Damien Khoo personal page - To The Moon

Damien Khoo

Damien Khoo

No personal profile

386Follow

41Followers

0Topic

0Badge

2021-08-13

Everyday I’m asking myself, how high can it continue?

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2022-01-22

$Novavax(NVAX)$WT...

2021-08-21

It tells historians that bulls can run very longdistance.

S&P 500 hasn't fallen 5% from a peak in nearly 200 sessions--what that tells market historians

2021-07-29

I am sure the “dip buying army” already see this coming a few months back. Plan the trade and execute as planned.

Small-time traders turn 'dip buyers' in China share selloff

2021-09-11

Beaten down and hopefully can get up soon…

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2021-08-01

How about the Chinese stocks that were already hammered? They were hammered in July. Does this mean they will continue to get hammered more in August?

Investors, Beware! Stocks Are Entering the Most Dangerous Stretch of the Year

2021-07-26

Honestly, I doubt so.

Will Square Be Worth More Than PayPal by 2025?

2022-12-12

Market is getting ready to react to the outcrof FOMC meeting.

The Fed May Hand The Market A Huge Surprise This Week

2022-04-23

I think the market will sideways until there isa catalyst.

Wall St Slumps as Weak Earnings, Rate Hike Clarity Spook Investors

2021-08-20

That’s explain why she continued to buy millions of PLTR shares.

Ark's Cathie Wood says stock market 'couldn't be further away from a bubble.' Here's why.

2021-08-09

BNTX had gone up a lot. I think the earningsare already priced into the share price. Well,let’s see.

Disney, AMC, Coinbase, Airbnb, BioNTech, and Other Stocks for Investors to Watch This Week

2021-07-25

Tesla is definitely the bigger one right now. But NIO in my opinion has more growth potential

Will NIO Stock Follow Tesla's Footsteps? What To Consider Between These Two EV Stocks

2021-07-20

This explains why the vaccine stocks are ???

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2021-07-12

Like

Chase, Delta, Goldman Sachs, PepsiCo, and Other Stocks to Watch This Week

2022-02-24

Buy high sell low

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2021-09-16

Apple. Because Micro…soft

Apple Vs. Microsoft: Who Is Inclined To Fall Harder In Case Of Correction

2021-09-04

Momentum has slowed. It’s timely for a correction or pullback so new buyers can enter.

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2021-08-23

I’m thinking of closing my non performing stocks and adding BABA too

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2021-07-23

I personally think this is short term. If your time horizon is 1 to 2 years. Should buy the dip.

