RicPuah personal page - To The Moon

RicPuah

RicPuah

No personal profile

721Follow

43Followers

0Topic

0Badge

2022-08-09

Like pls

3 Stocks to Avoid This Week

2022-08-04

Like pls

Oil Falls Below $90 on Weaker US Gasoline Demand and Recessionary Fears

2022-08-04

Like pls

Cathie Wood Went Bargain Shopping, 3 Stocks She Bought Hand Over Fist Last Week

2022-08-02

Like pls

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2022-07-30

Ok

The Stock Market Had a Great July. Why August Could Be Tougher

2022-07-29

Like pls

Want to Ride the Bitcoin Rally? Here Are 2 Bitcoin Mining Stocks That Analysts Like

2022-07-28

Like pls

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2022-07-24

Like pls

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2022-07-23

Like pls

Exxon Mobil: Crisis Time?

2022-07-22

Like pls

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2022-07-20

Like pls

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2022-07-20

Like pls

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2022-07-18

Like pls

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2022-07-17

Like pls

Is the New Netflix-Microsoft Partnership a Massive Mistake?

2022-07-17

Like pls

Tycoon Whose Bet Broke the Nickel Market Walks Away a Billionaire

2022-07-16

Like pls

Bearish ETF Strategies for a Pessimistic Outlook

2022-07-14

Like pls

U.S. Stocks Remained Low in Morning Trading; Dow Jone, Nasdaq and S&P 500 Fell Over 1%

2022-07-14

Like pls

Fed Could Weigh Historic 100 Basis-Point Hike After Inflation Scorcher

2022-07-12

Like pls

U.S. Stocks Turned up in Morning Trading; Dow Jone Gained Nearly 0.4% While S&P 500 Rose Over 0.1%

2022-07-10

Like pls

Shopify Stock Is a Mixed Bag

Go to Tiger App to see more news

Invest in Global Markets with Tiger Brokers!

