yak72 personal page - To The Moon

yak72

yak72

No personal profile

26Follow

2Followers

0Topic

0Badge

2021-02-10

Like ?

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2021-02-05

Nice

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2021-02-03

Hmm

Market News: Ants reach overhaul agreement with regulators

2021-02-03

Northbound?

Oil company Baker Hughes is ‘cautiously optimistic’ on the outlook for energy demand

2021-02-01

Ttm

Why regulators shouldn’t get trigger-happy in trying to rein in GameStop’s stock mania

2021-01-30

?

Sorry, the original content has been removed

Go to Tiger App to see more news

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"userPageInfo":{"id":3574935717212940,"uuid":"3574935717212940","gmtCreate":1611920009558,"gmtModify":1612189778833,"name":"yak72","pinyin":"yak72","introduction":"","introductionEn":null,"signature":"","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/17a87ff9ca11712b778937c22f667b41","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":2,"headSize":26,"tweetSize":10,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":0,"name":"","nameTw":"","represent":"","factor":"","iconColor":"","bgColor":""},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":"success","userBadges":[{"badgeId":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493-2","templateUuid":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493","name":"Senior Tiger","description":"Join the tiger community for 1000 days","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0063fb68ea29c9ae6858c58630e182d5","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/96c699a93be4214d4b49aea6a5a5d1a4","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/35b0e542a9ff77046ed69ef602bc105d","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.11.06","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84-1","templateUuid":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84","name":"Real Trader","description":"Completed a transaction","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.18","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":2,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":null,"starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"post","tweets":[{"id":381187397,"gmtCreate":1612946604319,"gmtModify":1704876307288,"author":{"id":"3574935717212940","authorId":"3574935717212940","authorIdStr":"3574935717212940","name":"yak72","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/17a87ff9ca11712b778937c22f667b41","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574935717212940"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like ?","listText":"Like ?","text":"Like ?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/381187397","repostId":"1184359000","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":184,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":380056419,"gmtCreate":1612496197131,"gmtModify":1704871985890,"author":{"id":"3574935717212940","authorId":"3574935717212940","authorIdStr":"3574935717212940","name":"yak72","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/17a87ff9ca11712b778937c22f667b41","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574935717212940"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Nice","listText":"Nice","text":"Nice","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/380056419","repostId":"2109343740","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":190,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":314645322,"gmtCreate":1612348567766,"gmtModify":1704870007244,"author":{"id":"3574935717212940","authorId":"3574935717212940","authorIdStr":"3574935717212940","name":"yak72","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/17a87ff9ca11712b778937c22f667b41","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574935717212940"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hmm","listText":"Hmm","text":"Hmm","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/314645322","repostId":"2108570747","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2108570747","pubTimestamp":1612344121,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2108570747?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-02-03 17:22","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Market News: Ants reach overhaul agreement with regulators","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2108570747","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"(Bloomberg) -- Ant Group Co. and Chinese regulators have agreed on a restructuring plan that will tu","content":"<p>(Bloomberg) -- Ant Group Co. and Chinese regulators have agreed on a restructuring plan that will turn Jack Ma’s fintech giant into a financial holding company, making it subject to capital requirements similar to those for banks.</p>\n<p>The plan calls for putting all of Ant’s businesses into the holding company, including its technology offerings in areas like blockchain and food delivery, people familiar with the matter said. One of Ant’s early proposals to regulators had envisioned putting only financial operations into the new structure.</p>\n<p>An official announcement on the overhaul could come before the start of China’s Lunar New Year holiday next week, the people said, asking not to be identified discussing private information. Alibaba Group Holding Ltd., which owns about a third of Ant, erased losses in Hong Kong trading on Wednesday after Bloomberg reported the agreement. The stock closed with a 0.4% gain.</p>\n<p>Ant’s restructuring plan marks the first big step in what’s expected to be a lengthy overhaul process, as regulators draw up detailed capital requirements and other guidelines for companies that span multiple financial business lines.</p>\n<p>China only introduced its framework for financial holding companies in September and many of the specifics are still being ironed out. While the rules will eventually provide more regulatory clarity for Ant, they’ll almost certainly force the company to slow the torrid pace of expansion that has made it China’s dominant fintech player and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE\">one</a> of the world’s most valuable startups.</p>\n<p>Ant is still exploring possibilities to revive its initial public offering, which was abruptly halted by regulators in November, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> person familiar with the matter said. But given the financial holding company framework is so new, it’s unclear how long it might take for authorities to sign off a listing.</p>\n<p>Ant declined to comment. The People’s Bank of China, which oversees financial holding companies, didn’t immediately respond to a faxed request for comment.</p>\n<p>Ant’s restructuring is part of a broader government campaign to increase supervision of the financial and technology sectors. Regulators have in recent months targeted everything from health-care crowdfunding to consumer lending. In January, they proposed measures to curb market concentration in online payments, where Ant and Tencent Holdings Ltd. are the biggest players.</p>\n<p>The clampdown has fueled intense speculation over the status of Ma, who co-founded both Ant and Alibaba. The e-commerce giant has also faced increased government scrutiny in recent months, becoming the target of an antitrust investigation in December.</p>\n<p>Ma’s appearance in a live-streamed video conference in January -- after several months out of public view -- has helped quell talk of worst-case scenarios for his business empire. Still, plenty of uncertainty remains: even after Wednesday’s gain, Alibaba’s Hong Kong shares are trading about 15% below their record high in October.</p>\n<p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Market News: Ants reach overhaul agreement with regulators</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nMarket News: Ants reach overhaul agreement with regulators\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-02-03 17:22 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/ant-reaches-agreement-china-regulators-083830972.html><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>(Bloomberg) -- Ant Group Co. and Chinese regulators have agreed on a restructuring plan that will turn Jack Ma’s fintech giant into a financial holding company, making it subject to capital ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/ant-reaches-agreement-china-regulators-083830972.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9a353fd7027b404fd0462b771be77661","relate_stocks":{"BABA":"阿里巴巴","09988":"阿里巴巴-W"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/ant-reaches-agreement-china-regulators-083830972.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2108570747","content_text":"(Bloomberg) -- Ant Group Co. and Chinese regulators have agreed on a restructuring plan that will turn Jack Ma’s fintech giant into a financial holding company, making it subject to capital requirements similar to those for banks.\nThe plan calls for putting all of Ant’s businesses into the holding company, including its technology offerings in areas like blockchain and food delivery, people familiar with the matter said. One of Ant’s early proposals to regulators had envisioned putting only financial operations into the new structure.\nAn official announcement on the overhaul could come before the start of China’s Lunar New Year holiday next week, the people said, asking not to be identified discussing private information. Alibaba Group Holding Ltd., which owns about a third of Ant, erased losses in Hong Kong trading on Wednesday after Bloomberg reported the agreement. The stock closed with a 0.4% gain.\nAnt’s restructuring plan marks the first big step in what’s expected to be a lengthy overhaul process, as regulators draw up detailed capital requirements and other guidelines for companies that span multiple financial business lines.\nChina only introduced its framework for financial holding companies in September and many of the specifics are still being ironed out. While the rules will eventually provide more regulatory clarity for Ant, they’ll almost certainly force the company to slow the torrid pace of expansion that has made it China’s dominant fintech player and one of the world’s most valuable startups.\nAnt is still exploring possibilities to revive its initial public offering, which was abruptly halted by regulators in November, one person familiar with the matter said. But given the financial holding company framework is so new, it’s unclear how long it might take for authorities to sign off a listing.\nAnt declined to comment. The People’s Bank of China, which oversees financial holding companies, didn’t immediately respond to a faxed request for comment.\nAnt’s restructuring is part of a broader government campaign to increase supervision of the financial and technology sectors. Regulators have in recent months targeted everything from health-care crowdfunding to consumer lending. In January, they proposed measures to curb market concentration in online payments, where Ant and Tencent Holdings Ltd. are the biggest players.\nThe clampdown has fueled intense speculation over the status of Ma, who co-founded both Ant and Alibaba. The e-commerce giant has also faced increased government scrutiny in recent months, becoming the target of an antitrust investigation in December.\nMa’s appearance in a live-streamed video conference in January -- after several months out of public view -- has helped quell talk of worst-case scenarios for his business empire. Still, plenty of uncertainty remains: even after Wednesday’s gain, Alibaba’s Hong Kong shares are trading about 15% below their record high in October.