moJoe personal page - To The Moon

moJoe

moJoe

No personal profile

36Follow

3Followers

0Topic

0Badge

2021-04-22

This will be next in line after gamestop ?. This is one of the most heavily shorted stock by hedge fxcks. A lot of volumes gone to this stock but still stuck at below 10. Hedge funds trying to manipulate market. Also try looking @ sundial always no1 on volumes and its on negatives most days. Try figuring that out. Even goods news it stays on red..

AMC Stock: 3 Reasons to Stay Away Despite Recent 9% Uptick

2021-04-15

Time to buy now.

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2021-04-13

How will it fade away....hahaha. mevin capital lossing 49% in the quarter says it all. They are getting squeezed out by retailer by holding stocks. Its a matter of time, the other 51% will be gone. Buy the dip. Hold the bananas.

GameStop plunged more than 10%, GameStop Skeptic Warns That Reddit Rally Will Fade

2021-03-25

No doubt. Tesla is the frontier of the technology.

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2021-03-25

On my opinion and probably evertones, you havent lost anything until you sell your shares. So keep hodling the line dont budge. Diamond hands, hedge funds are felling the pinch..

Tech and GameStop losses have traders wondering if retail investors are losing interest in market

2021-03-25

And there you go folks the scare tactics of the media backed by the hedge funds..

Tech and GameStop losses have traders wondering if retail investors are losing interest in market

2021-03-24

Its only a scare tactic. Hedge funds must be hurting bad..

4 Dangerous Robinhood Stocks That Could Lose 50% or More, According to Wall Street

2021-03-24

Interesting. Its cathie the gooddess.

2 Under-the-Radar Nasdaq Stocks Cathie Wood Loves Right Now

2021-03-23

Im watching..

These Stocks Are More of a Gamble Than an Investment — and the #1 Is a Reddit Favorite

2021-03-23

Im listening..

Before You Buy Sundial Growers, Stop and Consider These 3 Things

2021-03-23

$Express,(EXPR)$easy does it.

2021-03-19

Get out now..keep on the look out.

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2021-03-18

Nice gains..

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2021-03-18

You beauty...

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2021-03-18

Genius.

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2021-03-18

Keep it up..

Olo opens for trading at $31.82 up 27% from IPO price

2021-03-17

Steady as she go..

2021-03-17

Hmmmm.

Larry McDonald Warns "The Big [Market] Quake Is Coming"

2021-03-17

Nxt big thing..

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2021-03-17

Oh well.

