uiv personal page - To The Moon

uiv

uiv

No personal profile

0Follow

2Followers

0Topic

0Badge

2022-06-02

$Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation(HYMC)$Up

2022-04-18

$Camber Energy(CEI)$up

2022-06-18

$Indonesia Energy Corp Ltd.(INDO)$😭😭😭😭

2022-05-01

$Bit Digital, Inc.(BTBT)$😓

2022-05-21

$Bit Digital, Inc.(BTBT)$😓

2022-05-04

$Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation(HYMC)$up

2022-04-13

$维珍银河(SPCE)$up

2022-06-19

$Bit Digital, Inc.(BTBT)$😭😓

2022-06-16

$Indonesia Energy Corp Ltd.(INDO)$😂😂😂

2022-07-15

$亿邦国际(EBON)$🙏🏻

Go to Tiger App to see more news

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"userPageInfo":{"id":"3576892531232178","uuid":"3576892531232178","gmtCreate":1613996560119,"gmtModify":1669216794773,"name":"uiv","pinyin":"uiv","introduction":"","introductionEn":"","signature":"","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/522ae5f11b7bc763293c30c3a20671c9","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":2,"headSize":0,"tweetSize":230,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":3,"name":"书生虎","nameTw":"書生虎","represent":"努力向上","factor":"发布10条非转发主帖,其中5条获得他人回复或点赞","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":"success","userBadges":[{"badgeId":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493-3","templateUuid":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493","name":" Tiger Idol","description":"Join the tiger community for 1500 days","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8b40ae7da5bf081a1c84df14bf9e6367","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f160eceddd7c284a8e1136557615cfad","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/11792805c468334a9b31c39f95a41c6a","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2025.04.03","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be-3","templateUuid":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be","name":"Legendary Trader","description":"Total number of securities or futures transactions reached 300","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/656db16598a0b8f21429e10d6c1cb033","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/03f10910d4dd9234f9b5702a3342193a","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0c767e35268feb729d50d3fa9a386c5a","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2022.12.27","exceedPercentage":"93.30%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100},{"badgeId":"44212b71d0be4ec88898348dbe882e03-2","templateUuid":"44212b71d0be4ec88898348dbe882e03","name":"Executive Tiger","description":"The transaction amount of the securities account reaches $300,000","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9d20b23f1b6335407f882bc5c2ad12c0","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ada3b4533518ace8404a3f6dd192bd29","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/177f283ba21d1c077054dac07f88f3bd","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2022.04.15","exceedPercentage":"80.12%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1101},{"badgeId":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789-1","templateUuid":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789","name":"Knowledgeable Investor","description":"Traded more than 10 stocks","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e74cc24115c4fbae6154ec1b1041bf47","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d48265cbfd97c57f9048db29f22227b0","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76c6d6898b073c77e1c537ebe9ac1c57","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2022.02.12","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1102},{"badgeId":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84-1","templateUuid":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84","name":"Real Trader","description":"Completed a transaction","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2022.01.06","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":5,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":null,"starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"hot","tweets":[{"id":9943159109,"gmtCreate":1679301276602,"gmtModify":1679301280152,"author":{"id":"3576892531232178","authorId":"3576892531232178","name":"uiv","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/522ae5f11b7bc763293c30c3a20671c9","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576892531232178","authorIdStr":"3576892531232178"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👌🏻","listText":"👌🏻","text":"👌🏻","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9943159109","repostId":"1193257708","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1193257708","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"为用户提供金融资讯、行情、数据，旨在帮助投资者理解世界，做投资决策。","home_visible":1,"media_name":"老虎资讯综合","id":"102","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1679300610,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1193257708?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2023-03-20 16:23","market":"us","language":"zh","title":"Movement | Plunge! Credit Suisse fell more than 60% premarket, First Republic fell more than 21%","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1193257708","media":"老虎资讯综合","summary":"3月20日，美股指期货下跌，道指期货跌0.79%，纳指期货跌0.42%，标普500指数期货跌0.66%。瑞士信贷盘前跌逾60%，瑞银跌超12%，瑞银同意以30亿瑞郎收购瑞士信贷。银行股盘前下跌，瑞银跌","content":"<p><html><head></head><body>On March 20th, U.S. stock index futures fell, with Dow futures falling by 0.79%, Nasdaq futures falling by 0.42% and S&P 500 futures falling by 0.66%.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f42f0b659d0b7fc24168733bf0f4013c\" tg-width=\"828\" tg-height=\"246\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CS\">Credit Suisse</a>It fell more than 60% before the market,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/UBS\">UBS</a>fell by more than 12%,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/UBS\">UBS</a>Agreed to buy for CHF 3 billion<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CS\">Credit Suisse</a>。</p><p>Bank stocks fell in the premarket,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/UBS\">UBS</a>The decline widened to 12%,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DB\">Deutsche Bank</a>Fell more than 9%, Barclays fell more than 7%,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/HSBC\">HSBC</a>fell by more than 5%,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/C\">Citigroup</a>、<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/WFC\">Wells Fargo</a>It fell by more than 2%.</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FRC\">First Republic Bank</a>It fell more than 21% before the market, and the bank was downgraded twice by S&P in a week.</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BBBY\">3B Home Furnishing</a>It fell more than 13% before the market, and it plans to carry out a reverse stock split.</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SCHW\">Charles Schwab</a>It fell more than 3% before the market, and the market was worried that it also faced liquidity problems.</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DOYU\">Betta fish</a>It rose nearly 6% before the market, and the performance in the fourth quarter of last year exceeded expectations.</p><p>Popular Chinese stocks fell before the market,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BILI\">Bilibili</a>Down nearly 4%,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LI\">Li Auto</a>、<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/IQ\">iQIYI</a>It fell by more than 3%,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/XPEV\">XPeng Motors</a>It fell by more than 2%.</p><p>Oil stocks fell in the premarket,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TTE\">Total</a>Down nearly 4%,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BP\">BP</a>、<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/XOM\">ExxonMobil</a>It fell by more than 2%.</p><p></body></html></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Movement | Plunge! Credit Suisse fell more than 60% premarket, First Republic fell more than 21%</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nMovement | Plunge! Credit Suisse fell more than 60% premarket, First Republic fell more than 21%\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/102\">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">老虎资讯综合 </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2023-03-20 16:23</p>\n</div>\n</a>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><html><head></head><body>On March 20th, U.S. stock index futures fell, with Dow futures falling by 0.79%, Nasdaq futures falling by 0.42% and S&P 500 futures falling by 0.66%.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f42f0b659d0b7fc24168733bf0f4013c\" tg-width=\"828\" tg-height=\"246\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CS\">Credit Suisse</a>It fell more than 60% before the market,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/UBS\">UBS</a>fell by more than 12%,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/UBS\">UBS</a>Agreed to buy for CHF 3 billion<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CS\">Credit Suisse</a>。</p><p>Bank stocks fell in the premarket,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/UBS\">UBS</a>The decline widened to 12%,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DB\">Deutsche Bank</a>Fell more than 9%, Barclays fell more than 7%,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/HSBC\">HSBC</a>fell by more than 5%,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/C\">Citigroup</a>、<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/WFC\">Wells Fargo</a>It fell by more than 2%.</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FRC\">First Republic Bank</a>It fell more than 21% before the market, and the bank was downgraded twice by S&P in a week.</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BBBY\">3B Home Furnishing</a>It fell more than 13% before the market, and it plans to carry out a reverse stock split.</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SCHW\">Charles Schwab</a>It fell more than 3% before the market, and the market was worried that it also faced liquidity problems.</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DOYU\">Betta fish</a>It rose nearly 6% before the market, and the performance in the fourth quarter of last year exceeded expectations.</p><p>Popular Chinese stocks fell before the market,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BILI\">Bilibili</a>Down nearly 4%,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LI\">Li Auto</a>、<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/IQ\">iQIYI</a>It fell by more than 3%,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/XPEV\">XPeng Motors</a>It fell by more than 2%.</p><p>Oil stocks fell in the premarket,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TTE\">Total</a>Down nearly 4%,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BP\">BP</a>、<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/XOM\">ExxonMobil</a>It fell by more than 2%.</p><p></body></html></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a00dac9da971ee0e08b72a17d0d0b507","relate_stocks":{"BK4585":"ETF&股票定投概念",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite","BK4548":"巴美列捷福持仓","LU0266013472.USD":"AXA WF - Framlington Longevity Economy A Cap USD","BK4552":"Archegos爆仓风波概念",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","BK4118":"综合性资本市场","BK4589":"SVB概念",".DJI":"道琼斯","BK4211":"区域性银行","BK4588":"碎股"},"source_url":"","is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1193257708","content_text":"3月20日，美股指期货下跌，道指期货跌0.79%，纳指期货跌0.42%，标普500指数期货跌0.66%。瑞士信贷盘前跌逾60%，瑞银跌超12%，瑞银同意以30亿瑞郎收购瑞士信贷。银行股盘前下跌，瑞银跌幅扩大至12%，德意志银行跌超9%，巴克莱跌超7%，汇丰跌超5%，花旗、富国银行跌超2%。第一共和银行盘前跌超21%，该行遭标普一周内两次下调评级。3B家居盘前跌超13%，计划进行反向拆股。嘉信理财盘前跌超3%，市场担忧其也面临流动性问题。斗鱼盘前涨近6%，去年四季度业绩超预期。热门中概股盘前下跌，哔哩哔哩跌近4%，理想汽车、爱奇艺跌超3%，小鹏汽车跌超2%。石油股盘前下跌，道达尔跌近4%，英国石油、埃克森美孚跌超2%。","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".IXIC":0.9,"CS":0.9,"FRC":0.9,".SPX":0.9,".DJI":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2843,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9943961832,"gmtCreate":1679048423427,"gmtModify":1679048427580,"author":{"id":"3576892531232178","authorId":"3576892531232178","name":"uiv","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/522ae5f11b7bc763293c30c3a20671c9","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576892531232178","authorIdStr":"3576892531232178"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👌🏻","listText":"👌🏻","text":"👌🏻","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9943961832","repostId":"1188611512","repostType":2,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2710,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9949774665,"gmtCreate":1678938516657,"gmtModify":1678938520632,"author":{"id":"3576892531232178","authorId":"3576892531232178","name":"uiv","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/522ae5f11b7bc763293c30c3a20671c9","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576892531232178","authorIdStr":"3576892531232178"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👌🏻","listText":"👌🏻","text":"👌🏻","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9949774665","repostId":"2319875342","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2319875342","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1678915920,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2319875342?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2023-03-16 05:32","market":"sh","language":"zh","title":"Foreign media headlines | Credit Suisse crisis dominates the market, bank stocks suffer another heavy hit","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2319875342","media":"环球市场播报","summary":"　　美国地区性银行倒闭掀起的风暴过去才不到几天，瑞信带来的新一轮动荡又引得全球市场风声鹤唳。　　瑞信股价暴跌30%点燃了金融股的抛售狂潮，就连摩根大通、富国银行、花旗集团等银行巨头也未能幸免。标普500指数超过90%成分股下跌，欧洲股市基准指数跌幅一度达到3%。布伦特原油跌破每桶75美元，为2021年末以来首次。两名知情人士表示，瑞信还要求瑞士金融监管机构Finma对其表示支持，但两家机构都尚未决定公开干预。","content":"<p><html><head></head><body><b>The headlines that the global financial media paid common attention to last night and this morning mainly include:</b></p><p><b>1. Global risk assets are in grief. Credit Suisse plunged and began to ask the Swiss National Bank for help.</b><b>2. Oil prices fell to 15-month lows Spread of banking crisis weighed on market sentiment</b><b>3、<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GS\">Goldman Sachs</a>Small banks critical to U.S. economy under pressure to cut U.S. GDP forecasts</b><b>4. Deterioration of liquidity in the Treasury Bond market in the United States due to<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SIVB\">Silicon Valley Bank</a>Crisis affects Fed's rate hike path</b><b>5. Chief Investment Officer of JPMorgan Asset Management: US interest rates may have peaked</b><b>6. Given the banking turmoil, the European Central Bank is expected to only rate hike 25 basis points this week</b><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fe57025a82ab72558e8545216c07e0fe\" tg-width=\"550\" tg-height=\"367\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p><b>Global risk assets grieve Credit Suisse plunge begins to call for help from the Swiss National Bank</b></p><p>Less than a few days after the storm caused by the failure of regional banks in the United States, the new round of turmoil brought by Credit Suisse has caused a turmoil in global markets.</p><p>A 30% plunge in Credit Suisse's stock price ignited a selling frenzy in financial stocks, even<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/JPM\">JPMorgan Chase</a>、<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/WFC\">Wells Fargo</a>Banking giants such as Citigroup and Citigroup have not been spared. More than 90% of the constituent stocks of the S&P 500 fell, and the benchmark European stock market fell 3% at one point. Brent crude fell below $75 a barrel for the first time since late 2021.</p><p>Credit Suisse turns to SNB for help</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CS\">Credit Suisse</a>Call on the Swiss National Bank to publicly support it. Credit Suisse has also asked Swiss financial regulator Finma to show its support, but neither has decided to intervene publicly, two people familiar with the matter said. Opimas analyst Octavio Marenzi said the SNB may have to intervene and help Credit Suisse, which looks inevitable. The SNB and the Swiss government must be fully aware that the bankruptcy of Credit Suisse, or even any loss to depositors, will destroy Switzerland's reputation as a financial hub.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2cbb9edc2db693872fddded8b95e1714\" tg-width=\"550\" tg-height=\"310\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p><b>Oil prices hit 15-month low as spreading banking crisis weighs on sentiment</b></p><p>Crude oil extended its losses Wednesday as turmoil in the banking sector continued to roil markets.</p><p>WTI futures fell below $68 a barrel and Brent crude fell below $75, both for the first time since December 2021. The drop in crude oil prices reflected worries in broader financial markets and was also influenced by a pessimistic report from the International Energy Agency (IEA). The report predicts global supply will \"easily\" exceed demand in the first half of the year. The likelihood of a rate hike when the Fed meets next week also weighs on.</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/USEG\">U.S. Energy</a>The latest weekly report of the Information Administration shows a slight increase in crude oil inventories, which is basically in line with expectations.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a7b652b5b1ab65192a35565ded6704c8\" tg-width=\"550\" tg-height=\"310\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p><b>Goldman Sachs Cuts U.S. GDP Forecast Small Banks Vital to U.S. Economy Under Pressure</b></p><p>Goldman Sachs on Wednesday cut its U.S. economic growth forecast for 2023, citing reduced lending by small and medium-sized banks amid turmoil in the broader financial system.</p><p>Analysts believe the credit contraction will lead to a sharp tightening of bank lending standards, dragging down economic growth already affected by tightening in recent quarters.</p><p>Banks with less than $250 billion in assets account for about 50% of U.S. commercial and industrial lending.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bba315461049b40ef35856313ba63a76\" tg-width=\"550\" tg-height=\"309\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p><b>Deteriorating liquidity in U.S. Treasury Bond market affects Fed's rate hike path due to Silicon Valley Bank crisis</b></p><p>Liquidity in the world's largest bond market is deteriorating as the U.S. banking crisis obscures the Federal Reserve's monetary policy outlook.</p><p>The spread between bid and ask quotes for the 2-year, 10-year and 30-year U.S. Treasury Bond rose Tuesday to its highest level in at least six months, aggregated data showed. The 10-year Treasury yield reached 34 basis points of volatility on Monday, the largest since the start of the COVID pandemic in 2020.</p><p>Eugene Leow, senior interest rate strategist at DBS Bank in Singapore, said the widening bid-ask spread reflected increased market volatility, causing market participants to act cautiously.</p><p>Deteriorating liquidity predictions suggest uncertainty about the Fed's rate hike path after the failure of three U.S. banks highlighted the \"lethality\" of rising borrowing costs.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5bdac12f50770d09a88f85bddef3bce4\" tg-width=\"550\" tg-height=\"383\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p><b>Chief Investment Officer of JPMorgan Asset Management: U.S. Interest Rates May Have Peaked</b></p><p>Bob Michele, chief investment officer of JPMorgan Asset Management, had previously warned that turmoil in the banking sector would ripple across financial markets and the economy, leading to a hard landing for the U.S. economy. Now, he expects the Fed to suspend its rate hike next week.</p><p>Michele said a U.S. recession is \"inevitable\" and that the best investment strategy right now is to stick to high-quality bonds. He expects the U.S. Treasury Bond yield curve to fall across the board to a minimum of 3% by August. He also said that interest rates may have peaked because inflation was \"yesterday's battle\" and maintaining financial stability should now be the Fed's top priority.</p><p>The collapse of Silicon Valley Bank and growing doubts about Credit Suisse's financial outlook have prompted traders to cut their bets on the magnitude of the next rate hike. The market is worried that the collapse of the banking sector could have an impact, putting an already fragile economy at risk.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e0211074d94faa6063a3fdfbd445c899\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"342\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p><b>Given the banking turmoil, the ECB expects only 25 basis points from rate hike this week</b></p><p>Economic research expects the ECB to drop its previous rate hike guidance of 50 basis points at its meeting this week and cut its rate hike to half, given market concerns about the health of the financial sector.</p><p>Economists David Powell, Maeva Cousin and Jamie Rush have adjusted their expectations for the ECB's upcoming rate hike decision, now expecting only 25 basis points in rate hike.</p><p>\"Is Credit Suisse too big to fail? Maybe, but it is undoubtedly too big to ignore,\" they said in a note on Wednesday. \"Economic research now expects the MC to proceed more cautiously than previously suggested.\"</p><p>Traders also cut their bets on the magnitude of Thursday's rate hike, despite European Central Bank President Christine Lagarde earlier this month calling it \"very, very likely\" rate hike 50 basis points.</p><p></body></html></p>","source":"sina","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Foreign media headlines | Credit Suisse crisis dominates the market, bank stocks suffer another heavy hit</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nForeign media headlines | Credit Suisse crisis dominates the market, bank stocks suffer another heavy hit\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">环球市场播报</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2023-03-16 05:32</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><html><head></head><body><b>The headlines that the global financial media paid common attention to last night and this morning mainly include:</b></p><p><b>1. Global risk assets are in grief. Credit Suisse plunged and began to ask the Swiss National Bank for help.</b><b>2. Oil prices fell to 15-month lows Spread of banking crisis weighed on market sentiment</b><b>3、<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GS\">Goldman Sachs</a>Small banks critical to U.S. economy under pressure to cut U.S. GDP forecasts</b><b>4. Deterioration of liquidity in the Treasury Bond market in the United States due to<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SIVB\">Silicon Valley Bank</a>Crisis affects Fed's rate hike path</b><b>5. Chief Investment Officer of JPMorgan Asset Management: US interest rates may have peaked</b><b>6. Given the banking turmoil, the European Central Bank is expected to only rate hike 25 basis points this week</b><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fe57025a82ab72558e8545216c07e0fe\" tg-width=\"550\" tg-height=\"367\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p><b>Global risk assets grieve Credit Suisse plunge begins to call for help from the Swiss National Bank</b></p><p>Less than a few days after the storm caused by the failure of regional banks in the United States, the new round of turmoil brought by Credit Suisse has caused a turmoil in global markets.</p><p>A 30% plunge in Credit Suisse's stock price ignited a selling frenzy in financial stocks, even<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/JPM\">JPMorgan Chase</a>、<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/WFC\">Wells Fargo</a>Banking giants such as Citigroup and Citigroup have not been spared. More than 90% of the constituent stocks of the S&P 500 fell, and the benchmark European stock market fell 3% at one point. Brent crude fell below $75 a barrel for the first time since late 2021.</p><p>Credit Suisse turns to SNB for help</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CS\">Credit Suisse</a>Call on the Swiss National Bank to publicly support it. Credit Suisse has also asked Swiss financial regulator Finma to show its support, but neither has decided to intervene publicly, two people familiar with the matter said. Opimas analyst Octavio Marenzi said the SNB may have to intervene and help Credit Suisse, which looks inevitable. The SNB and the Swiss government must be fully aware that the bankruptcy of Credit Suisse, or even any loss to depositors, will destroy Switzerland's reputation as a financial hub.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2cbb9edc2db693872fddded8b95e1714\" tg-width=\"550\" tg-height=\"310\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p><b>Oil prices hit 15-month low as spreading banking crisis weighs on sentiment</b></p><p>Crude oil extended its losses Wednesday as turmoil in the banking sector continued to roil markets.</p><p>WTI futures fell below $68 a barrel and Brent crude fell below $75, both for the first time since December 2021. The drop in crude oil prices reflected worries in broader financial markets and was also influenced by a pessimistic report from the International Energy Agency (IEA). The report predicts global supply will \"easily\" exceed demand in the first half of the year. The likelihood of a rate hike when the Fed meets next week also weighs on.</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/USEG\">U.S. Energy</a>The latest weekly report of the Information Administration shows a slight increase in crude oil inventories, which is basically in line with expectations.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a7b652b5b1ab65192a35565ded6704c8\" tg-width=\"550\" tg-height=\"310\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p><b>Goldman Sachs Cuts U.S. GDP Forecast Small Banks Vital to U.S. Economy Under Pressure</b></p><p>Goldman Sachs on Wednesday cut its U.S. economic growth forecast for 2023, citing reduced lending by small and medium-sized banks amid turmoil in the broader financial system.</p><p>Analysts believe the credit contraction will lead to a sharp tightening of bank lending standards, dragging down economic growth already affected by tightening in recent quarters.</p><p>Banks with less than $250 billion in assets account for about 50% of U.S. commercial and industrial lending.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bba315461049b40ef35856313ba63a76\" tg-width=\"550\" tg-height=\"309\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p><b>Deteriorating liquidity in U.S. Treasury Bond market affects Fed's rate hike path due to Silicon Valley Bank crisis</b></p><p>Liquidity in the world's largest bond market is deteriorating as the U.S. banking crisis obscures the Federal Reserve's monetary policy outlook.</p><p>The spread between bid and ask quotes for the 2-year, 10-year and 30-year U.S. Treasury Bond rose Tuesday to its highest level in at least six months, aggregated data showed. The 10-year Treasury yield reached 34 basis points of volatility on Monday, the largest since the start of the COVID pandemic in 2020.</p><p>Eugene Leow, senior interest rate strategist at DBS Bank in Singapore, said the widening bid-ask spread reflected increased market volatility, causing market participants to act cautiously.</p><p>Deteriorating liquidity predictions suggest uncertainty about the Fed's rate hike path after the failure of three U.S. banks highlighted the \"lethality\" of rising borrowing costs.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5bdac12f50770d09a88f85bddef3bce4\" tg-width=\"550\" tg-height=\"383\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p><b>Chief Investment Officer of JPMorgan Asset Management: U.S. Interest Rates May Have Peaked</b></p><p>Bob Michele, chief investment officer of JPMorgan Asset Management, had previously warned that turmoil in the banking sector would ripple across financial markets and the economy, leading to a hard landing for the U.S. economy. Now, he expects the Fed to suspend its rate hike next week.</p><p>Michele said a U.S. recession is \"inevitable\" and that the best investment strategy right now is to stick to high-quality bonds. He expects the U.S. Treasury Bond yield curve to fall across the board to a minimum of 3% by August. He also said that interest rates may have peaked because inflation was \"yesterday's battle\" and maintaining financial stability should now be the Fed's top priority.</p><p>The collapse of Silicon Valley Bank and growing doubts about Credit Suisse's financial outlook have prompted traders to cut their bets on the magnitude of the next rate hike. The market is worried that the collapse of the banking sector could have an impact, putting an already fragile economy at risk.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e0211074d94faa6063a3fdfbd445c899\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"342\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p><b>Given the banking turmoil, the ECB expects only 25 basis points from rate hike this week</b></p><p>Economic research expects the ECB to drop its previous rate hike guidance of 50 basis points at its meeting this week and cut its rate hike to half, given market concerns about the health of the financial sector.</p><p>Economists David Powell, Maeva Cousin and Jamie Rush have adjusted their expectations for the ECB's upcoming rate hike decision, now expecting only 25 basis points in rate hike.</p><p>\"Is Credit Suisse too big to fail? Maybe, but it is undoubtedly too big to ignore,\" they said in a note on Wednesday. \"Economic research now expects the MC to proceed more cautiously than previously suggested.\"</p><p>Traders also cut their bets on the magnitude of Thursday's rate hike, despite European Central Bank President Christine Lagarde earlier this month calling it \"very, very likely\" rate hike 50 basis points.</p><p></body></html></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> source：<a href=\"https://finance.sina.com.cn/stock/usstock/c/2023-03-16/doc-imykyzsn1451326.shtml\">环球市场播报</a></p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fe57025a82ab72558e8545216c07e0fe","relate_stocks":{"GOVT":"iShares安硕核心美国国债ETF","BK4585":"ETF&股票定投概念","SHY":"债券指数ETF-iShares Barclays 1-3年国债","BK4533":"AQR资本管理(全球第二大对冲基金)","HSI":"恒生指数","TLT":"20+年以上美国国债ETF-iShares",".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite","IEF":"债券指数ETF-iShares Barclays 7-10年","BK4127":"投资银行业与经纪业","BK4504":"桥水持仓","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓","BK4588":"碎股","BK4552":"Archegos爆仓风波概念","IE00BSNM7G36.USD":"NEUBERGER BERMAN SYSTEMATIC GLOBAL SUSTAINABLE VALUE \"A\" (USD) ACC","IEI":"iShares Barclays 3-7 Year Trea","BND":"债券指数ETF-Vanguard美国"},"source_url":"https://finance.sina.com.cn/stock/usstock/c/2023-03-16/doc-imykyzsn1451326.shtml","is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/b0d1b7e8843deea78cc308b15114de44","article_id":"2319875342","content_text":"全球财经媒体昨夜今晨共同关注的头条新闻主要有：1、全球风险资产哀鸿遍野 瑞信暴跌 开始向瑞士央行求救2、油价跌至15个月低点 银行业危机蔓延打压市场情绪3、高盛下调美国GDP预期 对美国经济至关重要的小银行面临压力4、美国国债市场流动性恶化 因硅谷银行危机影响美联储加息路径5、摩根资产管理首席投资官：美国利率或已见顶6、鉴于银行业动荡 欧洲央行本周料仅加息25个基点全球风险资产哀鸿遍野 瑞信暴跌 开始向瑞士央行求救美国地区性银行倒闭掀起的风暴过去才不到几天，瑞信带来的新一轮动荡又引得全球市场风声鹤唳。瑞信股价暴跌30%点燃了金融股的抛售狂潮，就连摩根大通、富国银行、花旗集团等银行巨头也未能幸免。标普500指数超过90%成分股下跌，欧洲股市基准指数跌幅一度达到3%。 布伦特原油跌破每桶75美元，为2021年末以来首次。瑞信向瑞士央行求救瑞士信贷呼吁瑞士央行公开对其表示支持。两名知情人士表示，瑞信还要求瑞士金融监管机构Finma对其表示支持，但两家机构都尚未决定公开干预。Opimas分析师Octavio Marenzi表示，瑞士央行可能不得不干预并帮助瑞信，这看起来无法避免。瑞士央行和瑞士政府必须充分意识到，瑞信的破产，甚至储户的任何损失，都将摧毁瑞士作为金融中心的声誉。油价跌至15个月低点 银行业危机蔓延打压市场情绪随着银行业的动荡继续扰乱市场，原油周三延续了跌势。WTI期货跌破每桶68美元，布伦特原油跌破75美元，均为2021年12月以来首次。原油价格下跌反映了更广泛金融市场内的忧虑情绪，也受到国际能源署（IEA）一份悲观报告的影响。该报告预测今年上半年全球供应将“轻松”超过需求。美联储下周开会时加息的可能性也带来压力。美国能源信息管理局的最新周报显示原油库存略有上升，基本符合预期。高盛下调美国GDP预期 对美国经济至关重要的小银行面临压力高盛周三下调了美国2023年的经济增长预测，理由是在更广泛的金融体系动荡之际，中小银行的贷款减少。分析师们认为，信贷收缩将导致银行贷款标准大幅收紧，拖累已经受到近几个季度收紧政策影响的经济增长。资产不足2500亿美元的银行约占美国商业和工业贷款的50%。美国国债市场流动性恶化 因硅谷银行危机影响美联储加息路径随着美国银行业危机模糊了美联储货币政策前景，全球最大债券市场流动性正在变差。汇总的数据显示，2年期、10年期和30年期美国国债的买卖报价之差周二升至至少六个月来的最高水平。10年期美债收益率周一的波幅达到34个基点，为2020年新冠疫情开始以来最大。星展银行驻新加坡高级利率策略师Eugene Leow表示，买卖价差扩大反映了市场波动加剧，令市场参与者行事谨慎。流动性恶化预表明，在美国三家银行倒闭凸显出借贷成本上升的“杀伤力”后，美联储加息路径存在不确定性。摩根资产管理首席投资官：美国利率或已见顶摩根资产管理的首席投资官Bob Michele此前曾警告称，银行业的动荡将波及整个金融市场和经济，导致美国经济出现硬着陆。如今，他预计美联储下周将暂停加息。Michele表示，美国经济衰退是“不可避免的”，目前最好的投资策略是坚持持有高质量债券。他预计到8月美国国债收益率曲线将全线降至最低3%的水平。他还表示，利率可能已经见顶，因为通胀已是“昨日的战役”，如今维护金融稳定才应是美联储的首要任务。硅谷银行的倒闭以及对瑞信财务前景的疑虑与日俱增，促使交易员下调对接下来加息幅度的押注。市场担心银行业的崩溃恐形成冲击，使本已脆弱的经济面临风险。鉴于银行业动荡 欧洲央行本周料仅加息25个基点经济研究预计，鉴于市场对金融部门健康状况的担忧，欧洲央行将在本周的会议上放弃先前加息50个基点的指引，将加息幅度缩减至一半。经济学家David Powell，Maeva Cousin和Jamie Rush调整了他们对欧洲央行即将公布的加息决定的预期，目前预计仅加息25个基点。“瑞信是否规模太大不容倒闭？也许吧，但毫无疑问的是，它的规模太大，以至于不容忽视，”他们周三在一份报告中表示，“经济研究现在预计，管委会相较于此前的暗示将更为谨慎地行事。”交易员们也下调了对周四加息幅度的押注，尽管欧洲央行行长克里斯蒂娜·拉加德本月早些时候称“非常、非常有可能”加息50个基点。","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"HSI":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,"ZFmain":0.6,"TNmain":0.6,"IEF":0.6,"GOVT":0.6,"TLT":0.6,"SHY":0.6,"ZBmain":0.6,".DJI":0.9,"UBmain":0.6,"ZTmain":0.6,"IEI":0.6,"BND":1}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3261,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9940815580,"gmtCreate":1677808408841,"gmtModify":1677808413813,"author":{"id":"3576892531232178","authorId":"3576892531232178","name":"uiv","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/522ae5f11b7bc763293c30c3a20671c9","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576892531232178","authorIdStr":"3576892531232178"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👌🏻","listText":"👌🏻","text":"👌🏻","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9940815580","repostId":"1110233179","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1110233179","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"为用户提供金融资讯、行情、数据，旨在帮助投资者理解世界，做投资决策。","home_visible":1,"media_name":"老虎资讯综合","id":"102","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1677801485,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1110233179?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2023-03-03 07:58","market":"sh","language":"zh","title":"Last night and this morning | Pigeons boosted, and the Dow closed up more than 1%! Tesla plunges nearly 6%, currency circle bank explosion plunges 58%","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1110233179","media":"老虎资讯综合","summary":"摘要：①美联储官员鸽声提振，美股收高道指涨超1%；②印度最高法院下令调查阿达尼动荡事件；③美司法部：特朗普应为国会山暴乱事件承担责任。海外行情1、美联储官员鸽声提振美股收涨道指涨超1%美股周四收高。市","content":"<p><html><head></head><body>Abstract: ① The pigeon sound of Federal Reserve officials was boosted, and U.S. stocks closed higher, with the Dow Index rising by more than 1%; ② The Supreme Court of India ordered an investigation into the Adani turmoil; ③ U.S. Department of Justice: Trump should take responsibility for the Capitol Hill riots.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d94117bd542568ef35d0e2c9efcee577\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"1920\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>Overseas Quotes</p><p>1. The pigeon sound of Federal Reserve officials boosted U.S. stocks to close higher, and the Dow rose more than 1%</p><p>U.S. stocks closed higher on Thursday. The market continues to pay attention to earnings reports, economic data and inflation. The Federal Reserve said that it may suspend the rate hike after midsummer this year, because the effects of the previous rate hike may be visible this spring. By the close, the Dow Jones was up 1.05%, the S&P 500 was up 0.76% and the Nasdaq was up 0.73%.</p><p>Silvergate Bank, which started out in the currency circle, closed nearly 58% in thunderstorms, the biggest one-day decline since the company's US IPO. The company announced it could not file its 10-K annual report with the SEC by the March 16 deadline. At the same time, it warned that there may be a problem of insufficient capital, and is assessing the impact of a series of subsequent events on the company's ability to continue as a going concern.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c941ec50befbcdb80ceb3b3a763faba1\" tg-width=\"840\" tg-height=\"470\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/>Big-cap tech stocks mostly rose,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GOOG\">Google</a>、<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSFT\">Microsoft</a>It rose by more than 1%; Facebook,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">Apple</a>Small gains;<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMZN\">Amazon</a>、<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NFLX\">Netflix</a>Slightly down, just released the \"new chapter of the grand plan\"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">Tesla</a>It closed down nearly 5.9%, the biggest closing drop since Jan. 30.</p><p>2. Popular Chinese concept stocks rose generally<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BILI\">Bilibili</a>Up more than 9%</p><p>Popular Chinese stocks rose generally, with Bilibili rising by more than 9% and Nasdaq China Golden Dragon Index rising by 2.66%.<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/IQ\">iQIYI</a>rose by more than 8%,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/XPEV\">XPeng Motors</a>、<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PDD\">Pinduoduo</a>Up more than 5%,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NTES\">Netease</a>、<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BIDU\">Baidu</a>rose by more than 4%,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LI\">Li Auto</a>rose by more than 3%,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NIO\">Nio</a>、<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/JD\">Jingdong</a>It rose by more than 2%, and Weibo rose by more than 1%.<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ACH\">Aluminum Corporation of China</a>It fell by more than 4%,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BABA\">Alibaba</a>、<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/VIPS\">Vipshop</a>Down slightly.</p><p>3. The main indexes of European stocks closed higher<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/VUKE.UK\">FTSE 100 UK</a>Index rose 0.37%</p><p>Major European stock indexes closed higher on Thursday, with Germany's DAX30 index rising 0.15%, Britain's FTSE 100 index rising 0.37%, France's CAC40 index rising 0.69% and the European Stoxx 50 index rising 0.59%.</p><p>4. U.S. WTI crude oil closed 0.6% higher on Thursday, hitting a two-week high</p><p>April West Texas Intermediate crude oil rose 47 cents, or 0.6%, to close at $78.16 a barrel on the New York Mercantile Exchange, its highest close since Feb. 16.</p><p>5. New York gold futures closed down 0.3% on Thursday, ending three consecutive gains</p><p>Gold futures for April delivery fell $4.90, or 0.3%, to close at $1,840.50 an ounce on Thursday on the New York Mercantile Exchange.</p><p>Macro News</p><p>1. Senior Federal Reserve officials: There is no need to \"upshift\" rate hike may hit the brakes before the autumn</p><p>On Thursday (March 2nd) local time, Atlanta Fed President Raphael Bostic said that the impact of high interest rates on the economy may not begin to take effect until spring, and he preferred the Fed to rate hike at a slower pace.</p><p>Bostic told the media that he prefers the Fed to rate hike at a slower pace, where interest rate hikes remain at 25 basis points per meeting. \"I think slowness and steadiness are the appropriate course of action, and moving at a moderated pace can reduce the chances of excessive damage to the economy due to rate hike.\"</p><p>Bostic added that the Fed may be close to the point of stopping the rate hike because interest rates have been raised to the restrictive level of 4.5%-4.75%. He also predicted that the bank could suspend its rate hike in the middle to late summer this year.</p><p>2. Nearly one anniversary of the Fed's rate hike: This labor force indicator has not yet shown signs of weakness</p><p>On Thursday (March 2nd) local time, the number of \"initial requests\" announced by the U.S. Department of Labor unexpectedly fell again, indicating that the labor market continues to be strong, which may allow the Federal Reserve to continue its rate hike.</p><p>Specific data shows that in the week ending February 25th, the number of people who applied for unemployment benefits for the first time in the United States recorded 190,000, a decrease of 2,000 from 192,000 in the previous week. The market had previously expected it to rise to 195,000. It is worth mentioning that this is the seventh consecutive week that the data has remained below the 200,000 mark.</p><p>It is understood that the Federal Reserve has had eight consecutive rate hike since March last year, and the cumulative rate hike is as high as 450 basis points. But minutes released last week showed that participants felt that the labour market remained very tight, leading to continued upward pressure on wages and prices, and that further rate hike was still necessary.</p><p>3. The truth is about to come out? India's Supreme Court Orders Inquiry into Adani Unrest</p><p>India's Supreme Court on Thursday set up a committee to investigate the reasons for the share price volatility in the conglomerate owned by billionaire Gautam Adani. The Supreme Court claimed it would investigate oversight management failures that could have led to a massive sell-off of the group's shares, as well as breaches of securities laws by the group.</p><p>In addition, the Supreme Court of India also asked the Securities and Exchange Commission of India (SEBI) to complete the investigation within 2 months into the allegations against Adani Group by US short selling agency Hindenburg Research, including whether there was no disclosure of transactions with related parties and illegal manipulation of stock prices.</p><p>4. US Department of Justice: Trump should be held responsible for the Capitol Hill riots</p><p>On March 2, local time, the U.S. Department of Justice said that former President Trump should take responsibility for the Capitol Hill riots that occurred on January 6, 2021. \"Speaking on issues of public concern is a traditional function of the president, but the traditional function is public communication, and it does not include incitement to imminent private violence,\" said the attorney for the Justice Department's Civil Division.</p><p>Situation between Russia and Ukraine</p><p>1. US officials: US government will announce $400 million worth of aid to Ukraine</p><p>Two U.S. officials and a person familiar with the matter revealed to Reuters on March 2nd local time that the U.S. government will announce material assistance worth $400 million to the Ukrainian army on the 3rd local time.</p><p>2. Russian Deputy Foreign Minister: Russia and the United States held pragmatic dialogue around the New START Treaty</p><p>Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Ryabkov said on March 2 that during the Conference on Disarmament in Geneva, Russia and the United States had contacts and discussions around the New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty. Ryabkov said that the dialogue between the two sides was pragmatic.</p><p>3. Russian Foreign Minister calls for a quick and fair investigation into the \"Nord Stream\" bombing</p><p>According to Russian media reports, Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov on March 2 called for a \"quick and fair\" investigation into the bombing of the Nord Stream natural gas pipeline last September, and said that Russia should participate in the relevant investigation. Lavrov also accused the West of \"shamelessly sabotaging\" Black Sea ports<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/000061\">Agricultural Products</a>Foreign Transport Agreement. He said that Russia has repeatedly expressed dissatisfaction with the implementation of parts of the agreement involving Russia, pointing out that Russian grain and fertilizer exports are still being blocked by Western restrictions.</p><p>Company News</p><p>1、<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/NW/2316372965\" target=\"_blank\">Apple rejects an email app to update ChatGPT feature</a></p><p>Apple has lately blocked an update to an email app over concerns about the potential harm of artificial intelligence, media reported Thursday. The app is called BlueMail, and the app tries to add AI capabilities, using ChatGPT to help users write emails automatically.</p><p>Apple's application review team pointed out in an email to Blix last week that BlueMail contains AI-generated content, but it seems that it has not been filtered at present, which may produce content that is not suitable for all audiences (verbal attacks and sexual content, etc.). It is suggested that BlueMail limit users to 17 years old and older, or add content filtering functions.</p><p>2. Silvergate Bank, which started out by relying on the currency circle, plunged more than 50% after thunderstorms</p><p>Silvergate Bank, which has made a name for itself for providing services to the cryptocurrency industry, closed down 57.72% on Thursday. On the news, the company announced that it could not file its 10-K annual report with the SEC before the March 16 deadline. At the same time, it warned that there may be a problem of insufficient capital, and is assessing the impact of a series of subsequent events on the company's ability to continue as a going concern.</p><p>After the announcement, Coinbase, the largest cryptocurrency exchange in the United States, Paxos, a stablecoin issuer, Galaxy Digital, a financial services company in the currency circle, Cboe Digital, a subsidiary of CME group, and Bitstamp exchanges all announced that they would stop banking business with Silvergate.</p><p>3. The EU is said to release the Microsoft Blizzard acquisition case</p><p>Microsoft is on track to resolve its takeover by the European Union by offering licensing agreements to rivals, media reported Thursday, citing sources<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ATVI\">Activision Blizzard</a>Antitrust concerns. The European Commission plans to make a decision on the deal by April 25 local time and is not expected to require Microsoft to sell assets to get approval, people familiar with the matter said.</p><p>4、<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/F\">Ford Motor</a>Plans to restart production of F-150 Lightning all-electric pickup truck on March 13</p><p>Ford Motor plans to restart production of the F-150 Lightning all-electric pickup truck on March 13, following a shutdown due to an investigation into a battery fire in the vehicle. The arrangement will give battery supplier SK On ample time to restart production and deliver battery packs for electric pickups, the automaker said Thursday.