Koalala personal page - To The Moon

Koalala

Koalala

No personal profile

599Follow

17Followers

0Topic

0Badge

2023-10-26

bearish market to buy or not to.

2022-11-24

[Cry]

2 Monster Metaverse Stocks Down 70% and 87% to Buy on the Dip

2022-11-02

[Cry]

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2022-10-26

[Cool]

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2022-10-21

[Cry]

5 Reliable Singapore REITs Delivering a Distribution Yield of 5.8% or More

2022-10-15

[Cry]

US STOCKS-Wall St Drops As Consumer Data Stokes Inflation Worry

2022-10-14

[Shy]

Occidental Petroleum Corp. Stock Outperforms Market On Strong Trading Day

2022-10-10

Great ariticle, would you like to share it?

@Lauritzen:Peter Lynch’s 25 Golden Rules for Investing

2022-10-06

[Cool]

Insider Buying 2022: 15 Stocks to Bet On Despite the Bear Market

2022-09-25

[What]

If You're Selling Stocks Because the Fed Is Hiking Interest Rates, You May Be Suffering From “Inflation Illusion”

2022-09-14

[Cool]

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2022-09-10

[Miser]

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2022-09-08

[Cry]

Singapore Stocks to Watch: Nio, Frasers Property, Chip Eng Seng, Watches.Com

2022-09-08

[What]

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2022-04-15

[Cry]

If Musk's $43 Billion Twitter Takeover Falls Apart, Who Else Has Enough Money to Buy the Company?

2022-04-04

$Tesla Motors(TSLA)$everything is worth

2022-02-15

[Cool]

Cathie Wood’s Ark Bought Sea Shares as Gaming Firm Plunged

2022-02-07

[What]

Hot Chinese ADRs Gained in Morning Trading

2021-12-29

[Cool]

