文氏 personal page - To The Moon

文氏

No personal profile

31Follow

2Followers

0Topic

0Badge

2021-05-14

Stuck

The Last Two Times This Hit, Stocks Dropped 20% and 50%, Respectively

2021-05-14

Informative read

Why everyone from Elon Musk to Janet Yellen is worried about bitcoin’s energy usage

2021-05-12

Red.....

Stocks take a hit as trading opens Wednesday, spooked by inflation data

2021-05-11

Oh mannnn..worrying

U.S. stocks slump at Tuesday's open as inflation fears continue to buffett tech stocks

2021-05-05

Not surprising

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2021-05-05

Omg

"It Could Get Weird": Stocks Puke As "Extreme" Negative Gamma Strikes

2021-05-04

I'm not so sure

3 Stocks to Buy When the Next Market Crash Comes

2021-05-04

Covid was no where near over but people forgot that ..

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2021-05-04

Ahhh..

Opinion: Why you should worry about the flood of new cash into U.S. stock funds

2021-04-30

Yes!

NIO rose more than 5%, after falling nearly 4% before

2021-04-28

Hmmm food for thought

5 Ultra-Popular Growth Stocks With 28% to 56% Upside, According to Wall Street

2021-04-27

Upupup

What's The Real Story Of Tesla In China?

2021-04-26

When should I buy? Issit too late now????

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2021-04-22

Ohhh good explanation

3 EV Stocks That Are At Important Support Levels And Could Rebound

2021-04-21

Didn't manage to sell in time =(

Netflix shares tumbled more than 8% in premarket trading

2021-04-14

Slightly confusing how this works!

5 things to watch out for before you invest in SPACs

2021-04-08

$Spotify Technology S.A.(SPOT)$went in too early, before the adjustments..=(

2021-04-07

Yay!

