demand in China and further increases to U.S. interest rates.In company news, shares of gay dating app Grindr skyrocketed about 214% in their market debut after the company completed its merger with a special-purpose acquisition company.Gap Inc shares rose 7.6% after the company beat Wall Street estimates for quarterly sales and profit.Shares of Live Nation Entertainment slumped 7.8% after The New York Times reported that the U.S. Justice Department was investigating whether the Ticketmaster parent had abused its power over the multibillion-dollar live music industry.Advancing issues outnumbered declining ones on the NYSE by a 1.54-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 1.13-to-1 ratio favored advancers.The S&P 500 posted 8 new 52-week highs and 3 new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 62 new highs and 141 new lows.About 9.7 billion shares changed hands in U.S. exchanges, compared with the 12 billion daily average over the last 20 sessions.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9076225737,"gmtCreate":1657854244029,"gmtModify":1676536073316,"author":{"id":"3569303342488537","authorId":"3569303342488537","name":"ColeHii","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":1},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👍","listText":"👍","text":"👍","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":9,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9076225737","repostId":"1161904983","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1161904983","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1657842124,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1161904983?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-07-15 07:42","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Fed Hawks Say They Want 75 Basis Point Rate Hike in July","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1161904983","media":"Reuters","summary":"(Reuters) - Two of the Federal Reserve's most hawkish policymakers on Thursday said they favored ano","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>(Reuters) - Two of the Federal Reserve&#39;s most hawkish policymakers on Thursday said they favored another 75-basis-point interest rate increase at the U.S. central bank&#39;s policy meeting this month, not the bigger rate hike traders had raced to price in after a report Wednesday showed inflation was accelerating.</p><p>The remarks from Fed Governor Christopher Waller and St. Louis Fed President James Bullard hit home, with markets swiftly reversing course to reflect the pair&#39;s preference, though still assigning about a 45% chance to a full percentage-point rate hike.</p><p>Waller, speaking at the Rocky Mountain Economic Summit in Victor, Idaho, said he would lean toward a larger hike if incoming data on retail sales or housing shows demand is not slowing fast enough to bring inflation down, or if inflation expectations worsened.</p><p>But, he said, &#34;markets may have gotten ahead of themselves a little bit yesterday.&#34;</p><p>Despite the &#34;major league disappointment&#34; of this week&#39;s report showing inflation rose 9.1% in June from a year earlier, an &#34;ugly&#34; number was what he had expected, and only cemented his own view that a 75-basis point rate hike at the Fed&#39;s July 26-27 meeting would be appropriate.</p><p>&#34;You don&#39;t want to, really, overdo the rate hikes,&#34; he said, noting that a three-quarters-percentage-point increase is still &#34;huge&#34; and shows the Fed is serious about bringing inflation back down to its 2% target.</p><p>&#34;Don&#39;t say, because you are not going to 100, you are not doing your job,&#34; he said.</p><p>Bullard, in an interview with Japanese financial newspaper Nikkei released on Thursday, also said that he does not back a larger increase for now.</p><p>&#34;So far, we&#39;ve framed this mostly as 50 versus 75 at this meeting,&#34; Bullard said. &#34;I think 75 has a lot of virtue to it.&#34;</p><p>Asked if the Fed&#39;s policy rate, currently in a range of 1.5-1.75%, could exceed 4% by year end, Bullard said: &#34;I suppose it&#39;s possible,&#34; but cautioned that would require data on inflation to continue coming in in &#34;an adverse way.&#34;</p><p>Waller likewise said further moves beyond July based on the data, adding that he would support restricting demand with further rate increases until core inflation, excluding volatile food and energy prices, starts to fall.</p><p>Because the labor market is very strong and data does not show signs of it weakening, he said a &#34;soft landing&#34; for the economy is &#34;very plausible&#34; and a recession -- inconceivable currently with the unemployment rate at 3.6%-- can be avoided.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Fed Hawks Say They Want 75 Basis Point Rate Hike in July</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFed Hawks Say They Want 75 Basis Point Rate Hike in July\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-07-15 07:42</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>(Reuters) - Two of the Federal Reserve&#39;s most hawkish policymakers on Thursday said they favored another 75-basis-point interest rate increase at the U.S. central bank&#39;s policy meeting this month, not the bigger rate hike traders had raced to price in after a report Wednesday showed inflation was accelerating.</p><p>The remarks from Fed Governor Christopher Waller and St. Louis Fed President James Bullard hit home, with markets swiftly reversing course to reflect the pair&#39;s preference, though still assigning about a 45% chance to a full percentage-point rate hike.</p><p>Waller, speaking at the Rocky Mountain Economic Summit in Victor, Idaho, said he would lean toward a larger hike if incoming data on retail sales or housing shows demand is not slowing fast enough to bring inflation down, or if inflation expectations worsened.</p><p>But, he said, &#34;markets may have gotten ahead of themselves a little bit yesterday.