+Follow
2021_NS
No personal profile
642
Follow
9
Followers
0
Topic
0
Badge
Posts
Hot
2021_NS
2021-01-29
！
Sorry, the original content has been removed
2021_NS
2021-01-29
！
An open letter from WSB retail investors: Melvin Capital and CNBC, listen up, this is a reason to target you.
2021_NS
2021-01-29
！
"Unplugging the internet cable" bullies retail investors, Wall Street witnesses its ugliest day in history.
Go to Tiger App to see more news
{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"userPageInfo":{"id":"3574242207425948","uuid":"3574242207425948","gmtCreate":1611148760123,"gmtModify":1611575045738,"name":"2021_NS","pinyin":"2021ns2021ns","introduction":"","introductionEn":null,"signature":"","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9064fe6900b6fd4f8c9c41bc4822f9d4","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":9,"headSize":642,"tweetSize":123,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":3,"name":"书生虎","nameTw":"書生虎","represent":"努力向上","factor":"发布10条非转发主帖,其中5条获得他人回复或点赞","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":"success","userBadges":[{"badgeId":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493-4","templateUuid":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493","name":"Tiger Star","description":"Join the tiger community for 2000 days","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/dddf24b906c7011de2617d4fb3f76987","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/53d58ad32c97254c6f74db8b97e6ec49","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6304700d92ad91c7a33e2e92ec32ecc1","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLinkType":null,"redirectLink":null,"redirectLinkValidityFrom":null,"redirectLinkValidityTo":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2026.07.14","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001,"isScarce":0,"effectEnabled":0,"plateImgUrl":null,"plateColors":null,"validityTo":null,"validityToTimestamp":null,"wearingSort":0},{"badgeId":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789-1","templateUuid":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789","name":"Knowledgeable Investor","description":"Traded more than 10 stocks","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e74cc24115c4fbae6154ec1b1041bf47","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d48265cbfd97c57f9048db29f22227b0","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76c6d6898b073c77e1c537ebe9ac1c57","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLinkType":null,"redirectLink":null,"redirectLinkValidityFrom":null,"redirectLinkValidityTo":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1102,"isScarce":0,"effectEnabled":0,"plateImgUrl":null,"plateColors":null,"validityTo":null,"validityToTimestamp":null,"wearingSort":0},{"badgeId":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84-1","templateUuid":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84","name":"Real Trader","description":"Completed a transaction","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLinkType":null,"redirectLink":null,"redirectLinkValidityFrom":null,"redirectLinkValidityTo":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100,"isScarce":0,"effectEnabled":0,"plateImgUrl":null,"plateColors":null,"validityTo":null,"validityToTimestamp":null,"wearingSort":0}],"userBadgeCount":3,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":null,"starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"post","tweets":[{"id":316342595,"gmtCreate":1611918812417,"gmtModify":1704865776128,"author":{"id":"3574242207425948","authorId":"3574242207425948","name":"2021_NS","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9064fe6900b6fd4f8c9c41bc4822f9d4","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3574242207425948","idStr":"3574242207425948"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"！","listText":"！","text":"！","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/316342595","repostId":"1122136764","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":4864,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":316340530,"gmtCreate":1611918299220,"gmtModify":1704865769655,"author":{"id":"3574242207425948","authorId":"3574242207425948","name":"2021_NS","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9064fe6900b6fd4f8c9c41bc4822f9d4","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3574242207425948","idStr":"3574242207425948"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"！","listText":"！","text":"！","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/316340530","repostId":"1189643321","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1189643321","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"为用户提供金融资讯、行情、数据，旨在帮助投资者理解世界，做投资决策。","home_visible":1,"media_name":"老虎资讯综合","id":"102","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1611880785,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1189643321?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-01-29 08:39","market":"us","language":"zh","title":"An open letter from WSB retail investors: Melvin Capital and CNBC, listen up, this is a reason to target you.","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1189643321","media":"老虎资讯综合","summary":"在美国散户抱团大战机构正酣之时，散户集中地wallstreetcbets论坛的一名用户发布一封公开信，写给被迫平仓游戏驿站空头头寸的对冲基金Melvin Capital、CNBC、二战结束后二十年内出生的婴儿潮一代以及所有WSB论坛用户。对于对冲基金Melvin Capital，我要说：你代表金融危机期间我仇恨的一切。","content":"<p>Source: Wall Street Insights</p><p>As the battle between retail investors in the United States is in full swing, a user on the wallstreetcbets (WSB) forum, a hub for retail investors, published an open letter to hedge fund Melvin Capital, CNBC, baby boomers born within the two decades after the end of World War II, and all WSB forum users who were forced to liquidate their short positions in GameStation.</p><p>In the letter, the retail investor criticized Wall Street institutions, represented by Melvin Capital, saying that they caused immense suffering to millions of ordinary people during the 2008 financial crisis, but were not punished at all. Instead, they were bailed out, and now they are openly and illegally shorting stocks like Game Station, without learning any lessons from the crisis. The retail investor accused mainstream media outlets like CNBC of accepting sponsorships from large corporations, speaking out for them, and demonizing retail investors' hype surrounding stocks like GameStation, calling such media outlets short-sighted profit-making activities.</p><p>This retail investor urged the baby boomer generation not to be misled by the media, hoping they would understand that the Wall Street institutions now under attack by retail investors were the culprits who caused their descendants to suffer during the financial crisis, and that retail investors are now seizing a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to punish these institutions. Finally, the retail investor thanked a WSB forum user who participated in buying Game Station stock, saying that they had achieved a rare act of robbing the rich to help the poor.</p><p>The full text of this open letter is as follows:</p><p>I was a teenager during the 2008 financial crisis. I clearly remember how much the unscrupulous actions of those people on Wall Street affected my personal life and the lives of those around me. I'm lucky, my parents are cautious and a little paranoid, and they stocked up on some food. When the crisis struck, our family saved our little house and survived on pancake flour, milk powder, beans, and rice for a year. Since then, my parents have been in the habit of storing food, and updating their inventory to ensure that they keep it fresh. But those relatives and friends around me are not so lucky. My aunt moved in with us and paid a little rent, and at that time she was desperately looking for any job she could do. Does anyone know what the tomato soup made from the ketchup packets in the school cafeteria tastes like? My friends were forced to try it. Nearly a year after the worst of the crisis, my father stabilized our family's income source and had time to help others through the difficulties. He hired my friend's father to do odd jobs and help with housework. One of them made a new closet for my living room, and another person tended to the flowers and plants in my yard. I will always be proud to have parents like this, because even when I suspect their family is tight on money, they notice those who need help most and warmly reach out. To the hedge fund Melvin Capital, I would say: You represent everything I hated during the financial crisis. You are a company that makes money by exploiting other companies and manipulating markets and the media. Your continued existence serves as a stark reminder that those responsible for the