GameStop's Brilliant First Step

2021-04-06

Interesting

Better Buy: Spotify vs. AT&T

2021-04-06

$Tesla Motors(TSLA)$motoring please

Go to Tiger App to see more news

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"userPageInfo":{"id":3576837088119232,"uuid":"3576837088119232","gmtCreate":1613743291013,"gmtModify":1619000981432,"name":"文氏","pinyin":"wswenshi","introduction":"","introductionEn":null,"signature":"","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13ab58f27225c31b03dde6b684f98f7e","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":2,"headSize":31,"tweetSize":24,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":2,"name":"无畏虎","nameTw":"無畏虎","represent":"初生牛犊","factor":"发布3条非转发主帖,1条获得他人回复或点赞","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":"success","userBadges":[{"badgeId":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493-2","templateUuid":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493","name":"Senior Tiger","description":"Join the tiger community for 1000 days","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0063fb68ea29c9ae6858c58630e182d5","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/96c699a93be4214d4b49aea6a5a5d1a4","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/35b0e542a9ff77046ed69ef602bc105d","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84-1","templateUuid":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84","name":"Real Trader","description":"Completed a transaction","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100},{"badgeId":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be-1","templateUuid":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be","name":"Elite Trader","description":"Total number of securities or futures transactions reached 30","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ab0f87127c854ce3191a752d57b46edc","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c9835ce48b8c8743566d344ac7a7ba8c","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76754b53ce7a90019f132c1d2fbc698f","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":"60.37%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":3,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":null,"starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"post","tweets":[{"id":198319589,"gmtCreate":1620925209241,"gmtModify":1704350638598,"author":{"id":"3576837088119232","authorId":"3576837088119232","authorIdStr":"3576837088119232","name":"文氏","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13ab58f27225c31b03dde6b684f98f7e","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576837088119232"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Stuck","listText":"Stuck","text":"Stuck","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/198319589","repostId":"1196862271","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1196862271","pubTimestamp":1620919313,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1196862271?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-05-13 23:21","market":"us","language":"en","title":"The Last Two Times This Hit, Stocks Dropped 20% and 50%, Respectively","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1196862271","media":"zerohedge","summary":"In our last article, I outlined how the rise in inflation has slammed Tech stocks lower.\nBy way of a","content":"<p>In our last article, I outlined how the rise in inflation has slammed Tech stocks lower.</p>\n<p>By way of a quick review, Tech, as represented by the NASDAQ is highly sensitive to inflation on an inverse relationship: when inflation rises, Tech stocks collapse and when inflation falls, Tech stocks erupt higher.</p>\n<p>The reason for this is that much of Tech investing is based on growth rates. And if bond yields rise as a result of inflation, bonds become more attractive as an investment, taking away from the appeal of Tech.</p>\n<p>As I noted yesterday. as inflation entered the financial system in 2020 and began to accelerate in 2021, Tech stocks have struggled. You can see this in the chart below (red rectangle).</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6366a605a86374ef9af9de07ae828fd4\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"606\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">So, we know that Tech is going to struggle going forward as inflation heats up. But what about the broader market like the S&amp;P 500? Will it collapse too?</p>\n<p>To figure that out, let’s take a look at the last two inflationary scares in the U.S.</p>\n<p>The most recent scare occurred in 2010-2011. At that time, the Fed was pretty quick on the uptake and decided to allow its QE 2 program (the cause of the inflationary spike) to end.</p>\n<p>The Fed then waited several months before introducing any new monetary programs. And when it did introduce one, it didn’t involve money printing (instead the Fed used the proceeds from Treasury sales to buy long-date Treasuries through a process called Operation Twist). This was a kind of stealth tightening.</p>\n<p>Stocks didn’t like this, collapsing nearly 20%.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1fdf95bc30276d330c4bd7a5f62b10d2\" tg-width=\"620\" tg-height=\"376\"></p>\n<p>Bear in mind, that was a relatively minor inflationary scare. During the last legitimate inflationary storm in the 1970s-1980s.</p>\n<p>During that mess, the Fed was forced to be MUCH more aggressive with its tightening, embarking on two aggressive tightening schedules. It’s worth noting that this triggered two SEVERE recessions (shaded areas).</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6f6ed1ada17beb2066d0017b576e64cc\" tg-width=\"1168\" tg-height=\"450\"></p>\n<p>This IMPLODED the stock market, resulting in a roughly 50% decline over the course of 18 months.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3b38c35b81a872044b03ce49014d5e46\" tg-width=\"620\" tg-height=\"376\"></p>\n<p>So, what will it be this time? Will the Fed engage in a stealth taper as was the case in 2011… or will it tighten monetary policy aggressively as it did in the 1970s and 1980s?</p>\n<p>We’ll address that in our next article.</p>\n<p>in the meantime, we just published a Special Investment Report concerning FIVE secret investments you can use to make inflation&nbsp;<b>pay you</b>&nbsp;as it rips through the financial system in the months ahead.</p>\n<p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>The Last Two Times This Hit, Stocks Dropped 20% and 50%, Respectively</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nThe Last Two Times This Hit, Stocks Dropped 20% and 50%, Respectively\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-05-13 23:21 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2021-05-13/last-two-times-hit-stocks-dropped-20-and-50-respectively><strong>zerohedge</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>In our last article, I outlined how the rise in inflation has slammed Tech stocks lower.\nBy way of a quick review, Tech, as represented by the NASDAQ is highly sensitive to inflation on an inverse ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2021-05-13/last-two-times-hit-stocks-dropped-20-and-50-respectively\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SPY":"标普500ETF",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2021-05-13/last-two-times-hit-stocks-dropped-20-and-50-respectively","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1196862271","content_text":"In our last article, I outlined how the rise in inflation has slammed Tech stocks lower.\nBy way of a quick review, Tech, as represented by the NASDAQ is highly sensitive to inflation on an inverse relationship: when inflation rises, Tech stocks collapse and when inflation falls, Tech stocks erupt higher.\nThe reason for this is that much of Tech investing is based on growth rates. And if bond yields rise as a result of inflation, bonds become more attractive as an investment, taking away from the appeal of Tech.\nAs I noted yesterday. as inflation entered the financial system in 2020 and began to accelerate in 2021, Tech stocks have struggled. You can see this in the chart below (red rectangle).\nSo, we know that Tech is going to struggle going forward as inflation heats up. But what about the broader market like the S&P 500? Will it collapse too?\nTo figure that out, let’s take a look at the last two inflationary scares in the U.S.\nThe most recent scare occurred in 2010-2011. At that time, the Fed was pretty quick on the uptake and decided to allow its QE 2 program (the cause of the inflationary spike) to end.\nThe Fed then waited several months before introducing any new monetary programs. And when it did introduce one, it didn’t involve money printing (instead the Fed used the proceeds from Treasury sales to buy long-date Treasuries through a process called Operation Twist). This was a kind of stealth tightening.\nStocks didn’t like this, collapsing nearly 20%.\n\nBear in mind, that was a relatively minor inflationary scare. During the last legitimate inflationary storm in the 1970s-1980s.\nDuring that mess, the Fed was forced to be MUCH more aggressive with its tightening, embarking on two aggressive tightening schedules. It’s worth noting that this triggered two SEVERE recessions (shaded areas).\n\nThis IMPLODED the stock market, resulting in a roughly 50% decline over the course of 18 months.\nSo, what will it be this time? Will the Fed engage in a stealth taper as was the case in 2011… or will it tighten monetary policy aggressively as it did in the 1970s and 1980s?\nWe’ll address that in our next article.\nin the meantime, we just published a Special Investment Report concerning FIVE secret investments you can use to make inflation pay you as it rips through the financial system in the months ahead.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":271,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":198310782,"gmtCreate":1620925137746,"gmtModify":1704350638110,"author":{"id":"3576837088119232","authorId":"3576837088119232","authorIdStr":"3576837088119232","name":"文氏","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13ab58f27225c31b03dde6b684f98f7e","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576837088119232"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Informative read","listText":"Informative read","text":"Informative read","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/198310782","repostId":"1116555518","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1116555518","pubTimestamp":1620913985,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1116555518?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-05-13 21:53","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why everyone from Elon Musk to Janet Yellen is worried about bitcoin’s energy usage","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1116555518","media":"cnbc","summary":"KEY POINTS\n\nElon Musk said Tesla had halted purchases of vehicles with bitcoin due to concerns over ","content":"<div>\n<p>KEY POINTS\n\nElon Musk said Tesla had halted purchases of vehicles with bitcoin due to concerns over the “rapidly increasing use of fossil fuels for bitcoin mining.”\nThe cryptocurrency uses more energy...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/05/13/why-elon-musk-is-worried-about-bitcoin-environmental-impact.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"cnbc_highlight","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why everyone from Elon Musk to Janet Yellen is worried about bitcoin’s energy usage</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy everyone from Elon Musk to Janet Yellen is worried about bitcoin’s energy usage\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-05-13 21:53 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.cnbc.com/2021/05/13/why-elon-musk-is-worried-about-bitcoin-environmental-impact.html><strong>cnbc</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>KEY POINTS\n\nElon Musk said Tesla had halted purchases of vehicles with bitcoin due to concerns over the “rapidly increasing use of fossil fuels for bitcoin mining.”\nThe cryptocurrency uses more energy...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/05/13/why-elon-musk-is-worried-about-bitcoin-environmental-impact.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"GBTC":"Grayscale Bitcoin Trust"},"source_url":"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/05/13/why-elon-musk-is-worried-about-bitcoin-environmental-impact.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/72bb72e1b84c09fca865c6dcb1bbcd16","article_id":"1116555518","content_text":"KEY POINTS\n\nElon Musk said Tesla had halted purchases of vehicles with bitcoin due to concerns over the “rapidly increasing use of fossil fuels for bitcoin mining.”\nThe cryptocurrency uses more energy than entire countries such as Sweden and Malaysia, according to researchers.\nTreasury Secretary Janet Yellen has also warned about bitcoin’s environmental impact, saying it uses a “staggering” amount of power.\n\nElon Musk’sdecision to stopTeslafrom acceptingbitcoinas payment has led to fresh scrutiny of the cryptocurrency’s environmental impact.\nMusksaid Wednesdaythat Tesla had halted purchases of its vehicles with bitcoin due to concerns over the “rapidly increasing use of fossil fuels for bitcoin mining.”\nHe alluded to data from researchers at Cambridge University which shows bitcoin’s electricity usage spiking this year.\nTesla won't sell its bitcoin — the automaker is sitting on$2.5 billion worthof the digital coin — and Musk said it intends to resume transactions with bitcoin once mining \"transitions to more sustainable energy.\"\n\"We are also looking at other cryptocurrencies that use <1% of Bitcoin's energy/transaction,\" Musk said.\nMusk's comments roiled cryptocurrency markets, which haveshed as much as $365.85 billion in valuesince his tweet.\nWhy is Musk worried?\nCritics ofbitcoinhave long been wary of its impact on the environment. The cryptocurrency uses more energy than entire countries such as Sweden and Malaysia, according to the Cambridge Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index.\nTo understand why bitcoin is so energy-intensive, you have to look at its underlying technology, the blockchain.\nBitcoin's public ledger is decentralized, meaning it isn't controlled by any single authority. It's constantly being updated by a network of computers around the world.\nSo-called miners run purpose-built computers to solve complex math puzzles in order to make a transaction go through. This is the only way to mint new bitcoins.\nMiners do not run this operation for free. They have to shell out huge sums on specialized equipment. A key incentive of bitcoin's model, known as \"proof of work,\" is the promise of being rewarded in some bitcoin if you manage to solve its complex hashing algorithm.\nIt's worth noting thatdogecoin, which has risen wildly in price lately on the back of support from Musk, also uses a proof-of-work mechanism.\nCarol Alexander, a professor at the University of Sussex Business School, explains that bitcoin's mining \"difficulty\" — a measure of the computational effort it takes to mine bitcoin — has been going \"up and up\" over the last three years.\n\"More and more electricity is being used,\" Alexander told CNBC. \"That means that the network difficulty will also be going up (and) more miners are coming in because the hash rate's going up.\"\nBitcoin's price is up almost 70% so far this year. As it goes up in price, the revenue to miners also increases, incentivizing more participants to mine the cryptocurrency.\nMeanwhile, Musk isn't the only one who's worried about the environmental impact of bitcoin. In February, Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen warned that the digital coin is \"extremely inefficient\" for making transactions and uses a \"staggering\" amount of power.\nDoes bitcoin actually harm the environment?\nIt's complicated. On the one hand, bitcoin's network uses anunfathomable amount of energy. Much of the mining of bitcoin is concentrated in China, whose economy is still heavily reliant on coal.\nLast month, a coal mine in the Xinjiang region flooded and shut down. This took nearly a quarter of bitcoin's hash rate — or computing power — offline, according to crypto industry publicationCoinDesk.\nIn March, China's Inner Mongolia region said it wouldshut down cryptocurrency mining operationsin the region due to concerns over energy consumption.\nOn the other side of the debate, bitcoin investors have attempted to push back on the narrative that it's harmful for the environment.\nWhile it's difficult to determine the energy mix that powers bitcoin, some in the crypto industry say miners are incentivized to use renewables as it's getting cheaper to produce them. In China, the province of Sichuan is known to attract miners due to its cheap electricity and rich hydropower resources.\nLast month,Jack Dorsey'sfintech companySquareand Cathie Wood's Ark Invest put out amemoclaiming that bitcoin will actually drive renewable energy innovation. However, critics said they had avested interestin doing so.\nAlexander said the debate around bitcoin's environmental impact was misguided as most transactions with the digital asset aren't happening on the blockchain.\n\"Almost all the trading is not done on the blockchain,\" she said. \"It's done on secondary markets, centralized exchanges. They're not even recorded on the blockchain.\"\nESG concerns\nRegardless of whether bitcoin is actually a polluter or not, the negative connotations around its energy consumption have worried investors conscious of companies' ethical and environmental responsibilities.\nESG, or environmental, social and corporate governance, has become agrowing trendin financial markets, with portfolio managers increasingly incorporating sustainable investments into their strategies.\nSome Tesla shareholders may be worried that the company is betting big on bitcoin while also claiming to be a green energy company.\n\"Bitcoin backers will be wondering where this leaves the future of the cryptocurrency,\" Laith Khalaf, a financial analyst at investment firm AJ Bell, said in a note Thursday.\n\"Environmental matters are an incredibly sensitive subject right now, and Tesla's move might serve as a wake-up call to businesses and consumers using Bitcoin, who hadn't hitherto considered its carbon footprint,\" Khalaf added.\n\"Tesla's decision certainly puts pressure on other big companies who accept Bitcoin to review their practices, because boardrooms will now be wary about getting it in the ear from ESG investors on the shareholder register.\"","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":278,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":191915440,"gmtCreate":1620833123680,"gmtModify":1704349136123,"author":{"id":"3576837088119232","authorId":"3576837088119232","authorIdStr":"3576837088119232","name":"文氏","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13ab58f27225c31b03dde6b684f98f7e","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576837088119232"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Red.....","listText":"Red.....","text":"Red.....","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/191915440","repostId":"1109603661","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1109603661","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1620826282,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1109603661?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-05-12 21:31","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Stocks take a hit as trading opens Wednesday, spooked by inflation data","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1109603661","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"(May 12) Stocks take a hit as trading opens Wednesday, spooked by inflation data. The Dow Jones Indu","content":"<p>(May 12)&nbsp;Stocks take a hit as trading opens Wednesday, spooked by inflation data.&nbsp;</p><p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell more than 150 points, following its worst day since February. The S&amp;P 500 lost 0.6%, while the tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite slid more than 1%.</p><p>Inflation acceleratedat its fastest pace since 2008 last month with the Consumer Price Index spiking 4.2% from a year ago, compared to the Dow Jones estimate for a 3.6% increase. The monthly gain was 0.8%, versus the expected 0.2%.</p><p>Excluding volatile food and energy prices, the core CPI increased 3% from the same period in 2020 and 0.9% on a monthly basis. The respective estimates were 2.3% and 0.3%.</p><p>“The markets have been hovering around all times highs with a lot of the reopening trade already priced in. So it’s not out of the question that the outsized inflation read could bring us back down to earth a bit,” said&nbsp;Mike Loewengart, managing director of investment strategy at E-Trade.</p><p>\"Keep in mind the Fed has made it clear that it won't let inflation increases necessarily sway it from its easy money policies and further any jumps like this could be transitory. So is this a trend? That remains to be seen,\" Loewengart said.</p><p>Tech shares, which have been under pressure this week and this month, were falling in the premarket again Wednesday. Shares of Alphabet, Microsoft, Netflix, Facebook and Apple all traded in the red, while shares of chipmakers Nvidia and AMD were also lower in the premarket.</p><p>Shares tied to the reopening also fell in the premarket. Carnival Corp, Boeing and United Airlines were lower in premarket trading.</p><p>The strength in bank stocks and energy shares in premarket helped support the broader market. JPMorgan rose 1%, while Occidental Petroleum climbed 1.4%. Chevron also traded higher.</p><p>The technology sector pulled off&nbsp;a big intraday reversal&nbsp;in the previous session where the Nasdaq Composite erased a loss north of 2% and ended the day flat. The blue-chip Dow, however, lost more than 450 points to suffer its worst day since February. The S&amp;P 500 slipped 0.9%, but avoided its second straight 1% loss.</p><p>The Technology Select Sector SPDR is off by more than 1% this week and 3% this month, as investors reassess the group's high valuations in the face of rising inflation.</p><p>During Tuesday's session, theCBOE Volatility Index, a measure of fear in the markets derived by option prices on the S&amp;P 500, jumped as high as 23.73, levels not seen in two months.&nbsp;The VIX was higher in early trading Wednesday.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Stocks take a hit as trading opens Wednesday, spooked by inflation data</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nStocks take a hit as trading opens Wednesday, spooked by inflation data\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-05-12 21:31</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>(May 12)&nbsp;Stocks take a hit as trading opens Wednesday, spooked by inflation data.&nbsp;</p><p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell more than 150 points, following its worst day since February. The S&amp;P 500 lost 0.6%, while the tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite slid more than 1%.</p><p>Inflation acceleratedat its fastest pace since 2008 last month with the Consumer Price Index spiking 4.2% from a year ago, compared to the Dow Jones estimate for a 3.6% increase. The monthly gain was 0.8%, versus the expected 0.2%.</p><p>Excluding volatile food and energy prices, the core CPI increased 3% from the same period in 2020 and 0.9% on a monthly basis. The respective estimates were 2.3% and 0.3%.</p><p>“The markets have been hovering around all times highs with a lot of the reopening trade already priced in. So it’s not out of the question that the outsized inflation read could bring us back down to earth a bit,” said&nbsp;Mike Loewengart, managing director of investment strategy at E-Trade.</p><p>\"Keep in mind the Fed has made it clear that it won't let inflation increases necessarily sway it from its easy money policies and further any jumps like this could be transitory. So is this a trend? That remains to be seen,\" Loewengart said.</p><p>Tech shares, which have been under pressure this week and this month, were falling in the premarket again Wednesday. Shares of Alphabet, Microsoft, Netflix, Facebook and Apple all traded in the red, while shares of chipmakers Nvidia and AMD were also lower in the premarket.</p><p>Shares tied to the reopening also fell in the premarket. Carnival Corp, Boeing and United Airlines were lower in premarket trading.</p><p>The strength in bank stocks and energy shares in premarket helped support the broader market. JPMorgan rose 1%, while Occidental Petroleum climbed 1.4%. Chevron also traded higher.</p><p>The technology sector pulled off&nbsp;a big intraday reversal&nbsp;in the previous session where the Nasdaq Composite erased a loss north of 2% and ended the day flat. The blue-chip Dow, however, lost more than 450 points to suffer its worst day since February. The S&amp;P 500 slipped 0.9%, but avoided its second straight 1% loss.</p><p>The Technology Select Sector SPDR is off by more than 1% this week and 3% this month, as investors reassess the group's high valuations in the face of rising inflation.</p><p>During Tuesday's session, theCBOE Volatility Index, a measure of fear in the markets derived by option prices on the S&amp;P 500, jumped as high as 23.73, levels not seen in two months.&nbsp;The VIX was higher in early trading Wednesday.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite","SPY":"标普500ETF",".DJI":"道琼斯",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1109603661","content_text":"(May 12) Stocks take a hit as trading opens Wednesday, spooked by inflation data. The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell more than 150 points, following its worst day since February. The S&P 500 lost 0.6%, while the tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite slid more than 1%.Inflation acceleratedat its fastest pace since 2008 last month with the Consumer Price Index spiking 4.2% from a year ago, compared to the Dow Jones estimate for a 3.6% increase. The monthly gain was 0.8%, versus the expected 0.2%.Excluding volatile food and energy prices, the core CPI increased 3% from the same period in 2020 and 0.9% on a monthly basis. The respective estimates were 2.3% and 0.3%.“The markets have been hovering around all times highs with a lot of the reopening trade already priced in. So it’s not out of the question that the outsized inflation read could bring us back down to earth a bit,” said Mike Loewengart, managing director of investment strategy at E-Trade.\"Keep in mind the Fed has made it clear that it won't let inflation increases necessarily sway it from its easy money policies and further any jumps like this could be transitory. So is this a trend? That remains to be seen,\" Loewengart said.Tech shares, which have been under pressure this week and this month, were falling in the premarket again Wednesday. Shares of Alphabet, Microsoft, Netflix, Facebook and Apple all traded in the red, while shares of chipmakers Nvidia and AMD were also lower in the premarket.Shares tied to the reopening also fell in the premarket. Carnival Corp, Boeing and United Airlines were lower in premarket trading.The strength in bank stocks and energy shares in premarket helped support the broader market. JPMorgan rose 1%, while Occidental Petroleum climbed 1.4%. Chevron also traded higher.The technology sector pulled off a big intraday reversal in the previous session where the Nasdaq Composite erased a loss north of 2% and ended the day flat. The blue-chip Dow, however, lost more than 450 points to suffer its worst day since February. The S&P 500 slipped 0.9%, but avoided its second straight 1% loss.The Technology Select Sector SPDR is off by more than 1% this week and 3% this month, as investors reassess the group's high valuations in the face of rising inflation.During Tuesday's session, theCBOE Volatility Index, a measure of fear in the markets derived by option prices on the S&P 500, jumped as high as 23.73, levels not seen in two months. The VIX was higher in early trading Wednesday.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":361,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[{"author":{"id":"3578484590506261","authorId":"3578484590506261","authorIdStr":"3578484590506261","name":"AkiraAizawa","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c26b60916777def45d34dbe72f0a1c69","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3578484590506261"},"content":"I understand how you feel","text":"I understand how you feel","html":"I understand how you feel"}],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":193954396,"gmtCreate":1620747711515,"gmtModify":1704347842456,"author":{"id":"3576837088119232","authorId":"3576837088119232","authorIdStr":"3576837088119232","name":"文氏","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13ab58f27225c31b03dde6b684f98f7e","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576837088119232"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Oh mannnn..worrying&nbsp;","listText":"Oh mannnn..worrying&nbsp;","text":"Oh mannnn..worrying","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/193954396","repostId":"1185197052","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1185197052","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1620739869,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1185197052?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-05-11 21:31","market":"us","language":"en","title":"U.S. stocks slump at Tuesday's open as inflation fears continue to buffett tech stocks","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1185197052","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"(May 11) U.S. stocks slump at Tuesday's open as inflation fears continue to buffett tech stocks. Nas","content":"<p>(May 11)&nbsp;U.S. stocks slump at Tuesday's open as inflation fears continue to buffett tech stocks.&nbsp;Nasdaq sheds another 2% as Big Tech sell-off intensifies, Dow drops nearly&nbsp;300 points.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/23aa647034a4b0db21395b6761549e8b\" tg-width=\"1242\" tg-height=\"541\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">Big Tech stocks were all in the red once again Tuesday. Apple dropped nearly 3%, while Facebook, Alphabet and Amazon were all down more than 2% in premarket trading.</p><p>Tesla shares, the poster boy for growth stocks with lofty valuations and expectations,&nbsp;fell nearly 7% in premarket trading. A Reuters report that the electric carmaker halted plans to expand its Shanghai plant into an export hub, also aided the decline.</p><p>“It was an intensification and acceleration in money rotating towards sectors that are more exposed to 1) An economic reflation (so cyclicals) and 2) Rising inflation,” Tom Essaye, founder of Sevens Report, said in a note.</p><p>Tech shares, which were the biggest pandemic winners, fell out of favor earlier this year as fears of inflation and higher interest rates crept up. Growth-oriented companies tend to get hit hard by rising rates as they erode the value of their future earnings.</p><p>The latest headlines including a labor shortage as well as a jump in Consumer Price Index in March helped fuel inflation worries and accelerate selling of tech shares.</p><p>Big Tech got clobbered on Monday as investors exited stocks likeAppleandMicrosoft, dragging the Dow Jones Industrial Average and the S&amp;P 500 off their record highs in the process. Both of those stocks lost at least 2% to start the week.</p><p>The Nasdaq Composite suffered the worse of the selling and fell 2.5%, finishing the day at its session low on Monday. Facebook lost more than 4%, while Amazon and Netflix both dropped over 3%.Alphabetdipped more than 2% after a downgrade by Citigroup. Cathie Wood’s Ark Innovation ETF fell 5% toits lowest level since NovemberasTesla, its top holding, shed more than 6%.</p><p>The ARK Innovation ETF was down another 4% in premarket trading Tuesday.</p><p>The market is divided in May with the Nasdaq Composite down 4% and the Dow up 2.5% as investors rotate away from growth shares with relatively high valuations into value stocks that will benefit from the economy reopening from the pandemic and higher inflation.</p><p>The Technology Select SPDR (XLK) is down 3% so far in May, the worst of any of the market sectors. The XLK was down another 1.3% in premarket trading Tuesday.</p><p>The broader S&amp;P 500 has managed to remain barely in the green for May amid this market rotation, but it may lose that gain if the tech selling intensifies and value stocks don’t pick up the slack.</p><p>Simon Property Groupsaw its stock retreat about 3% in the premarket despite better-than-expected numbers. The real estate property manager reported first-quarter earnings of $1.36 per share on revenues of $1.15 billion.</p><p>The Labor Department will on Tuesday publish the latest results of its Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey. Several high-ranking Federal Reserve officials, including Governor Lael Brainard and New York Fed President John Williams, are also scheduled to deliver remarks.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>U.S. stocks slump at Tuesday's open as inflation fears continue to buffett tech stocks</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nU.S. stocks slump at Tuesday's open as inflation fears continue to buffett tech stocks\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-05-11 21:31</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>(May 11)&nbsp;U.S. stocks slump at Tuesday's open as inflation fears continue to buffett tech stocks.&nbsp;Nasdaq sheds another 2% as Big Tech sell-off intensifies, Dow drops nearly&nbsp;300 points.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/23aa647034a4b0db21395b6761549e8b\" tg-width=\"1242\" tg-height=\"541\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">Big Tech stocks were all in the red once again Tuesday. Apple dropped nearly 3%, while Facebook, Alphabet and Amazon were all down more than 2% in premarket trading.</p><p>Tesla shares, the poster boy for growth stocks with lofty valuations and expectations,&nbsp;fell nearly 7% in premarket trading. A Reuters report that the electric carmaker halted plans to expand its Shanghai plant into an export hub, also aided the decline.</p><p>“It was an intensification and acceleration in money rotating towards sectors that are more exposed to 1) An economic reflation (so cyclicals) and 2) Rising inflation,” Tom Essaye, founder of Sevens Report, said in a note.</p><p>Tech shares, which were the biggest pandemic winners, fell out of favor earlier this year as fears of inflation and higher interest rates crept up. Growth-oriented companies tend to get hit hard by rising rates as they erode the value of their future earnings.</p><p>The latest headlines including a labor shortage as well as a jump in Consumer Price Index in March helped fuel inflation worries and accelerate selling of tech shares.</p><p>Big Tech got clobbered on Monday as investors exited stocks likeAppleandMicrosoft, dragging the Dow Jones Industrial Average and the S&amp;P 500 off their record highs in the process. Both of those stocks lost at least 2% to start the week.</p><p>The Nasdaq Composite suffered the worse of the selling and fell 2.5%, finishing the day at its session low on Monday. Facebook lost more than 4%, while Amazon and Netflix both dropped over 3%.Alphabetdipped more than 2% after a downgrade by Citigroup. Cathie Wood’s Ark Innovation ETF fell 5% toits lowest level since NovemberasTesla, its top holding, shed more than 6%.</p><p>The ARK Innovation ETF was down another 4% in premarket trading Tuesday.</p><p>The market is divided in May with the Nasdaq Composite down 4% and the Dow up 2.5% as investors rotate away from growth shares with relatively high valuations into value stocks that will benefit from the economy reopening from the pandemic and higher inflation.</p><p>The Technology Select SPDR (XLK) is down 3% so far in May, the worst of any of the market sectors. The XLK was down another 1.3% in premarket trading Tuesday.</p><p>The broader S&amp;P 500 has managed to remain barely in the green for May amid this market rotation, but it may lose that gain if the tech selling intensifies and value stocks don’t pick up the slack.</p><p>Simon Property Groupsaw its stock retreat about 3% in the premarket despite better-than-expected numbers. The real estate property manager reported first-quarter earnings of $1.36 per share on revenues of $1.15 billion.</p><p>The Labor Department will on Tuesday publish the latest results of its Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey. Several high-ranking Federal Reserve officials, including Governor Lael Brainard and New York Fed President John Williams, are also scheduled to deliver remarks.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯","SPY":"标普500ETF",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1185197052","content_text":"(May 11) U.S. stocks slump at Tuesday's open as inflation fears continue to buffett tech stocks. Nasdaq sheds another 2% as Big Tech sell-off intensifies, Dow drops nearly 300 points.Big Tech stocks were all in the red once again Tuesday. Apple dropped nearly 3%, while Facebook, Alphabet and Amazon were all down more than 2% in premarket trading.Tesla shares, the poster boy for growth stocks with lofty valuations and expectations, fell nearly 7% in premarket trading. A Reuters report that the electric carmaker halted plans to expand its Shanghai plant into an export hub, also aided the decline.“It was an intensification and acceleration in money rotating towards sectors that are more exposed to 1) An economic reflation (so cyclicals) and 2) Rising inflation,” Tom Essaye, founder of Sevens Report, said in a note.Tech shares, which were the biggest pandemic winners, fell out of favor earlier this year as fears of inflation and higher interest rates crept up. Growth-oriented companies tend to get hit hard by rising rates as they erode the value of their future earnings.The latest headlines including a labor shortage as well as a jump in Consumer Price Index in March helped fuel inflation worries and accelerate selling of tech shares.Big Tech got clobbered on Monday as investors exited stocks likeAppleandMicrosoft, dragging the Dow Jones Industrial Average and the S&P 500 off their record highs in the process. Both of those stocks lost at least 2% to start the week.The Nasdaq Composite suffered the worse of the selling and fell 2.5%, finishing the day at its session low on Monday. Facebook lost more than 4%, while Amazon and Netflix both dropped over 3%.Alphabetdipped more than 2% after a downgrade by Citigroup. Cathie Wood’s Ark Innovation ETF fell 5% toits lowest level since NovemberasTesla, its top holding, shed more than 6%.The ARK Innovation ETF was down another 4% in premarket trading Tuesday.The market is divided in May with the Nasdaq Composite down 4% and the Dow up 2.5% as investors rotate away from growth shares with relatively high valuations into value stocks that will benefit from the economy reopening from the pandemic and higher inflation.The Technology Select SPDR (XLK) is down 3% so far in May, the worst of any of the market sectors. The XLK was down another 1.3% in premarket trading Tuesday.The broader S&P 500 has managed to remain barely in the green for May amid this market rotation, but it may lose that gain if the tech selling intensifies and value stocks don’t pick up the slack.Simon Property Groupsaw its stock retreat about 3% in the premarket despite better-than-expected numbers. The real estate property manager reported first-quarter earnings of $1.36 per share on revenues of $1.15 billion.The Labor Department will on Tuesday publish the latest results of its Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey. Several high-ranking Federal Reserve officials, including Governor Lael Brainard and New York Fed President John Williams, are also scheduled to deliver remarks.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":125,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":106713766,"gmtCreate":1620144803055,"gmtModify":1704339344926,"author":{"id":"3576837088119232","authorId":"3576837088119232","authorIdStr":"3576837088119232","name":"文氏","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13ab58f27225c31b03dde6b684f98f7e","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576837088119232"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Not surprising","listText":"Not surprising","text":"Not surprising","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/106713766","repostId":"1174922086","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":329,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":106713370,"gmtCreate":1620144731590,"gmtModify":1704339343615,"author":{"id":"3576837088119232","authorId":"3576837088119232","authorIdStr":"3576837088119232","name":"文氏","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13ab58f27225c31b03dde6b684f98f7e","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576837088119232"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Omg&nbsp;","listText":"Omg&nbsp;","text":"Omg","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/106713370","repostId":"1195636027","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1195636027","pubTimestamp":1620137110,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1195636027?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-05-04 22:05","market":"us","language":"en","title":"\"It Could Get Weird\": Stocks Puke As \"Extreme\" Negative Gamma Strikes","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1195636027","media":"zerohedge","summary":"Just like late February when we had the firstinflation scare-cum-Treasury tantrum,Tech is breaking d","content":"<p>Just like late February when we had the first<i>inflation scare-cum-Treasury tantrum,</i>Tech is breaking down, and look no further than Amazon for the evidence.</p>\n<p>In just the three days since reporting blowout Q1 earnings which sent its stock to a new all time high, AMZN stock is down over 9% and is on the verge of a correction. Other FAAMGs, most notably Apple which had a just as impressive quarter, are not faring any better.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c89d66b1ced8ac68b5fb3ff40b54f134\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"240\"></p>\n<p>However, unlike late February when tech was monkeyhammered mostly as a result of sharply surging yields, this time there is the double whammy of deeply negative gamma.</p>\n<p>AsSpotGamma wrote overnight, \"both SPY &amp; QQQ remain in negative gamma territory which implies higher relative volatility.\"</p>\n<p>Nomura's resident x-asset expert, Chalie McElligott, picks on this and in a note this morning writes that while \"there is nothing exceedingly bulky or “whale-like” by itself\", there has<b>\"been a pick-up with broad Vol / Gamma selling from clients in recent weeks.\"</b>The details:</p>\n<ul>\n <li>This has show via standard overwriter flows in singles and index, but also to the systematic strangle-selling mentioned in the press last week (which looks like the odd-lottish flows in ratios that trade ~3-4x’s a week, while there too is a separate daily overwriter program in one month straddles for example)…<b>all of which has contributed to what has been a very “long gamma” dynamic for Dealers—and thus the “stuck” S&amp;P for about three weeks, pinging around the gravity of the big strikes at 4150-4200</b></li>\n <li>The %ile rank of the overall $Gamma magnitude across US Equities index has come-off after recent expirations (SPX / SPY consolidated now a middling 56.6%ile $Gamma / IWM 35.9%ile; EEM 37.4%ile); however,<b>Nasdaq / QQQ’s continue to be the epicenter for how broad index movement could get weird, with -$435.8mm $Gamma which is extremely negative at just 3.8%ile</b></li>\n</ul>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0dbb4e73ce8bc66785a7aa43170b3dc3\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"648\">Needless to say, negative QQQ gamma + tech selloff = explosive combination, and as McElligott summarizes, \"with this “extreme” negative $Gamma in QQQ,<b>we see Dealers increasingly moving into “short Gamma vs spot” territory as well</b>(Gamma “neutral line” at 339.36 vs spot 333.55); similarly, we currently see Dealers “short Gamma vs spot” too in both IWM (226.19 “neutral line” vs 224.79 spot) and EEM (54.29 “neutral line” vs spot 53.59)\"</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c7be1b134edacd8fc5831a10f026c1d2\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"311\">Tech's inability to breakout higher has crippled sentiment, and as the Nomura quant concludes, following what had been a strong recovery in April for the Tech sector and “Secular Growth” (aided by the stabilization in USTs and relative “bull-flattening” off the extremes of the March Rates selloff / “bear-steepening”) \"our Nomura Sector Sentiment analysis shows that WoW, we have seen Tech sector sentiment collapse (again)--with an 85.1%ile score a week ago, but today printing down at 53.9%\"</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/938a77b986fc7fbbd0450254e29b7dce\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"277\">And as the tech revulsion spreads, dragging Nasdaq lower...</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/35406354f6f369f0aa382d819a26ea4e\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"260\">... it is starting to hit broader indexesm such as the S&amp;P and Russell...</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0d50bd11171fa55adf45caf3cf0ab389\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"285\">... which just dipped below its 50dma.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5b8200d703a1c2d305811eadd35af3c3\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"227\"></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>\"It Could Get Weird\": Stocks Puke As \"Extreme\" Negative Gamma Strikes</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n\"It Could Get Weird\": Stocks Puke As \"Extreme\" Negative Gamma Strikes\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-05-04 22:05 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/it-could-get-weird-stocks-puke-extreme-negative-gamma-strikes?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29><strong>zerohedge</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Just like late February when we had the firstinflation scare-cum-Treasury tantrum,Tech is breaking down, and look no further than Amazon for the evidence.\nIn just the three days since reporting ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/it-could-get-weird-stocks-puke-extreme-negative-gamma-strikes?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".DJI":"道琼斯","SPY":"标普500ETF"},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/it-could-get-weird-stocks-puke-extreme-negative-gamma-strikes?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1195636027","content_text":"Just like late February when we had the firstinflation scare-cum-Treasury tantrum,Tech is breaking down, and look no further than Amazon for the evidence.\nIn just the three days since reporting blowout Q1 earnings which sent its stock to a new all time high, AMZN stock is down over 9% and is on the verge of a correction. Other FAAMGs, most notably Apple which had a just as impressive quarter, are not faring any better.\n\nHowever, unlike late February when tech was monkeyhammered mostly as a result of sharply surging yields, this time there is the double whammy of deeply negative gamma.\nAsSpotGamma wrote overnight, \"both SPY & QQQ remain in negative gamma territory which implies higher relative volatility.\"\nNomura's resident x-asset expert, Chalie McElligott, picks on this and in a note this morning writes that while \"there is nothing exceedingly bulky or “whale-like” by itself\", there has\"been a pick-up with broad Vol / Gamma selling from clients in recent weeks.\"The details:\n\nThis has show via standard overwriter flows in singles and index, but also to the systematic strangle-selling mentioned in the press last week (which looks like the odd-lottish flows in ratios that trade ~3-4x’s a week, while there too is a separate daily overwriter program in one month straddles for example)…all of which has contributed to what has been a very “long gamma” dynamic for Dealers—and thus the “stuck” S&P for about three weeks, pinging around the gravity of the big strikes at 4150-4200\nThe %ile rank of the overall $Gamma magnitude across US Equities index has come-off after recent expirations (SPX / SPY consolidated now a middling 56.6%ile $Gamma / IWM 35.9%ile; EEM 37.4%ile); however,Nasdaq / QQQ’s continue to be the epicenter for how broad index movement could get weird, with -$435.8mm $Gamma which is extremely negative at just 3.8%ile\n\nNeedless to say, negative QQQ gamma + tech selloff = explosive combination, and as McElligott summarizes, \"with this “extreme” negative $Gamma in QQQ,we see Dealers increasingly moving into “short Gamma vs spot” territory as well(Gamma “neutral line” at 339.36 vs spot 333.55); similarly, we currently see Dealers “short Gamma vs spot” too in both IWM (226.19 “neutral line” vs 224.79 spot) and EEM (54.29 “neutral line” vs spot 53.59)\"\nTech's inability to breakout higher has crippled sentiment, and as the Nomura quant concludes, following what had been a strong recovery in April for the Tech sector and “Secular Growth” (aided by the stabilization in USTs and relative “bull-flattening” off the extremes of the March Rates selloff / “bear-steepening”) \"our Nomura Sector Sentiment analysis shows that WoW, we have seen Tech sector sentiment collapse (again)--with an 85.1%ile score a week ago, but today printing down at 53.9%\"\nAnd as the tech revulsion spreads, dragging Nasdaq lower...\n... it is starting to hit broader indexesm such as the S&P and Russell...\n... which just dipped below its 50dma.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":321,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":106706972,"gmtCreate":1620142856796,"gmtModify":1704339305205,"author":{"id":"3576837088119232","authorId":"3576837088119232","authorIdStr":"3576837088119232","name":"文氏","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13ab58f27225c31b03dde6b684f98f7e","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576837088119232"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"I'm not so sure","listText":"I'm not so sure","text":"I'm not so sure","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/106706972","repostId":"2132178325","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2132178325","pubTimestamp":1620129867,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2132178325?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-05-04 20:04","market":"us","language":"en","title":"3 Stocks to Buy When the Next Market Crash Comes","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2132178325","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"These quality stocks are expensive, so if the market crashes, jump on the opportunity to buy them at a discount.","content":"<p>The stock market has been soaring for a good year since it&nbsp;plummeted last March. Market crash predictions are common, and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE\">one</a> of these days, <i>it will happen</i>. The broad market outperformance has been out of sync with the global economic situation, and it does feel like the bubble could burst at any moment.</p>\n<p>In such a situation, investors should buy shares of <b>Lemonade</b> (NYSE:LMND), <b>Airbnb</b> (NASDAQ:ABNB), and <b>Fiverr</b> (NYSE:FVRR). They carry rich premiums as of this writing, but in the fallout of a broad market downturn, they should be at the top of your watchlist.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ed4e36321270d032e6043a5374300bba\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"465\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>Image source: Getty Images.</p>\n<p><b>Appealing to a new generation of insurance buyers</b></p>\n<p>Lemonade has been around since 2016, selling renters and homeowners insurance, and it dazzled investors during its market debut last July. Shares more than doubled from their IPO price of $29 per share on the first day of trading, and they more than quadrupled by year end. The stock has come down since then, now trading below 50% of its 52-week high, but it still boasts a price-to-sales valuation of 59, making it quite expensive.</p>\n<p>The insurtech, or insurance technology, company has amassed over a million customers in its short lifetime, reaching a milestone that took older insurance companies decades. Insurance buyers are drawn to Lemonade's customer-centric and speedy service -- it has paid out claims in as little as <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> second.</p>\n<p>Lemonade launched pet insurance last July, and life insurance rolled out this year. It's collecting troves of data to power its services, and this is how it can ask customers a series of questions and instantly offer a price quote for a policy and provide instant claims approvals (though only 30% approvals go this route -- the rest go to a live representative).