Valzard personal page - To The Moon

Valzard

Valzard

No personal profile

20Follow

1Followers

0Topic

0Badge

2021-02-19

$Puget Technologies Inc(PUGE)$just bought 1 mil shares on the dip. sleeper op stock here. The time is now! You snooze you lose

2021-03-05

$ENDRA Life Sciences Inc(NDRA)$now's your chance to double down on the dip!!

2021-02-26

you snooze you lose

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2021-02-26

??

Hong Kong stocks post worst week in one year as bond yields surge

2021-02-26

??

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2021-02-19

what a wonderful pick!

@redcandless:$Adaptive Medias, Inc.(ADTM)$green among the sea of red! Wonder if it can pull through and be a superstar!

2021-02-23

so sad!

After the GameStop fiasco, momentum builds for an $800 billion tax

2021-02-19

nice!

22 additional dividend stocks that Warren Buffett might consider buying

Go to Tiger App to see more news

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"userPageInfo":{"id":3575877197345409,"uuid":"3575877197345409","gmtCreate":1612784134469,"gmtModify":1613702700385,"name":"Valzard","pinyin":"valzard","introduction":"","introductionEn":null,"signature":"","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/26b5dd21038b5777aaaba5568d2ce70c","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":1,"headSize":20,"tweetSize":8,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":1,"name":"萌萌虎","nameTw":"萌萌虎","represent":"呱呱坠地","factor":"评论帖子3次或发布1条主帖（非转发）","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":"success","userBadges":[{"badgeId":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493-2","templateUuid":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493","name":"Senior Tiger","description":"Join the tiger community for 1000 days","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0063fb68ea29c9ae6858c58630e182d5","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/96c699a93be4214d4b49aea6a5a5d1a4","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/35b0e542a9ff77046ed69ef602bc105d","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.11.06","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789-1","templateUuid":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789","name":"Knowledgeable Investor","description":"Traded more than 10 stocks","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e74cc24115c4fbae6154ec1b1041bf47","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d48265cbfd97c57f9048db29f22227b0","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76c6d6898b073c77e1c537ebe9ac1c57","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1102},{"badgeId":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84-1","templateUuid":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84","name":"Real Trader","description":"Completed a transaction","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":3,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":null,"starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"hot","tweets":[{"id":367097901,"gmtCreate":1614882950703,"gmtModify":1704776578310,"author":{"id":"3575877197345409","authorId":"3575877197345409","authorIdStr":"3575877197345409","name":"Valzard","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/26b5dd21038b5777aaaba5568d2ce70c","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3575877197345409"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NDRA\">$ENDRA Life Sciences Inc(NDRA)$</a>now's your chance to double down on the dip!!&nbsp;","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NDRA\">$ENDRA Life Sciences Inc(NDRA)$</a>now's your chance to double down on the dip!!&nbsp;","text":"$ENDRA Life Sciences Inc(NDRA)$now's your chance to double down on the dip!!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/367097901","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":300,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":368583262,"gmtCreate":1614337940356,"gmtModify":1704770860869,"author":{"id":"3575877197345409","authorId":"3575877197345409","authorIdStr":"3575877197345409","name":"Valzard","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/26b5dd21038b5777aaaba5568d2ce70c","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3575877197345409"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"you snooze you lose&nbsp;","listText":"you snooze you lose&nbsp;","text":"you snooze you lose","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/368583262","repostId":"2114326273","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":356,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":368589637,"gmtCreate":1614337880729,"gmtModify":1704770859575,"author":{"id":"3575877197345409","authorId":"3575877197345409","authorIdStr":"3575877197345409","name":"Valzard","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/26b5dd21038b5777aaaba5568d2ce70c","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3575877197345409"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"??","listText":"??","text":"??","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/368589637","repostId":"2114376536","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2114376536","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1614329346,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2114376536?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-02-26 16:49","market":"hk","language":"en","title":"Hong Kong stocks post worst week in one year as bond yields surge","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2114376536","media":"Reuters","summary":"Feb 26 (Reuters) - Hong Kong stocks ended sharply lower on Friday, in line with broader markets, pos","content":"<p>Feb 26 (Reuters) - Hong Kong stocks ended sharply lower on Friday, in line with broader markets, posting their worst week in one year, as a rout in global bonds sent yields flying and dampened appetite for risky assets.</p>\n<p>The Hang Seng index fell 3.6% to 28,980.21, while the China Enterprises Index lost 4.0% to 11,247.21 points.</p>\n<p>For the week, HSI tumbled 5.4%, while HSCE slumped 7.1%, both logging their steepest drops since the week to March 13, 2020.</p>\n<p>Yields on the 10-year Treasury note eased back to 1.494% from a one-year high of 1.614%, but were still up 40 basis points for the month in their biggest move since 2016.</p>\n<p>Adding to the pressure were worries over Sino-U.S. trade relations.</p>\n<p>Katherine Tai, President Joe Biden's top trade nominee, backed tariffs as a \"legitimate tool\" to counter China's state-driven economic model and vowed to hold Beijing to its prior commitments.</p>\n<p>This week's retreat also came after a stamp duty hike that hit sentiment hard and deterred southbound funds.</p>\n<p>The stamp duty will rise to 0.13% of the value of the transaction from the current 0.1% on Aug. 1, Hong Kong Financial Secretary Paul Chan announced in his annual budget speech.</p>\n<p>\"It's an asset class type rotation now that you really looking at, because there's nothing that's impervious to the sell-off,\" said Andy Maynard, head of equities at China Renaissance in Hong Kong.</p>\n<p>\"Southbound (money) is cautious now. The day before yesterday was record selling for them and where they haven't had a sale day since 2021 started. So, you got to feel that we are probably in the crosshairs of complete or a healthy correction\", he added.</p>\n<p>Mainland investors sold a net HK$3.1 billion ($399.68 million) of Hong Kong shares via the Stock Connect on Friday, according to Refinitiv data, following a daily record outflow of HK$20 billion on Wednesday.</p>\n<p>($1 = 7.7563 Hong Kong dollars)</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Hong Kong stocks post worst week in one year as bond yields surge</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHong Kong stocks post worst week in one year as bond yields surge\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-02-26 16:49</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Feb 26 (Reuters) - Hong Kong stocks ended sharply lower on Friday, in line with broader markets, posting their worst week in one year, as a rout in global bonds sent yields flying and dampened appetite for risky assets.</p>\n<p>The Hang Seng index fell 3.6% to 28,980.21, while the China Enterprises Index lost 4.0% to 11,247.21 points.</p>\n<p>For the week, HSI tumbled 5.4%, while HSCE slumped 7.1%, both logging their steepest drops since the week to March 13, 2020.</p>\n<p>Yields on the 10-year Treasury note eased back to 1.494% from a one-year high of 1.614%, but were still up 40 basis points for the month in their biggest move since 2016.</p>\n<p>Adding to the pressure were worries over Sino-U.S. trade relations.</p>\n<p>Katherine Tai, President Joe Biden's top trade nominee, backed tariffs as a \"legitimate tool\" to counter China's state-driven economic model and vowed to hold Beijing to its prior commitments.</p>\n<p>This week's retreat also came after a stamp duty hike that hit sentiment hard and deterred southbound funds.</p>\n<p>The stamp duty will rise to 0.13% of the value of the transaction from the current 0.1% on Aug. 1, Hong Kong Financial Secretary Paul Chan announced in his annual budget speech.</p>\n<p>\"It's an asset class type rotation now that you really looking at, because there's nothing that's impervious to the sell-off,\" said Andy Maynard, head of equities at China Renaissance in Hong Kong.</p>\n<p>\"Southbound (money) is cautious now. The day before yesterday was record selling for them and where they haven't had a sale day since 2021 started. So, you got to feel that we are probably in the crosshairs of complete or a healthy correction\", he added.</p>\n<p>Mainland investors sold a net HK$3.1 billion ($399.68 million) of Hong Kong shares via the Stock Connect on Friday, according to Refinitiv data, following a daily record outflow of HK$20 billion on Wednesday.</p>\n<p>($1 = 7.7563 Hong Kong dollars)</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"HSCCI":"红筹指数","HSI":"恒生指数","HSCEI":"国企指数"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2114376536","content_text":"Feb 26 (Reuters) - Hong Kong stocks ended sharply lower on Friday, in line with broader markets, posting their worst week in one year, as a rout in global bonds sent yields flying and dampened appetite for risky assets.\nThe Hang Seng index fell 3.6% to 28,980.21, while the China Enterprises Index lost 4.0% to 11,247.21 points.\nFor the week, HSI tumbled 5.4%, while HSCE slumped 7.1%, both logging their steepest drops since the week to March 13, 2020.\nYields on the 10-year Treasury note eased back to 1.494% from a one-year high of 1.614%, but were still up 40 basis points for the month in their biggest move since 2016.\nAdding to the pressure were worries over Sino-U.S. trade relations.\nKatherine Tai, President Joe Biden's top trade nominee, backed tariffs as a \"legitimate tool\" to counter China's state-driven economic model and vowed to hold Beijing to its prior commitments.\nThis week's retreat also came after a stamp duty hike that hit sentiment hard and deterred southbound funds.\nThe stamp duty will rise to 0.13% of the value of the transaction from the current 0.1% on Aug. 1, Hong Kong Financial Secretary Paul Chan announced in his annual budget speech.\n\"It's an asset class type rotation now that you really looking at, because there's nothing that's impervious to the sell-off,\" said Andy Maynard, head of equities at China Renaissance in Hong Kong.