Faizztikuss personal page - To The Moon

Faizztikuss

Faizztikuss

No personal profile

22Follow

1Followers

0Topic

0Badge

2021-06-19

??

Twitter's India woes worsen as police summon chief over viral video

2021-06-18

??

As e-commerce sales proliferate, Amazon holds on to top online retail spot

2021-03-23

Lets buy RLX

2021-03-22

Nice

Hong Kong stocks close lower on Europe lockdowns, lira plunge

2021-03-22

Interesting

The Market Isn’t Fighting the Fed. What That Means for Stocks.

2021-03-22

Nice

These beaten-down tech stocks may be worth their high valuations, two traders say

2021-03-22

Nice

U.S. senators press Biden to set end date for gas-powered car sales

2021-03-22

Wow

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2021-03-22

Solid

Barkin: Straightforward decision for Fed to keep "foot on the gas"

2021-03-22

Wow

Australia's Crown Resorts receives $6.2 billion proposal from Blackstone

2021-03-20

Wow

Fed Disappoints Market, Lets SLR Relief Expire: What Happens Next

2021-03-20

??

@爱发红包的虎妞:知乎來嘍~快分享你剛換上的頭像框！

2021-03-20

Gamestop keep increasing and decreasing

2021-03-19

Will wait for Nio to drop so I can buy more

2021-03-19

Nio please go up ?

2021-03-15

Buy Nio stocks for long-term ?

