Joanteo personal page - To The Moon

Joanteo

No personal profile

51Follow

1Followers

0Topic

0Badge

2021-07-24

Ok

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2021-07-19

Good

Wall Street Crime And Punishment: Thomas F. Quinn's Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World

2021-07-29

Wow

Why AMD's Stock Is Trading Higher Today

2021-07-27

Ok

Tesla sales surge 98%; company boosts margins on its less-costly electric cars

2021-07-16

Good

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2021-08-01

Ok

Antitrust Activists Want to Go Full Throttle. Here’s a Lesson They Should Consider First

2021-07-29

Ok

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2021-07-21

Ok

Stocks That Hit 52-Week Lows On Tuesday

2021-07-19

Good

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2021-07-30

Ok

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2021-07-27

Ok

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2021-07-27

Wow

American Airlines warns pilots of fuel shortages, cites logistical issues

2021-07-27

Wow

Apple Earnings Face High Expectations

2021-07-27

Good

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2021-07-26

Ok

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2021-07-21

Ok

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2021-07-10

Enter both

Taiwan Semiconductor Vs. United Microelectronics Stock: Which Is The Better Buy?

2021-07-26

Ok

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2021-07-24

Good

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2021-07-19

Great

Pfizer is making the case for COVID-19 booster shots. Fauci say we don't need a third dose yet. Who's right?