suffering caused by the 2008 crisis have not been punished for their actions back then. Your blatant disregard for the law, whether it was the blatant illegal short selling a few months ago (which you told your lawyer was a charge) or the recent shameless market manipulation, shows that you have not learned any lessons since 2008. Why are they targeting you? Because you Wall Street guys made terrible, illegal financial decisions that changed the lives of millions of people and had dire consequences, yet you were bailed out and rewarded. A few days ago I bought stock. I used my savings to buy Game Station (GME) stock, paid this month's rent with a credit card, and used the money I originally paid for rent to buy more GME stock (I don't recommend this to WSB users). I now hold these stocks. This is my personal decision, and the decision of millions of others. You can push GME's stock price down to $120 in a few hours, and I won't run away. You can pay for thousands of reddit bots, but I'm going to hold on. You can have all the mainstream media vilify us (retail investors) as demons and monsters, I don't care. I will do everything in my power to make you suffer. To CNBC, I would say: You have to realize that promoting an organization's agenda will only bring you short-term profits, only short-term profits. Your regular audience will quickly grow older, too old to care about you anymore, and millions of us—not just WSB subscribers, but all those affected by the 2008 crisis who are now following GME—will remember how you endorsed companies that destroyed many of us and attempted to bring down ordinary people. I'm sure I will remember. Here is a link to a list of CNBC's sponsors and partners. They include, but are not limited to, IBM, Cisco, T-Mobile, JPMorgan, Oracle, and ZipRecruiter. CNBC's parent company is NBCUniversal, which is controlled by Comcast and General Electric. For baby boomers and/or people close to that age, pay attention to these \"millennial blog posts\": you will realize that even if you were not negatively affected by the 2008 crash, your children and possibly even grandchildren are most likely victims. We are not your enemies, we are on the same side. Don't believe those media outlets who attack us just because they say we're destroying the market. We just have a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to punish the guys who caused so much pain and stress a decade ago, and we're seizing it. Your children and grandchildren may have suffered the hardships I have described because of the institutions we are rising up against. For the sake of your family and friends, do you really want to choose to support those people? We're not asking you to risk your 401K account or retirement fund to buy stock in GameStation. We are simply asking for your understanding and support, and not for those who caused such suffering ten years ago. To my friends on the WSB forum, I want to say: You are all great. I can guess that I am not the only one who takes personal action. I've read many people's posts about what you all went through during the 2008 crash. Whether you're doing it for profit, a persistent \"holdout\" like me, or simply participating in market fluctuations, I appreciate it. Each and every one of you is the reason we have this opportunity. I have never been so optimistic about the future before. What many of you have before you is a huge amount of money that can change your life. Redistributing wealth from the hands of the rich to the poor is a rare example, and participating in it is already an astonishing move. I love you all.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>An open letter from WSB retail investors: Melvin Capital and CNBC, listen up, this is a reason to target you.</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAn open letter from WSB retail investors: Melvin Capital and CNBC, listen up, this is a reason to target you.\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/102\">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">老虎资讯综合 </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-01-29 08:39</p>\n</div>\n</a>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Source: Wall Street Insights</p><p>As the battle between retail investors in the United States is in full swing, a user on the wallstreetcbets (WSB) forum, a hub for retail investors, published an open letter to hedge fund Melvin Capital, CNBC, baby boomers born within the two decades after the end of World War II, and all WSB forum users who were forced to liquidate their short positions in GameStation.</p><p>In the letter, the retail investor criticized Wall Street institutions, represented by Melvin Capital, saying that they caused immense suffering to millions of ordinary people during the 2008 financial crisis, but were not punished at all. Instead, they were bailed out, and now they are openly and illegally shorting stocks like Game Station, without learning any lessons from the crisis. The retail investor accused mainstream media outlets like CNBC of accepting sponsorships from large corporations, speaking out for them, and demonizing retail investors' hype surrounding stocks like GameStation, calling such media outlets short-sighted profit-making activities.</p><p>This retail investor urged the baby boomer generation not to be misled by the media, hoping they would understand that the Wall Street institutions now under attack by retail investors were the culprits who caused their descendants to suffer during the financial crisis, and that retail investors are now seizing a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to punish these institutions. Finally, the retail investor thanked a WSB forum user who participated in buying Game Station stock, saying that they had achieved a rare act of robbing the rich to help the poor.</p><p>The full text of this open letter is as follows:</p><p>I was a teenager during the 2008 financial crisis. I clearly remember how much the unscrupulous actions of those people on Wall Street affected my personal life and the lives of those around me. I'm lucky, my parents are cautious and a little paranoid, and they stocked up on some food. When the crisis struck, our family saved our little house and survived on pancake flour, milk powder, beans, and rice for a year. Since then, my parents have been in the habit of storing food, and updating their inventory to ensure that they keep it fresh. But those relatives and friends around me are not so lucky. My aunt moved in with us and paid a little rent, and at that time she was desperately looking for any job she could do. Does anyone know what the tomato soup made from the ketchup packets in the school cafeteria tastes like? My friends were forced to try it. Nearly a year after the worst of the crisis, my father stabilized our family's income source and had time to help others through the difficulties. He hired my friend's father to do odd jobs and help with housework. One of them made a new closet for my living room, and another person tended to the flowers and plants in my yard. I will always be proud to have parents like this, because even when I suspect their family is tight on money, they notice those who need help most and warmly reach out. To the hedge fund Melvin Capital, I would say: You represent everything I hated during the financial crisis. You are a company that makes money by exploiting other companies and manipulating markets and the media. Your continued existence serves as a stark reminder that those responsible for the suffering caused by the 2008 crisis have not been punished for their actions back then. Your blatant disregard for the law, whether it was the blatant illegal short selling a few months ago (which you told your lawyer was a charge) or the recent shameless market manipulation, shows that you have not learned any lessons since 2008. Why are they targeting you? Because you Wall Street guys made terrible, illegal financial decisions that changed the lives of millions of people and had dire consequences, yet you were bailed out and rewarded. A few days ago I bought stock. I used my savings to buy Game Station (GME) stock, paid this month's rent with a credit card, and used the money I originally paid for rent to buy more GME stock (I don't recommend this to WSB users). I now hold these stocks. This is my personal decision, and the decision of millions of others. You can push GME's stock price down to $120 in a few hours, and I won't run away. You can pay for thousands of reddit bots, but I'm going to hold on. You can have all the mainstream media vilify us (retail investors) as demons and monsters, I don't care. I will do everything in my power to make you suffer. To CNBC, I would say: You have to realize that promoting an organization's