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":323,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":314119153,"gmtCreate":1612317983172,"gmtModify":1704869665247,"author":{"id":"3574935717212940","authorId":"3574935717212940","authorIdStr":"3574935717212940","name":"yak72","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/17a87ff9ca11712b778937c22f667b41","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574935717212940"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Northbound?&nbsp;","listText":"Northbound?&nbsp;","text":"Northbound?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/314119153","repostId":"1109079107","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1109079107","pubTimestamp":1612257440,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1109079107?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-02-02 17:17","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Oil company Baker Hughes is ‘cautiously optimistic’ on the outlook for energy demand","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1109079107","media":"cnbc","summary":"KEY POINTSOil services firm Baker Hughes sees energy demand recovering in the second half of 2021, c","content":"<div>\n<p>KEY POINTSOil services firm Baker Hughes sees energy demand recovering in the second half of 2021, chief executive Lorenzo Simonelli said.He noted that some countries are still in coronavirus-related ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/02/02/oil-company-baker-hughes-is-cautiously-optimistic-on-energy-outlook.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"cnbc_highlight","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Oil company Baker Hughes is ‘cautiously optimistic’ on the outlook for energy demand</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nOil company Baker Hughes is ‘cautiously optimistic’ on the outlook for energy demand\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-02-02 17:17 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.cnbc.com/2021/02/02/oil-company-baker-hughes-is-cautiously-optimistic-on-energy-outlook.html><strong>cnbc</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>KEY POINTSOil services firm Baker Hughes sees energy demand recovering in the second half of 2021, chief executive Lorenzo Simonelli said.He noted that some countries are still in coronavirus-related ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/02/02/oil-company-baker-hughes-is-cautiously-optimistic-on-energy-outlook.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76824cd4c5b97eaacdaab63d96995a28","relate_stocks":{"BKR":"贝克休斯"},"source_url":"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/02/02/oil-company-baker-hughes-is-cautiously-optimistic-on-energy-outlook.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/72bb72e1b84c09fca865c6dcb1bbcd16","article_id":"1109079107","content_text":"KEY POINTSOil services firm Baker Hughes sees energy demand recovering in the second half of 2021, chief executive Lorenzo Simonelli said.He noted that some countries are still in coronavirus-related lockdowns, which can weigh on fuel sales in the first part of the year.Oil services firmBaker Hughessees energy demand recovering in the second half of 2021, chief executive Lorenzo Simonelli said this week.“We are cautiously optimistic,” he told CNBC’s Steve Sedgwick on Monday.He noted that some countries are still in coronavirus-related lockdowns, which decimated demand in 2020 and can weigh on fuel sales in the first part of the year.However, he expects demand to start recovering in the second half of the year, due to the vaccine rollout and improving economic situation.The chief executive’s views were in line with OPEC’s January report on the oil market, which saidvaccinations provide some “upside optimism,” and that its 2021 forecasts “assume a healthy recovery in economic activities.”The alliance expects global oil demand to increase by 5.9 million barrels per day to an average of 95.9 million bpd.Meanwhile, the International Energy Agencypredicts that world oil demand will recover to 96.6 million bdp this year.It lowered its forecast slightly citing surging Covid cases and fresh lockdowns.While vaccines put fundamentals on a stronger growth trajectory, it will take more time for demand to fully recover, the IEA said.Opportunities in oil investmentSimonelli said there would be “pockets of opportunity” for investment as the recovery takes place.“It’s going to be different in different locations geographically,” he said. “As we look at the lower cost basins, you look at the Middle East, that’s where you’ll see some of the production increases.”Brazil and Norway could also increase production in the second half of 2021, he added.U.S. shale producers, however, are likely to be “subdued,” he said. “There’s a lot of capital discipline, [and] obviously we’re undergoing an energy transition as well.”He said North America historically would increase volumes quickly, but that could change this time.“We think this will be different, just given the capital discipline and the focus that producers are having on … returns and cash flows and constraining some of the capital inflows,” he said.U.S. West Texas Intermediate futures were up 0.99% at $54.08 on Tuesday afternoon in Asia, while international benchmark Brent crude futures rose 0.89% to trade at $56.85.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":250,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":312589577,"gmtCreate":1612167304699,"gmtModify":1704867607218,"author":{"id":"3574935717212940","authorId":"3574935717212940","authorIdStr":"3574935717212940","name":"yak72","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/17a87ff9ca11712b778937c22f667b41","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574935717212940"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ttm","listText":"Ttm","text":"Ttm","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/312589577","repostId":"1183625716","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1183625716","pubTimestamp":1612163292,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1183625716?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-02-01 15:08","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why regulators shouldn’t get trigger-happy in trying to rein in GameStop’s stock mania","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1183625716","media":"marketwatch","summary":"The meteoric rise in videogame-retailer GameStop’s stock price from a few dollars to more than $300 ","content":"<p>The meteoric rise in videogame-retailer GameStop’s stock price from a few dollars to more than $300 in a couple of weeks, swelling its market value to about $25 billion, has made the company and mania surrounding it a household name.</p>\n<p>Trading in shares of the beleaguered retailer has gone through the roof.&nbsp; Short interest — bets against the company — exceeds the total shares outstanding, and call and put option volume has been in the tens of millions. Those statistics are an order of magnitude greater than for similar stocks.</p>\n<p>Investors, including those on Reddit’s WallStreetBets forum and other social media, have been buying GameStopGME,+67.87%shares, causing a short squeeze for those betting against the company, in turn forcing the short sellers to cover their positions. As a result, that’s driving the shares higher. While the saga is still unfolding, we wouldn’t be surprised that when the music stops, GameStop’s share price would return to terrestrial levels.</p>\n<p>The dramatic turn of events has led many to speculate the underlying causes and proffer regulatory remedies. Some draw a parallel to pump-and-dump schemes that seek to manipulate share prices. However, pump-and-dump schemes are already illegal, which might shift attention toward other regulatory avenues.</p>\n<p>Three come to mind: payment for order flow, a transaction tax and enhanced financial literacy education.</p>\n<p>Payment for order flow</p>\n<p>Payment for order flow (here’s an SEC study) transfers “some of the trading profits from market making to the brokers that route customer orders to specialists for execution.”</p>\n<p>This practice has experienced renewed scrutiny as a central source of revenue for retail brokerage platforms such as Robinhood, Charles SchwabSCHW,-4.09%and E*Trade. The brokers’ business model offers zero-cost trades to attract business from individual and institutional clients in exchange for the order flow payments they receive from market makers such as Citadel.</p>\n<p>Detractors argue that zero-cost trades induce excessive trading. While that might be true, it’s naïve to believe that it remotely explains the price movement witnessed in GameStop. Moreover, the lower cost of trading in all stocks and better execution have democratized investors’ access to securities markets without adverse effects on securities market. In fact, greater investor participation and trading enhance price transparency and liquidity — both desirable tenets of securities markets. Making order flow payments verboten will deprive markets of these benefits.</p>\n<p>Transaction tax</p>\n<p>Clearly, trading volume in GameStop shares is many times its historical average. This anecdotal evidence of high trading volume and high volatility might revive the financial transaction tax proposal.</p>\n<p>A financial transaction tax is typically premised on notions that trading fuels volatility, and trading, especially high-frequency trading, does not serve a useful social purpose.&nbsp;An alternative explanation is that economic news and uncertainty contribute to trading and price volatility.</p>\n<p>As the COVID-19 pandemic hit the U.S. in March 2020, the adverse news and high degree of uncertainty about U.S. economic prospects manifested in a sharp fall in asset prices and the VIX rising almost instantaneously to a historic high. Simultaneously, trading volume doubled. From April 2020, asset prices rose and VIX dropped rapidly with federal stimulus, accommodative monetary policies and Treasury fiscal support to businesses.</p>\n<p>However, trading volume has remained elevated, which contradicts the notion that trading fuels market volatility. A financial transaction tax would discourage trading, for sure, but it is unlikely to attenuate volatility.&nbsp;More importantly, price discovery might be sacrificed as a result of less trading, which would adversely affect efficient capital allocation.</p>\n<p>Finally, financial transaction taxes are also unlikely to be effective in curbing episodes such as the sudden rise of GameStop.</p>\n<p>Financial literacy</p>\n<p>A baseline level of education is a prerequisite for an individual investor to trade in options. Enhanced financial literacy education might be a promising approach to discipline investor exuberance. Still, more information is needed to determine its efficacy. This may come in the form of research on the links between education and investor behavior.</p>\n<p>Rather than regulation directly designed to curb trading, experimentation in financial markets might hold greater promise in calibrating the form of effective financial literacy education.</p>\n<p>The limits of arbitrage capital</p>\n<p>The sudden, sharp rise in GameStop highlights the clout of individual investors acting in concert. Their collective buying power has propelled the stock to loftier levels, which virtually everyone believes to be unhinged from underlying economic fundamentals.