Vanillin personal page - To The Moon

Vanillin

Vanillin

No personal profile

14Follow

13Followers

0Topic

0Badge

2021-07-18

Netflix content is way better than Disney+. I had Disney+ for 3 months and got bored watching it. NetFlix’s content is a lot more diverse and caters for a wider audience. Big plus for me, they have excellent Korean dramas. The secret sauce will be its foray into gaming on-demand. Looking forward to it.

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2021-09-02

I hope he gets to keep his job.. and we will have some good bargains

Citi's Levkovich Admits "Significant" Mistakes In Bearish S&P Call, But Sticks With 4,000 Year-End Target

2022-05-20

I think there's room to correct

Tesla Slid Nearly 6% in Morning Trading and Reached an Eight-Month Low at $665.64

2022-01-07

Buying into SPACS is like throwing darts.. hopefully strike some good ones but some land on your toes. (GRAB), and that hurt 😞

Singapore SPAC Vertex Technology set for local listing on Jan 21 - source

2021-08-31

Apple services should play important role in AAPL future. I still haven’t able to see how it can effectively take on the likes of Spotify and Netflix. This is a case of a elephant in the room.

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2022-01-24

Netflix is still considered a big tech by any means. It's at least making money joining the ranks of the likes AAPL, GOOG, MSFT & META

Thinking of Selling Netflix? 2 Things to Remember

2022-01-18

sigh…[Put]

Hot Chinese ADRs Slid in Premarket Trading

2022-01-13

Diamond hand.. I like Zoom, it they need to be more aggressive in their investment strategy. PLTR too secretive a company, and CEO cares little on building shareholders’ interest.

Cathie Wood Sells Another $3M Shares In Tesla On Wednesday — Here's What She Bought Instead

2022-10-05

com i think 💭

Google to Build South African Cloud in $1 Billion Africa Plan

2022-05-17

I think Netflix is still a clear leader in video streaming but it has become a blood bath with ever demand for new content. It will be interesting to see Hastings move into gaming. For now, Im still a skeptic.