Bilibili fell over 5% in morning trading

Go to Tiger App to see more news

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"userPageInfo":{"id":"3576444918223783","uuid":"3576444918223783","gmtCreate":1613350894495,"gmtModify":1725620376508,"name":"Damien Khoo","pinyin":"damienkhoodamienkhoo","introduction":"","introductionEn":"","signature":"","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/f08d9f6bdc3c0038e9aa81591b4df363","hat":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7b75ce0c34afff716602792a5d0929dd","hatId":"shopping-c3edc01e31206bedfff9b5eecea7bb42","hatName":"2023 New Year ","vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":41,"headSize":386,"tweetSize":114,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":2,"name":"无畏虎","nameTw":"無畏虎","represent":"初生牛犊","factor":"发布3条非转发主帖,1条获得他人回复或点赞","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":"success","userBadges":[{"badgeId":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493-2","templateUuid":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493","name":"Senior Tiger","description":"Join the tiger community for 1000 days","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0063fb68ea29c9ae6858c58630e182d5","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/96c699a93be4214d4b49aea6a5a5d1a4","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/35b0e542a9ff77046ed69ef602bc105d","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.11.12","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"44212b71d0be4ec88898348dbe882e03-3","templateUuid":"44212b71d0be4ec88898348dbe882e03","name":"President Tiger","description":"The transaction amount of the securities account reaches $1,000,000","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fbeac6bb240db7da8b972e5183d050ba","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/436cdf80292b99f0a992e78750ac4e3a","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/506a259a7b456f037592c3b23c779599","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.07.14","exceedPercentage":"93.22%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1101},{"badgeId":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be-2","templateUuid":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be","name":"Master Trader","description":"Total number of securities or futures transactions reached 100","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ad22cfbe2d05aa393b18e9226e4b0307","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/36702e6ff3ffe46acafee66cc85273ca","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d52eb88fa385cf5abe2616ed63781765","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.28","exceedPercentage":"80.69%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100},{"badgeId":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789-1","templateUuid":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789","name":"Knowledgeable Investor","description":"Traded more than 10 stocks","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e74cc24115c4fbae6154ec1b1041bf47","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d48265cbfd97c57f9048db29f22227b0","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76c6d6898b073c77e1c537ebe9ac1c57","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1102},{"badgeId":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84-1","templateUuid":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84","name":"Real Trader","description":"Completed a transaction","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":5,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":null,"starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":12,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"hot","tweets":[{"id":322449754783760,"gmtCreate":1719753443204,"gmtModify":1719753448871,"author":{"id":"3576444918223783","authorId":"3576444918223783","name":"Damien Khoo","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/f08d9f6bdc3c0038e9aa81591b4df363","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576444918223783","authorIdStr":"3576444918223783"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/SQQQ\">$ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ(SQQQ)$&nbsp;</a>&nbsp;","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/SQQQ\">$ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ(SQQQ)$&nbsp;</a>&nbsp;","text":"$ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ(SQQQ)$","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/2cfbe48c9ba4762300ed2fcba60fd40a","width":"927","height":"1599"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/322449754783760","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":194,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":317688246255800,"gmtCreate":1718599773553,"gmtModify":1718599776911,"author":{"id":"3576444918223783","authorId":"3576444918223783","name":"Damien Khoo","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/f08d9f6bdc3c0038e9aa81591b4df363","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576444918223783","authorIdStr":"3576444918223783"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"&nbsp;As. &nbsp; &nbsp;","listText":"&nbsp;As. &nbsp; &nbsp;","text":"As.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/317688246255800","repostId":"2443272529","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2443272529","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1718594757,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2443272529?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2024-06-17 11:25","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Stock Splits Ahead? 3 AI Stocks Poised to Split After Nvidia","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2443272529","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Several companies could look to replicate Nvidia's post-split success.","content":"<html><head></head><body><ul style=\"\"><li><p>Despite its comeback, Microsoft has gone 21 years without a stock split.</p></li><li><p>A recent study by Bank of America revealed that stock-split stocks have outperformed the S&amp;P 500 for decades.</p></li><li><p>Super Micro Computer could split to reignite the stock&#39;s momentum.</p></li></ul><p>Artificial intelligence (AI) superstar stock <strong>Nvidia</strong> (NVDA 1.75%) announced a stock split on May 22 this year. Share prices have climbed 36% since then. The wild success could have some other AI companies on Wall Street contemplating following suit (even if the split isn&#39;t necessarily the sole reason behind the stock&#39;s performance).</p><p>Remember, a stock split doesn&#39;t change anything about the underlying business or the stock&#39;s fundamentals. It just divides the stock into more shares with proportionally lower prices and per-share financials. Companies split their stock for numerous reasons, including making shares easier to buy and sell for employees (who might get them as stock options in lieu of payment) and investors.</p><p>With Nvidia finalizing its stock split on June 10, the question that naturally follows is: Which AI companies might be next for a stock split? Three Fool.com contributors identified <strong>Microsoft</strong> (MSFT 0.22%), <strong><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/META\">Meta Platforms</a></strong> (META 0.11%), and <strong>Super Micro Computer</strong> (SMCI -3.05%) as those most likely AI stocks to split next.</p><p>Here is why.</p><h2 id=\"id_1288277989\">This venerable tech giant looks primed for a split</h2><p><strong>Microsoft: </strong>As the company that until very recently had the world&#39;s most valuable market cap, Microsoft is not a surprising candidate for a stock split. Considering how much stock price appreciation it has seen in the past few years, the surprising thing about Microsoft&#39;s stock is that it has been more than 21 years since Microsoft last split its stock.</p><p>Between the late 1980s and early 2000s, when Microsoft was the dominated PC operating system company, stock splits were much more common. During that period, the stock split nine times.</p><p>However, the Dot-Com market crash and then the rise of <strong>Apple</strong> chipped away at Microsoft&#39;s leadership over time, particularly after it launched the iPhone in 2007. Between 2000 and 2014, when Steve Ballmer was CEO, Microsoft stock lost 37% of its value.</p><p>The state of the company finally improved when Satya Nadella took the CEO position in 2014. He redefined Microsoft as a cloud company and, later, a leader in AI. Over Nadella&#39;s 10-year tenure, Microsoft stock has risen more than 1,110%, taking it to $440 per share as of this writing.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/21b153c532d27825bbaf701a2ce478f1\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"441\"/></p><p>MSFT data by YCharts</p><p>Given that level of stock price growth, the need for a split grew as well. The company&#39;s growth suggests that stock price appreciation is likely to continue. In the first three quarters of fiscal 2024 (ended March 31), net income increased by 26% year over year. The company&#39;s outlook for the rest of the fiscal year points to double-digit percentage revenue growth as well.</p><p>Another factor pointing to a stock split involves Microsoft being a component of the <strong>Dow Jones Industrial Average</strong>. Since the Dow is price-weighted, Microsoft will probably need to split its stock so as not to have an outsized effect on the index&#39;s movement. That should ensure that the 21-year stock split drought finally comes to an end.</p><h2 id=\"id_104300193\">Meta Platforms has never issued a stock split, but the time may finally be here</h2><p><strong>Meta Platforms:</strong> All in all, 2024 has been a great year for the &#34;Magnificent Seven&#34; stocks. Indeed, six of the seven (<strong>Tesla </strong>being the only exception) have recorded double-digit percentage gains year to date. Yet of these stocks, only one has never split its shares: Meta Platforms. The time for that first-ever split has arrived. Here&#39;s why.</p><p>First off, the stock is expensive. A Meta share trades for around $504 -- placing the stock beyond the reach of many retail investors. By implementing a 3-for-1 or even 5-for-1 stock split, Meta could significantly lower its share price and make the stock more accessible to retail investors who might not be able to buy fractional shares, potentially reducing the price to a more reasonable range of $100 to $175.</p><p>A recent study from <strong>Bank of America</strong> revealed another compelling reason for Meta to split its shares: outperformance. The study, which examined stock splits since 1980, found that stocks that were split beat the <strong>S&amp;P 500</strong> during the 12 months that followed the split. This was true in each of the last four decades (see chart below).</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/3309dbd807151809e7ac72367e36eff1\" tg-width=\"1200\" tg-height=\"1200\"/></p><p>Image source: Statista</p><p>While many investors would likely cheer a Meta stock split, it&#39;s far from a given. Meta&#39;s management isn&#39;t a fan of stock splits. In its 12 years as a public company, Meta has never performed a stock split. That&#39;s in stark contrast to other tech megacaps like <strong><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ADBE\">Adobe</a></strong> and Microsoft, who split their shares four and seven times, respectively, in the first 12 years of their existence as public companies.</p><p>At any rate, investors should keep a close eye on Meta Platforms. Stock split or not, the company remains one of the top-performing tech stocks thanks to its lucrative digital advertising business. With its Q1 revenue growing at 27% year over year and earnings soaring 127%, long-term investors would be wise to consider Meta as a buy-and-hold candidate.</p><h2 id=\"id_3737677607\">Super Micro Computer could opt to refuel its rally with a stock split</h2><p><strong>Super Micro Computer:</strong> For a while, Super Micro Computer was seemingly the AI version of Robin to Nvidia&#39;s Batman. But share prices have stalled and declined after topping out at $1,229. Meanwhile, Nvidia keeps climbing to new highs. Here is why Super Micro Computer, or Supermicro as it&#39;s also known, could still get back on track, necessitating a stock split.</p><p>The company sells modular server systems for data centers. This is great for companies that don&#39;t have the expertise or time to custom-build their own and just want to deploy compute as quickly as possible. Like Nvidia, Supermicro has become a &#34;go-to&#34; choice as AI spending surges. You can see below how revenue growth has accelerated to 200% year over year, and management has underlined this by noting that demand for its products is dramatically outpacing the broader industry.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/60894650336f5efdfdfdf4c5721c5ce6\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"456\"/></p><p>SMCI Revenue (Quarterly YoY Growth) data by YCharts</p><p>Evidence suggests that Supermicro could benefit from data center tailwinds for some time. According to Newmark, AI will drive enough data center demand to double its power consumption by 2030 from current levels. Supermicro has done nearly $12 billion in trailing-12-month revenue; analysts believe annual revenue could double to over $23 billion by next June.</p><p>Meanwhile, the company has a healthy outlook for earnings growth. Analysts believe earnings per share will grow by an average of 52% annually for the next three to five years. In other words, AI tailwinds remain intact, and fundamental strength should eventually push shares higher. Today, the stock trades at a forward P/E of 33, making it a bargain if Supermicro realizes such strong earnings growth. These catalysts could drive Super Micro Computer higher, an exciting prospect for investors.</p><p><em>So why split the stock?</em></p><p>The company has never split its stock despite shares appreciating over 9,400% since its IPO. Now, trading at over $800 per share, the stock is harder to buy and sell (less liquid). It&#39;s harder for investors to slowly buy shares over time without having a ton of money. Employees sitting on profitable equity in the company must sell in chunks when shares trade at such a price. Splitting the stock lowers the share price and alleviates these problems. Plus, the positive attention a stock split usually generates could help move the share price again after shares have stalled in recent weeks. It&#39;s a potential win-win for everyone.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Stock Splits Ahead? 3 AI Stocks Poised to Split After Nvidia</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nStock Splits Ahead? 3 AI Stocks Poised to Split After Nvidia\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2024-06-17 11:25 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2024/06/16/stock-splits-ahead-3-ai-stocks-poised-to-split-aft/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Despite its comeback, Microsoft has gone 21 years without a stock split.A recent study by Bank of America revealed that stock-split stocks have outperformed the S&P 500 for decades.Super Micro ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2024/06/16/stock-splits-ahead-3-ai-stocks-poised-to-split-aft/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"IE00BFSS8Q28.SGD":"Janus Henderson Balanced A Inc SGD-H","META":"Meta Platforms, Inc.","IE0034235188.USD":"PINEBRIDGE GLOBAL FOCUS EQUITY \"A\" (USD) ACC","BK4529":"IDC概念","IE0009356076.USD":"JANUS HENDERSON GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION \"A2\" (USD) ACC","IE00BJTD4N35.SGD":"Neuberger Berman US Long Short Equity A1  Acc SGD-H","BK4528":"SaaS概念","IE00B7KXQ091.USD":"Janus Henderson Balanced A Inc USD","BK4516":"特朗普概念","LU0256863811.USD":"ALLIANZ US EQUITY \"A\" INC","IE00B3S45H60.SGD":"Neuberger Berman US Multicap Opportunities A Acc SGD-H","IE00BLSP4239.USD":"Legg Mason ClearBridge - Tactical Dividend Income A Mdis USD Plus","LU0061475181.USD":"THREADNEEDLE (LUX) AMERICAN \"AU\" (USD) ACC","LU0109391861.USD":"富兰克林美国机遇基金A Acc","BK4567":"ESG概念","LU0348723411.USD":"ALLIANZ GLOBAL HI-TECH GROWTH \"A\" (USD) INC","BK4585":"ETF&股票定投概念","IE00B19Z9505.USD":"美盛-美国大盘成长股A Acc","IE0004445239.USD":"JANUS HENDERSON US FORTY \"A2\" (USD) ACC","IE00BJJMRX11.SGD":"Janus Henderson Balanced A Acc SGD","IE00BJTD4V19.USD":"NEUBERGER BERMAN US LONG SHORT EQUITY \"A1\" (USD) ACC","IE0034235295.USD":"PINEBRIDGE GLOBAL DYNAMIC ASSET ALLOCATION \"A\" (USD) ACC","BK4576":"AR","LU0053666078.USD":"摩根大通基金-美国股票A（离岸）美元","LU0079474960.USD":"联博美国增长基金A","GB00BDT5M118.USD":"天利环球扩展Alpha基金A Acc","LU0082616367.USD":"摩根大通美国科技A（dist）","BK4566":"资本集团","BK4587":"ChatGPT概念","GB00B4QBRK32.GBP":"FUNDSMITH EQUITY \"R\" (GBP) INC","IE00B1XK9C88.USD":"PINEBRIDGE US LARGE CAP RESEARCH ENHANCED \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU0353189680.USD":"富国美国全盘成长基金Cl A Acc","LU0061474960.USD":"天利环球焦点基金AU Acc","GB00B4LPDJ14.GBP":"FUNDSMITH EQUITY \"R\" (GBP) ACC","SMCI":"超微电脑","BK4577":"网络游戏","IE00B1BXHZ80.USD":"Legg Mason ClearBridge - US Appreciation A Acc USD","IE00BKDWB100.SGD":"PINEBRIDGE US LARGE CAP RESEARCH ENHANCED \"A5H\" (SGDHDG) ACC","IE00BBT3K403.USD":"LEGG MASON CLEARBRIDGE TACTICAL DIVIDEND INCOME \"A(USD) ACC","BK4588":"碎股","BK4579":"人工智能","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓","BK4141":"半导体产品","MSFT":"微软","IE0004445015.USD":"JANUS HENDERSON BALANCED \"A2\" (USD) ACC","BK4551":"寇图资本持仓","LU0316494557.USD":"FRANKLIN GLOBAL FUNDAMENTAL STRATEGIES \"A\" ACC","IE00B775SV38.USD":"NEUBERGER BERMAN US MULTICAP OPPORTUNITIES \"A\" (USD) ACC","BK4097":"系统软件","LU0061474705.USD":"THREADNEEDLE (LUX) GLOBAL DYNAMIC REAL RETURN \"AU\" (USD) ACC","LU0289960550.SGD":"AB FCP I - GLOBAL EQUITY BLEND PORTFOLIO 'A' (SGD) ACC","NVDA":"英伟达"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2024/06/16/stock-splits-ahead-3-ai-stocks-poised-to-split-aft/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2443272529","content_text":"Despite its comeback, Microsoft has gone 21 years without a stock split.A recent study by Bank of America revealed that stock-split stocks have outperformed the S&P 500 for decades.Super Micro Computer could split to reignite the stock's momentum.Artificial intelligence (AI) superstar stock Nvidia (NVDA 1.75%) announced a stock split on May 22 this year. Share prices have climbed 36% since then. The wild success could have some other AI companies on Wall Street contemplating following suit (even if the split isn't necessarily the sole reason behind the stock's performance).Remember, a stock split doesn't change anything about the underlying business or the stock's fundamentals. It just divides the stock into more shares with proportionally lower prices and per-share financials. Companies split their stock for numerous reasons, including making shares easier to buy and sell for employees (who might get them as stock options in lieu of payment) and investors.With Nvidia finalizing its stock split on June 10, the question that naturally follows is: Which AI companies might be next for a stock split? Three Fool.com contributors identified Microsoft (MSFT 0.22%), Meta Platforms (META 0.11%), and Super Micro Computer (SMCI -3.05%) as those most likely AI stocks to split next.Here is why.This venerable tech giant looks primed for a splitMicrosoft: As the company that until very recently had the world's most valuable market cap, Microsoft is not a surprising candidate for a stock split. Considering how much stock price appreciation it has seen in the past few years, the surprising thing about Microsoft's stock is that it has been more than 21 years since Microsoft last split its stock.Between the late 1980s and early 2000s, when Microsoft was the dominated PC operating system company, stock splits were much more common. During that period, the stock split nine times.However, the Dot-Com market crash and then the rise of Apple chipped away at Microsoft's leadership over time, particularly after it launched the iPhone in 2007. Between 2000 and 2014, when Steve Ballmer was CEO, Microsoft stock lost 37% of its value.The state of the company finally improved when Satya Nadella took the CEO position in 2014. He redefined Microsoft as a cloud company and, later, a leader in AI. Over Nadella's 10-year tenure, Microsoft stock has risen more than 1,110%, taking it to $440 per share as of this writing.MSFT data by YChartsGiven that level of stock price growth, the need for a split grew as well. The company's growth suggests that stock price appreciation is likely to continue. In the first three quarters of fiscal 2024 (ended March 31), net income increased by 26% year over year. The company's outlook for the rest of the fiscal year points to double-digit percentage revenue growth as well.Another factor pointing to a stock split involves Microsoft being a component of the Dow Jones Industrial Average. Since the Dow is price-weighted, Microsoft will probably need to split its stock so as not to have an outsized effect on the index's movement. That should ensure that the 21-year stock split drought finally comes to an end.Meta Platforms has never issued a stock split, but the time may finally be hereMeta Platforms: All in all, 2024 has been a great year for the \"Magnificent Seven\" stocks. Indeed, six of the seven (Tesla being the only exception) have recorded double-digit percentage gains year to date. Yet of these stocks, only one has never split its shares: Meta Platforms. The time for that first-ever split has arrived. Here's why.First off, the stock is expensive. A Meta share trades for around $504 -- placing the stock beyond the reach of many retail investors. By implementing a 3-for-1 or even 5-for-1 stock split, Meta could significantly lower its share price and make the stock more accessible to retail investors who might not be able to buy fractional shares, potentially reducing the price to a more reasonable range of $100 to $175.A recent study from Bank of America revealed another compelling reason for Meta to split its shares: outperformance. The study, which examined stock splits since 1980, found that stocks that were split beat the S&P 500 during the 12 months that followed the split. This was true in each of the last four decades (see chart below).Image source: StatistaWhile many investors would likely cheer a Meta stock split, it's far from a given. Meta's management isn't a fan of stock splits. In its 12 years as a public company, Meta has never performed a stock split. That's in stark contrast to other tech megacaps like Adobe and Microsoft, who split their shares four and seven times, respectively, in the first 12 years of their existence as public companies.At any rate, investors should keep a close eye on Meta Platforms. Stock split or not, the company remains one of the top-performing tech stocks thanks to its lucrative digital advertising business. With its Q1 revenue growing at 27% year over year and earnings soaring 127%, long-term investors would be wise to consider Meta as a buy-and-hold candidate.Super Micro Computer could opt to refuel its rally with a stock splitSuper Micro Computer: For a while, Super Micro Computer was seemingly the AI version of Robin to Nvidia's Batman. But share prices have stalled and declined after topping out at $1,229. Meanwhile, Nvidia keeps climbing to new highs. Here is why Super Micro Computer, or Supermicro as it's also known, could still get back on track, necessitating a stock split.The company sells modular server systems for data centers. This is great for companies that don't have the expertise or time to custom-build their own and just want to deploy compute as quickly as possible. Like Nvidia, Supermicro has become a \"go-to\" choice as AI spending surges. You can see below how revenue growth has accelerated to 200% year over year, and management has underlined this by noting that demand for its products is dramatically outpacing the broader industry.SMCI Revenue (Quarterly YoY Growth) data by YChartsEvidence suggests that Supermicro could benefit from data center tailwinds for some time. According to Newmark, AI will drive enough data center demand to double its power consumption by 2030 from current levels. Supermicro has done nearly $12 billion in trailing-12-month revenue; analysts believe annual revenue could double to over $23 billion by next June.Meanwhile, the company has a healthy outlook for earnings growth. Analysts believe earnings per share will grow by an average of 52% annually for the next three to five years. In other words, AI tailwinds remain intact, and fundamental strength should eventually push shares higher. Today, the stock trades at a forward P/E of 33, making it a bargain if Supermicro realizes such strong earnings growth. These catalysts could drive Super Micro Computer higher, an exciting prospect for investors.So why split the stock?The company has never split its stock despite shares appreciating over 9,400% since its IPO. Now, trading at over $800 per share, the stock is harder to buy and sell (less liquid). It's harder for investors to slowly buy shares over time without having a ton of money. Employees sitting on profitable equity in the company must sell in chunks when shares trade at such a price. Splitting the stock lowers the share price and alleviates these problems. Plus, the positive attention a stock split usually generates could help move the share price again after shares have stalled in recent weeks. It's a potential win-win for everyone.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":171,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":201466920452168,"gmtCreate":1690213879797,"gmtModify":1690214437732,"author":{"id":"3576444918223783","authorId":"3576444918223783","name":"Damien Khoo","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/f08d9f6bdc3c0038e9aa81591b4df363","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576444918223783","authorIdStr":"3576444918223783"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/TCOM\">$Trip.com Group Limited(TCOM)$&nbsp;</a>","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/TCOM\">$Trip.com Group Limited(TCOM)$&nbsp;</a>","text":"$Trip.com Group Limited(TCOM)$","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/201466920452168","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":384,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9951316116,"gmtCreate":1673397148136,"gmtModify":1676538829909,"author":{"id":"3576444918223783","authorId":"3576444918223783","name":"Damien Khoo","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/f08d9f6bdc3c0038e9aa81591b4df363","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576444918223783","authorIdStr":"3576444918223783"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"The next resistance for BABA is the 120 range. In order to go higher, it needs to break the resistance. With China opened&nbsp;up and clarity from Ant Financial, I believe it will reach 200 range soon. But I think the TP in near term&nbsp;should be around $180.&nbsp;","listText":"The next resistance for BABA is the 120 range. In order to go higher, it needs to break the resistance. With China opened&nbsp;up and clarity from Ant Financial, I believe it will reach 200 range soon. But I think the TP in near term&nbsp;should be around $180.&nbsp;","text":"The next resistance for BABA is the 120 range. In order to go higher, it needs to break the resistance. With China opened up and clarity from Ant Financial, I believe it will reach 200 range soon. But I think the TP in near term should be around $180.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9951316116","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":833,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9923889371,"gmtCreate":1670823336793,"gmtModify":1676538441026,"author":{"id":"3576444918223783","authorId":"3576444918223783","name":"Damien Khoo","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/f08d9f6bdc3c0038e9aa81591b4df363","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576444918223783","authorIdStr":"3576444918223783"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Market is getting ready&nbsp;to react to&nbsp;the outcrof&nbsp;FOMC meeting.&nbsp;","listText":"Market is getting ready&nbsp;to react to&nbsp;the outcrof&nbsp;FOMC meeting.&nbsp;","text":"Market is getting ready to react to the outcrof FOMC meeting.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9923889371","repostId":"2290724492","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2290724492","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1670798437,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2290724492?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-12-12 06:40","market":"us","language":"en","title":"The Fed May Hand The Market A Huge Surprise This Week","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2290724492","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"SummaryThe Fed needs to deliver a hawkish message for 2023 at the December FOMC meeting.It seems hig","content":"<html><head></head><body><h2>Summary</h2><ul><li>The Fed needs to deliver a hawkish message for 2023 at the December FOMC meeting.</li><li>It seems highly probable the Fed will signal a 5% or higher terminal rate for 2023.</li><li>If the Fed fails, it risks losing control of the market.</li></ul><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/82d8be80a0077f14b056bfdd4db0eb8a\" tg-width=\"750\" tg-height=\"500\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>Win McNamee</span></p><p>The FOMC meeting on Wednesday, December 14, will be a meaningful event as it will end the expeditious process of raising rates to catch up with inflation and shift to the next phase, focusing on how high and for how long.</p><p>Listening to Fed officials since the November FOMC meeting, it is clear that the Fed&#39;s projected path of rate hikes will be higher than where they stood at the September FOMC meeting. At that point, the Fed saw the peak terminal rate at 4.6%. Rates are likely heading much higher than what the market has priced in for 2023.</p><p>The problem is that the market doesn&#39;t believe the Fed and currently sees rates at just 4.6% by December 2023.</p><h2>Much Higher, For Much Longer</h2><p>A 50 bps rate hike at the December meeting has been well-telegraphed, and Powell confirmed as much at his Q&amp;A session at the Brookings Institutions on November 30. At least 6 Fed governors have openly noted that they see rates peaking above 5%, and while Powell may not have indicated where he sees the terminal rate, he has stated he sees it higher than the September projection. Additionally, Fed board members like Christopher Waller have suggested that rates have a long way to go and is among the Fed&#39;s most hawkish members. Also, Loretta Mester saw the market pricing of a peak rate of around 5% as not being far off.</p><p>Jim Bullard of the St. Louis Fed thinks rates need to rise to between 5 and 7% to be restrictive enough to kill inflation. Meanwhile, Mary Daly of the San Francisco Fed sees rates at 5% as a good starting point. Raphael Bostic of the Atlanta Fed sees rates between 4.75% and 5%. Thomas Barkin of the Richmond Fed notes that rates may need to rise above 5%, while Neel Kashkari sees rates above his 4.9% September projection.</p><p>So if there were only 6 FOMC members who saw rates above 5% at the September FOMC, there are likely to be at least nine now, and probably several more at the December FOMC meeting that will signal that rates need to be in that 5 to 5.25% region for the peak terminal rate.</p><p>If more evidence is needed, this article from the Wall Street Journal followed the jobs report &#34;suggesting&#34; the Fed would raise rates above 5% in 2023. Then another piece came out on December 5, which again &#34;suggested&#34; rates going above 5% in 2023. The WSJ has often telegraphed Fed monetary policy in 2022, such as back in June ahead of the Fed&#39;s first 75 bps rate hike.</p><p>Given the messaging that rates are likely to be at least 5% and probably higher, it is highly probable the Fed will illustrate its projections through the December dot plot noting a terminal rate for 2023 at 5.1% or 50 bps higher rate than the September projection for 2023.</p><h2>The Market Doesn&#39;t Believe The Fed</h2><p>Of course, this would come at odds with the market, which currently sees the peak terminal rate around 4.9%, and then the Fed cutting rates to 4.58% by December 2023, which is <i>lower than</i>the Fed&#39;s September projections of 4.6%. The market does not believe the Fed will hold rates above 5% for all of 2023, despite Fed officials consistently delivering that message for months.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d4a665b5ca0f1dc3cdb171765f8123ac\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"312\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>Mott Capital</span></p><p>It is perhaps the reasoning behind Powell&#39;s apparent change in positioning at the Brookings Institution, where he seemed to give the market a pass regarding the recent easing of financial conditions. Instead, he focused on telegraphing the pace of rate hikes slowing from 75 to 50 bps. He knew he could also push back against the easing of financial conditions two weeks later at the December FOMC through the projections indicating a higher for longer timing, which the market has been unwilling to accept.</p><h2>Financial Conditions Need To Tighten</h2><p>By any measure, financial conditions have eased a lot since mid-October. The easing financial conditions do not help the Fed&#39;s overall cause of keeping policy restrictive enough to bring down inflation.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/47e20e14c2bfd67a0ee98e94ebb5ceec\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"369\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>Bloomberg</span></p><p>If the Fed can deliver this message of a 5% or higher terminal rate through the end of 2023, we will find that the 2-year rate is too low, which will need to rise. Since the summer, the 2-year rate has been trading at a discount to the December Fed Funds Futures by 10 to 25 bps. So if the Fed can convince the market it sees the Fed Funds rate at 5 to 5.25% by the end of 2023, then it seems probable that the 2-year rate can trade to as high as 4.8% to 5%.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ab6bbea9babf2b8cc871b24fb6b423b2\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"370\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>Bloomberg</span></p><p>It would likely result in the yield curve steepening further and the spread between the 2-year and the 10-year becoming more deeply inverted, as the market prices in a higher recession risk, and rates just staying higher for a longer period.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/51598801716677c82df044dc4df5b629\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"274\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>Bloomberg</span></p><p>It would probably help to reverse a lot of the weakening in the dollar index and potentially push the index higher and back towards 110 over time.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3cbb1e7d55a783c8cbbac5deb72b840e\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"274\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>Bloomberg</span></p><p>It should also raise the VIX index as traders look to add protection again due to the increased risk of the Fed over-tightening. The VIX has already started moving higher since the Fed minutes were released just a couple of weeks ago, which also messaged a higher-for-longer approach to monetary policy in 2023.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/937f171fa291fe09bb5af70849139149\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"274\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>Bloomberg</span></p><p>A strong dollar, higher rates, and higher implied volatility should tighten financial conditions. That will be a massive headwind for equity prices, resulting in stocks giving back nearly all of the gains witnessed since the October lows and potentially filling the technical gaps at 3,745 and 3,580.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/49db7e3529087186cb6b9611353a2bf9\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"284\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>Bloomberg</span></p><p>Is it likely to materialize at the time of the release of the FOMC statement or the press conference? That is impossible to say because that will depend on where implied volatility levels are and whether or not implied volatility is high enough to create a short-squeeze once IV comes crashing down following the news. As of December 9, IV was relatively high, at almost 31% for December 14 options expiration, and is only likely to rise further heading to the meeting next week.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/190ead5d4738acc2bc98a96cab961e25\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"368\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>Bloomberg</span></p><h2>Could Lose Control</h2><p>If the Fed fails to gain control of the narrative and prove to the market it plans to get rates to 5% and hold them there in 2023, it risks losing control of the market, resulting in financial conditions easing further as rates drop, the dollar weakens, implied volatility falls, and stocks rip higher.</p><p>Further easing of financial conditions would likely result in mortgage rates falling, lifting the housing market. Meanwhile, a weaker dollar would increase commodity prices and raise import prices, undoing much of the Fed&#39;s accomplishments in 2022.</p><p>That is why the Fed must stand firm through the dot plot and the press conference if it is serious about bringing inflation down and cooling the labor.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>The Fed May Hand The Market A Huge Surprise This Week</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nThe Fed May Hand The Market A Huge Surprise This Week\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-12-12 06:40 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4563729-fed-may-hand-market-huge-surprise-this-week><strong>Seeking Alpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>SummaryThe Fed needs to deliver a hawkish message for 2023 at the December FOMC meeting.It seems highly probable the Fed will signal a 5% or higher terminal rate for 2023.If the Fed fails, it risks ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4563729-fed-may-hand-market-huge-surprise-this-week\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4563729-fed-may-hand-market-huge-surprise-this-week","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2290724492","content_text":"SummaryThe Fed needs to deliver a hawkish message for 2023 at the December FOMC meeting.It seems highly probable the Fed will signal a 5% or higher terminal rate for 2023.If the Fed fails, it risks losing control of the market.Win McNameeThe FOMC meeting on Wednesday, December 14, will be a meaningful event as it will end the expeditious process of raising rates to catch up with inflation and shift to the next phase, focusing on how high and for how long.Listening to Fed officials since the November FOMC meeting, it is clear that the Fed's projected path of rate hikes will be higher than where they stood at the September FOMC meeting. At that point, the Fed saw the peak terminal rate at 4.6%. Rates are likely heading much higher than what the market has priced in for 2023.The problem is that the market doesn't believe the Fed and currently sees rates at just 4.6% by December 2023.Much Higher, For Much LongerA 50 bps rate hike at the December meeting has been well-telegraphed, and Powell confirmed as much at his Q&A session at the Brookings Institutions on November 30. At least 6 Fed governors have openly noted that they see rates peaking above 5%, and while Powell may not have indicated where he sees the terminal rate, he has stated he sees it higher than the September projection. Additionally, Fed board members like Christopher Waller have suggested that rates have a long way to go and is among the Fed's most hawkish members. Also, Loretta Mester saw the market pricing of a peak rate of around 5% as not being far off.Jim Bullard of the St. Louis Fed thinks rates need to rise to between 5 and 7% to be restrictive enough to kill inflation. Meanwhile, Mary Daly of the San Francisco Fed sees rates at 5% as a good starting point. Raphael Bostic of the Atlanta Fed sees rates between 4.75% and 5%. Thomas Barkin of the Richmond Fed notes that rates may need to rise above 5%, while Neel Kashkari sees rates above his 4.9% September projection.So if there were only 6 FOMC members who saw rates above 5% at the September FOMC, there are likely to be at least nine now, and probably several more at the December FOMC meeting that will signal that rates need to be in that 5 to 5.25% region for the peak terminal rate.If more evidence is needed, this article from the Wall Street Journal followed the jobs report \"suggesting\" the Fed would raise rates above 5% in 2023. Then another piece came out on December 5, which again \"suggested\" rates going above 5% in 2023. The WSJ has often telegraphed Fed monetary policy in 2022, such as back in June ahead of the Fed's first 75 bps rate hike.Given the messaging that rates are likely to be at least 5% and probably higher, it is highly probable the Fed will illustrate its projections through the December dot plot noting a terminal rate for 2023 at 5.1% or 50 bps higher rate than the September projection for 2023.The Market Doesn't Believe The FedOf course, this would come at odds with the market, which currently sees the peak terminal rate around 4.9%, and then the Fed cutting rates to 4.58% by December 2023, which is lower thanthe Fed's September projections of 4.6%. The market does not believe the Fed will hold rates above 5% for all of 2023, despite Fed officials consistently delivering that message for months.Mott CapitalIt is perhaps the reasoning behind Powell's apparent change in positioning at the Brookings Institution, where he seemed to give the market a pass regarding the recent easing of financial conditions. Instead, he focused on telegraphing the pace of rate hikes slowing from 75 to 50 bps. He knew he could also push back against the easing of financial conditions two weeks later at the December FOMC through the projections indicating a higher for longer timing, which the market has been unwilling to accept.Financial Conditions Need To TightenBy any measure, financial conditions have eased a lot since mid-October. The easing financial conditions do not help the Fed's overall cause of keeping policy restrictive enough to bring down inflation.BloombergIf the Fed can deliver this message of a 5% or higher terminal rate through the end of 2023, we will find that the 2-year rate is too low, which will need to rise. Since the summer, the 2-year rate has been trading at a discount to the December Fed Funds Futures by 10 to 25 bps. So if the Fed can convince the market it sees the Fed Funds rate at 5 to 5.25% by the end of 2023, then it seems probable that the 2-year rate can trade to as high as 4.8% to 5%.BloombergIt would likely result in the yield curve steepening further and the spread between the 2-year and the 10-year becoming more deeply inverted, as the market prices in a higher recession risk, and rates just staying higher for a longer period.BloombergIt would probably help to reverse a lot of the weakening in the dollar index and potentially push the index higher and back towards 110 over time.BloombergIt should also raise the VIX index as traders look to add protection again due to the increased risk of the Fed over-tightening. The VIX has already started moving higher since the Fed minutes were released just a couple of weeks ago, which also messaged a higher-for-longer approach to monetary policy in 2023.BloombergA strong dollar, higher rates, and higher implied volatility should tighten financial conditions. That will be a massive headwind for equity prices, resulting in stocks giving back nearly all of the gains witnessed since the October lows and potentially filling the technical gaps at 3,745 and 3,580.BloombergIs it likely to materialize at the time of the release of the FOMC statement or the press conference? That is impossible to say because that will depend on where implied volatility levels are and whether or not implied volatility is high enough to create a short-squeeze once IV comes crashing down following the news. As of December 9, IV was relatively high, at almost 31% for December 14 options expiration, and is only likely to rise further heading to the meeting next week.BloombergCould Lose ControlIf the Fed fails to gain control of the narrative and prove to the market it plans to get rates to 5% and hold them there in 2023, it risks losing control of the market, resulting in financial conditions easing further as rates drop, the dollar weakens, implied volatility falls, and stocks rip higher.Further easing of financial conditions would likely result in mortgage rates falling, lifting the housing market. Meanwhile, a weaker dollar would increase commodity prices and raise import prices, undoing much of the Fed's accomplishments in 2022.That is why the Fed must stand firm through the dot plot and the press conference if it is serious about bringing inflation down and cooling the labor.