Go to Tiger App to see more news

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"userPageInfo":{"id":"3574834972684297","uuid":"3574834972684297","gmtCreate":1614844021313,"gmtModify":1614844021313,"name":"Joanteo","pinyin":"joanteo","introduction":"","introductionEn":null,"signature":"","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":1,"headSize":51,"tweetSize":27,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":1,"name":"萌萌虎","nameTw":"萌萌虎","represent":"呱呱坠地","factor":"评论帖子3次或发布1条主帖（非转发）","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":"success","userBadges":[{"badgeId":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493-3","templateUuid":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493","name":" Tiger Idol","description":"Join the tiger community for 1500 days","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8b40ae7da5bf081a1c84df14bf9e6367","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f160eceddd7c284a8e1136557615cfad","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/11792805c468334a9b31c39f95a41c6a","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2025.04.13","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789-1","templateUuid":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789","name":"Knowledgeable Investor","description":"Traded more than 10 stocks","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e74cc24115c4fbae6154ec1b1041bf47","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d48265cbfd97c57f9048db29f22227b0","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76c6d6898b073c77e1c537ebe9ac1c57","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2025.01.02","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1102},{"badgeId":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84-1","templateUuid":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84","name":"Real Trader","description":"Completed a transaction","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":3,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":null,"starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":1,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"hot","tweets":[{"id":209560368390232,"gmtCreate":1692202145226,"gmtModify":1692202146763,"author":{"id":"3574834972684297","authorId":"3574834972684297","name":"Joanteo","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3574834972684297","idStr":"3574834972684297"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Great ariticle, would you like to share it?","listText":"Great ariticle, would you like to share it?","text":"Great ariticle, would you like to share it?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/209560368390232","repostId":"209254663278712","repostType":1,"repost":{"id":209254663278712,"gmtCreate":1692105369063,"gmtModify":1692105412959,"author":{"id":"4102740236684050","authorId":"4102740236684050","name":"MaverickWealthBuilder","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/bbf0f514b8e5abb92266789b89f6e1e6","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4102740236684050","idStr":"4102740236684050"},"themes":[],"title":"What Makes Sea The Most Disappointing Growth Stock?","htmlText":"Why did Sea collapse again? Who applied the pressure? Is there still hope for valuation? <a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/SE\">$Sea Ltd(SE)$</a> ‘s Q2 2023 earning made the stock plummeted 10% in pre-market trading. Despite the profit indicators slightly exceeding market expectations, the main gaming and e-commerce revenue fell short, and there was no guidance for the next quarter, leading investors to doubt its business growth capabilities and the potential for profit margin improvement. We believeThe company deliberately signaled \"profit margin indicators\" to the market. However, profit margin is merely a new expectation in the market, a promise for the company to improve the \"burn money for scale\" model in the era of high inflation, without giving up the expectation of \"high growth\" for","listText":"Why did Sea collapse again? Who applied the pressure? Is there still hope for valuation? <a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/SE\">$Sea Ltd(SE)$</a> ‘s Q2 2023 earning made the stock plummeted 10% in pre-market trading. Despite the profit indicators slightly exceeding market expectations, the main gaming and e-commerce revenue fell short, and there was no guidance for the next quarter, leading investors to doubt its business growth capabilities and the potential for profit margin improvement. We believeThe company deliberately signaled \"profit margin indicators\" to the market. However, profit margin is merely a new expectation in the market, a promise for the company to improve the \"burn money for scale\" model in the era of high inflation, without giving up the expectation of \"high growth\" for","text":"Why did Sea collapse again? Who applied the pressure? Is there still hope for valuation? $Sea Ltd(SE)$ ‘s Q2 2023 earning made the stock plummeted 10% in pre-market trading. Despite the profit indicators slightly exceeding market expectations, the main gaming and e-commerce revenue fell short, and there was no guidance for the next quarter, leading investors to doubt its business growth capabilities and the potential for profit margin improvement. We believeThe company deliberately signaled \"profit margin indicators\" to the market. However, profit margin is merely a new expectation in the market, a promise for the company to improve the \"burn money for scale\" model in the era of high inflation, without giving up the expectation of \"high growth\" for","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7683539e2a9f0ce24c4592ef50884997","width":"1775","height":"734"},{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1c7fd753a0c7c1542a646ca6f0bbc836","width":"750","height":"450"},{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7a12774b1dd280823e8dcf3b850be55c","width":"750","height":"450"}],"top":1,"highlighted":2,"essential":2,"paper":2,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/209254663278712","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":0,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":12,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2229,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":209560338182232,"gmtCreate":1692202137851,"gmtModify":1692202141456,"author":{"id":"3574834972684297","authorId":"3574834972684297","name":"Joanteo","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3574834972684297","idStr":"3574834972684297"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Great ariticle, would you like to share it?","listText":"Great ariticle, would you like to share it?","text":"Great ariticle, would you like to share it?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/209560338182232","repostId":"209271904149624","repostType":1,"repost":{"id":209271904149624,"gmtCreate":1692109578260,"gmtModify":1692109747096,"author":{"id":"3527667645834579","authorId":"3527667645834579","name":"OptionsBB","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/f1e0deba0895fb30eee2a3aaec61cd42","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3527667645834579","idStr":"3527667645834579"},"themes":[],"title":"Options Spy: When Nvidia rose, Intel's OTM put options were unusually high","htmlText":"Nvidia surged more than 7 percent and technology stocks surged, leading U.S. stocks to break out of a two-week slump. However, Tesla cut prices and electric vehicles were generally weak. AMC shares plunged 35% after a preferred stock conversion plan was approved.As earnings season comes to a close, the focus turns to retail earnings this week, including Home Depot on Tuesday, Target on Wednesday and Walmart on Thursday.Minutes from the Federal Reserve meeting to be released on Wednesday will also be closely watched as investors look for more clues on the outlook for monetary policy and see whether most officials are sounding hawk or dove. Goldman expects the Fed to hold off on raising rates at its regular September meeting and then announce in November that inflation is slowing, meaning fu","listText":"Nvidia surged more than 7 percent and technology stocks surged, leading U.S. stocks to break out of a two-week slump. However, Tesla cut prices and electric vehicles were generally weak. AMC shares plunged 35% after a preferred stock conversion plan was approved.As earnings season comes to a close, the focus turns to retail earnings this week, including Home Depot on Tuesday, Target on Wednesday and Walmart on Thursday.Minutes from the Federal Reserve meeting to be released on Wednesday will also be closely watched as investors look for more clues on the outlook for monetary policy and see whether most officials are sounding hawk or dove. Goldman expects the Fed to hold off on raising rates at its regular September meeting and then announce in November that inflation is slowing, meaning fu","text":"Nvidia surged more than 7 percent and technology stocks surged, leading U.S. stocks to break out of a two-week slump. However, Tesla cut prices and electric vehicles were generally weak. AMC shares plunged 35% after a preferred stock conversion plan was approved.As earnings season comes to a close, the focus turns to retail earnings this week, including Home Depot on Tuesday, Target on Wednesday and Walmart on Thursday.Minutes from the Federal Reserve meeting to be released on Wednesday will also be closely watched as investors look for more clues on the outlook for monetary policy and see whether most officials are sounding hawk or dove. Goldman expects the Fed to hold off on raising rates at its regular September meeting and then announce in November that inflation is slowing, meaning fu","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/95e3bcc97387e553802c4f4ac8a0428b","width":"2486","height":"474"},{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7aa0c9fc54dabf583844424d3de41cba","width":"2302","height":"1300"},{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3edb950a48577b2b7aa361279d1ea357","width":"2308","height":"1294"}],"top":1,"highlighted":2,"essential":2,"paper":2,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/209271904149624","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":0,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":7,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2205,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":209560758833320,"gmtCreate":1692202130430,"gmtModify":1692202133613,"author":{"id":"3574834972684297","authorId":"3574834972684297","name":"Joanteo","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3574834972684297","idStr":"3574834972684297"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Great ariticle, would you like to share it?","listText":"Great ariticle, would you like to share it?","text":"Great ariticle, would you like to share it?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/209560758833320","repostId":"209199405383816","repostType":1,"repost":{"id":209199405383816,"gmtCreate":1692111073360,"gmtModify":1692113017622,"author":{"id":"3572212908677301","authorId":"3572212908677301","name":"TigerOptions","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/20925853481806adc78dcdfe25f2fe89","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3572212908677301","idStr":"3572212908677301"},"themes":[],"title":"Trade Recap 15 August","htmlText":"Not a good start for the market today with the <a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/QQQ\">$Invesco QQQ Trust-ETF(QQQ)$</a><v-v data-views=\"0\"></v-v> and <a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/SPY\">$SPDR S&amp;P 500 ETF Trust(SPY)$</a><v-v data-views=\"0\"></v-v> flushing down from the market open.[Duh]&nbsp; With both indexes weakening, I decided to trade <a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/TSLA\">$Tesla Motors(TSLA)$</a><v-v data-views=\"0\"></v-v> which recently has bearish news. Source: TradingView Trade 1 🟢 TSLA 237.5 PUT I bought in <a href=\"https://ttm.financial/OPT/TSLA%2020230825%20237.5%20PUT\">$TSLA 20230825 237.5 PUT$</a>(1st green arrow) when I saw the price falling below the 1 min opening range. Sold half at around 10%+ profit and was waiting for a bigger move down. It did go lower but I only sol","listText":"Not a good start for the market today with the <a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/QQQ\">$Invesco QQQ Trust-ETF(QQQ)$</a><v-v data-views=\"0\"></v-v> and <a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/SPY\">$SPDR S&amp;P 500 ETF Trust(SPY)$</a><v-v data-views=\"0\"></v-v> flushing down from the market open.[Duh]&nbsp; With both indexes weakening, I decided to trade <a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/TSLA\">$Tesla Motors(TSLA)$</a><v-v data-views=\"0\"></v-v> which recently has bearish news. Source: TradingView Trade 1 🟢 TSLA 237.5 PUT I bought in <a href=\"https://ttm.financial/OPT/TSLA%2020230825%20237.5%20PUT\">$TSLA 20230825 237.5 PUT$</a>(1st green arrow) when I saw the price falling below the 1 min opening range. Sold half at around 10%+ profit and was waiting for a bigger move down. It did go lower but I only sol","text":"Not a good start for the market today with the $Invesco QQQ Trust-ETF(QQQ)$ and $SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust(SPY)$ flushing down from the market open.[Duh] With both indexes weakening, I decided to trade $Tesla Motors(TSLA)$ which recently has bearish news. Source: TradingView Trade 1 🟢 TSLA 237.5 PUT I bought in $TSLA 20230825 237.5 PUT$(1st green arrow) when I saw the price falling below the 1 min opening range. Sold half at around 10%+ profit and was waiting for a bigger move down. It did go lower but I only sol","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/c9b2e1c15e7e26d68d8468262628c144","width":"604","height":"604"},{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/890bc82a87dfab5074ab2958a0c377a6","width":"1274","height":"749"},{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/a875078a085309563c59039e93585fb7","width":"398","height":"604"}],"top":1,"highlighted":2,"essential":2,"paper":2,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/209199405383816","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":0,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":7,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2418,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":209560605765800,"gmtCreate":1692202093061,"gmtModify":1692202095366,"author":{"id":"3574834972684297","authorId":"3574834972684297","name":"Joanteo","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3574834972684297","idStr":"3574834972684297"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Great ariticle, would you like to share it?","listText":"Great ariticle, would you like to share it?","text":"Great ariticle, would you like to share it?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/209560605765800","repostId":"209591040249872","repostType":1,"repost":{"id":209591040249872,"gmtCreate":1692187594693,"gmtModify":1692187614788,"author":{"id":"3527667618821228","authorId":"3527667618821228","name":"MillionaireTiger","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/dc558bf32e48ad6ed6d057026ef55af7","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3527667618821228","idStr":"3527667618821228"},"themes":[],"title":"VinFast debuts with 254% gains! Will Vietnamese EV maker continue to impress market?","htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/VFS\">$VinFast Auto(VFS)$</a> , a Vietnamese electric vehicle (EV) maker, recently made its debut on the Nasdaq stock exchange through a $23 billion backdoor listing facilitated by a special purpose acquisition company (SPAC) called <a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/BSAQ.U\">$Black Spade Acquisition Co.(BSAQ.U)$</a> . Vietnamese EV Maker VinFast Debuts on the Nasdaq, and Shares SoarVinFast's stock opened at $22 per share, which was more than double the $10 per share agreed upon with its SPAC partner. The stock price surged during the trading session, closing at $37.06. This increase in stock price valued the company at $85 billion, surpassing the market capitalizations of established automakers like <a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/F\">$Ford(F)$</a> and","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/VFS\">$VinFast Auto(VFS)$</a> , a Vietnamese electric vehicle (EV) maker, recently made its debut on the Nasdaq stock exchange through a $23 billion backdoor listing facilitated by a special purpose acquisition company (SPAC) called <a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/BSAQ.U\">$Black Spade Acquisition Co.(BSAQ.U)$</a> . Vietnamese EV Maker VinFast Debuts on the Nasdaq, and Shares SoarVinFast's stock opened at $22 per share, which was more than double the $10 per share agreed upon with its SPAC partner. The stock price surged during the trading session, closing at $37.06. This increase in stock price valued the company at $85 billion, surpassing the market capitalizations of established automakers like <a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/F\">$Ford(F)$</a> and","text":"$VinFast Auto(VFS)$ , a Vietnamese electric vehicle (EV) maker, recently made its debut on the Nasdaq stock exchange through a $23 billion backdoor listing facilitated by a special purpose acquisition company (SPAC) called $Black Spade Acquisition Co.(BSAQ.U)$ . Vietnamese EV Maker VinFast Debuts on the Nasdaq, and Shares SoarVinFast's stock opened at $22 per share, which was more than double the $10 per share agreed upon with its SPAC partner. The stock price surged during the trading session, closing at $37.06. This increase in stock price valued the company at $85 billion, surpassing the market capitalizations of established automakers like $Ford(F)$ and","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/e8f2b9884fb60b92926562cc065e5a9c","width":"1500","height":"1001"},{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/f03a48bde1fee5784d4d86f8c8cb4157","width":"560","height":"240"},{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/973bede1c4301acc2a1d1323c0d97412","width":"2000","height":"1334"}],"top":1,"highlighted":2,"essential":2,"paper":2,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/209591040249872","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":0,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"subType":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":3,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2338,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":209560551338016,"gmtCreate":1692202064036,"gmtModify":1692202067360,"author":{"id":"3574834972684297","authorId":"3574834972684297","name":"Joanteo","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3574834972684297","idStr":"3574834972684297"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Great ariticle, would you like to share it?","listText":"Great ariticle, would you like to share it?","text":"Great ariticle, would you like to share it?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/209560551338016","repostId":"209591040249872","repostType":1,"repost":{"id":209591040249872,"gmtCreate":1692187594693,"gmtModify":1692187614788,"author":{"id":"3527667618821228","authorId":"3527667618821228","name":"MillionaireTiger","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/dc558bf32e48ad6ed6d057026ef55af7","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3527667618821228","idStr":"3527667618821228"},"themes":[],"title":"VinFast debuts with 254% gains! Will Vietnamese EV maker continue to impress market?","htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/VFS\">$VinFast Auto(VFS)$</a> , a Vietnamese electric vehicle (EV) maker, recently made its debut on the Nasdaq stock exchange through a $23 billion backdoor listing facilitated by a special purpose acquisition company (SPAC) called <a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/BSAQ.U\">$Black Spade Acquisition Co.(BSAQ.U)$</a> . Vietnamese EV Maker VinFast Debuts on the Nasdaq, and Shares SoarVinFast's stock opened at $22 per share, which was more than double the $10 per share agreed upon with its SPAC partner. The stock price surged during the trading session, closing at $37.06. This increase in stock price valued the company at $85 billion, surpassing the market capitalizations of established automakers like <a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/F\">$Ford(F)$</a> and","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/VFS\">$VinFast Auto(VFS)$</a> , a Vietnamese electric vehicle (EV) maker, recently made its debut on the Nasdaq stock exchange through a $23 billion backdoor listing facilitated by a special purpose acquisition company (SPAC) called <a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/BSAQ.U\">$Black Spade Acquisition Co.(BSAQ.U)$</a> . Vietnamese EV Maker VinFast Debuts on the Nasdaq, and Shares SoarVinFast's stock opened at $22 per share, which was more than double the $10 per share agreed upon with its SPAC partner. The stock price surged during the trading session, closing at $37.06. This increase in stock price valued the company at $85 billion, surpassing the market capitalizations of established automakers like <a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/F\">$Ford(F)$</a> and","text":"$VinFast Auto(VFS)$ , a Vietnamese electric vehicle (EV) maker, recently made its debut on the Nasdaq stock exchange through a $23 billion backdoor listing facilitated by a special purpose acquisition company (SPAC) called $Black Spade Acquisition Co.(BSAQ.U)$ . Vietnamese EV Maker VinFast Debuts on the Nasdaq, and Shares SoarVinFast's stock opened at $22 per share, which was more than double the $10 per share agreed upon with its SPAC partner. The stock price surged during the trading session, closing at $37.06. This increase in stock price valued the company at $85 billion, surpassing the market capitalizations of established automakers like $Ford(F)$ and","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/e8f2b9884fb60b92926562cc065e5a9c","width":"1500","height":"1001"},{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/f03a48bde1fee5784d4d86f8c8cb4157","width":"560","height":"240"},{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/973bede1c4301acc2a1d1323c0d97412","width":"2000","height":"1334"}],"top":1,"highlighted":2,"essential":2,"paper":2,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/209591040249872","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":0,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"subType":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":3,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2329,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":802887478,"gmtCreate":1627752665994,"gmtModify":1703495473018,"author":{"id":"3574834972684297","authorId":"3574834972684297","name":"Joanteo","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3574834972684297","idStr":"3574834972684297"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/802887478","repostId":"1154216466","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1154216466","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1627713678,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1154216466?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-31 14:41","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Antitrust Activists Want to Go Full Throttle. Here’s a Lesson They Should Consider First","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1154216466","media":"Barron's","summary":"About the author: Thomas W. Hazlett is H.H. Macaulay endowed professor of economics at Clemson Unive","content":"<p><i>About the author: Thomas W. Hazlett is H.H. Macaulay endowed professor of economics at Clemson University, and previously served as chief economist of the Federal Communications Commission.&nbsp;His latest book is</i>The Political Spectrum: The Tumultuous Liberation of Wireless Technologies, from Herbert Hoover to the Smartphone.</p>\n<p>Big Tech is in the antitrust hot seat. But before the Department of Justice tries to break up companies likeGoogleorApple,it should recall the history, and eventual outcome, of theAT&amp;T-Time Warner merger.</p>\n<p>The DOJ expended extensive time and resources to stop AT&amp;T’s acquisition of Time Warner, marking the department’s first challenge to a major vertical merger in over 40 years. The government was unsuccessful despite its best efforts, which included an appeal to the D.C. Circuit, and time reveals that its concerns were evidently misplaced all along. The merger did not result in higher prices, program blackouts, or even any appreciable advantage for the companies.</p>\n<p>In October 2016 AT&amp;Tannouncedits plan to buy Time Warner.&nbsp; Donald Trump’s presidential campaign trashed the merger in a statement: &nbsp;“AT&amp;T … is now trying to buy Time Warner and thus the wildly anti-Trump CNN. Donald Trump would never approve such a deal.”&nbsp; With Trump in office, the DOJ moved to block it.</p>\n<p>In 2017, the DOJ went to court tocomplainthat the merger would “substantially lessen competition in video” by allowing AT&amp;T to “use Time Warner’s ‘must have’” networks like CNN, TNT, TBS, and HBO to raise fees charged to rival cable TV distributors like Comcast or DISH. AT&amp;T, which had acquired national satellite operator DirecTV, could threaten “blackouts” depriving rival distributors of key programs—their subscribers would then quit and flock to DirecTV (AT&amp;T) so as to keep watching CNN or the NBA Playoffs on TNT. Not only would major TV and cable systems be hurt, but emerging online streaming services would be crushed.</p>\n<p>The government’s case focused on “vertical leveraging,” where a company uses two complementary products to make it more difficult for rivals to compete in the individual markets.&nbsp;Here, AT&amp;T was combining video content creation with video program distribution; the allegation was that competitors in either segment might be hurt.&nbsp;Yet there are clear efficiencies to be had, as widely found in studies of vertically integrated firms, with joint operations boosting consumer happiness. Buyers at Costco eagerly snap up Costco-supplied Kirkland products—which the retailer stocks in place of those of some independent producers—if they improve price or quality.&nbsp;So facts, not just a story, are needed.&nbsp; District Court Judge Richard J. Leonfoundthat the DOJ case “falls far short of establishing the validity of its… theory.”</p>\n<p>Aside from the political overtones of the case, there was good historical reason to doubt the official complaint. A cable TV programmer combined with (or split from) a video distributor several times in recent years.&nbsp;Vertical integration did not cause higher prices, as shown by econometric analysis. Nor did vertical integration lead to “blackouts,” as the DOJ conceded. A three-judge panel of the D.C. Circuit confirmed Judge Leon’s opinion, finding that “the industry had become dynamic in recent years with the emergence, for example, of Netflix and Hulu.”</p>\n<p>Owning DirecTV and Time Warner together turned out to be not much advantage, let alone a monopoly. Despite a huge boost in pandemic demand for video content, rivals soon dined on AT&amp;T-Time Warner’s lunch. When AT&amp;T bought DirecTV in 2015, it paid $67 billion.&nbsp;In February 2021, with DirecTV’s satellite subscriber base collapsing, the spun-off operation wasvaluedat $16.3 billion.</p>\n<p>And AT&amp;Tthen unloaded the video assets of Time Warner. A new enterprise—Warner Bros. Discovery—is being spun off and merged with Discovery (Discovery Channel, Animal Planet, TLC, HGTV, the Food Networkand more). The content-only firm voluntarily severs the link the DOJ critiqued as easy monopoly money. With the allegations of anticompetitive bundling, it has been cast off as not worth the trouble.AT&amp;T shareholders receive $43 billion, less than half the $100 billion AT&amp;T expended (in debt and equity) for Time Warner three years ago. The government’s scenario of anti-competitive vertical integration proved a fantasy.</p>\n<p>AT&amp;T’s maneuvers deserve whatever scorn billions in shareholder losses can buy. A cynic might offer that antitrust laws be beefed up to protect against such corporate errors, ignoring that economic penalties—more reliable and harsher than whatever antitrust enforcers might deal—are visibly in place. But little note has been made of the ironic political saga. Policymakers are moving full throttle to enact statutes to beef up antitrust prosecution in tech for exactly what AT&amp;T so spectacularly failed to do in video.&nbsp; Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) and Rep. Lance Gooden (R-Texas) introduced the “Ending Monopoly Platforms Act” that would restrict vertical mergers in online services, for example. At least five other bills for new antitrust rules have been introduced.</p>\n<p>Not only can such policies be expensive legal diversions, they can block the innovations igniting exciting new choices for customers. Netflix has integrated from streaming into movie production, after launching Roku. Hulu was created by News Corp. (Fox) and NBC-Universal (Comcast).&nbsp;Amazon Prime Video, Sling, YouTube TV, Apple TV, Disney Plus, HBO Max and Paramount Plus—each has extended a large media or e-commerce platform. Each evolved from a quest for better products. Treating entrepreneurship as suspect puts the screws to just the disruptions now roiling online entertainment markets. AT&amp;T learned the hard way that owning complementary products is no guarantee of success. </p>","source":"lsy1610680873436","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Antitrust Activists Want to Go Full Throttle. Here’s a Lesson They Should Consider First</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAntitrust Activists Want to Go Full Throttle. Here’s a Lesson They Should Consider First\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-31 14:41 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.barrons.com/articles/antitrust-activists-want-to-go-full-throttle-heres-a-lesson-they-should-consider-first-51627509048?mod=hp_COMMENTARY_3><strong>Barron's</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>About the author: Thomas W. Hazlett is H.H. Macaulay endowed professor of economics at Clemson University, and previously served as chief economist of the Federal Communications Commission. His latest...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/antitrust-activists-want-to-go-full-throttle-heres-a-lesson-they-should-consider-first-51627509048?mod=hp_COMMENTARY_3\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/antitrust-activists-want-to-go-full-throttle-heres-a-lesson-they-should-consider-first-51627509048?mod=hp_COMMENTARY_3","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1154216466","content_text":"About the author: Thomas W. Hazlett is H.H. Macaulay endowed professor of economics at Clemson University, and previously served as chief economist of the Federal Communications Commission. His latest book isThe Political Spectrum: The Tumultuous Liberation of Wireless Technologies, from Herbert Hoover to the Smartphone.\nBig Tech is in the antitrust hot seat. But before the Department of Justice tries to break up companies likeGoogleorApple,it should recall the history, and eventual outcome, of theAT&T-Time Warner merger.\nThe DOJ expended extensive time and resources to stop AT&T’s acquisition of Time Warner, marking the department’s first challenge to a major vertical merger in over 40 years. The government was unsuccessful despite its best efforts, which included an appeal to the D.C. Circuit, and time reveals that its concerns were evidently misplaced all along. The merger did not result in higher prices, program blackouts, or even any appreciable advantage for the companies.\nIn October 2016 AT&Tannouncedits plan to buy Time Warner.  Donald Trump’s presidential campaign trashed the merger in a statement:  “AT&T … is now trying to buy Time Warner and thus the wildly anti-Trump CNN. Donald Trump would never approve such a deal.”  With Trump in office, the DOJ moved to block it.\nIn 2017, the DOJ went to court tocomplainthat the merger would “substantially lessen competition in video” by allowing AT&T to “use Time Warner’s ‘must have’” networks like CNN, TNT, TBS, and HBO to raise fees charged to rival cable TV distributors like Comcast or DISH. AT&T, which had acquired national satellite operator DirecTV, could threaten “blackouts” depriving rival distributors of key programs—their subscribers would then quit and flock to DirecTV (AT&T) so as to keep watching CNN or the NBA Playoffs on TNT. Not only would major TV and cable systems be hurt, but emerging online streaming services would be crushed.\nThe government’s case focused on “vertical leveraging,” where a company uses two complementary products to make it more difficult for rivals to compete in the individual markets. Here, AT&T was combining video content creation with video program distribution; the allegation was that competitors in either segment might be hurt. Yet there are clear efficiencies to be had, as widely found in studies of vertically integrated firms, with joint operations boosting consumer happiness. Buyers at Costco eagerly snap up Costco-supplied Kirkland products—which the retailer stocks in place of those of some independent producers—if they improve price or quality. So facts, not just a story, are needed.  District Court Judge Richard J. Leonfoundthat the DOJ case “falls far short of establishing the validity of its… theory.”\nAside from the political overtones of the case, there was good historical reason to doubt the official complaint. A cable TV programmer combined with (or split from) a video distributor several times in recent years. Vertical integration did not cause higher prices, as shown by econometric analysis. Nor did vertical integration lead to “blackouts,” as the DOJ conceded. A three-judge panel of the D.C. Circuit confirmed Judge Leon’s opinion, finding that “the industry had become dynamic in recent years with the emergence, for example, of Netflix and Hulu.”\nOwning DirecTV and Time Warner together turned out to be not much advantage, let alone a monopoly. Despite a huge boost in pandemic demand for video content, rivals soon dined on AT&T-Time Warner’s lunch. When AT&T bought DirecTV in 2015, it paid $67 billion. In February 2021, with DirecTV’s satellite subscriber base collapsing, the spun-off operation wasvaluedat $16.3 billion.\nAnd AT&Tthen unloaded the video assets of Time Warner. A new enterprise—Warner Bros. Discovery—is being spun off and merged with Discovery (Discovery Channel, Animal Planet, TLC, HGTV, the Food Networkand more). The content-only firm voluntarily severs the link the DOJ critiqued as easy monopoly money. With the allegations of anticompetitive bundling, it has been cast off as not worth the trouble.AT&T shareholders receive $43 billion, less than half the $100 billion AT&T expended (in debt and equity) for Time Warner three years ago. The government’s scenario of anti-competitive vertical integration proved a fantasy.\nAT&T’s maneuvers deserve whatever scorn billions in shareholder losses can buy. A cynic might offer that antitrust laws be beefed up to protect against such corporate errors, ignoring that economic penalties—more reliable and harsher than whatever antitrust enforcers might deal—are visibly in place. But little note has been made of the ironic political saga. Policymakers are moving full throttle to enact statutes to beef up antitrust prosecution in tech for exactly what AT&T so spectacularly failed to do in video.  Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) and Rep. Lance Gooden (R-Texas) introduced the “Ending Monopoly Platforms Act” that would restrict vertical mergers in online services, for example. At least five other bills for new antitrust rules have been introduced.