leejk personal page - To The Moon

leejk

leejk

No personal profile

313Follow

10Followers

0Topic

0Badge

2022-08-12

$Smith And Wesson Brands Inc(SWBI)$U

2022-05-18

Thanks

Powell Says Fed Has Resolve to Bring U.S. Inflation Down

2022-05-29

Thanks

$250 Billion in "Rebalancing" Inflows Could Rescue Stocks By the End of June, JPMorgan Says

2022-01-20

Thanks

US STOCKS-Wall Street Sell-Off Deepens, Nasdaq Confirms Correction

2022-06-22

$YANGZIJIANG SHIPBLDG HLDGS LTD(BS6.SI)$I

2022-03-31

Thanks

Why Cathie Wood Just Dumped Tesla for This Hot EV Stock

2022-01-26

Thanks

Wall Street Ends down as Markets Whipsaw Ahead of Fed Meeting

2022-05-22

Thanks

It's Down Almost 40% Year to Date -- Should Investors Buy Tesla Stock?

2022-05-14

Thanks

Will the LUNA Crypto Recover? What Analysts Are Saying About the Future of Terra

2022-04-19

$FRENCKEN GROUP LIMITED(E28.SI)$Hmmm

2022-08-13

$META 20220812 155.0 PUT$H

2022-06-23

$VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF(SMH)$H

2022-06-14

$Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF(SOXQ)$H

2022-05-17

Thanks

Opinion: A Smart Way to Play Tesla’s Big Stock-Market Swings Using Options

2022-04-29

$Smith And Wesson Brands Inc(SWBI)$Thank

2022-04-22

$Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF(SOXQ)$Omg

2022-09-06

$Tesla Motors(TSLA)$H

2022-08-28

$CapitaLandInves(9CI.SI)$J

2022-08-17

$IFAST CORPORATION LTD.(AIY.SI)$H

2022-07-25

$Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF(SOXQ)$H

Go to Tiger App to see more news

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"userPageInfo":{"id":3569553993868964,"uuid":"3569553993868964","gmtCreate":1606465180509,"gmtModify":1634520406450,"name":"leejk","pinyin":"leejk","introduction":"","introductionEn":"","signature":"","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13d40c01a9eef0aa4dc0a703e255de7a","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":10,"headSize":313,"tweetSize":440,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":3,"name":"书生虎","nameTw":"書生虎","represent":"努力向上","factor":"发布10条非转发主帖,其中5条获得他人回复或点赞","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":"success","userBadges":[{"badgeId":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493-2","templateUuid":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493","name":"Senior Tiger","description":"Join the tiger community for 1000 days","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0063fb68ea29c9ae6858c58630e182d5","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/96c699a93be4214d4b49aea6a5a5d1a4","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/35b0e542a9ff77046ed69ef602bc105d","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.08.25","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"44212b71d0be4ec88898348dbe882e03-2","templateUuid":"44212b71d0be4ec88898348dbe882e03","name":"Executive Tiger","description":"The transaction amount of the securities account reaches $300,000","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9d20b23f1b6335407f882bc5c2ad12c0","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ada3b4533518ace8404a3f6dd192bd29","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/177f283ba21d1c077054dac07f88f3bd","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.07.14","exceedPercentage":"80.88%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1101},{"badgeId":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be-3","templateUuid":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be","name":"Legendary Trader","description":"Total number of securities or futures transactions reached 300","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/656db16598a0b8f21429e10d6c1cb033","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/03f10910d4dd9234f9b5702a3342193a","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0c767e35268feb729d50d3fa9a386c5a","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2022.06.07","exceedPercentage":"93.66%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100},{"badgeId":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789-1","templateUuid":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789","name":"Knowledgeable Investor","description":"Traded more than 10 stocks","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e74cc24115c4fbae6154ec1b1041bf47","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d48265cbfd97c57f9048db29f22227b0","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76c6d6898b073c77e1c537ebe9ac1c57","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1102},{"badgeId":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84-1","templateUuid":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84","name":"Real Trader","description":"Completed a transaction","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":5,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":null,"starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":40,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"hot","tweets":[{"id":251578699980872,"gmtCreate":1702457793490,"gmtModify":1702457797290,"author":{"id":"3569553993868964","authorId":"3569553993868964","authorIdStr":"3569553993868964","name":"leejk","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13d40c01a9eef0aa4dc0a703e255de7a","crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3569553993868964"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/AMD\">$Advanced Micro Devices(AMD)$&nbsp;</a>","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/AMD\">$Advanced Micro Devices(AMD)$&nbsp;</a>","text":"$Advanced Micro Devices(AMD)$","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/bb6c3f28e36a82c6c7e8680ba88ae5a3","width":"981","height":"1637"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/251578699980872","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":240,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":234501560045608,"gmtCreate":1698290862676,"gmtModify":1698290866217,"author":{"id":"3569553993868964","authorId":"3569553993868964","authorIdStr":"3569553993868964","name":"leejk","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13d40c01a9eef0aa4dc0a703e255de7a","crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3569553993868964"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Test<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/TXN\">$Texas Instruments(TXN)$&nbsp;</a>","listText":"Test<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/TXN\">$Texas Instruments(TXN)$&nbsp;</a>","text":"Test$Texas Instruments(TXN)$","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/234501560045608","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":382,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9940725416,"gmtCreate":1678198165536,"gmtModify":1678198169268,"author":{"id":"3569553993868964","authorId":"3569553993868964","authorIdStr":"3569553993868964","name":"leejk","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13d40c01a9eef0aa4dc0a703e255de7a","crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3569553993868964"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Tan","listText":"Tan","text":"Tan","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9940725416","repostId":"627883895","repostType":1,"repost":{"id":627883895,"gmtCreate":1678187400000,"gmtModify":1678195489774,"author":{"id":"3465782205567474","authorId":"3465782205567474","authorIdStr":"3465782205567474","name":"丫丫港股圈","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f71230774f6081dd8737bd2f96066105","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3465782205567474"},"themes":[],"title":"再次跳水","htmlText":"高位盤整仍在持續，A股靠中字頭突破了一點，但隨着三桶油的暴拉，市場意識到大事不妙，連忙跳水，3300點又失守了，而創業板更是怒創新低。儘管說國企重估，是好的趨勢，但是用力過猛，自然會招致市場反噬。前期最火爆的運營商，進入暴跌狀態，而暴漲暴跌，絕非這些股票的常態。三桶油業務不如運營商穩，但勝在股息更高，所以今天還能說上漲有一定的合理性，但漲了那麼多過後，後續的也會如運營商一樣，短炒大於投資。其餘還不錯的板塊大多是資源類，今年才兩個月，成長大於價值的表現已經顛倒了過來，今年又是石油煤炭成爲領漲板塊的一年，而不知不覺，那些反彈猛烈的成長板塊，一個個都倒下了，甚至還在創新低。所以說，市場還是認業績和估值的。另外港股跌幅相對沒有A股小，而且匯率這段時間在貶值，足以反應這段時間港股同樣堅挺，港股的中字頭同樣也在上漲，幅度比A股只高不低，原因是，H股總是比A股低估。接下來的時間，這個低估重估還會是市場的一大推力，但也別忘了，成長才是最重要的，國企是低估，但是業績沒有太大成長空間，其漲幅空間就有限。現在市場若對成長板塊不看好，我們則要反其道而行。畢竟長期來看，科技纔是第一生產力，人們往往高估了短期的變化，卻又低估了長期的改變。","listText":"高位盤整仍在持續，A股靠中字頭突破了一點，但隨着三桶油的暴拉，市場意識到大事不妙，連忙跳水，3300點又失守了，而創業板更是怒創新低。儘管說國企重估，是好的趨勢，但是用力過猛，自然會招致市場反噬。前期最火爆的運營商，進入暴跌狀態，而暴漲暴跌，絕非這些股票的常態。三桶油業務不如運營商穩，但勝在股息更高，所以今天還能說上漲有一定的合理性，但漲了那麼多過後，後續的也會如運營商一樣，短炒大於投資。其餘還不錯的板塊大多是資源類，今年才兩個月，成長大於價值的表現已經顛倒了過來，今年又是石油煤炭成爲領漲板塊的一年，而不知不覺，那些反彈猛烈的成長板塊，一個個都倒下了，甚至還在創新低。所以說，市場還是認業績和估值的。另外港股跌幅相對沒有A股小，而且匯率這段時間在貶值，足以反應這段時間港股同樣堅挺，港股的中字頭同樣也在上漲，幅度比A股只高不低，原因是，H股總是比A股低估。接下來的時間，這個低估重估還會是市場的一大推力，但也別忘了，成長才是最重要的，國企是低估，但是業績沒有太大成長空間，其漲幅空間就有限。現在市場若對成長板塊不看好，我們則要反其道而行。畢竟長期來看，科技纔是第一生產力，人們往往高估了短期的變化，卻又低估了長期的改變。","text":"高位盤整仍在持續，A股靠中字頭突破了一點，但隨着三桶油的暴拉，市場意識到大事不妙，連忙跳水，3300點又失守了，而創業板更是怒創新低。儘管說國企重估，是好的趨勢，但是用力過猛，自然會招致市場反噬。前期最火爆的運營商，進入暴跌狀態，而暴漲暴跌，絕非這些股票的常態。三桶油業務不如運營商穩，但勝在股息更高，所以今天還能說上漲有一定的合理性，但漲了那麼多過後，後續的也會如運營商一樣，短炒大於投資。其餘還不錯的板塊大多是資源類，今年才兩個月，成長大於價值的表現已經顛倒了過來，今年又是石油煤炭成爲領漲板塊的一年，而不知不覺，那些反彈猛烈的成長板塊，一個個都倒下了，甚至還在創新低。所以說，市場還是認業績和估值的。另外港股跌幅相對沒有A股小，而且匯率這段時間在貶值，足以反應這段時間港股同樣堅挺，港股的中字頭同樣也在上漲，幅度比A股只高不低，原因是，H股總是比A股低估。接下來的時間，這個低估重估還會是市場的一大推力，但也別忘了，成長才是最重要的，國企是低估，但是業績沒有太大成長空間，其漲幅空間就有限。現在市場若對成長板塊不看好，我們則要反其道而行。畢竟長期來看，科技纔是第一生產力，人們往往高估了短期的變化，卻又低估了長期的改變。","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8cb444ee197a4deeaa35e0da8b12d868","width":"0","height":"0"}],"top":1,"highlighted":2,"essential":1,"paper":2,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/627883895","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":0,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":384,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9940538008,"gmtCreate":1678022648804,"gmtModify":1678022653853,"author":{"id":"3569553993868964","authorId":"3569553993868964","authorIdStr":"3569553993868964","name":"leejk","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13d40c01a9eef0aa4dc0a703e255de7a","crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3569553993868964"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Test one test two when can my break be?","listText":"Test one test two when can my break be?","text":"Test one test two when can my break be?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9940538008","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":235,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9926833920,"gmtCreate":1671503988461,"gmtModify":1676538547349,"author":{"id":"3569553993868964","authorId":"3569553993868964","authorIdStr":"3569553993868964","name":"leejk","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13d40c01a9eef0aa4dc0a703e255de7a","crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3569553993868964"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Thanks","listText":"Thanks","text":"Thanks","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9926833920","repostId":"623502390","repostType":1,"repost":{"id":623502390,"gmtCreate":1671502072112,"gmtModify":1676538547080,"author":{"id":"3488157435400312","authorId":"3488157435400312","authorIdStr":"3488157435400312","name":"GPLP犀牛财经","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/14abc57b2bc335b01ce8f7df19813f91","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3488157435400312"},"themes":[],"title":"犀牛早訊：12月份以來超百隻信用債取消發行","htmlText":"齊魯轉債上市首日“破發” 可轉債市場總體運行平穩數據顯示，12月19日，齊魯銀行發行的80億元齊魯轉債上市。截至收盤，齊魯轉債跌4.87%，成爲今年以來第一隻上市首日“破發”的可轉債。截至12月19日，今年以來共有142只可轉債上市，上市首日平均漲幅爲29.74%。（中國證券報）年末頻頻調節“流量閥” 基金經理攻守兼備部分主動權益類基金於近期頻頻實施限購，同時也有部分主動權益類基金開門迎客，恢復正常申購業務。業內人士表示，限購表現分化可能和基金經理對產品規模的要求以及對市場的態度有關。展望明年權益市場，有基金經理認爲，市場的投資主線可能會圍繞穩增長和新賽道展開，地產板塊、消費板塊以及科技成長板塊或可作爲重點配置方向。（中國證券報）央行再啓14天期逆回購 護航年末流動性平穩分析人士認爲，央行重啓14天期逆回購，以及超額續作MLF，都體現央行着力維護年末流動性平穩的意圖，預計跨年資金價格難以明顯下行。從受訪情況來看，近期資金面趨緊原因包括月度繳稅、年終銀行考覈等。（上海證券報）12月大幅加倉醫藥生物板塊 內資外資偏好有所不同受疫情影響，A股醫藥生物板塊近期表現強勢，不少與新冠防治、新冠檢測相關的醫藥公司股價大漲，持續引發資金關注。從交易所公佈的數據看，高風險偏好的融資資金與持股週期偏長的北向資金，12月以來均大幅加碼醫藥生物板塊，成爲推動對應個股股價走強的重要因素。（上海證券報）穩預期強信心抓落實 充分挖掘增長潛力連日來，各地陸續召開會議傳達學習中央經濟工作會議精神。大家一致認爲，會議對於凝聚共識、堅定信心，做好明年經濟工作，具有重大而深遠的意義。要緊緊抓牢高質量發展這個首要任務，穩預期、強信心、抓落實，科學確定2023年經濟發展目標，充分挖掘增長潛力，深化高水平改革開放。（證券時報）北京上市公司加速復工復產 多措並舉“應開盡開”19日是北京明確重點行業企業全面復工復產首日，記","listText":"齊魯轉債上市首日“破發” 可轉債市場總體運行平穩數據顯示，12月19日，齊魯銀行發行的80億元齊魯轉債上市。截至收盤，齊魯轉債跌4.87%，成爲今年以來第一隻上市首日“破發”的可轉債。截至12月19日，今年以來共有142只可轉債上市，上市首日平均漲幅爲29.74%。（中國證券報）年末頻頻調節“流量閥” 基金經理攻守兼備部分主動權益類基金於近期頻頻實施限購，同時也有部分主動權益類基金開門迎客，恢復正常申購業務。業內人士表示，限購表現分化可能和基金經理對產品規模的要求以及對市場的態度有關。展望明年權益市場，有基金經理認爲，市場的投資主線可能會圍繞穩增長和新賽道展開，地產板塊、消費板塊以及科技成長板塊或可作爲重點配置方向。（中國證券報）央行再啓14天期逆回購 護航年末流動性平穩分析人士認爲，央行重啓14天期逆回購，以及超額續作MLF，都體現央行着力維護年末流動性平穩的意圖，預計跨年資金價格難以明顯下行。從受訪情況來看，近期資金面趨緊原因包括月度繳稅、年終銀行考覈等。（上海證券報）12月大幅加倉醫藥生物板塊 內資外資偏好有所不同受疫情影響，A股醫藥生物板塊近期表現強勢，不少與新冠防治、新冠檢測相關的醫藥公司股價大漲，持續引發資金關注。從交易所公佈的數據看，高風險偏好的融資資金與持股週期偏長的北向資金，12月以來均大幅加碼醫藥生物板塊，成爲推動對應個股股價走強的重要因素。（上海證券報）穩預期強信心抓落實 充分挖掘增長潛力連日來，各地陸續召開會議傳達學習中央經濟工作會議精神。大家一致認爲，會議對於凝聚共識、堅定信心，做好明年經濟工作，具有重大而深遠的意義。要緊緊抓牢高質量發展這個首要任務，穩預期、強信心、抓落實，科學確定2023年經濟發展目標，充分挖掘增長潛力，深化高水平改革開放。（證券時報）北京上市公司加速復工復產 多措並舉“應開盡開”19日是北京明確重點行業企業全面復工復產首日，記","text":"齊魯轉債上市首日“破發” 可轉債市場總體運行平穩數據顯示，12月19日，齊魯銀行發行的80億元齊魯轉債上市。截至收盤，齊魯轉債跌4.87%，成爲今年以來第一隻上市首日“破發”的可轉債。截至12月19日，今年以來共有142只可轉債上市，上市首日平均漲幅爲29.74%。（中國證券報）年末頻頻調節“流量閥” 基金經理攻守兼備部分主動權益類基金於近期頻頻實施限購，同時也有部分主動權益類基金開門迎客，恢復正常申購業務。業內人士表示，限購表現分化可能和基金經理對產品規模的要求以及對市場的態度有關。展望明年權益市場，有基金經理認爲，市場的投資主線可能會圍繞穩增長和新賽道展開，地產板塊、消費板塊以及科技成長板塊或可作爲重點配置方向。（中國證券報）央行再啓14天期逆回購 護航年末流動性平穩分析人士認爲，央行重啓14天期逆回購，以及超額續作MLF，都體現央行着力維護年末流動性平穩的意圖，預計跨年資金價格難以明顯下行。從受訪情況來看，近期資金面趨緊原因包括月度繳稅、年終銀行考覈等。（上海證券報）12月大幅加倉醫藥生物板塊 內資外資偏好有所不同受疫情影響，A股醫藥生物板塊近期表現強勢，不少與新冠防治、新冠檢測相關的醫藥公司股價大漲，持續引發資金關注。從交易所公佈的數據看，高風險偏好的融資資金與持股週期偏長的北向資金，12月以來均大幅加碼醫藥生物板塊，成爲推動對應個股股價走強的重要因素。（上海證券報）穩預期強信心抓落實 充分挖掘增長潛力連日來，各地陸續召開會議傳達學習中央經濟工作會議精神。大家一致認爲，會議對於凝聚共識、堅定信心，做好明年經濟工作，具有重大而深遠的意義。要緊緊抓牢高質量發展這個首要任務，穩預期、強信心、抓落實，科學確定2023年經濟發展目標，充分挖掘增長潛力，深化高水平改革開放。（證券時報）北京上市公司加速復工復產 多措並舉“應開盡開”19日是北京明確重點行業企業全面復工復產首日，記","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5b77bc7b050c1111d6c938d0a3cbbd47"}],"top":1,"highlighted":2,"essential":1,"paper":2,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/623502390","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":0,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":727,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9928440832,"gmtCreate":1671387292526,"gmtModify":1676538528144,"author":{"id":"3569553993868964","authorId":"3569553993868964","authorIdStr":"3569553993868964","name":"leejk","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13d40c01a9eef0aa4dc0a703e255de7a","crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3569553993868964"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Messi","listText":"Messi","text":"Messi","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9928440832","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":491,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9921766687,"gmtCreate":1671136157949,"gmtModify":1676538496173,"author":{"id":"3569553993868964","authorId":"3569553993868964","authorIdStr":"3569553993868964","name":"leejk","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13d40c01a9eef0aa4dc0a703e255de7a","crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3569553993868964"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Tan","listText":"Tan","text":"Tan","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9921766687","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":514,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9921582976,"gmtCreate":1671091472896,"gmtModify":1676538488466,"author":{"id":"3569553993868964","authorId":"3569553993868964","authorIdStr":"3569553993868964","name":"leejk","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13d40c01a9eef0aa4dc0a703e255de7a","crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3569553993868964"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Thanks","listText":"Thanks","text":"Thanks","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9921582976","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":447,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9921582083,"gmtCreate":1671091447543,"gmtModify":1676538488458,"author":{"id":"3569553993868964","authorId":"3569553993868964","authorIdStr":"3569553993868964","name":"leejk","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13d40c01a9eef0aa4dc0a703e255de7a","crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3569553993868964"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Tan","listText":"Tan","text":"Tan","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9921582083","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":448,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9921104845,"gmtCreate":1670988009788,"gmtModify":1676538472082,"author":{"id":"3569553993868964","authorId":"3569553993868964","authorIdStr":"3569553993868964","name":"leejk","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13d40c01a9eef0aa4dc0a703e255de7a","crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3569553993868964"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"R fhc","listText":"R fhc","text":"R fhc","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9921104845","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":612,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9923288380,"gmtCreate":1670862084641,"gmtModify":1676538448793,"author":{"id":"3569553993868964","authorId":"3569553993868964","authorIdStr":"3569553993868964","name":"leejk","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13d40c01a9eef0aa4dc0a703e255de7a","crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3569553993868964"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Take t","listText":"Take t","text":"Take t","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9923288380","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":225,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9923124077,"gmtCreate":1670812152100,"gmtModify":1676538438369,"author":{"id":"3569553993868964","authorId":"3569553993868964","authorIdStr":"3569553993868964","name":"leejk","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13d40c01a9eef0aa4dc0a703e255de7a","crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3569553993868964"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/TSLA\">$Tesla Motors(TSLA)$&nbsp;</a><v-v data-views=\"1\"></v-v>","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/TSLA\">$Tesla Motors(TSLA)$&nbsp;</a><v-v data-views=\"1\"></v-v>","text":"$Tesla