</p>\n<p>Typically, active investors, including short sellers, correct the price by selling the stock.&nbsp;However, the GameStop episode has exposed the limits of arbitrage capital that might otherwise counter the tsunami of buying pressure as a result of coordinated buying by a huge number of investors.&nbsp;A few hundred million to a few billion dollars of capital from short sellers has been too little so far.</p>\n<p>Moreover, they could not marshal additional capital to meet margin calls as the stock price rose. Worse yet, buying to close out their loss positions only resulted in additional buying pressure or the short-squeeze effect.</p>\n<p>The bottom line is, the efficient functioning of the stock market requires substantial arbitrage capital to correct mispricing that might result from coordinated buying motivated to exact a revenge of what individual investors perceive as a market rigged by short sellers. Unfortunately, in this environment of demonization of short sellers, it’s hard to imagine additional capital will flow to stem what seems like an irrational stock price rise in GameStop.</p>\n<p>Of course, only time will tell whether the price rise is rational or that it exposes the lack of adequate arbitrage capital.&nbsp;In the meantime, it behooves to resist being trigger-happy with regulation.</p>\n<p><i>SP Kothari&nbsp;is a professor at MIT Sloan School of Management and former chief economist at the Securities and Exchange Commission from 2019-2021.&nbsp;Eric So&nbsp;is a professor at MIT Sloan School of Management.</i></p>","source":"lsy1603348471595","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why regulators shouldn’t get trigger-happy in trying to rein in GameStop’s stock mania</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy regulators shouldn’t get trigger-happy in trying to rein in GameStop’s stock mania\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-02-01 15:08 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.marketwatch.com/story/why-regulators-shouldnt-get-trigger-happy-in-trying-to-rein-in-gamestops-stock-mania-11611939882?mod=home-page><strong>marketwatch</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The meteoric rise in videogame-retailer GameStop’s stock price from a few dollars to more than $300 in a couple of weeks, swelling its market value to about $25 billion, has made the company and mania...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/why-regulators-shouldnt-get-trigger-happy-in-trying-to-rein-in-gamestops-stock-mania-11611939882?mod=home-page\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b1fdaab121d904fee30d8fe32e39819a","relate_stocks":{"GME":"游戏驿站"},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/why-regulators-shouldnt-get-trigger-happy-in-trying-to-rein-in-gamestops-stock-mania-11611939882?mod=home-page","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1183625716","content_text":"The meteoric rise in videogame-retailer GameStop’s stock price from a few dollars to more than $300 in a couple of weeks, swelling its market value to about $25 billion, has made the company and mania surrounding it a household name.\nTrading in shares of the beleaguered retailer has gone through the roof.  Short interest — bets against the company — exceeds the total shares outstanding, and call and put option volume has been in the tens of millions. Those statistics are an order of magnitude greater than for similar stocks.\nInvestors, including those on Reddit’s WallStreetBets forum and other social media, have been buying GameStopGME,+67.87%shares, causing a short squeeze for those betting against the company, in turn forcing the short sellers to cover their positions. As a result, that’s driving the shares higher. While the saga is still unfolding, we wouldn’t be surprised that when the music stops, GameStop’s share price would return to terrestrial levels.\nThe dramatic turn of events has led many to speculate the underlying causes and proffer regulatory remedies. Some draw a parallel to pump-and-dump schemes that seek to manipulate share prices. However, pump-and-dump schemes are already illegal, which might shift attention toward other regulatory avenues.\nThree come to mind: payment for order flow, a transaction tax and enhanced financial literacy education.\nPayment for order flow\nPayment for order flow (here’s an SEC study) transfers “some of the trading profits from market making to the brokers that route customer orders to specialists for execution.”\nThis practice has experienced renewed scrutiny as a central source of revenue for retail brokerage platforms such as Robinhood, Charles SchwabSCHW,-4.09%and E*Trade. The brokers’ business model offers zero-cost trades to attract business from individual and institutional clients in exchange for the order flow payments they receive from market makers such as Citadel.\nDetractors argue that zero-cost trades induce excessive trading. While that might be true, it’s naïve to believe that it remotely explains the price movement witnessed in GameStop. Moreover, the lower cost of trading in all stocks and better execution have democratized investors’ access to securities markets without adverse effects on securities market. In fact, greater investor participation and trading enhance price transparency and liquidity — both desirable tenets of securities markets. Making order flow payments verboten will deprive markets of these benefits.\nTransaction tax\nClearly, trading volume in GameStop shares is many times its historical average. This anecdotal evidence of high trading volume and high volatility might revive the financial transaction tax proposal.\nA financial transaction tax is typically premised on notions that trading fuels volatility, and trading, especially high-frequency trading, does not serve a useful social purpose. An alternative explanation is that economic news and uncertainty contribute to trading and price volatility.\nAs the COVID-19 pandemic hit the U.S. in March 2020, the adverse news and high degree of uncertainty about U.S. economic prospects manifested in a sharp fall in asset prices and the VIX rising almost instantaneously to a historic high. Simultaneously, trading volume doubled. From April 2020, asset prices rose and VIX dropped rapidly with federal stimulus, accommodative monetary policies and Treasury fiscal support to businesses.\nHowever, trading volume has remained elevated, which contradicts the notion that trading fuels market volatility. A financial transaction tax would discourage trading, for sure, but it is unlikely to attenuate volatility. More importantly, price discovery might be sacrificed as a result of less trading, which would adversely affect efficient capital allocation.\nFinally, financial transaction taxes are also unlikely to be effective in curbing episodes such as the sudden rise of GameStop.\nFinancial literacy\nA baseline level of education is a prerequisite for an individual investor to trade in options. Enhanced financial literacy education might be a promising approach to discipline investor exuberance. Still, more information is needed to determine its efficacy. This may come in the form of research on the links between education and investor behavior.\nRather than regulation directly designed to curb trading, experimentation in financial markets might hold greater promise in calibrating the form of effective financial literacy education.\nThe limits of arbitrage capital\nThe sudden, sharp rise in GameStop highlights the clout of individual investors acting in concert. Their collective buying power has propelled the stock to loftier levels, which virtually everyone believes to be unhinged from underlying economic fundamentals.\nTypically, active investors, including short sellers, correct the price by selling the stock. However, the GameStop episode has exposed the limits of arbitrage capital that might otherwise counter the tsunami of buying pressure as a result of coordinated buying by a huge number of investors. A few hundred million to a few billion dollars of capital from short sellers has been too little so far.\nMoreover, they could not marshal additional capital to meet margin calls as the stock price rose. Worse yet, buying to close out their loss positions only resulted in additional buying pressure or the short-squeeze effect.\nThe bottom line is, the efficient functioning of the stock market requires substantial arbitrage capital to correct mispricing that might result from coordinated buying motivated to exact a revenge of what individual investors perceive as a market rigged by short sellers. Unfortunately, in this environment of demonization of short sellers, it’s hard to imagine additional capital will flow to stem what seems like an irrational stock price rise in GameStop.\nOf course, only time will tell whether the price rise is rational or that it exposes the lack of adequate arbitrage capital. In the meantime, it behooves to resist being trigger-happy with regulation.\nSP Kothari is a professor at MIT Sloan School of Management and former chief economist at the Securities and Exchange Commission from 2019-2021. Eric So is a professor at MIT Sloan School of Management.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":214,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":312933451,"gmtCreate":1611987877373,"gmtModify":1704866827614,"author":{"id":"3574935717212940","authorId":"3574935717212940","authorIdStr":"3574935717212940","name":"yak72","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/17a87ff9ca11712b778937c22f667b41","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574935717212940"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"?","listText":"?","text":"?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/312933451","repostId":"2107290824","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":455,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[{"author":{"id":"3527667803686145","authorId":"3527667803686145","authorIdStr":"3527667803686145","name":"社区成长助手","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2b7c7106b5c0c8b0037faa67439d898f","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3527667803686145"},"content":"Finally, when you first post [compare heart] [compare heart] post, you can get more exposure by related stocks or related topics. If you want to create high-quality articles, please checkGuidelines for Tiger Community Creation","text":"Finally, when you first post [compare heart] [compare heart] post, you can get more exposure by related stocks or related topics. If you want to create high-quality articles, please checkGuidelines for Tiger Community Creation","html":"Finally, when you first post [compare heart] [compare heart] post, you can get more exposure by related stocks or related topics. If you want to create high-quality articles, please checkGuidelines for Tiger Community Creation"}],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":381187397,"gmtCreate":1612946604319,"gmtModify":1704876307288,"author":{"id":"3574935717212940","authorId":"3574935717212940","authorIdStr":"3574935717212940","name":"yak72","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/17a87ff9ca11712b778937c22f667b41","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574935717212940"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like ?","listText":"Like ?","text":"Like ?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/381187397","repostId":"1184359000","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1184359000","pubTimestamp":1612945652,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1184359000?