@小虎活动:【曬單有獎】劇震中依然賺錢的股票

Go to Tiger App to see more news

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"userPageInfo":{"id":"3576336077780129","uuid":"3576336077780129","gmtCreate":1613242054835,"gmtModify":1615889520385,"name":"moJoe","pinyin":"mojoe","introduction":"","introductionEn":null,"signature":"","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/51b5f1e98cb521c4bd52447b0ea6e905","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":3,"headSize":36,"tweetSize":27,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":2,"name":"无畏虎","nameTw":"無畏虎","represent":"初生牛犊","factor":"发布3条非转发主帖,1条获得他人回复或点赞","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":"success","userBadges":[{"badgeId":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493-2","templateUuid":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493","name":"Senior Tiger","description":"Join the tiger community for 1000 days","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0063fb68ea29c9ae6858c58630e182d5","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/96c699a93be4214d4b49aea6a5a5d1a4","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/35b0e542a9ff77046ed69ef602bc105d","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.11.14","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789-1","templateUuid":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789","name":"Knowledgeable Investor","description":"Traded more than 10 stocks","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e74cc24115c4fbae6154ec1b1041bf47","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d48265cbfd97c57f9048db29f22227b0","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76c6d6898b073c77e1c537ebe9ac1c57","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1102},{"badgeId":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84-1","templateUuid":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84","name":"Real Trader","description":"Completed a transaction","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100},{"badgeId":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be-1","templateUuid":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be","name":"Elite Trader","description":"Total number of securities or futures transactions reached 30","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ab0f87127c854ce3191a752d57b46edc","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c9835ce48b8c8743566d344ac7a7ba8c","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76754b53ce7a90019f132c1d2fbc698f","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":"60.13%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":4,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":null,"starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"post","tweets":[{"id":378521350,"gmtCreate":1619051523670,"gmtModify":1704718803977,"author":{"id":"3576336077780129","authorId":"3576336077780129","name":"moJoe","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/51b5f1e98cb521c4bd52447b0ea6e905","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3576336077780129","idStr":"3576336077780129"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"This will be next in line after gamestop ?.&nbsp; This is one of the most heavily shorted stock by hedge fxcks. A lot of volumes gone to this stock but still stuck at below 10. Hedge funds trying to manipulate market. Also try looking @ sundial always no1 on volumes and its on negatives most days. Try figuring that out. Even goods news it stays on red..","listText":"This will be next in line after gamestop ?.&nbsp; This is one of the most heavily shorted stock by hedge fxcks. A lot of volumes gone to this stock but still stuck at below 10. Hedge funds trying to manipulate market. Also try looking @ sundial always no1 on volumes and its on negatives most days. Try figuring that out. Even goods news it stays on red..","text":"This will be next in line after gamestop ?. This is one of the most heavily shorted stock by hedge fxcks. A lot of volumes gone to this stock but still stuck at below 10. Hedge funds trying to manipulate market. Also try looking @ sundial always no1 on volumes and its on negatives most days. Try figuring that out. Even goods news it stays on red..","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/378521350","repostId":"1125387983","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1125387983","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1618894905,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1125387983?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-04-20 13:01","market":"us","language":"en","title":"AMC Stock: 3 Reasons to Stay Away Despite Recent 9% Uptick","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1125387983","media":"InvestorPlace","summary":"Management will ask stockholders to greenlight the issue of 500 million new shares in early May.\n\nTh","content":"<blockquote>\n Management will ask stockholders to greenlight the issue of 500 million new shares in early May.\n</blockquote>\n<p>There is never a dull moment when tracking meme stocks. And now one of the most prominent ones,<b>AMC</b>(NYSE:<b><u>AMC</u></b>), is in trouble yet again. In aninterviewwith social-media finance commentator Trey Collins, CEO Adam Aron said short sellers are encircling AMC stock.</p>\n<p>This marks yet another twist in a gripping story that continues to add chapters with every passing day. For all intents and purposes, the movie-theater chain was staring down the barrel when<b>Reddit</b>investors rescued the company from the depths of bankruptcy.</p>\n<p>Since that time, it has chosen to make hay while the sun shines, raising a substantial amount of cash through equity issues. However, even before the novel coronavirus pandemic struck, AMC was suffering.</p>\n<p>That’s because there has been a substantial shift in how Americans watch movies. Box office sales reached their high in 2002 at1.58 billion tickets, eventually dropping 22% to 1.23 billion tickets by 2019. Simultaneously, we saw an increasing shift towards home viewing, helped greatly by the emergence of streaming companies.</p>\n<p>And then Covid-19 hit the industry like a ton of bricks.</p>\n<p>Movie-theater chains<b>Arclight Cinemas</b>and<b>Pacific Theaters</b>have alreadyshuttered their doorspermanently. Others are massively restructuring their operations to survive this crisis.</p>\n<p>Hence, it’s understandable why Aron praised retail investors in his recent discussion — the subreddit r/WallStreetBets essentially bailed out the company, punishing short sellers in the process. But financial realities will eventually push the stock close to its 52-week low of $1.91 per share. I’m afraid the show’s over for AMC stock.</p>\n<p><b>Share Dilution Will Continue to Hurt AMC Stock</b></p>\n<p>AMC is paying the price of survival and it’s a steep one. At the end of 2019, AMC had nearly 104 million shares. As I write this, the movie-chain operator now has some 450 million shares. That’s about a 333% rise in a year.</p>\n<p>Now, I get it. AMC needs money to survive this pandemic and beyond. Movie theaters will need several business cycles to get back on their feet.</p>\n<p>True,about 25% of the U.S. populationhas been fully vaccinated as of today. However, it will take time for movie-ticket sales to return to pre-pandemic levels. In the meantime, AMC still needs money to survive.</p>\n<p>As such, on May 4, the company is set to host its annual meeting and ask stockholders to greenlight the issue of another 500 million new shares. Aron has said that AMC will not issue any new stock this year, an announcement that pushed shares up 9%.</p>\n<p>Nevertheless, the writing is on the wall. If you remain committed to AMC stock, dilution is something that you will have to bear for the foreseeable future.</p>\n<p><b>Fundamentals Have Been Sliding For a While</b></p>\n<p>Although the pandemic has devastated movie-theater chains, the slowdown in ticket sales is a secular trend, as we touched upon earlier. In fiscal 2019, the movie-theater chain reported a net loss of $13.5 million, compared to net income of $170.6 million in the year-before quarter. Bear in mind that these figures are from before the pandemic.</p>\n<p>On top of that, out of the last eight quarters,the company has reported an earnings beat just onceaccording to&nbsp;<i>CNBC</i>data. Meanwhile, operating costs are ballooning. As my colleague Vandita Jadejahighlighted in her recent AMC piece, despite the top-line falling by over 75%, operating costs did not fall by as much.</p>\n<p>This all leaves the company vulnerable to further dilution and expensive debt raises. It’s a clear red flag for AMC stock investors that are looking for management to take more of a proactive approach with this crisis.</p>\n<p><b>Evolution Has Just Passed You By</b></p>\n<p>Even if AMC survives this crisis — which by most measures it should — it still operates a largely outdated business model.</p>\n<p>Streaming is all the rage these days.<b>Netflix</b>(NASDAQ:<b><u>NFLX</u></b>),<b>Amazon</b>(NASDAQ:<b><u>AMZN</u></b>),<b>Disney</b>(NYSE:<b><u>DIS</u></b>) and<b>AT&amp;T</b>(NYSE:<b><u>T</u></b>) are firmly entrenched in the streaming wars, pouring billions into original content. As of Q4 2020, Netflix is in first place withover 200 million paid subscribersworldwide, but others are catching up as well and using some pretty innovative techniques.</p>\n<p>Late last year, Warner Bros. announced it woulddebut all of its 2021 movies in theaters and on HBO Max simultaneouslyin the United States. Meanwhile, Netflix is set to release a new movie every week in 2021.</p>\n<p>Against this backdrop, AMC and other movie-theater chains are left to fend for themselves as streaming companies compete for attention.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/72e23fe7ed32e5b689a35813204c6b0d\" tg-width=\"908\" tg-height=\"376\">And even if these announcements did not take place, the writing has been on the wall for a while. Its pretty evident when you pit AMC stock’s performance against the<b>S&amp;P 500</b>that the company has been fighting a losing battle.</p>\n<p><b>Final Words on AMC</b></p>\n<p>I get the feeling that AMC is on its greatest-hits tour. Yes, you might want to invest in AMC stock out of a sense of nostalgia. But in my opinion, the company’s best days are behind it.</p>\n<p>Looking ahead, 5G, artificial intelligence, data analytics and the Internet of Things (IoT) are some of the subjects you need to get behind instead. These areas will be the biggest source of future growth and profitability moving forward.</p>\n<p>Basically, the credits are beginning to roll for AMC.</p>","source":"lsy1606302653667","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>AMC Stock: 3 Reasons to Stay Away Despite Recent 9% Uptick</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAMC Stock: 3 Reasons to Stay Away Despite Recent 9% Uptick\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-04-20 13:01 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://investorplace.com/2021/04/amc-stock-three-reasons-stay-away-despite-recent-uptick/><strong>InvestorPlace</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Management will ask stockholders to greenlight the issue of 500 million new shares in early May.\n\nThere is never a dull moment when tracking meme stocks. And now one of the most prominent ones,AMC(...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://investorplace.com/2021/04/amc-stock-three-reasons-stay-away-despite-recent-uptick/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AMC":"AMC院线"},"source_url":"https://investorplace.com/2021/04/amc-stock-three-reasons-stay-away-despite-recent-uptick/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1125387983","content_text":"Management will ask stockholders to greenlight the issue of 500 million new shares in early May.\n\nThere is never a dull moment when tracking meme stocks. And now one of the most prominent ones,AMC(NYSE:AMC), is in trouble yet again. In aninterviewwith social-media finance commentator Trey Collins, CEO Adam Aron said short sellers are encircling AMC stock.\nThis marks yet another twist in a gripping story that continues to add chapters with every passing day. For all intents and purposes, the movie-theater chain was staring down the barrel whenRedditinvestors rescued the company from the depths of bankruptcy.\nSince that time, it has chosen to make hay while the sun shines, raising a substantial amount of cash through equity issues. However, even before the novel coronavirus pandemic struck, AMC was suffering.\nThat’s because there has been a substantial shift in how Americans watch movies. Box office sales reached their high in 2002 at1.58 billion tickets, eventually dropping 22% to 1.23 billion tickets by 2019. Simultaneously, we saw an increasing shift towards home viewing, helped greatly by the emergence of streaming companies.\nAnd then Covid-19 hit the industry like a ton of bricks.\nMovie-theater chainsArclight CinemasandPacific Theatershave alreadyshuttered their doorspermanently. Others are massively restructuring their operations to survive this crisis.\nHence, it’s understandable why Aron praised retail investors in his recent discussion — the subreddit r/WallStreetBets essentially bailed out the company, punishing short sellers in the process. But financial realities will eventually push the stock close to its 52-week low of $1.91 per share. I’m afraid the show’s over for AMC stock.\nShare Dilution Will Continue to Hurt AMC Stock\nAMC is paying the price of survival and it’s a steep one. At the end of 2019, AMC had nearly 104 million shares. As I write this, the movie-chain operator now has some 450 million shares. That’s about a 333% rise in a year.\nNow, I get it. AMC needs money to survive this pandemic and beyond. Movie theaters will need several business cycles to get back on their feet.\nTrue,about 25% of the U.S. populationhas been fully vaccinated as of today. However, it will take time for movie-ticket sales to return to pre-pandemic levels. In the meantime, AMC still needs money to survive.\nAs such, on May 4, the company is set to host its annual meeting and ask stockholders to greenlight the issue of another 500 million new shares. Aron has said that AMC will not issue any new stock this year, an announcement that pushed shares up 9%.\nNevertheless, the writing is on the wall. If you remain committed to AMC stock, dilution is something that you will have to bear for the foreseeable future.\nFundamentals Have Been Sliding For a While\nAlthough the pandemic has devastated movie-theater chains, the slowdown in ticket sales is a secular trend, as we touched upon earlier. In fiscal 2019, the movie-theater chain reported a net loss of $13.5 million, compared to net income of $170.6 million in the year-before quarter. Bear in mind that these figures are from before the pandemic.\nOn top of that, out of the last eight quarters,the company has reported an earnings beat just onceaccording to CNBCdata. Meanwhile, operating costs are ballooning. As my colleague Vandita Jadejahighlighted in her recent AMC piece, despite the top-line falling by over 75%, operating costs did not fall by as much.\nThis all leaves the company vulnerable to further dilution and expensive debt raises. It’s a clear red flag for AMC stock investors that are looking for management to take more of a proactive approach with this crisis.\nEvolution Has Just Passed You By\nEven if AMC survives this crisis — which by most measures it should — it still operates a largely outdated business model.\nStreaming is all the rage these days.Netflix(NASDAQ:NFLX),Amazon(NASDAQ:AMZN),Disney(NYSE:DIS) andAT&T(NYSE:T) are firmly entrenched in the streaming wars, pouring billions into original content. As of Q4 2020, Netflix is in first place withover 200 million paid subscribersworldwide, but others are catching up as well and using some pretty innovative techniques.\nLate last year, Warner Bros. announced it woulddebut all of its 2021 movies in theaters and on HBO Max simultaneouslyin the United States. Meanwhile, Netflix is set to release a new movie every week in 2021.\nAgainst this backdrop, AMC and other movie-theater chains are left to fend for themselves as streaming companies compete for attention.\nAnd even if these announcements did not take place, the writing has been on the wall for a while. Its pretty evident when you pit AMC stock’s performance against theS&P 500that the company has been fighting a losing battle.\nFinal Words on AMC\nI get the feeling that AMC is on its greatest-hits tour. Yes, you might want to invest in AMC stock out of a sense of nostalgia. But in my opinion, the company’s best days are behind it.\nLooking ahead, 5G, artificial intelligence, data analytics and the Internet of Things (IoT) are some of the subjects you need to get behind instead. These areas will be the biggest source of future growth and profitability moving forward.\nBasically, the credits are beginning to roll for AMC.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":764,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":347141878,"gmtCreate":1618478236595,"gmtModify":1704711449720,"author":{"id":"3576336077780129","authorId":"3576336077780129","name":"moJoe","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/51b5f1e98cb521c4bd52447b0ea6e905","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3576336077780129","idStr":"3576336077780129"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Time to buy now.","listText":"Time to buy now.","text":"Time to buy now.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/347141878","repostId":"1141781678","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":583,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":345036188,"gmtCreate":1618258403044,"gmtModify":1704708202183,"author":{"id":"3576336077780129","authorId":"3576336077780129","name":"moJoe","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/51b5f1e98cb521c4bd52447b0ea6e905","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3576336077780129","idStr":"3576336077780129"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"How will it fade away....hahaha. mevin capital lossing 49% in the quarter says it all. They are getting squeezed out by retailer by holding stocks. Its a matter of time, the other 51% will be gone. Buy the dip. Hold the bananas.","listText":"How will it fade away....hahaha. mevin capital lossing 49% in the quarter says it all. They are getting squeezed out by retailer by holding stocks. Its a matter of time, the other 51% will be gone. Buy the dip. Hold the bananas.","text":"How will it fade away....hahaha. mevin capital lossing 49% in the quarter says it all. They are getting squeezed out by retailer by holding stocks. Its a matter of time, the other 51% will be gone. Buy the dip. Hold the bananas.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/345036188","repostId":"1188840982","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1188840982","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1618237983,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1188840982?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-04-12 22:33","market":"us","language":"en","title":"GameStop plunged more than 10%, GameStop Skeptic Warns That Reddit Rally Will Fade","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1188840982","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"(April 12) GameStop plunged more than 10%，GameStop Skeptic Warns That Reddit Rally Will Fade; Shares","content":"<p>(April 12)&nbsp;GameStop plunged more than 10%，GameStop Skeptic Warns That Reddit Rally Will Fade; Shares Slump.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0e0e81ec43e109abaa82e6aae6fe9a36\" tg-width=\"663\" tg-height=\"564\">GameStop Corp.’s Reddit-fueled trading surge is likely going to fade as threats from digital game downloads sink in, according to one skeptical Wall Street analyst.</p>\n<p>The stock slumped after Ascendiant Capital Markets analyst Edward Woo downgraded the retailer to sell from hold, saying increasing digital sales for video-game publishers is a looming risk given GameStop’s minimal market share. He warned clients in a note about the long-term prospects for the company as the market for new gaming systems matures after new launches from Microsoft Corp. and Sony Group Corp.</p>\n<p>The video-game retailer’s 741% surge this year through Friday’s close pushed its market value to $11 billion, however, Woo expects shares will tumble in the long run “to match its current weak results and outlook.” He trimmed his price target to $10 from $12, implying as much as a 94% drop from Friday’s close at $158.36.</p>\n<p>Shares of the Grapevine, Texas-based company reversed initial gains to slump as much as 11% at 9:58 a.m. in New York. The stock has shed a quarter of its value in the past six session after a company plan to sell as much as $1 billion in additional shares.</p>\n<p>Ascendiant called out the rise in popularity of GameStop on Reddit chat boards and with Robinhood investors for making shares trade on “retail investors sentiment, hope, momentum, and the powers of crowds” in place of fundamental metrics. Woo did acknowledge the mania can drive shares much higher in the near-term, making short-term price forecasts “nearly impossible.”</p>\n<p>The stock now has five sell-equivalent ratings, compared to two hold ratings and zero buys, data compiled by Bloomberg show. An average price target of $46.50 implies shares will lose more than two-thirds of their value in the coming year.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>GameStop plunged more than 10%, GameStop Skeptic Warns That Reddit Rally Will Fade</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nGameStop plunged more than 10%, GameStop Skeptic Warns That Reddit Rally Will Fade\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-04-12 22:33</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>(April 12)&nbsp;GameStop plunged more than 10%，GameStop Skeptic Warns That Reddit Rally Will Fade; Shares Slump.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0e0e81ec43e109abaa82e6aae6fe9a36\" tg-width=\"663\" tg-height=\"564\">GameStop Corp.’s Reddit-fueled trading surge is likely going to fade as threats from digital game downloads sink in, according to one skeptical Wall Street analyst.</p>\n<p>The stock slumped after Ascendiant Capital Markets analyst Edward Woo downgraded the retailer to sell from hold, saying increasing digital sales for video-game publishers is a looming risk given GameStop’s minimal market share. He warned clients in a note about the long-term prospects for the company as the market for new gaming systems matures after new launches from Microsoft Corp. and Sony Group Corp.</p>\n<p>The video-game retailer’s 741% surge this year through Friday’s close pushed its market value to $11 billion, however, Woo expects shares will tumble in the long run “to match its current weak results and outlook.” He trimmed his price target to $10 from $12, implying as much as a 94% drop from Friday’s close at $158.36.</p>\n<p>Shares of the Grapevine, Texas-based company reversed initial gains to slump as much as 11% at 9:58 a.m. in New York. The stock has shed a quarter of its value in the past six session after a company plan to sell as much as $1 billion in additional shares.</p>\n<p>Ascendiant called out the rise in popularity of GameStop on Reddit chat boards and with Robinhood investors for making shares trade on “retail investors sentiment, hope, momentum, and the powers of crowds” in place of fundamental metrics. Woo did acknowledge the mania can drive shares much higher in the near-term, making short-term price forecasts “nearly impossible.”</p>\n<p>The stock now has five sell-equivalent ratings, compared to two hold ratings and zero buys, data compiled by Bloomberg show. An average price target of $46.50 implies shares will lose more than two-thirds of their value in the coming year.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"GME":"游戏驿站"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1188840982","content_text":"(April 12) GameStop plunged more than 10%，GameStop Skeptic Warns That Reddit Rally Will Fade; Shares Slump.\nGameStop Corp.’s Reddit-fueled trading surge is likely going to fade as threats from digital game downloads sink in, according to one skeptical Wall Street analyst.\nThe stock slumped after Ascendiant Capital Markets analyst Edward Woo downgraded the retailer to sell from hold, saying increasing digital sales for video-game publishers is a looming risk given GameStop’s minimal market share. He warned clients in a note about the long-term prospects for the company as the market for new gaming systems matures after new launches from Microsoft Corp. and Sony Group Corp.\nThe video-game retailer’s 741% surge this year through Friday’s close pushed its market value to $11 billion, however, Woo expects shares will tumble in the long run “to match its current weak results and outlook.” He trimmed his price target to $10 from $12, implying as much as a 94% drop from Friday’s close at $158.36.\nShares of the Grapevine, Texas-based company reversed initial gains to slump as much as 11% at 9:58 a.m. in New York. The stock has shed a quarter of its value in the past six session after a company plan to sell as much as $1 billion in additional shares.\nAscendiant called out the rise in popularity of GameStop on Reddit chat boards and with Robinhood investors for making shares trade on “retail investors sentiment, hope, momentum, and the powers of crowds” in place of fundamental metrics. Woo did acknowledge the mania can drive shares much higher in the near-term, making short-term price forecasts “nearly impossible.”\nThe stock now has five sell-equivalent ratings, compared to two hold ratings and zero buys, data compiled by Bloomberg show. An average price target of $46.50 implies shares will lose more than two-thirds of their value in the coming year.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":659,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":358198103,"gmtCreate":1616670481002,"gmtModify":1704797161596,"author":{"id":"3576336077780129","authorId":"3576336077780129","name":"moJoe","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/51b5f1e98cb521c4bd52447b0ea6e905","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3576336077780129","idStr":"3576336077780129"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"No doubt. Tesla is the frontier of the technology.","listText":"No doubt. Tesla is the frontier of the technology.","text":"No doubt. Tesla is the frontier of the technology.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/358198103","repostId":"1170151822","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":556,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":358903255,"gmtCreate":1616646181077,"gmtModify":1704796871392,"author":{"id":"3576336077780129","authorId":"3576336077780129","name":"moJoe","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/51b5f1e98cb521c4bd52447b0ea6e905","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3576336077780129","idStr":"3576336077780129"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"On my opinion and probably evertones, you havent lost anything until you sell your shares. So keep hodling the line dont budge. Diamond hands, hedge funds are felling the pinch..","listText":"On my opinion and probably evertones, you havent lost anything until you sell your shares. So keep hodling the line dont budge. Diamond hands, hedge funds are felling the pinch..","text":"On my opinion and probably evertones, you havent lost anything until you sell your shares. So keep hodling the line dont budge. Diamond hands, hedge funds are felling the pinch..","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/358903255","repostId":"1110970491","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1110970491","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1616632658,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1110970491?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-03-25 08:37","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Tech and GameStop losses have traders wondering if retail investors are losing interest in market","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1110970491","media":"cnbc","summary":"It was a bad day for Cathie Wood.\nAnd it was a very strange trading day.\nFor weeks, stocks have been","content":"<div>\n<p>It was a bad day for Cathie Wood.\nAnd it was a very strange trading day.\nFor weeks, stocks have been held hostage to Treasury yields, particularly the 10-year.  As yields moved up, stocks, ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/03/24/tech-and-gamestop-losses-have-traders-wondering-if-retail-investors-are-losing-interest-in-market.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"cnbc_highlight","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Tech and GameStop losses have traders wondering if retail investors are losing interest in market</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTech and GameStop losses have traders wondering if retail investors are losing interest in market\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-03-25 08:37 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.cnbc.com/2021/03/24/tech-and-gamestop-losses-have-traders-wondering-if-retail-investors-are-losing-interest-in-market.html><strong>cnbc</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>It was a bad day for Cathie Wood.\nAnd it was a very strange trading day.\nFor weeks, stocks have been held hostage to Treasury yields, particularly the 10-year.  As yields moved up, stocks, ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/03/24/tech-and-gamestop-losses-have-traders-wondering-if-retail-investors-are-losing-interest-in-market.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"GME":"游戏驿站"},"source_url":"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/03/24/tech-and-gamestop-losses-have-traders-wondering-if-retail-investors-are-losing-interest-in-market.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/72bb72e1b84c09fca865c6dcb1bbcd16","article_id":"1110970491","content_text":"It was a bad day for Cathie Wood.\nAnd it was a very strange trading day.\nFor weeks, stocks have been held hostage to Treasury yields, particularly the 10-year.  As yields moved up, stocks, particularly high-multiple megacap stocks, moved down.  If yields dropped, tech rallied.\nThat relationship has broken down.\nYields have been down three days in a row, yet tech did not react.\nMegacap tech like Facebook, Amazon, Apple, Micron, and Xilinx were down 1.5% to 3%.\nMore importantly, the market's favoritehigh-growth names got clobbered.\nWood'sARK Innovation Fund (ARKK), a bellwether for the big-growth tech crowd, was down 5% and is now 28% off the 52-week high it hit on February 16, which is just when interest rates starting moving up.\nArk Innovation Fund on Wednesday\n(largest holdings)\n\nCrispr  down 9%\nBaidu down 9%\nZoom down 7%\nRokudown 7%\nTeladoc down 6%.\n\n\"You'd think with all this stimulus, money would be pouring into Cathie Wood [funds], and it's just not happening,\" Josh Brown, CEO of Ritholtz Wealth Management, said on CNBC.\n Are retail traders losing interest?\nOne major surprise has been a pullback in volume.  The NYSE volume was 80% of the 30-day average, Nasdaq activity was 90% of the average, unusually low volume given the declines in certain sectors.\n\"Volume was heavy for Triple Witching last Friday, but Monday, Tuesday and today volumes have been light,\" Rich Repetto from Piper Sandler told me\nHave retail traders, who have been such a large part of the increase in volume last year, suddenly lost interest?\n\"It seems to show that the retail customer has walked away,\" Matt Maley from Miller Tabak told me.  \"The question is, why? Is it higher rates?  Concerns about lockdowns? Or are they betting on March Madness?\"\nAnother example:  Reddit favorite GameStop wasdown all day on disappointing earningsbut collapsed going into the close, down 33%. But only 23 million shares changed hands, well short of the 30-day average of 34 million shares.\nLow volume on a big down day implies not a lot of owners interested in selling, but also not many buyers interested in purchasing, even with shares down over 30%.\nSame with another Reddit-crowd favorite:  AMC, down 15% on volume two-thirds of its average.\nIs Cathie Wood the key?\nFor the high-beta, high-growth, high-momentum crowd, watching Wood has been an obsession.  Maley says the flagship Ark Innovation fund is now set up for a key technical test.\n\n\"The closing low for ARK was $110.26 on March 8th,\" he told me.  It bounced nicely off of that, but has been trending down for the last week, Maley noted.\n\"It closed today at $114. If it drops below that $110 level, that will be very negative on a technical basis,\" with the trader noting that a \"lower low\" is usually a negative indicator.\n\"If buy on weakness doesn't work this time, that is going to worry a lot of people,\" Maley said.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":532,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":358900867,"gmtCreate":1616646022059,"gmtModify":1704796868276,"author":{"id":"3576336077780129","authorId":"3576336077780129","name":"moJoe","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/51b5f1e98cb521c4bd52447b0ea6e905","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3576336077780129","idStr":"3576336077780129"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"And there you go folks the scare tactics of the media backed by the hedge funds..","listText":"And there you go folks the scare tactics of the media backed by the hedge funds..","text":"And there you go folks the scare tactics of the media backed by the hedge funds..","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":8,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/358900867","repostId":"1110970491","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1110970491","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1616632658,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1110970491?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-03-25 08:37","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Tech and GameStop losses have traders wondering if retail investors are losing interest in market","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1110970491","media":"cnbc","summary":"It was a bad day for Cathie Wood.\nAnd it was a very strange trading day.\nFor weeks, stocks have been","content":"<div>\n<p>It was a bad day for Cathie Wood.\nAnd it was a very strange trading day.\nFor weeks, stocks have been held hostage to Treasury yields, particularly the 10-year.  As yields moved up, stocks, ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/03/24/tech-and-gamestop-losses-have-traders-wondering-if-retail-investors-are-losing-interest-in-market.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"cnbc_highlight","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Tech and GameStop losses have traders wondering if retail investors are losing interest in market</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTech and GameStop losses have traders wondering if retail investors are losing interest in market\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-03-25 08:37 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.cnbc.com/2021/03/24/tech-and-gamestop-losses-have-traders-wondering-if-retail-investors-are-losing-interest-in-market.html><strong>cnbc</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>It was a bad day for Cathie Wood.\nAnd it was a very strange trading day.\nFor weeks, stocks have been held hostage to Treasury yields, particularly the 10-year.  As yields moved up, stocks, ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/03/24/tech-and-gamestop-losses-have-traders-wondering-if-retail-investors-are-losing-interest-in-market.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"GME":"游戏驿站"},"source_url":"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/03/24/tech-and-gamestop-losses-have-traders-wondering-if-retail-investors-are-losing-interest-in-market.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/72bb72e1b84c09fca865c6dcb1bbcd16","article_id":"1110970491","content_text":"It was a bad day for Cathie Wood.\nAnd it was a very strange trading day.\nFor weeks, stocks have been held hostage to Treasury yields, particularly the 10-year.  As yields moved up, stocks, particularly high-multiple megacap stocks, moved down.  If yields dropped, tech rallied.\nThat relationship has broken down.\nYields have been down three days in a row, yet tech did not react.\nMegacap tech like Facebook, Amazon, Apple, Micron, and Xilinx were down 1.5% to 3%.\nMore importantly, the market's favoritehigh-growth names got clobbered.\nWood'sARK Innovation Fund (ARKK), a bellwether for the big-growth tech crowd, was down 5% and is now 28% off the 52-week high it hit on February 16, which is just when interest rates starting moving up.\nArk Innovation Fund on Wednesday\n(largest holdings)\n\nCrispr  down 9%\nBaidu down 9%\nZoom down 7%\nRokudown 7%\nTeladoc down 6%.\n\n\"You'd think with all this stimulus, money would be pouring into Cathie Wood [funds], and it's just not happening,\" Josh Brown, CEO of Ritholtz Wealth Management, said on CNBC.\n Are retail traders losing interest?\nOne major surprise has been a pullback in volume.  The NYSE volume was 80% of the 30-day average, Nasdaq activity was 90% of the average, unusually low volume given the declines in certain sectors.\n\"Volume was heavy for Triple Witching last Friday, but Monday, Tuesday and today volumes have been light,\" Rich Repetto from Piper Sandler told me\nHave retail traders, who have been such a large part of the increase in volume last year, suddenly lost interest?\n\"It seems to show that the retail customer has walked away,\" Matt Maley from Miller Tabak told me.  \"The question is, why? Is it higher rates?  Concerns about lockdowns? Or are they betting on March Madness?\"\nAnother example:  Reddit favorite GameStop wasdown all day on disappointing earningsbut collapsed going into the close, down 33%. But only 23 million shares changed hands, well short of the 30-day average of 34 million shares.\nLow volume on a big down day implies not a lot of owners interested in selling, but also not many buyers interested in purchasing, even with shares down over 30%.\nSame with another Reddit-crowd favorite:  AMC, down 15% on volume two-thirds of its average.\nIs Cathie Wood the key?\nFor the high-beta, high-growth, high-momentum crowd, watching Wood has been an obsession.  Maley says the flagship Ark Innovation fund is now set up for a key technical test.\n\n\"The closing low for ARK was $110.26 on March 8th,\" he told me.  It bounced nicely off of that, but has been trending down for the last week, Maley noted.\n\"It closed today at $114. If it drops below that $110 level, that will be very negative on a technical basis,\" with the trader noting that a \"lower low\" is usually a negative indicator.\n\"If buy on weakness doesn't work this time, that is going to worry a lot of people,\" Maley said.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":799,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":351273095,"gmtCreate":1616600119117,"gmtModify":1704796319078,"author":{"id":"3576336077780129","authorId":"3576336077780129","name":"moJoe","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/51b5f1e98cb521c4bd52447b0ea6e905","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3576336077780129","idStr":"3576336077780129"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Its only a scare tactic. Hedge funds must be hurting bad..","listText":"Its only a scare tactic. Hedge funds must be hurting bad..","text":"Its only a scare tactic. Hedge funds must be hurting bad..","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/351273095","repostId":"2121457670","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2121457670","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1616597870,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2121457670?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-03-24 22:57","market":"us","language":"en","title":"4 Dangerous Robinhood Stocks That Could Lose 50% or More, According to Wall Street","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2121457670","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Retail investors could lose a boatload of money from these highly popular stocks.","content":"<p>It's possible that when the curtain closes on 2021, it'll be remembered as the year of the retail investor.</p><p>Since March 2020, we've seen a big uptick in the number of millennials who've put their money to work in the stock market. Online investing app Robinhood, which is known for its commission-free trading platform and gifting of free shares of stock to new users, attracted 3 million new members last year. That's noteworthy given the average age of Robinhood's user base is only 31.</p><p>On one hand, it's great to see young investors who have time as their ally putting money to work in the world's greatest wealth creator. On the other hand, quite a few of these young investors aren't thinking long term. Rather, they're caught up in the recent retail investor-fueled Reddit frenzy and looking to get rich quick.</p><p>The problem with the get-rich-quick strategy is that it rarely works -- and Wall Street knows it.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ebe3f403b1b970d0e231952ef9c1d01c\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>Image source: Getty Images.</span></p><p>At the moment, there are four widely held stocks on Robinhood that, according to Wall Street's <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a>-year consensus price targets, are expected to lose at least half their value, if not more. If these analyst estimates prove accurate, these dangerous Robinhood stocks could cost unsuspecting retail investors a boatload of money.</p><h2>GameStop: Implied downside of 93%</h2><p>Perhaps it's no surprise that the riskiest Robinhood stock of all is the company that started the Reddit frenzy, <b>GameStop</b> (NYSE:GME). Shares of the video game and accessories company are up nearly 4,700% over the past year, but offer 93% downside, if Wall Street's consensus is correct.</p><p>What made GameStop such a popular company to own among retail investors was its high short interest. Entering January, no public company had a higher percentage of shares held short, relative to its float. Because of this short interest, a flood of buyers were able to execute an epic short squeeze.</p><p>Unfortunately, most of the Reddit rally stocks have poor underlying fundamentals and/or a dubious long-term outlook. When it comes to GameStop, its biggest issue was waiting too long to focus on digital gaming. Even with its renewed focus on e-commerce, total sales for the company declined, once again, during the most recent holiday season. Further, GameStop is almost certainly staring down its fourth consecutive annual loss in 2021.