Motors(TSLA)$","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9923124077","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":392,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9923122620,"gmtCreate":1670811988461,"gmtModify":1676538438251,"author":{"id":"3569553993868964","authorId":"3569553993868964","authorIdStr":"3569553993868964","name":"leejk","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13d40c01a9eef0aa4dc0a703e255de7a","crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3569553993868964"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Tan","listText":"Tan","text":"Tan","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9923122620","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":126,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9929022750,"gmtCreate":1670567163770,"gmtModify":1676538395641,"author":{"id":"3569553993868964","authorId":"3569553993868964","authorIdStr":"3569553993868964","name":"leejk","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13d40c01a9eef0aa4dc0a703e255de7a","crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3569553993868964"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/FUTU\">$Futu Holdings Limited(FUTU)$&nbsp;</a><v-v data-views=\"1\"></v-v>","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/FUTU\">$Futu Holdings Limited(FUTU)$&nbsp;</a><v-v data-views=\"1\"></v-v>","text":"$Futu Holdings Limited(FUTU)$","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9929022750","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":267,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9920202826,"gmtCreate":1670494151865,"gmtModify":1676538379793,"author":{"id":"3569553993868964","authorId":"3569553993868964","authorIdStr":"3569553993868964","name":"leejk","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13d40c01a9eef0aa4dc0a703e255de7a","crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3569553993868964"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Thank","listText":"Thank","text":"Thank","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9920202826","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":193,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9967792333,"gmtCreate":1670375818323,"gmtModify":1676538355069,"author":{"id":"3569553993868964","authorId":"3569553993868964","authorIdStr":"3569553993868964","name":"leejk","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13d40c01a9eef0aa4dc0a703e255de7a","crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3569553993868964"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/BABA\">$Alibaba(BABA)$&nbsp;</a><v-v data-views=\"1\"></v-v>","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/BABA\">$Alibaba(BABA)$&nbsp;</a><v-v data-views=\"1\"></v-v>","text":"$Alibaba(BABA)$","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9967792333","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":121,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9967630624,"gmtCreate":1670307918569,"gmtModify":1676538341590,"author":{"id":"3569553993868964","authorId":"3569553993868964","authorIdStr":"3569553993868964","name":"leejk","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13d40c01a9eef0aa4dc0a703e255de7a","crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3569553993868964"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Th","listText":"Th","text":"Th","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9967630624","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":116,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9967031603,"gmtCreate":1670223010902,"gmtModify":1676538324019,"author":{"id":"3569553993868964","authorId":"3569553993868964","authorIdStr":"3569553993868964","name":"leejk","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13d40c01a9eef0aa4dc0a703e255de7a","crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3569553993868964"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Th","listText":"Th","text":"Th","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9967031603","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":347,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9967031898,"gmtCreate":1670222974915,"gmtModify":1676538324018,"author":{"id":"3569553993868964","authorId":"3569553993868964","authorIdStr":"3569553993868964","name":"leejk","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13d40c01a9eef0aa4dc0a703e255de7a","crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3569553993868964"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ryan's","listText":"Ryan's","text":"Ryan's","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9967031898","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":158,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9967099844,"gmtCreate":1670220290089,"gmtModify":1676538323522,"author":{"id":"3569553993868964","authorId":"3569553993868964","authorIdStr":"3569553993868964","name":"leejk","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13d40c01a9eef0aa4dc0a703e255de7a","crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3569553993868964"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/GME\">$GameStop(GME)$&nbsp;</a><v-v data-views=\"1\"></v-v>","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/GME\">$GameStop(GME)$&nbsp;</a><v-v data-views=\"1\"></v-v>","text":"$GameStop(GME)$","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9967099844","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":324,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":9907745776,"gmtCreate":1660261352097,"gmtModify":1676532327942,"author":{"id":"3569553993868964","authorId":"3569553993868964","authorIdStr":"3569553993868964","name":"leejk","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13d40c01a9eef0aa4dc0a703e255de7a","crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3569553993868964"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/SWBI\">$Smith And Wesson Brands Inc(SWBI)$</a>U","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/SWBI\">$Smith And Wesson Brands Inc(SWBI)$</a>U","text":"$Smith And Wesson Brands Inc(SWBI)$U","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/92a249c78c2e4e55a98337164fff1afa","width":"1170","height":"4134"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9907745776","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":110,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9023094195,"gmtCreate":1652835020717,"gmtModify":1676535171261,"author":{"id":"3569553993868964","authorId":"3569553993868964","authorIdStr":"3569553993868964","name":"leejk","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13d40c01a9eef0aa4dc0a703e255de7a","crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3569553993868964"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Thanks","listText":"Thanks","text":"Thanks","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9023094195","repostId":"2236274480","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2236274480","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1652828904,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2236274480?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-05-18 07:08","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Powell Says Fed Has Resolve to Bring U.S. Inflation Down","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2236274480","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell said the central bank's resolve in combating the highest inflation in 40 years shouldn't be questioned, even if it requires pushing up unemployment.\"Restoring pr","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell said the central bank&#39;s resolve in combating the highest inflation in 40 years shouldn&#39;t be questioned, even if it requires pushing up unemployment.</p><p>&#34;Restoring price stability is a nonnegotiable need. It is something we have to do,&#34; Mr. Powell said in an interview Tuesday during The Wall Street Journal&#39;s Future of Everything Festival. &#34;There could be some pain involved.&#34;</p><p>Mr. Powell said he hoped that the Fed could bring down inflation while preserving a strong labor market, which he said might lead the unemployment rate -- near half-century lows of 3.6% in April -- to rise slightly. &#34;It may not be a perfect labor market,&#34; he said.</p><p>The central bank is raising interest rates as part of its most aggressive effort in decades to curb upward price pressures. Mr. Powell signaled Tuesday that the central bank was likely to follow a half-percentage-point raise earlier this month, to a range between 0.75% and 1%, with similar moves at meetings in June and July. Until this month, the Fed hadn&#39;t raised rates in such intervals since 2000.</p><p>The Fed last year maintained aggressive stimulus to spur a faster labor market recovery. Mr. Powell said Tuesday that it was possible that disruptions from the pandemic had changed the labor market in ways that made current levels of unemployment inconsistent with the Fed&#39;s 2% inflation goal.</p><p>He said that it seemed the unemployment rate consistent with stable inflation &#34;is probably well above 3.6%.&#34;</p><p>The Fed chairman repeated his hope that the central bank can curtail high inflation without spurring a large rise in unemployment. However, Mr. Powell said, there is little from modern economic experience to suggest that outcome can be achieved. &#34;If you look in the history book and find it -- no, you can&#39;t,&#34; he said. &#34;I think we are in a world of firsts.&#34;</p><p>Wells Fargo &amp; Co. Chief Executive Charlie Scharf, speaking at the same event Tuesday morning, said it would be difficult to avoid a recession but noted that consumers and businesses remain financially solid.</p><p>&#34;The fact that everyone is so strong going into this should hopefully provide a cushion such that whatever recession there is, if there is <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a>, is short and not all that deep,&#34; he said.</p><p>Mr. Powell said he wasn&#39;t at odds with those who believe the Fed faces a difficult path to achieving what is known as a &#34;soft landing,&#34; in which growth slows enough to bring down inflation without triggering a recession.</p><p>&#34;I would say there is no disagreement really. It is a challenging task, made more challenging the last couple months because of global events,&#34; he said. &#34;It is challenging because unemployment is very low already and because inflation is very high.&#34;</p><p>Fed officials described higher inflation a year ago as temporary. They backed away from that characterization last fall, as the labor market healed rapidly and price pressures broadened.</p><p>Still, the Fed as recently as January had expected inflation to diminish this spring as supply-chain bottlenecks improved. Russia&#39;s invasion of Ukraine in late February and rolling Covid-related lockdowns in China created new sources of inflationary pressures.</p><p>&#34;That is going to make it harder for inflation to come down, so it has added a degree of difficulty to what was already a challenging market,&#34; said Mr. Powell.</p><p>The Fed&#39;s stopping point for rate increases isn&#39;t certainty. If inflation doesn&#39;t show signs of diminishing soon, more officials could conclude that rates need to rise closer to 4% over the next 12 to 18 months, rather than to a level around 3% that most of them projected at their policy meeting two months ago.</p><p>&#34;We will go until we feel like we are at a place where we can say, &#39;Yes, financial conditions are at an appropriate place. We see inflation coming down,&#39;&#34; Mr. Powell said. &#34;We will go to that point, and there will not be any hesitation about that.&#34;</p><p>The most recent inflation data has been mixed. On a monthly basis, the consumer-price index&#39;s gauge of core prices, which excludes food and energy, rose a seasonally adjusted 0.6% in April, according to a Labor Department report last week, and rose 6.2% over the previous 12 months.</p><p>The Fed uses a different gauge, the personal-consumption expenditures price index. April inflation data from that Commerce Department report will be released on May 27. Based on other recently released figures, Wall Street forecasters estimate a more muted rise in inflation using that measure. Economists at <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSTLW\">Morgan Stanley</a> think core PCE inflation rose by less than 0.3% in April, bringing the 12-month rate of change to 4.8%, from 5.2% in March.</p><p>&#34;This is not a time for tremendously nuanced readings of inflation,&#34; Mr. Powell said. &#34;We need to see inflation coming down in a convincing way. Until we do, we&#39;ll keep going.&#34;</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Powell Says Fed Has Resolve to Bring U.S. Inflation Down</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nPowell Says Fed Has Resolve to Bring U.S. Inflation Down\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-05-18 07:08</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell said the central bank&#39;s resolve in combating the highest inflation in 40 years shouldn&#39;t be questioned, even if it requires pushing up unemployment.</p><p>&#34;Restoring price stability is a nonnegotiable need. It is something we have to do,&#34; Mr. Powell said in an interview Tuesday during The Wall Street Journal&#39;s Future of Everything Festival. &#34;There could be some pain involved.&#34;</p><p>Mr. Powell said he hoped that the Fed could bring down inflation while preserving a strong labor market, which he said might lead the unemployment rate -- near half-century lows of 3.6% in April -- to rise slightly. &#34;It may not be a perfect labor market,&#34; he said.</p><p>The central bank is raising interest rates as part of its most aggressive effort in decades to curb upward price pressures. Mr. Powell signaled Tuesday that the central bank was likely to follow a half-percentage-point raise earlier this month, to a range between 0.75% and 1%, with similar moves at meetings in June and July. Until this month, the Fed hadn&#39;t raised rates in such intervals since 2000.</p><p>The Fed last year maintained aggressive stimulus to spur a faster labor market recovery. Mr. Powell said Tuesday that it was possible that disruptions from the pandemic had changed the labor market in ways that made current levels of unemployment inconsistent with the Fed&#39;s 2% inflation goal.</p><p>He said that it seemed the unemployment rate consistent with stable inflation &#34;is probably well above 3.6%.&#34;</p><p>The Fed chairman repeated his hope that the central bank can curtail high inflation without spurring a large rise in unemployment. However, Mr. Powell said, there is little from modern economic experience to suggest that outcome can be achieved. &#34;If you look in the history book and find it -- no, you can&#39;t,&#34; he said. &#34;I think we are in a world of firsts.&#34;</p><p>Wells Fargo &amp; Co. Chief Executive Charlie Scharf, speaking at the same event Tuesday morning, said it would be difficult to avoid a recession but noted that consumers and businesses remain financially solid.</p><p>&#34;The fact that everyone is so strong going into this should hopefully provide a cushion such that whatever recession there is, if there is <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a>, is short and not all that deep,&#34; he said.</p><p>Mr. Powell said he wasn&#39;t at odds with those who believe the Fed faces a difficult path to achieving what is known as a &#34;soft landing,&#34; in which growth slows enough to bring down inflation without triggering a recession.</p><p>&#34;I would say there is no disagreement really. It is a challenging task, made more challenging the last couple months because of global events,&#34; he said. &#34;It is challenging because unemployment is very low already and because inflation is very high.&#34;</p><p>Fed officials described higher inflation a year ago as temporary. They backed away from that characterization last fall, as the labor market healed rapidly and price pressures broadened.</p><p>Still, the Fed as recently as January had expected inflation to diminish this spring as supply-chain bottlenecks improved. Russia&#39;s invasion of Ukraine in late February and rolling Covid-related lockdowns in China created new sources of inflationary pressures.</p><p>&#34;That is going to make it harder for inflation to come down, so it has added a degree of difficulty to what was already a challenging market,&#34; said Mr. Powell.</p><p>The Fed&#39;s stopping point for rate increases isn&#39;t certainty. If inflation doesn&#39;t show signs of diminishing soon, more officials could conclude that rates need to rise closer to 4% over the next 12 to 18 months, rather than to a level around 3% that most of them projected at their policy meeting two months ago.</p><p>&#34;We will go until we feel like we are at a place where we can say, &#39;Yes, financial conditions are at an appropriate place. We see inflation coming down,&#39;&#34; Mr. Powell said. &#34;We will go to that point, and there will not be any hesitation about that.&#34;</p><p>The most recent inflation data has been mixed. On a monthly basis, the consumer-price index&#39;s gauge of core prices, which excludes food and energy, rose a seasonally adjusted 0.6% in April, according to a Labor Department report last week, and rose 6.2% over the previous 12 months.</p><p>The Fed uses a different gauge, the personal-consumption expenditures price index. April inflation data from that Commerce Department report will be released on May 27. Based on other recently released figures, Wall Street forecasters estimate a more muted rise in inflation using that measure. Economists at <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSTLW\">Morgan Stanley</a> think core PCE inflation rose by less than 0.3% in April, bringing the 12-month rate of change to 4.8%, from 5.2% in March.</p><p>&#34;This is not a time for tremendously nuanced readings of inflation,&#34; Mr. Powell said. &#34;We need to see inflation coming down in a convincing way. Until we do, we&#39;ll keep going.