CWei92 personal page - To The Moon

CWei92

CWei92

No personal profile

18Follow

2Followers

0Topic

0Badge

2021-05-10

like and comment

US government declares emergency after cyberattack on major pipeline

2021-05-11

like and comment

Wall Street closes lower as inflation fears prompt tech sell-off

2021-06-15

like and comment please

'Gonna Need More Stimmies' - US Retail Sales Plunged In May

2021-06-03

like and comment thanks

Is Apple Stock Overvalued?

2021-05-16

nice

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2021-05-06

like and comment

Dow ends at record high，Nasdaq falls as tech slides

2021-07-16

good

'Boring '20s'? - a decade of zero real rates :Mike Dolan

2021-05-18

like and comment thanks

JD.com to Report Q1 Earnings: What's in the Cards?

2021-05-16

like and comment

Why AMC Entertainment Stock Jumped Again Friday

2021-05-14

to the moon

Nio Grabbed 23% Share Of China's All-Electric SUV Market In April, Ahead Of Tesla's 17%

2021-05-10

please like and comment

Panasonic forecasts profit 28% profit jump on economic rebound

2021-07-16

good

'Boring '20s'? - a decade of zero real rates :Mike Dolan

2021-06-03

[Cool] [Cool] [Cool]

Is Apple Stock Overvalued?