Netflix: A Series Of Red Flags

Go to Tiger App to see more news

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"userPageInfo":{"id":"3572310408162611","uuid":"3572310408162611","gmtCreate":1609216498392,"gmtModify":1756359557018,"name":"Vanillin","pinyin":"vanillin","introduction":"","introductionEn":"","signature":"","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/42bb976aee4ad7669c027cd08d6aee51","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":13,"headSize":14,"tweetSize":0,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":1,"name":"萌萌虎","nameTw":"萌萌虎","represent":"呱呱坠地","factor":"评论帖子3次或发布1条主帖（非转发）","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":"success","userBadges":[{"badgeId":"44212b71d0be4ec88898348dbe882e03-3","templateUuid":"44212b71d0be4ec88898348dbe882e03","name":"President Tiger","description":"The transaction amount of the securities account reaches $1,000,000","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fbeac6bb240db7da8b972e5183d050ba","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/436cdf80292b99f0a992e78750ac4e3a","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/506a259a7b456f037592c3b23c779599","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2025.11.18","exceedPercentage":"93.47%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1101},{"badgeId":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493-3","templateUuid":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493","name":" Tiger Idol","description":"Join the tiger community for 1500 days","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8b40ae7da5bf081a1c84df14bf9e6367","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f160eceddd7c284a8e1136557615cfad","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/11792805c468334a9b31c39f95a41c6a","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2025.02.07","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be-3","templateUuid":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be","name":"Legendary Trader","description":"Total number of securities or futures transactions reached 300","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/656db16598a0b8f21429e10d6c1cb033","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/03f10910d4dd9234f9b5702a3342193a","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0c767e35268feb729d50d3fa9a386c5a","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.01.24","exceedPercentage":"93.16%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100},{"badgeId":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789-1","templateUuid":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789","name":"Knowledgeable Investor","description":"Traded more than 10 stocks","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e74cc24115c4fbae6154ec1b1041bf47","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d48265cbfd97c57f9048db29f22227b0","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76c6d6898b073c77e1c537ebe9ac1c57","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1102},{"badgeId":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84-1","templateUuid":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84","name":"Real Trader","description":"Completed a transaction","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":5,"currentWearingBadge":{"badgeId":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493-2","templateUuid":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493","name":"Senior Tiger","description":"Join the tiger community for 1000 days","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0063fb68ea29c9ae6858c58630e182d5","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/96c699a93be4214d4b49aea6a5a5d1a4","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/35b0e542a9ff77046ed69ef602bc105d","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":1,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.09.26","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":null,"starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":6,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"hot","tweets":[{"id":9915351216,"gmtCreate":1664967584335,"gmtModify":1676537536872,"author":{"id":"3572310408162611","authorId":"3572310408162611","name":"Vanillin","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/42bb976aee4ad7669c027cd08d6aee51","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3572310408162611","authorIdStr":"3572310408162611"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"com i think 💭&nbsp;","listText":"com i think 💭&nbsp;","text":"com i think 💭","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9915351216","repostId":"1177866087","repostType":2,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2949,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9021284103,"gmtCreate":1653059927502,"gmtModify":1676535216682,"author":{"id":"3572310408162611","authorId":"3572310408162611","name":"Vanillin","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/42bb976aee4ad7669c027cd08d6aee51","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3572310408162611","authorIdStr":"3572310408162611"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"I think there's room to correct","listText":"I think there's room to correct","text":"I think there's room to correct","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9021284103","repostId":"1171691690","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1171691690","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1653058984,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1171691690?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-05-20 23:03","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Tesla Slid Nearly 6% in Morning Trading and Reached an Eight-Month Low at $665.64","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1171691690","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Tesla slid nearly 6% in morning trading and reached an eight-month low at $665.64.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Tesla slid nearly 6% in morning trading and reached an eight-month low at $665.64.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8ba4ef15240181df846507f881087aee\" tg-width=\"769\" tg-height=\"566\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Tesla Slid Nearly 6% in Morning Trading and Reached an Eight-Month Low at $665.64</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTesla Slid Nearly 6% in Morning Trading and Reached an Eight-Month Low at $665.64\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-05-20 23:03</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>Tesla slid nearly 6% in morning trading and reached an eight-month low at $665.64.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8ba4ef15240181df846507f881087aee\" tg-width=\"769\" tg-height=\"566\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1171691690","content_text":"Tesla slid nearly 6% in morning trading and reached an eight-month low at $665.64.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"TSLA":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2873,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9029282074,"gmtCreate":1652787187098,"gmtModify":1676535161011,"author":{"id":"3572310408162611","authorId":"3572310408162611","name":"Vanillin","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/42bb976aee4ad7669c027cd08d6aee51","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3572310408162611","authorIdStr":"3572310408162611"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"I think Netflix is still a clear leader in video streaming but it has become a blood bath with ever demand for new content. It will be interesting to see Hastings move into gaming. For now, Im still a skeptic.&nbsp;","listText":"I think Netflix is still a clear leader in video streaming but it has become a blood bath with ever demand for new content. It will be interesting to see Hastings move into gaming. For now, Im still a skeptic.&nbsp;","text":"I think Netflix is still a clear leader in video streaming but it has become a blood bath with ever demand for new content. It will be interesting to see Hastings move into gaming. For now, Im still a skeptic.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9029282074","repostId":"2236212001","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2236212001","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1652785520,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2236212001?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-05-17 19:05","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Netflix: A Series Of Red Flags","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2236212001","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"Overview(Source: Google)After Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX) reported its Q1’22 results, the share price tumb","content":"<html><head></head><body><h2>Overview</h2><p></p><p><img src=\"https://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2022/5/10/saupload_fsCLTHKVDI04imUamEwp5f2aYtPoJKtSfK8jQ3EYdONi9f8fMjYfsgVh6P9zF1NaGTDljs9if5JhrVI7kOAjvF_V7LIVZnfYxY6KnI07cu_fEsAWJJ7mCLaz0d3fAvBwo-luaxzlGOMOkKKzsA_thumb1.png\" tg-width=\"1280\" tg-height=\"979\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>(Source: Google)</p><p>After Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX) reported its Q1’22 results, the share price tumbled 37%. You might ask, what exactly had happened to warrant such pessimism and drastic drawdown?</p><p>Well, you’ve come to the right place. Here&#39;s what we are going to be covering today in this article.</p><h2>Headwinds: Economies Reopening and Competition Intensifying</h2><p>2020 and 2021 were massive years for Netflix as there was an acceleration in the adoption of digital streaming services. However, as the pandemic severity starts to wind down, and people start to spend more time outside, the elevated demand will be reduced to more normalized levels.</p><p>Competition in the industry is also heating up with the influx of streaming services such as Disney+, Hulu, Apple TV+, HBO Max, and Amazon Prime.</p><p>This means that users today are spoilt for choice. Companies that fall short of consumers’ expectations, such as the lack of quality content, will find it more challenging to retain these users. The ever-increasing inflation rate has also significantly reduced consumers’ purchasing power, and they are likely to stick with a few core services that are able to attend to their needs. Reports by The Guardian and iMore showed that Apple TV+ and Disney+ have seen huge churn while categorizing Amazon Prime and Netflix as “must-haves”.</p><p>However, this is not the time to be complacent just yet.</p><p>Companies like Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) and Amazon (NASDAQ:AMZN) have a highly competitive edge over Netflix as they possess highly profitable core businesses financing their investments in curating more content. This puts pressure on Netflix&#39;s ability to invest and compete for the long-term while also focus on profitability at the same time.</p><h2>Growth Deceleration</h2><p></p><p><img src=\"https://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2022/5/10/saupload_le5yZpvn0WLNHgDWstkN9_OnNUxsmhzxJcie2yKls1oVq1ooeh9PJfoes5P-R139BCx3dBk4ictumjsNmUMkn8EDzqOGQvyOniHfMl-mH2RVAh1r95d4-Xie60fPEICE75LOWjl-v4UV0yLg3g_thumb1.png\" tg-width=\"1280\" tg-height=\"604\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>(Source: Netflix Investor Relations)</p><p></p><p>As soon as Netflix reported its Q1’22 quarterly results, all eyes were on its revenue growth and subscriber count. Subscribers are important as costs can be spread over a larger base, and that contributes to the bottom line.</p><p>However, the results were shocking, to say the least.</p><p>Instead of reporting 2.5 million new subscribers as guided in Q4’21, the company reported a loss of 200,000 subscribers, making it the first decline in a decade. As a result, the revenue grew at a disappointing single-digit rate of 9.8%, down from the double-digit growth they experienced in FY21. Investors ought to be horrified.</p><p>This is attributed to a few reasons:</p><ul><li><p>COVID tailwinds wearing off</p></li><li><p>Intensifying competition</p></li><li><p>The suspension of service in Russia resulted in the loss of subscribers</p></li><li><p>Factors like the adoption of Connected TVs &amp; on-demand entertainment, which is outside of its control</p></li><li><p>The inability to monetize the 100 million non-subscribers using Netflix’s password sharing</p></li></ul><p>To re-accelerate its double-digit revenue growth, here’s what the management has laid out to address investors’ concerns:</p><ol><li><p>To reinvest by coming up with more big-hit content that users want to see</p></li><li><p>To monetize on 100 million households using password sharing</p></li><li><p>Offer a low-priced plan with advertising</p></li></ol><p>However, we think that the strategies are questionable. Let us share our thoughts.</p><h3>Concern #1: Early Monetization</h3><p>The management claimed that there is a huge Total Addressable Market (“TAM”):</p><blockquote>...while hundreds of millions of homes pay for Netflix, well over half of the world’s broadband homes don’t yet, representing huge future growth potential.</blockquote><p>This sounds like they are confident that Netflix has a long runway to grow, and that the majority are to come from international markets. However, instead of reinvesting in the business, why are they focusing on monetizing?</p><p>This news came after Netflix announced that it was going to raise the subscription fees in various countries like the US, Canada, the UK, and even Singapore, where we reside. This highlights its inability to find additional income sources, so it had to resort to raising its prices. These increases were not well-received as customers were unhappy with the multiple price hikes and the crackdown on password sharing. During the Q1’22 results, the subscriber count in the UCAN and EMEA regions (the US and Canada) fell by 640,000 and 300,000, respectively.</p><p>Coincidence? We think not.</p><p>In our view, increasing prices should be a late-game monetization. This is especially so when Netflix is the market leader with a huge TAM. Eventually, it comes to a point where it is impossible to squeeze its customers without it being at the expense of their happiness.</p><h3>Concern #2: Diversifying Its Revenue Through Ad-Tier Plan</h3><p>Digital streaming services have been adopting a hybrid model of Advertising-based Video On Demand (“AVOD”) and Subscription Video On Demand (“SVOD”) as seen on platforms like Hulu, HBO Max, and most recently, Disney+.</p><p>But, what’s the appeal of a hybrid model?</p><p>It is about offering users more control and choices. Users that do not mind seeing ads or are price-sensitive tend to opt for an ad-tier plan, whereas users who prefer a seamless experience are willing to pay more for an ad-free plan. At the same time, the company can generate additional revenue from advertisers by leveraging their massive audiences.</p><p>This creates a win-win-win situation.</p><p>Operating under a pure SVOD model has limitations – there is a cap on how much it can continue to raise its prices before users get frustrated and leave. Prices are increased to cover the rising cost of creating content, and this makes it harder to juggle the balance of reinvesting in content while also offering it at affordable pricing.</p><p>Now, with Netflix jumping on the bandwagon, what does it really mean to its business?</p><p>Netflix is very likely to see existing subscribers churn and switch over from a higher-priced plan, cannibalizing their own subscribers. This in turn may affect revenue in the short term. Could this also be the way to win back price-sensitive customers? More churns will lead to lesser revenue, and less money to compete on content, putting pressure on Netflix to compete with players like Apple and Amazon with strong internal financing, and Disney with valuable franchises.</p><p>Strangely, this decision was made rather abruptly as back in March 2022 (a month ago), CFO Spencer Neumann resisted coming up with an ad-supported tier model as they didn’t feel it was necessary:</p><blockquote>But that&#39;s not something that&#39;s in our plans right now. We think we have a great model in the subscription business. It scales globally, really well…and again, never say never, but it&#39;s not in our plan, but other folks are learning from it. So it&#39;s hard for us to kind of ignore that others are doing it, but it now doesn&#39;t make sense for us.</blockquote><p>Did the management&#39;s inability to foresee the slowdown in growth, lack of revenue streams, pressure from shareholders, and increasing competition cause Netflix to succumb to the decision of moving into an ad-supported model, hoping to curb the slowdown in growth to restore investors’ confidence?</p><h3><b>Concern #3: Invest In Content While Focusing On Profitability</b></h3><p></p><p><img src=\"https://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2022/5/17/saupload_MtFB4ACalwrMRAxUfKx0xuhE3F6t8qcKazLHcWEuOmBVi4xAk2LIsltcxPI4M7ahr0qfnsrhoZDYzmzn8NGd0Q46KzdsgrbA-rjFHqzroQUCXYSwST36mumwXA8rj2WOVkqVTeM5fdIBTlzHAg.png\" tg-width=\"1200\" tg-height=\"742\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>(Source: NFLX IR)</p><p></p><p>During the earnings call, the management talked about reinvesting in its content while also pulling back on its spending to reflect the realities of its revenue growth. Here, you can see that its marketing expenses have declined by ~30% sequentially.</p><p></p><p><img src=\"https://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2022/5/17/saupload_Q5tXqhhNhk8trNMvANeslGfDIovIcIaaGnSmsPXQ0MBf6vXs11GEx356jVL0UO9ueWylc1_j8Uzp5g22xuweqy5vFjMGd5-iWNJGrxvuACSRdj_pxKg2yvQgAaDZSeryE-MIU9eFM1nmmrVPKQ.png\" tg-width=\"1200\" tg-height=\"742\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>(Source: NFLX IR)</p><p><img src=\"https://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2022/5/17/saupload_8eq-XiiBvsA0s285xbwBduy-ICk41UnQ8rFLOf80xsFbA9oj2lLTX_8FfAiN6puh_gA7kAsYiKLoy9oBT3kYdNU28CmH2WgTQsAS76oAcHKiVEep6o8gzbADxAPL-Z5Ebt43-xf3D-ozGSMtOw.png\" tg-width=\"1200\" tg-height=\"742\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>(Source: NFLX IR)</p><p></p><p>As a result, its Gross Margin and Operating Margin have increased to 45.5% and 25.1%, respectively, during the quarter. Over the next 2 years, they are expected to maintain an Operating Margin of 20%.</p><p>This means moving forward, they are going to rely on funding from ads and also increase the revenue per account since it cannot rely on acquiring new subscribers.</p><p>Netflix still has lots to prove to justify its price increase. Without more value added, these increases may drive customers away.</p><h2>Inefficient Marketing Spend</h2><p>This brings us to the next part - its inefficient marketing spend.</p><p>In Q1’22, the management spent a total of $556 million on marketing dollars, yet 200,000 subscribers churned during the quarter and a further 2 million expected in the next quarter. This is $555 million down the drain; and worse, they are losing money for every subscriber they acquired!</p><p></p><p><img src=\"https://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2022/5/17/saupload_taGay5zH_MjdUYB4oRWl90wveWuHp6UvDbQHmrbl57A7DULJw2Ux36a5F0it-JWOFUh3Fwq_S2bKhCoxGDcGRalxAefP100A-6qULcj8XcpC6UfzJF3JgcspGRgmLuihttR3zY4op4fwSSfolA.png\" tg-width=\"1200\" tg-height=\"742\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>(Source: NFLX IR)</p><p></p><p>Furthermore, in the last 2 quarters, its Operating Leverage has started to go downhill as its Operating Profit is growing slower than its revenue growth. This indicates a lack of marketing efficiency as its marketing spend is not translating into revenue growth. In our view, this screams a dire call for change for the marketing team to review its marketing strategies.</p><p>At this time, there is no clear visibility ahead as to whether those strategies being laid out can be implemented successfully to resume its Operating Leverage growth.</p><h2>Closing Thoughts</h2><p>Netflix has done really well over the last decade to bring a huge amount of content that viewers want and need at an affordable price.</p><p>However, the story has drastically changed as existing subscribers are increasingly unhappy with Netflix’s decisions to monetize the platform, and we think their strategies are questionable.</p><p>These red flags do not sound like a growth story to us - at least, for the present.</p><p>The more important question that many are wondering is, has the management lost track of what it really means to put the customers’ interests first? Can they win back the hearts and trust of their customers? These short-term headwinds are currently a test of their ability to execute, and whether they can navigate them remains to be seen.</p><p>What are your thoughts on the quarter? Let us know in the comment section below.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Netflix: A Series Of Red Flags</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nNetflix: A Series Of Red Flags\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-05-17 19:05 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4512405-netflix-a-series-of-red-flags><strong>Seeking Alpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Overview(Source: Google)After Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX) reported its Q1’22 results, the share price tumbled 37%. You might ask, what exactly had happened to warrant such pessimism and drastic drawdown?...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4512405-netflix-a-series-of-red-flags\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NFLX":"奈飞"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4512405-netflix-a-series-of-red-flags","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2236212001","content_text":"Overview(Source: Google)After Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX) reported its Q1’22 results, the share price tumbled 37%. You might ask, what exactly had happened to warrant such pessimism and drastic drawdown?Well, you’ve come to the right place. Here's what we are going to be covering today in this article.Headwinds: Economies Reopening and Competition Intensifying2020 and 2021 were massive years for Netflix as there was an acceleration in the adoption of digital streaming services. However, as the pandemic severity starts to wind down, and people start to spend more time outside, the elevated demand will be reduced to more normalized levels.Competition in the industry is also heating up with the influx of streaming services such as Disney+, Hulu, Apple TV+, HBO Max, and Amazon Prime.This means that users today are spoilt for choice. Companies that fall short of consumers’ expectations, such as the lack of quality content, will find it more challenging to retain these users. The ever-increasing inflation rate has also significantly reduced consumers’ purchasing power, and they are likely to stick with a few core services that are able to attend to their needs. Reports by The Guardian and iMore showed that Apple TV+ and Disney+ have seen huge churn while categorizing Amazon Prime and Netflix as “must-haves”.However, this is not the time to be complacent just yet.Companies like Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) and Amazon (NASDAQ:AMZN) have a highly competitive edge over Netflix as they possess highly profitable core businesses financing their investments in curating more content. This puts pressure on Netflix's ability to invest and compete for the long-term while also focus on profitability at the same time.Growth Deceleration(Source: Netflix Investor Relations)As soon as Netflix reported its Q1’22 quarterly results, all eyes were on its revenue growth and subscriber count. Subscribers are important as costs can be spread over a larger base, and that contributes to the bottom line.However, the results were shocking, to say the least.Instead of reporting 2.5 million new subscribers as guided in Q4’21, the company reported a loss of 200,000 subscribers, making it the first decline in a decade. As a result, the revenue grew at a disappointing single-digit rate of 9.8%, down from the double-digit growth they experienced in FY21. Investors ought to be horrified.This is attributed to a few reasons:COVID tailwinds wearing offIntensifying competitionThe suspension of service in Russia resulted in the loss of subscribersFactors like the adoption of Connected TVs & on-demand entertainment, which is outside of its controlThe inability to monetize the 100 million non-subscribers using Netflix’s password sharingTo re-accelerate its double-digit revenue growth, here’s what the management has laid out to address investors’ concerns:To reinvest by coming up with more big-hit content that users want to seeTo monetize on 100 million households using password sharingOffer a low-priced plan with advertisingHowever, we think that the strategies are questionable. Let us share our thoughts.Concern #1: Early MonetizationThe management claimed that there is a huge Total Addressable Market (“TAM”):...while hundreds of millions of homes pay for Netflix, well over half of the world’s broadband homes don’t yet, representing huge future growth potential.This sounds like they are confident that Netflix has a long runway to grow, and that the majority are to come from international markets. However, instead of reinvesting in the business, why are they focusing on monetizing?This news came after Netflix announced that it was going to raise the subscription fees in various countries like the US, Canada, the UK, and even Singapore, where we reside. This highlights its inability to find additional income sources, so it had to resort to raising its prices. These increases were not well-received as customers were unhappy with the multiple price hikes and the crackdown on password sharing. During the Q1’22 results, the subscriber count in the UCAN and EMEA regions (the US and Canada) fell by 640,000 and 300,000, respectively.Coincidence? We think not.In our view, increasing prices should be a late-game monetization. This is especially so when Netflix is the market leader with a huge TAM. Eventually, it comes to a point where it is impossible to squeeze its customers without it being at the expense of their happiness.Concern #2: Diversifying Its Revenue Through Ad-Tier PlanDigital streaming services have been adopting a hybrid model of Advertising-based Video On Demand (“AVOD”) and Subscription Video On Demand (“SVOD”) as seen on platforms like Hulu, HBO Max, and most recently, Disney+.But, what’s the appeal of a hybrid model?It is about offering users more control and choices. Users that do not mind seeing ads or are price-sensitive tend to opt for an ad-tier plan, whereas users who prefer a seamless experience are willing to pay more for an ad-free plan. At the same time, the company can generate additional revenue from advertisers by leveraging their massive audiences.This creates a win-win-win situation.Operating under a pure SVOD model has limitations – there is a cap on how much it can continue to raise its prices before users get frustrated and leave. Prices are increased to cover the rising cost of creating content, and this makes it harder to juggle the balance of reinvesting in content while also offering it at affordable pricing.Now, with Netflix jumping on the bandwagon, what does it really mean to its business?Netflix is very likely to see existing subscribers churn and switch over from a higher-priced plan, cannibalizing their own subscribers. This in turn may affect revenue in the short term. Could this also be the way to win back price-sensitive customers? More churns will lead to lesser revenue, and less money to compete on content, putting pressure on Netflix to compete with players like Apple and Amazon with strong internal financing, and Disney with valuable franchises.Strangely, this decision was made rather abruptly as back in March 2022 (a month ago), CFO Spencer Neumann resisted coming up with an ad-supported tier model as they didn’t feel it was necessary:But that's not something that's in our plans right now. We think we have a great model in the subscription business. It scales globally, really well…and again, never say never, but it's not in our plan, but other folks are learning from it. So it's hard for us to kind of ignore that others are doing it, but it now doesn't make sense for us.Did the management's inability to foresee the slowdown in growth, lack of revenue streams, pressure from shareholders, and increasing competition cause Netflix to succumb to the decision of moving into an ad-supported model, hoping to curb the slowdown in growth to restore investors’ confidence?Concern #3: Invest In Content While Focusing On Profitability(Source: NFLX IR)During the earnings call, the management talked about reinvesting in its content while also pulling back on its spending to reflect the realities of its revenue growth. Here, you can see that its marketing expenses have declined by ~30% sequentially.