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":694,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9982430751,"gmtCreate":1667226650973,"gmtModify":1676537880915,"author":{"id":"3576444918223783","authorId":"3576444918223783","name":"Damien Khoo","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/f08d9f6bdc3c0038e9aa81591b4df363","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576444918223783","authorIdStr":"3576444918223783"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Yes if Fed announced 50 bps","listText":"Yes if Fed announced 50 bps","text":"Yes if Fed announced 50 bps","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9982430751","repostId":"1169258680","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1169258680","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1667230136,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1169258680?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-10-31 23:28","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Will The Fed Push The S&P 500 Over 4000?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1169258680","media":"Forbes","summary":"In the past three weeks the stock market has rallied from recent lows, in the context of extreme bearish sentiment. Not unlike the rallies we saw at the beginning of the second quarter and during Augu","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>In the past three weeks the stock market has rallied from recent lows, in the context of extreme bearish sentiment. Not unlike the rallies we saw at the beginning of the second quarter and during August the expectation is that we now enjoy a bear market rally into the end of this year.</p><p>There are several factors to support this. First positioning is extremely bearish not just in the stock market where hedge funds are holding record short levels of futures but also in the options market where a great number of put option positions have been accumulated.</p><h2>Risk appetite</h2><p>Behind this a number of risk appetite indicators are still in very risk averse territory suggesting that on balance many investors are positioned for bad news. What is interesting here is that the stock market and the bond market have effectively stopped reacting to bad news.</p><p>The earnings season has been a case in point both <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMZN\">Amazon</a> and Meta or the old Facebook were severely marked down on earnings disappointments as were <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GOOG\">Google</a> and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSFT\">Microsoft</a> during last week&#39;s critical week for tech earnings but the broad market index rallied, in particular the Dow Jones index was very strong.</p><p>This suggests that the stock market is moving on from some of the concerns it had earlier this year, also with inflation still high there are signs that bond yields are coming in from the extreme high levels of the past couple of weeks - the 10 year bond is now close to the 4% level, a level that&#39;s still painful for stocks, but it has arguably hit a recent high.</p><h2>Earnings</h2><p>Importantly the dollar has softened and in many cases this year currency markets have prefigured stress across other asset classes so the case is building for a bear market rally into the end of the year. Seasonally also November December tend to be quite a strong periods for the stock market particularly in the case of bull markets - which however this is not.</p><p>There&#39;s a number of other factors to consider this week we have the Fed meeting there were expectations of a Fed pivot or even a pause that they&#39;ll do a 50 basis point rise in interest rates and then stop and watch as the data comes in and a lot of cyclical data has been softening suggesting that the economy is beginning to slow and the Fed can expect this to have a downward pressure on consumer and service prices.</p><p>In terms of market action the most likely factor is that volatility comes down for the time being and this will hurt a lot of people playing in the options market - a lot of people who&#39;ve hedged and in turn it may have a technical upward pressure on the stock market and it would be no surprise for me to see the S&amp;P index trade up to and maybe a little bit beyond the 4000 level.</p><p>What does worry me looking out over the next six months is that in the context of a lot of geopolitical stress and growing damage to economy - not just in Europe where Germany is suffering but many emerging markets from Turkey to some across Asia Latin America the housing market in the US is that in the beginning of next year we go into a form of a credit crisis where huge levels of accumulated debt on country balance sheets company balance sheets and consumer balance sheets are troubled by the catalyst of high inflation and high interest rates and this in its own way produces a deeper economic and financial crisis and then we get some real volatility.</p></body></html>","source":"fors","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Will The Fed Push The S&P 500 Over 4000?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWill The Fed Push The S&P 500 Over 4000?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-10-31 23:28 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.forbes.com/sites/mikeosullivan/2022/10/30/will-the-fed-push-the-sp-500-over-4000/?sh=3e8a160c1de3><strong>Forbes</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>In the past three weeks the stock market has rallied from recent lows, in the context of extreme bearish sentiment. Not unlike the rallies we saw at the beginning of the second quarter and during ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.forbes.com/sites/mikeosullivan/2022/10/30/will-the-fed-push-the-sp-500-over-4000/?sh=3e8a160c1de3\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SPY":"标普500ETF",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index"},"source_url":"https://www.forbes.com/sites/mikeosullivan/2022/10/30/will-the-fed-push-the-sp-500-over-4000/?sh=3e8a160c1de3","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1169258680","content_text":"In the past three weeks the stock market has rallied from recent lows, in the context of extreme bearish sentiment. Not unlike the rallies we saw at the beginning of the second quarter and during August the expectation is that we now enjoy a bear market rally into the end of this year.There are several factors to support this. First positioning is extremely bearish not just in the stock market where hedge funds are holding record short levels of futures but also in the options market where a great number of put option positions have been accumulated.Risk appetiteBehind this a number of risk appetite indicators are still in very risk averse territory suggesting that on balance many investors are positioned for bad news. What is interesting here is that the stock market and the bond market have effectively stopped reacting to bad news.The earnings season has been a case in point both Amazon and Meta or the old Facebook were severely marked down on earnings disappointments as were Google and Microsoft during last week's critical week for tech earnings but the broad market index rallied, in particular the Dow Jones index was very strong.This suggests that the stock market is moving on from some of the concerns it had earlier this year, also with inflation still high there are signs that bond yields are coming in from the extreme high levels of the past couple of weeks - the 10 year bond is now close to the 4% level, a level that's still painful for stocks, but it has arguably hit a recent high.EarningsImportantly the dollar has softened and in many cases this year currency markets have prefigured stress across other asset classes so the case is building for a bear market rally into the end of the year. Seasonally also November December tend to be quite a strong periods for the stock market particularly in the case of bull markets - which however this is not.There's a number of other factors to consider this week we have the Fed meeting there were expectations of a Fed pivot or even a pause that they'll do a 50 basis point rise in interest rates and then stop and watch as the data comes in and a lot of cyclical data has been softening suggesting that the economy is beginning to slow and the Fed can expect this to have a downward pressure on consumer and service prices.In terms of market action the most likely factor is that volatility comes down for the time being and this will hurt a lot of people playing in the options market - a lot of people who've hedged and in turn it may have a technical upward pressure on the stock market and it would be no surprise for me to see the S&P index trade up to and maybe a little bit beyond the 4000 level.What does worry me looking out over the next six months is that in the context of a lot of geopolitical stress and growing damage to economy - not just in Europe where Germany is suffering but many emerging markets from Turkey to some across Asia Latin America the housing market in the US is that in the beginning of next year we go into a form of a credit crisis where huge levels of accumulated debt on country balance sheets company balance sheets and consumer balance sheets are troubled by the catalyst of high inflation and high interest rates and this in its own way produces a deeper economic and financial crisis and then we get some real volatility.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":313,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9936599705,"gmtCreate":1662778949407,"gmtModify":1676537139598,"author":{"id":"3576444918223783","authorId":"3576444918223783","name":"Damien Khoo","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/f08d9f6bdc3c0038e9aa81591b4df363","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576444918223783","authorIdStr":"3576444918223783"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9936599705","repostId":"9936252656","repostType":1,"repost":{"id":9936252656,"gmtCreate":1662775860275,"gmtModify":1676537138586,"author":{"id":"3479274802455671","authorId":"3479274802455671","name":"frosti","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8d59e7c960eef6f97257cc799768d81e","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3479274802455671","authorIdStr":"3479274802455671"},"themes":[],"title":"Why ChargePoint Stock Is Charging Up This Week","htmlText":"More analysts than ever now see promise in the electric vehicle charging stock.What happenedChargePoint Holdings(CHPT2.49%)stock jumped this week, gaining a solid 21.6% through the week as of 1 p.m. ET Friday, according to data provided byS&amp;P Global Market Intelligence. If ChargePoint impressed investors with its quarterly numbers and outlook last week, an analyst singled out theelectric vehicle (EV) charging stockthis week as a major potential winner from the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA).So whatMaheep Mandloi fromCredit Suisseinitiated coverage on ChargePoint stock midweek with an outperform rating and a price target of $22 per share. For context, even after this week's stunning rally, ChargePoint stock is hovering around $17.55 per share as of this writing.Mandloi is bullish about C","listText":"More analysts than ever now see promise in the electric vehicle charging stock.What happenedChargePoint Holdings(CHPT2.49%)stock jumped this week, gaining a solid 21.6% through the week as of 1 p.m. ET Friday, according to data provided byS&amp;P Global Market Intelligence. If ChargePoint impressed investors with its quarterly numbers and outlook last week, an analyst singled out theelectric vehicle (EV) charging stockthis week as a major potential winner from the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA).So whatMaheep Mandloi fromCredit Suisseinitiated coverage on ChargePoint stock midweek with an outperform rating and a price target of $22 per share. For context, even after this week's stunning rally, ChargePoint stock is hovering around $17.55 per share as of this writing.Mandloi is bullish about C","text":"More analysts than ever now see promise in the electric vehicle charging stock.What happenedChargePoint Holdings(CHPT2.49%)stock jumped this week, gaining a solid 21.6% through the week as of 1 p.m. ET Friday, according to data provided byS&P Global Market Intelligence. If ChargePoint impressed investors with its quarterly numbers and outlook last week, an analyst singled out theelectric vehicle (EV) charging stockthis week as a major potential winner from the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA).So whatMaheep Mandloi fromCredit Suisseinitiated coverage on ChargePoint stock midweek with an outperform rating and a price target of $22 per share. For context, even after this week's stunning rally, ChargePoint stock is hovering around $17.55 per share as of this writing.Mandloi is bullish about C","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":2,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9936252656","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":0,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":708,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9904673606,"gmtCreate":1660045698508,"gmtModify":1703477284475,"author":{"id":"3576444918223783","authorId":"3576444918223783","name":"Damien Khoo","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/f08d9f6bdc3c0038e9aa81591b4df363","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576444918223783","authorIdStr":"3576444918223783"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Anything is possible.&nbsp;","listText":"Anything is possible.&nbsp;","text":"Anything is possible.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9904673606","repostId":"2258443878","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2258443878","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1659983014,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2258443878?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-08-09 02:23","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Will Plug Power report another earnings miss in Q2 amid ongoing margin pressure?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2258443878","media":"seekingalpha","summary":"Aranga87/iStock via Getty Images  Plug Power (NASDAQ:PLUG) is scheduled to announce Q2 earnings on T","content":"<html><body><p><figure> <picture> <img height=\"864px\" sizes=\"(max-width: 768px) calc(100vw - 36px), (max-width: 1024px) calc(100vw - 132px), (max-width: 1200px) calc(66.6vw - 72px), 600px\" src=\"https://static.seekingalpha.com/cdn/s3/uploads/getty_images/1396887651/image_1396887651.jpg?io=getty-c-w750\" srcset=\"https://static.seekingalpha.com/cdn/s3/uploads/getty_images/1396887651/image_1396887651.jpg?io=getty-c-w1536 1536w, https://static.seekingalpha.com/cdn/s3/uploads/getty_images/1396887651/image_1396887651.jpg?io=getty-c-w1280 1280w, https://static.seekingalpha.com/cdn/s3/uploads/getty_images/1396887651/image_1396887651.jpg?io=getty-c-w1080 1080w, https://static.seekingalpha.com/cdn/s3/uploads/getty_images/1396887651/image_1396887651.jpg?io=getty-c-w750 750w, https://static.seekingalpha.com/cdn/s3/uploads/getty_images/1396887651/image_1396887651.jpg?io=getty-c-w640 640w, https://static.seekingalpha.com/cdn/s3/uploads/getty_images/1396887651/image_1396887651.jpg?io=getty-c-w480 480w, https://static.seekingalpha.com/cdn/s3/uploads/getty_images/1396887651/image_1396887651.jpg?io=getty-c-w320 320w, https://static.seekingalpha.com/cdn/s3/uploads/getty_images/1396887651/image_1396887651.jpg?io=getty-c-w240 240w\" width=\"1536px\"/> </picture> <figcaption><p>Aranga87/iStock via Getty Images</p></figcaption> </figure></p> <p>Plug Power (<span>NASDAQ:PLUG</span>) is scheduled to announce Q2 earnings on Tuesday, Aug. 9, after market close.</p> <p>Consensus EPS estimate is -$0.20 and consensus revenue estimate is $163.97M (+31.6% Y/Y).</p> <p>Over the last 1 year, PLUG has beaten EPS estimates<span> 25% of the time and revenue estimates 75% of the time.</span></p> <p>Over the last 3 months, EPS estimates have seen 10 downward revisions and revenue estimates have seen 14 downward revisions.</p> <p><strong>Q1 recap:</strong></p> <ul> <li>PLUG stock fell after the firm posted wider-than-expected Q1 loss. Margins in its fuel business remained under pressure due to higher natural gas prices.</li> <li>KeyBanc said gross margin pressures persist but are transitory. Evercore ISI said gross margins will get better \"due to steady learning curves and scale\".</li> </ul> <p><strong>Recent news:</strong></p> <ul> <li>The U.S. Senate passed the Inflation Reduction Act a day earlier, which includes a record $369B investment in fighting climate change. Piper Sandler said it expects upward momentum across clean energy firms, saying names like PLUG should \"disproportionately benefit\".</li> <li>Alternative energy stocks, including PLUG, rose after the U.S. Energy Dept. said fuel cells will be among the clean energy technologies included in the Defense Production Act.</li> <li>Shares of PLUG surged after the firm was awarded a 1 GW electrolyzer contract for a hydrogen production complex in Denmark, which would be the world's largest capacity electrolyzer installation. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSSXL\">Morgan Stanley</a> said the order could generate $500M in revenues when it is delivered in 2024, TheFly.com reported.</li> <li>PLUG and New Fortress Energy (NFE) will build a 120 MW industrial-scale green hydrogen plant in Texas, expected to be one of the largest of its kind in North America.</li> <li>PLUG secured a contract to deliver a 5 MW containerized proton exchange membrane electrolyzer system to Irving Oil.</li> <li>PLUG will build a green hydrogen generation plant at the Port of Antwerp-Bruges in Belgium.</li> </ul> <p>SA contributor JR Research said PLUG's recent rally is unsustainable, rating it Hold as it believes investors should wait for a meaningful pullback. </p> <p>PLUG fell 10.1% YTD, but gained 17.8% in the last 6 months and ~38% in the last 1 month.</p> <p>Take a look at PLUG's key stats vs. peers.</p></body></html>","source":"seekingalpha","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Will Plug Power report another earnings miss in Q2 amid ongoing margin pressure?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWill Plug Power report another earnings miss in Q2 amid ongoing margin pressure?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-08-09 02:23 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/news/3869033-will-plug-power-report-another-earnings-miss-in-q2-amid-ongoing-margin-pressure><strong>seekingalpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Aranga87/iStock via Getty Images  Plug Power (NASDAQ:PLUG) is scheduled to announce Q2 earnings on Tuesday, Aug. 9, after market close. Consensus EPS estimate is -$0.20 and consensus revenue estimate ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/news/3869033-will-plug-power-report-another-earnings-miss-in-q2-amid-ongoing-margin-pressure\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"PLUG":"普拉格能源","QTWO":"Q2 Holdings Inc"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/news/3869033-will-plug-power-report-another-earnings-miss-in-q2-amid-ongoing-margin-pressure","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5a36db9d73b4222bc376d24ccc48c8a4","article_id":"2258443878","content_text":"Aranga87/iStock via Getty Images  Plug Power (NASDAQ:PLUG) is scheduled to announce Q2 earnings on Tuesday, Aug. 9, after market close. Consensus EPS estimate is -$0.20 and consensus revenue estimate is $163.97M (+31.6% Y/Y). Over the last 1 year, PLUG has beaten EPS estimates 25% of the time and revenue estimates 75% of the time. Over the last 3 months, EPS estimates have seen 10 downward revisions and revenue estimates have seen 14 downward revisions. Q1 recap:  PLUG stock fell after the firm posted wider-than-expected Q1 loss. Margins in its fuel business remained under pressure due to higher natural gas prices. KeyBanc said gross margin pressures persist but are transitory. Evercore ISI said gross margins will get better \"due to steady learning curves and scale\".  Recent news:  The U.S. Senate passed the Inflation Reduction Act a day earlier, which includes a record $369B investment in fighting climate change. Piper Sandler said it expects upward momentum across clean energy firms, saying names like PLUG should \"disproportionately benefit\". Alternative energy stocks, including PLUG, rose after the U.S. Energy Dept. said fuel cells will be among the clean energy technologies included in the Defense Production Act. Shares of PLUG surged after the firm was awarded a 1 GW electrolyzer contract for a hydrogen production complex in Denmark, which would be the world's largest capacity electrolyzer installation. Morgan Stanley said the order could generate $500M in revenues when it is delivered in 2024, TheFly.com reported. PLUG and New Fortress Energy (NFE) will build a 120 MW industrial-scale green hydrogen plant in Texas, expected to be one of the largest of its kind in North America. PLUG secured a contract to deliver a 5 MW containerized proton exchange membrane electrolyzer system to Irving Oil. PLUG will build a green hydrogen generation plant at the Port of Antwerp-Bruges in Belgium.  SA contributor JR Research said PLUG's recent rally is unsustainable, rating it Hold as it believes investors should wait for a meaningful pullback.  PLUG fell 10.1% YTD, but gained 17.8% in the last 6 months and ~38% in the last 1 month. Take a look at PLUG's key stats vs. peers.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":557,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9065659543,"gmtCreate":1652190597882,"gmtModify":1676535048653,"author":{"id":"3576444918223783","authorId":"3576444918223783","name":"Damien Khoo","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/f08d9f6bdc3c0038e9aa81591b4df363","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576444918223783","authorIdStr":"3576444918223783"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Huge paper loss","listText":"Huge paper loss","text":"Huge paper loss","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9065659543","repostId":"1194024573","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1194024573","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1652190050,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1194024573?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-05-10 21:40","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Novavax Stock Tumbled 19% in Morning Trading","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1194024573","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"The biotech company reported its first profitable quarter, but not by as much as Wall Street expected.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Novavax Stock Tumbled 19% in Morning Trading. The biotech company reported its first profitable quarter, but not by as much as Wall Street expected.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/84d28a2a5dda303c3294b22e4133488f\" tg-width=\"878\" tg-height=\"665\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NVAX\">Novavax</a> said it earned $203 million, or $2.56 a share, in the quarter, swinging from a net loss of $223 million, or $3.05 a share, in the year-ago period.</p><p>Revenue rose to $704 million, from $447 million a year ago.</p><p>Analysts polled by FactSet expected Novavax to report earnings of $2.69 a share on sales of $845 million.</p><p>Novavax said it has been &#34;successful&#34; in launching its COVID-19 vaccine worldwide and it is on track to expand its label use.</p><p>&#34;Importantly, as new variants have emerged, we have progressed our strategy to be ready to address the dynamic environment and continue development beyond COVID-19 with our COVID-19-influenza combination vaccine candidate,&#34; Chief Executive Stanley C. Erck said in a statement.</p><p>Novavax also reiterated its 2022 revenue guidance of between $4 billion and $5 billion.</p><p>The company has submitted an emergency-use authorization request for its COVID-19 vaccine, with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration&#39;s advisory committee scheduled to meet June 7. The vaccine is authorized in a few other countries.</p><p></p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Novavax Stock Tumbled 19% in Morning Trading</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nNovavax Stock Tumbled 19% in Morning Trading\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-05-10 21:40</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>Novavax Stock Tumbled 19% in Morning Trading. The biotech company reported its first profitable quarter, but not by as much as Wall Street expected.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/84d28a2a5dda303c3294b22e4133488f\" tg-width=\"878\" tg-height=\"665\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NVAX\">Novavax</a> said it earned $203 million, or $2.56 a share, in the quarter, swinging from a net loss of $223 million, or $3.05 a share, in the year-ago period.</p><p>Revenue rose to $704 million, from $447 million a year ago.</p><p>Analysts polled by FactSet expected Novavax to report earnings of $2.69 a share on sales of $845 million.</p><p>Novavax said it has been &#34;successful&#34; in launching its COVID-19 vaccine worldwide and it is on track to expand its label use.</p><p>&#34;Importantly, as new variants have emerged, we have progressed our strategy to be ready to address the dynamic environment and continue development beyond COVID-19 with our COVID-19-influenza combination vaccine candidate,&#34; Chief Executive Stanley C. Erck said in a statement.</p><p>Novavax also reiterated its 2022 revenue guidance of between $4 billion and $5 billion.</p><p>The company has submitted an emergency-use authorization request for its COVID-19 vaccine, with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration&#39;s advisory committee scheduled to meet June 7. The vaccine is authorized in a few other countries.</p><p></p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NVAX":"诺瓦瓦克斯医药"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1194024573","content_text":"Novavax Stock Tumbled 19% in Morning Trading. The biotech company reported its first profitable quarter, but not by as much as Wall Street expected.Novavax said it earned $203 million, or $2.56 a share, in the quarter, swinging from a net loss of $223 million, or $3.05 a share, in the year-ago period.Revenue rose to $704 million, from $447 million a year ago.Analysts polled by FactSet expected Novavax to report earnings of $2.69 a share on sales of $845 million.Novavax said it has been \"successful\" in launching its COVID-19 vaccine worldwide and it is on track to expand its label use.\"Importantly, as new variants have emerged, we have progressed our strategy to be ready to address the dynamic environment and continue development beyond COVID-19 with our COVID-19-influenza combination vaccine candidate,\" Chief Executive Stanley C. Erck said in a statement.Novavax also reiterated its 2022 revenue guidance of between $4 billion and $5 billion.The company has submitted an emergency-use authorization request for its COVID-19 vaccine, with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's advisory committee scheduled to meet June 7. The vaccine is authorized in a few other countries.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":964,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9065881392,"gmtCreate":1652170415816,"gmtModify":1676535044966,"author":{"id":"3576444918223783","authorId":"3576444918223783","name":"Damien Khoo","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/f08d9f6bdc3c0038e9aa81591b4df363","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576444918223783","authorIdStr":"3576444918223783"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Wonderful.&nbsp;","listText":"Wonderful.&nbsp;","text":"Wonderful.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9065881392","repostId":"1191853917","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1191853917","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1652169738,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1191853917?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-05-10 16:02","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Novavax Stock Tumbled over 20% in Premarket Trading","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1191853917","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"The biotech company reported its first profitable quarter, but not by as much as Wall Street expected.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Novavax Stock Fell 20% in Premarket Trading. The biotech company reported its first profitable quarter, but not by as much as Wall Street expected.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d12d43ef905d52e8e7063794dfede33f\" tg-width=\"890\" tg-height=\"670\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NVAX\">Novavax</a> said it earned $203 million, or $2.56 a share, in the quarter, swinging from a net loss of $223 million, or $3.05 a share, in the year-ago period.</p><p>Revenue rose to $704 million, from $447 million a year ago.</p><p>Analysts polled by FactSet expected Novavax to report earnings of $2.69 a share on sales of $845 million.</p><p>Novavax said it has been &#34;successful&#34; in launching its COVID-19 vaccine worldwide and it is on track to expand its label use.</p><p>&#34;Importantly, as new variants have emerged, we have progressed our strategy to be ready to address the dynamic environment and continue development beyond COVID-19 with our COVID-19-influenza combination vaccine candidate,&#34; Chief Executive Stanley C. Erck said in a statement.</p><p>Novavax also reiterated its 2022 revenue guidance of between $4 billion and $5 billion.</p><p>The company has submitted an emergency-use authorization request for its COVID-19 vaccine, with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration&#39;s advisory committee scheduled to meet June 7. The vaccine is authorized in a few other countries.</p><p></p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Novavax Stock Tumbled over 20% in Premarket Trading</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nNovavax Stock Tumbled over 20% in Premarket Trading\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-05-10 16:02</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>Novavax Stock Fell 20% in Premarket Trading. The biotech company reported its first profitable quarter, but not by as much as Wall Street expected.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d12d43ef905d52e8e7063794dfede33f\" tg-width=\"890\" tg-height=\"670\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NVAX\">Novavax</a> said it earned $203 million, or $2.56 a share, in the quarter, swinging from a net loss of $223 million, or $3.05 a share, in the year-ago period.</p><p>Revenue rose to $704 million, from $447 million a year ago.</p><p>Analysts polled by FactSet expected Novavax to report earnings of $2.69 a share on sales of $845 million.</p><p>Novavax said it has been &#34;successful&#34; in launching its COVID-19 vaccine worldwide and it is on track to expand its label use.</p><p>&#34;Importantly, as new variants have emerged, we have progressed our strategy to be ready to address the dynamic environment and continue development beyond COVID-19 with our COVID-19-influenza combination vaccine candidate,&#34; Chief Executive Stanley C. Erck said in a statement.</p><p>Novavax also reiterated its 2022 revenue guidance of between $4 billion and $5 billion.</p><p>The company has submitted an emergency-use authorization request for its COVID-19 vaccine, with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration&#39;s advisory committee scheduled to meet June 7. The vaccine is authorized in a few other countries.</p><p></p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NVAX":"诺瓦瓦克斯医药"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1191853917","content_text":"Novavax Stock Fell 20% in Premarket Trading. The biotech company reported its first profitable quarter, but not by as much as Wall Street expected.Novavax said it earned $203 million, or $2.56 a share, in the quarter, swinging from a net loss of $223 million, or $3.05 a share, in the year-ago period.Revenue rose to $704 million, from $447 million a year ago.Analysts polled by FactSet expected Novavax to report earnings of $2.69 a share on sales of $845 million.Novavax said it has been \"successful\" in launching its COVID-19 vaccine worldwide and it is on track to expand its label use.\"Importantly, as new variants have emerged, we have progressed our strategy to be ready to address the dynamic environment and continue development beyond COVID-19 with our COVID-19-influenza combination vaccine candidate,\" Chief Executive Stanley C. Erck said in a statement.Novavax also reiterated its 2022 revenue guidance of between $4 billion and $5 billion.The company has submitted an emergency-use authorization request for its COVID-19 vaccine, with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's advisory committee scheduled to meet June 7. The vaccine is authorized in a few other countries.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":597,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9085164634,"gmtCreate":1650672200701,"gmtModify":1676534773264,"author":{"id":"3576444918223783","authorId":"3576444918223783","name":"Damien Khoo","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/f08d9f6bdc3c0038e9aa81591b4df363","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576444918223783","authorIdStr":"3576444918223783"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"I think the market will sideways until there isa catalyst.&nbsp;","listText":"I think the market will sideways until there isa catalyst.&nbsp;","text":"I think the market will sideways until there isa catalyst.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9085164634","repostId":"2229641491","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2229641491","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1650668840,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2229641491?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-04-23 07:07","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Wall St Slumps as Weak Earnings, Rate Hike Clarity Spook Investors","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2229641491","media":"Reuters","summary":"* Healthcare stocks slump on HCA, Intuitive Surgical numbers* Big tech down ahead of earnings next w","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>* Healthcare stocks slump on HCA, Intuitive Surgical numbers</p><p>* Big tech down ahead of earnings next week</p><p>* Dow posts biggest one-day fall since Oct. 2020</p><p>* Weekly falls: Dow 1.9%, S&amp;P 2.8%, Nasdaq 3.8%</p><p>* Indexes down on Friday: Dow 2.82%, S&amp;P 2.77%, Nasdaq 2.55% </p><p>April 22 (Reuters) - Wall Street tumbled more than 2.5% on Friday, ensuring the three main benchmarks ended in negative territory for the week, as surprise earnings news and increased certainty around aggressive near-term interest rate rises took its toll on investors.</p><p>It was the third straight week of losses for both the S&amp;P 500 and the Nasdaq, while the Dow Jones posted its fourth weekly decline in a row.</p><p>For the Dow, its 2.82% drop on Friday was its biggest one-day fall since October 2020.</p><p>Exaggerated trading swings have become more common recently, as traders adjust to new data points from earnings, as well as when rates will rise again. For the Nasdaq, Friday was the eighth session in April, out of 15 trading days this month, where the index either rose or fell by more than 2%.</p><p>&#34;It&#39;s not very common, over the course of my time doing this job, for the market to move 2% in either direction and to think &#39;there&#39;s not too much to read into that&#39;,&#34; said Craig Erlam, senior market analyst at OANDA.</p><p>&#34;That&#39;s not normal, but that&#39;s just how things have been for such a long time now.&#34;</p><p>Concerns about risks from interest rate hikes continued to reverberate after Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell&#39;s hawkish pivot on Thursday, where he backed moving more quickly to combat inflation and said a 50-basis-point increase would be &#34;on the table&#34; when the Fed meets in May.</p><p>The idea of &#34;front-end loading&#34; the U.S. central bank&#39;s retreat from super-easy monetary policy, which Powell articulated support for on Thursday, has also forced traders to re-evaluate how aggressive subsequent rate rises would be.</p><p>The CBOE Volatility index, also known as Wall Street&#39;s fear gauge, jumped on Friday, ending at its highest level since mid-March.</p><p>Meanwhile, the latest earnings forecasts to jolt investors came from healthcare, with HCA Healthcare and Intuitive Surgical Inc the worst performers on the S&amp;P 500.</p><p>HCA slumped 21.8% after reporting a downbeat profit view, while other hospital operators felt the contagion: Tenet Healthcare, Community Health Systems and Universal Health Services all tumbled between 14% and 17.9%.</p><p>Surgical robot maker Intuitive Surgical dropped 14.3% after warning of weaker demand from hospitals due to tighter finances.</p><p>All 11 major S&amp;P 500 sectors were down, although the 3.6% slip by healthcare was outdone by materials, which was off 3.7%.</p><p>Materials was weighed down by Nucor Corp - down 8.3% after hitting a record high after posting earnings on Thursday - and Freeport-McMoRan Inc, which slipped 6.8% as investors fretted over how interest rate hikes would impact copper miners.</p><p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 981.36 points, or 2.82%, to 33,811.4, the S&amp;P 500 lost 121.88 points, or 2.77%, to 4,271.78 and the Nasdaq Composite dropped 335.36 points, or 2.55%, to 12,839.29.</p><p>For the week, the Dow dipped 1.9%, the S&amp;P dropped 2.8%, and the Nasdaq declined 3.8%.</p><p>The prospect of a more hawkish Fed has led to a rocky start to the year for equities, with Friday&#39;s sell-off taking declines on both the S&amp;P and Dow since the start of the year beyond 10%.</p><p>The trend is more pronounced in tech and growth shares whose valuations are more vulnerable to rising bond yields. The Nasdaq is down 17.9% in 2022.</p><p>Earnings are due next week for the four biggest U.S. companies by market capitalization: Apple, Microsoft , Amazon and Google parent Alphabet.</p><p>The quartet declined between 2.4% and 4.1% on Friday. Meta Platforms Inc, which also has results on deck for next week, dropped 2.1%, taking its losses in the last three days to 15.3%.</p><p>Investors are worried after streaming giant Netflix Inc&#39;s dismal earnings earlier this week sent shockwaves through big tech and stay-at-home darlings which benefited from pandemic factors such as lockdown measures.</p><p>The volume on U.S. exchanges was 11.66 billion shares, compared with the 11.67 billion average for the full session over the last 20 trading days.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Wall St Slumps as Weak Earnings, Rate Hike Clarity Spook Investors</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWall St Slumps as Weak Earnings, Rate Hike Clarity Spook Investors\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-04-23 07:07</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>* Healthcare stocks slump on HCA, Intuitive Surgical numbers</p><p>* Big tech down ahead of earnings next week</p><p>* Dow posts biggest one-day fall since Oct. 2020</p><p>* Weekly falls: Dow 1.9%, S&amp;P 2.8%, Nasdaq 3.8%</p><p>* Indexes down on Friday: Dow 2.82%, S&amp;P 2.77%, Nasdaq 2.55% </p><p>April 22 (Reuters) - Wall Street tumbled more than 2.5% on Friday, ensuring the three main benchmarks ended in negative territory for the week, as surprise earnings news and increased certainty around aggressive near-term interest rate rises took its toll on investors.</p><p>It was the third straight week of losses for both the S&amp;P 500 and the Nasdaq, while the Dow Jones posted its fourth weekly decline in a row.</p><p>For the Dow, its 2.82% drop on Friday was its biggest one-day fall since October 2020.</p><p>Exaggerated trading swings have become more common recently, as traders adjust to new data points from earnings, as well as when rates will rise again. For the Nasdaq, Friday was the eighth session in April, out of 15 trading days this month, where the index either rose or fell by more than 2%.</p><p>&#34;It&#39;s not very common, over the course of my time doing this job, for the market to move 2% in either direction and to think &#39;there&#39;s not too much to read into that&#39;,&#34; said Craig Erlam, senior market analyst at OANDA.</p><p>&#34;That&#39;s not normal, but that&#39;s just how things have been for such a long time now.&#34;</p><p>Concerns about risks from interest rate hikes continued to reverberate after Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell&#39;s hawkish pivot on Thursday, where he backed moving more quickly to combat inflation and said a 50-basis-point increase would be &#34;on the table&#34; when the Fed meets in May.</p><p>The idea of &#34;front-end loading&#34; the U.S. central bank&#39;s retreat from super-easy monetary policy, which Powell articulated support for on Thursday, has also forced traders to re-evaluate how aggressive subsequent rate rises would be.</p><p>The CBOE Volatility index, also known as Wall Street&#39;s fear gauge, jumped on Friday, ending at its highest level since mid-March.</p><p>Meanwhile, the latest earnings forecasts to jolt investors came from healthcare, with HCA Healthcare and Intuitive Surgical Inc the worst performers on the S&amp;P 500.</p><p>HCA slumped 21.8% after reporting a downbeat profit view, while other hospital operators felt the contagion: Tenet Healthcare, Community Health Systems and Universal Health Services all tumbled between 14% and 17.9%.</p><p>Surgical robot maker Intuitive Surgical dropped 14.3% after warning of weaker demand from hospitals due to tighter finances.</p><p>All 11 major S&amp;P 500 sectors were down, although the 3.6% slip by healthcare was outdone by materials, which was off 3.7%.</p><p>Materials was weighed down by Nucor Corp - down 8.3% after hitting a record high after posting earnings on Thursday - and Freeport-McMoRan Inc, which slipped 6.8% as investors fretted over how interest rate hikes would impact copper miners.</p><p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 981.36 points, or 2.82%, to 33,811.4, the S&amp;P 500 lost 121.88 points, or 2.77%, to 4,271.78 and the Nasdaq Composite dropped 335.36 points, or 2.55%, to 12,839.29.</p><p>For the week, the Dow dipped 1.9%, the S&amp;P dropped 2.8%, and the Nasdaq declined 3.8%.</p><p>The prospect of a more hawkish Fed has led to a rocky start to the year for equities, with Friday&#39;s sell-off taking declines on both the S&amp;P and Dow since the start of the year beyond 10%.</p><p>The trend is more pronounced in tech and growth shares whose valuations are more vulnerable to rising bond yields. The Nasdaq is down 17.9% in 2022.</p><p>Earnings are due next week for the four biggest U.S. companies by market capitalization: Apple, Microsoft , Amazon and Google parent Alphabet.</p><p>The quartet declined between 2.4% and 4.1% on Friday. Meta Platforms Inc, which also has results on deck for next week, dropped 2.1%, taking its losses in the last three days to 15.3%.</p><p>Investors are worried after streaming giant Netflix Inc&#39;s dismal earnings earlier this week sent shockwaves through big tech and stay-at-home darlings which benefited from pandemic factors such as lockdown measures.</p><p>The volume on U.S. exchanges was 11.66 billion shares, compared with the 11.67 billion average for the full session over the last 20 trading days.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"HCA":"HCA控股",".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite","ISRG":"直觉外科公司",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2229641491","content_text":"* Healthcare stocks slump on HCA, Intuitive Surgical numbers* Big tech down ahead of earnings next week* Dow posts biggest one-day fall since Oct. 2020* Weekly falls: Dow 1.9%, S&P 2.8%, Nasdaq 3.8%* Indexes down on Friday: Dow 2.82%, S&P 2.77%, Nasdaq 2.55% April 22 (Reuters) - Wall Street tumbled more than 2.5% on Friday, ensuring the three main benchmarks ended in negative territory for the week, as surprise earnings news and increased certainty around aggressive near-term interest rate rises took its toll on investors.It was the third straight week of losses for both the S&P 500 and the Nasdaq, while the Dow Jones posted its fourth weekly decline in a row.For the Dow, its 2.82% drop on Friday was its biggest one-day fall since October 2020.Exaggerated trading swings have become more common recently, as traders adjust to new data points from earnings, as well as when rates will rise again. For the Nasdaq, Friday was the eighth session in April, out of 15 trading days this month, where the index either rose or fell by more than 2%.