&#34;</p><p>Despite the &#34;major league disappointment&#34; of this week&#39;s report showing inflation rose 9.1% in June from a year earlier, an &#34;ugly&#34; number was what he had expected, and only cemented his own view that a 75-basis point rate hike at the Fed&#39;s July 26-27 meeting would be appropriate.</p><p>&#34;You don&#39;t want to, really, overdo the rate hikes,&#34; he said, noting that a three-quarters-percentage-point increase is still &#34;huge&#34; and shows the Fed is serious about bringing inflation back down to its 2% target.</p><p>&#34;Don&#39;t say, because you are not going to 100, you are not doing your job,&#34; he said.</p><p>Bullard, in an interview with Japanese financial newspaper Nikkei released on Thursday, also said that he does not back a larger increase for now.</p><p>&#34;So far, we&#39;ve framed this mostly as 50 versus 75 at this meeting,&#34; Bullard said. &#34;I think 75 has a lot of virtue to it.&#34;</p><p>Asked if the Fed&#39;s policy rate, currently in a range of 1.5-1.75%, could exceed 4% by year end, Bullard said: &#34;I suppose it&#39;s possible,&#34; but cautioned that would require data on inflation to continue coming in in &#34;an adverse way.&#34;</p><p>Waller likewise said further moves beyond July based on the data, adding that he would support restricting demand with further rate increases until core inflation, excluding volatile food and energy prices, starts to fall.</p><p>Because the labor market is very strong and data does not show signs of it weakening, he said a &#34;soft landing&#34; for the economy is &#34;very plausible&#34; and a recession -- inconceivable currently with the unemployment rate at 3.6%-- can be avoided.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1161904983","content_text":"(Reuters) - Two of the Federal Reserve's most hawkish policymakers on Thursday said they favored another 75-basis-point interest rate increase at the U.S. central bank's policy meeting this month, not the bigger rate hike traders had raced to price in after a report Wednesday showed inflation was accelerating.The remarks from Fed Governor Christopher Waller and St. Louis Fed President James Bullard hit home, with markets swiftly reversing course to reflect the pair's preference, though still assigning about a 45% chance to a full percentage-point rate hike.Waller, speaking at the Rocky Mountain Economic Summit in Victor, Idaho, said he would lean toward a larger hike if incoming data on retail sales or housing shows demand is not slowing fast enough to bring inflation down, or if inflation expectations worsened.But, he said, \"markets may have gotten ahead of themselves a little bit yesterday.\"Despite the \"major league disappointment\" of this week's report showing inflation rose 9.1% in June from a year earlier, an \"ugly\" number was what he had expected, and only cemented his own view that a 75-basis point rate hike at the Fed's July 26-27 meeting would be appropriate.\"You don't want to, really, overdo the rate hikes,\" he said, noting that a three-quarters-percentage-point increase is still \"huge\" and shows the Fed is serious about bringing inflation back down to its 2% target.\"Don't say, because you are not going to 100, you are not doing your job,\" he said.Bullard, in an interview with Japanese financial newspaper Nikkei released on Thursday, also said that he does not back a larger increase for now.\"So far, we've framed this mostly as 50 versus 75 at this meeting,\" Bullard said. \"I think 75 has a lot of virtue to it.\"Asked if the Fed's policy rate, currently in a range of 1.5-1.75%, could exceed 4% by year end, Bullard said: \"I suppose it's possible,\" but cautioned that would require data on inflation to continue coming in in \"an adverse way.\"Waller likewise said further moves beyond July based on the data, adding that he would support restricting demand with further rate increases until core inflation, excluding volatile food and energy prices, starts to fall.Because the labor market is very strong and data does not show signs of it weakening, he said a \"soft landing\" for the economy is \"very plausible\" and a recession -- inconceivable currently with the unemployment rate at 3.6%-- can be avoided.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":8,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":810505412,"gmtCreate":1629985119536,"gmtModify":1676530192486,"author":{"id":"3569303342488537","authorId":"3569303342488537","name":"ColeHii","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":1},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hi","listText":"Hi","text":"Hi","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":11,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/810505412","repostId":"1120391898","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9925836211,"gmtCreate":1671982446034,"gmtModify":1676538617781,"author":{"id":"3569303342488537","authorId":"3569303342488537","name":"ColeHii","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":1},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👍","listText":"👍","text":"👍","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":10,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9925836211","repostId":"1192326933","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1192326933","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1672011741,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1192326933?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-12-26 07:42","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Reminder: U.S. Market Will be Closed for Christmas Day on Monday, 26 December 2022","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1192326933","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"U.S. ChristmasDay hasarrived. The U.S. market will be closed on Monday, 26 December 2022. Please take note of the trading arrangements during the holiday period and make the necessary preparations in ","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f9c0d643f9647f8bf16257138dcbed8a\" tg-width=\"1200\" tg-height=\"602\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>U.S. Christmas Day has arrived. The U.S. market will be closed on Monday, 26 December 2022. Please take note of the trading arrangements during the holiday period and make the necessary preparations in advance.