&#34;</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".DJI":"道琼斯",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2236274480","content_text":"Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell said the central bank's resolve in combating the highest inflation in 40 years shouldn't be questioned, even if it requires pushing up unemployment.\"Restoring price stability is a nonnegotiable need. It is something we have to do,\" Mr. Powell said in an interview Tuesday during The Wall Street Journal's Future of Everything Festival. \"There could be some pain involved.\"Mr. Powell said he hoped that the Fed could bring down inflation while preserving a strong labor market, which he said might lead the unemployment rate -- near half-century lows of 3.6% in April -- to rise slightly. \"It may not be a perfect labor market,\" he said.The central bank is raising interest rates as part of its most aggressive effort in decades to curb upward price pressures. Mr. Powell signaled Tuesday that the central bank was likely to follow a half-percentage-point raise earlier this month, to a range between 0.75% and 1%, with similar moves at meetings in June and July. Until this month, the Fed hadn't raised rates in such intervals since 2000.The Fed last year maintained aggressive stimulus to spur a faster labor market recovery. Mr. Powell said Tuesday that it was possible that disruptions from the pandemic had changed the labor market in ways that made current levels of unemployment inconsistent with the Fed's 2% inflation goal.He said that it seemed the unemployment rate consistent with stable inflation \"is probably well above 3.6%.\"The Fed chairman repeated his hope that the central bank can curtail high inflation without spurring a large rise in unemployment. However, Mr. Powell said, there is little from modern economic experience to suggest that outcome can be achieved. \"If you look in the history book and find it -- no, you can't,\" he said. \"I think we are in a world of firsts.\"Wells Fargo & Co. Chief Executive Charlie Scharf, speaking at the same event Tuesday morning, said it would be difficult to avoid a recession but noted that consumers and businesses remain financially solid.\"The fact that everyone is so strong going into this should hopefully provide a cushion such that whatever recession there is, if there is one, is short and not all that deep,\" he said.Mr. Powell said he wasn't at odds with those who believe the Fed faces a difficult path to achieving what is known as a \"soft landing,\" in which growth slows enough to bring down inflation without triggering a recession.\"I would say there is no disagreement really. It is a challenging task, made more challenging the last couple months because of global events,\" he said. \"It is challenging because unemployment is very low already and because inflation is very high.\"Fed officials described higher inflation a year ago as temporary. They backed away from that characterization last fall, as the labor market healed rapidly and price pressures broadened.Still, the Fed as recently as January had expected inflation to diminish this spring as supply-chain bottlenecks improved. Russia's invasion of Ukraine in late February and rolling Covid-related lockdowns in China created new sources of inflationary pressures.\"That is going to make it harder for inflation to come down, so it has added a degree of difficulty to what was already a challenging market,\" said Mr. Powell.The Fed's stopping point for rate increases isn't certainty. If inflation doesn't show signs of diminishing soon, more officials could conclude that rates need to rise closer to 4% over the next 12 to 18 months, rather than to a level around 3% that most of them projected at their policy meeting two months ago.\"We will go until we feel like we are at a place where we can say, 'Yes, financial conditions are at an appropriate place. We see inflation coming down,'\" Mr. Powell said. \"We will go to that point, and there will not be any hesitation about that.\"The most recent inflation data has been mixed. On a monthly basis, the consumer-price index's gauge of core prices, which excludes food and energy, rose a seasonally adjusted 0.6% in April, according to a Labor Department report last week, and rose 6.2% over the previous 12 months.The Fed uses a different gauge, the personal-consumption expenditures price index. April inflation data from that Commerce Department report will be released on May 27. Based on other recently released figures, Wall Street forecasters estimate a more muted rise in inflation using that measure. Economists at Morgan Stanley think core PCE inflation rose by less than 0.3% in April, bringing the 12-month rate of change to 4.8%, from 5.2% in March.\"This is not a time for tremendously nuanced readings of inflation,\" Mr. Powell said. \"We need to see inflation coming down in a convincing way. Until we do, we'll keep going.\"","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":84,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9024931317,"gmtCreate":1653787401239,"gmtModify":1676535340822,"author":{"id":"3569553993868964","authorId":"3569553993868964","authorIdStr":"3569553993868964","name":"leejk","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13d40c01a9eef0aa4dc0a703e255de7a","crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3569553993868964"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Thanks","listText":"Thanks","text":"Thanks","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9024931317","repostId":"2238585689","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2238585689","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1653785130,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2238585689?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-05-29 08:45","market":"us","language":"en","title":"$250 Billion in \"Rebalancing\" Inflows Could Rescue Stocks By the End of June, JPMorgan Says","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2238585689","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"While stock-market strategists at Bank of America and Morgan Stanley grow increasingly bearish, JPMo","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>While stock-market strategists at Bank of America and Morgan Stanley grow increasingly bearish, JPMorgan&#39;s equity-research department has churned up yet another bullish note for the bank&#39;s clients, advising them about the potential for massive month- and quarter-end rebalancing flows that could trigger a sustained rebound in stocks, putting even more distance between the U.S. benchmarks and the bear-market territory with which the S&amp;P 500 index was flirting late last week.</p><p>The team of JPMorgan equity quants, led by Nikolaos Panigirtzoglou, told the bank&#39;s clients that potentially more than $250 billion could flow into stocks by the end of June as American mutual funds and pension funds, along with foreign pensions and sovereign-wealth funds, &#34;rebalance&#34; by buying stocks and selling bonds to compensate for the latest drop in stocks.</p><p>In their latest report on equity flows and liquidity, the team said it expects between $34 billion and $56 billion of buying by &#34;balanced&#34; mutual funds (that is, funds that aim to maintain a 60/40 weighting of stocks to bonds in accordance with the principles of Modern Portfolio Theory).</p><p>But even larger than the mutual-fund universe is the world of defined-benefit pension funds, which Panigirtzoglou and his team believe could dump as much as $167 billion into U.S. stocks by the end of June.</p><p>These funds have an aggregate $7.5 trillion in assets under management, according to JPMorgan, and although pension funds tend to rebalance more slowly than mutual funds, the JPMorgan team suspects that they might be behind the eight-ball on rebalancing for April, leaving more room for buying as we head into the summer months.</p><p>Finally, the JPMorgan analysts expect an additional $40 billion of inflows from major foreign buyers like the Norges Bank (which controls Norway&#39;s massive sovereign-wealth fund), the Swiss National Bank (which maintains a large portfolio of U.S. equities) and Japanese pension funds.</p><p>All told, that&#39;s potentially more than $250 billion in inflows that could bolster Wall Street stocks. Since algorithmic traders like Commodity Trading Advisors often trade based on momentum, the initial move higher in equities caused by these inflows could potentially trigger a virtuous feedback loop that could see stocks erase more than half of their year-to-date losses -- at least, according to JPMorgan.</p><p>To be sure, the JPMorgan team had expected a significant bump in equity prices due to rebalancing back in March, a call that didn&#39;t quite come to pass, although global equities did stage a brief rally, registering a modest gain for the month, their only monthly gain so far this year.</p><p>JPMorgan&#39;s strategists, particularly Panigirtzoglou and his colleague Marko Kolanovic, have been some of the most stridently bullish voices on Wall Street so far this year. But as noted above, other Wall Street strategists are much more bearish: for example, Lisa Shalett, chief investment officer of Morgan Stanley Wealth Management, said in a note to clients published Monday that downward earnings revisions could cause stocks to shed another 5% to 10% of their value.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>$250 Billion in \"Rebalancing\" Inflows Could Rescue Stocks By the End of June, JPMorgan Says</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n$250 Billion in \"Rebalancing\" Inflows Could Rescue Stocks By the End of June, JPMorgan Says\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-05-29 08:45</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>While stock-market strategists at Bank of America and Morgan Stanley grow increasingly bearish, JPMorgan&#39;s equity-research department has churned up yet another bullish note for the bank&#39;s clients, advising them about the potential for massive month- and quarter-end rebalancing flows that could trigger a sustained rebound in stocks, putting even more distance between the U.S. benchmarks and the bear-market territory with which the S&amp;P 500 index was flirting late last week.</p><p>The team of JPMorgan equity quants, led by Nikolaos Panigirtzoglou, told the bank&#39;s clients that potentially more than $250 billion could flow into stocks by the end of June as American mutual funds and pension funds, along with foreign pensions and sovereign-wealth funds, &#34;rebalance&#34; by buying stocks and selling bonds to compensate for the latest drop in stocks.</p><p>In their latest report on equity flows and liquidity, the team said it expects between $34 billion and $56 billion of buying by &#34;balanced&#34; mutual funds (that is, funds that aim to maintain a 60/40 weighting of stocks to bonds in accordance with the principles of Modern Portfolio Theory).</p><p>But even larger than the mutual-fund universe is the world of defined-benefit pension funds, which Panigirtzoglou and his team believe could dump as much as $167 billion into U.S. stocks by the end of June.</p><p>These funds have an aggregate $7.5 trillion in assets under management, according to JPMorgan, and although pension funds tend to rebalance more slowly than mutual funds, the JPMorgan team suspects that they might be behind the eight-ball on rebalancing for April, leaving more room for buying as we head into the summer months.</p><p>Finally, the JPMorgan analysts expect an additional $40 billion of inflows from major foreign buyers like the Norges Bank (which controls Norway&#39;s massive sovereign-wealth fund), the Swiss National Bank (which maintains a large portfolio of U.S. equities) and Japanese pension funds.</p><p>All told, that&#39;s potentially more than $250 billion in inflows that could bolster Wall Street stocks. Since algorithmic traders like Commodity Trading Advisors often trade based on momentum, the initial move higher in equities caused by these inflows could potentially trigger a virtuous feedback loop that could see stocks erase more than half of their year-to-date losses -- at least, according to JPMorgan.</p><p>To be sure, the JPMorgan team had expected a significant bump in equity prices due to rebalancing back in March, a call that didn&#39;t quite come to pass, although global equities did stage a brief rally, registering a modest gain for the month, their only monthly gain so far this year.</p><p>JPMorgan&#39;s strategists, particularly Panigirtzoglou and his colleague Marko Kolanovic, have been some of the most stridently bullish voices on Wall Street so far this year. But as noted above, other Wall Street strategists are much more bearish: for example, Lisa Shalett, chief investment officer of Morgan Stanley Wealth Management, said in a note to clients published Monday that downward earnings revisions could cause stocks to shed another 5% to 10% of their value.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2238585689","content_text":"While stock-market strategists at Bank of America and Morgan Stanley grow increasingly bearish, JPMorgan's equity-research department has churned up yet another bullish note for the bank's clients, advising them about the potential for massive month- and quarter-end rebalancing flows that could trigger a sustained rebound in stocks, putting even more distance between the U.S. benchmarks and the bear-market territory with which the S&P 500 index was flirting late last week.The team of JPMorgan equity quants, led by Nikolaos Panigirtzoglou, told the bank's clients that potentially more than $250 billion could flow into stocks by the end of June as American mutual funds and pension funds, along with foreign pensions and sovereign-wealth funds, \"rebalance\" by buying stocks and selling bonds to compensate for the latest drop in stocks.In their latest report on equity flows and liquidity, the team said it expects between $34 billion and $56 billion of buying by \"balanced\" mutual funds (that is, funds that aim to maintain a 60/40 weighting of stocks to bonds in accordance with the principles of Modern Portfolio Theory).But even larger than the mutual-fund universe is the world of defined-benefit pension funds, which Panigirtzoglou and his team believe could dump as much as $167 billion into U.S. stocks by the end of June.These funds have an aggregate $7.5 trillion in assets under management, according to JPMorgan, and although pension funds tend to rebalance more slowly than mutual funds, the JPMorgan team suspects that they might be behind the eight-ball on rebalancing for April, leaving more room for buying as we head into the summer months.Finally, the JPMorgan analysts expect an additional $40 billion of inflows from major foreign buyers like the Norges Bank (which controls Norway's massive sovereign-wealth fund), the Swiss National Bank (which maintains a large portfolio of U.S. equities) and Japanese pension funds.All told, that's potentially more than $250 billion in inflows that could bolster Wall Street stocks. Since algorithmic traders like Commodity Trading Advisors often trade based on momentum, the initial move higher in equities caused by these inflows could potentially trigger a virtuous feedback loop that could see stocks erase more than half of their year-to-date losses -- at least, according to JPMorgan.To be sure, the JPMorgan team had expected a significant bump in equity prices due to rebalancing back in March, a call that didn't quite come to pass, although global equities did stage a brief rally, registering a modest gain for the month, their only monthly gain so far this year.JPMorgan's strategists, particularly Panigirtzoglou and his colleague Marko Kolanovic, have been some of the most stridently bullish voices on Wall Street so far this year. But as noted above, other Wall Street strategists are much more bearish: for example, Lisa Shalett, chief investment officer of Morgan Stanley Wealth Management, said in a note to clients published Monday that downward earnings revisions could cause stocks to shed another 5% to 10% of their value.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":28,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9004436352,"gmtCreate":1642654412808,"gmtModify":1676533732664,"author":{"id":"3569553993868964","authorId":"3569553993868964","authorIdStr":"3569553993868964","name":"leejk","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13d40c01a9eef0aa4dc0a703e255de7a","crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3569553993868964"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Thanks","listText":"Thanks","text":"Thanks","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9004436352","repostId":"2204320050","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2204320050","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1642629300,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2204320050?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-01-20 05:55","market":"us","language":"en","title":"US STOCKS-Wall Street Sell-Off Deepens, Nasdaq Confirms Correction","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2204320050","media":"Reuters","summary":"* Nasdaq now down 10.7% from Nov 19 record close* BofA, Morgan Stanley wrap up bank earnings on upbe","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>* Nasdaq now down 10.7% from Nov 19 record close</p><p>* BofA, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSTLW\">Morgan Stanley</a> wrap up bank earnings on upbeat note</p><p>* Procter &amp; Gamble gains after raising outlook</p><p>* Indexes down: Dow 0.96%, S&amp;P 0.97%, Nasdaq 1.15%</p><p>Jan 19 (Reuters) - Wall Street&#39;s main indexes ended sharply lower on Wednesday, with the tech-heavy Nasdaq confirming it was in a correction, after a diverse set of corporate earnings and as investors continued to worry about higher U.S. Treasury yields and the Federal Reserve tightening monetary policy.</p><p>The Nasdaq ended down 10.7% from its Nov. 19 closing record high, as stocks sold off into the market close. A correction is confirmed when an index closes 10% or more below its record closing level.</p><p>The Nasdaq&#39;s last correction was in early 2021, when the tech-heavy index fell more than 10% from Feb. 12 to March 8. It was the fourth time in the two years</p><p>since the coronavirus pandemic shook global markets that the index has found itself in a correction.