2021-03-11

Stonks

Why AMC Entertainment Stock Popped (Again) Before Earnings

2021-03-11

Stonks

Go to Tiger App to see more news

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"userPageInfo":{"id":"3574982978889356","uuid":"3574982978889356","gmtCreate":1611888955509,"gmtModify":1611889857424,"name":"Faizztikuss","pinyin":"faizztikuss","introduction":"","introductionEn":null,"signature":"","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d997b1472c0a74a79e4dcc956ed68e44","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":1,"headSize":22,"tweetSize":18,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":2,"name":"无畏虎","nameTw":"無畏虎","represent":"初生牛犊","factor":"发布3条非转发主帖,1条获得他人回复或点赞","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":"success","userBadges":[{"badgeId":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493-2","templateUuid":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493","name":"Senior Tiger","description":"Join the tiger community for 1000 days","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0063fb68ea29c9ae6858c58630e182d5","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/96c699a93be4214d4b49aea6a5a5d1a4","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/35b0e542a9ff77046ed69ef602bc105d","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.10.27","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789-1","templateUuid":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789","name":"Knowledgeable Investor","description":"Traded more than 10 stocks","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e74cc24115c4fbae6154ec1b1041bf47","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d48265cbfd97c57f9048db29f22227b0","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76c6d6898b073c77e1c537ebe9ac1c57","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1102},{"badgeId":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84-1","templateUuid":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84","name":"Real Trader","description":"Completed a transaction","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100},{"badgeId":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be-1","templateUuid":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be","name":"Elite Trader","description":"Total number of securities or futures transactions reached 30","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ab0f87127c854ce3191a752d57b46edc","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c9835ce48b8c8743566d344ac7a7ba8c","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76754b53ce7a90019f132c1d2fbc698f","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":"60.50%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":4,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":null,"starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"post","tweets":[{"id":162383009,"gmtCreate":1624034586801,"gmtModify":1703827356770,"author":{"id":"3574982978889356","authorId":"3574982978889356","name":"Faizztikuss","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d997b1472c0a74a79e4dcc956ed68e44","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574982978889356","authorIdStr":"3574982978889356"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"??","listText":"??","text":"??","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/162383009","repostId":"2144713727","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2144713727","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1624004460,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2144713727?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-18 16:21","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Twitter's India woes worsen as police summon chief over viral video","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2144713727","media":"Reuters","summary":"LUCKNOW, India June 18 (Reuters) - Police in India have summoned Twitter's top official in the count","content":"<p>LUCKNOW, India June 18 (Reuters) - Police in India have summoned Twitter's top official in the country to answer allegations that the U.S. firm failed to stop the spread of a video that allegedly incited \"hate and enmity\" between Hindu and Muslim communities.</p>\n<p>An official police notice, seen by Reuters, showed a case had been registered in Ghaziabad in northern Uttar Pradesh state over a video of a few men, apparently Hindu, beating an elderly man believed to be a Muslim and cutting his beard.</p>\n<p>The police report names Twitter Inc , its local unit and seven others for their alleged roles in disseminating a video that was deemed insulting to religious beliefs and causing</p>\n<p>public mischief in a state with a long, bloody history of communal violence.</p>\n<p>The controversy comes just as India's federal government is locking horns with Twitter over non-compliance with new IT rules, which have raised doubts whether the platform would continue to enjoy protection against legal liability for user-generated content. The new rules became effective in late May.</p>\n<p>In a notice dated Thursday, Ghaziabad police wrote to Twitter India head Manish Maheshwari to appear before officials within seven days of the receipt of the summons.</p>\n<p>\"Some people used their Twitter handles to spread hatred and enmity in the society and Twitter did not take cognisance,\" said the notice, which was reviewed by Reuters.</p>\n<p>\"Writings and works which promoted enmity and affected harmony between different communities in the country and the state were encouraged and such anti-society messages were allowed to go viral.\"</p>\n<p>Twitter declined to comment, and Maheshwari did not respond to a request for comment.</p>\n<p>IT minister Ravi Shankar Prasad lashed out at Twitter this week for the Ghaziabad incident, saying its failure to act was \"perplexing.\"</p>\n<p>NO SAFE HARBOUR</p>\n<p>Prasad has said Twitter has not complied with a new set of government rules that required them to appoint new compliance officers by May 26.</p>\n<p>The rules state that in case of non-compliance, protection that companies enjoy related to any liability against user generated content \"shall not be applicable\" and companies \"shall be liable for punishment under any law.\"</p>\n<p>\"The moment Twitter was non-complaint, the safe harbour protection was automatically not available,\" said Shlok Chandra,</p>\n<p>a New Delhi-based lawyer who represents the federal government in various cases. \"The position is very clear.\"</p>\n<p>Some free speech activists and lawyers, however, disagree.</p>\n<p>\"The Central Government neither has the power to bestow, nor the power to \"withdraw\" the exemption from liability...The determination of the question whether Twitter is entitled to seek exemption from liability is solely within the domain of the Courts,\" Delhi-based Ira Law firm said in a LinkedIn post this month.</p>\n<p>Three special rapporteurs appointed by a top United Nations human rights body last week urged India to review the new IT rules, saying their broadened scope did not conform with international human rights norms and could threaten digital rights.</p>\n<p>To comply with India's new IT rules, companies such as Twitter needed to appoint a chief compliance officer, a nodal officer and a resident grievance officer. But LinkedIn job postings show all three positions were currently open at Twitter.</p>\n<p>The social media giant has however retained an interim chief compliance officer, it said this week, adding that it was making all efforts to adhere to the new IT rules.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Twitter's India woes worsen as police summon chief over viral video</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTwitter's India woes worsen as police summon chief over viral video\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-06-18 16:21</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>LUCKNOW, India June 18 (Reuters) - Police in India have summoned Twitter's top official in the country to answer allegations that the U.S. firm failed to stop the spread of a video that allegedly incited \"hate and enmity\" between Hindu and Muslim communities.</p>\n<p>An official police notice, seen by Reuters, showed a case had been registered in Ghaziabad in northern Uttar Pradesh state over a video of a few men, apparently Hindu, beating an elderly man believed to be a Muslim and cutting his beard.</p>\n<p>The police report names Twitter Inc , its local unit and seven others for their alleged roles in disseminating a video that was deemed insulting to religious beliefs and causing</p>\n<p>public mischief in a state with a long, bloody history of communal violence.</p>\n<p>The controversy comes just as India's federal government is locking horns with Twitter over non-compliance with new IT rules, which have raised doubts whether the platform would continue to enjoy protection against legal liability for user-generated content. The new rules became effective in late May.</p>\n<p>In a notice dated Thursday, Ghaziabad police wrote to Twitter India head Manish Maheshwari to appear before officials within seven days of the receipt of the summons.</p>\n<p>\"Some people used their Twitter handles to spread hatred and enmity in the society and Twitter did not take cognisance,\" said the notice, which was reviewed by Reuters.</p>\n<p>\"Writings and works which promoted enmity and affected harmony between different communities in the country and the state were encouraged and such anti-society messages were allowed to go viral.\"</p>\n<p>Twitter declined to comment, and Maheshwari did not respond to a request for comment.</p>\n<p>IT minister Ravi Shankar Prasad lashed out at Twitter this week for the Ghaziabad incident, saying its failure to act was \"perplexing.\"</p>\n<p>NO SAFE HARBOUR</p>\n<p>Prasad has said Twitter has not complied with a new set of government rules that required them to appoint new compliance officers by May 26.</p>\n<p>The rules state that in case of non-compliance, protection that companies enjoy related to any liability against user generated content \"shall not be applicable\" and companies \"shall be liable for punishment under any law.\"</p>\n<p>\"The moment Twitter was non-complaint, the safe harbour protection was automatically not available,\" said Shlok Chandra,</p>\n<p>a New Delhi-based lawyer who represents the federal government in various cases. \"The position is very clear.\"</p>\n<p>Some free speech activists and lawyers, however, disagree.</p>\n<p>\"The Central Government neither has the power to bestow, nor the power to \"withdraw\" the exemption from liability...The determination of the question whether Twitter is entitled to seek exemption from liability is solely within the domain of the Courts,\" Delhi-based Ira Law firm said in a LinkedIn post this month.</p>\n<p>Three special rapporteurs appointed by a top United Nations human rights body last week urged India to review the new IT rules, saying their broadened scope did not conform with international human rights norms and could threaten digital rights.</p>\n<p>To comply with India's new IT rules, companies such as Twitter needed to appoint a chief compliance officer, a nodal officer and a resident grievance officer. But LinkedIn job postings show all three positions were currently open at Twitter.</p>\n<p>The social media giant has however retained an interim chief compliance officer, it said this week, adding that it was making all efforts to adhere to the new IT rules.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TWTR":"Twitter","QNETCN":"纳斯达克中美互联网老虎指数"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2144713727","content_text":"LUCKNOW, India June 18 (Reuters) - Police in India have summoned Twitter's top official in the country to answer allegations that the U.S. firm failed to stop the spread of a video that allegedly incited \"hate and enmity\" between Hindu and Muslim communities.\nAn official police notice, seen by Reuters, showed a case had been registered in Ghaziabad in northern Uttar Pradesh state over a video of a few men, apparently Hindu, beating an elderly man believed to be a Muslim and cutting his beard.\nThe police report names Twitter Inc , its local unit and seven others for their alleged roles in disseminating a video that was deemed insulting to religious beliefs and causing\npublic mischief in a state with a long, bloody history of communal violence.\nThe controversy comes just as India's federal government is locking horns with Twitter over non-compliance with new IT rules, which have raised doubts whether the platform would continue to enjoy protection against legal liability for user-generated content. The new rules became effective in late May.\nIn a notice dated Thursday, Ghaziabad police wrote to Twitter India head Manish Maheshwari to appear before officials within seven days of the receipt of the summons.\n\"Some people used their Twitter handles to spread hatred and enmity in the society and Twitter did not take cognisance,\" said the notice, which was reviewed by Reuters.\n\"Writings and works which promoted enmity and affected harmony between different communities in the country and the state were encouraged and such anti-society messages were allowed to go viral.\"\nTwitter declined to comment, and Maheshwari did not respond to a request for comment.\nIT minister Ravi Shankar Prasad lashed out at Twitter this week for the Ghaziabad incident, saying its failure to act was \"perplexing.\"\nNO SAFE HARBOUR\nPrasad has said Twitter has not complied with a new set of government rules that required them to appoint new compliance officers by May 26.\nThe rules state that in case of non-compliance, protection that companies enjoy related to any liability against user generated content \"shall not be applicable\" and companies \"shall be liable for punishment under any law.\"\n\"The moment Twitter was non-complaint, the safe harbour protection was automatically not available,\" said Shlok Chandra,\na New Delhi-based lawyer who represents the federal government in various cases. \"The position is very clear.\"\nSome free speech activists and lawyers, however, disagree.\n\"The Central Government neither has the power to bestow, nor the power to \"withdraw\" the exemption from liability...The determination of the question whether Twitter is entitled to seek exemption from liability is solely within the domain of the Courts,\" Delhi-based Ira Law firm said in a LinkedIn post this month.\nThree special rapporteurs appointed by a top United Nations human rights body last week urged India to review the new IT rules, saying their broadened scope did not conform with international human rights norms and could threaten digital rights.\nTo comply with India's new IT rules, companies such as Twitter needed to appoint a chief compliance officer, a nodal officer and a resident grievance officer. But LinkedIn job postings show all three positions were currently open at Twitter.\nThe social media giant has however retained an interim chief compliance officer, it said this week, adding that it was making all efforts to adhere to the new IT rules.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":156,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":166497227,"gmtCreate":1624021574769,"gmtModify":1703826760686,"author":{"id":"3574982978889356","authorId":"3574982978889356","name":"Faizztikuss","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d997b1472c0a74a79e4dcc956ed68e44","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574982978889356","authorIdStr":"3574982978889356"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"??","listText":"??","text":"??","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/166497227","repostId":"1140699063","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1140699063","pubTimestamp":1624020833,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1140699063?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-18 20:53","market":"us","language":"en","title":"As e-commerce sales proliferate, Amazon holds on to top online retail spot","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1140699063","media":"cnbc","summary":"As Amazon prepares for its annual Prime Day megasale, its reign as the biggest online retailer in th","content":"<div>\n<p>As Amazon prepares for its annual Prime Day megasale, its reign as the biggest online retailer in the country is eye-popping: It's projected to be raking in more than 40% of the nation's e-commerce ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/06/18/as-e-commerce-sales-proliferate-amazon-holds-on-to-top-online-retail-spot.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"cnbc_highlight","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>As e-commerce sales proliferate, Amazon holds on to top online retail spot</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAs e-commerce sales proliferate, Amazon holds on to top online retail spot\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-06-18 20:53 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.cnbc.com/2021/06/18/as-e-commerce-sales-proliferate-amazon-holds-on-to-top-online-retail-spot.html><strong>cnbc</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>As Amazon prepares for its annual Prime Day megasale, its reign as the biggest online retailer in the country is eye-popping: It's projected to be raking in more than 40% of the nation's e-commerce ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/06/18/as-e-commerce-sales-proliferate-amazon-holds-on-to-top-online-retail-spot.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AMZN":"亚马逊"},"source_url":"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/06/18/as-e-commerce-sales-proliferate-amazon-holds-on-to-top-online-retail-spot.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/72bb72e1b84c09fca865c6dcb1bbcd16","article_id":"1140699063","content_text":"As Amazon prepares for its annual Prime Day megasale, its reign as the biggest online retailer in the country is eye-popping: It's projected to be raking in more than 40% of the nation's e-commerce sales by the end of 2021.\nAmazon's dominance on the internet has only grown as shopping online becomes second nature for many consumers. That's exactly what has transpired over the past 13 years.\nIn 2008, e-commerce sales accounted for just 3.6% of total retail sales in the United States, according to data from eMarketer. Following gradual growth year after year, that figure skyrocketed to 14% in 2020, as the Covid pandemic fueled online spending on everything from groceries and toilet paper to spin bikes and workout clothes. E-commerce sales are predicted to account for 15.3% of total retail sales by the end of this year and jump to 23.5% by 2025, eMarketer said.\n\nFalling second to Amazon and far behind, big-box chainWalmartis predicted to take about 7% of the digital retail market this year. The two are followed byeBay,Apple,Home Depot,TargetandBest Buy, according to eMarketer.\nWalmart and Target are holding competing deals events — as they have in past years — to coincide with Amazon Prime Day 2021. Both discounters will start sales on Sunday, but Walmart's offers extend through Wednesday, while Target and Amazon end on Tuesday. Both Walmart and Target hope to reach customers who are already browsing the web on Prime Day for summer discounts.\n\nAccording toa recent research reportfromJPMorgan, Amazon is on track to overtake Walmart as the largest U.S. retailer in 2022, as it gains a greater and greater share of the total e-commerce market. Consumers' accelerated adoption of internet shopping during the Covid pandemic has also provided a lift to other areas of Amazon's business, too, JPMorgan said.\nEMarketer is forecasting that total digital sales in the U.S. on Prime Day will jump 17.3% year over year to $12.18 billion. Sales made exclusively on Amazon on Prime Day will grow 18.3% from 2020 levels, to $7.31 billion, it said.\nLast year, Amazon's typical July timing for its shopping extravaganza was postponed all the way into October because of the pandemic. Prime Day ended up marking the unofficial kick-off to the holiday shopping season.\nBack on a more normal schedule,this year's event has been moved up slightlyinto June. Experts say the company is looking to boost spending in what is normally a slower time in the retail calendar. The new timing could also prompt an earlier kickoff to back-to-school shopping.\n\"Amazon will be coy, when they announce ... and so they have the benefit of knowing what they're doing to make sure that they're in a good position,\" Rod Sides, a vice chairman of retail and distribution at Deloitte, said in an interview. \"Whereas the others are responding.\"","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":154,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":353972636,"gmtCreate":1616458773525,"gmtModify":1704794300758,"author":{"id":"3574982978889356","authorId":"3574982978889356","name":"Faizztikuss","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d997b1472c0a74a79e4dcc956ed68e44","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574982978889356","authorIdStr":"3574982978889356"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Lets buy RLX","listText":"Lets buy RLX","text":"Lets buy RLX","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/353972636","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":371,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":359494274,"gmtCreate":1616418717198,"gmtModify":1704793799417,"author":{"id":"3574982978889356","authorId":"3574982978889356","name":"Faizztikuss","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d997b1472c0a74a79e4dcc956ed68e44","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574982978889356","authorIdStr":"3574982978889356"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Nice","listText":"Nice","text":"Nice","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/359494274","repostId":"1117558087","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1117558087","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1616403074,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1117558087?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-03-22 16:51","market":"hk","language":"en","title":"Hong Kong stocks close lower on Europe lockdowns, lira plunge","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1117558087","media":"Reuters","summary":"Hong Kong stocks closed lower on Monday, as fears of prolonged lockdowns in some European countries ","content":"<p>Hong Kong stocks closed lower on Monday, as fears of prolonged lockdowns in some European countries dampened recovery hopes while a plunge in the Turkish lira also hit investor sentiment.</p>\n<p>The Hang Seng index fell 0.4%, to 28,885.34, while the China Enterprises Index gained 0.2%, to 11,306.71.</p>\n<p>Germany plans to extend a lockdown to contain COVID-19 infections into a fifth month, according to a draft proposal, after new cases exceeded levels authorities say will cause hospitals to be overstretched.</p>\n<p>Confidence in the safety of AstraZeneca’s COVID-19 vaccine has taken a big hit in Spain, Germany, France and Italy as reports of rare blood clots have been linked to it and many countries briefly stopped using it, poll data showed.</p>\n<p>Adding to the pressure was a slump in Turkey’s lira.</p>\n<p>The lira plunged 15% to near its all-time low after markets opened following President Tayyip Erdogan’s shock weekend decision to oust a hawkish central bank governor and install a like-minded critic of high interest rates.</p>\n<p>Analysts remain optimistic about Hong Kong stocks going ahead, citing low valuations.</p>\n<p>The PE ratios of the Hang Seng index and the Hang Seng China Enterprises index remain far lower than that of the S&amp;P 500, making them more attractive to allocate, CITIC Hong Kong analyst said in a note, recommending internet leaders and banking stocks with high dividends.</p>\n<p>Around the region, MSCI’s Asia ex-Japan stock index was firmer by 0.21%, while Japan’s Nikkei index closed down 2.07%.</p>\n<p>The yuan was quoted at 6.51 per U.S. dollar at 0829 GMT, flat compared to the previous close of 6.5097.</p>\n<p>At close, China’s A-shares were trading at a premium of 33.46% over Hong Kong-listed H-shares.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Hong Kong stocks close lower on Europe lockdowns, lira plunge</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHong Kong stocks close lower on Europe lockdowns, lira plunge\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-03-22 16:51</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Hong Kong stocks closed lower on Monday, as fears of prolonged lockdowns in some European countries dampened recovery hopes while a plunge in the Turkish lira also hit investor sentiment.</p>\n<p>The Hang Seng index fell 0.4%, to 28,885.34, while the China Enterprises Index gained 0.2%, to 11,306.71.</p>\n<p>Germany plans to extend a lockdown to contain COVID-19 infections into a fifth month, according to a draft proposal, after new cases exceeded levels authorities say will cause hospitals to be overstretched.</p>\n<p>Confidence in the safety of AstraZeneca’s COVID-19 vaccine has taken a big hit in Spain, Germany, France and Italy as reports of rare blood clots have been linked to it and many countries briefly stopped using it, poll data showed.</p>\n<p>Adding to the pressure was a slump in Turkey’s lira.</p>\n<p>The lira plunged 15% to near its all-time low after markets opened following President Tayyip Erdogan’s shock weekend decision to oust a hawkish central bank governor and install a like-minded critic of high interest rates.</p>\n<p>Analysts remain optimistic about Hong Kong stocks going ahead, citing low valuations.</p>\n<p>The PE ratios of the Hang Seng index and the Hang Seng China Enterprises index remain far lower than that of the S&amp;P 500, making them more attractive to allocate, CITIC Hong Kong analyst said in a note, recommending internet leaders and banking stocks with high dividends.</p>\n<p>Around the region, MSCI’s Asia ex-Japan stock index was firmer by 0.21%, while Japan’s Nikkei index closed down 2.07%.</p>\n<p>The yuan was quoted at 6.51 per U.S. dollar at 0829 GMT, flat compared to the previous close of 6.5097.</p>\n<p>At close, China’s A-shares were trading at a premium of 33.46% over Hong Kong-listed H-shares.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"HSCCI":"红筹指数","HSCEI":"国企指数","HSI":"恒生指数","HSTECH":"恒生科技指数"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1117558087","content_text":"Hong Kong stocks closed lower on Monday, as fears of prolonged lockdowns in some European countries dampened recovery hopes while a plunge in the Turkish lira also hit investor sentiment.\nThe Hang Seng index fell 0.4%, to 28,885.34, while the China Enterprises Index gained 0.2%, to 11,306.71.