\"It's not very common, over the course of my time doing this job, for the market to move 2% in either direction and to think 'there's not too much to read into that',\" said Craig Erlam, senior market analyst at OANDA.\"That's not normal, but that's just how things have been for such a long time now.\"Concerns about risks from interest rate hikes continued to reverberate after Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell's hawkish pivot on Thursday, where he backed moving more quickly to combat inflation and said a 50-basis-point increase would be \"on the table\" when the Fed meets in May.The idea of \"front-end loading\" the U.S. central bank's retreat from super-easy monetary policy, which Powell articulated support for on Thursday, has also forced traders to re-evaluate how aggressive subsequent rate rises would be.The CBOE Volatility index, also known as Wall Street's fear gauge, jumped on Friday, ending at its highest level since mid-March.Meanwhile, the latest earnings forecasts to jolt investors came from healthcare, with HCA Healthcare and Intuitive Surgical Inc the worst performers on the S&P 500.HCA slumped 21.8% after reporting a downbeat profit view, while other hospital operators felt the contagion: Tenet Healthcare, Community Health Systems and Universal Health Services all tumbled between 14% and 17.9%.Surgical robot maker Intuitive Surgical dropped 14.3% after warning of weaker demand from hospitals due to tighter finances.All 11 major S&P 500 sectors were down, although the 3.6% slip by healthcare was outdone by materials, which was off 3.7%.Materials was weighed down by Nucor Corp - down 8.3% after hitting a record high after posting earnings on Thursday - and Freeport-McMoRan Inc, which slipped 6.8% as investors fretted over how interest rate hikes would impact copper miners.The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 981.36 points, or 2.82%, to 33,811.4, the S&P 500 lost 121.88 points, or 2.77%, to 4,271.78 and the Nasdaq Composite dropped 335.36 points, or 2.55%, to 12,839.29.For the week, the Dow dipped 1.9%, the S&P dropped 2.8%, and the Nasdaq declined 3.8%.The prospect of a more hawkish Fed has led to a rocky start to the year for equities, with Friday's sell-off taking declines on both the S&P and Dow since the start of the year beyond 10%.The trend is more pronounced in tech and growth shares whose valuations are more vulnerable to rising bond yields. The Nasdaq is down 17.9% in 2022.Earnings are due next week for the four biggest U.S. companies by market capitalization: Apple, Microsoft , Amazon and Google parent Alphabet.The quartet declined between 2.4% and 4.1% on Friday. Meta Platforms Inc, which also has results on deck for next week, dropped 2.1%, taking its losses in the last three days to 15.3%.Investors are worried after streaming giant Netflix Inc's dismal earnings earlier this week sent shockwaves through big tech and stay-at-home darlings which benefited from pandemic factors such as lockdown measures.The volume on U.S. exchanges was 11.66 billion shares, compared with the 11.67 billion average for the full session over the last 20 trading days.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":752,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9030637073,"gmtCreate":1645705554453,"gmtModify":1676534055435,"author":{"id":"3576444918223783","authorId":"3576444918223783","name":"Damien Khoo","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/f08d9f6bdc3c0038e9aa81591b4df363","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576444918223783","authorIdStr":"3576444918223783"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Buy high sell low&nbsp;","listText":"Buy high sell low&nbsp;","text":"Buy high sell low","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":9,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9030637073","repostId":"1161679469","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1161679469","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1645705228,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1161679469?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-02-24 20:20","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Cathie Wood Sells Another $2.4M In Palantir And $7.8M In This Social Media Company On Wednesday","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1161679469","media":"Benzinga","summary":"Cathie Wood’s Ark Investment Management sold 228,594 shares of Palantir Technologies Inc, worth near","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>Cathie Wood’s</b> Ark Investment Management sold 228,594 shares of <b>Palantir Technologies Inc</b>, worth nearly $2.4 million, on Wednesday.</p><p>Shares of the <b>Peter Thiel</b>-founded technology company slipped 2.8% to $10.14 in the after-hours session after closing 0.5% at $10.43 in regular trading on Wednesday.</p><p>With the latest sale of shares, Ark’s ownership of Palantir has effectively come down to nil.</p><p>On Tuesday, Wood had dumped $123 million worth of Palantir shares, while on Feb. 18 she had jettisoned another$148.9 million worth of stock.</p><p>Palantir missed earnings estimates earlier in February for the fourth quarter.</p><p>Ark also sold 237,143 shares of <b>Twitter Inc</b> worth $7.8 million. Twitter shares closed 0.5% lower at $32.76 in Tuesday’s regular trading and fell 1.1% to $32.41 in the after-hours session.</p><p>With the sale, the total market value of Ark’s Twitter shares across funds is now nearly $75.9 million.</p><p>On Tuesday, Twitter said it is looking to raise $1 billion through the sale of $1 billion senior notes due 2030 in a private institutional placement. The proceeds will be utilized for general corporate purposes.</p><p>The company’s board also approved a $4 billion share repurchase program earlier in February as it announced its fourth-quarter results.</p></body></html>","source":"lsy1606299360108","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Cathie Wood Sells Another $2.4M In Palantir And $7.8M In This Social Media Company On Wednesday</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nCathie Wood Sells Another $2.4M In Palantir And $7.8M In This Social Media Company On Wednesday\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-02-24 20:20 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.benzinga.com/news/22/02/25800042/cathie-wood-sells-another-2-4m-in-palantir-and-7-8m-in-this-social-media-company-on-wednesday><strong>Benzinga</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Cathie Wood’s Ark Investment Management sold 228,594 shares of Palantir Technologies Inc, worth nearly $2.4 million, on Wednesday.Shares of the Peter Thiel-founded technology company slipped 2.8% to $...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.benzinga.com/news/22/02/25800042/cathie-wood-sells-another-2-4m-in-palantir-and-7-8m-in-this-social-media-company-on-wednesday\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"PLTR":"Palantir Technologies Inc.","TWTR":"Twitter"},"source_url":"https://www.benzinga.com/news/22/02/25800042/cathie-wood-sells-another-2-4m-in-palantir-and-7-8m-in-this-social-media-company-on-wednesday","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1161679469","content_text":"Cathie Wood’s Ark Investment Management sold 228,594 shares of Palantir Technologies Inc, worth nearly $2.4 million, on Wednesday.Shares of the Peter Thiel-founded technology company slipped 2.8% to $10.14 in the after-hours session after closing 0.5% at $10.43 in regular trading on Wednesday.With the latest sale of shares, Ark’s ownership of Palantir has effectively come down to nil.On Tuesday, Wood had dumped $123 million worth of Palantir shares, while on Feb. 18 she had jettisoned another$148.9 million worth of stock.Palantir missed earnings estimates earlier in February for the fourth quarter.Ark also sold 237,143 shares of Twitter Inc worth $7.8 million. Twitter shares closed 0.5% lower at $32.76 in Tuesday’s regular trading and fell 1.1% to $32.41 in the after-hours session.With the sale, the total market value of Ark’s Twitter shares across funds is now nearly $75.9 million.On Tuesday, Twitter said it is looking to raise $1 billion through the sale of $1 billion senior notes due 2030 in a private institutional placement. The proceeds will be utilized for general corporate purposes.The company’s board also approved a $4 billion share repurchase program earlier in February as it announced its fourth-quarter results.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":509,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9095653255,"gmtCreate":1644904887723,"gmtModify":1676533974382,"author":{"id":"3576444918223783","authorId":"3576444918223783","name":"Damien Khoo","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/f08d9f6bdc3c0038e9aa81591b4df363","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576444918223783","authorIdStr":"3576444918223783"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Buy more","listText":"Buy more","text":"Buy more","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9095653255","repostId":"1188489965","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1188489965","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1644884966,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1188489965?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-02-15 08:29","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Is PLTR Stock a Buy Right Now? 3 Analysts Weigh In on Palantir Price Predictions.","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1188489965","media":"InvestorPlace","summary":"Palantir(NYSE:PLTR) stock has not exactly been having a great year, down more than 25% year to date.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>Palantir</b>(NYSE:<b><u>PLTR</u></b>) stock has not exactly been having a great year, down more than 25% year to date. With the tech sector’s poor price performance in 2022 thus far, Palantir is currently trading close to its 52-week low of $11.75. Does this mean that PLTR stock is a buy right now?</p><p>Palantir willreport earningsfor the fourth quarter on Feb. 17. Ahead of time, the company has provided guidance of 30% annual growth for the next 5 years, which would equate to revenue of at least $6 billion by 2026. However, many investors are concerned about a slowdown in commercial growth. Excluding revenue from special purpose acquisition companies (SPACs), Palantir’s Q3 commercial revenue grew by22% year over year(YOY). This revenue growth rate represents a decline from Q2’s 25% YOY growth.</p><p>Furthermore, CEO Alex Karp released his annual shareholder letter today. The letter addresses several themes, such as the prevalence of software, the company’s relationship with the U.S. government, and the problems that Palantir seeks to address. While no financial updates were provided, investors will surely receive more clarity when Palantir reports earnings.</p><p>With Palantir expected to report earnings soon, investors are wondering how Wall Street feels about PLTR stock price predictions. Let’s take a look.</p><p>PLTR Stock: 3 Analysts Weigh In On Palantir Price Predictions</p><ul><li>Credit Suisse has a price target of $25. Analyst Phil Winslow believes that Palantir’s Foundry platform could create “significant value” within commercial businesses. Winslow adds that Palantir’s biggest risk is customer concentration. Finally, the analyst notes that he would like to see evidence on the “evolution of Palantir’s go-to-market model to acquire new commercial clients” to become more bullish on the company.</li><li>Jefferies has a price target of $21. Analyst Brent Thill believes that fourth-quarter revenue will increase by 30% YOY. In addition, while acknowledging Palantir’s recent commercial revenue slowdown, the analyst believes that the “next leg of growth will likely be driven by further acceleration from the commercial business.”</li><li>William Blair has a price target between $12 and $16. Analyst Kamil Mielczarek notes that Palantir did not win any significant “new work” during the quarter that ended Sept. 30. Like Thill, Mielczarek is concerned about a slowdown in commercial growth.</li></ul></body></html>","source":"lsy1606302653667","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Is PLTR Stock a Buy Right Now? 3 Analysts Weigh In on Palantir Price Predictions.</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nIs PLTR Stock a Buy Right Now? 3 Analysts Weigh In on Palantir Price Predictions.\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-02-15 08:29 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://investorplace.com/2022/02/is-pltr-stock-a-buy-right-now-3-analysts-weigh-in-on-palantir-price-predictions/><strong>InvestorPlace</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Palantir(NYSE:PLTR) stock has not exactly been having a great year, down more than 25% year to date. With the tech sector’s poor price performance in 2022 thus far, Palantir is currently trading close...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://investorplace.com/2022/02/is-pltr-stock-a-buy-right-now-3-analysts-weigh-in-on-palantir-price-predictions/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"PLTR":"Palantir Technologies Inc."},"source_url":"https://investorplace.com/2022/02/is-pltr-stock-a-buy-right-now-3-analysts-weigh-in-on-palantir-price-predictions/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1188489965","content_text":"Palantir(NYSE:PLTR) stock has not exactly been having a great year, down more than 25% year to date. With the tech sector’s poor price performance in 2022 thus far, Palantir is currently trading close to its 52-week low of $11.75. Does this mean that PLTR stock is a buy right now?Palantir willreport earningsfor the fourth quarter on Feb. 17. Ahead of time, the company has provided guidance of 30% annual growth for the next 5 years, which would equate to revenue of at least $6 billion by 2026. However, many investors are concerned about a slowdown in commercial growth. Excluding revenue from special purpose acquisition companies (SPACs), Palantir’s Q3 commercial revenue grew by22% year over year(YOY). This revenue growth rate represents a decline from Q2’s 25% YOY growth.Furthermore, CEO Alex Karp released his annual shareholder letter today. The letter addresses several themes, such as the prevalence of software, the company’s relationship with the U.S. government, and the problems that Palantir seeks to address. While no financial updates were provided, investors will surely receive more clarity when Palantir reports earnings.With Palantir expected to report earnings soon, investors are wondering how Wall Street feels about PLTR stock price predictions. Let’s take a look.PLTR Stock: 3 Analysts Weigh In On Palantir Price PredictionsCredit Suisse has a price target of $25. Analyst Phil Winslow believes that Palantir’s Foundry platform could create “significant value” within commercial businesses. Winslow adds that Palantir’s biggest risk is customer concentration. Finally, the analyst notes that he would like to see evidence on the “evolution of Palantir’s go-to-market model to acquire new commercial clients” to become more bullish on the company.Jefferies has a price target of $21. Analyst Brent Thill believes that fourth-quarter revenue will increase by 30% YOY. In addition, while acknowledging Palantir’s recent commercial revenue slowdown, the analyst believes that the “next leg of growth will likely be driven by further acceleration from the commercial business.”William Blair has a price target between $12 and $16. Analyst Kamil Mielczarek notes that Palantir did not win any significant “new work” during the quarter that ended Sept. 30. Like Thill, Mielczarek is concerned about a slowdown in commercial growth.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":631,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9098080821,"gmtCreate":1643969827882,"gmtModify":1676533877340,"author":{"id":"3576444918223783","authorId":"3576444918223783","name":"Damien Khoo","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/f08d9f6bdc3c0038e9aa81591b4df363","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576444918223783","authorIdStr":"3576444918223783"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Premarket is cooling off","listText":"Premarket is cooling off","text":"Premarket is cooling off","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9098080821","repostId":"1184107141","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1184107141","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1643966038,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1184107141?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-02-04 17:13","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Pinterest Jumped Nearly 18% in Premarket Trading on Q4 Beat","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1184107141","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Pinterest jumped nearly 18% in premarket trading on Q4 beat. Its EPS of $0.49 came in better than th","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Pinterest jumped nearly 18% in premarket trading on Q4 beat.</p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c1929915fe25c65b9abc221c5c1ad880\" tg-width=\"769\" tg-height=\"566\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>Its EPS of $0.49 came in better than the Street estimate of $0.46. Revenue grew 20% year-over-year to $847 million, above the consensus estimate of $827.43 million. Global Monthly Active Users (MAUs) decreased 6% year-over-year to 431 million in Q4.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Pinterest Jumped Nearly 18% in Premarket Trading on Q4 Beat</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nPinterest Jumped Nearly 18% in Premarket Trading on Q4 Beat\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-02-04 17:13</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>Pinterest jumped nearly 18% in premarket trading on Q4 beat.</p><p> <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c1929915fe25c65b9abc221c5c1ad880\" tg-width=\"769\" tg-height=\"566\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>Its EPS of $0.49 came in better than the Street estimate of $0.46. Revenue grew 20% year-over-year to $847 million, above the consensus estimate of $827.43 million. Global Monthly Active Users (MAUs) decreased 6% year-over-year to 431 million in Q4.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"PINS":"Pinterest, Inc."},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1184107141","content_text":"Pinterest jumped nearly 18% in premarket trading on Q4 beat. Its EPS of $0.49 came in better than the Street estimate of $0.46. Revenue grew 20% year-over-year to $847 million, above the consensus estimate of $827.43 million. Global Monthly Active Users (MAUs) decreased 6% year-over-year to 431 million in Q4.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":632,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9098032536,"gmtCreate":1643965719744,"gmtModify":1676533876784,"author":{"id":"3576444918223783","authorId":"3576444918223783","name":"Damien Khoo","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/f08d9f6bdc3c0038e9aa81591b4df363","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576444918223783","authorIdStr":"3576444918223783"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"So what? Important is can it sustain?","listText":"So what? Important is can it sustain?","text":"So what? Important is can it sustain?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9098032536","repostId":"1149790237","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1149790237","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1643965582,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1149790237?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-02-04 17:06","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Snap Jumped Over 55% in Premarket Trading after Achieving Positive Free Cash Flow for the Year an Important Milestone","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1149790237","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Snap jumped over 55% in premarket trading after achieving positive free cash flow for the year an im","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Snap jumped over 55% in premarket trading after achieving positive free cash flow for the year an important milestone.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3e3e0161d3e9e8dfac1d3ff05a014a03\" tg-width=\"769\" tg-height=\"565\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Snap reported quarterly revenue of $1.3 billion, which beat the $1.2 billion estimate. The company reported quarterly adjusted earnings of 22 cents per share, which more than doubled the estimate of 10 cents per share.</p><p>Global daily active users totaled 319 million in the fourth quarter, representing a 20% year-over-year increase. Snap highlighted that year-over-year growth in DAUs has been 20% or more for five consecutive quarters now.</p><p>Average revenue per user reached $4.06 during the quarter, up from $3.44 in the fourth quarter of 2020.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Snap Jumped Over 55% in Premarket Trading after Achieving Positive Free Cash Flow for the Year an Important Milestone</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSnap Jumped Over 55% in Premarket Trading after Achieving Positive Free Cash Flow for the Year an Important Milestone\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-02-04 17:06</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>Snap jumped over 55% in premarket trading after achieving positive free cash flow for the year an important milestone.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3e3e0161d3e9e8dfac1d3ff05a014a03\" tg-width=\"769\" tg-height=\"565\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Snap reported quarterly revenue of $1.3 billion, which beat the $1.2 billion estimate. The company reported quarterly adjusted earnings of 22 cents per share, which more than doubled the estimate of 10 cents per share.</p><p>Global daily active users totaled 319 million in the fourth quarter, representing a 20% year-over-year increase. Snap highlighted that year-over-year growth in DAUs has been 20% or more for five consecutive quarters now.</p><p>Average revenue per user reached $4.06 during the quarter, up from $3.44 in the fourth quarter of 2020.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SNAP":"Snap Inc"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1149790237","content_text":"Snap jumped over 55% in premarket trading after achieving positive free cash flow for the year an important milestone.Snap reported quarterly revenue of $1.3 billion, which beat the $1.2 billion estimate. The company reported quarterly adjusted earnings of 22 cents per share, which more than doubled the estimate of 10 cents per share.Global daily active users totaled 319 million in the fourth quarter, representing a 20% year-over-year increase. Snap highlighted that year-over-year growth in DAUs has been 20% or more for five consecutive quarters now.Average revenue per user reached $4.06 during the quarter, up from $3.44 in the fourth quarter of 2020.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":469,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9091423512,"gmtCreate":1643932439212,"gmtModify":1676533872420,"author":{"id":"3576444918223783","authorId":"3576444918223783","name":"Damien Khoo","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/f08d9f6bdc3c0038e9aa81591b4df363","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576444918223783","authorIdStr":"3576444918223783"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"At least this time they give a guidance what they want to focus. Hopefully investors forgets about MAU growth and focus more on revenue growth.&nbsp;","listText":"At least this time they give a guidance what they want to focus. Hopefully investors forgets about MAU growth and focus more on revenue growth.&nbsp;","text":"At least this time they give a guidance what they want to focus. Hopefully investors forgets about MAU growth and focus more on revenue growth.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9091423512","repostId":"2208313788","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2208313788","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1643931901,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2208313788?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-02-04 07:45","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Pinterest Stock Up 20% on Q4 Beat","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2208313788","media":"StreetInsider","summary":"Pinterest  shares were trading 20% higher after-hours following the company’s Q4 results, with EPS o","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PINS\">Pinterest </a> shares were trading 20% higher after-hours following the company’s Q4 results, with EPS of $0.49 coming in better than the Street estimate of $0.46. Revenue grew 20% year-over-year to $847 million, above the consensus estimate of $827.43 million. Global Monthly Active Users (MAUs) decreased 6% year-over-year to 431 million in Q4.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e3124a54ea22b5577854a5cee3f3ee0\" tg-width=\"887\" tg-height=\"635\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>The exacerbated gains after-hours came as shares should off 10.3% intra-day on the back of Facebook&#39;s disappointing results.</p><p>According to Ben Silbermann, CEO and co-founder of Pinterest, the company took important steps in 2021 with the launch of its foundational technology to deliver a video-first publishing platform, and surpassed $2 billion in annual revenue for the first time, growing 52% over 2020.</p><p>The company expects its Q1/22 revenue to grow in the high teens percentage range year-over-year. For 2022, the company’s key strategic priorities are centered around creator-led and inspirational content, shopping, Pinner experience, and advertiser success.</p></body></html>","source":"highlight_streetinsider","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Pinterest Stock Up 20% on Q4 Beat</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nPinterest Stock Up 20% on Q4 Beat\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-02-04 07:45 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.streetinsider.com/dr/news.php?id=19557222><strong>StreetInsider</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Pinterest  shares were trading 20% higher after-hours following the company’s Q4 results, with EPS of $0.49 coming in better than the Street estimate of $0.46. Revenue grew 20% year-over-year to $847 ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.streetinsider.com/dr/news.php?id=19557222\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"PINS":"Pinterest, Inc.","BK4548":"巴美列捷福持仓","BK4551":"寇图资本持仓","BK4508":"社交媒体","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","BK4077":"互动媒体与服务"},"source_url":"https://www.streetinsider.com/dr/news.php?id=19557222","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2208313788","content_text":"Pinterest  shares were trading 20% higher after-hours following the company’s Q4 results, with EPS of $0.49 coming in better than the Street estimate of $0.46. Revenue grew 20% year-over-year to $847 million, above the consensus estimate of $827.43 million. Global Monthly Active Users (MAUs) decreased 6% year-over-year to 431 million in Q4.The exacerbated gains after-hours came as shares should off 10.3% intra-day on the back of Facebook's disappointing results.According to Ben Silbermann, CEO and co-founder of Pinterest, the company took important steps in 2021 with the launch of its foundational technology to deliver a video-first publishing platform, and surpassed $2 billion in annual revenue for the first time, growing 52% over 2020.The company expects its Q1/22 revenue to grow in the high teens percentage range year-over-year. For 2022, the company’s key strategic priorities are centered around creator-led and inspirational content, shopping, Pinner experience, and advertiser success.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1051,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9090853521,"gmtCreate":1643155027137,"gmtModify":1676533779185,"author":{"id":"3576444918223783","authorId":"3576444918223783","name":"Damien Khoo","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/f08d9f6bdc3c0038e9aa81591b4df363","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576444918223783","authorIdStr":"3576444918223783"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"I think the bottom is reached or near. Expecting a rebound after FOMC meeting&nbsp;","listText":"I think the bottom is reached or near. Expecting a rebound after FOMC meeting&nbsp;","text":"I think the bottom is reached or near. Expecting a rebound after FOMC meeting","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9090853521","repostId":"2206103855","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":675,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9090887554,"gmtCreate":1643152634020,"gmtModify":1676533778509,"author":{"id":"3576444918223783","authorId":"3576444918223783","name":"Damien Khoo","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/f08d9f6bdc3c0038e9aa81591b4df363","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576444918223783","authorIdStr":"3576444918223783"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Market already priced in","listText":"Market already priced in","text":"Market already priced in","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9090887554","repostId":"2206103855","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2206103855","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1643151600,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2206103855?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-01-26 07:00","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Wall Street Ends down as Markets Whipsaw Ahead of Fed Meeting","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2206103855","media":"Reuters","summary":"* Microsoft gains in after-hours trading after results* American Express, IBM rise on strong earning","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>* Microsoft gains in after-hours trading after results</p><p>* American Express, IBM rise on strong earnings</p><p>* Indexes down: Dow 0.19%, S&amp;P 1.22%, Nasdaq 2.28%</p><p>NEW YORK, Jan 25 (Reuters) - U.S. stocks gyrated in afternoon trading to close lower with interest rate sensitive tech stocks weighing most heavily as uncertainties surrounding an increasingly hawkish Federal Reserve and rising geopolitical tensions contributed to the market&#39;s churn.</p><p>In a pattern similar to Monday, U.S. stocks whipsawed between steep losses and modest gains. Equities ended well off session lows, where the S&amp;P 500 flirted once again with confirming a correction.</p><p>All three major U.S. stock indexes closed lower.</p><p>If the bellwether index closed 10% or more below its record high reached on Jan 3, it would have confirmed it entered a correction on that date. It ended the session 9.2% below that level.</p><p>&#34;We’re floating along this arbitrary 10% line, and investors are asking. &#39;Is it time to protect my capital by selling or is it time to buy the dip?&#39;,&#34; said Tom Martin, senior portfolio manager at GLOBALT in Atlanta. &#34;And between yesterday with downward and upward movement you have this battle between the two.&#34;</p><p>The CBOE Market Volatility index closed at its highest level since Jan. 29, 2021.</p><p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 66.77 points, or 0.19%, to 34,297.73, the S&amp;P 500 lost 53.68 points, or 1.22%, to 4,356.45 and the Nasdaq Composite dropped 315.83 points, or 2.28%, to 13,539.30.</p><p>The members of the Federal Open Markets Committee (FOMC) convened on Tuesday for their two-day monetary policy meeting. Market participants on Wednesday will scrutinize the statement at the meeting&#39;s conclusion, along with Chairman Jerome Powell&#39;s subsequent Q&amp;A session, for clarity regarding the central bank&#39;s timeline for hiking key interest rates to combat inflation.</p><p>&#34;Certainly, the economic data of late shows some weakening,&#34; Martin added. &#34;You would think there might be a more dovish message from the Fed.&#34;</p><p>Geopolitical tensions are adding to investor uncertainty, with NATO putting forces on standby and the United States putting troops on heightened alert in response to a buildup of Russian forces along Ukraine border.</p><p>Those tensions prompted a rise in crude oil prices on concerns over tightening supply  , which in turn gave energy companies    a solid boost.</p><p>Energy was the top gainer among the 11 major sectors in the S&amp;P 500, with tech shares suffering the largest percentage decline.</p><p>The fourth-quarter reporting season is in full-stride, with 79 of the companies in the S&amp;P 500 having reported. Of those, 81% have delivered better-than-expected results, according to Refinitiv. But there have been notable misses, such as Netflix.</p><p>Analysts now see aggregate S&amp;P 500 earnings growth of 24.1% for the October-December period, per Refinitiv.</p><p>General Electric Co fell 6.0% after the industrial conglomerate, weighed down by global supply disruptions, reported a decline quarterly revenue.</p><p>IBM advanced 5.7% after the IT giant beat quarterly Wall Street estimates on strength in its cloud and consulting businesses.</p><p>American Express exceeded fourth-quarter profit estimates, sending the consumer credit company&#39;s stock up 8.9%, while Johnson &amp; Johnson gained 2.9% after reporting it expects a jump of as much as 46% in 2022 vaccine sales.</p><p>Shares of Microsoft climbed 3% after plunging 6% at one point in extended trading after the software maker reported its quarterly results.</p><p>Declining issues outnumbered advancing ones on the NYSE by a 1.34-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 1.53-to-1 ratio favored decliners.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 posted seven new 52-week highs and four new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 19 new highs and 134 new lows.</p><p>Volume on U.S. exchanges was 13.13 billion shares, compared with the 11.23 billion average over the last 20 trading days.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Wall Street Ends down as Markets Whipsaw Ahead of Fed Meeting</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWall Street Ends down as Markets Whipsaw Ahead of Fed Meeting\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-01-26 07:00</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>* Microsoft gains in after-hours trading after results</p><p>* American Express, IBM rise on strong earnings</p><p>* Indexes down: Dow 0.19%, S&amp;P 1.22%, Nasdaq 2.28%</p><p>NEW YORK, Jan 25 (Reuters) - U.S. stocks gyrated in afternoon trading to close lower with interest rate sensitive tech stocks weighing most heavily as uncertainties surrounding an increasingly hawkish Federal Reserve and rising geopolitical tensions contributed to the market&#39;s churn.</p><p>In a pattern similar to Monday, U.S. stocks whipsawed between steep losses and modest gains. Equities ended well off session lows, where the S&amp;P 500 flirted once again with confirming a correction.</p><p>All three major U.S. stock indexes closed lower.</p><p>If the bellwether index closed 10% or more below its record high reached on Jan 3, it would have confirmed it entered a correction on that date. It ended the session 9.2% below that level.</p><p>&#34;We’re floating along this arbitrary 10% line, and investors are asking. &#39;Is it time to protect my capital by selling or is it time to buy the dip?&#39;,&#34; said Tom Martin, senior portfolio manager at GLOBALT in Atlanta. &#34;And between yesterday with downward and upward movement you have this battle between the two.&#34;</p><p>The CBOE Market Volatility index closed at its highest level since Jan. 29, 2021.</p><p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 66.77 points, or 0.19%, to 34,297.73, the S&amp;P 500 lost 53.68 points, or 1.22%, to 4,356.45 and the Nasdaq Composite dropped 315.83 points, or 2.28%, to 13,539.30.</p><p>The members of the Federal Open Markets Committee (FOMC) convened on Tuesday for their two-day monetary policy meeting. Market participants on Wednesday will scrutinize the statement at the meeting&#39;s conclusion, along with Chairman Jerome Powell&#39;s subsequent Q&amp;A session, for clarity regarding the central bank&#39;s timeline for hiking key interest rates to combat inflation.</p><p>&#34;Certainly, the economic data of late shows some weakening,&#34; Martin added. &#34;You would think there might be a more dovish message from the Fed.&#34;</p><p>Geopolitical tensions are adding to investor uncertainty, with NATO putting forces on standby and the United States putting troops on heightened alert in response to a buildup of Russian forces along Ukraine border.</p><p>Those tensions prompted a rise in crude oil prices on concerns over tightening supply  , which in turn gave energy companies    a solid boost.</p><p>Energy was the top gainer among the 11 major sectors in the S&amp;P 500, with tech shares suffering the largest percentage decline.</p><p>The fourth-quarter reporting season is in full-stride, with 79 of the companies in the S&amp;P 500 having reported. Of those, 81% have delivered better-than-expected results, according to Refinitiv. But there have been notable misses, such as Netflix.</p><p>Analysts now see aggregate S&amp;P 500 earnings growth of 24.1% for the October-December period, per Refinitiv.</p><p>General Electric Co fell 6.0% after the industrial conglomerate, weighed down by global supply disruptions, reported a decline quarterly revenue.</p><p>IBM advanced 5.7% after the IT giant beat quarterly Wall Street estimates on strength in its cloud and consulting businesses.</p><p>American Express exceeded fourth-quarter profit estimates, sending the consumer credit company&#39;s stock up 8.9%, while Johnson &amp; Johnson gained 2.9% after reporting it expects a jump of as much as 46% in 2022 vaccine sales.</p><p>Shares of Microsoft climbed 3% after plunging 6% at one point in extended trading after the software maker reported its quarterly results.</p><p>Declining issues outnumbered advancing ones on the NYSE by a 1.34-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 1.53-to-1 ratio favored decliners.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 posted seven new 52-week highs and four new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 19 new highs and 134 new lows.</p><p>Volume on U.S. exchanges was 13.13 billion shares, compared with the 11.23 billion average over the last 20 trading days.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"MSFT":"微软","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite","BK4503":"景林资产持仓","BK4134":"信息科技咨询与其它服务",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","BK4097":"系统软件","SPY":"标普500ETF","BK4504":"桥水持仓","FOMC":"FOMO CORP.","BK4548":"巴美列捷福持仓","BK4516":"特朗普概念","BK4559":"巴菲特持仓","BK4528":"SaaS概念","BK4532":"文艺复兴科技持仓","BK4538":"云计算","BK4554":"元宇宙及AR概念","BK4567":"ESG概念","BK4077":"互动媒体与服务","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","BK4533":"AQR资本管理(全球第二大对冲基金)","BK4566":"资本集团","BK4525":"远程办公概念","BK4535":"淡马锡持仓","IBM":"IBM","BK4527":"明星科技股",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2206103855","content_text":"* Microsoft gains in after-hours trading after results* American Express, IBM rise on strong earnings* Indexes down: Dow 0.19%, S&P 1.22%, Nasdaq 2.28%NEW YORK, Jan 25 (Reuters) - U.S. stocks gyrated in afternoon trading to close lower with interest rate sensitive tech stocks weighing most heavily as uncertainties surrounding an increasingly hawkish Federal Reserve and rising geopolitical tensions contributed to the market's churn.In a pattern similar to Monday, U.S. stocks whipsawed between steep losses and modest gains. Equities ended well off session lows, where the S&P 500 flirted once again with confirming a correction.All three major U.S. stock indexes closed lower.If the bellwether index closed 10% or more below its record high reached on Jan 3, it would have confirmed it entered a correction on that date. It ended the session 9.2% below that level.\"We’re floating along this arbitrary 10% line, and investors are asking. 'Is it time to protect my capital by selling or is it time to buy the dip?',\" said Tom Martin, senior portfolio manager at GLOBALT in Atlanta. \"And between yesterday with downward and upward movement you have this battle between the two.\"The CBOE Market Volatility index closed at its highest level since Jan. 29, 2021.The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 66.77 points, or 0.19%, to 34,297.73, the S&P 500 lost 53.68 points, or 1.22%, to 4,356.45 and the Nasdaq Composite dropped 315.83 points, or 2.28%, to 13,539.30.The members of the Federal Open Markets Committee (FOMC) convened on Tuesday for their two-day monetary policy meeting. Market participants on Wednesday will scrutinize the statement at the meeting's conclusion, along with Chairman Jerome Powell's subsequent Q&A session, for clarity regarding the central bank's timeline for hiking key interest rates to combat inflation.\"Certainly, the economic data of late shows some weakening,\" Martin added. \"You would think there might be a more dovish message from the Fed.\"Geopolitical tensions are adding to investor uncertainty, with NATO putting forces on standby and the United States putting troops on heightened alert in response to a buildup of Russian forces along Ukraine border.Those tensions prompted a rise in crude oil prices on concerns over tightening supply  , which in turn gave energy companies    a solid boost.Energy was the top gainer among the 11 major sectors in the S&P 500, with tech shares suffering the largest percentage decline.The fourth-quarter reporting season is in full-stride, with 79 of the companies in the S&P 500 having reported. Of those, 81% have delivered better-than-expected results, according to Refinitiv. But there have been notable misses, such as Netflix.Analysts now see aggregate S&P 500 earnings growth of 24.1% for the October-December period, per Refinitiv.General Electric Co fell 6.0% after the industrial conglomerate, weighed down by global supply disruptions, reported a decline quarterly revenue.IBM advanced 5.7% after the IT giant beat quarterly Wall Street estimates on strength in its cloud and consulting businesses.American Express exceeded fourth-quarter profit estimates, sending the consumer credit company's stock up 8.9%, while Johnson & Johnson gained 2.9% after reporting it expects a jump of as much as 46% in 2022 vaccine sales.Shares of Microsoft climbed 3% after plunging 6% at one point in extended trading after the software maker reported its quarterly results.Declining issues outnumbered advancing ones on the NYSE by a 1.34-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 1.53-to-1 ratio favored decliners.The S&P 500 posted seven new 52-week highs and four new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 19 new highs and 134 new lows.Volume on U.S. exchanges was 13.13 billion shares, compared with the 11.23 billion average over the last 20 trading days.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":519,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9007854625,"gmtCreate":1642839525731,"gmtModify":1676533751870,"author":{"id":"3576444918223783","authorId":"3576444918223783","name":"Damien Khoo","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/f08d9f6bdc3c0038e9aa81591b4df363","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576444918223783","authorIdStr":"3576444918223783"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/NVAX\">$Novavax(NVAX)$</a>WT...","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/NVAX\">$Novavax(NVAX)$</a>WT...","text":"$Novavax(NVAX)$WT...","images":[{"img":"https://static.itradeup.com/news/e1e82a5267f0263353ddaea611ea37f2","width":"1125","height":"2196"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9007854625","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1512,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9007833985,"gmtCreate":1642819609957,"gmtModify":1676533750151,"author":{"id":"3576444918223783","authorId":"3576444918223783","name":"Damien Khoo","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/f08d9f6bdc3c0038e9aa81591b4df363","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576444918223783","authorIdStr":"3576444918223783"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"50% down&nbsp;","listText":"50% down&nbsp;","text":"50% down","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9007833985","repostId":"2205441860","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2205441860","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1642808308,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2205441860?