\n\"Southbound (money) is cautious now. The day before yesterday was record selling for them and where they haven't had a sale day since 2021 started. So, you got to feel that we are probably in the crosshairs of complete or a healthy correction\", he added.\nMainland investors sold a net HK$3.1 billion ($399.68 million) of Hong Kong shares via the Stock Connect on Friday, according to Refinitiv data, following a daily record outflow of HK$20 billion on Wednesday.\n($1 = 7.7563 Hong Kong dollars)","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":595,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":368589973,"gmtCreate":1614337847792,"gmtModify":1704770859086,"author":{"id":"3575877197345409","authorId":"3575877197345409","authorIdStr":"3575877197345409","name":"Valzard","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/26b5dd21038b5777aaaba5568d2ce70c","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3575877197345409"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"??","listText":"??","text":"??","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/368589973","repostId":"2114343228","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":224,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":369587409,"gmtCreate":1614059782601,"gmtModify":1704887455586,"author":{"id":"3575877197345409","authorId":"3575877197345409","authorIdStr":"3575877197345409","name":"Valzard","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/26b5dd21038b5777aaaba5568d2ce70c","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3575877197345409"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"so sad!","listText":"so sad!","text":"so sad!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/369587409","repostId":"1129494437","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1129494437","pubTimestamp":1614048165,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1129494437?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-02-23 10:42","market":"us","language":"en","title":"After the GameStop fiasco, momentum builds for an $800 billion tax","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1129494437","media":"CNN Business","summary":"New York (CNN Business)-Uncle Sam is in search for a pot of gold that could ease the pain of trillio","content":"<p><b>New York (CNN Business)-</b>Uncle Sam is in search for a pot of gold that could ease the pain of trillion-dollar deficits. And some believe Wall Street might just have the answer.</p>\n<p>For more than a decade, progressives have&nbsp;tried and failed to impose a financial transaction tax.But there is new momentum for such a levy as the&nbsp;national debt skyrockets&nbsp;during the pandemic and in the wake of the&nbsp;GameStop trading frenzy&nbsp;that&nbsp;shined a bright light market structure concerns.</p>\n<p>The White House told CNN Business on Sunday&nbsp;that a financial transaction tax on GameStop-like trading deserves additional study and can be part of a greater evaluation of such a tax for revenue and market stability. The leading proposal amounts to a $1 tax on every $1,000 of transactions.</p>\n<p>But there is a deep divide over the wisdom of a financial transaction tax. Progressives see it as a smart way to simultaneously curb predatory trading while funding ambitious programs aimed at easing America's inequality problem.Opponents, on the other hand, paint a financial transaction tax (FTT) as a nightmare. Wall Street, which would take a hit, is already warning such a levy&nbsp;would backfire on Main Street&nbsp;by raising trading costs and depressing market liquidity.</p>\n<p>\"The odds are still against a financial transaction tax being enacted, but for the first time in a decade this proposal should be considered as a viable policy option rather than just another talking point,\" said Isaac Boltansky, director of policy research at Compass Point Research &amp; Trading.</p>\n<p>Last week, House Financial Services Chairwoman Maxine Waters said she's \"very interested\" and \"certainly looking at\" a financial transaction tax.</p>\n<p><b>'Mindboggling' concentration of wealth</b></p>\n<p>Lawmakers will surely be tempted to tax transactions because it could raise vast sums of money at a time when Washington is strapped for cash.</p>\n<p>A 0.1% tax on stock, bond and derivative transactions&nbsp;could raise $777 billion for the federal government over a decade, according to a 2018 estimate by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office.</p>\n<p>\"We have tremendous income inequality in our society and a giant deficit. A financial transaction tax would be an incredibly efficient and progressive way to raise revenue,\" Aaron Klein, a former Treasury Department official in the Obama administration, told CNN Business.</p>\n<p>The top 1% of American households would pay 40% of the total amount of the tax, while the bottom 60% would pay just over 11%, according to the&nbsp;Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center.</p>\n<p>That makes sense because the wealthiest 10% of US households owned 87% of all stocks and mutual funds, according to&nbsp;2020 data from the Federal Reserve.</p>\n<p>\"The concentration of wealth in the stock market is mindboggling,\" said Klein, who is now a senior fellow of economic studies at the Brookings Institution.</p>\n<p>Even though some argue an FTT would be a disaster, the United States already has a tax, albeit a very tiny one. Roughly 2 cents per $1,000 traded goes toward&nbsp;funding the budget of the Securities and Exchange Commission.Due to surging trading volume during the pandemic, the&nbsp;tax rate to fund the SEC is being lowered&nbsp;to just half a cent per $1,000 starting Thursday.</p>\n<p>\"There is a fee today and the world hasn't ended,\" said Dennis Kelleher, CEO of Better Markets, a group that lobbies for tougher oversight of Wall Street. \"The proposed fee is so puny that no reasonable retail investor would ever notice it.\"</p>\n<p><b>'Unintended consequences'</b></p>\n<p>The financial industry is arguing the exact opposite.</p>\n<p>They say even a 0.1% levy on transactions will cause market players to pass the costs on to consumers and make it harder to buy and sell securities by decreasing liquidity, which measures how easy it is to buy and sell securities. Some Wall Street firms could even try to move their operations outside the country to avoid the tax. The&nbsp;New York Stock Exchange recently threatened to flee&nbsp;New York,possibly for Texas, in response to transaction taxes mulled by Albany.</p>\n<p>\"This approach has a long history of unintended consequences that will penalize workers, pensioners and American families,\" a spokesperson for the Coalition to Prevent the Taxing of Retirement Savings told CNN Business.</p>\n<p>That coalition includes the NYSE,Nasdaq&nbsp;(NDAQ)&nbsp;and&nbsp;UBS&nbsp;(UBS). Citadel Securities andVirtu Financial(VIRT), two high-speed trading firms that would be hurt by a financial transaction tax, are also members.</p>\n<p>\"An FTT will increase trading costs for investors — including individuals — undermine the competitiveness of our capital markets and harm the US economy just as we work to recover from this pandemic,\" the spokesperson said.</p>\n<p><b>Some countries tried and failed</b></p>\n<p>James Angel, a Georgetown University professor who specializes in market structure and regulation,authored a Chamber of Commerce-funded paper in 2019&nbsp;that found a financial transaction tax would hurt Main Street by driving up the cost of trading by more than the amount of the tax.</p>\n<p>\"There is no such thing as a tiny tax that raises big revenue,\" Angel said in an interview.</p>\n<p>He pointed to how some other countries, most notably Sweden in the 1980s, abandoned such taxes after trading volume vanished and revenue underwhelmed. (Of course, the United States, with its deep financial markets, massive economy and the world's reserve currency, is not Sweden.)</p>\n<p>\"It really messes up the market,\" Angel said.</p>\n<p>If US trading volumes fell sharply, the FTT wouldn't raise nearly as much as the $777 billion the CBO estimates.</p>\n<p>Greg Valliere, chief US policy strategist at AGF Investments, said the chances of a financial transaction tax are \"very slim\" because moderate Democrats would be unlikely to back it.</p>\n<p>\"It would be a disaster. It's a pandora's box that should not be opened,\" Valliere said.</p>\n<p>Of course, it's possible that FTT proposals in Congress get scaled back, including by lowering the rate or excluding smaller blocks of trades.</p>\n<p><b>Leveling the playing field</b></p>\n<p>During last week's congressional hearing on GameStop and Robinhood, Citadel Securities founder&nbsp;Ken Griffin warned a tax would boomerang.</p>\n<p>\"We firmly believe a financial transaction tax would injure Americans trying to save for retirement,\" Griffin said.</p>\n<p>Klein, the Brookings Institution fellow, called Griffin's comments a \"self-serving lie\" because high-frequency trading firms like his would be among those hurt.</p>\n<p>The GameStop trading frenzy drew attention onto how Robinhood was able to bring zero-commission trading to the masses.</p>\n<p>Through a&nbsp;controversial practice known as payment for order flow, Robinhood and other brokers get paid to route retail trades through market makers like Citadel Securities.</p>\n<p>Payment for order flow has made it cheap and easy to trade. However, critics say it's really Wall Street that is getting the better end of the deal by skimming pennies off each trade and racing ahead of retail orders to make a profit.</p>\n<p>\"We believe the markets today are rigged to favor high-frequency traders,\" said Kelleher, the Better Markets CEO. \"The industry has taken visible upfront commission fees and disguised it into invisible payment for order flow.\"</p>\n<p>In other words, it's not really free to trade.</p>\n<p>Kelleher thinks Congress should focus on taxing orders, not transactions, because a&nbsp;staggering amount of all stock trade orders(some estimates&nbsp;say 99%) are canceled because of high-frequency trading strategies. Critics say those orders are evidence that high-speed traders are manipulating the market by creating the appearance of demand where there is none.</p>\n<p>\"A financial fee on orders could be the death knell for predatory high frequency trading,\" he said. \"Everyone will be better off — except for the predators.\"</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>After the GameStop fiasco, momentum builds for an $800 billion tax</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAfter the GameStop fiasco, momentum builds for an $800 billion tax\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-02-23 10:42 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://edition.cnn.com/2021/02/22/investing/gamestop-financial-transaction-tax/index.html><strong>CNN Business</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>New York (CNN Business)-Uncle Sam is in search for a pot of gold that could ease the pain of trillion-dollar deficits. And some believe Wall Street might just have the answer.\nFor more than a decade, ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://edition.cnn.com/2021/02/22/investing/gamestop-financial-transaction-tax/index.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"GME":"游戏驿站",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://edition.cnn.com/2021/02/22/investing/gamestop-financial-transaction-tax/index.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1129494437","content_text":"New York (CNN Business)-Uncle Sam is in search for a pot of gold that could ease the pain of trillion-dollar deficits. And some believe Wall Street might just have the answer.