</p>\n<p>This is also how the company has been able to scale its products and launch new ones. There is now at least one product offered in all 50 U.S. states, and the company recently announced the early stage launch of its auto insurance offering, Lemonade Car. Management believes they can catch policy buyers early, perhaps when seeking a low-priced renters policy, but then for the same customer acquisition cost, keep them on as they cycle through life events and require more expensive policies.</p>\n<p>Fourth-quarter 2020 results didn't impress investors, sending the stock plummeting, but you should think of this market reaction as the inevitable ups and downs of emerging companies. There's so much potential here for Lemonade to disrupt a $5 trillion global industry, and this is a great stock to load up on in the event of a crash.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0340c7880c0a59ddbd5b12f964ba697a\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>Image source: Airbnb.</p>\n<p><b>Creating a new travel industry</b></p>\n<p>Airbnb has upended the travel industry with its platform for vacation rentals that connects property owners and travelers. There are many benefits to its system -- stays often cost less than a hotel, host and property ratings let users know what to expect, and travelers can enjoy locations and unique experiences that may lack traditional acccommodations.</p>\n<p>That's why investors so highly anticipated Airbnb's IPO, and they sent the stock soaring in its first few months on the market. As with Lemonade, that enthusiasm has waned recently, but the stock is still trading at 31 times sales (or 22 times pre-pandemic 2019 revenue).</p>\n<p>The company still faces the challenge of reduced travel due to the pandemic, and market conditions will need time to recover. Fourth-quarter revenue decreased 22% year over year, and gross booking value declined 31%. That's an improvement over the beginning of 2020, but it's understandable the stock has lost steam, especially given its high valuation.</p>\n<p>But as travel comes back, sales and GBV should begin to gain momentum. Long term, management sees a serviceable addressable market of $1.5 trillion and a total addressable market of $3.4 trillion, making 2020 sales of $3.4 billion just a starting point for long-term growth.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/93e7854bb0d133ab437556088005f2f6\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>Image source: Getty Images.</p>\n<p><b>The rise of the gig economy</b></p>\n<p>The world has changed after the pandemic, and one prominent way is how we work. Fiverr, which connects freelancers and clients, is at the forefront of the work-from-home revolution, and it's poised to lead this space even after the pandemic.</p>\n<p>Fiverr went public in 2019. Its stock struggled that year, but it went on to gain over 700% in 2020 before losing steam this year as part of the broader tech sell-off. Trailing the <b>S&amp;P 500</b> year to date, shares still trade at 39 times sales.</p>\n<p>2020 revenue increased 77% year over year, but Fiverr's $190 million top line is a fraction of its $115 billion total addressable market. And the market is wide open as only a tiny portion of freelancing has migrated online. As the industry goes digital, and more people work from home, there's vast upside for Fiverr.</p>\n<p>So why Fiverr? It has a well-established platform with 500 freelance categories and a large suite of digital capabilities. It also has high net promoter scores from both freelancers and buyers, and happy users will continue to pay their fees to connect over the platform. That's already happening: In the fourth quarter, annual spend per buyer increased 20% year over year to $205.</p>\n<p>Fiverr, Lemonade, and Airbnb are all great companies disrupting large traditional industries, giving them a long runway for growth. If you have a greater appetite for risk, buy them now as recent declines present an opportunity of their own. Otherwise, if the market slides and prices drop further, even more conservative investors should consider adding these stocks to their portfolio.</p>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>3 Stocks to Buy When the Next Market Crash Comes</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n3 Stocks to Buy When the Next Market Crash Comes\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-05-04 20:04 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/05/04/3-stocks-to-buy-when-the-next-market-crash-comes/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The stock market has been soaring for a good year since it plummeted last March. Market crash predictions are common, and one of these days, it will happen. The broad market outperformance has been ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/05/04/3-stocks-to-buy-when-the-next-market-crash-comes/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/05/04/3-stocks-to-buy-when-the-next-market-crash-comes/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2132178325","content_text":"The stock market has been soaring for a good year since it plummeted last March. Market crash predictions are common, and one of these days, it will happen. The broad market outperformance has been out of sync with the global economic situation, and it does feel like the bubble could burst at any moment.\nIn such a situation, investors should buy shares of Lemonade (NYSE:LMND), Airbnb (NASDAQ:ABNB), and Fiverr (NYSE:FVRR). They carry rich premiums as of this writing, but in the fallout of a broad market downturn, they should be at the top of your watchlist.\n\nImage source: Getty Images.\nAppealing to a new generation of insurance buyers\nLemonade has been around since 2016, selling renters and homeowners insurance, and it dazzled investors during its market debut last July. Shares more than doubled from their IPO price of $29 per share on the first day of trading, and they more than quadrupled by year end. The stock has come down since then, now trading below 50% of its 52-week high, but it still boasts a price-to-sales valuation of 59, making it quite expensive.\nThe insurtech, or insurance technology, company has amassed over a million customers in its short lifetime, reaching a milestone that took older insurance companies decades. Insurance buyers are drawn to Lemonade's customer-centric and speedy service -- it has paid out claims in as little as one second.\nLemonade launched pet insurance last July, and life insurance rolled out this year. It's collecting troves of data to power its services, and this is how it can ask customers a series of questions and instantly offer a price quote for a policy and provide instant claims approvals (though only 30% approvals go this route -- the rest go to a live representative).\nThis is also how the company has been able to scale its products and launch new ones. There is now at least one product offered in all 50 U.S. states, and the company recently announced the early stage launch of its auto insurance offering, Lemonade Car. Management believes they can catch policy buyers early, perhaps when seeking a low-priced renters policy, but then for the same customer acquisition cost, keep them on as they cycle through life events and require more expensive policies.\nFourth-quarter 2020 results didn't impress investors, sending the stock plummeting, but you should think of this market reaction as the inevitable ups and downs of emerging companies. There's so much potential here for Lemonade to disrupt a $5 trillion global industry, and this is a great stock to load up on in the event of a crash.\n\nImage source: Airbnb.\nCreating a new travel industry\nAirbnb has upended the travel industry with its platform for vacation rentals that connects property owners and travelers. There are many benefits to its system -- stays often cost less than a hotel, host and property ratings let users know what to expect, and travelers can enjoy locations and unique experiences that may lack traditional acccommodations.\nThat's why investors so highly anticipated Airbnb's IPO, and they sent the stock soaring in its first few months on the market. As with Lemonade, that enthusiasm has waned recently, but the stock is still trading at 31 times sales (or 22 times pre-pandemic 2019 revenue).\nThe company still faces the challenge of reduced travel due to the pandemic, and market conditions will need time to recover. Fourth-quarter revenue decreased 22% year over year, and gross booking value declined 31%. That's an improvement over the beginning of 2020, but it's understandable the stock has lost steam, especially given its high valuation.\nBut as travel comes back, sales and GBV should begin to gain momentum. Long term, management sees a serviceable addressable market of $1.5 trillion and a total addressable market of $3.4 trillion, making 2020 sales of $3.4 billion just a starting point for long-term growth.\n\nImage source: Getty Images.\nThe rise of the gig economy\nThe world has changed after the pandemic, and one prominent way is how we work. Fiverr, which connects freelancers and clients, is at the forefront of the work-from-home revolution, and it's poised to lead this space even after the pandemic.\nFiverr went public in 2019. Its stock struggled that year, but it went on to gain over 700% in 2020 before losing steam this year as part of the broader tech sell-off. Trailing the S&P 500 year to date, shares still trade at 39 times sales.\n2020 revenue increased 77% year over year, but Fiverr's $190 million top line is a fraction of its $115 billion total addressable market. And the market is wide open as only a tiny portion of freelancing has migrated online. As the industry goes digital, and more people work from home, there's vast upside for Fiverr.\nSo why Fiverr? It has a well-established platform with 500 freelance categories and a large suite of digital capabilities. It also has high net promoter scores from both freelancers and buyers, and happy users will continue to pay their fees to connect over the platform. That's already happening: In the fourth quarter, annual spend per buyer increased 20% year over year to $205.\nFiverr, Lemonade, and Airbnb are all great companies disrupting large traditional industries, giving them a long runway for growth. If you have a greater appetite for risk, buy them now as recent declines present an opportunity of their own. Otherwise, if the market slides and prices drop further, even more conservative investors should consider adding these stocks to their portfolio.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":313,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":106708147,"gmtCreate":1620142797889,"gmtModify":1704339303893,"author":{"id":"3576837088119232","authorId":"3576837088119232","authorIdStr":"3576837088119232","name":"文氏","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13ab58f27225c31b03dde6b684f98f7e","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576837088119232"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Covid was no where near over but people forgot that ..&nbsp;","listText":"Covid was no where near over but people forgot that ..&nbsp;","text":"Covid was no where near over but people forgot that ..","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/106708147","repostId":"1142616846","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":493,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":106703402,"gmtCreate":1620142691606,"gmtModify":1704339301935,"author":{"id":"3576837088119232","authorId":"3576837088119232","authorIdStr":"3576837088119232","name":"文氏","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13ab58f27225c31b03dde6b684f98f7e","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576837088119232"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ahhh..","listText":"Ahhh..","text":"Ahhh..","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/106703402","repostId":"1107772617","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1107772617","pubTimestamp":1620139709,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1107772617?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-05-04 22:48","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Opinion: Why you should worry about the flood of new cash into U.S. stock funds","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1107772617","media":"MarketWatch","summary":"With investments, popular is not better.U.S. stock funds now are riding a river of new cash from inv","content":"<blockquote><b>With investments, popular is not better.</b></blockquote><p>U.S. stock funds now are riding a river of new cash from investors — and that is not a bullish sign.</p><p>Many investors might see this differently — that a huge influx of cash is positive. In fact, fund flows are a contrarian indicator: the U.S. stock market in the past has performed better when there is a net outflow of cash.</p><p>The evidence is summarized in the chart below, which plots net inflows of cash to U.S. stock funds (both open-end and exchange-traded funds) by year over the past decade. Notice that in all but two of the years since 2010 there have been net outflows.</p><p><b>Reversal</b></p><p>Net flows into U.S. equity (open-endded funds and ETF), in billions</p><p></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0c9c4ef1e3533acd3d248af32cdf728f\" tg-width=\"780\" tg-height=\"308\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>This 2010-2020 period was extremely strong for U.S. stocks. Yet over this time U.S. stock funds experienced a net outflow of $741 billion. (Data are from TrimTabs, a part of EPFR, a division of Informa Financial Intelligence.)</p><p>This year so far is seeing a major reversal of this longer-term trend. For the first four months of this year, according to TrimTabs, U.S. equity funds have received net inflows of $142.3 billion. If this pace were to continue for the full year, there would be $427 billion of net inflows in 2021 — retracing more than half the total outflow from 2010 through 2020.</p><p>One study that puts this huge year-to-date inflow in a bearish light appeared last December in the Review of Finance. Entitled “ETF Arbitrage, Non-Fundamental Demand, and Return Predictability,” the study was conducted by David Brown of the University of Arizona, Shaun William Davies of the University of Colorado Boulder and Matthew Ringgenberg of the University of Utah. The researchers found that, on average, the ETFs with the biggest outflows outperformed the ETFs with the biggest inflows for up to a year after these extreme flows.</p><p>Another academic study that reached a similar conclusion has been circulating since January. Entitled “Competition for Attention in the ETF Space,” the study was conducted by Itzhak Ben-David and Byungwook Kim of Ohio State University, Francesco Franzoni of the University of Lugano in Switzerland and Rabih Moussawi of Villanova University. The researchers focused on the specialized ETFs that are created to capitalize on investor fads and market trends, and which typically receive a big influx of cash soon after launch. They found that these ETFs over their first five years after launch lag the market on a risk-adjusted basis by 5% per year on average.</p><p>The tenuous relationship between performance and fund flows is evident also in the accompanying tables. The first lists the 10 ETFs with the best year-to-date returns. The second table lists the 10 ETFs with the largest net inflows. (Return data are from FactSet; flow data are from CFRA Research).</p><p>Notice that none of the funds in the first table appears in the second.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a2e0354f1f5c9cfd5611c3f6e03c3cee\" tg-width=\"887\" tg-height=\"497\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a5cd98cfa89435ba9ae4a0bfdedd3891\" tg-width=\"830\" tg-height=\"447\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>","source":"lsy1603348471595","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Opinion: Why you should worry about the flood of new cash into U.S. stock funds</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nOpinion: Why you should worry about the flood of new cash into U.S. stock funds\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-05-04 22:48 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.marketwatch.com/story/why-you-should-worry-about-the-flood-of-new-cash-into-u-s-stock-funds-11620102925?mod=home-page><strong>MarketWatch</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>With investments, popular is not better.U.S. stock funds now are riding a river of new cash from investors — and that is not a bullish sign.Many investors might see this differently — that a huge ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/why-you-should-worry-about-the-flood-of-new-cash-into-u-s-stock-funds-11620102925?mod=home-page\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite","SPY":"标普500ETF",".DJI":"道琼斯",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index"},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/why-you-should-worry-about-the-flood-of-new-cash-into-u-s-stock-funds-11620102925?mod=home-page","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1107772617","content_text":"With investments, popular is not better.U.S. stock funds now are riding a river of new cash from investors — and that is not a bullish sign.Many investors might see this differently — that a huge influx of cash is positive. In fact, fund flows are a contrarian indicator: the U.S. stock market in the past has performed better when there is a net outflow of cash.The evidence is summarized in the chart below, which plots net inflows of cash to U.S. stock funds (both open-end and exchange-traded funds) by year over the past decade. Notice that in all but two of the years since 2010 there have been net outflows.ReversalNet flows into U.S. equity (open-endded funds and ETF), in billionsThis 2010-2020 period was extremely strong for U.S. stocks. Yet over this time U.S. stock funds experienced a net outflow of $741 billion. (Data are from TrimTabs, a part of EPFR, a division of Informa Financial Intelligence.)This year so far is seeing a major reversal of this longer-term trend. For the first four months of this year, according to TrimTabs, U.S. equity funds have received net inflows of $142.3 billion. If this pace were to continue for the full year, there would be $427 billion of net inflows in 2021 — retracing more than half the total outflow from 2010 through 2020.One study that puts this huge year-to-date inflow in a bearish light appeared last December in the Review of Finance. Entitled “ETF Arbitrage, Non-Fundamental Demand, and Return Predictability,” the study was conducted by David Brown of the University of Arizona, Shaun William Davies of the University of Colorado Boulder and Matthew Ringgenberg of the University of Utah. The researchers found that, on average, the ETFs with the biggest outflows outperformed the ETFs with the biggest inflows for up to a year after these extreme flows.Another academic study that reached a similar conclusion has been circulating since January. Entitled “Competition for Attention in the ETF Space,” the study was conducted by Itzhak Ben-David and Byungwook Kim of Ohio State University, Francesco Franzoni of the University of Lugano in Switzerland and Rabih Moussawi of Villanova University. The researchers focused on the specialized ETFs that are created to capitalize on investor fads and market trends, and which typically receive a big influx of cash soon after launch. They found that these ETFs over their first five years after launch lag the market on a risk-adjusted basis by 5% per year on average.The tenuous relationship between performance and fund flows is evident also in the accompanying tables. The first lists the 10 ETFs with the best year-to-date returns. The second table lists the 10 ETFs with the largest net inflows. (Return data are from FactSet; flow data are from CFRA Research).Notice that none of the funds in the first table appears in the second.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":357,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":103586892,"gmtCreate":1619793444716,"gmtModify":1704272497358,"author":{"id":"3576837088119232","authorId":"3576837088119232","authorIdStr":"3576837088119232","name":"文氏","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13ab58f27225c31b03dde6b684f98f7e","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576837088119232"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Yes!","listText":"Yes!","text":"Yes!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/103586892","repostId":"1142070002","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1142070002","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1619792975,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1142070002?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-04-30 22:29","market":"us","language":"en","title":"NIO rose more than 5%, after falling nearly 4% before","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1142070002","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"NIO Earnings Looked a Lot Like Ford’s. What to Know.Chinese electric vehicle maker NIO posted better than expected first quarter results. But the global automotive microchip shortage will hit production in the coming months.NIO  is a highly valued, high-growth stock. Now NIO bulls have to decide whether solid earnings will trump the growth hiccup or whether the chip shortage can hurt the company in the long run.NIO lost 23 cents a share on an adjusted, non-GAAP basis, from $1.2 billion in sales.","content":"<p>NIO rose more than 5%, after falling nearly 4% before.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/80881ae9e6de48ac5e3733583db3ba9e\" tg-width=\"840\" tg-height=\"470\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><b>NIO Earnings Looked a Lot Like Ford’s. What to Know.</b></p><p>Chinese electric vehicle maker NIO posted better than expected first quarter results. But the global automotive microchip shortage will hit production in the coming months.</p><p>NIO (ticker: NIO) is a highly valued, high-growth stock. Now NIO bulls have to decide whether solid earnings will trump the growth hiccup or whether the chip shortage can hurt the company in the long run.</p><p>NIO lost&nbsp;23 cents&nbsp;a share on an adjusted, non-GAAP basis, from $1.2 billion in sales. Wall Street was looking for a comparable 84 cent loss from $1.1 billion in sales. NIO’s corporate gross profit margin came in at 19.5%, about 3 percentage points better than analysts projected and up from negative 12% a year ago. First quarter results look solid.</p><p>The stock isn’t moving though. NIO reported numbers at 5:30 p.m. eastern time and not a lot of stock is trading after hours. NIO shares closed down 5.3% in Thursday trading. TheS&amp;P 500&nbsp;and&nbsp;Dow Jones Industrial Average&nbsp;rose about&nbsp; 0.7%.</p><p>“NIO started the year of 2021 with a new quarterly delivery record of 20,060 vehicles in the first quarter,” said CEO William Bin Li in the company’s news release. “The overall demand for our products continues to be quite strong, but the supply chain is still facing significant challenges due to the semiconductor shortage.”</p><p>Management called the chip situation “very severe” on its conference call and projected 21,000 to 22,000 vehicle deliveries for the second quarter and sales of about $1.3 billion. The Street is projecting $1.2 billion in sales. But the unit delivery guidance is a little lower than Deutsche Bank analyst Edison Yu had expected.</p><p>For the full year, Yu is modeling 95,000 deliveries. With about 42,000 deliveries likely for the first half of 2021, the resolution of the global chip shortage will go a long way to deciding whether or not NIO can reach Yu’s number.</p><p>Yu rates NIO shares Buy and has a $60 price target for the stock.</p><p>The overall quarter feels a little like&nbsp;Ford Motor‘s (F) quarter, which was&nbsp;reported Wednesday. Ford reported sales and earnings far better than Wall Street projected. Unit volumes were below the company’s internal projections, but improving vehicle mix boosted sales beyond Street projections. Ford prioritized making higher-end vehicles in the face of limited chip supply. Looking ahead, Ford said the impact of the chip shortage would be at the high end of the company’s initial $1 billion to $2.5 billion cost guidance.</p><p>Ford stock close down 9.4% Thursday, the day after the Wednesday evening report. The NIO second-quarter guidance isn’t as surprising as Ford’s. And NIO doesn’t have full-year guidance. But calling NIO’s stock price reaction is difficult.</p><p>Ford trades for less than 7 times estimated 2022 earnings. NIO is expected to become profitable on a full-year basis in 2022. What’s more, NIO is worth about 50% more than Ford.</p><p>NIO’s conference call wrapped up about 10 p.m. eastern time. After the chip shortage, analysts focused questions on EV competition in China and NIO’s production expansion. NIO is putting in place&nbsp;capacity to produce&nbsp;hundreds of thousands of vehicles in coming years.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>NIO rose more than 5%, after falling nearly 4% before</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nNIO rose more than 5%, after falling nearly 4% before\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-04-30 22:29</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>NIO rose more than 5%, after falling nearly 4% before.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/80881ae9e6de48ac5e3733583db3ba9e\" tg-width=\"840\" tg-height=\"470\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><b>NIO Earnings Looked a Lot Like Ford’s. What to Know.</b></p><p>Chinese electric vehicle maker NIO posted better than expected first quarter results. But the global automotive microchip shortage will hit production in the coming months.</p><p>NIO (ticker: NIO) is a highly valued, high-growth stock. Now NIO bulls have to decide whether solid earnings will trump the growth hiccup or whether the chip shortage can hurt the company in the long run.</p><p>NIO lost&nbsp;23 cents&nbsp;a share on an adjusted, non-GAAP basis, from $1.2 billion in sales. Wall Street was looking for a comparable 84 cent loss from $1.1 billion in sales. NIO’s corporate gross profit margin came in at 19.5%, about 3 percentage points better than analysts projected and up from negative 12% a year ago. First quarter results look solid.</p><p>The stock isn’t moving though. NIO reported numbers at 5:30 p.m. eastern time and not a lot of stock is trading after hours. NIO shares closed down 5.3% in Thursday trading. TheS&amp;P 500&nbsp;and&nbsp;Dow Jones Industrial Average&nbsp;rose about&nbsp; 0.7%.</p><p>“NIO started the year of 2021 with a new quarterly delivery record of 20,060 vehicles in the first quarter,” said CEO William Bin Li in the company’s news release. “The overall demand for our products continues to be quite strong, but the supply chain is still facing significant challenges due to the semiconductor shortage.”</p><p>Management called the chip situation “very severe” on its conference call and projected 21,000 to 22,000 vehicle deliveries for the second quarter and sales of about $1.3 billion. The Street is projecting $1.2 billion in sales. But the unit delivery guidance is a little lower than Deutsche Bank analyst Edison Yu had expected.</p><p>For the full year, Yu is modeling 95,000 deliveries. With about 42,000 deliveries likely for the first half of 2021, the resolution of the global chip shortage will go a long way to deciding whether or not NIO can reach Yu’s number.</p><p>Yu rates NIO shares Buy and has a $60 price target for the stock.</p><p>The overall quarter feels a little like&nbsp;Ford Motor‘s (F) quarter, which was&nbsp;reported Wednesday. Ford reported sales and earnings far better than Wall Street projected. Unit volumes were below the company’s internal projections, but improving vehicle mix boosted sales beyond Street projections. Ford prioritized making higher-end vehicles in the face of limited chip supply. Looking ahead, Ford said the impact of the chip shortage would be at the high end of the company’s initial $1 billion to $2.5 billion cost guidance.</p><p>Ford stock close down 9.4% Thursday, the day after the Wednesday evening report. The NIO second-quarter guidance isn’t as surprising as Ford’s. And NIO doesn’t have full-year guidance. But calling NIO’s stock price reaction is difficult.</p><p>Ford trades for less than 7 times estimated 2022 earnings. NIO is expected to become profitable on a full-year basis in 2022. What’s more, NIO is worth about 50% more than Ford.</p><p>NIO’s conference call wrapped up about 10 p.m. eastern time. After the chip shortage, analysts focused questions on EV competition in China and NIO’s production expansion. NIO is putting in place&nbsp;capacity to produce&nbsp;hundreds of thousands of vehicles in coming years.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NIO":"蔚来"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1142070002","content_text":"NIO rose more than 5%, after falling nearly 4% before.NIO Earnings Looked a Lot Like Ford’s. What to Know.Chinese electric vehicle maker NIO posted better than expected first quarter results. But the global automotive microchip shortage will hit production in the coming months.NIO (ticker: NIO) is a highly valued, high-growth stock. Now NIO bulls have to decide whether solid earnings will trump the growth hiccup or whether the chip shortage can hurt the company in the long run.NIO lost 23 cents a share on an adjusted, non-GAAP basis, from $1.2 billion in sales. Wall Street was looking for a comparable 84 cent loss from $1.1 billion in sales. NIO’s corporate gross profit margin came in at 19.5%, about 3 percentage points better than analysts projected and up from negative 12% a year ago. First quarter results look solid.The stock isn’t moving though. NIO reported numbers at 5:30 p.m. eastern time and not a lot of stock is trading after hours. NIO shares closed down 5.3% in Thursday trading. TheS&P 500 and Dow Jones Industrial Average rose about  0.7%.“NIO started the year of 2021 with a new quarterly delivery record of 20,060 vehicles in the first quarter,” said CEO William Bin Li in the company’s news release. “The overall demand for our products continues to be quite strong, but the supply chain is still facing significant challenges due to the semiconductor shortage.”Management called the chip situation “very severe” on its conference call and projected 21,000 to 22,000 vehicle deliveries for the second quarter and sales of about $1.3 billion. The Street is projecting $1.2 billion in sales. But the unit delivery guidance is a little lower than Deutsche Bank analyst Edison Yu had expected.For the full year, Yu is modeling 95,000 deliveries. With about 42,000 deliveries likely for the first half of 2021, the resolution of the global chip shortage will go a long way to deciding whether or not NIO can reach Yu’s number.Yu rates NIO shares Buy and has a $60 price target for the stock.The overall quarter feels a little like Ford Motor‘s (F) quarter, which was reported Wednesday. Ford reported sales and earnings far better than Wall Street projected. Unit volumes were below the company’s internal projections, but improving vehicle mix boosted sales beyond Street projections. Ford prioritized making higher-end vehicles in the face of limited chip supply. Looking ahead, Ford said the impact of the chip shortage would be at the high end of the company’s initial $1 billion to $2.5 billion cost guidance.Ford stock close down 9.4% Thursday, the day after the Wednesday evening report. The NIO second-quarter guidance isn’t as surprising as Ford’s. And NIO doesn’t have full-year guidance. But calling NIO’s stock price reaction is difficult.Ford trades for less than 7 times estimated 2022 earnings. NIO is expected to become profitable on a full-year basis in 2022. What’s more, NIO is worth about 50% more than Ford.NIO’s conference call wrapped up about 10 p.m. eastern time. After the chip shortage, analysts focused questions on EV competition in China and NIO’s production expansion. NIO is putting in place capacity to produce hundreds of thousands of vehicles in coming years.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":344,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":100673831,"gmtCreate":1619613528223,"gmtModify":1704726785737,"author":{"id":"3576837088119232","authorId":"3576837088119232","authorIdStr":"3576837088119232","name":"文氏","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13ab58f27225c31b03dde6b684f98f7e","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576837088119232"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hmmm food for thought&nbsp;","listText":"Hmmm food for thought&nbsp;","text":"Hmmm food for thought","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/100673831","repostId":"1138128459","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1138128459","pubTimestamp":1619608043,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1138128459?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-04-28 19:07","market":"us","language":"en","title":"5 Ultra-Popular Growth Stocks With 28% to 56% Upside, According to Wall Street","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1138128459","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"For 13 months, Wall Street has proved virtually unstoppable. Since hitting a bear market bottom on M","content":"<p>For 13 months, Wall Street has proved virtually unstoppable. Since hitting a bear market bottom on March 23, 2020, the broad-based<b>S&amp;P 500</b>has galloped higher by 87%, through this past weekend. This handily outpaces the average bounce-back rally from a bear-market bottom and leaves the historic average annual return for the benchmark index eating dust.</p>\n<p>Yet even at these lofty levels, Wall Street professionals see value. Based on the consensus one-year price targets of Wall Street analysts, five of the most populargrowth stocksoffer implied upside ranging from a low of 28% to as much as 56%.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d19c9dd5972bb303415e3fb9e20fb2d4\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>IMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES.</p>\n<p>Shopify: Implied upside of 31%</p>\n<p>First up is my absolute favorite software-as-a-service (SaaS) stock,<b>Shopify</b>(NYSE:SHOP). Even after gaining more than 1,000% over the past 3.5 years, Wall Street believes the company's stock offers an additional 31% upside to $1,434 a share over the next year.</p>\n<p>Shopify's operating model of providing cloud-based e-commerce solutions to (primarily) small businessescouldn't be in a better place at the moment. Although it was initially hit by the pandemic with virtually all other retail-oriented companies, it quickly became apparent that Shopify's e-commerce platform would be a logical beneficiary as businesses shifted course and pushed online. The result was a 96% increase in gross merchandise value (GMV) transacted across its platform in 2020 to $119.6 billion. Over the past six years, GMV has grown at a compound annual rate of 77.7%.</p>\n<p>What's made Shopify tick is both the discovery of the platform by new merchants and the ability to snag worthwhile deals with major retailers. The number of consumers using the platform increased by approximately 52% last year to 457 million. Meanwhile, itpartneredwith the likes of<b>Walmart</b>&nbsp;and<b>Pinterest</b>to streamline aspects of their online sales platforms.</p>\n<p>Shopify isn't remotely inexpensive on a fundamental basis. But if it can continue to grow its GMV at these insane levels, investors will gladly pay a hefty premium to own Shopify stock.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/df219df7b01fbc2aa008c455f28b99e5\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>IMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES.</p>\n<p>Teladoc Health: Implied upside of 40%</p>\n<p>Telemedicine giant<b>Teladoc Health</b>(NYSE:TDOC)has been exceptionally popular over the past year, for obvious reasons I'll touch on in a moment. According to Wall Street, shares of Teladoc could ascend past $250 over the next 12 months, giving it an implied upside of 40%.</p>\n<p>As you can imagine, physicians wanted to keep at-risk people and potentially infected patients out of offices and hospitals if at all possible last year. This led to Teladoc handling almost 10.6 million virtual visits in 2020, up from around 4.1 million in the previous year.</p>\n<p>But understand that telehealth is agame-changing healthcare modeland not just a one-year wonder because of the pandemic. It's far more convenient for patients, allows physicians to keep closer tabs on at-risk patients, and is usually billed at a lower rate than office visits, which health insurers love. These advantages are exactly why Teladoc's sales grew by an average annual rate of 74% between 2013 and 2019.</p>\n<p>Furthermore, Teladoc has a new toy, so to speak: Itacquired leading applied health signals company Livongo Healthin early November. Livongo leans on artificial intelligence to send tips and nudges to patients with chronic illnesses. These nudges help patients make behavioral changes that result in their leading healthier lives. The addition of Livongo makes Teladoc a veritable no-brainer buy.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0e47e6b6eced3a10e200ffd777619a0c\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"393\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>IMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES.</p>\n<p>Snowflake: Implied upside of 28%</p>\n<p>Another high-growth stock with abundant upside according to Wall Street professionals is cloud data warehousing company<b>Snowflake</b>(NYSE:SNOW). After recently retracing to an all-time low, analysts see Snowflake gaining up to 28% to almost $301 a share over the next 12 months.</p>\n<p>As I alluded to with Shopify, we're witnessing a big push by businesses online and into the cloud, which has been a boon for most cloud infrastructure companies. Despite the worst economic downturn in decades, Snowflake grew its product revenue by 120% to $553.8 million in fiscal 2021. Although it's losing a lot of money at the moment, the services Snowflake offers should yield juicy margins as the company matures.</p>\n<p>Arguably the most interesting thing about Snowflake is itssustainable competitive advantages. For instance, it offers a pay-as-you-go model that shuns the subscriptions that SaaS stocks often covet. By allowing its customers to pay based on their storage needs and Snowflake Compute Credits used, it's offering a highly transparent and cost-effective operating model.</p>\n<p>Even better, its platform islayered atop the most popular cloud infrastructure solutions, which makes the sharing of information seamless, regardless of storage provider.</p>\n<p>Snowflake has some very big shoes to fill with its lofty valuation, but Wall Street believes the company can get it done.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bbafad9e87b7b7dacfefe92d4741b655\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"393\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>IMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES.</p>\n<p>Datadog: Implied upside of 35%</p>\n<p>Have I mentioned that Wall Street has a thing forSaaS stocks? In addition to Shopify and Snowflake, analysts believe that application monitoring solutions provider<b>Datadog</b>(NASDAQ:DDOG)could surge to $121 a share over the next year. This implies up to 35% upside in its shares.</p>\n<p>Keeping with the theme, Datadog looks to benefit from businesses completely shifting their strategy in the wake of the pandemic. With employees working remotely, it's become more important than ever that businesses stay on top of key metrics, oversee critical applications, and fully understand the behavior of their customers. Datadog's cloud-based solutions do all of this for its clients.</p>\n<p>What's been most impressive about Datadog is the company's ability to attract bigger clients. While a 46% increase in customers with at least $100,000 in annual recurring revenue (ARR) is nice, the \"wow\" number is the 94% increase in the number of customers generating at least $1 million in ARR. This is a big reason the company's sales shot 66% higher in 2020 to $603.5 million.</p>\n<p>Similar to Snowflake, Datadog has a lot to prove with its lofty price-to-sales ratio. However, if it can continue to grow its sales by more than 30% annually, there'sno reason Wall Street's price target isn't within reach.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/99b3853458b2424e2901821012f5502f\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>IMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES.</p>\n<p>Coinbase: Implied upside of 56%</p>\n<p>Finally, recent initial public offering<b>Coinbase</b>(NASDAQ:COIN)offers the highest perceived upside among these five fast-growing companies. Though there were only four price targets listed through this past weekend, a lofty target of $600 a share skewed the consensus up to $456 a share. This suggests Coinbase could gain 56% over the coming 12 months.</p>\n<p>There's no doubt that Coinbase has benefited from the euphoria surrounding cryptocurrencies like<b>Bitcoin</b>and&nbsp;<b>Ethereum</b>. With both rallying to new highs this year, Coinbase recorded $1.8 billion in revenue in the first quarter. For some context, that's more revenue than it had generated in the previous 24 months combined!</p>\n<p>However, unlike the other popular companies listed here,Coinbase's advantages look flimsy, at best. It runs the risk of competing crypto brokerages undercutting its fees, which could reduce its operating margins and growth rate dramatically over time.</p>\n<p>Furthermore,its business model looks to be built upon euphoria&nbsp;rather than innovation. With most of its revenue coming from Bitcoin and Ethereum trading, it's worrisome to see what happens when the price of these key assets stops rising. In a two-year stretch where Bitcoin lost 80% of its value, Coinbase saw its revenue nearly get halved.</p>\n<p>In sum, Wall Street may be bullish on Coinbase, but this Fool isn't.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>5 Ultra-Popular Growth Stocks With 28% to 56% Upside, According to Wall Street</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n5 Ultra-Popular Growth Stocks With 28% to 56% Upside, According to Wall Street\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-04-28 19:07 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/04/28/5-growth-stocks-with-28-to-56-upside-wall-street/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>For 13 months, Wall Street has proved virtually unstoppable. Since hitting a bear market bottom on March 23, 2020, the broad-basedS&P 500has galloped higher by 87%, through this past weekend. This ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/04/28/5-growth-stocks-with-28-to-56-upside-wall-street/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"DDOG":"Datadog","TDOC":"Teladoc Health Inc.","SNOW":"Snowflake","SHOP":"Shopify Inc","COIN":"Coinbase Global, Inc."},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/04/28/5-growth-stocks-with-28-to-56-upside-wall-street/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1138128459","content_text":"For 13 months, Wall Street has proved virtually unstoppable. Since hitting a bear market bottom on March 23, 2020, the broad-basedS&P 500has galloped higher by 87%, through this past weekend. This handily outpaces the average bounce-back rally from a bear-market bottom and leaves the historic average annual return for the benchmark index eating dust.\nYet even at these lofty levels, Wall Street professionals see value. Based on the consensus one-year price targets of Wall Street analysts, five of the most populargrowth stocksoffer implied upside ranging from a low of 28% to as much as 56%.\n\nIMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES.\nShopify: Implied upside of 31%\nFirst up is my absolute favorite software-as-a-service (SaaS) stock,Shopify(NYSE:SHOP). Even after gaining more than 1,000% over the past 3.5 years, Wall Street believes the company's stock offers an additional 31% upside to $1,434 a share over the next year.\nShopify's operating model of providing cloud-based e-commerce solutions to (primarily) small businessescouldn't be in a better place at the moment. Although it was initially hit by the pandemic with virtually all other retail-oriented companies, it quickly became apparent that Shopify's e-commerce platform would be a logical beneficiary as businesses shifted course and pushed online. The result was a 96% increase in gross merchandise value (GMV) transacted across its platform in 2020 to $119.6 billion. Over the past six years, GMV has grown at a compound annual rate of 77.7%.\nWhat's made Shopify tick is both the discovery of the platform by new merchants and the ability to snag worthwhile deals with major retailers. The number of consumers using the platform increased by approximately 52% last year to 457 million. Meanwhile, itpartneredwith the likes ofWalmart andPinterestto streamline aspects of their online sales platforms.\nShopify isn't remotely inexpensive on a fundamental basis. But if it can continue to grow its GMV at these insane levels, investors will gladly pay a hefty premium to own Shopify stock.\n\nIMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES.\nTeladoc Health: Implied upside of 40%\nTelemedicine giantTeladoc Health(NYSE:TDOC)has been exceptionally popular over the past year, for obvious reasons I'll touch on in a moment. According to Wall Street, shares of Teladoc could ascend past $250 over the next 12 months, giving it an implied upside of 40%.\nAs you can imagine, physicians wanted to keep at-risk people and potentially infected patients out of offices and hospitals if at all possible last year. This led to Teladoc handling almost 10.6 million virtual visits in 2020, up from around 4.1 million in the previous year.\nBut understand that telehealth is agame-changing healthcare modeland not just a one-year wonder because of the pandemic. It's far more convenient for patients, allows physicians to keep closer tabs on at-risk patients, and is usually billed at a lower rate than office visits, which health insurers love. These advantages are exactly why Teladoc's sales grew by an average annual rate of 74% between 2013 and 2019.\nFurthermore, Teladoc has a new toy, so to speak: Itacquired leading applied health signals company Livongo Healthin early November. Livongo leans on artificial intelligence to send tips and nudges to patients with chronic illnesses. These nudges help patients make behavioral changes that result in their leading healthier lives. The addition of Livongo makes Teladoc a veritable no-brainer buy.\n\nIMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES.\nSnowflake: Implied upside of 28%\nAnother high-growth stock with abundant upside according to Wall Street professionals is cloud data warehousing companySnowflake(NYSE:SNOW). After recently retracing to an all-time low, analysts see Snowflake gaining up to 28% to almost $301 a share over the next 12 months.\nAs I alluded to with Shopify, we're witnessing a big push by businesses online and into the cloud, which has been a boon for most cloud infrastructure companies. Despite the worst economic downturn in decades, Snowflake grew its product revenue by 120% to $553.8 million in fiscal 2021. Although it's losing a lot of money at the moment, the services Snowflake offers should yield juicy margins as the company matures.\nArguably the most interesting thing about Snowflake is itssustainable competitive advantages. For instance, it offers a pay-as-you-go model that shuns the subscriptions that SaaS stocks often covet. By allowing its customers to pay based on their storage needs and Snowflake Compute Credits used, it's offering a highly transparent and cost-effective operating model.\nEven better, its platform islayered atop the most popular cloud infrastructure solutions, which makes the sharing of information seamless, regardless of storage provider.\nSnowflake has some very big shoes to fill with its lofty valuation, but Wall Street believes the company can get it done.\n\nIMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES.\nDatadog: Implied upside of 35%\nHave I mentioned that Wall Street has a thing forSaaS stocks? In addition to Shopify and Snowflake, analysts believe that application monitoring solutions providerDatadog(NASDAQ:DDOG)could surge to $121 a share over the next year. This implies up to 35% upside in its shares.\nKeeping with the theme, Datadog looks to benefit from businesses completely shifting their strategy in the wake of the pandemic. With employees working remotely, it's become more important than ever that businesses stay on top of key metrics, oversee critical applications, and fully understand the behavior of their customers. Datadog's cloud-based solutions do all of this for its clients.\nWhat's been most impressive about Datadog is the company's ability to attract bigger clients. While a 46% increase in customers with at least $100,000 in annual recurring revenue (ARR) is nice, the \"wow\" number is the 94% increase in the number of customers generating at least $1 million in ARR. This is a big reason the company's sales shot 66% higher in 2020 to $603.5 million.\nSimilar to Snowflake, Datadog has a lot to prove with its lofty price-to-sales ratio. However, if it can continue to grow its sales by more than 30% annually, there'sno reason Wall Street's price target isn't within reach.\n\nIMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES.\nCoinbase: Implied upside of 56%\nFinally, recent initial public offeringCoinbase(NASDAQ:COIN)offers the highest perceived upside among these five fast-growing companies. Though there were only four price targets listed through this past weekend, a lofty target of $600 a share skewed the consensus up to $456 a share. This suggests Coinbase could gain 56% over the coming 12 months.\nThere's no doubt that Coinbase has benefited from the euphoria surrounding cryptocurrencies likeBitcoinand Ethereum. With both rallying to new highs this year, Coinbase recorded $1.8 billion in revenue in the first quarter. For some context, that's more revenue than it had generated in the previous 24 months combined!\nHowever, unlike the other popular companies listed here,Coinbase's advantages look flimsy, at best. It runs the risk of competing crypto brokerages undercutting its fees, which could reduce its operating margins and growth rate dramatically over time.\nFurthermore,its business model looks to be built upon euphoria rather than innovation. With most of its revenue coming from Bitcoin and Ethereum trading, it's worrisome to see what happens when the price of these key assets stops rising. In a two-year stretch where Bitcoin lost 80% of its value, Coinbase saw its revenue nearly get halved.\nIn sum, Wall Street may be bullish on Coinbase, but this Fool isn't.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":255,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":377267069,"gmtCreate":1619531257151,"gmtModify":1704725514449,"author":{"id":"3576837088119232","authorId":"3576837088119232","authorIdStr":"3576837088119232","name":"文氏","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13ab58f27225c31b03dde6b684f98f7e","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576837088119232"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Upupup","listText":"Upupup","text":"Upupup","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/377267069","repostId":"1161810404","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1161810404","pubTimestamp":1619527994,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1161810404?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-04-27 20:53","market":"us","language":"en","title":"What's The Real Story Of Tesla In China?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1161810404","media":"ZeroHedge","summary":"What’s really going on for Tesla in China? Global supply chains remain fragile as the Chinese flex t","content":"<p><b><i>What’s really going on for Tesla in China? Global supply chains remain fragile as the Chinese flex their muscles and national buying power. That may prove problematic for western firms, and especially Tesla. But also it raises questions about investment imperatives on China growth vs flatline in the West.</i></b></p>\n<p>There is lots to be positive about this morning. The first headline to catch my eye was a prediction from Goldman Sachs raising their target to 7.8% UK growth in 2021 – up from the 5% consensus. Great stuff! A colleague sent me the FT’s analysis of the&nbsp;Pandemic end-game: 5.2% people have been infected last week, but vaccines are clearly working and saving lives. And there are some spectacular company results hitting the screens.</p>\n<p>But across the globe supply chain ructions continue. Jaguar Land Rover has shut down a number of factories over the global shortage of chips. There are warning of everything from autos, fridges, toasters to airplanes being delayed due to apparent hoarding by Chinese manufacturers concerned about possible sanctions if the current cold war heats up.</p>\n<ul>\n <li><p>We have a global explosion of repressed consumer spending set to hit the market.