(Source: NFLX IR)(Source: NFLX IR)As a result, its Gross Margin and Operating Margin have increased to 45.5% and 25.1%, respectively, during the quarter. Over the next 2 years, they are expected to maintain an Operating Margin of 20%.This means moving forward, they are going to rely on funding from ads and also increase the revenue per account since it cannot rely on acquiring new subscribers.Netflix still has lots to prove to justify its price increase. Without more value added, these increases may drive customers away.Inefficient Marketing SpendThis brings us to the next part - its inefficient marketing spend.In Q1’22, the management spent a total of $556 million on marketing dollars, yet 200,000 subscribers churned during the quarter and a further 2 million expected in the next quarter. This is $555 million down the drain; and worse, they are losing money for every subscriber they acquired!(Source: NFLX IR)Furthermore, in the last 2 quarters, its Operating Leverage has started to go downhill as its Operating Profit is growing slower than its revenue growth. This indicates a lack of marketing efficiency as its marketing spend is not translating into revenue growth. In our view, this screams a dire call for change for the marketing team to review its marketing strategies.At this time, there is no clear visibility ahead as to whether those strategies being laid out can be implemented successfully to resume its Operating Leverage growth.Closing ThoughtsNetflix has done really well over the last decade to bring a huge amount of content that viewers want and need at an affordable price.However, the story has drastically changed as existing subscribers are increasingly unhappy with Netflix’s decisions to monetize the platform, and we think their strategies are questionable.These red flags do not sound like a growth story to us - at least, for the present.The more important question that many are wondering is, has the management lost track of what it really means to put the customers’ interests first? Can they win back the hearts and trust of their customers? These short-term headwinds are currently a test of their ability to execute, and whether they can navigate them remains to be seen.What are your thoughts on the quarter? Let us know in the comment section below.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"NFLX":1}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2101,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9090059101,"gmtCreate":1643039132207,"gmtModify":1676533767845,"author":{"id":"3572310408162611","authorId":"3572310408162611","name":"Vanillin","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/42bb976aee4ad7669c027cd08d6aee51","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3572310408162611","authorIdStr":"3572310408162611"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Netflix is still considered a big tech by any means. It's at least making money joining the ranks of the&nbsp;likes AAPL, GOOG, MSFT &amp; META","listText":"Netflix is still considered a big tech by any means. It's at least making money joining the ranks of the&nbsp;likes AAPL, GOOG, MSFT &amp; META","text":"Netflix is still considered a big tech by any means. It's at least making money joining the ranks of the likes AAPL, GOOG, MSFT & META","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9090059101","repostId":"2205009998","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2205009998","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1643035806,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2205009998?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-01-24 22:50","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Thinking of Selling Netflix? 2 Things to Remember","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2205009998","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"The first-quarter guidance was ugly, but there's more to the story than that.","content":"<div>\n<p>Investors are pressing pause on Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX). The streaming stock  got torched Thursday afternoon after it reported disappointing guidance in its fourth-quarter earnings report. Shares ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/01/24/thinking-of-selling-netflix-2-things-to-remember/\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Thinking of Selling Netflix? 2 Things to Remember</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nThinking of Selling Netflix? 2 Things to Remember\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-01-24 22:50 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/01/24/thinking-of-selling-netflix-2-things-to-remember/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Investors are pressing pause on Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX). The streaming stock  got torched Thursday afternoon after it reported disappointing guidance in its fourth-quarter earnings report. Shares ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/01/24/thinking-of-selling-netflix-2-things-to-remember/\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NFLX":"奈飞","BK4527":"明星科技股","BK4551":"寇图资本持仓","BK4566":"资本集团","BK4108":"电影和娱乐","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","BK4548":"巴美列捷福持仓","BK4507":"流媒体概念","BK4524":"宅经济概念","BK4532":"文艺复兴科技持仓"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/01/24/thinking-of-selling-netflix-2-things-to-remember/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2205009998","content_text":"Investors are pressing pause on Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX). The streaming stock  got torched Thursday afternoon after it reported disappointing guidance in its fourth-quarter earnings report. Shares plunged 20% in after-hours trading.The sell-off itself wasn't surprising. Netflix called for just 2.5 million subscriber additions in the current quarter, an unusually weak forecast for a seasonally strong quarter. Worse, it sees revenue growing just 10% to $7.9 billion, which would be its slowest growth in a decade.If you're thinking of selling Netflix stock on the news, you're not alone. Wall Street analysts trashed the streamer following the report, with one calling it \"dead money\" and another saying \"the good old days may be gone.\" Indeed, the days of Netflix posting breathless growth quarter after quarter are likely over, barring an unforeseen change to the business. But if you're ready to part with Netflix shares following the stock plunge and the disappointing guidance, you should be aware of two things.1. Shares have never been cheaper in the streaming eraNetflix may no longer be behaving like a growth stock, but the good news is it's no longer priced like one either. Following the post-earnings dip, Netflix shares now trade at a price-to-earnings ratio of just 36. That's only modestly higher than the S&P 500's P/E ratio of 26, and cheaper than it's ever been since 2012 when the company made streaming its primary business, leaving the DVD-by-mail operation behind.While Netflix's growth has slowed in recent years, it's turned into a profit machine. The company just finished a year with a 21% operating margin, making earlier cries about cash burn look silly. In 2022, management actually expects a modest decline in operating margin, at 19%-20%, but that's primarily due to a stronger U.S. dollar, which is expected to shave 2 percentage points off that metric.The company is still sticking to its long-term promise of delivering an average increase in operating margin of 3 percentage points a year, meaning by 2024 it expects to keep 28% of its revenue as operating profit. Even as revenue growth is slowing, profit margin will accelerate to make up for it. 2022 is just a noisy year because of foreign exchange and outsize growth in profit margins over the last two years.2. Revenue growth will improve after Q1Netflix didn't provide guidance beyond the first quarter, and there's no question the Q1 numbers are disappointing. With 2.5 million subscriber additions, this would be its weakest Q1 performance in at least five years, and a slowdown in revenue growth from 16% in Q4 2021 to 10% in the current quarter seems severe.However, management seemed to imply that revenue growth would improve after the first quarter. It noted that its first-quarter content releases were weighted toward the end of the quarter with two big releases (Bridgerton and The Adam Project) slated for March, meaning the impact of those will also be felt in Q2. Additionally, the company is raising prices on all North American subscriptions with the standard U.S. package going from $13.99/month to $15.49/month.  The financial numbers should begin to benefit from that price hike in the second quarter as about 40% of its revenue still comes from North America. Netflix's last price hike in the U.S. was in October 2020 so Q1 represents a lull where the revenue numbers don't get a tailwind from higher U.S. prices. From Q2 on, revenue growth should improve to at least the mid-teens.The new Netflix realityKeeping those factors in mind, it's also worth remembering that Netflix's heady growth days are probably over. It's hard to see the stock doubling in a year as it did multiple times during the 2010s, now that its business is much more mature and revenue is only growing in the teens.Still, considering the stock's valuation, a probable rebound in performance after the first quarter, and a number of valuable competitive advantages including its leadership in a huge growth market, the stock looks like a good bet to outperform the S&P 500 over the next three to five years.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"NFLX":1}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3532,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9004396684,"gmtCreate":1642499275985,"gmtModify":1676533715826,"author":{"id":"3572310408162611","authorId":"3572310408162611","name":"Vanillin","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/42bb976aee4ad7669c027cd08d6aee51","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3572310408162611","authorIdStr":"3572310408162611"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"sigh…[Put]&nbsp;","listText":"sigh…[Put]&nbsp;","text":"sigh…[Put]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9004396684","repostId":"1125098838","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1125098838","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1642498524,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1125098838?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-01-18 17:35","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Hot Chinese ADRs Slid in Premarket Trading","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1125098838","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Hot Chinese ADRs slid in Premarket Trading. Alibaba, JD.com, Pinduoduo, Baidu, NetEase, IQiyi and RL","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Hot Chinese ADRs slid in Premarket Trading. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BABA\">Alibaba</a>, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/JD\">JD.com</a>, Pinduoduo, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BIDU\">Baidu</a>, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NTES\">NetEase</a>, IQiyi and RLX Technology fell between 1% and 5%.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5ebed618d1c4b089af648a54f3680a81\" tg-width=\"366\" tg-height=\"647\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Hot Chinese ADRs Slid in Premarket Trading</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHot Chinese ADRs Slid in Premarket Trading\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-01-18 17:35</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>Hot Chinese ADRs slid in Premarket Trading. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BABA\">Alibaba</a>, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/JD\">JD.com</a>, Pinduoduo, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BIDU\">Baidu</a>, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NTES\">NetEase</a>, IQiyi and RLX Technology fell between 1% and 5%.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5ebed618d1c4b089af648a54f3680a81\" tg-width=\"366\" tg-height=\"647\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BK4505":"高瓴资本持仓","BABA":"阿里巴巴","BK4504":"桥水持仓","BIDU":"百度","BK4548":"巴美列捷福持仓","NTES":"网易","09988":"阿里巴巴-W","JD":"京东","BK4509":"腾讯概念","QNETCN":"纳斯达克中美互联网老虎指数","BK4532":"文艺复兴科技持仓","BK4527":"明星科技股","DIDI":"滴滴(已退市)","BK4077":"互动媒体与服务","09618":"京东集团-SW","BK4531":"中概回港概念","BK4526":"热门中概股","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","BK4514":"搜索引擎","BK4122":"互联网与直销零售","BK4558":"双十一"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1125098838","content_text":"Hot Chinese ADRs slid in Premarket Trading. Alibaba, JD.com, Pinduoduo, Baidu, NetEase, IQiyi and RLX Technology fell between 1% and 5%.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"BABA":0.9,"QNETCN":0.9,"09988":0.9,"BIDU":0.9,"JD":0.9,"NTES":0.9,"DIDI":0.9,"09618":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2792,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9002420532,"gmtCreate":1642075405797,"gmtModify":1676533678185,"author":{"id":"3572310408162611","authorId":"3572310408162611","name":"Vanillin","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/42bb976aee4ad7669c027cd08d6aee51","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3572310408162611","authorIdStr":"3572310408162611"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Diamond hand.. I like Zoom, &nbsp;it they need to be more aggressive in their investment strategy. PLTR too secretive a company, and CEO cares little on&nbsp;building&nbsp;shareholders’ interest.&nbsp;&nbsp;","listText":"Diamond hand.. I like Zoom, &nbsp;it they need to be more aggressive in their investment strategy. PLTR too secretive a company, and CEO cares little on&nbsp;building&nbsp;shareholders’ interest.&nbsp;&nbsp;","text":"Diamond hand.. I like Zoom, it they need to be more aggressive in their investment strategy. PLTR too secretive a company, and CEO cares little on building shareholders’ interest.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9002420532","repostId":"1186224135","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1186224135","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Stock Market Quotes, Business News, Financial News, Trading Ideas, and Stock Research by Professionals","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Benzinga","id":"1052270027","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa"},"pubTimestamp":1642073038,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1186224135?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-01-13 19:23","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Cathie Wood Sells Another $3M Shares In Tesla On Wednesday — Here's What She Bought Instead","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1186224135","media":"Benzinga","summary":"Cathie Wood’sArk Investment Managementon Wednesday booked more profit inTeslaInc, selling 2,656 shares — estimated to be worth $2.9 million based on the latest closing price — in the electric vehicle ","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>Cathie Wood</b>’s <b>Ark Investment Management</b> on Wednesday booked more profit in <b>Tesla</b> <b>Inc</b>, selling 2,656 shares — estimated to be worth $2.9 million based on the latest closing price — in the electric vehicle maker.</p><p>The <b>Elon Musk</b>-led company’s stock closed 3.9% higher at $1,106.2 per share on Wednesday.</p><p>Ark Invest owns shares in Tesla via three of its exchange-traded funds — the <b>Ark Innovation ETF</b>, the <b>Ark Autonomous Technology &amp; Robotics ETF</b> and the <b>Ark Next Generation Internet ETF</b>.</p><p>The three ETFs held about 1.61 million shares worth $1.72 billion in Tesla, prior to Wednesday’s trade.</p><p>Tesla ended 2021 on a high as it posted its biggest quarterly and full-year delivery volume. The Austin, Texas-based electric vehicle maker’s Giga Shanghai accounted for more than half of the electric vehicle maker’s global deliveries in 2021.</p><p>Wood, who founded Ark Invest, is a Tesla bull and has set a $3,000 price target for the electric vehicle stock for 2025. The investment firm has been selling shares in Tesla since September after shares moved higher to breach the$1 trillion market cap.</p><p>The St. Petersburg, Florida-based Ark has also been recently loading up shares in the U.S.-listed Chinese electric vehicle maker <b>Xpeng Inc</b>.</p><p>Here are a few other key Ark Invest trades from Wednesday:</p><ul><li>Bought 70,259 shares — estimated to be about $12 million — in <b>Zoom Video Communications Inc</b> on the dip. The Zoom stock closed 3% lower at $170.6 a share on Wednesday.</li><li>Bought 628,636 shares — estimated to be worth $10.5 million — in <b>Palantir Technologies Inc</b>. Shares of the company closed 1% lower at $16.7 a share.</li></ul></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Cathie Wood Sells Another $3M Shares In Tesla On Wednesday — Here's What She Bought Instead</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nCathie Wood Sells Another $3M Shares In Tesla On Wednesday — Here's What She Bought Instead\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Benzinga </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-01-13 19:23</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p><b>Cathie Wood</b>’s <b>Ark Investment Management</b> on Wednesday booked more profit in <b>Tesla</b> <b>Inc</b>, selling 2,656 shares — estimated to be worth $2.9 million based on the latest closing price — in the electric vehicle maker.</p><p>The <b>Elon Musk</b>-led company’s stock closed 3.9% higher at $1,106.2 per share on Wednesday.</p><p>Ark Invest owns shares in Tesla via three of its exchange-traded funds — the <b>Ark Innovation ETF</b>, the <b>Ark Autonomous Technology &amp; Robotics ETF</b> and the <b>Ark Next Generation Internet ETF</b>.</p><p>The three ETFs held about 1.61 million shares worth $1.72 billion in Tesla, prior to Wednesday’s trade.</p><p>Tesla ended 2021 on a high as it posted its biggest quarterly and full-year delivery volume. The Austin, Texas-based electric vehicle maker’s Giga Shanghai accounted for more than half of the electric vehicle maker’s global deliveries in 2021.</p><p>Wood, who founded Ark Invest, is a Tesla bull and has set a $3,000 price target for the electric vehicle stock for 2025. The investment firm has been selling shares in Tesla since September after shares moved higher to breach the$1 trillion market cap.</p><p>The St. Petersburg, Florida-based Ark has also been recently loading up shares in the U.S.-listed Chinese electric vehicle maker <b>Xpeng Inc</b>.</p><p>Here are a few other key Ark Invest trades from Wednesday:</p><ul><li>Bought 70,259 shares — estimated to be about $12 million — in <b>Zoom Video Communications Inc</b> on the dip. The Zoom stock closed 3% lower at $170.6 a share on Wednesday.</li><li>Bought 628,636 shares — estimated to be worth $10.5 million — in <b>Palantir Technologies Inc</b>. Shares of the company closed 1% lower at $16.7 a share.</li></ul></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"ZM":"Zoom","TSLA":"特斯拉","PLTR":"Palantir Technologies Inc."},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1186224135","content_text":"Cathie Wood’s Ark Investment Management on Wednesday booked more profit in Tesla Inc, selling 2,656 shares — estimated to be worth $2.9 million based on the latest closing price — in the electric vehicle maker.The Elon Musk-led company’s stock closed 3.9% higher at $1,106.2 per share on Wednesday.Ark Invest owns shares in Tesla via three of its exchange-traded funds — the Ark Innovation ETF, the Ark Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF and the Ark Next Generation Internet ETF.The three ETFs held about 1.61 million shares worth $1.72 billion in Tesla, prior to Wednesday’s trade.Tesla ended 2021 on a high as it posted its biggest quarterly and full-year delivery volume. The Austin, Texas-based electric vehicle maker’s Giga Shanghai accounted for more than half of the electric vehicle maker’s global deliveries in 2021.Wood, who founded Ark Invest, is a Tesla bull and has set a $3,000 price target for the electric vehicle stock for 2025. The investment firm has been selling shares in Tesla since September after shares moved higher to breach the$1 trillion market cap.The St. Petersburg, Florida-based Ark has also been recently loading up shares in the U.S.-listed Chinese electric vehicle maker Xpeng Inc.Here are a few other key Ark Invest trades from Wednesday:Bought 70,259 shares — estimated to be about $12 million — in Zoom Video Communications Inc on the dip. The Zoom stock closed 3% lower at $170.6 a share on Wednesday.Bought 628,636 shares — estimated to be worth $10.5 million — in Palantir Technologies Inc. Shares of the company closed 1% lower at $16.7 a share.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"PLTR":0.9,"TSLA":0.9,"ZM":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2040,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9008766283,"gmtCreate":1641527268702,"gmtModify":1676533625891,"author":{"id":"3572310408162611","authorId":"3572310408162611","name":"Vanillin","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/42bb976aee4ad7669c027cd08d6aee51","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3572310408162611","authorIdStr":"3572310408162611"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Buying into SPACS is like throwing darts.. hopefully&nbsp;strike some good ones but some land on your toes. (GRAB),&nbsp;and that hurt 😞&nbsp;","listText":"Buying into SPACS is like throwing darts.. hopefully&nbsp;strike some good ones but some land on your toes. (GRAB),&nbsp;and that hurt 😞&nbsp;","text":"Buying into SPACS is like throwing darts.. hopefully strike some good ones but some land on your toes. (GRAB), and that hurt 😞","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9008766283","repostId":"2201629196","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2201629196","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1641526905,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2201629196?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-01-07 11:41","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Singapore SPAC Vertex Technology set for local listing on Jan 21 - source","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2201629196","media":"Reuters","summary":"SINGAPORE (Reuters) - A Singapore special-purpose acquisition company (SPAC) backed by state investo","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>SINGAPORE (Reuters) - A Singapore special-purpose acquisition company (SPAC) backed by state investor Temasek&#39;s Vertex Venture Holdings has started the book building for its initial public offering (IPO) and is set to list in the city-state on Jan. 21, a source with knowledge of the matter said on Friday.</p><p>Vertex Technology Acquisition Corp (VTAC), a SPAC focussing on cybersecurity, fintech and other sectors, said on Thursday it aimed to raise at least about S$170 million ($125 million) by selling units at S$5 apiece.</p><p>The source declined to be identified as he was not authorised to speak to the media.</p><p>There was no immediate response to a query sent to Vertex Venture Holdings.</p><p>($1 = 1.3599 Singapore dollars)</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Singapore SPAC Vertex Technology set for local listing on Jan 21 - source</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSingapore SPAC Vertex Technology set for local listing on Jan 21 - source\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-01-07 11:41</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>SINGAPORE (Reuters) - A Singapore special-purpose acquisition company (SPAC) backed by state investor Temasek&#39;s Vertex Venture Holdings has started the book building for its initial public offering (IPO) and is set to list in the city-state on Jan. 21, a source with knowledge of the matter said on Friday.</p><p>Vertex Technology Acquisition Corp (VTAC), a SPAC focussing on cybersecurity, fintech and other sectors, said on Thursday it aimed to raise at least about S$170 million ($125 million) by selling units at S$5 apiece.</p><p>The source declined to be identified as he was not authorised to speak to the media.</p><p>There was no immediate response to a query sent to Vertex Venture Holdings.</p><p>($1 = 1.3599 Singapore dollars)</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"VERX":"Vertex, Inc.","BK4023":"应用软件"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2201629196","content_text":"SINGAPORE (Reuters) - A Singapore special-purpose acquisition company (SPAC) backed by state investor Temasek's Vertex Venture Holdings has started the book building for its initial public offering (IPO) and is set to list in the city-state on Jan. 21, a source with knowledge of the matter said on Friday.Vertex Technology Acquisition Corp (VTAC), a SPAC focussing on cybersecurity, fintech and other sectors, said on Thursday it aimed to raise at least about S$170 million ($125 million) by selling units at S$5 apiece.The source declined to be identified as he was not authorised to speak to the media.There was no immediate response to a query sent to Vertex Venture Holdings.