</p><p>If there is some good news here, it's that GameStop isn't a lost cause. Eventually, it'll close enough stores to reduce its expenses to the point where it's profitable again. But there's a big difference between growth with a profit and backpedaling into a profit. GameStop is doing the latter, which is what has Wall Street rightly concerned.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1c6cb4d9fcdf85f542f333fc71a2dd58\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>Image source: Getty Images.</span></p><h2>AMC Entertainment: Implied downside of 75%</h2><p>Movie theater chain <b>AMC Entertainment</b> (NYSE:AMC), which has risen in lockstep with GameStop for much of the past two months, is also on Wall Street's naughty list. Putting aside the $0.01 price target recently issued by one analyst, the Wall Street consensus is that AMC will lose three-quarters of its value over the next year.</p><p>AMC's outperformance over the past two months has to do with Reddit traders piling into the company, as well as folks betting on the reopening trade. AMC recently announced that 99% of its theaters would be open by March 26.</p><p>However, this optimism looks highly flawed. Many of the company's theaters are still facing capacity restrictions, and there are no guarantees that the coronavirus pandemic will officially end in 2021. New variants of the disease, along with vaccine holdouts, threaten to push herd immunity and a return to normal further down the road.</p><p>The company's solvency is also a potential concern. Even with more than $1 billion in cash on hand, Wall Street is expecting AMC to lose more than $1.7 billion, total, over the next two years. This implies the need to issue more dilutive stock or more debt.</p><p>As the icing on the cake, AMC is also losing some of its new release exclusivity to streaming service providers. At long last, the movie theater industry is being disrupted -- but that's not a good thing for AMC.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/91f6037829ea3fb0ae1cae0b95d8d11e\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>Image source: Getty Images.</span></p><h2>Riot Blockchain: Implied downside of 54%</h2><p>Wall Street also views cryptocurrency mining stock <b>Riot Blockchain</b> (NASDAQ:RIOT) as a dangerous investment. The 76th most-held stock on Robinhood is projected to lose 54% of its value over the next year, according to analysts on Wall Street.</p><p>Riot Blockchain's incredible outperformance in recent months can be tied to the rally in <b>Bitcoin</b> (CRYPTO:BTC), the world's largest digital currency. As a cryptocurrency miner, Riot uses high-powered computers to validate groups of transactions (known as blocks) on Bitcoin's network. For validating blocks, Riot is given a block reward totaling 6.25 Bitcoin (worth about $365,000). In short, the higher Bitcoin goes, the more these block rewards are worth.</p><p>While this sounds like a pretty straightforward investment, it's not that simple. For example, the asset Riot is \"mining\" has had three separate instances over the past decade where it's lost at least 80% of its value. It's not clear if mining companies could survive such a protracted downtrend in Bitcoin.</p><p>It's equally concerning that Riot Blockchain's future is entirely tethered to the performance of Bitcoin. This is an operating model that's pretty much devoid of innovation and is constantly facing a growing number of competitors. Add on the halving of Bitcoin's block rewards every couple of years, and I believe there's more than enough incentive to stay far away from Riot Blockchain.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5811406aed4001edc942cb25310a21cf\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"467\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>Image source: Getty Images.</span></p><h2>Sundial Growers: Implied downside of 54%</h2><p>Finally, Wall Street views the fourth most-held Robinhood stock, <b>Sundial Growers</b> (NASDAQ:SNDL), as trouble. Shares of Canadian marijuana stock Sundial are higher by more than 900% since late October.</p><p>Similar to GameStop and AMC, Sundial and its high short interest have benefited from the Reddit frenzy. Investors also appear to be betting on the U.S. legalizing cannabis at the federal level. Doing so would allow Canadian marijuana stocks like Sundial to enter the far more lucrative U.S. weed market.</p><p>But if there's something tenured investors are very familiar with, it's the idea that all next-big-thing investments have losers. Even though marijuana is expected to be one of the fastest-growing industries this decade, Sundial hasn't demonstrated anything from an operational perspective to suggest that it'd be a winner.</p><p>One thing Sundial has done successfully is drown its existing investors in a sea of new shares. In a roughly five-month span, the company issued more than 1.15 billion shares via at-the-market offerings, registered direct offerings, and debt-to-equity swaps. Retail investors are quick to point to Sundial's mountain of new cash raised as a positive, but fail to see how the company's massive share count will cripple its potential for a long time to come.</p><p>With it looking less likely that the U.S. federal government will change its tune on cannabis at the federal level, and Sundial delivering ongoing losses and mediocre sales growth, it qualifies as the No. 1 pot stock worth avoiding.</p>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>4 Dangerous Robinhood Stocks That Could Lose 50% or More, According to Wall Street</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n4 Dangerous Robinhood Stocks That Could Lose 50% or More, According to Wall Street\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-03-24 22:57 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/03/24/4-dangerous-robinhood-stocks-lose-50-wall-street/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>It's possible that when the curtain closes on 2021, it'll be remembered as the year of the retail investor.Since March 2020, we've seen a big uptick in the number of millennials who've put their money...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/03/24/4-dangerous-robinhood-stocks-lose-50-wall-street/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"GME":"游戏驿站","SNDL":"SNDL Inc.","RIOT":"Riot Platforms","AMC":"AMC院线"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/03/24/4-dangerous-robinhood-stocks-lose-50-wall-street/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2121457670","content_text":"It's possible that when the curtain closes on 2021, it'll be remembered as the year of the retail investor.Since March 2020, we've seen a big uptick in the number of millennials who've put their money to work in the stock market. Online investing app Robinhood, which is known for its commission-free trading platform and gifting of free shares of stock to new users, attracted 3 million new members last year. That's noteworthy given the average age of Robinhood's user base is only 31.On one hand, it's great to see young investors who have time as their ally putting money to work in the world's greatest wealth creator. On the other hand, quite a few of these young investors aren't thinking long term. Rather, they're caught up in the recent retail investor-fueled Reddit frenzy and looking to get rich quick.The problem with the get-rich-quick strategy is that it rarely works -- and Wall Street knows it.Image source: Getty Images.At the moment, there are four widely held stocks on Robinhood that, according to Wall Street's one-year consensus price targets, are expected to lose at least half their value, if not more. If these analyst estimates prove accurate, these dangerous Robinhood stocks could cost unsuspecting retail investors a boatload of money.GameStop: Implied downside of 93%Perhaps it's no surprise that the riskiest Robinhood stock of all is the company that started the Reddit frenzy, GameStop (NYSE:GME). Shares of the video game and accessories company are up nearly 4,700% over the past year, but offer 93% downside, if Wall Street's consensus is correct.What made GameStop such a popular company to own among retail investors was its high short interest. Entering January, no public company had a higher percentage of shares held short, relative to its float. Because of this short interest, a flood of buyers were able to execute an epic short squeeze.Unfortunately, most of the Reddit rally stocks have poor underlying fundamentals and/or a dubious long-term outlook. When it comes to GameStop, its biggest issue was waiting too long to focus on digital gaming. Even with its renewed focus on e-commerce, total sales for the company declined, once again, during the most recent holiday season. Further, GameStop is almost certainly staring down its fourth consecutive annual loss in 2021.If there is some good news here, it's that GameStop isn't a lost cause. Eventually, it'll close enough stores to reduce its expenses to the point where it's profitable again. But there's a big difference between growth with a profit and backpedaling into a profit. GameStop is doing the latter, which is what has Wall Street rightly concerned.Image source: Getty Images.AMC Entertainment: Implied downside of 75%Movie theater chain AMC Entertainment (NYSE:AMC), which has risen in lockstep with GameStop for much of the past two months, is also on Wall Street's naughty list. Putting aside the $0.01 price target recently issued by one analyst, the Wall Street consensus is that AMC will lose three-quarters of its value over the next year.AMC's outperformance over the past two months has to do with Reddit traders piling into the company, as well as folks betting on the reopening trade. AMC recently announced that 99% of its theaters would be open by March 26.However, this optimism looks highly flawed. Many of the company's theaters are still facing capacity restrictions, and there are no guarantees that the coronavirus pandemic will officially end in 2021. New variants of the disease, along with vaccine holdouts, threaten to push herd immunity and a return to normal further down the road.The company's solvency is also a potential concern. Even with more than $1 billion in cash on hand, Wall Street is expecting AMC to lose more than $1.7 billion, total, over the next two years. This implies the need to issue more dilutive stock or more debt.As the icing on the cake, AMC is also losing some of its new release exclusivity to streaming service providers. At long last, the movie theater industry is being disrupted -- but that's not a good thing for AMC.Image source: Getty Images.Riot Blockchain: Implied downside of 54%Wall Street also views cryptocurrency mining stock Riot Blockchain (NASDAQ:RIOT) as a dangerous investment. The 76th most-held stock on Robinhood is projected to lose 54% of its value over the next year, according to analysts on Wall Street.Riot Blockchain's incredible outperformance in recent months can be tied to the rally in Bitcoin (CRYPTO:BTC), the world's largest digital currency. As a cryptocurrency miner, Riot uses high-powered computers to validate groups of transactions (known as blocks) on Bitcoin's network. For validating blocks, Riot is given a block reward totaling 6.25 Bitcoin (worth about $365,000). In short, the higher Bitcoin goes, the more these block rewards are worth.While this sounds like a pretty straightforward investment, it's not that simple. For example, the asset Riot is \"mining\" has had three separate instances over the past decade where it's lost at least 80% of its value. It's not clear if mining companies could survive such a protracted downtrend in Bitcoin.It's equally concerning that Riot Blockchain's future is entirely tethered to the performance of Bitcoin. This is an operating model that's pretty much devoid of innovation and is constantly facing a growing number of competitors. Add on the halving of Bitcoin's block rewards every couple of years, and I believe there's more than enough incentive to stay far away from Riot Blockchain.Image source: Getty Images.Sundial Growers: Implied downside of 54%Finally, Wall Street views the fourth most-held Robinhood stock, Sundial Growers (NASDAQ:SNDL), as trouble. Shares of Canadian marijuana stock Sundial are higher by more than 900% since late October.Similar to GameStop and AMC, Sundial and its high short interest have benefited from the Reddit frenzy. Investors also appear to be betting on the U.S. legalizing cannabis at the federal level. Doing so would allow Canadian marijuana stocks like Sundial to enter the far more lucrative U.S. weed market.But if there's something tenured investors are very familiar with, it's the idea that all next-big-thing investments have losers. Even though marijuana is expected to be one of the fastest-growing industries this decade, Sundial hasn't demonstrated anything from an operational perspective to suggest that it'd be a winner.One thing Sundial has done successfully is drown its existing investors in a sea of new shares. In a roughly five-month span, the company issued more than 1.15 billion shares via at-the-market offerings, registered direct offerings, and debt-to-equity swaps. Retail investors are quick to point to Sundial's mountain of new cash raised as a positive, but fail to see how the company's massive share count will cripple its potential for a long time to come.With it looking less likely that the U.S. federal government will change its tune on cannabis at the federal level, and Sundial delivering ongoing losses and mediocre sales growth, it qualifies as the No. 1 pot stock worth avoiding.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":446,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":351189841,"gmtCreate":1616574933683,"gmtModify":1704795842817,"author":{"id":"3576336077780129","authorId":"3576336077780129","name":"moJoe","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/51b5f1e98cb521c4bd52447b0ea6e905","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3576336077780129","idStr":"3576336077780129"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Interesting. Its cathie the gooddess.","listText":"Interesting. Its cathie the gooddess.","text":"Interesting. Its cathie the gooddess.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/351189841","repostId":"1103096316","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1103096316","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1616547729,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1103096316?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-03-24 09:02","market":"us","language":"en","title":"2 Under-the-Radar Nasdaq Stocks Cathie Wood Loves Right Now","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1103096316","media":"fool","summary":"Nasdaq Compositeis a hotbed of innovation, and the bull market in disruptive stocks in 2020 helped g","content":"<p><b>Nasdaq Composite</b>is a hotbed of innovation, and the bull market in disruptive stocks in 2020 helped give theNasdaqone of its best years ever. Recently, though, the Nasdaq's rise has taken a bit of a pause.</p><p>ARK Invest's CEO and chief investment officer, Cathie Wood, has gotten a lot of notoriety for her stock picking prowess over the past year, largely because she's embraced some of the best stocks on the Nasdaq.<b>Tesla</b>is the best-known of Wood's top picks, and odds are you already know as much as you want to know about the electric vehicle specialist. However, some other Nasdaq stocks aren't as familiar to ordinary investors even though they have their own opportunities to soar in the years ahead. Below, we'll look at two of the stocks you'll find prominently among ARK Invest exchange-traded fund (ETF) holdings that probably haven't made it onto your radar screen.</p><p>A play on automation</p><p><b>Trimble</b>(NASDAQ:TRMB)isn't a new company, but it has quickly become one of Wood's favorite picks. The stock is the third-largest position in ARK Invest's<b>Autonomous Technology &amp; Robotics ETF</b>, making up more than $180 million at recent prices. That's not a huge amount by ARK's standards, but it gives the fund manager a 1% stake in Trimble.</p><p>Founded more than 40 years ago, Trimble's software, hardware, and services are geared toward modeling, data analytics, connectivity, and positioning. Trimble serves a vast array of industries ranging from transportation and utilities to agriculture, construction, and geospacial surveys and mapping.</p><p>ARK Invest has long been afan of Trimble. In the agricultural space, Trimble's systems have allowed automated farm equipment to use global positioning system navigation to maximize planting, fertilizing, and harvesting efficiency. Trimble will likely play a role in space exploration as well, adding to its optionality.</p><p>Trimble shares have doubled since last April, but the company has considerable growth potential. There's room for Trimble's stock to keep rising if it can keep capitalizing on opportunities in automation, and with the share price down almost 5% on Tuesday, investors would get a bit of a bargain on Trimble currently.</p><p>A new Twist on genetics</p><p>Meanwhile, ARK Invest has made an even bigger investment in genetics specialist<b>Twist Bioscience</b>(NASDAQ:TWST). The company weighs in at No. 5 among holdings of the<b>ARK Genomic Revolution Multi-Sector ETF</b>(NYSEMKT:ARKG), and the nearly $420 million ARK Invest has invested in Twist amounts to about 7% of Twist's outstanding shares. Twist's stock has been extremely volatile lately, having risen as much as eightfold from its lows last year before falling back by about a third since mid-January.</p><p>Twist's business centers on DNA synthesis, with a cutting-edge genomic sequencing system that can produce viable synthetic genetic material for use in experiments at biotech and biopharmaceutical companies and research institutions. Wood has identified Twist's ability to help clinicians find signals indicating potential cancer as groundbreaking in the field, with the capacity to enable earlier detection and likely save large numbers of lives.</p><p>At this stage, Twist is going through a pattern that's familiar to high-growth investors. In its most recent quarterly numbers,Twist reported a 64% jump in revenue, with losses narrowing from year-earlier levels. Yet the stock failed to gain ground, leading some to conclude that its recent gains precluded it from benefiting from the good news on the business fundamentals front. Shares are down another 2% on Tuesday afternoon, but that only makes the value proposition that much better for those interested in the genomics stock.</p><p>Keep your eyes on Wood's buys</p><p>Even Cathie Wood doesn't bat a thousand with her stock picks, so there's no guarantee that Twist or Trimble will keep rising. Nevertheless, these two companies have attractive businesses and have rewarded shareholders so far. That bodes well for their prospects in the near future as well.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>2 Under-the-Radar Nasdaq Stocks Cathie Wood Loves Right Now</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n2 Under-the-Radar Nasdaq Stocks Cathie Wood Loves Right Now\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-03-24 09:02 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/03/23/2-under-the-radar-nasdaq-stocks-cathie-wood-loves/><strong>fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Nasdaq Compositeis a hotbed of innovation, and the bull market in disruptive stocks in 2020 helped give theNasdaqone of its best years ever. Recently, though, the Nasdaq's rise has taken a bit of a ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/03/23/2-under-the-radar-nasdaq-stocks-cathie-wood-loves/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/03/23/2-under-the-radar-nasdaq-stocks-cathie-wood-loves/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1103096316","content_text":"Nasdaq Compositeis a hotbed of innovation, and the bull market in disruptive stocks in 2020 helped give theNasdaqone of its best years ever. Recently, though, the Nasdaq's rise has taken a bit of a pause.ARK Invest's CEO and chief investment officer, Cathie Wood, has gotten a lot of notoriety for her stock picking prowess over the past year, largely because she's embraced some of the best stocks on the Nasdaq.Teslais the best-known of Wood's top picks, and odds are you already know as much as you want to know about the electric vehicle specialist. However, some other Nasdaq stocks aren't as familiar to ordinary investors even though they have their own opportunities to soar in the years ahead. Below, we'll look at two of the stocks you'll find prominently among ARK Invest exchange-traded fund (ETF) holdings that probably haven't made it onto your radar screen.A play on automationTrimble(NASDAQ:TRMB)isn't a new company, but it has quickly become one of Wood's favorite picks. The stock is the third-largest position in ARK Invest'sAutonomous Technology & Robotics ETF, making up more than $180 million at recent prices. That's not a huge amount by ARK's standards, but it gives the fund manager a 1% stake in Trimble.Founded more than 40 years ago, Trimble's software, hardware, and services are geared toward modeling, data analytics, connectivity, and positioning. Trimble serves a vast array of industries ranging from transportation and utilities to agriculture, construction, and geospacial surveys and mapping.ARK Invest has long been afan of Trimble. In the agricultural space, Trimble's systems have allowed automated farm equipment to use global positioning system navigation to maximize planting, fertilizing, and harvesting efficiency. Trimble will likely play a role in space exploration as well, adding to its optionality.Trimble shares have doubled since last April, but the company has considerable growth potential. There's room for Trimble's stock to keep rising if it can keep capitalizing on opportunities in automation, and with the share price down almost 5% on Tuesday, investors would get a bit of a bargain on Trimble currently.A new Twist on geneticsMeanwhile, ARK Invest has made an even bigger investment in genetics specialistTwist Bioscience(NASDAQ:TWST). The company weighs in at No. 5 among holdings of theARK Genomic Revolution Multi-Sector ETF(NYSEMKT:ARKG), and the nearly $420 million ARK Invest has invested in Twist amounts to about 7% of Twist's outstanding shares. Twist's stock has been extremely volatile lately, having risen as much as eightfold from its lows last year before falling back by about a third since mid-January.Twist's business centers on DNA synthesis, with a cutting-edge genomic sequencing system that can produce viable synthetic genetic material for use in experiments at biotech and biopharmaceutical companies and research institutions. Wood has identified Twist's ability to help clinicians find signals indicating potential cancer as groundbreaking in the field, with the capacity to enable earlier detection and likely save large numbers of lives.At this stage, Twist is going through a pattern that's familiar to high-growth investors. In its most recent quarterly numbers,Twist reported a 64% jump in revenue, with losses narrowing from year-earlier levels. Yet the stock failed to gain ground, leading some to conclude that its recent gains precluded it from benefiting from the good news on the business fundamentals front. Shares are down another 2% on Tuesday afternoon, but that only makes the value proposition that much better for those interested in the genomics stock.Keep your eyes on Wood's buysEven Cathie Wood doesn't bat a thousand with her stock picks, so there's no guarantee that Twist or Trimble will keep rising. Nevertheless, these two companies have attractive businesses and have rewarded shareholders so far. That bodes well for their prospects in the near future as well.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":531,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":353846028,"gmtCreate":1616486197564,"gmtModify":1704794694360,"author":{"id":"3576336077780129","authorId":"3576336077780129","name":"moJoe","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/51b5f1e98cb521c4bd52447b0ea6e905","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3576336077780129","idStr":"3576336077780129"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Im watching..","listText":"Im watching..","text":"Im watching..","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/353846028","repostId":"1108931651","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1108931651","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1616555765,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1108931651?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-03-24 11:16","market":"us","language":"en","title":"These Stocks Are More of a Gamble Than an Investment — and the #1 Is a Reddit Favorite","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1108931651","media":"Barrons","summary":"As with seemingly everything in markets these days, it all ties back to the Reddit Wall Street Bets message board.No, we’re not talking aboutGameStop. Rather, Castor Maritime . The dry-bulk commodities transportation firm was trading around 20 cents earlier this year until it was swept up in momentum as users of the message board recommended the company, sending shares as high as $1.95.The stock was identified as a potential gamble using methodology from recently published research paper—from Al","content":"<p>As with seemingly everything in markets these days, it all ties back to the Reddit Wall Street Bets message board.</p><p>No, we’re not talking aboutGameStop(ticker: GME). Rather, Castor Maritime (CTRM). The dry-bulk commodities transportation firm was trading around 20 cents earlier this year until it was swept up in momentum as users of the message board recommended the company, sending shares as high as $1.95.</p><p>The stock was identified as a potential gamble using methodology from recently published research paper—from Alok Kumar of the University of Miami, Houng Nguyen of the University of Danang, and Talis Putnins at the University of Technology Sydney and Stockholm School of Economics. The group proposed looking at the average volume over 30 days compared to market cap as a way of determining what they called lottery stocks. “We assume that gambling in stock markets involves disproportionate amount of trading in lottery-like stocks,” they said.</p><p>Castor topped the research group’s list of New York Stock Exchange- and Nasdaq-listed companies that were potential “lottery stocks.”<i>Barron’s</i>added to a filter to the list to look at companies with market caps of at least $500 million andpublished the listin January.</p><p>We ran our version of that screen again this month. Castor Maritime topped our list this time.</p><p>Sundial Growers(SNDL), the cannabis stock, andGenius Brands International(GNUS), the children’s media company, appear high on the list too. The top NYSE-listed stock wasAMC Entertainment(AMC), the movie chain operator that, with GameStop, became a poster-child for theso-called meme stock revolution.</p><p>And what about&nbsp;GameStop&nbsp;itself? It’s not in the top 20, but the methodology does put the video-games retailer high: Out of more than 3,000 stocks, GameStop ranks 128th as a lottery stock.</p><p>The stock scoring lowest in the lottery stock rankings was Google owner&nbsp;Alphabet(GOOGL).</p><table><tbody><tr><td>Ranking</td><td>Company</td></tr><tr><td>1.</td><td>Castor Maritime</td></tr><tr><td>2.</td><td>Sundial Growers</td></tr><tr><td>3.</td><td>Genius Brands International</td></tr><tr><td>4.</td><td>TherapeuticsMD</td></tr><tr><td>5.</td><td>Ideanomics</td></tr><tr><td>6.</td><td>AMC Entertainment</td></tr><tr><td>7.</td><td>Ocugen</td></tr><tr><td>8.</td><td>Ebang International Holdings</td></tr><tr><td>9.</td><td>ElectraMeccanica Vehicles</td></tr><tr><td>10.</td><td>Workhorse Group</td></tr><tr><td>11.</td><td>Jiayin Group</td></tr><tr><td>12.</td><td>Invesco Mortgage Capital</td></tr><tr><td>13.</td><td>ChromaDex</td></tr><tr><td>14.</td><td>Transocean</td></tr><tr><td>15.</td><td>Gevo</td></tr><tr><td>16.</td><td>Bionano Genomics</td></tr><tr><td>17.</td><td>Clovis Oncology</td></tr><tr><td>18.</td><td>Nano Dimension</td></tr><tr><td>19.</td><td>W&amp;T Offshore</td></tr><tr><td>20.</td><td>Tellurian</td></tr><tr><td>Source: FactSet</td></tr></tbody></table><p></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>These Stocks Are More of a Gamble Than an Investment — and the #1 Is a Reddit Favorite</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nThese Stocks Are More of a Gamble Than an Investment — and the #1 Is a Reddit Favorite\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-03-24 11:16 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.barrons.com/articles/these-stocks-are-more-of-a-gamble-than-an-investment-and-the-1-is-a-reddit-favorite-51616401800?mod=hp_LEADSUPP_2><strong>Barrons</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>As with seemingly everything in markets these days, it all ties back to the Reddit Wall Street Bets message board.No, we’re not talking aboutGameStop(ticker: GME). Rather, Castor Maritime (CTRM). The ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/these-stocks-are-more-of-a-gamble-than-an-investment-and-the-1-is-a-reddit-favorite-51616401800?mod=hp_LEADSUPP_2\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"RIG":"Transocean Ltd.","GEVO":"Gevo Inc.","CDXC":"Chromadex Corporation","BNGO":"Bionano Genomics","TELL":"Tellurian Inc.","AMC":"AMC院线","TXMD":"TherapeuticsMD Inc.","SNDL":"SNDL Inc.","EBON":"亿邦国际","NNDM":"Nano Dimension Ltd.","WTI":"W&T海底钻探","SOLO":"Electrameccanica Vehicles Corp.","IVR":"景顺抵押资本","CLVS":"Clovis Oncology","JFIN":"嘉银科技","CTRM":"Castor Maritime, Inc."},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/these-stocks-are-more-of-a-gamble-than-an-investment-and-the-1-is-a-reddit-favorite-51616401800?mod=hp_LEADSUPP_2","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1108931651","content_text":"As with seemingly everything in markets these days, it all ties back to the Reddit Wall Street Bets message board.No, we’re not talking aboutGameStop(ticker: GME). Rather, Castor Maritime (CTRM). The dry-bulk commodities transportation firm was trading around 20 cents earlier this year until it was swept up in momentum as users of the message board recommended the company, sending shares as high as $1.95.The stock was identified as a potential gamble using methodology from recently published research paper—from Alok Kumar of the University of Miami, Houng Nguyen of the University of Danang, and Talis Putnins at the University of Technology Sydney and Stockholm School of Economics. The group proposed looking at the average volume over 30 days compared to market cap as a way of determining what they called lottery stocks. “We assume that gambling in stock markets involves disproportionate amount of trading in lottery-like stocks,” they said.Castor topped the research group’s list of New York Stock Exchange- and Nasdaq-listed companies that were potential “lottery stocks.”Barron’sadded to a filter to the list to look at companies with market caps of at least $500 million andpublished the listin January.We ran our version of that screen again this month. Castor Maritime topped our list this time.Sundial Growers(SNDL), the cannabis stock, andGenius Brands International(GNUS), the children’s media company, appear high on the list too. The top NYSE-listed stock wasAMC Entertainment(AMC), the movie chain operator that, with GameStop, became a poster-child for theso-called meme stock revolution.And what about GameStop itself? It’s not in the top 20, but the methodology does put the video-games retailer high: Out of more than 3,000 stocks, GameStop ranks 128th as a lottery stock.The stock scoring lowest in the lottery stock rankings was Google owner Alphabet(GOOGL).RankingCompany1.Castor Maritime2.Sundial Growers3.Genius Brands International4.TherapeuticsMD5.Ideanomics6.AMC Entertainment7.Ocugen8.Ebang International Holdings9.ElectraMeccanica Vehicles10.Workhorse Group11.Jiayin Group12.Invesco Mortgage Capital13.ChromaDex14.Transocean15.Gevo16.Bionano Genomics17.Clovis Oncology18.Nano Dimension19.W&T Offshore20.TellurianSource: FactSet","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":745,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":353051191,"gmtCreate":1616436485913,"gmtModify":1704794141761,"author":{"id":"3576336077780129","authorId":"3576336077780129","name":"moJoe","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/51b5f1e98cb521c4bd52447b0ea6e905","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3576336077780129","idStr":"3576336077780129"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Im listening..","listText":"Im listening..","text":"Im listening..","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/353051191","repostId":"2121141135","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2121141135","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1616405284,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2121141135?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-03-22 17:28","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Before You Buy Sundial Growers, Stop and Consider These 3 Things","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2121141135","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Knowing how to avoid bad pot stocks is just as important as being able to pick out the good ones.","content":"<p>Canadian marijuana company&nbsp;<b>Sundial Growers</b>&nbsp;(NASDAQ:SNDL) has been incredibly popular among the WallStreetBets subreddit. After all, who doesn't love an underdog with ambitions of taking the weed market by storm? Unfortunately, not every big dream manifests into reality, and that couldn't be truer for Sundial stock.&nbsp;</p>\n<p>For <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE\">one</a> thing, the stock price has doubled over the past year, but that's actually behind the curve -- the average weed stock saw a magnificent 171% gain during the same period. However, that's not the main problem. Let's take a look at why white-hot Sundial shares could seriously burn investors who buy now.&nbsp;</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1d514111118071afd2a07f8ebf2fc6b1\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\"><span>Image source: Getty Images.</span></p>\n<h2>1. Its valuation&nbsp;</h2>\n<p>In 2020, Sundial revenue fell by 4% year over year to 60.9 million Canadian dollars. Gains in vape cartridge sales were tempered by declining dried flower and oil revenue, as well as falling cannabis prices across all of its products. Overall revenue was down even though the company produced 36% more dried cannabis (a total of 23,500 kilograms) than in 2019.&nbsp;</p>\n<p>What's astonishing is that Sundial stock is trading for 43.6 times sales. Its fellow Canadian cannabis growers such as <b>Aphria</b> (NASDAQ:APHA) are selling for much less than that (about 12 times sales). Aphria is also growing its revenue by about 34% per year and managed to break even in its latest quarter. Meanwhile, Sundial's losses are mounting. Speaking of which ...&nbsp;</p>\n<h2>2. Its mounting losses</h2>\n<p>Last year, the company posted a gross loss of CA$115.8 million. It saw a record amount of obsolete inventory and asset impairment as the Canadian marijuana market became hypercompetitive. The ever-expanding number of legal producers, a plethora of mom-and-dad pot growers, and the resilient black market have all combined in anything but a favorable way for Sundial. Its operating loss increased to CA$206.3 million from CA$142.7 million in 2019.&nbsp;</p>\n<p>Buying shares of a company that is losing several dollars for every dollar it earns in revenue is probably not a good idea. Sundial inexplicably is still seeing investor demand for its shares in the market, but that may change very soon.&nbsp;</p>\n<h2>3. Its capital management</h2>\n<p>Amazingly, Sundial has no debt whatsoever and about CA$719 million in cash. That money didn't come from operations, however, but from the issuance of stock. Between July 2020 and today, Sundial's number of shares outstanding shot up from less than 200 million to a stunning 1.665 billion.</p>\n<p>Since Sundial is operating at a nine-figure net loss, I would expect its newly infused capital to dissipate significantly over time. What's worse, the pot grower has a less than 4% market share in Canada with no international presence whatsoever. It will take a great deal of time and effort for Sundial to both trim its losses and expand abroad. I would not be surprised if it goes back to the capital markets to ask investors for more.&nbsp;</p>\n<h2>What's the verdict?&nbsp;</h2>\n<p>Given the pot grower's absurd valuation despite abysmal results, accelerating operating loss, and exuberant share dilution, Sundial Growers is definitely not a company that looks out for shareholders' best interest. Investors looking for marijuana stocks should understand that much better alternatives exist than what Sundial has to offer.&nbsp;</p>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Before You Buy Sundial Growers, Stop and Consider These 3 Things</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBefore You Buy Sundial Growers, Stop and Consider These 3 Things\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-03-22 17:28 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/03/21/before-you-buy-sundial-growers-stop-and-consider-t/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Canadian marijuana company Sundial Growers (NASDAQ:SNDL) has been incredibly popular among the WallStreetBets subreddit. After all, who doesn't love an underdog with ambitions of taking the weed ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/03/21/before-you-buy-sundial-growers-stop-and-consider-t/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SNDL":"SNDL Inc."},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/03/21/before-you-buy-sundial-growers-stop-and-consider-t/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2121141135","content_text":"Canadian marijuana company Sundial Growers (NASDAQ:SNDL) has been incredibly popular among the WallStreetBets subreddit. After all, who doesn't love an underdog with ambitions of taking the weed market by storm? Unfortunately, not every big dream manifests into reality, and that couldn't be truer for Sundial stock. \nFor one thing, the stock price has doubled over the past year, but that's actually behind the curve -- the average weed stock saw a magnificent 171% gain during the same period. However, that's not the main problem. Let's take a look at why white-hot Sundial shares could seriously burn investors who buy now. \nImage source: Getty Images.\n1. Its valuation \nIn 2020, Sundial revenue fell by 4% year over year to 60.9 million Canadian dollars. Gains in vape cartridge sales were tempered by declining dried flower and oil revenue, as well as falling cannabis prices across all of its products. Overall revenue was down even though the company produced 36% more dried cannabis (a total of 23,500 kilograms) than in 2019. \nWhat's astonishing is that Sundial stock is trading for 43.6 times sales. Its fellow Canadian cannabis growers such as Aphria (NASDAQ:APHA) are selling for much less than that (about 12 times sales). Aphria is also growing its revenue by about 34% per year and managed to break even in its latest quarter. Meanwhile, Sundial's losses are mounting. Speaking of which ... \n2. Its mounting losses\nLast year, the company posted a gross loss of CA$115.8 million. It saw a record amount of obsolete inventory and asset impairment as the Canadian marijuana market became hypercompetitive. The ever-expanding number of legal producers, a plethora of mom-and-dad pot growers, and the resilient black market have all combined in anything but a favorable way for Sundial. Its operating loss increased to CA$206.3 million from CA$142.7 million in 2019. \nBuying shares of a company that is losing several dollars for every dollar it earns in revenue is probably not a good idea. Sundial inexplicably is still seeing investor demand for its shares in the market, but that may change very soon. \n3. Its capital management\nAmazingly, Sundial has no debt whatsoever and about CA$719 million in cash. That money didn't come from operations, however, but from the issuance of stock. Between July 2020 and today, Sundial's number of shares outstanding shot up from less than 200 million to a stunning 1.665 billion.\nSince Sundial is operating at a nine-figure net loss, I would expect its newly infused capital to dissipate significantly over time. What's worse, the pot grower has a less than 4% market share in Canada with no international presence whatsoever. It will take a great deal of time and effort for Sundial to both trim its losses and expand abroad. I would not be surprised if it goes back to the capital markets to ask investors for more. \nWhat's the verdict? \nGiven the pot grower's absurd valuation despite abysmal results, accelerating operating loss, and exuberant share dilution, Sundial Growers is definitely not a company that looks out for shareholders' best interest. Investors looking for marijuana stocks should understand that much better alternatives exist than what Sundial has to offer.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":758,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":353053430,"gmtCreate":1616436375220,"gmtModify":1704794141435,"author":{"id":"3576336077780129","authorId":"3576336077780129","name":"moJoe","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/51b5f1e98cb521c4bd52447b0ea6e905","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3576336077780129","idStr":"3576336077780129"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/EXPR\">$Express,(EXPR)$</a>easy does it.","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/EXPR\">$Express,(EXPR)$</a>easy does it.","text":"$Express,(EXPR)$easy does it.","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/eb327344468b82a0e2dcab3b722289c0","width":"1080","height":"1920"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/353053430","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":562,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":350922823,"gmtCreate":1616152406162,"gmtModify":1704791588046,"author":{"id":"3576336077780129","authorId":"3576336077780129","name":"moJoe","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/51b5f1e98cb521c4bd52447b0ea6e905","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3576336077780129","idStr":"3576336077780129"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Get out now..keep on the look out.","listText":"Get out now..keep on the look out.","text":"Get out now..keep on the look out.