babiboo personal page - To The Moon

babiboo

babiboo

No personal profile

391Follow

25Followers

0Topic

0Badge

2022-11-30

$Tiger Brokers(TIGR)$ whennnnn

2022-11-28

$Invesco QQQ Trust(QQQ)$ hmmm

2022-11-22

$Invesco QQQ Trust(QQQ)$ hmm

2022-11-21

$Invesco QQQ Trust(QQQ)$ noo

2022-11-20

$Invesco QQQ Trust(QQQ)$ wellll

2022-11-19

$Invesco QQQ Trust(QQQ)$ ahhnoo

2022-11-18

$Invesco QQQ Trust(QQQ)$ uppp

2022-11-17

$Invesco QQQ Trust(QQQ)$ huatah

2022-11-16

$Invesco QQQ Trust(QQQ)$ upp

2022-11-15

$Invesco QQQ Trust(QQQ)$ hmm

2022-11-14

$Invesco QQQ Trust(QQQ)$ hmm

2022-11-13

$Tiger Brokers(TIGR)$ nooooooo

2022-11-12

$Invesco QQQ Trust(QQQ)$ uppp

2022-11-11

$Invesco QQQ Trust(QQQ)$ upp

2022-11-10

$Alibaba(BABA)$ ahhhh

2022-11-09

$Invesco QQQ Trust(QQQ)$ ohhh

2022-11-08

$Invesco QQQ Trust(QQQ)$hmm

2022-11-07

$Invesco QQQ Trust(QQQ)$hmm

2022-11-05

$Invesco QQQ Trust(QQQ)$hmm

2022-11-04

$ASCENDAS REAL ESTATE INV TRUST(A17U.SI)$errr

Go to Tiger App to see more news

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"userPageInfo":{"id":"3577409082356068","uuid":"3577409082356068","gmtCreate":1614324208471,"gmtModify":1623725109438,"name":"babiboo","pinyin":"babiboo","introduction":"","introductionEn":null,"signature":"","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8be2f9f25874d7f974661428b042a2e7","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":25,"headSize":391,"tweetSize":666,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":3,"name":"书生虎","nameTw":"書生虎","represent":"努力向上","factor":"发布10条非转发主帖,其中5条获得他人回复或点赞","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":"success","userBadges":[{"badgeId":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493-2","templateUuid":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493","name":"Senior Tiger","description":"Join the tiger community for 1000 days","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0063fb68ea29c9ae6858c58630e182d5","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/96c699a93be4214d4b49aea6a5a5d1a4","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/35b0e542a9ff77046ed69ef602bc105d","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.11.24","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"44212b71d0be4ec88898348dbe882e03-1","templateUuid":"44212b71d0be4ec88898348dbe882e03","name":"Boss Tiger","description":"The transaction amount of the securities account reaches $100,000","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c8dfc27c1ee0e25db1c93e9d0b641101","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f43908c142f8a33c78f5bdf0e2897488","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/82165ff19cb8a786e8919f92acee5213","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.07.14","exceedPercentage":"60.96%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1101},{"badgeId":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be-1","templateUuid":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be","name":"Elite Trader","description":"Total number of securities or futures transactions reached 30","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ab0f87127c854ce3191a752d57b46edc","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c9835ce48b8c8743566d344ac7a7ba8c","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76754b53ce7a90019f132c1d2fbc698f","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2022.08.09","exceedPercentage":"60.66%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100},{"badgeId":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789-1","templateUuid":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789","name":"Knowledgeable Investor","description":"Traded more than 10 stocks","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e74cc24115c4fbae6154ec1b1041bf47","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d48265cbfd97c57f9048db29f22227b0","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76c6d6898b073c77e1c537ebe9ac1c57","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2022.04.06","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1102},{"badgeId":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84-1","templateUuid":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84","name":"Real Trader","description":"Completed a transaction","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":5,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":null,"starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"post","tweets":[{"id":9962568346,"gmtCreate":1669809238585,"gmtModify":1676538247549,"author":{"id":"3577409082356068","authorId":"3577409082356068","name":"babiboo","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8be2f9f25874d7f974661428b042a2e7","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3577409082356068","idStr":"3577409082356068"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/TIGR\">$Tiger Brokers(TIGR)$ &nbsp;</a>whennnnn","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/TIGR\">$Tiger Brokers(TIGR)$ &nbsp;</a>whennnnn","text":"$Tiger Brokers(TIGR)$ whennnnn","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/85708a35ba2629be07bd93279dc8feb7","width":"1080","height":"1920"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9962568346","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":430,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9966476054,"gmtCreate":1669630787579,"gmtModify":1676538215989,"author":{"id":"3577409082356068","authorId":"3577409082356068","name":"babiboo","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8be2f9f25874d7f974661428b042a2e7","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3577409082356068","idStr":"3577409082356068"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/QQQ\">$Invesco QQQ Trust(QQQ)$ &nbsp;</a>hmmm","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/QQQ\">$Invesco QQQ Trust(QQQ)$ &nbsp;</a>hmmm","text":"$Invesco QQQ Trust(QQQ)$ hmmm","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/c4a2ac249cfa4db4b3d46823f74813b7","width":"1080","height":"1920"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9966476054","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":379,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9968945717,"gmtCreate":1669113523739,"gmtModify":1676538153971,"author":{"id":"3577409082356068","authorId":"3577409082356068","name":"babiboo","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8be2f9f25874d7f974661428b042a2e7","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3577409082356068","idStr":"3577409082356068"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/QQQ\">$Invesco QQQ Trust(QQQ)$ &nbsp;</a>hmm","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/QQQ\">$Invesco QQQ Trust(QQQ)$ &nbsp;</a>hmm","text":"$Invesco QQQ Trust(QQQ)$ hmm","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/00aee92d4c602edb97a1c76de74465b7","width":"1080","height":"1920"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9968945717","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":478,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9961450055,"gmtCreate":1669029645577,"gmtModify":1676538141822,"author":{"id":"3577409082356068","authorId":"3577409082356068","name":"babiboo","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8be2f9f25874d7f974661428b042a2e7","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3577409082356068","idStr":"3577409082356068"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/QQQ\">$Invesco QQQ Trust(QQQ)$ &nbsp;</a>noo","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/QQQ\">$Invesco QQQ Trust(QQQ)$ &nbsp;</a>noo","text":"$Invesco QQQ Trust(QQQ)$ noo","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/2d273ed8d054e22f8d46ac05baebe3ac","width":"1080","height":"1920"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9961450055","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":476,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9961603575,"gmtCreate":1668921309997,"gmtModify":1676538128852,"author":{"id":"3577409082356068","authorId":"3577409082356068","name":"babiboo","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8be2f9f25874d7f974661428b042a2e7","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3577409082356068","idStr":"3577409082356068"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/QQQ\">$Invesco QQQ Trust(QQQ)$ &nbsp;</a>wellll","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/QQQ\">$Invesco QQQ Trust(QQQ)$ &nbsp;</a>wellll","text":"$Invesco QQQ Trust(QQQ)$ wellll","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/6c4cb4509604a8a6109fc07deac941ed","width":"1080","height":"1920"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9961603575","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":255,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9961361144,"gmtCreate":1668840743389,"gmtModify":1676538121022,"author":{"id":"3577409082356068","authorId":"3577409082356068","name":"babiboo","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8be2f9f25874d7f974661428b042a2e7","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3577409082356068","idStr":"3577409082356068"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/QQQ\">$Invesco QQQ Trust(QQQ)$ &nbsp;</a>ahhnoo","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/QQQ\">$Invesco QQQ Trust(QQQ)$ &nbsp;</a>ahhnoo","text":"$Invesco QQQ Trust(QQQ)$ ahhnoo","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/6c4cb4509604a8a6109fc07deac941ed","width":"1080","height":"1920"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9961361144","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":485,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9961007930,"gmtCreate":1668778818621,"gmtModify":1676538112501,"author":{"id":"3577409082356068","authorId":"3577409082356068","name":"babiboo","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8be2f9f25874d7f974661428b042a2e7","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3577409082356068","idStr":"3577409082356068"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/QQQ\">$Invesco QQQ Trust(QQQ)$ &nbsp;</a>uppp","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/QQQ\">$Invesco QQQ Trust(QQQ)$ &nbsp;</a>uppp","text":"$Invesco QQQ Trust(QQQ)$ uppp","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/92dd9a4b3a6a15e7639beb247c45c327","width":"1080","height":"1920"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9961007930","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":443,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9963297621,"gmtCreate":1668686272863,"gmtModify":1676538096948,"author":{"id":"3577409082356068","authorId":"3577409082356068","name":"babiboo","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8be2f9f25874d7f974661428b042a2e7","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3577409082356068","idStr":"3577409082356068"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/QQQ\">$Invesco QQQ Trust(QQQ)$ &nbsp;</a>huatah","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/QQQ\">$Invesco QQQ Trust(QQQ)$ &nbsp;</a>huatah","text":"$Invesco QQQ Trust(QQQ)$ huatah","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/42d6d485ad0c31ebc38e31100c1f43dd","width":"1080","height":"1920"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9963297621","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":709,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9963362564,"gmtCreate":1668599079959,"gmtModify":1676538082460,"author":{"id":"3577409082356068","authorId":"3577409082356068","name":"babiboo","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8be2f9f25874d7f974661428b042a2e7","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3577409082356068","idStr":"3577409082356068"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/QQQ\">$Invesco QQQ Trust(QQQ)$ &nbsp;</a>upp","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/QQQ\">$Invesco QQQ Trust(QQQ)$ &nbsp;</a>upp","text":"$Invesco QQQ Trust(QQQ)$ upp","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/730bdf794c4745addf333f563c853145","width":"1080","height":"1920"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9963362564","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":476,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9969591733,"gmtCreate":1668471384423,"gmtModify":1676538060988,"author":{"id":"3577409082356068","authorId":"3577409082356068","name":"babiboo","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8be2f9f25874d7f974661428b042a2e7","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3577409082356068","idStr":"3577409082356068"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/QQQ\">$Invesco QQQ Trust(QQQ)$ &nbsp;</a>hmm","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/QQQ\">$Invesco QQQ Trust(QQQ)$ &nbsp;</a>hmm","text":"$Invesco QQQ Trust(QQQ)$ hmm","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/1429e922bdc5575c956effd2df933fab","width":"1080","height":"1920"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9969591733","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":305,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9969174105,"gmtCreate":1668391492108,"gmtModify":1676538049044,"author":{"id":"3577409082356068","authorId":"3577409082356068","name":"babiboo","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8be2f9f25874d7f974661428b042a2e7","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3577409082356068","idStr":"3577409082356068"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/QQQ\">$Invesco QQQ Trust(QQQ)$ &nbsp;</a>hmm","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/QQQ\">$Invesco QQQ Trust(QQQ)$ &nbsp;</a>hmm","text":"$Invesco QQQ Trust(QQQ)$ hmm","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/d31e72e4ffe9afa0df03944f5acc8f35","width":"1080","height":"1920"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9969174105","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":84,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9969965230,"gmtCreate":1668320836921,"gmtModify":1676538041320,"author":{"id":"3577409082356068","authorId":"3577409082356068","name":"babiboo","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8be2f9f25874d7f974661428b042a2e7","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3577409082356068","idStr":"3577409082356068"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/TIGR\">$Tiger Brokers(TIGR)$ &nbsp;</a>nooooooo","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/TIGR\">$Tiger Brokers(TIGR)$ &nbsp;</a>nooooooo","text":"$Tiger Brokers(TIGR)$ nooooooo","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/eb81890dcb131a8d04c6269bf491ca0d","width":"1080","height":"1920"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9969965230","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":254,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9960426917,"gmtCreate":1668228487639,"gmtModify":1676538031970,"author":{"id":"3577409082356068","authorId":"3577409082356068","name":"babiboo","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8be2f9f25874d7f974661428b042a2e7","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3577409082356068","idStr":"3577409082356068"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/QQQ\">$Invesco QQQ Trust(QQQ)$ &nbsp;</a>uppp","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/QQQ\">$Invesco QQQ Trust(QQQ)$ &nbsp;</a>uppp","text":"$Invesco QQQ Trust(QQQ)$ uppp","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/d31e72e4ffe9afa0df03944f5acc8f35","width":"1080","height":"1920"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9960426917","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":119,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9960236510,"gmtCreate":1668167576130,"gmtModify":1676538023583,"author":{"id":"3577409082356068","authorId":"3577409082356068","name":"babiboo","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8be2f9f25874d7f974661428b042a2e7","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3577409082356068","idStr":"3577409082356068"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/QQQ\">$Invesco QQQ Trust(QQQ)$ &nbsp;</a>upp","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/QQQ\">$Invesco QQQ Trust(QQQ)$ &nbsp;</a>upp","text":"$Invesco QQQ Trust(QQQ)$ upp","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/120fa1b4a2abc22fa02d30ce36ab9907","width":"1080","height":"1920"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9960236510","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":177,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9960352618,"gmtCreate":1668081303234,"gmtModify":1676538009470,"author":{"id":"3577409082356068","authorId":"3577409082356068","name":"babiboo","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8be2f9f25874d7f974661428b042a2e7","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3577409082356068","idStr":"3577409082356068"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/BABA\">$Alibaba(BABA)$ &nbsp;</a>ahhhh","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/BABA\">$Alibaba(BABA)$ &nbsp;</a>ahhhh","text":"$Alibaba(BABA)$ ahhhh","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/1d8c7c82addee5ee18ed4ee5965d8f23","width":"1080","height":"1920"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9960352618","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":93,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9987711944,"gmtCreate":1667991582989,"gmtModify":1676537995594,"author":{"id":"3577409082356068","authorId":"3577409082356068","name":"babiboo","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8be2f9f25874d7f974661428b042a2e7","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3577409082356068","idStr":"3577409082356068"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/QQQ\">$Invesco QQQ Trust(QQQ)$ &nbsp;</a>ohhh","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/QQQ\">$Invesco QQQ Trust(QQQ)$ &nbsp;</a>ohhh","text":"$Invesco QQQ Trust(QQQ)$ ohhh","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/d8d6c48730b3af5a822d7d4c043ec050","width":"1080","height":"1920"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9987711944","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":129,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9987810901,"gmtCreate":1667867437003,"gmtModify":1676537975952,"author":{"id":"3577409082356068","authorId":"3577409082356068","name":"babiboo","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8be2f9f25874d7f974661428b042a2e7","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3577409082356068","idStr":"3577409082356068"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/QQQ\">$Invesco QQQ Trust(QQQ)$</a>hmm","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/QQQ\">$Invesco QQQ Trust(QQQ)$</a>hmm","text":"$Invesco QQQ Trust(QQQ)$hmm","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/266efb20aad7e537bda075f900a6ff9d","width":"1080","height":"1920"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9987810901","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":256,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9987109626,"gmtCreate":1667835095666,"gmtModify":1676537971833,"author":{"id":"3577409082356068","authorId":"3577409082356068","name":"babiboo","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8be2f9f25874d7f974661428b042a2e7","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3577409082356068","idStr":"3577409082356068"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/QQQ\">$Invesco QQQ Trust(QQQ)$</a>hmm","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/QQQ\">$Invesco QQQ Trust(QQQ)$</a>hmm","text":"$Invesco QQQ Trust(QQQ)$hmm","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/1c16ebc5da2a038a582c794ca555a8b8","width":"1080","height":"1920"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9987109626","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":189,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9984262662,"gmtCreate":1667653670556,"gmtModify":1676537948888,"author":{"id":"3577409082356068","authorId":"3577409082356068","name":"babiboo","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8be2f9f25874d7f974661428b042a2e7","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3577409082356068","idStr":"3577409082356068"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/QQQ\">$Invesco QQQ Trust(QQQ)$</a>hmm","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/QQQ\">$Invesco QQQ Trust(QQQ)$</a>hmm","text":"$Invesco QQQ Trust(QQQ)$hmm","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/45e7dbe4fbcbd9db4c834cda7c3f427c","width":"1080","height":"1920"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9984262662","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":118,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9984196883,"gmtCreate":1667555772343,"gmtModify":1676537937129,"author":{"id":"3577409082356068","authorId":"3577409082356068","name":"babiboo","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8be2f9f25874d7f974661428b042a2e7","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3577409082356068","idStr":"3577409082356068"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/A17U.SI\">$ASCENDAS REAL ESTATE INV TRUST(A17U.SI)$</a>errr","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/A17U.SI\">$ASCENDAS REAL ESTATE INV TRUST(A17U.SI)$</a>errr","text":"$ASCENDAS REAL ESTATE INV TRUST(A17U.SI)$errr","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/489317ba61fcb4c2be80acc276e4cae0","width":"1080","height":"1920"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9984196883","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":206,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":9066521633,"gmtCreate":1651929178122,"gmtModify":1676534999108,"author":{"id":"3577409082356068","authorId":"3577409082356068","name":"babiboo","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8be2f9f25874d7f974661428b042a2e7","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577409082356068","authorIdStr":"3577409082356068"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/TIGR\">$Tiger Brokers(TIGR)$</a>cryyyy","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/TIGR\">$Tiger Brokers(TIGR)$</a>cryyyy","text":"$Tiger Brokers(TIGR)$cryyyy","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/088bab10a291d5dc1490592747477fb1","width":"1080","height":"1920"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":8,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":1,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9066521633","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":416,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9900322193,"gmtCreate":1658644204212,"gmtModify":1676536186934,"author":{"id":"3577409082356068","authorId":"3577409082356068","name":"babiboo","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8be2f9f25874d7f974661428b042a2e7","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577409082356068","authorIdStr":"3577409082356068"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/TIGR\">$Tiger Brokers(TIGR)$</a>cryyy","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/TIGR\">$Tiger Brokers(TIGR)$</a>cryyy","text":"$Tiger Brokers(TIGR)$cryyy","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/c47a7075071ca1217084830d6bbea004","width":"1080","height":"1920"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":4,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9900322193","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":201,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":881274935,"gmtCreate":1631353972227,"gmtModify":1676530534695,"author":{"id":"3577409082356068","authorId":"3577409082356068","name":"babiboo","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8be2f9f25874d7f974661428b042a2e7","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577409082356068","authorIdStr":"3577409082356068"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Wow","listText":"Wow","text":"Wow","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":9,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/881274935","repostId":"2166372458","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2166372458","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1631331378,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2166372458?