($1 = 1.3599 Singapore dollars)","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"VERX":1}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3610,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[{"author":{"id":"3573540190522229","authorId":"3573540190522229","name":"Targarean","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/59de1c73df3e7e460bd84cc786850fa6","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"idStr":"3573540190522229","authorIdStr":"3573540190522229"},"content":"Like throwing darts in the dark 😂 and $5 a piece seems rather steep. Gotta check out the financi als","text":"Like throwing darts in the dark 😂 and $5 a piece seems rather steep. Gotta check out the financi als","html":"Like throwing darts in the dark 😂 and $5 a piece seems rather steep. Gotta check out the financi als"}],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9000103271,"gmtCreate":1639975622470,"gmtModify":1676533497106,"author":{"id":"3572310408162611","authorId":"3572310408162611","name":"Vanillin","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/42bb976aee4ad7669c027cd08d6aee51","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3572310408162611","authorIdStr":"3572310408162611"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"&nbsp;Sale coming..","listText":"&nbsp;Sale coming..","text":"Sale coming..","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9000103271","repostId":"2192989909","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2192989909","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1639959739,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2192989909?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-12-20 08:22","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Sell-Off? Correction? 3 Stocks to Buy That Are Already 50% Off Their Highs","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2192989909","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Looking for some year-end deals on top stocks for 2022? Look no further.","content":"<div>\n<p>Even though the S&P 500 is trading close to its all-time high, tech investors have been feeling the heat as highly valued stocks have been dragged down. As the year comes to a close, we're taking a ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/12/19/sell-off-correction-3-stocks-to-buy-that-are-alrea/\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Sell-Off? Correction? 3 Stocks to Buy That Are Already 50% Off Their Highs</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSell-Off? Correction? 3 Stocks to Buy That Are Already 50% Off Their Highs\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-12-20 08:22 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/12/19/sell-off-correction-3-stocks-to-buy-that-are-alrea/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Even though the S&P 500 is trading close to its all-time high, tech investors have been feeling the heat as highly valued stocks have been dragged down. As the year comes to a close, we're taking a ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/12/19/sell-off-correction-3-stocks-to-buy-that-are-alrea/\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BK4551":"寇图资本持仓","AI":"C3.ai, Inc.","BK4549":"软银资本持仓","BK4107":"财产与意外伤害保险","BK4528":"SaaS概念","BK4547":"WSB热门概念","BK4023":"应用软件","BK4535":"淡马锡持仓","BK4548":"巴美列捷福持仓","BK4122":"互联网与直销零售","BK4543":"AI"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/12/19/sell-off-correction-3-stocks-to-buy-that-are-alrea/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2192989909","content_text":"Even though the S&P 500 is trading close to its all-time high, tech investors have been feeling the heat as highly valued stocks have been dragged down. As the year comes to a close, we're taking a look at some beaten-down stocks that we think the market has wrong.\nThree longtime Fool contributors picked their favorite stock for 2022 that was off its high 50% or more. They came up with Chewy (NYSE:CHWY), Palantir Technologies (NYSE:PLTR), and Lemonade (NYSE:LMND).\nImage source: Getty Images.\nAfter months on a leash, this stock could run again soon \nWill Healy (Chewy): Chewy has carved out a niche for itself in the pet supply business. This e-commerce stock has stood out over prospective competitors such as Amazon through a higher level of customer interaction. The company stands by its 100% unconditional satisfaction guarantee and offers its customer a personal touch, which has built loyalty among its customer base.\nChewy stock thrived during the pandemic, but interestingly, near-term concerns appear to hinge on the concept of pet ownership, not Chewy's performance. Having a pet became more attractive during the pandemic, according to The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals. Consequently, investors seem worried that the end of the lockdowns would lead to less interest in pet ownership, even though the evidence suggests otherwise. Such concerns helped put Chewy in the doghouse as it dropped by more than 50% since peaking in February.\nNonetheless, investors should not expect Chewy to roll over permanently. This year, the company partnered with Trupanion to offer pet health insurance. And despite worries, Chewy also increased net sales per active customer by 15% over the last year to $419.\nGiven that surge, it should not surprise shareholders that the company reported over $6.5 billion in revenue for the first nine months of 2021, 27% more than in the first three quarters of 2020. This reduced the net loss in the first 39 weeks of 2021 to just over $10 million, primarily by slowing the growth in the cost of goods sold to 23%. Chewy lost close to $114 million during the same period in 2020.\nFor the full year, Chewy forecasts revenue at approximately $8.9 billion. If that holds, it would signify 25% higher revenue year over year. Admittedly, that also points to a fourth-quarter sales forecast of $2.42 billion at the midpoint, which would mean a more modest 18% increase.\nHowever, thanks to that rising revenue and falling stock price, the price-to-sales (P/S) ratio now stands at 2.8. This closely approximates Chewy's sales multiple from two years ago, before the start of the pandemic. Such a P/S ratio and the prospects for further growth could make Chewy an increasingly attractive buying opportunity.\nImage source: Getty Images.\nCutting-edge artificial intelligence at a discount\nDanny Vena (Palantir): When the stock market swoons, it sometimes throws out the baby with the bathwater, as the old saying goes. This presents savvy investors with an opportunity to pick up shares of high-growth companies on the cheap. That is certainly the case with Palantir Technologies.\nIn the wake of 9/11, it became clear that the U.S. government needed a way to gather, analyze, and share siloed data trapped in aging software systems across various intelligence agencies that didn't communicate.\nPeter Thiel, one of the co-founders of PayPal Holdings, developed an elegant solution: a data mining tool that could collect information from across thousands of government databases and assemble a puzzle from pieces left by would-be terrorists. By using machine learning and other artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms, it could distinguish patterns that might otherwise go unnoticed -- and Palantir was born.\nPalantir has the ability to fuse together seemingly unrelated factoids, giving intelligence officials advance notice for potential terrorist attacks. The system is able to stitch together seemingly disparate pieces of information to create a picture -- a one-way plane ticket; large, frequent withdrawals from foreign bank accounts; a rented condo; repeated calls to known terrorist safe havens; a rented truck; and the purchase of theme park tickets -- and in doing so identify a potential terrorist attack.\nNo longer relegated to just government agencies, Palantir's technology can be deployed by commercial enterprises to gather unstructured, siloed data across legacy systems and assemble it in one place, thereby providing keen and valuable insights -- and business is booming.\nIn the third quarter, total revenue grew 36% year over year, but revenue from U.S. enterprise businesses surged 103%, as Palantir's commercial customer count grew 46%. In fact, since Dec. 31, 2020, its commercial customer count has increased 135%.\nPalantir closed 54 deals worth more than $1 million, of which 33 contracts were worth $5 million, and 18 were worth $10 million or more. The company's total remaining deal value -- similar to remaining performance obligation -- climbed 50% to $3.6 billion, giving keen insight into Palantir's future prospects.\nWhile the company isn't yet profitable, it generated operating cash flow of more than $100 million, which shows that much of the shortfall is related to non-cash expenses like depreciation.\nEven more compelling was management's commentary that it expects annual revenue growth of at least 30% or more through 2025.\nYet even in light of its impressive results and stellar prospects, Palantir's stock has lost more than half its value, dragged down by the overall negative market sentiment. This gives investors the opportunity to buy into a wildly successful business at a significant discount.\nImage source: Getty Images.\nThis insurance disruptor may be down, but it's not out\nBrian Withers (Lemonade): Lemonade is disrupting the insurance industry with products that embody the company's tag line, \"Instant everything. Incredible prices. Big heart.\" Its co-founders, Daniel Schreiber and Shai Wininger, wanted to build a different kind of insurance company. In the S-1 filing, they described it as \"rebuilding insurance from the ground up on a digital substrate and an innovative business model\" to make insurance \"more delightful, more affordable, more precise, and more socially impactful.\" From its results, they seem to be doing just that.\nThe table below includes selected results from the latest earnings report. Not only is the company collecting 84% more premiums year over year, but its premiums per customer are also gaining ground at an impressive 26%.\n\n\n\nMetric\nQ3 2020\nQ2 2021\nQ3 2021 \nChange (QOQ)\nChange (YOY)\n\n\n\n\nIn force premium (IFP)\n$189 million\n$297 million\n$347 million\n17%\n84%\n\n\nCustomers\n0.94 million\n1.21 million\n1.36 million\n12%\n45%\n\n\nIFP per customer\n$201\n$246\n$254\n3%\n26%\n\n\n\nData source: Company earnings reports. QOQ = quarter over quarter. YOY = year over year.\nBut what savvy investors know is that these results are based only on its renters, life, pet, and homeowners insurance. This doesn't even include anything from its entry into auto insurance. In early November, the company tiptoed into this market with the announcement of its first auto policies available in Illinois. But, a few days later, it made a massive splash with the announcement of its acquisition of Metromile in an all-stock transaction. Management has estimated that Lemonade's customers spend more than $1 billion on auto insurance products from other companies. When this deal closes in the second quarter of 2022, the 1 million-plus Lemonade customers will have access to Lemonade-branded auto policies. As a Lemonade shareholder, this is certainly well worth waiting for.\nIn the meantime, investors can get this innovative insurance disruptor with an impressive moat on sale. The market has bid down this insurance technology stock close to an all-time low. With the stock down over 70% from its high, those who want to get a deal on this lemon may not get it at a better price than it is today.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"AI":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3543,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":881643201,"gmtCreate":1631334899703,"gmtModify":1676530531735,"author":{"id":"3572310408162611","authorId":"3572310408162611","name":"Vanillin","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/42bb976aee4ad7669c027cd08d6aee51","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3572310408162611","authorIdStr":"3572310408162611"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Fair ruling;&nbsp;Short term impact, still&nbsp;Long AAPL.own it not trade.&nbsp;","listText":"Fair ruling;&nbsp;Short term impact, still&nbsp;Long AAPL.own it not trade.&nbsp;","text":"Fair ruling; Short term impact, still Long AAPL.own it not trade.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/881643201","repostId":"1147045390","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1147045390","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1631321547,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1147045390?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-09-11 08:52","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why Apple’s Risk Is Limited","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1147045390","media":"Barrons","summary":"Apple faces real, but limited, risk to its revenue and profits from Friday’s ruling that requires it to allow developers to offer alternative payment methods for purchases made in apps downloaded through the Apple app store.In a case filed by Fortnite publisher Epic Games, U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers issued a permanent injunction that requires Apple  to allow developers the option to include links to alternative payment methods in their apps. Apple’s own payment system takes a 30%","content":"<p>Apple faces real, but limited, risk to its revenue and profits from Friday’s ruling that requires it to allow developers to offer alternative payment methods for purchases made in apps downloaded through the Apple app store.</p>\n<p>In a case filed by Fortnite publisher Epic Games, U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers issued a permanent injunction that requires Apple (ticker: AAPL) to allow developers the option to include links to alternative payment methods in their apps. Apple’s own payment system takes a 30% cut from large developers.</p>\n<p>Data from the app tracker SensorTower shows that in calendar 2020, Apple had overall revenue from the App Store of $72.3 billion, generating an estimated $21.7 billion in fees, or about 7% of Apple’s overall revenues. That includes $21 billion in spending in the U.S., generating about $6.3 billion in fees, or about 2% of annualized revenues.</p>\n<p>SensorTower estimates that mobile-game spending in the App Store in calendar 2020 was $47.6 billion, generating $14.3 billion in fees, or a little under 5% of Apple’s total revenues.</p>\n<p>Gene Munster, managing director of the venture firm Loup Capital and a former sell-side analyst with a long history of tracking Apple, estimated that the App Store accounts for about 14% of the company’s profits. But he sees limited risk from Friday’s ruling.</p>\n<p>Munster thinks most app developers will stay inside of the Apple system. He sees “at most” a 2% headwind to overall revenue, and a potential 4% hit to profits.</p>\n<p>“After the first year of these changes, app store growth rates will return to normal,” he said. “Bottom line, it’s at most a one-year headwind and does not change the big picture of where Apple is going over the next 5 years.”</p>\n<p>Evercore ISI analyst Amit Daryanani said in a research note that the ruling is a setback for Apple, but that the eventual impact is likely to be manageable, given Apple has alternative ways to generate revenue from the store, including its growing in-store ad business. And he noted that Apple actually got a win on a bigger issue in the case: The judge rejected Epic’s assertion that the App Store is an illegal monopoly. Daryanani estimated the risk to Apple’s per-share earnings at 2% to 4%.</p>\n<p>Wedbush analyst Dan Ives told&nbsp;<i>Barron’s</i>&nbsp;he thinks the worst-case scenario is a 3% to 4% hit to revenues, describing the risk as a “rounding error.” While Ives said the Street had expected an across-the-board win for Apple, the mixed decision removes an overhang on the stock and that investors are likely relieved to put the issue to rest.</p>\n<p>The ruling is more a positive for companies like&nbsp;Spotify Technology&nbsp;and&nbsp;Match Group&nbsp;than it is a negative for Apple, he said. Apple stock fell 3.3% to $148.97&nbsp;on&nbsp;Friday, while Spotify and March gained 0.7% and&nbsp;4.2%, respectively.</p>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why Apple’s Risk Is Limited</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy Apple’s Risk Is Limited\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-09-11 08:52 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.barrons.com/articles/apple-app-store-epic-51631304007?mod=hp_LEAD_1_B_2><strong>Barrons</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Apple faces real, but limited, risk to its revenue and profits from Friday’s ruling that requires it to allow developers to offer alternative payment methods for purchases made in apps downloaded ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/apple-app-store-epic-51631304007?mod=hp_LEAD_1_B_2\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/apple-app-store-epic-51631304007?mod=hp_LEAD_1_B_2","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1147045390","content_text":"Apple faces real, but limited, risk to its revenue and profits from Friday’s ruling that requires it to allow developers to offer alternative payment methods for purchases made in apps downloaded through the Apple app store.\nIn a case filed by Fortnite publisher Epic Games, U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers issued a permanent injunction that requires Apple (ticker: AAPL) to allow developers the option to include links to alternative payment methods in their apps. Apple’s own payment system takes a 30% cut from large developers.\nData from the app tracker SensorTower shows that in calendar 2020, Apple had overall revenue from the App Store of $72.3 billion, generating an estimated $21.7 billion in fees, or about 7% of Apple’s overall revenues. That includes $21 billion in spending in the U.S., generating about $6.3 billion in fees, or about 2% of annualized revenues.\nSensorTower estimates that mobile-game spending in the App Store in calendar 2020 was $47.6 billion, generating $14.3 billion in fees, or a little under 5% of Apple’s total revenues.\nGene Munster, managing director of the venture firm Loup Capital and a former sell-side analyst with a long history of tracking Apple, estimated that the App Store accounts for about 14% of the company’s profits. But he sees limited risk from Friday’s ruling.\nMunster thinks most app developers will stay inside of the Apple system. He sees “at most” a 2% headwind to overall revenue, and a potential 4% hit to profits.\n“After the first year of these changes, app store growth rates will return to normal,” he said. “Bottom line, it’s at most a one-year headwind and does not change the big picture of where Apple is going over the next 5 years.”\nEvercore ISI analyst Amit Daryanani said in a research note that the ruling is a setback for Apple, but that the eventual impact is likely to be manageable, given Apple has alternative ways to generate revenue from the store, including its growing in-store ad business. And he noted that Apple actually got a win on a bigger issue in the case: The judge rejected Epic’s assertion that the App Store is an illegal monopoly. Daryanani estimated the risk to Apple’s per-share earnings at 2% to 4%.\nWedbush analyst Dan Ives told Barron’s he thinks the worst-case scenario is a 3% to 4% hit to revenues, describing the risk as a “rounding error.” While Ives said the Street had expected an across-the-board win for Apple, the mixed decision removes an overhang on the stock and that investors are likely relieved to put the issue to rest.\nThe ruling is more a positive for companies like Spotify Technology and Match Group than it is a negative for Apple, he said. Apple stock fell 3.3% to $148.97 on Friday, while Spotify and March gained 0.7% and 4.2%, respectively.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"AAPL":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2278,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":880098232,"gmtCreate":1630995970426,"gmtModify":1676530437969,"author":{"id":"3572310408162611","authorId":"3572310408162611","name":"Vanillin","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/42bb976aee4ad7669c027cd08d6aee51","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3572310408162611","authorIdStr":"3572310408162611"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Started accumulating at $450. Strong supportat $420.&nbsp;","listText":"Started accumulating at $450. Strong supportat $420.&nbsp;","text":"Started accumulating at $450. Strong supportat $420.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/880098232","repostId":"1199989573","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2203,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":817973254,"gmtCreate":1630901846778,"gmtModify":1676530416677,"author":{"id":"3572310408162611","authorId":"3572310408162611","name":"Vanillin","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/42bb976aee4ad7669c027cd08d6aee51","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3572310408162611","authorIdStr":"3572310408162611"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Sell&nbsp;when others are greedy and buy when there’s fear.. It’s just&nbsp;so hard to resist the gravy train","listText":"Sell&nbsp;when others are greedy and buy when there’s fear.. It’s just&nbsp;so hard to resist the gravy train","text":"Sell when others are greedy and buy when there’s fear.. It’s just so hard to resist the gravy train","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/817973254","repostId":"1121539570","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":982,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":812347345,"gmtCreate":1630557119087,"gmtModify":1676530339864,"author":{"id":"3572310408162611","authorId":"3572310408162611","name":"Vanillin","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/42bb976aee4ad7669c027cd08d6aee51","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3572310408162611","authorIdStr":"3572310408162611"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"I hope he gets to keep his job.. and we will have some good bargains&nbsp;","listText":"I hope he gets to keep his job.. and we will have some good bargains&nbsp;","text":"I hope he gets to keep his job.. and we will have some good bargains","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/812347345","repostId":"1110833427","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1110833427","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1630545932,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1110833427?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-09-02 09:25","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Citi's Levkovich Admits \"Significant\" Mistakes In Bearish S&P Call, But Sticks With 4,000 Year-End Target","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1110833427","media":"zerohedge","summary":"Last Friday, Powell's unexpectedly dovish Jackson Hole speech sparked another melt-up in risk assets","content":"<p>Last Friday, Powell's&nbsp;unexpectedly&nbsp;dovish Jackson Hole speech sparked another melt-up in risk assets.</p>\n<p>Ahead of the latest rally, Wall Street's most bearish strategists such as Citigroup's top strategist Tobias Levkovich, had issued multiple dire warnings about a&nbsp;euphoria on Wall Street&nbsp;and how markets&nbsp;resemble 1999. His year-end equity call for the S&amp;P 500 is 4,000 but has been forced to acknowledge in a note to clients he's made \"significant\" mistakes in his prediction.</p>\n<p>Levkovich is still holding to his guns and predicting the benchmark will end this year at 4,000 before reaching 4,350 by June 2022.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/233e706438c7821d08da6e99c1d003cd\" tg-width=\"1161\" tg-height=\"514\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">Supporting Levkovich's bearish views are striking \"parallels between current conditions and those of 1999.\"</p>\n<p>As shown in Panic/Euphoria Model - which considers factors including the number of investor positions anticipating a fall in stocks, levels have exceeded the Dot Com period.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b7032afec5da466f9c8d247282d9d16a\" tg-width=\"1068\" tg-height=\"783\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">Besides stock market euphoria, stretched valuations, and a planned tax increase will deteriorate corporate profits, there have been other reasons for Levkovich's bearishness.</p>\n<p><b><i>\"Caution that proves to be wrong can cost one a career,\"</i></b><i>Levkovich told clients in a note last week, quoted by Bloomberg.</i><b><i>\"Nevertheless, we feel compelled to stand by our analytical process.\"</i></b></p>\n<p>In term's of valuations,&nbsp;Levkovich is right - equities are way overvalued compared to historical norms.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a9b9f65689e75f8a52c80370d0a8ccf2\" tg-width=\"1151\" tg-height=\"520\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">Levkovich added that crazed retail chasing any stock that moves amid unprecedented Federal Reserve bond-buying, suppressing volatility and enabling high amounts of speculation, could peak when the central bank is poised to rein in its asset purchases. Investors should expect multiples to come back in.</p>\n<blockquote>\n <i>\"We suspect that these items may not be drivers going forward and other factors including euphoric sentiment and stretched valuation become more impactful, offset to some degree by reinvigorated share repurchase programs,\" he said. \"The stock market needs to consolidate the past 18 months' worth of gains and portfolio managers require more visibility into 2022 profits.\"</i>\n</blockquote>\n<p>Mike Wilson, the chief U.S. equity strategist at&nbsp;Morgan Stanley,&nbsp;is in the same camp as Levkovich, who expects a 10%+ S&amp;P 500 correction. Two weeks ago, Wilsonreluctantly raised his S&amp;P price targetto 4,000 from 3,900. Meanwhile, Goldman's David Kostin is on the opposite side of the bet, last month hiking his year-end S&amp;P price target from 4300 to 4,700, up about 7% from here, justifying his optimism byunexpectedly low bond yields which traditionally<i><b>represent a slowing economy.</b></i>In other words, stocks will rise because the economy will slow from here. Just brilliant.</p>\n<p>Here's where the&nbsp;equity strategist stand with their S&amp;P 500 year-end targets.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8592b798abc81df38132b731c86a756b\" tg-width=\"641\" tg-height=\"509\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">And before one mock either of the strategists, it's worth reminding that this market remains a<s>joke</s>\"mystery\" to all: as Steve Chiavarone, a portfolio manager and head of multi-asset solutions at Federated Hermes,told Bloomberglast week, “If someone would have told me in March of last year, when Covid was first rearing its ugly head, that 18 months later we would have case counts that are as high—if not higher—than they were on that day, but that the market would have doubled over that 18-month period, I would have laughed at them.”</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Citi's Levkovich Admits \"Significant\" Mistakes In Bearish S&P Call, But Sticks With 4,000 Year-End Target</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nCiti's Levkovich Admits \"Significant\" Mistakes In Bearish S&P Call, But Sticks With 4,000 Year-End Target\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-09-02 09:25 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/citis-levkovich-tells-clients-significant-mistakes-bearish-sp-500-call-sticks-4000-year-end><strong>zerohedge</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Last Friday, Powell's unexpectedly dovish Jackson Hole speech sparked another melt-up in risk assets.