</p><p>On Wednesday, Apple    shares fell 2.1%, weighing most on the Nasdaq, while declines in Tesla    and Amazon also dragged on the index.</p><p>Stocks have gotten off to a rocky start in 2022, as a fast rise in Treasury yields amid concerns the Fed will become aggressive in controlling inflation has particularly hit tech and growth shares. The benchmark S&amp;P 500 is down about 5% so far this year.</p><p>“Any beginning of tightening often results in significant volatility and I think there is always that risk that there is a policy error and it ends the economic cycle,&#34; said Kristina Hooper, chief global market strategist at Invesco. &#34;So we just have a lot of apprehension.”</p><p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average    fell 339.82 points, or 0.96%, to 35,028.65, the S&amp;P 500    lost 44.35 points, or 0.97%, to 4,532.76 and the Nasdaq Composite    dropped 166.64 points, or 1.15%, to 14,340.26.</p><p>Consumer discretionary    fell most among S&amp;P 500 sectors, dropping 1.8%, while financials    dropped about 1.7% and technology    slid 1.4%.</p><p>The small-cap Russell 2000    fell 1.6%.</p><p>Stocks had tumbled on Tuesday, with the Nasdaq falling 2.6%, after weak results from Goldman Sachs and a spike in Treasury yields. U.S. Treasury yields eased on Wednesday from two-year highs.</p><p>Investors are looking to next week&#39;s Fed policy meeting for more clarity on central bankers&#39; plans to rein in inflation. Data last week showed U.S. consumer prices increased solidly in December, culminating in the largest annual rise in inflation in nearly four decades.</p><p>&#34;There&#39;s a fair amount of anxiety in terms of how the next three to six months are going to play out with a rate-hike cycle set to start likely in March,&#34; said Michael James, managing director of equity trading at Wedbush Securities in Los Angeles.</p><p>In company news, shares of Procter &amp; Gamble    rose 3.4% after the consumer goods company bumped up its annual sales forecast.</p><p>$Bank of America Corp(BAC-N)$    reported a better-than-expected 30% jump in quarterly profit, while Morgan Stanley    also reported fourth-quarter profit which beat market expectations, following uneven results from other banks. Bank of America shares rose 0.4%, while Morgan Stanley shares gained 1.8%.</p><p>Declining issues outnumbered advancing ones on the NYSE by a 2.06-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 2.09-to-1 ratio favored decliners.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 posted 13 new 52-week highs and seven new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 23 new highs and 630 new lows.</p><p>About 11.4 billion shares changed hands in U.S. exchanges, compared with the 10 billion daily average over the last 20 sessions.</p><p>Nasdaq confirms fourth correction since pandemic hit.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>US STOCKS-Wall Street Sell-Off Deepens, Nasdaq Confirms Correction</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nUS STOCKS-Wall Street Sell-Off Deepens, Nasdaq Confirms Correction\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-01-20 05:55</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>* Nasdaq now down 10.7% from Nov 19 record close</p><p>* BofA, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSTLW\">Morgan Stanley</a> wrap up bank earnings on upbeat note</p><p>* Procter &amp; Gamble gains after raising outlook</p><p>* Indexes down: Dow 0.96%, S&amp;P 0.97%, Nasdaq 1.15%</p><p>Jan 19 (Reuters) - Wall Street&#39;s main indexes ended sharply lower on Wednesday, with the tech-heavy Nasdaq confirming it was in a correction, after a diverse set of corporate earnings and as investors continued to worry about higher U.S. Treasury yields and the Federal Reserve tightening monetary policy.</p><p>The Nasdaq ended down 10.7% from its Nov. 19 closing record high, as stocks sold off into the market close. A correction is confirmed when an index closes 10% or more below its record closing level.</p><p>The Nasdaq&#39;s last correction was in early 2021, when the tech-heavy index fell more than 10% from Feb. 12 to March 8. It was the fourth time in the two years</p><p>since the coronavirus pandemic shook global markets that the index has found itself in a correction.</p><p>On Wednesday, Apple    shares fell 2.1%, weighing most on the Nasdaq, while declines in Tesla    and Amazon also dragged on the index.</p><p>Stocks have gotten off to a rocky start in 2022, as a fast rise in Treasury yields amid concerns the Fed will become aggressive in controlling inflation has particularly hit tech and growth shares. The benchmark S&amp;P 500 is down about 5% so far this year.</p><p>“Any beginning of tightening often results in significant volatility and I think there is always that risk that there is a policy error and it ends the economic cycle,&#34; said Kristina Hooper, chief global market strategist at Invesco. &#34;So we just have a lot of apprehension.”</p><p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average    fell 339.82 points, or 0.96%, to 35,028.65, the S&amp;P 500    lost 44.35 points, or 0.97%, to 4,532.76 and the Nasdaq Composite    dropped 166.64 points, or 1.15%, to 14,340.26.</p><p>Consumer discretionary    fell most among S&amp;P 500 sectors, dropping 1.8%, while financials    dropped about 1.7% and technology    slid 1.4%.</p><p>The small-cap Russell 2000    fell 1.6%.</p><p>Stocks had tumbled on Tuesday, with the Nasdaq falling 2.6%, after weak results from Goldman Sachs and a spike in Treasury yields. U.S. Treasury yields eased on Wednesday from two-year highs.</p><p>Investors are looking to next week&#39;s Fed policy meeting for more clarity on central bankers&#39; plans to rein in inflation. Data last week showed U.S. consumer prices increased solidly in December, culminating in the largest annual rise in inflation in nearly four decades.</p><p>&#34;There&#39;s a fair amount of anxiety in terms of how the next three to six months are going to play out with a rate-hike cycle set to start likely in March,&#34; said Michael James, managing director of equity trading at Wedbush Securities in Los Angeles.</p><p>In company news, shares of Procter &amp; Gamble    rose 3.4% after the consumer goods company bumped up its annual sales forecast.</p><p>$Bank of America Corp(BAC-N)$    reported a better-than-expected 30% jump in quarterly profit, while Morgan Stanley    also reported fourth-quarter profit which beat market expectations, following uneven results from other banks. Bank of America shares rose 0.4%, while Morgan Stanley shares gained 1.8%.</p><p>Declining issues outnumbered advancing ones on the NYSE by a 2.06-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 2.09-to-1 ratio favored decliners.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 posted 13 new 52-week highs and seven new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 23 new highs and 630 new lows.</p><p>About 11.4 billion shares changed hands in U.S. exchanges, compared with the 10 billion daily average over the last 20 sessions.</p><p>Nasdaq confirms fourth correction since pandemic hit.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2204320050","content_text":"* Nasdaq now down 10.7% from Nov 19 record close* BofA, Morgan Stanley wrap up bank earnings on upbeat note* Procter & Gamble gains after raising outlook* Indexes down: Dow 0.96%, S&P 0.97%, Nasdaq 1.15%Jan 19 (Reuters) - Wall Street's main indexes ended sharply lower on Wednesday, with the tech-heavy Nasdaq confirming it was in a correction, after a diverse set of corporate earnings and as investors continued to worry about higher U.S. Treasury yields and the Federal Reserve tightening monetary policy.The Nasdaq ended down 10.7% from its Nov. 19 closing record high, as stocks sold off into the market close. A correction is confirmed when an index closes 10% or more below its record closing level.The Nasdaq's last correction was in early 2021, when the tech-heavy index fell more than 10% from Feb. 12 to March 8. It was the fourth time in the two yearssince the coronavirus pandemic shook global markets that the index has found itself in a correction.On Wednesday, Apple    shares fell 2.1%, weighing most on the Nasdaq, while declines in Tesla    and Amazon also dragged on the index.Stocks have gotten off to a rocky start in 2022, as a fast rise in Treasury yields amid concerns the Fed will become aggressive in controlling inflation has particularly hit tech and growth shares. The benchmark S&P 500 is down about 5% so far this year.“Any beginning of tightening often results in significant volatility and I think there is always that risk that there is a policy error and it ends the economic cycle,\" said Kristina Hooper, chief global market strategist at Invesco. \"So we just have a lot of apprehension.”The Dow Jones Industrial Average    fell 339.82 points, or 0.96%, to 35,028.65, the S&P 500    lost 44.35 points, or 0.97%, to 4,532.76 and the Nasdaq Composite    dropped 166.64 points, or 1.15%, to 14,340.26.Consumer discretionary    fell most among S&P 500 sectors, dropping 1.8%, while financials    dropped about 1.7% and technology    slid 1.4%.The small-cap Russell 2000    fell 1.6%.Stocks had tumbled on Tuesday, with the Nasdaq falling 2.6%, after weak results from Goldman Sachs and a spike in Treasury yields. U.S. Treasury yields eased on Wednesday from two-year highs.Investors are looking to next week's Fed policy meeting for more clarity on central bankers' plans to rein in inflation. Data last week showed U.S. consumer prices increased solidly in December, culminating in the largest annual rise in inflation in nearly four decades.\"There's a fair amount of anxiety in terms of how the next three to six months are going to play out with a rate-hike cycle set to start likely in March,\" said Michael James, managing director of equity trading at Wedbush Securities in Los Angeles.In company news, shares of Procter & Gamble    rose 3.4% after the consumer goods company bumped up its annual sales forecast.$Bank of America Corp(BAC-N)$    reported a better-than-expected 30% jump in quarterly profit, while Morgan Stanley    also reported fourth-quarter profit which beat market expectations, following uneven results from other banks. Bank of America shares rose 0.4%, while Morgan Stanley shares gained 1.8%.Declining issues outnumbered advancing ones on the NYSE by a 2.06-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 2.09-to-1 ratio favored decliners.The S&P 500 posted 13 new 52-week highs and seven new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 23 new highs and 630 new lows.About 11.4 billion shares changed hands in U.S. exchanges, compared with the 10 billion daily average over the last 20 sessions.Nasdaq confirms fourth correction since pandemic hit.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":189,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9043347519,"gmtCreate":1655879725731,"gmtModify":1676535724744,"author":{"id":"3569553993868964","authorId":"3569553993868964","authorIdStr":"3569553993868964","name":"leejk","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13d40c01a9eef0aa4dc0a703e255de7a","crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3569553993868964"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/BS6.SI\">$YANGZIJIANG SHIPBLDG HLDGS LTD(BS6.SI)$</a>I","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/BS6.SI\">$YANGZIJIANG SHIPBLDG HLDGS LTD(BS6.SI)$</a>I","text":"$YANGZIJIANG SHIPBLDG HLDGS LTD(BS6.SI)$I","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/2b4395c1fa69eb6356fcf37912629ed5","width":"1170","height":"3066"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":1,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9043347519","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":715,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9013937651,"gmtCreate":1648678243712,"gmtModify":1676534374554,"author":{"id":"3569553993868964","authorId":"3569553993868964","authorIdStr":"3569553993868964","name":"leejk","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13d40c01a9eef0aa4dc0a703e255de7a","crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3569553993868964"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Thanks","listText":"Thanks","text":"Thanks","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9013937651","repostId":"2223950802","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2223950802","pubTimestamp":1648649952,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2223950802?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-03-30 22:19","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why Cathie Wood Just Dumped Tesla for This Hot EV Stock","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2223950802","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Cathie Wood makes a big move and buy Nio stock for the first time.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Famed investor Cathie Wood is a bull on electric vehicles (EVs), as the industry fits her policy of investing in disruption and innovation growth stories, including autonomous technology. In a recent interview  with <i>Barron&#39;s</i>, Wood even predicted EV sales to grow from 4.8 million units in 2021 to 40 million units in 2026.</p><p>Wood owns several EV stocks, but the one that&#39;s stood out so far is industry leader <b>Tesla</b>. Tesla is, in fact, Wood&#39;s largest holding -- the stock constituted 7.54% across all of Ark Invest&#39;s family of exchange-traded funds (Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETFs) as of March 28.</p><p>Yet, that&#39;s after Wood sold nearly 146,000 shares in Tesla on March 25. The last time Wood sold Tesla shares was in January.</p><p>What&#39;s even more surprising, though, is the EV stock Wood bought same day: <b>Nio</b>. The <b>Ark Autonomous Technology &amp; Robotics ETF</b> (ARKQ) reported a purchase transaction of 420,057 shares of Nio on March 25.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bb11f4ff477a5aa657c946261c8b83da\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"393\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Image source: Getty Images.</span></p><p>To be sure, trimming her Tesla position doesn&#39;t necessarily mean Wood&#39;s conviction on the stock has lessened. Yet the fact that she bought Nio stock for the first time ever deserves a lot more attention from investors as it confirms Wood&#39;s conviction in the Chinese EV stock.</p><h2>Why Nio caught Cathie Wood&#39;s attention</h2><p>Wood&#39;s interest in Tesla shouldn&#39;t come as a surprise. The company&#39;s foothold in the EV industry is hard to match and even catch up with, as Tesla already has nearly a million cars out on the roads and its sales have grown exponentially in recent years.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b2f525e4ebb4e2c40e0150bcf01ec7b9\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"700\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Image source: Statista.</span></p><p>Yet competition is heating up, and Wood seemingly doesn&#39;t want miss any opportunity EV companies other than Tesla can bring to the table. Nio is, in fact, often called the &#34;Tesla of China&#34; and has even said it aims to sell better products than Tesla but at lower costs.</p><p>The fact that Wood bought Nio stock just one day after the company&#39;s fourth-quarter and full-year 2021 earnings release suggests something in the report caught Wood&#39;s attention. I believe it&#39;s the EV maker&#39;s growth plans.</p><h2>Nio&#39;s big plans</h2><p>Nio expects to deliver 25,000-26,000 vehicles in the first quarter. That&#39;s roughly flat sequentially at the lower end of the guidance range and reflects the severe supply constraints facing the company.</p><p>Yet Nio isn&#39;t worried as much yet and has ruled out any plans to raise vehicle prices to pass on higher costs to consumers for now. Tesla, in contrast, recently raised prices of its EVs twice within a matter of days.</p><p>More importantly, despite the challenges, Nio is sticking with its plans to launch three EVs this year. The company is on track so far, having started deliveries of its flagship sedan, the ET7, on March 28. Nio plans to launch its first SUV, the ES7, in the coming weeks and its midsize sedan, the ET5, later in the year.</p><p>Nio&#39;s revenue should grow as it expands its product portfolio. In 2021, Nio generated $5.6 billion in revenue backed by deliveries of 91,429 vehicles. And Nio has already set foot outside of China and is targeting one of the world&#39;s largest EV markets next: Europe. Nio will enter at least four countries in Europe this year.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e327e3b1a66f10690e5ef105a1177dc3\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"520\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Image source: Statista.</span></p><p>In the long term, Nio plans to create a mass-market brand to build affordable EVs ranging between $30,000 to $50,000 per car.</p><h2>Path to profitability</h2><p>As a company that has its eyes set set on two of the world&#39;s largest EV markets, the growth potential for Nio is huge if can deliver on its plans. Nio also has a solid competitive advantage over its peers that could give it a lead especially during these inflationary times: its battery-as-a-service (BaaS) program.</p><p>BaaS offers potential customers the option to save thousands of dollars by buying cars without batteries and instead paying a monthly subscription fee to swap and charge batteries on demand at Nio&#39;s swap stations. As of March 20, Nio had 864 battery swap stations and 760 supercharging stations in China, according to new energy vehicle (NEV)-focused website CnEvPost.</p><p>Nio&#39;s agility was also on full display when it quickly listed its stock in Hong Kong in early March as the threat of having Chinese stocks delisted from the U.S. deepened.</p><p>Most importantly, Nio just said it could break even as early as the fourth quarter of 2023 and deliver its first full year of profit in 2024.