</p><p>The Singapore market will be closed at local time on Monday, 26 December 2022.</p><p>The Hong Kong market will be closed at local time on Monday, 26 December 2022 and Tuesday, 27 December 2022.</p><p>The Australian market will be closed at local time on Monday, 26 December 2022 and Tuesday, 27 December 2022 in addition to the Boxing Day.</p><p>The New Zealand market will be closed at local time on Monday, 26 December 2022 and Tuesday, 27 December 2022 in addition to the Boxing Day.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Reminder: U.S. Market Will be Closed for Christmas Day on Monday, 26 December 2022</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nReminder: U.S. Market Will be Closed for Christmas Day on Monday, 26 December 2022\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-12-26 07:42</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f9c0d643f9647f8bf16257138dcbed8a\" tg-width=\"1200\" tg-height=\"602\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>U.S. Christmas Day has arrived. The U.S. market will be closed on Monday, 26 December 2022. Please take note of the trading arrangements during the holiday period and make the necessary preparations in advance.</p><p>The Singapore market will be closed at local time on Monday, 26 December 2022.</p><p>The Hong Kong market will be closed at local time on Monday, 26 December 2022 and Tuesday, 27 December 2022.</p><p>The Australian market will be closed at local time on Monday, 26 December 2022 and Tuesday, 27 December 2022 in addition to the Boxing Day.</p><p>The New Zealand market will be closed at local time on Monday, 26 December 2022 and Tuesday, 27 December 2022 in addition to the Boxing Day.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1192326933","content_text":"U.S. Christmas Day has arrived. The U.S. market will be closed on Monday, 26 December 2022. Please take note of the trading arrangements during the holiday period and make the necessary preparations in advance.The Singapore market will be closed at local time on Monday, 26 December 2022.The Hong Kong market will be closed at local time on Monday, 26 December 2022 and Tuesday, 27 December 2022.The Australian market will be closed at local time on Monday, 26 December 2022 and Tuesday, 27 December 2022 in addition to the Boxing Day.The New Zealand market will be closed at local time on Monday, 26 December 2022 and Tuesday, 27 December 2022 in addition to the Boxing Day.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":91,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9928040897,"gmtCreate":1671155181020,"gmtModify":1676538500285,"author":{"id":"3569303342488537","authorId":"3569303342488537","name":"ColeHii","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":1},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👍","listText":"👍","text":"👍","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":8,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9928040897","repostId":"2291153000","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2291153000","pubTimestamp":1671152835,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2291153000?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-12-16 09:07","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Stock Market Traders Discover That Bad News Is Bad After All","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2291153000","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"Concern is growth and what will happen to economy: MahajanThe bottom isn’t in yet for the market, sa","content":"<html><head></head><body><ul><li>Concern is growth and what will happen to economy: Mahajan</li><li>The bottom isn’t in yet for the market, says Lovell at UBS</li></ul><p>Order is being restored in financial markets, a frightening development for equity bulls.</p><p>For the first time in a long time, news that was bad for the economy was bad for the stock market as well, more proof that recession fear has replaced inflation angst as that market’s biggest bugaboo. That bonds took the news in stride is nice for investors with a toe in each market, but adds to evidence that concern about the economy has become the bigger input to both.</p><p>Rather than rise on speculation that weak data would curb Federal Reserve tightening, the S&amp;P 500 dropped 2.5% on Thursday, while the Nasdaq 100 lost 3.4%. Small-cap stocks lost more than 2.5% and the VIX volatility gauge shot back above 22. The yield on 10-year Treasuries hovered around 3.45%, down from a peak of 3.63% earlier this week.</p><p>“The concern is growth and what’s going to happen to the economy, and is the Fed pushing us into recession,” Mona Mahajan, senior investment strategist at Edward Jones, said on Bloomberg’s “What Goes Up” podcast on Thursday. “Markets won’t ignore the fact that we’re entering a downturn — and so could we head back toward those lows, give up some of the gains that we’ve seen recently? We think that is certainly a scenario that is a credible one.”</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/53d23fd0d5e7c8cff39bf6af275f2547\" tg-width=\"930\" tg-height=\"523\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>In months prior, bad economic news was often taken as good by investors because it suggested the Federal Reserve’s interest-rate increases were working as intended to cool the economy and tamp down inflation. But now a shift may be at hand: Many investors are worrying more about a recession in 2023, with the risk increasing that the Fed could overtighten.