agenda will only bring you short-term profits, only short-term profits. Your regular audience will quickly grow older, too old to care about you anymore, and millions of us—not just WSB subscribers, but all those affected by the 2008 crisis who are now following GME—will remember how you endorsed companies that destroyed many of us and attempted to bring down ordinary people. I'm sure I will remember. Here is a link to a list of CNBC's sponsors and partners. They include, but are not limited to, IBM, Cisco, T-Mobile, JPMorgan, Oracle, and ZipRecruiter. CNBC's parent company is NBCUniversal, which is controlled by Comcast and General Electric. For baby boomers and/or people close to that age, pay attention to these \"millennial blog posts\": you will realize that even if you were not negatively affected by the 2008 crash, your children and possibly even grandchildren are most likely victims. We are not your enemies, we are on the same side. Don't believe those media outlets who attack us just because they say we're destroying the market. We just have a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to punish the guys who caused so much pain and stress a decade ago, and we're seizing it. Your children and grandchildren may have suffered the hardships I have described because of the institutions we are rising up against. For the sake of your family and friends, do you really want to choose to support those people? We're not asking you to risk your 401K account or retirement fund to buy stock in GameStation. We are simply asking for your understanding and support, and not for those who caused such suffering ten years ago. To my friends on the WSB forum, I want to say: You are all great. I can guess that I am not the only one who takes personal action. I've read many people's posts about what you all went through during the 2008 crash. Whether you're doing it for profit, a persistent \"holdout\" like me, or simply participating in market fluctuations, I appreciate it. Each and every one of you is the reason we have this opportunity. I have never been so optimistic about the future before. What many of you have before you is a huge amount of money that can change your life. Redistributing wealth from the hands of the rich to the poor is a rare example, and participating in it is already an astonishing move. I love you all.</p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1fd8a158b2676a493c439f246cd1bb0a","relate_stocks":{".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1189643321","content_text":"来源：华尔街见闻在美国散户抱团大战机构正酣之时，散户集中地wallstreetcbets（WSB）论坛的一名用户发布一封公开信，写给被迫平仓游戏驿站空头头寸的对冲基金Melvin Capital、CNBC、二战结束后二十年内出生的婴儿潮一代以及所有WSB论坛用户。信中，这名散户斥责以Melvin Capital为代表的华尔街机构，称他们在2008年的金融危机中给数以百万的普通民众制造了莫大的苦难，却没有受到任何惩罚，反而得到救助，如今又公然非法做空游戏驿站这样的个股，没有从危机中吸取丝毫教训。该散户指责CNBC这样的主流媒体收受大企业的赞助，为他们发声，将散户的热炒游戏驿站等个股妖魔化，称这类媒体吹捧机构是短视的牟利行为。这名散户呼吁婴儿潮一代老年人不要受媒体的蛊惑，希望他们理解，现在遭散户攻击的华尔街机构正是当年金融危机期间让他们的子孙受苦的元凶，散户现在就是在把握一生难得一次的机会惩罚这些机构。最后，该散户感谢一道参与买入游戏驿站股票的WSB论坛用户，称他们实现了少有的劫富济贫。这封公开信的全文如下：我十几岁的时候正赶上2008年金融危机。我清楚地记得，华尔街那帮人毫无顾忌的行动给我个人和我身边人的生活带来了多大的影响。我是幸运的，我父母为人谨慎，而且有点疑神疑鬼，他们存了些食物。危机来袭的时候，我们家保住了自己的小屋子，就靠松饼粉、奶粉、豆子和米饭过活，熬了一年。打那以后，我父母一直在有存食物的习惯，而且更新存货，保证存的是新鲜食品。但我周围的那些亲朋好友就没那么幸运了。我阿姨搬过来和我们住在一起，给我家付一点房租，那时候，她在外面拼命找一切能干的活。有人知道用学校食堂里的番茄酱料包做的那种番茄汤是什么味道吗？我的朋友们被迫尝过。危机最严重的时候过后将近一年，我父亲才稳定了我们一家的收入来源，来得及去帮别人渡过难关。他请了我朋友的父亲打零工，帮忙做家事。其中有个人给我家的客厅做了一个新的壁橱，还有个人给我家院子打理花草。我永远都为有这样的父母感到骄傲，因为即使是在我怀疑自家的钱还紧巴巴的时候，他们也能留意到那些最需要帮助的人，并且热情地伸出援手。对于对冲基金Melvin Capital，我要说：你代表金融危机期间我仇恨的一切。你是一家靠剥削别家公司和操纵市场以及媒体赚钱的公司。你的继续存在就等于在深刻提醒那些要为08年危机制造的苦难负责的人，他们没有因为当年的所作所为受到惩罚。你明目张胆地罔顾法律，不论是几个月前赤裸裸的非法卖空（告诉你的律师这是指控），还是最近无耻的市场操纵，都显示出，08年以来，你没有吸取任何教训。为什么会针对你？因为你们那些华尔街的家伙做了可怕的非法金融决策，改变了几百万人的生活，带来恶劣后果，却得到救助和奖赏。几天前我买了股票，我把积蓄掏出来买了游戏驿站（GME）的股票，用信用卡付了这个月的房租，把原本付房租的钱用来买了更多的GME股票（我不建议WSB的用户们这么做）。我现在持有这些股票。这是我个人的决定，也是其他几百万人的决定。你可以几小时内把GME的股价打压到120美元，我不会逃的。你可以花钱买几千个reddit论坛的机器人干扰，可我就是要持有。你可以让所有的主流媒体把我们（散户）丑化成妖魔鬼怪，我不在乎。我要尽一切能力让你痛苦。对CNBC，我要说：你必须意识到，给机构的计划日程做宣传只能让你短期获利，只是短期的。你的固定观众会很快越来越年老，年纪太老之后不会再管你怎样，而我们几百万人——不仅是WSB的用户，还包括所有受08年危机影响、并且现在关注着GME的人，都会记得你是怎样为那些摧毁我们很多人的公司代言，而且还企图打垮小人物。我确信，我会记得。这里有一个链接地址，整理了CNBC的赞助者和合作伙伴清单。他们包括但不限于IBM、思科、T-Mobile、摩根大通、甲骨文和ZipRecruiter。CNBC的母公司是NBCUniversal，而它是由Comcast和通用电气控股的。对婴儿潮一代和/或接近那个年纪的人，请注意这些“千禧一代人的博客文章”：你们会意识到，即使你没有受到08年崩盘的负面影响，你们的儿女以及可能还有孙辈最有可能都是受害者。我们不是你们的敌人，我们是同一个阵营。不要听信那些媒体说我们破坏市场就来攻击我们。我们只是拥有了一生中难得一次的机会，可以惩罚那帮十年前制造那么多苦痛和压力的家伙，我们在把握这个机会。你们的儿孙可能就因为我们在奋起反抗的那些机构而遭受过我所说的那些苦难。为了自己家人和朋友着想，你们真的想选择支持那帮人吗？我们并不是要求你们拿自己的401K养老金账户或者退休基金冒险，去买一只游戏驿站的股票。我们只是请你们理解，表示支持，不要支援那些十年前造成如此苦难的人。对WSB论坛的朋友，我要说：你们大家都很棒。我能猜想到，我不是唯一一个采取个人行动的人。我读过很多人的帖子，讲述了你们都在08年崩盘中经历了什么。无论你是为了牟利，还是像我这样坚持的“钉子户”，或者只是可能随着市场波动的潮流参与其中，我都表示感谢。你们每一个人都是我们拥有这个机会的原因。我以前从未这样对未来感到乐观。摆在你们很多人面前的是能改变人生的庞大资金。将富人手中的财富重新分配给穷人，这是一个罕见的实例，参与其中就已经是惊人之举。我爱你们大家。","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".IXIC":0.9,".DJI":0.9,".SPX":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":5116,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":316003756,"gmtCreate":1611897875575,"gmtModify":1704865409695,"author":{"id":"3574242207425948","authorId":"3574242207425948","name":"2021_NS","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9064fe6900b6fd4f8c9c41bc4822f9d4","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3574242207425948","idStr":"3574242207425948"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"！","listText":"！","text":"！","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/316003756","repostId":"2107429437","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2107429437","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1611885824,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2107429437?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-01-29 10:03","market":"us","language":"zh","title":"\"Unplugging the internet cable\" bullies retail investors, Wall Street witnesses its ugliest day in history.","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2107429437","media":"海通国际","summary":"今天是华尔街丑陋的一天。Gamestop引发的散户暴动肯定会收场，但是我干算万算，万万想不到会以今天的方式收场：以 Robinhood为首的所有电子交易平台，在上年10点几乎同时限制散户买入GME，A","content":"<p>Today is an ugly day for Wall Street.</p><p>The retail investor riots triggered by Gamestop will definitely end, but I never imagined it would end the way it did today: all electronic trading platforms, led by Robinhood, almost simultaneously restricted retail investors from buying stocks such as GME and AMC at 10 a.m. last year. In an instant, GME's stock price plummeted from nearly $500 to $110, as shown in the chart below.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/68ba09b996878b13a7be28686db3dd26\" tg-width=\"840\" tg-height=\"470\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><b>Ugly point one:</b>Retail investors are deprived of the right to buy and sell their existing positions, but Wall Street institutions can still short, close, buy, sell, and so on without any restrictions. It's like two boxers going up in the ring to fight, and when one side is about to lose, the referee suddenly rushes out and ties the hands of the one who is about to win, saying, \"Boxing is a dangerous sport, so for your own good, I'll tie your hands.\"</p><p><b>The second ugly point:</b>Robinhood, which restricts retail investors from buying and selling, has close ties with Wall Street hedge funds. First, Robinhood's investor D (who manages $20 billion and invested $200 million in Robinhood) also suffered a huge loss of 20% this month. The Wall Street Journal did not give a reason for the huge losses, only that D's huge losses were caused by the recent market turmoil. But aside from a few stocks being skyrocketed by retail investors, has there been any other chaos in the market recently? Secondly, Robinhood and other electronic brokerages will send retail investors' trading orders to C in exchange for cash. In other words, C is the backer who continuously provides cash to Robinhood and other electronic brokerages. In this short squeeze, C was also the financial backer supporting M. I don't know if Robinhood received any hints from its two sponsors, C and D, to close retail buying transactions. I can't make a judgment; I'm just presenting some facts.</p><p><b>The third ugly point:</b>Wall Street's short sellers, before retail investors restricted their trading and bought trades, didn't forget to take advantage of retail investors (which I think is the ugliest thing). Let's look at the image below.