2021-04-23

how is today marjet

Go to Tiger App to see more news

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"userPageInfo":{"id":"3570426503709368","uuid":"3570426503709368","gmtCreate":1618803842168,"gmtModify":1620283124925,"name":"CWei92","pinyin":"cwei92","introduction":"","introductionEn":null,"signature":"","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/63c5dff1b0ab726006ec156ccbcb83c2","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":2,"headSize":18,"tweetSize":14,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":1,"name":"萌萌虎","nameTw":"萌萌虎","represent":"呱呱坠地","factor":"评论帖子3次或发布1条主帖（非转发）","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":"success","userBadges":[{"badgeId":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493-2","templateUuid":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493","name":"Senior Tiger","description":"Join the tiger community for 1000 days","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0063fb68ea29c9ae6858c58630e182d5","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/96c699a93be4214d4b49aea6a5a5d1a4","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/35b0e542a9ff77046ed69ef602bc105d","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2024.01.16","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84-1","templateUuid":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84","name":"Real Trader","description":"Completed a transaction","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":2,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":null,"starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"hot","tweets":[{"id":170156401,"gmtCreate":1626414832903,"gmtModify":1703759717797,"author":{"id":"3570426503709368","authorId":"3570426503709368","name":"CWei92","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/63c5dff1b0ab726006ec156ccbcb83c2","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570426503709368","authorIdStr":"3570426503709368"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"good","listText":"good","text":"good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/170156401","repostId":"1124361019","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1124361019","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1626413039,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1124361019?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-16 13:23","market":"us","language":"en","title":"'Boring '20s'? - a decade of zero real rates :Mike Dolan","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1124361019","media":"Reuters","summary":"(The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters.)\nLONDON, July 16 (Reu","content":"<p>(The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters.)</p>\n<p>LONDON, July 16 (Reuters) - The U.S. government can once again borrow at a deeply negative ‘real’ rate of minus 1.0% for 10 years - and some economists insist there’s a powerful historical case for expecting that rate to stay near zero or below for the rest of the decade.</p>\n<p>It’s been fashionable in markets of late to think of another “Roaring ‘20s” emerging over the next decade. Pandemic-driven megatrends, fractious politics, gigantic government debt piles and the return of inflation could all conspire to electrify or unnerve markets over the years ahead - or so the story goes.</p>\n<p>But after a restive first quarter of 2021, global bond markets - still under the spell of heavy central bank buying - appear to be pricing in a very different scenario ahead.</p>\n<p>Even after this week’s June readout of the highest annual gain in U.S. core consumer prices in 30 years - an inflation rate of some 4.5% excluding food and energy prices - the yield on the Treasury’s 10-year inflation-protected bond skidded back below -1.0% for the first time in five months.</p>\n<p>Aside from that brief moment in February, these rates have never been lower - at least not in the history of these securities. And all equivalent rates in the G4 major economies are also below zero, with Germany and Britain even lower than those in the United States.</p>\n<p>Investors pore over everything from ‘peak inflation’ to ‘peak growth’ and even ‘peak stimulus’ for clues as to why bond yields continue to defy forecasts and why they have taken the surge in inflation and government debt levels in their stride.</p>\n<p>U.S. government debt will top 125% of gross domestic product this year and next - its highest since World War Two - and up almost 20 percentage points since before the pandemic. Debt/GDP in G4 economies overall has risen by a similar amount to 125%.</p>\n<p>While many put the seeming nonchalance down to persistent central bank intervention or technical quirks, some also point out to the risk of a weakening ‘fiscal impulse’ over the next two years that mathematically drags on growth rates.</p>\n<p>Manulife Investment Management economist Frances Donald thinks this should be seen as a “fiscal cliff” and the drop in U.S. spending - viewed as a share of resulting falling budget deficit - marks the steepest such cliff since the 1940s.</p>\n<p><b>HIGH PRESSURE</b></p>\n<p>However, G7 leaders pledged last month not to make the mistakes of the last crisis by reducing government spending too soon and reverting to fiscal austerity too early.</p>\n<p>The White House and congressional Democrats at least seem intent on keeping that “high pressure economy” until all sections of society take part. Leading Democrats this week agreed to table another $3.5 trillion investment plan on top of the proposed $600 billion of infrastructure spending already in the pipeline.</p>\n<p>And yet the bond market barely flickered at the prospect.</p>\n<p>Is this just the Federal Reserve’s hand? Is Fed buying really so dominant and can it remain so for years?</p>\n<p>Fed chief Jerome Powell was this week pointedly reluctant to give Congress any hard timeline for a reduction in bond buying and continued to characterize inflation spikes as mostly temporary base effects and bottlenecks from pandemic lockdowns.</p>\n<p>But if the Fed is right about inflation over time and the pursuit of a high pressure economy is now G7 consensus due to equality and climate priorities, history shows bond yields could be down here for a long time to come yet.</p>\n<p>Morgan Stanley economists published a study this week looking at 100 years of data on how countries managed debt blowouts - defined as periods when debt/GDP ratios jumped 20 percentage points in five years.</p>\n<p>They concluded that countries which managed to rein in those debt levels over the subsequent decade had kept looser monetary and fiscal policies longer than those who failed to stop their debt rising. Low debt servicing costs - absent an inflation problem - and growth were shown to be the best ways to keep debts sustainable.</p>\n<p>Studying all outcomes, they reckoned the most successful strategy was to keep real interest rates two percentage points below real GDP growth rates for 10 years and ‘grow out’ of the debt rather than slashing spending. Fiscal consolidation, by contrast, had played a lesser role in the reversal of public debt build-ups over the century, it said.</p>\n<p>On that basis the investment bank saw U.S. real rates held between -0.5% and +0.5% for the next decade - about 2 points below their expected real GDP growth rate.</p>\n<p>While flatlining, that’s still higher than today’s rate - although it assumes some modest Fed tightening at some point.</p>\n<p>And of course, the lower the growth rate, the lower the real rate needs to be to rein in debt loads. Morgan Stanley said that if adverse demographics and productivity depressed real GDP growth more than it thought then real rates as low as today’s may have to be sustained to stop debts rising.</p>\n<p>But it also said most episodes of successful debt reduction had generally been accompanied by only moderate but sustained inflation - a median of 2.9% for those successful in cutting debts. Contrary to popular perceptions, hyperinflation ensued only in a very small number of episodes.</p>\n<p>“Our analysis shows that the real rate environment has been key in determining the path of public debt substantially more so than actual fiscal spending.”</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>'Boring '20s'? - a decade of zero real rates :Mike Dolan</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n'Boring '20s'? - a decade of zero real rates :Mike Dolan\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-07-16 13:23</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>(The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters.)</p>\n<p>LONDON, July 16 (Reuters) - The U.S. government can once again borrow at a deeply negative ‘real’ rate of minus 1.0% for 10 years - and some economists insist there’s a powerful historical case for expecting that rate to stay near zero or below for the rest of the decade.</p>\n<p>It’s been fashionable in markets of late to think of another “Roaring ‘20s” emerging over the next decade. Pandemic-driven megatrends, fractious politics, gigantic government debt piles and the return of inflation could all conspire to electrify or unnerve markets over the years ahead - or so the story goes.</p>\n<p>But after a restive first quarter of 2021, global bond markets - still under the spell of heavy central bank buying - appear to be pricing in a very different scenario ahead.</p>\n<p>Even after this week’s June readout of the highest annual gain in U.S. core consumer prices in 30 years - an inflation rate of some 4.5% excluding food and energy prices - the yield on the Treasury’s 10-year inflation-protected bond skidded back below -1.0% for the first time in five months.</p>\n<p>Aside from that brief moment in February, these rates have never been lower - at least not in the history of these securities. And all equivalent rates in the G4 major economies are also below zero, with Germany and Britain even lower than those in the United States.</p>\n<p>Investors pore over everything from ‘peak inflation’ to ‘peak growth’ and even ‘peak stimulus’ for clues as to why bond yields continue to defy forecasts and why they have taken the surge in inflation and government debt levels in their stride.</p>\n<p>U.S. government debt will top 125% of gross domestic product this year and next - its highest since World War Two - and up almost 20 percentage points since before the pandemic. Debt/GDP in G4 economies overall has risen by a similar amount to 125%.</p>\n<p>While many put the seeming nonchalance down to persistent central bank intervention or technical quirks, some also point out to the risk of a weakening ‘fiscal impulse’ over the next two years that mathematically drags on growth rates.</p>\n<p>Manulife Investment Management economist Frances Donald thinks this should be seen as a “fiscal cliff” and the drop in U.S. spending - viewed as a share of resulting falling budget deficit - marks the steepest such cliff since the 1940s.</p>\n<p><b>HIGH PRESSURE</b></p>\n<p>However, G7 leaders pledged last month not to make the mistakes of the last crisis by reducing government spending too soon and reverting to fiscal austerity too early.</p>\n<p>The White House and congressional Democrats at least seem intent on keeping that “high pressure economy” until all sections of society take part. Leading Democrats this week agreed to table another $3.5 trillion investment plan on top of the proposed $600 billion of infrastructure spending already in the pipeline.</p>\n<p>And yet the bond market barely flickered at the prospect.</p>\n<p>Is this just the Federal Reserve’s hand? Is Fed buying really so dominant and can it remain so for years?</p>\n<p>Fed chief Jerome Powell was this week pointedly reluctant to give Congress any hard timeline for a reduction in bond buying and continued to characterize inflation spikes as mostly temporary base effects and bottlenecks from pandemic lockdowns.</p>\n<p>But if the Fed is right about inflation over time and the pursuit of a high pressure economy is now G7 consensus due to equality and climate priorities, history shows bond yields could be down here for a long time to come yet.</p>\n<p>Morgan Stanley economists published a study this week looking at 100 years of data on how countries managed debt blowouts - defined as periods when debt/GDP ratios jumped 20 percentage points in five years.</p>\n<p>They concluded that countries which managed to rein in those debt levels over the subsequent decade had kept looser monetary and fiscal policies longer than those who failed to stop their debt rising. Low debt servicing costs - absent an inflation problem - and growth were shown to be the best ways to keep debts sustainable.</p>\n<p>Studying all outcomes, they reckoned the most successful strategy was to keep real interest rates two percentage points below real GDP growth rates for 10 years and ‘grow out’ of the debt rather than slashing spending. Fiscal consolidation, by contrast, had played a lesser role in the reversal of public debt build-ups over the century, it said.</p>\n<p>On that basis the investment bank saw U.S. real rates held between -0.5% and +0.5% for the next decade - about 2 points below their expected real GDP growth rate.</p>\n<p>While flatlining, that’s still higher than today’s rate - although it assumes some modest Fed tightening at some point.</p>\n<p>And of course, the lower the growth rate, the lower the real rate needs to be to rein in debt loads. Morgan Stanley said that if adverse demographics and productivity depressed real GDP growth more than it thought then real rates as low as today’s may have to be sustained to stop debts rising.</p>\n<p>But it also said most episodes of successful debt reduction had generally been accompanied by only moderate but sustained inflation - a median of 2.9% for those successful in cutting debts. Contrary to popular perceptions, hyperinflation ensued only in a very small number of episodes.</p>\n<p>“Our analysis shows that the real rate environment has been key in determining the path of public debt substantially more so than actual fiscal spending.”</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SPY":"标普500ETF",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1124361019","content_text":"(The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters.)\nLONDON, July 16 (Reuters) - The U.S. government can once again borrow at a deeply negative ‘real’ rate of minus 1.0% for 10 years - and some economists insist there’s a powerful historical case for expecting that rate to stay near zero or below for the rest of the decade.\nIt’s been fashionable in markets of late to think of another “Roaring ‘20s” emerging over the next decade. Pandemic-driven megatrends, fractious politics, gigantic government debt piles and the return of inflation could all conspire to electrify or unnerve markets over the years ahead - or so the story goes.\nBut after a restive first quarter of 2021, global bond markets - still under the spell of heavy central bank buying - appear to be pricing in a very different scenario ahead.\nEven after this week’s June readout of the highest annual gain in U.S. core consumer prices in 30 years - an inflation rate of some 4.5% excluding food and energy prices - the yield on the Treasury’s 10-year inflation-protected bond skidded back below -1.0% for the first time in five months.\nAside from that brief moment in February, these rates have never been lower - at least not in the history of these securities. And all equivalent rates in the G4 major economies are also below zero, with Germany and Britain even lower than those in the United States.\nInvestors pore over everything from ‘peak inflation’ to ‘peak growth’ and even ‘peak stimulus’ for clues as to why bond yields continue to defy forecasts and why they have taken the surge in inflation and government debt levels in their stride.\nU.S. government debt will top 125% of gross domestic product this year and next - its highest since World War Two - and up almost 20 percentage points since before the pandemic. Debt/GDP in G4 economies overall has risen by a similar amount to 125%.\nWhile many put the seeming nonchalance down to persistent central bank intervention or technical quirks, some also point out to the risk of a weakening ‘fiscal impulse’ over the next two years that mathematically drags on growth rates.\nManulife Investment Management economist Frances Donald thinks this should be seen as a “fiscal cliff” and the drop in U.S. spending - viewed as a share of resulting falling budget deficit - marks the steepest such cliff since the 1940s.\nHIGH PRESSURE\nHowever, G7 leaders pledged last month not to make the mistakes of the last crisis by reducing government spending too soon and reverting to fiscal austerity too early.\nThe White House and congressional Democrats at least seem intent on keeping that “high pressure economy” until all sections of society take part. Leading Democrats this week agreed to table another $3.5 trillion investment plan on top of the proposed $600 billion of infrastructure spending already in the pipeline.\nAnd yet the bond market barely flickered at the prospect.\nIs this just the Federal Reserve’s hand? Is Fed buying really so dominant and can it remain so for years?\nFed chief Jerome Powell was this week pointedly reluctant to give Congress any hard timeline for a reduction in bond buying and continued to characterize inflation spikes as mostly temporary base effects and bottlenecks from pandemic lockdowns.\nBut if the Fed is right about inflation over time and the pursuit of a high pressure economy is now G7 consensus due to equality and climate priorities, history shows bond yields could be down here for a long time to come yet.\nMorgan Stanley economists published a study this week looking at 100 years of data on how countries managed debt blowouts - defined as periods when debt/GDP ratios jumped 20 percentage points in five years.\nThey concluded that countries which managed to rein in those debt levels over the subsequent decade had kept looser monetary and fiscal policies longer than those who failed to stop their debt rising. Low debt servicing costs - absent an inflation problem - and growth were shown to be the best ways to keep debts sustainable.\nStudying all outcomes, they reckoned the most successful strategy was to keep real interest rates two percentage points below real GDP growth rates for 10 years and ‘grow out’ of the debt rather than slashing spending. Fiscal consolidation, by contrast, had played a lesser role in the reversal of public debt build-ups over the century, it said.\nOn that basis the investment bank saw U.S. real rates held between -0.5% and +0.5% for the next decade - about 2 points below their expected real GDP growth rate.\nWhile flatlining, that’s still higher than today’s rate - although it assumes some modest Fed tightening at some point.\nAnd of course, the lower the growth rate, the lower the real rate needs to be to rein in debt loads. Morgan Stanley said that if adverse demographics and productivity depressed real GDP growth more than it thought then real rates as low as today’s may have to be sustained to stop debts rising.\nBut it also said most episodes of successful debt reduction had generally been accompanied by only moderate but sustained inflation - a median of 2.9% for those successful in cutting debts. Contrary to popular perceptions, hyperinflation ensued only in a very small number of episodes.\n“Our analysis shows that the real rate environment has been key in determining the path of public debt substantially more so than actual fiscal spending.”","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":222,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":170156102,"gmtCreate":1626414796006,"gmtModify":1703759716969,"author":{"id":"3570426503709368","authorId":"3570426503709368","name":"CWei92","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/63c5dff1b0ab726006ec156ccbcb83c2","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570426503709368","authorIdStr":"3570426503709368"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"good","listText":"good","text":"good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/170156102","repostId":"1124361019","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1124361019","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1626413039,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1124361019?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-16 13:23","market":"us","language":"en","title":"'Boring '20s'? - a decade of zero real rates :Mike Dolan","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1124361019","media":"Reuters","summary":"(The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters.)\nLONDON, July 16 (Reu","content":"<p>(The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters.)</p>\n<p>LONDON, July 16 (Reuters) - The U.S. government can once again borrow at a deeply negative ‘real’ rate of minus 1.0% for 10 years - and some economists insist there’s a powerful historical case for expecting that rate to stay near zero or below for the rest of the decade.</p>\n<p>It’s been fashionable in markets of late to think of another “Roaring ‘20s” emerging over the next decade. Pandemic-driven megatrends, fractious politics, gigantic government debt piles and the return of inflation could all conspire to electrify or unnerve markets over the years ahead - or so the story goes.</p>\n<p>But after a restive first quarter of 2021, global bond markets - still under the spell of heavy central bank buying - appear to be pricing in a very different scenario ahead.</p>\n<p>Even after this week’s June readout of the highest annual gain in U.S. core consumer prices in 30 years - an inflation rate of some 4.5% excluding food and energy prices - the yield on the Treasury’s 10-year inflation-protected bond skidded back below -1.0% for the first time in five months.</p>\n<p>Aside from that brief moment in February, these rates have never been lower - at least not in the history of these securities. And all equivalent rates in the G4 major economies are also below zero, with Germany and Britain even lower than those in the United States.</p>\n<p>Investors pore over everything from ‘peak inflation’ to ‘peak growth’ and even ‘peak stimulus’ for clues as to why bond yields continue to defy forecasts and why they have taken the surge in inflation and government debt levels in their stride.</p>\n<p>U.S. government debt will top 125% of gross domestic product this year and next - its highest since World War Two - and up almost 20 percentage points since before the pandemic. Debt/GDP in G4 economies overall has risen by a similar amount to 125%.</p>\n<p>While many put the seeming nonchalance down to persistent central bank intervention or technical quirks, some also point out to the risk of a weakening ‘fiscal impulse’ over the next two years that mathematically drags on growth rates.</p>\n<p>Manulife Investment Management economist Frances Donald thinks this should be seen as a “fiscal cliff” and the drop in U.S. spending - viewed as a share of resulting falling budget deficit - marks the steepest such cliff since the 1940s.</p>\n<p><b>HIGH PRESSURE</b></p>\n<p>However, G7 leaders pledged last month not to make the mistakes of the last crisis by reducing government spending too soon and reverting to fiscal austerity too early.</p>\n<p>The White House and congressional Democrats at least seem intent on keeping that “high pressure economy” until all sections of society take part. Leading Democrats this week agreed to table another $3.5 trillion investment plan on top of the proposed $600 billion of infrastructure spending already in the pipeline.</p>\n<p>And yet the bond market barely flickered at the prospect.</p>\n<p>Is this just the Federal Reserve’s hand? Is Fed buying really so dominant and can it remain so for years?</p>\n<p>Fed chief Jerome Powell was this week pointedly reluctant to give Congress any hard timeline for a reduction in bond buying and continued to characterize inflation spikes as mostly temporary base effects and bottlenecks from pandemic lockdowns.</p>\n<p>But if the Fed is right about inflation over time and the pursuit of a high pressure economy is now G7 consensus due to equality and climate priorities, history shows bond yields could be down here for a long time to come yet.</p>\n<p>Morgan Stanley economists published a study this week looking at 100 years of data on how countries managed debt blowouts - defined as periods when debt/GDP ratios jumped 20 percentage points in five years.</p>\n<p>They concluded that countries which managed to rein in those debt levels over the subsequent decade had kept looser monetary and fiscal policies longer than those who failed to stop their debt rising. Low debt servicing costs - absent an inflation problem - and growth were shown to be the best ways to keep debts sustainable.</p>\n<p>Studying all outcomes, they reckoned the most successful strategy was to keep real interest rates two percentage points below real GDP growth rates for 10 years and ‘grow out’ of the debt rather than slashing spending. Fiscal consolidation, by contrast, had played a lesser role in the reversal of public debt build-ups over the century, it said.</p>\n<p>On that basis the investment bank saw U.S. real rates held between -0.5% and +0.5% for the next decade - about 2 points below their expected real GDP growth rate.</p>\n<p>While flatlining, that’s still higher than today’s rate - although it assumes some modest Fed tightening at some point.</p>\n<p>And of course, the lower the growth rate, the lower the real rate needs to be to rein in debt loads. Morgan Stanley said that if adverse demographics and productivity depressed real GDP growth more than it thought then real rates as low as today’s may have to be sustained to stop debts rising.</p>\n<p>But it also said most episodes of successful debt reduction had generally been accompanied by only moderate but sustained inflation - a median of 2.9% for those successful in cutting debts. Contrary to popular perceptions, hyperinflation ensued only in a very small number of episodes.</p>\n<p>“Our analysis shows that the real rate environment has been key in determining the path of public debt substantially more so than actual fiscal spending.”</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>'Boring '20s'? - a decade of zero real rates :Mike Dolan</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n'Boring '20s'? - a decade of zero real rates :Mike Dolan\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-07-16 13:23</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>(The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters.)</p>\n<p>LONDON, July 16 (Reuters) - The U.S. government can once again borrow at a deeply negative ‘real’ rate of minus 1.0% for 10 years - and some economists insist there’s a powerful historical case for expecting that rate to stay near zero or below for the rest of the decade.</p>\n<p>It’s been fashionable in markets of late to think of another “Roaring ‘20s” emerging over the next decade. Pandemic-driven megatrends, fractious politics, gigantic government debt piles and the return of inflation could all conspire to electrify or unnerve markets over the years ahead - or so the story goes.</p>\n<p>But after a restive first quarter of 2021, global bond markets - still under the spell of heavy central bank buying - appear to be pricing in a very different scenario ahead.</p>\n<p>Even after this week’s June readout of the highest annual gain in U.S. core consumer prices in 30 years - an inflation rate of some 4.5% excluding food and energy prices - the yield on the Treasury’s 10-year inflation-protected bond skidded back below -1.0% for the first time in five months.</p>\n<p>Aside from that brief moment in February, these rates have never been lower - at least not in the history of these securities. And all equivalent rates in the G4 major economies are also below zero, with Germany and Britain even lower than those in the United States.</p>\n<p>Investors pore over everything from ‘peak inflation’ to ‘peak growth’ and even ‘peak stimulus’ for clues as to why bond yields continue to defy forecasts and why they have taken the surge in inflation and government debt levels in their stride.</p>\n<p>U.S. government debt will top 125% of gross domestic product this year and next - its highest since World War Two - and up almost 20 percentage points since before the pandemic. Debt/GDP in G4 economies overall has risen by a similar amount to 125%.</p>\n<p>While many put the seeming nonchalance down to persistent central bank intervention or technical quirks, some also point out to the risk of a weakening ‘fiscal impulse’ over the next two years that mathematically drags on growth rates.</p>\n<p>Manulife Investment Management economist Frances Donald thinks this should be seen as a “fiscal cliff” and the drop in U.S. spending - viewed as a share of resulting falling budget deficit - marks the steepest such cliff since the 1940s.</p>\n<p><b>HIGH PRESSURE</b></p>\n<p>However, G7 leaders pledged last month not to make the mistakes of the last crisis by reducing government spending too soon and reverting to fiscal austerity too early.</p>\n<p>The White House and congressional Democrats at least seem intent on keeping that “high pressure economy” until all sections of society take part. Leading Democrats this week agreed to table another $3.5 trillion investment plan on top of the proposed $600 billion of infrastructure spending already in the pipeline.</p>\n<p>And yet the bond market barely flickered at the prospect.</p>\n<p>Is this just the Federal Reserve’s hand? Is Fed buying really so dominant and can it remain so for years?</p>\n<p>Fed chief Jerome Powell was this week pointedly reluctant to give Congress any hard timeline for a reduction in bond buying and continued to characterize inflation spikes as mostly temporary base effects and bottlenecks from pandemic lockdowns.</p>\n<p>But if the Fed is right about inflation over time and the pursuit of a high pressure economy is now G7 consensus due to equality and climate priorities, history shows bond yields could be down here for a long time to come yet.</p>\n<p>Morgan Stanley economists published a study this week looking at 100 years of data on how countries managed debt blowouts - defined as periods when debt/GDP ratios jumped 20 percentage points in five years.</p>\n<p>They concluded that countries which managed to rein in those debt levels over the subsequent decade had kept looser monetary and fiscal policies longer than those who failed to stop their debt rising. Low debt servicing costs - absent an inflation problem - and growth were shown to be the best ways to keep debts sustainable.</p>\n<p>Studying all outcomes, they reckoned the most successful strategy was to keep real interest rates two percentage points below real GDP growth rates for 10 years and ‘grow out’ of the debt rather than slashing spending. Fiscal consolidation, by contrast, had played a lesser role in the reversal of public debt build-ups over the century, it said.</p>\n<p>On that basis the investment bank saw U.S. real rates held between -0.5% and +0.5% for the next decade - about 2 points below their expected real GDP growth rate.</p>\n<p>While flatlining, that’s still higher than today’s rate - although it assumes some modest Fed tightening at some point.</p>\n<p>And of course, the lower the growth rate, the lower the real rate needs to be to rein in debt loads. Morgan Stanley said that if adverse demographics and productivity depressed real GDP growth more than it thought then real rates as low as today’s may have to be sustained to stop debts rising.</p>\n<p>But it also said most episodes of successful debt reduction had generally been accompanied by only moderate but sustained inflation - a median of 2.9% for those successful in cutting debts. Contrary to popular perceptions, hyperinflation ensued only in a very small number of episodes.</p>\n<p>“Our analysis shows that the real rate environment has been key in determining the path of public debt substantially more so than actual fiscal spending.”</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SPY":"标普500ETF",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1124361019","content_text":"(The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters.)\nLONDON, July 16 (Reuters) - The U.S. government can once again borrow at a deeply negative ‘real’ rate of minus 1.0% for 10 years - and some economists insist there’s a powerful historical case for expecting that rate to stay near zero or below for the rest of the decade.\nIt’s been fashionable in markets of late to think of another “Roaring ‘20s” emerging over the next decade. Pandemic-driven megatrends, fractious politics, gigantic government debt piles and the return of inflation could all conspire to electrify or unnerve markets over the years ahead - or so the story goes.\nBut after a restive first quarter of 2021, global bond markets - still under the spell of heavy central bank buying - appear to be pricing in a very different scenario ahead.\nEven after this week’s June readout of the highest annual gain in U.S. core consumer prices in 30 years - an inflation rate of some 4.5% excluding food and energy prices - the yield on the Treasury’s 10-year inflation-protected bond skidded back below -1.0% for the first time in five months.\nAside from that brief moment in February, these rates have never been lower - at least not in the history of these securities. And all equivalent rates in the G4 major economies are also below zero, with Germany and Britain even lower than those in the United States.\nInvestors pore over everything from ‘peak inflation’ to ‘peak growth’ and even ‘peak stimulus’ for clues as to why bond yields continue to defy forecasts and why they have taken the surge in inflation and government debt levels in their stride.\nU.S. government debt will top 125% of gross domestic product this year and next - its highest since World War Two - and up almost 20 percentage points since before the pandemic. Debt/GDP in G4 economies overall has risen by a similar amount to 125%.\nWhile many put the seeming nonchalance down to persistent central bank intervention or technical quirks, some also point out to the risk of a weakening ‘fiscal impulse’ over the next two years that mathematically drags on growth rates.\nManulife Investment Management economist Frances Donald thinks this should be seen as a “fiscal cliff” and the drop in U.S. spending - viewed as a share of resulting falling budget deficit - marks the steepest such cliff since the 1940s.\nHIGH PRESSURE\nHowever, G7 leaders pledged last month not to make the mistakes of the last crisis by reducing government spending too soon and reverting to fiscal austerity too early.\nThe White House and congressional Democrats at least seem intent on keeping that “high pressure economy” until all sections of society take part. Leading Democrats this week agreed to table another $3.5 trillion investment plan on top of the proposed $600 billion of infrastructure spending already in the pipeline.\nAnd yet the bond market barely flickered at the prospect.\nIs this just the Federal Reserve’s hand? Is Fed buying really so dominant and can it remain so for years?\nFed chief Jerome Powell was this week pointedly reluctant to give Congress any hard timeline for a reduction in bond buying and continued to characterize inflation spikes as mostly temporary base effects and bottlenecks from pandemic lockdowns.\nBut if the Fed is right about inflation over time and the pursuit of a high pressure economy is now G7 consensus due to equality and climate priorities, history shows bond yields could be down here for a long time to come yet.\nMorgan Stanley economists published a study this week looking at 100 years of data on how countries managed debt blowouts - defined as periods when debt/GDP ratios jumped 20 percentage points in five years.\nThey concluded that countries which managed to rein in those debt levels over the subsequent decade had kept looser monetary and fiscal policies longer than those who failed to stop their debt rising. Low debt servicing costs - absent an inflation problem - and growth were shown to be the best ways to keep debts sustainable.\nStudying all outcomes, they reckoned the most successful strategy was to keep real interest rates two percentage points below real GDP growth rates for 10 years and ‘grow out’ of the debt rather than slashing spending. Fiscal consolidation, by contrast, had played a lesser role in the reversal of public debt build-ups over the century, it said.\nOn that basis the investment bank saw U.S. real rates held between -0.5% and +0.5% for the next decade - about 2 points below their expected real GDP growth rate.\nWhile flatlining, that’s still higher than today’s rate - although it assumes some modest Fed tightening at some point.\nAnd of course, the lower the growth rate, the lower the real rate needs to be to rein in debt loads. Morgan Stanley said that if adverse demographics and productivity depressed real GDP growth more than it thought then real rates as low as today’s may have to be sustained to stop debts rising.\nBut it also said most episodes of successful debt reduction had generally been accompanied by only moderate but sustained inflation - a median of 2.9% for those successful in cutting debts. Contrary to popular perceptions, hyperinflation ensued only in a very small number of episodes.\n“Our analysis shows that the real rate environment has been key in determining the path of public debt substantially more so than actual fiscal spending.”","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":223,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":160081511,"gmtCreate":1623766576333,"gmtModify":1703818759919,"author":{"id":"3570426503709368","authorId":"3570426503709368","name":"CWei92","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/63c5dff1b0ab726006ec156ccbcb83c2","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570426503709368","authorIdStr":"3570426503709368"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"like and comment please","listText":"like and comment please","text":"like and comment please","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/160081511","repostId":"1175229651","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1175229651","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1623761854,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1175229651?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-15 20:57","market":"us","language":"en","title":"'Gonna Need More Stimmies' - US Retail Sales Plunged In May","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1175229651","media":"zerohedge","summary":"With a lack of stimmies to keep the spending dream alive, analysts expected a 0.8% MoM plunge in ret","content":"<p>With a lack of stimmies to keep the spending dream alive, analysts expected a 0.8% MoM plunge in retail sales (<i>confirming BofA's recent perfect streak of predictions</i>), but the data was even worse, tumbling 1.3% MoM...</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/45b8615441c602f54053c2e255ce180a\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"274\"><i>Source: Bloomberg</i></p>\n<p>Given the expected impact of autos from the chip shortage,<b>a \"cleaner\" number of the Ex-Autos print which was also a disaster,</b>tumbling 0.7% MoM (much worse than the 0.4% improvement expected)</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/29613437d5cc305349ea8b7f9b50ab0f\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"272\"><i>Source: Bloomberg</i></p>\n<p>BofA's forecasts nailed it again:</p>\n<ul>\n <li>BofA said retail headline -1.4%, came in at -1.4%</li>\n <li>BofA said retail ex auto -0.6%, came in at -0.7%</li>\n</ul>\n<p>Building Materials saw the biggest drop, along with Motor Vehicles (as noted above). Nonstore retailers (online) also saw a decline in sales...</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6d94f95a16decd0cf5893fd4408feb6c\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"435\">As the base effect wears off so the insane YoY comps ease back too...</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/049936d252903cc97f3b4cd8abec9044\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"273\"><i>Source: Bloomberg</i></p>\n<p>Finally, we note that retail inventories (supply) has reached a record low relative to retail sales (demand)...</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/70b0549aa7160c7d4b2b96a17a25d15d\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"271\"><i>Source: Bloomberg</i></p>\n<p>How will The Fed interpret this? Transitory supply distress?</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>'Gonna Need More Stimmies' - US Retail Sales Plunged In May</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n'Gonna Need More Stimmies' - US Retail Sales Plunged In May\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-06-15 20:57 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.zerohedge.com/personal-finance/gonna-need-more-stimmies-us-retail-sales-plunged-may><strong>zerohedge</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>With a lack of stimmies to keep the spending dream alive, analysts expected a 0.8% MoM plunge in retail sales (confirming BofA's recent perfect streak of predictions), but the data was even worse, ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/personal-finance/gonna-need-more-stimmies-us-retail-sales-plunged-may\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SPY":"标普500ETF",".DJI":"道琼斯",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/personal-finance/gonna-need-more-stimmies-us-retail-sales-plunged-may","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1175229651","content_text":"With a lack of stimmies to keep the spending dream alive, analysts expected a 0.8% MoM plunge in retail sales (confirming BofA's recent perfect streak of predictions), but the data was even worse, tumbling 1.3% MoM...