PayPal Has a Strong Story If You Look Beyond the Noise

2021-06-15

Everything will be okay

Go to Tiger App to see more news

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"userPageInfo":{"id":3573788001234625,"uuid":"3573788001234625","gmtCreate":1611386867199,"gmtModify":1612492463093,"name":"Koalala","pinyin":"koalala","introduction":"","introductionEn":null,"signature":"","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e5b56f05d7e4c4896da404f0e1420ae1","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":17,"headSize":599,"tweetSize":56,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":3,"name":"书生虎","nameTw":"書生虎","represent":"努力向上","factor":"发布10条非转发主帖,其中5条获得他人回复或点赞","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":"success","userBadges":[{"badgeId":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493-2","templateUuid":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493","name":"Senior Tiger","description":"Join the tiger community for 1000 days","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0063fb68ea29c9ae6858c58630e182d5","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/96c699a93be4214d4b49aea6a5a5d1a4","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/35b0e542a9ff77046ed69ef602bc105d","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.10.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"44212b71d0be4ec88898348dbe882e03-1","templateUuid":"44212b71d0be4ec88898348dbe882e03","name":"Boss Tiger","description":"The transaction amount of the securities account reaches $100,000","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c8dfc27c1ee0e25db1c93e9d0b641101","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f43908c142f8a33c78f5bdf0e2897488","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/82165ff19cb8a786e8919f92acee5213","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.07.14","exceedPercentage":"60.41%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1101},{"badgeId":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789-1","templateUuid":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789","name":"Knowledgeable Investor","description":"Traded more than 10 stocks","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e74cc24115c4fbae6154ec1b1041bf47","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d48265cbfd97c57f9048db29f22227b0","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76c6d6898b073c77e1c537ebe9ac1c57","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1102},{"badgeId":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84-1","templateUuid":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84","name":"Real Trader","description":"Completed a transaction","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100},{"badgeId":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be-2","templateUuid":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be","name":"Master Trader","description":"Total number of securities or futures transactions reached 100","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ad22cfbe2d05aa393b18e9226e4b0307","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/36702e6ff3ffe46acafee66cc85273ca","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d52eb88fa385cf5abe2616ed63781765","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":"80.76%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":5,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":null,"starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"post","tweets":[{"id":234701226549256,"gmtCreate":1698299854376,"gmtModify":1698299858743,"author":{"id":"3573788001234625","authorId":"3573788001234625","name":"Koalala","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e5b56f05d7e4c4896da404f0e1420ae1","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false},"themes":[],"htmlText":"bearish market to buy or not to.&nbsp;","listText":"bearish market to buy or not to.&nbsp;","text":"bearish market to buy or not to.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/234701226549256","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":309,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9968527965,"gmtCreate":1669260979357,"gmtModify":1676538175944,"author":{"id":"3573788001234625","authorId":"3573788001234625","name":"Koalala","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e5b56f05d7e4c4896da404f0e1420ae1","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[Cry]&nbsp;","listText":"[Cry]&nbsp;","text":"[Cry]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9968527965","repostId":"2285458048","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2285458048","pubTimestamp":1669269327,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2285458048?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-11-24 13:55","market":"us","language":"en","title":"2 Monster Metaverse Stocks Down 70% and 87% to Buy on the Dip","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2285458048","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Investors have punished these two innovative tech companies, but their long-term potential remains intact.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Depending on whom you ask, the metaverse involves some form of virtual or augmented reality designed to bring users into the digital realm, where they can connect with other people for a variety of purposes, whether for leisure or for commerce.</p><p>Though the final form of this new technology is not entirely fleshed out, the estimates about its potential value are wide-ranging. Bloomberg Intelligence thinks the opportunity could be worth $800 billion by 2024, and based on an annual growth rate of 13.1%, it could double to $1.6 trillion by 2030.</p><p><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/META\">Meta Platforms</a></b> and <b>Snap</b> are two leading developers of the metaverse, and they&#39;re each approaching it from different angles. Here&#39;s why owning both might be a great bet for the long term.</p><h2>Meta&#39;s multibillion-dollar bet</h2><p>When the economy was roaring during 2021, Meta Platforms&#39; big bet on the metaverse was seen as an intriguing investment in a future technology that could change the way people connect socially and professionally. Meta stock was trading at an all-time high of $378 a little more than 12 months ago.</p><p>But in 2022, with the economy slowing and the rest of Meta&#39;s business struggling, investors have lambasted the company and its CEO, Mark Zuckerberg, for its continued spending on the project.</p><p>Meta Platforms is the parent of Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp, all of which rely on advertising to generate revenue. But given the current climate, consumers are spending less, so businesses are investing less in marketing, which has directly affected Meta&#39;s portfolio of social media platforms.</p><p>The company generated $27.7 billion in revenue during the recent third quarter (ended Sept. 30), which was a slight year-over-year decline from the $29 billion it delivered in the same period of 2021. While that&#39;s not ideal, investors are more concerned with Meta&#39;s accelerated spending in its Reality Labs segment, which is responsible for the metaverse. In the first three quarters of 2022, Reality Labs has lost $9.4 billion, and it has been a drag on the company&#39;s bottom-line results.</p><p>But it&#39;s not all bad news. Meta is still experiencing user growth across its family of apps, which now have 3.7 billion monthly active people. And the company&#39;s annual revenue for 2022 is expected to top $116 billion, which would be flat compared to 2021, though that&#39;s not necessarily a bad thing given how challenging the economy is.</p><p>Then there&#39;s the financial potential of the metaverse. Weighed against what could be a multitrillion-dollar opportunity in the long term, Meta&#39;s investment of less than $10 billion this year doesn&#39;t seem so unreasonable. Mark Zuckerberg predicts the company&#39;s mass-market virtual world could attract one billion users, who will each spend hundreds of dollars on digital goods before 2030.</p><p>Because Meta stock is down 70% from its all-time high and trades at the cheapest price-to-earnings ratio since it became a public company, this might be an opportune time to buy.</p><h2>Snap has an augmented take on the metaverse</h2><p>The beauty of a new technology like the metaverse is that companies are all working on their own innovative visions for it. Snap, which is the parent of SnapChat, doesn&#39;t see a virtual world at all, and has in fact criticized the approach taken by its rival Meta Platforms. Instead, Snap wants to fuse the digital realm with the physical one, and it&#39;s doing so with augmented reality (AR).</p><p>AR has broader applications because the user doesn&#39;t have to be fully immersed in the technology by using a headset, for example. It can be delivered on-screen using a smartphone camera, or even with special glasses Snap is designing called Spectacles. The wearers can go about their normal day while having digital enhancements beamed into their vision without ceasing interactions with other human beings in real life.</p><p>Like Meta, Snap&#39;s advertising-based business has suffered at the hands of the weak economy this year. But it&#39;s working on a series of initiatives to revive its growth trajectory, including AR-based features that are true game changers.</p><p>SnapChat users are able to try on clothes using AR through their smartphone camera, and one retailer generated 11 million impressions on the platform during the third quarter. Similarly, another store saw a 14-fold increase in its return on investment by allowing SnapChatters to explore outdoor furniture products using AR.</p><p>Therefore, setting aside any potential value created from the metaverse itself, it&#39;s clear AR could provide a significant boost to advertisers. Since Snap is a leading developer of the technology, that might be a big long-term tailwind for the company.</p><p>Snap&#39;s revenue grew by just 5.7% year over year in the third quarter -- for context, it grew 10 times faster (57%) at the same time in 2021. But on a more positive note, the company continues to experience robust growth in daily active users, which jumped 19% during the quarter to 363 million. As long as that continues, Snap&#39;s advertising revenue should bounce back strongly once the economy recovers.</p><p>Like Meta, Snap&#39;s stock decline (some 87% from its all-time high) places it near the cheapest valuation since becoming a public company, so investors might see value in building a position at these levels.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>2 Monster Metaverse Stocks Down 70% and 87% to Buy on the Dip</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n2 Monster Metaverse Stocks Down 70% and 87% to Buy on the Dip\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-11-24 13:55 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/11/23/2-monster-metaverse-stocks-down-70-and-87-buy-dip/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Depending on whom you ask, the metaverse involves some form of virtual or augmented reality designed to bring users into the digital realm, where they can connect with other people for a variety of ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/11/23/2-monster-metaverse-stocks-down-70-and-87-buy-dip/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SNAP":"Snap Inc","META":"Meta Platforms"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/11/23/2-monster-metaverse-stocks-down-70-and-87-buy-dip/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2285458048","content_text":"Depending on whom you ask, the metaverse involves some form of virtual or augmented reality designed to bring users into the digital realm, where they can connect with other people for a variety of purposes, whether for leisure or for commerce.Though the final form of this new technology is not entirely fleshed out, the estimates about its potential value are wide-ranging. Bloomberg Intelligence thinks the opportunity could be worth $800 billion by 2024, and based on an annual growth rate of 13.1%, it could double to $1.6 trillion by 2030.Meta Platforms and Snap are two leading developers of the metaverse, and they're each approaching it from different angles. Here's why owning both might be a great bet for the long term.Meta's multibillion-dollar betWhen the economy was roaring during 2021, Meta Platforms' big bet on the metaverse was seen as an intriguing investment in a future technology that could change the way people connect socially and professionally. Meta stock was trading at an all-time high of $378 a little more than 12 months ago.But in 2022, with the economy slowing and the rest of Meta's business struggling, investors have lambasted the company and its CEO, Mark Zuckerberg, for its continued spending on the project.Meta Platforms is the parent of Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp, all of which rely on advertising to generate revenue. But given the current climate, consumers are spending less, so businesses are investing less in marketing, which has directly affected Meta's portfolio of social media platforms.The company generated $27.7 billion in revenue during the recent third quarter (ended Sept. 30), which was a slight year-over-year decline from the $29 billion it delivered in the same period of 2021. While that's not ideal, investors are more concerned with Meta's accelerated spending in its Reality Labs segment, which is responsible for the metaverse. In the first three quarters of 2022, Reality Labs has lost $9.4 billion, and it has been a drag on the company's bottom-line results.But it's not all bad news. Meta is still experiencing user growth across its family of apps, which now have 3.7 billion monthly active people. And the company's annual revenue for 2022 is expected to top $116 billion, which would be flat compared to 2021, though that's not necessarily a bad thing given how challenging the economy is.Then there's the financial potential of the metaverse. Weighed against what could be a multitrillion-dollar opportunity in the long term, Meta's investment of less than $10 billion this year doesn't seem so unreasonable. Mark Zuckerberg predicts the company's mass-market virtual world could attract one billion users, who will each spend hundreds of dollars on digital goods before 2030.Because Meta stock is down 70% from its all-time high and trades at the cheapest price-to-earnings ratio since it became a public company, this might be an opportune time to buy.Snap has an augmented take on the metaverseThe beauty of a new technology like the metaverse is that companies are all working on their own innovative visions for it. Snap, which is the parent of SnapChat, doesn't see a virtual world at all, and has in fact criticized the approach taken by its rival Meta Platforms. Instead, Snap wants to fuse the digital realm with the physical one, and it's doing so with augmented reality (AR).AR has broader applications because the user doesn't have to be fully immersed in the technology by using a headset, for example. It can be delivered on-screen using a smartphone camera, or even with special glasses Snap is designing called Spectacles. The wearers can go about their normal day while having digital enhancements beamed into their vision without ceasing interactions with other human beings in real life.Like Meta, Snap's advertising-based business has suffered at the hands of the weak economy this year. But it's working on a series of initiatives to revive its growth trajectory, including AR-based features that are true game changers.SnapChat users are able to try on clothes using AR through their smartphone camera, and one retailer generated 11 million impressions on the platform during the third quarter. Similarly, another store saw a 14-fold increase in its return on investment by allowing SnapChatters to explore outdoor furniture products using AR.Therefore, setting aside any potential value created from the metaverse itself, it's clear AR could provide a significant boost to advertisers. Since Snap is a leading developer of the technology, that might be a big long-term tailwind for the company.Snap's revenue grew by just 5.7% year over year in the third quarter -- for context, it grew 10 times faster (57%) at the same time in 2021. But on a more positive note, the company continues to experience robust growth in daily active users, which jumped 19% during the quarter to 363 million. As long as that continues, Snap's advertising revenue should bounce back strongly once the economy recovers.Like Meta, Snap's stock decline (some 87% from its all-time high) places it near the cheapest valuation since becoming a public company, so investors might see value in building a position at these levels.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":168,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9985629661,"gmtCreate":1667378416953,"gmtModify":1676537907930,"author":{"id":"3573788001234625","authorId":"3573788001234625","name":"Koalala","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e5b56f05d7e4c4896da404f0e1420ae1","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[Cry]&nbsp;","listText":"[Cry]&nbsp;","text":"[Cry]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9985629661","repostId":"2280317869","repostType":2,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":241,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9988817739,"gmtCreate":1666731503921,"gmtModify":1676537795273,"author":{"id":"3573788001234625","authorId":"3573788001234625","name":"Koalala","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e5b56f05d7e4c4896da404f0e1420ae1","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[Cool]&nbsp;","listText":"[Cool]&nbsp;","text":"[Cool]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9988817739","repostId":"2277203900","repostType":2,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":296,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9983781432,"gmtCreate":1666319504927,"gmtModify":1676537740654,"author":{"id":"3573788001234625","authorId":"3573788001234625","name":"Koalala","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e5b56f05d7e4c4896da404f0e1420ae1","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[Cry]&nbsp;","listText":"[Cry]&nbsp;","text":"[Cry]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9983781432","repostId":"1199718156","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1199718156","pubTimestamp":1666317015,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1199718156?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-10-21 09:50","market":"sg","language":"en","title":"5 Reliable Singapore REITs Delivering a Distribution Yield of 5.8% or More","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1199718156","media":"The Smart Investor","summary":"The REIT universe offers an impressive variety of REITs to suit almost any investor’s palate.But if ","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>The REIT universe offers an impressive variety of REITs to suit almost any investor’s palate.</p><p>But if you’re looking for REITs that offer reliability and certainty, it’s good to stick with recognisable names that come with a strong sponsor.</p><p>It also helps if the REIT has a great track record of paying out consistent distributions in the past.</p><p>With the recent sell-down in the REIT space, many attractive bargains have emerged.</p><p>Here are five reliable names that are offering a distribution yield exceeding 5.7%.</p><p><b>Mapletree Logistics Trust (SGX: M44U)</b></p><p>Mapletree Logistics Trust, or MLT, owns a portfolio of 185 properties spread out over eight countries with assets under management (AUM) of S$13 billion as of 30 June 2022.</p><p>The logistics REIT has done well and reported a strong set of numbers for its fiscal 2023’s first quarter (1Q2023).</p><p>Gross revenue rose 14.6% year on year to S$187.7 million while net property income (NPI) increased by 13.2% year on year to S$163.2 million.</p><p>Distribution per unit (DPU) was up by 5% year on year to S$0.02268.</p><p>MLT’s trailing 12-month DPU stood at S$0.08894, giving its units a trailing distribution yield of 6%.</p><p>The REIT also reported encouraging operating statistics, with a high occupancy rate of 96.8% as of 30 June 2022.</p><p>Average rental reversion for the quarter was positive 3.4% and the REIT had 80% of its debt hedged to fixed rates.</p><p><b>Frasers Logistics &amp; Commercial Trust (SGX: BUOU)</b></p><p>Frasers Logistics &amp; Commercial Trust, or FLCT, owns 105 properties with an AUM of S$6.5 billion spread out across the UK, Singapore, Australia, Germany, and the Netherlands.</p><p>The REIT announced a respectable set of earnings for its fiscal 2022’s first half (1H2022) ending 31 March 2022.</p><p>Revenue inched up 1.7% year on year to S$235.7 million while adjusted NPI rose 3.6% year on year to S$180.1 million.</p><p>DPU edged up 1.3% year on year to S$0.0385.</p><p>Coupled with 2H2021’s DPU of S$0.0388, FLCT’s trailing 12-month DPU came in at S$0.0773, giving its units a trailing distribution yield of 7%.</p><p>The REIT enjoys a low gearing of just 29.2% with 80.6% of its borrowings on fixed rates, thus mitigating against a sharp rise in borrowing costs arising from higher interest rates.</p><p><b>CapitaLand Ascendas REIT (SGX: A17U)</b></p><p>CapitaLand Ascendas REIT, or CLAS, is an industrial REIT that owns a portfolio of 227 properties in Singapore, the US, Australia, and the UK/Europe.</p><p>AUM stood at S$16.6 billion as of 30 June 2022.</p><p>For the REIT’s 1H2022, gross revenue increased 13.7% year on year to S$666.5 million with NPI rising by 7% year on year to S$476.9 million.</p><p>DPU inched up 2.8% year on year to S$0.07873.</p><p>CLAS’ 2H2021 DPU came in at S$0.07598, and the REIT’s trailing 12-month DPU stood at S$0.15471.</p><p>Its units offer a trailing 12-month distribution yield of 6%.</p><p>The REIT maintains a healthy balance sheet with gearing at 36.7% and has 80% of its debt on fixed rates.</p><p><b>CapitaLand Integrated Commercial Trust (SGX: C38U)</b></p><p>CapitaLand Integrated Commercial Trust, or CICT, is a retail and commercial REIT that owns 21 properties in Singapore, two in Germany, and three in Australia.</p><p>Total AUM stood at S$24.2 billion as of 31 December 2021.</p><p>For 1H2022, CICT saw its gross revenue rise 6.5% year on year to S$687.6 million with NPI improving by 6.2% year on year to S$501.6 million.</p><p>The REIT’s trailing 12-month DPU came in at S$0.1044, giving its units a trailing distribution yield of 5.8%.</p><p>CICT’s aggregate leverage stood at 40.6% as of 30 June 2022 with 81% of its borrowings on fixed rates. Its average cost of debt remained low at just 2.4%.</p><p><b>Keppel DC REIT (SGX: AJBU)</b></p><p>Keppel DC REIT owns a portfolio of 21 data centres across nine countries with an AUM of S$3.5 billion as of 30 June 2022.</p><p>The REIT reported a good set of earnings for 1H2022, with gross revenue inching up 0.3% year on year to S$135.5 million and distributable income jumping 8.2% year on year to S$91.1 million.</p><p>DPU crept up 2.5% year on year to S$0.05049.</p><p>For 2H2021, DPU came in at S$0.04927, giving Keppel DC REIT a trailing 12-month DPU of S$0.09976.</p><p>At a unit price of S$1.60, the trailing distribution yield stands at 6%.</p><p>The REIT had aggregate leverage of 35.3% as of 30 June with a low average cost of debt of 1.9%.</p><p>Around 76% of the REIT’s borrowings are in fixed rates.</p></body></html>","source":"lsy1602567310727","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>5 Reliable Singapore REITs Delivering a Distribution Yield of 5.8% or More</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n5 Reliable Singapore REITs Delivering a Distribution Yield of 5.8% or More\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-10-21 09:50 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://thesmartinvestor.com.sg/5-reliable-singapore-reits-delivering-a-distribution-yield-of-5-8-or-more/><strong>The Smart Investor</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The REIT universe offers an impressive variety of REITs to suit almost any investor’s palate.But if you’re looking for REITs that offer reliability and certainty, it’s good to stick with recognisable ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://thesmartinvestor.com.sg/5-reliable-singapore-reits-delivering-a-distribution-yield-of-5-8-or-more/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BUOU.SI":"星狮物流工业信托","A17U.SI":"凯德腾飞房产信托","C38U.SI":"凯德商用新加坡信托","M44U.SI":"丰树物流信托","AJBU.SI":"吉宝数据中心房地产信托"},"source_url":"https://thesmartinvestor.com.sg/5-reliable-singapore-reits-delivering-a-distribution-yield-of-5-8-or-more/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1199718156","content_text":"The REIT universe offers an impressive variety of REITs to suit almost any investor’s palate.But if you’re looking for REITs that offer reliability and certainty, it’s good to stick with recognisable names that come with a strong sponsor.It also helps if the REIT has a great track record of paying out consistent distributions in the past.With the recent sell-down in the REIT space, many attractive bargains have emerged.Here are five reliable names that are offering a distribution yield exceeding 5.7%.Mapletree Logistics Trust (SGX: M44U)Mapletree Logistics Trust, or MLT, owns a portfolio of 185 properties spread out over eight countries with assets under management (AUM) of S$13 billion as of 30 June 2022.The logistics REIT has done well and reported a strong set of numbers for its fiscal 2023’s first quarter (1Q2023).Gross revenue rose 14.6% year on year to S$187.7 million while net property income (NPI) increased by 13.2% year on year to S$163.2 million.Distribution per unit (DPU) was up by 5% year on year to S$0.02268.MLT’s trailing 12-month DPU stood at S$0.08894, giving its units a trailing distribution yield of 6%.The REIT also reported encouraging operating statistics, with a high occupancy rate of 96.8% as of 30 June 2022.Average rental reversion for the quarter was positive 3.4% and the REIT had 80% of its debt hedged to fixed rates.Frasers Logistics & Commercial Trust (SGX: BUOU)Frasers Logistics & Commercial Trust, or FLCT, owns 105 properties with an AUM of S$6.5 billion spread out across the UK, Singapore, Australia, Germany, and the Netherlands.The REIT announced a respectable set of earnings for its fiscal 2022’s first half (1H2022) ending 31 March 2022.Revenue inched up 1.7% year on year to S$235.7 million while adjusted NPI rose 3.6% year on year to S$180.1 million.DPU edged up 1.3% year on year to S$0.0385.Coupled with 2H2021’s DPU of S$0.0388, FLCT’s trailing 12-month DPU came in at S$0.0773, giving its units a trailing distribution yield of 7%.The REIT enjoys a low gearing of just 29.2% with 80.6% of its borrowings on fixed rates, thus mitigating against a sharp rise in borrowing costs arising from higher interest rates.CapitaLand Ascendas REIT (SGX: A17U)CapitaLand Ascendas REIT, or CLAS, is an industrial REIT that owns a portfolio of 227 properties in Singapore, the US, Australia, and the UK/Europe.AUM stood at S$16.6 billion as of 30 June 2022.For the REIT’s 1H2022, gross revenue increased 13.7% year on year to S$666.5 million with NPI rising by 7% year on year to S$476.9 million.DPU inched up 2.8% year on year to S$0.07873.CLAS’ 2H2021 DPU came in at S$0.07598, and the REIT’s trailing 12-month DPU stood at S$0.15471.Its units offer a trailing 12-month distribution yield of 6%.The REIT maintains a healthy balance sheet with gearing at 36.7% and has 80% of its debt on fixed rates.CapitaLand Integrated Commercial Trust (SGX: C38U)CapitaLand Integrated Commercial Trust, or CICT, is a retail and commercial REIT that owns 21 properties in Singapore, two in Germany, and three in Australia.Total AUM stood at S$24.2 billion as of 31 December 2021.For 1H2022, CICT saw its gross revenue rise 6.5% year on year to S$687.6 million with NPI improving by 6.2% year on year to S$501.6 million.The REIT’s trailing 12-month DPU came in at S$0.1044, giving its units a trailing distribution yield of 5.8%.CICT’s aggregate leverage stood at 40.6% as of 30 June 2022 with 81% of its borrowings on fixed rates. Its average cost of debt remained low at just 2.4%.Keppel DC REIT (SGX: AJBU)Keppel DC REIT owns a portfolio of 21 data centres across nine countries with an AUM of S$3.5 billion as of 30 June 2022.The REIT reported a good set of earnings for 1H2022, with gross revenue inching up 0.3% year on year to S$135.5 million and distributable income jumping 8.2% year on year to S$91.1 million.DPU crept up 2.5% year on year to S$0.05049.For 2H2021, DPU came in at S$0.04927, giving Keppel DC REIT a trailing 12-month DPU of S$0.09976.At a unit price of S$1.60, the trailing distribution yield stands at 6%.The REIT had aggregate leverage of 35.3% as of 30 June with a low average cost of debt of 1.9%.Around 76% of the REIT’s borrowings are in fixed rates.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":271,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9980723665,"gmtCreate":1665820130257,"gmtModify":1676537669634,"author":{"id":"3573788001234625","authorId":"3573788001234625","name":"Koalala","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e5b56f05d7e4c4896da404f0e1420ae1","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[Cry]&nbsp;","listText":"[Cry]&nbsp;","text":"[Cry]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9980723665","repostId":"2275952060","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2275952060","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1665788512,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2275952060?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-10-15 07:01","market":"us","language":"en","title":"US STOCKS-Wall St Drops As Consumer Data Stokes Inflation Worry","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2275952060","media":"Reuters","summary":"* JPM reports higher-than-expected Q3 profit* S&P 500, Nasdaq post weekly declines* U.S. consumer se","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>* JPM reports higher-than-expected Q3 profit</p><p>* S&amp;P 500, Nasdaq post weekly declines</p><p>* U.S. consumer sentiment edges up October; inflation ests. worsen</p><p>* Dow down 1.34%, S&amp;P 500 down 2.37%, Nasdaq down 3.08%</p><p>NEW YORK, Oct 14 (Reuters) - U.S. stocks dropped on Friday as worsening inflation expectations kept intact worries that the Federal Reserve&#39;s aggressive rate hike path could trigger a recession, while investors digested the early stages of earnings season.</p><p>In the last session of a volatile week, equities opened higher, then reversed course after data from the University of Michigan showed consumer sentiment improved in October but inflation expectations worsened as gasoline prices moved higher. Retail sales data also indicated resilience among consumers.</p><p>&#34;The main thrust for the market right now is higher interest rates, higher inflation and the Fed is going to continue to move its fed funds target higher,&#34; said Anthony Saglimbene, chief market strategist at Ameriprise Financial in Troy, Michigan.</p><p>&#34;The narrative that we’ve seen peak inflation is not evident yet and that’s depressing the market.&#34;</p><p>On Thursday, a reading on consumer prices (CPI) showed inflation remained stubbornly high.</p><p>Fed officials have been largely in sync when commenting on the need to raise rates and St. Louis Fed President James Bullard said in a Reuters interview the recent CPI data warrants a continued &#34;frontloading&#34; through larger three-quarter-percentage point steps, although that does not necessarily mean rates need to be raised above the central bank&#39;s most recent projections.</p><p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 403.89 points, or 1.34%, to 29,634.83, the S&amp;P 500 lost 86.84 points, or 2.37%, to 3,583.07 and the Nasdaq Composite dropped 327.76 points, or 3.08%, to 10,321.39.</p><p>Friday&#39;s decline marked the 37th time the S&amp;P 500 recorded a gain or loss of at least 2% compared with only seven such session in all of 2021. For the week, the Dow gained 1.15%, the S&amp;P 500 lost 1.56% and the Nasdaq fell 3.11%.</p><p>Corporate earnings season started to pick up steam and helped the bank index, which posted a narrow 0.03% gain after quarterly results from JPMorgan Chase &amp; Co, up 1.66%, Citigroup Inc, up 0.65%, and Wells Fargo &amp; Co, up 1.86%, boosted the shares of each.</p><p>&#34;The message I got from them is things are looking pretty good from an economic perspective despite the challenges but they increased loan-loss reserves just in anticipation that you are going to see some more slowing,&#34; said Brian Jacobsen, senior investment strategist at Allspring Global Investments in Menomonee Falls, Wisconsin.</p><p>UnitedHealth gained 0.63% as one of only three Dow components to move higher on the day after the health insurer posted better-than-expected quarterly results while raising its annual forecast.</p><p>Analysts now expect third-quarter profits for S&amp;P 500 companies to have risen just 3.6% from a year ago, much lower than an 11.1% increase expected at the start of July, according to Refinitiv data.</p><p>Kroger Co shares dropped 7.32% after the supermarket chain said it would buy smaller rival Albertsons Companies Inc in a $24.6 billion deal.</p><p>Tesla Inc slumped 7.55% following media reports that the electric vehicle maker has put on hold plans to launch battery cell production at its plant outside Berlin due to technical issues.</p><p>Volume on U.S. exchanges was 10.88 billion shares, compared with the 11.48 billion average for the full session over the last 20 trading days.</p><p>Declining issues outnumbered advancing ones on the NYSE by a 4.20-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 2.87-to-1 ratio favored decliners.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 posted 5 new 52-week highs and 7 new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 71 new highs and 235 new lows.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>US STOCKS-Wall St Drops As Consumer Data Stokes Inflation Worry</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nUS STOCKS-Wall St Drops As Consumer Data Stokes Inflation Worry\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-10-15 07:01</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>* JPM reports higher-than-expected Q3 profit</p><p>* S&amp;P 500, Nasdaq post weekly declines</p><p>* U.S. consumer sentiment edges up October; inflation ests. worsen</p><p>* Dow down 1.34%, S&amp;P 500 down 2.37%, Nasdaq down 3.08%</p><p>NEW YORK, Oct 14 (Reuters) - U.S. stocks dropped on Friday as worsening inflation expectations kept intact worries that the Federal Reserve&#39;s aggressive rate hike path could trigger a recession, while investors digested the early stages of earnings season.</p><p>In the last session of a volatile week, equities opened higher, then reversed course after data from the University of Michigan showed consumer sentiment improved in October but inflation expectations worsened as gasoline prices moved higher. Retail sales data also indicated resilience among consumers.</p><p>&#34;The main thrust for the market right now is higher interest rates, higher inflation and the Fed is going to continue to move its fed funds target higher,&#34; said Anthony Saglimbene, chief market strategist at Ameriprise Financial in Troy, Michigan.</p><p>&#34;The narrative that we’ve seen peak inflation is not evident yet and that’s depressing the market.&#34;</p><p>On Thursday, a reading on consumer prices (CPI) showed inflation remained stubbornly high.</p><p>Fed officials have been largely in sync when commenting on the need to raise rates and St. Louis Fed President James Bullard said in a Reuters interview the recent CPI data warrants a continued &#34;frontloading&#34; through larger three-quarter-percentage point steps, although that does not necessarily mean rates need to be raised above the central bank&#39;s most recent projections.</p><p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 403.89 points, or 1.34%, to 29,634.83, the S&amp;P 500 lost 86.84 points, or 2.37%, to 3,583.07 and the Nasdaq Composite dropped 327.76 points, or 3.08%, to 10,321.39.</p><p>Friday&#39;s decline marked the 37th time the S&amp;P 500 recorded a gain or loss of at least 2% compared with only seven such session in all of 2021. For the week, the Dow gained 1.15%, the S&amp;P 500 lost 1.56% and the Nasdaq fell 3.11%.</p><p>Corporate earnings season started to pick up steam and helped the bank index, which posted a narrow 0.03% gain after quarterly results from JPMorgan Chase &amp; Co, up 1.66%, Citigroup Inc, up 0.65%, and Wells Fargo &amp; Co, up 1.86%, boosted the shares of each.</p><p>&#34;The message I got from them is things are looking pretty good from an economic perspective despite the challenges but they increased loan-loss reserves just in anticipation that you are going to see some more slowing,&#34; said Brian Jacobsen, senior investment strategist at Allspring Global Investments in Menomonee Falls, Wisconsin.</p><p>UnitedHealth gained 0.63% as one of only three Dow components to move higher on the day after the health insurer posted better-than-expected quarterly results while raising its annual forecast.</p><p>Analysts now expect third-quarter profits for S&amp;P 500 companies to have risen just 3.6% from a year ago, much lower than an 11.1% increase expected at the start of July, according to Refinitiv data.</p><p>Kroger Co shares dropped 7.32% after the supermarket chain said it would buy smaller rival Albertsons Companies Inc in a $24.6 billion deal.</p><p>Tesla Inc slumped 7.55% following media reports that the electric vehicle maker has put on hold plans to launch battery cell production at its plant outside Berlin due to technical issues.</p><p>Volume on U.S. exchanges was 10.88 billion shares, compared with the 11.48 billion average for the full session over the last 20 trading days.</p><p>Declining issues outnumbered advancing ones on the NYSE by a 4.20-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 2.87-to-1 ratio favored decliners.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 posted 5 new 52-week highs and 7 new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 71 new highs and 235 new lows.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"UNH":"联合健康",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite","C":"花旗",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯","WFC":"富国银行","TSLA":"特斯拉","JPM":"摩根大通","KR":"克罗格"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2275952060","content_text":"* JPM reports higher-than-expected Q3 profit* S&P 500, Nasdaq post weekly declines* U.S. consumer sentiment edges up October; inflation ests. worsen* Dow down 1.34%, S&P 500 down 2.37%, Nasdaq down 3.08%NEW YORK, Oct 14 (Reuters) - U.S. stocks dropped on Friday as worsening inflation expectations kept intact worries that the Federal Reserve's aggressive rate hike path could trigger a recession, while investors digested the early stages of earnings season.In the last session of a volatile week, equities opened higher, then reversed course after data from the University of Michigan showed consumer sentiment improved in October but inflation expectations worsened as gasoline prices moved higher. Retail sales data also indicated resilience among consumers.\"The main thrust for the market right now is higher interest rates, higher inflation and the Fed is going to continue to move its fed funds target higher,\" said Anthony Saglimbene, chief market strategist at Ameriprise Financial in Troy, Michigan.\"The narrative that we’ve seen peak inflation is not evident yet and that’s depressing the market.\"On Thursday, a reading on consumer prices (CPI) showed inflation remained stubbornly high.Fed officials have been largely in sync when commenting on the need to raise rates and St. Louis Fed President James Bullard said in a Reuters interview the recent CPI data warrants a continued \"frontloading\" through larger three-quarter-percentage point steps, although that does not necessarily mean rates need to be raised above the central bank's most recent projections.The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 403.89 points, or 1.34%, to 29,634.83, the S&P 500 lost 86.84 points, or 2.37%, to 3,583.07 and the Nasdaq Composite dropped 327.76 points, or 3.08%, to 10,321.39.Friday's decline marked the 37th time the S&P 500 recorded a gain or loss of at least 2% compared with only seven such session in all of 2021. For the week, the Dow gained 1.15%, the S&P 500 lost 1.56% and the Nasdaq fell 3.11%.Corporate earnings season started to pick up steam and helped the bank index, which posted a narrow 0.03% gain after quarterly results from JPMorgan Chase & Co, up 1.66%, Citigroup Inc, up 0.65%, and Wells Fargo & Co, up 1.86%, boosted the shares of each.