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-02-10 16:27","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why Oil Is Likely Headed Much Higher From Here","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1184359000","media":"seekingalpha","summary":"Summary\n\nOil's supply demand dynamic illustrates that higher prices are probable.\nOPEC+ nations led ","content":"<p><b>Summary</b></p>\n<ul>\n <li>Oil's supply demand dynamic illustrates that higher prices are probable.</li>\n <li>OPEC+ nations led by Russia and Saudi Arabia are likely to continue to create artificial supply constraints in the market.</li>\n <li>On the other side of the equation, oil demand is likely to rise notably as the coronavirus pandemic eases into H2 and 2022.</li>\n <li>Finally, there is the inflation factor that is likely to enable oil prices to appreciate notably into year-end and next year.</li>\n <li>Some companies that we like going forward.</li>\n</ul>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9035126bf930f590bf4ed7d3f663dfa2\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"427\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p><b>Oil - WTI Crude</b>&nbsp;has come a long way since dipping into negative territory during the height of the coronavirus panic. At roughly -$40 a barrel it was quite surreal. Oil stocks were melting, traders were unloading barrels at sub-zero prices, this was an unprecedented time indeed. Nevertheless, fast forward less than 1-year, and oil is closing in on $60 again.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f5ea935d36d58d97819d3b18197ed45d\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"658\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>OPEC + oil producers are likely to stick to their production cuts. This should limit the supply of oil coming to market. Moreover, oil demand is likely to rise, as the coronavirus pandemic begins to ease into the second half of this year and into 2022. Furthermore, inflation is likely to rise as well going into year-end and next year. Therefore, oil is likely headed higher from here, possibly into the $70-80 range by the end of this year.</p>\n<p><b>The Supply Demand Dynamic</b></p>\n<p>Oil's supply and demand dynamic is likely the single most important driver for oil prices. We saw oil prices crash into negative territory during the height of the coronavirus meltdown. This was in part due to an extremely strong shock to the global demand side of the equation. However, on the other side, while demand fell off a cliff, major oil producers kept pumping, essentially overflowing the market with oil.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c7622d64eda60e6cf3f5177d3198f7b6\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"360\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>However, things are much different now. Saudi Arabia and Russia agreed toextend their oil cut outputs. This move puts pressure on other OPEC + nations to comply with their output cuts as well. Also, we are seeing the supply demand dynamic play out in markets, as we see larger than expected declines in U.S. oil inventories in much of therecent economic data.</p>\n<p>An important factor to consider is that many of the top oil producers in OPEC + like Saudi Arabia, Russia, as well as many other nations are developing, or are essentially third world countries. Thus, oil revenues account for large portions of these countries' GDPs, as well as their budgets. For the sake of stability, and a certain level of prosperity, it is essential to keep oil at \"an acceptable\" price for these nations.</p>\n<p>An acceptable price is around $55-65, in my view, however, a preferable price is notably higher. Naturally, the higher the price the better (within reason), but a likely lower range for a \"preferable oil price\" is probably around $70-80, and I think the this is where oil is headed by the end of 2021.</p>\n<p><b>As the Coronavirus Weakens</b></p>\n<p>As the coronavirus loosens its grip on the global economy, oil demand is likely to rise. We see that 2020's demand fell off a bit, but growth seems to have dipped just marginally into negative territory. In fact, I was expecting a larger decline due to the coronavirus pandemic.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c907dc110eae66344d9726dd142f7a19\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"316\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>Now, the good news is that we are likely to see robust growth this year, and possibly in future years as well. Global oil demand is expected to jump by around 2% this year, illustrating one of the best growth years for oil over the last decade. Also, despite future years' growth declining slightly, I don't expect this to impact price negatively.</p>\n<p><b>The Key Word is Inflation Here</b></p>\n<p>Yes inflation, which seems to be rather tame right now is not likely to remain so for long. So, CPI inflation has been running at about1.2-1.4% in recent months.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e245b798160c319d6af3389cb567767c\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"304\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>Some may say \"wow, that is pretty low\". Indeed, it is not very high, but let us put this in context. So, CPI inflation is essentially telling us that a lot of the prices surrounding us are higher now than they were a year ago. In fact, this has been constant throughout the coronavirus pandemic.</p>\n<p>This is astounding. Portions of global economies were shut down, some parts came to a halt, countless people lost their jobs, GDP fell off a cliff for a while, and all this time we see prices around us increasing. In a \"normal\" scenario we would likely see deflation occur, but we are seeing the opposite instead.</p>\n<p>Well, this is largely due to the Fed and other major central banks around the globe. For the sake of simplicity, let's focus on the Fed, the most influential central bank in the world. Perpetual zero rate policy, multi-trillion dollar backstops and bailouts, coupled with \"QE unlimited\" are causing the Fed's balance sheet to explode. We see that the Fed's balance sheet is nearly 10 times higher than where it was before the financial crisis of 2008, and it has nearly doubled just over the past 18-months alone.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/37a6e445e160da68597f94aa232e1277\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"334\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>This is unprecedented, and it makes 2008's easing look like a blip in comparison to what is going on now. Furthermore, while there were expectations that the Fed could eventually \"normalize\" rates and unload its balance sheet post the 2008 crisis, this was proved to be wishful thinking in late 2018. The economy was not able to function effectively and grow in a rising rate and quantitative tightening/QT environment.</p>\n<p>Therefore, I expect the Fed's balance sheet to continue to expand further from here. Moreover, I don't believe that the Fed will be able to shrink its balance sheet notably in the future, nor will the U.S. economy be able to withstand noticeably higher interest rates going forward.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1ab6be7928edd4536c41fd8d1b08abca\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"198\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>Here we see the Fed's balance sheet expansion translating into the expansion of the U.S.'s monetary base. The underlying phenomenon creates a perfect storm for inflation to materialize going forward. If we are seeing inflation when we should normally see deflation, what is going to happen when the economy starts to expand notably in the H2 2021, and in 2022?</p>\n<p>I think it is clear, inflation is likely to run quite hot, and I don't think that the Fed is going to be able to implement its usual tools to cool it down any time soon. If easy money stops flowing the economy could stall again. If interest rates tick higher economic activity will slow. Additionally, the enormous debt loads in every segment of the economy, consumer, and government may become unmanageable, and too costly to service.</p>\n<p><b>The Bottom Line</b></p>\n<p>There really is not much that the Fed can do to cool down inflation going forward without damaging the economy in my view. Thus, inflation is likely to run hot in future years. This is very bullish for oil and other real assets. Furthermore, once we consider the stronger demand picture coupled with constrained supply, oil is likely headed notably higher from here. I expect that we can see oil prices in the $70-80 range by the end of this year, and possibly in the $100 plus range sometime in 2022.</p>\n<p><b>Some Companies We Like:</b></p>\n<p><b>Exxon (XOM)</b></p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6263e8806d6b286e4f50d8ac3b5e76aa\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"676\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">Exxon is one of the best and most stable names in the business. The stock can probably use a mild pullback, but the overall uptrend is very bullish. We like Exxon for its stability, and very strong profitability. The stock trades at 16 times consensus 2022 P/E estimates, the company is projected to deliver revenue growth of about 24% this year and 12% next year, and Exxon pays out a very healthy 7.2% dividend.</p>\n<p><b>BP p.l.c. (BP)</b></p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9d11b425b6b41a0a86b131a474ba760e\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"676\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">BP is another oil major that we like. We see that the stock was likely building a base in recent sessions before making a notable move higher yesterday. This company's earnings may not be as stable as Exxon's, but it is cheap. BP trades at only around 8.8 times its 2022 consensus EPS estimates, is projected to grow revenues by around 30% this year and roughly 10% next year, and pays out a dividend of around 6%.</p>\n<p><b>Schlumberger (SLB)</b></p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d7bdf8e22afad7d5215be0ad8e817c85\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"676\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">SLB also has a strong looking chart, and this is one of our favorite oil services providers. This industry leader trades at about 17.5 times next year's consensus EPS estimates, is expected to grow revenues by about 12% next year, and pays out a dividend of about 2%. While the dividend is not high now it is likely to grow as the company becomes more profitable going forward.</p>\n<p><b>Valero (VLO)</b></p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/64f2f57846c29ac4775129d838b4f379\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"676\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">VLO is a refinery name that we like. The chart is also very bullish here. VLO trades at about 14 times 2022 consensus EPS estimates, is projected to grow revenues by around 15% next year, and pays out a dividend of over 6%.</p>\n<p><b>Lukoil (OTCPK:LUKOY)</b></p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/03f825d5988b67a23ad0d7f8e11c9516\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"676\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">Lukoil is a Russian oil giant. This company is extremely profitable and is quite cheap right now. Lukoil trades at only around 10 times next year's EPS estimates, and pays out a dividend of about 7%.