</p><p>5. Cloud computing giant Salesforce's performance exceeded expectations, and its share price soared 11%</p><p>After the bell on Wednesday, U.S. cloud computing giant Salesforce, a component of the Dow Jones Industrial Average, disclosed its fourth-quarter fiscal 2023 earnings results as of the end of January this year. Revenue of $8.38 billion, up 14% year over year, and adjusted earnings of $1.68 per share, both better than market expectations. The company expects fiscal 2024 revenue of $34.5-34.7 billion, better than analyst estimates of $34.05 billion, while announcing an expansion of its buyback program to $20 billion. As a result, Salesforce closed up 11.50% on Thursday.</p><p></body></html></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Last night and this morning | Pigeons boosted, and the Dow closed up more than 1%! Tesla plunges nearly 6%, currency circle bank explosion plunges 58%</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nLast night and this morning | Pigeons boosted, and the Dow closed up more than 1%! Tesla plunges nearly 6%, currency circle bank explosion plunges 58%\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/102\">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">老虎资讯综合 </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2023-03-03 07:58</p>\n</div>\n</a>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><html><head></head><body>Abstract: ① The pigeon sound of Federal Reserve officials was boosted, and U.S. stocks closed higher, with the Dow Index rising by more than 1%; ② The Supreme Court of India ordered an investigation into the Adani turmoil; ③ U.S. Department of Justice: Trump should take responsibility for the Capitol Hill riots.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d94117bd542568ef35d0e2c9efcee577\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"1920\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>Overseas Quotes</p><p>1. The pigeon sound of Federal Reserve officials boosted U.S. stocks to close higher, and the Dow rose more than 1%</p><p>U.S. stocks closed higher on Thursday. The market continues to pay attention to earnings reports, economic data and inflation. The Federal Reserve said that it may suspend the rate hike after midsummer this year, because the effects of the previous rate hike may be visible this spring. By the close, the Dow Jones was up 1.05%, the S&P 500 was up 0.76% and the Nasdaq was up 0.73%.</p><p>Silvergate Bank, which started out in the currency circle, closed nearly 58% in thunderstorms, the biggest one-day decline since the company's US IPO. The company announced it could not file its 10-K annual report with the SEC by the March 16 deadline. At the same time, it warned that there may be a problem of insufficient capital, and is assessing the impact of a series of subsequent events on the company's ability to continue as a going concern.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c941ec50befbcdb80ceb3b3a763faba1\" tg-width=\"840\" tg-height=\"470\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/>Big-cap tech stocks mostly rose,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GOOG\">Google</a>、<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSFT\">Microsoft</a>It rose by more than 1%; Facebook,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">Apple</a>Small gains;<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMZN\">Amazon</a>、<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NFLX\">Netflix</a>Slightly down, just released the \"new chapter of the grand plan\"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">Tesla</a>It closed down nearly 5.9%, the biggest closing drop since Jan. 30.</p><p>2. Popular Chinese concept stocks rose generally<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BILI\">Bilibili</a>Up more than 9%</p><p>Popular Chinese stocks rose generally, with Bilibili rising by more than 9% and Nasdaq China Golden Dragon Index rising by 2.66%.<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/IQ\">iQIYI</a>rose by more than 8%,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/XPEV\">XPeng Motors</a>、<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PDD\">Pinduoduo</a>Up more than 5%,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NTES\">Netease</a>、<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BIDU\">Baidu</a>rose by more than 4%,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LI\">Li Auto</a>rose by more than 3%,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NIO\">Nio</a>、<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/JD\">Jingdong</a>It rose by more than 2%, and Weibo rose by more than 1%.<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ACH\">Aluminum Corporation of China</a>It fell by more than 4%,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BABA\">Alibaba</a>、<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/VIPS\">Vipshop</a>Down slightly.</p><p>3. The main indexes of European stocks closed higher<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/VUKE.UK\">FTSE 100 UK</a>Index rose 0.37%</p><p>Major European stock indexes closed higher on Thursday, with Germany's DAX30 index rising 0.15%, Britain's FTSE 100 index rising 0.37%, France's CAC40 index rising 0.69% and the European Stoxx 50 index rising 0.59%.</p><p>4. U.S. WTI crude oil closed 0.6% higher on Thursday, hitting a two-week high</p><p>April West Texas Intermediate crude oil rose 47 cents, or 0.6%, to close at $78.16 a barrel on the New York Mercantile Exchange, its highest close since Feb. 16.</p><p>5. New York gold futures closed down 0.3% on Thursday, ending three consecutive gains</p><p>Gold futures for April delivery fell $4.90, or 0.3%, to close at $1,840.50 an ounce on Thursday on the New York Mercantile Exchange.</p><p>Macro News</p><p>1. Senior Federal Reserve officials: There is no need to \"upshift\" rate hike may hit the brakes before the autumn</p><p>On Thursday (March 2nd) local time, Atlanta Fed President Raphael Bostic said that the impact of high interest rates on the economy may not begin to take effect until spring, and he preferred the Fed to rate hike at a slower pace.</p><p>Bostic told the media that he prefers the Fed to rate hike at a slower pace, where interest rate hikes remain at 25 basis points per meeting. \"I think slowness and steadiness are the appropriate course of action, and moving at a moderated pace can reduce the chances of excessive damage to the economy due to rate hike.\"</p><p>Bostic added that the Fed may be close to the point of stopping the rate hike because interest rates have been raised to the restrictive level of 4.5%-4.75%. He also predicted that the bank could suspend its rate hike in the middle to late summer this year.</p><p>2. Nearly one anniversary of the Fed's rate hike: This labor force indicator has not yet shown signs of weakness</p><p>On Thursday (March 2nd) local time, the number of \"initial requests\" announced by the U.S. Department of Labor unexpectedly fell again, indicating that the labor market continues to be strong, which may allow the Federal Reserve to continue its rate hike.</p><p>Specific data shows that in the week ending February 25th, the number of people who applied for unemployment benefits for the first time in the United States recorded 190,000, a decrease of 2,000 from 192,000 in the previous week. The market had previously expected it to rise to 195,000. It is worth mentioning that this is the seventh consecutive week that the data has remained below the 200,000 mark.</p><p>It is understood that the Federal Reserve has had eight consecutive rate hike since March last year, and the cumulative rate hike is as high as 450 basis points. But minutes released last week showed that participants felt that the labour market remained very tight, leading to continued upward pressure on wages and prices, and that further rate hike was still necessary.</p><p>3. The truth is about to come out? India's Supreme Court Orders Inquiry into Adani Unrest</p><p>India's Supreme Court on Thursday set up a committee to investigate the reasons for the share price volatility in the conglomerate owned by billionaire Gautam Adani. The Supreme Court claimed it would investigate oversight management failures that could have led to a massive sell-off of the group's shares, as well as breaches of securities laws by the group.</p><p>In addition, the Supreme Court of India also asked the Securities and Exchange Commission of India (SEBI) to complete the investigation within 2 months into the allegations against Adani Group by US short selling agency Hindenburg Research, including whether there was no disclosure of transactions with related parties and illegal manipulation of stock prices.</p><p>4. US Department of Justice: Trump should be held responsible for the Capitol Hill riots</p><p>On March 2, local time, the U.S. Department of Justice said that former President Trump should take responsibility for the Capitol Hill riots that occurred on January 6, 2021. \"Speaking on issues of public concern is a traditional function of the president, but the traditional function is public communication, and it does not include incitement to imminent private violence,\" said the attorney for the Justice Department's Civil Division.</p><p>Situation between Russia and Ukraine</p><p>1. US officials: US government will announce $400 million worth of aid to Ukraine</p><p>Two U.S. officials and a person familiar with the matter revealed to Reuters on March 2nd local time that the U.S. government will announce material assistance worth $400 million to the Ukrainian army on the 3rd local time.</p><p>2. Russian Deputy Foreign Minister: Russia and the United States held pragmatic dialogue around the New START Treaty</p><p>Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Ryabkov said on March 2 that during the Conference on Disarmament in Geneva, Russia and the United States had contacts and discussions around the New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty. Ryabkov said that the dialogue between the two sides was pragmatic.</p><p>3. Russian Foreign Minister calls for a quick and fair investigation into the \"Nord Stream\" bombing</p><p>According to Russian media reports, Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov on March 2 called for a \"quick and fair\" investigation into the bombing of the Nord Stream natural gas pipeline last September, and said that Russia should participate in the relevant investigation. Lavrov also accused the West of \"shamelessly sabotaging\" Black Sea ports<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/000061\">Agricultural Products</a>Foreign Transport Agreement. He said that Russia has repeatedly expressed dissatisfaction with the implementation of parts of the agreement involving Russia, pointing out that Russian grain and fertilizer exports are still being blocked by Western restrictions.</p><p>Company News</p><p>1、<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/NW/2316372965\" target=\"_blank\">Apple rejects an email app to update ChatGPT feature</a></p><p>Apple has lately blocked an update to an email app over concerns about the potential harm of artificial intelligence, media reported Thursday. The app is called BlueMail, and the app tries to add AI capabilities, using ChatGPT to help users write emails automatically.</p><p>Apple's application review team pointed out in an email to Blix last week that BlueMail contains AI-generated content, but it seems that it has not been filtered at present, which may produce content that is not suitable for all audiences (verbal attacks and sexual content, etc.). It is suggested that BlueMail limit users to 17 years old and older, or add content filtering functions.</p><p>2. Silvergate Bank, which started out by relying on the currency circle, plunged more than 50% after thunderstorms</p><p>Silvergate Bank, which has made a name for itself for providing services to the cryptocurrency industry, closed down 57.72% on Thursday. On the news, the company announced that it could not file its 10-K annual report with the SEC before the March 16 deadline. At the same time, it warned that there may be a problem of insufficient capital, and is assessing the impact of a series of subsequent events on the company's ability to continue as a going concern.</p><p>After the announcement, Coinbase, the largest cryptocurrency exchange in the United States, Paxos, a stablecoin issuer, Galaxy Digital, a financial services company in the currency circle, Cboe Digital, a subsidiary of CME group, and Bitstamp exchanges all announced that they would stop banking business with Silvergate.</p><p>3. The EU is said to release the Microsoft Blizzard acquisition case</p><p>Microsoft is on track to resolve its takeover by the European Union by offering licensing agreements to rivals, media reported Thursday, citing sources<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ATVI\">Activision Blizzard</a>Antitrust concerns. The European Commission plans to make a decision on the deal by April 25 local time and is not expected to require Microsoft to sell assets to get approval, people familiar with the matter said.</p><p>4、<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/F\">Ford Motor</a>Plans to restart production of F-150 Lightning all-electric pickup truck on March 13</p><p>Ford Motor plans to restart production of the F-150 Lightning all-electric pickup truck on March 13, following a shutdown due to an investigation into a battery fire in the vehicle. The arrangement will give battery supplier SK On ample time to restart production and deliver battery packs for electric pickups, the automaker said Thursday.</p><p>5. Cloud computing giant Salesforce's performance exceeded expectations, and its share price soared 11%</p><p>After the bell on Wednesday, U.S. cloud computing giant Salesforce, a component of the Dow Jones Industrial Average, disclosed its fourth-quarter fiscal 2023 earnings results as of the end of January this year. Revenue of $8.38 billion, up 14% year over year, and adjusted earnings of $1.68 per share, both better than market expectations. The company expects fiscal 2024 revenue of $34.5-34.7 billion, better than analyst estimates of $34.05 billion, while announcing an expansion of its buyback program to $20 billion. As a result, Salesforce closed up 11.50% on Thursday.</p><p></body></html></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b23574aac95526c9e5c62ebc8dd25130","relate_stocks":{"161121":"银行","DJX":"1/100道琼斯","BK4527":"明星科技股","LU0719512351.SGD":"JPMorgan Funds - US Technology A (acc) SGD","LU0348723411.USD":"ALLIANZ GLOBAL HI-TECH GROWTH \"A\" (USD) INC","LU1720051108.HKD":"ALLIANZ GLOBAL ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE \"AT\" (HKD) ACC",".DJI":"道琼斯","LU0820561909.HKD":"ALLIANZ INCOME AND GROWTH \"AM\" (HKD) INC","LU1861559042.SGD":"日兴方舟颠覆性创新基金B SGD","LU0820561818.USD":"安联收益及增长平衡基金Cl AM DIS","LU0823411888.USD":"法巴消费创新基金 Cap","TSLA":"特斯拉","LU0056508442.USD":"贝莱德世界科技基金A2","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓","LU0097036916.USD":"贝莱德美国增长A2 USD","BK4574":"无人驾驶","LU0943347566.SGD":"安联收益及增长平衡基金AM H2-SGD","LU0234572021.USD":"高盛美国核心股票组合Acc","BK4551":"寇图资本持仓"},"source_url":"","is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1110233179","content_text":"摘要：①美联储官员鸽声提振，美股收高道指涨超1%；②印度最高法院下令调查阿达尼动荡事件；③美司法部：特朗普应为国会山暴乱事件承担责任。海外行情1、美联储官员鸽声提振美股收涨道指涨超1%美股周四收高。市场继续关注财报、经济数据与通胀状况。美联储博斯蒂克称可能在今年仲夏之后暂停加息，因为之前加息的效果可能会在今春显现出来。截止收盘，道琼斯指数涨1.05%，标普500指数涨0.76%，纳斯达克指数涨0.73%。依靠币圈起家的Silvergate银行暴雷收跌近58%，创该公司美国IPO以来最大单日跌幅。公司公告称无法在3月16日的期限之前向SEC提交10-K年报。同时警告可能存在资本金不足的问题，正在评估一系列后续事件对公司持续经营能力的影响。大型科技股多数上涨，谷歌、微软涨超1%；脸书、苹果小幅上涨；亚马逊、奈飞小幅下跌，刚刚发布“宏图新篇章”的特斯拉收跌近5.9%，创1月30日以来最大收盘跌幅。2、热门中概股普涨哔哩哔哩涨超9%热门中概股普涨，哔哩哔哩涨超9%，纳斯达克中国金龙指数涨2.66%。爱奇艺涨超8%，小鹏汽车、拼多多涨超5%，网易、百度涨超4%，理想汽车涨超3%，蔚来、京东涨超2%，微博涨超1%。中国铝业跌超4%，阿里巴巴、唯品会小幅下跌。3、欧股主要指数收涨英国富时100指数涨0.37%欧洲主要股指周四收盘普涨，德国DAX30指数涨0.15%，英国富时100指数涨0.37%，法国CAC40指数涨0.69%，欧洲斯托克50指数涨0.59%。4、周四美国WTI原油收高0.6% 创两周新高纽约商品交易所4月西德克萨斯中质原油价格上涨47美分，涨幅为0.6%，收于每桶78.16美元，创2月16日以来的最高收盘价。5、周四纽约黄金期货收跌0.3% 结束三连涨周四，纽约商品交易所4月交割的黄金期货价格下跌4.90美元，跌幅为0.3%，收于每盎司1840.50美元。宏观新闻1、美联储高官：没有必要“升档”加息 可能在秋季前踩下刹车当地时间周四（3月2日），亚特兰大联储主席博斯蒂克（Raphael Bostic）表示，高利率对经济的影响可能要到春季才会开始发挥效果，他倾向于美联储以较慢的步伐加息。博斯蒂克告诉媒体，他倾向于美联储以较慢的步伐加息，即每次会议的升息幅度保持在25个基点。“我认为缓慢和稳定是适当的行动方案，以有节制的速度前进，可以减少因加息过度损害经济的几率。”博斯蒂克补充称，美联储可能已经接近停止加息的时间点，因为利率已经提升到了4.5%-4.75%的限制性水平。他还预测，该行可能在今年夏季中后期暂停加息。2、美联储启动加息近一周年：这一劳动力指标竟还未显疲态当地时间周四（3月2日），美国劳工部公布的“初请”人数再次意外走低，表明劳动力市场持续强劲，可能会让美联储继续加息。具体数据显示，截至2月25日的一周，美国首次申请失业救济金的人数录得19万人，较前一周的19.2万人减少了2000人，市场先前预计将升至19.5万人。值得一提的是，这还是该数据连续第七周保持在20万关口下方。据了解，美联储自去年3月以来已经连续八次加息，累计加息幅度高达450个基点。但上周发布的会议纪要显示，与会者认为劳动力市场仍然非常紧张，导致工资和价格持续面临上行压力，仍有进一步加息的必要性。3、真相即将大白？印度最高法院下令调查阿达尼动荡事件印度最高法院周四成立了一个委员会，要求调查亿万富翁高塔姆·阿达尼旗下企业集团股价动荡的原因。最高法院声称，将调查可能导致集团股票大规模抛售的监督管理失误，以及该集团违反证券法的行为。此外，印度最高法院还要求印度证券交易委员会(SEBI)在2个月内完成对美国做空机构兴登堡研究公司对阿达尼集团指控的调查，包括是否存在未披露与关联方交易以及违法操纵股票价格的情况。4、美司法部：特朗普应为国会山暴乱事件承担责任当地时间3月2日，美国司法部表示，前总统特朗普应当为2021年1月6日发生的国会山暴乱事件承担责任。司法部民事部门的律师表示：“就公众关心的问题发表演讲是总统的一项传统职能，但传统的功能是公共传播，它不包括煽动迫在眉睫的私人暴力。”俄乌局势1、美官员：美政府将宣布价值4亿美元对乌援助两名美方官员和一名知情人士当地时间3月2日向路透社透露，美政府将于当地时间3日宣布对乌克兰军队价值4亿美元的物资援助。2、俄副外长：俄美双方围绕《新削减战略武器条约》进行了务实对话俄罗斯外交部副部长里亚布科夫3月2日表示，在日内瓦裁军谈判会议期间，俄美双方进行了接触，围绕《新削减战略武器条约》进行了讨论。里亚布科夫称，双方对话是务实的。3、俄罗斯外长呼吁对“北溪”被炸进行快速公正的调查据俄罗斯媒体报道，俄罗斯外长拉夫罗夫3月2日呼吁对去年9月“北溪”天然气管道被炸事件进行“快速公正”的调查，并表示俄罗斯应参与相关调查。拉夫罗夫还指责西方在“无耻地破坏”黑海港口农产品外运协议。他说，俄方曾多次对协议涉及俄罗斯的部分内容落实状况表达不满，指出俄方谷物和化肥出口仍因西方限制遭遇阻滞。公司新闻1、苹果拒绝一款邮件应用更新ChatGPT功能据媒体周四报道，出于对人工智能潜在危害的担忧，苹果公司最新阻止了一款电子邮件应用程序的更新。这款应用程序名为BlueMail，该应用程序试图增加AI功能，使用ChatGPT来帮助用户自动编写邮件。苹果的应用程序审查小组上周在给Blix的邮件中指出，BlueMail包含AI生成的内容，但目前似乎并没有进行过内容过滤，可能会产生不适合于所有受众的内容(语言攻击和性内容等)，建议BlueMail将用户限制在17岁及以上，或者添加内容过滤功能。2、依靠币圈起家的Silvergate银行暴雷后重挫逾50%以向加密货币行业提供服务声名鹊起的Silvergate银行周四收跌57.72%。消息面上，公司公告称无法在3月16日的期限之前向SEC提交10-K年报。同时警告可能存在资本金不足的问题，正在评估一系列后续事件对公司持续经营能力的影响。消息公布后，包括美国最大美国最大加密货币交易所Coinbase、稳定币发行机构Paxos、币圈金融服务公司Galaxy Digital、芝商所旗下Cboe Digital、Bitstamp交易所均宣布停止与Silvergate的银行业务往来。3、欧盟据称将放行微软暴雪收购案据媒体周四援引消息人士报道，微软通过向竞争对手提供授权协议，有望解决欧盟对其收购动视暴雪的反垄断担忧。知情人士称，欧盟委员会计划在当地时间4月25日之前对这笔交易做出决定，预计不会要求微软出售资产来获得批准。4、福特汽车计划3月13日重启F-150 Lightning纯电动皮卡的生产福特汽车计划在3月13日重启F-150 Lightning纯电动皮卡的生产，此前因调查汽车电池起火问题停产。该汽车制造商周四表示，这个安排将使电池供应商SK On有充足时间重新开始生产并交付电动皮卡的电池组。5、云计算巨头Salesforce业绩超预期 股价大涨11%周三盘后，道指成分股、美国云计算巨头Salesforce披露截至今年1月底的2023财年四季度财报。营收83.8亿美元，同比增长14%，调整后每股收益1.68美元，均好于市场预期。公司预计2024财年收入345-347亿美元，好于分析师预期的340.5亿美元，同时宣布将回购计划扩大至200亿美元。受此影响，Salesforce周四收涨11.50%。","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"161121":0.9,"DJX":0.9,"YMmain":0.9,".DJI":0.9,"TSLA":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2927,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9940815876,"gmtCreate":1677808346895,"gmtModify":1677808351777,"author":{"id":"3576892531232178","authorId":"3576892531232178","name":"uiv","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/522ae5f11b7bc763293c30c3a20671c9","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576892531232178","authorIdStr":"3576892531232178"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👌🏻","listText":"👌🏻","text":"👌🏻","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9940815876","repostId":"1164319050","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1164319050","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1677804063,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1164319050?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2023-03-03 08:41","market":"sh","language":"zh","title":"Gates: I don't think the U.S. will ever succeed in preventing China from having powerful chips","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1164319050","media":"华尔街见闻","summary":"盖茨认为，美国限制中国技术发展的努力注定要失败，美国的做法只会“迫使”中国花时间和金钱来制造自己的芯片，“美国永远无法成功阻止中国拥有强大的芯片”。英国《金融时报》3月2日刊出该媒体播客节目《拉赫曼说","content":"<p><html><head></head><body>According to Gates, US efforts to restrict China's technological development are doomed to fail, and the US approach will only \"force\" China to spend time and money to make its own chips, and \"the US will never succeed in preventing China from having powerful chips\". On March 2, the Financial Times published the media's podcast \"Rahman Speaks\" to the United States<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSFT\">Microsoft</a>An interview with Bill Gates, the company's founder, on topics such as the Russia-Ukraine conflict, climate issues, technology and China-US tensions.</p><p>In an interview, Mr. Rahman, the show's host, said Bill Gates mentioned why he believed U.S. efforts to limit China's technological development were doomed to failure,<b>Gates believes that the US approach will only \"force\" China to spend time and money to make its own chips, and that \"the US will never succeed in preventing China from having powerful chips\".</b></p><p>Gideon Rahman, the show's host, said in the opening section, \"I met Gates at the Munich Security Conference a few weeks ago, and our topics were very broad, from climate issues to the UN Sustainable Development Goals…Gates also explained why he believes the ambition to limit global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius is impossible now, but why we shouldn't lose hope about it either, and why he believes the U.S. effort to limit China's technological development is doomed to fail.\"</p><p>According to this interview article, the topic content starts with the Ukraine crisis and ends with the China topic.</p><p>In the final part of the interview, Rahman mentioned: \"Last question, I really want to get your perspective because I know you are an internationalist and you believe that technology can change the world. So I remember ten years ago when I had lunch with you and the Financial Times [staff] and you told me, you know, to be positive about the rise of China, the technology that China can create, etc. Now you look at the world, let's look at the sentiment in the United States, they're trying to stop China's technological progress. What do you think about all this? The world is not going the way you want it to.”</p><p><b>\"Well, I don't think the U.S. can ever succeed in stopping China from having powerful chips.\" Gates replied, \"You know, we're going to force them to spend time and a lot of money making their own chips\", \"You know, I wish the U.S. and China would get along better. We [relationships] seem to be in a deteriorating trend when we have things that can be win-win between all countries in health, innovation, climate innovation, etc, but the most important relationship in the world is the U.S. -China relationship. I'm disappointed and concerned about how the relationship has evolved over the last few years.\"</b></p><p>Rahman then asked him whether he thought the U.S. effort [to hamper China's technological progress] was unlikely to succeed? Gates replied, \"I don't even understand what this success defines for us-whether it is to ensure that there are fewer jobs in our chip industry, oversupply in the chip industry, or to make Taiwan more attractive. It's complicated.\"</p><p>Rahman went on to say, \"Yes, I think they're going to say, we're trying to stay ahead of China. They say China is a military threat, these things have military uses, and we have to keep them down.\"</p><p>Gates then said, \"So if you really think there's going to be a war in the next decade, then you shouldn't have warned them in advance that you're going to cut off their chips (supply).\"</p><p>Rachman continued to ask, to the U.S. technology industry, to the U.S. technology industry, to<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSFT\">Microsoft</a>Will it make their survival harder for Google, regardless of who?</p><p>Gates said,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSFT\">Microsoft</a>Sales in China are not high, but there are some intelligent Chinese people working at Microsoft, so letting these Chinese people contribute in these areas, whether they end up leaving China or staying in China, will bring huge labor benefits to the world in health and software. So anything that gets in the way of that will slow it down.</p><p></body></html></p>","source":"wallstreetcn_api","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Gates: I don't think the U.S. will ever succeed in preventing China from having powerful chips</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nGates: I don't think the U.S. will ever succeed in preventing China from having powerful chips\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">华尔街见闻</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2023-03-03 08:41</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><html><head></head><body>According to Gates, US efforts to restrict China's technological development are doomed to fail, and the US approach will only \"force\" China to spend time and money to make its own chips, and \"the US will never succeed in preventing China from having powerful chips\". On March 2, the Financial Times published the media's podcast \"Rahman Speaks\" to the United States<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSFT\">Microsoft</a>An interview with Bill Gates, the company's founder, on topics such as the Russia-Ukraine conflict, climate issues, technology and China-US tensions.</p><p>In an interview, Mr. Rahman, the show's host, said Bill Gates mentioned why he believed U.S. efforts to limit China's technological development were doomed to failure,<b>Gates believes that the US approach will only \"force\" China to spend time and money to make its own chips, and that \"the US will never succeed in preventing China from having powerful chips\".</b></p><p>Gideon Rahman, the show's host, said in the opening section, \"I met Gates at the Munich Security Conference a few weeks ago, and our topics were very broad, from climate issues to the UN Sustainable Development Goals…Gates also explained why he believes the ambition to limit global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius is impossible now, but why we shouldn't lose hope about it either, and why he believes the U.S. effort to limit China's technological development is doomed to fail.\"</p><p>According to this interview article, the topic content starts with the Ukraine crisis and ends with the China topic.</p><p>In the final part of the interview, Rahman mentioned: \"Last question, I really want to get your perspective because I know you are an internationalist and you believe that technology can change the world. So I remember ten years ago when I had lunch with you and the Financial Times [staff] and you told me, you know, to be positive about the rise of China, the technology that China can create, etc. Now you look at the world, let's look at the sentiment in the United States, they're trying to stop China's technological progress. What do you think about all this? The world is not going the way you want it to.”</p><p><b>\"Well, I don't think the U.S. can ever succeed in stopping China from having powerful chips.\" Gates replied, \"You know, we're going to force them to spend time and a lot of money making their own chips\", \"You know, I wish the U.S. and China would get along better. We [relationships] seem to be in a deteriorating trend when we have things that can be win-win between all countries in health, innovation, climate innovation, etc, but the most important relationship in the world is the U.S. -China relationship. I'm disappointed and concerned about how the relationship has evolved over the last few years.\"</b></p><p>Rahman then asked him whether he thought the U.S. effort [to hamper China's technological progress] was unlikely to succeed? Gates replied, \"I don't even understand what this success defines for us-whether it is to ensure that there are fewer jobs in our chip industry, oversupply in the chip industry, or to make Taiwan more attractive. It's complicated.\"</p><p>Rahman went on to say, \"Yes, I think they're going to say, we're trying to stay ahead of China. They say China is a military threat, these things have military uses, and we have to keep them down.\"</p><p>Gates then said, \"So if you really think there's going to be a war in the next decade, then you shouldn't have warned them in advance that you're going to cut off their chips (supply).\"</p><p>Rachman continued to ask, to the U.S. technology industry, to the U.S. technology industry, to<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSFT\">Microsoft</a>Will it make their survival harder for Google, regardless of who?</p><p>Gates said,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSFT\">Microsoft</a>Sales in China are not high, but there are some intelligent Chinese people working at Microsoft, so letting these Chinese people contribute in these areas, whether they end up leaving China or staying in China, will bring huge labor benefits to the world in health and software. So anything that gets in the way of that will slow it down.</p><p></body></html></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> source：<a href=\"https://wallstreetcn.com/articles/3683211\">华尔街见闻</a></p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a9e6cb1a33dd64f159118795f199c2f3","relate_stocks":{"159813":"芯片","MSFT":"微软"},"source_url":"https://wallstreetcn.com/articles/3683211","is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1164319050","content_text":"盖茨认为，美国限制中国技术发展的努力注定要失败，美国的做法只会“迫使”中国花时间和金钱来制造自己的芯片，“美国永远无法成功阻止中国拥有强大的芯片”。英国《金融时报》3月2日刊出该媒体播客节目《拉赫曼说事》对美国微软公司创始人比尔·盖茨的采访，内容谈及俄乌冲突、气候问题、技术和中美紧张局势等多个话题。节目主持人拉赫曼在采访文章中称，比尔·盖茨在谈及美中关系时提到了为什么他认为美国限制中国技术发展的努力注定要失败，盖茨认为，美国的做法只会“迫使”中国花时间和金钱来制造自己的芯片，“美国永远无法成功阻止中国拥有强大的芯片”。该节目主持人吉迪恩·拉赫曼在开篇部分说道，“几周前，我在慕尼黑安全会议上见到了盖茨，我们的话题非常广泛，从气候问题到联合国可持续发展目标……盖茨还解释了为什么他认为将全球升温幅度控制在1.5摄氏度以内的雄心现在是不可能实现的，但为什么我们也不应该对此失去希望，以及为什么他认为美国限制中国技术发展的努力注定要失败。”根据这篇采访文章，话题内容以乌克兰危机开始，以中国话题结束。在采访最后部分，拉赫曼提到：“最后一个问题，我真的很想了解一下你的观点，因为我知道你是一位国际主义者，你相信技术能够改变世界。所以我记得十年前，我和你和《金融时报》（工作人员）一起共进午餐时你告诉我，你知道，要对中国的崛起、中国能创造的技术等持积极态度。现在你看看这个世界，让我们看看美国的情绪，他们正在努力阻止中国的技术进步。你对这一切有什么看法？这世界没有按照你想要的方式发展。”“好吧，我认为美国永远无法成功阻止中国拥有强大的芯片。”盖茨回答说，“你知道，我们会迫使他们花时间和大量金钱来制造他们自己的芯片”，“你知道，我希望美国和中国能更好地相处。当我们拥有在健康、创新、气候创新等所有国家之间都可以实现双赢的事物时，我们（之间的关系）似乎处于一种恶化的趋势，但世界上最重要的关系是美中关系。我对两国关系在过去几年里的关系演变感到失望和担忧。”拉赫曼接着提问他，是否认为美国（在阻碍中国技术进步上）的努力不太可能成功？盖茨回答称，“我甚至不明白这种成功对我们而言的定义是什么——是确保我们芯片行业的就业机会减少，芯片行业的供应过剩，还是让台湾更具吸引力。这很复杂。”拉赫曼接着表示，“是的，我想他们会说，我们正努力保持领先于中国。他们说中国在军事上构成威胁，这些东西有军事用途，我们必须压制住他们。”盖茨随后表示，“所以如果你真的认为未来十年会有一场战争，那么你就不应该提前警告他们说，你会切断他们的芯片（供应）。”拉赫曼继续提问道，对美国的科技行业，对微软，对谷歌，不管对谁而言，这会让他们的生存更困难吗？盖茨表示，微软在中国的销售额并不高，但有一些聪慧的中国人在微软工作，因此让这些中国人在这些领域做出贡献，无论他们最后离开中国还是留在中国，都将给世界在健康和软件领域带来巨大的劳动力效益。所以任何阻碍这方面的东西都会减慢速度。","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"159813":0.9,"MSFT":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3621,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9940815180,"gmtCreate":1677808322340,"gmtModify":1677808326294,"author":{"id":"3576892531232178","authorId":"3576892531232178","name":"uiv","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/522ae5f11b7bc763293c30c3a20671c9","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576892531232178","authorIdStr":"3576892531232178"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👌🏻","listText":"👌🏻","text":"👌🏻","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9940815180","repostId":"1172424644","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1172424644","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"为用户提供金融资讯、行情、数据，旨在帮助投资者理解世界，做投资决策。","home_visible":1,"media_name":"老虎资讯综合","id":"102","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1677806430,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1172424644?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2023-03-03 09:20","market":"sh","language":"zh","title":"Hong Kong stocks open | Hang Seng Index opens 1.34% higher, Bilibili rises more than 10% after results","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1172424644","media":"老虎资讯综合","summary":"3月3日讯，隔夜美股集体收涨，中概指数强势。港股高开明显，恒指涨1.34%，国指涨1.61%，恒生科技指数涨2.58%。盘面上，回港中概股大涨，哔哩哔哩绩后涨10%，百度涨4.5%，小鹏汽车、京东、万","content":"<p><html><head></head><body>On March 3rd, U.S. stocks closed up collectively overnight, and the China Concept Index was strong. Hong Kong stocks opened significantly higher, with the Hang Seng Index rising 1.34%, the State Index rising 1.61% and the Hang Seng Technology Index rising 2.58%.</p><p>On the disk, the stocks returning to Hong Kong rose sharply,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/09626\">Bilibili</a>After the results rose by 10%,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/09888\">Baidu</a>Up 4.5%,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/09868\">XPeng Motors</a>、<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/09618\">Jingdong</a>、<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GDS\">GDS</a>rose by more than 3%,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/09988\">Alibaba</a>、<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/09999\">Netease</a>And so on all rising; The first photovoltaic project REITs were approved, and photovoltaic stocks strengthened; Auto stocks that led the decline yesterday collectively rebounded, with biotechnology stocks, sporting goods stocks, gambling stocks, gas stocks,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">Apple</a>Concept stocks rose. On the other hand, pharmaceutical stocks, aviation stocks, and three concept stocks partially fell.<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/600332\">Baiyun Mountain</a>down 1.25%.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/eb9e5ba404831065697f405c67cefd64\" tg-width=\"840\" tg-height=\"470\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p></body></html></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Hong Kong stocks open | Hang Seng Index opens 1.34% higher, Bilibili rises more than 10% after results</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHong Kong stocks open | Hang Seng Index opens 1.34% higher, Bilibili rises more than 10% after results\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/102\">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">老虎资讯综合 </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2023-03-03 09:20</p>\n</div>\n</a>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><html><head></head><body>On March 3rd, U.S. stocks closed up collectively overnight, and the China Concept Index was strong. Hong Kong stocks opened significantly higher, with the Hang Seng Index rising 1.34%, the State Index rising 1.61% and the Hang Seng Technology Index rising 2.58%.</p><p>On the disk, the stocks returning to Hong Kong rose sharply,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/09626\">Bilibili</a>After the results rose by 10%,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/09888\">Baidu</a>Up 4.5%,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/09868\">XPeng Motors</a>、<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/09618\">Jingdong</a>、<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GDS\">GDS</a>rose by more than 3%,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/09988\">Alibaba</a>、<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/09999\">Netease</a>And so on all rising; The first photovoltaic project REITs were approved, and photovoltaic stocks strengthened; Auto stocks that led the decline yesterday collectively rebounded, with biotechnology stocks, sporting goods stocks, gambling stocks, gas stocks,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">Apple</a>Concept stocks rose. On the other hand, pharmaceutical stocks, aviation stocks, and three concept stocks partially fell.<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/600332\">Baiyun Mountain</a>down 1.25%.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/eb9e5ba404831065697f405c67cefd64\" tg-width=\"840\" tg-height=\"470\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p></body></html></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ff6e3231d788a5a6d28cf7965385cc7f","relate_stocks":{"513600":"恒生指数ETF南方","BK4510":"在线教育","SG9999003461.SGD":"United Asia Pacific Infrastructure SGD","BK1104":"互动家庭娱乐","BK1608":"元宇宙概念","BILI":"哔哩哔哩","BK4531":"中概回港概念","09626":"哔哩哔哩-W","IE0034224299.USD":"PINEBRIDGE ASIA EX JAPAN EQUITY \"A\" (USD) ACC","BK4503":"景林资产持仓","BK4513":"直播概念","BK4566":"资本集团","SG9999006597.SGD":"United China-India Dynamic Growth SGD","BK4505":"高瓴资本持仓","SG9999001069.SGD":"UOB UNITED ASIA PACIFIC GROWTH (SGD) ACC","HSI":"恒生指数","02833":"恒指ETF","BK4085":"互动家庭娱乐","BK4577":"网络游戏","BK4504":"桥水持仓","BK4588":"碎股","BK1588":"回港中概股"},"source_url":"","is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1172424644","content_text":"3月3日讯，隔夜美股集体收涨，中概指数强势。港股高开明显，恒指涨1.34%，国指涨1.61%，恒生科技指数涨2.58%。盘面上，回港中概股大涨，哔哩哔哩绩后涨10%，百度涨4.5%，小鹏汽车、京东、万国数据涨超3%，阿里巴巴、网易等皆上涨；首单光伏项目REITs获批，光伏股走强；昨日领衔下跌的汽车股集体反弹，生物科技股、体育用品股、濠赌股、燃气股、苹果概念股齐涨。另一方面，药品股、航空股、三台概念股部分下跌，白云山跌1.25%。","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"513600":0.9,"02833":0.9,"HSImain":0.9,"BILI":0.9,"09626":0.9,"MCHmain":0.9,"MHImain":0.9,"HSI":0.9,"HHImain":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2767,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9940815909,"gmtCreate":1677808283502,"gmtModify":1677808288191,"author":{"id":"3576892531232178","authorId":"3576892531232178","name":"uiv","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/522ae5f11b7bc763293c30c3a20671c9","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576892531232178","authorIdStr":"3576892531232178"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👌🏻","listText":"👌🏻","text":"👌🏻","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9940815909","repostId":"2316997759","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3164,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9940812778,"gmtCreate":1677808244395,"gmtModify":1677808248626,"author":{"id":"3576892531232178","authorId":"3576892531232178","name":"uiv","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/522ae5f11b7bc763293c30c3a20671c9","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576892531232178","authorIdStr":"3576892531232178"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👌🏻","listText":"👌🏻","text":"👌🏻","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9940812778","repostId":"2316419995","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2316419995","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1677806968,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2316419995?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2023-03-03 09:29","market":"sh","language":"zh","title":"Zhongtong Explosive Thunder? Short-selling institutions refer to fraudulent financial reports in the United States and at least 50% downside of stock prices","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2316419995","media":"华尔街见闻","summary":"做空机构Grizzly Research称，中通快递的利润率一度堪比苹果，在国家工商总局报告的利润率远低于在美报告水平，在美报低员工人数，压低人力成本，虚报资本支出，造成利润率超高假象，帮助其上市以来","content":"<p><html><head></head><body><b>According to Grizzly Research, a short-selling organization, the profit margin of ZTO Express was once comparable to that of Apple, and the profit margin reported by the State Administration for Industry and Commerce was far lower than that reported in the United States. In the United States, the number of employees was low, labor costs were lowered, and capital expenditures were falsely reported, resulting in the illusion of ultra-high profit margin, which helped it raise over $3 billion since its listing; ZTO also used undisclosed related parties to transfer operating expenses and used large loans to support insider real estate investment.</b>As popular Chinese stocks continue to rebound, Chinese logistics leaders<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ZTO\">ZTO Express</a>Exposed to financial fraud.</p><p>On Thursday, March 2nd, Eastern Time, Grizzly Research, a short-selling agency in the United States, released a report, believing that ZTO Express may have profits that are much higher than those of its peers only because of forging financial statement data. Considering Zhongtong's artificially exaggerated profit margin and the adoption of multiple valuation adjustment estimate, the report believes that Zhongtong's current trading price of U.S. stocks is much higher than its fair value, with at least 50% downside.</p><p><b>Profit margins more than double that of domestic peers Once comparable<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">Apple</a></b></p><p>The above-mentioned Grizzly Research report opens by saying that ZTO Express is the leader in the fiercely competitive Chinese logistics market. Although the whole industry has been standardized, ZTO's profit margin is more than twice the average level of its domestic peers-SF, YTO, Yunda and Shentong.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c5011a6a75b71073f0bce12769cd4f12\" tg-width=\"571\" tg-height=\"501\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>According to the report, the data shows that ZTO's profitability was once comparable to that of blue-chip companies with higher profit margins such as Apple. For a company to achieve such great results, it either has a great management team or is financially too good to be true. And Grizzly Research found through due diligence that ZTO deceived investors. The report reads:</p><p>We believe that ZTO's significantly higher profit margins are really just the result of possible falsification of financial statements. We believe that in order to fabricate these outstanding results, ZTO Communications understated its operating income and costs.</p><p><b>Low number of employees and lower labor costs, resulting in the illusion of high profit margins</b></p><p>Grizzly said its report highlighted hard evidence of inconsistencies with ultra-high profit margins, including ongoing financing, inconsistent accounting data and numerous conflicts of interest. In particular, it is mentioned that the data reported by ZTO in the State Administration for Industry and Commerce of China is completely different from the data submitted by the department to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).</p><p>The SAIC filing shows that ZTO's profit margin is actually comparable to its peers in the express delivery industry. Between 2019 and 2021, ZTO's net profit margin ranged from 6.3% to 10.6%, but the company reported a net profit margin of 15.5% to 25.7% in its financial statements filed with the SEC.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/43965d7078947f4b474d7a72f0928a29\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"419\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>The report points out that ZTO reports a large number of employees in China, but it is below that level in the United States. Because ZTO deliberately reports low numbers of employees, it can support its reported labor cost data, justifying ultra-high profit margins. With conservative salary estimates, ZTO's true headcount and associated labor costs could be more than double the numbers the division reported to the SEC.</p><p><b>Falsely reporting capital expenditures helped raise more than $3 billion since listing</b></p><p>In order to make the financial fraud seem reasonable, ZTO also misstated capital expenditures in its financial report to the SEC, according to the report. The division sought to justify the growth rate of its property, plant and equipment (PP&E) and land use rights exceeding revenue. But strategically, ZTO has no reason to hoard land.</p><p>Grizzly Research suspects that ZTO used its ultra-high profit margins to raise funds because false capital expenditure data could explain the high profits. So far, ZTO's approach seems to be working well. In 2016 at<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NYSE\">NYSE</a>Since its listing, ZTO has raised more than $3 billion, although the company's expenses show no tangible shareholder value.</p><p>False acquisitions expand insiders use undisclosed related parties to transfer operating expenses large loans for insiders real estate investment</p><p>According to the report, ZTO used some acquisitions in 2014 and 2015 to expand the number of insiders and, or to balance the company's accounts. ZTO bought franchisees it calls network partners from related parties at a price much higher than the start-up costs of those partners, company documents show. Worryingly, records in China show no change in ownership after the transaction. This may be because these entities already operate as ZTO subsidiaries. Grizzly Research wonders if ZTO spent its shareholders' money for nothing and made no return.</p><p>According to the report, ZTO has used an undisclosed network of related parties to transfer operating expenses out of the balance sheet. Several of ZTO's counterparties are personally owned and controlled by relatives and friends employed by ZTO, or its management team.</p><p>According to the report, Grizzly Research field trips uncovered more potential undisclosed related parties, those purportedly independent entities operating close to each other and also sharing logos.</p><p>Even ZTO's disclosed connected transactions are worrying. The report argues that because ZTO's large loans stem from the company's funding of insider's property investment, public shareholders are needlessly taking risks in China's real estate industry. The risk of defaulting on these individual projects falls on the investor, not the related party to whom the loan benefits.</p><p></body></html></p>","source":"wallstreetcn_api","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Zhongtong Explosive Thunder? Short-selling institutions refer to fraudulent financial reports in the United States and at least 50% downside of stock prices</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nZhongtong Explosive Thunder? Short-selling institutions refer to fraudulent financial reports in the United States and at least 50% downside of stock prices\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">华尔街见闻</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2023-03-03 09:29</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><html><head></head><body><b>According to Grizzly Research, a short-selling organization, the profit margin of ZTO Express was once comparable to that of Apple, and the profit margin reported by the State Administration for Industry and Commerce was far lower than that reported in the United States. In the United States, the number of employees was low, labor costs were lowered, and capital expenditures were falsely reported, resulting in the illusion of ultra-high profit margin, which helped it raise over $3 billion since its listing; ZTO also used undisclosed related parties to transfer operating expenses and used large loans to support insider real estate investment.</b>As popular Chinese stocks continue to rebound, Chinese logistics leaders<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ZTO\">ZTO Express</a>Exposed to financial fraud.</p><p>On Thursday, March 2nd, Eastern Time, Grizzly Research, a short-selling agency in the United States, released a report, believing that ZTO Express may have profits that are much higher than those of its peers only because of forging financial statement data. Considering Zhongtong's artificially exaggerated profit margin and the adoption of multiple valuation adjustment estimate, the report believes that Zhongtong's current trading price of U.S. stocks is much higher than its fair value, with at least 50% downside.</p><p><b>Profit margins more than double that of domestic peers Once comparable<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">Apple</a></b></p><p>The above-mentioned Grizzly Research report opens by saying that ZTO Express is the leader in the fiercely competitive Chinese logistics market. Although the whole industry has been standardized, ZTO's profit margin is more than twice the average level of its domestic peers-SF, YTO, Yunda and Shentong.