\"The message I got from them is things are looking pretty good from an economic perspective despite the challenges but they increased loan-loss reserves just in anticipation that you are going to see some more slowing,\" said Brian Jacobsen, senior investment strategist at Allspring Global Investments in Menomonee Falls, Wisconsin.UnitedHealth gained 0.63% as one of only three Dow components to move higher on the day after the health insurer posted better-than-expected quarterly results while raising its annual forecast.Analysts now expect third-quarter profits for S&P 500 companies to have risen just 3.6% from a year ago, much lower than an 11.1% increase expected at the start of July, according to Refinitiv data.Kroger Co shares dropped 7.32% after the supermarket chain said it would buy smaller rival Albertsons Companies Inc in a $24.6 billion deal.Tesla Inc slumped 7.55% following media reports that the electric vehicle maker has put on hold plans to launch battery cell production at its plant outside Berlin due to technical issues.Volume on U.S. exchanges was 10.88 billion shares, compared with the 11.48 billion average for the full session over the last 20 trading days.Declining issues outnumbered advancing ones on the NYSE by a 4.20-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 2.87-to-1 ratio favored decliners.The S&P 500 posted 5 new 52-week highs and 7 new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 71 new highs and 235 new lows.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":394,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9980682477,"gmtCreate":1665715643099,"gmtModify":1676537654298,"author":{"id":"3573788001234625","authorId":"3573788001234625","name":"Koalala","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e5b56f05d7e4c4896da404f0e1420ae1","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[Shy]&nbsp;","listText":"[Shy]&nbsp;","text":"[Shy]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9980682477","repostId":"2275490672","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2275490672","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1665695700,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2275490672?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-10-14 05:15","market":"hk","language":"en","title":"Occidental Petroleum Corp. Stock Outperforms Market On Strong Trading Day","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2275490672","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"DJ Occidental Petroleum Corp. Stock Outperforms Market On Strong Trading Day\n\n\n  This article was au","content":"<font class=\"NormalMinus1\" face=\"Arial\">\n<p>\nDJ Occidental Petroleum Corp. Stock Outperforms Market On Strong Trading Day\n</p>\n<p>\n  This article was automatically generated by MarketWatch using technology from Automated Insights. \n</p>\n<p>\n  Shares of Occidental Petroleum Corp. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/OXY\">$(OXY)$</a> rose 4.44% to $68.00 Thursday, on what proved to be an all-around favorable trading session for the stock market, with the S&amp;P 500 Index  rising 2.60% to 3,669.91 and the Dow Jones Industrial Average  rising 2.83% to 30,038.72. This was the stock's second consecutive day of gains. Occidental Petroleum Corp. closed $9.13 below its 52-week high ($77.13), which the company achieved on August 29th. \n</p>\n<p>\n  The stock demonstrated a mixed performance when compared to some of its competitors Thursday, as Exxon Mobil Corp. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/XOM\">$(XOM)$</a> rose 3.49% to $101.87, Chevron Corp. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CVX\">$(CVX)$</a> rose 4.85% to $165.28, and ConocoPhillips <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/COP\">$(COP)$</a> rose 5.54% to $122.74. Trading volume (22.5 M) remained 3.7 million below its 50-day average volume of 26.3 M. \n</p>\n<p>\n  Data source: Dow Jones Market Data, FactSet. Data compiled October 13, 2022. \n</p>\n<pre>\n \n</pre>\n<p>\n  (END) Dow Jones Newswires\n</p>\n<p>\n  October 13, 2022 17:15 ET (21:15 GMT)\n</p>\n<p>\n  Copyright (c) 2022 Dow Jones &amp; Company, Inc.\n</p>\n</font>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Occidental Petroleum Corp. Stock Outperforms Market On Strong Trading Day</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nOccidental Petroleum Corp. Stock Outperforms Market On Strong Trading Day\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-10-14 05:15</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<font class=\"NormalMinus1\" face=\"Arial\">\n<p>\nDJ Occidental Petroleum Corp. Stock Outperforms Market On Strong Trading Day\n</p>\n<p>\n  This article was automatically generated by MarketWatch using technology from Automated Insights. \n</p>\n<p>\n  Shares of Occidental Petroleum Corp. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/OXY\">$(OXY)$</a> rose 4.44% to $68.00 Thursday, on what proved to be an all-around favorable trading session for the stock market, with the S&amp;P 500 Index  rising 2.60% to 3,669.91 and the Dow Jones Industrial Average  rising 2.83% to 30,038.72. This was the stock's second consecutive day of gains. Occidental Petroleum Corp. closed $9.13 below its 52-week high ($77.13), which the company achieved on August 29th. \n</p>\n<p>\n  The stock demonstrated a mixed performance when compared to some of its competitors Thursday, as Exxon Mobil Corp. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/XOM\">$(XOM)$</a> rose 3.49% to $101.87, Chevron Corp. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CVX\">$(CVX)$</a> rose 4.85% to $165.28, and ConocoPhillips <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/COP\">$(COP)$</a> rose 5.54% to $122.74. Trading volume (22.5 M) remained 3.7 million below its 50-day average volume of 26.3 M. \n</p>\n<p>\n  Data source: Dow Jones Market Data, FactSet. Data compiled October 13, 2022. \n</p>\n<pre>\n \n</pre>\n<p>\n  (END) Dow Jones Newswires\n</p>\n<p>\n  October 13, 2022 17:15 ET (21:15 GMT)\n</p>\n<p>\n  Copyright (c) 2022 Dow Jones &amp; Company, Inc.\n</p>\n</font>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"OXY":"西方石油","BK4201":"综合性石油与天然气企业"},"source_url":"http://dowjonesnews.com/newdjn/logon.aspx?AL=N","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2275490672","content_text":"DJ Occidental Petroleum Corp. Stock Outperforms Market On Strong Trading Day\n\n\n  This article was automatically generated by MarketWatch using technology from Automated Insights. \n\n\n  Shares of Occidental Petroleum Corp. $(OXY)$ rose 4.44% to $68.00 Thursday, on what proved to be an all-around favorable trading session for the stock market, with the S&P 500 Index  rising 2.60% to 3,669.91 and the Dow Jones Industrial Average  rising 2.83% to 30,038.72. This was the stock's second consecutive day of gains. Occidental Petroleum Corp. closed $9.13 below its 52-week high ($77.13), which the company achieved on August 29th. \n\n\n  The stock demonstrated a mixed performance when compared to some of its competitors Thursday, as Exxon Mobil Corp. $(XOM)$ rose 3.49% to $101.87, Chevron Corp. $(CVX)$ rose 4.85% to $165.28, and ConocoPhillips $(COP)$ rose 5.54% to $122.74. Trading volume (22.5 M) remained 3.7 million below its 50-day average volume of 26.3 M. \n\n\n  Data source: Dow Jones Market Data, FactSet. Data compiled October 13, 2022. \n\n\n \n\n\n  (END) Dow Jones Newswires\n\n\n  October 13, 2022 17:15 ET (21:15 GMT)\n\n\n  Copyright (c) 2022 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":339,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9914776615,"gmtCreate":1665374217737,"gmtModify":1676537595258,"author":{"id":"3573788001234625","authorId":"3573788001234625","name":"Koalala","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e5b56f05d7e4c4896da404f0e1420ae1","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Great ariticle, would you like to share it?","listText":"Great ariticle, would you like to share it?","text":"Great ariticle, would you like to share it?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9914776615","repostId":"9914555563","repostType":1,"repost":{"id":9914555563,"gmtCreate":1665326840652,"gmtModify":1676537587888,"author":{"id":"4110521855651232","authorId":"4110521855651232","name":"Lauritzen","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/8a7dd9e5318c30f23d30d56125adff55","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false},"themes":[],"title":"Peter Lynch’s 25 Golden Rules for Investing","htmlText":"Peter Lynch&nbsp;is an American investor, mutual fund manager, and philanthropist. As the manager of the Magellan Fund at Fidelity Investments between 1977 and 1990, Lynch averaged a 29.2% annual return, consistently more than double the S&amp;P 500 stock market index and making it the best-performing mutual fund in the world.During his 13-year tenure, assets under management increased from US$18 million to $14 billion.His most famous investment principle is, “invest in what you know,” popularizing the economic concept of “local knowledge”. Since most people tend to become experts in certain fields, applying this basic “invest in what you know” principle helps individual investors find good undervalued stocks. Lynch uses this principle as a starting point for investors. He has also often s","listText":"Peter Lynch&nbsp;is an American investor, mutual fund manager, and philanthropist. As the manager of the Magellan Fund at Fidelity Investments between 1977 and 1990, Lynch averaged a 29.2% annual return, consistently more than double the S&amp;P 500 stock market index and making it the best-performing mutual fund in the world.During his 13-year tenure, assets under management increased from US$18 million to $14 billion.His most famous investment principle is, “invest in what you know,” popularizing the economic concept of “local knowledge”. Since most people tend to become experts in certain fields, applying this basic “invest in what you know” principle helps individual investors find good undervalued stocks. Lynch uses this principle as a starting point for investors. He has also often s","text":"Peter Lynch is an American investor, mutual fund manager, and philanthropist. As the manager of the Magellan Fund at Fidelity Investments between 1977 and 1990, Lynch averaged a 29.2% annual return, consistently more than double the S&P 500 stock market index and making it the best-performing mutual fund in the world.During his 13-year tenure, assets under management increased from US$18 million to $14 billion.His most famous investment principle is, “invest in what you know,” popularizing the economic concept of “local knowledge”. Since most people tend to become experts in certain fields, applying this basic “invest in what you know” principle helps individual investors find good undervalued stocks. Lynch uses this principle as a starting point for investors. He has also often s","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/28db14740a7ea64b928bb738e45f7833","width":"-1","height":"-1"},{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/b170a69e38eb54d04ec000e1863a2b01","width":"-1","height":"-1"},{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/2668abb6f20b65f3e5aa5102004f3efa","width":"-1","height":"-1"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":2,"paper":2,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9914555563","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":0,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":5,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":218,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9915684836,"gmtCreate":1665021561625,"gmtModify":1676537545744,"author":{"id":"3573788001234625","authorId":"3573788001234625","name":"Koalala","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e5b56f05d7e4c4896da404f0e1420ae1","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[Cool]&nbsp;","listText":"[Cool]&nbsp;","text":"[Cool]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9915684836","repostId":"2273828361","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2273828361","pubTimestamp":1665108107,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2273828361?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-10-07 10:01","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Insider Buying 2022: 15 Stocks to Bet On Despite the Bear Market","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2273828361","media":"InvestorPlace","summary":"Source: ShutterstockIn October 2021, I made a big call on Longeveron (NASDAQ:LGVN) stock, a biotech ","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/11abc7bc1b026070774bd992fe8fb96d\" tg-width=\"768\" tg-height=\"432\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>Source: Shutterstock</p><p>In October 2021, I made a big call on <b>Longeveron</b> (NASDAQ:<b>LGVN</b>) stock, a biotech firm working on a promising Alzheimer’s therapy.</p><p>Within six weeks, shares had risen over 11x… a stunning 1,000% return!</p><p>My secret?</p><p>I noticed that the biotech’s CFO was quietly buying shares in the company.</p><p>“With clinical results due within the next month, Longeveron’s executives are likely using their knowledge of the Aging Frailty study to predict a strong outcome in the Alzheimer’s trial.”</p><p>Just a month later, the company would announce some unexpectedly good news: The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Longeveron’s Lomecel-B for use!</p><h2>The Secret to Finding 1,000% Winners</h2><p>It turns out that Longeveron’s management aren’t the only ones who are suspiciously good at timing their company’s stock.</p><p>A study by MIT researchers found that insider transactions in the U.S. would have turned $10,000 into $156,000 over their study period, compared to around $50,300 in the <b>S&amp;P 500</b>.</p><p>That’s because insiders often act on privileged information, both knowingly and unknowingly. If sales figures are doing well… or patients are responding well to clinical trials… they don’t need the “official” SEC filings to decide to buy.</p><p>Some call it a total scam.</p><p>And I get it. SEC rules around insider transactions are surprisingly lax; if a CEO sees a new product performing well or is on the cusp of making a massive deal, it’s often entirely legal to trade on that information. In 2018, <b>Tesla</b> (NASDAQ:<b>TSLA</b>) CEO Elon Musk bought $25 million of his company’s shares while details of a massive $2 billion capital raise were still under wraps.</p><p>TSLA shares would rise 206% within a year.</p><p>But as I’ve long said, <b>if you can’t beat ’em, you might as well join</b>. If the world’s richest man generated an extra $75 million along the way by using privileged information, isn’t it fair to follow his steps?</p><p>It’s a strategy I’ve called the <b>Insider Track</b>.</p><h2>The Best Time to Buy… Is in a Bear Market</h2><p>The Insider Track strategy has provenly strong results. Since January 2009, C-Suite buying has generated an annualized return of 20.8%, according to tracking site TipRanks. And in the past week alone, insiders have snapped up $45 million of their corporate shares.</p><p>These amounts are admittedly smaller than in previous declines. In May 2020, insiders bought a stunning $161 million of shares after the Covid-19 slump. And today, many sectors are doing worse than in 2020 because of higher inflation and rising rates.</p><p>But some American businesses are still humming along. Here are 15 stocks where insiders act as if they know something the market doesn’t.</p><h2>Top Market Timers</h2><p>One of the best <b>Insider Track</b> strategies involves mimicking the trades of particularly successful insiders. These are investment firms, CEOs and company owners that have an unusual ability to buy the dips.</p><p><b>B. Riley Financial</b>. The boutique investment bank has a strong track record in trading the companies it owns.</p><ul><li><b>Lazydays Holdings</b> (NASDAQ:<b>LAZY</b>). In July, the investment bank bought over 10,000 LAZY shares in the $12 range before the CEO announced “remarkable performance” figures. Shares would jump to $17.50. Recent market wobbles have sent LAZY back to the $12 range – an opportunity B. Riley has used to add another 20,000 shares.</li></ul><p><b>Opaleye LLC</b>. Opaleye LLC has a notable record of picking biotech winners. A $16 million investment in <b>Travere Therapeutics</b> (NASDAQ:<b>TVTX</b>) in 2014 is now worth almost $50 million, and a smaller investment in <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/OCUL\">Ocular Therapeutix</a></b> (NASDAQ:<b>OCUL</b>) netted an even more significant 400% return in 2020. Now, the company has added shares in:</p><ul><li><b>TELA Bio</b> (NASDAQ:<b><u>TELA</u></b>). Since June, Opaleye has snapped up shares of TELA in the $5.75 to $8.25 range in seven transactions. The commercial-stage medical tech firm produces products for soft-tissue reconstruction in hernias, plastic and reconstructive surgery. The firm has a stable business, so Opaleye is likely buying as a valuation play.</li><li><b>TRACON Pharmaceuticals</b> (NASDAQ:<b>TCON</b>). The biotech research firm is developing an oncology drug that targets the PD-L1 antibody, a known pathway under study by other large cancer research firms. The drug is now in its pivotal Phase 2 trial, giving the stock a significant upside on any good news.</li><li><b>Protara Therapeutics</b> (NASDAQ:<b>TARA</b>). The New York-based biopharma company has two development programs in its pipeline. OK-432 is designed to treat lymphatic malformations, a common disease thought to affect 1 in every 4,000 live births, and TARA-002, a treatment for bladder cancer. Opaleye’s 19,400 share addition in mid-September brings its stake to 2,575,77, a significant stake in a company with potential blockbusters in its pipeline.</li></ul><h3>Biotech Stocks</h3><p>Opaleye’s investments represent bets on biotech — some of the hardest decisions for the <b>Insider Track</b> strategy. Many of these R&amp;D firms are riding on a single drug candidate, meaning one failed trial will send the stock to zero. And as outsiders, we can’t tell the difference between opportunistic insider buying versus “pump and dumps.”</p><p><i>But biotechs are also some of the most lucrative bets, as Longeveron shows.</i></p><p>That’s because biotech executives often know clinical trial results years before the studies publish official results. If half of your patients suddenly stop developing cancers, you don’t need to be a rocket scientist (or a biotech CEO) to realize your therapy is probably outperforming the placebo in your double-blind study. These executives are also generally aware of how discussions with healthcare regulators are progressing.</p><p>That leads us to three biotech stocks where insiders have recently bought significant stakes.</p><p><b>Zivo Bioscience</b> (NASDAQ:<b>ZIVO</b>). Director Christopher Maggiore joined CEO John Payne in buying shares in the $3.50 range after shares fell from over $5. The company develops algae-based products for food-based ingredients and has a market value of under $30 million. It’s a risky bet, but Mr. Maggiore’s $25,000 share purchase suggests he knows something we don’t.</p><p><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BTTX\">Better Therapeutics</a></b> (NASDAQ:<b>BTTX</b>). The prescription digital therapeutics firm has seen a recent rash of cluster buying. The company’s CEO, CFO and a 10% owner have added $304,000 to their stakes since Sept. 12, a telling sign that the firm might have stumbled on a working therapy. Management previously indicated that its most promising candidate, BT-001, could advance pivotal trials this year or early 2023. Trades centered in the $2 range.</p><p><b>TransCode Therapeutics</b> (NASDAQ:<b>RNAZ</b>). The firm’s CEO and 10% owner added 20,000 shares on Sept. 14, raising his stake to 893,114 shares. The firm has a single therapeutic candidate, TTDX-MC138, in its pipeline designed to treat metastatic cancer. The drug is in preclinical trials, meaning that any good news could send shares up several times over.</p><h2>Insider Purchases of Public Offerings</h2><p>Public offerings are one of the best ways to understand insider sentiment. Management can spend months preparing these offerings, giving them a clear idea of the issue’s true value as Elon Musk demonstrated in his 2019 TSLA purchase.</p><p><b>Larimar Therapeutics</b> (NASDAQ:<b>LRMR</b>). The biotech’s CEO, CFO and two directors bought a combined 5.1 million shares at the firm’s public offering price of $3.15. Larimar’s lead candidate CTI-1601 is currently undergoing Phase 1 clinical trials for Friedreich’s ataxia, a rare genetic disease. Shares would jump 15.5% the following day after the FDA lifted a hold on the trial, but such broad insider purchasing often indicates more potential gains.</p><p><b>LinkBancorp</b> (NASDAQ:<b><u>LNKB</u></b>). The Pennsylvania-based bank saw 17 executives and directors buy shares in its recent $7.50 public offer – the same price it offered public investors. One director added 80,000 shares in the $7.70 range after prices jumped in first-day trading. Though outsiders won’t get a clear look into the bank’s recent merger with Gratz until next quarter, insiders seem to believe there’s no need to wait for official pro forma figures to buy at market prices.</p><h2>Cluster Buying</h2><p>Finally, corporate executives often act together in buying company shares. These are some of the most compelling <b>Insider Track</b> investments to make.</p><p><b>Macerich</b> (NYSE:<b>MAC</b>). The Santa Monica-based homebuilder saw six insiders buy 104,617 shares this week, including the company’s CEO, president, CFO, and head of leasing. The company now trades at 0.6x book value, significantly below its historical average of 1.6x.</p><p><b>Liquidia</b> (NASDAQ:<b>LQDA</b>). Shares of the biopharmaceutical company sank 37% in late August after losing a patent battle with <b>United Therapeutics</b> (NASDAQ:<b>UTHR</b>) Insiders, however, have recently bought shares in the $5.50-$6.00 range, including its CEO (45,747 shares), CFO (8000 shares), Commercial SVP (2,160 shares), COO (1,918 shares) and 10% owner <b>Caligan Partners</b> (250,000 shares).</p><p><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MFA\">MFA Financial</a></b> (NYSE:<b>MFA</b>). Between Sept. 14-15, the financial firm’s CEO, CFO, Co-CIO and a director added over 10,000 shares to their already-substantial holdings. Shares of MFA have fallen 55% this year over fears about its lending portfolio, particularly from its high exposure to residential whole loans. Insiders are buying shares as if the worries are wildly overblown.</p><p><b>B. Riley Financial</b> (NASDAQ:<b>RILY</b>). The company’s CEO Andrew Moore and director Randall Paulson joined owner Bryant Riley this week in snapping up a combined 48,400 shares in the boutique investment banking and wealth management firm. Shares currently trade at under 6x price-earnings, making it one of the cheapest investment banks by that metric.</p><p><b>Tilly’s</b> (NYSE:<b>TLYS</b>). The CFO of the youth-oriented shoe and clothing retailer joined two directors this week in buying up shares in the $6-$7 range. Tilly’s recent share slide now prices the retailer at 1.5x EV/EBITDA (enterprise value to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization), around a quarter of its usual value. Given its high operating leverage, a stronger-than-expected back-to-school season could send shares up 2x-3x from current prices.</p><p><b>L. B. Foster</b> (NASDAQ:<b>FSTR</b>). The CEO and CFO of the railroad infrastructure firm bought another 4,000 shares on Sept. 13, increasing their combined stake to over 110,000. The company trades for under 0.6x price-book, its lowest valuation since February 2016. The last time that happened, shares would recover within two months, earning investors a 60% return within two months and another 30% return within the next 10.</p><h2>Conclusion: How to Use the Insider Track</h2><p>Not all insider purchases are created equal.</p><p>Some industries like biotech, metals and mining are a treasure trove of opportunity. Executives are often aware of promising new drugs and dig sites long before the companies are required by the SEC to disclose material findings.</p><p>Following executives in other sectors comes with greater risks. Are insiders at <b>Exxon</b> (NYSE:<b>XOM</b>) buying because of an unannounced deal? Or are they blindly speculating on oil prices instead?</p><p>That’s why I tend to avoid companies like <b>HighPeak Energy</b> (NASDAQ:<b>HPK</b>), <b>U.S. Energy Corp</b> (NASDAQ:<b>USEG</b>) and <b>Stronghold Digital Mining</b> (NASDAQ:<b>SDIG</b>) — firms that also recently announced insider purchases. Shares in these firms more closely track the price of oil and <b>Bitcoin</b> (<b><u>BTC-USD</u></b>) – assets that no executive can predict.</p><p>Instead, I focus on bets with particularly opaque financials and high operating leverage. And though every investment requires deeper research before jumping in, the <b>Insider Track</b> provides us with a strong starting point to beating the markets.</p></body></html>","source":"investorplace","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Insider Buying 2022: 15 Stocks to Bet On Despite the Bear Market</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nInsider Buying 2022: 15 Stocks to Bet On Despite the Bear Market\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-10-07 10:01 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://investorplace.com/2022/10/insider-buying-2022-15-stocks-to-bet-on-despite-the-bear-market/><strong>InvestorPlace</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Source: ShutterstockIn October 2021, I made a big call on Longeveron (NASDAQ:LGVN) stock, a biotech firm working on a promising Alzheimer’s therapy.Within six weeks, shares had risen over 11x… a ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://investorplace.com/2022/10/insider-buying-2022-15-stocks-to-bet-on-despite-the-bear-market/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"ZIVO":"Zivo Bioscience, Inc.","BK4574":"无人驾驶","BK4551":"寇图资本持仓","TLYS":"Tilly’s","TVTX":"Travere Therapeutics, Inc.","BTTX":"Better Therapeutics","BK4094":"服装零售","XOM":"埃克森美孚","TARA":"ArTara Therapeutics, Inc.","BK4110":"抵押房地产投资信托","LQDA":"Liquidia Technologies Inc","BK4183":"个人用品","BK4511":"特斯拉概念","BK4099":"汽车制造商","BK4127":"投资银行业与经纪业","TSLA":"特斯拉","SDIG":"Stronghold Digital Mining, Inc","BK4539":"次新股","BK4213":"石油与天然气的勘探与生产","LRMR":"Larimar Therapeutics, Inc.","BK4023":"应用软件","BK4516":"特朗普概念","TQQQ":"纳指三倍做多ETF","PSQ":"纳指反向ETF","BK4532":"文艺复兴科技持仓","TELA":"TELA Bio, Inc.","MAC":"马塞里奇房产","BK4570":"地缘局势概念股","QLD":"纳指两倍做多ETF","RNAZ":"TransCode Therapeutics  Inc.","HPK":"Highpeak Energy Acquisition Corp","BK4214":"汽车零售","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","QQQ":"纳指100ETF","BK4139":"生物科技","SQQQ":"纳指三倍做空ETF","BK4555":"新能源车","BK4533":"AQR资本管理(全球第二大对冲基金)","RILY":"B. Riley Financial, Inc.","USEG":"美国能源","MFA":"MFA Financial","FSTR":"LB福斯特","BK4080":"零售业房地产投资信托","OCUL":"Ocular Therapeutix",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite","BK4167":"医疗保健技术","BK4527":"明星科技股","BK4198":"医疗保健用品"},"source_url":"https://investorplace.com/2022/10/insider-buying-2022-15-stocks-to-bet-on-despite-the-bear-market/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2273828361","content_text":"Source: ShutterstockIn October 2021, I made a big call on Longeveron (NASDAQ:LGVN) stock, a biotech firm working on a promising Alzheimer’s therapy.Within six weeks, shares had risen over 11x… a stunning 1,000% return!My secret?I noticed that the biotech’s CFO was quietly buying shares in the company.“With clinical results due within the next month, Longeveron’s executives are likely using their knowledge of the Aging Frailty study to predict a strong outcome in the Alzheimer’s trial.”Just a month later, the company would announce some unexpectedly good news: The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Longeveron’s Lomecel-B for use!The Secret to Finding 1,000% WinnersIt turns out that Longeveron’s management aren’t the only ones who are suspiciously good at timing their company’s stock.A study by MIT researchers found that insider transactions in the U.S. would have turned $10,000 into $156,000 over their study period, compared to around $50,300 in the S&P 500.That’s because insiders often act on privileged information, both knowingly and unknowingly. If sales figures are doing well… or patients are responding well to clinical trials… they don’t need the “official” SEC filings to decide to buy.Some call it a total scam.And I get it. SEC rules around insider transactions are surprisingly lax; if a CEO sees a new product performing well or is on the cusp of making a massive deal, it’s often entirely legal to trade on that information. In 2018, Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) CEO Elon Musk bought $25 million of his company’s shares while details of a massive $2 billion capital raise were still under wraps.TSLA shares would rise 206% within a year.But as I’ve long said, if you can’t beat ’em, you might as well join. If the world’s richest man generated an extra $75 million along the way by using privileged information, isn’t it fair to follow his steps?It’s a strategy I’ve called the Insider Track.The Best Time to Buy… Is in a Bear MarketThe Insider Track strategy has provenly strong results. Since January 2009, C-Suite buying has generated an annualized return of 20.8%, according to tracking site TipRanks. And in the past week alone, insiders have snapped up $45 million of their corporate shares.These amounts are admittedly smaller than in previous declines. In May 2020, insiders bought a stunning $161 million of shares after the Covid-19 slump. And today, many sectors are doing worse than in 2020 because of higher inflation and rising rates.But some American businesses are still humming along. Here are 15 stocks where insiders act as if they know something the market doesn’t.Top Market TimersOne of the best Insider Track strategies involves mimicking the trades of particularly successful insiders. These are investment firms, CEOs and company owners that have an unusual ability to buy the dips.B. Riley Financial. The boutique investment bank has a strong track record in trading the companies it owns.Lazydays Holdings (NASDAQ:LAZY). In July, the investment bank bought over 10,000 LAZY shares in the $12 range before the CEO announced “remarkable performance” figures. Shares would jump to $17.50. Recent market wobbles have sent LAZY back to the $12 range – an opportunity B. Riley has used to add another 20,000 shares.Opaleye LLC. Opaleye LLC has a notable record of picking biotech winners. A $16 million investment in Travere Therapeutics (NASDAQ:TVTX) in 2014 is now worth almost $50 million, and a smaller investment in Ocular Therapeutix (NASDAQ:OCUL) netted an even more significant 400% return in 2020. Now, the company has added shares in:TELA Bio (NASDAQ:TELA). Since June, Opaleye has snapped up shares of TELA in the $5.75 to $8.25 range in seven transactions. The commercial-stage medical tech firm produces products for soft-tissue reconstruction in hernias, plastic and reconstructive surgery. The firm has a stable business, so Opaleye is likely buying as a valuation play.TRACON Pharmaceuticals (NASDAQ:TCON). The biotech research firm is developing an oncology drug that targets the PD-L1 antibody, a known pathway under study by other large cancer research firms. The drug is now in its pivotal Phase 2 trial, giving the stock a significant upside on any good news.Protara Therapeutics (NASDAQ:TARA). The New York-based biopharma company has two development programs in its pipeline. OK-432 is designed to treat lymphatic malformations, a common disease thought to affect 1 in every 4,000 live births, and TARA-002, a treatment for bladder cancer. Opaleye’s 19,400 share addition in mid-September brings its stake to 2,575,77, a significant stake in a company with potential blockbusters in its pipeline.Biotech StocksOpaleye’s investments represent bets on biotech — some of the hardest decisions for the Insider Track strategy. Many of these R&D firms are riding on a single drug candidate, meaning one failed trial will send the stock to zero. And as outsiders, we can’t tell the difference between opportunistic insider buying versus “pump and dumps.”But biotechs are also some of the most lucrative bets, as Longeveron shows.That’s because biotech executives often know clinical trial results years before the studies publish official results. If half of your patients suddenly stop developing cancers, you don’t need to be a rocket scientist (or a biotech CEO) to realize your therapy is probably outperforming the placebo in your double-blind study. These executives are also generally aware of how discussions with healthcare regulators are progressing.That leads us to three biotech stocks where insiders have recently bought significant stakes.Zivo Bioscience (NASDAQ:ZIVO). Director Christopher Maggiore joined CEO John Payne in buying shares in the $3.50 range after shares fell from over $5. The company develops algae-based products for food-based ingredients and has a market value of under $30 million. It’s a risky bet, but Mr. Maggiore’s $25,000 share purchase suggests he knows something we don’t.Better Therapeutics (NASDAQ:BTTX). The prescription digital therapeutics firm has seen a recent rash of cluster buying. The company’s CEO, CFO and a 10% owner have added $304,000 to their stakes since Sept. 12, a telling sign that the firm might have stumbled on a working therapy. Management previously indicated that its most promising candidate, BT-001, could advance pivotal trials this year or early 2023. Trades centered in the $2 range.TransCode Therapeutics (NASDAQ:RNAZ). The firm’s CEO and 10% owner added 20,000 shares on Sept. 14, raising his stake to 893,114 shares. The firm has a single therapeutic candidate, TTDX-MC138, in its pipeline designed to treat metastatic cancer. The drug is in preclinical trials, meaning that any good news could send shares up several times over.Insider Purchases of Public OfferingsPublic offerings are one of the best ways to understand insider sentiment. Management can spend months preparing these offerings, giving them a clear idea of the issue’s true value as Elon Musk demonstrated in his 2019 TSLA purchase.Larimar Therapeutics (NASDAQ:LRMR). The biotech’s CEO, CFO and two directors bought a combined 5.1 million shares at the firm’s public offering price of $3.15. Larimar’s lead candidate CTI-1601 is currently undergoing Phase 1 clinical trials for Friedreich’s ataxia, a rare genetic disease. Shares would jump 15.5% the following day after the FDA lifted a hold on the trial, but such broad insider purchasing often indicates more potential gains.LinkBancorp (NASDAQ:LNKB). The Pennsylvania-based bank saw 17 executives and directors buy shares in its recent $7.50 public offer – the same price it offered public investors. One director added 80,000 shares in the $7.70 range after prices jumped in first-day trading. Though outsiders won’t get a clear look into the bank’s recent merger with Gratz until next quarter, insiders seem to believe there’s no need to wait for official pro forma figures to buy at market prices.Cluster BuyingFinally, corporate executives often act together in buying company shares. These are some of the most compelling Insider Track investments to make.Macerich (NYSE:MAC). The Santa Monica-based homebuilder saw six insiders buy 104,617 shares this week, including the company’s CEO, president, CFO, and head of leasing. The company now trades at 0.6x book value, significantly below its historical average of 1.6x.Liquidia (NASDAQ:LQDA). Shares of the biopharmaceutical company sank 37% in late August after losing a patent battle with United Therapeutics (NASDAQ:UTHR) Insiders, however, have recently bought shares in the $5.50-$6.00 range, including its CEO (45,747 shares), CFO (8000 shares), Commercial SVP (2,160 shares), COO (1,918 shares) and 10% owner Caligan Partners (250,000 shares).MFA Financial (NYSE:MFA). Between Sept. 14-15, the financial firm’s CEO, CFO, Co-CIO and a director added over 10,000 shares to their already-substantial holdings. Shares of MFA have fallen 55% this year over fears about its lending portfolio, particularly from its high exposure to residential whole loans. Insiders are buying shares as if the worries are wildly overblown.B. Riley Financial (NASDAQ:RILY). The company’s CEO Andrew Moore and director Randall Paulson joined owner Bryant Riley this week in snapping up a combined 48,400 shares in the boutique investment banking and wealth management firm. Shares currently trade at under 6x price-earnings, making it one of the cheapest investment banks by that metric.Tilly’s (NYSE:TLYS). The CFO of the youth-oriented shoe and clothing retailer joined two directors this week in buying up shares in the $6-$7 range. Tilly’s recent share slide now prices the retailer at 1.5x EV/EBITDA (enterprise value to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization), around a quarter of its usual value. Given its high operating leverage, a stronger-than-expected back-to-school season could send shares up 2x-3x from current prices.L. B. Foster (NASDAQ:FSTR). The CEO and CFO of the railroad infrastructure firm bought another 4,000 shares on Sept. 13, increasing their combined stake to over 110,000. The company trades for under 0.6x price-book, its lowest valuation since February 2016. The last time that happened, shares would recover within two months, earning investors a 60% return within two months and another 30% return within the next 10.Conclusion: How to Use the Insider TrackNot all insider purchases are created equal.Some industries like biotech, metals and mining are a treasure trove of opportunity. Executives are often aware of promising new drugs and dig sites long before the companies are required by the SEC to disclose material findings.Following executives in other sectors comes with greater risks. Are insiders at Exxon (NYSE:XOM) buying because of an unannounced deal? Or are they blindly speculating on oil prices instead?That’s why I tend to avoid companies like HighPeak Energy (NASDAQ:HPK), U.S. Energy Corp (NASDAQ:USEG) and Stronghold Digital Mining (NASDAQ:SDIG) — firms that also recently announced insider purchases. Shares in these firms more closely track the price of oil and Bitcoin (BTC-USD) – assets that no executive can predict.Instead, I focus on bets with particularly opaque financials and high operating leverage. And though every investment requires deeper research before jumping in, the Insider Track provides us with a strong starting point to beating the markets.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":256,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9913747225,"gmtCreate":1664077224967,"gmtModify":1676537387231,"author":{"id":"3573788001234625","authorId":"3573788001234625","name":"Koalala","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e5b56f05d7e4c4896da404f0e1420ae1","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[What]&nbsp;","listText":"[What]&nbsp;","text":"[What]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9913747225","repostId":"2269490734","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2269490734","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1664066508,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2269490734?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-09-25 08:41","market":"us","language":"en","title":"If You're Selling Stocks Because the Fed Is Hiking Interest Rates, You May Be Suffering From “Inflation Illusion”","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2269490734","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"Forget everything you think you know about the relationship between interest rates and the stock market.Forget everything you think you know about the relationship between interest rates and the stock","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Forget everything you think you know about the relationship between interest rates and the stock market.</p><p>Forget everything you think you know about the relationship between interest rates and the stock market. Take the notion that higher interest rates are bad for the stock market, which is almost universally believed on Wall Street. Plausible as this is, it is surprisingly difficult to support it empirically.</p><p>It would be important to challenge this notion at any time, but especially in light of the U.S. market&#39;s decline this past week following the Federal Reserve&#39;s most recent interest-rate hike announcement.</p><p>To show why higher interest rates aren&#39;t necessarily bad for equities, I compared the predictive power of the following two valuation indicators:</p><p>If higher interest rates were always bad for stocks, then the Fed Model&#39;s track record would be superior to that of the earnings yield.</p><p>It is not, as you can see from the table below. The table reports a statistic known as the r-squared, which reflects the degree to which one data series (in this case, the earnings yield or the Fed Model) predicts changes in a second series (in this case, the stock market&#39;s subsequent inflation-adjusted real return). The table reflects the U.S. stock market back to 1871, courtesy of data provided by Yale University&#39;s finance professor Robert Shiller.