</p><p>Data Thursday suggested US economic growth is slowing, with retail sales and manufacturing dropping last month, though the labor market has remained strong. Retail sales fell in November by the most in nearly a year, calling into question the health of the consumer, while several factory measures also showed contraction, burdened by weaker demand, among other things. Meanwhile, regional Federal Reserve banks data showed that manufacturing weakened in both the New York and Philadelphia regions by more than expected — the latter’s new orders gauge fell to the lowest since the onset of the pandemic.</p><p>“Investors took their eye off the ball and were hoping for a glide path into the holidays,” said Mike Bailey, director of research at FBB Capital Partners. “Markets are realizing that we are in for a staring contest between Jay Powell and investors that could go on for three, six, or nine months.” He added that yields on short-term Treasuries rose Thursday, while those on longer-term ones declined, “which would support a theme of a hawkish Fed move near-term, pushing rates up, but also leading to perhaps a worse recession, which might suggest slower long-term growth and lower long rates.”</p><p>The iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF, known by its ticker TLT, is on pace to beat the SPDR S&amp;P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) for five straight weeks, the longest winning streak since March of 2020. The Treasury fund is outperforming the latter by nearly 10 percentage points in December, poised for its best month since that period as well.</p><p>On Wednesday, the Fed raised its benchmark rate by 50 basis points to a 4.25%-to-4.5% target range and policymakers predicted rates would end next year at 5.1%, a higher level than previously indicated. Chair Jerome Powell reiterated that the central bank would keep rates higher for longer, and played down hopes for a rate cut next year.</p><p>The Fed also, among other projections, updated its forecast for the unemployment rate, saying it could rise to 4.6% next year — and such a hike from July’s trough of 3.5% “has never not caused a recession,” wrote Julian Emanuel, chief equity, derivatives and quantitative strategist at Evercore ISI, who added that no bear market has ever bottomed before a recession has started. Emanuel recommends a defensive position as the first half of 2023 could remain volatile still.</p><p>“The pullback in the market today — we aren’t surprised by it,” Nadia Lovell, UBS Global Wealth Management senior US equity strategist, told Bloomberg Television on Thursday. “This is a market that has traded on the hope that the Fed will not do what they say they will do. Yesterday they sent a clearly different message.”</p><p>“The risk is to the upside. That is what the market is grappling with today,” Lovell added. “We don’t yet think the bottom is into this market. You’ll probably see it in the first half of the year.”</p></body></html>","source":"lsy1584095487587","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Stock Market Traders Discover That Bad News Is Bad After All</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nStock Market Traders Discover That Bad News Is Bad After All\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-12-16 09:07 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-12-15/stock-market-traders-discover-that-bad-news-is-bad-after-all?srnd=premium><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Concern is growth and what will happen to economy: MahajanThe bottom isn’t in yet for the market, says Lovell at UBSOrder is being restored in financial markets, a frightening development for equity ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-12-15/stock-market-traders-discover-that-bad-news-is-bad-after-all?srnd=premium\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","BK4111":"出版","BK4585":"ETF&股票定投概念","BK4166":"消费信贷"},"source_url":"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-12-15/stock-market-traders-discover-that-bad-news-is-bad-after-all?srnd=premium","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2291153000","content_text":"Concern is growth and what will happen to economy: MahajanThe bottom isn’t in yet for the market, says Lovell at UBSOrder is being restored in financial markets, a frightening development for equity bulls.For the first time in a long time, news that was bad for the economy was bad for the stock market as well, more proof that recession fear has replaced inflation angst as that market’s biggest bugaboo. That bonds took the news in stride is nice for investors with a toe in each market, but adds to evidence that concern about the economy has become the bigger input to both.Rather than rise on speculation that weak data would curb Federal Reserve tightening, the S&P 500 dropped 2.5% on Thursday, while the Nasdaq 100 lost 3.4%. Small-cap stocks lost more than 2.5% and the VIX volatility gauge shot back above 22. The yield on 10-year Treasuries hovered around 3.45%, down from a peak of 3.63% earlier this week.“The concern is growth and what’s going to happen to the economy, and is the Fed pushing us into recession,” Mona Mahajan, senior investment strategist at Edward Jones, said on Bloomberg’s “What Goes Up” podcast on Thursday. “Markets won’t ignore the fact that we’re entering a downturn — and so could we head back toward those lows, give up some of the gains that we’ve seen recently? We think that is certainly a scenario that is a credible one.”In months prior, bad economic news was often taken as good by investors because it suggested the Federal Reserve’s interest-rate increases were working as intended to cool the economy and tamp down inflation. But now a shift may be at hand: Many investors are worrying more about a recession in 2023, with the risk increasing that the Fed could overtighten.Data Thursday suggested US economic growth is slowing, with retail sales and manufacturing dropping last month, though the labor market has remained strong. Retail sales fell in November by the most in nearly a year, calling into question the health of the consumer, while several factory measures also showed contraction, burdened by weaker demand, among other things. Meanwhile, regional Federal Reserve banks data showed that manufacturing weakened in both the New York and Philadelphia regions by more than expected — the latter’s new orders gauge fell to the lowest since the onset of the pandemic.