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-01-22 07:38","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why I Sold These 3 High-Growth Tech Stocks","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2205441860","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"I recently sold my shares of Snap, Palantir, and Bumble. Let's explore the reasons I pulled the trigger on the sales.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Rising inflation and higher interest rates have crushed many high-growth tech stocks over the past few months. The reasons are simple: Inflation reduces the value of a company&#39;s future revenue and earnings, while higher interest rates boost borrowing costs for unprofitable companies.</p><p>Like many investors, I reduced my exposure to that shift by selling some of my higher-growth tech stocks and rotating toward more conservative investments. Specifically, I took profits from my investments in <b>Snap</b> (NYSE:SNAP) and <b>Palantir</b> (NYSE:PLTR), but I took a net loss on <b>Bumble</b> (NASDAQ:BMBL).</p><p>Investors should do their own due diligence instead of following my example, but let me explain my logic for selling these three high-growth tech stocks.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/869992e71713ee11433514b27cb91bce\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>Image source: Getty Images.</p><h2>1. Snap</h2><p>Snap was once my favorite social media stock. It generated robust growth in daily active users and revenue, it remained a top app for teen users, and its profitability was gradually improving.</p><p>But over the past year, several red flags appeared. It vastly underestimated the impact of<b> Apple</b>&#39;s privacy update on iOS, set unrealistic growth targets at its investor day last February, and failed to outshine <b>ByteDance</b>&#39;s TikTok with Spotlight&#39;s short videos.</p><p>Snap&#39;s third-quarter numbers and fourth-quarter guidance last October strongly suggested it couldn&#39;t achieve its investor day target for 50% annual revenue growth over the next few years. But Snap didn&#39;t withdraw that guidance -- even after directly being questioned about it during its conference call -- and said it could retool its ads to overcome Apple&#39;s iOS changes.</p><p>Over the past three months, Snap&#39;s insiders still sold 22 times as many shares as they bought -- even as the stock price dropped more than 50%. That lack of confidence indicates its iOS headaches won&#39;t end anytime soon.</p><p>Snap might seem reasonably valued now at 10 times next year&#39;s sales, especially if it meets analysts&#39; estimates for 60% revenue growth in 2021 and 38% growth in 2022. Unfortunately, I think Snap could continue to struggle over the next few quarters and ultimately withdraw its 50% revenue growth guidance. When that happens, the stock will likely plummet to new lows.</p><h2>2. Palantir</h2><p>Palantir, the data analytics firm which serves the U.S. government and large enterprise customers, also has ambitious growth plans. It believes it can generate at least 30% annual revenue growth from 2021 to 2025.</p><p>At first glance, Palantir seems like a solid investment. The U.S. Army reportedly used its Gotham platform to hunt down Osama Bin Laden in 2011. That battle-hardened reputation enables it to promote its enterprise-facing Foundry platform to large companies. Its ability to gather data from disparate sources can help government agencies and companies make better data-driven decisions to streamline their operations.</p><p>But Palantir also has some glaring problems. It&#39;s deeply unprofitable but still trades at 15 times next year&#39;s sales, which leaves it highly exposed to rising inflation and higher interest rates. It&#39;s also constantly diluting its shares with big stock bonuses -- in the first nine months of 2021, its number of weighted-average shares jumped 165% year over year.</p><p>The growth of Gotham is also decelerating as the U.S. government quietly develops in-house alternatives. Enterprise customers could also gravitate toward other analytics services, such as <b>Alteryx</b> or <b>Splunk, </b>instead of its Foundry platform.</p><p>Instead of sticking with this speculative and unprofitable company, it might be smarter for investors to rotate back toward firmly profitable blue-chip tech stocks which will benefit from the same data-mining tailwinds.</p><h2>3. Bumble</h2><p>After defending Bumble for nearly a year, I finally realized that the online dating company&#39;s weaknesses outweighed its strengths. The growth of Bumble&#39;s namesake app, which lets women make the first move, is decelerating. Its secondary app, Badoo, continues to lose paid users.</p><p>Last quarter, Bumble&#39;s total number of paid users across both apps grew 20% year over year to 1.53 million, but that marked a deceleration from its 36% growth in the previous quarter. Meanwhile, <b>Match Group</b>&#39;s (NASDAQ:MTCH) total number of paying users, 64% of whom use Tinder, increased 16% year over year to 16.3 million in its latest quarter. The company actually accelerated from its 15% growth in the previous quarter.</p><p>Bumble also remains unprofitable, and it&#39;s shouldering <i>more than twice</i> as much debt as its total cash and equivalents. At the same time, it&#39;s pursuing scattershot strategies -- including opening a restaurant in New York City, selling branded apparel and products through an online store, and rebooting its BFF feature (for platonic friendships) as a vaguely defined metaverse platform.</p><p>Those plans probably won&#39;t widen Bumble&#39;s moat against Match&#39;s portfolio of over a dozen dating apps. After listening to its latest conference call, it became painfully clear that Bumble overestimated its own brand appeal while underestimating the competition.</p><p>Bumble expects its revenue to grow 31% to 32% this fiscal year, but that&#39;s only a bit faster than Match&#39;s projected revenue growth rate of 25%. Bumble&#39;s stock might seem reasonably valued at six times next year&#39;s sales, but it probably won&#39;t command a higher premium until it stabilizes its user growth and significantly narrows its net losses. Until that happens, Match will probably be the better overall investment.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why I Sold These 3 High-Growth Tech Stocks</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy I Sold These 3 High-Growth Tech Stocks\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-01-22 07:38 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/01/21/why-i-sold-these-3-high-growth-tech-stocks/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Rising inflation and higher interest rates have crushed many high-growth tech stocks over the past few months. The reasons are simple: Inflation reduces the value of a company's future revenue and ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/01/21/why-i-sold-these-3-high-growth-tech-stocks/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BK4533":"AQR资本管理(全球第二大对冲基金)","BK4566":"资本集团","BK4508":"社交媒体","BK4501":"段永平概念","BK4559":"巴菲特持仓","BK4527":"明星科技股","BK4077":"互动媒体与服务","BK4543":"AI","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓","PLTR":"Palantir Technologies Inc.","BK4551":"寇图资本持仓","BK4505":"高瓴资本持仓","BK4547":"WSB热门概念","AAPL":"苹果","BMBL":"Bumble Inc.","BK4549":"软银资本持仓","BK4170":"电脑硬件、储存设备及电脑周边","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","BK4023":"应用软件","MTCH":"Match Group, Inc.","BK4515":"5G概念","BK4554":"元宇宙及AR概念","SNAP":"Snap Inc","BK4532":"文艺复兴科技持仓","BK4553":"喜马拉雅资本持仓","BK4507":"流媒体概念"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/01/21/why-i-sold-these-3-high-growth-tech-stocks/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2205441860","content_text":"Rising inflation and higher interest rates have crushed many high-growth tech stocks over the past few months. The reasons are simple: Inflation reduces the value of a company's future revenue and earnings, while higher interest rates boost borrowing costs for unprofitable companies.Like many investors, I reduced my exposure to that shift by selling some of my higher-growth tech stocks and rotating toward more conservative investments. Specifically, I took profits from my investments in Snap (NYSE:SNAP) and Palantir (NYSE:PLTR), but I took a net loss on Bumble (NASDAQ:BMBL).Investors should do their own due diligence instead of following my example, but let me explain my logic for selling these three high-growth tech stocks.Image source: Getty Images.1. SnapSnap was once my favorite social media stock. It generated robust growth in daily active users and revenue, it remained a top app for teen users, and its profitability was gradually improving.But over the past year, several red flags appeared. It vastly underestimated the impact of Apple's privacy update on iOS, set unrealistic growth targets at its investor day last February, and failed to outshine ByteDance's TikTok with Spotlight's short videos.Snap's third-quarter numbers and fourth-quarter guidance last October strongly suggested it couldn't achieve its investor day target for 50% annual revenue growth over the next few years. But Snap didn't withdraw that guidance -- even after directly being questioned about it during its conference call -- and said it could retool its ads to overcome Apple's iOS changes.Over the past three months, Snap's insiders still sold 22 times as many shares as they bought -- even as the stock price dropped more than 50%. That lack of confidence indicates its iOS headaches won't end anytime soon.Snap might seem reasonably valued now at 10 times next year's sales, especially if it meets analysts' estimates for 60% revenue growth in 2021 and 38% growth in 2022. Unfortunately, I think Snap could continue to struggle over the next few quarters and ultimately withdraw its 50% revenue growth guidance. When that happens, the stock will likely plummet to new lows.2. PalantirPalantir, the data analytics firm which serves the U.S. government and large enterprise customers, also has ambitious growth plans. It believes it can generate at least 30% annual revenue growth from 2021 to 2025.At first glance, Palantir seems like a solid investment. The U.S. Army reportedly used its Gotham platform to hunt down Osama Bin Laden in 2011. That battle-hardened reputation enables it to promote its enterprise-facing Foundry platform to large companies. Its ability to gather data from disparate sources can help government agencies and companies make better data-driven decisions to streamline their operations.But Palantir also has some glaring problems. It's deeply unprofitable but still trades at 15 times next year's sales, which leaves it highly exposed to rising inflation and higher interest rates. It's also constantly diluting its shares with big stock bonuses -- in the first nine months of 2021, its number of weighted-average shares jumped 165% year over year.The growth of Gotham is also decelerating as the U.S. government quietly develops in-house alternatives. Enterprise customers could also gravitate toward other analytics services, such as Alteryx or Splunk, instead of its Foundry platform.Instead of sticking with this speculative and unprofitable company, it might be smarter for investors to rotate back toward firmly profitable blue-chip tech stocks which will benefit from the same data-mining tailwinds.3. BumbleAfter defending Bumble for nearly a year, I finally realized that the online dating company's weaknesses outweighed its strengths. The growth of Bumble's namesake app, which lets women make the first move, is decelerating. Its secondary app, Badoo, continues to lose paid users.Last quarter, Bumble's total number of paid users across both apps grew 20% year over year to 1.53 million, but that marked a deceleration from its 36% growth in the previous quarter. Meanwhile, Match Group's (NASDAQ:MTCH) total number of paying users, 64% of whom use Tinder, increased 16% year over year to 16.3 million in its latest quarter. The company actually accelerated from its 15% growth in the previous quarter.Bumble also remains unprofitable, and it's shouldering more than twice as much debt as its total cash and equivalents. At the same time, it's pursuing scattershot strategies -- including opening a restaurant in New York City, selling branded apparel and products through an online store, and rebooting its BFF feature (for platonic friendships) as a vaguely defined metaverse platform.Those plans probably won't widen Bumble's moat against Match's portfolio of over a dozen dating apps. After listening to its latest conference call, it became painfully clear that Bumble overestimated its own brand appeal while underestimating the competition.Bumble expects its revenue to grow 31% to 32% this fiscal year, but that's only a bit faster than Match's projected revenue growth rate of 25%. Bumble's stock might seem reasonably valued at six times next year's sales, but it probably won't command a higher premium until it stabilizes its user growth and significantly narrows its net losses. Until that happens, Match will probably be the better overall investment.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":479,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":894111854,"gmtCreate":1628811189878,"gmtModify":1676529859936,"author":{"id":"3576444918223783","authorId":"3576444918223783","name":"Damien Khoo","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/f08d9f6bdc3c0038e9aa81591b4df363","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576444918223783","authorIdStr":"3576444918223783"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Everyday I’m asking myself, how high can it continue?","listText":"Everyday I’m asking myself, how high can it continue?","text":"Everyday I’m asking myself, how high can it continue?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":11,"commentSize":6,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/894111854","repostId":"1180393666","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":110,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[{"author":{"id":"4087829320241190","authorId":"4087829320241190","name":"CYKuan","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/a600e1308bcb427dcbe9716594333839","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"idStr":"4087829320241190","authorIdStr":"4087829320241190"},"content":"Good company will last high with minor downfall","text":"Good company will last high with minor downfall","html":"Good company will last high with minor downfall"}],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9007854625,"gmtCreate":1642839525731,"gmtModify":1676533751870,"author":{"id":"3576444918223783","authorId":"3576444918223783","name":"Damien Khoo","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/f08d9f6bdc3c0038e9aa81591b4df363","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576444918223783","authorIdStr":"3576444918223783"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/NVAX\">$Novavax(NVAX)$</a>WT...","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/NVAX\">$Novavax(NVAX)$</a>WT...","text":"$Novavax(NVAX)$WT...","images":[{"img":"https://static.itradeup.com/news/e1e82a5267f0263353ddaea611ea37f2","width":"1125","height":"2196"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9007854625","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1512,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":836408337,"gmtCreate":1629511539629,"gmtModify":1676530062047,"author":{"id":"3576444918223783","authorId":"3576444918223783","name":"Damien Khoo","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/f08d9f6bdc3c0038e9aa81591b4df363","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576444918223783","authorIdStr":"3576444918223783"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"It tells historians that bulls can run very longdistance.&nbsp;","listText":"It tells historians that bulls can run very longdistance.&nbsp;","text":"It tells historians that bulls can run very longdistance.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/836408337","repostId":"2161745814","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2161745814","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1629493200,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2161745814?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-08-21 05:00","market":"hk","language":"en","title":"S&P 500 hasn't fallen 5% from a peak in nearly 200 sessions--what that tells market historians","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2161745814","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"It is an unbearable lightness of being for the S&P 500 index.\nThe broad-market measure of a basket o","content":"<p>It is an unbearable lightness of being for the S&amp;P 500 index.</p>\n<p>The broad-market measure of a basket of 500 U.S. stocks has been preternaturally resistant to pullbacks of late, despite concerns about the spread of the highly transmissible delta variant of COVID-19 and worries that the Federal Reserve’s strategy to reduce its bond purchases may be ill-timed.</p>\n<p>Yet, the S&amp;P 500 indexSPX,+0.81%has seen a largely uninterrupted ascent to such a degree that Friday marked the 200th session without a drawdown of 5% or more from a recent peak, making the current stretch of levitation the longest such since 2016, when the market went 404 sessions without falling by at least 5% peak to trough.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d5d7a23827730d58001a0b40420acd79\" tg-width=\"981\" tg-height=\"437\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">It is extremely rare for the market to enjoy such a period of relative effervescence. Indeed, such lengthy stretches without a 5% pullback or better have occurred on only eight occasions in the S&amp;P 500 index, the attached table shows.</p>\n<p>There clearly are reasons why the market is clambering higher in the recovery from COVID, set againsta daunting wall of worry. Investors are jockeying between areas of the market that are expected to boost revenue and profit faster than the rest of the pack and those that are beaten down and might benefit from a fuller economic rebound from coronavirus.</p>\n<p>Buying on Monday helped the Dow Jones Industrial AverageDJIA,+0.65%and the S&amp;P 500 indexSPX,+0.81%produce their 35th and 49th record all-time closing highs of 2021, respectively. Meanwhile, the Nasdaq Composite IndexCOMP,+1.19%stands a little over 2.5% from its record high put in on Aug. 5.</p>\n<p>There is, of course, a sense that the party for stocks can’t last forever.</p>\n<p>So, how does the market tend to perform in period after such a protracted bullish run?</p>\n<p>The data set is very small but the S&amp;P 500 has mostly climbed on a median basis, falling 1.2% in the following year but producing a median gain of 17.6% in a two-year period and 55% in the ensuing five-year period. The mean average return is better, showing a gain of 6.5%, 27.4% and 64%, respectively.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d556c67fc01e330a57abb4c65802c29d\" tg-width=\"964\" tg-height=\"626\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>S&P 500 hasn't fallen 5% from a peak in nearly 200 sessions--what that tells market historians</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nS&P 500 hasn't fallen 5% from a peak in nearly 200 sessions--what that tells market historians\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-08-21 05:00</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>It is an unbearable lightness of being for the S&amp;P 500 index.</p>\n<p>The broad-market measure of a basket of 500 U.S. stocks has been preternaturally resistant to pullbacks of late, despite concerns about the spread of the highly transmissible delta variant of COVID-19 and worries that the Federal Reserve’s strategy to reduce its bond purchases may be ill-timed.</p>\n<p>Yet, the S&amp;P 500 indexSPX,+0.81%has seen a largely uninterrupted ascent to such a degree that Friday marked the 200th session without a drawdown of 5% or more from a recent peak, making the current stretch of levitation the longest such since 2016, when the market went 404 sessions without falling by at least 5% peak to trough.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d5d7a23827730d58001a0b40420acd79\" tg-width=\"981\" tg-height=\"437\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\">It is extremely rare for the market to enjoy such a period of relative effervescence. Indeed, such lengthy stretches without a 5% pullback or better have occurred on only eight occasions in the S&amp;P 500 index, the attached table shows.</p>\n<p>There clearly are reasons why the market is clambering higher in the recovery from COVID, set againsta daunting wall of worry. Investors are jockeying between areas of the market that are expected to boost revenue and profit faster than the rest of the pack and those that are beaten down and might benefit from a fuller economic rebound from coronavirus.</p>\n<p>Buying on Monday helped the Dow Jones Industrial AverageDJIA,+0.65%and the S&amp;P 500 indexSPX,+0.81%produce their 35th and 49th record all-time closing highs of 2021, respectively. Meanwhile, the Nasdaq Composite IndexCOMP,+1.19%stands a little over 2.5% from its record high put in on Aug. 5.</p>\n<p>There is, of course, a sense that the party for stocks can’t last forever.</p>\n<p>So, how does the market tend to perform in period after such a protracted bullish run?</p>\n<p>The data set is very small but the S&amp;P 500 has mostly climbed on a median basis, falling 1.2% in the following year but producing a median gain of 17.6% in a two-year period and 55% in the ensuing five-year period. The mean average return is better, showing a gain of 6.5%, 27.4% and 64%, respectively.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d556c67fc01e330a57abb4c65802c29d\" tg-width=\"964\" tg-height=\"626\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"161125":"标普500","513500":"标普500ETF","UPRO":"三倍做多标普500ETF","SSO":"两倍做多标普500ETF","SH":"标普500反向ETF","IVV":"标普500指数ETF","SDS":"两倍做空标普500ETF","OEF":"标普100指数ETF-iShares","SPY":"标普500ETF",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","SPXU":"三倍做空标普500ETF","OEX":"标普100"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2161745814","content_text":"It is an unbearable lightness of being for the S&P 500 index.\nThe broad-market measure of a basket of 500 U.S. stocks has been preternaturally resistant to pullbacks of late, despite concerns about the spread of the highly transmissible delta variant of COVID-19 and worries that the Federal Reserve’s strategy to reduce its bond purchases may be ill-timed.\nYet, the S&P 500 indexSPX,+0.81%has seen a largely uninterrupted ascent to such a degree that Friday marked the 200th session without a drawdown of 5% or more from a recent peak, making the current stretch of levitation the longest such since 2016, when the market went 404 sessions without falling by at least 5% peak to trough.\nIt is extremely rare for the market to enjoy such a period of relative effervescence. Indeed, such lengthy stretches without a 5% pullback or better have occurred on only eight occasions in the S&P 500 index, the attached table shows.\nThere clearly are reasons why the market is clambering higher in the recovery from COVID, set againsta daunting wall of worry. Investors are jockeying between areas of the market that are expected to boost revenue and profit faster than the rest of the pack and those that are beaten down and might benefit from a fuller economic rebound from coronavirus.\nBuying on Monday helped the Dow Jones Industrial AverageDJIA,+0.65%and the S&P 500 indexSPX,+0.81%produce their 35th and 49th record all-time closing highs of 2021, respectively. Meanwhile, the Nasdaq Composite IndexCOMP,+1.19%stands a little over 2.5% from its record high put in on Aug. 5.\nThere is, of course, a sense that the party for stocks can’t last forever.\nSo, how does the market tend to perform in period after such a protracted bullish run?\nThe data set is very small but the S&P 500 has mostly climbed on a median basis, falling 1.2% in the following year but producing a median gain of 17.6% in a two-year period and 55% in the ensuing five-year period. The mean average return is better, showing a gain of 6.5%, 27.4% and 64%, respectively.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":130,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":801259590,"gmtCreate":1627519917810,"gmtModify":1703491498012,"author":{"id":"3576444918223783","authorId":"3576444918223783","name":"Damien Khoo","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/f08d9f6bdc3c0038e9aa81591b4df363","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576444918223783","authorIdStr":"3576444918223783"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"I am sure the “dip buying army” already&nbsp;see this coming a few months back. Plan the trade and execute as planned.&nbsp;","listText":"I am sure the “dip buying army” already&nbsp;see this coming a few months back. Plan the trade and execute as planned.&nbsp;","text":"I am sure the “dip buying army” already see this coming a few months back. Plan the trade and execute as planned.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/801259590","repostId":"2155027927","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2155027927","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1627519403,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2155027927?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-29 08:43","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Small-time traders turn 'dip buyers' in China share selloff","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2155027927","media":"Reuters","summary":"July 28 (Reuters) - Small-time traders have been jumping in to buy stocks discarded by big investors","content":"<p>July 28 (Reuters) - Small-time traders have been jumping in to buy stocks discarded by big investors during the selloff triggered by <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CAAS\">China</a>'s regulatory crackdown, research showed on Wednesday.</p>\n<p>Vanda, an independent research house, said its data showed subdued retail trader activity earlier in the week, but just as fears of contagion from China spilled over to Wall Street, \"the dip-buying army\" reappeared.</p>\n<p>Vanda's data is tracked globally but U.S.-based traders likely comprise the biggest chunk of it.</p>\n<p>Their buying may help to stabilise U.S.-listed Chinese shares after several days of selling driven by Beijing's move to tighten regulations on the technology and education sectors.</p>\n<p>The <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NDAQ\">Nasdaq</a> Golden Dragon China benchmark of tech stocks rebounded 8% on Wednesday after four days of falls.</p>\n<p>Vanda said U.S.-listed shares of three Chinese companies -- electric vehicle makers Nio and Xpeng , and tech giant <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BABA\">Alibaba</a> -- were among the six biggest bought stocks by U.S. retail investors on Tuesday, attracting net inflows worth a combined $194 million.</p>\n<p>Those shares have fallen between 12% and 17% at their lowest point this week compared with Friday's close.</p>\n<p>Overall, stocks impacted by the regulatory crackdown had seen combined retail inflows of $239 million, roughly 14% of total retail purchases on the day, Vanda said.</p>\n<p>The data could signal that while professional investors had turned wary about China, retail traders had sensed an opportunity.</p>\n<p>Retail traders have shot to prominence this year after big bets on heavily shorted stocks such as video game retailer <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GME\">GameStop</a> or cinema chain AMC , driving huge rallies in relatively obscure shares and heaped losses on several big-name hedge funds.</p>\n<p>But the buying of newly cheap Chinese shares implies a shift in the retail traders' behaviour, Vanda analysts Ben Onatibia and Giacomo Pierantoni noted.</p>\n<p>\"From driving triple-digit returns in high multiple stocks, they have turned into dip buyers in underperforming ones,\" they told clients.</p>\n<p>\"Financials, energy and reopening are a few of the sectors where they've cushioned institutional selling.\"</p>\n<p>Households are the biggest investors in the <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/UBNK\">United</a> States and own 37% of the equity market, according to data published by Barclays. Research has also shown that U.S. stimulus checks to households have found their way into the equity market.</p>\n<p>Reddit, popular with day traders for stock tips, contained discussions on the Chinese share slump, with comments from a few interested buyers.</p>\n<p>But mainstream investors are likely to remain cautious in the face of greater regulatory uncertainty.</p>\n<p>\"The de-rating of tech stocks is here to stay for some time. I don't expect multiples to go up anytime soon,\" said Gael Combes, head of fundamental research equities at Unigestion.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Small-time traders turn 'dip buyers' in China share selloff</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSmall-time traders turn 'dip buyers' in China share selloff\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-07-29 08:43</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>July 28 (Reuters) - Small-time traders have been jumping in to buy stocks discarded by big investors during the selloff triggered by <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CAAS\">China</a>'s regulatory crackdown, research showed on Wednesday.</p>\n<p>Vanda, an independent research house, said its data showed subdued retail trader activity earlier in the week, but just as fears of contagion from China spilled over to Wall Street, \"the dip-buying army\" reappeared.</p>\n<p>Vanda's data is tracked globally but U.S.-based traders likely comprise the biggest chunk of it.</p>\n<p>Their buying may help to stabilise U.S.-listed Chinese shares after several days of selling driven by Beijing's move to tighten regulations on the technology and education sectors.</p>\n<p>The <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NDAQ\">Nasdaq</a> Golden Dragon China benchmark of tech stocks rebounded 8% on Wednesday after four days of falls.</p>\n<p>Vanda said U.S.-listed shares of three Chinese companies -- electric vehicle makers Nio and Xpeng , and tech giant <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BABA\">Alibaba</a> -- were among the six biggest bought stocks by U.S. retail investors on Tuesday, attracting net inflows worth a combined $194 million.</p>\n<p>Those shares have fallen between 12% and 17% at their lowest point this week compared with Friday's close.</p>\n<p>Overall, stocks impacted by the regulatory crackdown had seen combined retail inflows of $239 million, roughly 14% of total retail purchases on the day, Vanda said.</p>\n<p>The data could signal that while professional investors had turned wary about China, retail traders had sensed an opportunity.</p>\n<p>Retail traders have shot to prominence this year after big bets on heavily shorted stocks such as video game retailer <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GME\">GameStop</a> or cinema chain AMC , driving huge rallies in relatively obscure shares and heaped losses on several big-name hedge funds.</p>\n<p>But the buying of newly cheap Chinese shares implies a shift in the retail traders' behaviour, Vanda analysts Ben Onatibia and Giacomo Pierantoni noted.</p>\n<p>\"From driving triple-digit returns in high multiple stocks, they have turned into dip buyers in underperforming ones,\" they told clients.</p>\n<p>\"Financials, energy and reopening are a few of the sectors where they've cushioned institutional selling.\"</p>\n<p>Households are the biggest investors in the <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/UBNK\">United</a> States and own 37% of the equity market, according to data published by Barclays. Research has also shown that U.S. stimulus checks to households have found their way into the equity market.</p>\n<p>Reddit, popular with day traders for stock tips, contained discussions on the Chinese share slump, with comments from a few interested buyers.</p>\n<p>But mainstream investors are likely to remain cautious in the face of greater regulatory uncertainty.</p>\n<p>\"The de-rating of tech stocks is here to stay for some time. I don't expect multiples to go up anytime soon,\" said Gael Combes, head of fundamental research equities at Unigestion.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BABA":"阿里巴巴","NIO":"蔚来","GME":"游戏驿站","XPEV":"小鹏汽车","AMC":"AMC院线"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2155027927","content_text":"July 28 (Reuters) - Small-time traders have been jumping in to buy stocks discarded by big investors during the selloff triggered by China's regulatory crackdown, research showed on Wednesday.\nVanda, an independent research house, said its data showed subdued retail trader activity earlier in the week, but just as fears of contagion from China spilled over to Wall Street, \"the dip-buying army\" reappeared.\nVanda's data is tracked globally but U.S.-based traders likely comprise the biggest chunk of it.\nTheir buying may help to stabilise U.S.-listed Chinese shares after several days of selling driven by Beijing's move to tighten regulations on the technology and education sectors.\nThe Nasdaq Golden Dragon China benchmark of tech stocks rebounded 8% on Wednesday after four days of falls.\nVanda said U.S.-listed shares of three Chinese companies -- electric vehicle makers Nio and Xpeng , and tech giant Alibaba -- were among the six biggest bought stocks by U.S. retail investors on Tuesday, attracting net inflows worth a combined $194 million.\nThose shares have fallen between 12% and 17% at their lowest point this week compared with Friday's close.\nOverall, stocks impacted by the regulatory crackdown had seen combined retail inflows of $239 million, roughly 14% of total retail purchases on the day, Vanda said.\nThe data could signal that while professional investors had turned wary about China, retail traders had sensed an opportunity.\nRetail traders have shot to prominence this year after big bets on heavily shorted stocks such as video game retailer GameStop or cinema chain AMC , driving huge rallies in relatively obscure shares and heaped losses on several big-name hedge funds.\nBut the buying of newly cheap Chinese shares implies a shift in the retail traders' behaviour, Vanda analysts Ben Onatibia and Giacomo Pierantoni noted.\n\"From driving triple-digit returns in high multiple stocks, they have turned into dip buyers in underperforming ones,\" they told clients.\n\"Financials, energy and reopening are a few of the sectors where they've cushioned institutional selling.\"\nHouseholds are the biggest investors in the United States and own 37% of the equity market, according to data published by Barclays. Research has also shown that U.S. stimulus checks to households have found their way into the equity market.\nReddit, popular with day traders for stock tips, contained discussions on the Chinese share slump, with comments from a few interested buyers.\nBut mainstream investors are likely to remain cautious in the face of greater regulatory uncertainty.\n\"The de-rating of tech stocks is here to stay for some time. I don't expect multiples to go up anytime soon,\" said Gael Combes, head of fundamental research equities at Unigestion.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":72,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":881864638,"gmtCreate":1631324635524,"gmtModify":1676530528521,"author":{"id":"3576444918223783","authorId":"3576444918223783","name":"Damien Khoo","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/f08d9f6bdc3c0038e9aa81591b4df363","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576444918223783","authorIdStr":"3576444918223783"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Beaten down and hopefully can get up soon…","listText":"Beaten down and hopefully can get up soon…","text":"Beaten down and hopefully can get up soon…","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":4,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/881864638","repostId":"2166375838","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":55,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":802544066,"gmtCreate":1627791203255,"gmtModify":1703495943091,"author":{"id":"3576444918223783","authorId":"3576444918223783","name":"Damien Khoo","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/f08d9f6bdc3c0038e9aa81591b4df363","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576444918223783","authorIdStr":"3576444918223783"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"How about the Chinese stocks that were already&nbsp;hammered? They were&nbsp;hammered in July. Does this mean they will continue to get hammered more in August?&nbsp;","listText":"How about the Chinese stocks that were already&nbsp;hammered? They were&nbsp;hammered in July. Does this mean they will continue to get hammered more in August?&nbsp;","text":"How about the Chinese stocks that were already hammered? They were hammered in July. Does this mean they will continue to get hammered more in August?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/802544066","repostId":"1142925544","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1142925544","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1627787240,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1142925544?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-08-01 11:07","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Investors, Beware! Stocks Are Entering the Most Dangerous Stretch of the Year","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1142925544","media":"Barron's","summary":"“Yes, it’s summer, my time of year,”as the group War sangin that golden oldie “Summer” from the 1970","content":"<p>“Yes, it’s summer, my time of year,”as the group War sangin that golden oldie “Summer” from the 1970s, recalling pleasant times at the beach or by the barbecue. No need to remind anyone back then of droughts, wildfires, or Covid-19 surges that are unfortunate features of the steamy season this year.</p>\n<p>But the coming of August also means entering what historically has been the most treacherous stretch of the year for stocks, according to data going back to 1928 compiled by Bank of America analyst Stephen Suttmeier. He finds that theS&amp;P 500index had a negative return averaging 0.03% in August, September, and October—the worst three-month span of the year for the big-cap benchmark. In fact, they constitute the only three-month period that averages in the red.</p>\n<p>August actually is bracketed by the best and worst months of the year, he adds in a research note. July averages a 1.58% return on the S&amp;P 500, with positive results 59.1% of the time, while September averages a negative 1.03%, ending in the plus column less than half of the time, or 45%.</p>\n<p>This July did even better than the norm, with the S&amp;P 500 gaining 2.27%. It also was the sixth consecutive up month for the index—the longest positive streak since September 2018, according to Dow Jones’ statistical mavens. During that period, its cumulative advance was 18.34%.</p>\n<p>August’s record is in between, with an average 0.70% S&amp;P 500 return and positive results 58.1% of the time, marking a transition from the “summer rip” to the “fall dip.”</p>\n<p>Not surprisingly, the laggard returns of the August-October period are accompanied by an uptick in volatility, Suttmeier finds. Based on records going back to 1992, theCboe Volatility Index,or VIX, has often seen spikes during those months, following relatively subdued volatility in the April-July period.</p>\n<p>Past isn’t necessarily prologue, but if it is, the timing of the initial public offering byRobinhood Markets(ticker: HOOD) might prove propitious, if the stock market does have its typical seasonal rough patch. The online broker, whose putative mission is to open investing to novices supposedly ignored by established outfits, sold 55 million shares at $38 on Thursday. In the process, it provided a valuable lesson to all those who got in on the IPO: Buy low and sell high.</p>\n<p>The company evidently fulfilled the latter imperative, selling its shares high, even though they were priced at the low end of the expected $38-$42 range. Their price sank 8.4% on their first day of trading, although they recouped a bit on Friday. By week’s end, buyers of Robinhood’s IPO who held were down 7.5%.</p>\n<p>Among those who sold high were the company’s co-founders, CEO Vladimir Tenev and Chief Creative Officer Baiju Bhatt, who each offloaded 1.25 million shares in the IPO. As my illustrious predecessor, Alan Abelson, liked to observe, there are many good reasons to sell a stock, but expecting it to go up isn’t one of them. That has never been more true, given the ability of rich owners to monetize their assets by borrowing against them cheaply, and without incurring capital-gains taxes.</p>\n<p>To be sure, Tenev and Bhatt still have significant stakes in Robinhood. Asour colleague Avi Salzman reported, these were worth $2.5 billion at the initial offering price, and Tenev and Bhatt retain voting control. The two also could receive awards of shares worth as much as $6.7 billion for Tenev and $4 billion for Bhatt, if the stock hits $300, or nearly the proverbial ten-bagger from here.</p>\n<p>But in a blow against income inequality, the potential billionaire pair took symbolic pay cuts, to $34,248, the average annual wage of American workers. As the comedian Yakov Smirnoff likes to say, “What a country!”</p>\n<p>How those workers are faring will be a subject of the monthly employment report slated for release this coming Friday.</p>\n<p>Economists’ forecasts for nonfarm payrolls center around a gain of 900,000. Jefferies economists Aneta Markowska and Thomas Simons estimate that the increase could top the long-anticipated one million mark; they forecast 1.2 million.</p>\n<p>Markowska and Simons think the expiration of supplemental unemployment benefits in some states will boost the labor supply, although that is a matter of significant debate. (For more on the jobs market, seethis week’s cover story.)</p>\n<p></p>","source":"lsy1610680873436","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Investors, Beware! Stocks Are Entering the Most Dangerous Stretch of the Year</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nInvestors, Beware! Stocks Are Entering the Most Dangerous Stretch of the Year\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-08-01 11:07 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.barrons.com/articles/stocks-news-robinhood-sp500-51627692215?mod=hp_LATEST><strong>Barron's</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>“Yes, it’s summer, my time of year,”as the group War sangin that golden oldie “Summer” from the 1970s, recalling pleasant times at the beach or by the barbecue. No need to remind anyone back then of ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/stocks-news-robinhood-sp500-51627692215?mod=hp_LATEST\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SPY":"标普500ETF",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/stocks-news-robinhood-sp500-51627692215?mod=hp_LATEST","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1142925544","content_text":"“Yes, it’s summer, my time of year,”as the group War sangin that golden oldie “Summer” from the 1970s, recalling pleasant times at the beach or by the barbecue. No need to remind anyone back then of droughts, wildfires, or Covid-19 surges that are unfortunate features of the steamy season this year.\nBut the coming of August also means entering what historically has been the most treacherous stretch of the year for stocks, according to data going back to 1928 compiled by Bank of America analyst Stephen Suttmeier. He finds that theS&P 500index had a negative return averaging 0.03% in August, September, and October—the worst three-month span of the year for the big-cap benchmark. In fact, they constitute the only three-month period that averages in the red.\nAugust actually is bracketed by the best and worst months of the year, he adds in a research note. July averages a 1.58% return on the S&P 500, with positive results 59.1% of the time, while September averages a negative 1.03%, ending in the plus column less than half of the time, or 45%.\nThis July did even better than the norm, with the S&P 500 gaining 2.27%. It also was the sixth consecutive up month for the index—the longest positive streak since September 2018, according to Dow Jones’ statistical mavens. During that period, its cumulative advance was 18.34%.\nAugust’s record is in between, with an average 0.70% S&P 500 return and positive results 58.1% of the time, marking a transition from the “summer rip” to the “fall dip.”