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c5011a6a75b71073f0bce12769cd4f12\" tg-width=\"571\" tg-height=\"501\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>According to the report, the data shows that ZTO's profitability was once comparable to that of blue-chip companies with higher profit margins such as Apple. For a company to achieve such great results, it either has a great management team or is financially too good to be true. And Grizzly Research found through due diligence that ZTO deceived investors. The report reads:</p><p>We believe that ZTO's significantly higher profit margins are really just the result of possible falsification of financial statements. We believe that in order to fabricate these outstanding results, ZTO Communications understated its operating income and costs.</p><p><b>Low number of employees and lower labor costs, resulting in the illusion of high profit margins</b></p><p>Grizzly said its report highlighted hard evidence of inconsistencies with ultra-high profit margins, including ongoing financing, inconsistent accounting data and numerous conflicts of interest. In particular, it is mentioned that the data reported by ZTO in the State Administration for Industry and Commerce of China is completely different from the data submitted by the department to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).</p><p>The SAIC filing shows that ZTO's profit margin is actually comparable to its peers in the express delivery industry. Between 2019 and 2021, ZTO's net profit margin ranged from 6.3% to 10.6%, but the company reported a net profit margin of 15.5% to 25.7% in its financial statements filed with the SEC.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/43965d7078947f4b474d7a72f0928a29\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"419\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>The report points out that ZTO reports a large number of employees in China, but it is below that level in the United States. Because ZTO deliberately reports low numbers of employees, it can support its reported labor cost data, justifying ultra-high profit margins. With conservative salary estimates, ZTO's true headcount and associated labor costs could be more than double the numbers the division reported to the SEC.</p><p><b>Falsely reporting capital expenditures helped raise more than $3 billion since listing</b></p><p>In order to make the financial fraud seem reasonable, ZTO also misstated capital expenditures in its financial report to the SEC, according to the report. The division sought to justify the growth rate of its property, plant and equipment (PP&E) and land use rights exceeding revenue. But strategically, ZTO has no reason to hoard land.</p><p>Grizzly Research suspects that ZTO used its ultra-high profit margins to raise funds because false capital expenditure data could explain the high profits. So far, ZTO's approach seems to be working well. In 2016 at<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NYSE\">NYSE</a>Since its listing, ZTO has raised more than $3 billion, although the company's expenses show no tangible shareholder value.</p><p>False acquisitions expand insiders use undisclosed related parties to transfer operating expenses large loans for insiders real estate investment</p><p>According to the report, ZTO used some acquisitions in 2014 and 2015 to expand the number of insiders and, or to balance the company's accounts. ZTO bought franchisees it calls network partners from related parties at a price much higher than the start-up costs of those partners, company documents show. Worryingly, records in China show no change in ownership after the transaction. This may be because these entities already operate as ZTO subsidiaries. Grizzly Research wonders if ZTO spent its shareholders' money for nothing and made no return.</p><p>According to the report, ZTO has used an undisclosed network of related parties to transfer operating expenses out of the balance sheet. Several of ZTO's counterparties are personally owned and controlled by relatives and friends employed by ZTO, or its management team.</p><p>According to the report, Grizzly Research field trips uncovered more potential undisclosed related parties, those purportedly independent entities operating close to each other and also sharing logos.</p><p>Even ZTO's disclosed connected transactions are worrying. The report argues that because ZTO's large loans stem from the company's funding of insider's property investment, public shareholders are needlessly taking risks in China's real estate industry. The risk of defaulting on these individual projects falls on the investor, not the related party to whom the loan benefits.</p><p></body></html></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> source：<a href=\"https://wallstreetcn.com/articles/3683191\">华尔街见闻</a></p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/659e9f729bba48dc59353a363b665949","relate_stocks":{"ZTO":"中通快递"},"source_url":"https://wallstreetcn.com/articles/3683191","is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2316419995","content_text":"做空机构Grizzly Research称，中通快递的利润率一度堪比苹果，在国家工商总局报告的利润率远低于在美报告水平，在美报低员工人数，压低人力成本，虚报资本支出，造成利润率超高假象，帮助其上市以来募资超30亿美元；中通还利用未披露关联方转移运营费用，将大笔贷款用于支持内部人房产投资。热门中概股持续反弹之际，中概物流龙头中通快递被曝财务造假。美东时间3月2日周四，美国卖空机构Grizzly Research发布报告，认为中通快递可能只是因为伪造财务报表数据，才有表面看来远高于同行的利润。考虑到中通人为夸大的利润率，并采用倍数估值调整估算，报告认为，中通目前的美股交易价远高于公允价值，至少有50%的下行空间。利润率是国内同行两倍多 一度堪比苹果上述Grizzly Research报告开篇称，在竞争激烈的中国物流市场中，中通快递是领头羊，虽然整个行业都已标准化，但中通的利润率却是国内同行――顺丰、圆通、韵达和申通平均水平的两倍多。报告称，数据显示，中通的盈利能力一度和苹果这种利润率较高的蓝筹公司相当。一家公司能有如此出色的成绩，要么拥有出色的管理团队，要么财务状况好得令人难以置信。而Grizzly Research通过尽职调查发现，中通欺骗了投资者。报告写道：我们认为，中通明显较高的利润率实际上只是可能伪造财务报表的结果。我们相信，为了编造这些出色的成绩，中通通讯低报了营业收入和成本。报低员工人数 压低人力成本 造成利润率超高假象Grizzly称，其报告突出了和超高利润率不符的确凿证据，包括持续的融资、财会数据不一致以及众多利益冲突。其中特别提到，中通在中国国家工商总局的报告数据和该司递交美国证监会（SEC）的数据截然不同。工商总局的备案文件显示，中通的利润率实际上与快递业的同行相当，2019年至2021年间，中通的净利润率在6.3%到10.6%，但该公司在递交SEC的财务报表中报告，净利润率为15.5%到25.7%。报告指出，中通在中国报告的员工人数庞大，在美国却低于这一水平。因为中通故意报低员工人数，就可以支持其报告的劳动力成本数据，证明超高的利润率合理。以保守的薪资估计，中通的真实员工人数和相关人工费用可能比该司向SEC报告的数字高出一倍以上。虚报资本支出 帮助上市以来募资超30亿美元报告认为，为了让财务欺诈看似合理，中通还在递交SEC的财报中虚报了资本支出，该司企图证明，其物业、厂房和设备（PP&E）以及土地使用权的增长速度超过收入是合理的。但从战略上看，中通没有理由囤积土地。Grizzly Research怀疑，中通利用其超高的利润率募集资金，因为虚假的资本支出数据可以解释为何利润高。迄今为止，中通的这种做法似乎很有效。2016年在纽交所上市以来，中通已经募资超过30亿美元，尽管公司支出没有显示有形的股东价值。虚假收购扩充内部人 利用未披露关联方转移运营费用 大笔贷款用于内部人房产投资报告称，中通利用2014年和2015年的一些收购扩大了内部人的数量，并且、或者让公司的账目平衡。公司文件显示，中通从关联方收购了被其称为网络合作伙伴的特许经营商，收购价远高于这些合作伙伴的启动成本。令人担忧的是，在中国的记录显示，交易后，所有权没有发生变化。这可能是因为这些实体已经作为中通子公司运营。Grizzly Research怀疑，中通是否白白花了股东的钱，没有取得任何回报。报告认为，中通已利用未披露的关联方网络将运营费用转出资产负债表。中通的几个交易对手由受雇于中通、或其管理团队的亲友个人所有和控制。报告称，Grizzly Research实地考察发现了更多潜在的未披露关联方，那些据称独立的实体彼此运营距离很近，还共享logo。就连中通已披露的关联交易也令人担忧。报告认为，因为中通的大笔贷款源于公司为内部人士的房产投资提供资金，公众股东不必要地承担了中国房地产行业风险。这些个人项目违约的风险落在了投资者身上，而不是贷款受益的关联方。","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"ZTO":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2921,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9957795405,"gmtCreate":1677543301707,"gmtModify":1677543305584,"author":{"id":"3576892531232178","authorId":"3576892531232178","name":"uiv","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/522ae5f11b7bc763293c30c3a20671c9","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576892531232178","authorIdStr":"3576892531232178"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👌🏻👌🏻","listText":"👌🏻👌🏻","text":"👌🏻👌🏻","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9957795405","repostId":"1139109642","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1139109642","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"为用户提供金融资讯、行情、数据，旨在帮助投资者理解世界，做投资决策。","home_visible":1,"media_name":"老虎资讯综合","id":"102","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1677542520,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1139109642?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2023-02-28 08:02","market":"us","language":"zh","title":"Last night and this morning | U.S. bond yields fell, and U.S. stocks rose! Musk returns to the world's richest man","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1139109642","media":"老虎资讯综合","summary":"摘要：①美债收益率回落提振美股，纳指收涨0.63%，特斯拉涨超5%马斯克重夺世界首富头衔；②英欧就北爱贸易争端达成关键协议；③美国财长耶伦访问乌克兰。海外行情1、美股收涨纳指涨0.63%特斯拉涨超5%","content":"<p><html><head></head><body>Abstract: ① The drop in U.S. bond yield boosted U.S. stocks, and the Nasdaq closed up 0.63%.<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">Tesla</a>Over 5%, Musk regained the title of world's richest man; ② Britain and Europe reached a key agreement on the Northern Ireland trade dispute; ③ U.S. Treasury Secretary Yellen visits Ukraine.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7ce49cfea03c1e22a55af842c19c9f5a\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"1920\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>Overseas Quotes</p><p>1. U.S. stocks closed higher, Nasdaq rose 0.63%, Tesla rose more than 5%, Musk regained the title of world's richest man</p><p>U.S. stocks closed higher on Monday. The decline in U.S. bond yields boosted the stock index. The orders of durable consumer goods and manufacturing data released on Monday continued the continuous beating of expectations of U.S. economic data. Investors continue to monitor the state of inflation in the United States and its impact on the Federal Reserve's policy outlook. By the close, the Nasdaq was up 0.63%, the S&P 500 was up 0.31% and the Dow Jones was up 0.22%.</p><p>Tesla rose more than 5%, and its stock price rose more than 100% from its Jan. 6 low. According to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index, Musk's net worth once again reached $187.1 billion, regaining the title of the world's richest man. Most big tech stocks rose, Netflix rose more than 1%,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">Apple</a>、<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMZN\">Amazon</a>、<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GOOG\">Google</a>、<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSFT\">Microsoft</a>Small gains; Facebook fell slightly. Fisker closed up 30%, its biggest one-day gain in recent two years.</p><p>2. Popular Chinese concept stocks rose generally<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BIDU\">Baidu</a>Up more than 5%</p><p>Popular Chinese stocks rose generally, and the Nasdaq China Golden Dragon Index rose 1.33%.<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/VIPS\">Vipshop</a>It rose more than 7%, Baidu rose more than 5%,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/IQ\">iQIYI</a>rose by more than 4%,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PDD\">Pinduoduo</a>、<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/XPEV\">XPeng Motors</a>rose by more than 2%,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NTES\">Netease</a>、<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/WB\">Weibo</a>、<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BABA\">Alibaba</a>、<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LI\">Li Auto</a>、<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NIO\">Nio</a>Small upside.<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BILI\">Bilibili</a>It fell by more than 2%,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/JD\">Jingdong</a>Down slightly.</p><p>3. Major European stock indexes closed higher across the board, and Germany's DAX30 index rose 1.13%</p><p>The main European stock indexes closed higher across the board on Monday, with Germany's DAX30 index rising 1.13% and France's CAC40 index rising 1.51%.<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/VUKE.UK\">FTSE 100 UK</a>The index rose 0.72%, and the Euro Stoxx 50 index rose 1.66%.</p><p>4. Oil prices fell nearly 2% in intraday sessions, giving up last Friday's gains, and US gas rose more than 7% to a new high in the month</p><p>Concerns about recession and oil demand prevailed, and oil prices stopped rising for two consecutive days. WTI April crude oil futures closed down $0.64, or 0.84%, at $75.68/barrel. Brent April crude oil futures closed down $0.71, or 0.85%, at $82.45/barrel.</p><p>Dutch TTF natural gas futures, the European benchmark, fell by more than 7% in late trading, fell by more than 8% in intraday trading and fell below the integer of 50 euros/MWh, setting a new one-and-a-half-year low since August 2021. ICE British Gas also fell more than 7%, falling below 120p/kcal. U.S. NYMEX April natural gas futures rose by more than 7% to $2.7310/million British thermal units, the highest in the month since February 1st.</p><p>5. On Monday, the price of gold futures in New York closed 0.4% higher, ending a five-game losing streak</p><p>Gold futures for April delivery rose $7.80, or 0.4%, to close at $1,824.90 an ounce on the New York Mercantile Exchange after falling for five consecutive sessions.</p><p>Macro News</p><p>1. Unexpected plunge! US durable goods orders record biggest sequential decline in 32 months</p><p>On Monday (February 27th), before the U.S. stock market opened, the first U.S. economic data of this week-the orders for durable goods released by the Commerce Department recorded the biggest decline in more than 30 months.</p><p>Specific data shows that seasonally adjusted durable goods orders in the United States recorded $272.3 billion in January, down 4.5% from December 2022, the largest month-on-month decline since April 2020. The data rose 5.1% month-on-month in December, and the market had expected to fall 4%.</p><p>2. European Central Bank President Lagarde believes that it is \"good reason\" to rate hike another 50 basis points in March</p><p>European Central Bank President Christine Lagarde said there is a good chance that the ECB will advance the intention of rate hike 50 basis points at next month's meeting. \"There is good reason to believe that we will rate hike another 50 basis points in March,\" Lagarde said in the interview. \"Later, we will observe further. We will depend on the data.\"</p><p>3. UK and EU reach key agreement on Northern Ireland trade dispute</p><p>On Monday, local time, British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak announced that his country and the European Union had signed a new \"Windsor Framework\" agreement, which is expected to end years of repeated tugging between the two sides on Northern Ireland's trade issue.</p><p>On the most critical customs issue, a \"red\" and \"green\" channel system will be set up between the UK mainland and Northern Ireland: goods shipped from other parts of the UK to Northern Ireland for sale will pass through the \"green channel\" and will not be subject to routine inspection, while goods exported from the UK to Ireland, a member state of the EU, via Northern Ireland will need to be inspected through the \"red channel\".</p><p>4. The U.S. House of Representatives seeks to ban the Federal Reserve from issuing digital currencies</p><p>A top Republican member of the U.S. House of Representatives has introduced a law bill seeking to ban the Federal Reserve from issuing digital dollars, saying there is a risk of \"developing a dangerous surveillance tool\" to monitor Americans' financial transactions. The bill proposed by Majority Whip Tom Emmer also calls for the Fed to submit quarterly reports to Congress on findings and decisions of research or pilot projects related to central bank digital currencies (CBDCs). The Fed is evaluating the possibility of issuing U.S. CBDCs, but has yet to decide whether to move forward.</p><p>Situation between Russia and Ukraine</p><p>1. US Treasury Secretary Yellen visits Ukraine</p><p>U.S. Treasury Secretary Yellen arrived in Kyiv, the capital of Ukraine, for a visit on February 27th, local time. Yellen announced the handover of the first $1.25 billion in aid to Ukraine from the latest U.S. aid budget of $9.9 billion. It is reported that Yellen met with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and other key government officials.</p><p>2. The energy war continues! Russia halts oil deliveries to Poland</p><p>adviser to the president and press secretary of the state oil pipeline transportation company (Transneft), Russian media reported Monday<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/002922\">Igor</a>· Jemin said that the company should have transported Russian oil to the Polish refinery at the end of February, but the relevant parties did not pay the transit fee, so the oil supply to Poland was excluded from the export plan approved by the Russian Ministry of Energy, and the Russian Pipeline Oil Transportation Company has not supplied oil to the country at present.</p><p>3. Russia claims to strike Ukrainian targets in multiple directions, and Ukraine claims to shoot down Russian fighters</p><p>The Russian Ministry of Defense reported on February 27th local time that the Russian army attacked Ukrainian personnel, tanks, armored vehicles and military vehicles in Kupyansk, Bonliman, Donetsk, Zaporizhzhia and Kherson. Russian air defense forces shot down four American-made \"Haimas\" rockets and five Ukrainian drones. The Ukrainian News Agency reported on February 27th local time that the General Staff of the Ukrainian Armed Forces said that in the past 24 hours, the Ukrainian army had repelled 81 attacks by the Russian army in multiple directions. The Ukrainian Air Force carried out four strikes on the concentration area of Russian personnel and military equipment, and shot down a Russian Su-25 fighter. Ukrainian missile units and artillery units attacked targets such as Russian ammunition depots and communication jamming stations.</p><p>Company News</p><p>1. American social platform Snapchat launches ChatGPT-like functions</p><p>On Monday, local time, Snapchat, a social application for pictures and short videos in the United States, announced that the company would launch a chat based on Open AI's latest GPT technology<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/300024\">Robot</a>My AI, will be available to paid subscription users first. In response to the known problems of ChatGPT at present, the company has also adjusted the behavior of the robot, prevented it from making outrageous remarks, and banned functions such as writing academic papers. At the close, Snapchat was up 0.71%.</p><p>2、<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/QCOM\">Qualcomm</a>Apple's 5G chip is coming soon, CEO said himself</p><p>Qualcomm CEO Cristiano Amon revealed in an interview on Monday that Qualcomm expects Apple to use self-developed communication chips in 2024, but they can continue to contact the company if they want to continue to use Qualcomm products. For Qualcomm, Apple's revenue contributed nearly $10 billion in the last fiscal year, accounting for about 22%.</p><p>Ming-Chi Kuo, a well-known technology industry analyst, also revealed on Monday that Apple has recently restarted the iPhone SE 4 project and will use self-developed 5G chips. It remains to be seen whether the higher-end iPhone 16 series uses self-developed communication chips. If it goes well on SE 4, Apple will also switch to self-developed communication chips in iPad and Apple Watch product lines.</p><p>3. Meta announced the creation of a top product team to develop generative AI</p><p>Meta CEO Zuckerberg said Monday that the company is creating a top product team focused on rapidly advancing the company's achievements in the field of generative AI. Zuckerberg said the team's main job in the short term is to create creative and expressive tools. In the long run, companies will focus on developing AI roles that can help people in a variety of ways.</p><p>Last Friday, Meta released LLaMA, a large-scale language model of artificial intelligence, on its official website. However, at present, this product is only used for research and training, and it has not yet been put into the products of social media platforms.</p><p>4. \"Buffett loves stocks\"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/OXY\">Occidental Petroleum</a>Earnings Missed Expectations</p><p>After the bell on Monday, Occidental Petroleum disclosed its fourth-quarter financial data, which included adjusted earnings of $1.61 per share, compared with analysts' expectations of $1.79; Adjusted net income of $1.6 billion in the fourth quarter; In the fourth quarter, the pre-tax chemical profit was $457 million, compared with analysts' expectations of $454.4 million; Oil and gas profit before taxes in the fourth quarter was $2.50 billion, compared with analysts' expectations of $2.63 billion.</p><p>5. Ford Battery Supplier Says F-150 Lighting Electric Pickup Fire Is Rare Incident</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/F\">Ford Motor</a>SK On, the company's battery supplier, said Monday that the flaw that caused the F-150 Lightning electric pickup to catch fire and discontinue production earlier this month was not a fundamental flaw in the power supply design. SK On, an automotive battery subsidiary of South Korea's SK Innovation Co. Ltd, said in the statement: \"We believe this is a rare incident and not a fundamental problem with battery technology or our overall manufacturing system. SK On worked with Ford to identify the root cause of the problem and implement improvements in our processes to address the problem.\"</p><p></body></html></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Last night and this morning | U.S. bond yields fell, and U.S. stocks rose! Musk returns to the world's richest man</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nLast night and this morning | U.S. bond yields fell, and U.S. stocks rose! Musk returns to the world's richest man\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/102\">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">老虎资讯综合 </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2023-02-28 08:02</p>\n</div>\n</a>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><html><head></head><body>Abstract: ① The drop in U.S. bond yield boosted U.S. stocks, and the Nasdaq closed up 0.63%.<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">Tesla</a>Over 5%, Musk regained the title of world's richest man; ② Britain and Europe reached a key agreement on the Northern Ireland trade dispute; ③ U.S. Treasury Secretary Yellen visits Ukraine.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7ce49cfea03c1e22a55af842c19c9f5a\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"1920\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>Overseas Quotes</p><p>1. U.S. stocks closed higher, Nasdaq rose 0.63%, Tesla rose more than 5%, Musk regained the title of world's richest man</p><p>U.S. stocks closed higher on Monday. The decline in U.S. bond yields boosted the stock index. The orders of durable consumer goods and manufacturing data released on Monday continued the continuous beating of expectations of U.S. economic data. Investors continue to monitor the state of inflation in the United States and its impact on the Federal Reserve's policy outlook. By the close, the Nasdaq was up 0.63%, the S&P 500 was up 0.31% and the Dow Jones was up 0.22%.</p><p>Tesla rose more than 5%, and its stock price rose more than 100% from its Jan. 6 low. According to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index, Musk's net worth once again reached $187.1 billion, regaining the title of the world's richest man. Most big tech stocks rose, Netflix rose more than 1%,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">Apple</a>、<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMZN\">Amazon</a>、<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GOOG\">Google</a>、<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSFT\">Microsoft</a>Small gains; Facebook fell slightly. Fisker closed up 30%, its biggest one-day gain in recent two years.</p><p>2. Popular Chinese concept stocks rose generally<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BIDU\">Baidu</a>Up more than 5%</p><p>Popular Chinese stocks rose generally, and the Nasdaq China Golden Dragon Index rose 1.33%.<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/VIPS\">Vipshop</a>It rose more than 7%, Baidu rose more than 5%,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/IQ\">iQIYI</a>rose by more than 4%,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PDD\">Pinduoduo</a>、<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/XPEV\">XPeng Motors</a>rose by more than 2%,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NTES\">Netease</a>、<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/WB\">Weibo</a>、<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BABA\">Alibaba</a>、<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LI\">Li Auto</a>、<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NIO\">Nio</a>Small upside.<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BILI\">Bilibili</a>It fell by more than 2%,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/JD\">Jingdong</a>Down slightly.</p><p>3. Major European stock indexes closed higher across the board, and Germany's DAX30 index rose 1.13%</p><p>The main European stock indexes closed higher across the board on Monday, with Germany's DAX30 index rising 1.13% and France's CAC40 index rising 1.51%.<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/VUKE.UK\">FTSE 100 UK</a>The index rose 0.72%, and the Euro Stoxx 50 index rose 1.66%.</p><p>4. Oil prices fell nearly 2% in intraday sessions, giving up last Friday's gains, and US gas rose more than 7% to a new high in the month</p><p>Concerns about recession and oil demand prevailed, and oil prices stopped rising for two consecutive days. WTI April crude oil futures closed down $0.64, or 0.84%, at $75.68/barrel. Brent April crude oil futures closed down $0.71, or 0.85%, at $82.45/barrel.</p><p>Dutch TTF natural gas futures, the European benchmark, fell by more than 7% in late trading, fell by more than 8% in intraday trading and fell below the integer of 50 euros/MWh, setting a new one-and-a-half-year low since August 2021. ICE British Gas also fell more than 7%, falling below 120p/kcal. U.S. NYMEX April natural gas futures rose by more than 7% to $2.7310/million British thermal units, the highest in the month since February 1st.</p><p>5. On Monday, the price of gold futures in New York closed 0.4% higher, ending a five-game losing streak</p><p>Gold futures for April delivery rose $7.80, or 0.4%, to close at $1,824.90 an ounce on the New York Mercantile Exchange after falling for five consecutive sessions.</p><p>Macro News</p><p>1. Unexpected plunge! US durable goods orders record biggest sequential decline in 32 months</p><p>On Monday (February 27th), before the U.S. stock market opened, the first U.S. economic data of this week-the orders for durable goods released by the Commerce Department recorded the biggest decline in more than 30 months.</p><p>Specific data shows that seasonally adjusted durable goods orders in the United States recorded $272.3 billion in January, down 4.5% from December 2022, the largest month-on-month decline since April 2020. The data rose 5.1% month-on-month in December, and the market had expected to fall 4%.</p><p>2. European Central Bank President Lagarde believes that it is \"good reason\" to rate hike another 50 basis points in March</p><p>European Central Bank President Christine Lagarde said there is a good chance that the ECB will advance the intention of rate hike 50 basis points at next month's meeting. \"There is good reason to believe that we will rate hike another 50 basis points in March,\" Lagarde said in the interview. \"Later, we will observe further. We will depend on the data.\"</p><p>3. UK and EU reach key agreement on Northern Ireland trade dispute</p><p>On Monday, local time, British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak announced that his country and the European Union had signed a new \"Windsor Framework\" agreement, which is expected to end years of repeated tugging between the two sides on Northern Ireland's trade issue.</p><p>On the most critical customs issue, a \"red\" and \"green\" channel system will be set up between the UK mainland and Northern Ireland: goods shipped from other parts of the UK to Northern Ireland for sale will pass through the \"green channel\" and will not be subject to routine inspection, while goods exported from the UK to Ireland, a member state of the EU, via Northern Ireland will need to be inspected through the \"red channel\".</p><p>4. The U.S. House of Representatives seeks to ban the Federal Reserve from issuing digital currencies</p><p>A top Republican member of the U.S. House of Representatives has introduced a law bill seeking to ban the Federal Reserve from issuing digital dollars, saying there is a risk of \"developing a dangerous surveillance tool\" to monitor Americans' financial transactions. The bill proposed by Majority Whip Tom Emmer also calls for the Fed to submit quarterly reports to Congress on findings and decisions of research or pilot projects related to central bank digital currencies (CBDCs). The Fed is evaluating the possibility of issuing U.S. CBDCs, but has yet to decide whether to move forward.</p><p>Situation between Russia and Ukraine</p><p>1. US Treasury Secretary Yellen visits Ukraine</p><p>U.S. Treasury Secretary Yellen arrived in Kyiv, the capital of Ukraine, for a visit on February 27th, local time. Yellen announced the handover of the first $1.25 billion in aid to Ukraine from the latest U.S. aid budget of $9.9 billion. It is reported that Yellen met with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and other key government officials.</p><p>2. The energy war continues! Russia halts oil deliveries to Poland</p><p>adviser to the president and press secretary of the state oil pipeline transportation company (Transneft), Russian media reported Monday<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/002922\">Igor</a>· Jemin said that the company should have transported Russian oil to the Polish refinery at the end of February, but the relevant parties did not pay the transit fee, so the oil supply to Poland was excluded from the export plan approved by the Russian Ministry of Energy, and the Russian Pipeline Oil Transportation Company has not supplied oil to the country at present.</p><p>3. Russia claims to strike Ukrainian targets in multiple directions, and Ukraine claims to shoot down Russian fighters</p><p>The Russian Ministry of Defense reported on February 27th local time that the Russian army attacked Ukrainian personnel, tanks, armored vehicles and military vehicles in Kupyansk, Bonliman, Donetsk, Zaporizhzhia and Kherson. Russian air defense forces shot down four American-made \"Haimas\" rockets and five Ukrainian drones. The Ukrainian News Agency reported on February 27th local time that the General Staff of the Ukrainian Armed Forces said that in the past 24 hours, the Ukrainian army had repelled 81 attacks by the Russian army in multiple directions. The Ukrainian Air Force carried out four strikes on the concentration area of Russian personnel and military equipment, and shot down a Russian Su-25 fighter. Ukrainian missile units and artillery units attacked targets such as Russian ammunition depots and communication jamming stations.</p><p>Company News</p><p>1. American social platform Snapchat launches ChatGPT-like functions</p><p>On Monday, local time, Snapchat, a social application for pictures and short videos in the United States, announced that the company would launch a chat based on Open AI's latest GPT technology<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/300024\">Robot</a>My AI, will be available to paid subscription users first. In response to the known problems of ChatGPT at present, the company has also adjusted the behavior of the robot, prevented it from making outrageous remarks, and banned functions such as writing academic papers. At the close, Snapchat was up 0.71%.</p><p>2、<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/QCOM\">Qualcomm</a>Apple's 5G chip is coming soon, CEO said himself</p><p>Qualcomm CEO Cristiano Amon revealed in an interview on Monday that Qualcomm expects Apple to use self-developed communication chips in 2024, but they can continue to contact the company if they want to continue to use Qualcomm products. For Qualcomm, Apple's revenue contributed nearly $10 billion in the last fiscal year, accounting for about 22%.</p><p>Ming-Chi Kuo, a well-known technology industry analyst, also revealed on Monday that Apple has recently restarted the iPhone SE 4 project and will use self-developed 5G chips. It remains to be seen whether the higher-end iPhone 16 series uses self-developed communication chips. If it goes well on SE 4, Apple will also switch to self-developed communication chips in iPad and Apple Watch product lines.</p><p>3. Meta announced the creation of a top product team to develop generative AI</p><p>Meta CEO Zuckerberg said Monday that the company is creating a top product team focused on rapidly advancing the company's achievements in the field of generative AI. Zuckerberg said the team's main job in the short term is to create creative and expressive tools. In the long run, companies will focus on developing AI roles that can help people in a variety of ways.</p><p>Last Friday, Meta released LLaMA, a large-scale language model of artificial intelligence, on its official website. However, at present, this product is only used for research and training, and it has not yet been put into the products of social media platforms.</p><p>4. \"Buffett loves stocks\"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/OXY\">Occidental Petroleum</a>Earnings Missed Expectations</p><p>After the bell on Monday, Occidental Petroleum disclosed its fourth-quarter financial data, which included adjusted earnings of $1.61 per share, compared with analysts' expectations of $1.79; Adjusted net income of $1.6 billion in the fourth quarter; In the fourth quarter, the pre-tax chemical profit was $457 million, compared with analysts' expectations of $454.4 million; Oil and gas profit before taxes in the fourth quarter was $2.50 billion, compared with analysts' expectations of $2.63 billion.</p><p>5. Ford Battery Supplier Says F-150 Lighting Electric Pickup Fire Is Rare Incident</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/F\">Ford Motor</a>SK On, the company's battery supplier, said Monday that the flaw that caused the F-150 Lightning electric pickup to catch fire and discontinue production earlier this month was not a fundamental flaw in the power supply design. SK On, an automotive battery subsidiary of South Korea's SK Innovation Co. Ltd, said in the statement: \"We believe this is a rare incident and not a fundamental problem with battery technology or our overall manufacturing system. SK On worked with Ford to identify the root cause of the problem and implement improvements in our processes to address the problem.\"</p><p></body></html></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b23574aac95526c9e5c62ebc8dd25130","relate_stocks":{"BK4574":"无人驾驶","LU0719512351.SGD":"JPMorgan Funds - US Technology A (acc) SGD","IE00BWXC8680.SGD":"PINEBRIDGE US LARGE CAP RESEARCH ENHANCED \"A5\" (SGD) ACC","LU1551013425.SGD":"Allianz Income and Growth Cl AMg2 DIS H2-SGD","TSLA":"特斯拉","BK4551":"寇图资本持仓","TVIX":"二倍做多VIX波动率指数短期期权ETN","VIX":"标普500波动率指数","LU1861558580.USD":"日兴方舟颠覆性创新基金B",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","LU0820561818.USD":"安联收益及增长平衡基金Cl AM DIS",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite","LU0053666078.USD":"摩根大通基金-美国股票A（离岸）美元",".DJI":"道琼斯","LU1720051017.SGD":"Allianz Global Artificial Intelligence AT Acc H2-SGD","LU0082616367.USD":"摩根大通美国科技A（dist）","LU0234572021.USD":"高盛美国核心股票组合Acc"},"source_url":"","is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1139109642","content_text":"摘要：①美债收益率回落提振美股，纳指收涨0.63%，特斯拉涨超5%马斯克重夺世界首富头衔；②英欧就北爱贸易争端达成关键协议；③美国财长耶伦访问乌克兰。海外行情1、美股收涨纳指涨0.63%特斯拉涨超5%马斯克重夺世界首富头衔美股周一收高。美债收益率回落令股指得到提振。周一出炉的耐用消费品订单和制造业数据，延续了美国经济数据持续超预期的状态。投资者继续关注美国通胀状况及其对美联储政策前景的影响。截止收盘，纳斯达克指数涨0.63%，标普500指数涨0.31%，道琼斯指数涨0.22%。特斯拉涨超5%，股价较1月6日低点涨超100%。据彭博亿万富翁指数，马斯克的身价再度达到了1871亿美元，重夺世界首富头衔。大型科技股多数上涨，奈飞涨超1%，苹果、亚马逊、谷歌、微软小幅上涨；脸书小幅下跌。Fisker收涨30%，创最近两年最大单日涨幅。2、热门中概股普涨百度涨超5%热门中概股普涨，纳斯达克中国金龙指数涨1.33%。唯品会涨超7%，百度涨超5%，爱奇艺涨超4%，拼多多、小鹏汽车涨超2%，网易、微博、阿里巴巴、理想汽车、蔚来小幅上涨。哔哩哔哩跌超2%，京东小幅下跌。3、欧洲主要股指全线收涨德国DAX30指数涨1.13%欧股主要指数周一全线收涨，德国DAX30指数涨1.13%，法国CAC40指数涨1.51%，英国富时100指数涨0.72%，欧洲斯托克50指数涨1.66%。4、油价盘中跌近2%回吐上周五涨幅 美气涨超7%至月内新高对经济衰退和油需的担忧占据上风，油价止步两日连涨。WTI 4月原油期货收跌0.64美元，跌幅0.84%，报75.68美元/桶。布伦特4月原油期货收跌0.71美元，跌幅0.85%，报82.45美元/桶。欧洲基准的荷兰TTF天然气期货尾盘跌超7%，盘中跌超8%并失守50欧元/兆瓦时整数位，刷新2021年8月来的一年半最低。ICE英国天然气也跌超7%，失守120便士/千卡。美国NYMEX 4月天然气期货涨超7%，报2.7310美元/百万英热单位，创2月1日以来的月内最高。5、周一纽约黄金期货价格收高0.4% 结束五连跌纽约商品交易所4月交割的黄金期货价格上涨7.80美元，涨幅为0.4%，收于每盎司1824.90美元，此前该期货价格已连续五个交易日下跌。宏观新闻1、意外暴跌！美国耐用品订单录得32个月来最大环比降幅周一（2月27日）美股盘前，本周第一份美国经济数据——商务部公布的耐用品订单录得30多个月来的最大降幅。具体数据显示，美国1月季调后耐用品订单录得2723亿美元，较2022年12月下跌了4.5%，为2020年4月以来的最大环比跌幅。去年12月该数据环比上涨了5.1%，市场原先预计将下跌4%。2、欧洲央行行长拉加德认为3月再加息50个基点“理由充分”欧洲央行行长克里斯蒂娜·拉加德表示，欧洲央行很有可能会在下个月的会议上推进加息50个基点的意向。“有充分理由相信，我们将在3月份再加息50个基点，”拉加德在采访中说道。“再往后，我们将进一步观察。我们看数据的情况而定。”3、英欧就北爱贸易争端达成关键协议当地时间周一，英国首相苏纳克宣布，该国与欧盟签署了新的“温莎框架”协议，有望结束双方多年来在北爱尔兰贸易问题上的反复拉扯。在最关键的海关问题上，英国本土和北爱尔兰之间将设立“红色”和“绿色”通道系统：英国其他地区运往北爱尔兰地区销售的货物经“绿色通道”，不接受例行检查，而英国经北爱出口至欧盟成员国爱尔兰的货物则需要经“红色通道”接受检查。4、美国众议院寻求禁止美联储发行数字货币美国众议院一位高层共和党议员提出一项法律议案，寻求禁止美联储发行数字美元，称存在着“发展出一种危险监控工具”来监视美国人金融交易的风险。多数党党鞭Tom Emmer提出的议案还要求，美联储就与央行数字货币（CBDC）相关的研究或试点项目的发现和决定向国会提交季度报告。美联储正在评估发行美国CBDC的可能性，但尚未决定是否推进。俄乌局势1、美国财长耶伦访问乌克兰美国财政部长耶伦当地时间2月27日抵达乌克兰首都基辅进行访问。耶伦宣布，从美国最新的99亿美元援助预算中，向乌克兰移交首批12.5亿美元的援助。据悉，耶伦与乌克兰总统泽连斯基及其他主要政府官员举行了会见。2、能源战争还在继续！俄罗斯停止向波兰输送石油据俄罗斯媒体周一报道，俄罗斯国家石油管道运输公司(Transneft)总裁顾问兼新闻秘书伊戈尔·杰明表示，该公司本应在2月底向波兰炼油厂输送俄石油，但相关方面未支付过境费，因此对波兰的石油供应被排除在俄能源部批准的出口计划之外，俄管道石油运输公司目前未向该国供油。3、俄称多方位打击乌目标 乌称击落俄战机俄罗斯国防部当地时间2月27日通报称，俄军在库皮扬斯克、红利曼、顿涅茨克、扎波罗热以及赫尔松等多个方向打击乌军人员、坦克、装甲车和军用汽车等目标。俄军防空部队击落了4枚美制“海马斯”火箭弹和5架乌克兰无人机。乌克兰通讯社当地时间2月27日报道，乌克兰武装部队总参谋部称，过去24小时，乌军击退了俄军在多个方向的81次进攻。乌空军对俄军人员和军事装备集中区实施了4次打击，击落俄军一架苏-25战机。乌导弹部队和炮兵部队对俄军弹药库和通信干扰站等目标实施了打击。公司新闻1、美国社交平台Snapchat推出类ChatGPT功能当地时间周一，美国图片和短视频社交应用Snapchat发布公告称，公司将推出基于Open AI公司最新GPT技术的聊天机器人My AI，将首先向付费订阅用户开放。针对目前ChatGPT已知的问题，公司也对机器人的行为进行了调教，阻止其发表出格的言论，同时禁止了撰写学术论文等功能。截至收盘，Snapchat涨0.71%。2、高通CEO亲口说的 苹果5G芯片即将问世高通CEO克里斯蒂亚诺·阿蒙周一在接受访谈时透露，高通预期苹果将在2024年用上自研通讯芯片，不过他们想要需要继续用高通产品的话也可以继续联系公司。对于高通而言，上一财年苹果方面贡献的营收近100亿美元，大概占22%。知名科技行业分析师郭明錤也在周一透露，苹果近期已经重启了iPhone SE 4项目，并将采用自研5G芯片。更高端的iPhone 16系列是否使用自研通讯芯片仍有待观察。如果在SE 4上进展顺利，苹果也将会在iPad和Apple Watch产品线改用自研通讯芯片。3、Meta宣布创立顶级产品团队开发生成式AIMeta首席执行官扎克伯格周一表示，公司正在创立一个顶级产品团队，专注于快速推进公司在生成式AI领域的造诣。扎克伯格表示，短期内这个团队的主要工作是创建创造性和表现力工具。长远来看，公司将专注于开发能够以多种方式帮助人们的 AI 角色。上周五，Meta在官网发布了人工智能大型语言模型LLaMA，不过目前这个产品仅用于研究训练，尚未投入社交媒体平台旗下的产品。4、“巴菲特爱股”西方石油财报不及预期周一盘后，西方石油公司披露了四季度财务数据，其中调整后每股收益为1.61美元，分析师预期1.79美元；四季度调整后净收入16亿美元；四季度税前化工利润4.57亿美元，分析师预期4.544亿美元；四季度税前石油和天然气利润25.0亿美元，分析师预期26.3亿美元。5、福特电池供应商称F-150 Lighting电动皮卡起火是罕见事件福特汽车公司的电池供应商SK On周一表示，导致F-150 Lightning电动皮卡在本月早些时候起火并停产的缺陷不是电源设计上的根本性缺陷。SK On是韩国SK Innovation Co. Ltd 旗下的汽车电池子公司，该公司在声明中表示：“我们认为这是一次罕见的事件，不是电池技术或我们整体制造系统的根本问题。SK On与福特合作，确定了问题的根本原因，并在我们的流程中实施了改进措施，以解决问题。”","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"VIX":0.9,".DJI":0.9,"UBmain":0.9,"TSLA":0.9,"ZFmain":0.9,"ZNmain":0.9,"ZBmain":0.9,"TNmain":0.9,"ZTmain":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,".SPX":0.9,"TVIX":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3124,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9957891260,"gmtCreate":1677139935251,"gmtModify":1677139938439,"author":{"id":"3576892531232178","authorId":"3576892531232178","name":"uiv","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/522ae5f11b7bc763293c30c3a20671c9","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576892531232178","authorIdStr":"3576892531232178"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👍🏻","listText":"👍🏻","text":"👍🏻","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9957891260","repostId":"2313337000","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3010,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9957891603,"gmtCreate":1677139920302,"gmtModify":1677139923550,"author":{"id":"3576892531232178","authorId":"3576892531232178","name":"uiv","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/522ae5f11b7bc763293c30c3a20671c9","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576892531232178","authorIdStr":"3576892531232178"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👌🏻","listText":"👌🏻","text":"👌🏻","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9957891603","repostId":"2313833141","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2313833141","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1677136752,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2313833141?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2023-02-23 15:19","market":"us","language":"zh","title":"Bank of America Refutes Xiaomo Says \"Volatility Doomsday 2.0\" Risk is Exaggerated","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2313833141","media":"智通财经","summary":"就在摩根大通策略师Marko Kolanovic警告短期期权的爆炸式增长正在创造“ Volmageddon 2.0 ”一周后，美银分析师站出来反驳称，现在的风险被夸大了。那次被称为“波动性末日”(Vo","content":"<p><html><head></head><body>Right in<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/JPM\">JPMorgan Chase</a>A week after strategist Marko Kolanovic warned that the explosion of short-term options is creating \"Volmageddon 2.0.\" Bank of America analysts have come forward to counter that the risks are now overstated.</p><p>That event, dubbed Volmageddon, triggered market chaos five years ago and forced the closure of an exchange-traded product focused primarily on volatility. Kolanovic said that the recent surge in zero-day expiration options also threatens to cause market turmoil.</p><p>But Bank of America strategists, including Nitin Saksena, believe investors' positioning in hot derivatives-driven trades — such as S&P 500 contracts maturing within 24 hours — appears less threatening to the broader market than the frenzy that led to the volatility plunge in 2018.</p><p>Bank of America believes that the reality is more nuanced. Given that short-term options are used in so many different strategies, the shock to the broader stock market could be manageable if one investment style falters.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0163dbf4cde4a5a954b5bf8c7ec10407\" tg-width=\"419\" tg-height=\"375\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>BofA said some \"issued warnings that targeted end users are net shorting loss-making 0DTEs, thereby planting the seeds for events similar to the 'volatility apocalypse' 5 years ago.\"\"The evidence to date suggests that the 0DTE position is more balanced/complex than a simple one-way short tail market.\"</p><p>Since mid-2022, the rise of 0DTE options has often been blamed for amplifying the volatility of the underlying asset. Such contracts now account for an average of 40% to 45% of the index's daily trading volume, up from 21% in 2021, according to Bank of America estimates.</p><p>In Kolanovic's view, the risk involves options traders, who are on the other side of the trade and must buy and sell stocks to maintain a market-neutral position. His models show that such intraday selling would reach $30 billion on a day of sharp declines.</p><p>Bank of America says the sell-off won't be so fast. In Saksena's view, the extreme positions of investors contributed to the \"volatility apocalypse\" event of 2018, when everyone was betting that volatility would decline, leaving the market prone to a drastic reversal.</p><p>At the time, the culprit was exchange-traded products designed to pay investors the opposite of the volatility of stocks. When stock market turmoil intensified in early February of that year, it triggered a snowball effect that ultimately caused many of these strategies to quickly become worthless, sending the S&P 500 Index tumbling 10% in two weeks.</p><p>The factors of current market volatility, such as extremely one-sided positions, are largely absent, says Saksena of Bank of America. Take, for example, implied volatility, a measure of the cost of an option. For 0DTE contracts, they typically receive a pricing premium of 2.5 times that of longer-term S&P 500 options, a level the team says \"may not be consistent with a market overrun by options sellers.\"</p><p>In the modern age of fast trading, predicting stock movements has always been a vexation, especially when it comes to threats posed by technical forces such as trader positioning. A daunting crash usually doesn't follow, or breaks out in unexpected ways, making life harder for professional forecasters.</p><p>Anyway, after tracking the order flow throughout the day, Saksena and his team found that traders tend to buy options in the morning and sell them in the afternoon. This model applies equally to bullish and bearish contacts, again showing that this is not a one-way market.</p><p>According to the bank's research, you can make money by holding options on the S&P 500 over an hour-long interval within the session, whether it's a call or a put. In BofA's view, this increases the incentive for investors to bet both ways, rather than leaning toward the side that has the potential to hit the market hard.</p><p>According to Saksena, in 2018 \"all indications are that the market is very one-way short, and you know if there is some kind of catalyst that can ignite the spark. Huge risks are waiting to unfold.\"\"Right now, with positions seemingly more balanced — you could still have some gap swings in the session, or surprising mean returns against fundamentals — the expectation rate for a major shock is much higher.\"</p><p></body></html></p>","source":"stock_zhitongcaijing","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Bank of America Refutes Xiaomo Says \"Volatility Doomsday 2.0\" Risk is Exaggerated</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBank of America Refutes Xiaomo Says \"Volatility Doomsday 2.0\" Risk is Exaggerated\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">智通财经</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2023-02-23 15:19</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><html><head></head><body>Right in<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/JPM\">JPMorgan Chase</a>A week after strategist Marko Kolanovic warned that the explosion of short-term options is creating \"Volmageddon 2.0.\" Bank of America analysts have come forward to counter that the risks are now overstated.</p><p>That event, dubbed Volmageddon, triggered market chaos five years ago and forced the closure of an exchange-traded product focused primarily on volatility. Kolanovic said that the recent surge in zero-day expiration options also threatens to cause market turmoil.</p><p>But Bank of America strategists, including Nitin Saksena, believe investors' positioning in hot derivatives-driven trades — such as S&P 500 contracts maturing within 24 hours — appears less threatening to the broader market than the frenzy that led to the volatility plunge in 2018.</p><p>Bank of America believes that the reality is more nuanced. Given that short-term options are used in so many different strategies, the shock to the broader stock market could be manageable if one investment style falters.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0163dbf4cde4a5a954b5bf8c7ec10407\" tg-width=\"419\" tg-height=\"375\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>BofA said some \"issued warnings that targeted end users are net shorting loss-making 0DTEs, thereby planting the seeds for events similar to the 'volatility apocalypse' 5 years ago.\"\"The evidence to date suggests that the 0DTE position is more balanced/complex than a simple one-way short tail market.