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b3950da7bdffcd19e360e577df249142\" tg-width=\"550\" tg-height=\"365\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>The red section shows the stock price change after electronic brokerages collectively restricted retail investors' purchases, causing the price to instantly drop from $483 to $112. I believe that during that hour or so, retail investors were desperate and fled, and the stock price experienced multiple pauses. However, after reaching a low of $112, the stock price rose all the way to more than $300 (green line). Note: Retail investors no longer have the ability to buy at this point; only institutional investors can buy. Could it be that institutions are optimistic about this stock and believe that a stock priced over $100 has value? Of course not, institutions are just liquidating their empty positions. In other words, throughout the battle between bulls and bears, institutions never stopped building their empty positions; they were simply beaten to the punch by retail investors, who kept cutting losses and opening new empty positions. Finally, while retail investors were fleeing, they managed to cut off $450 of their retail investors, averaging $225 to close the position, resulting in a 50% return. I didn't know that before the institutions finally opened short positions, they knew in advance that electronic securities firms were going to target retail investors. Similarly, I do not make inferences of guilt; I simply present the facts.</p><p>This ugly scene on Wall Street far surpasses that of the 2008 financial crisis, when sellers asked the government for a rescue plan and then handed out huge bonuses to executives. Public opinion, at least among retail investors, was extremely angry, and the Senate immediately announced it would hold a hearing. I specifically looked up all the policies introduced during the 2015 Chinese stock market crash. The most radical one was to restrict companies from selling their own shares, but none of them were aimed at retail investors. If a policy had been introduced in 2015 prohibiting retail investors from selling stocks, or if securities firms had directly banned retail investors, allowing them to only buy and not sell, what kind of criticism would it have drawn? Do you think that if the Senate holds a hearing, public opinion or justice will be served? You're overthinking it. Senate hearings are always about rubbing wounds on the people, telling them that we have heard your grievances and that we will further monitor them in the future. If action were to be taken, the United States should immediately announce an investigation into the motives behind electronic brokerages banning retail investors from making purchases, as well as who had built empty positions before the sharp drop. This wouldn't be difficult at all, but no one would do it.</p><p>I don't think it makes sense for retail investors to send a company on the verge of bankruptcy skyrocketing. But the methods used to end this farce were truly ugly.</p>","source":"lsy1594264741347","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>\"Unplugging the internet cable\" bullies retail investors, Wall Street witnesses its ugliest day in history.</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n\"Unplugging the internet cable\" bullies retail investors, Wall Street witnesses its ugliest day in history.\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">海通国际</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-01-29 10:03</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Today is an ugly day for Wall Street.</p><p>The retail investor riots triggered by Gamestop will definitely end, but I never imagined it would end the way it did today: all electronic trading platforms, led by Robinhood, almost simultaneously restricted retail investors from buying stocks such as GME and AMC at 10 a.m. last year. In an instant, GME's stock price plummeted from nearly $500 to $110, as shown in the chart below.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/68ba09b996878b13a7be28686db3dd26\" tg-width=\"840\" tg-height=\"470\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><b>Ugly point one:</b>Retail investors are deprived of the right to buy and sell their existing positions, but Wall Street institutions can still short, close, buy, sell, and so on without any restrictions. It's like two boxers going up in the ring to fight, and when one side is about to lose, the referee suddenly rushes out and ties the hands of the one who is about to win, saying, \"Boxing is a dangerous sport, so for your own good, I'll tie your hands.\"</p><p><b>The second ugly point:</b>Robinhood, which restricts retail investors from buying and selling, has close ties with Wall Street hedge funds. First, Robinhood's investor D (who manages $20 billion and invested $200 million in Robinhood) also suffered a huge loss of 20% this month. The Wall Street Journal did not give a reason for the huge losses, only that D's huge losses were caused by the recent market turmoil. But aside from a few stocks being skyrocketed by retail investors, has there been any other chaos in the market recently? Secondly, Robinhood and other electronic brokerages will send retail investors' trading orders to C in exchange for cash. In other words, C is the backer who continuously provides cash to Robinhood and other electronic brokerages. In this short squeeze, C was also the financial backer supporting M. I don't know if Robinhood received any hints from its two sponsors, C and D, to close retail buying transactions. I can't make a judgment; I'm just presenting some facts.</p><p><b>The third ugly point:</b>Wall Street's short sellers, before retail investors restricted their trading and bought trades, didn't forget to take advantage of retail investors (which I think is the ugliest thing). Let's look at the image below.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b3950da7bdffcd19e360e577df249142\" tg-width=\"550\" tg-height=\"365\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>The red section shows the stock price change after electronic brokerages collectively restricted retail investors' purchases, causing the price to instantly drop from $483 to $112. I believe that during that hour or so, retail investors were desperate and fled, and the stock price experienced multiple pauses. However, after reaching a low of $112, the stock price rose all the way to more than $300 (green line). Note: Retail investors no longer have the ability to buy at this point; only institutional investors can buy. Could it be that institutions are optimistic about this stock and believe that a stock priced over $100 has value? Of course not, institutions are just liquidating their empty positions. In other words, throughout the battle between bulls and bears, institutions never stopped building their empty positions; they were simply beaten to the punch by retail investors, who kept cutting losses and opening new empty positions. Finally, while retail investors were fleeing, they managed to cut off $450 of their retail investors, averaging $225 to close the position, resulting in a 50% return. I didn't know that before the institutions finally opened short positions, they knew in advance that electronic securities firms were going to target retail investors. Similarly, I do not make inferences of guilt; I simply present the facts.</p><p>This ugly scene on Wall Street far surpasses that of the 2008 financial crisis, when sellers asked the government for a rescue plan and then handed out huge bonuses to executives. Public opinion, at least among retail investors, was extremely angry, and the Senate immediately announced it would hold a hearing. I specifically looked up all the policies introduced during the 2015 Chinese stock market crash. The most radical one was to restrict companies from selling their own shares, but none of them were aimed at retail investors. If a policy had been introduced in 2015 prohibiting retail investors from selling stocks, or if securities firms had directly banned retail investors, allowing them to only buy and not sell, what kind of criticism would it have drawn? Do you think that if the Senate holds a hearing, public opinion or justice will be served? You're overthinking it. Senate hearings are always about rubbing wounds on the people, telling them that we have heard your grievances and that we will further monitor them in the future. If action were to be taken, the United States should immediately announce an investigation into the motives behind electronic brokerages banning retail investors from making purchases, as well as who had built empty positions before the sharp drop. This wouldn't be difficult at all, but no one would do it.</p><p>I don't think it makes sense for retail investors to send a company on the verge of bankruptcy skyrocketing. But the methods used to end this farce were truly ugly.</p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> source：<a href=\"https://finance.sina.com.cn/stock/usstock/c/2021-01-29/doc-ikftssap1640500.shtml\">海通国际</a></p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/50f0a252f951b7accc03d40bda92a3b2","relate_stocks":{"GME":"游戏驿站","AMC":"AMC院线"},"source_url":"https://finance.sina.com.cn/stock/usstock/c/2021-01-29/doc-ikftssap1640500.shtml","is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2107429437","content_text":"今天是华尔街丑陋的一天。