\nNot surprisingly, the laggard returns of the August-October period are accompanied by an uptick in volatility, Suttmeier finds. Based on records going back to 1992, theCboe Volatility Index,or VIX, has often seen spikes during those months, following relatively subdued volatility in the April-July period.\nPast isn’t necessarily prologue, but if it is, the timing of the initial public offering byRobinhood Markets(ticker: HOOD) might prove propitious, if the stock market does have its typical seasonal rough patch. The online broker, whose putative mission is to open investing to novices supposedly ignored by established outfits, sold 55 million shares at $38 on Thursday. In the process, it provided a valuable lesson to all those who got in on the IPO: Buy low and sell high.\nThe company evidently fulfilled the latter imperative, selling its shares high, even though they were priced at the low end of the expected $38-$42 range. Their price sank 8.4% on their first day of trading, although they recouped a bit on Friday. By week’s end, buyers of Robinhood’s IPO who held were down 7.5%.\nAmong those who sold high were the company’s co-founders, CEO Vladimir Tenev and Chief Creative Officer Baiju Bhatt, who each offloaded 1.25 million shares in the IPO. As my illustrious predecessor, Alan Abelson, liked to observe, there are many good reasons to sell a stock, but expecting it to go up isn’t one of them. That has never been more true, given the ability of rich owners to monetize their assets by borrowing against them cheaply, and without incurring capital-gains taxes.\nTo be sure, Tenev and Bhatt still have significant stakes in Robinhood. Asour colleague Avi Salzman reported, these were worth $2.5 billion at the initial offering price, and Tenev and Bhatt retain voting control. The two also could receive awards of shares worth as much as $6.7 billion for Tenev and $4 billion for Bhatt, if the stock hits $300, or nearly the proverbial ten-bagger from here.\nBut in a blow against income inequality, the potential billionaire pair took symbolic pay cuts, to $34,248, the average annual wage of American workers. As the comedian Yakov Smirnoff likes to say, “What a country!”\nHow those workers are faring will be a subject of the monthly employment report slated for release this coming Friday.\nEconomists’ forecasts for nonfarm payrolls center around a gain of 900,000. Jefferies economists Aneta Markowska and Thomas Simons estimate that the increase could top the long-anticipated one million mark; they forecast 1.2 million.\nMarkowska and Simons think the expiration of supplemental unemployment benefits in some states will boost the labor supply, although that is a matter of significant debate. (For more on the jobs market, seethis week’s cover story.)","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":37,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[{"author":{"id":"3579082097230100","authorId":"3579082097230100","name":"Gaga71","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/02afa88b95dc30f4a60767c18f9e2f39","crmLevel":7,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3579082097230100","authorIdStr":"3579082097230100"},"content":"This hammer is stronger the thor’s hammer.","text":"This hammer is stronger the thor’s hammer.","html":"This hammer is stronger the thor’s hammer."}],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":177587621,"gmtCreate":1627252772263,"gmtModify":1703485881254,"author":{"id":"3576444918223783","authorId":"3576444918223783","name":"Damien Khoo","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/f08d9f6bdc3c0038e9aa81591b4df363","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576444918223783","authorIdStr":"3576444918223783"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Honestly,&nbsp;I doubt so.&nbsp;","listText":"Honestly,&nbsp;I doubt so.&nbsp;","text":"Honestly, I doubt so.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":9,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/177587621","repostId":"2153936352","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2153936352","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1627180340,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2153936352?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-25 10:32","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Will Square Be Worth More Than PayPal by 2025?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2153936352","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Could the ambitious fintech company overtake the market leader?","content":"<p><b>Square</b> (NYSE:SQ) and <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PYPL\">PayPal</a></b> (NASDAQ:PYPL) have both generated massive returns for patient investors over the past few years. Square went public at $9 per share in late 2015, and it's now trading at around $260. PayPal, which was spun off from<b> <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/EBAY\">eBay</a> </b>(NASDAQ:EBAY) earlier that year, has advanced more than 720% since its debut to over $300 per share.</p>\n<p>Square is worth nearly $120 billion as of this writing, while PayPal is worth over $350 billion. That isn't surprising, since PayPal still serves a much larger audience and operates in more countries than Square. But gazing into the future, could Square eventually match -- or even surpass -- PayPal's valuation by 2025? Let's examine both fintech companies' growth trajectories and valuations to find out.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a3384d45efb17ed54b398c7dbcc043fb\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Image source: Getty Images.</span></p>\n<h2><b>Wild ambitions vs. stable growth</b></h2>\n<p>Square and PayPal's core business models are similar. Both companies charge businesses flat fees, which vary by platform and transaction type, to process payments. Both companies offer small business loans. Square's Cash App and PayPal's Venmo both enable consumers to make peer-to-peer payments, and both companies provide branded debit cards that are linked to users' online accounts.</p>\n<p>But Square has been willing to take bolder risks than PayPal over the past few years. It expanded its services ecosystem with online payroll management services and analytics tools, and recently launched a full suite of online banking services. Square also added <b>Bitcoin</b> (CRYPTO:BTC) purchases to its Cash App in 2018, added free stock trades to the app to challenge Robinhood in 2019, and plans to add Credit Karma's tax filing services to its ecosystem in the near future.</p>\n<p>PayPal only started offering cryptocurrency trades last October, and it doesn't have any near-term plans to launch stock trading tools or dedicated tax filing services, or expand into a full-blown online bank like Square. Simply put, Square seems to have wilder and grander ambitions than PayPal.</p>\n<h2>Which company is growing faster?</h2>\n<p>Between 2015 and 2020, Square grew its annual revenue at a CAGR of 49.6%. Excluding its massive gain in Bitcoin revenue last year, it would still have grown its revenue at a CAGR of 31.2% over the past five years. PayPal's annual revenue grew at a CAGR of 18.5% between 2015 and 2020. Let's take a look at Wall Street's expectations for both companies over the next two years.</p>\n<table border=\"1\" width=\"600\">\n <colgroup></colgroup>\n <tbody>\n  <tr valign=\"TOP\">\n   <th width=\"118\"><p>Company</p></th>\n   <th width=\"213\"><p>Estimated Sales Growth (FY 2021)</p></th>\n   <th width=\"225\"><p>Estimated Sales Growth(FY 2022)</p></th>\n  </tr>\n  <tr valign=\"TOP\">\n   <td width=\"118\"><p><b>Square</b></p></td>\n   <td width=\"213\"><p>110.6%</p></td>\n   <td width=\"225\"><p>14.1%</p></td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr valign=\"TOP\">\n   <td width=\"118\"><p><b>PayPal</b></p></td>\n   <td width=\"213\"><p>20.6%</p></td>\n   <td width=\"225\"><p>21.5%</p></td>\n  </tr>\n </tbody>\n</table>\n<p>Source: Yahoo Finance, July 22.</p>\n<p>Analysts expect Square's Bitcoin revenue to continue rising this year before cooling off next year. They also expect its growth in transaction-based and seller service revenue, which slowed down during the pandemic, to recover as more businesses reopen. The Cash App, which grew its monthly active users 50% to 36 million in 2020, should also keep expanding as Square adds new services.</p>\n<p>Cathie Wood's ARK Invest expects Square's transaction-based and seller service revenues to grow at a CAGR of 19% through 2025. It also expects the Cash App's MAUs to more than double to 75 million, for Square to monetize roughly 40% of those users, and for its average revenue per Cash App user to grow from $25 in 2019 to $260 in 2025 -- which would represent a whopping CAGR of 49%.</p>\n<p>PayPal's growth should remain more predictable, since it doesn't generate significant revenue from cryptocurrencies yet. Instead, it will mainly rely on its growth in active accounts, which rose 21% year-over-year to 392 million last quarter, to generate stable revenue from its processing fees.</p>\n<p>PayPal expects to nearly double its active accounts to 750 million and <i>more than double</i> its annual revenue to over $50 billion by 2025. It also plans to grow its earnings at a CAGR of 22% from 2020 to 2025. It believes the rising acceptance of QR codes and NFC payments, the expansion of its financial services, and higher engagement rates for its apps will all drive that long-term growth.</p>\n<h2>Will Square be worth more than PayPal by 2025?</h2>\n<p>In a best-case scenario, ARK Invest believes Square's stock could hit $500 per share by 2025 if it hits its growth targets. But unlike PayPal, Square hasn't provided any concrete targets of its own yet.</p>\n<p>If Square hits $500 and its valuations hold steady, it could be worth just over $200 billion by 2025. Meanwhile, if PayPal achieves its goals of more than doubling its annual revenue and growing its EPS at a CAGR of 22% through 2025, its stock could easily double and boost its market cap to $700 billion.</p>\n<p>Therefore, it's doubtful that Square -- which already trades at higher valuations than PayPal -- will be the more valuable company by 2025. But that doesn't mean PayPal is necessarily a better growth stock than Square. I personally own Square instead of PayPal, because I admire its ambitious and forward-thinking strategies. Both stocks are still great long-term investments on the booming fintech market, so investors shouldn't fret too much over which company has the higher market cap.</p>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Will Square Be Worth More Than PayPal by 2025?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWill Square Be Worth More Than PayPal by 2025?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-25 10:32 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/24/will-square-be-worth-more-than-paypal-by-2025/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Square (NYSE:SQ) and PayPal (NASDAQ:PYPL) have both generated massive returns for patient investors over the past few years. Square went public at $9 per share in late 2015, and it's now trading at ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/24/will-square-be-worth-more-than-paypal-by-2025/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"PYPL":"PayPal","SQ":"Block"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/07/24/will-square-be-worth-more-than-paypal-by-2025/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2153936352","content_text":"Square (NYSE:SQ) and PayPal (NASDAQ:PYPL) have both generated massive returns for patient investors over the past few years. Square went public at $9 per share in late 2015, and it's now trading at around $260. PayPal, which was spun off from eBay (NASDAQ:EBAY) earlier that year, has advanced more than 720% since its debut to over $300 per share.\nSquare is worth nearly $120 billion as of this writing, while PayPal is worth over $350 billion. That isn't surprising, since PayPal still serves a much larger audience and operates in more countries than Square. But gazing into the future, could Square eventually match -- or even surpass -- PayPal's valuation by 2025? Let's examine both fintech companies' growth trajectories and valuations to find out.\nImage source: Getty Images.\nWild ambitions vs. stable growth\nSquare and PayPal's core business models are similar. Both companies charge businesses flat fees, which vary by platform and transaction type, to process payments. Both companies offer small business loans. Square's Cash App and PayPal's Venmo both enable consumers to make peer-to-peer payments, and both companies provide branded debit cards that are linked to users' online accounts.\nBut Square has been willing to take bolder risks than PayPal over the past few years. It expanded its services ecosystem with online payroll management services and analytics tools, and recently launched a full suite of online banking services. Square also added Bitcoin (CRYPTO:BTC) purchases to its Cash App in 2018, added free stock trades to the app to challenge Robinhood in 2019, and plans to add Credit Karma's tax filing services to its ecosystem in the near future.\nPayPal only started offering cryptocurrency trades last October, and it doesn't have any near-term plans to launch stock trading tools or dedicated tax filing services, or expand into a full-blown online bank like Square. Simply put, Square seems to have wilder and grander ambitions than PayPal.\nWhich company is growing faster?\nBetween 2015 and 2020, Square grew its annual revenue at a CAGR of 49.6%. Excluding its massive gain in Bitcoin revenue last year, it would still have grown its revenue at a CAGR of 31.2% over the past five years. PayPal's annual revenue grew at a CAGR of 18.5% between 2015 and 2020. Let's take a look at Wall Street's expectations for both companies over the next two years.\n\n\n\n\nCompany\nEstimated Sales Growth (FY 2021)\nEstimated Sales Growth(FY 2022)\n\n\nSquare\n110.6%\n14.1%\n\n\nPayPal\n20.6%\n21.5%\n\n\n\nSource: Yahoo Finance, July 22.\nAnalysts expect Square's Bitcoin revenue to continue rising this year before cooling off next year. They also expect its growth in transaction-based and seller service revenue, which slowed down during the pandemic, to recover as more businesses reopen. The Cash App, which grew its monthly active users 50% to 36 million in 2020, should also keep expanding as Square adds new services.\nCathie Wood's ARK Invest expects Square's transaction-based and seller service revenues to grow at a CAGR of 19% through 2025. It also expects the Cash App's MAUs to more than double to 75 million, for Square to monetize roughly 40% of those users, and for its average revenue per Cash App user to grow from $25 in 2019 to $260 in 2025 -- which would represent a whopping CAGR of 49%.\nPayPal's growth should remain more predictable, since it doesn't generate significant revenue from cryptocurrencies yet. Instead, it will mainly rely on its growth in active accounts, which rose 21% year-over-year to 392 million last quarter, to generate stable revenue from its processing fees.\nPayPal expects to nearly double its active accounts to 750 million and more than double its annual revenue to over $50 billion by 2025. It also plans to grow its earnings at a CAGR of 22% from 2020 to 2025. It believes the rising acceptance of QR codes and NFC payments, the expansion of its financial services, and higher engagement rates for its apps will all drive that long-term growth.\nWill Square be worth more than PayPal by 2025?\nIn a best-case scenario, ARK Invest believes Square's stock could hit $500 per share by 2025 if it hits its growth targets. But unlike PayPal, Square hasn't provided any concrete targets of its own yet.\nIf Square hits $500 and its valuations hold steady, it could be worth just over $200 billion by 2025. Meanwhile, if PayPal achieves its goals of more than doubling its annual revenue and growing its EPS at a CAGR of 22% through 2025, its stock could easily double and boost its market cap to $700 billion.\nTherefore, it's doubtful that Square -- which already trades at higher valuations than PayPal -- will be the more valuable company by 2025. But that doesn't mean PayPal is necessarily a better growth stock than Square. I personally own Square instead of PayPal, because I admire its ambitious and forward-thinking strategies. Both stocks are still great long-term investments on the booming fintech market, so investors shouldn't fret too much over which company has the higher market cap.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":130,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9923889371,"gmtCreate":1670823336793,"gmtModify":1676538441026,"author":{"id":"3576444918223783","authorId":"3576444918223783","name":"Damien Khoo","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/f08d9f6bdc3c0038e9aa81591b4df363","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576444918223783","authorIdStr":"3576444918223783"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Market is getting ready&nbsp;to react to&nbsp;the outcrof&nbsp;FOMC meeting.&nbsp;","listText":"Market is getting ready&nbsp;to react to&nbsp;the outcrof&nbsp;FOMC meeting.&nbsp;","text":"Market is getting ready to react to the outcrof FOMC meeting.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9923889371","repostId":"2290724492","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2290724492","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1670798437,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2290724492?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-12-12 06:40","market":"us","language":"en","title":"The Fed May Hand The Market A Huge Surprise This Week","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2290724492","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"SummaryThe Fed needs to deliver a hawkish message for 2023 at the December FOMC meeting.It seems hig","content":"<html><head></head><body><h2>Summary</h2><ul><li>The Fed needs to deliver a hawkish message for 2023 at the December FOMC meeting.</li><li>It seems highly probable the Fed will signal a 5% or higher terminal rate for 2023.</li><li>If the Fed fails, it risks losing control of the market.</li></ul><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/82d8be80a0077f14b056bfdd4db0eb8a\" tg-width=\"750\" tg-height=\"500\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>Win McNamee</span></p><p>The FOMC meeting on Wednesday, December 14, will be a meaningful event as it will end the expeditious process of raising rates to catch up with inflation and shift to the next phase, focusing on how high and for how long.</p><p>Listening to Fed officials since the November FOMC meeting, it is clear that the Fed&#39;s projected path of rate hikes will be higher than where they stood at the September FOMC meeting. At that point, the Fed saw the peak terminal rate at 4.6%. Rates are likely heading much higher than what the market has priced in for 2023.</p><p>The problem is that the market doesn&#39;t believe the Fed and currently sees rates at just 4.6% by December 2023.</p><h2>Much Higher, For Much Longer</h2><p>A 50 bps rate hike at the December meeting has been well-telegraphed, and Powell confirmed as much at his Q&amp;A session at the Brookings Institutions on November 30. At least 6 Fed governors have openly noted that they see rates peaking above 5%, and while Powell may not have indicated where he sees the terminal rate, he has stated he sees it higher than the September projection. Additionally, Fed board members like Christopher Waller have suggested that rates have a long way to go and is among the Fed&#39;s most hawkish members. Also, Loretta Mester saw the market pricing of a peak rate of around 5% as not being far off.</p><p>Jim Bullard of the St. Louis Fed thinks rates need to rise to between 5 and 7% to be restrictive enough to kill inflation. Meanwhile, Mary Daly of the San Francisco Fed sees rates at 5% as a good starting point. Raphael Bostic of the Atlanta Fed sees rates between 4.75% and 5%. Thomas Barkin of the Richmond Fed notes that rates may need to rise above 5%, while Neel Kashkari sees rates above his 4.9% September projection.</p><p>So if there were only 6 FOMC members who saw rates above 5% at the September FOMC, there are likely to be at least nine now, and probably several more at the December FOMC meeting that will signal that rates need to be in that 5 to 5.25% region for the peak terminal rate.</p><p>If more evidence is needed, this article from the Wall Street Journal followed the jobs report &#34;suggesting&#34; the Fed would raise rates above 5% in 2023. Then another piece came out on December 5, which again &#34;suggested&#34; rates going above 5% in 2023. The WSJ has often telegraphed Fed monetary policy in 2022, such as back in June ahead of the Fed&#39;s first 75 bps rate hike.</p><p>Given the messaging that rates are likely to be at least 5% and probably higher, it is highly probable the Fed will illustrate its projections through the December dot plot noting a terminal rate for 2023 at 5.1% or 50 bps higher rate than the September projection for 2023.</p><h2>The Market Doesn&#39;t Believe The Fed</h2><p>Of course, this would come at odds with the market, which currently sees the peak terminal rate around 4.9%, and then the Fed cutting rates to 4.58% by December 2023, which is <i>lower than</i>the Fed&#39;s September projections of 4.6%. The market does not believe the Fed will hold rates above 5% for all of 2023, despite Fed officials consistently delivering that message for months.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d4a665b5ca0f1dc3cdb171765f8123ac\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"312\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>Mott Capital</span></p><p>It is perhaps the reasoning behind Powell&#39;s apparent change in positioning at the Brookings Institution, where he seemed to give the market a pass regarding the recent easing of financial conditions. Instead, he focused on telegraphing the pace of rate hikes slowing from 75 to 50 bps. He knew he could also push back against the easing of financial conditions two weeks later at the December FOMC through the projections indicating a higher for longer timing, which the market has been unwilling to accept.</p><h2>Financial Conditions Need To Tighten</h2><p>By any measure, financial conditions have eased a lot since mid-October. The easing financial conditions do not help the Fed&#39;s overall cause of keeping policy restrictive enough to bring down inflation.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/47e20e14c2bfd67a0ee98e94ebb5ceec\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"369\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>Bloomberg</span></p><p>If the Fed can deliver this message of a 5% or higher terminal rate through the end of 2023, we will find that the 2-year rate is too low, which will need to rise. Since the summer, the 2-year rate has been trading at a discount to the December Fed Funds Futures by 10 to 25 bps. So if the Fed can convince the market it sees the Fed Funds rate at 5 to 5.25% by the end of 2023, then it seems probable that the 2-year rate can trade to as high as 4.8% to 5%.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ab6bbea9babf2b8cc871b24fb6b423b2\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"370\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>Bloomberg</span></p><p>It would likely result in the yield curve steepening further and the spread between the 2-year and the 10-year becoming more deeply inverted, as the market prices in a higher recession risk, and rates just staying higher for a longer period.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/51598801716677c82df044dc4df5b629\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"274\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>Bloomberg</span></p><p>It would probably help to reverse a lot of the weakening in the dollar index and potentially push the index higher and back towards 110 over time.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3cbb1e7d55a783c8cbbac5deb72b840e\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"274\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>Bloomberg</span></p><p>It should also raise the VIX index as traders look to add protection again due to the increased risk of the Fed over-tightening. The VIX has already started moving higher since the Fed minutes were released just a couple of weeks ago, which also messaged a higher-for-longer approach to monetary policy in 2023.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/937f171fa291fe09bb5af70849139149\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"274\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>Bloomberg</span></p><p>A strong dollar, higher rates, and higher implied volatility should tighten financial conditions. That will be a massive headwind for equity prices, resulting in stocks giving back nearly all of the gains witnessed since the October lows and potentially filling the technical gaps at 3,745 and 3,580.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/49db7e3529087186cb6b9611353a2bf9\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"284\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>Bloomberg</span></p><p>Is it likely to materialize at the time of the release of the FOMC statement or the press conference? That is impossible to say because that will depend on where implied volatility levels are and whether or not implied volatility is high enough to create a short-squeeze once IV comes crashing down following the news. As of December 9, IV was relatively high, at almost 31% for December 14 options expiration, and is only likely to rise further heading to the meeting next week.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/190ead5d4738acc2bc98a96cab961e25\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"368\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>Bloomberg</span></p><h2>Could Lose Control</h2><p>If the Fed fails to gain control of the narrative and prove to the market it plans to get rates to 5% and hold them there in 2023, it risks losing control of the market, resulting in financial conditions easing further as rates drop, the dollar weakens, implied volatility falls, and stocks rip higher.</p><p>Further easing of financial conditions would likely result in mortgage rates falling, lifting the housing market. Meanwhile, a weaker dollar would increase commodity prices and raise import prices, undoing much of the Fed&#39;s accomplishments in 2022.</p><p>That is why the Fed must stand firm through the dot plot and the press conference if it is serious about bringing inflation down and cooling the labor.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>The Fed May Hand The Market A Huge Surprise This Week</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nThe Fed May Hand The Market A Huge Surprise This Week\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-12-12 06:40 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4563729-fed-may-hand-market-huge-surprise-this-week><strong>Seeking Alpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>SummaryThe Fed needs to deliver a hawkish message for 2023 at the December FOMC meeting.It seems highly probable the Fed will signal a 5% or higher terminal rate for 2023.If the Fed fails, it risks ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4563729-fed-may-hand-market-huge-surprise-this-week\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4563729-fed-may-hand-market-huge-surprise-this-week","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2290724492","content_text":"SummaryThe Fed needs to deliver a hawkish message for 2023 at the December FOMC meeting.It seems highly probable the Fed will signal a 5% or higher terminal rate for 2023.If the Fed fails, it risks losing control of the market.Win McNameeThe FOMC meeting on Wednesday, December 14, will be a meaningful event as it will end the expeditious process of raising rates to catch up with inflation and shift to the next phase, focusing on how high and for how long.Listening to Fed officials since the November FOMC meeting, it is clear that the Fed's projected path of rate hikes will be higher than where they stood at the September FOMC meeting. At that point, the Fed saw the peak terminal rate at 4.6%. Rates are likely heading much higher than what the market has priced in for 2023.The problem is that the market doesn't believe the Fed and currently sees rates at just 4.6% by December 2023.Much Higher, For Much LongerA 50 bps rate hike at the December meeting has been well-telegraphed, and Powell confirmed as much at his Q&A session at the Brookings Institutions on November 30. At least 6 Fed governors have openly noted that they see rates peaking above 5%, and while Powell may not have indicated where he sees the terminal rate, he has stated he sees it higher than the September projection. Additionally, Fed board members like Christopher Waller have suggested that rates have a long way to go and is among the Fed's most hawkish members. Also, Loretta Mester saw the market pricing of a peak rate of around 5% as not being far off.Jim Bullard of the St. Louis Fed thinks rates need to rise to between 5 and 7% to be restrictive enough to kill inflation. Meanwhile, Mary Daly of the San Francisco Fed sees rates at 5% as a good starting point. Raphael Bostic of the Atlanta Fed sees rates between 4.75% and 5%. Thomas Barkin of the Richmond Fed notes that rates may need to rise above 5%, while Neel Kashkari sees rates above his 4.9% September projection.So if there were only 6 FOMC members who saw rates above 5% at the September FOMC, there are likely to be at least nine now, and probably several more at the December FOMC meeting that will signal that rates need to be in that 5 to 5.25% region for the peak terminal rate.If more evidence is needed, this article from the Wall Street Journal followed the jobs report \"suggesting\" the Fed would raise rates above 5% in 2023. Then another piece came out on December 5, which again \"suggested\" rates going above 5% in 2023. The WSJ has often telegraphed Fed monetary policy in 2022, such as back in June ahead of the Fed's first 75 bps rate hike.Given the messaging that rates are likely to be at least 5% and probably higher, it is highly probable the Fed will illustrate its projections through the December dot plot noting a terminal rate for 2023 at 5.1% or 50 bps higher rate than the September projection for 2023.The Market Doesn't Believe The FedOf course, this would come at odds with the market, which currently sees the peak terminal rate around 4.9%, and then the Fed cutting rates to 4.58% by December 2023, which is lower thanthe Fed's September projections of 4.6%. The market does not believe the Fed will hold rates above 5% for all of 2023, despite Fed officials consistently delivering that message for months.Mott CapitalIt is perhaps the reasoning behind Powell's apparent change in positioning at the Brookings Institution, where he seemed to give the market a pass regarding the recent easing of financial conditions. Instead, he focused on telegraphing the pace of rate hikes slowing from 75 to 50 bps. He knew he could also push back against the easing of financial conditions two weeks later at the December FOMC through the projections indicating a higher for longer timing, which the market has been unwilling to accept.Financial Conditions Need To TightenBy any measure, financial conditions have eased a lot since mid-October. The easing financial conditions do not help the Fed's overall cause of keeping policy restrictive enough to bring down inflation.BloombergIf the Fed can deliver this message of a 5% or higher terminal rate through the end of 2023, we will find that the 2-year rate is too low, which will need to rise. Since the summer, the 2-year rate has been trading at a discount to the December Fed Funds Futures by 10 to 25 bps. So if the Fed can convince the market it sees the Fed Funds rate at 5 to 5.25% by the end of 2023, then it seems probable that the 2-year rate can trade to as high as 4.8% to 5%.BloombergIt would likely result in the yield curve steepening further and the spread between the 2-year and the 10-year becoming more deeply inverted, as the market prices in a higher recession risk, and rates just staying higher for a longer period.BloombergIt would probably help to reverse a lot of the weakening in the dollar index and potentially push the index higher and back towards 110 over time.BloombergIt should also raise the VIX index as traders look to add protection again due to the increased risk of the Fed over-tightening. The VIX has already started moving higher since the Fed minutes were released just a couple of weeks ago, which also messaged a higher-for-longer approach to monetary policy in 2023.BloombergA strong dollar, higher rates, and higher implied volatility should tighten financial conditions. That will be a massive headwind for equity prices, resulting in stocks giving back nearly all of the gains witnessed since the October lows and potentially filling the technical gaps at 3,745 and 3,580.BloombergIs it likely to materialize at the time of the release of the FOMC statement or the press conference? That is impossible to say because that will depend on where implied volatility levels are and whether or not implied volatility is high enough to create a short-squeeze once IV comes crashing down following the news. As of December 9, IV was relatively high, at almost 31% for December 14 options expiration, and is only likely to rise further heading to the meeting next week.BloombergCould Lose ControlIf the Fed fails to gain control of the narrative and prove to the market it plans to get rates to 5% and hold them there in 2023, it risks losing control of the market, resulting in financial conditions easing further as rates drop, the dollar weakens, implied volatility falls, and stocks rip higher.Further easing of financial conditions would likely result in mortgage rates falling, lifting the housing market. Meanwhile, a weaker dollar would increase commodity prices and raise import prices, undoing much of the Fed's accomplishments in 2022.That is why the Fed must stand firm through the dot plot and the press conference if it is serious about bringing inflation down and cooling the labor.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":694,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9085164634,"gmtCreate":1650672200701,"gmtModify":1676534773264,"author":{"id":"3576444918223783","authorId":"3576444918223783","name":"Damien Khoo","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/f08d9f6bdc3c0038e9aa81591b4df363","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576444918223783","authorIdStr":"3576444918223783"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"I think the market will sideways until there isa catalyst.&nbsp;","listText":"I think the market will sideways until there isa catalyst.&nbsp;","text":"I think the market will sideways until there isa catalyst.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9085164634","repostId":"2229641491","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2229641491","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1650668840,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2229641491?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-04-23 07:07","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Wall St Slumps as Weak Earnings, Rate Hike Clarity Spook Investors","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2229641491","media":"Reuters","summary":"* Healthcare stocks slump on HCA, Intuitive Surgical numbers* Big tech down ahead of earnings next w","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>* Healthcare stocks slump on HCA, Intuitive Surgical numbers</p><p>* Big tech down ahead of earnings next week</p><p>* Dow posts biggest one-day fall since Oct. 2020</p><p>* Weekly falls: Dow 1.9%, S&amp;P 2.8%, Nasdaq 3.8%</p><p>* Indexes down on Friday: Dow 2.82%, S&amp;P 2.77%, Nasdaq 2.55% </p><p>April 22 (Reuters) - Wall Street tumbled more than 2.5% on Friday, ensuring the three main benchmarks ended in negative territory for the week, as surprise earnings news and increased certainty around aggressive near-term interest rate rises took its toll on investors.</p><p>It was the third straight week of losses for both the S&amp;P 500 and the Nasdaq, while the Dow Jones posted its fourth weekly decline in a row.</p><p>For the Dow, its 2.82% drop on Friday was its biggest one-day fall since October 2020.</p><p>Exaggerated trading swings have become more common recently, as traders adjust to new data points from earnings, as well as when rates will rise again. For the Nasdaq, Friday was the eighth session in April, out of 15 trading days this month, where the index either rose or fell by more than 2%.</p><p>&#34;It&#39;s not very common, over the course of my time doing this job, for the market to move 2% in either direction and to think &#39;there&#39;s not too much to read into that&#39;,&#34; said Craig Erlam, senior market analyst at OANDA.</p><p>&#34;That&#39;s not normal, but that&#39;s just how things have been for such a long time now.&#34;</p><p>Concerns about risks from interest rate hikes continued to reverberate after Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell&#39;s hawkish pivot on Thursday, where he backed moving more quickly to combat inflation and said a 50-basis-point increase would be &#34;on the table&#34; when the Fed meets in May.</p><p>The idea of &#34;front-end loading&#34; the U.S. central bank&#39;s retreat from super-easy monetary policy, which Powell articulated support for on Thursday, has also forced traders to re-evaluate how aggressive subsequent rate rises would be.</p><p>The CBOE Volatility index, also known as Wall Street&#39;s fear gauge, jumped on Friday, ending at its highest level since mid-March.</p><p>Meanwhile, the latest earnings forecasts to jolt investors came from healthcare, with HCA Healthcare and Intuitive Surgical Inc the worst performers on the S&amp;P 500.</p><p>HCA slumped 21.8% after reporting a downbeat profit view, while other hospital operators felt the contagion: Tenet Healthcare, Community Health Systems and Universal Health Services all tumbled between 14% and 17.9%.</p><p>Surgical robot maker Intuitive Surgical dropped 14.3% after warning of weaker demand from hospitals due to tighter finances.</p><p>All 11 major S&amp;P 500 sectors were down, although the 3.6% slip by healthcare was outdone by materials, which was off 3.7%.</p><p>Materials was weighed down by Nucor Corp - down 8.3% after hitting a record high after posting earnings on Thursday - and Freeport-McMoRan Inc, which slipped 6.8% as investors fretted over how interest rate hikes would impact copper miners.</p><p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 981.36 points, or 2.82%, to 33,811.4, the S&amp;P 500 lost 121.88 points, or 2.77%, to 4,271.78 and the Nasdaq Composite dropped 335.36 points, or 2.55%, to 12,839.29.</p><p>For the week, the Dow dipped 1.9%, the S&amp;P dropped 2.8%, and the Nasdaq declined 3.8%.</p><p>The prospect of a more hawkish Fed has led to a rocky start to the year for equities, with Friday&#39;s sell-off taking declines on both the S&amp;P and Dow since the start of the year beyond 10%.</p><p>The trend is more pronounced in tech and growth shares whose valuations are more vulnerable to rising bond yields. The Nasdaq is down 17.9% in 2022.</p><p>Earnings are due next week for the four biggest U.S. companies by market capitalization: Apple, Microsoft , Amazon and Google parent Alphabet.</p><p>The quartet declined between 2.4% and 4.1% on Friday. Meta Platforms Inc, which also has results on deck for next week, dropped 2.1%, taking its losses in the last three days to 15.3%.</p><p>Investors are worried after streaming giant Netflix Inc&#39;s dismal earnings earlier this week sent shockwaves through big tech and stay-at-home darlings which benefited from pandemic factors such as lockdown measures.</p><p>The volume on U.S. exchanges was 11.66 billion shares, compared with the 11.67 billion average for the full session over the last 20 trading days.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Wall St Slumps as Weak Earnings, Rate Hike Clarity Spook Investors</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWall St Slumps as Weak Earnings, Rate Hike Clarity Spook Investors\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-04-23 07:07</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>* Healthcare stocks slump on HCA, Intuitive Surgical numbers</p><p>* Big tech down ahead of earnings next week</p><p>* Dow posts biggest one-day fall since Oct. 2020</p><p>* Weekly falls: Dow 1.9%, S&amp;P 2.8%, Nasdaq 3.8%</p><p>* Indexes down on Friday: Dow 2.82%, S&amp;P 2.77%, Nasdaq 2.55% </p><p>April 22 (Reuters) - Wall Street tumbled more than 2.5% on Friday, ensuring the three main benchmarks ended in negative territory for the week, as surprise earnings news and increased certainty around aggressive near-term interest rate rises took its toll on investors.</p><p>It was the third straight week of losses for both the S&amp;P 500 and the Nasdaq, while the Dow Jones posted its fourth weekly decline in a row.</p><p>For the Dow, its 2.82% drop on Friday was its biggest one-day fall since October 2020.</p><p>Exaggerated trading swings have become more common recently, as traders adjust to new data points from earnings, as well as when rates will rise again. For the Nasdaq, Friday was the eighth session in April, out of 15 trading days this month, where the index either rose or fell by more than 2%.</p><p>&#34;It&#39;s not very common, over the course of my time doing this job, for the market to move 2% in either direction and to think &#39;there&#39;s not too much to read into that&#39;,&#34; said Craig Erlam, senior market analyst at OANDA.</p><p>&#34;That&#39;s not normal, but that&#39;s just how things have been for such a long time now.&#34;</p><p>Concerns about risks from interest rate hikes continued to reverberate after Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell&#39;s hawkish pivot on Thursday, where he backed moving more quickly to combat inflation and said a 50-basis-point increase would be &#34;on the table&#34; when the Fed meets in May.</p><p>The idea of &#34;front-end loading&#34; the U.S. central bank&#39;s retreat from super-easy monetary policy, which Powell articulated support for on Thursday, has also forced traders to re-evaluate how aggressive subsequent rate rises would be.</p><p>The CBOE Volatility index, also known as Wall Street&#39;s fear gauge, jumped on Friday, ending at its highest level since mid-March.</p><p>Meanwhile, the latest earnings forecasts to jolt investors came from healthcare, with HCA Healthcare and Intuitive Surgical Inc the worst performers on the S&amp;P 500.</p><p>HCA slumped 21.8% after reporting a downbeat profit view, while other hospital operators felt the contagion: Tenet Healthcare, Community Health Systems and Universal Health Services all tumbled between 14% and 17.9%.</p><p>Surgical robot maker Intuitive Surgical dropped 14.3% after warning of weaker demand from hospitals due to tighter finances.</p><p>All 11 major S&amp;P 500 sectors were down, although the 3.6% slip by healthcare was outdone by materials, which was off 3.7%.</p><p>Materials was weighed down by Nucor Corp - down 8.3% after hitting a record high after posting earnings on Thursday - and Freeport-McMoRan Inc, which slipped 6.8% as investors fretted over how interest rate hikes would impact copper miners.</p><p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 981.36 points, or 2.82%, to 33,811.4, the S&amp;P 500 lost 121.88 points, or 2.77%, to 4,271.78 and the Nasdaq Composite dropped 335.36 points, or 2.55%, to 12,839.29.</p><p>For the week, the Dow dipped 1.9%, the S&amp;P dropped 2.8%, and the Nasdaq declined 3.8%.</p><p>The prospect of a more hawkish Fed has led to a rocky start to the year for equities, with Friday&#39;s sell-off taking declines on both the S&amp;P and Dow since the start of the year beyond 10%.</p><p>The trend is more pronounced in tech and growth shares whose valuations are more vulnerable to rising bond yields. The Nasdaq is down 17.9% in 2022.</p><p>Earnings are due next week for the four biggest U.S. companies by market capitalization: Apple, Microsoft , Amazon and Google parent Alphabet.</p><p>The quartet declined between 2.4% and 4.1% on Friday. Meta Platforms Inc, which also has results on deck for next week, dropped 2.1%, taking its losses in the last three days to 15.3%.</p><p>Investors are worried after streaming giant Netflix Inc&#39;s dismal earnings earlier this week sent shockwaves through big tech and stay-at-home darlings which benefited from pandemic factors such as lockdown measures.</p><p>The volume on U.S. exchanges was 11.66 billion shares, compared with the 11.67 billion average for the full session over the last 20 trading days.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"HCA":"HCA控股",".