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-09-11 11:36","market":"us","language":"en","title":"U.S. House Democrats propose EV tax credits of up to $12,500","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2166372458","media":"Reuters","summary":"WASHINGTON, Sept 10 (Reuters) - U.S. Democratic lawmakers late Friday proposed boosting tax credits ","content":"<p>WASHINGTON, Sept 10 (Reuters) - U.S. Democratic lawmakers late Friday proposed boosting tax credits for electric vehicles to up to $12,500 per vehicle for union-made zero emission models assembled in the United States.</p>\n<p>Under a broad tax measure that is part of a planned $3.5 trillion spending bill, the House Ways and Means Committee on Tuesday will vote on a measure that lifts the current cap on EV tax credits.</p>\n<p>The bill would make General Motors Co and Tesla Inc&nbsp;eligible again for EV tax credits after they previously hit a cap on the existing $7,500 incentive. It would also create a new smaller credit for used EVs.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>U.S. House Democrats propose EV tax credits of up to $12,500</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nU.S. House Democrats propose EV tax credits of up to $12,500\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-09-11 11:36</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>WASHINGTON, Sept 10 (Reuters) - U.S. Democratic lawmakers late Friday proposed boosting tax credits for electric vehicles to up to $12,500 per vehicle for union-made zero emission models assembled in the United States.</p>\n<p>Under a broad tax measure that is part of a planned $3.5 trillion spending bill, the House Ways and Means Committee on Tuesday will vote on a measure that lifts the current cap on EV tax credits.</p>\n<p>The bill would make General Motors Co and Tesla Inc&nbsp;eligible again for EV tax credits after they previously hit a cap on the existing $7,500 incentive. It would also create a new smaller credit for used EVs.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"GM":"通用汽车","TSLA":"特斯拉"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2166372458","content_text":"WASHINGTON, Sept 10 (Reuters) - U.S. Democratic lawmakers late Friday proposed boosting tax credits for electric vehicles to up to $12,500 per vehicle for union-made zero emission models assembled in the United States.\nUnder a broad tax measure that is part of a planned $3.5 trillion spending bill, the House Ways and Means Committee on Tuesday will vote on a measure that lifts the current cap on EV tax credits.\nThe bill would make General Motors Co and Tesla Inc eligible again for EV tax credits after they previously hit a cap on the existing $7,500 incentive. It would also create a new smaller credit for used EVs.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":50,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":897274277,"gmtCreate":1628932857099,"gmtModify":1676529896314,"author":{"id":"3577409082356068","authorId":"3577409082356068","name":"babiboo","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8be2f9f25874d7f974661428b042a2e7","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577409082356068","authorIdStr":"3577409082356068"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Wah seh","listText":"Wah seh","text":"Wah seh","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":9,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/897274277","repostId":"2159521376","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2159521376","pubTimestamp":1628906786,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2159521376?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-08-14 10:06","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Chasing Tesla: Here are the current electric vehicle plans of every major car maker","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2159521376","media":"MarketWatch","summary":"At President Joe Biden's urging, the auto industry pledged to boost production of electric vehicles ","content":"<p>At President Joe Biden's urging, the auto industry pledged to boost production of electric vehicles to the point that they account for about half of total U.S. sales by 2030, a plan that raises hopes that EVs can shift from niche to normal.</p>\n<p>EVs accounted for 2.4% of U.S. cars sold in 2020, up from 0.7% five years ago, according to BloombergNEF. The research provider expects that share to increase to 11% in 2025; by 2030, it expects that slightly over a third of vehicles sold in the U.S. will be electric.</p>\n<p>Several auto makers had already announced bigger EV ambitions even before the White House call.</p>\n<p>Here are each major car maker's stated plans for EVs, including, when available, investment amounts and the range of models they hope to bring to market.</p>\n<p>This information was collated from company sites, previous reports, and BloombergNEF projections, and will be updated regularly.</p>\n<p><b>Audi</b></p>\n<p>Audi, a brand known for its luxury cars and owned by Germany's Volkswagen AG , has promised to have battery-electric vehicles comprise 35% of its sales by 2025. By that time, Audi buyers will choose from about 20 EV models.</p>\n<p><b>BMW</b></p>\n<p>BMW AG , a luxury-car maker from Germany, was among the first EV innovators. It launched its i3 compact EV eight years ago, then as $one of the few serious competitors to Tesla Inc.'s vehicles.</p>\n<p>BMW's EV pipeline has slowed, but the auto maker has promised that 25% of its European sales will be all-electric and hybrid vehicles this year, and that all sales of its Mini brand will be battery electric by 2030. It expects to launch more than 10 battery EVs models in the next couple of years.</p>\n<p><b>Daimler/Mercedes-Benz</b></p>\n<p>Mercedes-Benz, owned by Daimler AG , expects that between 15% and 25% of its sales will be comprised of EV sales by 2025; by 2030, that percentage is expected to grow to 50%. Mercedes-Benz is slated to end 2021 offering three new electric passenger car models and more to come in 2022.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ec4b2abd59e5b19c9eec0034342af25e\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"413\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>SOURCE: MERCEDES</span></p>\n<p><b>Ford</b></p>\n<p>Ford Motor Co. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/F\">$(F)$</a> has said that 40% of its global sales by 2030 will be sales of EVs . Ford is aiming to have dozens of electrified models by 2022, the year that will also mark the debut of its much-awaited all-electric F-150 Lightning pickup truck.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3a44fec36dac046911679a2ba769cb2b\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"450\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>The Ford F-150 Lightning o JEFF KOWALSKY/AGENCE FRANCE-PRESSE/GETTY IMAGES</span></p>\n<p>Ford has called the Lightning the \"pillar\" of its more than $22 billion bet on EVs, which includes EV models for other best-selling vehicles such as the Mustang and its Transit van.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/87df52ddef1af1d1342d685897e83652\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"392\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>SOURCE: FORD</span></p>\n<p><b>GM</b></p>\n<p>General Motors Co. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GM\">$(GM)$</a> surprised Wall Street in January by saying it aims to phase out all of its internal combustion engine vehicles by 2035 and only sell zero-emission vehicles by then. The auto maker also promises to be carbon-neutral by 2040.</p>\n<p>GM has said that it will offer 30 all-electric models globally by mid-decade, and that 40% percent of the company's U.S. models will be battery electric vehicles by the end of 2025. Its Hummer electric is expected for next year, with production starting this fall.</p>\n<p><b>Honda</b></p>\n<p>The Japanese maker (7267.TO), which owns the namesake Honda brand and also the luxury-car brand Acura, is projected to derive 40% of its sales from EVs and fuel-cell electric cars by 2030. In April 2020, Honda and GM announced a partnership to develop Honda electric cars using GM's Ultium batteries.</p>\n<p><b>Hyundai</b></p>\n<p>The Korean car maker , which also owns Kia, is aiming to have 40% of its Kia and Hyundai brands sales to be of EVs and fuel-cell electric vehicles by 2025. Its Hyundai brand plans on more than 30 electric passenger vehicles by then.</p>\n<p><b>Mazda</b></p>\n<p>Mazda plans to offer 5% of its vehicles as battery electric by 2030, but EV sales targets as a percentage of total sales are unknown at the moment. Mazda does not offer EVs in the U.S., but sells a few EV and hybrid models elsewhere.</p>\n<p><b>Nissan</b></p>\n<p>Nissan Motor Co. Ltd. was among the first auto makers to offer an all-electric vehicle, and its the Nissan Leaf for years was one of the few options available for those without the deep pockets needed for a Tesla Inc. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">$(TSLA)$</a> Model S.</p>\n<p>Nissan plans to offer 20 EV models in China by next year, and for the U.S. the company recently said it plans that more than 40% of its U.S. vehicle sales by 2030 will be fully electric.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5cbdfabce43725b3d966cf5db5b820f6\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>The Nissan Leaf NISSAN</span></p>\n<p><b>Porsche</b></p>\n<p>The car maker and almost synonym of sports cars is aiming to have half of its sales be of EV vehicles by 2025.</p>\n<p><b>Stellantis</b></p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/STLA\">Stellantis NV</a> (STLA.MI), the global auto maker formed earlier this year through the merger of Fiat Chrysler Automobiles NV and France's PSA Group, said in July it was investing $35 billion in EVs and adjacent technologies through 2025.</p>\n<p>By that year, Stellantis is expected to derive 31% of its U.S. sales and 38% of its European sales from EVs, percentages that are seen growing to 35% of U.S. sales and 70% of European sales by 2030.</p>\n<p><b>Subaru</b></p>\n<p>The Japanese maker is expected to derive 40% of its sales from EVs and hybrid electric vehicles by 2030.</p>\n<p><b>Toyota</b></p>\n<p>Some 70% of sales for the world's No. 1 car maker (7203.TO) are expected to come from EVs and fuel-cell electric vehicles by 2030. Toyota plans to offer 15 battery EV models by 2025. The car maker, of course, broke ground with its hybrid Toyota Prius two decades ago.</p>\n<p><b>Volkswagen</b></p>\n<p>The car maker is expected to derive 70% of its European sales from EVs and 50% of its U.S. sales from EVs by 2030. Volkswagen has pledged to spend about $40 billion through 2025 on EVs.</p>","source":"lsy1603348471595","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Chasing Tesla: Here are the current electric vehicle plans of every major car maker</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nChasing Tesla: Here are the current electric vehicle plans of every major car maker\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-08-14 10:06 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.marketwatch.com/story/chasing-tesla-here-are-the-current-electric-vehicle-plans-of-every-major-car-maker-11628876816?mod=home-page><strong>MarketWatch</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>At President Joe Biden's urging, the auto industry pledged to boost production of electric vehicles to the point that they account for about half of total U.S. sales by 2030, a plan that raises hopes ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/chasing-tesla-here-are-the-current-electric-vehicle-plans-of-every-major-car-maker-11628876816?mod=home-page\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"HYEVF":"Hyundai Elevator Co Ltd.","TM":"丰田汽车","STLA":"Stellantis NV","F":"福特汽车","NSANY":"日产汽车","GM":"通用汽车","FUJHF":"Subaru Corporation ","DDAIF":"戴姆勒汽车","HMC":"本田汽车","TSLA":"特斯拉","VLKAF":"Volkswagen AG"},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/chasing-tesla-here-are-the-current-electric-vehicle-plans-of-every-major-car-maker-11628876816?mod=home-page","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2159521376","content_text":"At President Joe Biden's urging, the auto industry pledged to boost production of electric vehicles to the point that they account for about half of total U.S. sales by 2030, a plan that raises hopes that EVs can shift from niche to normal.\nEVs accounted for 2.4% of U.S. cars sold in 2020, up from 0.7% five years ago, according to BloombergNEF. The research provider expects that share to increase to 11% in 2025; by 2030, it expects that slightly over a third of vehicles sold in the U.S. will be electric.\nSeveral auto makers had already announced bigger EV ambitions even before the White House call.\nHere are each major car maker's stated plans for EVs, including, when available, investment amounts and the range of models they hope to bring to market.\nThis information was collated from company sites, previous reports, and BloombergNEF projections, and will be updated regularly.\nAudi\nAudi, a brand known for its luxury cars and owned by Germany's Volkswagen AG , has promised to have battery-electric vehicles comprise 35% of its sales by 2025. By that time, Audi buyers will choose from about 20 EV models.\nBMW\nBMW AG , a luxury-car maker from Germany, was among the first EV innovators. It launched its i3 compact EV eight years ago, then as $one of the few serious competitors to Tesla Inc.'s vehicles.\nBMW's EV pipeline has slowed, but the auto maker has promised that 25% of its European sales will be all-electric and hybrid vehicles this year, and that all sales of its Mini brand will be battery electric by 2030. It expects to launch more than 10 battery EVs models in the next couple of years.\nDaimler/Mercedes-Benz\nMercedes-Benz, owned by Daimler AG , expects that between 15% and 25% of its sales will be comprised of EV sales by 2025; by 2030, that percentage is expected to grow to 50%. Mercedes-Benz is slated to end 2021 offering three new electric passenger car models and more to come in 2022.\nSOURCE: MERCEDES\nFord\nFord Motor Co. $(F)$ has said that 40% of its global sales by 2030 will be sales of EVs . Ford is aiming to have dozens of electrified models by 2022, the year that will also mark the debut of its much-awaited all-electric F-150 Lightning pickup truck.\nThe Ford F-150 Lightning o JEFF KOWALSKY/AGENCE FRANCE-PRESSE/GETTY IMAGES\nFord has called the Lightning the \"pillar\" of its more than $22 billion bet on EVs, which includes EV models for other best-selling vehicles such as the Mustang and its Transit van.\nSOURCE: FORD\nGM\nGeneral Motors Co. $(GM)$ surprised Wall Street in January by saying it aims to phase out all of its internal combustion engine vehicles by 2035 and only sell zero-emission vehicles by then. The auto maker also promises to be carbon-neutral by 2040.\nGM has said that it will offer 30 all-electric models globally by mid-decade, and that 40% percent of the company's U.S. models will be battery electric vehicles by the end of 2025. Its Hummer electric is expected for next year, with production starting this fall.\nHonda\nThe Japanese maker (7267.TO), which owns the namesake Honda brand and also the luxury-car brand Acura, is projected to derive 40% of its sales from EVs and fuel-cell electric cars by 2030. In April 2020, Honda and GM announced a partnership to develop Honda electric cars using GM's Ultium batteries.\nHyundai\nThe Korean car maker , which also owns Kia, is aiming to have 40% of its Kia and Hyundai brands sales to be of EVs and fuel-cell electric vehicles by 2025. Its Hyundai brand plans on more than 30 electric passenger vehicles by then.\nMazda\nMazda plans to offer 5% of its vehicles as battery electric by 2030, but EV sales targets as a percentage of total sales are unknown at the moment. Mazda does not offer EVs in the U.S., but sells a few EV and hybrid models elsewhere.\nNissan\nNissan Motor Co. Ltd. was among the first auto makers to offer an all-electric vehicle, and its the Nissan Leaf for years was one of the few options available for those without the deep pockets needed for a Tesla Inc. $(TSLA)$ Model S.\nNissan plans to offer 20 EV models in China by next year, and for the U.S. the company recently said it plans that more than 40% of its U.S. vehicle sales by 2030 will be fully electric.\nThe Nissan Leaf NISSAN\nPorsche\nThe car maker and almost synonym of sports cars is aiming to have half of its sales be of EV vehicles by 2025.\nStellantis\nStellantis NV (STLA.MI), the global auto maker formed earlier this year through the merger of Fiat Chrysler Automobiles NV and France's PSA Group, said in July it was investing $35 billion in EVs and adjacent technologies through 2025.\nBy that year, Stellantis is expected to derive 31% of its U.S. sales and 38% of its European sales from EVs, percentages that are seen growing to 35% of U.S. sales and 70% of European sales by 2030.\nSubaru\nThe Japanese maker is expected to derive 40% of its sales from EVs and hybrid electric vehicles by 2030.\nToyota\nSome 70% of sales for the world's No. 1 car maker (7203.TO) are expected to come from EVs and fuel-cell electric vehicles by 2030. Toyota plans to offer 15 battery EV models by 2025. The car maker, of course, broke ground with its hybrid Toyota Prius two decades ago.\nVolkswagen\nThe car maker is expected to derive 70% of its European sales from EVs and 50% of its U.S. sales from EVs by 2030. Volkswagen has pledged to spend about $40 billion through 2025 on EVs.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":48,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":814221023,"gmtCreate":1630828032362,"gmtModify":1676530402559,"author":{"id":"3577409082356068","authorId":"3577409082356068","name":"babiboo","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8be2f9f25874d7f974661428b042a2e7","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577409082356068","authorIdStr":"3577409082356068"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Whatt","listText":"Whatt","text":"Whatt","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":4,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/814221023","repostId":"1157895022","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1157895022","pubTimestamp":1630810619,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1157895022?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-09-05 10:56","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Beat the market with this quant system that’s very bullish on stocks at record highs","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1157895022","media":"MarketWatch","summary":"Vance Howard’s HCM Tactical Growth Fund moves you in and out of the stock market when prudent to do ","content":"<blockquote>\n <b>Vance Howard’s HCM Tactical Growth Fund moves you in and out of the stock market when prudent to do so. So far his team of computer scientists’ strategy has paid off.</b>\n</blockquote>\n<p>Imagine you had a money-making machine to harvest gains in the stock market while you sat back to enjoy life.</p>\n<p>That’s everyone’s dream, right? Investor Vance Howard thinks he’s found it.</p>\n<p>Howard and his small army of computer programmers atHoward Capital Managementin Roswell, Ga., have a quantitative system that posts great returns.</p>\n<p>His HCM Tactical Growth Fund&nbsp;HCMGX,+0.35%beats its Russell 1000&nbsp;benchmark index and large-blend fund category by 8.5-10.4 percentage points annualized over the past five years, according to Morningstar. That is no small feat, and not only because it has to overcome a 2.22% fee. Beating the market is simply not easy. His HCM Dividend Sector PlusHCMQX,-0.05%) and HCM Income PlusHCMLX,+0.30%funds post similar outperformance.</p>\n<p>There are drawbacks, which I detail below. (Among them: Potentially long stretches of underperformance and regular tax bills.) But first, what can we learn from this winner?</p>\n<p>So-called quants never share all the details of their proprietary systems, but Howard shares a lot, as you’ll see. And this Texas rancher has a lot of good advice based on “horse sense” — not surprising, given his infectious passion for the markets, and his three decades of experience as a pro.</p>\n<p>Here are five lessons, 12 exchange traded funds (ETFs) and four stocks to consider, from a recent interview with him.</p>\n<p><b>Lesson #1: Don’t be emotional</b></p>\n<p>It’s no surprise so many people do poorly in the market. Evolution has programmed us to fail. For survival, we’ve learned to run from things that frightens us. And crave more of things that are pleasurable — like sweets or fats to store calories ahead of what might be a long stretch without food. But in the market, acting on the emotions of fear and greed invariably make us do the wrong thing at the wrong time. Sell at the bottom, buy at the top.</p>\n<p>Likewise, we’re programmed to believe being with the crowd brings safety. If you’re a zebra on the Savanna, you are more likely to get picked off by a predator if you go it alone. The problem here is being part of a crowd — and crowd psychology — dumb us down to a purely emotional level. This is why people in crowds do terrible things they would never do on their own. It doesn’t matter how smart you are. When you join a crowd, you lose a lot of IQ points. Base emotions take over.</p>\n<p>To do well in the market, you have to counteract these tendencies. “One of the biggest mistakes individual investors and money managers make is getting emotional,” says Howard. “Let your emotions go.”</p>\n<p><b>Lesson #2: Have a system and stick to it</b></p>\n<p>To exorcise emotion, have a system. “And don’t second guess it,” says Howard. “This keeps you from letting the pandemic or Afghanistan scare you out of the market.” He calls his system the HCM-BuyLine. It is basically a momentum and trend-following system — which often works well in the markets.</p>\n<p>The HCM-BuyLine basically works like this. First, rather than use the S&amp;P 500SPX,-0.03%or the Dow Jones Industrial AverageDJIA,-0.21%,Howard blends several stock indices to create his own index. Then he uses a moving average that tells him whether the market is in an uptrend or downtrend.</p>\n<p>When the moving average drops 3.5%, he sells 35%. If it drops 6.5%, he sells another 35%. He rarely goes to 100% cash.</p>\n<p>“If the BuyLine is positive, we will stay long no matter what,” he says. “We take all the emotion out of the equation by letting the math decide.”</p>\n<p>Right now, it’s bullish. (More on this below.)</p>\n<p>Your system also has to tell you when to get back in.</p>\n<p>“That’s where most people screw up,” he says. “They get out of the market, and they don’t know when to get back in.” The HCM-BuyLine gives a buy signal when his custom index trades above its moving average for six consecutive sessions, and then goes on to trade above the high hit during those six days.</p>\n<p>You don’t need a system that calls exact market tops or bottoms. Instead, the BuyLine keeps Howard out of down markets 85% of the time, and in for 85% of the good times.</p>\n<p>“If we can do that consistently, we have superior returns and a less stressful life,” he says. “Being all in during a bad tape is no fun.”</p>\n<p>His system is slow to get him out of the market, but quick to get him back in. Not even a 10% correction will necessarily move him out. He’s often buying those pullbacks. Getting back in fast makes sense, because recoveries off bottoms tend to happen fast.</p>\n<p>“The HCM-BuyLine takes all the emotion out of the process,” says Howard.</p>\n<p><b>Lesson #3: Don’t fight the tape</b></p>\n<p>This concept is one of the core pieces of wisdom from Marty Zweig’s classic book, “Winning on Wall Street.”</p>\n<p>“You have to stay on the right side of market,” agrees Howard. “If you try to trade long in a bad market, it is painful.”</p>\n<p>In other words, don’t try to be a hero.</p>\n<p>“Sometimes, not losing money is where you want to be,” he says.</p>\n<p>Likewise, don’t turn cautious just because the market hits new highs — like now. You should love new highs, because it is a sign of market strength that may likely endure.</p>\n<p><b>Lesson #4: Keep it simple</b></p>\n<p>As you’ll see below, Howard doesn’t use esoteric instruments such as derivatives, swaps or index options. He doesn’t even trade foreign stocks or currencies. This is refreshing for individual investors, because we have a harder time accessing those tools.