</p><p>In an industry where scaling up production profitably is an uphill task, Nio sounds confident about its capabilities. That&#39;s what seems to have caught Cathie Wood&#39;s attention, and she evidently bought the dip in this hot EV stock.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why Cathie Wood Just Dumped Tesla for This Hot EV Stock</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy Cathie Wood Just Dumped Tesla for This Hot EV Stock\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-03-30 22:19 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/03/30/why-cathie-wood-dumped-tesla-for-this-hot-ev-stock/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Famed investor Cathie Wood is a bull on electric vehicles (EVs), as the industry fits her policy of investing in disruption and innovation growth stories, including autonomous technology. In a recent ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/03/30/why-cathie-wood-dumped-tesla-for-this-hot-ev-stock/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BK4581":"高盛持仓","BK4533":"AQR资本管理(全球第二大对冲基金)","BK4555":"新能源车","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓","BK4511":"特斯拉概念","BK4099":"汽车制造商","NIO":"蔚来","BK4574":"无人驾驶","TSLA":"特斯拉","BK4551":"寇图资本持仓","BK4548":"巴美列捷福持仓","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","BK4527":"明星科技股"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/03/30/why-cathie-wood-dumped-tesla-for-this-hot-ev-stock/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2223950802","content_text":"Famed investor Cathie Wood is a bull on electric vehicles (EVs), as the industry fits her policy of investing in disruption and innovation growth stories, including autonomous technology. In a recent interview  with Barron's, Wood even predicted EV sales to grow from 4.8 million units in 2021 to 40 million units in 2026.Wood owns several EV stocks, but the one that's stood out so far is industry leader Tesla. Tesla is, in fact, Wood's largest holding -- the stock constituted 7.54% across all of Ark Invest's family of exchange-traded funds (Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETFs) as of March 28.Yet, that's after Wood sold nearly 146,000 shares in Tesla on March 25. The last time Wood sold Tesla shares was in January.What's even more surprising, though, is the EV stock Wood bought same day: Nio. The Ark Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ) reported a purchase transaction of 420,057 shares of Nio on March 25.Image source: Getty Images.To be sure, trimming her Tesla position doesn't necessarily mean Wood's conviction on the stock has lessened. Yet the fact that she bought Nio stock for the first time ever deserves a lot more attention from investors as it confirms Wood's conviction in the Chinese EV stock.Why Nio caught Cathie Wood's attentionWood's interest in Tesla shouldn't come as a surprise. The company's foothold in the EV industry is hard to match and even catch up with, as Tesla already has nearly a million cars out on the roads and its sales have grown exponentially in recent years.Image source: Statista.Yet competition is heating up, and Wood seemingly doesn't want miss any opportunity EV companies other than Tesla can bring to the table. Nio is, in fact, often called the \"Tesla of China\" and has even said it aims to sell better products than Tesla but at lower costs.The fact that Wood bought Nio stock just one day after the company's fourth-quarter and full-year 2021 earnings release suggests something in the report caught Wood's attention. I believe it's the EV maker's growth plans.Nio's big plansNio expects to deliver 25,000-26,000 vehicles in the first quarter. That's roughly flat sequentially at the lower end of the guidance range and reflects the severe supply constraints facing the company.Yet Nio isn't worried as much yet and has ruled out any plans to raise vehicle prices to pass on higher costs to consumers for now. Tesla, in contrast, recently raised prices of its EVs twice within a matter of days.More importantly, despite the challenges, Nio is sticking with its plans to launch three EVs this year. The company is on track so far, having started deliveries of its flagship sedan, the ET7, on March 28. Nio plans to launch its first SUV, the ES7, in the coming weeks and its midsize sedan, the ET5, later in the year.Nio's revenue should grow as it expands its product portfolio. In 2021, Nio generated $5.6 billion in revenue backed by deliveries of 91,429 vehicles. And Nio has already set foot outside of China and is targeting one of the world's largest EV markets next: Europe. Nio will enter at least four countries in Europe this year.Image source: Statista.In the long term, Nio plans to create a mass-market brand to build affordable EVs ranging between $30,000 to $50,000 per car.Path to profitabilityAs a company that has its eyes set set on two of the world's largest EV markets, the growth potential for Nio is huge if can deliver on its plans. Nio also has a solid competitive advantage over its peers that could give it a lead especially during these inflationary times: its battery-as-a-service (BaaS) program.BaaS offers potential customers the option to save thousands of dollars by buying cars without batteries and instead paying a monthly subscription fee to swap and charge batteries on demand at Nio's swap stations. As of March 20, Nio had 864 battery swap stations and 760 supercharging stations in China, according to new energy vehicle (NEV)-focused website CnEvPost.Nio's agility was also on full display when it quickly listed its stock in Hong Kong in early March as the threat of having Chinese stocks delisted from the U.S. deepened.Most importantly, Nio just said it could break even as early as the fourth quarter of 2023 and deliver its first full year of profit in 2024.In an industry where scaling up production profitably is an uphill task, Nio sounds confident about its capabilities. That's what seems to have caught Cathie Wood's attention, and she evidently bought the dip in this hot EV stock.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":25,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9090636796,"gmtCreate":1643161691671,"gmtModify":1676533780653,"author":{"id":"3569553993868964","authorId":"3569553993868964","authorIdStr":"3569553993868964","name":"leejk","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13d40c01a9eef0aa4dc0a703e255de7a","crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3569553993868964"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Thanks","listText":"Thanks","text":"Thanks","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9090636796","repostId":"2206103855","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2206103855","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1643151600,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2206103855?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-01-26 07:00","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Wall Street Ends down as Markets Whipsaw Ahead of Fed Meeting","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2206103855","media":"Reuters","summary":"* Microsoft gains in after-hours trading after results* American Express, IBM rise on strong earning","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>* Microsoft gains in after-hours trading after results</p><p>* American Express, IBM rise on strong earnings</p><p>* Indexes down: Dow 0.19%, S&amp;P 1.22%, Nasdaq 2.28%</p><p>NEW YORK, Jan 25 (Reuters) - U.S. stocks gyrated in afternoon trading to close lower with interest rate sensitive tech stocks weighing most heavily as uncertainties surrounding an increasingly hawkish Federal Reserve and rising geopolitical tensions contributed to the market&#39;s churn.</p><p>In a pattern similar to Monday, U.S. stocks whipsawed between steep losses and modest gains. Equities ended well off session lows, where the S&amp;P 500 flirted once again with confirming a correction.</p><p>All three major U.S. stock indexes closed lower.</p><p>If the bellwether index closed 10% or more below its record high reached on Jan 3, it would have confirmed it entered a correction on that date. It ended the session 9.2% below that level.</p><p>&#34;We’re floating along this arbitrary 10% line, and investors are asking. &#39;Is it time to protect my capital by selling or is it time to buy the dip?&#39;,&#34; said Tom Martin, senior portfolio manager at GLOBALT in Atlanta. &#34;And between yesterday with downward and upward movement you have this battle between the two.&#34;</p><p>The CBOE Market Volatility index closed at its highest level since Jan. 29, 2021.</p><p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 66.77 points, or 0.19%, to 34,297.73, the S&amp;P 500 lost 53.68 points, or 1.22%, to 4,356.45 and the Nasdaq Composite dropped 315.83 points, or 2.28%, to 13,539.30.</p><p>The members of the Federal Open Markets Committee (FOMC) convened on Tuesday for their two-day monetary policy meeting. Market participants on Wednesday will scrutinize the statement at the meeting&#39;s conclusion, along with Chairman Jerome Powell&#39;s subsequent Q&amp;A session, for clarity regarding the central bank&#39;s timeline for hiking key interest rates to combat inflation.</p><p>&#34;Certainly, the economic data of late shows some weakening,&#34; Martin added. &#34;You would think there might be a more dovish message from the Fed.&#34;</p><p>Geopolitical tensions are adding to investor uncertainty, with NATO putting forces on standby and the United States putting troops on heightened alert in response to a buildup of Russian forces along Ukraine border.</p><p>Those tensions prompted a rise in crude oil prices on concerns over tightening supply  , which in turn gave energy companies    a solid boost.</p><p>Energy was the top gainer among the 11 major sectors in the S&amp;P 500, with tech shares suffering the largest percentage decline.</p><p>The fourth-quarter reporting season is in full-stride, with 79 of the companies in the S&amp;P 500 having reported. Of those, 81% have delivered better-than-expected results, according to Refinitiv. But there have been notable misses, such as Netflix.</p><p>Analysts now see aggregate S&amp;P 500 earnings growth of 24.1% for the October-December period, per Refinitiv.</p><p>General Electric Co fell 6.0% after the industrial conglomerate, weighed down by global supply disruptions, reported a decline quarterly revenue.</p><p>IBM advanced 5.7% after the IT giant beat quarterly Wall Street estimates on strength in its cloud and consulting businesses.</p><p>American Express exceeded fourth-quarter profit estimates, sending the consumer credit company&#39;s stock up 8.9%, while Johnson &amp; Johnson gained 2.9% after reporting it expects a jump of as much as 46% in 2022 vaccine sales.</p><p>Shares of Microsoft climbed 3% after plunging 6% at one point in extended trading after the software maker reported its quarterly results.</p><p>Declining issues outnumbered advancing ones on the NYSE by a 1.34-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 1.53-to-1 ratio favored decliners.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 posted seven new 52-week highs and four new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 19 new highs and 134 new lows.</p><p>Volume on U.S. exchanges was 13.13 billion shares, compared with the 11.23 billion average over the last 20 trading days.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Wall Street Ends down as Markets Whipsaw Ahead of Fed Meeting</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWall Street Ends down as Markets Whipsaw Ahead of Fed Meeting\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-01-26 07:00</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>* Microsoft gains in after-hours trading after results</p><p>* American Express, IBM rise on strong earnings</p><p>* Indexes down: Dow 0.19%, S&amp;P 1.22%, Nasdaq 2.28%</p><p>NEW YORK, Jan 25 (Reuters) - U.S. stocks gyrated in afternoon trading to close lower with interest rate sensitive tech stocks weighing most heavily as uncertainties surrounding an increasingly hawkish Federal Reserve and rising geopolitical tensions contributed to the market&#39;s churn.</p><p>In a pattern similar to Monday, U.S. stocks whipsawed between steep losses and modest gains. Equities ended well off session lows, where the S&amp;P 500 flirted once again with confirming a correction.</p><p>All three major U.S. stock indexes closed lower.</p><p>If the bellwether index closed 10% or more below its record high reached on Jan 3, it would have confirmed it entered a correction on that date. It ended the session 9.2% below that level.</p><p>&#34;We’re floating along this arbitrary 10% line, and investors are asking. &#39;Is it time to protect my capital by selling or is it time to buy the dip?&#39;,&#34; said Tom Martin, senior portfolio manager at GLOBALT in Atlanta. &#34;And between yesterday with downward and upward movement you have this battle between the two.&#34;</p><p>The CBOE Market Volatility index closed at its highest level since Jan. 29, 2021.</p><p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 66.77 points, or 0.19%, to 34,297.73, the S&amp;P 500 lost 53.68 points, or 1.22%, to 4,356.45 and the Nasdaq Composite dropped 315.83 points, or 2.28%, to 13,539.30.</p><p>The members of the Federal Open Markets Committee (FOMC) convened on Tuesday for their two-day monetary policy meeting. Market participants on Wednesday will scrutinize the statement at the meeting&#39;s conclusion, along with Chairman Jerome Powell&#39;s subsequent Q&amp;A session, for clarity regarding the central bank&#39;s timeline for hiking key interest rates to combat inflation.</p><p>&#34;Certainly, the economic data of late shows some weakening,&#34; Martin added. &#34;You would think there might be a more dovish message from the Fed.&#34;</p><p>Geopolitical tensions are adding to investor uncertainty, with NATO putting forces on standby and the United States putting troops on heightened alert in response to a buildup of Russian forces along Ukraine border.</p><p>Those tensions prompted a rise in crude oil prices on concerns over tightening supply  , which in turn gave energy companies    a solid boost.</p><p>Energy was the top gainer among the 11 major sectors in the S&amp;P 500, with tech shares suffering the largest percentage decline.</p><p>The fourth-quarter reporting season is in full-stride, with 79 of the companies in the S&amp;P 500 having reported. Of those, 81% have delivered better-than-expected results, according to Refinitiv. But there have been notable misses, such as Netflix.</p><p>Analysts now see aggregate S&amp;P 500 earnings growth of 24.1% for the October-December period, per Refinitiv.</p><p>General Electric Co fell 6.0% after the industrial conglomerate, weighed down by global supply disruptions, reported a decline quarterly revenue.</p><p>IBM advanced 5.7% after the IT giant beat quarterly Wall Street estimates on strength in its cloud and consulting businesses.</p><p>American Express exceeded fourth-quarter profit estimates, sending the consumer credit company&#39;s stock up 8.9%, while Johnson &amp; Johnson gained 2.9% after reporting it expects a jump of as much as 46% in 2022 vaccine sales.</p><p>Shares of Microsoft climbed 3% after plunging 6% at one point in extended trading after the software maker reported its quarterly results.</p><p>Declining issues outnumbered advancing ones on the NYSE by a 1.34-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 1.53-to-1 ratio favored decliners.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 posted seven new 52-week highs and four new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 19 new highs and 134 new lows.</p><p>Volume on U.S. exchanges was 13.13 billion shares, compared with the 11.23 billion average over the last 20 trading days.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","BK4567":"ESG概念","BK4533":"AQR资本管理(全球第二大对冲基金)","MSFT":"微软","BK4566":"资本集团","BK4525":"远程办公概念","BK4535":"淡马锡持仓","BK4538":"云计算","BK4077":"互动媒体与服务","BK4527":"明星科技股","BK4559":"巴菲特持仓","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓","BK4503":"景林资产持仓",".DJI":"道琼斯","BK4134":"信息科技咨询与其它服务",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite","SPY":"标普500ETF","BK4097":"系统软件",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","BK4532":"文艺复兴科技持仓","BK4504":"桥水持仓","IBM":"IBM","BK4548":"巴美列捷福持仓","FOMC":"FOMO CORP.","BK4516":"特朗普概念","BK4528":"SaaS概念","BK4554":"元宇宙及AR概念"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2206103855","content_text":"* Microsoft gains in after-hours trading after results* American Express, IBM rise on strong earnings* Indexes down: Dow 0.19%, S&P 1.22%, Nasdaq 2.28%NEW YORK, Jan 25 (Reuters) - U.S. stocks gyrated in afternoon trading to close lower with interest rate sensitive tech stocks weighing most heavily as uncertainties surrounding an increasingly hawkish Federal Reserve and rising geopolitical tensions contributed to the market's churn.In a pattern similar to Monday, U.S. stocks whipsawed between steep losses and modest gains. Equities ended well off session lows, where the S&P 500 flirted once again with confirming a correction.All three major U.S. stock indexes closed lower.If the bellwether index closed 10% or more below its record high reached on Jan 3, it would have confirmed it entered a correction on that date. It ended the session 9.2% below that level.\"We’re floating along this arbitrary 10% line, and investors are asking. 'Is it time to protect my capital by selling or is it time to buy the dip?',\" said Tom Martin, senior portfolio manager at GLOBALT in Atlanta. \"And between yesterday with downward and upward movement you have this battle between the two.\"The CBOE Market Volatility index closed at its highest level since Jan. 29, 2021.The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 66.77 points, or 0.19%, to 34,297.73, the S&P 500 lost 53.68 points, or 1.22%, to 4,356.45 and the Nasdaq Composite dropped 315.83 points, or 2.28%, to 13,539.30.The members of the Federal Open Markets Committee (FOMC) convened on Tuesday for their two-day monetary policy meeting. Market participants on Wednesday will scrutinize the statement at the meeting's conclusion, along with Chairman Jerome Powell's subsequent Q&A session, for clarity regarding the central bank's timeline for hiking key interest rates to combat inflation.