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite","ISRG":"直觉外科公司",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2229641491","content_text":"* Healthcare stocks slump on HCA, Intuitive Surgical numbers* Big tech down ahead of earnings next week* Dow posts biggest one-day fall since Oct. 2020* Weekly falls: Dow 1.9%, S&P 2.8%, Nasdaq 3.8%* Indexes down on Friday: Dow 2.82%, S&P 2.77%, Nasdaq 2.55% April 22 (Reuters) - Wall Street tumbled more than 2.5% on Friday, ensuring the three main benchmarks ended in negative territory for the week, as surprise earnings news and increased certainty around aggressive near-term interest rate rises took its toll on investors.It was the third straight week of losses for both the S&P 500 and the Nasdaq, while the Dow Jones posted its fourth weekly decline in a row.For the Dow, its 2.82% drop on Friday was its biggest one-day fall since October 2020.Exaggerated trading swings have become more common recently, as traders adjust to new data points from earnings, as well as when rates will rise again. For the Nasdaq, Friday was the eighth session in April, out of 15 trading days this month, where the index either rose or fell by more than 2%.\"It's not very common, over the course of my time doing this job, for the market to move 2% in either direction and to think 'there's not too much to read into that',\" said Craig Erlam, senior market analyst at OANDA.\"That's not normal, but that's just how things have been for such a long time now.\"Concerns about risks from interest rate hikes continued to reverberate after Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell's hawkish pivot on Thursday, where he backed moving more quickly to combat inflation and said a 50-basis-point increase would be \"on the table\" when the Fed meets in May.The idea of \"front-end loading\" the U.S. central bank's retreat from super-easy monetary policy, which Powell articulated support for on Thursday, has also forced traders to re-evaluate how aggressive subsequent rate rises would be.The CBOE Volatility index, also known as Wall Street's fear gauge, jumped on Friday, ending at its highest level since mid-March.Meanwhile, the latest earnings forecasts to jolt investors came from healthcare, with HCA Healthcare and Intuitive Surgical Inc the worst performers on the S&P 500.HCA slumped 21.8% after reporting a downbeat profit view, while other hospital operators felt the contagion: Tenet Healthcare, Community Health Systems and Universal Health Services all tumbled between 14% and 17.9%.Surgical robot maker Intuitive Surgical dropped 14.3% after warning of weaker demand from hospitals due to tighter finances.All 11 major S&P 500 sectors were down, although the 3.6% slip by healthcare was outdone by materials, which was off 3.7%.Materials was weighed down by Nucor Corp - down 8.3% after hitting a record high after posting earnings on Thursday - and Freeport-McMoRan Inc, which slipped 6.8% as investors fretted over how interest rate hikes would impact copper miners.The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 981.36 points, or 2.82%, to 33,811.4, the S&P 500 lost 121.88 points, or 2.77%, to 4,271.78 and the Nasdaq Composite dropped 335.36 points, or 2.55%, to 12,839.29.For the week, the Dow dipped 1.9%, the S&P dropped 2.8%, and the Nasdaq declined 3.8%.The prospect of a more hawkish Fed has led to a rocky start to the year for equities, with Friday's sell-off taking declines on both the S&P and Dow since the start of the year beyond 10%.The trend is more pronounced in tech and growth shares whose valuations are more vulnerable to rising bond yields. The Nasdaq is down 17.9% in 2022.Earnings are due next week for the four biggest U.S. companies by market capitalization: Apple, Microsoft , Amazon and Google parent Alphabet.The quartet declined between 2.4% and 4.1% on Friday. Meta Platforms Inc, which also has results on deck for next week, dropped 2.1%, taking its losses in the last three days to 15.3%.Investors are worried after streaming giant Netflix Inc's dismal earnings earlier this week sent shockwaves through big tech and stay-at-home darlings which benefited from pandemic factors such as lockdown measures.The volume on U.S. exchanges was 11.66 billion shares, compared with the 11.67 billion average for the full session over the last 20 trading days.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":752,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":838492292,"gmtCreate":1629422852016,"gmtModify":1676530034859,"author":{"id":"3576444918223783","authorId":"3576444918223783","name":"Damien Khoo","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/f08d9f6bdc3c0038e9aa81591b4df363","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576444918223783","authorIdStr":"3576444918223783"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"That’s explain why she continued to buy millions of PLTR shares.&nbsp;","listText":"That’s explain why she continued to buy millions of PLTR shares.&nbsp;","text":"That’s explain why she continued to buy millions of PLTR shares.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/838492292","repostId":"2160848793","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2160848793","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1629420499,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2160848793?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-08-20 08:48","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Ark's Cathie Wood says stock market 'couldn't be further away from a bubble.' Here's why.","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2160848793","media":"MarketWatch","summary":"Wood says she's emboldened by bad news\nCathie Wood, chief executive officer and chief investment off","content":"<p>Wood says she's emboldened by bad news</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1b1e646cb0a6ddf4ac942ed5c913a4e4\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Cathie Wood, chief executive officer and chief investment officer of ARK Investment Management</span></p>\n<p>There'a growing sense of unease emanating from equity markets in recent trade, despite, and perhaps because, of the Dow Jones Industrial Average and the S&amp;P 500 index trading near record heights.</p>\n<p>However, star investor Cathie Wood, who runs a suite of popular ETFs in Ark Investment Management, says that there's no reason to fear that the market is becoming too bubblicious.</p>\n<p>As the Ark founder puts it: \"I don't think we're in a bubble which is what I think many bears think we are,\" during a Thursday interview with CNBC near midday .</p>\n<p>Her comments coming amid intensifying worries about a possible slowdown in economic growth as the delta variant of COVID-19 gathers momentum, creating headwinds for a fuller recovery from the pandemic that has gripped the globe for well over a year.</p>\n<p>Investors also have been wringing their hands over the prospects of the Federal Reserve scaling back easy-money policies, notably the monthly purchases of $120 billion in Treasurys and mortage-backed securities, as anxieties grow.</p>\n<p>Wood's investment funds, highlighted by the flagship Ark Innovation, have been <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> area that has been cited as possibly overvalued and vulnerable to a dramatic swing lower if the market starts to deflate considerably from its current levels.</p>\n<p>Ark Innovation ETF is down 5.2% so far this week and has lost 8.6% in the year to date, badly underperforming the broader market and coming after the fund rang up one-year return of 149%, FactSet data show.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5cca916bae90134d64f9ba249031e782\" tg-width=\"949\" tg-height=\"666\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p>\n<p>By comparison , the Dow Jones Industrial Average is down 1.8% this week but up 14% this year, while the technology-laden Nasdaq Composite Index is off 1.9% on the week but has risen over 12.8% so far in 2021, and the broad-market S&amp;P 500 index is off 1.4% in the week to date but boasts a nearly 17.3% gain for 2021.</p>\n<p>Wood's view on the market, however, is that investors are acting much more sedately and prudently, compared with the euphoria that was characteristic of the late 1990s and early 2000s dot-com boom.</p>\n<p>\"In a bubble...and I remember the late '90s...our strategies would have been cheered on,\" she told the business network. \"You remember the leapfrogging of analysts making estimates one higher than the other, price targets one higher than the other,\" she said on \"Tech Check.\"</p>\n<p>She also noted that negative sentiment in the market as a contra-indication, suggesting that growing pessimism may actually fuel further gains rather than inflating a bubble.</p>\n<p>\"I like bad news,\" she said.</p>\n<p>\"When I see such negative sentiment out there, especially when it comes to valuation and longer time horizons, investment time horizons, I actually feel a little more comfortable,\" Wood said.</p>","source":"lsy1603348471595","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Ark's Cathie Wood says stock market 'couldn't be further away from a bubble.' Here's why.</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nArk's Cathie Wood says stock market 'couldn't be further away from a bubble.' Here's why.\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-08-20 08:48 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.marketwatch.com/story/arks-cathie-wood-says-stock-market-couldnt-be-further-away-from-a-bubble-heres-why-11629393761?adobe_mc=MCORGID%3DCB68E4BA55144CAA0A4C98A5%2540AdobeOrg%7CTS%3D1629420103><strong>MarketWatch</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Wood says she's emboldened by bad news\nCathie Wood, chief executive officer and chief investment officer of ARK Investment Management\nThere'a growing sense of unease emanating from equity markets in ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/arks-cathie-wood-says-stock-market-couldnt-be-further-away-from-a-bubble-heres-why-11629393761?adobe_mc=MCORGID%3DCB68E4BA55144CAA0A4C98A5%2540AdobeOrg%7CTS%3D1629420103\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","ARKK":"ARK Innovation ETF"},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/arks-cathie-wood-says-stock-market-couldnt-be-further-away-from-a-bubble-heres-why-11629393761?adobe_mc=MCORGID%3DCB68E4BA55144CAA0A4C98A5%2540AdobeOrg%7CTS%3D1629420103","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2160848793","content_text":"Wood says she's emboldened by bad news\nCathie Wood, chief executive officer and chief investment officer of ARK Investment Management\nThere'a growing sense of unease emanating from equity markets in recent trade, despite, and perhaps because, of the Dow Jones Industrial Average and the S&P 500 index trading near record heights.\nHowever, star investor Cathie Wood, who runs a suite of popular ETFs in Ark Investment Management, says that there's no reason to fear that the market is becoming too bubblicious.\nAs the Ark founder puts it: \"I don't think we're in a bubble which is what I think many bears think we are,\" during a Thursday interview with CNBC near midday .\nHer comments coming amid intensifying worries about a possible slowdown in economic growth as the delta variant of COVID-19 gathers momentum, creating headwinds for a fuller recovery from the pandemic that has gripped the globe for well over a year.\nInvestors also have been wringing their hands over the prospects of the Federal Reserve scaling back easy-money policies, notably the monthly purchases of $120 billion in Treasurys and mortage-backed securities, as anxieties grow.\nWood's investment funds, highlighted by the flagship Ark Innovation, have been one area that has been cited as possibly overvalued and vulnerable to a dramatic swing lower if the market starts to deflate considerably from its current levels.\nArk Innovation ETF is down 5.2% so far this week and has lost 8.6% in the year to date, badly underperforming the broader market and coming after the fund rang up one-year return of 149%, FactSet data show.\n\nBy comparison , the Dow Jones Industrial Average is down 1.8% this week but up 14% this year, while the technology-laden Nasdaq Composite Index is off 1.9% on the week but has risen over 12.8% so far in 2021, and the broad-market S&P 500 index is off 1.4% in the week to date but boasts a nearly 17.3% gain for 2021.\nWood's view on the market, however, is that investors are acting much more sedately and prudently, compared with the euphoria that was characteristic of the late 1990s and early 2000s dot-com boom.\n\"In a bubble...and I remember the late '90s...our strategies would have been cheered on,\" she told the business network. \"You remember the leapfrogging of analysts making estimates one higher than the other, price targets one higher than the other,\" she said on \"Tech Check.\"\nShe also noted that negative sentiment in the market as a contra-indication, suggesting that growing pessimism may actually fuel further gains rather than inflating a bubble.\n\"I like bad news,\" she said.\n\"When I see such negative sentiment out there, especially when it comes to valuation and longer time horizons, investment time horizons, I actually feel a little more comfortable,\" Wood said.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":106,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[{"author":{"id":"3564398446314499","authorId":"3564398446314499","name":"Gibbie","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ac29ad2a0a11289a908ae00b770dc0c5","crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3564398446314499","authorIdStr":"3564398446314499"},"content":"buy arkk pltr","text":"buy arkk pltr","html":"buy arkk pltr"}],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":898303709,"gmtCreate":1628471700601,"gmtModify":1703506520205,"author":{"id":"3576444918223783","authorId":"3576444918223783","name":"Damien Khoo","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/f08d9f6bdc3c0038e9aa81591b4df363","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576444918223783","authorIdStr":"3576444918223783"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"BNTX had gone up a lot. I think the earningsare already priced into the share price. Well,let’s see.&nbsp;","listText":"BNTX had gone up a lot. I think the earningsare already priced into the share price. Well,let’s see.&nbsp;","text":"BNTX had gone up a lot. I think the earningsare already priced into the share price. Well,let’s see.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":8,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/898303709","repostId":"1162909436","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1162909436","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1628463995,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1162909436?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-08-09 07:06","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Disney, AMC, Coinbase, Airbnb, BioNTech, and Other Stocks for Investors to Watch This Week","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1162909436","media":"Barron's","summary":"The bulk of second-quarter earnings season is in the rearview mirror, but several notable reports re","content":"<p>The bulk of second-quarter earnings season is in the rearview mirror,&nbsp;but several notable reports remain.&nbsp;AMC Entertainment Holdings,&nbsp;BioNTech, and&nbsp;Dish Network&nbsp;will be Monday’s highlights.&nbsp;Coinbase&nbsp;Global and&nbsp;Syscogo on Tuesday. On Wednesday,&nbsp;eBay&nbsp;will report, followed by Walt&nbsp;Disney,&nbsp;Airbnb,&nbsp;DoorDash,&nbsp;and&nbsp;Broadridge Financial Solutionson Thursday.</p>\n<p>The week’s economic calendar will include a pair of updates each on consumer and business inflation and sentiment. On Wednesday, the Bureau of Labor Statistics will&nbsp;report&nbsp;the consumer price index for July, followed by the producer price index on Thursday. Those are expected to have increased by 5.3% and 7.3%, respectively, year over year.</p>\n<p>On Tuesday, the National Federation of Independent Business will release its Small Business Optimism Index for July. And on Friday, the University of Michigan reports its Consumer Sentiment index for August. Both are forecast to hold roughly even with the prior months’ figures.</p>\n<h3><b>Monday 8/9</b></h3>\n<p>Air Products and Chemicals,&nbsp;<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMC\">AMC Entertainment</a>,&nbsp;Barrick Gold,&nbsp;<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BNTX\">BioNTech SE</a>, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DISH\">DISH Network</a>, and&nbsp;<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSN\">Tyson</a>&nbsp;report quarterly results.</p>\n<p><b>The Bureau of Labor Statistics</b>&nbsp;reports the Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey for June. Economists forecast 9.1 million openings on the last business day of June, slightly less than the May figure. Job openings stand at record levels as employers struggle to fill vacant positions.</p>\n<h3><b>Tuesday 8/10</b></h3>\n<p><b>The National Federation of Independent Business</b>&nbsp;reports its Small Business Optimism Index for July. Consensus estimate is for a 102.8 reading, roughly even with the June data, which was the highest since October.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/COIN\">Coinbase Global, Inc.</a>, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SYY\">Sysco</a>, and&nbsp;<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TDG\">TransDigm</a> announce earnings.</p>\n<p><b>The BLS reports unit labor</b>&nbsp;costs and nonfarm productivity for the second quarter. Expectations are for a rise of 0.9% in labor costs and 3.4% for productivity. This compares with increases of 1.7% and 5.4%, respectively, in the first quarter.</p>\n<h3><b>Wednesday 8/11</b></h3>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/EBAY\">eBay</a> and&nbsp;<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PRGO\">Perrigo Co PLC</a> release quarterly results.</p>\n<p><b>The BLS reports the consumer</b>&nbsp;price index for July. Economists forecast a 5.3% increase year over year, after a gain of 5.4% in June. The core CPI, which excludes volatile food and energy prices, is expected to rise 4.3%, compared with 4.5% previously. Inflation, and whether it is transitory, has generated much discussion on Wall Street this year, with the June CPI showing the fastest pace of growth since July 2008 and core CPI rising at the swiftest clip in nearly 30 years.</p>\n<p><b>The Treasury Department</b>&nbsp;releases the monthly budget statement for July. The estimated deficit is $267 billion for the month, and $3 trillion for fiscal 2021, which ends in September. The $3 trillion would be just shy of fiscal 2020’s $3.1 trillion deficit, a record.</p>\n<h3><b>Thursday 8/12</b></h3>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ABNB\">Airbnb, Inc.</a>, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BR\">Broadridge Financial Solutions</a>,&nbsp;<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BAM\">Brookfield Asset Management</a>,&nbsp;<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DASH\">DoorDash, Inc.</a>, and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DIS\">Walt Disney</a> hold conference calls to discuss earnings.</p>\n<p>Idexx Laboratorieshosts its 2021 virtual investor day.</p>\n<p><b>The BLS reports the</b>&nbsp;producer price index for July. Consensus estimate is for a 0.4% month-over-month rise. The core PPI, which excludes volatile food and energy prices, is projected to increase 0.5%. The PPI and core PPI, both jumped 1% in June.</p>\n<p><b>The Department of Labor</b>&nbsp;reports initial jobless claims for the weekend ending on Aug. 7. In July, claims averaged 392,000 a week, slightly less than the June data. Jobless claims have trended down since peaking in the spring of 2020 but remain elevated compared with prepandemic levels.</p>\n<h3><b>Friday 8/13</b></h3>\n<p><b>The University of Michigan</b>&nbsp;releases its Consumer Sentiment index for August. Expectations are for an 81.1 reading, roughly even with the July figure.</p>","source":"lsy1610680873436","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Disney, AMC, Coinbase, Airbnb, BioNTech, and Other Stocks for Investors to Watch This Week</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nDisney, AMC, Coinbase, Airbnb, BioNTech, and Other Stocks for Investors to Watch This Week\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-08-09 07:06 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.barrons.com/articles/disney-amc-coinbase-airbnb-biontech-and-other-stocks-for-investors-to-watch-this-week-51628449233?mod=hp_LEAD_4?mod=article_signInButton><strong>Barron's</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The bulk of second-quarter earnings season is in the rearview mirror, but several notable reports remain. AMC Entertainment Holdings, BioNTech, and Dish Network will be Monday’s highlights. Coinbase ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/disney-amc-coinbase-airbnb-biontech-and-other-stocks-for-investors-to-watch-this-week-51628449233?mod=hp_LEAD_4?mod=article_signInButton\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","EBAY":"eBay","BR":"Broadridge金融解决方案","ABNB":"爱彼迎","PRGO":"百利高","COIN":"Coinbase Global, Inc.","DIS":"迪士尼","BAM":"布鲁克菲尔德资产管理",".DJI":"道琼斯","TDG":"TransDigm","AMC":"AMC院线",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/disney-amc-coinbase-airbnb-biontech-and-other-stocks-for-investors-to-watch-this-week-51628449233?mod=hp_LEAD_4?mod=article_signInButton","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1162909436","content_text":"The bulk of second-quarter earnings season is in the rearview mirror, but several notable reports remain. AMC Entertainment Holdings, BioNTech, and Dish Network will be Monday’s highlights. Coinbase Global and Syscogo on Tuesday. On Wednesday, eBay will report, followed by Walt Disney, Airbnb, DoorDash, and Broadridge Financial Solutionson Thursday.\nThe week’s economic calendar will include a pair of updates each on consumer and business inflation and sentiment. On Wednesday, the Bureau of Labor Statistics will report the consumer price index for July, followed by the producer price index on Thursday. Those are expected to have increased by 5.3% and 7.3%, respectively, year over year.\nOn Tuesday, the National Federation of Independent Business will release its Small Business Optimism Index for July. And on Friday, the University of Michigan reports its Consumer Sentiment index for August. Both are forecast to hold roughly even with the prior months’ figures.\nMonday 8/9\nAir Products and Chemicals, AMC Entertainment, Barrick Gold, BioNTech SE, DISH Network, and Tyson report quarterly results.\nThe Bureau of Labor Statistics reports the Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey for June. Economists forecast 9.1 million openings on the last business day of June, slightly less than the May figure. Job openings stand at record levels as employers struggle to fill vacant positions.\nTuesday 8/10\nThe National Federation of Independent Business reports its Small Business Optimism Index for July. Consensus estimate is for a 102.8 reading, roughly even with the June data, which was the highest since October.\nCoinbase Global, Inc., Sysco, and TransDigm announce earnings.\nThe BLS reports unit labor costs and nonfarm productivity for the second quarter. Expectations are for a rise of 0.9% in labor costs and 3.4% for productivity. This compares with increases of 1.7% and 5.4%, respectively, in the first quarter.\nWednesday 8/11\neBay and Perrigo Co PLC release quarterly results.\nThe BLS reports the consumer price index for July. Economists forecast a 5.3% increase year over year, after a gain of 5.4% in June. The core CPI, which excludes volatile food and energy prices, is expected to rise 4.3%, compared with 4.5% previously. Inflation, and whether it is transitory, has generated much discussion on Wall Street this year, with the June CPI showing the fastest pace of growth since July 2008 and core CPI rising at the swiftest clip in nearly 30 years.\nThe Treasury Department releases the monthly budget statement for July. The estimated deficit is $267 billion for the month, and $3 trillion for fiscal 2021, which ends in September. The $3 trillion would be just shy of fiscal 2020’s $3.1 trillion deficit, a record.\nThursday 8/12\nAirbnb, Inc., Broadridge Financial Solutions, Brookfield Asset Management, DoorDash, Inc., and Walt Disney hold conference calls to discuss earnings.\nIdexx Laboratorieshosts its 2021 virtual investor day.\nThe BLS reports the producer price index for July. Consensus estimate is for a 0.4% month-over-month rise. The core PPI, which excludes volatile food and energy prices, is projected to increase 0.5%. The PPI and core PPI, both jumped 1% in June.\nThe Department of Labor reports initial jobless claims for the weekend ending on Aug. 7. In July, claims averaged 392,000 a week, slightly less than the June data. Jobless claims have trended down since peaking in the spring of 2020 but remain elevated compared with prepandemic levels.\nFriday 8/13\nThe University of Michigan releases its Consumer Sentiment index for August. Expectations are for an 81.1 reading, roughly even with the July figure.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":94,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":177361410,"gmtCreate":1627181308630,"gmtModify":1703485173009,"author":{"id":"3576444918223783","authorId":"3576444918223783","name":"Damien Khoo","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/f08d9f6bdc3c0038e9aa81591b4df363","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576444918223783","authorIdStr":"3576444918223783"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Tesla is definitely the bigger one right now. But NIO in my opinion has more growth potential&nbsp;","listText":"Tesla is definitely the bigger one right now. But NIO in my opinion has more growth potential&nbsp;","text":"Tesla is definitely the bigger one right now. But NIO in my opinion has more growth potential","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/177361410","repostId":"1112927800","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1112927800","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1627089375,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1112927800?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-24 09:16","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Will NIO Stock Follow Tesla's Footsteps? What To Consider Between These Two EV Stocks","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1112927800","media":"seekingalpha","summary":"Let's take a look at how NIO compares to Tesla today, NIO's unique selling points, and the similarities between the two companies.NIO is a high-growth choice that does not seem overly expensive relative to how Tesla is valued.NIO is not a low-risk stock, however, and it may not be a good choice for everyone. Investors should also consider NIO's valuation versus legacy car companies.Both companies have benefitted from growing interest in EVs during 2020, a trend that saw share prices of most EV p","content":"<p><b>Summary</b></p>\n<ul>\n <li>Let's take a look at how NIO compares to Tesla today, NIO's unique selling points, and the similarities between the two companies.</li>\n <li>NIO is a high-growth choice that does not seem overly expensive relative to how Tesla is valued.</li>\n <li>NIO is not a low-risk stock, however, and it may not be a good choice for everyone. Investors should also consider NIO's valuation versus legacy car companies.</li>\n</ul>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2f749c70c8a2af3e18d5f6cecc72bfbb\" tg-width=\"1536\" tg-height=\"704\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>ipopba/iStock via Getty Images</span></p>\n<p><b>Article Thesis</b></p>\n<p>NIO, Inc. (NIO) is one of China's leading EV players, and has, through an attractive brand and its unique BaaS offering, attracted a lot of interest from consumers and investors. Today, however, the company is still way smaller than Tesla (TSLA), which is currently leading the global EV market. NIO is focused on its home market right now, which was true when Tesla was a smaller company as well, but NIO will try to grab market share in overseas markets as well. Shares are pricing in a lot of growth already, but if NIO can replicate Tesla's success, that could be more than justified.</p>\n<p><b>NIO And TSLA Stock Prices</b></p>\n<p>Both companies have benefitted from growing interest in EVs during 2020, a trend that saw share prices of most EV pureplays rise rapidly. The combination of growing market share for EVs, accommodating policies such as subsidies for EV purchases, and massive monetary stimulus let shares of NIO and TSLA rise rapidly. NIO is up 245% over the last year, while TSLA is up 101% over the same time. Both companies are currently trading below their all-time highs, however, which were hit in early 2021 before market sentiment for EV pureplays cooled to some degree.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5ff5ce865807df85283775d2293b41af\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"481\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>Data by YCharts</span></p>\n<p>Taking a quick look at analyst price targets, we see that Tesla is trading almost perfectly in line with the consensus, whereas NIO trades about 30% below the analyst target. If the analyst community is right, then NIO is a substantially better investment right here, as Tesla is not expected to see its shares rise meaningfully over the next year, whereas NIO has significant upside to the analyst price target.</p>\n<p><b>Is NIO Similar To Tesla?</b></p>\n<p>The answer to that question depends on what you focus on. There are similarities between the two companies, but there are also differences. One could thus say that, in some ways, the two are similar, but in others, they are not. Let's look at a couple of things:</p>\n<p><b>Business Model</b></p>\n<p>Both companies are focused on the EV space, although Tesla has, over the years, been building out a couple of other businesses as well, such as energy storage. Most of Tesla's revenues are generated through selling electric vehicles, which is also how NIO operates. Both companies are focused on the premium segment of EVs, selling higher-priced vehicles that compete with brands such as BMW, Mercedes, and Lexus. Both companies offer a small range of different vehicles, in Tesla's case those are the well-known S, X, 3, and Y, whereas NIO offers a sedan (ET7), and three SUVs (EC6, ES6, ES8). Despite the fact that NIO is a way smaller company today, the model lineups of the two companies do thus not differ too much.</p>\n<p>Both companies offer some type of charging infrastructure to their customers, in Tesla's case, that's the Supercharger network, where Tesla owners can charge their cars with up to 250kW, depending on what version of Supercharger is installed. NIO is following a different approach, offering a battery-as-a-service solution to its customers. NIO owners can get their battery switched out to a fully-charged battery at NIO's stations, a process that takes a couple of minutes and is thus significantly quicker compared to the regular EV charging offered by Tesla and other EV players. BaaS thus has advantages when it comes to the time it takes for a charge/swap, but it should be noted that Tesla's Superchargers are way more common around the world compared to NIO's battery-swapping stations. Rolling out that feature in additional markets will require large capital expenditures, but NIO's offering is a unique selling point compared to what all other EV players, including Tesla, are offering. It remains to be seen whether that will ultimately pay off, but this could become a major advantage for NIO as competition in the EV space is heating up.</p>\n<p><b>Size, growth, and valuation</b></p>\n<p>The two companies differ significantly in size, both when it comes to revenues and vehicle sales, as well as when it comes to the market value of the two companies. NIO has delivered22,000 vehicles in Q2, up 112% year over year, for an annual pace of around 90,000 vehicles. Tesla, meanwhile, has delivered 201,000 vehicles during Q2, up from 103,000 vehicles delivered during Q2 2020. This is strong growth on a year-over-year basis, although slightly below 100%, and thus below the growth rate that NIO is generating for now.</p>\n<p>Tesla delivers around 9x as many vehicles compared to NIO per quarter, when we look at the market capitalizations of the two companies, we see that the ratio is almost exactly the same, as Tesla's market cap of $640 billion is ~9x as high as that of NIO, at $72 billion. At similar growth rates, that would make perfect sense, but it looks like NIO might be the better deal for now, as it trades at a comparable valuation while generating better growth. This will be especially true in the coming quarters, where Tesla's growth is expected to slow down:</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a986ea65130206f99961a46ce6cfed55\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"515\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>Data by YCharts</span></p>\n<p>Tesla is forecasted to grow its revenue from $49 billion in 2021 to $83 billion in 2023, for an annual growth rate of 30%. NIO, meanwhile, is expected to see its revenue explode upwards from $5.4 billion to $12.8 billion between 2021 and 2023, for an annual growth rate of 54%. NIO is thus expected to grow way faster than Tesla over the next two years, on a relative basis. This shouldn't be a surprise, to be honest, as the law of large numbers dictates that maintaining massive growth rates becomes increasingly hard for a company the bigger it gets, and Tesla seems to have hit that point by now -- adding 50%+ a year to its top line will not be possible forever. This isn't even necessarily Tesla's fault, in fact, many high-quality growth companies have experienced the same. But investors should still consider this important fact -- Tesla's growth in coming years will be less exciting compared to what we have seen in the past, and peers, such as NIO, are growing faster.</p>\n<p>The same holds true when we take a longer-term view. Revenue estimates for 2025 rest at$22.6 billionfor NIO, up another 80% from the 2023 estimate, and up 320% from what analysts are forecasting for 2021. Tesla, meanwhile, is forecasted to generate revenues of $122.5 billion in 2025 -- a large number, but up by a comparatively weak 48% from 2023, and up by a total of 150% versus 2021. Between 2021 and 2025, NIO will thus 4x its revenue, while Tesla will 2.5x its revenue in the same time span -- a meaningful difference that should, all else equal, allow for a premium valuation for NIO, in the same way Tesla deserves a premium valuation versus legacy players such as Volkswagen (OTCPK:VWAGY).</p>\n<p>Looking at revenue estimates for 2025 relative to how the two companies are valued today, we see that NIO trades at 3.2x 2025 sales, while the 2025 sales multiple for Tesla is 5.2. For a long-term oriented investor, NIO thus seems like the better value today, thanks to the fact that it is trading at a significantly lower sales multiple when we take a look into the future. This does not necessarily mean that NIO is cheap, however, as even a 3.2x 2025 sales multiple is relatively high compared to how legacy auto companies are valued. NIO is looking less expensive than Tesla, however, even if its shares are not cheap on an absolute basis.</p>\n<p><b>Can NIO Be Worth As Much As Tesla?</b></p>\n<p>The answer to that depends on what time frame you are looking at. Today, NIO is significantly smaller than Tesla and thus rightfully trades at a way smaller market cap. It should also be noted that there is no guarantee that Tesla's shares are a great example of how an EV company should be valued -- it is, at least, possible that its shares are significantly&nbsp;overpriced&nbsp;today, I personally believe that as well (Note that some will argue that shares are&nbsp;underpriced, which is also among the possibilities, although I do not hold that belief personally).</p>\n<p>When we do, for a moment, assume that Tesla is correctly valued today and that EV companies do deserve a market cap in the $600 billion range when they sell about 800,000 vehicles a year, then NIO could eventually hit that as well, although not in the near term. NIO will sell about 90,000 vehicles this year, and that amount should grow to about 400,000 in 2025. If NIO were to grow its sales by 15% a year beyond that point, it could sell around 800,000 cars in 2030, or 9 years from now. If one wants to assume faster growth, the 800,000 vehicles a year line could also be crossed before 2030, e.g. in 2028 or 2029. If we do go with 2030 for now, then NIO could, at a similar deliveries-to-market capitalization ratio to Tesla, be valued at $600+ billion in 2030. In other words, NIO could be worth as much as Tesla (today) in nine years, when we assume that current growth projections are realistic and that a Tesla-like valuation is appropriate. Those are two major ifs, of course, and especially the second point is far from certain, I believe. I personally would not be too surprised to see Tesla's valuation compress, and thus NIO could trade well below the $600 billion market cap level in 2030, even if it continues to grow meaningfully. It is also possible that NIO's growth disappoints and that current projections are too bullish, although I think that NIO is well-positioned for growth thanks to its unique BaaS model and its strong brand that is especially well-recognized in its home market.</p>\n<p>It should also be noted that Tesla's market cap in 2030 could be very different from $600 billion, thus even in case NIO hits that level, it is not at all guaranteed that the two companies will have a similar market cap. Tesla might be valued at a way higher valuation by then, e.g. if the ARK model is right (something I personally think is unlikely). To answer the above question, one could thus say that NIO might be worth hundreds of billions of dollars, like Tesla, in 8-10 years, but that is not at all guaranteed. And even if that were to happen, Tesla might be worth significantly more by then.</p>\n<p><b>Is NIO A Good Stock To Buy Or Sell Now?</b></p>\n<p>When considering NIO as an investment, it doesn't really matter all that much whether it will become as large or highly valued as Tesla eventually. Instead, investors should ask themselves what total returns they can expect over the next couple of years, and whether those expected returns are high enough relative to the risks in NIO's business model. Regarding those risks, one should mention the fact that the company isn't profitable yet, which means that NIO is dependent on cash on its balance sheet for growth investments. On top of that, competition in the EV space is growing, and market share battles could pressure margins in coming years, although NIO seems relatively well-positioned thanks to its battery-swapping, which is, I believe, a strong USP. Last but not least, the company's dependence on its home market China is a potential risk that should be kept in mind, although it should also be noted that, for now, it seems like the Chinese government is very accommodating to Chinese EV companies.</p>\n<p>One could argue that valuations across the whole EV industry are too high, relative to how legacy auto companies are valued. Even those legacy players with attractive EV offerings such as Volkswagen or Ford trade at huge discounts compared to EV pureplays. But if one wants to invest in an EV pureplay, NIO doesn't seem like a bad choice. The company combines a strong brand, a unique BaaS offering, high growth rates, and shares trade at a discount compared to how the EV king Tesla is valued. At a little above 3x 2025 revenue, NIO does not seem overly expensive relative to other EV pureplays, although this still represents a premium versus legacy players, of course. If NIO manages to execute well and continues to roll out new models that are well-received by consumers, its shares could have significant upside potential in the long run. If EV stocks ever become an out-of-favor investment, NIO stock also could have considerable downside, however, this thus is not a low-risk pick. Depending on your risk tolerance, NIO could still be of value if you want a high-growth EV pureplay.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Will NIO Stock Follow Tesla's Footsteps? What To Consider Between These Two EV Stocks</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWill NIO Stock Follow Tesla's Footsteps? What To Consider Between These Two EV Stocks\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-24 09:16 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4440950-will-nio-stock-follow-tesla-what-to-consider-ev-stocks><strong>seekingalpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Summary\n\nLet's take a look at how NIO compares to Tesla today, NIO's unique selling points, and the similarities between the two companies.\nNIO is a high-growth choice that does not seem overly ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4440950-will-nio-stock-follow-tesla-what-to-consider-ev-stocks\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NIO":"蔚来","TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4440950-will-nio-stock-follow-tesla-what-to-consider-ev-stocks","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1112927800","content_text":"Summary\n\nLet's take a look at how NIO compares to Tesla today, NIO's unique selling points, and the similarities between the two companies.\nNIO is a high-growth choice that does not seem overly expensive relative to how Tesla is valued.\nNIO is not a low-risk stock, however, and it may not be a good choice for everyone. Investors should also consider NIO's valuation versus legacy car companies.\n\nipopba/iStock via Getty Images\nArticle Thesis\nNIO, Inc. (NIO) is one of China's leading EV players, and has, through an attractive brand and its unique BaaS offering, attracted a lot of interest from consumers and investors. Today, however, the company is still way smaller than Tesla (TSLA), which is currently leading the global EV market. NIO is focused on its home market right now, which was true when Tesla was a smaller company as well, but NIO will try to grab market share in overseas markets as well. Shares are pricing in a lot of growth already, but if NIO can replicate Tesla's success, that could be more than justified.\nNIO And TSLA Stock Prices\nBoth companies have benefitted from growing interest in EVs during 2020, a trend that saw share prices of most EV pureplays rise rapidly. The combination of growing market share for EVs, accommodating policies such as subsidies for EV purchases, and massive monetary stimulus let shares of NIO and TSLA rise rapidly. NIO is up 245% over the last year, while TSLA is up 101% over the same time. Both companies are currently trading below their all-time highs, however, which were hit in early 2021 before market sentiment for EV pureplays cooled to some degree.\nData by YCharts\nTaking a quick look at analyst price targets, we see that Tesla is trading almost perfectly in line with the consensus, whereas NIO trades about 30% below the analyst target. If the analyst community is right, then NIO is a substantially better investment right here, as Tesla is not expected to see its shares rise meaningfully over the next year, whereas NIO has significant upside to the analyst price target.\nIs NIO Similar To Tesla?\nThe answer to that question depends on what you focus on. There are similarities between the two companies, but there are also differences. One could thus say that, in some ways, the two are similar, but in others, they are not. Let's look at a couple of things:\nBusiness Model\nBoth companies are focused on the EV space, although Tesla has, over the years, been building out a couple of other businesses as well, such as energy storage. Most of Tesla's revenues are generated through selling electric vehicles, which is also how NIO operates. Both companies are focused on the premium segment of EVs, selling higher-priced vehicles that compete with brands such as BMW, Mercedes, and Lexus. Both companies offer a small range of different vehicles, in Tesla's case those are the well-known S, X, 3, and Y, whereas NIO offers a sedan (ET7), and three SUVs (EC6, ES6, ES8). Despite the fact that NIO is a way smaller company today, the model lineups of the two companies do thus not differ too much.\nBoth companies offer some type of charging infrastructure to their customers, in Tesla's case, that's the Supercharger network, where Tesla owners can charge their cars with up to 250kW, depending on what version of Supercharger is installed. NIO is following a different approach, offering a battery-as-a-service solution to its customers. NIO owners can get their battery switched out to a fully-charged battery at NIO's stations, a process that takes a couple of minutes and is thus significantly quicker compared to the regular EV charging offered by Tesla and other EV players. BaaS thus has advantages when it comes to the time it takes for a charge/swap, but it should be noted that Tesla's Superchargers are way more common around the world compared to NIO's battery-swapping stations. Rolling out that feature in additional markets will require large capital expenditures, but NIO's offering is a unique selling point compared to what all other EV players, including Tesla, are offering. It remains to be seen whether that will ultimately pay off, but this could become a major advantage for NIO as competition in the EV space is heating up.