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/350922823","repostId":"1137663173","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":323,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":327922246,"gmtCreate":1616052934185,"gmtModify":1704790246526,"author":{"id":"3576336077780129","authorId":"3576336077780129","name":"moJoe","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/51b5f1e98cb521c4bd52447b0ea6e905","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3576336077780129","idStr":"3576336077780129"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Nice gains..","listText":"Nice gains..","text":"Nice gains..","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/327922246","repostId":"1138187457","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":471,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":327922184,"gmtCreate":1616052905248,"gmtModify":1704790247017,"author":{"id":"3576336077780129","authorId":"3576336077780129","name":"moJoe","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/51b5f1e98cb521c4bd52447b0ea6e905","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3576336077780129","idStr":"3576336077780129"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"You beauty...","listText":"You beauty...","text":"You beauty...","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/327922184","repostId":"1138187457","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":230,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":327967582,"gmtCreate":1616052271646,"gmtModify":1704790237094,"author":{"id":"3576336077780129","authorId":"3576336077780129","name":"moJoe","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/51b5f1e98cb521c4bd52447b0ea6e905","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3576336077780129","idStr":"3576336077780129"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Genius.","listText":"Genius.","text":"Genius.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/327967582","repostId":"1144305771","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":417,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":324252856,"gmtCreate":1615997420775,"gmtModify":1704789593803,"author":{"id":"3576336077780129","authorId":"3576336077780129","name":"moJoe","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/51b5f1e98cb521c4bd52447b0ea6e905","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3576336077780129","idStr":"3576336077780129"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Keep it up..","listText":"Keep it up..","text":"Keep it up..","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/324252856","repostId":"1179979737","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1179979737","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1615996440,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1179979737?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-03-17 23:54","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Olo opens for trading at $31.82 up 27% from IPO price","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1179979737","media":"marketwatch","summary":"(March 17) Olo opens for trading at $31.82 up 27% from IPO price.Olo Inc., which makes online-orderi","content":"<p>(March 17)&nbsp;Olo opens for trading at $31.82 up 27% from IPO price.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/20d1f9f9ba6dea497eb21c0f36654a28\" tg-width=\"662\" tg-height=\"438\"></p><p>Olo Inc., which makes online-ordering technology for restaurants, is set to go public Wednesday as it seeks to benefit from an on-demand boom that was helped further along by the coronavirus pandemic.</p><p>The New York-based company priced its initial public offering at $25 a share late Tuesday, much higher than its original target of $16 to $18 a share, which it raised to $20 to $22 a share Monday. It is offering 18 million shares and could raise up to $450 million at a valuation of $3.6 billion.</p><p>The company’s stock will list on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol OLO, .</p><p>Olo, which was founded in 2005 and is short for “online ordering,” powers 1.8 million orders a day for well-known restaurant chains such as Denny’s, the Cheesecake Factory, Shake Shack and more, as well as Peet’s Coffee, Jamba Juice and others. The company’s revenue surged 94% in 2020 year over year, it said in a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.</p><p>“As consumers have become accustomed to the immediate convenience of on-demand commerce, they are demanding the same digital experience from restaurants, placing significant pressure on restaurants to deploy solutions,” Olo said. “This demand has only accelerated since the onset of COVID-19, as on-demand commerce has become a necessity for the majority of restaurants.”</p><p>Olo said that as of Dec. 31, it had about 400 brand partners and its technology — which includes digital ordering and enabling delivery — was being used at more than 64,000 locations.</p><p>The company reported net income of $3.1 million on revenue of $98.4 million last year, compared with a net loss of $8.3 million on revenue of $50.7 million in 2019.</p><p>Olo raised less than $100 million since its inception, it said, including from investors such as The Raine Group, Tiger Global Management and RRE Ventures.</p><p>The IPO will be led by Goldman Sachs and J.P. Morgan, two of eight underwriters listed in the filing.</p>","source":"market_watch","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Olo opens for trading at $31.82 up 27% from IPO price</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nOlo opens for trading at $31.82 up 27% from IPO price\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-03-17 23:54 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.marketwatch.com/story/olo-maker-of-restaurant-ordering-tech-prices-ipo-at-25-a-share-for-valuation-above-3-billion-11615945340?siteid=yhoof2><strong>marketwatch</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>(March 17) Olo opens for trading at $31.82 up 27% from IPO price.Olo Inc., which makes online-ordering technology for restaurants, is set to go public Wednesday as it seeks to benefit from an on-...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/olo-maker-of-restaurant-ordering-tech-prices-ipo-at-25-a-share-for-valuation-above-3-billion-11615945340?siteid=yhoof2\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"OLO":"PowerShares DB Crude Oil Long ET"},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/olo-maker-of-restaurant-ordering-tech-prices-ipo-at-25-a-share-for-valuation-above-3-billion-11615945340?siteid=yhoof2","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/599a65733b8245fcf7868668ef9ad712","article_id":"1179979737","content_text":"(March 17) Olo opens for trading at $31.82 up 27% from IPO price.Olo Inc., which makes online-ordering technology for restaurants, is set to go public Wednesday as it seeks to benefit from an on-demand boom that was helped further along by the coronavirus pandemic.The New York-based company priced its initial public offering at $25 a share late Tuesday, much higher than its original target of $16 to $18 a share, which it raised to $20 to $22 a share Monday. It is offering 18 million shares and could raise up to $450 million at a valuation of $3.6 billion.The company’s stock will list on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol OLO, .Olo, which was founded in 2005 and is short for “online ordering,” powers 1.8 million orders a day for well-known restaurant chains such as Denny’s, the Cheesecake Factory, Shake Shack and more, as well as Peet’s Coffee, Jamba Juice and others. The company’s revenue surged 94% in 2020 year over year, it said in a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.“As consumers have become accustomed to the immediate convenience of on-demand commerce, they are demanding the same digital experience from restaurants, placing significant pressure on restaurants to deploy solutions,” Olo said. “This demand has only accelerated since the onset of COVID-19, as on-demand commerce has become a necessity for the majority of restaurants.”Olo said that as of Dec. 31, it had about 400 brand partners and its technology — which includes digital ordering and enabling delivery — was being used at more than 64,000 locations.The company reported net income of $3.1 million on revenue of $98.4 million last year, compared with a net loss of $8.3 million on revenue of $50.7 million in 2019.Olo raised less than $100 million since its inception, it said, including from investors such as The Raine Group, Tiger Global Management and RRE Ventures.The IPO will be led by Goldman Sachs and J.P. Morgan, two of eight underwriters listed in the filing.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":436,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":325481909,"gmtCreate":1615913004401,"gmtModify":1704788466041,"author":{"id":"3576336077780129","authorId":"3576336077780129","name":"moJoe","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/51b5f1e98cb521c4bd52447b0ea6e905","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3576336077780129","idStr":"3576336077780129"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Steady as she go..","listText":"Steady as she go..","text":"Steady as she go..","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f678d5859d2aca8d75278a99a5db6d3e","width":"1080","height":"2261"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/325481909","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":384,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":325483619,"gmtCreate":1615912937931,"gmtModify":1704788465226,"author":{"id":"3576336077780129","authorId":"3576336077780129","name":"moJoe","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/51b5f1e98cb521c4bd52447b0ea6e905","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3576336077780129","idStr":"3576336077780129"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hmmmm.","listText":"Hmmmm.","text":"Hmmmm.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/325483619","repostId":"1121564086","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1121564086","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1615899026,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1121564086?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-03-16 20:50","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Larry McDonald Warns \"The Big [Market] Quake Is Coming\"","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1121564086","media":"zerohedge","summary":"The mood is testy. Yields on Treasuries are rising, the dollar is trending stronger, and major tech ","content":"<p>The mood is testy. Yields on Treasuries are rising, the dollar is trending stronger, and major tech stocks are under pressure. Accordingly, tensions are high when the Federal Reserve decides on the future course of its monetary policy this Wednesday.</p>\n<p><i><b>«The Fed has its back against the wall,»</b></i>says Larry McDonald during a conversation via Zoom. The internationally renowned macro strategist and former senior trader at Lehman Brothers warns that the Federal Reserve has little time to mitigate the explosive situation in the bond and currency markets. Otherwise, he says, the global economy is at risk of another crisis.</p>\n<p>Since last spring, the founder of the independent investment advisor&nbsp;The Bear Traps Report&nbsp;has been&nbsp;recommending investments&nbsp;in the commodity sector, where he believes a new super cycle has begun. He&nbsp;reiterated his recommendation&nbsp;during his last conversation with The Market in late 2020. Today, his call for a big reflation trade has become the consensus on Wall Street.</p>\n<p>In this new interview with The Market/NZZ, which has been edited and condensed for clarity, Larry McDonald tells why he expects the Federal Reserve to resort to yield curve control fairly soon and what that will mean for gold and silver. He also explains why the rotation into commodities and value stocks is only just beginning and where he currently sees the best opportunities for investments.</p>\n<p><b>After the turmoil of the past few weeks, all eyes are on the Federal Reserve. What can investors expect from Wednesday's Fed meeting?</b></p>\n<blockquote>\n <b>We’re at a point where the market is moving way ahead of the Federal Reserve.</b>The Fed is on «outcome-based guidance», but the beast, that serpent in the market, wants more than that. Basically, the market is saying: «The US economy is going to grow 6 or 7% this year, and that will force you to taper in Q3 or Q4.» As investors are pricing in a tapering of the Fed’s asset purchases, financial conditions are tightening; especially in emerging markets, where spreads on credit default swaps are rising. So far, financial conditions are nowhere near extremely dangerous levels. But the problem is everybody thinks we’re in a similar situation as back in 2018.\n</blockquote>\n<p><b>What do you mean by that?</b></p>\n<blockquote>\n Once again, the Fed is playing «Tough Guy»: The market demands a policy pivot, but the Fed is trying to hold on to its path, essentially signaling to investors: «No way, relax». We had a similar set-up in 2013, 2016 and 2018. These were the three most significant monetary policy shifts where market pressures broke the Fed's desired policy path.\n <b>The problem is that back then the Fed had far more rope to play Tough Guy since the economy was stronger. In 2018 for instance</b>, the US economy was creating hundreds of thousands of jobs a month. In contrast, today’s employment-to-population ratio is 3.5 percentage points below January 2020 levels. This means 13 million Americans are outside the labor force. To get back to pre-pandemic levels, the economy has to create more than 540,000 jobs a month for two years.\n</blockquote>\n<p><b>So what does this mean for this week's Fed meeting?</b></p>\n<blockquote>\n <b>The Fed is planet earth’s central bank. Every time they tried to play Tough Guy, they’ve blown up the global economy.</b>This time, the Fed's Tough Guy window is much smaller. In 2018 or 2013 that window was nine to ten months. Now, it’s like two months because the economy is so weak. If they let financial conditions tighten further, they risk a major default cycle.\n <b>The negative multiplier effect of a stronger dollar is much higher to the world economy than the Fed anticipates</b>. They can't afford to let the dollar rip higher, because there is so much dollar denominated debt in the world, so much trade tied to the Greenback. If they blow that up, it will just blow back to the US and force the Fed into a policy shift anyway. It’s like with an oil change at the car repair shop: You can pay now or you can pay later. That’s why the Fed has to pay now.\n</blockquote>\n<p><b>Why?</b></p>\n<blockquote>\n <b>The Fed’s back is against the wall, all points to proactive action on March 17.</b>They must suppress taper fears and cut these risks off, or else they blow up the global economy for the 4th time since 2013. We’re hearing that they’re already getting incoming calls from emerging market central banks right now. If Fed Chairman Jay Powell plays Tough Guy by staying with the current path, without offering further assurances of deeper, more sustainable accommodation, the beast inside the market will keep pushing him until he breaks. We will see a repeat of Q4 2018 and Q1 2019, where the Fed was forced into an utterly embarrassing pivot. One of those is enough for Powell’s legacy, he doesn’t want two.\n</blockquote>\n<p><b>What kind of measures can be expected?</b></p>\n<blockquote>\n <b>Eventually, we will get the taper, but the overwhelming point is other weapons have to come first.</b>A Federal Reserve offering insufficient accommodation places markets in the crosshairs of a risk-off event. The first thing they will try to do is give some hard data points. For example, the US economy has to create 10 million jobs for the Fed to do anything on the balance sheet. Another way they can get out is calendar guidance, but that’s a more sophisticated weaponry. Bottom line, they should just say: «From now until the end of the year QE will continue at $120 billion a month, and we want PCE-inflation to get to between 2 and 2.5% and stay there for 24 months.» With that in place,\n <b>all they have to do is open the door two or three inches for yield curve control, and they can contain the dollar.</b>\n</blockquote>\n<p><b>The last time the Federal Reserve used yield curve control was during the time of World War II. Why would it resort to such a radical measure?</b></p>\n<blockquote>\n <b>Here’s the dirty little secret: Too many Treasury bonds are for sale.</b>There aren’t enough buyers, and that will force the Fed to step in. More than $3.6 trillion of US government paper was issued in 2020 versus $2.9 trillion in the prior year. With the new $1.9 trillion fiscal package coming from Washington, issuance in 2021 is slated to rise to $4 trillion. That’s a lot more than the Fed’s Treasury purchases through QE, so the spread between QE and debt issuance gets much wider. Washington is doing so much fiscal stimulus, I’m confident that this is going to force the Fed into yield curve control by September. If that’s the case, it will pressure the dollar lower and put commodities, value stocks, global cyclicals, materials and emerging markets into rotation overdrive.\n</blockquote>\n<p><b>How come?</b></p>\n<blockquote>\n <b>Yield curve control deployment is the tactical nuclear weaponry.</b>If the Fed throws out yield curve control just as a threat, it will suppress Treasury rates and real yields will go much more negative. Over the last couple of months, the issuance has overpowered inflation expectations. Think of it as a car race: Treasury issuances were driving up yields faster than inflation expectations rose. But if the Fed starts to acknowledge that they are going to bring out new weapons like calendar guidance and yield curve control, then they’re suppressing nominal yields. So if inflation expectations continue to rise, then real yields go big negative – and that’s when gold and silver will take off. I think silver can double from here until early next year. Gold could be up 50%.\n</blockquote>\n<p><b>How can investors best position themselves in this environment?</b></p>\n<blockquote>\n In terms of emerging markets, we’re\n <b>long Chile and Brazil.</b>In Asia, South Korea looks attractive. We also like the KWEB ETF which consists of the big Chinese tech stocks. In the commodity space, we have a position in the XME ETF which owns mainly\n <b>copper and steel names.</b>One of the best companies we own is Teck Resources. This stock is almost like a commodity mutual fund, because the company has exposure to copper, nickel and even energy. Another favorite is Mosaic because in a commodity cycle where you have weather problems around the world,\n <b>agricultural plays are a good bet.</b>\n</blockquote>\n<p><b>What about precious metals?</b></p>\n<blockquote>\n <b>When it comes to precious metals, we love silver miners</b>like Hecla Mining. When the Fed eases its policy, the silver miners will outperform the underlying metal, and they will outperform gold because there is more leverage there.\n</blockquote>\n<p><b>The gold price is down more than 15% since its all-time high in August. What’s the problem?</b></p>\n<blockquote>\n <b>Everyone thinks it’s 2013, so taper fears are sky high for gold. But the Fed cannot repeat its mistakes.</b>They must cap yields if they want to preserve the global economic recovery. Thus, the convexity with gold is very attractive. Every leg lower in real yields will act like a slingshot higher for gold. That’s why we love Newmont. The stock trades at 6x EBITDA with a 4% dividend yield which gives you some downside protection. And remember: The 2011-2016 commodity bust has made the balance sheet of these high quality gold mining companies a lot stronger.\n</blockquote>\n<p><b>President Joe Biden has just signed off on a $1.9 trillion economic program. What are the chances of a second stimulus bill, aimed at infrastructure?</b></p>\n<blockquote>\n It’s important to note that\n <b>a second fiscal deal for 2021 is not a slam dunk.</b>To pass the present $1.9 trillion stimulus bill, the Democrats used reconciliation. It’s a very special trick in US politics, because with reconciliation you don’t need 60 votes to pass a bill in the Senate. All you need is 50 votes. Yet, reconciliation has to be tied to a budget year. This means the next time the Democrats can use it is probably in the fourth quarter, late November or December, and tie it to the following year's budget. So the only way to do an infrastructure bill in the next six months is with a traditional piece of legislation.\n</blockquote>\n<p><b>Is that even possible, given how wide the rift between Republicans and Democrats has opened in recent years?</b></p>\n<blockquote>\n For that you need essentially ten Republicans. Right now, the centrists on the Hill, people like Mitt Romney on the Republican side or Joe Manchin on the Democrat side, are the most powerful people in Washington. They want to do an infrastructure program, but they want to finance it with tax revenue. They don’t believe in things like Modern Monetary Theory where the Fed is financing the deficit.\n <b>So you are going to need a tax hike. And in this regard, we’re hearing they could go after some type of flat tax on the FAANGs, the big technology companies.</b>\n</blockquote>\n<p><b>What does this mean for Apple, Google, Facebook and other tech heavyweights?</b></p>\n<blockquote>\n Keep in mind, we’re in a populist revolution:\n <b>The risk of inequality leading to social unrest is high, and that puts pressure on politicians to pass bills to tax the rich.</b>But a wealth tax is extremely complicated, it would take years. The simplest way to do something in terms of taxes is to tax larger companies. In the eighties, the top 100 companies in the US maintained about 45 to 50% of total profits. Today, the largest 20 companies command about 85 to 90%. In addition to that, close to 40% of the S&amp;P 500’s market cap is related to tech. So tech is the low hanging fruit for the populists in Congress to go after.\n</blockquote>\n<p><b>One more reason why tech stocks remain under pressure?</b></p>\n<blockquote>\n We run a bunch of models. For example, we look at Berkshire Hathaway’s share price versus the Nasdaq 100 or the Dow Jones Industrial versus the Nasdaq. March 8th was the second time in 2021 that the Nasdaq closed down 2% with the Dow closing higher.\n <b>We haven’t seen this type of data since the dotcom crash. It’s a very rare event which historically coincides with a longer-term rotation out of technology stocks. That’s a very encouraging signal for value stocks.</b>In this regard, we like the EWU ETF. It’s a wonderful basket of stocks because it’s full of financials and world class names like BP, Rio Tinto or Glencore. Officially, it’s called the United Kingdom ETF, but it’s more like a global value ETF.\n</blockquote>\n<p><b>Does this mean that the rotation towards cyclical stocks has only just begun?</b></p>\n<blockquote>\n <b>Many investors around the world are long a portfolio of stocks that was designed for the deflationary environment of the previous decade.</b>The decade ahead of us - with all what’s ahead in terms of fiscal and monetary stimulus, populism, regulation and taxes - will push investors toward more globally value related stocks. That’s where the best returns are going to be.\n</blockquote>\n<p><b>So the previously successful «buy the dip» strategy of simply buying more tech stocks after every decline no longer works?</b></p>\n<blockquote>\n <b>The potency of dip-buying is in decay mode.</b>Global value is really starting to kick tech in the teeth, and when that happens, it wakes up what's called «real money». Keep in mind: There is fast money, mostly hedge funds which are nimble and make quick moves. In contrast, real money moves slowly. Those types of investors don’t make asset allocation decisions quickly. They base their decisions on committees and all kinds of meetings. As a result, tectonic plates are shifting beneath our feet. We’ve seen tremors after tremors where value is starting to crush growth, and now the earthquake is coming. At Bear Traps, we have a Bloomberg chat with 650 institutional investors, and I can tell just by these conversations, that the real money is starting to move.\n <b>And when the real money moves, that’s when the big quake happens.</b>\n</blockquote>\n<p><b>What kind of dislocations will this cause?</b></p>\n<blockquote>\n <b>Tech will probably be down 30 to 40% sometime between now and the end of October.</b>Today, the market cap of the Nasdaq 100 is close to $12 trillion, but most large-cap tech stocks are unchanged since July last year, while commodity and value-related equities are up 20 to 50%. In the US, if you talk to a hundred high-net-worth families, every one of those families owns Apple, Google, Facebook and Amazon. But look what’s happening: Amazon’s stock is flat since the 4th of July 2020. That's $1.5 trillion of dead money. Last Friday, Amazon failed at the 200-day moving average again.\n <b>This is like Mike Tyson getting defeated by Buster Douglas, one of the greatest upsets in sports history. This psychology is moving through the market, pushing the capital migration process into value and commodity plays.</b>\n</blockquote>\n<p><b>However, investments in commodities are mostly not compliant with the trend towards ESG standards; especially when it comes to CO2 emissions.</b></p>\n<blockquote>\n <b>The best ESG trade on the board is nuclear power. The largest uranium company in the US is Cameco with a $7 market cap.</b>Think about that relative to Elon Musk’s net worth! I support the Green New Deal, but this needs time, because solar and wind are still too far away to produce the amount of energy needed around the world, especially in India and China. The only way to meet that demand is through nuclear power. Uranium is coming out of a ten-year bear market, and it’s going into a massive new bull market. All the contracts between power plants and uranium producers are going to be adjusted. That’s why we like the URA ETF which owns companies like Cameco. I see some of these companies as six baggers: 500% upside potential and 30 to 40% downside risk, because uranium is still a risky commodity.\n</blockquote>\n<p><b>In our&nbsp;last conversation, you recommended investments in the energy sector. Since then, names such as Chevron, Royal Dutch Shell or Exxon Mobil have advanced 25 to 60%. What do you advise investors to do now?</b></p>\n<blockquote>\n <b>For now, we’ve cut our energy book:</b>We’ve sold half of our shares in Chevron, and we’ve sold two thirds of our positions in Exxon Mobil and in the XLE ETF. What happens when you get into the fourth, fifth and sixth innings of a commodity cycle, tertiary sectors like metallurgical coal become more attractive. Sure, met coal, also known as coking coal, is not ESG friendly, but there is no way around it for steel production and hence the construction of skyscrapers, bridges and things like that. So coming into this infrastructure boom all around the world, coal has plenty of upside. That’s why we own names like Arch Resources and Peabody Energy. They’re low-leveraged, and really cheap, once again, on a risk/reward basis.\n</blockquote>\n<p><b>What are the biggest dangers to watch out for in the coming weeks and months?</b></p>\n<blockquote>\n <b>One spot to watch are all these forbearance deals in commercial real estate.</b>When we come out of Covid and the vaccines and the stimulus money are juicing through the economy, the market will be forcing the release of the forbearance on a lot of these loans. So if people don’t come back fast enough to the cities, these commercial real estate loans are going to get reset. This would mean some big defaults, and the banks own a lot of these loans. Also, a lot of leveraged loans are really rich. And then, there is potentially a fiscal cliff:\n <b>The sustainability of the $1.9 trillion stimulus package isn’t that great because a lot of it is just transfer payments replacing lost income for people staying at home. That’s why the US needs a second stimulus bill. If we don’t get a second bill, we are going to have a problem in about a year from now.</b>\n</blockquote>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Larry McDonald Warns \"The Big [Market] Quake Is Coming\"</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nLarry McDonald Warns \"The Big [Market] Quake Is Coming\"\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-03-16 20:50 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/larry-mcdonald-warns-big-market-quake-coming><strong>zerohedge</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The mood is testy. Yields on Treasuries are rising, the dollar is trending stronger, and major tech stocks are under pressure. Accordingly, tensions are high when the Federal Reserve decides on the ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/larry-mcdonald-warns-big-market-quake-coming\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯","SPY":"标普500ETF",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/larry-mcdonald-warns-big-market-quake-coming","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1121564086","content_text":"The mood is testy. Yields on Treasuries are rising, the dollar is trending stronger, and major tech stocks are under pressure. Accordingly, tensions are high when the Federal Reserve decides on the future course of its monetary policy this Wednesday.\n«The Fed has its back against the wall,»says Larry McDonald during a conversation via Zoom. The internationally renowned macro strategist and former senior trader at Lehman Brothers warns that the Federal Reserve has little time to mitigate the explosive situation in the bond and currency markets. Otherwise, he says, the global economy is at risk of another crisis.\nSince last spring, the founder of the independent investment advisor The Bear Traps Report has been recommending investments in the commodity sector, where he believes a new super cycle has begun. He reiterated his recommendation during his last conversation with The Market in late 2020. Today, his call for a big reflation trade has become the consensus on Wall Street.\nIn this new interview with The Market/NZZ, which has been edited and condensed for clarity, Larry McDonald tells why he expects the Federal Reserve to resort to yield curve control fairly soon and what that will mean for gold and silver. He also explains why the rotation into commodities and value stocks is only just beginning and where he currently sees the best opportunities for investments.\nAfter the turmoil of the past few weeks, all eyes are on the Federal Reserve. What can investors expect from Wednesday's Fed meeting?\n\nWe’re at a point where the market is moving way ahead of the Federal Reserve.The Fed is on «outcome-based guidance», but the beast, that serpent in the market, wants more than that. Basically, the market is saying: «The US economy is going to grow 6 or 7% this year, and that will force you to taper in Q3 or Q4.» As investors are pricing in a tapering of the Fed’s asset purchases, financial conditions are tightening; especially in emerging markets, where spreads on credit default swaps are rising. So far, financial conditions are nowhere near extremely dangerous levels. But the problem is everybody thinks we’re in a similar situation as back in 2018.\n\nWhat do you mean by that?\n\n Once again, the Fed is playing «Tough Guy»: The market demands a policy pivot, but the Fed is trying to hold on to its path, essentially signaling to investors: «No way, relax». We had a similar set-up in 2013, 2016 and 2018. These were the three most significant monetary policy shifts where market pressures broke the Fed's desired policy path.\n The problem is that back then the Fed had far more rope to play Tough Guy since the economy was stronger. In 2018 for instance, the US economy was creating hundreds of thousands of jobs a month. In contrast, today’s employment-to-population ratio is 3.5 percentage points below January 2020 levels. This means 13 million Americans are outside the labor force. To get back to pre-pandemic levels, the economy has to create more than 540,000 jobs a month for two years.\n\nSo what does this mean for this week's Fed meeting?\n\nThe Fed is planet earth’s central bank. Every time they tried to play Tough Guy, they’ve blown up the global economy.This time, the Fed's Tough Guy window is much smaller. In 2018 or 2013 that window was nine to ten months. Now, it’s like two months because the economy is so weak. If they let financial conditions tighten further, they risk a major default cycle.\n The negative multiplier effect of a stronger dollar is much higher to the world economy than the Fed anticipates. They can't afford to let the dollar rip higher, because there is so much dollar denominated debt in the world, so much trade tied to the Greenback. If they blow that up, it will just blow back to the US and force the Fed into a policy shift anyway. It’s like with an oil change at the car repair shop: You can pay now or you can pay later. That’s why the Fed has to pay now.\n\nWhy?\n\nThe Fed’s back is against the wall, all points to proactive action on March 17.They must suppress taper fears and cut these risks off, or else they blow up the global economy for the 4th time since 2013. We’re hearing that they’re already getting incoming calls from emerging market central banks right now. If Fed Chairman Jay Powell plays Tough Guy by staying with the current path, without offering further assurances of deeper, more sustainable accommodation, the beast inside the market will keep pushing him until he breaks. We will see a repeat of Q4 2018 and Q1 2019, where the Fed was forced into an utterly embarrassing pivot. One of those is enough for Powell’s legacy, he doesn’t want two.\n\nWhat kind of measures can be expected?\n\nEventually, we will get the taper, but the overwhelming point is other weapons have to come first.A Federal Reserve offering insufficient accommodation places markets in the crosshairs of a risk-off event. The first thing they will try to do is give some hard data points. For example, the US economy has to create 10 million jobs for the Fed to do anything on the balance sheet. Another way they can get out is calendar guidance, but that’s a more sophisticated weaponry. Bottom line, they should just say: «From now until the end of the year QE will continue at $120 billion a month, and we want PCE-inflation to get to between 2 and 2.5% and stay there for 24 months.» With that in place,\n all they have to do is open the door two or three inches for yield curve control, and they can contain the dollar.\n\nThe last time the Federal Reserve used yield curve control was during the time of World War II. Why would it resort to such a radical measure?\n\nHere’s the dirty little secret: Too many Treasury bonds are for sale.There aren’t enough buyers, and that will force the Fed to step in. More than $3.6 trillion of US government paper was issued in 2020 versus $2.9 trillion in the prior year. With the new $1.9 trillion fiscal package coming from Washington, issuance in 2021 is slated to rise to $4 trillion. That’s a lot more than the Fed’s Treasury purchases through QE, so the spread between QE and debt issuance gets much wider. Washington is doing so much fiscal stimulus, I’m confident that this is going to force the Fed into yield curve control by September. If that’s the case, it will pressure the dollar lower and put commodities, value stocks, global cyclicals, materials and emerging markets into rotation overdrive.\n\nHow come?\n\nYield curve control deployment is the tactical nuclear weaponry.If the Fed throws out yield curve control just as a threat, it will suppress Treasury rates and real yields will go much more negative. Over the last couple of months, the issuance has overpowered inflation expectations. Think of it as a car race: Treasury issuances were driving up yields faster than inflation expectations rose. But if the Fed starts to acknowledge that they are going to bring out new weapons like calendar guidance and yield curve control, then they’re suppressing nominal yields. So if inflation expectations continue to rise, then real yields go big negative – and that’s when gold and silver will take off. I think silver can double from here until early next year. Gold could be up 50%.\n\nHow can investors best position themselves in this environment?\n\n In terms of emerging markets, we’re\n long Chile and Brazil.In Asia, South Korea looks attractive. We also like the KWEB ETF which consists of the big Chinese tech stocks. In the commodity space, we have a position in the XME ETF which owns mainly\n copper and steel names.One of the best companies we own is Teck Resources. This stock is almost like a commodity mutual fund, because the company has exposure to copper, nickel and even energy. Another favorite is Mosaic because in a commodity cycle where you have weather problems around the world,\n agricultural plays are a good bet.\n\nWhat about precious metals?\n\nWhen it comes to precious metals, we love silver minerslike Hecla Mining. When the Fed eases its policy, the silver miners will outperform the underlying metal, and they will outperform gold because there is more leverage there.\n\nThe gold price is down more than 15% since its all-time high in August. What’s the problem?\n\nEveryone thinks it’s 2013, so taper fears are sky high for gold. But the Fed cannot repeat its mistakes.They must cap yields if they want to preserve the global economic recovery. Thus, the convexity with gold is very attractive. Every leg lower in real yields will act like a slingshot higher for gold. That’s why we love Newmont. The stock trades at 6x EBITDA with a 4% dividend yield which gives you some downside protection. And remember: The 2011-2016 commodity bust has made the balance sheet of these high quality gold mining companies a lot stronger.\n\nPresident Joe Biden has just signed off on a $1.9 trillion economic program. What are the chances of a second stimulus bill, aimed at infrastructure?\n\n It’s important to note that\n a second fiscal deal for 2021 is not a slam dunk.To pass the present $1.9 trillion stimulus bill, the Democrats used reconciliation. It’s a very special trick in US politics, because with reconciliation you don’t need 60 votes to pass a bill in the Senate. All you need is 50 votes. Yet, reconciliation has to be tied to a budget year. This means the next time the Democrats can use it is probably in the fourth quarter, late November or December, and tie it to the following year's budget. So the only way to do an infrastructure bill in the next six months is with a traditional piece of legislation.\n\nIs that even possible, given how wide the rift between Republicans and Democrats has opened in recent years?\n\n For that you need essentially ten Republicans. Right now, the centrists on the Hill, people like Mitt Romney on the Republican side or Joe Manchin on the Democrat side, are the most powerful people in Washington. They want to do an infrastructure program, but they want to finance it with tax revenue. They don’t believe in things like Modern Monetary Theory where the Fed is financing the deficit.\n So you are going to need a tax hike. And in this regard, we’re hearing they could go after some type of flat tax on the FAANGs, the big technology companies.\n\nWhat does this mean for Apple, Google, Facebook and other tech heavyweights?\n\n Keep in mind, we’re in a populist revolution:\n The risk of inequality leading to social unrest is high, and that puts pressure on politicians to pass bills to tax the rich.But a wealth tax is extremely complicated, it would take years. The simplest way to do something in terms of taxes is to tax larger companies. In the eighties, the top 100 companies in the US maintained about 45 to 50% of total profits. Today, the largest 20 companies command about 85 to 90%. In addition to that, close to 40% of the S&P 500’s market cap is related to tech. So tech is the low hanging fruit for the populists in Congress to go after.\n\nOne more reason why tech stocks remain under pressure?\n\n We run a bunch of models. For example, we look at Berkshire Hathaway’s share price versus the Nasdaq 100 or the Dow Jones Industrial versus the Nasdaq. March 8th was the second time in 2021 that the Nasdaq closed down 2% with the Dow closing higher.\n We haven’t seen this type of data since the dotcom crash. It’s a very rare event which historically coincides with a longer-term rotation out of technology stocks. That’s a very encouraging signal for value stocks.In this regard, we like the EWU ETF. It’s a wonderful basket of stocks because it’s full of financials and world class names like BP, Rio Tinto or Glencore. Officially, it’s called the United Kingdom ETF, but it’s more like a global value ETF.\n\nDoes this mean that the rotation towards cyclical stocks has only just begun?\n\nMany investors around the world are long a portfolio of stocks that was designed for the deflationary environment of the previous decade.The decade ahead of us - with all what’s ahead in terms of fiscal and monetary stimulus, populism, regulation and taxes - will push investors toward more globally value related stocks. That’s where the best returns are going to be.\n\nSo the previously successful «buy the dip» strategy of simply buying more tech stocks after every decline no longer works?\n\nThe potency of dip-buying is in decay mode.Global value is really starting to kick tech in the teeth, and when that happens, it wakes up what's called «real money». Keep in mind: There is fast money, mostly hedge funds which are nimble and make quick moves. In contrast, real money moves slowly. Those types of investors don’t make asset allocation decisions quickly. They base their decisions on committees and all kinds of meetings. As a result, tectonic plates are shifting beneath our feet. We’ve seen tremors after tremors where value is starting to crush growth, and now the earthquake is coming. At Bear Traps, we have a Bloomberg chat with 650 institutional investors, and I can tell just by these conversations, that the real money is starting to move.\n And when the real money moves, that’s when the big quake happens.\n\nWhat kind of dislocations will this cause?\n\nTech will probably be down 30 to 40% sometime between now and the end of October.Today, the market cap of the Nasdaq 100 is close to $12 trillion, but most large-cap tech stocks are unchanged since July last year, while commodity and value-related equities are up 20 to 50%. In the US, if you talk to a hundred high-net-worth families, every one of those families owns Apple, Google, Facebook and Amazon. But look what’s happening: Amazon’s stock is flat since the 4th of July 2020. That's $1.5 trillion of dead money. Last Friday, Amazon failed at the 200-day moving average again.\n This is like Mike Tyson getting defeated by Buster Douglas, one of the greatest upsets in sports history. This psychology is moving through the market, pushing the capital migration process into value and commodity plays.\n\nHowever, investments in commodities are mostly not compliant with the trend towards ESG standards; especially when it comes to CO2 emissions.