\"</p><p>Since mid-2022, the rise of 0DTE options has often been blamed for amplifying the volatility of the underlying asset. Such contracts now account for an average of 40% to 45% of the index's daily trading volume, up from 21% in 2021, according to Bank of America estimates.</p><p>In Kolanovic's view, the risk involves options traders, who are on the other side of the trade and must buy and sell stocks to maintain a market-neutral position. His models show that such intraday selling would reach $30 billion on a day of sharp declines.</p><p>Bank of America says the sell-off won't be so fast. In Saksena's view, the extreme positions of investors contributed to the \"volatility apocalypse\" event of 2018, when everyone was betting that volatility would decline, leaving the market prone to a drastic reversal.</p><p>At the time, the culprit was exchange-traded products designed to pay investors the opposite of the volatility of stocks. When stock market turmoil intensified in early February of that year, it triggered a snowball effect that ultimately caused many of these strategies to quickly become worthless, sending the S&P 500 Index tumbling 10% in two weeks.</p><p>The factors of current market volatility, such as extremely one-sided positions, are largely absent, says Saksena of Bank of America. Take, for example, implied volatility, a measure of the cost of an option. For 0DTE contracts, they typically receive a pricing premium of 2.5 times that of longer-term S&P 500 options, a level the team says \"may not be consistent with a market overrun by options sellers.\"</p><p>In the modern age of fast trading, predicting stock movements has always been a vexation, especially when it comes to threats posed by technical forces such as trader positioning. A daunting crash usually doesn't follow, or breaks out in unexpected ways, making life harder for professional forecasters.</p><p>Anyway, after tracking the order flow throughout the day, Saksena and his team found that traders tend to buy options in the morning and sell them in the afternoon. This model applies equally to bullish and bearish contacts, again showing that this is not a one-way market.</p><p>According to the bank's research, you can make money by holding options on the S&P 500 over an hour-long interval within the session, whether it's a call or a put. In BofA's view, this increases the incentive for investors to bet both ways, rather than leaning toward the side that has the potential to hit the market hard.</p><p>According to Saksena, in 2018 \"all indications are that the market is very one-way short, and you know if there is some kind of catalyst that can ignite the spark. Huge risks are waiting to unfold.\"\"Right now, with positions seemingly more balanced — you could still have some gap swings in the session, or surprising mean returns against fundamentals — the expectation rate for a major shock is much higher.\"</p><p></body></html></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> source：<a href=\"http://www.zhitongcaijing.com/content/detail/881205.html\">智通财经</a></p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8effccd1ec9cd7dcf99c09781659ff15","relate_stocks":{"LU1496350171.SGD":"FRANKLIN DIVERSIFIED BALANCED \"A\" (SGDHDG) ACC","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","LU0320765489.SGD":"FTIF - Franklin Mutual US Value A Acc SGD","LU1496350502.SGD":"FRANKLIN DIVERSIFIED DYNAMIC \"A\" (SGDHDG) ACC","BK4533":"AQR资本管理(全球第二大对冲基金)","BK4566":"资本集团","LU0211326755.USD":"TEMPLETON GLOBAL INCOME \"A\" (USD) ACC","SG9999002232.USD":"Allianz Global High Payout USD","LU0310799852.SGD":"FTIF - Templeton Global Equity Income A MDIS SGD","LU0320765646.SGD":"FTIF - Franklin Income A MDIS SGD-H1","LU1244550221.USD":"FRANKLIN GLOBAL MULTI-ASSET  INCOME \"A\" (USDHEDGED) INC (M)","LU0170899867.USD":"EASTSPRING INVESTMENTS WORLD VALUE EQUITY  \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU0971096721.USD":"富达环球金融服务 A","LU0976567544.SGD":"FTIF - Templeton Global Income A Mdis SGD-H1","SG9999002224.SGD":"Allianz Global High Payout SGD","LU0417517546.SGD":"Allianz US Equity Cl AT Acc SGD","LU1267930490.SGD":"TEMPLETON GLOBAL EQUITY INCOME \"AS\" (SGD) INC A","BK4504":"桥水持仓","LU0149725797.USD":"汇丰美国股市经济规模基金","LU0106831901.USD":"贝莱德世界金融基金A2","LU0882574139.USD":"富达环球消费行业基金A ACC","BK4588":"碎股","LU1668664300.SGD":"Blackrock World Financials A2 SGD-H","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓","LU1162221912.USD":"FRANKLIN INCOME \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU0070302665.USD":"FRANKLIN MUTUAL U.S. VALUE \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU0208291251.USD":"FRANKLIN MUTUAL U.S. VALUE \"A\" (USD) INC","LU1244550494.USD":"FRANKLIN GLOBAL MULTI-ASSET INCOME \"A\" (USDHEDGED) ACC","LU0256863811.USD":"ALLIANZ US EQUITY \"A\" INC","BK4207":"综合性银行","LU1261432733.SGD":"Fidelity World A-ACC-SGD","IE00B1BXHZ80.USD":"Legg Mason ClearBridge - US Appreciation A Acc USD","LU0211328371.USD":"TEMPLETON GLOBAL EQUITY INCOME \"A\" (MDIS) (USD)   INC","LU0496365809.HKD":"TEMPLETON GLOBAL INCOME \"A\" (HKD) INC (Q)","IE0034235188.USD":"PINEBRIDGE GLOBAL FOCUS EQUITY \"A\" (USD) ACC","BK4581":"高盛持仓","LU1244550577.SGD":"FTIF - Franklin Global Multi-Asset Income A (Mdis) SGD-H1","JPM":"摩根大通","LU0211327993.USD":"TEMPLETON GLOBAL EQUITY INCOME \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU1363072403.SGD":"Fidelity Global Financial Services A-ACC-SGD","LU0211326839.USD":"TEMPLETON GLOBAL INCOME \"A\" (USD) INC","BK4585":"ETF&股票定投概念"},"source_url":"http://www.zhitongcaijing.com/content/detail/881205.html","is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2313833141","content_text":"就在摩根大通策略师Marko Kolanovic警告短期期权的爆炸式增长正在创造“ Volmageddon 2.0 ”一周后，美银分析师站出来反驳称，现在的风险被夸大了。那次被称为“波动性末日”(Volmageddon)的事件在五年前引发了市场混乱，并迫使一个主要关注波动性的交易所交易产品关闭。Kolanovic表示，最近零日(zero days)到期期权的激增，也有可能造成市场动荡。但包括 Nitin Saksena 在内的美国银行策略师认为，与导致 2018 年波动率暴跌的狂热相比，投资者在热门衍生品驱动交易中的定位——例如 24 小时内到期的标准普尔 500 指数合约——对更广泛市场的威胁似乎较小。美银认为，现实情况更加微妙。鉴于短期期权被用于如此多不同的策略中，如果一种投资风格动摇，对更广泛股市的冲击可能是可控的。美银表示，一些人“发出了警告，称定向终端用户正在净做空赔本的0DTEs，从而为类似于5年前‘波动性末日’的事件埋下了种子。”“迄今为止的证据表明，0DTE的仓位比一个简单的单向短尾市场更为平衡/复杂。”自2022年年中以来，0DTE期权的兴起经常被指责放大了基础资产的波动。据美国银行估计，目前此类合约平均占该指数日交易量的40%至45%，高于2021年的21%。在Kolanovic看来，风险涉及期权交易商，他们在交易中处于另一方，必须买卖股票以保持市场中立的立场。他的模型显示，在一个大幅下跌的日子里，这样的盘中抛售将达到300亿美元。美国银行称，抛售不会这么快。在Saksena看来，投资者的极端仓位助长了2018年的“波动性末日”事件，当时所有人都押注波动性会下降，导致市场容易出现剧烈逆转。当时，罪魁祸首是旨在向投资者支付与股票波动率相反报酬的交易所交易产品。当年2月初股市动荡加剧时，引发了滚雪球效应，最终导致许多此类策略迅速变得毫无价值，导致标准普尔500指数在两周内暴跌10%。美国银行的Saksena表示，目前市场震荡的因素，比如极度一边倒的仓位，基本不存在。以隐含波动率为例，这是一种衡量期权成本的指标。对于0DTE合约，它们通常获得的定价溢价是较长期标准普尔500指数期权的2.5倍，该团队表示，这一水平“可能与期权卖方泛滥的市场不一致”。在快速交易的现代时代，预测股票走势一直是一件令人烦恼的事情，尤其是在涉及到交易商定位等技术力量构成的威胁时。令人生畏的崩盘通常不会随之而来，或者以意想不到的方式爆发，这让专业预测者的日子更加艰难。无论如何，在跟踪了一天的订单流后，Saksena及其团队发现，交易员倾向于在上午买入期权，下午抛出。这种模式同样适用于看多和看空联系人，再次表明这不是一个单向市场。根据该银行的研究，无论是看涨期权还是看跌期权，在盘中一小时的时间间隔内持有标普500指数期权都能赚钱。在美银看来，这增加了投资者双向押注的动机，而不是倾向于有可能让市场遭受重创的一方。Saksena表示，在2018年“所有迹象都表明，市场非常单向做空，你知道是否有某种催化剂可以点燃火花。巨大的风险正等待着展开，”“目前，由于仓位似乎更加平衡——你仍可能在盘中出现一些缺口波动，或违背基本面的令人惊讶的均值回归——出现重大冲击的期望率要高得多。”","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"JPM":1}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1165,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9957891354,"gmtCreate":1677139901679,"gmtModify":1677139904830,"author":{"id":"3576892531232178","authorId":"3576892531232178","name":"uiv","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/522ae5f11b7bc763293c30c3a20671c9","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576892531232178","authorIdStr":"3576892531232178"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👍🏻","listText":"👍🏻","text":"👍🏻","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9957891354","repostId":"1164117178","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1239,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9957891959,"gmtCreate":1677139885071,"gmtModify":1677139888631,"author":{"id":"3576892531232178","authorId":"3576892531232178","name":"uiv","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/522ae5f11b7bc763293c30c3a20671c9","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576892531232178","authorIdStr":"3576892531232178"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👌🏻","listText":"👌🏻","text":"👌🏻","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9957891959","repostId":"2313835550","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2313835550","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1677137719,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2313835550?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2023-02-23 15:35","market":"us","language":"zh","title":"The epitome of the end of the \"big era of science and technology\": Silicon Valley Bank's profits have shrunk, its market value has plummeted, and it has become a \"turtle in a barrel\" for shorts","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2313835550","media":"华尔街见闻","summary":"“科技大时代”的落幕并不止于科技企业的节衣缩食，那些曾经为他们“撑腰”的银行们如今也面临“清算”。据报道，美国加州为初创企业提供融资的硅谷银行(Silicon Valley Bank, SVB)正面临","content":"<p><html><head></head><body>The end of the \"big era of science and technology\" does not stop at the economy of technology enterprises. Those banks that once \"supported\" them are now facing \"liquidation\".</p><p>According to reports, California, the United States provides financing for start-ups<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SIVB\">Silicon Valley Bank</a>(Silicon Valley Bank, SVB) is facing scrutiny after an investment it made during the tech boom has now caused an unrealized loss of $15 billion, shaking the Bank's profitability.</p><p>The bank insisted on holding its $91 billion bond portfolio until maturity, a decision that insulated its profits from last year's turmoil in financial markets as long-term bond yields rose sharply, outpacing the portfolio's 1.64% yield.</p><p><b>But \"hold-to-maturity\" also means that at the end of last year, this asset was valued on SVB's balance sheet at a purchase price of $91 billion, rather than at a market value of $76 billion. Directly led to SVB's disclosure of an unrealized loss of $15 billion.</b></p><p>SVB, which mainly provides financing services for tech and life sciences start-ups backed by venture capital funds, is the 16th largest bank in the United States with total assets worth about $212 billion.<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CSCO\">Cisco</a>(Cisco), Ring, Beyond Meat, and Shopify were among its customers.</p><p>As U.S. tech start-ups face their biggest plunge in market capitalization since the dot-com bubble burst in the early 2000s,<b>SVB's market cap has fallen from a peak of more than $44 billion less than two years ago to $17 billion today.</b></p><p>SVB's decline has also attracted the attention of bears, who are betting on further declines in the bank's share price. SVB shares have fallen 50% since the beginning of 2022.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/98ffaf5a9a3d0a5a093db75c1cf353db\" tg-width=\"840\" tg-height=\"470\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>Speaking to the media, SVB CEO Greg Becker said:</p><p>This is going to be a challenging year for the tech industry…we really only see a beginning. There will be more headlines about failures and layoffs (in the tech industry). Whether this volatility period is 12 months or 18 months, our goal is to be able to ensure that we have the ability to support our clients through this time. Error in decision making</p><p>Wrong investment decisions and misjudgment of the pace of the Fed's rate hike are also the main reasons for SVB's predicament.</p><p><b>SVB's income comes from regular financial businesses such as funds and asset management, but unlike other banks,</b>SVB's core business focuses on providing deposit services for cash raised by tech start-ups.</p><p>SVB's customer deposits ballooned from $102 billion to $189 billion amid the boom in tech investments in 2021, flooded with \"excess liquidity.\"</p><p>SVB, meanwhile, keeps these deposits by buying long-term mortgage-backed securities issued by U.S. government agencies. Actually,<b>This strategy is the equivalent of locking half of its assets in investments for the next decade that generate little income by today's standards.</b></p><p>Becker explains that these \"conservative\" investments are part of a plan to shore up bank balance sheets:</p><p>In 2021, frankly, valuations and the amount of money being raised are clearly at epic levels.....so we looked and decided to be more cautious. This decision means that SVB will be more vulnerable to interest rate changes.</p><p>The problem is the difference between the interest SVB earns on assets such as loans and the interest it pays on deposits —<b>That is, net interest income – is becoming less and less.</b></p><p>When interest rates are low,<b>Several big banks are putting more deposits on government debt, accepting lower returns in times of economic uncertainty</b>。 While SVB's relative exposure far exceeds that of its peers.</p><p>At the end of 2022, SVB had $120 billion in investment securities, including a $91 billion portfolio of mortgage-backed securities, far exceeding the $74 billion in total loans.</p><p>By comparison, Bank of America has $863 billion in debt securities, including $633 billion in held-to-maturity assets, less than its roughly $10 trillion in loans and leases.</p><p>As a result of the huge difference between loans and deposits,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/JPM\">JPMorgan Chase</a>, Bank of America, Citi and<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/WFC\">Wells Fargo</a>Interest income in the last quarter of 2022 totaled nearly $60 billion, up 30% from the same period last year. Meanwhile, SVB told investors,<b>It expects its net interest income to decline 17-19% in 2023 from last year's $4.5 billion.</b></p><p>A securities analyst told the media:</p><p><b>Interest rates have been low for a long time, and many people think they will stay low forever.</b>SVB is betting bigger than the average person on this. Becker said:</p><p>We expected interest rates to rise, but didn't expect them to be as much as they are now.</body></html></p>","source":"wallstreetcn","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>The epitome of the end of the \"big era of science and technology\": Silicon Valley Bank's profits have shrunk, its market value has plummeted, and it has become a \"turtle in a barrel\" for shorts</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nThe epitome of the end of the \"big era of science and technology\": Silicon Valley Bank's profits have shrunk, its market value has plummeted, and it has become a \"turtle in a barrel\" for shorts\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">华尔街见闻</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2023-02-23 15:35</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><html><head></head><body>The end of the \"big era of science and technology\" does not stop at the economy of technology enterprises. Those banks that once \"supported\" them are now facing \"liquidation\".</p><p>According to reports, California, the United States provides financing for start-ups<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SIVB\">Silicon Valley Bank</a>(Silicon Valley Bank, SVB) is facing scrutiny after an investment it made during the tech boom has now caused an unrealized loss of $15 billion, shaking the Bank's profitability.</p><p>The bank insisted on holding its $91 billion bond portfolio until maturity, a decision that insulated its profits from last year's turmoil in financial markets as long-term bond yields rose sharply, outpacing the portfolio's 1.64% yield.</p><p><b>But \"hold-to-maturity\" also means that at the end of last year, this asset was valued on SVB's balance sheet at a purchase price of $91 billion, rather than at a market value of $76 billion. Directly led to SVB's disclosure of an unrealized loss of $15 billion.</b></p><p>SVB, which mainly provides financing services for tech and life sciences start-ups backed by venture capital funds, is the 16th largest bank in the United States with total assets worth about $212 billion.<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CSCO\">Cisco</a>(Cisco), Ring, Beyond Meat, and Shopify were among its customers.</p><p>As U.S. tech start-ups face their biggest plunge in market capitalization since the dot-com bubble burst in the early 2000s,<b>SVB's market cap has fallen from a peak of more than $44 billion less than two years ago to $17 billion today.</b></p><p>SVB's decline has also attracted the attention of bears, who are betting on further declines in the bank's share price. SVB shares have fallen 50% since the beginning of 2022.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/98ffaf5a9a3d0a5a093db75c1cf353db\" tg-width=\"840\" tg-height=\"470\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>Speaking to the media, SVB CEO Greg Becker said:</p><p>This is going to be a challenging year for the tech industry…we really only see a beginning. There will be more headlines about failures and layoffs (in the tech industry). Whether this volatility period is 12 months or 18 months, our goal is to be able to ensure that we have the ability to support our clients through this time. Error in decision making</p><p>Wrong investment decisions and misjudgment of the pace of the Fed's rate hike are also the main reasons for SVB's predicament.</p><p><b>SVB's income comes from regular financial businesses such as funds and asset management, but unlike other banks,</b>SVB's core business focuses on providing deposit services for cash raised by tech start-ups.</p><p>SVB's customer deposits ballooned from $102 billion to $189 billion amid the boom in tech investments in 2021, flooded with \"excess liquidity.\"</p><p>SVB, meanwhile, keeps these deposits by buying long-term mortgage-backed securities issued by U.S. government agencies. Actually,<b>This strategy is the equivalent of locking half of its assets in investments for the next decade that generate little income by today's standards.</b></p><p>Becker explains that these \"conservative\" investments are part of a plan to shore up bank balance sheets:</p><p>In 2021, frankly, valuations and the amount of money being raised are clearly at epic levels.....so we looked and decided to be more cautious. This decision means that SVB will be more vulnerable to interest rate changes.</p><p>The problem is the difference between the interest SVB earns on assets such as loans and the interest it pays on deposits —<b>That is, net interest income – is becoming less and less.</b></p><p>When interest rates are low,<b>Several big banks are putting more deposits on government debt, accepting lower returns in times of economic uncertainty</b>。 While SVB's relative exposure far exceeds that of its peers.</p><p>At the end of 2022, SVB had $120 billion in investment securities, including a $91 billion portfolio of mortgage-backed securities, far exceeding the $74 billion in total loans.</p><p>By comparison, Bank of America has $863 billion in debt securities, including $633 billion in held-to-maturity assets, less than its roughly $10 trillion in loans and leases.</p><p>As a result of the huge difference between loans and deposits,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/JPM\">JPMorgan Chase</a>, Bank of America, Citi and<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/WFC\">Wells Fargo</a>Interest income in the last quarter of 2022 totaled nearly $60 billion, up 30% from the same period last year. Meanwhile, SVB told investors,<b>It expects its net interest income to decline 17-19% in 2023 from last year's $4.5 billion.</b></p><p>A securities analyst told the media:</p><p><b>Interest rates have been low for a long time, and many people think they will stay low forever.</b>SVB is betting bigger than the average person on this. Becker said:</p><p>We expected interest rates to rise, but didn't expect them to be as much as they are now.</body></html></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> source：<a href=\"https://wallstreetcn.com/articles/3682597\">华尔街见闻</a></p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/52e95f8d8c314466bbcd01bdb562ed3f","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://wallstreetcn.com/articles/3682597","is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2313835550","content_text":"“科技大时代”的落幕并不止于科技企业的节衣缩食，那些曾经为他们“撑腰”的银行们如今也面临“清算”。据报道，美国加州为初创企业提供融资的硅谷银行(Silicon Valley Bank, SVB)正面临审查，原因是该行在科技热潮时期做出的一项投资如今造成了150亿美元的未变现亏损，动摇了该行的盈利能力。该银行坚持将其910亿美元的债券组合持有至到期，这一决定使其利润免受去年金融市场动荡的影响，因为长期债券收益率急剧上升，超过了该组合1.64%的收益率。但“持有至到期”也意味着，在去年年底，这一资产在SVB的资产负债表上是按照910亿美元的购买价格估值的，而不是按照760亿美元的市场价值。直接导致了SVB披露了150亿美元的未实现亏损。SVB主要为风投基金支持的科技和生命科学初创企业提供融资服务，该行是美国第16大银行，总资产价值约2120亿美元。思科(Cisco)、Ring、Beyond Meat和Shopify等公司都曾是其客户。随着美国科技初创企业面临自本世纪初互联网泡沫破裂以来最大的市值暴跌，SVB的市值已从不到两年前逾440亿美元的峰值降至如今的170亿美元。SVB的跌势也吸引了空头的注意，他们押注该行股价将进一步下跌。自2022年初以来，SVB股价已下跌50%。SVB首席执行官Greg Becker接受媒体采访时表示：今年对科技行业而言将是充满挑战的一年……我们真的只看到了一个开头。将会有更多关于失败和(科技行业)裁员的头条新闻。无论这个波动期是12个月还是18个月，我们的目标是能够确保我们有能力支持客户度过这段时间。决策失误错误的投资决策和对美联储加息节奏的误判，也是导致SVB困境的主要原因。SVB的收入来自基金、资产管理等常规金融业务，但与其他银行所不同的是，SVB的核心业务集中在为科技初创企业筹集的现金提供存款服务。在2021年科技投资的热潮中，SVB的客户存款从1020亿美元激增至1890亿美元，充斥着“过剩的流动性”。与此同时，SVB保管这些存款的方式是：购买美国政府机构发行的长期抵押贷款支持证券。实际上，这种策略相当于将其一半的资产锁定在未来十年的投资中，按照今天的标准，这些投资的收入很少。Becker解释称，这些 \"保守 \"的投资是支撑银行资产负债表的计划的一部分:2021年，坦率地说，估值和正在筹集的资金数额显然处于史诗般的水平......所以我们看了看，决定更加谨慎。这一决定意味着，SVB将更容易受到利率变化的影响。问题在于，SVB从贷款等资产上赚取的利息和它在存款上支付的利息之间的差异——也就是净利息收入——正在变得越来越少。当利率处于低位时，几家大银行将更多的存款放在政府债务上，在经济不确定的时期接受较低的回报率。而SVB的相对风险敞口远远超过了其同行。截至2022年底，SVB拥有1200亿美元的投资证券，其中包括910亿美元的抵押贷款支持证券组合，远远超过了740亿美元的贷款总额。相比之下，美国银行拥有8630亿美元的债务证券，包括6330亿美元的持有至到期资产，低于其约10万亿美元的贷款和租赁。贷款与存款差额巨大的结果是，摩根大通、美国银行、花旗和富国银行在2022年最后一个季度的利息收入合计近600亿美元，比去年同期增长30%。与此同时，SVB告诉投资者，预计2023年其净利息收入将比去年的45亿美元下降17-19%。一位证券分析师对媒体表示：利率长期以来一直很低，很多人都认为利率会永远低下去。SVB在这方面下了比一般人更大的赌注。Becker则表示：我们预计利率会上升，但没有想到会像现在这么多。","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"SIVB":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1248,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9957891065,"gmtCreate":1677139866158,"gmtModify":1677139869310,"author":{"id":"3576892531232178","authorId":"3576892531232178","name":"uiv","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/522ae5f11b7bc763293c30c3a20671c9","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576892531232178","authorIdStr":"3576892531232178"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👍🏻","listText":"👍🏻","text":"👍🏻","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9957891065","repostId":"2313835177","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2313835177","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1677138207,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2313835177?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2023-02-23 15:43","market":"us","language":"zh","title":"Billions of dollars more costs! Tech giants face new challenges in launching ChatGPT-like services","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2313835177","media":"智通财经","summary":"Alphabet在谷歌搜索中加入生成性人工智能(generative artificial intelligence)的尝试给行业带来了一个全新的挑战：成本问题。整个科技行业的高管都在讨论如何运营像C","content":"<p><html><head></head><body>Alphabet in<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GOOG\">Google</a>The attempt to include generative artificial intelligence in search presents an entirely new challenge for the industry: the issue of cost. Executives across the tech industry are talking about how to run an AI like ChatGPT and balance its high maintenance costs.</p><p>Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, said that ChatGPT can answer search questions autonomously, and the computational cost per conversation is a few cents or more. This high usage fee data is \"eye-popping\".</p><p>In implementation, communicating with AI, known as large language models, could cost 10 times more than standard keyword searches, although code optimization will help reduce costs quickly, according to Alphabet's chairman John Hennessy.</p><p>Even with potential chat-based search advertising revenue, using the technology could add billions of dollars in additional usage costs, affecting Alphabet's bottom line, analysts said. The company achieved net revenue of nearly $60 billion in 2022.</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MS\">Morgan Stanley</a>It is estimated that Google spent about a fifth of a cent each of its 3.3 trillion search queries last year, but that number will increase this year, depending on the length of text the AI must generate. For example, analysts predict that if AI like ChatGPT can handle half the volume of inquiries in responses of less than 50 words, Google's expenses will increase by nearly $6 billion by 2024.</p><p>Other businesses have reached similar conclusions in different ways. For example, Semi Analysis, a research and consulting firm focused on chip technology, said adding ChatGPT-like AI to the search engine could add $3 billion to Alphabet's spending, limited by Google's internal chip, Tensor Processing Unit (TPU), as well as other optimizations.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/674bb0bf932a8c9cfc53d7d53a96d202\" tg-width=\"688\" tg-height=\"405\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>What makes this AI more expensive than traditional methods of search is the computing power involved. Analysts say the operation of this AI is based on multibillion-dollar chips, the cost of which must be digested over the chip's several-year lifespan. Similarly, electricity consumption also increases the cost and pressure on companies targeting their carbon footprint.</p><p>The process of processing artificial intelligence search queries is called \"reasoning\". In this process, the \"neural network\" simulates the biological way of thinking of the human brain, and can constantly infer the answer to the search question from previous training.</p><p>By contrast, in the traditional way of searching, Google's web crawler scans the stored Internet to index information. When a user types a query, Google provides the most relevant answers stored in an index. Alphabet's Hennessy said that \"the cost overhead of running the AI\" inference \"process must be reduced,\" calling it a common \"puzzle\" for the industry in the past two years.</p><p>It is reported that despite the high cost, Alphabet is still under pressure from competitors to challenge. Earlier this month,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSFT\">Microsoft</a>(MSFT.US) announced plans to embed AI-powered chat technology into its Bing search engine, with Similarweb estimating that Microsoft is targeting 91% of Google's search market share.</p><p>Amy Hood, chief financial officer of Microsoft, said that as the new Bing search launches to millions of consumers, the revenue from users and advertisements will cover more than the cost expenditure. \"For us, even at the expense of service costs, it can provide an increase to the gross profit margin of the company's business\".</p><p>Richard Socher, chief executive of search engine You.com, another Google's competitor, also said that adding AI chat experiences and apps that generate charts, videos and other technologies can increase costs and expenses for businesses by 30 to 50 percent. However, it pointed out: \"Over time, the cost of using AI technology will become lower and lower.\"</p><p>On the other hand, a source close to Google warned that now accurately identifying AI chat<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/300024\">Robot</a>The cost overhead is premature, mainly because efficiency and usage still vary widely depending on the technology involved.</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ACN\">Accenture</a>One of the main reasons why search and social media giants with billions of users in the tech industry didn't launch AI chatbots overnight is the issue of paying cost bills, according to CTO Paul Daugherty. He pointed out: \"One is the accuracy of search, and the other is the industry must measure the cost overhead in the right way.\"</p><p>For years, researchers at Alphabet have been studying how to train and run large AI language models at a cheaper cost. AI is still too expensive to use in the hands of millions of consumers, according to a senior technology executive in the industry. \"These AI models are very expensive to run and maintain, so the next stage of the industry's advancement will be to reduce the cost of training these AI models and running inference so that we can use them in every application.\"</p><p>A person familiar with the matter said that at present, researchers inside OpenAI have found ways to optimize the inference cost through complex code, so that the chip can run more efficiently. But a spokesperson for OpenAI did not immediately comment.</p><p>Among them, a long-term question is how to reduce the number of parameters in an AI model by a factor of 10 or even 100 without losing accuracy.</p><p>\"How to most effectively weed out (parameters) remains an open question,\" notes Naveen Rao, who was responsible for<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/INTC\">Intel</a>The AI chip division, is now working to reduce the computing costs of AI through his startup, Mosaic ML.</p><p>In addition, some enterprises are also considering charging for access. For example, OpenAI has added a monthly subscription service of $20 to provide users with better ChatGPT services. Technology experts also say that one solution is to apply simpler AI models to simpler tasks, which Alphabet is exploring.</p><p>The company said this month that a \"simple model\" version of its massive LaMDA AI technology will give its chatbot \"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BCR\">Bud</a>\"Empowerment,\" the computing power required will be greatly reduced, enabling it to reach more users \".</p><p>Asked about running AI chatbots like ChatGPT and \"Bud,\" Hennessy said using a more targeted technology model, rather than providing all services in one system, would help \"reduce costs.\"</p><p></body></html></p>","source":"stock_zhitongcaijing","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Billions of dollars more costs! Tech giants face new challenges in launching ChatGPT-like services</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBillions of dollars more costs! Tech giants face new challenges in launching ChatGPT-like services\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">智通财经</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2023-02-23 15:43</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><html><head></head><body>Alphabet in<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GOOG\">Google</a>The attempt to include generative artificial intelligence in search presents an entirely new challenge for the industry: the issue of cost. Executives across the tech industry are talking about how to run an AI like ChatGPT and balance its high maintenance costs.</p><p>Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, said that ChatGPT can answer search questions autonomously, and the computational cost per conversation is a few cents or more. This high usage fee data is \"eye-popping\".</p><p>In implementation, communicating with AI, known as large language models, could cost 10 times more than standard keyword searches, although code optimization will help reduce costs quickly, according to Alphabet's chairman John Hennessy.</p><p>Even with potential chat-based search advertising revenue, using the technology could add billions of dollars in additional usage costs, affecting Alphabet's bottom line, analysts said. The company achieved net revenue of nearly $60 billion in 2022.</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MS\">Morgan Stanley</a>It is estimated that Google spent about a fifth of a cent each of its 3.3 trillion search queries last year, but that number will increase this year, depending on the length of text the AI must generate. For example, analysts predict that if AI like ChatGPT can handle half the volume of inquiries in responses of less than 50 words, Google's expenses will increase by nearly $6 billion by 2024.</p><p>Other businesses have reached similar conclusions in different ways. For example, Semi Analysis, a research and consulting firm focused on chip technology, said adding ChatGPT-like AI to the search engine could add $3 billion to Alphabet's spending, limited by Google's internal chip, Tensor Processing Unit (TPU), as well as other optimizations.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/674bb0bf932a8c9cfc53d7d53a96d202\" tg-width=\"688\" tg-height=\"405\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>What makes this AI more expensive than traditional methods of search is the computing power involved. Analysts say the operation of this AI is based on multibillion-dollar chips, the cost of which must be digested over the chip's several-year lifespan. Similarly, electricity consumption also increases the cost and pressure on companies targeting their carbon footprint.</p><p>The process of processing artificial intelligence search queries is called \"reasoning\". In this process, the \"neural network\" simulates the biological way of thinking of the human brain, and can constantly infer the answer to the search question from previous training.</p><p>By contrast, in the traditional way of searching, Google's web crawler scans the stored Internet to index information. When a user types a query, Google provides the most relevant answers stored in an index. Alphabet's Hennessy said that \"the cost overhead of running the AI\" inference \"process must be reduced,\" calling it a common \"puzzle\" for the industry in the past two years.</p><p>It is reported that despite the high cost, Alphabet is still under pressure from competitors to challenge. Earlier this month,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSFT\">Microsoft</a>(MSFT.US) announced plans to embed AI-powered chat technology into its Bing search engine, with Similarweb estimating that Microsoft is targeting 91% of Google's search market share.</p><p>Amy Hood, chief financial officer of Microsoft, said that as the new Bing search launches to millions of consumers, the revenue from users and advertisements will cover more than the cost expenditure. \"For us, even at the expense of service costs, it can provide an increase to the gross profit margin of the company's business\".</p><p>Richard Socher, chief executive of search engine You.com, another Google's competitor, also said that adding AI chat experiences and apps that generate charts, videos and other technologies can increase costs and expenses for businesses by 30 to 50 percent. However, it pointed out: \"Over time, the cost of using AI technology will become lower and lower.\"</p><p>On the other hand, a source close to Google warned that now accurately identifying AI chat<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/300024\">Robot</a>The cost overhead is premature, mainly because efficiency and usage still vary widely depending on the technology involved.</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ACN\">Accenture</a>One of the main reasons why search and social media giants with billions of users in the tech industry didn't launch AI chatbots overnight is the issue of paying cost bills, according to CTO Paul Daugherty. He pointed out: \"One is the accuracy of search, and the other is the industry must measure the cost overhead in the right way.\"</p><p>For years, researchers at Alphabet have been studying how to train and run large AI language models at a cheaper cost. AI is still too expensive to use in the hands of millions of consumers, according to a senior technology executive in the industry. \"These AI models are very expensive to run and maintain, so the next stage of the industry's advancement will be to reduce the cost of training these AI models and running inference so that we can use them in every application.\"</p><p>A person familiar with the matter said that at present, researchers inside OpenAI have found ways to optimize the inference cost through complex code, so that the chip can run more efficiently. But a spokesperson for OpenAI did not immediately comment.</p><p>Among them, a long-term question is how to reduce the number of parameters in an AI model by a factor of 10 or even 100 without losing accuracy.</p><p>\"How to most effectively weed out (parameters) remains an open question,\" notes Naveen Rao, who was responsible for<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/INTC\">Intel</a>The AI chip division, is now working to reduce the computing costs of AI through his startup, Mosaic ML.</p><p>In addition, some enterprises are also considering charging for access. For example, OpenAI has added a monthly subscription service of $20 to provide users with better ChatGPT services. Technology experts also say that one solution is to apply simpler AI models to simpler tasks, which Alphabet is exploring.</p><p>The company said this month that a \"simple model\" version of its massive LaMDA AI technology will give its chatbot \"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BCR\">Bud</a>\"Empowerment,\" the computing power required will be greatly reduced, enabling it to reach more users \".</p><p>Asked about running AI chatbots like ChatGPT and \"Bud,\" Hennessy said using a more targeted technology model, rather than providing all services in one system, would help \"reduce costs.\"</p><p></body></html></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> source：<a href=\"http://www.zhitongcaijing.com/content/detail/881216.html\">智通财经</a></p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/14917152d2c4d31343535b94729653a9","relate_stocks":{"BK4573":"虚拟现实","LU0648001328.SGD":"Natixis Harris Associates US Equity RA SGD","IE00BSNM7G36.USD":"NEUBERGER BERMAN SYSTEMATIC GLOBAL SUSTAINABLE VALUE \"A\" (USD) ACC","BK4581":"高盛持仓","BK4543":"AI","LU0109392836.USD":"富兰克林科技股A","LU0456855351.SGD":"JPMorgan Funds - Global Equity A (acc) SGD","IE0034235188.USD":"PINEBRIDGE GLOBAL FOCUS EQUITY \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU0053666078.USD":"摩根大通基金-美国股票A（离岸）美元","LU0127658192.USD":"EASTSPRING INVESTMENTS GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY \"A\" (USD) ACC","BK4576":"AR","LU0719512351.SGD":"JPMorgan Funds - US Technology A (acc) SGD","BK4533":"AQR资本管理(全球第二大对冲基金)","LU1803068979.SGD":"FTIF - Franklin Technology A (acc) SGD-H1","SG9999017495.SGD":"UGDP UNITED GLOBAL QUALITY GROWTH \"B\" (SGD) ACC","LU0061474960.USD":"天利环球焦点基金AU Acc","LU0158827948.USD":"ALLIANZ GLOBAL SUSTAINABILITY \"A\" (USD) INC","IE00BJJMRY28.SGD":"Janus Henderson Balanced A Inc SGD","LU0557290698.USD":"施罗德环球可持续增长基金","BK4516":"特朗普概念","LU2237443978.SGD":"Aberdeen Standard SICAV I - Global Dynamic Dividend A Acc SGD-H","LU0528227936.USD":"富达环球人口趋势基金A-ACC","LU0672654240.SGD":"FTIF - Franklin US Opportunities A Acc SGD-H1","SG9999018865.SGD":"United Global Quality Growth Fd Cl Dist SGD-H","SG9999014914.USD":"UNITED GLOBAL QUALITY GROWTH (USDHDG) INC","LU0061475181.USD":"THREADNEEDLE (LUX) AMERICAN \"AU\" (USD) ACC","IE00B3S45H60.SGD":"Neuberger Berman US Multicap Opportunities A Acc SGD-H","LU0316494557.USD":"FRANKLIN GLOBAL FUNDAMENTAL STRATEGIES \"A\" ACC","LU0289961442.SGD":"SUSTAINABLE GLOBAL THEMATIC PORTFOLIO \"AX\" (SGD) ACC","LU1839511570.USD":"WELLS FARGO GLOBAL FACTOR ENHANCED EQUITY \"I\" (USD) ACC","LU0170899867.USD":"EASTSPRING INVESTMENTS WORLD VALUE EQUITY  \"A\" (USD) ACC","IE00BJJMRX11.SGD":"Janus Henderson Balanced A Acc SGD","BK4579":"人工智能","LU0708995401.HKD":"FRANKLIN U.S. OPPORTUNITIES \"A\" (HKD) ACC","BK4588":"碎股","LU0072462426.USD":"贝莱德全球配置 A2","GOOGL":"谷歌A","GOOG":"谷歌","BK4507":"流媒体概念","LU0889565833.HKD":"FRANKLIN TECHNOLOGY \"A\" (HKD) ACC","LU0011850046.USD":"贝莱德全球长线股票 A2 USD","LU0882574139.USD":"富达环球消费行业基金A ACC","LU0957791311.USD":"THREADNEEDLE (LUX) GLOBAL FOCUS \"ZU\" (USD) ACC","LU1201861249.SGD":"Natixis Harris Associates US Equity PA SGD-H","LU0061474705.USD":"THREADNEEDLE (LUX) GLOBAL DYNAMIC REAL RETURN \"AU\" (USD) ACC","LU0256863811.USD":"ALLIANZ US EQUITY \"A\" INC","MSFT":"微软","LU0648000940.SGD":"Natixis Harris Associates Global Equity RA SGD","LU0097036916.USD":"贝莱德美国增长A2 USD"},"source_url":"http://www.zhitongcaijing.com/content/detail/881216.html","is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2313835177","content_text":"Alphabet在谷歌搜索中加入生成性人工智能(generative artificial intelligence)的尝试给行业带来了一个全新的挑战：成本问题。整个科技行业的高管都在讨论如何运营像ChatGPT这样的人工智能，并平衡其高昂的维护费用。OpenAI的首席执行官Sam Altman表示，ChatGPT可以自主回答搜索问题，每次对话的计算成本为几美分或更多，这一高额的使用费用数据“令人瞠目”。Alphabet的董事长John Hennessy表示，实现中，与被称为大型语言模型的AI进行交流的成本可能是标准关键字搜索的10倍，尽管代码优化将有助于快速降低成本。分析师表示，即使有潜在的基于聊天的搜索广告收入，使用该技术也可能会增加数十亿美元的额外使用成本，从而影响Alphabet的利润。该公司2022年实现的净收入为接近600亿美元。摩根士丹利估计，谷歌去年的3.3万亿次搜索查询每次的花费大约为五分之一美分，但这个数字在今年将会增加，具体取决于AI必须生成的文本长度。例如，分析师预测，如果像ChatGPT这样的人工智能能够以50个字以内的回复处理一半的问询量来计算，到2024年，谷歌的费用支出将增加近60亿美元。其他企业也以不同的方式达成了类似的结论。例如，专注于芯片技术的研究和咨询公司Semi Analysis表示，将ChatGPT类似的人工智能添加到搜索引擎中可能会令Alphabet的支出增加30亿美元，具体数额受到谷歌内部芯片Tensor处理单元(TPU)以及其他优化的限制。令这种人工智能比传统搜索方式更昂贵的是其所涉及的计算能力。分析人士表示，这种人工智能的运行是基于数十亿美元的芯片，其成本必须在芯片几年的使用寿命内得到消化。同样，电力消耗也增加了碳足迹目标公司的成本和压力。处理人工智能搜索查询的过程被称为“推理”，在这个过程中，“神经网络”模拟了人类大脑的生物学思维方式，能不断的从先前的训练中推断出搜索问题的答案。相比之下，在传统的搜索方式中，谷歌的网络爬虫会扫描存储了互联网以编制信息索引。当用户键入查询时，谷歌会提供存储在索引中的最相关答案。Alphabet的Hennessy表示，“必须降低运行AI“推理”过程的成本开销”，并称这是近两年行业的共同“难题”。据悉，尽管代价高昂，Alphabet仍面临着竞争对手挑战的压力。本月早些时候，微软(MSFT.US)宣布了将人工智能聊天技术嵌入其必应搜索引擎的计划，据Similarweb估计，微软瞄准了谷歌91%的搜索市场份额。微软首席财务官Amy Hood称，随着新的必应搜索向数百万消费者推出，用户和广告的收入将覆盖超过了成本支出。“这对我们来说，即使是以服务成本为代价，但能给公司业务毛利率提供增量”。谷歌的另一个竞争对手、搜索引擎You.com的首席执行官Richard Socher也表示，添加人工智能聊天体验以及图表、视频和其他生成技术的应用程序，会使企业的成本费用增加30%至50%。但其指出：“随着时间的推移，使用AI技术的成本会越来越低。”另一方面，一位接近谷歌的消息人士警告称，现在准确确定AI聊天机器人的成本开销还为时过早，主要由于效率和使用情况因所涉及的技术仍有很大差异。埃森哲首席技术官Paul Daugherty表示，科技行业内拥有数十亿用户的搜索和社交媒体巨头没有在一夜之间推出AI聊天机器人的主要原因之一就是支付成本账单的问题。他指出：“一是搜索的准确度，二是行业必须以正确的方式来衡量成本开销的问题。”多年来，Alphabet的研究人员一直在研究如何以更廉价的成本训练和运行大型AI语言模型。一位行业内高级技术主管表示，人工智能在数百万消费者手中的使用成本仍然过高。“这些AI模型的运行维护非常昂贵，因此行业下一阶段的推进将是降低训练这些AI模型和运行推理的成本，以便我们可以在每个应用程序中使用。”一位知情人士表示，目前，OpenAI内部的研究人员已经找到了如何通过复杂的代码优化推理成本的方法，从而使芯片更高效地运行。但OpenAI的发言人没有立即置评。其中，一个长远的问题是如何在不损失准确性的情况下，将人工智能模型中的参数数量减少10倍甚至100倍。“如何最有效地剔除(参数)，这仍然是一个悬而未决的问题，”Naveen Rao指出，其曾负责英特尔的人工智能芯片部门，现在正通过他的初创公司Mosaic ML致力于降低人工智能的计算成本。此外，有企业也正考虑对访问收费，例如OpenAI增加了每月20美元的订阅服务，以为用户提供更好的ChatGPT服务。技术专家还表示，一种解决方法是将较简单的人工智能模型应用于更简单的任务，而Alphabet正在探索这一点。该公司本月表示，其大规模LaMDA人工智能技术的“简单模型”版本将为其聊天机器人“巴德”赋能，“所需的计算能力将大大降低，使其能够覆盖到更多用户”。当被问及运行像ChatGPT和“巴德”这样的AI聊天机器人时，Hennessy表示，使用更有针对性的技术模型，而不是在一个系统提供所有服务，将有助于“降低成本”。","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"GOOGL":0.9,"MSFT":0.68,"GOOG":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":692,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9955553080,"gmtCreate":1675597655541,"gmtModify":1676539008746,"author":{"id":"3576892531232178","authorId":"3576892531232178","name":"uiv","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/522ae5f11b7bc763293c30c3a20671c9","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576892531232178","authorIdStr":"3576892531232178"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👌🏻","listText":"👌🏻","text":"👌🏻","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9955553080","repostId":"1192151009","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1192151009","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1675569606,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1192151009?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2023-02-05 12:00","market":"us","language":"zh","title":"Apple Core-making: Fail, hibernate, accumulate power, and then beat everyone","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1192151009","media":"远川研究所","summary":"2010年1月，癌症晚期的乔布斯在第一代iPad发布会上，首次向世人展示了苹果自研的A4芯片。这枚45nm制程的芯片由三星代工，内置ARM的Cortex-A8内核，拥有1GHz的运行频率，性能突出。尽","content":"<p><html><head></head><body>In January 2010, Jobs, who was in the terminal stage of cancer, showed Apple's self-developed A4 chip to the world for the first time at the launch of the first generation iPad.</p><p>This 45nm chip is manufactured by Samsung, with built-in ARM's Cortex-A8 core, a running frequency of 1GHz and outstanding performance. Despite its historical significance, at the more than an hour-long iPad launch conference, Jobs only used a few words to talk about the A4 chip, which added up to less than 20 seconds.</p><p>This is a deliberate low-key. Before the press conference, Apple kept a tight lip on its self-developed chips, which is related to the history of Apple's core-making: as one of the most important popularizers of microcomputers, Apple started almost at the same time as integrated circuit technology. In the more than 30 years since its establishment, it charged the chips several times, but the result was repeated defeats.</p><p>Sure enough, the sensitive media smelled the clues, and most of them mocked Apple's self-developed chip. It was generally believed that \"A4 chip referred to Samsung's design, and Apple shamelessly posted its own brand\".</p><p>Ars Technica, a technology media outlet, believes that the A4 design is mediocre and \"nothing worth writing about\".</p><p>Rationally, it is indeed difficult for Apple to develop its own mobile phone chips. In 2010, the mobile chip market was already full of giants: Qualcomm's Snapdragon swept through the army, Samsung's Exynos was ready to go, Nvidia's Tegra was ambitious, and even Intel's Atom felt it could do it, trying to get a piece of the pie.</p><p>But people underestimated Apple's determination to pry open the iron plate: a year later, Apple showed off the second-generation chip A5 at the iPhone 4S conference. The CPU performance was twice that of A4, and the GPU performance was nine times that of A4. The performance improvement was huge, which made the industry realize the fact that Apple had indeed gotten the expensive ticket to the commanding heights of semiconductors.</p><p>Unfortunately, Jobs, the layout maker, failed to witness the next story. He died shortly after watching the live broadcast of A5's appearance in his hospital bed.</p><p>Ten years later, Apple has built a semiconductor empire that includes multiple product lines such as A-series (mobile phones & tablets), M-series (desktop PCs), H-series (headphones), S-series (watches), and especially when Cook showed people the M1 chip to replace Intel in late 2020, people felt an indescribable shock.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a0ae07d364781d0bc5c7968db4eb0261\" tg-width=\"550\" tg-height=\"550\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/>Apple M1 Chip</p><p>After 2000, the stories of two new entrants in the chip industry are the most tortuous, one is Huawei HiSilicon and the other is Apple Silicon. The former presents the tragic style of Zhang patrolling Suiyang, while the latter is more like a Homer epic depicting Odysseus'return home. Both of them have more or less changed the rhythm of the Sino-US science and technology war.</p><p>Apple core-making is a continuous history, bounded by A4, and the stories of before and after are all playful: before A4, Apple was a bamboo basket and defeated repeatedly; After A4, Apple is the God who blocks the God and the Buddha who blocks the Buddha. Samsung, Qualcomm and Intel, the top chip players in the world, are either defeated or abandoned by Apple.</p><p>It's a story about business, but more so about the \"science\" of computers.</p><p><b>Butterfly wings for $150</b></p><p>Many years later, in the face of the M1 chip, Steve Wozniak may be reminded of the distant night when he first met the Intel 8080.