\nSource: Bloomberg\nGiven the expected impact of autos from the chip shortage,a \"cleaner\" number of the Ex-Autos print which was also a disaster,tumbling 0.7% MoM (much worse than the 0.4% improvement expected)\nSource: Bloomberg\nBofA's forecasts nailed it again:\n\nBofA said retail headline -1.4%, came in at -1.4%\nBofA said retail ex auto -0.6%, came in at -0.7%\n\nBuilding Materials saw the biggest drop, along with Motor Vehicles (as noted above). Nonstore retailers (online) also saw a decline in sales...\nAs the base effect wears off so the insane YoY comps ease back too...\nSource: Bloomberg\nFinally, we note that retail inventories (supply) has reached a record low relative to retail sales (demand)...\nSource: Bloomberg\nHow will The Fed interpret this? Transitory supply distress?","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":559,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":118014827,"gmtCreate":1622707755970,"gmtModify":1704189333630,"author":{"id":"3570426503709368","authorId":"3570426503709368","name":"CWei92","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/63c5dff1b0ab726006ec156ccbcb83c2","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570426503709368","authorIdStr":"3570426503709368"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"like and comment thanks","listText":"like and comment thanks","text":"like and comment thanks","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/118014827","repostId":"1160407593","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1160407593","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1622706069,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1160407593?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-03 15:41","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Is Apple Stock Overvalued?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1160407593","media":"seekingalpha","summary":"Despite crushing Q2 earnings estimates, Apple shares have gone in reverse and are underperforming the broader market.I believe Wall Street expectations for Apple's FY2022 are unreasonably high and likely contributing to the recent weakness.Apple's Price/Earnings, Price/Sales, and Price/Free Cash flow still remain significantly elevated to historical levels.I have serious doubt that iPhone, iPad, and Mac sales can continue the current hot sales pace over the next year.Apple  bulls have to be frus","content":"<p><b>Summary</b></p>\n<ul>\n <li>Despite crushing Q2 earnings estimates, Apple shares have gone in reverse and are underperforming the broader market.</li>\n <li>I believe Wall Street expectations for Apple's FY2022 are unreasonably high and likely contributing to the recent weakness.</li>\n <li>Apple's Price/Earnings, Price/Sales, and Price/Free Cash flow still remain&nbsp;significantly elevated&nbsp;to historical levels.</li>\n <li>I have serious doubt that iPhone, iPad, and Mac sales can continue the current hot sales pace over the next year.</li>\n</ul>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bff81a333ee2ce5596e83df474ea7f56\" tg-width=\"768\" tg-height=\"511\"><span>Photo by PeskyMonkey/iStock Editorial via Getty Images</span></p>\n<p>Apple (AAPL) bulls have to be frustrated. Despite massive earnings beats in both its&nbsp;Q1 holiday quarter&nbsp;and&nbsp;Q2 January-March quarter, the shares have gone no where. The&nbsp;thesis from my last article&nbsp;on Apple, that COVID-19 lockdowns, government handouts, and the launch of 5G all culminated to pull demand into Apple's FY21 year,gained a supporter from analysts at New Street, who are now predicting the same.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1e41696d20058f8ca97f59715bca52b8\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"405\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>New Street isn't predicting that the sky is falling, and neither am I. They are just modeling<i>iPhone shipments in the 180M-200M range versus the 234M consensus.</i>Does this sound like an extreme view? I don't think it is, especially since SA Contributor Paulo Santos has been&nbsp;tracking iPhone sales in China&nbsp;and has seen a significant slowdown from the white-hot start to the beginning of this year. I think similar slowdowns for iPad and Mac are a few quarters away.</p>\n<p><b>What is AAPL's current valuation? Does it make sense?</b></p>\n<p>From the comments I've received on my last two articles, bulls must think I hate Apple and have an axe to grind. This could not be further from the truth. I've owned Apple outright many times in the past, and still own a significant stake in it through my Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.B) holdings. So I'm not rooting against it by any stretch, I'm just calling it like I see it - and I see the valuation as very stretched.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/242125db79bcaf3f8697bf4466c3f0c8\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"464\"><span>Data by YCharts</span></p>\n<p>Apple's Price/Earnings, Price/Sales, and Price/Free Cash flow still remain&nbsp;<b>significantly elevated</b>- 50% or more - from their historic norms.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2397347f029ba2ba682fa1398109d5e7\" tg-width=\"584\" tg-height=\"160\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>This is a key issue because the forward revenue growth and earnings estimates for Apple are already low and predict minimal growth. At these rates, nearly all of the earnings growth would come from the share repurchases.</p>\n<p>But these forward estimates assume Apple will repeat the record year they are having again in FY2022. I think the odds of that happening are slim. Instead, I expect a similar situation of what happened between FY2014-FY2016, where operating earnings increased significantly from FY2014 to FY2015, then declined moderately in FY2016.</p>\n<p><b>Apple's FY21 could be peak sales and earnings for a long time</b></p>\n<p>Since 2016, Apple has introduced a lot of successful new products: the Apple Watch, AirPods, and Apple TV, to go along with many new versions of Mac, iPhone, and iPad, along with impressive growth in Services.</p>\n<p>Yet with all of that success, Apple's Operating Income peaked in 2015 until shattering the prior peak over the last 12 months. From 2015-2020, Apple was able to grow EPS roughly 7%, with significant help from share repurchases and the TCJA corporate income tax cut. (Without this tax cut, 2020 EPS would have been ~$2.88 rather than $3.28, implying an EPS growth rate of around 4.5%.)</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3a878730fc1ed62d2dc0166d9aa16c21\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"279\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>Ultimately, I believe Apple's recent torrid sales performance will not be repeated and should not be considered a new run rate like Wall Street analysts are modeling. I look at iPad sales as an illustration of this. For the last several years, volumes had been steady until exploding 57% last year and continuing the same strength early this year.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/11c5c505d2f2c147fc7ee546576a5945\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"582\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>Did iPads suddenly become so much more popular? Or were there just a lot of parents working from home that wanted iPads for their kids? I'm going with the latter.</p>\n<p><b>Conclusion - Apple is still a Sell</b></p>\n<p>Wall St. analysts wasted no time increasing earnings expectations for next year based on what I believe is mostly an extrapolation of the current results.</p>\n<p>Admittedly, I'm less bullish on the 5G Supercycle than most. I believe that the innovators and early adopters will rush to upgrade, but most of the mass market will remain on the normal upgrade cadence, which continues to lengthen. I think the iPhone is a victim of its own success - that the recent iPhones are all so good, upgrading to newer phones is less compelling, and because 4G is \"good enough\" for most people.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3a5047edb2490f12fb4259f905c7fbac\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"305\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>Apple earned $2.97 in 2019. They've already earned $3.08 in the first two quarters of this year and current estimates are $5.16 for the full fiscal. Even with the growth in Services, I just do not see them repeating this performance next fiscal year, and expect earnings closer to the $4-4.50/share range, far short of the $5.30 that's currently expected. That would put Price/Earnings back above 30 with a negative growth rate. If this happens, shares could retest the $100 level.</p>\n<p>Apple is still a sell here for me. It's a great company that's simply priced too richly. Valuation always matters.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Is Apple Stock Overvalued?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nIs Apple Stock Overvalued?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-06-03 15:41 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4432646-apple-stock-overvalued><strong>seekingalpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Summary\n\nDespite crushing Q2 earnings estimates, Apple shares have gone in reverse and are underperforming the broader market.\nI believe Wall Street expectations for Apple's FY2022 are unreasonably ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4432646-apple-stock-overvalued\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4432646-apple-stock-overvalued","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1160407593","content_text":"Summary\n\nDespite crushing Q2 earnings estimates, Apple shares have gone in reverse and are underperforming the broader market.\nI believe Wall Street expectations for Apple's FY2022 are unreasonably high and likely contributing to the recent weakness.\nApple's Price/Earnings, Price/Sales, and Price/Free Cash flow still remain significantly elevated to historical levels.\nI have serious doubt that iPhone, iPad, and Mac sales can continue the current hot sales pace over the next year.\n\nPhoto by PeskyMonkey/iStock Editorial via Getty Images\nApple (AAPL) bulls have to be frustrated. Despite massive earnings beats in both its Q1 holiday quarter and Q2 January-March quarter, the shares have gone no where. The thesis from my last article on Apple, that COVID-19 lockdowns, government handouts, and the launch of 5G all culminated to pull demand into Apple's FY21 year,gained a supporter from analysts at New Street, who are now predicting the same.\n\nNew Street isn't predicting that the sky is falling, and neither am I. They are just modelingiPhone shipments in the 180M-200M range versus the 234M consensus.Does this sound like an extreme view? I don't think it is, especially since SA Contributor Paulo Santos has been tracking iPhone sales in China and has seen a significant slowdown from the white-hot start to the beginning of this year. I think similar slowdowns for iPad and Mac are a few quarters away.\nWhat is AAPL's current valuation? Does it make sense?\nFrom the comments I've received on my last two articles, bulls must think I hate Apple and have an axe to grind. This could not be further from the truth. I've owned Apple outright many times in the past, and still own a significant stake in it through my Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.B) holdings. So I'm not rooting against it by any stretch, I'm just calling it like I see it - and I see the valuation as very stretched.\nData by YCharts\nApple's Price/Earnings, Price/Sales, and Price/Free Cash flow still remain significantly elevated- 50% or more - from their historic norms.\n\nThis is a key issue because the forward revenue growth and earnings estimates for Apple are already low and predict minimal growth. At these rates, nearly all of the earnings growth would come from the share repurchases.\nBut these forward estimates assume Apple will repeat the record year they are having again in FY2022. I think the odds of that happening are slim. Instead, I expect a similar situation of what happened between FY2014-FY2016, where operating earnings increased significantly from FY2014 to FY2015, then declined moderately in FY2016.\nApple's FY21 could be peak sales and earnings for a long time\nSince 2016, Apple has introduced a lot of successful new products: the Apple Watch, AirPods, and Apple TV, to go along with many new versions of Mac, iPhone, and iPad, along with impressive growth in Services.\nYet with all of that success, Apple's Operating Income peaked in 2015 until shattering the prior peak over the last 12 months. From 2015-2020, Apple was able to grow EPS roughly 7%, with significant help from share repurchases and the TCJA corporate income tax cut. (Without this tax cut, 2020 EPS would have been ~$2.88 rather than $3.28, implying an EPS growth rate of around 4.5%.)\n\nUltimately, I believe Apple's recent torrid sales performance will not be repeated and should not be considered a new run rate like Wall Street analysts are modeling. I look at iPad sales as an illustration of this. For the last several years, volumes had been steady until exploding 57% last year and continuing the same strength early this year.\n\nDid iPads suddenly become so much more popular? Or were there just a lot of parents working from home that wanted iPads for their kids? I'm going with the latter.\nConclusion - Apple is still a Sell\nWall St. analysts wasted no time increasing earnings expectations for next year based on what I believe is mostly an extrapolation of the current results.\nAdmittedly, I'm less bullish on the 5G Supercycle than most. I believe that the innovators and early adopters will rush to upgrade, but most of the mass market will remain on the normal upgrade cadence, which continues to lengthen. I think the iPhone is a victim of its own success - that the recent iPhones are all so good, upgrading to newer phones is less compelling, and because 4G is \"good enough\" for most people.\n\nApple earned $2.97 in 2019. They've already earned $3.08 in the first two quarters of this year and current estimates are $5.16 for the full fiscal. Even with the growth in Services, I just do not see them repeating this performance next fiscal year, and expect earnings closer to the $4-4.50/share range, far short of the $5.30 that's currently expected. That would put Price/Earnings back above 30 with a negative growth rate. If this happens, shares could retest the $100 level.\nApple is still a sell here for me. It's a great company that's simply priced too richly. Valuation always matters.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":544,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":118015190,"gmtCreate":1622707726410,"gmtModify":1704189332018,"author":{"id":"3570426503709368","authorId":"3570426503709368","name":"CWei92","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/63c5dff1b0ab726006ec156ccbcb83c2","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570426503709368","authorIdStr":"3570426503709368"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[Cool]&nbsp;[Cool]&nbsp;[Cool]&nbsp;","listText":"[Cool]&nbsp;[Cool]&nbsp;[Cool]&nbsp;","text":"[Cool] [Cool] [Cool]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/118015190","repostId":"1160407593","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1160407593","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1622706069,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1160407593?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-03 15:41","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Is Apple Stock Overvalued?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1160407593","media":"seekingalpha","summary":"Despite crushing Q2 earnings estimates, Apple shares have gone in reverse and are underperforming the broader market.I believe Wall Street expectations for Apple's FY2022 are unreasonably high and likely contributing to the recent weakness.Apple's Price/Earnings, Price/Sales, and Price/Free Cash flow still remain significantly elevated to historical levels.I have serious doubt that iPhone, iPad, and Mac sales can continue the current hot sales pace over the next year.Apple  bulls have to be frus","content":"<p><b>Summary</b></p>\n<ul>\n <li>Despite crushing Q2 earnings estimates, Apple shares have gone in reverse and are underperforming the broader market.</li>\n <li>I believe Wall Street expectations for Apple's FY2022 are unreasonably high and likely contributing to the recent weakness.</li>\n <li>Apple's Price/Earnings, Price/Sales, and Price/Free Cash flow still remain&nbsp;significantly elevated&nbsp;to historical levels.</li>\n <li>I have serious doubt that iPhone, iPad, and Mac sales can continue the current hot sales pace over the next year.</li>\n</ul>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bff81a333ee2ce5596e83df474ea7f56\" tg-width=\"768\" tg-height=\"511\"><span>Photo by PeskyMonkey/iStock Editorial via Getty Images</span></p>\n<p>Apple (AAPL) bulls have to be frustrated. Despite massive earnings beats in both its&nbsp;Q1 holiday quarter&nbsp;and&nbsp;Q2 January-March quarter, the shares have gone no where. The&nbsp;thesis from my last article&nbsp;on Apple, that COVID-19 lockdowns, government handouts, and the launch of 5G all culminated to pull demand into Apple's FY21 year,gained a supporter from analysts at New Street, who are now predicting the same.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1e41696d20058f8ca97f59715bca52b8\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"405\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>New Street isn't predicting that the sky is falling, and neither am I. They are just modeling<i>iPhone shipments in the 180M-200M range versus the 234M consensus.</i>Does this sound like an extreme view? I don't think it is, especially since SA Contributor Paulo Santos has been&nbsp;tracking iPhone sales in China&nbsp;and has seen a significant slowdown from the white-hot start to the beginning of this year. I think similar slowdowns for iPad and Mac are a few quarters away.</p>\n<p><b>What is AAPL's current valuation? Does it make sense?</b></p>\n<p>From the comments I've received on my last two articles, bulls must think I hate Apple and have an axe to grind. This could not be further from the truth. I've owned Apple outright many times in the past, and still own a significant stake in it through my Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.B) holdings. So I'm not rooting against it by any stretch, I'm just calling it like I see it - and I see the valuation as very stretched.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/242125db79bcaf3f8697bf4466c3f0c8\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"464\"><span>Data by YCharts</span></p>\n<p>Apple's Price/Earnings, Price/Sales, and Price/Free Cash flow still remain&nbsp;<b>significantly elevated</b>- 50% or more - from their historic norms.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2397347f029ba2ba682fa1398109d5e7\" tg-width=\"584\" tg-height=\"160\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>This is a key issue because the forward revenue growth and earnings estimates for Apple are already low and predict minimal growth. At these rates, nearly all of the earnings growth would come from the share repurchases.</p>\n<p>But these forward estimates assume Apple will repeat the record year they are having again in FY2022. I think the odds of that happening are slim. Instead, I expect a similar situation of what happened between FY2014-FY2016, where operating earnings increased significantly from FY2014 to FY2015, then declined moderately in FY2016.</p>\n<p><b>Apple's FY21 could be peak sales and earnings for a long time</b></p>\n<p>Since 2016, Apple has introduced a lot of successful new products: the Apple Watch, AirPods, and Apple TV, to go along with many new versions of Mac, iPhone, and iPad, along with impressive growth in Services.</p>\n<p>Yet with all of that success, Apple's Operating Income peaked in 2015 until shattering the prior peak over the last 12 months. From 2015-2020, Apple was able to grow EPS roughly 7%, with significant help from share repurchases and the TCJA corporate income tax cut. (Without this tax cut, 2020 EPS would have been ~$2.88 rather than $3.28, implying an EPS growth rate of around 4.5%.)</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3a878730fc1ed62d2dc0166d9aa16c21\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"279\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>Ultimately, I believe Apple's recent torrid sales performance will not be repeated and should not be considered a new run rate like Wall Street analysts are modeling. I look at iPad sales as an illustration of this. For the last several years, volumes had been steady until exploding 57% last year and continuing the same strength early this year.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/11c5c505d2f2c147fc7ee546576a5945\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"582\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>Did iPads suddenly become so much more popular? Or were there just a lot of parents working from home that wanted iPads for their kids? I'm going with the latter.</p>\n<p><b>Conclusion - Apple is still a Sell</b></p>\n<p>Wall St. analysts wasted no time increasing earnings expectations for next year based on what I believe is mostly an extrapolation of the current results.</p>\n<p>Admittedly, I'm less bullish on the 5G Supercycle than most. I believe that the innovators and early adopters will rush to upgrade, but most of the mass market will remain on the normal upgrade cadence, which continues to lengthen. I think the iPhone is a victim of its own success - that the recent iPhones are all so good, upgrading to newer phones is less compelling, and because 4G is \"good enough\" for most people.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3a5047edb2490f12fb4259f905c7fbac\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"305\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>Apple earned $2.97 in 2019. They've already earned $3.08 in the first two quarters of this year and current estimates are $5.16 for the full fiscal. Even with the growth in Services, I just do not see them repeating this performance next fiscal year, and expect earnings closer to the $4-4.50/share range, far short of the $5.30 that's currently expected. That would put Price/Earnings back above 30 with a negative growth rate. If this happens, shares could retest the $100 level.</p>\n<p>Apple is still a sell here for me. It's a great company that's simply priced too richly. Valuation always matters.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Is Apple Stock Overvalued?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nIs Apple Stock Overvalued?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-06-03 15:41 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4432646-apple-stock-overvalued><strong>seekingalpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Summary\n\nDespite crushing Q2 earnings estimates, Apple shares have gone in reverse and are underperforming the broader market.\nI believe Wall Street expectations for Apple's FY2022 are unreasonably ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4432646-apple-stock-overvalued\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4432646-apple-stock-overvalued","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1160407593","content_text":"Summary\n\nDespite crushing Q2 earnings estimates, Apple shares have gone in reverse and are underperforming the broader market.\nI believe Wall Street expectations for Apple's FY2022 are unreasonably high and likely contributing to the recent weakness.\nApple's Price/Earnings, Price/Sales, and Price/Free Cash flow still remain significantly elevated to historical levels.\nI have serious doubt that iPhone, iPad, and Mac sales can continue the current hot sales pace over the next year.\n\nPhoto by PeskyMonkey/iStock Editorial via Getty Images\nApple (AAPL) bulls have to be frustrated. Despite massive earnings beats in both its Q1 holiday quarter and Q2 January-March quarter, the shares have gone no where. The thesis from my last article on Apple, that COVID-19 lockdowns, government handouts, and the launch of 5G all culminated to pull demand into Apple's FY21 year,gained a supporter from analysts at New Street, who are now predicting the same.\n\nNew Street isn't predicting that the sky is falling, and neither am I. They are just modelingiPhone shipments in the 180M-200M range versus the 234M consensus.Does this sound like an extreme view? I don't think it is, especially since SA Contributor Paulo Santos has been tracking iPhone sales in China and has seen a significant slowdown from the white-hot start to the beginning of this year. I think similar slowdowns for iPad and Mac are a few quarters away.\nWhat is AAPL's current valuation? Does it make sense?\nFrom the comments I've received on my last two articles, bulls must think I hate Apple and have an axe to grind. This could not be further from the truth. I've owned Apple outright many times in the past, and still own a significant stake in it through my Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.B) holdings. So I'm not rooting against it by any stretch, I'm just calling it like I see it - and I see the valuation as very stretched.\nData by YCharts\nApple's Price/Earnings, Price/Sales, and Price/Free Cash flow still remain significantly elevated- 50% or more - from their historic norms.\n\nThis is a key issue because the forward revenue growth and earnings estimates for Apple are already low and predict minimal growth. At these rates, nearly all of the earnings growth would come from the share repurchases.\nBut these forward estimates assume Apple will repeat the record year they are having again in FY2022. I think the odds of that happening are slim. Instead, I expect a similar situation of what happened between FY2014-FY2016, where operating earnings increased significantly from FY2014 to FY2015, then declined moderately in FY2016.\nApple's FY21 could be peak sales and earnings for a long time\nSince 2016, Apple has introduced a lot of successful new products: the Apple Watch, AirPods, and Apple TV, to go along with many new versions of Mac, iPhone, and iPad, along with impressive growth in Services.\nYet with all of that success, Apple's Operating Income peaked in 2015 until shattering the prior peak over the last 12 months. From 2015-2020, Apple was able to grow EPS roughly 7%, with significant help from share repurchases and the TCJA corporate income tax cut. (Without this tax cut, 2020 EPS would have been ~$2.88 rather than $3.28, implying an EPS growth rate of around 4.5%.)\n\nUltimately, I believe Apple's recent torrid sales performance will not be repeated and should not be considered a new run rate like Wall Street analysts are modeling. I look at iPad sales as an illustration of this. For the last several years, volumes had been steady until exploding 57% last year and continuing the same strength early this year.\n\nDid iPads suddenly become so much more popular? Or were there just a lot of parents working from home that wanted iPads for their kids? I'm going with the latter.\nConclusion - Apple is still a Sell\nWall St. analysts wasted no time increasing earnings expectations for next year based on what I believe is mostly an extrapolation of the current results.\nAdmittedly, I'm less bullish on the 5G Supercycle than most. I believe that the innovators and early adopters will rush to upgrade, but most of the mass market will remain on the normal upgrade cadence, which continues to lengthen. I think the iPhone is a victim of its own success - that the recent iPhones are all so good, upgrading to newer phones is less compelling, and because 4G is \"good enough\" for most people.\n\nApple earned $2.97 in 2019. They've already earned $3.08 in the first two quarters of this year and current estimates are $5.16 for the full fiscal. Even with the growth in Services, I just do not see them repeating this performance next fiscal year, and expect earnings closer to the $4-4.50/share range, far short of the $5.30 that's currently expected. That would put Price/Earnings back above 30 with a negative growth rate. If this happens, shares could retest the $100 level.\nApple is still a sell here for me. It's a great company that's simply priced too richly. Valuation always matters.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":222,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":194360032,"gmtCreate":1621343459026,"gmtModify":1704356094424,"author":{"id":"3570426503709368","authorId":"3570426503709368","name":"CWei92","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/63c5dff1b0ab726006ec156ccbcb83c2","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570426503709368","authorIdStr":"3570426503709368"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"like and comment thanks","listText":"like and comment thanks","text":"like and comment thanks","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/194360032","repostId":"2135161248","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2135161248","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1621343169,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2135161248?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-05-18 21:06","market":"us","language":"en","title":"JD.com to Report Q1 Earnings: What's in the Cards?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2135161248","media":"Zacks","summary":"JD.com, Inc. is scheduled to report first-quarter 2021 results on May 19.\nFor the first quarter, the","content":"<p><b>JD.com, Inc.</b>&nbsp;is scheduled to report first-quarter 2021 results on May 19.</p>\n<p>For the first quarter, the Zacks Consensus Estimate for revenues is pegged at $29.9 billion, indicating an improvement of 44.9% from the year-ago reported figure.</p>\n<p>Further, the consensus mark for earnings is pegged at 39 cents per share, indicating a 39.3% rise from the previous-year reported figure.</p>\n<p>Notably, the company delivered an earnings surprise of 4.6% in the last reported quarter.</p>\n<p><b>JD.com, Inc. Price and EPS Surprise</b></p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c1fed1c36f6a8ce20878c0d2e594f77c\" tg-width=\"534\" tg-height=\"262\"><span>JD.com, Inc. price-eps-surprise | JD.com, Inc. Quote</span></p>\n<p><b>Key Factors to Note</b></p>\n<p>The company’s JD Retail segment, comprising the e-commerce business, is expected to have been the key catalyst in the first quarter.</p>\n<p>The launch of flagship stores of popular fashion and luxury brands like John Lobb, Stefano Ricci, Vivienne Westwoodon and Anya Hindmarch, among others, on JD.com is likely to have driven customer momentum, which in turn is expected to have aided the performance of JD Retail during the quarter-to-be-reported.</p>\n<p>JD retail’s omni-channel initiatives are anticipated to have contributed well to top-line growth of the segment in the first quarter.</p>\n<p>Moreover, the company’s collaboration with Italian luxury brands Prada and MiuMiu, which bolstered its omni-channel efforts, might have been a positive.</p>\n<p>Furthermore, growing momentum of JD health that offers free online medical consultation and online pharmacy retail services is likely to get reflected in the company’s to-be-reported quarter’s results.</p>\n<p>Growing investments in research and development are also likely to have been encouraging for the company in the quarter under review.</p>\n<p>Additionally, the new businesses segment comprising technology, supply chain and logistics services is expected to have helped it in gaining traction across lower-tier cities in the first quarter.</p>\n<p>Moreover, the well-performing Jingxi Business Group is expected to have aided JD.com’s performance in the lower-tier cities.</p>\n<p>However, increasing fulfilment, marketing, and research and development expenses are likely to have been major risks to the company’s profitability in the quarter under review.</p>\n<p>Moreover, increasing competitive pressure from Alibaba in the e-commerce market might be reflected in first-quarter results.</p>\n<p><b>What Our Model Says</b></p>\n<p>Our proven model does not conclusively predict an earnings beat for JD.com this time around. The combination of a positiveEarnings ESPand a Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy), 2 (Buy) or 3 (Hold) increases the odds of an earnings beat. But that’s not the case here. You can uncover the best stocks to buy or sell before they’re reported with ourEarnings ESP Filter.</p>\n<p>JD.com has an Earnings ESP of -14.83% and a Zacks Rank #5 (Strong Sell), at present.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>JD.com to Report Q1 Earnings: What's in the Cards?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nJD.com to Report Q1 Earnings: What's in the Cards?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-05-18 21:06 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.zacks.com/stock/news/1541348/jdcom-jd-to-report-q1-earnings-whats-in-the-cards?art_rec=quote-stock_overview-zacks_news-ID02-txt-1541348><strong>Zacks</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>JD.com, Inc. is scheduled to report first-quarter 2021 results on May 19.\nFor the first quarter, the Zacks Consensus Estimate for revenues is pegged at $29.9 billion, indicating an improvement of ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.zacks.com/stock/news/1541348/jdcom-jd-to-report-q1-earnings-whats-in-the-cards?art_rec=quote-stock_overview-zacks_news-ID02-txt-1541348\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"09618":"京东集团-SW","JD":"京东"},"source_url":"https://www.zacks.com/stock/news/1541348/jdcom-jd-to-report-q1-earnings-whats-in-the-cards?art_rec=quote-stock_overview-zacks_news-ID02-txt-1541348","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2135161248","content_text":"JD.com, Inc. is scheduled to report first-quarter 2021 results on May 19.\nFor the first quarter, the Zacks Consensus Estimate for revenues is pegged at $29.9 billion, indicating an improvement of 44.9% from the year-ago reported figure.\nFurther, the consensus mark for earnings is pegged at 39 cents per share, indicating a 39.3% rise from the previous-year reported figure.\nNotably, the company delivered an earnings surprise of 4.6% in the last reported quarter.\nJD.com, Inc. Price and EPS Surprise\nJD.com, Inc. price-eps-surprise | JD.com, Inc. Quote\nKey Factors to Note\nThe company’s JD Retail segment, comprising the e-commerce business, is expected to have been the key catalyst in the first quarter.\nThe launch of flagship stores of popular fashion and luxury brands like John Lobb, Stefano Ricci, Vivienne Westwoodon and Anya Hindmarch, among others, on JD.com is likely to have driven customer momentum, which in turn is expected to have aided the performance of JD Retail during the quarter-to-be-reported.\nJD retail’s omni-channel initiatives are anticipated to have contributed well to top-line growth of the segment in the first quarter.\nMoreover, the company’s collaboration with Italian luxury brands Prada and MiuMiu, which bolstered its omni-channel efforts, might have been a positive.\nFurthermore, growing momentum of JD health that offers free online medical consultation and online pharmacy retail services is likely to get reflected in the company’s to-be-reported quarter’s results.\nGrowing investments in research and development are also likely to have been encouraging for the company in the quarter under review.\nAdditionally, the new businesses segment comprising technology, supply chain and logistics services is expected to have helped it in gaining traction across lower-tier cities in the first quarter.\nMoreover, the well-performing Jingxi Business Group is expected to have aided JD.com’s performance in the lower-tier cities.\nHowever, increasing fulfilment, marketing, and research and development expenses are likely to have been major risks to the company’s profitability in the quarter under review.\nMoreover, increasing competitive pressure from Alibaba in the e-commerce market might be reflected in first-quarter results.\nWhat Our Model Says\nOur proven model does not conclusively predict an earnings beat for JD.com this time around. The combination of a positiveEarnings ESPand a Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy), 2 (Buy) or 3 (Hold) increases the odds of an earnings beat. But that’s not the case here. You can uncover the best stocks to buy or sell before they’re reported with ourEarnings ESP Filter.\nJD.com has an Earnings ESP of -14.83% and a Zacks Rank #5 (Strong Sell), at present.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":264,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":192923176,"gmtCreate":1621138523995,"gmtModify":1704353269480,"author":{"id":"3570426503709368","authorId":"3570426503709368","name":"CWei92","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/63c5dff1b0ab726006ec156ccbcb83c2","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570426503709368","authorIdStr":"3570426503709368"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"like and comment","listText":"like and comment","text":"like and comment","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/192923176","repostId":"1163454382","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1163454382","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1621004581,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1163454382?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-05-14 23:03","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why AMC Entertainment Stock Jumped Again Friday","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1163454382","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"AMC investors have reason for more optimism on the heels of another capital raise.Yesterday's jump came after the company announcedit raised $428 million. First, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention  issued a new statement on current health and safety protocols saying that fully vaccinated people can resume activities without wearing a mask or physically distancing, including indoors.This should allow theaters to open back up at full capacity and be a desirable destination for vaccinat","content":"<blockquote>\n <b>AMC investors have reason for more optimism on the heels of another capital raise.</b>\n</blockquote>\n<p><b>What happened</b></p>\n<p>A day after<b>AMC Entertainment Holdings</b>(NYSE:AMC)</p>\n<p><b>So what</b></p>\n<p>Yesterday's jump came after the company announcedit raised $428 million</p>\n<p>First, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) issued a new statement on current health and safety protocols saying that fully vaccinated people can resume activities without wearing a mask or physically distancing, including indoors.</p>\n<p>This should allow theaters to open back up at full capacity and be a desirable destination for vaccinated movie patrons. Also yesterday,<b>Walt Disney</b>(NYSE:DIS)announced its quarterly earnings report, and CEO Bob Chapek noted \"increased production at our studios.\" While that is a positive for theater operators, Disney also reported disappointing subscriber growth in itsstreaming services.</p>\n<p><b>Now what</b></p>\n<p>Lower streaming subscriptions could be a positive sign for the theater business. As vaccinations continue to roll out, and with the CDC now officially giving its approval to gather indoors with crowds and without masks, theater attendance may resume quickly.</p>\n<p>Vaccinations are going to drive people back to activities outside the home. Movie theaters are likely to be a favorite destination after more than a year of mostly watching at home. On the heels of another capital raise, AMC investors may be thinking this company finally has a promising path ahead.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why AMC Entertainment Stock Jumped Again Friday</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy AMC Entertainment Stock Jumped Again Friday\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-05-14 23:03 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/05/14/why-amc-entertainment-stock-jumped-again-friday/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>AMC investors have reason for more optimism on the heels of another capital raise.\n\nWhat happened\nA day afterAMC Entertainment Holdings(NYSE:AMC)\nSo what\nYesterday's jump came after the company ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/05/14/why-amc-entertainment-stock-jumped-again-friday/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AMC":"AMC院线"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/05/14/why-amc-entertainment-stock-jumped-again-friday/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1163454382","content_text":"AMC investors have reason for more optimism on the heels of another capital raise.\n\nWhat happened\nA day afterAMC Entertainment Holdings(NYSE:AMC)\nSo what\nYesterday's jump came after the company announcedit raised $428 million\nFirst, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) issued a new statement on current health and safety protocols saying that fully vaccinated people can resume activities without wearing a mask or physically distancing, including indoors.\nThis should allow theaters to open back up at full capacity and be a desirable destination for vaccinated movie patrons. Also yesterday,Walt Disney(NYSE:DIS)announced its quarterly earnings report, and CEO Bob Chapek noted \"increased production at our studios.\" While that is a positive for theater operators, Disney also reported disappointing subscriber growth in itsstreaming services.