Open App

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"userPageInfo":{"id":"3572939161983827","uuid":"3572939161983827","gmtCreate":1609845138968,"gmtModify":1616736792334,"name":"RicPuah","pinyin":"ricpuah","introduction":"","introductionEn":null,"signature":"","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f228739d2dbb241334ac0736565c39f6","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":43,"headSize":721,"tweetSize":498,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":3,"name":"书生虎","nameTw":"書生虎","represent":"努力向上","factor":"发布10条非转发主帖,其中5条获得他人回复或点赞","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":"success","userBadges":[{"badgeId":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493-3","templateUuid":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493","name":" Tiger Idol","description":"Join the tiger community for 1500 days","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8b40ae7da5bf081a1c84df14bf9e6367","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f160eceddd7c284a8e1136557615cfad","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/11792805c468334a9b31c39f95a41c6a","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2025.02.14","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"44212b71d0be4ec88898348dbe882e03-1","templateUuid":"44212b71d0be4ec88898348dbe882e03","name":"Boss Tiger","description":"The transaction amount of the securities account reaches $100,000","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c8dfc27c1ee0e25db1c93e9d0b641101","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f43908c142f8a33c78f5bdf0e2897488","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/82165ff19cb8a786e8919f92acee5213","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.07.14","exceedPercentage":"60.71%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1101},{"badgeId":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be-2","templateUuid":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be","name":"Master Trader","description":"Total number of securities or futures transactions reached 100","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ad22cfbe2d05aa393b18e9226e4b0307","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/36702e6ff3ffe46acafee66cc85273ca","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d52eb88fa385cf5abe2616ed63781765","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.28","exceedPercentage":"80.38%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100},{"badgeId":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789-1","templateUuid":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789","name":"Knowledgeable Investor","description":"Traded more than 10 stocks","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e74cc24115c4fbae6154ec1b1041bf47","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d48265cbfd97c57f9048db29f22227b0","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76c6d6898b073c77e1c537ebe9ac1c57","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1102},{"badgeId":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84-1","templateUuid":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84","name":"Real Trader","description":"Completed a transaction","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":5,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":null,"starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"post","tweets":[{"id":9904642761,"gmtCreate":1660044675755,"gmtModify":1703477275318,"author":{"id":"3572939161983827","authorId":"3572939161983827","name":"RicPuah","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f228739d2dbb241334ac0736565c39f6","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3572939161983827","idStr":"3572939161983827"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like pls","listText":"Like pls","text":"Like pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9904642761","repostId":"2257494848","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2257494848","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1660059240,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2257494848?lang=&edition=full_marsco","pubTime":"2022-08-09 23:34","market":"us","language":"en","title":"3 Stocks to Avoid This Week","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2257494848","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"These investments seem pretty vulnerable right now.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Things didn&#39;t work out for my &#34;three stocks to avoid&#34; column last week. The three stocks I thought were going to lose to the market for the week -- <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/W\">Wayfair</a></b>, <b>TrueCar</b>, and <b>Tesla Motors</b> -- rose 16%, climbed 2%, and fell 3%, respectively, averaging out to a 5% increase.</p><p>The <b>S&amp;P 500</b> experienced a 0.4% move higher. I was wrong, as the average return of the three of the investments I figured would fare worse beat the market. I have still been right in 27 of the past 42 weeks.</p><p>Where do I go to next? I see <b>AMTD Digital</b>, <b>Roblox</b>, and <b>Coinbase</b> as stocks you may want to consider steering clear of this week. Let&#39;s go over my near-term concerns with all three investments.</p><h2><b>AMTD Digital</b></h2><p>The past month has been wild -- if not outright ridiculous -- for AMTD Digital. The one-stop platform in Asia for digital solutions went public at $7.80 in mid-July. It opened at $13, and it has only shot higher. Last week alone we saw the stock open at $335.50, hit a high of $2,555.30 a day later, and close at $721.23 on Friday.</p><p>Keep in mind that with 185 million shares outstanding we were talking about a market cap of $472 billion at last week&#39;s peak. There are only eight U.S.-listed stocks with higher market caps, and those are all substantially large blue chip businesses. AMTD putting out a press release early last week -- perplexed by the stock&#39;s buoyancy -- didn&#39;t cool the feeding frenzy.</p><p>AMTD Digital generated just $25.2 million in revenue in fiscal 2021, and revenue growth has been flattish through the first 10 months of fiscal 2022. This is a real business, but the valuation is off the charts right now.</p><h2><b>Roblox</b></h2><p>Roblox has captured the hearts and time of its young player base, but the once blistering growth is starting to slow. Roblox saw its business gains accelerate when we were hunkering down at home during the early stages of the pandemic. Revenue went from rising 56% in 2019 to 82% in 2020 and 108% last year. The year-over-year increases are starting to slow dramatically, decelerating for four consecutive quarters.</p><p>Things don&#39;t appear to be getting any better with Roblox heading into its second-quarter report on Tuesday afternoon. The first quarter was rough, with Roblox posting its first sequential decline in revenue as a public company. Average bookings per daily active user also hit a post-pandemic low. After posting larger than expected losses in back-to-back quarters Roblox has a lot to prove this week.</p><h2><b>Coinbase</b></h2><p>Shares of Coinbase have more than doubled since bottoming out in May. Is the rally warranted? It&#39;s true that cryptocurrencies have started to bounce back after a brutal drawdown earlier this year. Coinbase is also in much better financial shape than the other more aggressive platforms that buckled under the weight of their own risk-taking practices.</p><p>Like Roblox, Coinbase will be reporting fresh financial results shortly after Tuesday&#39;s market close. It won&#39;t be pretty. Analysts see revenue cut by more than half from prior year levels. All Wall Street pros following the leading crypto exchange are bracing for the once high-margin Coinbase to clock in with a quarterly loss.</p><p>It&#39;s going to be a bumpy road for some of these investments. If you&#39;re looking for safe stocks, you aren&#39;t likely to find them in AMTD Digital, Roblox, and Coinbase this week.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>3 Stocks to Avoid This Week</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n3 Stocks to Avoid This Week\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-08-09 23:34 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/08/08/3-stocks-to-avoid-this-week/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Things didn't work out for my \"three stocks to avoid\" column last week. The three stocks I thought were going to lose to the market for the week -- Wayfair, TrueCar, and Tesla Motors -- rose 16%, ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/08/08/3-stocks-to-avoid-this-week/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AMTD":"Amtd Idea","RBLX":"Roblox Corporation"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/08/08/3-stocks-to-avoid-this-week/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2257494848","content_text":"Things didn't work out for my \"three stocks to avoid\" column last week. The three stocks I thought were going to lose to the market for the week -- Wayfair, TrueCar, and Tesla Motors -- rose 16%, climbed 2%, and fell 3%, respectively, averaging out to a 5% increase.The S&P 500 experienced a 0.4% move higher. I was wrong, as the average return of the three of the investments I figured would fare worse beat the market. I have still been right in 27 of the past 42 weeks.Where do I go to next? I see AMTD Digital, Roblox, and Coinbase as stocks you may want to consider steering clear of this week. Let's go over my near-term concerns with all three investments.AMTD DigitalThe past month has been wild -- if not outright ridiculous -- for AMTD Digital. The one-stop platform in Asia for digital solutions went public at $7.80 in mid-July. It opened at $13, and it has only shot higher. Last week alone we saw the stock open at $335.50, hit a high of $2,555.30 a day later, and close at $721.23 on Friday.Keep in mind that with 185 million shares outstanding we were talking about a market cap of $472 billion at last week's peak. There are only eight U.S.-listed stocks with higher market caps, and those are all substantially large blue chip businesses. AMTD putting out a press release early last week -- perplexed by the stock's buoyancy -- didn't cool the feeding frenzy.AMTD Digital generated just $25.2 million in revenue in fiscal 2021, and revenue growth has been flattish through the first 10 months of fiscal 2022. This is a real business, but the valuation is off the charts right now.RobloxRoblox has captured the hearts and time of its young player base, but the once blistering growth is starting to slow. Roblox saw its business gains accelerate when we were hunkering down at home during the early stages of the pandemic. Revenue went from rising 56% in 2019 to 82% in 2020 and 108% last year. The year-over-year increases are starting to slow dramatically, decelerating for four consecutive quarters.Things don't appear to be getting any better with Roblox heading into its second-quarter report on Tuesday afternoon. The first quarter was rough, with Roblox posting its first sequential decline in revenue as a public company. Average bookings per daily active user also hit a post-pandemic low. After posting larger than expected losses in back-to-back quarters Roblox has a lot to prove this week.CoinbaseShares of Coinbase have more than doubled since bottoming out in May. Is the rally warranted? It's true that cryptocurrencies have started to bounce back after a brutal drawdown earlier this year. Coinbase is also in much better financial shape than the other more aggressive platforms that buckled under the weight of their own risk-taking practices.Like Roblox, Coinbase will be reporting fresh financial results shortly after Tuesday's market close. It won't be pretty. Analysts see revenue cut by more than half from prior year levels. All Wall Street pros following the leading crypto exchange are bracing for the once high-margin Coinbase to clock in with a quarterly loss.It's going to be a bumpy road for some of these investments. If you're looking for safe stocks, you aren't likely to find them in AMTD Digital, Roblox, and Coinbase this week.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1265,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9902338859,"gmtCreate":1659653010774,"gmtModify":1705590836926,"author":{"id":"3572939161983827","authorId":"3572939161983827","name":"RicPuah","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f228739d2dbb241334ac0736565c39f6","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3572939161983827","idStr":"3572939161983827"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like&nbsp;pls","listText":"Like&nbsp;pls","text":"Like pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9902338859","repostId":"1168318366","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1168318366","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1659626251,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1168318366?lang=&edition=full_marsco","pubTime":"2022-08-04 23:17","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Oil Falls Below $90 on Weaker US Gasoline Demand and Recessionary Fears","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1168318366","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"(Bloomberg) -- Oil extended declines to the lowest in almost six months as weaker US gasoline demand","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>(Bloomberg) -- Oil extended declines to the lowest in almost six months as weaker US gasoline demand and recessionary fears weighed on markets.</p><p>West Texas Intermediate dropped below $90 a barrel, a level last seen in the weeks leading up to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. This week’s descent was touched off by government data showing Americans are driving less than they did in the summer of 2020. Fears of an economic slowdown have intensified along with the potential impacts on crude demand.</p><p>Prices falling below $90 a barrel “is quite remarkable given how tight the market remains and how little scope there is to relieve that,” said Craig Erlam, senior market analyst at Oanda. “But recession talk is getting louder and should it become reality, it will likely address some of the imbalance. Just not in the way we’d like.”</p><p>Crude has now given up all of the gains triggered by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February. Since peaking at more than $130 a barrel in March, the US benchmark has been dragged lower by signs that Moscow is still getting its cargoes onto the global market and escalating investor concerns that a global slowdown will erode energy consumption.</p><p>Despite the recent price weaknesses, Saudi Arabia raised its oil prices for buyers in Asia to a record level, a sign the world’s largest exporter sees the region’s market remaining tight. OPEC+ agreed to boost supply by a meager 100,000 barrels a day in September, while issuing a stark warning on “severely limited” spare capacity.</p><p>Saudis Signal Oil Market Will Stay Tight With Price Hike</p><p>The oil market continues to be in backwardation, a bullish pattern in which near-term contracts are trading higher than later-dated ones, yet key differentials have narrowed. WTI’s nearest backwardation fell below $1 a barrel this week for the first time since April, signaling that underlying physical tightness is easing off as the peak summer driving season is coming to an end.</p><p>The extremely modest output increase from OPEC+ came despite a visit by Joe Biden to Saudi Arabia last month, when the US president urged producers to add supplies as part of his efforts to rein in inflation. Still, his administration can take heart from the steady retreat in average retail gasoline prices, which have dropped by almost $1 a gallon since hitting a record in mid-June.</p></body></html>","source":"lsy1584095487587","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Oil Falls Below $90 on Weaker US Gasoline Demand and Recessionary Fears</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nOil Falls Below $90 on Weaker US Gasoline Demand and Recessionary Fears\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-08-04 23:17 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-08-03/oil-edges-higher-after-slump-as-traders-weigh-opec-hike-demand#xj4y7vzkg><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>(Bloomberg) -- Oil extended declines to the lowest in almost six months as weaker US gasoline demand and recessionary fears weighed on markets.West Texas Intermediate dropped below $90 a barrel, a ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-08-03/oil-edges-higher-after-slump-as-traders-weigh-opec-hike-demand#xj4y7vzkg\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-08-03/oil-edges-higher-after-slump-as-traders-weigh-opec-hike-demand#xj4y7vzkg","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1168318366","content_text":"(Bloomberg) -- Oil extended declines to the lowest in almost six months as weaker US gasoline demand and recessionary fears weighed on markets.West Texas Intermediate dropped below $90 a barrel, a level last seen in the weeks leading up to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. This week’s descent was touched off by government data showing Americans are driving less than they did in the summer of 2020. Fears of an economic slowdown have intensified along with the potential impacts on crude demand.Prices falling below $90 a barrel “is quite remarkable given how tight the market remains and how little scope there is to relieve that,” said Craig Erlam, senior market analyst at Oanda. “But recession talk is getting louder and should it become reality, it will likely address some of the imbalance. Just not in the way we’d like.”Crude has now given up all of the gains triggered by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February. Since peaking at more than $130 a barrel in March, the US benchmark has been dragged lower by signs that Moscow is still getting its cargoes onto the global market and escalating investor concerns that a global slowdown will erode energy consumption.Despite the recent price weaknesses, Saudi Arabia raised its oil prices for buyers in Asia to a record level, a sign the world’s largest exporter sees the region’s market remaining tight. OPEC+ agreed to boost supply by a meager 100,000 barrels a day in September, while issuing a stark warning on “severely limited” spare capacity.Saudis Signal Oil Market Will Stay Tight With Price HikeThe oil market continues to be in backwardation, a bullish pattern in which near-term contracts are trading higher than later-dated ones, yet key differentials have narrowed. WTI’s nearest backwardation fell below $1 a barrel this week for the first time since April, signaling that underlying physical tightness is easing off as the peak summer driving season is coming to an end.The extremely modest output increase from OPEC+ came despite a visit by Joe Biden to Saudi Arabia last month, when the US president urged producers to add supplies as part of his efforts to rein in inflation. Still, his administration can take heart from the steady retreat in average retail gasoline prices, which have dropped by almost $1 a gallon since hitting a record in mid-June.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":946,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9902047735,"gmtCreate":1659620479830,"gmtModify":1705988287356,"author":{"id":"3572939161983827","authorId":"3572939161983827","name":"RicPuah","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f228739d2dbb241334ac0736565c39f6","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3572939161983827","idStr":"3572939161983827"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like pls","listText":"Like pls","text":"Like pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9902047735","repostId":"2256275479","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2256275479","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1659625409,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2256275479?lang=&edition=full_marsco","pubTime":"2022-08-04 23:03","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Cathie Wood Went Bargain Shopping, 3 Stocks She Bought Hand Over Fist Last Week","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2256275479","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"There are always bargains to be had if you just know where to look.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Cathie Wood closed out July on a buying spree. The co-founder and CEO of ARK Investment Management was combing through the second-quarter earnings reports of beaten-down stocks last week, and some of her picks might surprise you.</p><p>So what did she buy? Wood&#39;s exchange-traded funds (ETFs) added to existing stakes in <b>Roku</b>, <b>Shopify</b>, and <b>Teladoc</b>. Let&#39;s see if we can figure out what she sees in these former highfliers that have been abandoned by many investors.</p><h2><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ROKU\">Roku</a></h2><p>There&#39;s no question that streaming video growth has hit a speed bump in recent months, as people headed back out into the world after enduring pandemic-related restrictions. Yet cord-cutting remains at near-epidemic proportions, and viewers will need to get their entertainment fix somewhere, which suggests that the growth of streaming media is far from over.</p><p>Roku has slumped 82% from its all-time high reached in mid-2021. However, the falling stock price doesn&#39;t mean its growth streak is over. Roku&#39;s revenue rose 18% year over year in its latest quarter, though it swung to a loss, spooking investors.</p><p>Streaming hours and active accounts grew 19% and 14%, respectively, continuing Roku&#39;s unbroken growth streak. Overlooked by investors was the company&#39;s average revenue per user (ARPU), which climbed 21%. This means Roku is making more from each successive viewer and suggests that once growth inevitably accelerates, profitability will surge.</p><p>Roku is the industry leader in a growing market, and while it has fallen on tough times, the future remains bright, which likely contributed to Wood&#39;s decision to buy shares even as the stock slid.</p><h2><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SHOP\">Shopify</a></h2><p>Another stock that&#39;s been left for dead by investors is Shopify. Investors have convinced themselves that e-commerce growth has peaked, sending Shopify shares down roughly 77% from its high hit late last year.</p><p>Yet even as Shopify stock has plunged, growth has trudged higher. In Q2, revenue climbed 16% year over year, even in the face of tough comps, though expenses weighed on the bottom line. Shopify announced a series of cost-cutting measures -- including lay-offs -- that should help it return to profitability.</p><p>While online retail growth has hit a speed bump, it&#39;s far from over. In fact, in the 10 years prior to the pandemic, e-commerce sales more than doubled, growing from roughly 4% of total retail to nearly 10%. This suggests the pause in digital sales growth is merely temporary.</p><p>As the leading provider of tools that help merchants join the e-commerce revolution, Shopify is well positioned to benefit from this ongoing trend, which is why Wood continues to buy shares.</p><h2><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TDOC\">Teladoc</a></h2><p>There&#39;s no doubt that the adoption of telehealth has slowed, weighing on Teladoc&#39;s stock price in the process, which is now down 76% from its peak reached early last year. That doesn&#39;t mean its growth is over, which is why Wood has been buying Teladoc shares by the fistful.</p><p>Q2 revenue grew 18% year over year, and while its losses mounted, much of that was the result of non-cash goodwill impairment charges related to its purchase of Livongo Health. Perhaps more importantly, total patient visits grew by 31% year over year, while its chronic care patients climbed 13%.</p><p>The ease and convenience of telemedicine hasn&#39;t changed, and patients who have used virtual consultations to meet with doctors and other medical professionals will continue to do so, though growth may come at a slower pace. Teladoc expects total visits of roughly 19 million in 2022, resulting in revenue growth of about 21% at the midpoint of its guidance. Given the write-offs, it&#39;s doubtful the company will be profitable this year, but that thing they say in the exercise community applies just as well to the investing experience. No pain, no gain! Teladoc will get back to making profits in the long run, so investors should pounce while shares are cheap.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Cathie Wood Went Bargain Shopping, 3 Stocks She Bought Hand Over Fist Last Week</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nCathie Wood Went Bargain Shopping, 3 Stocks She Bought Hand Over Fist Last Week\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-08-04 23:03 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/08/04/cathie-wood-went-bargain-shopping-for-3-stocks/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Cathie Wood closed out July on a buying spree. The co-founder and CEO of ARK Investment Management was combing through the second-quarter earnings reports of beaten-down stocks last week, and some of ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/08/04/cathie-wood-went-bargain-shopping-for-3-stocks/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SHOP":"Shopify Inc","ROKU":"Roku Inc","TDOC":"Teladoc Health Inc."},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/08/04/cathie-wood-went-bargain-shopping-for-3-stocks/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2256275479","content_text":"Cathie Wood closed out July on a buying spree. The co-founder and CEO of ARK Investment Management was combing through the second-quarter earnings reports of beaten-down stocks last week, and some of her picks might surprise you.So what did she buy? Wood's exchange-traded funds (ETFs) added to existing stakes in Roku, Shopify, and Teladoc. Let's see if we can figure out what she sees in these former highfliers that have been abandoned by many investors.RokuThere's no question that streaming video growth has hit a speed bump in recent months, as people headed back out into the world after enduring pandemic-related restrictions. Yet cord-cutting remains at near-epidemic proportions, and viewers will need to get their entertainment fix somewhere, which suggests that the growth of streaming media is far from over.Roku has slumped 82% from its all-time high reached in mid-2021. However, the falling stock price doesn't mean its growth streak is over. Roku's revenue rose 18% year over year in its latest quarter, though it swung to a loss, spooking investors.Streaming hours and active accounts grew 19% and 14%, respectively, continuing Roku's unbroken growth streak. Overlooked by investors was the company's average revenue per user (ARPU), which climbed 21%. This means Roku is making more from each successive viewer and suggests that once growth inevitably accelerates, profitability will surge.Roku is the industry leader in a growing market, and while it has fallen on tough times, the future remains bright, which likely contributed to Wood's decision to buy shares even as the stock slid.ShopifyAnother stock that's been left for dead by investors is Shopify. Investors have convinced themselves that e-commerce growth has peaked, sending Shopify shares down roughly 77% from its high hit late last year.Yet even as Shopify stock has plunged, growth has trudged higher. In Q2, revenue climbed 16% year over year, even in the face of tough comps, though expenses weighed on the bottom line. Shopify announced a series of cost-cutting measures -- including lay-offs -- that should help it return to profitability.While online retail growth has hit a speed bump, it's far from over. In fact, in the 10 years prior to the pandemic, e-commerce sales more than doubled, growing from roughly 4% of total retail to nearly 10%. This suggests the pause in digital sales growth is merely temporary.As the leading provider of tools that help merchants join the e-commerce revolution, Shopify is well positioned to benefit from this ongoing trend, which is why Wood continues to buy shares.TeladocThere's no doubt that the adoption of telehealth has slowed, weighing on Teladoc's stock price in the process, which is now down 76% from its peak reached early last year. That doesn't mean its growth is over, which is why Wood has been buying Teladoc shares by the fistful.Q2 revenue grew 18% year over year, and while its losses mounted, much of that was the result of non-cash goodwill impairment charges related to its purchase of Livongo Health. Perhaps more importantly, total patient visits grew by 31% year over year, while its chronic care patients climbed 13%.The ease and convenience of telemedicine hasn't changed, and patients who have used virtual consultations to meet with doctors and other medical professionals will continue to do so, though growth may come at a slower pace. Teladoc expects total visits of roughly 19 million in 2022, resulting in revenue growth of about 21% at the midpoint of its guidance. Given the write-offs, it's doubtful the company will be profitable this year, but that thing they say in the exercise community applies just as well to the investing experience. No pain, no gain! Teladoc will get back to making profits in the long run, so investors should pounce while shares are cheap.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1352,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9908278694,"gmtCreate":1659399082418,"gmtModify":1705979892074,"author":{"id":"3572939161983827","authorId":"3572939161983827","name":"RicPuah","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f228739d2dbb241334ac0736565c39f6","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3572939161983827","idStr":"3572939161983827"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like pls","listText":"Like pls","text":"Like pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9908278694","repostId":"2256069170","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1488,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9901282333,"gmtCreate":1659224800322,"gmtModify":1676536272332,"author":{"id":"3572939161983827","authorId":"3572939161983827","name":"RicPuah","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f228739d2dbb241334ac0736565c39f6","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3572939161983827","idStr":"3572939161983827"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9901282333","repostId":"2255591959","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2255591959","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1659147333,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2255591959?lang=&edition=full_marsco","pubTime":"2022-07-30 10:15","market":"us","language":"en","title":"The Stock Market Had a Great July. Why August Could Be Tougher","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2255591959","media":"Barrons","summary":"Stocks rallied this past week as investors bet that the Federal Reserve has reached peak hawkishness","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Stocks rallied this past week as investors bet that the Federal Reserve has reached peak hawkishness. That’s wishful thinking.</p><p>The Dow Jones Industrial Averagerose 3%, the S&amp;P 500index added 4.3%, and the Nasdaq Composite surged 4.7%. All three had their best months since 2020. Even the premium paid for high-yield bonds over Treasuries narrowed considerably.</p><p>Yet it was a strange week for celebration. The U.S. economy saw back-to-back quarters of declining real gross domestic product in the first half of 2022, the Fed’s favored measure of inflation remained stubbornly high, and the central bank raised interest rates by another three-quarters of a point, making this one of the fastest hiking cycles of the past 40 years.</p><p>What did change are expectations for future rate hikes, hinging largely on two sentences from Fed Chairman Jerome Powell’s news conference.</p><p>“While another unusually large increase could be appropriate at our next meeting, that is a decision that will depend on the data we get between now and then,” he said. “As the stance of monetary policy tightens further, it likely will become appropriate to slow the pace of increases.” Powell even said that interest rates, now at a range of 2.25% to 2.5%, are likely at “neutral,” meaning they are neither accommodative nor restrictive.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/aee1cf63ce76ac088586635d0db75666\" tg-width=\"956\" tg-height=\"635\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>The market took that message to heart. Six weeks ago, interest-rate futures were pricing in a peak federal-funds rate target range of 3.75% to 4% in early 2023. Today, that peak is implied at 3.25 to 3.5% in December, just a point above the current target. Furthermore, futures pricing now implies two quarter-point rate cuts from February to July 2023. In other words, the market is betting the Fed will slow down the pace of its rate increases by the end of this year, then rapidly switch to easing policy.</p><p>Powell’s comments about the neutral rate also drew the ire of some well-known economists and investors. Former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers called Powell’s comment on the neutral rate “indefensible,” while Pershing Square’s Bill Ackman unleashed a late-night tweetstorm on the subject. “While 2.25 to 2.25% may be a neutral rate with 2% inflation, it is an extremely accommodative rate with inflation at 9%,” he wrote late on Thursday night, while isolating with Covid-19.</p><p>The implied rate path also seems highly unlikely—and almost certainly not good for the stock market. For it to develop, the Fed would have to either declare victory in its fight against rising prices—does anyone expect inflation to magically collapse to 2% by year end?—or give up the battle altogether to rescue an economy that is rapidly sinking into recession. So, while the pace of tightening may be moderating and inflation may have peaked—famous last words, we know—it’s far from a green light for investors.</p><p>Given a slowing economy, still-rising interest rates, and stock and bond indexes at or near short-term overbought levels, it might be time to sell the rally and rebalance into higher-quality or defensive areas.