\nSize, growth, and valuation\nThe two companies differ significantly in size, both when it comes to revenues and vehicle sales, as well as when it comes to the market value of the two companies. NIO has delivered22,000 vehicles in Q2, up 112% year over year, for an annual pace of around 90,000 vehicles. Tesla, meanwhile, has delivered 201,000 vehicles during Q2, up from 103,000 vehicles delivered during Q2 2020. This is strong growth on a year-over-year basis, although slightly below 100%, and thus below the growth rate that NIO is generating for now.\nTesla delivers around 9x as many vehicles compared to NIO per quarter, when we look at the market capitalizations of the two companies, we see that the ratio is almost exactly the same, as Tesla's market cap of $640 billion is ~9x as high as that of NIO, at $72 billion. At similar growth rates, that would make perfect sense, but it looks like NIO might be the better deal for now, as it trades at a comparable valuation while generating better growth. This will be especially true in the coming quarters, where Tesla's growth is expected to slow down:\nData by YCharts\nTesla is forecasted to grow its revenue from $49 billion in 2021 to $83 billion in 2023, for an annual growth rate of 30%. NIO, meanwhile, is expected to see its revenue explode upwards from $5.4 billion to $12.8 billion between 2021 and 2023, for an annual growth rate of 54%. NIO is thus expected to grow way faster than Tesla over the next two years, on a relative basis. This shouldn't be a surprise, to be honest, as the law of large numbers dictates that maintaining massive growth rates becomes increasingly hard for a company the bigger it gets, and Tesla seems to have hit that point by now -- adding 50%+ a year to its top line will not be possible forever. This isn't even necessarily Tesla's fault, in fact, many high-quality growth companies have experienced the same. But investors should still consider this important fact -- Tesla's growth in coming years will be less exciting compared to what we have seen in the past, and peers, such as NIO, are growing faster.\nThe same holds true when we take a longer-term view. Revenue estimates for 2025 rest at$22.6 billionfor NIO, up another 80% from the 2023 estimate, and up 320% from what analysts are forecasting for 2021. Tesla, meanwhile, is forecasted to generate revenues of $122.5 billion in 2025 -- a large number, but up by a comparatively weak 48% from 2023, and up by a total of 150% versus 2021. Between 2021 and 2025, NIO will thus 4x its revenue, while Tesla will 2.5x its revenue in the same time span -- a meaningful difference that should, all else equal, allow for a premium valuation for NIO, in the same way Tesla deserves a premium valuation versus legacy players such as Volkswagen (OTCPK:VWAGY).\nLooking at revenue estimates for 2025 relative to how the two companies are valued today, we see that NIO trades at 3.2x 2025 sales, while the 2025 sales multiple for Tesla is 5.2. For a long-term oriented investor, NIO thus seems like the better value today, thanks to the fact that it is trading at a significantly lower sales multiple when we take a look into the future. This does not necessarily mean that NIO is cheap, however, as even a 3.2x 2025 sales multiple is relatively high compared to how legacy auto companies are valued. NIO is looking less expensive than Tesla, however, even if its shares are not cheap on an absolute basis.\nCan NIO Be Worth As Much As Tesla?\nThe answer to that depends on what time frame you are looking at. Today, NIO is significantly smaller than Tesla and thus rightfully trades at a way smaller market cap. It should also be noted that there is no guarantee that Tesla's shares are a great example of how an EV company should be valued -- it is, at least, possible that its shares are significantly overpriced today, I personally believe that as well (Note that some will argue that shares are underpriced, which is also among the possibilities, although I do not hold that belief personally).\nWhen we do, for a moment, assume that Tesla is correctly valued today and that EV companies do deserve a market cap in the $600 billion range when they sell about 800,000 vehicles a year, then NIO could eventually hit that as well, although not in the near term. NIO will sell about 90,000 vehicles this year, and that amount should grow to about 400,000 in 2025. If NIO were to grow its sales by 15% a year beyond that point, it could sell around 800,000 cars in 2030, or 9 years from now. If one wants to assume faster growth, the 800,000 vehicles a year line could also be crossed before 2030, e.g. in 2028 or 2029. If we do go with 2030 for now, then NIO could, at a similar deliveries-to-market capitalization ratio to Tesla, be valued at $600+ billion in 2030. In other words, NIO could be worth as much as Tesla (today) in nine years, when we assume that current growth projections are realistic and that a Tesla-like valuation is appropriate. Those are two major ifs, of course, and especially the second point is far from certain, I believe. I personally would not be too surprised to see Tesla's valuation compress, and thus NIO could trade well below the $600 billion market cap level in 2030, even if it continues to grow meaningfully. It is also possible that NIO's growth disappoints and that current projections are too bullish, although I think that NIO is well-positioned for growth thanks to its unique BaaS model and its strong brand that is especially well-recognized in its home market.\nIt should also be noted that Tesla's market cap in 2030 could be very different from $600 billion, thus even in case NIO hits that level, it is not at all guaranteed that the two companies will have a similar market cap. Tesla might be valued at a way higher valuation by then, e.g. if the ARK model is right (something I personally think is unlikely). To answer the above question, one could thus say that NIO might be worth hundreds of billions of dollars, like Tesla, in 8-10 years, but that is not at all guaranteed. And even if that were to happen, Tesla might be worth significantly more by then.\nIs NIO A Good Stock To Buy Or Sell Now?\nWhen considering NIO as an investment, it doesn't really matter all that much whether it will become as large or highly valued as Tesla eventually. Instead, investors should ask themselves what total returns they can expect over the next couple of years, and whether those expected returns are high enough relative to the risks in NIO's business model. Regarding those risks, one should mention the fact that the company isn't profitable yet, which means that NIO is dependent on cash on its balance sheet for growth investments. On top of that, competition in the EV space is growing, and market share battles could pressure margins in coming years, although NIO seems relatively well-positioned thanks to its battery-swapping, which is, I believe, a strong USP. Last but not least, the company's dependence on its home market China is a potential risk that should be kept in mind, although it should also be noted that, for now, it seems like the Chinese government is very accommodating to Chinese EV companies.\nOne could argue that valuations across the whole EV industry are too high, relative to how legacy auto companies are valued. Even those legacy players with attractive EV offerings such as Volkswagen or Ford trade at huge discounts compared to EV pureplays. But if one wants to invest in an EV pureplay, NIO doesn't seem like a bad choice. The company combines a strong brand, a unique BaaS offering, high growth rates, and shares trade at a discount compared to how the EV king Tesla is valued. At a little above 3x 2025 revenue, NIO does not seem overly expensive relative to other EV pureplays, although this still represents a premium versus legacy players, of course. If NIO manages to execute well and continues to roll out new models that are well-received by consumers, its shares could have significant upside potential in the long run. If EV stocks ever become an out-of-favor investment, NIO stock also could have considerable downside, however, this thus is not a low-risk pick. Depending on your risk tolerance, NIO could still be of value if you want a high-growth EV pureplay.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":149,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":171559899,"gmtCreate":1626751828011,"gmtModify":1703764513915,"author":{"id":"3576444918223783","authorId":"3576444918223783","name":"Damien Khoo","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/f08d9f6bdc3c0038e9aa81591b4df363","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576444918223783","authorIdStr":"3576444918223783"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"This explains why the vaccine stocks are ???","listText":"This explains why the vaccine stocks are ???","text":"This explains why the vaccine stocks are ???","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/171559899","repostId":"2152652683","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":151,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":146378974,"gmtCreate":1626056080198,"gmtModify":1703752471333,"author":{"id":"3576444918223783","authorId":"3576444918223783","name":"Damien Khoo","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/f08d9f6bdc3c0038e9aa81591b4df363","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576444918223783","authorIdStr":"3576444918223783"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like","listText":"Like","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":8,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/146378974","repostId":"1114863871","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1114863871","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1626039626,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1114863871?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-12 05:40","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Chase, Delta, Goldman Sachs, PepsiCo, and Other Stocks to Watch This Week","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1114863871","media":"Barron's","summary":"Second-quarter earnings season gets under way this week, with several big banks reporting. JPMorgan ChaseandGoldman SachsGroup kick things off on Tuesday, followed byBank of America,Wells Fargo,andCitigroupon Wednesday andMorgan Stanleyon Thursday.The week’s economic calendar will be equally busy. The Bureau of Labor Statistics releases the consumer price index for June on Tuesday, followed by the producer price index for June on Wednesday. Expectations are for year-over-year increases of 4.0% a","content":"<p>Second-quarter earnings season gets under way&nbsp;this week, with several big banks reporting.&nbsp;JPMorgan ChaseandGoldman SachsGroup kick things off on Tuesday, followed byBank of America,Wells Fargo,andCitigroupon Wednesday andMorgan Stanleyon Thursday.</p>\n<p>Other major companies reporting this week includePepsiCoandFastenalon Tuesday,Delta Air Lineson Wednesday,Taiwan Semiconductor ManufacturingandUnitedHealth Groupon Thursday, andKansas City Southernon Friday.</p>\n<p>The week’s economic calendar will be equally busy. The Bureau of Labor Statistics releases the consumer price index for June on Tuesday,&nbsp;followed by the producer price index for June on Wednesday. Expectations are for year-over-year increases of 4.0% and 6.4%, respectively, in the core CPI and core PPI.</p>\n<p>Investors and economists will also get a look at a pair of sentiment surveys this week:&nbsp;The National Federation of Independent Business’ Small Business Optimism Index for June on Tuesday and The University of Michigan’s Consumer Sentiment index for July on Friday. The&nbsp;Federal Reserve releases its latest beige book on Wednesday, the Census Bureau reports retail-sales data for June on Friday, and theBank of Japanannounces its latest monetary-policy decision on Friday.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1508a89eaa3fb959feaaa832797a2c48\" tg-width=\"1176\" tg-height=\"360\"></p>\n<p><b>Monday 7/12</b></p>\n<p>FedExhosts a conference call to update the investment community on its business outlook.</p>\n<p><b>Tuesday 7/13</b></p>\n<p>JPMorgan Chase and Goldman Sachs Group kick off earnings season by reporting results before the market open. The two money-center banks recently lifted their dividends 11% and 60%, respectively.</p>\n<p>Conagra Brands,Fastenal,First Republic Bank,and PepsiCo report quarterly results.</p>\n<p>Dell Technologieshosts a conference call to discuss its ESG strategy.</p>\n<p><b>The Bureau of Labor</b>&nbsp;Statistics releases the consumer price index for June. Economists forecast a 4.9% year-over-year rise, after a 5% jump in May—the fastest rate of growth since August 2008. The core CPI, which excludes volatile food and energy prices, is expected to increase 4% compared with 3.8% previously.</p>\n<p><b>The National Federation</b>&nbsp;of Independent Business releases its Small Business Optimism Index for June. Consensus estimate is for a 99.5 reading, about even with the May figure.</p>\n<p><b>Wednesday 7/14</b></p>\n<p>Bank of America,BlackRock,Citigroup, Delta Air Lines,PNC Financial Services Group,and Wells Fargo release earnings.</p>\n<p><b>The Federal Reserve</b>&nbsp;releases the beige book for the fifth of eight times this year. The report gathers anecdotal evidence of current economic conditions in the 12 Federal Reserve districts.</p>\n<p><b>The BLS releases</b>&nbsp;the producer price index for June. Expectations are for both the PPI and core PPI to increase 0.5% month over month. This compares with gains of 0.8% and 0.7%, respectively, in May.</p>\n<p><b>Thursday 7/15</b></p>\n<p>Bank of New York Mellon,Cintas,Morgan Stanley, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing,Truist Financial,U.S. Bancorp,and UnitedHealth Group hold conference calls to discuss quarterly results.</p>\n<p><b>Friday 7/16</b></p>\n<p>Charles Schwab,Ericsson,Kansas City Southern, andState Streetannounce earnings.</p>\n<p><b>The Bank of Japan</b>&nbsp;announces its monetary-policy decision. The central bank is widely expected to keep its key short-term interest rate unchanged at negative 0.1%. In June, the BOJ said it would launch a climate-change plan by the end of this year, and would release a preliminary plan at its July meeting. This could take the form of higher interest rates paid to banks for green-lending measures.</p>\n<p><b>The University of Michigan</b>&nbsp;releases its Consumer Sentiment index for July. Economists forecast an 86.5 reading, slightly higher than June’s 85.5. The index is still well below its levels from just prior to the pandemic.</p>\n<p><b>The Census Bureau</b>&nbsp;reports retail-sales data for June. Consensus estimate is for a 0.5% monthly decline in spending to $617 billion, after slumping 1.3% in May.</p>","source":"lsy1610680873436","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Chase, Delta, Goldman Sachs, PepsiCo, and Other Stocks to Watch This Week</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nChase, Delta, Goldman Sachs, PepsiCo, and Other Stocks to Watch This Week\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-12 05:40 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.barrons.com/articles/stocks-for-investors-to-watch-this-week-51625883421><strong>Barron's</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Second-quarter earnings season gets under way this week, with several big banks reporting. JPMorgan ChaseandGoldman SachsGroup kick things off on Tuesday, followed byBank of America,Wells Fargo,...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/stocks-for-investors-to-watch-this-week-51625883421\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"MS":"摩根士丹利","WFC":"富国银行","JPM":"摩根大通","BAC":"美国银行","TSM":"台积电","C":"花旗","GS":"高盛"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/stocks-for-investors-to-watch-this-week-51625883421","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1114863871","content_text":"Second-quarter earnings season gets under way this week, with several big banks reporting. JPMorgan ChaseandGoldman SachsGroup kick things off on Tuesday, followed byBank of America,Wells Fargo,andCitigroupon Wednesday andMorgan Stanleyon Thursday.\nOther major companies reporting this week includePepsiCoandFastenalon Tuesday,Delta Air Lineson Wednesday,Taiwan Semiconductor ManufacturingandUnitedHealth Groupon Thursday, andKansas City Southernon Friday.\nThe week’s economic calendar will be equally busy. The Bureau of Labor Statistics releases the consumer price index for June on Tuesday, followed by the producer price index for June on Wednesday. Expectations are for year-over-year increases of 4.0% and 6.4%, respectively, in the core CPI and core PPI.\nInvestors and economists will also get a look at a pair of sentiment surveys this week: The National Federation of Independent Business’ Small Business Optimism Index for June on Tuesday and The University of Michigan’s Consumer Sentiment index for July on Friday. The Federal Reserve releases its latest beige book on Wednesday, the Census Bureau reports retail-sales data for June on Friday, and theBank of Japanannounces its latest monetary-policy decision on Friday.\n\nMonday 7/12\nFedExhosts a conference call to update the investment community on its business outlook.\nTuesday 7/13\nJPMorgan Chase and Goldman Sachs Group kick off earnings season by reporting results before the market open. The two money-center banks recently lifted their dividends 11% and 60%, respectively.\nConagra Brands,Fastenal,First Republic Bank,and PepsiCo report quarterly results.\nDell Technologieshosts a conference call to discuss its ESG strategy.\nThe Bureau of Labor Statistics releases the consumer price index for June. Economists forecast a 4.9% year-over-year rise, after a 5% jump in May—the fastest rate of growth since August 2008. The core CPI, which excludes volatile food and energy prices, is expected to increase 4% compared with 3.8% previously.\nThe National Federation of Independent Business releases its Small Business Optimism Index for June. Consensus estimate is for a 99.5 reading, about even with the May figure.\nWednesday 7/14\nBank of America,BlackRock,Citigroup, Delta Air Lines,PNC Financial Services Group,and Wells Fargo release earnings.\nThe Federal Reserve releases the beige book for the fifth of eight times this year. The report gathers anecdotal evidence of current economic conditions in the 12 Federal Reserve districts.\nThe BLS releases the producer price index for June. Expectations are for both the PPI and core PPI to increase 0.5% month over month. This compares with gains of 0.8% and 0.7%, respectively, in May.\nThursday 7/15\nBank of New York Mellon,Cintas,Morgan Stanley, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing,Truist Financial,U.S. Bancorp,and UnitedHealth Group hold conference calls to discuss quarterly results.\nFriday 7/16\nCharles Schwab,Ericsson,Kansas City Southern, andState Streetannounce earnings.\nThe Bank of Japan announces its monetary-policy decision. The central bank is widely expected to keep its key short-term interest rate unchanged at negative 0.1%. In June, the BOJ said it would launch a climate-change plan by the end of this year, and would release a preliminary plan at its July meeting. This could take the form of higher interest rates paid to banks for green-lending measures.\nThe University of Michigan releases its Consumer Sentiment index for July. Economists forecast an 86.5 reading, slightly higher than June’s 85.5. The index is still well below its levels from just prior to the pandemic.\nThe Census Bureau reports retail-sales data for June. Consensus estimate is for a 0.5% monthly decline in spending to $617 billion, after slumping 1.3% in May.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":63,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9030637073,"gmtCreate":1645705554453,"gmtModify":1676534055435,"author":{"id":"3576444918223783","authorId":"3576444918223783","name":"Damien Khoo","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/f08d9f6bdc3c0038e9aa81591b4df363","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576444918223783","authorIdStr":"3576444918223783"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Buy high sell low&nbsp;","listText":"Buy high sell low&nbsp;","text":"Buy high sell low","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":9,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9030637073","repostId":"1161679469","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":509,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":885656629,"gmtCreate":1631790007861,"gmtModify":1676530636133,"author":{"id":"3576444918223783","authorId":"3576444918223783","name":"Damien Khoo","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/f08d9f6bdc3c0038e9aa81591b4df363","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576444918223783","authorIdStr":"3576444918223783"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Apple. Because Micro…soft","listText":"Apple. Because Micro…soft","text":"Apple. Because Micro…soft","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/885656629","repostId":"1126607843","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1126607843","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1631785252,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1126607843?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-09-16 17:40","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Vs. Microsoft: Who Is Inclined To Fall Harder In Case Of Correction","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1126607843","media":"seekingalpha","summary":"Summary\n\nObjectively, the likelihood of a significant correction in the stock market now deserves at","content":"<p><b>Summary</b></p>\n<ul>\n <li>Objectively, the likelihood of a significant correction in the stock market now deserves attention.</li>\n <li>In the recent past, Apple and Microsoft have responded differently to a significant decline in the stock market.</li>\n <li>Apple and&nbsp;Microsoft tend to be undervalued in terms of future cash flow, and overvalued in terms of potential dividends.</li>\n <li>In the event of a hypothetical correction, Microsoft's potential for falling is lower than Apple's.</li>\n</ul>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a07b4e98bb726c0044932fc29b3089b3\" tg-width=\"1536\" tg-height=\"1208\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>vicnt/iStock via Getty Images</span></p>\n<p><b>As an introduction...</b></p>\n<p>Since the last major correction in the US stock market ended in March 2020, the Nasdaq index has risen nearly 170%:</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/05a849f8e9ddf15f484770a5f0227fcd\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"371\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Data by YCharts</span></p>\n<p>For a year and a half, this is a very strong result, considering that the average annual total price return of the index over the past decade does not exceed 20%.<i>This fact alone makes us estimate the likelihood of a new significant correction in the stock market higher.</i></p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/37eb0178d9d463c7419b99632a6ec614\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"396\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Source: VisualizedAnalytics</span></p>\n<p>In addition, there are other factors that make us wary of the current price level of the market.</p>\n<p>First, this year there is a record inflow of liquidity to the stock market. I'm not talking about the reasons now, they are obvious. But this fact alone makes the market extremely volatile:</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/10623d7cecd8dec70bb229b809458b68\" tg-width=\"1242\" tg-height=\"918\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Source: Bank of America</span></p>\n<p>Second, the relative size of the US stock market has exceeded 200% of nominal GDP. In principle, this is not a fundamental limit. But it was the ultra-soft monetary policy that allowed the US stock market to reach its current record level. And most likely, in this context, a reversal is&nbsp;already outlined.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f69cd6450737ddf3e5fcbd6406c793ba\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"396\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Source: VisualizedAnalytics</span></p>\n<p>And finally the third. The macrocycle also allows us to expect the market to enter a phase of increased volatility and tightening of monetary policy:</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1d6a6a794dde6f4e1d3e6e9149b55060\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"396\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Source: VisualizedAnalytics</span></p>\n<p>So, objectively, the likelihood of the next correction of the stock market at least deserves attention. And in this context, I propose to answer the question:<i>in case of a correction, which company is inclined to fall harder - Apple (AAPL) or Microsoft (MSFT)?</i></p>\n<p><b>Why Apple vs. Microsoft?</b></p>\n<p>The decision to compare exactly these two companies was dictated by two factors.</p>\n<p>Firstly, these are the two largest companies in the tech sector, together accounting for more than 10% of the total capitalization of the US stock market. These companies are so large that, in principle, their dynamics alone can cause a new wave of correction:</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cf3ef401b67c298ecbd9d56d31fc6927\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"396\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/31417d34d6eacb724c20b3a274068467\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"396\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Source: VisualizedAnalytics</span></p>\n<p>Secondly, both companies pay dividends. In matters of fundamental valuation, this factor plays a significant role.</p>\n<p><b>Some Statistics</b></p>\n<p>To begin with, let's take a look at what price dynamics both companies have shown during strong market fluctuations in the recent past.</p>\n<p>To do this, I have broken the three-year span into eight periods of market movement:</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/edfd9dec91d94990cf5217aa649758ac\" tg-width=\"947\" tg-height=\"578\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Source: TradingView, Author</span></p>\n<p>Here are the results that companies have shown in each of the periods:</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/868067f19c2251bfdb0658a251596fcc\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"214\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Source: Author</span></p>\n<p>At first glance, the statistics are unambiguous:<i>during periods of correction, the price of Microsoft tends to decrease less than that of Apple.</i>But on the other hand, Apple has consistently performed better during periods of market growth. And in this case, the result obtained can simply be explained by the technical factors of the market behavior.</p>\n<p>But in the current period of growth, both companies demonstrate approximately the same return. And therefore, here we do not find a clue to our question...</p>\n<p><b>Fundamentals</b></p>\n<p>Exclusively in an investment context, the price of a company's share can be viewed from two points of view.</p>\n<p>On the one hand, the price reflects the present value of the company's&nbsp;<b>future cash flow</b>. On the other hand, the price is the present value of the sum of&nbsp;<b>all potential dividends</b>that the company will pay in the future. Let's model these prices for Apple and Microsoft. And for this I will build, respectively, the Discounted Cash Flow Model and the Dividend Discount Model.</p>\n<p>In order for the models to be less subjective, I will take as a basis the average expectations of analysts regarding the revenue and EPS of the companies in the next decade.</p>\n<p>Let's start with&nbsp;<b>Apple</b>. Here is the calculation of the Weighted Average Cost of Capital:</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2f8fc4e5dc7025dd1227ea5279073aa5\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"396\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Source: Author</span></p>\n<p>Notes:</p>\n<ul>\n <li>In order to calculate the market rate of return, I used values of equityriskpremium (4.72%) and the current yield of UST10 as a risk-free rate (1.33%).</li>\n <li>I used the current&nbsp;value&nbsp;of the three-year beta coefficient. For a terminal year, I used Beta equal to 1.</li>\n <li>To calculate the Cost of Debt, I used the interest expense for 2020 divided by the average debt in 2019 and 2018.</li>\n</ul>\n<p>Here is the DCF model:</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9bfb45a9125bb1f465cd34a6a8a6d06a\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"520\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Source: Author</span></p>\n<p><b>The DCF-based target price for Apple's shares is about $181 (+22%).</b></p>\n<p>In the case of Apple, when building the Dividend Discount Model it is also necessary to take into account the fact that the company continues to actively buy back:</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d84076d0fc1bb5dbec8c1e6e19434153\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"371\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Data by YCharts</span></p>\n<p>Continuing the current dynamics, the model assumes that by the terminal year the number of diluted shares will be reduced to 13.5 billion.</p>\n<p>Apple spends an average of 25% of its net income on dividends. I assume that the payout ratio will remain at this level.</p>\n<p>Here is the Dividend Discount Model itself:</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b8990a8299cc0652d77815710f0ab427\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"292\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Source: Author</span></p>\n<p><b><i>The DDM-based target price for Apple's shares is $69 (-54%).</i></b></p>\n<p>Now let's take a look at Microsoft.</p>\n<p>Here is the calculation of the WACC:</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/15889e90904c69497b749f28bd64190f\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"396\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Source: Author</span></p>\n<p>And here is the DCF model:</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7dca7339e43f534807bf043b1931e1db\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"506\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Source: Author</span></p>\n<p><b>The DCF-based target price for Microsoft's shares is about $353 (+18%).</b></p>\n<p>Microsoft is also actively buying back shares:</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1deec463f584b5eb7913d72938d3e1ca\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"371\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Data by YCharts</span></p>\n<p>I proceed from the assumption that the dynamics of the last two years will continue, and by the terminal year, the number of diluted shares will be reduced to 7.2 billion.</p>\n<p>Here is the Dividend Discount Model:</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/18c863b92e948f78e518d5619b44647d\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"283\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Source: Author</span></p>\n<p><b><i>The DDM-based target price for Microsoft's shares is $203 (-32%).</i></b></p>\n<p>Let's summarize:</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/84b527d82270843e021a89a9ecdf68e6\" tg-width=\"906\" tg-height=\"212\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p>\n<p>It is worth noting that I have already been observing similar results in the case of these companies for a long time. I mean, Apple and Microsoft tend to be undervalued in terms of future cash flow, and overvalued in terms of potential dividends.</p>\n<p>This suggests that during periods of market growth, investors are not particularly inclined to pay attention to dividends. Moreover, most likely dividends are perceived simply as a bonus.</p>\n<p>But during periods of market correction, the present value of potential dividends is the minimum level below which it is difficult for the price to fall. And in this context, I think Microsoft is in a better position than Apple.</p>\n<p><b>Bottom line</b></p>\n<p>At the current stage of the market cycle, when the likelihood of a correction has gone beyond formal, in my opinion, investing in Microsoft is less risky compared to Apple.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Vs. Microsoft: Who Is Inclined To Fall Harder In Case Of Correction</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Vs. Microsoft: Who Is Inclined To Fall Harder In Case Of Correction\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-09-16 17:40 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4455478-apple-stock-vs-microsoft-stock-who-is-inclined-to-fall-harder-in-case-of-correction><strong>seekingalpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Summary\n\nObjectively, the likelihood of a significant correction in the stock market now deserves attention.\nIn the recent past, Apple and Microsoft have responded differently to a significant decline...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4455478-apple-stock-vs-microsoft-stock-who-is-inclined-to-fall-harder-in-case-of-correction\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果","MSFT":"微软"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4455478-apple-stock-vs-microsoft-stock-who-is-inclined-to-fall-harder-in-case-of-correction","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1126607843","content_text":"Summary\n\nObjectively, the likelihood of a significant correction in the stock market now deserves attention.\nIn the recent past, Apple and Microsoft have responded differently to a significant decline in the stock market.\nApple and Microsoft tend to be undervalued in terms of future cash flow, and overvalued in terms of potential dividends.\nIn the event of a hypothetical correction, Microsoft's potential for falling is lower than Apple's.\n\nvicnt/iStock via Getty Images\nAs an introduction...\nSince the last major correction in the US stock market ended in March 2020, the Nasdaq index has risen nearly 170%:\nData by YCharts\nFor a year and a half, this is a very strong result, considering that the average annual total price return of the index over the past decade does not exceed 20%.This fact alone makes us estimate the likelihood of a new significant correction in the stock market higher.\nSource: VisualizedAnalytics\nIn addition, there are other factors that make us wary of the current price level of the market.\nFirst, this year there is a record inflow of liquidity to the stock market. I'm not talking about the reasons now, they are obvious. But this fact alone makes the market extremely volatile:\nSource: Bank of America\nSecond, the relative size of the US stock market has exceeded 200% of nominal GDP. In principle, this is not a fundamental limit. But it was the ultra-soft monetary policy that allowed the US stock market to reach its current record level. And most likely, in this context, a reversal is already outlined.\nSource: VisualizedAnalytics\nAnd finally the third. The macrocycle also allows us to expect the market to enter a phase of increased volatility and tightening of monetary policy:\nSource: VisualizedAnalytics\nSo, objectively, the likelihood of the next correction of the stock market at least deserves attention. And in this context, I propose to answer the question:in case of a correction, which company is inclined to fall harder - Apple (AAPL) or Microsoft (MSFT)?\nWhy Apple vs. Microsoft?\nThe decision to compare exactly these two companies was dictated by two factors.\nFirstly, these are the two largest companies in the tech sector, together accounting for more than 10% of the total capitalization of the US stock market. These companies are so large that, in principle, their dynamics alone can cause a new wave of correction:\n\nSource: VisualizedAnalytics\nSecondly, both companies pay dividends. In matters of fundamental valuation, this factor plays a significant role.\nSome Statistics\nTo begin with, let's take a look at what price dynamics both companies have shown during strong market fluctuations in the recent past.\nTo do this, I have broken the three-year span into eight periods of market movement:\nSource: TradingView, Author\nHere are the results that companies have shown in each of the periods:\nSource: Author\nAt first glance, the statistics are unambiguous:during periods of correction, the price of Microsoft tends to decrease less than that of Apple.But on the other hand, Apple has consistently performed better during periods of market growth. And in this case, the result obtained can simply be explained by the technical factors of the market behavior.\nBut in the current period of growth, both companies demonstrate approximately the same return. And therefore, here we do not find a clue to our question...\nFundamentals\nExclusively in an investment context, the price of a company's share can be viewed from two points of view.\nOn the one hand, the price reflects the present value of the company's future cash flow. On the other hand, the price is the present value of the sum of all potential dividendsthat the company will pay in the future. Let's model these prices for Apple and Microsoft. And for this I will build, respectively, the Discounted Cash Flow Model and the Dividend Discount Model.\nIn order for the models to be less subjective, I will take as a basis the average expectations of analysts regarding the revenue and EPS of the companies in the next decade.\nLet's start with Apple. Here is the calculation of the Weighted Average Cost of Capital:\nSource: Author\nNotes:\n\nIn order to calculate the market rate of return, I used values of equityriskpremium (4.72%) and the current yield of UST10 as a risk-free rate (1.33%).\nI used the current value of the three-year beta coefficient. For a terminal year, I used Beta equal to 1.\nTo calculate the Cost of Debt, I used the interest expense for 2020 divided by the average debt in 2019 and 2018.\n\nHere is the DCF model:\nSource: Author\nThe DCF-based target price for Apple's shares is about $181 (+22%).\nIn the case of Apple, when building the Dividend Discount Model it is also necessary to take into account the fact that the company continues to actively buy back:\nData by YCharts\nContinuing the current dynamics, the model assumes that by the terminal year the number of diluted shares will be reduced to 13.5 billion.\nApple spends an average of 25% of its net income on dividends. I assume that the payout ratio will remain at this level.\nHere is the Dividend Discount Model itself:\nSource: Author\nThe DDM-based target price for Apple's shares is $69 (-54%).\nNow let's take a look at Microsoft.\nHere is the calculation of the WACC:\nSource: Author\nAnd here is the DCF model:\nSource: Author\nThe DCF-based target price for Microsoft's shares is about $353 (+18%).\nMicrosoft is also actively buying back shares:\nData by YCharts\nI proceed from the assumption that the dynamics of the last two years will continue, and by the terminal year, the number of diluted shares will be reduced to 7.2 billion.\nHere is the Dividend Discount Model:\nSource: Author\nThe DDM-based target price for Microsoft's shares is $203 (-32%).\nLet's summarize:\n\nIt is worth noting that I have already been observing similar results in the case of these companies for a long time. I mean, Apple and Microsoft tend to be undervalued in terms of future cash flow, and overvalued in terms of potential dividends.\nThis suggests that during periods of market growth, investors are not particularly inclined to pay attention to dividends. Moreover, most likely dividends are perceived simply as a bonus.\nBut during periods of market correction, the present value of potential dividends is the minimum level below which it is difficult for the price to fall. And in this context, I think Microsoft is in a better position than Apple.\nBottom line\nAt the current stage of the market cycle, when the likelihood of a correction has gone beyond formal, in my opinion, investing in Microsoft is less risky compared to Apple.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":89,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":815749764,"gmtCreate":1630722201758,"gmtModify":1676530384604,"author":{"id":"3576444918223783","authorId":"3576444918223783","name":"Damien Khoo","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/f08d9f6bdc3c0038e9aa81591b4df363","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576444918223783","authorIdStr":"3576444918223783"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Momentum has slowed.&nbsp;It’s timely for a correction or pullback so new buyers can enter.&nbsp;","listText":"Momentum has slowed.&nbsp;It’s timely for a correction or pullback so new buyers can enter.&nbsp;","text":"Momentum has slowed. It’s timely for a correction or pullback so new buyers can enter.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/815749764","repostId":"1186003479","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":274,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":832552590,"gmtCreate":1629672245210,"gmtModify":1676530087595,"author":{"id":"3576444918223783","authorId":"3576444918223783","name":"Damien Khoo","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/f08d9f6bdc3c0038e9aa81591b4df363","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576444918223783","authorIdStr":"3576444918223783"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"I’m thinking of closing my non performing stocks and adding BABA too","listText":"I’m thinking of closing my non performing stocks and adding BABA too","text":"I’m thinking of closing my non performing stocks and adding BABA too","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/832552590","repostId":"1133515985","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":166,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":175063529,"gmtCreate":1626998908061,"gmtModify":1703482048822,"author":{"id":"3576444918223783","authorId":"3576444918223783","name":"Damien Khoo","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/f08d9f6bdc3c0038e9aa81591b4df363","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576444918223783","authorIdStr":"3576444918223783"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"I personally think this is short term. If your time horizon is 1 to 2 years. Should buy the dip.&nbsp;","listText":"I personally think this is short term. If your time horizon is 1 to 2 years. Should buy the dip.&nbsp;","text":"I personally think this is short term. If your time horizon is 1 to 2 years. Should buy the dip.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/175063529","repostId":"1139354130","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1139354130","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1626962203,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1139354130?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-22 21:56","market":"other","language":"en","title":"Bilibili fell over 5% in morning trading","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1139354130","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"(July 22) Bilibili Inc. fell over 5% in morning trading.","content":"<p>(July 22)&nbsp;<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BILI\">Bilibili Inc.</a> fell over 5% in morning trading.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f2f2967080636503f5d7b0d41cc6698f\" tg-width=\"704\" tg-height=\"486\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Bilibili fell over 5% in morning trading</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBilibili fell over 5% in morning trading\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-07-22 21:56</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>(July 22)&nbsp;<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BILI\">Bilibili Inc.</a> fell over 5% in morning trading.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f2f2967080636503f5d7b0d41cc6698f\" tg-width=\"704\" tg-height=\"486\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BILI":"哔哩哔哩","09626":"哔哩哔哩-W"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1139354130","content_text":"(July 22) Bilibili Inc. fell over 5% in morning trading.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":41,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}