“Investors took their eye off the ball and were hoping for a glide path into the holidays,” said Mike Bailey, director of research at FBB Capital Partners. “Markets are realizing that we are in for a staring contest between Jay Powell and investors that could go on for three, six, or nine months.” He added that yields on short-term Treasuries rose Thursday, while those on longer-term ones declined, “which would support a theme of a hawkish Fed move near-term, pushing rates up, but also leading to perhaps a worse recession, which might suggest slower long-term growth and lower long rates.”The iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF, known by its ticker TLT, is on pace to beat the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) for five straight weeks, the longest winning streak since March of 2020. The Treasury fund is outperforming the latter by nearly 10 percentage points in December, poised for its best month since that period as well.On Wednesday, the Fed raised its benchmark rate by 50 basis points to a 4.25%-to-4.5% target range and policymakers predicted rates would end next year at 5.1%, a higher level than previously indicated. Chair Jerome Powell reiterated that the central bank would keep rates higher for longer, and played down hopes for a rate cut next year.The Fed also, among other projections, updated its forecast for the unemployment rate, saying it could rise to 4.6% next year — and such a hike from July’s trough of 3.5% “has never not caused a recession,” wrote Julian Emanuel, chief equity, derivatives and quantitative strategist at Evercore ISI, who added that no bear market has ever bottomed before a recession has started. Emanuel recommends a defensive position as the first half of 2023 could remain volatile still.“The pullback in the market today — we aren’t surprised by it,” Nadia Lovell, UBS Global Wealth Management senior US equity strategist, told Bloomberg Television on Thursday. “This is a market that has traded on the hope that the Fed will not do what they say they will do. Yesterday they sent a clearly different message.”“The risk is to the upside. That is what the market is grappling with today,” Lovell added. “We don’t yet think the bottom is into this market. You’ll probably see it in the first half of the year.”","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":75,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9981368836,"gmtCreate":1666402465826,"gmtModify":1676537752257,"author":{"id":"3569303342488537","authorId":"3569303342488537","name":"ColeHii","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":1},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👍","listText":"👍","text":"👍","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":8,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9981368836","repostId":"2277025934","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2277025934","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1666400250,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2277025934?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-10-22 08:57","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Fed's Rate Debate Shifts to How, and When, to Slow Down","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2277025934","media":"Reuters","summary":"(Reuters) - The Federal Reserve, set to approve another large interest rate increase early next mont","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>(Reuters) - The Federal Reserve, set to approve another large interest rate increase early next month, is shifting to a debate over how much higher it can safely push borrowing costs and how and when to slow the pace of future increases.</p><p>The U.S. central bank is likely to provide a signal at its Nov. 1-2 policy meeting as officials weigh what some see as growing risks to economic growth against a lack of obvious progress in lowering inflation from its pandemic-related surge.</p><p>&#34;This debate about exactly where we should go, and then become more data-dependent, is going to heat up in the last part of the year here,&#34; St. Louis Fed President James Bullard said in a Reuters interview last week.</p><p>San Francisco Fed President Mary Daly added her voice to that debate on Friday during an event in Monterey, California. While acknowledging that high inflation made it &#34;really challenging&#34; for the central bank to step down from its rate hikes, Daly said &#34;the time is now to start talking about stepping down. The time is now to start planning for stepping down.&#34;</p><p>Investors widely expect the Fed next month to raise its benchmark overnight interest rate by three-quarters of a percentage point for a fourth consecutive time, lifting it to a range of 3.75% to 4.00%.</p><p>Yet even as markets point to another large increase at the final policy meeting of the year in December, sentiment is building within the Fed to take a breather. While the process of raising interest rates is not yet finished, policymakers feel they may be at the point where further increases can be smaller in size, and are close to where they can pause altogether in order to take stock as the economy adjusts to the rapid change in credit conditions the central bank has set in motion.</p><p>That advice has been subtle: In a speech earlier this month, Fed Vice Chair Lael Brainard offered a list of reasons to be cautious about further tightening without overtly calling for a slowdown or pause.</p><p>It also has been blunt: In comments this week in Virginia, Chicago Fed President Charles Evans warned of outsized &#34;nonlinear&#34; risks to the economy if the federal funds rate is lifted much beyond the 4.6% level officials projected in September that they would reach next year.</p><p>&#34;It really does begin to weigh on the economy,&#34; Evans said. Even with the existing rate outlook, it was a &#34;closer call than normal&#34; whether recession can be avoided.