\nGermany plans to extend a lockdown to contain COVID-19 infections into a fifth month, according to a draft proposal, after new cases exceeded levels authorities say will cause hospitals to be overstretched.\nConfidence in the safety of AstraZeneca’s COVID-19 vaccine has taken a big hit in Spain, Germany, France and Italy as reports of rare blood clots have been linked to it and many countries briefly stopped using it, poll data showed.\nAdding to the pressure was a slump in Turkey’s lira.\nThe lira plunged 15% to near its all-time low after markets opened following President Tayyip Erdogan’s shock weekend decision to oust a hawkish central bank governor and install a like-minded critic of high interest rates.\nAnalysts remain optimistic about Hong Kong stocks going ahead, citing low valuations.\nThe PE ratios of the Hang Seng index and the Hang Seng China Enterprises index remain far lower than that of the S&P 500, making them more attractive to allocate, CITIC Hong Kong analyst said in a note, recommending internet leaders and banking stocks with high dividends.\nAround the region, MSCI’s Asia ex-Japan stock index was firmer by 0.21%, while Japan’s Nikkei index closed down 2.07%.\nThe yuan was quoted at 6.51 per U.S. dollar at 0829 GMT, flat compared to the previous close of 6.5097.\nAt close, China’s A-shares were trading at a premium of 33.46% over Hong Kong-listed H-shares.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":482,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":359494167,"gmtCreate":1616418697759,"gmtModify":1704793799092,"author":{"id":"3574982978889356","authorId":"3574982978889356","name":"Faizztikuss","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d997b1472c0a74a79e4dcc956ed68e44","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574982978889356","authorIdStr":"3574982978889356"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Interesting&nbsp;","listText":"Interesting&nbsp;","text":"Interesting","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/359494167","repostId":"1101568126","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1101568126","pubTimestamp":1616405046,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1101568126?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-03-22 17:24","market":"us","language":"en","title":"The Market Isn’t Fighting the Fed. What That Means for Stocks.","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1101568126","media":"Barrons","summary":"It’s supposed to be the battle of, if not this century, then at least this year—theFederal Reserve v","content":"<p>It’s supposed to be the battle of, if not this century, then at least this year—theFederal Reserve versus the bond market. But if it is, the Fed isn’t putting up much of a fight. If that remains the case, expect value stocks to remain the market’s winners.</p>\n<p>Heading into the Federal Open Market Committee meeting this past week, hopes were running high that Fed Chairman Jerome Powell would do something to slow the rise in bond yields. He did no such thing.</p>\n<p>Sure, Powell reinforced the Fed’s pledge tokeep its benchmark short-term interest rates near zerothrough 2023, even as the central bank’s “dots”reflected economic growthof 6.5% in 2021. Little was said about the rise in the 10-year Treasury, which remained calm as Powell spoke.</p>\n<p>And then the selling started, with longer-term Treasuries leading the way. The 10-year’s yield had shot as high as 1.76% during the week before ending at 1.73% on Friday, causing theiShares 20+ Year Treasury Bondexchange-traded fund (ticker: TLT) to drop 1%. TheDow Jones Industrial Averagedeclined by 150.67 points, or 0.5%, to 32,627.97, while theS&amp;P 500index fell 0.8%, to 3913.10, and theNasdaq Compositeslipped 0.8%, to 13215.24, as the most speculative tech stocks got hit.</p>\n<p>Not that the Fed would worry about these moves. If anything, it’s probably feeling pretty good about what’s happening. The surging 10-year has taken the wind out of the sails of highly valued companies, such asTesla(TSLA) andZoom Video Communications(ZM), and quietedbubble talkfor now. The amount of inflation priced into 10-year Treasury inflation-protected securities, or TIPS,sits at 2.27%, lower than the2.5% reflected in five-year TIPS, suggesting that the market accepts that the coming surge in inflation might actually be transitory.</p>\n<p>Financial markets, meanwhile, aren’t pricing in a full tightening until 2023, observesDeutsche Bankstrategist Alan Ruskin, who argues that they would have been calling for higher rates as early as late 2021 under the previous monetary policy regime. “It is a common notion that the markets aren’t listening to the Fed, but fighting the Fed,” Ruskin writes. “The markets are listening, more than it might seem.”</p>\n<p>Besides, the Fed’s prime motivation is maintaining financial stability, and right now the rise in bond yields doesn’t appear to be having an impact. In fact, the spread between high-yield bonds and the equivalent Treasuries sits at 3.66 percentage points, 0.2 of a point lower than where it started the year, while spreads between triple-C-rated junk bonds and Treasuries have narrowed by 1.2 points.</p>\n<p>“Keep in mind, as long as credit spreads…are tight, the Fed has no real rush to stop yields from rising,” writes Larry McDonald, author of the Bear Traps Report newsletter. “When the selloff turns from a rotation out of tech, to everything selling off, they will take notice.”</p>\n<p>For now that doesn’t seem to be the case. Sure, banks had a tough week, with theSPDR S&amp;P BankETF (KBE) falling 2.1%, but it looks more like a short-lived response to the Fed’s decision to let apandemic-related loosening of the regulatory rules expire, not larger fundamental problems. TheEnergy Select Sector SPDRETF (XLE) dropped 7.5%, as oil briefly slid below $60. But that decline, too, looked more like a positioning problem, following a 71% rise since the end of October, rather than anything fundamental.</p>\n<p>“Concerns aboutslowing Asian demandare grabbing headlines, but we see the current soft patch as largely flows-driven, rather than fundamental distress,” writes RBC commodity strategist Michael Tran.</p>\n<p>In fact, Thursday’s energy-sector selloff, while brutal, might not have been brutal enough to signal a bigger problem, according to Sundial Capital Research’s Dean Christians. It was certainly painful—every stock in the sector finished the day below its 10-day moving average. But 95% of the stocks were still trading above their 200-day moving averages, a sign of longer-term strength. That combination has happened just 12 times since 1980, and when it did, the sector traded higher six months later 82% of the time, with a median gain of 16%. “The group is short-term oversold in an uptrend,” Christians writes.</p>\n<p>Sure, maybe the Fed eventually capitulates and pulls an Operation Twist out of its back pocket, or finds another way to keep yields from rising. But if Powell continues to back away from this fight, owning banks, energy, and other value stocks is one of the only ways to protect a portfolio.</p>\n<p>Don’t fight the Fed, especially if it’s not spoiling for a fight.</p>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>The Market Isn’t Fighting the Fed. What That Means for Stocks.</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nThe Market Isn’t Fighting the Fed. What That Means for Stocks.\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-03-22 17:24 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.barrons.com/articles/the-market-isnt-fighting-the-fed-what-that-means-for-stocks-51616199228?mod=RTA><strong>Barrons</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>It’s supposed to be the battle of, if not this century, then at least this year—theFederal Reserve versus the bond market. But if it is, the Fed isn’t putting up much of a fight. If that remains the ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/the-market-isnt-fighting-the-fed-what-that-means-for-stocks-51616199228?mod=RTA\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/the-market-isnt-fighting-the-fed-what-that-means-for-stocks-51616199228?mod=RTA","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1101568126","content_text":"It’s supposed to be the battle of, if not this century, then at least this year—theFederal Reserve versus the bond market. But if it is, the Fed isn’t putting up much of a fight. If that remains the case, expect value stocks to remain the market’s winners.\nHeading into the Federal Open Market Committee meeting this past week, hopes were running high that Fed Chairman Jerome Powell would do something to slow the rise in bond yields. He did no such thing.\nSure, Powell reinforced the Fed’s pledge tokeep its benchmark short-term interest rates near zerothrough 2023, even as the central bank’s “dots”reflected economic growthof 6.5% in 2021. Little was said about the rise in the 10-year Treasury, which remained calm as Powell spoke.\nAnd then the selling started, with longer-term Treasuries leading the way. The 10-year’s yield had shot as high as 1.76% during the week before ending at 1.73% on Friday, causing theiShares 20+ Year Treasury Bondexchange-traded fund (ticker: TLT) to drop 1%. TheDow Jones Industrial Averagedeclined by 150.67 points, or 0.5%, to 32,627.97, while theS&P 500index fell 0.8%, to 3913.10, and theNasdaq Compositeslipped 0.8%, to 13215.24, as the most speculative tech stocks got hit.\nNot that the Fed would worry about these moves. If anything, it’s probably feeling pretty good about what’s happening. The surging 10-year has taken the wind out of the sails of highly valued companies, such asTesla(TSLA) andZoom Video Communications(ZM), and quietedbubble talkfor now. The amount of inflation priced into 10-year Treasury inflation-protected securities, or TIPS,sits at 2.27%, lower than the2.5% reflected in five-year TIPS, suggesting that the market accepts that the coming surge in inflation might actually be transitory.\nFinancial markets, meanwhile, aren’t pricing in a full tightening until 2023, observesDeutsche Bankstrategist Alan Ruskin, who argues that they would have been calling for higher rates as early as late 2021 under the previous monetary policy regime. “It is a common notion that the markets aren’t listening to the Fed, but fighting the Fed,” Ruskin writes. “The markets are listening, more than it might seem.”\nBesides, the Fed’s prime motivation is maintaining financial stability, and right now the rise in bond yields doesn’t appear to be having an impact. In fact, the spread between high-yield bonds and the equivalent Treasuries sits at 3.66 percentage points, 0.2 of a point lower than where it started the year, while spreads between triple-C-rated junk bonds and Treasuries have narrowed by 1.2 points.\n“Keep in mind, as long as credit spreads…are tight, the Fed has no real rush to stop yields from rising,” writes Larry McDonald, author of the Bear Traps Report newsletter. “When the selloff turns from a rotation out of tech, to everything selling off, they will take notice.”\nFor now that doesn’t seem to be the case. Sure, banks had a tough week, with theSPDR S&P BankETF (KBE) falling 2.1%, but it looks more like a short-lived response to the Fed’s decision to let apandemic-related loosening of the regulatory rules expire, not larger fundamental problems. TheEnergy Select Sector SPDRETF (XLE) dropped 7.5%, as oil briefly slid below $60. But that decline, too, looked more like a positioning problem, following a 71% rise since the end of October, rather than anything fundamental.\n“Concerns aboutslowing Asian demandare grabbing headlines, but we see the current soft patch as largely flows-driven, rather than fundamental distress,” writes RBC commodity strategist Michael Tran.\nIn fact, Thursday’s energy-sector selloff, while brutal, might not have been brutal enough to signal a bigger problem, according to Sundial Capital Research’s Dean Christians. It was certainly painful—every stock in the sector finished the day below its 10-day moving average. But 95% of the stocks were still trading above their 200-day moving averages, a sign of longer-term strength. That combination has happened just 12 times since 1980, and when it did, the sector traded higher six months later 82% of the time, with a median gain of 16%. “The group is short-term oversold in an uptrend,” Christians writes.\nSure, maybe the Fed eventually capitulates and pulls an Operation Twist out of its back pocket, or finds another way to keep yields from rising. But if Powell continues to back away from this fight, owning banks, energy, and other value stocks is one of the only ways to protect a portfolio.\nDon’t fight the Fed, especially if it’s not spoiling for a fight.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":627,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":359401754,"gmtCreate":1616417691878,"gmtModify":1704793780639,"author":{"id":"3574982978889356","authorId":"3574982978889356","name":"Faizztikuss","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d997b1472c0a74a79e4dcc956ed68e44","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574982978889356","authorIdStr":"3574982978889356"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Nice","listText":"Nice","text":"Nice","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/359401754","repostId":"1156786337","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1156786337","pubTimestamp":1616417515,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1156786337?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-03-22 20:51","market":"us","language":"en","title":"These beaten-down tech stocks may be worth their high valuations, two traders say","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1156786337","media":"cnbc","summary":"Semiconductor stocks are in a sweet spot for investors, two traders say.A search for high-momentum s","content":"<div>\n<p>Semiconductor stocks are in a sweet spot for investors, two traders say.A search for high-momentum stocks well off their 52-week highs and worth their maybe-lofty valuations has led Simpler Trading’s ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/03/22/these-beaten-down-tech-stocks-may-be-worth-their-high-valuations.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"cnbc_highlight","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>These beaten-down tech stocks may be worth their high valuations, two traders say</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nThese beaten-down tech stocks may be worth their high valuations, two traders say\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-03-22 20:51 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.cnbc.com/2021/03/22/these-beaten-down-tech-stocks-may-be-worth-their-high-valuations.html><strong>cnbc</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Semiconductor stocks are in a sweet spot for investors, two traders say.A search for high-momentum stocks well off their 52-week highs and worth their maybe-lofty valuations has led Simpler Trading’s ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/03/22/these-beaten-down-tech-stocks-may-be-worth-their-high-valuations.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite","NVDA":"英伟达","AMD":"美国超微公司",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","TSM":"台积电"},"source_url":"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/03/22/these-beaten-down-tech-stocks-may-be-worth-their-high-valuations.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/72bb72e1b84c09fca865c6dcb1bbcd16","article_id":"1156786337","content_text":"Semiconductor stocks are in a sweet spot for investors, two traders say.A search for high-momentum stocks well off their 52-week highs and worth their maybe-lofty valuations has led Simpler Trading’s Danielle Shay and Piper Sandler’s Craig Johnson to the chipmakers.“The space has pulled back pretty significantly and a lot of that I feel has to do with the semiconductor shortages,” Shay said Friday on CNBC’s“Trading Nation.”The VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH) is more than 8% below its 52-week high from February, with the industry expecting the undersupply of chips to endure for at least several months.“I think the semiconductors ... have a lot of potential for growth here. When you’re looking at the market space overall over the course of the next several years, technology’s only going to continue to grow,” said Shay, her firm’s director of options. “Nvidia’s one of my favorites. I like Taiwan Semiconductor and I also like Advanced Micro Devices. All of these companies are pulled back right now, leading to some great entry points for the long term.”Nvidia was also a favorite for Johnson, Piper Sandler’s senior technical research analyst.“Here’s a stock that’s clearly been one of the best names inside of the semiconductor space,” he said in the same interview, referencing a chart of the stock.“It has done extremely well before we started seeing interest rates go up, and frankly for the last about eight months, the stock has done nothing but go sideways,” Johnson said. “In the technical world, from my perspective, this looks like a stock that’s just resting, consolidating, taking a breather after having had a very meaningful move.”Noting that the stock is about 14% off its February highs, the chart analyst said it is seeing a “setback and correction,” not the start of a sharper decline.“This is a stock that’s expected to have over 30% earnings growth,” he said. “So I think this is one of these kind of treasure stocks … that people should be buying as it pulls back and retests the lower end of this trading range.”Don’t buy all at once, though, Johnson said.“I don’t think you have to build your full position here quite yet,” he said. “What I’d like to see happen is as you’re coming down to retest that, start putting the position on and if you confirm and start moving higher after you’ve retested that big area of support, that’s when I’d fill out the rest of the position. So I’d make it two or three ... purchases as you come in and test that support area.”","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":452,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":359569923,"gmtCreate":1616413785662,"gmtModify":1704793707168,"author":{"id":"3574982978889356","authorId":"3574982978889356","name":"Faizztikuss","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d997b1472c0a74a79e4dcc956ed68e44","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574982978889356","authorIdStr":"3574982978889356"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Nice","listText":"Nice","text":"Nice","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/359569923","repostId":"2121124923","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2121124923","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1616412000,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2121124923?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-03-22 19:20","market":"us","language":"en","title":"U.S. senators press Biden to set end date for gas-powered car sales","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2121124923","media":"Reuters","summary":"WASHINGTON  -  California's two U.S. senators are urging President Joe Biden to set a firm date to phase-out gas-powered passenger vehicles as the White House grapples with how to rewrite vehicle emissions rules slashed under President Donald Trump.In an unreported letter going to Biden Monday, Democratic Senators Alex Padilla and Dianne Feinstein called on Biden \"to follow California’s lead and set a date by which all new cars and passenger trucks sold be zero-emission vehicles.\" They also urge","content":"<p>WASHINGTON (Reuters) -  California's two U.S. senators are urging President Joe Biden to set a firm date to phase-out gas-powered passenger vehicles as the White House grapples with how to rewrite vehicle emissions rules slashed under President Donald Trump.</p><p>In an unreported letter going to Biden Monday, Democratic Senators Alex Padilla and Dianne Feinstein called on Biden \"to follow California’s lead and set a date by which all new cars and passenger trucks sold be zero-emission vehicles.\" They also urged Biden to restore California's authority to set clean car standards.</p><p>In September, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed an executive order directing the state's air resources agency to require all new cars and passenger trucks sold in California to be zero-emission by 2035.</p><p>Biden's campaign in 2020 declined to endorse a specific date to end gas-powered vehicle sales, but he has vowed to dramatically boost electric vehicles and charging stations.</p><p>In January, Biden said the administration would replace the federal government's fleet of 650,000 vehicles \"with clean electric vehicles made right here in America made by American workers.\"</p><p>The senators also say Biden should use a compromise deal that California struck with automakers including Ford Motor Co, Honda Motor, BMW AG and Volkswagen AG that falls between the Trump administration and Obama-era requirements.</p><p>\"We believe the national baseline should, at an absolute minimum, be built around the technical lead set by companies that voluntarily advanced their agreements with California,\" Padilla, who replaced Vice President Kamala Harris in the Senate, and Feinstein wrote in the letter seen by Reuters. \"California and other states need a strong federal partner.\"</p><p>Shortly after taking office, Biden ordered U.S. agencies to revisit fuel efficiency standards by July.</p><p>The Trump administration in March 2020 finalized a rollback of fuel economy standards to require 1.5% annual increases in efficiency through 2026, well below the 5% yearly boosts in Obama-administration rules it discarded.</p><p>Then President Donald Trump repeatedly targeted California, a Democratic bastion that tangled with Trump on multiple fronts during his tenure.</p><p>The Center for Biological Diversity estimates the California deal improves fuel economy 3.7% year over year between 2022-2026.</p><p>Biden also directed the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration by April to reconsider Trump’s 2019 decision to revoke California’s authority to set its own auto tailpipe emissions standards and require rising numbers of zero-emission vehicles.</p><p>A White House spokesman declined to comment Sunday on the timing of any announcement on California's vehicle authority.</p><p>California's vehicle emissions standards are followed by 13 other states and the District of Columbia accounting for more than 40% of the U.S. population.</p><p>In January, General Motors said it aspires to end all gasoline passenger car and truck sales by 2035. Volvo, a unit of Zhejiang Geely Holding Group, said its entire car line-up will be fully electric by 2030 and Ford's European lineup will also be fully electric by 2030.</p><p>The Alliance for Automotive Innovation, a trade group representing major automakers, declined comment Sunday but last month backed nationwide rules to achieve vehicle emissions reductions roughly midway between the Trump and Obama standards.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>U.S. senators press Biden to set end date for gas-powered car sales</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nU.S. senators press Biden to set end date for gas-powered car sales\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-03-22 19:20</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>WASHINGTON (Reuters) -  California's two U.S. senators are urging President Joe Biden to set a firm date to phase-out gas-powered passenger vehicles as the White House grapples with how to rewrite vehicle emissions rules slashed under President Donald Trump.</p><p>In an unreported letter going to Biden Monday, Democratic Senators Alex Padilla and Dianne Feinstein called on Biden \"to follow California’s lead and set a date by which all new cars and passenger trucks sold be zero-emission vehicles.\" They also urged Biden to restore California's authority to set clean car standards.</p><p>In September, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed an executive order directing the state's air resources agency to require all new cars and passenger trucks sold in California to be zero-emission by 2035.</p><p>Biden's campaign in 2020 declined to endorse a specific date to end gas-powered vehicle sales, but he has vowed to dramatically boost electric vehicles and charging stations.</p><p>In January, Biden said the administration would replace the federal government's fleet of 650,000 vehicles \"with clean electric vehicles made right here in America made by American workers.\"</p><p>The senators also say Biden should use a compromise deal that California struck with automakers including Ford Motor Co, Honda Motor, BMW AG and Volkswagen AG that falls between the Trump administration and Obama-era requirements.</p><p>\"We believe the national baseline should, at an absolute minimum, be built around the technical lead set by companies that voluntarily advanced their agreements with California,\" Padilla, who replaced Vice President Kamala Harris in the Senate, and Feinstein wrote in the letter seen by Reuters. \"California and other states need a strong federal partner.\"</p><p>Shortly after taking office, Biden ordered U.S. agencies to revisit fuel efficiency standards by July.</p><p>The Trump administration in March 2020 finalized a rollback of fuel economy standards to require 1.5% annual increases in efficiency through 2026, well below the 5% yearly boosts in Obama-administration rules it discarded.</p><p>Then President Donald Trump repeatedly targeted California, a Democratic bastion that tangled with Trump on multiple fronts during his tenure.</p><p>The Center for Biological Diversity estimates the California deal improves fuel economy 3.7% year over year between 2022-2026.</p><p>Biden also directed the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration by April to reconsider Trump’s 2019 decision to revoke California’s authority to set its own auto tailpipe emissions standards and require rising numbers of zero-emission vehicles.</p><p>A White House spokesman declined to comment Sunday on the timing of any announcement on California's vehicle authority.</p><p>California's vehicle emissions standards are followed by 13 other states and the District of Columbia accounting for more than 40% of the U.S. population.</p><p>In January, General Motors said it aspires to end all gasoline passenger car and truck sales by 2035. Volvo, a unit of Zhejiang Geely Holding Group, said its entire car line-up will be fully electric by 2030 and Ford's European lineup will also be fully electric by 2030.</p><p>The Alliance for Automotive Innovation, a trade group representing major automakers, declined comment Sunday but last month backed nationwide rules to achieve vehicle emissions reductions roughly midway between the Trump and Obama standards.