\nAhead of the latest rally, Wall Street's most bearish strategists such as Citigroup's top ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/citis-levkovich-tells-clients-significant-mistakes-bearish-sp-500-call-sticks-4000-year-end\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SPY":"标普500ETF",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index"},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/citis-levkovich-tells-clients-significant-mistakes-bearish-sp-500-call-sticks-4000-year-end","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1110833427","content_text":"Last Friday, Powell's unexpectedly dovish Jackson Hole speech sparked another melt-up in risk assets.\nAhead of the latest rally, Wall Street's most bearish strategists such as Citigroup's top strategist Tobias Levkovich, had issued multiple dire warnings about a euphoria on Wall Street and how markets resemble 1999. His year-end equity call for the S&P 500 is 4,000 but has been forced to acknowledge in a note to clients he's made \"significant\" mistakes in his prediction.\nLevkovich is still holding to his guns and predicting the benchmark will end this year at 4,000 before reaching 4,350 by June 2022.\nSupporting Levkovich's bearish views are striking \"parallels between current conditions and those of 1999.\"\nAs shown in Panic/Euphoria Model - which considers factors including the number of investor positions anticipating a fall in stocks, levels have exceeded the Dot Com period.\nBesides stock market euphoria, stretched valuations, and a planned tax increase will deteriorate corporate profits, there have been other reasons for Levkovich's bearishness.\n\"Caution that proves to be wrong can cost one a career,\"Levkovich told clients in a note last week, quoted by Bloomberg.\"Nevertheless, we feel compelled to stand by our analytical process.\"\nIn term's of valuations, Levkovich is right - equities are way overvalued compared to historical norms.\nLevkovich added that crazed retail chasing any stock that moves amid unprecedented Federal Reserve bond-buying, suppressing volatility and enabling high amounts of speculation, could peak when the central bank is poised to rein in its asset purchases. Investors should expect multiples to come back in.\n\n\"We suspect that these items may not be drivers going forward and other factors including euphoric sentiment and stretched valuation become more impactful, offset to some degree by reinvigorated share repurchase programs,\" he said. \"The stock market needs to consolidate the past 18 months' worth of gains and portfolio managers require more visibility into 2022 profits.\"\n\nMike Wilson, the chief U.S. equity strategist at Morgan Stanley, is in the same camp as Levkovich, who expects a 10%+ S&P 500 correction. Two weeks ago, Wilsonreluctantly raised his S&P price targetto 4,000 from 3,900. Meanwhile, Goldman's David Kostin is on the opposite side of the bet, last month hiking his year-end S&P price target from 4300 to 4,700, up about 7% from here, justifying his optimism byunexpectedly low bond yields which traditionallyrepresent a slowing economy.In other words, stocks will rise because the economy will slow from here. Just brilliant.\nHere's where the equity strategist stand with their S&P 500 year-end targets.\nAnd before one mock either of the strategists, it's worth reminding that this market remains ajoke\"mystery\" to all: as Steve Chiavarone, a portfolio manager and head of multi-asset solutions at Federated Hermes,told Bloomberglast week, “If someone would have told me in March of last year, when Covid was first rearing its ugly head, that 18 months later we would have case counts that are as high—if not higher—than they were on that day, but that the market would have doubled over that 18-month period, I would have laughed at them.”","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".SPX":0.9,"SPY":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":750,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[{"author":{"id":"3582677971530678","authorId":"3582677971530678","name":"BlueDaisy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0747094283743978b62fb8b1ee2cf44c","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3582677971530678","authorIdStr":"3582677971530678"},"content":"Ya... It will be nice to have some meaningful corrections along the way","text":"Ya... It will be nice to have some meaningful corrections along the way","html":"Ya... It will be nice to have some meaningful corrections along the way"}],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":818071623,"gmtCreate":1630368387162,"gmtModify":1676530281124,"author":{"id":"3572310408162611","authorId":"3572310408162611","name":"Vanillin","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/42bb976aee4ad7669c027cd08d6aee51","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3572310408162611","authorIdStr":"3572310408162611"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Apple services should play important role in&nbsp;AAPL future. I still haven’t able to see how it can effectively take on the likes of Spotify and Netflix. This is a case of a&nbsp;elephant in the&nbsp;room.","listText":"Apple services should play important role in&nbsp;AAPL future. I still haven’t able to see how it can effectively take on the likes of Spotify and Netflix. This is a case of a&nbsp;elephant in the&nbsp;room.","text":"Apple services should play important role in AAPL future. I still haven’t able to see how it can effectively take on the likes of Spotify and Netflix. This is a case of a elephant in the room.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/818071623","repostId":"1110468761","repostType":2,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1384,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":838777287,"gmtCreate":1629433494849,"gmtModify":1676530040118,"author":{"id":"3572310408162611","authorId":"3572310408162611","name":"Vanillin","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/42bb976aee4ad7669c027cd08d6aee51","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3572310408162611","authorIdStr":"3572310408162611"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good to keep some powder dry..&nbsp;","listText":"Good to keep some powder dry..&nbsp;","text":"Good to keep some powder dry..","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/838777287","repostId":"2160884793","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2160884793","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1629429639,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2160884793?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-08-20 11:20","market":"us","language":"en","title":"'Something will give' in U.S. stock market amid 'discomforting sentiment signals,' Citi warns","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2160884793","media":"MarketWatch","summary":"'The Street is too complacent,' say Citi analysts\nCiti analysts 'discern some clouds on the horizon,","content":"<p>'The Street is too complacent,' say Citi analysts</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2b2b9e64f6cb727f681071e88726285b\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"467\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>Citi analysts 'discern some clouds on the horizon,' warning that the bank's panic/euphoria model signals losses are coming for stocks.</span></p>\n<p>A U.S. stock-market pullback of 10% \"seems quite reasonable\" and any catalyst for weakness should be closely watched as valuations are no longer attractive amid a long stretch of \"discomforting sentiment signals,\" according to Citigroup analysts.</p>\n<p>\"Our panic/euphoria model remains very elevated and is warning of coming losses,\" the analysts said in a Citi research note after markets closed Wednesday. \"This is the longest period of ebullient readings without a market correction since 1999/2000 and we anticipate that something will give.\"</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/25999badfb9afac9ab54f5855e6b6536\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"552\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>CITI RESEARCH NOTE ON U.S. STRATEGY</span></p>\n<p>The U.S. stock market has seen an unusual number of new all-time highs this year.</p>\n<p>\"The Street is too complacent,\" the Citi analysts warned. \"Intriguingly, we find our conversations with clients to have a qualitative element of not worrying about higher taxes,\" or the Federal Reserve tapering its bond purchases, or inflation -- despite a June survey finding that more than half thought inflation could prove \"sticky\" in lasting as long as 12 months.</p>\n<p>In a note this week, Darrell Cronk, chief investment officer of Wells Fargo &amp; Co.'s wealth and investment management division, put inflation at the top of his list of 10 market risks while noting the S&amp;P 500 index has soared in the pandemic without a pullback of at least 5% since last October.</p>\n<p>U.S. stocks were mixed on Thursday. Major benchmarks had closed lower the day before as investors reacted in part to the release Wednesday afternoon of the Fed's policy meeting minutes, which showed most of its top officials considered it appropriate to begin slowing its pace of monthly bond purchases later this year.</p>\n<p>But some Wall Street analysts already had been anticipating that tapering could begin as soon as this year , and Cronk said in his note that \"it is time to begin removing emergency monetary policy.\"</p>\n<p>The S&amp;P 500 index rose 0.1% on Thursday, while the Dow Jones Industrial Average fell&nbsp;nearly 0.2% and the Nasdaq Composite rose&nbsp;0.1%.</p>\n<p>Citi's \"panic/euphoria model\" has signaled \"overly bullish investors\" for many months, the bank's analysts said. \"A pullback may be imminent especially as earnings growth slows.\"</p>\n<p>Companies' earnings reports for the second quarter have largely been strong , with many investors pointing to the results as an example of peak growth in the economic rebound from the Covid-19 crisis of 2020.</p>\n<p>Meanwhile, Goldman Sachs Group economists have lowered their forecast for third-quarter U.S. growth to 5.5% from 9%, citing the larger-than-expected impact of the delta variant of the coronavirus on the economic expansion and inflation.</p>\n<p>Citi's economic surprise index has \"slumped\" for major economies, according to the bank's research report. \"The delta variant may be the cause of the recent declines alongside supply chain disruptions, but it is bothersome and could translate into earnings issues down the line,\" the Citi analysts wrote in the note.</p>\n<p>\"We can discern some clouds on the horizon,\" they said.</p>","source":"lsy1603348471595","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>'Something will give' in U.S. stock market amid 'discomforting sentiment signals,' Citi warns</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n'Something will give' in U.S. stock market amid 'discomforting sentiment signals,' Citi warns\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-08-20 11:20 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.marketwatch.com/story/something-will-give-in-u-s-stock-market-amid-discomforting-sentiment-signals-citi-warns-11629393465?mod=home-page><strong>MarketWatch</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>'The Street is too complacent,' say Citi analysts\nCiti analysts 'discern some clouds on the horizon,' warning that the bank's panic/euphoria model signals losses are coming for stocks.\nA U.S. stock-...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/something-will-give-in-u-s-stock-market-amid-discomforting-sentiment-signals-citi-warns-11629393465?mod=home-page\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index"},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/something-will-give-in-u-s-stock-market-amid-discomforting-sentiment-signals-citi-warns-11629393465?mod=home-page","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2160884793","content_text":"'The Street is too complacent,' say Citi analysts\nCiti analysts 'discern some clouds on the horizon,' warning that the bank's panic/euphoria model signals losses are coming for stocks.\nA U.S. stock-market pullback of 10% \"seems quite reasonable\" and any catalyst for weakness should be closely watched as valuations are no longer attractive amid a long stretch of \"discomforting sentiment signals,\" according to Citigroup analysts.\n\"Our panic/euphoria model remains very elevated and is warning of coming losses,\" the analysts said in a Citi research note after markets closed Wednesday. \"This is the longest period of ebullient readings without a market correction since 1999/2000 and we anticipate that something will give.\"\nCITI RESEARCH NOTE ON U.S. STRATEGY\nThe U.S. stock market has seen an unusual number of new all-time highs this year.\n\"The Street is too complacent,\" the Citi analysts warned. \"Intriguingly, we find our conversations with clients to have a qualitative element of not worrying about higher taxes,\" or the Federal Reserve tapering its bond purchases, or inflation -- despite a June survey finding that more than half thought inflation could prove \"sticky\" in lasting as long as 12 months.\nIn a note this week, Darrell Cronk, chief investment officer of Wells Fargo & Co.'s wealth and investment management division, put inflation at the top of his list of 10 market risks while noting the S&P 500 index has soared in the pandemic without a pullback of at least 5% since last October.\nU.S. stocks were mixed on Thursday. Major benchmarks had closed lower the day before as investors reacted in part to the release Wednesday afternoon of the Fed's policy meeting minutes, which showed most of its top officials considered it appropriate to begin slowing its pace of monthly bond purchases later this year.\nBut some Wall Street analysts already had been anticipating that tapering could begin as soon as this year , and Cronk said in his note that \"it is time to begin removing emergency monetary policy.\"\nThe S&P 500 index rose 0.1% on Thursday, while the Dow Jones Industrial Average fell nearly 0.2% and the Nasdaq Composite rose 0.1%.\nCiti's \"panic/euphoria model\" has signaled \"overly bullish investors\" for many months, the bank's analysts said. \"A pullback may be imminent especially as earnings growth slows.\"\nCompanies' earnings reports for the second quarter have largely been strong , with many investors pointing to the results as an example of peak growth in the economic rebound from the Covid-19 crisis of 2020.\nMeanwhile, Goldman Sachs Group economists have lowered their forecast for third-quarter U.S. growth to 5.5% from 9%, citing the larger-than-expected impact of the delta variant of the coronavirus on the economic expansion and inflation.\nCiti's economic surprise index has \"slumped\" for major economies, according to the bank's research report. \"The delta variant may be the cause of the recent declines alongside supply chain disruptions, but it is bothersome and could translate into earnings issues down the line,\" the Citi analysts wrote in the note.\n\"We can discern some clouds on the horizon,\" they said.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".DJI":0.9,".SPX":0.9,".IXIC":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":591,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":838072009,"gmtCreate":1629361858901,"gmtModify":1676530015340,"author":{"id":"3572310408162611","authorId":"3572310408162611","name":"Vanillin","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/42bb976aee4ad7669c027cd08d6aee51","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3572310408162611","authorIdStr":"3572310408162611"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"They&nbsp;have strong cash flow but I think it will take awhile for investors to regain confidence investing into Chinese companies.&nbsp;","listText":"They&nbsp;have strong cash flow but I think it will take awhile for investors to regain confidence investing into Chinese companies.&nbsp;","text":"They have strong cash flow but I think it will take awhile for investors to regain confidence investing into Chinese companies.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/838072009","repostId":"1119697793","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":622,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[{"author":{"id":"3574823700698255","authorId":"3574823700698255","name":"starry123","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/87d54ddf9f429d363c691c937e6c97a4","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"idStr":"3574823700698255","authorIdStr":"3574823700698255"},"content":"how long for it take for investors to regain confidence? 1 year , 2 years or 10 years? I'm very disappointed now","text":"how long for it take for investors to regain confidence? 1 year , 2 years or 10 years? I'm very disappointed now","html":"how long for it take for investors to regain confidence? 1 year , 2 years or 10 years? I'm very disappointed now"}],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":833186014,"gmtCreate":1629210498638,"gmtModify":1676529967779,"author":{"id":"3572310408162611","authorId":"3572310408162611","name":"Vanillin","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/42bb976aee4ad7669c027cd08d6aee51","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3572310408162611","authorIdStr":"3572310408162611"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Amazing growth story&nbsp;","listText":"Amazing growth story&nbsp;","text":"Amazing growth story","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/833186014","repostId":"1179512227","repostType":2,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":759,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":894391458,"gmtCreate":1628792462974,"gmtModify":1676529856847,"author":{"id":"3572310408162611","authorId":"3572310408162611","name":"Vanillin","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/42bb976aee4ad7669c027cd08d6aee51","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3572310408162611","authorIdStr":"3572310408162611"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Great results!&nbsp;","listText":"Great results!&nbsp;","text":"Great results!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/894391458","repostId":"1195651017","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1195651017","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1628638405,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1195651017?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-08-11 07:33","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Toplines After Hours US Market on Tuesday","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1195651017","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"U.S. stock index futures were flat during overnight trading on Tuesday, after the Dow and S&P 500 cl","content":"<p>U.S. stock index futures were flat during overnight trading on Tuesday, after the Dow and S&amp;P 500 closed at&nbsp;record highs&nbsp;following the Senate passing the$1 trillion infrastructure bill.</p>\n<p>Futures contracts tied to the <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/.DJI\">DJIA</a> were slightly higher. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/.SPX\">S&amp;P 500</a> futures and Nasdaq 100 futures were flat.</p>\n<p>At 7:30&nbsp;p.m. ET, Dow e-minis were down 14 points, or 0.04%, S&amp;P 500 e-minis were down 2.50 points, or 0.06%, and Nasdaq 100 e-minis were down 8.25 points, or 0.05%.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bb78d3b983aa4d779cf3b1bdc234bd42\" tg-width=\"1125\" tg-height=\"413\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p><b>Stocks making the biggest moves after hours:</b></p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/WW\">Weight Watchers International Inc</a>&nbsp;23.2% LOWER; reported Q2 EPS of $0.12, which may not compare to the analyst estimate of $0.65. Revenue for the quarter came in at $311 million versus the consensus estimate of $337.1 million.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/UPST\">Upstart Holdings, Inc.</a> 17.9% HIGHER; reported Q2 EPS of $0.62, $0.37 better than the analyst estimate of $0.25. Revenue for the quarter came in at $194 million versus the consensus estimate of $157.76 million. Upstart Holdings sees Q3 2021 revenue of $205-215 million, versus the consensus of $161.6 million.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ONTF\">ON24, Inc.</a> 14.9% LOWER; reported Q2 EPS of $0.04, $0.04 better than the analyst estimate of $0.00. Revenue for the quarter came in at $52.1 million versus the consensus estimate of $51.03 million. ON24, Inc. sees Q3 2021 EPS of ($0.09)-($0.07), versus the consensus of ($0.05). ON24, Inc. sees Q3 2021 revenue of $47.5-48.5 million, versus the consensus of $51.2 million. ON24, Inc. sees FY2021 EPS of ($0.13)-($0.06), versus the consensus of ($0.04). ON24, Inc. sees FY2021 revenue of $201.2-204.2 million, versus the consensus of $209.2 million.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LPRO\">Open Lending Corporation</a> 18.2% HIGHER; reported Q2 EPS of $0.60, $0.43 better than the analyst estimate of $0.17. Revenue for the quarter came in at $61.1 million versus the consensus estimate of $48.98 million. Open Lending Corp. sees FY2021 revenue of $184-234 million, versus the consensus of $216 million.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FUBO\">fuboTV Inc.</a> 12.1% HIGHER; reported Q2 EPS of ($0.38), $0.12 better than the analyst estimate of ($0.50). Revenue for the quarter came in at $130.9 million versus the consensus estimate of $118.88 million. fuboTV Inc. sees Q3 2021 revenue of $140-144 million, versus the consensus of $126.9 million. fuboTV Inc. sees FY2021 revenue of $560-570 million, versus the consensus of $531.7 million.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MRVI\">Maravai LifeSciences Holdings, Inc.</a> 7.4% HIGHER; reported Q2 EPS of $0.44, $0.13 better than the analyst estimate of $0.31. Revenue for the quarter came in at $217.8 million versus the consensus estimate of $192.29 million. Maravai LifeSciences sees FY2021 revenue of $745-770 million, versus the consensus of $709.65 million.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TDUP\">ThredUp Inc.</a> 7.3% HIGHER; Another record-setting quarter with 27% year-over-year revenue growth</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GTES\">Gates Industrial Corp PLC</a> 6.2% LOWER; announced today that certain selling stockholders affiliated with The Blackstone Group Inc. have commenced a secondary offering of 25,000,000 of Gates' ordinary shares. In connection with the offering, the selling stockholders intend to grant to the underwriters a 30-day option to purchase up to 3,750,000 additional ordinary shares.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SKIN\">The Beauty Health Corp.</a> 5.3% HIGHER; reported Q2 EPS of ($1.52), versus ($0.30) reported last year. Revenue for the quarter came in at $66.5 million, versus $14.1 million reported last year.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MCFE\">McAfee Corp.</a> 3.8% HIGHER; reported Q2 EPS of $0.21, $0.03 better than the analyst estimate of $0.18. Revenue for the quarter came in at $467 million versus the consensus estimate of $433.99 million. McAfee Corp. sees Q3 2021 revenue of $461-467 million, versus the consensus of $442.8 million. McAfee Corp. sees FY2021 revenue of $1.84-1.85 billion, versus the consensus of $1.79 billion.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/OLO\">Olo Inc.</a> 3.7% LOWER; reported Q2 EPS of $0.03, $0.02 better than the analyst estimate of $0.01. Revenue for the quarter came in at $35.9 million versus the consensus estimate of $34.03 million. Olo Inc. sees Q3 2021 revenue of $36-36.5 million, versus the consensus of $34.65 million. Olo Inc. sees FY2021 revenue of $144.7-145.7 million, versus the consensus of $140.78 million.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LU\">Lufax</a> 1.9% HIGHER;&nbsp;Morgan Stanley&nbsp;upgraded from Equalweight to Overweight with a price target of $13.00 (from $14.80).</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/COIN\">Coinbase Global, Inc.</a> 0.7% HIGHER; reported Q2 EPS of $6.42, $4.18 better than the analyst estimate of $2.24. Revenue for the quarter came in at $2.23 billion versus the consensus estimate of $1.77 billion.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Toplines After Hours US Market on Tuesday</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nToplines After Hours US Market on Tuesday\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-08-11 07:33</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>U.S. stock index futures were flat during overnight trading on Tuesday, after the Dow and S&amp;P 500 closed at&nbsp;record highs&nbsp;following the Senate passing the$1 trillion infrastructure bill.</p>\n<p>Futures contracts tied to the <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/.DJI\">DJIA</a> were slightly higher. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/.SPX\">S&amp;P 500</a> futures and Nasdaq 100 futures were flat.</p>\n<p>At 7:30&nbsp;p.m. ET, Dow e-minis were down 14 points, or 0.04%, S&amp;P 500 e-minis were down 2.50 points, or 0.06%, and Nasdaq 100 e-minis were down 8.25 points, or 0.05%.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bb78d3b983aa4d779cf3b1bdc234bd42\" tg-width=\"1125\" tg-height=\"413\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p><b>Stocks making the biggest moves after hours:</b></p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/WW\">Weight Watchers International Inc</a>&nbsp;23.2% LOWER; reported Q2 EPS of $0.12, which may not compare to the analyst estimate of $0.65. Revenue for the quarter came in at $311 million versus the consensus estimate of $337.1 million.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/UPST\">Upstart Holdings, Inc.</a> 17.9% HIGHER; reported Q2 EPS of $0.62, $0.37 better than the analyst estimate of $0.25. Revenue for the quarter came in at $194 million versus the consensus estimate of $157.76 million. Upstart Holdings sees Q3 2021 revenue of $205-215 million, versus the consensus of $161.6 million.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ONTF\">ON24, Inc.</a> 14.9% LOWER; reported Q2 EPS of $0.04, $0.04 better than the analyst estimate of $0.00. Revenue for the quarter came in at $52.1 million versus the consensus estimate of $51.03 million. ON24, Inc. sees Q3 2021 EPS of ($0.09)-($0.07), versus the consensus of ($0.05). ON24, Inc. sees Q3 2021 revenue of $47.5-48.5 million, versus the consensus of $51.2 million. ON24, Inc. sees FY2021 EPS of ($0.13)-($0.06), versus the consensus of ($0.04). ON24, Inc. sees FY2021 revenue of $201.2-204.2 million, versus the consensus of $209.2 million.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LPRO\">Open Lending Corporation</a> 18.2% HIGHER; reported Q2 EPS of $0.60, $0.43 better than the analyst estimate of $0.17. Revenue for the quarter came in at $61.1 million versus the consensus estimate of $48.98 million. Open Lending Corp. sees FY2021 revenue of $184-234 million, versus the consensus of $216 million.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FUBO\">fuboTV Inc.</a> 12.1% HIGHER; reported Q2 EPS of ($0.38), $0.12 better than the analyst estimate of ($0.50). Revenue for the quarter came in at $130.9 million versus the consensus estimate of $118.88 million. fuboTV Inc. sees Q3 2021 revenue of $140-144 million, versus the consensus of $126.9 million. fuboTV Inc. sees FY2021 revenue of $560-570 million, versus the consensus of $531.7 million.