\nNot only can such policies be expensive legal diversions, they can block the innovations igniting exciting new choices for customers. Netflix has integrated from streaming into movie production, after launching Roku. Hulu was created by News Corp. (Fox) and NBC-Universal (Comcast). Amazon Prime Video, Sling, YouTube TV, Apple TV, Disney Plus, HBO Max and Paramount Plus—each has extended a large media or e-commerce platform. Each evolved from a quest for better products. Treating entrepreneurship as suspect puts the screws to just the disruptions now roiling online entertainment markets. AT&T learned the hard way that owning complementary products is no guarantee of success.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2047,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":808623750,"gmtCreate":1627574880770,"gmtModify":1703492768197,"author":{"id":"3574834972684297","authorId":"3574834972684297","name":"Joanteo","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3574834972684297","idStr":"3574834972684297"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/808623750","repostId":"1165345369","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2475,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":801167553,"gmtCreate":1627488711972,"gmtModify":1703491063434,"author":{"id":"3574834972684297","authorId":"3574834972684297","name":"Joanteo","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3574834972684297","idStr":"3574834972684297"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Wow","listText":"Wow","text":"Wow","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/801167553","repostId":"2154721924","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2154721924","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1627486574,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2154721924?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-28 23:36","market":"hk","language":"en","title":"Why AMD's Stock Is Trading Higher Today","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2154721924","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"AMD is trading higher Wednesday morning after the company late Tuesday announced better-than-expecte","content":"<p>AMD is trading higher Wednesday morning after the company late Tuesday announced better-than-expected second-quarter financial results and issued third-quarter guidance above estimates.</p>\n<p>AMD reported quarterly earnings of 63 cents per share, which beat the estimate of 54 cents per share. The company reported quarterly revenue of $3.85 billion, which beat the estimate of $3.62 billion. AMD said it expects third-quarter revenue to be in a range of $4 billion to $4.2 billion, which was&nbsp;higher than the estimate of $3.82 billion.</p>\n<p>\"Our business performed exceptionally well in the second quarter as revenue and operating margin doubled and profitability more than tripled year-over-year,” said Lisa Su,&nbsp;president and CEO of AMD.</p>\n<p><b>Analyst Assessment:</b>&nbsp;Rosenblatt analyst Hans Mosesmann maintained&nbsp;AMD&nbsp;with a Buy rating and raised&nbsp;the price target from&nbsp;$135&nbsp;to&nbsp;$150.</p>\n<p>Susquehanna analyst Christopher Rolland maintained&nbsp;AMD&nbsp;with a Positive rating and raised&nbsp;the price target from&nbsp;$125&nbsp;to&nbsp;$130.</p>\n<p><b>Price Action: </b>AMD has traded as high as $99.23 and as low as $67.02 over a 52-week period.</p>\n<p>At last check Wednesday, the stock was up 5% at $95.6.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a0dd3dd7be87bfa480b05a3c26ee3f62\" tg-width=\"840\" tg-height=\"470\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why AMD's Stock Is Trading Higher Today</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy AMD's Stock Is Trading Higher Today\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-07-28 23:36</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>AMD is trading higher Wednesday morning after the company late Tuesday announced better-than-expected second-quarter financial results and issued third-quarter guidance above estimates.</p>\n<p>AMD reported quarterly earnings of 63 cents per share, which beat the estimate of 54 cents per share. The company reported quarterly revenue of $3.85 billion, which beat the estimate of $3.62 billion. AMD said it expects third-quarter revenue to be in a range of $4 billion to $4.2 billion, which was&nbsp;higher than the estimate of $3.82 billion.</p>\n<p>\"Our business performed exceptionally well in the second quarter as revenue and operating margin doubled and profitability more than tripled year-over-year,” said Lisa Su,&nbsp;president and CEO of AMD.</p>\n<p><b>Analyst Assessment:</b>&nbsp;Rosenblatt analyst Hans Mosesmann maintained&nbsp;AMD&nbsp;with a Buy rating and raised&nbsp;the price target from&nbsp;$135&nbsp;to&nbsp;$150.</p>\n<p>Susquehanna analyst Christopher Rolland maintained&nbsp;AMD&nbsp;with a Positive rating and raised&nbsp;the price target from&nbsp;$125&nbsp;to&nbsp;$130.</p>\n<p><b>Price Action: </b>AMD has traded as high as $99.23 and as low as $67.02 over a 52-week period.</p>\n<p>At last check Wednesday, the stock was up 5% at $95.6.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a0dd3dd7be87bfa480b05a3c26ee3f62\" tg-width=\"840\" tg-height=\"470\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AMD":"美国超微公司"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2154721924","content_text":"AMD is trading higher Wednesday morning after the company late Tuesday announced better-than-expected second-quarter financial results and issued third-quarter guidance above estimates.\nAMD reported quarterly earnings of 63 cents per share, which beat the estimate of 54 cents per share. The company reported quarterly revenue of $3.85 billion, which beat the estimate of $3.62 billion. AMD said it expects third-quarter revenue to be in a range of $4 billion to $4.2 billion, which was higher than the estimate of $3.82 billion.\n\"Our business performed exceptionally well in the second quarter as revenue and operating margin doubled and profitability more than tripled year-over-year,” said Lisa Su, president and CEO of AMD.\nAnalyst Assessment: Rosenblatt analyst Hans Mosesmann maintained AMD with a Buy rating and raised the price target from $135 to $150.\nSusquehanna analyst Christopher Rolland maintained AMD with a Positive rating and raised the price target from $125 to $130.\nPrice Action: AMD has traded as high as $99.23 and as low as $67.02 over a 52-week period.\nAt last check Wednesday, the stock was up 5% at $95.6.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"AMD":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2515,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":801164494,"gmtCreate":1627488651618,"gmtModify":1703491062115,"author":{"id":"3574834972684297","authorId":"3574834972684297","name":"Joanteo","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3574834972684297","idStr":"3574834972684297"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/801164494","repostId":"2154360923","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3597,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":803075728,"gmtCreate":1627398844064,"gmtModify":1703489255856,"author":{"id":"3574834972684297","authorId":"3574834972684297","name":"Joanteo","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3574834972684297","idStr":"3574834972684297"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"?","listText":"?","text":"?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/803075728","repostId":"2154156259","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2093,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":809967539,"gmtCreate":1627344658421,"gmtModify":1703487916689,"author":{"id":"3574834972684297","authorId":"3574834972684297","name":"Joanteo","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3574834972684297","idStr":"3574834972684297"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/809967539","repostId":"2154640389","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1286,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":809965765,"gmtCreate":1627344601657,"gmtModify":1703487914102,"author":{"id":"3574834972684297","authorId":"3574834972684297","name":"Joanteo","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3574834972684297","idStr":"3574834972684297"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Wow","listText":"Wow","text":"Wow","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/809965765","repostId":"2154962767","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2154962767","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1627342961,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2154962767?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-27 07:42","market":"us","language":"en","title":"American Airlines warns pilots of fuel shortages, cites logistical issues","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2154962767","media":"Reuters","summary":"July 26 (Reuters) - American Airlines told pilots to conserve jet fuel supply when possible in a mem","content":"<p>July 26 (Reuters) - American Airlines told pilots to conserve jet fuel supply when possible in a memo on Monday, saying that transportation logistics, including lack of trucks and drivers, is delaying supply to airports throughout the United States.</p>\n<p>Fuel prices have been on the rise for several months as demand for gasoline and diesel has snapped back after the worst of the coronavirus pandemic. Refiners have ramped up processing in the last several months to respond to the recovery in fuel demand, but logistics companies have complained of a lack of available drivers.</p>\n<p>\"American Airlines station jet fuel delivery delays initially affected mostly western U.S. cities, but are now being reported at American stations across the country. Delivery delays are expected to continue through mid-August,\" the memo said.</p>\n<p>Gasoline, diesel and jet fuel demand plunged in 2020 due to the coronavirus pandemic, but air travel has rebounded more slowly than other modes of transportation, so refiners have been shipping less jet fuel.</p>\n<p>As of mid-July, refiners shipped roughly 1.4 million barrels of jet fuel on a daily basis, which is still about 22% below 2019 levels, according to the U.S. Energy Department. By contrast, gasoline supplied by refiners in mid-July nearly matches 2019's level.</p>\n<p>American, in a statement, said it was aware of fuel supply issues at some airports. \"American is currently experiencing minimal operational impact due to fuel supply issues. Our team continues to work around the clock to monitor the situation and minimize the impact on our customers,\" it said.</p>\n<p>Industry group Airlines For America said that carriers are having aircraft take extra fuel at non-affected airports to offset problems with fuel supply.</p>\n<p>U.S. domestic leisure travel has nearly recouped 2019 levels, and American has said it sees domestic business travel fully recovering next year.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>American Airlines warns pilots of fuel shortages, cites logistical issues</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAmerican Airlines warns pilots of fuel shortages, cites logistical issues\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-07-27 07:42</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>July 26 (Reuters) - American Airlines told pilots to conserve jet fuel supply when possible in a memo on Monday, saying that transportation logistics, including lack of trucks and drivers, is delaying supply to airports throughout the United States.</p>\n<p>Fuel prices have been on the rise for several months as demand for gasoline and diesel has snapped back after the worst of the coronavirus pandemic. Refiners have ramped up processing in the last several months to respond to the recovery in fuel demand, but logistics companies have complained of a lack of available drivers.</p>\n<p>\"American Airlines station jet fuel delivery delays initially affected mostly western U.S. cities, but are now being reported at American stations across the country. Delivery delays are expected to continue through mid-August,\" the memo said.</p>\n<p>Gasoline, diesel and jet fuel demand plunged in 2020 due to the coronavirus pandemic, but air travel has rebounded more slowly than other modes of transportation, so refiners have been shipping less jet fuel.</p>\n<p>As of mid-July, refiners shipped roughly 1.4 million barrels of jet fuel on a daily basis, which is still about 22% below 2019 levels, according to the U.S. Energy Department. By contrast, gasoline supplied by refiners in mid-July nearly matches 2019's level.</p>\n<p>American, in a statement, said it was aware of fuel supply issues at some airports. \"American is currently experiencing minimal operational impact due to fuel supply issues. Our team continues to work around the clock to monitor the situation and minimize the impact on our customers,\" it said.</p>\n<p>Industry group Airlines For America said that carriers are having aircraft take extra fuel at non-affected airports to offset problems with fuel supply.</p>\n<p>U.S. domestic leisure travel has nearly recouped 2019 levels, and American has said it sees domestic business travel fully recovering next year.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAL":"美国航空","AFG":"美国金融集团有限公司"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2154962767","content_text":"July 26 (Reuters) - American Airlines told pilots to conserve jet fuel supply when possible in a memo on Monday, saying that transportation logistics, including lack of trucks and drivers, is delaying supply to airports throughout the United States.\nFuel prices have been on the rise for several months as demand for gasoline and diesel has snapped back after the worst of the coronavirus pandemic. Refiners have ramped up processing in the last several months to respond to the recovery in fuel demand, but logistics companies have complained of a lack of available drivers.\n\"American Airlines station jet fuel delivery delays initially affected mostly western U.S. cities, but are now being reported at American stations across the country. Delivery delays are expected to continue through mid-August,\" the memo said.\nGasoline, diesel and jet fuel demand plunged in 2020 due to the coronavirus pandemic, but air travel has rebounded more slowly than other modes of transportation, so refiners have been shipping less jet fuel.\nAs of mid-July, refiners shipped roughly 1.4 million barrels of jet fuel on a daily basis, which is still about 22% below 2019 levels, according to the U.S. Energy Department. By contrast, gasoline supplied by refiners in mid-July nearly matches 2019's level.\nAmerican, in a statement, said it was aware of fuel supply issues at some airports. \"American is currently experiencing minimal operational impact due to fuel supply issues. Our team continues to work around the clock to monitor the situation and minimize the impact on our customers,\" it said.\nIndustry group Airlines For America said that carriers are having aircraft take extra fuel at non-affected airports to offset problems with fuel supply.\nU.S. domestic leisure travel has nearly recouped 2019 levels, and American has said it sees domestic business travel fully recovering next year.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"QMmain":0.9,"CLmain":0.9,"AFG":0.9,"AAL":0.9,"AMSWA":0.9,"RBmain":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1049,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":809962960,"gmtCreate":1627344564750,"gmtModify":1703487912654,"author":{"id":"3574834972684297","authorId":"3574834972684297","name":"Joanteo","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3574834972684297","idStr":"3574834972684297"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/809962960","repostId":"1153028059","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1153028059","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1627340900,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1153028059?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-27 07:08","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Tesla sales surge 98%; company boosts margins on its less-costly electric cars","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1153028059","media":"Reuters","summary":" -Tesla Inc posted a bigger second-quarter profit than expected on Tuesday thanks to sharply higher sales of its less-expensive electric vehicles, as it raised prices to boost its margins on them.Tesla also cut costs which helped it offset many of the supply chain and microchip shortfalls facing the auto industry.For the first time since late 2019, Tesla profits did not rely on sales of environmental credits to other automakers, a sign of increasing financial health for the manufacturing operati","content":"<p>(Reuters) -Tesla Inc posted a bigger second-quarter profit than expected on Tuesday thanks to sharply higher sales of its less-expensive electric vehicles, as it raised prices to boost its margins on them.</p>\n<p>Tesla also cut costs which helped it offset many of the supply chain and microchip shortfalls facing the auto industry.</p>\n<p>For the first time since late 2019, Tesla profits did not rely on sales of environmental credits to other automakers, a sign of increasing financial health for the manufacturing operation. Tesla boosted its performance by cutting features it said were unused or unneeded and raising U.S. vehicle prices.</p>\n<p>Shares of the world’s most valuable automaker rose 1.5% in extended trade.</p>\n<p>In a call with investors and analysts, Tesla executives said that volume production growth will depend on parts availability, and Musk cautioned the shortage of semiconductors will continue.</p>\n<p>“The global chip shortage situation remains quite serious,” Musk said.</p>\n<p>Still, Musk said Tesla expects to launch production this year of the Model Y SUV at factories under construction in Texas and Germany. He said the company expects battery cell suppliers to double production next year.</p>\n<p>Despite the pandemic and the supply chain crisis, Tesla posted record deliveries during the quarter, thanks to sales of cheaper models including Model 3 sedans and Model Ys.</p>\n<p>The carmaker, led by billionaire entrepreneur Elon Musk, said revenue jumped to $11.96 billion from $6.04 billion a year earlier, when its California factory was shut down for more than six weeks due to local lockdown orders to fight the pandemic.</p>\n<p>Analysts had expected revenue of about $11.3 billion, according to IBES data from Refinitiv.</p>\n<p>Excluding items, Tesla posted a profit of $1.45 per share, easily topping analyst expectations for a profit of 98 cents per share.</p>\n<p>Tesla said operating income rose with volume growth and cost reduction, which offset higher supply chain costs, lower regulatory credit revenue and other items including $23 million in losses on investment in cryptocurrency bitcoin.</p>\n<p>Tesla’s profitability has often relied on selling regulatory credits to other automakers, but in the second quarter, Tesla was profitable without these credits for the first time since the end of 2019. Its GAAP net income was $1.14 billion in the second quarter. Revenue from the credits only totaled $354 million.</p>\n<p>“Tesla impressed with its numbers, as most of its revenue came from vehicle sales,” Jesse Cohen, senior analyst at Investing.com, said.</p>\n<p>Carmaker Stellantis expects to achieve its European carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions targets this year without environmental credits bought from Tesla.</p>\n<p>Tesla said it said it has delayed the launch of the Semi truck program to 2022 to focus on starting factories and due to limited availability of battery cells and other parts this year.</p>\n<p>But the company’s new 4680 batteries are not ready for volume production; executives said it was difficult to predict when technological challenges would be resolved.</p>\n<p>In an aside, Musk said he “most likely will not be on earnings calls” going forward to discuss financial results with investors and analysts. These calls have been a colorful quarterly ritual Musk has used for discourses on Tesla technology, or to fire back at rivals or critics.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Tesla sales surge 98%; company boosts margins on its less-costly electric cars</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTesla sales surge 98%; company boosts margins on its less-costly electric cars\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-27 07:08 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.reuters.com/article/tesla-results/update-4-tesla-sales-surge-98-company-boosts-margins-on-its-less-costly-electric-cars-idUSL4N2P23I5><strong>Reuters</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>(Reuters) -Tesla Inc posted a bigger second-quarter profit than expected on Tuesday thanks to sharply higher sales of its less-expensive electric vehicles, as it raised prices to boost its margins on ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.reuters.com/article/tesla-results/update-4-tesla-sales-surge-98-company-boosts-margins-on-its-less-costly-electric-cars-idUSL4N2P23I5\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"https://www.reuters.com/article/tesla-results/update-4-tesla-sales-surge-98-company-boosts-margins-on-its-less-costly-electric-cars-idUSL4N2P23I5","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1153028059","content_text":"(Reuters) -Tesla Inc posted a bigger second-quarter profit than expected on Tuesday thanks to sharply higher sales of its less-expensive electric vehicles, as it raised prices to boost its margins on them.\nTesla also cut costs which helped it offset many of the supply chain and microchip shortfalls facing the auto industry.\nFor the first time since late 2019, Tesla profits did not rely on sales of environmental credits to other automakers, a sign of increasing financial health for the manufacturing operation. Tesla boosted its performance by cutting features it said were unused or unneeded and raising U.S. vehicle prices.\nShares of the world’s most valuable automaker rose 1.5% in extended trade.\nIn a call with investors and analysts, Tesla executives said that volume production growth will depend on parts availability, and Musk cautioned the shortage of semiconductors will continue.\n“The global chip shortage situation remains quite serious,” Musk said.\nStill, Musk said Tesla expects to launch production this year of the Model Y SUV at factories under construction in Texas and Germany. He said the company expects battery cell suppliers to double production next year.\nDespite the pandemic and the supply chain crisis, Tesla posted record deliveries during the quarter, thanks to sales of cheaper models including Model 3 sedans and Model Ys.\nThe carmaker, led by billionaire entrepreneur Elon Musk, said revenue jumped to $11.96 billion from $6.04 billion a year earlier, when its California factory was shut down for more than six weeks due to local lockdown orders to fight the pandemic.\nAnalysts had expected revenue of about $11.3 billion, according to IBES data from Refinitiv.\nExcluding items, Tesla posted a profit of $1.45 per share, easily topping analyst expectations for a profit of 98 cents per share.\nTesla said operating income rose with volume growth and cost reduction, which offset higher supply chain costs, lower regulatory credit revenue and other items including $23 million in losses on investment in cryptocurrency bitcoin.\nTesla’s profitability has often relied on selling regulatory credits to other automakers, but in the second quarter, Tesla was profitable without these credits for the first time since the end of 2019. Its GAAP net income was $1.14 billion in the second quarter. Revenue from the credits only totaled $354 million.\n“Tesla impressed with its numbers, as most of its revenue came from vehicle sales,” Jesse Cohen, senior analyst at Investing.com, said.\nCarmaker Stellantis expects to achieve its European carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions targets this year without environmental credits bought from Tesla.\nTesla said it said it has delayed the launch of the Semi truck program to 2022 to focus on starting factories and due to limited availability of battery cells and other parts this year.\nBut the company’s new 4680 batteries are not ready for volume production; executives said it was difficult to predict when technological challenges would be resolved.\nIn an aside, Musk said he “most likely will not be on earnings calls” going forward to discuss financial results with investors and analysts. These calls have been a colorful quarterly ritual Musk has used for discourses on Tesla technology, or to fire back at rivals or critics.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"TSLA":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":852,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":800735545,"gmtCreate":1627317877987,"gmtModify":1703487586976,"author":{"id":"3574834972684297","authorId":"3574834972684297","name":"Joanteo","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3574834972684297","idStr":"3574834972684297"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Wow","listText":"Wow","text":"Wow","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/800735545","repostId":"1100647798","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1100647798","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1627313442,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1100647798?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-26 23:30","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Earnings Face High Expectations","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1100647798","media":"seekingalpha","summary":"After the bell on Tuesday, we'll receive fiscal third quarter results from technology giant Apple  for its June ending period. With the company's previous two quarterly earnings reports smashing street estimates, it's not really a surprise that expectations have continued to rise. With shares rallying in recent weeks to new all-time highs, another strong report will likely be needed to keep things going.I'm sure analysts will also be looking to see how Apple has navigated the chip shortage as we","content":"<p><b>Summary</b></p>\n<ul>\n <li>Shares go into report near all-time high.</li>\n <li>Estimates surge after two massive beats.</li>\n <li>Timing of product launches will shift revenue picture.</li>\n</ul>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bdd5b8fd99a0523d96bf052afd8c1b37\" tg-width=\"1536\" tg-height=\"988\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Nikada/iStock Unreleased via Getty Images</span></p>\n<p>After the bell on Tuesday, we'll receive fiscal third quarter results from technology giant Apple (AAPL) for its June ending period. With the company's previous two quarterly earnings reports smashing street estimates, it's not really a surprise that expectations have continued to rise. With shares rallying in recent weeks to new all-time highs, another strong report will likely be needed to keep things going.</p>\n<p>For the first half of fiscal 2021, Apple's revenues have beaten street estimates by an average of $10.25 billion per quarter. The fiscal Q3&nbsp;current average estimate&nbsp;is $73.44 billion, which would represent growth of more than 23% from the year-ago period. It's quite impressive that the current average is up more than $13 billion over the past year. On the bottom line, the street is looking for $1.01, growth of more than 56%. In the table below, you can see some Q3 key financial items for the past two years, with the current estimates for this year's period in yellow. Dollar values are millions except per share amounts.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/df8630a7ef0be70113aeac0d50265a57\" tg-width=\"476\" tg-height=\"361\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>(*Numbers estimated based on last year's split. Actual numbers to come from the company. Source: Fiscal Q3 2020 report)</span></p>\n<p>Apple is comingoff arguably&nbsp;its best quarter ever. Revenues for the iPhone were up more than 65.5% over the prior-year period, with the Mac up more than 70% and iPad up nearly 79%. Fiscal Q2 overall revenue growth was nearly 54%, so this time around we're looking for about 40% of that figure. Don't forget, on the&nbsp;Q2 conference call, management talked about a $3 billion to $4 billion revenue hit in the June period from supply constraints.</p>\n<p>I'm most curious to see how the iPhone does this time around, as it appears that the 5G supercycle seems to be going pretty well. This year, however, most expectations are that the smartphone will return to its usual September launch period, meaning new phone revenues would be generated in fiscal Q4 again. Last year's coronavirus delayed launch meant sales didn't start until well into October and even November for some models, completely changing the sales trajectory for Apple's current fiscal year. This year's launch isn't expected to see a major upgrade to the phone line itself, so demand trends will probably be more dependent on how many consumers are upgrading to 5G rather than switching to iPhones.</p>\n<p>I'm sure analysts will also be looking to see how Apple has navigated the chip shortage as well as soaring commodity prices. I don't think we will see a repeat of the 575 basis point increase in product gross margins that Q2 saw this time around, but the iPhone 12 line should still provide a nice year-over-year boost. In the long run, investors will look at growing services margins helping the gross margin percentage overall, but don't forget that the services side of the business has a lot of its expenses on the operating line.</p>\n<p>For the stock to stay elevated, management is going to need to show that work from home and stimulus money tailwinds are still ongoing. As I discussed in&nbsp;a previous article, estimates call for Apple to see quarterly revenues decline for its March 2022 fiscal period, as the company laps very high previous year bars. While that might bring out some of the bears again, the long-term trajectory still seems positive. Current estimates call for $355 billion in total revenue during this fiscal year with Apple adding another $50 billion to that total over the next three years.</p>\n<p>I hope that management took advantage of the weakness in Apple shares during the quarter for its buyback. Even though the company is spending $20 billion or so every three months, that money doesn't go as far as $145 as it does at $125, obviously. Less shares repurchased means less of an earnings per share benefit, and lower long-term dividend raises. The good news is that Apple is on its way towards $100 billion a year in free cash flow, so investors don't need to worry about capital returns slowing down anytime soon.</p>\n<p>The major issue for Apple right now is valuation. Shares finished last week trading at 33.4 times their trailing twelve-month earnings. That's basically double the mid-teens numbers from a couple of years ago, helped a lot by easy-money policies around the globe. My current price target of $162 is based on a 30X multiple of $5.40 in EPS for the September 2022 period. That number, however, assumes that the Fed and other central banks will remain fairly accommodative through most of next year. If we start to get a lot of tapering and or rate hikes earlier than expected, the overall market is likely to feel some pain, and I don't see how Apple would be immune from that.</p>\n<p>A strong report from Apple could easily help shares to rise to a new all-time high. But just to play devil's advocate for a minute, what if there is a disappointment or a \"buy the rumor, sell the news\" reaction? Well, shares are quite a bit above their key moving averages as seen in the chart below (50-day in purple, 200-day in orange). As long as Apple can hold the shorter-term trend line, that rising technical level should be one of support. The stock has been able to hold the long-term trend line for quite a while, so I don't see any more than about 14% downside in the near term unless we get a major market pullback.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/dc37ee144edb22fd36fcd15cf5fc3470\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"273\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>(Source: Yahoo! Finance)</span></p>\n<p>In the end, expectations for Apple are very high as earnings approach this week. Two massive quarterly beats have sent estimates through the roof, and the stock has recently run to a new all-time high. The market will be looking for signs that the iPhone supercycle has continued while work from home tailwinds have not subsided just yet. Investors hoping that this rally can continue will need to see a strong report, with management hopefully painting a bright sales picture for upcoming fall product launches.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Earnings Face High Expectations</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Earnings Face High Expectations\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-26 23:30 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4441375-apple-earnings-face-high-expectations><strong>seekingalpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Summary\n\nShares go into report near all-time high.\nEstimates surge after two massive beats.\nTiming of product launches will shift revenue picture.\n\nNikada/iStock Unreleased via Getty Images\nAfter the ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4441375-apple-earnings-face-high-expectations\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4441375-apple-earnings-face-high-expectations","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1100647798","content_text":"Summary\n\nShares go into report near all-time high.\nEstimates surge after two massive beats.\nTiming of product launches will shift revenue picture.\n\nNikada/iStock Unreleased via Getty Images\nAfter the bell on Tuesday, we'll receive fiscal third quarter results from technology giant Apple (AAPL) for its June ending period. With the company's previous two quarterly earnings reports smashing street estimates, it's not really a surprise that expectations have continued to rise. With shares rallying in recent weeks to new all-time highs, another strong report will likely be needed to keep things going.\nFor the first half of fiscal 2021, Apple's revenues have beaten street estimates by an average of $10.25 billion per quarter. The fiscal Q3 current average estimate is $73.44 billion, which would represent growth of more than 23% from the year-ago period. It's quite impressive that the current average is up more than $13 billion over the past year. On the bottom line, the street is looking for $1.01, growth of more than 56%. In the table below, you can see some Q3 key financial items for the past two years, with the current estimates for this year's period in yellow. Dollar values are millions except per share amounts.\n(*Numbers estimated based on last year's split. Actual numbers to come from the company. Source: Fiscal Q3 2020 report)\nApple is comingoff arguably its best quarter ever. Revenues for the iPhone were up more than 65.5% over the prior-year period, with the Mac up more than 70% and iPad up nearly 79%. Fiscal Q2 overall revenue growth was nearly 54%, so this time around we're looking for about 40% of that figure. Don't forget, on the Q2 conference call, management talked about a $3 billion to $4 billion revenue hit in the June period from supply constraints.