\"Certainly, the economic data of late shows some weakening,\" Martin added. \"You would think there might be a more dovish message from the Fed.\"Geopolitical tensions are adding to investor uncertainty, with NATO putting forces on standby and the United States putting troops on heightened alert in response to a buildup of Russian forces along Ukraine border.Those tensions prompted a rise in crude oil prices on concerns over tightening supply  , which in turn gave energy companies    a solid boost.Energy was the top gainer among the 11 major sectors in the S&P 500, with tech shares suffering the largest percentage decline.The fourth-quarter reporting season is in full-stride, with 79 of the companies in the S&P 500 having reported. Of those, 81% have delivered better-than-expected results, according to Refinitiv. But there have been notable misses, such as Netflix.Analysts now see aggregate S&P 500 earnings growth of 24.1% for the October-December period, per Refinitiv.General Electric Co fell 6.0% after the industrial conglomerate, weighed down by global supply disruptions, reported a decline quarterly revenue.IBM advanced 5.7% after the IT giant beat quarterly Wall Street estimates on strength in its cloud and consulting businesses.American Express exceeded fourth-quarter profit estimates, sending the consumer credit company's stock up 8.9%, while Johnson & Johnson gained 2.9% after reporting it expects a jump of as much as 46% in 2022 vaccine sales.Shares of Microsoft climbed 3% after plunging 6% at one point in extended trading after the software maker reported its quarterly results.Declining issues outnumbered advancing ones on the NYSE by a 1.34-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 1.53-to-1 ratio favored decliners.The S&P 500 posted seven new 52-week highs and four new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 19 new highs and 134 new lows.Volume on U.S. exchanges was 13.13 billion shares, compared with the 11.23 billion average over the last 20 trading days.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":226,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9028386247,"gmtCreate":1653176115089,"gmtModify":1676535233256,"author":{"id":"3569553993868964","authorId":"3569553993868964","authorIdStr":"3569553993868964","name":"leejk","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13d40c01a9eef0aa4dc0a703e255de7a","crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3569553993868964"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Thanks","listText":"Thanks","text":"Thanks","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9028386247","repostId":"2236012808","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2236012808","pubTimestamp":1653089869,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2236012808?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-05-21 07:37","market":"us","language":"en","title":"It's Down Almost 40% Year to Date -- Should Investors Buy Tesla Stock?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2236012808","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"As the broader market continues to fall, some investors may view the EV leader's stock slump as a buying opportunity. Are they right?","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>After joining the $1 trillion market capitalization club at the end of 2021, shares of electric vehicle (EV) juggernaut <b>Tesla</b> have shifted into reverse. Between macroeconomic headwinds like 40-year-high inflation, the Fed&#39;s consequent move to raise interest rates, and concerns about the war between Russia and Ukraine, the stock market has been in quite the frenzy.</p><p>Many high-growth stocks, Tesla included, have been humbled lately as investors seek protection by shifting their attention to value companies and safer assets. CEO Elon Musk&#39;s move to potentially acquire <b>Twitter</b> certainly hasn&#39;t aided the company&#39;s case, either. With uncertainty around whether or not the deal will actually close, investors have raced to dump shares of the EV leader.</p><p>But in terms of fundamentals, Tesla continues to look dominant. The company is rapidly expanding its business on all fronts and has strengthened its balance sheet and cash generation in the process. With the stock down almost 40% year to date, should investors pull the trigger on buying Tesla today?</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ecb47944e9c0966d2182e999d9a81cba\"/><span>Image source: Getty Images.</span></p><h2>Fundamentals aren&#39;t the problem</h2><p>In a quarter when investors weren&#39;t sure what to expect due to COVID-19-related shutdowns at Tesla&#39;s Shanghai factory, the EV leader delivered, and it delivered big. The company&#39;s $18.8 billion in total sales, which climbed 81% year over year, beat Wall Street expectations by $918 million. Likewise, its non-GAAP earnings per share of $3.22, equal to 246% growth, crushed consensus estimates by a whopping 42%.</p><p>To top off a record quarter, the Musk-led enterprise grew total production and vehicle deliveries by a respective 69% and 68%, producing 305,407 vehicles and delivering 310,048. Per management&#39;s guidance, investors can expect the company to achieve 50% average annual growth in deliveries over a multi-year time horizon. In fiscal 2022, analysts are modeling a top line and adjusted bottom line of $86.5 billion and $12.32/share, translating to robust year-over-year ascents of 61% and 82%, respectively.</p><p>Amid such incredible growth, the company&#39;s balance sheet and cash generation are equally thriving. In its latest quarter, the EV commander revealed that total debt excluding vehicle and energy product financing fell below $100 million. The company is manifesting the &#34;cash is king&#34; mantra as well: In the first quarter, free cash flow surged an astonishing 660% to $2.2 billion. Provided that the global EV market is projected to expand at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 25% through 2028 to nearly $1 trillion, it could be said with exceedingly high confidence that Tesla is poised for more success in the coming years.</p><h2>Tesla&#39;s valuation is still high</h2><p>Even without context, though, Tesla&#39;s valuation is extremely high. The stock is trading at 98.2 times earnings at the moment, an extremely lofty multiple even post-correction.</p><p>Comparing the EV behemoth to other automobile manufacturers further underscores its expensive stock price. As seen in the below chart, competitors <b>General Motors </b>(GM 0.81%), <b>Ford</b> (F 0.55%), and <b>Toyota </b>(TM 0.26%) have price-to-earnings multiples of 6.2, 4.6, and 7.9, respectively. Whether or not Tesla deserves a premium valuation is a frequent debate among the bulls and the bears. However, it&#39;s rather indisputable that the EV stock is richly priced. It would take a major share price collapse for Tesla to truly be considered cheap.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4664e23d164238b9ae09f5957b8e89b9\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"387\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>TSLA PE Ratio data by YCharts</span></p><h2>Should investors buy the stock now?</h2><p>Tesla&#39;s pullback has certainly grabbed my attention -- the company is the unequivocal pacesetter in the EV market, an industry that is still in the earlier innings of development. That said, the company&#39;s valuation isn&#39;t exactly attractive yet, and it would take far more downward pressure to make the stock appear cheap. Investors should keep a close eye on Tesla moving forward, as there&#39;s surely a chance it&#39;ll continue on a downward path in the periods ahead.</p><p>While it&#39;s a fantastic company and a sure winner in the EV space, I don&#39;t suggest buying the stock just yet. Take advantage of the recent tech sell-off and look for other companies that carry more enticing valuations today.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>It's Down Almost 40% Year to Date -- Should Investors Buy Tesla Stock?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nIt's Down Almost 40% Year to Date -- Should Investors Buy Tesla Stock?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-05-21 07:37 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/05/20/its-down-almost-40-year-to-date-should-investors-b/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>After joining the $1 trillion market capitalization club at the end of 2021, shares of electric vehicle (EV) juggernaut Tesla have shifted into reverse. Between macroeconomic headwinds like 40-year-...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/05/20/its-down-almost-40-year-to-date-should-investors-b/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/05/20/its-down-almost-40-year-to-date-should-investors-b/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2236012808","content_text":"After joining the $1 trillion market capitalization club at the end of 2021, shares of electric vehicle (EV) juggernaut Tesla have shifted into reverse. Between macroeconomic headwinds like 40-year-high inflation, the Fed's consequent move to raise interest rates, and concerns about the war between Russia and Ukraine, the stock market has been in quite the frenzy.Many high-growth stocks, Tesla included, have been humbled lately as investors seek protection by shifting their attention to value companies and safer assets. CEO Elon Musk's move to potentially acquire Twitter certainly hasn't aided the company's case, either. With uncertainty around whether or not the deal will actually close, investors have raced to dump shares of the EV leader.But in terms of fundamentals, Tesla continues to look dominant. The company is rapidly expanding its business on all fronts and has strengthened its balance sheet and cash generation in the process. With the stock down almost 40% year to date, should investors pull the trigger on buying Tesla today?Image source: Getty Images.Fundamentals aren't the problemIn a quarter when investors weren't sure what to expect due to COVID-19-related shutdowns at Tesla's Shanghai factory, the EV leader delivered, and it delivered big. The company's $18.8 billion in total sales, which climbed 81% year over year, beat Wall Street expectations by $918 million. Likewise, its non-GAAP earnings per share of $3.22, equal to 246% growth, crushed consensus estimates by a whopping 42%.To top off a record quarter, the Musk-led enterprise grew total production and vehicle deliveries by a respective 69% and 68%, producing 305,407 vehicles and delivering 310,048. Per management's guidance, investors can expect the company to achieve 50% average annual growth in deliveries over a multi-year time horizon. In fiscal 2022, analysts are modeling a top line and adjusted bottom line of $86.5 billion and $12.32/share, translating to robust year-over-year ascents of 61% and 82%, respectively.Amid such incredible growth, the company's balance sheet and cash generation are equally thriving. In its latest quarter, the EV commander revealed that total debt excluding vehicle and energy product financing fell below $100 million. The company is manifesting the \"cash is king\" mantra as well: In the first quarter, free cash flow surged an astonishing 660% to $2.2 billion. Provided that the global EV market is projected to expand at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 25% through 2028 to nearly $1 trillion, it could be said with exceedingly high confidence that Tesla is poised for more success in the coming years.Tesla's valuation is still highEven without context, though, Tesla's valuation is extremely high. The stock is trading at 98.2 times earnings at the moment, an extremely lofty multiple even post-correction.Comparing the EV behemoth to other automobile manufacturers further underscores its expensive stock price. As seen in the below chart, competitors General Motors (GM 0.81%), Ford (F 0.55%), and Toyota (TM 0.26%) have price-to-earnings multiples of 6.2, 4.6, and 7.9, respectively. Whether or not Tesla deserves a premium valuation is a frequent debate among the bulls and the bears. However, it's rather indisputable that the EV stock is richly priced. It would take a major share price collapse for Tesla to truly be considered cheap.TSLA PE Ratio data by YChartsShould investors buy the stock now?Tesla's pullback has certainly grabbed my attention -- the company is the unequivocal pacesetter in the EV market, an industry that is still in the earlier innings of development. That said, the company's valuation isn't exactly attractive yet, and it would take far more downward pressure to make the stock appear cheap. Investors should keep a close eye on Tesla moving forward, as there's surely a chance it'll continue on a downward path in the periods ahead.While it's a fantastic company and a sure winner in the EV space, I don't suggest buying the stock just yet. Take advantage of the recent tech sell-off and look for other companies that carry more enticing valuations today.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":40,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9067404082,"gmtCreate":1652493718646,"gmtModify":1676535111414,"author":{"id":"3569553993868964","authorId":"3569553993868964","authorIdStr":"3569553993868964","name":"leejk","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13d40c01a9eef0aa4dc0a703e255de7a","crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3569553993868964"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Thanks","listText":"Thanks","text":"Thanks","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9067404082","repostId":"1176148703","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1176148703","pubTimestamp":1652488034,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1176148703?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-05-14 08:27","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Will the LUNA Crypto Recover? What Analysts Are Saying About the Future of Terra","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1176148703","media":"investorplace","summary":"As Terra(LUNA-USD) prices continue dropping, investors might be convinced this is the end of the LUN","content":"<html><head></head><body><ul><li>As <b>Terra</b>(<b>LUNA-USD</b>) prices continue dropping, investors might be convinced this is the end of the LUNA crypto</li><li>Founder Do Kwon says developers are working diligently to right the network</li><li>Analysts are torn over whether LUNA prices will ever recover</li></ul><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ae9916c23f2f928ab45c1902098e97c8\" tg-width=\"1600\" tg-height=\"900\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: David Sandron / Shutterstock.com</p><p>It’s difficult to have faith in Terra at this point. The network is the talk of crypto bulls and crypto bears alike in the face of a major price meltdown this week. Those still invested are either buying in while prices are incredibly low, or they’ve lost so much they are just hoping for a miracle. Is LUNA going to come back from this?</p><p>Do Kwon, the founder of the Terra network, sure seems to think so. Kwon has been trying to assuage investors since the projectbegan to seriously tank. He is doing this through the developers’three-pronged approachto salvaging the product.</p><p>The first two parts of the plan involve a large <b>TerraUSD</b>(<b>UST-USD</b>) burn, in order to stabilize the token back at $1. Over 371 million UST on the <b>Ethereum</b>(<b><u>ETH-USD</u></b>) network will be burned, as will all UST remaining in the Terra community pool. The third prong of this plan involves staking 240 million LUNA to stabilize governance and keep a whale from seizing control over the network.</p><p>Atop these plans, the developers are also taking on a community proposal to increase the burn rate of UST. Moreover, they temporarilyhalted the blockchain completely, freezing all unsettled transactions. This was to prevent users from taking advantage of the low price of LUNA and buying it all up at once.</p><h2>Will the LUNA Crypto Recover? Analysts Can’t Decide.</h2><p>While the LUNA crypto is now trading at only a fraction of 1 cent, investors might be throwing their hands up in the air. Can this bailout plan save the Terra network?</p><p>Many have their doubts. It seems that most talk about the network online is quite negative, with lots of investors already considering the project dead. <i>The Motley Fool’s</i>Trevor Jennewine isadvising investors steer clear of LUNAnow, even with its exceptionally low cost. Price predicting websites like<i>CoinPriceForecast</i>and <i>DigitalCoinPrice</i>see no growth opportunities for the network on the horizon either. The two sites predict an end-of-year price of 6 cents and less than 1 cent, respectively, for LUNA.</p><p>There are others still with some hope still for the network. Crypto analysis website <i>InvestingCube</i>said that a LUNA crypto price recoverycould very well be a possibility. The report suggests that UST returning to $1 could catalyze a LUNA gain, allowing it to regain its footing. Price prediction site <i>WalletInvestor</i>is remaining extremely bullish with its 12-month LUNA prediction. It expects the coin to reach $151 by May 2023. Meanwhile, peer outlet<i>Gov Capital</i>is predicting a $108 price for the coin in the same time frame.</p></body></html>","source":"lsy1606302653667","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Will the LUNA Crypto Recover? What Analysts Are Saying About the Future of Terra</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWill the LUNA Crypto Recover? What Analysts Are Saying About the Future of Terra\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-05-14 08:27 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://investorplace.com/2022/05/will-the-luna-crypto-recover-what-analysts-are-saying-about-the-future-of-terra/><strong>investorplace</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>As Terra(LUNA-USD) prices continue dropping, investors might be convinced this is the end of the LUNA cryptoFounder Do Kwon says developers are working diligently to right the networkAnalysts are torn...