</p></li>\n <li><p>There is a global shortage of goods. (I know this – it looks like our new kitchen will have a wine-chiller shaped gap due to the lack of supply! Shocking…. Simply shocking…)</p></li>\n <li><p>There is the threat of further supply shocks on the back of rising trade and cold-war ructions.</p></li>\n</ul>\n<p><b>The world is less stable than we hope. And it boils down to a very simple question. What’s really happening in China?</b>That, I suspect, is the critical factor when it comes to predicting just how strong pandemic recovery will be, or how constrained it may become.</p>\n<p>I saw a headline flash by this morning anticipating Apple iPhone China sales fell in March as sales of new domestic smart-phones kicked in. According to&nbsp;Seeking Alpha&nbsp;high China sales in Jan/Feb have reversed despite the success of the new iPhone 12. (Apple numbers are tomorrow.) Why would China sales fall? Is it because Chinese consumers are increasingly persuaded to buy home-grown product, fuelled by a patriotic duty to do so?</p>\n<p><b>Tesla is finding itself on the receiving end of pointed official China criticism</b>– and Musk (surprisingly) has bowed his head and promised to do better. The headlines about a US Tesla crash where there is a dispute about whether anyone was actually driving is just noise and distraction. The real story is the future for Tesla demand in China.</p>\n<p>If Tesla was criticised in the US for shoddy servicing, poor customer care, and was accused of breaching privacy rules with car mounted cameras, you can bet Musk would be screaming obscenities, appearing on prime time TV smoking a joint to tell us regulators are idiots, and that the press knows nothing. Allegations of customer dissatisfaction would be steamrollered by a barrage of Tesla Fanboy hate posts and denials refusing to discuss the matter.</p>\n<p>But, when Tesla gets accused of the same failings in China – suddenly Musk does the right thing and kow-tows, promising to do better. Musk is beginning to understand that displaying “sincerity” in China means doing exactly what the state tells him to do.</p>\n<p><b>Tesla is walking a very thin line in China</b>– and Elon knows it. On one hand, he’s bet the shop on promises the EV maker will deliver big into China. On the other, the recent Shanghai Motor Show featured a couple of Teslas, but, more importantly, a vast number of sophisticated Chinese new models EVs set for launch in the coming year.</p>\n<p>Musk may soon realise the Chinese might just have played him for a chump – supporting and financing his gigafactory build to get EVs established in the Chinese consumer mindset, while also conclusively demonstrating to the Chinese autofirms the foreign rival products they have to beat.</p>\n<p>And since we’re talking about Tesla, let’s get off the China theme for a moment, and think about the results it announced y’day: Congratulations to them for beating Q1 expectations. Net income of $438mm, revenues up 74% and 185,000 cars delivered.</p>\n<p><i><b>But… all that glitters is not revenue from car sales… Let’s see… what did the results really tell us? That profit was based on $518 mm of regulatory credit sales and a $101 positive gain from its Bitcoin position and sales. Strip these out and… and Telsa lost $181mm selling cars.</b></i></p>\n<p>To this day I don’t believe Tesla has made a single brass cent selling cars, yet the purveyor of fine regulatory credits and dabbler in cryptocurrencies has made its owner the second richest man on the planet. (And yes.. I still hold a small position in the stock.)</p>\n<p>More importantly, the Q1 results show Musk is caught between the proverbial rock and river. He knows winning in China is critical for his evolved EV scheme.</p>\n<p><b>Ok – calling Tesla a pyramid scheme is harsh, but Musk knows he needs to keep up the positive news flow; continually demonstrating Telsa’s lead in EV, increasing his production numbers, upping the profits and feeding a never-ending stream of positive spin (like autonomous driving tomorrow – always tomorrow). Without the positive spin driving Tesla marketing and keeping up the stock-price, how will he continue to attract new buyers while persuading current investors to HODL! (Crypto-verse speak for “hold on for dear life”).</b></p>\n<p>There is a big missed theme around Tesla – competition.</p>\n<p><b>Their EV tech moat is shallow.</b>Today, the firm is still ahead in EV terms of consumer deliverables like quality, range, handling etc, but the rest of the Automotive world; from Tokyo to Munich, from Shanghai to Detroit is playing catch up fast.</p>\n<p><b>Going back to China, the party is very keen to see domestic producers not only dominated the China market, but to establish themselves abroad.</b>That’s as true in EVs as it will be in Smart-phones, fridges and all the other paraphernalia of modern life…</p>\n<p>Let, me stir this a bit more. Should you bite the moral bullet and buy HSBC? The potential downside is its engaging with China – but its China that makes the bank so valuable. HSBC is a good illustration of the China conundrum.</p>\n<p>The geopolitical tensions look high. There are few signs the US and China will reach anything better than a new cold war which is bound to further roil supply chains. There are a surprising number of articles around on how the newly empowered Chinese navy is set to take on American carrier task forces over Taiwan – and hammer them with land-based hyper-missiles. (None of this bodes well for the&nbsp;Big-Lizzie UK carrier strike group&nbsp;heading to the region this summer.)</p>\n<p>The moral arguments against any China investment can’t be ignored. The treatment of the Uyghurs, surveillance, Tibet and the rest are difficult to square with any ESG investment mandate.</p>\n<p>China critics will point to the case of Jack Ma and issues of the rule law as further reasons to remain shy of China investors. But its only by fully embracing capitalism and the market economy model – with Chinese Characteristics – the Chinese have been able to so successfully grow their economy and take it through its earlier export-led model to today’s consumption-led economy. The Chinese want their luxury and consumer goods, just like the rest of us.</p>\n<p>The next couple of months are going to be fascinated in terms of how the China story develops. Trade Wars, its own internal markets, Patriotic buying programmes, and Geopolitics will all feature. At this point, remember my mantra no 4:&nbsp;<b>“Things are seldom as bad as you fear, but never as good as you hope!”</b></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>What's The Real Story Of Tesla In China?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhat's The Real Story Of Tesla In China?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-04-27 20:53 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/whats-real-story-tesla-china><strong>ZeroHedge</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>What’s really going on for Tesla in China? Global supply chains remain fragile as the Chinese flex their muscles and national buying power. That may prove problematic for western firms, and especially...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/whats-real-story-tesla-china\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/whats-real-story-tesla-china","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1161810404","content_text":"What’s really going on for Tesla in China? Global supply chains remain fragile as the Chinese flex their muscles and national buying power. That may prove problematic for western firms, and especially Tesla. But also it raises questions about investment imperatives on China growth vs flatline in the West.\nThere is lots to be positive about this morning. The first headline to catch my eye was a prediction from Goldman Sachs raising their target to 7.8% UK growth in 2021 – up from the 5% consensus. Great stuff! A colleague sent me the FT’s analysis of the Pandemic end-game: 5.2% people have been infected last week, but vaccines are clearly working and saving lives. And there are some spectacular company results hitting the screens.\nBut across the globe supply chain ructions continue. Jaguar Land Rover has shut down a number of factories over the global shortage of chips. There are warning of everything from autos, fridges, toasters to airplanes being delayed due to apparent hoarding by Chinese manufacturers concerned about possible sanctions if the current cold war heats up.\n\nWe have a global explosion of repressed consumer spending set to hit the market.\nThere is a global shortage of goods. (I know this – it looks like our new kitchen will have a wine-chiller shaped gap due to the lack of supply! Shocking…. Simply shocking…)\nThere is the threat of further supply shocks on the back of rising trade and cold-war ructions.\n\nThe world is less stable than we hope. And it boils down to a very simple question. What’s really happening in China?That, I suspect, is the critical factor when it comes to predicting just how strong pandemic recovery will be, or how constrained it may become.\nI saw a headline flash by this morning anticipating Apple iPhone China sales fell in March as sales of new domestic smart-phones kicked in. According to Seeking Alpha high China sales in Jan/Feb have reversed despite the success of the new iPhone 12. (Apple numbers are tomorrow.) Why would China sales fall? Is it because Chinese consumers are increasingly persuaded to buy home-grown product, fuelled by a patriotic duty to do so?\nTesla is finding itself on the receiving end of pointed official China criticism– and Musk (surprisingly) has bowed his head and promised to do better. The headlines about a US Tesla crash where there is a dispute about whether anyone was actually driving is just noise and distraction. The real story is the future for Tesla demand in China.\nIf Tesla was criticised in the US for shoddy servicing, poor customer care, and was accused of breaching privacy rules with car mounted cameras, you can bet Musk would be screaming obscenities, appearing on prime time TV smoking a joint to tell us regulators are idiots, and that the press knows nothing. Allegations of customer dissatisfaction would be steamrollered by a barrage of Tesla Fanboy hate posts and denials refusing to discuss the matter.\nBut, when Tesla gets accused of the same failings in China – suddenly Musk does the right thing and kow-tows, promising to do better. Musk is beginning to understand that displaying “sincerity” in China means doing exactly what the state tells him to do.\nTesla is walking a very thin line in China– and Elon knows it. On one hand, he’s bet the shop on promises the EV maker will deliver big into China. On the other, the recent Shanghai Motor Show featured a couple of Teslas, but, more importantly, a vast number of sophisticated Chinese new models EVs set for launch in the coming year.\nMusk may soon realise the Chinese might just have played him for a chump – supporting and financing his gigafactory build to get EVs established in the Chinese consumer mindset, while also conclusively demonstrating to the Chinese autofirms the foreign rival products they have to beat.\nAnd since we’re talking about Tesla, let’s get off the China theme for a moment, and think about the results it announced y’day: Congratulations to them for beating Q1 expectations. Net income of $438mm, revenues up 74% and 185,000 cars delivered.\nBut… all that glitters is not revenue from car sales… Let’s see… what did the results really tell us? That profit was based on $518 mm of regulatory credit sales and a $101 positive gain from its Bitcoin position and sales. Strip these out and… and Telsa lost $181mm selling cars.\nTo this day I don’t believe Tesla has made a single brass cent selling cars, yet the purveyor of fine regulatory credits and dabbler in cryptocurrencies has made its owner the second richest man on the planet. (And yes.. I still hold a small position in the stock.)\nMore importantly, the Q1 results show Musk is caught between the proverbial rock and river. He knows winning in China is critical for his evolved EV scheme.\nOk – calling Tesla a pyramid scheme is harsh, but Musk knows he needs to keep up the positive news flow; continually demonstrating Telsa’s lead in EV, increasing his production numbers, upping the profits and feeding a never-ending stream of positive spin (like autonomous driving tomorrow – always tomorrow). Without the positive spin driving Tesla marketing and keeping up the stock-price, how will he continue to attract new buyers while persuading current investors to HODL! (Crypto-verse speak for “hold on for dear life”).\nThere is a big missed theme around Tesla – competition.\nTheir EV tech moat is shallow.Today, the firm is still ahead in EV terms of consumer deliverables like quality, range, handling etc, but the rest of the Automotive world; from Tokyo to Munich, from Shanghai to Detroit is playing catch up fast.\nGoing back to China, the party is very keen to see domestic producers not only dominated the China market, but to establish themselves abroad.That’s as true in EVs as it will be in Smart-phones, fridges and all the other paraphernalia of modern life…\nLet, me stir this a bit more. Should you bite the moral bullet and buy HSBC? The potential downside is its engaging with China – but its China that makes the bank so valuable. HSBC is a good illustration of the China conundrum.\nThe geopolitical tensions look high. There are few signs the US and China will reach anything better than a new cold war which is bound to further roil supply chains. There are a surprising number of articles around on how the newly empowered Chinese navy is set to take on American carrier task forces over Taiwan – and hammer them with land-based hyper-missiles. (None of this bodes well for the Big-Lizzie UK carrier strike group heading to the region this summer.)\nThe moral arguments against any China investment can’t be ignored. The treatment of the Uyghurs, surveillance, Tibet and the rest are difficult to square with any ESG investment mandate.\nChina critics will point to the case of Jack Ma and issues of the rule law as further reasons to remain shy of China investors. But its only by fully embracing capitalism and the market economy model – with Chinese Characteristics – the Chinese have been able to so successfully grow their economy and take it through its earlier export-led model to today’s consumption-led economy. The Chinese want their luxury and consumer goods, just like the rest of us.\nThe next couple of months are going to be fascinated in terms of how the China story develops. Trade Wars, its own internal markets, Patriotic buying programmes, and Geopolitics will all feature. At this point, remember my mantra no 4: “Things are seldom as bad as you fear, but never as good as you hope!”","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":138,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":374256201,"gmtCreate":1619450497703,"gmtModify":1704724147464,"author":{"id":"3576837088119232","authorId":"3576837088119232","authorIdStr":"3576837088119232","name":"文氏","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13ab58f27225c31b03dde6b684f98f7e","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576837088119232"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"When should I buy? Issit too late now????","listText":"When should I buy? Issit too late now????","text":"When should I buy? Issit too late now????","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/374256201","repostId":"2130364766","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":172,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":376892382,"gmtCreate":1619101460146,"gmtModify":1704719691412,"author":{"id":"3576837088119232","authorId":"3576837088119232","authorIdStr":"3576837088119232","name":"文氏","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13ab58f27225c31b03dde6b684f98f7e","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576837088119232"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ohhh good explanation&nbsp;","listText":"Ohhh good explanation&nbsp;","text":"Ohhh good explanation","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/376892382","repostId":"1172040780","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1172040780","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Stock Market Quotes, Business News, Financial News, Trading Ideas, and Stock Research by Professionals","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Benzinga","id":"1052270027","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa"},"pubTimestamp":1619096972,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1172040780?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-04-22 21:09","market":"us","language":"en","title":"3 EV Stocks That Are At Important Support Levels And Could Rebound","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1172040780","media":"Benzinga","summary":"Electric vehicle companies NIO Inc. ,Tesla,Inc. , and Nikola Corporation  are all trading close to support. This means there is a good chance they rally.Support is a concentration of buyers who have gathered at the same price level. At support levels, there is more demand for the stock than there is supply. Sellers can sell all they need to with no fear of pushing the price lower.Sometimes, stocks rally after they fall to support. This happens when some of the market participants decide to pay h","content":"<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c1474f81bdbd94c87c3c2fd7c6b2c663\" tg-width=\"1200\" tg-height=\"630\"></p>\n<p>Electric vehicle companies&nbsp;<b>NIO Inc.</b>&nbsp;(NYSE:NIO),<b>Tesla</b>,<b>Inc.</b>&nbsp;(NASDAQ:TSLA), and&nbsp;<b>Nikola Corporation</b>&nbsp;(NASDAQ:NKLA) are all trading close to support. This means there is a good chance they rally.</p>\n<p>Support is a concentration of buyers who have gathered at the same price level. At support levels, there is more demand for the stock than there is supply. Sellers can sell all they need to with no fear of pushing the price lower.</p>\n<p>Downtrends end when they reach support levels.</p>\n<p>Sometimes, stocks rally after they fall to support. This happens when some of the market participants decide to pay higher prices. These investors think the large buyers who created the support will eventually drive the stock higher. They want to get ahead of them.</p>\n<p>Nio has held support around the $35 level. It also reached this level in early and mid-March. Both times, a small rebound followed and that could happen again.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0f08d2b7d5a4ce9f09e0f8a96d111469\" tg-width=\"1528\" tg-height=\"816\"></p>\n<p>Tesla has held support around the $700 level. There is support at $700 because it was a resistance level and levels that were resistance can turn into support.</p>\n<p>This happens because many of the investors who sold their shares at $700 believe they made a mistake when the shares traded higher afterward. A number of these investors decide to buy the stock back, but they will only do so if they can get it for the same price they sold at.</p>\n<p>As a result, buy orders are placed at a level that had been resistance, which&nbsp;will create support. If there are enough of these buy orders, the level will turn into a support level. That’s the case here.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/16bc657cff0abad9f5cbacb644ad799c\" tg-width=\"1519\" tg-height=\"821\"></p>\n<p>Shares of Nikola have come full circle.</p>\n<p>Last April, they were trading around $10 and&nbsp;soared to more than $90 in June.&nbsp;Since then, the stock has&nbsp;trended lower and is&nbsp;trading at $10 once again.</p>\n<p>There’s support at $10 because investors like to place their orders at even numbers. After the steep decline, there's a chance&nbsp;shares stage some type of rebound.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4eac22ac2bd93e4ebad3120cc1f95348\" tg-width=\"1526\" tg-height=\"812\"></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>3 EV Stocks That Are At Important Support Levels And Could Rebound</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n3 EV Stocks That Are At Important Support Levels And Could Rebound\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Benzinga </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-04-22 21:09</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c1474f81bdbd94c87c3c2fd7c6b2c663\" tg-width=\"1200\" tg-height=\"630\"></p>\n<p>Electric vehicle companies&nbsp;<b>NIO Inc.</b>&nbsp;(NYSE:NIO),<b>Tesla</b>,<b>Inc.</b>&nbsp;(NASDAQ:TSLA), and&nbsp;<b>Nikola Corporation</b>&nbsp;(NASDAQ:NKLA) are all trading close to support. This means there is a good chance they rally.</p>\n<p>Support is a concentration of buyers who have gathered at the same price level. At support levels, there is more demand for the stock than there is supply. Sellers can sell all they need to with no fear of pushing the price lower.</p>\n<p>Downtrends end when they reach support levels.</p>\n<p>Sometimes, stocks rally after they fall to support. This happens when some of the market participants decide to pay higher prices. These investors think the large buyers who created the support will eventually drive the stock higher. They want to get ahead of them.</p>\n<p>Nio has held support around the $35 level. It also reached this level in early and mid-March. Both times, a small rebound followed and that could happen again.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0f08d2b7d5a4ce9f09e0f8a96d111469\" tg-width=\"1528\" tg-height=\"816\"></p>\n<p>Tesla has held support around the $700 level. There is support at $700 because it was a resistance level and levels that were resistance can turn into support.</p>\n<p>This happens because many of the investors who sold their shares at $700 believe they made a mistake when the shares traded higher afterward. A number of these investors decide to buy the stock back, but they will only do so if they can get it for the same price they sold at.</p>\n<p>As a result, buy orders are placed at a level that had been resistance, which&nbsp;will create support. If there are enough of these buy orders, the level will turn into a support level. That’s the case here.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/16bc657cff0abad9f5cbacb644ad799c\" tg-width=\"1519\" tg-height=\"821\"></p>\n<p>Shares of Nikola have come full circle.</p>\n<p>Last April, they were trading around $10 and&nbsp;soared to more than $90 in June.&nbsp;Since then, the stock has&nbsp;trended lower and is&nbsp;trading at $10 once again.</p>\n<p>There’s support at $10 because investors like to place their orders at even numbers. After the steep decline, there's a chance&nbsp;shares stage some type of rebound.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4eac22ac2bd93e4ebad3120cc1f95348\" tg-width=\"1526\" tg-height=\"812\"></p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NIO":"蔚来","NKLA":"Nikola Corporation","TSLA":"特斯拉"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1172040780","content_text":"Electric vehicle companies NIO Inc. (NYSE:NIO),Tesla,Inc. (NASDAQ:TSLA), and Nikola Corporation (NASDAQ:NKLA) are all trading close to support. This means there is a good chance they rally.\nSupport is a concentration of buyers who have gathered at the same price level. At support levels, there is more demand for the stock than there is supply. Sellers can sell all they need to with no fear of pushing the price lower.\nDowntrends end when they reach support levels.\nSometimes, stocks rally after they fall to support. This happens when some of the market participants decide to pay higher prices. These investors think the large buyers who created the support will eventually drive the stock higher. They want to get ahead of them.\nNio has held support around the $35 level. It also reached this level in early and mid-March. Both times, a small rebound followed and that could happen again.\n\nTesla has held support around the $700 level. There is support at $700 because it was a resistance level and levels that were resistance can turn into support.\nThis happens because many of the investors who sold their shares at $700 believe they made a mistake when the shares traded higher afterward. A number of these investors decide to buy the stock back, but they will only do so if they can get it for the same price they sold at.\nAs a result, buy orders are placed at a level that had been resistance, which will create support. If there are enough of these buy orders, the level will turn into a support level. That’s the case here.\n\nShares of Nikola have come full circle.\nLast April, they were trading around $10 and soared to more than $90 in June. Since then, the stock has trended lower and is trading at $10 once again.\nThere’s support at $10 because investors like to place their orders at even numbers. After the steep decline, there's a chance shares stage some type of rebound.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":307,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[{"author":{"id":"3579733246085840","authorId":"3579733246085840","authorIdStr":"3579733246085840","name":"wallflowere","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a5072464fdb4037d83d403dc2e80c19c","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3579733246085840"},"content":"which one will u invest in? I'm vested in tsla","text":"which one will u invest in? I'm vested in tsla","html":"which one will u invest in? I'm vested in tsla"}],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":378383719,"gmtCreate":1619001087431,"gmtModify":1704718100269,"author":{"id":"3576837088119232","authorId":"3576837088119232","authorIdStr":"3576837088119232","name":"文氏","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13ab58f27225c31b03dde6b684f98f7e","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576837088119232"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Didn't manage to sell in time =(","listText":"Didn't manage to sell in time =(","text":"Didn't manage to sell in time =(","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/378383719","repostId":"1131238315","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1131238315","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1618992068,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1131238315?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-04-21 16:01","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Netflix shares tumbled more than 8% in premarket trading","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1131238315","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Netflix Inc said slower production of TV shows and movies during the pandemic hurt subscriber growth","content":"<p>Netflix Inc&nbsp;said slower production of TV shows and movies during the pandemic hurt subscriber growth in the first quarter, sending shares of the world's largest streaming service down 8% in Wednesday&nbsp;premarket trading.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5a93bcc114bbf3391d2ddf1fcbecc2b9\" tg-width=\"1302\" tg-height=\"833\"></p>\n<p>Roughly 3.98 million people signed up for Netflix from January through March, below the 6.25 million average projection of analysts surveyed by Refinitiv.</p>\n<p>Netflix estimated it will add just 1 million new streaming customers in the second quarter. Analysts had expected a forecast of nearly 4.8 million.</p>\n<p>Shares of Netflix sunk 11% in after-hours trading to $489.28, wiping $25 billion off the company's market capitalization. Its stock has risen 27% over the past 12 months compared with a 63% increase in the tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite Index(.IXIC).</p>\n<p>Netflix said it did not believe competition changed materially in the quarter or impacted its new sign-ups \"as the over-forecast was across all of our regions.\"</p>\n<p>The company projected membership growth would accelerate in the second half of the year when it releases new seasons of \"You,\" \"Money Heist,\" and \"The Witcher\" and action movie \"Red Notice,\" among other titles.</p>\n<p>A year ago, Netflix added a record 15.8 million customers as the pandemic forced people around the world to stay home. The company said on Tuesday the pandemic hindered filming new shows.</p>\n<p>\"These dynamics are also contributing to a lighter content slate in the first half of 2021, and hence, we believe slower membership growth,\" the company said in its quarterly letter to shareholders.</p>\n<p>Analysts project people will spend less time streaming from their living rooms as COVID-19 vaccinations spread and more people emerge from their homes.</p>\n<p>Rival media companies have declared streaming their priority and are spending billions to compete with Netflix. Walt Disney Co's(DIS.N)Disney+ crossed 100 million subscribers in March. Netflix's total streaming customers stood at 207.6 million at the end of March.</p>\n<p>Netflix's share of new U.S. subscribers fell to 8.5% during the quarter, down from 16.2% the same period a year ago, according to Kantar Media.</p>\n<p>During the quarter, Netflix lost one of its most popular titles when workplace comedy \"The Office\" moved to Comcast Corp(CMCSA.O)streaming service Peacock.</p>\n<p>Netflix also raised its monthly rates in Britain, Germany, Argentina and Japan during the quarter.</p>\n<p>New customers totaled 1.8 million in Europe, 1.36 million in Asia and 360,000 in Latin America.</p>\n<p>\"What wasn't expected was the strength of the slowdown in international markets, where competition is significantly lower,\" said eMarketer analyst Eric Haggstrom.</p>\n<p>Excluding items, the company earned $3.75 per share in the first quarter, beating analyst estimates of $2.97 per share.</p>\n<p>Revenue rose to $7.16 billion from $5.77 billion during the quarter, edging past estimates of $7.13 billion.</p>\n<p>Net income rose to $1.71 billion, or $3.75 per share, from $709 million, or $1.57 per share, a year earlier.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Netflix shares tumbled more than 8% in premarket trading</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nNetflix shares tumbled more than 8% in premarket trading\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-04-21 16:01</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Netflix Inc&nbsp;said slower production of TV shows and movies during the pandemic hurt subscriber growth in the first quarter, sending shares of the world's largest streaming service down 8% in Wednesday&nbsp;premarket trading.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5a93bcc114bbf3391d2ddf1fcbecc2b9\" tg-width=\"1302\" tg-height=\"833\"></p>\n<p>Roughly 3.98 million people signed up for Netflix from January through March, below the 6.25 million average projection of analysts surveyed by Refinitiv.</p>\n<p>Netflix estimated it will add just 1 million new streaming customers in the second quarter. Analysts had expected a forecast of nearly 4.8 million.</p>\n<p>Shares of Netflix sunk 11% in after-hours trading to $489.28, wiping $25 billion off the company's market capitalization. Its stock has risen 27% over the past 12 months compared with a 63% increase in the tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite Index(.IXIC).</p>\n<p>Netflix said it did not believe competition changed materially in the quarter or impacted its new sign-ups \"as the over-forecast was across all of our regions.\"</p>\n<p>The company projected membership growth would accelerate in the second half of the year when it releases new seasons of \"You,\" \"Money Heist,\" and \"The Witcher\" and action movie \"Red Notice,\" among other titles.</p>\n<p>A year ago, Netflix added a record 15.8 million customers as the pandemic forced people around the world to stay home. The company said on Tuesday the pandemic hindered filming new shows.</p>\n<p>\"These dynamics are also contributing to a lighter content slate in the first half of 2021, and hence, we believe slower membership growth,\" the company said in its quarterly letter to shareholders.</p>\n<p>Analysts project people will spend less time streaming from their living rooms as COVID-19 vaccinations spread and more people emerge from their homes.</p>\n<p>Rival media companies have declared streaming their priority and are spending billions to compete with Netflix. Walt Disney Co's(DIS.N)Disney+ crossed 100 million subscribers in March. Netflix's total streaming customers stood at 207.6 million at the end of March.</p>\n<p>Netflix's share of new U.S. subscribers fell to 8.5% during the quarter, down from 16.2% the same period a year ago, according to Kantar Media.</p>\n<p>During the quarter, Netflix lost one of its most popular titles when workplace comedy \"The Office\" moved to Comcast Corp(CMCSA.O)streaming service Peacock.</p>\n<p>Netflix also raised its monthly rates in Britain, Germany, Argentina and Japan during the quarter.</p>\n<p>New customers totaled 1.8 million in Europe, 1.36 million in Asia and 360,000 in Latin America.</p>\n<p>\"What wasn't expected was the strength of the slowdown in international markets, where competition is significantly lower,\" said eMarketer analyst Eric Haggstrom.</p>\n<p>Excluding items, the company earned $3.75 per share in the first quarter, beating analyst estimates of $2.97 per share.</p>\n<p>Revenue rose to $7.16 billion from $5.77 billion during the quarter, edging past estimates of $7.13 billion.</p>\n<p>Net income rose to $1.71 billion, or $3.75 per share, from $709 million, or $1.57 per share, a year earlier.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NFLX":"奈飞"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1131238315","content_text":"Netflix Inc said slower production of TV shows and movies during the pandemic hurt subscriber growth in the first quarter, sending shares of the world's largest streaming service down 8% in Wednesday premarket trading.\n\nRoughly 3.98 million people signed up for Netflix from January through March, below the 6.25 million average projection of analysts surveyed by Refinitiv.\nNetflix estimated it will add just 1 million new streaming customers in the second quarter. Analysts had expected a forecast of nearly 4.8 million.\nShares of Netflix sunk 11% in after-hours trading to $489.28, wiping $25 billion off the company's market capitalization. Its stock has risen 27% over the past 12 months compared with a 63% increase in the tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite Index(.IXIC).\nNetflix said it did not believe competition changed materially in the quarter or impacted its new sign-ups \"as the over-forecast was across all of our regions.\"\nThe company projected membership growth would accelerate in the second half of the year when it releases new seasons of \"You,\" \"Money Heist,\" and \"The Witcher\" and action movie \"Red Notice,\" among other titles.\nA year ago, Netflix added a record 15.8 million customers as the pandemic forced people around the world to stay home. The company said on Tuesday the pandemic hindered filming new shows.\n\"These dynamics are also contributing to a lighter content slate in the first half of 2021, and hence, we believe slower membership growth,\" the company said in its quarterly letter to shareholders.\nAnalysts project people will spend less time streaming from their living rooms as COVID-19 vaccinations spread and more people emerge from their homes.\nRival media companies have declared streaming their priority and are spending billions to compete with Netflix. Walt Disney Co's(DIS.N)Disney+ crossed 100 million subscribers in March. Netflix's total streaming customers stood at 207.6 million at the end of March.\nNetflix's share of new U.S. subscribers fell to 8.5% during the quarter, down from 16.2% the same period a year ago, according to Kantar Media.\nDuring the quarter, Netflix lost one of its most popular titles when workplace comedy \"The Office\" moved to Comcast Corp(CMCSA.O)streaming service Peacock.\nNetflix also raised its monthly rates in Britain, Germany, Argentina and Japan during the quarter.\nNew customers totaled 1.8 million in Europe, 1.36 million in Asia and 360,000 in Latin America.\n\"What wasn't expected was the strength of the slowdown in international markets, where competition is significantly lower,\" said eMarketer analyst Eric Haggstrom.\nExcluding items, the company earned $3.75 per share in the first quarter, beating analyst estimates of $2.97 per share.\nRevenue rose to $7.16 billion from $5.77 billion during the quarter, edging past estimates of $7.13 billion.\nNet income rose to $1.71 billion, or $3.75 per share, from $709 million, or $1.57 per share, a year earlier.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":240,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":344162439,"gmtCreate":1618388733521,"gmtModify":1704710032296,"author":{"id":"3576837088119232","authorId":"3576837088119232","authorIdStr":"3576837088119232","name":"文氏","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13ab58f27225c31b03dde6b684f98f7e","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576837088119232"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Slightly confusing how this works!","listText":"Slightly confusing how this works!","text":"Slightly confusing how this works!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/344162439","repostId":"2127461210","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2127461210","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1618381800,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2127461210?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-04-14 14:30","market":"hk","language":"en","title":"5 things to watch out for before you invest in SPACs","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2127461210","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"Similarities to the dot.com and subprime bubbles are unmistakable.\n\nThe world's financial exchanges ","content":"<blockquote>\n Similarities to the dot.com and subprime bubbles are unmistakable.\n</blockquote>\n<p>The world's financial exchanges are now in gold-rush mode for IPO listings spurred on by the resurgence of the blank-check company. Now called a SPAC (for special purpose acquisition company), this is rapidly turning into an exercise in financial contagion as <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE\">one</a> global exchange after another contemplates getting in on the action and retail investors look to buy in.</p>\n<p>In 2020 SPACs accounted for more than half of all IPO proceeds raised in the U.S., and just in the month of January 2021 alone, more than 60 SPACS raised nearly $20 billion in proceeds. Meanwhile, the Singapore Exchange Ltd. Is said to be considering new rules that would allow blank-check companies to list sometime later this year. Likewise, the SPAC boom has caught the eye of U.K. exchanges also looking for ways to increase their participation in the listing phenomenon.</p>\n<p>The glaring investor protection issues that are endemic with these listings has CFA Institute on alert. The similarities to the dot.com and subprime bubbles are unmistakable. We think the SEC should immediately establish a working group to examine the marketing, shareholder rights, and investor protections issues involved. Investors considering SPACs need to remember that much can go wrong. Here are five important things retail investors need to know before taking the SPAC plunge:</p>\n<p>1. Blank-check alert: You are giving a SPAC sponsor money with no definite plan on if, when, or how the money will be used to acquire an operating company. You are being told as a retail investor that this is your big chance to get in early. But the sponsor can be as vague as simply saying, \"I have expertise in this industry and will be looking for a promising company with upside potential in this space.\" The potential for misinformation, even fraud, is high in these situations.</p>\n<p>2. The 18-month rule: The sponsor has between 18- and 24 months to locate, negotiate and close an acquisition deal, or they are required to give the SPAC IPO money back, plus interest. Sounds great, but if the SPAC stock you bought is trading based on rumor, innuendo, and no fundamentals before any acquisition happens, you likely paid a premium for it. The money-back rule only applies when there is no deal, and the refund is at the original IPO offering price, typically $10 per share plus interest, not what an investor paid for it in the open market. Moreover, the rate of \"no acquisition\" or lousy acquisition outcomes will likely grow. An increasing probability exists that your blank check \"investment\" will leave you poorer.</p>\n<p>3. Competition for private deals: No matter what the SPAC sponsor tells you , the competition to find a diamond-in-the-rough private company to acquire and take public remains intense. Not only are there hundreds of other SPACs looking for a target, but thousands of expert private equity managers with huge portfolios and lots of dry powder -- an estimated $1.5 trillion in private equity and venture capital funds -- are looking for the very same thing, and they have much longer track records. The odds of a SPAC sponsor finding a suitable, undiscovered gem that is fairly priced and ultimately profitable are mixed at best.</p>\n<p>4. Understand your piece of the SPAC pie: You must understand that even if a target acquisition is made, the amount of the new public company value that ends up in the hands of the SPAC stock buyers can be dreadfully meager. Your slice of the pie comes after the sponsor cut, the acquired company management's cut, and typically another private investor that tops off the capital needed to close the deal. It is not uncommon for the SPAC investors to end up fighting for scraps.</p>\n<p>5. Track record: Take the time to know if the sponsor has any track record in picking private investments. The only way private equity works in the real world of investment management is to find a private equity manager with a demonstrated record of making profitable deals. Picking a SPAC sponsor because they are linked with some sort of celebrity -- but with no real private equity chops -- represents the worst kind of blank check you could ever write.</p>\n<p>Margaret Franklin, CFA, is president and CEO of CFA Institute.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>5 things to watch out for before you invest in SPACs</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n5 things to watch out for before you invest in SPACs\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-04-14 14:30</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<blockquote>\n Similarities to the dot.com and subprime bubbles are unmistakable.\n</blockquote>\n<p>The world's financial exchanges are now in gold-rush mode for IPO listings spurred on by the resurgence of the blank-check company. Now called a SPAC (for special purpose acquisition company), this is rapidly turning into an exercise in financial contagion as <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE\">one</a> global exchange after another contemplates getting in on the action and retail investors look to buy in.</p>\n<p>In 2020 SPACs accounted for more than half of all IPO proceeds raised in the U.S., and just in the month of January 2021 alone, more than 60 SPACS raised nearly $20 billion in proceeds. Meanwhile, the Singapore Exchange Ltd. Is said to be considering new rules that would allow blank-check companies to list sometime later this year. Likewise, the SPAC boom has caught the eye of U.K. exchanges also looking for ways to increase their participation in the listing phenomenon.</p>\n<p>The glaring investor protection issues that are endemic with these listings has CFA Institute on alert. The similarities to the dot.com and subprime bubbles are unmistakable. We think the SEC should immediately establish a working group to examine the marketing, shareholder rights, and investor protections issues involved. Investors considering SPACs need to remember that much can go wrong. Here are five important things retail investors need to know before taking the SPAC plunge:</p>\n<p>1. Blank-check alert: You are giving a SPAC sponsor money with no definite plan on if, when, or how the money will be used to acquire an operating company. You are being told as a retail investor that this is your big chance to get in early. But the sponsor can be as vague as simply saying, \"I have expertise in this industry and will be looking for a promising company with upside potential in this space.\" The potential for misinformation, even fraud, is high in these situations.</p>\n<p>2. The 18-month rule: The sponsor has between 18- and 24 months to locate, negotiate and close an acquisition deal, or they are required to give the SPAC IPO money back, plus interest. Sounds great, but if the SPAC stock you bought is trading based on rumor, innuendo, and no fundamentals before any acquisition happens, you likely paid a premium for it. The money-back rule only applies when there is no deal, and the refund is at the original IPO offering price, typically $10 per share plus interest, not what an investor paid for it in the open market. Moreover, the rate of \"no acquisition\" or lousy acquisition outcomes will likely grow. An increasing probability exists that your blank check \"investment\" will leave you poorer.</p>\n<p>3. Competition for private deals: No matter what the SPAC sponsor tells you , the competition to find a diamond-in-the-rough private company to acquire and take public remains intense. Not only are there hundreds of other SPACs looking for a target, but thousands of expert private equity managers with huge portfolios and lots of dry powder -- an estimated $1.5 trillion in private equity and venture capital funds -- are looking for the very same thing, and they have much longer track records. The odds of a SPAC sponsor finding a suitable, undiscovered gem that is fairly priced and ultimately profitable are mixed at best.</p>\n<p>4. Understand your piece of the SPAC pie: You must understand that even if a target acquisition is made, the amount of the new public company value that ends up in the hands of the SPAC stock buyers can be dreadfully meager. Your slice of the pie comes after the sponsor cut, the acquired company management's cut, and typically another private investor that tops off the capital needed to close the deal. It is not uncommon for the SPAC investors to end up fighting for scraps.</p>\n<p>5. Track record: Take the time to know if the sponsor has any track record in picking private investments. The only way private equity works in the real world of investment management is to find a private equity manager with a demonstrated record of making profitable deals. Picking a SPAC sponsor because they are linked with some sort of celebrity -- but with no real private equity chops -- represents the worst kind of blank check you could ever write.</p>\n<p>Margaret Franklin, CFA, is president and CEO of CFA Institute.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2127461210","content_text":"Similarities to the dot.com and subprime bubbles are unmistakable.\n\nThe world's financial exchanges are now in gold-rush mode for IPO listings spurred on by the resurgence of the blank-check company. Now called a SPAC (for special purpose acquisition company), this is rapidly turning into an exercise in financial contagion as one global exchange after another contemplates getting in on the action and retail investors look to buy in.\nIn 2020 SPACs accounted for more than half of all IPO proceeds raised in the U.S., and just in the month of January 2021 alone, more than 60 SPACS raised nearly $20 billion in proceeds. Meanwhile, the Singapore Exchange Ltd. Is said to be considering new rules that would allow blank-check companies to list sometime later this year. Likewise, the SPAC boom has caught the eye of U.K. exchanges also looking for ways to increase their participation in the listing phenomenon.\nThe glaring investor protection issues that are endemic with these listings has CFA Institute on alert. The similarities to the dot.com and subprime bubbles are unmistakable. We think the SEC should immediately establish a working group to examine the marketing, shareholder rights, and investor protections issues involved. Investors considering SPACs need to remember that much can go wrong. Here are five important things retail investors need to know before taking the SPAC plunge:\n1. Blank-check alert: You are giving a SPAC sponsor money with no definite plan on if, when, or how the money will be used to acquire an operating company. You are being told as a retail investor that this is your big chance to get in early. But the sponsor can be as vague as simply saying, \"I have expertise in this industry and will be looking for a promising company with upside potential in this space.\" The potential for misinformation, even fraud, is high in these situations.\n2. The 18-month rule: The sponsor has between 18- and 24 months to locate, negotiate and close an acquisition deal, or they are required to give the SPAC IPO money back, plus interest. Sounds great, but if the SPAC stock you bought is trading based on rumor, innuendo, and no fundamentals before any acquisition happens, you likely paid a premium for it. The money-back rule only applies when there is no deal, and the refund is at the original IPO offering price, typically $10 per share plus interest, not what an investor paid for it in the open market. Moreover, the rate of \"no acquisition\" or lousy acquisition outcomes will likely grow. An increasing probability exists that your blank check \"investment\" will leave you poorer.\n3. Competition for private deals: No matter what the SPAC sponsor tells you , the competition to find a diamond-in-the-rough private company to acquire and take public remains intense. Not only are there hundreds of other SPACs looking for a target, but thousands of expert private equity managers with huge portfolios and lots of dry powder -- an estimated $1.5 trillion in private equity and venture capital funds -- are looking for the very same thing, and they have much longer track records. The odds of a SPAC sponsor finding a suitable, undiscovered gem that is fairly priced and ultimately profitable are mixed at best.\n4. Understand your piece of the SPAC pie: You must understand that even if a target acquisition is made, the amount of the new public company value that ends up in the hands of the SPAC stock buyers can be dreadfully meager. Your slice of the pie comes after the sponsor cut, the acquired company management's cut, and typically another private investor that tops off the capital needed to close the deal. It is not uncommon for the SPAC investors to end up fighting for scraps.\n5. Track record: Take the time to know if the sponsor has any track record in picking private investments. The only way private equity works in the real world of investment management is to find a private equity manager with a demonstrated record of making profitable deals. Picking a SPAC sponsor because they are linked with some sort of celebrity -- but with no real private equity chops -- represents the worst kind of blank check you could ever write.\nMargaret Franklin, CFA, is president and CEO of CFA Institute.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":163,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":348155095,"gmtCreate":1617896179017,"gmtModify":1704704598269,"author":{"id":"3576837088119232","authorId":"3576837088119232","authorIdStr":"3576837088119232","name":"文氏","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13ab58f27225c31b03dde6b684f98f7e","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576837088119232"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SPOT\">$Spotify Technology S.A.(SPOT)$</a>went in too early, before the adjustments..=(","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SPOT\">$Spotify Technology S.A.(SPOT)$</a>went in too early, before the adjustments..=(","text":"$Spotify Technology S.A.(SPOT)$went in too early, before the adjustments..=(","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/348155095","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":273,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":341899511,"gmtCreate":1617800439733,"gmtModify":1704703286304,"author":{"id":"3576837088119232","authorId":"3576837088119232","authorIdStr":"3576837088119232","name":"文氏","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13ab58f27225c31b03dde6b684f98f7e","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576837088119232"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Yay!","listText":"Yay!","text":"Yay!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/341899511","repostId":"1199135554","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1199135554","pubTimestamp":1617799435,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1199135554?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-04-07 20:43","market":"us","language":"en","title":"GameStop's Brilliant First Step","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1199135554","media":"seekingalpha","summary":"Summary\n\nGameStop's shares are significantly overvalued at this point in time.\nHowever, management i","content":"<p><b>Summary</b></p>\n<ul>\n <li>GameStop's shares are significantly overvalued at this point in time.</li>\n <li>However, management is finally taking advantage of this fact by issuing new shares.