\nI'm most curious to see how the iPhone does this time around, as it appears that the 5G supercycle seems to be going pretty well. This year, however, most expectations are that the smartphone will return to its usual September launch period, meaning new phone revenues would be generated in fiscal Q4 again. Last year's coronavirus delayed launch meant sales didn't start until well into October and even November for some models, completely changing the sales trajectory for Apple's current fiscal year. This year's launch isn't expected to see a major upgrade to the phone line itself, so demand trends will probably be more dependent on how many consumers are upgrading to 5G rather than switching to iPhones.\nI'm sure analysts will also be looking to see how Apple has navigated the chip shortage as well as soaring commodity prices. I don't think we will see a repeat of the 575 basis point increase in product gross margins that Q2 saw this time around, but the iPhone 12 line should still provide a nice year-over-year boost. In the long run, investors will look at growing services margins helping the gross margin percentage overall, but don't forget that the services side of the business has a lot of its expenses on the operating line.\nFor the stock to stay elevated, management is going to need to show that work from home and stimulus money tailwinds are still ongoing. As I discussed in a previous article, estimates call for Apple to see quarterly revenues decline for its March 2022 fiscal period, as the company laps very high previous year bars. While that might bring out some of the bears again, the long-term trajectory still seems positive. Current estimates call for $355 billion in total revenue during this fiscal year with Apple adding another $50 billion to that total over the next three years.\nI hope that management took advantage of the weakness in Apple shares during the quarter for its buyback. Even though the company is spending $20 billion or so every three months, that money doesn't go as far as $145 as it does at $125, obviously. Less shares repurchased means less of an earnings per share benefit, and lower long-term dividend raises. The good news is that Apple is on its way towards $100 billion a year in free cash flow, so investors don't need to worry about capital returns slowing down anytime soon.\nThe major issue for Apple right now is valuation. Shares finished last week trading at 33.4 times their trailing twelve-month earnings. That's basically double the mid-teens numbers from a couple of years ago, helped a lot by easy-money policies around the globe. My current price target of $162 is based on a 30X multiple of $5.40 in EPS for the September 2022 period. That number, however, assumes that the Fed and other central banks will remain fairly accommodative through most of next year. If we start to get a lot of tapering and or rate hikes earlier than expected, the overall market is likely to feel some pain, and I don't see how Apple would be immune from that.\nA strong report from Apple could easily help shares to rise to a new all-time high. But just to play devil's advocate for a minute, what if there is a disappointment or a \"buy the rumor, sell the news\" reaction? Well, shares are quite a bit above their key moving averages as seen in the chart below (50-day in purple, 200-day in orange). As long as Apple can hold the shorter-term trend line, that rising technical level should be one of support. The stock has been able to hold the long-term trend line for quite a while, so I don't see any more than about 14% downside in the near term unless we get a major market pullback.\n(Source: Yahoo! Finance)\nIn the end, expectations for Apple are very high as earnings approach this week. Two massive quarterly beats have sent estimates through the roof, and the stock has recently run to a new all-time high. The market will be looking for signs that the iPhone supercycle has continued while work from home tailwinds have not subsided just yet. Investors hoping that this rally can continue will need to see a strong report, with management hopefully painting a bright sales picture for upcoming fall product launches.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"AAPL":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":781,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":800735188,"gmtCreate":1627317844144,"gmtModify":1703487586289,"author":{"id":"3574834972684297","authorId":"3574834972684297","name":"Joanteo","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3574834972684297","idStr":"3574834972684297"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/800735188","repostId":"2154957883","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1175,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":177505219,"gmtCreate":1627234342431,"gmtModify":1703485822270,"author":{"id":"3574834972684297","authorId":"3574834972684297","name":"Joanteo","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3574834972684297","idStr":"3574834972684297"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/177505219","repostId":"2153936352","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":930,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":177505030,"gmtCreate":1627234217520,"gmtModify":1703485821443,"author":{"id":"3574834972684297","authorId":"3574834972684297","name":"Joanteo","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3574834972684297","idStr":"3574834972684297"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/177505030","repostId":"1115106146","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":640,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":174932849,"gmtCreate":1627056598781,"gmtModify":1703483583187,"author":{"id":"3574834972684297","authorId":"3574834972684297","name":"Joanteo","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3574834972684297","idStr":"3574834972684297"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good&nbsp;","listText":"Good&nbsp;","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/174932849","repostId":"2153984757","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":807,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":174936515,"gmtCreate":1627056553437,"gmtModify":1703483582213,"author":{"id":"3574834972684297","authorId":"3574834972684297","name":"Joanteo","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3574834972684297","idStr":"3574834972684297"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/174936515","repostId":"2153983997","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":692,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":178829993,"gmtCreate":1626798467112,"gmtModify":1703765494806,"author":{"id":"3574834972684297","authorId":"3574834972684297","name":"Joanteo","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3574834972684297","idStr":"3574834972684297"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/178829993","repostId":"1177437175","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1177437175","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Stock Market Quotes, Business News, Financial News, Trading Ideas, and Stock Research by Professionals","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Benzinga","id":"1052270027","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa"},"pubTimestamp":1626791614,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1177437175?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-20 22:33","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Stocks That Hit 52-Week Lows On Tuesday","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1177437175","media":"Benzinga","summary":"Before 10 a.m. ET Tuesday, 64 stocks made new 52-week lows.\nKey Facts:\n\nTotalEnergies(NYSE:TTE) was ","content":"<p>Before 10 a.m. ET Tuesday, 64 stocks made new 52-week lows.</p>\n<p>Key Facts:</p>\n<ul>\n <li><b>TotalEnergies</b>(NYSE:TTE) was the largest, in terms of market cap, to set a new 52-week low.</li>\n <li>The company with the smallest market cap to set a new 52-week low was<b>Sonoma Pharmaceuticals</b>(NASDAQ:SNOA).</li>\n <li><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ARDX\">Ardelyx</a></b>(NASDAQ:ARDX) made the largest move down on the session, with shares plummeting 75.24% to reach its 52-week low.</li>\n</ul>\n<p>Here is a list of stocks that set new 52-week lows during the first half-hour of trading on Tuesday:</p>\n<ul>\n <li><b>TotalEnergies</b>(NYSE:TTE) shares set a new 52-week low of $40.33. The stock traded down 1.23%.</li>\n <li><b>DiDi Global</b>(NYSE:DIDI) stock set a new 52-week low of $10.69 on Tuesday, moving down 1.54%.</li>\n <li><b>China Life Insurance Co</b>(NYSE:LFC) shares set a new yearly low of $8.68 this morning. The stock was 0.0% (flat) on the session.</li>\n <li><b>Lufax Holding</b>(NYSE:LU) shares reached a new 52-week low of $8.50 on Tuesday morning, moving down 1.95%.</li>\n <li><b>Tencent Music Enter Gr</b>(NYSE:TME) stock drifted down 0.61% on Tuesday morning to hit a new 52-week low of $11.24.</li>\n <li><b>Autohome</b>(NYSE:ATHM) shares set a new yearly low of $57.65 this morning. The stock was down 3.11% on the session.</li>\n <li><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ABCL\">AbCellera Biologics</a></b>(NASDAQ:ABCL) shares moved down 3.38% on Tuesday to hit a new 52-week low of $15.80, drifting down 3.38%.</li>\n <li><b>Abcam</b>(NASDAQ:ABCM) stock hit $17.34 on Tuesday morning, setting a new 52-week low for a change of down 1.41%.</li>\n <li><b>Agora</b>(NASDAQ:API) shares moved down 5.09% on Tuesday to hit a new 52-week low of $32.59, drifting down 5.09%.</li>\n <li><b>OneConnect Financial Tech</b>(NYSE:OCFT) stock set a new 52-week low of $9.26 on Tuesday, moving down 0.84%.</li>\n <li><b>HUYA</b>(NYSE:HUYA) stock hit a yearly low of $13.80. The stock was down 2.15% for the day.</li>\n <li><b>SolarWinds</b>(NYSE:SWI) stock dropped to a yearly low on Tuesday of $9.80. Shares traded down 39.72%.</li>\n <li><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GOCO\">GoHealth</a></b>(NASDAQ:GOCO) stock broke to a new 52-week low of $9.27 on Tuesday. Shares of the company traded up 0.74%.</li>\n <li><b>Genius Sports</b>(NYSE:GENI) shares fell to $14.86 on Tuesday, setting a new 52-week low with a shift of down 0.92%.</li>\n <li><b>Gaotu Techedu</b>(NYSE:GOTU) stock set a new 52-week low of $9.86 on Tuesday, moving up 0.84%.</li>\n <li><b>MorphoSys</b>(NASDAQ:MOR) stock drifted down 1.77% on Tuesday morning to hit a new 52-week low of $16.04.</li>\n <li><b>Custom Truck One Source</b>(NYSE:CTOS) stock achieved a new 52-week low on Tuesday morning, hitting $7.92 and moving down 1.35%.</li>\n <li><b>Root</b>(NASDAQ:ROOT) stock achieved a new 52-week low on Tuesday morning, hitting $7.56 and moving down 3.39%.</li>\n <li><b>Outset Medical</b>(NASDAQ:OM) shares were up 0.36% for the day, having made a 52-week low of $40.98.</li>\n <li><b>Taboola.com</b>(NASDAQ:TBLA) stock dropped to a yearly low on Tuesday of $8.37. Shares traded up 1.05%.</li>\n <li><b>ATI Physical Therapy</b>(NYSE:ATIP) shares set a new yearly low of $7.72 this morning. The stock was up 0.19% on the session.</li>\n <li><b>Velodyne Lidar</b>(NASDAQ:VLDR) stock drifted down 5.48% on Tuesday morning to hit a new 52-week low of $8.03.</li>\n <li><b>GrubHub</b>(NASDAQ:GRUB) shares made a new 52-week low of $15.64 on Tuesday. The stock was down 3.8% for the day.</li>\n <li><b>DouYu International Hldgs</b>(NASDAQ:DOYU) stock hit a yearly low of $4.31. The stock was down 1.35% for the day.</li>\n <li><b>Singular Genomics Systems</b>(NASDAQ:OMIC) shares set a new yearly low of $18.35 this morning. The stock was down 4.72% on the session.</li>\n <li><b>Viant Technology</b>(NASDAQ:DSP) stock hit a yearly low of $16.37. The stock was down 3.22% for the day.</li>\n <li><b>Origin Materials</b>(NASDAQ:ORGN) shares reached a new 52-week low of $6.63 on Tuesday morning, moving down 0.37%.</li>\n <li><b>Meta Materials</b>(NASDAQ:MMAT) stock hit a yearly low of $3.23. The stock was down 4.88% for the day.</li>\n <li><b>Montauk Renewables</b>(NASDAQ:MNTK) shares hit a yearly low of $6.15. The stock was down 1.97% on the session.</li>\n <li><b>CareMax</b>(NASDAQ:CMAX) stock hit a yearly low of $10.25. The stock was up 0.05% for the day.</li>\n <li><b>HIVE Blockchain</b>(NASDAQ:HVBT) stock set a new 52-week low of $1.87 on Tuesday, moving down 4.54%.</li>\n <li><b>Pharming</b>(NASDAQ:PHAR) shares were down 0.15% for the day, having made a 52-week low of $10.80.</li>\n <li><b>AltC Acquisition</b>(NYSE:ALCC) shares reached a new 52-week low of $9.85 on Tuesday morning, moving up 0.09%.</li>\n <li><b>Convey Holding Parent</b>(NYSE:CNVY) stock achieved a new 52-week low on Tuesday morning, hitting $7.74 and moving down 1.02%.</li>\n <li><b>Bitfarms</b>(NASDAQ:BITF) stock dropped to a yearly low on Tuesday of $2.81. Shares traded down 3.93%.</li>\n <li><b>Nordic American Tankers</b>(NYSE:NAT) shares fell to $2.59 on Tuesday, setting a new 52-week low with a shift of up 1.15%.</li>\n <li><b>Orchard Therapeutics</b>(NASDAQ:ORTX) shares hit a yearly low of $3.20. The stock was 0.0% (flat) on the session.</li>\n <li><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CTMX\">CytomX</a> Therapeutics</b>(NASDAQ:CTMX) stock hit a new 52-week low of $5.63. The stock was 0.0% (flat) on the session.</li>\n <li><b>Alexco Resource</b>(AMEX:AXU) shares set a new yearly low of $1.99 this morning. The stock was up 1.99% on the session.</li>\n <li><b>Sera Prognostics</b>(NASDAQ:SERA) shares moved down 0.2% on Tuesday to hit a new 52-week low of $9.51, drifting down 0.2%.</li>\n <li><b>Dynamics Special Purpose</b>(NASDAQ:DYNS) shares moved down 0.2% on Tuesday to hit a new 52-week low of $9.76, drifting down 0.2%.</li>\n <li><b>Golden Star Resources</b>(AMEX:GSS) stock set a new 52-week low of $2.20 on Tuesday, moving 0.0% (flat).</li>\n <li><b>AGM Gr Hldgs</b>(NASDAQ:AGMH) stock set a new 52-week low of $8.60 on Tuesday, moving down 4.72%.</li>\n <li><b>Freeline Therapeutics</b>(NASDAQ:FRLN) shares reached a new 52-week low of $6.07 on Tuesday morning, moving down 5.97%.</li>\n <li><b>Ensysce Biosciences</b>(NASDAQ:ENSC) stock achieved a new 52-week low on Tuesday morning, hitting $8.80 and moving down 6.84%.</li>\n <li><b>4d pharma</b>(NASDAQ:LBPS) shares moved down 1.47% on Tuesday to hit a new 52-week low of $9.36, drifting down 1.47%.</li>\n <li><b>Diginex</b>(NASDAQ:EQOS) stock broke to a new 52-week low of $4.89 on Tuesday. Shares of the company traded down 2.38%.</li>\n <li><b>Ardelyx</b>(NASDAQ:ARDX) shares were down 75.24% for the day, having made a 52-week low of $1.83.</li>\n <li><b>ARYA Sciences Acquisition</b>(NASDAQ:ARYE) stock drifted down 0.7% on Tuesday morning to hit a new 52-week low of $9.96.</li>\n <li><b>Pop Culture Gr</b>(NASDAQ:CPOP) stock drifted down 1.61% on Tuesday morning to hit a new 52-week low of $6.57.</li>\n <li><b>First Capital</b>(NASDAQ:FCAP) shares moved up 2.32% on Tuesday to hit a new 52-week low of $42.55, drifting up 2.32%.</li>\n <li><b>Medicenna Therapeutics</b>(NASDAQ:MDNA) stock broke to a new 52-week low of $2.45 on Tuesday. Shares of the company traded down 2.77%.</li>\n <li><b>Sunlands Technology</b>(NYSE:STG) stock achieved a new 52-week low on Tuesday morning, hitting $0.76 and moving down 4.31%.</li>\n <li><b>Bridgford Foods</b>(NASDAQ:BRID) shares made a new 52-week low of $13.00 on Tuesday. The stock was down 0.31% for the day.</li>\n <li><b>Liminal Biosciences</b>(NASDAQ:LMNL) stock set a new 52-week low of $3.27 on Tuesday, moving up 0.19%.</li>\n <li><b>Intrusion</b>(NASDAQ:INTZ) stock hit a yearly low of $4.32. The stock was down 47.29% for the day.</li>\n <li><b>Jiuzi Holdings</b>(NASDAQ:JZXN) shares set a new 52-week low of $3.51. The stock traded down 5.41%.</li>\n <li><b>Versus Systems</b>(NASDAQ:VS) shares set a new 52-week low of $4.52. The stock traded down 0.62%.</li>\n <li><b>Tian Ruixiang Holdings</b>(NASDAQ:TIRX) stock set a new 52-week low of $4.56 on Tuesday, moving up 0.15%.</li>\n <li><b>ECMOHO</b>(NASDAQ:MOHO) shares fell to $1.25 on Tuesday, setting a new 52-week low with a shift of down 5.04%.</li>\n <li><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CEMI\">Chembio Diagnostics</a></b>(NASDAQ:CEMI) shares made a new 52-week low of $2.20 on Tuesday. The stock was down 7.52% for the day.</li>\n <li><b>DallasNews</b>(NASDAQ:DALN) shares reached a new 52-week low of $6.39 on Tuesday morning, moving up 0.2%.</li>\n <li><b>BiondVax Pharmaceuticals</b>(NASDAQ:BVXV) shares moved down 2.4% on Tuesday to hit a new 52-week low of $2.28, drifting down 2.4%.</li>\n <li><b>Sonoma Pharmaceuticals</b>(NASDAQ:SNOA) stock broke to a new 52-week low of $5.36 on Tuesday. Shares of the company traded down 4.72%.</li>\n</ul>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Stocks That Hit 52-Week Lows On Tuesday</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nStocks That Hit 52-Week Lows On Tuesday\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Benzinga </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-07-20 22:33</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Before 10 a.m. ET Tuesday, 64 stocks made new 52-week lows.</p>\n<p>Key Facts:</p>\n<ul>\n <li><b>TotalEnergies</b>(NYSE:TTE) was the largest, in terms of market cap, to set a new 52-week low.</li>\n <li>The company with the smallest market cap to set a new 52-week low was<b>Sonoma Pharmaceuticals</b>(NASDAQ:SNOA).</li>\n <li><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ARDX\">Ardelyx</a></b>(NASDAQ:ARDX) made the largest move down on the session, with shares plummeting 75.24% to reach its 52-week low.</li>\n</ul>\n<p>Here is a list of stocks that set new 52-week lows during the first half-hour of trading on Tuesday:</p>\n<ul>\n <li><b>TotalEnergies</b>(NYSE:TTE) shares set a new 52-week low of $40.33. The stock traded down 1.23%.</li>\n <li><b>DiDi Global</b>(NYSE:DIDI) stock set a new 52-week low of $10.69 on Tuesday, moving down 1.54%.</li>\n <li><b>China Life Insurance Co</b>(NYSE:LFC) shares set a new yearly low of $8.68 this morning. The stock was 0.0% (flat) on the session.</li>\n <li><b>Lufax Holding</b>(NYSE:LU) shares reached a new 52-week low of $8.50 on Tuesday morning, moving down 1.95%.</li>\n <li><b>Tencent Music Enter Gr</b>(NYSE:TME) stock drifted down 0.61% on Tuesday morning to hit a new 52-week low of $11.24.</li>\n <li><b>Autohome</b>(NYSE:ATHM) shares set a new yearly low of $57.65 this morning. The stock was down 3.11% on the session.</li>\n <li><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ABCL\">AbCellera Biologics</a></b>(NASDAQ:ABCL) shares moved down 3.38% on Tuesday to hit a new 52-week low of $15.80, drifting down 3.38%.</li>\n <li><b>Abcam</b>(NASDAQ:ABCM) stock hit $17.34 on Tuesday morning, setting a new 52-week low for a change of down 1.41%.</li>\n <li><b>Agora</b>(NASDAQ:API) shares moved down 5.09% on Tuesday to hit a new 52-week low of $32.59, drifting down 5.09%.</li>\n <li><b>OneConnect Financial Tech</b>(NYSE:OCFT) stock set a new 52-week low of $9.26 on Tuesday, moving down 0.84%.</li>\n <li><b>HUYA</b>(NYSE:HUYA) stock hit a yearly low of $13.80. The stock was down 2.15% for the day.</li>\n <li><b>SolarWinds</b>(NYSE:SWI) stock dropped to a yearly low on Tuesday of $9.80. Shares traded down 39.72%.</li>\n <li><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GOCO\">GoHealth</a></b>(NASDAQ:GOCO) stock broke to a new 52-week low of $9.27 on Tuesday. Shares of the company traded up 0.74%.</li>\n <li><b>Genius Sports</b>(NYSE:GENI) shares fell to $14.86 on Tuesday, setting a new 52-week low with a shift of down 0.92%.</li>\n <li><b>Gaotu Techedu</b>(NYSE:GOTU) stock set a new 52-week low of $9.86 on Tuesday, moving up 0.84%.</li>\n <li><b>MorphoSys</b>(NASDAQ:MOR) stock drifted down 1.77% on Tuesday morning to hit a new 52-week low of $16.04.</li>\n <li><b>Custom Truck One Source</b>(NYSE:CTOS) stock achieved a new 52-week low on Tuesday morning, hitting $7.92 and moving down 1.35%.</li>\n <li><b>Root</b>(NASDAQ:ROOT) stock achieved a new 52-week low on Tuesday morning, hitting $7.56 and moving down 3.39%.</li>\n <li><b>Outset Medical</b>(NASDAQ:OM) shares were up 0.36% for the day, having made a 52-week low of $40.98.</li>\n <li><b>Taboola.com</b>(NASDAQ:TBLA) stock dropped to a yearly low on Tuesday of $8.37. Shares traded up 1.05%.</li>\n <li><b>ATI Physical Therapy</b>(NYSE:ATIP) shares set a new yearly low of $7.72 this morning. The stock was up 0.19% on the session.</li>\n <li><b>Velodyne Lidar</b>(NASDAQ:VLDR) stock drifted down 5.48% on Tuesday morning to hit a new 52-week low of $8.03.</li>\n <li><b>GrubHub</b>(NASDAQ:GRUB) shares made a new 52-week low of $15.64 on Tuesday. The stock was down 3.8% for the day.</li>\n <li><b>DouYu International Hldgs</b>(NASDAQ:DOYU) stock hit a yearly low of $4.31. The stock was down 1.35% for the day.</li>\n <li><b>Singular Genomics Systems</b>(NASDAQ:OMIC) shares set a new yearly low of $18.35 this morning. The stock was down 4.72% on the session.</li>\n <li><b>Viant Technology</b>(NASDAQ:DSP) stock hit a yearly low of $16.37. The stock was down 3.22% for the day.</li>\n <li><b>Origin Materials</b>(NASDAQ:ORGN) shares reached a new 52-week low of $6.63 on Tuesday morning, moving down 0.37%.</li>\n <li><b>Meta Materials</b>(NASDAQ:MMAT) stock hit a yearly low of $3.23. The stock was down 4.88% for the day.</li>\n <li><b>Montauk Renewables</b>(NASDAQ:MNTK) shares hit a yearly low of $6.15. The stock was down 1.97% on the session.</li>\n <li><b>CareMax</b>(NASDAQ:CMAX) stock hit a yearly low of $10.25. The stock was up 0.05% for the day.</li>\n <li><b>HIVE Blockchain</b>(NASDAQ:HVBT) stock set a new 52-week low of $1.87 on Tuesday, moving down 4.54%.</li>\n <li><b>Pharming</b>(NASDAQ:PHAR) shares were down 0.15% for the day, having made a 52-week low of $10.80.</li>\n <li><b>AltC Acquisition</b>(NYSE:ALCC) shares reached a new 52-week low of $9.85 on Tuesday morning, moving up 0.09%.</li>\n <li><b>Convey Holding Parent</b>(NYSE:CNVY) stock achieved a new 52-week low on Tuesday morning, hitting $7.74 and moving down 1.02%.</li>\n <li><b>Bitfarms</b>(NASDAQ:BITF) stock dropped to a yearly low on Tuesday of $2.81. Shares traded down 3.93%.</li>\n <li><b>Nordic American Tankers</b>(NYSE:NAT) shares fell to $2.59 on Tuesday, setting a new 52-week low with a shift of up 1.15%.</li>\n <li><b>Orchard Therapeutics</b>(NASDAQ:ORTX) shares hit a yearly low of $3.20. The stock was 0.0% (flat) on the session.</li>\n <li><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CTMX\">CytomX</a> Therapeutics</b>(NASDAQ:CTMX) stock hit a new 52-week low of $5.63. The stock was 0.0% (flat) on the session.</li>\n <li><b>Alexco Resource</b>(AMEX:AXU) shares set a new yearly low of $1.99 this morning. The stock was up 1.99% on the session.</li>\n <li><b>Sera Prognostics</b>(NASDAQ:SERA) shares moved down 0.2% on Tuesday to hit a new 52-week low of $9.51, drifting down 0.2%.</li>\n <li><b>Dynamics Special Purpose</b>(NASDAQ:DYNS) shares moved down 0.2% on Tuesday to hit a new 52-week low of $9.76, drifting down 0.2%.</li>\n <li><b>Golden Star Resources</b>(AMEX:GSS) stock set a new 52-week low of $2.20 on Tuesday, moving 0.0% (flat).</li>\n <li><b>AGM Gr Hldgs</b>(NASDAQ:AGMH) stock set a new 52-week low of $8.60 on Tuesday, moving down 4.72%.</li>\n <li><b>Freeline Therapeutics</b>(NASDAQ:FRLN) shares reached a new 52-week low of $6.07 on Tuesday morning, moving down 5.97%.</li>\n <li><b>Ensysce Biosciences</b>(NASDAQ:ENSC) stock achieved a new 52-week low on Tuesday morning, hitting $8.80 and moving down 6.84%.</li>\n <li><b>4d pharma</b>(NASDAQ:LBPS) shares moved down 1.47% on Tuesday to hit a new 52-week low of $9.36, drifting down 1.47%.</li>\n <li><b>Diginex</b>(NASDAQ:EQOS) stock broke to a new 52-week low of $4.89 on Tuesday. Shares of the company traded down 2.38%.</li>\n <li><b>Ardelyx</b>(NASDAQ:ARDX) shares were down 75.24% for the day, having made a 52-week low of $1.83.</li>\n <li><b>ARYA Sciences Acquisition</b>(NASDAQ:ARYE) stock drifted down 0.7% on Tuesday morning to hit a new 52-week low of $9.96.</li>\n <li><b>Pop Culture Gr</b>(NASDAQ:CPOP) stock drifted down 1.61% on Tuesday morning to hit a new 52-week low of $6.57.</li>\n <li><b>First Capital</b>(NASDAQ:FCAP) shares moved up 2.32% on Tuesday to hit a new 52-week low of $42.55, drifting up 2.32%.</li>\n <li><b>Medicenna Therapeutics</b>(NASDAQ:MDNA) stock broke to a new 52-week low of $2.45 on Tuesday. Shares of the company traded down 2.77%.</li>\n <li><b>Sunlands Technology</b>(NYSE:STG) stock achieved a new 52-week low on Tuesday morning, hitting $0.76 and moving down 4.31%.</li>\n <li><b>Bridgford Foods</b>(NASDAQ:BRID) shares made a new 52-week low of $13.00 on Tuesday. The stock was down 0.31% for the day.</li>\n <li><b>Liminal Biosciences</b>(NASDAQ:LMNL) stock set a new 52-week low of $3.27 on Tuesday, moving up 0.19%.</li>\n <li><b>Intrusion</b>(NASDAQ:INTZ) stock hit a yearly low of $4.32. The stock was down 47.29% for the day.</li>\n <li><b>Jiuzi Holdings</b>(NASDAQ:JZXN) shares set a new 52-week low of $3.51. The stock traded down 5.41%.</li>\n <li><b>Versus Systems</b>(NASDAQ:VS) shares set a new 52-week low of $4.52. The stock traded down 0.62%.</li>\n <li><b>Tian Ruixiang Holdings</b>(NASDAQ:TIRX) stock set a new 52-week low of $4.56 on Tuesday, moving up 0.15%.</li>\n <li><b>ECMOHO</b>(NASDAQ:MOHO) shares fell to $1.25 on Tuesday, setting a new 52-week low with a shift of down 5.04%.</li>\n <li><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CEMI\">Chembio Diagnostics</a></b>(NASDAQ:CEMI) shares made a new 52-week low of $2.20 on Tuesday. The stock was down 7.52% for the day.</li>\n <li><b>DallasNews</b>(NASDAQ:DALN) shares reached a new 52-week low of $6.39 on Tuesday morning, moving up 0.2%.</li>\n <li><b>BiondVax Pharmaceuticals</b>(NASDAQ:BVXV) shares moved down 2.4% on Tuesday to hit a new 52-week low of $2.28, drifting down 2.4%.</li>\n <li><b>Sonoma Pharmaceuticals</b>(NASDAQ:SNOA) stock broke to a new 52-week low of $5.36 on Tuesday. Shares of the company traded down 4.72%.</li>\n</ul>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1177437175","content_text":"Before 10 a.m. ET Tuesday, 64 stocks made new 52-week lows.\nKey Facts:\n\nTotalEnergies(NYSE:TTE) was the largest, in terms of market cap, to set a new 52-week low.\nThe company with the smallest market cap to set a new 52-week low wasSonoma Pharmaceuticals(NASDAQ:SNOA).\nArdelyx(NASDAQ:ARDX) made the largest move down on the session, with shares plummeting 75.24% to reach its 52-week low.\n\nHere is a list of stocks that set new 52-week lows during the first half-hour of trading on Tuesday:\n\nTotalEnergies(NYSE:TTE) shares set a new 52-week low of $40.33. The stock traded down 1.23%.\nDiDi Global(NYSE:DIDI) stock set a new 52-week low of $10.69 on Tuesday, moving down 1.54%.\nChina Life Insurance Co(NYSE:LFC) shares set a new yearly low of $8.68 this morning. The stock was 0.0% (flat) on the session.\nLufax Holding(NYSE:LU) shares reached a new 52-week low of $8.50 on Tuesday morning, moving down 1.95%.\nTencent Music Enter Gr(NYSE:TME) stock drifted down 0.61% on Tuesday morning to hit a new 52-week low of $11.24.\nAutohome(NYSE:ATHM) shares set a new yearly low of $57.65 this morning. The stock was down 3.11% on the session.\nAbCellera Biologics(NASDAQ:ABCL) shares moved down 3.38% on Tuesday to hit a new 52-week low of $15.80, drifting down 3.38%.\nAbcam(NASDAQ:ABCM) stock hit $17.34 on Tuesday morning, setting a new 52-week low for a change of down 1.41%.\nAgora(NASDAQ:API) shares moved down 5.09% on Tuesday to hit a new 52-week low of $32.59, drifting down 5.09%.\nOneConnect Financial Tech(NYSE:OCFT) stock set a new 52-week low of $9.26 on Tuesday, moving down 0.84%.\nHUYA(NYSE:HUYA) stock hit a yearly low of $13.80. The stock was down 2.15% for the day.\nSolarWinds(NYSE:SWI) stock dropped to a yearly low on Tuesday of $9.80. Shares traded down 39.72%.\nGoHealth(NASDAQ:GOCO) stock broke to a new 52-week low of $9.27 on Tuesday. Shares of the company traded up 0.74%.\nGenius Sports(NYSE:GENI) shares fell to $14.86 on Tuesday, setting a new 52-week low with a shift of down 0.92%.\nGaotu Techedu(NYSE:GOTU) stock set a new 52-week low of $9.86 on Tuesday, moving up 0.84%.\nMorphoSys(NASDAQ:MOR) stock drifted down 1.77% on Tuesday morning to hit a new 52-week low of $16.04.\nCustom Truck One Source(NYSE:CTOS) stock achieved a new 52-week low on Tuesday morning, hitting $7.92 and moving down 1.35%.\nRoot(NASDAQ:ROOT) stock achieved a new 52-week low on Tuesday morning, hitting $7.56 and moving down 3.39%.\nOutset Medical(NASDAQ:OM) shares were up 0.36% for the day, having made a 52-week low of $40.98.\nTaboola.com(NASDAQ:TBLA) stock dropped to a yearly low on Tuesday of $8.37. Shares traded up 1.05%.\nATI Physical Therapy(NYSE:ATIP) shares set a new yearly low of $7.72 this morning. The stock was up 0.19% on the session.\nVelodyne Lidar(NASDAQ:VLDR) stock drifted down 5.48% on Tuesday morning to hit a new 52-week low of $8.03.\nGrubHub(NASDAQ:GRUB) shares made a new 52-week low of $15.64 on Tuesday. The stock was down 3.8% for the day.\nDouYu International Hldgs(NASDAQ:DOYU) stock hit a yearly low of $4.31. The stock was down 1.35% for the day.\nSingular Genomics Systems(NASDAQ:OMIC) shares set a new yearly low of $18.35 this morning. The stock was down 4.72% on the session.\nViant Technology(NASDAQ:DSP) stock hit a yearly low of $16.37. The stock was down 3.22% for the day.\nOrigin Materials(NASDAQ:ORGN) shares reached a new 52-week low of $6.63 on Tuesday morning, moving down 0.37%.\nMeta Materials(NASDAQ:MMAT) stock hit a yearly low of $3.23. The stock was down 4.88% for the day.\nMontauk Renewables(NASDAQ:MNTK) shares hit a yearly low of $6.15. The stock was down 1.97% on the session.\nCareMax(NASDAQ:CMAX) stock hit a yearly low of $10.25. The stock was up 0.05% for the day.\nHIVE Blockchain(NASDAQ:HVBT) stock set a new 52-week low of $1.87 on Tuesday, moving down 4.54%.\nPharming(NASDAQ:PHAR) shares were down 0.15% for the day, having made a 52-week low of $10.80.\nAltC Acquisition(NYSE:ALCC) shares reached a new 52-week low of $9.85 on Tuesday morning, moving up 0.09%.\nConvey Holding Parent(NYSE:CNVY) stock achieved a new 52-week low on Tuesday morning, hitting $7.74 and moving down 1.02%.\nBitfarms(NASDAQ:BITF) stock dropped to a yearly low on Tuesday of $2.81. Shares traded down 3.93%.\nNordic American Tankers(NYSE:NAT) shares fell to $2.59 on Tuesday, setting a new 52-week low with a shift of up 1.15%.\nOrchard Therapeutics(NASDAQ:ORTX) shares hit a yearly low of $3.20. The stock was 0.0% (flat) on the session.\nCytomX Therapeutics(NASDAQ:CTMX) stock hit a new 52-week low of $5.63. The stock was 0.0% (flat) on the session.\nAlexco Resource(AMEX:AXU) shares set a new yearly low of $1.99 this morning. The stock was up 1.99% on the session.\nSera Prognostics(NASDAQ:SERA) shares moved down 0.2% on Tuesday to hit a new 52-week low of $9.51, drifting down 0.2%.\nDynamics Special Purpose(NASDAQ:DYNS) shares moved down 0.2% on Tuesday to hit a new 52-week low of $9.76, drifting down 0.2%.\nGolden Star Resources(AMEX:GSS) stock set a new 52-week low of $2.20 on Tuesday, moving 0.0% (flat).\nAGM Gr Hldgs(NASDAQ:AGMH) stock set a new 52-week low of $8.60 on Tuesday, moving down 4.72%.\nFreeline Therapeutics(NASDAQ:FRLN) shares reached a new 52-week low of $6.07 on Tuesday morning, moving down 5.97%.\nEnsysce Biosciences(NASDAQ:ENSC) stock achieved a new 52-week low on Tuesday morning, hitting $8.80 and moving down 6.84%.\n4d pharma(NASDAQ:LBPS) shares moved down 1.47% on Tuesday to hit a new 52-week low of $9.36, drifting down 1.47%.\nDiginex(NASDAQ:EQOS) stock broke to a new 52-week low of $4.89 on Tuesday. Shares of the company traded down 2.38%.\nArdelyx(NASDAQ:ARDX) shares were down 75.24% for the day, having made a 52-week low of $1.83.\nARYA Sciences Acquisition(NASDAQ:ARYE) stock drifted down 0.7% on Tuesday morning to hit a new 52-week low of $9.96.\nPop Culture Gr(NASDAQ:CPOP) stock drifted down 1.61% on Tuesday morning to hit a new 52-week low of $6.57.\nFirst Capital(NASDAQ:FCAP) shares moved up 2.32% on Tuesday to hit a new 52-week low of $42.55, drifting up 2.32%.\nMedicenna Therapeutics(NASDAQ:MDNA) stock broke to a new 52-week low of $2.45 on Tuesday. Shares of the company traded down 2.77%.\nSunlands Technology(NYSE:STG) stock achieved a new 52-week low on Tuesday morning, hitting $0.76 and moving down 4.31%.\nBridgford Foods(NASDAQ:BRID) shares made a new 52-week low of $13.00 on Tuesday. The stock was down 0.31% for the day.\nLiminal Biosciences(NASDAQ:LMNL) stock set a new 52-week low of $3.27 on Tuesday, moving up 0.19%.\nIntrusion(NASDAQ:INTZ) stock hit a yearly low of $4.32. The stock was down 47.29% for the day.\nJiuzi Holdings(NASDAQ:JZXN) shares set a new 52-week low of $3.51. The stock traded down 5.41%.\nVersus Systems(NASDAQ:VS) shares set a new 52-week low of $4.52. The stock traded down 0.62%.\nTian Ruixiang Holdings(NASDAQ:TIRX) stock set a new 52-week low of $4.56 on Tuesday, moving up 0.15%.\nECMOHO(NASDAQ:MOHO) shares fell to $1.25 on Tuesday, setting a new 52-week low with a shift of down 5.04%.\nChembio Diagnostics(NASDAQ:CEMI) shares made a new 52-week low of $2.20 on Tuesday. The stock was down 7.52% for the day.\nDallasNews(NASDAQ:DALN) shares reached a new 52-week low of $6.39 on Tuesday morning, moving up 0.2%.\nBiondVax Pharmaceuticals(NASDAQ:BVXV) shares moved down 2.4% on Tuesday to hit a new 52-week low of $2.28, drifting down 2.4%.\nSonoma Pharmaceuticals(NASDAQ:SNOA) stock broke to a new 52-week low of $5.36 on Tuesday. Shares of the company traded down 4.72%.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":672,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":174936515,"gmtCreate":1627056553437,"gmtModify":1703483582213,"author":{"id":"3574834972684297","authorId":"3574834972684297","name":"Joanteo","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574834972684297","authorIdStr":"3574834972684297"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/174936515","repostId":"2153983997","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":692,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":173100842,"gmtCreate":1626624546886,"gmtModify":1703762438821,"author":{"id":"3574834972684297","authorId":"3574834972684297","name":"Joanteo","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574834972684297","authorIdStr":"3574834972684297"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/173100842","repostId":"1139907709","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1139907709","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1626568617,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1139907709?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-18 08:36","market":"hk","language":"en","title":"Wall Street Crime And Punishment: Thomas F. Quinn's Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1139907709","media":"Benzinga","summary":"Does crime pay?\nIn August 1988, French authorities arrested an American expatriate named Thomas F. Q","content":"<div>\n<p>Does crime pay?\nIn August 1988, French authorities arrested an American expatriate named Thomas F. Quinn for orchestrating a global securities scheme that defrauded investors out of $500 million.\nAs ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.benzinga.com/government/21/07/21990476/wall-street-crime-and-punishment-thomas-f-quinns-mad-mad-mad-mad-world\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"lsy1606299360108","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Wall Street Crime And Punishment: Thomas F. Quinn's Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWall Street Crime And Punishment: Thomas F. Quinn's Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-18 08:36 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.benzinga.com/government/21/07/21990476/wall-street-crime-and-punishment-thomas-f-quinns-mad-mad-mad-mad-world><strong>Benzinga</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Does crime pay?\nIn August 1988, French authorities arrested an American expatriate named Thomas F. Quinn for orchestrating a global securities scheme that defrauded investors out of $500 million.