\nNow what\nLower streaming subscriptions could be a positive sign for the theater business. As vaccinations continue to roll out, and with the CDC now officially giving its approval to gather indoors with crowds and without masks, theater attendance may resume quickly.\nVaccinations are going to drive people back to activities outside the home. Movie theaters are likely to be a favorite destination after more than a year of mostly watching at home. On the heels of another capital raise, AMC investors may be thinking this company finally has a promising path ahead.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":537,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":192929639,"gmtCreate":1621138489321,"gmtModify":1704353268173,"author":{"id":"3570426503709368","authorId":"3570426503709368","name":"CWei92","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/63c5dff1b0ab726006ec156ccbcb83c2","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570426503709368","authorIdStr":"3570426503709368"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"nice","listText":"nice","text":"nice","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/192929639","repostId":"2135069756","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2135069756","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"The leading daily newsletter for the latest financial and business news. 33Yrs Helping Stock Investors with Investing Insights, Tools, News & More.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Investors","id":"1085713068","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/608dd68a89ed486e18f64efe3136266c"},"pubTimestamp":1621000800,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2135069756?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-05-14 22:00","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Afraid Of Inflation? Four Ways To Protect Your Stocks","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2135069756","media":"Investors","summary":"The scare of inflation is threatening the S&P 500. But if you know what to expect, signs of rising prices aren't always kryptonite to your portfolio.","content":"<p>The scare of inflation is threatening the S&amp;P 500. But if you know what to expect, signs of rising prices aren't always kryptonite to your portfolio. And that's if you should worry at all.</p>\n<p>It turns out S&amp;P 500 sectors follow a fairly predictable playbook in times of rising prices. If you're worried about inflation, S&amp;P 500 sectors like energy, materials and real estate provide some safety, analysts say. \"Investors have used the threat of a spike in inflation, and now the confirmation from ... surprise strength in headline and core Consumer Price Index readings, to take profits in stocks,\" said Sam Stovall, strategist at CFRA.</p>\n<p>But knowing the facts goes a long way in dealing with any potential market shocks, including inflation.</p>\n<h3>Know The Reality In Inflation Numbers</h3>\n<p>It's important to understand what inflation numbers are truly telling you before you panic. It seems like many S&amp;P 500 investors calmed down after digging into inflation numbers more closely. The world's most popular index jumped more than 1.2% Thursday, making up the bulk of Wednesday's 2% freak-out sell-off.</p>\n<p>At first glance, inflation numbers looked scary. The 4.2% jump in headline inflation and 3% rise in core inflation was much more than anyone thought. Core inflation hasn't jumped that fast on a year-over-year basis since 2008, Stovall says.</p>\n<p>But a big piece of the rise is due to the 21% jump in annualized used vehicle prices, says Nicholas Colas, co-founder of DataTrek Research. And that jump is due to new vehicle shortages arising from a shortage in semiconductors. Backing out this short-term disruption, headline inflation was a much more normal 3.6%, he says. Meanwhile, the unusual 49.6% jump in April gasoline prices added to the distortion.</p>\n<p>The inflation number \"just doesn't hold up to scrutiny as a warning bell about inflation,\" Colas said.</p>\n<h3>Understand How The S&amp;P 500 Reacts To Inflation</h3>\n<p>Out-of-control inflation is widely feared. But times of lingering 5%-plus annual inflation are rare. Only twice since 1928 has U.S. inflation lingered: 1941 through 1951 and 1969 to 1982, Colas found.</p>\n<p>Were these periods devastating for the S&amp;P 500? Hardly. The S&amp;P 500 jumped 310% from 1941 to 1951, that's 121.1% adjusted for inflation, Colas found. Even in the 1969-to-1982 period, seen as a terrible time for inflation, the S&amp;P 500 actually rose 176%. Yes, that's a loss of 11.6% adjusted for inflation, but it's hardly catastrophic especially for those who enjoyed the 1980s bull.</p>\n<p>Inflation itself doesn't steer the S&amp;P 500. The reason for inflation matters more. Prices rose in the 1940s for \"good reasons\" like an post-war boom, Colas said. But in the 1970s, energy price hikes were largely a tax on the economy.</p>\n<p>\"Markets are volatile because they're not sure which sort of inflation we have at present, or what (if anything) the Federal Reserve may do to bring inflation down,\" Colas said. \"That's enough uncertainty to create the volatility we're seeing, but not enough to say equities will necessarily underperform inflation in the years to come.\"</p>\n<h3>Look To The 1970s For S&amp;P 500 Clues (But Not Gospel)</h3>\n<p>S&amp;P 500 investors like to look back at the 1970s for a playbook for inflation. And it wasn't pretty, but it's not as devastating as many think either. And there were actually places to make big gains.</p>\n<p>During the 1970s, the S&amp;P 500 posted an average monthly loss of 0.3%, Stovall says. But over the entire period, the S&amp;P 500 rose 17.2%. That's just 1.6% annualized, or a fraction of the S&amp;P 500's typical 10% yearly return. S&amp;P sectors, though, hold clues or how markets can shift, Stovall says.</p>\n<p>It turns out even during the \"bad\" inflation of the 1970s, only <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE\">one</a> of the 11 S&amp;P 500 sectors fell on an average monthly basis. That sole loser was financials, which lost 0.8% monthly on average during the 1970s.</p>\n<p>So where where the places to be? S&amp;P 50 energy, materials and real estate all posted average monthly gains of 1% or higher during the 1970s, Stovall says. Materials company <b>Nucor</b> gained 2,830% during the 1970s. That's more than any current S&amp;P 500 members did at the time. Meanwhile, energy firms <b>Schlumberger</b> and <b>Baker Hughes</b> jumped 1,032% and 856%, respectively, during the 1970s.</p>\n<table>\n <thead>\n  <tr>\n   <th>Sector</th>\n   <th>Average monthly return during the 1970s</th>\n  </tr>\n </thead>\n <tbody>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Energy</td>\n   <td>1.6%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Materials</td>\n   <td>1.4</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Real Estate</td>\n   <td>1.2</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Communications Services</td>\n   <td>0.9</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Information Technology</td>\n   <td>0.7</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Industrials</td>\n   <td>0.6</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Consumer Discretionary</td>\n   <td>0.3</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Utilities</td>\n   <td>0.1</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Health Care</td>\n   <td>0.1</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Consumer Staples</td>\n   <td>0</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Financials</td>\n   <td>-0.8</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>S&amp;P 500</td>\n   <td>-0.3</td>\n  </tr>\n </tbody>\n</table>\n<h5>Source: CFRA</h5>\n<h3>Don't Overlook S&amp;P 500 Commodity Strength</h3>\n<p>Digging deeper still, Stovall found robust gains in many commodities markets, even in the inflation-plagued 1970s.</p>\n<p>Gold and precious metals companies in the S&amp;P 500 posted average monthly gains of 3.9% in the 1970s. And aluminum companies rose 2% monthly followed by oil and gas drilling at 1.8%. And to some degree, investors are already nibbling on these areas. The Energy Select Sector SPDR is up 36.7% this year. That's the top run of any S&amp;P 500 sector. Meanwhile, the Materials Select Sector SPDR is up 20% year to date.</p>\n<p>Know, too, simply owning the S&amp;P 500 may not offer great exposure to areas that held up to inflation before. These sectors hold small weights in the S&amp;P 500. Energy holds just a 2.9% weight in the S&amp;P 500. Meanwhile, materials account for 2.9% and real estate 2.5%. ETFs can fill in the gaps.</p>\n<p>ETFs and exchange-traded notes, too, can offer inflation protection. The $60 billion in assets SPDR Gold Trust moves with the price of gold. The $3 billion in assets United States Oil Fund tracks the price of crude oil. And the <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/EEME\">iShares</a> TIPS Bond ETF tracks U.S. Treasuries, adjusted for inflation.</p>\n<p>But just know inflation, alone, doesn't determine S&amp;P 500 returns. \"Inflation is just <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> input into equity prices and returns, and on its own it explains very little about how stocks will do over the longer term,\" Colas says.</p>\n<h3>Top S&amp;P 500 Stocks In The 1970s</h3>\n<table>\n <thead>\n  <tr>\n   <th>Company</th>\n   <th>Symbol</th>\n   <th>70's % ch.</th>\n   <th>Stock YTD % ch.</th>\n   <th>Sector</th>\n   <th>Composite Rating</th>\n  </tr>\n </thead>\n <tbody>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Nucor</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>2,830.3%</td>\n   <td>89.5%</td>\n   <td>Materials</td>\n   <td>99</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Schlumberger</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>1,031.7%</td>\n   <td>45.5%</td>\n   <td>Energy</td>\n   <td>72</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Baker Hughes</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>856.4%</td>\n   <td>16.8%</td>\n   <td>Energy</td>\n   <td>78</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Archer Daniels Midland</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>742.5%</td>\n   <td>33.2%</td>\n   <td>Consumer Staples</td>\n   <td>90</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Teleflex</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>597.3%</td>\n   <td>-4.7%</td>\n   <td>Health Care</td>\n   <td>45</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>General Dynamics</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>445.0%</td>\n   <td>28.5%</td>\n   <td>Industrials</td>\n   <td>65</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Boeing</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>440.0%</td>\n   <td>4.0%</td>\n   <td>Industrials</td>\n   <td>35</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/HFC\">HollyFrontier</a></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>427.3%</td>\n   <td>31.1%</td>\n   <td>Energy</td>\n   <td>42</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Halliburton</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>417.8%</td>\n   <td>18.4%</td>\n   <td>Energy</td>\n   <td>63</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Tyler Technologies</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>347.3%</td>\n   <td>-11.3%</td>\n   <td>Information Technology</td>\n   <td>45</td>\n  </tr>\n </tbody>\n</table>\n<h5>Sources: IBD, S&amp;P Global Market Intelligence</h5>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Afraid Of Inflation? Four Ways To Protect Your Stocks</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAfraid Of Inflation? Four Ways To Protect Your Stocks\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/608dd68a89ed486e18f64efe3136266c);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Investors </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-05-14 22:00</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>The scare of inflation is threatening the S&amp;P 500. But if you know what to expect, signs of rising prices aren't always kryptonite to your portfolio. And that's if you should worry at all.</p>\n<p>It turns out S&amp;P 500 sectors follow a fairly predictable playbook in times of rising prices. If you're worried about inflation, S&amp;P 500 sectors like energy, materials and real estate provide some safety, analysts say. \"Investors have used the threat of a spike in inflation, and now the confirmation from ... surprise strength in headline and core Consumer Price Index readings, to take profits in stocks,\" said Sam Stovall, strategist at CFRA.</p>\n<p>But knowing the facts goes a long way in dealing with any potential market shocks, including inflation.</p>\n<h3>Know The Reality In Inflation Numbers</h3>\n<p>It's important to understand what inflation numbers are truly telling you before you panic. It seems like many S&amp;P 500 investors calmed down after digging into inflation numbers more closely. The world's most popular index jumped more than 1.2% Thursday, making up the bulk of Wednesday's 2% freak-out sell-off.</p>\n<p>At first glance, inflation numbers looked scary. The 4.2% jump in headline inflation and 3% rise in core inflation was much more than anyone thought. Core inflation hasn't jumped that fast on a year-over-year basis since 2008, Stovall says.</p>\n<p>But a big piece of the rise is due to the 21% jump in annualized used vehicle prices, says Nicholas Colas, co-founder of DataTrek Research. And that jump is due to new vehicle shortages arising from a shortage in semiconductors. Backing out this short-term disruption, headline inflation was a much more normal 3.6%, he says. Meanwhile, the unusual 49.6% jump in April gasoline prices added to the distortion.</p>\n<p>The inflation number \"just doesn't hold up to scrutiny as a warning bell about inflation,\" Colas said.</p>\n<h3>Understand How The S&amp;P 500 Reacts To Inflation</h3>\n<p>Out-of-control inflation is widely feared. But times of lingering 5%-plus annual inflation are rare. Only twice since 1928 has U.S. inflation lingered: 1941 through 1951 and 1969 to 1982, Colas found.</p>\n<p>Were these periods devastating for the S&amp;P 500? Hardly. The S&amp;P 500 jumped 310% from 1941 to 1951, that's 121.1% adjusted for inflation, Colas found. Even in the 1969-to-1982 period, seen as a terrible time for inflation, the S&amp;P 500 actually rose 176%. Yes, that's a loss of 11.6% adjusted for inflation, but it's hardly catastrophic especially for those who enjoyed the 1980s bull.</p>\n<p>Inflation itself doesn't steer the S&amp;P 500. The reason for inflation matters more. Prices rose in the 1940s for \"good reasons\" like an post-war boom, Colas said. But in the 1970s, energy price hikes were largely a tax on the economy.</p>\n<p>\"Markets are volatile because they're not sure which sort of inflation we have at present, or what (if anything) the Federal Reserve may do to bring inflation down,\" Colas said. \"That's enough uncertainty to create the volatility we're seeing, but not enough to say equities will necessarily underperform inflation in the years to come.\"</p>\n<h3>Look To The 1970s For S&amp;P 500 Clues (But Not Gospel)</h3>\n<p>S&amp;P 500 investors like to look back at the 1970s for a playbook for inflation. And it wasn't pretty, but it's not as devastating as many think either. And there were actually places to make big gains.</p>\n<p>During the 1970s, the S&amp;P 500 posted an average monthly loss of 0.3%, Stovall says. But over the entire period, the S&amp;P 500 rose 17.2%. That's just 1.6% annualized, or a fraction of the S&amp;P 500's typical 10% yearly return. S&amp;P sectors, though, hold clues or how markets can shift, Stovall says.</p>\n<p>It turns out even during the \"bad\" inflation of the 1970s, only <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE\">one</a> of the 11 S&amp;P 500 sectors fell on an average monthly basis. That sole loser was financials, which lost 0.8% monthly on average during the 1970s.</p>\n<p>So where where the places to be? S&amp;P 50 energy, materials and real estate all posted average monthly gains of 1% or higher during the 1970s, Stovall says. Materials company <b>Nucor</b> gained 2,830% during the 1970s. That's more than any current S&amp;P 500 members did at the time. Meanwhile, energy firms <b>Schlumberger</b> and <b>Baker Hughes</b> jumped 1,032% and 856%, respectively, during the 1970s.</p>\n<table>\n <thead>\n  <tr>\n   <th>Sector</th>\n   <th>Average monthly return during the 1970s</th>\n  </tr>\n </thead>\n <tbody>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Energy</td>\n   <td>1.6%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Materials</td>\n   <td>1.4</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Real Estate</td>\n   <td>1.2</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Communications Services</td>\n   <td>0.9</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Information Technology</td>\n   <td>0.7</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Industrials</td>\n   <td>0.6</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Consumer Discretionary</td>\n   <td>0.3</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Utilities</td>\n   <td>0.1</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Health Care</td>\n   <td>0.1</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Consumer Staples</td>\n   <td>0</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Financials</td>\n   <td>-0.8</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>S&amp;P 500</td>\n   <td>-0.3</td>\n  </tr>\n </tbody>\n</table>\n<h5>Source: CFRA</h5>\n<h3>Don't Overlook S&amp;P 500 Commodity Strength</h3>\n<p>Digging deeper still, Stovall found robust gains in many commodities markets, even in the inflation-plagued 1970s.</p>\n<p>Gold and precious metals companies in the S&amp;P 500 posted average monthly gains of 3.9% in the 1970s. And aluminum companies rose 2% monthly followed by oil and gas drilling at 1.8%. And to some degree, investors are already nibbling on these areas. The Energy Select Sector SPDR is up 36.7% this year. That's the top run of any S&amp;P 500 sector. Meanwhile, the Materials Select Sector SPDR is up 20% year to date.</p>\n<p>Know, too, simply owning the S&amp;P 500 may not offer great exposure to areas that held up to inflation before. These sectors hold small weights in the S&amp;P 500. Energy holds just a 2.9% weight in the S&amp;P 500. Meanwhile, materials account for 2.9% and real estate 2.5%. ETFs can fill in the gaps.</p>\n<p>ETFs and exchange-traded notes, too, can offer inflation protection. The $60 billion in assets SPDR Gold Trust moves with the price of gold. The $3 billion in assets United States Oil Fund tracks the price of crude oil. And the <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/EEME\">iShares</a> TIPS Bond ETF tracks U.S. Treasuries, adjusted for inflation.</p>\n<p>But just know inflation, alone, doesn't determine S&amp;P 500 returns. \"Inflation is just <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> input into equity prices and returns, and on its own it explains very little about how stocks will do over the longer term,\" Colas says.</p>\n<h3>Top S&amp;P 500 Stocks In The 1970s</h3>\n<table>\n <thead>\n  <tr>\n   <th>Company</th>\n   <th>Symbol</th>\n   <th>70's % ch.</th>\n   <th>Stock YTD % ch.</th>\n   <th>Sector</th>\n   <th>Composite Rating</th>\n  </tr>\n </thead>\n <tbody>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Nucor</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>2,830.3%</td>\n   <td>89.5%</td>\n   <td>Materials</td>\n   <td>99</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Schlumberger</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>1,031.7%</td>\n   <td>45.5%</td>\n   <td>Energy</td>\n   <td>72</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Baker Hughes</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>856.4%</td>\n   <td>16.8%</td>\n   <td>Energy</td>\n   <td>78</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Archer Daniels Midland</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>742.5%</td>\n   <td>33.2%</td>\n   <td>Consumer Staples</td>\n   <td>90</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Teleflex</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>597.3%</td>\n   <td>-4.7%</td>\n   <td>Health Care</td>\n   <td>45</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>General Dynamics</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>445.0%</td>\n   <td>28.5%</td>\n   <td>Industrials</td>\n   <td>65</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Boeing</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>440.0%</td>\n   <td>4.0%</td>\n   <td>Industrials</td>\n   <td>35</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/HFC\">HollyFrontier</a></td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>427.3%</td>\n   <td>31.1%</td>\n   <td>Energy</td>\n   <td>42</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Halliburton</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>417.8%</td>\n   <td>18.4%</td>\n   <td>Energy</td>\n   <td>63</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Tyler Technologies</td>\n   <td></td>\n   <td>347.3%</td>\n   <td>-11.3%</td>\n   <td>Information Technology</td>\n   <td>45</td>\n  </tr>\n </tbody>\n</table>\n<h5>Sources: IBD, S&amp;P Global Market Intelligence</h5>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"161125":"标普500","513500":"标普500ETF","SH":"标普500反向ETF","SPY":"标普500ETF","SSO":"两倍做多标普500ETF","IVV":"标普500指数ETF","SDS":"两倍做空标普500ETF","UPRO":"三倍做多标普500ETF","SPXU":"三倍做空标普500ETF",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","OEX":"标普100","OEF":"标普100指数ETF-iShares"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2135069756","content_text":"The scare of inflation is threatening the S&P 500. But if you know what to expect, signs of rising prices aren't always kryptonite to your portfolio. And that's if you should worry at all.\nIt turns out S&P 500 sectors follow a fairly predictable playbook in times of rising prices. If you're worried about inflation, S&P 500 sectors like energy, materials and real estate provide some safety, analysts say. \"Investors have used the threat of a spike in inflation, and now the confirmation from ... surprise strength in headline and core Consumer Price Index readings, to take profits in stocks,\" said Sam Stovall, strategist at CFRA.\nBut knowing the facts goes a long way in dealing with any potential market shocks, including inflation.\nKnow The Reality In Inflation Numbers\nIt's important to understand what inflation numbers are truly telling you before you panic. It seems like many S&P 500 investors calmed down after digging into inflation numbers more closely. The world's most popular index jumped more than 1.2% Thursday, making up the bulk of Wednesday's 2% freak-out sell-off.\nAt first glance, inflation numbers looked scary. The 4.2% jump in headline inflation and 3% rise in core inflation was much more than anyone thought. Core inflation hasn't jumped that fast on a year-over-year basis since 2008, Stovall says.\nBut a big piece of the rise is due to the 21% jump in annualized used vehicle prices, says Nicholas Colas, co-founder of DataTrek Research. And that jump is due to new vehicle shortages arising from a shortage in semiconductors. Backing out this short-term disruption, headline inflation was a much more normal 3.6%, he says. Meanwhile, the unusual 49.6% jump in April gasoline prices added to the distortion.\nThe inflation number \"just doesn't hold up to scrutiny as a warning bell about inflation,\" Colas said.\nUnderstand How The S&P 500 Reacts To Inflation\nOut-of-control inflation is widely feared. But times of lingering 5%-plus annual inflation are rare. Only twice since 1928 has U.S. inflation lingered: 1941 through 1951 and 1969 to 1982, Colas found.\nWere these periods devastating for the S&P 500? Hardly. The S&P 500 jumped 310% from 1941 to 1951, that's 121.1% adjusted for inflation, Colas found. Even in the 1969-to-1982 period, seen as a terrible time for inflation, the S&P 500 actually rose 176%. Yes, that's a loss of 11.6% adjusted for inflation, but it's hardly catastrophic especially for those who enjoyed the 1980s bull.\nInflation itself doesn't steer the S&P 500. The reason for inflation matters more. Prices rose in the 1940s for \"good reasons\" like an post-war boom, Colas said. But in the 1970s, energy price hikes were largely a tax on the economy.\n\"Markets are volatile because they're not sure which sort of inflation we have at present, or what (if anything) the Federal Reserve may do to bring inflation down,\" Colas said. \"That's enough uncertainty to create the volatility we're seeing, but not enough to say equities will necessarily underperform inflation in the years to come.\"\nLook To The 1970s For S&P 500 Clues (But Not Gospel)\nS&P 500 investors like to look back at the 1970s for a playbook for inflation. And it wasn't pretty, but it's not as devastating as many think either. And there were actually places to make big gains.\nDuring the 1970s, the S&P 500 posted an average monthly loss of 0.3%, Stovall says. But over the entire period, the S&P 500 rose 17.2%. That's just 1.6% annualized, or a fraction of the S&P 500's typical 10% yearly return. S&P sectors, though, hold clues or how markets can shift, Stovall says.\nIt turns out even during the \"bad\" inflation of the 1970s, only one of the 11 S&P 500 sectors fell on an average monthly basis. That sole loser was financials, which lost 0.8% monthly on average during the 1970s.\nSo where where the places to be? S&P 50 energy, materials and real estate all posted average monthly gains of 1% or higher during the 1970s, Stovall says. Materials company Nucor gained 2,830% during the 1970s. That's more than any current S&P 500 members did at the time. Meanwhile, energy firms Schlumberger and Baker Hughes jumped 1,032% and 856%, respectively, during the 1970s.\n\n\n\nSector\nAverage monthly return during the 1970s\n\n\n\n\nEnergy\n1.6%\n\n\nMaterials\n1.4\n\n\nReal Estate\n1.2\n\n\nCommunications Services\n0.9\n\n\nInformation Technology\n0.7\n\n\nIndustrials\n0.6\n\n\nConsumer Discretionary\n0.3\n\n\nUtilities\n0.1\n\n\nHealth Care\n0.1\n\n\nConsumer Staples\n0\n\n\nFinancials\n-0.8\n\n\nS&P 500\n-0.3\n\n\n\nSource: CFRA\nDon't Overlook S&P 500 Commodity Strength\nDigging deeper still, Stovall found robust gains in many commodities markets, even in the inflation-plagued 1970s.\nGold and precious metals companies in the S&P 500 posted average monthly gains of 3.9% in the 1970s. And aluminum companies rose 2% monthly followed by oil and gas drilling at 1.8%. And to some degree, investors are already nibbling on these areas. The Energy Select Sector SPDR is up 36.7% this year. That's the top run of any S&P 500 sector. Meanwhile, the Materials Select Sector SPDR is up 20% year to date.\nKnow, too, simply owning the S&P 500 may not offer great exposure to areas that held up to inflation before. These sectors hold small weights in the S&P 500. Energy holds just a 2.9% weight in the S&P 500. Meanwhile, materials account for 2.9% and real estate 2.5%. ETFs can fill in the gaps.\nETFs and exchange-traded notes, too, can offer inflation protection. The $60 billion in assets SPDR Gold Trust moves with the price of gold. The $3 billion in assets United States Oil Fund tracks the price of crude oil. And the iShares TIPS Bond ETF tracks U.S. Treasuries, adjusted for inflation.\nBut just know inflation, alone, doesn't determine S&P 500 returns. \"Inflation is just one input into equity prices and returns, and on its own it explains very little about how stocks will do over the longer term,\" Colas says.\nTop S&P 500 Stocks In The 1970s\n\n\n\nCompany\nSymbol\n70's % ch.\nStock YTD % ch.\nSector\nComposite Rating\n\n\n\n\nNucor\n\n2,830.3%\n89.5%\nMaterials\n99\n\n\nSchlumberger\n\n1,031.7%\n45.5%\nEnergy\n72\n\n\nBaker Hughes\n\n856.4%\n16.8%\nEnergy\n78\n\n\nArcher Daniels Midland\n\n742.5%\n33.2%\nConsumer Staples\n90\n\n\nTeleflex\n\n597.3%\n-4.7%\nHealth Care\n45\n\n\nGeneral Dynamics\n\n445.0%\n28.5%\nIndustrials\n65\n\n\nBoeing\n\n440.0%\n4.0%\nIndustrials\n35\n\n\nHollyFrontier\n\n427.3%\n31.1%\nEnergy\n42\n\n\nHalliburton\n\n417.8%\n18.4%\nEnergy\n63\n\n\nTyler Technologies\n\n347.3%\n-11.3%\nInformation Technology\n45\n\n\n\nSources: IBD, S&P Global Market Intelligence","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":586,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":198577679,"gmtCreate":1620976066691,"gmtModify":1704351415117,"author":{"id":"3570426503709368","authorId":"3570426503709368","name":"CWei92","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/63c5dff1b0ab726006ec156ccbcb83c2","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570426503709368","authorIdStr":"3570426503709368"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"to the moon","listText":"to the moon","text":"to the moon","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/198577679","repostId":"1118744845","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1118744845","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Stock Market Quotes, Business News, Financial News, Trading Ideas, and Stock Research by Professionals","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Benzinga","id":"1052270027","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa"},"pubTimestamp":1620975733,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1118744845?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-05-14 15:02","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Nio Grabbed 23% Share Of China's All-Electric SUV Market In April, Ahead Of Tesla's 17%","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1118744845","media":"Benzinga","summary":"Nio Inc NIO 7.31% grabbed the largest market share in China’s all-electric SUV market in April, higher than its U.S.-based rivalTesla IncTSLA 3.09%, according to China Automotive Technology and Research Center data.What Happened: Nio grabbed a 23% electric SUV share in April, compared with Tesla’s 17%, CnEVPostreported— citing the CATRC data.Nioclockeda total of 7,404 SUV sales in April — with the ES6 model selling the most at 3,302 vehicles, EC6 sales were 2,484 units and ES8 sales at 1,618 uni","content":"<p><b>Nio Inc</b>&nbsp;NIO 7.31%&nbsp;grabbed the largest market share in China’s all-electric SUV market in April, higher than its U.S.-based rival<b>Tesla Inc</b>TSLA 3.09%, according to China Automotive Technology and Research Center data.</p>\n<p><b>What Happened:</b>&nbsp;Nio grabbed a 23% electric SUV share in April, compared with Tesla’s 17%, CnEVPostreported— citing the CATRC data.</p>\n<p>Nioclockeda total of 7,404 SUV sales in April — with the ES6 model selling the most at 3,302 vehicles, EC6 sales were 2,484 units and ES8 sales at 1,618 units, the report said.&nbsp;<b>Xpeng Inc</b>XPEV 4.87%made up for 7% of the all-electric SUV market in the month.</p>\n<p>The Elon Musk-led&nbsp;Tesla sold 5,520 Model Ys in April.</p>\n<p>Tesla’s April sales of 25,845 were down 27% from March, down more than the overall EV market which saw a smaller 12% month-on-month decline. Of these Tesla shipped out 11,671 units in the country, implying that most sales in April were exports,accordingto the Wall Street Journal.</p>\n<p><b>Why It Matters:</b>&nbsp;The sales numbers come at a time when automakers are facing semiconductor shortages. Nio has already warned the shortage could hit its second-quarter sales. Nio had to halt production at its Hefei manufacturing plant for five working days starting March 29.</p>\n<p>In addition, Tesla has been facingrough weather in China,a market that contributes nearly 30% of the electric vehicle maker's global sales and is its second-largest market after the United States.</p>\n<p><b>Price Action:</b>&nbsp;Nio shares closed 7.30% lower at $31.22 on Thursday, while Tesla shares closed 3.09% lower at $571.69.</p>\n<p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Nio Grabbed 23% Share Of China's All-Electric SUV Market In April, Ahead Of Tesla's 17%</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nNio Grabbed 23% Share Of China's All-Electric SUV Market In April, Ahead Of Tesla's 17%\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Benzinga </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-05-14 15:02</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><b>Nio Inc</b>&nbsp;NIO 7.31%&nbsp;grabbed the largest market share in China’s all-electric SUV market in April, higher than its U.S.-based rival<b>Tesla Inc</b>TSLA 3.09%, according to China Automotive Technology and Research Center data.</p>\n<p><b>What Happened:</b>&nbsp;Nio grabbed a 23% electric SUV share in April, compared with Tesla’s 17%, CnEVPostreported— citing the CATRC data.</p>\n<p>Nioclockeda total of 7,404 SUV sales in April — with the ES6 model selling the most at 3,302 vehicles, EC6 sales were 2,484 units and ES8 sales at 1,618 units, the report said.&nbsp;<b>Xpeng Inc</b>XPEV 4.87%made up for 7% of the all-electric SUV market in the month.</p>\n<p>The Elon Musk-led&nbsp;Tesla sold 5,520 Model Ys in April.</p>\n<p>Tesla’s April sales of 25,845 were down 27% from March, down more than the overall EV market which saw a smaller 12% month-on-month decline. Of these Tesla shipped out 11,671 units in the country, implying that most sales in April were exports,accordingto the Wall Street Journal.</p>\n<p><b>Why It Matters:</b>&nbsp;The sales numbers come at a time when automakers are facing semiconductor shortages. Nio has already warned the shortage could hit its second-quarter sales. Nio had to halt production at its Hefei manufacturing plant for five working days starting March 29.</p>\n<p>In addition, Tesla has been facingrough weather in China,a market that contributes nearly 30% of the electric vehicle maker's global sales and is its second-largest market after the United States.</p>\n<p><b>Price Action:</b>&nbsp;Nio shares closed 7.30% lower at $31.22 on Thursday, while Tesla shares closed 3.09% lower at $571.69.</p>\n<p></p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NIO":"蔚来"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1118744845","content_text":"Nio Inc NIO 7.31% grabbed the largest market share in China’s all-electric SUV market in April, higher than its U.S.-based rivalTesla IncTSLA 3.09%, according to China Automotive Technology and Research Center data.\nWhat Happened: Nio grabbed a 23% electric SUV share in April, compared with Tesla’s 17%, CnEVPostreported— citing the CATRC data.\nNioclockeda total of 7,404 SUV sales in April — with the ES6 model selling the most at 3,302 vehicles, EC6 sales were 2,484 units and ES8 sales at 1,618 units, the report said. Xpeng IncXPEV 4.87%made up for 7% of the all-electric SUV market in the month.\nThe Elon Musk-led Tesla sold 5,520 Model Ys in April.\nTesla’s April sales of 25,845 were down 27% from March, down more than the overall EV market which saw a smaller 12% month-on-month decline. Of these Tesla shipped out 11,671 units in the country, implying that most sales in April were exports,accordingto the Wall Street Journal.\nWhy It Matters: The sales numbers come at a time when automakers are facing semiconductor shortages. Nio has already warned the shortage could hit its second-quarter sales. Nio had to halt production at its Hefei manufacturing plant for five working days starting March 29.\nIn addition, Tesla has been facingrough weather in China,a market that contributes nearly 30% of the electric vehicle maker's global sales and is its second-largest market after the United States.\nPrice Action: Nio shares closed 7.30% lower at $31.22 on Thursday, while Tesla shares closed 3.09% lower at $571.69.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":620,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":199403859,"gmtCreate":1620723231571,"gmtModify":1704347327017,"author":{"id":"3570426503709368","authorId":"3570426503709368","name":"CWei92","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/63c5dff1b0ab726006ec156ccbcb83c2","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570426503709368","authorIdStr":"3570426503709368"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"like and comment","listText":"like and comment","text":"like and comment","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/199403859","repostId":"2134551566","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2134551566","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1620678383,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2134551566?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-05-11 04:26","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Wall Street closes lower as inflation fears prompt tech sell-off","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2134551566","media":"Reuters","summary":"* Electric vehicle shares drop after Workhorse miss. * Indexes down: Dow 0.10%, S&P 1.04%, Nasdaq 2.55%. NEW YORK, May 10  - Wall Street closed lower on Monday as inflation jitters drove investors away from market-leading growth stocks in favor of cyclicals, which stand to benefit most as the economy reopens.Industrial and healthcare shares limited the Dow's decline but the blue-chip average reversed course late in the session to snap a three-day streak of record closing highs.\"The market leader","content":"<p>* Electric vehicle shares drop after Workhorse miss</p><p>* Rising commodity prices fuel inflation concerns</p><p>* Tech-related stocks pull Nasdaq lower</p><p>* Indexes down: Dow 0.10%, S&amp;P 1.04%, Nasdaq 2.55%</p><p>NEW YORK, May 10 (Reuters) - Wall Street closed lower on Monday as inflation jitters drove investors away from market-leading growth stocks in favor of cyclicals, which stand to benefit most as the economy reopens.</p><p>Industrial and healthcare shares limited the Dow's decline but the blue-chip average reversed course late in the session to snap a three-day streak of record closing highs.</p><p>\"The market leadership is not doing all that well this year,\" said Paul Nolte, portfolio manager at Kingsview Asset Management in Chicago. \"There's been a general rotation away from growth to other parts of the market.\"</p><p>A demand resurgence is colliding with strained supply of basic materials, helping to fuel inflation worries.</p><p>\"Once the supply lines are rebuilt this will go away. But it's going to take some time,\" Nolte added. \"It's different from flipping on a light switch.\"</p><p>The break-even rate on five-year and 10-year U.S. Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TIPS\">$(TIPS)$</a> touched their highest levels since 2011 and 2013, respectively.</p><p>\"There's still some push and pull as to whether the market believes inflation is transitory or something that's going to stick around,\" Nolte said.</p><p>Inflation concerns will be in the minds of investors when the Labor Department releases its latest CPI report on Wednesday.</p><p>A shutdown to halt a ransomware attack on the Colonial Pipeline entered its fourth day, hobbling a network which transports nearly half of the East Coast's fuel supplies.</p><p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average&nbsp;fell 34.94 points, or 0.1%, to 34,742.82, the S&amp;P 500&nbsp;lost 44.17 points, or 1.04%, to 4,188.43 and the Nasdaq Composite&nbsp;dropped 350.38 points, or 2.55%, to 13,401.86.</p><p>Of the 11 major sectors in the S&amp;P 500, six closed red. Tech was the biggest loser, sliding 2.5%.</p><p>First-quarter reporting season has entered the home stretch, with 439 of the companies in the S&amp;P 500 having reported as of Friday. Of those, 87% have beaten consensus expectations, according to Refinitiv IBES.</p><p>Analysts now see year-on-year S&amp;P earnings growth of 50.4% on aggregate, more than double the rate forecast at the beginning of April and significantly better than the 16% first-quarter growth expected on January 1, per Refinitiv</p><p>Hotel operator Marriott International Inc&nbsp;missed quarterly profit and revenue expectations due to weak U.S. bookings which offset a rebound in China. Its shares fell 4.1%.</p><p>After the bell, its rival Wynn Resorts Ltd&nbsp;missed quarterly earnings and revenue estimates. Its shares were up in after-hours trading.</p><p>Electric vehicle stocks put on the brakes, with Tesla Inc&nbsp;down 6.4% and Fisker&nbsp;off 9.0% after Workhorse Group    missed quarterly revenue expectations. Workhorse lost 14.9% on the day.</p><p>FireEye&nbsp;rose 1.2% after industry sources identified the cybersecurity firm as among those helping Colonial Pipeline recover from the recent cyberattack.</p><p>Declining issues outnumbered advancing ones on the NYSE by a 1.88-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 3.24-to-1 ratio favored decliners.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 posted 223 new 52-week highs and no new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 208 new highs and 148 new lows.</p><p>Volume on U.S. exchanges was 10.97 billion shares, compared with the 10.20 billion average over the last 20 trading days.