</p><p>With that view becoming more full-throated, and more economists saying a U.S. recession is likely next year, the November meeting may well be when the Fed signals it is time to slow down - a moment Fed Chair Jerome Powell said in a Sept. 21 news conference would be approaching &#34;at some point.&#34;</p><p>Powell has not spoken publicly about monetary policy since then.</p><p><b>INFLATION SURPRISES</b></p><p>Data on inflation has offered little relief to the Fed. Headline consumer prices rose in September at an 8.2% annual rate. The U.S. central bank uses a different inflation measure for its 2% inflation target, but that remains roughly three times the target.</p><p>Job growth continues to be strong, with a still-outsized number of vacancies compared to the number of jobseekers. Employers say it remains difficult to find workers.</p><p>Yet even some of the Fed&#39;s most hawkish voices appear ready to let the economy have time to catch up with the monetary tightening already underway.</p><p>Bullard told Reuters he also sees a federal funds rate of around 4.6% as a point to pause and take stock, though he&#39;d prefer to get there by the end of this year with two more 75-basis-point increases and then let policy evolve in 2023 based on how inflation behaves.</p><p>Expectations at the Fed about inflation have begun to settle around three key points that both buttress the calls for caution on further rate hikes, but also leave policymakers wanting to keep their options open.</p><p>Inflation, officials acknowledge, has become broader and more persistent than anticipated, and may be slow to decline. Consumer prices are weighted towards rents, which are slow to change, and much of the current inflation is coming from service industries where price changes are harder to influence.</p><p>In economic projections released by the Fed in September, a version of policymakers&#39; preferred measure of inflation was seen ending 2023 above 3%. Recent staff estimates, recounted in the minutes of the last Fed meeting, indicated the economy may be much &#34;tighter&#34; than anticipated as high demand strains against potential output that may be more limited than thought.</p><p>But policymakers also agree the full impact of their rate hikes may not become clear for months, even as data is starting to show the seeds of an inflation slowdown taking root. Vehicle prices that drove the inflation surge in the early part of the pandemic are falling, and industry executives expect more; month-to-month data show rents are coming down and the housing industry, a barometer of other household spending, is slowing rapidly as the average rate on a 30-year fixed mortgage nears 7%.</p><p>Yet, in another point of agreement, risk sentiment among Fed officials is almost uniformly tilted towards the likelihood of more inflation surprises to come, putting the group on what some have described as a hope-for-the-best-prepare-for-the-worst footing. In September, 17 of 19 officials saw inflation risks as &#34;weighted to the upside.&#34;</p><p>In that situation, even if policymakers are ready to be done with the 75-basis-point rate increases, they won&#39;t want the public to equate smaller future hikes with a true policy &#34;pivot&#34; or a softened stance on inflation - a tricky point to communicate.</p><p>Even more dovish officials like Evans agree monetary policy needs to hit a more restrictive level and stay there until the back of inflation is broken. Others agree even if the Fed slows to half-percentage-point increases after next month&#39;s meeting, that remains fast by recent standards and could quickly push the federal funds rate to a level of 5% or higher, more in line with rate-hiking cycles since the 1990s and a level some economists see as needed before the Fed&#39;s work is done.</p><p>&#34;How do you step down without giving external observers, financial markets, the wrong impression?&#34; Evans said. &#34;I think that puts a premium on explaining where we think we are, what we&#39;re expecting inflation to be doing, and when you&#39;re going to be willing to say &#39;I think I&#39;ve got the level of the funds rate that is adequately restrictive in order to be consistent with inflation coming down.&#39; It&#39;s hard. That&#39;s a hard discussion.&#34;</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Fed's Rate Debate Shifts to How, and When, to Slow Down</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFed's Rate Debate Shifts to How, and When, to Slow Down\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-10-22 08:57</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>(Reuters) - The Federal Reserve, set to approve another large interest rate increase early next month, is shifting to a debate over how much higher it can safely push borrowing costs and how and when to slow the pace of future increases.</p><p>The U.S. central bank is likely to provide a signal at its Nov. 1-2 policy meeting as officials weigh what some see as growing risks to economic growth against a lack of obvious progress in lowering inflation from its pandemic-related surge.</p><p>&#34;This debate about exactly where we should go, and then become more data-dependent, is going to heat up in the last part of the year here,&#34; St. Louis Fed President James Bullard said in a Reuters interview last week.</p><p>San Francisco Fed President Mary Daly added her voice to that debate on Friday during an event in Monterey, California. While acknowledging that high inflation made it &#34;really challenging&#34; for the central bank to step down from its rate hikes, Daly said &#34;the time is now to start talking about stepping down. The time is now to start planning for stepping down.&#34;</p><p>Investors widely expect the Fed next month to raise its benchmark overnight interest rate by three-quarters of a percentage point for a fourth consecutive time, lifting it to a range of 3.75% to 4.00%.