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"F":"福特汽车","GM":"通用汽车","TSLA":"特斯拉"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2121124923","content_text":"WASHINGTON (Reuters) -  California's two U.S. senators are urging President Joe Biden to set a firm date to phase-out gas-powered passenger vehicles as the White House grapples with how to rewrite vehicle emissions rules slashed under President Donald Trump.In an unreported letter going to Biden Monday, Democratic Senators Alex Padilla and Dianne Feinstein called on Biden \"to follow California’s lead and set a date by which all new cars and passenger trucks sold be zero-emission vehicles.\" They also urged Biden to restore California's authority to set clean car standards.In September, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed an executive order directing the state's air resources agency to require all new cars and passenger trucks sold in California to be zero-emission by 2035.Biden's campaign in 2020 declined to endorse a specific date to end gas-powered vehicle sales, but he has vowed to dramatically boost electric vehicles and charging stations.In January, Biden said the administration would replace the federal government's fleet of 650,000 vehicles \"with clean electric vehicles made right here in America made by American workers.\"The senators also say Biden should use a compromise deal that California struck with automakers including Ford Motor Co, Honda Motor, BMW AG and Volkswagen AG that falls between the Trump administration and Obama-era requirements.\"We believe the national baseline should, at an absolute minimum, be built around the technical lead set by companies that voluntarily advanced their agreements with California,\" Padilla, who replaced Vice President Kamala Harris in the Senate, and Feinstein wrote in the letter seen by Reuters. \"California and other states need a strong federal partner.\"Shortly after taking office, Biden ordered U.S. agencies to revisit fuel efficiency standards by July.The Trump administration in March 2020 finalized a rollback of fuel economy standards to require 1.5% annual increases in efficiency through 2026, well below the 5% yearly boosts in Obama-administration rules it discarded.Then President Donald Trump repeatedly targeted California, a Democratic bastion that tangled with Trump on multiple fronts during his tenure.The Center for Biological Diversity estimates the California deal improves fuel economy 3.7% year over year between 2022-2026.Biden also directed the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration by April to reconsider Trump’s 2019 decision to revoke California’s authority to set its own auto tailpipe emissions standards and require rising numbers of zero-emission vehicles.A White House spokesman declined to comment Sunday on the timing of any announcement on California's vehicle authority.California's vehicle emissions standards are followed by 13 other states and the District of Columbia accounting for more than 40% of the U.S. population.In January, General Motors said it aspires to end all gasoline passenger car and truck sales by 2035. Volvo, a unit of Zhejiang Geely Holding Group, said its entire car line-up will be fully electric by 2030 and Ford's European lineup will also be fully electric by 2030.The Alliance for Automotive Innovation, a trade group representing major automakers, declined comment Sunday but last month backed nationwide rules to achieve vehicle emissions reductions roughly midway between the Trump and Obama standards.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":587,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":359560767,"gmtCreate":1616413774859,"gmtModify":1704793707329,"author":{"id":"3574982978889356","authorId":"3574982978889356","name":"Faizztikuss","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d997b1472c0a74a79e4dcc956ed68e44","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574982978889356","authorIdStr":"3574982978889356"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Wow","listText":"Wow","text":"Wow","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/359560767","repostId":"1159429130","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":643,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":359699117,"gmtCreate":1616388826139,"gmtModify":1704793376294,"author":{"id":"3574982978889356","authorId":"3574982978889356","name":"Faizztikuss","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d997b1472c0a74a79e4dcc956ed68e44","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574982978889356","authorIdStr":"3574982978889356"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Solid","listText":"Solid","text":"Solid","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/359699117","repostId":"2121288411","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2121288411","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1616381873,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2121288411?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-03-22 10:57","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Barkin: Straightforward decision for Fed to keep \"foot on the gas\"","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2121288411","media":"Reuters","summary":"WASHINGTON, March 21 (Reuters) - The U.S. Federal Reserve's decision to keep monetary loose for the ","content":"<p>WASHINGTON, March 21 (Reuters) - The U.S. Federal Reserve's decision to keep monetary loose for the foreseeable future is a \"straight forward\" decision given the number of people still unemployed and the seemingly low risk of inflation, Richmond Federal Reserve President Thomas Barkin said on Sunday.</p>\n<p>\"Inflation is below our target. Employment is below our target. So we should put our foot on the gas and go full speed on both of them. It is a pretty straight forward time in terms of using our tools,\" Barkin said in comments to a Credit Suisse investment conference.</p>\n<p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Barkin: Straightforward decision for Fed to keep \"foot on the gas\"</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBarkin: Straightforward decision for Fed to keep \"foot on the gas\"\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-03-22 10:57</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>WASHINGTON, March 21 (Reuters) - The U.S. Federal Reserve's decision to keep monetary loose for the foreseeable future is a \"straight forward\" decision given the number of people still unemployed and the seemingly low risk of inflation, Richmond Federal Reserve President Thomas Barkin said on Sunday.</p>\n<p>\"Inflation is below our target. Employment is below our target. So we should put our foot on the gas and go full speed on both of them. It is a pretty straight forward time in terms of using our tools,\" Barkin said in comments to a Credit Suisse investment conference.</p>\n<p></p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2121288411","content_text":"WASHINGTON, March 21 (Reuters) - The U.S. Federal Reserve's decision to keep monetary loose for the foreseeable future is a \"straight forward\" decision given the number of people still unemployed and the seemingly low risk of inflation, Richmond Federal Reserve President Thomas Barkin said on Sunday.\n\"Inflation is below our target. Employment is below our target. So we should put our foot on the gas and go full speed on both of them. It is a pretty straight forward time in terms of using our tools,\" Barkin said in comments to a Credit Suisse investment conference.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":581,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":359699301,"gmtCreate":1616388813603,"gmtModify":1704793376615,"author":{"id":"3574982978889356","authorId":"3574982978889356","name":"Faizztikuss","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d997b1472c0a74a79e4dcc956ed68e44","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574982978889356","authorIdStr":"3574982978889356"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Wow","listText":"Wow","text":"Wow","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/359699301","repostId":"1142823107","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1142823107","pubTimestamp":1616384869,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1142823107?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-03-22 11:47","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Australia's Crown Resorts receives $6.2 billion proposal from Blackstone","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1142823107","media":"reuters","summary":"(Reuters) - Troubled Australian casino operator Crown Resorts Ltd on Monday said it had received a c","content":"<p>(Reuters) - Troubled Australian casino operator Crown Resorts Ltd on Monday said it had received a conditional buyout proposal from U.S. private equity giant Blackstone, sending its shares 19% higher.</p>\n<p>The indicative proposal comes as casinos and gaming operators around the world have seen values plunge as coronavirus lockdowns battered earnings, putting them on the radar of cashed-up investment firms.</p>\n<p>Crown has suffered more than most after a year-long regulatory inquiry aired allegations of money laundering and governance failures at the company, leading to the loss of its gambling licence for its new A$2.2 billion Sydney casino last month.</p>\n<p>Since then, top executives including its chief executive resigned, paving the way for Crown to repair its reputation and regain its licence with ex-federal communications minister and Chairman Helen Coonan at the helm of the overhaul.</p>\n<p>Crown said Blackstone’s proposal was A$11.85 per share, a premium of 20.2% to the company’s last closing price, and valuing it at A$8.02 billion ($6.2 billion).</p>\n<p>Its shares jumped to A$11.750 following news of the proposal on Monday, their highest in a year. The stock fell nearly 20% in 2020 as the inquiry exposed major flaws in the company’s governance.</p>\n<p>Blackstone currently has a 10% stake in Crown which it bought from Macau’s Melco Resorts &amp; Entertainment in April last year at just A$8.15 per share, and is the second-largest holder after billionaire founder James Packer.</p>\n<p>The company’s board had not yet formed a view on the offer, which was subject to conditions including due diligence, arranging debt finance and Blackstone receiving gambling approvals to allow it to operate Crown’s Sydney, Melbourne and Perth licences, the company said in a statement.</p>\n<p>Blackstone most recently acquired the Bellagio in Las Vegas for $4.25 billion, and also owns a casino resort called “The Cosmopolitan” in Las Vegas and Spanish gaming hall operator Cirsa.</p>\n<p>($1 = 1.2967 Australian dollars)</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Australia's Crown Resorts receives $6.2 billion proposal from Blackstone</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAustralia's Crown Resorts receives $6.2 billion proposal from Blackstone\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-03-22 11:47 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-crown-resorts-m-a-blackstone-group/blackstone-proposal-values-australian-casino-operator-crown-at-6-2-billion-idUSKBN2BD0SM?il=0><strong>reuters</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>(Reuters) - Troubled Australian casino operator Crown Resorts Ltd on Monday said it had received a conditional buyout proposal from U.S. private equity giant Blackstone, sending its shares 19% higher....</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.reuters.com/article/us-crown-resorts-m-a-blackstone-group/blackstone-proposal-values-australian-casino-operator-crown-at-6-2-billion-idUSKBN2BD0SM?il=0\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BX":"黑石"},"source_url":"https://www.reuters.com/article/us-crown-resorts-m-a-blackstone-group/blackstone-proposal-values-australian-casino-operator-crown-at-6-2-billion-idUSKBN2BD0SM?il=0","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1142823107","content_text":"(Reuters) - Troubled Australian casino operator Crown Resorts Ltd on Monday said it had received a conditional buyout proposal from U.S. private equity giant Blackstone, sending its shares 19% higher.\nThe indicative proposal comes as casinos and gaming operators around the world have seen values plunge as coronavirus lockdowns battered earnings, putting them on the radar of cashed-up investment firms.\nCrown has suffered more than most after a year-long regulatory inquiry aired allegations of money laundering and governance failures at the company, leading to the loss of its gambling licence for its new A$2.2 billion Sydney casino last month.\nSince then, top executives including its chief executive resigned, paving the way for Crown to repair its reputation and regain its licence with ex-federal communications minister and Chairman Helen Coonan at the helm of the overhaul.\nCrown said Blackstone’s proposal was A$11.85 per share, a premium of 20.2% to the company’s last closing price, and valuing it at A$8.02 billion ($6.2 billion).\nIts shares jumped to A$11.750 following news of the proposal on Monday, their highest in a year. The stock fell nearly 20% in 2020 as the inquiry exposed major flaws in the company’s governance.\nBlackstone currently has a 10% stake in Crown which it bought from Macau’s Melco Resorts & Entertainment in April last year at just A$8.15 per share, and is the second-largest holder after billionaire founder James Packer.\nThe company’s board had not yet formed a view on the offer, which was subject to conditions including due diligence, arranging debt finance and Blackstone receiving gambling approvals to allow it to operate Crown’s Sydney, Melbourne and Perth licences, the company said in a statement.\nBlackstone most recently acquired the Bellagio in Las Vegas for $4.25 billion, and also owns a casino resort called “The Cosmopolitan” in Las Vegas and Spanish gaming hall operator Cirsa.\n($1 = 1.2967 Australian dollars)","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":505,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":350849933,"gmtCreate":1616194727622,"gmtModify":1704792009753,"author":{"id":"3574982978889356","authorId":"3574982978889356","name":"Faizztikuss","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d997b1472c0a74a79e4dcc956ed68e44","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574982978889356","authorIdStr":"3574982978889356"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Wow","listText":"Wow","text":"Wow","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/350849933","repostId":"1199154789","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1199154789","pubTimestamp":1616164372,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1199154789?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-03-19 22:32","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Fed Disappoints Market, Lets SLR Relief Expire: What Happens Next","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1199154789","media":"zerohedge","summary":"As washinted at, and discussed in depth here,the Fed decided - under political pressure from progressive Democrats such asElizabeth Warren and Sherrod Brown- to let the temporary Supplementary Leverage Ratio  exemption expire as scheduled on March 31, the one year anniversary of the rule change.The federal bank regulatory agencies today announced that the temporary change to the supplementary leverage ratio, or SLR, for depository institutions issued on May 15, 2020, will expire as scheduled on ","content":"<p>As washinted at, and discussed in depth here,the Fed decided - under political pressure from progressive Democrats such asElizabeth Warren and Sherrod Brown- to let the temporary Supplementary Leverage Ratio (SLR) exemption expire as scheduled on March 31, the one year anniversary of the rule change.</p><blockquote>The federal bank regulatory agencies today announced that the temporary change to the supplementary leverage ratio, or SLR, for depository institutions issued on May 15, 2020, will expire as scheduled on March 31, 2021.The temporary change was made to provide flexibility for depository institutions to provide credit to households and businesses in light of the COVID-19 event.</blockquote><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b822960da59d651f093b5113cd0c3fd0\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"319\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">This outcome is theone (again) correctly predictedby former NY Fed guru Zoltan Pozsar who following the FOMC said that \"the fact that the Fed made this adjustment practically preemptively – the o/n RRP facility is not being used at the moment, so there are no capacity constraints yet, while repo and bill yields aren’t trading negative yet –<b>suggests that the Fed is “foaming the runway” for the end of SLR exemption</b>.\"</p><p>Knowing well this would be a very hot button issue for the market, the Fed published thefollowing statementto ease trader nerves, noting that while the SLR special treatment will expire on March 31, the Fed is \"inviting public comment on several potential SLR modifications\" and furthermore, \"<b>Board may need to address the current design and calibration of the SLR over time to prevent strains from developing that could both constrain economic growth and undermine financial stability</b>\" - in short, if yields spike, the Fed will re-introduce the SLR without delay:</p><blockquote>The Federal Reserve Board on Friday announced that the temporary change to its supplementary leverage ratio, or SLR, for bank holding companies will expire as scheduled on March 31. <b>Additionally, the Board will shortly seek comment on measures to adjust the SLR. The Board will take appropriate actions to assure that any changes to the SLR do not erode the overall strength of bank capital requirements.</b>To ease strains in the Treasury market resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic and to promote lending to households and businesses, the Board temporarily modified the SLR last year to exclude U.S. Treasury securities and central bank reserves. Since that time, the Treasury market has stabilized. <b>However, because of recent growth in the supply of central bank reserves and the issuance of Treasury securities, the Board may need to address the current design and calibration of the SLR over time to prevent strains from developing that could both constrain economic growth and undermine financial stability.To ensure that the SLR—which was established in 2014 as an additional capital requirement—remains effective in an environment of higher reserves, the Board will soon be inviting public comment on several potential SLR modifications.</b>The proposal and comments will contribute to ongoing discussions with the Department of the Treasury and other regulators on future work to ensure the resiliency of the Treasury market.</blockquote><p>The Fed's soothing wods notwithstanding,<b>having been primed for a favorable outcome, the Fed's disappointing announcement was hardly the news traders were hoping for and stocks tumbled...</b></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c341c3843a5031cd1599c2c89e198050\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"305\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">Bond yields spiked...</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/14173c1ce587fb45efe4c30ecc1dfbab\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"284\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">... while the stock of JPM, which is the most exposed bank to SLR relief (as noted yesterday in \"Facing Up To JP Morgan's Leverage Relief Threats\")...</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/32811183fba3dbddf1c440836298c7f3\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"602\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">.... slumped.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2fba41463f15e79d2b8436cdd6a526fc\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"306\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">In case you've been living under a rock, here's why you should care about the SLR decision: First, for those whomissed our primer on the issue, some background from JPM (ironically the one bank that has the most to lose from the Fed's decision) the bottom line is that without SLR relief,<b>banks may have to delever, raise new capital, halt buybacks, sell preferred stock, turn down deposits and generally push back on reserves (not necessarily all of these, and not in that order) just as the Fed is injecting hundreds of billions of reserves into the market as the Treasury depletes its TGA account.</b></p><blockquote>The massive expansion of the Fed’s balance that has occurred implied an equally massive growth in bank reserves held at Federal Reserve banks. <b>The expiration of the regulatory relief would add ~$2.1tn of leverage exposure across the 8 GSIBs. As well, TGA reduction and continued QE could add another ~$2.35tn of deposits to the system during 2021.</b></blockquote><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/392342c2f3e1dd008b2276172a9b3ecf\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"253\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">While the expiry of the carve-out on March 31 would not have an immediate impact on GSIBs, the continued increase in leverage assets throughout the course of the year would increase long-term debt (LTD) and preferred requirements. Here, JPM takes an optimistic view and writes that<b>\"even the “worst” case issuance scenario as very manageable, with LTD needs of $35bn for TLAC requirements and preferred needs of $15-$20bn to maintain the industry-wide SLR at 5.6%.</b></p><p>The constraint is greater at the bank entity, where the capacity to grow leverage exposure to be ~$765bn at 6.2% SLR.\"Goldman's take was more troubling: the bank estimated that under the continued QE regime, there would be a shortfall of some $2 trillion in reserve capacity, mainly in the form of deposits which the banks would be unable to accept as part of ongoing QE (much more in Goldman'sfull take of the SLR quandary).</p><p><b>So what happens next?</b></p><p>Addressing this topic, yesterday Curvature's Scott Skyrm wrote that \"<i>the largest banks are enjoying much larger balance sheets, but there are political factors in Washington that are against an extension of the exemption.... Here are a couple of scenarios and their implications on the Repo market</i>:</p><blockquote>The exemption is extended 3 months or 6 months - No impact on the Repo market. It's already fully priced-in.The exemption is continued for reserves, but ended for Treasurys. <b>Since large banks are the largest cash providers in the Repo market, less cash is intermediated into the market and Repo rates rise. Volatility increases as Repo assets move from the largest banks to the other Repo market participants.The exemption is ended for both reserves and Treasurys. Same as above.</b></blockquote><p>In other words, Skyrm has a relatively downbeat view, warning that \"since large banks are the largest cash providers in the Repo market, less cash is intermediated into the market and Repo rates rise.\" Additionally, volatility is likely to increase as repo assets move from the largest banks to the other Repo market participants...</p><p>Perhaps a bit too draconian? Well, last week, JPMorgan laid out 5 scenarios for SLR, of which two predicted the end of SLR relief on March 31, as follow:</p><blockquote><u><b>3. Relief ends March 31, banks fully raise capital</b></u> <b>Impact on BanksRatesFront-End Rates</b> <u><b>4. Relief ends March 31, banks raise capital &amp; de-lever</b></u> <b>Impact on BanksRatesFront-End Rates</b></blockquote><p>Going back to Zoltan, let's recallthat the repo gurualso cautioned that \"ending the exemption of reserves and Treasuries from the calculation of the SLR may mean that U.S. banks will turn away deposits and reserves on the margin (not Treasuries) to leave more room for market-making activities,<b>and these flows will swell further money funds’ inflows coming from TGA drawdowns.</b>\"</p><p>More importantly, Zoltan does not expect broad chaos in repo or broader markets, and instead provides a more benign view on the negligible impact the SLR has had (and will be if it is eliminated), as he explained in a note from Tuesday.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/caeeb2b1290e084832f29d61cea6a90b\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"534\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">How to determine if Zoltan's benign view is correct? He concluded his note by writing that \"given that our call for a zero-to-negative FRA-OIS spread by the end of June was predicated on the end of SLR extension and an assumption that the Fed will try to fix a quantity problem with prices, not quantities, today’s adjustments mean that FRA-OIS won’t trade all the way down to zero or negative territory.\"</p><blockquote>FRA-OIS from here will be a function of how tight FX swaps will trade relative to OIS, but Treasury bills trading at deeply sub-zero rates is no longer a risk...</blockquote><p>While Bills have occasionally dipped into the negative territory on occasion, so far they have avoided a fullblown plunge into NIRP, which may be just the positive sign the market is waiting for to ease the nerves associated with the sudden and largely unexpected end of the SLR exemption.</p><p>* *&nbsp; *</p><p>Finally, for those curious what the immediate market impact will be, NatWest strategist Blake Gwinn writes that the Fed announcement that they’re letting regulatory exemptions for banks expire at the end of the month \"really threads the needle and \"assuages concerns about the potential long-term impact on the markets\" as<b>the SLR \"ends it but defuses a lot of the knee-jerk market reaction” by pledging to address the current design and calibration of the supplementary leverage ratio to prevent strains from developing</b>.</p><p>“I was never worried about a day-one bank puke of Treasuries or drawdown in repo or anything like that on no renewal,” Gwinn said. “My concern was the longer run,” like as reserves continue to rise, would the SLR “become a nuisance and drag on Treasuries and spreads” Gwinn concludes that with the statement, the Fed is<b>\"really speaking to those fears and basically saying, ‘don’t worry, we are on it’.”</b></p><p>Well, with yields spiking to HOD in early quad-witch trading, the market sure seems quite skeptical that the Fed is on anything.