</p>","source":"seekingalpha","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why Oil Is Likely Headed Much Higher From Here</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy Oil Is Likely Headed Much Higher From Here\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-02-10 16:27 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4404609-why-oil-is-likely-headed-much-higher><strong>seekingalpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Summary\n\nOil's supply demand dynamic illustrates that higher prices are probable.\nOPEC+ nations led by Russia and Saudi Arabia are likely to continue to create artificial supply constraints in the ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4404609-why-oil-is-likely-headed-much-higher\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"LUKOY":"PJSC Lukoil","XOM":"埃克森美孚","VLO":"瓦莱罗能源","SLB":"斯伦贝谢","BP":"英国石油"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4404609-why-oil-is-likely-headed-much-higher","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5a36db9d73b4222bc376d24ccc48c8a4","article_id":"1184359000","content_text":"Summary\n\nOil's supply demand dynamic illustrates that higher prices are probable.\nOPEC+ nations led by Russia and Saudi Arabia are likely to continue to create artificial supply constraints in the market.\nOn the other side of the equation, oil demand is likely to rise notably as the coronavirus pandemic eases into H2 and 2022.\nFinally, there is the inflation factor that is likely to enable oil prices to appreciate notably into year-end and next year.\nSome companies that we like going forward.\n\n\nOil - WTI Crude has come a long way since dipping into negative territory during the height of the coronavirus panic. At roughly -$40 a barrel it was quite surreal. Oil stocks were melting, traders were unloading barrels at sub-zero prices, this was an unprecedented time indeed. Nevertheless, fast forward less than 1-year, and oil is closing in on $60 again.\n\nOPEC + oil producers are likely to stick to their production cuts. This should limit the supply of oil coming to market. Moreover, oil demand is likely to rise, as the coronavirus pandemic begins to ease into the second half of this year and into 2022. Furthermore, inflation is likely to rise as well going into year-end and next year. Therefore, oil is likely headed higher from here, possibly into the $70-80 range by the end of this year.\nThe Supply Demand Dynamic\nOil's supply and demand dynamic is likely the single most important driver for oil prices. We saw oil prices crash into negative territory during the height of the coronavirus meltdown. This was in part due to an extremely strong shock to the global demand side of the equation. However, on the other side, while demand fell off a cliff, major oil producers kept pumping, essentially overflowing the market with oil.\n\nHowever, things are much different now. Saudi Arabia and Russia agreed toextend their oil cut outputs. This move puts pressure on other OPEC + nations to comply with their output cuts as well. Also, we are seeing the supply demand dynamic play out in markets, as we see larger than expected declines in U.S. oil inventories in much of therecent economic data.\nAn important factor to consider is that many of the top oil producers in OPEC + like Saudi Arabia, Russia, as well as many other nations are developing, or are essentially third world countries. Thus, oil revenues account for large portions of these countries' GDPs, as well as their budgets. For the sake of stability, and a certain level of prosperity, it is essential to keep oil at \"an acceptable\" price for these nations.\nAn acceptable price is around $55-65, in my view, however, a preferable price is notably higher. Naturally, the higher the price the better (within reason), but a likely lower range for a \"preferable oil price\" is probably around $70-80, and I think the this is where oil is headed by the end of 2021.\nAs the Coronavirus Weakens\nAs the coronavirus loosens its grip on the global economy, oil demand is likely to rise. We see that 2020's demand fell off a bit, but growth seems to have dipped just marginally into negative territory. In fact, I was expecting a larger decline due to the coronavirus pandemic.\n\nNow, the good news is that we are likely to see robust growth this year, and possibly in future years as well. Global oil demand is expected to jump by around 2% this year, illustrating one of the best growth years for oil over the last decade. Also, despite future years' growth declining slightly, I don't expect this to impact price negatively.\nThe Key Word is Inflation Here\nYes inflation, which seems to be rather tame right now is not likely to remain so for long. So, CPI inflation has been running at about1.2-1.4% in recent months.\n\nSome may say \"wow, that is pretty low\". Indeed, it is not very high, but let us put this in context. So, CPI inflation is essentially telling us that a lot of the prices surrounding us are higher now than they were a year ago. In fact, this has been constant throughout the coronavirus pandemic.\nThis is astounding. Portions of global economies were shut down, some parts came to a halt, countless people lost their jobs, GDP fell off a cliff for a while, and all this time we see prices around us increasing. In a \"normal\" scenario we would likely see deflation occur, but we are seeing the opposite instead.\nWell, this is largely due to the Fed and other major central banks around the globe. For the sake of simplicity, let's focus on the Fed, the most influential central bank in the world. Perpetual zero rate policy, multi-trillion dollar backstops and bailouts, coupled with \"QE unlimited\" are causing the Fed's balance sheet to explode. We see that the Fed's balance sheet is nearly 10 times higher than where it was before the financial crisis of 2008, and it has nearly doubled just over the past 18-months alone.\nThis is unprecedented, and it makes 2008's easing look like a blip in comparison to what is going on now. Furthermore, while there were expectations that the Fed could eventually \"normalize\" rates and unload its balance sheet post the 2008 crisis, this was proved to be wishful thinking in late 2018. The economy was not able to function effectively and grow in a rising rate and quantitative tightening/QT environment.\nTherefore, I expect the Fed's balance sheet to continue to expand further from here. Moreover, I don't believe that the Fed will be able to shrink its balance sheet notably in the future, nor will the U.S. economy be able to withstand noticeably higher interest rates going forward.\n\nHere we see the Fed's balance sheet expansion translating into the expansion of the U.S.'s monetary base. The underlying phenomenon creates a perfect storm for inflation to materialize going forward. If we are seeing inflation when we should normally see deflation, what is going to happen when the economy starts to expand notably in the H2 2021, and in 2022?\nI think it is clear, inflation is likely to run quite hot, and I don't think that the Fed is going to be able to implement its usual tools to cool it down any time soon. If easy money stops flowing the economy could stall again. If interest rates tick higher economic activity will slow. Additionally, the enormous debt loads in every segment of the economy, consumer, and government may become unmanageable, and too costly to service.\nThe Bottom Line\nThere really is not much that the Fed can do to cool down inflation going forward without damaging the economy in my view. Thus, inflation is likely to run hot in future years. This is very bullish for oil and other real assets. Furthermore, once we consider the stronger demand picture coupled with constrained supply, oil is likely headed notably higher from here. I expect that we can see oil prices in the $70-80 range by the end of this year, and possibly in the $100 plus range sometime in 2022.\nSome Companies We Like:\nExxon (XOM)\nExxon is one of the best and most stable names in the business. The stock can probably use a mild pullback, but the overall uptrend is very bullish. We like Exxon for its stability, and very strong profitability. The stock trades at 16 times consensus 2022 P/E estimates, the company is projected to deliver revenue growth of about 24% this year and 12% next year, and Exxon pays out a very healthy 7.2% dividend.\nBP p.l.c. (BP)\nBP is another oil major that we like. We see that the stock was likely building a base in recent sessions before making a notable move higher yesterday. This company's earnings may not be as stable as Exxon's, but it is cheap. BP trades at only around 8.8 times its 2022 consensus EPS estimates, is projected to grow revenues by around 30% this year and roughly 10% next year, and pays out a dividend of around 6%.\nSchlumberger (SLB)\nSLB also has a strong looking chart, and this is one of our favorite oil services providers. This industry leader trades at about 17.5 times next year's consensus EPS estimates, is expected to grow revenues by about 12% next year, and pays out a dividend of about 2%. While the dividend is not high now it is likely to grow as the company becomes more profitable going forward.\nValero (VLO)\nVLO is a refinery name that we like. The chart is also very bullish here. VLO trades at about 14 times 2022 consensus EPS estimates, is projected to grow revenues by around 15% next year, and pays out a dividend of over 6%.\nLukoil (OTCPK:LUKOY)\nLukoil is a Russian oil giant. This company is extremely profitable and is quite cheap right now. Lukoil trades at only around 10 times next year's EPS estimates, and pays out a dividend of about 7%.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":184,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":312933451,"gmtCreate":1611987877373,"gmtModify":1704866827614,"author":{"id":"3574935717212940","authorId":"3574935717212940","authorIdStr":"3574935717212940","name":"yak72","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/17a87ff9ca11712b778937c22f667b41","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574935717212940"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"?","listText":"?","text":"?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/312933451","repostId":"2107290824","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2107290824","pubTimestamp":1611906472,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2107290824?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-01-29 15:47","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Elon Musk Tweets In Support Of Dogecoin After Price Grows 420% In A Day","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2107290824","media":"Benzinga","summary":"Tesla Inc (NASDAQ: TSLA) Elon Musk has tweeted a digital magazine cover featuring a dog in apparent ","content":"<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7833d27f98c3899654cca428a2991626\" tg-width=\"600\" tg-height=\"400\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><b>Tesla Inc&nbsp;</b>(NASDAQ: TSLA) Elon Musk&nbsp;has tweeted&nbsp;a digital magazine cover featuring a dog in apparent support of a digital currency Dogecoin.</p><p><b>What Happened:</b>&nbsp;Dogecoin, a digital currency that was launched as a joke, has surpassed all-time high today, growing by 420.29% in a matter of <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE\">one</a> day, according to a data analytics platform CoinMarketCap. The cryptocurrency is currently traded at&nbsp;$0.03831&nbsp;at the time of publishing.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/46bbb028feddda5c41119b1815263941\" tg-width=\"548\" tg-height=\"677\">Musk’s followers recognized the tweet as an endorsement to the current Dogecoin rally, expressing&nbsp;overwhelming support in the Dogecoin future.