</p><p><b>Here are</b>&nbsp;<b>company's financial statements</b></p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/NW/2134656364\" target=\"_blank\">Occidental Petroleum loss narrows as crude prices rebound</a></p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/NW/2134406655\" target=\"_blank\">Affirm beats on revenue, sees early recovery in travel spending</a></p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/NW/2134439656\" target=\"_blank\">Yalla Group Ltd QTRLY Earnings Per Share $0.11 From Continued Operations</a></p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/NW/2134564536\" target=\"_blank\">TuSimple Holdings EPS beats by $0.01, misses on revenue</a></p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/NW/2134659571\" target=\"_blank\">Novavax Reports Q1 Loss, Tops Revenue Estimates</a></p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/NW/2134995659\" target=\"_blank\">3D Systems Surpasses Q1 Earnings and Revenue Estimates</a></p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/NW/1145839299\" target=\"_blank\">Virgin Galactic shares fall after another quarterly loss, no date set for next spaceflight test</a></p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/NW/1169419141\" target=\"_blank\">Roblox revenue grows 140% in first earnings report since company went public</a></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Wall Street closes lower as inflation fears prompt tech sell-off</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWall Street closes lower as inflation fears prompt tech sell-off\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-05-11 04:26</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>* Electric vehicle shares drop after Workhorse miss</p><p>* Rising commodity prices fuel inflation concerns</p><p>* Tech-related stocks pull Nasdaq lower</p><p>* Indexes down: Dow 0.10%, S&amp;P 1.04%, Nasdaq 2.55%</p><p>NEW YORK, May 10 (Reuters) - Wall Street closed lower on Monday as inflation jitters drove investors away from market-leading growth stocks in favor of cyclicals, which stand to benefit most as the economy reopens.</p><p>Industrial and healthcare shares limited the Dow's decline but the blue-chip average reversed course late in the session to snap a three-day streak of record closing highs.</p><p>\"The market leadership is not doing all that well this year,\" said Paul Nolte, portfolio manager at Kingsview Asset Management in Chicago. \"There's been a general rotation away from growth to other parts of the market.\"</p><p>A demand resurgence is colliding with strained supply of basic materials, helping to fuel inflation worries.</p><p>\"Once the supply lines are rebuilt this will go away. But it's going to take some time,\" Nolte added. \"It's different from flipping on a light switch.\"</p><p>The break-even rate on five-year and 10-year U.S. Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TIPS\">$(TIPS)$</a> touched their highest levels since 2011 and 2013, respectively.</p><p>\"There's still some push and pull as to whether the market believes inflation is transitory or something that's going to stick around,\" Nolte said.</p><p>Inflation concerns will be in the minds of investors when the Labor Department releases its latest CPI report on Wednesday.</p><p>A shutdown to halt a ransomware attack on the Colonial Pipeline entered its fourth day, hobbling a network which transports nearly half of the East Coast's fuel supplies.</p><p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average&nbsp;fell 34.94 points, or 0.1%, to 34,742.82, the S&amp;P 500&nbsp;lost 44.17 points, or 1.04%, to 4,188.43 and the Nasdaq Composite&nbsp;dropped 350.38 points, or 2.55%, to 13,401.86.</p><p>Of the 11 major sectors in the S&amp;P 500, six closed red. Tech was the biggest loser, sliding 2.5%.</p><p>First-quarter reporting season has entered the home stretch, with 439 of the companies in the S&amp;P 500 having reported as of Friday. Of those, 87% have beaten consensus expectations, according to Refinitiv IBES.</p><p>Analysts now see year-on-year S&amp;P earnings growth of 50.4% on aggregate, more than double the rate forecast at the beginning of April and significantly better than the 16% first-quarter growth expected on January 1, per Refinitiv</p><p>Hotel operator Marriott International Inc&nbsp;missed quarterly profit and revenue expectations due to weak U.S. bookings which offset a rebound in China. Its shares fell 4.1%.</p><p>After the bell, its rival Wynn Resorts Ltd&nbsp;missed quarterly earnings and revenue estimates. Its shares were up in after-hours trading.</p><p>Electric vehicle stocks put on the brakes, with Tesla Inc&nbsp;down 6.4% and Fisker&nbsp;off 9.0% after Workhorse Group    missed quarterly revenue expectations. Workhorse lost 14.9% on the day.</p><p>FireEye&nbsp;rose 1.2% after industry sources identified the cybersecurity firm as among those helping Colonial Pipeline recover from the recent cyberattack.</p><p>Declining issues outnumbered advancing ones on the NYSE by a 1.88-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 3.24-to-1 ratio favored decliners.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 posted 223 new 52-week highs and no new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 208 new highs and 148 new lows.</p><p>Volume on U.S. exchanges was 10.97 billion shares, compared with the 10.20 billion average over the last 20 trading days.</p><p><b>Here are</b>&nbsp;<b>company's financial statements</b></p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/NW/2134656364\" target=\"_blank\">Occidental Petroleum loss narrows as crude prices rebound</a></p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/NW/2134406655\" target=\"_blank\">Affirm beats on revenue, sees early recovery in travel spending</a></p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/NW/2134439656\" target=\"_blank\">Yalla Group Ltd QTRLY Earnings Per Share $0.11 From Continued Operations</a></p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/NW/2134564536\" target=\"_blank\">TuSimple Holdings EPS beats by $0.01, misses on revenue</a></p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/NW/2134659571\" target=\"_blank\">Novavax Reports Q1 Loss, Tops Revenue Estimates</a></p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/NW/2134995659\" target=\"_blank\">3D Systems Surpasses Q1 Earnings and Revenue Estimates</a></p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/NW/1145839299\" target=\"_blank\">Virgin Galactic shares fall after another quarterly loss, no date set for next spaceflight test</a></p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/NW/1169419141\" target=\"_blank\">Roblox revenue grows 140% in first earnings report since company went public</a></p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2134551566","content_text":"* Electric vehicle shares drop after Workhorse miss* Rising commodity prices fuel inflation concerns* Tech-related stocks pull Nasdaq lower* Indexes down: Dow 0.10%, S&P 1.04%, Nasdaq 2.55%NEW YORK, May 10 (Reuters) - Wall Street closed lower on Monday as inflation jitters drove investors away from market-leading growth stocks in favor of cyclicals, which stand to benefit most as the economy reopens.Industrial and healthcare shares limited the Dow's decline but the blue-chip average reversed course late in the session to snap a three-day streak of record closing highs.\"The market leadership is not doing all that well this year,\" said Paul Nolte, portfolio manager at Kingsview Asset Management in Chicago. \"There's been a general rotation away from growth to other parts of the market.\"A demand resurgence is colliding with strained supply of basic materials, helping to fuel inflation worries.\"Once the supply lines are rebuilt this will go away. But it's going to take some time,\" Nolte added. \"It's different from flipping on a light switch.\"The break-even rate on five-year and 10-year U.S. Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities $(TIPS)$ touched their highest levels since 2011 and 2013, respectively.\"There's still some push and pull as to whether the market believes inflation is transitory or something that's going to stick around,\" Nolte said.Inflation concerns will be in the minds of investors when the Labor Department releases its latest CPI report on Wednesday.A shutdown to halt a ransomware attack on the Colonial Pipeline entered its fourth day, hobbling a network which transports nearly half of the East Coast's fuel supplies.The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 34.94 points, or 0.1%, to 34,742.82, the S&P 500 lost 44.17 points, or 1.04%, to 4,188.43 and the Nasdaq Composite dropped 350.38 points, or 2.55%, to 13,401.86.Of the 11 major sectors in the S&P 500, six closed red. Tech was the biggest loser, sliding 2.5%.First-quarter reporting season has entered the home stretch, with 439 of the companies in the S&P 500 having reported as of Friday. Of those, 87% have beaten consensus expectations, according to Refinitiv IBES.Analysts now see year-on-year S&P earnings growth of 50.4% on aggregate, more than double the rate forecast at the beginning of April and significantly better than the 16% first-quarter growth expected on January 1, per RefinitivHotel operator Marriott International Inc missed quarterly profit and revenue expectations due to weak U.S. bookings which offset a rebound in China. Its shares fell 4.1%.After the bell, its rival Wynn Resorts Ltd missed quarterly earnings and revenue estimates. Its shares were up in after-hours trading.Electric vehicle stocks put on the brakes, with Tesla Inc down 6.4% and Fisker off 9.0% after Workhorse Group    missed quarterly revenue expectations. Workhorse lost 14.9% on the day.FireEye rose 1.2% after industry sources identified the cybersecurity firm as among those helping Colonial Pipeline recover from the recent cyberattack.Declining issues outnumbered advancing ones on the NYSE by a 1.88-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 3.24-to-1 ratio favored decliners.The S&P 500 posted 223 new 52-week highs and no new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 208 new highs and 148 new lows.Volume on U.S. exchanges was 10.97 billion shares, compared with the 10.20 billion average over the last 20 trading days.Here are company's financial statementsOccidental Petroleum loss narrows as crude prices reboundAffirm beats on revenue, sees early recovery in travel spendingYalla Group Ltd QTRLY Earnings Per Share $0.11 From Continued OperationsTuSimple Holdings EPS beats by $0.01, misses on revenueNovavax Reports Q1 Loss, Tops Revenue Estimates3D Systems Surpasses Q1 Earnings and Revenue EstimatesVirgin Galactic shares fall after another quarterly loss, no date set for next spaceflight testRoblox revenue grows 140% in first earnings report since company went public","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":417,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":190552867,"gmtCreate":1620637248659,"gmtModify":1704345912752,"author":{"id":"3570426503709368","authorId":"3570426503709368","name":"CWei92","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/63c5dff1b0ab726006ec156ccbcb83c2","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570426503709368","authorIdStr":"3570426503709368"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"like and comment","listText":"like and comment","text":"like and comment","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/190552867","repostId":"1120120226","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1120120226","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1620623863,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1120120226?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-05-10 13:17","market":"us","language":"en","title":"US government declares emergency after cyberattack on major pipeline","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1120120226","media":"AFP","summary":"The US government declared a regional emergency Sunday as the largest fuel pipeline system in the Un","content":"<p>The US government declared a regional emergency Sunday as the largest fuel pipeline system in the United States remained largely shut down, two days after a major ransomware attack was detected.</p><p>The Colonial Pipeline Company ships gasoline and jet fuel from the Gulf Coast of Texas to the populousEast Coastthrough 5,500 miles (8,850 kilometres) of pipeline, serving 50 million consumers.</p><p>The company said it was the victim of acybersecurity attackinvolving ransomware -- attacks that encrypt computer systems and seek to extract payments from operators.</p><p>\"This Declaration addresses the emergency conditions creating a need for immediate transportation of gasoline, diesel, jet fuel, and other refined petroleum products and provides necessary relief,\" the Department of Transportation said in a statement.</p><p>The emergency declaration allows for fuel to be transported by road to the affected states: Alabama, Arkansas, District of Columbia, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, New Jersey,New York, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas and Virginia.</p><p>The declaration also provides regulatory relief to commercial motor vehicle operations that are part of the emergency support efforts.</p><p>Colonial said earlier Sunday that it had opened some smaller delivery lines, but the main system was not yet back up and running.</p><p>\"While our mainlines remain offline, some smaller lateral lines between terminals and delivery points are now operational,\" Colonial said in a statement, adding it would \"bring our full system back online only when we believe it is safe to do so.\"</p><p>\"We have remained in contact with law enforcement and other federal agencies, including the Department of Energy who is leading the Federal Government response,\" it added.</p><p>\"Maintaining the operational security of our pipeline, in addition to safely bringing our systems back online, remain our highest priorities.\"</p><p><b>Calls for improved oversight</b></p><p>Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo told CBS on Sunday that authorities were working to prevent any disruption to supplies.</p><p>Colonial, based in the southern state of Georgia, is the largest pipeline operator in the United States by volume, normally transporting 2.5 million barrels of gasoline, diesel fuel, jet fuel and other refined petroleum products per day.</p><p>The attack prompted calls from cybersecurity experts for improved oversight of the industry to prepare for future threats.</p><p>\"This attack is unusual for the US. But the bottom line is that attacks targeting operational technology -- the industrial control systems on the production line or plant floor -- are becoming more frequent,\" Algirde Pipikaite, cyber strategy lead at the World Economic Forum's Centre for Cybersecurity, told AFP on Saturday.</p><p>\"Unless cybersecurity measures are embedded in a technology's development phase, we are likely to see more frequent attacks on industrial systems like oil and gas pipelines or water treatment plants.\"</p><p>Gas prices jumped in the United States on Sunday following the ransomware attack. Analysts warn that prices could climb even higher if the pipeline is not reopened soon. Oil prices rose more than one percent Monday.</p><p>The United States was rocked in recent months by news of two major cybersecurity breaches -- the SolarWinds hack that compromised thousands of US government and private sector computer networks and was officially blamed on Russia; and a potentially devastating penetration of Microsoft email servers.</p>","source":"lsy1620623854247","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>US government declares emergency after cyberattack on major pipeline</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nUS government declares emergency after cyberattack on major pipeline\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-05-10 13:17 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.france24.com/en/americas/20210510-biden-declares-state-of-emergency-after-major-us-pipeline-shut-due-to-cyber-attack><strong>AFP</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The US government declared a regional emergency Sunday as the largest fuel pipeline system in the United States remained largely shut down, two days after a major ransomware attack was detected.The ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.france24.com/en/americas/20210510-biden-declares-state-of-emergency-after-major-us-pipeline-shut-due-to-cyber-attack\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.france24.com/en/americas/20210510-biden-declares-state-of-emergency-after-major-us-pipeline-shut-due-to-cyber-attack","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1120120226","content_text":"The US government declared a regional emergency Sunday as the largest fuel pipeline system in the United States remained largely shut down, two days after a major ransomware attack was detected.The Colonial Pipeline Company ships gasoline and jet fuel from the Gulf Coast of Texas to the populousEast Coastthrough 5,500 miles (8,850 kilometres) of pipeline, serving 50 million consumers.The company said it was the victim of acybersecurity attackinvolving ransomware -- attacks that encrypt computer systems and seek to extract payments from operators.\"This Declaration addresses the emergency conditions creating a need for immediate transportation of gasoline, diesel, jet fuel, and other refined petroleum products and provides necessary relief,\" the Department of Transportation said in a statement.The emergency declaration allows for fuel to be transported by road to the affected states: Alabama, Arkansas, District of Columbia, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, New Jersey,New York, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas and Virginia.The declaration also provides regulatory relief to commercial motor vehicle operations that are part of the emergency support efforts.Colonial said earlier Sunday that it had opened some smaller delivery lines, but the main system was not yet back up and running.\"While our mainlines remain offline, some smaller lateral lines between terminals and delivery points are now operational,\" Colonial said in a statement, adding it would \"bring our full system back online only when we believe it is safe to do so.\"\"We have remained in contact with law enforcement and other federal agencies, including the Department of Energy who is leading the Federal Government response,\" it added.\"Maintaining the operational security of our pipeline, in addition to safely bringing our systems back online, remain our highest priorities.\"Calls for improved oversightCommerce Secretary Gina Raimondo told CBS on Sunday that authorities were working to prevent any disruption to supplies.Colonial, based in the southern state of Georgia, is the largest pipeline operator in the United States by volume, normally transporting 2.5 million barrels of gasoline, diesel fuel, jet fuel and other refined petroleum products per day.The attack prompted calls from cybersecurity experts for improved oversight of the industry to prepare for future threats.\"This attack is unusual for the US. But the bottom line is that attacks targeting operational technology -- the industrial control systems on the production line or plant floor -- are becoming more frequent,\" Algirde Pipikaite, cyber strategy lead at the World Economic Forum's Centre for Cybersecurity, told AFP on Saturday.\"Unless cybersecurity measures are embedded in a technology's development phase, we are likely to see more frequent attacks on industrial systems like oil and gas pipelines or water treatment plants.\"Gas prices jumped in the United States on Sunday following the ransomware attack. Analysts warn that prices could climb even higher if the pipeline is not reopened soon. Oil prices rose more than one percent Monday.The United States was rocked in recent months by news of two major cybersecurity breaches -- the SolarWinds hack that compromised thousands of US government and private sector computer networks and was officially blamed on Russia; and a potentially devastating penetration of Microsoft email servers.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":160,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":190552135,"gmtCreate":1620637228227,"gmtModify":1704345912430,"author":{"id":"3570426503709368","authorId":"3570426503709368","name":"CWei92","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/63c5dff1b0ab726006ec156ccbcb83c2","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570426503709368","authorIdStr":"3570426503709368"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"please like and comment","listText":"please like and comment","text":"please like and comment","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/190552135","repostId":"2134263864","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2134263864","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1620633000,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2134263864?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-05-10 15:50","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Panasonic forecasts profit 28% profit jump on economic rebound","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2134263864","media":"StreetInsider","summary":"TOKYO (Reuters) -     Panasonic Corp expects operating profit to jump by a almost a third this busin","content":"<p>TOKYO (Reuters) -     Panasonic Corp expects operating profit to jump by a almost a third this business year as economies worldwide rebound from coronavirus lockdown slumps, the company said on Monday.</p><p>Panasonic forecast operating profit to rise 27.6% to 330 billion yen ($3 billion) this business year. The figure is slightly higher than an average forecast of 327.56 billion  based on estimates from 16 analysts, Refinitiv data shows.</p><p>The Japanese maker of items from bicycles to hair dryers is looking to tap growing demand for electric car batteries through its decade-old partnership with Tesla Inc and is investing heavily in supply chain management services.</p><p>This business year, Panasonic plans to begin a test line in Japan to make 4,680 battery cells, a source earlier told Reuters. Tesla says such a format will halve battery costs and help ramp up battery production 100-fold by 2030.</p><p>The Japanese company is also investing heavily in new production chain management services as companies strengthen supply chains in the wake of pandemic disruptions.</p><p>Last month Panasonic Corp said it would acquire the share of U.S. supply-chain software company Blue Yonder that it does not already own, in a $7.1 billion deal, its biggest in a decade.</p><p>The U.S. company uses machine learning to help firms manage supply chains linking factories to warehouses and retailers.</p><p>For the quarter that ended March 31, the Japanese industrial conglomerate posted a fourth-quarter operating profit of 31.8 billion yen ($292.09 million), down 40% from a year ago as weaker earnings from its life solutions unit, which sells lighting, equipment and materials for buildings offset rising income from automotive components.</p><p>That result was better than an estimated average profit of 20.99 billion yen from five analysts surveyed by Refinitiv.</p>","source":"highlight_streetinsider","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Panasonic forecasts profit 28% profit jump on economic rebound</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nPanasonic forecasts profit 28% profit jump on economic rebound\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-05-10 15:50 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.streetinsider.com/dr/news.php?id=18389111><strong>StreetInsider</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>TOKYO (Reuters) -     Panasonic Corp expects operating profit to jump by a almost a third this business year as economies worldwide rebound from coronavirus lockdown slumps, the company said on Monday...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.streetinsider.com/dr/news.php?id=18389111\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"PCRFY":"松下"},"source_url":"https://www.streetinsider.com/dr/news.php?id=18389111","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2134263864","content_text":"TOKYO (Reuters) -     Panasonic Corp expects operating profit to jump by a almost a third this business year as economies worldwide rebound from coronavirus lockdown slumps, the company said on Monday.Panasonic forecast operating profit to rise 27.6% to 330 billion yen ($3 billion) this business year. The figure is slightly higher than an average forecast of 327.56 billion  based on estimates from 16 analysts, Refinitiv data shows.The Japanese maker of items from bicycles to hair dryers is looking to tap growing demand for electric car batteries through its decade-old partnership with Tesla Inc and is investing heavily in supply chain management services.This business year, Panasonic plans to begin a test line in Japan to make 4,680 battery cells, a source earlier told Reuters. Tesla says such a format will halve battery costs and help ramp up battery production 100-fold by 2030.The Japanese company is also investing heavily in new production chain management services as companies strengthen supply chains in the wake of pandemic disruptions.Last month Panasonic Corp said it would acquire the share of U.S. supply-chain software company Blue Yonder that it does not already own, in a $7.1 billion deal, its biggest in a decade.The U.S. company uses machine learning to help firms manage supply chains linking factories to warehouses and retailers.For the quarter that ended March 31, the Japanese industrial conglomerate posted a fourth-quarter operating profit of 31.8 billion yen ($292.09 million), down 40% from a year ago as weaker earnings from its life solutions unit, which sells lighting, equipment and materials for buildings offset rising income from automotive components.That result was better than an estimated average profit of 20.99 billion yen from five analysts surveyed by Refinitiv.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":367,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":105167030,"gmtCreate":1620279511720,"gmtModify":1704341272894,"author":{"id":"3570426503709368","authorId":"3570426503709368","name":"CWei92","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/63c5dff1b0ab726006ec156ccbcb83c2","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570426503709368","authorIdStr":"3570426503709368"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"like and comment","listText":"like and comment","text":"like and comment","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/105167030","repostId":"2133652936","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2133652936","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1620244873,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2133652936?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-05-06 04:01","market":"hk","language":"en","title":"Dow ends at record high，Nasdaq falls as tech slides","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2133652936","media":"Reuters","summary":"May 5 (Reuters) - The Dow Jones Industrial Average ended at a record high on Wednesday, while Nasdaq","content":"<p>May 5 (Reuters) - The Dow Jones Industrial Average ended at a record high on Wednesday, while Nasdaq gave up its earlier gains and closed in red.</p><p>Energy and materials continued this week's momentum, leading gains among S&amp;P 500 sectors. Defensive utilities and real estate led sectoral declines.</p><p>\"Energy, financial, materials, industrials are all outperforming. They tend to be cyclically oriented sectors and tend to benefit during periods when the economies are reopening and expanding,\" said Terry Sandven, chief equity strategist at U.S. Bank Wealth Management.</p><p>The Philadelphia SE Semiconductor index recovered from a sell-off on Tuesday. Megacap technology companies including Amazon.com Inc and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FB\">Facebook</a> Inc and Alphabet Inc were down.</p><p>Strong economic data and earnings pushed the S&amp;P 500 and Nasdaq indexes to record high last week, but markets have wobbled amid concerns about rising inflation and potentially higher U.S. interest rates.</p><p>\"Once you have markets hitting the highs we have seen recently, the <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE\">one</a> thing investors are worried about is rising inflation and what that means for profitability of companies,\" said Shawn Cruz, senior market strategist at TD Ameritrade.</p><p>Tech sell-off accelerated on Tuesday after Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen suggested that interest rates might need to rise in an overheating economy.</p><p>She later clarified that a near-term interest rate hike was not something she was \"predicting or recommending\" on Tuesday evening.</p><p>The ADP National Employment Report showed U.S. private payrolls increased in April as companies rushed to boost production amid a surge in demand, powered by massive government aid and rising vaccinations against COVID-19.</p><p>A more comprehensive reading in the form of the Labor Department's non-farm payrolls data is due on Friday.</p><p>Unofficially, the Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 96.99 points, or 0.28%, to 34,230.02, the S&amp;P 500 gained 2.97 points, or 0.07%, to 4,167.63 and the Nasdaq Composite dropped 51.08 points, or 0.37%, to 13,582.43.</p><p>Peloton Interactive Inc hit a seven-month low on its announcement to recall its treadmills amid reports of multiple injuries and the death of a child in an accident.</p><p>Boeing Co fell after U.S. air safety officials asked it to supply fresh analysis and documentation showing 737 MAX subsystems would not be affected by electrical grounding issues.</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TMUSR\">T-Mobile US Inc</a> jumped as it raised its full-year postpaid subscriber net additions forecast.</p><p>Uber Technologies Inc is set to report earnings after markets close on Wednesday.</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/NW/1108837445\" target=\"_blank\">Uber losses dramatically improve thanks to sale of self-driving unit</a></p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/NW/1190727792\" target=\"_blank\">PayPal CEO touts ‘next generation digital wallet’ after earnings beat</a></p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/NW/1185637253\" target=\"_blank\">Twilio Surpasses Q1 Earnings and Revenue Estimates</a></p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/NW/1118316842\" target=\"_blank\">The Allstate Corp Q1 adjusted earnings of $6.11 per share</a></p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/NW/1144806506\" target=\"_blank\">Etsy slides more than 10% after it warns of slowing growth</a></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Dow ends at record high，Nasdaq falls as tech slides</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nDow ends at record high，Nasdaq falls as tech slides\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-05-06 04:01 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.reuters.com/business/dow-ends-record-high-nasdaq-falls-tech-slides-2021-05-05/><strong>Reuters</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>May 5 (Reuters) - The Dow Jones Industrial Average ended at a record high on Wednesday, while Nasdaq gave up its earlier gains and closed in red.Energy and materials continued this week's momentum, ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.reuters.com/business/dow-ends-record-high-nasdaq-falls-tech-slides-2021-05-05/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"161125":"标普500","513500":"标普500ETF","LHDX":"Lucira Health, Inc.","SH":"标普500反向ETF","APR":"Apria, Inc.","IVV":"标普500指数ETF","SANA":"Sana Biotechnology, Inc.","OEF":"标普100指数ETF-iShares","UPRO":"三倍做多标普500ETF","SSO":"两倍做多标普500ETF","CGEM":"Cullinan Therapeutics","LABP":"Landos Biopharma, Inc.","SPXU":"三倍做空标普500ETF","03086":"华夏纳指","BA":"波音","SDS":"两倍做空标普500ETF","OEX":"标普100",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","COMP":"Compass, Inc.","09086":"华夏纳指-U","QNETCN":"纳斯达克中美互联网老虎指数"},"source_url":"https://www.reuters.com/business/dow-ends-record-high-nasdaq-falls-tech-slides-2021-05-05/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2133652936","content_text":"May 5 (Reuters) - The Dow Jones Industrial Average ended at a record high on Wednesday, while Nasdaq gave up its earlier gains and closed in red.Energy and materials continued this week's momentum, leading gains among S&P 500 sectors. Defensive utilities and real estate led sectoral declines.\"Energy, financial, materials, industrials are all outperforming. They tend to be cyclically oriented sectors and tend to benefit during periods when the economies are reopening and expanding,\" said Terry Sandven, chief equity strategist at U.S. Bank Wealth Management.The Philadelphia SE Semiconductor index recovered from a sell-off on Tuesday. Megacap technology companies including Amazon.com Inc and Facebook Inc and Alphabet Inc were down.Strong economic data and earnings pushed the S&P 500 and Nasdaq indexes to record high last week, but markets have wobbled amid concerns about rising inflation and potentially higher U.S. interest rates.\"Once you have markets hitting the highs we have seen recently, the one thing investors are worried about is rising inflation and what that means for profitability of companies,\" said Shawn Cruz, senior market strategist at TD Ameritrade.Tech sell-off accelerated on Tuesday after Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen suggested that interest rates might need to rise in an overheating economy.She later clarified that a near-term interest rate hike was not something she was \"predicting or recommending\" on Tuesday evening.The ADP National Employment Report showed U.S. private payrolls increased in April as companies rushed to boost production amid a surge in demand, powered by massive government aid and rising vaccinations against COVID-19.A more comprehensive reading in the form of the Labor Department's non-farm payrolls data is due on Friday.Unofficially, the Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 96.99 points, or 0.28%, to 34,230.02, the S&P 500 gained 2.97 points, or 0.07%, to 4,167.63 and the Nasdaq Composite dropped 51.08 points, or 0.37%, to 13,582.43.Peloton Interactive Inc hit a seven-month low on its announcement to recall its treadmills amid reports of multiple injuries and the death of a child in an accident.Boeing Co fell after U.S. air safety officials asked it to supply fresh analysis and documentation showing 737 MAX subsystems would not be affected by electrical grounding issues.T-Mobile US Inc jumped as it raised its full-year postpaid subscriber net additions forecast.Uber Technologies Inc is set to report earnings after markets close on Wednesday.Uber losses dramatically improve thanks to sale of self-driving unitPayPal CEO touts ‘next generation digital wallet’ after earnings beatTwilio Surpasses Q1 Earnings and Revenue EstimatesThe Allstate Corp Q1 adjusted earnings of $6.11 per shareEtsy slides more than 10% after it warns of slowing growth","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":309,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":372921629,"gmtCreate":1619169619261,"gmtModify":1704720715177,"author":{"id":"3570426503709368","authorId":"3570426503709368","name":"CWei92","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/63c5dff1b0ab726006ec156ccbcb83c2","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570426503709368","authorIdStr":"3570426503709368"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"how is today marjet","listText":"how is today marjet","text":"how is today marjet","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/372921629","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":307,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":190552867,"gmtCreate":1620637248659,"gmtModify":1704345912752,"author":{"id":"3570426503709368","authorId":"3570426503709368","name":"CWei92","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/63c5dff1b0ab726006ec156ccbcb83c2","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570426503709368","authorIdStr":"3570426503709368"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"like and comment","listText":"like and comment","text":"like and comment","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/190552867","repostId":"1120120226","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1120120226","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1620623863,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1120120226?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-05-10 13:17","market":"us","language":"en","title":"US government declares emergency after cyberattack on major pipeline","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1120120226","media":"AFP","summary":"The US government declared a regional emergency Sunday as the largest fuel pipeline system in the Un","content":"<p>The US government declared a regional emergency Sunday as the largest fuel pipeline system in the United States remained largely shut down, two days after a major ransomware attack was detected.</p><p>The Colonial Pipeline Company ships gasoline and jet fuel from the Gulf Coast of Texas to the populousEast Coastthrough 5,500 miles (8,850 kilometres) of pipeline, serving 50 million consumers.</p><p>The company said it was the victim of acybersecurity attackinvolving ransomware -- attacks that encrypt computer systems and seek to extract payments from operators.</p><p>\"This Declaration addresses the emergency conditions creating a need for immediate transportation of gasoline, diesel, jet fuel, and other refined petroleum products and provides necessary relief,\" the Department of Transportation said in a statement.</p><p>The emergency declaration allows for fuel to be transported by road to the affected states: Alabama, Arkansas, District of Columbia, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, New Jersey,New York, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas and Virginia.</p><p>The declaration also provides regulatory relief to commercial motor vehicle operations that are part of the emergency support efforts.</p><p>Colonial said earlier Sunday that it had opened some smaller delivery lines, but the main system was not yet back up and running.</p><p>\"While our mainlines remain offline, some smaller lateral lines between terminals and delivery points are now operational,\" Colonial said in a statement, adding it would \"bring our full system back online only when we believe it is safe to do so.\"</p><p>\"We have remained in contact with law enforcement and other federal agencies, including the Department of Energy who is leading the Federal Government response,\" it added.</p><p>\"Maintaining the operational security of our pipeline, in addition to safely bringing our systems back online, remain our highest priorities.\"</p><p><b>Calls for improved oversight</b></p><p>Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo told CBS on Sunday that authorities were working to prevent any disruption to supplies.</p><p>Colonial, based in the southern state of Georgia, is the largest pipeline operator in the United States by volume, normally transporting 2.5 million barrels of gasoline, diesel fuel, jet fuel and other refined petroleum products per day.</p><p>The attack prompted calls from cybersecurity experts for improved oversight of the industry to prepare for future threats.</p><p>\"This attack is unusual for the US. But the bottom line is that attacks targeting operational technology -- the industrial control systems on the production line or plant floor -- are becoming more frequent,\" Algirde Pipikaite, cyber strategy lead at the World Economic Forum's Centre for Cybersecurity, told AFP on Saturday.</p><p>\"Unless cybersecurity measures are embedded in a technology's development phase, we are likely to see more frequent attacks on industrial systems like oil and gas pipelines or water treatment plants.\"</p><p>Gas prices jumped in the United States on Sunday following the ransomware attack. Analysts warn that prices could climb even higher if the pipeline is not reopened soon. Oil prices rose more than one percent Monday.</p><p>The United States was rocked in recent months by news of two major cybersecurity breaches -- the SolarWinds hack that compromised thousands of US government and private sector computer networks and was officially blamed on Russia; and a potentially devastating penetration of Microsoft email servers.</p>","source":"lsy1620623854247","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>US government declares emergency after cyberattack on major pipeline</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nUS government declares emergency after cyberattack on major pipeline\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-05-10 13:17 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.france24.com/en/americas/20210510-biden-declares-state-of-emergency-after-major-us-pipeline-shut-due-to-cyber-attack><strong>AFP</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The US government declared a regional emergency Sunday as the largest fuel pipeline system in the United States remained largely shut down, two days after a major ransomware attack was detected.The ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.france24.com/en/americas/20210510-biden-declares-state-of-emergency-after-major-us-pipeline-shut-due-to-cyber-attack\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.france24.com/en/americas/20210510-biden-declares-state-of-emergency-after-major-us-pipeline-shut-due-to-cyber-attack","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1120120226","content_text":"The US government declared a regional emergency Sunday as the largest fuel pipeline system in the United States remained largely shut down, two days after a major ransomware attack was detected.The Colonial Pipeline Company ships gasoline and jet fuel from the Gulf Coast of Texas to the populousEast Coastthrough 5,500 miles (8,850 kilometres) of pipeline, serving 50 million consumers.The company said it was the victim of acybersecurity attackinvolving ransomware -- attacks that encrypt computer systems and seek to extract payments from operators.