</li>\n <li>This is a great first step that was accompanied by strong sales data, but it's not aggressive enough to preserve the firm's value.</li>\n</ul>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1f963c480ab9aca8a75f578a9d705bd7\" tg-width=\"1536\" tg-height=\"1024\"><span>Photo by FinkAvenue/iStock Editorial via Getty Images</span></p>\n<p>For better or worse,<b>GameStop</b>&nbsp;(NYSE:GME)&nbsp;never ceases to surprise. All year, the business has been through a rollercoaster of a ride as speculators, aiming to punish hedge funds and other institutional investors for shorting the stock, have sent shares soaring higher only to crash back down again. Right now, shares of the business are higher again, though they are far away from where they were at their peak. In truth, GameStop is not worth anywhere near what it is trading for today. With a market cap of $13.1 billion, the company is trading probably close to 10 times what it is actually worth. Having said that, though,recent financial performance, combined with an excellent but overdue&nbsp;strategy&nbsp;for management, could be starting to change what the company is worth fundamentally. I do still believe that shares deserve to be trading far lower than where they are at today, but if management follows recent developments up with another major stock issuance, the firm might be able to justify some of the upside it has seen since the year began.</p>\n<p><b>Recent developments</b></p>\n<p>The headline development regarding GameStop that investors are likely paying attention to revolves around the company's decision to issue an ATM, or at-the-market, program. Simply put, this is an initiative where the company will opportunistically sell shares on the open market in order to raise capital for itself. The rationale here cannot be overlooked. Pretty much nobody will deny that shares of the video game retailer are tremendously overvalued. However, the fact that shares are trading at such a lofty level can work in management's, and investor’s, favor. Since the demand for shares is so high, management can sell stock in order to raise cash. If enough cash is raised, then the company's valuation, or at least some of it, may very well be justified. In essence, it would become a self-fulfilling prophecy.</p>\n<p>This is a strategy that I alluded to in both of my recent articles on the business. You can read them&nbsp;here&nbsp;and&nbsp;here. Yes, management would be diluting shareholders, but that is a small price to pay for the cash that would come in. With that cash, the company could do anything. Ideally, they would use it to continue transforming the firm and pave its way for the future. There are many avenues GameStop could take in order to create shareholder value as its retail stores continue to close down. In the fourth quarter of last year, for instance, the company saw 34% of its net revenue come from e-commerce activities. Year over year, this figure grew by 175%, and compared favorably to the 12% of sales they accounted for in the fourth quarter of 2019. The company could explore making its own video games. It could also focus on other related activities as well.</p>\n<p>According to the terms of its ATM, the company plans to issue up to 3.5 million shares. At present pricing, this would work out to gross proceeds of $654.3 million. Based on my estimates, net proceeds would come in at around $643.9 million. Management is not, however, blind as to how volatile shares have been. After starting out 2021 at under $20 apiece, shares eventually rose to more than $400. As of April 5th, they are at $186.95. because of this volatility, the company also decided to place a limit of $1 billion worth of gross proceeds that it could take in for now. On a net basis, I estimate this would come out to about $984.4 million. No matter how you stack it, the cash raised would be well worth the 4.8% dilution the company would incur.</p>\n<p>Another, though less advertised, headline that came out on April 5th related to the company's financial performance so far in 2021. For the first nine weeks of the fiscal year, GameStop saw its revenue surge 11% compared to the same period a year earlier. The bulk of this increase came from an 18% increase, year over year, in the sales the company generated in the five weeks ending in early April. This came despite weakness associated with the COVID-19 pandemic. And it comes despite the firm’s store base being 13% smaller this year than it was last year.</p>\n<p>Frankly, this financial performance is phenomenal. Unfortunately, we don't know what the entire picture looks like right now, but it is likely that a good portion of this game is coming from the company's online sales. If management can continue to generate this kind of performance, and if it can raise a significant amount of cash, then the case could be made that shares could be worth more than the $20 apiece I indicated in one of my aforementioned prior articles.</p>\n<p>One critique that I have regarding what GameStop is doing today is that I believe the firm is not being aggressive enough. Very possibly, management used this recent ATM to gauge the appetite of the market and to see how much shares might fall in response to this development. For the day (April 5th), shares dropped only 2.4%. So long as we don't see any significant decline near-term, it would appear that the company has proven an appetite in the market for additional shares. And with a 10-day average volume of nearly 21 million shares traded, the business could exhaust this ATM rather quickly.</p>\n<p>It should be mentioned that GameStop does not need this cash. Based on my estimates, as of the end of last year, the business had $635 million in cash on hand. With debt of around $363 million, this left no net debt, but a net cash balance of $272 million. Rather, this strategy is about cashing in overpriced stock for the guarantee of cash they can fill its coffers. Because of all of the events surrounding this, and especially after seeing the market’s reaction to the initial ATM, I would argue that management needs to be issuing more shares than these. As an example, if the firm were to dilute shareholders by 20%, that would result in 17.5 million shares being sold. Gross proceeds would be nearly $3.3 billion. That probably still would not be enough to justify the company's valuation as it stands today, but it would certainly establish a floor. The more that it dilutes shareholders, at least at elevated prices, the more the retailer can grow into its valuation.</p>\n<p><b>Takeaway</b></p>\n<p>Right now, the situation with GameStop is fascinating. It is a clear and extreme example of an irrational market. As I had stated in prior works, if management does nothing, then shares will eventually come down to earth. But this current step is a great step forward. It shows that management is willing to take that lunge, and it gives shareholders the opportunity to create what I would consider a miracle. Namely, it would revitalize and otherwise slowly unwinding firm. Or at least it would give it the opportunity to. I still maintain that true investors should not touch GameStop with a 50 foot pole.But, for speculators, or if management does issue a great deal more shares, then for anybody, it may not be a horrible prospect.</p>","source":"seekingalpha","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>GameStop's Brilliant First Step</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nGameStop's Brilliant First Step\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-04-07 20:43 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4417948-gamestops-brilliant-first-step><strong>seekingalpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Summary\n\nGameStop's shares are significantly overvalued at this point in time.\nHowever, management is finally taking advantage of this fact by issuing new shares.\nThis is a great first step that was ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4417948-gamestops-brilliant-first-step\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"GME":"游戏驿站"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4417948-gamestops-brilliant-first-step","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5a36db9d73b4222bc376d24ccc48c8a4","article_id":"1199135554","content_text":"Summary\n\nGameStop's shares are significantly overvalued at this point in time.\nHowever, management is finally taking advantage of this fact by issuing new shares.\nThis is a great first step that was accompanied by strong sales data, but it's not aggressive enough to preserve the firm's value.\n\nPhoto by FinkAvenue/iStock Editorial via Getty Images\nFor better or worse,GameStop (NYSE:GME) never ceases to surprise. All year, the business has been through a rollercoaster of a ride as speculators, aiming to punish hedge funds and other institutional investors for shorting the stock, have sent shares soaring higher only to crash back down again. Right now, shares of the business are higher again, though they are far away from where they were at their peak. In truth, GameStop is not worth anywhere near what it is trading for today. With a market cap of $13.1 billion, the company is trading probably close to 10 times what it is actually worth. Having said that, though,recent financial performance, combined with an excellent but overdue strategy for management, could be starting to change what the company is worth fundamentally. I do still believe that shares deserve to be trading far lower than where they are at today, but if management follows recent developments up with another major stock issuance, the firm might be able to justify some of the upside it has seen since the year began.\nRecent developments\nThe headline development regarding GameStop that investors are likely paying attention to revolves around the company's decision to issue an ATM, or at-the-market, program. Simply put, this is an initiative where the company will opportunistically sell shares on the open market in order to raise capital for itself. The rationale here cannot be overlooked. Pretty much nobody will deny that shares of the video game retailer are tremendously overvalued. However, the fact that shares are trading at such a lofty level can work in management's, and investor’s, favor. Since the demand for shares is so high, management can sell stock in order to raise cash. If enough cash is raised, then the company's valuation, or at least some of it, may very well be justified. In essence, it would become a self-fulfilling prophecy.\nThis is a strategy that I alluded to in both of my recent articles on the business. You can read them here and here. Yes, management would be diluting shareholders, but that is a small price to pay for the cash that would come in. With that cash, the company could do anything. Ideally, they would use it to continue transforming the firm and pave its way for the future. There are many avenues GameStop could take in order to create shareholder value as its retail stores continue to close down. In the fourth quarter of last year, for instance, the company saw 34% of its net revenue come from e-commerce activities. Year over year, this figure grew by 175%, and compared favorably to the 12% of sales they accounted for in the fourth quarter of 2019. The company could explore making its own video games. It could also focus on other related activities as well.\nAccording to the terms of its ATM, the company plans to issue up to 3.5 million shares. At present pricing, this would work out to gross proceeds of $654.3 million. Based on my estimates, net proceeds would come in at around $643.9 million. Management is not, however, blind as to how volatile shares have been. After starting out 2021 at under $20 apiece, shares eventually rose to more than $400. As of April 5th, they are at $186.95. because of this volatility, the company also decided to place a limit of $1 billion worth of gross proceeds that it could take in for now. On a net basis, I estimate this would come out to about $984.4 million. No matter how you stack it, the cash raised would be well worth the 4.8% dilution the company would incur.\nAnother, though less advertised, headline that came out on April 5th related to the company's financial performance so far in 2021. For the first nine weeks of the fiscal year, GameStop saw its revenue surge 11% compared to the same period a year earlier. The bulk of this increase came from an 18% increase, year over year, in the sales the company generated in the five weeks ending in early April. This came despite weakness associated with the COVID-19 pandemic. And it comes despite the firm’s store base being 13% smaller this year than it was last year.\nFrankly, this financial performance is phenomenal. Unfortunately, we don't know what the entire picture looks like right now, but it is likely that a good portion of this game is coming from the company's online sales. If management can continue to generate this kind of performance, and if it can raise a significant amount of cash, then the case could be made that shares could be worth more than the $20 apiece I indicated in one of my aforementioned prior articles.\nOne critique that I have regarding what GameStop is doing today is that I believe the firm is not being aggressive enough. Very possibly, management used this recent ATM to gauge the appetite of the market and to see how much shares might fall in response to this development. For the day (April 5th), shares dropped only 2.4%. So long as we don't see any significant decline near-term, it would appear that the company has proven an appetite in the market for additional shares. And with a 10-day average volume of nearly 21 million shares traded, the business could exhaust this ATM rather quickly.\nIt should be mentioned that GameStop does not need this cash. Based on my estimates, as of the end of last year, the business had $635 million in cash on hand. With debt of around $363 million, this left no net debt, but a net cash balance of $272 million. Rather, this strategy is about cashing in overpriced stock for the guarantee of cash they can fill its coffers. Because of all of the events surrounding this, and especially after seeing the market’s reaction to the initial ATM, I would argue that management needs to be issuing more shares than these. As an example, if the firm were to dilute shareholders by 20%, that would result in 17.5 million shares being sold. Gross proceeds would be nearly $3.3 billion. That probably still would not be enough to justify the company's valuation as it stands today, but it would certainly establish a floor. The more that it dilutes shareholders, at least at elevated prices, the more the retailer can grow into its valuation.\nTakeaway\nRight now, the situation with GameStop is fascinating. It is a clear and extreme example of an irrational market. As I had stated in prior works, if management does nothing, then shares will eventually come down to earth. But this current step is a great step forward. It shows that management is willing to take that lunge, and it gives shareholders the opportunity to create what I would consider a miracle. Namely, it would revitalize and otherwise slowly unwinding firm. Or at least it would give it the opportunity to. I still maintain that true investors should not touch GameStop with a 50 foot pole.But, for speculators, or if management does issue a great deal more shares, then for anybody, it may not be a horrible prospect.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":256,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":343277534,"gmtCreate":1617721592328,"gmtModify":1704702310367,"author":{"id":"3576837088119232","authorId":"3576837088119232","authorIdStr":"3576837088119232","name":"文氏","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13ab58f27225c31b03dde6b684f98f7e","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576837088119232"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Interesting&nbsp;","listText":"Interesting&nbsp;","text":"Interesting","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/343277534","repostId":"2125902177","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2125902177","pubTimestamp":1617719760,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2125902177?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-04-06 22:36","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Better Buy: Spotify vs. AT&T","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2125902177","media":"Ryan Henderson","summary":"Forget past returns, the winning stock in this comparison looks better over the coming years.","content":"<p>Though <b>AT&amp;T</b> (NYSE:T) and <b>Spotify Technology</b> (NYSE:SPOT) are two completely separate businesses, weighing opportunity costs between two companies can be quite useful as part of the decision-making process on a potential stock investment. While each company has its own management team, capital structure, and strategy, both are vying for shareholder dollars and have some similarities as well.</p><p>With that in mind, let's see which of these two companies is more deserving of an investment.</p><h2>The case for Spotify</h2><p>Spotify is the world's largest audio-streaming platform. It offers music streaming services to 345 million listeners globally and generated $9.3 billion in advertising and subscription revenues in 2020, up 16.5% from the year before. Since 2016, Spotify has increased its total number of monthly active users (MAUs) by 178%. But there's more for investors to consider than just revenue and user count.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/871342cfae0e022f1557db3be0a017d8\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"484\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>Image source: Getty Images.</p><p>Since Spotify doesn't own the music itself, it pays out royalties to the rights owners in order to license it. Royalty distributions eat up a large chunk out of Spotify's revenue, leaving the company with what most investors might deem a meager gross margin: 26.5%. Bear in mind though that while this number certainly looks low, it can change over time.&nbsp;</p><p>Over recent years, Spotify has made almost $1 billion worth of investments into the podcasting space. Podcasting not only brings in new sources of revenue but also introduces different economics as well. Podcasting distribution services like Anchor and Megaphone connect shows with sponsors and take a share of the ad spend for doing so. While the exact profit margins on the business are unknown, it's safe to assume that they're more favorable than Spotify's core music-streaming business.&nbsp;</p><p>Podcast listenership on Spotify is up 99% versus a year ago, yet the bulk of audio advertising spend it receives is still from linear radio. According to the website Inside Radio, roughly $15 billion was spent on radio advertising in the U.S. and Canada in 2020. Podcast ad spend, on the other hand, was less than $1 billion.&nbsp;As Spotify continues to optimize its ad insertion technology, it should be able to offer advertisers a more targeted experience compared to traditional radio.</p><p>As for its music streaming segment, as Spotify amasses a larger user base each year, its leverage with rights holders increases. Artists are opting to take lower distribution fees in exchange for promotion on Spotify's highly followed playlists. In short, owning the users is becoming more important than owning the music.&nbsp;</p><h2>The case for AT&amp;T</h2><p>Founded in 1885, it's safe to say that telecommunications giant AT&amp;T is at a much later stage of its business life cycle than Spotify. But just because it's older doesn't make it a worse investment. In 2020, AT&amp;T generated $27.5 billion in free cash flow and paid out 55% of that FCF as dividends to its shareholders.</p><p>While AT&amp;T's stock performance over the last five years has been poor, past performance doesn't necessarily reflect future returns. AT&amp;T currently boasts a dividend yield of more than 6% and its stock only trades at a market cap of just under eight times its trailing-12-month free cash flow.&nbsp;</p><p>The main reason for this seemingly dirt-cheap valuation is the company's massive debt load. AT&amp;T currently has $157 billion in total debt on its books with maturity dates extending out as far as 2097!</p><p>Though that total debt number seems like a large hurdle to overcome, the amount of leverage is trending in the right direction as management works to pay it down. Not only is total debt down 11% from 2018, but it's also worth remembering that AT&amp;T consistently generates north of $25 billion in free cash flow per year, making paying that debt down over time very manageable.&nbsp;</p><p>In 2020, AT&amp;T also replaced its CEO amid pressure from activist investors. For shareholders, this changing of the guard should hopefully mark a more conservative approach to capital allocation.&nbsp;</p><h2>Which is the better buy?</h2><p>Despite the improvements AT&amp;T has made in recent years, Spotify appears to have greater stock price upside from here. The company continues to increase gross margin, and it projects to have more than 400 million users by the end of 2021.&nbsp;</p><p>Though the music industry moves quite slowly, Spotify's financials should soon begin to reflect its role as the premier platform for audio consumption globally.&nbsp;</p>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Better Buy: Spotify vs. AT&T</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBetter Buy: Spotify vs. AT&T\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-04-06 22:36 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/04/06/better-buy-spotify-vs-att/><strong>Ryan Henderson</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Though AT&T (NYSE:T) and Spotify Technology (NYSE:SPOT) are two completely separate businesses, weighing opportunity costs between two companies can be quite useful as part of the decision-making ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/04/06/better-buy-spotify-vs-att/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SPOT":"Spotify Technology S.A.","T":"美国电话电报"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/04/06/better-buy-spotify-vs-att/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2125902177","content_text":"Though AT&T (NYSE:T) and Spotify Technology (NYSE:SPOT) are two completely separate businesses, weighing opportunity costs between two companies can be quite useful as part of the decision-making process on a potential stock investment. While each company has its own management team, capital structure, and strategy, both are vying for shareholder dollars and have some similarities as well.With that in mind, let's see which of these two companies is more deserving of an investment.The case for SpotifySpotify is the world's largest audio-streaming platform. It offers music streaming services to 345 million listeners globally and generated $9.3 billion in advertising and subscription revenues in 2020, up 16.5% from the year before. Since 2016, Spotify has increased its total number of monthly active users (MAUs) by 178%. But there's more for investors to consider than just revenue and user count.Image source: Getty Images.Since Spotify doesn't own the music itself, it pays out royalties to the rights owners in order to license it. Royalty distributions eat up a large chunk out of Spotify's revenue, leaving the company with what most investors might deem a meager gross margin: 26.5%. Bear in mind though that while this number certainly looks low, it can change over time. Over recent years, Spotify has made almost $1 billion worth of investments into the podcasting space. Podcasting not only brings in new sources of revenue but also introduces different economics as well. Podcasting distribution services like Anchor and Megaphone connect shows with sponsors and take a share of the ad spend for doing so. While the exact profit margins on the business are unknown, it's safe to assume that they're more favorable than Spotify's core music-streaming business. Podcast listenership on Spotify is up 99% versus a year ago, yet the bulk of audio advertising spend it receives is still from linear radio. According to the website Inside Radio, roughly $15 billion was spent on radio advertising in the U.S. and Canada in 2020. Podcast ad spend, on the other hand, was less than $1 billion. As Spotify continues to optimize its ad insertion technology, it should be able to offer advertisers a more targeted experience compared to traditional radio.As for its music streaming segment, as Spotify amasses a larger user base each year, its leverage with rights holders increases. Artists are opting to take lower distribution fees in exchange for promotion on Spotify's highly followed playlists. In short, owning the users is becoming more important than owning the music. The case for AT&TFounded in 1885, it's safe to say that telecommunications giant AT&T is at a much later stage of its business life cycle than Spotify. But just because it's older doesn't make it a worse investment. In 2020, AT&T generated $27.5 billion in free cash flow and paid out 55% of that FCF as dividends to its shareholders.While AT&T's stock performance over the last five years has been poor, past performance doesn't necessarily reflect future returns. AT&T currently boasts a dividend yield of more than 6% and its stock only trades at a market cap of just under eight times its trailing-12-month free cash flow. The main reason for this seemingly dirt-cheap valuation is the company's massive debt load. AT&T currently has $157 billion in total debt on its books with maturity dates extending out as far as 2097!Though that total debt number seems like a large hurdle to overcome, the amount of leverage is trending in the right direction as management works to pay it down. Not only is total debt down 11% from 2018, but it's also worth remembering that AT&T consistently generates north of $25 billion in free cash flow per year, making paying that debt down over time very manageable. In 2020, AT&T also replaced its CEO amid pressure from activist investors. For shareholders, this changing of the guard should hopefully mark a more conservative approach to capital allocation. Which is the better buy?Despite the improvements AT&T has made in recent years, Spotify appears to have greater stock price upside from here. The company continues to increase gross margin, and it projects to have more than 400 million users by the end of 2021. Though the music industry moves quite slowly, Spotify's financials should soon begin to reflect its role as the premier platform for audio consumption globally.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":134,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":343238667,"gmtCreate":1617717837959,"gmtModify":1704702203654,"author":{"id":"3576837088119232","authorId":"3576837088119232","authorIdStr":"3576837088119232","name":"文氏","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13ab58f27225c31b03dde6b684f98f7e","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576837088119232"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">$Tesla Motors(TSLA)$</a>motoring please","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">$Tesla Motors(TSLA)$</a>motoring please","text":"$Tesla Motors(TSLA)$motoring please","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/343238667","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":127,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":376892382,"gmtCreate":1619101460146,"gmtModify":1704719691412,"author":{"id":"3576837088119232","authorId":"3576837088119232","authorIdStr":"3576837088119232","name":"文氏","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13ab58f27225c31b03dde6b684f98f7e","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576837088119232"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ohhh good explanation&nbsp;","listText":"Ohhh good explanation&nbsp;","text":"Ohhh good explanation","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/376892382","repostId":"1172040780","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1172040780","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Stock Market Quotes, Business News, Financial News, Trading Ideas, and Stock Research by Professionals","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Benzinga","id":"1052270027","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa"},"pubTimestamp":1619096972,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1172040780?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-04-22 21:09","market":"us","language":"en","title":"3 EV Stocks That Are At Important Support Levels And Could Rebound","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1172040780","media":"Benzinga","summary":"Electric vehicle companies NIO Inc. ,Tesla,Inc. , and Nikola Corporation  are all trading close to support. This means there is a good chance they rally.Support is a concentration of buyers who have gathered at the same price level. At support levels, there is more demand for the stock than there is supply. Sellers can sell all they need to with no fear of pushing the price lower.Sometimes, stocks rally after they fall to support. This happens when some of the market participants decide to pay h","content":"<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c1474f81bdbd94c87c3c2fd7c6b2c663\" tg-width=\"1200\" tg-height=\"630\"></p>\n<p>Electric vehicle companies&nbsp;<b>NIO Inc.</b>&nbsp;(NYSE:NIO),<b>Tesla</b>,<b>Inc.</b>&nbsp;(NASDAQ:TSLA), and&nbsp;<b>Nikola Corporation</b>&nbsp;(NASDAQ:NKLA) are all trading close to support. This means there is a good chance they rally.</p>\n<p>Support is a concentration of buyers who have gathered at the same price level. At support levels, there is more demand for the stock than there is supply. Sellers can sell all they need to with no fear of pushing the price lower.</p>\n<p>Downtrends end when they reach support levels.</p>\n<p>Sometimes, stocks rally after they fall to support. This happens when some of the market participants decide to pay higher prices. These investors think the large buyers who created the support will eventually drive the stock higher. They want to get ahead of them.</p>\n<p>Nio has held support around the $35 level. It also reached this level in early and mid-March. Both times, a small rebound followed and that could happen again.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0f08d2b7d5a4ce9f09e0f8a96d111469\" tg-width=\"1528\" tg-height=\"816\"></p>\n<p>Tesla has held support around the $700 level. There is support at $700 because it was a resistance level and levels that were resistance can turn into support.</p>\n<p>This happens because many of the investors who sold their shares at $700 believe they made a mistake when the shares traded higher afterward. A number of these investors decide to buy the stock back, but they will only do so if they can get it for the same price they sold at.</p>\n<p>As a result, buy orders are placed at a level that had been resistance, which&nbsp;will create support. If there are enough of these buy orders, the level will turn into a support level. That’s the case here.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/16bc657cff0abad9f5cbacb644ad799c\" tg-width=\"1519\" tg-height=\"821\"></p>\n<p>Shares of Nikola have come full circle.</p>\n<p>Last April, they were trading around $10 and&nbsp;soared to more than $90 in June.&nbsp;Since then, the stock has&nbsp;trended lower and is&nbsp;trading at $10 once again.</p>\n<p>There’s support at $10 because investors like to place their orders at even numbers. After the steep decline, there's a chance&nbsp;shares stage some type of rebound.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4eac22ac2bd93e4ebad3120cc1f95348\" tg-width=\"1526\" tg-height=\"812\"></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>3 EV Stocks That Are At Important Support Levels And Could Rebound</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n3 EV Stocks That Are At Important Support Levels And Could Rebound\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Benzinga </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-04-22 21:09</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c1474f81bdbd94c87c3c2fd7c6b2c663\" tg-width=\"1200\" tg-height=\"630\"></p>\n<p>Electric vehicle companies&nbsp;<b>NIO Inc.</b>&nbsp;(NYSE:NIO),<b>Tesla</b>,<b>Inc.</b>&nbsp;(NASDAQ:TSLA), and&nbsp;<b>Nikola Corporation</b>&nbsp;(NASDAQ:NKLA) are all trading close to support. This means there is a good chance they rally.</p>\n<p>Support is a concentration of buyers who have gathered at the same price level. At support levels, there is more demand for the stock than there is supply. Sellers can sell all they need to with no fear of pushing the price lower.</p>\n<p>Downtrends end when they reach support levels.</p>\n<p>Sometimes, stocks rally after they fall to support. This happens when some of the market participants decide to pay higher prices. These investors think the large buyers who created the support will eventually drive the stock higher. They want to get ahead of them.</p>\n<p>Nio has held support around the $35 level. It also reached this level in early and mid-March. Both times, a small rebound followed and that could happen again.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0f08d2b7d5a4ce9f09e0f8a96d111469\" tg-width=\"1528\" tg-height=\"816\"></p>\n<p>Tesla has held support around the $700 level. There is support at $700 because it was a resistance level and levels that were resistance can turn into support.</p>\n<p>This happens because many of the investors who sold their shares at $700 believe they made a mistake when the shares traded higher afterward. A number of these investors decide to buy the stock back, but they will only do so if they can get it for the same price they sold at.</p>\n<p>As a result, buy orders are placed at a level that had been resistance, which&nbsp;will create support. If there are enough of these buy orders, the level will turn into a support level. That’s the case here.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/16bc657cff0abad9f5cbacb644ad799c\" tg-width=\"1519\" tg-height=\"821\"></p>\n<p>Shares of Nikola have come full circle.</p>\n<p>Last April, they were trading around $10 and&nbsp;soared to more than $90 in June.&nbsp;Since then, the stock has&nbsp;trended lower and is&nbsp;trading at $10 once again.</p>\n<p>There’s support at $10 because investors like to place their orders at even numbers. After the steep decline, there's a chance&nbsp;shares stage some type of rebound.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4eac22ac2bd93e4ebad3120cc1f95348\" tg-width=\"1526\" tg-height=\"812\"></p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NIO":"蔚来","NKLA":"Nikola Corporation","TSLA":"特斯拉"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1172040780","content_text":"Electric vehicle companies NIO Inc. (NYSE:NIO),Tesla,Inc. (NASDAQ:TSLA), and Nikola Corporation (NASDAQ:NKLA) are all trading close to support. This means there is a good chance they rally.\nSupport is a concentration of buyers who have gathered at the same price level. At support levels, there is more demand for the stock than there is supply. Sellers can sell all they need to with no fear of pushing the price lower.\nDowntrends end when they reach support levels.\nSometimes, stocks rally after they fall to support. This happens when some of the market participants decide to pay higher prices. These investors think the large buyers who created the support will eventually drive the stock higher. They want to get ahead of them.\nNio has held support around the $35 level. It also reached this level in early and mid-March. Both times, a small rebound followed and that could happen again.\n\nTesla has held support around the $700 level. There is support at $700 because it was a resistance level and levels that were resistance can turn into support.\nThis happens because many of the investors who sold their shares at $700 believe they made a mistake when the shares traded higher afterward. A number of these investors decide to buy the stock back, but they will only do so if they can get it for the same price they sold at.\nAs a result, buy orders are placed at a level that had been resistance, which will create support. If there are enough of these buy orders, the level will turn into a support level. That’s the case here.\n\nShares of Nikola have come full circle.\nLast April, they were trading around $10 and soared to more than $90 in June. Since then, the stock has trended lower and is trading at $10 once again.\nThere’s support at $10 because investors like to place their orders at even numbers. After the steep decline, there's a chance shares stage some type of rebound.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":307,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[{"author":{"id":"3579733246085840","authorId":"3579733246085840","authorIdStr":"3579733246085840","name":"wallflowere","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a5072464fdb4037d83d403dc2e80c19c","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3579733246085840"},"content":"which one will u invest in? I'm vested in tsla","text":"which one will u invest in? I'm vested in tsla","html":"which one will u invest in? I'm vested in tsla"}],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":341899511,"gmtCreate":1617800439733,"gmtModify":1704703286304,"author":{"id":"3576837088119232","authorId":"3576837088119232","authorIdStr":"3576837088119232","name":"文氏","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13ab58f27225c31b03dde6b684f98f7e","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576837088119232"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Yay!","listText":"Yay!","text":"Yay!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/341899511","repostId":"1199135554","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1199135554","pubTimestamp":1617799435,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1199135554?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-04-07 20:43","market":"us","language":"en","title":"GameStop's Brilliant First Step","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1199135554","media":"seekingalpha","summary":"Summary\n\nGameStop's shares are significantly overvalued at this point in time.\nHowever, management i","content":"<p><b>Summary</b></p>\n<ul>\n <li>GameStop's shares are significantly overvalued at this point in time.</li>\n <li>However, management is finally taking advantage of this fact by issuing new shares.</li>\n <li>This is a great first step that was accompanied by strong sales data, but it's not aggressive enough to preserve the firm's value.</li>\n</ul>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1f963c480ab9aca8a75f578a9d705bd7\" tg-width=\"1536\" tg-height=\"1024\"><span>Photo by FinkAvenue/iStock Editorial via Getty Images</span></p>\n<p>For better or worse,<b>GameStop</b>&nbsp;(NYSE:GME)&nbsp;never ceases to surprise. All year, the business has been through a rollercoaster of a ride as speculators, aiming to punish hedge funds and other institutional investors for shorting the stock, have sent shares soaring higher only to crash back down again. Right now, shares of the business are higher again, though they are far away from where they were at their peak. In truth, GameStop is not worth anywhere near what it is trading for today. With a market cap of $13.1 billion, the company is trading probably close to 10 times what it is actually worth. Having said that, though,recent financial performance, combined with an excellent but overdue&nbsp;strategy&nbsp;for management, could be starting to change what the company is worth fundamentally. I do still believe that shares deserve to be trading far lower than where they are at today, but if management follows recent developments up with another major stock issuance, the firm might be able to justify some of the upside it has seen since the year began.</p>\n<p><b>Recent developments</b></p>\n<p>The headline development regarding GameStop that investors are likely paying attention to revolves around the company's decision to issue an ATM, or at-the-market, program. Simply put, this is an initiative where the company will opportunistically sell shares on the open market in order to raise capital for itself. The rationale here cannot be overlooked. Pretty much nobody will deny that shares of the video game retailer are tremendously overvalued. However, the fact that shares are trading at such a lofty level can work in management's, and investor’s, favor. Since the demand for shares is so high, management can sell stock in order to raise cash. If enough cash is raised, then the company's valuation, or at least some of it, may very well be justified. In essence, it would become a self-fulfilling prophecy.</p>\n<p>This is a strategy that I alluded to in both of my recent articles on the business. You can read them&nbsp;here&nbsp;and&nbsp;here. Yes, management would be diluting shareholders, but that is a small price to pay for the cash that would come in. With that cash, the company could do anything. Ideally, they would use it to continue transforming the firm and pave its way for the future. There are many avenues GameStop could take in order to create shareholder value as its retail stores continue to close down. In the fourth quarter of last year, for instance, the company saw 34% of its net revenue come from e-commerce activities. Year over year, this figure grew by 175%, and compared favorably to the 12% of sales they accounted for in the fourth quarter of 2019. The company could explore making its own video games. It could also focus on other related activities as well.</p>\n<p>According to the terms of its ATM, the company plans to issue up to 3.5 million shares. At present pricing, this would work out to gross proceeds of $654.3 million. Based on my estimates, net proceeds would come in at around $643.9 million. Management is not, however, blind as to how volatile shares have been. After starting out 2021 at under $20 apiece, shares eventually rose to more than $400. As of April 5th, they are at $186.95. because of this volatility, the company also decided to place a limit of $1 billion worth of gross proceeds that it could take in for now. On a net basis, I estimate this would come out to about $984.4 million. No matter how you stack it, the cash raised would be well worth the 4.8% dilution the company would incur.</p>\n<p>Another, though less advertised, headline that came out on April 5th related to the company's financial performance so far in 2021. For the first nine weeks of the fiscal year, GameStop saw its revenue surge 11% compared to the same period a year earlier. The bulk of this increase came from an 18% increase, year over year, in the sales the company generated in the five weeks ending in early April. This came despite weakness associated with the COVID-19 pandemic. And it comes despite the firm’s store base being 13% smaller this year than it was last year.</p>\n<p>Frankly, this financial performance is phenomenal. Unfortunately, we don't know what the entire picture looks like right now, but it is likely that a good portion of this game is coming from the company's online sales. If management can continue to generate this kind of performance, and if it can raise a significant amount of cash, then the case could be made that shares could be worth more than the $20 apiece I indicated in one of my aforementioned prior articles.</p>\n<p>One critique that I have regarding what GameStop is doing today is that I believe the firm is not being aggressive enough. Very possibly, management used this recent ATM to gauge the appetite of the market and to see how much shares might fall in response to this development. For the day (April 5th), shares dropped only 2.4%. So long as we don't see any significant decline near-term, it would appear that the company has proven an appetite in the market for additional shares. And with a 10-day average volume of nearly 21 million shares traded, the business could exhaust this ATM rather quickly.</p>\n<p>It should be mentioned that GameStop does not need this cash. Based on my estimates, as of the end of last year, the business had $635 million in cash on hand. With debt of around $363 million, this left no net debt, but a net cash balance of $272 million. Rather, this strategy is about cashing in overpriced stock for the guarantee of cash they can fill its coffers. Because of all of the events surrounding this, and especially after seeing the market’s reaction to the initial ATM, I would argue that management needs to be issuing more shares than these. As an example, if the firm were to dilute shareholders by 20%, that would result in 17.5 million shares being sold. Gross proceeds would be nearly $3.3 billion. That probably still would not be enough to justify the company's valuation as it stands today, but it would certainly establish a floor. The more that it dilutes shareholders, at least at elevated prices, the more the retailer can grow into its valuation.</p>\n<p><b>Takeaway</b></p>\n<p>Right now, the situation with GameStop is fascinating. It is a clear and extreme example of an irrational market. As I had stated in prior works, if management does nothing, then shares will eventually come down to earth. But this current step is a great step forward. It shows that management is willing to take that lunge, and it gives shareholders the opportunity to create what I would consider a miracle. Namely, it would revitalize and otherwise slowly unwinding firm. Or at least it would give it the opportunity to. I still maintain that true investors should not touch GameStop with a 50 foot pole.But, for speculators, or if management does issue a great deal more shares, then for anybody, it may not be a horrible prospect.</p>","source":"seekingalpha","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>GameStop's Brilliant First Step</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nGameStop's Brilliant First Step\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-04-07 20:43 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4417948-gamestops-brilliant-first-step><strong>seekingalpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Summary\n\nGameStop's shares are significantly overvalued at this point in time.\nHowever, management is finally taking advantage of this fact by issuing new shares.\nThis is a great first step that was ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4417948-gamestops-brilliant-first-step\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"GME":"游戏驿站"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4417948-gamestops-brilliant-first-step","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5a36db9d73b4222bc376d24ccc48c8a4","article_id":"1199135554","content_text":"Summary\n\nGameStop's shares are significantly overvalued at this point in time.\nHowever, management is finally taking advantage of this fact by issuing new shares.\nThis is a great first step that was accompanied by strong sales data, but it's not aggressive enough to preserve the firm's value.\n\nPhoto by FinkAvenue/iStock Editorial via Getty Images\nFor better or worse,GameStop (NYSE:GME) never ceases to surprise. All year, the business has been through a rollercoaster of a ride as speculators, aiming to punish hedge funds and other institutional investors for shorting the stock, have sent shares soaring higher only to crash back down again. Right now, shares of the business are higher again, though they are far away from where they were at their peak. In truth, GameStop is not worth anywhere near what it is trading for today. With a market cap of $13.1 billion, the company is trading probably close to 10 times what it is actually worth. Having said that, though,recent financial performance, combined with an excellent but overdue strategy for management, could be starting to change what the company is worth fundamentally. I do still believe that shares deserve to be trading far lower than where they are at today, but if management follows recent developments up with another major stock issuance, the firm might be able to justify some of the upside it has seen since the year began.\nRecent developments\nThe headline development regarding GameStop that investors are likely paying attention to revolves around the company's decision to issue an ATM, or at-the-market, program. Simply put, this is an initiative where the company will opportunistically sell shares on the open market in order to raise capital for itself. The rationale here cannot be overlooked. Pretty much nobody will deny that shares of the video game retailer are tremendously overvalued. However, the fact that shares are trading at such a lofty level can work in management's, and investor’s, favor. Since the demand for shares is so high, management can sell stock in order to raise cash. If enough cash is raised, then the company's valuation, or at least some of it, may very well be justified. In essence, it would become a self-fulfilling prophecy.\nThis is a strategy that I alluded to in both of my recent articles on the business. You can read them here and here. Yes, management would be diluting shareholders, but that is a small price to pay for the cash that would come in. With that cash, the company could do anything. Ideally, they would use it to continue transforming the firm and pave its way for the future. There are many avenues GameStop could take in order to create shareholder value as its retail stores continue to close down. In the fourth quarter of last year, for instance, the company saw 34% of its net revenue come from e-commerce activities. Year over year, this figure grew by 175%, and compared favorably to the 12% of sales they accounted for in the fourth quarter of 2019. The company could explore making its own video games. It could also focus on other related activities as well.\nAccording to the terms of its ATM, the company plans to issue up to 3.5 million shares. At present pricing, this would work out to gross proceeds of $654.3 million. Based on my estimates, net proceeds would come in at around $643.9 million. Management is not, however, blind as to how volatile shares have been. After starting out 2021 at under $20 apiece, shares eventually rose to more than $400. As of April 5th, they are at $186.95. because of this volatility, the company also decided to place a limit of $1 billion worth of gross proceeds that it could take in for now. On a net basis, I estimate this would come out to about $984.4 million. No matter how you stack it, the cash raised would be well worth the 4.8% dilution the company would incur.\nAnother, though less advertised, headline that came out on April 5th related to the company's financial performance so far in 2021. For the first nine weeks of the fiscal year, GameStop saw its revenue surge 11% compared to the same period a year earlier. The bulk of this increase came from an 18% increase, year over year, in the sales the company generated in the five weeks ending in early April. This came despite weakness associated with the COVID-19 pandemic. And it comes despite the firm’s store base being 13% smaller this year than it was last year.\nFrankly, this financial performance is phenomenal. Unfortunately, we don't know what the entire picture looks like right now, but it is likely that a good portion of this game is coming from the company's online sales. If management can continue to generate this kind of performance, and if it can raise a significant amount of cash, then the case could be made that shares could be worth more than the $20 apiece I indicated in one of my aforementioned prior articles.\nOne critique that I have regarding what GameStop is doing today is that I believe the firm is not being aggressive enough. Very possibly, management used this recent ATM to gauge the appetite of the market and to see how much shares might fall in response to this development. For the day (April 5th), shares dropped only 2.4%. So long as we don't see any significant decline near-term, it would appear that the company has proven an appetite in the market for additional shares. And with a 10-day average volume of nearly 21 million shares traded, the business could exhaust this ATM rather quickly.\nIt should be mentioned that GameStop does not need this cash. Based on my estimates, as of the end of last year, the business had $635 million in cash on hand. With debt of around $363 million, this left no net debt, but a net cash balance of $272 million. Rather, this strategy is about cashing in overpriced stock for the guarantee of cash they can fill its coffers. Because of all of the events surrounding this, and especially after seeing the market’s reaction to the initial ATM, I would argue that management needs to be issuing more shares than these. As an example, if the firm were to dilute shareholders by 20%, that would result in 17.5 million shares being sold. Gross proceeds would be nearly $3.3 billion. That probably still would not be enough to justify the company's valuation as it stands today, but it would certainly establish a floor. The more that it dilutes shareholders, at least at elevated prices, the more the retailer can grow into its valuation.