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MRVI\">Maravai LifeSciences Holdings, Inc.</a> 7.4% HIGHER; reported Q2 EPS of $0.44, $0.13 better than the analyst estimate of $0.31. Revenue for the quarter came in at $217.8 million versus the consensus estimate of $192.29 million. Maravai LifeSciences sees FY2021 revenue of $745-770 million, versus the consensus of $709.65 million.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TDUP\">ThredUp Inc.</a> 7.3% HIGHER; Another record-setting quarter with 27% year-over-year revenue growth</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GTES\">Gates Industrial Corp PLC</a> 6.2% LOWER; announced today that certain selling stockholders affiliated with The Blackstone Group Inc. have commenced a secondary offering of 25,000,000 of Gates' ordinary shares. In connection with the offering, the selling stockholders intend to grant to the underwriters a 30-day option to purchase up to 3,750,000 additional ordinary shares.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SKIN\">The Beauty Health Corp.</a> 5.3% HIGHER; reported Q2 EPS of ($1.52), versus ($0.30) reported last year. Revenue for the quarter came in at $66.5 million, versus $14.1 million reported last year.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MCFE\">McAfee Corp.</a> 3.8% HIGHER; reported Q2 EPS of $0.21, $0.03 better than the analyst estimate of $0.18. Revenue for the quarter came in at $467 million versus the consensus estimate of $433.99 million. McAfee Corp. sees Q3 2021 revenue of $461-467 million, versus the consensus of $442.8 million. McAfee Corp. sees FY2021 revenue of $1.84-1.85 billion, versus the consensus of $1.79 billion.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/OLO\">Olo Inc.</a> 3.7% LOWER; reported Q2 EPS of $0.03, $0.02 better than the analyst estimate of $0.01. Revenue for the quarter came in at $35.9 million versus the consensus estimate of $34.03 million. Olo Inc. sees Q3 2021 revenue of $36-36.5 million, versus the consensus of $34.65 million. Olo Inc. sees FY2021 revenue of $144.7-145.7 million, versus the consensus of $140.78 million.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LU\">Lufax</a> 1.9% HIGHER;&nbsp;Morgan Stanley&nbsp;upgraded from Equalweight to Overweight with a price target of $13.00 (from $14.80).</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/COIN\">Coinbase Global, Inc.</a> 0.7% HIGHER; reported Q2 EPS of $6.42, $4.18 better than the analyst estimate of $2.24. Revenue for the quarter came in at $2.23 billion versus the consensus estimate of $1.77 billion.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TDUP":"ThredUp Inc.","GTES":"Gates Industrial Corp PLC",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","NDX":"纳斯达克100指数","COIN":"Coinbase Global, Inc.","LU":"陆金所","ONTF":"ON24, Inc.","UPST":"Upstart Holdings, Inc.","LPRO":"Open Lending Corporation","SKIN":"The Beauty Health Corp.","MRVI":"Maravai LifeSciences Holdings, Inc.","FUBO":"fuboTV Inc.","OLO":"PowerShares DB Crude Oil Long ET","WW":"WW International, Inc.",".DJI":"道琼斯","MCFE":"McAfee Corp."},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1195651017","content_text":"U.S. stock index futures were flat during overnight trading on Tuesday, after the Dow and S&P 500 closed at record highs following the Senate passing the$1 trillion infrastructure bill.\nFutures contracts tied to the DJIA were slightly higher. S&P 500 futures and Nasdaq 100 futures were flat.\nAt 7:30 p.m. ET, Dow e-minis were down 14 points, or 0.04%, S&P 500 e-minis were down 2.50 points, or 0.06%, and Nasdaq 100 e-minis were down 8.25 points, or 0.05%.\nStocks making the biggest moves after hours:\nWeight Watchers International Inc 23.2% LOWER; reported Q2 EPS of $0.12, which may not compare to the analyst estimate of $0.65. Revenue for the quarter came in at $311 million versus the consensus estimate of $337.1 million.\nUpstart Holdings, Inc. 17.9% HIGHER; reported Q2 EPS of $0.62, $0.37 better than the analyst estimate of $0.25. Revenue for the quarter came in at $194 million versus the consensus estimate of $157.76 million. Upstart Holdings sees Q3 2021 revenue of $205-215 million, versus the consensus of $161.6 million.\nON24, Inc. 14.9% LOWER; reported Q2 EPS of $0.04, $0.04 better than the analyst estimate of $0.00. Revenue for the quarter came in at $52.1 million versus the consensus estimate of $51.03 million. ON24, Inc. sees Q3 2021 EPS of ($0.09)-($0.07), versus the consensus of ($0.05). ON24, Inc. sees Q3 2021 revenue of $47.5-48.5 million, versus the consensus of $51.2 million. ON24, Inc. sees FY2021 EPS of ($0.13)-($0.06), versus the consensus of ($0.04). ON24, Inc. sees FY2021 revenue of $201.2-204.2 million, versus the consensus of $209.2 million.\nOpen Lending Corporation 18.2% HIGHER; reported Q2 EPS of $0.60, $0.43 better than the analyst estimate of $0.17. Revenue for the quarter came in at $61.1 million versus the consensus estimate of $48.98 million. Open Lending Corp. sees FY2021 revenue of $184-234 million, versus the consensus of $216 million.\nfuboTV Inc. 12.1% HIGHER; reported Q2 EPS of ($0.38), $0.12 better than the analyst estimate of ($0.50). Revenue for the quarter came in at $130.9 million versus the consensus estimate of $118.88 million. fuboTV Inc. sees Q3 2021 revenue of $140-144 million, versus the consensus of $126.9 million. fuboTV Inc. sees FY2021 revenue of $560-570 million, versus the consensus of $531.7 million.\nMaravai LifeSciences Holdings, Inc. 7.4% HIGHER; reported Q2 EPS of $0.44, $0.13 better than the analyst estimate of $0.31. Revenue for the quarter came in at $217.8 million versus the consensus estimate of $192.29 million. Maravai LifeSciences sees FY2021 revenue of $745-770 million, versus the consensus of $709.65 million.\nThredUp Inc. 7.3% HIGHER; Another record-setting quarter with 27% year-over-year revenue growth\nGates Industrial Corp PLC 6.2% LOWER; announced today that certain selling stockholders affiliated with The Blackstone Group Inc. have commenced a secondary offering of 25,000,000 of Gates' ordinary shares. In connection with the offering, the selling stockholders intend to grant to the underwriters a 30-day option to purchase up to 3,750,000 additional ordinary shares.\nThe Beauty Health Corp. 5.3% HIGHER; reported Q2 EPS of ($1.52), versus ($0.30) reported last year. Revenue for the quarter came in at $66.5 million, versus $14.1 million reported last year.\nMcAfee Corp. 3.8% HIGHER; reported Q2 EPS of $0.21, $0.03 better than the analyst estimate of $0.18. Revenue for the quarter came in at $467 million versus the consensus estimate of $433.99 million. McAfee Corp. sees Q3 2021 revenue of $461-467 million, versus the consensus of $442.8 million. McAfee Corp. sees FY2021 revenue of $1.84-1.85 billion, versus the consensus of $1.79 billion.\nOlo Inc. 3.7% LOWER; reported Q2 EPS of $0.03, $0.02 better than the analyst estimate of $0.01. Revenue for the quarter came in at $35.9 million versus the consensus estimate of $34.03 million. Olo Inc. sees Q3 2021 revenue of $36-36.5 million, versus the consensus of $34.65 million. Olo Inc. sees FY2021 revenue of $144.7-145.7 million, versus the consensus of $140.78 million.\nLufax 1.9% HIGHER; Morgan Stanley upgraded from Equalweight to Overweight with a price target of $13.00 (from $14.80).\nCoinbase Global, Inc. 0.7% HIGHER; reported Q2 EPS of $6.42, $4.18 better than the analyst estimate of $2.24. Revenue for the quarter came in at $2.23 billion versus the consensus estimate of $1.77 billion.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"FUBO":0.9,"LU":0.9,"MCFE":0.9,"OLO":0.9,"SKIN":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,".SPX":0.9,"WW":0.9,"NDX":0.9,"ONTF":0.9,".DJI":0.9,"MRVI":0.9,"TDUP":0.9,"UPST":0.9,"GTES":0.9,"COIN":0.9,"LPRO":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":705,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":894393406,"gmtCreate":1628791999105,"gmtModify":1676529856821,"author":{"id":"3572310408162611","authorId":"3572310408162611","name":"Vanillin","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/42bb976aee4ad7669c027cd08d6aee51","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3572310408162611","authorIdStr":"3572310408162611"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Regulatory woes [Cry]&nbsp;","listText":"Regulatory woes [Cry]&nbsp;","text":"Regulatory woes [Cry]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/894393406","repostId":"2158256229","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2158256229","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1628762054,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2158256229?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-08-12 17:54","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Baidu revenue tops estimates on ad sales rebound","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2158256229","media":"Reuters","summary":"(Reuters) -China's Baidu Inc reported quarterly revenue above Wall Street estimates on Thursday, buo","content":"<p>(Reuters) -China's Baidu Inc reported quarterly revenue above Wall Street estimates on Thursday, buoyed by a rebound in advertising sales and higher demand for its artificial intelligence and cloud products.</p>\n<p>Baidu also said Chief Financial Officer (CFO) Herman Yu has been appointed as the company's chief strategy officer and will continue to serve as CFO until a successor is appointed.</p>\n<p>Demand for the company's rapidly growing autonomous driving service and artificial intelligence-powered cloud products has helped diversify its revenue sources and offset competition from giants like Alibaba and ByteDance in its core search platform.</p>\n<p>The company, also known as China's Google, said total revenue rose to 31.35 billion yuan ($4.84 billion) from 26.03 billion yuan in the second quarter ended June 30, topping analysts' average estimate of 30.96 billion yuan, according to IBES data from Refinitiv.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Baidu revenue tops estimates on ad sales rebound</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBaidu revenue tops estimates on ad sales rebound\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-08-12 17:54</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>(Reuters) -China's Baidu Inc reported quarterly revenue above Wall Street estimates on Thursday, buoyed by a rebound in advertising sales and higher demand for its artificial intelligence and cloud products.</p>\n<p>Baidu also said Chief Financial Officer (CFO) Herman Yu has been appointed as the company's chief strategy officer and will continue to serve as CFO until a successor is appointed.</p>\n<p>Demand for the company's rapidly growing autonomous driving service and artificial intelligence-powered cloud products has helped diversify its revenue sources and offset competition from giants like Alibaba and ByteDance in its core search platform.</p>\n<p>The company, also known as China's Google, said total revenue rose to 31.35 billion yuan ($4.84 billion) from 26.03 billion yuan in the second quarter ended June 30, topping analysts' average estimate of 30.96 billion yuan, according to IBES data from Refinitiv.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"09888":"百度集团-SW","BIDU":"百度"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2158256229","content_text":"(Reuters) -China's Baidu Inc reported quarterly revenue above Wall Street estimates on Thursday, buoyed by a rebound in advertising sales and higher demand for its artificial intelligence and cloud products.\nBaidu also said Chief Financial Officer (CFO) Herman Yu has been appointed as the company's chief strategy officer and will continue to serve as CFO until a successor is appointed.\nDemand for the company's rapidly growing autonomous driving service and artificial intelligence-powered cloud products has helped diversify its revenue sources and offset competition from giants like Alibaba and ByteDance in its core search platform.\nThe company, also known as China's Google, said total revenue rose to 31.35 billion yuan ($4.84 billion) from 26.03 billion yuan in the second quarter ended June 30, topping analysts' average estimate of 30.96 billion yuan, according to IBES data from Refinitiv.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"BIDU":0.9,"09888":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":883,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":893155149,"gmtCreate":1628249673281,"gmtModify":1703503933196,"author":{"id":"3572310408162611","authorId":"3572310408162611","name":"Vanillin","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/42bb976aee4ad7669c027cd08d6aee51","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3572310408162611","authorIdStr":"3572310408162611"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Check out their collab with Genius Sports.&nbsp;","listText":"Check out their collab with Genius Sports.&nbsp;","text":"Check out their collab with Genius Sports.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/893155149","repostId":"1180256775","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":689,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":173236378,"gmtCreate":1626661362794,"gmtModify":1703762892348,"author":{"id":"3572310408162611","authorId":"3572310408162611","name":"Vanillin","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/42bb976aee4ad7669c027cd08d6aee51","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3572310408162611","authorIdStr":"3572310408162611"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Too&nbsp;much competition in this space…&nbsp;","listText":"Too&nbsp;much competition in this space…&nbsp;","text":"Too much competition in this space…","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/173236378","repostId":"2152566633","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1104,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":179775324,"gmtCreate":1626581508068,"gmtModify":1703762017018,"author":{"id":"3572310408162611","authorId":"3572310408162611","name":"Vanillin","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/42bb976aee4ad7669c027cd08d6aee51","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3572310408162611","idStr":"3572310408162611"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Netflix content is way better than Disney+. I had Disney+ for 3 months and got bored watching it. NetFlix’s content is a lot more diverse and caters for a wider audience. Big plus for me, they have excellent Korean dramas.&nbsp;The secret sauce will be its foray into gaming on-demand. Looking forward to it.","listText":"Netflix content is way better than Disney+. I had Disney+ for 3 months and got bored watching it. NetFlix’s content is a lot more diverse and caters for a wider audience. Big plus for me, they have excellent Korean dramas.&nbsp;The secret sauce will be its foray into gaming on-demand. Looking forward to it.","text":"Netflix content is way better than Disney+. I had Disney+ for 3 months and got bored watching it. NetFlix’s content is a lot more diverse and caters for a wider audience. Big plus for me, they have excellent Korean dramas. The secret sauce will be its foray into gaming on-demand. Looking forward to it.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":12,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/179775324","repostId":"2152897876","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":518,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":812347345,"gmtCreate":1630557119087,"gmtModify":1676530339864,"author":{"id":"3572310408162611","authorId":"3572310408162611","name":"Vanillin","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/42bb976aee4ad7669c027cd08d6aee51","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3572310408162611","idStr":"3572310408162611"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"I hope he gets to keep his job.. and we will have some good bargains&nbsp;","listText":"I hope he gets to keep his job.. and we will have some good bargains&nbsp;","text":"I hope he gets to keep his job.. and we will have some good bargains","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/812347345","repostId":"1110833427","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1110833427","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1630545932,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1110833427?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-09-02 09:25","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Citi's Levkovich Admits \"Significant\" Mistakes In Bearish S&P Call, But Sticks With 4,000 Year-End Target","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1110833427","media":"zerohedge","summary":"Last Friday, Powell's unexpectedly dovish Jackson Hole speech sparked another melt-up in risk assets","content":"<p>Last Friday, Powell's&nbsp;unexpectedly&nbsp;dovish Jackson Hole speech sparked another melt-up in risk assets.</p>\n<p>Ahead of the latest rally, Wall Street's most bearish strategists such as Citigroup's top strategist Tobias Levkovich, had issued multiple dire warnings about a&nbsp;euphoria on Wall Street&nbsp;and how markets&nbsp;resemble 1999. His year-end equity call for the S&amp;P 500 is 4,000 but has been forced to acknowledge in a note to clients he's made \"significant\" mistakes in his prediction.</p>\n<p>Levkovich is still holding to his guns and predicting the benchmark will end this year at 4,000 before reaching 4,350 by June 2022.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/233e706438c7821d08da6e99c1d003cd\" tg-width=\"1161\" tg-height=\"514\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">Supporting Levkovich's bearish views are striking \"parallels between current conditions and those of 1999.\"</p>\n<p>As shown in Panic/Euphoria Model - which considers factors including the number of investor positions anticipating a fall in stocks, levels have exceeded the Dot Com period.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b7032afec5da466f9c8d247282d9d16a\" tg-width=\"1068\" tg-height=\"783\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">Besides stock market euphoria, stretched valuations, and a planned tax increase will deteriorate corporate profits, there have been other reasons for Levkovich's bearishness.</p>\n<p><b><i>\"Caution that proves to be wrong can cost one a career,\"</i></b><i>Levkovich told clients in a note last week, quoted by Bloomberg.</i><b><i>\"Nevertheless, we feel compelled to stand by our analytical process.\"</i></b></p>\n<p>In term's of valuations,&nbsp;Levkovich is right - equities are way overvalued compared to historical norms.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a9b9f65689e75f8a52c80370d0a8ccf2\" tg-width=\"1151\" tg-height=\"520\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">Levkovich added that crazed retail chasing any stock that moves amid unprecedented Federal Reserve bond-buying, suppressing volatility and enabling high amounts of speculation, could peak when the central bank is poised to rein in its asset purchases. Investors should expect multiples to come back in.</p>\n<blockquote>\n <i>\"We suspect that these items may not be drivers going forward and other factors including euphoric sentiment and stretched valuation become more impactful, offset to some degree by reinvigorated share repurchase programs,\" he said. \"The stock market needs to consolidate the past 18 months' worth of gains and portfolio managers require more visibility into 2022 profits.\"</i>\n</blockquote>\n<p>Mike Wilson, the chief U.S. equity strategist at&nbsp;Morgan Stanley,&nbsp;is in the same camp as Levkovich, who expects a 10%+ S&amp;P 500 correction. Two weeks ago, Wilsonreluctantly raised his S&amp;P price targetto 4,000 from 3,900. Meanwhile, Goldman's David Kostin is on the opposite side of the bet, last month hiking his year-end S&amp;P price target from 4300 to 4,700, up about 7% from here, justifying his optimism byunexpectedly low bond yields which traditionally<i><b>represent a slowing economy.</b></i>In other words, stocks will rise because the economy will slow from here. Just brilliant.</p>\n<p>Here's where the&nbsp;equity strategist stand with their S&amp;P 500 year-end targets.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8592b798abc81df38132b731c86a756b\" tg-width=\"641\" tg-height=\"509\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">And before one mock either of the strategists, it's worth reminding that this market remains a<s>joke</s>\"mystery\" to all: as Steve Chiavarone, a portfolio manager and head of multi-asset solutions at Federated Hermes,told Bloomberglast week, “If someone would have told me in March of last year, when Covid was first rearing its ugly head, that 18 months later we would have case counts that are as high—if not higher—than they were on that day, but that the market would have doubled over that 18-month period, I would have laughed at them.”</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Citi's Levkovich Admits \"Significant\" Mistakes In Bearish S&P Call, But Sticks With 4,000 Year-End Target</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nCiti's Levkovich Admits \"Significant\" Mistakes In Bearish S&P Call, But Sticks With 4,000 Year-End Target\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-09-02 09:25 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/citis-levkovich-tells-clients-significant-mistakes-bearish-sp-500-call-sticks-4000-year-end><strong>zerohedge</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Last Friday, Powell's unexpectedly dovish Jackson Hole speech sparked another melt-up in risk assets.\nAhead of the latest rally, Wall Street's most bearish strategists such as Citigroup's top ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/citis-levkovich-tells-clients-significant-mistakes-bearish-sp-500-call-sticks-4000-year-end\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SPY":"标普500ETF",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index"},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/citis-levkovich-tells-clients-significant-mistakes-bearish-sp-500-call-sticks-4000-year-end","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1110833427","content_text":"Last Friday, Powell's unexpectedly dovish Jackson Hole speech sparked another melt-up in risk assets.\nAhead of the latest rally, Wall Street's most bearish strategists such as Citigroup's top strategist Tobias Levkovich, had issued multiple dire warnings about a euphoria on Wall Street and how markets resemble 1999. His year-end equity call for the S&P 500 is 4,000 but has been forced to acknowledge in a note to clients he's made \"significant\" mistakes in his prediction.\nLevkovich is still holding to his guns and predicting the benchmark will end this year at 4,000 before reaching 4,350 by June 2022.\nSupporting Levkovich's bearish views are striking \"parallels between current conditions and those of 1999.\"\nAs shown in Panic/Euphoria Model - which considers factors including the number of investor positions anticipating a fall in stocks, levels have exceeded the Dot Com period.\nBesides stock market euphoria, stretched valuations, and a planned tax increase will deteriorate corporate profits, there have been other reasons for Levkovich's bearishness.\n\"Caution that proves to be wrong can cost one a career,\"Levkovich told clients in a note last week, quoted by Bloomberg.\"Nevertheless, we feel compelled to stand by our analytical process.\"\nIn term's of valuations, Levkovich is right - equities are way overvalued compared to historical norms.\nLevkovich added that crazed retail chasing any stock that moves amid unprecedented Federal Reserve bond-buying, suppressing volatility and enabling high amounts of speculation, could peak when the central bank is poised to rein in its asset purchases. Investors should expect multiples to come back in.\n\n\"We suspect that these items may not be drivers going forward and other factors including euphoric sentiment and stretched valuation become more impactful, offset to some degree by reinvigorated share repurchase programs,\" he said. \"The stock market needs to consolidate the past 18 months' worth of gains and portfolio managers require more visibility into 2022 profits.\"\n\nMike Wilson, the chief U.S. equity strategist at Morgan Stanley, is in the same camp as Levkovich, who expects a 10%+ S&P 500 correction. Two weeks ago, Wilsonreluctantly raised his S&P price targetto 4,000 from 3,900. Meanwhile, Goldman's David Kostin is on the opposite side of the bet, last month hiking his year-end S&P price target from 4300 to 4,700, up about 7% from here, justifying his optimism byunexpectedly low bond yields which traditionallyrepresent a slowing economy.In other words, stocks will rise because the economy will slow from here. Just brilliant.\nHere's where the equity strategist stand with their S&P 500 year-end targets.\nAnd before one mock either of the strategists, it's worth reminding that this market remains ajoke\"mystery\" to all: as Steve Chiavarone, a portfolio manager and head of multi-asset solutions at Federated Hermes,told Bloomberglast week, “If someone would have told me in March of last year, when Covid was first rearing its ugly head, that 18 months later we would have case counts that are as high—if not higher—than they were on that day, but that the market would have doubled over that 18-month period, I would have laughed at them.”","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".SPX":0.9,"SPY":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":750,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[{"author":{"id":"3582677971530678","authorId":"3582677971530678","name":"BlueDaisy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0747094283743978b62fb8b1ee2cf44c","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"3582677971530678","idStr":"3582677971530678"},"content":"Ya... It will be nice to have some meaningful corrections along the way","text":"Ya... It will be nice to have some meaningful corrections along the way","html":"Ya... It will be nice to have some meaningful corrections along the way"}],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9021284103,"gmtCreate":1653059927502,"gmtModify":1676535216682,"author":{"id":"3572310408162611","authorId":"3572310408162611","name":"Vanillin","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/42bb976aee4ad7669c027cd08d6aee51","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3572310408162611","idStr":"3572310408162611"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"I think there's room to correct","listText":"I think there's room to correct","text":"I think there's room to correct","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9021284103","repostId":"1171691690","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1171691690","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1653058984,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1171691690?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-05-20 23:03","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Tesla Slid Nearly 6% in Morning Trading and Reached an Eight-Month Low at $665.64","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1171691690","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Tesla slid nearly 6% in morning trading and reached an eight-month low at $665.64.