\n\nThe best ESG trade on the board is nuclear power. The largest uranium company in the US is Cameco with a $7 market cap.Think about that relative to Elon Musk’s net worth! I support the Green New Deal, but this needs time, because solar and wind are still too far away to produce the amount of energy needed around the world, especially in India and China. The only way to meet that demand is through nuclear power. Uranium is coming out of a ten-year bear market, and it’s going into a massive new bull market. All the contracts between power plants and uranium producers are going to be adjusted. That’s why we like the URA ETF which owns companies like Cameco. I see some of these companies as six baggers: 500% upside potential and 30 to 40% downside risk, because uranium is still a risky commodity.\n\nIn our last conversation, you recommended investments in the energy sector. Since then, names such as Chevron, Royal Dutch Shell or Exxon Mobil have advanced 25 to 60%. What do you advise investors to do now?\n\nFor now, we’ve cut our energy book:We’ve sold half of our shares in Chevron, and we’ve sold two thirds of our positions in Exxon Mobil and in the XLE ETF. What happens when you get into the fourth, fifth and sixth innings of a commodity cycle, tertiary sectors like metallurgical coal become more attractive. Sure, met coal, also known as coking coal, is not ESG friendly, but there is no way around it for steel production and hence the construction of skyscrapers, bridges and things like that. So coming into this infrastructure boom all around the world, coal has plenty of upside. That’s why we own names like Arch Resources and Peabody Energy. They’re low-leveraged, and really cheap, once again, on a risk/reward basis.\n\nWhat are the biggest dangers to watch out for in the coming weeks and months?\n\nOne spot to watch are all these forbearance deals in commercial real estate.When we come out of Covid and the vaccines and the stimulus money are juicing through the economy, the market will be forcing the release of the forbearance on a lot of these loans. So if people don’t come back fast enough to the cities, these commercial real estate loans are going to get reset. This would mean some big defaults, and the banks own a lot of these loans. Also, a lot of leveraged loans are really rich. And then, there is potentially a fiscal cliff:\n The sustainability of the $1.9 trillion stimulus package isn’t that great because a lot of it is just transfer payments replacing lost income for people staying at home. That’s why the US needs a second stimulus bill. If we don’t get a second bill, we are going to have a problem in about a year from now.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":365,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":325483112,"gmtCreate":1615912849636,"gmtModify":1704788464414,"author":{"id":"3576336077780129","authorId":"3576336077780129","name":"moJoe","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/51b5f1e98cb521c4bd52447b0ea6e905","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3576336077780129","idStr":"3576336077780129"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Nxt big thing..","listText":"Nxt big thing..","text":"Nxt big thing..","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/325483112","repostId":"1178891078","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":512,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":325432809,"gmtCreate":1615911221001,"gmtModify":1704788441172,"author":{"id":"3576336077780129","authorId":"3576336077780129","name":"moJoe","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/51b5f1e98cb521c4bd52447b0ea6e905","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3576336077780129","idStr":"3576336077780129"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Oh well.","listText":"Oh well.","text":"Oh well.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/325432809","repostId":"325808755","repostType":1,"repost":{"id":325808755,"gmtCreate":1615883210674,"gmtModify":1704787870408,"author":{"id":"36984908995200","authorId":"36984908995200","name":"小虎活动","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/44a4f89726b3f6319d06a0075bf9ff76","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"36984908995200","idStr":"36984908995200"},"themes":[],"title":"【曬單有獎】劇震中依然賺錢的股票","htmlText":"沒想到啊，春節後才過了1個月，比慘大會就比了三屆，本來以爲是牛回頭，結果變成了牛掉頭。最近的下跌，更是讓人韭韭不能平靜。然而就是在這種震盪行情中，依然有虎友買到了賺錢的股票，有的虎友甚至取得了翻倍的收益，真是太牛了！默默的看了一眼自己的賬戶迴歸正題，歡迎各位小虎參與本期曬單活動，以實盤論英雄，曬持倉當王者，凡是參與曬單的小虎均可獲得66積分虎幣，除此以外，還會有188， 666，888等積分隨機送出。當然如果你願意多聊2句，我們也會有限量眼罩送給你 【活動時間】 即日起至3月22日 【參與方式】 在本帖留言曬單，或者發帖並關聯主題“曬曬更賺錢”分享自己持倉中不同的表情包，具體操作如下： 點擊“交易頁面”，選擇交易的股票，點擊持倉盈虧分享，即可解鎖萌萌的小虎表情包。（更新到最新版本的虎友們，除了分享單隻股票漲跌幅之外，還可以分享你賺了多少錢哦）另外，老虎App還可分享歷史訂單，感興趣的虎友們，可以試試哦友情提示：使用老虎社區網頁發帖可支持多圖哦：www.laohu8.com 【活動獎勵】 我們會爲每一個在活動期間參與曬單的虎友派發66虎幣，除此之外，我們會爲漲最多，或者最有趣的虎友發放188，666，888等積分，當然如果你願意多聊2句，我們也會有限量眼罩送給你【特別說明】 水貼、重複貼廣告、惡意營銷屬於無效內容 禁止盜圖，或者P圖，一經發現取消本次活動參與資格 獎品將於活動結束後統一派發 活動最終解釋權歸老虎社區所有","listText":"沒想到啊，春節後才過了1個月，比慘大會就比了三屆，本來以爲是牛回頭，結果變成了牛掉頭。最近的下跌，更是讓人韭韭不能平靜。然而就是在這種震盪行情中，依然有虎友買到了賺錢的股票，有的虎友甚至取得了翻倍的收益，真是太牛了！默默的看了一眼自己的賬戶迴歸正題，歡迎各位小虎參與本期曬單活動，以實盤論英雄，曬持倉當王者，凡是參與曬單的小虎均可獲得66積分虎幣，除此以外，還會有188， 666，888等積分隨機送出。當然如果你願意多聊2句，我們也會有限量眼罩送給你 【活動時間】 即日起至3月22日 【參與方式】 在本帖留言曬單，或者發帖並關聯主題“曬曬更賺錢”分享自己持倉中不同的表情包，具體操作如下： 點擊“交易頁面”，選擇交易的股票，點擊持倉盈虧分享，即可解鎖萌萌的小虎表情包。（更新到最新版本的虎友們，除了分享單隻股票漲跌幅之外，還可以分享你賺了多少錢哦）另外，老虎App還可分享歷史訂單，感興趣的虎友們，可以試試哦友情提示：使用老虎社區網頁發帖可支持多圖哦：www.laohu8.com 【活動獎勵】 我們會爲每一個在活動期間參與曬單的虎友派發66虎幣，除此之外，我們會爲漲最多，或者最有趣的虎友發放188，666，888等積分，當然如果你願意多聊2句，我們也會有限量眼罩送給你【特別說明】 水貼、重複貼廣告、惡意營銷屬於無效內容 禁止盜圖，或者P圖，一經發現取消本次活動參與資格 獎品將於活動結束後統一派發 活動最終解釋權歸老虎社區所有","text":"沒想到啊，春節後才過了1個月，比慘大會就比了三屆，本來以爲是牛回頭，結果變成了牛掉頭。最近的下跌，更是讓人韭韭不能平靜。然而就是在這種震盪行情中，依然有虎友買到了賺錢的股票，有的虎友甚至取得了翻倍的收益，真是太牛了！默默的看了一眼自己的賬戶迴歸正題，歡迎各位小虎參與本期曬單活動，以實盤論英雄，曬持倉當王者，凡是參與曬單的小虎均可獲得66積分虎幣，除此以外，還會有188， 666，888等積分隨機送出。當然如果你願意多聊2句，我們也會有限量眼罩送給你 【活動時間】 即日起至3月22日 【參與方式】 在本帖留言曬單，或者發帖並關聯主題“曬曬更賺錢”分享自己持倉中不同的表情包，具體操作如下： 點擊“交易頁面”，選擇交易的股票，點擊持倉盈虧分享，即可解鎖萌萌的小虎表情包。（更新到最新版本的虎友們，除了分享單隻股票漲跌幅之外，還可以分享你賺了多少錢哦）另外，老虎App還可分享歷史訂單，感興趣的虎友們，可以試試哦友情提示：使用老虎社區網頁發帖可支持多圖哦：www.laohu8.com 【活動獎勵】 我們會爲每一個在活動期間參與曬單的虎友派發66虎幣，除此之外，我們會爲漲最多，或者最有趣的虎友發放188，666，888等積分，當然如果你願意多聊2句，我們也會有限量眼罩送給你【特別說明】 水貼、重複貼廣告、惡意營銷屬於無效內容 禁止盜圖，或者P圖，一經發現取消本次活動參與資格 獎品將於活動結束後統一派發 活動最終解釋權歸老虎社區所有","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/31ede8944d9ab6046edceb62ce38aace","width":"1271","height":"647"},{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a2e8e737396edc742a102a1fe778f32c","width":"830","height":"556"},{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3ec6b3c4f39347e48da2fc78d93f5569","width":"830","height":"674"}],"top":1,"highlighted":2,"essential":2,"paper":2,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/325808755","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":0,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":7,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":371,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":358900867,"gmtCreate":1616646022059,"gmtModify":1704796868276,"author":{"id":"3576336077780129","authorId":"3576336077780129","name":"moJoe","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/51b5f1e98cb521c4bd52447b0ea6e905","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576336077780129","authorIdStr":"3576336077780129"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"And there you go folks the scare tactics of the media backed by the hedge funds..","listText":"And there you go folks the scare tactics of the media backed by the hedge funds..","text":"And there you go folks the scare tactics of the media backed by the hedge funds..","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":8,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/358900867","repostId":"1110970491","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1110970491","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1616632658,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1110970491?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-03-25 08:37","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Tech and GameStop losses have traders wondering if retail investors are losing interest in market","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1110970491","media":"cnbc","summary":"It was a bad day for Cathie Wood.\nAnd it was a very strange trading day.\nFor weeks, stocks have been","content":"<div>\n<p>It was a bad day for Cathie Wood.\nAnd it was a very strange trading day.\nFor weeks, stocks have been held hostage to Treasury yields, particularly the 10-year.  As yields moved up, stocks, ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/03/24/tech-and-gamestop-losses-have-traders-wondering-if-retail-investors-are-losing-interest-in-market.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"cnbc_highlight","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Tech and GameStop losses have traders wondering if retail investors are losing interest in market</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTech and GameStop losses have traders wondering if retail investors are losing interest in market\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-03-25 08:37 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.cnbc.com/2021/03/24/tech-and-gamestop-losses-have-traders-wondering-if-retail-investors-are-losing-interest-in-market.html><strong>cnbc</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>It was a bad day for Cathie Wood.\nAnd it was a very strange trading day.\nFor weeks, stocks have been held hostage to Treasury yields, particularly the 10-year.  As yields moved up, stocks, ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/03/24/tech-and-gamestop-losses-have-traders-wondering-if-retail-investors-are-losing-interest-in-market.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"GME":"游戏驿站"},"source_url":"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/03/24/tech-and-gamestop-losses-have-traders-wondering-if-retail-investors-are-losing-interest-in-market.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/72bb72e1b84c09fca865c6dcb1bbcd16","article_id":"1110970491","content_text":"It was a bad day for Cathie Wood.\nAnd it was a very strange trading day.\nFor weeks, stocks have been held hostage to Treasury yields, particularly the 10-year.  As yields moved up, stocks, particularly high-multiple megacap stocks, moved down.  If yields dropped, tech rallied.\nThat relationship has broken down.\nYields have been down three days in a row, yet tech did not react.\nMegacap tech like Facebook, Amazon, Apple, Micron, and Xilinx were down 1.5% to 3%.\nMore importantly, the market's favoritehigh-growth names got clobbered.\nWood'sARK Innovation Fund (ARKK), a bellwether for the big-growth tech crowd, was down 5% and is now 28% off the 52-week high it hit on February 16, which is just when interest rates starting moving up.\nArk Innovation Fund on Wednesday\n(largest holdings)\n\nCrispr  down 9%\nBaidu down 9%\nZoom down 7%\nRokudown 7%\nTeladoc down 6%.\n\n\"You'd think with all this stimulus, money would be pouring into Cathie Wood [funds], and it's just not happening,\" Josh Brown, CEO of Ritholtz Wealth Management, said on CNBC.\n Are retail traders losing interest?\nOne major surprise has been a pullback in volume.  The NYSE volume was 80% of the 30-day average, Nasdaq activity was 90% of the average, unusually low volume given the declines in certain sectors.\n\"Volume was heavy for Triple Witching last Friday, but Monday, Tuesday and today volumes have been light,\" Rich Repetto from Piper Sandler told me\nHave retail traders, who have been such a large part of the increase in volume last year, suddenly lost interest?\n\"It seems to show that the retail customer has walked away,\" Matt Maley from Miller Tabak told me.  \"The question is, why? Is it higher rates?  Concerns about lockdowns? Or are they betting on March Madness?\"\nAnother example:  Reddit favorite GameStop wasdown all day on disappointing earningsbut collapsed going into the close, down 33%. But only 23 million shares changed hands, well short of the 30-day average of 34 million shares.\nLow volume on a big down day implies not a lot of owners interested in selling, but also not many buyers interested in purchasing, even with shares down over 30%.\nSame with another Reddit-crowd favorite:  AMC, down 15% on volume two-thirds of its average.\nIs Cathie Wood the key?\nFor the high-beta, high-growth, high-momentum crowd, watching Wood has been an obsession.  Maley says the flagship Ark Innovation fund is now set up for a key technical test.\n\n\"The closing low for ARK was $110.26 on March 8th,\" he told me.  It bounced nicely off of that, but has been trending down for the last week, Maley noted.\n\"It closed today at $114. If it drops below that $110 level, that will be very negative on a technical basis,\" with the trader noting that a \"lower low\" is usually a negative indicator.\n\"If buy on weakness doesn't work this time, that is going to worry a lot of people,\" Maley said.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":799,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":351273095,"gmtCreate":1616600119117,"gmtModify":1704796319078,"author":{"id":"3576336077780129","authorId":"3576336077780129","name":"moJoe","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/51b5f1e98cb521c4bd52447b0ea6e905","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576336077780129","authorIdStr":"3576336077780129"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Its only a scare tactic. Hedge funds must be hurting bad..","listText":"Its only a scare tactic. Hedge funds must be hurting bad..","text":"Its only a scare tactic. Hedge funds must be hurting bad..","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/351273095","repostId":"2121457670","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2121457670","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1616597870,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2121457670?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-03-24 22:57","market":"us","language":"en","title":"4 Dangerous Robinhood Stocks That Could Lose 50% or More, According to Wall Street","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2121457670","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Retail investors could lose a boatload of money from these highly popular stocks.","content":"<p>It's possible that when the curtain closes on 2021, it'll be remembered as the year of the retail investor.</p><p>Since March 2020, we've seen a big uptick in the number of millennials who've put their money to work in the stock market. Online investing app Robinhood, which is known for its commission-free trading platform and gifting of free shares of stock to new users, attracted 3 million new members last year. That's noteworthy given the average age of Robinhood's user base is only 31.</p><p>On one hand, it's great to see young investors who have time as their ally putting money to work in the world's greatest wealth creator. On the other hand, quite a few of these young investors aren't thinking long term. Rather, they're caught up in the recent retail investor-fueled Reddit frenzy and looking to get rich quick.</p><p>The problem with the get-rich-quick strategy is that it rarely works -- and Wall Street knows it.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ebe3f403b1b970d0e231952ef9c1d01c\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>Image source: Getty Images.</span></p><p>At the moment, there are four widely held stocks on Robinhood that, according to Wall Street's <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a>-year consensus price targets, are expected to lose at least half their value, if not more. If these analyst estimates prove accurate, these dangerous Robinhood stocks could cost unsuspecting retail investors a boatload of money.</p><h2>GameStop: Implied downside of 93%</h2><p>Perhaps it's no surprise that the riskiest Robinhood stock of all is the company that started the Reddit frenzy, <b>GameStop</b> (NYSE:GME). Shares of the video game and accessories company are up nearly 4,700% over the past year, but offer 93% downside, if Wall Street's consensus is correct.</p><p>What made GameStop such a popular company to own among retail investors was its high short interest. Entering January, no public company had a higher percentage of shares held short, relative to its float. Because of this short interest, a flood of buyers were able to execute an epic short squeeze.</p><p>Unfortunately, most of the Reddit rally stocks have poor underlying fundamentals and/or a dubious long-term outlook. When it comes to GameStop, its biggest issue was waiting too long to focus on digital gaming. Even with its renewed focus on e-commerce, total sales for the company declined, once again, during the most recent holiday season. Further, GameStop is almost certainly staring down its fourth consecutive annual loss in 2021.</p><p>If there is some good news here, it's that GameStop isn't a lost cause. Eventually, it'll close enough stores to reduce its expenses to the point where it's profitable again. But there's a big difference between growth with a profit and backpedaling into a profit. GameStop is doing the latter, which is what has Wall Street rightly concerned.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1c6cb4d9fcdf85f542f333fc71a2dd58\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>Image source: Getty Images.</span></p><h2>AMC Entertainment: Implied downside of 75%</h2><p>Movie theater chain <b>AMC Entertainment</b> (NYSE:AMC), which has risen in lockstep with GameStop for much of the past two months, is also on Wall Street's naughty list. Putting aside the $0.01 price target recently issued by one analyst, the Wall Street consensus is that AMC will lose three-quarters of its value over the next year.</p><p>AMC's outperformance over the past two months has to do with Reddit traders piling into the company, as well as folks betting on the reopening trade. AMC recently announced that 99% of its theaters would be open by March 26.</p><p>However, this optimism looks highly flawed. Many of the company's theaters are still facing capacity restrictions, and there are no guarantees that the coronavirus pandemic will officially end in 2021. New variants of the disease, along with vaccine holdouts, threaten to push herd immunity and a return to normal further down the road.</p><p>The company's solvency is also a potential concern. Even with more than $1 billion in cash on hand, Wall Street is expecting AMC to lose more than $1.7 billion, total, over the next two years. This implies the need to issue more dilutive stock or more debt.</p><p>As the icing on the cake, AMC is also losing some of its new release exclusivity to streaming service providers. At long last, the movie theater industry is being disrupted -- but that's not a good thing for AMC.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/91f6037829ea3fb0ae1cae0b95d8d11e\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>Image source: Getty Images.</span></p><h2>Riot Blockchain: Implied downside of 54%</h2><p>Wall Street also views cryptocurrency mining stock <b>Riot Blockchain</b> (NASDAQ:RIOT) as a dangerous investment. The 76th most-held stock on Robinhood is projected to lose 54% of its value over the next year, according to analysts on Wall Street.</p><p>Riot Blockchain's incredible outperformance in recent months can be tied to the rally in <b>Bitcoin</b> (CRYPTO:BTC), the world's largest digital currency. As a cryptocurrency miner, Riot uses high-powered computers to validate groups of transactions (known as blocks) on Bitcoin's network. For validating blocks, Riot is given a block reward totaling 6.25 Bitcoin (worth about $365,000). In short, the higher Bitcoin goes, the more these block rewards are worth.</p><p>While this sounds like a pretty straightforward investment, it's not that simple. For example, the asset Riot is \"mining\" has had three separate instances over the past decade where it's lost at least 80% of its value. It's not clear if mining companies could survive such a protracted downtrend in Bitcoin.</p><p>It's equally concerning that Riot Blockchain's future is entirely tethered to the performance of Bitcoin. This is an operating model that's pretty much devoid of innovation and is constantly facing a growing number of competitors. Add on the halving of Bitcoin's block rewards every couple of years, and I believe there's more than enough incentive to stay far away from Riot Blockchain.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5811406aed4001edc942cb25310a21cf\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"467\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>Image source: Getty Images.</span></p><h2>Sundial Growers: Implied downside of 54%</h2><p>Finally, Wall Street views the fourth most-held Robinhood stock, <b>Sundial Growers</b> (NASDAQ:SNDL), as trouble. Shares of Canadian marijuana stock Sundial are higher by more than 900% since late October.</p><p>Similar to GameStop and AMC, Sundial and its high short interest have benefited from the Reddit frenzy. Investors also appear to be betting on the U.S. legalizing cannabis at the federal level. Doing so would allow Canadian marijuana stocks like Sundial to enter the far more lucrative U.S. weed market.</p><p>But if there's something tenured investors are very familiar with, it's the idea that all next-big-thing investments have losers. Even though marijuana is expected to be one of the fastest-growing industries this decade, Sundial hasn't demonstrated anything from an operational perspective to suggest that it'd be a winner.</p><p>One thing Sundial has done successfully is drown its existing investors in a sea of new shares. In a roughly five-month span, the company issued more than 1.15 billion shares via at-the-market offerings, registered direct offerings, and debt-to-equity swaps. Retail investors are quick to point to Sundial's mountain of new cash raised as a positive, but fail to see how the company's massive share count will cripple its potential for a long time to come.</p><p>With it looking less likely that the U.S. federal government will change its tune on cannabis at the federal level, and Sundial delivering ongoing losses and mediocre sales growth, it qualifies as the No. 1 pot stock worth avoiding.</p>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>4 Dangerous Robinhood Stocks That Could Lose 50% or More, According to Wall Street</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n4 Dangerous Robinhood Stocks That Could Lose 50% or More, According to Wall Street\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-03-24 22:57 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/03/24/4-dangerous-robinhood-stocks-lose-50-wall-street/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>It's possible that when the curtain closes on 2021, it'll be remembered as the year of the retail investor.Since March 2020, we've seen a big uptick in the number of millennials who've put their money...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/03/24/4-dangerous-robinhood-stocks-lose-50-wall-street/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"GME":"游戏驿站","SNDL":"SNDL Inc.","RIOT":"Riot Platforms","AMC":"AMC院线"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/03/24/4-dangerous-robinhood-stocks-lose-50-wall-street/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2121457670","content_text":"It's possible that when the curtain closes on 2021, it'll be remembered as the year of the retail investor.Since March 2020, we've seen a big uptick in the number of millennials who've put their money to work in the stock market. Online investing app Robinhood, which is known for its commission-free trading platform and gifting of free shares of stock to new users, attracted 3 million new members last year. That's noteworthy given the average age of Robinhood's user base is only 31.On one hand, it's great to see young investors who have time as their ally putting money to work in the world's greatest wealth creator. On the other hand, quite a few of these young investors aren't thinking long term. Rather, they're caught up in the recent retail investor-fueled Reddit frenzy and looking to get rich quick.The problem with the get-rich-quick strategy is that it rarely works -- and Wall Street knows it.Image source: Getty Images.At the moment, there are four widely held stocks on Robinhood that, according to Wall Street's one-year consensus price targets, are expected to lose at least half their value, if not more. If these analyst estimates prove accurate, these dangerous Robinhood stocks could cost unsuspecting retail investors a boatload of money.GameStop: Implied downside of 93%Perhaps it's no surprise that the riskiest Robinhood stock of all is the company that started the Reddit frenzy, GameStop (NYSE:GME). Shares of the video game and accessories company are up nearly 4,700% over the past year, but offer 93% downside, if Wall Street's consensus is correct.What made GameStop such a popular company to own among retail investors was its high short interest. Entering January, no public company had a higher percentage of shares held short, relative to its float. Because of this short interest, a flood of buyers were able to execute an epic short squeeze.Unfortunately, most of the Reddit rally stocks have poor underlying fundamentals and/or a dubious long-term outlook. When it comes to GameStop, its biggest issue was waiting too long to focus on digital gaming. Even with its renewed focus on e-commerce, total sales for the company declined, once again, during the most recent holiday season. Further, GameStop is almost certainly staring down its fourth consecutive annual loss in 2021.If there is some good news here, it's that GameStop isn't a lost cause. Eventually, it'll close enough stores to reduce its expenses to the point where it's profitable again. But there's a big difference between growth with a profit and backpedaling into a profit. GameStop is doing the latter, which is what has Wall Street rightly concerned.Image source: Getty Images.AMC Entertainment: Implied downside of 75%Movie theater chain AMC Entertainment (NYSE:AMC), which has risen in lockstep with GameStop for much of the past two months, is also on Wall Street's naughty list. Putting aside the $0.01 price target recently issued by one analyst, the Wall Street consensus is that AMC will lose three-quarters of its value over the next year.AMC's outperformance over the past two months has to do with Reddit traders piling into the company, as well as folks betting on the reopening trade. AMC recently announced that 99% of its theaters would be open by March 26.However, this optimism looks highly flawed. Many of the company's theaters are still facing capacity restrictions, and there are no guarantees that the coronavirus pandemic will officially end in 2021. New variants of the disease, along with vaccine holdouts, threaten to push herd immunity and a return to normal further down the road.The company's solvency is also a potential concern. Even with more than $1 billion in cash on hand, Wall Street is expecting AMC to lose more than $1.7 billion, total, over the next two years. This implies the need to issue more dilutive stock or more debt.As the icing on the cake, AMC is also losing some of its new release exclusivity to streaming service providers. At long last, the movie theater industry is being disrupted -- but that's not a good thing for AMC.Image source: Getty Images.Riot Blockchain: Implied downside of 54%Wall Street also views cryptocurrency mining stock Riot Blockchain (NASDAQ:RIOT) as a dangerous investment. The 76th most-held stock on Robinhood is projected to lose 54% of its value over the next year, according to analysts on Wall Street.Riot Blockchain's incredible outperformance in recent months can be tied to the rally in Bitcoin (CRYPTO:BTC), the world's largest digital currency. As a cryptocurrency miner, Riot uses high-powered computers to validate groups of transactions (known as blocks) on Bitcoin's network. For validating blocks, Riot is given a block reward totaling 6.25 Bitcoin (worth about $365,000). In short, the higher Bitcoin goes, the more these block rewards are worth.While this sounds like a pretty straightforward investment, it's not that simple. For example, the asset Riot is \"mining\" has had three separate instances over the past decade where it's lost at least 80% of its value. It's not clear if mining companies could survive such a protracted downtrend in Bitcoin.It's equally concerning that Riot Blockchain's future is entirely tethered to the performance of Bitcoin. This is an operating model that's pretty much devoid of innovation and is constantly facing a growing number of competitors. Add on the halving of Bitcoin's block rewards every couple of years, and I believe there's more than enough incentive to stay far away from Riot Blockchain.Image source: Getty Images.Sundial Growers: Implied downside of 54%Finally, Wall Street views the fourth most-held Robinhood stock, Sundial Growers (NASDAQ:SNDL), as trouble. Shares of Canadian marijuana stock Sundial are higher by more than 900% since late October.Similar to GameStop and AMC, Sundial and its high short interest have benefited from the Reddit frenzy. Investors also appear to be betting on the U.S. legalizing cannabis at the federal level. Doing so would allow Canadian marijuana stocks like Sundial to enter the far more lucrative U.S. weed market.But if there's something tenured investors are very familiar with, it's the idea that all next-big-thing investments have losers. Even though marijuana is expected to be one of the fastest-growing industries this decade, Sundial hasn't demonstrated anything from an operational perspective to suggest that it'd be a winner.One thing Sundial has done successfully is drown its existing investors in a sea of new shares. In a roughly five-month span, the company issued more than 1.15 billion shares via at-the-market offerings, registered direct offerings, and debt-to-equity swaps. Retail investors are quick to point to Sundial's mountain of new cash raised as a positive, but fail to see how the company's massive share count will cripple its potential for a long time to come.With it looking less likely that the U.S. federal government will change its tune on cannabis at the federal level, and Sundial delivering ongoing losses and mediocre sales growth, it qualifies as the No. 1 pot stock worth avoiding.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":446,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":325483619,"gmtCreate":1615912937931,"gmtModify":1704788465226,"author":{"id":"3576336077780129","authorId":"3576336077780129","name":"moJoe","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/51b5f1e98cb521c4bd52447b0ea6e905","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576336077780129","authorIdStr":"3576336077780129"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hmmmm.","listText":"Hmmmm.","text":"Hmmmm.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/325483619","repostId":"1121564086","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1121564086","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1615899026,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1121564086?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-03-16 20:50","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Larry McDonald Warns \"The Big [Market] Quake Is Coming\"","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1121564086","media":"zerohedge","summary":"The mood is testy. Yields on Treasuries are rising, the dollar is trending stronger, and major tech ","content":"<p>The mood is testy. Yields on Treasuries are rising, the dollar is trending stronger, and major tech stocks are under pressure. Accordingly, tensions are high when the Federal Reserve decides on the future course of its monetary policy this Wednesday.</p>\n<p><i><b>«The Fed has its back against the wall,»</b></i>says Larry McDonald during a conversation via Zoom. The internationally renowned macro strategist and former senior trader at Lehman Brothers warns that the Federal Reserve has little time to mitigate the explosive situation in the bond and currency markets. Otherwise, he says, the global economy is at risk of another crisis.</p>\n<p>Since last spring, the founder of the independent investment advisor&nbsp;The Bear Traps Report&nbsp;has been&nbsp;recommending investments&nbsp;in the commodity sector, where he believes a new super cycle has begun. He&nbsp;reiterated his recommendation&nbsp;during his last conversation with The Market in late 2020. Today, his call for a big reflation trade has become the consensus on Wall Street.</p>\n<p>In this new interview with The Market/NZZ, which has been edited and condensed for clarity, Larry McDonald tells why he expects the Federal Reserve to resort to yield curve control fairly soon and what that will mean for gold and silver. He also explains why the rotation into commodities and value stocks is only just beginning and where he currently sees the best opportunities for investments.</p>\n<p><b>After the turmoil of the past few weeks, all eyes are on the Federal Reserve. What can investors expect from Wednesday's Fed meeting?</b></p>\n<blockquote>\n <b>We’re at a point where the market is moving way ahead of the Federal Reserve.</b>The Fed is on «outcome-based guidance», but the beast, that serpent in the market, wants more than that. Basically, the market is saying: «The US economy is going to grow 6 or 7% this year, and that will force you to taper in Q3 or Q4.» As investors are pricing in a tapering of the Fed’s asset purchases, financial conditions are tightening; especially in emerging markets, where spreads on credit default swaps are rising. So far, financial conditions are nowhere near extremely dangerous levels. But the problem is everybody thinks we’re in a similar situation as back in 2018.\n</blockquote>\n<p><b>What do you mean by that?</b></p>\n<blockquote>\n Once again, the Fed is playing «Tough Guy»: The market demands a policy pivot, but the Fed is trying to hold on to its path, essentially signaling to investors: «No way, relax». We had a similar set-up in 2013, 2016 and 2018. These were the three most significant monetary policy shifts where market pressures broke the Fed's desired policy path.\n <b>The problem is that back then the Fed had far more rope to play Tough Guy since the economy was stronger. In 2018 for instance</b>, the US economy was creating hundreds of thousands of jobs a month. In contrast, today’s employment-to-population ratio is 3.5 percentage points below January 2020 levels. This means 13 million Americans are outside the labor force. To get back to pre-pandemic levels, the economy has to create more than 540,000 jobs a month for two years.\n</blockquote>\n<p><b>So what does this mean for this week's Fed meeting?</b></p>\n<blockquote>\n <b>The Fed is planet earth’s central bank. Every time they tried to play Tough Guy, they’ve blown up the global economy.</b>This time, the Fed's Tough Guy window is much smaller. In 2018 or 2013 that window was nine to ten months. Now, it’s like two months because the economy is so weak. If they let financial conditions tighten further, they risk a major default cycle.\n <b>The negative multiplier effect of a stronger dollar is much higher to the world economy than the Fed anticipates</b>. They can't afford to let the dollar rip higher, because there is so much dollar denominated debt in the world, so much trade tied to the Greenback. If they blow that up, it will just blow back to the US and force the Fed into a policy shift anyway. It’s like with an oil change at the car repair shop: You can pay now or you can pay later. That’s why the Fed has to pay now.\n</blockquote>\n<p><b>Why?</b></p>\n<blockquote>\n <b>The Fed’s back is against the wall, all points to proactive action on March 17.</b>They must suppress taper fears and cut these risks off, or else they blow up the global economy for the 4th time since 2013. We’re hearing that they’re already getting incoming calls from emerging market central banks right now. If Fed Chairman Jay Powell plays Tough Guy by staying with the current path, without offering further assurances of deeper, more sustainable accommodation, the beast inside the market will keep pushing him until he breaks. We will see a repeat of Q4 2018 and Q1 2019, where the Fed was forced into an utterly embarrassing pivot. One of those is enough for Powell’s legacy, he doesn’t want two.\n</blockquote>\n<p><b>What kind of measures can be expected?</b></p>\n<blockquote>\n <b>Eventually, we will get the taper, but the overwhelming point is other weapons have to come first.</b>A Federal Reserve offering insufficient accommodation places markets in the crosshairs of a risk-off event. The first thing they will try to do is give some hard data points. For example, the US economy has to create 10 million jobs for the Fed to do anything on the balance sheet. Another way they can get out is calendar guidance, but that’s a more sophisticated weaponry. Bottom line, they should just say: «From now until the end of the year QE will continue at $120 billion a month, and we want PCE-inflation to get to between 2 and 2.5% and stay there for 24 months.» With that in place,\n <b>all they have to do is open the door two or three inches for yield curve control, and they can contain the dollar.</b>\n</blockquote>\n<p><b>The last time the Federal Reserve used yield curve control was during the time of World War II. Why would it resort to such a radical measure?</b></p>\n<blockquote>\n <b>Here’s the dirty little secret: Too many Treasury bonds are for sale.</b>There aren’t enough buyers, and that will force the Fed to step in. More than $3.6 trillion of US government paper was issued in 2020 versus $2.9 trillion in the prior year. With the new $1.9 trillion fiscal package coming from Washington, issuance in 2021 is slated to rise to $4 trillion. That’s a lot more than the Fed’s Treasury purchases through QE, so the spread between QE and debt issuance gets much wider. Washington is doing so much fiscal stimulus, I’m confident that this is going to force the Fed into yield curve control by September. If that’s the case, it will pressure the dollar lower and put commodities, value stocks, global cyclicals, materials and emerging markets into rotation overdrive.\n</blockquote>\n<p><b>How come?</b></p>\n<blockquote>\n <b>Yield curve control deployment is the tactical nuclear weaponry.</b>If the Fed throws out yield curve control just as a threat, it will suppress Treasury rates and real yields will go much more negative. Over the last couple of months, the issuance has overpowered inflation expectations. Think of it as a car race: Treasury issuances were driving up yields faster than inflation expectations rose. But if the Fed starts to acknowledge that they are going to bring out new weapons like calendar guidance and yield curve control, then they’re suppressing nominal yields. So if inflation expectations continue to rise, then real yields go big negative – and that’s when gold and silver will take off. I think silver can double from here until early next year. Gold could be up 50%.\n</blockquote>\n<p><b>How can investors best position themselves in this environment?</b></p>\n<blockquote>\n In terms of emerging markets, we’re\n <b>long Chile and Brazil.</b>In Asia, South Korea looks attractive. We also like the KWEB ETF which consists of the big Chinese tech stocks. In the commodity space, we have a position in the XME ETF which owns mainly\n <b>copper and steel names.</b>One of the best companies we own is Teck Resources. This stock is almost like a commodity mutual fund, because the company has exposure to copper, nickel and even energy. Another favorite is Mosaic because in a commodity cycle where you have weather problems around the world,\n <b>agricultural plays are a good bet.</b>\n</blockquote>\n<p><b>What about precious metals?</b></p>\n<blockquote>\n <b>When it comes to precious metals, we love silver miners</b>like Hecla Mining. When the Fed eases its policy, the silver miners will outperform the underlying metal, and they will outperform gold because there is more leverage there.\n</blockquote>\n<p><b>The gold price is down more than 15% since its all-time high in August. What’s the problem?</b></p>\n<blockquote>\n <b>Everyone thinks it’s 2013, so taper fears are sky high for gold. But the Fed cannot repeat its mistakes.</b>They must cap yields if they want to preserve the global economic recovery. Thus, the convexity with gold is very attractive. Every leg lower in real yields will act like a slingshot higher for gold. That’s why we love Newmont. The stock trades at 6x EBITDA with a 4% dividend yield which gives you some downside protection. And remember: The 2011-2016 commodity bust has made the balance sheet of these high quality gold mining companies a lot stronger.\n</blockquote>\n<p><b>President Joe Biden has just signed off on a $1.9 trillion economic program. What are the chances of a second stimulus bill, aimed at infrastructure?</b></p>\n<blockquote>\n It’s important to note that\n <b>a second fiscal deal for 2021 is not a slam dunk.</b>To pass the present $1.9 trillion stimulus bill, the Democrats used reconciliation. It’s a very special trick in US politics, because with reconciliation you don’t need 60 votes to pass a bill in the Senate. All you need is 50 votes. Yet, reconciliation has to be tied to a budget year. This means the next time the Democrats can use it is probably in the fourth quarter, late November or December, and tie it to the following year's budget. So the only way to do an infrastructure bill in the next six months is with a traditional piece of legislation.\n</blockquote>\n<p><b>Is that even possible, given how wide the rift between Republicans and Democrats has opened in recent years?</b></p>\n<blockquote>\n For that you need essentially ten Republicans. Right now, the centrists on the Hill, people like Mitt Romney on the Republican side or Joe Manchin on the Democrat side, are the most powerful people in Washington. They want to do an infrastructure program, but they want to finance it with tax revenue. They don’t believe in things like Modern Monetary Theory where the Fed is financing the deficit.\n <b>So you are going to need a tax hike. And in this regard, we’re hearing they could go after some type of flat tax on the FAANGs, the big technology companies.</b>\n</blockquote>\n<p><b>What does this mean for Apple, Google, Facebook and other tech heavyweights?</b></p>\n<blockquote>\n Keep in mind, we’re in a populist revolution:\n <b>The risk of inequality leading to social unrest is high, and that puts pressure on politicians to pass bills to tax the rich.</b>But a wealth tax is extremely complicated, it would take years. The simplest way to do something in terms of taxes is to tax larger companies. In the eighties, the top 100 companies in the US maintained about 45 to 50% of total profits. Today, the largest 20 companies command about 85 to 90%. In addition to that, close to 40% of the S&amp;P 500’s market cap is related to tech. So tech is the low hanging fruit for the populists in Congress to go after.\n</blockquote>\n<p><b>One more reason why tech stocks remain under pressure?