</p><p>“Credit spreads have continued to pull tighter…on a market narrative that a dovish pivot could be warranted,” wrote Goldman Sachs’ chief credit strategist, Lotfi Karoui, on Thursday. “We disagree, given the likely forward path of inflation, and would continue to fade the rally, using it as an opportunity to cut risk and rotate further up in quality.”</p><p>It’s too early to declare a Fed pivot and an all-clear for bullish investors. This inflation surge isn’t likely to be tamed that easily.</p></body></html>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>The Stock Market Had a Great July. Why August Could Be Tougher</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nThe Stock Market Had a Great July. Why August Could Be Tougher\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-07-30 10:15 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.barrons.com/articles/stock-market-news-dow-nasdaq-sp500-51659132219?mod=hp_LEAD_2><strong>Barrons</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Stocks rallied this past week as investors bet that the Federal Reserve has reached peak hawkishness. That’s wishful thinking.The Dow Jones Industrial Averagerose 3%, the S&P 500index added 4.3%, and ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/stock-market-news-dow-nasdaq-sp500-51659132219?mod=hp_LEAD_2\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/stock-market-news-dow-nasdaq-sp500-51659132219?mod=hp_LEAD_2","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2255591959","content_text":"Stocks rallied this past week as investors bet that the Federal Reserve has reached peak hawkishness. That’s wishful thinking.The Dow Jones Industrial Averagerose 3%, the S&P 500index added 4.3%, and the Nasdaq Composite surged 4.7%. All three had their best months since 2020. Even the premium paid for high-yield bonds over Treasuries narrowed considerably.Yet it was a strange week for celebration. The U.S. economy saw back-to-back quarters of declining real gross domestic product in the first half of 2022, the Fed’s favored measure of inflation remained stubbornly high, and the central bank raised interest rates by another three-quarters of a point, making this one of the fastest hiking cycles of the past 40 years.What did change are expectations for future rate hikes, hinging largely on two sentences from Fed Chairman Jerome Powell’s news conference.“While another unusually large increase could be appropriate at our next meeting, that is a decision that will depend on the data we get between now and then,” he said. “As the stance of monetary policy tightens further, it likely will become appropriate to slow the pace of increases.” Powell even said that interest rates, now at a range of 2.25% to 2.5%, are likely at “neutral,” meaning they are neither accommodative nor restrictive.The market took that message to heart. Six weeks ago, interest-rate futures were pricing in a peak federal-funds rate target range of 3.75% to 4% in early 2023. Today, that peak is implied at 3.25 to 3.5% in December, just a point above the current target. Furthermore, futures pricing now implies two quarter-point rate cuts from February to July 2023. In other words, the market is betting the Fed will slow down the pace of its rate increases by the end of this year, then rapidly switch to easing policy.Powell’s comments about the neutral rate also drew the ire of some well-known economists and investors. Former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers called Powell’s comment on the neutral rate “indefensible,” while Pershing Square’s Bill Ackman unleashed a late-night tweetstorm on the subject. “While 2.25 to 2.25% may be a neutral rate with 2% inflation, it is an extremely accommodative rate with inflation at 9%,” he wrote late on Thursday night, while isolating with Covid-19.The implied rate path also seems highly unlikely—and almost certainly not good for the stock market. For it to develop, the Fed would have to either declare victory in its fight against rising prices—does anyone expect inflation to magically collapse to 2% by year end?—or give up the battle altogether to rescue an economy that is rapidly sinking into recession. So, while the pace of tightening may be moderating and inflation may have peaked—famous last words, we know—it’s far from a green light for investors.Given a slowing economy, still-rising interest rates, and stock and bond indexes at or near short-term overbought levels, it might be time to sell the rally and rebalance into higher-quality or defensive areas.“Credit spreads have continued to pull tighter…on a market narrative that a dovish pivot could be warranted,” wrote Goldman Sachs’ chief credit strategist, Lotfi Karoui, on Thursday. “We disagree, given the likely forward path of inflation, and would continue to fade the rally, using it as an opportunity to cut risk and rotate further up in quality.”It’s too early to declare a Fed pivot and an all-clear for bullish investors. This inflation surge isn’t likely to be tamed that easily.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1137,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9901391012,"gmtCreate":1659137090836,"gmtModify":1676536261409,"author":{"id":"3572939161983827","authorId":"3572939161983827","name":"RicPuah","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f228739d2dbb241334ac0736565c39f6","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3572939161983827","idStr":"3572939161983827"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like pls","listText":"Like pls","text":"Like pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9901391012","repostId":"2255930052","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2255930052","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1659108180,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2255930052?lang=&edition=full_marsco","pubTime":"2022-07-29 23:23","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Want to Ride the Bitcoin Rally? Here Are 2 Bitcoin Mining Stocks That Analysts Like","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2255930052","media":"TipRanks","summary":"The Federal Reserve raised rates this week, by another 0.75%, toughening up its anti-inflationary st","content":"<div>\n<p>The Federal Reserve raised rates this week, by another 0.75%, toughening up its anti-inflationary stance. At the same time, Fed chair Jerome Powell indicated that the central bank may slow its pace on...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/want-ride-bitcoin-rally-2-001112120.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Want to Ride the Bitcoin Rally? Here Are 2 Bitcoin Mining Stocks That Analysts Like</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWant to Ride the Bitcoin Rally? Here Are 2 Bitcoin Mining Stocks That Analysts Like\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-07-29 23:23 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/want-ride-bitcoin-rally-2-001112120.html><strong>TipRanks</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The Federal Reserve raised rates this week, by another 0.75%, toughening up its anti-inflationary stance. At the same time, Fed chair Jerome Powell indicated that the central bank may slow its pace on...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/want-ride-bitcoin-rally-2-001112120.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"CLSK":"CleanSpark, Inc.","ARBK":"Argo Blockchain Plc","BK4023":"应用软件"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/want-ride-bitcoin-rally-2-001112120.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2255930052","content_text":"The Federal Reserve raised rates this week, by another 0.75%, toughening up its anti-inflationary stance. At the same time, Fed chair Jerome Powell indicated that the central bank may slow its pace on rate hikes, which gives some hope for a ‘soft landing,’ that may curb inflation while avoiding a deep recession. Markets rallied strongly in response to the Fed news.The rally has made its way to cryptos, too, which have been tracking US stocks closely this summer. In particular, the largest crypto, Bitcoin, is up 21% this month.Nexo crypto wallet co-founder Antoni Trenchev sees these developments as net gains, and predicts further near-term rally in BTC in his comments on the Fed meeting: “The conclusion of Wednesday’s Fed meeting opens up a summer window for a Bitcoin relief rally, given we now have two months until policymakers next deliberate on monetary policy.”So it’s an interesting time to look at bitcoin mining stocks, which are highly correlated to the price of BTC. Using the TipRanks database, we identified two such equities that have received bullish praise from the Street, enough to earn a “Strong Buy” consensus rating. Let's take a closer look.CleanSpark (CLSK)The first bitcoin miner we’ll look at it CleanSpark, a company with double-barreled focus – one barrel targeting bitcoin mining and the other aimed at clean energy. CleanSpark produces software products that allow close control of distributed energy systems, microgrids, and other off-the-grid power systems based on ‘green’ energy such as solar, wind, or nuclear. In CleanSpark’s particular case, it uses this technology to power its bitcoin mining operations.Those bitcoin mining ops are substantial. CleanSpark currently operates four mining facilities, in Texas, Georgia, and New York, and this month announced an expansion of mining capacity totaling 90 petahashes. This expansion was powered by the acquisition of new, ‘latest generation’ mining servers, 1,061 Whatsminer M30S machines, installed a facilities co-operated with Coinmint. In addition, CleanSpark also announced, in June, acquisition of a purchase contract for 1,800 Antminer S19 XP machines, along with water cooling infrastructure, for its mining facilities. These machines, when installed, will add another 252 petahashes per second to CleanSpark’s mining capabilities.As of the end of June, CleanSpark’s BTC production had totaled 1,863 for the year. June’s production was 339, and production hit a company record-high rate of 12.1 BTC per day. The hash rate increased 12% from May, to a total hash rate of 2.8 EH/s. CleanSpark held a total of 561 BTC as of June 30, after converting 328 to pay for June operations.Production on this scale delivered revenue of $41.6 million in the quarter ended March 31, compared to just $8.1 million in the year-ago quarter.Assuming coverage of CLSK for H.C. Wainwright, analyst Mike Colonnese likes what he sees in the company’s prospects for continued growth.\"With a strong track record of solid execution and 600 megawatts (MW) of mining infrastructure already secured (capable of supporting ~20 EH/s), we are confident in CLSK’s future growth and ability to continue to win market share. As a top five miner with 2.8 EH/s of active hashing power, CLSK produced 339 BTC in the month of June (over 11/day). By our calculation, this makes CLSK the most efficient bitcoin miner in the industry (with an active EH/s >1),\" Colonnese opined.“We believe the risk/reward profile for shares of CLSK is very favorable at current levels,\" the analyst summed up.To this end, Colonnese rates CLSK shares a Buy, and his $6 price target implies a one-year potential gain of ~43% for the stock.Overall, this small-cap bitcoin miner holds a Strong Buy consensus rating from the Wall Street analysts, and that rating is unanimous, based on 3 recent positive analyst reviews. The stock is selling for $4.20 and its $11.00 average price target indicates possible gain of ~162% in the year ahead.Argo Blockchain (ARBK)Next up is Argo Blockchain, a crypto mining firm based in London with its operations in North America. Argo has three active crypto mining facilities, one, Helios, located in Dickens County, Texas, and two located in Quebec, at Baie Comeau and Mirabel. The Mirabel facility is the smallest and the Texan location the largest; altogether, Argo boasts some 45 megawatts of power generation supporting 2.2 EH/s of bitcoin mining and 280 MS of equihash ZCash mining.Last month the company mined a total of 179 bitcoins, and increase of 44% over the May total of 124. The company sold off 637 bitcoin during the month to fund operations. Those operations included the ongoing expansion of the Helios crytpomining facility. Argo entered a contract for delivery and installation of 20,000 mining machines purchased from Bitmain; it is on track to complete this installation by October of this year. As of June 30, Argo held 1,953 bitcoin in its assets.Despite its solid production, growing exahash rate, and expanding operational footprint, Argo’s share price has been declining since its IPO last fall. The stock started trading on September 23, and closed its first day on the NASDAQ at $16.75; the stock is down 71% since then.5-star analyst Darren Aftahi, of Roth Capital, has been covering Argo, and in his look at the company’s recent results he sees plenty of reason for longer-term optimism. Aftahi writes, “Helios began mining in early May and should provide a modest lift to 2Q mining capacity and a larger impact in 2H22 as ARBK looks to reach its 5.5 EH/s ending hash rate target... Overall, we remain encouraged that Helios should begin to enable ARBK to increase its network share back towards 1% by year-end and do so with little dilution risk to shareholders.”Going on from these comments, Aftahi sets a Buy rating on ARBK shares – along with a $11 price target that indicates his confidence in a robust 142% upside for the next 12 months.Argo has piqued the curiosity and attention of 5 Wall Street analysts, who have combined to give the shares a unanimous Strong Buy consensus rating. ARBK is currently trading for $4.84 and has an average price target of $11.40; this gives the stock a one-year upside potential of 135%.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":868,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9903246840,"gmtCreate":1659049928180,"gmtModify":1676536248221,"author":{"id":"3572939161983827","authorId":"3572939161983827","name":"RicPuah","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f228739d2dbb241334ac0736565c39f6","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3572939161983827","idStr":"3572939161983827"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like pls","listText":"Like pls","text":"Like pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9903246840","repostId":"2255306989","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1112,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9900870943,"gmtCreate":1658703721782,"gmtModify":1676536192507,"author":{"id":"3572939161983827","authorId":"3572939161983827","name":"RicPuah","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f228739d2dbb241334ac0736565c39f6","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3572939161983827","idStr":"3572939161983827"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like pls","listText":"Like pls","text":"Like pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9900870943","repostId":"2253060728","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":905,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9077794717,"gmtCreate":1658574944139,"gmtModify":1676536178444,"author":{"id":"3572939161983827","authorId":"3572939161983827","name":"RicPuah","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f228739d2dbb241334ac0736565c39f6","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3572939161983827","idStr":"3572939161983827"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like pls","listText":"Like pls","text":"Like pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9077794717","repostId":"1177888616","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1177888616","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1658537548,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1177888616?lang=&edition=full_marsco","pubTime":"2022-07-23 08:52","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Exxon Mobil: Crisis Time?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1177888616","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"SummaryThe world is experiencing a massive energy crisis. Markets are very tight for oil, natural ga","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Summary</p><ul><li>The world is experiencing a massive energy crisis. Markets are very tight for oil, natural gas, LNG, and refined products.</li><li>XOM will thrive in this environment, as its profits and cash flow are soaring.</li><li>Investors can expect huge payouts, as XOM has to put its cash to use. The energy crisis is bad for the world but good for XOM and its owners.</li></ul><h3>Article Thesis</h3><p>The world is currently experiencing a major energy crisis. Exxon Mobil (NYSE:XOM), as one of the largest energy companies in the world, is well-positioned to benefit from that.</p><p>Exxon Mobil will likely be immensely profitablethis year, and some believe that oil prices and natural gas prices will climb further during H2. But even if oil prices were to pull back, Exxon Mobil could remain a pretty profitable company that offers compelling shareholder return potential.</p><h3>The World&#39;s In An Energy Crisis</h3><p>For many years, governments, NGOs, and even many companies have been talking about a shift towards renewable energy. Many companies even pushed themselves toward becoming greener. But the world&#39;s energy hunger continues to grow, and so far, renewables aren&#39;t able to supply the energy the world needs. There had been calls fordropping oil priceswith the purported reason for those falling prices being that a growing number of EVs will reduce global oil consumption. But at least so far, those predictions have not come true at all. In fact, oil demand around the globe continues to rise, as EV buying has not put any dent in the world&#39;s hunger for diesel, gasoline, etc.</p><p>That is not too surprising. There are hundreds of millions of gas-powered cars in the world, and several dozen billion of new gas-powered cars are added every year. The fact that a much smaller number of EVs are also sold per year does not mean that the overall number of gas-powered cars is shrinking. Ships, machinery, trucks, airplanes, and so on also all need oil or oil-derived products, as there is no possibility to power those with electricity at scale.</p><p>Add to that oil demand for other purposes, such as the production of plastics or the manufacturing of medicine, and the demand picture looks very strong. OPEC announced its demandestimatesfor 2022 and 2023 a couple of weeks ago. The cartel believes that global oil demand will rise by 3.4 million barrels per day, while another 2 million barrels per day of additional demand is expected for 2023. In total, this means that global oil demand will grow by 5 million barrels or even more from 2021 to 2023. This is, for reference, roughly half of Saudi Arabia&#39;s production in additional demand.</p><p>I do believe that there is also a good chance that oil demand could continue to grow in 2024 and beyond. Billions of people in developing and emerging countries want to raise their standard of living. They want to purchase cars, travel, live in larger homes, and so on. Add to that resilient strong demand from industrial nations, despite their efforts to grow renewable energy output, and the global oil demand picture looks very healthy.</p><p>At the same time, global demand for natural gas is also very strong. It is needed as a component for the chemicals industry, is used for cooking and heating (where demand is very resilient versus recessions), and it is increasingly used for electricity generation.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8eb6ada33dfb86d5a248cdea12a22800\" tg-width=\"850\" tg-height=\"600\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>BP Energy review</span></p><p>In the above chart, we see that global consumption of natural gas has risen drastically over the last two decades. Even consumption of coal has risen, and that is a much dirtier fuel, both when it comes to CO2 emissions as well as when it comes to other emissions, such as NOX and particulates. From an ESG and public health perspective, it makes a lot more sense to use natural gas than coal. It thus seems reasonable to assume that coal will be the first energy source to be phased out. Replacing it with natural gas as a weather-and daytime-independent energy source (unlike wind and solar) would make sense, and would be highly beneficial for global natural gas demand.</p><p>The demand picture for both oil and gas is thus very healthy. And yet, supply is constrained. Energy companies have underinvested for years, starting in 2014, when oil prices first started to drop. A growing focus on free cash generation has led to less growth investment. Add unaccommodating policies and growing regulation from different governments around the world, pressure from ESG-friendly investors, and insufficient offtake capacity (pipelines not being allowed), and energy companies had a lot of reasons not to invest heavily into new production.</p><p>So demand is strong and continues to grow, and at the same time, supply is constrained, as the world has tried to move away from fossil fuels too fast. The result is an environment where markets are very tight and where inventories decline, which leads to high energy prices. This is especially true when it comes to natural gas in Europe, where supply disruptions due to the Russia-Ukraine war add even more upwards pressure on prices.</p><h3>XOM: An Energy Giant That Should Benefit</h3><p>When markets are tight and prices are high, producers/suppliers of the in-demand goods naturally benefit. Exxon Mobil is the largest supermajor in the world in terms of production and market capitalization, and it should be one of the biggest beneficiaries of the current situation. It did, for the record, not cause this situation. In fact, it had been withstanding different forces (Engine No. 1, NY AG, etc.) that wanted to force it to produce less oil and gas -- if those had succeeded, the energy crisis would be even larger, as global supply would be even lower.</p><p>Exxon Mobil generated free cash flows of $11 billion during the first quarter, but the second quarter most likely was way stronger.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f765ed181d27b18cddc2a7fa72dcc071\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"433\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>From the beginning of the first quarter to the end of the second quarter, both WTI oil and US natural gas rose by around 50%. That naturally benefits Exxon Mobil&#39;s profits. On top of that, Exxon Mobil&#39;s profits rose due to an increase in American crack spreads, which makes its refining business more profitable, all else equal. As a result, Exxon Mobil hasstatedthat its refining profit in Q2 could rise by up to $5.5 billion, relative to the first quarter, where crack spreads were at a relatively normal level, whereas they are abnormally high today.</p><p>Free cash flow can be somewhat lumpy, due to non-cash impacts on profits and due to the timing of payments, both when it comes to those that XOM makes and those that XOM receives. There is thus no guarantee that Exxon Mobil&#39;s free cash flow on the refining business will grow by $5 billion as well, as does its net profit. But due to FCF already standing at $11 billion in Q1, and with large improvements for both the refining business and the production business, I believe that FCF will come in at $15 billion for Q2, at least. That would be up just $4 billion versus Q1, while refining profit alone will jump by more than that, thus $15 billion is likely a rather conservative estimate. But even that would mean $60 billion in annual free cash flow, and XOM would generate free cash worth 4.1% of its market capitalization during a single quarter. If XOM were to keep that up, its free cash flow yield would be north of 16%.</p><p>Exxon Mobil&#39;s dividend costs the company around $3.7 billion per quarter, Exxon Mobil would thus likely have surplus cash flows of at least $11 billion for the second quarter.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3441c513a67c5352f3c26ad42a57f120\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"417\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>Since Exxon Mobil has successfully cleaned up its balance sheet over the last two years, there is no large need to reduce debt further. The company has paid down 40% of its net debt over the last five quarters, and net debt now stands at just 0.4x this year&#39;s expected EBITDA. Deleveraging isn&#39;t really needed, but XOM may still want to pay down some debt. If they used $6 billion of their Q2 free cash flow for debt reduction, net debt would come down to a round $30 billion, or 0.3x this year&#39;s expected EBITDA. This would still leave $5 billion for buybacks for the quarter. Exxon Mobil could thus buy back around 1.5% of its float per quarter even while reducing net debt at a hefty pace ($24 billion annualized) and while continuing to pay a solid 4% dividend yield.</p><p>If XOM decides to forego further debt reduction, it could buy back 12% of its float on an annualized level (calculating with $11 billion in post-dividend FCF) while still paying its dividend and keeping net debt flat. In other words, XOM&#39;s shareholder return potential is immense with energy prices where they are today.</p><p>But even in a lower oil price scenario, which I don&#39;t see materializing in the near term, XOM would still generate very solid free cash flows. The company has guided towards the following cash flows in a $6ß Brent scenario:</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/22796a5bc594cc25b3edf58c9dd21f20\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"281\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>XOM presentation</span></p><p>Exxon Mobil sees operating cash flows of more than $300 billion through 2027 with Brent at just $60. Free cash flow would still total around $190 billion cumulatively, or a little less than $30 billion per year. In other words, even if Brent drops from more than $100 to just $60, which would be an immense drop considering how tight supply is, then XOM would still be able to finance its dividend without any problems while being able to buy back shares for many billion dollars -- $12 billion per year, roughly, if it keeps net debt flat.</p><p>Exxon Mobil trades at an enterprise value to EBITDA ratio of 4.2 right now, which is a very low valuation. The same holds true when we look at its free cash flow multiple, as shown above. XOM is thus attractively valued today, at least if one assumes that energy prices will remain high. I do believe that there is a high likelihood (although no guarantee) for that. In fact, some analysts believe that energy prices will continue to climb -- Goldman Sachs (GS) has famously called for$140 oil.</p><h3>Risks To Consider</h3><p>No investment is without risk, and that holds true for Exxon Mobil is well. It naturally is dependent on energy prices, and even though the current macro environment looks very favorable, there is no guarantee that this will remain the case. A new, hefty COVID wave that leads to new lockdowns could hurt global oil demand, for example.</p><p>Politics also is a risk. A windfall tax could eat into Exxon Mobil&#39;s profits. It would not make a lot of sense, as the world has not enough energy today, which is why governments should encourage production instead of making things tougher for energy companies. But still, a windfall tax is possible, and XOM could be negatively affected by such a measure.</p><h3>Takeaway</h3><p>The world is experiencing anenergy crisisright now. One can argue who is to blame for that, but it is pretty clear that XOM is one of the key beneficiaries. In this energy crisis, Exxon Mobil will generate enormous profits. Since the balance sheet is already pretty clean, there is a high likelihood that investors will receive hefty payouts over the coming quarters, as XOM has to put these billions of dollars of cash to use. The energy crisis is bad news for the world, but good news for XOM and its shareholders.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Exxon Mobil: Crisis Time?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nExxon Mobil: Crisis Time?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-07-23 08:52 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4525048-exxon-mobil-stock-energy-crisis-buy><strong>Seeking Alpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>SummaryThe world is experiencing a massive energy crisis. Markets are very tight for oil, natural gas, LNG, and refined products.XOM will thrive in this environment, as its profits and cash flow are ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4525048-exxon-mobil-stock-energy-crisis-buy\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"XOM":"埃克森美孚"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4525048-exxon-mobil-stock-energy-crisis-buy","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1177888616","content_text":"SummaryThe world is experiencing a massive energy crisis. Markets are very tight for oil, natural gas, LNG, and refined products.XOM will thrive in this environment, as its profits and cash flow are soaring.Investors can expect huge payouts, as XOM has to put its cash to use. The energy crisis is bad for the world but good for XOM and its owners.Article ThesisThe world is currently experiencing a major energy crisis. Exxon Mobil (NYSE:XOM), as one of the largest energy companies in the world, is well-positioned to benefit from that.Exxon Mobil will likely be immensely profitablethis year, and some believe that oil prices and natural gas prices will climb further during H2. But even if oil prices were to pull back, Exxon Mobil could remain a pretty profitable company that offers compelling shareholder return potential.The World's In An Energy CrisisFor many years, governments, NGOs, and even many companies have been talking about a shift towards renewable energy. Many companies even pushed themselves toward becoming greener. But the world's energy hunger continues to grow, and so far, renewables aren't able to supply the energy the world needs. There had been calls fordropping oil priceswith the purported reason for those falling prices being that a growing number of EVs will reduce global oil consumption. But at least so far, those predictions have not come true at all. In fact, oil demand around the globe continues to rise, as EV buying has not put any dent in the world's hunger for diesel, gasoline, etc.That is not too surprising. There are hundreds of millions of gas-powered cars in the world, and several dozen billion of new gas-powered cars are added every year. The fact that a much smaller number of EVs are also sold per year does not mean that the overall number of gas-powered cars is shrinking. Ships, machinery, trucks, airplanes, and so on also all need oil or oil-derived products, as there is no possibility to power those with electricity at scale.Add to that oil demand for other purposes, such as the production of plastics or the manufacturing of medicine, and the demand picture looks very strong. OPEC announced its demandestimatesfor 2022 and 2023 a couple of weeks ago. The cartel believes that global oil demand will rise by 3.4 million barrels per day, while another 2 million barrels per day of additional demand is expected for 2023. In total, this means that global oil demand will grow by 5 million barrels or even more from 2021 to 2023. This is, for reference, roughly half of Saudi Arabia's production in additional demand.I do believe that there is also a good chance that oil demand could continue to grow in 2024 and beyond. Billions of people in developing and emerging countries want to raise their standard of living. They want to purchase cars, travel, live in larger homes, and so on. Add to that resilient strong demand from industrial nations, despite their efforts to grow renewable energy output, and the global oil demand picture looks very healthy.At the same time, global demand for natural gas is also very strong. It is needed as a component for the chemicals industry, is used for cooking and heating (where demand is very resilient versus recessions), and it is increasingly used for electricity generation.BP Energy reviewIn the above chart, we see that global consumption of natural gas has risen drastically over the last two decades. Even consumption of coal has risen, and that is a much dirtier fuel, both when it comes to CO2 emissions as well as when it comes to other emissions, such as NOX and particulates. From an ESG and public health perspective, it makes a lot more sense to use natural gas than coal. It thus seems reasonable to assume that coal will be the first energy source to be phased out. Replacing it with natural gas as a weather-and daytime-independent energy source (unlike wind and solar) would make sense, and would be highly beneficial for global natural gas demand.The demand picture for both oil and gas is thus very healthy. And yet, supply is constrained. Energy companies have underinvested for years, starting in 2014, when oil prices first started to drop. A growing focus on free cash generation has led to less growth investment. Add unaccommodating policies and growing regulation from different governments around the world, pressure from ESG-friendly investors, and insufficient offtake capacity (pipelines not being allowed), and energy companies had a lot of reasons not to invest heavily into new production.So demand is strong and continues to grow, and at the same time, supply is constrained, as the world has tried to move away from fossil fuels too fast. The result is an environment where markets are very tight and where inventories decline, which leads to high energy prices. This is especially true when it comes to natural gas in Europe, where supply disruptions due to the Russia-Ukraine war add even more upwards pressure on prices.XOM: An Energy Giant That Should BenefitWhen markets are tight and prices are high, producers/suppliers of the in-demand goods naturally benefit. Exxon Mobil is the largest supermajor in the world in terms of production and market capitalization, and it should be one of the biggest beneficiaries of the current situation. It did, for the record, not cause this situation. In fact, it had been withstanding different forces (Engine No. 1, NY AG, etc.) that wanted to force it to produce less oil and gas -- if those had succeeded, the energy crisis would be even larger, as global supply would be even lower.Exxon Mobil generated free cash flows of $11 billion during the first quarter, but the second quarter most likely was way stronger.From the beginning of the first quarter to the end of the second quarter, both WTI oil and US natural gas rose by around 50%. That naturally benefits Exxon Mobil's profits. On top of that, Exxon Mobil's profits rose due to an increase in American crack spreads, which makes its refining business more profitable, all else equal. As a result, Exxon Mobil hasstatedthat its refining profit in Q2 could rise by up to $5.5 billion, relative to the first quarter, where crack spreads were at a relatively normal level, whereas they are abnormally high today.Free cash flow can be somewhat lumpy, due to non-cash impacts on profits and due to the timing of payments, both when it comes to those that XOM makes and those that XOM receives. There is thus no guarantee that Exxon Mobil's free cash flow on the refining business will grow by $5 billion as well, as does its net profit. But due to FCF already standing at $11 billion in Q1, and with large improvements for both the refining business and the production business, I believe that FCF will come in at $15 billion for Q2, at least. That would be up just $4 billion versus Q1, while refining profit alone will jump by more than that, thus $15 billion is likely a rather conservative estimate. But even that would mean $60 billion in annual free cash flow, and XOM would generate free cash worth 4.1% of its market capitalization during a single quarter. If XOM were to keep that up, its free cash flow yield would be north of 16%.Exxon Mobil's dividend costs the company around $3.7 billion per quarter, Exxon Mobil would thus likely have surplus cash flows of at least $11 billion for the second quarter.Since Exxon Mobil has successfully cleaned up its balance sheet over the last two years, there is no large need to reduce debt further. The company has paid down 40% of its net debt over the last five quarters, and net debt now stands at just 0.4x this year's expected EBITDA. Deleveraging isn't really needed, but XOM may still want to pay down some debt. If they used $6 billion of their Q2 free cash flow for debt reduction, net debt would come down to a round $30 billion, or 0.3x this year's expected EBITDA. This would still leave $5 billion for buybacks for the quarter. Exxon Mobil could thus buy back around 1.5% of its float per quarter even while reducing net debt at a hefty pace ($24 billion annualized) and while continuing to pay a solid 4% dividend yield.If XOM decides to forego further debt reduction, it could buy back 12% of its float on an annualized level (calculating with $11 billion in post-dividend FCF) while still paying its dividend and keeping net debt flat. In other words, XOM's shareholder return potential is immense with energy prices where they are today.But even in a lower oil price scenario, which I don't see materializing in the near term, XOM would still generate very solid free cash flows. The company has guided towards the following cash flows in a $6ß Brent scenario:XOM presentationExxon Mobil sees operating cash flows of more than $300 billion through 2027 with Brent at just $60. Free cash flow would still total around $190 billion cumulatively, or a little less than $30 billion per year. In other words, even if Brent drops from more than $100 to just $60, which would be an immense drop considering how tight supply is, then XOM would still be able to finance its dividend without any problems while being able to buy back shares for many billion dollars -- $12 billion per year, roughly, if it keeps net debt flat.Exxon Mobil trades at an enterprise value to EBITDA ratio of 4.2 right now, which is a very low valuation. The same holds true when we look at its free cash flow multiple, as shown above. XOM is thus attractively valued today, at least if one assumes that energy prices will remain high. I do believe that there is a high likelihood (although no guarantee) for that. In fact, some analysts believe that energy prices will continue to climb -- Goldman Sachs (GS) has famously called for$140 oil.Risks To ConsiderNo investment is without risk, and that holds true for Exxon Mobil is well. It naturally is dependent on energy prices, and even though the current macro environment looks very favorable, there is no guarantee that this will remain the case. A new, hefty COVID wave that leads to new lockdowns could hurt global oil demand, for example.Politics also is a risk. A windfall tax could eat into Exxon Mobil's profits. It would not make a lot of sense, as the world has not enough energy today, which is why governments should encourage production instead of making things tougher for energy companies. But still, a windfall tax is possible, and XOM could be negatively affected by such a measure.TakeawayThe world is experiencing anenergy crisisright now. One can argue who is to blame for that, but it is pretty clear that XOM is one of the key beneficiaries. In this energy crisis, Exxon Mobil will generate enormous profits. Since the balance sheet is already pretty clean, there is a high likelihood that investors will receive hefty payouts over the coming quarters, as XOM has to put these billions of dollars of cash to use. The energy crisis is bad news for the world, but good news for XOM and its shareholders.