Gamestop引发的散户暴动肯定会收场，但是我干算万算，万万想不到会以今天的方式收场：以 Robinhood为首的所有电子交易平台，在上年10点几乎同时限制散户买入GME，AMC等股票。一瞬间，GME股价从近$500开始断崖式下跌至$110，先看下图。丑陋点一：散户被剥夺了（买入）交易的权利，只能卖出已有的仓位，但华尔街机构却依然可以做空、平仓、买入、卖出等等，没有任何限制。这就好比两个拳击选手上台比赛，当一方快要输的时候，裁判突然冲了出来，把即将取胜一方的双手捆上，理由是“拳击是危险运动，为了你好，我把你的双手捆上”。丑陋点二：限制散户进行买入交易的 Robinhood，和华尔街对冲基金们有着千丝万缕的联系。首先， Robinhood后面的投资人D（管理$200亿，向 Robinhood投资了$2亿），本月也是巨亏20%。华尔街日报并没有说巨亏的原因，只是说D的巨亏是由于最近市场混乱造成的。但最近除了几个股票被散户拱到天上以外，市场还有什么混乱吗？其次， Robinhood和其它电子券商，会把散户的交易单发给C，換取现金。也就是说，C是源源不断给Robinhood和其它电子券商提供现金的金主。在这次逼空事件中，C又是站在后面支持M的金主。我不知道向Robinhood关闭散户买入交易有没有得到两位金主C和D的暗示，我没法做判断，我只是把一些事实摆出来。丑陋点三：华尔街的空头们，在散户限制交易买入交易之前，最后还不忘割散户非菜一把（这是我认为最丑陋的一点）。我们看下图。红色的那一段，就是电子券商集体限制散户买入之后的股价变化，价格瞬间从$483跌到了$112。我相信这一个多小时的时间，散户们是绝望的，夺门而逃，股价经历了多次暂停。但是股价在到达低点$112之后，却一路上扬到$300多（绿色线段）。注意：散户们这时候已经没有买入的能力了，能买的只有机构。难道是机构在看好这个股票，觉得$100多的股票有价值？当然不是，机构只是在平他们的空仓而已。也就是说，在一路多空大战中，机构们根本就没有停止过建他们的空仓，只是一路被散户打得落花流水，不停止损开新的空仓。最后趁着散户们逃跑的时候，终于割了韭菜$450空仓，平均$225平仓，收益50%。我不知道机构最后开空仓之前，事先知道了电子券商要对散户下手。同样，我不做有罪推断，我只是摆事实。华尔街这丑陋一幕，远远胜过2008年金融危机卖方找政府要了救援计划，转手给高管发巨额奖金。民意，至少是散户的民意，异常愤怒，参议院立刻表示要召开听证会。我专门去查了一下2015年中国股灾出台的所有政策，最激进的就是限制公司出售自己的股票，但没有一条是针对散户的。要是2015年出台政策说散户们不准卖股票，或者直接让券商封了散户，只能买不能卖，那会招来什么样的口诛笔伐？是不是觉得参议院召开听证会，民意或者正义就会得到伸张了？想多了，参议院的听证会向来就是给民众揉揉伤口，告诉民众你们的冤屈我们听到了，我们以后会进一步监管。真要有动作，美国应该马上宣布调查电子券商封禁散户买单的动机，以及大跌之前都有谁建了空仓，其实一点不难，但不会有人去做。我不觉得散户们把一个濒临破产的公司炒到天上，就有道理。但终结这场闹剧的手段，真的是丑陋。","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"GME":0.9,"AMC":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":5103,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":316340530,"gmtCreate":1611918299220,"gmtModify":1704865769655,"author":{"id":"3574242207425948","authorId":"3574242207425948","name":"2021_NS","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9064fe6900b6fd4f8c9c41bc4822f9d4","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574242207425948","authorIdStr":"3574242207425948"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"！","listText":"！","text":"！","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/316340530","repostId":"1189643321","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1189643321","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"为用户提供金融资讯、行情、数据，旨在帮助投资者理解世界，做投资决策。","home_visible":1,"media_name":"老虎资讯综合","id":"102","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1611880785,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1189643321?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-01-29 08:39","market":"us","language":"zh","title":"An open letter from WSB retail investors: Melvin Capital and CNBC, listen up, this is a reason to target you.","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1189643321","media":"老虎资讯综合","summary":"在美国散户抱团大战机构正酣之时，散户集中地wallstreetcbets论坛的一名用户发布一封公开信，写给被迫平仓游戏驿站空头头寸的对冲基金Melvin Capital、CNBC、二战结束后二十年内出生的婴儿潮一代以及所有WSB论坛用户。对于对冲基金Melvin Capital，我要说：你代表金融危机期间我仇恨的一切。","content":"<p>Source: Wall Street Insights</p><p>As the battle between retail investors in the United States is in full swing, a user on the wallstreetcbets (WSB) forum, a hub for retail investors, published an open letter to hedge fund Melvin Capital, CNBC, baby boomers born within the two decades after the end of World War II, and all WSB forum users who were forced to liquidate their short positions in GameStation.</p><p>In the letter, the retail investor criticized Wall Street institutions, represented by Melvin Capital, saying that they caused immense suffering to millions of ordinary people during the 2008 financial crisis, but were not punished at all. Instead, they were bailed out, and now they are openly and illegally shorting stocks like Game Station, without learning any lessons from the crisis. The retail investor accused mainstream media outlets like CNBC of accepting sponsorships from large corporations, speaking out for them, and demonizing retail investors' hype surrounding stocks like GameStation, calling such media outlets short-sighted profit-making activities.</p><p>This retail investor urged the baby boomer generation not to be misled by the media, hoping they would understand that the Wall Street institutions now under attack by retail investors were the culprits who caused their descendants to suffer during the financial crisis, and that retail investors are now seizing a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to punish these institutions. Finally, the retail investor thanked a WSB forum user who participated in buying Game Station stock, saying that they had achieved a rare act of robbing the rich to help the poor.</p><p>The full text of this open letter is as follows:</p><p>I was a teenager during the 2008 financial crisis. I clearly remember how much the unscrupulous actions of those people on Wall Street affected my personal life and the lives of those around me. I'm lucky, my parents are cautious and a little paranoid, and they stocked up on some food. When the crisis struck, our family saved our little house and survived on pancake flour, milk powder, beans, and rice for a year. Since then, my parents have been in the habit of storing food, and updating their inventory to ensure that they keep it fresh. But those relatives and friends around me are not so lucky. My aunt moved in with us and paid a little rent, and at that time she was desperately looking for any job she could do. Does anyone know what the tomato soup made from the ketchup packets in the school cafeteria tastes like? My friends were forced to try it. Nearly a year after the worst of the crisis, my father stabilized our family's income source and had time to help others through the difficulties. He hired my friend's father to do odd jobs and help with housework. One of them made a new closet for my living room, and another person tended to the flowers and plants in my yard. I will always be proud to have parents like this, because even when I suspect their family is tight on money, they notice those who need help most and warmly reach out. To the hedge fund Melvin Capital, I would say: You represent everything I hated during the financial crisis. You are a company that makes money by exploiting other companies and manipulating markets and the media. Your continued existence serves as a stark reminder that those responsible for the suffering caused by the 2008 crisis have not been punished for their actions back then. Your blatant disregard for the law, whether it was the blatant illegal short selling a few months ago (which you told your lawyer was a charge) or the recent shameless market manipulation, shows that you have not learned any lessons since 2008. Why are they targeting you? Because you Wall Street guys made terrible, illegal financial decisions that changed the lives of millions of people and had dire consequences, yet you were bailed out and rewarded. A few days ago I bought stock. I used my savings to buy Game Station (GME) stock, paid this month's rent with a credit card, and used the money I originally paid for rent to buy more GME stock (I don't recommend this to WSB users). I now hold these stocks. This is my personal decision, and the decision of millions of others. You can push GME's stock price down to $120 in a few hours, and I won't run away. You can pay for thousands of reddit bots, but I'm going to hold on. You can have all the mainstream media vilify us (retail investors) as demons and monsters, I don't care. I will do everything in my power to make you suffer. To CNBC, I would say: You have to realize that promoting an organization's agenda will only bring you short-term profits, only short-term profits. Your regular audience will quickly grow older, too old to care about you anymore, and millions of us—not just WSB subscribers, but all those affected by the 2008 crisis who are now following GME—will remember how you endorsed companies that destroyed many of us and attempted to bring down ordinary people. I'm sure I will remember. Here is a link to a list of CNBC's sponsors and partners. They include, but are not limited to, IBM, Cisco, T-Mobile, JPMorgan, Oracle, and ZipRecruiter. CNBC's parent company is NBCUniversal, which is controlled by Comcast and General Electric. For baby boomers and/or people close to that age, pay attention to these \"millennial blog posts\": you will realize that even if you were not negatively affected by the 2008 crash, your children and possibly even grandchildren are most likely victims. We are not your enemies, we are on the same side. Don't believe those media outlets who attack us just because they say we're destroying the market. We just have a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to punish the guys who caused so much pain and stress a decade ago, and we're seizing it. Your children and grandchildren may have suffered the hardships I have described because of the institutions we are rising up against. For the sake of your family and friends, do you really want to choose to support those people? We're not asking you to risk your 401K account or retirement fund to buy stock in GameStation. We are simply asking for your understanding and support, and not for those who caused such suffering ten years ago. To my friends on the WSB forum, I want to say: You are all great. I can guess that I am not the only one who takes personal action. I've read many people's posts about what you all went through during the 2008 crash. Whether you're doing it for profit, a persistent \"holdout\" like me, or simply participating in market fluctuations, I appreciate it. Each and every one of you is the reason we have this opportunity. I have never been so optimistic about the future before. What many of you have before you is a huge amount of money that can change your life. Redistributing wealth from the hands of the rich to the poor is a rare example, and participating in it is already an astonishing move. I love you all.