</b></p>\n<blockquote>\n We run a bunch of models. For example, we look at Berkshire Hathaway’s share price versus the Nasdaq 100 or the Dow Jones Industrial versus the Nasdaq. March 8th was the second time in 2021 that the Nasdaq closed down 2% with the Dow closing higher.\n <b>We haven’t seen this type of data since the dotcom crash. It’s a very rare event which historically coincides with a longer-term rotation out of technology stocks. That’s a very encouraging signal for value stocks.</b>In this regard, we like the EWU ETF. It’s a wonderful basket of stocks because it’s full of financials and world class names like BP, Rio Tinto or Glencore. Officially, it’s called the United Kingdom ETF, but it’s more like a global value ETF.\n</blockquote>\n<p><b>Does this mean that the rotation towards cyclical stocks has only just begun?</b></p>\n<blockquote>\n <b>Many investors around the world are long a portfolio of stocks that was designed for the deflationary environment of the previous decade.</b>The decade ahead of us - with all what’s ahead in terms of fiscal and monetary stimulus, populism, regulation and taxes - will push investors toward more globally value related stocks. That’s where the best returns are going to be.\n</blockquote>\n<p><b>So the previously successful «buy the dip» strategy of simply buying more tech stocks after every decline no longer works?</b></p>\n<blockquote>\n <b>The potency of dip-buying is in decay mode.</b>Global value is really starting to kick tech in the teeth, and when that happens, it wakes up what's called «real money». Keep in mind: There is fast money, mostly hedge funds which are nimble and make quick moves. In contrast, real money moves slowly. Those types of investors don’t make asset allocation decisions quickly. They base their decisions on committees and all kinds of meetings. As a result, tectonic plates are shifting beneath our feet. We’ve seen tremors after tremors where value is starting to crush growth, and now the earthquake is coming. At Bear Traps, we have a Bloomberg chat with 650 institutional investors, and I can tell just by these conversations, that the real money is starting to move.\n <b>And when the real money moves, that’s when the big quake happens.</b>\n</blockquote>\n<p><b>What kind of dislocations will this cause?</b></p>\n<blockquote>\n <b>Tech will probably be down 30 to 40% sometime between now and the end of October.</b>Today, the market cap of the Nasdaq 100 is close to $12 trillion, but most large-cap tech stocks are unchanged since July last year, while commodity and value-related equities are up 20 to 50%. In the US, if you talk to a hundred high-net-worth families, every one of those families owns Apple, Google, Facebook and Amazon. But look what’s happening: Amazon’s stock is flat since the 4th of July 2020. That's $1.5 trillion of dead money. Last Friday, Amazon failed at the 200-day moving average again.\n <b>This is like Mike Tyson getting defeated by Buster Douglas, one of the greatest upsets in sports history. This psychology is moving through the market, pushing the capital migration process into value and commodity plays.</b>\n</blockquote>\n<p><b>However, investments in commodities are mostly not compliant with the trend towards ESG standards; especially when it comes to CO2 emissions.</b></p>\n<blockquote>\n <b>The best ESG trade on the board is nuclear power. The largest uranium company in the US is Cameco with a $7 market cap.</b>Think about that relative to Elon Musk’s net worth! I support the Green New Deal, but this needs time, because solar and wind are still too far away to produce the amount of energy needed around the world, especially in India and China. The only way to meet that demand is through nuclear power. Uranium is coming out of a ten-year bear market, and it’s going into a massive new bull market. All the contracts between power plants and uranium producers are going to be adjusted. That’s why we like the URA ETF which owns companies like Cameco. I see some of these companies as six baggers: 500% upside potential and 30 to 40% downside risk, because uranium is still a risky commodity.\n</blockquote>\n<p><b>In our&nbsp;last conversation, you recommended investments in the energy sector. Since then, names such as Chevron, Royal Dutch Shell or Exxon Mobil have advanced 25 to 60%. What do you advise investors to do now?</b></p>\n<blockquote>\n <b>For now, we’ve cut our energy book:</b>We’ve sold half of our shares in Chevron, and we’ve sold two thirds of our positions in Exxon Mobil and in the XLE ETF. What happens when you get into the fourth, fifth and sixth innings of a commodity cycle, tertiary sectors like metallurgical coal become more attractive. Sure, met coal, also known as coking coal, is not ESG friendly, but there is no way around it for steel production and hence the construction of skyscrapers, bridges and things like that. So coming into this infrastructure boom all around the world, coal has plenty of upside. That’s why we own names like Arch Resources and Peabody Energy. They’re low-leveraged, and really cheap, once again, on a risk/reward basis.\n</blockquote>\n<p><b>What are the biggest dangers to watch out for in the coming weeks and months?</b></p>\n<blockquote>\n <b>One spot to watch are all these forbearance deals in commercial real estate.</b>When we come out of Covid and the vaccines and the stimulus money are juicing through the economy, the market will be forcing the release of the forbearance on a lot of these loans. So if people don’t come back fast enough to the cities, these commercial real estate loans are going to get reset. This would mean some big defaults, and the banks own a lot of these loans. Also, a lot of leveraged loans are really rich. And then, there is potentially a fiscal cliff:\n <b>The sustainability of the $1.9 trillion stimulus package isn’t that great because a lot of it is just transfer payments replacing lost income for people staying at home. That’s why the US needs a second stimulus bill. If we don’t get a second bill, we are going to have a problem in about a year from now.</b>\n</blockquote>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Larry McDonald Warns \"The Big [Market] Quake Is Coming\"</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nLarry McDonald Warns \"The Big [Market] Quake Is Coming\"\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-03-16 20:50 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/larry-mcdonald-warns-big-market-quake-coming><strong>zerohedge</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The mood is testy. Yields on Treasuries are rising, the dollar is trending stronger, and major tech stocks are under pressure. Accordingly, tensions are high when the Federal Reserve decides on the ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/larry-mcdonald-warns-big-market-quake-coming\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯","SPY":"标普500ETF",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/larry-mcdonald-warns-big-market-quake-coming","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1121564086","content_text":"The mood is testy. Yields on Treasuries are rising, the dollar is trending stronger, and major tech stocks are under pressure. Accordingly, tensions are high when the Federal Reserve decides on the future course of its monetary policy this Wednesday.\n«The Fed has its back against the wall,»says Larry McDonald during a conversation via Zoom. The internationally renowned macro strategist and former senior trader at Lehman Brothers warns that the Federal Reserve has little time to mitigate the explosive situation in the bond and currency markets. Otherwise, he says, the global economy is at risk of another crisis.\nSince last spring, the founder of the independent investment advisor The Bear Traps Report has been recommending investments in the commodity sector, where he believes a new super cycle has begun. He reiterated his recommendation during his last conversation with The Market in late 2020. Today, his call for a big reflation trade has become the consensus on Wall Street.\nIn this new interview with The Market/NZZ, which has been edited and condensed for clarity, Larry McDonald tells why he expects the Federal Reserve to resort to yield curve control fairly soon and what that will mean for gold and silver. He also explains why the rotation into commodities and value stocks is only just beginning and where he currently sees the best opportunities for investments.\nAfter the turmoil of the past few weeks, all eyes are on the Federal Reserve. What can investors expect from Wednesday's Fed meeting?\n\nWe’re at a point where the market is moving way ahead of the Federal Reserve.The Fed is on «outcome-based guidance», but the beast, that serpent in the market, wants more than that. Basically, the market is saying: «The US economy is going to grow 6 or 7% this year, and that will force you to taper in Q3 or Q4.» As investors are pricing in a tapering of the Fed’s asset purchases, financial conditions are tightening; especially in emerging markets, where spreads on credit default swaps are rising. So far, financial conditions are nowhere near extremely dangerous levels. But the problem is everybody thinks we’re in a similar situation as back in 2018.\n\nWhat do you mean by that?\n\n Once again, the Fed is playing «Tough Guy»: The market demands a policy pivot, but the Fed is trying to hold on to its path, essentially signaling to investors: «No way, relax». We had a similar set-up in 2013, 2016 and 2018. These were the three most significant monetary policy shifts where market pressures broke the Fed's desired policy path.\n The problem is that back then the Fed had far more rope to play Tough Guy since the economy was stronger. In 2018 for instance, the US economy was creating hundreds of thousands of jobs a month. In contrast, today’s employment-to-population ratio is 3.5 percentage points below January 2020 levels. This means 13 million Americans are outside the labor force. To get back to pre-pandemic levels, the economy has to create more than 540,000 jobs a month for two years.\n\nSo what does this mean for this week's Fed meeting?\n\nThe Fed is planet earth’s central bank. Every time they tried to play Tough Guy, they’ve blown up the global economy.This time, the Fed's Tough Guy window is much smaller. In 2018 or 2013 that window was nine to ten months. Now, it’s like two months because the economy is so weak. If they let financial conditions tighten further, they risk a major default cycle.\n The negative multiplier effect of a stronger dollar is much higher to the world economy than the Fed anticipates. They can't afford to let the dollar rip higher, because there is so much dollar denominated debt in the world, so much trade tied to the Greenback. If they blow that up, it will just blow back to the US and force the Fed into a policy shift anyway. It’s like with an oil change at the car repair shop: You can pay now or you can pay later. That’s why the Fed has to pay now.\n\nWhy?\n\nThe Fed’s back is against the wall, all points to proactive action on March 17.They must suppress taper fears and cut these risks off, or else they blow up the global economy for the 4th time since 2013. We’re hearing that they’re already getting incoming calls from emerging market central banks right now. If Fed Chairman Jay Powell plays Tough Guy by staying with the current path, without offering further assurances of deeper, more sustainable accommodation, the beast inside the market will keep pushing him until he breaks. We will see a repeat of Q4 2018 and Q1 2019, where the Fed was forced into an utterly embarrassing pivot. One of those is enough for Powell’s legacy, he doesn’t want two.\n\nWhat kind of measures can be expected?\n\nEventually, we will get the taper, but the overwhelming point is other weapons have to come first.A Federal Reserve offering insufficient accommodation places markets in the crosshairs of a risk-off event. The first thing they will try to do is give some hard data points. For example, the US economy has to create 10 million jobs for the Fed to do anything on the balance sheet. Another way they can get out is calendar guidance, but that’s a more sophisticated weaponry. Bottom line, they should just say: «From now until the end of the year QE will continue at $120 billion a month, and we want PCE-inflation to get to between 2 and 2.5% and stay there for 24 months.» With that in place,\n all they have to do is open the door two or three inches for yield curve control, and they can contain the dollar.\n\nThe last time the Federal Reserve used yield curve control was during the time of World War II. Why would it resort to such a radical measure?\n\nHere’s the dirty little secret: Too many Treasury bonds are for sale.There aren’t enough buyers, and that will force the Fed to step in. More than $3.6 trillion of US government paper was issued in 2020 versus $2.9 trillion in the prior year. With the new $1.9 trillion fiscal package coming from Washington, issuance in 2021 is slated to rise to $4 trillion. That’s a lot more than the Fed’s Treasury purchases through QE, so the spread between QE and debt issuance gets much wider. Washington is doing so much fiscal stimulus, I’m confident that this is going to force the Fed into yield curve control by September. If that’s the case, it will pressure the dollar lower and put commodities, value stocks, global cyclicals, materials and emerging markets into rotation overdrive.\n\nHow come?\n\nYield curve control deployment is the tactical nuclear weaponry.If the Fed throws out yield curve control just as a threat, it will suppress Treasury rates and real yields will go much more negative. Over the last couple of months, the issuance has overpowered inflation expectations. Think of it as a car race: Treasury issuances were driving up yields faster than inflation expectations rose. But if the Fed starts to acknowledge that they are going to bring out new weapons like calendar guidance and yield curve control, then they’re suppressing nominal yields. So if inflation expectations continue to rise, then real yields go big negative – and that’s when gold and silver will take off. I think silver can double from here until early next year. Gold could be up 50%.\n\nHow can investors best position themselves in this environment?\n\n In terms of emerging markets, we’re\n long Chile and Brazil.In Asia, South Korea looks attractive. We also like the KWEB ETF which consists of the big Chinese tech stocks. In the commodity space, we have a position in the XME ETF which owns mainly\n copper and steel names.One of the best companies we own is Teck Resources. This stock is almost like a commodity mutual fund, because the company has exposure to copper, nickel and even energy. Another favorite is Mosaic because in a commodity cycle where you have weather problems around the world,\n agricultural plays are a good bet.\n\nWhat about precious metals?\n\nWhen it comes to precious metals, we love silver minerslike Hecla Mining. When the Fed eases its policy, the silver miners will outperform the underlying metal, and they will outperform gold because there is more leverage there.\n\nThe gold price is down more than 15% since its all-time high in August. What’s the problem?\n\nEveryone thinks it’s 2013, so taper fears are sky high for gold. But the Fed cannot repeat its mistakes.They must cap yields if they want to preserve the global economic recovery. Thus, the convexity with gold is very attractive. Every leg lower in real yields will act like a slingshot higher for gold. That’s why we love Newmont. The stock trades at 6x EBITDA with a 4% dividend yield which gives you some downside protection. And remember: The 2011-2016 commodity bust has made the balance sheet of these high quality gold mining companies a lot stronger.\n\nPresident Joe Biden has just signed off on a $1.9 trillion economic program. What are the chances of a second stimulus bill, aimed at infrastructure?\n\n It’s important to note that\n a second fiscal deal for 2021 is not a slam dunk.To pass the present $1.9 trillion stimulus bill, the Democrats used reconciliation. It’s a very special trick in US politics, because with reconciliation you don’t need 60 votes to pass a bill in the Senate. All you need is 50 votes. Yet, reconciliation has to be tied to a budget year. This means the next time the Democrats can use it is probably in the fourth quarter, late November or December, and tie it to the following year's budget. So the only way to do an infrastructure bill in the next six months is with a traditional piece of legislation.\n\nIs that even possible, given how wide the rift between Republicans and Democrats has opened in recent years?\n\n For that you need essentially ten Republicans. Right now, the centrists on the Hill, people like Mitt Romney on the Republican side or Joe Manchin on the Democrat side, are the most powerful people in Washington. They want to do an infrastructure program, but they want to finance it with tax revenue. They don’t believe in things like Modern Monetary Theory where the Fed is financing the deficit.\n So you are going to need a tax hike. And in this regard, we’re hearing they could go after some type of flat tax on the FAANGs, the big technology companies.\n\nWhat does this mean for Apple, Google, Facebook and other tech heavyweights?\n\n Keep in mind, we’re in a populist revolution:\n The risk of inequality leading to social unrest is high, and that puts pressure on politicians to pass bills to tax the rich.But a wealth tax is extremely complicated, it would take years. The simplest way to do something in terms of taxes is to tax larger companies. In the eighties, the top 100 companies in the US maintained about 45 to 50% of total profits. Today, the largest 20 companies command about 85 to 90%. In addition to that, close to 40% of the S&P 500’s market cap is related to tech. So tech is the low hanging fruit for the populists in Congress to go after.\n\nOne more reason why tech stocks remain under pressure?\n\n We run a bunch of models. For example, we look at Berkshire Hathaway’s share price versus the Nasdaq 100 or the Dow Jones Industrial versus the Nasdaq. March 8th was the second time in 2021 that the Nasdaq closed down 2% with the Dow closing higher.\n We haven’t seen this type of data since the dotcom crash. It’s a very rare event which historically coincides with a longer-term rotation out of technology stocks. That’s a very encouraging signal for value stocks.In this regard, we like the EWU ETF. It’s a wonderful basket of stocks because it’s full of financials and world class names like BP, Rio Tinto or Glencore. Officially, it’s called the United Kingdom ETF, but it’s more like a global value ETF.\n\nDoes this mean that the rotation towards cyclical stocks has only just begun?\n\nMany investors around the world are long a portfolio of stocks that was designed for the deflationary environment of the previous decade.The decade ahead of us - with all what’s ahead in terms of fiscal and monetary stimulus, populism, regulation and taxes - will push investors toward more globally value related stocks. That’s where the best returns are going to be.\n\nSo the previously successful «buy the dip» strategy of simply buying more tech stocks after every decline no longer works?\n\nThe potency of dip-buying is in decay mode.Global value is really starting to kick tech in the teeth, and when that happens, it wakes up what's called «real money». Keep in mind: There is fast money, mostly hedge funds which are nimble and make quick moves. In contrast, real money moves slowly. Those types of investors don’t make asset allocation decisions quickly. They base their decisions on committees and all kinds of meetings. As a result, tectonic plates are shifting beneath our feet. We’ve seen tremors after tremors where value is starting to crush growth, and now the earthquake is coming. At Bear Traps, we have a Bloomberg chat with 650 institutional investors, and I can tell just by these conversations, that the real money is starting to move.\n And when the real money moves, that’s when the big quake happens.\n\nWhat kind of dislocations will this cause?\n\nTech will probably be down 30 to 40% sometime between now and the end of October.Today, the market cap of the Nasdaq 100 is close to $12 trillion, but most large-cap tech stocks are unchanged since July last year, while commodity and value-related equities are up 20 to 50%. In the US, if you talk to a hundred high-net-worth families, every one of those families owns Apple, Google, Facebook and Amazon. But look what’s happening: Amazon’s stock is flat since the 4th of July 2020. That's $1.5 trillion of dead money. Last Friday, Amazon failed at the 200-day moving average again.\n This is like Mike Tyson getting defeated by Buster Douglas, one of the greatest upsets in sports history. This psychology is moving through the market, pushing the capital migration process into value and commodity plays.\n\nHowever, investments in commodities are mostly not compliant with the trend towards ESG standards; especially when it comes to CO2 emissions.\n\nThe best ESG trade on the board is nuclear power. The largest uranium company in the US is Cameco with a $7 market cap.Think about that relative to Elon Musk’s net worth! I support the Green New Deal, but this needs time, because solar and wind are still too far away to produce the amount of energy needed around the world, especially in India and China. The only way to meet that demand is through nuclear power. Uranium is coming out of a ten-year bear market, and it’s going into a massive new bull market. All the contracts between power plants and uranium producers are going to be adjusted. That’s why we like the URA ETF which owns companies like Cameco. I see some of these companies as six baggers: 500% upside potential and 30 to 40% downside risk, because uranium is still a risky commodity.\n\nIn our last conversation, you recommended investments in the energy sector. Since then, names such as Chevron, Royal Dutch Shell or Exxon Mobil have advanced 25 to 60%. What do you advise investors to do now?\n\nFor now, we’ve cut our energy book:We’ve sold half of our shares in Chevron, and we’ve sold two thirds of our positions in Exxon Mobil and in the XLE ETF. What happens when you get into the fourth, fifth and sixth innings of a commodity cycle, tertiary sectors like metallurgical coal become more attractive. Sure, met coal, also known as coking coal, is not ESG friendly, but there is no way around it for steel production and hence the construction of skyscrapers, bridges and things like that. So coming into this infrastructure boom all around the world, coal has plenty of upside. That’s why we own names like Arch Resources and Peabody Energy. They’re low-leveraged, and really cheap, once again, on a risk/reward basis.\n\nWhat are the biggest dangers to watch out for in the coming weeks and months?\n\nOne spot to watch are all these forbearance deals in commercial real estate.When we come out of Covid and the vaccines and the stimulus money are juicing through the economy, the market will be forcing the release of the forbearance on a lot of these loans. So if people don’t come back fast enough to the cities, these commercial real estate loans are going to get reset. This would mean some big defaults, and the banks own a lot of these loans. Also, a lot of leveraged loans are really rich. And then, there is potentially a fiscal cliff:\n The sustainability of the $1.9 trillion stimulus package isn’t that great because a lot of it is just transfer payments replacing lost income for people staying at home. That’s why the US needs a second stimulus bill. If we don’t get a second bill, we are going to have a problem in about a year from now.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":365,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":347141878,"gmtCreate":1618478236595,"gmtModify":1704711449720,"author":{"id":"3576336077780129","authorId":"3576336077780129","name":"moJoe","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/51b5f1e98cb521c4bd52447b0ea6e905","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576336077780129","authorIdStr":"3576336077780129"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Time to buy now.","listText":"Time to buy now.","text":"Time to buy now.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/347141878","repostId":"1141781678","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1141781678","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Stock Market Quotes, Business News, Financial News, Trading Ideas, and Stock Research by Professionals","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Benzinga","id":"1052270027","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa"},"pubTimestamp":1618476260,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1141781678?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-04-15 16:44","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Richard Branson Sheds Virgin Galactic Stake By $150M","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1141781678","media":"Benzinga","summary":"British billionaire Sir Richard Branson sold nearly $150 million worth shares of his space tourism c","content":"<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d808aa505915aef36af1dd03e578227f\" tg-width=\"1024\" tg-height=\"768\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>British billionaire Sir Richard Branson sold nearly $150 million worth shares of his space tourism company<b>Virgin Galactic Holdings Inc</b>SPCEover the course of three days, as per a regulatory filing.</p><p><b>What Happened:</b>Branson sold a total of 5,584,000 shares at an average price of $26.818&nbsp;between Monday and Wednesday. The stock sale comes a month after the company’s Chairman Chamath Palihapitiya sold the last of his personal stake in Virgin Galactic,freeingup another $21 million in cash.</p><p>After the sale, Branson owns 56.8 million shares in Virgin Galactic.</p><p>Virgin Galactic plans to fly people to space and back. It has collected deposits from 600 customers who have paid $250,000 each to board a Virgin Galactic flight to space in the future.</p><p>The company’s development delays have however pushed back the planned debut of its space tourism service until early 2022. The company expects to fly Branson to space later this year before beginning full commercial operations.</p><p>Last month, Virgin Galactic rolled outVSS Imagine, the second spacecraft in its fleet and crucial to its aim to offer 400 flights tourism flights annually to space and back.</p><p><b>Why It Matters:</b>The space tourism company had said last year Branson would sell up to $500 million worth of shares in Virgin Galactic to help his other businesses affected by the unprecedented impact of COVID-19.</p><p>Virgin Galactic completes with Elon Musk-led SpaceX, which earlier this yearannouncedplans for its first space mission with an all-civilian crew sometime in the fourth quarter of 2021.&nbsp;<b>Amazon.com Inc.</b>AMZNfounder and billionaire Jeff Bezos-backed Blue Origin has also been conducting test flights.</p><p><b>Price Action:</b>&nbsp;SPCE stock closed 0.74% lower at $26.68 on Wednesday.&nbsp;The company, whichwent public in October 2019, has seen its shares rise nearly 200% since its listing and are up 23% YTD.</p><p>Virgin Galactic fell nearly 4% in Thursday&nbsp;premarket trading.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/dcfae90a16b09ea91104d86bfe97c042\" tg-width=\"708\" tg-height=\"500\"></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Richard Branson Sheds Virgin Galactic Stake By $150M</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nRichard Branson Sheds Virgin Galactic Stake By $150M\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Benzinga </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-04-15 16:44</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d808aa505915aef36af1dd03e578227f\" tg-width=\"1024\" tg-height=\"768\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>British billionaire Sir Richard Branson sold nearly $150 million worth shares of his space tourism company<b>Virgin Galactic Holdings Inc</b>SPCEover the course of three days, as per a regulatory filing.</p><p><b>What Happened:</b>Branson sold a total of 5,584,000 shares at an average price of $26.818&nbsp;between Monday and Wednesday. The stock sale comes a month after the company’s Chairman Chamath Palihapitiya sold the last of his personal stake in Virgin Galactic,freeingup another $21 million in cash.</p><p>After the sale, Branson owns 56.8 million shares in Virgin Galactic.</p><p>Virgin Galactic plans to fly people to space and back. It has collected deposits from 600 customers who have paid $250,000 each to board a Virgin Galactic flight to space in the future.</p><p>The company’s development delays have however pushed back the planned debut of its space tourism service until early 2022. The company expects to fly Branson to space later this year before beginning full commercial operations.</p><p>Last month, Virgin Galactic rolled outVSS Imagine, the second spacecraft in its fleet and crucial to its aim to offer 400 flights tourism flights annually to space and back.</p><p><b>Why It Matters:</b>The space tourism company had said last year Branson would sell up to $500 million worth of shares in Virgin Galactic to help his other businesses affected by the unprecedented impact of COVID-19.</p><p>Virgin Galactic completes with Elon Musk-led SpaceX, which earlier this yearannouncedplans for its first space mission with an all-civilian crew sometime in the fourth quarter of 2021.&nbsp;<b>Amazon.com Inc.</b>AMZNfounder and billionaire Jeff Bezos-backed Blue Origin has also been conducting test flights.</p><p><b>Price Action:</b>&nbsp;SPCE stock closed 0.74% lower at $26.68 on Wednesday.&nbsp;The company, whichwent public in October 2019, has seen its shares rise nearly 200% since its listing and are up 23% YTD.</p><p>Virgin Galactic fell nearly 4% in Thursday&nbsp;premarket trading.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/dcfae90a16b09ea91104d86bfe97c042\" tg-width=\"708\" tg-height=\"500\"></p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SPCE":"维珍银河"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1141781678","content_text":"British billionaire Sir Richard Branson sold nearly $150 million worth shares of his space tourism companyVirgin Galactic Holdings IncSPCEover the course of three days, as per a regulatory filing.What Happened:Branson sold a total of 5,584,000 shares at an average price of $26.818 between Monday and Wednesday. The stock sale comes a month after the company’s Chairman Chamath Palihapitiya sold the last of his personal stake in Virgin Galactic,freeingup another $21 million in cash.After the sale, Branson owns 56.8 million shares in Virgin Galactic.Virgin Galactic plans to fly people to space and back. It has collected deposits from 600 customers who have paid $250,000 each to board a Virgin Galactic flight to space in the future.The company’s development delays have however pushed back the planned debut of its space tourism service until early 2022. The company expects to fly Branson to space later this year before beginning full commercial operations.Last month, Virgin Galactic rolled outVSS Imagine, the second spacecraft in its fleet and crucial to its aim to offer 400 flights tourism flights annually to space and back.Why It Matters:The space tourism company had said last year Branson would sell up to $500 million worth of shares in Virgin Galactic to help his other businesses affected by the unprecedented impact of COVID-19.Virgin Galactic completes with Elon Musk-led SpaceX, which earlier this yearannouncedplans for its first space mission with an all-civilian crew sometime in the fourth quarter of 2021. Amazon.com Inc.AMZNfounder and billionaire Jeff Bezos-backed Blue Origin has also been conducting test flights.Price Action: SPCE stock closed 0.74% lower at $26.68 on Wednesday. The company, whichwent public in October 2019, has seen its shares rise nearly 200% since its listing and are up 23% YTD.Virgin Galactic fell nearly 4% in Thursday premarket trading.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":583,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":358198103,"gmtCreate":1616670481002,"gmtModify":1704797161596,"author":{"id":"3576336077780129","authorId":"3576336077780129","name":"moJoe","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/51b5f1e98cb521c4bd52447b0ea6e905","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576336077780129","authorIdStr":"3576336077780129"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"No doubt. Tesla is the frontier of the technology.","listText":"No doubt. Tesla is the frontier of the technology.","text":"No doubt. Tesla is the frontier of the technology.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/358198103","repostId":"1170151822","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1170151822","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1616662406,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1170151822?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-03-25 16:53","market":"us","language":"en","title":"How Is Tesla Stock Worth $3,000? By Becoming Bigger Than Apple.","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1170151822","media":"Barrons","summary":"ARK Invest’s Cathie Wood says Tesla stock could be worth $3,000 in five years. How is that possible?By becoming bigger than Apple is now. Some of her assumptions, however, may be overly optimistic.Over the weekend, ARK Invest’s disruption guru Cathie Wood put a five-year price target of $3,000 on Tesla. That’s higher than Piper Sandler analyst Alex Potter’s $1,200 target, the highest on the Street, but analysts are usually looking out 12 months, not multiple years.Wood isn’t producing that targe","content":"<p>ARK Invest’s Cathie Wood says Tesla stock could be worth $3,000 in five years. How is that possible? By becoming bigger than Apple is now. Some of her assumptions, however, may be overly optimistic.</p>\n<p>Over the weekend, ARK Invest’s disruption guru Cathie Wood put a five-year price target of $3,000 on Tesla. That’s higher than Piper Sandler analyst Alex Potter’s $1,200 target, the highest on the Street, but analysts are usually looking out 12 months, not multiple years.</p>\n<p>Wood isn’t producing that target out of thin air. When she released it, she also produced some of the assumptions underlying her view. But one thing stands out: For Tesla to trade $3,000, it would have to produce more sales and more Ebitda—short for earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization—than Apple (AAPL) does now. Which makes sense, given that Tesla at $3,000 would be worth $3.6 trillion including management stock options, around 1.8 times&nbsp;the $2 trillion Apple is worth now.</p>\n<p>Overall, ARK expects Tesla to produce $700 billion in sales, $167 billion in cash flow, and $210 billion Ebitda by 2025. Apple generated about $274 billion in sales, $81 billion in operating cash flow, and $76 billion in Ebitda in its most recent fiscal year ended September 2020.</p>\n<p>The target, so far, hasn’t been the subject of a lot of critical analysis, beyond some angry tweets from Tesla (ticker: TSLA) bears. ARK didn’t respond to a request from&nbsp;<i>Barron’s</i>&nbsp;for comment about the new target price.</p>\n<p>To get there, Wood starts with the assumption that Tesla will sell between 5 million to 10 million cars by 2025. That’s a wide range. But a financial model is an average or best approximation of many assumptions. At the midpoint of ARK’s range, Tesla would sell about 7.5 million cars in 2025. That’s one area where ARK appears more bullish than most, including the company itself. It’s about three times higher than Wall Street is modeling and represents about 70% average annual growth. Tesla, for its part, is targeting 50% average annual growth in vehicle sales. It’s still a big number, but if Tesla grows at 50% then 2025 sales end up at about 3.8 million units in 2025.</p>\n<p>But the Bull case on Tesla is about more than auto sales.Autonomous taxis&nbsp;drive a big part of the ARK increased price target. ARK projects $327 billion in autonomous taxi revenue for 2025, almost as large as the vehicle business. Tesla’s car business is projected to generate roughly $90 billion in Ebitda, while the robotaxi business generates about $70 billion in Ebitda, according to the model. Today, however, autonomous taxis produce no revenue and no Ebitda at all yet.</p>\n<p>“Cathie is very bullish on robotaxis and many of Tesla’s next-generation endeavors, which could add another $500 per share to the stock in our opinion,” says Wedbush analyst Dan Ives.</p>\n<p>Still, some of the assumptions ARK uses to get to these numbers look a little generous. ARK assumes that Tesla’s working capital—all the inventory and accounts receivables along with short-term financing used to operate a business—in 2025 will be around $12 billion, roughly the same as 2020. It’s almost impossible that a car company manufacturing 15 times the number of vehicles it does today will have the same working capital requirements.</p>\n<p>That’s a smaller problem in the grand scheme of things, but it overstates the cash-generating ability of Tesla a little bit. ARK expects about $167 billion in “cash generation” by 2025. It isn’t clear if that is free cash flow or cash from operations. Either way, it’s a lot of cash, about two times the cash flow generated by Apple over the past 12 months</p>\n<p>ARK also assumes that Tesla’s insurance business, with all the autonomous driving data coming off its cars, will be able to produce twice the profit margins of traditional auto insurance companies. It’s not a huge part of Tesla’s business: ARK sees Tesla insurance generating about $2.5 billion in operating profit in 2025, just 1.25% of Ark’s $200 billion operating profit estimate for the company in 2025. Tesla generated about $2 billion in operating profit this past year.</p>\n<p>But Tesla won’t be the only one innovating. Even Elon Musk thinks other companies will have similar systems eventually. “Eventually, every car company will have long-range electric cars,” Musk said at the company’s recent annual shareholder meeting. “Eventually, every company will have autonomy, I think, but not every company will be great at manufacturing.”</p>\n<p>Whether ARK’s numbers seem realistic or like a hopeless pipe dream likely depends on where one stands on Tesla. If it’s a car company, its current $700 billion valuation looks extreme compared with&nbsp;Toyota&nbsp;(TM), the world’s second most valuable auto maker with a market cap of $250 billion, or&nbsp;Volkswagen&nbsp;(VOW.Germany), the world’s largest auto maker by the number of cars produced, which has a market cap of about $160 billion.</p>\n<p>ARK’s bet is that Tesla is something else altogether, something more like Apple. We’ll find out in 2025 if Wood is right.</p>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>How Is Tesla Stock Worth $3,000? By Becoming Bigger Than Apple.</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHow Is Tesla Stock Worth $3,000? By Becoming Bigger Than Apple.\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-03-25 16:53 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.barrons.com/articles/how-is-tesla-worth-3-000-by-becoming-bigger-than-apple-51616617173?mod=RTA><strong>Barrons</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>ARK Invest’s Cathie Wood says Tesla stock could be worth $3,000 in five years. How is that possible? By becoming bigger than Apple is now. Some of her assumptions, however, may be overly optimistic.\n...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/how-is-tesla-worth-3-000-by-becoming-bigger-than-apple-51616617173?mod=RTA\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉","AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/how-is-tesla-worth-3-000-by-becoming-bigger-than-apple-51616617173?mod=RTA","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1170151822","content_text":"ARK Invest’s Cathie Wood says Tesla stock could be worth $3,000 in five years. How is that possible? By becoming bigger than Apple is now. Some of her assumptions, however, may be overly optimistic.\nOver the weekend, ARK Invest’s disruption guru Cathie Wood put a five-year price target of $3,000 on Tesla. That’s higher than Piper Sandler analyst Alex Potter’s $1,200 target, the highest on the Street, but analysts are usually looking out 12 months, not multiple years.\nWood isn’t producing that target out of thin air. When she released it, she also produced some of the assumptions underlying her view. But one thing stands out: For Tesla to trade $3,000, it would have to produce more sales and more Ebitda—short for earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization—than Apple (AAPL) does now. Which makes sense, given that Tesla at $3,000 would be worth $3.6 trillion including management stock options, around 1.8 times the $2 trillion Apple is worth now.\nOverall, ARK expects Tesla to produce $700 billion in sales, $167 billion in cash flow, and $210 billion Ebitda by 2025. Apple generated about $274 billion in sales, $81 billion in operating cash flow, and $76 billion in Ebitda in its most recent fiscal year ended September 2020.\nThe target, so far, hasn’t been the subject of a lot of critical analysis, beyond some angry tweets from Tesla (ticker: TSLA) bears. ARK didn’t respond to a request from Barron’s for comment about the new target price.\nTo get there, Wood starts with the assumption that Tesla will sell between 5 million to 10 million cars by 2025. That’s a wide range. But a financial model is an average or best approximation of many assumptions. At the midpoint of ARK’s range, Tesla would sell about 7.5 million cars in 2025. That’s one area where ARK appears more bullish than most, including the company itself. It’s about three times higher than Wall Street is modeling and represents about 70% average annual growth. Tesla, for its part, is targeting 50% average annual growth in vehicle sales. It’s still a big number, but if Tesla grows at 50% then 2025 sales end up at about 3.8 million units in 2025.\nBut the Bull case on Tesla is about more than auto sales.Autonomous taxis drive a big part of the ARK increased price target. ARK projects $327 billion in autonomous taxi revenue for 2025, almost as large as the vehicle business. Tesla’s car business is projected to generate roughly $90 billion in Ebitda, while the robotaxi business generates about $70 billion in Ebitda, according to the model. Today, however, autonomous taxis produce no revenue and no Ebitda at all yet.\n“Cathie is very bullish on robotaxis and many of Tesla’s next-generation endeavors, which could add another $500 per share to the stock in our opinion,” says Wedbush analyst Dan Ives.\nStill, some of the assumptions ARK uses to get to these numbers look a little generous. ARK assumes that Tesla’s working capital—all the inventory and accounts receivables along with short-term financing used to operate a business—in 2025 will be around $12 billion, roughly the same as 2020. It’s almost impossible that a car company manufacturing 15 times the number of vehicles it does today will have the same working capital requirements.