\"This Declaration addresses the emergency conditions creating a need for immediate transportation of gasoline, diesel, jet fuel, and other refined petroleum products and provides necessary relief,\" the Department of Transportation said in a statement.The emergency declaration allows for fuel to be transported by road to the affected states: Alabama, Arkansas, District of Columbia, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, New Jersey,New York, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas and Virginia.The declaration also provides regulatory relief to commercial motor vehicle operations that are part of the emergency support efforts.Colonial said earlier Sunday that it had opened some smaller delivery lines, but the main system was not yet back up and running.\"While our mainlines remain offline, some smaller lateral lines between terminals and delivery points are now operational,\" Colonial said in a statement, adding it would \"bring our full system back online only when we believe it is safe to do so.\"\"We have remained in contact with law enforcement and other federal agencies, including the Department of Energy who is leading the Federal Government response,\" it added.\"Maintaining the operational security of our pipeline, in addition to safely bringing our systems back online, remain our highest priorities.\"Calls for improved oversightCommerce Secretary Gina Raimondo told CBS on Sunday that authorities were working to prevent any disruption to supplies.Colonial, based in the southern state of Georgia, is the largest pipeline operator in the United States by volume, normally transporting 2.5 million barrels of gasoline, diesel fuel, jet fuel and other refined petroleum products per day.The attack prompted calls from cybersecurity experts for improved oversight of the industry to prepare for future threats.\"This attack is unusual for the US. But the bottom line is that attacks targeting operational technology -- the industrial control systems on the production line or plant floor -- are becoming more frequent,\" Algirde Pipikaite, cyber strategy lead at the World Economic Forum's Centre for Cybersecurity, told AFP on Saturday.\"Unless cybersecurity measures are embedded in a technology's development phase, we are likely to see more frequent attacks on industrial systems like oil and gas pipelines or water treatment plants.\"Gas prices jumped in the United States on Sunday following the ransomware attack. Analysts warn that prices could climb even higher if the pipeline is not reopened soon. Oil prices rose more than one percent Monday.The United States was rocked in recent months by news of two major cybersecurity breaches -- the SolarWinds hack that compromised thousands of US government and private sector computer networks and was officially blamed on Russia; and a potentially devastating penetration of Microsoft email servers.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":160,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":199403859,"gmtCreate":1620723231571,"gmtModify":1704347327017,"author":{"id":"3570426503709368","authorId":"3570426503709368","name":"CWei92","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/63c5dff1b0ab726006ec156ccbcb83c2","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570426503709368","authorIdStr":"3570426503709368"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"like and comment","listText":"like and comment","text":"like and comment","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/199403859","repostId":"2134551566","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2134551566","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1620678383,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2134551566?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-05-11 04:26","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Wall Street closes lower as inflation fears prompt tech sell-off","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2134551566","media":"Reuters","summary":"* Electric vehicle shares drop after Workhorse miss. * Indexes down: Dow 0.10%, S&P 1.04%, Nasdaq 2.55%. NEW YORK, May 10  - Wall Street closed lower on Monday as inflation jitters drove investors away from market-leading growth stocks in favor of cyclicals, which stand to benefit most as the economy reopens.Industrial and healthcare shares limited the Dow's decline but the blue-chip average reversed course late in the session to snap a three-day streak of record closing highs.\"The market leader","content":"<p>* Electric vehicle shares drop after Workhorse miss</p><p>* Rising commodity prices fuel inflation concerns</p><p>* Tech-related stocks pull Nasdaq lower</p><p>* Indexes down: Dow 0.10%, S&amp;P 1.04%, Nasdaq 2.55%</p><p>NEW YORK, May 10 (Reuters) - Wall Street closed lower on Monday as inflation jitters drove investors away from market-leading growth stocks in favor of cyclicals, which stand to benefit most as the economy reopens.</p><p>Industrial and healthcare shares limited the Dow's decline but the blue-chip average reversed course late in the session to snap a three-day streak of record closing highs.</p><p>\"The market leadership is not doing all that well this year,\" said Paul Nolte, portfolio manager at Kingsview Asset Management in Chicago. \"There's been a general rotation away from growth to other parts of the market.\"</p><p>A demand resurgence is colliding with strained supply of basic materials, helping to fuel inflation worries.</p><p>\"Once the supply lines are rebuilt this will go away. But it's going to take some time,\" Nolte added. \"It's different from flipping on a light switch.\"</p><p>The break-even rate on five-year and 10-year U.S. Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TIPS\">$(TIPS)$</a> touched their highest levels since 2011 and 2013, respectively.</p><p>\"There's still some push and pull as to whether the market believes inflation is transitory or something that's going to stick around,\" Nolte said.</p><p>Inflation concerns will be in the minds of investors when the Labor Department releases its latest CPI report on Wednesday.</p><p>A shutdown to halt a ransomware attack on the Colonial Pipeline entered its fourth day, hobbling a network which transports nearly half of the East Coast's fuel supplies.</p><p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average&nbsp;fell 34.94 points, or 0.1%, to 34,742.82, the S&amp;P 500&nbsp;lost 44.17 points, or 1.04%, to 4,188.43 and the Nasdaq Composite&nbsp;dropped 350.38 points, or 2.55%, to 13,401.86.</p><p>Of the 11 major sectors in the S&amp;P 500, six closed red. Tech was the biggest loser, sliding 2.5%.</p><p>First-quarter reporting season has entered the home stretch, with 439 of the companies in the S&amp;P 500 having reported as of Friday. Of those, 87% have beaten consensus expectations, according to Refinitiv IBES.</p><p>Analysts now see year-on-year S&amp;P earnings growth of 50.4% on aggregate, more than double the rate forecast at the beginning of April and significantly better than the 16% first-quarter growth expected on January 1, per Refinitiv</p><p>Hotel operator Marriott International Inc&nbsp;missed quarterly profit and revenue expectations due to weak U.S. bookings which offset a rebound in China. Its shares fell 4.1%.</p><p>After the bell, its rival Wynn Resorts Ltd&nbsp;missed quarterly earnings and revenue estimates. Its shares were up in after-hours trading.</p><p>Electric vehicle stocks put on the brakes, with Tesla Inc&nbsp;down 6.4% and Fisker&nbsp;off 9.0% after Workhorse Group    missed quarterly revenue expectations. Workhorse lost 14.9% on the day.</p><p>FireEye&nbsp;rose 1.2% after industry sources identified the cybersecurity firm as among those helping Colonial Pipeline recover from the recent cyberattack.</p><p>Declining issues outnumbered advancing ones on the NYSE by a 1.88-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 3.24-to-1 ratio favored decliners.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 posted 223 new 52-week highs and no new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 208 new highs and 148 new lows.</p><p>Volume on U.S. exchanges was 10.97 billion shares, compared with the 10.20 billion average over the last 20 trading days.</p><p><b>Here are</b>&nbsp;<b>company's financial statements</b></p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/NW/2134656364\" target=\"_blank\">Occidental Petroleum loss narrows as crude prices rebound</a></p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/NW/2134406655\" target=\"_blank\">Affirm beats on revenue, sees early recovery in travel spending</a></p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/NW/2134439656\" target=\"_blank\">Yalla Group Ltd QTRLY Earnings Per Share $0.11 From Continued Operations</a></p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/NW/2134564536\" target=\"_blank\">TuSimple Holdings EPS beats by $0.01, misses on revenue</a></p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/NW/2134659571\" target=\"_blank\">Novavax Reports Q1 Loss, Tops Revenue Estimates</a></p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/NW/2134995659\" target=\"_blank\">3D Systems Surpasses Q1 Earnings and Revenue Estimates</a></p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/NW/1145839299\" target=\"_blank\">Virgin Galactic shares fall after another quarterly loss, no date set for next spaceflight test</a></p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/NW/1169419141\" target=\"_blank\">Roblox revenue grows 140% in first earnings report since company went public</a></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Wall Street closes lower as inflation fears prompt tech sell-off</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWall Street closes lower as inflation fears prompt tech sell-off\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-05-11 04:26</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>* Electric vehicle shares drop after Workhorse miss</p><p>* Rising commodity prices fuel inflation concerns</p><p>* Tech-related stocks pull Nasdaq lower</p><p>* Indexes down: Dow 0.10%, S&amp;P 1.04%, Nasdaq 2.55%</p><p>NEW YORK, May 10 (Reuters) - Wall Street closed lower on Monday as inflation jitters drove investors away from market-leading growth stocks in favor of cyclicals, which stand to benefit most as the economy reopens.</p><p>Industrial and healthcare shares limited the Dow's decline but the blue-chip average reversed course late in the session to snap a three-day streak of record closing highs.</p><p>\"The market leadership is not doing all that well this year,\" said Paul Nolte, portfolio manager at Kingsview Asset Management in Chicago. \"There's been a general rotation away from growth to other parts of the market.\"</p><p>A demand resurgence is colliding with strained supply of basic materials, helping to fuel inflation worries.</p><p>\"Once the supply lines are rebuilt this will go away. But it's going to take some time,\" Nolte added. \"It's different from flipping on a light switch.\"</p><p>The break-even rate on five-year and 10-year U.S. Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TIPS\">$(TIPS)$</a> touched their highest levels since 2011 and 2013, respectively.</p><p>\"There's still some push and pull as to whether the market believes inflation is transitory or something that's going to stick around,\" Nolte said.</p><p>Inflation concerns will be in the minds of investors when the Labor Department releases its latest CPI report on Wednesday.</p><p>A shutdown to halt a ransomware attack on the Colonial Pipeline entered its fourth day, hobbling a network which transports nearly half of the East Coast's fuel supplies.</p><p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average&nbsp;fell 34.94 points, or 0.1%, to 34,742.82, the S&amp;P 500&nbsp;lost 44.17 points, or 1.04%, to 4,188.43 and the Nasdaq Composite&nbsp;dropped 350.38 points, or 2.55%, to 13,401.86.</p><p>Of the 11 major sectors in the S&amp;P 500, six closed red. Tech was the biggest loser, sliding 2.5%.</p><p>First-quarter reporting season has entered the home stretch, with 439 of the companies in the S&amp;P 500 having reported as of Friday. Of those, 87% have beaten consensus expectations, according to Refinitiv IBES.</p><p>Analysts now see year-on-year S&amp;P earnings growth of 50.4% on aggregate, more than double the rate forecast at the beginning of April and significantly better than the 16% first-quarter growth expected on January 1, per Refinitiv</p><p>Hotel operator Marriott International Inc&nbsp;missed quarterly profit and revenue expectations due to weak U.S. bookings which offset a rebound in China. Its shares fell 4.1%.</p><p>After the bell, its rival Wynn Resorts Ltd&nbsp;missed quarterly earnings and revenue estimates. Its shares were up in after-hours trading.</p><p>Electric vehicle stocks put on the brakes, with Tesla Inc&nbsp;down 6.4% and Fisker&nbsp;off 9.0% after Workhorse Group    missed quarterly revenue expectations. Workhorse lost 14.9% on the day.</p><p>FireEye&nbsp;rose 1.2% after industry sources identified the cybersecurity firm as among those helping Colonial Pipeline recover from the recent cyberattack.</p><p>Declining issues outnumbered advancing ones on the NYSE by a 1.88-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 3.24-to-1 ratio favored decliners.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 posted 223 new 52-week highs and no new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 208 new highs and 148 new lows.</p><p>Volume on U.S. exchanges was 10.97 billion shares, compared with the 10.20 billion average over the last 20 trading days.</p><p><b>Here are</b>&nbsp;<b>company's financial statements</b></p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/NW/2134656364\" target=\"_blank\">Occidental Petroleum loss narrows as crude prices rebound</a></p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/NW/2134406655\" target=\"_blank\">Affirm beats on revenue, sees early recovery in travel spending</a></p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/NW/2134439656\" target=\"_blank\">Yalla Group Ltd QTRLY Earnings Per Share $0.11 From Continued Operations</a></p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/NW/2134564536\" target=\"_blank\">TuSimple Holdings EPS beats by $0.01, misses on revenue</a></p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/NW/2134659571\" target=\"_blank\">Novavax Reports Q1 Loss, Tops Revenue Estimates</a></p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/NW/2134995659\" target=\"_blank\">3D Systems Surpasses Q1 Earnings and Revenue Estimates</a></p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/NW/1145839299\" target=\"_blank\">Virgin Galactic shares fall after another quarterly loss, no date set for next spaceflight test</a></p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/NW/1169419141\" target=\"_blank\">Roblox revenue grows 140% in first earnings report since company went public</a></p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2134551566","content_text":"* Electric vehicle shares drop after Workhorse miss* Rising commodity prices fuel inflation concerns* Tech-related stocks pull Nasdaq lower* Indexes down: Dow 0.10%, S&P 1.04%, Nasdaq 2.55%NEW YORK, May 10 (Reuters) - Wall Street closed lower on Monday as inflation jitters drove investors away from market-leading growth stocks in favor of cyclicals, which stand to benefit most as the economy reopens.Industrial and healthcare shares limited the Dow's decline but the blue-chip average reversed course late in the session to snap a three-day streak of record closing highs.\"The market leadership is not doing all that well this year,\" said Paul Nolte, portfolio manager at Kingsview Asset Management in Chicago. \"There's been a general rotation away from growth to other parts of the market.\"A demand resurgence is colliding with strained supply of basic materials, helping to fuel inflation worries.\"Once the supply lines are rebuilt this will go away. But it's going to take some time,\" Nolte added. \"It's different from flipping on a light switch.\"The break-even rate on five-year and 10-year U.S. Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities $(TIPS)$ touched their highest levels since 2011 and 2013, respectively.\"There's still some push and pull as to whether the market believes inflation is transitory or something that's going to stick around,\" Nolte said.Inflation concerns will be in the minds of investors when the Labor Department releases its latest CPI report on Wednesday.A shutdown to halt a ransomware attack on the Colonial Pipeline entered its fourth day, hobbling a network which transports nearly half of the East Coast's fuel supplies.The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 34.94 points, or 0.1%, to 34,742.82, the S&P 500 lost 44.17 points, or 1.04%, to 4,188.43 and the Nasdaq Composite dropped 350.38 points, or 2.55%, to 13,401.86.Of the 11 major sectors in the S&P 500, six closed red. Tech was the biggest loser, sliding 2.5%.First-quarter reporting season has entered the home stretch, with 439 of the companies in the S&P 500 having reported as of Friday. Of those, 87% have beaten consensus expectations, according to Refinitiv IBES.Analysts now see year-on-year S&P earnings growth of 50.4% on aggregate, more than double the rate forecast at the beginning of April and significantly better than the 16% first-quarter growth expected on January 1, per RefinitivHotel operator Marriott International Inc missed quarterly profit and revenue expectations due to weak U.S. bookings which offset a rebound in China. Its shares fell 4.1%.After the bell, its rival Wynn Resorts Ltd missed quarterly earnings and revenue estimates. Its shares were up in after-hours trading.Electric vehicle stocks put on the brakes, with Tesla Inc down 6.4% and Fisker off 9.0% after Workhorse Group    missed quarterly revenue expectations. Workhorse lost 14.9% on the day.FireEye rose 1.2% after industry sources identified the cybersecurity firm as among those helping Colonial Pipeline recover from the recent cyberattack.Declining issues outnumbered advancing ones on the NYSE by a 1.88-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 3.24-to-1 ratio favored decliners.The S&P 500 posted 223 new 52-week highs and no new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 208 new highs and 148 new lows.Volume on U.S. exchanges was 10.97 billion shares, compared with the 10.20 billion average over the last 20 trading days.Here are company's financial statementsOccidental Petroleum loss narrows as crude prices reboundAffirm beats on revenue, sees early recovery in travel spendingYalla Group Ltd QTRLY Earnings Per Share $0.11 From Continued OperationsTuSimple Holdings EPS beats by $0.01, misses on revenueNovavax Reports Q1 Loss, Tops Revenue Estimates3D Systems Surpasses Q1 Earnings and Revenue EstimatesVirgin Galactic shares fall after another quarterly loss, no date set for next spaceflight testRoblox revenue grows 140% in first earnings report since company went public","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":417,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":160081511,"gmtCreate":1623766576333,"gmtModify":1703818759919,"author":{"id":"3570426503709368","authorId":"3570426503709368","name":"CWei92","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/63c5dff1b0ab726006ec156ccbcb83c2","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570426503709368","authorIdStr":"3570426503709368"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"like and comment please","listText":"like and comment please","text":"like and comment please","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/160081511","repostId":"1175229651","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1175229651","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1623761854,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1175229651?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-15 20:57","market":"us","language":"en","title":"'Gonna Need More Stimmies' - US Retail Sales Plunged In May","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1175229651","media":"zerohedge","summary":"With a lack of stimmies to keep the spending dream alive, analysts expected a 0.8% MoM plunge in ret","content":"<p>With a lack of stimmies to keep the spending dream alive, analysts expected a 0.8% MoM plunge in retail sales (<i>confirming BofA's recent perfect streak of predictions</i>), but the data was even worse, tumbling 1.3% MoM...</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/45b8615441c602f54053c2e255ce180a\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"274\"><i>Source: Bloomberg</i></p>\n<p>Given the expected impact of autos from the chip shortage,<b>a \"cleaner\" number of the Ex-Autos print which was also a disaster,</b>tumbling 0.7% MoM (much worse than the 0.4% improvement expected)</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/29613437d5cc305349ea8b7f9b50ab0f\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"272\"><i>Source: Bloomberg</i></p>\n<p>BofA's forecasts nailed it again:</p>\n<ul>\n <li>BofA said retail headline -1.4%, came in at -1.4%</li>\n <li>BofA said retail ex auto -0.6%, came in at -0.7%</li>\n</ul>\n<p>Building Materials saw the biggest drop, along with Motor Vehicles (as noted above). Nonstore retailers (online) also saw a decline in sales...</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6d94f95a16decd0cf5893fd4408feb6c\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"435\">As the base effect wears off so the insane YoY comps ease back too...</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/049936d252903cc97f3b4cd8abec9044\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"273\"><i>Source: Bloomberg</i></p>\n<p>Finally, we note that retail inventories (supply) has reached a record low relative to retail sales (demand)...</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/70b0549aa7160c7d4b2b96a17a25d15d\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"271\"><i>Source: Bloomberg</i></p>\n<p>How will The Fed interpret this? Transitory supply distress?</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>'Gonna Need More Stimmies' - US Retail Sales Plunged In May</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n'Gonna Need More Stimmies' - US Retail Sales Plunged In May\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-06-15 20:57 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.zerohedge.com/personal-finance/gonna-need-more-stimmies-us-retail-sales-plunged-may><strong>zerohedge</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>With a lack of stimmies to keep the spending dream alive, analysts expected a 0.8% MoM plunge in retail sales (confirming BofA's recent perfect streak of predictions), but the data was even worse, ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/personal-finance/gonna-need-more-stimmies-us-retail-sales-plunged-may\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SPY":"标普500ETF",".DJI":"道琼斯",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/personal-finance/gonna-need-more-stimmies-us-retail-sales-plunged-may","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1175229651","content_text":"With a lack of stimmies to keep the spending dream alive, analysts expected a 0.8% MoM plunge in retail sales (confirming BofA's recent perfect streak of predictions), but the data was even worse, tumbling 1.3% MoM...\nSource: Bloomberg\nGiven the expected impact of autos from the chip shortage,a \"cleaner\" number of the Ex-Autos print which was also a disaster,tumbling 0.7% MoM (much worse than the 0.4% improvement expected)\nSource: Bloomberg\nBofA's forecasts nailed it again:\n\nBofA said retail headline -1.4%, came in at -1.4%\nBofA said retail ex auto -0.6%, came in at -0.7%\n\nBuilding Materials saw the biggest drop, along with Motor Vehicles (as noted above). Nonstore retailers (online) also saw a decline in sales...\nAs the base effect wears off so the insane YoY comps ease back too...\nSource: Bloomberg\nFinally, we note that retail inventories (supply) has reached a record low relative to retail sales (demand)...\nSource: Bloomberg\nHow will The Fed interpret this? Transitory supply distress?","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":559,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":118014827,"gmtCreate":1622707755970,"gmtModify":1704189333630,"author":{"id":"3570426503709368","authorId":"3570426503709368","name":"CWei92","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/63c5dff1b0ab726006ec156ccbcb83c2","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570426503709368","authorIdStr":"3570426503709368"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"like and comment thanks","listText":"like and comment thanks","text":"like and comment thanks","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/118014827","repostId":"1160407593","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1160407593","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1622706069,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1160407593?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-03 15:41","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Is Apple Stock Overvalued?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1160407593","media":"seekingalpha","summary":"Despite crushing Q2 earnings estimates, Apple shares have gone in reverse and are underperforming the broader market.I believe Wall Street expectations for Apple's FY2022 are unreasonably high and likely contributing to the recent weakness.Apple's Price/Earnings, Price/Sales, and Price/Free Cash flow still remain significantly elevated to historical levels.I have serious doubt that iPhone, iPad, and Mac sales can continue the current hot sales pace over the next year.Apple  bulls have to be frus","content":"<p><b>Summary</b></p>\n<ul>\n <li>Despite crushing Q2 earnings estimates, Apple shares have gone in reverse and are underperforming the broader market.</li>\n <li>I believe Wall Street expectations for Apple's FY2022 are unreasonably high and likely contributing to the recent weakness.</li>\n <li>Apple's Price/Earnings, Price/Sales, and Price/Free Cash flow still remain&nbsp;significantly elevated&nbsp;to historical levels.</li>\n <li>I have serious doubt that iPhone, iPad, and Mac sales can continue the current hot sales pace over the next year.</li>\n</ul>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bff81a333ee2ce5596e83df474ea7f56\" tg-width=\"768\" tg-height=\"511\"><span>Photo by PeskyMonkey/iStock Editorial via Getty Images</span></p>\n<p>Apple (AAPL) bulls have to be frustrated. Despite massive earnings beats in both its&nbsp;Q1 holiday quarter&nbsp;and&nbsp;Q2 January-March quarter, the shares have gone no where. The&nbsp;thesis from my last article&nbsp;on Apple, that COVID-19 lockdowns, government handouts, and the launch of 5G all culminated to pull demand into Apple's FY21 year,gained a supporter from analysts at New Street, who are now predicting the same.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1e41696d20058f8ca97f59715bca52b8\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"405\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>New Street isn't predicting that the sky is falling, and neither am I. They are just modeling<i>iPhone shipments in the 180M-200M range versus the 234M consensus.</i>Does this sound like an extreme view? I don't think it is, especially since SA Contributor Paulo Santos has been&nbsp;tracking iPhone sales in China&nbsp;and has seen a significant slowdown from the white-hot start to the beginning of this year. I think similar slowdowns for iPad and Mac are a few quarters away.</p>\n<p><b>What is AAPL's current valuation? Does it make sense?</b></p>\n<p>From the comments I've received on my last two articles, bulls must think I hate Apple and have an axe to grind. This could not be further from the truth. I've owned Apple outright many times in the past, and still own a significant stake in it through my Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.B) holdings. So I'm not rooting against it by any stretch, I'm just calling it like I see it - and I see the valuation as very stretched.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/242125db79bcaf3f8697bf4466c3f0c8\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"464\"><span>Data by YCharts</span></p>\n<p>Apple's Price/Earnings, Price/Sales, and Price/Free Cash flow still remain&nbsp;<b>significantly elevated</b>- 50% or more - from their historic norms.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2397347f029ba2ba682fa1398109d5e7\" tg-width=\"584\" tg-height=\"160\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>This is a key issue because the forward revenue growth and earnings estimates for Apple are already low and predict minimal growth. At these rates, nearly all of the earnings growth would come from the share repurchases.</p>\n<p>But these forward estimates assume Apple will repeat the record year they are having again in FY2022. I think the odds of that happening are slim. Instead, I expect a similar situation of what happened between FY2014-FY2016, where operating earnings increased significantly from FY2014 to FY2015, then declined moderately in FY2016.</p>\n<p><b>Apple's FY21 could be peak sales and earnings for a long time</b></p>\n<p>Since 2016, Apple has introduced a lot of successful new products: the Apple Watch, AirPods, and Apple TV, to go along with many new versions of Mac, iPhone, and iPad, along with impressive growth in Services.</p>\n<p>Yet with all of that success, Apple's Operating Income peaked in 2015 until shattering the prior peak over the last 12 months. From 2015-2020, Apple was able to grow EPS roughly 7%, with significant help from share repurchases and the TCJA corporate income tax cut. (Without this tax cut, 2020 EPS would have been ~$2.88 rather than $3.28, implying an EPS growth rate of around 4.5%.)</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3a878730fc1ed62d2dc0166d9aa16c21\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"279\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>Ultimately, I believe Apple's recent torrid sales performance will not be repeated and should not be considered a new run rate like Wall Street analysts are modeling. I look at iPad sales as an illustration of this. For the last several years, volumes had been steady until exploding 57% last year and continuing the same strength early this year.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/11c5c505d2f2c147fc7ee546576a5945\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"582\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>Did iPads suddenly become so much more popular? Or were there just a lot of parents working from home that wanted iPads for their kids? I'm going with the latter.</p>\n<p><b>Conclusion - Apple is still a Sell</b></p>\n<p>Wall St. analysts wasted no time increasing earnings expectations for next year based on what I believe is mostly an extrapolation of the current results.</p>\n<p>Admittedly, I'm less bullish on the 5G Supercycle than most. I believe that the innovators and early adopters will rush to upgrade, but most of the mass market will remain on the normal upgrade cadence, which continues to lengthen. I think the iPhone is a victim of its own success - that the recent iPhones are all so good, upgrading to newer phones is less compelling, and because 4G is \"good enough\" for most people.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3a5047edb2490f12fb4259f905c7fbac\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"305\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>Apple earned $2.97 in 2019. They've already earned $3.08 in the first two quarters of this year and current estimates are $5.16 for the full fiscal. Even with the growth in Services, I just do not see them repeating this performance next fiscal year, and expect earnings closer to the $4-4.50/share range, far short of the $5.30 that's currently expected. That would put Price/Earnings back above 30 with a negative growth rate. If this happens, shares could retest the $100 level.</p>\n<p>Apple is still a sell here for me. It's a great company that's simply priced too richly. Valuation always matters.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Is Apple Stock Overvalued?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nIs Apple Stock Overvalued?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-06-03 15:41 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4432646-apple-stock-overvalued><strong>seekingalpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Summary\n\nDespite crushing Q2 earnings estimates, Apple shares have gone in reverse and are underperforming the broader market.\nI believe Wall Street expectations for Apple's FY2022 are unreasonably ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4432646-apple-stock-overvalued\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4432646-apple-stock-overvalued","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1160407593","content_text":"Summary\n\nDespite crushing Q2 earnings estimates, Apple shares have gone in reverse and are underperforming the broader market.\nI believe Wall Street expectations for Apple's FY2022 are unreasonably high and likely contributing to the recent weakness.\nApple's Price/Earnings, Price/Sales, and Price/Free Cash flow still remain significantly elevated to historical levels.\nI have serious doubt that iPhone, iPad, and Mac sales can continue the current hot sales pace over the next year.\n\nPhoto by PeskyMonkey/iStock Editorial via Getty Images\nApple (AAPL) bulls have to be frustrated. Despite massive earnings beats in both its Q1 holiday quarter and Q2 January-March quarter, the shares have gone no where. The thesis from my last article on Apple, that COVID-19 lockdowns, government handouts, and the launch of 5G all culminated to pull demand into Apple's FY21 year,gained a supporter from analysts at New Street, who are now predicting the same.\n\nNew Street isn't predicting that the sky is falling, and neither am I. They are just modelingiPhone shipments in the 180M-200M range versus the 234M consensus.Does this sound like an extreme view? I don't think it is, especially since SA Contributor Paulo Santos has been tracking iPhone sales in China and has seen a significant slowdown from the white-hot start to the beginning of this year. I think similar slowdowns for iPad and Mac are a few quarters away.\nWhat is AAPL's current valuation? Does it make sense?\nFrom the comments I've received on my last two articles, bulls must think I hate Apple and have an axe to grind. This could not be further from the truth. I've owned Apple outright many times in the past, and still own a significant stake in it through my Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.B) holdings. So I'm not rooting against it by any stretch, I'm just calling it like I see it - and I see the valuation as very stretched.\nData by YCharts\nApple's Price/Earnings, Price/Sales, and Price/Free Cash flow still remain significantly elevated- 50% or more - from their historic norms.\n\nThis is a key issue because the forward revenue growth and earnings estimates for Apple are already low and predict minimal growth. At these rates, nearly all of the earnings growth would come from the share repurchases.\nBut these forward estimates assume Apple will repeat the record year they are having again in FY2022. I think the odds of that happening are slim. Instead, I expect a similar situation of what happened between FY2014-FY2016, where operating earnings increased significantly from FY2014 to FY2015, then declined moderately in FY2016.\nApple's FY21 could be peak sales and earnings for a long time\nSince 2016, Apple has introduced a lot of successful new products: the Apple Watch, AirPods, and Apple TV, to go along with many new versions of Mac, iPhone, and iPad, along with impressive growth in Services.\nYet with all of that success, Apple's Operating Income peaked in 2015 until shattering the prior peak over the last 12 months. From 2015-2020, Apple was able to grow EPS roughly 7%, with significant help from share repurchases and the TCJA corporate income tax cut. (Without this tax cut, 2020 EPS would have been ~$2.88 rather than $3.28, implying an EPS growth rate of around 4.5%.)\n\nUltimately, I believe Apple's recent torrid sales performance will not be repeated and should not be considered a new run rate like Wall Street analysts are modeling. I look at iPad sales as an illustration of this. For the last several years, volumes had been steady until exploding 57% last year and continuing the same strength early this year.\n\nDid iPads suddenly become so much more popular? Or were there just a lot of parents working from home that wanted iPads for their kids? I'm going with the latter.\nConclusion - Apple is still a Sell\nWall St. analysts wasted no time increasing earnings expectations for next year based on what I believe is mostly an extrapolation of the current results.\nAdmittedly, I'm less bullish on the 5G Supercycle than most. I believe that the innovators and early adopters will rush to upgrade, but most of the mass market will remain on the normal upgrade cadence, which continues to lengthen. I think the iPhone is a victim of its own success - that the recent iPhones are all so good, upgrading to newer phones is less compelling, and because 4G is \"good enough\" for most people.\n\nApple earned $2.97 in 2019. They've already earned $3.08 in the first two quarters of this year and current estimates are $5.16 for the full fiscal. Even with the growth in Services, I just do not see them repeating this performance next fiscal year, and expect earnings closer to the $4-4.50/share range, far short of the $5.30 that's currently expected. That would put Price/Earnings back above 30 with a negative growth rate. If this happens, shares could retest the $100 level.\nApple is still a sell here for me. It's a great company that's simply priced too richly. Valuation always matters.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":544,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":192929639,"gmtCreate":1621138489321,"gmtModify":1704353268173,"author":{"id":"3570426503709368","authorId":"3570426503709368","name":"CWei92","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/63c5dff1b0ab726006ec156ccbcb83c2","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570426503709368","authorIdStr":"3570426503709368"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"nice","listText":"nice","text":"nice","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/192929639","repostId":"2135069756","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":586,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":105167030,"gmtCreate":1620279511720,"gmtModify":1704341272894,"author":{"id":"3570426503709368","authorId":"3570426503709368","name":"CWei92","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/63c5dff1b0ab726006ec156ccbcb83c2","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570426503709368","authorIdStr":"3570426503709368"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"like and comment","listText":"like and comment","text":"like and comment","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/105167030","repostId":"2133652936","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2133652936","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1620244873,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2133652936?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-05-06 04:01","market":"hk","language":"en","title":"Dow ends at record high，Nasdaq falls as tech slides","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2133652936","media":"Reuters","summary":"May 5 (Reuters) - The Dow Jones Industrial Average ended at a record high on Wednesday, while Nasdaq","content":"<p>May 5 (Reuters) - The Dow Jones Industrial Average ended at a record high on Wednesday, while Nasdaq gave up its earlier gains and closed in red.</p><p>Energy and materials continued this week's momentum, leading gains among S&amp;P 500 sectors. Defensive utilities and real estate led sectoral declines.</p><p>\"Energy, financial, materials, industrials are all outperforming. They tend to be cyclically oriented sectors and tend to benefit during periods when the economies are reopening and expanding,\" said Terry Sandven, chief equity strategist at U.S. Bank Wealth Management.</p><p>The Philadelphia SE Semiconductor index recovered from a sell-off on Tuesday. Megacap technology companies including Amazon.com Inc and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FB\">Facebook</a> Inc and Alphabet Inc were down.</p><p>Strong economic data and earnings pushed the S&amp;P 500 and Nasdaq indexes to record high last week, but markets have wobbled amid concerns about rising inflation and potentially higher U.S. interest rates.</p><p>\"Once you have markets hitting the highs we have seen recently, the <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE\">one</a> thing investors are worried about is rising inflation and what that means for profitability of companies,\" said Shawn Cruz, senior market strategist at TD Ameritrade.</p><p>Tech sell-off accelerated on Tuesday after Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen suggested that interest rates might need to rise in an overheating economy.</p><p>She later clarified that a near-term interest rate hike was not something she was \"predicting or recommending\" on Tuesday evening.</p><p>The ADP National Employment Report showed U.S. private payrolls increased in April as companies rushed to boost production amid a surge in demand, powered by massive government aid and rising vaccinations against COVID-19.</p><p>A more comprehensive reading in the form of the Labor Department's non-farm payrolls data is due on Friday.