</p><p>As Apple's co-founder, Wozniak saw the Altair 8800, which appeared on the cover of the January issue of Popular Electronics and claimed to be the first personal computer, and the Intel 8080 chip that powered it at a \"Homebrew Computer Club\" gathering in 1975, a year before Apple was founded.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/27a4535f885a7f6e655d74edfadda6f8\" tg-width=\"477\" tg-height=\"417\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/>Magazine cover with Altair 8800</p><p>Since humans entered the era of transistors and integrated circuits in the late 1950s, the size of electronic computers has been decreasing at a rate visible to the naked eye every year. The process is being driven by a young Silicon Valley, with countless emerging companies competing in the hot land. By the 1970s, computers were only a few layers of window paper away from entering ordinary people's homes.</p><p>Altair 8800 is recognized as igniting the microcomputer revolution. It inspired Bill Gates and Paul Allen to launch the first product in Microsoft's history, the BASIC programming language, and also gave Wozniak the idea of assembling a computer himself. The only problem is that Intel 8080 is too expensive.</p><p>An assembled Altair 8800 costs $621, but the bulk 8080 costs $170. Wozniak described it as \"more expensive than my month's rent\", so he started looking for a replacement: first he found a Motorola 6800, which he bought through an acquaintance for only $40/piece, and later he found a big-name replacement for the 6800, the MOS 6502 made by MOS Technologies, which can be picked up for $20.</p><p>When Wozniak showed the assembled microcomputer to Jobs, the latter was taken aback and realized that it could be a great business opportunity. Jobs is also very satisfied with Wozniak's abandonment of Intel chips. He believes that \"technology is only a means, and ultimately it is to improve the consumer experience.\"</p><p>This microcomputer powered by a $20 cheap chip is Apple's first generation product, the Apple I. And so, the Apple story begins.</p><p>This year, Jobs was 20, Wozniak was 25, the computer world was still dominated by IBM mainframes, Altair was still a toy for geeks, and Intel was still struggling to survive the first recession of the silicon cycle. Two Steves can't realize that the $150 saved on chips will cost tens of millions of times to make up in the future.</p><p>In 1977, Apple launched its first full-blown product, the Apple II, and sales skyrocketed. It is shown by its beautiful appearance and built-in keyboard, and Wozniak's programming skills and Jobs's design aesthetics are vividly reflected. But these longboards mask a problem: The Apple II is still using the cheap MOS 6502 processor.</p><p>At the end of 1981, the CPU of Apple's Apple III was still this old 6502, while its competitor IBM had already used Intel's 8088 chip, and its performance was about 10 times that of the 8080 abandoned by Wozniak. Simple comparison: MOS 6502 has just over 3,000 transistors, while Intel 8088 has a whopping 29,000.</p><p>Cheap but \"sufficient\" chips can keep Apple with an extremely high gross profit margin, but the premise is that hardware won't become a shortcoming, at least it can't hold back software. Apparently, the 6502 chip, born in 1975, struggled to support 1980s computers, and frequently malfunctioning circuit boards and slow running speeds eventually made Apple III sales dismal.</p><p>Pressure from competitors is also mounting. In 1981, IBM changed its usual bulky figure and launched a compatible personal computer (also known as IBM PC) using Microsoft MS-DOS and Intel 8088, which was a great success, and pulled almost all personal computer manufacturers except Apple into the \"Microsoft + Intel\" camp.</p><p>At that time, Intel had not yet transformed into toothpaste. At the same time, the release of chip performance followed Moore's Law. 8080 was launched in 1974, 8086 was launched in 1978, 80186 and 80286 were launched in 1982, and then 80386, 80486 and the epoch-making Pentium-whose Chinese name has become the memory of a whole generation: Pentium.</p><p>However, after missing it in the early days, it is difficult for Jobs to re-enter Intel's arms with his character, especially since Intel is already the core backbone of the hostile camp.</p><p>Fortunately, there were many companies in Silicon Valley that could wrestle arms with Intel at that time, and Motorola was one of them. In 1976, Intel was developing 16-bit 8086 internally. After Motorola learned about it, it decided to do a big one directly-since you do 16-bit, I will go directly to 32-bit. After four years of research and development, Motorola launched the powerful Motorola 68000 chip in 1980.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/add711b1e6e8c1bec085772e275d6c25\" tg-width=\"550\" tg-height=\"213\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/>Motorola 68000 Chip</p><p>68000 chip, also known as \"68k\", means that there are 68,000 transistors inside the chip, and its performance is about twice that of Intel 8086 (and more expensive), so it is widely used in high-end machines of HP, Sun and DEC and game consoles with high performance requirements. For Jobs, who is eager to seek new chips but doesn't want to commit himself to Intel, it is even more drought.</p><p>Therefore, Macintosh (that is, the first generation Mac), a new product that decided Apple's fate, decided to use 68000 chips. Project manager Jef Raskin originally wanted to use Motorola 6809, which had low performance but was cheap, but it was rejected by Jobs, who suffered a loss, and personally cut the wholesale price of 68k from $125/piece to $35/piece.</p><p>On January 24, 1984, a generation of classic Macintosh was officially released. The commercial \"1984\" directed by the director of \"Blade Runner\" packaged Apple as a rebel against IBM Orwellian rule, which stunned everyone, and Jobs also shed tears at the press conference. The advent of Mac has left the deepest imprint on the PC revolution wave in the 1980s.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1d69c8713a519dae632e74255977b2f0\" tg-width=\"436\" tg-height=\"572\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/>Jobs releasing the first Macintosh, 1984</p><p>The 68000 chip does live up to expectations, and its strong performance strongly supports the dazzling graphical interface and convenient mouse operation. But the first-generation Mac dropped the chain in other ways, such as only 128K of memory, and the later upgrade to 512k was still not enough (at least 1000K needed). After the hot sale in the early stage of sale, the sales of Mac, which was once praised as \"the perfect combination of computer technology and art\", dropped sharply because of its slow running speed.</p><p>In the spring of 1985, Jobs, who tried to remove CEO Sculley, was pushed out of the company by the latter, and the joint board of directors.</p><p>Jobs left, but the 68,000 chips he selected at that time were continued to be entrusted with important tasks. From 1985 to 1994, subsequent versions of the Mac all used the 680x0 family of chips, from 68000 to 68060. Motorola's 680x0 family was also one of the few forces that could compete with Intel's 80x86 family at that time.</p><p>Not joining the Intel x86 architecture camp allowed Apple to avoid being reduced to the role of working for \"Intel Inside\"-a role that was finally played by HP, Dell and Lenovo. But this choice also brings potential hidden dangers to Apple: When Intel is racing along Moore's Law, can Motorola, a thin dog, do it?</p><p>In fact, although the 680x0 family chips are not inferior to Intel's 80x86 family in some performances, Intel crushed Motorola in terms of shipments. At that time, the chip industry was basically IDM vertical integration mode, and design, manufacturing, packaging and testing were grasped. There was a rule in this mode: economies of scale caused by heavy assets.</p><p>For example: If both chip companies A and B produce a certain type, A is the leader in the industry and B is the second, A produces 1 million pieces and B produces 300,000 pieces, will B's profit be 30% of A's? The answer is no. Not only does it not reach 30%, but it may not even reach 3%. It is more likely that A makes money and B loses money.</p><p>A CPU may only cost $30, but the fixed cost (R&D investment and production line) may cost hundreds of millions of dollars. The more chips you make, the lower the cost shared on each chip. The gap between Intel x86 architecture chips and Motorola 680x0 family chips is far bigger than the gap between 1 million and 300,000 chips.</p><p>This makes it increasingly difficult for Motorola to keep up with the pace, and the development of new chips is often delayed. For example, the 68040, which was originally planned to be released in 1989, dragged on for a whole year, almost overturning Apple's new products. But Apple had no choice but to serve Motorola carefully and enjoy the distress of being controlled by others.</p><p>Fortunately or unfortunately, Jobs has no chance to be on the front line to solve these problems. In the next decade, as a bystander, he will witness Apple falling into an a vicious circle that is tired of coping with the \"Intel + Microsoft\" camp, trying to make cores but repeatedly losing, and finally eroding its market share step by step.</p><p>No one knows what would have happened if Woz had chosen Intel, but there is no doubt that the $150 saved must have been the butterfly wings that changed some of the course of history.</p><p><b>The desperate 90s</b></p><p>In 1981, when both Steves were still at Apple, two people named David in California did a far-reaching job.</p><p>In 1981, University of California Berkeley professor David Patterson and PhD student David Ditzel published \"The Case for a Reduced Instruction Set Computer.\" In this paper, the Chinese translation of Reduced Instruction Set Computer is \"Reduced Instruction Set Computer\", and its initial letter is taken as an abbreviation, which will become famous in the future-RISC.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/67daa7ca92ebf56537cb7d51de6542e6\" tg-width=\"550\" tg-height=\"314\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/>David Patterson (left) and Carlo Séquin, 1981</p><p>There is a \"reduced instruction computer\", and there is a \"complex instruction computer\", that is, CISC. The difference between the two can be simply understood as that in the processor adopting RISC design concept, the instructions are shorter, the length is uniform and the speed is faster; However, the instructions in the processor with CISC design concept are mostly long and complex, and the running efficiency is low.</p><p>In the era when microprocessors first came out (the world's first commercial microprocessor was Intel's 4004, which was launched in 1971), designers usually needed to rack their brains to balance cost and performance, and the defects of instruction set design were ignored. Therefore, early mainstream microprocessors, including Intel 8080 and Motorola 68k, can be classified as CISC architectures.</p><p>This is the background of this paper. They redefine a new approach to CPU design, RISC, and classify any processor that does not meet the RISC philosophy as CISC. This makes Intel very frustrated. After all, no one wants people to sit at home, but a \"complicated\" hat comes from the sky.</p><p>While Intel is unhappy, Apple, which has been trying to find a breaking point, seems to have grasped the straw.</p><p>In the late 1980s, the IBM compatible machine camp (IBM, HP, Dell, etc.) also used Microsoft's graphical operating system-Windows, which gradually squeezed Apple into the corner. Although it is still strong in several high-end fields such as desktop publishing, Apple must constantly improve its hardware performance to hold the last one-third acre of land, and chips are obviously a good breakthrough.</p><p>After the concept of RISC was put forward, Silicon Valley responded positively, and Stanford's MIPS, Sun's SPARC, DEC's Alpha and other projects all achieved a certain degree of success. This makes Apple think \"I can do it\", and Motorola's chip supply often rolls over, so Apple's management waves its hand: make its own chips.</p><p>To be safe, Apple chose to cooperate with the operator AT&T, and successively launched two RISC projects: Aquarius project and Hobbit project. The former wanted to replace Motorola 68000 as the main chip of Mac; The latter is intended to be used on the Newton handheld computer under development.</p><p>Unfortunately, Apple has no experience in the field of chip design after all, and AT&T is no longer the AT&T that commands the world by Bell Labs. Together, the two stooges can't make up half of Zhuge Liang, and Aquarius and Hobbit have failed one after another, and tens of millions of dollars of R&D funds have been wasted.</p><p>During this period, Intel x86 architecture continued to make great progress, and even humbly learned the RISC concept. In 1989, when the Aquarius project was put on hold, Intel introduced the 32-bit 80486, which used RISC technology for the first time in the x86 series of chips; In 1993, Intel launched the Pentium processor, which began its long-term monopoly on the CPU market.</p><p>Apple attributes the failure of Aquarius and Hobbit to the incompetence of their partners. Therefore, in 1990, Apple chose stronger allies to make cores together-old enemy IBM and old friend Motorola, which formed the most watched \"AIM Alliance\" (Apple, IBM, Motorola) in the PC industry that year.</p><p>IBM and Motorola each have their own thoughts: after several years of compatible PC, IBM found that it couldn't beat the rising stars of Dell and Compaq at all, and regretted that it outsourced PC chips to Intel; Motorola's appeal is even simpler: fighting Intel alone is about the same as riding Yadi to chase Audi, which is really unbearable.</p><p>The new alliance is full of confidence. IBM started RISC technology reserve very early (even before David Patterson put forward RISC). In 1980s, it successfully developed high-end chips based on RISC POWER architecture, dominating the field of servers and workstations. The plan of this cooperation is to \"sink\" the POWER architecture into the PC.</p><p>Although Motorola is not very reliable, it has experience in consumer chip development. In addition, Apple could sell more than 1.3 million (1990) terminal computers every year at that time, ensuring that the purchase of new chips could break through the scale line of breakeven. Therefore, the AIM Alliance's decisive battle with Intel can be described as 800,000 versus 600,000, and the advantage is mine.</p><p>In this way, the AIM Alliance was launched in 1990, and the new chip was named: PowerPC-the letter \"PC\" was added after IBM's original word POWER. The development of the first chip, PowerPC 601, officially started in October 1991, and it took 21 months to complete, and mass production began in July 1993.</p><p>It is worth mentioning that \"core changing\" is an extremely complicated project, which probably needs to accomplish three things: First, rewrite the underlying code of the operating system, which is a huge amount of engineering; The second is to get the code converter to ensure that the new chip is compatible with the previous software; The third is to provide software developers with new development tools and persuade them to use them.</p><p>When PowerPC 601 was still under development, Apple's engineers were already in full swing to prepare and successfully completed most of the work before the chip was mass-produced. Saving these \"heart transplant\" experiences is very important for Apple, because although this is its first \"core change\", it is definitely not the last.</p><p>In March 1994, the first generation of Mac equipped with PowerPC chip was released in Manhattan, and Apple finally successfully changed its core, which also meant the curtain call of Motorola's 68000 series.</p><p>The media did not hesitate to praise it. MacWorld evaluates: \"Apple recaptures performance leadership it lost 8 years ago\".</p><p>Consumer feedback is also very positive, with 150,000 units sold in the pre-sale stage alone; In January 1995, sales exceeded 1 million units; By mid-1995, the Power Mac had replaced almost all previous models equipped with Motorola's 680x0 family of chips.</p><p>After changing the core, Apple frequently compared Intel's chips in the same period: in 1997, Apple claimed that the performance of PowerPC G3 was twice that of Pentium II in the same period; In 1999, Apple claimed that the PowerPC G4 was 2.94 times the Pentium III of the same period; In 2003, Apple claimed that PowerPC G5 was even more powerful than Pentium 4-this \"far ahead\" tone, even Mr. Yu Chengdong called it an expert.</p><p>Is the Wintel camp scared silly? No. Instead, their coping strategy is: you hit yours, I hit mine. Where does this confidence come from?</p><p>Confidence comes from the laws of the industry. As mentioned in the previous chapter, the asset-heavy IDM model led to the scale effect of chips. Just like when the 680x0 family fought fiercely, x86 chips always pressed each other in terms of cost, and even their advantages were expanding-Intel's market share was 50% in 1985, and it had exceeded 80% in 1995.</p><p>Without scale, there is no profit; Without profits, there cannot be sufficient funds to improve product defects. Because PowerPC comes from the \"sinking\" of IBM server and workstation chips, it inevitably has the problems of high power consumption and high heat generation, but the AIM Alliance, which is stretched out of funds, has never been able to solve it.</p><p>For example, PowerPC G5, which claims to beat Pentium 4 in performance, has extremely high power consumption and huge heat generation. Apple has to redesign the chassis structure to accommodate a huge radiator, and the high-end version even needs to install a water cooling system, which makes many people in the industry ridicule crazily: this goods has the guts to call themselves RISC?</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2ad0be5c9dbb55ba0b4329077ad5f762\" tg-width=\"550\" tg-height=\"526\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/>The enormous size of the PowerPC G5 chip</p><p>When it comes to product defects, there are many problems in x86 architecture, such as complex instructions, few registers and high power consumption. However, with its strong financial strength, Intel improved the architectural defects with one hand and smashed the process technology with the other hand, which not only blocked the RISC camp from the mainstream of PC, but also eaten away the share of servers and HPC (high-performance computers).</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bf5d3347f4d2438256d6130944d14047\" tg-width=\"550\" tg-height=\"329\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/>Intel's market share in PC, data center, HPC</p><p>Software ecology is an insurmountable gap. One story is: Adobe, the imaging software giant, made its fortune on Apple, and the first generation of Photoshop was only released on Mac systems. In 1993, Adobe's focus turned to Windows. After Jobs returned, he asked Adobe to develop more software for Mac, such as Premiere. As a result, because too few users were rejected in person, Jobs never forgave Adobe until his death.</p><p>In the 1990s, the WinTel Alliance has entered a virtuous circle of self-strengthening: large shipments → dilution of CapEx → purchase by many manufacturers → prosperity of software ecology → consumer recognition → shipments continue to increase greatly. After PowerPC has made certain achievements with IBM's technical background and the advanced nature of RISC, it still can't break this cycle, nor can it build its own cycle.</p><p>Evaluating the success of a CPU mainly depends on three points: architecture, process and software ecology. The architecture depends on innate heredity, the process depends on acquired efforts, and the software ecology depends on vertical and horizontal integration. RISC architecture does give PowerPC some innate advantages, but the shortcomings of the latter two are really too big. AIM Alliance has been busy for a long time and found that it is still riding Yadi.</p><p>Is there really no breaking point left? Actually, there are. History tells us that no matter how strong commercial barriers and moats are, they can't dominate the rivers and lakes for thousands of years. However, the breaking point that Apple is looking for is not in itself, but in two names that were not famous at that time: one is TSMC and the other is ARM.</p><p>The latter is precisely a seed planted by Apple in the desperate 1990s.</p><p><b>If you can't beat him, surrender?</b></p><p>Silicon Valley has long been famous all over the world, but what is not well known is that there is a low-profile version of Silicon Valley in Britain-Silicon Fen.</p><p>Silicon Marsh refers to an area surrounding Cambridgeshire in England, given its eccentric name because it is located at the southern tip of a swamp (Fenlands) on the British Island. This is about equal to Zhangjiang in Shanghai or Yuehai Street in Shenzhen, where a large number of high-tech companies gather, the most famous of which is Arm, which was founded in 1990.</p><p>The birth of Arm is also closely related to the RISC wave. As early as 1983, Acorn Computer, the predecessor of ARM, was inspired by Professor Berkeley Patterson's RISC paper, and wanted to design a chip based on RISC concept, so it started a project named Acorn RISC Machine, whose acronym is ARM.</p><p>Acorn had no manufacturing capacity, so it commissioned VLSI Technology, an American company, and successfully produced the core in 1985. Later, Apple's engineers looked for a replacement for Motorcycle 68000. Once, they used ARM2 chip to run Mac software in a simulated 68000 environment, and found that it actually ran faster than 68000, so they listed ARM as an alternative.</p><p>By the late 1980s, the Hobbit project between Apple and AT&T ran aground, so ARM chip became the main chip of the sinkhole project \"Newton Pocket Computer\". Apple wanted to simply turn the spare tire into a regular company, so it proposed to Acorn to set up a joint venture company, on the condition that Acorn must transfer all ARM's intellectual property rights and 12 core employees to the new company.</p><p>Acorn's store has a small profit, so it naturally agreed, and VLSI, which is the foundry for ARM chips, said it also wanted to get on the bus. So in 1990, the three companies set up a joint venture company, with Apple investing $3 million to account for 30% of the shares (later rising to 43%). The new company was called Advanced RISC Machine (changed a word), and the abbreviation was still ARM.</p><p>Compared with Apple, which is gradually in trouble, ARM is doing more and more smoothly. With low-power chip technology and special business model (licensing chip architecture to other companies), ARM achieved profitability in 1993, completed its listing in 1998, and its stock price soared by the technology stock bubble in the late 1990s.</p><p>Therefore, after Jobs returned to Apple in 1997, he was pleasantly surprised to find that Sculley actually left him such a generous gift.</p><p>The twists and turns of Jobs' 12 years of expulsion from Apple (1985-1997) will not be repeated in this article. Apple's PC market share had fallen from 16% to 4% in 1997, when NeXT, the company he founded, was acquired by Apple and Jobs returned as a special adviser. By 1996, Apple had lost $1 billion, and the cash on its books was once enough to last three months of operation.</p><p>And Jobs has changed tremendously. Since 1985, he has witnessed the decline of Apple, Intel's domination, the struggle of AIM alliance, and Gates, who was far less famous than him in the past, as the richest man in the world; He lived through the death of his father and had a happy family life. Although he was still unruly, he was much more pragmatic.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ca5609620190201b3d97f3423a9bd8b5\" tg-width=\"550\" tg-height=\"438\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/>Middle-aged, slightly fat Steve Jobs, 1997</p><p>For example, after returning as CEO, Jobs called Gates at the first time and begged Microsoft to invest $150 million in Apple and continue to develop Mac versions of Word and Excel. During the negotiations, Jobs lowered his stature, said all the good things, and even promised to use Microsoft's IE browser as the default browser of Mac-anyone who has used IE understands how humiliating this is.</p><p>Then Jobs cut most of Apple's product lines drastically, reducing the number of models from hundreds to less than 10 models, and laid off more than 3,000 people. Among the cut-off projects, it included the \"Newton\" handheld computer, which invested countless funds but sold extremely poorly. It was also the only project that Apple used ARM chips at that time.</p><p>For ARM, which is in the limelight, Jobs' decision is pragmatic enough to be somewhat cruel: sell stocks and save Apple's life.</p><p>It's not that Jobs can't see the value of ARM, but that after cutting off Newton, Apple has no products in the low-power scenario that ARM is good at. At this time, Apple's most important task is to continue its life, rather than continue to challenge Intel. In the end, Apple got hundreds of millions of dollars by reducing its holdings to transfuse blood for its own research and development.</p><p>In 1998, Apple released the breakthrough iMac, which was a great success, and drove Apple to successfully turn losses that year, with a profit of 309 million US dollars; In 2001, Apple released the iPod, a 1,000-song player that instantly took the world by storm, and by 2007, more than 100 million iPod units had been sold. Apple is completely renewed.</p><p>After dealing with the survival problem, Jobs can free up his energy to think: How to solve the increasingly serious chip problem of Mac?</p><p>As mentioned in the previous chapter, PowerPC chips have become increasingly difficult to parry Intel's x86 family after experiencing the amazement when they were first born. After Jobs returned, he had a big quarrel with Galvin, CEO of Motorola, who is in charge of manufacturing PowerPC. On the phone, he finally couldn't help but curse: Motorola's chips suck.</p><p>Since then, Jobs has secretly plotted the launch of the AIM Alliance. However, Apple's repeated defeats in core-making experience let him know that it is tantamount to suicide to engage in chips when the conditions are immature. So he made a very pragmatic, but surprising suggestion to the board: Or maybe let's buy Intel chips.</p><p>Apple's board discussed it for 18 months and finally agreed. After the last time, we switched to changing the core after all. If Apple says that it is second, who dares to say first?</p><p>In order to sell products, Jobs had to continue to brazenly brag about PowerPC's chips in public. For example, in 2003, when he commented on the upcoming PowerPC G5, he said, \"PowerPC G5 gives us the fastest desktop computer in the world... This is the beginning of our long-term and efficient cooperation (with IBM and Motorola).\"</p><p>But the chip problem can't be dragged on any longer. At the beginning of 2001, Apple released the PowerBook equipped with PowerPC G4 chip. After that, it failed to upgrade the chip for five years (the Intel camp upgraded it every year), and its sales became worse year by year. The reason was that the subsequent PowerPC G5 chip couldn't fit in because of heat dissipation problems.</p><p>Starting in 2004, Apple began the second core change in its history. Intel CEO Paul Otellini raised his feet in favor. After all, as the standard-bearer of the anti-Wintel camp for a long time, Jobs announced the adoption of Intel chips, which is about equivalent to Dong Mingzhu announcing one day that Gree would buy an air-conditioning compressor from Fang Hongbo of the United States.</p><p>Intel sent a lean team to work with Apple and successfully completed the code modification of all the underlying operating systems within a six-month deadline. And Apple engineers have also developed a translator called Rosetta to ensure that the software on PowerPC can run smoothly on Macs based on Intel x86 chips.</p><p>In 2005, Jobs publicly announced that Mac would switch to Intel camp, and some fruit powders who had followed for many years were very angry; When Jobs finally released the iMac and Macbook Pro based on Intel's new products in January 2006, when he saw that the performance of Macbook Pro was increased by 5 times and the battery life was increased by 2 hours compared with the previous PowerBook, the press conference instantly became a large-scale real fragrance scene.</p><p>Apple's second core change was successful. Ten years later, some media commented that Jobs turned to Intel, which was one of Apple's most successful ventures.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/31311dd7bd00acef3af3fc2db4f3f0e5\" tg-width=\"550\" tg-height=\"318\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/>Intel CEO Otellini delivers chips to Jobs, 2006</p><p>The ill-fated AIM alliance finally dissolved. Motorola, which heard the news in 2004, simply withdrew from the chip business, packaged and divested its assets to set up Freescale, focusing on automotive and embedded markets. And IBM also sold some of PowerPC's assets and kept the chip product line for game consoles-that's another story.</p><p>Apple's share in the desktop computer market (desktop + notebook), which has solved the problem of \"stuck neck\" of chips, has been rising, exceeding 10% in 2007, and the following story is familiar: Jobs released the iPhone in 2007, and Apple completely stepped onto the altar, gradually becoming the largest company in the world by market value.</p><p>When the original iPhone was developed, Jobs tried to strike while the iron was hot to persuade Intel to develop a mobile chip for Apple-before Intel had time to show the world their astonishing incompetence in the mobile field. But because the price was not agreed, Otellini recalled afterwards: Who would have thought that the sales volume of his mobile phone would be (expected) 100 times?</p><p>So Apple turned to Samsung. The first iPhone used Samsung's S5L8900 chip-strictly speaking, this is not a Chip, but a SoC System on Chip, consisting of an ARM architecture Chip and a PowerVR Chip, using a 90nm process, which is barely enough. * For readers' general understanding, we will still use chips to refer to SoCs later.</p><p>Samsung's semiconductor business started in 1990s, and was personally laid out by the second generation Li Jianxi. Through the \"counter-cyclical law\", it gradually became the boss of global memory chips. In 2006, Samsung entered the field of chip foundry, quickly caught up with TSMC in technology, and became the only supplier of iPhone chips through its self-developed S5L8900 chip.</p><p>But Jobs, who has suffered a big loss from a single supplier, has a lingering worry in his heart, that is: What if Samsung becomes the second Motorola and IBM? At the 2007 iPhone conference, Jobs quoted Alan Kay: People who really care about software should build their own hardware.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a443365d8e1f3ce17500b2209a5ebad6\" tg-width=\"550\" tg-height=\"367\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>Alan Kay Who is it? He is a Turing Award winner, an inventor of object-oriented programming, and he led the development of the first user graphical interface in history at Xerox PARC, directly inspiring Jobs 'Macintosh and Gates' Windows. Quoting Alan Kay, does it mean that Jobs has realized a new inspiration?</p><p>Perhaps, it's time to solve the chip problem altogether. But the question is: Apple has gone through such a long core acid past, will it be different this time?</p><p><b>Heroes gather together regardless of where they come from</b></p><p>Under the background of almost monopoly of giants, a new chip system needs a premise + three conditions if it wants to be built, sold well and used well.</p><p>One premise is that the high threshold caused by IDM mode must be lowered or even disintegrated in some way. As mentioned above, Motorola's 680x0 family and PowerPC both lost to the industrial law of \"scale effect of heavy assets\" in the end. If this high wall still stands in front of new players, it will be difficult for the new chip system to succeed.</p><p>What broke this high wall was the Foundry model. Especially after entering 2000, companies such as TSMC and Samsung successfully narrowed the gap with Intel, so that the Foundry model with general recognition before continued to grow. The status quo of IDM dominating the world was broken, and the division of labor appeared in the industrial chain, which greatly lowered the threshold for new entrants.</p><p>Or take the example in Chapter 1: If both A and B produce the same kind of chips, and A produces 1 million chips and B produces 300,000 chips, if both are in IDM mode, then the cost of B will always be much higher than that of A. However, if B finds C to OEM, and C can let B share the fixed cost with customers in the same process, such as D, E, F, etc., then B's cost may be close to or even equal to A's.</p><p>The rise of ARM has further lowered the cost of new entrants. Compared with manufacturing, although the design link of the chip costs less money, it is expensive and the success rate is very low to design a new CPU architecture from scratch. ARM's authorization mode and conscience charging have helped enterprises that want to own their own chips greatly reduce the design cost and further lower the threshold.</p><p>Simple summary: that is, IDM mode = design + manufacturing + packaging and testing. After being disassembled and divided into labor, ARM will help you lower the design cost, TSMC will help you lower the manufacturing cost, and the packaging and testing will be transferred to the mainland to reduce the cost. In this way, even if the amount of Apple chips is only 5% of Intel's, the cost of a single chip will not be much higher than that of Intel, and it may even be leveled.</p><p>Therefore, when TSMC and ARM successfully reconstructed the industrial chain after 2000, a large number of emerging Fabless (Fabless) chip companies rose up, Qualcomm began to enter the chip field with the authorization of ARM, and Nvidia relied on TSMC's foundry to make the first generation GeForce graphics card. Even AMD sold the factory in the end, all relying on foundry to fight with Intel until now.</p><p>There is a premise for Apple to return to coremaking. What are the three conditions? One is funds, the other is customers, and the third is teams.</p><p>The first is funding. After the restructuring of the industrial chain, the funds needed to make the core are actually abundant and frugal. If you get a 90nm embedded chip, millions can get on the bus; But if you want to build complex processor chips (which Apple wants to do), you can't start construction without $1 billion. Of course, for Apple after releasing the iPhone, they have forgotten how to write the word threshold.</p><p>The second is the customer. It is the first step to make the chip, the second step to sell it, and the third step to find the problem feedback iteration in the process of using it. The latter two require customers who are willing to risk their lives to jump with you. Such customers are scarcer than pandas, especially in the consumer electronics market, and a chip rollover may be doomed. Apple and Huawei, both have natural advantages in this regard.</p><p>The third is the team. The more the chip is designed, the closer it is to the sciences of computers, semiconductors and mathematics. To make a processor-level chip, not only top engineers, but also top scientists are needed. In Silicon Valley, the birthplace of computers and semiconductors, although these talents can't be said to be everywhere, they are definitely more than anywhere else in the world.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9c3bdc53fca9684a19e69d638e8a7a66\" tg-width=\"550\" tg-height=\"440\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/>Apple chips undergoing durability testing, 2018</p><p>After Apple decided to make a core, it immediately started the search for top talents-or top gods.</p><p>The first to join the team is Daniel Dobberpuhl, known as \"Big D\". He previously led two prominent RISC projects at DEC – Alpha and StronARM. Alpha chip once shone brightly in the field of workstations and servers. Although it eventually lost to Intel, it had far-reaching influence, and you can even see its shadow on the light of Shenwei Taihu Lake.</p><p>StrongARM ended up with almost the same ending, and was finally sold to Intel by DEC together with Big D himself. Dobberpuh left Intel for a few days and founded SiByte, focusing on MIPS architecture chips, and developed rapidly. A few years later, this company with only 120 people was acquired by Broadcom at a sky-high price of $2 billion, and Big D was completely financially free.</p><p>In 2003, Dobberpuh left his job again, founded PA Semi, and turned to PowerPC architecture chips. By 2008, Apple, which was already planning to make a core, acquired PA Semi. At this time, there were only 40 people in Apple's chip team, and PA Semi brought more than 150 people at once, which greatly strengthened the depth of the team's bench.</p><p>Long before the acquisition of PA Semi, Apple had already dug Jim Keller, another great god in this company. Dobberpuh is good at serial entrepreneurship, while Jim Keller's traditional skill is crazy job-hopping. DEC, Apple, AMD, Intel and Tesla have all stayed, but he has left legendary works everywhere-such as the Zen processor that revived AMD's glory.</p><p>The last great god is Johny Srouji, who Apple poached from IBM. Johny Srouji, of Arab descent, was born in Israel to a carpenter father, who grew up with excellent academic achievements and was admitted to the Israel Institute of Technology, known as the \"MIT of the Middle East\", and is fluent in Hebrew, Arabic, French and English. After graduation, he joined IBM's research and development center in Israel.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9883b1b667e9e6c76c2e810657690b96\" tg-width=\"550\" tg-height=\"367\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/>Cook and Johny Srouji (second from left)</p><p>After IBM temporarily emerged, Johny Srouji was poached by Intel, and after eight years of work, he was dug back by IBM to be responsible for the research and development of high-performance computing chip POWER7. After a few back and forth, he became a rising star in the semiconductor industry. Apple's head of hardware, Bob Mansfield, highly recommended Johny Srouji to Jobs, who decisively hired him.</p><p>Again: One's fate depends on one's own struggle, of course, but it also needs to consider the course of history. Most of the people on Apple's chip team have dedicated their careers to the ill-fated RISC, but in the rush to the Intel x86 empire, they have basically lost more than won. Like Apple, these people finally waited for the moment when the industrial ecology changed drastically.</p><p>Many great gods returned to their positions, and Johny Srouji was appointed as the head of the entire chip team. He later recalled what Jobs told him: \"If Apple is to really stand out and provide users with truly unique and great products, the only way is to have your own chip-you have to control and own it.\"</p><p>It will take at least a few years for a new processor to go from design to mass production. So subsequent models of the original iPhone, including the 2008 iPhone 3G and 2009 iPhone 3GS, still use Samsung's chips. Meanwhile, Apple's acquisition continues, and the final piece of the planned puzzle is a Texas-based company called Intrinsity.</p><p>This company specializes in a technology called Fast14, which can accelerate the general-purpose core provided by ARM from 650MHz to 1GHz. In 2009, Samsung announced its cooperation with Intrinsity, and used their technology to build the \"Hummingbird\" core and S5PC110 chip-this chip was mounted on Samsung's first generation Galaxy S mobile phone, which sold worldwide and became the earliest challenger of iPhone.</p><p>After realizing the value of Intrinsity, Apple preempted Samsung to take Intrinsity into its bag, which led to Samsung no longer being able to use Intrinsity technology in the future. 2010 is also the beginning of Samsung and Apple's parting ways-Samsung boasts that it is the boss of Android camp and has gone to war with iPhone in an all-round way, while Apple still has to rely on Samsung for screens, flash memory and chips, so it can only bite its teeth and swallow it.</p><p>Under the background of the seemingly separate cooperation between the two companies and the surging undercurrent of cooperation, Apple's first-generation self-developed chip A4 was released in January 2010, which has the scene at the beginning of this article.</p><p>Apple's own team's contribution to A4 is actually not big. Most of the design work of A4 is completed by Samsung and Intrinsity, and it is actually identical twins with Samsung's S5PC110 chip. Therefore, when some disassembly mechanisms took microscopic photos and infrared imaging of the A4 die, and found that Apple's claimed self-research was the same as the S5PC110 core, ridicule overwhelmed.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a1722e3d2e2e8719cc9245cadf0f062e\" tg-width=\"550\" tg-height=\"346\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/>Compared with A4 and S5PC110, ARM cores are almost the same</p><p>But Johny Srouji and his team were hardly affected, and the addition of Intrinsity's team of more than 100 people made Apple even more powerful. Several teams of different backgrounds gathered to focus on the A5 and race against time to get the A5 to ride the iPhone 4S, which is scheduled to be released in 2011.</p><p>On the other hand, Jobs asked Cook to send his general and vice president of operations Jeff Williams to Taiwan Province secretly to contact TSMC. Zhang Zhongmou personally received him at home, and the two sides reached an agreement drinking red wine: Apple will transfer the chip foundry order to TSMC in the future, and TSMC will guarantee to prepare $9 billion in factory construction funds and 6,000 workers to ensure production capacity.</p><p>Soon, the whole world will witness the shocking process of Apple's chip team killing God and Buddha killing Buddha.</p><p><b>God blocks killing God, Buddha blocks killing Buddha</b></p><p>Driving north from bustling Tel Aviv, Israel, through the salty sea breeze, you can reach the city of Herzliya, bathed in the Mediterranean sun, within 30 kilometers.</p><p>It's far from Gaza and the West Bank, and you'll hardly see the white smoke streaking across the sky as the Iron Dome intercepts Hamas rockets. People enjoy white sand beaches, dense cafes and lush boulevards, and a lifestyle less like the Middle East and more like California in a quiet small town where more than 1,000 employees are working on chips for Apple.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cc131ec5f85f5aae71673b2bf7cad5f9\" tg-width=\"550\" tg-height=\"289\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/>Apple's R&D Center in Herzliya</p><p>Apple's deployment of a huge army in Israel is related to Johny Srouji being an Israeli on the one hand, and because Israel itself is a rich mine of semiconductor talents on the other hand. Since 2011, Apple has set up the second largest overseas R&D center in this place 12,000 kilometers away from Silicon Valley through recruitment and acquisition, almost all of which are chip-related.</p><p>It is difficult to find hints of Apple's core-making in Levant news such as the Syrian civil war and the rise of ISIS, and Apple's silence has made Johny Srouji's team mysterious, and he himself is rarely interviewed. Then Bloomberg finally got an interview in 2016, and the title was straightforward: The most important Apple executive you've never heard of.</p><p>In fact, this kind of deliberate not only increases rumors and speculation, but also has no \"low-key\" effect-because the powerful performance of A series chips has hit everyone's faces.</p><p>In 2010, A4 had mixed praises, but the two dual-core chips, A5 in 2011 and A6 in 2012, have already aligned with the quad-core chips of Android in the same period in performance. In 2013, Apple took the lead in launching the world's first 64-bit processor A7, leaving Qualcomm and Samsung, which are still in the 32-bit era, far behind. Since then, mobile SoC has entered the 64-bit era.</p><p>To understand Apple chips, you need to know some facts first: ARM actually sells two things, one is called \"architecture license\", and customers can design their own kernels according to the instruction set architecture; One is called \"public version kernel\", which is the kernel designed by ARM for you. Customers can buy it home and integrate it into their own chips.</p><p>To use an analogy that may not be appropriate: \"architecture license\" is like selling ingredients. ARM helps you wash and peel them off. You don't have to build a vegetable garden to grow it yourself (to lower the chip design cost), but whether the final dish tastes good or not depends on your level of frying and cooking; The latter is ready-made food made with the above ingredients. Go home and put some chopped green onion to cook it simply, and you can soon make up a banquet table.</p><p>Of course, \"ready-made food\" sounds simple, but there are not many people in the world who can do well, and even fewer people dare to try to cook and develop private kernels by themselves. For example, the \"architecture license\" of ARMv8 has only 15 customers in the world. Apple's A4 and A5 are both buying public version cores, which is equivalent to eating \"ready-made food\" for two years. Since the A6 chip equipped with iPhone5, Apple wants to cook by itself.</p><p>Johny Srouji's team first launched the Swift kernel based on ARMv7 architecture, which made A6 well received; At the end of 2011, ARM released a new ARMv8 architecture. Apple sprinted to come up with the Cyclone core based on the new architecture within 12 months. The A7 equipped with the new core became the world's first 64-bit processor, pulling down Qualcomm and Samsung by a large part.</p><p>After that, the story is familiar. From A7 to A16 released last year, Apple's A-series chips basically crushed the same chips in Android camp.</p><p>The chip design ability tempered by the A series has not surprisingly \"overflowed\" to other hardware innovations of Apple. In 2014, Apple released the first generation of Apple Watch, equipped with Apple's self-developed S series chips; In 2016, Apple released the first generation of Airpods, equipped with self-developed W series chips (later replaced by H series).</p><p>Airpods are a great example of chip-driven hardware innovation. Before the advent of Airpods, most products on the market needed to connect two headphones with solid lines, while Apple realized Bluetooth signal monitoring through W1 chip, eliminated the cumbersome transmission line, and greatly improved the experience of delay, noise reduction and battery life, basically redefining the product of \"wireless Bluetooth headphones\".