\nThat’s a smaller problem in the grand scheme of things, but it overstates the cash-generating ability of Tesla a little bit. ARK expects about $167 billion in “cash generation” by 2025. It isn’t clear if that is free cash flow or cash from operations. Either way, it’s a lot of cash, about two times the cash flow generated by Apple over the past 12 months\nARK also assumes that Tesla’s insurance business, with all the autonomous driving data coming off its cars, will be able to produce twice the profit margins of traditional auto insurance companies. It’s not a huge part of Tesla’s business: ARK sees Tesla insurance generating about $2.5 billion in operating profit in 2025, just 1.25% of Ark’s $200 billion operating profit estimate for the company in 2025. Tesla generated about $2 billion in operating profit this past year.\nBut Tesla won’t be the only one innovating. Even Elon Musk thinks other companies will have similar systems eventually. “Eventually, every car company will have long-range electric cars,” Musk said at the company’s recent annual shareholder meeting. “Eventually, every company will have autonomy, I think, but not every company will be great at manufacturing.”\nWhether ARK’s numbers seem realistic or like a hopeless pipe dream likely depends on where one stands on Tesla. If it’s a car company, its current $700 billion valuation looks extreme compared with Toyota (TM), the world’s second most valuable auto maker with a market cap of $250 billion, or Volkswagen (VOW.Germany), the world’s largest auto maker by the number of cars produced, which has a market cap of about $160 billion.\nARK’s bet is that Tesla is something else altogether, something more like Apple. We’ll find out in 2025 if Wood is right.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":556,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":353053430,"gmtCreate":1616436375220,"gmtModify":1704794141435,"author":{"id":"3576336077780129","authorId":"3576336077780129","name":"moJoe","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/51b5f1e98cb521c4bd52447b0ea6e905","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576336077780129","authorIdStr":"3576336077780129"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/EXPR\">$Express,(EXPR)$</a>easy does it.","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/EXPR\">$Express,(EXPR)$</a>easy does it.","text":"$Express,(EXPR)$easy does it.","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/eb327344468b82a0e2dcab3b722289c0","width":"1080","height":"1920"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/353053430","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":562,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":325483112,"gmtCreate":1615912849636,"gmtModify":1704788464414,"author":{"id":"3576336077780129","authorId":"3576336077780129","name":"moJoe","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/51b5f1e98cb521c4bd52447b0ea6e905","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576336077780129","authorIdStr":"3576336077780129"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Nxt big thing..","listText":"Nxt big thing..","text":"Nxt big thing..","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/325483112","repostId":"1178891078","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1178891078","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1615909549,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1178891078?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-03-16 23:45","market":"us","language":"en","title":"3 Cancer Diagnostic Stocks To Watch Following Roche's GenMark Buy","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1178891078","media":"Benzinga","summary":"Roche Holding AGRHHBY 0.17%acquiredGenMark Diagnostics, Inc(NASDAQ: GNMK) in a$1.8 billion deal on M","content":"<p><b>Roche Holding AG</b>RHHBY 0.17%acquired<b>GenMark Diagnostics, Inc</b>(NASDAQ:&nbsp;GNMK) in a$1.8 billion deal&nbsp;on Monday, the same day&nbsp;<b>Veracyte Inc</b>&nbsp;VCYT 1.76%announcedit completed the&nbsp;acquisition of<b>Decipher Biosciences, Inc.</b></p>\n<p><b>What Happened:</b>With thecancer diagnostic marketexpected to grow to $261.34 billion by 2027 — more than double the $115.60 billion it was worth last year — big biotech companies have been on an acquisition spree to boost their portfolios and&nbsp;technology.</p>\n<p>In January,&nbsp;<b>Exact Sciences Corporation</b>&nbsp;EXAS 3.64%announcedit completed its acquisition of<b>Thrive Earlier Detection Corp.</b>and&nbsp;got Thrive’s&nbsp;blood-based multi-cancer detection technology.</p>\n<p><b>Why It Matters:</b>Early detection of cancer greatly increases the survival rate and smaller biotech companies are showing leadership skills in developing the necessary technology.</p>\n<p>Smaller companies develop specific technology for specific types of cancer which allows them to focus on creating tailored products that are also&nbsp;attractive for larger companies&nbsp;to acquire.</p>\n<p>The following three companies have developed technology that could make them sought-after acquisition targets:</p>\n<p><b>BioMark&nbsp;Diagnostics Inc</b>BMKDF 13.17%, a biotech company headquartered in Vancouver, British Columbia, has developed a state-of-the-art liquid biopsy technology platform for the early detection of cancer. The unique technologyfinds metabolomicsbiomarkers of hard-to-detect cancers of the lung, brain, ovarian and pancreas.</p>\n<p>BioMark&nbsp;is pivoting into commercialization after many years in the research and development phase. On Feb. 16, the company&nbsp;announced&nbsp;it will collaborate with&nbsp;Phytronix&nbsp;Technologies Inc “to advance the development of&nbsp;BioMark’s&nbsp;early lung cancer screening applications using&nbsp;Phytronix-proprietary Laser Diode Thermal Desorption (LDTD) technology,”&nbsp;BioMark&nbsp;said in a press release.</p>\n<p>The collaboration will also support&nbsp;BioMark&nbsp;in setting up clinical lab services in Quebec.&nbsp;BioMark&nbsp;plans to demonstrate its technology later in 2021.</p>\n<p>BioMark’s&nbsp;market cap is $28.67 million and its shares are at 41 cents, up 13.17% on Tuesday morning.</p>\n<p><b>Biocept Inc</b>BIOC 0.17%is another company focusing on early cancer detection through blood-based liquid biopsy. The San Diego-based company has two platforms, CTC&nbsp;and&nbsp;ctDNA, used to detect and analyze a patient’s blood for cancer cells and mutations.</p>\n<p>Biocept boasts22 patentsfor its liquid-biopsy technology in the U.S., EU, Australia, China, Japan and South Korea.</p>\n<p>On Feb. 16, Bioceptannounced&nbsp;its product, Target Selector, is ultra-sensitive and capable of detecting mutations using biopsy specimens&nbsp;usually be deemed “quantity not sufficient.”</p>\n<p>In a pivot brought on by the pandemic, Biocept alsoannounced&nbsp;on Feb. 3&nbsp;its lab had processed 250 000 COVID-19 tests using its RT-PCR technology.</p>\n<p>Biocept has a market cap of $79.98 million and the company's&nbsp;shares are at $5.87, down 1.68% Tuesday morning.</p>\n<p><b>HTG Molecular Diagnostics Inc</b>HTGM 3.29%, an Arizona-based biotech company, developed the EdgeSeq&nbsp;Oncology Biomarker Panel to detect colon, breast, prostate and lung cancer from tumor tissue. The analysis tool can detect2,549 genesassociated with tumor biology and results are available only 36 hours following the biopsy collection.</p>\n<p>Unlike&nbsp;BioMark&nbsp;and Biocept, HTG Molecular uses Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded (FFPE) tissue specimens to test for cancers.</p>\n<p>On Feb. 26, HTG Molecularannouncedits&nbsp;EdgeSeq&nbsp;technology “demonstrated the ability to generate unique gene expression profiles for multiple cancer indications” and the amount of tissue required in the samples was 4 to 8 times less than required for similar tests.</p>\n<p>HTG Molecular has a market cap of $28.82 million and its shares area t $6.17, up 1.48% on Tuesday morning.</p>","source":"lsy1606299360108","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>3 Cancer Diagnostic Stocks To Watch Following Roche's GenMark Buy</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n3 Cancer Diagnostic Stocks To Watch Following Roche's GenMark Buy\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-03-16 23:45 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.benzinga.com/general/biotech/21/03/20187640/3-cancer-diagnostic-stocks-to-watch-following-roches-genmark-buy><strong>Benzinga</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Roche Holding AGRHHBY 0.17%acquiredGenMark Diagnostics, Inc(NASDAQ: GNMK) in a$1.8 billion deal on Monday, the same day Veracyte Inc VCYT 1.76%announcedit completed the acquisition ofDecipher ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.benzinga.com/general/biotech/21/03/20187640/3-cancer-diagnostic-stocks-to-watch-following-roches-genmark-buy\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.benzinga.com/general/biotech/21/03/20187640/3-cancer-diagnostic-stocks-to-watch-following-roches-genmark-buy","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1178891078","content_text":"Roche Holding AGRHHBY 0.17%acquiredGenMark Diagnostics, Inc(NASDAQ: GNMK) in a$1.8 billion deal on Monday, the same day Veracyte Inc VCYT 1.76%announcedit completed the acquisition ofDecipher Biosciences, Inc.\nWhat Happened:With thecancer diagnostic marketexpected to grow to $261.34 billion by 2027 — more than double the $115.60 billion it was worth last year — big biotech companies have been on an acquisition spree to boost their portfolios and technology.\nIn January, Exact Sciences Corporation EXAS 3.64%announcedit completed its acquisition ofThrive Earlier Detection Corp.and got Thrive’s blood-based multi-cancer detection technology.\nWhy It Matters:Early detection of cancer greatly increases the survival rate and smaller biotech companies are showing leadership skills in developing the necessary technology.\nSmaller companies develop specific technology for specific types of cancer which allows them to focus on creating tailored products that are also attractive for larger companies to acquire.\nThe following three companies have developed technology that could make them sought-after acquisition targets:\nBioMark Diagnostics IncBMKDF 13.17%, a biotech company headquartered in Vancouver, British Columbia, has developed a state-of-the-art liquid biopsy technology platform for the early detection of cancer. The unique technologyfinds metabolomicsbiomarkers of hard-to-detect cancers of the lung, brain, ovarian and pancreas.\nBioMark is pivoting into commercialization after many years in the research and development phase. On Feb. 16, the company announced it will collaborate with Phytronix Technologies Inc “to advance the development of BioMark’s early lung cancer screening applications using Phytronix-proprietary Laser Diode Thermal Desorption (LDTD) technology,” BioMark said in a press release.\nThe collaboration will also support BioMark in setting up clinical lab services in Quebec. BioMark plans to demonstrate its technology later in 2021.\nBioMark’s market cap is $28.67 million and its shares are at 41 cents, up 13.17% on Tuesday morning.\nBiocept IncBIOC 0.17%is another company focusing on early cancer detection through blood-based liquid biopsy. The San Diego-based company has two platforms, CTC and ctDNA, used to detect and analyze a patient’s blood for cancer cells and mutations.\nBiocept boasts22 patentsfor its liquid-biopsy technology in the U.S., EU, Australia, China, Japan and South Korea.\nOn Feb. 16, Bioceptannounced its product, Target Selector, is ultra-sensitive and capable of detecting mutations using biopsy specimens usually be deemed “quantity not sufficient.”\nIn a pivot brought on by the pandemic, Biocept alsoannounced on Feb. 3 its lab had processed 250 000 COVID-19 tests using its RT-PCR technology.\nBiocept has a market cap of $79.98 million and the company's shares are at $5.87, down 1.68% Tuesday morning.\nHTG Molecular Diagnostics IncHTGM 3.29%, an Arizona-based biotech company, developed the EdgeSeq Oncology Biomarker Panel to detect colon, breast, prostate and lung cancer from tumor tissue. The analysis tool can detect2,549 genesassociated with tumor biology and results are available only 36 hours following the biopsy collection.\nUnlike BioMark and Biocept, HTG Molecular uses Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded (FFPE) tissue specimens to test for cancers.\nOn Feb. 26, HTG Molecularannouncedits EdgeSeq technology “demonstrated the ability to generate unique gene expression profiles for multiple cancer indications” and the amount of tissue required in the samples was 4 to 8 times less than required for similar tests.\nHTG Molecular has a market cap of $28.82 million and its shares area t $6.17, up 1.48% on Tuesday morning.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":512,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":358903255,"gmtCreate":1616646181077,"gmtModify":1704796871392,"author":{"id":"3576336077780129","authorId":"3576336077780129","name":"moJoe","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/51b5f1e98cb521c4bd52447b0ea6e905","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576336077780129","authorIdStr":"3576336077780129"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"On my opinion and probably evertones, you havent lost anything until you sell your shares. So keep hodling the line dont budge. Diamond hands, hedge funds are felling the pinch..","listText":"On my opinion and probably evertones, you havent lost anything until you sell your shares. So keep hodling the line dont budge. Diamond hands, hedge funds are felling the pinch..","text":"On my opinion and probably evertones, you havent lost anything until you sell your shares. So keep hodling the line dont budge. Diamond hands, hedge funds are felling the pinch..","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/358903255","repostId":"1110970491","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1110970491","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1616632658,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1110970491?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-03-25 08:37","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Tech and GameStop losses have traders wondering if retail investors are losing interest in market","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1110970491","media":"cnbc","summary":"It was a bad day for Cathie Wood.\nAnd it was a very strange trading day.\nFor weeks, stocks have been","content":"<div>\n<p>It was a bad day for Cathie Wood.\nAnd it was a very strange trading day.\nFor weeks, stocks have been held hostage to Treasury yields, particularly the 10-year.  As yields moved up, stocks, ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/03/24/tech-and-gamestop-losses-have-traders-wondering-if-retail-investors-are-losing-interest-in-market.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"cnbc_highlight","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Tech and GameStop losses have traders wondering if retail investors are losing interest in market</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTech and GameStop losses have traders wondering if retail investors are losing interest in market\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-03-25 08:37 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.cnbc.com/2021/03/24/tech-and-gamestop-losses-have-traders-wondering-if-retail-investors-are-losing-interest-in-market.html><strong>cnbc</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>It was a bad day for Cathie Wood.\nAnd it was a very strange trading day.\nFor weeks, stocks have been held hostage to Treasury yields, particularly the 10-year.  As yields moved up, stocks, ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/03/24/tech-and-gamestop-losses-have-traders-wondering-if-retail-investors-are-losing-interest-in-market.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"GME":"游戏驿站"},"source_url":"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/03/24/tech-and-gamestop-losses-have-traders-wondering-if-retail-investors-are-losing-interest-in-market.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/72bb72e1b84c09fca865c6dcb1bbcd16","article_id":"1110970491","content_text":"It was a bad day for Cathie Wood.\nAnd it was a very strange trading day.\nFor weeks, stocks have been held hostage to Treasury yields, particularly the 10-year.  As yields moved up, stocks, particularly high-multiple megacap stocks, moved down.  If yields dropped, tech rallied.\nThat relationship has broken down.\nYields have been down three days in a row, yet tech did not react.\nMegacap tech like Facebook, Amazon, Apple, Micron, and Xilinx were down 1.5% to 3%.\nMore importantly, the market's favoritehigh-growth names got clobbered.\nWood'sARK Innovation Fund (ARKK), a bellwether for the big-growth tech crowd, was down 5% and is now 28% off the 52-week high it hit on February 16, which is just when interest rates starting moving up.\nArk Innovation Fund on Wednesday\n(largest holdings)\n\nCrispr  down 9%\nBaidu down 9%\nZoom down 7%\nRokudown 7%\nTeladoc down 6%.\n\n\"You'd think with all this stimulus, money would be pouring into Cathie Wood [funds], and it's just not happening,\" Josh Brown, CEO of Ritholtz Wealth Management, said on CNBC.\n Are retail traders losing interest?\nOne major surprise has been a pullback in volume.  The NYSE volume was 80% of the 30-day average, Nasdaq activity was 90% of the average, unusually low volume given the declines in certain sectors.\n\"Volume was heavy for Triple Witching last Friday, but Monday, Tuesday and today volumes have been light,\" Rich Repetto from Piper Sandler told me\nHave retail traders, who have been such a large part of the increase in volume last year, suddenly lost interest?\n\"It seems to show that the retail customer has walked away,\" Matt Maley from Miller Tabak told me.  \"The question is, why? Is it higher rates?  Concerns about lockdowns? Or are they betting on March Madness?\"\nAnother example:  Reddit favorite GameStop wasdown all day on disappointing earningsbut collapsed going into the close, down 33%. But only 23 million shares changed hands, well short of the 30-day average of 34 million shares.\nLow volume on a big down day implies not a lot of owners interested in selling, but also not many buyers interested in purchasing, even with shares down over 30%.\nSame with another Reddit-crowd favorite:  AMC, down 15% on volume two-thirds of its average.\nIs Cathie Wood the key?\nFor the high-beta, high-growth, high-momentum crowd, watching Wood has been an obsession.  Maley says the flagship Ark Innovation fund is now set up for a key technical test.\n\n\"The closing low for ARK was $110.26 on March 8th,\" he told me.  It bounced nicely off of that, but has been trending down for the last week, Maley noted.\n\"It closed today at $114. If it drops below that $110 level, that will be very negative on a technical basis,\" with the trader noting that a \"lower low\" is usually a negative indicator.\n\"If buy on weakness doesn't work this time, that is going to worry a lot of people,\" Maley said.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":532,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":327922184,"gmtCreate":1616052905248,"gmtModify":1704790247017,"author":{"id":"3576336077780129","authorId":"3576336077780129","name":"moJoe","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/51b5f1e98cb521c4bd52447b0ea6e905","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576336077780129","authorIdStr":"3576336077780129"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"You beauty...","listText":"You beauty...","text":"You beauty...","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/327922184","repostId":"1138187457","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1138187457","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Stock Market Quotes, Business News, Financial News, Trading Ideas, and Stock Research by Professionals","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Benzinga","id":"1052270027","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa"},"pubTimestamp":1616052603,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1138187457?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-03-18 15:30","market":"us","language":"en","title":"AMC Shares Spike On Complete Reopening Optimism: What You Need To Know","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1138187457","media":"Benzinga","summary":"Shares of AMC Entertainment Holdings Inc. climbed almost 4% in extended trading on Wednesday after t","content":"<p>Shares of&nbsp;<b>AMC Entertainment Holdings Inc.</b>&nbsp;climbed almost 4% in extended trading on Wednesday after the movie theatre chainsaid98% of its U.S. locations will be open beginning Friday.</p>\n<p><b>What Happened:</b>With additional openings in the U.S. expected over the next week, AMC expects 99% of its U.S. circuit will be open by March 26.</p>\n<p>More than 40 AMC locations in California will reopen beginning Friday, including all 25 locations in Los Angeles County and all eight locations in San Diego County.</p>\n<p>The company expects 52 of its 54 California locations to be open by Monday including two brand new theatres in the Los Angeles area that will be serving guests for the first time ever.</p>\n<p>AMC Porter Ranch 9 at the Vineyards at Porter Ranch will open on Friday, March 19. AMC DINE-IN Montclair Place 12, the company’s newest dine-in location will open for the first time on Monday.</p>\n<p><b>Why It Matters:</b>AMC and other movie chains have been struggling following the closure of theatres amid the pandemic. The company now expects the rollout of Covid-19 vaccines in the U.S. and the release of blockbuster movie titles in the coming months to boost sales this year.</p>\n<p>It was&nbsp;reported&nbsp;last week that AMC is likely getting discounts on film-rental fees from&nbsp;<b>AT&amp;T Inc.’s</b>&nbsp;Tsubsidiary WarnerMedia. A discount on film-rental fees, which usually account for a huge share of a theatre chain’s costs, could boost AMC’s gross margins while it struggles with a&nbsp;cash crunch.</p>\n<p>Nevertheless, AMC’s stock has been popular among retail investors and surged in January along with other heavily-shorted stocks such as&nbsp;<b>GameStop Corp.</b>. These so-called meme stocks continue to see high retail investor interest in March, including from the Reddit community&nbsp;r/WallStreetBets.</p>\n<p><b>Price Action:</b>AMC Entertainment shares closed 4.2% higher on Wednesday at $13.56 and further rose 3.8% in the after-hours session.</p>\n<p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>AMC Shares Spike On Complete Reopening Optimism: What You Need To Know</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAMC Shares Spike On Complete Reopening Optimism: What You Need To Know\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Benzinga </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-03-18 15:30</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Shares of&nbsp;<b>AMC Entertainment Holdings Inc.</b>&nbsp;climbed almost 4% in extended trading on Wednesday after the movie theatre chainsaid98% of its U.S. locations will be open beginning Friday.</p>\n<p><b>What Happened:</b>With additional openings in the U.S. expected over the next week, AMC expects 99% of its U.S. circuit will be open by March 26.</p>\n<p>More than 40 AMC locations in California will reopen beginning Friday, including all 25 locations in Los Angeles County and all eight locations in San Diego County.</p>\n<p>The company expects 52 of its 54 California locations to be open by Monday including two brand new theatres in the Los Angeles area that will be serving guests for the first time ever.</p>\n<p>AMC Porter Ranch 9 at the Vineyards at Porter Ranch will open on Friday, March 19. AMC DINE-IN Montclair Place 12, the company’s newest dine-in location will open for the first time on Monday.</p>\n<p><b>Why It Matters:</b>AMC and other movie chains have been struggling following the closure of theatres amid the pandemic. The company now expects the rollout of Covid-19 vaccines in the U.S. and the release of blockbuster movie titles in the coming months to boost sales this year.</p>\n<p>It was&nbsp;reported&nbsp;last week that AMC is likely getting discounts on film-rental fees from&nbsp;<b>AT&amp;T Inc.’s</b>&nbsp;Tsubsidiary WarnerMedia. A discount on film-rental fees, which usually account for a huge share of a theatre chain’s costs, could boost AMC’s gross margins while it struggles with a&nbsp;cash crunch.</p>\n<p>Nevertheless, AMC’s stock has been popular among retail investors and surged in January along with other heavily-shorted stocks such as&nbsp;<b>GameStop Corp.</b>. These so-called meme stocks continue to see high retail investor interest in March, including from the Reddit community&nbsp;r/WallStreetBets.</p>\n<p><b>Price Action:</b>AMC Entertainment shares closed 4.2% higher on Wednesday at $13.56 and further rose 3.8% in the after-hours session.</p>\n<p></p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AMC":"AMC院线"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1138187457","content_text":"Shares of AMC Entertainment Holdings Inc. climbed almost 4% in extended trading on Wednesday after the movie theatre chainsaid98% of its U.S. locations will be open beginning Friday.\nWhat Happened:With additional openings in the U.S. expected over the next week, AMC expects 99% of its U.S. circuit will be open by March 26.\nMore than 40 AMC locations in California will reopen beginning Friday, including all 25 locations in Los Angeles County and all eight locations in San Diego County.\nThe company expects 52 of its 54 California locations to be open by Monday including two brand new theatres in the Los Angeles area that will be serving guests for the first time ever.\nAMC Porter Ranch 9 at the Vineyards at Porter Ranch will open on Friday, March 19. AMC DINE-IN Montclair Place 12, the company’s newest dine-in location will open for the first time on Monday.\nWhy It Matters:AMC and other movie chains have been struggling following the closure of theatres amid the pandemic. The company now expects the rollout of Covid-19 vaccines in the U.S. and the release of blockbuster movie titles in the coming months to boost sales this year.\nIt was reported last week that AMC is likely getting discounts on film-rental fees from AT&T Inc.’s Tsubsidiary WarnerMedia. A discount on film-rental fees, which usually account for a huge share of a theatre chain’s costs, could boost AMC’s gross margins while it struggles with a cash crunch.\nNevertheless, AMC’s stock has been popular among retail investors and surged in January along with other heavily-shorted stocks such as GameStop Corp.. These so-called meme stocks continue to see high retail investor interest in March, including from the Reddit community r/WallStreetBets.\nPrice Action:AMC Entertainment shares closed 4.2% higher on Wednesday at $13.56 and further rose 3.8% in the after-hours session.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":230,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":323554310,"gmtCreate":1615359870630,"gmtModify":1704781635443,"author":{"id":"3576336077780129","authorId":"3576336077780129","name":"moJoe","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/51b5f1e98cb521c4bd52447b0ea6e905","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576336077780129","authorIdStr":"3576336077780129"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">$Tesla Motors(TSLA)$</a>yeah baby","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">$Tesla Motors(TSLA)$</a>yeah baby","text":"$Tesla Motors(TSLA)$yeah baby","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/323554310","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":271,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":353846028,"gmtCreate":1616486197564,"gmtModify":1704794694360,"author":{"id":"3576336077780129","authorId":"3576336077780129","name":"moJoe","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/51b5f1e98cb521c4bd52447b0ea6e905","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576336077780129","authorIdStr":"3576336077780129"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Im watching..","listText":"Im watching..","text":"Im watching..","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/353846028","repostId":"1108931651","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1108931651","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1616555765,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1108931651?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-03-24 11:16","market":"us","language":"en","title":"These Stocks Are More of a Gamble Than an Investment — and the #1 Is a Reddit Favorite","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1108931651","media":"Barrons","summary":"As with seemingly everything in markets these days, it all ties back to the Reddit Wall Street Bets message board.No, we’re not talking aboutGameStop. Rather, Castor Maritime . The dry-bulk commodities transportation firm was trading around 20 cents earlier this year until it was swept up in momentum as users of the message board recommended the company, sending shares as high as $1.95.The stock was identified as a potential gamble using methodology from recently published research paper—from Al","content":"<p>As with seemingly everything in markets these days, it all ties back to the Reddit Wall Street Bets message board.</p><p>No, we’re not talking aboutGameStop(ticker: GME). Rather, Castor Maritime (CTRM). The dry-bulk commodities transportation firm was trading around 20 cents earlier this year until it was swept up in momentum as users of the message board recommended the company, sending shares as high as $1.95.</p><p>The stock was identified as a potential gamble using methodology from recently published research paper—from Alok Kumar of the University of Miami, Houng Nguyen of the University of Danang, and Talis Putnins at the University of Technology Sydney and Stockholm School of Economics. The group proposed looking at the average volume over 30 days compared to market cap as a way of determining what they called lottery stocks. “We assume that gambling in stock markets involves disproportionate amount of trading in lottery-like stocks,” they said.</p><p>Castor topped the research group’s list of New York Stock Exchange- and Nasdaq-listed companies that were potential “lottery stocks.”<i>Barron’s</i>added to a filter to the list to look at companies with market caps of at least $500 million andpublished the listin January.</p><p>We ran our version of that screen again this month. Castor Maritime topped our list this time.</p><p>Sundial Growers(SNDL), the cannabis stock, andGenius Brands International(GNUS), the children’s media company, appear high on the list too. The top NYSE-listed stock wasAMC Entertainment(AMC), the movie chain operator that, with GameStop, became a poster-child for theso-called meme stock revolution.</p><p>And what about&nbsp;GameStop&nbsp;itself? It’s not in the top 20, but the methodology does put the video-games retailer high: Out of more than 3,000 stocks, GameStop ranks 128th as a lottery stock.</p><p>The stock scoring lowest in the lottery stock rankings was Google owner&nbsp;Alphabet(GOOGL).</p><table><tbody><tr><td>Ranking</td><td>Company</td></tr><tr><td>1.</td><td>Castor Maritime</td></tr><tr><td>2.</td><td>Sundial Growers</td></tr><tr><td>3.</td><td>Genius Brands International</td></tr><tr><td>4.</td><td>TherapeuticsMD</td></tr><tr><td>5.</td><td>Ideanomics</td></tr><tr><td>6.</td><td>AMC Entertainment</td></tr><tr><td>7.</td><td>Ocugen</td></tr><tr><td>8.</td><td>Ebang International Holdings</td></tr><tr><td>9.</td><td>ElectraMeccanica Vehicles</td></tr><tr><td>10.</td><td>Workhorse Group</td></tr><tr><td>11.</td><td>Jiayin Group</td></tr><tr><td>12.</td><td>Invesco Mortgage Capital</td></tr><tr><td>13.</td><td>ChromaDex</td></tr><tr><td>14.</td><td>Transocean</td></tr><tr><td>15.</td><td>Gevo</td></tr><tr><td>16.</td><td>Bionano Genomics</td></tr><tr><td>17.</td><td>Clovis Oncology</td></tr><tr><td>18.</td><td>Nano Dimension</td></tr><tr><td>19.</td><td>W&amp;T Offshore</td></tr><tr><td>20.</td><td>Tellurian</td></tr><tr><td>Source: FactSet</td></tr></tbody></table><p></p><p></p>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>These Stocks Are More of a Gamble Than an Investment — and the #1 Is a Reddit Favorite</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nThese Stocks Are More of a Gamble Than an Investment — and the #1 Is a Reddit Favorite\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-03-24 11:16 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.barrons.com/articles/these-stocks-are-more-of-a-gamble-than-an-investment-and-the-1-is-a-reddit-favorite-51616401800?mod=hp_LEADSUPP_2><strong>Barrons</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>As with seemingly everything in markets these days, it all ties back to the Reddit Wall Street Bets message board.No, we’re not talking aboutGameStop(ticker: GME). Rather, Castor Maritime (CTRM). The ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/these-stocks-are-more-of-a-gamble-than-an-investment-and-the-1-is-a-reddit-favorite-51616401800?mod=hp_LEADSUPP_2\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"RIG":"Transocean Ltd.","GEVO":"Gevo Inc.","CDXC":"Chromadex Corporation","BNGO":"Bionano Genomics","TELL":"Tellurian Inc.","AMC":"AMC院线","TXMD":"TherapeuticsMD Inc.","SNDL":"SNDL Inc.","EBON":"亿邦国际","NNDM":"Nano Dimension Ltd.","WTI":"W&T海底钻探","SOLO":"Electrameccanica Vehicles Corp.","IVR":"景顺抵押资本","CLVS":"Clovis Oncology","JFIN":"嘉银科技","CTRM":"Castor Maritime, Inc."},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/these-stocks-are-more-of-a-gamble-than-an-investment-and-the-1-is-a-reddit-favorite-51616401800?mod=hp_LEADSUPP_2","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1108931651","content_text":"As with seemingly everything in markets these days, it all ties back to the Reddit Wall Street Bets message board.No, we’re not talking aboutGameStop(ticker: GME). Rather, Castor Maritime (CTRM). The dry-bulk commodities transportation firm was trading around 20 cents earlier this year until it was swept up in momentum as users of the message board recommended the company, sending shares as high as $1.95.The stock was identified as a potential gamble using methodology from recently published research paper—from Alok Kumar of the University of Miami, Houng Nguyen of the University of Danang, and Talis Putnins at the University of Technology Sydney and Stockholm School of Economics. The group proposed looking at the average volume over 30 days compared to market cap as a way of determining what they called lottery stocks. “We assume that gambling in stock markets involves disproportionate amount of trading in lottery-like stocks,” they said.Castor topped the research group’s list of New York Stock Exchange- and Nasdaq-listed companies that were potential “lottery stocks.”Barron’sadded to a filter to the list to look at companies with market caps of at least $500 million andpublished the listin January.We ran our version of that screen again this month. Castor Maritime topped our list this time.Sundial Growers(SNDL), the cannabis stock, andGenius Brands International(GNUS), the children’s media company, appear high on the list too. The top NYSE-listed stock wasAMC Entertainment(AMC), the movie chain operator that, with GameStop, became a poster-child for theso-called meme stock revolution.And what about GameStop itself? It’s not in the top 20, but the methodology does put the video-games retailer high: Out of more than 3,000 stocks, GameStop ranks 128th as a lottery stock.The stock scoring lowest in the lottery stock rankings was Google owner Alphabet(GOOGL).RankingCompany1.Castor Maritime2.Sundial Growers3.Genius Brands International4.TherapeuticsMD5.Ideanomics6.AMC Entertainment7.Ocugen8.Ebang International Holdings9.ElectraMeccanica Vehicles10.Workhorse Group11.Jiayin Group12.Invesco Mortgage Capital13.ChromaDex14.Transocean15.Gevo16.Bionano Genomics17.Clovis Oncology18.Nano Dimension19.W&T Offshore20.TellurianSource: FactSet","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":745,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":325890062,"gmtCreate":1615883601556,"gmtModify":1704787877393,"author":{"id":"3576336077780129","authorId":"3576336077780129","name":"moJoe","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/51b5f1e98cb521c4bd52447b0ea6e905","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576336077780129","authorIdStr":"3576336077780129"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hold and buy more gamestop..","listText":"Hold and buy more gamestop..","text":"Hold and buy more gamestop..","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/325890062","repostId":"2119945399","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2119945399","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1615882664,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2119945399?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-03-16 16:17","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Is Paypal Holdings (PYPL) Stock A Buy Or Sell?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2119945399","media":"Insider Monkey","summary":"We know that hedge funds generate strong, risk-adjusted returns over the long run, therefore imitati","content":"<p>We know that hedge funds generate strong, risk-adjusted returns over the long run, therefore imitating the picks that they are collectively bullish on can be a profitable strategy for retail investors. With billions of dollars in assets, smart money investors have to conduct complex analyses, spend many resources and use tools that are not always available for the general crowd. This doesn't mean that they don't have occasional colossal losses; they do (like Melvin Capital's recent GameStop losses). However, it is still a good idea to keep an eye on hedge fund activity. With this in mind, as the current round of 13F filings has just ended, let’s examine the smart money sentiment towards Paypal Holdings Inc (NASDAQ:PYPL).</p>\n<p><b>Is PYPL stock a buy or sell?</b> Paypal Holdings Inc (NASDAQ:PYPL) was in 147 hedge funds' portfolios at the end of the fourth quarter of 2020. The all time high for this statistic is 150. PYPL has seen a decrease in hedge fund sentiment in recent months. There were 150 hedge funds in our database with PYPL holdings at the end of September. Our calculations also showed that PYPL ranked 10th among the 30 most popular stocks among hedge funds (click for Q4 rankings).</p>\n<p>Why do we pay any attention at all to hedge fund sentiment? Our research has shown that a select group of hedge fund holdings outperformed the S&amp;P 500 ETFs by 124 percentage points since March 2017 (see the details here). We were also able to identify in advance a select group of hedge fund holdings that'll significantly underperform the market. We have been tracking and sharing the list of these stocks since February 2017 and they lost 13% through November 17th. That's why we believe hedge fund sentiment is an extremely useful indicator that investors should pay attention to.</p>\n<p>At Insider Monkey we leave no stone unturned when looking for the next great investment idea. For example, lithium mining is <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE\">one</a> of the fastest growing industries right now, so we are checking out stock pitches like this <b>emerging lithium stock</b>. We go through lists like the 10 best hydrogen fuel cell stocks&nbsp;to pick the next Tesla that will deliver a 10x return. Even though we recommend positions in only a tiny fraction of the companies we analyze, we check out as many stocks as we can. We read hedge fund investor letters and listen to stock pitches at hedge fund conferences. You can subscribe to our free daily newsletter on&nbsp;our homepage&nbsp;(or at the end of this article).&nbsp;Keeping this in mind we're going to review the recent hedge fund action surrounding Paypal Holdings Inc (NASDAQ:PYPL).</p>\n<h2>Do Hedge Funds Think PYPL Is A Good Stock To Buy Now?</h2>\n<p>Heading into the first quarter of 2021, a total of 147 of the hedge funds tracked by Insider Monkey were bullish on this stock, a change of -2% from the third quarter of 2020. The graph below displays the number of hedge funds with bullish position in PYPL over the last 22 quarters. So, let's review which hedge funds were among the top holders of the stock and which hedge funds were making big moves.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6e650c2fb8717c617f984ff96a9bbdce\" tg-width=\"678\" tg-height=\"431\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>Among these funds, Fundsmith LLP held the most valuable stake in Paypal Holdings Inc (NASDAQ:PYPL), which was worth $2888.6 million at the end of the fourth quarter. On the second spot was Fisher Asset Management which amassed $2501.4 million worth of shares. Coatue Management, SB Management, and Egerton Capital Limited were also very fond of the stock, becoming <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> of the largest hedge fund holders of the company. In terms of the portfolio weights assigned to each position Portland Hill Asset Management allocated the biggest weight to Paypal Holdings Inc (NASDAQ:PYPL), around 12.98% of its 13F portfolio. Aravt Global is also relatively very bullish on the stock, designating 12.6 percent of its 13F equity portfolio to PYPL.</p>\n<p>Seeing as Paypal Holdings Inc (NASDAQ:PYPL) has faced falling interest from the aggregate hedge fund industry, it's safe to say that there is a sect of hedgies that elected to cut their entire stakes by the end of the fourth quarter. Interestingly, Lone Pine Capital cut the largest investment of all the hedgies monitored by Insider Monkey, worth an estimated $1182.4 million in stock, and Gabriel Plotkin's Melvin Capital Management was right behind this move, as the fund cut about $137.9 million worth. These transactions are important to note, as total hedge fund interest dropped by 3 funds by the end of the fourth quarter.</p>\n<p>Let's check out hedge fund activity in other stocks similar to Paypal Holdings Inc (NASDAQ:PYPL). We will take a look at salesforce.com, inc. (NYSE:CRM), The Walt Disney Company (NYSE:DIS), <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NFLX\">Netflix, Inc.</a> (NASDAQ:NFLX), Intel Corporation (NASDAQ:INTC), The Coca-Cola Company (NYSE:KO), Comcast Corporation (NASDAQ:CMCSA), and Merck &amp; Co., Inc. (NYSE:MRK). All of these stocks' market caps resemble PYPL's market cap.</p>\n<p>[table] Ticker, No of HFs with positions, Total Value of HF Positions (x1000), Change in HF Position CRM,97,10576035,-9 DIS,144,16417240,32 NFLX,116,15633343,12 INTC,72,5578824,6 KO,62,24683372,2 CMCSA,84,8831767,2 MRK,82,7171072,2 Average,93.9,12698808,6.7 [/table]</p>\n<p>View table here&nbsp;if you experience formatting issues.