</p><p>Unofficially, the Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 96.99 points, or 0.28%, to 34,230.02, the S&amp;P 500 gained 2.97 points, or 0.07%, to 4,167.63 and the Nasdaq Composite dropped 51.08 points, or 0.37%, to 13,582.43.</p><p>Peloton Interactive Inc hit a seven-month low on its announcement to recall its treadmills amid reports of multiple injuries and the death of a child in an accident.</p><p>Boeing Co fell after U.S. air safety officials asked it to supply fresh analysis and documentation showing 737 MAX subsystems would not be affected by electrical grounding issues.</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TMUSR\">T-Mobile US Inc</a> jumped as it raised its full-year postpaid subscriber net additions forecast.</p><p>Uber Technologies Inc is set to report earnings after markets close on Wednesday.</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/NW/1108837445\" target=\"_blank\">Uber losses dramatically improve thanks to sale of self-driving unit</a></p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/NW/1190727792\" target=\"_blank\">PayPal CEO touts ‘next generation digital wallet’ after earnings beat</a></p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/NW/1185637253\" target=\"_blank\">Twilio Surpasses Q1 Earnings and Revenue Estimates</a></p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/NW/1118316842\" target=\"_blank\">The Allstate Corp Q1 adjusted earnings of $6.11 per share</a></p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/NW/1144806506\" target=\"_blank\">Etsy slides more than 10% after it warns of slowing growth</a></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Dow ends at record high，Nasdaq falls as tech slides</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nDow ends at record high，Nasdaq falls as tech slides\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-05-06 04:01 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.reuters.com/business/dow-ends-record-high-nasdaq-falls-tech-slides-2021-05-05/><strong>Reuters</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>May 5 (Reuters) - The Dow Jones Industrial Average ended at a record high on Wednesday, while Nasdaq gave up its earlier gains and closed in red.Energy and materials continued this week's momentum, ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.reuters.com/business/dow-ends-record-high-nasdaq-falls-tech-slides-2021-05-05/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"161125":"标普500","513500":"标普500ETF","LHDX":"Lucira Health, Inc.","SH":"标普500反向ETF","APR":"Apria, Inc.","IVV":"标普500指数ETF","SANA":"Sana Biotechnology, Inc.","OEF":"标普100指数ETF-iShares","UPRO":"三倍做多标普500ETF","SSO":"两倍做多标普500ETF","CGEM":"Cullinan Therapeutics","LABP":"Landos Biopharma, Inc.","SPXU":"三倍做空标普500ETF","03086":"华夏纳指","BA":"波音","SDS":"两倍做空标普500ETF","OEX":"标普100",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","COMP":"Compass, Inc.","09086":"华夏纳指-U","QNETCN":"纳斯达克中美互联网老虎指数"},"source_url":"https://www.reuters.com/business/dow-ends-record-high-nasdaq-falls-tech-slides-2021-05-05/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2133652936","content_text":"May 5 (Reuters) - The Dow Jones Industrial Average ended at a record high on Wednesday, while Nasdaq gave up its earlier gains and closed in red.Energy and materials continued this week's momentum, leading gains among S&P 500 sectors. Defensive utilities and real estate led sectoral declines.\"Energy, financial, materials, industrials are all outperforming. They tend to be cyclically oriented sectors and tend to benefit during periods when the economies are reopening and expanding,\" said Terry Sandven, chief equity strategist at U.S. Bank Wealth Management.The Philadelphia SE Semiconductor index recovered from a sell-off on Tuesday. Megacap technology companies including Amazon.com Inc and Facebook Inc and Alphabet Inc were down.Strong economic data and earnings pushed the S&P 500 and Nasdaq indexes to record high last week, but markets have wobbled amid concerns about rising inflation and potentially higher U.S. interest rates.\"Once you have markets hitting the highs we have seen recently, the one thing investors are worried about is rising inflation and what that means for profitability of companies,\" said Shawn Cruz, senior market strategist at TD Ameritrade.Tech sell-off accelerated on Tuesday after Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen suggested that interest rates might need to rise in an overheating economy.She later clarified that a near-term interest rate hike was not something she was \"predicting or recommending\" on Tuesday evening.The ADP National Employment Report showed U.S. private payrolls increased in April as companies rushed to boost production amid a surge in demand, powered by massive government aid and rising vaccinations against COVID-19.A more comprehensive reading in the form of the Labor Department's non-farm payrolls data is due on Friday.Unofficially, the Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 96.99 points, or 0.28%, to 34,230.02, the S&P 500 gained 2.97 points, or 0.07%, to 4,167.63 and the Nasdaq Composite dropped 51.08 points, or 0.37%, to 13,582.43.Peloton Interactive Inc hit a seven-month low on its announcement to recall its treadmills amid reports of multiple injuries and the death of a child in an accident.Boeing Co fell after U.S. air safety officials asked it to supply fresh analysis and documentation showing 737 MAX subsystems would not be affected by electrical grounding issues.T-Mobile US Inc jumped as it raised its full-year postpaid subscriber net additions forecast.Uber Technologies Inc is set to report earnings after markets close on Wednesday.Uber losses dramatically improve thanks to sale of self-driving unitPayPal CEO touts ‘next generation digital wallet’ after earnings beatTwilio Surpasses Q1 Earnings and Revenue EstimatesThe Allstate Corp Q1 adjusted earnings of $6.11 per shareEtsy slides more than 10% after it warns of slowing growth","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":309,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":170156401,"gmtCreate":1626414832903,"gmtModify":1703759717797,"author":{"id":"3570426503709368","authorId":"3570426503709368","name":"CWei92","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/63c5dff1b0ab726006ec156ccbcb83c2","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570426503709368","authorIdStr":"3570426503709368"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"good","listText":"good","text":"good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/170156401","repostId":"1124361019","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1124361019","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1626413039,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1124361019?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-16 13:23","market":"us","language":"en","title":"'Boring '20s'? - a decade of zero real rates :Mike Dolan","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1124361019","media":"Reuters","summary":"(The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters.)\nLONDON, July 16 (Reu","content":"<p>(The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters.)</p>\n<p>LONDON, July 16 (Reuters) - The U.S. government can once again borrow at a deeply negative ‘real’ rate of minus 1.0% for 10 years - and some economists insist there’s a powerful historical case for expecting that rate to stay near zero or below for the rest of the decade.</p>\n<p>It’s been fashionable in markets of late to think of another “Roaring ‘20s” emerging over the next decade. Pandemic-driven megatrends, fractious politics, gigantic government debt piles and the return of inflation could all conspire to electrify or unnerve markets over the years ahead - or so the story goes.</p>\n<p>But after a restive first quarter of 2021, global bond markets - still under the spell of heavy central bank buying - appear to be pricing in a very different scenario ahead.</p>\n<p>Even after this week’s June readout of the highest annual gain in U.S. core consumer prices in 30 years - an inflation rate of some 4.5% excluding food and energy prices - the yield on the Treasury’s 10-year inflation-protected bond skidded back below -1.0% for the first time in five months.</p>\n<p>Aside from that brief moment in February, these rates have never been lower - at least not in the history of these securities. And all equivalent rates in the G4 major economies are also below zero, with Germany and Britain even lower than those in the United States.</p>\n<p>Investors pore over everything from ‘peak inflation’ to ‘peak growth’ and even ‘peak stimulus’ for clues as to why bond yields continue to defy forecasts and why they have taken the surge in inflation and government debt levels in their stride.</p>\n<p>U.S. government debt will top 125% of gross domestic product this year and next - its highest since World War Two - and up almost 20 percentage points since before the pandemic. Debt/GDP in G4 economies overall has risen by a similar amount to 125%.</p>\n<p>While many put the seeming nonchalance down to persistent central bank intervention or technical quirks, some also point out to the risk of a weakening ‘fiscal impulse’ over the next two years that mathematically drags on growth rates.</p>\n<p>Manulife Investment Management economist Frances Donald thinks this should be seen as a “fiscal cliff” and the drop in U.S. spending - viewed as a share of resulting falling budget deficit - marks the steepest such cliff since the 1940s.</p>\n<p><b>HIGH PRESSURE</b></p>\n<p>However, G7 leaders pledged last month not to make the mistakes of the last crisis by reducing government spending too soon and reverting to fiscal austerity too early.</p>\n<p>The White House and congressional Democrats at least seem intent on keeping that “high pressure economy” until all sections of society take part. Leading Democrats this week agreed to table another $3.5 trillion investment plan on top of the proposed $600 billion of infrastructure spending already in the pipeline.</p>\n<p>And yet the bond market barely flickered at the prospect.</p>\n<p>Is this just the Federal Reserve’s hand? Is Fed buying really so dominant and can it remain so for years?</p>\n<p>Fed chief Jerome Powell was this week pointedly reluctant to give Congress any hard timeline for a reduction in bond buying and continued to characterize inflation spikes as mostly temporary base effects and bottlenecks from pandemic lockdowns.</p>\n<p>But if the Fed is right about inflation over time and the pursuit of a high pressure economy is now G7 consensus due to equality and climate priorities, history shows bond yields could be down here for a long time to come yet.</p>\n<p>Morgan Stanley economists published a study this week looking at 100 years of data on how countries managed debt blowouts - defined as periods when debt/GDP ratios jumped 20 percentage points in five years.</p>\n<p>They concluded that countries which managed to rein in those debt levels over the subsequent decade had kept looser monetary and fiscal policies longer than those who failed to stop their debt rising. Low debt servicing costs - absent an inflation problem - and growth were shown to be the best ways to keep debts sustainable.</p>\n<p>Studying all outcomes, they reckoned the most successful strategy was to keep real interest rates two percentage points below real GDP growth rates for 10 years and ‘grow out’ of the debt rather than slashing spending. Fiscal consolidation, by contrast, had played a lesser role in the reversal of public debt build-ups over the century, it said.</p>\n<p>On that basis the investment bank saw U.S. real rates held between -0.5% and +0.5% for the next decade - about 2 points below their expected real GDP growth rate.</p>\n<p>While flatlining, that’s still higher than today’s rate - although it assumes some modest Fed tightening at some point.</p>\n<p>And of course, the lower the growth rate, the lower the real rate needs to be to rein in debt loads. Morgan Stanley said that if adverse demographics and productivity depressed real GDP growth more than it thought then real rates as low as today’s may have to be sustained to stop debts rising.</p>\n<p>But it also said most episodes of successful debt reduction had generally been accompanied by only moderate but sustained inflation - a median of 2.9% for those successful in cutting debts. Contrary to popular perceptions, hyperinflation ensued only in a very small number of episodes.</p>\n<p>“Our analysis shows that the real rate environment has been key in determining the path of public debt substantially more so than actual fiscal spending.”</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>'Boring '20s'? - a decade of zero real rates :Mike Dolan</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n'Boring '20s'? - a decade of zero real rates :Mike Dolan\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-07-16 13:23</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>(The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters.)</p>\n<p>LONDON, July 16 (Reuters) - The U.S. government can once again borrow at a deeply negative ‘real’ rate of minus 1.0% for 10 years - and some economists insist there’s a powerful historical case for expecting that rate to stay near zero or below for the rest of the decade.</p>\n<p>It’s been fashionable in markets of late to think of another “Roaring ‘20s” emerging over the next decade. Pandemic-driven megatrends, fractious politics, gigantic government debt piles and the return of inflation could all conspire to electrify or unnerve markets over the years ahead - or so the story goes.</p>\n<p>But after a restive first quarter of 2021, global bond markets - still under the spell of heavy central bank buying - appear to be pricing in a very different scenario ahead.</p>\n<p>Even after this week’s June readout of the highest annual gain in U.S. core consumer prices in 30 years - an inflation rate of some 4.5% excluding food and energy prices - the yield on the Treasury’s 10-year inflation-protected bond skidded back below -1.0% for the first time in five months.</p>\n<p>Aside from that brief moment in February, these rates have never been lower - at least not in the history of these securities. And all equivalent rates in the G4 major economies are also below zero, with Germany and Britain even lower than those in the United States.</p>\n<p>Investors pore over everything from ‘peak inflation’ to ‘peak growth’ and even ‘peak stimulus’ for clues as to why bond yields continue to defy forecasts and why they have taken the surge in inflation and government debt levels in their stride.</p>\n<p>U.S. government debt will top 125% of gross domestic product this year and next - its highest since World War Two - and up almost 20 percentage points since before the pandemic. Debt/GDP in G4 economies overall has risen by a similar amount to 125%.</p>\n<p>While many put the seeming nonchalance down to persistent central bank intervention or technical quirks, some also point out to the risk of a weakening ‘fiscal impulse’ over the next two years that mathematically drags on growth rates.</p>\n<p>Manulife Investment Management economist Frances Donald thinks this should be seen as a “fiscal cliff” and the drop in U.S. spending - viewed as a share of resulting falling budget deficit - marks the steepest such cliff since the 1940s.</p>\n<p><b>HIGH PRESSURE</b></p>\n<p>However, G7 leaders pledged last month not to make the mistakes of the last crisis by reducing government spending too soon and reverting to fiscal austerity too early.</p>\n<p>The White House and congressional Democrats at least seem intent on keeping that “high pressure economy” until all sections of society take part. Leading Democrats this week agreed to table another $3.5 trillion investment plan on top of the proposed $600 billion of infrastructure spending already in the pipeline.</p>\n<p>And yet the bond market barely flickered at the prospect.</p>\n<p>Is this just the Federal Reserve’s hand? Is Fed buying really so dominant and can it remain so for years?</p>\n<p>Fed chief Jerome Powell was this week pointedly reluctant to give Congress any hard timeline for a reduction in bond buying and continued to characterize inflation spikes as mostly temporary base effects and bottlenecks from pandemic lockdowns.</p>\n<p>But if the Fed is right about inflation over time and the pursuit of a high pressure economy is now G7 consensus due to equality and climate priorities, history shows bond yields could be down here for a long time to come yet.</p>\n<p>Morgan Stanley economists published a study this week looking at 100 years of data on how countries managed debt blowouts - defined as periods when debt/GDP ratios jumped 20 percentage points in five years.</p>\n<p>They concluded that countries which managed to rein in those debt levels over the subsequent decade had kept looser monetary and fiscal policies longer than those who failed to stop their debt rising. Low debt servicing costs - absent an inflation problem - and growth were shown to be the best ways to keep debts sustainable.</p>\n<p>Studying all outcomes, they reckoned the most successful strategy was to keep real interest rates two percentage points below real GDP growth rates for 10 years and ‘grow out’ of the debt rather than slashing spending. Fiscal consolidation, by contrast, had played a lesser role in the reversal of public debt build-ups over the century, it said.</p>\n<p>On that basis the investment bank saw U.S. real rates held between -0.5% and +0.5% for the next decade - about 2 points below their expected real GDP growth rate.</p>\n<p>While flatlining, that’s still higher than today’s rate - although it assumes some modest Fed tightening at some point.</p>\n<p>And of course, the lower the growth rate, the lower the real rate needs to be to rein in debt loads. Morgan Stanley said that if adverse demographics and productivity depressed real GDP growth more than it thought then real rates as low as today’s may have to be sustained to stop debts rising.</p>\n<p>But it also said most episodes of successful debt reduction had generally been accompanied by only moderate but sustained inflation - a median of 2.9% for those successful in cutting debts. Contrary to popular perceptions, hyperinflation ensued only in a very small number of episodes.</p>\n<p>“Our analysis shows that the real rate environment has been key in determining the path of public debt substantially more so than actual fiscal spending.”</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SPY":"标普500ETF",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1124361019","content_text":"(The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters.)\nLONDON, July 16 (Reuters) - The U.S. government can once again borrow at a deeply negative ‘real’ rate of minus 1.0% for 10 years - and some economists insist there’s a powerful historical case for expecting that rate to stay near zero or below for the rest of the decade.\nIt’s been fashionable in markets of late to think of another “Roaring ‘20s” emerging over the next decade. Pandemic-driven megatrends, fractious politics, gigantic government debt piles and the return of inflation could all conspire to electrify or unnerve markets over the years ahead - or so the story goes.\nBut after a restive first quarter of 2021, global bond markets - still under the spell of heavy central bank buying - appear to be pricing in a very different scenario ahead.\nEven after this week’s June readout of the highest annual gain in U.S. core consumer prices in 30 years - an inflation rate of some 4.5% excluding food and energy prices - the yield on the Treasury’s 10-year inflation-protected bond skidded back below -1.0% for the first time in five months.\nAside from that brief moment in February, these rates have never been lower - at least not in the history of these securities. And all equivalent rates in the G4 major economies are also below zero, with Germany and Britain even lower than those in the United States.\nInvestors pore over everything from ‘peak inflation’ to ‘peak growth’ and even ‘peak stimulus’ for clues as to why bond yields continue to defy forecasts and why they have taken the surge in inflation and government debt levels in their stride.\nU.S. government debt will top 125% of gross domestic product this year and next - its highest since World War Two - and up almost 20 percentage points since before the pandemic. Debt/GDP in G4 economies overall has risen by a similar amount to 125%.\nWhile many put the seeming nonchalance down to persistent central bank intervention or technical quirks, some also point out to the risk of a weakening ‘fiscal impulse’ over the next two years that mathematically drags on growth rates.\nManulife Investment Management economist Frances Donald thinks this should be seen as a “fiscal cliff” and the drop in U.S. spending - viewed as a share of resulting falling budget deficit - marks the steepest such cliff since the 1940s.\nHIGH PRESSURE\nHowever, G7 leaders pledged last month not to make the mistakes of the last crisis by reducing government spending too soon and reverting to fiscal austerity too early.\nThe White House and congressional Democrats at least seem intent on keeping that “high pressure economy” until all sections of society take part. Leading Democrats this week agreed to table another $3.5 trillion investment plan on top of the proposed $600 billion of infrastructure spending already in the pipeline.\nAnd yet the bond market barely flickered at the prospect.\nIs this just the Federal Reserve’s hand? Is Fed buying really so dominant and can it remain so for years?\nFed chief Jerome Powell was this week pointedly reluctant to give Congress any hard timeline for a reduction in bond buying and continued to characterize inflation spikes as mostly temporary base effects and bottlenecks from pandemic lockdowns.\nBut if the Fed is right about inflation over time and the pursuit of a high pressure economy is now G7 consensus due to equality and climate priorities, history shows bond yields could be down here for a long time to come yet.\nMorgan Stanley economists published a study this week looking at 100 years of data on how countries managed debt blowouts - defined as periods when debt/GDP ratios jumped 20 percentage points in five years.\nThey concluded that countries which managed to rein in those debt levels over the subsequent decade had kept looser monetary and fiscal policies longer than those who failed to stop their debt rising. Low debt servicing costs - absent an inflation problem - and growth were shown to be the best ways to keep debts sustainable.\nStudying all outcomes, they reckoned the most successful strategy was to keep real interest rates two percentage points below real GDP growth rates for 10 years and ‘grow out’ of the debt rather than slashing spending. Fiscal consolidation, by contrast, had played a lesser role in the reversal of public debt build-ups over the century, it said.\nOn that basis the investment bank saw U.S. real rates held between -0.5% and +0.5% for the next decade - about 2 points below their expected real GDP growth rate.\nWhile flatlining, that’s still higher than today’s rate - although it assumes some modest Fed tightening at some point.\nAnd of course, the lower the growth rate, the lower the real rate needs to be to rein in debt loads. Morgan Stanley said that if adverse demographics and productivity depressed real GDP growth more than it thought then real rates as low as today’s may have to be sustained to stop debts rising.\nBut it also said most episodes of successful debt reduction had generally been accompanied by only moderate but sustained inflation - a median of 2.9% for those successful in cutting debts. Contrary to popular perceptions, hyperinflation ensued only in a very small number of episodes.\n“Our analysis shows that the real rate environment has been key in determining the path of public debt substantially more so than actual fiscal spending.”","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":222,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":194360032,"gmtCreate":1621343459026,"gmtModify":1704356094424,"author":{"id":"3570426503709368","authorId":"3570426503709368","name":"CWei92","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/63c5dff1b0ab726006ec156ccbcb83c2","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570426503709368","authorIdStr":"3570426503709368"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"like and comment thanks","listText":"like and comment thanks","text":"like and comment thanks","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/194360032","repostId":"2135161248","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2135161248","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1621343169,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2135161248?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-05-18 21:06","market":"us","language":"en","title":"JD.com to Report Q1 Earnings: What's in the Cards?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2135161248","media":"Zacks","summary":"JD.com, Inc. is scheduled to report first-quarter 2021 results on May 19.\nFor the first quarter, the","content":"<p><b>JD.com, Inc.</b>&nbsp;is scheduled to report first-quarter 2021 results on May 19.</p>\n<p>For the first quarter, the Zacks Consensus Estimate for revenues is pegged at $29.9 billion, indicating an improvement of 44.9% from the year-ago reported figure.</p>\n<p>Further, the consensus mark for earnings is pegged at 39 cents per share, indicating a 39.3% rise from the previous-year reported figure.</p>\n<p>Notably, the company delivered an earnings surprise of 4.6% in the last reported quarter.</p>\n<p><b>JD.com, Inc. Price and EPS Surprise</b></p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c1fed1c36f6a8ce20878c0d2e594f77c\" tg-width=\"534\" tg-height=\"262\"><span>JD.com, Inc. price-eps-surprise | JD.com, Inc. Quote</span></p>\n<p><b>Key Factors to Note</b></p>\n<p>The company’s JD Retail segment, comprising the e-commerce business, is expected to have been the key catalyst in the first quarter.</p>\n<p>The launch of flagship stores of popular fashion and luxury brands like John Lobb, Stefano Ricci, Vivienne Westwoodon and Anya Hindmarch, among others, on JD.com is likely to have driven customer momentum, which in turn is expected to have aided the performance of JD Retail during the quarter-to-be-reported.</p>\n<p>JD retail’s omni-channel initiatives are anticipated to have contributed well to top-line growth of the segment in the first quarter.</p>\n<p>Moreover, the company’s collaboration with Italian luxury brands Prada and MiuMiu, which bolstered its omni-channel efforts, might have been a positive.</p>\n<p>Furthermore, growing momentum of JD health that offers free online medical consultation and online pharmacy retail services is likely to get reflected in the company’s to-be-reported quarter’s results.</p>\n<p>Growing investments in research and development are also likely to have been encouraging for the company in the quarter under review.</p>\n<p>Additionally, the new businesses segment comprising technology, supply chain and logistics services is expected to have helped it in gaining traction across lower-tier cities in the first quarter.</p>\n<p>Moreover, the well-performing Jingxi Business Group is expected to have aided JD.com’s performance in the lower-tier cities.</p>\n<p>However, increasing fulfilment, marketing, and research and development expenses are likely to have been major risks to the company’s profitability in the quarter under review.</p>\n<p>Moreover, increasing competitive pressure from Alibaba in the e-commerce market might be reflected in first-quarter results.</p>\n<p><b>What Our Model Says</b></p>\n<p>Our proven model does not conclusively predict an earnings beat for JD.com this time around. The combination of a positiveEarnings ESPand a Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy), 2 (Buy) or 3 (Hold) increases the odds of an earnings beat. But that’s not the case here. You can uncover the best stocks to buy or sell before they’re reported with ourEarnings ESP Filter.</p>\n<p>JD.com has an Earnings ESP of -14.83% and a Zacks Rank #5 (Strong Sell), at present.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>JD.com to Report Q1 Earnings: What's in the Cards?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nJD.com to Report Q1 Earnings: What's in the Cards?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-05-18 21:06 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.zacks.com/stock/news/1541348/jdcom-jd-to-report-q1-earnings-whats-in-the-cards?art_rec=quote-stock_overview-zacks_news-ID02-txt-1541348><strong>Zacks</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>JD.com, Inc. is scheduled to report first-quarter 2021 results on May 19.\nFor the first quarter, the Zacks Consensus Estimate for revenues is pegged at $29.9 billion, indicating an improvement of ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.zacks.com/stock/news/1541348/jdcom-jd-to-report-q1-earnings-whats-in-the-cards?art_rec=quote-stock_overview-zacks_news-ID02-txt-1541348\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"09618":"京东集团-SW","JD":"京东"},"source_url":"https://www.zacks.com/stock/news/1541348/jdcom-jd-to-report-q1-earnings-whats-in-the-cards?art_rec=quote-stock_overview-zacks_news-ID02-txt-1541348","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2135161248","content_text":"JD.com, Inc. is scheduled to report first-quarter 2021 results on May 19.\nFor the first quarter, the Zacks Consensus Estimate for revenues is pegged at $29.9 billion, indicating an improvement of 44.9% from the year-ago reported figure.\nFurther, the consensus mark for earnings is pegged at 39 cents per share, indicating a 39.3% rise from the previous-year reported figure.\nNotably, the company delivered an earnings surprise of 4.6% in the last reported quarter.\nJD.com, Inc. Price and EPS Surprise\nJD.com, Inc. price-eps-surprise | JD.com, Inc. Quote\nKey Factors to Note\nThe company’s JD Retail segment, comprising the e-commerce business, is expected to have been the key catalyst in the first quarter.\nThe launch of flagship stores of popular fashion and luxury brands like John Lobb, Stefano Ricci, Vivienne Westwoodon and Anya Hindmarch, among others, on JD.com is likely to have driven customer momentum, which in turn is expected to have aided the performance of JD Retail during the quarter-to-be-reported.\nJD retail’s omni-channel initiatives are anticipated to have contributed well to top-line growth of the segment in the first quarter.\nMoreover, the company’s collaboration with Italian luxury brands Prada and MiuMiu, which bolstered its omni-channel efforts, might have been a positive.\nFurthermore, growing momentum of JD health that offers free online medical consultation and online pharmacy retail services is likely to get reflected in the company’s to-be-reported quarter’s results.\nGrowing investments in research and development are also likely to have been encouraging for the company in the quarter under review.\nAdditionally, the new businesses segment comprising technology, supply chain and logistics services is expected to have helped it in gaining traction across lower-tier cities in the first quarter.\nMoreover, the well-performing Jingxi Business Group is expected to have aided JD.com’s performance in the lower-tier cities.\nHowever, increasing fulfilment, marketing, and research and development expenses are likely to have been major risks to the company’s profitability in the quarter under review.\nMoreover, increasing competitive pressure from Alibaba in the e-commerce market might be reflected in first-quarter results.\nWhat Our Model Says\nOur proven model does not conclusively predict an earnings beat for JD.com this time around. The combination of a positiveEarnings ESPand a Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy), 2 (Buy) or 3 (Hold) increases the odds of an earnings beat. But that’s not the case here. You can uncover the best stocks to buy or sell before they’re reported with ourEarnings ESP Filter.\nJD.com has an Earnings ESP of -14.83% and a Zacks Rank #5 (Strong Sell), at present.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":264,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":192923176,"gmtCreate":1621138523995,"gmtModify":1704353269480,"author":{"id":"3570426503709368","authorId":"3570426503709368","name":"CWei92","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/63c5dff1b0ab726006ec156ccbcb83c2","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570426503709368","authorIdStr":"3570426503709368"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"like and comment","listText":"like and comment","text":"like and comment","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/192923176","repostId":"1163454382","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1163454382","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1621004581,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1163454382?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-05-14 23:03","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why AMC Entertainment Stock Jumped Again Friday","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1163454382","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"AMC investors have reason for more optimism on the heels of another capital raise.Yesterday's jump came after the company announcedit raised $428 million. First, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention  issued a new statement on current health and safety protocols saying that fully vaccinated people can resume activities without wearing a mask or physically distancing, including indoors.This should allow theaters to open back up at full capacity and be a desirable destination for vaccinat","content":"<blockquote>\n <b>AMC investors have reason for more optimism on the heels of another capital raise.</b>\n</blockquote>\n<p><b>What happened</b></p>\n<p>A day after<b>AMC Entertainment Holdings</b>(NYSE:AMC)</p>\n<p><b>So what</b></p>\n<p>Yesterday's jump came after the company announcedit raised $428 million</p>\n<p>First, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) issued a new statement on current health and safety protocols saying that fully vaccinated people can resume activities without wearing a mask or physically distancing, including indoors.</p>\n<p>This should allow theaters to open back up at full capacity and be a desirable destination for vaccinated movie patrons. Also yesterday,<b>Walt Disney</b>(NYSE:DIS)announced its quarterly earnings report, and CEO Bob Chapek noted \"increased production at our studios.\" While that is a positive for theater operators, Disney also reported disappointing subscriber growth in itsstreaming services.</p>\n<p><b>Now what</b></p>\n<p>Lower streaming subscriptions could be a positive sign for the theater business. As vaccinations continue to roll out, and with the CDC now officially giving its approval to gather indoors with crowds and without masks, theater attendance may resume quickly.</p>\n<p>Vaccinations are going to drive people back to activities outside the home. Movie theaters are likely to be a favorite destination after more than a year of mostly watching at home. On the heels of another capital raise, AMC investors may be thinking this company finally has a promising path ahead.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why AMC Entertainment Stock Jumped Again Friday</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy AMC Entertainment Stock Jumped Again Friday\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-05-14 23:03 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/05/14/why-amc-entertainment-stock-jumped-again-friday/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>AMC investors have reason for more optimism on the heels of another capital raise.\n\nWhat happened\nA day afterAMC Entertainment Holdings(NYSE:AMC)\nSo what\nYesterday's jump came after the company ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/05/14/why-amc-entertainment-stock-jumped-again-friday/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AMC":"AMC院线"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/05/14/why-amc-entertainment-stock-jumped-again-friday/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1163454382","content_text":"AMC investors have reason for more optimism on the heels of another capital raise.\n\nWhat happened\nA day afterAMC Entertainment Holdings(NYSE:AMC)\nSo what\nYesterday's jump came after the company announcedit raised $428 million\nFirst, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) issued a new statement on current health and safety protocols saying that fully vaccinated people can resume activities without wearing a mask or physically distancing, including indoors.\nThis should allow theaters to open back up at full capacity and be a desirable destination for vaccinated movie patrons. Also yesterday,Walt Disney(NYSE:DIS)announced its quarterly earnings report, and CEO Bob Chapek noted \"increased production at our studios.\" While that is a positive for theater operators, Disney also reported disappointing subscriber growth in itsstreaming services.\nNow what\nLower streaming subscriptions could be a positive sign for the theater business. As vaccinations continue to roll out, and with the CDC now officially giving its approval to gather indoors with crowds and without masks, theater attendance may resume quickly.\nVaccinations are going to drive people back to activities outside the home. Movie theaters are likely to be a favorite destination after more than a year of mostly watching at home. On the heels of another capital raise, AMC investors may be thinking this company finally has a promising path ahead.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":537,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":198577679,"gmtCreate":1620976066691,"gmtModify":1704351415117,"author":{"id":"3570426503709368","authorId":"3570426503709368","name":"CWei92","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/63c5dff1b0ab726006ec156ccbcb83c2","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570426503709368","authorIdStr":"3570426503709368"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"to the moon","listText":"to the moon","text":"to the moon","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/198577679","repostId":"1118744845","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1118744845","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Stock Market Quotes, Business News, Financial News, Trading Ideas, and Stock Research by Professionals","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Benzinga","id":"1052270027","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa"},"pubTimestamp":1620975733,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1118744845?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-05-14 15:02","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Nio Grabbed 23% Share Of China's All-Electric SUV Market In April, Ahead Of Tesla's 17%","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1118744845","media":"Benzinga","summary":"Nio Inc NIO 7.31% grabbed the largest market share in China’s all-electric SUV market in April, higher than its U.S.-based rivalTesla IncTSLA 3.09%, according to China Automotive Technology and Research Center data.What Happened: Nio grabbed a 23% electric SUV share in April, compared with Tesla’s 17%, CnEVPostreported— citing the CATRC data.Nioclockeda total of 7,404 SUV sales in April — with the ES6 model selling the most at 3,302 vehicles, EC6 sales were 2,484 units and ES8 sales at 1,618 uni","content":"<p><b>Nio Inc</b>&nbsp;NIO 7.31%&nbsp;grabbed the largest market share in China’s all-electric SUV market in April, higher than its U.S.-based rival<b>Tesla Inc</b>TSLA 3.09%, according to China Automotive Technology and Research Center data.</p>\n<p><b>What Happened:</b>&nbsp;Nio grabbed a 23% electric SUV share in April, compared with Tesla’s 17%, CnEVPostreported— citing the CATRC data.</p>\n<p>Nioclockeda total of 7,404 SUV sales in April — with the ES6 model selling the most at 3,302 vehicles, EC6 sales were 2,484 units and ES8 sales at 1,618 units, the report said.&nbsp;<b>Xpeng Inc</b>XPEV 4.87%made up for 7% of the all-electric SUV market in the month.</p>\n<p>The Elon Musk-led&nbsp;Tesla sold 5,520 Model Ys in April.</p>\n<p>Tesla’s April sales of 25,845 were down 27% from March, down more than the overall EV market which saw a smaller 12% month-on-month decline. Of these Tesla shipped out 11,671 units in the country, implying that most sales in April were exports,accordingto the Wall Street Journal.</p>\n<p><b>Why It Matters:</b>&nbsp;The sales numbers come at a time when automakers are facing semiconductor shortages. Nio has already warned the shortage could hit its second-quarter sales. Nio had to halt production at its Hefei manufacturing plant for five working days starting March 29.</p>\n<p>In addition, Tesla has been facingrough weather in China,a market that contributes nearly 30% of the electric vehicle maker's global sales and is its second-largest market after the United States.</p>\n<p><b>Price Action:</b>&nbsp;Nio shares closed 7.30% lower at $31.22 on Thursday, while Tesla shares closed 3.09% lower at $571.69.</p>\n<p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Nio Grabbed 23% Share Of China's All-Electric SUV Market In April, Ahead Of Tesla's 17%</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nNio Grabbed 23% Share Of China's All-Electric SUV Market In April, Ahead Of Tesla's 17%\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Benzinga </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-05-14 15:02</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><b>Nio Inc</b>&nbsp;NIO 7.31%&nbsp;grabbed the largest market share in China’s all-electric SUV market in April, higher than its U.S.