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>An open letter from WSB retail investors: Melvin Capital and CNBC, listen up, this is a reason to target you.</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAn open letter from WSB retail investors: Melvin Capital and CNBC, listen up, this is a reason to target you.\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/102\">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">老虎资讯综合 </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-01-29 08:39</p>\n</div>\n</a>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Source: Wall Street Insights</p><p>As the battle between retail investors in the United States is in full swing, a user on the wallstreetcbets (WSB) forum, a hub for retail investors, published an open letter to hedge fund Melvin Capital, CNBC, baby boomers born within the two decades after the end of World War II, and all WSB forum users who were forced to liquidate their short positions in GameStation.</p><p>In the letter, the retail investor criticized Wall Street institutions, represented by Melvin Capital, saying that they caused immense suffering to millions of ordinary people during the 2008 financial crisis, but were not punished at all. Instead, they were bailed out, and now they are openly and illegally shorting stocks like Game Station, without learning any lessons from the crisis. The retail investor accused mainstream media outlets like CNBC of accepting sponsorships from large corporations, speaking out for them, and demonizing retail investors' hype surrounding stocks like GameStation, calling such media outlets short-sighted profit-making activities.</p><p>This retail investor urged the baby boomer generation not to be misled by the media, hoping they would understand that the Wall Street institutions now under attack by retail investors were the culprits who caused their descendants to suffer during the financial crisis, and that retail investors are now seizing a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to punish these institutions. Finally, the retail investor thanked a WSB forum user who participated in buying Game Station stock, saying that they had achieved a rare act of robbing the rich to help the poor.</p><p>The full text of this open letter is as follows:</p><p>I was a teenager during the 2008 financial crisis. I clearly remember how much the unscrupulous actions of those people on Wall Street affected my personal life and the lives of those around me. I'm lucky, my parents are cautious and a little paranoid, and they stocked up on some food. When the crisis struck, our family saved our little house and survived on pancake flour, milk powder, beans, and rice for a year. Since then, my parents have been in the habit of storing food, and updating their inventory to ensure that they keep it fresh. But those relatives and friends around me are not so lucky. My aunt moved in with us and paid a little rent, and at that time she was desperately looking for any job she could do. Does anyone know what the tomato soup made from the ketchup packets in the school cafeteria tastes like? My friends were forced to try it. Nearly a year after the worst of the crisis, my father stabilized our family's income source and had time to help others through the difficulties. He hired my friend's father to do odd jobs and help with housework. One of them made a new closet for my living room, and another person tended to the flowers and plants in my yard. I will always be proud to have parents like this, because even when I suspect their family is tight on money, they notice those who need help most and warmly reach out. To the hedge fund Melvin Capital, I would say: You represent everything I hated during the financial crisis. You are a company that makes money by exploiting other companies and manipulating markets and the media. Your continued existence serves as a stark reminder that those responsible for the suffering caused by the 2008 crisis have not been punished for their actions back then. Your blatant disregard for the law, whether it was the blatant illegal short selling a few months ago (which you told your lawyer was a charge) or the recent shameless market manipulation, shows that you have not learned any lessons since 2008. Why are they targeting you? Because you Wall Street guys made terrible, illegal financial decisions that changed the lives of millions of people and had dire consequences, yet you were bailed out and rewarded. A few days ago I bought stock. I used my savings to buy Game Station (GME) stock, paid this month's rent with a credit card, and used the money I originally paid for rent to buy more GME stock (I don't recommend this to WSB users). I now hold these stocks. This is my personal decision, and the decision of millions of others. You can push GME's stock price down to $120 in a few hours, and I won't run away. You can pay for thousands of reddit bots, but I'm going to hold on. You can have all the mainstream media vilify us (retail investors) as demons and monsters, I don't care. I will do everything in my power to make you suffer. To CNBC, I would say: You have to realize that promoting an organization's agenda will only bring you short-term profits, only short-term profits. Your regular audience will quickly grow older, too old to care about you anymore, and millions of us—not just WSB subscribers, but all those affected by the 2008 crisis who are now following GME—will remember how you endorsed companies that destroyed many of us and attempted to bring down ordinary people. I'm sure I will remember. Here is a link to a list of CNBC's sponsors and partners. They include, but are not limited to, IBM, Cisco, T-Mobile, JPMorgan, Oracle, and ZipRecruiter. CNBC's parent company is NBCUniversal, which is controlled by Comcast and General Electric. For baby boomers and/or people close to that age, pay attention to these \"millennial blog posts\": you will realize that even if you were not negatively affected by the 2008 crash, your children and possibly even grandchildren are most likely victims. We are not your enemies, we are on the same side. Don't believe those media outlets who attack us just because they say we're destroying the market. We just have a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to punish the guys who caused so much pain and stress a decade ago, and we're seizing it. Your children and grandchildren may have suffered the hardships I have described because of the institutions we are rising up against. For the sake of your family and friends, do you really want to choose to support those people? We're not asking you to risk your 401K account or retirement fund to buy stock in GameStation. We are simply asking for your understanding and support, and not for those who caused such suffering ten years ago. To my friends on the WSB forum, I want to say: You are all great. I can guess that I am not the only one who takes personal action. I've read many people's posts about what you all went through during the 2008 crash. Whether you're doing it for profit, a persistent \"holdout\" like me, or simply participating in market fluctuations, I appreciate it. Each and every one of you is the reason we have this opportunity. I have never been so optimistic about the future before. What many of you have before you is a huge amount of money that can change your life. Redistributing wealth from the hands of the rich to the poor is a rare example, and participating in it is already an astonishing move. I love you all.