</p>\n<p>As you can see these stocks had an average of 93.9 hedge funds with bullish positions and the average amount invested in these stocks was $12699 million. That figure was $15961 million in PYPL's case. The Walt Disney Company (NYSE:DIS) is the most popular stock in this table. On the other hand The Coca-Cola Company (NYSE:KO) is the least popular one with only 62 bullish hedge fund positions. Compared to these stocks Paypal Holdings Inc (NASDAQ:PYPL) is more popular among hedge funds. Our overall hedge fund sentiment score for PYPL is 96. Stocks with higher number of hedge fund positions relative to other stocks as well as relative to their historical range receive a higher sentiment score. Our calculations showed that top 30 most popular stocks among hedge funds returned 81.2% in 2019 and 2020, and outperformed the S&amp;P 500 ETF (SPY) by 26 percentage points. These stocks gained 7% in 2021 through March 12th and still beat the market by 1.6 percentage points. Hedge funds were also right about PYPL as the stock returned 6.9% since the end of the fourth quarter (through 3/12) and outperformed the market. If you are interested in investing in large cap stocks with huge upside potential, you should check out the top 30 most popular stocks among hedge funds as most of these stocks already outperformed the market since 2019.</p>","source":"lsy1606273129822","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Is Paypal Holdings (PYPL) Stock A Buy Or Sell?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nIs Paypal Holdings (PYPL) Stock A Buy Or Sell?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-03-16 16:17 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.insidermonkey.com/blog/is-paypal-holdings-pypl-stock-a-buy-or-sell-924298/><strong>Insider Monkey</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>We know that hedge funds generate strong, risk-adjusted returns over the long run, therefore imitating the picks that they are collectively bullish on can be a profitable strategy for retail investors...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.insidermonkey.com/blog/is-paypal-holdings-pypl-stock-a-buy-or-sell-924298/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"PYPL":"PayPal"},"source_url":"https://www.insidermonkey.com/blog/is-paypal-holdings-pypl-stock-a-buy-or-sell-924298/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2119945399","content_text":"We know that hedge funds generate strong, risk-adjusted returns over the long run, therefore imitating the picks that they are collectively bullish on can be a profitable strategy for retail investors. With billions of dollars in assets, smart money investors have to conduct complex analyses, spend many resources and use tools that are not always available for the general crowd. This doesn't mean that they don't have occasional colossal losses; they do (like Melvin Capital's recent GameStop losses). However, it is still a good idea to keep an eye on hedge fund activity. With this in mind, as the current round of 13F filings has just ended, let’s examine the smart money sentiment towards Paypal Holdings Inc (NASDAQ:PYPL).\nIs PYPL stock a buy or sell? Paypal Holdings Inc (NASDAQ:PYPL) was in 147 hedge funds' portfolios at the end of the fourth quarter of 2020. The all time high for this statistic is 150. PYPL has seen a decrease in hedge fund sentiment in recent months. There were 150 hedge funds in our database with PYPL holdings at the end of September. Our calculations also showed that PYPL ranked 10th among the 30 most popular stocks among hedge funds (click for Q4 rankings).\nWhy do we pay any attention at all to hedge fund sentiment? Our research has shown that a select group of hedge fund holdings outperformed the S&P 500 ETFs by 124 percentage points since March 2017 (see the details here). We were also able to identify in advance a select group of hedge fund holdings that'll significantly underperform the market. We have been tracking and sharing the list of these stocks since February 2017 and they lost 13% through November 17th. That's why we believe hedge fund sentiment is an extremely useful indicator that investors should pay attention to.\nAt Insider Monkey we leave no stone unturned when looking for the next great investment idea. For example, lithium mining is one of the fastest growing industries right now, so we are checking out stock pitches like this emerging lithium stock. We go through lists like the 10 best hydrogen fuel cell stocks to pick the next Tesla that will deliver a 10x return. Even though we recommend positions in only a tiny fraction of the companies we analyze, we check out as many stocks as we can. We read hedge fund investor letters and listen to stock pitches at hedge fund conferences. You can subscribe to our free daily newsletter on our homepage (or at the end of this article). Keeping this in mind we're going to review the recent hedge fund action surrounding Paypal Holdings Inc (NASDAQ:PYPL).\nDo Hedge Funds Think PYPL Is A Good Stock To Buy Now?\nHeading into the first quarter of 2021, a total of 147 of the hedge funds tracked by Insider Monkey were bullish on this stock, a change of -2% from the third quarter of 2020. The graph below displays the number of hedge funds with bullish position in PYPL over the last 22 quarters. So, let's review which hedge funds were among the top holders of the stock and which hedge funds were making big moves.\n\nAmong these funds, Fundsmith LLP held the most valuable stake in Paypal Holdings Inc (NASDAQ:PYPL), which was worth $2888.6 million at the end of the fourth quarter. On the second spot was Fisher Asset Management which amassed $2501.4 million worth of shares. Coatue Management, SB Management, and Egerton Capital Limited were also very fond of the stock, becoming one of the largest hedge fund holders of the company. In terms of the portfolio weights assigned to each position Portland Hill Asset Management allocated the biggest weight to Paypal Holdings Inc (NASDAQ:PYPL), around 12.98% of its 13F portfolio. Aravt Global is also relatively very bullish on the stock, designating 12.6 percent of its 13F equity portfolio to PYPL.\nSeeing as Paypal Holdings Inc (NASDAQ:PYPL) has faced falling interest from the aggregate hedge fund industry, it's safe to say that there is a sect of hedgies that elected to cut their entire stakes by the end of the fourth quarter. Interestingly, Lone Pine Capital cut the largest investment of all the hedgies monitored by Insider Monkey, worth an estimated $1182.4 million in stock, and Gabriel Plotkin's Melvin Capital Management was right behind this move, as the fund cut about $137.9 million worth. These transactions are important to note, as total hedge fund interest dropped by 3 funds by the end of the fourth quarter.\nLet's check out hedge fund activity in other stocks similar to Paypal Holdings Inc (NASDAQ:PYPL). We will take a look at salesforce.com, inc. (NYSE:CRM), The Walt Disney Company (NYSE:DIS), Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ:NFLX), Intel Corporation (NASDAQ:INTC), The Coca-Cola Company (NYSE:KO), Comcast Corporation (NASDAQ:CMCSA), and Merck & Co., Inc. (NYSE:MRK). All of these stocks' market caps resemble PYPL's market cap.\n[table] Ticker, No of HFs with positions, Total Value of HF Positions (x1000), Change in HF Position CRM,97,10576035,-9 DIS,144,16417240,32 NFLX,116,15633343,12 INTC,72,5578824,6 KO,62,24683372,2 CMCSA,84,8831767,2 MRK,82,7171072,2 Average,93.9,12698808,6.7 [/table]\nView table here if you experience formatting issues.\nAs you can see these stocks had an average of 93.9 hedge funds with bullish positions and the average amount invested in these stocks was $12699 million. That figure was $15961 million in PYPL's case. The Walt Disney Company (NYSE:DIS) is the most popular stock in this table. On the other hand The Coca-Cola Company (NYSE:KO) is the least popular one with only 62 bullish hedge fund positions. Compared to these stocks Paypal Holdings Inc (NASDAQ:PYPL) is more popular among hedge funds. Our overall hedge fund sentiment score for PYPL is 96. Stocks with higher number of hedge fund positions relative to other stocks as well as relative to their historical range receive a higher sentiment score. Our calculations showed that top 30 most popular stocks among hedge funds returned 81.2% in 2019 and 2020, and outperformed the S&P 500 ETF (SPY) by 26 percentage points. These stocks gained 7% in 2021 through March 12th and still beat the market by 1.6 percentage points. Hedge funds were also right about PYPL as the stock returned 6.9% since the end of the fourth quarter (through 3/12) and outperformed the market. If you are interested in investing in large cap stocks with huge upside potential, you should check out the top 30 most popular stocks among hedge funds as most of these stocks already outperformed the market since 2019.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":43,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":321341087,"gmtCreate":1615397471249,"gmtModify":1704782304477,"author":{"id":"3576336077780129","authorId":"3576336077780129","name":"moJoe","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/51b5f1e98cb521c4bd52447b0ea6e905","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576336077780129","authorIdStr":"3576336077780129"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GME\">$GameStop(GME)$</a>suspended","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GME\">$GameStop(GME)$</a>suspended","text":"$GameStop(GME)$suspended","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/321341087","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":224,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":378521350,"gmtCreate":1619051523670,"gmtModify":1704718803977,"author":{"id":"3576336077780129","authorId":"3576336077780129","name":"moJoe","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/51b5f1e98cb521c4bd52447b0ea6e905","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576336077780129","authorIdStr":"3576336077780129"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"This will be next in line after gamestop ?.&nbsp; This is one of the most heavily shorted stock by hedge fxcks. A lot of volumes gone to this stock but still stuck at below 10. Hedge funds trying to manipulate market. Also try looking @ sundial always no1 on volumes and its on negatives most days. Try figuring that out. Even goods news it stays on red..","listText":"This will be next in line after gamestop ?.&nbsp; This is one of the most heavily shorted stock by hedge fxcks. A lot of volumes gone to this stock but still stuck at below 10. Hedge funds trying to manipulate market. Also try looking @ sundial always no1 on volumes and its on negatives most days. Try figuring that out. Even goods news it stays on red..","text":"This will be next in line after gamestop ?. This is one of the most heavily shorted stock by hedge fxcks. A lot of volumes gone to this stock but still stuck at below 10. Hedge funds trying to manipulate market. Also try looking @ sundial always no1 on volumes and its on negatives most days. Try figuring that out. Even goods news it stays on red..","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/378521350","repostId":"1125387983","repostType":2,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":764,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":345036188,"gmtCreate":1618258403044,"gmtModify":1704708202183,"author":{"id":"3576336077780129","authorId":"3576336077780129","name":"moJoe","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/51b5f1e98cb521c4bd52447b0ea6e905","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576336077780129","authorIdStr":"3576336077780129"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"How will it fade away....hahaha. mevin capital lossing 49% in the quarter says it all. They are getting squeezed out by retailer by holding stocks. Its a matter of time, the other 51% will be gone. Buy the dip. Hold the bananas.","listText":"How will it fade away....hahaha. mevin capital lossing 49% in the quarter says it all. They are getting squeezed out by retailer by holding stocks. Its a matter of time, the other 51% will be gone. Buy the dip. Hold the bananas.","text":"How will it fade away....hahaha. mevin capital lossing 49% in the quarter says it all. They are getting squeezed out by retailer by holding stocks. Its a matter of time, the other 51% will be gone. Buy the dip. Hold the bananas.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/345036188","repostId":"1188840982","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":659,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":351189841,"gmtCreate":1616574933683,"gmtModify":1704795842817,"author":{"id":"3576336077780129","authorId":"3576336077780129","name":"moJoe","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/51b5f1e98cb521c4bd52447b0ea6e905","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576336077780129","authorIdStr":"3576336077780129"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Interesting. Its cathie the gooddess.","listText":"Interesting. Its cathie the gooddess.","text":"Interesting. Its cathie the gooddess.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/351189841","repostId":"1103096316","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":531,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":350922823,"gmtCreate":1616152406162,"gmtModify":1704791588046,"author":{"id":"3576336077780129","authorId":"3576336077780129","name":"moJoe","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/51b5f1e98cb521c4bd52447b0ea6e905","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576336077780129","authorIdStr":"3576336077780129"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Get out now..keep on the look out.","listText":"Get out now..keep on the look out.","text":"Get out now..keep on the look out.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/350922823","repostId":"1137663173","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1137663173","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1616148159,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1137663173?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-03-19 18:02","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Tech Stocks Are Falling Fast, Here Are 4 Cyclical Stocks That Are Still Cheap","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1137663173","media":"marketwatch","summary":"Investors have rushed into so-called cyclical stocks as the economic outlook has gotten a shot in th","content":"<p>Investors have rushed into so-called cyclical stocks as the economic outlook has gotten a shot in the arm and high-flying tech stocks take it on the chin. Even though many of those stocks, which perform better in times of economic expansion, now look a little expensive, a few still stand out as fairly cheap.</p>\n<p>Stocks in economically-sensitive sectors such as banks, oil and industrials have performed more than handsomely this year as states announced reopenings and trillions of dollars of fiscal stimulus more than shored up demand. The SPDR S&amp;P Bank (ticker: KBE), Industrial Select Sector SPDR (XLI) and Energy Select Sector SPDR (XLE) exchange-traded funds are all up double digits year to date, dwarfing the S&amp;P 500’s roughly 6% gain and the Nasdaq Composite’s 3.3% advance.</p>\n<p>Tons of cyclicals now look fairly overextended. Caterpillar (CAT), for example, is up 27% year to date. The average analyst price target is 6% below its current trading price. Fortunately, there are some out there trading at attractive valuations with earnings momentum on their side.</p>\n<p>Strategists at Citigroup compiled a list on Monday of stocks with tolerable valuations, a few of which are cyclical in nature. Citi looked at the PEG ratio, or price/earnings to growth, which divides the forward earnings multiple by the expected earnings growth rate. It tells how justified a stock’s valuation is by showing the gap between the multiple and earnings growth. The slimmer the gap, the cheaper the stock. Citi looked at large capitalization stocks—those with market caps above $10 billion--and looked for those with the 25 lowest PEG ratios.</p>\n<p>When economic demand rises robustly, so do manufacturing projects, increasing demand for industrial metals used to build machinery. That’s propelled shares of Freeport McMoRan (FCX), the $50 billion by market capitalization metal miner. The company is worth a quarter more now than it was at the beginning of 2021. But the stock still trades at a PEG ratio of about 0.3, based on an expected compound annual growth rate of earnings for the next 3 years. By comparison, the average stock on the S&amp;P 500 trades at a PEG ratio of 1.3. Freeport McMoRan shares could have plenty of runway ahead.</p>\n<p>Auto makers and other manufacturers need steel to build more products and machines when demand firms up. That’s good news for steelmaker Nucor (NUE), which has seen its currently $20 billion market cap rise by about a third this year. It trades at a 0.9 PEG ratio.</p>\n<p>Shares of General Motors (GM) are up 45% but still trade at a PEG ratio around 1.3, in line with that of the broader market. The stock looks a little less attractive than the others on the list and earnings are only expected to compound in the high single digits over the next 3 years. Still, earnings in 2022 are expected to grow 19% over 2021, according to analysts polled by FactSet. The stock could therefore enjoy plenty of momentum in the near-term. People purchase more cars when they have more discretionary spending capacity.</p>\n<p>Hotel chain Marriott International (MAR) is up more than 20% this year. It trades at a PEG ratio of 0.4. As the virus risk associated with hotels fades, people may be more comfortable visiting them. Plus, people’s increased discretionary spend is a major tailwind for hotels.</p>\n<p>Stocks are pricey by some measures, but that doesn’t mean there are no bargains to ride the sharp economic rebound.</p>","source":"market_watch","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Tech Stocks Are Falling Fast, Here Are 4 Cyclical Stocks That Are Still Cheap</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTech Stocks Are Falling Fast, Here Are 4 Cyclical Stocks That Are Still Cheap\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-03-19 18:02 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.barrons.com/articles/cyclical-stocks-have-been-on-a-tear-here-are-4-names-that-are-still-cheap-51616059802?mod=hp_DAY_Theme_2_2><strong>marketwatch</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Investors have rushed into so-called cyclical stocks as the economic outlook has gotten a shot in the arm and high-flying tech stocks take it on the chin. Even though many of those stocks, which ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/cyclical-stocks-have-been-on-a-tear-here-are-4-names-that-are-still-cheap-51616059802?mod=hp_DAY_Theme_2_2\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite","SPY":"标普500ETF",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/cyclical-stocks-have-been-on-a-tear-here-are-4-names-that-are-still-cheap-51616059802?mod=hp_DAY_Theme_2_2","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/599a65733b8245fcf7868668ef9ad712","article_id":"1137663173","content_text":"Investors have rushed into so-called cyclical stocks as the economic outlook has gotten a shot in the arm and high-flying tech stocks take it on the chin. Even though many of those stocks, which perform better in times of economic expansion, now look a little expensive, a few still stand out as fairly cheap.\nStocks in economically-sensitive sectors such as banks, oil and industrials have performed more than handsomely this year as states announced reopenings and trillions of dollars of fiscal stimulus more than shored up demand. The SPDR S&P Bank (ticker: KBE), Industrial Select Sector SPDR (XLI) and Energy Select Sector SPDR (XLE) exchange-traded funds are all up double digits year to date, dwarfing the S&P 500’s roughly 6% gain and the Nasdaq Composite’s 3.3% advance.\nTons of cyclicals now look fairly overextended. Caterpillar (CAT), for example, is up 27% year to date. The average analyst price target is 6% below its current trading price. Fortunately, there are some out there trading at attractive valuations with earnings momentum on their side.\nStrategists at Citigroup compiled a list on Monday of stocks with tolerable valuations, a few of which are cyclical in nature. Citi looked at the PEG ratio, or price/earnings to growth, which divides the forward earnings multiple by the expected earnings growth rate. It tells how justified a stock’s valuation is by showing the gap between the multiple and earnings growth. The slimmer the gap, the cheaper the stock. Citi looked at large capitalization stocks—those with market caps above $10 billion--and looked for those with the 25 lowest PEG ratios.\nWhen economic demand rises robustly, so do manufacturing projects, increasing demand for industrial metals used to build machinery. That’s propelled shares of Freeport McMoRan (FCX), the $50 billion by market capitalization metal miner. The company is worth a quarter more now than it was at the beginning of 2021. But the stock still trades at a PEG ratio of about 0.3, based on an expected compound annual growth rate of earnings for the next 3 years. By comparison, the average stock on the S&P 500 trades at a PEG ratio of 1.3. Freeport McMoRan shares could have plenty of runway ahead.\nAuto makers and other manufacturers need steel to build more products and machines when demand firms up. That’s good news for steelmaker Nucor (NUE), which has seen its currently $20 billion market cap rise by about a third this year. It trades at a 0.9 PEG ratio.\nShares of General Motors (GM) are up 45% but still trade at a PEG ratio around 1.3, in line with that of the broader market. The stock looks a little less attractive than the others on the list and earnings are only expected to compound in the high single digits over the next 3 years. Still, earnings in 2022 are expected to grow 19% over 2021, according to analysts polled by FactSet. The stock could therefore enjoy plenty of momentum in the near-term. People purchase more cars when they have more discretionary spending capacity.\nHotel chain Marriott International (MAR) is up more than 20% this year. It trades at a PEG ratio of 0.4. As the virus risk associated with hotels fades, people may be more comfortable visiting them. Plus, people’s increased discretionary spend is a major tailwind for hotels.\nStocks are pricey by some measures, but that doesn’t mean there are no bargains to ride the sharp economic rebound.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":323,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":327922246,"gmtCreate":1616052934185,"gmtModify":1704790246526,"author":{"id":"3576336077780129","authorId":"3576336077780129","name":"moJoe","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/51b5f1e98cb521c4bd52447b0ea6e905","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576336077780129","authorIdStr":"3576336077780129"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Nice gains..","listText":"Nice gains..","text":"Nice gains..","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/327922246","repostId":"1138187457","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":471,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":327967582,"gmtCreate":1616052271646,"gmtModify":1704790237094,"author":{"id":"3576336077780129","authorId":"3576336077780129","name":"moJoe","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/51b5f1e98cb521c4bd52447b0ea6e905","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576336077780129","authorIdStr":"3576336077780129"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Genius.","listText":"Genius.","text":"Genius.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/327967582","repostId":"1144305771","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1144305771","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1616052165,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1144305771?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-03-18 15:22","market":"us","language":"en","title":"9 Times Warren Buffett Predicted the Stock Market Accurately","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1144305771","media":"GoBankingRates","summary":"This is why you should take Warren Buffett's advice.\nWhen Warren Buffett talks, the world listens—an","content":"<p>This is why you should take Warren Buffett's advice.</p>\n<p>When Warren Buffett talks, the world listens—and they should. He is, after all, one of the most successful investors of all time and the No. 4 richest person in the world. After earning more than $1 billion in 10 weeks on a&nbsp;bet on Chevron, Buffett briefly became one of only six people ever to grow their net worths to 12 figures, although he’s currently back down under $100 billion. He’s the CEO of Berkshire Hathaway, a holding company that Buffett runs with his investment partner, Charles Munger.</p>\n<p>His prescient calls about stocks and the market, in general, have earned him the nickname “The Oracle of Omaha,” in honor of the Nebraska city where he resides. Buffett offered one of his most dramatic market predictions in September 2017, when he predicted that by 2117, the Dow Jones industrial average would hit 1,000,000.</p>\n<p>While Buffett won’t be around to see if his prediction will come true, it reflects his lifelong belief in the strength of the American economy and the long-term resilience of the U.S. stock market. Here’s a look at some of his most successful andbiggest investment predictions.</p>\n<p><b>Bank of America Will Rise Again</b></p>\n<p>In 2011, Bank of America was suffering from the aftershocks of the subprime mortgage crisis. With the stock trading below $7 per share compared to $19 the year before, Buffett smelled a bargain and bought $5 billion in preferred shares in Bank of America.</p>\n<p>The preferred shares paid a hefty 6 percent yield, resulting in $336 million in annual dividend payments to the company. Even better, the preferred stock came with warrants that allowed Buffett to buy 700 million shares of Bank of America at $7.14 per share.</p>\n<p>At the time, Buffett made this prediction in his annual investment letter: “Our warrants to buy 700 million Bank of America shares will likely be of great value before they expire.” When Buffett exercised the warrants in 2017, he earned $12 billion.Today, Bank of America is trading at around $37.40 a share, and Buffett purchased Berkshire’s more than 1.03 billion shares—the second-largest holding in his portfolio—at an average price of $24.24 per share.</p>\n<p><b>The Time to Start Investing is Now</b></p>\n<p>Buffett told Forbes magazine in late 1974, when the Dow was below 600, that he viewed the market “…like an oversexed guy in a harem. This is&nbsp;the time to start investing.”</p>\n<p>By the time that interview was published, the Dow had climbed by almost 15 percent to 660. Buffett’s prediction came after a notorious bear market from 1973 to 1974. Perhaps more than any other prediction, this prognostication highlights Buffett’s philosophy to “be fearful when others are greedy and greedy when others are fearful.”</p>\n<p><b>Stock Market Returns Will Be 6 Percent</b></p>\n<p>In 1999, stocks were near the end of an incredible run. The market began a big upswing starting in 1982, and returns for 1995 to 1999 were 37.58 percent, 22.96 percent, 33.36 percent, 28.58 percent, and 21.04 percent, respectively. The Oracle of Omaha made a dramatic, long-term, counter-trend prediction in the midst of all of this ebullience.</p>\n<p>Buffett confidently predicted that stock market returns for the following 17 years would be nothing like the previous 17 years. In fact, he suggested that the “most probable return” for the next 17 years would be 6 percent.</p>\n<p>By 2016, at the end of the 17-year period, stocks had returned 5.9 percent — an amazingly accurate prediction over such a long time period.</p>\n<p><b>Index Funds Will Outperform Hedge Funds</b></p>\n<p>What might have been Buffett’s most dramatic prediction came in 2007, when he offered to bet $500,000 that over the following 10 years, the S&amp;P 500 index would outperform a portfolio of hedge funds when fees were included. Hedge fund manager Ted Seides, of Protege Partners, took the bet.</p>\n<p>When 2017 rolled around, Seides was the one who had to pay up. In fact, the bet was so lopsided that Seides conceded the wager before the entire 10 years had expired. At that point, Seides’ collection of funds had earned just 2.2 percent per year, while the S&amp;P 500 index had earned more than 7 percent per year, thus supporting Buffett’s point that&nbsp;indexing typically can beat actively managed funds.</p>\n<p><b>Goldman Sachs is Down But Not Out</b></p>\n<p>In late September 2008, investment bank Goldman Sachs was a wounded giant caught in the vortex of the financial implosion it helped create. Predicting that Goldman Sachs would not only survive but thrive, Buffett invested $5 billion in the company. In exchange, Goldman Sachs gave Buffett preferred shares that paid an amazing 10 percent per year in income.</p>\n<p>Additionally, Buffett was granted $5 billion in warrants, allowing him to buy the stock at $115 per share. By 2013, Buffett’s prediction had come true with remarkable accuracy — he walked away with a profit of $3.2 billion after investing when the market was low.You and your 401k, of course, will likely not be receiving preferred warrant status like Buffett, but you still would have cashed in big time had you pulled the trigger when Buffett did. Goldman was trading below $80 in November 2008 and is now riding high around $344.</p>\n<p><b>Coca-Cola Is A Long-Term Buy</b></p>\n<p>One of Buffett’s biggest stock market wins can be traced to an investment that started in 1988, the year he first bought into Coca-Cola.Today, Berkshire Hathaway owns 400 million shares, more than 9 percent of the company. On Jan. 1, 1988, Coca-Cola was trading at $2.39. While the stock has seen its ups and downs, it’s trading above $50 per share today.</p>\n<p>In many ways, Coca-Cola epitomizes&nbsp;the entire Warren Buffett investment approach— to take long-term positions in big, established companies that perform well and whose business models you understand.Buffett’s love of Cherry Coke is the stuff of legend—he switched after nearly 50 years of chugging Pepsi. He drinks an average of five cans of the stuff — the nutritional equivalent of junk bonds — every day for a total of 25 percent of his daily caloric intake. He famously told Fortune in 2015, “I’m one-quarter Coca-Cola.”</p>\n<p><b>Stocks Are Cheap</b></p>\n<p>Another one of Buffett’s more famous predictions came to fruition despite the obstacle of a virus</p>\n<p>On Feb. 27, 2017, Buffett told CNBC’s Becky Quick that “…we are not in bubble territory, or anything of the sort,” despite many market observers saying that the current bull run was getting frothy. In fact, Buffett continued, “measured against interest rates, stocks are actually on the cheap side compared to historic valuations.” In other words, Buffett was predicting that stocks were undervalued and that it was time to buy again.</p>\n<p>The Dow Jones industrial average closed at a price of 20,837.44 on the day Buffett made that prediction. Just a little over seven months later, the Dow was at 22,773.67 for a gain of 9.29 percent.Fast-forward to March 10, 2020, and the Dow soared past yet another record close of 32,297.02 in wake of the passage of new COVID relief. That’s a gain of more than 50 percent of the index’s closing price on the day Buffett made his gamble.</p>\n<p><b>Home Capital Group Is Undervalued</b></p>\n<p>In mid-2017, Buffett extended his reach beyond the United States to invest in Canadian lender Home Capital Group. As with many other Buffett transactions, he got a sweet deal in this purchase right from the outset.</p>\n<p>Buffett lent $1.5 billion to the company at interest rates of 9 to 9.5 percent. Buffett also enjoyed the right to buy up to 20 percent of the company’s stock at a 20 percent discount to its market price, predicting that the stock would rise after his purchase.</p>\n<p>The stock deal allowed him to purchase Home Capital at $10 per share.On March 15, 2020, it was trading at $32.50, which means Buffett would have tripled his investment plus change.</p>\n<p><b>Buy and Hold Berkshire Hathaway</b></p>\n<p>One of&nbsp;Buffett’s best investments of all time&nbsp;was in the company that he now runs, Berkshire Hathaway. In 1964, the company offered to buy Buffett’s shares for $11.50 each, to which he agreed. Later, the company reduced the amount of their offer, and this compelled Buffett to not only cancel his sale but to buy enough stock to control the company and fire the manager who lowered his original offer. Buffett had made the prediction again with his wallet that shares in Berkshire Hathaway would rise over time.</p>\n<p>Once again, Buffett’s prediction came true in spades. Now, just one share of Berkshire Hathaway sells for about $281,000. As Buffett’s longest-held investment, Berkshire Hathaway is a reminder to investors that “buy and hold” can indeed result in tremendous gains.</p>","source":"lsy1616052142951","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>9 Times Warren Buffett Predicted the Stock Market Accurately</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n9 Times Warren Buffett Predicted the Stock Market Accurately\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-03-18 15:22 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.gobankingrates.com/investing/stocks/times-warren-buffett-predicted-stock-market-accurately/#10><strong>GoBankingRates</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>This is why you should take Warren Buffett's advice.\nWhen Warren Buffett talks, the world listens—and they should. He is, after all, one of the most successful investors of all time and the No. 4 ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.gobankingrates.com/investing/stocks/times-warren-buffett-predicted-stock-market-accurately/#10\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"GS":"高盛","KO":"可口可乐","HMCBF":"Home Capital Group Inc.","BRK.A":"伯克希尔","BRK.B":"伯克希尔B","BAC":"美国银行"},"source_url":"https://www.gobankingrates.com/investing/stocks/times-warren-buffett-predicted-stock-market-accurately/#10","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1144305771","content_text":"This is why you should take Warren Buffett's advice.\nWhen Warren Buffett talks, the world listens—and they should. He is, after all, one of the most successful investors of all time and the No. 4 richest person in the world. After earning more than $1 billion in 10 weeks on a bet on Chevron, Buffett briefly became one of only six people ever to grow their net worths to 12 figures, although he’s currently back down under $100 billion. He’s the CEO of Berkshire Hathaway, a holding company that Buffett runs with his investment partner, Charles Munger.\nHis prescient calls about stocks and the market, in general, have earned him the nickname “The Oracle of Omaha,” in honor of the Nebraska city where he resides. Buffett offered one of his most dramatic market predictions in September 2017, when he predicted that by 2117, the Dow Jones industrial average would hit 1,000,000.\nWhile Buffett won’t be around to see if his prediction will come true, it reflects his lifelong belief in the strength of the American economy and the long-term resilience of the U.S. stock market. Here’s a look at some of his most successful andbiggest investment predictions.\nBank of America Will Rise Again\nIn 2011, Bank of America was suffering from the aftershocks of the subprime mortgage crisis. With the stock trading below $7 per share compared to $19 the year before, Buffett smelled a bargain and bought $5 billion in preferred shares in Bank of America.\nThe preferred shares paid a hefty 6 percent yield, resulting in $336 million in annual dividend payments to the company. Even better, the preferred stock came with warrants that allowed Buffett to buy 700 million shares of Bank of America at $7.14 per share.\nAt the time, Buffett made this prediction in his annual investment letter: “Our warrants to buy 700 million Bank of America shares will likely be of great value before they expire.” When Buffett exercised the warrants in 2017, he earned $12 billion.Today, Bank of America is trading at around $37.40 a share, and Buffett purchased Berkshire’s more than 1.03 billion shares—the second-largest holding in his portfolio—at an average price of $24.24 per share.\nThe Time to Start Investing is Now\nBuffett told Forbes magazine in late 1974, when the Dow was below 600, that he viewed the market “…like an oversexed guy in a harem. This is the time to start investing.”\nBy the time that interview was published, the Dow had climbed by almost 15 percent to 660. Buffett’s prediction came after a notorious bear market from 1973 to 1974. Perhaps more than any other prediction, this prognostication highlights Buffett’s philosophy to “be fearful when others are greedy and greedy when others are fearful.”\nStock Market Returns Will Be 6 Percent\nIn 1999, stocks were near the end of an incredible run. The market began a big upswing starting in 1982, and returns for 1995 to 1999 were 37.58 percent, 22.96 percent, 33.36 percent, 28.58 percent, and 21.04 percent, respectively. The Oracle of Omaha made a dramatic, long-term, counter-trend prediction in the midst of all of this ebullience.\nBuffett confidently predicted that stock market returns for the following 17 years would be nothing like the previous 17 years. In fact, he suggested that the “most probable return” for the next 17 years would be 6 percent.\nBy 2016, at the end of the 17-year period, stocks had returned 5.9 percent — an amazingly accurate prediction over such a long time period.\nIndex Funds Will Outperform Hedge Funds\nWhat might have been Buffett’s most dramatic prediction came in 2007, when he offered to bet $500,000 that over the following 10 years, the S&P 500 index would outperform a portfolio of hedge funds when fees were included. Hedge fund manager Ted Seides, of Protege Partners, took the bet.\nWhen 2017 rolled around, Seides was the one who had to pay up. In fact, the bet was so lopsided that Seides conceded the wager before the entire 10 years had expired. At that point, Seides’ collection of funds had earned just 2.2 percent per year, while the S&P 500 index had earned more than 7 percent per year, thus supporting Buffett’s point that indexing typically can beat actively managed funds.\nGoldman Sachs is Down But Not Out\nIn late September 2008, investment bank Goldman Sachs was a wounded giant caught in the vortex of the financial implosion it helped create. Predicting that Goldman Sachs would not only survive but thrive, Buffett invested $5 billion in the company. In exchange, Goldman Sachs gave Buffett preferred shares that paid an amazing 10 percent per year in income.\nAdditionally, Buffett was granted $5 billion in warrants, allowing him to buy the stock at $115 per share. By 2013, Buffett’s prediction had come true with remarkable accuracy — he walked away with a profit of $3.2 billion after investing when the market was low.You and your 401k, of course, will likely not be receiving preferred warrant status like Buffett, but you still would have cashed in big time had you pulled the trigger when Buffett did. Goldman was trading below $80 in November 2008 and is now riding high around $344.\nCoca-Cola Is A Long-Term Buy\nOne of Buffett’s biggest stock market wins can be traced to an investment that started in 1988, the year he first bought into Coca-Cola.Today, Berkshire Hathaway owns 400 million shares, more than 9 percent of the company. On Jan. 1, 1988, Coca-Cola was trading at $2.39. While the stock has seen its ups and downs, it’s trading above $50 per share today.\nIn many ways, Coca-Cola epitomizes the entire Warren Buffett investment approach— to take long-term positions in big, established companies that perform well and whose business models you understand.Buffett’s love of Cherry Coke is the stuff of legend—he switched after nearly 50 years of chugging Pepsi. He drinks an average of five cans of the stuff — the nutritional equivalent of junk bonds — every day for a total of 25 percent of his daily caloric intake. He famously told Fortune in 2015, “I’m one-quarter Coca-Cola.”\nStocks Are Cheap\nAnother one of Buffett’s more famous predictions came to fruition despite the obstacle of a virus\nOn Feb. 27, 2017, Buffett told CNBC’s Becky Quick that “…we are not in bubble territory, or anything of the sort,” despite many market observers saying that the current bull run was getting frothy. In fact, Buffett continued, “measured against interest rates, stocks are actually on the cheap side compared to historic valuations.” In other words, Buffett was predicting that stocks were undervalued and that it was time to buy again.\nThe Dow Jones industrial average closed at a price of 20,837.44 on the day Buffett made that prediction. Just a little over seven months later, the Dow was at 22,773.67 for a gain of 9.29 percent.Fast-forward to March 10, 2020, and the Dow soared past yet another record close of 32,297.02 in wake of the passage of new COVID relief. That’s a gain of more than 50 percent of the index’s closing price on the day Buffett made his gamble.\nHome Capital Group Is Undervalued\nIn mid-2017, Buffett extended his reach beyond the United States to invest in Canadian lender Home Capital Group. As with many other Buffett transactions, he got a sweet deal in this purchase right from the outset.\nBuffett lent $1.5 billion to the company at interest rates of 9 to 9.5 percent. Buffett also enjoyed the right to buy up to 20 percent of the company’s stock at a 20 percent discount to its market price, predicting that the stock would rise after his purchase.\nThe stock deal allowed him to purchase Home Capital at $10 per share.On March 15, 2020, it was trading at $32.50, which means Buffett would have tripled his investment plus change.\nBuy and Hold Berkshire Hathaway\nOne of Buffett’s best investments of all time was in the company that he now runs, Berkshire Hathaway. In 1964, the company offered to buy Buffett’s shares for $11.50 each, to which he agreed. Later, the company reduced the amount of their offer, and this compelled Buffett to not only cancel his sale but to buy enough stock to control the company and fire the manager who lowered his original offer. Buffett had made the prediction again with his wallet that shares in Berkshire Hathaway would rise over time.\nOnce again, Buffett’s prediction came true in spades. Now, just one share of Berkshire Hathaway sells for about $281,000. As Buffett’s longest-held investment, Berkshire Hathaway is a reminder to investors that “buy and hold” can indeed result in tremendous gains.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":417,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}