\nTakeaway\nRight now, the situation with GameStop is fascinating. It is a clear and extreme example of an irrational market. As I had stated in prior works, if management does nothing, then shares will eventually come down to earth. But this current step is a great step forward. It shows that management is willing to take that lunge, and it gives shareholders the opportunity to create what I would consider a miracle. Namely, it would revitalize and otherwise slowly unwinding firm. Or at least it would give it the opportunity to. I still maintain that true investors should not touch GameStop with a 50 foot pole.But, for speculators, or if management does issue a great deal more shares, then for anybody, it may not be a horrible prospect.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":256,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":100673831,"gmtCreate":1619613528223,"gmtModify":1704726785737,"author":{"id":"3576837088119232","authorId":"3576837088119232","authorIdStr":"3576837088119232","name":"文氏","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13ab58f27225c31b03dde6b684f98f7e","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576837088119232"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hmmm food for thought&nbsp;","listText":"Hmmm food for thought&nbsp;","text":"Hmmm food for thought","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/100673831","repostId":"1138128459","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1138128459","pubTimestamp":1619608043,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1138128459?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-04-28 19:07","market":"us","language":"en","title":"5 Ultra-Popular Growth Stocks With 28% to 56% Upside, According to Wall Street","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1138128459","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"For 13 months, Wall Street has proved virtually unstoppable. Since hitting a bear market bottom on M","content":"<p>For 13 months, Wall Street has proved virtually unstoppable. Since hitting a bear market bottom on March 23, 2020, the broad-based<b>S&amp;P 500</b>has galloped higher by 87%, through this past weekend. This handily outpaces the average bounce-back rally from a bear-market bottom and leaves the historic average annual return for the benchmark index eating dust.</p>\n<p>Yet even at these lofty levels, Wall Street professionals see value. Based on the consensus one-year price targets of Wall Street analysts, five of the most populargrowth stocksoffer implied upside ranging from a low of 28% to as much as 56%.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d19c9dd5972bb303415e3fb9e20fb2d4\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>IMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES.</p>\n<p>Shopify: Implied upside of 31%</p>\n<p>First up is my absolute favorite software-as-a-service (SaaS) stock,<b>Shopify</b>(NYSE:SHOP). Even after gaining more than 1,000% over the past 3.5 years, Wall Street believes the company's stock offers an additional 31% upside to $1,434 a share over the next year.</p>\n<p>Shopify's operating model of providing cloud-based e-commerce solutions to (primarily) small businessescouldn't be in a better place at the moment. Although it was initially hit by the pandemic with virtually all other retail-oriented companies, it quickly became apparent that Shopify's e-commerce platform would be a logical beneficiary as businesses shifted course and pushed online. The result was a 96% increase in gross merchandise value (GMV) transacted across its platform in 2020 to $119.6 billion. Over the past six years, GMV has grown at a compound annual rate of 77.7%.</p>\n<p>What's made Shopify tick is both the discovery of the platform by new merchants and the ability to snag worthwhile deals with major retailers. The number of consumers using the platform increased by approximately 52% last year to 457 million. Meanwhile, itpartneredwith the likes of<b>Walmart</b>&nbsp;and<b>Pinterest</b>to streamline aspects of their online sales platforms.</p>\n<p>Shopify isn't remotely inexpensive on a fundamental basis. But if it can continue to grow its GMV at these insane levels, investors will gladly pay a hefty premium to own Shopify stock.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/df219df7b01fbc2aa008c455f28b99e5\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>IMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES.</p>\n<p>Teladoc Health: Implied upside of 40%</p>\n<p>Telemedicine giant<b>Teladoc Health</b>(NYSE:TDOC)has been exceptionally popular over the past year, for obvious reasons I'll touch on in a moment. According to Wall Street, shares of Teladoc could ascend past $250 over the next 12 months, giving it an implied upside of 40%.</p>\n<p>As you can imagine, physicians wanted to keep at-risk people and potentially infected patients out of offices and hospitals if at all possible last year. This led to Teladoc handling almost 10.6 million virtual visits in 2020, up from around 4.1 million in the previous year.</p>\n<p>But understand that telehealth is agame-changing healthcare modeland not just a one-year wonder because of the pandemic. It's far more convenient for patients, allows physicians to keep closer tabs on at-risk patients, and is usually billed at a lower rate than office visits, which health insurers love. These advantages are exactly why Teladoc's sales grew by an average annual rate of 74% between 2013 and 2019.</p>\n<p>Furthermore, Teladoc has a new toy, so to speak: Itacquired leading applied health signals company Livongo Healthin early November. Livongo leans on artificial intelligence to send tips and nudges to patients with chronic illnesses. These nudges help patients make behavioral changes that result in their leading healthier lives. The addition of Livongo makes Teladoc a veritable no-brainer buy.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0e47e6b6eced3a10e200ffd777619a0c\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"393\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>IMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES.</p>\n<p>Snowflake: Implied upside of 28%</p>\n<p>Another high-growth stock with abundant upside according to Wall Street professionals is cloud data warehousing company<b>Snowflake</b>(NYSE:SNOW). After recently retracing to an all-time low, analysts see Snowflake gaining up to 28% to almost $301 a share over the next 12 months.</p>\n<p>As I alluded to with Shopify, we're witnessing a big push by businesses online and into the cloud, which has been a boon for most cloud infrastructure companies. Despite the worst economic downturn in decades, Snowflake grew its product revenue by 120% to $553.8 million in fiscal 2021. Although it's losing a lot of money at the moment, the services Snowflake offers should yield juicy margins as the company matures.</p>\n<p>Arguably the most interesting thing about Snowflake is itssustainable competitive advantages. For instance, it offers a pay-as-you-go model that shuns the subscriptions that SaaS stocks often covet. By allowing its customers to pay based on their storage needs and Snowflake Compute Credits used, it's offering a highly transparent and cost-effective operating model.</p>\n<p>Even better, its platform islayered atop the most popular cloud infrastructure solutions, which makes the sharing of information seamless, regardless of storage provider.</p>\n<p>Snowflake has some very big shoes to fill with its lofty valuation, but Wall Street believes the company can get it done.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bbafad9e87b7b7dacfefe92d4741b655\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"393\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>IMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES.</p>\n<p>Datadog: Implied upside of 35%</p>\n<p>Have I mentioned that Wall Street has a thing forSaaS stocks? In addition to Shopify and Snowflake, analysts believe that application monitoring solutions provider<b>Datadog</b>(NASDAQ:DDOG)could surge to $121 a share over the next year. This implies up to 35% upside in its shares.</p>\n<p>Keeping with the theme, Datadog looks to benefit from businesses completely shifting their strategy in the wake of the pandemic. With employees working remotely, it's become more important than ever that businesses stay on top of key metrics, oversee critical applications, and fully understand the behavior of their customers. Datadog's cloud-based solutions do all of this for its clients.</p>\n<p>What's been most impressive about Datadog is the company's ability to attract bigger clients. While a 46% increase in customers with at least $100,000 in annual recurring revenue (ARR) is nice, the \"wow\" number is the 94% increase in the number of customers generating at least $1 million in ARR. This is a big reason the company's sales shot 66% higher in 2020 to $603.5 million.</p>\n<p>Similar to Snowflake, Datadog has a lot to prove with its lofty price-to-sales ratio. However, if it can continue to grow its sales by more than 30% annually, there'sno reason Wall Street's price target isn't within reach.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/99b3853458b2424e2901821012f5502f\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>IMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES.</p>\n<p>Coinbase: Implied upside of 56%</p>\n<p>Finally, recent initial public offering<b>Coinbase</b>(NASDAQ:COIN)offers the highest perceived upside among these five fast-growing companies. Though there were only four price targets listed through this past weekend, a lofty target of $600 a share skewed the consensus up to $456 a share. This suggests Coinbase could gain 56% over the coming 12 months.</p>\n<p>There's no doubt that Coinbase has benefited from the euphoria surrounding cryptocurrencies like<b>Bitcoin</b>and&nbsp;<b>Ethereum</b>. With both rallying to new highs this year, Coinbase recorded $1.8 billion in revenue in the first quarter. For some context, that's more revenue than it had generated in the previous 24 months combined!</p>\n<p>However, unlike the other popular companies listed here,Coinbase's advantages look flimsy, at best. It runs the risk of competing crypto brokerages undercutting its fees, which could reduce its operating margins and growth rate dramatically over time.</p>\n<p>Furthermore,its business model looks to be built upon euphoria&nbsp;rather than innovation. With most of its revenue coming from Bitcoin and Ethereum trading, it's worrisome to see what happens when the price of these key assets stops rising. In a two-year stretch where Bitcoin lost 80% of its value, Coinbase saw its revenue nearly get halved.</p>\n<p>In sum, Wall Street may be bullish on Coinbase, but this Fool isn't.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>5 Ultra-Popular Growth Stocks With 28% to 56% Upside, According to Wall Street</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n5 Ultra-Popular Growth Stocks With 28% to 56% Upside, According to Wall Street\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-04-28 19:07 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/04/28/5-growth-stocks-with-28-to-56-upside-wall-street/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>For 13 months, Wall Street has proved virtually unstoppable. Since hitting a bear market bottom on March 23, 2020, the broad-basedS&P 500has galloped higher by 87%, through this past weekend. This ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/04/28/5-growth-stocks-with-28-to-56-upside-wall-street/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"DDOG":"Datadog","TDOC":"Teladoc Health Inc.","SNOW":"Snowflake","SHOP":"Shopify Inc","COIN":"Coinbase Global, Inc."},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/04/28/5-growth-stocks-with-28-to-56-upside-wall-street/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1138128459","content_text":"For 13 months, Wall Street has proved virtually unstoppable. Since hitting a bear market bottom on March 23, 2020, the broad-basedS&P 500has galloped higher by 87%, through this past weekend. This handily outpaces the average bounce-back rally from a bear-market bottom and leaves the historic average annual return for the benchmark index eating dust.\nYet even at these lofty levels, Wall Street professionals see value. Based on the consensus one-year price targets of Wall Street analysts, five of the most populargrowth stocksoffer implied upside ranging from a low of 28% to as much as 56%.\n\nIMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES.\nShopify: Implied upside of 31%\nFirst up is my absolute favorite software-as-a-service (SaaS) stock,Shopify(NYSE:SHOP). Even after gaining more than 1,000% over the past 3.5 years, Wall Street believes the company's stock offers an additional 31% upside to $1,434 a share over the next year.\nShopify's operating model of providing cloud-based e-commerce solutions to (primarily) small businessescouldn't be in a better place at the moment. Although it was initially hit by the pandemic with virtually all other retail-oriented companies, it quickly became apparent that Shopify's e-commerce platform would be a logical beneficiary as businesses shifted course and pushed online. The result was a 96% increase in gross merchandise value (GMV) transacted across its platform in 2020 to $119.6 billion. Over the past six years, GMV has grown at a compound annual rate of 77.7%.\nWhat's made Shopify tick is both the discovery of the platform by new merchants and the ability to snag worthwhile deals with major retailers. The number of consumers using the platform increased by approximately 52% last year to 457 million. Meanwhile, itpartneredwith the likes ofWalmart andPinterestto streamline aspects of their online sales platforms.\nShopify isn't remotely inexpensive on a fundamental basis. But if it can continue to grow its GMV at these insane levels, investors will gladly pay a hefty premium to own Shopify stock.\n\nIMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES.\nTeladoc Health: Implied upside of 40%\nTelemedicine giantTeladoc Health(NYSE:TDOC)has been exceptionally popular over the past year, for obvious reasons I'll touch on in a moment. According to Wall Street, shares of Teladoc could ascend past $250 over the next 12 months, giving it an implied upside of 40%.\nAs you can imagine, physicians wanted to keep at-risk people and potentially infected patients out of offices and hospitals if at all possible last year. This led to Teladoc handling almost 10.6 million virtual visits in 2020, up from around 4.1 million in the previous year.\nBut understand that telehealth is agame-changing healthcare modeland not just a one-year wonder because of the pandemic. It's far more convenient for patients, allows physicians to keep closer tabs on at-risk patients, and is usually billed at a lower rate than office visits, which health insurers love. These advantages are exactly why Teladoc's sales grew by an average annual rate of 74% between 2013 and 2019.\nFurthermore, Teladoc has a new toy, so to speak: Itacquired leading applied health signals company Livongo Healthin early November. Livongo leans on artificial intelligence to send tips and nudges to patients with chronic illnesses. These nudges help patients make behavioral changes that result in their leading healthier lives. The addition of Livongo makes Teladoc a veritable no-brainer buy.\n\nIMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES.\nSnowflake: Implied upside of 28%\nAnother high-growth stock with abundant upside according to Wall Street professionals is cloud data warehousing companySnowflake(NYSE:SNOW). After recently retracing to an all-time low, analysts see Snowflake gaining up to 28% to almost $301 a share over the next 12 months.\nAs I alluded to with Shopify, we're witnessing a big push by businesses online and into the cloud, which has been a boon for most cloud infrastructure companies. Despite the worst economic downturn in decades, Snowflake grew its product revenue by 120% to $553.8 million in fiscal 2021. Although it's losing a lot of money at the moment, the services Snowflake offers should yield juicy margins as the company matures.\nArguably the most interesting thing about Snowflake is itssustainable competitive advantages. For instance, it offers a pay-as-you-go model that shuns the subscriptions that SaaS stocks often covet. By allowing its customers to pay based on their storage needs and Snowflake Compute Credits used, it's offering a highly transparent and cost-effective operating model.\nEven better, its platform islayered atop the most popular cloud infrastructure solutions, which makes the sharing of information seamless, regardless of storage provider.\nSnowflake has some very big shoes to fill with its lofty valuation, but Wall Street believes the company can get it done.\n\nIMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES.\nDatadog: Implied upside of 35%\nHave I mentioned that Wall Street has a thing forSaaS stocks? In addition to Shopify and Snowflake, analysts believe that application monitoring solutions providerDatadog(NASDAQ:DDOG)could surge to $121 a share over the next year. This implies up to 35% upside in its shares.\nKeeping with the theme, Datadog looks to benefit from businesses completely shifting their strategy in the wake of the pandemic. With employees working remotely, it's become more important than ever that businesses stay on top of key metrics, oversee critical applications, and fully understand the behavior of their customers. Datadog's cloud-based solutions do all of this for its clients.\nWhat's been most impressive about Datadog is the company's ability to attract bigger clients. While a 46% increase in customers with at least $100,000 in annual recurring revenue (ARR) is nice, the \"wow\" number is the 94% increase in the number of customers generating at least $1 million in ARR. This is a big reason the company's sales shot 66% higher in 2020 to $603.5 million.\nSimilar to Snowflake, Datadog has a lot to prove with its lofty price-to-sales ratio. However, if it can continue to grow its sales by more than 30% annually, there'sno reason Wall Street's price target isn't within reach.\n\nIMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES.\nCoinbase: Implied upside of 56%\nFinally, recent initial public offeringCoinbase(NASDAQ:COIN)offers the highest perceived upside among these five fast-growing companies. Though there were only four price targets listed through this past weekend, a lofty target of $600 a share skewed the consensus up to $456 a share. This suggests Coinbase could gain 56% over the coming 12 months.\nThere's no doubt that Coinbase has benefited from the euphoria surrounding cryptocurrencies likeBitcoinand Ethereum. With both rallying to new highs this year, Coinbase recorded $1.8 billion in revenue in the first quarter. For some context, that's more revenue than it had generated in the previous 24 months combined!\nHowever, unlike the other popular companies listed here,Coinbase's advantages look flimsy, at best. It runs the risk of competing crypto brokerages undercutting its fees, which could reduce its operating margins and growth rate dramatically over time.\nFurthermore,its business model looks to be built upon euphoria rather than innovation. With most of its revenue coming from Bitcoin and Ethereum trading, it's worrisome to see what happens when the price of these key assets stops rising. In a two-year stretch where Bitcoin lost 80% of its value, Coinbase saw its revenue nearly get halved.\nIn sum, Wall Street may be bullish on Coinbase, but this Fool isn't.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":255,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":198310782,"gmtCreate":1620925137746,"gmtModify":1704350638110,"author":{"id":"3576837088119232","authorId":"3576837088119232","authorIdStr":"3576837088119232","name":"文氏","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13ab58f27225c31b03dde6b684f98f7e","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576837088119232"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Informative read","listText":"Informative read","text":"Informative read","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/198310782","repostId":"1116555518","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1116555518","pubTimestamp":1620913985,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1116555518?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-05-13 21:53","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why everyone from Elon Musk to Janet Yellen is worried about bitcoin’s energy usage","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1116555518","media":"cnbc","summary":"KEY POINTS\n\nElon Musk said Tesla had halted purchases of vehicles with bitcoin due to concerns over ","content":"<div>\n<p>KEY POINTS\n\nElon Musk said Tesla had halted purchases of vehicles with bitcoin due to concerns over the “rapidly increasing use of fossil fuels for bitcoin mining.”\nThe cryptocurrency uses more energy...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/05/13/why-elon-musk-is-worried-about-bitcoin-environmental-impact.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"cnbc_highlight","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why everyone from Elon Musk to Janet Yellen is worried about bitcoin’s energy usage</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy everyone from Elon Musk to Janet Yellen is worried about bitcoin’s energy usage\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-05-13 21:53 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.cnbc.com/2021/05/13/why-elon-musk-is-worried-about-bitcoin-environmental-impact.html><strong>cnbc</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>KEY POINTS\n\nElon Musk said Tesla had halted purchases of vehicles with bitcoin due to concerns over the “rapidly increasing use of fossil fuels for bitcoin mining.”\nThe cryptocurrency uses more energy...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/05/13/why-elon-musk-is-worried-about-bitcoin-environmental-impact.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"GBTC":"Grayscale Bitcoin Trust"},"source_url":"https://www.cnbc.com/2021/05/13/why-elon-musk-is-worried-about-bitcoin-environmental-impact.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/72bb72e1b84c09fca865c6dcb1bbcd16","article_id":"1116555518","content_text":"KEY POINTS\n\nElon Musk said Tesla had halted purchases of vehicles with bitcoin due to concerns over the “rapidly increasing use of fossil fuels for bitcoin mining.”\nThe cryptocurrency uses more energy than entire countries such as Sweden and Malaysia, according to researchers.\nTreasury Secretary Janet Yellen has also warned about bitcoin’s environmental impact, saying it uses a “staggering” amount of power.\n\nElon Musk’sdecision to stopTeslafrom acceptingbitcoinas payment has led to fresh scrutiny of the cryptocurrency’s environmental impact.\nMusksaid Wednesdaythat Tesla had halted purchases of its vehicles with bitcoin due to concerns over the “rapidly increasing use of fossil fuels for bitcoin mining.”\nHe alluded to data from researchers at Cambridge University which shows bitcoin’s electricity usage spiking this year.\nTesla won't sell its bitcoin — the automaker is sitting on$2.5 billion worthof the digital coin — and Musk said it intends to resume transactions with bitcoin once mining \"transitions to more sustainable energy.\"\n\"We are also looking at other cryptocurrencies that use <1% of Bitcoin's energy/transaction,\" Musk said.\nMusk's comments roiled cryptocurrency markets, which haveshed as much as $365.85 billion in valuesince his tweet.\nWhy is Musk worried?\nCritics ofbitcoinhave long been wary of its impact on the environment. The cryptocurrency uses more energy than entire countries such as Sweden and Malaysia, according to the Cambridge Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index.\nTo understand why bitcoin is so energy-intensive, you have to look at its underlying technology, the blockchain.\nBitcoin's public ledger is decentralized, meaning it isn't controlled by any single authority. It's constantly being updated by a network of computers around the world.\nSo-called miners run purpose-built computers to solve complex math puzzles in order to make a transaction go through. This is the only way to mint new bitcoins.\nMiners do not run this operation for free. They have to shell out huge sums on specialized equipment. A key incentive of bitcoin's model, known as \"proof of work,\" is the promise of being rewarded in some bitcoin if you manage to solve its complex hashing algorithm.\nIt's worth noting thatdogecoin, which has risen wildly in price lately on the back of support from Musk, also uses a proof-of-work mechanism.\nCarol Alexander, a professor at the University of Sussex Business School, explains that bitcoin's mining \"difficulty\" — a measure of the computational effort it takes to mine bitcoin — has been going \"up and up\" over the last three years.\n\"More and more electricity is being used,\" Alexander told CNBC. \"That means that the network difficulty will also be going up (and) more miners are coming in because the hash rate's going up.\"\nBitcoin's price is up almost 70% so far this year. As it goes up in price, the revenue to miners also increases, incentivizing more participants to mine the cryptocurrency.\nMeanwhile, Musk isn't the only one who's worried about the environmental impact of bitcoin. In February, Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen warned that the digital coin is \"extremely inefficient\" for making transactions and uses a \"staggering\" amount of power.\nDoes bitcoin actually harm the environment?\nIt's complicated. On the one hand, bitcoin's network uses anunfathomable amount of energy. Much of the mining of bitcoin is concentrated in China, whose economy is still heavily reliant on coal.\nLast month, a coal mine in the Xinjiang region flooded and shut down. This took nearly a quarter of bitcoin's hash rate — or computing power — offline, according to crypto industry publicationCoinDesk.\nIn March, China's Inner Mongolia region said it wouldshut down cryptocurrency mining operationsin the region due to concerns over energy consumption.\nOn the other side of the debate, bitcoin investors have attempted to push back on the narrative that it's harmful for the environment.\nWhile it's difficult to determine the energy mix that powers bitcoin, some in the crypto industry say miners are incentivized to use renewables as it's getting cheaper to produce them. In China, the province of Sichuan is known to attract miners due to its cheap electricity and rich hydropower resources.\nLast month,Jack Dorsey'sfintech companySquareand Cathie Wood's Ark Invest put out amemoclaiming that bitcoin will actually drive renewable energy innovation. However, critics said they had avested interestin doing so.\nAlexander said the debate around bitcoin's environmental impact was misguided as most transactions with the digital asset aren't happening on the blockchain.\n\"Almost all the trading is not done on the blockchain,\" she said. \"It's done on secondary markets, centralized exchanges. They're not even recorded on the blockchain.\"\nESG concerns\nRegardless of whether bitcoin is actually a polluter or not, the negative connotations around its energy consumption have worried investors conscious of companies' ethical and environmental responsibilities.\nESG, or environmental, social and corporate governance, has become agrowing trendin financial markets, with portfolio managers increasingly incorporating sustainable investments into their strategies.\nSome Tesla shareholders may be worried that the company is betting big on bitcoin while also claiming to be a green energy company.\n\"Bitcoin backers will be wondering where this leaves the future of the cryptocurrency,\" Laith Khalaf, a financial analyst at investment firm AJ Bell, said in a note Thursday.\n\"Environmental matters are an incredibly sensitive subject right now, and Tesla's move might serve as a wake-up call to businesses and consumers using Bitcoin, who hadn't hitherto considered its carbon footprint,\" Khalaf added.\n\"Tesla's decision certainly puts pressure on other big companies who accept Bitcoin to review their practices, because boardrooms will now be wary about getting it in the ear from ESG investors on the shareholder register.\"","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":278,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":191915440,"gmtCreate":1620833123680,"gmtModify":1704349136123,"author":{"id":"3576837088119232","authorId":"3576837088119232","authorIdStr":"3576837088119232","name":"文氏","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13ab58f27225c31b03dde6b684f98f7e","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576837088119232"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Red.....","listText":"Red.....","text":"Red.....","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/191915440","repostId":"1109603661","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1109603661","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1620826282,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1109603661?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-05-12 21:31","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Stocks take a hit as trading opens Wednesday, spooked by inflation data","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1109603661","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"(May 12) Stocks take a hit as trading opens Wednesday, spooked by inflation data. The Dow Jones Indu","content":"<p>(May 12)&nbsp;Stocks take a hit as trading opens Wednesday, spooked by inflation data.&nbsp;</p><p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell more than 150 points, following its worst day since February. The S&amp;P 500 lost 0.6%, while the tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite slid more than 1%.</p><p>Inflation acceleratedat its fastest pace since 2008 last month with the Consumer Price Index spiking 4.2% from a year ago, compared to the Dow Jones estimate for a 3.6% increase. The monthly gain was 0.8%, versus the expected 0.2%.</p><p>Excluding volatile food and energy prices, the core CPI increased 3% from the same period in 2020 and 0.9% on a monthly basis. The respective estimates were 2.3% and 0.3%.</p><p>“The markets have been hovering around all times highs with a lot of the reopening trade already priced in. So it’s not out of the question that the outsized inflation read could bring us back down to earth a bit,” said&nbsp;Mike Loewengart, managing director of investment strategy at E-Trade.</p><p>\"Keep in mind the Fed has made it clear that it won't let inflation increases necessarily sway it from its easy money policies and further any jumps like this could be transitory. So is this a trend? That remains to be seen,\" Loewengart said.</p><p>Tech shares, which have been under pressure this week and this month, were falling in the premarket again Wednesday. Shares of Alphabet, Microsoft, Netflix, Facebook and Apple all traded in the red, while shares of chipmakers Nvidia and AMD were also lower in the premarket.</p><p>Shares tied to the reopening also fell in the premarket. Carnival Corp, Boeing and United Airlines were lower in premarket trading.</p><p>The strength in bank stocks and energy shares in premarket helped support the broader market. JPMorgan rose 1%, while Occidental Petroleum climbed 1.4%. Chevron also traded higher.</p><p>The technology sector pulled off&nbsp;a big intraday reversal&nbsp;in the previous session where the Nasdaq Composite erased a loss north of 2% and ended the day flat. The blue-chip Dow, however, lost more than 450 points to suffer its worst day since February. The S&amp;P 500 slipped 0.9%, but avoided its second straight 1% loss.</p><p>The Technology Select Sector SPDR is off by more than 1% this week and 3% this month, as investors reassess the group's high valuations in the face of rising inflation.</p><p>During Tuesday's session, theCBOE Volatility Index, a measure of fear in the markets derived by option prices on the S&amp;P 500, jumped as high as 23.73, levels not seen in two months.&nbsp;The VIX was higher in early trading Wednesday.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Stocks take a hit as trading opens Wednesday, spooked by inflation data</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nStocks take a hit as trading opens Wednesday, spooked by inflation data\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-05-12 21:31</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>(May 12)&nbsp;Stocks take a hit as trading opens Wednesday, spooked by inflation data.&nbsp;</p><p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell more than 150 points, following its worst day since February. The S&amp;P 500 lost 0.6%, while the tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite slid more than 1%.</p><p>Inflation acceleratedat its fastest pace since 2008 last month with the Consumer Price Index spiking 4.2% from a year ago, compared to the Dow Jones estimate for a 3.6% increase. The monthly gain was 0.8%, versus the expected 0.2%.</p><p>Excluding volatile food and energy prices, the core CPI increased 3% from the same period in 2020 and 0.9% on a monthly basis. The respective estimates were 2.3% and 0.3%.</p><p>“The markets have been hovering around all times highs with a lot of the reopening trade already priced in. So it’s not out of the question that the outsized inflation read could bring us back down to earth a bit,” said&nbsp;Mike Loewengart, managing director of investment strategy at E-Trade.</p><p>\"Keep in mind the Fed has made it clear that it won't let inflation increases necessarily sway it from its easy money policies and further any jumps like this could be transitory. So is this a trend? That remains to be seen,\" Loewengart said.</p><p>Tech shares, which have been under pressure this week and this month, were falling in the premarket again Wednesday. Shares of Alphabet, Microsoft, Netflix, Facebook and Apple all traded in the red, while shares of chipmakers Nvidia and AMD were also lower in the premarket.</p><p>Shares tied to the reopening also fell in the premarket. Carnival Corp, Boeing and United Airlines were lower in premarket trading.</p><p>The strength in bank stocks and energy shares in premarket helped support the broader market. JPMorgan rose 1%, while Occidental Petroleum climbed 1.4%. Chevron also traded higher.</p><p>The technology sector pulled off&nbsp;a big intraday reversal&nbsp;in the previous session where the Nasdaq Composite erased a loss north of 2% and ended the day flat. The blue-chip Dow, however, lost more than 450 points to suffer its worst day since February. The S&amp;P 500 slipped 0.9%, but avoided its second straight 1% loss.</p><p>The Technology Select Sector SPDR is off by more than 1% this week and 3% this month, as investors reassess the group's high valuations in the face of rising inflation.</p><p>During Tuesday's session, theCBOE Volatility Index, a measure of fear in the markets derived by option prices on the S&amp;P 500, jumped as high as 23.73, levels not seen in two months.&nbsp;The VIX was higher in early trading Wednesday.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite","SPY":"标普500ETF",".DJI":"道琼斯",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1109603661","content_text":"(May 12) Stocks take a hit as trading opens Wednesday, spooked by inflation data. The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell more than 150 points, following its worst day since February. The S&P 500 lost 0.6%, while the tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite slid more than 1%.Inflation acceleratedat its fastest pace since 2008 last month with the Consumer Price Index spiking 4.2% from a year ago, compared to the Dow Jones estimate for a 3.6% increase. The monthly gain was 0.8%, versus the expected 0.2%.Excluding volatile food and energy prices, the core CPI increased 3% from the same period in 2020 and 0.9% on a monthly basis. The respective estimates were 2.3% and 0.3%.“The markets have been hovering around all times highs with a lot of the reopening trade already priced in. So it’s not out of the question that the outsized inflation read could bring us back down to earth a bit,” said Mike Loewengart, managing director of investment strategy at E-Trade.\"Keep in mind the Fed has made it clear that it won't let inflation increases necessarily sway it from its easy money policies and further any jumps like this could be transitory. So is this a trend? That remains to be seen,\" Loewengart said.Tech shares, which have been under pressure this week and this month, were falling in the premarket again Wednesday. Shares of Alphabet, Microsoft, Netflix, Facebook and Apple all traded in the red, while shares of chipmakers Nvidia and AMD were also lower in the premarket.Shares tied to the reopening also fell in the premarket. Carnival Corp, Boeing and United Airlines were lower in premarket trading.The strength in bank stocks and energy shares in premarket helped support the broader market. JPMorgan rose 1%, while Occidental Petroleum climbed 1.4%. Chevron also traded higher.The technology sector pulled off a big intraday reversal in the previous session where the Nasdaq Composite erased a loss north of 2% and ended the day flat. The blue-chip Dow, however, lost more than 450 points to suffer its worst day since February. The S&P 500 slipped 0.9%, but avoided its second straight 1% loss.The Technology Select Sector SPDR is off by more than 1% this week and 3% this month, as investors reassess the group's high valuations in the face of rising inflation.During Tuesday's session, theCBOE Volatility Index, a measure of fear in the markets derived by option prices on the S&P 500, jumped as high as 23.73, levels not seen in two months. The VIX was higher in early trading Wednesday.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":361,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[{"author":{"id":"3578484590506261","authorId":"3578484590506261","authorIdStr":"3578484590506261","name":"AkiraAizawa","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c26b60916777def45d34dbe72f0a1c69","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3578484590506261"},"content":"I understand how you feel","text":"I understand how you feel","html":"I understand how you feel"}],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":106713370,"gmtCreate":1620144731590,"gmtModify":1704339343615,"author":{"id":"3576837088119232","authorId":"3576837088119232","authorIdStr":"3576837088119232","name":"文氏","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13ab58f27225c31b03dde6b684f98f7e","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576837088119232"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Omg&nbsp;","listText":"Omg&nbsp;","text":"Omg","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/106713370","repostId":"1195636027","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1195636027","pubTimestamp":1620137110,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1195636027?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-05-04 22:05","market":"us","language":"en","title":"\"It Could Get Weird\": Stocks Puke As \"Extreme\" Negative Gamma Strikes","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1195636027","media":"zerohedge","summary":"Just like late February when we had the firstinflation scare-cum-Treasury tantrum,Tech is breaking d","content":"<p>Just like late February when we had the first<i>inflation scare-cum-Treasury tantrum,</i>Tech is breaking down, and look no further than Amazon for the evidence.</p>\n<p>In just the three days since reporting blowout Q1 earnings which sent its stock to a new all time high, AMZN stock is down over 9% and is on the verge of a correction. Other FAAMGs, most notably Apple which had a just as impressive quarter, are not faring any better.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c89d66b1ced8ac68b5fb3ff40b54f134\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"240\"></p>\n<p>However, unlike late February when tech was monkeyhammered mostly as a result of sharply surging yields, this time there is the double whammy of deeply negative gamma.</p>\n<p>AsSpotGamma wrote overnight, \"both SPY &amp; QQQ remain in negative gamma territory which implies higher relative volatility.\"</p>\n<p>Nomura's resident x-asset expert, Chalie McElligott, picks on this and in a note this morning writes that while \"there is nothing exceedingly bulky or “whale-like” by itself\", there has<b>\"been a pick-up with broad Vol / Gamma selling from clients in recent weeks.\"</b>The details:</p>\n<ul>\n <li>This has show via standard overwriter flows in singles and index, but also to the systematic strangle-selling mentioned in the press last week (which looks like the odd-lottish flows in ratios that trade ~3-4x’s a week, while there too is a separate daily overwriter program in one month straddles for example)…<b>all of which has contributed to what has been a very “long gamma” dynamic for Dealers—and thus the “stuck” S&amp;P for about three weeks, pinging around the gravity of the big strikes at 4150-4200</b></li>\n <li>The %ile rank of the overall $Gamma magnitude across US Equities index has come-off after recent expirations (SPX / SPY consolidated now a middling 56.6%ile $Gamma / IWM 35.9%ile; EEM 37.4%ile); however,<b>Nasdaq / QQQ’s continue to be the epicenter for how broad index movement could get weird, with -$435.8mm $Gamma which is extremely negative at just 3.8%ile</b></li>\n</ul>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0dbb4e73ce8bc66785a7aa43170b3dc3\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"648\">Needless to say, negative QQQ gamma + tech selloff = explosive combination, and as McElligott summarizes, \"with this “extreme” negative $Gamma in QQQ,<b>we see Dealers increasingly moving into “short Gamma vs spot” territory as well</b>(Gamma “neutral line” at 339.36 vs spot 333.55); similarly, we currently see Dealers “short Gamma vs spot” too in both IWM (226.19 “neutral line” vs 224.79 spot) and EEM (54.29 “neutral line” vs spot 53.59)\"</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c7be1b134edacd8fc5831a10f026c1d2\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"311\">Tech's inability to breakout higher has crippled sentiment, and as the Nomura quant concludes, following what had been a strong recovery in April for the Tech sector and “Secular Growth” (aided by the stabilization in USTs and relative “bull-flattening” off the extremes of the March Rates selloff / “bear-steepening”) \"our Nomura Sector Sentiment analysis shows that WoW, we have seen Tech sector sentiment collapse (again)--with an 85.1%ile score a week ago, but today printing down at 53.9%\"</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/938a77b986fc7fbbd0450254e29b7dce\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"277\">And as the tech revulsion spreads, dragging Nasdaq lower...</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/35406354f6f369f0aa382d819a26ea4e\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"260\">... it is starting to hit broader indexesm such as the S&amp;P and Russell...</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0d50bd11171fa55adf45caf3cf0ab389\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"285\">... which just dipped below its 50dma.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5b8200d703a1c2d305811eadd35af3c3\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"227\"></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>\"It Could Get Weird\": Stocks Puke As \"Extreme\" Negative Gamma Strikes</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n\"It Could Get Weird\": Stocks Puke As \"Extreme\" Negative Gamma Strikes\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-05-04 22:05 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/it-could-get-weird-stocks-puke-extreme-negative-gamma-strikes?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29><strong>zerohedge</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Just like late February when we had the firstinflation scare-cum-Treasury tantrum,Tech is breaking down, and look no further than Amazon for the evidence.\nIn just the three days since reporting ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/it-could-get-weird-stocks-puke-extreme-negative-gamma-strikes?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".DJI":"道琼斯","SPY":"标普500ETF"},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/it-could-get-weird-stocks-puke-extreme-negative-gamma-strikes?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1195636027","content_text":"Just like late February when we had the firstinflation scare-cum-Treasury tantrum,Tech is breaking down, and look no further than Amazon for the evidence.\nIn just the three days since reporting blowout Q1 earnings which sent its stock to a new all time high, AMZN stock is down over 9% and is on the verge of a correction. Other FAAMGs, most notably Apple which had a just as impressive quarter, are not faring any better.\n\nHowever, unlike late February when tech was monkeyhammered mostly as a result of sharply surging yields, this time there is the double whammy of deeply negative gamma.\nAsSpotGamma wrote overnight, \"both SPY & QQQ remain in negative gamma territory which implies higher relative volatility.\"\nNomura's resident x-asset expert, Chalie McElligott, picks on this and in a note this morning writes that while \"there is nothing exceedingly bulky or “whale-like” by itself\", there has\"been a pick-up with broad Vol / Gamma selling from clients in recent weeks.\"The details:\n\nThis has show via standard overwriter flows in singles and index, but also to the systematic strangle-selling mentioned in the press last week (which looks like the odd-lottish flows in ratios that trade ~3-4x’s a week, while there too is a separate daily overwriter program in one month straddles for example)…all of which has contributed to what has been a very “long gamma” dynamic for Dealers—and thus the “stuck” S&P for about three weeks, pinging around the gravity of the big strikes at 4150-4200\nThe %ile rank of the overall $Gamma magnitude across US Equities index has come-off after recent expirations (SPX / SPY consolidated now a middling 56.6%ile $Gamma / IWM 35.9%ile; EEM 37.4%ile); however,Nasdaq / QQQ’s continue to be the epicenter for how broad index movement could get weird, with -$435.8mm $Gamma which is extremely negative at just 3.8%ile\n\nNeedless to say, negative QQQ gamma + tech selloff = explosive combination, and as McElligott summarizes, \"with this “extreme” negative $Gamma in QQQ,we see Dealers increasingly moving into “short Gamma vs spot” territory as well(Gamma “neutral line” at 339.36 vs spot 333.55); similarly, we currently see Dealers “short Gamma vs spot” too in both IWM (226.19 “neutral line” vs 224.79 spot) and EEM (54.29 “neutral line” vs spot 53.59)\"\nTech's inability to breakout higher has crippled sentiment, and as the Nomura quant concludes, following what had been a strong recovery in April for the Tech sector and “Secular Growth” (aided by the stabilization in USTs and relative “bull-flattening” off the extremes of the March Rates selloff / “bear-steepening”) \"our Nomura Sector Sentiment analysis shows that WoW, we have seen Tech sector sentiment collapse (again)--with an 85.1%ile score a week ago, but today printing down at 53.9%\"\nAnd as the tech revulsion spreads, dragging Nasdaq lower...\n... it is starting to hit broader indexesm such as the S&P and Russell...\n... which just dipped below its 50dma.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":321,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":106708147,"gmtCreate":1620142797889,"gmtModify":1704339303893,"author":{"id":"3576837088119232","authorId":"3576837088119232","authorIdStr":"3576837088119232","name":"文氏","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13ab58f27225c31b03dde6b684f98f7e","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576837088119232"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Covid was no where near over but people forgot that ..&nbsp;","listText":"Covid was no where near over but people forgot that ..&nbsp;","text":"Covid was no where near over but people forgot that ..","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/106708147","repostId":"1142616846","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":493,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":198319589,"gmtCreate":1620925209241,"gmtModify":1704350638598,"author":{"id":"3576837088119232","authorId":"3576837088119232","authorIdStr":"3576837088119232","name":"文氏","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13ab58f27225c31b03dde6b684f98f7e","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576837088119232"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Stuck","listText":"Stuck","text":"Stuck","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/198319589","repostId":"1196862271","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1196862271","pubTimestamp":1620919313,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1196862271?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-05-13 23:21","market":"us","language":"en","title":"The Last Two Times This Hit, Stocks Dropped 20% and 50%, Respectively","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1196862271","media":"zerohedge","summary":"In our last article, I outlined how the rise in inflation has slammed Tech stocks lower.\nBy way of a","content":"<p>In our last article, I outlined how the rise in inflation has slammed Tech stocks lower.</p>\n<p>By way of a quick review, Tech, as represented by the NASDAQ is highly sensitive to inflation on an inverse relationship: when inflation rises, Tech stocks collapse and when inflation falls, Tech stocks erupt higher.</p>\n<p>The reason for this is that much of Tech investing is based on growth rates. And if bond yields rise as a result of inflation, bonds become more attractive as an investment, taking away from the appeal of Tech.</p>\n<p>As I noted yesterday. as inflation entered the financial system in 2020 and began to accelerate in 2021, Tech stocks have struggled. You can see this in the chart below (red rectangle).</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6366a605a86374ef9af9de07ae828fd4\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"606\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">So, we know that Tech is going to struggle going forward as inflation heats up. But what about the broader market like the S&amp;P 500? Will it collapse too?</p>\n<p>To figure that out, let’s take a look at the last two inflationary scares in the U.S.</p>\n<p>The most recent scare occurred in 2010-2011. At that time, the Fed was pretty quick on the uptake and decided to allow its QE 2 program (the cause of the inflationary spike) to end.</p>\n<p>The Fed then waited several months before introducing any new monetary programs. And when it did introduce one, it didn’t involve money printing (instead the Fed used the proceeds from Treasury sales to buy long-date Treasuries through a process called Operation Twist). This was a kind of stealth tightening.</p>\n<p>Stocks didn’t like this, collapsing nearly 20%.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1fdf95bc30276d330c4bd7a5f62b10d2\" tg-width=\"620\" tg-height=\"376\"></p>\n<p>Bear in mind, that was a relatively minor inflationary scare. During the last legitimate inflationary storm in the 1970s-1980s.</p>\n<p>During that mess, the Fed was forced to be MUCH more aggressive with its tightening, embarking on two aggressive tightening schedules. It’s worth noting that this triggered two SEVERE recessions (shaded areas).</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6f6ed1ada17beb2066d0017b576e64cc\" tg-width=\"1168\" tg-height=\"450\"></p>\n<p>This IMPLODED the stock market, resulting in a roughly 50% decline over the course of 18 months.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3b38c35b81a872044b03ce49014d5e46\" tg-width=\"620\" tg-height=\"376\"></p>\n<p>So, what will it be this time? Will the Fed engage in a stealth taper as was the case in 2011… or will it tighten monetary policy aggressively as it did in the 1970s and 1980s?</p>\n<p>We’ll address that in our next article.</p>\n<p>in the meantime, we just published a Special Investment Report concerning FIVE secret investments you can use to make inflation&nbsp;<b>pay you</b>&nbsp;as it rips through the financial system in the months ahead.</p>\n<p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>The Last Two Times This Hit, Stocks Dropped 20% and 50%, Respectively</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nThe Last Two Times This Hit, Stocks Dropped 20% and 50%, Respectively\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-05-13 23:21 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2021-05-13/last-two-times-hit-stocks-dropped-20-and-50-respectively><strong>zerohedge</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>In our last article, I outlined how the rise in inflation has slammed Tech stocks lower.\nBy way of a quick review, Tech, as represented by the NASDAQ is highly sensitive to inflation on an inverse ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2021-05-13/last-two-times-hit-stocks-dropped-20-and-50-respectively\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SPY":"标普500ETF",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2021-05-13/last-two-times-hit-stocks-dropped-20-and-50-respectively","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1196862271","content_text":"In our last article, I outlined how the rise in inflation has slammed Tech stocks lower.