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/64984acf0f40a1a5e886ef773747472a\" tg-width=\"939\" tg-height=\"268\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>In other words, the ability to predict the stock market&#39;s five- and 10-year returns goes down when taking interest rates into account.</p><h3>Money illusion</h3><p>These results are so surprising that it&#39;s important to explore why the conventional wisdom is wrong. That wisdom is based on the eminently plausible argument that higher interest rates mean that future years&#39; corporate earnings must be discounted at a higher rate when calculating their present value. While that argument is not wrong, Richard Warr,  a finance professor at North Carolina State University, told me, it&#39;s only half the story.</p><p>The other half of this story is that interest rates tend to be higher when inflation is higher, and average nominal earnings tend to grow faster in higher-inflation environments. Failing to appreciate this other half of the story is a fundamental mistake in economics known as &#34;inflation illusion&#34; -- confusing nominal with real, or inflation-adjusted, values.</p><p>According to research conducted by Warr, inflation&#39;s impact on nominal earnings and the discount rate largely cancel each other out over time. While earnings tend to grow faster when inflation is higher, they must be more heavily discounted when calculating their present value.</p><p>Investors were guilty of inflation illusion when they reacted to the Fed&#39;s latest interest rate announcement by selling stocks.</p><p>None of this means that the bear market shouldn&#39;t continue, or that equities aren&#39;t overvalued. Indeed, by many measures, stocks are still overvalued, despite the much cheaper prices wrought by the bear market. The point of this discussion is that higher interest rates are not an additional reason, above and beyond the other factors affecting the stock market, why the market should fall.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>If You're Selling Stocks Because the Fed Is Hiking Interest Rates, You May Be Suffering From “Inflation Illusion”</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nIf You're Selling Stocks Because the Fed Is Hiking Interest Rates, You May Be Suffering From “Inflation Illusion”\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-09-25 08:41</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>Forget everything you think you know about the relationship between interest rates and the stock market.</p><p>Forget everything you think you know about the relationship between interest rates and the stock market. Take the notion that higher interest rates are bad for the stock market, which is almost universally believed on Wall Street. Plausible as this is, it is surprisingly difficult to support it empirically.</p><p>It would be important to challenge this notion at any time, but especially in light of the U.S. market&#39;s decline this past week following the Federal Reserve&#39;s most recent interest-rate hike announcement.</p><p>To show why higher interest rates aren&#39;t necessarily bad for equities, I compared the predictive power of the following two valuation indicators:</p><p>If higher interest rates were always bad for stocks, then the Fed Model&#39;s track record would be superior to that of the earnings yield.</p><p>It is not, as you can see from the table below. The table reports a statistic known as the r-squared, which reflects the degree to which one data series (in this case, the earnings yield or the Fed Model) predicts changes in a second series (in this case, the stock market&#39;s subsequent inflation-adjusted real return). The table reflects the U.S. stock market back to 1871, courtesy of data provided by Yale University&#39;s finance professor Robert Shiller.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/64984acf0f40a1a5e886ef773747472a\" tg-width=\"939\" tg-height=\"268\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>In other words, the ability to predict the stock market&#39;s five- and 10-year returns goes down when taking interest rates into account.</p><h3>Money illusion</h3><p>These results are so surprising that it&#39;s important to explore why the conventional wisdom is wrong. That wisdom is based on the eminently plausible argument that higher interest rates mean that future years&#39; corporate earnings must be discounted at a higher rate when calculating their present value. While that argument is not wrong, Richard Warr,  a finance professor at North Carolina State University, told me, it&#39;s only half the story.</p><p>The other half of this story is that interest rates tend to be higher when inflation is higher, and average nominal earnings tend to grow faster in higher-inflation environments. Failing to appreciate this other half of the story is a fundamental mistake in economics known as &#34;inflation illusion&#34; -- confusing nominal with real, or inflation-adjusted, values.</p><p>According to research conducted by Warr, inflation&#39;s impact on nominal earnings and the discount rate largely cancel each other out over time. While earnings tend to grow faster when inflation is higher, they must be more heavily discounted when calculating their present value.</p><p>Investors were guilty of inflation illusion when they reacted to the Fed&#39;s latest interest rate announcement by selling stocks.</p><p>None of this means that the bear market shouldn&#39;t continue, or that equities aren&#39;t overvalued. Indeed, by many measures, stocks are still overvalued, despite the much cheaper prices wrought by the bear market. The point of this discussion is that higher interest rates are not an additional reason, above and beyond the other factors affecting the stock market, why the market should fall.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2269490734","content_text":"Forget everything you think you know about the relationship between interest rates and the stock market.Forget everything you think you know about the relationship between interest rates and the stock market. Take the notion that higher interest rates are bad for the stock market, which is almost universally believed on Wall Street. Plausible as this is, it is surprisingly difficult to support it empirically.It would be important to challenge this notion at any time, but especially in light of the U.S. market's decline this past week following the Federal Reserve's most recent interest-rate hike announcement.To show why higher interest rates aren't necessarily bad for equities, I compared the predictive power of the following two valuation indicators:If higher interest rates were always bad for stocks, then the Fed Model's track record would be superior to that of the earnings yield.It is not, as you can see from the table below. The table reports a statistic known as the r-squared, which reflects the degree to which one data series (in this case, the earnings yield or the Fed Model) predicts changes in a second series (in this case, the stock market's subsequent inflation-adjusted real return). The table reflects the U.S. stock market back to 1871, courtesy of data provided by Yale University's finance professor Robert Shiller.In other words, the ability to predict the stock market's five- and 10-year returns goes down when taking interest rates into account.Money illusionThese results are so surprising that it's important to explore why the conventional wisdom is wrong. That wisdom is based on the eminently plausible argument that higher interest rates mean that future years' corporate earnings must be discounted at a higher rate when calculating their present value. While that argument is not wrong, Richard Warr,  a finance professor at North Carolina State University, told me, it's only half the story.The other half of this story is that interest rates tend to be higher when inflation is higher, and average nominal earnings tend to grow faster in higher-inflation environments. Failing to appreciate this other half of the story is a fundamental mistake in economics known as \"inflation illusion\" -- confusing nominal with real, or inflation-adjusted, values.According to research conducted by Warr, inflation's impact on nominal earnings and the discount rate largely cancel each other out over time. While earnings tend to grow faster when inflation is higher, they must be more heavily discounted when calculating their present value.Investors were guilty of inflation illusion when they reacted to the Fed's latest interest rate announcement by selling stocks.None of this means that the bear market shouldn't continue, or that equities aren't overvalued. Indeed, by many measures, stocks are still overvalued, despite the much cheaper prices wrought by the bear market. The point of this discussion is that higher interest rates are not an additional reason, above and beyond the other factors affecting the stock market, why the market should fall.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":276,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9935448985,"gmtCreate":1663127313648,"gmtModify":1676537210157,"author":{"id":"3573788001234625","authorId":"3573788001234625","name":"Koalala","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e5b56f05d7e4c4896da404f0e1420ae1","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[Cool]&nbsp;","listText":"[Cool]&nbsp;","text":"[Cool]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9935448985","repostId":"2267566005","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":285,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9936577499,"gmtCreate":1662791704811,"gmtModify":1676537142478,"author":{"id":"3573788001234625","authorId":"3573788001234625","name":"Koalala","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e5b56f05d7e4c4896da404f0e1420ae1","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[Miser]&nbsp;","listText":"[Miser]&nbsp;","text":"[Miser]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9936577499","repostId":"2266415879","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":203,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9938695453,"gmtCreate":1662598992873,"gmtModify":1676537096855,"author":{"id":"3573788001234625","authorId":"3573788001234625","name":"Koalala","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e5b56f05d7e4c4896da404f0e1420ae1","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[Cry]&nbsp;","listText":"[Cry]&nbsp;","text":"[Cry]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9938695453","repostId":"1169599277","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1169599277","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1662598551,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1169599277?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-09-08 08:55","market":"sg","language":"en","title":"Singapore Stocks to Watch: Nio, Frasers Property, Chip Eng Seng, Watches.Com","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1169599277","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"THE following companies saw new developments that may affect trading of their securities on Thursday","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>THE following companies saw new developments that may affect trading of their securities on Thursday (Sep 8):</p><p><b>Nio (NIO): </b>Higher expenses, including for research and development, weighed on the latest performance of Chinese electric carmaker Nio, with the company widening its net loss for Q2 ended June to 2.7 billion yuan (S$545 million), from 659.3 million yuan the year before.</p><p>Revenue for the quarter rose 21.8 per cent to 10.3 billion yuan, with vehicle sales up 21 per cent to 9.6 billion yuan. This came as vehicle deliveries rose 14.4 per cent to 25,059, of which 9,914 were of the ES6 model.</p><p>The increase in vehicle deliveries came despite pandemic-related challenges, said William Bin Li, Nio’s founder, chairman and CEO, in the company’s earnings statement on Wednesday (Sept 7).</p><p>Looking ahead, H2 “is a critical period for Nio to scale up the production and delivery of multiple new products”, said Li.</p><p><b>Frasers Property (TQ5):</b> NEARLY 75 per cent or 118 of Sky Eden@Bedok’s 158 residential units have been sold at an average price of about S$2,100 per square foot (psf) on the first day of the property’s launch on Wednesday (Sep 7).</p><p>Pricing for the project was earlier estimated by the developer to start from S$1,937 psf.</p><p>In a press statement on Thursday, developer Frasers Property said all 2-bedroom units of the project had been fully sold. The remaining 3-bedroom and 4-bedder units range from 1,087 square feet (sq ft) to 1,302 sq ft.</p><p><b>Chip Eng Seng (C29):</b> Property developer Chip Eng Seng on Wednesday (Sep 7) said that Celine Tang, its non-executive chairman and non-independent and non-executive director, is considering a possible transaction involving the group’s shares.</p><p>However, there is no certainty that any possible transaction will materialise at this junction, Chip Eng Seng noted in a bourse filing.</p><p>Tang, who is also group managing director of property player SingHaiyi and non-executive chairman at OKH Global, became Chip Eng Seng’s chairman in 2018 after becoming its largest shareholder. She is also the wife of Singapore property tycoon Gordon Tang.</p><p><b>Watches.com (WVJ): </b>In an update on the recent seizure of some S$30,000 worth of watches owned by Watches.com’s indirect subsidiary, CKLY Trading Limited (CTL), it was revealed that the watches were those from Michael Kors and Armani.</p><p>The 500 watches involved were also reported by Hong Kong Customs and Excise Department (C&amp;E) to have an estimated market value of HK$600,000 (S$107,477). Watches.com said the earlier S$30,000 was derived from the book value of the watches.</p><p>The value of the watches would be much higher if it was derived based on retail price, said Watches.com in a bourse filing on Wednesday (Sep 7) night.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Singapore Stocks to Watch: Nio, Frasers Property, Chip Eng Seng, Watches.Com</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSingapore Stocks to Watch: Nio, Frasers Property, Chip Eng Seng, Watches.Com\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-09-08 08:55</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>THE following companies saw new developments that may affect trading of their securities on Thursday (Sep 8):</p><p><b>Nio (NIO): </b>Higher expenses, including for research and development, weighed on the latest performance of Chinese electric carmaker Nio, with the company widening its net loss for Q2 ended June to 2.7 billion yuan (S$545 million), from 659.3 million yuan the year before.</p><p>Revenue for the quarter rose 21.8 per cent to 10.3 billion yuan, with vehicle sales up 21 per cent to 9.6 billion yuan. This came as vehicle deliveries rose 14.4 per cent to 25,059, of which 9,914 were of the ES6 model.</p><p>The increase in vehicle deliveries came despite pandemic-related challenges, said William Bin Li, Nio’s founder, chairman and CEO, in the company’s earnings statement on Wednesday (Sept 7).</p><p>Looking ahead, H2 “is a critical period for Nio to scale up the production and delivery of multiple new products”, said Li.</p><p><b>Frasers Property (TQ5):</b> NEARLY 75 per cent or 118 of Sky Eden@Bedok’s 158 residential units have been sold at an average price of about S$2,100 per square foot (psf) on the first day of the property’s launch on Wednesday (Sep 7).</p><p>Pricing for the project was earlier estimated by the developer to start from S$1,937 psf.</p><p>In a press statement on Thursday, developer Frasers Property said all 2-bedroom units of the project had been fully sold. The remaining 3-bedroom and 4-bedder units range from 1,087 square feet (sq ft) to 1,302 sq ft.</p><p><b>Chip Eng Seng (C29):</b> Property developer Chip Eng Seng on Wednesday (Sep 7) said that Celine Tang, its non-executive chairman and non-independent and non-executive director, is considering a possible transaction involving the group’s shares.</p><p>However, there is no certainty that any possible transaction will materialise at this junction, Chip Eng Seng noted in a bourse filing.</p><p>Tang, who is also group managing director of property player SingHaiyi and non-executive chairman at OKH Global, became Chip Eng Seng’s chairman in 2018 after becoming its largest shareholder. She is also the wife of Singapore property tycoon Gordon Tang.</p><p><b>Watches.com (WVJ): </b>In an update on the recent seizure of some S$30,000 worth of watches owned by Watches.com’s indirect subsidiary, CKLY Trading Limited (CTL), it was revealed that the watches were those from Michael Kors and Armani.</p><p>The 500 watches involved were also reported by Hong Kong Customs and Excise Department (C&amp;E) to have an estimated market value of HK$600,000 (S$107,477). Watches.com said the earlier S$30,000 was derived from the book value of the watches.</p><p>The value of the watches would be much higher if it was derived based on retail price, said Watches.com in a bourse filing on Wednesday (Sep 7) night.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"WVJ.SI":"Ntegrator Hldg","TQ5.SI":"星狮地产有限公司","ACV.SI":"辉盛国际信托","5I1.SI":"高鸿","NIO.SI":"蔚来"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1169599277","content_text":"THE following companies saw new developments that may affect trading of their securities on Thursday (Sep 8):Nio (NIO): Higher expenses, including for research and development, weighed on the latest performance of Chinese electric carmaker Nio, with the company widening its net loss for Q2 ended June to 2.7 billion yuan (S$545 million), from 659.3 million yuan the year before.Revenue for the quarter rose 21.8 per cent to 10.3 billion yuan, with vehicle sales up 21 per cent to 9.6 billion yuan. This came as vehicle deliveries rose 14.4 per cent to 25,059, of which 9,914 were of the ES6 model.The increase in vehicle deliveries came despite pandemic-related challenges, said William Bin Li, Nio’s founder, chairman and CEO, in the company’s earnings statement on Wednesday (Sept 7).Looking ahead, H2 “is a critical period for Nio to scale up the production and delivery of multiple new products”, said Li.Frasers Property (TQ5): NEARLY 75 per cent or 118 of Sky Eden@Bedok’s 158 residential units have been sold at an average price of about S$2,100 per square foot (psf) on the first day of the property’s launch on Wednesday (Sep 7).Pricing for the project was earlier estimated by the developer to start from S$1,937 psf.In a press statement on Thursday, developer Frasers Property said all 2-bedroom units of the project had been fully sold. The remaining 3-bedroom and 4-bedder units range from 1,087 square feet (sq ft) to 1,302 sq ft.Chip Eng Seng (C29): Property developer Chip Eng Seng on Wednesday (Sep 7) said that Celine Tang, its non-executive chairman and non-independent and non-executive director, is considering a possible transaction involving the group’s shares.However, there is no certainty that any possible transaction will materialise at this junction, Chip Eng Seng noted in a bourse filing.Tang, who is also group managing director of property player SingHaiyi and non-executive chairman at OKH Global, became Chip Eng Seng’s chairman in 2018 after becoming its largest shareholder. She is also the wife of Singapore property tycoon Gordon Tang.Watches.com (WVJ): In an update on the recent seizure of some S$30,000 worth of watches owned by Watches.com’s indirect subsidiary, CKLY Trading Limited (CTL), it was revealed that the watches were those from Michael Kors and Armani.The 500 watches involved were also reported by Hong Kong Customs and Excise Department (C&E) to have an estimated market value of HK$600,000 (S$107,477). Watches.com said the earlier S$30,000 was derived from the book value of the watches.The value of the watches would be much higher if it was derived based on retail price, said Watches.com in a bourse filing on Wednesday (Sep 7) night.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":320,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9938695538,"gmtCreate":1662598983024,"gmtModify":1676537096849,"author":{"id":"3573788001234625","authorId":"3573788001234625","name":"Koalala","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e5b56f05d7e4c4896da404f0e1420ae1","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[What]&nbsp;","listText":"[What]&nbsp;","text":"[What]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9938695538","repostId":"1119363305","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":161,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9089411335,"gmtCreate":1650019818737,"gmtModify":1676534630208,"author":{"id":"3573788001234625","authorId":"3573788001234625","name":"Koalala","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e5b56f05d7e4c4896da404f0e1420ae1","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[Cry]&nbsp;","listText":"[Cry]&nbsp;","text":"[Cry]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9089411335","repostId":"2227167900","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2227167900","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1650036302,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2227167900?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-04-15 23:25","market":"us","language":"en","title":"If Musk's $43 Billion Twitter Takeover Falls Apart, Who Else Has Enough Money to Buy the Company?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2227167900","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"Not many people have, or can secure, the funds required to acquire TwitterElon Musk has submitted a ","content":"<html><head></head><body><ul><li>Not many people have, or can secure, the funds required to acquire Twitter</li></ul><p>Elon Musk has submitted a bid to buy <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TWTR\">Twitter</a> for $43 billion. The Tesla and SpaceX CEO has been buying equity in the social-media giant throughout most of 2022, and now he says he wants to take over the company in its entirety.</p><p>&#34;Twitter has extraordinary potential,&#34; Musk said. &#34;I will unlock it.&#34;</p><p>While Twitter says it will &#34;carefully review&#34; Musk&#39;s &#34;unsolicited&#34; bid, it poses at least two hypotheticals: Who would have enough money to buy it, and who might have the interest in actually doing so?</p><p>Musk is by far the richest person in the world, with a net worth of $273 billion, and spending $43 billion on a Twitter buyout wouldn&#39;t dent his fortune excessively, even were he to go it alone and pay cash, assuming a capacity to extract liquidity from, for example, his Tesla TSLA holdings without undermining valuation.</p><p>Musk&#39;s bid is also much higher than Twitter&#39;s $36.71 billion market cap as of Thursday morning (but, as Cowen analyst John Blackledge has suggested, hardly such a rich offer that the board, from a fiduciary-duty standpoint, would have a hard time batting it away).</p><p>Using Forbes&#39; billionaires list, 29 people possess the fortune to match or exceed Musk&#39;s $43 billion offer to buy Twitter. Those names include such titans of industry as <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMZN\">Amazon&#39;s </a> Jeff Bezos and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NKE\">Nike </a> founder Phil Knight, as well as Mike Bloomberg, Mark Zuckerberg and MacKenzie Scott.</p><p>Obviously, these names are only of those who theoretically, with their Forbes-tabulated wealth, could afford to purchase Twitter at a price in the vicinity of Musk&#39;s valuation, and by no means should one infer any of them has an interest in owning the company.</p><p>The 29 billionaires on the list who could match Musk&#39;s offer also include many tech moguls. Microsoft&#39;s <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSFT\">$(MSFT)$</a> Bill Gates, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ORCL\">Oracle&#39;s </a> Larry Ellison and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GOOGL\">Google&#39;s </a>(GOOGL) Sergey Brin all have tech backgrounds and the money to buy the company.</p><p>Others on the list, like Bernard Arnault, whose vast fashion-oriented empire includes the brands Louis Vuitton and Sephora, could also in theory afford a Twitter, experience and interest in the tech industry aside.</p><p>So who among these eligible buyers might hypothetically have the most interest?</p><p>Jeff Bezos is an obvious choice. With a $181 billion fortune, he can afford it, and he already has shown an interest in owning media properties as evidenced by his purchase of the Washington Post in 2013.</p><p>Michael Bloomberg, former Democratic presidential candidate and former mayor of New York, also fits the bill. Bloomberg&#39;s net worth exceeds $82 billion, and he also has a strong interest in media properties as, famously, a founder in 1981 of the financial information and media company Bloomberg LP.</p><p>An under-the-radar name for this exercise could be Zhang Yiming. As the co-founder of ByteDance, the company that owns social-media platform TikTok, Yiming is one of China&#39;s richest people, with a net worth of $49.5 billion.</p><p>Hypothetical bids from some of these billionaires would likely raise regulatory concerns. Any takeover plans from Zuckerberg or either of the Google founders, for example, could lead to concerns of monopolistic behavior.</p><p>It&#39;s unclear at this time whether Twitter is going to be receptive to any sort of a takeover.</p><p>Twitter reportedly is holding an all-hands meeting with employees on Thursday afternoon to discuss Musk&#39;s bid for the company.</p><p>Jefferies Equity Research Analyst Brent Thill opined that it could be a company, not an individual, who looks to buy Twitter. Thill named cloud-based software company <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CRM\">Salesforce</a> and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSFT\">Microsoft</a> as possibilities, citing Microsoft&#39;s recent success with LinkedIn.</p><p>&#34;It&#39;s hard to see who the next logical player would be,&#34; he said.</p><p>Thill was also skeptical that this is truly Musk&#39;s &#34;best and final&#34; bid  for Twitter.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>If Musk's $43 Billion Twitter Takeover Falls Apart, Who Else Has Enough Money to Buy the Company?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nIf Musk's $43 Billion Twitter Takeover Falls Apart, Who Else Has Enough Money to Buy the Company?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-04-15 23:25</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><ul><li>Not many people have, or can secure, the funds required to acquire Twitter</li></ul><p>Elon Musk has submitted a bid to buy <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TWTR\">Twitter</a> for $43 billion. The Tesla and SpaceX CEO has been buying equity in the social-media giant throughout most of 2022, and now he says he wants to take over the company in its entirety.</p><p>&#34;Twitter has extraordinary potential,&#34; Musk said. &#34;I will unlock it.&#34;</p><p>While Twitter says it will &#34;carefully review&#34; Musk&#39;s &#34;unsolicited&#34; bid, it poses at least two hypotheticals: Who would have enough money to buy it, and who might have the interest in actually doing so?</p><p>Musk is by far the richest person in the world, with a net worth of $273 billion, and spending $43 billion on a Twitter buyout wouldn&#39;t dent his fortune excessively, even were he to go it alone and pay cash, assuming a capacity to extract liquidity from, for example, his Tesla TSLA holdings without undermining valuation.</p><p>Musk&#39;s bid is also much higher than Twitter&#39;s $36.71 billion market cap as of Thursday morning (but, as Cowen analyst John Blackledge has suggested, hardly such a rich offer that the board, from a fiduciary-duty standpoint, would have a hard time batting it away).</p><p>Using Forbes&#39; billionaires list, 29 people possess the fortune to match or exceed Musk&#39;s $43 billion offer to buy Twitter. Those names include such titans of industry as <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMZN\">Amazon&#39;s </a> Jeff Bezos and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NKE\">Nike </a> founder Phil Knight, as well as Mike Bloomberg, Mark Zuckerberg and MacKenzie Scott.</p><p>Obviously, these names are only of those who theoretically, with their Forbes-tabulated wealth, could afford to purchase Twitter at a price in the vicinity of Musk&#39;s valuation, and by no means should one infer any of them has an interest in owning the company.</p><p>The 29 billionaires on the list who could match Musk&#39;s offer also include many tech moguls. Microsoft&#39;s <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSFT\">$(MSFT)$</a> Bill Gates, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ORCL\">Oracle&#39;s </a> Larry Ellison and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GOOGL\">Google&#39;s </a>(GOOGL) Sergey Brin all have tech backgrounds and the money to buy the company.</p><p>Others on the list, like Bernard Arnault, whose vast fashion-oriented empire includes the brands Louis Vuitton and Sephora, could also in theory afford a Twitter, experience and interest in the tech industry aside.</p><p>So who among these eligible buyers might hypothetically have the most interest?</p><p>Jeff Bezos is an obvious choice. With a $181 billion fortune, he can afford it, and he already has shown an interest in owning media properties as evidenced by his purchase of the Washington Post in 2013.</p><p>Michael Bloomberg, former Democratic presidential candidate and former mayor of New York, also fits the bill. Bloomberg&#39;s net worth exceeds $82 billion, and he also has a strong interest in media properties as, famously, a founder in 1981 of the financial information and media company Bloomberg LP.</p><p>An under-the-radar name for this exercise could be Zhang Yiming. As the co-founder of ByteDance, the company that owns social-media platform TikTok, Yiming is one of China&#39;s richest people, with a net worth of $49.5 billion.</p><p>Hypothetical bids from some of these billionaires would likely raise regulatory concerns. Any takeover plans from Zuckerberg or either of the Google founders, for example, could lead to concerns of monopolistic behavior.</p><p>It&#39;s unclear at this time whether Twitter is going to be receptive to any sort of a takeover.</p><p>Twitter reportedly is holding an all-hands meeting with employees on Thursday afternoon to discuss Musk&#39;s bid for the company.</p><p>Jefferies Equity Research Analyst Brent Thill opined that it could be a company, not an individual, who looks to buy Twitter. Thill named cloud-based software company <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CRM\">Salesforce</a> and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSFT\">Microsoft</a> as possibilities, citing Microsoft&#39;s recent success with LinkedIn.</p><p>&#34;It&#39;s hard to see who the next logical player would be,&#34; he said.</p><p>Thill was also skeptical that this is truly Musk&#39;s &#34;best and final&#34; bid  for Twitter.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","AMZN":"亚马逊","MSFT":"微软","BK4581":"高盛持仓","BK4555":"新能源车","GOOG":"谷歌","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓","BK4548":"巴美列捷福持仓","BK4551":"寇图资本持仓","ORCL":"甲骨文","CRM":"赛富时","TWTR":"Twitter","BK4574":"无人驾驶","TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2227167900","content_text":"Not many people have, or can secure, the funds required to acquire TwitterElon Musk has submitted a bid to buy Twitter for $43 billion. The Tesla and SpaceX CEO has been buying equity in the social-media giant throughout most of 2022, and now he says he wants to take over the company in its entirety.\"Twitter has extraordinary potential,\" Musk said. \"I will unlock it.\"While Twitter says it will \"carefully review\" Musk's \"unsolicited\" bid, it poses at least two hypotheticals: Who would have enough money to buy it, and who might have the interest in actually doing so?Musk is by far the richest person in the world, with a net worth of $273 billion, and spending $43 billion on a Twitter buyout wouldn't dent his fortune excessively, even were he to go it alone and pay cash, assuming a capacity to extract liquidity from, for example, his Tesla TSLA holdings without undermining valuation.Musk's bid is also much higher than Twitter's $36.71 billion market cap as of Thursday morning (but, as Cowen analyst John Blackledge has suggested, hardly such a rich offer that the board, from a fiduciary-duty standpoint, would have a hard time batting it away).Using Forbes' billionaires list, 29 people possess the fortune to match or exceed Musk's $43 billion offer to buy Twitter. Those names include such titans of industry as Amazon's  Jeff Bezos and Nike  founder Phil Knight, as well as Mike Bloomberg, Mark Zuckerberg and MacKenzie Scott.Obviously, these names are only of those who theoretically, with their Forbes-tabulated wealth, could afford to purchase Twitter at a price in the vicinity of Musk's valuation, and by no means should one infer any of them has an interest in owning the company.The 29 billionaires on the list who could match Musk's offer also include many tech moguls. Microsoft's $(MSFT)$ Bill Gates, Oracle's  Larry Ellison and Google's (GOOGL) Sergey Brin all have tech backgrounds and the money to buy the company.Others on the list, like Bernard Arnault, whose vast fashion-oriented empire includes the brands Louis Vuitton and Sephora, could also in theory afford a Twitter, experience and interest in the tech industry aside.So who among these eligible buyers might hypothetically have the most interest?Jeff Bezos is an obvious choice. With a $181 billion fortune, he can afford it, and he already has shown an interest in owning media properties as evidenced by his purchase of the Washington Post in 2013.Michael Bloomberg, former Democratic presidential candidate and former mayor of New York, also fits the bill. Bloomberg's net worth exceeds $82 billion, and he also has a strong interest in media properties as, famously, a founder in 1981 of the financial information and media company Bloomberg LP.An under-the-radar name for this exercise could be Zhang Yiming. As the co-founder of ByteDance, the company that owns social-media platform TikTok, Yiming is one of China's richest people, with a net worth of $49.5 billion.Hypothetical bids from some of these billionaires would likely raise regulatory concerns. Any takeover plans from Zuckerberg or either of the Google founders, for example, could lead to concerns of monopolistic behavior.It's unclear at this time whether Twitter is going to be receptive to any sort of a takeover.Twitter reportedly is holding an all-hands meeting with employees on Thursday afternoon to discuss Musk's bid for the company.Jefferies Equity Research Analyst Brent Thill opined that it could be a company, not an individual, who looks to buy Twitter. Thill named cloud-based software company Salesforce and Microsoft as possibilities, citing Microsoft's recent success with LinkedIn.\"It's hard to see who the next logical player would be,\" he said.Thill was also skeptical that this is truly Musk's \"best and final\" bid  for Twitter.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":268,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9018482466,"gmtCreate":1649079554170,"gmtModify":1676534446374,"author":{"id":"3573788001234625","authorId":"3573788001234625","name":"Koalala","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e5b56f05d7e4c4896da404f0e1420ae1","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/TSLA\">$Tesla Motors(TSLA)$</a>everything is worth","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/TSLA\">$Tesla Motors(TSLA)$</a>everything is worth","text":"$Tesla Motors(TSLA)$everything is worth","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9018482466","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":202,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9095647955,"gmtCreate":1644910604612,"gmtModify":1676533974813,"author":{"id":"3573788001234625","authorId":"3573788001234625","name":"Koalala","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e5b56f05d7e4c4896da404f0e1420ae1","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[Cool]&nbsp;","listText":"[Cool]&nbsp;","text":"[Cool]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9095647955","repostId":"2211686008","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2211686008","pubTimestamp":1644908201,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2211686008?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-02-15 14:56","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Cathie Wood’s Ark Bought Sea Shares as Gaming Firm Plunged","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2211686008","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"(Bloomberg) -- Cathie Wood took advantage of a record slump in Sea Ltd., snapping up more of the gam","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>(Bloomberg) -- Cathie Wood took advantage of a record slump in <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SE\">Sea Ltd</a>., snapping up more of the gaming firm’s shares after India banned <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> of its products.</p><p>Wood’s thematic investing firm ARK Investment Management LLC bought more than 145,000 Sea shares on Monday, with the Ark Next Generation Internet ETF buying up the bulk, according to the firm’s daily trading updates compiled by Bloomberg. Sea closed down 18% in New York after India banned its marquee game Free Fire, extending a selloff in its shares to 65% from an Oct. 19 peak.</p><p>Analysts have cited a slowdown in gaming revenues, user growth and pressures on its e-commerce business among the factors weighing on Sea’s shares. India’s move to ban 54 apps due to security concerns, including Sea’s Free Fire, have only added to the headwinds.</p><p>“The ban certainly clouds Sea’s outlook a little, not just for gaming but e-commerce too,” said Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Nathan Naidu. He added that it also raised concerns about the firm’s ability to expand into new markets.</p><p>Ark has been accumulating Sea shares since the start of this year and the frequency of its purchases increased this month. Ark ETFs have bought Sea shares almost every day in February, Bloomberg-compiled data showed.</p><p>Sea -- founded in Singapore by Chinese-born founders who became Singaporean citizens -- has been growing its gaming and e-commerce business globally with early backing from Tencent Holdings Ltd., the largest shareholder of the company.</p></body></html>","source":"yahoofinance","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Cathie Wood’s Ark Bought Sea Shares as Gaming Firm Plunged</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nCathie Wood’s Ark Bought Sea Shares as Gaming Firm Plunged\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-02-15 14:56 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/cathie-wood-ark-bought-sea-045441291.html><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>(Bloomberg) -- Cathie Wood took advantage of a record slump in Sea Ltd., snapping up more of the gaming firm’s shares after India banned one of its products.Wood’s thematic investing firm ARK ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/cathie-wood-ark-bought-sea-045441291.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BK4544":"ARK ETF合集","ARKK":"ARK Innovation ETF","SE":"Sea Ltd"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/cathie-wood-ark-bought-sea-045441291.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5f26f4a48f9cb3e29be4d71d3ba8c038","article_id":"2211686008","content_text":"(Bloomberg) -- Cathie Wood took advantage of a record slump in Sea Ltd., snapping up more of the gaming firm’s shares after India banned one of its products.Wood’s thematic investing firm ARK Investment Management LLC bought more than 145,000 Sea shares on Monday, with the Ark Next Generation Internet ETF buying up the bulk, according to the firm’s daily trading updates compiled by Bloomberg. Sea closed down 18% in New York after India banned its marquee game Free Fire, extending a selloff in its shares to 65% from an Oct. 19 peak.Analysts have cited a slowdown in gaming revenues, user growth and pressures on its e-commerce business among the factors weighing on Sea’s shares. India’s move to ban 54 apps due to security concerns, including Sea’s Free Fire, have only added to the headwinds.“The ban certainly clouds Sea’s outlook a little, not just for gaming but e-commerce too,” said Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Nathan Naidu. He added that it also raised concerns about the firm’s ability to expand into new markets.Ark has been accumulating Sea shares since the start of this year and the frequency of its purchases increased this month. Ark ETFs have bought Sea shares almost every day in February, Bloomberg-compiled data showed.Sea -- founded in Singapore by Chinese-born founders who became Singaporean citizens -- has been growing its gaming and e-commerce business globally with early backing from Tencent Holdings Ltd., the largest shareholder of the company.