</p><p>Yet even as markets point to another large increase at the final policy meeting of the year in December, sentiment is building within the Fed to take a breather. While the process of raising interest rates is not yet finished, policymakers feel they may be at the point where further increases can be smaller in size, and are close to where they can pause altogether in order to take stock as the economy adjusts to the rapid change in credit conditions the central bank has set in motion.</p><p>That advice has been subtle: In a speech earlier this month, Fed Vice Chair Lael Brainard offered a list of reasons to be cautious about further tightening without overtly calling for a slowdown or pause.</p><p>It also has been blunt: In comments this week in Virginia, Chicago Fed President Charles Evans warned of outsized &#34;nonlinear&#34; risks to the economy if the federal funds rate is lifted much beyond the 4.6% level officials projected in September that they would reach next year.</p><p>&#34;It really does begin to weigh on the economy,&#34; Evans said. Even with the existing rate outlook, it was a &#34;closer call than normal&#34; whether recession can be avoided.</p><p>With that view becoming more full-throated, and more economists saying a U.S. recession is likely next year, the November meeting may well be when the Fed signals it is time to slow down - a moment Fed Chair Jerome Powell said in a Sept. 21 news conference would be approaching &#34;at some point.&#34;</p><p>Powell has not spoken publicly about monetary policy since then.</p><p><b>INFLATION SURPRISES</b></p><p>Data on inflation has offered little relief to the Fed. Headline consumer prices rose in September at an 8.2% annual rate. The U.S. central bank uses a different inflation measure for its 2% inflation target, but that remains roughly three times the target.</p><p>Job growth continues to be strong, with a still-outsized number of vacancies compared to the number of jobseekers. Employers say it remains difficult to find workers.</p><p>Yet even some of the Fed&#39;s most hawkish voices appear ready to let the economy have time to catch up with the monetary tightening already underway.</p><p>Bullard told Reuters he also sees a federal funds rate of around 4.6% as a point to pause and take stock, though he&#39;d prefer to get there by the end of this year with two more 75-basis-point increases and then let policy evolve in 2023 based on how inflation behaves.</p><p>Expectations at the Fed about inflation have begun to settle around three key points that both buttress the calls for caution on further rate hikes, but also leave policymakers wanting to keep their options open.</p><p>Inflation, officials acknowledge, has become broader and more persistent than anticipated, and may be slow to decline. Consumer prices are weighted towards rents, which are slow to change, and much of the current inflation is coming from service industries where price changes are harder to influence.</p><p>In economic projections released by the Fed in September, a version of policymakers&#39; preferred measure of inflation was seen ending 2023 above 3%. Recent staff estimates, recounted in the minutes of the last Fed meeting, indicated the economy may be much &#34;tighter&#34; than anticipated as high demand strains against potential output that may be more limited than thought.</p><p>But policymakers also agree the full impact of their rate hikes may not become clear for months, even as data is starting to show the seeds of an inflation slowdown taking root. Vehicle prices that drove the inflation surge in the early part of the pandemic are falling, and industry executives expect more; month-to-month data show rents are coming down and the housing industry, a barometer of other household spending, is slowing rapidly as the average rate on a 30-year fixed mortgage nears 7%.</p><p>Yet, in another point of agreement, risk sentiment among Fed officials is almost uniformly tilted towards the likelihood of more inflation surprises to come, putting the group on what some have described as a hope-for-the-best-prepare-for-the-worst footing. In September, 17 of 19 officials saw inflation risks as &#34;weighted to the upside.&#34;</p><p>In that situation, even if policymakers are ready to be done with the 75-basis-point rate increases, they won&#39;t want the public to equate smaller future hikes with a true policy &#34;pivot&#34; or a softened stance on inflation - a tricky point to communicate.</p><p>Even more dovish officials like Evans agree monetary policy needs to hit a more restrictive level and stay there until the back of inflation is broken. Others agree even if the Fed slows to half-percentage-point increases after next month&#39;s meeting, that remains fast by recent standards and could quickly push the federal funds rate to a level of 5% or higher, more in line with rate-hiking cycles since the 1990s and a level some economists see as needed before the Fed&#39;s work is done.</p><p>&#34;How do you step down without giving external observers, financial markets, the wrong impression?&#34; Evans said. &#34;I think that puts a premium on explaining where we think we are, what we&#39;re expecting inflation to be doing, and when you&#39;re going to be willing to say &#39;I think I&#39;ve got the level of the funds rate that is adequately restrictive in order to be consistent with inflation coming down.&#39; It&#39;s hard. That&#39;s a hard discussion.&#34;</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2277025934","content_text":"(Reuters) - The Federal Reserve, set to approve another large interest rate increase early next month, is shifting to a debate over how much higher it can safely push borrowing costs and how and when to slow the pace of future increases.The U.S. central bank is likely to provide a signal at its Nov. 1-2 policy meeting as officials weigh what some see as growing risks to economic growth against a lack of obvious progress in lowering inflation from its pandemic-related surge.