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1402,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9077110185,"gmtCreate":1658465634947,"gmtModify":1676536164061,"author":{"id":"3572939161983827","authorId":"3572939161983827","name":"RicPuah","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f228739d2dbb241334ac0736565c39f6","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3572939161983827","idStr":"3572939161983827"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like pls","listText":"Like pls","text":"Like pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9077110185","repostId":"1118531776","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1000,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9074687552,"gmtCreate":1658359258077,"gmtModify":1676536144780,"author":{"id":"3572939161983827","authorId":"3572939161983827","name":"RicPuah","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f228739d2dbb241334ac0736565c39f6","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3572939161983827","idStr":"3572939161983827"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like pls","listText":"Like pls","text":"Like pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9074687552","repostId":"1110784633","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":272,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9074923626,"gmtCreate":1658284157665,"gmtModify":1676536134880,"author":{"id":"3572939161983827","authorId":"3572939161983827","name":"RicPuah","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f228739d2dbb241334ac0736565c39f6","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3572939161983827","idStr":"3572939161983827"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like pls","listText":"Like pls","text":"Like pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":9,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9074923626","repostId":"2252227548","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":298,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9075895973,"gmtCreate":1658185097792,"gmtModify":1676536116547,"author":{"id":"3572939161983827","authorId":"3572939161983827","name":"RicPuah","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f228739d2dbb241334ac0736565c39f6","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3572939161983827","idStr":"3572939161983827"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like pls","listText":"Like pls","text":"Like pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9075895973","repostId":"1183726040","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":493,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9072700453,"gmtCreate":1658100766572,"gmtModify":1676536103797,"author":{"id":"3572939161983827","authorId":"3572939161983827","name":"RicPuah","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f228739d2dbb241334ac0736565c39f6","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3572939161983827","idStr":"3572939161983827"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like pls","listText":"Like pls","text":"Like pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9072700453","repostId":"2251841965","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2251841965","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1658022733,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2251841965?lang=&edition=full_marsco","pubTime":"2022-07-17 09:52","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Is the New Netflix-Microsoft Partnership a Massive Mistake?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2251841965","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Microsoft will power Netflix's ads, but the competition will be stiff.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>Microsoft</b> (MSFT 1.04%) has signed a deal with <b>Netflix</b> (NFLX 8.20%) to provide the technology and sales expertise that will underpin the streamer&#39;s upcoming ad-supported tier. For Netflix, working with one of the biggest tech firms in the world on one of its most important projects in recent years is somewhat of a boon. And for Microsoft, overseeing the nascent ad product for the most popular streaming service on the planet only serves to boost its suite of marketing services.</p><p>Still, for both companies, the risks of failure can&#39;t be overstated. Netflix has positioned a lower-cost ad-supported offering as a strategy to combat falling subscriber numbers. Meanwhile, Microsoft no longer operates a streaming platform upon which to sell video ads (R.I.P. Mixer). Fundamentally, this is an enormous opportunity for the two companies, but there&#39;s a chance they both might have bitten off more than they can chew.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cbf031077a10148043ed57861a913572\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"467\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>Image source: Getty Images.</p><h2>Why not Google or Meta?</h2><p>When talking about advertising in the internet age, <b>Alphabet</b>&#39;s Google and <b>Meta</b> are always part of the conversation. Google generated almost $210 billion from ads last year, while Meta pulled in close to $115 billion. By contrast, Microsoft drew just $10 billion in ad revenue in 2021.</p><p>Of course, Microsoft has never presented itself as an advertising-driven operation -- it&#39;s always been a software and services business. Conversely, Google and Meta built their fortunes by creating successful ad platforms, and their successes have been borne out by the fact that marketers want to use their tools.</p><p>Needless to say, as video has become a major part of the modern web experience, Google and Meta have been there to exploit the advertising opportunities: Google&#39;s YouTube serves 1 billion hours of content each day, while Meta&#39;s Instagram Reels can reach as many as 675.3 million users each month. With those achievements in mind, why didn&#39;t Netflix choose to partner with Google or Meta?</p><h2>The need for control</h2><p>Neither Microsoft nor Netflix have provided specifics about the tie-up, so it&#39;s unwise to speculate whether there were any financial incentives or other favorable terms that helped seal the deal. However, in Netflix&#39;s press release discussing the arrangement, there may be a clue: Netflix wants control.</p><p>&#34;Microsoft has the proven ability to support all our advertising needs as we work together to build a new ad-supported offering,&#34; Netflix stated. &#34;More importantly, Microsoft offered the flexibility to innovate over time on both the technology and sales side, as well as strong privacy protections for our members.&#34;</p><p>Reading between the lines, Netflix seems to suggest it doesn&#39;t yet know how advertising will work on its platform -- if at all. By working with the seventh-most-popular global ad network, it will almost certainly have more say over the frequency and quality of the ads it offers. It&#39;s also possible Microsoft could give them more performance insight than they might get from bigger players. Plus, privacy protections are a bonus because Google and Meta both have muddy histories on that front.</p><h2>Are the trade-offs worth it?</h2><p>Despite all the reasons for Netflix opting to work with Microsoft, there are a host of reasons it could ultimately prove to be a misstep. Notably, it&#39;s not just the money Microsoft has (or has not) previously generated in the ad-network space that matters, it&#39;s also the relationships associated with that revenue. It&#39;s almost inevitable that the larger the ad network, the more connections it has with marketers.</p><p>For Netflix -- a company that&#39;s literally creating a whole new pricing tier subsidized by advertisers -- access to the biggest available pool of marketers will be important. That need will be even greater when you consider the user experience -- subscribers will quickly become irritated if they&#39;re shown the same carousel of ads over and again while binging <i>Stranger Thing</i>s. Does Microsoft have a deep-enough pool of connections to really satisfy Netflix&#39;s needs?</p><p>As things stand, many details of Netflix&#39;s ad-supported plan are still vague, so it&#39;s possible a lot of these concerns may be addressed in the company&#39;s upcoming Q2 earnings call. Investors should see what Netflix says about how its ad-based tier will operate, as well as any details about how long they&#39;re tied to Microsoft. After all, if the streamer wants &#34;flexibility,&#34; part of that idea might be eventually moving to an ad network that has more stature in the advertising industry.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Is the New Netflix-Microsoft Partnership a Massive Mistake?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nIs the New Netflix-Microsoft Partnership a Massive Mistake?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-07-17 09:52 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/07/16/is-the-new-netflix-microsoft-partnership-a-mistake/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Microsoft (MSFT 1.04%) has signed a deal with Netflix (NFLX 8.20%) to provide the technology and sales expertise that will underpin the streamer's upcoming ad-supported tier. For Netflix, working with...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/07/16/is-the-new-netflix-microsoft-partnership-a-mistake/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"QNETCN":"纳斯达克中美互联网老虎指数","BK4528":"SaaS概念","BK4516":"特朗普概念","BK4554":"元宇宙及AR概念","BK4532":"文艺复兴科技持仓","MSFT":"微软","BK4570":"地缘局势概念股","BK4567":"ESG概念","BK4108":"电影和娱乐","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","BK4507":"流媒体概念","NFLX":"奈飞","BK4576":"AR","BK4533":"AQR资本管理(全球第二大对冲基金)","BK4525":"远程办公概念","BK4566":"资本集团","BK4524":"宅经济概念","BK4535":"淡马锡持仓","BK4577":"网络游戏","BK4527":"明星科技股","BK4538":"云计算","BK4579":"人工智能","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓","BK4503":"景林资产持仓","BK4551":"寇图资本持仓","BK4097":"系统软件","BK4581":"高盛持仓","BK4504":"桥水持仓","NGD":"New Gold","BK4548":"巴美列捷福持仓","BK4017":"黄金"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/07/16/is-the-new-netflix-microsoft-partnership-a-mistake/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2251841965","content_text":"Microsoft (MSFT 1.04%) has signed a deal with Netflix (NFLX 8.20%) to provide the technology and sales expertise that will underpin the streamer's upcoming ad-supported tier. For Netflix, working with one of the biggest tech firms in the world on one of its most important projects in recent years is somewhat of a boon. And for Microsoft, overseeing the nascent ad product for the most popular streaming service on the planet only serves to boost its suite of marketing services.Still, for both companies, the risks of failure can't be overstated. Netflix has positioned a lower-cost ad-supported offering as a strategy to combat falling subscriber numbers. Meanwhile, Microsoft no longer operates a streaming platform upon which to sell video ads (R.I.P. Mixer). Fundamentally, this is an enormous opportunity for the two companies, but there's a chance they both might have bitten off more than they can chew.Image source: Getty Images.Why not Google or Meta?When talking about advertising in the internet age, Alphabet's Google and Meta are always part of the conversation. Google generated almost $210 billion from ads last year, while Meta pulled in close to $115 billion. By contrast, Microsoft drew just $10 billion in ad revenue in 2021.Of course, Microsoft has never presented itself as an advertising-driven operation -- it's always been a software and services business. Conversely, Google and Meta built their fortunes by creating successful ad platforms, and their successes have been borne out by the fact that marketers want to use their tools.Needless to say, as video has become a major part of the modern web experience, Google and Meta have been there to exploit the advertising opportunities: Google's YouTube serves 1 billion hours of content each day, while Meta's Instagram Reels can reach as many as 675.3 million users each month. With those achievements in mind, why didn't Netflix choose to partner with Google or Meta?The need for controlNeither Microsoft nor Netflix have provided specifics about the tie-up, so it's unwise to speculate whether there were any financial incentives or other favorable terms that helped seal the deal. However, in Netflix's press release discussing the arrangement, there may be a clue: Netflix wants control.\"Microsoft has the proven ability to support all our advertising needs as we work together to build a new ad-supported offering,\" Netflix stated. \"More importantly, Microsoft offered the flexibility to innovate over time on both the technology and sales side, as well as strong privacy protections for our members.\"Reading between the lines, Netflix seems to suggest it doesn't yet know how advertising will work on its platform -- if at all. By working with the seventh-most-popular global ad network, it will almost certainly have more say over the frequency and quality of the ads it offers. It's also possible Microsoft could give them more performance insight than they might get from bigger players. Plus, privacy protections are a bonus because Google and Meta both have muddy histories on that front.Are the trade-offs worth it?Despite all the reasons for Netflix opting to work with Microsoft, there are a host of reasons it could ultimately prove to be a misstep. Notably, it's not just the money Microsoft has (or has not) previously generated in the ad-network space that matters, it's also the relationships associated with that revenue. It's almost inevitable that the larger the ad network, the more connections it has with marketers.For Netflix -- a company that's literally creating a whole new pricing tier subsidized by advertisers -- access to the biggest available pool of marketers will be important. That need will be even greater when you consider the user experience -- subscribers will quickly become irritated if they're shown the same carousel of ads over and again while binging Stranger Things. Does Microsoft have a deep-enough pool of connections to really satisfy Netflix's needs?As things stand, many details of Netflix's ad-supported plan are still vague, so it's possible a lot of these concerns may be addressed in the company's upcoming Q2 earnings call. Investors should see what Netflix says about how its ad-based tier will operate, as well as any details about how long they're tied to Microsoft. After all, if the streamer wants \"flexibility,\" part of that idea might be eventually moving to an ad network that has more stature in the advertising industry.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":434,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9072608794,"gmtCreate":1658022201818,"gmtModify":1676536094282,"author":{"id":"3572939161983827","authorId":"3572939161983827","name":"RicPuah","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f228739d2dbb241334ac0736565c39f6","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3572939161983827","idStr":"3572939161983827"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like pls","listText":"Like pls","text":"Like pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9072608794","repostId":"2249540083","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2249540083","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1658021139,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2249540083?lang=&edition=full_marsco","pubTime":"2022-07-17 09:25","market":"uk","language":"en","title":"Tycoon Whose Bet Broke the Nickel Market Walks Away a Billionaire","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2249540083","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"SINGAPORE (BLOOMBERG) --By 2.08pm Shanghai time on March 8, it was clear that Xiang Guangda's giant ","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>SINGAPORE (BLOOMBERG) --By 2.08pm Shanghai time on March 8, it was clear that Xiang Guangda&#39;s giant bet on a fall in nickel prices was going spectacularly wrong.</p><p>Futures had just skyrocketed above US$100,000 a ton and his trade was more than US$10 billion underwater. It was threatening not only to bankrupt Mr Xiang&#39;s company, but to trigger a Lehman Brothers-like shock through the entire metals industry and possibly topple the London Metal Exchange (LME) itself.</p><p>But Mr Xiang was calm. Within hours, more than 50 bankers had arrived at his office wanting to hear how he planned to respond to the crisis. He told them simply: &#34;I&#39;m confident that we will overcome this.&#34;</p><p>And he did.</p><p>Four months on, the nickel price is falling, as Mr Xiang had predicted. The coterie of banks led by JPMorgan Chase &amp; Co that were baying for his blood has been repaid. He has closed out nearly all his short position in nickel, making a loss on the trade of about US$1 billion - a manageable sum given the profits being generated elsewhere in his business empire, say people who know him.</p><p>Crucially: the man nicknamed &#39;Big Shot&#39; in Chinese commodities circles is poised to walk away from the fiasco with his multibillion-dollar mining and steelmaking company, Tsingshan Holding Group, intact and even expanding.</p><p>But while Mr Xiang moves on, others are left dealing with the destruction wrought by the crisis. His miraculous escape was thanks in no small part to the actions of the LME, which controversially intervened to prevent prices from rising and then suspended trading until Mr Xiang had struck a deal with his banks.</p><p>Those on the other side of the trade, who lost billions, were furious. Months later, the LME is dealing with a raft of investigations and lawsuits, and the nickel market is still reeling.</p><p>&#34;Nice to see that @jpmorgan and The Big Shot got out of this whole thing with only scratches,&#34; Cliff Asness, founder of AQR Capital Management, said last week in a tweet thick with sarcasm. &#34;It&#39;s just heart warming.&#34;</p><p>This account of how Mr Xiang extricated himself from a short squeeze that rocked the global metals markets is based on numerous interviews with people who were involved, all of whom requested anonymity. Multiple attempts to seek comment from Tsingshan were unsuccessful.</p><h2>Massive short squeeze</h2><p>Mr Xiang had built up his massive short position in late 2021 and early 2022 partly as a hedge, partly as a bet that a planned jump in Tsingshan&#39;s production this year would drag down prices. But when Russia&#39;s invasion of Ukraine jolted global markets, nickel started climbing - gradually at first, before rocketing 250 per cent in an epic squeeze.</p><p>On the evening of March 8, senior bankers crowded into a room at Tsingshan&#39;s headquarters demanding answers. Others dialed in for video calls from London or Singapore. Of those present, some didn&#39;t leave until early the next morning.</p><p>More On This TopicXiang Guangda, the metals &#39;visionary&#39; who brought nickel market to a standstillNickel trading halted after unprecedented 250% spike amid Russia supply fears</p><p>The crowd that night was so large because Mr Xiang&#39;s position was spread across about 10 banks and brokers - he had been a good client for many of them, including JPMorgan, for years. But after nickel started spiking on March 7, Tsingshan struggled to meet its margin calls. Now he owed each of them hundreds of millions of dollars.</p><p>The LME had eventually intervened to halt trading a couple of hours after nickel hit US$100,000. It also canceled billions of dollars of transactions, bringing the price back to US$48,078, where it closed the previous day, in what amounted to a lifeline for Mr Xiang and Tsingshan.</p><p>To reopen the market, the LME proposed a solution: Mr Xiang should strike a deal with holders of long positions to close out his trade. But a price of around US$50,000 would be more than twice the level at which he had entered his short position, and would mean accepting billions of dollars in losses.</p><p>Mr Xiang, who is in his early 60s, stood firm. From a start making frames for car doors and windows in Wenzhou, eastern China, he&#39;d built Tsingshan into the world&#39;s largest nickel and stainless steel producer, with an empire stretching from mines in remote Indonesian islands to steel mills on China&#39;s east coast. Along the way, he&#39;d acquired a reputation for visionary thinking and a taste for betting big.</p><p>The spike in prices and the trading freeze caused havoc for companies that use nickel, like stainless steel mills and makers of batteries for electric vehicles. Some simply stopped taking new orders. On the LME, dealers were left frantically trying to recoup missed margin calls from clients who couldn&#39;t pay, and at least one had to seek financial support from its parent company.</p><p>Yet with unprecedented chaos rippling through the industry, Mr Xiang - still facing his bankers in the early hours of March 9 - had a key advantage. They were more terrified than he was.</p><p>If he refused to pay, they would have to chase him in courts in Indonesia and China. What&#39;s more, he had executed his nickel trade through a variety of corporate entities - such as the Hong Kong branch of battery unit Ruipu Energy - and it wasn&#39;t clear the banks would even have the right to seize Tsingshan&#39;s most valuable assets.</p><p>JPMorgan, which had the biggest exposure, took the lead. The group included some international players like Standard Chartered Bank and BNP Paribas, but many were Chinese and Singaporean banks that had little experience handling a situation like this.</p><h2>Personal guarantee</h2><p>Mr Xiang told the assembled bankers he had no intention of closing the position anywhere near US$50,000. A few hours later he was delivering the same message to Matthew Chamberlain, chief executive of the LME. Tsingshan was a strong company, he said, and it had the support of the Chinese government. There would be no backing down.</p><p>Instead, he wrote a list of the assets he was willing to put up as collateral: a string of ferronickel plants in Indonesia. But for some of the bankers, that wasn&#39;t enough. They wouldn&#39;t be able to do any due diligence on the Indonesian assets for weeks or months, and even those who worked closely with Tsingshan hadn&#39;t seen the facilities for years because of the pandemic.</p><p>So Mr Xiang made a further concession that was both valuable and, in Chinese business culture, humbling: a personal guarantee. If Tsingshan didn&#39;t pay its debts, the bankers could turf him out of his home. That was what he was willing to offer. Take it or leave it.</p><p>More On This TopicMetal traders reel as nickel chaos recalls market&#39;s darkest daysLondon Metal Exchange CEO calls for more powers to intervene as nickel trading halt continues</p><p>It wasn&#39;t much of a choice. On March 14, a week after the chaos that engulfed the nickel market, Tsingshan announced a deal with its banks under which they agreed not to pursue the company for the billions it owed for a period of time. In exchange, Mr Xiang agreed a series of price levels at which he would reduce his nickel position once prices dropped below about US$30,000.</p><p>When the market reopened two days later, prices moved lower, easing the strain on Mr Xiang and the banks. A brief dip below US$30,000 allowed Tsingshan to cover about 20 per cent of its short position.</p><p>The pressure on the LME was only intensifying, however. The exchange&#39;s regulators launched reviews of its governance and oversight and many hedge funds were still furious at the LME&#39;s decision to cancel trades.Open interest across the exchange&#39;s six main metals slid to the lowest in more than a decade as traders headed for the exit.</p><p>Each month, Tsingshan and its banks reviewed their standstill agreement. After the initial dip, nickel spent long stretches in limbo with prices hovering around US$33,000.</p><p>It was a nervous time. Tsingshan still had a vast short position, meaning it and its banks could still be exposed to large losses if prices started rising again - for example, if sanctions against Russia led to an actual disruption in nickel supplies, which so far they hadn&#39;t.</p><p>Finally, in May, prices tumbled decisively below the key US$30,000 level after China&#39;s lockdowns dented metals market sentiment. Over the following weeks, Tsingshan reduced its position - which in early March had been over 150,000 tons - to just 60,000 tons.</p><p>By this point, prices were below the level at which Tsingshan had stopped being able to pay its margin calls in early March, which meant Mr Xiang no longer owed the banks any money.</p><p>By the end of June Mr Xiang had exited his position entirely with JPMorgan and several other banks, leaving him with a remaining short of less than 20,000 tons.</p><p>People familiar with the matter estimate Tsingshan&#39;s losses on the trade at around US$1 billion. Mr Xiang isn&#39;t concerned. The loss has been roughly offset by the profits of his nickel operations over the same period. The standstill agreement, which Mr Xiang extended from the initial three months, is set to expire in mid-July.</p><p>Now &#39;Big Shot&#39; is moving on with his life, focusing on plans for the future at Tsingshan, which had revenues of US$56 billion last year. His ability to trade on the LME may be reduced, for now at least, but he is still able to trade on the Shanghai Futures Exchange. He has ambitions to expand, not only in Asia, but also to Africa. And Tsingshan is as powerful as ever in the nickel market: a massive increase in production from his plants in Indonesia is one of the key factors driving prices lower, much as Mr Xiang predicted.</p><p>But while Mr Xiang may be moving on, the LME is still dealing with the fallout. Regulators have pointed to the chaos in nickel as a sign of the risks lurking in commodity markets, and called for greater oversight of the entire sector. Hedge fund Elliot Investment Management and trading firm Jane Street have launched legal action against the LME, seeking nearly US$500 million.</p><p>And the nickel market is still broken, say people involved in it, with both open interest and trading volumes stuck at sharply lower levels as traders step away from using LME prices in their contracts. Jim Lennon, a veteran nickel market-watcher and managing director of Red Door Research, estimates that less than 25 per cent of global nickel output is now being sold on the basis of LME prices, down from 50 per cent before the crisis in March.</p><p>&#34;A lot of the industry now has temporarily disengaged from the LME,&#34; he says. &#34;The market is still functioning, but it&#39;s struggling.&#34;</p></body></html>","source":"lsy1584095487587","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Tycoon Whose Bet Broke the Nickel Market Walks Away a Billionaire</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTycoon Whose Bet Broke the Nickel Market Walks Away a Billionaire\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-07-17 09:25 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.straitstimes.com/business/companies-markets/tycoon-whose-bet-broke-the-nickel-market-walks-away-a-billionaire><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>SINGAPORE (BLOOMBERG) --By 2.08pm Shanghai time on March 8, it was clear that Xiang Guangda's giant bet on a fall in nickel prices was going spectacularly wrong.Futures had just skyrocketed above US$...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.straitstimes.com/business/companies-markets/tycoon-whose-bet-broke-the-nickel-market-walks-away-a-billionaire\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NICK.UK":"镍ETF","NIC.AU":"Nickel Industries Ltd","JJN":"镍ETN-iPath"},"source_url":"https://www.straitstimes.com/business/companies-markets/tycoon-whose-bet-broke-the-nickel-market-walks-away-a-billionaire","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2249540083","content_text":"SINGAPORE (BLOOMBERG) --By 2.08pm Shanghai time on March 8, it was clear that Xiang Guangda's giant bet on a fall in nickel prices was going spectacularly wrong.Futures had just skyrocketed above US$100,000 a ton and his trade was more than US$10 billion underwater. It was threatening not only to bankrupt Mr Xiang's company, but to trigger a Lehman Brothers-like shock through the entire metals industry and possibly topple the London Metal Exchange (LME) itself.But Mr Xiang was calm. Within hours, more than 50 bankers had arrived at his office wanting to hear how he planned to respond to the crisis. He told them simply: \"I'm confident that we will overcome this.\"And he did.Four months on, the nickel price is falling, as Mr Xiang had predicted. The coterie of banks led by JPMorgan Chase & Co that were baying for his blood has been repaid. He has closed out nearly all his short position in nickel, making a loss on the trade of about US$1 billion - a manageable sum given the profits being generated elsewhere in his business empire, say people who know him.Crucially: the man nicknamed 'Big Shot' in Chinese commodities circles is poised to walk away from the fiasco with his multibillion-dollar mining and steelmaking company, Tsingshan Holding Group, intact and even expanding.But while Mr Xiang moves on, others are left dealing with the destruction wrought by the crisis. His miraculous escape was thanks in no small part to the actions of the LME, which controversially intervened to prevent prices from rising and then suspended trading until Mr Xiang had struck a deal with his banks.Those on the other side of the trade, who lost billions, were furious. Months later, the LME is dealing with a raft of investigations and lawsuits, and the nickel market is still reeling.