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://investorplace.com/2022/05/will-the-luna-crypto-recover-what-analysts-are-saying-about-the-future-of-terra/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://investorplace.com/2022/05/will-the-luna-crypto-recover-what-analysts-are-saying-about-the-future-of-terra/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1176148703","content_text":"As Terra(LUNA-USD) prices continue dropping, investors might be convinced this is the end of the LUNA cryptoFounder Do Kwon says developers are working diligently to right the networkAnalysts are torn over whether LUNA prices will ever recoverSource: David Sandron / Shutterstock.comIt’s difficult to have faith in Terra at this point. The network is the talk of crypto bulls and crypto bears alike in the face of a major price meltdown this week. Those still invested are either buying in while prices are incredibly low, or they’ve lost so much they are just hoping for a miracle. Is LUNA going to come back from this?Do Kwon, the founder of the Terra network, sure seems to think so. Kwon has been trying to assuage investors since the projectbegan to seriously tank. He is doing this through the developers’three-pronged approachto salvaging the product.The first two parts of the plan involve a large TerraUSD(UST-USD) burn, in order to stabilize the token back at $1. Over 371 million UST on the Ethereum(ETH-USD) network will be burned, as will all UST remaining in the Terra community pool. The third prong of this plan involves staking 240 million LUNA to stabilize governance and keep a whale from seizing control over the network.Atop these plans, the developers are also taking on a community proposal to increase the burn rate of UST. Moreover, they temporarilyhalted the blockchain completely, freezing all unsettled transactions. This was to prevent users from taking advantage of the low price of LUNA and buying it all up at once.Will the LUNA Crypto Recover? Analysts Can’t Decide.While the LUNA crypto is now trading at only a fraction of 1 cent, investors might be throwing their hands up in the air. Can this bailout plan save the Terra network?Many have their doubts. It seems that most talk about the network online is quite negative, with lots of investors already considering the project dead. The Motley Fool’sTrevor Jennewine isadvising investors steer clear of LUNAnow, even with its exceptionally low cost. Price predicting websites likeCoinPriceForecastand DigitalCoinPricesee no growth opportunities for the network on the horizon either. The two sites predict an end-of-year price of 6 cents and less than 1 cent, respectively, for LUNA.There are others still with some hope still for the network. Crypto analysis website InvestingCubesaid that a LUNA crypto price recoverycould very well be a possibility. The report suggests that UST returning to $1 could catalyze a LUNA gain, allowing it to regain its footing. Price prediction site WalletInvestoris remaining extremely bullish with its 12-month LUNA prediction. It expects the coin to reach $151 by May 2023. Meanwhile, peer outletGov Capitalis predicting a $108 price for the coin in the same time frame.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":16,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9088820078,"gmtCreate":1650331445292,"gmtModify":1676534698209,"author":{"id":"3569553993868964","authorId":"3569553993868964","authorIdStr":"3569553993868964","name":"leejk","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13d40c01a9eef0aa4dc0a703e255de7a","crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3569553993868964"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/E28.SI\">$FRENCKEN GROUP LIMITED(E28.SI)$</a>Hmmm","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/E28.SI\">$FRENCKEN GROUP LIMITED(E28.SI)$</a>Hmmm","text":"$FRENCKEN GROUP LIMITED(E28.SI)$Hmmm","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/ff65ce10539789b9c68d224cf5d29a1e","width":"1125","height":"2949"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9088820078","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":108,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9990595994,"gmtCreate":1660363682720,"gmtModify":1676533459945,"author":{"id":"3569553993868964","authorId":"3569553993868964","authorIdStr":"3569553993868964","name":"leejk","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13d40c01a9eef0aa4dc0a703e255de7a","crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3569553993868964"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/OPT/META 20220812 155.0 PUT\">$META 20220812 155.0 PUT$</a>H","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/OPT/META 20220812 155.0 PUT\">$META 20220812 155.0 PUT$</a>H","text":"$META 20220812 155.0 PUT$H","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/1e385f9c24b12a8567f7b66538bc6dc8","width":"1170","height":"2292"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9990595994","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":20,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9041912379,"gmtCreate":1655994196991,"gmtModify":1676535746775,"author":{"id":"3569553993868964","authorId":"3569553993868964","authorIdStr":"3569553993868964","name":"leejk","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13d40c01a9eef0aa4dc0a703e255de7a","crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3569553993868964"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/SMH\">$VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF(SMH)$</a>H","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/SMH\">$VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF(SMH)$</a>H","text":"$VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF(SMH)$H","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/454650e564f75ba4094d9116d3709d17","width":"1170","height":"2292"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9041912379","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":62,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9052583091,"gmtCreate":1655194877813,"gmtModify":1676535579318,"author":{"id":"3569553993868964","authorId":"3569553993868964","authorIdStr":"3569553993868964","name":"leejk","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13d40c01a9eef0aa4dc0a703e255de7a","crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3569553993868964"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/SOXQ\">$Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF(SOXQ)$</a>H","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/SOXQ\">$Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF(SOXQ)$</a>H","text":"$Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF(SOXQ)$H","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/d905f6c61a1a7739a8e09bbe7555184b","width":"1170","height":"2292"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9052583091","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":22,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9029878544,"gmtCreate":1652759876488,"gmtModify":1676535156923,"author":{"id":"3569553993868964","authorId":"3569553993868964","authorIdStr":"3569553993868964","name":"leejk","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13d40c01a9eef0aa4dc0a703e255de7a","crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3569553993868964"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Thanks","listText":"Thanks","text":"Thanks","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9029878544","repostId":"1167257580","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1167257580","pubTimestamp":1652754572,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1167257580?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-05-17 10:29","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Opinion: A Smart Way to Play Tesla’s Big Stock-Market Swings Using Options","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1167257580","media":"MarketWatch","summary":"Take advantage of this pattern of implied volatility of Tesla put optionsAFP via Getty ImagesTesla h","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Take advantage of this pattern of implied volatility of Tesla put options</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4dd8dffa3cf63cb0bfdceb9885f4027f\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"484\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>AFP via Getty Images</span></p><p>Tesla has recently been one of the most active and volatile stocks. However, what appears to the naked eye is not always the same when placed under the microscope of analytical mathematics.</p><p>Let’s begin by looking at the stock’s one-year chart:</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b46d4e3160f8830fb77d787257d05e32\" tg-width=\"699\" tg-height=\"523\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>Lawrence McMillan</span></p><p>We can see that the stock was in a steady uptrend from May through October of 2021. Then, it experienced a strong rise into November. Since then, it has been volatile – swinging back and forth in wide ranges and generally moving lower. Note that the stock bottomed in the 550-570 area back in May 2021.</p><p>This action has increased both the realized volatility of Tesla stock and the price of its options. In reality, though, Tesla options are not very expensive on a historical basis. However, there is a pattern to the pricing of the Tesla options that presents itself as a highly viable strategy.</p><p><b>A look into Tesla volatility</b></p><p>Let’s begin with some analysis of the volatility of Tesla and its options. Currently, the stock’s 20-day realized (historical) volatility (HV) is 82%. I would not be too concerned with what 82% means statistically, but rather use it for comparison with other volatility measures. The 50-day HV is 70%, and the 100-day HV is 71%. So those are in the same general neighborhood.</p><p>This chart shows the 20-day HV overlaid on top of the chart of the stock.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0ef2fc8c1e05b180584420867e11c1e4\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"523\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>Lawrence McMillan</span></p><p>The 20-day HV (top graph) was declining when Tesla was rising, from May through October 2021. That is typical. Since then, however, with Tesla swinging in a wide range, the 20-day HV has increased, although it has roughly stayed in a range of 55% to 90% since last November.</p><p>These historical volatilities come into sharper focus when we look at the implied volatilities of Tesla options. On a volume-weighted calculation, the composite implied volatility (CIV) of TSLA options is 71.4%. Since the historical volatilities were 82%, 70%, and 71%, that shows the implied volatility of Tesla options is “about right.” They are not overly expensive but nor are they cheap when we consider how fast the underlying stock has been moving around.</p><p>There is one more piece of information that we need to have to build an option strategy: a comparison of today’s implied volatility (CIV) with past daily readings of CIV. That is shown in the next chart.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6d3bf3cf7cf70ca3d240bc6382e2d0cc\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"525\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>Lawrence McMillan</span></p><p>You can see that the current CIV (71.3%) is toward the upper end of the range of CIVs over the past year. Last September, Tesla options were trading with an implied volatility of 31% — that is the low point on the Implied Volatility chart. In fact, over the past 600 trading days, the current reading of 71.3% is in the 67th percentile. The percentile is merely an easy way to state how expensive the options are, on a scale of 0 to 100. So they are a little bit “overpriced” but not tremendously so.</p><p><b>Option strategies to consider</b></p><p><b>Call purchase:</b>So what option strategies make sense? If you are bullish on the stock, you are not really overpaying for an outright call purchase; the outright purchase of the at-the-money, June (17th) 770 call costs 70 points, or $7,000 for one contract. That is a large dollar amount for one call, but statistically is not a terribly high price, for its implied volatility is about 75% — generally in line with the volatilities that were discussed above.</p><p>One could counter that dollar expense a little by creating a call bull spread – perhaps selling the Jun (17th) 870 call against the call you are buying. That would bring in roughly $3,000 but would cap off your profit potential at 870.</p><p>As one can see from the accompanying stock charts, the stock could be above 870 very quickly if things turn bullish.</p><p>Personally, with the CIV in the 67th percentile, if I were outright bullish on the stock, I would not bother with a call bull spread because it caps off your profit potential. Call bull spreads only make statistical sense if the CIV is much higher – perhaps near the 90th percentile or higher.</p><p><b>Put purchase:</b> Essentially, the same argument applies if you are bearish on the stock: buy the at-the-money put and don’t spread. There is a small argument in favor of a bear spread (for example, buy the June 770 put and sell the Jun 670 put) over the call bull spread, which we’ll get to in a minute.</p><p><b>Put sale:</b> If one wouldn’t mind owning the stock at 550, the June (17th) 550 put could be sold for about 8 points. That is where the support was on the above stock charts, and is an implied volatility of 90% — meaning that you would be selling an expensive option (since 90% is higher than the other volatilities discussed above).</p><p>The problem with a put sale is that if the stock drops below 550, one might not be so willing to own the stock. But the put sale can always be closed out for a loss if Tesla is falling.</p><p><b>Neutral strategy:</b> A neutral strategy is generally one in which the strategist doesn’t necessarily hold a strong opinion about the forthcoming movements in the underlying stock, but rather can build an option strategy that makes money in a large number of outcomes. Neutral strategies have risk, though, and they cannot just be established willy-nilly without understanding the specifics of the strategy.</p><p>One strategy that seems to be viable here involves what is called a “skew” in the implied volatility of the options – particularly the put options. It is often the case with index options, and with stock options where the underlying stock is in a downtrend, that out-of-the-money puts are far more expensive than at-the-money puts.</p><p>Consider the following current information:</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/04070d2c608f982be2031e33d0f1a735\" tg-width=\"935\" tg-height=\"489\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>The pattern of implied volatility of Tesla put options is called a “negative” skew or “reverse” skew – meaning that out-of-the-money puts are expensive, when compared with at-the-money puts.</p><p>By the way, the pattern does not extend to the TSLA calls unless one is looking at extremely far out-of-the-money calls.</p><p>When there is a reverse skew, any option strategy that takes advantage of the skew buy puts with “higher” strikes (at-the-money, say), and sell puts with lower strikes. That is why it was noted above that a put bear spread might make some sense (even though it would cap off your downside profit potential, which you probably would not want if you were bearish on Tesla).</p><p>However, in this case, we are looking for a more neutral strategy. One of my favorite strategies in this case is to:</p><ol><li>Buy a high strike put</li><li>Sell a lower strike put</li><li>Sell an <i>even</i> lower strike put</li><li>Buy a deeply out-of-the-money to cap off risk</li></ol><p>Suppose we establish this strategy:</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6dd43eeb4e41f843bf8bb69e4ff3b226\" tg-width=\"933\" tg-height=\"387\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>Note that we are buying a lower volatility (80%) and selling two higher volatilities (82% and 88%) on the three higher strikes in the spread. The fourth leg is there mainly to limit risk and reduce the money needed to establish the spread.</p><p>If you want to attach a name to this strategy, it is often called a “broken-wing” butterfly spread.</p><p>If the stock is above 700 at expiration, you would profit by the amount of the initial credit ($600 in this case) because all of the puts would expire worthless in that case.</p><p>If the stock is between 570 and 680 at expiration, you make $2,600 on the spread.</p><p>But if the stock falls below 544 at expiration, you have risk down to the lowest strike, in this case 400. That would generally be too much risk to take (144 points), so in practice, one would stop out this spread if Tesla fell below the lowest short strike, 570. Recall that was the March 2021 low for the stock, so in theory there might be some support at that level. If it fails, then it would be time to abandon this spread.</p><p>This is one other interesting aspect to spreads that attempt to take advantage of the skew. The position can often be removed in advance of expiration for a reasonable credit (not the maximum credit, of course). This is due to the way that options decay when there is a skew. For example, if Tesla is between 680 and 700 in early June, one would likely be able to remove the spread for a credit of 5 to 10 points.</p><p>The following graph shows the profit and risk potential of this spread if held until expiration. As noted above, one should stop out the position if Tesla falls below 570, rather than risk it dropping to 400.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cf90dc892adef9c4bd9106677613be48\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"526\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>Lawrence McMillan</span></p><p>This type of spread can only be established in a margin account. Even though there is no margin debit, the requirements for spread trading in options necessitate what is called “collateral margin” to finance the spread. In essence, one must advance the risk of the spread when it is established. Option-oriented brokerage firms might reduce that requirement, but the ultimate risk is the 144 points between the two lower strikes, less the initial credit of 6 points, or $13,800.