\nAs ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.benzinga.com/government/21/07/21990476/wall-street-crime-and-punishment-thomas-f-quinns-mad-mad-mad-mad-world\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.benzinga.com/government/21/07/21990476/wall-street-crime-and-punishment-thomas-f-quinns-mad-mad-mad-mad-world","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1139907709","content_text":"Does crime pay?\nIn August 1988, French authorities arrested an American expatriate named Thomas F. Quinn for orchestrating a global securities scheme that defrauded investors out of $500 million.\nAs an unapologetic financial miscreant with a lifelong penchant for fraud, the French escapade represented something of a career peak for Quinn, whose flair of swindling took on an astonishing level of organizing that left no corner of the world untouched.\nIllusory Assets For Sale:Thomas Francis Quinn was born in Brooklyn in 1932; his father drove a cement truck and his mother was a housewife who made extra money selling clothing and jewelry from the family’s garage.\nQuinn was an altar boy in his childhood and was the first member of his family to pursue higher education, graduating from St. John’s University Law School and passing the bar in 1962.\nQuinn opted to go into business for himself, starting a brokerage firm in New York called Thomas, Williams & Lee.The main focus of this firm became the promotion of Kent Industries,a company that claimed to own Florida property valued at $2 million.\nThere was a slight problem — Kent Industries didn’t own anything in the Sunshine State, and this inconvenient fact helped to introduce Quinn to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).\nLong story short: Quinn received a lifetime banishment from the SEC in 1966 from doing business with brokers and dealers thanks to what the agency defined as his “flagrant fraudulent practices” related to the Kent Industries assets, which the regulator considered to be “almost completely illusory.”\nThe U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) was a bit slower in dealing with Quinn, but by 1970 he was sent to jail for six months and was later permanently disbarred from practicing law.\nA Job With The Mob:Prior to losing his law license, Quinn gained a partnership in a New York-based securities law firm that set off several alarms among federal law enforcement agencies. Indeed, an FBI report from 1983 recalled this firm’s chief focus was being responsible for the “funds of hoodlum-controlled companies.”\nQuinn was on both the FBI’s and SEC’s respective radars in the early 1980s for his role with two companies,Sundance Gold Mining and Aquarius Gold Exploration, that claimed to have discovered gold in Suriname. The companies created a flurry of excitement among investors, but an investigation into their operations found a hitherto undeclared connection with the Genovese crime family.\nThe SEC filed a civil complaint against Quinn in 1983, charging him with fraudulently manipulating and promoting the companies’ stocks.\nThree years later, he reached a settlement with the regulator by agreeing to permanently stay away from anything related to securities.\nThe FBI, despite finding Mafia fingerprints in Quinn’s business affairs, declined to press charges against him.\nRealizing that he wore out his welcome in his home country, Quinn and his common-law wife Rochelle Rothfleisch decided to relocate to France and to up his game to an unprecedented operation.\nBoiler Room Follies:The circumstances and details of how Quinn built his swindling masterpiece are a bit fuzzy, but it is believed that the scheme was first hatched in 1984 and was coordinated out of his $6 million villa in the south of France.\nQuinn set up an archipelago of offices in several European countries and in Dubai, Jamaica and the tiny South Pacific island nation of Vanuatu, and he gave them phony names that sounded similar to respectable brokerages.\nEach office was staffed with salesmen who were tasked to sell stocks for 20 U.S. corporations to individual investors around the world. The stocks in question were mostly shell companies trading on the over-the-counter exchanges that Quinn picked up for pennies, but they were resold by Quinn’s salesmen at inflated amounts.\nThe investors were culled from mailing lists sold by publishing companies and professional organizations, as well as from respondents to advertisements placed in newsletters focused on the over-the-counter markets.\nQuinn’s henchmen would telephone the investors — nearly all of whom were novices to investing — and do a high-pressure sales spiel that, more often than not, resulted in the separation of the gullible targets from their money.\nQuinn’s team aimed at European, Australian, Middle Eastern and Hong Kong neophyte investors. The only country off-limits from this scheme was the U.S. Quinn was already on the FBI’s radar and the last thing he wanted was to give them cause to pursue him anew.\nA Temporary Setback: In 1988, Quinn’s arrest in France saw him charged with securities fraud, forgery of administrative documents and the possession of two fake Greek passports. His detention and the subsequent arrest of 20 of his salesmen created a fascinating dilemma for banking and law enforcement agencies in multiple countries.\nFor starters, no one could easily figure out where the majority of Quinn’s $500 million in ill-gotten gains wound up. Transfers were traced through banks in Switzerland, Luxembourg and Gibraltar, as well as the beleaguered Bank of Credit and Commerce International in Tampa, Florida, which gained national attention as a favored depository for those involved in drug money laundering. But where the money eventually landed was anyone’s guess, and Quinn’s talent for adopting aliases to cover his business tracks confounded investigators.\nAlso, it was unclear regarding how many people were swindled. A pair of class-action lawsuits brought out a total of 500 people trying to regain their money, but some observers of this case speculated the number could have been higher — some investors might have seen Quinn’s scam as a means of evading local taxes and foreign currency exchanges and would then have to answer to their authorities if this chicanery came to light.\nThe SEC got into the picture because the stocks being sold in the scheme were all U.S. companies. The agency hosted a meeting in Washington D.C. with law enforcement officers and prosecutors from eight European countries and Australia, with the hopes of sorting out the mess. But since no Americans were defrauded in this elaborate charade, Quinn did not face criminal charges in his own country, although the SEC temporarily froze his U.S. assets.\nIn France, Quinn was initially released after agreeing to reimburse his French victims but was arrested again when the Swiss government demanded his extradition.\nHe came to trial in 1991 and was only sentenced to four years in prison, but his sentence was reduced to include time served and he was extradited to Switzerland.\nHis Alpine detention was brief and by the mid-1990s he returned to the U.S. and rented a luxury home in Greenwich, Connecticut, a swanky suburb of New York City.\nAn Eventual Stumble:One of Quinn’s neighbors in Greenwich wasMartin Frankel,a financier with his own addiction to swindling.\nIn 1999, the Wall Street Journal used anonymous “people familiar with the matter” to claim Quinn assisted Frankel in his efforts to raise money for a controlled investment fund designed to buy insurance companies — but this turned out to be an embezzlement scam that resulted in Frankel fleeing the U.S. to Germany on a phony passport.\nFrankel was eventually extradited and spent nearly two decades in prison, but Quinn was never charged for being a partner in Frankel’s shenanigans.\nFor most of the 1990s and the 2000s, Quinn kept a very low public profile, although law enforcement tracked his travels to such far-flung places as the Maldives and the United Arab Emirates.\nIn 2004, he made a rare appearance at the Irish Derby as the co-owner of the winning thoroughbred Grey Swallow. Photographs of Quinn with the winning racehorse marked the only time that he was ever photographed in a public gathering. (Copyright restrictions prevent us from reprinting the photograph here, butthis linkon the RTE website shows Quinn, standing second from right, at the conclusion of the championship race.)\nIn November 2009, Quinn’s luck finally ran out. On a trip back from Ireland to New York’s JFK International Airport, he was arrested for his role within a ring of embezzlers that sought to defraud a pair of British telecommunications companies out of more than $60 million. The scheme had the global hallmarks of Quinn’s earlier criminal triumph, with funds being disbursed to seven countries across four continents.\nQuinn was immediately jailed upon his arrest and was denied bail because it was feared he would attempt to flee the country. He eventually pleaded guilty to a single count of wire fraud and, despite exhortations to avoid prison due to health problems, he was sentenced in March 2013 to 84 months in prison. He was released in May 2016.\nWhat became of Quinn since his release is unknown. No obituary for him has been published, and he would be 89 years old if he is still alive.\nOne information-tracking website listed him residing at a Brooklyn address, but the website also listed an accompanying telephone number that is not in service. Any readers who may have information on Quinn’s whereabouts should contact us and we will offer an update on his story.\nQuinn rarely spoke to anyone about his criminal activities. During an investigative session after his final arrest, he reportedly would only answer questions through a series of eyelid blinks. When a reporter sought to interview him in 1995, he demanded his privacy.\n\"Just forget me,\" Quinn said. \"I've got a lot of trouble and a lot of personal grief. I'm just trying to get on with my life. I'm not in the securities business and never will be again.\"","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":637,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":801167553,"gmtCreate":1627488711972,"gmtModify":1703491063434,"author":{"id":"3574834972684297","authorId":"3574834972684297","name":"Joanteo","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574834972684297","authorIdStr":"3574834972684297"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Wow","listText":"Wow","text":"Wow","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/801167553","repostId":"2154721924","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2154721924","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1627486574,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2154721924?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-28 23:36","market":"hk","language":"en","title":"Why AMD's Stock Is Trading Higher Today","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2154721924","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"AMD is trading higher Wednesday morning after the company late Tuesday announced better-than-expecte","content":"<p>AMD is trading higher Wednesday morning after the company late Tuesday announced better-than-expected second-quarter financial results and issued third-quarter guidance above estimates.</p>\n<p>AMD reported quarterly earnings of 63 cents per share, which beat the estimate of 54 cents per share. The company reported quarterly revenue of $3.85 billion, which beat the estimate of $3.62 billion. AMD said it expects third-quarter revenue to be in a range of $4 billion to $4.2 billion, which was&nbsp;higher than the estimate of $3.82 billion.</p>\n<p>\"Our business performed exceptionally well in the second quarter as revenue and operating margin doubled and profitability more than tripled year-over-year,” said Lisa Su,&nbsp;president and CEO of AMD.</p>\n<p><b>Analyst Assessment:</b>&nbsp;Rosenblatt analyst Hans Mosesmann maintained&nbsp;AMD&nbsp;with a Buy rating and raised&nbsp;the price target from&nbsp;$135&nbsp;to&nbsp;$150.</p>\n<p>Susquehanna analyst Christopher Rolland maintained&nbsp;AMD&nbsp;with a Positive rating and raised&nbsp;the price target from&nbsp;$125&nbsp;to&nbsp;$130.</p>\n<p><b>Price Action: </b>AMD has traded as high as $99.23 and as low as $67.02 over a 52-week period.</p>\n<p>At last check Wednesday, the stock was up 5% at $95.6.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a0dd3dd7be87bfa480b05a3c26ee3f62\" tg-width=\"840\" tg-height=\"470\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why AMD's Stock Is Trading Higher Today</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy AMD's Stock Is Trading Higher Today\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-07-28 23:36</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>AMD is trading higher Wednesday morning after the company late Tuesday announced better-than-expected second-quarter financial results and issued third-quarter guidance above estimates.</p>\n<p>AMD reported quarterly earnings of 63 cents per share, which beat the estimate of 54 cents per share. The company reported quarterly revenue of $3.85 billion, which beat the estimate of $3.62 billion. AMD said it expects third-quarter revenue to be in a range of $4 billion to $4.2 billion, which was&nbsp;higher than the estimate of $3.82 billion.</p>\n<p>\"Our business performed exceptionally well in the second quarter as revenue and operating margin doubled and profitability more than tripled year-over-year,” said Lisa Su,&nbsp;president and CEO of AMD.</p>\n<p><b>Analyst Assessment:</b>&nbsp;Rosenblatt analyst Hans Mosesmann maintained&nbsp;AMD&nbsp;with a Buy rating and raised&nbsp;the price target from&nbsp;$135&nbsp;to&nbsp;$150.</p>\n<p>Susquehanna analyst Christopher Rolland maintained&nbsp;AMD&nbsp;with a Positive rating and raised&nbsp;the price target from&nbsp;$125&nbsp;to&nbsp;$130.</p>\n<p><b>Price Action: </b>AMD has traded as high as $99.23 and as low as $67.02 over a 52-week period.</p>\n<p>At last check Wednesday, the stock was up 5% at $95.6.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a0dd3dd7be87bfa480b05a3c26ee3f62\" tg-width=\"840\" tg-height=\"470\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AMD":"美国超微公司"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2154721924","content_text":"AMD is trading higher Wednesday morning after the company late Tuesday announced better-than-expected second-quarter financial results and issued third-quarter guidance above estimates.\nAMD reported quarterly earnings of 63 cents per share, which beat the estimate of 54 cents per share. The company reported quarterly revenue of $3.85 billion, which beat the estimate of $3.62 billion. AMD said it expects third-quarter revenue to be in a range of $4 billion to $4.2 billion, which was higher than the estimate of $3.82 billion.\n\"Our business performed exceptionally well in the second quarter as revenue and operating margin doubled and profitability more than tripled year-over-year,” said Lisa Su, president and CEO of AMD.\nAnalyst Assessment: Rosenblatt analyst Hans Mosesmann maintained AMD with a Buy rating and raised the price target from $135 to $150.\nSusquehanna analyst Christopher Rolland maintained AMD with a Positive rating and raised the price target from $125 to $130.\nPrice Action: AMD has traded as high as $99.23 and as low as $67.02 over a 52-week period.\nAt last check Wednesday, the stock was up 5% at $95.6.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"AMD":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2515,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":809962960,"gmtCreate":1627344564750,"gmtModify":1703487912654,"author":{"id":"3574834972684297","authorId":"3574834972684297","name":"Joanteo","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574834972684297","authorIdStr":"3574834972684297"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/809962960","repostId":"1153028059","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1153028059","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1627340900,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1153028059?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-27 07:08","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Tesla sales surge 98%; company boosts margins on its less-costly electric cars","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1153028059","media":"Reuters","summary":" -Tesla Inc posted a bigger second-quarter profit than expected on Tuesday thanks to sharply higher sales of its less-expensive electric vehicles, as it raised prices to boost its margins on them.Tesla also cut costs which helped it offset many of the supply chain and microchip shortfalls facing the auto industry.For the first time since late 2019, Tesla profits did not rely on sales of environmental credits to other automakers, a sign of increasing financial health for the manufacturing operati","content":"<p>(Reuters) -Tesla Inc posted a bigger second-quarter profit than expected on Tuesday thanks to sharply higher sales of its less-expensive electric vehicles, as it raised prices to boost its margins on them.</p>\n<p>Tesla also cut costs which helped it offset many of the supply chain and microchip shortfalls facing the auto industry.</p>\n<p>For the first time since late 2019, Tesla profits did not rely on sales of environmental credits to other automakers, a sign of increasing financial health for the manufacturing operation. Tesla boosted its performance by cutting features it said were unused or unneeded and raising U.S. vehicle prices.</p>\n<p>Shares of the world’s most valuable automaker rose 1.5% in extended trade.</p>\n<p>In a call with investors and analysts, Tesla executives said that volume production growth will depend on parts availability, and Musk cautioned the shortage of semiconductors will continue.</p>\n<p>“The global chip shortage situation remains quite serious,” Musk said.</p>\n<p>Still, Musk said Tesla expects to launch production this year of the Model Y SUV at factories under construction in Texas and Germany. He said the company expects battery cell suppliers to double production next year.</p>\n<p>Despite the pandemic and the supply chain crisis, Tesla posted record deliveries during the quarter, thanks to sales of cheaper models including Model 3 sedans and Model Ys.</p>\n<p>The carmaker, led by billionaire entrepreneur Elon Musk, said revenue jumped to $11.96 billion from $6.04 billion a year earlier, when its California factory was shut down for more than six weeks due to local lockdown orders to fight the pandemic.</p>\n<p>Analysts had expected revenue of about $11.3 billion, according to IBES data from Refinitiv.</p>\n<p>Excluding items, Tesla posted a profit of $1.45 per share, easily topping analyst expectations for a profit of 98 cents per share.</p>\n<p>Tesla said operating income rose with volume growth and cost reduction, which offset higher supply chain costs, lower regulatory credit revenue and other items including $23 million in losses on investment in cryptocurrency bitcoin.</p>\n<p>Tesla’s profitability has often relied on selling regulatory credits to other automakers, but in the second quarter, Tesla was profitable without these credits for the first time since the end of 2019. Its GAAP net income was $1.14 billion in the second quarter. Revenue from the credits only totaled $354 million.</p>\n<p>“Tesla impressed with its numbers, as most of its revenue came from vehicle sales,” Jesse Cohen, senior analyst at Investing.com, said.</p>\n<p>Carmaker Stellantis expects to achieve its European carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions targets this year without environmental credits bought from Tesla.</p>\n<p>Tesla said it said it has delayed the launch of the Semi truck program to 2022 to focus on starting factories and due to limited availability of battery cells and other parts this year.</p>\n<p>But the company’s new 4680 batteries are not ready for volume production; executives said it was difficult to predict when technological challenges would be resolved.</p>\n<p>In an aside, Musk said he “most likely will not be on earnings calls” going forward to discuss financial results with investors and analysts. These calls have been a colorful quarterly ritual Musk has used for discourses on Tesla technology, or to fire back at rivals or critics.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Tesla sales surge 98%; company boosts margins on its less-costly electric cars</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTesla sales surge 98%; company boosts margins on its less-costly electric cars\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-27 07:08 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.reuters.com/article/tesla-results/update-4-tesla-sales-surge-98-company-boosts-margins-on-its-less-costly-electric-cars-idUSL4N2P23I5><strong>Reuters</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>(Reuters) -Tesla Inc posted a bigger second-quarter profit than expected on Tuesday thanks to sharply higher sales of its less-expensive electric vehicles, as it raised prices to boost its margins on ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.reuters.com/article/tesla-results/update-4-tesla-sales-surge-98-company-boosts-margins-on-its-less-costly-electric-cars-idUSL4N2P23I5\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"https://www.reuters.com/article/tesla-results/update-4-tesla-sales-surge-98-company-boosts-margins-on-its-less-costly-electric-cars-idUSL4N2P23I5","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1153028059","content_text":"(Reuters) -Tesla Inc posted a bigger second-quarter profit than expected on Tuesday thanks to sharply higher sales of its less-expensive electric vehicles, as it raised prices to boost its margins on them.\nTesla also cut costs which helped it offset many of the supply chain and microchip shortfalls facing the auto industry.\nFor the first time since late 2019, Tesla profits did not rely on sales of environmental credits to other automakers, a sign of increasing financial health for the manufacturing operation. Tesla boosted its performance by cutting features it said were unused or unneeded and raising U.S. vehicle prices.\nShares of the world’s most valuable automaker rose 1.5% in extended trade.\nIn a call with investors and analysts, Tesla executives said that volume production growth will depend on parts availability, and Musk cautioned the shortage of semiconductors will continue.\n“The global chip shortage situation remains quite serious,” Musk said.\nStill, Musk said Tesla expects to launch production this year of the Model Y SUV at factories under construction in Texas and Germany. He said the company expects battery cell suppliers to double production next year.\nDespite the pandemic and the supply chain crisis, Tesla posted record deliveries during the quarter, thanks to sales of cheaper models including Model 3 sedans and Model Ys.\nThe carmaker, led by billionaire entrepreneur Elon Musk, said revenue jumped to $11.96 billion from $6.04 billion a year earlier, when its California factory was shut down for more than six weeks due to local lockdown orders to fight the pandemic.\nAnalysts had expected revenue of about $11.3 billion, according to IBES data from Refinitiv.\nExcluding items, Tesla posted a profit of $1.45 per share, easily topping analyst expectations for a profit of 98 cents per share.\nTesla said operating income rose with volume growth and cost reduction, which offset higher supply chain costs, lower regulatory credit revenue and other items including $23 million in losses on investment in cryptocurrency bitcoin.\nTesla’s profitability has often relied on selling regulatory credits to other automakers, but in the second quarter, Tesla was profitable without these credits for the first time since the end of 2019. Its GAAP net income was $1.14 billion in the second quarter. Revenue from the credits only totaled $354 million.\n“Tesla impressed with its numbers, as most of its revenue came from vehicle sales,” Jesse Cohen, senior analyst at Investing.com, said.\nCarmaker Stellantis expects to achieve its European carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions targets this year without environmental credits bought from Tesla.\nTesla said it said it has delayed the launch of the Semi truck program to 2022 to focus on starting factories and due to limited availability of battery cells and other parts this year.\nBut the company’s new 4680 batteries are not ready for volume production; executives said it was difficult to predict when technological challenges would be resolved.\nIn an aside, Musk said he “most likely will not be on earnings calls” going forward to discuss financial results with investors and analysts. These calls have been a colorful quarterly ritual Musk has used for discourses on Tesla technology, or to fire back at rivals or critics.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"TSLA":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":852,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":170261731,"gmtCreate":1626436807623,"gmtModify":1703760121722,"author":{"id":"3574834972684297","authorId":"3574834972684297","name":"Joanteo","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574834972684297","authorIdStr":"3574834972684297"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/170261731","repostId":"1141989621","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":508,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":802887478,"gmtCreate":1627752665994,"gmtModify":1703495473018,"author":{"id":"3574834972684297","authorId":"3574834972684297","name":"Joanteo","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574834972684297","authorIdStr":"3574834972684297"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/802887478","repostId":"1154216466","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1154216466","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1627713678,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1154216466?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-31 14:41","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Antitrust Activists Want to Go Full Throttle. Here’s a Lesson They Should Consider First","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1154216466","media":"Barron's","summary":"About the author: Thomas W. Hazlett is H.H. Macaulay endowed professor of economics at Clemson Unive","content":"<p><i>About the author: Thomas W. Hazlett is H.H. Macaulay endowed professor of economics at Clemson University, and previously served as chief economist of the Federal Communications Commission.&nbsp;His latest book is</i>The Political Spectrum: The Tumultuous Liberation of Wireless Technologies, from Herbert Hoover to the Smartphone.</p>\n<p>Big Tech is in the antitrust hot seat. But before the Department of Justice tries to break up companies likeGoogleorApple,it should recall the history, and eventual outcome, of theAT&amp;T-Time Warner merger.</p>\n<p>The DOJ expended extensive time and resources to stop AT&amp;T’s acquisition of Time Warner, marking the department’s first challenge to a major vertical merger in over 40 years. The government was unsuccessful despite its best efforts, which included an appeal to the D.C. Circuit, and time reveals that its concerns were evidently misplaced all along. The merger did not result in higher prices, program blackouts, or even any appreciable advantage for the companies.</p>\n<p>In October 2016 AT&amp;Tannouncedits plan to buy Time Warner.&nbsp; Donald Trump’s presidential campaign trashed the merger in a statement: &nbsp;“AT&amp;T … is now trying to buy Time Warner and thus the wildly anti-Trump CNN. Donald Trump would never approve such a deal.”&nbsp; With Trump in office, the DOJ moved to block it.</p>\n<p>In 2017, the DOJ went to court tocomplainthat the merger would “substantially lessen competition in video” by allowing AT&amp;T to “use Time Warner’s ‘must have’” networks like CNN, TNT, TBS, and HBO to raise fees charged to rival cable TV distributors like Comcast or DISH. AT&amp;T, which had acquired national satellite operator DirecTV, could threaten “blackouts” depriving rival distributors of key programs—their subscribers would then quit and flock to DirecTV (AT&amp;T) so as to keep watching CNN or the NBA Playoffs on TNT. Not only would major TV and cable systems be hurt, but emerging online streaming services would be crushed.</p>\n<p>The government’s case focused on “vertical leveraging,” where a company uses two complementary products to make it more difficult for rivals to compete in the individual markets.&nbsp;Here, AT&amp;T was combining video content creation with video program distribution; the allegation was that competitors in either segment might be hurt.&nbsp;Yet there are clear efficiencies to be had, as widely found in studies of vertically integrated firms, with joint operations boosting consumer happiness. Buyers at Costco eagerly snap up Costco-supplied Kirkland products—which the retailer stocks in place of those of some independent producers—if they improve price or quality.&nbsp;So facts, not just a story, are needed.&nbsp; District Court Judge Richard J. Leonfoundthat the DOJ case “falls far short of establishing the validity of its… theory.”</p>\n<p>Aside from the political overtones of the case, there was good historical reason to doubt the official complaint. A cable TV programmer combined with (or split from) a video distributor several times in recent years.&nbsp;Vertical integration did not cause higher prices, as shown by econometric analysis. Nor did vertical integration lead to “blackouts,” as the DOJ conceded. A three-judge panel of the D.C. Circuit confirmed Judge Leon’s opinion, finding that “the industry had become dynamic in recent years with the emergence, for example, of Netflix and Hulu.”</p>\n<p>Owning DirecTV and Time Warner together turned out to be not much advantage, let alone a monopoly. Despite a huge boost in pandemic demand for video content, rivals soon dined on AT&amp;T-Time Warner’s lunch. When AT&amp;T bought DirecTV in 2015, it paid $67 billion.&nbsp;In February 2021, with DirecTV’s satellite subscriber base collapsing, the spun-off operation wasvaluedat $16.3 billion.</p>\n<p>And AT&amp;Tthen unloaded the video assets of Time Warner. A new enterprise—Warner Bros. Discovery—is being spun off and merged with Discovery (Discovery Channel, Animal Planet, TLC, HGTV, the Food Networkand more). The content-only firm voluntarily severs the link the DOJ critiqued as easy monopoly money. With the allegations of anticompetitive bundling, it has been cast off as not worth the trouble.AT&amp;T shareholders receive $43 billion, less than half the $100 billion AT&amp;T expended (in debt and equity) for Time Warner three years ago. The government’s scenario of anti-competitive vertical integration proved a fantasy.</p>\n<p>AT&amp;T’s maneuvers deserve whatever scorn billions in shareholder losses can buy. A cynic might offer that antitrust laws be beefed up to protect against such corporate errors, ignoring that economic penalties—more reliable and harsher than whatever antitrust enforcers might deal—are visibly in place. But little note has been made of the ironic political saga. Policymakers are moving full throttle to enact statutes to beef up antitrust prosecution in tech for exactly what AT&amp;T so spectacularly failed to do in video.&nbsp; Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) and Rep. Lance Gooden (R-Texas) introduced the “Ending Monopoly Platforms Act” that would restrict vertical mergers in online services, for example. At least five other bills for new antitrust rules have been introduced.</p>\n<p>Not only can such policies be expensive legal diversions, they can block the innovations igniting exciting new choices for customers. Netflix has integrated from streaming into movie production, after launching Roku. Hulu was created by News Corp. (Fox) and NBC-Universal (Comcast).&nbsp;Amazon Prime Video, Sling, YouTube TV, Apple TV, Disney Plus, HBO Max and Paramount Plus—each has extended a large media or e-commerce platform. Each evolved from a quest for better products. Treating entrepreneurship as suspect puts the screws to just the disruptions now roiling online entertainment markets. AT&amp;T learned the hard way that owning complementary products is no guarantee of success. </p>","source":"lsy1610680873436","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Antitrust Activists Want to Go Full Throttle. Here’s a Lesson They Should Consider First</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAntitrust Activists Want to Go Full Throttle. Here’s a Lesson They Should Consider First\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-31 14:41 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.barrons.com/articles/antitrust-activists-want-to-go-full-throttle-heres-a-lesson-they-should-consider-first-51627509048?mod=hp_COMMENTARY_3><strong>Barron's</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>About the author: Thomas W. Hazlett is H.H. Macaulay endowed professor of economics at Clemson University, and previously served as chief economist of the Federal Communications Commission. His latest...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/antitrust-activists-want-to-go-full-throttle-heres-a-lesson-they-should-consider-first-51627509048?mod=hp_COMMENTARY_3\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/antitrust-activists-want-to-go-full-throttle-heres-a-lesson-they-should-consider-first-51627509048?mod=hp_COMMENTARY_3","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1154216466","content_text":"About the author: Thomas W. Hazlett is H.H. Macaulay endowed professor of economics at Clemson University, and previously served as chief economist of the Federal Communications Commission. His latest book isThe Political Spectrum: The Tumultuous Liberation of Wireless Technologies, from Herbert Hoover to the Smartphone.\nBig Tech is in the antitrust hot seat. But before the Department of Justice tries to break up companies likeGoogleorApple,it should recall the history, and eventual outcome, of theAT&T-Time Warner merger.\nThe DOJ expended extensive time and resources to stop AT&T’s acquisition of Time Warner, marking the department’s first challenge to a major vertical merger in over 40 years. The government was unsuccessful despite its best efforts, which included an appeal to the D.C. Circuit, and time reveals that its concerns were evidently misplaced all along. The merger did not result in higher prices, program blackouts, or even any appreciable advantage for the companies.\nIn October 2016 AT&Tannouncedits plan to buy Time Warner.  Donald Trump’s presidential campaign trashed the merger in a statement:  “AT&T … is now trying to buy Time Warner and thus the wildly anti-Trump CNN. Donald Trump would never approve such a deal.”  With Trump in office, the DOJ moved to block it.\nIn 2017, the DOJ went to court tocomplainthat the merger would “substantially lessen competition in video” by allowing AT&T to “use Time Warner’s ‘must have’” networks like CNN, TNT, TBS, and HBO to raise fees charged to rival cable TV distributors like Comcast or DISH. AT&T, which had acquired national satellite operator DirecTV, could threaten “blackouts” depriving rival distributors of key programs—their subscribers would then quit and flock to DirecTV (AT&T) so as to keep watching CNN or the NBA Playoffs on TNT. Not only would major TV and cable systems be hurt, but emerging online streaming services would be crushed.\nThe government’s case focused on “vertical leveraging,” where a company uses two complementary products to make it more difficult for rivals to compete in the individual markets. Here, AT&T was combining video content creation with video program distribution; the allegation was that competitors in either segment might be hurt. Yet there are clear efficiencies to be had, as widely found in studies of vertically integrated firms, with joint operations boosting consumer happiness. Buyers at Costco eagerly snap up Costco-supplied Kirkland products—which the retailer stocks in place of those of some independent producers—if they improve price or quality. So facts, not just a story, are needed.  