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Tesla slid nearly 6% in morning trading and reached an eight-month low at $665.64.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8ba4ef15240181df846507f881087aee\" tg-width=\"769\" tg-height=\"566\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Tesla Slid Nearly 6% in Morning Trading and Reached an Eight-Month Low at $665.64</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTesla Slid Nearly 6% in Morning Trading and Reached an Eight-Month Low at $665.64\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-05-20 23:03</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>Tesla slid nearly 6% in morning trading and reached an eight-month low at $665.64.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8ba4ef15240181df846507f881087aee\" tg-width=\"769\" tg-height=\"566\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1171691690","content_text":"Tesla slid nearly 6% in morning trading and reached an eight-month low at $665.64.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"TSLA":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2873,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9008766283,"gmtCreate":1641527268702,"gmtModify":1676533625891,"author":{"id":"3572310408162611","authorId":"3572310408162611","name":"Vanillin","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/42bb976aee4ad7669c027cd08d6aee51","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3572310408162611","idStr":"3572310408162611"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Buying into SPACS is like throwing darts.. hopefully&nbsp;strike some good ones but some land on your toes. (GRAB),&nbsp;and that hurt 😞&nbsp;","listText":"Buying into SPACS is like throwing darts.. hopefully&nbsp;strike some good ones but some land on your toes. (GRAB),&nbsp;and that hurt 😞&nbsp;","text":"Buying into SPACS is like throwing darts.. hopefully strike some good ones but some land on your toes. (GRAB), and that hurt 😞","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9008766283","repostId":"2201629196","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2201629196","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1641526905,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2201629196?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-01-07 11:41","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Singapore SPAC Vertex Technology set for local listing on Jan 21 - source","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2201629196","media":"Reuters","summary":"SINGAPORE (Reuters) - A Singapore special-purpose acquisition company (SPAC) backed by state investo","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>SINGAPORE (Reuters) - A Singapore special-purpose acquisition company (SPAC) backed by state investor Temasek&#39;s Vertex Venture Holdings has started the book building for its initial public offering (IPO) and is set to list in the city-state on Jan. 21, a source with knowledge of the matter said on Friday.</p><p>Vertex Technology Acquisition Corp (VTAC), a SPAC focussing on cybersecurity, fintech and other sectors, said on Thursday it aimed to raise at least about S$170 million ($125 million) by selling units at S$5 apiece.</p><p>The source declined to be identified as he was not authorised to speak to the media.</p><p>There was no immediate response to a query sent to Vertex Venture Holdings.</p><p>($1 = 1.3599 Singapore dollars)</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Singapore SPAC Vertex Technology set for local listing on Jan 21 - source</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSingapore SPAC Vertex Technology set for local listing on Jan 21 - source\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-01-07 11:41</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>SINGAPORE (Reuters) - A Singapore special-purpose acquisition company (SPAC) backed by state investor Temasek&#39;s Vertex Venture Holdings has started the book building for its initial public offering (IPO) and is set to list in the city-state on Jan. 21, a source with knowledge of the matter said on Friday.</p><p>Vertex Technology Acquisition Corp (VTAC), a SPAC focussing on cybersecurity, fintech and other sectors, said on Thursday it aimed to raise at least about S$170 million ($125 million) by selling units at S$5 apiece.</p><p>The source declined to be identified as he was not authorised to speak to the media.</p><p>There was no immediate response to a query sent to Vertex Venture Holdings.</p><p>($1 = 1.3599 Singapore dollars)</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"VERX":"Vertex, Inc.","BK4023":"应用软件"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2201629196","content_text":"SINGAPORE (Reuters) - A Singapore special-purpose acquisition company (SPAC) backed by state investor Temasek's Vertex Venture Holdings has started the book building for its initial public offering (IPO) and is set to list in the city-state on Jan. 21, a source with knowledge of the matter said on Friday.Vertex Technology Acquisition Corp (VTAC), a SPAC focussing on cybersecurity, fintech and other sectors, said on Thursday it aimed to raise at least about S$170 million ($125 million) by selling units at S$5 apiece.The source declined to be identified as he was not authorised to speak to the media.There was no immediate response to a query sent to Vertex Venture Holdings.($1 = 1.3599 Singapore dollars)","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"VERX":1}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3610,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[{"author":{"id":"3573540190522229","authorId":"3573540190522229","name":"Targarean","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/59de1c73df3e7e460bd84cc786850fa6","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"authorIdStr":"3573540190522229","idStr":"3573540190522229"},"content":"Like throwing darts in the dark 😂 and $5 a piece seems rather steep. Gotta check out the financi als","text":"Like throwing darts in the dark 😂 and $5 a piece seems rather steep. Gotta check out the financi als","html":"Like throwing darts in the dark 😂 and $5 a piece seems rather steep. Gotta check out the financi als"}],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":818071623,"gmtCreate":1630368387162,"gmtModify":1676530281124,"author":{"id":"3572310408162611","authorId":"3572310408162611","name":"Vanillin","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/42bb976aee4ad7669c027cd08d6aee51","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3572310408162611","idStr":"3572310408162611"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Apple services should play important role in&nbsp;AAPL future. I still haven’t able to see how it can effectively take on the likes of Spotify and Netflix. This is a case of a&nbsp;elephant in the&nbsp;room.","listText":"Apple services should play important role in&nbsp;AAPL future. I still haven’t able to see how it can effectively take on the likes of Spotify and Netflix. This is a case of a&nbsp;elephant in the&nbsp;room.","text":"Apple services should play important role in AAPL future. I still haven’t able to see how it can effectively take on the likes of Spotify and Netflix. This is a case of a elephant in the room.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/818071623","repostId":"1110468761","repostType":2,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1384,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9090059101,"gmtCreate":1643039132207,"gmtModify":1676533767845,"author":{"id":"3572310408162611","authorId":"3572310408162611","name":"Vanillin","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/42bb976aee4ad7669c027cd08d6aee51","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3572310408162611","idStr":"3572310408162611"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Netflix is still considered a big tech by any means. It's at least making money joining the ranks of the&nbsp;likes AAPL, GOOG, MSFT &amp; META","listText":"Netflix is still considered a big tech by any means. It's at least making money joining the ranks of the&nbsp;likes AAPL, GOOG, MSFT &amp; META","text":"Netflix is still considered a big tech by any means. It's at least making money joining the ranks of the likes AAPL, GOOG, MSFT & META","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9090059101","repostId":"2205009998","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2205009998","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1643035806,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2205009998?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-01-24 22:50","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Thinking of Selling Netflix? 2 Things to Remember","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2205009998","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"The first-quarter guidance was ugly, but there's more to the story than that.","content":"<div>\n<p>Investors are pressing pause on Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX). The streaming stock  got torched Thursday afternoon after it reported disappointing guidance in its fourth-quarter earnings report. Shares ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/01/24/thinking-of-selling-netflix-2-things-to-remember/\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Thinking of Selling Netflix? 2 Things to Remember</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nThinking of Selling Netflix? 2 Things to Remember\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-01-24 22:50 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/01/24/thinking-of-selling-netflix-2-things-to-remember/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Investors are pressing pause on Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX). The streaming stock  got torched Thursday afternoon after it reported disappointing guidance in its fourth-quarter earnings report. Shares ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/01/24/thinking-of-selling-netflix-2-things-to-remember/\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NFLX":"奈飞","BK4527":"明星科技股","BK4551":"寇图资本持仓","BK4566":"资本集团","BK4108":"电影和娱乐","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","BK4548":"巴美列捷福持仓","BK4507":"流媒体概念","BK4524":"宅经济概念","BK4532":"文艺复兴科技持仓"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/01/24/thinking-of-selling-netflix-2-things-to-remember/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2205009998","content_text":"Investors are pressing pause on Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX). The streaming stock  got torched Thursday afternoon after it reported disappointing guidance in its fourth-quarter earnings report. Shares plunged 20% in after-hours trading.The sell-off itself wasn't surprising. Netflix called for just 2.5 million subscriber additions in the current quarter, an unusually weak forecast for a seasonally strong quarter. Worse, it sees revenue growing just 10% to $7.9 billion, which would be its slowest growth in a decade.If you're thinking of selling Netflix stock on the news, you're not alone. Wall Street analysts trashed the streamer following the report, with one calling it \"dead money\" and another saying \"the good old days may be gone.\" Indeed, the days of Netflix posting breathless growth quarter after quarter are likely over, barring an unforeseen change to the business. But if you're ready to part with Netflix shares following the stock plunge and the disappointing guidance, you should be aware of two things.1. Shares have never been cheaper in the streaming eraNetflix may no longer be behaving like a growth stock, but the good news is it's no longer priced like one either. Following the post-earnings dip, Netflix shares now trade at a price-to-earnings ratio of just 36. That's only modestly higher than the S&P 500's P/E ratio of 26, and cheaper than it's ever been since 2012 when the company made streaming its primary business, leaving the DVD-by-mail operation behind.While Netflix's growth has slowed in recent years, it's turned into a profit machine. The company just finished a year with a 21% operating margin, making earlier cries about cash burn look silly. In 2022, management actually expects a modest decline in operating margin, at 19%-20%, but that's primarily due to a stronger U.S. dollar, which is expected to shave 2 percentage points off that metric.The company is still sticking to its long-term promise of delivering an average increase in operating margin of 3 percentage points a year, meaning by 2024 it expects to keep 28% of its revenue as operating profit. Even as revenue growth is slowing, profit margin will accelerate to make up for it. 2022 is just a noisy year because of foreign exchange and outsize growth in profit margins over the last two years.2. Revenue growth will improve after Q1Netflix didn't provide guidance beyond the first quarter, and there's no question the Q1 numbers are disappointing. With 2.5 million subscriber additions, this would be its weakest Q1 performance in at least five years, and a slowdown in revenue growth from 16% in Q4 2021 to 10% in the current quarter seems severe.However, management seemed to imply that revenue growth would improve after the first quarter. It noted that its first-quarter content releases were weighted toward the end of the quarter with two big releases (Bridgerton and The Adam Project) slated for March, meaning the impact of those will also be felt in Q2. Additionally, the company is raising prices on all North American subscriptions with the standard U.S. package going from $13.99/month to $15.49/month.  The financial numbers should begin to benefit from that price hike in the second quarter as about 40% of its revenue still comes from North America. Netflix's last price hike in the U.S. was in October 2020 so Q1 represents a lull where the revenue numbers don't get a tailwind from higher U.S. prices. From Q2 on, revenue growth should improve to at least the mid-teens.The new Netflix realityKeeping those factors in mind, it's also worth remembering that Netflix's heady growth days are probably over. It's hard to see the stock doubling in a year as it did multiple times during the 2010s, now that its business is much more mature and revenue is only growing in the teens.Still, considering the stock's valuation, a probable rebound in performance after the first quarter, and a number of valuable competitive advantages including its leadership in a huge growth market, the stock looks like a good bet to outperform the S&P 500 over the next three to five years.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"NFLX":1}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3532,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9004396684,"gmtCreate":1642499275985,"gmtModify":1676533715826,"author":{"id":"3572310408162611","authorId":"3572310408162611","name":"Vanillin","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/42bb976aee4ad7669c027cd08d6aee51","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3572310408162611","idStr":"3572310408162611"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"sigh…[Put]&nbsp;","listText":"sigh…[Put]&nbsp;","text":"sigh…[Put]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9004396684","repostId":"1125098838","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1125098838","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1642498524,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1125098838?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-01-18 17:35","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Hot Chinese ADRs Slid in Premarket Trading","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1125098838","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Hot Chinese ADRs slid in Premarket Trading. Alibaba, JD.com, Pinduoduo, Baidu, NetEase, IQiyi and RL","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Hot Chinese ADRs slid in Premarket Trading. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BABA\">Alibaba</a>, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/JD\">JD.com</a>, Pinduoduo, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BIDU\">Baidu</a>, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NTES\">NetEase</a>, IQiyi and RLX Technology fell between 1% and 5%.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5ebed618d1c4b089af648a54f3680a81\" tg-width=\"366\" tg-height=\"647\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Hot Chinese ADRs Slid in Premarket Trading</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHot Chinese ADRs Slid in Premarket Trading\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-01-18 17:35</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>Hot Chinese ADRs slid in Premarket Trading. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BABA\">Alibaba</a>, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/JD\">JD.com</a>, Pinduoduo, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BIDU\">Baidu</a>, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NTES\">NetEase</a>, IQiyi and RLX Technology fell between 1% and 5%.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5ebed618d1c4b089af648a54f3680a81\" tg-width=\"366\" tg-height=\"647\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BK4505":"高瓴资本持仓","BABA":"阿里巴巴","BK4504":"桥水持仓","BIDU":"百度","BK4548":"巴美列捷福持仓","NTES":"网易","09988":"阿里巴巴-W","JD":"京东","BK4509":"腾讯概念","QNETCN":"纳斯达克中美互联网老虎指数","BK4532":"文艺复兴科技持仓","BK4527":"明星科技股","DIDI":"滴滴(已退市)","BK4077":"互动媒体与服务","09618":"京东集团-SW","BK4531":"中概回港概念","BK4526":"热门中概股","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","BK4514":"搜索引擎","BK4122":"互联网与直销零售","BK4558":"双十一"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1125098838","content_text":"Hot Chinese ADRs slid in Premarket Trading. Alibaba, JD.com, Pinduoduo, Baidu, NetEase, IQiyi and RLX Technology fell between 1% and 5%.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"BABA":0.9,"QNETCN":0.9,"09988":0.9,"BIDU":0.9,"JD":0.9,"NTES":0.9,"DIDI":0.9,"09618":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2792,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9002420532,"gmtCreate":1642075405797,"gmtModify":1676533678185,"author":{"id":"3572310408162611","authorId":"3572310408162611","name":"Vanillin","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/42bb976aee4ad7669c027cd08d6aee51","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3572310408162611","idStr":"3572310408162611"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Diamond hand.. I like Zoom, &nbsp;it they need to be more aggressive in their investment strategy. PLTR too secretive a company, and CEO cares little on&nbsp;building&nbsp;shareholders’ interest.&nbsp;&nbsp;","listText":"Diamond hand.. I like Zoom, &nbsp;it they need to be more aggressive in their investment strategy. PLTR too secretive a company, and CEO cares little on&nbsp;building&nbsp;shareholders’ interest.&nbsp;&nbsp;","text":"Diamond hand.. I like Zoom, it they need to be more aggressive in their investment strategy. PLTR too secretive a company, and CEO cares little on building shareholders’ interest.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9002420532","repostId":"1186224135","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1186224135","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Stock Market Quotes, Business News, Financial News, Trading Ideas, and Stock Research by Professionals","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Benzinga","id":"1052270027","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa"},"pubTimestamp":1642073038,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1186224135?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-01-13 19:23","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Cathie Wood Sells Another $3M Shares In Tesla On Wednesday — Here's What She Bought Instead","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1186224135","media":"Benzinga","summary":"Cathie Wood’sArk Investment Managementon Wednesday booked more profit inTeslaInc, selling 2,656 shares — estimated to be worth $2.9 million based on the latest closing price — in the electric vehicle ","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>Cathie Wood</b>’s <b>Ark Investment Management</b> on Wednesday booked more profit in <b>Tesla</b> <b>Inc</b>, selling 2,656 shares — estimated to be worth $2.9 million based on the latest closing price — in the electric vehicle maker.</p><p>The <b>Elon Musk</b>-led company’s stock closed 3.9% higher at $1,106.2 per share on Wednesday.</p><p>Ark Invest owns shares in Tesla via three of its exchange-traded funds — the <b>Ark Innovation ETF</b>, the <b>Ark Autonomous Technology &amp; Robotics ETF</b> and the <b>Ark Next Generation Internet ETF</b>.</p><p>The three ETFs held about 1.61 million shares worth $1.72 billion in Tesla, prior to Wednesday’s trade.</p><p>Tesla ended 2021 on a high as it posted its biggest quarterly and full-year delivery volume. The Austin, Texas-based electric vehicle maker’s Giga Shanghai accounted for more than half of the electric vehicle maker’s global deliveries in 2021.</p><p>Wood, who founded Ark Invest, is a Tesla bull and has set a $3,000 price target for the electric vehicle stock for 2025. The investment firm has been selling shares in Tesla since September after shares moved higher to breach the$1 trillion market cap.</p><p>The St. Petersburg, Florida-based Ark has also been recently loading up shares in the U.S.-listed Chinese electric vehicle maker <b>Xpeng Inc</b>.</p><p>Here are a few other key Ark Invest trades from Wednesday:</p><ul><li>Bought 70,259 shares — estimated to be about $12 million — in <b>Zoom Video Communications Inc</b> on the dip. The Zoom stock closed 3% lower at $170.6 a share on Wednesday.</li><li>Bought 628,636 shares — estimated to be worth $10.5 million — in <b>Palantir Technologies Inc</b>. Shares of the company closed 1% lower at $16.7 a share.</li></ul></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Cathie Wood Sells Another $3M Shares In Tesla On Wednesday — Here's What She Bought Instead</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nCathie Wood Sells Another $3M Shares In Tesla On Wednesday — Here's What She Bought Instead\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Benzinga </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-01-13 19:23</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p><b>Cathie Wood</b>’s <b>Ark Investment Management</b> on Wednesday booked more profit in <b>Tesla</b> <b>Inc</b>, selling 2,656 shares — estimated to be worth $2.9 million based on the latest closing price — in the electric vehicle maker.</p><p>The <b>Elon Musk</b>-led company’s stock closed 3.9% higher at $1,106.2 per share on Wednesday.</p><p>Ark Invest owns shares in Tesla via three of its exchange-traded funds — the <b>Ark Innovation ETF</b>, the <b>Ark Autonomous Technology &amp; Robotics ETF</b> and the <b>Ark Next Generation Internet ETF</b>.</p><p>The three ETFs held about 1.61 million shares worth $1.72 billion in Tesla, prior to Wednesday’s trade.</p><p>Tesla ended 2021 on a high as it posted its biggest quarterly and full-year delivery volume. The Austin, Texas-based electric vehicle maker’s Giga Shanghai accounted for more than half of the electric vehicle maker’s global deliveries in 2021.</p><p>Wood, who founded Ark Invest, is a Tesla bull and has set a $3,000 price target for the electric vehicle stock for 2025. The investment firm has been selling shares in Tesla since September after shares moved higher to breach the$1 trillion market cap.</p><p>The St. Petersburg, Florida-based Ark has also been recently loading up shares in the U.S.-listed Chinese electric vehicle maker <b>Xpeng Inc</b>.</p><p>Here are a few other key Ark Invest trades from Wednesday:</p><ul><li>Bought 70,259 shares — estimated to be about $12 million — in <b>Zoom Video Communications Inc</b> on the dip. The Zoom stock closed 3% lower at $170.6 a share on Wednesday.</li><li>Bought 628,636 shares — estimated to be worth $10.5 million — in <b>Palantir Technologies Inc</b>. Shares of the company closed 1% lower at $16.7 a share.</li></ul></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"ZM":"Zoom","TSLA":"特斯拉","PLTR":"Palantir Technologies Inc."},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1186224135","content_text":"Cathie Wood’s Ark Investment Management on Wednesday booked more profit in Tesla Inc, selling 2,656 shares — estimated to be worth $2.9 million based on the latest closing price — in the electric vehicle maker.The Elon Musk-led company’s stock closed 3.9% higher at $1,106.2 per share on Wednesday.Ark Invest owns shares in Tesla via three of its exchange-traded funds — the Ark Innovation ETF, the Ark Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF and the Ark Next Generation Internet ETF.The three ETFs held about 1.61 million shares worth $1.72 billion in Tesla, prior to Wednesday’s trade.Tesla ended 2021 on a high as it posted its biggest quarterly and full-year delivery volume. The Austin, Texas-based electric vehicle maker’s Giga Shanghai accounted for more than half of the electric vehicle maker’s global deliveries in 2021.Wood, who founded Ark Invest, is a Tesla bull and has set a $3,000 price target for the electric vehicle stock for 2025. The investment firm has been selling shares in Tesla since September after shares moved higher to breach the$1 trillion market cap.The St. Petersburg, Florida-based Ark has also been recently loading up shares in the U.S.-listed Chinese electric vehicle maker Xpeng Inc.Here are a few other key Ark Invest trades from Wednesday:Bought 70,259 shares — estimated to be about $12 million — in Zoom Video Communications Inc on the dip. The Zoom stock closed 3% lower at $170.6 a share on Wednesday.Bought 628,636 shares — estimated to be worth $10.5 million — in Palantir Technologies Inc. Shares of the company closed 1% lower at $16.7 a share.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"PLTR":0.9,"TSLA":0.9,"ZM":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2040,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9915351216,"gmtCreate":1664967584335,"gmtModify":1676537536872,"author":{"id":"3572310408162611","authorId":"3572310408162611","name":"Vanillin","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/42bb976aee4ad7669c027cd08d6aee51","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3572310408162611","idStr":"3572310408162611"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"com i think 💭&nbsp;","listText":"com i think 💭&nbsp;","text":"com i think 💭","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9915351216","repostId":"1177866087","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1177866087","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1664967482,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1177866087?