\"Nice to see that @jpmorgan and The Big Shot got out of this whole thing with only scratches,\" Cliff Asness, founder of AQR Capital Management, said last week in a tweet thick with sarcasm. \"It's just heart warming.\"This account of how Mr Xiang extricated himself from a short squeeze that rocked the global metals markets is based on numerous interviews with people who were involved, all of whom requested anonymity. Multiple attempts to seek comment from Tsingshan were unsuccessful.Massive short squeezeMr Xiang had built up his massive short position in late 2021 and early 2022 partly as a hedge, partly as a bet that a planned jump in Tsingshan's production this year would drag down prices. But when Russia's invasion of Ukraine jolted global markets, nickel started climbing - gradually at first, before rocketing 250 per cent in an epic squeeze.On the evening of March 8, senior bankers crowded into a room at Tsingshan's headquarters demanding answers. Others dialed in for video calls from London or Singapore. Of those present, some didn't leave until early the next morning.More On This TopicXiang Guangda, the metals 'visionary' who brought nickel market to a standstillNickel trading halted after unprecedented 250% spike amid Russia supply fearsThe crowd that night was so large because Mr Xiang's position was spread across about 10 banks and brokers - he had been a good client for many of them, including JPMorgan, for years. But after nickel started spiking on March 7, Tsingshan struggled to meet its margin calls. Now he owed each of them hundreds of millions of dollars.The LME had eventually intervened to halt trading a couple of hours after nickel hit US$100,000. It also canceled billions of dollars of transactions, bringing the price back to US$48,078, where it closed the previous day, in what amounted to a lifeline for Mr Xiang and Tsingshan.To reopen the market, the LME proposed a solution: Mr Xiang should strike a deal with holders of long positions to close out his trade. But a price of around US$50,000 would be more than twice the level at which he had entered his short position, and would mean accepting billions of dollars in losses.Mr Xiang, who is in his early 60s, stood firm. From a start making frames for car doors and windows in Wenzhou, eastern China, he'd built Tsingshan into the world's largest nickel and stainless steel producer, with an empire stretching from mines in remote Indonesian islands to steel mills on China's east coast. Along the way, he'd acquired a reputation for visionary thinking and a taste for betting big.The spike in prices and the trading freeze caused havoc for companies that use nickel, like stainless steel mills and makers of batteries for electric vehicles. Some simply stopped taking new orders. On the LME, dealers were left frantically trying to recoup missed margin calls from clients who couldn't pay, and at least one had to seek financial support from its parent company.Yet with unprecedented chaos rippling through the industry, Mr Xiang - still facing his bankers in the early hours of March 9 - had a key advantage. They were more terrified than he was.If he refused to pay, they would have to chase him in courts in Indonesia and China. What's more, he had executed his nickel trade through a variety of corporate entities - such as the Hong Kong branch of battery unit Ruipu Energy - and it wasn't clear the banks would even have the right to seize Tsingshan's most valuable assets.JPMorgan, which had the biggest exposure, took the lead. The group included some international players like Standard Chartered Bank and BNP Paribas, but many were Chinese and Singaporean banks that had little experience handling a situation like this.Personal guaranteeMr Xiang told the assembled bankers he had no intention of closing the position anywhere near US$50,000. A few hours later he was delivering the same message to Matthew Chamberlain, chief executive of the LME. Tsingshan was a strong company, he said, and it had the support of the Chinese government. There would be no backing down.Instead, he wrote a list of the assets he was willing to put up as collateral: a string of ferronickel plants in Indonesia. But for some of the bankers, that wasn't enough. They wouldn't be able to do any due diligence on the Indonesian assets for weeks or months, and even those who worked closely with Tsingshan hadn't seen the facilities for years because of the pandemic.So Mr Xiang made a further concession that was both valuable and, in Chinese business culture, humbling: a personal guarantee. If Tsingshan didn't pay its debts, the bankers could turf him out of his home. That was what he was willing to offer. Take it or leave it.More On This TopicMetal traders reel as nickel chaos recalls market's darkest daysLondon Metal Exchange CEO calls for more powers to intervene as nickel trading halt continuesIt wasn't much of a choice. On March 14, a week after the chaos that engulfed the nickel market, Tsingshan announced a deal with its banks under which they agreed not to pursue the company for the billions it owed for a period of time. In exchange, Mr Xiang agreed a series of price levels at which he would reduce his nickel position once prices dropped below about US$30,000.When the market reopened two days later, prices moved lower, easing the strain on Mr Xiang and the banks. A brief dip below US$30,000 allowed Tsingshan to cover about 20 per cent of its short position.The pressure on the LME was only intensifying, however. The exchange's regulators launched reviews of its governance and oversight and many hedge funds were still furious at the LME's decision to cancel trades.Open interest across the exchange's six main metals slid to the lowest in more than a decade as traders headed for the exit.Each month, Tsingshan and its banks reviewed their standstill agreement. After the initial dip, nickel spent long stretches in limbo with prices hovering around US$33,000.It was a nervous time. Tsingshan still had a vast short position, meaning it and its banks could still be exposed to large losses if prices started rising again - for example, if sanctions against Russia led to an actual disruption in nickel supplies, which so far they hadn't.Finally, in May, prices tumbled decisively below the key US$30,000 level after China's lockdowns dented metals market sentiment. Over the following weeks, Tsingshan reduced its position - which in early March had been over 150,000 tons - to just 60,000 tons.By this point, prices were below the level at which Tsingshan had stopped being able to pay its margin calls in early March, which meant Mr Xiang no longer owed the banks any money.By the end of June Mr Xiang had exited his position entirely with JPMorgan and several other banks, leaving him with a remaining short of less than 20,000 tons.People familiar with the matter estimate Tsingshan's losses on the trade at around US$1 billion. Mr Xiang isn't concerned. The loss has been roughly offset by the profits of his nickel operations over the same period. The standstill agreement, which Mr Xiang extended from the initial three months, is set to expire in mid-July.Now 'Big Shot' is moving on with his life, focusing on plans for the future at Tsingshan, which had revenues of US$56 billion last year. His ability to trade on the LME may be reduced, for now at least, but he is still able to trade on the Shanghai Futures Exchange. He has ambitions to expand, not only in Asia, but also to Africa. And Tsingshan is as powerful as ever in the nickel market: a massive increase in production from his plants in Indonesia is one of the key factors driving prices lower, much as Mr Xiang predicted.But while Mr Xiang may be moving on, the LME is still dealing with the fallout. Regulators have pointed to the chaos in nickel as a sign of the risks lurking in commodity markets, and called for greater oversight of the entire sector. Hedge fund Elliot Investment Management and trading firm Jane Street have launched legal action against the LME, seeking nearly US$500 million.And the nickel market is still broken, say people involved in it, with both open interest and trading volumes stuck at sharply lower levels as traders step away from using LME prices in their contracts. Jim Lennon, a veteran nickel market-watcher and managing director of Red Door Research, estimates that less than 25 per cent of global nickel output is now being sold on the basis of LME prices, down from 50 per cent before the crisis in March.\"A lot of the industry now has temporarily disengaged from the LME,\" he says. \"The market is still functioning, but it's struggling.\"","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":290,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9072100147,"gmtCreate":1657972658489,"gmtModify":1676536089496,"author":{"id":"3572939161983827","authorId":"3572939161983827","name":"RicPuah","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f228739d2dbb241334ac0736565c39f6","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3572939161983827","idStr":"3572939161983827"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like pls","listText":"Like pls","text":"Like pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9072100147","repostId":"1144090895","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1144090895","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1657936858,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1144090895?lang=&edition=full_marsco","pubTime":"2022-07-16 10:00","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Bearish ETF Strategies for a Pessimistic Outlook","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1144090895","media":"VettaFi","summary":"After a punishing first half of the year for the stock markets, traders continued to ramp up bets ag","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>After a punishing first half of the year for the stock markets, traders continued to ramp up bets against equities. Exchange traded fund investors can also hedge against further market risks with bearish or inverse strategies.</p><p>According to JPMorgan Chase &amp; Co.’s analysis of futures tracking major stock indexes, asset managers and hedge funds raised bets against U.S. stocks to the highest level since 2016 on fears over a global slowdown, theWall Street Journalreported.</p><p>Additionally, according to a survey by the National Association of Active Investment Managers, the average active investor pared back stock exposure this year and reduced equity allocations to the lowest levels since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p>“Everybody’s focused on recession risk,” Parag Thatte, a strategist at Deutsche Bank, told the WSJ.</p><p>Adding to bets of a recession, the bond market’s recession indicator, an inverted yield curve, recently reached its widest level in two decades—the majority of past recessions were preceded by an inverted yield curve or when yields on later-dated bonds dip below yields of short-term debt.</p><p>Meanwhile, many market observers have raised bets that the Federal Reserve will hike interest rates by a full percentage point at the next meeting, something that hasn’t happened in decades, which further added to the belief that policymakers would drag the economy into a slowdown.</p><p>According to Deutsche Bank estimates, investors have now steadily diminished their exposure to stocks to some of the lowest levels of the past 12 years. In addition, bullish bets in the options market among traders slipped to the lowest level since April 2020.</p><p>“We’ve now determined that it’s better to be slightly short rather than long,” Martin Bergin, president at Dunn Capital Management, told the WSJ. “If there’s a bounce, we’ll start to take on more long exposure.”</p><p>ETF traders who are looking to protect their portfolios from potential pullbacks ahead may consider some exposure to bearish or inverse ETFs to hedge against further falls.</p><p>For example, the <b>ProShares Short S&amp;P500 (SH)</b> takes a simple inverse or -100% daily performance of the S&amp;P 500 index. Alternatively, for the more aggressive trader, leveraged options include the<b>ProShares UltraShort S&amp;P500 ETF (SDS)</b>, which tries to reflect -2x or -200% of the daily performance of the S&amp;P 500, the<b>Direxion Daily S&amp;P 500 Bear 3x Shares (SPXS)</b>, which takes -3x or -300% of the daily performance of the S&amp;P 500, and the<b>ProShares UltraPro Short S&amp;P 500 ETF (SPXU)</b>, which also takes -300% of the daily performance of the S&amp;P 500.</p><p>Those who want to hedge against risk in the Dow Jones Industrial Average can use inverse ETFs to bolster their long equities positions. The <b>ProShares Short Dow 30 ETF(DOG)</b> tries to reflect -100% of the daily performance of the Dow Jones Industrial Average. For more aggressive traders, the <b>ProShares UltraShort Dow 30 ETF (DXD)</b> takes the -200% of the Dow Jones, and the <b>ProShares UltraPro Short Dow 30 (SDOW)</b> reflects the -300% of the Dow.</p><p>Lastly, investors can also hedge against a dipping Nasdaq through bearish options as well. For instance, the <b>ProShares Short QQQ ETF (PSQ)</b> takes the inverse or -100% daily performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index. For the aggressive trader, the <b>ProShares UltraShort QQQ ETF (QID)</b> tracks the double inverse or -200% performance of the Nasdaq-100, and the <b>ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ ETF (SQQQ)</b> reflects the triple inverse or -300% of the Nasdaq-100.</p></body></html>","source":"lsy1657246608114","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Bearish ETF Strategies for a Pessimistic Outlook</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBearish ETF Strategies for a Pessimistic Outlook\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-07-16 10:00 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.etftrends.com/bearish-etf-strategies-for-a-pessimistic-outlook/><strong>VettaFi</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>After a punishing first half of the year for the stock markets, traders continued to ramp up bets against equities. Exchange traded fund investors can also hedge against further market risks with ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.etftrends.com/bearish-etf-strategies-for-a-pessimistic-outlook/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SH":"标普500反向ETF","SPXU":"三倍做空标普500ETF","SPXS":"Direxion每日三倍做空标普500ETF","SDS":"两倍做空标普500ETF"},"source_url":"https://www.etftrends.com/bearish-etf-strategies-for-a-pessimistic-outlook/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1144090895","content_text":"After a punishing first half of the year for the stock markets, traders continued to ramp up bets against equities. Exchange traded fund investors can also hedge against further market risks with bearish or inverse strategies.According to JPMorgan Chase & Co.’s analysis of futures tracking major stock indexes, asset managers and hedge funds raised bets against U.S. stocks to the highest level since 2016 on fears over a global slowdown, theWall Street Journalreported.Additionally, according to a survey by the National Association of Active Investment Managers, the average active investor pared back stock exposure this year and reduced equity allocations to the lowest levels since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic.“Everybody’s focused on recession risk,” Parag Thatte, a strategist at Deutsche Bank, told the WSJ.Adding to bets of a recession, the bond market’s recession indicator, an inverted yield curve, recently reached its widest level in two decades—the majority of past recessions were preceded by an inverted yield curve or when yields on later-dated bonds dip below yields of short-term debt.Meanwhile, many market observers have raised bets that the Federal Reserve will hike interest rates by a full percentage point at the next meeting, something that hasn’t happened in decades, which further added to the belief that policymakers would drag the economy into a slowdown.According to Deutsche Bank estimates, investors have now steadily diminished their exposure to stocks to some of the lowest levels of the past 12 years. In addition, bullish bets in the options market among traders slipped to the lowest level since April 2020.“We’ve now determined that it’s better to be slightly short rather than long,” Martin Bergin, president at Dunn Capital Management, told the WSJ. “If there’s a bounce, we’ll start to take on more long exposure.”ETF traders who are looking to protect their portfolios from potential pullbacks ahead may consider some exposure to bearish or inverse ETFs to hedge against further falls.For example, the ProShares Short S&P500 (SH) takes a simple inverse or -100% daily performance of the S&P 500 index. Alternatively, for the more aggressive trader, leveraged options include theProShares UltraShort S&P500 ETF (SDS), which tries to reflect -2x or -200% of the daily performance of the S&P 500, theDirexion Daily S&P 500 Bear 3x Shares (SPXS), which takes -3x or -300% of the daily performance of the S&P 500, and theProShares UltraPro Short S&P 500 ETF (SPXU), which also takes -300% of the daily performance of the S&P 500.Those who want to hedge against risk in the Dow Jones Industrial Average can use inverse ETFs to bolster their long equities positions. The ProShares Short Dow 30 ETF(DOG) tries to reflect -100% of the daily performance of the Dow Jones Industrial Average. For more aggressive traders, the ProShares UltraShort Dow 30 ETF (DXD) takes the -200% of the Dow Jones, and the ProShares UltraPro Short Dow 30 (SDOW) reflects the -300% of the Dow.Lastly, investors can also hedge against a dipping Nasdaq through bearish options as well. For instance, the ProShares Short QQQ ETF (PSQ) takes the inverse or -100% daily performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index. For the aggressive trader, the ProShares UltraShort QQQ ETF (QID) tracks the double inverse or -200% performance of the Nasdaq-100, and the ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ ETF (SQQQ) reflects the triple inverse or -300% of the Nasdaq-100.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":283,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9076828459,"gmtCreate":1657840029371,"gmtModify":1676536068276,"author":{"id":"3572939161983827","authorId":"3572939161983827","name":"RicPuah","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f228739d2dbb241334ac0736565c39f6","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3572939161983827","idStr":"3572939161983827"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like pls","listText":"Like pls","text":"Like pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9076828459","repostId":"1147310365","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1147310365","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1657812307,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1147310365?lang=&edition=full_marsco","pubTime":"2022-07-14 23:25","market":"us","language":"en","title":"U.S. Stocks Remained Low in Morning Trading; Dow Jone, Nasdaq and S&P 500 Fell Over 1%","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1147310365","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"U.S. stocks remained low in morning trading. Dow Jones slid 1.4%, Nasdaq fell 1.06% while S&P 500 di","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>U.S. stocks remained low in morning trading. Dow Jones slid 1.4%, Nasdaq fell 1.06% while S&amp;P 500 dipped 1.29%.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/14f4b197ee00d49830227cb8e2d95df6\" tg-width=\"629\" tg-height=\"119\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>U.S. Stocks Remained Low in Morning Trading; Dow Jone, Nasdaq and S&P 500 Fell Over 1%</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nU.S. Stocks Remained Low in Morning Trading; Dow Jone, Nasdaq and S&P 500 Fell Over 1%\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-07-14 23:25</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>U.S. stocks remained low in morning trading. Dow Jones slid 1.4%, Nasdaq fell 1.06% while S&amp;P 500 dipped 1.29%.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/14f4b197ee00d49830227cb8e2d95df6\" tg-width=\"629\" tg-height=\"119\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1147310365","content_text":"U.S. stocks remained low in morning trading. Dow Jones slid 1.4%, Nasdaq fell 1.06% while S&P 500 dipped 1.29%.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":161,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9076081682,"gmtCreate":1657760643146,"gmtModify":1676536057582,"author":{"id":"3572939161983827","authorId":"3572939161983827","name":"RicPuah","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f228739d2dbb241334ac0736565c39f6","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3572939161983827","idStr":"3572939161983827"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like pls","listText":"Like pls","text":"Like pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9076081682","repostId":"1176756062","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1176756062","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1657753696,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1176756062?lang=&edition=full_marsco","pubTime":"2022-07-14 07:08","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Fed Could Weigh Historic 100 Basis-Point Hike After Inflation Scorcher","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1176756062","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"Futures show one-in-two chance of super-sized July move75 basis points now also in play for Fed’s Se","content":"<html><head></head><body><ul><li>Futures show one-in-two chance of super-sized July move</li><li>75 basis points now also in play for Fed’s September meeting</li></ul><p>Federal Reserve officials may debate a historic one percentage-point rate hike later this month after another searing inflation report piled pressure on the central bank to act.</p><p>“Everything is in play,” Atlanta Fed President Raphael Bostic told reporters in St. Petersburg, Florida, on Wednesday after US consumer prices rose a faster-than-forecast 9.1% in the year through June. Asked if that included raising rates by a full percentage point, he replied, “it would mean everything.”</p><p>The comments added fuel to bets that the Fed is more likely than not to raise interest rates by 100 basis points when it meets July 26-27, which would be the largest increase since the Fed started directly using overnight interest rates to conduct monetary policy in the early 1990s. Americans are furious over high prices and critics blame the Fed for its initial slow response.</p><p>“I think they have time, if they want, to change that expectation to 100. I don’t think they’ve given us a great reason why they should be going slow here, or being gradual,” said Michael Feroli, chief US economist at JPMorgan Chase &amp; Co.</p><p>“If you do in fact get 100 in July and 75 in September, then I think the growth outlook for later in the year probably deteriorates. Right now I’m inclined to think that the main impact might be to motivate more front loading by the Fed,” he said.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6544da817b130f6caed4282a2e2756e2\" tg-width=\"800\" tg-height=\"387\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>Given the acceleration in monthly inflation, economists at Nomura Securities International now expect a full percentage-point increase in the Fed’s benchmark rate at the upcoming policy meeting.</p><p>“Incoming data suggests the Fed’s inflation problem has worsened, and we expect policy makers to react by scaling up the pace of rate hikes to reinforce their credibility,” Nomura’s Aichi Amemiya, Robert Dent and Jacob Meyer, said in a note.</p><p>Fed Chair Jerome Powell told reporters last month after the central bank raised rates by 75 basis points, to a range of 1.5% to 1.75%, that either a 50 or 75 basis-point increase was likely in July. A majority of his colleagues since then have either echoed his line or endorsed the bigger move.</p><p>Cleveland Fed President Loretta Mester will be interviewed on Bloomberg Television on Wednesday evening. Fed Governor Christopher Waller is scheduled to speak on Thursday, while Bostic and his St. Louis colleague James Bullard both have events on Friday. After that officials enter their pre-meeting blackout period.</p><p>Central banks globally are confronting unprecedented inflation, prompting historic rate hikes from Hungary to Pakistan. The Bank of Canada on Wednesday increased rates by a surprise full percentage point amid fears that decades-high price pressures are becoming entrenched.</p><p>What Bloomberg Economics Says...</p><blockquote>“The Fed is right to worry about the unmooring of inflation expectations -- and this report raises the chance of an even larger rate hike than 75 basis points down the line.”-- Anna Wong and Andrew Husby, economists</blockquote><p>Brett Ryan, senior US economist at Deutsche Bank AG, said it made sense to price in some risk of a larger Fed move, but saw it as unlikely without explicit communication from the central bank.</p><p>“The hawks had to have agreed to the guidance of 50 to 75, with the understanding that if we got an upside print, 75 would be the number,” he said. “They have time to communicate if they want to put that message out there.”</p><p>The US central bank has pivoted to aggressive policy tightening to confront the highest inflation in 40 years, which critics say was egged on by policy makers’ slow initial response. They raised rates by 75 basis points last month -- the largest increase since 1994 -- despite previously signaling that they were on track for a smaller half-point move.</p><p>“You have to put 100 on the table for July,” said Andrew Hollenhorst, Citigroup chief US economist. “Everybody should be quite cautious about calling peak inflation -- a few months ago the peak was supposed to be 8.3%.”</p><p>Fed officials have said they want to push policy into restrictive territory, to a range of 3.25 to 3.5% by the end of this year, according to the median projection from the quarterly economic projections released in June. Futures markets Wednesday showed investors pricing in an even higher 3.5% to 3.75% range by year end.</p><p>Economists warn that such a fast pace of large increases could push the US into recession. Ahandfulof banks are calling for a contraction starting this year, while others see it starting next year.</p><p>“The more aggressive the Fed gets, it’s a question of what kind of recession we are going to get,” said Tom Porcelli, chief US economist at RBC Capital Markets. “It’s really easy to make the case that the Fed is going to be just as spooked by this number as they were the last -- that’s the right way to think about it.”</p><p>The Fed’s abrupt change to a 75 basis-point increase last month came on the back of a preliminary survey showing consumer expectations for future inflation were rising.</p><p>Subsequent updates to the data, which came after the Fed’s meeting, erased most of that uptick, but preliminary July figures, expected Friday, may provide policy makers with more ammunition to super-size this month’s hike.</p><p>Inflation expectations are particularly concerning to Powell and his colleagues, who are trying to avoid a 1970s-style price spiral.</p><p>“After what happened in June, I do not rule anything out,’ said Stephen Stanley, chief economist at Amherst Pierpont Securities. “I had been thinking that the Fed would decelerate to a 50-basis-point-per-meeting pace beginning in September, but if the next two monthly inflation numbers look like May’s and June’s, all bets are off.”</p></body></html>","source":"lsy1584095487587","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Fed Could Weigh Historic 100 Basis-Point Hike After Inflation Scorcher</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFed Could Weigh Historic 100 Basis-Point Hike After Inflation Scorcher\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-07-14 07:08 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-07-13/fed-could-weigh-historic-100-basis-point-hike-after-cpi-scorcher><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Futures show one-in-two chance of super-sized July move75 basis points now also in play for Fed’s September meetingFederal Reserve officials may debate a historic one percentage-point rate hike later ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-07-13/fed-could-weigh-historic-100-basis-point-hike-after-cpi-scorcher\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-07-13/fed-could-weigh-historic-100-basis-point-hike-after-cpi-scorcher","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1176756062","content_text":"Futures show one-in-two chance of super-sized July move75 basis points now also in play for Fed’s September meetingFederal Reserve officials may debate a historic one percentage-point rate hike later this month after another searing inflation report piled pressure on the central bank to act.“Everything is in play,” Atlanta Fed President Raphael Bostic told reporters in St. Petersburg, Florida, on Wednesday after US consumer prices rose a faster-than-forecast 9.1% in the year through June. Asked if that included raising rates by a full percentage point, he replied, “it would mean everything.”The comments added fuel to bets that the Fed is more likely than not to raise interest rates by 100 basis points when it meets July 26-27, which would be the largest increase since the Fed started directly using overnight interest rates to conduct monetary policy in the early 1990s. Americans are furious over high prices and critics blame the Fed for its initial slow response.“I think they have time, if they want, to change that expectation to 100. I don’t think they’ve given us a great reason why they should be going slow here, or being gradual,” said Michael Feroli, chief US economist at JPMorgan Chase & Co.“If you do in fact get 100 in July and 75 in September, then I think the growth outlook for later in the year probably deteriorates. Right now I’m inclined to think that the main impact might be to motivate more front loading by the Fed,” he said.Given the acceleration in monthly inflation, economists at Nomura Securities International now expect a full percentage-point increase in the Fed’s benchmark rate at the upcoming policy meeting.“Incoming data suggests the Fed’s inflation problem has worsened, and we expect policy makers to react by scaling up the pace of rate hikes to reinforce their credibility,” Nomura’s Aichi Amemiya, Robert Dent and Jacob Meyer, said in a note.Fed Chair Jerome Powell told reporters last month after the central bank raised rates by 75 basis points, to a range of 1.5% to 1.75%, that either a 50 or 75 basis-point increase was likely in July. A majority of his colleagues since then have either echoed his line or endorsed the bigger move.Cleveland Fed President Loretta Mester will be interviewed on Bloomberg Television on Wednesday evening. Fed Governor Christopher Waller is scheduled to speak on Thursday, while Bostic and his St. Louis colleague James Bullard both have events on Friday. After that officials enter their pre-meeting blackout period.Central banks globally are confronting unprecedented inflation, prompting historic rate hikes from Hungary to Pakistan. The Bank of Canada on Wednesday increased rates by a surprise full percentage point amid fears that decades-high price pressures are becoming entrenched.What Bloomberg Economics Says...“The Fed is right to worry about the unmooring of inflation expectations -- and this report raises the chance of an even larger rate hike than 75 basis points down the line.”-- Anna Wong and Andrew Husby, economistsBrett Ryan, senior US economist at Deutsche Bank AG, said it made sense to price in some risk of a larger Fed move, but saw it as unlikely without explicit communication from the central bank.“The hawks had to have agreed to the guidance of 50 to 75, with the understanding that if we got an upside print, 75 would be the number,” he said. “They have time to communicate if they want to put that message out there.”The US central bank has pivoted to aggressive policy tightening to confront the highest inflation in 40 years, which critics say was egged on by policy makers’ slow initial response. They raised rates by 75 basis points last month -- the largest increase since 1994 -- despite previously signaling that they were on track for a smaller half-point move.“You have to put 100 on the table for July,” said Andrew Hollenhorst, Citigroup chief US economist. “Everybody should be quite cautious about calling peak inflation -- a few months ago the peak was supposed to be 8.3%.”Fed officials have said they want to push policy into restrictive territory, to a range of 3.25 to 3.5% by the end of this year, according to the median projection from the quarterly economic projections released in June. Futures markets Wednesday showed investors pricing in an even higher 3.5% to 3.75% range by year end.Economists warn that such a fast pace of large increases could push the US into recession. Ahandfulof banks are calling for a contraction starting this year, while others see it starting next year.“The more aggressive the Fed gets, it’s a question of what kind of recession we are going to get,” said Tom Porcelli, chief US economist at RBC Capital Markets. “It’s really easy to make the case that the Fed is going to be just as spooked by this number as they were the last -- that’s the right way to think about it.”The Fed’s abrupt change to a 75 basis-point increase last month came on the back of a preliminary survey showing consumer expectations for future inflation were rising.Subsequent updates to the data, which came after the Fed’s meeting, erased most of that uptick, but preliminary July figures, expected Friday, may provide policy makers with more ammunition to super-size this month’s hike.Inflation expectations are particularly concerning to Powell and his colleagues, who are trying to avoid a 1970s-style price spiral.