</p>\n<p>“You don’t have to trade crazy stuff,” he says. “You can trade plain-vanilla ETFs and beat everybody out there.”</p>\n<p><b>Lesson #5: How to trade the current market</b></p>\n<p>First, be long.</p>\n<p>“The HCM-BuyLine is very positive. We are 100% in,” says Howard. “The market is broadening out. It is getting pretty exciting. We do not see it turn around any time soon. We are buying pullbacks.”</p>\n<p>One bullish signal is all the cash on the sidelines. “If there is any relief in Covid, we may see a big rally. We may end up with a great fall [season].”</p>\n<p>Howard uses momentum indicators to select stocks and ETFs, too. For sectors he favors the following.</p>\n<p>He likes health care, tradable through the iShares US HealthcareIYH,-0.04%and ProShares Ultra Health CareRXL,+0.12%ETFs. He’s turning more bullish on biotech, which he plays via the iShares Biotechnology ETFIBB,-0.11%.</p>\n<p>He likes consumer discretionary tradable through the iShares US Consumer ServicesIYC,-0.30%,and airlines via US Global JetsJETS,-1.17%.He also likes tech exposure via the Invesco QQQ TrustQQQ,+0.31%,iShares US TechnologyIYW,+0.50%and&nbsp;iShares SemiconductorSOXX,+0.75%.</p>\n<p>He likes small-caps via the Vanguard Small-Cap Growth Index FundVBK,+0.07%.And convertible bonds via SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Convertible SecuritiesCWB,+0.64%and iShares Convertible BondICVT,+0.37%.</p>\n<p>As for individual names, he singles out MicrosoftMSFT,-0.00%and AppleAAPL,+0.42%in tech, as well as Amazon.comAMZN,+0.43%and TeslaTSLA,+0.16%.</p>\n<p>Also consider Howard’s two ETFs: The HCM Defender 100 IndexQQH,+0.62%and HCM Defender 500 IndexLGH,+1.32%.</p>\n<p>He prefers to add to holdings on 1%-3% dips.</p>\n<p><b>A few drawbacks</b></p>\n<p>His HCM Tactical Growth fund has a history of posting two-year stretches of underperformance of 1.5% to 8.8%, since it was launched in 2015. The fund then came roaring back to net the very positive five-year outperformance cited above. Investing in his system can require patience.</p>\n<p>Every manager, including Warren Buffett, can have a stretch of underperformance, says Howard.</p>\n<p>“We are in the odds game,” he says. “Even in the odds game, you can have a bad hand or two thrown at you.”</p>\n<p>Another challenge is the high turnover, which is 140% a year for Tactical Growth. This means Uncle Sam takes a big cut in the good years. So if you buy Howard’s funds, you may want to do so in a tax-protected account.</p>","source":"lsy1603348471595","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Beat the market with this quant system that’s very bullish on stocks at record highs</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBeat the market with this quant system that’s very bullish on stocks at record highs\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-09-05 10:56 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.marketwatch.com/story/beat-the-market-with-this-quant-system-thats-very-bullish-on-stocks-at-record-highs-11630761531?mod=home-page><strong>MarketWatch</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Vance Howard’s HCM Tactical Growth Fund moves you in and out of the stock market when prudent to do so. So far his team of computer scientists’ strategy has paid off.\n\nImagine you had a money-making ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/beat-the-market-with-this-quant-system-thats-very-bullish-on-stocks-at-record-highs-11630761531?mod=home-page\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SPY":"标普500ETF",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/beat-the-market-with-this-quant-system-thats-very-bullish-on-stocks-at-record-highs-11630761531?mod=home-page","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1157895022","content_text":"Vance Howard’s HCM Tactical Growth Fund moves you in and out of the stock market when prudent to do so. So far his team of computer scientists’ strategy has paid off.\n\nImagine you had a money-making machine to harvest gains in the stock market while you sat back to enjoy life.\nThat’s everyone’s dream, right? Investor Vance Howard thinks he’s found it.\nHoward and his small army of computer programmers atHoward Capital Managementin Roswell, Ga., have a quantitative system that posts great returns.\nHis HCM Tactical Growth Fund HCMGX,+0.35%beats its Russell 1000 benchmark index and large-blend fund category by 8.5-10.4 percentage points annualized over the past five years, according to Morningstar. That is no small feat, and not only because it has to overcome a 2.22% fee. Beating the market is simply not easy. His HCM Dividend Sector PlusHCMQX,-0.05%) and HCM Income PlusHCMLX,+0.30%funds post similar outperformance.\nThere are drawbacks, which I detail below. (Among them: Potentially long stretches of underperformance and regular tax bills.) But first, what can we learn from this winner?\nSo-called quants never share all the details of their proprietary systems, but Howard shares a lot, as you’ll see. And this Texas rancher has a lot of good advice based on “horse sense” — not surprising, given his infectious passion for the markets, and his three decades of experience as a pro.\nHere are five lessons, 12 exchange traded funds (ETFs) and four stocks to consider, from a recent interview with him.\nLesson #1: Don’t be emotional\nIt’s no surprise so many people do poorly in the market. Evolution has programmed us to fail. For survival, we’ve learned to run from things that frightens us. And crave more of things that are pleasurable — like sweets or fats to store calories ahead of what might be a long stretch without food. But in the market, acting on the emotions of fear and greed invariably make us do the wrong thing at the wrong time. Sell at the bottom, buy at the top.\nLikewise, we’re programmed to believe being with the crowd brings safety. If you’re a zebra on the Savanna, you are more likely to get picked off by a predator if you go it alone. The problem here is being part of a crowd — and crowd psychology — dumb us down to a purely emotional level. This is why people in crowds do terrible things they would never do on their own. It doesn’t matter how smart you are. When you join a crowd, you lose a lot of IQ points. Base emotions take over.\nTo do well in the market, you have to counteract these tendencies. “One of the biggest mistakes individual investors and money managers make is getting emotional,” says Howard. “Let your emotions go.”\nLesson #2: Have a system and stick to it\nTo exorcise emotion, have a system. “And don’t second guess it,” says Howard. “This keeps you from letting the pandemic or Afghanistan scare you out of the market.” He calls his system the HCM-BuyLine. It is basically a momentum and trend-following system — which often works well in the markets.\nThe HCM-BuyLine basically works like this. First, rather than use the S&P 500SPX,-0.03%or the Dow Jones Industrial AverageDJIA,-0.21%,Howard blends several stock indices to create his own index. Then he uses a moving average that tells him whether the market is in an uptrend or downtrend.\nWhen the moving average drops 3.5%, he sells 35%. If it drops 6.5%, he sells another 35%. He rarely goes to 100% cash.\n“If the BuyLine is positive, we will stay long no matter what,” he says. “We take all the emotion out of the equation by letting the math decide.”\nRight now, it’s bullish. (More on this below.)\nYour system also has to tell you when to get back in.\n“That’s where most people screw up,” he says. “They get out of the market, and they don’t know when to get back in.” The HCM-BuyLine gives a buy signal when his custom index trades above its moving average for six consecutive sessions, and then goes on to trade above the high hit during those six days.\nYou don’t need a system that calls exact market tops or bottoms. Instead, the BuyLine keeps Howard out of down markets 85% of the time, and in for 85% of the good times.\n“If we can do that consistently, we have superior returns and a less stressful life,” he says. “Being all in during a bad tape is no fun.”\nHis system is slow to get him out of the market, but quick to get him back in. Not even a 10% correction will necessarily move him out. He’s often buying those pullbacks. Getting back in fast makes sense, because recoveries off bottoms tend to happen fast.\n“The HCM-BuyLine takes all the emotion out of the process,” says Howard.\nLesson #3: Don’t fight the tape\nThis concept is one of the core pieces of wisdom from Marty Zweig’s classic book, “Winning on Wall Street.”\n“You have to stay on the right side of market,” agrees Howard. “If you try to trade long in a bad market, it is painful.”\nIn other words, don’t try to be a hero.\n“Sometimes, not losing money is where you want to be,” he says.\nLikewise, don’t turn cautious just because the market hits new highs — like now. You should love new highs, because it is a sign of market strength that may likely endure.\nLesson #4: Keep it simple\nAs you’ll see below, Howard doesn’t use esoteric instruments such as derivatives, swaps or index options. He doesn’t even trade foreign stocks or currencies. This is refreshing for individual investors, because we have a harder time accessing those tools.\n“You don’t have to trade crazy stuff,” he says. “You can trade plain-vanilla ETFs and beat everybody out there.”\nLesson #5: How to trade the current market\nFirst, be long.\n“The HCM-BuyLine is very positive. We are 100% in,” says Howard. “The market is broadening out. It is getting pretty exciting. We do not see it turn around any time soon. We are buying pullbacks.”\nOne bullish signal is all the cash on the sidelines. “If there is any relief in Covid, we may see a big rally. We may end up with a great fall [season].”\nHoward uses momentum indicators to select stocks and ETFs, too. For sectors he favors the following.\nHe likes health care, tradable through the iShares US HealthcareIYH,-0.04%and ProShares Ultra Health CareRXL,+0.12%ETFs. He’s turning more bullish on biotech, which he plays via the iShares Biotechnology ETFIBB,-0.11%.\nHe likes consumer discretionary tradable through the iShares US Consumer ServicesIYC,-0.30%,and airlines via US Global JetsJETS,-1.17%.He also likes tech exposure via the Invesco QQQ TrustQQQ,+0.31%,iShares US TechnologyIYW,+0.50%and iShares SemiconductorSOXX,+0.75%.\nHe likes small-caps via the Vanguard Small-Cap Growth Index FundVBK,+0.07%.And convertible bonds via SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Convertible SecuritiesCWB,+0.64%and iShares Convertible BondICVT,+0.37%.\nAs for individual names, he singles out MicrosoftMSFT,-0.00%and AppleAAPL,+0.42%in tech, as well as Amazon.comAMZN,+0.43%and TeslaTSLA,+0.16%.\nAlso consider Howard’s two ETFs: The HCM Defender 100 IndexQQH,+0.62%and HCM Defender 500 IndexLGH,+1.32%.\nHe prefers to add to holdings on 1%-3% dips.\nA few drawbacks\nHis HCM Tactical Growth fund has a history of posting two-year stretches of underperformance of 1.5% to 8.8%, since it was launched in 2015. The fund then came roaring back to net the very positive five-year outperformance cited above. Investing in his system can require patience.\nEvery manager, including Warren Buffett, can have a stretch of underperformance, says Howard.\n“We are in the odds game,” he says. “Even in the odds game, you can have a bad hand or two thrown at you.”\nAnother challenge is the high turnover, which is 140% a year for Tactical Growth. This means Uncle Sam takes a big cut in the good years. So if you buy Howard’s funds, you may want to do so in a tax-protected account.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":40,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":175585492,"gmtCreate":1627041847716,"gmtModify":1703483046016,"author":{"id":"3577409082356068","authorId":"3577409082356068","name":"babiboo","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8be2f9f25874d7f974661428b042a2e7","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577409082356068","authorIdStr":"3577409082356068"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Yess","listText":"Yess","text":"Yess","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":8,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/175585492","repostId":"1164478982","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1164478982","pubTimestamp":1626995319,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1164478982?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-23 07:08","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Wall Street ekes out gains, led by tech, growth stocks","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1164478982","media":"Reuters","summary":"NEW YORK  - Big tech helped Wall Street inch up to a higher close on Thursday, modestly building on a two-day rally as lackluster economic data and mixed corporate earnings prompted a pivot back to growth stocks.A pull-back in economically sensitive cyclicals kept the S&P 500’s and the blue-chip Dow’s gains muted, while small-caps underperformed their larger rivals.“The market is flip-flopping between the view that economic growth has almost peaked so you need to buy stocks that manufacture thei","content":"<p>NEW YORK (Reuters) - Big tech helped Wall Street inch up to a higher close on Thursday, modestly building on a two-day rally as lackluster economic data and mixed corporate earnings prompted a pivot back to growth stocks.</p>\n<p>A pull-back in economically sensitive cyclicals kept the S&amp;P 500’s and the blue-chip Dow’s gains muted, while small-caps underperformed their larger rivals.</p>\n<p>But megacap tech and tech-adjacent stocks, such as Microsoft Corp, Amazon.com, Apple Inc, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FB\">Facebook</a> Inc and Alphabet Inc, rose ahead of their quarterly results next week, putting the Nasdaq out front.</p>\n<p>All three major U.S. stock indexes ended the session within 1% of their record closing highs.</p>\n<p>Growth stocks, which outperformed throughout the health crisis, were back in favor, gaining 0.8%, while the value index slipped by 0.5%.</p>\n<p>“The market is flip-flopping between the view that economic growth has almost peaked so you need to buy stocks that manufacture their own growth like tech names, versus the view that economic growth will continue and you want to own cyclicals and value names,” said David Carter, chief investment officer at Lenox Wealth Advisors in New York.</p>\n<p>The number of U.S. workers filing first-time applications for unemployment benefits spiked unexpectedly to 419,000 last week, a two-month high, according to the Labor Department.</p>\n<p>Market participants are closely watching labor market indicators for hints as to when the Federal Reserve, expected to convene next week for its two-day monetary policy meeting, will begin discussions about hiking key interest rates from near zero.</p>\n<p>“The jobless data today didn’t have a meaningful impact on markets or the economic outlook,” Carter added. “It’s now all about how much longer the Fed will tolerate low rates. The Fed seems to be favoring its full employment mandate more than its price stability mandate.”</p>\n<p>“Accordingly, the upcoming Fed meeting could be impactful,” Carter said.</p>\n<p>Benchmark Treasury yields eased after the bid at the largest-ever TIPS auction touched a record low, pressuring rate sensitive banks.</p>\n<p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 25.35 points, or 0.07%, to 34,823.35, the S&amp;P 500 gained 8.79 points, or 0.20%, to 4,367.48 and the Nasdaq Composite added 52.64 points, or 0.36%, to 14,684.60.</p>\n<p>Of the 11 major sectors of the S&amp;P 500, tech was shining brightest, gaining 0.7%. Energy stocks suffered the largest percentage drop.</p>\n<p>The second-quarter reporting season barreled ahead at full-throttle, with 104 of the companies in the S&amp;P 500 having reported. Of those, 88% have beaten consensus estimates, according to Refinitiv.</p>\n<p>Drugmaker Biogen Inc gained 1.1% after hiking its full-year revenue guidance, while Domino’s Pizza Inc surged 14.6% to an all-time high on the heels of its quarterly report.</p>\n<p>Southwest Airlines Co posted a bigger-than-expected quarterly loss, sending its stock down 3.5%, and American Airlines Group Inc dipped 1.1% even after reporting a quarterly profit.</p>\n<p>The S&amp;P 1500 Airlines index ended the session off 1.7%.</p>\n<p>Shares of Texas Instruments Inc slid 5.3% after its current-quarter revenue forecast cast concerns as to whether the company will be able to meet spiking demand in the face of a global semiconductor shortage.</p>\n<p>The Philadelphia SE Semiconductor index ended the session down 0.9%.</p>\n<p>Chipmaker Intel Corp slipped more than 1% in extended trading after the chipmaker posted results and raised its annual revenue forecast.</p>\n<p>Declining issues outnumbered advancing ones on the NYSE by a 1.82-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 1.90-to-1 ratio favored decliners.</p>\n<p>The S&amp;P 500 posted 39 new 52-week highs and no new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 70 new highs and 54 new lows.</p>\n<p>Volume on U.S. exchanges was 8.25 billion shares, compared with the 10.12 billion average over the last 20 trading days.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Wall Street ekes out gains, led by tech, growth stocks</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWall Street ekes out gains, led by tech, growth stocks\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-23 07:08 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.reuters.com/article/usa-stocks/us-stocks-wall-street-ekes-out-gains-led-by-tech-growth-stocks-idUSL1N2OY2HH><strong>Reuters</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>NEW YORK (Reuters) - Big tech helped Wall Street inch up to a higher close on Thursday, modestly building on a two-day rally as lackluster economic data and mixed corporate earnings prompted a pivot ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.reuters.com/article/usa-stocks/us-stocks-wall-street-ekes-out-gains-led-by-tech-growth-stocks-idUSL1N2OY2HH\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://www.reuters.com/article/usa-stocks/us-stocks-wall-street-ekes-out-gains-led-by-tech-growth-stocks-idUSL1N2OY2HH","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1164478982","content_text":"NEW YORK (Reuters) - Big tech helped Wall Street inch up to a higher close on Thursday, modestly building on a two-day rally as lackluster economic data and mixed corporate earnings prompted a pivot back to growth stocks.\nA pull-back in economically sensitive cyclicals kept the S&P 500’s and the blue-chip Dow’s gains muted, while small-caps underperformed their larger rivals.\nBut megacap tech and tech-adjacent stocks, such as Microsoft Corp, Amazon.com, Apple Inc, Facebook Inc and Alphabet Inc, rose ahead of their quarterly results next week, putting the Nasdaq out front.\nAll three major U.S. stock indexes ended the session within 1% of their record closing highs.\nGrowth stocks, which outperformed throughout the health crisis, were back in favor, gaining 0.8%, while the value index slipped by 0.5%.\n“The market is flip-flopping between the view that economic growth has almost peaked so you need to buy stocks that manufacture their own growth like tech names, versus the view that economic growth will continue and you want to own cyclicals and value names,” said David Carter, chief investment officer at Lenox Wealth Advisors in New York.\nThe number of U.S. workers filing first-time applications for unemployment benefits spiked unexpectedly to 419,000 last week, a two-month high, according to the Labor Department.\nMarket participants are closely watching labor market indicators for hints as to when the Federal Reserve, expected to convene next week for its two-day monetary policy meeting, will begin discussions about hiking key interest rates from near zero.\n“The jobless data today didn’t have a meaningful impact on markets or the economic outlook,” Carter added. “It’s now all about how much longer the Fed will tolerate low rates. The Fed seems to be favoring its full employment mandate more than its price stability mandate.”\n“Accordingly, the upcoming Fed meeting could be impactful,” Carter said.\nBenchmark Treasury yields eased after the bid at the largest-ever TIPS auction touched a record low, pressuring rate sensitive banks.\nThe Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 25.35 points, or 0.07%, to 34,823.35, the S&P 500 gained 8.79 points, or 0.20%, to 4,367.48 and the Nasdaq Composite added 52.64 points, or 0.36%, to 14,684.60.\nOf the 11 major sectors of the S&P 500, tech was shining brightest, gaining 0.7%. Energy stocks suffered the largest percentage drop.\nThe second-quarter reporting season barreled ahead at full-throttle, with 104 of the companies in the S&P 500 having reported. Of those, 88% have beaten consensus estimates, according to Refinitiv.\nDrugmaker Biogen Inc gained 1.1% after hiking its full-year revenue guidance, while Domino’s Pizza Inc surged 14.6% to an all-time high on the heels of its quarterly report.\nSouthwest Airlines Co posted a bigger-than-expected quarterly loss, sending its stock down 3.5%, and American Airlines Group Inc dipped 1.1% even after reporting a quarterly profit.\nThe S&P 1500 Airlines index ended the session off 1.7%.\nShares of Texas Instruments Inc slid 5.3% after its current-quarter revenue forecast cast concerns as to whether the company will be able to meet spiking demand in the face of a global semiconductor shortage.\nThe Philadelphia SE Semiconductor index ended the session down 0.9%.\nChipmaker Intel Corp slipped more than 1% in extended trading after the chipmaker posted results and raised its annual revenue forecast.\nDeclining issues outnumbered advancing ones on the NYSE by a 1.82-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 1.90-to-1 ratio favored decliners.\nThe S&P 500 posted 39 new 52-week highs and no new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 70 new highs and 54 new lows.\nVolume on U.S. exchanges was 8.25 billion shares, compared with the 10.12 billion average over the last 20 trading days.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":175,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":158027537,"gmtCreate":1625115254829,"gmtModify":1703736472768,"author":{"id":"3577409082356068","authorId":"3577409082356068","name":"babiboo","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8be2f9f25874d7f974661428b042a2e7","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577409082356068","authorIdStr":"3577409082356068"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"As always apple is good.&nbsp;","listText":"As always apple is good.&nbsp;","text":"As always apple is good.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/158027537","repostId":"1110936297","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1110936297","pubTimestamp":1625036047,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1110936297?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-30 14:54","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple: Act Quickly Before The Run To $172","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1110936297","media":"seekingalpha","summary":"Apple faces many external threats from regulators in the developed world.But I see these as largely priced in, although they remain a threat longer term.Apple is on the cusp of what should be a pre-earnings run and an imminent breakout of a bullish consolidation pattern.I have made it no secret that I’m a big fan of Apple. In fact, I wrote a very bullish piece about six weeks ago, detailing how I thought Apple was in the process of consolidating before a big breakout. In this article, I want to ","content":"<p><b>Summary</b></p>\n<ul>\n <li>Apple faces many external threats from regulators in the developed world.</li>\n <li>But I see these as largely priced in, although they remain a threat longer term.</li>\n <li>Apple is on the cusp of what should be a pre-earnings run and an imminent breakout of a bullish consolidation pattern.