</p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1fd8a158b2676a493c439f246cd1bb0a","relate_stocks":{".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1189643321","content_text":"来源：华尔街见闻在美国散户抱团大战机构正酣之时，散户集中地wallstreetcbets（WSB）论坛的一名用户发布一封公开信，写给被迫平仓游戏驿站空头头寸的对冲基金Melvin Capital、CNBC、二战结束后二十年内出生的婴儿潮一代以及所有WSB论坛用户。信中，这名散户斥责以Melvin Capital为代表的华尔街机构，称他们在2008年的金融危机中给数以百万的普通民众制造了莫大的苦难，却没有受到任何惩罚，反而得到救助，如今又公然非法做空游戏驿站这样的个股，没有从危机中吸取丝毫教训。该散户指责CNBC这样的主流媒体收受大企业的赞助，为他们发声，将散户的热炒游戏驿站等个股妖魔化，称这类媒体吹捧机构是短视的牟利行为。这名散户呼吁婴儿潮一代老年人不要受媒体的蛊惑，希望他们理解，现在遭散户攻击的华尔街机构正是当年金融危机期间让他们的子孙受苦的元凶，散户现在就是在把握一生难得一次的机会惩罚这些机构。最后，该散户感谢一道参与买入游戏驿站股票的WSB论坛用户，称他们实现了少有的劫富济贫。这封公开信的全文如下：我十几岁的时候正赶上2008年金融危机。我清楚地记得，华尔街那帮人毫无顾忌的行动给我个人和我身边人的生活带来了多大的影响。我是幸运的，我父母为人谨慎，而且有点疑神疑鬼，他们存了些食物。危机来袭的时候，我们家保住了自己的小屋子，就靠松饼粉、奶粉、豆子和米饭过活，熬了一年。打那以后，我父母一直在有存食物的习惯，而且更新存货，保证存的是新鲜食品。但我周围的那些亲朋好友就没那么幸运了。我阿姨搬过来和我们住在一起，给我家付一点房租，那时候，她在外面拼命找一切能干的活。有人知道用学校食堂里的番茄酱料包做的那种番茄汤是什么味道吗？我的朋友们被迫尝过。危机最严重的时候过后将近一年，我父亲才稳定了我们一家的收入来源，来得及去帮别人渡过难关。他请了我朋友的父亲打零工，帮忙做家事。其中有个人给我家的客厅做了一个新的壁橱，还有个人给我家院子打理花草。我永远都为有这样的父母感到骄傲，因为即使是在我怀疑自家的钱还紧巴巴的时候，他们也能留意到那些最需要帮助的人，并且热情地伸出援手。对于对冲基金Melvin Capital，我要说：你代表金融危机期间我仇恨的一切。你是一家靠剥削别家公司和操纵市场以及媒体赚钱的公司。你的继续存在就等于在深刻提醒那些要为08年危机制造的苦难负责的人，他们没有因为当年的所作所为受到惩罚。你明目张胆地罔顾法律，不论是几个月前赤裸裸的非法卖空（告诉你的律师这是指控），还是最近无耻的市场操纵，都显示出，08年以来，你没有吸取任何教训。为什么会针对你？因为你们那些华尔街的家伙做了可怕的非法金融决策，改变了几百万人的生活，带来恶劣后果，却得到救助和奖赏。几天前我买了股票，我把积蓄掏出来买了游戏驿站（GME）的股票，用信用卡付了这个月的房租，把原本付房租的钱用来买了更多的GME股票（我不建议WSB的用户们这么做）。我现在持有这些股票。这是我个人的决定，也是其他几百万人的决定。你可以几小时内把GME的股价打压到120美元，我不会逃的。你可以花钱买几千个reddit论坛的机器人干扰，可我就是要持有。你可以让所有的主流媒体把我们（散户）丑化成妖魔鬼怪，我不在乎。我要尽一切能力让你痛苦。对CNBC，我要说：你必须意识到，给机构的计划日程做宣传只能让你短期获利，只是短期的。你的固定观众会很快越来越年老，年纪太老之后不会再管你怎样，而我们几百万人——不仅是WSB的用户，还包括所有受08年危机影响、并且现在关注着GME的人，都会记得你是怎样为那些摧毁我们很多人的公司代言，而且还企图打垮小人物。我确信，我会记得。这里有一个链接地址，整理了CNBC的赞助者和合作伙伴清单。他们包括但不限于IBM、思科、T-Mobile、摩根大通、甲骨文和ZipRecruiter。CNBC的母公司是NBCUniversal，而它是由Comcast和通用电气控股的。对婴儿潮一代和/或接近那个年纪的人，请注意这些“千禧一代人的博客文章”：你们会意识到，即使你没有受到08年崩盘的负面影响，你们的儿女以及可能还有孙辈最有可能都是受害者。我们不是你们的敌人，我们是同一个阵营。不要听信那些媒体说我们破坏市场就来攻击我们。我们只是拥有了一生中难得一次的机会，可以惩罚那帮十年前制造那么多苦痛和压力的家伙，我们在把握这个机会。你们的儿孙可能就因为我们在奋起反抗的那些机构而遭受过我所说的那些苦难。为了自己家人和朋友着想，你们真的想选择支持那帮人吗？我们并不是要求你们拿自己的401K养老金账户或者退休基金冒险，去买一只游戏驿站的股票。我们只是请你们理解，表示支持，不要支援那些十年前造成如此苦难的人。对WSB论坛的朋友，我要说：你们大家都很棒。我能猜想到，我不是唯一一个采取个人行动的人。我读过很多人的帖子，讲述了你们都在08年崩盘中经历了什么。无论你是为了牟利，还是像我这样坚持的“钉子户”，或者只是可能随着市场波动的潮流参与其中，我都表示感谢。你们每一个人都是我们拥有这个机会的原因。我以前从未这样对未来感到乐观。摆在你们很多人面前的是能改变人生的庞大资金。将富人手中的财富重新分配给穷人，这是一个罕见的实例，参与其中就已经是惊人之举。我爱你们大家。","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".IXIC":0.9,".DJI":0.9,".SPX":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":5116,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":316342595,"gmtCreate":1611918812417,"gmtModify":1704865776128,"author":{"id":"3574242207425948","authorId":"3574242207425948","name":"2021_NS","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9064fe6900b6fd4f8c9c41bc4822f9d4","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574242207425948","authorIdStr":"3574242207425948"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"！","listText":"！","text":"！","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/316342595","repostId":"1122136764","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":4864,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":316003756,"gmtCreate":1611897875575,"gmtModify":1704865409695,"author":{"id":"3574242207425948","authorId":"3574242207425948","name":"2021_NS","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9064fe6900b6fd4f8c9c41bc4822f9d4","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574242207425948","authorIdStr":"3574242207425948"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"！","listText":"！","text":"！","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/316003756","repostId":"2107429437","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2107429437","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1611885824,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2107429437?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-01-29 10:03","market":"us","language":"zh","title":"\"Unplugging the internet cable\" bullies retail investors, Wall Street witnesses its ugliest day in history.","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2107429437","media":"海通国际","summary":"今天是华尔街丑陋的一天。Gamestop引发的散户暴动肯定会收场，但是我干算万算，万万想不到会以今天的方式收场：以 Robinhood为首的所有电子交易平台，在上年10点几乎同时限制散户买入GME，A","content":"<p>Today is an ugly day for Wall Street.</p><p>The retail investor riots triggered by Gamestop will definitely end, but I never imagined it would end the way it did today: all electronic trading platforms, led by Robinhood, almost simultaneously restricted retail investors from buying stocks such as GME and AMC at 10 a.m. last year. In an instant, GME's stock price plummeted from nearly $500 to $110, as shown in the chart below.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/68ba09b996878b13a7be28686db3dd26\" tg-width=\"840\" tg-height=\"470\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><b>Ugly point one:</b>Retail investors are deprived of the right to buy and sell their existing positions, but Wall Street institutions can still short, close, buy, sell, and so on without any restrictions. It's like two boxers going up in the ring to fight, and when one side is about to lose, the referee suddenly rushes out and ties the hands of the one who is about to win, saying, \"Boxing is a dangerous sport, so for your own good, I'll tie your hands.\"</p><p><b>The second ugly point:</b>Robinhood, which restricts retail investors from buying and selling, has close ties with Wall Street hedge funds. First, Robinhood's investor D (who manages $20 billion and invested $200 million in Robinhood) also suffered a huge loss of 20% this month. The Wall Street Journal did not give a reason for the huge losses, only that D's huge losses were caused by the recent market turmoil. But aside from a few stocks being skyrocketed by retail investors, has there been any other chaos in the market recently? Secondly, Robinhood and other electronic brokerages will send retail investors' trading orders to C in exchange for cash. In other words, C is the backer who continuously provides cash to Robinhood and other electronic brokerages. In this short squeeze, C was also the financial backer supporting M. I don't know if Robinhood received any hints from its two sponsors, C and D, to close retail buying transactions. I can't make a judgment; I'm just presenting some facts.</p><p><b>The third ugly point:</b>Wall Street's short sellers, before retail investors restricted their trading and bought trades, didn't forget to take advantage of retail investors (which I think is the ugliest thing). Let's look at the image below.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b3950da7bdffcd19e360e577df249142\" tg-width=\"550\" tg-height=\"365\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>The red section shows the stock price change after electronic brokerages collectively restricted retail investors' purchases, causing the price to instantly drop from $483 to $112. I believe that during that hour or so, retail investors were desperate and fled, and the stock price experienced multiple pauses. However, after reaching a low of $112, the stock price rose all the way to more than $300 (green line). Note: Retail investors no longer have the ability to buy at this point; only institutional investors can buy. Could it be that institutions are optimistic about this stock and believe that a stock priced over $100 has value? Of course not, institutions are just liquidating their empty positions. In other words, throughout the battle between bulls and bears, institutions never stopped building their empty positions; they were simply beaten to the punch by retail investors, who kept cutting losses and opening new empty positions. Finally, while retail investors were fleeing, they managed to cut off $450 of their retail investors, averaging $225 to close the position, resulting in a 50% return. I didn't know that before the institutions finally opened short positions, they knew in advance that electronic securities firms were going to target retail investors. Similarly, I do not make inferences of guilt; I simply present the facts.