</p><p><b>Why It Matters:</b>&nbsp;This is not the first time Elon Musk has expressed his interest in the digital currency.</p><p>In December, Tesla CEO&nbsp;tweeted&nbsp;“One word: Doge” sending the cryptocurrency to a 20% surge.</p><p>Before that, his July&nbsp;tweet&nbsp;caused a 14% spike in Dogecoin price.</p><p>CoinMarketCap Head of Listings, however,&nbsp;in a conversation with Benzinga has warned traders about possible ramifications following a call to buy Dogecoin in a Reddit group that caused the recent price spike.</p><p>\"It bears mentioning that all of this [the spike and the Reddit thread]takes place against a discernible shift in the cultural milieu, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> where WSB has become emblematic of a grassroots Reddit movement that seeks to repudiate the entrenched interests and ossified power structures of WallStreet.</p><p>With his 'Gamestonk' tweet, Elon Musk -- himself the subject of legal entanglements with the establishment (SEC) and erstwhile self-proclaimed Dogecoin CEO -- has not only added rocket fuel to ignite Doge's price action on a SpaceX mission to the moon, but also a offered a familiar face for 'Robinhood traders' to coalesce around.”</p>","source":"yahoofinance","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Elon Musk Tweets In Support Of Dogecoin After Price Grows 420% In A Day</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nElon Musk Tweets In Support Of Dogecoin After Price Grows 420% In A Day\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-01-29 15:47 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/elon-musk-tweets-support-dogecoin-015609684.html><strong>Benzinga</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Tesla Inc (NASDAQ: TSLA) Elon Musk has tweeted a digital magazine cover featuring a dog in apparent support of a digital currency Dogecoin.What Happened: Dogecoin, a digital currency that was launched...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/elon-musk-tweets-support-dogecoin-015609684.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7833d27f98c3899654cca428a2991626","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/elon-musk-tweets-support-dogecoin-015609684.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5f26f4a48f9cb3e29be4d71d3ba8c038","article_id":"2107290824","content_text":"Tesla Inc (NASDAQ: TSLA) Elon Musk has tweeted a digital magazine cover featuring a dog in apparent support of a digital currency Dogecoin.What Happened: Dogecoin, a digital currency that was launched as a joke, has surpassed all-time high today, growing by 420.29% in a matter of one day, according to a data analytics platform CoinMarketCap. The cryptocurrency is currently traded at $0.03831 at the time of publishing.Musk’s followers recognized the tweet as an endorsement to the current Dogecoin rally, expressing overwhelming support in the Dogecoin future.Why It Matters: This is not the first time Elon Musk has expressed his interest in the digital currency.In December, Tesla CEO tweeted “One word: Doge” sending the cryptocurrency to a 20% surge.Before that, his July tweet caused a 14% spike in Dogecoin price.CoinMarketCap Head of Listings, however, in a conversation with Benzinga has warned traders about possible ramifications following a call to buy Dogecoin in a Reddit group that caused the recent price spike.\"It bears mentioning that all of this [the spike and the Reddit thread]takes place against a discernible shift in the cultural milieu, one where WSB has become emblematic of a grassroots Reddit movement that seeks to repudiate the entrenched interests and ossified power structures of WallStreet.With his 'Gamestonk' tweet, Elon Musk -- himself the subject of legal entanglements with the establishment (SEC) and erstwhile self-proclaimed Dogecoin CEO -- has not only added rocket fuel to ignite Doge's price action on a SpaceX mission to the moon, but also a offered a familiar face for 'Robinhood traders' to coalesce around.”","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":455,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[{"author":{"id":"3527667803686145","authorId":"3527667803686145","authorIdStr":"3527667803686145","name":"社区成长助手","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2b7c7106b5c0c8b0037faa67439d898f","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3527667803686145"},"content":"Finally, when you first post [compare heart] [compare heart] post, you can get more exposure by related stocks or related topics. If you want to create high-quality articles, please checkGuidelines for Tiger Community Creation","text":"Finally, when you first post [compare heart] [compare heart] post, you can get more exposure by related stocks or related topics. If you want to create high-quality articles, please checkGuidelines for Tiger Community Creation","html":"Finally, when you first post [compare heart] [compare heart] post, you can get more exposure by related stocks or related topics. If you want to create high-quality articles, please checkGuidelines for Tiger Community Creation"}],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":314645322,"gmtCreate":1612348567766,"gmtModify":1704870007244,"author":{"id":"3574935717212940","authorId":"3574935717212940","authorIdStr":"3574935717212940","name":"yak72","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/17a87ff9ca11712b778937c22f667b41","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574935717212940"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hmm","listText":"Hmm","text":"Hmm","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/314645322","repostId":"2108570747","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2108570747","pubTimestamp":1612344121,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2108570747?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-02-03 17:22","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Market News: Ants reach overhaul agreement with regulators","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2108570747","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"(Bloomberg) -- Ant Group Co. and Chinese regulators have agreed on a restructuring plan that will tu","content":"<p>(Bloomberg) -- Ant Group Co. and Chinese regulators have agreed on a restructuring plan that will turn Jack Ma’s fintech giant into a financial holding company, making it subject to capital requirements similar to those for banks.</p>\n<p>The plan calls for putting all of Ant’s businesses into the holding company, including its technology offerings in areas like blockchain and food delivery, people familiar with the matter said. One of Ant’s early proposals to regulators had envisioned putting only financial operations into the new structure.</p>\n<p>An official announcement on the overhaul could come before the start of China’s Lunar New Year holiday next week, the people said, asking not to be identified discussing private information. Alibaba Group Holding Ltd., which owns about a third of Ant, erased losses in Hong Kong trading on Wednesday after Bloomberg reported the agreement. The stock closed with a 0.4% gain.</p>\n<p>Ant’s restructuring plan marks the first big step in what’s expected to be a lengthy overhaul process, as regulators draw up detailed capital requirements and other guidelines for companies that span multiple financial business lines.</p>\n<p>China only introduced its framework for financial holding companies in September and many of the specifics are still being ironed out. While the rules will eventually provide more regulatory clarity for Ant, they’ll almost certainly force the company to slow the torrid pace of expansion that has made it China’s dominant fintech player and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE\">one</a> of the world’s most valuable startups.</p>\n<p>Ant is still exploring possibilities to revive its initial public offering, which was abruptly halted by regulators in November, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> person familiar with the matter said. But given the financial holding company framework is so new, it’s unclear how long it might take for authorities to sign off a listing.</p>\n<p>Ant declined to comment. The People’s Bank of China, which oversees financial holding companies, didn’t immediately respond to a faxed request for comment.</p>\n<p>Ant’s restructuring is part of a broader government campaign to increase supervision of the financial and technology sectors. Regulators have in recent months targeted everything from health-care crowdfunding to consumer lending. In January, they proposed measures to curb market concentration in online payments, where Ant and Tencent Holdings Ltd. are the biggest players.</p>\n<p>The clampdown has fueled intense speculation over the status of Ma, who co-founded both Ant and Alibaba. The e-commerce giant has also faced increased government scrutiny in recent months, becoming the target of an antitrust investigation in December.</p>\n<p>Ma’s appearance in a live-streamed video conference in January -- after several months out of public view -- has helped quell talk of worst-case scenarios for his business empire. Still, plenty of uncertainty remains: even after Wednesday’s gain, Alibaba’s Hong Kong shares are trading about 15% below their record high in October.</p>\n<p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Market News: Ants reach overhaul agreement with regulators</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nMarket News: Ants reach overhaul agreement with regulators\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-02-03 17:22 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/ant-reaches-agreement-china-regulators-083830972.html><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>(Bloomberg) -- Ant Group Co. and Chinese regulators have agreed on a restructuring plan that will turn Jack Ma’s fintech giant into a financial holding company, making it subject to capital ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/ant-reaches-agreement-china-regulators-083830972.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9a353fd7027b404fd0462b771be77661","relate_stocks":{"BABA":"阿里巴巴","09988":"阿里巴巴-W"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/ant-reaches-agreement-china-regulators-083830972.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2108570747","content_text":"(Bloomberg) -- Ant Group Co. and Chinese regulators have agreed on a restructuring plan that will turn Jack Ma’s fintech giant into a financial holding company, making it subject to capital requirements similar to those for banks.\nThe plan calls for putting all of Ant’s businesses into the holding company, including its technology offerings in areas like blockchain and food delivery, people familiar with the matter said. One of Ant’s early proposals to regulators had envisioned putting only financial operations into the new structure.\nAn official announcement on the overhaul could come before the start of China’s Lunar New Year holiday next week, the people said, asking not to be identified discussing private information. Alibaba Group Holding Ltd., which owns about a third of Ant, erased losses in Hong Kong trading on Wednesday after Bloomberg reported the agreement. The stock closed with a 0.4% gain.\nAnt’s restructuring plan marks the first big step in what’s expected to be a lengthy overhaul process, as regulators draw up detailed capital requirements and other guidelines for companies that span multiple financial business lines.