“After what happened in June, I do not rule anything out,’ said Stephen Stanley, chief economist at Amherst Pierpont Securities. “I had been thinking that the Fed would decelerate to a 50-basis-point-per-meeting pace beginning in September, but if the next two monthly inflation numbers look like May’s and June’s, all bets are off.”","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":527,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9078154172,"gmtCreate":1657667104196,"gmtModify":1676536040692,"author":{"id":"3572939161983827","authorId":"3572939161983827","name":"RicPuah","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f228739d2dbb241334ac0736565c39f6","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3572939161983827","idStr":"3572939161983827"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like pls","listText":"Like pls","text":"Like pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9078154172","repostId":"1160079067","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1160079067","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1657639609,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1160079067?lang=&edition=full_marsco","pubTime":"2022-07-12 23:26","market":"us","language":"en","title":"U.S. Stocks Turned up in Morning Trading; Dow Jone Gained Nearly 0.4% While S&P 500 Rose Over 0.1%","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1160079067","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"U.S. stocks turned up in morning trading; Dow Jone Gained 0.39%, S&P 500 rose 0.12% while Nasdaq ros","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>U.S. stocks turned up in morning trading; Dow Jone Gained 0.39%, S&amp;P 500 rose 0.12% while Nasdaq rose 0.01%.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5b38a1b6c0a37c64dfe55ed1fae289f6\" tg-width=\"631\" tg-height=\"117\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>U.S. Stocks Turned up in Morning Trading; Dow Jone Gained Nearly 0.4% While S&P 500 Rose Over 0.1%</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nU.S. Stocks Turned up in Morning Trading; Dow Jone Gained Nearly 0.4% While S&P 500 Rose Over 0.1%\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-07-12 23:26</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>U.S. stocks turned up in morning trading; Dow Jone Gained 0.39%, S&amp;P 500 rose 0.12% while Nasdaq rose 0.01%.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5b38a1b6c0a37c64dfe55ed1fae289f6\" tg-width=\"631\" tg-height=\"117\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1160079067","content_text":"U.S. stocks turned up in morning trading; Dow Jone Gained 0.39%, S&P 500 rose 0.12% while Nasdaq rose 0.01%.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":368,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9071313513,"gmtCreate":1657488005432,"gmtModify":1676536011555,"author":{"id":"3572939161983827","authorId":"3572939161983827","name":"RicPuah","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f228739d2dbb241334ac0736565c39f6","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3572939161983827","idStr":"3572939161983827"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like pls","listText":"Like pls","text":"Like pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9071313513","repostId":"1176104550","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1176104550","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1657424529,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1176104550?lang=&edition=full_marsco","pubTime":"2022-07-10 11:42","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Shopify Stock Is a Mixed Bag","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1176104550","media":"InvestorPlace","summary":"Shopify(SHOP) has multiple strengths and multiple weaknesses.The valuation of SHOP stock remains ver","content":"<html><head></head><body><ul><li><b>Shopify</b>(<b><u>SHOP</u></b>) has multiple strengths and multiple weaknesses.</li><li>The valuation of SHOP stock remains very high.</li><li>The company&#39;s growth has been decelerating and its profitability has sunk.</li></ul><p>The outlook of <b>Shopify</b>(NYSE:<b><u>SHOP</u></b>) stock is mixed. On the positive side, the company is growing quickly, showing that its niche is still expanding. Additionally, by some measures, it is profitable. Moreover, its chief executive officer (CEO) recently bought a large amount of SHOP stock, suggesting that he has a great deal of confidence in the company’s long-term outlook. And finally, the stock’s valuation has dropped sharply and e-commerce might be revitalized in the second half of the year.</p><p>But on the other hand, the company’s growth has slowed markedly. Its profitability has been declining in recent quarters and its valuation is still very high. Cumulatively, I think that there are several much more attractive stocks in the e-commerce space than Shopify. I still recommend that investors avoid the name.</p><p><b>Shopify’s Strengths</b></p><p>In the first quarter (Q1), the company’s sales jumped 22%year-over-year (YOY) to $1.2 billion. And in the previous quarter, its revenue soared 41% to $1.38 billion. In Q1, Shopify’s operating income, excluding certain items, came in at $32 million.</p><p>Similarly, in Q4, its sales jumped41% YOY to $1.38 billion, while its adjusted operating income was $130 million. Meanwhile, Shopify’s CEO, Tobi Lütke, recently obtained about$10 million of SHOP stock. The move indicates that Lütke is quite bullish on Shopify’s longer term outlook.</p><p>As I’ve written in the past, I believe that e-commerce may be poised to rebound significantly in the second half of the year after the pent-up demand for travel and experiences eases.</p><p>Finally, after SHOP stock tumbled 80% since peaking in November, the company’s valuation has become much more palatable. In the wake of their split, the shares have become more attractive to many retail investors.</p><p><b>Shopify’s Weaknesses</b></p><p>The company’s growth has slowed meaningfully. In 2021, its sales jumped nearly60%. InQ1 and Q4, conversely, its sales climbed 22% YOY and 41% YOY, respectively. The extent of the deceleration leads me to believe that Shopify could be losing market share to a number of its competitors, including <b>Block</b>(NYSE:<b><u>SQ</u></b>) and<b>Wix.com</b>(NASDAQ:<b><u>WIX</u></b>).</p><p>On the profitability front, Shopify’s income from operations sank to $14.4 million in Q4, way down from $117.5 million during the same period a year earlier. Meanwhile, in Q1, it reported a loss from operations of $98 million versus a profit from operations of $119 million during the same period a year earlier.</p><p>SHOP stock hasn’t become cheap either. In fact, its current forward price-to-earnings ratio, according to <i>Yahoo Finance</i>, is a huge 500, while its trailing price-to-sales ratio is a still-hefty 8.28.</p><p><b>Better Bets in the E-Commerce Space</b></p><p><b>Amazon’s</b>(NASDAQ:<b><u>AMZN</u></b>) cloud business is still growing rapidly and gives AMZN stock a big profitability kicker that Shopify lacks. Additionally, given Amazon’s unparalleled share of the e-commerce sector, it’s much less vulnerable to competition than Shopify.</p><p>As the leader of the digital payments space, <b>PayPal</b>(NASDAQ:<b><u>PYPL</u></b>) is well-positioned to benefit from a rebound of e-commerce and is also less likely to be hurt by competition than Shopify. PYPL stock now has a forward price-to-earnings ratio of just 18.38</p><p>Overall, I think there are better bets in the e-commerce space than Shopify.</p></body></html>","source":"lsy1606302653667","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Shopify Stock Is a Mixed Bag</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nShopify Stock Is a Mixed Bag\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-07-10 11:42 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://investorplace.com/2022/07/shop-stock-is-a-mixed-bag/><strong>InvestorPlace</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Shopify(SHOP) has multiple strengths and multiple weaknesses.The valuation of SHOP stock remains very high.The company's growth has been decelerating and its profitability has sunk.The outlook of ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://investorplace.com/2022/07/shop-stock-is-a-mixed-bag/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SHOP":"Shopify Inc"},"source_url":"https://investorplace.com/2022/07/shop-stock-is-a-mixed-bag/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1176104550","content_text":"Shopify(SHOP) has multiple strengths and multiple weaknesses.The valuation of SHOP stock remains very high.The company's growth has been decelerating and its profitability has sunk.The outlook of Shopify(NYSE:SHOP) stock is mixed. On the positive side, the company is growing quickly, showing that its niche is still expanding. Additionally, by some measures, it is profitable. Moreover, its chief executive officer (CEO) recently bought a large amount of SHOP stock, suggesting that he has a great deal of confidence in the company’s long-term outlook. And finally, the stock’s valuation has dropped sharply and e-commerce might be revitalized in the second half of the year.But on the other hand, the company’s growth has slowed markedly. Its profitability has been declining in recent quarters and its valuation is still very high. Cumulatively, I think that there are several much more attractive stocks in the e-commerce space than Shopify. I still recommend that investors avoid the name.Shopify’s StrengthsIn the first quarter (Q1), the company’s sales jumped 22%year-over-year (YOY) to $1.2 billion. And in the previous quarter, its revenue soared 41% to $1.38 billion. In Q1, Shopify’s operating income, excluding certain items, came in at $32 million.Similarly, in Q4, its sales jumped41% YOY to $1.38 billion, while its adjusted operating income was $130 million. Meanwhile, Shopify’s CEO, Tobi Lütke, recently obtained about$10 million of SHOP stock. The move indicates that Lütke is quite bullish on Shopify’s longer term outlook.As I’ve written in the past, I believe that e-commerce may be poised to rebound significantly in the second half of the year after the pent-up demand for travel and experiences eases.Finally, after SHOP stock tumbled 80% since peaking in November, the company’s valuation has become much more palatable. In the wake of their split, the shares have become more attractive to many retail investors.Shopify’s WeaknessesThe company’s growth has slowed meaningfully. In 2021, its sales jumped nearly60%. InQ1 and Q4, conversely, its sales climbed 22% YOY and 41% YOY, respectively. The extent of the deceleration leads me to believe that Shopify could be losing market share to a number of its competitors, including Block(NYSE:SQ) andWix.com(NASDAQ:WIX).On the profitability front, Shopify’s income from operations sank to $14.4 million in Q4, way down from $117.5 million during the same period a year earlier. Meanwhile, in Q1, it reported a loss from operations of $98 million versus a profit from operations of $119 million during the same period a year earlier.SHOP stock hasn’t become cheap either. In fact, its current forward price-to-earnings ratio, according to Yahoo Finance, is a huge 500, while its trailing price-to-sales ratio is a still-hefty 8.28.Better Bets in the E-Commerce SpaceAmazon’s(NASDAQ:AMZN) cloud business is still growing rapidly and gives AMZN stock a big profitability kicker that Shopify lacks. Additionally, given Amazon’s unparalleled share of the e-commerce sector, it’s much less vulnerable to competition than Shopify.As the leader of the digital payments space, PayPal(NASDAQ:PYPL) is well-positioned to benefit from a rebound of e-commerce and is also less likely to be hurt by competition than Shopify. PYPL stock now has a forward price-to-earnings ratio of just 18.38Overall, I think there are better bets in the e-commerce space than Shopify.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":256,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":9006340551,"gmtCreate":1641614814408,"gmtModify":1676533635084,"author":{"id":"3572939161983827","authorId":"3572939161983827","name":"RicPuah","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f228739d2dbb241334ac0736565c39f6","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3572939161983827","authorIdStr":"3572939161983827"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like pls","listText":"Like pls","text":"Like pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":11,"commentSize":5,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9006340551","repostId":"2201424321","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2201424321","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1641597180,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2201424321?lang=&edition=full_marsco","pubTime":"2022-01-08 07:13","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Wall St posts declines for first week of 2022; Nasdaq has worst week since Feb","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2201424321","media":"Reuters","summary":"* U.S. nonfarm payrolls rise by 199,000 in December* GameStop jumps after report of foray into NFT, ","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>* U.S. nonfarm payrolls rise by 199,000 in December</p><p>* GameStop jumps after report of foray into NFT, crypto markets</p><p>* Indexes: Dow down 0.01%, S&amp;P 500 down 0.4%, Nasdaq down 1%</p><p>NEW YORK Jan 7 (Reuters) - Wall Street on Friday wrapped up the first week of the new year with daily and weekly losses as investors worried about looming U.S. interest-rate hikes and unfolding Omicron news.</p><p>The Nasdaq posted its biggest weekly percentage fall since February 2021 and led declines for the day in the major indexes. Stocks fell on Friday after the December U.S. jobs report missed expectations but was still seen as strong enough to keep the Federal Reserve&#39;s tightening path in place.</p><p>Friday&#39;s Labor Department data showed the U.S. jobs market was at or near maximum employment even though employment rose far less than expected in December, when there were worker shortages.</p><p>On Wednesday, minutes released of the Fed&#39;s Dec. 14-15 policy meeting showed officials at the U.S. central bank viewed the labor market as &#34;very tight,&#34; and signaled the Fed may have to raise rates sooner than expected.</p><p>&#34;The investor takeaway is that the labor market continues to be tight despite the headline miss,&#34; said Michael Arone, chief investment strategist at State Street Global Advisors in Boston.</p><p>&#34;Investors are concerned the Fed will be more aggressive than expected.&#34;</p><p>Consumer discretionary and and technology sectors led the way lower on the S&amp;P 500 on Friday. Big tech companies have benefited from low interest rates.</p><p>On the flip side, the S&amp;P 500 financials sector and banking index extended recent gains and reached record closing highs. The bank index rose 9.4% for the week, registering its biggest weekly percentage gain since November 2020.</p><p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 4.81 points, or 0.01%, to 36,231.66, the S&amp;P 500 lost 19.02 points, or 0.41%, to 4,677.03 and the Nasdaq Composite dropped 144.96 points, or 0.96%, to 14,935.90.</p><p>For the week, the Dow fell 0.3%, the S&amp;P 500 declined 1.9% and the Nasdaq dropped 4.5%.</p><p>Banks have risen with U.S. Treasury yields, with the U.S. benchmark 10-year yield soaring to a two-year high on Friday on the outlook for Fed rate hikes.</p><p>&#34;The sentiment has turned negative,&#34; said Jack Dollarhide, chief executive officer of Longbow Asset Management in Tulsa, Oklahoma. &#34;Right now the market is nervous and in the mood to sell at the first hint of bad news.&#34;</p><p>Rising cases on the Omicron variant of the coronavirus also caused investor jitters this week.</p><p>Investors have been rotating out technology-heavy growth shares and into more value-oriented shares, which they think may do better in a high interest-rate environment.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 value index added 1% this week, outperforming the S&amp;P 500 growth index which fell 4.5%, its biggest weekly percentage drop since October 2020.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 energy sector gained sharply for the week, rising 10.6% in its best week since November 2020.</p><p>&#34;Meme stock&#34; GameStop Corp jumped 7.3% after the video game retailer said it is launching a division to develop a marketplace for nonfungible tokens and establish cryptocurrency partnerships.</p><p>Advancing issues outnumbered declining ones on the NYSE by a 1.01-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 1.38-to-1 ratio favored decliners.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 posted 50 new 52-week highs and 1 new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 83 new highs and 262 new lows.</p><p>Volume on U.S. exchanges was 10.21 billion shares, compared with the roughly 10.4 billion average for the full session over the last 20 trading days.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Wall St posts declines for first week of 2022; Nasdaq has worst week since Feb</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWall St posts declines for first week of 2022; Nasdaq has worst week since Feb\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-01-08 07:13</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>* U.S. nonfarm payrolls rise by 199,000 in December</p><p>* GameStop jumps after report of foray into NFT, crypto markets</p><p>* Indexes: Dow down 0.01%, S&amp;P 500 down 0.4%, Nasdaq down 1%</p><p>NEW YORK Jan 7 (Reuters) - Wall Street on Friday wrapped up the first week of the new year with daily and weekly losses as investors worried about looming U.S. interest-rate hikes and unfolding Omicron news.</p><p>The Nasdaq posted its biggest weekly percentage fall since February 2021 and led declines for the day in the major indexes. Stocks fell on Friday after the December U.S. jobs report missed expectations but was still seen as strong enough to keep the Federal Reserve&#39;s tightening path in place.</p><p>Friday&#39;s Labor Department data showed the U.S. jobs market was at or near maximum employment even though employment rose far less than expected in December, when there were worker shortages.</p><p>On Wednesday, minutes released of the Fed&#39;s Dec. 14-15 policy meeting showed officials at the U.S. central bank viewed the labor market as &#34;very tight,&#34; and signaled the Fed may have to raise rates sooner than expected.</p><p>&#34;The investor takeaway is that the labor market continues to be tight despite the headline miss,&#34; said Michael Arone, chief investment strategist at State Street Global Advisors in Boston.</p><p>&#34;Investors are concerned the Fed will be more aggressive than expected.&#34;</p><p>Consumer discretionary and and technology sectors led the way lower on the S&amp;P 500 on Friday. Big tech companies have benefited from low interest rates.</p><p>On the flip side, the S&amp;P 500 financials sector and banking index extended recent gains and reached record closing highs. The bank index rose 9.4% for the week, registering its biggest weekly percentage gain since November 2020.</p><p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 4.81 points, or 0.01%, to 36,231.66, the S&amp;P 500 lost 19.02 points, or 0.41%, to 4,677.03 and the Nasdaq Composite dropped 144.96 points, or 0.96%, to 14,935.90.</p><p>For the week, the Dow fell 0.3%, the S&amp;P 500 declined 1.9% and the Nasdaq dropped 4.5%.</p><p>Banks have risen with U.S. Treasury yields, with the U.S. benchmark 10-year yield soaring to a two-year high on Friday on the outlook for Fed rate hikes.</p><p>&#34;The sentiment has turned negative,&#34; said Jack Dollarhide, chief executive officer of Longbow Asset Management in Tulsa, Oklahoma. &#34;Right now the market is nervous and in the mood to sell at the first hint of bad news.&#34;</p><p>Rising cases on the Omicron variant of the coronavirus also caused investor jitters this week.</p><p>Investors have been rotating out technology-heavy growth shares and into more value-oriented shares, which they think may do better in a high interest-rate environment.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 value index added 1% this week, outperforming the S&amp;P 500 growth index which fell 4.5%, its biggest weekly percentage drop since October 2020.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 energy sector gained sharply for the week, rising 10.6% in its best week since November 2020.</p><p>&#34;Meme stock&#34; GameStop Corp jumped 7.3% after the video game retailer said it is launching a division to develop a marketplace for nonfungible tokens and establish cryptocurrency partnerships.</p><p>Advancing issues outnumbered declining ones on the NYSE by a 1.01-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 1.38-to-1 ratio favored decliners.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 posted 50 new 52-week highs and 1 new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 83 new highs and 262 new lows.</p><p>Volume on U.S. exchanges was 10.21 billion shares, compared with the roughly 10.4 billion average for the full session over the last 20 trading days.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite","GME":"游戏驿站",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2201424321","content_text":"* U.S. nonfarm payrolls rise by 199,000 in December* GameStop jumps after report of foray into NFT, crypto markets* Indexes: Dow down 0.01%, S&P 500 down 0.4%, Nasdaq down 1%NEW YORK Jan 7 (Reuters) - Wall Street on Friday wrapped up the first week of the new year with daily and weekly losses as investors worried about looming U.S. interest-rate hikes and unfolding Omicron news.The Nasdaq posted its biggest weekly percentage fall since February 2021 and led declines for the day in the major indexes. Stocks fell on Friday after the December U.S. jobs report missed expectations but was still seen as strong enough to keep the Federal Reserve's tightening path in place.Friday's Labor Department data showed the U.S. jobs market was at or near maximum employment even though employment rose far less than expected in December, when there were worker shortages.On Wednesday, minutes released of the Fed's Dec. 14-15 policy meeting showed officials at the U.S. central bank viewed the labor market as \"very tight,\" and signaled the Fed may have to raise rates sooner than expected.\"The investor takeaway is that the labor market continues to be tight despite the headline miss,\" said Michael Arone, chief investment strategist at State Street Global Advisors in Boston.\"Investors are concerned the Fed will be more aggressive than expected.\"Consumer discretionary and and technology sectors led the way lower on the S&P 500 on Friday. Big tech companies have benefited from low interest rates.On the flip side, the S&P 500 financials sector and banking index extended recent gains and reached record closing highs. The bank index rose 9.4% for the week, registering its biggest weekly percentage gain since November 2020.The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 4.81 points, or 0.01%, to 36,231.66, the S&P 500 lost 19.02 points, or 0.41%, to 4,677.03 and the Nasdaq Composite dropped 144.96 points, or 0.96%, to 14,935.90.For the week, the Dow fell 0.3%, the S&P 500 declined 1.9% and the Nasdaq dropped 4.5%.Banks have risen with U.S. Treasury yields, with the U.S. benchmark 10-year yield soaring to a two-year high on Friday on the outlook for Fed rate hikes.\"The sentiment has turned negative,\" said Jack Dollarhide, chief executive officer of Longbow Asset Management in Tulsa, Oklahoma. \"Right now the market is nervous and in the mood to sell at the first hint of bad news.\"Rising cases on the Omicron variant of the coronavirus also caused investor jitters this week.Investors have been rotating out technology-heavy growth shares and into more value-oriented shares, which they think may do better in a high interest-rate environment.The S&P 500 value index added 1% this week, outperforming the S&P 500 growth index which fell 4.5%, its biggest weekly percentage drop since October 2020.The S&P 500 energy sector gained sharply for the week, rising 10.6% in its best week since November 2020.\"Meme stock\" GameStop Corp jumped 7.3% after the video game retailer said it is launching a division to develop a marketplace for nonfungible tokens and establish cryptocurrency partnerships.Advancing issues outnumbered declining ones on the NYSE by a 1.01-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 1.38-to-1 ratio favored decliners.The S&P 500 posted 50 new 52-week highs and 1 new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 83 new highs and 262 new lows.Volume on U.S. exchanges was 10.21 billion shares, compared with the roughly 10.4 billion average for the full session over the last 20 trading days.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":173,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":839265117,"gmtCreate":1629161966739,"gmtModify":1676529949124,"author":{"id":"3572939161983827","authorId":"3572939161983827","name":"RicPuah","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f228739d2dbb241334ac0736565c39f6","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3572939161983827","authorIdStr":"3572939161983827"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like and comment pls","listText":"Like and comment pls","text":"Like and comment pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":9,"commentSize":5,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/839265117","repostId":"2160278866","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2160278866","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1629153526,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2160278866?lang=&edition=full_marsco","pubTime":"2021-08-17 06:38","market":"us","language":"en","title":"S&P 500, Dow hit record highs as defensive shares shine","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2160278866","media":"Reuters","summary":"* Healthcare sector rises over 1%, utilities, staples gain\n* Cyclical areas off: Energy, materials, ","content":"<p>* Healthcare sector rises over 1%, utilities, staples gain</p>\n<p>* Cyclical areas off: Energy, materials, financials weak</p>\n<p>* China factory output, retail sales growth slow sharply</p>\n<p>* Tesla slumps after U.S. opens probe into Autopilot</p>\n<p>* Dow up 0.31%, S&amp;P up 0.26%, Nasdaq down 0.2%</p>\n<p>Aug 16 (Reuters) - The benchmark S&amp;P 500 and the Dow industrials hit record highs on Monday as investors moved into defensive sectors and stocks recovered from losses earlier in the session, shaking off glum economic data out of China.</p>\n<p>Economically sensitive groups such as energy, materials and financials were weaker after China's factory output and retail sales growth slowed sharply and missed expectations in July, as new COVID-19 outbreaks and floods disrupted business operations.</p>\n<p>But healthcare gained 1.1%, the best-performing S&amp;P 500 sector. Utilities and consumer staples -- also generally regarded as defensive sectors -- further bolstered market gains.</p>\n<p>The S&amp;P 500 and the Dow both posted record high closes for their fifth straight sessions, even after the major indexes were initially well in the red.</p>\n<p>\"There is just huge amounts of liquidity, massive amounts of cash out there, both on corporate balance sheets and in private investors’ pockets, and because of that every tiny dip that there is, people look for bargains and they buy and they keep it buoyant,\" said Randy Frederick, vice president of trading and derivatives for Charles Schwab in Austin, Texas.</p>\n<p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 110.02 points, or 0.31%, to 35,625.4, the S&amp;P 500 gained 11.71 points, or 0.26%, to 4,479.71 and the Nasdaq Composite dropped 29.14 points, or 0.2%, to 14,793.76.</p>\n<p>A rebound in the U.S. economy including a stellar second-quarter corporate earnings season along with accommodative monetary policy has underpinned positive sentiment for equities. The S&amp;P 500 has gained 100% since its March 2020 low.</p>\n<p>“The overall environment remains supportive of risk assets, so there is a gravitational pull upward for stocks,” said Kristina Hooper, chief global market strategist at Invesco.</p>\n<p>Investors are looking for signs about when the Federal Reserve will rein in its easy money policies, with minutes from the central bank's latest meeting due on Wednesday. A resurgence in COVID-19 cases and the impact on the economy are keeping markets on edge, with investors watching earnings reports from major retailers due later in the week.</p>\n<p>Investors were also digesting news from Afghanistan, where thousands of civilians desperate to flee the country thronged Kabul airport after the Taliban seized the capital.</p>\n<p>In company news, Tesla shares fell 4.3% after U.S. auto safety regulators said they had opened a formal safety probe into the company's driver assistance system Autopilot after a series of crashes involving emergency vehicles.</p>\n<p>Declining issues outnumbered advancing ones on the NYSE by a 1.75-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 2.22-to-1 ratio favored decliners.</p>\n<p>The S&amp;P 500 posted 68 new 52-week highs and one new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 72 new highs and 259 new lows.</p>\n<p>About 8.5 billion shares changed hands in U.S. exchanges, below the 9.2 billion daily average over the last 20 sessions.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>S&P 500, Dow hit record highs as defensive shares shine</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nS&P 500, Dow hit record highs as defensive shares shine\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-08-17 06:38</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>* Healthcare sector rises over 1%, utilities, staples gain</p>\n<p>* Cyclical areas off: Energy, materials, financials weak</p>\n<p>* China factory output, retail sales growth slow sharply</p>\n<p>* Tesla slumps after U.S. opens probe into Autopilot</p>\n<p>* Dow up 0.31%, S&amp;P up 0.26%, Nasdaq down 0.2%</p>\n<p>Aug 16 (Reuters) - The benchmark S&amp;P 500 and the Dow industrials hit record highs on Monday as investors moved into defensive sectors and stocks recovered from losses earlier in the session, shaking off glum economic data out of China.</p>\n<p>Economically sensitive groups such as energy, materials and financials were weaker after China's factory output and retail sales growth slowed sharply and missed expectations in July, as new COVID-19 outbreaks and floods disrupted business operations.</p>\n<p>But healthcare gained 1.1%, the best-performing S&amp;P 500 sector. Utilities and consumer staples -- also generally regarded as defensive sectors -- further bolstered market gains.</p>\n<p>The S&amp;P 500 and the Dow both posted record high closes for their fifth straight sessions, even after the major indexes were initially well in the red.</p>\n<p>\"There is just huge amounts of liquidity, massive amounts of cash out there, both on corporate balance sheets and in private investors’ pockets, and because of that every tiny dip that there is, people look for bargains and they buy and they keep it buoyant,\" said Randy Frederick, vice president of trading and derivatives for Charles Schwab in Austin, Texas.</p>\n<p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 110.02 points, or 0.31%, to 35,625.4, the S&amp;P 500 gained 11.71 points, or 0.26%, to 4,479.71 and the Nasdaq Composite dropped 29.14 points, or 0.2%, to 14,793.76.</p>\n<p>A rebound in the U.S. economy including a stellar second-quarter corporate earnings season along with accommodative monetary policy has underpinned positive sentiment for equities. The S&amp;P 500 has gained 100% since its March 2020 low.</p>\n<p>“The overall environment remains supportive of risk assets, so there is a gravitational pull upward for stocks,” said Kristina Hooper, chief global market strategist at Invesco.</p>\n<p>Investors are looking for signs about when the Federal Reserve will rein in its easy money policies, with minutes from the central bank's latest meeting due on Wednesday. A resurgence in COVID-19 cases and the impact on the economy are keeping markets on edge, with investors watching earnings reports from major retailers due later in the week.</p>\n<p>Investors were also digesting news from Afghanistan, where thousands of civilians desperate to flee the country thronged Kabul airport after the Taliban seized the capital.</p>\n<p>In company news, Tesla shares fell 4.3% after U.S. auto safety regulators said they had opened a formal safety probe into the company's driver assistance system Autopilot after a series of crashes involving emergency vehicles.</p>\n<p>Declining issues outnumbered advancing ones on the NYSE by a 1.75-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 2.22-to-1 ratio favored decliners.</p>\n<p>The S&amp;P 500 posted 68 new 52-week highs and one new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 72 new highs and 259 new lows.</p>\n<p>About 8.5 billion shares changed hands in U.S. exchanges, below the 9.2 billion daily average over the last 20 sessions.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"161125":"标普500","513500":"标普500ETF","SPY":"标普500ETF",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite","SSO":"两倍做多标普500ETF","SPXU":"三倍做空标普500ETF","UPRO":"三倍做多标普500ETF",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","OEF":"标普100指数ETF-iShares","IVV":"标普500指数ETF","SDS":"两倍做空标普500ETF","OEX":"标普100","SH":"标普500反向ETF","TSLA":"特斯拉",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2160278866","content_text":"* Healthcare sector rises over 1%, utilities, staples gain\n* Cyclical areas off: Energy, materials, financials weak\n* China factory output, retail sales growth slow sharply\n* Tesla slumps after U.S. opens probe into Autopilot\n* Dow up 0.31%, S&P up 0.26%, Nasdaq down 0.2%\nAug 16 (Reuters) - The benchmark S&P 500 and the Dow industrials hit record highs on Monday as investors moved into defensive sectors and stocks recovered from losses earlier in the session, shaking off glum economic data out of China.\nEconomically sensitive groups such as energy, materials and financials were weaker after China's factory output and retail sales growth slowed sharply and missed expectations in July, as new COVID-19 outbreaks and floods disrupted business operations.\nBut healthcare gained 1.1%, the best-performing S&P 500 sector. Utilities and consumer staples -- also generally regarded as defensive sectors -- further bolstered market gains.\nThe S&P 500 and the Dow both posted record high closes for their fifth straight sessions, even after the major indexes were initially well in the red.\n\"There is just huge amounts of liquidity, massive amounts of cash out there, both on corporate balance sheets and in private investors’ pockets, and because of that every tiny dip that there is, people look for bargains and they buy and they keep it buoyant,\" said Randy Frederick, vice president of trading and derivatives for Charles Schwab in Austin, Texas.