</p><p>This ugly scene on Wall Street far surpasses that of the 2008 financial crisis, when sellers asked the government for a rescue plan and then handed out huge bonuses to executives. Public opinion, at least among retail investors, was extremely angry, and the Senate immediately announced it would hold a hearing. I specifically looked up all the policies introduced during the 2015 Chinese stock market crash. The most radical one was to restrict companies from selling their own shares, but none of them were aimed at retail investors. If a policy had been introduced in 2015 prohibiting retail investors from selling stocks, or if securities firms had directly banned retail investors, allowing them to only buy and not sell, what kind of criticism would it have drawn? Do you think that if the Senate holds a hearing, public opinion or justice will be served? You're overthinking it. Senate hearings are always about rubbing wounds on the people, telling them that we have heard your grievances and that we will further monitor them in the future. If action were to be taken, the United States should immediately announce an investigation into the motives behind electronic brokerages banning retail investors from making purchases, as well as who had built empty positions before the sharp drop. This wouldn't be difficult at all, but no one would do it.</p><p>I don't think it makes sense for retail investors to send a company on the verge of bankruptcy skyrocketing. But the methods used to end this farce were truly ugly.</p>","source":"lsy1594264741347","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>\"Unplugging the internet cable\" bullies retail investors, Wall Street witnesses its ugliest day in history.</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n\"Unplugging the internet cable\" bullies retail investors, Wall Street witnesses its ugliest day in history.\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">海通国际</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-01-29 10:03</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Today is an ugly day for Wall Street.</p><p>The retail investor riots triggered by Gamestop will definitely end, but I never imagined it would end the way it did today: all electronic trading platforms, led by Robinhood, almost simultaneously restricted retail investors from buying stocks such as GME and AMC at 10 a.m. last year. In an instant, GME's stock price plummeted from nearly $500 to $110, as shown in the chart below.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/68ba09b996878b13a7be28686db3dd26\" tg-width=\"840\" tg-height=\"470\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><b>Ugly point one:</b>Retail investors are deprived of the right to buy and sell their existing positions, but Wall Street institutions can still short, close, buy, sell, and so on without any restrictions. It's like two boxers going up in the ring to fight, and when one side is about to lose, the referee suddenly rushes out and ties the hands of the one who is about to win, saying, \"Boxing is a dangerous sport, so for your own good, I'll tie your hands.\"</p><p><b>The second ugly point:</b>Robinhood, which restricts retail investors from buying and selling, has close ties with Wall Street hedge funds. First, Robinhood's investor D (who manages $20 billion and invested $200 million in Robinhood) also suffered a huge loss of 20% this month. The Wall Street Journal did not give a reason for the huge losses, only that D's huge losses were caused by the recent market turmoil. But aside from a few stocks being skyrocketed by retail investors, has there been any other chaos in the market recently? Secondly, Robinhood and other electronic brokerages will send retail investors' trading orders to C in exchange for cash. In other words, C is the backer who continuously provides cash to Robinhood and other electronic brokerages. In this short squeeze, C was also the financial backer supporting M. I don't know if Robinhood received any hints from its two sponsors, C and D, to close retail buying transactions. I can't make a judgment; I'm just presenting some facts.</p><p><b>The third ugly point:</b>Wall Street's short sellers, before retail investors restricted their trading and bought trades, didn't forget to take advantage of retail investors (which I think is the ugliest thing). Let's look at the image below.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b3950da7bdffcd19e360e577df249142\" tg-width=\"550\" tg-height=\"365\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>The red section shows the stock price change after electronic brokerages collectively restricted retail investors' purchases, causing the price to instantly drop from $483 to $112. I believe that during that hour or so, retail investors were desperate and fled, and the stock price experienced multiple pauses. However, after reaching a low of $112, the stock price rose all the way to more than $300 (green line). Note: Retail investors no longer have the ability to buy at this point; only institutional investors can buy. Could it be that institutions are optimistic about this stock and believe that a stock priced over $100 has value? Of course not, institutions are just liquidating their empty positions. In other words, throughout the battle between bulls and bears, institutions never stopped building their empty positions; they were simply beaten to the punch by retail investors, who kept cutting losses and opening new empty positions. Finally, while retail investors were fleeing, they managed to cut off $450 of their retail investors, averaging $225 to close the position, resulting in a 50% return. I didn't know that before the institutions finally opened short positions, they knew in advance that electronic securities firms were going to target retail investors. Similarly, I do not make inferences of guilt; I simply present the facts.</p><p>This ugly scene on Wall Street far surpasses that of the 2008 financial crisis, when sellers asked the government for a rescue plan and then handed out huge bonuses to executives. Public opinion, at least among retail investors, was extremely angry, and the Senate immediately announced it would hold a hearing. I specifically looked up all the policies introduced during the 2015 Chinese stock market crash. The most radical one was to restrict companies from selling their own shares, but none of them were aimed at retail investors. If a policy had been introduced in 2015 prohibiting retail investors from selling stocks, or if securities firms had directly banned retail investors, allowing them to only buy and not sell, what kind of criticism would it have drawn? Do you think that if the Senate holds a hearing, public opinion or justice will be served? You're overthinking it. Senate hearings are always about rubbing wounds on the people, telling them that we have heard your grievances and that we will further monitor them in the future. If action were to be taken, the United States should immediately announce an investigation into the motives behind electronic brokerages banning retail investors from making purchases, as well as who had built empty positions before the sharp drop. This wouldn't be difficult at all, but no one would do it.</p><p>I don't think it makes sense for retail investors to send a company on the verge of bankruptcy skyrocketing. But the methods used to end this farce were truly ugly.</p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> source：<a href=\"https://finance.sina.com.cn/stock/usstock/c/2021-01-29/doc-ikftssap1640500.shtml\">海通国际</a></p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/50f0a252f951b7accc03d40bda92a3b2","relate_stocks":{"GME":"游戏驿站","AMC":"AMC院线"},"source_url":"https://finance.sina.com.cn/stock/usstock/c/2021-01-29/doc-ikftssap1640500.shtml","is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2107429437","content_text":"今天是华尔街丑陋的一天。Gamestop引发的散户暴动肯定会收场，但是我干算万算，万万想不到会以今天的方式收场：以 Robinhood为首的所有电子交易平台，在上年10点几乎同时限制散户买入GME，AMC等股票。一瞬间，GME股价从近$500开始断崖式下跌至$110，先看下图。丑陋点一：散户被剥夺了（买入）交易的权利，只能卖出已有的仓位，但华尔街机构却依然可以做空、平仓、买入、卖出等等，没有任何限制。这就好比两个拳击选手上台比赛，当一方快要输的时候，裁判突然冲了出来，把即将取胜一方的双手捆上，理由是“拳击是危险运动，为了你好，我把你的双手捆上”。丑陋点二：限制散户进行买入交易的 Robinhood，和华尔街对冲基金们有着千丝万缕的联系。首先， Robinhood后面的投资人D（管理$200亿，向 Robinhood投资了$2亿），本月也是巨亏20%。华尔街日报并没有说巨亏的原因，只是说D的巨亏是由于最近市场混乱造成的。但最近除了几个股票被散户拱到天上以外，市场还有什么混乱吗？其次， Robinhood和其它电子券商，会把散户的交易单发给C，換取现金。也就是说，C是源源不断给Robinhood和其它电子券商提供现金的金主。在这次逼空事件中，C又是站在后面支持M的金主。我不知道向Robinhood关闭散户买入交易有没有得到两位金主C和D的暗示，我没法做判断，我只是把一些事实摆出来。丑陋点三：华尔街的空头们，在散户限制交易买入交易之前，最后还不忘割散户非菜一把（这是我认为最丑陋的一点）。我们看下图。红色的那一段，就是电子券商集体限制散户买入之后的股价变化，价格瞬间从$483跌到了$112。我相信这一个多小时的时间，散户们是绝望的，夺门而逃，股价经历了多次暂停。但是股价在到达低点$112之后，却一路上扬到$300多（绿色线段）。注意：散户们这时候已经没有买入的能力了，能买的只有机构。难道是机构在看好这个股票，觉得$100多的股票有价值？当然不是，机构只是在平他们的空仓而已。也就是说，在一路多空大战中，机构们根本就没有停止过建他们的空仓，只是一路被散户打得落花流水，不停止损开新的空仓。最后趁着散户们逃跑的时候，终于割了韭菜$450空仓，平均$225平仓，收益50%。我不知道机构最后开空仓之前，事先知道了电子券商要对散户下手。同样，我不做有罪推断，我只是摆事实。华尔街这丑陋一幕，远远胜过2008年金融危机卖方找政府要了救援计划，转手给高管发巨额奖金。民意，至少是散户的民意，异常愤怒，参议院立刻表示要召开听证会。我专门去查了一下2015年中国股灾出台的所有政策，最激进的就是限制公司出售自己的股票，但没有一条是针对散户的。要是2015年出台政策说散户们不准卖股票，或者直接让券商封了散户，只能买不能卖，那会招来什么样的口诛笔伐？是不是觉得参议院召开听证会，民意或者正义就会得到伸张了？想多了，参议院的听证会向来就是给民众揉揉伤口，告诉民众你们的冤屈我们听到了，我们以后会进一步监管。真要有动作，美国应该马上宣布调查电子券商封禁散户买单的动机，以及大跌之前都有谁建了空仓，其实一点不难，但不会有人去做。我不觉得散户们把一个濒临破产的公司炒到天上，就有道理。但终结这场闹剧的手段，真的是丑陋。","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"GME":0.9,"AMC":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":5103,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}