\nBy way of a quick review, Tech, as represented by the NASDAQ is highly sensitive to inflation on an inverse relationship: when inflation rises, Tech stocks collapse and when inflation falls, Tech stocks erupt higher.\nThe reason for this is that much of Tech investing is based on growth rates. And if bond yields rise as a result of inflation, bonds become more attractive as an investment, taking away from the appeal of Tech.\nAs I noted yesterday. as inflation entered the financial system in 2020 and began to accelerate in 2021, Tech stocks have struggled. You can see this in the chart below (red rectangle).\nSo, we know that Tech is going to struggle going forward as inflation heats up. But what about the broader market like the S&P 500? Will it collapse too?\nTo figure that out, let’s take a look at the last two inflationary scares in the U.S.\nThe most recent scare occurred in 2010-2011. At that time, the Fed was pretty quick on the uptake and decided to allow its QE 2 program (the cause of the inflationary spike) to end.\nThe Fed then waited several months before introducing any new monetary programs. And when it did introduce one, it didn’t involve money printing (instead the Fed used the proceeds from Treasury sales to buy long-date Treasuries through a process called Operation Twist). This was a kind of stealth tightening.\nStocks didn’t like this, collapsing nearly 20%.\n\nBear in mind, that was a relatively minor inflationary scare. During the last legitimate inflationary storm in the 1970s-1980s.\nDuring that mess, the Fed was forced to be MUCH more aggressive with its tightening, embarking on two aggressive tightening schedules. It’s worth noting that this triggered two SEVERE recessions (shaded areas).\n\nThis IMPLODED the stock market, resulting in a roughly 50% decline over the course of 18 months.\nSo, what will it be this time? Will the Fed engage in a stealth taper as was the case in 2011… or will it tighten monetary policy aggressively as it did in the 1970s and 1980s?\nWe’ll address that in our next article.\nin the meantime, we just published a Special Investment Report concerning FIVE secret investments you can use to make inflation pay you as it rips through the financial system in the months ahead.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":271,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":193954396,"gmtCreate":1620747711515,"gmtModify":1704347842456,"author":{"id":"3576837088119232","authorId":"3576837088119232","authorIdStr":"3576837088119232","name":"文氏","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13ab58f27225c31b03dde6b684f98f7e","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576837088119232"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Oh mannnn..worrying&nbsp;","listText":"Oh mannnn..worrying&nbsp;","text":"Oh mannnn..worrying","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/193954396","repostId":"1185197052","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1185197052","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1620739869,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1185197052?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-05-11 21:31","market":"us","language":"en","title":"U.S. stocks slump at Tuesday's open as inflation fears continue to buffett tech stocks","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1185197052","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"(May 11) U.S. stocks slump at Tuesday's open as inflation fears continue to buffett tech stocks. Nas","content":"<p>(May 11)&nbsp;U.S. stocks slump at Tuesday's open as inflation fears continue to buffett tech stocks.&nbsp;Nasdaq sheds another 2% as Big Tech sell-off intensifies, Dow drops nearly&nbsp;300 points.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/23aa647034a4b0db21395b6761549e8b\" tg-width=\"1242\" tg-height=\"541\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">Big Tech stocks were all in the red once again Tuesday. Apple dropped nearly 3%, while Facebook, Alphabet and Amazon were all down more than 2% in premarket trading.</p><p>Tesla shares, the poster boy for growth stocks with lofty valuations and expectations,&nbsp;fell nearly 7% in premarket trading. A Reuters report that the electric carmaker halted plans to expand its Shanghai plant into an export hub, also aided the decline.</p><p>“It was an intensification and acceleration in money rotating towards sectors that are more exposed to 1) An economic reflation (so cyclicals) and 2) Rising inflation,” Tom Essaye, founder of Sevens Report, said in a note.</p><p>Tech shares, which were the biggest pandemic winners, fell out of favor earlier this year as fears of inflation and higher interest rates crept up. Growth-oriented companies tend to get hit hard by rising rates as they erode the value of their future earnings.</p><p>The latest headlines including a labor shortage as well as a jump in Consumer Price Index in March helped fuel inflation worries and accelerate selling of tech shares.</p><p>Big Tech got clobbered on Monday as investors exited stocks likeAppleandMicrosoft, dragging the Dow Jones Industrial Average and the S&amp;P 500 off their record highs in the process. Both of those stocks lost at least 2% to start the week.</p><p>The Nasdaq Composite suffered the worse of the selling and fell 2.5%, finishing the day at its session low on Monday. Facebook lost more than 4%, while Amazon and Netflix both dropped over 3%.Alphabetdipped more than 2% after a downgrade by Citigroup. Cathie Wood’s Ark Innovation ETF fell 5% toits lowest level since NovemberasTesla, its top holding, shed more than 6%.</p><p>The ARK Innovation ETF was down another 4% in premarket trading Tuesday.</p><p>The market is divided in May with the Nasdaq Composite down 4% and the Dow up 2.5% as investors rotate away from growth shares with relatively high valuations into value stocks that will benefit from the economy reopening from the pandemic and higher inflation.</p><p>The Technology Select SPDR (XLK) is down 3% so far in May, the worst of any of the market sectors. The XLK was down another 1.3% in premarket trading Tuesday.</p><p>The broader S&amp;P 500 has managed to remain barely in the green for May amid this market rotation, but it may lose that gain if the tech selling intensifies and value stocks don’t pick up the slack.</p><p>Simon Property Groupsaw its stock retreat about 3% in the premarket despite better-than-expected numbers. The real estate property manager reported first-quarter earnings of $1.36 per share on revenues of $1.15 billion.</p><p>The Labor Department will on Tuesday publish the latest results of its Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey. Several high-ranking Federal Reserve officials, including Governor Lael Brainard and New York Fed President John Williams, are also scheduled to deliver remarks.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>U.S. stocks slump at Tuesday's open as inflation fears continue to buffett tech stocks</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nU.S. stocks slump at Tuesday's open as inflation fears continue to buffett tech stocks\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-05-11 21:31</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>(May 11)&nbsp;U.S. stocks slump at Tuesday's open as inflation fears continue to buffett tech stocks.&nbsp;Nasdaq sheds another 2% as Big Tech sell-off intensifies, Dow drops nearly&nbsp;300 points.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/23aa647034a4b0db21395b6761549e8b\" tg-width=\"1242\" tg-height=\"541\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">Big Tech stocks were all in the red once again Tuesday. Apple dropped nearly 3%, while Facebook, Alphabet and Amazon were all down more than 2% in premarket trading.</p><p>Tesla shares, the poster boy for growth stocks with lofty valuations and expectations,&nbsp;fell nearly 7% in premarket trading. A Reuters report that the electric carmaker halted plans to expand its Shanghai plant into an export hub, also aided the decline.</p><p>“It was an intensification and acceleration in money rotating towards sectors that are more exposed to 1) An economic reflation (so cyclicals) and 2) Rising inflation,” Tom Essaye, founder of Sevens Report, said in a note.</p><p>Tech shares, which were the biggest pandemic winners, fell out of favor earlier this year as fears of inflation and higher interest rates crept up. Growth-oriented companies tend to get hit hard by rising rates as they erode the value of their future earnings.</p><p>The latest headlines including a labor shortage as well as a jump in Consumer Price Index in March helped fuel inflation worries and accelerate selling of tech shares.</p><p>Big Tech got clobbered on Monday as investors exited stocks likeAppleandMicrosoft, dragging the Dow Jones Industrial Average and the S&amp;P 500 off their record highs in the process. Both of those stocks lost at least 2% to start the week.</p><p>The Nasdaq Composite suffered the worse of the selling and fell 2.5%, finishing the day at its session low on Monday. Facebook lost more than 4%, while Amazon and Netflix both dropped over 3%.Alphabetdipped more than 2% after a downgrade by Citigroup. Cathie Wood’s Ark Innovation ETF fell 5% toits lowest level since NovemberasTesla, its top holding, shed more than 6%.</p><p>The ARK Innovation ETF was down another 4% in premarket trading Tuesday.</p><p>The market is divided in May with the Nasdaq Composite down 4% and the Dow up 2.5% as investors rotate away from growth shares with relatively high valuations into value stocks that will benefit from the economy reopening from the pandemic and higher inflation.</p><p>The Technology Select SPDR (XLK) is down 3% so far in May, the worst of any of the market sectors. The XLK was down another 1.3% in premarket trading Tuesday.</p><p>The broader S&amp;P 500 has managed to remain barely in the green for May amid this market rotation, but it may lose that gain if the tech selling intensifies and value stocks don’t pick up the slack.</p><p>Simon Property Groupsaw its stock retreat about 3% in the premarket despite better-than-expected numbers. The real estate property manager reported first-quarter earnings of $1.36 per share on revenues of $1.15 billion.</p><p>The Labor Department will on Tuesday publish the latest results of its Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey. Several high-ranking Federal Reserve officials, including Governor Lael Brainard and New York Fed President John Williams, are also scheduled to deliver remarks.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯","SPY":"标普500ETF",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1185197052","content_text":"(May 11) U.S. stocks slump at Tuesday's open as inflation fears continue to buffett tech stocks. Nasdaq sheds another 2% as Big Tech sell-off intensifies, Dow drops nearly 300 points.Big Tech stocks were all in the red once again Tuesday. Apple dropped nearly 3%, while Facebook, Alphabet and Amazon were all down more than 2% in premarket trading.Tesla shares, the poster boy for growth stocks with lofty valuations and expectations, fell nearly 7% in premarket trading. A Reuters report that the electric carmaker halted plans to expand its Shanghai plant into an export hub, also aided the decline.“It was an intensification and acceleration in money rotating towards sectors that are more exposed to 1) An economic reflation (so cyclicals) and 2) Rising inflation,” Tom Essaye, founder of Sevens Report, said in a note.Tech shares, which were the biggest pandemic winners, fell out of favor earlier this year as fears of inflation and higher interest rates crept up. Growth-oriented companies tend to get hit hard by rising rates as they erode the value of their future earnings.The latest headlines including a labor shortage as well as a jump in Consumer Price Index in March helped fuel inflation worries and accelerate selling of tech shares.Big Tech got clobbered on Monday as investors exited stocks likeAppleandMicrosoft, dragging the Dow Jones Industrial Average and the S&P 500 off their record highs in the process. Both of those stocks lost at least 2% to start the week.The Nasdaq Composite suffered the worse of the selling and fell 2.5%, finishing the day at its session low on Monday. Facebook lost more than 4%, while Amazon and Netflix both dropped over 3%.Alphabetdipped more than 2% after a downgrade by Citigroup. Cathie Wood’s Ark Innovation ETF fell 5% toits lowest level since NovemberasTesla, its top holding, shed more than 6%.The ARK Innovation ETF was down another 4% in premarket trading Tuesday.The market is divided in May with the Nasdaq Composite down 4% and the Dow up 2.5% as investors rotate away from growth shares with relatively high valuations into value stocks that will benefit from the economy reopening from the pandemic and higher inflation.The Technology Select SPDR (XLK) is down 3% so far in May, the worst of any of the market sectors. The XLK was down another 1.3% in premarket trading Tuesday.The broader S&P 500 has managed to remain barely in the green for May amid this market rotation, but it may lose that gain if the tech selling intensifies and value stocks don’t pick up the slack.Simon Property Groupsaw its stock retreat about 3% in the premarket despite better-than-expected numbers. The real estate property manager reported first-quarter earnings of $1.36 per share on revenues of $1.15 billion.The Labor Department will on Tuesday publish the latest results of its Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey. Several high-ranking Federal Reserve officials, including Governor Lael Brainard and New York Fed President John Williams, are also scheduled to deliver remarks.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":125,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":106703402,"gmtCreate":1620142691606,"gmtModify":1704339301935,"author":{"id":"3576837088119232","authorId":"3576837088119232","authorIdStr":"3576837088119232","name":"文氏","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13ab58f27225c31b03dde6b684f98f7e","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576837088119232"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ahhh..","listText":"Ahhh..","text":"Ahhh..","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/106703402","repostId":"1107772617","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1107772617","pubTimestamp":1620139709,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1107772617?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-05-04 22:48","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Opinion: Why you should worry about the flood of new cash into U.S. stock funds","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1107772617","media":"MarketWatch","summary":"With investments, popular is not better.U.S. stock funds now are riding a river of new cash from inv","content":"<blockquote><b>With investments, popular is not better.</b></blockquote><p>U.S. stock funds now are riding a river of new cash from investors — and that is not a bullish sign.</p><p>Many investors might see this differently — that a huge influx of cash is positive. In fact, fund flows are a contrarian indicator: the U.S. stock market in the past has performed better when there is a net outflow of cash.</p><p>The evidence is summarized in the chart below, which plots net inflows of cash to U.S. stock funds (both open-end and exchange-traded funds) by year over the past decade. Notice that in all but two of the years since 2010 there have been net outflows.</p><p><b>Reversal</b></p><p>Net flows into U.S. equity (open-endded funds and ETF), in billions</p><p></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0c9c4ef1e3533acd3d248af32cdf728f\" tg-width=\"780\" tg-height=\"308\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>This 2010-2020 period was extremely strong for U.S. stocks. Yet over this time U.S. stock funds experienced a net outflow of $741 billion. (Data are from TrimTabs, a part of EPFR, a division of Informa Financial Intelligence.)</p><p>This year so far is seeing a major reversal of this longer-term trend. For the first four months of this year, according to TrimTabs, U.S. equity funds have received net inflows of $142.3 billion. If this pace were to continue for the full year, there would be $427 billion of net inflows in 2021 — retracing more than half the total outflow from 2010 through 2020.</p><p>One study that puts this huge year-to-date inflow in a bearish light appeared last December in the Review of Finance. Entitled “ETF Arbitrage, Non-Fundamental Demand, and Return Predictability,” the study was conducted by David Brown of the University of Arizona, Shaun William Davies of the University of Colorado Boulder and Matthew Ringgenberg of the University of Utah. The researchers found that, on average, the ETFs with the biggest outflows outperformed the ETFs with the biggest inflows for up to a year after these extreme flows.</p><p>Another academic study that reached a similar conclusion has been circulating since January. Entitled “Competition for Attention in the ETF Space,” the study was conducted by Itzhak Ben-David and Byungwook Kim of Ohio State University, Francesco Franzoni of the University of Lugano in Switzerland and Rabih Moussawi of Villanova University. The researchers focused on the specialized ETFs that are created to capitalize on investor fads and market trends, and which typically receive a big influx of cash soon after launch. They found that these ETFs over their first five years after launch lag the market on a risk-adjusted basis by 5% per year on average.</p><p>The tenuous relationship between performance and fund flows is evident also in the accompanying tables. The first lists the 10 ETFs with the best year-to-date returns. The second table lists the 10 ETFs with the largest net inflows. (Return data are from FactSet; flow data are from CFRA Research).</p><p>Notice that none of the funds in the first table appears in the second.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a2e0354f1f5c9cfd5611c3f6e03c3cee\" tg-width=\"887\" tg-height=\"497\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a5cd98cfa89435ba9ae4a0bfdedd3891\" tg-width=\"830\" tg-height=\"447\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>","source":"lsy1603348471595","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Opinion: Why you should worry about the flood of new cash into U.S. stock funds</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nOpinion: Why you should worry about the flood of new cash into U.S. stock funds\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-05-04 22:48 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.marketwatch.com/story/why-you-should-worry-about-the-flood-of-new-cash-into-u-s-stock-funds-11620102925?mod=home-page><strong>MarketWatch</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>With investments, popular is not better.U.S. stock funds now are riding a river of new cash from investors — and that is not a bullish sign.Many investors might see this differently — that a huge ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/why-you-should-worry-about-the-flood-of-new-cash-into-u-s-stock-funds-11620102925?mod=home-page\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite","SPY":"标普500ETF",".DJI":"道琼斯",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index"},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/why-you-should-worry-about-the-flood-of-new-cash-into-u-s-stock-funds-11620102925?mod=home-page","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1107772617","content_text":"With investments, popular is not better.U.S. stock funds now are riding a river of new cash from investors — and that is not a bullish sign.Many investors might see this differently — that a huge influx of cash is positive. In fact, fund flows are a contrarian indicator: the U.S. stock market in the past has performed better when there is a net outflow of cash.The evidence is summarized in the chart below, which plots net inflows of cash to U.S. stock funds (both open-end and exchange-traded funds) by year over the past decade. Notice that in all but two of the years since 2010 there have been net outflows.ReversalNet flows into U.S. equity (open-endded funds and ETF), in billionsThis 2010-2020 period was extremely strong for U.S. stocks. Yet over this time U.S. stock funds experienced a net outflow of $741 billion. (Data are from TrimTabs, a part of EPFR, a division of Informa Financial Intelligence.)This year so far is seeing a major reversal of this longer-term trend. For the first four months of this year, according to TrimTabs, U.S. equity funds have received net inflows of $142.3 billion. If this pace were to continue for the full year, there would be $427 billion of net inflows in 2021 — retracing more than half the total outflow from 2010 through 2020.One study that puts this huge year-to-date inflow in a bearish light appeared last December in the Review of Finance. Entitled “ETF Arbitrage, Non-Fundamental Demand, and Return Predictability,” the study was conducted by David Brown of the University of Arizona, Shaun William Davies of the University of Colorado Boulder and Matthew Ringgenberg of the University of Utah. The researchers found that, on average, the ETFs with the biggest outflows outperformed the ETFs with the biggest inflows for up to a year after these extreme flows.Another academic study that reached a similar conclusion has been circulating since January. Entitled “Competition for Attention in the ETF Space,” the study was conducted by Itzhak Ben-David and Byungwook Kim of Ohio State University, Francesco Franzoni of the University of Lugano in Switzerland and Rabih Moussawi of Villanova University. The researchers focused on the specialized ETFs that are created to capitalize on investor fads and market trends, and which typically receive a big influx of cash soon after launch. They found that these ETFs over their first five years after launch lag the market on a risk-adjusted basis by 5% per year on average.The tenuous relationship between performance and fund flows is evident also in the accompanying tables. The first lists the 10 ETFs with the best year-to-date returns. The second table lists the 10 ETFs with the largest net inflows. (Return data are from FactSet; flow data are from CFRA Research).Notice that none of the funds in the first table appears in the second.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":357,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":348155095,"gmtCreate":1617896179017,"gmtModify":1704704598269,"author":{"id":"3576837088119232","authorId":"3576837088119232","authorIdStr":"3576837088119232","name":"文氏","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13ab58f27225c31b03dde6b684f98f7e","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576837088119232"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SPOT\">$Spotify Technology S.A.(SPOT)$</a>went in too early, before the adjustments..=(","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SPOT\">$Spotify Technology S.A.(SPOT)$</a>went in too early, before the adjustments..=(","text":"$Spotify Technology S.A.(SPOT)$went in too early, before the adjustments..=(","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/348155095","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":273,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":343238667,"gmtCreate":1617717837959,"gmtModify":1704702203654,"author":{"id":"3576837088119232","authorId":"3576837088119232","authorIdStr":"3576837088119232","name":"文氏","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13ab58f27225c31b03dde6b684f98f7e","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576837088119232"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">$Tesla Motors(TSLA)$</a>motoring please","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">$Tesla Motors(TSLA)$</a>motoring please","text":"$Tesla Motors(TSLA)$motoring please","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/343238667","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":127,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":343208975,"gmtCreate":1617716910097,"gmtModify":1704702174366,"author":{"id":"3576837088119232","authorId":"3576837088119232","authorIdStr":"3576837088119232","name":"文氏","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13ab58f27225c31b03dde6b684f98f7e","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576837088119232"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">$Tesla Motors(TSLA)$</a>please moon","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">$Tesla Motors(TSLA)$</a>please moon","text":"$Tesla Motors(TSLA)$please moon","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/343208975","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":104,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":106713766,"gmtCreate":1620144803055,"gmtModify":1704339344926,"author":{"id":"3576837088119232","authorId":"3576837088119232","authorIdStr":"3576837088119232","name":"文氏","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13ab58f27225c31b03dde6b684f98f7e","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576837088119232"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Not surprising","listText":"Not surprising","text":"Not surprising","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/106713766","repostId":"1174922086","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":329,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":106706972,"gmtCreate":1620142856796,"gmtModify":1704339305205,"author":{"id":"3576837088119232","authorId":"3576837088119232","authorIdStr":"3576837088119232","name":"文氏","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13ab58f27225c31b03dde6b684f98f7e","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576837088119232"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"I'm not so sure","listText":"I'm not so sure","text":"I'm not so sure","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/106706972","repostId":"2132178325","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2132178325","pubTimestamp":1620129867,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2132178325?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-05-04 20:04","market":"us","language":"en","title":"3 Stocks to Buy When the Next Market Crash Comes","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2132178325","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"These quality stocks are expensive, so if the market crashes, jump on the opportunity to buy them at a discount.","content":"<p>The stock market has been soaring for a good year since it&nbsp;plummeted last March. Market crash predictions are common, and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE\">one</a> of these days, <i>it will happen</i>. The broad market outperformance has been out of sync with the global economic situation, and it does feel like the bubble could burst at any moment.</p>\n<p>In such a situation, investors should buy shares of <b>Lemonade</b> (NYSE:LMND), <b>Airbnb</b> (NASDAQ:ABNB), and <b>Fiverr</b> (NYSE:FVRR). They carry rich premiums as of this writing, but in the fallout of a broad market downturn, they should be at the top of your watchlist.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ed4e36321270d032e6043a5374300bba\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"465\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>Image source: Getty Images.</p>\n<p><b>Appealing to a new generation of insurance buyers</b></p>\n<p>Lemonade has been around since 2016, selling renters and homeowners insurance, and it dazzled investors during its market debut last July. Shares more than doubled from their IPO price of $29 per share on the first day of trading, and they more than quadrupled by year end. The stock has come down since then, now trading below 50% of its 52-week high, but it still boasts a price-to-sales valuation of 59, making it quite expensive.</p>\n<p>The insurtech, or insurance technology, company has amassed over a million customers in its short lifetime, reaching a milestone that took older insurance companies decades. Insurance buyers are drawn to Lemonade's customer-centric and speedy service -- it has paid out claims in as little as <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> second.</p>\n<p>Lemonade launched pet insurance last July, and life insurance rolled out this year. It's collecting troves of data to power its services, and this is how it can ask customers a series of questions and instantly offer a price quote for a policy and provide instant claims approvals (though only 30% approvals go this route -- the rest go to a live representative).</p>\n<p>This is also how the company has been able to scale its products and launch new ones. There is now at least one product offered in all 50 U.S. states, and the company recently announced the early stage launch of its auto insurance offering, Lemonade Car. Management believes they can catch policy buyers early, perhaps when seeking a low-priced renters policy, but then for the same customer acquisition cost, keep them on as they cycle through life events and require more expensive policies.</p>\n<p>Fourth-quarter 2020 results didn't impress investors, sending the stock plummeting, but you should think of this market reaction as the inevitable ups and downs of emerging companies. There's so much potential here for Lemonade to disrupt a $5 trillion global industry, and this is a great stock to load up on in the event of a crash.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0340c7880c0a59ddbd5b12f964ba697a\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>Image source: Airbnb.</p>\n<p><b>Creating a new travel industry</b></p>\n<p>Airbnb has upended the travel industry with its platform for vacation rentals that connects property owners and travelers. There are many benefits to its system -- stays often cost less than a hotel, host and property ratings let users know what to expect, and travelers can enjoy locations and unique experiences that may lack traditional acccommodations.</p>\n<p>That's why investors so highly anticipated Airbnb's IPO, and they sent the stock soaring in its first few months on the market. As with Lemonade, that enthusiasm has waned recently, but the stock is still trading at 31 times sales (or 22 times pre-pandemic 2019 revenue).</p>\n<p>The company still faces the challenge of reduced travel due to the pandemic, and market conditions will need time to recover. Fourth-quarter revenue decreased 22% year over year, and gross booking value declined 31%. That's an improvement over the beginning of 2020, but it's understandable the stock has lost steam, especially given its high valuation.</p>\n<p>But as travel comes back, sales and GBV should begin to gain momentum. Long term, management sees a serviceable addressable market of $1.5 trillion and a total addressable market of $3.4 trillion, making 2020 sales of $3.4 billion just a starting point for long-term growth.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/93e7854bb0d133ab437556088005f2f6\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>Image source: Getty Images.</p>\n<p><b>The rise of the gig economy</b></p>\n<p>The world has changed after the pandemic, and one prominent way is how we work. Fiverr, which connects freelancers and clients, is at the forefront of the work-from-home revolution, and it's poised to lead this space even after the pandemic.</p>\n<p>Fiverr went public in 2019. Its stock struggled that year, but it went on to gain over 700% in 2020 before losing steam this year as part of the broader tech sell-off. Trailing the <b>S&amp;P 500</b> year to date, shares still trade at 39 times sales.</p>\n<p>2020 revenue increased 77% year over year, but Fiverr's $190 million top line is a fraction of its $115 billion total addressable market. And the market is wide open as only a tiny portion of freelancing has migrated online. As the industry goes digital, and more people work from home, there's vast upside for Fiverr.</p>\n<p>So why Fiverr? It has a well-established platform with 500 freelance categories and a large suite of digital capabilities. It also has high net promoter scores from both freelancers and buyers, and happy users will continue to pay their fees to connect over the platform. That's already happening: In the fourth quarter, annual spend per buyer increased 20% year over year to $205.</p>\n<p>Fiverr, Lemonade, and Airbnb are all great companies disrupting large traditional industries, giving them a long runway for growth. If you have a greater appetite for risk, buy them now as recent declines present an opportunity of their own. Otherwise, if the market slides and prices drop further, even more conservative investors should consider adding these stocks to their portfolio.</p>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>3 Stocks to Buy When the Next Market Crash Comes</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n3 Stocks to Buy When the Next Market Crash Comes\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-05-04 20:04 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/05/04/3-stocks-to-buy-when-the-next-market-crash-comes/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The stock market has been soaring for a good year since it plummeted last March. Market crash predictions are common, and one of these days, it will happen. The broad market outperformance has been ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/05/04/3-stocks-to-buy-when-the-next-market-crash-comes/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/05/04/3-stocks-to-buy-when-the-next-market-crash-comes/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2132178325","content_text":"The stock market has been soaring for a good year since it plummeted last March. Market crash predictions are common, and one of these days, it will happen. The broad market outperformance has been out of sync with the global economic situation, and it does feel like the bubble could burst at any moment.\nIn such a situation, investors should buy shares of Lemonade (NYSE:LMND), Airbnb (NASDAQ:ABNB), and Fiverr (NYSE:FVRR). They carry rich premiums as of this writing, but in the fallout of a broad market downturn, they should be at the top of your watchlist.\n\nImage source: Getty Images.\nAppealing to a new generation of insurance buyers\nLemonade has been around since 2016, selling renters and homeowners insurance, and it dazzled investors during its market debut last July. Shares more than doubled from their IPO price of $29 per share on the first day of trading, and they more than quadrupled by year end. The stock has come down since then, now trading below 50% of its 52-week high, but it still boasts a price-to-sales valuation of 59, making it quite expensive.\nThe insurtech, or insurance technology, company has amassed over a million customers in its short lifetime, reaching a milestone that took older insurance companies decades. Insurance buyers are drawn to Lemonade's customer-centric and speedy service -- it has paid out claims in as little as one second.\nLemonade launched pet insurance last July, and life insurance rolled out this year. It's collecting troves of data to power its services, and this is how it can ask customers a series of questions and instantly offer a price quote for a policy and provide instant claims approvals (though only 30% approvals go this route -- the rest go to a live representative).\nThis is also how the company has been able to scale its products and launch new ones. There is now at least one product offered in all 50 U.S. states, and the company recently announced the early stage launch of its auto insurance offering, Lemonade Car. Management believes they can catch policy buyers early, perhaps when seeking a low-priced renters policy, but then for the same customer acquisition cost, keep them on as they cycle through life events and require more expensive policies.\nFourth-quarter 2020 results didn't impress investors, sending the stock plummeting, but you should think of this market reaction as the inevitable ups and downs of emerging companies. There's so much potential here for Lemonade to disrupt a $5 trillion global industry, and this is a great stock to load up on in the event of a crash.\n\nImage source: Airbnb.\nCreating a new travel industry\nAirbnb has upended the travel industry with its platform for vacation rentals that connects property owners and travelers. There are many benefits to its system -- stays often cost less than a hotel, host and property ratings let users know what to expect, and travelers can enjoy locations and unique experiences that may lack traditional acccommodations.\nThat's why investors so highly anticipated Airbnb's IPO, and they sent the stock soaring in its first few months on the market. As with Lemonade, that enthusiasm has waned recently, but the stock is still trading at 31 times sales (or 22 times pre-pandemic 2019 revenue).\nThe company still faces the challenge of reduced travel due to the pandemic, and market conditions will need time to recover. Fourth-quarter revenue decreased 22% year over year, and gross booking value declined 31%. That's an improvement over the beginning of 2020, but it's understandable the stock has lost steam, especially given its high valuation.\nBut as travel comes back, sales and GBV should begin to gain momentum. Long term, management sees a serviceable addressable market of $1.5 trillion and a total addressable market of $3.4 trillion, making 2020 sales of $3.4 billion just a starting point for long-term growth.\n\nImage source: Getty Images.\nThe rise of the gig economy\nThe world has changed after the pandemic, and one prominent way is how we work. Fiverr, which connects freelancers and clients, is at the forefront of the work-from-home revolution, and it's poised to lead this space even after the pandemic.\nFiverr went public in 2019. Its stock struggled that year, but it went on to gain over 700% in 2020 before losing steam this year as part of the broader tech sell-off. Trailing the S&P 500 year to date, shares still trade at 39 times sales.\n2020 revenue increased 77% year over year, but Fiverr's $190 million top line is a fraction of its $115 billion total addressable market. And the market is wide open as only a tiny portion of freelancing has migrated online. As the industry goes digital, and more people work from home, there's vast upside for Fiverr.\nSo why Fiverr? It has a well-established platform with 500 freelance categories and a large suite of digital capabilities. It also has high net promoter scores from both freelancers and buyers, and happy users will continue to pay their fees to connect over the platform. That's already happening: In the fourth quarter, annual spend per buyer increased 20% year over year to $205.\nFiverr, Lemonade, and Airbnb are all great companies disrupting large traditional industries, giving them a long runway for growth. If you have a greater appetite for risk, buy them now as recent declines present an opportunity of their own. Otherwise, if the market slides and prices drop further, even more conservative investors should consider adding these stocks to their portfolio.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":313,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":103586892,"gmtCreate":1619793444716,"gmtModify":1704272497358,"author":{"id":"3576837088119232","authorId":"3576837088119232","authorIdStr":"3576837088119232","name":"文氏","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13ab58f27225c31b03dde6b684f98f7e","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576837088119232"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Yes!","listText":"Yes!","text":"Yes!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/103586892","repostId":"1142070002","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1142070002","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1619792975,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1142070002?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-04-30 22:29","market":"us","language":"en","title":"NIO rose more than 5%, after falling nearly 4% before","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1142070002","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"NIO Earnings Looked a Lot Like Ford’s. What to Know.Chinese electric vehicle maker NIO posted better than expected first quarter results. But the global automotive microchip shortage will hit production in the coming months.NIO  is a highly valued, high-growth stock. Now NIO bulls have to decide whether solid earnings will trump the growth hiccup or whether the chip shortage can hurt the company in the long run.NIO lost 23 cents a share on an adjusted, non-GAAP basis, from $1.2 billion in sales.","content":"<p>NIO rose more than 5%, after falling nearly 4% before.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/80881ae9e6de48ac5e3733583db3ba9e\" tg-width=\"840\" tg-height=\"470\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><b>NIO Earnings Looked a Lot Like Ford’s. What to Know.</b></p><p>Chinese electric vehicle maker NIO posted better than expected first quarter results. But the global automotive microchip shortage will hit production in the coming months.</p><p>NIO (ticker: NIO) is a highly valued, high-growth stock. Now NIO bulls have to decide whether solid earnings will trump the growth hiccup or whether the chip shortage can hurt the company in the long run.</p><p>NIO lost&nbsp;23 cents&nbsp;a share on an adjusted, non-GAAP basis, from $1.2 billion in sales. Wall Street was looking for a comparable 84 cent loss from $1.1 billion in sales. NIO’s corporate gross profit margin came in at 19.5%, about 3 percentage points better than analysts projected and up from negative 12% a year ago. First quarter results look solid.</p><p>The stock isn’t moving though. NIO reported numbers at 5:30 p.m. eastern time and not a lot of stock is trading after hours. NIO shares closed down 5.3% in Thursday trading. TheS&amp;P 500&nbsp;and&nbsp;Dow Jones Industrial Average&nbsp;rose about&nbsp; 0.7%.</p><p>“NIO started the year of 2021 with a new quarterly delivery record of 20,060 vehicles in the first quarter,” said CEO William Bin Li in the company’s news release. “The overall demand for our products continues to be quite strong, but the supply chain is still facing significant challenges due to the semiconductor shortage.”</p><p>Management called the chip situation “very severe” on its conference call and projected 21,000 to 22,000 vehicle deliveries for the second quarter and sales of about $1.3 billion. The Street is projecting $1.2 billion in sales. But the unit delivery guidance is a little lower than Deutsche Bank analyst Edison Yu had expected.</p><p>For the full year, Yu is modeling 95,000 deliveries. With about 42,000 deliveries likely for the first half of 2021, the resolution of the global chip shortage will go a long way to deciding whether or not NIO can reach Yu’s number.</p><p>Yu rates NIO shares Buy and has a $60 price target for the stock.</p><p>The overall quarter feels a little like&nbsp;Ford Motor‘s (F) quarter, which was&nbsp;reported Wednesday. Ford reported sales and earnings far better than Wall Street projected. Unit volumes were below the company’s internal projections, but improving vehicle mix boosted sales beyond Street projections. Ford prioritized making higher-end vehicles in the face of limited chip supply. Looking ahead, Ford said the impact of the chip shortage would be at the high end of the company’s initial $1 billion to $2.5 billion cost guidance.</p><p>Ford stock close down 9.4% Thursday, the day after the Wednesday evening report. The NIO second-quarter guidance isn’t as surprising as Ford’s. And NIO doesn’t have full-year guidance. But calling NIO’s stock price reaction is difficult.</p><p>Ford trades for less than 7 times estimated 2022 earnings. NIO is expected to become profitable on a full-year basis in 2022. What’s more, NIO is worth about 50% more than Ford.</p><p>NIO’s conference call wrapped up about 10 p.m. eastern time. After the chip shortage, analysts focused questions on EV competition in China and NIO’s production expansion. NIO is putting in place&nbsp;capacity to produce&nbsp;hundreds of thousands of vehicles in coming years.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>NIO rose more than 5%, after falling nearly 4% before</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nNIO rose more than 5%, after falling nearly 4% before\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-04-30 22:29</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>NIO rose more than 5%, after falling nearly 4% before.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/80881ae9e6de48ac5e3733583db3ba9e\" tg-width=\"840\" tg-height=\"470\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><b>NIO Earnings Looked a Lot Like Ford’s. What to Know.</b></p><p>Chinese electric vehicle maker NIO posted better than expected first quarter results. But the global automotive microchip shortage will hit production in the coming months.</p><p>NIO (ticker: NIO) is a highly valued, high-growth stock. Now NIO bulls have to decide whether solid earnings will trump the growth hiccup or whether the chip shortage can hurt the company in the long run.</p><p>NIO lost&nbsp;23 cents&nbsp;a share on an adjusted, non-GAAP basis, from $1.2 billion in sales. Wall Street was looking for a comparable 84 cent loss from $1.1 billion in sales. NIO’s corporate gross profit margin came in at 19.5%, about 3 percentage points better than analysts projected and up from negative 12% a year ago. First quarter results look solid.</p><p>The stock isn’t moving though. NIO reported numbers at 5:30 p.m. eastern time and not a lot of stock is trading after hours. NIO shares closed down 5.3% in Thursday trading. TheS&amp;P 500&nbsp;and&nbsp;Dow Jones Industrial Average&nbsp;rose about&nbsp; 0.7%.</p><p>“NIO started the year of 2021 with a new quarterly delivery record of 20,060 vehicles in the first quarter,” said CEO William Bin Li in the company’s news release. “The overall demand for our products continues to be quite strong, but the supply chain is still facing significant challenges due to the semiconductor shortage.”</p><p>Management called the chip situation “very severe” on its conference call and projected 21,000 to 22,000 vehicle deliveries for the second quarter and sales of about $1.3 billion. The Street is projecting $1.2 billion in sales. But the unit delivery guidance is a little lower than Deutsche Bank analyst Edison Yu had expected.</p><p>For the full year, Yu is modeling 95,000 deliveries. With about 42,000 deliveries likely for the first half of 2021, the resolution of the global chip shortage will go a long way to deciding whether or not NIO can reach Yu’s number.</p><p>Yu rates NIO shares Buy and has a $60 price target for the stock.</p><p>The overall quarter feels a little like&nbsp;Ford Motor‘s (F) quarter, which was&nbsp;reported Wednesday. Ford reported sales and earnings far better than Wall Street projected. Unit volumes were below the company’s internal projections, but improving vehicle mix boosted sales beyond Street projections. Ford prioritized making higher-end vehicles in the face of limited chip supply. Looking ahead, Ford said the impact of the chip shortage would be at the high end of the company’s initial $1 billion to $2.5 billion cost guidance.</p><p>Ford stock close down 9.4% Thursday, the day after the Wednesday evening report. The NIO second-quarter guidance isn’t as surprising as Ford’s. And NIO doesn’t have full-year guidance. But calling NIO’s stock price reaction is difficult.</p><p>Ford trades for less than 7 times estimated 2022 earnings. NIO is expected to become profitable on a full-year basis in 2022. What’s more, NIO is worth about 50% more than Ford.</p><p>NIO’s conference call wrapped up about 10 p.m. eastern time. After the chip shortage, analysts focused questions on EV competition in China and NIO’s production expansion. NIO is putting in place&nbsp;capacity to produce&nbsp;hundreds of thousands of vehicles in coming years.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NIO":"蔚来"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1142070002","content_text":"NIO rose more than 5%, after falling nearly 4% before.NIO Earnings Looked a Lot Like Ford’s. What to Know.Chinese electric vehicle maker NIO posted better than expected first quarter results. But the global automotive microchip shortage will hit production in the coming months.NIO (ticker: NIO) is a highly valued, high-growth stock. Now NIO bulls have to decide whether solid earnings will trump the growth hiccup or whether the chip shortage can hurt the company in the long run.NIO lost 23 cents a share on an adjusted, non-GAAP basis, from $1.2 billion in sales. Wall Street was looking for a comparable 84 cent loss from $1.1 billion in sales. NIO’s corporate gross profit margin came in at 19.5%, about 3 percentage points better than analysts projected and up from negative 12% a year ago. First quarter results look solid.The stock isn’t moving though. NIO reported numbers at 5:30 p.m. eastern time and not a lot of stock is trading after hours. NIO shares closed down 5.3% in Thursday trading. TheS&P 500 and Dow Jones Industrial Average rose about  0.7%.“NIO started the year of 2021 with a new quarterly delivery record of 20,060 vehicles in the first quarter,” said CEO William Bin Li in the company’s news release. “The overall demand for our products continues to be quite strong, but the supply chain is still facing significant challenges due to the semiconductor shortage.”Management called the chip situation “very severe” on its conference call and projected 21,000 to 22,000 vehicle deliveries for the second quarter and sales of about $1.3 billion. The Street is projecting $1.2 billion in sales. But the unit delivery guidance is a little lower than Deutsche Bank analyst Edison Yu had expected.For the full year, Yu is modeling 95,000 deliveries. With about 42,000 deliveries likely for the first half of 2021, the resolution of the global chip shortage will go a long way to deciding whether or not NIO can reach Yu’s number.Yu rates NIO shares Buy and has a $60 price target for the stock.The overall quarter feels a little like Ford Motor‘s (F) quarter, which was reported Wednesday. Ford reported sales and earnings far better than Wall Street projected. Unit volumes were below the company’s internal projections, but improving vehicle mix boosted sales beyond Street projections. Ford prioritized making higher-end vehicles in the face of limited chip supply. Looking ahead, Ford said the impact of the chip shortage would be at the high end of the company’s initial $1 billion to $2.5 billion cost guidance.Ford stock close down 9.4% Thursday, the day after the Wednesday evening report. The NIO second-quarter guidance isn’t as surprising as Ford’s. And NIO doesn’t have full-year guidance. But calling NIO’s stock price reaction is difficult.Ford trades for less than 7 times estimated 2022 earnings. NIO is expected to become profitable on a full-year basis in 2022. What’s more, NIO is worth about 50% more than Ford.NIO’s conference call wrapped up about 10 p.m. eastern time. After the chip shortage, analysts focused questions on EV competition in China and NIO’s production expansion. NIO is putting in place capacity to produce hundreds of thousands of vehicles in coming years.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":344,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":377267069,"gmtCreate":1619531257151,"gmtModify":1704725514449,"author":{"id":"3576837088119232","authorId":"3576837088119232","authorIdStr":"3576837088119232","name":"文氏","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13ab58f27225c31b03dde6b684f98f7e","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576837088119232"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Upupup","listText":"Upupup","text":"Upupup","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/377267069","repostId":"1161810404","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1161810404","pubTimestamp":1619527994,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1161810404?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-04-27 20:53","market":"us","language":"en","title":"What's The Real Story Of Tesla In China?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1161810404","media":"ZeroHedge","summary":"What’s really going on for Tesla in China? Global supply chains remain fragile as the Chinese flex t","content":"<p><b><i>What’s really going on for Tesla in China? Global supply chains remain fragile as the Chinese flex their muscles and national buying power. That may prove problematic for western firms, and especially Tesla. But also it raises questions about investment imperatives on China growth vs flatline in the West.</i></b></p>\n<p>There is lots to be positive about this morning. The first headline to catch my eye was a prediction from Goldman Sachs raising their target to 7.8% UK growth in 2021 – up from the 5% consensus. Great stuff! A colleague sent me the FT’s analysis of the&nbsp;Pandemic end-game: 5.2% people have been infected last week, but vaccines are clearly working and saving lives. And there are some spectacular company results hitting the screens.