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":228,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9098774107,"gmtCreate":1644245564093,"gmtModify":1676533903896,"author":{"id":"3573788001234625","authorId":"3573788001234625","name":"Koalala","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e5b56f05d7e4c4896da404f0e1420ae1","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[What]&nbsp;","listText":"[What]&nbsp;","text":"[What]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9098774107","repostId":"1187970199","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1187970199","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1644244867,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1187970199?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-02-07 22:41","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Hot Chinese ADRs Gained in Morning Trading","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1187970199","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"JD.com, RLX Technology, DiDi, Tencent Music, Bilibili climbed from 1% to 6%.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>JD.com, RLX Technology, DiDi, Tencent Music, Bilibili climbed from 1% to 6%.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/53b3ca4d437b7b3f0033b6f488cab646\" tg-width=\"382\" tg-height=\"642\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Hot Chinese ADRs Gained in Morning Trading</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHot Chinese ADRs Gained in Morning Trading\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-02-07 22:41</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>JD.com, RLX Technology, DiDi, Tencent Music, Bilibili climbed from 1% to 6%.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/53b3ca4d437b7b3f0033b6f488cab646\" tg-width=\"382\" tg-height=\"642\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"DIDI":"滴滴(已退市)","PDD":"拼多多","RLX":"雾芯科技"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1187970199","content_text":"JD.com, RLX Technology, DiDi, Tencent Music, Bilibili climbed from 1% to 6%.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":385,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9009419427,"gmtCreate":1640752929187,"gmtModify":1676533539263,"author":{"id":"3573788001234625","authorId":"3573788001234625","name":"Koalala","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e5b56f05d7e4c4896da404f0e1420ae1","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[Cool]&nbsp;","listText":"[Cool]&nbsp;","text":"[Cool]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9009419427","repostId":"1198739062","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1198739062","pubTimestamp":1640749914,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1198739062?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-29 11:51","market":"us","language":"en","title":"PayPal Has a Strong Story If You Look Beyond the Noise","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1198739062","media":"InvestorPlace","summary":"The last six months of 2021 have not been kind to investors in PayPal (NASDAQ:PYPL) stock.\nFrom its ","content":"<p>The last six months of 2021 have not been kind to investors in&nbsp;<b>PayPal</b>&nbsp;(NASDAQ:<b><u>PYPL</u></b>) stock.</p>\n<p>From its peak closing price of $310.16 per share, PYPL stock has dipped nearly 40%&nbsp;and now sits at $190.1.</p>\n<p>Investors have some reason to believe that PYPL stock was overvalued. For example, investors are becoming concerned that PayPal’s supremacy in digital payment solutions is being successfully eroded by competition.</p>\n<p>Also, the company’s long-anticipated breakup with&nbsp;<b>eBay</b>&nbsp;(NASDAQ:<b><u>EBAY</u></b>)reached its conclusion&nbsp;in June. This was really a case of two companies that are moving in different directions.</p>\n<p>As Dana Blankenhorn points out, PayPal is now a “fully grown banking operation.” Although the company delivered a solid first earnings report with significantly reduced eBay revenue, investors may be concerned about two consecutive quarters of slowing growth.</p>\n<p>The company is also facing questions about the consumer protections (or lack thereof) in its push into the&nbsp;buy now pay later (BNPL) arena.</p>\n<p>Specifically, the&nbsp;Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB)&nbsp;is looking&nbsp;into how PayPal and other BNPL companies may be using user data and how these companies may be getting around existing consumer protection laws.</p>\n<p>That’s a lot for investors to process. As a company still recognized as part of the technology sector, PayPal faces the same headwinds that all tech stocks are enduring.</p>\n<p>With that said, the sell-off in PayPal looks overdone. And that’s why opportunistic investors should consider PYPL stock a solid choice as they look ahead to 2022.</p>\n<p>The Business Model is Sound</p>\n<p>The biggest reason I believe that the sell-off in PayPal is overdone is that none of the issues mentioned above changes the overall narrative for PayPal. The company remains one of the unquestioned leaders in the digital payment sector. In fact, it has an enviable market penetration rate of around 75%.</p>\n<p>And, as its recent partnership with&nbsp;<b>Amazon</b>&nbsp;(NASDAQ:<b><u>AMZN</u></b>) shows, it has no problem adding clients to its roster. Specifically, starting in 2022 Amazon will offer the Venmo payment option at checkout on its webpage as well as the Amazon shopping app.</p>\n<p>Another reason to be bullish about PYPL stock can be found in the company’s financials.</p>\n<p>In the first three quarters of 2021, PayPal has reported revenue of $18.45 billion. That’s 13% higher on a year-over-year basis and puts the company well on pace to eclipse the $21.46 billion in revenue it recorded in all of FY 2020.</p>\n<p>The company is forecasting revenue to come in at $25.36 billion. And a similar story is on display with the company’s earnings which are up 17% on a year-over-year basis.</p>\n<p>Looking ahead to 2022, PayPal estimates its revenue will increase 18%. That’s slightly less than the 19% analysts were forecasting. That isn’t the growth of a struggling company.</p>\n<p>If you’re a fan of free cash flow (FCF) as a metric of financial health, you should pay attention to what Mark Hake recently wrote about how&nbsp;PayPal’s strong FCF&nbsp;makes the stock an undervalued option.</p>\n<p>PYPL Stock Is a Clear Buy-the-Dip Candidate</p>\n<p>If you don’t buy into that from a technical standpoint, consider the reaction of the analyst community. Since PayPal reported earnings, at least 20 analysts have lowered their price target for PYPL stock. However, it’s important to note that in every case the new price target is higher than the stock’s current price.</p>\n<p>As any investor knows, that&nbsp;doesn’t&nbsp;mean that PYPL stock&nbsp;doesn’t&nbsp;have further to drop. Investors will do what they want. However, it does seem that the stock has absorbed all the&nbsp;bad news.</p>\n<p>PayPal needs a bullish catalyst, and that might come when it reports earnings at the beginning of February. That’s a long winter’s night away, but it shouldn’t stop you from opening or adding to your position in PYPL stock.</p>","source":"lsy1606302653667","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>PayPal Has a Strong Story If You Look Beyond the Noise</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nPayPal Has a Strong Story If You Look Beyond the Noise\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-12-29 11:51 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://investorplace.com/2021/12/pypl-stock-looks-like-strong-buy-if-you-tune-out-noise/><strong>InvestorPlace</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The last six months of 2021 have not been kind to investors in PayPal (NASDAQ:PYPL) stock.\nFrom its peak closing price of $310.16 per share, PYPL stock has dipped nearly 40% and now sits at $190.1.\n...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://investorplace.com/2021/12/pypl-stock-looks-like-strong-buy-if-you-tune-out-noise/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"PYPL":"PayPal"},"source_url":"https://investorplace.com/2021/12/pypl-stock-looks-like-strong-buy-if-you-tune-out-noise/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1198739062","content_text":"The last six months of 2021 have not been kind to investors in PayPal (NASDAQ:PYPL) stock.\nFrom its peak closing price of $310.16 per share, PYPL stock has dipped nearly 40% and now sits at $190.1.\nInvestors have some reason to believe that PYPL stock was overvalued. For example, investors are becoming concerned that PayPal’s supremacy in digital payment solutions is being successfully eroded by competition.\nAlso, the company’s long-anticipated breakup with eBay (NASDAQ:EBAY)reached its conclusion in June. This was really a case of two companies that are moving in different directions.\nAs Dana Blankenhorn points out, PayPal is now a “fully grown banking operation.” Although the company delivered a solid first earnings report with significantly reduced eBay revenue, investors may be concerned about two consecutive quarters of slowing growth.\nThe company is also facing questions about the consumer protections (or lack thereof) in its push into the buy now pay later (BNPL) arena.\nSpecifically, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) is looking into how PayPal and other BNPL companies may be using user data and how these companies may be getting around existing consumer protection laws.\nThat’s a lot for investors to process. As a company still recognized as part of the technology sector, PayPal faces the same headwinds that all tech stocks are enduring.\nWith that said, the sell-off in PayPal looks overdone. And that’s why opportunistic investors should consider PYPL stock a solid choice as they look ahead to 2022.\nThe Business Model is Sound\nThe biggest reason I believe that the sell-off in PayPal is overdone is that none of the issues mentioned above changes the overall narrative for PayPal. The company remains one of the unquestioned leaders in the digital payment sector. In fact, it has an enviable market penetration rate of around 75%.\nAnd, as its recent partnership with Amazon (NASDAQ:AMZN) shows, it has no problem adding clients to its roster. Specifically, starting in 2022 Amazon will offer the Venmo payment option at checkout on its webpage as well as the Amazon shopping app.\nAnother reason to be bullish about PYPL stock can be found in the company’s financials.\nIn the first three quarters of 2021, PayPal has reported revenue of $18.45 billion. That’s 13% higher on a year-over-year basis and puts the company well on pace to eclipse the $21.46 billion in revenue it recorded in all of FY 2020.\nThe company is forecasting revenue to come in at $25.36 billion. And a similar story is on display with the company’s earnings which are up 17% on a year-over-year basis.\nLooking ahead to 2022, PayPal estimates its revenue will increase 18%. That’s slightly less than the 19% analysts were forecasting. That isn’t the growth of a struggling company.\nIf you’re a fan of free cash flow (FCF) as a metric of financial health, you should pay attention to what Mark Hake recently wrote about how PayPal’s strong FCF makes the stock an undervalued option.\nPYPL Stock Is a Clear Buy-the-Dip Candidate\nIf you don’t buy into that from a technical standpoint, consider the reaction of the analyst community. Since PayPal reported earnings, at least 20 analysts have lowered their price target for PYPL stock. However, it’s important to note that in every case the new price target is higher than the stock’s current price.\nAs any investor knows, that doesn’t mean that PYPL stock doesn’t have further to drop. Investors will do what they want. However, it does seem that the stock has absorbed all the bad news.\nPayPal needs a bullish catalyst, and that might come when it reports earnings at the beginning of February. That’s a long winter’s night away, but it shouldn’t stop you from opening or adding to your position in PYPL stock.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":439,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":184834775,"gmtCreate":1623704596297,"gmtModify":1704208962583,"author":{"id":"3573788001234625","authorId":"3573788001234625","name":"Koalala","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e5b56f05d7e4c4896da404f0e1420ae1","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Everything will be okay","listText":"Everything will be okay","text":"Everything will be okay","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/184834775","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":409,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":135502243,"gmtCreate":1622167733382,"gmtModify":1704180743504,"author":{"id":"3573788001234625","authorId":"3573788001234625","name":"Koalala","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e5b56f05d7e4c4896da404f0e1420ae1","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like and share&nbsp;","listText":"Like and share&nbsp;","text":"Like and share","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/135502243","repostId":"2138817953","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2138817953","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1622146740,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2138817953?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-05-28 04:19","market":"hk","language":"en","title":"Salesforce stock rises on earnings beat, hiked outlook","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2138817953","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"CEO says Salesforce on track for $50 billion in revenue for fiscal 2026.Salesforce.com Inc. shares r","content":"<blockquote>CEO says Salesforce on track for $50 billion in revenue for fiscal 2026.</blockquote><p>Salesforce.com Inc. shares rose in the extended session Thursday after the cloud-based customer-relationship management company topped Wall Street estimates and hiked its outlook for the year.</p><p>Salesforce <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CRM.AU\">$(CRM.AU)$</a> shares rose 4.41% after hours, following a 1.7% decline in the regular session to close at $225.83.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fa9adf60516f73b073f638421790ac72\" tg-width=\"662\" tg-height=\"466\"></p><p>Salesforce reported fiscal first-quarter net income of $469 million, or 50 cents a share, compared with $99 million, or 11 cents a share, in the year-ago period. Adjusted earnings were $1.21 a share, compared with 70 cents a share in the year-ago period.</p><p>Revenue rose to $5.96 billion from $4.87 billion in the year-ago quarter.</p><p>Analysts surveyed by FactSet had estimated earnings of 88 cents a share on revenue of $5.89 billion, based on Salesforce's forecast of 88 cents to 89 cents a share on revenue of $5.88 billion to $5.89 billion back in February .</p><p>\"We had the best first quarter in our company's history,\" said Marc Benioff, Salesforce chairman and chief executive, in a statement. \"We believe our Customer 360 platform is proving to be the most relevant technology for companies accelerating out of the pandemic.\"</p><p>\"We're on our path to reach $50 billion in revenue in FY26,\" Benioff added.</p><p>Salesforce expects adjusted second-quarter earnings of 91 cents to 92 cents a share on revenue of $6.22 billion to $6.23 billion, while analysts had forecast 87 cents a share on revenue of $6.17 billion.</p><p>For fiscal 2022, Salesforce forecast adjusted earnings of $3.79 to $3.81 a share on revenue of $25.9 billion to $26 billion for the year, with analysts expecting $3.44 a share on revenue of $25.75 billion. Previously, Salesforce has forecast $3.39 to $3.41 a share on revenue of $25.65 billion to $25.75 billion.</p><p>The full-year outlook includes about $500 million in revenue from the company's $27.7 billion acquisition of <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/WORK\">Slack Technologies</a> Inc. (WORK) that it announced late last year .  In a late April filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission, the company reiterated it expected to close the deal in its fiscal second quarter, or the <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE\">one</a> ending July 31.</p><p>Over the past 12 months, Salesforce shares have advanced 28%, while the <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/EEME\">iShares</a> Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/IGV.UK\">$(IGV.UK)$</a> and the S&amp;P 500 index  have both gained 38%, the tech heavy Nasdaq Composite Index  has grown 46%, and the Dow Jones Industrial Average -- which added Salesforce as a component last year  -- has risen 35%.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Salesforce stock rises on earnings beat, hiked outlook</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSalesforce stock rises on earnings beat, hiked outlook\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-05-28 04:19</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<blockquote>CEO says Salesforce on track for $50 billion in revenue for fiscal 2026.</blockquote><p>Salesforce.com Inc. shares rose in the extended session Thursday after the cloud-based customer-relationship management company topped Wall Street estimates and hiked its outlook for the year.</p><p>Salesforce <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CRM.AU\">$(CRM.AU)$</a> shares rose 4.41% after hours, following a 1.7% decline in the regular session to close at $225.83.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fa9adf60516f73b073f638421790ac72\" tg-width=\"662\" tg-height=\"466\"></p><p>Salesforce reported fiscal first-quarter net income of $469 million, or 50 cents a share, compared with $99 million, or 11 cents a share, in the year-ago period. Adjusted earnings were $1.21 a share, compared with 70 cents a share in the year-ago period.</p><p>Revenue rose to $5.96 billion from $4.87 billion in the year-ago quarter.</p><p>Analysts surveyed by FactSet had estimated earnings of 88 cents a share on revenue of $5.89 billion, based on Salesforce's forecast of 88 cents to 89 cents a share on revenue of $5.88 billion to $5.89 billion back in February .</p><p>\"We had the best first quarter in our company's history,\" said Marc Benioff, Salesforce chairman and chief executive, in a statement. \"We believe our Customer 360 platform is proving to be the most relevant technology for companies accelerating out of the pandemic.\"</p><p>\"We're on our path to reach $50 billion in revenue in FY26,\" Benioff added.</p><p>Salesforce expects adjusted second-quarter earnings of 91 cents to 92 cents a share on revenue of $6.22 billion to $6.23 billion, while analysts had forecast 87 cents a share on revenue of $6.17 billion.</p><p>For fiscal 2022, Salesforce forecast adjusted earnings of $3.79 to $3.81 a share on revenue of $25.9 billion to $26 billion for the year, with analysts expecting $3.44 a share on revenue of $25.75 billion. Previously, Salesforce has forecast $3.39 to $3.41 a share on revenue of $25.65 billion to $25.75 billion.</p><p>The full-year outlook includes about $500 million in revenue from the company's $27.7 billion acquisition of <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/WORK\">Slack Technologies</a> Inc. (WORK) that it announced late last year .  In a late April filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission, the company reiterated it expected to close the deal in its fiscal second quarter, or the <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE\">one</a> ending July 31.</p><p>Over the past 12 months, Salesforce shares have advanced 28%, while the <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/EEME\">iShares</a> Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/IGV.UK\">$(IGV.UK)$</a> and the S&amp;P 500 index  have both gained 38%, the tech heavy Nasdaq Composite Index  has grown 46%, and the Dow Jones Industrial Average -- which added Salesforce as a component last year  -- has risen 35%.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"CRM":"赛富时"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2138817953","content_text":"CEO says Salesforce on track for $50 billion in revenue for fiscal 2026.Salesforce.com Inc. shares rose in the extended session Thursday after the cloud-based customer-relationship management company topped Wall Street estimates and hiked its outlook for the year.Salesforce $(CRM.AU)$ shares rose 4.41% after hours, following a 1.7% decline in the regular session to close at $225.83.Salesforce reported fiscal first-quarter net income of $469 million, or 50 cents a share, compared with $99 million, or 11 cents a share, in the year-ago period. Adjusted earnings were $1.21 a share, compared with 70 cents a share in the year-ago period.Revenue rose to $5.96 billion from $4.87 billion in the year-ago quarter.Analysts surveyed by FactSet had estimated earnings of 88 cents a share on revenue of $5.89 billion, based on Salesforce's forecast of 88 cents to 89 cents a share on revenue of $5.88 billion to $5.89 billion back in February .\"We had the best first quarter in our company's history,\" said Marc Benioff, Salesforce chairman and chief executive, in a statement. \"We believe our Customer 360 platform is proving to be the most relevant technology for companies accelerating out of the pandemic.\"\"We're on our path to reach $50 billion in revenue in FY26,\" Benioff added.Salesforce expects adjusted second-quarter earnings of 91 cents to 92 cents a share on revenue of $6.22 billion to $6.23 billion, while analysts had forecast 87 cents a share on revenue of $6.17 billion.For fiscal 2022, Salesforce forecast adjusted earnings of $3.79 to $3.81 a share on revenue of $25.9 billion to $26 billion for the year, with analysts expecting $3.44 a share on revenue of $25.75 billion. Previously, Salesforce has forecast $3.39 to $3.41 a share on revenue of $25.65 billion to $25.75 billion.The full-year outlook includes about $500 million in revenue from the company's $27.7 billion acquisition of Slack Technologies Inc. (WORK) that it announced late last year .  In a late April filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission, the company reiterated it expected to close the deal in its fiscal second quarter, or the one ending July 31.Over the past 12 months, Salesforce shares have advanced 28%, while the iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF $(IGV.UK)$ and the S&P 500 index  have both gained 38%, the tech heavy Nasdaq Composite Index  has grown 46%, and the Dow Jones Industrial Average -- which added Salesforce as a component last year  -- has risen 35%.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":477,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":367700690,"gmtCreate":1614964201510,"gmtModify":1704777752934,"author":{"id":"3573788001234625","authorId":"3573788001234625","name":"Koalala","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e5b56f05d7e4c4896da404f0e1420ae1","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Always a fan of Elon.&nbsp;","listText":"Always a fan of Elon.&nbsp;","text":"Always a fan of Elon.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/367700690","repostId":"1143578966","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1143578966","pubTimestamp":1614953473,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1143578966?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-03-05 22:11","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Elon Musk Says There's A Reason Why Only 2 US Carmakers Have Avoided Bankruptcy Out Of Thousands","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1143578966","media":"Benzinga","summary":"Tesla IncTSLACEO Elon Musk said Thursday that his electric vehicle firm andFord Motor CompanyFwere t","content":"<p><b>Tesla Inc</b>TSLACEO Elon Musk said Thursday that his electric vehicle firm and<b>Ford Motor Company</b>Fwere the only American carmakers not to have gone bankrupt out of the thousands of startups operating in the industry.</p><p><b>What Happened:</b>Muskreasonedon Twitter that while “prototypes are easy, production is hard [and] being cash flow positive is excruciating.”</p><p>The entrepreneur also reacted to Twitter users who posted on the rivalry between the two companies' trucks.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0974f8b57b9ab04258d22e11c50d36ff\" tg-width=\"568\" tg-height=\"739\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><b>Why It Matters:</b>In November 2018, Musk had said in aninterviewthat the “history of car companies in America is terrible.”</p><p>He had said at the time, “the only ones that haven’t gone bankrupt are Tesla and Ford. That’s it. Everyone else has gone bankrupt.”</p><p>Musk credited excruciating effort by him and hundred-hour weeks by Tesla employees for the survival of Tesla.</p><p>Musk had said that while<b>General Motors Company</b>GMand Chrysler&nbsp;— now a marque under<b>Stellantis NV</b>STLA— had already gone bankrupt, Ford and Tesla barely made it through a recession.</p><p>Musk had not seemed upbeat at Ford’s prospects in 2018 and said, “there’s a good chance Ford doesn’t make it in the next recession.”</p><p>In November, Musk revealed that Tesla was only amonth away from bankruptcyahead of the Model 3 rollout.</p><p>He said that it was “extremely difficult” to raise money for an electric car startup when peers like GM and Chrysler were going bankrupt.</p><p>“I put in my last money, even though I thought we would still fail. But, it was either that or certain death for Tesla.”</p><p>On Wednesday, it was reported that Tesla isbleeding Battery EV market shareto Ford Mustang Mach-E, as per Morgan Stanley.</p><p><b>Price Action:</b>Tesla shares fell 3.43% in the after-hours session on Thursday to $600.10 after closing the regular session 4.86% lower at $621.44. On the same day, Ford shares closed nearly 2% lower at $11.93 and fell almost 2.2% in the after-hours session.</p>","source":"lsy1606299360108","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Elon Musk Says There's A Reason Why Only 2 US Carmakers Have Avoided Bankruptcy Out Of Thousands</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nElon Musk Says There's A Reason Why Only 2 US Carmakers Have Avoided Bankruptcy Out Of Thousands\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-03-05 22:11 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.benzinga.com/news/21/03/20025377/elon-musk-says-theres-a-reason-why-only-2-us-carmakers-have-avoided-bankruptcy-out-of-thousands><strong>Benzinga</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Tesla IncTSLACEO Elon Musk said Thursday that his electric vehicle firm andFord Motor CompanyFwere the only American carmakers not to have gone bankrupt out of the thousands of startups operating in ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.benzinga.com/news/21/03/20025377/elon-musk-says-theres-a-reason-why-only-2-us-carmakers-have-avoided-bankruptcy-out-of-thousands\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.benzinga.com/news/21/03/20025377/elon-musk-says-theres-a-reason-why-only-2-us-carmakers-have-avoided-bankruptcy-out-of-thousands","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1143578966","content_text":"Tesla IncTSLACEO Elon Musk said Thursday that his electric vehicle firm andFord Motor CompanyFwere the only American carmakers not to have gone bankrupt out of the thousands of startups operating in the industry.What Happened:Muskreasonedon Twitter that while “prototypes are easy, production is hard [and] being cash flow positive is excruciating.”The entrepreneur also reacted to Twitter users who posted on the rivalry between the two companies' trucks.Why It Matters:In November 2018, Musk had said in aninterviewthat the “history of car companies in America is terrible.”He had said at the time, “the only ones that haven’t gone bankrupt are Tesla and Ford. That’s it. Everyone else has gone bankrupt.”Musk credited excruciating effort by him and hundred-hour weeks by Tesla employees for the survival of Tesla.Musk had said that whileGeneral Motors CompanyGMand Chrysler — now a marque underStellantis NVSTLA— had already gone bankrupt, Ford and Tesla barely made it through a recession.Musk had not seemed upbeat at Ford’s prospects in 2018 and said, “there’s a good chance Ford doesn’t make it in the next recession.”In November, Musk revealed that Tesla was only amonth away from bankruptcyahead of the Model 3 rollout.He said that it was “extremely difficult” to raise money for an electric car startup when peers like GM and Chrysler were going bankrupt.“I put in my last money, even though I thought we would still fail. But, it was either that or certain death for Tesla.”On Wednesday, it was reported that Tesla isbleeding Battery EV market shareto Ford Mustang Mach-E, as per Morgan Stanley.Price Action:Tesla shares fell 3.43% in the after-hours session on Thursday to $600.10 after closing the regular session 4.86% lower at $621.44. On the same day, Ford shares closed nearly 2% lower at $11.93 and fell almost 2.2% in the after-hours session.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":206,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9913747225,"gmtCreate":1664077224967,"gmtModify":1676537387231,"author":{"id":"3573788001234625","authorId":"3573788001234625","name":"Koalala","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e5b56f05d7e4c4896da404f0e1420ae1","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[What]&nbsp;","listText":"[What]&nbsp;","text":"[What]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9913747225","repostId":"2269490734","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2269490734","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1664066508,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2269490734?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-09-25 08:41","market":"us","language":"en","title":"If You're Selling Stocks Because the Fed Is Hiking Interest Rates, You May Be Suffering From “Inflation Illusion”","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2269490734","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"Forget everything you think you know about the relationship between interest rates and the stock market.Forget everything you think you know about the relationship between interest rates and the stock","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Forget everything you think you know about the relationship between interest rates and the stock market.</p><p>Forget everything you think you know about the relationship between interest rates and the stock market. Take the notion that higher interest rates are bad for the stock market, which is almost universally believed on Wall Street. Plausible as this is, it is surprisingly difficult to support it empirically.</p><p>It would be important to challenge this notion at any time, but especially in light of the U.S. market&#39;s decline this past week following the Federal Reserve&#39;s most recent interest-rate hike announcement.</p><p>To show why higher interest rates aren&#39;t necessarily bad for equities, I compared the predictive power of the following two valuation indicators:</p><p>If higher interest rates were always bad for stocks, then the Fed Model&#39;s track record would be superior to that of the earnings yield.</p><p>It is not, as you can see from the table below. The table reports a statistic known as the r-squared, which reflects the degree to which one data series (in this case, the earnings yield or the Fed Model) predicts changes in a second series (in this case, the stock market&#39;s subsequent inflation-adjusted real return). The table reflects the U.S. stock market back to 1871, courtesy of data provided by Yale University&#39;s finance professor Robert Shiller.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/64984acf0f40a1a5e886ef773747472a\" tg-width=\"939\" tg-height=\"268\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>In other words, the ability to predict the stock market&#39;s five- and 10-year returns goes down when taking interest rates into account.</p><h3>Money illusion</h3><p>These results are so surprising that it&#39;s important to explore why the conventional wisdom is wrong. That wisdom is based on the eminently plausible argument that higher interest rates mean that future years&#39; corporate earnings must be discounted at a higher rate when calculating their present value. While that argument is not wrong, Richard Warr,  a finance professor at North Carolina State University, told me, it&#39;s only half the story.</p><p>The other half of this story is that interest rates tend to be higher when inflation is higher, and average nominal earnings tend to grow faster in higher-inflation environments. Failing to appreciate this other half of the story is a fundamental mistake in economics known as &#34;inflation illusion&#34; -- confusing nominal with real, or inflation-adjusted, values.</p><p>According to research conducted by Warr, inflation&#39;s impact on nominal earnings and the discount rate largely cancel each other out over time. While earnings tend to grow faster when inflation is higher, they must be more heavily discounted when calculating their present value.</p><p>Investors were guilty of inflation illusion when they reacted to the Fed&#39;s latest interest rate announcement by selling stocks.</p><p>None of this means that the bear market shouldn&#39;t continue, or that equities aren&#39;t overvalued. Indeed, by many measures, stocks are still overvalued, despite the much cheaper prices wrought by the bear market. The point of this discussion is that higher interest rates are not an additional reason, above and beyond the other factors affecting the stock market, why the market should fall.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>If You're Selling Stocks Because the Fed Is Hiking Interest Rates, You May Be Suffering From “Inflation Illusion”</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nIf You're Selling Stocks Because the Fed Is Hiking Interest Rates, You May Be Suffering From “Inflation Illusion”\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-09-25 08:41</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>Forget everything you think you know about the relationship between interest rates and the stock market.</p><p>Forget everything you think you know about the relationship between interest rates and the stock market. Take the notion that higher interest rates are bad for the stock market, which is almost universally believed on Wall Street. Plausible as this is, it is surprisingly difficult to support it empirically.</p><p>It would be important to challenge this notion at any time, but especially in light of the U.S. market&#39;s decline this past week following the Federal Reserve&#39;s most recent interest-rate hike announcement.</p><p>To show why higher interest rates aren&#39;t necessarily bad for equities, I compared the predictive power of the following two valuation indicators:</p><p>If higher interest rates were always bad for stocks, then the Fed Model&#39;s track record would be superior to that of the earnings yield.</p><p>It is not, as you can see from the table below. The table reports a statistic known as the r-squared, which reflects the degree to which one data series (in this case, the earnings yield or the Fed Model) predicts changes in a second series (in this case, the stock market&#39;s subsequent inflation-adjusted real return). The table reflects the U.S. stock market back to 1871, courtesy of data provided by Yale University&#39;s finance professor Robert Shiller.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/64984acf0f40a1a5e886ef773747472a\" tg-width=\"939\" tg-height=\"268\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>In other words, the ability to predict the stock market&#39;s five- and 10-year returns goes down when taking interest rates into account.</p><h3>Money illusion</h3><p>These results are so surprising that it&#39;s important to explore why the conventional wisdom is wrong. That wisdom is based on the eminently plausible argument that higher interest rates mean that future years&#39; corporate earnings must be discounted at a higher rate when calculating their present value. While that argument is not wrong, Richard Warr,  a finance professor at North Carolina State University, told me, it&#39;s only half the story.</p><p>The other half of this story is that interest rates tend to be higher when inflation is higher, and average nominal earnings tend to grow faster in higher-inflation environments. Failing to appreciate this other half of the story is a fundamental mistake in economics known as &#34;inflation illusion&#34; -- confusing nominal with real, or inflation-adjusted, values.</p><p>According to research conducted by Warr, inflation&#39;s impact on nominal earnings and the discount rate largely cancel each other out over time. While earnings tend to grow faster when inflation is higher, they must be more heavily discounted when calculating their present value.</p><p>Investors were guilty of inflation illusion when they reacted to the Fed&#39;s latest interest rate announcement by selling stocks.</p><p>None of this means that the bear market shouldn&#39;t continue, or that equities aren&#39;t overvalued. Indeed, by many measures, stocks are still overvalued, despite the much cheaper prices wrought by the bear market. The point of this discussion is that higher interest rates are not an additional reason, above and beyond the other factors affecting the stock market, why the market should fall.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2269490734","content_text":"Forget everything you think you know about the relationship between interest rates and the stock market.Forget everything you think you know about the relationship between interest rates and the stock market. Take the notion that higher interest rates are bad for the stock market, which is almost universally believed on Wall Street. Plausible as this is, it is surprisingly difficult to support it empirically.It would be important to challenge this notion at any time, but especially in light of the U.S. market's decline this past week following the Federal Reserve's most recent interest-rate hike announcement.To show why higher interest rates aren't necessarily bad for equities, I compared the predictive power of the following two valuation indicators:If higher interest rates were always bad for stocks, then the Fed Model's track record would be superior to that of the earnings yield.It is not, as you can see from the table below. The table reports a statistic known as the r-squared, which reflects the degree to which one data series (in this case, the earnings yield or the Fed Model) predicts changes in a second series (in this case, the stock market's subsequent inflation-adjusted real return). The table reflects the U.S. stock market back to 1871, courtesy of data provided by Yale University's finance professor Robert Shiller.In other words, the ability to predict the stock market's five- and 10-year returns goes down when taking interest rates into account.Money illusionThese results are so surprising that it's important to explore why the conventional wisdom is wrong. That wisdom is based on the eminently plausible argument that higher interest rates mean that future years' corporate earnings must be discounted at a higher rate when calculating their present value. While that argument is not wrong, Richard Warr,  a finance professor at North Carolina State University, told me, it's only half the story.The other half of this story is that interest rates tend to be higher when inflation is higher, and average nominal earnings tend to grow faster in higher-inflation environments. Failing to appreciate this other half of the story is a fundamental mistake in economics known as \"inflation illusion\" -- confusing nominal with real, or inflation-adjusted, values.According to research conducted by Warr, inflation's impact on nominal earnings and the discount rate largely cancel each other out over time. While earnings tend to grow faster when inflation is higher, they must be more heavily discounted when calculating their present value.Investors were guilty of inflation illusion when they reacted to the Fed's latest interest rate announcement by selling stocks.None of this means that the bear market shouldn't continue, or that equities aren't overvalued. Indeed, by many measures, stocks are still overvalued, despite the much cheaper prices wrought by the bear market. The point of this discussion is that higher interest rates are not an additional reason, above and beyond the other factors affecting the stock market, why the market should fall.