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Fed Disappoints Market, Lets SLR Relief Expire: What Happens Next</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFed Disappoints Market, Lets SLR Relief Expire: What Happens Next\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-03-19 22:32 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/stocks-bopnds-tank-after-fed-lets-slr-relief-expire><strong>zerohedge</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>As washinted at, and discussed in depth here,the Fed decided - under political pressure from progressive Democrats such asElizabeth Warren and Sherrod Brown- to let the temporary Supplementary ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/stocks-bopnds-tank-after-fed-lets-slr-relief-expire\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/stocks-bopnds-tank-after-fed-lets-slr-relief-expire","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1199154789","content_text":"As washinted at, and discussed in depth here,the Fed decided - under political pressure from progressive Democrats such asElizabeth Warren and Sherrod Brown- to let the temporary Supplementary Leverage Ratio (SLR) exemption expire as scheduled on March 31, the one year anniversary of the rule change.The federal bank regulatory agencies today announced that the temporary change to the supplementary leverage ratio, or SLR, for depository institutions issued on May 15, 2020, will expire as scheduled on March 31, 2021.The temporary change was made to provide flexibility for depository institutions to provide credit to households and businesses in light of the COVID-19 event.This outcome is theone (again) correctly predictedby former NY Fed guru Zoltan Pozsar who following the FOMC said that \"the fact that the Fed made this adjustment practically preemptively – the o/n RRP facility is not being used at the moment, so there are no capacity constraints yet, while repo and bill yields aren’t trading negative yet –suggests that the Fed is “foaming the runway” for the end of SLR exemption.\"Knowing well this would be a very hot button issue for the market, the Fed published thefollowing statementto ease trader nerves, noting that while the SLR special treatment will expire on March 31, the Fed is \"inviting public comment on several potential SLR modifications\" and furthermore, \"Board may need to address the current design and calibration of the SLR over time to prevent strains from developing that could both constrain economic growth and undermine financial stability\" - in short, if yields spike, the Fed will re-introduce the SLR without delay:The Federal Reserve Board on Friday announced that the temporary change to its supplementary leverage ratio, or SLR, for bank holding companies will expire as scheduled on March 31. Additionally, the Board will shortly seek comment on measures to adjust the SLR. The Board will take appropriate actions to assure that any changes to the SLR do not erode the overall strength of bank capital requirements.To ease strains in the Treasury market resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic and to promote lending to households and businesses, the Board temporarily modified the SLR last year to exclude U.S. Treasury securities and central bank reserves. Since that time, the Treasury market has stabilized. However, because of recent growth in the supply of central bank reserves and the issuance of Treasury securities, the Board may need to address the current design and calibration of the SLR over time to prevent strains from developing that could both constrain economic growth and undermine financial stability.To ensure that the SLR—which was established in 2014 as an additional capital requirement—remains effective in an environment of higher reserves, the Board will soon be inviting public comment on several potential SLR modifications.The proposal and comments will contribute to ongoing discussions with the Department of the Treasury and other regulators on future work to ensure the resiliency of the Treasury market.The Fed's soothing wods notwithstanding,having been primed for a favorable outcome, the Fed's disappointing announcement was hardly the news traders were hoping for and stocks tumbled...Bond yields spiked...... while the stock of JPM, which is the most exposed bank to SLR relief (as noted yesterday in \"Facing Up To JP Morgan's Leverage Relief Threats\")....... slumped.In case you've been living under a rock, here's why you should care about the SLR decision: First, for those whomissed our primer on the issue, some background from JPM (ironically the one bank that has the most to lose from the Fed's decision) the bottom line is that without SLR relief,banks may have to delever, raise new capital, halt buybacks, sell preferred stock, turn down deposits and generally push back on reserves (not necessarily all of these, and not in that order) just as the Fed is injecting hundreds of billions of reserves into the market as the Treasury depletes its TGA account.The massive expansion of the Fed’s balance that has occurred implied an equally massive growth in bank reserves held at Federal Reserve banks. The expiration of the regulatory relief would add ~$2.1tn of leverage exposure across the 8 GSIBs. As well, TGA reduction and continued QE could add another ~$2.35tn of deposits to the system during 2021.While the expiry of the carve-out on March 31 would not have an immediate impact on GSIBs, the continued increase in leverage assets throughout the course of the year would increase long-term debt (LTD) and preferred requirements. Here, JPM takes an optimistic view and writes that\"even the “worst” case issuance scenario as very manageable, with LTD needs of $35bn for TLAC requirements and preferred needs of $15-$20bn to maintain the industry-wide SLR at 5.6%.The constraint is greater at the bank entity, where the capacity to grow leverage exposure to be ~$765bn at 6.2% SLR.\"Goldman's take was more troubling: the bank estimated that under the continued QE regime, there would be a shortfall of some $2 trillion in reserve capacity, mainly in the form of deposits which the banks would be unable to accept as part of ongoing QE (much more in Goldman'sfull take of the SLR quandary).So what happens next?Addressing this topic, yesterday Curvature's Scott Skyrm wrote that \"the largest banks are enjoying much larger balance sheets, but there are political factors in Washington that are against an extension of the exemption.... Here are a couple of scenarios and their implications on the Repo market:The exemption is extended 3 months or 6 months - No impact on the Repo market. It's already fully priced-in.The exemption is continued for reserves, but ended for Treasurys. Since large banks are the largest cash providers in the Repo market, less cash is intermediated into the market and Repo rates rise. Volatility increases as Repo assets move from the largest banks to the other Repo market participants.The exemption is ended for both reserves and Treasurys. Same as above.In other words, Skyrm has a relatively downbeat view, warning that \"since large banks are the largest cash providers in the Repo market, less cash is intermediated into the market and Repo rates rise.\" Additionally, volatility is likely to increase as repo assets move from the largest banks to the other Repo market participants...Perhaps a bit too draconian? Well, last week, JPMorgan laid out 5 scenarios for SLR, of which two predicted the end of SLR relief on March 31, as follow:3. Relief ends March 31, banks fully raise capital Impact on BanksRatesFront-End Rates 4. Relief ends March 31, banks raise capital & de-lever Impact on BanksRatesFront-End RatesGoing back to Zoltan, let's recallthat the repo gurualso cautioned that \"ending the exemption of reserves and Treasuries from the calculation of the SLR may mean that U.S. banks will turn away deposits and reserves on the margin (not Treasuries) to leave more room for market-making activities,and these flows will swell further money funds’ inflows coming from TGA drawdowns.\"More importantly, Zoltan does not expect broad chaos in repo or broader markets, and instead provides a more benign view on the negligible impact the SLR has had (and will be if it is eliminated), as he explained in a note from Tuesday.How to determine if Zoltan's benign view is correct? He concluded his note by writing that \"given that our call for a zero-to-negative FRA-OIS spread by the end of June was predicated on the end of SLR extension and an assumption that the Fed will try to fix a quantity problem with prices, not quantities, today’s adjustments mean that FRA-OIS won’t trade all the way down to zero or negative territory.\"FRA-OIS from here will be a function of how tight FX swaps will trade relative to OIS, but Treasury bills trading at deeply sub-zero rates is no longer a risk...While Bills have occasionally dipped into the negative territory on occasion, so far they have avoided a fullblown plunge into NIRP, which may be just the positive sign the market is waiting for to ease the nerves associated with the sudden and largely unexpected end of the SLR exemption.* *  *Finally, for those curious what the immediate market impact will be, NatWest strategist Blake Gwinn writes that the Fed announcement that they’re letting regulatory exemptions for banks expire at the end of the month \"really threads the needle and \"assuages concerns about the potential long-term impact on the markets\" asthe SLR \"ends it but defuses a lot of the knee-jerk market reaction” by pledging to address the current design and calibration of the supplementary leverage ratio to prevent strains from developing.“I was never worried about a day-one bank puke of Treasuries or drawdown in repo or anything like that on no renewal,” Gwinn said. “My concern was the longer run,” like as reserves continue to rise, would the SLR “become a nuisance and drag on Treasuries and spreads” Gwinn concludes that with the statement, the Fed is\"really speaking to those fears and basically saying, ‘don’t worry, we are on it’.”Well, with yields spiking to HOD in early quad-witch trading, the market sure seems quite skeptical that the Fed is on anything.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":200,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":350840172,"gmtCreate":1616194631496,"gmtModify":1704792008947,"author":{"id":"3574982978889356","authorId":"3574982978889356","name":"Faizztikuss","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d997b1472c0a74a79e4dcc956ed68e44","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574982978889356","authorIdStr":"3574982978889356"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"??","listText":"??","text":"??","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/350840172","repostId":"350047190","repostType":1,"repost":{"id":350047190,"gmtCreate":1616143511506,"gmtModify":1704791479419,"author":{"id":"20722186463466","authorId":"20722186463466","name":"爱发红包的虎妞","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/acf27be178fbc21279d1959ce5bec4e7","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"20722186463466","authorIdStr":"20722186463466"},"themes":[],"title":"知乎來嘍~快分享你剛換上的頭像框！","htmlText":"謝邀。人在老虎，剛上樓梯，年入5000虎幣，圈內熟人多，匿了！ 今天只是想告訴虎友們一個內幕：“知乎頭像框”上線啦！！  如何兌換頭像框呢？ 進入APP“我的”頁面，點擊“虎幣兌好禮”，點擊“更多福利”，“社區周邊”中選取“知乎頭像框”，兌換！ 只需要66虎幣噢！！   兌換之後，要選擇佩戴，就能在個人主頁看得到啦~ 如何佩戴頭像框？ 點擊頭像，進入“個人主頁”頁面，點擊“編輯”，點擊“頭像掛件”，選擇“知乎頭像框”佩戴即可。   Ps.&nbsp;換了新頭像後請在評論區集合，老規矩，虎妞準備隨機挑一些虎友報銷~ <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ZH\">$知乎(ZH)$</a>","listText":"謝邀。人在老虎，剛上樓梯，年入5000虎幣，圈內熟人多，匿了！ 今天只是想告訴虎友們一個內幕：“知乎頭像框”上線啦！！  如何兌換頭像框呢？ 進入APP“我的”頁面，點擊“虎幣兌好禮”，點擊“更多福利”，“社區周邊”中選取“知乎頭像框”，兌換！ 只需要66虎幣噢！！   兌換之後，要選擇佩戴，就能在個人主頁看得到啦~ 如何佩戴頭像框？ 點擊頭像，進入“個人主頁”頁面，點擊“編輯”，點擊“頭像掛件”，選擇“知乎頭像框”佩戴即可。   Ps.&nbsp;換了新頭像後請在評論區集合，老規矩，虎妞準備隨機挑一些虎友報銷~ <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ZH\">$知乎(ZH)$</a>","text":"謝邀。人在老虎，剛上樓梯，年入5000虎幣，圈內熟人多，匿了！ 今天只是想告訴虎友們一個內幕：“知乎頭像框”上線啦！！ 如何兌換頭像框呢？ 進入APP“我的”頁面，點擊“虎幣兌好禮”，點擊“更多福利”，“社區周邊”中選取“知乎頭像框”，兌換！ 只需要66虎幣噢！！ 兌換之後，要選擇佩戴，就能在個人主頁看得到啦~ 如何佩戴頭像框？ 點擊頭像，進入“個人主頁”頁面，點擊“編輯”，點擊“頭像掛件”，選擇“知乎頭像框”佩戴即可。 Ps. 換了新頭像後請在評論區集合，老規矩，虎妞準備隨機挑一些虎友報銷~ $知乎(ZH)$","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3063bddce9caf1e49d76936e86a5b03b","width":"600","height":"600"},{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ce754cb38b6b5cd21625701b49d516c1","width":"394","height":"838"},{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7907adc19a345b48e12a954867529023","width":"563","height":"525"}],"top":1,"highlighted":2,"essential":1,"paper":2,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/350047190","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":0,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":1,"subType":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":4,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":180,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":350857429,"gmtCreate":1616194545861,"gmtModify":1704792008463,"author":{"id":"3574982978889356","authorId":"3574982978889356","name":"Faizztikuss","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d997b1472c0a74a79e4dcc956ed68e44","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574982978889356","authorIdStr":"3574982978889356"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Gamestop keep increasing and decreasing&nbsp;","listText":"Gamestop keep increasing and decreasing&nbsp;","text":"Gamestop keep increasing and decreasing","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/350857429","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":207,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":350141292,"gmtCreate":1616169462916,"gmtModify":1704791882178,"author":{"id":"3574982978889356","authorId":"3574982978889356","name":"Faizztikuss","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d997b1472c0a74a79e4dcc956ed68e44","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574982978889356","authorIdStr":"3574982978889356"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Will wait for Nio to drop so I can buy more","listText":"Will wait for Nio to drop so I can buy more","text":"Will wait for Nio to drop so I can buy more","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/350141292","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":208,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":327201596,"gmtCreate":1616083544815,"gmtModify":1704790837499,"author":{"id":"3574982978889356","authorId":"3574982978889356","name":"Faizztikuss","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d997b1472c0a74a79e4dcc956ed68e44","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574982978889356","authorIdStr":"3574982978889356"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Nio please go up ?","listText":"Nio please go up ?","text":"Nio please go up ?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/327201596","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":482,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":322644721,"gmtCreate":1615806218163,"gmtModify":1704786766742,"author":{"id":"3574982978889356","authorId":"3574982978889356","name":"Faizztikuss","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d997b1472c0a74a79e4dcc956ed68e44","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574982978889356","authorIdStr":"3574982978889356"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Buy&nbsp;Nio stocks&nbsp;for long-term ?","listText":"Buy&nbsp;Nio stocks&nbsp;for long-term ?","text":"Buy Nio stocks for long-term ?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/322644721","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":321,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":321320811,"gmtCreate":1615395695933,"gmtModify":1704782279219,"author":{"id":"3574982978889356","authorId":"3574982978889356","name":"Faizztikuss","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d997b1472c0a74a79e4dcc956ed68e44","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574982978889356","authorIdStr":"3574982978889356"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Stonks","listText":"Stonks","text":"Stonks","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/321320811","repostId":"2118672048","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2118672048","pubTimestamp":1615391767,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2118672048?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-03-10 23:56","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why AMC Entertainment Stock Popped (Again) Before Earnings","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2118672048","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"One analyst says it's time to sell AMC -- but investors are ignoring that advice.","content":"<h2>What happened</h2>\n<p>Movie theater chain owner and certified meme stock <b>AMC Entertainment </b>(NYSE:AMC) reports its Q4 earnings this evening. Analysts aren't optimistic (indeed, as you'll see, some are decidedly <i>pessimistic</i>) about its chances, forecasting a $3.61-per-share loss for the quarter on an 89% revenue decline -- but investors don't care.</p>\n<p>They're bidding AMC shares up, and the stock has already risen 15.2% through 10:20 a.m. EST.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/79229b05289dd91daed033d24bb89dd0\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\"><span>Image source: Getty Images.</span></p>\n<h2>So what</h2>\n<p>Not all investors are so enthusiastic, though. In fact, just hours before the report, analysts at independent equity research firm LightShed Partners released a sell rating for AMC stock this morning.</p>\n<p>The \"future of movie-going is not in doubt,\" opined the analyst in a note covered by TheFly.com. Once the pandemic goes away, folks will return to theaters to watch movies on the big screen. But the same may not be true for AMC.</p>\n<p>\"The future of AMC Theaters, however, is very much in doubt,\" warns the analyst, because AMC is \"over-levered\" with more than $11.3 billion in debt, cash poor, and unable to earn much more cash until people feel comfortable coming back to the theater.</p>\n<h2>Now what</h2>\n<p>Of course, that's probably what investors are betting on this morning. With coronavirus still in full swing, the chances of AMC reporting a profit this evening are vanishingly small. What might happen, though, is that management might say something optimistic about the future, something that might keep hope alive that AMC will survive, as opposed to just going bankrupt and then reorganizing itself to resume doing business once the pandemic has passed.</p>\n<p>LightShed thinks that's the more likely scenario, I fear, and values AMC's chances of surviving the recession at no more than $0.01 per share.</p>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why AMC Entertainment Stock Popped (Again) Before Earnings</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy AMC Entertainment Stock Popped (Again) Before Earnings\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-03-10 23:56 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/03/10/why-amc-entertainment-stock-popped-again-before-ea/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>What happened\nMovie theater chain owner and certified meme stock AMC Entertainment (NYSE:AMC) reports its Q4 earnings this evening. Analysts aren't optimistic (indeed, as you'll see, some are ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/03/10/why-amc-entertainment-stock-popped-again-before-ea/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AMC":"AMC院线"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/03/10/why-amc-entertainment-stock-popped-again-before-ea/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2118672048","content_text":"What happened\nMovie theater chain owner and certified meme stock AMC Entertainment (NYSE:AMC) reports its Q4 earnings this evening. Analysts aren't optimistic (indeed, as you'll see, some are decidedly pessimistic) about its chances, forecasting a $3.61-per-share loss for the quarter on an 89% revenue decline -- but investors don't care.\nThey're bidding AMC shares up, and the stock has already risen 15.2% through 10:20 a.m. EST.\nImage source: Getty Images.\nSo what\nNot all investors are so enthusiastic, though. In fact, just hours before the report, analysts at independent equity research firm LightShed Partners released a sell rating for AMC stock this morning.\nThe \"future of movie-going is not in doubt,\" opined the analyst in a note covered by TheFly.com. Once the pandemic goes away, folks will return to theaters to watch movies on the big screen. But the same may not be true for AMC.\n\"The future of AMC Theaters, however, is very much in doubt,\" warns the analyst, because AMC is \"over-levered\" with more than $11.3 billion in debt, cash poor, and unable to earn much more cash until people feel comfortable coming back to the theater.\nNow what\nOf course, that's probably what investors are betting on this morning. With coronavirus still in full swing, the chances of AMC reporting a profit this evening are vanishingly small. What might happen, though, is that management might say something optimistic about the future, something that might keep hope alive that AMC will survive, as opposed to just going bankrupt and then reorganizing itself to resume doing business once the pandemic has passed.\nLightShed thinks that's the more likely scenario, I fear, and values AMC's chances of surviving the recession at no more than $0.01 per share.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":160,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":321362075,"gmtCreate":1615395309297,"gmtModify":1704782271939,"author":{"id":"3574982978889356","authorId":"3574982978889356","name":"Faizztikuss","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d997b1472c0a74a79e4dcc956ed68e44","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574982978889356","authorIdStr":"3574982978889356"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Stonks","listText":"Stonks","text":"Stonks","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/321362075","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":147,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":359560767,"gmtCreate":1616413774859,"gmtModify":1704793707329,"author":{"id":"3574982978889356","authorId":"3574982978889356","name":"Faizztikuss","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d997b1472c0a74a79e4dcc956ed68e44","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574982978889356","authorIdStr":"3574982978889356"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Wow","listText":"Wow","text":"Wow","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/359560767","repostId":"1159429130","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":643,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":359699117,"gmtCreate":1616388826139,"gmtModify":1704793376294,"author":{"id":"3574982978889356","authorId":"3574982978889356","name":"Faizztikuss","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d997b1472c0a74a79e4dcc956ed68e44","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574982978889356","authorIdStr":"3574982978889356"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Solid","listText":"Solid","text":"Solid","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/359699117","repostId":"2121288411","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":581,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":321362075,"gmtCreate":1615395309297,"gmtModify":1704782271939,"author":{"id":"3574982978889356","authorId":"3574982978889356","name":"Faizztikuss","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d997b1472c0a74a79e4dcc956ed68e44","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574982978889356","authorIdStr":"3574982978889356"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Stonks","listText":"Stonks","text":"Stonks","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/321362075","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":147,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":166497227,"gmtCreate":1624021574769,"gmtModify":1703826760686,"author":{"id":"3574982978889356","authorId":"3574982978889356","name":"Faizztikuss","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d997b1472c0a74a79e4dcc956ed68e44","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574982978889356","authorIdStr":"3574982978889356"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"??","listText":"??","text":"??","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/166497227","repostId":"1140699063","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":154,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":359401754,"gmtCreate":1616417691878,"gmtModify":1704793780639,"author":{"id":"3574982978889356","authorId":"3574982978889356","name":"Faizztikuss","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d997b1472c0a74a79e4dcc956ed68e44","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574982978889356","authorIdStr":"3574982978889356"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Nice","listText":"Nice","text":"Nice","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/359401754","repostId":"1156786337","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1156786337","pubTimestamp":1616417515,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1156786337?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-03-22 20:51","market":"us","language":"en","title":"These beaten-down tech stocks may be worth their high valuations, two traders say","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1156786337","media":"cnbc","summary":"Semiconductor stocks are in a sweet spot for investors, two traders say.A search for high-momentum s","content":"<div>\n<p>Semiconductor stocks are in a sweet spot for investors, two traders say.A search for high-momentum stocks well off their 52-week highs and worth their maybe-lofty valuations has led Simpler Trading’s ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/03/22/these-beaten-down-tech-stocks-may-be-worth-their-high-valuations.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"cnbc_highlight","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>These beaten-down tech stocks may be worth their high valuations, two traders say</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nThese beaten-down tech stocks may be worth their high valuations, two traders say\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-03-22 20:51 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.cnbc.com/2021/03/22/these-beaten-down-tech-stocks-may-be-worth-their-high-valuations.html><strong>cnbc</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Semiconductor stocks are in a sweet spot for investors, two traders say.A search for high-momentum stocks well off their 52-week highs and worth their maybe-lofty valuations has led Simpler Trading’s ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/03/22/these-beaten-down-tech-stocks-may-be-worth-their-high-valuations.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite","NVDA":"英伟达","AMD":"美国超微公司",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","TSM":"台积电"},"source_url":"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/03/22/these-beaten-down-tech-stocks-may-be-worth-their-high-valuations.