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-10-05 18:58","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Google to Build South African Cloud in $1 Billion Africa Plan","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1177866087","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"Data storage options to help users meet sovereignty rulesSouth Africa cloud region could create 40,0","content":"<div>\n<p>Data storage options to help users meet sovereignty rulesSouth Africa cloud region could create 40,000 jobs by 2030Google said it will set up an African cloud service, as part of its $1 billion ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-10-05/google-to-build-south-african-cloud-in-1-billion-africa-plan?srnd=technology-vp\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"lsy1584095487587","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Google to Build South African Cloud in $1 Billion Africa Plan</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nGoogle to Build South African Cloud in $1 Billion Africa Plan\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-10-05 18:58 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-10-05/google-to-build-south-african-cloud-in-1-billion-africa-plan?srnd=technology-vp><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Data storage options to help users meet sovereignty rulesSouth Africa cloud region could create 40,000 jobs by 2030Google said it will set up an African cloud service, as part of its $1 billion ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-10-05/google-to-build-south-african-cloud-in-1-billion-africa-plan?srnd=technology-vp\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"GOOG":"谷歌","GOOGL":"谷歌A"},"source_url":"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-10-05/google-to-build-south-african-cloud-in-1-billion-africa-plan?srnd=technology-vp","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1177866087","content_text":"Data storage options to help users meet sovereignty rulesSouth Africa cloud region could create 40,000 jobs by 2030Google said it will set up an African cloud service, as part of its $1 billion investment plan for the continent, that will allow users to store their data in-country.The cloud infrastructure will be based in South Africa, but will give users the options on where to store their data, said Niral Patel, the director of Google Cloud Africa.“We are giving customers and partners choice, they then have the choice where they would like to store data and where they would like to consumer cloud services from,” Patel said on a video call on Wednesday.African countries have a patchwork of laws on data sovereignty, with some requiring companies to store data within their borders, increasing demand for a more flexible regional cloud service. In Nigeria, phone companies are prohibited from sending government or customer information outside of the country, part of a push to encourage the development of local companies to store and manage the data.The  Alphabet Inc. unit will compete with Microsoft Corp. and Amazon Web Services in Africa’s most developed economy. Google estimates that the South Africa cloud region could contribute more than $2.1 billion to the country’s economy, and support the creation of more than 40,000 jobs by 2030, Patel said.Google also said it’s building out its African subsea cable and cloud interconnect sites in four cities including Cape Town, Johannesburg, Lagos and Nairobi to provide full cloud capability for the continent.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"GOOGL":0.9,"GOOG":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2949,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9029282074,"gmtCreate":1652787187098,"gmtModify":1676535161011,"author":{"id":"3572310408162611","authorId":"3572310408162611","name":"Vanillin","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/42bb976aee4ad7669c027cd08d6aee51","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3572310408162611","idStr":"3572310408162611"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"I think Netflix is still a clear leader in video streaming but it has become a blood bath with ever demand for new content. It will be interesting to see Hastings move into gaming. For now, Im still a skeptic.&nbsp;","listText":"I think Netflix is still a clear leader in video streaming but it has become a blood bath with ever demand for new content. It will be interesting to see Hastings move into gaming. For now, Im still a skeptic.&nbsp;","text":"I think Netflix is still a clear leader in video streaming but it has become a blood bath with ever demand for new content. It will be interesting to see Hastings move into gaming. For now, Im still a skeptic.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9029282074","repostId":"2236212001","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2236212001","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1652785520,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2236212001?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-05-17 19:05","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Netflix: A Series Of Red Flags","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2236212001","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"Overview(Source: Google)After Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX) reported its Q1’22 results, the share price tumb","content":"<html><head></head><body><h2>Overview</h2><p></p><p><img src=\"https://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2022/5/10/saupload_fsCLTHKVDI04imUamEwp5f2aYtPoJKtSfK8jQ3EYdONi9f8fMjYfsgVh6P9zF1NaGTDljs9if5JhrVI7kOAjvF_V7LIVZnfYxY6KnI07cu_fEsAWJJ7mCLaz0d3fAvBwo-luaxzlGOMOkKKzsA_thumb1.png\" tg-width=\"1280\" tg-height=\"979\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>(Source: Google)</p><p>After Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX) reported its Q1’22 results, the share price tumbled 37%. You might ask, what exactly had happened to warrant such pessimism and drastic drawdown?</p><p>Well, you’ve come to the right place. Here&#39;s what we are going to be covering today in this article.</p><h2>Headwinds: Economies Reopening and Competition Intensifying</h2><p>2020 and 2021 were massive years for Netflix as there was an acceleration in the adoption of digital streaming services. However, as the pandemic severity starts to wind down, and people start to spend more time outside, the elevated demand will be reduced to more normalized levels.</p><p>Competition in the industry is also heating up with the influx of streaming services such as Disney+, Hulu, Apple TV+, HBO Max, and Amazon Prime.</p><p>This means that users today are spoilt for choice. Companies that fall short of consumers’ expectations, such as the lack of quality content, will find it more challenging to retain these users. The ever-increasing inflation rate has also significantly reduced consumers’ purchasing power, and they are likely to stick with a few core services that are able to attend to their needs. Reports by The Guardian and iMore showed that Apple TV+ and Disney+ have seen huge churn while categorizing Amazon Prime and Netflix as “must-haves”.</p><p>However, this is not the time to be complacent just yet.</p><p>Companies like Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) and Amazon (NASDAQ:AMZN) have a highly competitive edge over Netflix as they possess highly profitable core businesses financing their investments in curating more content. This puts pressure on Netflix&#39;s ability to invest and compete for the long-term while also focus on profitability at the same time.</p><h2>Growth Deceleration</h2><p></p><p><img src=\"https://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2022/5/10/saupload_le5yZpvn0WLNHgDWstkN9_OnNUxsmhzxJcie2yKls1oVq1ooeh9PJfoes5P-R139BCx3dBk4ictumjsNmUMkn8EDzqOGQvyOniHfMl-mH2RVAh1r95d4-Xie60fPEICE75LOWjl-v4UV0yLg3g_thumb1.png\" tg-width=\"1280\" tg-height=\"604\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>(Source: Netflix Investor Relations)</p><p></p><p>As soon as Netflix reported its Q1’22 quarterly results, all eyes were on its revenue growth and subscriber count. Subscribers are important as costs can be spread over a larger base, and that contributes to the bottom line.</p><p>However, the results were shocking, to say the least.</p><p>Instead of reporting 2.5 million new subscribers as guided in Q4’21, the company reported a loss of 200,000 subscribers, making it the first decline in a decade. As a result, the revenue grew at a disappointing single-digit rate of 9.8%, down from the double-digit growth they experienced in FY21. Investors ought to be horrified.</p><p>This is attributed to a few reasons:</p><ul><li><p>COVID tailwinds wearing off</p></li><li><p>Intensifying competition</p></li><li><p>The suspension of service in Russia resulted in the loss of subscribers</p></li><li><p>Factors like the adoption of Connected TVs &amp; on-demand entertainment, which is outside of its control</p></li><li><p>The inability to monetize the 100 million non-subscribers using Netflix’s password sharing</p></li></ul><p>To re-accelerate its double-digit revenue growth, here’s what the management has laid out to address investors’ concerns:</p><ol><li><p>To reinvest by coming up with more big-hit content that users want to see</p></li><li><p>To monetize on 100 million households using password sharing</p></li><li><p>Offer a low-priced plan with advertising</p></li></ol><p>However, we think that the strategies are questionable. Let us share our thoughts.</p><h3>Concern #1: Early Monetization</h3><p>The management claimed that there is a huge Total Addressable Market (“TAM”):</p><blockquote>...while hundreds of millions of homes pay for Netflix, well over half of the world’s broadband homes don’t yet, representing huge future growth potential.</blockquote><p>This sounds like they are confident that Netflix has a long runway to grow, and that the majority are to come from international markets. However, instead of reinvesting in the business, why are they focusing on monetizing?</p><p>This news came after Netflix announced that it was going to raise the subscription fees in various countries like the US, Canada, the UK, and even Singapore, where we reside. This highlights its inability to find additional income sources, so it had to resort to raising its prices. These increases were not well-received as customers were unhappy with the multiple price hikes and the crackdown on password sharing. During the Q1’22 results, the subscriber count in the UCAN and EMEA regions (the US and Canada) fell by 640,000 and 300,000, respectively.</p><p>Coincidence? We think not.</p><p>In our view, increasing prices should be a late-game monetization. This is especially so when Netflix is the market leader with a huge TAM. Eventually, it comes to a point where it is impossible to squeeze its customers without it being at the expense of their happiness.</p><h3>Concern #2: Diversifying Its Revenue Through Ad-Tier Plan</h3><p>Digital streaming services have been adopting a hybrid model of Advertising-based Video On Demand (“AVOD”) and Subscription Video On Demand (“SVOD”) as seen on platforms like Hulu, HBO Max, and most recently, Disney+.</p><p>But, what’s the appeal of a hybrid model?</p><p>It is about offering users more control and choices. Users that do not mind seeing ads or are price-sensitive tend to opt for an ad-tier plan, whereas users who prefer a seamless experience are willing to pay more for an ad-free plan. At the same time, the company can generate additional revenue from advertisers by leveraging their massive audiences.</p><p>This creates a win-win-win situation.</p><p>Operating under a pure SVOD model has limitations – there is a cap on how much it can continue to raise its prices before users get frustrated and leave. Prices are increased to cover the rising cost of creating content, and this makes it harder to juggle the balance of reinvesting in content while also offering it at affordable pricing.</p><p>Now, with Netflix jumping on the bandwagon, what does it really mean to its business?</p><p>Netflix is very likely to see existing subscribers churn and switch over from a higher-priced plan, cannibalizing their own subscribers. This in turn may affect revenue in the short term. Could this also be the way to win back price-sensitive customers? More churns will lead to lesser revenue, and less money to compete on content, putting pressure on Netflix to compete with players like Apple and Amazon with strong internal financing, and Disney with valuable franchises.</p><p>Strangely, this decision was made rather abruptly as back in March 2022 (a month ago), CFO Spencer Neumann resisted coming up with an ad-supported tier model as they didn’t feel it was necessary:</p><blockquote>But that&#39;s not something that&#39;s in our plans right now. We think we have a great model in the subscription business. It scales globally, really well…and again, never say never, but it&#39;s not in our plan, but other folks are learning from it. So it&#39;s hard for us to kind of ignore that others are doing it, but it now doesn&#39;t make sense for us.</blockquote><p>Did the management&#39;s inability to foresee the slowdown in growth, lack of revenue streams, pressure from shareholders, and increasing competition cause Netflix to succumb to the decision of moving into an ad-supported model, hoping to curb the slowdown in growth to restore investors’ confidence?</p><h3><b>Concern #3: Invest In Content While Focusing On Profitability</b></h3><p></p><p><img src=\"https://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2022/5/17/saupload_MtFB4ACalwrMRAxUfKx0xuhE3F6t8qcKazLHcWEuOmBVi4xAk2LIsltcxPI4M7ahr0qfnsrhoZDYzmzn8NGd0Q46KzdsgrbA-rjFHqzroQUCXYSwST36mumwXA8rj2WOVkqVTeM5fdIBTlzHAg.png\" tg-width=\"1200\" tg-height=\"742\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>(Source: NFLX IR)</p><p></p><p>During the earnings call, the management talked about reinvesting in its content while also pulling back on its spending to reflect the realities of its revenue growth. Here, you can see that its marketing expenses have declined by ~30% sequentially.</p><p></p><p><img src=\"https://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2022/5/17/saupload_Q5tXqhhNhk8trNMvANeslGfDIovIcIaaGnSmsPXQ0MBf6vXs11GEx356jVL0UO9ueWylc1_j8Uzp5g22xuweqy5vFjMGd5-iWNJGrxvuACSRdj_pxKg2yvQgAaDZSeryE-MIU9eFM1nmmrVPKQ.png\" tg-width=\"1200\" tg-height=\"742\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>(Source: NFLX IR)</p><p><img src=\"https://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2022/5/17/saupload_8eq-XiiBvsA0s285xbwBduy-ICk41UnQ8rFLOf80xsFbA9oj2lLTX_8FfAiN6puh_gA7kAsYiKLoy9oBT3kYdNU28CmH2WgTQsAS76oAcHKiVEep6o8gzbADxAPL-Z5Ebt43-xf3D-ozGSMtOw.png\" tg-width=\"1200\" tg-height=\"742\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>(Source: NFLX IR)</p><p></p><p>As a result, its Gross Margin and Operating Margin have increased to 45.5% and 25.1%, respectively, during the quarter. Over the next 2 years, they are expected to maintain an Operating Margin of 20%.</p><p>This means moving forward, they are going to rely on funding from ads and also increase the revenue per account since it cannot rely on acquiring new subscribers.</p><p>Netflix still has lots to prove to justify its price increase. Without more value added, these increases may drive customers away.</p><h2>Inefficient Marketing Spend</h2><p>This brings us to the next part - its inefficient marketing spend.</p><p>In Q1’22, the management spent a total of $556 million on marketing dollars, yet 200,000 subscribers churned during the quarter and a further 2 million expected in the next quarter. This is $555 million down the drain; and worse, they are losing money for every subscriber they acquired!</p><p></p><p><img src=\"https://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2022/5/17/saupload_taGay5zH_MjdUYB4oRWl90wveWuHp6UvDbQHmrbl57A7DULJw2Ux36a5F0it-JWOFUh3Fwq_S2bKhCoxGDcGRalxAefP100A-6qULcj8XcpC6UfzJF3JgcspGRgmLuihttR3zY4op4fwSSfolA.png\" tg-width=\"1200\" tg-height=\"742\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>(Source: NFLX IR)</p><p></p><p>Furthermore, in the last 2 quarters, its Operating Leverage has started to go downhill as its Operating Profit is growing slower than its revenue growth. This indicates a lack of marketing efficiency as its marketing spend is not translating into revenue growth. In our view, this screams a dire call for change for the marketing team to review its marketing strategies.</p><p>At this time, there is no clear visibility ahead as to whether those strategies being laid out can be implemented successfully to resume its Operating Leverage growth.</p><h2>Closing Thoughts</h2><p>Netflix has done really well over the last decade to bring a huge amount of content that viewers want and need at an affordable price.</p><p>However, the story has drastically changed as existing subscribers are increasingly unhappy with Netflix’s decisions to monetize the platform, and we think their strategies are questionable.</p><p>These red flags do not sound like a growth story to us - at least, for the present.</p><p>The more important question that many are wondering is, has the management lost track of what it really means to put the customers’ interests first? Can they win back the hearts and trust of their customers? These short-term headwinds are currently a test of their ability to execute, and whether they can navigate them remains to be seen.</p><p>What are your thoughts on the quarter? Let us know in the comment section below.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Netflix: A Series Of Red Flags</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nNetflix: A Series Of Red Flags\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-05-17 19:05 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4512405-netflix-a-series-of-red-flags><strong>Seeking Alpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Overview(Source: Google)After Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX) reported its Q1’22 results, the share price tumbled 37%. You might ask, what exactly had happened to warrant such pessimism and drastic drawdown?...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4512405-netflix-a-series-of-red-flags\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NFLX":"奈飞"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4512405-netflix-a-series-of-red-flags","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2236212001","content_text":"Overview(Source: Google)After Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX) reported its Q1’22 results, the share price tumbled 37%. You might ask, what exactly had happened to warrant such pessimism and drastic drawdown?Well, you’ve come to the right place. Here's what we are going to be covering today in this article.Headwinds: Economies Reopening and Competition Intensifying2020 and 2021 were massive years for Netflix as there was an acceleration in the adoption of digital streaming services. However, as the pandemic severity starts to wind down, and people start to spend more time outside, the elevated demand will be reduced to more normalized levels.Competition in the industry is also heating up with the influx of streaming services such as Disney+, Hulu, Apple TV+, HBO Max, and Amazon Prime.This means that users today are spoilt for choice. Companies that fall short of consumers’ expectations, such as the lack of quality content, will find it more challenging to retain these users. The ever-increasing inflation rate has also significantly reduced consumers’ purchasing power, and they are likely to stick with a few core services that are able to attend to their needs. Reports by The Guardian and iMore showed that Apple TV+ and Disney+ have seen huge churn while categorizing Amazon Prime and Netflix as “must-haves”.However, this is not the time to be complacent just yet.Companies like Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) and Amazon (NASDAQ:AMZN) have a highly competitive edge over Netflix as they possess highly profitable core businesses financing their investments in curating more content. This puts pressure on Netflix's ability to invest and compete for the long-term while also focus on profitability at the same time.Growth Deceleration(Source: Netflix Investor Relations)As soon as Netflix reported its Q1’22 quarterly results, all eyes were on its revenue growth and subscriber count. Subscribers are important as costs can be spread over a larger base, and that contributes to the bottom line.However, the results were shocking, to say the least.Instead of reporting 2.5 million new subscribers as guided in Q4’21, the company reported a loss of 200,000 subscribers, making it the first decline in a decade. As a result, the revenue grew at a disappointing single-digit rate of 9.8%, down from the double-digit growth they experienced in FY21. Investors ought to be horrified.This is attributed to a few reasons:COVID tailwinds wearing offIntensifying competitionThe suspension of service in Russia resulted in the loss of subscribersFactors like the adoption of Connected TVs & on-demand entertainment, which is outside of its controlThe inability to monetize the 100 million non-subscribers using Netflix’s password sharingTo re-accelerate its double-digit revenue growth, here’s what the management has laid out to address investors’ concerns:To reinvest by coming up with more big-hit content that users want to seeTo monetize on 100 million households using password sharingOffer a low-priced plan with advertisingHowever, we think that the strategies are questionable. Let us share our thoughts.Concern #1: Early MonetizationThe management claimed that there is a huge Total Addressable Market (“TAM”):...while hundreds of millions of homes pay for Netflix, well over half of the world’s broadband homes don’t yet, representing huge future growth potential.This sounds like they are confident that Netflix has a long runway to grow, and that the majority are to come from international markets. However, instead of reinvesting in the business, why are they focusing on monetizing?This news came after Netflix announced that it was going to raise the subscription fees in various countries like the US, Canada, the UK, and even Singapore, where we reside. This highlights its inability to find additional income sources, so it had to resort to raising its prices. These increases were not well-received as customers were unhappy with the multiple price hikes and the crackdown on password sharing. During the Q1’22 results, the subscriber count in the UCAN and EMEA regions (the US and Canada) fell by 640,000 and 300,000, respectively.Coincidence? We think not.In our view, increasing prices should be a late-game monetization. This is especially so when Netflix is the market leader with a huge TAM. Eventually, it comes to a point where it is impossible to squeeze its customers without it being at the expense of their happiness.Concern #2: Diversifying Its Revenue Through Ad-Tier PlanDigital streaming services have been adopting a hybrid model of Advertising-based Video On Demand (“AVOD”) and Subscription Video On Demand (“SVOD”) as seen on platforms like Hulu, HBO Max, and most recently, Disney+.But, what’s the appeal of a hybrid model?It is about offering users more control and choices. Users that do not mind seeing ads or are price-sensitive tend to opt for an ad-tier plan, whereas users who prefer a seamless experience are willing to pay more for an ad-free plan. At the same time, the company can generate additional revenue from advertisers by leveraging their massive audiences.This creates a win-win-win situation.Operating under a pure SVOD model has limitations – there is a cap on how much it can continue to raise its prices before users get frustrated and leave. Prices are increased to cover the rising cost of creating content, and this makes it harder to juggle the balance of reinvesting in content while also offering it at affordable pricing.Now, with Netflix jumping on the bandwagon, what does it really mean to its business?Netflix is very likely to see existing subscribers churn and switch over from a higher-priced plan, cannibalizing their own subscribers. This in turn may affect revenue in the short term. Could this also be the way to win back price-sensitive customers? More churns will lead to lesser revenue, and less money to compete on content, putting pressure on Netflix to compete with players like Apple and Amazon with strong internal financing, and Disney with valuable franchises.Strangely, this decision was made rather abruptly as back in March 2022 (a month ago), CFO Spencer Neumann resisted coming up with an ad-supported tier model as they didn’t feel it was necessary:But that's not something that's in our plans right now. We think we have a great model in the subscription business. It scales globally, really well…and again, never say never, but it's not in our plan, but other folks are learning from it. So it's hard for us to kind of ignore that others are doing it, but it now doesn't make sense for us.Did the management's inability to foresee the slowdown in growth, lack of revenue streams, pressure from shareholders, and increasing competition cause Netflix to succumb to the decision of moving into an ad-supported model, hoping to curb the slowdown in growth to restore investors’ confidence?Concern #3: Invest In Content While Focusing On Profitability(Source: NFLX IR)During the earnings call, the management talked about reinvesting in its content while also pulling back on its spending to reflect the realities of its revenue growth. Here, you can see that its marketing expenses have declined by ~30% sequentially.(Source: NFLX IR)(Source: NFLX IR)As a result, its Gross Margin and Operating Margin have increased to 45.5% and 25.1%, respectively, during the quarter. Over the next 2 years, they are expected to maintain an Operating Margin of 20%.This means moving forward, they are going to rely on funding from ads and also increase the revenue per account since it cannot rely on acquiring new subscribers.Netflix still has lots to prove to justify its price increase. Without more value added, these increases may drive customers away.Inefficient Marketing SpendThis brings us to the next part - its inefficient marketing spend.In Q1’22, the management spent a total of $556 million on marketing dollars, yet 200,000 subscribers churned during the quarter and a further 2 million expected in the next quarter. This is $555 million down the drain; and worse, they are losing money for every subscriber they acquired!(Source: NFLX IR)Furthermore, in the last 2 quarters, its Operating Leverage has started to go downhill as its Operating Profit is growing slower than its revenue growth. This indicates a lack of marketing efficiency as its marketing spend is not translating into revenue growth. In our view, this screams a dire call for change for the marketing team to review its marketing strategies.At this time, there is no clear visibility ahead as to whether those strategies being laid out can be implemented successfully to resume its Operating Leverage growth.Closing ThoughtsNetflix has done really well over the last decade to bring a huge amount of content that viewers want and need at an affordable price.However, the story has drastically changed as existing subscribers are increasingly unhappy with Netflix’s decisions to monetize the platform, and we think their strategies are questionable.These red flags do not sound like a growth story to us - at least, for the present.The more important question that many are wondering is, has the management lost track of what it really means to put the customers’ interests first? Can they win back the hearts and trust of their customers? These short-term headwinds are currently a test of their ability to execute, and whether they can navigate them remains to be seen.What are your thoughts on the quarter? Let us know in the comment section below.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"NFLX":1}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2101,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}