</li>\n</ul>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/219c4f41554f7e91be4c02cd87e3f8d6\" tg-width=\"1536\" tg-height=\"1024\"><span>fMing Yeung/Getty Images News</span></p>\n<p>I have made it no secret that I’m a big fan of&nbsp;<b>Apple</b>(AAPL). In fact, I wrote a very bullish piece about six weeks ago, detailing how I thought Apple was in the process of consolidating before a&nbsp;big breakout. In this article, I want to update readers on the progress of that, as well as addressing some concerns that could be potentially bearish. But the spoiler alert is that I’m still very much in the camp of Apple setting up a breakout, and I think the company’s typical pre-earnings move is likely the catalyst to see that happen.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/37078c4ff01404a43176bb2e2555834d\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"615\"><span>Source: StockCharts</span></p>\n<p>To start, I’ve annotated the same ascending triangle formation I noted six weeks ago, because it is still very much in play. The stock is very near the top of the triangle today, so what happens when/if it gets to $136/$137 will determine if the breakout is imminent or if we need at least one more test of the rising trend line that forms the bottom of the triangle. Whether that occurs or not doesn’t change my outlook; only the timing of it.</p>\n<p>Ascending triangles measure upside targets on breakouts equal to the top and bottom of the widest part of the triangle. In this case, the top of the triangle is $137 and the bottom of the triangle, which was set in September of last year, was $102. That means that this triangle pattern has a measured price target – after the breakout – of $35 higher ($137 minus $102), and with the breakout point being $137 or so, that implies we canexpect Apple to hit $172, give or take. Now, that won’t happen immediately, of course, but that’s the kind of opportunity at hand here.</p>\n<p>What do you need to look for on a breakout? First, price action needs to decisively clear the breakout level of $137 and close above it. In addition, you want to see rising volume on the breakout – I’ve annotated declining volume in the triangle period, which is normal behavior – and you want to see rising momentum, we’ve got rising momentum today. So I’d expect a breakout to continue that, but these are the things you want to see on a breakout to ensure it has staying power.</p>\n<p>Finally, you’ll notice that I’ve added blue circles on the chart, and those represent the start of the ~4-week period prior to an earnings release. Apple has been<i>very</i>reliable in the past couple of years in terms of rallying into an earnings report, and I have no reason to think that will change. The gains are fairly large in most cases, with about half of them being in the double-digits, so this is a real catalyst for higher prices.</p>\n<p>The important thing to note is that we are about four weeks from the third quarter report, which typically takes place at the end of July. We are also at the top of the ascending triangle, which means that even a small pre-earnings run will likely result in a breakout, and that’s why I think the breakout is very near.</p>\n<p>To be clear, I’m reiterating my prior thesis that an ascending triangle breakout is coming; I just think we have a very clear catalyst now to make it sooner than later. I see the stock rallying into the earnings report, and if history is a guide, Apple will destroy expectations once again. In short, all is going to plan.</p>\n<p>The risk is that if Apple does break out of the triangle and earnings aren’t very good, the pattern could fail. That would negate my $172 price target, and we’d have to reassess. For now, the odds of that look low, and I’m still full steam ahead on the breakout coming pre-earnings.</p>\n<p><b>Why does Apple rally pre-earnings?</b></p>\n<p>To put it succinctly, Apple rallies pre-earnings because no matter how much analysts raise their targets going into the reports, Apple finds a way to beat them.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6233212bc10ea38f20e75d2ed0ab603e\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"284\"><span>Source:Seeking Alpha</span></p>\n<p>This is three years’ worth of data showing how Apple beats expectations, and by enormous margins in some cases. Apple is one of the largest and most-followed companies that has ever existed. So if any company should have an analyst community that knows how it will perform each quarter, it would be this one. However, its dominance in hardware and services revenue has proven too much for analysts over time to keep up with.</p>\n<p>Keep in mind a risk here is that if Apple does finally miss expectations, I have to imagine the stock will react extremely poorly. Thus, there is certainly risk in owning Apple through the earnings report, as with any other stock. But the company’s history of smashing expectations – particularly in the past year – means the odds of this are fairly low. Still, something to keep in mind from a risk perspective.</p>\n<p>In terms of a catalyst for rallying into the July report, Apple continues to see analysts scramble to keep up with its rising fortunes.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ebf56ca48e2364fd7314f9140bc3ab5c\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"286\"><span>Source:Seeking Alpha</span></p>\n<p>The sharp upward revisions that began last summer continue unabated, and Apple’s earnings trajectory remains very much intact. I detailed this in my last piece so I’m simply saying that nothing has changed on this front, and that’s a very good thing.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d2bd9aaadd1cc3a29d7b8e787296ab4b\" tg-width=\"454\" tg-height=\"110\"><span>Source:Seeking Alpha</span></p>\n<p>I think you’ll struggle to find a company with a better earnings revision schedule, as the past three months have seen 36 EPS revisions, and<i>100%</i>of them were upward. That shows just how strong Apple’s earnings trajectory is, as analysts scramble to meet Apple’s outstanding performances. I love stocks with earnings revision charts like Apple’s because the bar is always rising, which means that the stock will follow suit.</p>\n<p><b>Not all is well</b></p>\n<p>Apple, to be fair, does face a huge amount of risks that are outside of its control. Many of them cropped up since my last report on Apple and so I want to balance my bullish position on the stock with some sobering reality to ensure readers are well-equipped to make an informed decision about whether or not Apple is right for their portfolio.</p>\n<p>First, the FTC made the headlines a few weeks ago by appointing&nbsp;Lina Khan, an outspoken and noted big tech critic, who feels certain companies have too much control over the behaviors of consumers. This is a noteworthy development because if the FTC wants to go after big tech, Apple is a very logical early target. I don’t see it impacting iPhone or other hardware sales but services revenue? Absolutely. This is a longer-term threat since antitrust rules take time to create, but Apple shareholders need to take this threat seriously.</p>\n<p>The&nbsp;White Houseis apparently on board with this line of thinking, and the&nbsp;House&nbsp;is actually considering legislation that would undertake to reign in the perceived control of big tech companies, including Apple's tendency to pre-install its own apps on Apple devices. Would that stop consumers from just going to the app store and downloading them? No, but it certainly isn't a<i>positive</i>&nbsp;catalyst.</p>\n<p>Apple is facing a similar threat in&nbsp;Germany&nbsp;and other places in the developed world, so it isn’t just a problem at home. Germany is assessing if Apple has “competition violations” to be addressed. So the issue is the same one being faced in the US, and the only two outcomes are neutral (nothing happens), or negative (antitrust action is taken).</p>\n<p>Apple is also still very much beholden to the never-ending trade war between&nbsp;China&nbsp;and the US, as the two countries constantly jockey for position with the highest stakes the world has ever seen in such a scuffle. Apple’s production process is potentially at risk, depending upon how ugly things get, adding some geopolitical risk to the stock's outlook. This goes both ways, and China employs a lot of people and generates a lot of cash from Apple’s production. So I’m not sure it is as one-sided as it seems, but the geopolitical risk is never a good thing, and Apple’s manufacturing needs set it up for such a risk.</p>\n<p><b>Final thoughts</b></p>\n<p>I’ve enumerated a variety of potential issues Apple is facing, and I’ll be clear and say none of these are good things. The best possible outcome is that nothing changes, and the worst is that all come to fruition and Apple faces manufacturing challenges, as well as antitrust actions. These are real threats, but I also think they're already priced in.</p>\n<p>The threat of antitrust legislation or a trade war with China isn’t new by any stretch of the imagination and is not dissimilar to the threats that other tech giants like Amazon (AMZN), Alphabet (GOOG), or Facebook (FB) face every day. This is par for the course if you’re a dominant tech company, and Apple certainly is. I don’t want to ignore these potential negative catalysts, but I don’t want to overreact, either.</p>\n<p>Keep in mind also that Apple continues to move higher over time despite this bad news, which is what winning stocks do. The fact that it is shrugging off these huge potential negative catalysts reinforces the bullish stance I already had on the stock.</p>\n<p>I detailed my bullishness on the company’s revenue generation, margins, buybacks, valuation, and more in the&nbsp;prior piece, and nothing has changed there. So I don’t want to waste your time going through it again. However, my fundamental stance on Apple hasn’t changed in the past six weeks, and if anything, continued upward revisions in EPS estimates have strengthened the bull case.</p>\n<p>The important thing is that shareholders must be aware of external threats, but also that we are seeing Apple get to the end of its very bullish consolidation pattern at the same time that it typically begins a pre-earnings run higher.</p>\n<p>The bottom line is that I think Apple’s breakout is imminent, and that the pattern measures to $172 or so. This won’t happen overnight, but if you were looking to buy Apple, act quickly.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple: Act Quickly Before The Run To $172</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple: Act Quickly Before The Run To $172\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-06-30 14:54 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4437069-apple-act-quickly-before-the-run-to-172><strong>seekingalpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Summary\n\nApple faces many external threats from regulators in the developed world.\nBut I see these as largely priced in, although they remain a threat longer term.\nApple is on the cusp of what should ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4437069-apple-act-quickly-before-the-run-to-172\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4437069-apple-act-quickly-before-the-run-to-172","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1110936297","content_text":"Summary\n\nApple faces many external threats from regulators in the developed world.\nBut I see these as largely priced in, although they remain a threat longer term.\nApple is on the cusp of what should be a pre-earnings run and an imminent breakout of a bullish consolidation pattern.\n\nfMing Yeung/Getty Images News\nI have made it no secret that I’m a big fan of Apple(AAPL). In fact, I wrote a very bullish piece about six weeks ago, detailing how I thought Apple was in the process of consolidating before a big breakout. In this article, I want to update readers on the progress of that, as well as addressing some concerns that could be potentially bearish. But the spoiler alert is that I’m still very much in the camp of Apple setting up a breakout, and I think the company’s typical pre-earnings move is likely the catalyst to see that happen.\nSource: StockCharts\nTo start, I’ve annotated the same ascending triangle formation I noted six weeks ago, because it is still very much in play. The stock is very near the top of the triangle today, so what happens when/if it gets to $136/$137 will determine if the breakout is imminent or if we need at least one more test of the rising trend line that forms the bottom of the triangle. Whether that occurs or not doesn’t change my outlook; only the timing of it.\nAscending triangles measure upside targets on breakouts equal to the top and bottom of the widest part of the triangle. In this case, the top of the triangle is $137 and the bottom of the triangle, which was set in September of last year, was $102. That means that this triangle pattern has a measured price target – after the breakout – of $35 higher ($137 minus $102), and with the breakout point being $137 or so, that implies we canexpect Apple to hit $172, give or take. Now, that won’t happen immediately, of course, but that’s the kind of opportunity at hand here.\nWhat do you need to look for on a breakout? First, price action needs to decisively clear the breakout level of $137 and close above it. In addition, you want to see rising volume on the breakout – I’ve annotated declining volume in the triangle period, which is normal behavior – and you want to see rising momentum, we’ve got rising momentum today. So I’d expect a breakout to continue that, but these are the things you want to see on a breakout to ensure it has staying power.\nFinally, you’ll notice that I’ve added blue circles on the chart, and those represent the start of the ~4-week period prior to an earnings release. Apple has beenveryreliable in the past couple of years in terms of rallying into an earnings report, and I have no reason to think that will change. The gains are fairly large in most cases, with about half of them being in the double-digits, so this is a real catalyst for higher prices.\nThe important thing to note is that we are about four weeks from the third quarter report, which typically takes place at the end of July. We are also at the top of the ascending triangle, which means that even a small pre-earnings run will likely result in a breakout, and that’s why I think the breakout is very near.\nTo be clear, I’m reiterating my prior thesis that an ascending triangle breakout is coming; I just think we have a very clear catalyst now to make it sooner than later. I see the stock rallying into the earnings report, and if history is a guide, Apple will destroy expectations once again. In short, all is going to plan.\nThe risk is that if Apple does break out of the triangle and earnings aren’t very good, the pattern could fail. That would negate my $172 price target, and we’d have to reassess. For now, the odds of that look low, and I’m still full steam ahead on the breakout coming pre-earnings.\nWhy does Apple rally pre-earnings?\nTo put it succinctly, Apple rallies pre-earnings because no matter how much analysts raise their targets going into the reports, Apple finds a way to beat them.\nSource:Seeking Alpha\nThis is three years’ worth of data showing how Apple beats expectations, and by enormous margins in some cases. Apple is one of the largest and most-followed companies that has ever existed. So if any company should have an analyst community that knows how it will perform each quarter, it would be this one. However, its dominance in hardware and services revenue has proven too much for analysts over time to keep up with.\nKeep in mind a risk here is that if Apple does finally miss expectations, I have to imagine the stock will react extremely poorly. Thus, there is certainly risk in owning Apple through the earnings report, as with any other stock. But the company’s history of smashing expectations – particularly in the past year – means the odds of this are fairly low. Still, something to keep in mind from a risk perspective.\nIn terms of a catalyst for rallying into the July report, Apple continues to see analysts scramble to keep up with its rising fortunes.\nSource:Seeking Alpha\nThe sharp upward revisions that began last summer continue unabated, and Apple’s earnings trajectory remains very much intact. I detailed this in my last piece so I’m simply saying that nothing has changed on this front, and that’s a very good thing.\nSource:Seeking Alpha\nI think you’ll struggle to find a company with a better earnings revision schedule, as the past three months have seen 36 EPS revisions, and100%of them were upward. That shows just how strong Apple’s earnings trajectory is, as analysts scramble to meet Apple’s outstanding performances. I love stocks with earnings revision charts like Apple’s because the bar is always rising, which means that the stock will follow suit.\nNot all is well\nApple, to be fair, does face a huge amount of risks that are outside of its control. Many of them cropped up since my last report on Apple and so I want to balance my bullish position on the stock with some sobering reality to ensure readers are well-equipped to make an informed decision about whether or not Apple is right for their portfolio.\nFirst, the FTC made the headlines a few weeks ago by appointing Lina Khan, an outspoken and noted big tech critic, who feels certain companies have too much control over the behaviors of consumers. This is a noteworthy development because if the FTC wants to go after big tech, Apple is a very logical early target. I don’t see it impacting iPhone or other hardware sales but services revenue? Absolutely. This is a longer-term threat since antitrust rules take time to create, but Apple shareholders need to take this threat seriously.\nThe White Houseis apparently on board with this line of thinking, and the House is actually considering legislation that would undertake to reign in the perceived control of big tech companies, including Apple's tendency to pre-install its own apps on Apple devices. Would that stop consumers from just going to the app store and downloading them? No, but it certainly isn't apositive catalyst.\nApple is facing a similar threat in Germany and other places in the developed world, so it isn’t just a problem at home. Germany is assessing if Apple has “competition violations” to be addressed. So the issue is the same one being faced in the US, and the only two outcomes are neutral (nothing happens), or negative (antitrust action is taken).\nApple is also still very much beholden to the never-ending trade war between China and the US, as the two countries constantly jockey for position with the highest stakes the world has ever seen in such a scuffle. Apple’s production process is potentially at risk, depending upon how ugly things get, adding some geopolitical risk to the stock's outlook. This goes both ways, and China employs a lot of people and generates a lot of cash from Apple’s production. So I’m not sure it is as one-sided as it seems, but the geopolitical risk is never a good thing, and Apple’s manufacturing needs set it up for such a risk.\nFinal thoughts\nI’ve enumerated a variety of potential issues Apple is facing, and I’ll be clear and say none of these are good things. The best possible outcome is that nothing changes, and the worst is that all come to fruition and Apple faces manufacturing challenges, as well as antitrust actions. These are real threats, but I also think they're already priced in.\nThe threat of antitrust legislation or a trade war with China isn’t new by any stretch of the imagination and is not dissimilar to the threats that other tech giants like Amazon (AMZN), Alphabet (GOOG), or Facebook (FB) face every day. This is par for the course if you’re a dominant tech company, and Apple certainly is. I don’t want to ignore these potential negative catalysts, but I don’t want to overreact, either.\nKeep in mind also that Apple continues to move higher over time despite this bad news, which is what winning stocks do. The fact that it is shrugging off these huge potential negative catalysts reinforces the bullish stance I already had on the stock.\nI detailed my bullishness on the company’s revenue generation, margins, buybacks, valuation, and more in the prior piece, and nothing has changed there. So I don’t want to waste your time going through it again. However, my fundamental stance on Apple hasn’t changed in the past six weeks, and if anything, continued upward revisions in EPS estimates have strengthened the bull case.\nThe important thing is that shareholders must be aware of external threats, but also that we are seeing Apple get to the end of its very bullish consolidation pattern at the same time that it typically begins a pre-earnings run higher.\nThe bottom line is that I think Apple’s breakout is imminent, and that the pattern measures to $172 or so. This won’t happen overnight, but if you were looking to buy Apple, act quickly.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":31,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9909125629,"gmtCreate":1658836225961,"gmtModify":1676536214690,"author":{"id":"3577409082356068","authorId":"3577409082356068","name":"babiboo","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8be2f9f25874d7f974661428b042a2e7","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577409082356068","authorIdStr":"3577409082356068"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Yess","listText":"Yess","text":"Yess","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9909125629","repostId":"2254435878","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2254435878","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1658834275,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2254435878?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-07-26 19:17","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Raytheon Stock Falls 3.3% after Profit Tops Expectations but Sales Missed","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2254435878","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"Shares of Raytheon Technologies Corp. $(RTX)$ fell 3.3% in premarket trading Tuesday, after the aero","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Shares of Raytheon Technologies Corp. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/RTX\">$(RTX)$</a> fell 3.3% in premarket trading Tuesday, after the aerospace and defense company reported second-quarter profit that beat expectations but sales that came up short, while confirming the full-year outlook. <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/22db9eaab8b71cd6b43c539f431fb1d8\" tg-width=\"829\" tg-height=\"859\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Net income rose to $1.30 billion, or 88 cents a share, from $1.03 billion, or 68 cents a share, in the year-ago period. </p><p>Excluding nonrecurring items, adjusted earnings per share of $1.16 beat the FactSet consensus of $1.12. Sales grew 2.7% to $16.31 billion, below the FactSet consensus of $16.66 billion, as the company&#39;s Pratt &amp; Whitney business beat expectations while its Collins Aerospace Systems, Raytheon Intelligence &amp; Space and Raytheon Missiles &amp; Defense businesses missed. </p><p>The company affirmed its 2022 guidance ranges for adjusted EPS of $4.60 to $4.80 and for sales of $67.75 billion to $68.75 billion. </p><p>&#34;Looking ahead, while we expect the global supply chain environment, labor availability and inflation will remain challenging near term, we are actively engaged with our customers and suppliers to meet demand and remain cost competitive,&#34; said Chief Executive Greg Hayes. </p><p>The stock has rallied 9.9% year to date through Monday, while the S&amp;P 500  has dropped 16.8%.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Raytheon Stock Falls 3.3% after Profit Tops Expectations but Sales Missed</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nRaytheon Stock Falls 3.3% after Profit Tops Expectations but Sales Missed\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-07-26 19:17</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>Shares of Raytheon Technologies Corp. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/RTX\">$(RTX)$</a> fell 3.3% in premarket trading Tuesday, after the aerospace and defense company reported second-quarter profit that beat expectations but sales that came up short, while confirming the full-year outlook. <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/22db9eaab8b71cd6b43c539f431fb1d8\" tg-width=\"829\" tg-height=\"859\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Net income rose to $1.30 billion, or 88 cents a share, from $1.03 billion, or 68 cents a share, in the year-ago period. </p><p>Excluding nonrecurring items, adjusted earnings per share of $1.16 beat the FactSet consensus of $1.12. Sales grew 2.7% to $16.31 billion, below the FactSet consensus of $16.66 billion, as the company&#39;s Pratt &amp; Whitney business beat expectations while its Collins Aerospace Systems, Raytheon Intelligence &amp; Space and Raytheon Missiles &amp; Defense businesses missed. </p><p>The company affirmed its 2022 guidance ranges for adjusted EPS of $4.60 to $4.80 and for sales of $67.75 billion to $68.75 billion. </p><p>&#34;Looking ahead, while we expect the global supply chain environment, labor availability and inflation will remain challenging near term, we are actively engaged with our customers and suppliers to meet demand and remain cost competitive,&#34; said Chief Executive Greg Hayes. </p><p>The stock has rallied 9.9% year to date through Monday, while the S&amp;P 500  has dropped 16.8%.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"RTX":"雷神技术公司"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2254435878","content_text":"Shares of Raytheon Technologies Corp. $(RTX)$ fell 3.3% in premarket trading Tuesday, after the aerospace and defense company reported second-quarter profit that beat expectations but sales that came up short, while confirming the full-year outlook. Net income rose to $1.30 billion, or 88 cents a share, from $1.03 billion, or 68 cents a share, in the year-ago period. Excluding nonrecurring items, adjusted earnings per share of $1.16 beat the FactSet consensus of $1.12. Sales grew 2.7% to $16.31 billion, below the FactSet consensus of $16.66 billion, as the company's Pratt & Whitney business beat expectations while its Collins Aerospace Systems, Raytheon Intelligence & Space and Raytheon Missiles & Defense businesses missed. The company affirmed its 2022 guidance ranges for adjusted EPS of $4.60 to $4.80 and for sales of $67.75 billion to $68.75 billion. \"Looking ahead, while we expect the global supply chain environment, labor availability and inflation will remain challenging near term, we are actively engaged with our customers and suppliers to meet demand and remain cost competitive,\" said Chief Executive Greg Hayes. The stock has rallied 9.9% year to date through Monday, while the S&P 500  has dropped 16.8%.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":52,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9006362389,"gmtCreate":1641608312726,"gmtModify":1676533634485,"author":{"id":"3577409082356068","authorId":"3577409082356068","name":"babiboo","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8be2f9f25874d7f974661428b042a2e7","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577409082356068","authorIdStr":"3577409082356068"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ohnoo","listText":"Ohnoo","text":"Ohnoo","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":9,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9006362389","repostId":"2201424321","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2201424321","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1641597180,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2201424321?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-01-08 07:13","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Wall St posts declines for first week of 2022; Nasdaq has worst week since Feb","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2201424321","media":"Reuters","summary":"* U.S. nonfarm payrolls rise by 199,000 in December* GameStop jumps after report of foray into NFT, ","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>* U.S. nonfarm payrolls rise by 199,000 in December</p><p>* GameStop jumps after report of foray into NFT, crypto markets</p><p>* Indexes: Dow down 0.01%, S&amp;P 500 down 0.4%, Nasdaq down 1%</p><p>NEW YORK Jan 7 (Reuters) - Wall Street on Friday wrapped up the first week of the new year with daily and weekly losses as investors worried about looming U.S. interest-rate hikes and unfolding Omicron news.</p><p>The Nasdaq posted its biggest weekly percentage fall since February 2021 and led declines for the day in the major indexes. Stocks fell on Friday after the December U.S. jobs report missed expectations but was still seen as strong enough to keep the Federal Reserve&#39;s tightening path in place.</p><p>Friday&#39;s Labor Department data showed the U.S. jobs market was at or near maximum employment even though employment rose far less than expected in December, when there were worker shortages.</p><p>On Wednesday, minutes released of the Fed&#39;s Dec. 14-15 policy meeting showed officials at the U.S. central bank viewed the labor market as &#34;very tight,&#34; and signaled the Fed may have to raise rates sooner than expected.</p><p>&#34;The investor takeaway is that the labor market continues to be tight despite the headline miss,&#34; said Michael Arone, chief investment strategist at State Street Global Advisors in Boston.</p><p>&#34;Investors are concerned the Fed will be more aggressive than expected.&#34;</p><p>Consumer discretionary and and technology sectors led the way lower on the S&amp;P 500 on Friday. Big tech companies have benefited from low interest rates.</p><p>On the flip side, the S&amp;P 500 financials sector and banking index extended recent gains and reached record closing highs. The bank index rose 9.4% for the week, registering its biggest weekly percentage gain since November 2020.</p><p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 4.81 points, or 0.01%, to 36,231.66, the S&amp;P 500 lost 19.02 points, or 0.41%, to 4,677.03 and the Nasdaq Composite dropped 144.96 points, or 0.96%, to 14,935.90.</p><p>For the week, the Dow fell 0.3%, the S&amp;P 500 declined 1.9% and the Nasdaq dropped 4.5%.</p><p>Banks have risen with U.S. Treasury yields, with the U.S. benchmark 10-year yield soaring to a two-year high on Friday on the outlook for Fed rate hikes.</p><p>&#34;The sentiment has turned negative,&#34; said Jack Dollarhide, chief executive officer of Longbow Asset Management in Tulsa, Oklahoma. &#34;Right now the market is nervous and in the mood to sell at the first hint of bad news.&#34;</p><p>Rising cases on the Omicron variant of the coronavirus also caused investor jitters this week.</p><p>Investors have been rotating out technology-heavy growth shares and into more value-oriented shares, which they think may do better in a high interest-rate environment.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 value index added 1% this week, outperforming the S&amp;P 500 growth index which fell 4.5%, its biggest weekly percentage drop since October 2020.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 energy sector gained sharply for the week, rising 10.6% in its best week since November 2020.</p><p>&#34;Meme stock&#34; GameStop Corp jumped 7.3% after the video game retailer said it is launching a division to develop a marketplace for nonfungible tokens and establish cryptocurrency partnerships.</p><p>Advancing issues outnumbered declining ones on the NYSE by a 1.01-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 1.38-to-1 ratio favored decliners.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 posted 50 new 52-week highs and 1 new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 83 new highs and 262 new lows.</p><p>Volume on U.S. exchanges was 10.21 billion shares, compared with the roughly 10.4 billion average for the full session over the last 20 trading days.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Wall St posts declines for first week of 2022; Nasdaq has worst week since Feb</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWall St posts declines for first week of 2022; Nasdaq has worst week since Feb\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-01-08 07:13</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>* U.S. nonfarm payrolls rise by 199,000 in December</p><p>* GameStop jumps after report of foray into NFT, crypto markets</p><p>* Indexes: Dow down 0.01%, S&amp;P 500 down 0.4%, Nasdaq down 1%</p><p>NEW YORK Jan 7 (Reuters) - Wall Street on Friday wrapped up the first week of the new year with daily and weekly losses as investors worried about looming U.S. interest-rate hikes and unfolding Omicron news.</p><p>The Nasdaq posted its biggest weekly percentage fall since February 2021 and led declines for the day in the major indexes. Stocks fell on Friday after the December U.S. jobs report missed expectations but was still seen as strong enough to keep the Federal Reserve&#39;s tightening path in place.</p><p>Friday&#39;s Labor Department data showed the U.S. jobs market was at or near maximum employment even though employment rose far less than expected in December, when there were worker shortages.</p><p>On Wednesday, minutes released of the Fed&#39;s Dec. 14-15 policy meeting showed officials at the U.S. central bank viewed the labor market as &#34;very tight,&#34; and signaled the Fed may have to raise rates sooner than expected.</p><p>&#34;The investor takeaway is that the labor market continues to be tight despite the headline miss,&#34; said Michael Arone, chief investment strategist at State Street Global Advisors in Boston.</p><p>&#34;Investors are concerned the Fed will be more aggressive than expected.&#34;</p><p>Consumer discretionary and and technology sectors led the way lower on the S&amp;P 500 on Friday. Big tech companies have benefited from low interest rates.</p><p>On the flip side, the S&amp;P 500 financials sector and banking index extended recent gains and reached record closing highs. The bank index rose 9.4% for the week, registering its biggest weekly percentage gain since November 2020.</p><p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 4.81 points, or 0.01%, to 36,231.66, the S&amp;P 500 lost 19.02 points, or 0.41%, to 4,677.03 and the Nasdaq Composite dropped 144.96 points, or 0.96%, to 14,935.90.</p><p>For the week, the Dow fell 0.3%, the S&amp;P 500 declined 1.9% and the Nasdaq dropped 4.5%.</p><p>Banks have risen with U.S. Treasury yields, with the U.S. benchmark 10-year yield soaring to a two-year high on Friday on the outlook for Fed rate hikes.</p><p>&#34;The sentiment has turned negative,&#34; said Jack Dollarhide, chief executive officer of Longbow Asset Management in Tulsa, Oklahoma. &#34;Right now the market is nervous and in the mood to sell at the first hint of bad news.&#34;</p><p>Rising cases on the Omicron variant of the coronavirus also caused investor jitters this week.</p><p>Investors have been rotating out technology-heavy growth shares and into more value-oriented shares, which they think may do better in a high interest-rate environment.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 value index added 1% this week, outperforming the S&amp;P 500 growth index which fell 4.5%, its biggest weekly percentage drop since October 2020.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 energy sector gained sharply for the week, rising 10.6% in its best week since November 2020.</p><p>&#34;Meme stock&#34; GameStop Corp jumped 7.3% after the video game retailer said it is launching a division to develop a marketplace for nonfungible tokens and establish cryptocurrency partnerships.</p><p>Advancing issues outnumbered declining ones on the NYSE by a 1.01-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 1.38-to-1 ratio favored decliners.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 posted 50 new 52-week highs and 1 new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 83 new highs and 262 new lows.</p><p>Volume on U.S. exchanges was 10.21 billion shares, compared with the roughly 10.4 billion average for the full session over the last 20 trading days.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","GME":"游戏驿站"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2201424321","content_text":"* U.S. nonfarm payrolls rise by 199,000 in December* GameStop jumps after report of foray into NFT, crypto markets* Indexes: Dow down 0.01%, S&P 500 down 0.4%, Nasdaq down 1%NEW YORK Jan 7 (Reuters) - Wall Street on Friday wrapped up the first week of the new year with daily and weekly losses as investors worried about looming U.S. interest-rate hikes and unfolding Omicron news.The Nasdaq posted its biggest weekly percentage fall since February 2021 and led declines for the day in the major indexes. Stocks fell on Friday after the December U.S. jobs report missed expectations but was still seen as strong enough to keep the Federal Reserve's tightening path in place.Friday's Labor Department data showed the U.S. jobs market was at or near maximum employment even though employment rose far less than expected in December, when there were worker shortages.On Wednesday, minutes released of the Fed's Dec. 14-15 policy meeting showed officials at the U.S. central bank viewed the labor market as \"very tight,\" and signaled the Fed may have to raise rates sooner than expected.\"The investor takeaway is that the labor market continues to be tight despite the headline miss,\" said Michael Arone, chief investment strategist at State Street Global Advisors in Boston.\"Investors are concerned the Fed will be more aggressive than expected.\"Consumer discretionary and and technology sectors led the way lower on the S&P 500 on Friday. Big tech companies have benefited from low interest rates.On the flip side, the S&P 500 financials sector and banking index extended recent gains and reached record closing highs. The bank index rose 9.4% for the week, registering its biggest weekly percentage gain since November 2020.The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 4.81 points, or 0.01%, to 36,231.66, the S&P 500 lost 19.02 points, or 0.41%, to 4,677.03 and the Nasdaq Composite dropped 144.96 points, or 0.96%, to 14,935.90.For the week, the Dow fell 0.3%, the S&P 500 declined 1.9% and the Nasdaq dropped 4.5%.Banks have risen with U.S. Treasury yields, with the U.S. benchmark 10-year yield soaring to a two-year high on Friday on the outlook for Fed rate hikes.\"The sentiment has turned negative,\" said Jack Dollarhide, chief executive officer of Longbow Asset Management in Tulsa, Oklahoma. \"Right now the market is nervous and in the mood to sell at the first hint of bad news.\"Rising cases on the Omicron variant of the coronavirus also caused investor jitters this week.Investors have been rotating out technology-heavy growth shares and into more value-oriented shares, which they think may do better in a high interest-rate environment.The S&P 500 value index added 1% this week, outperforming the S&P 500 growth index which fell 4.5%, its biggest weekly percentage drop since October 2020.The S&P 500 energy sector gained sharply for the week, rising 10.6% in its best week since November 2020.\"Meme stock\" GameStop Corp jumped 7.3% after the video game retailer said it is launching a division to develop a marketplace for nonfungible tokens and establish cryptocurrency partnerships.Advancing issues outnumbered declining ones on the NYSE by a 1.01-to-1 ratio; on Nasdaq, a 1.38-to-1 ratio favored decliners.The S&P 500 posted 50 new 52-week highs and 1 new lows; the Nasdaq Composite recorded 83 new highs and 262 new lows.Volume on U.S. exchanges was 10.21 billion shares, compared with the roughly 10.4 billion average for the full session over the last 20 trading days.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":247,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9903756743,"gmtCreate":1659081914282,"gmtModify":1676536255399,"author":{"id":"3577409082356068","authorId":"3577409082356068","name":"babiboo","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8be2f9f25874d7f974661428b042a2e7","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577409082356068","authorIdStr":"3577409082356068"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hmmm","listText":"Hmmm","text":"Hmmm","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9903756743","repostId":"1114809450","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1114809450","pubTimestamp":1659108300,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1114809450?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-07-29 23:25","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Alibaba Vs. JD.Com: Let's Hear The Bears Out","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1114809450","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"SummaryI am a long-term Alibaba Bull, but here I will argue against my own bull thesis.My favorite C","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>Summary</b></p><ul><li>I am a long-term Alibaba Bull, but here I will argue against my own bull thesis.</li><li>My favorite Charles Munger quote is not to comment on a topic until I can argue against myself better than the people on the other side.</li><li>Following this wisdom, the focus here is to address some potential risks for Alibaba that are not often discussed.</li><li>And these risks are best illustrated by comparison and contrast against JD.com.</li><li>The goal is not to dismiss these risks (they are 100% valid), but to provide a full view so both bears and bulls can all make informed decisions.</li></ul><p><b>Thesis</b></p><p>My last comparison article on Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE:BABA,OTCPK:BABAF) and JD.com, Inc. (NASDAQ:JD) was co-produced with Sensor Unlimited and published back in May 2022. That article focused on the similarities and differences in their business fundamentals and the megatrend in the Asian-Pacific regions.</p><p>In this article, I want to compare them again, but from a completely different angle and for a completely different purpose. This time, I want to compare them to address many of the risks facing BABA. Some of these risks have been often mentioned by BABA bears, while some of them are less mentioned (like BABA’s profitability sustainability and platform role). All these risks are 100% valid to me. So, the point of this article is not to prove the bears to be wrong. To the contrary, their concerns are 100% valid to me. I am here to hear them out and provide my thoughts so both bulls and bears can all make informed decisions.</p><p>After all, the hallmark of a first-rate mind is the ability to hold conflicting views at the same time without losing the ability to act.</p><p>And we will start with the elephant in the room first – the risk in China.</p><p><b>Risk in China</b></p><p>The implied argument here is that the BABA thesis does not depend much on its business fundamentals. Instead, the Chinese government (or the CCP, or the VIE structure, et al) is a central part (or even all) of the thesis.</p><p>As just mentioned, it is a 100% valid argument to me, and I am not here to dismiss it or prove it wrong. I am here to provide my perspective for a full view. And I invite BABA investors or potential BABA investors to consider the following aspects.</p><p>First, I feel the argument is border-lining a political or ideological discussion. Not say political or ideological considerations are not important in investment decisions – to the contrary, they are very important. However, they are difficult to quantify. To me, investing is pretty much all about PRICING risks. It is hard to put a price tag on risks that you cannot quantify. As such, I won’t dwell more on this issue here myself. I recommend Ray Dalio’s recent book entitled “Principles for Dealing with the Changing World Order” for readers who are interested in his view on politics and ideologies. I feel he has deeper insights about China than most Chinese themselves. And, of course, he understands the West deeper than most westerners too. A few quotes from his book are provided below:</p><blockquote><ul><li><i>“I urge those of you who have not spent considerable time in China to look past the caricatured pictures that are often painted by biased parties and rid yourself of any stereotypes you might have that are based on what you thought you knew about the old “communist China” - because they are wrong.</i></li><li><i>“As an aside, I think the widespread medium distortions and the blind and the near-violent loyalties that stand in the way of the thoughtful exploration of our different perspectives are a frightening sign of our times.”</i></li></ul></blockquote><p>Second, this is where JD enters the picture. If the risk is valid, then it should apply to all other major Chinese firms too, such as BABA’s close peer JD. After all, they all operate in the same country and are governed by the same laws (or lack of laws, as many have bears argued). If BABA’s business fundamentals don’t mean much to the investment thesis, then neither should JD’s.</p><p>However, reality does not seem to confirm. The following chart shows a simple counterexample in terms of stock price actions. As you can see from the below chart, over the past year, JD suffered a total loss of around 4%, totally within the range of random fluctuations. On the other hand, BABA&#39;s stock price suffered a total loss of more than 46% in the past years.</p><p>And as you already know, JD is still trading at a healthy (or even lofty) valuation with a P/E around 35x. This leads us to the next risk associated with BABA, its profitability. And we will discuss this next.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/32d445f99fbb8cf67372cf8ba8707ca8\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"434\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>Seeking Alpha</p><p><b>But BABA also has higher margins</b></p><p>The next bearish argument is that due to the regulatory changes, BABA’s good old days are gone and its profitability couldn&#39;t sustain in the future. Therefore, its valuation should be discounted correspondingly.</p><p>A very valid argument again. And moreover, this argument is indeed supported by data, as you can see from the top panel in the next chart. To net profit margin as an example, BABA’s margin has been quite stable and fluctuated in a narrow range between about 20% to 30% in the past before the tech crackdown started in 2020. Then it declined all the way to the current level of 6.4%.</p><p>But as advised by Charlie Munger, being smart is all about actively looking for disconfirming evidence, not confirming evidence. And JD’s margin, shown in the bottom panel of this chart, is an easy disconfirming evince to find. You can see JD’s net margin has declined (and in a more dramatic fashion) since 2021, it is currently in the negative (-1%), and its long-term average is nowhere near BABA’s. In terms of long-term averages, BABA’s margin of 23% is 13x higher than JD’s 1.7%. Even when we compared BABA’s current margin of 6.4% against JD’s long-term average (kind of unfair), BABA is still ahead by about 3.8x.</p><p>And this leads us yet to the next bears’ argument associated with BABA, which goes more or less like this: margins (or profitability in general) are not the whole story, and their business models are not entirely comparable. And we will address this next.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c68b1d15c317dd7a3a7c0e642dbbbda1\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"448\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>Seeking Alpha</p><p><b>Business model comparison</b></p><p>A few key differences here. First, even though BABA is better known and bigger than JD in market-cap (by almost 3x), JD’s revenues are actually larger than BABA. JD is China&#39;s largest direct retailer in terms of revenue. Second, JD relies almost exclusively on a single source of revenue while BABA is more diversified. JD&#39;s retail business represents 94% of its total sales and almost 100% of its total profits. BABA&#39;s core eCommerce operation “only” accounts for about 87% of its total sales, with the rest coming from other segments such as its cloud service.</p><p>Now, even within the e-commerce segment, they are very different. JD’s main operation is its first-party marketplace. It sells its own goods and keeps its own inventories. In contrast, BABA’s main role is to provide a platform and act as a third party. For reference, Amazon (AMZN) is more of a hybrid. Its Third-Party Sales and First-Party Sales are about an even split in recent years.