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/72bb72e1b84c09fca865c6dcb1bbcd16","article_id":"1156786337","content_text":"Semiconductor stocks are in a sweet spot for investors, two traders say.A search for high-momentum stocks well off their 52-week highs and worth their maybe-lofty valuations has led Simpler Trading’s Danielle Shay and Piper Sandler’s Craig Johnson to the chipmakers.“The space has pulled back pretty significantly and a lot of that I feel has to do with the semiconductor shortages,” Shay said Friday on CNBC’s“Trading Nation.”The VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH) is more than 8% below its 52-week high from February, with the industry expecting the undersupply of chips to endure for at least several months.“I think the semiconductors ... have a lot of potential for growth here. When you’re looking at the market space overall over the course of the next several years, technology’s only going to continue to grow,” said Shay, her firm’s director of options. “Nvidia’s one of my favorites. I like Taiwan Semiconductor and I also like Advanced Micro Devices. All of these companies are pulled back right now, leading to some great entry points for the long term.”Nvidia was also a favorite for Johnson, Piper Sandler’s senior technical research analyst.“Here’s a stock that’s clearly been one of the best names inside of the semiconductor space,” he said in the same interview, referencing a chart of the stock.“It has done extremely well before we started seeing interest rates go up, and frankly for the last about eight months, the stock has done nothing but go sideways,” Johnson said. “In the technical world, from my perspective, this looks like a stock that’s just resting, consolidating, taking a breather after having had a very meaningful move.”Noting that the stock is about 14% off its February highs, the chart analyst said it is seeing a “setback and correction,” not the start of a sharper decline.“This is a stock that’s expected to have over 30% earnings growth,” he said. “So I think this is one of these kind of treasure stocks … that people should be buying as it pulls back and retests the lower end of this trading range.”Don’t buy all at once, though, Johnson said.“I don’t think you have to build your full position here quite yet,” he said. “What I’d like to see happen is as you’re coming down to retest that, start putting the position on and if you confirm and start moving higher after you’ve retested that big area of support, that’s when I’d fill out the rest of the position. So I’d make it two or three ... purchases as you come in and test that support area.”","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":452,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":359569923,"gmtCreate":1616413785662,"gmtModify":1704793707168,"author":{"id":"3574982978889356","authorId":"3574982978889356","name":"Faizztikuss","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d997b1472c0a74a79e4dcc956ed68e44","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574982978889356","authorIdStr":"3574982978889356"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Nice","listText":"Nice","text":"Nice","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/359569923","repostId":"2121124923","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2121124923","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1616412000,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2121124923?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-03-22 19:20","market":"us","language":"en","title":"U.S. senators press Biden to set end date for gas-powered car sales","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2121124923","media":"Reuters","summary":"WASHINGTON  -  California's two U.S. senators are urging President Joe Biden to set a firm date to phase-out gas-powered passenger vehicles as the White House grapples with how to rewrite vehicle emissions rules slashed under President Donald Trump.In an unreported letter going to Biden Monday, Democratic Senators Alex Padilla and Dianne Feinstein called on Biden \"to follow California’s lead and set a date by which all new cars and passenger trucks sold be zero-emission vehicles.\" They also urge","content":"<p>WASHINGTON (Reuters) -  California's two U.S. senators are urging President Joe Biden to set a firm date to phase-out gas-powered passenger vehicles as the White House grapples with how to rewrite vehicle emissions rules slashed under President Donald Trump.</p><p>In an unreported letter going to Biden Monday, Democratic Senators Alex Padilla and Dianne Feinstein called on Biden \"to follow California’s lead and set a date by which all new cars and passenger trucks sold be zero-emission vehicles.\" They also urged Biden to restore California's authority to set clean car standards.</p><p>In September, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed an executive order directing the state's air resources agency to require all new cars and passenger trucks sold in California to be zero-emission by 2035.</p><p>Biden's campaign in 2020 declined to endorse a specific date to end gas-powered vehicle sales, but he has vowed to dramatically boost electric vehicles and charging stations.</p><p>In January, Biden said the administration would replace the federal government's fleet of 650,000 vehicles \"with clean electric vehicles made right here in America made by American workers.\"</p><p>The senators also say Biden should use a compromise deal that California struck with automakers including Ford Motor Co, Honda Motor, BMW AG and Volkswagen AG that falls between the Trump administration and Obama-era requirements.</p><p>\"We believe the national baseline should, at an absolute minimum, be built around the technical lead set by companies that voluntarily advanced their agreements with California,\" Padilla, who replaced Vice President Kamala Harris in the Senate, and Feinstein wrote in the letter seen by Reuters. \"California and other states need a strong federal partner.\"</p><p>Shortly after taking office, Biden ordered U.S. agencies to revisit fuel efficiency standards by July.</p><p>The Trump administration in March 2020 finalized a rollback of fuel economy standards to require 1.5% annual increases in efficiency through 2026, well below the 5% yearly boosts in Obama-administration rules it discarded.</p><p>Then President Donald Trump repeatedly targeted California, a Democratic bastion that tangled with Trump on multiple fronts during his tenure.</p><p>The Center for Biological Diversity estimates the California deal improves fuel economy 3.7% year over year between 2022-2026.</p><p>Biden also directed the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration by April to reconsider Trump’s 2019 decision to revoke California’s authority to set its own auto tailpipe emissions standards and require rising numbers of zero-emission vehicles.</p><p>A White House spokesman declined to comment Sunday on the timing of any announcement on California's vehicle authority.</p><p>California's vehicle emissions standards are followed by 13 other states and the District of Columbia accounting for more than 40% of the U.S. population.</p><p>In January, General Motors said it aspires to end all gasoline passenger car and truck sales by 2035. Volvo, a unit of Zhejiang Geely Holding Group, said its entire car line-up will be fully electric by 2030 and Ford's European lineup will also be fully electric by 2030.</p><p>The Alliance for Automotive Innovation, a trade group representing major automakers, declined comment Sunday but last month backed nationwide rules to achieve vehicle emissions reductions roughly midway between the Trump and Obama standards.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>U.S. senators press Biden to set end date for gas-powered car sales</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nU.S. senators press Biden to set end date for gas-powered car sales\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-03-22 19:20</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>WASHINGTON (Reuters) -  California's two U.S. senators are urging President Joe Biden to set a firm date to phase-out gas-powered passenger vehicles as the White House grapples with how to rewrite vehicle emissions rules slashed under President Donald Trump.</p><p>In an unreported letter going to Biden Monday, Democratic Senators Alex Padilla and Dianne Feinstein called on Biden \"to follow California’s lead and set a date by which all new cars and passenger trucks sold be zero-emission vehicles.\" They also urged Biden to restore California's authority to set clean car standards.</p><p>In September, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed an executive order directing the state's air resources agency to require all new cars and passenger trucks sold in California to be zero-emission by 2035.</p><p>Biden's campaign in 2020 declined to endorse a specific date to end gas-powered vehicle sales, but he has vowed to dramatically boost electric vehicles and charging stations.</p><p>In January, Biden said the administration would replace the federal government's fleet of 650,000 vehicles \"with clean electric vehicles made right here in America made by American workers.\"</p><p>The senators also say Biden should use a compromise deal that California struck with automakers including Ford Motor Co, Honda Motor, BMW AG and Volkswagen AG that falls between the Trump administration and Obama-era requirements.</p><p>\"We believe the national baseline should, at an absolute minimum, be built around the technical lead set by companies that voluntarily advanced their agreements with California,\" Padilla, who replaced Vice President Kamala Harris in the Senate, and Feinstein wrote in the letter seen by Reuters. \"California and other states need a strong federal partner.\"</p><p>Shortly after taking office, Biden ordered U.S. agencies to revisit fuel efficiency standards by July.</p><p>The Trump administration in March 2020 finalized a rollback of fuel economy standards to require 1.5% annual increases in efficiency through 2026, well below the 5% yearly boosts in Obama-administration rules it discarded.</p><p>Then President Donald Trump repeatedly targeted California, a Democratic bastion that tangled with Trump on multiple fronts during his tenure.</p><p>The Center for Biological Diversity estimates the California deal improves fuel economy 3.7% year over year between 2022-2026.</p><p>Biden also directed the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration by April to reconsider Trump’s 2019 decision to revoke California’s authority to set its own auto tailpipe emissions standards and require rising numbers of zero-emission vehicles.</p><p>A White House spokesman declined to comment Sunday on the timing of any announcement on California's vehicle authority.</p><p>California's vehicle emissions standards are followed by 13 other states and the District of Columbia accounting for more than 40% of the U.S. population.</p><p>In January, General Motors said it aspires to end all gasoline passenger car and truck sales by 2035. Volvo, a unit of Zhejiang Geely Holding Group, said its entire car line-up will be fully electric by 2030 and Ford's European lineup will also be fully electric by 2030.</p><p>The Alliance for Automotive Innovation, a trade group representing major automakers, declined comment Sunday but last month backed nationwide rules to achieve vehicle emissions reductions roughly midway between the Trump and Obama standards.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"F":"福特汽车","GM":"通用汽车","TSLA":"特斯拉"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2121124923","content_text":"WASHINGTON (Reuters) -  California's two U.S. senators are urging President Joe Biden to set a firm date to phase-out gas-powered passenger vehicles as the White House grapples with how to rewrite vehicle emissions rules slashed under President Donald Trump.In an unreported letter going to Biden Monday, Democratic Senators Alex Padilla and Dianne Feinstein called on Biden \"to follow California’s lead and set a date by which all new cars and passenger trucks sold be zero-emission vehicles.\" They also urged Biden to restore California's authority to set clean car standards.In September, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed an executive order directing the state's air resources agency to require all new cars and passenger trucks sold in California to be zero-emission by 2035.Biden's campaign in 2020 declined to endorse a specific date to end gas-powered vehicle sales, but he has vowed to dramatically boost electric vehicles and charging stations.In January, Biden said the administration would replace the federal government's fleet of 650,000 vehicles \"with clean electric vehicles made right here in America made by American workers.\"The senators also say Biden should use a compromise deal that California struck with automakers including Ford Motor Co, Honda Motor, BMW AG and Volkswagen AG that falls between the Trump administration and Obama-era requirements.\"We believe the national baseline should, at an absolute minimum, be built around the technical lead set by companies that voluntarily advanced their agreements with California,\" Padilla, who replaced Vice President Kamala Harris in the Senate, and Feinstein wrote in the letter seen by Reuters. \"California and other states need a strong federal partner.\"Shortly after taking office, Biden ordered U.S. agencies to revisit fuel efficiency standards by July.The Trump administration in March 2020 finalized a rollback of fuel economy standards to require 1.5% annual increases in efficiency through 2026, well below the 5% yearly boosts in Obama-administration rules it discarded.Then President Donald Trump repeatedly targeted California, a Democratic bastion that tangled with Trump on multiple fronts during his tenure.The Center for Biological Diversity estimates the California deal improves fuel economy 3.7% year over year between 2022-2026.Biden also directed the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration by April to reconsider Trump’s 2019 decision to revoke California’s authority to set its own auto tailpipe emissions standards and require rising numbers of zero-emission vehicles.A White House spokesman declined to comment Sunday on the timing of any announcement on California's vehicle authority.California's vehicle emissions standards are followed by 13 other states and the District of Columbia accounting for more than 40% of the U.S. population.In January, General Motors said it aspires to end all gasoline passenger car and truck sales by 2035. Volvo, a unit of Zhejiang Geely Holding Group, said its entire car line-up will be fully electric by 2030 and Ford's European lineup will also be fully electric by 2030.The Alliance for Automotive Innovation, a trade group representing major automakers, declined comment Sunday but last month backed nationwide rules to achieve vehicle emissions reductions roughly midway between the Trump and Obama standards.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":587,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":350849933,"gmtCreate":1616194727622,"gmtModify":1704792009753,"author":{"id":"3574982978889356","authorId":"3574982978889356","name":"Faizztikuss","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d997b1472c0a74a79e4dcc956ed68e44","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574982978889356","authorIdStr":"3574982978889356"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Wow","listText":"Wow","text":"Wow","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/350849933","repostId":"1199154789","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1199154789","pubTimestamp":1616164372,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1199154789?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-03-19 22:32","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Fed Disappoints Market, Lets SLR Relief Expire: What Happens Next","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1199154789","media":"zerohedge","summary":"As washinted at, and discussed in depth here,the Fed decided - under political pressure from progressive Democrats such asElizabeth Warren and Sherrod Brown- to let the temporary Supplementary Leverage Ratio  exemption expire as scheduled on March 31, the one year anniversary of the rule change.The federal bank regulatory agencies today announced that the temporary change to the supplementary leverage ratio, or SLR, for depository institutions issued on May 15, 2020, will expire as scheduled on ","content":"<p>As washinted at, and discussed in depth here,the Fed decided - under political pressure from progressive Democrats such asElizabeth Warren and Sherrod Brown- to let the temporary Supplementary Leverage Ratio (SLR) exemption expire as scheduled on March 31, the one year anniversary of the rule change.</p><blockquote>The federal bank regulatory agencies today announced that the temporary change to the supplementary leverage ratio, or SLR, for depository institutions issued on May 15, 2020, will expire as scheduled on March 31, 2021.The temporary change was made to provide flexibility for depository institutions to provide credit to households and businesses in light of the COVID-19 event.</blockquote><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b822960da59d651f093b5113cd0c3fd0\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"319\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">This outcome is theone (again) correctly predictedby former NY Fed guru Zoltan Pozsar who following the FOMC said that \"the fact that the Fed made this adjustment practically preemptively – the o/n RRP facility is not being used at the moment, so there are no capacity constraints yet, while repo and bill yields aren’t trading negative yet –<b>suggests that the Fed is “foaming the runway” for the end of SLR exemption</b>.\"</p><p>Knowing well this would be a very hot button issue for the market, the Fed published thefollowing statementto ease trader nerves, noting that while the SLR special treatment will expire on March 31, the Fed is \"inviting public comment on several potential SLR modifications\" and furthermore, \"<b>Board may need to address the current design and calibration of the SLR over time to prevent strains from developing that could both constrain economic growth and undermine financial stability</b>\" - in short, if yields spike, the Fed will re-introduce the SLR without delay:</p><blockquote>The Federal Reserve Board on Friday announced that the temporary change to its supplementary leverage ratio, or SLR, for bank holding companies will expire as scheduled on March 31. <b>Additionally, the Board will shortly seek comment on measures to adjust the SLR. The Board will take appropriate actions to assure that any changes to the SLR do not erode the overall strength of bank capital requirements.</b>To ease strains in the Treasury market resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic and to promote lending to households and businesses, the Board temporarily modified the SLR last year to exclude U.S. Treasury securities and central bank reserves. Since that time, the Treasury market has stabilized. <b>However, because of recent growth in the supply of central bank reserves and the issuance of Treasury securities, the Board may need to address the current design and calibration of the SLR over time to prevent strains from developing that could both constrain economic growth and undermine financial stability.To ensure that the SLR—which was established in 2014 as an additional capital requirement—remains effective in an environment of higher reserves, the Board will soon be inviting public comment on several potential SLR modifications.</b>The proposal and comments will contribute to ongoing discussions with the Department of the Treasury and other regulators on future work to ensure the resiliency of the Treasury market.</blockquote><p>The Fed's soothing wods notwithstanding,<b>having been primed for a favorable outcome, the Fed's disappointing announcement was hardly the news traders were hoping for and stocks tumbled...</b></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c341c3843a5031cd1599c2c89e198050\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"305\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">Bond yields spiked...</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/14173c1ce587fb45efe4c30ecc1dfbab\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"284\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">... while the stock of JPM, which is the most exposed bank to SLR relief (as noted yesterday in \"Facing Up To JP Morgan's Leverage Relief Threats\")...</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/32811183fba3dbddf1c440836298c7f3\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"602\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">.... slumped.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2fba41463f15e79d2b8436cdd6a526fc\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"306\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">In case you've been living under a rock, here's why you should care about the SLR decision: First, for those whomissed our primer on the issue, some background from JPM (ironically the one bank that has the most to lose from the Fed's decision) the bottom line is that without SLR relief,<b>banks may have to delever, raise new capital, halt buybacks, sell preferred stock, turn down deposits and generally push back on reserves (not necessarily all of these, and not in that order) just as the Fed is injecting hundreds of billions of reserves into the market as the Treasury depletes its TGA account.</b></p><blockquote>The massive expansion of the Fed’s balance that has occurred implied an equally massive growth in bank reserves held at Federal Reserve banks. <b>The expiration of the regulatory relief would add ~$2.1tn of leverage exposure across the 8 GSIBs. As well, TGA reduction and continued QE could add another ~$2.35tn of deposits to the system during 2021.</b></blockquote><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/392342c2f3e1dd008b2276172a9b3ecf\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"253\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">While the expiry of the carve-out on March 31 would not have an immediate impact on GSIBs, the continued increase in leverage assets throughout the course of the year would increase long-term debt (LTD) and preferred requirements. Here, JPM takes an optimistic view and writes that<b>\"even the “worst” case issuance scenario as very manageable, with LTD needs of $35bn for TLAC requirements and preferred needs of $15-$20bn to maintain the industry-wide SLR at 5.6%.</b></p><p>The constraint is greater at the bank entity, where the capacity to grow leverage exposure to be ~$765bn at 6.2% SLR.\"Goldman's take was more troubling: the bank estimated that under the continued QE regime, there would be a shortfall of some $2 trillion in reserve capacity, mainly in the form of deposits which the banks would be unable to accept as part of ongoing QE (much more in Goldman'sfull take of the SLR quandary).</p><p><b>So what happens next?</b></p><p>Addressing this topic, yesterday Curvature's Scott Skyrm wrote that \"<i>the largest banks are enjoying much larger balance sheets, but there are political factors in Washington that are against an extension of the exemption.... Here are a couple of scenarios and their implications on the Repo market</i>:</p><blockquote>The exemption is extended 3 months or 6 months - No impact on the Repo market. It's already fully priced-in.The exemption is continued for reserves, but ended for Treasurys. <b>Since large banks are the largest cash providers in the Repo market, less cash is intermediated into the market and Repo rates rise. Volatility increases as Repo assets move from the largest banks to the other Repo market participants.The exemption is ended for both reserves and Treasurys. Same as above.</b></blockquote><p>In other words, Skyrm has a relatively downbeat view, warning that \"since large banks are the largest cash providers in the Repo market, less cash is intermediated into the market and Repo rates rise.\" Additionally, volatility is likely to increase as repo assets move from the largest banks to the other Repo market participants...</p><p>Perhaps a bit too draconian? Well, last week, JPMorgan laid out 5 scenarios for SLR, of which two predicted the end of SLR relief on March 31, as follow:</p><blockquote><u><b>3. Relief ends March 31, banks fully raise capital</b></u> <b>Impact on BanksRatesFront-End Rates</b> <u><b>4. Relief ends March 31, banks raise capital &amp; de-lever</b></u> <b>Impact on BanksRatesFront-End Rates</b></blockquote><p>Going back to Zoltan, let's recallthat the repo gurualso cautioned that \"ending the exemption of reserves and Treasuries from the calculation of the SLR may mean that U.S. banks will turn away deposits and reserves on the margin (not Treasuries) to leave more room for market-making activities,<b>and these flows will swell further money funds’ inflows coming from TGA drawdowns.</b>\"</p><p>More importantly, Zoltan does not expect broad chaos in repo or broader markets, and instead provides a more benign view on the negligible impact the SLR has had (and will be if it is eliminated), as he explained in a note from Tuesday.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/caeeb2b1290e084832f29d61cea6a90b\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"534\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">How to determine if Zoltan's benign view is correct? He concluded his note by writing that \"given that our call for a zero-to-negative FRA-OIS spread by the end of June was predicated on the end of SLR extension and an assumption that the Fed will try to fix a quantity problem with prices, not quantities, today’s adjustments mean that FRA-OIS won’t trade all the way down to zero or negative territory.\"</p><blockquote>FRA-OIS from here will be a function of how tight FX swaps will trade relative to OIS, but Treasury bills trading at deeply sub-zero rates is no longer a risk...</blockquote><p>While Bills have occasionally dipped into the negative territory on occasion, so far they have avoided a fullblown plunge into NIRP, which may be just the positive sign the market is waiting for to ease the nerves associated with the sudden and largely unexpected end of the SLR exemption.</p><p>* *&nbsp; *</p><p>Finally, for those curious what the immediate market impact will be, NatWest strategist Blake Gwinn writes that the Fed announcement that they’re letting regulatory exemptions for banks expire at the end of the month \"really threads the needle and \"assuages concerns about the potential long-term impact on the markets\" as<b>the SLR \"ends it but defuses a lot of the knee-jerk market reaction” by pledging to address the current design and calibration of the supplementary leverage ratio to prevent strains from developing</b>.