</p>\n<p>But across the globe supply chain ructions continue. Jaguar Land Rover has shut down a number of factories over the global shortage of chips. There are warning of everything from autos, fridges, toasters to airplanes being delayed due to apparent hoarding by Chinese manufacturers concerned about possible sanctions if the current cold war heats up.</p>\n<ul>\n <li><p>We have a global explosion of repressed consumer spending set to hit the market.</p></li>\n <li><p>There is a global shortage of goods. (I know this – it looks like our new kitchen will have a wine-chiller shaped gap due to the lack of supply! Shocking…. Simply shocking…)</p></li>\n <li><p>There is the threat of further supply shocks on the back of rising trade and cold-war ructions.</p></li>\n</ul>\n<p><b>The world is less stable than we hope. And it boils down to a very simple question. What’s really happening in China?</b>That, I suspect, is the critical factor when it comes to predicting just how strong pandemic recovery will be, or how constrained it may become.</p>\n<p>I saw a headline flash by this morning anticipating Apple iPhone China sales fell in March as sales of new domestic smart-phones kicked in. According to&nbsp;Seeking Alpha&nbsp;high China sales in Jan/Feb have reversed despite the success of the new iPhone 12. (Apple numbers are tomorrow.) Why would China sales fall? Is it because Chinese consumers are increasingly persuaded to buy home-grown product, fuelled by a patriotic duty to do so?</p>\n<p><b>Tesla is finding itself on the receiving end of pointed official China criticism</b>– and Musk (surprisingly) has bowed his head and promised to do better. The headlines about a US Tesla crash where there is a dispute about whether anyone was actually driving is just noise and distraction. The real story is the future for Tesla demand in China.</p>\n<p>If Tesla was criticised in the US for shoddy servicing, poor customer care, and was accused of breaching privacy rules with car mounted cameras, you can bet Musk would be screaming obscenities, appearing on prime time TV smoking a joint to tell us regulators are idiots, and that the press knows nothing. Allegations of customer dissatisfaction would be steamrollered by a barrage of Tesla Fanboy hate posts and denials refusing to discuss the matter.</p>\n<p>But, when Tesla gets accused of the same failings in China – suddenly Musk does the right thing and kow-tows, promising to do better. Musk is beginning to understand that displaying “sincerity” in China means doing exactly what the state tells him to do.</p>\n<p><b>Tesla is walking a very thin line in China</b>– and Elon knows it. On one hand, he’s bet the shop on promises the EV maker will deliver big into China. On the other, the recent Shanghai Motor Show featured a couple of Teslas, but, more importantly, a vast number of sophisticated Chinese new models EVs set for launch in the coming year.</p>\n<p>Musk may soon realise the Chinese might just have played him for a chump – supporting and financing his gigafactory build to get EVs established in the Chinese consumer mindset, while also conclusively demonstrating to the Chinese autofirms the foreign rival products they have to beat.</p>\n<p>And since we’re talking about Tesla, let’s get off the China theme for a moment, and think about the results it announced y’day: Congratulations to them for beating Q1 expectations. Net income of $438mm, revenues up 74% and 185,000 cars delivered.</p>\n<p><i><b>But… all that glitters is not revenue from car sales… Let’s see… what did the results really tell us? That profit was based on $518 mm of regulatory credit sales and a $101 positive gain from its Bitcoin position and sales. Strip these out and… and Telsa lost $181mm selling cars.</b></i></p>\n<p>To this day I don’t believe Tesla has made a single brass cent selling cars, yet the purveyor of fine regulatory credits and dabbler in cryptocurrencies has made its owner the second richest man on the planet. (And yes.. I still hold a small position in the stock.)</p>\n<p>More importantly, the Q1 results show Musk is caught between the proverbial rock and river. He knows winning in China is critical for his evolved EV scheme.</p>\n<p><b>Ok – calling Tesla a pyramid scheme is harsh, but Musk knows he needs to keep up the positive news flow; continually demonstrating Telsa’s lead in EV, increasing his production numbers, upping the profits and feeding a never-ending stream of positive spin (like autonomous driving tomorrow – always tomorrow). Without the positive spin driving Tesla marketing and keeping up the stock-price, how will he continue to attract new buyers while persuading current investors to HODL! (Crypto-verse speak for “hold on for dear life”).</b></p>\n<p>There is a big missed theme around Tesla – competition.</p>\n<p><b>Their EV tech moat is shallow.</b>Today, the firm is still ahead in EV terms of consumer deliverables like quality, range, handling etc, but the rest of the Automotive world; from Tokyo to Munich, from Shanghai to Detroit is playing catch up fast.</p>\n<p><b>Going back to China, the party is very keen to see domestic producers not only dominated the China market, but to establish themselves abroad.</b>That’s as true in EVs as it will be in Smart-phones, fridges and all the other paraphernalia of modern life…</p>\n<p>Let, me stir this a bit more. Should you bite the moral bullet and buy HSBC? The potential downside is its engaging with China – but its China that makes the bank so valuable. HSBC is a good illustration of the China conundrum.</p>\n<p>The geopolitical tensions look high. There are few signs the US and China will reach anything better than a new cold war which is bound to further roil supply chains. There are a surprising number of articles around on how the newly empowered Chinese navy is set to take on American carrier task forces over Taiwan – and hammer them with land-based hyper-missiles. (None of this bodes well for the&nbsp;Big-Lizzie UK carrier strike group&nbsp;heading to the region this summer.)</p>\n<p>The moral arguments against any China investment can’t be ignored. The treatment of the Uyghurs, surveillance, Tibet and the rest are difficult to square with any ESG investment mandate.</p>\n<p>China critics will point to the case of Jack Ma and issues of the rule law as further reasons to remain shy of China investors. But its only by fully embracing capitalism and the market economy model – with Chinese Characteristics – the Chinese have been able to so successfully grow their economy and take it through its earlier export-led model to today’s consumption-led economy. The Chinese want their luxury and consumer goods, just like the rest of us.</p>\n<p>The next couple of months are going to be fascinated in terms of how the China story develops. Trade Wars, its own internal markets, Patriotic buying programmes, and Geopolitics will all feature. At this point, remember my mantra no 4:&nbsp;<b>“Things are seldom as bad as you fear, but never as good as you hope!”</b></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>What's The Real Story Of Tesla In China?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhat's The Real Story Of Tesla In China?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-04-27 20:53 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/whats-real-story-tesla-china><strong>ZeroHedge</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>What’s really going on for Tesla in China? Global supply chains remain fragile as the Chinese flex their muscles and national buying power. That may prove problematic for western firms, and especially...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/whats-real-story-tesla-china\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/whats-real-story-tesla-china","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1161810404","content_text":"What’s really going on for Tesla in China? Global supply chains remain fragile as the Chinese flex their muscles and national buying power. That may prove problematic for western firms, and especially Tesla. But also it raises questions about investment imperatives on China growth vs flatline in the West.\nThere is lots to be positive about this morning. The first headline to catch my eye was a prediction from Goldman Sachs raising their target to 7.8% UK growth in 2021 – up from the 5% consensus. Great stuff! A colleague sent me the FT’s analysis of the Pandemic end-game: 5.2% people have been infected last week, but vaccines are clearly working and saving lives. And there are some spectacular company results hitting the screens.\nBut across the globe supply chain ructions continue. Jaguar Land Rover has shut down a number of factories over the global shortage of chips. There are warning of everything from autos, fridges, toasters to airplanes being delayed due to apparent hoarding by Chinese manufacturers concerned about possible sanctions if the current cold war heats up.\n\nWe have a global explosion of repressed consumer spending set to hit the market.\nThere is a global shortage of goods. (I know this – it looks like our new kitchen will have a wine-chiller shaped gap due to the lack of supply! Shocking…. Simply shocking…)\nThere is the threat of further supply shocks on the back of rising trade and cold-war ructions.\n\nThe world is less stable than we hope. And it boils down to a very simple question. What’s really happening in China?That, I suspect, is the critical factor when it comes to predicting just how strong pandemic recovery will be, or how constrained it may become.\nI saw a headline flash by this morning anticipating Apple iPhone China sales fell in March as sales of new domestic smart-phones kicked in. According to Seeking Alpha high China sales in Jan/Feb have reversed despite the success of the new iPhone 12. (Apple numbers are tomorrow.) Why would China sales fall? Is it because Chinese consumers are increasingly persuaded to buy home-grown product, fuelled by a patriotic duty to do so?\nTesla is finding itself on the receiving end of pointed official China criticism– and Musk (surprisingly) has bowed his head and promised to do better. The headlines about a US Tesla crash where there is a dispute about whether anyone was actually driving is just noise and distraction. The real story is the future for Tesla demand in China.\nIf Tesla was criticised in the US for shoddy servicing, poor customer care, and was accused of breaching privacy rules with car mounted cameras, you can bet Musk would be screaming obscenities, appearing on prime time TV smoking a joint to tell us regulators are idiots, and that the press knows nothing. Allegations of customer dissatisfaction would be steamrollered by a barrage of Tesla Fanboy hate posts and denials refusing to discuss the matter.\nBut, when Tesla gets accused of the same failings in China – suddenly Musk does the right thing and kow-tows, promising to do better. Musk is beginning to understand that displaying “sincerity” in China means doing exactly what the state tells him to do.\nTesla is walking a very thin line in China– and Elon knows it. On one hand, he’s bet the shop on promises the EV maker will deliver big into China. On the other, the recent Shanghai Motor Show featured a couple of Teslas, but, more importantly, a vast number of sophisticated Chinese new models EVs set for launch in the coming year.\nMusk may soon realise the Chinese might just have played him for a chump – supporting and financing his gigafactory build to get EVs established in the Chinese consumer mindset, while also conclusively demonstrating to the Chinese autofirms the foreign rival products they have to beat.\nAnd since we’re talking about Tesla, let’s get off the China theme for a moment, and think about the results it announced y’day: Congratulations to them for beating Q1 expectations. Net income of $438mm, revenues up 74% and 185,000 cars delivered.\nBut… all that glitters is not revenue from car sales… Let’s see… what did the results really tell us? That profit was based on $518 mm of regulatory credit sales and a $101 positive gain from its Bitcoin position and sales. Strip these out and… and Telsa lost $181mm selling cars.\nTo this day I don’t believe Tesla has made a single brass cent selling cars, yet the purveyor of fine regulatory credits and dabbler in cryptocurrencies has made its owner the second richest man on the planet. (And yes.. I still hold a small position in the stock.)\nMore importantly, the Q1 results show Musk is caught between the proverbial rock and river. He knows winning in China is critical for his evolved EV scheme.\nOk – calling Tesla a pyramid scheme is harsh, but Musk knows he needs to keep up the positive news flow; continually demonstrating Telsa’s lead in EV, increasing his production numbers, upping the profits and feeding a never-ending stream of positive spin (like autonomous driving tomorrow – always tomorrow). Without the positive spin driving Tesla marketing and keeping up the stock-price, how will he continue to attract new buyers while persuading current investors to HODL! (Crypto-verse speak for “hold on for dear life”).\nThere is a big missed theme around Tesla – competition.\nTheir EV tech moat is shallow.Today, the firm is still ahead in EV terms of consumer deliverables like quality, range, handling etc, but the rest of the Automotive world; from Tokyo to Munich, from Shanghai to Detroit is playing catch up fast.\nGoing back to China, the party is very keen to see domestic producers not only dominated the China market, but to establish themselves abroad.That’s as true in EVs as it will be in Smart-phones, fridges and all the other paraphernalia of modern life…\nLet, me stir this a bit more. Should you bite the moral bullet and buy HSBC? The potential downside is its engaging with China – but its China that makes the bank so valuable. HSBC is a good illustration of the China conundrum.\nThe geopolitical tensions look high. There are few signs the US and China will reach anything better than a new cold war which is bound to further roil supply chains. There are a surprising number of articles around on how the newly empowered Chinese navy is set to take on American carrier task forces over Taiwan – and hammer them with land-based hyper-missiles. (None of this bodes well for the Big-Lizzie UK carrier strike group heading to the region this summer.)\nThe moral arguments against any China investment can’t be ignored. The treatment of the Uyghurs, surveillance, Tibet and the rest are difficult to square with any ESG investment mandate.\nChina critics will point to the case of Jack Ma and issues of the rule law as further reasons to remain shy of China investors. But its only by fully embracing capitalism and the market economy model – with Chinese Characteristics – the Chinese have been able to so successfully grow their economy and take it through its earlier export-led model to today’s consumption-led economy. The Chinese want their luxury and consumer goods, just like the rest of us.\nThe next couple of months are going to be fascinated in terms of how the China story develops. Trade Wars, its own internal markets, Patriotic buying programmes, and Geopolitics will all feature. At this point, remember my mantra no 4: “Things are seldom as bad as you fear, but never as good as you hope!”","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":138,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":374256201,"gmtCreate":1619450497703,"gmtModify":1704724147464,"author":{"id":"3576837088119232","authorId":"3576837088119232","authorIdStr":"3576837088119232","name":"文氏","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13ab58f27225c31b03dde6b684f98f7e","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576837088119232"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"When should I buy? Issit too late now????","listText":"When should I buy? Issit too late now????","text":"When should I buy? Issit too late now????","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/374256201","repostId":"2130364766","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2130364766","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Stock Market Quotes, Business News, Financial News, Trading Ideas, and Stock Research by Professionals","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Benzinga","id":"1052270027","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa"},"pubTimestamp":1619318325,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2130364766?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-04-25 10:38","market":"us","language":"en","title":"What to Expect From Tesla's Q1 Earnings Report On Monday","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2130364766","media":"Benzinga","summary":"EV giant Tesla, Inc.  is scheduled to release its first-quarter results Monday, after the market close.Key Q1 Metrics to Watch For:  Tesla is expected to report non-GAAP earnings per share, or EPS, of 79 cents in the first quarter of 2021, up sharply from 23 cents in the year-ago quarter.The consensus revenue forecast for the quarter is at $10.29 billion, up 72% year-over-year.Focus On Regulatory Credits, Automotive Margins:  The focus is likely to be on regulatory credits, which accounted for 4","content":"<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fe458ac1cf82668bd4bf27fbaa6506e5\" tg-width=\"600\" tg-height=\"400\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>EV giant <b>Tesla, Inc. </b>(NASDAQ: TSLA) is scheduled to release its first-quarter results Monday, after the market close.</p><p><b>Key Q1 Metrics to Watch For: </b> Tesla is expected to report non-GAAP earnings per share, or EPS, of 79 cents in the first quarter of 2021, up sharply from 23 cents in the year-ago quarter.</p><p>The consensus revenue forecast for the quarter is at $10.29 billion, up 72% year-over-year.</p><p>In the fourth quarter, Tesla had earned 80 cents per share on a non-GAAP basis on revenues of $10.74 billion.</p><p>Tesla revealed in early April it delivered a record 184,800 vehicles in the first quarter, comprising 182,780 Model 3/Y vehicles and 2,020 Model S/X vehicles. This represents a 109% year-over-year increase and 2.2% sequential growth. Quarterly production was at 180,338.</p><p><b>Focus On Regulatory Credits, Automotive Margins: </b> The focus is likely to be on regulatory credits, which accounted for 4.3% of its revenues in the fourth quarter of 2020. Zero-emission vehicle regulations adopted by several states allow EV manufacturers to&nbsp;earn regulatory credits, which can be monetized by selling to legacy automakers, who are not able to achieve the minimum target set for the proportion of green energy vehicles sold.</p><p>Automotive gross margin slipped to 24.1% in the fourth quarter of 2020 from 27.7% in the previous quarter. It's likely the company could see a further moderation in margins, as production of the higher priced Model S/X vehicles was stalled in the quarter to allow for model refreshes.</p><p><b>View more earnings on TSLA</b></p><p>With competitive pressure intensifying, Tesla could aggressively slash vehicles prices in order to achieve volume production targets, long-time Tesla bear Gordon Johnson said in a note previewing the quarterly results.</p><p>Tesla investors may also be keen to find out more about the company's Bitcoin investment strategy and its decision to allow the use of Bitcoin for vehicle purchases.</p><p><b>Forward Outlook:</b> Tesla is well positioned to capitalize on the opportunity presented by the exponential growth that is anticipated for green energy vehicles.<b> </b>Its&nbsp;Giga Shanghai factory is now churning out both Model S and Model Y vehicles, and more capacity is expected to come on line with the opening of factories in Berlin and Texas.</p><p>Tesla's CFO Zach Kirkhorn said on the earnings call that the company is shooting for a 50% compounded annual growth rate in volume sales&nbsp;and expects to materially exceed the target in 2021.</p><p><b>Stock Take: </b> Tesla's shares, which were flying high until early February, joined the tech sell-off that ensued. From a split-adjusted high of $900.40 on Jan. 25, the stock fell to $539.49 on March 5, a peak-to-trough decline of 40%.</p><p>Although the stock has made good some of the losses since then, it is yet to break above $800 level.</p><p>Tesla holds a several-year lead and is now expanding aggressively into storage, and therefore a premium valuation for its shares is justified, CANACCORD Genuity analyst Jed Dorsheimer said in a recent note. The firm has a $1,071 price target for the stock.</p><p>Friday, Tesla's shares ended 1.35% higher at $729.40.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>What to Expect From Tesla's Q1 Earnings Report On Monday</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhat to Expect From Tesla's Q1 Earnings Report On Monday\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Benzinga </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-04-25 10:38</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fe458ac1cf82668bd4bf27fbaa6506e5\" tg-width=\"600\" tg-height=\"400\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>EV giant <b>Tesla, Inc. </b>(NASDAQ: TSLA) is scheduled to release its first-quarter results Monday, after the market close.</p><p><b>Key Q1 Metrics to Watch For: </b> Tesla is expected to report non-GAAP earnings per share, or EPS, of 79 cents in the first quarter of 2021, up sharply from 23 cents in the year-ago quarter.</p><p>The consensus revenue forecast for the quarter is at $10.29 billion, up 72% year-over-year.</p><p>In the fourth quarter, Tesla had earned 80 cents per share on a non-GAAP basis on revenues of $10.74 billion.</p><p>Tesla revealed in early April it delivered a record 184,800 vehicles in the first quarter, comprising 182,780 Model 3/Y vehicles and 2,020 Model S/X vehicles. This represents a 109% year-over-year increase and 2.2% sequential growth. Quarterly production was at 180,338.</p><p><b>Focus On Regulatory Credits, Automotive Margins: </b> The focus is likely to be on regulatory credits, which accounted for 4.3% of its revenues in the fourth quarter of 2020. Zero-emission vehicle regulations adopted by several states allow EV manufacturers to&nbsp;earn regulatory credits, which can be monetized by selling to legacy automakers, who are not able to achieve the minimum target set for the proportion of green energy vehicles sold.</p><p>Automotive gross margin slipped to 24.1% in the fourth quarter of 2020 from 27.7% in the previous quarter. It's likely the company could see a further moderation in margins, as production of the higher priced Model S/X vehicles was stalled in the quarter to allow for model refreshes.</p><p><b>View more earnings on TSLA</b></p><p>With competitive pressure intensifying, Tesla could aggressively slash vehicles prices in order to achieve volume production targets, long-time Tesla bear Gordon Johnson said in a note previewing the quarterly results.</p><p>Tesla investors may also be keen to find out more about the company's Bitcoin investment strategy and its decision to allow the use of Bitcoin for vehicle purchases.</p><p><b>Forward Outlook:</b> Tesla is well positioned to capitalize on the opportunity presented by the exponential growth that is anticipated for green energy vehicles.<b> </b>Its&nbsp;Giga Shanghai factory is now churning out both Model S and Model Y vehicles, and more capacity is expected to come on line with the opening of factories in Berlin and Texas.</p><p>Tesla's CFO Zach Kirkhorn said on the earnings call that the company is shooting for a 50% compounded annual growth rate in volume sales&nbsp;and expects to materially exceed the target in 2021.</p><p><b>Stock Take: </b> Tesla's shares, which were flying high until early February, joined the tech sell-off that ensued. From a split-adjusted high of $900.40 on Jan. 25, the stock fell to $539.49 on March 5, a peak-to-trough decline of 40%.</p><p>Although the stock has made good some of the losses since then, it is yet to break above $800 level.</p><p>Tesla holds a several-year lead and is now expanding aggressively into storage, and therefore a premium valuation for its shares is justified, CANACCORD Genuity analyst Jed Dorsheimer said in a recent note. The firm has a $1,071 price target for the stock.</p><p>Friday, Tesla's shares ended 1.35% higher at $729.40.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2130364766","content_text":"EV giant Tesla, Inc. (NASDAQ: TSLA) is scheduled to release its first-quarter results Monday, after the market close.Key Q1 Metrics to Watch For:  Tesla is expected to report non-GAAP earnings per share, or EPS, of 79 cents in the first quarter of 2021, up sharply from 23 cents in the year-ago quarter.The consensus revenue forecast for the quarter is at $10.29 billion, up 72% year-over-year.In the fourth quarter, Tesla had earned 80 cents per share on a non-GAAP basis on revenues of $10.74 billion.Tesla revealed in early April it delivered a record 184,800 vehicles in the first quarter, comprising 182,780 Model 3/Y vehicles and 2,020 Model S/X vehicles. This represents a 109% year-over-year increase and 2.2% sequential growth. Quarterly production was at 180,338.Focus On Regulatory Credits, Automotive Margins:  The focus is likely to be on regulatory credits, which accounted for 4.3% of its revenues in the fourth quarter of 2020. Zero-emission vehicle regulations adopted by several states allow EV manufacturers to earn regulatory credits, which can be monetized by selling to legacy automakers, who are not able to achieve the minimum target set for the proportion of green energy vehicles sold.Automotive gross margin slipped to 24.1% in the fourth quarter of 2020 from 27.7% in the previous quarter. It's likely the company could see a further moderation in margins, as production of the higher priced Model S/X vehicles was stalled in the quarter to allow for model refreshes.View more earnings on TSLAWith competitive pressure intensifying, Tesla could aggressively slash vehicles prices in order to achieve volume production targets, long-time Tesla bear Gordon Johnson said in a note previewing the quarterly results.Tesla investors may also be keen to find out more about the company's Bitcoin investment strategy and its decision to allow the use of Bitcoin for vehicle purchases.Forward Outlook: Tesla is well positioned to capitalize on the opportunity presented by the exponential growth that is anticipated for green energy vehicles. Its Giga Shanghai factory is now churning out both Model S and Model Y vehicles, and more capacity is expected to come on line with the opening of factories in Berlin and Texas.Tesla's CFO Zach Kirkhorn said on the earnings call that the company is shooting for a 50% compounded annual growth rate in volume sales and expects to materially exceed the target in 2021.Stock Take:  Tesla's shares, which were flying high until early February, joined the tech sell-off that ensued. From a split-adjusted high of $900.40 on Jan. 25, the stock fell to $539.49 on March 5, a peak-to-trough decline of 40%.Although the stock has made good some of the losses since then, it is yet to break above $800 level.Tesla holds a several-year lead and is now expanding aggressively into storage, and therefore a premium valuation for its shares is justified, CANACCORD Genuity analyst Jed Dorsheimer said in a recent note. The firm has a $1,071 price target for the stock.Friday, Tesla's shares ended 1.35% higher at $729.40.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":172,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":378383719,"gmtCreate":1619001087431,"gmtModify":1704718100269,"author":{"id":"3576837088119232","authorId":"3576837088119232","authorIdStr":"3576837088119232","name":"文氏","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13ab58f27225c31b03dde6b684f98f7e","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576837088119232"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Didn't manage to sell in time =(","listText":"Didn't manage to sell in time =(","text":"Didn't manage to sell in time =(","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/378383719","repostId":"1131238315","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1131238315","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1618992068,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1131238315?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-04-21 16:01","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Netflix shares tumbled more than 8% in premarket trading","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1131238315","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Netflix Inc said slower production of TV shows and movies during the pandemic hurt subscriber growth","content":"<p>Netflix Inc&nbsp;said slower production of TV shows and movies during the pandemic hurt subscriber growth in the first quarter, sending shares of the world's largest streaming service down 8% in Wednesday&nbsp;premarket trading.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5a93bcc114bbf3391d2ddf1fcbecc2b9\" tg-width=\"1302\" tg-height=\"833\"></p>\n<p>Roughly 3.98 million people signed up for Netflix from January through March, below the 6.25 million average projection of analysts surveyed by Refinitiv.</p>\n<p>Netflix estimated it will add just 1 million new streaming customers in the second quarter. Analysts had expected a forecast of nearly 4.8 million.</p>\n<p>Shares of Netflix sunk 11% in after-hours trading to $489.28, wiping $25 billion off the company's market capitalization. Its stock has risen 27% over the past 12 months compared with a 63% increase in the tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite Index(.IXIC).</p>\n<p>Netflix said it did not believe competition changed materially in the quarter or impacted its new sign-ups \"as the over-forecast was across all of our regions.\"</p>\n<p>The company projected membership growth would accelerate in the second half of the year when it releases new seasons of \"You,\" \"Money Heist,\" and \"The Witcher\" and action movie \"Red Notice,\" among other titles.</p>\n<p>A year ago, Netflix added a record 15.8 million customers as the pandemic forced people around the world to stay home. The company said on Tuesday the pandemic hindered filming new shows.</p>\n<p>\"These dynamics are also contributing to a lighter content slate in the first half of 2021, and hence, we believe slower membership growth,\" the company said in its quarterly letter to shareholders.</p>\n<p>Analysts project people will spend less time streaming from their living rooms as COVID-19 vaccinations spread and more people emerge from their homes.</p>\n<p>Rival media companies have declared streaming their priority and are spending billions to compete with Netflix. Walt Disney Co's(DIS.N)Disney+ crossed 100 million subscribers in March. Netflix's total streaming customers stood at 207.6 million at the end of March.</p>\n<p>Netflix's share of new U.S. subscribers fell to 8.5% during the quarter, down from 16.2% the same period a year ago, according to Kantar Media.</p>\n<p>During the quarter, Netflix lost one of its most popular titles when workplace comedy \"The Office\" moved to Comcast Corp(CMCSA.O)streaming service Peacock.</p>\n<p>Netflix also raised its monthly rates in Britain, Germany, Argentina and Japan during the quarter.</p>\n<p>New customers totaled 1.8 million in Europe, 1.36 million in Asia and 360,000 in Latin America.</p>\n<p>\"What wasn't expected was the strength of the slowdown in international markets, where competition is significantly lower,\" said eMarketer analyst Eric Haggstrom.</p>\n<p>Excluding items, the company earned $3.75 per share in the first quarter, beating analyst estimates of $2.97 per share.</p>\n<p>Revenue rose to $7.16 billion from $5.77 billion during the quarter, edging past estimates of $7.13 billion.</p>\n<p>Net income rose to $1.71 billion, or $3.75 per share, from $709 million, or $1.57 per share, a year earlier.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Netflix shares tumbled more than 8% in premarket trading</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nNetflix shares tumbled more than 8% in premarket trading\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-04-21 16:01</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Netflix Inc&nbsp;said slower production of TV shows and movies during the pandemic hurt subscriber growth in the first quarter, sending shares of the world's largest streaming service down 8% in Wednesday&nbsp;premarket trading.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5a93bcc114bbf3391d2ddf1fcbecc2b9\" tg-width=\"1302\" tg-height=\"833\"></p>\n<p>Roughly 3.98 million people signed up for Netflix from January through March, below the 6.25 million average projection of analysts surveyed by Refinitiv.</p>\n<p>Netflix estimated it will add just 1 million new streaming customers in the second quarter. Analysts had expected a forecast of nearly 4.8 million.</p>\n<p>Shares of Netflix sunk 11% in after-hours trading to $489.28, wiping $25 billion off the company's market capitalization. Its stock has risen 27% over the past 12 months compared with a 63% increase in the tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite Index(.IXIC).</p>\n<p>Netflix said it did not believe competition changed materially in the quarter or impacted its new sign-ups \"as the over-forecast was across all of our regions.\"</p>\n<p>The company projected membership growth would accelerate in the second half of the year when it releases new seasons of \"You,\" \"Money Heist,\" and \"The Witcher\" and action movie \"Red Notice,\" among other titles.</p>\n<p>A year ago, Netflix added a record 15.8 million customers as the pandemic forced people around the world to stay home. The company said on Tuesday the pandemic hindered filming new shows.</p>\n<p>\"These dynamics are also contributing to a lighter content slate in the first half of 2021, and hence, we believe slower membership growth,\" the company said in its quarterly letter to shareholders.</p>\n<p>Analysts project people will spend less time streaming from their living rooms as COVID-19 vaccinations spread and more people emerge from their homes.</p>\n<p>Rival media companies have declared streaming their priority and are spending billions to compete with Netflix. Walt Disney Co's(DIS.N)Disney+ crossed 100 million subscribers in March. Netflix's total streaming customers stood at 207.6 million at the end of March.</p>\n<p>Netflix's share of new U.S. subscribers fell to 8.5% during the quarter, down from 16.2% the same period a year ago, according to Kantar Media.</p>\n<p>During the quarter, Netflix lost one of its most popular titles when workplace comedy \"The Office\" moved to Comcast Corp(CMCSA.O)streaming service Peacock.</p>\n<p>Netflix also raised its monthly rates in Britain, Germany, Argentina and Japan during the quarter.</p>\n<p>New customers totaled 1.8 million in Europe, 1.36 million in Asia and 360,000 in Latin America.</p>\n<p>\"What wasn't expected was the strength of the slowdown in international markets, where competition is significantly lower,\" said eMarketer analyst Eric Haggstrom.</p>\n<p>Excluding items, the company earned $3.75 per share in the first quarter, beating analyst estimates of $2.97 per share.</p>\n<p>Revenue rose to $7.16 billion from $5.77 billion during the quarter, edging past estimates of $7.13 billion.</p>\n<p>Net income rose to $1.71 billion, or $3.75 per share, from $709 million, or $1.57 per share, a year earlier.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NFLX":"奈飞"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1131238315","content_text":"Netflix Inc said slower production of TV shows and movies during the pandemic hurt subscriber growth in the first quarter, sending shares of the world's largest streaming service down 8% in Wednesday premarket trading.\n\nRoughly 3.98 million people signed up for Netflix from January through March, below the 6.25 million average projection of analysts surveyed by Refinitiv.\nNetflix estimated it will add just 1 million new streaming customers in the second quarter. Analysts had expected a forecast of nearly 4.8 million.\nShares of Netflix sunk 11% in after-hours trading to $489.28, wiping $25 billion off the company's market capitalization. Its stock has risen 27% over the past 12 months compared with a 63% increase in the tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite Index(.IXIC).\nNetflix said it did not believe competition changed materially in the quarter or impacted its new sign-ups \"as the over-forecast was across all of our regions.\"\nThe company projected membership growth would accelerate in the second half of the year when it releases new seasons of \"You,\" \"Money Heist,\" and \"The Witcher\" and action movie \"Red Notice,\" among other titles.\nA year ago, Netflix added a record 15.8 million customers as the pandemic forced people around the world to stay home. The company said on Tuesday the pandemic hindered filming new shows.\n\"These dynamics are also contributing to a lighter content slate in the first half of 2021, and hence, we believe slower membership growth,\" the company said in its quarterly letter to shareholders.\nAnalysts project people will spend less time streaming from their living rooms as COVID-19 vaccinations spread and more people emerge from their homes.\nRival media companies have declared streaming their priority and are spending billions to compete with Netflix. Walt Disney Co's(DIS.N)Disney+ crossed 100 million subscribers in March. Netflix's total streaming customers stood at 207.6 million at the end of March.\nNetflix's share of new U.S. subscribers fell to 8.5% during the quarter, down from 16.2% the same period a year ago, according to Kantar Media.\nDuring the quarter, Netflix lost one of its most popular titles when workplace comedy \"The Office\" moved to Comcast Corp(CMCSA.O)streaming service Peacock.\nNetflix also raised its monthly rates in Britain, Germany, Argentina and Japan during the quarter.\nNew customers totaled 1.8 million in Europe, 1.36 million in Asia and 360,000 in Latin America.\n\"What wasn't expected was the strength of the slowdown in international markets, where competition is significantly lower,\" said eMarketer analyst Eric Haggstrom.\nExcluding items, the company earned $3.75 per share in the first quarter, beating analyst estimates of $2.97 per share.\nRevenue rose to $7.16 billion from $5.77 billion during the quarter, edging past estimates of $7.13 billion.\nNet income rose to $1.71 billion, or $3.75 per share, from $709 million, or $1.57 per share, a year earlier.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":240,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":344162439,"gmtCreate":1618388733521,"gmtModify":1704710032296,"author":{"id":"3576837088119232","authorId":"3576837088119232","authorIdStr":"3576837088119232","name":"文氏","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/13ab58f27225c31b03dde6b684f98f7e","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576837088119232"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Slightly confusing how this works!","listText":"Slightly confusing how this works!","text":"Slightly confusing how this works!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/344162439","repostId":"2127461210","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2127461210","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1618381800,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2127461210?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-04-14 14:30","market":"hk","language":"en","title":"5 things to watch out for before you invest in SPACs","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2127461210","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"Similarities to the dot.com and subprime bubbles are unmistakable.\n\nThe world's financial exchanges ","content":"<blockquote>\n Similarities to the dot.com and subprime bubbles are unmistakable.\n</blockquote>\n<p>The world's financial exchanges are now in gold-rush mode for IPO listings spurred on by the resurgence of the blank-check company. Now called a SPAC (for special purpose acquisition company), this is rapidly turning into an exercise in financial contagion as <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE\">one</a> global exchange after another contemplates getting in on the action and retail investors look to buy in.</p>\n<p>In 2020 SPACs accounted for more than half of all IPO proceeds raised in the U.S., and just in the month of January 2021 alone, more than 60 SPACS raised nearly $20 billion in proceeds. Meanwhile, the Singapore Exchange Ltd. Is said to be considering new rules that would allow blank-check companies to list sometime later this year. Likewise, the SPAC boom has caught the eye of U.K. exchanges also looking for ways to increase their participation in the listing phenomenon.</p>\n<p>The glaring investor protection issues that are endemic with these listings has CFA Institute on alert. The similarities to the dot.com and subprime bubbles are unmistakable. We think the SEC should immediately establish a working group to examine the marketing, shareholder rights, and investor protections issues involved. Investors considering SPACs need to remember that much can go wrong. Here are five important things retail investors need to know before taking the SPAC plunge:</p>\n<p>1. Blank-check alert: You are giving a SPAC sponsor money with no definite plan on if, when, or how the money will be used to acquire an operating company. You are being told as a retail investor that this is your big chance to get in early. But the sponsor can be as vague as simply saying, \"I have expertise in this industry and will be looking for a promising company with upside potential in this space.\" The potential for misinformation, even fraud, is high in these situations.</p>\n<p>2. The 18-month rule: The sponsor has between 18- and 24 months to locate, negotiate and close an acquisition deal, or they are required to give the SPAC IPO money back, plus interest. Sounds great, but if the SPAC stock you bought is trading based on rumor, innuendo, and no fundamentals before any acquisition happens, you likely paid a premium for it. The money-back rule only applies when there is no deal, and the refund is at the original IPO offering price, typically $10 per share plus interest, not what an investor paid for it in the open market. Moreover, the rate of \"no acquisition\" or lousy acquisition outcomes will likely grow. An increasing probability exists that your blank check \"investment\" will leave you poorer.</p>\n<p>3. Competition for private deals: No matter what the SPAC sponsor tells you , the competition to find a diamond-in-the-rough private company to acquire and take public remains intense. Not only are there hundreds of other SPACs looking for a target, but thousands of expert private equity managers with huge portfolios and lots of dry powder -- an estimated $1.5 trillion in private equity and venture capital funds -- are looking for the very same thing, and they have much longer track records. The odds of a SPAC sponsor finding a suitable, undiscovered gem that is fairly priced and ultimately profitable are mixed at best.</p>\n<p>4. Understand your piece of the SPAC pie: You must understand that even if a target acquisition is made, the amount of the new public company value that ends up in the hands of the SPAC stock buyers can be dreadfully meager. Your slice of the pie comes after the sponsor cut, the acquired company management's cut, and typically another private investor that tops off the capital needed to close the deal. It is not uncommon for the SPAC investors to end up fighting for scraps.</p>\n<p>5. Track record: Take the time to know if the sponsor has any track record in picking private investments. The only way private equity works in the real world of investment management is to find a private equity manager with a demonstrated record of making profitable deals. Picking a SPAC sponsor because they are linked with some sort of celebrity -- but with no real private equity chops -- represents the worst kind of blank check you could ever write.</p>\n<p>Margaret Franklin, CFA, is president and CEO of CFA Institute.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>5 things to watch out for before you invest in SPACs</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n5 things to watch out for before you invest in SPACs\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-04-14 14:30</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<blockquote>\n Similarities to the dot.com and subprime bubbles are unmistakable.\n</blockquote>\n<p>The world's financial exchanges are now in gold-rush mode for IPO listings spurred on by the resurgence of the blank-check company. Now called a SPAC (for special purpose acquisition company), this is rapidly turning into an exercise in financial contagion as <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE\">one</a> global exchange after another contemplates getting in on the action and retail investors look to buy in.</p>\n<p>In 2020 SPACs accounted for more than half of all IPO proceeds raised in the U.S., and just in the month of January 2021 alone, more than 60 SPACS raised nearly $20 billion in proceeds. Meanwhile, the Singapore Exchange Ltd. Is said to be considering new rules that would allow blank-check companies to list sometime later this year. Likewise, the SPAC boom has caught the eye of U.K. exchanges also looking for ways to increase their participation in the listing phenomenon.</p>\n<p>The glaring investor protection issues that are endemic with these listings has CFA Institute on alert. The similarities to the dot.com and subprime bubbles are unmistakable. We think the SEC should immediately establish a working group to examine the marketing, shareholder rights, and investor protections issues involved. Investors considering SPACs need to remember that much can go wrong. Here are five important things retail investors need to know before taking the SPAC plunge:</p>\n<p>1. Blank-check alert: You are giving a SPAC sponsor money with no definite plan on if, when, or how the money will be used to acquire an operating company. You are being told as a retail investor that this is your big chance to get in early. But the sponsor can be as vague as simply saying, \"I have expertise in this industry and will be looking for a promising company with upside potential in this space.\" The potential for misinformation, even fraud, is high in these situations.</p>\n<p>2. The 18-month rule: The sponsor has between 18- and 24 months to locate, negotiate and close an acquisition deal, or they are required to give the SPAC IPO money back, plus interest. Sounds great, but if the SPAC stock you bought is trading based on rumor, innuendo, and no fundamentals before any acquisition happens, you likely paid a premium for it. The money-back rule only applies when there is no deal, and the refund is at the original IPO offering price, typically $10 per share plus interest, not what an investor paid for it in the open market. Moreover, the rate of \"no acquisition\" or lousy acquisition outcomes will likely grow. An increasing probability exists that your blank check \"investment\" will leave you poorer.</p>\n<p>3. Competition for private deals: No matter what the SPAC sponsor tells you , the competition to find a diamond-in-the-rough private company to acquire and take public remains intense. Not only are there hundreds of other SPACs looking for a target, but thousands of expert private equity managers with huge portfolios and lots of dry powder -- an estimated $1.5 trillion in private equity and venture capital funds -- are looking for the very same thing, and they have much longer track records. The odds of a SPAC sponsor finding a suitable, undiscovered gem that is fairly priced and ultimately profitable are mixed at best.</p>\n<p>4. Understand your piece of the SPAC pie: You must understand that even if a target acquisition is made, the amount of the new public company value that ends up in the hands of the SPAC stock buyers can be dreadfully meager. Your slice of the pie comes after the sponsor cut, the acquired company management's cut, and typically another private investor that tops off the capital needed to close the deal. It is not uncommon for the SPAC investors to end up fighting for scraps.</p>\n<p>5. Track record: Take the time to know if the sponsor has any track record in picking private investments. The only way private equity works in the real world of investment management is to find a private equity manager with a demonstrated record of making profitable deals. Picking a SPAC sponsor because they are linked with some sort of celebrity -- but with no real private equity chops -- represents the worst kind of blank check you could ever write.</p>\n<p>Margaret Franklin, CFA, is president and CEO of CFA Institute.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2127461210","content_text":"Similarities to the dot.com and subprime bubbles are unmistakable.\n\nThe world's financial exchanges are now in gold-rush mode for IPO listings spurred on by the resurgence of the blank-check company. Now called a SPAC (for special purpose acquisition company), this is rapidly turning into an exercise in financial contagion as one global exchange after another contemplates getting in on the action and retail investors look to buy in.\nIn 2020 SPACs accounted for more than half of all IPO proceeds raised in the U.S., and just in the month of January 2021 alone, more than 60 SPACS raised nearly $20 billion in proceeds. Meanwhile, the Singapore Exchange Ltd. Is said to be considering new rules that would allow blank-check companies to list sometime later this year. Likewise, the SPAC boom has caught the eye of U.K. exchanges also looking for ways to increase their participation in the listing phenomenon.\nThe glaring investor protection issues that are endemic with these listings has CFA Institute on alert. The similarities to the dot.com and subprime bubbles are unmistakable. We think the SEC should immediately establish a working group to examine the marketing, shareholder rights, and investor protections issues involved. Investors considering SPACs need to remember that much can go wrong. Here are five important things retail investors need to know before taking the SPAC plunge:\n1. Blank-check alert: You are giving a SPAC sponsor money with no definite plan on if, when, or how the money will be used to acquire an operating company. You are being told as a retail investor that this is your big chance to get in early. But the sponsor can be as vague as simply saying, \"I have expertise in this industry and will be looking for a promising company with upside potential in this space.\" The potential for misinformation, even fraud, is high in these situations.\n2. The 18-month rule: The sponsor has between 18- and 24 months to locate, negotiate and close an acquisition deal, or they are required to give the SPAC IPO money back, plus interest. Sounds great, but if the SPAC stock you bought is trading based on rumor, innuendo, and no fundamentals before any acquisition happens, you likely paid a premium for it. The money-back rule only applies when there is no deal, and the refund is at the original IPO offering price, typically $10 per share plus interest, not what an investor paid for it in the open market. Moreover, the rate of \"no acquisition\" or lousy acquisition outcomes will likely grow. An increasing probability exists that your blank check \"investment\" will leave you poorer.\n3. Competition for private deals: No matter what the SPAC sponsor tells you , the competition to find a diamond-in-the-rough private company to acquire and take public remains intense. Not only are there hundreds of other SPACs looking for a target, but thousands of expert private equity managers with huge portfolios and lots of dry powder -- an estimated $1.5 trillion in private equity and venture capital funds -- are looking for the very same thing, and they have much longer track records. The odds of a SPAC sponsor finding a suitable, undiscovered gem that is fairly priced and ultimately profitable are mixed at best.\n4. Understand your piece of the SPAC pie: You must understand that even if a target acquisition is made, the amount of the new public company value that ends up in the hands of the SPAC stock buyers can be dreadfully meager. Your slice of the pie comes after the sponsor cut, the acquired company management's cut, and typically another private investor that tops off the capital needed to close the deal. It is not uncommon for the SPAC investors to end up fighting for scraps.\n5. Track record: Take the time to know if the sponsor has any track record in picking private investments. The only way private equity works in the real world of investment management is to find a private equity manager with a demonstrated record of making profitable deals. Picking a SPAC sponsor because they are linked with some sort of celebrity -- but with no real private equity chops -- represents the worst kind of blank check you could ever write.\nMargaret Franklin, CFA, is president and CEO of CFA Institute.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":163,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}