\nFor more than a decade, progressives have tried and failed to impose a financial transaction tax.But there is new momentum for such a levy as the national debt skyrockets during the pandemic and in the wake of the GameStop trading frenzy that shined a bright light market structure concerns.\nThe White House told CNN Business on Sunday that a financial transaction tax on GameStop-like trading deserves additional study and can be part of a greater evaluation of such a tax for revenue and market stability. The leading proposal amounts to a $1 tax on every $1,000 of transactions.\nBut there is a deep divide over the wisdom of a financial transaction tax. Progressives see it as a smart way to simultaneously curb predatory trading while funding ambitious programs aimed at easing America's inequality problem.Opponents, on the other hand, paint a financial transaction tax (FTT) as a nightmare. Wall Street, which would take a hit, is already warning such a levy would backfire on Main Street by raising trading costs and depressing market liquidity.\n\"The odds are still against a financial transaction tax being enacted, but for the first time in a decade this proposal should be considered as a viable policy option rather than just another talking point,\" said Isaac Boltansky, director of policy research at Compass Point Research & Trading.\nLast week, House Financial Services Chairwoman Maxine Waters said she's \"very interested\" and \"certainly looking at\" a financial transaction tax.\n'Mindboggling' concentration of wealth\nLawmakers will surely be tempted to tax transactions because it could raise vast sums of money at a time when Washington is strapped for cash.\nA 0.1% tax on stock, bond and derivative transactions could raise $777 billion for the federal government over a decade, according to a 2018 estimate by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office.\n\"We have tremendous income inequality in our society and a giant deficit. A financial transaction tax would be an incredibly efficient and progressive way to raise revenue,\" Aaron Klein, a former Treasury Department official in the Obama administration, told CNN Business.\nThe top 1% of American households would pay 40% of the total amount of the tax, while the bottom 60% would pay just over 11%, according to the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center.\nThat makes sense because the wealthiest 10% of US households owned 87% of all stocks and mutual funds, according to 2020 data from the Federal Reserve.\n\"The concentration of wealth in the stock market is mindboggling,\" said Klein, who is now a senior fellow of economic studies at the Brookings Institution.\nEven though some argue an FTT would be a disaster, the United States already has a tax, albeit a very tiny one. Roughly 2 cents per $1,000 traded goes toward funding the budget of the Securities and Exchange Commission.Due to surging trading volume during the pandemic, the tax rate to fund the SEC is being lowered to just half a cent per $1,000 starting Thursday.\n\"There is a fee today and the world hasn't ended,\" said Dennis Kelleher, CEO of Better Markets, a group that lobbies for tougher oversight of Wall Street. \"The proposed fee is so puny that no reasonable retail investor would ever notice it.\"\n'Unintended consequences'\nThe financial industry is arguing the exact opposite.\nThey say even a 0.1% levy on transactions will cause market players to pass the costs on to consumers and make it harder to buy and sell securities by decreasing liquidity, which measures how easy it is to buy and sell securities. Some Wall Street firms could even try to move their operations outside the country to avoid the tax. The New York Stock Exchange recently threatened to flee New York,possibly for Texas, in response to transaction taxes mulled by Albany.\n\"This approach has a long history of unintended consequences that will penalize workers, pensioners and American families,\" a spokesperson for the Coalition to Prevent the Taxing of Retirement Savings told CNN Business.\nThat coalition includes the NYSE,Nasdaq (NDAQ) and UBS (UBS). Citadel Securities andVirtu Financial(VIRT), two high-speed trading firms that would be hurt by a financial transaction tax, are also members.\n\"An FTT will increase trading costs for investors — including individuals — undermine the competitiveness of our capital markets and harm the US economy just as we work to recover from this pandemic,\" the spokesperson said.\nSome countries tried and failed\nJames Angel, a Georgetown University professor who specializes in market structure and regulation,authored a Chamber of Commerce-funded paper in 2019 that found a financial transaction tax would hurt Main Street by driving up the cost of trading by more than the amount of the tax.\n\"There is no such thing as a tiny tax that raises big revenue,\" Angel said in an interview.\nHe pointed to how some other countries, most notably Sweden in the 1980s, abandoned such taxes after trading volume vanished and revenue underwhelmed. (Of course, the United States, with its deep financial markets, massive economy and the world's reserve currency, is not Sweden.)\n\"It really messes up the market,\" Angel said.\nIf US trading volumes fell sharply, the FTT wouldn't raise nearly as much as the $777 billion the CBO estimates.\nGreg Valliere, chief US policy strategist at AGF Investments, said the chances of a financial transaction tax are \"very slim\" because moderate Democrats would be unlikely to back it.\n\"It would be a disaster. It's a pandora's box that should not be opened,\" Valliere said.\nOf course, it's possible that FTT proposals in Congress get scaled back, including by lowering the rate or excluding smaller blocks of trades.\nLeveling the playing field\nDuring last week's congressional hearing on GameStop and Robinhood, Citadel Securities founder Ken Griffin warned a tax would boomerang.\n\"We firmly believe a financial transaction tax would injure Americans trying to save for retirement,\" Griffin said.\nKlein, the Brookings Institution fellow, called Griffin's comments a \"self-serving lie\" because high-frequency trading firms like his would be among those hurt.\nThe GameStop trading frenzy drew attention onto how Robinhood was able to bring zero-commission trading to the masses.\nThrough a controversial practice known as payment for order flow, Robinhood and other brokers get paid to route retail trades through market makers like Citadel Securities.\nPayment for order flow has made it cheap and easy to trade. However, critics say it's really Wall Street that is getting the better end of the deal by skimming pennies off each trade and racing ahead of retail orders to make a profit.\n\"We believe the markets today are rigged to favor high-frequency traders,\" said Kelleher, the Better Markets CEO. \"The industry has taken visible upfront commission fees and disguised it into invisible payment for order flow.\"\nIn other words, it's not really free to trade.\nKelleher thinks Congress should focus on taxing orders, not transactions, because a staggering amount of all stock trade orders(some estimates say 99%) are canceled because of high-frequency trading strategies. Critics say those orders are evidence that high-speed traders are manipulating the market by creating the appearance of demand where there is none.\n\"A financial fee on orders could be the death knell for predatory high frequency trading,\" he said. \"Everyone will be better off — except for the predators.\"","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":198,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":387140812,"gmtCreate":1613730772836,"gmtModify":1704884256125,"author":{"id":"3575877197345409","authorId":"3575877197345409","authorIdStr":"3575877197345409","name":"Valzard","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/26b5dd21038b5777aaaba5568d2ce70c","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3575877197345409"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"what a wonderful pick!&nbsp;","listText":"what a wonderful pick!&nbsp;","text":"what a wonderful pick!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/387140812","repostId":"384436890","repostType":1,"repost":{"id":384436890,"gmtCreate":1613665033410,"gmtModify":1704883515718,"author":{"id":"3570777781144612","authorId":"3570777781144612","authorIdStr":"3570777781144612","name":"redcandless","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570777781144612"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ADTM\">$Adaptive Medias, Inc.(ADTM)$</a>green among the sea of red! Wonder if it can pull through and be a superstar!","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ADTM\">$Adaptive Medias, Inc.(ADTM)$</a>green among the sea of red! Wonder if it can pull through and be a superstar!","text":"$Adaptive Medias, Inc.(ADTM)$green among the sea of red! Wonder if it can pull through and be a superstar!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/384436890","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":0,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":345,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":384423012,"gmtCreate":1613669183736,"gmtModify":1704883562109,"author":{"id":"3575877197345409","authorId":"3575877197345409","authorIdStr":"3575877197345409","name":"Valzard","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/26b5dd21038b5777aaaba5568d2ce70c","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3575877197345409"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PUGE\">$Puget Technologies Inc(PUGE)$</a>just bought 1 mil shares on the dip. sleeper op stock here. The time is&nbsp;now! You&nbsp;snooze you lose","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PUGE\">$Puget Technologies Inc(PUGE)$</a>just bought 1 mil shares on the dip. sleeper op stock here. The time is&nbsp;now! You&nbsp;snooze you lose","text":"$Puget Technologies Inc(PUGE)$just bought 1 mil shares on the dip. sleeper op stock here. The time is now! You snooze you lose","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/384423012","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":423,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":384420348,"gmtCreate":1613668926584,"gmtModify":1704883560494,"author":{"id":"3575877197345409","authorId":"3575877197345409","authorIdStr":"3575877197345409","name":"Valzard","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/26b5dd21038b5777aaaba5568d2ce70c","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3575877197345409"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"nice!&nbsp;","listText":"nice!&nbsp;","text":"nice!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/384420348","repostId":"1124565484","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1124565484","pubTimestamp":1613631190,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1124565484?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-02-18 14:53","market":"us","language":"en","title":"22 additional dividend stocks that Warren Buffett might consider buying","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1124565484","media":"MarketWatch","summary":"His Berkshire Hathaway conglomerate recently started buying shares of Verizon and Chevron — both hav","content":"<blockquote><b>His Berkshire Hathaway conglomerate recently started buying shares of Verizon and Chevron — both have attractive dividend yields well-supported by expected cash flow.</b></blockquote><p>A vote of confidence by Warren Buffett in a particular stock doesn’t mean you should jump on the bandwagon, but the Berkshire Hathaway CEO’s long-term track record speaks for itself. The man knows how to spot a bargain.