\nThe Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 110.02 points, or 0.31%, to 35,625.4, the S&P 500 gained 11.71 points, or 0.26%, to 4,479.71 and the Nasdaq Composite dropped 29.14 points, or 0.2%, to 14,793.76.\nA rebound in the U.S. economy including a stellar second-quarter corporate earnings season along with accommodative monetary policy has underpinned positive sentiment for equities. The S&P 500 has gained 100% since its March 2020 low.\n“The overall environment remains supportive of risk assets, so there is a gravitational pull upward for stocks,” said Kristina Hooper, chief global market strategist at Invesco.\nInvestors are looking for signs about when the Federal Reserve will rein in its easy money policies, with minutes from the central bank's latest meeting due on Wednesday. A resurgence in COVID-19 cases and the impact on the economy are keeping markets on edge, with investors watching earnings reports from major retailers due later in the week.\nInvestors were also digesting news from Afghanistan, where thousands of civilians desperate to flee the country thronged Kabul airport after the Taliban seized the capital.\nIn company news, Tesla shares fell 4.3% after U.S. auto safety regulators said they had opened a formal safety probe into the company's driver assistance system Autopilot after a series of crashes involving emergency vehicles.\nDeclining issues outnumbered advancing ones on the NYSE by a 1.75-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 2.22-to-1 ratio favored decliners.\nThe S&P 500 posted 68 new 52-week highs and one new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 72 new highs and 259 new lows.\nAbout 8.5 billion shares changed hands in U.S. exchanges, below the 9.2 billion daily average over the last 20 sessions.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":336,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9093551530,"gmtCreate":1643676981586,"gmtModify":1676533842467,"author":{"id":"3572939161983827","authorId":"3572939161983827","name":"RicPuah","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f228739d2dbb241334ac0736565c39f6","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3572939161983827","authorIdStr":"3572939161983827"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like pls","listText":"Like pls","text":"Like pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":8,"commentSize":5,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9093551530","repostId":"2208335465","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2208335465","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1643670433,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2208335465?lang=&edition=full_marsco","pubTime":"2022-02-01 07:07","market":"us","language":"en","title":"US STOCKS-Nasdaq Narrowly Misses Worst January Ever as Wall Street Gains","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2208335465","media":"Reuters","summary":"* Nasdaq posts worst January since 2008* S&P 500, Dow see worst month since March 2020* Citrix falls","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>* Nasdaq posts worst January since 2008</p><p>* S&amp;P 500, Dow see worst month since March 2020</p><p>* Citrix falls on $16.5 bln deal to take it private</p><p>* Indexes end up: Dow 1.17%, S&amp;P 1.89%, Nasdaq 3.41%</p><p>Jan 31 (Reuters) - U.S. stocks closed higher on Monday, at the end of a volatile month for Wall Street where the tech-heavy Nasdaq narrowly avoided its worst ever start to the year and the S&amp;P 500 recorded its weakest January performance since 2009.</p><p>Valuations of growth and technology stocks have come under increasing scrutiny, as investors fretted about companies trading at lofty valuations at a time when the U.S. Federal Reserve is set to begin raising interest rates to combat inflation and withdraw its pandemic stimulus measures.</p><p>In early Monday trading, the Nasdaq was on course to surpass its worst opening-month performance on record, when it fell 9.89% in 2008. However, after its best <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a>-day gain since March 2021, it closed out January down 8.99%.</p><p>&#34;At the end of the day, interest rates are going to have to move higher, and companies with high multiples will have to trade lower,&#34; said Decio Nascimento, chief investment officer of Norbury Partners.</p><p>He added that, with costs such as wages rising, there will be increased investor focus on sectors that can better handle those inflationary pressures, with less latitude for companies which promise future growth but which currently generate negative cash flow.</p><p>All of the 11 major S&amp;P sectors advanced, led by a 3.8% rise in consumer discretionary stocks. The gain was led by Tesla Inc, which jumped 10.7% after Credit Suisse raised the electric car maker&#39;s stock rating to &#34;outperform&#34;.</p><p>For January though, consumer discretionary was the worst performing sector, slipping 9.7%. In all, only the energy sector ended the month in positive territory, aided by oil prices hitting their highest level since October 2014 on Friday.</p><p>Overall, the bellwether S&amp;P 500 had its worst overall month since the pandemic-led crash in March 2020.</p><p>The U.S. Federal Reserve last week signaled it intends to combat the four-decade high inflation by hiking key interest rates more aggressively than many market participants expected.</p><p>Fed funds futures traders are pricing in almost five rate increases by year-end, with some banks, such as the Bank of America now eyeing seven hikes this year.</p><p>&#34;What the Fed did last week was to widen the spectrum of possibility of what rates could be in a year or two, so when you do that, you are going to create volatility in equities&#34; said Norbury Partners&#39; Nascimento.</p><p>Geopolitical tensions have added to market uncertainty, with the U.S. and its allies threatening Russia with new economic sanctions if it attacks Ukraine.</p><p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 406.39 points, or 1.17%, to 35,131.86, the S&amp;P 500 gained 83.7 points, or 1.89%, to 4,515.55 and the Nasdaq Composite added 469.31 points, or 3.41%, to 14,239.88.</p><p>Boeing Co rose 5.1%. The U.S. planemaker secured a launch order from Qatar Airways for a new freighter version of its 777X passenger jet and a provisional order for 737 MAX jets.</p><p>Citrix Systems Inc&#39;s shares fell 3.4% after the software company said it had agreed to be taken private for $16.5 billion including debt by affiliates of Elliott Management and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/VGL.AU\">Vista</a> Equity Partners.</p><p>Volume on U.S. exchanges was 12.67 billion shares, compared with the 12.37 billion average for the full session over the last 20 trading days.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 posted eight new 52-week highs and no new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 30 new highs and 45 new lows.</p></body></html>","source":"yahoofinance","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>US STOCKS-Nasdaq Narrowly Misses Worst January Ever as Wall Street Gains</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nUS STOCKS-Nasdaq Narrowly Misses Worst January Ever as Wall Street Gains\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-02-01 07:07 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/us-stocks-nasdaq-narrowly-misses-214318546.html><strong>Reuters</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>* Nasdaq posts worst January since 2008* S&P 500, Dow see worst month since March 2020* Citrix falls on $16.5 bln deal to take it private* Indexes end up: Dow 1.17%, S&P 1.89%, Nasdaq 3.41%Jan 31 (...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/us-stocks-nasdaq-narrowly-misses-214318546.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"CTXS":"思杰系统","COMP":"Compass, Inc.","BA":"波音"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/us-stocks-nasdaq-narrowly-misses-214318546.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5f26f4a48f9cb3e29be4d71d3ba8c038","article_id":"2208335465","content_text":"* Nasdaq posts worst January since 2008* S&P 500, Dow see worst month since March 2020* Citrix falls on $16.5 bln deal to take it private* Indexes end up: Dow 1.17%, S&P 1.89%, Nasdaq 3.41%Jan 31 (Reuters) - U.S. stocks closed higher on Monday, at the end of a volatile month for Wall Street where the tech-heavy Nasdaq narrowly avoided its worst ever start to the year and the S&P 500 recorded its weakest January performance since 2009.Valuations of growth and technology stocks have come under increasing scrutiny, as investors fretted about companies trading at lofty valuations at a time when the U.S. Federal Reserve is set to begin raising interest rates to combat inflation and withdraw its pandemic stimulus measures.In early Monday trading, the Nasdaq was on course to surpass its worst opening-month performance on record, when it fell 9.89% in 2008. However, after its best one-day gain since March 2021, it closed out January down 8.99%.\"At the end of the day, interest rates are going to have to move higher, and companies with high multiples will have to trade lower,\" said Decio Nascimento, chief investment officer of Norbury Partners.He added that, with costs such as wages rising, there will be increased investor focus on sectors that can better handle those inflationary pressures, with less latitude for companies which promise future growth but which currently generate negative cash flow.All of the 11 major S&P sectors advanced, led by a 3.8% rise in consumer discretionary stocks. The gain was led by Tesla Inc, which jumped 10.7% after Credit Suisse raised the electric car maker's stock rating to \"outperform\".For January though, consumer discretionary was the worst performing sector, slipping 9.7%. In all, only the energy sector ended the month in positive territory, aided by oil prices hitting their highest level since October 2014 on Friday.Overall, the bellwether S&P 500 had its worst overall month since the pandemic-led crash in March 2020.The U.S. Federal Reserve last week signaled it intends to combat the four-decade high inflation by hiking key interest rates more aggressively than many market participants expected.Fed funds futures traders are pricing in almost five rate increases by year-end, with some banks, such as the Bank of America now eyeing seven hikes this year.\"What the Fed did last week was to widen the spectrum of possibility of what rates could be in a year or two, so when you do that, you are going to create volatility in equities\" said Norbury Partners' Nascimento.Geopolitical tensions have added to market uncertainty, with the U.S. and its allies threatening Russia with new economic sanctions if it attacks Ukraine.The Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 406.39 points, or 1.17%, to 35,131.86, the S&P 500 gained 83.7 points, or 1.89%, to 4,515.55 and the Nasdaq Composite added 469.31 points, or 3.41%, to 14,239.88.Boeing Co rose 5.1%. The U.S. planemaker secured a launch order from Qatar Airways for a new freighter version of its 777X passenger jet and a provisional order for 737 MAX jets.Citrix Systems Inc's shares fell 3.4% after the software company said it had agreed to be taken private for $16.5 billion including debt by affiliates of Elliott Management and Vista Equity Partners.Volume on U.S. exchanges was 12.67 billion shares, compared with the 12.37 billion average for the full session over the last 20 trading days.The S&P 500 posted eight new 52-week highs and no new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 30 new highs and 45 new lows.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":401,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":812773406,"gmtCreate":1630627553905,"gmtModify":1676530358631,"author":{"id":"3572939161983827","authorId":"3572939161983827","name":"RicPuah","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f228739d2dbb241334ac0736565c39f6","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3572939161983827","authorIdStr":"3572939161983827"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like and comment pls","listText":"Like and comment pls","text":"Like and comment pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":10,"commentSize":4,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/812773406","repostId":"2164829818","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":317,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9052222214,"gmtCreate":1655181398538,"gmtModify":1676535577273,"author":{"id":"3572939161983827","authorId":"3572939161983827","name":"RicPuah","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f228739d2dbb241334ac0736565c39f6","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3572939161983827","authorIdStr":"3572939161983827"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like pls","listText":"Like pls","text":"Like pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":5,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9052222214","repostId":"2243690068","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2243690068","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1655172324,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2243690068?lang=&edition=full_marsco","pubTime":"2022-06-14 10:05","market":"us","language":"en","title":"The S&P 500 Just Confirmed a Bear Market: What Investors Need to Know","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2243690068","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"Close below 3,837.25 confirms the end of the pandemic bull marketThe bear is back.The S&P 500 on Mon","content":"<html><head></head><body><h2>Close below 3,837.25 confirms the end of the pandemic bull market</h2><p>The bear is back.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 on Monday confirmed what many investors have been saying for months: The large-cap benchmark is in the grips of a bear market.</p><p>Stocks suffered sharp losses Monday after major benchmarks saw their worst week since January. Much of the weakness was attributed to the Friday reading of the May consumer-price index, which surged to 8.6% year-over-year -- a 40-year high. Investors fear the Federal Reserve will have to raise rates even more aggressively than already expected, risking recession in their effort to tame inflation.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500  fell 151.23 points, or 3.9%, to end at 3,749.63, down 21.8% from its Jan. 3 record close and surpassing the 20% pullback threshold  traditionally used to define a bear market.</p><p>Need to Know: The S&amp;P 500 is clinging to a key support level after Friday&#39;s meltdown, here&#39;s what happens if that fails</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 briefly traded below the bear-market threshold in May, but didn&#39;t close below it. Stocks subsequently bounced, but the rebound has since given way as recession fears have increased.</p><p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average  finished with a loss of 876.05 points, or 2.8%, to finish at 30,516.74, after dropping more than 1,000 points at its session low. A close below 29,439.72 would put the blue-chip gauge into a bear market. The tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite , which slumped into a bear market earlier this year, dropped 4.7% on Monday, leaving it nearly 33% below its Nov. 19, 2021, record close.</p><p>To be sure, many investors and analysts see a 20% pullback as an overly formal if not outdated metric, arguing that stocks have long been behaving in bearlike fashion.</p><p>Note that the S&amp;P 500&#39;s finish on Monday means the start of the bear market is backdated the Jan. 3 peak. A bear market is declared over once the S&amp;P 500 has risen 20% from a low.</p><p>How have stocks behaved once a bear market has been confirmed? History shows that usually more pain was in store.</p><p>There have been 17 bear -- or near-bear-- markets since World War II, said Ryan Detrick, chief market strategist for LPL Financial, in a May note. Generally speaking, the S&amp;P 500 has fallen further once a bear market begins. And, he said, bear markets have, on average, lasted about a year, producing an average peak-to-trough decline of just shy of 30%. (see table below).</p><p>Beyond the averages, there&#39;s a lot of variability in the length and depth of past bear markets. The steepest fall, a peak-to-trough decline of nearly 57%, occurred in the 17 months that marked the 17-month bear market that accompanied the 2007-2009 financial crisis. The longest was a 48.2% drop that ran for nearly 21 months in 1973-74. The shortest was the nearly 34% drop that took place over just 23 trading sessions as the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic sparked a global rout that bottomed out on March 23, 2020, and marked the start of the current bull market.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>The S&P 500 Just Confirmed a Bear Market: What Investors Need to Know</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nThe S&P 500 Just Confirmed a Bear Market: What Investors Need to Know\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-06-14 10:05</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><h2>Close below 3,837.25 confirms the end of the pandemic bull market</h2><p>The bear is back.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 on Monday confirmed what many investors have been saying for months: The large-cap benchmark is in the grips of a bear market.</p><p>Stocks suffered sharp losses Monday after major benchmarks saw their worst week since January. Much of the weakness was attributed to the Friday reading of the May consumer-price index, which surged to 8.6% year-over-year -- a 40-year high. Investors fear the Federal Reserve will have to raise rates even more aggressively than already expected, risking recession in their effort to tame inflation.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500  fell 151.23 points, or 3.9%, to end at 3,749.63, down 21.8% from its Jan. 3 record close and surpassing the 20% pullback threshold  traditionally used to define a bear market.</p><p>Need to Know: The S&amp;P 500 is clinging to a key support level after Friday&#39;s meltdown, here&#39;s what happens if that fails</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 briefly traded below the bear-market threshold in May, but didn&#39;t close below it. Stocks subsequently bounced, but the rebound has since given way as recession fears have increased.</p><p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average  finished with a loss of 876.05 points, or 2.8%, to finish at 30,516.74, after dropping more than 1,000 points at its session low. A close below 29,439.72 would put the blue-chip gauge into a bear market. The tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite , which slumped into a bear market earlier this year, dropped 4.7% on Monday, leaving it nearly 33% below its Nov. 19, 2021, record close.</p><p>To be sure, many investors and analysts see a 20% pullback as an overly formal if not outdated metric, arguing that stocks have long been behaving in bearlike fashion.</p><p>Note that the S&amp;P 500&#39;s finish on Monday means the start of the bear market is backdated the Jan. 3 peak. A bear market is declared over once the S&amp;P 500 has risen 20% from a low.</p><p>How have stocks behaved once a bear market has been confirmed? History shows that usually more pain was in store.</p><p>There have been 17 bear -- or near-bear-- markets since World War II, said Ryan Detrick, chief market strategist for LPL Financial, in a May note. Generally speaking, the S&amp;P 500 has fallen further once a bear market begins. And, he said, bear markets have, on average, lasted about a year, producing an average peak-to-trough decline of just shy of 30%. (see table below).</p><p>Beyond the averages, there&#39;s a lot of variability in the length and depth of past bear markets. The steepest fall, a peak-to-trough decline of nearly 57%, occurred in the 17 months that marked the 17-month bear market that accompanied the 2007-2009 financial crisis. The longest was a 48.2% drop that ran for nearly 21 months in 1973-74. The shortest was the nearly 34% drop that took place over just 23 trading sessions as the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic sparked a global rout that bottomed out on March 23, 2020, and marked the start of the current bull market.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"161125":"标普500","513500":"标普500ETF","SSO":"两倍做多标普500ETF","SPXU":"三倍做空标普500ETF",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","UPRO":"三倍做多标普500ETF","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","OEF":"标普100指数ETF-iShares","SDS":"两倍做空标普500ETF","OEX":"标普100","SH":"标普500反向ETF","BK4504":"桥水持仓","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓","BK4581":"高盛持仓","IVV":"标普500指数ETF","BK4559":"巴菲特持仓","SPY":"标普500ETF"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2243690068","content_text":"Close below 3,837.25 confirms the end of the pandemic bull marketThe bear is back.The S&P 500 on Monday confirmed what many investors have been saying for months: The large-cap benchmark is in the grips of a bear market.Stocks suffered sharp losses Monday after major benchmarks saw their worst week since January. Much of the weakness was attributed to the Friday reading of the May consumer-price index, which surged to 8.6% year-over-year -- a 40-year high. Investors fear the Federal Reserve will have to raise rates even more aggressively than already expected, risking recession in their effort to tame inflation.The S&P 500  fell 151.23 points, or 3.9%, to end at 3,749.63, down 21.8% from its Jan. 3 record close and surpassing the 20% pullback threshold  traditionally used to define a bear market.Need to Know: The S&P 500 is clinging to a key support level after Friday's meltdown, here's what happens if that failsThe S&P 500 briefly traded below the bear-market threshold in May, but didn't close below it. Stocks subsequently bounced, but the rebound has since given way as recession fears have increased.The Dow Jones Industrial Average  finished with a loss of 876.05 points, or 2.8%, to finish at 30,516.74, after dropping more than 1,000 points at its session low. A close below 29,439.72 would put the blue-chip gauge into a bear market. The tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite , which slumped into a bear market earlier this year, dropped 4.7% on Monday, leaving it nearly 33% below its Nov. 19, 2021, record close.To be sure, many investors and analysts see a 20% pullback as an overly formal if not outdated metric, arguing that stocks have long been behaving in bearlike fashion.Note that the S&P 500's finish on Monday means the start of the bear market is backdated the Jan. 3 peak. A bear market is declared over once the S&P 500 has risen 20% from a low.How have stocks behaved once a bear market has been confirmed? History shows that usually more pain was in store.There have been 17 bear -- or near-bear-- markets since World War II, said Ryan Detrick, chief market strategist for LPL Financial, in a May note. Generally speaking, the S&P 500 has fallen further once a bear market begins. And, he said, bear markets have, on average, lasted about a year, producing an average peak-to-trough decline of just shy of 30%. (see table below).Beyond the averages, there's a lot of variability in the length and depth of past bear markets. The steepest fall, a peak-to-trough decline of nearly 57%, occurred in the 17 months that marked the 17-month bear market that accompanied the 2007-2009 financial crisis. The longest was a 48.2% drop that ran for nearly 21 months in 1973-74. The shortest was the nearly 34% drop that took place over just 23 trading sessions as the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic sparked a global rout that bottomed out on March 23, 2020, and marked the start of the current bull market.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":268,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9035606963,"gmtCreate":1647572484566,"gmtModify":1676534246272,"author":{"id":"3572939161983827","authorId":"3572939161983827","name":"RicPuah","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f228739d2dbb241334ac0736565c39f6","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3572939161983827","authorIdStr":"3572939161983827"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like pls","listText":"Like pls","text":"Like pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":9,"commentSize":4,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9035606963","repostId":"2220742980","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2220742980","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1647557362,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2220742980?lang=&edition=full_marsco","pubTime":"2022-03-18 06:49","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Wall Street Closes Higher as Worries Ease around Fed, Russian Default","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2220742980","media":"Reuters","summary":"* Energy sector rallies with oil, defensive sectors underperform* U.S. weekly jobless claims fall am","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>* Energy sector rallies with oil, defensive sectors underperform</p><p>* U.S. weekly jobless claims fall amid strong demand for workers</p><p>* Indexes up: Dow 1.23%, S&amp;P 500 1.23%, Nasdaq 1.33%</p><p>March 17 (Reuters) - All three of Wall Street&#39;s major indexes advanced more than 1% on Thursday as investors considered the Federal Reserve&#39;s path for interest rate hikes and worries eased about the prospects of a Russian default after creditors received payments.</p><p>Investors were reassured that Russia may, at least for now,have averted what would have been its first external bond default in a century. This was because creditors received payment, in dollars, of Russian bond coupons which fell due this week, two market sources told Reuters on Thursday.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500, the Dow Jones Industrial Average and the Nasdaq registered their biggest 3-session percentage gain since early November 2020 after the reports boosted risk appetites in a market already benefiting from bargain hunting. The S&amp;P 500 also witnessed its third straight day of more than 1% advances.</p><p>The Fed had raised interest rates by a quarter of a percentage point on Wednesday as expected and forecast an aggressive plan for further hikes while policymakers also trimmed economic growth projections for the year.</p><p>The Russian payment news and a breaking of technical decline lines &#34;to the upside&#34; in indices, including the S&amp;P and the Nasdaq, all boosted stocks, according to Michael James, managing director of equity trading at Wedbush Securities.</p><p>&#34;It&#39;s giving investors an increased level of cautious optimism which is a change from the significant pessimism we&#39;ve been experiencing since early January,&#34; said James.</p><p>&#34;People have gotten more comfortable with the fact rates are going higher. This has been talked about ad nauseum by Chairman (Jerome) Powell since early December,&#34; he said. &#34;The fact there were no significant negative surprises in the Fed&#39;s plans coming out of the meeting, and Powell&#39;s commentary, gave people a sense that maybe we&#39;ve seen as bad as it&#39;s going to get in the near term.&#34;</p><p>Describing the Fed&#39;s plans as dovish, Phil Blancato, CEO of Ladenburg Thalmann Asset Management in New York also said the continuation of Russia, Ukraine peace talks helped the mood.</p><p>&#34;What you&#39;re seeing today simply as a spillover effect from yesterday,&#34; said Blancato. &#34;There&#39;s a potential resolution for the conflict overseas, the positive effects of the Federal Reserve and stocks at a very fair entry point, providing an opportunity to add risk.&#34;</p><p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 417.66 points, or 1.23%, to 34,480.76, the S&amp;P 500 gained 53.81 points, or 1.23%, to 4,411.67 and the Nasdaq Composite added 178.23 points, or 1.33%, to 13,614.78.</p><p>The energy sector was the biggest percentage gainer among the S&amp;P&#39;s 11 major industry sectors, ending up 3.5% as oil prices rose 8% as the crude market rebounded from several days of losses with a renewed focus on supply shortages in coming weeks due to sanctions on Russia.</p><p>The sector laggards were more the most defensive industries with utilities    adding just 0.5% and consumer staples, which rose 0.6%.</p><p>The interest rate sensitive S&amp;P banks index ended the session slightly higher after falling 2% earlier in the session and rallying 3.7% on Wednesday. The U.S. Treasury yield curve rebounded, after earlier reaching its flattest level in more than two years.</p><p>Russian and Ukrainian officials met again on Thursday for peace talks, but said their positions were far apart.</p><p>Earlier on Thursday, data showed weekly jobless claims fell last week as demand for labor remained strong, positioning the economy for another month of solid job gains.</p><p>Advancing issues outnumbered declining ones on the NYSE by a 4.10-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 2.93-to-1 ratio favored advancers.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 posted 18 new 52-week highs and no new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 46 new highs and 53 new lows.</p><p>On U.S. exchanges 12.88 billion shares changed hands compared with the 20 day moving average of 14.18 billion.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Wall Street Closes Higher as Worries Ease around Fed, Russian Default</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWall Street Closes Higher as Worries Ease around Fed, Russian Default\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-03-18 06:49</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>* Energy sector rallies with oil, defensive sectors underperform</p><p>* U.S. weekly jobless claims fall amid strong demand for workers</p><p>* Indexes up: Dow 1.23%, S&amp;P 500 1.23%, Nasdaq 1.33%</p><p>March 17 (Reuters) - All three of Wall Street&#39;s major indexes advanced more than 1% on Thursday as investors considered the Federal Reserve&#39;s path for interest rate hikes and worries eased about the prospects of a Russian default after creditors received payments.</p><p>Investors were reassured that Russia may, at least for now,have averted what would have been its first external bond default in a century. This was because creditors received payment, in dollars, of Russian bond coupons which fell due this week, two market sources told Reuters on Thursday.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500, the Dow Jones Industrial Average and the Nasdaq registered their biggest 3-session percentage gain since early November 2020 after the reports boosted risk appetites in a market already benefiting from bargain hunting. The S&amp;P 500 also witnessed its third straight day of more than 1% advances.</p><p>The Fed had raised interest rates by a quarter of a percentage point on Wednesday as expected and forecast an aggressive plan for further hikes while policymakers also trimmed economic growth projections for the year.</p><p>The Russian payment news and a breaking of technical decline lines &#34;to the upside&#34; in indices, including the S&amp;P and the Nasdaq, all boosted stocks, according to Michael James, managing director of equity trading at Wedbush Securities.</p><p>&#34;It&#39;s giving investors an increased level of cautious optimism which is a change from the significant pessimism we&#39;ve been experiencing since early January,&#34; said James.</p><p>&#34;People have gotten more comfortable with the fact rates are going higher. This has been talked about ad nauseum by Chairman (Jerome) Powell since early December,&#34; he said. &#34;The fact there were no significant negative surprises in the Fed&#39;s plans coming out of the meeting, and Powell&#39;s commentary, gave people a sense that maybe we&#39;ve seen as bad as it&#39;s going to get in the near term.&#34;</p><p>Describing the Fed&#39;s plans as dovish, Phil Blancato, CEO of Ladenburg Thalmann Asset Management in New York also said the continuation of Russia, Ukraine peace talks helped the mood.</p><p>&#34;What you&#39;re seeing today simply as a spillover effect from yesterday,&#34; said Blancato. &#34;There&#39;s a potential resolution for the conflict overseas, the positive effects of the Federal Reserve and stocks at a very fair entry point, providing an opportunity to add risk.&#34;</p><p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 417.66 points, or 1.23%, to 34,480.76, the S&amp;P 500 gained 53.81 points, or 1.23%, to 4,411.67 and the Nasdaq Composite added 178.23 points, or 1.33%, to 13,614.78.</p><p>The energy sector was the biggest percentage gainer among the S&amp;P&#39;s 11 major industry sectors, ending up 3.5% as oil prices rose 8% as the crude market rebounded from several days of losses with a renewed focus on supply shortages in coming weeks due to sanctions on Russia.</p><p>The sector laggards were more the most defensive industries with utilities    adding just 0.5% and consumer staples, which rose 0.6%.</p><p>The interest rate sensitive S&amp;P banks index ended the session slightly higher after falling 2% earlier in the session and rallying 3.7% on Wednesday. The U.S. Treasury yield curve rebounded, after earlier reaching its flattest level in more than two years.</p><p>Russian and Ukrainian officials met again on Thursday for peace talks, but said their positions were far apart.</p><p>Earlier on Thursday, data showed weekly jobless claims fell last week as demand for labor remained strong, positioning the economy for another month of solid job gains.</p><p>Advancing issues outnumbered declining ones on the NYSE by a 4.10-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 2.93-to-1 ratio favored advancers.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 posted 18 new 52-week highs and no new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 46 new highs and 53 new lows.</p><p>On U.S. exchanges 12.88 billion shares changed hands compared with the 20 day moving average of 14.18 billion.