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":276,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":341708736,"gmtCreate":1617852543225,"gmtModify":1704703947858,"author":{"id":"3573788001234625","authorId":"3573788001234625","name":"Koalala","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e5b56f05d7e4c4896da404f0e1420ae1","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AWX.SI\">$AEM HOLDINGS LTD(AWX.SI)$</a> Waiting for it to hit $5. This company is undervalued&nbsp;","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AWX.SI\">$AEM HOLDINGS LTD(AWX.SI)$</a> Waiting for it to hit $5. This company is undervalued&nbsp;","text":"$AEM HOLDINGS LTD(AWX.SI)$ Waiting for it to hit $5. This company is undervalued","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/341708736","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":778,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[{"author":{"id":"3577523199494654","authorId":"3577523199494654","name":"88huat","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/25dd805cbb44e8ac7c9eb01650c81b9f","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"content":"Agree! Im also holding for long","text":"Agree! Im also holding for long","html":"Agree! Im also holding for long"}],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9938695538,"gmtCreate":1662598983024,"gmtModify":1676537096849,"author":{"id":"3573788001234625","authorId":"3573788001234625","name":"Koalala","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e5b56f05d7e4c4896da404f0e1420ae1","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[What]&nbsp;","listText":"[What]&nbsp;","text":"[What]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9938695538","repostId":"1119363305","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1119363305","pubTimestamp":1662613739,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1119363305?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-09-08 13:08","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Tim Cook Didn’t Have \"One More Thing,\" so Apple Offered Consumers a Break, for Once","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1119363305","media":"MarketWatch","summary":"Apple’s iPhone 14 event was notable more for what the company didn’t do: Raise prices on its top-end smartphonesApple CEO Tim Cook holds a new iPhone 14 Pro during Wednesday’s eventn Cupertino, Calif.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Apple’s iPhone 14 event was notable more for what the company didn’t do: Raise prices on its top-end smartphones</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/689ed65479a46375dcaf6fa32912c643\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Apple CEO Tim Cook holds a new iPhone 14 Pro during Wednesday’s eventn Cupertino, Calif. GETTY IMAGES</span></p><p>Chief Executive Tim Cook didn’t show off “one more thing” on Wednesday, but he did have one new Apple Inc. offering to share: reasonable pricing.</p><p>Apple has long shown a willingness to charge premium prices for its iPhones, including breaking the $1,000 barrier a few years back with the iPhone X, and was expected to increase prices on the smartphones again with the iPhone 14 unveiling on Wednesday. Cook kept the price the same as the last two iPhone models, however, and even added in some other deals: Free satellite emergency service for two years, and an update to Apple Care+ to remove a limit on the number of repairs each year.</p><p>“It was a shock, I thought a $100 price increase was a foregone conclusion,” said Dan Ives, an analyst at Wedbush Securities. “Apple read the room and Cook didn’t want to raise prices.”</p><p>At the very least, analysts expected Apple to increase prices on its top-end smartphones, the iPhone Pro and Pro Max. Maribel Lopez, principal analyst at Lopez Research, said she had been hearing talk of price hikes of up to several hundred dollars that would “fork the line,” or allow greater separation between lower-priced and premium offerings.</p><p>“This was their opportunity, they were going to fork the line, and have very affordable and very flagship, and that was surprising that didn’t happen,” Lopez said. “I think that is the right move. It’s becoming difficult to get people to upgrade, they hold onto them longer, they are not inexpensive.”</p><p>The concern for investors from this move would be Apple’s profit margin. Record inflation has not just hit consumers — electronics manufacturers are seeing higher prices and uncertain supply of many components. The 15-year-old iPhone family is still Apple’s biggest revenue and profit generator, even as it is a mature product, so a margin decline would be felt acutely on the overall bottom line.</p><p>Lopez and Ives said the move should not be too much of a drag on Apple’s margins, however, thanks to strength with suppliers and a move toward using Apple’s own semiconductors.</p><p>“They have more control over their supply chain,” Ives said, adding that “the Apple silicon gives them flexibility.”</p><p>“Everything being an A or an M chip, that allows them a certain flexibility,” Lopez said. “It’s a classic vertical integration strategy.”</p><p>Apple unveiled some new offerings that were not price-related, mostly features targeted at increasingly specific audiences, such as the Apple Ultra Watch for serious fitness enthusiasts. But Cook again didn’t take the opportunity to use co-founder Steve Jobs’ product-launch catchphrase, “one more thing,” at the end of an unveiling to show off the next big product — even though Apple may have a big launch on the way.</p><p>Apple reportedly is working on three sets of augmented/virtual-reality glasses, with one expected to launch next year and compete with Meta Platforms Inc.’s Oculus offerings. It would be only the second major product category to launch under Cook’s leadership, beside the Apple Watch.</p><p>But Apple never shows off the next big thing without a fully formed product ready to roll. So instead, Cook is just trying to keep consumers happy with new iPhones — at flat prices with better cameras, longer battery life and new features — until its next foray is actually ready.</p><p>That doesn’t do much for investors, though. They are still wondering when they will get a glimpse at the next device they are betting on, and will have to worry about the possibility of declining margins while they wait.</p><p><b>Also Read: Apple Launching iPhone 14 and Other Products, a &#39;Major Feat&#39; Says Analyst</b>  Sources: StreetInsider</p><p>Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) held its first in-person product launch event since before the pandemic Wednesday afternoon with the highly anticipated iPhone 14 launch.</p><p>While the iPhone 14 was front and center at the launch event, Apple also announced a raft of other products and updates, including the Apple Watch Series 8 and the enhanced AirPods Pro 2.</p><p>The iPhone 14 series includes the general model, the 14 Plus, the 14 Pro, and the 14 Pro Max.Apple said the 14 and 14 Plus models include the A15 Bionic chip with a 5-core GPU, while the 14 Pro and Pro Max are powered by A16 Bionic, the fastest chip ever in a smartphone.</p><p>Furthermore, Apple announced new satellite-enabled services for some of its products, with Globalstar, a satellite communications firm, managing the satellite-powered emergency SOS service.</p><p>Apple will pay 95% of the approved capital spending Globalstar makes in connection with the new satellites, according to a filing.It also states that they are expected to make the services available to customers during the fourth quarter of 2022.</p><p>Globalstar shares surged following the news earlier today but closed the session down 1.4%.</p><p>Reacting to the Apple announcements and event, Wedbush analyst Daniel Ives, who has an Outperform rating and a $220 price target on the stock, said, &#34;the Apple Watch and AirPods have transformed from a rounding error to a significant tangential product segment at Apple.&#34;</p><p>He added that it speaks to the monetization of a golden 1.8 billion iOS installed base that remains &#34;unmatched globally.&#34;</p><p>&#34;Taking a step back, launching 3 new core hardware products within the Apple ecosystem despite the biggest supply chain crisis seen in modern history is a major feat for Cook &amp; Co., especially with the zero Covid shutdowns in China seen in April/May,&#34; he added.</p><p>Commenting specifically on the iPhone 14 launch, Ives stated they believe the &#34;initial order for 90 million iPhone 14 units out of the gates with Asian suppliers has stayed firm&#34; based on recent checks and will be roughly flat with iPhone 13 despite the macro storm clouds building.&#34;</p><p>Apple shares gained just under 1% in Wednesday&#39;s session.</p></body></html>","source":"lsy1603348471595","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Tim Cook Didn’t Have \"One More Thing,\" so Apple Offered Consumers a Break, for Once</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTim Cook Didn’t Have \"One More Thing,\" so Apple Offered Consumers a Break, for Once\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-09-08 13:08 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.marketwatch.com/story/tim-cook-didnt-have-one-more-thing-so-apple-offered-consumers-a-break-for-once-11662592956?mod=mw_latestnews><strong>MarketWatch</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Apple’s iPhone 14 event was notable more for what the company didn’t do: Raise prices on its top-end smartphonesApple CEO Tim Cook holds a new iPhone 14 Pro during Wednesday’s eventn Cupertino, Calif....</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/tim-cook-didnt-have-one-more-thing-so-apple-offered-consumers-a-break-for-once-11662592956?mod=mw_latestnews\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/tim-cook-didnt-have-one-more-thing-so-apple-offered-consumers-a-break-for-once-11662592956?mod=mw_latestnews","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1119363305","content_text":"Apple’s iPhone 14 event was notable more for what the company didn’t do: Raise prices on its top-end smartphonesApple CEO Tim Cook holds a new iPhone 14 Pro during Wednesday’s eventn Cupertino, Calif. GETTY IMAGESChief Executive Tim Cook didn’t show off “one more thing” on Wednesday, but he did have one new Apple Inc. offering to share: reasonable pricing.Apple has long shown a willingness to charge premium prices for its iPhones, including breaking the $1,000 barrier a few years back with the iPhone X, and was expected to increase prices on the smartphones again with the iPhone 14 unveiling on Wednesday. Cook kept the price the same as the last two iPhone models, however, and even added in some other deals: Free satellite emergency service for two years, and an update to Apple Care+ to remove a limit on the number of repairs each year.“It was a shock, I thought a $100 price increase was a foregone conclusion,” said Dan Ives, an analyst at Wedbush Securities. “Apple read the room and Cook didn’t want to raise prices.”At the very least, analysts expected Apple to increase prices on its top-end smartphones, the iPhone Pro and Pro Max. Maribel Lopez, principal analyst at Lopez Research, said she had been hearing talk of price hikes of up to several hundred dollars that would “fork the line,” or allow greater separation between lower-priced and premium offerings.“This was their opportunity, they were going to fork the line, and have very affordable and very flagship, and that was surprising that didn’t happen,” Lopez said. “I think that is the right move. It’s becoming difficult to get people to upgrade, they hold onto them longer, they are not inexpensive.”The concern for investors from this move would be Apple’s profit margin. Record inflation has not just hit consumers — electronics manufacturers are seeing higher prices and uncertain supply of many components. The 15-year-old iPhone family is still Apple’s biggest revenue and profit generator, even as it is a mature product, so a margin decline would be felt acutely on the overall bottom line.Lopez and Ives said the move should not be too much of a drag on Apple’s margins, however, thanks to strength with suppliers and a move toward using Apple’s own semiconductors.“They have more control over their supply chain,” Ives said, adding that “the Apple silicon gives them flexibility.”“Everything being an A or an M chip, that allows them a certain flexibility,” Lopez said. “It’s a classic vertical integration strategy.”Apple unveiled some new offerings that were not price-related, mostly features targeted at increasingly specific audiences, such as the Apple Ultra Watch for serious fitness enthusiasts. But Cook again didn’t take the opportunity to use co-founder Steve Jobs’ product-launch catchphrase, “one more thing,” at the end of an unveiling to show off the next big product — even though Apple may have a big launch on the way.Apple reportedly is working on three sets of augmented/virtual-reality glasses, with one expected to launch next year and compete with Meta Platforms Inc.’s Oculus offerings. It would be only the second major product category to launch under Cook’s leadership, beside the Apple Watch.But Apple never shows off the next big thing without a fully formed product ready to roll. So instead, Cook is just trying to keep consumers happy with new iPhones — at flat prices with better cameras, longer battery life and new features — until its next foray is actually ready.That doesn’t do much for investors, though. They are still wondering when they will get a glimpse at the next device they are betting on, and will have to worry about the possibility of declining margins while they wait.Also Read: Apple Launching iPhone 14 and Other Products, a 'Major Feat' Says Analyst  Sources: StreetInsiderApple (NASDAQ:AAPL) held its first in-person product launch event since before the pandemic Wednesday afternoon with the highly anticipated iPhone 14 launch.While the iPhone 14 was front and center at the launch event, Apple also announced a raft of other products and updates, including the Apple Watch Series 8 and the enhanced AirPods Pro 2.The iPhone 14 series includes the general model, the 14 Plus, the 14 Pro, and the 14 Pro Max.Apple said the 14 and 14 Plus models include the A15 Bionic chip with a 5-core GPU, while the 14 Pro and Pro Max are powered by A16 Bionic, the fastest chip ever in a smartphone.Furthermore, Apple announced new satellite-enabled services for some of its products, with Globalstar, a satellite communications firm, managing the satellite-powered emergency SOS service.Apple will pay 95% of the approved capital spending Globalstar makes in connection with the new satellites, according to a filing.It also states that they are expected to make the services available to customers during the fourth quarter of 2022.Globalstar shares surged following the news earlier today but closed the session down 1.4%.Reacting to the Apple announcements and event, Wedbush analyst Daniel Ives, who has an Outperform rating and a $220 price target on the stock, said, \"the Apple Watch and AirPods have transformed from a rounding error to a significant tangential product segment at Apple.\"He added that it speaks to the monetization of a golden 1.8 billion iOS installed base that remains \"unmatched globally.\"\"Taking a step back, launching 3 new core hardware products within the Apple ecosystem despite the biggest supply chain crisis seen in modern history is a major feat for Cook & Co., especially with the zero Covid shutdowns in China seen in April/May,\" he added.Commenting specifically on the iPhone 14 launch, Ives stated they believe the \"initial order for 90 million iPhone 14 units out of the gates with Asian suppliers has stayed firm\" based on recent checks and will be roughly flat with iPhone 13 despite the macro storm clouds building.\"Apple shares gained just under 1% in Wednesday's session.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":161,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":105349129,"gmtCreate":1620273130761,"gmtModify":1704341165327,"author":{"id":"3573788001234625","authorId":"3573788001234625","name":"Koalala","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e5b56f05d7e4c4896da404f0e1420ae1","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Should buy <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FSLY\">$Fastly, Inc.(FSLY)$</a>on the dip?","listText":"Should buy <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FSLY\">$Fastly, Inc.(FSLY)$</a>on the dip?","text":"Should buy $Fastly, Inc.(FSLY)$on the dip?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/105349129","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":867,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[{"author":{"id":"3580207873824156","authorId":"3580207873824156","name":"Rollyxuxu","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"content":"Can consider picking some up at the support 48. seems oversold given that the CFO is not leaving immediately","text":"Can consider picking some up at the support 48. seems oversold given that the CFO is not leaving immediately","html":"Can consider picking some up at the support 48. seems oversold given that the CFO is not leaving immediately"}],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":373463636,"gmtCreate":1618878552325,"gmtModify":1704716192587,"author":{"id":"3573788001234625","authorId":"3573788001234625","name":"Koalala","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e5b56f05d7e4c4896da404f0e1420ae1","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hold <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSM\">$Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing(TSM)$</a>for long.&nbsp;","listText":"Hold <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSM\">$Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing(TSM)$</a>for long.&nbsp;","text":"Hold $Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing(TSM)$for long.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/373463636","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":515,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9936577499,"gmtCreate":1662791704811,"gmtModify":1676537142478,"author":{"id":"3573788001234625","authorId":"3573788001234625","name":"Koalala","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e5b56f05d7e4c4896da404f0e1420ae1","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[Miser]&nbsp;","listText":"[Miser]&nbsp;","text":"[Miser]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9936577499","repostId":"2266415879","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2266415879","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1662773640,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2266415879?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-09-10 09:34","market":"uk","language":"en","title":"She Was the Best of Us","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2266415879","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"ByAndrew RobertsMr. Roberts is the author, most recently, of \"The Last King of America: The Misunder","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8fb38370e84ba1fea7d758c98f97d645\" tg-width=\"1280\" tg-height=\"853\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><i>ByAndrew Roberts</i></p><p><i>Mr. Roberts is the author, most recently, of &#34;The Last King of America: The Misunderstood Reign of George III&#34; and a royal commentator for NBC News.</i></p><p>We British like to believe that we have the virtues of duty, decency, good humor and tolerance as part of our national DNA. There might be some self-delusion in this, and it is certainly not always true, but it is a strong part of our self-defining myth as a people. Of one Briton, however, it genuinely was true, and for 70 years we have known that because of her virtues we would always be proud of her wherever she went -- and thus proud of our country too. She was a fine lifelong role model for millions in Britain, the Commonwealth and around the world.</p><p>The complete certainty that -- whatever the rest of her family might say or do -- Her Majesty The Queen would never embarrass us on the world stage, but would always perform her duties with the utmost professionalism and unflappable calm, made her the soft-power equivalent of an aircraft carrier when it came to international relations. However much our other national institutions might let us down, we always knew that The Queen would never put a step out of place or say a single word that would make us cringe.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/96243ab593f31f43979c5b0356e3e1f3\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"467\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Queen Elizabeth II and her husband Prince Philip in Buckingham Palace, December 1958. They were married for 73 years before his death in 2021.</span></p><p>In the full glare of the global media for seven decades, meeting hundreds of thousands of people one-on-one and untold millions in public events, traveling to over a hundred countries of the world, dealing with delicate diplomatic incidents that today are history but at the time could have produced strife, advising 15 prime ministers from Winston Churchill to Liz Truss, she knew just what to do. It seems almost superhuman; it was certainly the absolute acme of professionalism. Would to God that more of our leaders in public life had a fraction of her grace, her gravitas and, above all, her common sense.</p><p>The Queen had an uncanny knack for encapsulating in a phrase what the rest of us think but rarely quite put into words, or at least rarely have the opportunity to say to the right person at the right time. &#34;Why did no one see it coming?&#34; she asked Mervyn King, the Governor of the Bank of England, about the 2008 Great Crash. &#34;Why would anyone want the job?&#34; she asked Boris Johnson when he became prime minister during the Brexit maelstrom. Then there was the sixth sense she had for what her people were feeling. When they were hurting financially during the Great Crash, she canceled her birthday party at the Ritz. And of course there was her choice of the apposite phrase. &#34;Grief is the price we pay for love,&#34; she said in the aftermath of 9/11, encapsulating precisely what the West was feeling.</p><p>Remember those words as we watch the long line of mourning Britons and her subjects from 15 countries across the globe next week, stretching from her catafalque in Westminster Hall. I strongly suspect that it will go down the Thames all the way to the City of London financial district in the east of the capital, as they pay their respects at her lying-in-state. They will come from across the four kingdoms and from around the world; they will wait patiently in line for very many hours on end; they will doggedly put up with the rain and cold winds all night; they will josh with the coppers and stay cheerful; they will bring their children and grandchildren who will one day be able to tell their own children and grandchildren that they paid their last respects to Queen Elizabeth II, Elizabeth the Good.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c415ea69257bd5839a78c9d5e0eca6f1\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"467\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Left to right: West German Chancellor Helmut Kohl, Queen Elizabeth II, President Ronald Reagan and U.K. Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher at Buckingham Palace during a summit for world leaders, June 1984.</span></p><p>Everyone would have perfectly understood if Her Majesty had decided to appoint Liz Truss as prime minister by a <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ZM\">Zoom</a> call. She had missed the Braemar Highland Games and had been suffering ill health, and a personal meeting wasn&#39;t strictly constitutionally necessary. As we now know -- and as she herself might well have suspected -- she only had two more days to live. But anyone who thought that she would put her personal comfort before what she saw as her duty doesn&#39;t understand the character of The Queen, the last of the Greatest Generation. When she was shot at six times as she rode down the Mall at the Trooping of the Colour in 1981, she didn&#39;t know the assailant was firing blanks, but she carried on the parade regardless. That is the kind of raw courage we took for granted from her.</p><p>Britain has undergone several extremely difficult moments over the past 70 years as it has been transformed in almost every conceivable way. The Suez Crisis, only four years into the Queen&#39;s reign, forced us to come to terms with the loss of the largest empire in world history over the course of only a decade or so, yet we never responded to the imperial humiliation in the way that France did in Algeria, let alone the way Putin is doing in Ukraine. The 1970s saw the serious danger of Britain slipping into the position of a third-rank power, and the tough-love medicine that Margaret Thatcher imposed to reverse that trajectory in the 1980s led to violent strikes and riots, yet not to worse. The issue of race hatred is thankfully largely behind Britons now, but we must never forget that it occasionally caused civil unrest. The refusal of much of the Establishment to accept the result of the Brexit referendum toxified British politics for half a decade. British history since 1952 hasn&#39;t been plain sailing.</p><p>Yet the knowledge that at the apex of our political system, our constitutional structure, our armed forces, our Commonwealth, our legal system and our national church stood a lady of irreproachable morals, who moreover confined her political involvement to advising, encouraging and warning but never to partisan politics, has exercised an inestimably positive influence on our public life. Liz Truss wasn&#39;t exaggerating when she perceptively said that the Queen was &#34;the rock upon which modern Britain was built.&#34;</p><p>Although she was a small &#34;c&#34; conservative in many aspects of life, as many nonagenarians naturally are, The Queen was always exemplary in the way that she never interfered in politics, and Sir Keir Starmer&#39;s public statement showed that the Labour Party admired her just as much as the large-c Conservatives. In a country that is being riven by extreme partisan politics at the moment, as Britons face a post-Covid future and inflationary spirals, admiration for her was one of the few things that united both frontbenches in parliament. Now even that has gone.</p><p>More than a century separated the births of The Queen&#39;s first prime minister, Winston Churchill, and her last, Liz Truss. Even more extraordinary, the 96 years of her life constitutes 39% of the existence of the United States as an independent country. Her love of the United States -- her only incognito holidays were taken in Kentucky -- was instrumental in keeping our most important alliance, the Special Relationship, as fresh as it is profound. We have only just begun to note the number of ways we are going to miss her, on both the international and the domestic stages.</p><p>A millennium-old monarchy is a book of many chapters. One unusually long and glorious chapter has closed, and a new one is now opening. If Britain today seems somewhat untethered, mournful of course but also apprehensive, it is because King Charles III has almost impossibly large boots to fill. Yet he has been waiting for 70 of his 73 years for the role to devolve upon him and is therefore supremely ready for it. There is something immensely spiritually right that a role such as this is assumed during a period of mourning. Politicians take power feeling like they have won the lottery; monarchs accede to thrones mournful at the death of their parent. Succession at a time of somber reflection rather than exultant triumph is part of the genius of constitutional monarchy.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/874414f0f61b424aaf7b94a980470613\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"467\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Queen Elizabeth II in the House of Lords for the opening of Parliament, May 2015. She continued to fulfill her duties until the end, appointing her 15th prime minister, Liz Truss, on Sept 6.</span></p><p>We as a nation made The Queen do things that we would never, ever, even consider doing ourselves. We expected her to do her job to the age of 96, when we retire at 65, and to keep doing it up to two days before her death. We expected her to invite bloodthirsty dictators to stay in her home, because British foreign policy interests required it. We expected her, aged 86, to stand on a boat in the Thames in the freezing rain during the diamond jubilee, waving for hour after hour. We expected her to shake the hand of a former IRA gunmen who approved the murder of her husband&#39;s uncle. We expected her to smile and charm and shake hands cordially, whatever she might privately have been feeling inside about her family&#39;s all-too-public traumas.</p><p>She did all of it, and in 70 years she never once complained. She was the best of us.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>She Was the Best of Us</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nShe Was the Best of Us\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-09-10 09:34</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8fb38370e84ba1fea7d758c98f97d645\" tg-width=\"1280\" tg-height=\"853\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><i>ByAndrew Roberts</i></p><p><i>Mr. Roberts is the author, most recently, of &#34;The Last King of America: The Misunderstood Reign of George III&#34; and a royal commentator for NBC News.</i></p><p>We British like to believe that we have the virtues of duty, decency, good humor and tolerance as part of our national DNA. There might be some self-delusion in this, and it is certainly not always true, but it is a strong part of our self-defining myth as a people. Of one Briton, however, it genuinely was true, and for 70 years we have known that because of her virtues we would always be proud of her wherever she went -- and thus proud of our country too. She was a fine lifelong role model for millions in Britain, the Commonwealth and around the world.</p><p>The complete certainty that -- whatever the rest of her family might say or do -- Her Majesty The Queen would never embarrass us on the world stage, but would always perform her duties with the utmost professionalism and unflappable calm, made her the soft-power equivalent of an aircraft carrier when it came to international relations. However much our other national institutions might let us down, we always knew that The Queen would never put a step out of place or say a single word that would make us cringe.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/96243ab593f31f43979c5b0356e3e1f3\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"467\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Queen Elizabeth II and her husband Prince Philip in Buckingham Palace, December 1958. They were married for 73 years before his death in 2021.</span></p><p>In the full glare of the global media for seven decades, meeting hundreds of thousands of people one-on-one and untold millions in public events, traveling to over a hundred countries of the world, dealing with delicate diplomatic incidents that today are history but at the time could have produced strife, advising 15 prime ministers from Winston Churchill to Liz Truss, she knew just what to do. It seems almost superhuman; it was certainly the absolute acme of professionalism. Would to God that more of our leaders in public life had a fraction of her grace, her gravitas and, above all, her common sense.</p><p>The Queen had an uncanny knack for encapsulating in a phrase what the rest of us think but rarely quite put into words, or at least rarely have the opportunity to say to the right person at the right time. &#34;Why did no one see it coming?&#34; she asked Mervyn King, the Governor of the Bank of England, about the 2008 Great Crash. &#34;Why would anyone want the job?&#34; she asked Boris Johnson when he became prime minister during the Brexit maelstrom. Then there was the sixth sense she had for what her people were feeling. When they were hurting financially during the Great Crash, she canceled her birthday party at the Ritz. And of course there was her choice of the apposite phrase. &#34;Grief is the price we pay for love,&#34; she said in the aftermath of 9/11, encapsulating precisely what the West was feeling.</p><p>Remember those words as we watch the long line of mourning Britons and her subjects from 15 countries across the globe next week, stretching from her catafalque in Westminster Hall. I strongly suspect that it will go down the Thames all the way to the City of London financial district in the east of the capital, as they pay their respects at her lying-in-state. They will come from across the four kingdoms and from around the world; they will wait patiently in line for very many hours on end; they will doggedly put up with the rain and cold winds all night; they will josh with the coppers and stay cheerful; they will bring their children and grandchildren who will one day be able to tell their own children and grandchildren that they paid their last respects to Queen Elizabeth II, Elizabeth the Good.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c415ea69257bd5839a78c9d5e0eca6f1\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"467\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Left to right: West German Chancellor Helmut Kohl, Queen Elizabeth II, President Ronald Reagan and U.K. Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher at Buckingham Palace during a summit for world leaders, June 1984.</span></p><p>Everyone would have perfectly understood if Her Majesty had decided to appoint Liz Truss as prime minister by a <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ZM\">Zoom</a> call. She had missed the Braemar Highland Games and had been suffering ill health, and a personal meeting wasn&#39;t strictly constitutionally necessary. As we now know -- and as she herself might well have suspected -- she only had two more days to live. But anyone who thought that she would put her personal comfort before what she saw as her duty doesn&#39;t understand the character of The Queen, the last of the Greatest Generation. When she was shot at six times as she rode down the Mall at the Trooping of the Colour in 1981, she didn&#39;t know the assailant was firing blanks, but she carried on the parade regardless. That is the kind of raw courage we took for granted from her.</p><p>Britain has undergone several extremely difficult moments over the past 70 years as it has been transformed in almost every conceivable way. The Suez Crisis, only four years into the Queen&#39;s reign, forced us to come to terms with the loss of the largest empire in world history over the course of only a decade or so, yet we never responded to the imperial humiliation in the way that France did in Algeria, let alone the way Putin is doing in Ukraine. The 1970s saw the serious danger of Britain slipping into the position of a third-rank power, and the tough-love medicine that Margaret Thatcher imposed to reverse that trajectory in the 1980s led to violent strikes and riots, yet not to worse. The issue of race hatred is thankfully largely behind Britons now, but we must never forget that it occasionally caused civil unrest. The refusal of much of the Establishment to accept the result of the Brexit referendum toxified British politics for half a decade. British history since 1952 hasn&#39;t been plain sailing.</p><p>Yet the knowledge that at the apex of our political system, our constitutional structure, our armed forces, our Commonwealth, our legal system and our national church stood a lady of irreproachable morals, who moreover confined her political involvement to advising, encouraging and warning but never to partisan politics, has exercised an inestimably positive influence on our public life. Liz Truss wasn&#39;t exaggerating when she perceptively said that the Queen was &#34;the rock upon which modern Britain was built.&#34;</p><p>Although she was a small &#34;c&#34; conservative in many aspects of life, as many nonagenarians naturally are, The Queen was always exemplary in the way that she never interfered in politics, and Sir Keir Starmer&#39;s public statement showed that the Labour Party admired her just as much as the large-c Conservatives. In a country that is being riven by extreme partisan politics at the moment, as Britons face a post-Covid future and inflationary spirals, admiration for her was one of the few things that united both frontbenches in parliament. Now even that has gone.</p><p>More than a century separated the births of The Queen&#39;s first prime minister, Winston Churchill, and her last, Liz Truss. Even more extraordinary, the 96 years of her life constitutes 39% of the existence of the United States as an independent country. Her love of the United States -- her only incognito holidays were taken in Kentucky -- was instrumental in keeping our most important alliance, the Special Relationship, as fresh as it is profound. We have only just begun to note the number of ways we are going to miss her, on both the international and the domestic stages.</p><p>A millennium-old monarchy is a book of many chapters. One unusually long and glorious chapter has closed, and a new one is now opening. If Britain today seems somewhat untethered, mournful of course but also apprehensive, it is because King Charles III has almost impossibly large boots to fill. Yet he has been waiting for 70 of his 73 years for the role to devolve upon him and is therefore supremely ready for it. There is something immensely spiritually right that a role such as this is assumed during a period of mourning. Politicians take power feeling like they have won the lottery; monarchs accede to thrones mournful at the death of their parent. Succession at a time of somber reflection rather than exultant triumph is part of the genius of constitutional monarchy.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/874414f0f61b424aaf7b94a980470613\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"467\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Queen Elizabeth II in the House of Lords for the opening of Parliament, May 2015. She continued to fulfill her duties until the end, appointing her 15th prime minister, Liz Truss, on Sept 6.</span></p><p>We as a nation made The Queen do things that we would never, ever, even consider doing ourselves. We expected her to do her job to the age of 96, when we retire at 65, and to keep doing it up to two days before her death. We expected her to invite bloodthirsty dictators to stay in her home, because British foreign policy interests required it. We expected her, aged 86, to stand on a boat in the Thames in the freezing rain during the diamond jubilee, waving for hour after hour. We expected her to shake the hand of a former IRA gunmen who approved the murder of her husband&#39;s uncle. We expected her to smile and charm and shake hands cordially, whatever she might privately have been feeling inside about her family&#39;s all-too-public traumas.</p><p>She did all of it, and in 70 years she never once complained. She was the best of us.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2266415879","content_text":"ByAndrew RobertsMr. Roberts is the author, most recently, of \"The Last King of America: The Misunderstood Reign of George III\" and a royal commentator for NBC News.We British like to believe that we have the virtues of duty, decency, good humor and tolerance as part of our national DNA. There might be some self-delusion in this, and it is certainly not always true, but it is a strong part of our self-defining myth as a people. Of one Briton, however, it genuinely was true, and for 70 years we have known that because of her virtues we would always be proud of her wherever she went -- and thus proud of our country too. She was a fine lifelong role model for millions in Britain, the Commonwealth and around the world.The complete certainty that -- whatever the rest of her family might say or do -- Her Majesty The Queen would never embarrass us on the world stage, but would always perform her duties with the utmost professionalism and unflappable calm, made her the soft-power equivalent of an aircraft carrier when it came to international relations. However much our other national institutions might let us down, we always knew that The Queen would never put a step out of place or say a single word that would make us cringe.Queen Elizabeth II and her husband Prince Philip in Buckingham Palace, December 1958. They were married for 73 years before his death in 2021.In the full glare of the global media for seven decades, meeting hundreds of thousands of people one-on-one and untold millions in public events, traveling to over a hundred countries of the world, dealing with delicate diplomatic incidents that today are history but at the time could have produced strife, advising 15 prime ministers from Winston Churchill to Liz Truss, she knew just what to do. It seems almost superhuman; it was certainly the absolute acme of professionalism. Would to God that more of our leaders in public life had a fraction of her grace, her gravitas and, above all, her common sense.The Queen had an uncanny knack for encapsulating in a phrase what the rest of us think but rarely quite put into words, or at least rarely have the opportunity to say to the right person at the right time. \"Why did no one see it coming?