-based rival<b>Tesla Inc</b>TSLA 3.09%, according to China Automotive Technology and Research Center data.</p>\n<p><b>What Happened:</b>&nbsp;Nio grabbed a 23% electric SUV share in April, compared with Tesla’s 17%, CnEVPostreported— citing the CATRC data.</p>\n<p>Nioclockeda total of 7,404 SUV sales in April — with the ES6 model selling the most at 3,302 vehicles, EC6 sales were 2,484 units and ES8 sales at 1,618 units, the report said.&nbsp;<b>Xpeng Inc</b>XPEV 4.87%made up for 7% of the all-electric SUV market in the month.</p>\n<p>The Elon Musk-led&nbsp;Tesla sold 5,520 Model Ys in April.</p>\n<p>Tesla’s April sales of 25,845 were down 27% from March, down more than the overall EV market which saw a smaller 12% month-on-month decline. Of these Tesla shipped out 11,671 units in the country, implying that most sales in April were exports,accordingto the Wall Street Journal.</p>\n<p><b>Why It Matters:</b>&nbsp;The sales numbers come at a time when automakers are facing semiconductor shortages. Nio has already warned the shortage could hit its second-quarter sales. Nio had to halt production at its Hefei manufacturing plant for five working days starting March 29.</p>\n<p>In addition, Tesla has been facingrough weather in China,a market that contributes nearly 30% of the electric vehicle maker's global sales and is its second-largest market after the United States.</p>\n<p><b>Price Action:</b>&nbsp;Nio shares closed 7.30% lower at $31.22 on Thursday, while Tesla shares closed 3.09% lower at $571.69.</p>\n<p></p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NIO":"蔚来"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1118744845","content_text":"Nio Inc NIO 7.31% grabbed the largest market share in China’s all-electric SUV market in April, higher than its U.S.-based rivalTesla IncTSLA 3.09%, according to China Automotive Technology and Research Center data.\nWhat Happened: Nio grabbed a 23% electric SUV share in April, compared with Tesla’s 17%, CnEVPostreported— citing the CATRC data.\nNioclockeda total of 7,404 SUV sales in April — with the ES6 model selling the most at 3,302 vehicles, EC6 sales were 2,484 units and ES8 sales at 1,618 units, the report said. Xpeng IncXPEV 4.87%made up for 7% of the all-electric SUV market in the month.\nThe Elon Musk-led Tesla sold 5,520 Model Ys in April.\nTesla’s April sales of 25,845 were down 27% from March, down more than the overall EV market which saw a smaller 12% month-on-month decline. Of these Tesla shipped out 11,671 units in the country, implying that most sales in April were exports,accordingto the Wall Street Journal.\nWhy It Matters: The sales numbers come at a time when automakers are facing semiconductor shortages. Nio has already warned the shortage could hit its second-quarter sales. Nio had to halt production at its Hefei manufacturing plant for five working days starting March 29.\nIn addition, Tesla has been facingrough weather in China,a market that contributes nearly 30% of the electric vehicle maker's global sales and is its second-largest market after the United States.\nPrice Action: Nio shares closed 7.30% lower at $31.22 on Thursday, while Tesla shares closed 3.09% lower at $571.69.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":620,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":190552135,"gmtCreate":1620637228227,"gmtModify":1704345912430,"author":{"id":"3570426503709368","authorId":"3570426503709368","name":"CWei92","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/63c5dff1b0ab726006ec156ccbcb83c2","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570426503709368","authorIdStr":"3570426503709368"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"please like and comment","listText":"please like and comment","text":"please like and comment","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/190552135","repostId":"2134263864","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2134263864","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1620633000,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2134263864?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-05-10 15:50","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Panasonic forecasts profit 28% profit jump on economic rebound","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2134263864","media":"StreetInsider","summary":"TOKYO (Reuters) -     Panasonic Corp expects operating profit to jump by a almost a third this busin","content":"<p>TOKYO (Reuters) -     Panasonic Corp expects operating profit to jump by a almost a third this business year as economies worldwide rebound from coronavirus lockdown slumps, the company said on Monday.</p><p>Panasonic forecast operating profit to rise 27.6% to 330 billion yen ($3 billion) this business year. The figure is slightly higher than an average forecast of 327.56 billion  based on estimates from 16 analysts, Refinitiv data shows.</p><p>The Japanese maker of items from bicycles to hair dryers is looking to tap growing demand for electric car batteries through its decade-old partnership with Tesla Inc and is investing heavily in supply chain management services.</p><p>This business year, Panasonic plans to begin a test line in Japan to make 4,680 battery cells, a source earlier told Reuters. Tesla says such a format will halve battery costs and help ramp up battery production 100-fold by 2030.</p><p>The Japanese company is also investing heavily in new production chain management services as companies strengthen supply chains in the wake of pandemic disruptions.</p><p>Last month Panasonic Corp said it would acquire the share of U.S. supply-chain software company Blue Yonder that it does not already own, in a $7.1 billion deal, its biggest in a decade.</p><p>The U.S. company uses machine learning to help firms manage supply chains linking factories to warehouses and retailers.</p><p>For the quarter that ended March 31, the Japanese industrial conglomerate posted a fourth-quarter operating profit of 31.8 billion yen ($292.09 million), down 40% from a year ago as weaker earnings from its life solutions unit, which sells lighting, equipment and materials for buildings offset rising income from automotive components.</p><p>That result was better than an estimated average profit of 20.99 billion yen from five analysts surveyed by Refinitiv.</p>","source":"highlight_streetinsider","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Panasonic forecasts profit 28% profit jump on economic rebound</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nPanasonic forecasts profit 28% profit jump on economic rebound\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-05-10 15:50 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.streetinsider.com/dr/news.php?id=18389111><strong>StreetInsider</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>TOKYO (Reuters) -     Panasonic Corp expects operating profit to jump by a almost a third this business year as economies worldwide rebound from coronavirus lockdown slumps, the company said on Monday...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.streetinsider.com/dr/news.php?id=18389111\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"PCRFY":"松下"},"source_url":"https://www.streetinsider.com/dr/news.php?id=18389111","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2134263864","content_text":"TOKYO (Reuters) -     Panasonic Corp expects operating profit to jump by a almost a third this business year as economies worldwide rebound from coronavirus lockdown slumps, the company said on Monday.Panasonic forecast operating profit to rise 27.6% to 330 billion yen ($3 billion) this business year. The figure is slightly higher than an average forecast of 327.56 billion  based on estimates from 16 analysts, Refinitiv data shows.The Japanese maker of items from bicycles to hair dryers is looking to tap growing demand for electric car batteries through its decade-old partnership with Tesla Inc and is investing heavily in supply chain management services.This business year, Panasonic plans to begin a test line in Japan to make 4,680 battery cells, a source earlier told Reuters. Tesla says such a format will halve battery costs and help ramp up battery production 100-fold by 2030.The Japanese company is also investing heavily in new production chain management services as companies strengthen supply chains in the wake of pandemic disruptions.Last month Panasonic Corp said it would acquire the share of U.S. supply-chain software company Blue Yonder that it does not already own, in a $7.1 billion deal, its biggest in a decade.The U.S. company uses machine learning to help firms manage supply chains linking factories to warehouses and retailers.For the quarter that ended March 31, the Japanese industrial conglomerate posted a fourth-quarter operating profit of 31.8 billion yen ($292.09 million), down 40% from a year ago as weaker earnings from its life solutions unit, which sells lighting, equipment and materials for buildings offset rising income from automotive components.That result was better than an estimated average profit of 20.99 billion yen from five analysts surveyed by Refinitiv.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":367,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":170156102,"gmtCreate":1626414796006,"gmtModify":1703759716969,"author":{"id":"3570426503709368","authorId":"3570426503709368","name":"CWei92","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/63c5dff1b0ab726006ec156ccbcb83c2","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570426503709368","authorIdStr":"3570426503709368"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"good","listText":"good","text":"good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/170156102","repostId":"1124361019","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1124361019","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1626413039,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1124361019?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-16 13:23","market":"us","language":"en","title":"'Boring '20s'? - a decade of zero real rates :Mike Dolan","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1124361019","media":"Reuters","summary":"(The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters.)\nLONDON, July 16 (Reu","content":"<p>(The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters.)</p>\n<p>LONDON, July 16 (Reuters) - The U.S. government can once again borrow at a deeply negative ‘real’ rate of minus 1.0% for 10 years - and some economists insist there’s a powerful historical case for expecting that rate to stay near zero or below for the rest of the decade.</p>\n<p>It’s been fashionable in markets of late to think of another “Roaring ‘20s” emerging over the next decade. Pandemic-driven megatrends, fractious politics, gigantic government debt piles and the return of inflation could all conspire to electrify or unnerve markets over the years ahead - or so the story goes.</p>\n<p>But after a restive first quarter of 2021, global bond markets - still under the spell of heavy central bank buying - appear to be pricing in a very different scenario ahead.</p>\n<p>Even after this week’s June readout of the highest annual gain in U.S. core consumer prices in 30 years - an inflation rate of some 4.5% excluding food and energy prices - the yield on the Treasury’s 10-year inflation-protected bond skidded back below -1.0% for the first time in five months.</p>\n<p>Aside from that brief moment in February, these rates have never been lower - at least not in the history of these securities. And all equivalent rates in the G4 major economies are also below zero, with Germany and Britain even lower than those in the United States.</p>\n<p>Investors pore over everything from ‘peak inflation’ to ‘peak growth’ and even ‘peak stimulus’ for clues as to why bond yields continue to defy forecasts and why they have taken the surge in inflation and government debt levels in their stride.</p>\n<p>U.S. government debt will top 125% of gross domestic product this year and next - its highest since World War Two - and up almost 20 percentage points since before the pandemic. Debt/GDP in G4 economies overall has risen by a similar amount to 125%.</p>\n<p>While many put the seeming nonchalance down to persistent central bank intervention or technical quirks, some also point out to the risk of a weakening ‘fiscal impulse’ over the next two years that mathematically drags on growth rates.</p>\n<p>Manulife Investment Management economist Frances Donald thinks this should be seen as a “fiscal cliff” and the drop in U.S. spending - viewed as a share of resulting falling budget deficit - marks the steepest such cliff since the 1940s.</p>\n<p><b>HIGH PRESSURE</b></p>\n<p>However, G7 leaders pledged last month not to make the mistakes of the last crisis by reducing government spending too soon and reverting to fiscal austerity too early.</p>\n<p>The White House and congressional Democrats at least seem intent on keeping that “high pressure economy” until all sections of society take part. Leading Democrats this week agreed to table another $3.5 trillion investment plan on top of the proposed $600 billion of infrastructure spending already in the pipeline.</p>\n<p>And yet the bond market barely flickered at the prospect.</p>\n<p>Is this just the Federal Reserve’s hand? Is Fed buying really so dominant and can it remain so for years?</p>\n<p>Fed chief Jerome Powell was this week pointedly reluctant to give Congress any hard timeline for a reduction in bond buying and continued to characterize inflation spikes as mostly temporary base effects and bottlenecks from pandemic lockdowns.</p>\n<p>But if the Fed is right about inflation over time and the pursuit of a high pressure economy is now G7 consensus due to equality and climate priorities, history shows bond yields could be down here for a long time to come yet.</p>\n<p>Morgan Stanley economists published a study this week looking at 100 years of data on how countries managed debt blowouts - defined as periods when debt/GDP ratios jumped 20 percentage points in five years.</p>\n<p>They concluded that countries which managed to rein in those debt levels over the subsequent decade had kept looser monetary and fiscal policies longer than those who failed to stop their debt rising. Low debt servicing costs - absent an inflation problem - and growth were shown to be the best ways to keep debts sustainable.</p>\n<p>Studying all outcomes, they reckoned the most successful strategy was to keep real interest rates two percentage points below real GDP growth rates for 10 years and ‘grow out’ of the debt rather than slashing spending. Fiscal consolidation, by contrast, had played a lesser role in the reversal of public debt build-ups over the century, it said.</p>\n<p>On that basis the investment bank saw U.S. real rates held between -0.5% and +0.5% for the next decade - about 2 points below their expected real GDP growth rate.</p>\n<p>While flatlining, that’s still higher than today’s rate - although it assumes some modest Fed tightening at some point.</p>\n<p>And of course, the lower the growth rate, the lower the real rate needs to be to rein in debt loads. Morgan Stanley said that if adverse demographics and productivity depressed real GDP growth more than it thought then real rates as low as today’s may have to be sustained to stop debts rising.</p>\n<p>But it also said most episodes of successful debt reduction had generally been accompanied by only moderate but sustained inflation - a median of 2.9% for those successful in cutting debts. Contrary to popular perceptions, hyperinflation ensued only in a very small number of episodes.</p>\n<p>“Our analysis shows that the real rate environment has been key in determining the path of public debt substantially more so than actual fiscal spending.”</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>'Boring '20s'? - a decade of zero real rates :Mike Dolan</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n'Boring '20s'? - a decade of zero real rates :Mike Dolan\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-07-16 13:23</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>(The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters.)</p>\n<p>LONDON, July 16 (Reuters) - The U.S. government can once again borrow at a deeply negative ‘real’ rate of minus 1.0% for 10 years - and some economists insist there’s a powerful historical case for expecting that rate to stay near zero or below for the rest of the decade.</p>\n<p>It’s been fashionable in markets of late to think of another “Roaring ‘20s” emerging over the next decade. Pandemic-driven megatrends, fractious politics, gigantic government debt piles and the return of inflation could all conspire to electrify or unnerve markets over the years ahead - or so the story goes.</p>\n<p>But after a restive first quarter of 2021, global bond markets - still under the spell of heavy central bank buying - appear to be pricing in a very different scenario ahead.</p>\n<p>Even after this week’s June readout of the highest annual gain in U.S. core consumer prices in 30 years - an inflation rate of some 4.5% excluding food and energy prices - the yield on the Treasury’s 10-year inflation-protected bond skidded back below -1.0% for the first time in five months.</p>\n<p>Aside from that brief moment in February, these rates have never been lower - at least not in the history of these securities. And all equivalent rates in the G4 major economies are also below zero, with Germany and Britain even lower than those in the United States.</p>\n<p>Investors pore over everything from ‘peak inflation’ to ‘peak growth’ and even ‘peak stimulus’ for clues as to why bond yields continue to defy forecasts and why they have taken the surge in inflation and government debt levels in their stride.</p>\n<p>U.S. government debt will top 125% of gross domestic product this year and next - its highest since World War Two - and up almost 20 percentage points since before the pandemic. Debt/GDP in G4 economies overall has risen by a similar amount to 125%.</p>\n<p>While many put the seeming nonchalance down to persistent central bank intervention or technical quirks, some also point out to the risk of a weakening ‘fiscal impulse’ over the next two years that mathematically drags on growth rates.</p>\n<p>Manulife Investment Management economist Frances Donald thinks this should be seen as a “fiscal cliff” and the drop in U.S. spending - viewed as a share of resulting falling budget deficit - marks the steepest such cliff since the 1940s.</p>\n<p><b>HIGH PRESSURE</b></p>\n<p>However, G7 leaders pledged last month not to make the mistakes of the last crisis by reducing government spending too soon and reverting to fiscal austerity too early.</p>\n<p>The White House and congressional Democrats at least seem intent on keeping that “high pressure economy” until all sections of society take part. Leading Democrats this week agreed to table another $3.5 trillion investment plan on top of the proposed $600 billion of infrastructure spending already in the pipeline.</p>\n<p>And yet the bond market barely flickered at the prospect.</p>\n<p>Is this just the Federal Reserve’s hand? Is Fed buying really so dominant and can it remain so for years?</p>\n<p>Fed chief Jerome Powell was this week pointedly reluctant to give Congress any hard timeline for a reduction in bond buying and continued to characterize inflation spikes as mostly temporary base effects and bottlenecks from pandemic lockdowns.</p>\n<p>But if the Fed is right about inflation over time and the pursuit of a high pressure economy is now G7 consensus due to equality and climate priorities, history shows bond yields could be down here for a long time to come yet.</p>\n<p>Morgan Stanley economists published a study this week looking at 100 years of data on how countries managed debt blowouts - defined as periods when debt/GDP ratios jumped 20 percentage points in five years.</p>\n<p>They concluded that countries which managed to rein in those debt levels over the subsequent decade had kept looser monetary and fiscal policies longer than those who failed to stop their debt rising. Low debt servicing costs - absent an inflation problem - and growth were shown to be the best ways to keep debts sustainable.</p>\n<p>Studying all outcomes, they reckoned the most successful strategy was to keep real interest rates two percentage points below real GDP growth rates for 10 years and ‘grow out’ of the debt rather than slashing spending. Fiscal consolidation, by contrast, had played a lesser role in the reversal of public debt build-ups over the century, it said.</p>\n<p>On that basis the investment bank saw U.S. real rates held between -0.5% and +0.5% for the next decade - about 2 points below their expected real GDP growth rate.</p>\n<p>While flatlining, that’s still higher than today’s rate - although it assumes some modest Fed tightening at some point.</p>\n<p>And of course, the lower the growth rate, the lower the real rate needs to be to rein in debt loads. Morgan Stanley said that if adverse demographics and productivity depressed real GDP growth more than it thought then real rates as low as today’s may have to be sustained to stop debts rising.</p>\n<p>But it also said most episodes of successful debt reduction had generally been accompanied by only moderate but sustained inflation - a median of 2.9% for those successful in cutting debts. Contrary to popular perceptions, hyperinflation ensued only in a very small number of episodes.</p>\n<p>“Our analysis shows that the real rate environment has been key in determining the path of public debt substantially more so than actual fiscal spending.”</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SPY":"标普500ETF",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1124361019","content_text":"(The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters.)\nLONDON, July 16 (Reuters) - The U.S. government can once again borrow at a deeply negative ‘real’ rate of minus 1.0% for 10 years - and some economists insist there’s a powerful historical case for expecting that rate to stay near zero or below for the rest of the decade.\nIt’s been fashionable in markets of late to think of another “Roaring ‘20s” emerging over the next decade. Pandemic-driven megatrends, fractious politics, gigantic government debt piles and the return of inflation could all conspire to electrify or unnerve markets over the years ahead - or so the story goes.\nBut after a restive first quarter of 2021, global bond markets - still under the spell of heavy central bank buying - appear to be pricing in a very different scenario ahead.\nEven after this week’s June readout of the highest annual gain in U.S. core consumer prices in 30 years - an inflation rate of some 4.5% excluding food and energy prices - the yield on the Treasury’s 10-year inflation-protected bond skidded back below -1.0% for the first time in five months.\nAside from that brief moment in February, these rates have never been lower - at least not in the history of these securities. And all equivalent rates in the G4 major economies are also below zero, with Germany and Britain even lower than those in the United States.\nInvestors pore over everything from ‘peak inflation’ to ‘peak growth’ and even ‘peak stimulus’ for clues as to why bond yields continue to defy forecasts and why they have taken the surge in inflation and government debt levels in their stride.\nU.S. government debt will top 125% of gross domestic product this year and next - its highest since World War Two - and up almost 20 percentage points since before the pandemic. Debt/GDP in G4 economies overall has risen by a similar amount to 125%.\nWhile many put the seeming nonchalance down to persistent central bank intervention or technical quirks, some also point out to the risk of a weakening ‘fiscal impulse’ over the next two years that mathematically drags on growth rates.\nManulife Investment Management economist Frances Donald thinks this should be seen as a “fiscal cliff” and the drop in U.S. spending - viewed as a share of resulting falling budget deficit - marks the steepest such cliff since the 1940s.\nHIGH PRESSURE\nHowever, G7 leaders pledged last month not to make the mistakes of the last crisis by reducing government spending too soon and reverting to fiscal austerity too early.\nThe White House and congressional Democrats at least seem intent on keeping that “high pressure economy” until all sections of society take part. Leading Democrats this week agreed to table another $3.5 trillion investment plan on top of the proposed $600 billion of infrastructure spending already in the pipeline.\nAnd yet the bond market barely flickered at the prospect.\nIs this just the Federal Reserve’s hand? Is Fed buying really so dominant and can it remain so for years?\nFed chief Jerome Powell was this week pointedly reluctant to give Congress any hard timeline for a reduction in bond buying and continued to characterize inflation spikes as mostly temporary base effects and bottlenecks from pandemic lockdowns.\nBut if the Fed is right about inflation over time and the pursuit of a high pressure economy is now G7 consensus due to equality and climate priorities, history shows bond yields could be down here for a long time to come yet.\nMorgan Stanley economists published a study this week looking at 100 years of data on how countries managed debt blowouts - defined as periods when debt/GDP ratios jumped 20 percentage points in five years.\nThey concluded that countries which managed to rein in those debt levels over the subsequent decade had kept looser monetary and fiscal policies longer than those who failed to stop their debt rising. Low debt servicing costs - absent an inflation problem - and growth were shown to be the best ways to keep debts sustainable.\nStudying all outcomes, they reckoned the most successful strategy was to keep real interest rates two percentage points below real GDP growth rates for 10 years and ‘grow out’ of the debt rather than slashing spending. Fiscal consolidation, by contrast, had played a lesser role in the reversal of public debt build-ups over the century, it said.\nOn that basis the investment bank saw U.S. real rates held between -0.5% and +0.5% for the next decade - about 2 points below their expected real GDP growth rate.\nWhile flatlining, that’s still higher than today’s rate - although it assumes some modest Fed tightening at some point.\nAnd of course, the lower the growth rate, the lower the real rate needs to be to rein in debt loads. Morgan Stanley said that if adverse demographics and productivity depressed real GDP growth more than it thought then real rates as low as today’s may have to be sustained to stop debts rising.\nBut it also said most episodes of successful debt reduction had generally been accompanied by only moderate but sustained inflation - a median of 2.9% for those successful in cutting debts. Contrary to popular perceptions, hyperinflation ensued only in a very small number of episodes.\n“Our analysis shows that the real rate environment has been key in determining the path of public debt substantially more so than actual fiscal spending.”","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":223,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":118015190,"gmtCreate":1622707726410,"gmtModify":1704189332018,"author":{"id":"3570426503709368","authorId":"3570426503709368","name":"CWei92","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/63c5dff1b0ab726006ec156ccbcb83c2","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570426503709368","authorIdStr":"3570426503709368"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[Cool]&nbsp;[Cool]&nbsp;[Cool]&nbsp;","listText":"[Cool]&nbsp;[Cool]&nbsp;[Cool]&nbsp;","text":"[Cool] [Cool] [Cool]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/118015190","repostId":"1160407593","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1160407593","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1622706069,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1160407593?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-03 15:41","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Is Apple Stock Overvalued?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1160407593","media":"seekingalpha","summary":"Despite crushing Q2 earnings estimates, Apple shares have gone in reverse and are underperforming the broader market.I believe Wall Street expectations for Apple's FY2022 are unreasonably high and likely contributing to the recent weakness.Apple's Price/Earnings, Price/Sales, and Price/Free Cash flow still remain significantly elevated to historical levels.I have serious doubt that iPhone, iPad, and Mac sales can continue the current hot sales pace over the next year.Apple  bulls have to be frus","content":"<p><b>Summary</b></p>\n<ul>\n <li>Despite crushing Q2 earnings estimates, Apple shares have gone in reverse and are underperforming the broader market.</li>\n <li>I believe Wall Street expectations for Apple's FY2022 are unreasonably high and likely contributing to the recent weakness.</li>\n <li>Apple's Price/Earnings, Price/Sales, and Price/Free Cash flow still remain&nbsp;significantly elevated&nbsp;to historical levels.</li>\n <li>I have serious doubt that iPhone, iPad, and Mac sales can continue the current hot sales pace over the next year.</li>\n</ul>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bff81a333ee2ce5596e83df474ea7f56\" tg-width=\"768\" tg-height=\"511\"><span>Photo by PeskyMonkey/iStock Editorial via Getty Images</span></p>\n<p>Apple (AAPL) bulls have to be frustrated. Despite massive earnings beats in both its&nbsp;Q1 holiday quarter&nbsp;and&nbsp;Q2 January-March quarter, the shares have gone no where. The&nbsp;thesis from my last article&nbsp;on Apple, that COVID-19 lockdowns, government handouts, and the launch of 5G all culminated to pull demand into Apple's FY21 year,gained a supporter from analysts at New Street, who are now predicting the same.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1e41696d20058f8ca97f59715bca52b8\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"405\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>New Street isn't predicting that the sky is falling, and neither am I. They are just modeling<i>iPhone shipments in the 180M-200M range versus the 234M consensus.</i>Does this sound like an extreme view? I don't think it is, especially since SA Contributor Paulo Santos has been&nbsp;tracking iPhone sales in China&nbsp;and has seen a significant slowdown from the white-hot start to the beginning of this year. I think similar slowdowns for iPad and Mac are a few quarters away.</p>\n<p><b>What is AAPL's current valuation? Does it make sense?</b></p>\n<p>From the comments I've received on my last two articles, bulls must think I hate Apple and have an axe to grind. This could not be further from the truth. I've owned Apple outright many times in the past, and still own a significant stake in it through my Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.B) holdings. So I'm not rooting against it by any stretch, I'm just calling it like I see it - and I see the valuation as very stretched.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/242125db79bcaf3f8697bf4466c3f0c8\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"464\"><span>Data by YCharts</span></p>\n<p>Apple's Price/Earnings, Price/Sales, and Price/Free Cash flow still remain&nbsp;<b>significantly elevated</b>- 50% or more - from their historic norms.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2397347f029ba2ba682fa1398109d5e7\" tg-width=\"584\" tg-height=\"160\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>This is a key issue because the forward revenue growth and earnings estimates for Apple are already low and predict minimal growth. At these rates, nearly all of the earnings growth would come from the share repurchases.</p>\n<p>But these forward estimates assume Apple will repeat the record year they are having again in FY2022. I think the odds of that happening are slim. Instead, I expect a similar situation of what happened between FY2014-FY2016, where operating earnings increased significantly from FY2014 to FY2015, then declined moderately in FY2016.</p>\n<p><b>Apple's FY21 could be peak sales and earnings for a long time</b></p>\n<p>Since 2016, Apple has introduced a lot of successful new products: the Apple Watch, AirPods, and Apple TV, to go along with many new versions of Mac, iPhone, and iPad, along with impressive growth in Services.</p>\n<p>Yet with all of that success, Apple's Operating Income peaked in 2015 until shattering the prior peak over the last 12 months. From 2015-2020, Apple was able to grow EPS roughly 7%, with significant help from share repurchases and the TCJA corporate income tax cut. (Without this tax cut, 2020 EPS would have been ~$2.88 rather than $3.28, implying an EPS growth rate of around 4.5%.)</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3a878730fc1ed62d2dc0166d9aa16c21\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"279\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>Ultimately, I believe Apple's recent torrid sales performance will not be repeated and should not be considered a new run rate like Wall Street analysts are modeling. I look at iPad sales as an illustration of this. For the last several years, volumes had been steady until exploding 57% last year and continuing the same strength early this year.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/11c5c505d2f2c147fc7ee546576a5945\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"582\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>Did iPads suddenly become so much more popular? Or were there just a lot of parents working from home that wanted iPads for their kids? I'm going with the latter.</p>\n<p><b>Conclusion - Apple is still a Sell</b></p>\n<p>Wall St. analysts wasted no time increasing earnings expectations for next year based on what I believe is mostly an extrapolation of the current results.</p>\n<p>Admittedly, I'm less bullish on the 5G Supercycle than most. I believe that the innovators and early adopters will rush to upgrade, but most of the mass market will remain on the normal upgrade cadence, which continues to lengthen. I think the iPhone is a victim of its own success - that the recent iPhones are all so good, upgrading to newer phones is less compelling, and because 4G is \"good enough\" for most people.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3a5047edb2490f12fb4259f905c7fbac\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"305\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>Apple earned $2.97 in 2019. They've already earned $3.08 in the first two quarters of this year and current estimates are $5.16 for the full fiscal. Even with the growth in Services, I just do not see them repeating this performance next fiscal year, and expect earnings closer to the $4-4.50/share range, far short of the $5.30 that's currently expected. That would put Price/Earnings back above 30 with a negative growth rate. If this happens, shares could retest the $100 level.</p>\n<p>Apple is still a sell here for me. It's a great company that's simply priced too richly. Valuation always matters.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Is Apple Stock Overvalued?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nIs Apple Stock Overvalued?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-06-03 15:41 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4432646-apple-stock-overvalued><strong>seekingalpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Summary\n\nDespite crushing Q2 earnings estimates, Apple shares have gone in reverse and are underperforming the broader market.\nI believe Wall Street expectations for Apple's FY2022 are unreasonably ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4432646-apple-stock-overvalued\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4432646-apple-stock-overvalued","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1160407593","content_text":"Summary\n\nDespite crushing Q2 earnings estimates, Apple shares have gone in reverse and are underperforming the broader market.\nI believe Wall Street expectations for Apple's FY2022 are unreasonably high and likely contributing to the recent weakness.\nApple's Price/Earnings, Price/Sales, and Price/Free Cash flow still remain significantly elevated to historical levels.\nI have serious doubt that iPhone, iPad, and Mac sales can continue the current hot sales pace over the next year.\n\nPhoto by PeskyMonkey/iStock Editorial via Getty Images\nApple (AAPL) bulls have to be frustrated. Despite massive earnings beats in both its Q1 holiday quarter and Q2 January-March quarter, the shares have gone no where. The thesis from my last article on Apple, that COVID-19 lockdowns, government handouts, and the launch of 5G all culminated to pull demand into Apple's FY21 year,gained a supporter from analysts at New Street, who are now predicting the same.\n\nNew Street isn't predicting that the sky is falling, and neither am I. They are just modelingiPhone shipments in the 180M-200M range versus the 234M consensus.Does this sound like an extreme view? I don't think it is, especially since SA Contributor Paulo Santos has been tracking iPhone sales in China and has seen a significant slowdown from the white-hot start to the beginning of this year. I think similar slowdowns for iPad and Mac are a few quarters away.\nWhat is AAPL's current valuation? Does it make sense?\nFrom the comments I've received on my last two articles, bulls must think I hate Apple and have an axe to grind. This could not be further from the truth. I've owned Apple outright many times in the past, and still own a significant stake in it through my Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.B) holdings. So I'm not rooting against it by any stretch, I'm just calling it like I see it - and I see the valuation as very stretched.\nData by YCharts\nApple's Price/Earnings, Price/Sales, and Price/Free Cash flow still remain significantly elevated- 50% or more - from their historic norms.\n\nThis is a key issue because the forward revenue growth and earnings estimates for Apple are already low and predict minimal growth. At these rates, nearly all of the earnings growth would come from the share repurchases.\nBut these forward estimates assume Apple will repeat the record year they are having again in FY2022. I think the odds of that happening are slim. Instead, I expect a similar situation of what happened between FY2014-FY2016, where operating earnings increased significantly from FY2014 to FY2015, then declined moderately in FY2016.\nApple's FY21 could be peak sales and earnings for a long time\nSince 2016, Apple has introduced a lot of successful new products: the Apple Watch, AirPods, and Apple TV, to go along with many new versions of Mac, iPhone, and iPad, along with impressive growth in Services.\nYet with all of that success, Apple's Operating Income peaked in 2015 until shattering the prior peak over the last 12 months. From 2015-2020, Apple was able to grow EPS roughly 7%, with significant help from share repurchases and the TCJA corporate income tax cut. (Without this tax cut, 2020 EPS would have been ~$2.88 rather than $3.28, implying an EPS growth rate of around 4.5%.)\n\nUltimately, I believe Apple's recent torrid sales performance will not be repeated and should not be considered a new run rate like Wall Street analysts are modeling. I look at iPad sales as an illustration of this. For the last several years, volumes had been steady until exploding 57% last year and continuing the same strength early this year.\n\nDid iPads suddenly become so much more popular? Or were there just a lot of parents working from home that wanted iPads for their kids? I'm going with the latter.\nConclusion - Apple is still a Sell\nWall St. analysts wasted no time increasing earnings expectations for next year based on what I believe is mostly an extrapolation of the current results.\nAdmittedly, I'm less bullish on the 5G Supercycle than most. I believe that the innovators and early adopters will rush to upgrade, but most of the mass market will remain on the normal upgrade cadence, which continues to lengthen. I think the iPhone is a victim of its own success - that the recent iPhones are all so good, upgrading to newer phones is less compelling, and because 4G is \"good enough\" for most people.\n\nApple earned $2.97 in 2019. They've already earned $3.08 in the first two quarters of this year and current estimates are $5.16 for the full fiscal. Even with the growth in Services, I just do not see them repeating this performance next fiscal year, and expect earnings closer to the $4-4.50/share range, far short of the $5.30 that's currently expected. That would put Price/Earnings back above 30 with a negative growth rate. If this happens, shares could retest the $100 level.\nApple is still a sell here for me. It's a great company that's simply priced too richly. Valuation always matters.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":222,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":372921629,"gmtCreate":1619169619261,"gmtModify":1704720715177,"author":{"id":"3570426503709368","authorId":"3570426503709368","name":"CWei92","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/63c5dff1b0ab726006ec156ccbcb83c2","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570426503709368","authorIdStr":"3570426503709368"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"how is today marjet","listText":"how is today marjet","text":"how is today marjet","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/372921629","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":307,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}