</p><p>The focus of this article is not trying to argue which model (first-party, third-party, or a hybrid) is better, although that would be a fascinating topic for another article. The point is to acknowledge the bears’ point that net profit margin is not the entire picture because of the differences in business fundamentals</p><p>Or to put it differently, margins do not entirely determine profitability. Intuitively, the reasons are summarized by the following simple example used in one of our earlier articles:</p><blockquote><i>If you buy an orange today for $1 and sell it tomorrow for $1.01, your margin is a meager 1% but your ROIC (which is your true profitability) would be an astronomical 365%. There are three knobs that management can turn to drive up profitability: profit margin (“PM”), asset turnover ratio (“ATR”), and leverage. And PM is only one of the 3 knobs.</i></blockquote><p>And different business models lead to different ATR, as you can clearly see from the following chart. Because of its third-party dominant model, BABA’s ATR has been on average about 0.45x in the past five years (although note that the trend has been improving). In contrast, JD’s ATR is much higher. It has fluctuated in a range from 1.97x to about 2.46x in the past five years, with an average of 2.23x. So, because of its first-party dominant model, JD can operate its asset much more effectively than BABA, on average by about a factor of almost 5x.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/75deb5d294785307e58c8b1e54eb6bc0\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"449\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>Seeking Alpha</p><p><b>True profitability comparison</b></p><p>The next chart compares their return on capital employed (“ROCE”), a comprehensive measure of profitability combining the effects of all three knobs as detailed in my free blog article here. As seen, their current ROCE is on the same order of magnitude – both are at terrific levels. They are not different by 3.8x as net margin would suggest or by 5x as asset utilization would. BABA’s ROCE currently stands at about 95%, and JD at about 85%. Both JD and BABA’s ROCEs have been in decline since 2020 while BABA’s decline is more dramatic.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1720d0a06becf9ad3bb5dfa46b2ff913\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"336\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>Author</p><p><b>Yet BABA P/E is less than ½ of JD</b></p><p>The comparable ROCE now leads me to the following valuation comparison. As you can see, despite very comparable ROCE (BABA is actually higher), BABA&#39;s valuation is less than ½ of JD by most metrics. Let me cite a few examples. BABA’s FY1 P/E of 13.8x is almost only 1/3 of JD’s 35x. Its FY2 P/E of 11.5x is less than 1/2 of JD’s 23.8x.</p><p>And next, we will see that the valuation discount is a bit less than what&#39;s on the surface because of the differences in their balance sheets.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f8e55787bae44c98c1e22fd8103edec6\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"566\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>Seeking Alpha</p><p><b>Balance sheet and adjusted P/E</b></p><p>Currently, BABA has about $72 billion of cash on its ledger and JD about $28 billion, translating into $26.8 per share for BABA and about $18.6 dollars per share for JD. Both of them also have some debt but the debt is both lower than the cash position. As a result, both carry a net cash position (a quite sizable one) on their ledger. The net cash position for BABA is about $44.5 billion and for JD about $8.3 billion.</p><p>In other words, at their current market cap ($274 billion for BABA and $96 billion for JD), about 16% of BABA’s market cap is just its cash and the percentage is about 20.8% for JD.</p><p>When we subtract the cash out of the stock price, their Pes would both become lower. For BABA, the FY1 P/E would become only 11.6x after adjusting for its cash position. And for JD, the FY1 P/E would become 27.7x, still more than 2x above BABA.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bec38b2bfebedfcb0394b6a639e2b5b6\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"300\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>Seeking Alpha</p><p><b>Final thoughts and risks</b></p><p>Even though I feel the market has gone too far in the fear direction for BABA (or not enough for JD), I think the bearish arguments are 100% valid. The common bearish concerns concerning BABA such as risk in China, profitability sustainability, and business model, are 100% valid. And I hope the comparison and contrast against its close peer JD better accentuate these concerns so we can all make better investment decisions.</p><p>Finally, besides the above risks mentioned. There are also unfolding macroscopic risks that could impact both BABA and JD. BABA has more exposure overseas and will be more sensitive to global geopolitics such as the Russian/Ukraine situation. The upside is that it’s better poised to tap into the global eCommerce movement, especially in the Asian-Pacific region. There are also macroeconomic headwinds specific to China, which would impact both BABA and JD. In the short term, China faces the challenge of balancing COVID control and economic growth. The World Bank projects its GDP growth to slow in 2022 to 4.3 percent (0.8% lower than China’s own economic update).</p><p>At the same time, China’s housing market is seeing weakening demand and dealing with sizable debt issues. A JPMorgan report estimated that the housing sector has been contributing up to 25% of its GDP when related sectors are considered in the past few years. But demand for housing is predicted to fall 47% by 2030. Such a large decline will create ripple effects throughout its entire economy.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Alibaba Vs. JD.Com: Let's Hear The Bears Out</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAlibaba Vs. JD.Com: Let's Hear The Bears Out\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-07-29 23:25 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4526927-alibaba-vs-jdcom-lets-hear-the-bears-out?source=content_type%3Aall%7Cfirst_level_url%3Aportfolio%7Csection%3Aportfolio_content_unit%7Csection_asset%3Alatest%7Cline%3A41><strong>Seeking Alpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>SummaryI am a long-term Alibaba Bull, but here I will argue against my own bull thesis.My favorite Charles Munger quote is not to comment on a topic until I can argue against myself better than the ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4526927-alibaba-vs-jdcom-lets-hear-the-bears-out?source=content_type%3Aall%7Cfirst_level_url%3Aportfolio%7Csection%3Aportfolio_content_unit%7Csection_asset%3Alatest%7Cline%3A41\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BABA":"阿里巴巴","JD":"京东","09618":"京东集团-SW","09988":"阿里巴巴-W"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4526927-alibaba-vs-jdcom-lets-hear-the-bears-out?source=content_type%3Aall%7Cfirst_level_url%3Aportfolio%7Csection%3Aportfolio_content_unit%7Csection_asset%3Alatest%7Cline%3A41","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1114809450","content_text":"SummaryI am a long-term Alibaba Bull, but here I will argue against my own bull thesis.My favorite Charles Munger quote is not to comment on a topic until I can argue against myself better than the people on the other side.Following this wisdom, the focus here is to address some potential risks for Alibaba that are not often discussed.And these risks are best illustrated by comparison and contrast against JD.com.The goal is not to dismiss these risks (they are 100% valid), but to provide a full view so both bears and bulls can all make informed decisions.ThesisMy last comparison article on Alibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE:BABA,OTCPK:BABAF) and JD.com, Inc. (NASDAQ:JD) was co-produced with Sensor Unlimited and published back in May 2022. That article focused on the similarities and differences in their business fundamentals and the megatrend in the Asian-Pacific regions.In this article, I want to compare them again, but from a completely different angle and for a completely different purpose. This time, I want to compare them to address many of the risks facing BABA. Some of these risks have been often mentioned by BABA bears, while some of them are less mentioned (like BABA’s profitability sustainability and platform role). All these risks are 100% valid to me. So, the point of this article is not to prove the bears to be wrong. To the contrary, their concerns are 100% valid to me. I am here to hear them out and provide my thoughts so both bulls and bears can all make informed decisions.After all, the hallmark of a first-rate mind is the ability to hold conflicting views at the same time without losing the ability to act.And we will start with the elephant in the room first – the risk in China.Risk in ChinaThe implied argument here is that the BABA thesis does not depend much on its business fundamentals. Instead, the Chinese government (or the CCP, or the VIE structure, et al) is a central part (or even all) of the thesis.As just mentioned, it is a 100% valid argument to me, and I am not here to dismiss it or prove it wrong. I am here to provide my perspective for a full view. And I invite BABA investors or potential BABA investors to consider the following aspects.First, I feel the argument is border-lining a political or ideological discussion. Not say political or ideological considerations are not important in investment decisions – to the contrary, they are very important. However, they are difficult to quantify. To me, investing is pretty much all about PRICING risks. It is hard to put a price tag on risks that you cannot quantify. As such, I won’t dwell more on this issue here myself. I recommend Ray Dalio’s recent book entitled “Principles for Dealing with the Changing World Order” for readers who are interested in his view on politics and ideologies. I feel he has deeper insights about China than most Chinese themselves. And, of course, he understands the West deeper than most westerners too. A few quotes from his book are provided below:“I urge those of you who have not spent considerable time in China to look past the caricatured pictures that are often painted by biased parties and rid yourself of any stereotypes you might have that are based on what you thought you knew about the old “communist China” - because they are wrong.“As an aside, I think the widespread medium distortions and the blind and the near-violent loyalties that stand in the way of the thoughtful exploration of our different perspectives are a frightening sign of our times.”Second, this is where JD enters the picture. If the risk is valid, then it should apply to all other major Chinese firms too, such as BABA’s close peer JD. After all, they all operate in the same country and are governed by the same laws (or lack of laws, as many have bears argued). If BABA’s business fundamentals don’t mean much to the investment thesis, then neither should JD’s.However, reality does not seem to confirm. The following chart shows a simple counterexample in terms of stock price actions. As you can see from the below chart, over the past year, JD suffered a total loss of around 4%, totally within the range of random fluctuations. On the other hand, BABA's stock price suffered a total loss of more than 46% in the past years.And as you already know, JD is still trading at a healthy (or even lofty) valuation with a P/E around 35x. This leads us to the next risk associated with BABA, its profitability. And we will discuss this next.Seeking AlphaBut BABA also has higher marginsThe next bearish argument is that due to the regulatory changes, BABA’s good old days are gone and its profitability couldn't sustain in the future. Therefore, its valuation should be discounted correspondingly.A very valid argument again. And moreover, this argument is indeed supported by data, as you can see from the top panel in the next chart. To net profit margin as an example, BABA’s margin has been quite stable and fluctuated in a narrow range between about 20% to 30% in the past before the tech crackdown started in 2020. Then it declined all the way to the current level of 6.4%.But as advised by Charlie Munger, being smart is all about actively looking for disconfirming evidence, not confirming evidence. And JD’s margin, shown in the bottom panel of this chart, is an easy disconfirming evince to find. You can see JD’s net margin has declined (and in a more dramatic fashion) since 2021, it is currently in the negative (-1%), and its long-term average is nowhere near BABA’s. In terms of long-term averages, BABA’s margin of 23% is 13x higher than JD’s 1.7%. Even when we compared BABA’s current margin of 6.4% against JD’s long-term average (kind of unfair), BABA is still ahead by about 3.8x.And this leads us yet to the next bears’ argument associated with BABA, which goes more or less like this: margins (or profitability in general) are not the whole story, and their business models are not entirely comparable. And we will address this next.Seeking AlphaBusiness model comparisonA few key differences here. First, even though BABA is better known and bigger than JD in market-cap (by almost 3x), JD’s revenues are actually larger than BABA. JD is China's largest direct retailer in terms of revenue. Second, JD relies almost exclusively on a single source of revenue while BABA is more diversified. JD's retail business represents 94% of its total sales and almost 100% of its total profits. BABA's core eCommerce operation “only” accounts for about 87% of its total sales, with the rest coming from other segments such as its cloud service.Now, even within the e-commerce segment, they are very different. JD’s main operation is its first-party marketplace. It sells its own goods and keeps its own inventories. In contrast, BABA’s main role is to provide a platform and act as a third party. For reference, Amazon (AMZN) is more of a hybrid. Its Third-Party Sales and First-Party Sales are about an even split in recent years.The focus of this article is not trying to argue which model (first-party, third-party, or a hybrid) is better, although that would be a fascinating topic for another article. The point is to acknowledge the bears’ point that net profit margin is not the entire picture because of the differences in business fundamentalsOr to put it differently, margins do not entirely determine profitability. Intuitively, the reasons are summarized by the following simple example used in one of our earlier articles:If you buy an orange today for $1 and sell it tomorrow for $1.01, your margin is a meager 1% but your ROIC (which is your true profitability) would be an astronomical 365%. There are three knobs that management can turn to drive up profitability: profit margin (“PM”), asset turnover ratio (“ATR”), and leverage. And PM is only one of the 3 knobs.And different business models lead to different ATR, as you can clearly see from the following chart. Because of its third-party dominant model, BABA’s ATR has been on average about 0.45x in the past five years (although note that the trend has been improving). In contrast, JD’s ATR is much higher. It has fluctuated in a range from 1.97x to about 2.46x in the past five years, with an average of 2.23x. So, because of its first-party dominant model, JD can operate its asset much more effectively than BABA, on average by about a factor of almost 5x.Seeking AlphaTrue profitability comparisonThe next chart compares their return on capital employed (“ROCE”), a comprehensive measure of profitability combining the effects of all three knobs as detailed in my free blog article here. As seen, their current ROCE is on the same order of magnitude – both are at terrific levels. They are not different by 3.8x as net margin would suggest or by 5x as asset utilization would. BABA’s ROCE currently stands at about 95%, and JD at about 85%. Both JD and BABA’s ROCEs have been in decline since 2020 while BABA’s decline is more dramatic.AuthorYet BABA P/E is less than ½ of JDThe comparable ROCE now leads me to the following valuation comparison. As you can see, despite very comparable ROCE (BABA is actually higher), BABA's valuation is less than ½ of JD by most metrics. Let me cite a few examples. BABA’s FY1 P/E of 13.8x is almost only 1/3 of JD’s 35x. Its FY2 P/E of 11.5x is less than 1/2 of JD’s 23.8x.And next, we will see that the valuation discount is a bit less than what's on the surface because of the differences in their balance sheets.Seeking AlphaBalance sheet and adjusted P/ECurrently, BABA has about $72 billion of cash on its ledger and JD about $28 billion, translating into $26.8 per share for BABA and about $18.6 dollars per share for JD. Both of them also have some debt but the debt is both lower than the cash position. As a result, both carry a net cash position (a quite sizable one) on their ledger. The net cash position for BABA is about $44.5 billion and for JD about $8.3 billion.In other words, at their current market cap ($274 billion for BABA and $96 billion for JD), about 16% of BABA’s market cap is just its cash and the percentage is about 20.8% for JD.When we subtract the cash out of the stock price, their Pes would both become lower. For BABA, the FY1 P/E would become only 11.6x after adjusting for its cash position. And for JD, the FY1 P/E would become 27.7x, still more than 2x above BABA.Seeking AlphaFinal thoughts and risksEven though I feel the market has gone too far in the fear direction for BABA (or not enough for JD), I think the bearish arguments are 100% valid. The common bearish concerns concerning BABA such as risk in China, profitability sustainability, and business model, are 100% valid. And I hope the comparison and contrast against its close peer JD better accentuate these concerns so we can all make better investment decisions.Finally, besides the above risks mentioned. There are also unfolding macroscopic risks that could impact both BABA and JD. BABA has more exposure overseas and will be more sensitive to global geopolitics such as the Russian/Ukraine situation. The upside is that it’s better poised to tap into the global eCommerce movement, especially in the Asian-Pacific region. There are also macroeconomic headwinds specific to China, which would impact both BABA and JD. In the short term, China faces the challenge of balancing COVID control and economic growth. The World Bank projects its GDP growth to slow in 2022 to 4.3 percent (0.8% lower than China’s own economic update).At the same time, China’s housing market is seeing weakening demand and dealing with sizable debt issues. A JPMorgan report estimated that the housing sector has been contributing up to 25% of its GDP when related sectors are considered in the past few years. But demand for housing is predicted to fall 47% by 2030. Such a large decline will create ripple effects throughout its entire economy.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":66,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9014501681,"gmtCreate":1649678493898,"gmtModify":1676534549311,"author":{"id":"3577409082356068","authorId":"3577409082356068","name":"babiboo","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8be2f9f25874d7f974661428b042a2e7","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577409082356068","authorIdStr":"3577409082356068"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hmmm","listText":"Hmmm","text":"Hmmm","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9014501681","repostId":"1185345155","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1185345155","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1649675066,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1185345155?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-04-11 19:04","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Chinese Game ADRs Surged in Premarket Trading","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1185345155","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Chinese game ADRs surged in premarket trading, with Bilibili rising over 9% and NetEase rising over ","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Chinese game ADRs surged in premarket trading, with Bilibili rising over 9% and NetEase rising over 7%.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0e99c25b9584dd03de25fdcc9f4780aa\" tg-width=\"863\" tg-height=\"667\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1108c6e02d7c95b6a5767ae7aaeaa2bb\" tg-width=\"854\" tg-height=\"672\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Chinese Game ADRs Surged in Premarket Trading</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nChinese Game ADRs Surged in Premarket Trading\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-04-11 19:04</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>Chinese game ADRs surged in premarket trading, with Bilibili rising over 9% and NetEase rising over 7%.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0e99c25b9584dd03de25fdcc9f4780aa\" tg-width=\"863\" tg-height=\"667\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1108c6e02d7c95b6a5767ae7aaeaa2bb\" tg-width=\"854\" tg-height=\"672\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NTES":"网易","BILI":"哔哩哔哩"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1185345155","content_text":"Chinese game ADRs surged in premarket trading, with Bilibili rising over 9% and NetEase rising over 7%.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":108,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":810294831,"gmtCreate":1629978844923,"gmtModify":1676530190165,"author":{"id":"3577409082356068","authorId":"3577409082356068","name":"babiboo","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8be2f9f25874d7f974661428b042a2e7","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577409082356068","authorIdStr":"3577409082356068"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Qqqq","listText":"Qqqq","text":"Qqqq","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/810294831","repostId":"1177725104","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1177725104","pubTimestamp":1629977782,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1177725104?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-08-26 19:36","market":"us","language":"en","title":"VOO Vs QQQ: Which ETF Is The Better Buy?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1177725104","media":"seekingalpha","summary":"Summary\n\nQQQ has out-performed VOO both since inception and over the past decade, making some invest","content":"<p><b>Summary</b></p>\n<ul>\n <li>QQQ has out-performed VOO both since inception and over the past decade, making some investors question why VOO is so much more popular among index investors.</li>\n <li>As the market keeps notching all time highs, it's informative to see how these two ETFs performed for investors who bought them at previous market peaks that preceded major crashes.</li>\n <li>The stocks held in QQQ that are excluded by VOO make up only 7% of the total value of QQQ, but each stock in QQQ has more impact.</li>\n <li>Deciding which ETF makes the better investment now requires taking a close look at the larger cap stocks held in VOO that are not part of QQQ.</li>\n</ul>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/be2d8be5dfceb82910788aa56be0e542\" tg-width=\"768\" tg-height=\"512\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>syahrir maulana/iStock via Getty Images</span></p>\n<p>When given the advice to invest in a \"broad stock market index\" many people immediately think that means they should buy an ETF that follows the S&amp;P 500 like the Vanguard S&amp;P 500 ETF(NYSEARCA:VOO). After all, Warren Buffett is famous for&nbsp;telling his stockholders, \"My regular recommendation has been a low-cost S&amp;P 500 index fund.\" He put his money where his mouth was, too, when he made a&nbsp;million-dollar bet&nbsp;with hedge fund managers that, over 10 years, he could beat their results with an S&amp;P 500 index fund--which he did.