District Court Judge Richard J. Leonfoundthat the DOJ case “falls far short of establishing the validity of its… theory.”\nAside from the political overtones of the case, there was good historical reason to doubt the official complaint. A cable TV programmer combined with (or split from) a video distributor several times in recent years. Vertical integration did not cause higher prices, as shown by econometric analysis. Nor did vertical integration lead to “blackouts,” as the DOJ conceded. A three-judge panel of the D.C. Circuit confirmed Judge Leon’s opinion, finding that “the industry had become dynamic in recent years with the emergence, for example, of Netflix and Hulu.”\nOwning DirecTV and Time Warner together turned out to be not much advantage, let alone a monopoly. Despite a huge boost in pandemic demand for video content, rivals soon dined on AT&T-Time Warner’s lunch. When AT&T bought DirecTV in 2015, it paid $67 billion. In February 2021, with DirecTV’s satellite subscriber base collapsing, the spun-off operation wasvaluedat $16.3 billion.\nAnd AT&Tthen unloaded the video assets of Time Warner. A new enterprise—Warner Bros. Discovery—is being spun off and merged with Discovery (Discovery Channel, Animal Planet, TLC, HGTV, the Food Networkand more). The content-only firm voluntarily severs the link the DOJ critiqued as easy monopoly money. With the allegations of anticompetitive bundling, it has been cast off as not worth the trouble.AT&T shareholders receive $43 billion, less than half the $100 billion AT&T expended (in debt and equity) for Time Warner three years ago. The government’s scenario of anti-competitive vertical integration proved a fantasy.\nAT&T’s maneuvers deserve whatever scorn billions in shareholder losses can buy. A cynic might offer that antitrust laws be beefed up to protect against such corporate errors, ignoring that economic penalties—more reliable and harsher than whatever antitrust enforcers might deal—are visibly in place. But little note has been made of the ironic political saga. Policymakers are moving full throttle to enact statutes to beef up antitrust prosecution in tech for exactly what AT&T so spectacularly failed to do in video.  Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) and Rep. Lance Gooden (R-Texas) introduced the “Ending Monopoly Platforms Act” that would restrict vertical mergers in online services, for example. At least five other bills for new antitrust rules have been introduced.\nNot only can such policies be expensive legal diversions, they can block the innovations igniting exciting new choices for customers. Netflix has integrated from streaming into movie production, after launching Roku. Hulu was created by News Corp. (Fox) and NBC-Universal (Comcast). Amazon Prime Video, Sling, YouTube TV, Apple TV, Disney Plus, HBO Max and Paramount Plus—each has extended a large media or e-commerce platform. Each evolved from a quest for better products. Treating entrepreneurship as suspect puts the screws to just the disruptions now roiling online entertainment markets. AT&T learned the hard way that owning complementary products is no guarantee of success.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2047,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":801164494,"gmtCreate":1627488651618,"gmtModify":1703491062115,"author":{"id":"3574834972684297","authorId":"3574834972684297","name":"Joanteo","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574834972684297","authorIdStr":"3574834972684297"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/801164494","repostId":"2154360923","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3597,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":178829993,"gmtCreate":1626798467112,"gmtModify":1703765494806,"author":{"id":"3574834972684297","authorId":"3574834972684297","name":"Joanteo","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574834972684297","authorIdStr":"3574834972684297"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/178829993","repostId":"1177437175","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1177437175","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Stock Market Quotes, Business News, Financial News, Trading Ideas, and Stock Research by Professionals","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Benzinga","id":"1052270027","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa"},"pubTimestamp":1626791614,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1177437175?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-20 22:33","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Stocks That Hit 52-Week Lows On Tuesday","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1177437175","media":"Benzinga","summary":"Before 10 a.m. ET Tuesday, 64 stocks made new 52-week lows.\nKey Facts:\n\nTotalEnergies(NYSE:TTE) was ","content":"<p>Before 10 a.m. ET Tuesday, 64 stocks made new 52-week lows.</p>\n<p>Key Facts:</p>\n<ul>\n <li><b>TotalEnergies</b>(NYSE:TTE) was the largest, in terms of market cap, to set a new 52-week low.</li>\n <li>The company with the smallest market cap to set a new 52-week low was<b>Sonoma Pharmaceuticals</b>(NASDAQ:SNOA).</li>\n <li><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ARDX\">Ardelyx</a></b>(NASDAQ:ARDX) made the largest move down on the session, with shares plummeting 75.24% to reach its 52-week low.</li>\n</ul>\n<p>Here is a list of stocks that set new 52-week lows during the first half-hour of trading on Tuesday:</p>\n<ul>\n <li><b>TotalEnergies</b>(NYSE:TTE) shares set a new 52-week low of $40.33. The stock traded down 1.23%.</li>\n <li><b>DiDi Global</b>(NYSE:DIDI) stock set a new 52-week low of $10.69 on Tuesday, moving down 1.54%.</li>\n <li><b>China Life Insurance Co</b>(NYSE:LFC) shares set a new yearly low of $8.68 this morning. The stock was 0.0% (flat) on the session.</li>\n <li><b>Lufax Holding</b>(NYSE:LU) shares reached a new 52-week low of $8.50 on Tuesday morning, moving down 1.95%.</li>\n <li><b>Tencent Music Enter Gr</b>(NYSE:TME) stock drifted down 0.61% on Tuesday morning to hit a new 52-week low of $11.24.</li>\n <li><b>Autohome</b>(NYSE:ATHM) shares set a new yearly low of $57.65 this morning. The stock was down 3.11% on the session.</li>\n <li><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ABCL\">AbCellera Biologics</a></b>(NASDAQ:ABCL) shares moved down 3.38% on Tuesday to hit a new 52-week low of $15.80, drifting down 3.38%.</li>\n <li><b>Abcam</b>(NASDAQ:ABCM) stock hit $17.34 on Tuesday morning, setting a new 52-week low for a change of down 1.41%.</li>\n <li><b>Agora</b>(NASDAQ:API) shares moved down 5.09% on Tuesday to hit a new 52-week low of $32.59, drifting down 5.09%.</li>\n <li><b>OneConnect Financial Tech</b>(NYSE:OCFT) stock set a new 52-week low of $9.26 on Tuesday, moving down 0.84%.</li>\n <li><b>HUYA</b>(NYSE:HUYA) stock hit a yearly low of $13.80. The stock was down 2.15% for the day.</li>\n <li><b>SolarWinds</b>(NYSE:SWI) stock dropped to a yearly low on Tuesday of $9.80. Shares traded down 39.72%.</li>\n <li><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GOCO\">GoHealth</a></b>(NASDAQ:GOCO) stock broke to a new 52-week low of $9.27 on Tuesday. Shares of the company traded up 0.74%.</li>\n <li><b>Genius Sports</b>(NYSE:GENI) shares fell to $14.86 on Tuesday, setting a new 52-week low with a shift of down 0.92%.</li>\n <li><b>Gaotu Techedu</b>(NYSE:GOTU) stock set a new 52-week low of $9.86 on Tuesday, moving up 0.84%.</li>\n <li><b>MorphoSys</b>(NASDAQ:MOR) stock drifted down 1.77% on Tuesday morning to hit a new 52-week low of $16.04.</li>\n <li><b>Custom Truck One Source</b>(NYSE:CTOS) stock achieved a new 52-week low on Tuesday morning, hitting $7.92 and moving down 1.35%.</li>\n <li><b>Root</b>(NASDAQ:ROOT) stock achieved a new 52-week low on Tuesday morning, hitting $7.56 and moving down 3.39%.</li>\n <li><b>Outset Medical</b>(NASDAQ:OM) shares were up 0.36% for the day, having made a 52-week low of $40.98.</li>\n <li><b>Taboola.com</b>(NASDAQ:TBLA) stock dropped to a yearly low on Tuesday of $8.37. Shares traded up 1.05%.</li>\n <li><b>ATI Physical Therapy</b>(NYSE:ATIP) shares set a new yearly low of $7.72 this morning. The stock was up 0.19% on the session.</li>\n <li><b>Velodyne Lidar</b>(NASDAQ:VLDR) stock drifted down 5.48% on Tuesday morning to hit a new 52-week low of $8.03.</li>\n <li><b>GrubHub</b>(NASDAQ:GRUB) shares made a new 52-week low of $15.64 on Tuesday. The stock was down 3.8% for the day.</li>\n <li><b>DouYu International Hldgs</b>(NASDAQ:DOYU) stock hit a yearly low of $4.31. The stock was down 1.35% for the day.</li>\n <li><b>Singular Genomics Systems</b>(NASDAQ:OMIC) shares set a new yearly low of $18.35 this morning. The stock was down 4.72% on the session.</li>\n <li><b>Viant Technology</b>(NASDAQ:DSP) stock hit a yearly low of $16.37. The stock was down 3.22% for the day.</li>\n <li><b>Origin Materials</b>(NASDAQ:ORGN) shares reached a new 52-week low of $6.63 on Tuesday morning, moving down 0.37%.</li>\n <li><b>Meta Materials</b>(NASDAQ:MMAT) stock hit a yearly low of $3.23. The stock was down 4.88% for the day.</li>\n <li><b>Montauk Renewables</b>(NASDAQ:MNTK) shares hit a yearly low of $6.15. The stock was down 1.97% on the session.</li>\n <li><b>CareMax</b>(NASDAQ:CMAX) stock hit a yearly low of $10.25. The stock was up 0.05% for the day.</li>\n <li><b>HIVE Blockchain</b>(NASDAQ:HVBT) stock set a new 52-week low of $1.87 on Tuesday, moving down 4.54%.</li>\n <li><b>Pharming</b>(NASDAQ:PHAR) shares were down 0.15% for the day, having made a 52-week low of $10.80.</li>\n <li><b>AltC Acquisition</b>(NYSE:ALCC) shares reached a new 52-week low of $9.85 on Tuesday morning, moving up 0.09%.</li>\n <li><b>Convey Holding Parent</b>(NYSE:CNVY) stock achieved a new 52-week low on Tuesday morning, hitting $7.74 and moving down 1.02%.</li>\n <li><b>Bitfarms</b>(NASDAQ:BITF) stock dropped to a yearly low on Tuesday of $2.81. Shares traded down 3.93%.</li>\n <li><b>Nordic American Tankers</b>(NYSE:NAT) shares fell to $2.59 on Tuesday, setting a new 52-week low with a shift of up 1.15%.</li>\n <li><b>Orchard Therapeutics</b>(NASDAQ:ORTX) shares hit a yearly low of $3.20. The stock was 0.0% (flat) on the session.</li>\n <li><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CTMX\">CytomX</a> Therapeutics</b>(NASDAQ:CTMX) stock hit a new 52-week low of $5.63. The stock was 0.0% (flat) on the session.</li>\n <li><b>Alexco Resource</b>(AMEX:AXU) shares set a new yearly low of $1.99 this morning. The stock was up 1.99% on the session.</li>\n <li><b>Sera Prognostics</b>(NASDAQ:SERA) shares moved down 0.2% on Tuesday to hit a new 52-week low of $9.51, drifting down 0.2%.</li>\n <li><b>Dynamics Special Purpose</b>(NASDAQ:DYNS) shares moved down 0.2% on Tuesday to hit a new 52-week low of $9.76, drifting down 0.2%.</li>\n <li><b>Golden Star Resources</b>(AMEX:GSS) stock set a new 52-week low of $2.20 on Tuesday, moving 0.0% (flat).</li>\n <li><b>AGM Gr Hldgs</b>(NASDAQ:AGMH) stock set a new 52-week low of $8.60 on Tuesday, moving down 4.72%.</li>\n <li><b>Freeline Therapeutics</b>(NASDAQ:FRLN) shares reached a new 52-week low of $6.07 on Tuesday morning, moving down 5.97%.</li>\n <li><b>Ensysce Biosciences</b>(NASDAQ:ENSC) stock achieved a new 52-week low on Tuesday morning, hitting $8.80 and moving down 6.84%.</li>\n <li><b>4d pharma</b>(NASDAQ:LBPS) shares moved down 1.47% on Tuesday to hit a new 52-week low of $9.36, drifting down 1.47%.</li>\n <li><b>Diginex</b>(NASDAQ:EQOS) stock broke to a new 52-week low of $4.89 on Tuesday. Shares of the company traded down 2.38%.</li>\n <li><b>Ardelyx</b>(NASDAQ:ARDX) shares were down 75.24% for the day, having made a 52-week low of $1.83.</li>\n <li><b>ARYA Sciences Acquisition</b>(NASDAQ:ARYE) stock drifted down 0.7% on Tuesday morning to hit a new 52-week low of $9.96.</li>\n <li><b>Pop Culture Gr</b>(NASDAQ:CPOP) stock drifted down 1.61% on Tuesday morning to hit a new 52-week low of $6.57.</li>\n <li><b>First Capital</b>(NASDAQ:FCAP) shares moved up 2.32% on Tuesday to hit a new 52-week low of $42.55, drifting up 2.32%.</li>\n <li><b>Medicenna Therapeutics</b>(NASDAQ:MDNA) stock broke to a new 52-week low of $2.45 on Tuesday. Shares of the company traded down 2.77%.</li>\n <li><b>Sunlands Technology</b>(NYSE:STG) stock achieved a new 52-week low on Tuesday morning, hitting $0.76 and moving down 4.31%.</li>\n <li><b>Bridgford Foods</b>(NASDAQ:BRID) shares made a new 52-week low of $13.00 on Tuesday. The stock was down 0.31% for the day.</li>\n <li><b>Liminal Biosciences</b>(NASDAQ:LMNL) stock set a new 52-week low of $3.27 on Tuesday, moving up 0.19%.</li>\n <li><b>Intrusion</b>(NASDAQ:INTZ) stock hit a yearly low of $4.32. The stock was down 47.29% for the day.</li>\n <li><b>Jiuzi Holdings</b>(NASDAQ:JZXN) shares set a new 52-week low of $3.51. The stock traded down 5.41%.</li>\n <li><b>Versus Systems</b>(NASDAQ:VS) shares set a new 52-week low of $4.52. The stock traded down 0.62%.</li>\n <li><b>Tian Ruixiang Holdings</b>(NASDAQ:TIRX) stock set a new 52-week low of $4.56 on Tuesday, moving up 0.15%.</li>\n <li><b>ECMOHO</b>(NASDAQ:MOHO) shares fell to $1.25 on Tuesday, setting a new 52-week low with a shift of down 5.04%.</li>\n <li><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CEMI\">Chembio Diagnostics</a></b>(NASDAQ:CEMI) shares made a new 52-week low of $2.20 on Tuesday. The stock was down 7.52% for the day.</li>\n <li><b>DallasNews</b>(NASDAQ:DALN) shares reached a new 52-week low of $6.39 on Tuesday morning, moving up 0.2%.</li>\n <li><b>BiondVax Pharmaceuticals</b>(NASDAQ:BVXV) shares moved down 2.4% on Tuesday to hit a new 52-week low of $2.28, drifting down 2.4%.</li>\n <li><b>Sonoma Pharmaceuticals</b>(NASDAQ:SNOA) stock broke to a new 52-week low of $5.36 on Tuesday. Shares of the company traded down 4.72%.</li>\n</ul>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Stocks That Hit 52-Week Lows On Tuesday</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nStocks That Hit 52-Week Lows On Tuesday\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Benzinga </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-07-20 22:33</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Before 10 a.m. ET Tuesday, 64 stocks made new 52-week lows.</p>\n<p>Key Facts:</p>\n<ul>\n <li><b>TotalEnergies</b>(NYSE:TTE) was the largest, in terms of market cap, to set a new 52-week low.</li>\n <li>The company with the smallest market cap to set a new 52-week low was<b>Sonoma Pharmaceuticals</b>(NASDAQ:SNOA).</li>\n <li><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ARDX\">Ardelyx</a></b>(NASDAQ:ARDX) made the largest move down on the session, with shares plummeting 75.24% to reach its 52-week low.</li>\n</ul>\n<p>Here is a list of stocks that set new 52-week lows during the first half-hour of trading on Tuesday:</p>\n<ul>\n <li><b>TotalEnergies</b>(NYSE:TTE) shares set a new 52-week low of $40.33. The stock traded down 1.23%.</li>\n <li><b>DiDi Global</b>(NYSE:DIDI) stock set a new 52-week low of $10.69 on Tuesday, moving down 1.54%.</li>\n <li><b>China Life Insurance Co</b>(NYSE:LFC) shares set a new yearly low of $8.68 this morning. The stock was 0.0% (flat) on the session.</li>\n <li><b>Lufax Holding</b>(NYSE:LU) shares reached a new 52-week low of $8.50 on Tuesday morning, moving down 1.95%.</li>\n <li><b>Tencent Music Enter Gr</b>(NYSE:TME) stock drifted down 0.61% on Tuesday morning to hit a new 52-week low of $11.24.</li>\n <li><b>Autohome</b>(NYSE:ATHM) shares set a new yearly low of $57.65 this morning. The stock was down 3.11% on the session.</li>\n <li><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ABCL\">AbCellera Biologics</a></b>(NASDAQ:ABCL) shares moved down 3.38% on Tuesday to hit a new 52-week low of $15.80, drifting down 3.38%.</li>\n <li><b>Abcam</b>(NASDAQ:ABCM) stock hit $17.34 on Tuesday morning, setting a new 52-week low for a change of down 1.41%.</li>\n <li><b>Agora</b>(NASDAQ:API) shares moved down 5.09% on Tuesday to hit a new 52-week low of $32.59, drifting down 5.09%.</li>\n <li><b>OneConnect Financial Tech</b>(NYSE:OCFT) stock set a new 52-week low of $9.26 on Tuesday, moving down 0.84%.</li>\n <li><b>HUYA</b>(NYSE:HUYA) stock hit a yearly low of $13.80. The stock was down 2.15% for the day.</li>\n <li><b>SolarWinds</b>(NYSE:SWI) stock dropped to a yearly low on Tuesday of $9.80. Shares traded down 39.72%.</li>\n <li><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GOCO\">GoHealth</a></b>(NASDAQ:GOCO) stock broke to a new 52-week low of $9.27 on Tuesday. Shares of the company traded up 0.74%.</li>\n <li><b>Genius Sports</b>(NYSE:GENI) shares fell to $14.86 on Tuesday, setting a new 52-week low with a shift of down 0.92%.</li>\n <li><b>Gaotu Techedu</b>(NYSE:GOTU) stock set a new 52-week low of $9.86 on Tuesday, moving up 0.84%.</li>\n <li><b>MorphoSys</b>(NASDAQ:MOR) stock drifted down 1.77% on Tuesday morning to hit a new 52-week low of $16.04.</li>\n <li><b>Custom Truck One Source</b>(NYSE:CTOS) stock achieved a new 52-week low on Tuesday morning, hitting $7.92 and moving down 1.35%.</li>\n <li><b>Root</b>(NASDAQ:ROOT) stock achieved a new 52-week low on Tuesday morning, hitting $7.56 and moving down 3.39%.</li>\n <li><b>Outset Medical</b>(NASDAQ:OM) shares were up 0.36% for the day, having made a 52-week low of $40.98.</li>\n <li><b>Taboola.com</b>(NASDAQ:TBLA) stock dropped to a yearly low on Tuesday of $8.37. Shares traded up 1.05%.</li>\n <li><b>ATI Physical Therapy</b>(NYSE:ATIP) shares set a new yearly low of $7.72 this morning. The stock was up 0.19% on the session.</li>\n <li><b>Velodyne Lidar</b>(NASDAQ:VLDR) stock drifted down 5.48% on Tuesday morning to hit a new 52-week low of $8.03.</li>\n <li><b>GrubHub</b>(NASDAQ:GRUB) shares made a new 52-week low of $15.64 on Tuesday. The stock was down 3.8% for the day.</li>\n <li><b>DouYu International Hldgs</b>(NASDAQ:DOYU) stock hit a yearly low of $4.31. The stock was down 1.35% for the day.</li>\n <li><b>Singular Genomics Systems</b>(NASDAQ:OMIC) shares set a new yearly low of $18.35 this morning. The stock was down 4.72% on the session.</li>\n <li><b>Viant Technology</b>(NASDAQ:DSP) stock hit a yearly low of $16.37. The stock was down 3.22% for the day.</li>\n <li><b>Origin Materials</b>(NASDAQ:ORGN) shares reached a new 52-week low of $6.63 on Tuesday morning, moving down 0.37%.</li>\n <li><b>Meta Materials</b>(NASDAQ:MMAT) stock hit a yearly low of $3.23. The stock was down 4.88% for the day.</li>\n <li><b>Montauk Renewables</b>(NASDAQ:MNTK) shares hit a yearly low of $6.15. The stock was down 1.97% on the session.</li>\n <li><b>CareMax</b>(NASDAQ:CMAX) stock hit a yearly low of $10.25. The stock was up 0.05% for the day.</li>\n <li><b>HIVE Blockchain</b>(NASDAQ:HVBT) stock set a new 52-week low of $1.87 on Tuesday, moving down 4.54%.</li>\n <li><b>Pharming</b>(NASDAQ:PHAR) shares were down 0.15% for the day, having made a 52-week low of $10.80.</li>\n <li><b>AltC Acquisition</b>(NYSE:ALCC) shares reached a new 52-week low of $9.85 on Tuesday morning, moving up 0.09%.</li>\n <li><b>Convey Holding Parent</b>(NYSE:CNVY) stock achieved a new 52-week low on Tuesday morning, hitting $7.74 and moving down 1.02%.</li>\n <li><b>Bitfarms</b>(NASDAQ:BITF) stock dropped to a yearly low on Tuesday of $2.81. Shares traded down 3.93%.</li>\n <li><b>Nordic American Tankers</b>(NYSE:NAT) shares fell to $2.59 on Tuesday, setting a new 52-week low with a shift of up 1.15%.</li>\n <li><b>Orchard Therapeutics</b>(NASDAQ:ORTX) shares hit a yearly low of $3.20. The stock was 0.0% (flat) on the session.</li>\n <li><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CTMX\">CytomX</a> Therapeutics</b>(NASDAQ:CTMX) stock hit a new 52-week low of $5.63. The stock was 0.0% (flat) on the session.</li>\n <li><b>Alexco Resource</b>(AMEX:AXU) shares set a new yearly low of $1.99 this morning. The stock was up 1.99% on the session.</li>\n <li><b>Sera Prognostics</b>(NASDAQ:SERA) shares moved down 0.2% on Tuesday to hit a new 52-week low of $9.51, drifting down 0.2%.</li>\n <li><b>Dynamics Special Purpose</b>(NASDAQ:DYNS) shares moved down 0.2% on Tuesday to hit a new 52-week low of $9.76, drifting down 0.2%.</li>\n <li><b>Golden Star Resources</b>(AMEX:GSS) stock set a new 52-week low of $2.20 on Tuesday, moving 0.0% (flat).</li>\n <li><b>AGM Gr Hldgs</b>(NASDAQ:AGMH) stock set a new 52-week low of $8.60 on Tuesday, moving down 4.72%.</li>\n <li><b>Freeline Therapeutics</b>(NASDAQ:FRLN) shares reached a new 52-week low of $6.07 on Tuesday morning, moving down 5.97%.</li>\n <li><b>Ensysce Biosciences</b>(NASDAQ:ENSC) stock achieved a new 52-week low on Tuesday morning, hitting $8.80 and moving down 6.84%.</li>\n <li><b>4d pharma</b>(NASDAQ:LBPS) shares moved down 1.47% on Tuesday to hit a new 52-week low of $9.36, drifting down 1.47%.</li>\n <li><b>Diginex</b>(NASDAQ:EQOS) stock broke to a new 52-week low of $4.89 on Tuesday. Shares of the company traded down 2.38%.</li>\n <li><b>Ardelyx</b>(NASDAQ:ARDX) shares were down 75.24% for the day, having made a 52-week low of $1.83.</li>\n <li><b>ARYA Sciences Acquisition</b>(NASDAQ:ARYE) stock drifted down 0.7% on Tuesday morning to hit a new 52-week low of $9.96.</li>\n <li><b>Pop Culture Gr</b>(NASDAQ:CPOP) stock drifted down 1.61% on Tuesday morning to hit a new 52-week low of $6.57.</li>\n <li><b>First Capital</b>(NASDAQ:FCAP) shares moved up 2.32% on Tuesday to hit a new 52-week low of $42.55, drifting up 2.32%.</li>\n <li><b>Medicenna Therapeutics</b>(NASDAQ:MDNA) stock broke to a new 52-week low of $2.45 on Tuesday. Shares of the company traded down 2.77%.</li>\n <li><b>Sunlands Technology</b>(NYSE:STG) stock achieved a new 52-week low on Tuesday morning, hitting $0.76 and moving down 4.31%.</li>\n <li><b>Bridgford Foods</b>(NASDAQ:BRID) shares made a new 52-week low of $13.00 on Tuesday. The stock was down 0.31% for the day.</li>\n <li><b>Liminal Biosciences</b>(NASDAQ:LMNL) stock set a new 52-week low of $3.27 on Tuesday, moving up 0.19%.</li>\n <li><b>Intrusion</b>(NASDAQ:INTZ) stock hit a yearly low of $4.32. The stock was down 47.29% for the day.</li>\n <li><b>Jiuzi Holdings</b>(NASDAQ:JZXN) shares set a new 52-week low of $3.51. The stock traded down 5.41%.</li>\n <li><b>Versus Systems</b>(NASDAQ:VS) shares set a new 52-week low of $4.52. The stock traded down 0.62%.</li>\n <li><b>Tian Ruixiang Holdings</b>(NASDAQ:TIRX) stock set a new 52-week low of $4.56 on Tuesday, moving up 0.15%.</li>\n <li><b>ECMOHO</b>(NASDAQ:MOHO) shares fell to $1.25 on Tuesday, setting a new 52-week low with a shift of down 5.04%.</li>\n <li><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CEMI\">Chembio Diagnostics</a></b>(NASDAQ:CEMI) shares made a new 52-week low of $2.20 on Tuesday. The stock was down 7.52% for the day.</li>\n <li><b>DallasNews</b>(NASDAQ:DALN) shares reached a new 52-week low of $6.39 on Tuesday morning, moving up 0.2%.</li>\n <li><b>BiondVax Pharmaceuticals</b>(NASDAQ:BVXV) shares moved down 2.4% on Tuesday to hit a new 52-week low of $2.28, drifting down 2.4%.</li>\n <li><b>Sonoma Pharmaceuticals</b>(NASDAQ:SNOA) stock broke to a new 52-week low of $5.36 on Tuesday. Shares of the company traded down 4.72%.</li>\n</ul>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1177437175","content_text":"Before 10 a.m. ET Tuesday, 64 stocks made new 52-week lows.\nKey Facts:\n\nTotalEnergies(NYSE:TTE) was the largest, in terms of market cap, to set a new 52-week low.\nThe company with the smallest market cap to set a new 52-week low wasSonoma Pharmaceuticals(NASDAQ:SNOA).\nArdelyx(NASDAQ:ARDX) made the largest move down on the session, with shares plummeting 75.24% to reach its 52-week low.\n\nHere is a list of stocks that set new 52-week lows during the first half-hour of trading on Tuesday:\n\nTotalEnergies(NYSE:TTE) shares set a new 52-week low of $40.33. The stock traded down 1.23%.\nDiDi Global(NYSE:DIDI) stock set a new 52-week low of $10.69 on Tuesday, moving down 1.54%.\nChina Life Insurance Co(NYSE:LFC) shares set a new yearly low of $8.68 this morning. The stock was 0.0% (flat) on the session.\nLufax Holding(NYSE:LU) shares reached a new 52-week low of $8.50 on Tuesday morning, moving down 1.95%.\nTencent Music Enter Gr(NYSE:TME) stock drifted down 0.61% on Tuesday morning to hit a new 52-week low of $11.24.\nAutohome(NYSE:ATHM) shares set a new yearly low of $57.65 this morning. The stock was down 3.11% on the session.\nAbCellera Biologics(NASDAQ:ABCL) shares moved down 3.38% on Tuesday to hit a new 52-week low of $15.80, drifting down 3.38%.\nAbcam(NASDAQ:ABCM) stock hit $17.34 on Tuesday morning, setting a new 52-week low for a change of down 1.41%.\nAgora(NASDAQ:API) shares moved down 5.09% on Tuesday to hit a new 52-week low of $32.59, drifting down 5.09%.\nOneConnect Financial Tech(NYSE:OCFT) stock set a new 52-week low of $9.26 on Tuesday, moving down 0.84%.\nHUYA(NYSE:HUYA) stock hit a yearly low of $13.80. The stock was down 2.15% for the day.\nSolarWinds(NYSE:SWI) stock dropped to a yearly low on Tuesday of $9.80. Shares traded down 39.72%.\nGoHealth(NASDAQ:GOCO) stock broke to a new 52-week low of $9.27 on Tuesday. Shares of the company traded up 0.74%.\nGenius Sports(NYSE:GENI) shares fell to $14.86 on Tuesday, setting a new 52-week low with a shift of down 0.92%.\nGaotu Techedu(NYSE:GOTU) stock set a new 52-week low of $9.86 on Tuesday, moving up 0.84%.\nMorphoSys(NASDAQ:MOR) stock drifted down 1.77% on Tuesday morning to hit a new 52-week low of $16.04.\nCustom Truck One Source(NYSE:CTOS) stock achieved a new 52-week low on Tuesday morning, hitting $7.92 and moving down 1.35%.\nRoot(NASDAQ:ROOT) stock achieved a new 52-week low on Tuesday morning, hitting $7.56 and moving down 3.39%.\nOutset Medical(NASDAQ:OM) shares were up 0.36% for the day, having made a 52-week low of $40.98.\nTaboola.com(NASDAQ:TBLA) stock dropped to a yearly low on Tuesday of $8.37. Shares traded up 1.05%.\nATI Physical Therapy(NYSE:ATIP) shares set a new yearly low of $7.72 this morning. The stock was up 0.19% on the session.\nVelodyne Lidar(NASDAQ:VLDR) stock drifted down 5.48% on Tuesday morning to hit a new 52-week low of $8.03.\nGrubHub(NASDAQ:GRUB) shares made a new 52-week low of $15.64 on Tuesday. The stock was down 3.8% for the day.\nDouYu International Hldgs(NASDAQ:DOYU) stock hit a yearly low of $4.31. The stock was down 1.35% for the day.\nSingular Genomics Systems(NASDAQ:OMIC) shares set a new yearly low of $18.35 this morning. The stock was down 4.72% on the session.\nViant Technology(NASDAQ:DSP) stock hit a yearly low of $16.37. The stock was down 3.22% for the day.\nOrigin Materials(NASDAQ:ORGN) shares reached a new 52-week low of $6.63 on Tuesday morning, moving down 0.37%.\nMeta Materials(NASDAQ:MMAT) stock hit a yearly low of $3.23. The stock was down 4.88% for the day.\nMontauk Renewables(NASDAQ:MNTK) shares hit a yearly low of $6.15. The stock was down 1.97% on the session.\nCareMax(NASDAQ:CMAX) stock hit a yearly low of $10.25. The stock was up 0.05% for the day.\nHIVE Blockchain(NASDAQ:HVBT) stock set a new 52-week low of $1.87 on Tuesday, moving down 4.54%.\nPharming(NASDAQ:PHAR) shares were down 0.15% for the day, having made a 52-week low of $10.80.\nAltC Acquisition(NYSE:ALCC) shares reached a new 52-week low of $9.85 on Tuesday morning, moving up 0.09%.\nConvey Holding Parent(NYSE:CNVY) stock achieved a new 52-week low on Tuesday morning, hitting $7.74 and moving down 1.02%.\nBitfarms(NASDAQ:BITF) stock dropped to a yearly low on Tuesday of $2.81. Shares traded down 3.93%.\nNordic American Tankers(NYSE:NAT) shares fell to $2.59 on Tuesday, setting a new 52-week low with a shift of up 1.15%.\nOrchard Therapeutics(NASDAQ:ORTX) shares hit a yearly low of $3.20. The stock was 0.0% (flat) on the session.\nCytomX Therapeutics(NASDAQ:CTMX) stock hit a new 52-week low of $5.63. The stock was 0.0% (flat) on the session.\nAlexco Resource(AMEX:AXU) shares set a new yearly low of $1.99 this morning. The stock was up 1.99% on the session.\nSera Prognostics(NASDAQ:SERA) shares moved down 0.2% on Tuesday to hit a new 52-week low of $9.51, drifting down 0.2%.\nDynamics Special Purpose(NASDAQ:DYNS) shares moved down 0.2% on Tuesday to hit a new 52-week low of $9.76, drifting down 0.2%.\nGolden Star Resources(AMEX:GSS) stock set a new 52-week low of $2.20 on Tuesday, moving 0.0% (flat).\nAGM Gr Hldgs(NASDAQ:AGMH) stock set a new 52-week low of $8.60 on Tuesday, moving down 4.72%.\nFreeline Therapeutics(NASDAQ:FRLN) shares reached a new 52-week low of $6.07 on Tuesday morning, moving down 5.97%.\nEnsysce Biosciences(NASDAQ:ENSC) stock achieved a new 52-week low on Tuesday morning, hitting $8.80 and moving down 6.84%.\n4d pharma(NASDAQ:LBPS) shares moved down 1.47% on Tuesday to hit a new 52-week low of $9.36, drifting down 1.47%.\nDiginex(NASDAQ:EQOS) stock broke to a new 52-week low of $4.89 on Tuesday. Shares of the company traded down 2.38%.\nArdelyx(NASDAQ:ARDX) shares were down 75.24% for the day, having made a 52-week low of $1.83.\nARYA Sciences Acquisition(NASDAQ:ARYE) stock drifted down 0.7% on Tuesday morning to hit a new 52-week low of $9.96.\nPop Culture Gr(NASDAQ:CPOP) stock drifted down 1.61% on Tuesday morning to hit a new 52-week low of $6.57.\nFirst Capital(NASDAQ:FCAP) shares moved up 2.32% on Tuesday to hit a new 52-week low of $42.55, drifting up 2.32%.\nMedicenna Therapeutics(NASDAQ:MDNA) stock broke to a new 52-week low of $2.45 on Tuesday. Shares of the company traded down 2.77%.\nSunlands Technology(NYSE:STG) stock achieved a new 52-week low on Tuesday morning, hitting $0.76 and moving down 4.31%.\nBridgford Foods(NASDAQ:BRID) shares made a new 52-week low of $13.00 on Tuesday. The stock was down 0.31% for the day.\nLiminal Biosciences(NASDAQ:LMNL) stock set a new 52-week low of $3.27 on Tuesday, moving up 0.19%.\nIntrusion(NASDAQ:INTZ) stock hit a yearly low of $4.32. The stock was down 47.29% for the day.\nJiuzi Holdings(NASDAQ:JZXN) shares set a new 52-week low of $3.51. The stock traded down 5.41%.\nVersus Systems(NASDAQ:VS) shares set a new 52-week low of $4.52. The stock traded down 0.62%.\nTian Ruixiang Holdings(NASDAQ:TIRX) stock set a new 52-week low of $4.56 on Tuesday, moving up 0.15%.\nECMOHO(NASDAQ:MOHO) shares fell to $1.25 on Tuesday, setting a new 52-week low with a shift of down 5.04%.\nChembio Diagnostics(NASDAQ:CEMI) shares made a new 52-week low of $2.20 on Tuesday. The stock was down 7.52% for the day.\nDallasNews(NASDAQ:DALN) shares reached a new 52-week low of $6.39 on Tuesday morning, moving up 0.2%.\nBiondVax Pharmaceuticals(NASDAQ:BVXV) shares moved down 2.4% on Tuesday to hit a new 52-week low of $2.28, drifting down 2.4%.\nSonoma Pharmaceuticals(NASDAQ:SNOA) stock broke to a new 52-week low of $5.36 on Tuesday. Shares of the company traded down 4.72%.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":672,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":173100674,"gmtCreate":1626624572498,"gmtModify":1703762438659,"author":{"id":"3574834972684297","authorId":"3574834972684297","name":"Joanteo","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574834972684297","authorIdStr":"3574834972684297"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/173100674","repostId":"2152368129","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":917,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":808623750,"gmtCreate":1627574880770,"gmtModify":1703492768197,"author":{"id":"3574834972684297","authorId":"3574834972684297","name":"Joanteo","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574834972684297","authorIdStr":"3574834972684297"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/808623750","repostId":"1165345369","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2475,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":809967539,"gmtCreate":1627344658421,"gmtModify":1703487916689,"author":{"id":"3574834972684297","authorId":"3574834972684297","name":"Joanteo","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574834972684297","authorIdStr":"3574834972684297"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/809967539","repostId":"2154640389","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1286,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":809965765,"gmtCreate":1627344601657,"gmtModify":1703487914102,"author":{"id":"3574834972684297","authorId":"3574834972684297","name":"Joanteo","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574834972684297","authorIdStr":"3574834972684297"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Wow","listText":"Wow","text":"Wow","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/809965765","repostId":"2154962767","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2154962767","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1627342961,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2154962767?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-27 07:42","market":"us","language":"en","title":"American Airlines warns pilots of fuel shortages, cites logistical issues","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2154962767","media":"Reuters","summary":"July 26 (Reuters) - American Airlines told pilots to conserve jet fuel supply when possible in a mem","content":"<p>July 26 (Reuters) - American Airlines told pilots to conserve jet fuel supply when possible in a memo on Monday, saying that transportation logistics, including lack of trucks and drivers, is delaying supply to airports throughout the United States.</p>\n<p>Fuel prices have been on the rise for several months as demand for gasoline and diesel has snapped back after the worst of the coronavirus pandemic. Refiners have ramped up processing in the last several months to respond to the recovery in fuel demand, but logistics companies have complained of a lack of available drivers.</p>\n<p>\"American Airlines station jet fuel delivery delays initially affected mostly western U.S. cities, but are now being reported at American stations across the country. Delivery delays are expected to continue through mid-August,\" the memo said.</p>\n<p>Gasoline, diesel and jet fuel demand plunged in 2020 due to the coronavirus pandemic, but air travel has rebounded more slowly than other modes of transportation, so refiners have been shipping less jet fuel.</p>\n<p>As of mid-July, refiners shipped roughly 1.4 million barrels of jet fuel on a daily basis, which is still about 22% below 2019 levels, according to the U.S. Energy Department. By contrast, gasoline supplied by refiners in mid-July nearly matches 2019's level.</p>\n<p>American, in a statement, said it was aware of fuel supply issues at some airports. \"American is currently experiencing minimal operational impact due to fuel supply issues. Our team continues to work around the clock to monitor the situation and minimize the impact on our customers,\" it said.</p>\n<p>Industry group Airlines For America said that carriers are having aircraft take extra fuel at non-affected airports to offset problems with fuel supply.</p>\n<p>U.S. domestic leisure travel has nearly recouped 2019 levels, and American has said it sees domestic business travel fully recovering next year.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>American Airlines warns pilots of fuel shortages, cites logistical issues</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAmerican Airlines warns pilots of fuel shortages, cites logistical issues\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-07-27 07:42</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>July 26 (Reuters) - American Airlines told pilots to conserve jet fuel supply when possible in a memo on Monday, saying that transportation logistics, including lack of trucks and drivers, is delaying supply to airports throughout the United States.