\nChina only introduced its framework for financial holding companies in September and many of the specifics are still being ironed out. While the rules will eventually provide more regulatory clarity for Ant, they’ll almost certainly force the company to slow the torrid pace of expansion that has made it China’s dominant fintech player and one of the world’s most valuable startups.\nAnt is still exploring possibilities to revive its initial public offering, which was abruptly halted by regulators in November, one person familiar with the matter said. But given the financial holding company framework is so new, it’s unclear how long it might take for authorities to sign off a listing.\nAnt declined to comment. The People’s Bank of China, which oversees financial holding companies, didn’t immediately respond to a faxed request for comment.\nAnt’s restructuring is part of a broader government campaign to increase supervision of the financial and technology sectors. Regulators have in recent months targeted everything from health-care crowdfunding to consumer lending. In January, they proposed measures to curb market concentration in online payments, where Ant and Tencent Holdings Ltd. are the biggest players.\nThe clampdown has fueled intense speculation over the status of Ma, who co-founded both Ant and Alibaba. The e-commerce giant has also faced increased government scrutiny in recent months, becoming the target of an antitrust investigation in December.\nMa’s appearance in a live-streamed video conference in January -- after several months out of public view -- has helped quell talk of worst-case scenarios for his business empire. Still, plenty of uncertainty remains: even after Wednesday’s gain, Alibaba’s Hong Kong shares are trading about 15% below their record high in October.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":323,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":314119153,"gmtCreate":1612317983172,"gmtModify":1704869665247,"author":{"id":"3574935717212940","authorId":"3574935717212940","authorIdStr":"3574935717212940","name":"yak72","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/17a87ff9ca11712b778937c22f667b41","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574935717212940"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Northbound?&nbsp;","listText":"Northbound?&nbsp;","text":"Northbound?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/314119153","repostId":"1109079107","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1109079107","pubTimestamp":1612257440,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1109079107?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-02-02 17:17","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Oil company Baker Hughes is ‘cautiously optimistic’ on the outlook for energy demand","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1109079107","media":"cnbc","summary":"KEY POINTSOil services firm Baker Hughes sees energy demand recovering in the second half of 2021, c","content":"<div>\n<p>KEY POINTSOil services firm Baker Hughes sees energy demand recovering in the second half of 2021, chief executive Lorenzo Simonelli said.He noted that some countries are still in coronavirus-related ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/02/02/oil-company-baker-hughes-is-cautiously-optimistic-on-energy-outlook.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"cnbc_highlight","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Oil company Baker Hughes is ‘cautiously optimistic’ on the outlook for energy demand</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nOil company Baker Hughes is ‘cautiously optimistic’ on the outlook for energy demand\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-02-02 17:17 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.cnbc.com/2021/02/02/oil-company-baker-hughes-is-cautiously-optimistic-on-energy-outlook.html><strong>cnbc</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>KEY POINTSOil services firm Baker Hughes sees energy demand recovering in the second half of 2021, chief executive Lorenzo Simonelli said.He noted that some countries are still in coronavirus-related ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/02/02/oil-company-baker-hughes-is-cautiously-optimistic-on-energy-outlook.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76824cd4c5b97eaacdaab63d96995a28","relate_stocks":{"BKR":"贝克休斯"},"source_url":"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/02/02/oil-company-baker-hughes-is-cautiously-optimistic-on-energy-outlook.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/72bb72e1b84c09fca865c6dcb1bbcd16","article_id":"1109079107","content_text":"KEY POINTSOil services firm Baker Hughes sees energy demand recovering in the second half of 2021, chief executive Lorenzo Simonelli said.He noted that some countries are still in coronavirus-related lockdowns, which can weigh on fuel sales in the first part of the year.Oil services firmBaker Hughessees energy demand recovering in the second half of 2021, chief executive Lorenzo Simonelli said this week.“We are cautiously optimistic,” he told CNBC’s Steve Sedgwick on Monday.He noted that some countries are still in coronavirus-related lockdowns, which decimated demand in 2020 and can weigh on fuel sales in the first part of the year.However, he expects demand to start recovering in the second half of the year, due to the vaccine rollout and improving economic situation.The chief executive’s views were in line with OPEC’s January report on the oil market, which saidvaccinations provide some “upside optimism,” and that its 2021 forecasts “assume a healthy recovery in economic activities.”The alliance expects global oil demand to increase by 5.9 million barrels per day to an average of 95.9 million bpd.Meanwhile, the International Energy Agencypredicts that world oil demand will recover to 96.6 million bdp this year.It lowered its forecast slightly citing surging Covid cases and fresh lockdowns.While vaccines put fundamentals on a stronger growth trajectory, it will take more time for demand to fully recover, the IEA said.Opportunities in oil investmentSimonelli said there would be “pockets of opportunity” for investment as the recovery takes place.“It’s going to be different in different locations geographically,” he said. “As we look at the lower cost basins, you look at the Middle East, that’s where you’ll see some of the production increases.”Brazil and Norway could also increase production in the second half of 2021, he added.U.S. shale producers, however, are likely to be “subdued,” he said. “There’s a lot of capital discipline, [and] obviously we’re undergoing an energy transition as well.”He said North America historically would increase volumes quickly, but that could change this time.“We think this will be different, just given the capital discipline and the focus that producers are having on … returns and cash flows and constraining some of the capital inflows,” he said.U.S. West Texas Intermediate futures were up 0.99% at $54.08 on Tuesday afternoon in Asia, while international benchmark Brent crude futures rose 0.89% to trade at $56.85.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":250,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":380056419,"gmtCreate":1612496197131,"gmtModify":1704871985890,"author":{"id":"3574935717212940","authorId":"3574935717212940","authorIdStr":"3574935717212940","name":"yak72","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/17a87ff9ca11712b778937c22f667b41","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574935717212940"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Nice","listText":"Nice","text":"Nice","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/380056419","repostId":"2109343740","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":190,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":312589577,"gmtCreate":1612167304699,"gmtModify":1704867607218,"author":{"id":"3574935717212940","authorId":"3574935717212940","authorIdStr":"3574935717212940","name":"yak72","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/17a87ff9ca11712b778937c22f667b41","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574935717212940"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ttm","listText":"Ttm","text":"Ttm","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/312589577","repostId":"1183625716","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1183625716","pubTimestamp":1612163292,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1183625716?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-02-01 15:08","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why regulators shouldn’t get trigger-happy in trying to rein in GameStop’s stock mania","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1183625716","media":"marketwatch","summary":"The meteoric rise in videogame-retailer GameStop’s stock price from a few dollars to more than $300 ","content":"<p>The meteoric rise in videogame-retailer GameStop’s stock price from a few dollars to more than $300 in a couple of weeks, swelling its market value to about $25 billion, has made the company and mania surrounding it a household name.</p>\n<p>Trading in shares of the beleaguered retailer has gone through the roof.&nbsp; Short interest — bets against the company — exceeds the total shares outstanding, and call and put option volume has been in the tens of millions. Those statistics are an order of magnitude greater than for similar stocks.</p>\n<p>Investors, including those on Reddit’s WallStreetBets forum and other social media, have been buying GameStopGME,+67.87%shares, causing a short squeeze for those betting against the company, in turn forcing the short sellers to cover their positions. As a result, that’s driving the shares higher. While the saga is still unfolding, we wouldn’t be surprised that when the music stops, GameStop’s share price would return to terrestrial levels.</p>\n<p>The dramatic turn of events has led many to speculate the underlying causes and proffer regulatory remedies. Some draw a parallel to pump-and-dump schemes that seek to manipulate share prices. However, pump-and-dump schemes are already illegal, which might shift attention toward other regulatory avenues.</p>\n<p>Three come to mind: payment for order flow, a transaction tax and enhanced financial literacy education.</p>\n<p>Payment for order flow</p>\n<p>Payment for order flow (here’s an SEC study) transfers “some of the trading profits from market making to the brokers that route customer orders to specialists for execution.”</p>\n<p>This practice has experienced renewed scrutiny as a central source of revenue for retail brokerage platforms such as Robinhood, Charles SchwabSCHW,-4.09%and E*Trade. The brokers’ business model offers zero-cost trades to attract business from individual and institutional clients in exchange for the order flow payments they receive from market makers such as Citadel.</p>\n<p>Detractors argue that zero-cost trades induce excessive trading. While that might be true, it’s naïve to believe that it remotely explains the price movement witnessed in GameStop. Moreover, the lower cost of trading in all stocks and better execution have democratized investors’ access to securities markets without adverse effects on securities market. In fact, greater investor participation and trading enhance price transparency and liquidity — both desirable tenets of securities markets. Making order flow payments verboten will deprive markets of these benefits.