</p>\n<p>But when you tune into your favorite financial channel, or check the front page of any investing site, including this one, the S&amp;P 500 index is only one of the three major indexes that are always reported and give a minute by minute reading of the state of the market as a whole. The other two major indexes are the Nasdaq, which you can invest invia QQQ andthe Dow.</p>\n<p>The Dow is far from being a \"broad market index\" as it only holds 30 stocks. Most knowledgeable investors regard it as a relic of a simpler past that is reported only because of its historical importance. Though I have made a case that it is a pretty good proxy for the value and income segments of the market as a whole&nbsp;in a previous article, I would not recommend that an investor looking to buy a broad market index invest in a Dow ETF.</p>\n<p>But what about the Nasdaq, which investors usually invest in via the Invesco QQQ Trust(NASDAQ:QQQ)? The Nasdaq is also a broad market index and one that has been outperforming the S&amp;P 500 index dramatically over the past decade, as you can see in the chart below.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/aeab4a032f098cc8859aef4767e4726c\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"222\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Source:Seeking Alpha</span></p>\n<p>Though older investors will remember the Nasdaq's dramatic fall at the turn of this century, its dramatic rise before that collapse was strong enough that even with that collapse that it still equaled or outperformed the S&amp;P 500 index at any time since its inception in 1971.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f2c417558924a2cec274aa2bfc79cd73\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"335\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Source: Yahoo Finance</span></p>\n<p>Thoughwe are told not to chase performance, it's hard to argue with that kind of out-performance, especially when it rewarded investors so well. At least those who bought and held for the long-term, which is what we are also told we should do.</p>\n<p>Looking at these charts you have to ask yourself why all the academics and most investment advisors continue to recommend that index-loving investors stick with low cost indexes that follow the S&amp;P 500, rather than one that follows the Nasdaq. That is a question I have been asking myself, of late, too.</p>\n<p><b>The ETFs that Track The S&amp;P 500 and Nasdaq</b></p>\n<p>You can't buy any of these indexes directly, you have to invest in a fund or ETF that tracks that index. The largest ETF that tracks the S&amp;P 500 is the Vanguard S&amp;P 500 ETF which has 243.7 billion dollars of assets under management. At first glance, this makes it sound like VOO is smaller than the SPDR S&amp;P 500 ETF Trust(NYSEARCA:SPY), which also tracks the S&amp;P 500 index and holds&nbsp;397.27&nbsp;billion dollars worth of assets. But VOO, it turns out, is actually just a share class of a Vanguard mutual fund, The Vanguard 500 Index Fund(VFIAX). The total assets of this Vanguard fund and ETF combination are a whopping 777.3 billion dollars. This is not as surprising when you remember that the Vanguard 500 Index Fund was the very first index tracking fund and has been gathering assets since it started trading in 1976.</p>\n<p>The most common way to invest in the Nasdaq is via the Invesco QQQ Trust. Unlike VOO which invests in all the stocks in the S&amp;P 500 index, QQQ invests only in the Nasdaq index's top 100 non-financial stocks, ignoring most of the other 3,000+ stocks in the full Nasdaq index. You can read more on the details about how QQQ works in my previous article which you can findhere.</p>\n<p>In the rest of this article, I am going to try to answer some of the questions you should be asking yourself in order to decide whether VOO or QQQ would be a better investment for you right now. Historical returns are wonderful, but only if you could go back in time to do your investing. Since Tesla has not yet come up with a working time machine, we have to think critically about those past returns in order to decide if there is a good chance they will continue to repeat the same patterns.</p>\n<p><b>How Did Investors in These ETFs Do Investing at Previous Peaks?The Dot.com Peak</b></p>\n<p>Performance can be very different from what you see on graphs like those I showed you above depending on when your investment was made. Most working people scale into an investment, a bit every paycheck or two, which makes the returns shown on any chart with an arbitrary starting point misleading. Your own results can only be determined by putting your portfolio into a spreadsheet or other software tool.</p>\n<p>But given that we are currently in a situation where both indexes are at all-time highs, many investors, including highly sophisticated professionals far more knowledgeable than I am, are holding their breaths waiting for the next big correction. Some are hoping that it<i>is</i>a correction and not a full fledged crash. So the obvious question to ask, when considering these two ETFs is what has been the experience of investors who bought into them at previous market peaks that were followed by serious downturns?</p>\n<p>QQQ started trading in 1999. But the VOO ETF share class of Vanguard's 500 Index Fund did not begin trading until September of 2010, which is well after the two major market crashes that have occurred in the past two decades. Therefore, I am going to use the investors share class of the Vanguard 500 Index Fund(VFINX), which is just another share class of VOO, but was trading throughout the 1990s as a comparison to QQQ.</p>\n<p><b>Total Return of QQQ and VFINX Since Dot.com Peak</b></p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4c7d538410d7fa5e570ed0964da60bc1\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"222\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Source:Seeking Alpha</span></p>\n<p>As you can see, investors who bought into QQQ at the top of the Dot.com boom in 2000 have seriously under-performed those who bought the Vanguard 500 Index Fund at the same time. It took a very long 14 years for those QQQ investors to get back their original investment. That is a long, long time to hold any investment and it is likely most investors who did buy QQQ at its peak ended up taking heavy losses and moving on. Even now, the return of those who invested in QQQ at that peak and held still lags that of the S&amp;P 500 fund. This explains pretty well why all those advisors, and Mr. Buffett, choose the S&amp;P 500 over QQQ.</p>\n<p><b>The Financial Crisis</b></p>\n<p>From the above chart we see that the S&amp;P 500 index fund dropped more in 2008 than did QQQ. This should be no surprise when you remember that QQQ excludes the financial stocks listed in the Nasdaq index and that crash was caused by a financial crisis.</p>\n<p>So what happened to investors who invested in QQQ and VOO at the market peak that occurred before the 2008 Financial Crisis? (We are still looking at the mutual fund version of VOO here as VOO only started trading in 2010.)</p>\n<p><b>Total Return of QQQ and VFINX Since the Pre-Financial Crisis Peak</b></p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/40a06180fed25107702b5c15094730e2\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"222\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Source:Seeking Alpha</span></p>\n<p>Those investors made out like bandits. Those who invested in QQQ in 2008 came out way ahead.</p>\n<p><b>The COVID-19 Flash Crash</b></p>\n<p>Finally, let's look at what would happen if you invested in QQQ or VOO at the market peak that preceded last year's Covid-19 Flash Crash.</p>\n<p><b>Total Return of QQQ and VOO Since the Pre-COVID-19 Peak</b></p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cf3f4bbcc27c3523dba2a01641207118\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"222\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Source:Seeking Alpha</span></p>\n<p>Here again we see that VOO dipped further and recovered more slowly than did QQQ during the COVID-19 crash. Clearly something had changed between the crash in 2000 and subsequent market crashes. To get a better idea of what explains this change we need to look more closely at the actual holdings of these two ETFs.</p>\n<p><b>The Real Differences Between These Two ETFs</b></p>\n<p>The most significant difference between the holdings of the two ETFs, beyond the fact that they track different indexes is that there are five times as many stocks in VOO. This is not quite as big a deal as it might sound. That's because both of these ETFs are Market Cap Weighted in a market that has seen the emergence of a small handful of super-companies, the Mega Cap stocks, with market caps far huger than that of most other companies worldwide.</p>\n<p>The top 10 stocks in VOO make up 28.60% of its entire value. The top 10 stocks in QQQ make up 52.82% of its value. (Data as of July 31, 2021).</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a41db4dde955c22625faa95ecd05ad20\" tg-width=\"613\" tg-height=\"307\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Source:Seeking AlphaandVanguard.com</span></p>\n<p>As you can see those top 10 stocks in both ETFs are almost identical. Of those top 10 stocks, only Berkshire Hathaway(NYSE:BRK.A)is completely missing from QQQ. While PayPal(NASDAQ:PYPL)and Adobe(NASDAQ:ADBE)appear in QQQ's top 10 and not in VOO's, they are both still found just a few positions lower in VOO's list of holdings.</p>\n<p>It's also worth pointing out that while most people think of QQQ as being a tech ETF, and attribute its out-performance over the past decade to it being heavy in tech stocks, it also holds quite a few stocks from non-tech sectors, too.</p>\n<p><b>QQQ Holdings by Sector</b></p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/108838a0f69e47659898bc1507eb9c87\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"170\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Source:Seeking Alpha</span></p>\n<p>You must keep in mind that the only factor that unites all the stocks in QQQ is that they all are listed on the Nasdaq instead of the NYSE or some other exchange. Since the Nasdaq is a younger index, the Nasdaq by definition excludes the stocks of the many long-established major U.S. companies that have been trading uninterrupted on the NYSE since before 1971. Until the last decade, listing a new stock on the Nasdaq exchange did not have the prestige that listing on the NYSE did, and it was cheaper to list a stock on it, too, so the Nasdaq got the reputation of being the place to find start ups, even though by now some of those start ups have become the FAANGM behemoths that now dominate both QQQ and VOO.</p>\n<p><b>VOO Holds Only Profitable Companies</b></p>\n<p>Another major difference between the two indexes is that an S&amp;P committee curates the holdings of the 500 index and hence of VOO. It only selects from those companies that can show two sequential quarters of profits. There is no curation involved in selecting the holdings of QQQ. QQQ simply selects the top 100 stocks weighted by market cap present in the Nasdaq index. Thus there is no requirement that the stocks in QQQ, be profitable. This has allowed growth stocks like Amazon and Tesla that go for years or even decades without reporting any significant profits to play a huge role in QQQ's out-performance.</p>\n<p>Though the collapse of QQQ in 2000 had a lot to do with how many companies in that index were earning eyeballs rather than dollars. The top stocks that make up slightly more than half of QQQ's value today are profitable and of far higher quality than the Dot-com darlings that dominated QQQ in 2000.</p>\n<p>For today's investor, the difference between the two indexes is not so much quality, but that smaller number of stocks in QQQ give each stock held more impact. You end up with twice as much of the stocks held by both ETFs when you buy QQQ.</p>\n<p><b>What Stocks Are in QQQ that Aren't in VOO?</b></p>\n<p>Using a little spreadsheet magic, I matched the stock holdings of QQQ and VOO and came up with the list of the stocks that are in QQQ but<i>not</i>in VOO. Those stocks turn out to make up only 7.35% of the total value of QQQ.</p>\n<p>This analysis is based on the stock weightings reported as of June 30, 2021, which were the ones available last week when I did it. The actual list of stocks held by the two ETFs have not changed since then, though the percentages might be very slightly different now than a month ago.</p>\n<p><b>Stocks Held by QQQ But Not By VOO as of June 30, 2021</b></p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1126fe5034e6ad9e0c19930345dab368\" tg-width=\"519\" tg-height=\"485\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Source: List of All Portfolio Holdings downloaded fromInvescoand Vanguard and Analyzed by the Author</span></p>\n<p>The first thing that leaps out from this list is how small an impact most of these stocks have on the total value of QQQ. Only Moderna(NASDAQ:MRNA)makes up more than 1% of the value of the ETF. There is almost 100 times more Apple(NASDAQ:AAPL)in QQQ than there is Sirius XM(NASDAQ:SIRI).</p>\n<p>You can also see that while these stocks skew heavily towards tech and communications, Moderna, which is a health care stock is by far the most important. Most of these are recently listed companies that have not yet made a profit, but have attracted lots of growth investors. Remember there are another 3,400 or so stocks in the Nasdaq that are not in QQQ. It represents only the Nasdaq stocks that have attracted the most investors.</p>\n<p><b>What is in VOO that is Not in QQQ?</b></p>\n<p>Obviously, since there are 400 more stocks in the S&amp;P 500 than in the Nasdaq 100. There are far too many stocks excluded from QQQ for us to list them all here. But given that market cap weighting also makes VOO top heavy, a lot of the companies that QQQ is missing out on make up only a tiny percentage, each, of the value of VOO.</p>\n<p>Only 156 companies that are excluded from QQQ make up more than .10% each of the value of VOO. The rest of the excluded companies each make up such a small part of the total value of VOO that many of them would have to experience dramatic growth for them to contribute enough added value to VOO to make a difference in your returns.</p>\n<p>Below is a list of the stocks each of which make up more than .25% of VOO which are not held in QQQ.</p>\n<p><b>Stocks in VOO Excluded from QQQ</b></p>\n<p>Source: List of All Portfolio Holdings downloaded from Invesco and Vanguard and Analyzed by the Author</p>\n<p>As you can see, this list includes many fine stocks, including the biggest Financial, Retail, Consumer Staples, Manufacturing, Energy, Utility, and Pharmaceutical stocks.</p>\n<p>Given that QQQ only holds stocks of companies that listed themselves on the relatively new Nasdaq exchange it, by design, excludes the stocks of these mostly older, fully mature companies, even though some, like Visa(NYSE:V)and American Tower Corp(NYSE:AMT)are very much involved with tech, and have been very generous to their stockholders. But there is definitely a skew towards older, mature, companies in VOO, many of whose stocks appeal to retirees and other dividend-oriented investors.</p>\n<p>It would be easy to label many of these stocks \"value stocks,\" as in the past that is just what many of them were. But as anyone who has spent any time looking at individual stock recently knows, the P/E ratios of many of what used to be value stocks have become extremely inflated, especially considering these mature companies' much slower rates of earnings growth.</p>\n<p>QQQ, since it doesn't require that stocks come from companies earning profits, holds more growth stocks, and since it only picks the Nasdaq stocks most popular with investors, those growth stocks it holds are the ones that are currently growing. When a company whose stock is currently in QQQ stops growing earnings or something else causes its share prices to decline to where its market cap is no longer in the top 100 for a significant amount of time, they will be replaced by some other up and coming growth Nasdaq stock that has been climbing up through the ranks of Nasdaq's next 100 stocks by market cap weight. (The stocks ranked in the second 100 stocks by market cap weight in the Nasdaq can also be invested in, via a much newer and less popular ETF, the Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF(NASDAQ:QQQJ).</p>\n<p>There is another consideration when comparing VOO and QQQ. You will often see it cited by self-appointed media investing pundits that tech stocks (and by extension QQQ) will fall if interest rates rise because these companies need to borrow a lot of money to grow. But the very high debt/cap ratios of many of the mature stocks held only in VOO suggest that they, too, will find themselves strained by rising rates and costs, without, in many cases, having the kind of growth potential that could let them get by selling more stock. I don't see this as a reason to be wary of QQQ.</p>\n<p><b>So Is VOO or QQQ the Better Buy?</b></p>\n<p>I'm coming to think that you can only answer this question by spending some time poring over these lists of actual stock holdings.If you think that the non-financial mega-cap super-companies – the ones that dominate the top 10 holdings by weight of both ETFs – are likely to continue ruling the investing world, it makes more sense to invest in QQQ than VOO.Its smaller number of stocks gives more influence to each stock it holds and it holds a lot of those mega-caps.</p>\n<p>But if you buy into QQQ, you should keep in mind that it is more of a growth stock popularity ETF than is VOO. Investors have been in love with growth stocks for quite a while,and for good reason – the ones nowdominating QQQ have lived up to the dreams of those who invested in them a decade ago. But if future events should change the psychology of market investors dramatically, and investors suffer serious pain owning non-profitable growth stocks in the next major market downturn, there is always the possibility that QQQ could under-perform VOO.</p>\n<p>Remember that the one big advantage that VOO has is that it isn't limited to listing stocks that appear on any one exchange. The committee that selects stocks for the S&amp;P 500 index that VOO follows has much more latitude in picking stocks for the index. Their only limitation is that a stock be profitable and that it be a large cap stock. If the kinds of stocks now dominating QQQ do go out of favor, the S&amp;P 500 can adapt far better than QQQ because it is not as limited in which stocks it can choose to hold.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>VOO Vs QQQ: Which ETF Is The Better Buy?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nVOO Vs QQQ: Which ETF Is The Better Buy?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-08-26 19:36 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4451767-voo-vs-qqq-etf-better-buy><strong>seekingalpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Summary\n\nQQQ has out-performed VOO both since inception and over the past decade, making some investors question why VOO is so much more popular among index investors.\nAs the market keeps notching all...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4451767-voo-vs-qqq-etf-better-buy\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"QQQ":"纳指100ETF","VOO":"Vanguard标普500ETF"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4451767-voo-vs-qqq-etf-better-buy","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1177725104","content_text":"Summary\n\nQQQ has out-performed VOO both since inception and over the past decade, making some investors question why VOO is so much more popular among index investors.\nAs the market keeps notching all time highs, it's informative to see how these two ETFs performed for investors who bought them at previous market peaks that preceded major crashes.\nThe stocks held in QQQ that are excluded by VOO make up only 7% of the total value of QQQ, but each stock in QQQ has more impact.\nDeciding which ETF makes the better investment now requires taking a close look at the larger cap stocks held in VOO that are not part of QQQ.\n\nsyahrir maulana/iStock via Getty Images\nWhen given the advice to invest in a \"broad stock market index\" many people immediately think that means they should buy an ETF that follows the S&P 500 like the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF(NYSEARCA:VOO). After all, Warren Buffett is famous for telling his stockholders, \"My regular recommendation has been a low-cost S&P 500 index fund.\" He put his money where his mouth was, too, when he made a million-dollar bet with hedge fund managers that, over 10 years, he could beat their results with an S&P 500 index fund--which he did.\nBut when you tune into your favorite financial channel, or check the front page of any investing site, including this one, the S&P 500 index is only one of the three major indexes that are always reported and give a minute by minute reading of the state of the market as a whole. The other two major indexes are the Nasdaq, which you can invest invia QQQ andthe Dow.\nThe Dow is far from being a \"broad market index\" as it only holds 30 stocks. Most knowledgeable investors regard it as a relic of a simpler past that is reported only because of its historical importance. Though I have made a case that it is a pretty good proxy for the value and income segments of the market as a whole in a previous article, I would not recommend that an investor looking to buy a broad market index invest in a Dow ETF.\nBut what about the Nasdaq, which investors usually invest in via the Invesco QQQ Trust(NASDAQ:QQQ)? The Nasdaq is also a broad market index and one that has been outperforming the S&P 500 index dramatically over the past decade, as you can see in the chart below.\nSource:Seeking Alpha\nThough older investors will remember the Nasdaq's dramatic fall at the turn of this century, its dramatic rise before that collapse was strong enough that even with that collapse that it still equaled or outperformed the S&P 500 index at any time since its inception in 1971.\nSource: Yahoo Finance\nThoughwe are told not to chase performance, it's hard to argue with that kind of out-performance, especially when it rewarded investors so well. At least those who bought and held for the long-term, which is what we are also told we should do.\nLooking at these charts you have to ask yourself why all the academics and most investment advisors continue to recommend that index-loving investors stick with low cost indexes that follow the S&P 500, rather than one that follows the Nasdaq. That is a question I have been asking myself, of late, too.\nThe ETFs that Track The S&P 500 and Nasdaq\nYou can't buy any of these indexes directly, you have to invest in a fund or ETF that tracks that index. The largest ETF that tracks the S&P 500 is the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF which has 243.7 billion dollars of assets under management. At first glance, this makes it sound like VOO is smaller than the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust(NYSEARCA:SPY), which also tracks the S&P 500 index and holds 397.27 billion dollars worth of assets. But VOO, it turns out, is actually just a share class of a Vanguard mutual fund, The Vanguard 500 Index Fund(VFIAX). The total assets of this Vanguard fund and ETF combination are a whopping 777.3 billion dollars. This is not as surprising when you remember that the Vanguard 500 Index Fund was the very first index tracking fund and has been gathering assets since it started trading in 1976.\nThe most common way to invest in the Nasdaq is via the Invesco QQQ Trust. Unlike VOO which invests in all the stocks in the S&P 500 index, QQQ invests only in the Nasdaq index's top 100 non-financial stocks, ignoring most of the other 3,000+ stocks in the full Nasdaq index. You can read more on the details about how QQQ works in my previous article which you can findhere.\nIn the rest of this article, I am going to try to answer some of the questions you should be asking yourself in order to decide whether VOO or QQQ would be a better investment for you right now. Historical returns are wonderful, but only if you could go back in time to do your investing. Since Tesla has not yet come up with a working time machine, we have to think critically about those past returns in order to decide if there is a good chance they will continue to repeat the same patterns.