</p><p>Below is a screen of stocks inspired by Buffett’s two new picks that feature attractive dividend yields that are expected to be well-covered by free cash flow.</p><p>Word of Buffett’s new investment positions can send shares higher as other investors’ ears perk up. This happened after Berkshire Hathaway Inc.BRKdisclosed late Feb. 16 that it had purchased shares of Verizon Communications Inc.VZ.and Chevron Corp.CVX— two stocks with attractive dividend yields, one of which is cheaply priced when compared to the weighted valuation of the S&amp;P 500 IndexSPX.</p><p>Shares of Verizon were up 3% in early trading Feb. 17, while Chevron was up 3.5%. With dividends reinvested, Verizon had declined 7% for 2021 through Feb. 16, following a flat performance in 2020. Chevron was up 1.5% early Feb. 17 and had already risen 12% for 2021 following a 26% decline in 2020. Oil is on the upswing as investors look ahead to life after the pandemic. West Texas Intermediate crude oilCRUDE OILhad risen 68% from the close on Oct. 31 through Feb. 16, when it settled at $60.05 a barrel.</p><p>All of the following is based on closing prices Feb. 16 and consensus estimates among analysts polled by FactSet for the next 12 months.</p><p>Verizon’s stock trades at a forward price-to-earnings ratio of 10.7, compared to a weighted aggregate forward P/E of 22.5 for the S&amp;P 500. The shares have a dividend yield of 4.64%.</p><p>One way to gauge a company’s ability to cover its dividend (and hopefully raise it) is to look at its free cash flow, which is its remaining cash flow after planned capital expenditures. This is money that can be used for any corporate purpose, including expansion, share repurchases or dividend increases. We can measure a company’s free cash flow yield by dividing trailing or estimated free cash flow by the current share price. Because of the disruptions to the U.S. economy in 2020, all the free cash flow yields that follow make use of consensus estimates for the next 12 reported months.</p><p>Verizion’s forward free cash flow yield is 8.97%, showing “headroom” of 4.34% over the current dividend.</p><p>Chevron’s stock trades at a forward P/E ratio of 24.8, which is higher than that of the S&amp;P 500. Then again, 2021 is expected to be a recovery year for oil and natural gas, and analysts’ earnings estimates may not have caught up with rising fuel commodity prices. Chevron’s dividend yield is 5.54% and its forward free cash flow yield is 7.99%, leaving “headroom” of 2.45%.</p><p>None of this is to say that Buffett is overly fixated on stocks with high dividend yields. He isn’t. Among the publicly traded holdings the company disclosed Feb. 16, there are plenty of companies that pay no dividends, including Amazon.com Inc.AMZN,Biogen Inc.BIIB,Charter Communications Inc.CHTRand General Motors Co.GM,which suspended its quarterly dividend in April.</p><p><b>A Buffett dividend stock screen</b></p><p>Working from Buffett’s selections of Verizon and Chevron and excluding stocks Berkshire Hathaway doesn’t already hold, here are the 22 stocks among the S&amp;P 500 with dividend yields of at least 4.00%, for which free cash flow estimates for calendar 2021 are available, with headroom indicated. The list is sorted by dividend yield.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fc941b397e252f4198fa8bb425fa2bbb\" tg-width=\"666\" tg-height=\"762\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">Scroll the table to see all the data, including forward P/E ratios and total returns for 2021 and 2020.</p><p>For real estate investment trusts, the industry standard for measuring dividend-paying ability is funds from operations, a non-GAAP figure that adds depreciation and amortization back to earnings and subtracts gains on the sale of property. So forward FFO estimates are used in the “estimated FCF yield” column on the table.</p><p>The list excludes four stocks already held by Berkshire Hathaway — Verizon, Chevron and two more:</p><ul><li>AbbVie Inc.ABBVhas a dividend yield of 4.99%, with a forward free cash flow yield of 10.54% for headroom of 5.55%.</li><li>Kraft Heinz Co.KHChas a dividend yield of 4.52% and a forward free cash flow yield of 7.59% for headroom of 3.06%. The company cut its dividend by more than a third in February 2019.</li></ul><p>A high dividend yield might indicate investors are sour on the company’s business prospects or its ability to maintain the dividend over the long term, despite a high FCF yield. For example, the highest-yielding stock on the list is Lumen Technologies Inc.LUMN,which was CenturyLink before it was renamed in September. The dividend yield is 8.48%. CenturyLinkcut its quarterly dividend by 26% on the same day it authorized a $2 billion stock repurchase planin February 2013. The company’s quarterly dividend remained 54 cents a share until it wascut to the current 25 cents a sharein February 2019. For five years through Feb. 16, shares of Lumen/CenturyLink were down 34%, with dividends reinvested, while they were down 38% for 10 years.</p><p>Other companies on the list that have cut dividends over the past 10 years include Williams Cos.WMB,Kinder Morgan Inc.KMI,Vornado Realty TrustVNOand Simon Property Group Inc.SPG,which reduced its payout by 38% in June.</p><p>All of this emphasizes the importance of doing your own research to form your own opinion about a company’s long-term prospects if you see any stocks of interest here.</p><p>Aside from CenturyLink, the stock listed above with the lowest forward P/E valuation is AT&amp;T Inc.T,with a dividend yield of 7.18% and P/E of 9.2, followed by Pfizer Inc.PFE,with a yield of 4.50% and forward P/E of 10.3.</p>","source":"market_watch","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>22 additional dividend stocks that Warren Buffett might consider buying</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n22 additional dividend stocks that Warren Buffett might consider buying\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-02-18 14:53 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.marketwatch.com/story/22-additional-dividend-stocks-that-warren-buffett-might-consider-buying-11613579442?mod=home-page><strong>MarketWatch</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>His Berkshire Hathaway conglomerate recently started buying shares of Verizon and Chevron — both have attractive dividend yields well-supported by expected cash flow.A vote of confidence by Warren ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/22-additional-dividend-stocks-that-warren-buffett-might-consider-buying-11613579442?mod=home-page\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"DOW":"陶氏化学","BXP":"BXP Inc","WMB":"威廉姆斯","AMCR":"AMCOR PLC","IPG":"埃培智","IP":"国际纸业","LUMN":"Lumen Technologies","O":"Realty Income Corp","K":"家乐氏","SPG":"西蒙地产","MPC":"马拉松原油","FRT":"FRT信托","OKE":"欧尼克（万欧卡）","IRM":"爱恩铁山","PSX":"Phillips 66","VNO":"沃那多房信","SLG":"SL Green Realty Corp","REG":"Regency Centers Corp","KMI":"金德尔摩根","PFE":"辉瑞","T":"美国电话电报","LYB":"利安德巴塞尔"},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/22-additional-dividend-stocks-that-warren-buffett-might-consider-buying-11613579442?mod=home-page","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/599a65733b8245fcf7868668ef9ad712","article_id":"1124565484","content_text":"His Berkshire Hathaway conglomerate recently started buying shares of Verizon and Chevron — both have attractive dividend yields well-supported by expected cash flow.A vote of confidence by Warren Buffett in a particular stock doesn’t mean you should jump on the bandwagon, but the Berkshire Hathaway CEO’s long-term track record speaks for itself. The man knows how to spot a bargain.Below is a screen of stocks inspired by Buffett’s two new picks that feature attractive dividend yields that are expected to be well-covered by free cash flow.Word of Buffett’s new investment positions can send shares higher as other investors’ ears perk up. This happened after Berkshire Hathaway Inc.BRKdisclosed late Feb. 16 that it had purchased shares of Verizon Communications Inc.VZ.and Chevron Corp.CVX— two stocks with attractive dividend yields, one of which is cheaply priced when compared to the weighted valuation of the S&P 500 IndexSPX.Shares of Verizon were up 3% in early trading Feb. 17, while Chevron was up 3.5%. With dividends reinvested, Verizon had declined 7% for 2021 through Feb. 16, following a flat performance in 2020. Chevron was up 1.5% early Feb. 17 and had already risen 12% for 2021 following a 26% decline in 2020. Oil is on the upswing as investors look ahead to life after the pandemic. West Texas Intermediate crude oilCRUDE OILhad risen 68% from the close on Oct. 31 through Feb. 16, when it settled at $60.05 a barrel.All of the following is based on closing prices Feb. 16 and consensus estimates among analysts polled by FactSet for the next 12 months.Verizon’s stock trades at a forward price-to-earnings ratio of 10.7, compared to a weighted aggregate forward P/E of 22.5 for the S&P 500. The shares have a dividend yield of 4.64%.One way to gauge a company’s ability to cover its dividend (and hopefully raise it) is to look at its free cash flow, which is its remaining cash flow after planned capital expenditures. This is money that can be used for any corporate purpose, including expansion, share repurchases or dividend increases. We can measure a company’s free cash flow yield by dividing trailing or estimated free cash flow by the current share price. Because of the disruptions to the U.S. economy in 2020, all the free cash flow yields that follow make use of consensus estimates for the next 12 reported months.Verizion’s forward free cash flow yield is 8.97%, showing “headroom” of 4.34% over the current dividend.Chevron’s stock trades at a forward P/E ratio of 24.8, which is higher than that of the S&P 500. Then again, 2021 is expected to be a recovery year for oil and natural gas, and analysts’ earnings estimates may not have caught up with rising fuel commodity prices. Chevron’s dividend yield is 5.54% and its forward free cash flow yield is 7.99%, leaving “headroom” of 2.45%.None of this is to say that Buffett is overly fixated on stocks with high dividend yields. He isn’t. Among the publicly traded holdings the company disclosed Feb. 16, there are plenty of companies that pay no dividends, including Amazon.com Inc.AMZN,Biogen Inc.BIIB,Charter Communications Inc.CHTRand General Motors Co.GM,which suspended its quarterly dividend in April.A Buffett dividend stock screenWorking from Buffett’s selections of Verizon and Chevron and excluding stocks Berkshire Hathaway doesn’t already hold, here are the 22 stocks among the S&P 500 with dividend yields of at least 4.00%, for which free cash flow estimates for calendar 2021 are available, with headroom indicated. The list is sorted by dividend yield.Scroll the table to see all the data, including forward P/E ratios and total returns for 2021 and 2020.For real estate investment trusts, the industry standard for measuring dividend-paying ability is funds from operations, a non-GAAP figure that adds depreciation and amortization back to earnings and subtracts gains on the sale of property. So forward FFO estimates are used in the “estimated FCF yield” column on the table.The list excludes four stocks already held by Berkshire Hathaway — Verizon, Chevron and two more:AbbVie Inc.ABBVhas a dividend yield of 4.99%, with a forward free cash flow yield of 10.54% for headroom of 5.55%.Kraft Heinz Co.KHChas a dividend yield of 4.52% and a forward free cash flow yield of 7.59% for headroom of 3.06%. The company cut its dividend by more than a third in February 2019.A high dividend yield might indicate investors are sour on the company’s business prospects or its ability to maintain the dividend over the long term, despite a high FCF yield. For example, the highest-yielding stock on the list is Lumen Technologies Inc.LUMN,which was CenturyLink before it was renamed in September. The dividend yield is 8.48%. CenturyLinkcut its quarterly dividend by 26% on the same day it authorized a $2 billion stock repurchase planin February 2013. The company’s quarterly dividend remained 54 cents a share until it wascut to the current 25 cents a sharein February 2019. For five years through Feb. 16, shares of Lumen/CenturyLink were down 34%, with dividends reinvested, while they were down 38% for 10 years.Other companies on the list that have cut dividends over the past 10 years include Williams Cos.WMB,Kinder Morgan Inc.KMI,Vornado Realty TrustVNOand Simon Property Group Inc.SPG,which reduced its payout by 38% in June.All of this emphasizes the importance of doing your own research to form your own opinion about a company’s long-term prospects if you see any stocks of interest here.Aside from CenturyLink, the stock listed above with the lowest forward P/E valuation is AT&T Inc.T,with a dividend yield of 7.18% and P/E of 9.2, followed by Pfizer Inc.PFE,with a yield of 4.50% and forward P/E of 10.3.