\"This debate about exactly where we should go, and then become more data-dependent, is going to heat up in the last part of the year here,\" St. Louis Fed President James Bullard said in a Reuters interview last week.San Francisco Fed President Mary Daly added her voice to that debate on Friday during an event in Monterey, California. While acknowledging that high inflation made it \"really challenging\" for the central bank to step down from its rate hikes, Daly said \"the time is now to start talking about stepping down. The time is now to start planning for stepping down.\"Investors widely expect the Fed next month to raise its benchmark overnight interest rate by three-quarters of a percentage point for a fourth consecutive time, lifting it to a range of 3.75% to 4.00%.Yet even as markets point to another large increase at the final policy meeting of the year in December, sentiment is building within the Fed to take a breather. While the process of raising interest rates is not yet finished, policymakers feel they may be at the point where further increases can be smaller in size, and are close to where they can pause altogether in order to take stock as the economy adjusts to the rapid change in credit conditions the central bank has set in motion.That advice has been subtle: In a speech earlier this month, Fed Vice Chair Lael Brainard offered a list of reasons to be cautious about further tightening without overtly calling for a slowdown or pause.It also has been blunt: In comments this week in Virginia, Chicago Fed President Charles Evans warned of outsized \"nonlinear\" risks to the economy if the federal funds rate is lifted much beyond the 4.6% level officials projected in September that they would reach next year.\"It really does begin to weigh on the economy,\" Evans said. Even with the existing rate outlook, it was a \"closer call than normal\" whether recession can be avoided.With that view becoming more full-throated, and more economists saying a U.S. recession is likely next year, the November meeting may well be when the Fed signals it is time to slow down - a moment Fed Chair Jerome Powell said in a Sept. 21 news conference would be approaching \"at some point.\"Powell has not spoken publicly about monetary policy since then.INFLATION SURPRISESData on inflation has offered little relief to the Fed. Headline consumer prices rose in September at an 8.2% annual rate. The U.S. central bank uses a different inflation measure for its 2% inflation target, but that remains roughly three times the target.Job growth continues to be strong, with a still-outsized number of vacancies compared to the number of jobseekers. Employers say it remains difficult to find workers.Yet even some of the Fed's most hawkish voices appear ready to let the economy have time to catch up with the monetary tightening already underway.Bullard told Reuters he also sees a federal funds rate of around 4.6% as a point to pause and take stock, though he'd prefer to get there by the end of this year with two more 75-basis-point increases and then let policy evolve in 2023 based on how inflation behaves.Expectations at the Fed about inflation have begun to settle around three key points that both buttress the calls for caution on further rate hikes, but also leave policymakers wanting to keep their options open.Inflation, officials acknowledge, has become broader and more persistent than anticipated, and may be slow to decline. Consumer prices are weighted towards rents, which are slow to change, and much of the current inflation is coming from service industries where price changes are harder to influence.In economic projections released by the Fed in September, a version of policymakers' preferred measure of inflation was seen ending 2023 above 3%. Recent staff estimates, recounted in the minutes of the last Fed meeting, indicated the economy may be much \"tighter\" than anticipated as high demand strains against potential output that may be more limited than thought.But policymakers also agree the full impact of their rate hikes may not become clear for months, even as data is starting to show the seeds of an inflation slowdown taking root. Vehicle prices that drove the inflation surge in the early part of the pandemic are falling, and industry executives expect more; month-to-month data show rents are coming down and the housing industry, a barometer of other household spending, is slowing rapidly as the average rate on a 30-year fixed mortgage nears 7%.Yet, in another point of agreement, risk sentiment among Fed officials is almost uniformly tilted towards the likelihood of more inflation surprises to come, putting the group on what some have described as a hope-for-the-best-prepare-for-the-worst footing. In September, 17 of 19 officials saw inflation risks as \"weighted to the upside.\"In that situation, even if policymakers are ready to be done with the 75-basis-point rate increases, they won't want the public to equate smaller future hikes with a true policy \"pivot\" or a softened stance on inflation - a tricky point to communicate.Even more dovish officials like Evans agree monetary policy needs to hit a more restrictive level and stay there until the back of inflation is broken. Others agree even if the Fed slows to half-percentage-point increases after next month's meeting, that remains fast by recent standards and could quickly push the federal funds rate to a level of 5% or higher, more in line with rate-hiking cycles since the 1990s and a level some economists see as needed before the Fed's work is done.\"How do you step down without giving external observers, financial markets, the wrong impression?\" Evans said. \"I think that puts a premium on explaining where we think we are, what we're expecting inflation to be doing, and when you're going to be willing to say 'I think I've got the level of the funds rate that is adequately restrictive in order to be consistent with inflation coming down.' It's hard. That's a hard discussion.\"","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":52,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}