</p><p>In 2018, Apple, whose internal strength has improved by leaps and bounds, finally made an earth-shattering decision: to re-aim its gun at Intel.</p><p>This is probably the hardest bone to crack since the birth of the semiconductor industry. As mentioned above, Intel has been running vertically and horizontally in the half century since its birth, and its feet are full of the bones of challengers. Not only is the x86 empire close to a monopoly on PCs, but it has also pushed the RISC camp out of the market in the field of servers and high-performance computers (HPC).</p><p>Since Apple dares to challenge Intel here, it will definitely not fight an unprepared battle. In fact, after years of silent development, the number of Johny Srouji's team has exceeded 4,000, and its combat effectiveness is explosive. More importantly, many technologies of A series can be used with M series (the code name of Apple's desktop chips).</p><p>For example, based on ARMv8 architecture, Apple has designed two cores with cool names, Firestorm and Icestorm. The former has high performance and the latter has low energy consumption. The A14 chip released in September 2020 used these two cores (2+4), while the M1 chip released in November 2020 also used (4+4).</p><p>Of course, designing desktop chips is much more complex than mobile phone chips, and the probability of rollover is also very high. Therefore, when Apple informed Intel of the decision to change the core, the latter was shocked and reminded of the risks. Apple said, \"This is not the first time for us (to change the chip)\", and frequently complained about Intel's toothpaste-like product upgrade, which was very much like acting in a movie: the determination to break up.</p><p>Not only Apple is dissatisfied with Intel's toothpaste squeezing, but many users in Wintel camp also secretly hope that Intel can be a little under pressure; Those fruit powders who have seen the crushing-level combat effectiveness of Apple's A series chips are naturally looking forward to it; For observers of the semiconductor industry, this matter is even more significant-northwest Shanxi has not been a pot of porridge for a long time, and the bigger you Li Yunlong make, the better.</p><p>In November 2020, Cook released the Macbook Pro powered by the M1 chip. All chip players held their breath the moment they showed off the M1's performance.</p><p>M1 has a total of 16 billion transistors. It integrates 8-core CPU (4 large and 4 small), 8-core GPU, image processing unit (ISP), neural network unit, etc. on a silicon-based SoC, and greatly improves the internal communication bandwidth through unified memory technology. The performance of single-core and multi-core can be simply understood as between Intel's i7 and i9.</p><p>The powerful performance of M1 reached the point where Intel watched silence and AMD watched tears. Even Apple's internal executives were surprised by the performance of M1. After the press conference, Craig Federighi, the head of Apple's software, and John Ternus, the head of Apple's hardware, bluntly said in an interview [11]: Apple itself could not predict that the M1 chip would bring such a great progress.</p><p>Apple executives may still be suspected of Wang Po selling melons, but Macbook sales will not lie: in 2021, notebook sales soared due to the epidemic, but Macbook grew the fastest, with a market share of more than 10% and a share expansion of 24%; As the pandemic ebbed in 2022, against the backdrop of declining notebook sales worldwide, Macbook continued to grow, with its share already reaching 14%.</p><p>After M1, Johny Srouji's team continued to siege the city, launching M1 Pro, M1 Max, M1 Ultra and M2 chips one after another, and gradually replacing the Intel chips of other Apple desktop devices. Johny Srouji also began to go to the front desk, frequently appearing at Apple's press conferences, and there were even rumors that he would take over as Intel's CEO.</p><p>Although Apple will not sell M-series chips to the outside world to go to war directly with Intel, the 30-year wrestling between the two companies has finally come to an end.</p><p>Not only Intel, but also Apple has intersected with almost all semiconductor giants: it abandoned IBM and Motorola, which directly led to their withdrawal from the chip field; It cut Samsung and propped up its rival TSMC; It suppressed Qualcomm, so that all Android machines were afraid to say that they were comparable to A series chips...</p><p>A book of Apple's core making, half of the history of the rise of Silicon Valley. Looking back, this counterattack of Apple's core-making is so long that this story almost covers most influential figures and events in Silicon Valley-from the origin of integrated circuits to the revolution of personal computers, from the hegemony of Wintel Alliance to the counterattack of RISC camp, from the birth of ARM to the rise of TSMC...</p><p>What can we learn from an Odyssean homecoming story?</p><p><b>Apocalypse</b></p><p>If you simply ask what reference is to the story of Apple's core-making, then the answer is simple: almost no reference.</p><p>Apple is a company that took off at the same frequency as Silicon Valley, and its history itself is part of Silicon Valley. Steve Jobs, a native of Silicon Valley, had a close personal relationship with many chip gods in textbooks. For example, Robert Noyce, the founder of Fairchild and Intel, even joked to his wife: If Steve Jobs called me so late again, I would kill him.</p><p>The aforementioned \"one premise and three conditions\" of core making, in addition to the \"premise\", separate funds (profit margin and capital reserve), team (talent density and appeal) and customers (market share and user stickiness), coupled with the characteristics of the founder, you will find that Apple's success cannot be replicated not only by Chinese companies, but also by no second company in the United States.</p><p>If this cool article can have any inspiration, then the author mentions a less grand angle: computers and chips are \"industries\", but they are even more \"science\".</p><p>The \"bright thread\" of Apple's core-making story is how a consumer electronics company tolerates how to break out and finally understand the grudge; The \"dark line\" is the thirty-year struggle between two different chip design concepts of CISC and RISC-this struggle is essentially the extension of the development of the \"science\" of Computer Architecture in the \"industry\".</p><p>What Characterizes Industry? Output value, profits and taxes, market share, employed population. What Characterizes Science? Theories, laws, ideas, underlying breakthroughs. Computers and chips are industries, of course, but they are two sciences that were born less than 100 years ago and are still evolving and breaking through. The elements in Apple's story remind us of the fact that the United States is where these two sciences originated.</p><p>What makes up the edifice of the two sciences of computers and chips are transistors, integrated circuits, Unix, compilers, Ethernet, GUI (user graphical interface), RISC, databases, TCP/IP, object-oriented programming, laser printing, artificial intelligence, floating point computing, neural networks, machine learning…almost all of them appear in the United States.</p><p>Industry is easy to transfer, but science is not easy to transfer, or science can't be transferred. Only by carefully cultivating scientific spirit can we blossom and bear fruit on our own land. Although many industries in the United States have been transferred, they still control the innovation of computer and chip science. So far, almost all of the more than 70 ACM Turing Award winners are Americans.</p><p>Understanding this makes it easy to answer many people's questions: Why is my industry so large and so easy to get stuck?</p><p>Of course, considering the starting point, it is not easy to start the industry first. After all, when Apple was founded, the Gang of Four was still on stage. At the 1984 Los Angeles Olympics, Western journalists used IBM PCs, but Chinese journalists only had pen and paper. \"Of the 7,000 journalists covering the Olympics worldwide, only Chinese wrote their reports by hand,\" AFP wrote.</p><p>In the more than 40 years of rapid economic progress, both the heads of large enterprises and the section chiefs of 18th-tier cities are accustomed to considering problems with the thinking of \"industry\". Just like Yang Yuanqing's conversation with Musk in 2014, the former asked the latter: In 2013, Lenovo sold a total of 115 million devices. How many cars did Tesla sell?</p><p>Parameters such as output value, scale and market share are indeed of great significance, but they should not be obscured by them. In the past, too many enterprises were keen on scale, piling heads and price wars. After achieving certain results, they dared not climb up the chain, but were still immersed in low-quality zero-sum games.</p><p>Does industrial thinking matter? Of course, it is important, and its significance to developing countries cannot be overemphasized. However, for a \"hard-working\" country that is climbing upward, scientific thinking must not be lacking. In recent years, there is often a common phenomenon: hard bones are rarely chewed, but seemingly easy feelings are rolled by a bunch of people.</p><p>The whole society should encourage Chinese technology companies to devote their energy to cutting-edge scientific breakthroughs, rather than urging them to plant trees and donate money. And they themselves should not be fooled by those scale indicators-rich countries like Apple have spent thirty years sharpening their swords, not to mention those whose profit margins are often only in the single digits?</p><p>In recent years, more and more companies have emerged in China that rely on \"technology\" to make money, and have established a right to speak in the global industrial chain. However, at the moment of stuck neck, people can't help but sigh: It would be nice if there were more enterprises like xxx. Through some boiling data, we often find that the gap in many industries is still huge.</p><p>Know yourself and your enemy, an important confidant. To paraphrase what Fan Zhiyi said after the national football team lost to Thailand: \"Be pragmatic and understand the concept of this football first.\" For many industries in China, there are indeed too many things to understand. All industry participants need to be patient, patient and patient again.</p><p></body></html></p>","source":"lsy1585097861883","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Core-making: Fail, hibernate, accumulate power, and then beat everyone</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Core-making: Fail, hibernate, accumulate power, and then beat everyone\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">远川研究所</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2023-02-05 12:00</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><html><head></head><body>In January 2010, Jobs, who was in the terminal stage of cancer, showed Apple's self-developed A4 chip to the world for the first time at the launch of the first generation iPad.</p><p>This 45nm chip is manufactured by Samsung, with built-in ARM's Cortex-A8 core, a running frequency of 1GHz and outstanding performance. Despite its historical significance, at the more than an hour-long iPad launch conference, Jobs only used a few words to talk about the A4 chip, which added up to less than 20 seconds.</p><p>This is a deliberate low-key. Before the press conference, Apple kept a tight lip on its self-developed chips, which is related to the history of Apple's core-making: as one of the most important popularizers of microcomputers, Apple started almost at the same time as integrated circuit technology. In the more than 30 years since its establishment, it charged the chips several times, but the result was repeated defeats.</p><p>Sure enough, the sensitive media smelled the clues, and most of them mocked Apple's self-developed chip. It was generally believed that \"A4 chip referred to Samsung's design, and Apple shamelessly posted its own brand\".</p><p>Ars Technica, a technology media outlet, believes that the A4 design is mediocre and \"nothing worth writing about\".</p><p>Rationally, it is indeed difficult for Apple to develop its own mobile phone chips. In 2010, the mobile chip market was already full of giants: Qualcomm's Snapdragon swept through the army, Samsung's Exynos was ready to go, Nvidia's Tegra was ambitious, and even Intel's Atom felt it could do it, trying to get a piece of the pie.</p><p>But people underestimated Apple's determination to pry open the iron plate: a year later, Apple showed off the second-generation chip A5 at the iPhone 4S conference. The CPU performance was twice that of A4, and the GPU performance was nine times that of A4. The performance improvement was huge, which made the industry realize the fact that Apple had indeed gotten the expensive ticket to the commanding heights of semiconductors.</p><p>Unfortunately, Jobs, the layout maker, failed to witness the next story. He died shortly after watching the live broadcast of A5's appearance in his hospital bed.</p><p>Ten years later, Apple has built a semiconductor empire that includes multiple product lines such as A-series (mobile phones & tablets), M-series (desktop PCs), H-series (headphones), S-series (watches), and especially when Cook showed people the M1 chip to replace Intel in late 2020, people felt an indescribable shock.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a0ae07d364781d0bc5c7968db4eb0261\" tg-width=\"550\" tg-height=\"550\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/>Apple M1 Chip</p><p>After 2000, the stories of two new entrants in the chip industry are the most tortuous, one is Huawei HiSilicon and the other is Apple Silicon. The former presents the tragic style of Zhang patrolling Suiyang, while the latter is more like a Homer epic depicting Odysseus'return home. Both of them have more or less changed the rhythm of the Sino-US science and technology war.</p><p>Apple core-making is a continuous history, bounded by A4, and the stories of before and after are all playful: before A4, Apple was a bamboo basket and defeated repeatedly; After A4, Apple is the God who blocks the God and the Buddha who blocks the Buddha. Samsung, Qualcomm and Intel, the top chip players in the world, are either defeated or abandoned by Apple.</p><p>It's a story about business, but more so about the \"science\" of computers.</p><p><b>Butterfly wings for $150</b></p><p>Many years later, in the face of the M1 chip, Steve Wozniak may be reminded of the distant night when he first met the Intel 8080.</p><p>As Apple's co-founder, Wozniak saw the Altair 8800, which appeared on the cover of the January issue of Popular Electronics and claimed to be the first personal computer, and the Intel 8080 chip that powered it at a \"Homebrew Computer Club\" gathering in 1975, a year before Apple was founded.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/27a4535f885a7f6e655d74edfadda6f8\" tg-width=\"477\" tg-height=\"417\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/>Magazine cover with Altair 8800</p><p>Since humans entered the era of transistors and integrated circuits in the late 1950s, the size of electronic computers has been decreasing at a rate visible to the naked eye every year. The process is being driven by a young Silicon Valley, with countless emerging companies competing in the hot land. By the 1970s, computers were only a few layers of window paper away from entering ordinary people's homes.</p><p>Altair 8800 is recognized as igniting the microcomputer revolution. It inspired Bill Gates and Paul Allen to launch the first product in Microsoft's history, the BASIC programming language, and also gave Wozniak the idea of assembling a computer himself. The only problem is that Intel 8080 is too expensive.</p><p>An assembled Altair 8800 costs $621, but the bulk 8080 costs $170. Wozniak described it as \"more expensive than my month's rent\", so he started looking for a replacement: first he found a Motorola 6800, which he bought through an acquaintance for only $40/piece, and later he found a big-name replacement for the 6800, the MOS 6502 made by MOS Technologies, which can be picked up for $20.</p><p>When Wozniak showed the assembled microcomputer to Jobs, the latter was taken aback and realized that it could be a great business opportunity. Jobs is also very satisfied with Wozniak's abandonment of Intel chips. He believes that \"technology is only a means, and ultimately it is to improve the consumer experience.\"</p><p>This microcomputer powered by a $20 cheap chip is Apple's first generation product, the Apple I. And so, the Apple story begins.</p><p>This year, Jobs was 20, Wozniak was 25, the computer world was still dominated by IBM mainframes, Altair was still a toy for geeks, and Intel was still struggling to survive the first recession of the silicon cycle. Two Steves can't realize that the $150 saved on chips will cost tens of millions of times to make up in the future.</p><p>In 1977, Apple launched its first full-blown product, the Apple II, and sales skyrocketed. It is shown by its beautiful appearance and built-in keyboard, and Wozniak's programming skills and Jobs's design aesthetics are vividly reflected. But these longboards mask a problem: The Apple II is still using the cheap MOS 6502 processor.</p><p>At the end of 1981, the CPU of Apple's Apple III was still this old 6502, while its competitor IBM had already used Intel's 8088 chip, and its performance was about 10 times that of the 8080 abandoned by Wozniak. Simple comparison: MOS 6502 has just over 3,000 transistors, while Intel 8088 has a whopping 29,000.</p><p>Cheap but \"sufficient\" chips can keep Apple with an extremely high gross profit margin, but the premise is that hardware won't become a shortcoming, at least it can't hold back software. Apparently, the 6502 chip, born in 1975, struggled to support 1980s computers, and frequently malfunctioning circuit boards and slow running speeds eventually made Apple III sales dismal.</p><p>Pressure from competitors is also mounting. In 1981, IBM changed its usual bulky figure and launched a compatible personal computer (also known as IBM PC) using Microsoft MS-DOS and Intel 8088, which was a great success, and pulled almost all personal computer manufacturers except Apple into the \"Microsoft + Intel\" camp.</p><p>At that time, Intel had not yet transformed into toothpaste. At the same time, the release of chip performance followed Moore's Law. 8080 was launched in 1974, 8086 was launched in 1978, 80186 and 80286 were launched in 1982, and then 80386, 80486 and the epoch-making Pentium-whose Chinese name has become the memory of a whole generation: Pentium.</p><p>However, after missing it in the early days, it is difficult for Jobs to re-enter Intel's arms with his character, especially since Intel is already the core backbone of the hostile camp.</p><p>Fortunately, there were many companies in Silicon Valley that could wrestle arms with Intel at that time, and Motorola was one of them. In 1976, Intel was developing 16-bit 8086 internally. After Motorola learned about it, it decided to do a big one directly-since you do 16-bit, I will go directly to 32-bit. After four years of research and development, Motorola launched the powerful Motorola 68000 chip in 1980.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/add711b1e6e8c1bec085772e275d6c25\" tg-width=\"550\" tg-height=\"213\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/>Motorola 68000 Chip</p><p>68000 chip, also known as \"68k\", means that there are 68,000 transistors inside the chip, and its performance is about twice that of Intel 8086 (and more expensive), so it is widely used in high-end machines of HP, Sun and DEC and game consoles with high performance requirements. For Jobs, who is eager to seek new chips but doesn't want to commit himself to Intel, it is even more drought.</p><p>Therefore, Macintosh (that is, the first generation Mac), a new product that decided Apple's fate, decided to use 68000 chips. Project manager Jef Raskin originally wanted to use Motorola 6809, which had low performance but was cheap, but it was rejected by Jobs, who suffered a loss, and personally cut the wholesale price of 68k from $125/piece to $35/piece.</p><p>On January 24, 1984, a generation of classic Macintosh was officially released. The commercial \"1984\" directed by the director of \"Blade Runner\" packaged Apple as a rebel against IBM Orwellian rule, which stunned everyone, and Jobs also shed tears at the press conference. The advent of Mac has left the deepest imprint on the PC revolution wave in the 1980s.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1d69c8713a519dae632e74255977b2f0\" tg-width=\"436\" tg-height=\"572\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/>Jobs releasing the first Macintosh, 1984</p><p>The 68000 chip does live up to expectations, and its strong performance strongly supports the dazzling graphical interface and convenient mouse operation. But the first-generation Mac dropped the chain in other ways, such as only 128K of memory, and the later upgrade to 512k was still not enough (at least 1000K needed). After the hot sale in the early stage of sale, the sales of Mac, which was once praised as \"the perfect combination of computer technology and art\", dropped sharply because of its slow running speed.</p><p>In the spring of 1985, Jobs, who tried to remove CEO Sculley, was pushed out of the company by the latter, and the joint board of directors.</p><p>Jobs left, but the 68,000 chips he selected at that time were continued to be entrusted with important tasks. From 1985 to 1994, subsequent versions of the Mac all used the 680x0 family of chips, from 68000 to 68060. Motorola's 680x0 family was also one of the few forces that could compete with Intel's 80x86 family at that time.</p><p>Not joining the Intel x86 architecture camp allowed Apple to avoid being reduced to the role of working for \"Intel Inside\"-a role that was finally played by HP, Dell and Lenovo. But this choice also brings potential hidden dangers to Apple: When Intel is racing along Moore's Law, can Motorola, a thin dog, do it?</p><p>In fact, although the 680x0 family chips are not inferior to Intel's 80x86 family in some performances, Intel crushed Motorola in terms of shipments. At that time, the chip industry was basically IDM vertical integration mode, and design, manufacturing, packaging and testing were grasped. There was a rule in this mode: economies of scale caused by heavy assets.</p><p>For example: If both chip companies A and B produce a certain type, A is the leader in the industry and B is the second, A produces 1 million pieces and B produces 300,000 pieces, will B's profit be 30% of A's? The answer is no. Not only does it not reach 30%, but it may not even reach 3%. It is more likely that A makes money and B loses money.</p><p>A CPU may only cost $30, but the fixed cost (R&D investment and production line) may cost hundreds of millions of dollars. The more chips you make, the lower the cost shared on each chip. The gap between Intel x86 architecture chips and Motorola 680x0 family chips is far bigger than the gap between 1 million and 300,000 chips.</p><p>This makes it increasingly difficult for Motorola to keep up with the pace, and the development of new chips is often delayed. For example, the 68040, which was originally planned to be released in 1989, dragged on for a whole year, almost overturning Apple's new products. But Apple had no choice but to serve Motorola carefully and enjoy the distress of being controlled by others.</p><p>Fortunately or unfortunately, Jobs has no chance to be on the front line to solve these problems. In the next decade, as a bystander, he will witness Apple falling into an a vicious circle that is tired of coping with the \"Intel + Microsoft\" camp, trying to make cores but repeatedly losing, and finally eroding its market share step by step.</p><p>No one knows what would have happened if Woz had chosen Intel, but there is no doubt that the $150 saved must have been the butterfly wings that changed some of the course of history.</p><p><b>The desperate 90s</b></p><p>In 1981, when both Steves were still at Apple, two people named David in California did a far-reaching job.</p><p>In 1981, University of California Berkeley professor David Patterson and PhD student David Ditzel published \"The Case for a Reduced Instruction Set Computer.\" In this paper, the Chinese translation of Reduced Instruction Set Computer is \"Reduced Instruction Set Computer\", and its initial letter is taken as an abbreviation, which will become famous in the future-RISC.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/67daa7ca92ebf56537cb7d51de6542e6\" tg-width=\"550\" tg-height=\"314\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/>David Patterson (left) and Carlo Séquin, 1981</p><p>There is a \"reduced instruction computer\", and there is a \"complex instruction computer\", that is, CISC. The difference between the two can be simply understood as that in the processor adopting RISC design concept, the instructions are shorter, the length is uniform and the speed is faster; However, the instructions in the processor with CISC design concept are mostly long and complex, and the running efficiency is low.</p><p>In the era when microprocessors first came out (the world's first commercial microprocessor was Intel's 4004, which was launched in 1971), designers usually needed to rack their brains to balance cost and performance, and the defects of instruction set design were ignored. Therefore, early mainstream microprocessors, including Intel 8080 and Motorola 68k, can be classified as CISC architectures.</p><p>This is the background of this paper. They redefine a new approach to CPU design, RISC, and classify any processor that does not meet the RISC philosophy as CISC. This makes Intel very frustrated. After all, no one wants people to sit at home, but a \"complicated\" hat comes from the sky.</p><p>While Intel is unhappy, Apple, which has been trying to find a breaking point, seems to have grasped the straw.</p><p>In the late 1980s, the IBM compatible machine camp (IBM, HP, Dell, etc.) also used Microsoft's graphical operating system-Windows, which gradually squeezed Apple into the corner. Although it is still strong in several high-end fields such as desktop publishing, Apple must constantly improve its hardware performance to hold the last one-third acre of land, and chips are obviously a good breakthrough.</p><p>After the concept of RISC was put forward, Silicon Valley responded positively, and Stanford's MIPS, Sun's SPARC, DEC's Alpha and other projects all achieved a certain degree of success. This makes Apple think \"I can do it\", and Motorola's chip supply often rolls over, so Apple's management waves its hand: make its own chips.</p><p>To be safe, Apple chose to cooperate with the operator AT&T, and successively launched two RISC projects: Aquarius project and Hobbit project. The former wanted to replace Motorola 68000 as the main chip of Mac; The latter is intended to be used on the Newton handheld computer under development.</p><p>Unfortunately, Apple has no experience in the field of chip design after all, and AT&T is no longer the AT&T that commands the world by Bell Labs. Together, the two stooges can't make up half of Zhuge Liang, and Aquarius and Hobbit have failed one after another, and tens of millions of dollars of R&D funds have been wasted.</p><p>During this period, Intel x86 architecture continued to make great progress, and even humbly learned the RISC concept. In 1989, when the Aquarius project was put on hold, Intel introduced the 32-bit 80486, which used RISC technology for the first time in the x86 series of chips; In 1993, Intel launched the Pentium processor, which began its long-term monopoly on the CPU market.</p><p>Apple attributes the failure of Aquarius and Hobbit to the incompetence of their partners. Therefore, in 1990, Apple chose stronger allies to make cores together-old enemy IBM and old friend Motorola, which formed the most watched \"AIM Alliance\" (Apple, IBM, Motorola) in the PC industry that year.</p><p>IBM and Motorola each have their own thoughts: after several years of compatible PC, IBM found that it couldn't beat the rising stars of Dell and Compaq at all, and regretted that it outsourced PC chips to Intel; Motorola's appeal is even simpler: fighting Intel alone is about the same as riding Yadi to chase Audi, which is really unbearable.</p><p>The new alliance is full of confidence. IBM started RISC technology reserve very early (even before David Patterson put forward RISC). In 1980s, it successfully developed high-end chips based on RISC POWER architecture, dominating the field of servers and workstations. The plan of this cooperation is to \"sink\" the POWER architecture into the PC.</p><p>Although Motorola is not very reliable, it has experience in consumer chip development. In addition, Apple could sell more than 1.3 million (1990) terminal computers every year at that time, ensuring that the purchase of new chips could break through the scale line of breakeven. Therefore, the AIM Alliance's decisive battle with Intel can be described as 800,000 versus 600,000, and the advantage is mine.</p><p>In this way, the AIM Alliance was launched in 1990, and the new chip was named: PowerPC-the letter \"PC\" was added after IBM's original word POWER. The development of the first chip, PowerPC 601, officially started in October 1991, and it took 21 months to complete, and mass production began in July 1993.</p><p>It is worth mentioning that \"core changing\" is an extremely complicated project, which probably needs to accomplish three things: First, rewrite the underlying code of the operating system, which is a huge amount of engineering; The second is to get the code converter to ensure that the new chip is compatible with the previous software; The third is to provide software developers with new development tools and persuade them to use them.</p><p>When PowerPC 601 was still under development, Apple's engineers were already in full swing to prepare and successfully completed most of the work before the chip was mass-produced. Saving these \"heart transplant\" experiences is very important for Apple, because although this is its first \"core change\", it is definitely not the last.</p><p>In March 1994, the first generation of Mac equipped with PowerPC chip was released in Manhattan, and Apple finally successfully changed its core, which also meant the curtain call of Motorola's 68000 series.</p><p>The media did not hesitate to praise it. MacWorld evaluates: \"Apple recaptures performance leadership it lost 8 years ago\".</p><p>Consumer feedback is also very positive, with 150,000 units sold in the pre-sale stage alone; In January 1995, sales exceeded 1 million units; By mid-1995, the Power Mac had replaced almost all previous models equipped with Motorola's 680x0 family of chips.</p><p>After changing the core, Apple frequently compared Intel's chips in the same period: in 1997, Apple claimed that the performance of PowerPC G3 was twice that of Pentium II in the same period; In 1999, Apple claimed that the PowerPC G4 was 2.94 times the Pentium III of the same period; In 2003, Apple claimed that PowerPC G5 was even more powerful than Pentium 4-this \"far ahead\" tone, even Mr. Yu Chengdong called it an expert.</p><p>Is the Wintel camp scared silly? No. Instead, their coping strategy is: you hit yours, I hit mine. Where does this confidence come from?</p><p>Confidence comes from the laws of the industry. As mentioned in the previous chapter, the asset-heavy IDM model led to the scale effect of chips. Just like when the 680x0 family fought fiercely, x86 chips always pressed each other in terms of cost, and even their advantages were expanding-Intel's market share was 50% in 1985, and it had exceeded 80% in 1995.</p><p>Without scale, there is no profit; Without profits, there cannot be sufficient funds to improve product defects. Because PowerPC comes from the \"sinking\" of IBM server and workstation chips, it inevitably has the problems of high power consumption and high heat generation, but the AIM Alliance, which is stretched out of funds, has never been able to solve it.</p><p>For example, PowerPC G5, which claims to beat Pentium 4 in performance, has extremely high power consumption and huge heat generation. Apple has to redesign the chassis structure to accommodate a huge radiator, and the high-end version even needs to install a water cooling system, which makes many people in the industry ridicule crazily: this goods has the guts to call themselves RISC?</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2ad0be5c9dbb55ba0b4329077ad5f762\" tg-width=\"550\" tg-height=\"526\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/>The enormous size of the PowerPC G5 chip</p><p>When it comes to product defects, there are many problems in x86 architecture, such as complex instructions, few registers and high power consumption. However, with its strong financial strength, Intel improved the architectural defects with one hand and smashed the process technology with the other hand, which not only blocked the RISC camp from the mainstream of PC, but also eaten away the share of servers and HPC (high-performance computers).</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bf5d3347f4d2438256d6130944d14047\" tg-width=\"550\" tg-height=\"329\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/>Intel's market share in PC, data center, HPC</p><p>Software ecology is an insurmountable gap. One story is: Adobe, the imaging software giant, made its fortune on Apple, and the first generation of Photoshop was only released on Mac systems. In 1993, Adobe's focus turned to Windows. After Jobs returned, he asked Adobe to develop more software for Mac, such as Premiere. As a result, because too few users were rejected in person, Jobs never forgave Adobe until his death.</p><p>In the 1990s, the WinTel Alliance has entered a virtuous circle of self-strengthening: large shipments → dilution of CapEx → purchase by many manufacturers → prosperity of software ecology → consumer recognition → shipments continue to increase greatly. After PowerPC has made certain achievements with IBM's technical background and the advanced nature of RISC, it still can't break this cycle, nor can it build its own cycle.</p><p>Evaluating the success of a CPU mainly depends on three points: architecture, process and software ecology. The architecture depends on innate heredity, the process depends on acquired efforts, and the software ecology depends on vertical and horizontal integration. RISC architecture does give PowerPC some innate advantages, but the shortcomings of the latter two are really too big. AIM Alliance has been busy for a long time and found that it is still riding Yadi.</p><p>Is there really no breaking point left? Actually, there are. History tells us that no matter how strong commercial barriers and moats are, they can't dominate the rivers and lakes for thousands of years. However, the breaking point that Apple is looking for is not in itself, but in two names that were not famous at that time: one is TSMC and the other is ARM.</p><p>The latter is precisely a seed planted by Apple in the desperate 1990s.</p><p><b>If you can't beat him, surrender?</b></p><p>Silicon Valley has long been famous all over the world, but what is not well known is that there is a low-profile version of Silicon Valley in Britain-Silicon Fen.</p><p>Silicon Marsh refers to an area surrounding Cambridgeshire in England, given its eccentric name because it is located at the southern tip of a swamp (Fenlands) on the British Island. This is about equal to Zhangjiang in Shanghai or Yuehai Street in Shenzhen, where a large number of high-tech companies gather, the most famous of which is Arm, which was founded in 1990.</p><p>The birth of Arm is also closely related to the RISC wave. As early as 1983, Acorn Computer, the predecessor of ARM, was inspired by Professor Berkeley Patterson's RISC paper, and wanted to design a chip based on RISC concept, so it started a project named Acorn RISC Machine, whose acronym is ARM.</p><p>Acorn had no manufacturing capacity, so it commissioned VLSI Technology, an American company, and successfully produced the core in 1985. Later, Apple's engineers looked for a replacement for Motorcycle 68000. Once, they used ARM2 chip to run Mac software in a simulated 68000 environment, and found that it actually ran faster than 68000, so they listed ARM as an alternative.</p><p>By the late 1980s, the Hobbit project between Apple and AT&T ran aground, so ARM chip became the main chip of the sinkhole project \"Newton Pocket Computer\". Apple wanted to simply turn the spare tire into a regular company, so it proposed to Acorn to set up a joint venture company, on the condition that Acorn must transfer all ARM's intellectual property rights and 12 core employees to the new company.</p><p>Acorn's store has a small profit, so it naturally agreed, and VLSI, which is the foundry for ARM chips, said it also wanted to get on the bus. So in 1990, the three companies set up a joint venture company, with Apple investing $3 million to account for 30% of the shares (later rising to 43%). The new company was called Advanced RISC Machine (changed a word), and the abbreviation was still ARM.</p><p>Compared with Apple, which is gradually in trouble, ARM is doing more and more smoothly. With low-power chip technology and special business model (licensing chip architecture to other companies), ARM achieved profitability in 1993, completed its listing in 1998, and its stock price soared by the technology stock bubble in the late 1990s.</p><p>Therefore, after Jobs returned to Apple in 1997, he was pleasantly surprised to find that Sculley actually left him such a generous gift.</p><p>The twists and turns of Jobs' 12 years of expulsion from Apple (1985-1997) will not be repeated in this article. Apple's PC market share had fallen from 16% to 4% in 1997, when NeXT, the company he founded, was acquired by Apple and Jobs returned as a special adviser. By 1996, Apple had lost $1 billion, and the cash on its books was once enough to last three months of operation.</p><p>And Jobs has changed tremendously. Since 1985, he has witnessed the decline of Apple, Intel's domination, the struggle of AIM alliance, and Gates, who was far less famous than him in the past, as the richest man in the world; He lived through the death of his father and had a happy family life. Although he was still unruly, he was much more pragmatic.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ca5609620190201b3d97f3423a9bd8b5\" tg-width=\"550\" tg-height=\"438\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/>Middle-aged, slightly fat Steve Jobs, 1997</p><p>For example, after returning as CEO, Jobs called Gates at the first time and begged Microsoft to invest $150 million in Apple and continue to develop Mac versions of Word and Excel. During the negotiations, Jobs lowered his stature, said all the good things, and even promised to use Microsoft's IE browser as the default browser of Mac-anyone who has used IE understands how humiliating this is.</p><p>Then Jobs cut most of Apple's product lines drastically, reducing the number of models from hundreds to less than 10 models, and laid off more than 3,000 people. Among the cut-off projects, it included the \"Newton\" handheld computer, which invested countless funds but sold extremely poorly. It was also the only project that Apple used ARM chips at that time.</p><p>For ARM, which is in the limelight, Jobs' decision is pragmatic enough to be somewhat cruel: sell stocks and save Apple's life.</p><p>It's not that Jobs can't see the value of ARM, but that after cutting off Newton, Apple has no products in the low-power scenario that ARM is good at. At this time, Apple's most important task is to continue its life, rather than continue to challenge Intel. In the end, Apple got hundreds of millions of dollars by reducing its holdings to transfuse blood for its own research and development.</p><p>In 1998, Apple released the breakthrough iMac, which was a great success, and drove Apple to successfully turn losses that year, with a profit of 309 million US dollars; In 2001, Apple released the iPod, a 1,000-song player that instantly took the world by storm, and by 2007, more than 100 million iPod units had been sold. Apple is completely renewed.</p><p>After dealing with the survival problem, Jobs can free up his energy to think: How to solve the increasingly serious chip problem of Mac?</p><p>As mentioned in the previous chapter, PowerPC chips have become increasingly difficult to parry Intel's x86 family after experiencing the amazement when they were first born. After Jobs returned, he had a big quarrel with Galvin, CEO of Motorola, who is in charge of manufacturing PowerPC. On the phone, he finally couldn't help but curse: Motorola's chips suck.</p><p>Since then, Jobs has secretly plotted the launch of the AIM Alliance. However, Apple's repeated defeats in core-making experience let him know that it is tantamount to suicide to engage in chips when the conditions are immature. So he made a very pragmatic, but surprising suggestion to the board: Or maybe let's buy Intel chips.</p><p>Apple's board discussed it for 18 months and finally agreed. After the last time, we switched to changing the core after all. If Apple says that it is second, who dares to say first?</p><p>In order to sell products, Jobs had to continue to brazenly brag about PowerPC's chips in public. For example, in 2003, when he commented on the upcoming PowerPC G5, he said, \"PowerPC G5 gives us the fastest desktop computer in the world... This is the beginning of our long-term and efficient cooperation (with IBM and Motorola).\"</p><p>But the chip problem can't be dragged on any longer. At the beginning of 2001, Apple released the PowerBook equipped with PowerPC G4 chip. After that, it failed to upgrade the chip for five years (the Intel camp upgraded it every year), and its sales became worse year by year. The reason was that the subsequent PowerPC G5 chip couldn't fit in because of heat dissipation problems.</p><p>Starting in 2004, Apple began the second core change in its history. Intel CEO Paul Otellini raised his feet in favor. After all, as the standard-bearer of the anti-Wintel camp for a long time, Jobs announced the adoption of Intel chips, which is about equivalent to Dong Mingzhu announcing one day that Gree would buy an air-conditioning compressor from Fang Hongbo of the United States.</p><p>Intel sent a lean team to work with Apple and successfully completed the code modification of all the underlying operating systems within a six-month deadline. And Apple engineers have also developed a translator called Rosetta to ensure that the software on PowerPC can run smoothly on Macs based on Intel x86 chips.</p><p>In 2005, Jobs publicly announced that Mac would switch to Intel camp, and some fruit powders who had followed for many years were very angry; When Jobs finally released the iMac and Macbook Pro based on Intel's new products in January 2006, when he saw that the performance of Macbook Pro was increased by 5 times and the battery life was increased by 2 hours compared with the previous PowerBook, the press conference instantly became a large-scale real fragrance scene.</p><p>Apple's second core change was successful. Ten years later, some media commented that Jobs turned to Intel, which was one of Apple's most successful ventures.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/31311dd7bd00acef3af3fc2db4f3f0e5\" tg-width=\"550\" tg-height=\"318\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/>Intel CEO Otellini delivers chips to Jobs, 2006</p><p>The ill-fated AIM alliance finally dissolved. Motorola, which heard the news in 2004, simply withdrew from the chip business, packaged and divested its assets to set up Freescale, focusing on automotive and embedded markets. And IBM also sold some of PowerPC's assets and kept the chip product line for game consoles-that's another story.</p><p>Apple's share in the desktop computer market (desktop + notebook), which has solved the problem of \"stuck neck\" of chips, has been rising, exceeding 10% in 2007, and the following story is familiar: Jobs released the iPhone in 2007, and Apple completely stepped onto the altar, gradually becoming the largest company in the world by market value.</p><p>When the original iPhone was developed, Jobs tried to strike while the iron was hot to persuade Intel to develop a mobile chip for Apple-before Intel had time to show the world their astonishing incompetence in the mobile field. But because the price was not agreed, Otellini recalled afterwards: Who would have thought that the sales volume of his mobile phone would be (expected) 100 times?</p><p>So Apple turned to Samsung. The first iPhone used Samsung's S5L8900 chip-strictly speaking, this is not a Chip, but a SoC System on Chip, consisting of an ARM architecture Chip and a PowerVR Chip, using a 90nm process, which is barely enough. * For readers' general understanding, we will still use chips to refer to SoCs later.</p><p>Samsung's semiconductor business started in 1990s, and was personally laid out by the second generation Li Jianxi. Through the \"counter-cyclical law\", it gradually became the boss of global memory chips. In 2006, Samsung entered the field of chip foundry, quickly caught up with TSMC in technology, and became the only supplier of iPhone chips through its self-developed S5L8900 chip.</p><p>But Jobs, who has suffered a big loss from a single supplier, has a lingering worry in his heart, that is: What if Samsung becomes the second Motorola and IBM? At the 2007 iPhone conference, Jobs quoted Alan Kay: People who really care about software should build their own hardware.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a443365d8e1f3ce17500b2209a5ebad6\" tg-width=\"550\" tg-height=\"367\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>Alan Kay Who is it? He is a Turing Award winner, an inventor of object-oriented programming, and he led the development of the first user graphical interface in history at Xerox PARC, directly inspiring Jobs 'Macintosh and Gates' Windows. Quoting Alan Kay, does it mean that Jobs has realized a new inspiration?</p><p>Perhaps, it's time to solve the chip problem altogether. But the question is: Apple has gone through such a long core acid past, will it be different this time?</p><p><b>Heroes gather together regardless of where they come from</b></p><p>Under the background of almost monopoly of giants, a new chip system needs a premise + three conditions if it wants to be built, sold well and used well.</p><p>One premise is that the high threshold caused by IDM mode must be lowered or even disintegrated in some way. As mentioned above, Motorola's 680x0 family and PowerPC both lost to the industrial law of \"scale effect of heavy assets\" in the end. If this high wall still stands in front of new players, it will be difficult for the new chip system to succeed.