</p>\n<p>Fuel prices have been on the rise for several months as demand for gasoline and diesel has snapped back after the worst of the coronavirus pandemic. Refiners have ramped up processing in the last several months to respond to the recovery in fuel demand, but logistics companies have complained of a lack of available drivers.</p>\n<p>\"American Airlines station jet fuel delivery delays initially affected mostly western U.S. cities, but are now being reported at American stations across the country. Delivery delays are expected to continue through mid-August,\" the memo said.</p>\n<p>Gasoline, diesel and jet fuel demand plunged in 2020 due to the coronavirus pandemic, but air travel has rebounded more slowly than other modes of transportation, so refiners have been shipping less jet fuel.</p>\n<p>As of mid-July, refiners shipped roughly 1.4 million barrels of jet fuel on a daily basis, which is still about 22% below 2019 levels, according to the U.S. Energy Department. By contrast, gasoline supplied by refiners in mid-July nearly matches 2019's level.</p>\n<p>American, in a statement, said it was aware of fuel supply issues at some airports. \"American is currently experiencing minimal operational impact due to fuel supply issues. Our team continues to work around the clock to monitor the situation and minimize the impact on our customers,\" it said.</p>\n<p>Industry group Airlines For America said that carriers are having aircraft take extra fuel at non-affected airports to offset problems with fuel supply.</p>\n<p>U.S. domestic leisure travel has nearly recouped 2019 levels, and American has said it sees domestic business travel fully recovering next year.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAL":"美国航空","AFG":"美国金融集团有限公司"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2154962767","content_text":"July 26 (Reuters) - American Airlines told pilots to conserve jet fuel supply when possible in a memo on Monday, saying that transportation logistics, including lack of trucks and drivers, is delaying supply to airports throughout the United States.\nFuel prices have been on the rise for several months as demand for gasoline and diesel has snapped back after the worst of the coronavirus pandemic. Refiners have ramped up processing in the last several months to respond to the recovery in fuel demand, but logistics companies have complained of a lack of available drivers.\n\"American Airlines station jet fuel delivery delays initially affected mostly western U.S. cities, but are now being reported at American stations across the country. Delivery delays are expected to continue through mid-August,\" the memo said.\nGasoline, diesel and jet fuel demand plunged in 2020 due to the coronavirus pandemic, but air travel has rebounded more slowly than other modes of transportation, so refiners have been shipping less jet fuel.\nAs of mid-July, refiners shipped roughly 1.4 million barrels of jet fuel on a daily basis, which is still about 22% below 2019 levels, according to the U.S. Energy Department. By contrast, gasoline supplied by refiners in mid-July nearly matches 2019's level.\nAmerican, in a statement, said it was aware of fuel supply issues at some airports. \"American is currently experiencing minimal operational impact due to fuel supply issues. Our team continues to work around the clock to monitor the situation and minimize the impact on our customers,\" it said.\nIndustry group Airlines For America said that carriers are having aircraft take extra fuel at non-affected airports to offset problems with fuel supply.\nU.S. domestic leisure travel has nearly recouped 2019 levels, and American has said it sees domestic business travel fully recovering next year.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"QMmain":0.9,"CLmain":0.9,"AFG":0.9,"AAL":0.9,"AMSWA":0.9,"RBmain":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1049,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":800735545,"gmtCreate":1627317877987,"gmtModify":1703487586976,"author":{"id":"3574834972684297","authorId":"3574834972684297","name":"Joanteo","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574834972684297","authorIdStr":"3574834972684297"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Wow","listText":"Wow","text":"Wow","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/800735545","repostId":"1100647798","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1100647798","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1627313442,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1100647798?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-26 23:30","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Earnings Face High Expectations","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1100647798","media":"seekingalpha","summary":"After the bell on Tuesday, we'll receive fiscal third quarter results from technology giant Apple  for its June ending period. With the company's previous two quarterly earnings reports smashing street estimates, it's not really a surprise that expectations have continued to rise. With shares rallying in recent weeks to new all-time highs, another strong report will likely be needed to keep things going.I'm sure analysts will also be looking to see how Apple has navigated the chip shortage as we","content":"<p><b>Summary</b></p>\n<ul>\n <li>Shares go into report near all-time high.</li>\n <li>Estimates surge after two massive beats.</li>\n <li>Timing of product launches will shift revenue picture.</li>\n</ul>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bdd5b8fd99a0523d96bf052afd8c1b37\" tg-width=\"1536\" tg-height=\"988\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Nikada/iStock Unreleased via Getty Images</span></p>\n<p>After the bell on Tuesday, we'll receive fiscal third quarter results from technology giant Apple (AAPL) for its June ending period. With the company's previous two quarterly earnings reports smashing street estimates, it's not really a surprise that expectations have continued to rise. With shares rallying in recent weeks to new all-time highs, another strong report will likely be needed to keep things going.</p>\n<p>For the first half of fiscal 2021, Apple's revenues have beaten street estimates by an average of $10.25 billion per quarter. The fiscal Q3&nbsp;current average estimate&nbsp;is $73.44 billion, which would represent growth of more than 23% from the year-ago period. It's quite impressive that the current average is up more than $13 billion over the past year. On the bottom line, the street is looking for $1.01, growth of more than 56%. In the table below, you can see some Q3 key financial items for the past two years, with the current estimates for this year's period in yellow. Dollar values are millions except per share amounts.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/df8630a7ef0be70113aeac0d50265a57\" tg-width=\"476\" tg-height=\"361\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>(*Numbers estimated based on last year's split. Actual numbers to come from the company. Source: Fiscal Q3 2020 report)</span></p>\n<p>Apple is comingoff arguably&nbsp;its best quarter ever. Revenues for the iPhone were up more than 65.5% over the prior-year period, with the Mac up more than 70% and iPad up nearly 79%. Fiscal Q2 overall revenue growth was nearly 54%, so this time around we're looking for about 40% of that figure. Don't forget, on the&nbsp;Q2 conference call, management talked about a $3 billion to $4 billion revenue hit in the June period from supply constraints.</p>\n<p>I'm most curious to see how the iPhone does this time around, as it appears that the 5G supercycle seems to be going pretty well. This year, however, most expectations are that the smartphone will return to its usual September launch period, meaning new phone revenues would be generated in fiscal Q4 again. Last year's coronavirus delayed launch meant sales didn't start until well into October and even November for some models, completely changing the sales trajectory for Apple's current fiscal year. This year's launch isn't expected to see a major upgrade to the phone line itself, so demand trends will probably be more dependent on how many consumers are upgrading to 5G rather than switching to iPhones.</p>\n<p>I'm sure analysts will also be looking to see how Apple has navigated the chip shortage as well as soaring commodity prices. I don't think we will see a repeat of the 575 basis point increase in product gross margins that Q2 saw this time around, but the iPhone 12 line should still provide a nice year-over-year boost. In the long run, investors will look at growing services margins helping the gross margin percentage overall, but don't forget that the services side of the business has a lot of its expenses on the operating line.</p>\n<p>For the stock to stay elevated, management is going to need to show that work from home and stimulus money tailwinds are still ongoing. As I discussed in&nbsp;a previous article, estimates call for Apple to see quarterly revenues decline for its March 2022 fiscal period, as the company laps very high previous year bars. While that might bring out some of the bears again, the long-term trajectory still seems positive. Current estimates call for $355 billion in total revenue during this fiscal year with Apple adding another $50 billion to that total over the next three years.</p>\n<p>I hope that management took advantage of the weakness in Apple shares during the quarter for its buyback. Even though the company is spending $20 billion or so every three months, that money doesn't go as far as $145 as it does at $125, obviously. Less shares repurchased means less of an earnings per share benefit, and lower long-term dividend raises. The good news is that Apple is on its way towards $100 billion a year in free cash flow, so investors don't need to worry about capital returns slowing down anytime soon.</p>\n<p>The major issue for Apple right now is valuation. Shares finished last week trading at 33.4 times their trailing twelve-month earnings. That's basically double the mid-teens numbers from a couple of years ago, helped a lot by easy-money policies around the globe. My current price target of $162 is based on a 30X multiple of $5.40 in EPS for the September 2022 period. That number, however, assumes that the Fed and other central banks will remain fairly accommodative through most of next year. If we start to get a lot of tapering and or rate hikes earlier than expected, the overall market is likely to feel some pain, and I don't see how Apple would be immune from that.</p>\n<p>A strong report from Apple could easily help shares to rise to a new all-time high. But just to play devil's advocate for a minute, what if there is a disappointment or a \"buy the rumor, sell the news\" reaction? Well, shares are quite a bit above their key moving averages as seen in the chart below (50-day in purple, 200-day in orange). As long as Apple can hold the shorter-term trend line, that rising technical level should be one of support. The stock has been able to hold the long-term trend line for quite a while, so I don't see any more than about 14% downside in the near term unless we get a major market pullback.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/dc37ee144edb22fd36fcd15cf5fc3470\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"273\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>(Source: Yahoo! Finance)</span></p>\n<p>In the end, expectations for Apple are very high as earnings approach this week. Two massive quarterly beats have sent estimates through the roof, and the stock has recently run to a new all-time high. The market will be looking for signs that the iPhone supercycle has continued while work from home tailwinds have not subsided just yet. Investors hoping that this rally can continue will need to see a strong report, with management hopefully painting a bright sales picture for upcoming fall product launches.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Earnings Face High Expectations</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Earnings Face High Expectations\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-26 23:30 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4441375-apple-earnings-face-high-expectations><strong>seekingalpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Summary\n\nShares go into report near all-time high.\nEstimates surge after two massive beats.\nTiming of product launches will shift revenue picture.\n\nNikada/iStock Unreleased via Getty Images\nAfter the ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4441375-apple-earnings-face-high-expectations\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4441375-apple-earnings-face-high-expectations","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1100647798","content_text":"Summary\n\nShares go into report near all-time high.\nEstimates surge after two massive beats.\nTiming of product launches will shift revenue picture.\n\nNikada/iStock Unreleased via Getty Images\nAfter the bell on Tuesday, we'll receive fiscal third quarter results from technology giant Apple (AAPL) for its June ending period. With the company's previous two quarterly earnings reports smashing street estimates, it's not really a surprise that expectations have continued to rise. With shares rallying in recent weeks to new all-time highs, another strong report will likely be needed to keep things going.\nFor the first half of fiscal 2021, Apple's revenues have beaten street estimates by an average of $10.25 billion per quarter. The fiscal Q3 current average estimate is $73.44 billion, which would represent growth of more than 23% from the year-ago period. It's quite impressive that the current average is up more than $13 billion over the past year. On the bottom line, the street is looking for $1.01, growth of more than 56%. In the table below, you can see some Q3 key financial items for the past two years, with the current estimates for this year's period in yellow. Dollar values are millions except per share amounts.\n(*Numbers estimated based on last year's split. Actual numbers to come from the company. Source: Fiscal Q3 2020 report)\nApple is comingoff arguably its best quarter ever. Revenues for the iPhone were up more than 65.5% over the prior-year period, with the Mac up more than 70% and iPad up nearly 79%. Fiscal Q2 overall revenue growth was nearly 54%, so this time around we're looking for about 40% of that figure. Don't forget, on the Q2 conference call, management talked about a $3 billion to $4 billion revenue hit in the June period from supply constraints.\nI'm most curious to see how the iPhone does this time around, as it appears that the 5G supercycle seems to be going pretty well. This year, however, most expectations are that the smartphone will return to its usual September launch period, meaning new phone revenues would be generated in fiscal Q4 again. Last year's coronavirus delayed launch meant sales didn't start until well into October and even November for some models, completely changing the sales trajectory for Apple's current fiscal year. This year's launch isn't expected to see a major upgrade to the phone line itself, so demand trends will probably be more dependent on how many consumers are upgrading to 5G rather than switching to iPhones.\nI'm sure analysts will also be looking to see how Apple has navigated the chip shortage as well as soaring commodity prices. I don't think we will see a repeat of the 575 basis point increase in product gross margins that Q2 saw this time around, but the iPhone 12 line should still provide a nice year-over-year boost. In the long run, investors will look at growing services margins helping the gross margin percentage overall, but don't forget that the services side of the business has a lot of its expenses on the operating line.\nFor the stock to stay elevated, management is going to need to show that work from home and stimulus money tailwinds are still ongoing. As I discussed in a previous article, estimates call for Apple to see quarterly revenues decline for its March 2022 fiscal period, as the company laps very high previous year bars. While that might bring out some of the bears again, the long-term trajectory still seems positive. Current estimates call for $355 billion in total revenue during this fiscal year with Apple adding another $50 billion to that total over the next three years.\nI hope that management took advantage of the weakness in Apple shares during the quarter for its buyback. Even though the company is spending $20 billion or so every three months, that money doesn't go as far as $145 as it does at $125, obviously. Less shares repurchased means less of an earnings per share benefit, and lower long-term dividend raises. The good news is that Apple is on its way towards $100 billion a year in free cash flow, so investors don't need to worry about capital returns slowing down anytime soon.\nThe major issue for Apple right now is valuation. Shares finished last week trading at 33.4 times their trailing twelve-month earnings. That's basically double the mid-teens numbers from a couple of years ago, helped a lot by easy-money policies around the globe. My current price target of $162 is based on a 30X multiple of $5.40 in EPS for the September 2022 period. That number, however, assumes that the Fed and other central banks will remain fairly accommodative through most of next year. If we start to get a lot of tapering and or rate hikes earlier than expected, the overall market is likely to feel some pain, and I don't see how Apple would be immune from that.\nA strong report from Apple could easily help shares to rise to a new all-time high. But just to play devil's advocate for a minute, what if there is a disappointment or a \"buy the rumor, sell the news\" reaction? Well, shares are quite a bit above their key moving averages as seen in the chart below (50-day in purple, 200-day in orange). As long as Apple can hold the shorter-term trend line, that rising technical level should be one of support. The stock has been able to hold the long-term trend line for quite a while, so I don't see any more than about 14% downside in the near term unless we get a major market pullback.\n(Source: Yahoo! Finance)\nIn the end, expectations for Apple are very high as earnings approach this week. Two massive quarterly beats have sent estimates through the roof, and the stock has recently run to a new all-time high. The market will be looking for signs that the iPhone supercycle has continued while work from home tailwinds have not subsided just yet. Investors hoping that this rally can continue will need to see a strong report, with management hopefully painting a bright sales picture for upcoming fall product launches.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"AAPL":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":781,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":800735188,"gmtCreate":1627317844144,"gmtModify":1703487586289,"author":{"id":"3574834972684297","authorId":"3574834972684297","name":"Joanteo","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574834972684297","authorIdStr":"3574834972684297"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/800735188","repostId":"2154957883","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1175,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":177505219,"gmtCreate":1627234342431,"gmtModify":1703485822270,"author":{"id":"3574834972684297","authorId":"3574834972684297","name":"Joanteo","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574834972684297","authorIdStr":"3574834972684297"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/177505219","repostId":"2153936352","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":930,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":178820481,"gmtCreate":1626798441443,"gmtModify":1703765494322,"author":{"id":"3574834972684297","authorId":"3574834972684297","name":"Joanteo","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574834972684297","authorIdStr":"3574834972684297"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/178820481","repostId":"1171942645","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":615,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":141516688,"gmtCreate":1625879993044,"gmtModify":1703750284708,"author":{"id":"3574834972684297","authorId":"3574834972684297","name":"Joanteo","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574834972684297","authorIdStr":"3574834972684297"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Enter both&nbsp;","listText":"Enter both&nbsp;","text":"Enter both","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/141516688","repostId":"1145284684","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1145284684","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1625878443,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1145284684?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-10 08:54","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Taiwan Semiconductor Vs. United Microelectronics Stock: Which Is The Better Buy?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1145284684","media":"seekingalpha","summary":"Summary\n\nTSMC is the world’s largest foundry for making ICs for fabless semiconductor companies, man","content":"<p><b>Summary</b></p>\n<ul>\n <li>TSMC is the world’s largest foundry for making ICs for fabless semiconductor companies, manufacturing 11,617 different products using 281 distinct technologies for 510 different customers.</li>\n <li>TSMC and fellow Taiwan foundry United Microelectronics Corporation are expected to benefit from a chip-supply crisis that is adversely impacting automakers.</li>\n <li>TSMC benefits from a gross margin nearly twice that of UMC.</li>\n <li>40% of revenues are from nodes &lt;14nm, below the smallest node of UMC.</li>\n</ul>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d80e662ebb3b78dd0445ecc891cf8986\" tg-width=\"768\" tg-height=\"513\"><span>BING-JHEN HONG/iStock Editorial via Getty Images</span></p>\n<p>Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited or TSMC (TSM), and United Microelectronics Corporation or UMC (UMC) are both headquartered in Taiwan and both manufacture semiconductors for companies on a contract basis. They both provide high quality IC fabrication services, focusing on logic and various specialty technologies to serve all major sectors of the electronics industry and are defined as pure-play foundries.</p>\n<p>While they have similarities, the two companies are vastly different with different business models. TSMC started as and has always been a leading-edge company, manufacturing chips at the smallest dimensions. UMC, on the other hand, Taiwan’s first semiconductor company, has chosen the 14nm node as the smallest dimension it will manufacture.</p>\n<p>To illustrate the differences in models, Chart 1 shows revenues for both companies based on technology node. The key difference is the &lt;14nm node, where TSMC generated 41.4% of its revenue compared to 0% for UMC.</p>\n<p>Chart 1 also shows that TSMC held $43 billion in revenues in 2020 versus $6 billion for UMC. Importantly, it shows also shows the financial dominance of TSMC, since UMC holds second place in the global foundry market.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cf3b088585f8a624c6665040756e940f\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"462\"><span>Chart 1</span></p>\n<p>Much of TSMC’s revenues are on the &lt;14nm node, which increased from 29.4% of revenues in 2019 to 41.4% in 2020. Since UMC’s smallest node is 28nm/14nm, UMC is investing heavily at that node, and its share of revenue increased from 11.3% in 2019 to 13.6% in 2020. In contrast, in 2020 TSMC’s share at the 28nm/14nm node decreased to 30.8% from 37.7% in 2019.</p>\n<p><b>Expanding Capacity</b></p>\n<p><b>Leading Edge Nodes</b></p>\n<p>TSMC generates about 1/3 of its revenues from the 28nm/14nm, and TSMC has 562,000 wafers/month of 8\" capacity, and 745,000 wafers/month of 12\" capacity. The total capacity is 995,000 wafers/month (12-inch equivalent).</p>\n<p>In TSMC’sQ1 2021 earnings call, TSMC’s VP and CFO Wendell Huang noted:</p>\n<blockquote>\n “In order to meet the increasing demand for our advanced and specialty technologies in the next several years, we have decided to raise our full year 2021 CapEx to be around USD 30 billion. About 80% of the 2021 capital budget will be allocated for advanced process technologies, including 3-nanometer, 5-nanometer and 7-nanometer. About 10% will be spent for advanced packaging and mask making, and about 10% will be spent for specialty technologies.”\n</blockquote>\n<p>TSMC expects to invest about $100 billion through the next 3 years to increase capacity, to support the manufacturing and R&amp;D of leading-edge and specialty technologies. Its N5 is already in its second year of volume production, contributing around 20% of our wafer revenue in 2021. N4 risk production is targeted for second half this year and volume production in 2022.</p>\n<p>Among TSMC's facilities to go online in the next three to four years are the company's&nbsp;fab in Arizona&nbsp;as well as its first 2nm-capable fab in Taiwan. The company needs to build and equip its N5-capable fab in Arizona. The facility will cost around $12 billion, will have a capacity of 20,000 wafer starts per month (WSPM), and will come online in 2024.</p>\n<p><b>28nm Nodes</b></p>\n<p>The global semiconductor shortage is one of the catalysts prompting foundry manufacturers to build new fabs, particularly at the 28nm node, as many automobile chips are manufactured at that node. While I have devoted four Seeking Alpha articles on trying to pin down what devices are undersupplied and could only find microcontrollers, in this article, I will concede for the sake of argument, that it is not due to hoarding but inept manufacturing supply chains.</p>\n<p>As a result, governments are spending heavily on this industry to expand the total production capacity. These free handouts are a second catalyst for new 28nm node fab construction.</p>\n<p>A strong demand for wafers from the consumer electronics industry has led to increased shipments of UMC’s 28nm wafers, which saw 18% sequential revenue growth in the last reported quarter. In addition, UMC has been focused on production for the automotive industry as semiconductors for electric and self-driving cars are expected to be a major growth driver for the company. However, global automotive semiconductors are only a $40 billion market, compared to a global semiconductor market of $525 billion. That is growing as more semiconductors are used per vehicle each year and because EVs use more semiconductors than internal combustion vehicles.</p>\n<p>There is a supply-demand imbalance in mature nodes, as most of the capacity expansion has been in advanced nodes, but companies have not addressed the mature nodes. The technology node is central to the latest auto chip crisis, while at the same time Sony has moved its design of CMOS Integrated Sensors (\"CIS\") for smartphones to 28nm.</p>\n<p>On April 22, TSMC announced plans to build a chip fabrication facility in China is at the receiving end of opposition from critics. The plant is set to make semiconductors built on the mature 28nm process node. The Nanjing plant currently has an installed capacity of 20,000 wafers per month. An investment of $2.8 billion and expecting mass-production in 2023, the expansion will double capacity to 40,000 wafers per month.</p>\n<p>TSMC has global 562,000 wafers/month of 8\" capacity, and 745,000 wafers/month of 12\" capacity. The total capacity is 995,000 wafers/month (12-inch equivalent). The new fab with a 20,000 wafer per month capacity represents just 2% of the company’s total capacity.</p>\n<p>UMC also expanded its production of 28nm (with a migration to 40nm) process at its Nanke 12-inch Fab 12A P6 plant in Taiwan. It currently has an 87,000 wafer per month capacity. The total investment in the capacity expansion plan is estimated to be approximately NT$100 billion. The P6 expansion is scheduled for production in the second quarter of 2023, and has a capacity of just 10,000 wafers per month.</p>\n<p>The P6 program is supported by a multi-year's product alignment between UMC and the involved customers that includes a loading protection mechanism that will ensure the P6 capacity is maintained at a healthy loading level.</p>\n<p>UMC has total 12 fabs in production with combined capacity close to 800,000 wafers per month (8-in equivalent).</p>\n<p><b>Price Per Wafer</b></p>\n<p>Chart 2 shows the gross profit by node for an IC device. It partially explains the rationale behind TSMC’s business model to move to advanced nodes, while also explaining why the company chose to leave its 28nm node undersupplied until recent external forces prompted it to build its China fab.</p>\n<p>Gross profits per 300-mm wafer are $2,835 for a 28nm node versus $8,695 for a 3nm node.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9e241c85dd84eb71f54c3b11812e6599\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"462\"><span>Chart 2</span></p>\n<p>Chart 3 shows capex spend by node for ICs. Capex spend (building + equipment) at 28nm is $100,000 per wafer, which more than triples to $320,000 at 3nm.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1f8f60218f2b914e5847e2eef8aa39c3\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"462\"><span>Chart 3</span></p>\n<p><b>Customer Base</b></p>\n<p>Chart 4 shows that Apple (AAPL) was the largest customer of TSMC in 2020, representing 21% of revenues. Keep in mind that in addition to TSMC’s processors going into iPhones, TSMC also fabricates the M1, which powers the new MacBook Air, 13-inch MacBook Pro, and Mac mini and is Apple's first custom-designed Arm-based chip for Mac.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/354a97772e16c2a05dbccc89556de9eb\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"465\"><span>Chart 4</span></p>\n<p>TSMC has upgraded its manufacturing capabilities countless times to keep Apple’s latest chips at the bleeding edge of processor technologies, since its first chip produced for Apple was installed in the Apple iPhone 6 and iPhone 6 Plus, which were introduced on September 9, 2014.</p>\n<p>Chart 5 shows that the number of transistors increased from 2 billion for the iPhone 6 to 11.8 billion for the current iPhone 12.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/108ef270fe60691ec5bc8c7f0a061d9c\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"462\"><span>Chart 5</span></p>\n<p>Thus, investors must consider that:</p>\n<p>Any positive developments from Apple will impact TSMC positively, and positive technological developments from TSMC will impact Apple positively. For example, as long as TSMC is the major manufacturer of Apple chips, growth in Apple or new technologies developed by Apple requiring chips (such as Auto or ADAS), then TSMC will gain.</p>\n<p>Secondly, because of capacity limitations and technology node demands, any expansion in capacity from TSMC will be beneficial to Apple as it moves to smaller nodes while consuming about 25% of TSMC’s chip output on a revenue basis.</p>\n<p>UMC is less transparent and doesn’t provide a breakdown by customer. UMC’s primary customers include premier integrated device manufacturers, such as Texas Instruments(NASDAQ:TXN)and Intel Mobile(NASDAQ:INTC), plus leading fabless design companies, such as MediaTek(OTCPK:MDTKF), Realtek, Qualcomm(NASDAQ:QCOM)and Novatek.</p>\n<p>In August 2018, UMC announced it would pause research for advancing the productional technology of chips under 10nm nodes. As shown in the figure above, since 2018, the corresponding proportion of the company's advanced processes has been reduced to zero, but for mature nodes such as 65nm and 28nm, the proportion has been increased.</p>\n<p><b>Investor Takeaways</b>: Is TSM Or UMC Stock A Better Buy?</p>\n<p>Both companies compete in the same industry, but their business models are a differentiating metric. TSMC generates most of its revenue on nodes smaller than UMC’s (Chart 1), and most of its planned capex will focus new fabs making ICs at increasing smaller nodes.</p>\n<p><b>TSMC Positives</b></p>\n<p>TSMC’s share of the pure-play foundry market was 57% share in 2020, up from 55% in 2019. UMC’s share was constant at slightly less than 8%.</p>\n<p>TSMC benefits from the smaller nodes. Although capex increases with decreasing nodes (Chart 3), so too does gross profit (Chart 2). Thus, TSM has higher revenues than UMC: $48.2B vs $6.283B.</p>\n<ul>\n <li><p>TSMC also has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): $33B vs. UMC $2.349B.</p></li>\n <li><p>TSMC ($613B) has a higher market cap than UMC ($23.4B).</p></li>\n <li><p>TSMC has more cash on hand: $23.3B vs. UMC ($3.76B).</p></li>\n <li><p>TSMC has a higher EPS (3.99) than UMC (0.59).</p></li>\n</ul>\n<p>Seeking Alpha’s quant ratings are derived by measuring a stock's financial metrics against other stocks in the sector on the basis of value, growth, profitability, momentum and analysts’ earnings revisions. In Table 1, both stocks have high rankings. TSMC has a quant rating of 4.63 and UMC has a quant rating of 4.54.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/55db72bd38ddd1d46c2ec7a6ccf6307f\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"117\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>Gross margin for TSMC and UMC is shown in Table 2. A positive for TSMC, gross margin is significantly ahead of UMC and the average of all foundries. The Street expects 3Q21 gross margin will improve to 52.9%, given a higher revenue scale, tight foundry supply and improved efficiency of 5nm production.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4ab6dce4d14398755080d9db48522121\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"126\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p><b>UMC Positives</b></p>\n<p>The comparison of other financial metrics, UMC has stronger financials:</p>\n<ul>\n <li><p>UMC has a lower P/E ratio than TSM: 21.8 vs 28.9</p></li>\n <li><p>UMC has less debt than TSM: $2.47B vs $15.4B.</p></li>\n <li><p>UMC YTD gains are higher at: 10.558 vs. TSM (8.922).</p></li>\n</ul>\n<p>Table 3 shows stock performance in percent growth for TSM and UMC. In the past year, UMC stock has outperformed TSMC, and did so in the 3-year and 5-year period. But in a 10-year period, TSMC is the better choice.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7533369f256853d498f5492752417e05\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"172\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>TSMC is the clear winner over UMC going forward. The company chose its strategy to build chips at the &lt;7nm node. The fact that it is building a 28nm fab in China, the “sweet spot” for UMC, coupled with a new 28nm SMIC (OTCQX:SMICY) fab, will mean lost market share at this node for UMC.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Taiwan Semiconductor Vs. United Microelectronics Stock: Which Is The Better Buy?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTaiwan Semiconductor Vs. United Microelectronics Stock: Which Is The Better Buy?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-10 08:54 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4438509-taiwan-semiconductor-vs-united-microelectronics-stock><strong>seekingalpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Summary\n\nTSMC is the world’s largest foundry for making ICs for fabless semiconductor companies, manufacturing 11,617 different products using 281 distinct technologies for 510 different customers.\n...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4438509-taiwan-semiconductor-vs-united-microelectronics-stock\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSM":"台积电","UMC":"联电"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4438509-taiwan-semiconductor-vs-united-microelectronics-stock","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1145284684","content_text":"Summary\n\nTSMC is the world’s largest foundry for making ICs for fabless semiconductor companies, manufacturing 11,617 different products using 281 distinct technologies for 510 different customers.