</p>\n<p>Transaction tax</p>\n<p>Clearly, trading volume in GameStop shares is many times its historical average. This anecdotal evidence of high trading volume and high volatility might revive the financial transaction tax proposal.</p>\n<p>A financial transaction tax is typically premised on notions that trading fuels volatility, and trading, especially high-frequency trading, does not serve a useful social purpose.&nbsp;An alternative explanation is that economic news and uncertainty contribute to trading and price volatility.</p>\n<p>As the COVID-19 pandemic hit the U.S. in March 2020, the adverse news and high degree of uncertainty about U.S. economic prospects manifested in a sharp fall in asset prices and the VIX rising almost instantaneously to a historic high. Simultaneously, trading volume doubled. From April 2020, asset prices rose and VIX dropped rapidly with federal stimulus, accommodative monetary policies and Treasury fiscal support to businesses.</p>\n<p>However, trading volume has remained elevated, which contradicts the notion that trading fuels market volatility. A financial transaction tax would discourage trading, for sure, but it is unlikely to attenuate volatility.&nbsp;More importantly, price discovery might be sacrificed as a result of less trading, which would adversely affect efficient capital allocation.</p>\n<p>Finally, financial transaction taxes are also unlikely to be effective in curbing episodes such as the sudden rise of GameStop.</p>\n<p>Financial literacy</p>\n<p>A baseline level of education is a prerequisite for an individual investor to trade in options. Enhanced financial literacy education might be a promising approach to discipline investor exuberance. Still, more information is needed to determine its efficacy. This may come in the form of research on the links between education and investor behavior.</p>\n<p>Rather than regulation directly designed to curb trading, experimentation in financial markets might hold greater promise in calibrating the form of effective financial literacy education.</p>\n<p>The limits of arbitrage capital</p>\n<p>The sudden, sharp rise in GameStop highlights the clout of individual investors acting in concert. Their collective buying power has propelled the stock to loftier levels, which virtually everyone believes to be unhinged from underlying economic fundamentals.</p>\n<p>Typically, active investors, including short sellers, correct the price by selling the stock.&nbsp;However, the GameStop episode has exposed the limits of arbitrage capital that might otherwise counter the tsunami of buying pressure as a result of coordinated buying by a huge number of investors.&nbsp;A few hundred million to a few billion dollars of capital from short sellers has been too little so far.</p>\n<p>Moreover, they could not marshal additional capital to meet margin calls as the stock price rose. Worse yet, buying to close out their loss positions only resulted in additional buying pressure or the short-squeeze effect.</p>\n<p>The bottom line is, the efficient functioning of the stock market requires substantial arbitrage capital to correct mispricing that might result from coordinated buying motivated to exact a revenge of what individual investors perceive as a market rigged by short sellers. Unfortunately, in this environment of demonization of short sellers, it’s hard to imagine additional capital will flow to stem what seems like an irrational stock price rise in GameStop.</p>\n<p>Of course, only time will tell whether the price rise is rational or that it exposes the lack of adequate arbitrage capital.&nbsp;In the meantime, it behooves to resist being trigger-happy with regulation.</p>\n<p><i>SP Kothari&nbsp;is a professor at MIT Sloan School of Management and former chief economist at the Securities and Exchange Commission from 2019-2021.&nbsp;Eric So&nbsp;is a professor at MIT Sloan School of Management.</i></p>","source":"lsy1603348471595","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why regulators shouldn’t get trigger-happy in trying to rein in GameStop’s stock mania</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy regulators shouldn’t get trigger-happy in trying to rein in GameStop’s stock mania\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-02-01 15:08 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.marketwatch.com/story/why-regulators-shouldnt-get-trigger-happy-in-trying-to-rein-in-gamestops-stock-mania-11611939882?mod=home-page><strong>marketwatch</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The meteoric rise in videogame-retailer GameStop’s stock price from a few dollars to more than $300 in a couple of weeks, swelling its market value to about $25 billion, has made the company and mania...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/why-regulators-shouldnt-get-trigger-happy-in-trying-to-rein-in-gamestops-stock-mania-11611939882?mod=home-page\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b1fdaab121d904fee30d8fe32e39819a","relate_stocks":{"GME":"游戏驿站"},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/why-regulators-shouldnt-get-trigger-happy-in-trying-to-rein-in-gamestops-stock-mania-11611939882?mod=home-page","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1183625716","content_text":"The meteoric rise in videogame-retailer GameStop’s stock price from a few dollars to more than $300 in a couple of weeks, swelling its market value to about $25 billion, has made the company and mania surrounding it a household name.\nTrading in shares of the beleaguered retailer has gone through the roof.  Short interest — bets against the company — exceeds the total shares outstanding, and call and put option volume has been in the tens of millions. Those statistics are an order of magnitude greater than for similar stocks.\nInvestors, including those on Reddit’s WallStreetBets forum and other social media, have been buying GameStopGME,+67.87%shares, causing a short squeeze for those betting against the company, in turn forcing the short sellers to cover their positions. As a result, that’s driving the shares higher. While the saga is still unfolding, we wouldn’t be surprised that when the music stops, GameStop’s share price would return to terrestrial levels.\nThe dramatic turn of events has led many to speculate the underlying causes and proffer regulatory remedies. Some draw a parallel to pump-and-dump schemes that seek to manipulate share prices. However, pump-and-dump schemes are already illegal, which might shift attention toward other regulatory avenues.\nThree come to mind: payment for order flow, a transaction tax and enhanced financial literacy education.\nPayment for order flow\nPayment for order flow (here’s an SEC study) transfers “some of the trading profits from market making to the brokers that route customer orders to specialists for execution.”\nThis practice has experienced renewed scrutiny as a central source of revenue for retail brokerage platforms such as Robinhood, Charles SchwabSCHW,-4.09%and E*Trade. The brokers’ business model offers zero-cost trades to attract business from individual and institutional clients in exchange for the order flow payments they receive from market makers such as Citadel.\nDetractors argue that zero-cost trades induce excessive trading. While that might be true, it’s naïve to believe that it remotely explains the price movement witnessed in GameStop. Moreover, the lower cost of trading in all stocks and better execution have democratized investors’ access to securities markets without adverse effects on securities market. In fact, greater investor participation and trading enhance price transparency and liquidity — both desirable tenets of securities markets. Making order flow payments verboten will deprive markets of these benefits.\nTransaction tax\nClearly, trading volume in GameStop shares is many times its historical average. This anecdotal evidence of high trading volume and high volatility might revive the financial transaction tax proposal.\nA financial transaction tax is typically premised on notions that trading fuels volatility, and trading, especially high-frequency trading, does not serve a useful social purpose. An alternative explanation is that economic news and uncertainty contribute to trading and price volatility.\nAs the COVID-19 pandemic hit the U.S. in March 2020, the adverse news and high degree of uncertainty about U.S. economic prospects manifested in a sharp fall in asset prices and the VIX rising almost instantaneously to a historic high. Simultaneously, trading volume doubled. From April 2020, asset prices rose and VIX dropped rapidly with federal stimulus, accommodative monetary policies and Treasury fiscal support to businesses.\nHowever, trading volume has remained elevated, which contradicts the notion that trading fuels market volatility. A financial transaction tax would discourage trading, for sure, but it is unlikely to attenuate volatility. More importantly, price discovery might be sacrificed as a result of less trading, which would adversely affect efficient capital allocation.\nFinally, financial transaction taxes are also unlikely to be effective in curbing episodes such as the sudden rise of GameStop.\nFinancial literacy\nA baseline level of education is a prerequisite for an individual investor to trade in options. Enhanced financial literacy education might be a promising approach to discipline investor exuberance. Still, more information is needed to determine its efficacy. This may come in the form of research on the links between education and investor behavior.\nRather than regulation directly designed to curb trading, experimentation in financial markets might hold greater promise in calibrating the form of effective financial literacy education.\nThe limits of arbitrage capital\nThe sudden, sharp rise in GameStop highlights the clout of individual investors acting in concert. Their collective buying power has propelled the stock to loftier levels, which virtually everyone believes to be unhinged from underlying economic fundamentals.\nTypically, active investors, including short sellers, correct the price by selling the stock. However, the GameStop episode has exposed the limits of arbitrage capital that might otherwise counter the tsunami of buying pressure as a result of coordinated buying by a huge number of investors. A few hundred million to a few billion dollars of capital from short sellers has been too little so far.\nMoreover, they could not marshal additional capital to meet margin calls as the stock price rose. Worse yet, buying to close out their loss positions only resulted in additional buying pressure or the short-squeeze effect.\nThe bottom line is, the efficient functioning of the stock market requires substantial arbitrage capital to correct mispricing that might result from coordinated buying motivated to exact a revenge of what individual investors perceive as a market rigged by short sellers. Unfortunately, in this environment of demonization of short sellers, it’s hard to imagine additional capital will flow to stem what seems like an irrational stock price rise in GameStop.\nOf course, only time will tell whether the price rise is rational or that it exposes the lack of adequate arbitrage capital. In the meantime, it behooves to resist being trigger-happy with regulation.\nSP Kothari is a professor at MIT Sloan School of Management and former chief economist at the Securities and Exchange Commission from 2019-2021. Eric So is a professor at MIT Sloan School of Management.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":214,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}