\" she asked Mervyn King, the Governor of the Bank of England, about the 2008 Great Crash. \"Why would anyone want the job?\" she asked Boris Johnson when he became prime minister during the Brexit maelstrom. Then there was the sixth sense she had for what her people were feeling. When they were hurting financially during the Great Crash, she canceled her birthday party at the Ritz. And of course there was her choice of the apposite phrase. \"Grief is the price we pay for love,\" she said in the aftermath of 9/11, encapsulating precisely what the West was feeling.Remember those words as we watch the long line of mourning Britons and her subjects from 15 countries across the globe next week, stretching from her catafalque in Westminster Hall. I strongly suspect that it will go down the Thames all the way to the City of London financial district in the east of the capital, as they pay their respects at her lying-in-state. They will come from across the four kingdoms and from around the world; they will wait patiently in line for very many hours on end; they will doggedly put up with the rain and cold winds all night; they will josh with the coppers and stay cheerful; they will bring their children and grandchildren who will one day be able to tell their own children and grandchildren that they paid their last respects to Queen Elizabeth II, Elizabeth the Good.Left to right: West German Chancellor Helmut Kohl, Queen Elizabeth II, President Ronald Reagan and U.K. Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher at Buckingham Palace during a summit for world leaders, June 1984.Everyone would have perfectly understood if Her Majesty had decided to appoint Liz Truss as prime minister by a Zoom call. She had missed the Braemar Highland Games and had been suffering ill health, and a personal meeting wasn't strictly constitutionally necessary. As we now know -- and as she herself might well have suspected -- she only had two more days to live. But anyone who thought that she would put her personal comfort before what she saw as her duty doesn't understand the character of The Queen, the last of the Greatest Generation. When she was shot at six times as she rode down the Mall at the Trooping of the Colour in 1981, she didn't know the assailant was firing blanks, but she carried on the parade regardless. That is the kind of raw courage we took for granted from her.Britain has undergone several extremely difficult moments over the past 70 years as it has been transformed in almost every conceivable way. The Suez Crisis, only four years into the Queen's reign, forced us to come to terms with the loss of the largest empire in world history over the course of only a decade or so, yet we never responded to the imperial humiliation in the way that France did in Algeria, let alone the way Putin is doing in Ukraine. The 1970s saw the serious danger of Britain slipping into the position of a third-rank power, and the tough-love medicine that Margaret Thatcher imposed to reverse that trajectory in the 1980s led to violent strikes and riots, yet not to worse. The issue of race hatred is thankfully largely behind Britons now, but we must never forget that it occasionally caused civil unrest. The refusal of much of the Establishment to accept the result of the Brexit referendum toxified British politics for half a decade. British history since 1952 hasn't been plain sailing.Yet the knowledge that at the apex of our political system, our constitutional structure, our armed forces, our Commonwealth, our legal system and our national church stood a lady of irreproachable morals, who moreover confined her political involvement to advising, encouraging and warning but never to partisan politics, has exercised an inestimably positive influence on our public life. Liz Truss wasn't exaggerating when she perceptively said that the Queen was \"the rock upon which modern Britain was built.\"Although she was a small \"c\" conservative in many aspects of life, as many nonagenarians naturally are, The Queen was always exemplary in the way that she never interfered in politics, and Sir Keir Starmer's public statement showed that the Labour Party admired her just as much as the large-c Conservatives. In a country that is being riven by extreme partisan politics at the moment, as Britons face a post-Covid future and inflationary spirals, admiration for her was one of the few things that united both frontbenches in parliament. Now even that has gone.More than a century separated the births of The Queen's first prime minister, Winston Churchill, and her last, Liz Truss. Even more extraordinary, the 96 years of her life constitutes 39% of the existence of the United States as an independent country. Her love of the United States -- her only incognito holidays were taken in Kentucky -- was instrumental in keeping our most important alliance, the Special Relationship, as fresh as it is profound. We have only just begun to note the number of ways we are going to miss her, on both the international and the domestic stages.A millennium-old monarchy is a book of many chapters. One unusually long and glorious chapter has closed, and a new one is now opening. If Britain today seems somewhat untethered, mournful of course but also apprehensive, it is because King Charles III has almost impossibly large boots to fill. Yet he has been waiting for 70 of his 73 years for the role to devolve upon him and is therefore supremely ready for it. There is something immensely spiritually right that a role such as this is assumed during a period of mourning. Politicians take power feeling like they have won the lottery; monarchs accede to thrones mournful at the death of their parent. Succession at a time of somber reflection rather than exultant triumph is part of the genius of constitutional monarchy.Queen Elizabeth II in the House of Lords for the opening of Parliament, May 2015. She continued to fulfill her duties until the end, appointing her 15th prime minister, Liz Truss, on Sept 6.We as a nation made The Queen do things that we would never, ever, even consider doing ourselves. We expected her to do her job to the age of 96, when we retire at 65, and to keep doing it up to two days before her death. We expected her to invite bloodthirsty dictators to stay in her home, because British foreign policy interests required it. We expected her, aged 86, to stand on a boat in the Thames in the freezing rain during the diamond jubilee, waving for hour after hour. We expected her to shake the hand of a former IRA gunmen who approved the murder of her husband's uncle. We expected her to smile and charm and shake hands cordially, whatever she might privately have been feeling inside about her family's all-too-public traumas.She did all of it, and in 70 years she never once complained. She was the best of us.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":203,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9089411335,"gmtCreate":1650019818737,"gmtModify":1676534630208,"author":{"id":"3573788001234625","authorId":"3573788001234625","name":"Koalala","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e5b56f05d7e4c4896da404f0e1420ae1","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[Cry]&nbsp;","listText":"[Cry]&nbsp;","text":"[Cry]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9089411335","repostId":"2227167900","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2227167900","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1650036302,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2227167900?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-04-15 23:25","market":"us","language":"en","title":"If Musk's $43 Billion Twitter Takeover Falls Apart, Who Else Has Enough Money to Buy the Company?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2227167900","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"Not many people have, or can secure, the funds required to acquire TwitterElon Musk has submitted a ","content":"<html><head></head><body><ul><li>Not many people have, or can secure, the funds required to acquire Twitter</li></ul><p>Elon Musk has submitted a bid to buy <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TWTR\">Twitter</a> for $43 billion. The Tesla and SpaceX CEO has been buying equity in the social-media giant throughout most of 2022, and now he says he wants to take over the company in its entirety.</p><p>&#34;Twitter has extraordinary potential,&#34; Musk said. &#34;I will unlock it.&#34;</p><p>While Twitter says it will &#34;carefully review&#34; Musk&#39;s &#34;unsolicited&#34; bid, it poses at least two hypotheticals: Who would have enough money to buy it, and who might have the interest in actually doing so?</p><p>Musk is by far the richest person in the world, with a net worth of $273 billion, and spending $43 billion on a Twitter buyout wouldn&#39;t dent his fortune excessively, even were he to go it alone and pay cash, assuming a capacity to extract liquidity from, for example, his Tesla TSLA holdings without undermining valuation.</p><p>Musk&#39;s bid is also much higher than Twitter&#39;s $36.71 billion market cap as of Thursday morning (but, as Cowen analyst John Blackledge has suggested, hardly such a rich offer that the board, from a fiduciary-duty standpoint, would have a hard time batting it away).</p><p>Using Forbes&#39; billionaires list, 29 people possess the fortune to match or exceed Musk&#39;s $43 billion offer to buy Twitter. Those names include such titans of industry as <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMZN\">Amazon&#39;s </a> Jeff Bezos and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NKE\">Nike </a> founder Phil Knight, as well as Mike Bloomberg, Mark Zuckerberg and MacKenzie Scott.</p><p>Obviously, these names are only of those who theoretically, with their Forbes-tabulated wealth, could afford to purchase Twitter at a price in the vicinity of Musk&#39;s valuation, and by no means should one infer any of them has an interest in owning the company.</p><p>The 29 billionaires on the list who could match Musk&#39;s offer also include many tech moguls. Microsoft&#39;s <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSFT\">$(MSFT)$</a> Bill Gates, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ORCL\">Oracle&#39;s </a> Larry Ellison and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GOOGL\">Google&#39;s </a>(GOOGL) Sergey Brin all have tech backgrounds and the money to buy the company.</p><p>Others on the list, like Bernard Arnault, whose vast fashion-oriented empire includes the brands Louis Vuitton and Sephora, could also in theory afford a Twitter, experience and interest in the tech industry aside.</p><p>So who among these eligible buyers might hypothetically have the most interest?</p><p>Jeff Bezos is an obvious choice. With a $181 billion fortune, he can afford it, and he already has shown an interest in owning media properties as evidenced by his purchase of the Washington Post in 2013.</p><p>Michael Bloomberg, former Democratic presidential candidate and former mayor of New York, also fits the bill. Bloomberg&#39;s net worth exceeds $82 billion, and he also has a strong interest in media properties as, famously, a founder in 1981 of the financial information and media company Bloomberg LP.</p><p>An under-the-radar name for this exercise could be Zhang Yiming. As the co-founder of ByteDance, the company that owns social-media platform TikTok, Yiming is one of China&#39;s richest people, with a net worth of $49.5 billion.</p><p>Hypothetical bids from some of these billionaires would likely raise regulatory concerns. Any takeover plans from Zuckerberg or either of the Google founders, for example, could lead to concerns of monopolistic behavior.</p><p>It&#39;s unclear at this time whether Twitter is going to be receptive to any sort of a takeover.</p><p>Twitter reportedly is holding an all-hands meeting with employees on Thursday afternoon to discuss Musk&#39;s bid for the company.</p><p>Jefferies Equity Research Analyst Brent Thill opined that it could be a company, not an individual, who looks to buy Twitter. Thill named cloud-based software company <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CRM\">Salesforce</a> and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSFT\">Microsoft</a> as possibilities, citing Microsoft&#39;s recent success with LinkedIn.</p><p>&#34;It&#39;s hard to see who the next logical player would be,&#34; he said.</p><p>Thill was also skeptical that this is truly Musk&#39;s &#34;best and final&#34; bid  for Twitter.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>If Musk's $43 Billion Twitter Takeover Falls Apart, Who Else Has Enough Money to Buy the Company?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nIf Musk's $43 Billion Twitter Takeover Falls Apart, Who Else Has Enough Money to Buy the Company?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-04-15 23:25</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><ul><li>Not many people have, or can secure, the funds required to acquire Twitter</li></ul><p>Elon Musk has submitted a bid to buy <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TWTR\">Twitter</a> for $43 billion. The Tesla and SpaceX CEO has been buying equity in the social-media giant throughout most of 2022, and now he says he wants to take over the company in its entirety.</p><p>&#34;Twitter has extraordinary potential,&#34; Musk said. &#34;I will unlock it.&#34;</p><p>While Twitter says it will &#34;carefully review&#34; Musk&#39;s &#34;unsolicited&#34; bid, it poses at least two hypotheticals: Who would have enough money to buy it, and who might have the interest in actually doing so?</p><p>Musk is by far the richest person in the world, with a net worth of $273 billion, and spending $43 billion on a Twitter buyout wouldn&#39;t dent his fortune excessively, even were he to go it alone and pay cash, assuming a capacity to extract liquidity from, for example, his Tesla TSLA holdings without undermining valuation.</p><p>Musk&#39;s bid is also much higher than Twitter&#39;s $36.71 billion market cap as of Thursday morning (but, as Cowen analyst John Blackledge has suggested, hardly such a rich offer that the board, from a fiduciary-duty standpoint, would have a hard time batting it away).</p><p>Using Forbes&#39; billionaires list, 29 people possess the fortune to match or exceed Musk&#39;s $43 billion offer to buy Twitter. Those names include such titans of industry as <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMZN\">Amazon&#39;s </a> Jeff Bezos and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NKE\">Nike </a> founder Phil Knight, as well as Mike Bloomberg, Mark Zuckerberg and MacKenzie Scott.</p><p>Obviously, these names are only of those who theoretically, with their Forbes-tabulated wealth, could afford to purchase Twitter at a price in the vicinity of Musk&#39;s valuation, and by no means should one infer any of them has an interest in owning the company.</p><p>The 29 billionaires on the list who could match Musk&#39;s offer also include many tech moguls. Microsoft&#39;s <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSFT\">$(MSFT)$</a> Bill Gates, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ORCL\">Oracle&#39;s </a> Larry Ellison and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GOOGL\">Google&#39;s </a>(GOOGL) Sergey Brin all have tech backgrounds and the money to buy the company.</p><p>Others on the list, like Bernard Arnault, whose vast fashion-oriented empire includes the brands Louis Vuitton and Sephora, could also in theory afford a Twitter, experience and interest in the tech industry aside.</p><p>So who among these eligible buyers might hypothetically have the most interest?</p><p>Jeff Bezos is an obvious choice. With a $181 billion fortune, he can afford it, and he already has shown an interest in owning media properties as evidenced by his purchase of the Washington Post in 2013.</p><p>Michael Bloomberg, former Democratic presidential candidate and former mayor of New York, also fits the bill. Bloomberg&#39;s net worth exceeds $82 billion, and he also has a strong interest in media properties as, famously, a founder in 1981 of the financial information and media company Bloomberg LP.</p><p>An under-the-radar name for this exercise could be Zhang Yiming. As the co-founder of ByteDance, the company that owns social-media platform TikTok, Yiming is one of China&#39;s richest people, with a net worth of $49.5 billion.</p><p>Hypothetical bids from some of these billionaires would likely raise regulatory concerns. Any takeover plans from Zuckerberg or either of the Google founders, for example, could lead to concerns of monopolistic behavior.</p><p>It&#39;s unclear at this time whether Twitter is going to be receptive to any sort of a takeover.</p><p>Twitter reportedly is holding an all-hands meeting with employees on Thursday afternoon to discuss Musk&#39;s bid for the company.</p><p>Jefferies Equity Research Analyst Brent Thill opined that it could be a company, not an individual, who looks to buy Twitter. Thill named cloud-based software company <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CRM\">Salesforce</a> and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSFT\">Microsoft</a> as possibilities, citing Microsoft&#39;s recent success with LinkedIn.</p><p>&#34;It&#39;s hard to see who the next logical player would be,&#34; he said.</p><p>Thill was also skeptical that this is truly Musk&#39;s &#34;best and final&#34; bid  for Twitter.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","AMZN":"亚马逊","MSFT":"微软","BK4581":"高盛持仓","BK4555":"新能源车","GOOG":"谷歌","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓","BK4548":"巴美列捷福持仓","BK4551":"寇图资本持仓","ORCL":"甲骨文","CRM":"赛富时","TWTR":"Twitter","BK4574":"无人驾驶","TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2227167900","content_text":"Not many people have, or can secure, the funds required to acquire TwitterElon Musk has submitted a bid to buy Twitter for $43 billion. The Tesla and SpaceX CEO has been buying equity in the social-media giant throughout most of 2022, and now he says he wants to take over the company in its entirety.\"Twitter has extraordinary potential,\" Musk said. \"I will unlock it.\"While Twitter says it will \"carefully review\" Musk's \"unsolicited\" bid, it poses at least two hypotheticals: Who would have enough money to buy it, and who might have the interest in actually doing so?Musk is by far the richest person in the world, with a net worth of $273 billion, and spending $43 billion on a Twitter buyout wouldn't dent his fortune excessively, even were he to go it alone and pay cash, assuming a capacity to extract liquidity from, for example, his Tesla TSLA holdings without undermining valuation.Musk's bid is also much higher than Twitter's $36.71 billion market cap as of Thursday morning (but, as Cowen analyst John Blackledge has suggested, hardly such a rich offer that the board, from a fiduciary-duty standpoint, would have a hard time batting it away).Using Forbes' billionaires list, 29 people possess the fortune to match or exceed Musk's $43 billion offer to buy Twitter. Those names include such titans of industry as Amazon's  Jeff Bezos and Nike  founder Phil Knight, as well as Mike Bloomberg, Mark Zuckerberg and MacKenzie Scott.Obviously, these names are only of those who theoretically, with their Forbes-tabulated wealth, could afford to purchase Twitter at a price in the vicinity of Musk's valuation, and by no means should one infer any of them has an interest in owning the company.The 29 billionaires on the list who could match Musk's offer also include many tech moguls. Microsoft's $(MSFT)$ Bill Gates, Oracle's  Larry Ellison and Google's (GOOGL) Sergey Brin all have tech backgrounds and the money to buy the company.Others on the list, like Bernard Arnault, whose vast fashion-oriented empire includes the brands Louis Vuitton and Sephora, could also in theory afford a Twitter, experience and interest in the tech industry aside.So who among these eligible buyers might hypothetically have the most interest?Jeff Bezos is an obvious choice. With a $181 billion fortune, he can afford it, and he already has shown an interest in owning media properties as evidenced by his purchase of the Washington Post in 2013.Michael Bloomberg, former Democratic presidential candidate and former mayor of New York, also fits the bill. Bloomberg's net worth exceeds $82 billion, and he also has a strong interest in media properties as, famously, a founder in 1981 of the financial information and media company Bloomberg LP.An under-the-radar name for this exercise could be Zhang Yiming. As the co-founder of ByteDance, the company that owns social-media platform TikTok, Yiming is one of China's richest people, with a net worth of $49.5 billion.Hypothetical bids from some of these billionaires would likely raise regulatory concerns. Any takeover plans from Zuckerberg or either of the Google founders, for example, could lead to concerns of monopolistic behavior.It's unclear at this time whether Twitter is going to be receptive to any sort of a takeover.Twitter reportedly is holding an all-hands meeting with employees on Thursday afternoon to discuss Musk's bid for the company.Jefferies Equity Research Analyst Brent Thill opined that it could be a company, not an individual, who looks to buy Twitter. Thill named cloud-based software company Salesforce and Microsoft as possibilities, citing Microsoft's recent success with LinkedIn.\"It's hard to see who the next logical player would be,\" he said.Thill was also skeptical that this is truly Musk's \"best and final\" bid  for Twitter.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":268,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9098774107,"gmtCreate":1644245564093,"gmtModify":1676533903896,"author":{"id":"3573788001234625","authorId":"3573788001234625","name":"Koalala","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e5b56f05d7e4c4896da404f0e1420ae1","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[What]&nbsp;","listText":"[What]&nbsp;","text":"[What]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9098774107","repostId":"1187970199","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1187970199","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1644244867,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1187970199?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-02-07 22:41","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Hot Chinese ADRs Gained in Morning Trading","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1187970199","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"JD.com, RLX Technology, DiDi, Tencent Music, Bilibili climbed from 1% to 6%.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>JD.com, RLX Technology, DiDi, Tencent Music, Bilibili climbed from 1% to 6%.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/53b3ca4d437b7b3f0033b6f488cab646\" tg-width=\"382\" tg-height=\"642\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Hot Chinese ADRs Gained in Morning Trading</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHot Chinese ADRs Gained in Morning Trading\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-02-07 22:41</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>JD.com, RLX Technology, DiDi, Tencent Music, Bilibili climbed from 1% to 6%.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/53b3ca4d437b7b3f0033b6f488cab646\" tg-width=\"382\" tg-height=\"642\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"DIDI":"滴滴(已退市)","PDD":"拼多多","RLX":"雾芯科技"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1187970199","content_text":"JD.com, RLX Technology, DiDi, Tencent Music, Bilibili climbed from 1% to 6%.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":385,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9009419427,"gmtCreate":1640752929187,"gmtModify":1676533539263,"author":{"id":"3573788001234625","authorId":"3573788001234625","name":"Koalala","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e5b56f05d7e4c4896da404f0e1420ae1","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[Cool]&nbsp;","listText":"[Cool]&nbsp;","text":"[Cool]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9009419427","repostId":"1198739062","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1198739062","pubTimestamp":1640749914,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1198739062?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-12-29 11:51","market":"us","language":"en","title":"PayPal Has a Strong Story If You Look Beyond the Noise","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1198739062","media":"InvestorPlace","summary":"The last six months of 2021 have not been kind to investors in PayPal (NASDAQ:PYPL) stock.\nFrom its ","content":"<p>The last six months of 2021 have not been kind to investors in&nbsp;<b>PayPal</b>&nbsp;(NASDAQ:<b><u>PYPL</u></b>) stock.</p>\n<p>From its peak closing price of $310.16 per share, PYPL stock has dipped nearly 40%&nbsp;and now sits at $190.1.</p>\n<p>Investors have some reason to believe that PYPL stock was overvalued. For example, investors are becoming concerned that PayPal’s supremacy in digital payment solutions is being successfully eroded by competition.</p>\n<p>Also, the company’s long-anticipated breakup with&nbsp;<b>eBay</b>&nbsp;(NASDAQ:<b><u>EBAY</u></b>)reached its conclusion&nbsp;in June. This was really a case of two companies that are moving in different directions.</p>\n<p>As Dana Blankenhorn points out, PayPal is now a “fully grown banking operation.” Although the company delivered a solid first earnings report with significantly reduced eBay revenue, investors may be concerned about two consecutive quarters of slowing growth.</p>\n<p>The company is also facing questions about the consumer protections (or lack thereof) in its push into the&nbsp;buy now pay later (BNPL) arena.</p>\n<p>Specifically, the&nbsp;Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB)&nbsp;is looking&nbsp;into how PayPal and other BNPL companies may be using user data and how these companies may be getting around existing consumer protection laws.</p>\n<p>That’s a lot for investors to process. As a company still recognized as part of the technology sector, PayPal faces the same headwinds that all tech stocks are enduring.</p>\n<p>With that said, the sell-off in PayPal looks overdone. And that’s why opportunistic investors should consider PYPL stock a solid choice as they look ahead to 2022.</p>\n<p>The Business Model is Sound</p>\n<p>The biggest reason I believe that the sell-off in PayPal is overdone is that none of the issues mentioned above changes the overall narrative for PayPal. The company remains one of the unquestioned leaders in the digital payment sector. In fact, it has an enviable market penetration rate of around 75%.</p>\n<p>And, as its recent partnership with&nbsp;<b>Amazon</b>&nbsp;(NASDAQ:<b><u>AMZN</u></b>) shows, it has no problem adding clients to its roster. Specifically, starting in 2022 Amazon will offer the Venmo payment option at checkout on its webpage as well as the Amazon shopping app.</p>\n<p>Another reason to be bullish about PYPL stock can be found in the company’s financials.</p>\n<p>In the first three quarters of 2021, PayPal has reported revenue of $18.45 billion. That’s 13% higher on a year-over-year basis and puts the company well on pace to eclipse the $21.46 billion in revenue it recorded in all of FY 2020.</p>\n<p>The company is forecasting revenue to come in at $25.36 billion. And a similar story is on display with the company’s earnings which are up 17% on a year-over-year basis.</p>\n<p>Looking ahead to 2022, PayPal estimates its revenue will increase 18%. That’s slightly less than the 19% analysts were forecasting. That isn’t the growth of a struggling company.</p>\n<p>If you’re a fan of free cash flow (FCF) as a metric of financial health, you should pay attention to what Mark Hake recently wrote about how&nbsp;PayPal’s strong FCF&nbsp;makes the stock an undervalued option.</p>\n<p>PYPL Stock Is a Clear Buy-the-Dip Candidate</p>\n<p>If you don’t buy into that from a technical standpoint, consider the reaction of the analyst community. Since PayPal reported earnings, at least 20 analysts have lowered their price target for PYPL stock. However, it’s important to note that in every case the new price target is higher than the stock’s current price.</p>\n<p>As any investor knows, that&nbsp;doesn’t&nbsp;mean that PYPL stock&nbsp;doesn’t&nbsp;have further to drop. Investors will do what they want. However, it does seem that the stock has absorbed all the&nbsp;bad news.</p>\n<p>PayPal needs a bullish catalyst, and that might come when it reports earnings at the beginning of February. That’s a long winter’s night away, but it shouldn’t stop you from opening or adding to your position in PYPL stock.</p>","source":"lsy1606302653667","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>PayPal Has a Strong Story If You Look Beyond the Noise</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nPayPal Has a Strong Story If You Look Beyond the Noise\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-12-29 11:51 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://investorplace.com/2021/12/pypl-stock-looks-like-strong-buy-if-you-tune-out-noise/><strong>InvestorPlace</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The last six months of 2021 have not been kind to investors in PayPal (NASDAQ:PYPL) stock.\nFrom its peak closing price of $310.16 per share, PYPL stock has dipped nearly 40% and now sits at $190.1.\n...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://investorplace.com/2021/12/pypl-stock-looks-like-strong-buy-if-you-tune-out-noise/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"PYPL":"PayPal"},"source_url":"https://investorplace.com/2021/12/pypl-stock-looks-like-strong-buy-if-you-tune-out-noise/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1198739062","content_text":"The last six months of 2021 have not been kind to investors in PayPal (NASDAQ:PYPL) stock.\nFrom its peak closing price of $310.16 per share, PYPL stock has dipped nearly 40% and now sits at $190.1.\nInvestors have some reason to believe that PYPL stock was overvalued. For example, investors are becoming concerned that PayPal’s supremacy in digital payment solutions is being successfully eroded by competition.\nAlso, the company’s long-anticipated breakup with eBay (NASDAQ:EBAY)reached its conclusion in June. This was really a case of two companies that are moving in different directions.\nAs Dana Blankenhorn points out, PayPal is now a “fully grown banking operation.” Although the company delivered a solid first earnings report with significantly reduced eBay revenue, investors may be concerned about two consecutive quarters of slowing growth.\nThe company is also facing questions about the consumer protections (or lack thereof) in its push into the buy now pay later (BNPL) arena.\nSpecifically, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) is looking into how PayPal and other BNPL companies may be using user data and how these companies may be getting around existing consumer protection laws.\nThat’s a lot for investors to process. As a company still recognized as part of the technology sector, PayPal faces the same headwinds that all tech stocks are enduring.\nWith that said, the sell-off in PayPal looks overdone. And that’s why opportunistic investors should consider PYPL stock a solid choice as they look ahead to 2022.\nThe Business Model is Sound\nThe biggest reason I believe that the sell-off in PayPal is overdone is that none of the issues mentioned above changes the overall narrative for PayPal. The company remains one of the unquestioned leaders in the digital payment sector. In fact, it has an enviable market penetration rate of around 75%.\nAnd, as its recent partnership with Amazon (NASDAQ:AMZN) shows, it has no problem adding clients to its roster. Specifically, starting in 2022 Amazon will offer the Venmo payment option at checkout on its webpage as well as the Amazon shopping app.\nAnother reason to be bullish about PYPL stock can be found in the company’s financials.\nIn the first three quarters of 2021, PayPal has reported revenue of $18.45 billion. That’s 13% higher on a year-over-year basis and puts the company well on pace to eclipse the $21.46 billion in revenue it recorded in all of FY 2020.\nThe company is forecasting revenue to come in at $25.36 billion. And a similar story is on display with the company’s earnings which are up 17% on a year-over-year basis.\nLooking ahead to 2022, PayPal estimates its revenue will increase 18%. That’s slightly less than the 19% analysts were forecasting. That isn’t the growth of a struggling company.\nIf you’re a fan of free cash flow (FCF) as a metric of financial health, you should pay attention to what Mark Hake recently wrote about how PayPal’s strong FCF makes the stock an undervalued option.\nPYPL Stock Is a Clear Buy-the-Dip Candidate\nIf you don’t buy into that from a technical standpoint, consider the reaction of the analyst community. Since PayPal reported earnings, at least 20 analysts have lowered their price target for PYPL stock. However, it’s important to note that in every case the new price target is higher than the stock’s current price.\nAs any investor knows, that doesn’t mean that PYPL stock doesn’t have further to drop. Investors will do what they want. However, it does seem that the stock has absorbed all the bad news.\nPayPal needs a bullish catalyst, and that might come when it reports earnings at the beginning of February. That’s a long winter’s night away, but it shouldn’t stop you from opening or adding to your position in PYPL stock.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":439,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":389644264,"gmtCreate":1612773171258,"gmtModify":1704873975001,"author":{"id":"3573788001234625","authorId":"3573788001234625","name":"Koalala","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e5b56f05d7e4c4896da404f0e1420ae1","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/JYEU.SI\">$Lendlease Global Commercial REIT(JYEU.SI)$</a>Hopefully it will recover soon. I am still hopeful of this REITs.&nbsp;","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/JYEU.SI\">$Lendlease Global Commercial REIT(JYEU.SI)$</a>Hopefully it will recover soon. I am still hopeful of this REITs.&nbsp;","text":"$Lendlease Global Commercial REIT(JYEU.SI)$Hopefully it will recover soon. I am still hopeful of this REITs.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/389644264","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":13,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9935448985,"gmtCreate":1663127313648,"gmtModify":1676537210157,"author":{"id":"3573788001234625","authorId":"3573788001234625","name":"Koalala","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e5b56f05d7e4c4896da404f0e1420ae1","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[Cool]&nbsp;","listText":"[Cool]&nbsp;","text":"[Cool]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9935448985","repostId":"2267566005","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2267566005","pubTimestamp":1663118397,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2267566005?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-09-14 09:19","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Biden Celebration of Economy Skips Inflation That Haunts It","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2267566005","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"Republicans hammer Biden as inflation runs hot into midtermsPresident focuses speech on climate chan","content":"<html><head></head><body><ul><li>Republicans hammer Biden as inflation runs hot into midterms</li><li>President focuses speech on climate change, drug companies</li></ul><p>President Joe Biden ignored worse-than-expected US inflation data that roiled markets during a planned celebration for his signature climate-and-tax law.</p><p>The law Biden celebrated Tuesday is called the Inflation Reduction Act, and the White House has repeatedly said tackling inflation -- a political liability for Democrats before the November midterms -- is the president’s top priority. But after the Labor Department reported, hours before the event on the South Lawn of the White House, that price growth accelerated from July to August, Biden largely focused elsewhere in his remarks: curbing climate change, defeating the drug lobby, his Republican opposition, even guns.</p><p>“I believe Republicans could have and should have joined us on this bill,” Biden said during the ceremony that took on a party-like atmosphere with a large crowd and musical performances.</p><p>He didn’t mention the latest inflation data at all during his wide-ranging speech.</p><p>As Biden was speaking, a broad-based selloff sent equities to their worst day in more than two years as fears mounted that the Federal Reserve will adopt an even more aggressive pace of monetary tightening.</p><p>Republicans leveled fresh attacks at Biden’s economic policies and accused the White House of political tone-deafness.</p><p>“They could not look more out of touch if they tried,” Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell said Tuesday.</p><p>“Biden and Democrats throwing themselves a party for raising taxes on families during a recession proves just how out of touch they are,” Republican National Committee Chairwoman Ronna McDaniel said in a statement.</p><p>Asked on Tuesday evening if he was worried about inflation, Biden said, “I’m not, because we’re talking about one-tenth of one percent.”</p><p>“The stock market doesn’t necessarily reflect the state of the economy, as you well know,” he told reporters after voting in Wilmington, Delaware. “The economy is still strong, unemployment is low, jobs are up, manufacturing is good. So I think we’re gonna be fine.”</p><p>Earlier in the day, Biden said in a statement that the latest data showed “progress” toward curbing price gains but acknowledged more work is needed.</p><p>“Today’s data show more progress in bringing global inflation down in the US economy,” Biden said, hailing a drop in gas prices and adding, “It will take more time and resolve to bring inflation down.”</p><p>Headline consumer prices increased in August by 0.1%, hotter than a forecast decline of the same figure. Core inflation, a measure that strips out volatile fuel and food costs and is closely watched by the Fed, rose by 0.6%, double the forecast. Year-over-year inflation dropped for the second month, to 8.3%, but also exceeded the forecast of 8.1%.</p><p>Tuesday’s price growth report is a sign of a persistent headwind facing Biden and Democrats before the Nov. 8 midterms and cuts against other positive economic data that boosted their prospects for retaining control of at least one chamber of Congress.</p><p>They’ve scrambled to ease price pressures by trying to tackle supply chain woes, releasing crude from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve and passing a tax-and-spending package aimed at cooling inflation in the long run.</p><p>The effect of the law passed by Democrats last month -- without any Republican support -- will take years to fully sink in and have only a modest impact on price gains.</p><p>The White House event was scheduled weeks ago as the US saw a steady decline in gasoline prices, which have dropped to an average of $3.71 a gallon nationally from a high of $5.02 in June.</p><p>That drop, though, was offset by price hikes elsewhere, including in shelter costs. The August increase brought shelter inflation over the last 12 months to 6.3%, the highest over any such stretch since 1986.</p><p>While the decline in gasoline prices has tempered what would otherwise have been even hotter price growth, Biden is not out of the woods there, either.</p><p>US officials worry that a rebound in oil prices could be coming if European Union sanctions due to kick in later this year aren’t accompanied by other measures, such as a price cap on the purchase of Russian oil.</p></body></html>","source":"lsy1584095487587","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Biden Celebration of Economy Skips Inflation That Haunts It</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBiden Celebration of Economy Skips Inflation That Haunts It\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-09-14 09:19 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-09-13/biden-says-more-time-needed-to-cut-inflation-as-prices-run-hot><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Republicans hammer Biden as inflation runs hot into midtermsPresident focuses speech on climate change, drug companiesPresident Joe Biden ignored worse-than-expected US inflation data that roiled ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-09-13/biden-says-more-time-needed-to-cut-inflation-as-prices-run-hot\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index"},"source_url":"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-09-13/biden-says-more-time-needed-to-cut-inflation-as-prices-run-hot","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2267566005","content_text":"Republicans hammer Biden as inflation runs hot into midtermsPresident focuses speech on climate change, drug companiesPresident Joe Biden ignored worse-than-expected US inflation data that roiled markets during a planned celebration for his signature climate-and-tax law.The law Biden celebrated Tuesday is called the Inflation Reduction Act, and the White House has repeatedly said tackling inflation -- a political liability for Democrats before the November midterms -- is the president’s top priority. But after the Labor Department reported, hours before the event on the South Lawn of the White House, that price growth accelerated from July to August, Biden largely focused elsewhere in his remarks: curbing climate change, defeating the drug lobby, his Republican opposition, even guns.