</p><p>Typically, an account with a larger portfolio of stocks might consider a spread such as this as an “overlay,” where the borrowing power of the stocks could be used to finance the spread without actually having to advance cash for the collateral requirement.</p><p><b>Summary</b></p><p>Tesla options are fairly priced. Thus any speculative strategy can be undertaken without fear of having overpaid for the options. Since the options are fairly priced, do not use vertical spreads (call bull spreads or put bear spreads are not optimal at this time). The presence of the reverse skew in the puts means that traders with a more theoretical or neutral bent can consider spreads where puts with higher strikes are bought and puts with lower strikes are sold. The “broken-wing” butterfly is just one example of that type of spread.</p><p>Finally, investors with a longer-term view might consider selling expensive, deeply out-of-the-money (expensive) Tesla puts, if they wouldn’t mind buying the stock at the strike price should the share price fall.</p></body></html>","source":"lsy1603348471595","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Opinion: A Smart Way to Play Tesla’s Big Stock-Market Swings Using Options</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nOpinion: A Smart Way to Play Tesla’s Big Stock-Market Swings Using Options\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-05-17 10:29 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.marketwatch.com/story/a-smart-way-to-play-teslas-big-stock-market-swings-using-options-11652714566?mod=home-page><strong>MarketWatch</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Take advantage of this pattern of implied volatility of Tesla put optionsAFP via Getty ImagesTesla has recently been one of the most active and volatile stocks. However, what appears to the naked eye ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/a-smart-way-to-play-teslas-big-stock-market-swings-using-options-11652714566?mod=home-page\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/a-smart-way-to-play-teslas-big-stock-market-swings-using-options-11652714566?mod=home-page","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1167257580","content_text":"Take advantage of this pattern of implied volatility of Tesla put optionsAFP via Getty ImagesTesla has recently been one of the most active and volatile stocks. However, what appears to the naked eye is not always the same when placed under the microscope of analytical mathematics.Let’s begin by looking at the stock’s one-year chart:Lawrence McMillanWe can see that the stock was in a steady uptrend from May through October of 2021. Then, it experienced a strong rise into November. Since then, it has been volatile – swinging back and forth in wide ranges and generally moving lower. Note that the stock bottomed in the 550-570 area back in May 2021.This action has increased both the realized volatility of Tesla stock and the price of its options. In reality, though, Tesla options are not very expensive on a historical basis. However, there is a pattern to the pricing of the Tesla options that presents itself as a highly viable strategy.A look into Tesla volatilityLet’s begin with some analysis of the volatility of Tesla and its options. Currently, the stock’s 20-day realized (historical) volatility (HV) is 82%. I would not be too concerned with what 82% means statistically, but rather use it for comparison with other volatility measures. The 50-day HV is 70%, and the 100-day HV is 71%. So those are in the same general neighborhood.This chart shows the 20-day HV overlaid on top of the chart of the stock.Lawrence McMillanThe 20-day HV (top graph) was declining when Tesla was rising, from May through October 2021. That is typical. Since then, however, with Tesla swinging in a wide range, the 20-day HV has increased, although it has roughly stayed in a range of 55% to 90% since last November.These historical volatilities come into sharper focus when we look at the implied volatilities of Tesla options. On a volume-weighted calculation, the composite implied volatility (CIV) of TSLA options is 71.4%. Since the historical volatilities were 82%, 70%, and 71%, that shows the implied volatility of Tesla options is “about right.” They are not overly expensive but nor are they cheap when we consider how fast the underlying stock has been moving around.There is one more piece of information that we need to have to build an option strategy: a comparison of today’s implied volatility (CIV) with past daily readings of CIV. That is shown in the next chart.Lawrence McMillanYou can see that the current CIV (71.3%) is toward the upper end of the range of CIVs over the past year. Last September, Tesla options were trading with an implied volatility of 31% — that is the low point on the Implied Volatility chart. In fact, over the past 600 trading days, the current reading of 71.3% is in the 67th percentile. The percentile is merely an easy way to state how expensive the options are, on a scale of 0 to 100. So they are a little bit “overpriced” but not tremendously so.Option strategies to considerCall purchase:So what option strategies make sense? If you are bullish on the stock, you are not really overpaying for an outright call purchase; the outright purchase of the at-the-money, June (17th) 770 call costs 70 points, or $7,000 for one contract. That is a large dollar amount for one call, but statistically is not a terribly high price, for its implied volatility is about 75% — generally in line with the volatilities that were discussed above.One could counter that dollar expense a little by creating a call bull spread – perhaps selling the Jun (17th) 870 call against the call you are buying. That would bring in roughly $3,000 but would cap off your profit potential at 870.As one can see from the accompanying stock charts, the stock could be above 870 very quickly if things turn bullish.Personally, with the CIV in the 67th percentile, if I were outright bullish on the stock, I would not bother with a call bull spread because it caps off your profit potential. Call bull spreads only make statistical sense if the CIV is much higher – perhaps near the 90th percentile or higher.Put purchase: Essentially, the same argument applies if you are bearish on the stock: buy the at-the-money put and don’t spread. There is a small argument in favor of a bear spread (for example, buy the June 770 put and sell the Jun 670 put) over the call bull spread, which we’ll get to in a minute.Put sale: If one wouldn’t mind owning the stock at 550, the June (17th) 550 put could be sold for about 8 points. That is where the support was on the above stock charts, and is an implied volatility of 90% — meaning that you would be selling an expensive option (since 90% is higher than the other volatilities discussed above).The problem with a put sale is that if the stock drops below 550, one might not be so willing to own the stock. But the put sale can always be closed out for a loss if Tesla is falling.Neutral strategy: A neutral strategy is generally one in which the strategist doesn’t necessarily hold a strong opinion about the forthcoming movements in the underlying stock, but rather can build an option strategy that makes money in a large number of outcomes. Neutral strategies have risk, though, and they cannot just be established willy-nilly without understanding the specifics of the strategy.One strategy that seems to be viable here involves what is called a “skew” in the implied volatility of the options – particularly the put options. It is often the case with index options, and with stock options where the underlying stock is in a downtrend, that out-of-the-money puts are far more expensive than at-the-money puts.Consider the following current information:The pattern of implied volatility of Tesla put options is called a “negative” skew or “reverse” skew – meaning that out-of-the-money puts are expensive, when compared with at-the-money puts.By the way, the pattern does not extend to the TSLA calls unless one is looking at extremely far out-of-the-money calls.When there is a reverse skew, any option strategy that takes advantage of the skew buy puts with “higher” strikes (at-the-money, say), and sell puts with lower strikes. That is why it was noted above that a put bear spread might make some sense (even though it would cap off your downside profit potential, which you probably would not want if you were bearish on Tesla).However, in this case, we are looking for a more neutral strategy. One of my favorite strategies in this case is to:Buy a high strike putSell a lower strike putSell an even lower strike putBuy a deeply out-of-the-money to cap off riskSuppose we establish this strategy:Note that we are buying a lower volatility (80%) and selling two higher volatilities (82% and 88%) on the three higher strikes in the spread. The fourth leg is there mainly to limit risk and reduce the money needed to establish the spread.If you want to attach a name to this strategy, it is often called a “broken-wing” butterfly spread.If the stock is above 700 at expiration, you would profit by the amount of the initial credit ($600 in this case) because all of the puts would expire worthless in that case.If the stock is between 570 and 680 at expiration, you make $2,600 on the spread.But if the stock falls below 544 at expiration, you have risk down to the lowest strike, in this case 400. That would generally be too much risk to take (144 points), so in practice, one would stop out this spread if Tesla fell below the lowest short strike, 570. Recall that was the March 2021 low for the stock, so in theory there might be some support at that level. If it fails, then it would be time to abandon this spread.This is one other interesting aspect to spreads that attempt to take advantage of the skew. The position can often be removed in advance of expiration for a reasonable credit (not the maximum credit, of course). This is due to the way that options decay when there is a skew. For example, if Tesla is between 680 and 700 in early June, one would likely be able to remove the spread for a credit of 5 to 10 points.The following graph shows the profit and risk potential of this spread if held until expiration. As noted above, one should stop out the position if Tesla falls below 570, rather than risk it dropping to 400.Lawrence McMillanThis type of spread can only be established in a margin account. Even though there is no margin debit, the requirements for spread trading in options necessitate what is called “collateral margin” to finance the spread. In essence, one must advance the risk of the spread when it is established. Option-oriented brokerage firms might reduce that requirement, but the ultimate risk is the 144 points between the two lower strikes, less the initial credit of 6 points, or $13,800.Typically, an account with a larger portfolio of stocks might consider a spread such as this as an “overlay,” where the borrowing power of the stocks could be used to finance the spread without actually having to advance cash for the collateral requirement.SummaryTesla options are fairly priced. Thus any speculative strategy can be undertaken without fear of having overpaid for the options. Since the options are fairly priced, do not use vertical spreads (call bull spreads or put bear spreads are not optimal at this time). The presence of the reverse skew in the puts means that traders with a more theoretical or neutral bent can consider spreads where puts with higher strikes are bought and puts with lower strikes are sold. The “broken-wing” butterfly is just one example of that type of spread.Finally, investors with a longer-term view might consider selling expensive, deeply out-of-the-money (expensive) Tesla puts, if they wouldn’t mind buying the stock at the strike price should the share price fall.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":10,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9060713048,"gmtCreate":1651193275038,"gmtModify":1676534867533,"author":{"id":"3569553993868964","authorId":"3569553993868964","authorIdStr":"3569553993868964","name":"leejk","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13d40c01a9eef0aa4dc0a703e255de7a","crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3569553993868964"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/SWBI\">$Smith And Wesson Brands Inc(SWBI)$</a>Thank","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/SWBI\">$Smith And Wesson Brands Inc(SWBI)$</a>Thank","text":"$Smith And Wesson Brands Inc(SWBI)$Thank","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/a55a584354c95d73a52d0801206ae26e","width":"1125","height":"3975"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9060713048","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":112,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9082725148,"gmtCreate":1650605765530,"gmtModify":1676534762839,"author":{"id":"3569553993868964","authorId":"3569553993868964","authorIdStr":"3569553993868964","name":"leejk","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13d40c01a9eef0aa4dc0a703e255de7a","crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3569553993868964"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/SOXQ\">$Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF(SOXQ)$</a>Omg","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/SOXQ\">$Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF(SOXQ)$</a>Omg","text":"$Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF(SOXQ)$Omg","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/78a2c39a84469fdafe4fc4068d2f5316","width":"1170","height":"2292"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9082725148","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":230,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9931673353,"gmtCreate":1662458293172,"gmtModify":1676537064549,"author":{"id":"3569553993868964","authorId":"3569553993868964","authorIdStr":"3569553993868964","name":"leejk","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13d40c01a9eef0aa4dc0a703e255de7a","crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3569553993868964"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/TSLA\">$Tesla Motors(TSLA)$</a>H","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/TSLA\">$Tesla Motors(TSLA)$</a>H","text":"$Tesla Motors(TSLA)$H","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/644876c84a79c553115edc54f8899666","width":"828","height":"1632"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9931673353","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":97,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9994413763,"gmtCreate":1661669396354,"gmtModify":1676536559049,"author":{"id":"3569553993868964","authorId":"3569553993868964","authorIdStr":"3569553993868964","name":"leejk","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13d40c01a9eef0aa4dc0a703e255de7a","crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3569553993868964"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/9CI.SI\">$CapitaLandInves(9CI.SI)$</a>J","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/9CI.SI\">$CapitaLandInves(9CI.SI)$</a>J","text":"$CapitaLandInves(9CI.SI)$J","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/73e501fe2f1d3145267ce19a8fea929b","width":"1170","height":"2292"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9994413763","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":56,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9993564499,"gmtCreate":1660702870413,"gmtModify":1676536383255,"author":{"id":"3569553993868964","authorId":"3569553993868964","authorIdStr":"3569553993868964","name":"leejk","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13d40c01a9eef0aa4dc0a703e255de7a","crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3569553993868964"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/AIY.SI\">$IFAST CORPORATION LTD.(AIY.SI)$</a>H","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/AIY.SI\">$IFAST CORPORATION LTD.(AIY.SI)$</a>H","text":"$IFAST CORPORATION LTD.(AIY.SI)$H","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/31a45792107e9e7004bb3cfc87998f6c","width":"1170","height":"2292"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9993564499","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":75,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9900425278,"gmtCreate":1658755611994,"gmtModify":1676536202277,"author":{"id":"3569553993868964","authorId":"3569553993868964","authorIdStr":"3569553993868964","name":"leejk","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13d40c01a9eef0aa4dc0a703e255de7a","crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3569553993868964"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/SOXQ\">$Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF(SOXQ)$</a>H","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/SOXQ\">$Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF(SOXQ)$</a>H","text":"$Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF(SOXQ)$H","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/2c46dde1570997816b5d86d3abda0e5d","width":"1170","height":"2292"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9900425278","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":172,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[{"author":{"id":"4113904591642392","authorId":"4113904591642392","authorIdStr":"4113904591642392","name":"LMSunshine","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/0ad636f2490d8428fcee9da6d669e46c","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"4113904591642392"},"content":"Hope this gets better soon! Thanks for leaving a comment in my post, appreciate it loads 🤗 Do check out other posts on my homepage & please help to like, many thanks 🤓","text":"Hope this gets better soon! Thanks for leaving a comment in my post, appreciate it loads 🤗 Do check out other posts on my homepage & please help to like, many thanks 🤓","html":"Hope this gets better soon! Thanks for leaving a comment in my post, appreciate it loads 🤗 Do check out other posts on my homepage & please help to like, many thanks 🤓"}],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}