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":413,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":384423012,"gmtCreate":1613669183736,"gmtModify":1704883562109,"author":{"id":"3575877197345409","authorId":"3575877197345409","authorIdStr":"3575877197345409","name":"Valzard","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/26b5dd21038b5777aaaba5568d2ce70c","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3575877197345409"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PUGE\">$Puget Technologies Inc(PUGE)$</a>just bought 1 mil shares on the dip. sleeper op stock here. The time is&nbsp;now! You&nbsp;snooze you lose","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PUGE\">$Puget Technologies Inc(PUGE)$</a>just bought 1 mil shares on the dip. sleeper op stock here. The time is&nbsp;now! You&nbsp;snooze you lose","text":"$Puget Technologies Inc(PUGE)$just bought 1 mil shares on the dip. sleeper op stock here. The time is now! You snooze you lose","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/384423012","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":423,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":367097901,"gmtCreate":1614882950703,"gmtModify":1704776578310,"author":{"id":"3575877197345409","authorId":"3575877197345409","authorIdStr":"3575877197345409","name":"Valzard","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/26b5dd21038b5777aaaba5568d2ce70c","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3575877197345409"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NDRA\">$ENDRA Life Sciences Inc(NDRA)$</a>now's your chance to double down on the dip!!&nbsp;","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NDRA\">$ENDRA Life Sciences Inc(NDRA)$</a>now's your chance to double down on the dip!!&nbsp;","text":"$ENDRA Life Sciences Inc(NDRA)$now's your chance to double down on the dip!!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/367097901","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":300,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":368583262,"gmtCreate":1614337940356,"gmtModify":1704770860869,"author":{"id":"3575877197345409","authorId":"3575877197345409","authorIdStr":"3575877197345409","name":"Valzard","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/26b5dd21038b5777aaaba5568d2ce70c","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3575877197345409"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"you snooze you lose&nbsp;","listText":"you snooze you lose&nbsp;","text":"you snooze you lose","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/368583262","repostId":"2114326273","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":356,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":368589637,"gmtCreate":1614337880729,"gmtModify":1704770859575,"author":{"id":"3575877197345409","authorId":"3575877197345409","authorIdStr":"3575877197345409","name":"Valzard","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/26b5dd21038b5777aaaba5568d2ce70c","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3575877197345409"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"??","listText":"??","text":"??","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/368589637","repostId":"2114376536","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2114376536","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1614329346,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2114376536?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-02-26 16:49","market":"hk","language":"en","title":"Hong Kong stocks post worst week in one year as bond yields surge","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2114376536","media":"Reuters","summary":"Feb 26 (Reuters) - Hong Kong stocks ended sharply lower on Friday, in line with broader markets, pos","content":"<p>Feb 26 (Reuters) - Hong Kong stocks ended sharply lower on Friday, in line with broader markets, posting their worst week in one year, as a rout in global bonds sent yields flying and dampened appetite for risky assets.</p>\n<p>The Hang Seng index fell 3.6% to 28,980.21, while the China Enterprises Index lost 4.0% to 11,247.21 points.</p>\n<p>For the week, HSI tumbled 5.4%, while HSCE slumped 7.1%, both logging their steepest drops since the week to March 13, 2020.</p>\n<p>Yields on the 10-year Treasury note eased back to 1.494% from a one-year high of 1.614%, but were still up 40 basis points for the month in their biggest move since 2016.</p>\n<p>Adding to the pressure were worries over Sino-U.S. trade relations.</p>\n<p>Katherine Tai, President Joe Biden's top trade nominee, backed tariffs as a \"legitimate tool\" to counter China's state-driven economic model and vowed to hold Beijing to its prior commitments.</p>\n<p>This week's retreat also came after a stamp duty hike that hit sentiment hard and deterred southbound funds.</p>\n<p>The stamp duty will rise to 0.13% of the value of the transaction from the current 0.1% on Aug. 1, Hong Kong Financial Secretary Paul Chan announced in his annual budget speech.</p>\n<p>\"It's an asset class type rotation now that you really looking at, because there's nothing that's impervious to the sell-off,\" said Andy Maynard, head of equities at China Renaissance in Hong Kong.</p>\n<p>\"Southbound (money) is cautious now. The day before yesterday was record selling for them and where they haven't had a sale day since 2021 started. So, you got to feel that we are probably in the crosshairs of complete or a healthy correction\", he added.</p>\n<p>Mainland investors sold a net HK$3.1 billion ($399.68 million) of Hong Kong shares via the Stock Connect on Friday, according to Refinitiv data, following a daily record outflow of HK$20 billion on Wednesday.</p>\n<p>($1 = 7.7563 Hong Kong dollars)</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Hong Kong stocks post worst week in one year as bond yields surge</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHong Kong stocks post worst week in one year as bond yields surge\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-02-26 16:49</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Feb 26 (Reuters) - Hong Kong stocks ended sharply lower on Friday, in line with broader markets, posting their worst week in one year, as a rout in global bonds sent yields flying and dampened appetite for risky assets.</p>\n<p>The Hang Seng index fell 3.6% to 28,980.21, while the China Enterprises Index lost 4.0% to 11,247.21 points.</p>\n<p>For the week, HSI tumbled 5.4%, while HSCE slumped 7.1%, both logging their steepest drops since the week to March 13, 2020.</p>\n<p>Yields on the 10-year Treasury note eased back to 1.494% from a one-year high of 1.614%, but were still up 40 basis points for the month in their biggest move since 2016.</p>\n<p>Adding to the pressure were worries over Sino-U.S. trade relations.</p>\n<p>Katherine Tai, President Joe Biden's top trade nominee, backed tariffs as a \"legitimate tool\" to counter China's state-driven economic model and vowed to hold Beijing to its prior commitments.</p>\n<p>This week's retreat also came after a stamp duty hike that hit sentiment hard and deterred southbound funds.</p>\n<p>The stamp duty will rise to 0.13% of the value of the transaction from the current 0.1% on Aug. 1, Hong Kong Financial Secretary Paul Chan announced in his annual budget speech.</p>\n<p>\"It's an asset class type rotation now that you really looking at, because there's nothing that's impervious to the sell-off,\" said Andy Maynard, head of equities at China Renaissance in Hong Kong.</p>\n<p>\"Southbound (money) is cautious now. The day before yesterday was record selling for them and where they haven't had a sale day since 2021 started. So, you got to feel that we are probably in the crosshairs of complete or a healthy correction\", he added.</p>\n<p>Mainland investors sold a net HK$3.1 billion ($399.68 million) of Hong Kong shares via the Stock Connect on Friday, according to Refinitiv data, following a daily record outflow of HK$20 billion on Wednesday.</p>\n<p>($1 = 7.7563 Hong Kong dollars)</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"HSCCI":"红筹指数","HSI":"恒生指数","HSCEI":"国企指数"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2114376536","content_text":"Feb 26 (Reuters) - Hong Kong stocks ended sharply lower on Friday, in line with broader markets, posting their worst week in one year, as a rout in global bonds sent yields flying and dampened appetite for risky assets.\nThe Hang Seng index fell 3.6% to 28,980.21, while the China Enterprises Index lost 4.0% to 11,247.21 points.\nFor the week, HSI tumbled 5.4%, while HSCE slumped 7.1%, both logging their steepest drops since the week to March 13, 2020.\nYields on the 10-year Treasury note eased back to 1.494% from a one-year high of 1.614%, but were still up 40 basis points for the month in their biggest move since 2016.\nAdding to the pressure were worries over Sino-U.S. trade relations.\nKatherine Tai, President Joe Biden's top trade nominee, backed tariffs as a \"legitimate tool\" to counter China's state-driven economic model and vowed to hold Beijing to its prior commitments.\nThis week's retreat also came after a stamp duty hike that hit sentiment hard and deterred southbound funds.\nThe stamp duty will rise to 0.13% of the value of the transaction from the current 0.1% on Aug. 1, Hong Kong Financial Secretary Paul Chan announced in his annual budget speech.\n\"It's an asset class type rotation now that you really looking at, because there's nothing that's impervious to the sell-off,\" said Andy Maynard, head of equities at China Renaissance in Hong Kong.\n\"Southbound (money) is cautious now. The day before yesterday was record selling for them and where they haven't had a sale day since 2021 started. So, you got to feel that we are probably in the crosshairs of complete or a healthy correction\", he added.\nMainland investors sold a net HK$3.1 billion ($399.68 million) of Hong Kong shares via the Stock Connect on Friday, according to Refinitiv data, following a daily record outflow of HK$20 billion on Wednesday.