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2220742980","content_text":"* Energy sector rallies with oil, defensive sectors underperform* U.S. weekly jobless claims fall amid strong demand for workers* Indexes up: Dow 1.23%, S&P 500 1.23%, Nasdaq 1.33%March 17 (Reuters) - All three of Wall Street's major indexes advanced more than 1% on Thursday as investors considered the Federal Reserve's path for interest rate hikes and worries eased about the prospects of a Russian default after creditors received payments.Investors were reassured that Russia may, at least for now,have averted what would have been its first external bond default in a century. This was because creditors received payment, in dollars, of Russian bond coupons which fell due this week, two market sources told Reuters on Thursday.The S&P 500, the Dow Jones Industrial Average and the Nasdaq registered their biggest 3-session percentage gain since early November 2020 after the reports boosted risk appetites in a market already benefiting from bargain hunting. The S&P 500 also witnessed its third straight day of more than 1% advances.The Fed had raised interest rates by a quarter of a percentage point on Wednesday as expected and forecast an aggressive plan for further hikes while policymakers also trimmed economic growth projections for the year.The Russian payment news and a breaking of technical decline lines \"to the upside\" in indices, including the S&P and the Nasdaq, all boosted stocks, according to Michael James, managing director of equity trading at Wedbush Securities.\"It's giving investors an increased level of cautious optimism which is a change from the significant pessimism we've been experiencing since early January,\" said James.\"People have gotten more comfortable with the fact rates are going higher. This has been talked about ad nauseum by Chairman (Jerome) Powell since early December,\" he said. \"The fact there were no significant negative surprises in the Fed's plans coming out of the meeting, and Powell's commentary, gave people a sense that maybe we've seen as bad as it's going to get in the near term.\"Describing the Fed's plans as dovish, Phil Blancato, CEO of Ladenburg Thalmann Asset Management in New York also said the continuation of Russia, Ukraine peace talks helped the mood.\"What you're seeing today simply as a spillover effect from yesterday,\" said Blancato. \"There's a potential resolution for the conflict overseas, the positive effects of the Federal Reserve and stocks at a very fair entry point, providing an opportunity to add risk.\"The Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 417.66 points, or 1.23%, to 34,480.76, the S&P 500 gained 53.81 points, or 1.23%, to 4,411.67 and the Nasdaq Composite added 178.23 points, or 1.33%, to 13,614.78.The energy sector was the biggest percentage gainer among the S&P's 11 major industry sectors, ending up 3.5% as oil prices rose 8% as the crude market rebounded from several days of losses with a renewed focus on supply shortages in coming weeks due to sanctions on Russia.The sector laggards were more the most defensive industries with utilities    adding just 0.5% and consumer staples, which rose 0.6%.The interest rate sensitive S&P banks index ended the session slightly higher after falling 2% earlier in the session and rallying 3.7% on Wednesday. The U.S. Treasury yield curve rebounded, after earlier reaching its flattest level in more than two years.Russian and Ukrainian officials met again on Thursday for peace talks, but said their positions were far apart.Earlier on Thursday, data showed weekly jobless claims fell last week as demand for labor remained strong, positioning the economy for another month of solid job gains.Advancing issues outnumbered declining ones on the NYSE by a 4.10-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 2.93-to-1 ratio favored advancers.The S&P 500 posted 18 new 52-week highs and no new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 46 new highs and 53 new lows.On U.S. exchanges 12.88 billion shares changed hands compared with the 20 day moving average of 14.18 billion.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":201,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9002000625,"gmtCreate":1641859089827,"gmtModify":1676533654943,"author":{"id":"3572939161983827","authorId":"3572939161983827","name":"RicPuah","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f228739d2dbb241334ac0736565c39f6","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3572939161983827","authorIdStr":"3572939161983827"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like pls","listText":"Like pls","text":"Like pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":9,"commentSize":4,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9002000625","repostId":"2202277188","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2202277188","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1641855743,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2202277188?lang=&edition=full_marsco","pubTime":"2022-01-11 07:02","market":"us","language":"en","title":"US STOCKS-Nasdaq Ekes Out Gain in Late Session Comeback","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2202277188","media":"Reuters","summary":"Wall Street's three major indexes staged a late-session comeback on Monday as the Nasdaq managed to ","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Wall Street&#39;s three major indexes staged a late-session comeback on Monday as the Nasdaq managed to eke out a tiny gain and investors swooped in to hunt for bargains, while the S&amp;P 500 and the Dow Jones Industrial Average finished well above their session lows.</p><p>After falling almost 3% earlier in the day and as much as 10.37% below its intraday record level reached on Nov. 22, the technology-heavy Nasdaq pointed sharply higher to regain all its losses for the day in afternoon trading.</p><p>While investors spent the morning fretting about rising bond yields and what this week&#39;s inflation data might mean for U.S. Federal Reserve monetary policy tightening, others took advantage of earlier nerves to buy the dip.</p><p>&#34;We&#39;ve gotten to the point where you wonder if the roller coaster has peaked and is heading straight down. But fundamentally there&#39;s a lot of buyers in this market buying on the dip,&#34; said Rick Meckler, a partner of Cherry Lane Investments, a family investment office in New Vernon, New Jersey who attributed much of the afternoon strength to retail investors buying favorite stocks such as Tesla   .</p><p>Paul Nolte, portfolio manager at Kingsview Investment Management in Chicago also attributed the late session comeback to dip-buyers looking at U.S. Treasury yields fall from their peaks of the day.</p><p>&#34;Some of the tech names are off 5 to 10 percent or more, and people are looking at that and going that looks pretty good - time to snap them up,&#34; said Nolte.</p><p>&#34;The other thing though to keep an eye on is what happens to interest rates because that has really been what&#39;s been dragging technology. We saw little bit of a reversal late in the day in (Treasury yields). They came down just a touch and that was a little bit of a green light for tech investors,&#34; he said.</p><p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average    fell 162.79 points, or 0.45%, to 36,068.87, the S&amp;P 500    lost 6.74 points, or 0.14%, to 4,670.29 and the Nasdaq Composite    added 6.93 points, or 0.05%, to 14,942.83.</p><p>After starting the day among the biggest laggards, the S&amp;P technology index managed to eke out a tiny gain of 0.1%, behind the healthcare sector which closed up 1% and ahead of communications services which, rising 0.02%, was the session&#39;s only other gainer among the 11 major industry sectors.</p><p>The biggest decliners on the day were industrials which closed down 1.2% and materials which dropped 0.99%.</p><p>Traders have ramped up their rate hike expectations since the Fed&#39;s minutes from the December meeting appeared to signal an earlier-than-expected rate rise.</p><p>Goldman Sachs said it expects the Fed to raise rates four times in 2022, compared to its previous forecast of three.</p><p>Earlier the benchmark 10-year Treasury yield rose to its highest level in nearly two years on Monday.</p><p>After falling as much as 4.6% earlier in the session, Nasdaq heavyweight Tesla made a dramatic turnaround to close up 3%.</p><p>Meckler said retail investors appeared to flood back into the stock which had suffered after Chief Executive Elon Musk tweeted on Friday that the electric carmaker will raise the U.S. price of its advanced driver assistant software.</p><p>Nike shares closed down 4.2% after HSBC downgraded the stock to &#34;hold.&#34;</p><p>Declining issues outnumbered advancing ones on the NYSE by a 2.04-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 1.97-to-1 ratio favored decliners.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 posted 38 new 52-week highs and 5 new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 69 new highs and 609 new lows.</p><p>On U.S. exchanges 12.15 billion shares changed hands compared with the 10.55 billion average for the last 20 sessions.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>US STOCKS-Nasdaq Ekes Out Gain in Late Session Comeback</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nUS STOCKS-Nasdaq Ekes Out Gain in Late Session Comeback\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-01-11 07:02</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>Wall Street&#39;s three major indexes staged a late-session comeback on Monday as the Nasdaq managed to eke out a tiny gain and investors swooped in to hunt for bargains, while the S&amp;P 500 and the Dow Jones Industrial Average finished well above their session lows.</p><p>After falling almost 3% earlier in the day and as much as 10.37% below its intraday record level reached on Nov. 22, the technology-heavy Nasdaq pointed sharply higher to regain all its losses for the day in afternoon trading.</p><p>While investors spent the morning fretting about rising bond yields and what this week&#39;s inflation data might mean for U.S. Federal Reserve monetary policy tightening, others took advantage of earlier nerves to buy the dip.</p><p>&#34;We&#39;ve gotten to the point where you wonder if the roller coaster has peaked and is heading straight down. But fundamentally there&#39;s a lot of buyers in this market buying on the dip,&#34; said Rick Meckler, a partner of Cherry Lane Investments, a family investment office in New Vernon, New Jersey who attributed much of the afternoon strength to retail investors buying favorite stocks such as Tesla   .</p><p>Paul Nolte, portfolio manager at Kingsview Investment Management in Chicago also attributed the late session comeback to dip-buyers looking at U.S. Treasury yields fall from their peaks of the day.</p><p>&#34;Some of the tech names are off 5 to 10 percent or more, and people are looking at that and going that looks pretty good - time to snap them up,&#34; said Nolte.</p><p>&#34;The other thing though to keep an eye on is what happens to interest rates because that has really been what&#39;s been dragging technology. We saw little bit of a reversal late in the day in (Treasury yields). They came down just a touch and that was a little bit of a green light for tech investors,&#34; he said.</p><p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average    fell 162.79 points, or 0.45%, to 36,068.87, the S&amp;P 500    lost 6.74 points, or 0.14%, to 4,670.29 and the Nasdaq Composite    added 6.93 points, or 0.05%, to 14,942.83.</p><p>After starting the day among the biggest laggards, the S&amp;P technology index managed to eke out a tiny gain of 0.1%, behind the healthcare sector which closed up 1% and ahead of communications services which, rising 0.02%, was the session&#39;s only other gainer among the 11 major industry sectors.</p><p>The biggest decliners on the day were industrials which closed down 1.2% and materials which dropped 0.99%.</p><p>Traders have ramped up their rate hike expectations since the Fed&#39;s minutes from the December meeting appeared to signal an earlier-than-expected rate rise.</p><p>Goldman Sachs said it expects the Fed to raise rates four times in 2022, compared to its previous forecast of three.</p><p>Earlier the benchmark 10-year Treasury yield rose to its highest level in nearly two years on Monday.</p><p>After falling as much as 4.6% earlier in the session, Nasdaq heavyweight Tesla made a dramatic turnaround to close up 3%.</p><p>Meckler said retail investors appeared to flood back into the stock which had suffered after Chief Executive Elon Musk tweeted on Friday that the electric carmaker will raise the U.S. price of its advanced driver assistant software.</p><p>Nike shares closed down 4.2% after HSBC downgraded the stock to &#34;hold.&#34;</p><p>Declining issues outnumbered advancing ones on the NYSE by a 2.04-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 1.97-to-1 ratio favored decliners.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 posted 38 new 52-week highs and 5 new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 69 new highs and 609 new lows.</p><p>On U.S. exchanges 12.15 billion shares changed hands compared with the 10.55 billion average for the last 20 sessions.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite","TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2202277188","content_text":"Wall Street's three major indexes staged a late-session comeback on Monday as the Nasdaq managed to eke out a tiny gain and investors swooped in to hunt for bargains, while the S&P 500 and the Dow Jones Industrial Average finished well above their session lows.After falling almost 3% earlier in the day and as much as 10.37% below its intraday record level reached on Nov. 22, the technology-heavy Nasdaq pointed sharply higher to regain all its losses for the day in afternoon trading.While investors spent the morning fretting about rising bond yields and what this week's inflation data might mean for U.S. Federal Reserve monetary policy tightening, others took advantage of earlier nerves to buy the dip.\"We've gotten to the point where you wonder if the roller coaster has peaked and is heading straight down. But fundamentally there's a lot of buyers in this market buying on the dip,\" said Rick Meckler, a partner of Cherry Lane Investments, a family investment office in New Vernon, New Jersey who attributed much of the afternoon strength to retail investors buying favorite stocks such as Tesla   .Paul Nolte, portfolio manager at Kingsview Investment Management in Chicago also attributed the late session comeback to dip-buyers looking at U.S. Treasury yields fall from their peaks of the day.\"Some of the tech names are off 5 to 10 percent or more, and people are looking at that and going that looks pretty good - time to snap them up,\" said Nolte.\"The other thing though to keep an eye on is what happens to interest rates because that has really been what's been dragging technology. We saw little bit of a reversal late in the day in (Treasury yields). They came down just a touch and that was a little bit of a green light for tech investors,\" he said.The Dow Jones Industrial Average    fell 162.79 points, or 0.45%, to 36,068.87, the S&P 500    lost 6.74 points, or 0.14%, to 4,670.29 and the Nasdaq Composite    added 6.93 points, or 0.05%, to 14,942.83.After starting the day among the biggest laggards, the S&P technology index managed to eke out a tiny gain of 0.1%, behind the healthcare sector which closed up 1% and ahead of communications services which, rising 0.02%, was the session's only other gainer among the 11 major industry sectors.The biggest decliners on the day were industrials which closed down 1.2% and materials which dropped 0.99%.Traders have ramped up their rate hike expectations since the Fed's minutes from the December meeting appeared to signal an earlier-than-expected rate rise.Goldman Sachs said it expects the Fed to raise rates four times in 2022, compared to its previous forecast of three.Earlier the benchmark 10-year Treasury yield rose to its highest level in nearly two years on Monday.After falling as much as 4.6% earlier in the session, Nasdaq heavyweight Tesla made a dramatic turnaround to close up 3%.Meckler said retail investors appeared to flood back into the stock which had suffered after Chief Executive Elon Musk tweeted on Friday that the electric carmaker will raise the U.S. price of its advanced driver assistant software.Nike shares closed down 4.2% after HSBC downgraded the stock to \"hold.\"Declining issues outnumbered advancing ones on the NYSE by a 2.04-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 1.97-to-1 ratio favored decliners.The S&P 500 posted 38 new 52-week highs and 5 new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 69 new highs and 609 new lows.On U.S. exchanges 12.15 billion shares changed hands compared with the 10.55 billion average for the last 20 sessions.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":390,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":144420337,"gmtCreate":1626310964329,"gmtModify":1703757567482,"author":{"id":"3572939161983827","authorId":"3572939161983827","name":"RicPuah","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f228739d2dbb241334ac0736565c39f6","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3572939161983827","authorIdStr":"3572939161983827"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like and comment pls","listText":"Like and comment pls","text":"Like and comment pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":9,"commentSize":4,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/144420337","repostId":"2151548988","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":345,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":152389693,"gmtCreate":1625270476912,"gmtModify":1703739606750,"author":{"id":"3572939161983827","authorId":"3572939161983827","name":"RicPuah","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f228739d2dbb241334ac0736565c39f6","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3572939161983827","authorIdStr":"3572939161983827"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like and comment","listText":"Like and comment","text":"Like and comment","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":9,"commentSize":4,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/152389693","repostId":"1165340887","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":234,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[{"author":{"id":"3579931573579109","authorId":"3579931573579109","name":"Kiranaar","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fc9541e5ba792fc73edc7524c494929f","crmLevel":7,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"idStr":"3579931573579109","authorIdStr":"3579931573579109"},"content":"done. pls comment back","text":"done. pls comment back","html":"done. pls comment back"}],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":133714503,"gmtCreate":1621811328502,"gmtModify":1704362495614,"author":{"id":"3572939161983827","authorId":"3572939161983827","name":"RicPuah","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f228739d2dbb241334ac0736565c39f6","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3572939161983827","authorIdStr":"3572939161983827"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like and comment pls","listText":"Like and comment pls","text":"Like and comment pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":5,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/133714503","repostId":"2137906121","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":398,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9039888657,"gmtCreate":1646004728535,"gmtModify":1676534080358,"author":{"id":"3572939161983827","authorId":"3572939161983827","name":"RicPuah","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f228739d2dbb241334ac0736565c39f6","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3572939161983827","authorIdStr":"3572939161983827"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like pls","listText":"Like pls","text":"Like pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":10,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9039888657","repostId":"1114953793","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":366,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":803239393,"gmtCreate":1627440093912,"gmtModify":1703490003821,"author":{"id":"3572939161983827","authorId":"3572939161983827","name":"RicPuah","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f228739d2dbb241334ac0736565c39f6","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3572939161983827","authorIdStr":"3572939161983827"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like please","listText":"Like please","text":"Like please","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":10,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/803239393","repostId":"2154991792","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":320,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":146189100,"gmtCreate":1626058827000,"gmtModify":1703752539067,"author":{"id":"3572939161983827","authorId":"3572939161983827","name":"RicPuah","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f228739d2dbb241334ac0736565c39f6","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3572939161983827","authorIdStr":"3572939161983827"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like and comment pls","listText":"Like and comment pls","text":"Like and comment pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":8,"commentSize":4,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/146189100","repostId":"1114863871","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":440,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9028064019,"gmtCreate":1653120071631,"gmtModify":1676535228016,"author":{"id":"3572939161983827","authorId":"3572939161983827","name":"RicPuah","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f228739d2dbb241334ac0736565c39f6","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3572939161983827","authorIdStr":"3572939161983827"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like pls","listText":"Like pls","text":"Like pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":9,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9028064019","repostId":"2237026172","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2237026172","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1653085302,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2237026172?lang=&edition=full_marsco","pubTime":"2022-05-21 06:21","market":"us","language":"en","title":"The S&P 500 Narrowly Averts a Bear Market. How Long Do They Last Once They Arrive?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2237026172","media":"MarketWatch","summary":"Average bear market lasts a little under a year: LPL FinancialJoe Raedle/Getty ImagesThe S&P 500 averted a bear market Friday, trimming losses to finish flat after trading solidly below a key threshol","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Average bear market lasts a little under a year: LPL Financial</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9ec8719446c55ca2119afff7aa944210\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Joe Raedle/Getty Images</span></p><p>The S&amp;P 500 averted a bear market Friday, trimming losses to finish flat after trading solidly below a key threshold. But history shows that when a bear arrives, it tends to stick around awhile.</p><p>The large-cap U.S. benchmark  ended the session with a gain of less than a point at 3,901.36 after trading as low as 3,810.32. A close below 3,837.25 would mark a 20% pullback from the S&amp;P 500&#39;s Jan. 3 record finish, meeting the traditional definition of a bear market, according to Dow Jones Market Data.</p><p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average  erased a 617 point loss to end the day at 31,261.90. A finish below 29,439.72 would put the blue-chip gauge into a bear market.</p><p>To be sure, many investors and analysts see that 20% definition as an overly formal if not outdated metric, arguing that stocks have been behaving in bear-like fashion for weeks.</p><p>And note, that if the S&amp;P 500 were to close below the threshold in the coming days, the start of the bear market would be backdated to the Jan. 3 peak. A bear market is declared over once the S&amp;P 500 has risen 20% from a low.</p><p>OK, so what does history say about what happens once a bear market begins?</p><p>There have been 17 bear --- or near-bear--- markets since World War II, said Ryan Detrick, chief market strategist for LPL Financial, in a Wednesday note. Generally speaking, the S&amp;P 500 has fallen further once a bear market begins. And, he said, bear markets have, on average, lasted about a year, producing an average peak-to-trough decline of just shy of 30%. (see table below).</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/051788c3944a663c19e8570bcd44348f\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"550\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>LPL Research</span></p><p>The steepest fall, a peak-to-trough decline of nearly 57%, occurred in the 17 months that marked the 17-month bear market that accompanied the 2007-2009 financial crisis. The longest was a 48.2% drop that ran for nearly 21 months in 1973-74. The shortest was the nearly 34% drop that took place over just 23 trading sessions as the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic sparked a global rout that bottomed out on March 23, 2020, and marked the start of the current bull market.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 neared bear territory last week before a strong Friday-the-13th bounce that halved its weekly losses. Another strong bounce was seen May 17, but gains were more than erased in the following session after downbeat results from retailing giant Target Corp. underlined fears that inflation pressures were beginning to take a toll on margins.</p><p>The earnings from Target and, a day earlier, Walmart Inc. &#34;have me concerned that bad things may be starting to happen in the U.S. economy,&#34; said Tom Essaye, founder of Sevens Report Research, in a Thursday note.</p><p>&#34;Namely, that the length of high inflation has infiltrated the lower income cohorts of the economy, and they are now reacting, quickly. And as inflation stays high and the economy slows, that will creep &#39;up&#39; the income distribution, and the concern is the margin issues TGT and WMT are facing will spread to other parts of the retail space and the market more broadly,&#34; Essaye wrote.</p><p>Mike Mullaney, director of global markets research at Boston Partners, worries that Wall Street analysts have yet to catch up to the danger. While earnings expectations for companies in emerging markets and the broader developed-markets indexes have turned down, that isn&#39;t the case for the S&amp;P 500, he noted, in a Thursday interview.. That indicates that the analysts covering the S&amp;P 500 are &#34;behind the curve,&#34; which could be one of the last shoes that has to drop, he said.</p></body></html>","source":"lsy1603348471595","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>The S&P 500 Narrowly Averts a Bear Market. How Long Do They Last Once They Arrive?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nThe S&P 500 Narrowly Averts a Bear Market. How Long Do They Last Once They Arrive?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-05-21 06:21 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.marketwatch.com/story/selloff-puts-s-p-500-on-bear-markets-doorstep-if-history-is-a-guide-theres-more-pain-ahead-11653002466?mod=home-page><strong>MarketWatch</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Average bear market lasts a little under a year: LPL FinancialJoe Raedle/Getty ImagesThe S&P 500 averted a bear market Friday, trimming losses to finish flat after trading solidly below a key ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/selloff-puts-s-p-500-on-bear-markets-doorstep-if-history-is-a-guide-theres-more-pain-ahead-11653002466?mod=home-page\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/selloff-puts-s-p-500-on-bear-markets-doorstep-if-history-is-a-guide-theres-more-pain-ahead-11653002466?mod=home-page","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2237026172","content_text":"Average bear market lasts a little under a year: LPL FinancialJoe Raedle/Getty ImagesThe S&P 500 averted a bear market Friday, trimming losses to finish flat after trading solidly below a key threshold. But history shows that when a bear arrives, it tends to stick around awhile.The large-cap U.S. benchmark  ended the session with a gain of less than a point at 3,901.36 after trading as low as 3,810.32. A close below 3,837.25 would mark a 20% pullback from the S&P 500's Jan. 3 record finish, meeting the traditional definition of a bear market, according to Dow Jones Market Data.The Dow Jones Industrial Average  erased a 617 point loss to end the day at 31,261.90. A finish below 29,439.72 would put the blue-chip gauge into a bear market.To be sure, many investors and analysts see that 20% definition as an overly formal if not outdated metric, arguing that stocks have been behaving in bear-like fashion for weeks.And note, that if the S&P 500 were to close below the threshold in the coming days, the start of the bear market would be backdated to the Jan. 3 peak. A bear market is declared over once the S&P 500 has risen 20% from a low.OK, so what does history say about what happens once a bear market begins?There have been 17 bear --- or near-bear--- markets since World War II, said Ryan Detrick, chief market strategist for LPL Financial, in a Wednesday note. Generally speaking, the S&P 500 has fallen further once a bear market begins. And, he said, bear markets have, on average, lasted about a year, producing an average peak-to-trough decline of just shy of 30%. (see table below).LPL ResearchThe steepest fall, a peak-to-trough decline of nearly 57%, occurred in the 17 months that marked the 17-month bear market that accompanied the 2007-2009 financial crisis. The longest was a 48.2% drop that ran for nearly 21 months in 1973-74. The shortest was the nearly 34% drop that took place over just 23 trading sessions as the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic sparked a global rout that bottomed out on March 23, 2020, and marked the start of the current bull market.The S&P 500 neared bear territory last week before a strong Friday-the-13th bounce that halved its weekly losses. Another strong bounce was seen May 17, but gains were more than erased in the following session after downbeat results from retailing giant Target Corp. underlined fears that inflation pressures were beginning to take a toll on margins.The earnings from Target and, a day earlier, Walmart Inc. \"have me concerned that bad things may be starting to happen in the U.S. economy,\" said Tom Essaye, founder of Sevens Report Research, in a Thursday note.\"Namely, that the length of high inflation has infiltrated the lower income cohorts of the economy, and they are now reacting, quickly. And as inflation stays high and the economy slows, that will creep 'up' the income distribution, and the concern is the margin issues TGT and WMT are facing will spread to other parts of the retail space and the market more broadly,\" Essaye wrote.Mike Mullaney, director of global markets research at Boston Partners, worries that Wall Street analysts have yet to catch up to the danger. While earnings expectations for companies in emerging markets and the broader developed-markets indexes have turned down, that isn't the case for the S&P 500, he noted, in a Thursday interview.. That indicates that the analysts covering the S&P 500 are \"behind the curve,\" which could be one of the last shoes that has to drop, he said.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":230,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9084883160,"gmtCreate":1650847158505,"gmtModify":1676534801914,"author":{"id":"3572939161983827","authorId":"3572939161983827","name":"RicPuah","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f228739d2dbb241334ac0736565c39f6","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3572939161983827","authorIdStr":"3572939161983827"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like pls","listText":"Like pls","text":"Like pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":4,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9084883160","repostId":"2230872118","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":382,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9039331793,"gmtCreate":1645921918051,"gmtModify":1676534074361,"author":{"id":"3572939161983827","authorId":"3572939161983827","name":"RicPuah","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f228739d2dbb241334ac0736565c39f6","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3572939161983827","authorIdStr":"3572939161983827"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like pls","listText":"Like pls","text":"Like pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":4,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9039331793","repostId":"1156890483","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":564,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":159027964,"gmtCreate":1624932296458,"gmtModify":1703848236669,"author":{"id":"3572939161983827","authorId":"3572939161983827","name":"RicPuah","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f228739d2dbb241334ac0736565c39f6","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3572939161983827","authorIdStr":"3572939161983827"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like and comment please","listText":"Like and comment please","text":"Like and comment please","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":9,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/159027964","repostId":"2147837316","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":218,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":196124211,"gmtCreate":1621037845833,"gmtModify":1704352203939,"author":{"id":"3572939161983827","authorId":"3572939161983827","name":"RicPuah","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f228739d2dbb241334ac0736565c39f6","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3572939161983827","authorIdStr":"3572939161983827"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like and comment plss","listText":"Like and comment plss","text":"Like and comment plss","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":5,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/196124211","repostId":"1163454382","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":342,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}