“I believe Republicans could have and should have joined us on this bill,” Biden said during the ceremony that took on a party-like atmosphere with a large crowd and musical performances.He didn’t mention the latest inflation data at all during his wide-ranging speech.As Biden was speaking, a broad-based selloff sent equities to their worst day in more than two years as fears mounted that the Federal Reserve will adopt an even more aggressive pace of monetary tightening.Republicans leveled fresh attacks at Biden’s economic policies and accused the White House of political tone-deafness.“They could not look more out of touch if they tried,” Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell said Tuesday.“Biden and Democrats throwing themselves a party for raising taxes on families during a recession proves just how out of touch they are,” Republican National Committee Chairwoman Ronna McDaniel said in a statement.Asked on Tuesday evening if he was worried about inflation, Biden said, “I’m not, because we’re talking about one-tenth of one percent.”“The stock market doesn’t necessarily reflect the state of the economy, as you well know,” he told reporters after voting in Wilmington, Delaware. “The economy is still strong, unemployment is low, jobs are up, manufacturing is good. So I think we’re gonna be fine.”Earlier in the day, Biden said in a statement that the latest data showed “progress” toward curbing price gains but acknowledged more work is needed.“Today’s data show more progress in bringing global inflation down in the US economy,” Biden said, hailing a drop in gas prices and adding, “It will take more time and resolve to bring inflation down.”Headline consumer prices increased in August by 0.1%, hotter than a forecast decline of the same figure. Core inflation, a measure that strips out volatile fuel and food costs and is closely watched by the Fed, rose by 0.6%, double the forecast. Year-over-year inflation dropped for the second month, to 8.3%, but also exceeded the forecast of 8.1%.Tuesday’s price growth report is a sign of a persistent headwind facing Biden and Democrats before the Nov. 8 midterms and cuts against other positive economic data that boosted their prospects for retaining control of at least one chamber of Congress.They’ve scrambled to ease price pressures by trying to tackle supply chain woes, releasing crude from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve and passing a tax-and-spending package aimed at cooling inflation in the long run.The effect of the law passed by Democrats last month -- without any Republican support -- will take years to fully sink in and have only a modest impact on price gains.The White House event was scheduled weeks ago as the US saw a steady decline in gasoline prices, which have dropped to an average of $3.71 a gallon nationally from a high of $5.02 in June.That drop, though, was offset by price hikes elsewhere, including in shelter costs. The August increase brought shelter inflation over the last 12 months to 6.3%, the highest over any such stretch since 1986.While the decline in gasoline prices has tempered what would otherwise have been even hotter price growth, Biden is not out of the woods there, either.US officials worry that a rebound in oil prices could be coming if European Union sanctions due to kick in later this year aren’t accompanied by other measures, such as a price cap on the purchase of Russian oil.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":285,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":184834775,"gmtCreate":1623704596297,"gmtModify":1704208962583,"author":{"id":"3573788001234625","authorId":"3573788001234625","name":"Koalala","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e5b56f05d7e4c4896da404f0e1420ae1","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Everything will be okay","listText":"Everything will be okay","text":"Everything will be okay","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/184834775","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":409,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":382063028,"gmtCreate":1613306507764,"gmtModify":1704879841316,"author":{"id":"3573788001234625","authorId":"3573788001234625","name":"Koalala","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e5b56f05d7e4c4896da404f0e1420ae1","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Buy bitcoins!&nbsp;","listText":"Buy bitcoins!&nbsp;","text":"Buy bitcoins!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/382063028","repostId":"1179092967","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1179092967","pubTimestamp":1613100617,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1179092967?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-02-12 11:30","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Not Just Tesla: Why Big Companies are Buying into Crypto-Mania","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1179092967","media":"barrons","summary":"For months, there has beena consistent trickle of newsabout mainstream businesses getting involved in cryptocurrencies. In the past week, it has turned into a flood, helping to push the price of Bitcoin to a record of $48,297 on Thursday.The most buzzworthy move came from Tesla , which disclosed on Monday that it hasbought $1.5 billion worth of Bitcointo hold on its balance sheet. The company plans to let consumers use the currency to pay for cars.Mastercard  said on Wednesday that it will let m","content":"<p>For months, there has beena consistent trickle of newsabout mainstream businesses getting involved in cryptocurrencies. In the past week, it has turned into a flood, helping to push the price of Bitcoin to a record of $48,297 on Thursday.</p><p>The most buzzworthy move came from Tesla (ticker: TSLA), which disclosed on Monday that it hasbought $1.5 billion worth of Bitcointo hold on its balance sheet. The company plans to let consumers use the currency to pay for cars.</p><p>But Tesla isn’t the only one. On Thursday, BNY Mellon (BK), the oldest bank in the U.S.,said it will hold and transfer cryptocurrencies for customers. “Growing client demand for digital assets, maturity of advanced solutions, and improving regulatory clarity present a tremendous opportunity for us to extend our current service offerings to this emerging field,” said Roman Regelman, the bank’s CEO of asset servicing and head of digital.</p><p>Mastercard (MA) said on Wednesday that it will let merchants accept some cryptocurrencies through its network later this year. The payments will be converted to traditional money before it enters the companies’ systems.Twitter(TWTR) is also considering a Bitcoin investment. And Square (SQ) has already put some on its balance sheet, as well as given users of its Cash App access to buy the cryptocurrency.</p><p>Why is this happening now? Cryptocurrencies are still not particularly useful outside of a very few cases, such as cross-border transactions. Even there, they haven’t fully taken hold.</p><p>There are at least four big reasons corporations are diving in.</p><p>One is that some company founders believe in Bitcoin. Their excitement about the asset has convinced them that their companies need to be involved, or have cryptocurrency investments, even if Bitcoin isn’t really the core of their operations. That appears to be the case for Tesla and its CEO Elon Musk, and for a software company calledMicrostrategyand its CEO, Michael Saylor.</p><p>Microstrategy, whose entire market capitalization was below $1 billion early last year, now owns more than $2 billion of Bitcoin, and its market cap is now just under $10 billion. Saylor told<i>Barron’s</i>&nbsp;in an interview last yearthat he sees Bitcoin as a hedge against monetary debasement and inflation.</p><p>Square CEO Jack Dorsey ‘s fascination with Bitcoin also likely sped Square’s adoption. He has spoken about his interest in the currency for years.</p><p>Tesla’s purchase of Bitcoin is strong marketing for the company and the currency, said Dan Morehead, founder of the crypto hedge fund Pantera Capital. But it won’t likely change the way Bitcoin is used. “Tesla sells a half a million cars a year,” he said. “If they sold 4% in Bitcoin, I’d be surprised.” Morehead thinks Bitoin’s growing use for cross-border payments is much more exciting from a practical perspective.</p><p>Other companies are getting into Bitcoin because of customer demand. That appears to be the case for BNY Mellon, which is not known for making risky bets on new technologies. It could stay out of the industry altogether, but more institutional investors are buying Bitcoin and need somewhere to put it.</p><p>And the infrastructure around Bitcoin has grown, so that it now more closely resembles the systems used in the rest of the world of finance.. Big companies now insure cryptocurrencies or—as in the case ofJPMorgan Chase(JPM)—offer services to cryptocurrency businesses, even if most still don’t hold Bitcoin on their own balance sheets.</p><p>A third reason is increasing government acceptance of the trend. BNY cited greater regulatory clarity around Bitcoin as one reason it is diving in. The U.S. government has taken a mostly laissez-faire approach to regulating digital assets even as many of the illegal activities that cryptocurrency has been associated with in the past have continued. Without at least the tacit approval of regulators, crypto couldn’t have landed on the balance sheets of so many companies.</p><p>A fourth reason cryptocurrencies are gaining hold in corporate boardrooms is that they serve multiple purposes. That gives corporations several different rationales to hold the coins, or offer related services. Cryptocurrencies have the potential to go well beyond Bitcoin’s initial premise as a way to send money without financial intermediaries. So-called stablecoins, whose value is meant to track fiat currencies, could allow for faster transactions for some kinds of financial services, for instance.</p><p>Visa(V) andMasterCardseem like the last places in the world that Bitcoin would take hold given that Bitcoin was created to eliminate the middlemen in finance. Few companies fill the role of middleman as perfectly as the credit-card processors. Visa, however, thinks that cryptocurrencies are useful for many other purposes, and its trusted brand makes it an important player, according to Cuy Sheffield, head of crypto at the company.</p><p>“We’ve seen growing demand from clients across the world that want to be able to plug in and use these networks, but they want a global, neutral, trusted brand, to help them be able to do that,” Sheffield said in an interview. Visa said last week it has created software that allows bank customers to buy and hold cryptocurrencies through lenders’ websites.</p><p>Will old-line financial companies be the biggest beneficiaries of the crypto “revolution”? Michael Venuto, the chief investment officer of Toroso Investments, doesn’t think it will be easy for them to dominate this new world. Toroso created theAmplify Transformational Data SharingETF (ticker: BLOK), which invests in public companies involved in the technology behind Bitcoin.</p><p>“In terms of the self-referenced paradox of the old economy accepting the blockchain, it is simply inevitable,” Venuto wrote in an email to<i>Barron’s</i>. “If they don’t explore the blockchain they will be extinct. They understand that, but they are not aware of how big the changes will be or how fast they will happen. They have to evolve, but evolution can be messy.”</p>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Not Just Tesla: Why Big Companies are Buying into Crypto-Mania</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nNot Just Tesla: Why Big Companies are Buying into Crypto-Mania\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-02-12 11:30 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.barrons.com/articles/not-just-tesla-why-big-companies-are-buying-into-crypto-mania-51613069805?mod=hp_LEADSUPP_1><strong>barrons</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>For months, there has beena consistent trickle of newsabout mainstream businesses getting involved in cryptocurrencies. In the past week, it has turned into a flood, helping to push the price of ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/not-just-tesla-why-big-companies-are-buying-into-crypto-mania-51613069805?mod=hp_LEADSUPP_1\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/414360f2ef7b5c785cb936b4a9b53a44","relate_stocks":{"GBTC":"Grayscale Bitcoin Trust","TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/not-just-tesla-why-big-companies-are-buying-into-crypto-mania-51613069805?mod=hp_LEADSUPP_1","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1179092967","content_text":"For months, there has beena consistent trickle of newsabout mainstream businesses getting involved in cryptocurrencies. In the past week, it has turned into a flood, helping to push the price of Bitcoin to a record of $48,297 on Thursday.The most buzzworthy move came from Tesla (ticker: TSLA), which disclosed on Monday that it hasbought $1.5 billion worth of Bitcointo hold on its balance sheet. The company plans to let consumers use the currency to pay for cars.But Tesla isn’t the only one. On Thursday, BNY Mellon (BK), the oldest bank in the U.S.,said it will hold and transfer cryptocurrencies for customers. “Growing client demand for digital assets, maturity of advanced solutions, and improving regulatory clarity present a tremendous opportunity for us to extend our current service offerings to this emerging field,” said Roman Regelman, the bank’s CEO of asset servicing and head of digital.Mastercard (MA) said on Wednesday that it will let merchants accept some cryptocurrencies through its network later this year. The payments will be converted to traditional money before it enters the companies’ systems.Twitter(TWTR) is also considering a Bitcoin investment. And Square (SQ) has already put some on its balance sheet, as well as given users of its Cash App access to buy the cryptocurrency.Why is this happening now? Cryptocurrencies are still not particularly useful outside of a very few cases, such as cross-border transactions. Even there, they haven’t fully taken hold.There are at least four big reasons corporations are diving in.One is that some company founders believe in Bitcoin. Their excitement about the asset has convinced them that their companies need to be involved, or have cryptocurrency investments, even if Bitcoin isn’t really the core of their operations. That appears to be the case for Tesla and its CEO Elon Musk, and for a software company calledMicrostrategyand its CEO, Michael Saylor.Microstrategy, whose entire market capitalization was below $1 billion early last year, now owns more than $2 billion of Bitcoin, and its market cap is now just under $10 billion. Saylor toldBarron’s in an interview last yearthat he sees Bitcoin as a hedge against monetary debasement and inflation.Square CEO Jack Dorsey ‘s fascination with Bitcoin also likely sped Square’s adoption. He has spoken about his interest in the currency for years.Tesla’s purchase of Bitcoin is strong marketing for the company and the currency, said Dan Morehead, founder of the crypto hedge fund Pantera Capital. But it won’t likely change the way Bitcoin is used. “Tesla sells a half a million cars a year,” he said. “If they sold 4% in Bitcoin, I’d be surprised.” Morehead thinks Bitoin’s growing use for cross-border payments is much more exciting from a practical perspective.Other companies are getting into Bitcoin because of customer demand. That appears to be the case for BNY Mellon, which is not known for making risky bets on new technologies. It could stay out of the industry altogether, but more institutional investors are buying Bitcoin and need somewhere to put it.And the infrastructure around Bitcoin has grown, so that it now more closely resembles the systems used in the rest of the world of finance.. Big companies now insure cryptocurrencies or—as in the case ofJPMorgan Chase(JPM)—offer services to cryptocurrency businesses, even if most still don’t hold Bitcoin on their own balance sheets.A third reason is increasing government acceptance of the trend. BNY cited greater regulatory clarity around Bitcoin as one reason it is diving in. The U.S. government has taken a mostly laissez-faire approach to regulating digital assets even as many of the illegal activities that cryptocurrency has been associated with in the past have continued. Without at least the tacit approval of regulators, crypto couldn’t have landed on the balance sheets of so many companies.A fourth reason cryptocurrencies are gaining hold in corporate boardrooms is that they serve multiple purposes. That gives corporations several different rationales to hold the coins, or offer related services. Cryptocurrencies have the potential to go well beyond Bitcoin’s initial premise as a way to send money without financial intermediaries. So-called stablecoins, whose value is meant to track fiat currencies, could allow for faster transactions for some kinds of financial services, for instance.Visa(V) andMasterCardseem like the last places in the world that Bitcoin would take hold given that Bitcoin was created to eliminate the middlemen in finance. Few companies fill the role of middleman as perfectly as the credit-card processors. Visa, however, thinks that cryptocurrencies are useful for many other purposes, and its trusted brand makes it an important player, according to Cuy Sheffield, head of crypto at the company.“We’ve seen growing demand from clients across the world that want to be able to plug in and use these networks, but they want a global, neutral, trusted brand, to help them be able to do that,” Sheffield said in an interview. Visa said last week it has created software that allows bank customers to buy and hold cryptocurrencies through lenders’ websites.Will old-line financial companies be the biggest beneficiaries of the crypto “revolution”? Michael Venuto, the chief investment officer of Toroso Investments, doesn’t think it will be easy for them to dominate this new world. Toroso created theAmplify Transformational Data SharingETF (ticker: BLOK), which invests in public companies involved in the technology behind Bitcoin.“In terms of the self-referenced paradox of the old economy accepting the blockchain, it is simply inevitable,” Venuto wrote in an email toBarron’s. “If they don’t explore the blockchain they will be extinct. They understand that, but they are not aware of how big the changes will be or how fast they will happen. They have to evolve, but evolution can be messy.”","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":153,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[{"author":{"id":"3550798757796905","authorId":"3550798757796905","name":"howeixiong","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fea539af5db0091afc3fa5280f22719a","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"content":"Going to look into it","text":"Going to look into it","html":"Going to look into it"}],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9095647955,"gmtCreate":1644910604612,"gmtModify":1676533974813,"author":{"id":"3573788001234625","authorId":"3573788001234625","name":"Koalala","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e5b56f05d7e4c4896da404f0e1420ae1","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[Cool]&nbsp;","listText":"[Cool]&nbsp;","text":"[Cool]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9095647955","repostId":"2211686008","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2211686008","pubTimestamp":1644908201,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2211686008?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-02-15 14:56","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Cathie Wood’s Ark Bought Sea Shares as Gaming Firm Plunged","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2211686008","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"(Bloomberg) -- Cathie Wood took advantage of a record slump in Sea Ltd., snapping up more of the gam","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>(Bloomberg) -- Cathie Wood took advantage of a record slump in <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SE\">Sea Ltd</a>., snapping up more of the gaming firm’s shares after India banned <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> of its products.</p><p>Wood’s thematic investing firm ARK Investment Management LLC bought more than 145,000 Sea shares on Monday, with the Ark Next Generation Internet ETF buying up the bulk, according to the firm’s daily trading updates compiled by Bloomberg. Sea closed down 18% in New York after India banned its marquee game Free Fire, extending a selloff in its shares to 65% from an Oct. 19 peak.</p><p>Analysts have cited a slowdown in gaming revenues, user growth and pressures on its e-commerce business among the factors weighing on Sea’s shares. India’s move to ban 54 apps due to security concerns, including Sea’s Free Fire, have only added to the headwinds.</p><p>“The ban certainly clouds Sea’s outlook a little, not just for gaming but e-commerce too,” said Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Nathan Naidu. He added that it also raised concerns about the firm’s ability to expand into new markets.</p><p>Ark has been accumulating Sea shares since the start of this year and the frequency of its purchases increased this month. Ark ETFs have bought Sea shares almost every day in February, Bloomberg-compiled data showed.</p><p>Sea -- founded in Singapore by Chinese-born founders who became Singaporean citizens -- has been growing its gaming and e-commerce business globally with early backing from Tencent Holdings Ltd., the largest shareholder of the company.</p></body></html>","source":"yahoofinance","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Cathie Wood’s Ark Bought Sea Shares as Gaming Firm Plunged</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nCathie Wood’s Ark Bought Sea Shares as Gaming Firm Plunged\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-02-15 14:56 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/cathie-wood-ark-bought-sea-045441291.html><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>(Bloomberg) -- Cathie Wood took advantage of a record slump in Sea Ltd., snapping up more of the gaming firm’s shares after India banned one of its products.Wood’s thematic investing firm ARK ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/cathie-wood-ark-bought-sea-045441291.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BK4544":"ARK ETF合集","ARKK":"ARK Innovation ETF","SE":"Sea Ltd"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/cathie-wood-ark-bought-sea-045441291.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5f26f4a48f9cb3e29be4d71d3ba8c038","article_id":"2211686008","content_text":"(Bloomberg) -- Cathie Wood took advantage of a record slump in Sea Ltd., snapping up more of the gaming firm’s shares after India banned one of its products.Wood’s thematic investing firm ARK Investment Management LLC bought more than 145,000 Sea shares on Monday, with the Ark Next Generation Internet ETF buying up the bulk, according to the firm’s daily trading updates compiled by Bloomberg. Sea closed down 18% in New York after India banned its marquee game Free Fire, extending a selloff in its shares to 65% from an Oct. 19 peak.Analysts have cited a slowdown in gaming revenues, user growth and pressures on its e-commerce business among the factors weighing on Sea’s shares. India’s move to ban 54 apps due to security concerns, including Sea’s Free Fire, have only added to the headwinds.“The ban certainly clouds Sea’s outlook a little, not just for gaming but e-commerce too,” said Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Nathan Naidu. He added that it also raised concerns about the firm’s ability to expand into new markets.Ark has been accumulating Sea shares since the start of this year and the frequency of its purchases increased this month. Ark ETFs have bought Sea shares almost every day in February, Bloomberg-compiled data showed.Sea -- founded in Singapore by Chinese-born founders who became Singaporean citizens -- has been growing its gaming and e-commerce business globally with early backing from Tencent Holdings Ltd., the largest shareholder of the company.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":228,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":324393001,"gmtCreate":1615959500503,"gmtModify":1704788953107,"author":{"id":"3573788001234625","authorId":"3573788001234625","name":"Koalala","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e5b56f05d7e4c4896da404f0e1420ae1","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSM\">$Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing(TSM)$</a>after matching the company history it makes me want to hold this stock for long and add during the Low.&nbsp;","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSM\">$Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing(TSM)$</a>after matching the company history it makes me want to hold this stock for long and add during the Low.&nbsp;","text":"$Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing(TSM)$after matching the company history it makes me want to hold this stock for long and add during the Low.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/324393001","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":302,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9968527965,"gmtCreate":1669260979357,"gmtModify":1676538175944,"author":{"id":"3573788001234625","authorId":"3573788001234625","name":"Koalala","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e5b56f05d7e4c4896da404f0e1420ae1","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[Cry]&nbsp;","listText":"[Cry]&nbsp;","text":"[Cry]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9968527965","repostId":"2285458048","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":168,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9983781432,"gmtCreate":1666319504927,"gmtModify":1676537740654,"author":{"id":"3573788001234625","authorId":"3573788001234625","name":"Koalala","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e5b56f05d7e4c4896da404f0e1420ae1","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[Cry]&nbsp;","listText":"[Cry]&nbsp;","text":"[Cry]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9983781432","repostId":"1199718156","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1199718156","pubTimestamp":1666317015,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1199718156?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-10-21 09:50","market":"sg","language":"en","title":"5 Reliable Singapore REITs Delivering a Distribution Yield of 5.8% or More","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1199718156","media":"The Smart Investor","summary":"The REIT universe offers an impressive variety of REITs to suit almost any investor’s palate.But if ","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>The REIT universe offers an impressive variety of REITs to suit almost any investor’s palate.</p><p>But if you’re looking for REITs that offer reliability and certainty, it’s good to stick with recognisable names that come with a strong sponsor.</p><p>It also helps if the REIT has a great track record of paying out consistent distributions in the past.</p><p>With the recent sell-down in the REIT space, many attractive bargains have emerged.</p><p>Here are five reliable names that are offering a distribution yield exceeding 5.7%.</p><p><b>Mapletree Logistics Trust (SGX: M44U)</b></p><p>Mapletree Logistics Trust, or MLT, owns a portfolio of 185 properties spread out over eight countries with assets under management (AUM) of S$13 billion as of 30 June 2022.</p><p>The logistics REIT has done well and reported a strong set of numbers for its fiscal 2023’s first quarter (1Q2023).</p><p>Gross revenue rose 14.6% year on year to S$187.7 million while net property income (NPI) increased by 13.2% year on year to S$163.2 million.</p><p>Distribution per unit (DPU) was up by 5% year on year to S$0.02268.</p><p>MLT’s trailing 12-month DPU stood at S$0.08894, giving its units a trailing distribution yield of 6%.</p><p>The REIT also reported encouraging operating statistics, with a high occupancy rate of 96.8% as of 30 June 2022.</p><p>Average rental reversion for the quarter was positive 3.4% and the REIT had 80% of its debt hedged to fixed rates.</p><p><b>Frasers Logistics &amp; Commercial Trust (SGX: BUOU)</b></p><p>Frasers Logistics &amp; Commercial Trust, or FLCT, owns 105 properties with an AUM of S$6.5 billion spread out across the UK, Singapore, Australia, Germany, and the Netherlands.</p><p>The REIT announced a respectable set of earnings for its fiscal 2022’s first half (1H2022) ending 31 March 2022.</p><p>Revenue inched up 1.7% year on year to S$235.7 million while adjusted NPI rose 3.6% year on year to S$180.1 million.</p><p>DPU edged up 1.3% year on year to S$0.0385.</p><p>Coupled with 2H2021’s DPU of S$0.0388, FLCT’s trailing 12-month DPU came in at S$0.0773, giving its units a trailing distribution yield of 7%.</p><p>The REIT enjoys a low gearing of just 29.2% with 80.6% of its borrowings on fixed rates, thus mitigating against a sharp rise in borrowing costs arising from higher interest rates.</p><p><b>CapitaLand Ascendas REIT (SGX: A17U)</b></p><p>CapitaLand Ascendas REIT, or CLAS, is an industrial REIT that owns a portfolio of 227 properties in Singapore, the US, Australia, and the UK/Europe.</p><p>AUM stood at S$16.6 billion as of 30 June 2022.</p><p>For the REIT’s 1H2022, gross revenue increased 13.7% year on year to S$666.5 million with NPI rising by 7% year on year to S$476.9 million.</p><p>DPU inched up 2.8% year on year to S$0.07873.</p><p>CLAS’ 2H2021 DPU came in at S$0.07598, and the REIT’s trailing 12-month DPU stood at S$0.15471.</p><p>Its units offer a trailing 12-month distribution yield of 6%.</p><p>The REIT maintains a healthy balance sheet with gearing at 36.7% and has 80% of its debt on fixed rates.</p><p><b>CapitaLand Integrated Commercial Trust (SGX: C38U)</b></p><p>CapitaLand Integrated Commercial Trust, or CICT, is a retail and commercial REIT that owns 21 properties in Singapore, two in Germany, and three in Australia.</p><p>Total AUM stood at S$24.2 billion as of 31 December 2021.</p><p>For 1H2022, CICT saw its gross revenue rise 6.5% year on year to S$687.6 million with NPI improving by 6.2% year on year to S$501.6 million.</p><p>The REIT’s trailing 12-month DPU came in at S$0.1044, giving its units a trailing distribution yield of 5.8%.</p><p>CICT’s aggregate leverage stood at 40.6% as of 30 June 2022 with 81% of its borrowings on fixed rates. Its average cost of debt remained low at just 2.4%.</p><p><b>Keppel DC REIT (SGX: AJBU)</b></p><p>Keppel DC REIT owns a portfolio of 21 data centres across nine countries with an AUM of S$3.5 billion as of 30 June 2022.</p><p>The REIT reported a good set of earnings for 1H2022, with gross revenue inching up 0.3% year on year to S$135.5 million and distributable income jumping 8.2% year on year to S$91.1 million.</p><p>DPU crept up 2.5% year on year to S$0.05049.</p><p>For 2H2021, DPU came in at S$0.04927, giving Keppel DC REIT a trailing 12-month DPU of S$0.09976.</p><p>At a unit price of S$1.60, the trailing distribution yield stands at 6%.</p><p>The REIT had aggregate leverage of 35.3% as of 30 June with a low average cost of debt of 1.9%.</p><p>Around 76% of the REIT’s borrowings are in fixed rates.</p></body></html>","source":"lsy1602567310727","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>5 Reliable Singapore REITs Delivering a Distribution Yield of 5.8% or More</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n5 Reliable Singapore REITs Delivering a Distribution Yield of 5.8% or More\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-10-21 09:50 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://thesmartinvestor.com.sg/5-reliable-singapore-reits-delivering-a-distribution-yield-of-5-8-or-more/><strong>The Smart Investor</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The REIT universe offers an impressive variety of REITs to suit almost any investor’s palate.But if you’re looking for REITs that offer reliability and certainty, it’s good to stick with recognisable ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://thesmartinvestor.com.sg/5-reliable-singapore-reits-delivering-a-distribution-yield-of-5-8-or-more/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BUOU.SI":"星狮物流工业信托","A17U.SI":"凯德腾飞房产信托","C38U.SI":"凯德商用新加坡信托","M44U.SI":"丰树物流信托","AJBU.SI":"吉宝数据中心房地产信托"},"source_url":"https://thesmartinvestor.com.sg/5-reliable-singapore-reits-delivering-a-distribution-yield-of-5-8-or-more/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1199718156","content_text":"The REIT universe offers an impressive variety of REITs to suit almost any investor’s palate.But if you’re looking for REITs that offer reliability and certainty, it’s good to stick with recognisable names that come with a strong sponsor.It also helps if the REIT has a great track record of paying out consistent distributions in the past.With the recent sell-down in the REIT space, many attractive bargains have emerged.Here are five reliable names that are offering a distribution yield exceeding 5.7%.Mapletree Logistics Trust (SGX: M44U)Mapletree Logistics Trust, or MLT, owns a portfolio of 185 properties spread out over eight countries with assets under management (AUM) of S$13 billion as of 30 June 2022.The logistics REIT has done well and reported a strong set of numbers for its fiscal 2023’s first quarter (1Q2023).Gross revenue rose 14.6% year on year to S$187.7 million while net property income (NPI) increased by 13.2% year on year to S$163.2 million.Distribution per unit (DPU) was up by 5% year on year to S$0.02268.MLT’s trailing 12-month DPU stood at S$0.08894, giving its units a trailing distribution yield of 6%.The REIT also reported encouraging operating statistics, with a high occupancy rate of 96.8% as of 30 June 2022.Average rental reversion for the quarter was positive 3.4% and the REIT had 80% of its debt hedged to fixed rates.Frasers Logistics & Commercial Trust (SGX: BUOU)Frasers Logistics & Commercial Trust, or FLCT, owns 105 properties with an AUM of S$6.5 billion spread out across the UK, Singapore, Australia, Germany, and the Netherlands.The REIT announced a respectable set of earnings for its fiscal 2022’s first half (1H2022) ending 31 March 2022.Revenue inched up 1.7% year on year to S$235.7 million while adjusted NPI rose 3.6% year on year to S$180.1 million.DPU edged up 1.3% year on year to S$0.0385.Coupled with 2H2021’s DPU of S$0.0388, FLCT’s trailing 12-month DPU came in at S$0.0773, giving its units a trailing distribution yield of 7%.The REIT enjoys a low gearing of just 29.2% with 80.6% of its borrowings on fixed rates, thus mitigating against a sharp rise in borrowing costs arising from higher interest rates.CapitaLand Ascendas REIT (SGX: A17U)CapitaLand Ascendas REIT, or CLAS, is an industrial REIT that owns a portfolio of 227 properties in Singapore, the US, Australia, and the UK/Europe.AUM stood at S$16.6 billion as of 30 June 2022.For the REIT’s 1H2022, gross revenue increased 13.7% year on year to S$666.5 million with NPI rising by 7% year on year to S$476.9 million.DPU inched up 2.8% year on year to S$0.07873.CLAS’ 2H2021 DPU came in at S$0.07598, and the REIT’s trailing 12-month DPU stood at S$0.15471.Its units offer a trailing 12-month distribution yield of 6%.The REIT maintains a healthy balance sheet with gearing at 36.7% and has 80% of its debt on fixed rates.CapitaLand Integrated Commercial Trust (SGX: C38U)CapitaLand Integrated Commercial Trust, or CICT, is a retail and commercial REIT that owns 21 properties in Singapore, two in Germany, and three in Australia.Total AUM stood at S$24.2 billion as of 31 December 2021.For 1H2022, CICT saw its gross revenue rise 6.5% year on year to S$687.6 million with NPI improving by 6.2% year on year to S$501.6 million.The REIT’s trailing 12-month DPU came in at S$0.1044, giving its units a trailing distribution yield of 5.8%.CICT’s aggregate leverage stood at 40.6% as of 30 June 2022 with 81% of its borrowings on fixed rates. Its average cost of debt remained low at just 2.4%.Keppel DC REIT (SGX: AJBU)Keppel DC REIT owns a portfolio of 21 data centres across nine countries with an AUM of S$3.5 billion as of 30 June 2022.The REIT reported a good set of earnings for 1H2022, with gross revenue inching up 0.3% year on year to S$135.5 million and distributable income jumping 8.2% year on year to S$91.1 million.DPU crept up 2.5% year on year to S$0.05049.For 2H2021, DPU came in at S$0.04927, giving Keppel DC REIT a trailing 12-month DPU of S$0.09976.At a unit price of S$1.60, the trailing distribution yield stands at 6%.The REIT had aggregate leverage of 35.3% as of 30 June with a low average cost of debt of 1.9%.Around 76% of the REIT’s borrowings are in fixed rates.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":271,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":134421279,"gmtCreate":1622254735091,"gmtModify":1704182309765,"author":{"id":"3573788001234625","authorId":"3573788001234625","name":"Koalala","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e5b56f05d7e4c4896da404f0e1420ae1","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Wow","listText":"Wow","text":"Wow","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/134421279","repostId":"2138765488","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2138765488","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1622215232,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2138765488?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2021-05-28 23:20","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Tesla shares dip on recall rumors","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2138765488","media":"Reuters","summary":"May 28  - Shares of Tesla Inc fell more than 1% on Friday after an unverified tweet said the electric carmaker had decided to recall some of its Model Y and Model 3 vehicles, citing a note from the company.Tesla did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment and Reuters was unable to verify the statement from the company that was shown in the tweet.","content":"<p>May 28 (Reuters) - Shares of Tesla Inc&nbsp;fell more than 1% on Friday after an unverified tweet&nbsp;said the electric carmaker had decided to recall some of its Model Y and Model 3 vehicles, citing a note from the company.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ba675bb3c29017bd5165f1d31830b19e\" tg-width=\"794\" tg-height=\"614\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>Tesla did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment and Reuters was unable to verify the statement from the company that was shown in the tweet.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Tesla shares dip on recall rumors</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTesla shares dip on recall rumors\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-05-28 23:20</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>May 28 (Reuters) - Shares of Tesla Inc&nbsp;fell more than 1% on Friday after an unverified tweet&nbsp;said the electric carmaker had decided to recall some of its Model Y and Model 3 vehicles, citing a note from the company.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ba675bb3c29017bd5165f1d31830b19e\" tg-width=\"794\" tg-height=\"614\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>Tesla did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment and Reuters was unable to verify the statement from the company that was shown in the tweet.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2138765488","content_text":"May 28 (Reuters) - Shares of Tesla Inc fell more than 1% on Friday after an unverified tweet said the electric carmaker had decided to recall some of its Model Y and Model 3 vehicles, citing a note from the company.Tesla did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment and Reuters was unable to verify the statement from the company that was shown in the tweet.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":390,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}