\n($1 = 7.7563 Hong Kong dollars)","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":595,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":368589973,"gmtCreate":1614337847792,"gmtModify":1704770859086,"author":{"id":"3575877197345409","authorId":"3575877197345409","authorIdStr":"3575877197345409","name":"Valzard","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/26b5dd21038b5777aaaba5568d2ce70c","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3575877197345409"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"??","listText":"??","text":"??","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/368589973","repostId":"2114343228","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":224,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":387140812,"gmtCreate":1613730772836,"gmtModify":1704884256125,"author":{"id":"3575877197345409","authorId":"3575877197345409","authorIdStr":"3575877197345409","name":"Valzard","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/26b5dd21038b5777aaaba5568d2ce70c","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3575877197345409"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"what a wonderful pick!&nbsp;","listText":"what a wonderful pick!&nbsp;","text":"what a wonderful pick!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/387140812","repostId":"384436890","repostType":1,"repost":{"id":384436890,"gmtCreate":1613665033410,"gmtModify":1704883515718,"author":{"id":"3570777781144612","authorId":"3570777781144612","authorIdStr":"3570777781144612","name":"redcandless","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3570777781144612"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ADTM\">$Adaptive Medias, Inc.(ADTM)$</a>green among the sea of red! Wonder if it can pull through and be a superstar!","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ADTM\">$Adaptive Medias, Inc.(ADTM)$</a>green among the sea of red! Wonder if it can pull through and be a superstar!","text":"$Adaptive Medias, Inc.(ADTM)$green among the sea of red! Wonder if it can pull through and be a superstar!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/384436890","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":0,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":345,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":369587409,"gmtCreate":1614059782601,"gmtModify":1704887455586,"author":{"id":"3575877197345409","authorId":"3575877197345409","authorIdStr":"3575877197345409","name":"Valzard","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/26b5dd21038b5777aaaba5568d2ce70c","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3575877197345409"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"so sad!","listText":"so sad!","text":"so sad!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/369587409","repostId":"1129494437","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1129494437","pubTimestamp":1614048165,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1129494437?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-02-23 10:42","market":"us","language":"en","title":"After the GameStop fiasco, momentum builds for an $800 billion tax","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1129494437","media":"CNN Business","summary":"New York (CNN Business)-Uncle Sam is in search for a pot of gold that could ease the pain of trillio","content":"<p><b>New York (CNN Business)-</b>Uncle Sam is in search for a pot of gold that could ease the pain of trillion-dollar deficits. And some believe Wall Street might just have the answer.</p>\n<p>For more than a decade, progressives have&nbsp;tried and failed to impose a financial transaction tax.But there is new momentum for such a levy as the&nbsp;national debt skyrockets&nbsp;during the pandemic and in the wake of the&nbsp;GameStop trading frenzy&nbsp;that&nbsp;shined a bright light market structure concerns.</p>\n<p>The White House told CNN Business on Sunday&nbsp;that a financial transaction tax on GameStop-like trading deserves additional study and can be part of a greater evaluation of such a tax for revenue and market stability. The leading proposal amounts to a $1 tax on every $1,000 of transactions.</p>\n<p>But there is a deep divide over the wisdom of a financial transaction tax. Progressives see it as a smart way to simultaneously curb predatory trading while funding ambitious programs aimed at easing America's inequality problem.Opponents, on the other hand, paint a financial transaction tax (FTT) as a nightmare. Wall Street, which would take a hit, is already warning such a levy&nbsp;would backfire on Main Street&nbsp;by raising trading costs and depressing market liquidity.</p>\n<p>\"The odds are still against a financial transaction tax being enacted, but for the first time in a decade this proposal should be considered as a viable policy option rather than just another talking point,\" said Isaac Boltansky, director of policy research at Compass Point Research &amp; Trading.</p>\n<p>Last week, House Financial Services Chairwoman Maxine Waters said she's \"very interested\" and \"certainly looking at\" a financial transaction tax.</p>\n<p><b>'Mindboggling' concentration of wealth</b></p>\n<p>Lawmakers will surely be tempted to tax transactions because it could raise vast sums of money at a time when Washington is strapped for cash.</p>\n<p>A 0.1% tax on stock, bond and derivative transactions&nbsp;could raise $777 billion for the federal government over a decade, according to a 2018 estimate by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office.</p>\n<p>\"We have tremendous income inequality in our society and a giant deficit. A financial transaction tax would be an incredibly efficient and progressive way to raise revenue,\" Aaron Klein, a former Treasury Department official in the Obama administration, told CNN Business.</p>\n<p>The top 1% of American households would pay 40% of the total amount of the tax, while the bottom 60% would pay just over 11%, according to the&nbsp;Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center.</p>\n<p>That makes sense because the wealthiest 10% of US households owned 87% of all stocks and mutual funds, according to&nbsp;2020 data from the Federal Reserve.</p>\n<p>\"The concentration of wealth in the stock market is mindboggling,\" said Klein, who is now a senior fellow of economic studies at the Brookings Institution.</p>\n<p>Even though some argue an FTT would be a disaster, the United States already has a tax, albeit a very tiny one. Roughly 2 cents per $1,000 traded goes toward&nbsp;funding the budget of the Securities and Exchange Commission.Due to surging trading volume during the pandemic, the&nbsp;tax rate to fund the SEC is being lowered&nbsp;to just half a cent per $1,000 starting Thursday.</p>\n<p>\"There is a fee today and the world hasn't ended,\" said Dennis Kelleher, CEO of Better Markets, a group that lobbies for tougher oversight of Wall Street. \"The proposed fee is so puny that no reasonable retail investor would ever notice it.\"</p>\n<p><b>'Unintended consequences'</b></p>\n<p>The financial industry is arguing the exact opposite.</p>\n<p>They say even a 0.1% levy on transactions will cause market players to pass the costs on to consumers and make it harder to buy and sell securities by decreasing liquidity, which measures how easy it is to buy and sell securities. Some Wall Street firms could even try to move their operations outside the country to avoid the tax. The&nbsp;New York Stock Exchange recently threatened to flee&nbsp;New York,possibly for Texas, in response to transaction taxes mulled by Albany.</p>\n<p>\"This approach has a long history of unintended consequences that will penalize workers, pensioners and American families,\" a spokesperson for the Coalition to Prevent the Taxing of Retirement Savings told CNN Business.</p>\n<p>That coalition includes the NYSE,Nasdaq&nbsp;(NDAQ)&nbsp;and&nbsp;UBS&nbsp;(UBS). Citadel Securities andVirtu Financial(VIRT), two high-speed trading firms that would be hurt by a financial transaction tax, are also members.</p>\n<p>\"An FTT will increase trading costs for investors — including individuals — undermine the competitiveness of our capital markets and harm the US economy just as we work to recover from this pandemic,\" the spokesperson said.</p>\n<p><b>Some countries tried and failed</b></p>\n<p>James Angel, a Georgetown University professor who specializes in market structure and regulation,authored a Chamber of Commerce-funded paper in 2019&nbsp;that found a financial transaction tax would hurt Main Street by driving up the cost of trading by more than the amount of the tax.</p>\n<p>\"There is no such thing as a tiny tax that raises big revenue,\" Angel said in an interview.</p>\n<p>He pointed to how some other countries, most notably Sweden in the 1980s, abandoned such taxes after trading volume vanished and revenue underwhelmed. (Of course, the United States, with its deep financial markets, massive economy and the world's reserve currency, is not Sweden.)</p>\n<p>\"It really messes up the market,\" Angel said.</p>\n<p>If US trading volumes fell sharply, the FTT wouldn't raise nearly as much as the $777 billion the CBO estimates.</p>\n<p>Greg Valliere, chief US policy strategist at AGF Investments, said the chances of a financial transaction tax are \"very slim\" because moderate Democrats would be unlikely to back it.</p>\n<p>\"It would be a disaster. It's a pandora's box that should not be opened,\" Valliere said.</p>\n<p>Of course, it's possible that FTT proposals in Congress get scaled back, including by lowering the rate or excluding smaller blocks of trades.</p>\n<p><b>Leveling the playing field</b></p>\n<p>During last week's congressional hearing on GameStop and Robinhood, Citadel Securities founder&nbsp;Ken Griffin warned a tax would boomerang.</p>\n<p>\"We firmly believe a financial transaction tax would injure Americans trying to save for retirement,\" Griffin said.</p>\n<p>Klein, the Brookings Institution fellow, called Griffin's comments a \"self-serving lie\" because high-frequency trading firms like his would be among those hurt.</p>\n<p>The GameStop trading frenzy drew attention onto how Robinhood was able to bring zero-commission trading to the masses.</p>\n<p>Through a&nbsp;controversial practice known as payment for order flow, Robinhood and other brokers get paid to route retail trades through market makers like Citadel Securities.</p>\n<p>Payment for order flow has made it cheap and easy to trade. However, critics say it's really Wall Street that is getting the better end of the deal by skimming pennies off each trade and racing ahead of retail orders to make a profit.</p>\n<p>\"We believe the markets today are rigged to favor high-frequency traders,\" said Kelleher, the Better Markets CEO. \"The industry has taken visible upfront commission fees and disguised it into invisible payment for order flow.\"</p>\n<p>In other words, it's not really free to trade.</p>\n<p>Kelleher thinks Congress should focus on taxing orders, not transactions, because a&nbsp;staggering amount of all stock trade orders(some estimates&nbsp;say 99%) are canceled because of high-frequency trading strategies. Critics say those orders are evidence that high-speed traders are manipulating the market by creating the appearance of demand where there is none.</p>\n<p>\"A financial fee on orders could be the death knell for predatory high frequency trading,\" he said. \"Everyone will be better off — except for the predators.