</p><p>“I was never worried about a day-one bank puke of Treasuries or drawdown in repo or anything like that on no renewal,” Gwinn said. “My concern was the longer run,” like as reserves continue to rise, would the SLR “become a nuisance and drag on Treasuries and spreads” Gwinn concludes that with the statement, the Fed is<b>\"really speaking to those fears and basically saying, ‘don’t worry, we are on it’.”</b></p><p>Well, with yields spiking to HOD in early quad-witch trading, the market sure seems quite skeptical that the Fed is on anything.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Fed Disappoints Market, Lets SLR Relief Expire: What Happens Next</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFed Disappoints Market, Lets SLR Relief Expire: What Happens Next\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-03-19 22:32 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/stocks-bopnds-tank-after-fed-lets-slr-relief-expire><strong>zerohedge</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>As washinted at, and discussed in depth here,the Fed decided - under political pressure from progressive Democrats such asElizabeth Warren and Sherrod Brown- to let the temporary Supplementary ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/stocks-bopnds-tank-after-fed-lets-slr-relief-expire\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/stocks-bopnds-tank-after-fed-lets-slr-relief-expire","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1199154789","content_text":"As washinted at, and discussed in depth here,the Fed decided - under political pressure from progressive Democrats such asElizabeth Warren and Sherrod Brown- to let the temporary Supplementary Leverage Ratio (SLR) exemption expire as scheduled on March 31, the one year anniversary of the rule change.The federal bank regulatory agencies today announced that the temporary change to the supplementary leverage ratio, or SLR, for depository institutions issued on May 15, 2020, will expire as scheduled on March 31, 2021.The temporary change was made to provide flexibility for depository institutions to provide credit to households and businesses in light of the COVID-19 event.This outcome is theone (again) correctly predictedby former NY Fed guru Zoltan Pozsar who following the FOMC said that \"the fact that the Fed made this adjustment practically preemptively – the o/n RRP facility is not being used at the moment, so there are no capacity constraints yet, while repo and bill yields aren’t trading negative yet –suggests that the Fed is “foaming the runway” for the end of SLR exemption.\"Knowing well this would be a very hot button issue for the market, the Fed published thefollowing statementto ease trader nerves, noting that while the SLR special treatment will expire on March 31, the Fed is \"inviting public comment on several potential SLR modifications\" and furthermore, \"Board may need to address the current design and calibration of the SLR over time to prevent strains from developing that could both constrain economic growth and undermine financial stability\" - in short, if yields spike, the Fed will re-introduce the SLR without delay:The Federal Reserve Board on Friday announced that the temporary change to its supplementary leverage ratio, or SLR, for bank holding companies will expire as scheduled on March 31. Additionally, the Board will shortly seek comment on measures to adjust the SLR. The Board will take appropriate actions to assure that any changes to the SLR do not erode the overall strength of bank capital requirements.To ease strains in the Treasury market resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic and to promote lending to households and businesses, the Board temporarily modified the SLR last year to exclude U.S. Treasury securities and central bank reserves. Since that time, the Treasury market has stabilized. However, because of recent growth in the supply of central bank reserves and the issuance of Treasury securities, the Board may need to address the current design and calibration of the SLR over time to prevent strains from developing that could both constrain economic growth and undermine financial stability.To ensure that the SLR—which was established in 2014 as an additional capital requirement—remains effective in an environment of higher reserves, the Board will soon be inviting public comment on several potential SLR modifications.The proposal and comments will contribute to ongoing discussions with the Department of the Treasury and other regulators on future work to ensure the resiliency of the Treasury market.The Fed's soothing wods notwithstanding,having been primed for a favorable outcome, the Fed's disappointing announcement was hardly the news traders were hoping for and stocks tumbled...Bond yields spiked...... while the stock of JPM, which is the most exposed bank to SLR relief (as noted yesterday in \"Facing Up To JP Morgan's Leverage Relief Threats\")....... slumped.In case you've been living under a rock, here's why you should care about the SLR decision: First, for those whomissed our primer on the issue, some background from JPM (ironically the one bank that has the most to lose from the Fed's decision) the bottom line is that without SLR relief,banks may have to delever, raise new capital, halt buybacks, sell preferred stock, turn down deposits and generally push back on reserves (not necessarily all of these, and not in that order) just as the Fed is injecting hundreds of billions of reserves into the market as the Treasury depletes its TGA account.The massive expansion of the Fed’s balance that has occurred implied an equally massive growth in bank reserves held at Federal Reserve banks. The expiration of the regulatory relief would add ~$2.1tn of leverage exposure across the 8 GSIBs. As well, TGA reduction and continued QE could add another ~$2.35tn of deposits to the system during 2021.While the expiry of the carve-out on March 31 would not have an immediate impact on GSIBs, the continued increase in leverage assets throughout the course of the year would increase long-term debt (LTD) and preferred requirements. Here, JPM takes an optimistic view and writes that\"even the “worst” case issuance scenario as very manageable, with LTD needs of $35bn for TLAC requirements and preferred needs of $15-$20bn to maintain the industry-wide SLR at 5.6%.The constraint is greater at the bank entity, where the capacity to grow leverage exposure to be ~$765bn at 6.2% SLR.\"Goldman's take was more troubling: the bank estimated that under the continued QE regime, there would be a shortfall of some $2 trillion in reserve capacity, mainly in the form of deposits which the banks would be unable to accept as part of ongoing QE (much more in Goldman'sfull take of the SLR quandary).So what happens next?Addressing this topic, yesterday Curvature's Scott Skyrm wrote that \"the largest banks are enjoying much larger balance sheets, but there are political factors in Washington that are against an extension of the exemption.... Here are a couple of scenarios and their implications on the Repo market:The exemption is extended 3 months or 6 months - No impact on the Repo market. It's already fully priced-in.The exemption is continued for reserves, but ended for Treasurys. Since large banks are the largest cash providers in the Repo market, less cash is intermediated into the market and Repo rates rise. Volatility increases as Repo assets move from the largest banks to the other Repo market participants.The exemption is ended for both reserves and Treasurys. Same as above.In other words, Skyrm has a relatively downbeat view, warning that \"since large banks are the largest cash providers in the Repo market, less cash is intermediated into the market and Repo rates rise.\" Additionally, volatility is likely to increase as repo assets move from the largest banks to the other Repo market participants...Perhaps a bit too draconian? Well, last week, JPMorgan laid out 5 scenarios for SLR, of which two predicted the end of SLR relief on March 31, as follow:3. Relief ends March 31, banks fully raise capital Impact on BanksRatesFront-End Rates 4. Relief ends March 31, banks raise capital & de-lever Impact on BanksRatesFront-End RatesGoing back to Zoltan, let's recallthat the repo gurualso cautioned that \"ending the exemption of reserves and Treasuries from the calculation of the SLR may mean that U.S. banks will turn away deposits and reserves on the margin (not Treasuries) to leave more room for market-making activities,and these flows will swell further money funds’ inflows coming from TGA drawdowns.\"More importantly, Zoltan does not expect broad chaos in repo or broader markets, and instead provides a more benign view on the negligible impact the SLR has had (and will be if it is eliminated), as he explained in a note from Tuesday.How to determine if Zoltan's benign view is correct? He concluded his note by writing that \"given that our call for a zero-to-negative FRA-OIS spread by the end of June was predicated on the end of SLR extension and an assumption that the Fed will try to fix a quantity problem with prices, not quantities, today’s adjustments mean that FRA-OIS won’t trade all the way down to zero or negative territory.\"FRA-OIS from here will be a function of how tight FX swaps will trade relative to OIS, but Treasury bills trading at deeply sub-zero rates is no longer a risk...While Bills have occasionally dipped into the negative territory on occasion, so far they have avoided a fullblown plunge into NIRP, which may be just the positive sign the market is waiting for to ease the nerves associated with the sudden and largely unexpected end of the SLR exemption.* *  *Finally, for those curious what the immediate market impact will be, NatWest strategist Blake Gwinn writes that the Fed announcement that they’re letting regulatory exemptions for banks expire at the end of the month \"really threads the needle and \"assuages concerns about the potential long-term impact on the markets\" asthe SLR \"ends it but defuses a lot of the knee-jerk market reaction” by pledging to address the current design and calibration of the supplementary leverage ratio to prevent strains from developing.“I was never worried about a day-one bank puke of Treasuries or drawdown in repo or anything like that on no renewal,” Gwinn said. “My concern was the longer run,” like as reserves continue to rise, would the SLR “become a nuisance and drag on Treasuries and spreads” Gwinn concludes that with the statement, the Fed is\"really speaking to those fears and basically saying, ‘don’t worry, we are on it’.”Well, with yields spiking to HOD in early quad-witch trading, the market sure seems quite skeptical that the Fed is on anything.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":200,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":359699301,"gmtCreate":1616388813603,"gmtModify":1704793376615,"author":{"id":"3574982978889356","authorId":"3574982978889356","name":"Faizztikuss","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d997b1472c0a74a79e4dcc956ed68e44","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574982978889356","authorIdStr":"3574982978889356"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Wow","listText":"Wow","text":"Wow","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/359699301","repostId":"1142823107","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1142823107","pubTimestamp":1616384869,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1142823107?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-03-22 11:47","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Australia's Crown Resorts receives $6.2 billion proposal from Blackstone","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1142823107","media":"reuters","summary":"(Reuters) - Troubled Australian casino operator Crown Resorts Ltd on Monday said it had received a c","content":"<p>(Reuters) - Troubled Australian casino operator Crown Resorts Ltd on Monday said it had received a conditional buyout proposal from U.S. private equity giant Blackstone, sending its shares 19% higher.</p>\n<p>The indicative proposal comes as casinos and gaming operators around the world have seen values plunge as coronavirus lockdowns battered earnings, putting them on the radar of cashed-up investment firms.</p>\n<p>Crown has suffered more than most after a year-long regulatory inquiry aired allegations of money laundering and governance failures at the company, leading to the loss of its gambling licence for its new A$2.2 billion Sydney casino last month.</p>\n<p>Since then, top executives including its chief executive resigned, paving the way for Crown to repair its reputation and regain its licence with ex-federal communications minister and Chairman Helen Coonan at the helm of the overhaul.</p>\n<p>Crown said Blackstone’s proposal was A$11.85 per share, a premium of 20.2% to the company’s last closing price, and valuing it at A$8.02 billion ($6.2 billion).</p>\n<p>Its shares jumped to A$11.750 following news of the proposal on Monday, their highest in a year. The stock fell nearly 20% in 2020 as the inquiry exposed major flaws in the company’s governance.</p>\n<p>Blackstone currently has a 10% stake in Crown which it bought from Macau’s Melco Resorts &amp; Entertainment in April last year at just A$8.15 per share, and is the second-largest holder after billionaire founder James Packer.</p>\n<p>The company’s board had not yet formed a view on the offer, which was subject to conditions including due diligence, arranging debt finance and Blackstone receiving gambling approvals to allow it to operate Crown’s Sydney, Melbourne and Perth licences, the company said in a statement.</p>\n<p>Blackstone most recently acquired the Bellagio in Las Vegas for $4.25 billion, and also owns a casino resort called “The Cosmopolitan” in Las Vegas and Spanish gaming hall operator Cirsa.</p>\n<p>($1 = 1.2967 Australian dollars)</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Australia's Crown Resorts receives $6.2 billion proposal from Blackstone</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAustralia's Crown Resorts receives $6.2 billion proposal from Blackstone\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-03-22 11:47 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-crown-resorts-m-a-blackstone-group/blackstone-proposal-values-australian-casino-operator-crown-at-6-2-billion-idUSKBN2BD0SM?il=0><strong>reuters</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>(Reuters) - Troubled Australian casino operator Crown Resorts Ltd on Monday said it had received a conditional buyout proposal from U.S. private equity giant Blackstone, sending its shares 19% higher....</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.reuters.com/article/us-crown-resorts-m-a-blackstone-group/blackstone-proposal-values-australian-casino-operator-crown-at-6-2-billion-idUSKBN2BD0SM?il=0\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BX":"黑石"},"source_url":"https://www.reuters.com/article/us-crown-resorts-m-a-blackstone-group/blackstone-proposal-values-australian-casino-operator-crown-at-6-2-billion-idUSKBN2BD0SM?il=0","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1142823107","content_text":"(Reuters) - Troubled Australian casino operator Crown Resorts Ltd on Monday said it had received a conditional buyout proposal from U.S. private equity giant Blackstone, sending its shares 19% higher.\nThe indicative proposal comes as casinos and gaming operators around the world have seen values plunge as coronavirus lockdowns battered earnings, putting them on the radar of cashed-up investment firms.\nCrown has suffered more than most after a year-long regulatory inquiry aired allegations of money laundering and governance failures at the company, leading to the loss of its gambling licence for its new A$2.2 billion Sydney casino last month.\nSince then, top executives including its chief executive resigned, paving the way for Crown to repair its reputation and regain its licence with ex-federal communications minister and Chairman Helen Coonan at the helm of the overhaul.\nCrown said Blackstone’s proposal was A$11.85 per share, a premium of 20.2% to the company’s last closing price, and valuing it at A$8.02 billion ($6.2 billion).\nIts shares jumped to A$11.750 following news of the proposal on Monday, their highest in a year. The stock fell nearly 20% in 2020 as the inquiry exposed major flaws in the company’s governance.\nBlackstone currently has a 10% stake in Crown which it bought from Macau’s Melco Resorts & Entertainment in April last year at just A$8.15 per share, and is the second-largest holder after billionaire founder James Packer.\nThe company’s board had not yet formed a view on the offer, which was subject to conditions including due diligence, arranging debt finance and Blackstone receiving gambling approvals to allow it to operate Crown’s Sydney, Melbourne and Perth licences, the company said in a statement.\nBlackstone most recently acquired the Bellagio in Las Vegas for $4.25 billion, and also owns a casino resort called “The Cosmopolitan” in Las Vegas and Spanish gaming hall operator Cirsa.\n($1 = 1.2967 Australian dollars)","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":505,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":322644721,"gmtCreate":1615806218163,"gmtModify":1704786766742,"author":{"id":"3574982978889356","authorId":"3574982978889356","name":"Faizztikuss","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d997b1472c0a74a79e4dcc956ed68e44","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574982978889356","authorIdStr":"3574982978889356"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Buy&nbsp;Nio stocks&nbsp;for long-term ?","listText":"Buy&nbsp;Nio stocks&nbsp;for long-term ?","text":"Buy Nio stocks for long-term ?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/322644721","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":321,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":162383009,"gmtCreate":1624034586801,"gmtModify":1703827356770,"author":{"id":"3574982978889356","authorId":"3574982978889356","name":"Faizztikuss","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d997b1472c0a74a79e4dcc956ed68e44","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574982978889356","authorIdStr":"3574982978889356"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"??","listText":"??","text":"??","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/162383009","repostId":"2144713727","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2144713727","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1624004460,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2144713727?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-18 16:21","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Twitter's India woes worsen as police summon chief over viral video","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2144713727","media":"Reuters","summary":"LUCKNOW, India June 18 (Reuters) - Police in India have summoned Twitter's top official in the count","content":"<p>LUCKNOW, India June 18 (Reuters) - Police in India have summoned Twitter's top official in the country to answer allegations that the U.S. firm failed to stop the spread of a video that allegedly incited \"hate and enmity\" between Hindu and Muslim communities.</p>\n<p>An official police notice, seen by Reuters, showed a case had been registered in Ghaziabad in northern Uttar Pradesh state over a video of a few men, apparently Hindu, beating an elderly man believed to be a Muslim and cutting his beard.</p>\n<p>The police report names Twitter Inc , its local unit and seven others for their alleged roles in disseminating a video that was deemed insulting to religious beliefs and causing</p>\n<p>public mischief in a state with a long, bloody history of communal violence.</p>\n<p>The controversy comes just as India's federal government is locking horns with Twitter over non-compliance with new IT rules, which have raised doubts whether the platform would continue to enjoy protection against legal liability for user-generated content. The new rules became effective in late May.</p>\n<p>In a notice dated Thursday, Ghaziabad police wrote to Twitter India head Manish Maheshwari to appear before officials within seven days of the receipt of the summons.</p>\n<p>\"Some people used their Twitter handles to spread hatred and enmity in the society and Twitter did not take cognisance,\" said the notice, which was reviewed by Reuters.</p>\n<p>\"Writings and works which promoted enmity and affected harmony between different communities in the country and the state were encouraged and such anti-society messages were allowed to go viral.\"</p>\n<p>Twitter declined to comment, and Maheshwari did not respond to a request for comment.</p>\n<p>IT minister Ravi Shankar Prasad lashed out at Twitter this week for the Ghaziabad incident, saying its failure to act was \"perplexing.\"</p>\n<p>NO SAFE HARBOUR</p>\n<p>Prasad has said Twitter has not complied with a new set of government rules that required them to appoint new compliance officers by May 26.</p>\n<p>The rules state that in case of non-compliance, protection that companies enjoy related to any liability against user generated content \"shall not be applicable\" and companies \"shall be liable for punishment under any law.\"</p>\n<p>\"The moment Twitter was non-complaint, the safe harbour protection was automatically not available,\" said Shlok Chandra,</p>\n<p>a New Delhi-based lawyer who represents the federal government in various cases. \"The position is very clear.\"</p>\n<p>Some free speech activists and lawyers, however, disagree.</p>\n<p>\"The Central Government neither has the power to bestow, nor the power to \"withdraw\" the exemption from liability...The determination of the question whether Twitter is entitled to seek exemption from liability is solely within the domain of the Courts,\" Delhi-based Ira Law firm said in a LinkedIn post this month.</p>\n<p>Three special rapporteurs appointed by a top United Nations human rights body last week urged India to review the new IT rules, saying their broadened scope did not conform with international human rights norms and could threaten digital rights.</p>\n<p>To comply with India's new IT rules, companies such as Twitter needed to appoint a chief compliance officer, a nodal officer and a resident grievance officer. But LinkedIn job postings show all three positions were currently open at Twitter.</p>\n<p>The social media giant has however retained an interim chief compliance officer, it said this week, adding that it was making all efforts to adhere to the new IT rules.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Twitter's India woes worsen as police summon chief over viral video</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTwitter's India woes worsen as police summon chief over viral video\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-06-18 16:21</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>LUCKNOW, India June 18 (Reuters) - Police in India have summoned Twitter's top official in the country to answer allegations that the U.S. firm failed to stop the spread of a video that allegedly incited \"hate and enmity\" between Hindu and Muslim communities.</p>\n<p>An official police notice, seen by Reuters, showed a case had been registered in Ghaziabad in northern Uttar Pradesh state over a video of a few men, apparently Hindu, beating an elderly man believed to be a Muslim and cutting his beard.</p>\n<p>The police report names Twitter Inc , its local unit and seven others for their alleged roles in disseminating a video that was deemed insulting to religious beliefs and causing</p>\n<p>public mischief in a state with a long, bloody history of communal violence.</p>\n<p>The controversy comes just as India's federal government is locking horns with Twitter over non-compliance with new IT rules, which have raised doubts whether the platform would continue to enjoy protection against legal liability for user-generated content. The new rules became effective in late May.</p>\n<p>In a notice dated Thursday, Ghaziabad police wrote to Twitter India head Manish Maheshwari to appear before officials within seven days of the receipt of the summons.</p>\n<p>\"Some people used their Twitter handles to spread hatred and enmity in the society and Twitter did not take cognisance,\" said the notice, which was reviewed by Reuters.</p>\n<p>\"Writings and works which promoted enmity and affected harmony between different communities in the country and the state were encouraged and such anti-society messages were allowed to go viral.\"</p>\n<p>Twitter declined to comment, and Maheshwari did not respond to a request for comment.</p>\n<p>IT minister Ravi Shankar Prasad lashed out at Twitter this week for the Ghaziabad incident, saying its failure to act was \"perplexing.\"</p>\n<p>NO SAFE HARBOUR</p>\n<p>Prasad has said Twitter has not complied with a new set of government rules that required them to appoint new compliance officers by May 26.</p>\n<p>The rules state that in case of non-compliance, protection that companies enjoy related to any liability against user generated content \"shall not be applicable\" and companies \"shall be liable for punishment under any law.\"</p>\n<p>\"The moment Twitter was non-complaint, the safe harbour protection was automatically not available,\" said Shlok Chandra,</p>\n<p>a New Delhi-based lawyer who represents the federal government in various cases. \"The position is very clear.\"</p>\n<p>Some free speech activists and lawyers, however, disagree.</p>\n<p>\"The Central Government neither has the power to bestow, nor the power to \"withdraw\" the exemption from liability...The determination of the question whether Twitter is entitled to seek exemption from liability is solely within the domain of the Courts,\" Delhi-based Ira Law firm said in a LinkedIn post this month.</p>\n<p>Three special rapporteurs appointed by a top United Nations human rights body last week urged India to review the new IT rules, saying their broadened scope did not conform with international human rights norms and could threaten digital rights.</p>\n<p>To comply with India's new IT rules, companies such as Twitter needed to appoint a chief compliance officer, a nodal officer and a resident grievance officer. But LinkedIn job postings show all three positions were currently open at Twitter.</p>\n<p>The social media giant has however retained an interim chief compliance officer, it said this week, adding that it was making all efforts to adhere to the new IT rules.