\nTSMC and fellow Taiwan foundry United Microelectronics Corporation are expected to benefit from a chip-supply crisis that is adversely impacting automakers.\nTSMC benefits from a gross margin nearly twice that of UMC.\n40% of revenues are from nodes <14nm, below the smallest node of UMC.\n\nBING-JHEN HONG/iStock Editorial via Getty Images\nTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited or TSMC (TSM), and United Microelectronics Corporation or UMC (UMC) are both headquartered in Taiwan and both manufacture semiconductors for companies on a contract basis. They both provide high quality IC fabrication services, focusing on logic and various specialty technologies to serve all major sectors of the electronics industry and are defined as pure-play foundries.\nWhile they have similarities, the two companies are vastly different with different business models. TSMC started as and has always been a leading-edge company, manufacturing chips at the smallest dimensions. UMC, on the other hand, Taiwan’s first semiconductor company, has chosen the 14nm node as the smallest dimension it will manufacture.\nTo illustrate the differences in models, Chart 1 shows revenues for both companies based on technology node. The key difference is the <14nm node, where TSMC generated 41.4% of its revenue compared to 0% for UMC.\nChart 1 also shows that TSMC held $43 billion in revenues in 2020 versus $6 billion for UMC. Importantly, it shows also shows the financial dominance of TSMC, since UMC holds second place in the global foundry market.\nChart 1\nMuch of TSMC’s revenues are on the <14nm node, which increased from 29.4% of revenues in 2019 to 41.4% in 2020. Since UMC’s smallest node is 28nm/14nm, UMC is investing heavily at that node, and its share of revenue increased from 11.3% in 2019 to 13.6% in 2020. In contrast, in 2020 TSMC’s share at the 28nm/14nm node decreased to 30.8% from 37.7% in 2019.\nExpanding Capacity\nLeading Edge Nodes\nTSMC generates about 1/3 of its revenues from the 28nm/14nm, and TSMC has 562,000 wafers/month of 8\" capacity, and 745,000 wafers/month of 12\" capacity. The total capacity is 995,000 wafers/month (12-inch equivalent).\nIn TSMC’sQ1 2021 earnings call, TSMC’s VP and CFO Wendell Huang noted:\n\n “In order to meet the increasing demand for our advanced and specialty technologies in the next several years, we have decided to raise our full year 2021 CapEx to be around USD 30 billion. About 80% of the 2021 capital budget will be allocated for advanced process technologies, including 3-nanometer, 5-nanometer and 7-nanometer. About 10% will be spent for advanced packaging and mask making, and about 10% will be spent for specialty technologies.”\n\nTSMC expects to invest about $100 billion through the next 3 years to increase capacity, to support the manufacturing and R&D of leading-edge and specialty technologies. Its N5 is already in its second year of volume production, contributing around 20% of our wafer revenue in 2021. N4 risk production is targeted for second half this year and volume production in 2022.\nAmong TSMC's facilities to go online in the next three to four years are the company's fab in Arizona as well as its first 2nm-capable fab in Taiwan. The company needs to build and equip its N5-capable fab in Arizona. The facility will cost around $12 billion, will have a capacity of 20,000 wafer starts per month (WSPM), and will come online in 2024.\n28nm Nodes\nThe global semiconductor shortage is one of the catalysts prompting foundry manufacturers to build new fabs, particularly at the 28nm node, as many automobile chips are manufactured at that node. While I have devoted four Seeking Alpha articles on trying to pin down what devices are undersupplied and could only find microcontrollers, in this article, I will concede for the sake of argument, that it is not due to hoarding but inept manufacturing supply chains.\nAs a result, governments are spending heavily on this industry to expand the total production capacity. These free handouts are a second catalyst for new 28nm node fab construction.\nA strong demand for wafers from the consumer electronics industry has led to increased shipments of UMC’s 28nm wafers, which saw 18% sequential revenue growth in the last reported quarter. In addition, UMC has been focused on production for the automotive industry as semiconductors for electric and self-driving cars are expected to be a major growth driver for the company. However, global automotive semiconductors are only a $40 billion market, compared to a global semiconductor market of $525 billion. That is growing as more semiconductors are used per vehicle each year and because EVs use more semiconductors than internal combustion vehicles.\nThere is a supply-demand imbalance in mature nodes, as most of the capacity expansion has been in advanced nodes, but companies have not addressed the mature nodes. The technology node is central to the latest auto chip crisis, while at the same time Sony has moved its design of CMOS Integrated Sensors (\"CIS\") for smartphones to 28nm.\nOn April 22, TSMC announced plans to build a chip fabrication facility in China is at the receiving end of opposition from critics. The plant is set to make semiconductors built on the mature 28nm process node. The Nanjing plant currently has an installed capacity of 20,000 wafers per month. An investment of $2.8 billion and expecting mass-production in 2023, the expansion will double capacity to 40,000 wafers per month.\nTSMC has global 562,000 wafers/month of 8\" capacity, and 745,000 wafers/month of 12\" capacity. The total capacity is 995,000 wafers/month (12-inch equivalent). The new fab with a 20,000 wafer per month capacity represents just 2% of the company’s total capacity.\nUMC also expanded its production of 28nm (with a migration to 40nm) process at its Nanke 12-inch Fab 12A P6 plant in Taiwan. It currently has an 87,000 wafer per month capacity. The total investment in the capacity expansion plan is estimated to be approximately NT$100 billion. The P6 expansion is scheduled for production in the second quarter of 2023, and has a capacity of just 10,000 wafers per month.\nThe P6 program is supported by a multi-year's product alignment between UMC and the involved customers that includes a loading protection mechanism that will ensure the P6 capacity is maintained at a healthy loading level.\nUMC has total 12 fabs in production with combined capacity close to 800,000 wafers per month (8-in equivalent).\nPrice Per Wafer\nChart 2 shows the gross profit by node for an IC device. It partially explains the rationale behind TSMC’s business model to move to advanced nodes, while also explaining why the company chose to leave its 28nm node undersupplied until recent external forces prompted it to build its China fab.\nGross profits per 300-mm wafer are $2,835 for a 28nm node versus $8,695 for a 3nm node.\nChart 2\nChart 3 shows capex spend by node for ICs. Capex spend (building + equipment) at 28nm is $100,000 per wafer, which more than triples to $320,000 at 3nm.\nChart 3\nCustomer Base\nChart 4 shows that Apple (AAPL) was the largest customer of TSMC in 2020, representing 21% of revenues. Keep in mind that in addition to TSMC’s processors going into iPhones, TSMC also fabricates the M1, which powers the new MacBook Air, 13-inch MacBook Pro, and Mac mini and is Apple's first custom-designed Arm-based chip for Mac.\nChart 4\nTSMC has upgraded its manufacturing capabilities countless times to keep Apple’s latest chips at the bleeding edge of processor technologies, since its first chip produced for Apple was installed in the Apple iPhone 6 and iPhone 6 Plus, which were introduced on September 9, 2014.\nChart 5 shows that the number of transistors increased from 2 billion for the iPhone 6 to 11.8 billion for the current iPhone 12.\nChart 5\nThus, investors must consider that:\nAny positive developments from Apple will impact TSMC positively, and positive technological developments from TSMC will impact Apple positively. For example, as long as TSMC is the major manufacturer of Apple chips, growth in Apple or new technologies developed by Apple requiring chips (such as Auto or ADAS), then TSMC will gain.\nSecondly, because of capacity limitations and technology node demands, any expansion in capacity from TSMC will be beneficial to Apple as it moves to smaller nodes while consuming about 25% of TSMC’s chip output on a revenue basis.\nUMC is less transparent and doesn’t provide a breakdown by customer. UMC’s primary customers include premier integrated device manufacturers, such as Texas Instruments(NASDAQ:TXN)and Intel Mobile(NASDAQ:INTC), plus leading fabless design companies, such as MediaTek(OTCPK:MDTKF), Realtek, Qualcomm(NASDAQ:QCOM)and Novatek.\nIn August 2018, UMC announced it would pause research for advancing the productional technology of chips under 10nm nodes. As shown in the figure above, since 2018, the corresponding proportion of the company's advanced processes has been reduced to zero, but for mature nodes such as 65nm and 28nm, the proportion has been increased.\nInvestor Takeaways: Is TSM Or UMC Stock A Better Buy?\nBoth companies compete in the same industry, but their business models are a differentiating metric. TSMC generates most of its revenue on nodes smaller than UMC’s (Chart 1), and most of its planned capex will focus new fabs making ICs at increasing smaller nodes.\nTSMC Positives\nTSMC’s share of the pure-play foundry market was 57% share in 2020, up from 55% in 2019. UMC’s share was constant at slightly less than 8%.\nTSMC benefits from the smaller nodes. Although capex increases with decreasing nodes (Chart 3), so too does gross profit (Chart 2). Thus, TSM has higher revenues than UMC: $48.2B vs $6.283B.\n\nTSMC also has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): $33B vs. UMC $2.349B.\nTSMC ($613B) has a higher market cap than UMC ($23.4B).\nTSMC has more cash on hand: $23.3B vs. UMC ($3.76B).\nTSMC has a higher EPS (3.99) than UMC (0.59).\n\nSeeking Alpha’s quant ratings are derived by measuring a stock's financial metrics against other stocks in the sector on the basis of value, growth, profitability, momentum and analysts’ earnings revisions. In Table 1, both stocks have high rankings. TSMC has a quant rating of 4.63 and UMC has a quant rating of 4.54.\n\nGross margin for TSMC and UMC is shown in Table 2. A positive for TSMC, gross margin is significantly ahead of UMC and the average of all foundries. The Street expects 3Q21 gross margin will improve to 52.9%, given a higher revenue scale, tight foundry supply and improved efficiency of 5nm production.\n\nUMC Positives\nThe comparison of other financial metrics, UMC has stronger financials:\n\nUMC has a lower P/E ratio than TSM: 21.8 vs 28.9\nUMC has less debt than TSM: $2.47B vs $15.4B.\nUMC YTD gains are higher at: 10.558 vs. TSM (8.922).\n\nTable 3 shows stock performance in percent growth for TSM and UMC. In the past year, UMC stock has outperformed TSMC, and did so in the 3-year and 5-year period. But in a 10-year period, TSMC is the better choice.\n\nTSMC is the clear winner over UMC going forward. The company chose its strategy to build chips at the <7nm node. The fact that it is building a 28nm fab in China, the “sweet spot” for UMC, coupled with a new 28nm SMIC (OTCQX:SMICY) fab, will mean lost market share at this node for UMC.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"TSM":0.9,"UMC":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":544,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":177505030,"gmtCreate":1627234217520,"gmtModify":1703485821443,"author":{"id":"3574834972684297","authorId":"3574834972684297","name":"Joanteo","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574834972684297","authorIdStr":"3574834972684297"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/177505030","repostId":"1115106146","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":640,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":174932849,"gmtCreate":1627056598781,"gmtModify":1703483583187,"author":{"id":"3574834972684297","authorId":"3574834972684297","name":"Joanteo","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574834972684297","authorIdStr":"3574834972684297"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good&nbsp;","listText":"Good&nbsp;","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/174932849","repostId":"2153984757","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":807,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":173109006,"gmtCreate":1626624693405,"gmtModify":1703762439305,"author":{"id":"3574834972684297","authorId":"3574834972684297","name":"Joanteo","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574834972684297","authorIdStr":"3574834972684297"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Great","listText":"Great","text":"Great","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/173109006","repostId":"2152811496","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2152811496","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1626548760,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2152811496?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-18 03:06","market":"hk","language":"en","title":"Pfizer is making the case for COVID-19 booster shots. Fauci say we don't need a third dose yet. Who's right?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2152811496","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"'I think people are hesitant to support booster dosing because at least for now it's unnecessary,' s","content":"<p>'I think people are hesitant to support booster dosing because at least for now it's unnecessary,' said Dr. Paul Offit, a vaccine expert</p>\n<p>A very public regulatory debate about COVID-19 booster shots has seemingly put Pfizer at odds with federal health officials who say it's not necessary to get another shot at this time.</p>\n<p>Pfizer <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PFE\">$(PFE)$</a> last week reiterated plans to seek emergency authorization that tied waning protection from its vaccine to the more transmissible delta variant. The drug maker also said it's developing a booster specifically targeting delta, which is now thought to be the dominant strain of the virus in the U.S.</p>\n<p>Health officials and medical experts, on the other hand, continue to say there is no scientific case for COVID-19 boosters right now.</p>\n<p>\"I think people are hesitant to support booster dosing because at least for now it's unnecessary,\" Dr. Paul Offit, director of the Vaccine Education Center at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, told MarketWatch in an email.</p>\n<p>Dr. Anthony Fauci, chief medical adviser to President Joe Biden, on Sunday told CNN on Thursday saying something similar.</p>\n<p>And, in an email sent Friday afternoon and viewed by MarketWatch, National Institutes of Health director Dr. Francis Collins told staff that \"Pfizer seems to have gotten way out over their skis here,\" indicating that the company may be getting ahead of itself when it comes to boosters.</p>\n<p>But if the science evolves and it indicates that boosters are needed, that's going to present a new set of communication challenges for the Biden administration.</p>\n<p>\"It's distracting if people are getting an impression from statements from companies that they need\" to get a booster, said Dr. Lynn Goldman, an epidemiologist and dean of the Milken Institute School of Public Health at George Washington University. \"We're still trying to get people to immunize in the first place.\"</p>\n<p>The vaccination rate in the U.S. has flatlined at 48% . Telling people they need to get a third shot down line could lead to confusion, frustration, or an even more firm \"no\" from the hesitant.</p>\n<p>\"When you have so many Americans that are hesitant to get vaccinated, articulating to them that, 'Hey, the initial vaccines aren't going to be enough forever, and you're going to have to do this on a regular occurrence,' could make them more skeptical of the vaccines and less willing to get vaccinated initially,\" said Chris Meekins, a health policy analyst at Raymond James.</p>\n<p>The case for boosters is complicated</p>\n<p>Many public-health experts have said they expect booster doses will be necessary as immunity wanes and new variants emerge. However, much of that need is going to be based on when protection begins to diminish and in whom.</p>\n<p>Some experts believe booster shots will only be recommended for certain vulnerable segments of the population, like the elderly or people who are immunocompromised, and not for generally healthy Americans who want to reinforce the level of protection they already have. An influential CDC committee is expected to meet July 22 to discuss whether immunocompromised people need a booster shot.</p>\n<p>\"We believe the likely upcoming spike in cases and deaths may tip the balance\" in favor of boosters, RBC Capital Markets analyst Brian Abrahams told investors this week. \"Should a targeted booster approach be taken, we believe this provides evidence that immunosuppressed individuals and those with co-morbidities should be among the first dosed.\"</p>\n<p>This discussion is already playing out in other countries.</p>\n<p>A group of French doctors published a letter , outlining who can get a third shot depending on age, health status, and profession. Israel is now offering third doses to the immunocompromised.</p>\n<p>In the U.S., vaccine makers face a specific set of obstacles. One has to do with ensuring supply at a time when the authorized vaccines developed by Johnson &amp; Johnson <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/JNJ\">$(JNJ)$</a>, Moderna <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MRNA\">$(MRNA)$</a>, and Pfizer are still bound by the requirements of the Defense Production Act, which can require companies based here to give priority to the U.S. during the public-health emergency.</p>\n<p>\"It looks like the pharmaceutical company is at odds with our federal health officials,\" said Dr. Leana Wen, an emergency room physician, \"when, actually, this is a matter of the pharmaceutical companies wanting to be prepared, wanting to have the boosters available, if and when they're needed.\"</p>\n<p>Moderna is studying booster doses, too. It announced a new deal in June with the U.S. for 200 million doses, \"which could be used for primary vaccination, including of children, or possibly as a booster if that becomes necessary to continue to defeat the pandemic,\" Moderna CEO Stéphane Bancel said in a news release. The company has signed agreements that could include booster shots with Argentina, Europe, Saudi Arabia, and Switzerland.</p>\n<p>Pfizer has not announced any deals that include boosters with the U.S.</p>\n<p>\"I think the company believes that it can garner public opinion to support a booster over people's fear of the most recent delta variant and are capitalizing on that opportunity to try to force the government in the direction they want it to go,\" Meekins said.</p>\n<p>How long does immunity from vaccines last?</p>\n<p>In a nutshell: We don't know. There are a still a number of unanswered questions about the \"durability\" of immunity.</p>\n<p>These include: What is the level of neutralizing antibody titers that still provide protection? Will T-cell response provide immunity if antibodies wane? When will we have a test that assesses antibody levels? When will the FDA establish a \"correlate\" of protection? Will only the most vulnerable people need a boost?</p>\n<p>To further complicate things, this is the first time we've had a vaccine for a coronavirus and the first time that mRNA shots have ever been deployed. Those factors create additional unknowns. And so without answers to some or all of these questions, we are largely stuck guessing.</p>\n<p>\"We basically are operating, in my view, in a fact-free zone,\" Goldman said. \"I don't think it at all irrational to get a EUA for boosters right now. I see the rationale. How we talk about it is a different issue.\"</p>\n<p>Pfizer recently said that immunity provided by its COVID-19 vaccine can wane six to 12 months after full vaccination; other officials believe the length of immunity is close to the tail end of that estimate, including the FDA's Dr. Peter Marks, who suggested in May that it's closer to at least <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> year of protection.</p>\n<p>\"It's very unlikely that immunity is just going to fall off a cliff at some point,\" Wen said. \"More likely, you're going to see a gradual waning over time...And so I think that is part of the difficulty in translating these complicated messages to sound bites for the general public.\"</p>\n<p>See now:WHO head slams countries for ordering millions of COVID booster shots, when much of the world has not even vaccinated the most vulnerable</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Pfizer is making the case for COVID-19 booster shots. Fauci say we don't need a third dose yet. Who's right?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nPfizer is making the case for COVID-19 booster shots. Fauci say we don't need a third dose yet. Who's right?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-07-18 03:06</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>'I think people are hesitant to support booster dosing because at least for now it's unnecessary,' said Dr. Paul Offit, a vaccine expert</p>\n<p>A very public regulatory debate about COVID-19 booster shots has seemingly put Pfizer at odds with federal health officials who say it's not necessary to get another shot at this time.</p>\n<p>Pfizer <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PFE\">$(PFE)$</a> last week reiterated plans to seek emergency authorization that tied waning protection from its vaccine to the more transmissible delta variant. The drug maker also said it's developing a booster specifically targeting delta, which is now thought to be the dominant strain of the virus in the U.S.</p>\n<p>Health officials and medical experts, on the other hand, continue to say there is no scientific case for COVID-19 boosters right now.</p>\n<p>\"I think people are hesitant to support booster dosing because at least for now it's unnecessary,\" Dr. Paul Offit, director of the Vaccine Education Center at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, told MarketWatch in an email.</p>\n<p>Dr. Anthony Fauci, chief medical adviser to President Joe Biden, on Sunday told CNN on Thursday saying something similar.</p>\n<p>And, in an email sent Friday afternoon and viewed by MarketWatch, National Institutes of Health director Dr. Francis Collins told staff that \"Pfizer seems to have gotten way out over their skis here,\" indicating that the company may be getting ahead of itself when it comes to boosters.</p>\n<p>But if the science evolves and it indicates that boosters are needed, that's going to present a new set of communication challenges for the Biden administration.</p>\n<p>\"It's distracting if people are getting an impression from statements from companies that they need\" to get a booster, said Dr. Lynn Goldman, an epidemiologist and dean of the Milken Institute School of Public Health at George Washington University. \"We're still trying to get people to immunize in the first place.\"</p>\n<p>The vaccination rate in the U.S. has flatlined at 48% . Telling people they need to get a third shot down line could lead to confusion, frustration, or an even more firm \"no\" from the hesitant.</p>\n<p>\"When you have so many Americans that are hesitant to get vaccinated, articulating to them that, 'Hey, the initial vaccines aren't going to be enough forever, and you're going to have to do this on a regular occurrence,' could make them more skeptical of the vaccines and less willing to get vaccinated initially,\" said Chris Meekins, a health policy analyst at Raymond James.</p>\n<p>The case for boosters is complicated</p>\n<p>Many public-health experts have said they expect booster doses will be necessary as immunity wanes and new variants emerge. However, much of that need is going to be based on when protection begins to diminish and in whom.</p>\n<p>Some experts believe booster shots will only be recommended for certain vulnerable segments of the population, like the elderly or people who are immunocompromised, and not for generally healthy Americans who want to reinforce the level of protection they already have. An influential CDC committee is expected to meet July 22 to discuss whether immunocompromised people need a booster shot.</p>\n<p>\"We believe the likely upcoming spike in cases and deaths may tip the balance\" in favor of boosters, RBC Capital Markets analyst Brian Abrahams told investors this week. \"Should a targeted booster approach be taken, we believe this provides evidence that immunosuppressed individuals and those with co-morbidities should be among the first dosed.\"</p>\n<p>This discussion is already playing out in other countries.</p>\n<p>A group of French doctors published a letter , outlining who can get a third shot depending on age, health status, and profession. Israel is now offering third doses to the immunocompromised.</p>\n<p>In the U.S., vaccine makers face a specific set of obstacles. One has to do with ensuring supply at a time when the authorized vaccines developed by Johnson &amp; Johnson <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/JNJ\">$(JNJ)$</a>, Moderna <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MRNA\">$(MRNA)$</a>, and Pfizer are still bound by the requirements of the Defense Production Act, which can require companies based here to give priority to the U.S. during the public-health emergency.</p>\n<p>\"It looks like the pharmaceutical company is at odds with our federal health officials,\" said Dr. Leana Wen, an emergency room physician, \"when, actually, this is a matter of the pharmaceutical companies wanting to be prepared, wanting to have the boosters available, if and when they're needed.\"</p>\n<p>Moderna is studying booster doses, too. It announced a new deal in June with the U.S. for 200 million doses, \"which could be used for primary vaccination, including of children, or possibly as a booster if that becomes necessary to continue to defeat the pandemic,\" Moderna CEO Stéphane Bancel said in a news release. The company has signed agreements that could include booster shots with Argentina, Europe, Saudi Arabia, and Switzerland.</p>\n<p>Pfizer has not announced any deals that include boosters with the U.S.</p>\n<p>\"I think the company believes that it can garner public opinion to support a booster over people's fear of the most recent delta variant and are capitalizing on that opportunity to try to force the government in the direction they want it to go,\" Meekins said.</p>\n<p>How long does immunity from vaccines last?</p>\n<p>In a nutshell: We don't know. There are a still a number of unanswered questions about the \"durability\" of immunity.</p>\n<p>These include: What is the level of neutralizing antibody titers that still provide protection? Will T-cell response provide immunity if antibodies wane? When will we have a test that assesses antibody levels? When will the FDA establish a \"correlate\" of protection? Will only the most vulnerable people need a boost?</p>\n<p>To further complicate things, this is the first time we've had a vaccine for a coronavirus and the first time that mRNA shots have ever been deployed. Those factors create additional unknowns. And so without answers to some or all of these questions, we are largely stuck guessing.</p>\n<p>\"We basically are operating, in my view, in a fact-free zone,\" Goldman said. \"I don't think it at all irrational to get a EUA for boosters right now. I see the rationale. How we talk about it is a different issue.\"</p>\n<p>Pfizer recently said that immunity provided by its COVID-19 vaccine can wane six to 12 months after full vaccination; other officials believe the length of immunity is close to the tail end of that estimate, including the FDA's Dr. Peter Marks, who suggested in May that it's closer to at least <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> year of protection.</p>\n<p>\"It's very unlikely that immunity is just going to fall off a cliff at some point,\" Wen said. \"More likely, you're going to see a gradual waning over time...And so I think that is part of the difficulty in translating these complicated messages to sound bites for the general public.\"</p>\n<p>See now:WHO head slams countries for ordering millions of COVID booster shots, when much of the world has not even vaccinated the most vulnerable</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"MRNA":"Moderna, Inc.","JNJ":"强生","PFE":"辉瑞"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2152811496","content_text":"'I think people are hesitant to support booster dosing because at least for now it's unnecessary,' said Dr. Paul Offit, a vaccine expert\nA very public regulatory debate about COVID-19 booster shots has seemingly put Pfizer at odds with federal health officials who say it's not necessary to get another shot at this time.\nPfizer $(PFE)$ last week reiterated plans to seek emergency authorization that tied waning protection from its vaccine to the more transmissible delta variant. The drug maker also said it's developing a booster specifically targeting delta, which is now thought to be the dominant strain of the virus in the U.S.\nHealth officials and medical experts, on the other hand, continue to say there is no scientific case for COVID-19 boosters right now.\n\"I think people are hesitant to support booster dosing because at least for now it's unnecessary,\" Dr. Paul Offit, director of the Vaccine Education Center at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, told MarketWatch in an email.\nDr. Anthony Fauci, chief medical adviser to President Joe Biden, on Sunday told CNN on Thursday saying something similar.\nAnd, in an email sent Friday afternoon and viewed by MarketWatch, National Institutes of Health director Dr. Francis Collins told staff that \"Pfizer seems to have gotten way out over their skis here,\" indicating that the company may be getting ahead of itself when it comes to boosters.\nBut if the science evolves and it indicates that boosters are needed, that's going to present a new set of communication challenges for the Biden administration.\n\"It's distracting if people are getting an impression from statements from companies that they need\" to get a booster, said Dr. Lynn Goldman, an epidemiologist and dean of the Milken Institute School of Public Health at George Washington University. \"We're still trying to get people to immunize in the first place.\"\nThe vaccination rate in the U.S. has flatlined at 48% . Telling people they need to get a third shot down line could lead to confusion, frustration, or an even more firm \"no\" from the hesitant.\n\"When you have so many Americans that are hesitant to get vaccinated, articulating to them that, 'Hey, the initial vaccines aren't going to be enough forever, and you're going to have to do this on a regular occurrence,' could make them more skeptical of the vaccines and less willing to get vaccinated initially,\" said Chris Meekins, a health policy analyst at Raymond James.\nThe case for boosters is complicated\nMany public-health experts have said they expect booster doses will be necessary as immunity wanes and new variants emerge. However, much of that need is going to be based on when protection begins to diminish and in whom.\nSome experts believe booster shots will only be recommended for certain vulnerable segments of the population, like the elderly or people who are immunocompromised, and not for generally healthy Americans who want to reinforce the level of protection they already have. An influential CDC committee is expected to meet July 22 to discuss whether immunocompromised people need a booster shot.\n\"We believe the likely upcoming spike in cases and deaths may tip the balance\" in favor of boosters, RBC Capital Markets analyst Brian Abrahams told investors this week. \"Should a targeted booster approach be taken, we believe this provides evidence that immunosuppressed individuals and those with co-morbidities should be among the first dosed.\"\nThis discussion is already playing out in other countries.\nA group of French doctors published a letter , outlining who can get a third shot depending on age, health status, and profession. Israel is now offering third doses to the immunocompromised.\nIn the U.S., vaccine makers face a specific set of obstacles. One has to do with ensuring supply at a time when the authorized vaccines developed by Johnson & Johnson $(JNJ)$, Moderna $(MRNA)$, and Pfizer are still bound by the requirements of the Defense Production Act, which can require companies based here to give priority to the U.S. during the public-health emergency.\n\"It looks like the pharmaceutical company is at odds with our federal health officials,\" said Dr. Leana Wen, an emergency room physician, \"when, actually, this is a matter of the pharmaceutical companies wanting to be prepared, wanting to have the boosters available, if and when they're needed.\"\nModerna is studying booster doses, too. It announced a new deal in June with the U.S. for 200 million doses, \"which could be used for primary vaccination, including of children, or possibly as a booster if that becomes necessary to continue to defeat the pandemic,\" Moderna CEO Stéphane Bancel said in a news release. The company has signed agreements that could include booster shots with Argentina, Europe, Saudi Arabia, and Switzerland.\nPfizer has not announced any deals that include boosters with the U.S.\n\"I think the company believes that it can garner public opinion to support a booster over people's fear of the most recent delta variant and are capitalizing on that opportunity to try to force the government in the direction they want it to go,\" Meekins said.\nHow long does immunity from vaccines last?\nIn a nutshell: We don't know. There are a still a number of unanswered questions about the \"durability\" of immunity.\nThese include: What is the level of neutralizing antibody titers that still provide protection? Will T-cell response provide immunity if antibodies wane? When will we have a test that assesses antibody levels? When will the FDA establish a \"correlate\" of protection? Will only the most vulnerable people need a boost?\nTo further complicate things, this is the first time we've had a vaccine for a coronavirus and the first time that mRNA shots have ever been deployed. Those factors create additional unknowns. And so without answers to some or all of these questions, we are largely stuck guessing.\n\"We basically are operating, in my view, in a fact-free zone,\" Goldman said. \"I don't think it at all irrational to get a EUA for boosters right now. I see the rationale. How we talk about it is a different issue.\"\nPfizer recently said that immunity provided by its COVID-19 vaccine can wane six to 12 months after full vaccination; other officials believe the length of immunity is close to the tail end of that estimate, including the FDA's Dr. Peter Marks, who suggested in May that it's closer to at least one year of protection.\n\"It's very unlikely that immunity is just going to fall off a cliff at some point,\" Wen said. \"More likely, you're going to see a gradual waning over time...And so I think that is part of the difficulty in translating these complicated messages to sound bites for the general public.\"\nSee now:WHO head slams countries for ordering millions of COVID booster shots, when much of the world has not even vaccinated the most vulnerable","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"JNJ":0.9,"PFE":0.9,"MRNA":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":584,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}