\"</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>After the GameStop fiasco, momentum builds for an $800 billion tax</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAfter the GameStop fiasco, momentum builds for an $800 billion tax\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-02-23 10:42 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://edition.cnn.com/2021/02/22/investing/gamestop-financial-transaction-tax/index.html><strong>CNN Business</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>New York (CNN Business)-Uncle Sam is in search for a pot of gold that could ease the pain of trillion-dollar deficits. And some believe Wall Street might just have the answer.\nFor more than a decade, ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://edition.cnn.com/2021/02/22/investing/gamestop-financial-transaction-tax/index.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"GME":"游戏驿站",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://edition.cnn.com/2021/02/22/investing/gamestop-financial-transaction-tax/index.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1129494437","content_text":"New York (CNN Business)-Uncle Sam is in search for a pot of gold that could ease the pain of trillion-dollar deficits. And some believe Wall Street might just have the answer.\nFor more than a decade, progressives have tried and failed to impose a financial transaction tax.But there is new momentum for such a levy as the national debt skyrockets during the pandemic and in the wake of the GameStop trading frenzy that shined a bright light market structure concerns.\nThe White House told CNN Business on Sunday that a financial transaction tax on GameStop-like trading deserves additional study and can be part of a greater evaluation of such a tax for revenue and market stability. The leading proposal amounts to a $1 tax on every $1,000 of transactions.\nBut there is a deep divide over the wisdom of a financial transaction tax. Progressives see it as a smart way to simultaneously curb predatory trading while funding ambitious programs aimed at easing America's inequality problem.Opponents, on the other hand, paint a financial transaction tax (FTT) as a nightmare. Wall Street, which would take a hit, is already warning such a levy would backfire on Main Street by raising trading costs and depressing market liquidity.\n\"The odds are still against a financial transaction tax being enacted, but for the first time in a decade this proposal should be considered as a viable policy option rather than just another talking point,\" said Isaac Boltansky, director of policy research at Compass Point Research & Trading.\nLast week, House Financial Services Chairwoman Maxine Waters said she's \"very interested\" and \"certainly looking at\" a financial transaction tax.\n'Mindboggling' concentration of wealth\nLawmakers will surely be tempted to tax transactions because it could raise vast sums of money at a time when Washington is strapped for cash.\nA 0.1% tax on stock, bond and derivative transactions could raise $777 billion for the federal government over a decade, according to a 2018 estimate by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office.\n\"We have tremendous income inequality in our society and a giant deficit. A financial transaction tax would be an incredibly efficient and progressive way to raise revenue,\" Aaron Klein, a former Treasury Department official in the Obama administration, told CNN Business.\nThe top 1% of American households would pay 40% of the total amount of the tax, while the bottom 60% would pay just over 11%, according to the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center.\nThat makes sense because the wealthiest 10% of US households owned 87% of all stocks and mutual funds, according to 2020 data from the Federal Reserve.\n\"The concentration of wealth in the stock market is mindboggling,\" said Klein, who is now a senior fellow of economic studies at the Brookings Institution.\nEven though some argue an FTT would be a disaster, the United States already has a tax, albeit a very tiny one. Roughly 2 cents per $1,000 traded goes toward funding the budget of the Securities and Exchange Commission.Due to surging trading volume during the pandemic, the tax rate to fund the SEC is being lowered to just half a cent per $1,000 starting Thursday.\n\"There is a fee today and the world hasn't ended,\" said Dennis Kelleher, CEO of Better Markets, a group that lobbies for tougher oversight of Wall Street. \"The proposed fee is so puny that no reasonable retail investor would ever notice it.\"\n'Unintended consequences'\nThe financial industry is arguing the exact opposite.\nThey say even a 0.1% levy on transactions will cause market players to pass the costs on to consumers and make it harder to buy and sell securities by decreasing liquidity, which measures how easy it is to buy and sell securities. Some Wall Street firms could even try to move their operations outside the country to avoid the tax. The New York Stock Exchange recently threatened to flee New York,possibly for Texas, in response to transaction taxes mulled by Albany.\n\"This approach has a long history of unintended consequences that will penalize workers, pensioners and American families,\" a spokesperson for the Coalition to Prevent the Taxing of Retirement Savings told CNN Business.\nThat coalition includes the NYSE,Nasdaq (NDAQ) and UBS (UBS). Citadel Securities andVirtu Financial(VIRT), two high-speed trading firms that would be hurt by a financial transaction tax, are also members.\n\"An FTT will increase trading costs for investors — including individuals — undermine the competitiveness of our capital markets and harm the US economy just as we work to recover from this pandemic,\" the spokesperson said.\nSome countries tried and failed\nJames Angel, a Georgetown University professor who specializes in market structure and regulation,authored a Chamber of Commerce-funded paper in 2019 that found a financial transaction tax would hurt Main Street by driving up the cost of trading by more than the amount of the tax.\n\"There is no such thing as a tiny tax that raises big revenue,\" Angel said in an interview.\nHe pointed to how some other countries, most notably Sweden in the 1980s, abandoned such taxes after trading volume vanished and revenue underwhelmed. (Of course, the United States, with its deep financial markets, massive economy and the world's reserve currency, is not Sweden.)\n\"It really messes up the market,\" Angel said.\nIf US trading volumes fell sharply, the FTT wouldn't raise nearly as much as the $777 billion the CBO estimates.\nGreg Valliere, chief US policy strategist at AGF Investments, said the chances of a financial transaction tax are \"very slim\" because moderate Democrats would be unlikely to back it.\n\"It would be a disaster. It's a pandora's box that should not be opened,\" Valliere said.\nOf course, it's possible that FTT proposals in Congress get scaled back, including by lowering the rate or excluding smaller blocks of trades.\nLeveling the playing field\nDuring last week's congressional hearing on GameStop and Robinhood, Citadel Securities founder Ken Griffin warned a tax would boomerang.\n\"We firmly believe a financial transaction tax would injure Americans trying to save for retirement,\" Griffin said.\nKlein, the Brookings Institution fellow, called Griffin's comments a \"self-serving lie\" because high-frequency trading firms like his would be among those hurt.\nThe GameStop trading frenzy drew attention onto how Robinhood was able to bring zero-commission trading to the masses.\nThrough a controversial practice known as payment for order flow, Robinhood and other brokers get paid to route retail trades through market makers like Citadel Securities.\nPayment for order flow has made it cheap and easy to trade. However, critics say it's really Wall Street that is getting the better end of the deal by skimming pennies off each trade and racing ahead of retail orders to make a profit.\n\"We believe the markets today are rigged to favor high-frequency traders,\" said Kelleher, the Better Markets CEO. \"The industry has taken visible upfront commission fees and disguised it into invisible payment for order flow.\"\nIn other words, it's not really free to trade.\nKelleher thinks Congress should focus on taxing orders, not transactions, because a staggering amount of all stock trade orders(some estimates say 99%) are canceled because of high-frequency trading strategies. Critics say those orders are evidence that high-speed traders are manipulating the market by creating the appearance of demand where there is none.\n\"A financial fee on orders could be the death knell for predatory high frequency trading,\" he said. \"Everyone will be better off — except for the predators.\"","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":198,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":384420348,"gmtCreate":1613668926584,"gmtModify":1704883560494,"author":{"id":"3575877197345409","authorId":"3575877197345409","authorIdStr":"3575877197345409","name":"Valzard","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/26b5dd21038b5777aaaba5568d2ce70c","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3575877197345409"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"nice!&nbsp;","listText":"nice!&nbsp;","text":"nice!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/384420348","repostId":"1124565484","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1124565484","pubTimestamp":1613631190,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1124565484?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-02-18 14:53","market":"us","language":"en","title":"22 additional dividend stocks that Warren Buffett might consider buying","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1124565484","media":"MarketWatch","summary":"His Berkshire Hathaway conglomerate recently started buying shares of Verizon and Chevron — both hav","content":"<blockquote><b>His Berkshire Hathaway conglomerate recently started buying shares of Verizon and Chevron — both have attractive dividend yields well-supported by expected cash flow.</b></blockquote><p>A vote of confidence by Warren Buffett in a particular stock doesn’t mean you should jump on the bandwagon, but the Berkshire Hathaway CEO’s long-term track record speaks for itself. The man knows how to spot a bargain.</p><p>Below is a screen of stocks inspired by Buffett’s two new picks that feature attractive dividend yields that are expected to be well-covered by free cash flow.</p><p>Word of Buffett’s new investment positions can send shares higher as other investors’ ears perk up. This happened after Berkshire Hathaway Inc.BRKdisclosed late Feb. 16 that it had purchased shares of Verizon Communications Inc.VZ.and Chevron Corp.CVX— two stocks with attractive dividend yields, one of which is cheaply priced when compared to the weighted valuation of the S&amp;P 500 IndexSPX.</p><p>Shares of Verizon were up 3% in early trading Feb. 17, while Chevron was up 3.5%. With dividends reinvested, Verizon had declined 7% for 2021 through Feb. 16, following a flat performance in 2020. Chevron was up 1.5% early Feb. 17 and had already risen 12% for 2021 following a 26% decline in 2020. Oil is on the upswing as investors look ahead to life after the pandemic. West Texas Intermediate crude oilCRUDE OILhad risen 68% from the close on Oct. 31 through Feb. 16, when it settled at $60.05 a barrel.</p><p>All of the following is based on closing prices Feb. 16 and consensus estimates among analysts polled by FactSet for the next 12 months.</p><p>Verizon’s stock trades at a forward price-to-earnings ratio of 10.7, compared to a weighted aggregate forward P/E of 22.5 for the S&amp;P 500. The shares have a dividend yield of 4.64%.