</p><p>What broke this high wall was the Foundry model. Especially after entering 2000, companies such as TSMC and Samsung successfully narrowed the gap with Intel, so that the Foundry model with general recognition before continued to grow. The status quo of IDM dominating the world was broken, and the division of labor appeared in the industrial chain, which greatly lowered the threshold for new entrants.</p><p>Or take the example in Chapter 1: If both A and B produce the same kind of chips, and A produces 1 million chips and B produces 300,000 chips, if both are in IDM mode, then the cost of B will always be much higher than that of A. However, if B finds C to OEM, and C can let B share the fixed cost with customers in the same process, such as D, E, F, etc., then B's cost may be close to or even equal to A's.</p><p>The rise of ARM has further lowered the cost of new entrants. Compared with manufacturing, although the design link of the chip costs less money, it is expensive and the success rate is very low to design a new CPU architecture from scratch. ARM's authorization mode and conscience charging have helped enterprises that want to own their own chips greatly reduce the design cost and further lower the threshold.</p><p>Simple summary: that is, IDM mode = design + manufacturing + packaging and testing. After being disassembled and divided into labor, ARM will help you lower the design cost, TSMC will help you lower the manufacturing cost, and the packaging and testing will be transferred to the mainland to reduce the cost. In this way, even if the amount of Apple chips is only 5% of Intel's, the cost of a single chip will not be much higher than that of Intel, and it may even be leveled.</p><p>Therefore, when TSMC and ARM successfully reconstructed the industrial chain after 2000, a large number of emerging Fabless (Fabless) chip companies rose up, Qualcomm began to enter the chip field with the authorization of ARM, and Nvidia relied on TSMC's foundry to make the first generation GeForce graphics card. Even AMD sold the factory in the end, all relying on foundry to fight with Intel until now.</p><p>There is a premise for Apple to return to coremaking. What are the three conditions? One is funds, the other is customers, and the third is teams.</p><p>The first is funding. After the restructuring of the industrial chain, the funds needed to make the core are actually abundant and frugal. If you get a 90nm embedded chip, millions can get on the bus; But if you want to build complex processor chips (which Apple wants to do), you can't start construction without $1 billion. Of course, for Apple after releasing the iPhone, they have forgotten how to write the word threshold.</p><p>The second is the customer. It is the first step to make the chip, the second step to sell it, and the third step to find the problem feedback iteration in the process of using it. The latter two require customers who are willing to risk their lives to jump with you. Such customers are scarcer than pandas, especially in the consumer electronics market, and a chip rollover may be doomed. Apple and Huawei, both have natural advantages in this regard.</p><p>The third is the team. The more the chip is designed, the closer it is to the sciences of computers, semiconductors and mathematics. To make a processor-level chip, not only top engineers, but also top scientists are needed. In Silicon Valley, the birthplace of computers and semiconductors, although these talents can't be said to be everywhere, they are definitely more than anywhere else in the world.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9c3bdc53fca9684a19e69d638e8a7a66\" tg-width=\"550\" tg-height=\"440\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/>Apple chips undergoing durability testing, 2018</p><p>After Apple decided to make a core, it immediately started the search for top talents-or top gods.</p><p>The first to join the team is Daniel Dobberpuhl, known as \"Big D\". He previously led two prominent RISC projects at DEC – Alpha and StronARM. Alpha chip once shone brightly in the field of workstations and servers. Although it eventually lost to Intel, it had far-reaching influence, and you can even see its shadow on the light of Shenwei Taihu Lake.</p><p>StrongARM ended up with almost the same ending, and was finally sold to Intel by DEC together with Big D himself. Dobberpuh left Intel for a few days and founded SiByte, focusing on MIPS architecture chips, and developed rapidly. A few years later, this company with only 120 people was acquired by Broadcom at a sky-high price of $2 billion, and Big D was completely financially free.</p><p>In 2003, Dobberpuh left his job again, founded PA Semi, and turned to PowerPC architecture chips. By 2008, Apple, which was already planning to make a core, acquired PA Semi. At this time, there were only 40 people in Apple's chip team, and PA Semi brought more than 150 people at once, which greatly strengthened the depth of the team's bench.</p><p>Long before the acquisition of PA Semi, Apple had already dug Jim Keller, another great god in this company. Dobberpuh is good at serial entrepreneurship, while Jim Keller's traditional skill is crazy job-hopping. DEC, Apple, AMD, Intel and Tesla have all stayed, but he has left legendary works everywhere-such as the Zen processor that revived AMD's glory.</p><p>The last great god is Johny Srouji, who Apple poached from IBM. Johny Srouji, of Arab descent, was born in Israel to a carpenter father, who grew up with excellent academic achievements and was admitted to the Israel Institute of Technology, known as the \"MIT of the Middle East\", and is fluent in Hebrew, Arabic, French and English. After graduation, he joined IBM's research and development center in Israel.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9883b1b667e9e6c76c2e810657690b96\" tg-width=\"550\" tg-height=\"367\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/>Cook and Johny Srouji (second from left)</p><p>After IBM temporarily emerged, Johny Srouji was poached by Intel, and after eight years of work, he was dug back by IBM to be responsible for the research and development of high-performance computing chip POWER7. After a few back and forth, he became a rising star in the semiconductor industry. Apple's head of hardware, Bob Mansfield, highly recommended Johny Srouji to Jobs, who decisively hired him.</p><p>Again: One's fate depends on one's own struggle, of course, but it also needs to consider the course of history. Most of the people on Apple's chip team have dedicated their careers to the ill-fated RISC, but in the rush to the Intel x86 empire, they have basically lost more than won. Like Apple, these people finally waited for the moment when the industrial ecology changed drastically.</p><p>Many great gods returned to their positions, and Johny Srouji was appointed as the head of the entire chip team. He later recalled what Jobs told him: \"If Apple is to really stand out and provide users with truly unique and great products, the only way is to have your own chip-you have to control and own it.\"</p><p>It will take at least a few years for a new processor to go from design to mass production. So subsequent models of the original iPhone, including the 2008 iPhone 3G and 2009 iPhone 3GS, still use Samsung's chips. Meanwhile, Apple's acquisition continues, and the final piece of the planned puzzle is a Texas-based company called Intrinsity.</p><p>This company specializes in a technology called Fast14, which can accelerate the general-purpose core provided by ARM from 650MHz to 1GHz. In 2009, Samsung announced its cooperation with Intrinsity, and used their technology to build the \"Hummingbird\" core and S5PC110 chip-this chip was mounted on Samsung's first generation Galaxy S mobile phone, which sold worldwide and became the earliest challenger of iPhone.</p><p>After realizing the value of Intrinsity, Apple preempted Samsung to take Intrinsity into its bag, which led to Samsung no longer being able to use Intrinsity technology in the future. 2010 is also the beginning of Samsung and Apple's parting ways-Samsung boasts that it is the boss of Android camp and has gone to war with iPhone in an all-round way, while Apple still has to rely on Samsung for screens, flash memory and chips, so it can only bite its teeth and swallow it.</p><p>Under the background of the seemingly separate cooperation between the two companies and the surging undercurrent of cooperation, Apple's first-generation self-developed chip A4 was released in January 2010, which has the scene at the beginning of this article.</p><p>Apple's own team's contribution to A4 is actually not big. Most of the design work of A4 is completed by Samsung and Intrinsity, and it is actually identical twins with Samsung's S5PC110 chip. Therefore, when some disassembly mechanisms took microscopic photos and infrared imaging of the A4 die, and found that Apple's claimed self-research was the same as the S5PC110 core, ridicule overwhelmed.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a1722e3d2e2e8719cc9245cadf0f062e\" tg-width=\"550\" tg-height=\"346\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/>Compared with A4 and S5PC110, ARM cores are almost the same</p><p>But Johny Srouji and his team were hardly affected, and the addition of Intrinsity's team of more than 100 people made Apple even more powerful. Several teams of different backgrounds gathered to focus on the A5 and race against time to get the A5 to ride the iPhone 4S, which is scheduled to be released in 2011.</p><p>On the other hand, Jobs asked Cook to send his general and vice president of operations Jeff Williams to Taiwan Province secretly to contact TSMC. Zhang Zhongmou personally received him at home, and the two sides reached an agreement drinking red wine: Apple will transfer the chip foundry order to TSMC in the future, and TSMC will guarantee to prepare $9 billion in factory construction funds and 6,000 workers to ensure production capacity.</p><p>Soon, the whole world will witness the shocking process of Apple's chip team killing God and Buddha killing Buddha.</p><p><b>God blocks killing God, Buddha blocks killing Buddha</b></p><p>Driving north from bustling Tel Aviv, Israel, through the salty sea breeze, you can reach the city of Herzliya, bathed in the Mediterranean sun, within 30 kilometers.</p><p>It's far from Gaza and the West Bank, and you'll hardly see the white smoke streaking across the sky as the Iron Dome intercepts Hamas rockets. People enjoy white sand beaches, dense cafes and lush boulevards, and a lifestyle less like the Middle East and more like California in a quiet small town where more than 1,000 employees are working on chips for Apple.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cc131ec5f85f5aae71673b2bf7cad5f9\" tg-width=\"550\" tg-height=\"289\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/>Apple's R&D Center in Herzliya</p><p>Apple's deployment of a huge army in Israel is related to Johny Srouji being an Israeli on the one hand, and because Israel itself is a rich mine of semiconductor talents on the other hand. Since 2011, Apple has set up the second largest overseas R&D center in this place 12,000 kilometers away from Silicon Valley through recruitment and acquisition, almost all of which are chip-related.</p><p>It is difficult to find hints of Apple's core-making in Levant news such as the Syrian civil war and the rise of ISIS, and Apple's silence has made Johny Srouji's team mysterious, and he himself is rarely interviewed. Then Bloomberg finally got an interview in 2016, and the title was straightforward: The most important Apple executive you've never heard of.</p><p>In fact, this kind of deliberate not only increases rumors and speculation, but also has no \"low-key\" effect-because the powerful performance of A series chips has hit everyone's faces.</p><p>In 2010, A4 had mixed praises, but the two dual-core chips, A5 in 2011 and A6 in 2012, have already aligned with the quad-core chips of Android in the same period in performance. In 2013, Apple took the lead in launching the world's first 64-bit processor A7, leaving Qualcomm and Samsung, which are still in the 32-bit era, far behind. Since then, mobile SoC has entered the 64-bit era.</p><p>To understand Apple chips, you need to know some facts first: ARM actually sells two things, one is called \"architecture license\", and customers can design their own kernels according to the instruction set architecture; One is called \"public version kernel\", which is the kernel designed by ARM for you. Customers can buy it home and integrate it into their own chips.</p><p>To use an analogy that may not be appropriate: \"architecture license\" is like selling ingredients. ARM helps you wash and peel them off. You don't have to build a vegetable garden to grow it yourself (to lower the chip design cost), but whether the final dish tastes good or not depends on your level of frying and cooking; The latter is ready-made food made with the above ingredients. Go home and put some chopped green onion to cook it simply, and you can soon make up a banquet table.</p><p>Of course, \"ready-made food\" sounds simple, but there are not many people in the world who can do well, and even fewer people dare to try to cook and develop private kernels by themselves. For example, the \"architecture license\" of ARMv8 has only 15 customers in the world. Apple's A4 and A5 are both buying public version cores, which is equivalent to eating \"ready-made food\" for two years. Since the A6 chip equipped with iPhone5, Apple wants to cook by itself.</p><p>Johny Srouji's team first launched the Swift kernel based on ARMv7 architecture, which made A6 well received; At the end of 2011, ARM released a new ARMv8 architecture. Apple sprinted to come up with the Cyclone core based on the new architecture within 12 months. The A7 equipped with the new core became the world's first 64-bit processor, pulling down Qualcomm and Samsung by a large part.</p><p>After that, the story is familiar. From A7 to A16 released last year, Apple's A-series chips basically crushed the same chips in Android camp.</p><p>The chip design ability tempered by the A series has not surprisingly \"overflowed\" to other hardware innovations of Apple. In 2014, Apple released the first generation of Apple Watch, equipped with Apple's self-developed S series chips; In 2016, Apple released the first generation of Airpods, equipped with self-developed W series chips (later replaced by H series).</p><p>Airpods are a great example of chip-driven hardware innovation. Before the advent of Airpods, most products on the market needed to connect two headphones with solid lines, while Apple realized Bluetooth signal monitoring through W1 chip, eliminated the cumbersome transmission line, and greatly improved the experience of delay, noise reduction and battery life, basically redefining the product of \"wireless Bluetooth headphones\".</p><p>In 2018, Apple, whose internal strength has improved by leaps and bounds, finally made an earth-shattering decision: to re-aim its gun at Intel.</p><p>This is probably the hardest bone to crack since the birth of the semiconductor industry. As mentioned above, Intel has been running vertically and horizontally in the half century since its birth, and its feet are full of the bones of challengers. Not only is the x86 empire close to a monopoly on PCs, but it has also pushed the RISC camp out of the market in the field of servers and high-performance computers (HPC).</p><p>Since Apple dares to challenge Intel here, it will definitely not fight an unprepared battle. In fact, after years of silent development, the number of Johny Srouji's team has exceeded 4,000, and its combat effectiveness is explosive. More importantly, many technologies of A series can be used with M series (the code name of Apple's desktop chips).</p><p>For example, based on ARMv8 architecture, Apple has designed two cores with cool names, Firestorm and Icestorm. The former has high performance and the latter has low energy consumption. The A14 chip released in September 2020 used these two cores (2+4), while the M1 chip released in November 2020 also used (4+4).</p><p>Of course, designing desktop chips is much more complex than mobile phone chips, and the probability of rollover is also very high. Therefore, when Apple informed Intel of the decision to change the core, the latter was shocked and reminded of the risks. Apple said, \"This is not the first time for us (to change the chip)\", and frequently complained about Intel's toothpaste-like product upgrade, which was very much like acting in a movie: the determination to break up.</p><p>Not only Apple is dissatisfied with Intel's toothpaste squeezing, but many users in Wintel camp also secretly hope that Intel can be a little under pressure; Those fruit powders who have seen the crushing-level combat effectiveness of Apple's A series chips are naturally looking forward to it; For observers of the semiconductor industry, this matter is even more significant-northwest Shanxi has not been a pot of porridge for a long time, and the bigger you Li Yunlong make, the better.</p><p>In November 2020, Cook released the Macbook Pro powered by the M1 chip. All chip players held their breath the moment they showed off the M1's performance.</p><p>M1 has a total of 16 billion transistors. It integrates 8-core CPU (4 large and 4 small), 8-core GPU, image processing unit (ISP), neural network unit, etc. on a silicon-based SoC, and greatly improves the internal communication bandwidth through unified memory technology. The performance of single-core and multi-core can be simply understood as between Intel's i7 and i9.</p><p>The powerful performance of M1 reached the point where Intel watched silence and AMD watched tears. Even Apple's internal executives were surprised by the performance of M1. After the press conference, Craig Federighi, the head of Apple's software, and John Ternus, the head of Apple's hardware, bluntly said in an interview [11]: Apple itself could not predict that the M1 chip would bring such a great progress.</p><p>Apple executives may still be suspected of Wang Po selling melons, but Macbook sales will not lie: in 2021, notebook sales soared due to the epidemic, but Macbook grew the fastest, with a market share of more than 10% and a share expansion of 24%; As the pandemic ebbed in 2022, against the backdrop of declining notebook sales worldwide, Macbook continued to grow, with its share already reaching 14%.</p><p>After M1, Johny Srouji's team continued to siege the city, launching M1 Pro, M1 Max, M1 Ultra and M2 chips one after another, and gradually replacing the Intel chips of other Apple desktop devices. Johny Srouji also began to go to the front desk, frequently appearing at Apple's press conferences, and there were even rumors that he would take over as Intel's CEO.</p><p>Although Apple will not sell M-series chips to the outside world to go to war directly with Intel, the 30-year wrestling between the two companies has finally come to an end.</p><p>Not only Intel, but also Apple has intersected with almost all semiconductor giants: it abandoned IBM and Motorola, which directly led to their withdrawal from the chip field; It cut Samsung and propped up its rival TSMC; It suppressed Qualcomm, so that all Android machines were afraid to say that they were comparable to A series chips...</p><p>A book of Apple's core making, half of the history of the rise of Silicon Valley. Looking back, this counterattack of Apple's core-making is so long that this story almost covers most influential figures and events in Silicon Valley-from the origin of integrated circuits to the revolution of personal computers, from the hegemony of Wintel Alliance to the counterattack of RISC camp, from the birth of ARM to the rise of TSMC...</p><p>What can we learn from an Odyssean homecoming story?</p><p><b>Apocalypse</b></p><p>If you simply ask what reference is to the story of Apple's core-making, then the answer is simple: almost no reference.</p><p>Apple is a company that took off at the same frequency as Silicon Valley, and its history itself is part of Silicon Valley. Steve Jobs, a native of Silicon Valley, had a close personal relationship with many chip gods in textbooks. For example, Robert Noyce, the founder of Fairchild and Intel, even joked to his wife: If Steve Jobs called me so late again, I would kill him.</p><p>The aforementioned \"one premise and three conditions\" of core making, in addition to the \"premise\", separate funds (profit margin and capital reserve), team (talent density and appeal) and customers (market share and user stickiness), coupled with the characteristics of the founder, you will find that Apple's success cannot be replicated not only by Chinese companies, but also by no second company in the United States.</p><p>If this cool article can have any inspiration, then the author mentions a less grand angle: computers and chips are \"industries\", but they are even more \"science\".</p><p>The \"bright thread\" of Apple's core-making story is how a consumer electronics company tolerates how to break out and finally understand the grudge; The \"dark line\" is the thirty-year struggle between two different chip design concepts of CISC and RISC-this struggle is essentially the extension of the development of the \"science\" of Computer Architecture in the \"industry\".</p><p>What Characterizes Industry? Output value, profits and taxes, market share, employed population. What Characterizes Science? Theories, laws, ideas, underlying breakthroughs. Computers and chips are industries, of course, but they are two sciences that were born less than 100 years ago and are still evolving and breaking through. The elements in Apple's story remind us of the fact that the United States is where these two sciences originated.</p><p>What makes up the edifice of the two sciences of computers and chips are transistors, integrated circuits, Unix, compilers, Ethernet, GUI (user graphical interface), RISC, databases, TCP/IP, object-oriented programming, laser printing, artificial intelligence, floating point computing, neural networks, machine learning…almost all of them appear in the United States.</p><p>Industry is easy to transfer, but science is not easy to transfer, or science can't be transferred. Only by carefully cultivating scientific spirit can we blossom and bear fruit on our own land. Although many industries in the United States have been transferred, they still control the innovation of computer and chip science. So far, almost all of the more than 70 ACM Turing Award winners are Americans.</p><p>Understanding this makes it easy to answer many people's questions: Why is my industry so large and so easy to get stuck?</p><p>Of course, considering the starting point, it is not easy to start the industry first. After all, when Apple was founded, the Gang of Four was still on stage. At the 1984 Los Angeles Olympics, Western journalists used IBM PCs, but Chinese journalists only had pen and paper. \"Of the 7,000 journalists covering the Olympics worldwide, only Chinese wrote their reports by hand,\" AFP wrote.</p><p>In the more than 40 years of rapid economic progress, both the heads of large enterprises and the section chiefs of 18th-tier cities are accustomed to considering problems with the thinking of \"industry\". Just like Yang Yuanqing's conversation with Musk in 2014, the former asked the latter: In 2013, Lenovo sold a total of 115 million devices. How many cars did Tesla sell?</p><p>Parameters such as output value, scale and market share are indeed of great significance, but they should not be obscured by them. In the past, too many enterprises were keen on scale, piling heads and price wars. After achieving certain results, they dared not climb up the chain, but were still immersed in low-quality zero-sum games.</p><p>Does industrial thinking matter? Of course, it is important, and its significance to developing countries cannot be overemphasized. However, for a \"hard-working\" country that is climbing upward, scientific thinking must not be lacking. In recent years, there is often a common phenomenon: hard bones are rarely chewed, but seemingly easy feelings are rolled by a bunch of people.</p><p>The whole society should encourage Chinese technology companies to devote their energy to cutting-edge scientific breakthroughs, rather than urging them to plant trees and donate money. And they themselves should not be fooled by those scale indicators-rich countries like Apple have spent thirty years sharpening their swords, not to mention those whose profit margins are often only in the single digits?</p><p>In recent years, more and more companies have emerged in China that rely on \"technology\" to make money, and have established a right to speak in the global industrial chain. However, at the moment of stuck neck, people can't help but sigh: It would be nice if there were more enterprises like xxx. Through some boiling data, we often find that the gap in many industries is still huge.</p><p>Know yourself and your enemy, an important confidant. To paraphrase what Fan Zhiyi said after the national football team lost to Thailand: \"Be pragmatic and understand the concept of this football first.\" For many industries in China, there are indeed too many things to understand. All industry participants need to be patient, patient and patient again.</p><p></body></html></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> source：<a href=\"https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/2wE5hdpJHuoc4T7_ZjrywQ\">远川研究所</a></p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f95af5b53a826d7276ad78de75357175","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/2wE5hdpJHuoc4T7_ZjrywQ","is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1192151009","content_text":"2010年1月，癌症晚期的乔布斯在第一代iPad发布会上，首次向世人展示了苹果自研的A4芯片。这枚45nm制程的芯片由三星代工，内置ARM的Cortex-A8内核，拥有1GHz的运行频率，性能突出。尽管它的历史意义重大，但在长达一个多小时的iPad发布会上，乔布斯对于A4芯片只用了寥寥数语带过，花的时间加起来还不到20秒。这是一种刻意的低调，苹果在发布会前对自研芯片三缄其口，这跟苹果造芯的历史有关：作为微型计算机最重要的普及者之一，苹果跟集成电路技术几乎同时起步，在成立后的30多年里数次向芯片发起冲锋，结果却是屡战屡败。果不其然，敏感的媒体嗅到了线索，并大都对苹果自研芯片这件事持嘲讽态度，普遍认为“A4芯片参考了三星设计，苹果厚着脸皮把自己牌子贴了上去”。科技媒体Ars Technica则认为A4设计平庸，“没什么值得大书特书的”。理性去看，苹果自研手机芯片的确困难重重。2010年的移动芯片市场早已巨头林立：高通的Snapdragon横扫千军，三星的Exynos蓄势待发，Nvidia的Tegra雄心勃勃，甚至连Intel的Atom也觉得自己能行，试图分一杯羹。但人们低估了苹果想撬开铁板的决心：一年之后，苹果在iPhone4S发布会上展示了第二代芯片A5，CPU性能是A4的两倍，GPU性能是A4的9倍，性能提升巨大，这让业界意识到一个事实：苹果已经的确拿到了那张通往半导体制高点的昂贵门票。遗憾的是，布局者乔布斯却没能目睹接下来的故事。在病床上看完A5亮相的直播后不久，他就撒手人寰。十年后，苹果已经构建了一个包括A系列（手机&平板）、M系列（桌面PC）、H系列（耳机）、S系列（手表）等多个产品线的半导体帝国，尤其是当库克在2020年底向人们展示替代Intel的M1芯片时，人们感受到难以言表的震撼。苹果M1芯片2000年之后，两个芯片行业新入局者的故事最曲折，一个是华为海思，一个就是Apple Silicon，前者呈现的是张巡守睢阳式的悲壮，后者则更像是一部描写奥德修斯返乡的荷马史诗，两者都或多或少改变了中美科技战的节奏。苹果造芯是一部连续的历史，以A4为界，before和after的故事都玩味：A4之前，苹果是竹篮打水、屡战屡败；A4之后，苹果是神挡杀神、佛挡杀佛，三星、高通、Intel这些全球芯片顶级玩家，或被苹果击败，或被苹果抛弃。这是一个关于商业的故事，但更是一个关于计算机这门“科学”的故事。150美元的蝴蝶翅膀许多年之后，面对M1芯片，史蒂夫·沃兹尼亚克（Steve Wozniak）可能会想起第一次见到Intel 8080的那个遥远的晚上。作为苹果的联合创始人，沃兹尼亚克在1975年——苹果成立前的一年——的“家酿计算机俱乐部”聚会上看到了那个出现在《大众电子》1月刊封面、号称第一台个人计算机的Altair 8800，以及驱动这台电脑的Intel 8080芯片。印有Altair 8800的杂志封面人类自1950年代末进入晶体管和集成电路时代之后，电子计算机的尺寸就在每年以肉眼可见的速度变小。这个进程由年轻的硅谷推动，无数新兴的公司在这片热土上竞赛。到了1970年代，计算机离走入寻常百姓家，只差几层窗户纸了。Altair 8800被公认为点燃了微型计算机革命的火种，它启发了比尔·盖茨和保罗·艾伦推出了微软历史上的第一款产品——BASIC编程语言，也让沃兹尼亚克萌生了自己组装一台计算机的想法，唯一的问题在于：Intel 8080太贵了。一台组装好的Altair 8800售价621美元，但8080散装片就要170美元，沃兹尼亚克形容“比我一个月的房租还贵”，于是他就开始寻找替代品：先是找到了摩托罗拉6800，通过熟人买只要40美元/枚，后来又找到了6800的大牌平替——MOS Technologies公司制造的MOS 6502，20美元就能上车。当沃兹尼亚克把组装好的微型计算机展示给乔布斯的时候，后者大吃一惊，并意识到这可能是一次伟大的商业机会。对于沃兹尼亚克放弃Intel芯片，乔布斯也很满意，他认为“技术只是手段，最终是为了改善消费体验。”这台由20美元廉价芯片驱动的微型计算机，便是苹果第一代产品Apple I。就这样，苹果的故事开始了。这一年，乔布斯20岁，沃兹尼亚克25岁，计算机世界仍由IBM大型机主宰，Altair仍是极客们的玩具，英特尔还在硅周期的首次衰退中艰难生存。两个史蒂夫无法意识到：在芯片上省下的150美元，未来要花千万倍的代价补回来。1977年，苹果推出第一款成熟产品Apple II，销量疯涨。它以漂亮的外观和内置键盘示人，沃兹尼亚克的编程技术和乔布斯的设计审美被体现地淋漓尽致。但这些长板掩盖了一个问题：Apple II 仍然在使用廉价的MOS 6502处理器。而1981年底苹果的Apple III，CPU仍然是这款老旧的6502，而竞争对手IBM已经用上了Intel的8088芯片，性能是当年沃兹尼亚克舍弃的8080的10倍左右。简单对比：MOS 6502晶体管数量只有3000多，而Intel 8088却高达29000。廉价但“够用”的芯片能够让苹果保持极高毛利率，但大前提是硬件不会成为短板，至少不能拖软件的后腿。显然，诞生在1975年的6502芯片难以支持1980年代的计算机，频繁失灵的电路板和缓慢的运行速度最终让Apple III销量惨淡。来自竞争对手的压力也越来越大。1981年，IBM一改平时笨重的身段，推出了使用微软MS-DOS和Intel 8088的兼容个人计算机（又称 IBM PC），获得巨大成功，并把除苹果之外的几乎所有个人计算机厂商都拉进了“微软+Intel”阵营。而那会的Intel还没有转型做牙膏，同期发布芯片性能沿着摩尔定律一日千里，1974年推出8080，1978年推出8086，1982年推出80186和80286，此后便是80386、80486以及划时代的Pentium——其中文名更是成为一整代人的回忆：奔腾。但在早期错过后，以乔布斯的性格很难再重投Intel的怀抱，尤其是Intel已经是敌对阵营的核心骨干。好在那会儿硅谷能跟Intel掰手腕的公司有不少，摩托罗拉就是其中之一。1976年Intel内部正在开发16位的8086，摩托罗拉得知后决定直接干一票儿大的——你既然搞16位，那我就直接上32位。经过4年的研发，1980年摩托罗拉推出了性能强悍的Motorola 68000芯片。Motorola 68000芯片68000芯片又称“68k”，意思是芯片内部有68000个晶体管，它的性能大概是Intel 8086的两倍左右（价格也更贵），因此被广泛用在惠普、Sun、DEC的高端机以及对性能要求高的游戏机上。对于急欲寻求新芯片、又不想委身Intel的乔布斯来说，更是久旱逢甘霖。因此决定苹果命运的新产品Macintosh（也就是第一代的Mac）决定使用68000芯片，项目经理Jef Raskin本来想用性能低但便宜的摩托罗拉6809，但被吃过亏的乔布斯一口否决，并亲自出马把68k的批发价从125美元/枚砍到了35美元/枚。1984年1月24日，一代经典Macintosh正式发布。由《银翼杀手》导演执导的广告“1984”将苹果包装成反IBM奥威尔式统治的反叛者，惊艳了所有人，乔布斯也泪撒发布会现场。Mac的问世，给80年代的PC革命浪潮烙下了最深的印迹。发布第一代Macintosh的乔布斯，1984年68000芯片的确不负众望，其强劲的性能有力支撑了炫丽的图形界面和方便的鼠标操作。但第一代Mac却在其他方面掉了链子，比如内存只有128K，后来升级到512k也仍然不够用（至少需要1000K）。经过发售前期的热销后，曾被赞誉“将计算机技术与艺术完美结合”的Mac就因为其缓慢的运行速度，销量大幅下滑。1985年春，试图罢免CEO斯卡利的乔布斯被后者反将一军，联合董事会赶出了公司。乔布斯走了，但他当时选定的68000芯片却被继续委以重任。从1985年到1994年，Mac的后续版本全部都采用680x0家族芯片，从68000一直到68060。摩托罗拉的680x0家族，也是当时不多地能跟Intel 80x86家族分庭抗礼的势力。没有拜入Intel x86架构的阵营，让苹果避免了沦为给“Intel Inside”打工的角色——这类角色最后被惠普、Dell和联想所扮演。但这一选择也给苹果带来了潜在的隐患：当Intel沿着摩尔定律狂飙的时候，摩托罗拉这条细狗能行吗？事实上，尽管680x0家族芯片在某些性能上不输Intel 80x86家族，但Intel在出货量方面碾压摩托罗拉，而当时的芯片产业基本都是IDM垂直整合模式，设计制造封测一把抓，这种模式存在一个规则：重资产导致的规模经济效应。举一个例子：假如A和B两家芯片公司都生产某类型，A是行业老大B是老二，A生产了100万枚，B生产了30万枚，B的盈利会是A的30%吗？答案是否定的。不但到不了30%，可能连3%都到不了，更有可能的情况是A赚钱，B亏钱。一颗CPU售价可能只有30美元，但固定成本（研发投入和生产线）可能要几亿美金，造的芯片越多，每一枚芯片上分摊的成本才能越低。而Intel x86架构芯片和摩托罗拉680x0家族芯片销量的差距，远比100万枚和30万枚的差距大。这让摩托罗拉越来越难以跟上步伐，新款芯片的开发经常延期，比如原本计划要在1989年发布的68040，前后拖了整整一年，差点儿让苹果的新产品翻车。但苹果又毫无办法，还得小心伺候着摩托罗拉，享尽了受制于人的苦恼。幸运或者不幸，乔布斯已经没机会站在第一线去解决这些难题了。接下来的十年，他将以一个旁观者的身份目睹了苹果陷入了一个疲于应对“Intel+微软”阵营、尝试造芯却又屡战屡败、最终市场份额被步步蚕食的恶性循环。没人知道如果当年沃兹选择Intel会发生什么，但毫无疑问，那省下的150美元，一定是改变了某些历史进程的蝴蝶翅膀。令人绝望的90年代在两个Steve都还在苹果的1981年，同在加州的两个名叫David的人则做了一项影响深远的工作。1981年，加州大学伯克利教授David Patterson和博士生David Ditzel发表了“The Case for a Reduced Instruction Set Computer”这篇论文，其中Reduced Instruction Set Computer中文译名为“精简指令计算机”，取其首字母作为缩略词，便是日后大名鼎鼎的——RISC。David Patterson（左）和Carlo Séquin，1981年有“精简指令计算机”，便有“复杂指令计算机”，即CISC。两者的区别可以简单理解为在采用RISC设计理念的处理器里，指令更短，长度统一，速度更快；而采用CISC设计理念的处理器里的指令大都冗长复杂，运行效率较低。在微处理器刚问世的那个年代（世界上第一款商用微处理器是Intel的4004，于1971年推出），设计者通常都需要绞尽脑汁来平衡成本和性能，指令集设计的缺陷也就顾不上了，因此早期主流的微处理器包括Intel 8080和摩托罗拉 68k，都可以被归类为CISC架构。这就是这篇论文出台的背景。两位作者它们重新定义了一种新的CPU设计方法——RISC，并将任何不满足RISC理念的处理器都归类为CISC。这让Intel十分沮丧，毕竟谁也不想人在家中坐，一顶“复杂”的帽子却从天上来砸了过来。在Intel不爽的同时，一直在试图寻找破局点的苹果却彷佛抓住了救命稻草。在80年代后期，IBM兼容机阵营（IBM、惠普、Dell等）也用上了微软的图形化操作系统——Windows，逐渐把苹果挤到了角落。尽管在桌面出版等几个高端领域仍然强势，但苹果必须不断提高硬件性能来守住最后的一亩三分地，芯片显然是一个好的突破口。而在RISC理念提出后，硅谷积极响应，斯坦福的MIPS、Sun公司的SPARC、DEC的Alpha等项目都取得了一定程度上的成功。这让苹果觉得“我上我也行”，加上摩托罗拉的芯片供应经常翻车，于是苹果管理层大手一挥：自己搞芯片。稳妥起见，苹果选择跟运营商AT&T合作，陆续启动了两个RISC项目：水瓶座（Aquarius）项目和霍比特人（Hobbit）项目，前者想用来替换摩托罗拉68000，作为Mac的主力芯片；后者则想用在正在研发的Newton掌上电脑上面。可惜，苹果毕竟在芯片设计领域毫无经验，而AT&T也早已不是那个凭借贝尔实验室号令天下的AT&T了，两个臭皮匠合在一起凑不出半个诸葛亮，“水瓶座”和“霍比特人”先后铩羽而归，几千万美元的研发经费都打了水漂。在此期间Intel x86架构却继续高歌猛进，甚至虚心学习RISC理念。在水瓶座项目被搁置的1989年，英特尔推出32位的80486，在x86系列芯片中首次使用RISC技术；1993年，英特尔推出奔腾处理器，开始了对CPU市场的长期垄断。苹果将“水瓶座”和“霍比特人”的失败归结于搭档的无能，因此在1990年，苹果选择了更强大的盟友一起造芯——老冤家IBM和老朋友摩托罗拉，三者组成了当年PC产业界最受人关注的“AIM联盟”（Apple、IBM、Motorola）。IBM和摩托罗拉各有各的心思：IBM搞了几年兼容PC机后，发现自己根本卷不过Dell和康柏这种后起之秀，有点后悔自己把PC芯片外包给了Intel；摩托罗拉的诉求则更简单：自己独自对抗Intel，约等于骑着雅迪去追奥迪，实在是扛不住了。新联盟信心十足。IBM很早就开始了RISC技术储备（甚至早于David Patterson提出RISC），80年代更是成功研发了基于RISC的POWER架构高端芯片，在服务器和工作站领域独霸一方。这次合作的计划，就是把POWER架构“下沉”到PC机上。而摩托罗拉虽然不太靠谱，但好歹拥有消费级芯片开发经验，加上苹果当时每年还能卖130万多台（1990年）终端电脑，确保新芯片的采购量能够突破盈亏平衡的规模线。因此AIM联盟决战Intel，可谓是八十万对六十万，优势在我。就这样，AIM联盟于1990年启动，新的芯片被命名为：PowerPC——在IBM原先的POWER一词后加上了“PC”两个字母。第一款芯片PowerPC 601的开发于1991年10月正式开始启动，历经21个月完成，并于1993年7月开始量产。值得一提的是，“换芯”是一项极其复杂的工程，大概要完成三件事：一是重写操作系统的底层代码，工程量浩大；二是搞定代码转化器，确保新芯片能兼容之前的软件；三是为软件开发商提供新的开发工具，并说服他们用起来。在PowerPC 601尚在研发的时候，苹果的工程师就已经在紧锣密鼓地准备，并在芯片量产前成功地完成绝大部分工作。攒下这些“心脏移植”的经验对苹果来说非常重要，因为这虽然是它第一次“换芯”，但绝对不是最后一次。1994年3月，第一代搭载PowerPC芯片的Mac在曼哈顿发布，苹果终于换芯成功，这也意味着摩托罗拉68000系列的谢幕。媒体对此不吝赞美。MacWorld评价：“苹果夺回了8年前失去的性能领先地位”。消费者反馈也非常积极，光是在预售阶段就卖出15万台；1995 年1月，销量突破100万台；而到了1995年年中，Power Mac几乎取代了之前所有搭载摩托罗拉680x0家族芯片的型号。换芯后，苹果频繁拿同期Intel的芯片来做对比：1997年，苹果宣称PowerPC G3性能是同期奔腾II的两倍；1999年，苹果宣称PowerPC G4是同期奔腾III的2.94倍；2003年，苹果宣称PowerPC G5更是吊打奔腾4——这种“遥遥领先”的口气，连余承东老师都直呼内行。Wintel阵营被吓傻了吗？没有。相反，他们的应对策略是：你打你的，我打我的。这种自信来自于哪儿？自信来自产业规律。上一章提到，重资产的IDM模式导致了芯片的规模效应，跟当年鏖战680x0家族时一样，x86芯片在成本方面始终压对方一头，甚至优势还在不断扩大——Intel市占率在1985年是50%，到了1995年则已经超过80%。没有规模，就没有利润；没有利润，就不可能有用来改善产品缺陷的足够资金。PowerPC由于是来自IBM服务器和工作站芯片的“下沉”，不可避免地带有功耗大，发热高的问题，但资金捉襟见肘的AIM联盟始终无法解决。比如号称性能吊打奔腾4的PowerPC G5，功耗极高，发热巨大，苹果不得不重新设计机箱结构才能容纳下巨大的散热器，高配版甚至需要安装一套水冷系统，这让人很多业界人士疯狂嘲讽：这货也好意思称自己是RISC？PowerPC G5芯片所占的巨大体积要说产品缺陷，x86架构的问题一点儿都不少，比如指令复杂，寄存器少，功耗也很高。但Intel凭借强大的资金实力，一手改善架构缺陷，一手狂砸制程工艺，不仅把RISC阵营挡在PC主流之外，还把服务器和HPC（高性能计算机）领域的份额给蚕食殆尽。Intel在PC、数据中心、HPC的市场占有率软件生态更是一道难以逾越的鸿沟。一个故事是：影像软件巨头Adobe靠苹果发家，第一代Photoshop就是只发在Mac系统。1993年Adobe重点转向Windows，乔布斯回归后请求Adobe多给Mac开发一些软件，比如Premiere，结果因为用户太少被当面拒绝，乔布斯至死都没原谅Adobe。90年代的WinTel联盟已经进入到了自我加强的良性循环：出货量大→摊薄CapEx→众多厂商采购→软件生态繁荣→消费者认可→出货量继续大增。PowerPC在凭借IBM的技术家底和RISC的先进性取得一定成果后，还是无法打破这个循环，也无法构建自己的循环。评价一款CPU是否成功主要看三点：架构、制程、软件生态。架构靠先天遗传，制程靠后天努力，软件生态则靠合纵连横。RISC架构的确给了PowerPC一些先天优势，但后面两个的短板实在差距太大，AIM联盟忙活半天，发现自己骑的还是雅迪。难道真的没有破局点了吗？其实是有的。历史告诉我们，再牢固的商业壁垒和护城河，都无法做到千秋万载一统江湖。只不过苹果寻找的破局点，并不在自己身上，而是在于两个当时名气还不大的名字：一个叫台积电，一个叫ARM。而后者，恰恰就是苹果在绝望的90年代埋下的一颗种子。打不过要不就投降？硅谷早已天下闻名，但众所不周知的是，英国有个低配版的硅谷——硅沼（Silicon Fen）。硅沼指的是英国剑桥郡周边的一片区域，因为地处不列颠岛一片沼泽地（Fenlands）的南端，所以起了一个古怪的名字。这里大约等于上海的张江或者深圳的粤海街道，聚集了大批高科技公司，其中最有名的就是成立于1990年的Arm。Arm的诞生跟RISC浪潮也息息相关。早在1983年，Arm公司的前身Acorn Computer受伯克利Patterson教授的RISC论文启发，想设计一款基于RISC理念的芯片，于是便启动了一个名叫Acorn RISC Machine项目，其首字母缩写便是ARM。Acorn公司没有制造能力，便委托美国公司VLSI Technology代工，并在1985年成功出芯。后来苹果的工程师寻找摩托68000的替代品，有一次使用ARM2芯片在模拟68000环境运行Mac软件，发现居然跑得比68000更快，便将ARM列为备选。到80年代末，苹果跟AT&T合作的Hobbit（霍比特人）项目搁浅，于是ARM芯片便成了天坑项目“Newton掌上电脑”的主芯片。苹果想干脆备胎转正吧，于是向Acorn提议成立合资公司，条件是Acorn必须向新公司转让ARM所有知识产权和12名核心员工。Acorn公司店小利薄，自然一口应允，而给ARM芯片代工的VLSI表示也想上车。于是1990年，三家成立合资公司，苹果投资300万美元占股30%（后来上升到43%），新公司叫做Advanced RISC Machine（改了一个单词），缩写还是ARM。跟逐渐陷入困境的苹果相比，ARM公司反而越做越顺，凭借低功耗芯片技术和特殊的商业模式（向其他公司授权芯片架构），ARM公司在1993年便实现了盈利，在1998年完成了上市，股价更是趁着90年代末的科技股泡沫大涨。因此，乔布斯在1997年回归苹果后，惊喜地发现斯卡利居然给他留了这么一份厚礼。乔布斯在被驱逐出苹果的12年（1985-1997）里经历曲折，本文不再赘述。1997年，他创办的NeXT公司被苹果收购，乔布斯以特别顾问的身份回归，此时苹果的PC市场份额已由16%跌至4%。到了1996年，苹果亏损10亿美金，账面现金一度只够维持3个月的运营。而乔布斯也变化巨大。从1985年开始，他见证了苹果的衰落、英特尔的制霸、AIM联盟的挣扎，见证了昔日名气远不如他的盖茨称为世界首富；他经历了父亲的逝世，也拥有了美满的家庭生活，尽管仍然桀骜不驯，但他务实了很多。中年略显发福的乔布斯，1997年比如在重新担任CEO后，乔布斯第一时间就给盖茨打电话，恳求微软给苹果投资1.5亿美金，并继续开发Mac版的Word和Excel。在谈判中乔布斯放低身段，好话说尽，甚至承诺把微软的IE浏览器当作Mac的默认浏览器——任何一个用过IE的人，都明白这有多么屈辱。然后乔布斯大刀阔斧地砍掉了苹果绝大多数的产品线，把型号从几百款压缩到10款以内，并裁掉3000多人。在砍掉的项目里，就包括投入无数资金、但销量极差的“Newton”掌上电脑，也是当时苹果唯一使用ARM芯片的项目。而对于风头正劲的ARM，乔布斯的决定务实到有一些残酷：抛售股票，给苹果救命。并非乔布斯看不到ARM的价值，而是砍掉Newton之后，苹果在ARM擅长的低功耗场景里已经没有任何产品了，而此时苹果最重要的任务是续命，而非继续挑战Intel。最终，苹果通过减持拿到了数亿美元，为自己的研发输血。1998年，苹果发布了突破性的iMac，大获成功，并带动苹果当年成功扭亏，盈利3.09亿美金；2001年，苹果发布了iPod，这款能装1000首歌曲的播放器立即风靡了全世界，到2007年，iPod已经卖出了超过1亿台。苹果彻底新生。处理完生存问题之后，乔布斯才能腾出精力来思考：如何解决Mac越来越严重的芯片问题？如上一章所述，PowerPC芯片在经历了刚诞生时的惊艳之后，便越来越难以招架Intel的x86家族。乔布斯回归之后，跟负责制造PowerPC的摩托罗拉CEO高尔文大吵了一架，在电话里，他终于忍不住骂道：摩托罗拉的芯片烂透了。从那时开始，乔布斯就暗自策划推出AIM联盟。但苹果屡战屡败的造芯经历让他知道，在条件不成熟的情况下再去搞芯片无异自杀。于是他向董事会提出了一个非常务实，但让人大吃一惊的建议：要不然咱买Intel的芯片算了。苹果的董事会讨论了18个月，最终一致同意。跟上次切换到毕竟要论换芯，苹果如果说自己第二，谁敢说第一？而为了卖产品，乔布斯还不得不继续厚着脸皮在公开场合尬吹PowerPC的芯片，比如在2003年他评价即将发布的PowerPC G5时说道：“PowerPC G5让我们拥有了全球最快的桌面计算机……这是我们（跟IBM和摩托罗拉）长期、高效合作的开端。”但芯片问题已经没法再拖下去了。2001年初苹果发布搭载PowerPC G4芯片的PowerBook，之后5年都没能升级过芯片（Intel阵营每年都升级），销量一年比一年差，原因就是后续的PowerPC G5芯片因为散热问题，死活装不进去。从2004开始，苹果开始自己历史上的第二次换芯。Intel的CEO欧德宁（Paul Otellini）举双脚赞成。毕竟长期作为反Wintel阵营的旗手级人物，乔布斯宣布采用Intel芯片，约等于董明珠某天宣布格力要从美的方洪波那里买空调压缩机。Intel派出一支精干团队与苹果合作，在6个月的期限内成功完成了所有底层操作系统的代码修改工作。而苹果的工程师也开发了一款名叫Rosetta的翻译器，确保PowerPC上的软件能够在基于Intel x86芯片的Mac上平滑运行。2005年，乔布斯公开宣布Mac将转投Intel阵营，部分追随多年的果粉十分愤怒；而等到2006年1月乔布斯终于发布了基于Intel新品的iMac和Macbook Pro时，当看到Macbook Pro相比之前的PowerBook性能提升5倍、续航提升2小时的时候，发布会瞬间又变成大型真香现场。苹果第二次换芯成功了，十年后有媒体评价：乔布斯转向Intel，是苹果最成功的冒险之一。Intel CEO欧德宁向乔布斯交付芯片，2006年命运多舛的AIM联盟终于解散了，在2004年就听到风声的摩托罗拉干脆退出了芯片业务，把资产打包剥离出来成立了Freescale（飞思卡尔），专注于汽车和嵌入式市场。而IBM也把PowerPC的部分资产卖掉，保留了给游戏机用的芯片产品线——那是另外一个故事了。解决了芯片“卡脖子”问题的苹果，在桌面计算机市场（台式机+笔记本）的占有率不断回升，2007年已经超过了10%，而后面的故事就耳熟能详了：乔布斯在2007年发布了iPhone，苹果彻底走上神坛，一步步成为全球市值最大公司。在初代iPhone研发时，乔布斯曾想趁热打铁，劝说Intel为苹果开发移动芯片——那会的Intel还没来得及向世界展示他们在移动领域的惊人无能。但因为价格没谈拢，欧德宁事后回忆：谁能想到他搞的这款手机销量会是（预计的）100倍？于是苹果转向三星。第一代iPhone使用的是三星的S5L8900芯片——严格上讲这不是一款芯片，而是一个SoC片上系统（System on Chip），由一个ARM架构芯片和一个PowerVR芯片组成，采用90nm工艺，勉强够用。*为了读者通俗理解，我们后面仍然用芯片来指代SoC。三星的半导体业务发轫于90年代，由二代李健熙亲自布局，通过“反周期定律”一步步变成全球存储芯片的老大。2006年三星进入芯片代工领域，在技术上迅速追上台积电，并通过自研的S5L8900芯片吃下成为iPhone芯片的唯一供应商。但吃过单一供应商大亏的乔布斯，心中有一个挥之不去的隐忧，那就是：万一三星变成第二个摩托罗拉和IBM怎么办？而在2007年的iPhone发布会上，乔布斯就引用了Alan Kay的一句话：真正在意软件的人，应该自己造硬件。Alan Kay是谁？他是图灵奖获得者，是面向对象编程的发明者，他在施乐PARC领导开发了历史上第一个用户图形界面，直接启发了乔布斯的Macintosh和盖茨的Windows。援引Alan Kay的话，是不是意味着乔布斯又悟出了新的启发？也许，是时候彻底解决芯片问题了。但问题是：苹果经历了如此漫长的芯酸往事，这次会不一样吗？英雄集齐不问出处在巨头几乎垄断的背景下，一个新的芯片体系要想造得出、卖得好、用得爽，需要一个前提+三个条件。一个前提就是：IDM模式造成的高门槛，必须被某种方式所降低甚至瓦解。如前文所属，摩托罗拉680x0家族和PowerPC最后都是败给了“重资产的规模效应”这条产业规律，如果这堵高墙仍然横亘在新玩家的面前，新的芯片体系很难成功。打破这堵高墙的，就是晶圆代工（Foundry）模式，尤其是进入到2000年之后，台积电和三星等公司成功缩小了跟Intel之间的差距，让之前认可度一般的晶圆代工模式不断壮大，IDM一统江湖的现状被打破，产业链出现了分工，大幅度降低了新进入者的门槛。还是用第一章的例子：假如A和B都生产同一类芯片，A生产100万枚B生产30万枚，如果两者都是IDM模式，那么B的成本永远都比A高的多。但如果B找C去代工，C可以让B跟同一制程的客户比如D、E、F等一起分摊固定成本，那么B的成本就可能跟A接近甚至打平。而ARM的崛起又进一步拉低了新进入者的成本。相比制造而言，芯片的设计环节虽然花钱少一些，但如果从头开始设计一套新的CPU架构耗资巨大且成功率很低。而ARM的授权模式和良心收费，帮助想拥有自己芯片的企业大幅降低了设计成本，进一步拉低门槛。简单总结：就是IDM模式=设计+制造+封测，被拆解分工后，ARM帮你拉低设计成本，台积电帮你拉低制造成本，封测又转移到大陆成本降到低无可低，这样即使苹果芯片的量只有Intel的5%，单个芯片的成本也不会比Intel高太多，甚至有可能打平。于是，当台积电和ARM在2000年后成功重构了产业链后，大量新兴的Fabless（无晶圆厂）芯片公司崛起，高通借助ARM的授权开始进入芯片领域，英伟达依靠台积电的代工做出了第一代GeForce显卡，甚至连AMD最后都卖掉工厂，全靠代工才跟Intel拼到现在。苹果重返造芯的一个前提有了，三个条件是什么？一是资金，二是客户，三是团队。第一是资金。产业链重构之后，造芯所需的资金其实丰俭由人，你搞一款90nm的嵌入式芯片，几百万就能上车；但如果你要搞复杂的处理器芯片（也是苹果想做的），没有10亿美金基本别想动工。当然对发布iPhone后的苹果来说，门槛两个字怎么写他们已经忘了。第二是客户。芯片造出来是第一步，卖出去是第二步，在用的过程中发现问题反馈迭代是第三步，后两者都需要愿意舍命陪你跳坑的客户。这样的客户比熊猫还稀缺，尤其是消费电子市场，芯片的一个翻车可能就万劫不复。苹果和华为，在这方面都有天然优势。第三是团队。芯片越往上设计，就越离计算机、半导体、数学这几门科学越近，要做出处理器级别的芯片，不光需要顶级的工程师，更需要顶级的科学家。而在计算机和半导体的发源地硅谷，这些人才虽然不能说遍地都是，但绝对比全世界任何一个地方都多。正在做耐久性测试的苹果芯片，2018年苹果在决定造芯之后，立马就开始了顶级人才——或者说是顶级大神的搜罗工作。首先加入团队的是人称“大D哥”的Daniel Dobberpuhl。他曾在DEC先后领导过两个著名RISC项目——Alpha和StronARM。Alpha芯片曾在工作站和服务器领域光芒四射，虽然最终还是不敌Intel，但它影响深远，你甚至能在神威太湖之光上看到它的些许影子。StrongARM最后也是差不多同样结局，最后被DEC连同大D哥本人一起卖给了Intel。Dobberpuh在Intel没待几天就离职创办了SiByte，主攻MIPS架构芯片，发展迅猛，几年后这家只有120个人的公司就被Broadcom以20亿美元的天价收购，大D哥彻底财务自由。2003年，Dobberpuh又双叒离职，创办了PA Semi，转而搞PowerPC架构的芯片。到了2008年，已经在筹划造芯的苹果收购了PA Semi。此时苹果芯片团队只有40人，PA Semi一下子就带来了150多人，大大加强了团队板凳深度。早在收购PA Semi之前，苹果就已经把这家公司里的另一位大神Jim Keller给挖了过来。Dobberpuh擅长连续创业，Jim Keller的传统艺能则是疯狂跳槽，DEC、苹果、AMD、Intel、特斯拉都待过，但每个地方他都留下了传奇作品——比如重振AMD雄风的Zen处理器。最后一位大神，是苹果从IBM挖来的Johny Srouji。阿拉伯裔的Johny Srouji出生于以色列，父亲是一名木匠，他从小学习成绩优异，考入了被誉为“中东MIT”的以色列理工学院，精通希伯来语、阿拉伯语、法语和英语。毕业后他加入IBM在以色列的研发中心。库克和Johny Srouji（左二）在IBM暂露头角后，Johny Srouji被Intel挖走，工作八年后又被IBM反挖回去，负责高性能计算芯片POWER7的研发。几个来回之后，他成为半导体届一颗冉冉升起的新星。苹果硬件负责人Bob Mansfield向乔布斯极力推荐Johny Srouji，乔布斯果断雇佣了他。还是那句话：一个人的命运当然要靠自我奋斗，但是也要考虑历史进程。苹果芯片团队中大多数人的职业生涯都奉献给了命运多舛的RISC，但在向Intel x86帝国冲塔的过程中，基本上是败多胜少。这些人跟苹果一样，终于等到了产业生态出现剧烈变化这一刻。诸多大神归位，Johny Srouji被任命为整个芯片团队的头。他后来回忆乔布斯对他讲的一段话[]：“如果要让苹果真正脱颖而，出给用户提供真正独特和伟大的产品，唯一的方法就是拥有自己的芯片——你必须控制并拥有它。”一款新的处理器从设计到量产，至少需要几年的时间。因此初代iPhone的后续型号——包括2008年的iPhone 3G和2009年的iPhone 3GS仍然使用三星的芯片。同时，苹果的收购仍然继续，计划中的最后一块拼图，是一家位于德克萨斯州的名叫Intrinsity的公司。这家公司擅长一种名叫Fast14的技术，能够将ARM提供的通用内核从650MHz加速到1GHz。三星在2009年宣布跟Intrinsity合作，用他们的技术打造出了“蜂鸟”内核和S5PC110芯片——这款芯片搭载到了三星第一代Galaxy S手机上，全球大卖，成为iPhone最早的挑战者。在意识到Intrinsity的价值之后，苹果抢先三星一步把Intrinsity收入囊中，这导致三星以后再也不能使用Intrinsity的技术了。而2010年也是三星和苹果分道扬镳的开始——三星自诩安卓阵营老大，已经跟iPhone全面开战，而苹果在屏幕、闪存和芯片方面却仍然要依靠三星，只能咬着牙忍气吞声。在两家貌合神离、合作暗流涌动的背景下，苹果第一代自研芯片A4在2010年1月发布了，这便有了本文开头的场景。苹果自家的团队在A4上的贡献其实并不大，A4大部分设计工作由三星和Intrinsity完成，跟三星的S5PC110芯片其实是同卵双胞胎。因此，当一些拆解机构对A4的裸片进行显微拍照和红外成像后，发现苹果号称的自研跟S5PC110内核相同时，嘲讽铺天盖地袭来。A4 和S5PC110对比，ARM内核几乎一致但Johny Srouji和团队几乎没有受到任何影响，而Intrinsity公司100多人团队的加入又让苹果如虎添翼。几只不同背景的队伍汇聚在一起，他们把重点放在了A5之上，并为了能让A5搭上计划在2011年发布的iPhone4S而争分夺秒。而在另一厢，乔布斯让库克派出了手下大将、运营副总裁Jeff Williams秘密前往台湾接洽台积电，张忠谋亲自在家里接待，双方喝着红酒达成协议：苹果未来将把芯片代工的订单转移给台积电，台积电则保证准备90亿美元建厂资金和6000个工人，以确保产能。很快，全世界都将目睹苹果芯片团队神挡杀神、佛挡杀佛的震撼过程。神挡杀神，佛挡杀佛从繁华的以色列特拉维夫驾车向北，穿过咸湿的海风，不出30公里就能抵达沐浴在地中海阳光里的Herzliya市。这里远离加沙和约旦河西岸，你几乎不会在天空上看到“铁穹”拦截哈马斯火箭时划过的白烟。人们享受着白色的沙滩、密集的咖啡馆和葱郁的林荫大道，生活方式不像中东而更像加州，在这座安静的小城里，有超过1000名员工正在为苹果研发芯片。苹果位于Herzliya的研发中心苹果在以色列部署一支庞大的军团，一方面跟Johny Srouji是以色列人有关，一方面也是因为以色列本身就是半导体人才的富矿。苹果从2011年开始便通过招募和收购的方式，在这个离硅谷1.2万公里的地方建立起了海外第二大研发中心，几乎都是芯片相关。人们很难在叙利亚内战和ISIS崛起这些黎凡特地区新闻里找到苹果造芯的蛛丝马迹，而苹果的缄默也让Johny Srouji的团队变得神神秘秘，他本人更是极少接受采访。后来彭博在2016年终于拿到专访机会，标题就很直接[10]：那个你从来都没听说过，但又最重要的苹果高管。其实这种刻意除了增加流言和猜测外，并没有起到“低调”的效果——因为A系列芯片的强悍性能，已经砸到所有人脸上了。2010年的A4贬褒不一，但2011年的A5和2012年的A6这两款双核芯片，就已经在性能上对齐同期安卓机皇的四核芯片。2013年，苹果率先推出全球首款64位处理器A7，将仍处在32位时代的高通、三星远远抛在身后，移动SoC自此进入64位时代。要想看懂苹果芯片，需要先了解一些事实：ARM这家公司其实卖两种东西，一类叫“架构许可”，客户可以根据指令集架构设计自己的内核；一种叫“公版内核”，就是ARM帮你设计好的内核，客户买回家整合到自己芯片里就行。用一个未必恰当的类比：“架构许可”好比卖食材，ARM帮你洗好剥净，你不用搞个菜园自己种了（拉低芯片设计成本），但最后菜好不好吃还得看你煎炸烹煮的水平；而后者则是用上述食材做好的预制菜，回家放点儿葱花简单烹饪一下，很快就能凑出一桌酒席。当然，“预制菜”听起来简单，但全世界能做好的也不多，敢于尝试自己下厨开发私版内核的人更少，比如ARMv8的“架构许可”全球仅有15家客户。苹果的A4和A5上都是买公版内核，等于吃了两年的“预制菜”，而从iPhone5搭载的A6芯片开始，苹果就想自己下厨了。Johny Srouji的团队先是推出了基于ARMv7架构的Swift内核，让A6备受好评；ARM在2011年底又发布了新的ARMv8架构，苹果全力冲刺在12个月之内就搞出了基于新架构的Cyclone（旋风）内核，搭载新内核的A7成为全球首款64位处理器，拉下高通和三星一大截。之后的故事便耳熟能详，从A7到去年发布的A16，苹果A系列芯片基本都对安卓阵营的同级芯片形成碾压。由A系列锤炼出来的芯片设计能力，不出意外地“溢出”到苹果其他的硬件创新上。2014年，苹果发布第一代Apple Watch，搭载地就是苹果自研的S系列芯片；2016年，苹果发布第一代Airpods，搭载的是自研的W系列芯片（后被H系列取代）。Airpods是芯片推动硬件创新的典范。在Airpods出现之前，市面上大多数产品都需要用实线连接两只耳机，而苹果通过W1芯片实现了蓝牙信号监听，消灭了累赘的传输线，并大幅提升了延迟、降噪、续航等方面的体验，基本上重新定义了“无线蓝牙耳机”这个产品。到了2018年，内功突飞猛进的苹果终于做了一个惊天动地的决定：把枪口重新对准Intel。这恐怕是半导体产业诞生以来最难啃的硬骨头。如前文所述，Intel在诞生的半个世纪里纵横捭阖，脚下全是挑战者的尸骨。x86帝国不仅在PC机上接近垄断，在服务器和高性能计算机（HPC）领域也把RISC阵营挤出市场。苹果既然敢去在此挑战Intel，就肯定不会打无准备之仗。事实上，经过多年的闷声大发展，Johny Srouji团队的人数已经超过4000人，战斗力爆表，更重要的是，A系列的很多技术都能跟M系列（苹果桌面级芯片的代号）通用。比如苹果基于ARMv8架构设计了Firestorm（火风暴）和Icestorm（冰风暴）两个名字炫酷的内核，前者性能高，后者能耗小，2020年9月发布的A14芯片就用上了这两款内核（2+4），而2020年11月发布的M1芯片也同样用上了（4+4）。当然，设计桌面级芯片复杂度要比手机芯片大得多，翻车的概率也很大。因此当苹果把换芯的决定告知了Intel，后者大感惊愕之余提示风险，苹果表示“我们不是第一次（换芯片）了”，并频繁地对外抱怨Intel挤牙膏式的产品升级，像极了在演一部电影：分手的决心。不满Intel挤牙膏的不光苹果，很多Wintel阵营的用户也暗自希望Intel能有点儿压力；那些见识过苹果A系列芯片辗压级战斗力的果粉，自然无比期待；对于半导体行业的观察者来说，此事更是意义重大——晋西北好久没打成一锅粥了，你李云龙闹得越大越好。2020年11月，库克发布了搭载M1芯片的Macbook Pro。在展示M1性能的那一刻，所有芯片玩家都屏住了呼吸。M1总共有160亿晶体管，它把8核CPU（4大4小）、8核GPU、图像处理单元 (ISP)、神经网络单元等都集成在一个硅基SoC上，通过统一内存技术大幅提升内部通信带宽，单核和多核的性能可以简单理解为介于Intel的i7和i9之间。M1的强悍性能到了让Intel看了沉默、AMD看了流泪的地步，甚至苹果内部高管也被M1的性能所惊讶。发布会结束之后，苹果软件负责人Craig Federighi和硬件负责人John Ternus接受采访直言[11]：苹果自己都没能预料M1芯片会带来如此大的进步。苹果高管或许还有王婆卖瓜的嫌疑，但Macbook的销量不会骗人：2021年，笔记本销量因为疫情大涨，但Macbook增长最快，市场占有率超过10%，份额扩大了24%；2022年疫情退潮，在全球笔记本销量下滑的背景下，Macbook继续增长，份额已经达到了14%。M1之后，Johny Srouji的团队继续攻城拔寨，陆续推出了M1 Pro、M1 Max、M1 Ultra和M2芯片，逐步其他苹果桌面设备的Intel芯片换掉。Johny Srouji也开始走向前台，频繁现身苹果发布会，甚至一度有传言说他会去接任Intel的CEO。尽管苹果不会对外出售M系芯片跟Intel直接开战，但两家公司纠缠30年的角力，终于画上了句号。不光是Intel，苹果跟几乎所有半导体巨擘发生都过交集：它抛弃了IBM和摩托罗拉，直接导致两者退出了芯片领域；它割席了三星，并扶持了它的对手台积电；它压制了高通，让所有安卓机皇都不敢妄言跟A系列芯片比肩……一部苹果造芯记，半本硅谷崛起史。回头来看，苹果造芯的这场逆袭是如此地漫长，以至于这个故事差不多囊括了大部分硅谷的风云人物和事件——从集成电路的起源到个人计算机的革命、从Wintel联盟的制霸到RISC阵营的反击、从ARM的诞生到台积电的崛起……一场奥德修斯式的返乡故事，能够带给我们什么启示呢？启示录如果单纯只问苹果造芯的故事有什么参考意义，那么答案也很简单：几乎没有任何参考意义。苹果是一家跟硅谷同频起飞的公司，它的历史本身就是硅谷的一部分。土生土长的硅谷本地人乔布斯跟很多教科书里的芯片大神私交甚笃，比如仙童和Intel的创始人罗伯特·诺伊斯甚至对妻子这样开玩笑：如果乔布斯再这么晚给我打电话，我会杀了他。前文所述造芯的“一个前提和三个条件”，除了“前提”外，单拎出来资金（利润率和资金储备）、团队（人才密度和号召力）和客户（市占率和用户粘性），再加上创始人的特质，你就会发现苹果的成功不但中国公司复制不了，美国也没有第二个公司能复制。如果说这部爽文能有什么启发的话，那笔者提一个没那么宏大澎湃的角度：计算机和芯片是“产业”，但更是“科学”。苹果造芯这个故事的“明线”，是一家消费电子公司如何隐忍如何爆发最后了解恩怨；而“暗线”则是CISC和RISC两种不同的芯片设计理念三十年的相互缠斗——这种缠斗本质上是计算机体系结构（Computer Architecture）这门“科学”的发展在“产业”上的延伸。什么能表征产业？产值、利税、市占率、就业人口。什么能表征科学？理论、定律、思想、底层突破。计算机和芯片当然是产业，但更是两门诞生不到100年、还在演化和突破的科学，而苹果故事里的要素提醒了我们一个事实：美国是这两门科学发源的地方。组成计算机和芯片这两门科学的大厦的，是晶体管、集成电路、Unix、编译器、以太网、GUI（用户图形界面）、RISC、数据库、TCP/IP、面向对象编程、激光打印、人工智能、浮点计算、神经网络、机器学习……它们几乎都出现在美国。产业容易转移，但科学却不容易转移，或者说科学无法转移，只能通过悉心培育科学精神，才能在自己的土地上开花结果。美国虽然很多产业被转移出去，但仍然把控着计算机和芯片科学的创新，而至今70多位ACM图灵奖的获得者，也几乎全部都是美国人。理解这个，就容易解答很多人的疑问：为何我产业规模如此大了，还这么容易被卡脖子？当然，考虑到起点，能先把产业做起来已属不易。毕竟当苹果成立的时候，四人帮还在台上。1984年洛杉矶奥运会，西方的记者都用上了IBM的PC机，中国记者却只有纸和笔，法新社写道：“在全世界报道奥运会的7000名记者中，只有中国人用手写他们的报道。”在经济突飞猛进的四十多年里，无论是大型企业的掌门人，还是十八线城市的科长，都习惯了用“产业”的思维来考虑问题。就像2014年杨元庆对话马斯克，前者问后者：2013年联想一共售出了1.15亿台设备，特斯拉卖了几辆车？产值、规模、市占率这些参数，的确有很重要的意义，但不应该被它们遮蔽掉最应该去关注的问题。在过去，太多企业热衷搞规模，热衷堆人头，热衷价格战，在取得一定成绩之后，却又不敢沿着链条向上攀登，反而仍沉浸在低质量的零和博弈里。产业思维重要吗？当然重要，对发展中国家来说意义再怎么强调也不为过。但对于一个正在向上攀援的“吃劲”国家，科学的思维绝对不能缺失。而最近这些年，往往有一个普遍现象：硬骨头很少有人啃，看起来容易的情却一堆人来卷。站稳脚跟的中国科技公司，全社会都应该鼓励他们把精力投入到前沿科学的突破中去，而不是催促他们去植树和捐款。而它们自己，也不应该被那些规模指标所迷惑——富可敌国如苹果，都在花三十年磨一剑，更何况利润率往往只有个位数的诸位呢？中国这些年出现了越来越多靠“科技”来赚钱的公司，在全球产业链上建立了话语权，但在卡脖子的当下，人们不免发出这样的感叹：要是像xxx这样的企业再多一些就好了。穿透一些令人沸腾的数据，我们往往发现很多产业的差距仍然巨大。知己知彼，重要的知己。套用范志毅在国足输给泰国后讲的一句话：“务实一点，把这个足球的理念先搞懂。”对于中国的很多产业来说，要搞懂的东西的确太多太多了，所有的产业参与者，都需要耐心、耐心、再耐心。","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"AAPL":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1025,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9955559762,"gmtCreate":1675597635356,"gmtModify":1676539008746,"author":{"id":"3576892531232178","authorId":"3576892531232178","name":"uiv","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/522ae5f11b7bc763293c30c3a20671c9","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576892531232178","authorIdStr":"3576892531232178"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👌🏻","listText":"👌🏻","text":"👌🏻","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9955559762","repostId":"1173392322","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1173392322","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1675579985,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1173392322?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2023-02-05 14:53","market":"us","language":"zh","title":"US Stocks Speculate AI!","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1173392322","media":"华尔街见闻","summary":"随着ChatGPT火爆出圈，美股市场掀起AI炒作盛宴，“美版头条”BuzzFeed两天暴涨300%，C3.ai 股价翻了一番多。每当一个概念变得炙手可热，资本市场总是会剧烈波动，掀起疯狂的炒作盛宴。随","content":"<p><html><head></head><body><b>With the popularity of ChatGPT, the US stock market set off a feast of AI hype. BuzzFeed, the \"headline of the US version\", soared by 300% in two days, and the share price of C3.ai more than doubled.</b>Whenever a concept becomes hot, the capital market will always fluctuate violently, setting off a crazy feast of hype.</p><p>With OpenAI's Chat<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/300024\">Robot</a>ChatGPT exploded, and investors in U.S. stocks quickly began to speculate fanatically.<b>Enterprises with layout in this track have been enthusiastic without exception.<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BIDU\">Baidu</a>U.S. stocks once soared by more than 10%, BuzzFeed, the \"American version of headlines\", soared by 300% in two days, and C3.ai's share price more than doubled......</b></p><p>The craze can't help but recall the cannabis craze and crypto craze of the late 1990s, and even the dot-com bubble. Investors flocked to the stock market and then asked questions. So here comes the classic debate, is this wave of ChatGPT hype craze a speculative bubble or a pursuit of long-term value?</p><p>In fact, AI is nothing new, and AI stocks have been in the public market for a few years. At present, AI technology has been applied in various fields, such as interactive chatbots, autonomous driving, robotics, warehousing, and even online writing. There is no doubt that artificial<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/5RE.SI\">smart</a>Will continue to evolve and it will bring some fundamental changes in the long run.</p><p><b>But for now, is the underlying stock value really what the current share price reflects? Some analysts believe that this technology is immature, its landing application is still unstable, and the investment is still highly speculative.</b></p><p>A speculative bubble?</p><p>Thanks to the popularity of AI, U.S. stock-related concept stocks rose sharply.