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TWTR":"Twitter","QNETCN":"纳斯达克中美互联网老虎指数"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2144713727","content_text":"LUCKNOW, India June 18 (Reuters) - Police in India have summoned Twitter's top official in the country to answer allegations that the U.S. firm failed to stop the spread of a video that allegedly incited \"hate and enmity\" between Hindu and Muslim communities.\nAn official police notice, seen by Reuters, showed a case had been registered in Ghaziabad in northern Uttar Pradesh state over a video of a few men, apparently Hindu, beating an elderly man believed to be a Muslim and cutting his beard.\nThe police report names Twitter Inc , its local unit and seven others for their alleged roles in disseminating a video that was deemed insulting to religious beliefs and causing\npublic mischief in a state with a long, bloody history of communal violence.\nThe controversy comes just as India's federal government is locking horns with Twitter over non-compliance with new IT rules, which have raised doubts whether the platform would continue to enjoy protection against legal liability for user-generated content. The new rules became effective in late May.\nIn a notice dated Thursday, Ghaziabad police wrote to Twitter India head Manish Maheshwari to appear before officials within seven days of the receipt of the summons.\n\"Some people used their Twitter handles to spread hatred and enmity in the society and Twitter did not take cognisance,\" said the notice, which was reviewed by Reuters.\n\"Writings and works which promoted enmity and affected harmony between different communities in the country and the state were encouraged and such anti-society messages were allowed to go viral.\"\nTwitter declined to comment, and Maheshwari did not respond to a request for comment.\nIT minister Ravi Shankar Prasad lashed out at Twitter this week for the Ghaziabad incident, saying its failure to act was \"perplexing.\"\nNO SAFE HARBOUR\nPrasad has said Twitter has not complied with a new set of government rules that required them to appoint new compliance officers by May 26.\nThe rules state that in case of non-compliance, protection that companies enjoy related to any liability against user generated content \"shall not be applicable\" and companies \"shall be liable for punishment under any law.\"\n\"The moment Twitter was non-complaint, the safe harbour protection was automatically not available,\" said Shlok Chandra,\na New Delhi-based lawyer who represents the federal government in various cases. \"The position is very clear.\"\nSome free speech activists and lawyers, however, disagree.\n\"The Central Government neither has the power to bestow, nor the power to \"withdraw\" the exemption from liability...The determination of the question whether Twitter is entitled to seek exemption from liability is solely within the domain of the Courts,\" Delhi-based Ira Law firm said in a LinkedIn post this month.\nThree special rapporteurs appointed by a top United Nations human rights body last week urged India to review the new IT rules, saying their broadened scope did not conform with international human rights norms and could threaten digital rights.\nTo comply with India's new IT rules, companies such as Twitter needed to appoint a chief compliance officer, a nodal officer and a resident grievance officer. But LinkedIn job postings show all three positions were currently open at Twitter.\nThe social media giant has however retained an interim chief compliance officer, it said this week, adding that it was making all efforts to adhere to the new IT rules.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":156,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":353972636,"gmtCreate":1616458773525,"gmtModify":1704794300758,"author":{"id":"3574982978889356","authorId":"3574982978889356","name":"Faizztikuss","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d997b1472c0a74a79e4dcc956ed68e44","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574982978889356","authorIdStr":"3574982978889356"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Lets buy RLX","listText":"Lets buy RLX","text":"Lets buy RLX","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/353972636","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":371,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":359494274,"gmtCreate":1616418717198,"gmtModify":1704793799417,"author":{"id":"3574982978889356","authorId":"3574982978889356","name":"Faizztikuss","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d997b1472c0a74a79e4dcc956ed68e44","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574982978889356","authorIdStr":"3574982978889356"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Nice","listText":"Nice","text":"Nice","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/359494274","repostId":"1117558087","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":482,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":359494167,"gmtCreate":1616418697759,"gmtModify":1704793799092,"author":{"id":"3574982978889356","authorId":"3574982978889356","name":"Faizztikuss","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d997b1472c0a74a79e4dcc956ed68e44","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574982978889356","authorIdStr":"3574982978889356"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Interesting&nbsp;","listText":"Interesting&nbsp;","text":"Interesting","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/359494167","repostId":"1101568126","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1101568126","pubTimestamp":1616405046,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1101568126?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-03-22 17:24","market":"us","language":"en","title":"The Market Isn’t Fighting the Fed. What That Means for Stocks.","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1101568126","media":"Barrons","summary":"It’s supposed to be the battle of, if not this century, then at least this year—theFederal Reserve v","content":"<p>It’s supposed to be the battle of, if not this century, then at least this year—theFederal Reserve versus the bond market. But if it is, the Fed isn’t putting up much of a fight. If that remains the case, expect value stocks to remain the market’s winners.</p>\n<p>Heading into the Federal Open Market Committee meeting this past week, hopes were running high that Fed Chairman Jerome Powell would do something to slow the rise in bond yields. He did no such thing.</p>\n<p>Sure, Powell reinforced the Fed’s pledge tokeep its benchmark short-term interest rates near zerothrough 2023, even as the central bank’s “dots”reflected economic growthof 6.5% in 2021. Little was said about the rise in the 10-year Treasury, which remained calm as Powell spoke.</p>\n<p>And then the selling started, with longer-term Treasuries leading the way. The 10-year’s yield had shot as high as 1.76% during the week before ending at 1.73% on Friday, causing theiShares 20+ Year Treasury Bondexchange-traded fund (ticker: TLT) to drop 1%. TheDow Jones Industrial Averagedeclined by 150.67 points, or 0.5%, to 32,627.97, while theS&amp;P 500index fell 0.8%, to 3913.10, and theNasdaq Compositeslipped 0.8%, to 13215.24, as the most speculative tech stocks got hit.</p>\n<p>Not that the Fed would worry about these moves. If anything, it’s probably feeling pretty good about what’s happening. The surging 10-year has taken the wind out of the sails of highly valued companies, such asTesla(TSLA) andZoom Video Communications(ZM), and quietedbubble talkfor now. The amount of inflation priced into 10-year Treasury inflation-protected securities, or TIPS,sits at 2.27%, lower than the2.5% reflected in five-year TIPS, suggesting that the market accepts that the coming surge in inflation might actually be transitory.</p>\n<p>Financial markets, meanwhile, aren’t pricing in a full tightening until 2023, observesDeutsche Bankstrategist Alan Ruskin, who argues that they would have been calling for higher rates as early as late 2021 under the previous monetary policy regime. “It is a common notion that the markets aren’t listening to the Fed, but fighting the Fed,” Ruskin writes. “The markets are listening, more than it might seem.”</p>\n<p>Besides, the Fed’s prime motivation is maintaining financial stability, and right now the rise in bond yields doesn’t appear to be having an impact. In fact, the spread between high-yield bonds and the equivalent Treasuries sits at 3.66 percentage points, 0.2 of a point lower than where it started the year, while spreads between triple-C-rated junk bonds and Treasuries have narrowed by 1.2 points.</p>\n<p>“Keep in mind, as long as credit spreads…are tight, the Fed has no real rush to stop yields from rising,” writes Larry McDonald, author of the Bear Traps Report newsletter. “When the selloff turns from a rotation out of tech, to everything selling off, they will take notice.”</p>\n<p>For now that doesn’t seem to be the case. Sure, banks had a tough week, with theSPDR S&amp;P BankETF (KBE) falling 2.1%, but it looks more like a short-lived response to the Fed’s decision to let apandemic-related loosening of the regulatory rules expire, not larger fundamental problems. TheEnergy Select Sector SPDRETF (XLE) dropped 7.5%, as oil briefly slid below $60. But that decline, too, looked more like a positioning problem, following a 71% rise since the end of October, rather than anything fundamental.</p>\n<p>“Concerns aboutslowing Asian demandare grabbing headlines, but we see the current soft patch as largely flows-driven, rather than fundamental distress,” writes RBC commodity strategist Michael Tran.</p>\n<p>In fact, Thursday’s energy-sector selloff, while brutal, might not have been brutal enough to signal a bigger problem, according to Sundial Capital Research’s Dean Christians. It was certainly painful—every stock in the sector finished the day below its 10-day moving average. But 95% of the stocks were still trading above their 200-day moving averages, a sign of longer-term strength. That combination has happened just 12 times since 1980, and when it did, the sector traded higher six months later 82% of the time, with a median gain of 16%. “The group is short-term oversold in an uptrend,” Christians writes.</p>\n<p>Sure, maybe the Fed eventually capitulates and pulls an Operation Twist out of its back pocket, or finds another way to keep yields from rising. But if Powell continues to back away from this fight, owning banks, energy, and other value stocks is one of the only ways to protect a portfolio.</p>\n<p>Don’t fight the Fed, especially if it’s not spoiling for a fight.</p>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>The Market Isn’t Fighting the Fed. What That Means for Stocks.</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nThe Market Isn’t Fighting the Fed. What That Means for Stocks.\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-03-22 17:24 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.barrons.com/articles/the-market-isnt-fighting-the-fed-what-that-means-for-stocks-51616199228?mod=RTA><strong>Barrons</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>It’s supposed to be the battle of, if not this century, then at least this year—theFederal Reserve versus the bond market. But if it is, the Fed isn’t putting up much of a fight. If that remains the ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/the-market-isnt-fighting-the-fed-what-that-means-for-stocks-51616199228?mod=RTA\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/the-market-isnt-fighting-the-fed-what-that-means-for-stocks-51616199228?mod=RTA","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1101568126","content_text":"It’s supposed to be the battle of, if not this century, then at least this year—theFederal Reserve versus the bond market. But if it is, the Fed isn’t putting up much of a fight. If that remains the case, expect value stocks to remain the market’s winners.\nHeading into the Federal Open Market Committee meeting this past week, hopes were running high that Fed Chairman Jerome Powell would do something to slow the rise in bond yields. He did no such thing.\nSure, Powell reinforced the Fed’s pledge tokeep its benchmark short-term interest rates near zerothrough 2023, even as the central bank’s “dots”reflected economic growthof 6.5% in 2021. Little was said about the rise in the 10-year Treasury, which remained calm as Powell spoke.\nAnd then the selling started, with longer-term Treasuries leading the way. The 10-year’s yield had shot as high as 1.76% during the week before ending at 1.73% on Friday, causing theiShares 20+ Year Treasury Bondexchange-traded fund (ticker: TLT) to drop 1%. TheDow Jones Industrial Averagedeclined by 150.67 points, or 0.5%, to 32,627.97, while theS&P 500index fell 0.8%, to 3913.10, and theNasdaq Compositeslipped 0.8%, to 13215.24, as the most speculative tech stocks got hit.\nNot that the Fed would worry about these moves. If anything, it’s probably feeling pretty good about what’s happening. The surging 10-year has taken the wind out of the sails of highly valued companies, such asTesla(TSLA) andZoom Video Communications(ZM), and quietedbubble talkfor now. The amount of inflation priced into 10-year Treasury inflation-protected securities, or TIPS,sits at 2.27%, lower than the2.5% reflected in five-year TIPS, suggesting that the market accepts that the coming surge in inflation might actually be transitory.\nFinancial markets, meanwhile, aren’t pricing in a full tightening until 2023, observesDeutsche Bankstrategist Alan Ruskin, who argues that they would have been calling for higher rates as early as late 2021 under the previous monetary policy regime. “It is a common notion that the markets aren’t listening to the Fed, but fighting the Fed,” Ruskin writes. “The markets are listening, more than it might seem.”\nBesides, the Fed’s prime motivation is maintaining financial stability, and right now the rise in bond yields doesn’t appear to be having an impact. In fact, the spread between high-yield bonds and the equivalent Treasuries sits at 3.66 percentage points, 0.2 of a point lower than where it started the year, while spreads between triple-C-rated junk bonds and Treasuries have narrowed by 1.2 points.\n“Keep in mind, as long as credit spreads…are tight, the Fed has no real rush to stop yields from rising,” writes Larry McDonald, author of the Bear Traps Report newsletter. “When the selloff turns from a rotation out of tech, to everything selling off, they will take notice.”\nFor now that doesn’t seem to be the case. Sure, banks had a tough week, with theSPDR S&P BankETF (KBE) falling 2.1%, but it looks more like a short-lived response to the Fed’s decision to let apandemic-related loosening of the regulatory rules expire, not larger fundamental problems. TheEnergy Select Sector SPDRETF (XLE) dropped 7.5%, as oil briefly slid below $60. But that decline, too, looked more like a positioning problem, following a 71% rise since the end of October, rather than anything fundamental.\n“Concerns aboutslowing Asian demandare grabbing headlines, but we see the current soft patch as largely flows-driven, rather than fundamental distress,” writes RBC commodity strategist Michael Tran.\nIn fact, Thursday’s energy-sector selloff, while brutal, might not have been brutal enough to signal a bigger problem, according to Sundial Capital Research’s Dean Christians. It was certainly painful—every stock in the sector finished the day below its 10-day moving average. But 95% of the stocks were still trading above their 200-day moving averages, a sign of longer-term strength. That combination has happened just 12 times since 1980, and when it did, the sector traded higher six months later 82% of the time, with a median gain of 16%. “The group is short-term oversold in an uptrend,” Christians writes.\nSure, maybe the Fed eventually capitulates and pulls an Operation Twist out of its back pocket, or finds another way to keep yields from rising. But if Powell continues to back away from this fight, owning banks, energy, and other value stocks is one of the only ways to protect a portfolio.\nDon’t fight the Fed, especially if it’s not spoiling for a fight.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":627,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":350840172,"gmtCreate":1616194631496,"gmtModify":1704792008947,"author":{"id":"3574982978889356","authorId":"3574982978889356","name":"Faizztikuss","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d997b1472c0a74a79e4dcc956ed68e44","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574982978889356","authorIdStr":"3574982978889356"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"??","listText":"??","text":"??","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/350840172","repostId":"350047190","repostType":1,"repost":{"id":350047190,"gmtCreate":1616143511506,"gmtModify":1704791479419,"author":{"id":"20722186463466","authorId":"20722186463466","name":"爱发红包的虎妞","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/acf27be178fbc21279d1959ce5bec4e7","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"20722186463466","authorIdStr":"20722186463466"},"themes":[],"title":"知乎來嘍~快分享你剛換上的頭像框！","htmlText":"謝邀。人在老虎，剛上樓梯，年入5000虎幣，圈內熟人多，匿了！ 今天只是想告訴虎友們一個內幕：“知乎頭像框”上線啦！！  如何兌換頭像框呢？ 進入APP“我的”頁面，點擊“虎幣兌好禮”，點擊“更多福利”，“社區周邊”中選取“知乎頭像框”，兌換！ 只需要66虎幣噢！！   兌換之後，要選擇佩戴，就能在個人主頁看得到啦~ 如何佩戴頭像框？ 點擊頭像，進入“個人主頁”頁面，點擊“編輯”，點擊“頭像掛件”，選擇“知乎頭像框”佩戴即可。   Ps.&nbsp;換了新頭像後請在評論區集合，老規矩，虎妞準備隨機挑一些虎友報銷~ <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ZH\">$知乎(ZH)$</a>","listText":"謝邀。人在老虎，剛上樓梯，年入5000虎幣，圈內熟人多，匿了！ 今天只是想告訴虎友們一個內幕：“知乎頭像框”上線啦！！  如何兌換頭像框呢？ 進入APP“我的”頁面，點擊“虎幣兌好禮”，點擊“更多福利”，“社區周邊”中選取“知乎頭像框”，兌換！ 只需要66虎幣噢！！   兌換之後，要選擇佩戴，就能在個人主頁看得到啦~ 如何佩戴頭像框？ 點擊頭像，進入“個人主頁”頁面，點擊“編輯”，點擊“頭像掛件”，選擇“知乎頭像框”佩戴即可。   Ps.&nbsp;換了新頭像後請在評論區集合，老規矩，虎妞準備隨機挑一些虎友報銷~ <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ZH\">$知乎(ZH)$</a>","text":"謝邀。人在老虎，剛上樓梯，年入5000虎幣，圈內熟人多，匿了！ 今天只是想告訴虎友們一個內幕：“知乎頭像框”上線啦！！ 如何兌換頭像框呢？ 進入APP“我的”頁面，點擊“虎幣兌好禮”，點擊“更多福利”，“社區周邊”中選取“知乎頭像框”，兌換！ 只需要66虎幣噢！！ 兌換之後，要選擇佩戴，就能在個人主頁看得到啦~ 如何佩戴頭像框？ 點擊頭像，進入“個人主頁”頁面，點擊“編輯”，點擊“頭像掛件”，選擇“知乎頭像框”佩戴即可。 Ps. 換了新頭像後請在評論區集合，老規矩，虎妞準備隨機挑一些虎友報銷~ $知乎(ZH)$","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3063bddce9caf1e49d76936e86a5b03b","width":"600","height":"600"},{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ce754cb38b6b5cd21625701b49d516c1","width":"394","height":"838"},{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7907adc19a345b48e12a954867529023","width":"563","height":"525"}],"top":1,"highlighted":2,"essential":1,"paper":2,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/350047190","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":0,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":1,"subType":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":4,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":180,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":350857429,"gmtCreate":1616194545861,"gmtModify":1704792008463,"author":{"id":"3574982978889356","authorId":"3574982978889356","name":"Faizztikuss","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d997b1472c0a74a79e4dcc956ed68e44","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574982978889356","authorIdStr":"3574982978889356"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Gamestop keep increasing and decreasing&nbsp;","listText":"Gamestop keep increasing and decreasing&nbsp;","text":"Gamestop keep increasing and decreasing","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/350857429","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":207,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":350141292,"gmtCreate":1616169462916,"gmtModify":1704791882178,"author":{"id":"3574982978889356","authorId":"3574982978889356","name":"Faizztikuss","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d997b1472c0a74a79e4dcc956ed68e44","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574982978889356","authorIdStr":"3574982978889356"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Will wait for Nio to drop so I can buy more","listText":"Will wait for Nio to drop so I can buy more","text":"Will wait for Nio to drop so I can buy more","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/350141292","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":208,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":327201596,"gmtCreate":1616083544815,"gmtModify":1704790837499,"author":{"id":"3574982978889356","authorId":"3574982978889356","name":"Faizztikuss","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d997b1472c0a74a79e4dcc956ed68e44","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574982978889356","authorIdStr":"3574982978889356"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Nio please go up ?","listText":"Nio please go up ?","text":"Nio please go up ?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/327201596","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":482,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":321320811,"gmtCreate":1615395695933,"gmtModify":1704782279219,"author":{"id":"3574982978889356","authorId":"3574982978889356","name":"Faizztikuss","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d997b1472c0a74a79e4dcc956ed68e44","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574982978889356","authorIdStr":"3574982978889356"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Stonks","listText":"Stonks","text":"Stonks","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/321320811","repostId":"2118672048","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2118672048","pubTimestamp":1615391767,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2118672048?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-03-10 23:56","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why AMC Entertainment Stock Popped (Again) Before Earnings","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2118672048","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"One analyst says it's time to sell AMC -- but investors are ignoring that advice.","content":"<h2>What happened</h2>\n<p>Movie theater chain owner and certified meme stock <b>AMC Entertainment </b>(NYSE:AMC) reports its Q4 earnings this evening. Analysts aren't optimistic (indeed, as you'll see, some are decidedly <i>pessimistic</i>) about its chances, forecasting a $3.61-per-share loss for the quarter on an 89% revenue decline -- but investors don't care.</p>\n<p>They're bidding AMC shares up, and the stock has already risen 15.2% through 10:20 a.m. EST.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/79229b05289dd91daed033d24bb89dd0\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\"><span>Image source: Getty Images.</span></p>\n<h2>So what</h2>\n<p>Not all investors are so enthusiastic, though. In fact, just hours before the report, analysts at independent equity research firm LightShed Partners released a sell rating for AMC stock this morning.</p>\n<p>The \"future of movie-going is not in doubt,\" opined the analyst in a note covered by TheFly.com. Once the pandemic goes away, folks will return to theaters to watch movies on the big screen. But the same may not be true for AMC.</p>\n<p>\"The future of AMC Theaters, however, is very much in doubt,\" warns the analyst, because AMC is \"over-levered\" with more than $11.3 billion in debt, cash poor, and unable to earn much more cash until people feel comfortable coming back to the theater.</p>\n<h2>Now what</h2>\n<p>Of course, that's probably what investors are betting on this morning. With coronavirus still in full swing, the chances of AMC reporting a profit this evening are vanishingly small. What might happen, though, is that management might say something optimistic about the future, something that might keep hope alive that AMC will survive, as opposed to just going bankrupt and then reorganizing itself to resume doing business once the pandemic has passed.</p>\n<p>LightShed thinks that's the more likely scenario, I fear, and values AMC's chances of surviving the recession at no more than $0.01 per share.</p>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why AMC Entertainment Stock Popped (Again) Before Earnings</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy AMC Entertainment Stock Popped (Again) Before Earnings\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-03-10 23:56 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/03/10/why-amc-entertainment-stock-popped-again-before-ea/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>What happened\nMovie theater chain owner and certified meme stock AMC Entertainment (NYSE:AMC) reports its Q4 earnings this evening. Analysts aren't optimistic (indeed, as you'll see, some are ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/03/10/why-amc-entertainment-stock-popped-again-before-ea/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AMC":"AMC院线"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/03/10/why-amc-entertainment-stock-popped-again-before-ea/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2118672048","content_text":"What happened\nMovie theater chain owner and certified meme stock AMC Entertainment (NYSE:AMC) reports its Q4 earnings this evening. Analysts aren't optimistic (indeed, as you'll see, some are decidedly pessimistic) about its chances, forecasting a $3.61-per-share loss for the quarter on an 89% revenue decline -- but investors don't care.\nThey're bidding AMC shares up, and the stock has already risen 15.2% through 10:20 a.m. EST.\nImage source: Getty Images.\nSo what\nNot all investors are so enthusiastic, though. In fact, just hours before the report, analysts at independent equity research firm LightShed Partners released a sell rating for AMC stock this morning.\nThe \"future of movie-going is not in doubt,\" opined the analyst in a note covered by TheFly.com. Once the pandemic goes away, folks will return to theaters to watch movies on the big screen. But the same may not be true for AMC.\n\"The future of AMC Theaters, however, is very much in doubt,\" warns the analyst, because AMC is \"over-levered\" with more than $11.3 billion in debt, cash poor, and unable to earn much more cash until people feel comfortable coming back to the theater.\nNow what\nOf course, that's probably what investors are betting on this morning. With coronavirus still in full swing, the chances of AMC reporting a profit this evening are vanishingly small. What might happen, though, is that management might say something optimistic about the future, something that might keep hope alive that AMC will survive, as opposed to just going bankrupt and then reorganizing itself to resume doing business once the pandemic has passed.\nLightShed thinks that's the more likely scenario, I fear, and values AMC's chances of surviving the recession at no more than $0.01 per share.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":160,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}