</p><p>One way to gauge a company’s ability to cover its dividend (and hopefully raise it) is to look at its free cash flow, which is its remaining cash flow after planned capital expenditures. This is money that can be used for any corporate purpose, including expansion, share repurchases or dividend increases. We can measure a company’s free cash flow yield by dividing trailing or estimated free cash flow by the current share price. Because of the disruptions to the U.S. economy in 2020, all the free cash flow yields that follow make use of consensus estimates for the next 12 reported months.</p><p>Verizion’s forward free cash flow yield is 8.97%, showing “headroom” of 4.34% over the current dividend.</p><p>Chevron’s stock trades at a forward P/E ratio of 24.8, which is higher than that of the S&amp;P 500. Then again, 2021 is expected to be a recovery year for oil and natural gas, and analysts’ earnings estimates may not have caught up with rising fuel commodity prices. Chevron’s dividend yield is 5.54% and its forward free cash flow yield is 7.99%, leaving “headroom” of 2.45%.</p><p>None of this is to say that Buffett is overly fixated on stocks with high dividend yields. He isn’t. Among the publicly traded holdings the company disclosed Feb. 16, there are plenty of companies that pay no dividends, including Amazon.com Inc.AMZN,Biogen Inc.BIIB,Charter Communications Inc.CHTRand General Motors Co.GM,which suspended its quarterly dividend in April.</p><p><b>A Buffett dividend stock screen</b></p><p>Working from Buffett’s selections of Verizon and Chevron and excluding stocks Berkshire Hathaway doesn’t already hold, here are the 22 stocks among the S&amp;P 500 with dividend yields of at least 4.00%, for which free cash flow estimates for calendar 2021 are available, with headroom indicated. The list is sorted by dividend yield.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fc941b397e252f4198fa8bb425fa2bbb\" tg-width=\"666\" tg-height=\"762\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">Scroll the table to see all the data, including forward P/E ratios and total returns for 2021 and 2020.</p><p>For real estate investment trusts, the industry standard for measuring dividend-paying ability is funds from operations, a non-GAAP figure that adds depreciation and amortization back to earnings and subtracts gains on the sale of property. So forward FFO estimates are used in the “estimated FCF yield” column on the table.</p><p>The list excludes four stocks already held by Berkshire Hathaway — Verizon, Chevron and two more:</p><ul><li>AbbVie Inc.ABBVhas a dividend yield of 4.99%, with a forward free cash flow yield of 10.54% for headroom of 5.55%.</li><li>Kraft Heinz Co.KHChas a dividend yield of 4.52% and a forward free cash flow yield of 7.59% for headroom of 3.06%. The company cut its dividend by more than a third in February 2019.</li></ul><p>A high dividend yield might indicate investors are sour on the company’s business prospects or its ability to maintain the dividend over the long term, despite a high FCF yield. For example, the highest-yielding stock on the list is Lumen Technologies Inc.LUMN,which was CenturyLink before it was renamed in September. The dividend yield is 8.48%. CenturyLinkcut its quarterly dividend by 26% on the same day it authorized a $2 billion stock repurchase planin February 2013. The company’s quarterly dividend remained 54 cents a share until it wascut to the current 25 cents a sharein February 2019. For five years through Feb. 16, shares of Lumen/CenturyLink were down 34%, with dividends reinvested, while they were down 38% for 10 years.</p><p>Other companies on the list that have cut dividends over the past 10 years include Williams Cos.WMB,Kinder Morgan Inc.KMI,Vornado Realty TrustVNOand Simon Property Group Inc.SPG,which reduced its payout by 38% in June.</p><p>All of this emphasizes the importance of doing your own research to form your own opinion about a company’s long-term prospects if you see any stocks of interest here.</p><p>Aside from CenturyLink, the stock listed above with the lowest forward P/E valuation is AT&amp;T Inc.T,with a dividend yield of 7.18% and P/E of 9.2, followed by Pfizer Inc.PFE,with a yield of 4.50% and forward P/E of 10.3.</p>","source":"market_watch","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>22 additional dividend stocks that Warren Buffett might consider buying</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n22 additional dividend stocks that Warren Buffett might consider buying\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-02-18 14:53 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.marketwatch.com/story/22-additional-dividend-stocks-that-warren-buffett-might-consider-buying-11613579442?mod=home-page><strong>MarketWatch</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>His Berkshire Hathaway conglomerate recently started buying shares of Verizon and Chevron — both have attractive dividend yields well-supported by expected cash flow.A vote of confidence by Warren ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/22-additional-dividend-stocks-that-warren-buffett-might-consider-buying-11613579442?mod=home-page\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"DOW":"陶氏化学","BXP":"BXP Inc","WMB":"威廉姆斯","AMCR":"AMCOR PLC","IPG":"埃培智","IP":"国际纸业","LUMN":"Lumen Technologies","O":"Realty Income Corp","K":"家乐氏","SPG":"西蒙地产","MPC":"马拉松原油","FRT":"FRT信托","OKE":"欧尼克（万欧卡）","IRM":"爱恩铁山","PSX":"Phillips 66","VNO":"沃那多房信","SLG":"SL Green Realty Corp","REG":"Regency Centers Corp","KMI":"金德尔摩根","PFE":"辉瑞","T":"美国电话电报","LYB":"利安德巴塞尔"},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/22-additional-dividend-stocks-that-warren-buffett-might-consider-buying-11613579442?mod=home-page","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/599a65733b8245fcf7868668ef9ad712","article_id":"1124565484","content_text":"His Berkshire Hathaway conglomerate recently started buying shares of Verizon and Chevron — both have attractive dividend yields well-supported by expected cash flow.A vote of confidence by Warren Buffett in a particular stock doesn’t mean you should jump on the bandwagon, but the Berkshire Hathaway CEO’s long-term track record speaks for itself. The man knows how to spot a bargain.Below is a screen of stocks inspired by Buffett’s two new picks that feature attractive dividend yields that are expected to be well-covered by free cash flow.Word of Buffett’s new investment positions can send shares higher as other investors’ ears perk up. This happened after Berkshire Hathaway Inc.BRKdisclosed late Feb. 16 that it had purchased shares of Verizon Communications Inc.VZ.and Chevron Corp.CVX— two stocks with attractive dividend yields, one of which is cheaply priced when compared to the weighted valuation of the S&P 500 IndexSPX.Shares of Verizon were up 3% in early trading Feb. 17, while Chevron was up 3.5%. With dividends reinvested, Verizon had declined 7% for 2021 through Feb. 16, following a flat performance in 2020. Chevron was up 1.5% early Feb. 17 and had already risen 12% for 2021 following a 26% decline in 2020. Oil is on the upswing as investors look ahead to life after the pandemic. West Texas Intermediate crude oilCRUDE OILhad risen 68% from the close on Oct. 31 through Feb. 16, when it settled at $60.05 a barrel.All of the following is based on closing prices Feb. 16 and consensus estimates among analysts polled by FactSet for the next 12 months.Verizon’s stock trades at a forward price-to-earnings ratio of 10.7, compared to a weighted aggregate forward P/E of 22.5 for the S&P 500. The shares have a dividend yield of 4.64%.One way to gauge a company’s ability to cover its dividend (and hopefully raise it) is to look at its free cash flow, which is its remaining cash flow after planned capital expenditures. This is money that can be used for any corporate purpose, including expansion, share repurchases or dividend increases. We can measure a company’s free cash flow yield by dividing trailing or estimated free cash flow by the current share price. Because of the disruptions to the U.S. economy in 2020, all the free cash flow yields that follow make use of consensus estimates for the next 12 reported months.Verizion’s forward free cash flow yield is 8.97%, showing “headroom” of 4.34% over the current dividend.Chevron’s stock trades at a forward P/E ratio of 24.8, which is higher than that of the S&P 500. Then again, 2021 is expected to be a recovery year for oil and natural gas, and analysts’ earnings estimates may not have caught up with rising fuel commodity prices. Chevron’s dividend yield is 5.54% and its forward free cash flow yield is 7.99%, leaving “headroom” of 2.45%.None of this is to say that Buffett is overly fixated on stocks with high dividend yields. He isn’t. Among the publicly traded holdings the company disclosed Feb. 16, there are plenty of companies that pay no dividends, including Amazon.com Inc.AMZN,Biogen Inc.BIIB,Charter Communications Inc.CHTRand General Motors Co.GM,which suspended its quarterly dividend in April.A Buffett dividend stock screenWorking from Buffett’s selections of Verizon and Chevron and excluding stocks Berkshire Hathaway doesn’t already hold, here are the 22 stocks among the S&P 500 with dividend yields of at least 4.00%, for which free cash flow estimates for calendar 2021 are available, with headroom indicated. The list is sorted by dividend yield.Scroll the table to see all the data, including forward P/E ratios and total returns for 2021 and 2020.For real estate investment trusts, the industry standard for measuring dividend-paying ability is funds from operations, a non-GAAP figure that adds depreciation and amortization back to earnings and subtracts gains on the sale of property. So forward FFO estimates are used in the “estimated FCF yield” column on the table.The list excludes four stocks already held by Berkshire Hathaway — Verizon, Chevron and two more:AbbVie Inc.ABBVhas a dividend yield of 4.99%, with a forward free cash flow yield of 10.54% for headroom of 5.55%.Kraft Heinz Co.KHChas a dividend yield of 4.52% and a forward free cash flow yield of 7.59% for headroom of 3.06%. The company cut its dividend by more than a third in February 2019.A high dividend yield might indicate investors are sour on the company’s business prospects or its ability to maintain the dividend over the long term, despite a high FCF yield. For example, the highest-yielding stock on the list is Lumen Technologies Inc.LUMN,which was CenturyLink before it was renamed in September. The dividend yield is 8.48%. CenturyLinkcut its quarterly dividend by 26% on the same day it authorized a $2 billion stock repurchase planin February 2013. The company’s quarterly dividend remained 54 cents a share until it wascut to the current 25 cents a sharein February 2019. For five years through Feb. 16, shares of Lumen/CenturyLink were down 34%, with dividends reinvested, while they were down 38% for 10 years.Other companies on the list that have cut dividends over the past 10 years include Williams Cos.WMB,Kinder Morgan Inc.KMI,Vornado Realty TrustVNOand Simon Property Group Inc.SPG,which reduced its payout by 38% in June.All of this emphasizes the importance of doing your own research to form your own opinion about a company’s long-term prospects if you see any stocks of interest here.Aside from CenturyLink, the stock listed above with the lowest forward P/E valuation is AT&T Inc.T,with a dividend yield of 7.18% and P/E of 9.2, followed by Pfizer Inc.PFE,with a yield of 4.50% and forward P/E of 10.3.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":413,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}