</p><p>For example, BuzzFeed, a digital media company known as the American version of headlines, has not been ideal in the past year, and its share price has plummeted. However, nearly a week ago, it was reported that the company plans to use the artificial intelligence program ChatGPT to assist in content creation,<b>With the continuous surge, the stock price once soared by 300% in two days.</b></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d18c859e207a5c0fcdc1002deb07fe95\" tg-width=\"840\" tg-height=\"470\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/>Similarly, artificial intelligence software provider C3.ai Inc is also getting a lot of attention, with C3.ai's shares falling sharply since it went public more than two years ago. However, since C3.ai announced the integration of ChatGPT into its products at the end of January,<b>The stock has surged, more than doubling since Jan. 5.</b></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/108672a65d8b7c7e64da401cef5f5d3b\" tg-width=\"840\" tg-height=\"470\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>As a \"shovel seller\" in the AI industry, providing key chip support<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NVDA\">NVIDIA</a>In the past January, it rose by 33%, which was also the highest increase in the past six years.</p><p>However, signs of a speculative bubble also appear to be showing, with BuzzFeed shares wiping 40% of their price from last week's intraday high. It is worth mentioning that in the wave of blockchain, a U.S. -listed company named Long Island Iced Tea changed its name to \"Long Blockchain\" at that time. Although it once soared by 500%, it didn't escape the fate of delisting.</p><p><b>Cowen analyst John Blackledge noted BuzzFeed's uncertainty about monetizing short video content and its vulnerability to reduced digital ad spending amid a weak consumer spending environment.</b></p><p><b>Regarding the company's recent move to introduce AI technology, John said that while AI could ultimately help BZFD generate more content at a lower cost, it's unclear what the impact of AI adoption will be.</b></p><p>Pursuing long-term value?</p><p>The launch of OpenAI's chatbot ChatGPT has made the market see the huge potential of AI applications.</p><p>At present, the commercialization of AI is accelerating. Soochow analysts pointed out that in March 2021, GPT-3, also owned by OpenAI, had 300+ application customers nine months after its launch, covering intelligent customer service, education and scientific research, games, search engines, etc.</p><p>ChatGPT based on GPT-3.5 has better performance and higher attention, which can further help enterprises and individuals save time and resources, and the application space behind it is expected to be broader.</p><p><b>according to<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/UBS\">UBS</a>It is estimated that the monthly active users of ChatGPT have exceeded 100 million in January this year, and UBS said that the market size of the whole generative AI application may be as high as 1 trillion USD, and the potential development space is attracting investors.</b></p><p><b>In addition, giants have also added weight in this field.</b>Meta CEO Zuckerberg recently said that one of its main goals is to become a leader in generative AI. Alphabet CEO Pichai said on an earnings call this week that the AI journey has just begun, and the best is yet to come. For his part, Snap CEO Evan Spiegel sees generative AI as a \"huge opportunity\" and has already invested heavily in it.</p><p></body></html></p>","source":"wallstreetcn_api","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>US Stocks Speculate AI!</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nUS Stocks Speculate AI!\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">华尔街见闻</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2023-02-05 14:53</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><html><head></head><body><b>With the popularity of ChatGPT, the US stock market set off a feast of AI hype. BuzzFeed, the \"headline of the US version\", soared by 300% in two days, and the share price of C3.ai more than doubled.</b>Whenever a concept becomes hot, the capital market will always fluctuate violently, setting off a crazy feast of hype.</p><p>With OpenAI's Chat<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/300024\">Robot</a>ChatGPT exploded, and investors in U.S. stocks quickly began to speculate fanatically.<b>Enterprises with layout in this track have been enthusiastic without exception.<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BIDU\">Baidu</a>U.S. stocks once soared by more than 10%, BuzzFeed, the \"American version of headlines\", soared by 300% in two days, and C3.ai's share price more than doubled......</b></p><p>The craze can't help but recall the cannabis craze and crypto craze of the late 1990s, and even the dot-com bubble. Investors flocked to the stock market and then asked questions. So here comes the classic debate, is this wave of ChatGPT hype craze a speculative bubble or a pursuit of long-term value?</p><p>In fact, AI is nothing new, and AI stocks have been in the public market for a few years. At present, AI technology has been applied in various fields, such as interactive chatbots, autonomous driving, robotics, warehousing, and even online writing. There is no doubt that artificial<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/5RE.SI\">smart</a>Will continue to evolve and it will bring some fundamental changes in the long run.</p><p><b>But for now, is the underlying stock value really what the current share price reflects? Some analysts believe that this technology is immature, its landing application is still unstable, and the investment is still highly speculative.</b></p><p>A speculative bubble?</p><p>Thanks to the popularity of AI, U.S. stock-related concept stocks rose sharply.</p><p>For example, BuzzFeed, a digital media company known as the American version of headlines, has not been ideal in the past year, and its share price has plummeted. However, nearly a week ago, it was reported that the company plans to use the artificial intelligence program ChatGPT to assist in content creation,<b>With the continuous surge, the stock price once soared by 300% in two days.</b></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d18c859e207a5c0fcdc1002deb07fe95\" tg-width=\"840\" tg-height=\"470\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/>Similarly, artificial intelligence software provider C3.ai Inc is also getting a lot of attention, with C3.ai's shares falling sharply since it went public more than two years ago. However, since C3.ai announced the integration of ChatGPT into its products at the end of January,<b>The stock has surged, more than doubling since Jan. 5.</b></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/108672a65d8b7c7e64da401cef5f5d3b\" tg-width=\"840\" tg-height=\"470\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>As a \"shovel seller\" in the AI industry, providing key chip support<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NVDA\">NVIDIA</a>In the past January, it rose by 33%, which was also the highest increase in the past six years.</p><p>However, signs of a speculative bubble also appear to be showing, with BuzzFeed shares wiping 40% of their price from last week's intraday high. It is worth mentioning that in the wave of blockchain, a U.S. -listed company named Long Island Iced Tea changed its name to \"Long Blockchain\" at that time. Although it once soared by 500%, it didn't escape the fate of delisting.</p><p><b>Cowen analyst John Blackledge noted BuzzFeed's uncertainty about monetizing short video content and its vulnerability to reduced digital ad spending amid a weak consumer spending environment.</b></p><p><b>Regarding the company's recent move to introduce AI technology, John said that while AI could ultimately help BZFD generate more content at a lower cost, it's unclear what the impact of AI adoption will be.</b></p><p>Pursuing long-term value?</p><p>The launch of OpenAI's chatbot ChatGPT has made the market see the huge potential of AI applications.</p><p>At present, the commercialization of AI is accelerating. Soochow analysts pointed out that in March 2021, GPT-3, also owned by OpenAI, had 300+ application customers nine months after its launch, covering intelligent customer service, education and scientific research, games, search engines, etc.</p><p>ChatGPT based on GPT-3.5 has better performance and higher attention, which can further help enterprises and individuals save time and resources, and the application space behind it is expected to be broader.</p><p><b>according to<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/UBS\">UBS</a>It is estimated that the monthly active users of ChatGPT have exceeded 100 million in January this year, and UBS said that the market size of the whole generative AI application may be as high as 1 trillion USD, and the potential development space is attracting investors.</b></p><p><b>In addition, giants have also added weight in this field.</b>Meta CEO Zuckerberg recently said that one of its main goals is to become a leader in generative AI. Alphabet CEO Pichai said on an earnings call this week that the AI journey has just begun, and the best is yet to come. For his part, Snap CEO Evan Spiegel sees generative AI as a \"huge opportunity\" and has already invested heavily in it.</p><p></body></html></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> source：<a href=\"https://wallstreetcn.com/articles/3681193\">华尔街见闻</a></p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5d8fb95e65f042f352c6313989391357","relate_stocks":{"BK4528":"SaaS概念","BK4551":"寇图资本持仓","BK4543":"AI","BK4023":"应用软件","AI":"C3.ai, Inc.","BZFD":"Buzzfeed"},"source_url":"https://wallstreetcn.com/articles/3681193","is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1173392322","content_text":"随着ChatGPT火爆出圈，美股市场掀起AI炒作盛宴，“美版头条”BuzzFeed两天暴涨300%，C3.ai 股价翻了一番多。每当一个概念变得炙手可热，资本市场总是会剧烈波动，掀起疯狂的炒作盛宴。随着OpenAI旗下聊天机器人ChatGPT爆红，美股投资者迅速开始狂热炒作，在该赛道有所布局的企业无一例外受到了热捧。百度美股一度大涨逾10%，“美版头条”BuzzFeed两天暴涨300%，C3.ai股价翻了一番多......这股热潮不禁让人回想起了20世纪90年代末的大麻热潮和加密热潮，甚至是网络泡沫。投资者们纷纷涌入股市，随后提出问题。那么经典的争论来了，这波ChatGPT炒作热潮是投机泡沫还是追求长期价值？事实上，AI并不是新鲜事，AI股票进入公开市场已有几年了。当前，AI技术已应用于各种领域，交互式聊天机器人，自动驾驶、机器人、仓储，甚至是在线写作。毫无疑问，人工智能将继续发展，从长远来看，它将带来一些根本性的变化。但就目前而言，相关股票价值真的如当前股价所体现的吗？部分分析师认为，这项技术还不成熟，其落地应用仍然不稳定，而且投资仍然具有高度投机性。投机泡沫？得益于AI的火爆，美股相关概念股大幅上涨。例如，有美版头条之称的数字媒体公司BuzzFeed，在过去的一年并不理想，股价大跌。但近一周，有消息称，该公司计划采用人工智能程序 ChatGPT 协助内容创作，股价随着连续大涨，曾在两天内暴涨300%。同样的，人工智能软件提供商C3.AI Inc也备受关注，自两年多前上市以来，C3.ai的股价大幅下跌。然而，自1月底C3.ai宣布将ChatGPT集成到其产品中，该股股价大幅飙升，自1月5日以来翻了一番多。作为AI产业的“卖铲人”，提供关键芯片支持的英伟达在刚刚过去的1月大涨33%，这也是其近6年来涨幅最高的一个月。然而，投机泡沫的迹象似乎也正显现，BuzzFeed的股价已从上周的盘中高点抹去40%。值得一提的，在区块链浪潮中，当时一家名为长岛冰茶的美股上市公司将名称改为“长区块链”，尽管一度暴涨500%也没逃过退市的命运。Cowen分析师John Blackledge指出，BuzzFeed在短视频内容货币化方面存在不确定性，以及在消费者支出环境疲软的情况下，其易受数字广告支出减少的影响。对于该公司最近引入人工智能技术的举措，John表示，虽然人工智能最终可以帮助BZFD以更低的成本生成更多内容，但目前还不清楚采用人工智能的影响。追求长期价值？OpenAI旗下聊天机器人ChatGPT的上线，令市场看到了AI应用的巨大潜力。当下AI商业化落地不断提速，东吴分析师指出，2021年3月，同为OpenAI旗下的GPT-3在上线9个月后已经有了300+ 应用客户，领域涵盖智能客服、教育与科研、游戏、搜索引擎等。而基于GPT-3.5的ChatGPT具备更出色的表现和更高的关注度，能够进一步帮助企业、个人节省时间和资源，其背后的的应用空间有望更为广阔。根据瑞银预计，ChatGPT的月活跃用户已在今年1月份突破1亿，且瑞银称整个生成式人工智能应用程序的市场规模或高达1万亿美元，潜在的发展空间正吸引投资者涌入。此外，巨头也纷纷在该领域加码。Meta CEO扎克伯格最近表示，其主要目标之一是成为生成式人工智能领域的领导者。Alphabet CEO皮查伊在本周的电话财报会议上表示，人工智能之旅才刚刚开始，最好的还在后面。Snap首席执行官埃文·斯皮格则认为，生成式人工智能是一个“巨大的机会”，并已经投入大量资金。","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"AI":0.9,"BZFD":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":902,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9955559483,"gmtCreate":1675597616143,"gmtModify":1676539008746,"author":{"id":"3576892531232178","authorId":"3576892531232178","name":"uiv","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/522ae5f11b7bc763293c30c3a20671c9","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576892531232178","authorIdStr":"3576892531232178"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👌🏻","listText":"👌🏻","text":"👌🏻","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9955559483","repostId":"2309740668","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1084,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9955559597,"gmtCreate":1675597603219,"gmtModify":1676539008738,"author":{"id":"3576892531232178","authorId":"3576892531232178","name":"uiv","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/522ae5f11b7bc763293c30c3a20671c9","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576892531232178","authorIdStr":"3576892531232178"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👌🏻","listText":"👌🏻","text":"👌🏻","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9955559597","repostId":"1121837476","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1081,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9955559229,"gmtCreate":1675597587761,"gmtModify":1676539008738,"author":{"id":"3576892531232178","authorId":"3576892531232178","name":"uiv","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/522ae5f11b7bc763293c30c3a20671c9","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576892531232178","authorIdStr":"3576892531232178"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👌🏻","listText":"👌🏻","text":"👌🏻","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9955559229","repostId":"1180519288","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1180519288","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1675582362,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1180519288?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2023-02-05 15:32","market":"us","language":"zh","title":"The big money is back! From stocks to bonds, \"greed\" can be felt everywhere in the U.S. market","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1180519288","media":"华尔街见闻","summary":"随着市场押注加息周期渐入尾声，美股恐惧与贪婪指数（Fear & Greed Index）上周五升至76点，进入“极端贪婪”水平。随着市场押注美联储加息周期渐入尾声，FOMO（Fear of Missi","content":"<p><html><head></head><body><b>The Fear & Greed Index rose to 76 points on Friday, moving into \"extreme Greed\" levels as markets bet on the end of the rate hike cycle.</b>FOMO (Fear of Missing Out) sentiment is starting to regain its dominance as markets bet on the end of the Fed's rate hike cycle. From the bond market to the stock market, large amounts of money began to flow back.</p><p>For much of 2022, corporate bond investors were in a delicate position: the dilemma of avoiding the Fed's rate hike and negative inflation data while providing additional yields, and the dilemma left many investors on the sidelines.</p><p>But going into 2023, things seem to have changed. Oracle issued bonds last week to refinance a bridge loan to acquire electronic medical records company Cerner. The company initially planned to raise $4 billion, but eventually $40 billion poured into the market to participate in the offering. The warm market atmosphere enabled Oracle not only to successfully complete the issuance, but also to pay a lower new issue concession.</p><p>Typically, when a company issues new debt, the bond issuer will give primary investors additional preferential basis points on the basis of the market expected yield, thus generating a new debt premium relative to the secondary market. In 2022, the average concession basis point given by new U.S. bond issuance was +13bp, while Oracle paid only-11bp this time.<b>This means that investors effectively give up some of the gains that would otherwise belong to them in order to get Oracle's bonds.</b></p><p>Oracle's situation is not isolated. In the past week, the U.S. corporate bond market issued more than $18 billion of new bonds, and the subscription scale of investors reached five times the issuance volume, with an average preferential margin of only-1BP. All of this shows that,<b>With the likely peak of the US Treasury yields, fixed-income fund managers began to re-enter the market to snap up bonds.</b></p><p>Corporate bonds aren't the only market for big money to return. In the mortgage debt (CLO) market, Japan's Norinchukin Bank is planning to resume buying. Once one of the biggest buyers of CLOs worldwide, Norinchukin briefly suspended CLO purchases last year due to market chaos caused by UK pensions. Against the backdrop of improved demand, U.S. CLO issuance has topped $10.5 billion this year, up from the level of $7.5 billion in the same period last year.</p><p>The situation is similar in the stock market.<b>U.S. stocks have recently rebounded strongly as the market bets that the rate hike cycle is coming to an end. CNN's Fear & Greed Index, the Fear & Greed Index, rose to 76 on Friday, moving into \"extreme Greed\" levels,</b>In contrast, the index remained at the \"fear\" level of 38 points in January.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3126d061ff13b9fc5df3ab787f14a44f\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"469\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>The strong U.S. stock rally also caught many hedge funds off guard, forcing them to exit bearish bets at the fastest pace in years. Goldman Sachs Prime calculated that the day of hedge fund short covering on February 3 was the largest since November 2015 and even outpaced the retail frenzy of January 2021.</p><p>Although the market is bullish, some institutional investors remain cautious.</p><p>Michael Hartnett, a strategist at Bank of America and the analyst who predicted the trend of U.S. stocks most accurately in 2022, believes that the rally of U.S. stocks has gone too far, and the S&P 500 will hit a high point in mid-February. If the U.S. economic growth is weak in the second half of the year, investors will experience a tragic decline. It suggests that investors may consider leaving the market after 4200 points.</p><p>Paul Singer, the founder of Elliott and a famous hedge fund manager, shared a similar view. It warned in a private meeting,<b>The aggressive monetary and fiscal policies of the Federal Reserve for more than 10 years cannot be resolved in 1 year</b>At present, many valuation indicators are still higher than those during the Internet bubble in 2000, and the bear market of U.S. stocks has not yet ended.</p><p></body></html></p>","source":"wallstreetcn_api","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>The big money is back! From stocks to bonds, \"greed\" can be felt everywhere in the U.S. market</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nThe big money is back! From stocks to bonds, \"greed\" can be felt everywhere in the U.S. market\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">华尔街见闻</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2023-02-05 15:32</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><html><head></head><body><b>The Fear & Greed Index rose to 76 points on Friday, moving into \"extreme Greed\" levels as markets bet on the end of the rate hike cycle.</b>FOMO (Fear of Missing Out) sentiment is starting to regain its dominance as markets bet on the end of the Fed's rate hike cycle. From the bond market to the stock market, large amounts of money began to flow back.</p><p>For much of 2022, corporate bond investors were in a delicate position: the dilemma of avoiding the Fed's rate hike and negative inflation data while providing additional yields, and the dilemma left many investors on the sidelines.</p><p>But going into 2023, things seem to have changed. Oracle issued bonds last week to refinance a bridge loan to acquire electronic medical records company Cerner. The company initially planned to raise $4 billion, but eventually $40 billion poured into the market to participate in the offering. The warm market atmosphere enabled Oracle not only to successfully complete the issuance, but also to pay a lower new issue concession.</p><p>Typically, when a company issues new debt, the bond issuer will give primary investors additional preferential basis points on the basis of the market expected yield, thus generating a new debt premium relative to the secondary market. In 2022, the average concession basis point given by new U.S. bond issuance was +13bp, while Oracle paid only-11bp this time.<b>This means that investors effectively give up some of the gains that would otherwise belong to them in order to get Oracle's bonds.</b></p><p>Oracle's situation is not isolated. In the past week, the U.S. corporate bond market issued more than $18 billion of new bonds, and the subscription scale of investors reached five times the issuance volume, with an average preferential margin of only-1BP. All of this shows that,<b>With the likely peak of the US Treasury yields, fixed-income fund managers began to re-enter the market to snap up bonds.</b></p><p>Corporate bonds aren't the only market for big money to return. In the mortgage debt (CLO) market, Japan's Norinchukin Bank is planning to resume buying. Once one of the biggest buyers of CLOs worldwide, Norinchukin briefly suspended CLO purchases last year due to market chaos caused by UK pensions. Against the backdrop of improved demand, U.S. CLO issuance has topped $10.5 billion this year, up from the level of $7.5 billion in the same period last year.</p><p>The situation is similar in the stock market.<b>U.S. stocks have recently rebounded strongly as the market bets that the rate hike cycle is coming to an end. CNN's Fear & Greed Index, the Fear & Greed Index, rose to 76 on Friday, moving into \"extreme Greed\" levels,</b>In contrast, the index remained at the \"fear\" level of 38 points in January.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3126d061ff13b9fc5df3ab787f14a44f\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"469\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>The strong U.S. stock rally also caught many hedge funds off guard, forcing them to exit bearish bets at the fastest pace in years. Goldman Sachs Prime calculated that the day of hedge fund short covering on February 3 was the largest since November 2015 and even outpaced the retail frenzy of January 2021.</p><p>Although the market is bullish, some institutional investors remain cautious.</p><p>Michael Hartnett, a strategist at Bank of America and the analyst who predicted the trend of U.S. stocks most accurately in 2022, believes that the rally of U.S. stocks has gone too far, and the S&P 500 will hit a high point in mid-February. If the U.S. economic growth is weak in the second half of the year, investors will experience a tragic decline. It suggests that investors may consider leaving the market after 4200 points.</p><p>Paul Singer, the founder of Elliott and a famous hedge fund manager, shared a similar view. It warned in a private meeting,<b>The aggressive monetary and fiscal policies of the Federal Reserve for more than 10 years cannot be resolved in 1 year</b>At present, many valuation indicators are still higher than those during the Internet bubble in 2000, and the bear market of U.S. stocks has not yet ended.</p><p></body></html></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> source：<a href=\"https://wallstreetcn.com/articles/3681195\">华尔街见闻</a></p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/627bc890436e46f74a0fe8143398a725","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://wallstreetcn.com/articles/3681195","is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1180519288","content_text":"随着市场押注加息周期渐入尾声，美股恐惧与贪婪指数（Fear & Greed Index）上周五升至76点，进入“极端贪婪”水平。随着市场押注美联储加息周期渐入尾声，FOMO（Fear of Missing Out，错失恐惧）情绪开始重新主导市场。从债市到股市，大额资金开始重新回流。在2022年的大部分时间里，公司债投资者处境微妙：既要躲避美联储加息和负面通胀数据，又要提供额外的收益，两难的境遇使得不少投资者持币观望。但进入2023年，情况似乎有所变化。甲骨文公司上周发行债券，为收购电子医疗记录公司Cerner的过桥贷款进行再融资。公司最初计划筹集40亿美元，但最终有400亿美元涌入市场参与发行。热烈的市场氛围使得甲骨文不仅顺利完成发行，公司最终支付的新债溢价（new issue concession）也较低。通常情况下，当公司进行新债发行时，债券发行者会在市场期望收益率基础上给一级投资者额外的优惠基点，从而产生相对于二级市场的新债溢价。在2022年，美国新债发行给予的平均优惠基点为+13bp，而甲骨文这次付出仅为-11bp，这意味着投资者实际上放弃了原本属于他们的部分收益，以获得甲骨文的债券。甲骨文的情况并不孤立。在过去一周，美国公司债市场发行了超180亿美元的新债，投资者认购规模达到发行量的5倍，平均优惠幅度也仅为-1bp。所有这些都表明，伴随着美债利率可能见顶，固收基金经理开始重新入场抢购债券。公司债券并不是大资金回归的唯一市场。在抵押贷款债务（CLO）市场，日本的Norinchukin银行正计划恢复购买。作为全球CLO曾经的最大买家之一，受英国养老金引发的市场混乱影响，Norinchukin去年一度暂停了CLO购买。需求改善背景下，美国CLO发行量今年已突破105亿美元，高于去年同期75亿美元的水平。股票市场的情况也是类似。随着市场押注加息周期渐入尾声，美股近期强劲反弹。CNN的恐惧与贪婪指数“Fear & Greed Index”上周五升至76点，进入“极端贪婪”水平，与之相对，此前1月该指数还维持在“恐惧”水平的38点。强劲的美股反弹也令许多对冲基金措手不及，被迫以多年来最快的速度退出看跌押注。据高盛Prime部门计算，2月3日当日的对冲基金空头回补是自2015年11月以来规模最大的一次，甚至超过了2021年1月的散户狂潮。虽然市场看涨情绪热烈，但部分机构投资者依然保持谨慎。2022年对美股走势预判最精准的分析师、美国银行策略分析师Michael Hartnett认为，美股涨势已经过头，标普500将在2月中旬触及高点，如果下半年美国经济增长乏力，投资者将会经历惨烈的下跌。其建议投资者可考虑于4200点后止赚离场。Elliott创办人、著名对冲基金经理Paul Singer也持类似观点。其在非公开会议中警告，美联储实行超过10年的激进货币和财政政策不可能在1年内化解，目前不少估值指标，仍高于2000年互联网泡沫时期，美股熊市尚未束。","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".DJI":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":744,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9955559676,"gmtCreate":1675597570996,"gmtModify":1676539008737,"author":{"id":"3576892531232178","authorId":"3576892531232178","name":"uiv","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/522ae5f11b7bc763293c30c3a20671c9","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3576892531232178","authorIdStr":"3576892531232178"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"👌🏻","listText":"👌🏻","text":"👌🏻","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9955559676","repostId":"1146197170","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1146197170","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1675592060,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1146197170?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2023-02-05 18:14","market":"us","language":"zh","title":"Real Hammer Short Report Key Charges! US media added the \"last straw\" to India's richest man, and the Indian government had to come forward","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1146197170","media":"华尔街见闻","summary":"Adani Power在其最新的季度报告中将毛里求斯公司Opal描述为独立股东，而“巧合”的是，Adani的哥哥Vinod Adani与Opal董事Ricardo Caillou同时被列为另一家公司的","content":"<p><html><head></head><body><b>Adani Power described Mauritius company Opal as an independent shareholder in its latest quarterly report, and \"coincidentally\" Adani's brother Vinod Adani was listed on the board of another company at the same time as Opal director Ricardo Caillou.</b>Since Hindenburg released the short selling report on Adani Group, the net worth of Indian billionaire Adani has been \"halved\", and the share price of his company has plummeted. Now there is evidence that almost hammers the key allegations of the short selling report!</p><p>On Saturday, a media investigation found links between Adani independent shareholder Opal and the Adani family, all but corroborating allegations that Adani used offshore companies to violate high holdings.</p><p>The continued fermentation of the Adani scandal not only brought a disastrous impact on Adani Group, but also increased the volatility of the entire Indian stock market, and the Indian government had to step forward to appease the market.</p><p>Charges Real Hammer: Using Offshore Companies to Violate Highly Holding</p><p>It is reported that,<b>Opal Investment is one of the majority shareholders of Adani poewr, an energy company in Adani's business empire, and Adani Power describes Opal in its latest quarterly report as an independent shareholder, i.e. not affiliated with the Adani Group except for its 4.69% stake in Adani Power.</b></p><p>However, when the media reviewed the company documents, it was discovered that Opal was incorporated in Mauritius by Trustlink International Ltd., a financial services company linked to the Adani family, and that Louis Ricardo Caillou, one of Trustlink's directors, was not only a board member of Opal, but also a board member of another Mauritian company, Krunal Trade & Investment Pvt. Ltd.<b>By \"coincidence\", Adani's brother Vinod Adani and Subir Mittra, CEO of the Adani Family Money Office, were also listed on the company's board.</b></p><p>Under the rules set by the Securities and Exchange Commission of India, companies with less than 25% of their shares in the free float are at risk of being delisted. In the third quarter of the fiscal year ended March 31, Adani family members and companies publicly disclosing ties to Adani held 74.97% of Adani poewr shares, company filings show. While Opal's stake in Adani Power represents nearly 19% of the independent shareholders' stake in Adani Power.</p><p><b>The finding all but hammers down Hindenburg's key allegations, confirming that Adani used offshore companies to violate high holdings.</b>On January 24, Hindenburg released a 104-page report last week alleging widespread fraud by the Adani Group, including using shell companies to inflate share prices and ignoring India's shareholding rules.</p><p>Adani scandal continues to ferment Indian government steps in to appease the market</p><p>Adani has \"bled out\" hundreds of billions of dollars due to fraud allegations, and according to FactSet, the market value of seven publicly traded companies in the Adani Group has lost a combined $108 billion since Tuesday. Adani Group bond prices have mostly fallen to junk bond levels.</p><p><b>The Indian government has had to step in to reassure investors as the Adani asset sell-off intensifies, exacerbating the volatility of the Indian stock market and even bringing negative impacts to India as a whole.</b></p><p>The Securities and Exchange Commission of India (SEBI), noting that conglomerate stocks have experienced unusual volatility over the past week, has put in place a clear, publicly available set of monitoring measures to address excessive volatility in specific stocks.</p><p>The Indian finance minister also personally stepped down, releasing a statement on Saturday to reassure the market, saying that the regulators will do their due diligence and that the problems of Adani Group will not affect India's macroeconomy. Furthermore, the opposition parties have requested an investigation into the relationship between Adani and Prime Minister Narendra Modi.</p><p>The announcement comes a day after the National Stock Exchange of India decided to tighten trading controls on Adani Enterprises, Adani Ports and Ambuja Cements by raising margin requirements to curb short selling. Analysts said the selloff at the group's companies had weighed on India's otherwise strong Sensex index.</p><p>However, the crisis may be far from over. The continuous selling of stocks and bonds, combined with high bond interest rates and severely deteriorating financing channels, may plunge Adani Group into a \"death cycle\". Secondly, due to the huge size of Adani Group and its intricate relationship with Indian politics, the negative impact of Adani scandal on India as a whole will continue to ferment.</p><p></body></html></p>","source":"wallstreetcn_api","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Real Hammer Short Report Key Charges! US media added the \"last straw\" to India's richest man, and the Indian government had to come forward</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nReal Hammer Short Report Key Charges! US media added the \"last straw\" to India's richest man, and the Indian government had to come forward\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">华尔街见闻</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2023-02-05 18:14</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><html><head></head><body><b>Adani Power described Mauritius company Opal as an independent shareholder in its latest quarterly report, and \"coincidentally\" Adani's brother Vinod Adani was listed on the board of another company at the same time as Opal director Ricardo Caillou.</b>Since Hindenburg released the short selling report on Adani Group, the net worth of Indian billionaire Adani has been \"halved\", and the share price of his company has plummeted. Now there is evidence that almost hammers the key allegations of the short selling report!</p><p>On Saturday, a media investigation found links between Adani independent shareholder Opal and the Adani family, all but corroborating allegations that Adani used offshore companies to violate high holdings.</p><p>The continued fermentation of the Adani scandal not only brought a disastrous impact on Adani Group, but also increased the volatility of the entire Indian stock market, and the Indian government had to step forward to appease the market.</p><p>Charges Real Hammer: Using Offshore Companies to Violate Highly Holding</p><p>It is reported that,<b>Opal Investment is one of the majority shareholders of Adani poewr, an energy company in Adani's business empire, and Adani Power describes Opal in its latest quarterly report as an independent shareholder, i.e. not affiliated with the Adani Group except for its 4.69% stake in Adani Power.</b></p><p>However, when the media reviewed the company documents, it was discovered that Opal was incorporated in Mauritius by Trustlink International Ltd., a financial services company linked to the Adani family, and that Louis Ricardo Caillou, one of Trustlink's directors, was not only a board member of Opal, but also a board member of another Mauritian company, Krunal Trade & Investment Pvt. Ltd.<b>By \"coincidence\", Adani's brother Vinod Adani and Subir Mittra, CEO of the Adani Family Money Office, were also listed on the company's board.</b></p><p>Under the rules set by the Securities and Exchange Commission of India, companies with less than 25% of their shares in the free float are at risk of being delisted. In the third quarter of the fiscal year ended March 31, Adani family members and companies publicly disclosing ties to Adani held 74.97% of Adani poewr shares, company filings show. While Opal's stake in Adani Power represents nearly 19% of the independent shareholders' stake in Adani Power.</p><p><b>The finding all but hammers down Hindenburg's key allegations, confirming that Adani used offshore companies to violate high holdings.</b>On January 24, Hindenburg released a 104-page report last week alleging widespread fraud by the Adani Group, including using shell companies to inflate share prices and ignoring India's shareholding rules.</p><p>Adani scandal continues to ferment Indian government steps in to appease the market</p><p>Adani has \"bled out\" hundreds of billions of dollars due to fraud allegations, and according to FactSet, the market value of seven publicly traded companies in the Adani Group has lost a combined $108 billion since Tuesday. Adani Group bond prices have mostly fallen to junk bond levels.</p><p><b>The Indian government has had to step in to reassure investors as the Adani asset sell-off intensifies, exacerbating the volatility of the Indian stock market and even bringing negative impacts to India as a whole.</b></p><p>The Securities and Exchange Commission of India (SEBI), noting that conglomerate stocks have experienced unusual volatility over the past week, has put in place a clear, publicly available set of monitoring measures to address excessive volatility in specific stocks.</p><p>The Indian finance minister also personally stepped down, releasing a statement on Saturday to reassure the market, saying that the regulators will do their due diligence and that the problems of Adani Group will not affect India's macroeconomy. Furthermore, the opposition parties have requested an investigation into the relationship between Adani and Prime Minister Narendra Modi.</p><p>The announcement comes a day after the National Stock Exchange of India decided to tighten trading controls on Adani Enterprises, Adani Ports and Ambuja Cements by raising margin requirements to curb short selling. Analysts said the selloff at the group's companies had weighed on India's otherwise strong Sensex index.</p><p>However, the crisis may be far from over. The continuous selling of stocks and bonds, combined with high bond interest rates and severely deteriorating financing channels, may plunge Adani Group into a \"death cycle\". Secondly, due to the huge size of Adani Group and its intricate relationship with Indian politics, the negative impact of Adani scandal on India as a whole will continue to ferment.</p><p></body></html></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> source：<a href=\"https://wallstreetcn.com/articles/3681202\">华尔街见闻</a></p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/726be8ee1c947cd00b8202879a078437","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://wallstreetcn.com/articles/3681202","is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1146197170","content_text":"Adani Power在其最新的季度报告中将毛里求斯公司Opal描述为独立股东，而“巧合”的是，Adani的哥哥Vinod Adani与Opal董事Ricardo Caillou同时被列为另一家公司的董事会成员。自兴登堡发布对Adani集团的做空报告以来，印度亿万富翁Adani身家遭“腰斩”，旗下公司股价暴跌，如今有证据几乎实锤做空报告的关键指控！周六，媒体调查发现，Adani独立股东Opal与Adani家族存在联系，几乎证实了Adani利用离岸公司违规高度控股的指控。Adani丑闻持续发酵不仅给Adani集团带来灾难性的影响，也令整个印度股市波动加剧，印度政府不得不出面安抚市场。指控实锤：利用离岸公司违规高度控股据悉，Opal Investment是Adani商业帝国中的能源公司Adani poewr的大股东之一，Adani Power在其最新的季度报告中将Opal描述为独立股东，即除持有Adani power 4.69%的股份外，与Adani集团没有任何关系。然而，媒体在审查公司文件时发现，Opal是由Trustlink International Ltd.在毛里求斯注册成立的，Trustlink是一家与Adani家族有关联的金融服务公司，Trustlink的董事之一Louis Ricardo Caillou，不仅是Opal的董事会成员，同时还是另一家毛里求斯公司Krunal Trade & Investment Pvt.Ltd.的董事会成员。“巧合”的是，Adani的哥哥Vinod Adani和Adani家族理财办公室首席执行官Subir Mittra也被列为该公司董事会成员。根据印度证券交易委员会制定的规则，少于25%自由流通股份的公司有被退市的风险。公司文件显示，在截至3月31日财政年度的第三季度中，Adani家族成员和公开披露与Adani有关的公司持有74.97%的Adani poewr股份。而Opal在Adani Power的股份占Adani Power中独立股东股份的近19%。这一发现几乎实锤了兴登堡的关键指控，证实了Adani利用离岸公司违规高度控股。1月24日，兴登堡上周发布了一份长达104页的报告，指控阿达尼集团存在范围广泛的欺诈行为，包括利用空壳公司抬高股价以及无视印度的持股规则。Adani丑闻持续发酵 印度政府出面安抚市场由于欺诈指控，Adani公司“失血”上千亿美元，根据FactSet的数据，自上周二以来，Adani集团七家上市公司的市值总共减少了1080亿美元。Adani集团债券价格大多已跌至垃圾债水平。随着Adani资产抛售力度加大，加剧了印度股市的波动，甚至给整个印度带来了负面影响，印度政府不得不出面安抚投资者。印度证券交易委员会（SEBI）指出，过去一周，企业集团股票出现异常波动，已经制定了一套明确的、公开可用的监控措施，解决特定股票的过度波动。印度财长也亲自下场，在周六发布声明安抚市场，称监管机构将尽职尽责，Adani集团的问题不会影响印度的宏观经济。此外，反对党已要求调查Adani和总理莫迪之间的关系。在声明发布前一天，印度国家证券交易所决定加强对Adani Enterprises、Adani Ports和Ambuja Cements的交易控制，提高保证金要求，以遏制卖空行为。分析师表示，该集团旗下公司的抛售拖累了印度原本表现强劲的Sensex指数。然而，危机可能还远未结束。股票债券的持续抛售，叠加高昂的债券利息及严重恶化的融资渠道，或使Adani集团陷入“死亡循环”。其次，由于Adani集团庞大的体量及其与印度政坛错综复杂的关系，Adani丑闻给整个印度带来的负面影响也还将持续发酵。","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":816,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":9050886514,"gmtCreate":1654169080338,"gmtModify":1676535405843,"author":{"id":"3576892531232178","authorId":"3576892531232178","name":"uiv","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/522ae5f11b7bc763293c30c3a20671c9","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3576892531232178","idStr":"3576892531232178"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/HYMC\">$Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation(HYMC)$</a>Up","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/HYMC\">$Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation(HYMC)$</a>Up","text":"$Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation(HYMC)$Up","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/d1ad4d1dfbe378096cee99a1ef9de843","width":"828","height":"1632"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":8,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9050886514","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":616,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9081712859,"gmtCreate":1650279552839,"gmtModify":1676534684923,"author":{"id":"3576892531232178","authorId":"3576892531232178","name":"uiv","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/522ae5f11b7bc763293c30c3a20671c9","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3576892531232178","idStr":"3576892531232178"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/CEI\">$Camber Energy(CEI)$</a>up","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/CEI\">$Camber Energy(CEI)$</a>up","text":"$Camber Energy(CEI)$up","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/80de43e3758e0d6e03defb99ecde2b27","width":"828","height":"1632"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9081712859","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":974,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9057652648,"gmtCreate":1655513332184,"gmtModify":1676535653724,"author":{"id":"3576892531232178","authorId":"3576892531232178","name":"uiv","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/522ae5f11b7bc763293c30c3a20671c9","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3576892531232178","idStr":"3576892531232178"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/INDO\">$Indonesia Energy Corp Ltd.(INDO)$</a>😭😭😭😭","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/INDO\">$Indonesia Energy Corp Ltd.(INDO)$</a>😭😭😭😭","text":"$Indonesia Energy Corp Ltd.(INDO)$😭😭😭😭","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/59847610d96efb3e75ef2ce25cde1bd5","width":"828","height":"1632"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9057652648","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1054,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9063383127,"gmtCreate":1651407495298,"gmtModify":1676534902222,"author":{"id":"3576892531232178","authorId":"3576892531232178","name":"uiv","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/522ae5f11b7bc763293c30c3a20671c9","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3576892531232178","idStr":"3576892531232178"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/BTBT\">$Bit Digital, Inc.(BTBT)$</a>😓","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/BTBT\">$Bit Digital, Inc.(BTBT)$</a>😓","text":"$Bit Digital, Inc.(BTBT)$😓","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/b6291f320bfe037dc9c0d0e17ef722f3","width":"828","height":"1632"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9063383127","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":738,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9028988776,"gmtCreate":1653143529496,"gmtModify":1676535230363,"author":{"id":"3576892531232178","authorId":"3576892531232178","name":"uiv","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/522ae5f11b7bc763293c30c3a20671c9","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3576892531232178","idStr":"3576892531232178"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/BTBT\">$Bit Digital, Inc.(BTBT)$</a>😓","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/BTBT\">$Bit Digital, Inc.(BTBT)$</a>😓","text":"$Bit Digital, Inc.(BTBT)$😓","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/0005c3170b9550ff65403e235e11447e","width":"828","height":"1632"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9028988776","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":703,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9061553136,"gmtCreate":1651651118006,"gmtModify":1676534942418,"author":{"id":"3576892531232178","authorId":"3576892531232178","name":"uiv","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/522ae5f11b7bc763293c30c3a20671c9","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3576892531232178","idStr":"3576892531232178"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/HYMC\">$Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation(HYMC)$</a>up","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/HYMC\">$Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation(HYMC)$</a>up","text":"$Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation(HYMC)$up","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/a9ed4d5bc1043fb76dea9c37119997bc","width":"750","height":"1759"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":1,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9061553136","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":451,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9080345749,"gmtCreate":1649852538560,"gmtModify":1676534589861,"author":{"id":"3576892531232178","authorId":"3576892531232178","name":"uiv","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/522ae5f11b7bc763293c30c3a20671c9","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3576892531232178","idStr":"3576892531232178"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/SPCE\">$维珍银河(SPCE)$</a>up","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/SPCE\">$维珍银河(SPCE)$</a>up","text":"$维珍银河(SPCE)$up","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/479eb1c5f7df9fd9bf9cd7a327763352","width":"750","height":"1704"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":1,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9080345749","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2466,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[{"author":{"id":"3575318222868101","authorId":"3575318222868101","name":"vaztan","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/972c075f63310a3140cf0ac0cb71158c","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"3575318222868101","idStr":"3575318222868101"},"content":"This stock will not trend upward till they launch another flight. In the meantime it will be volatile trending .So we relax and go for the ride","text":"This stock will not trend upward till they launch another flight. In the meantime it will be volatile trending .So we relax and go for the ride","html":"This stock will not trend upward till they launch another flight. In the meantime it will be volatile trending .So we relax and go for the ride"}],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9040139921,"gmtCreate":1655617408963,"gmtModify":1676535673004,"author":{"id":"3576892531232178","authorId":"3576892531232178","name":"uiv","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/522ae5f11b7bc763293c30c3a20671c9","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3576892531232178","idStr":"3576892531232178"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/BTBT\">$Bit Digital, Inc.(BTBT)$</a>😭😓","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/BTBT\">$Bit Digital, Inc.(BTBT)$</a>😭😓","text":"$Bit Digital, Inc.(BTBT)$😭😓","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/d1da64299d2156c968171893d8284974","width":"750","height":"2111"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9040139921","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":517,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9055768517,"gmtCreate":1655311715339,"gmtModify":1676535610965,"author":{"id":"3576892531232178","authorId":"3576892531232178","name":"uiv","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/522ae5f11b7bc763293c30c3a20671c9","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3576892531232178","idStr":"3576892531232178"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/INDO\">$Indonesia Energy Corp Ltd.(INDO)$</a>😂😂😂","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/INDO\">$Indonesia Energy Corp Ltd.(INDO)$</a>😂😂😂","text":"$Indonesia Energy Corp Ltd.(INDO)$😂😂😂","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/e1e924782b0c93779751e9e33a2ac97c","width":"828","height":"1632"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9055768517","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":714,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9076533351,"gmtCreate":1657862601173,"gmtModify":1676536074676,"author":{"id":"3576892531232178","authorId":"3576892531232178","name":"uiv","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/522ae5f11b7bc763293c30c3a20671c9","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3576892531232178","idStr":"3576892531232178"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/EBON\">$亿邦国际(EBON)$</a>🙏🏻","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/EBON\">$亿邦国际(EBON)$</a>🙏🏻","text":"$亿邦国际(EBON)$🙏🏻","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/498157174996cd6f3ca9f4964a5acb37","width":"750","height":"2274"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9076533351","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":943,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}