\nHow Did Investors in These ETFs Do Investing at Previous Peaks?The Dot.com Peak\nPerformance can be very different from what you see on graphs like those I showed you above depending on when your investment was made. Most working people scale into an investment, a bit every paycheck or two, which makes the returns shown on any chart with an arbitrary starting point misleading. Your own results can only be determined by putting your portfolio into a spreadsheet or other software tool.\nBut given that we are currently in a situation where both indexes are at all-time highs, many investors, including highly sophisticated professionals far more knowledgeable than I am, are holding their breaths waiting for the next big correction. Some are hoping that itisa correction and not a full fledged crash. So the obvious question to ask, when considering these two ETFs is what has been the experience of investors who bought into them at previous market peaks that were followed by serious downturns?\nQQQ started trading in 1999. But the VOO ETF share class of Vanguard's 500 Index Fund did not begin trading until September of 2010, which is well after the two major market crashes that have occurred in the past two decades. Therefore, I am going to use the investors share class of the Vanguard 500 Index Fund(VFINX), which is just another share class of VOO, but was trading throughout the 1990s as a comparison to QQQ.\nTotal Return of QQQ and VFINX Since Dot.com Peak\nSource:Seeking Alpha\nAs you can see, investors who bought into QQQ at the top of the Dot.com boom in 2000 have seriously under-performed those who bought the Vanguard 500 Index Fund at the same time. It took a very long 14 years for those QQQ investors to get back their original investment. That is a long, long time to hold any investment and it is likely most investors who did buy QQQ at its peak ended up taking heavy losses and moving on. Even now, the return of those who invested in QQQ at that peak and held still lags that of the S&P 500 fund. This explains pretty well why all those advisors, and Mr. Buffett, choose the S&P 500 over QQQ.\nThe Financial Crisis\nFrom the above chart we see that the S&P 500 index fund dropped more in 2008 than did QQQ. This should be no surprise when you remember that QQQ excludes the financial stocks listed in the Nasdaq index and that crash was caused by a financial crisis.\nSo what happened to investors who invested in QQQ and VOO at the market peak that occurred before the 2008 Financial Crisis? (We are still looking at the mutual fund version of VOO here as VOO only started trading in 2010.)\nTotal Return of QQQ and VFINX Since the Pre-Financial Crisis Peak\nSource:Seeking Alpha\nThose investors made out like bandits. Those who invested in QQQ in 2008 came out way ahead.\nThe COVID-19 Flash Crash\nFinally, let's look at what would happen if you invested in QQQ or VOO at the market peak that preceded last year's Covid-19 Flash Crash.\nTotal Return of QQQ and VOO Since the Pre-COVID-19 Peak\nSource:Seeking Alpha\nHere again we see that VOO dipped further and recovered more slowly than did QQQ during the COVID-19 crash. Clearly something had changed between the crash in 2000 and subsequent market crashes. To get a better idea of what explains this change we need to look more closely at the actual holdings of these two ETFs.\nThe Real Differences Between These Two ETFs\nThe most significant difference between the holdings of the two ETFs, beyond the fact that they track different indexes is that there are five times as many stocks in VOO. This is not quite as big a deal as it might sound. That's because both of these ETFs are Market Cap Weighted in a market that has seen the emergence of a small handful of super-companies, the Mega Cap stocks, with market caps far huger than that of most other companies worldwide.\nThe top 10 stocks in VOO make up 28.60% of its entire value. The top 10 stocks in QQQ make up 52.82% of its value. (Data as of July 31, 2021).\nSource:Seeking AlphaandVanguard.com\nAs you can see those top 10 stocks in both ETFs are almost identical. Of those top 10 stocks, only Berkshire Hathaway(NYSE:BRK.A)is completely missing from QQQ. While PayPal(NASDAQ:PYPL)and Adobe(NASDAQ:ADBE)appear in QQQ's top 10 and not in VOO's, they are both still found just a few positions lower in VOO's list of holdings.\nIt's also worth pointing out that while most people think of QQQ as being a tech ETF, and attribute its out-performance over the past decade to it being heavy in tech stocks, it also holds quite a few stocks from non-tech sectors, too.\nQQQ Holdings by Sector\nSource:Seeking Alpha\nYou must keep in mind that the only factor that unites all the stocks in QQQ is that they all are listed on the Nasdaq instead of the NYSE or some other exchange. Since the Nasdaq is a younger index, the Nasdaq by definition excludes the stocks of the many long-established major U.S. companies that have been trading uninterrupted on the NYSE since before 1971. Until the last decade, listing a new stock on the Nasdaq exchange did not have the prestige that listing on the NYSE did, and it was cheaper to list a stock on it, too, so the Nasdaq got the reputation of being the place to find start ups, even though by now some of those start ups have become the FAANGM behemoths that now dominate both QQQ and VOO.\nVOO Holds Only Profitable Companies\nAnother major difference between the two indexes is that an S&P committee curates the holdings of the 500 index and hence of VOO. It only selects from those companies that can show two sequential quarters of profits. There is no curation involved in selecting the holdings of QQQ. QQQ simply selects the top 100 stocks weighted by market cap present in the Nasdaq index. Thus there is no requirement that the stocks in QQQ, be profitable. This has allowed growth stocks like Amazon and Tesla that go for years or even decades without reporting any significant profits to play a huge role in QQQ's out-performance.\nThough the collapse of QQQ in 2000 had a lot to do with how many companies in that index were earning eyeballs rather than dollars. The top stocks that make up slightly more than half of QQQ's value today are profitable and of far higher quality than the Dot-com darlings that dominated QQQ in 2000.\nFor today's investor, the difference between the two indexes is not so much quality, but that smaller number of stocks in QQQ give each stock held more impact. You end up with twice as much of the stocks held by both ETFs when you buy QQQ.\nWhat Stocks Are in QQQ that Aren't in VOO?\nUsing a little spreadsheet magic, I matched the stock holdings of QQQ and VOO and came up with the list of the stocks that are in QQQ butnotin VOO. Those stocks turn out to make up only 7.35% of the total value of QQQ.\nThis analysis is based on the stock weightings reported as of June 30, 2021, which were the ones available last week when I did it. The actual list of stocks held by the two ETFs have not changed since then, though the percentages might be very slightly different now than a month ago.\nStocks Held by QQQ But Not By VOO as of June 30, 2021\nSource: List of All Portfolio Holdings downloaded fromInvescoand Vanguard and Analyzed by the Author\nThe first thing that leaps out from this list is how small an impact most of these stocks have on the total value of QQQ. Only Moderna(NASDAQ:MRNA)makes up more than 1% of the value of the ETF. There is almost 100 times more Apple(NASDAQ:AAPL)in QQQ than there is Sirius XM(NASDAQ:SIRI).\nYou can also see that while these stocks skew heavily towards tech and communications, Moderna, which is a health care stock is by far the most important. Most of these are recently listed companies that have not yet made a profit, but have attracted lots of growth investors. Remember there are another 3,400 or so stocks in the Nasdaq that are not in QQQ. It represents only the Nasdaq stocks that have attracted the most investors.\nWhat is in VOO that is Not in QQQ?\nObviously, since there are 400 more stocks in the S&P 500 than in the Nasdaq 100. There are far too many stocks excluded from QQQ for us to list them all here. But given that market cap weighting also makes VOO top heavy, a lot of the companies that QQQ is missing out on make up only a tiny percentage, each, of the value of VOO.\nOnly 156 companies that are excluded from QQQ make up more than .10% each of the value of VOO. The rest of the excluded companies each make up such a small part of the total value of VOO that many of them would have to experience dramatic growth for them to contribute enough added value to VOO to make a difference in your returns.\nBelow is a list of the stocks each of which make up more than .25% of VOO which are not held in QQQ.\nStocks in VOO Excluded from QQQ\nSource: List of All Portfolio Holdings downloaded from Invesco and Vanguard and Analyzed by the Author\nAs you can see, this list includes many fine stocks, including the biggest Financial, Retail, Consumer Staples, Manufacturing, Energy, Utility, and Pharmaceutical stocks.\nGiven that QQQ only holds stocks of companies that listed themselves on the relatively new Nasdaq exchange it, by design, excludes the stocks of these mostly older, fully mature companies, even though some, like Visa(NYSE:V)and American Tower Corp(NYSE:AMT)are very much involved with tech, and have been very generous to their stockholders. But there is definitely a skew towards older, mature, companies in VOO, many of whose stocks appeal to retirees and other dividend-oriented investors.\nIt would be easy to label many of these stocks \"value stocks,\" as in the past that is just what many of them were. But as anyone who has spent any time looking at individual stock recently knows, the P/E ratios of many of what used to be value stocks have become extremely inflated, especially considering these mature companies' much slower rates of earnings growth.\nQQQ, since it doesn't require that stocks come from companies earning profits, holds more growth stocks, and since it only picks the Nasdaq stocks most popular with investors, those growth stocks it holds are the ones that are currently growing. When a company whose stock is currently in QQQ stops growing earnings or something else causes its share prices to decline to where its market cap is no longer in the top 100 for a significant amount of time, they will be replaced by some other up and coming growth Nasdaq stock that has been climbing up through the ranks of Nasdaq's next 100 stocks by market cap weight. (The stocks ranked in the second 100 stocks by market cap weight in the Nasdaq can also be invested in, via a much newer and less popular ETF, the Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF(NASDAQ:QQQJ).\nThere is another consideration when comparing VOO and QQQ. You will often see it cited by self-appointed media investing pundits that tech stocks (and by extension QQQ) will fall if interest rates rise because these companies need to borrow a lot of money to grow. But the very high debt/cap ratios of many of the mature stocks held only in VOO suggest that they, too, will find themselves strained by rising rates and costs, without, in many cases, having the kind of growth potential that could let them get by selling more stock. I don't see this as a reason to be wary of QQQ.\nSo Is VOO or QQQ the Better Buy?\nI'm coming to think that you can only answer this question by spending some time poring over these lists of actual stock holdings.If you think that the non-financial mega-cap super-companies – the ones that dominate the top 10 holdings by weight of both ETFs – are likely to continue ruling the investing world, it makes more sense to invest in QQQ than VOO.Its smaller number of stocks gives more influence to each stock it holds and it holds a lot of those mega-caps.\nBut if you buy into QQQ, you should keep in mind that it is more of a growth stock popularity ETF than is VOO. Investors have been in love with growth stocks for quite a while,and for good reason – the ones nowdominating QQQ have lived up to the dreams of those who invested in them a decade ago. But if future events should change the psychology of market investors dramatically, and investors suffer serious pain owning non-profitable growth stocks in the next major market downturn, there is always the possibility that QQQ could under-perform VOO.\nRemember that the one big advantage that VOO has is that it isn't limited to listing stocks that appear on any one exchange. The committee that selects stocks for the S&P 500 index that VOO follows has much more latitude in picking stocks for the index. Their only limitation is that a stock be profitable and that it be a large cap stock. If the kinds of stocks now dominating QQQ do go out of favor, the S&P 500 can adapt far better than QQQ because it is not as limited in which stocks it can choose to hold.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":18,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":899374382,"gmtCreate":1628165649046,"gmtModify":1703502384800,"author":{"id":"3577409082356068","authorId":"3577409082356068","name":"babiboo","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8be2f9f25874d7f974661428b042a2e7","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577409082356068","authorIdStr":"3577409082356068"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Wow","listText":"Wow","text":"Wow","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/899374382","repostId":"1121665544","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1121665544","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Stock Market Quotes, Business News, Financial News, Trading Ideas, and Stock Research by Professionals","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Benzinga","id":"1052270027","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa"},"pubTimestamp":1628163411,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1121665544?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-08-05 19:36","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Begins Promoting Own Services With Exclusive 'Offers' For Apple Card Customers","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1121665544","media":"Benzinga","summary":"Apple Inc. is promoting its own services by providing “exclusive offers” to Apple Card holders.\nWhat","content":"<p><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">Apple</a> Inc.</b>&nbsp;is promoting its own services by providing “exclusive offers” to Apple Card holders.</p>\n<p><b>What Happened</b>: A new section in the Wallet app offers special deals related to Apple’s own services for Apple Card customers, 9to5Macreported.</p>\n<p>Apple’s first offer for Apple Card owners reportedly gives free access to Apple <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NWS\">News</a>+ and unlimited coffee with any order from<b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PNRA\">Panera Bread</a></b>.</p>\n<p>However, tapping on the \"Learn More\" button redirects users to a broken link, indicating that Apple is still in the process of rolling out the offer.</p>\n<p>Bloomberg journalist&nbsp;<b>Mark Gurman</b>&nbsp;also noted the Apple offer on <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TWTR\">Twitter</a>.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c820ee97c3c12bd77e989fd5c740c6bd\" tg-width=\"560\" tg-height=\"308\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p><b>Why It Matters</b>: Apple already provides exclusive offers from other stores or services to Apple Card users, but the latest offer indicates highlights the<b>Tim Cook</b>-led company's efforts&nbsp;to promote its own services.</p>\n<p>In April, Apple introduced new features to the Apple Card by allowing two people to “co-own” a credit card. The iPhone maker also added the ability for up to five people to share an Apple Card account as long as they are part of the same family and are 13 years or older.</p>\n<p><b>Price Action</b>: Apple shares closed almost 0.3% lower in Wednesday’s trading session at $146.95.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Begins Promoting Own Services With Exclusive 'Offers' For Apple Card Customers</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Begins Promoting Own Services With Exclusive 'Offers' For Apple Card Customers\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Benzinga </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-08-05 19:36</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">Apple</a> Inc.</b>&nbsp;is promoting its own services by providing “exclusive offers” to Apple Card holders.</p>\n<p><b>What Happened</b>: A new section in the Wallet app offers special deals related to Apple’s own services for Apple Card customers, 9to5Macreported.</p>\n<p>Apple’s first offer for Apple Card owners reportedly gives free access to Apple <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NWS\">News</a>+ and unlimited coffee with any order from<b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PNRA\">Panera Bread</a></b>.</p>\n<p>However, tapping on the \"Learn More\" button redirects users to a broken link, indicating that Apple is still in the process of rolling out the offer.</p>\n<p>Bloomberg journalist&nbsp;<b>Mark Gurman</b>&nbsp;also noted the Apple offer on <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TWTR\">Twitter</a>.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c820ee97c3c12bd77e989fd5c740c6bd\" tg-width=\"560\" tg-height=\"308\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p><b>Why It Matters</b>: Apple already provides exclusive offers from other stores or services to Apple Card users, but the latest offer indicates highlights the<b>Tim Cook</b>-led company's efforts&nbsp;to promote its own services.</p>\n<p>In April, Apple introduced new features to the Apple Card by allowing two people to “co-own” a credit card. The iPhone maker also added the ability for up to five people to share an Apple Card account as long as they are part of the same family and are 13 years or older.</p>\n<p><b>Price Action</b>: Apple shares closed almost 0.3% lower in Wednesday’s trading session at $146.95.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"09086":"华夏纳指-U","AAPL":"苹果","CUBI":"Customers Bancorp Inc.","03086":"华夏纳指"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1121665544","content_text":"Apple Inc. is promoting its own services by providing “exclusive offers” to Apple Card holders.\nWhat Happened: A new section in the Wallet app offers special deals related to Apple’s own services for Apple Card customers, 9to5Macreported.\nApple’s first offer for Apple Card owners reportedly gives free access to Apple News+ and unlimited coffee with any order fromPanera Bread.\nHowever, tapping on the \"Learn More\" button redirects users to a broken link, indicating that Apple is still in the process of rolling out the offer.\nBloomberg journalist Mark Gurman also noted the Apple offer on Twitter.\n\nWhy It Matters: Apple already provides exclusive offers from other stores or services to Apple Card users, but the latest offer indicates highlights theTim Cook-led company's efforts to promote its own services.\nIn April, Apple introduced new features to the Apple Card by allowing two people to “co-own” a credit card. The iPhone maker also added the ability for up to five people to share an Apple Card account as long as they are part of the same family and are 13 years or older.\nPrice Action: Apple shares closed almost 0.3% lower in Wednesday’s trading session at $146.95.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":49,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9013646638,"gmtCreate":1648727886952,"gmtModify":1676534386707,"author":{"id":"3577409082356068","authorId":"3577409082356068","name":"babiboo","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8be2f9f25874d7f974661428b042a2e7","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577409082356068","authorIdStr":"3577409082356068"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hmmm","listText":"Hmmm","text":"Hmmm","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9013646638","repostId":"2223840368","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2223840368","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1648726542,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2223840368?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-03-31 19:35","market":"uk","language":"en","title":"BHP Prepares for Fresh Battle Against $6.6 Bln Brazil Dam Lawsuit","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2223840368","media":"Reuters","summary":"* Around 200,000 Brazilians sue over 2015 collapse of Fundao dam* 100,000 potential new claimants wa","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>* Around 200,000 Brazilians sue over 2015 collapse of Fundao dam</p><p>* 100,000 potential new claimants want to join - claimant lawyer</p><p>* BHP says case duplicates proceedings in Brazil</p><p>* Senior lawyers have said case has &#34;real prospect of success&#34;</p><p>LONDON, March 31 (Reuters) - Anglo-Australian mining giant BHP is preparing to battle a resurrected 5 billion pound ($6.6 billion) lawsuit in London&#39;s Court of Appeal next week, launched by around 200,000 Brazilians over a devastating dam failure in 2015.</p><p>The claim, one of the largest in English legal history, seeks to hold BHP to account for the disaster in English courts, emulating lawsuits brought in London against miner Vedanta and oil giant Shell    by villagers over alleged pollution in Zambia and oil spills in the Niger delta respectively.</p><p>The Vedanta case has since settled.</p><p>The collapse of the Fundao dam, owned by the Samarco venture between BHP and Brazilian iron ore mining giant Vale, ranks as Brazil&#39;s worst environmental disaster.</p><p>Nineteen were killed and villages obliterated as a torrent of more than 40 million cubic metres of mining waste swept into the Doce river and Atlantic Ocean over 650 km (400 miles) away.</p><p>Tom Goodhead, a managing partner at law firm PGMBM, which is bringing the claim on behalf of individuals - including indigenous people - businesses, churches, organisations and municipalities, told Reuters the team was &#34;very confident&#34;.</p><p>About 120,000 claimants had been to walk-in centres in Brazil to update their details in recent months, he said, and another potential 100,000 new clients wanted to join.</p><p>BHP, the world&#39;s largest mining company by market value, has labelled the case pointless and wasteful, saying it duplicates proceedings in Brazil and the work of the Renova Foundation, an entity created by the company and its Brazilian partners to manage reparations and repairs.</p><p>The company says it is fully committed to &#34;doing the right thing&#34; and has paid nearly 9 billion reais ($1.89 billion) in compensation and direct financial aid to over 360,000 people and will have spent roughly 30 billion reais on reparation and compensation programmes by year-end.</p><p>Claimant lawyers argue that most clients have not brought proceedings in Brazil or sought compensation that excludes them from English proceedings and that Brazilian litigation is so lengthy it cannot provide full redress in a realistic timeframe.</p><p>But Goodhead conceded the case had been a rollercoaster.</p><p>It was blocked by the English High Court in 2020 and, one year later, by the Court of Appeal, which initially agreed it would be &#34;irredeemably unmanageable&#34;.</p><p>But after a last-ditch oral hearing, Court of Appeal judges last July made a rare U-turn, stating the case had a &#34;real prospect of success&#34;.</p><p>The five-day hearing, which begins on Monday, will help  establish whether the case can be heard in Britain, although the judgment is expected to be reserved - and the case could be appealed to the Supreme Court.</p><p>Further trials will determine liability and quantify damages in the absence of any settlement.</p><p>($1 = 0.7623 pounds)</p><p>($1 = 4.7704 reais)</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>BHP Prepares for Fresh Battle Against $6.6 Bln Brazil Dam Lawsuit</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBHP Prepares for Fresh Battle Against $6.6 Bln Brazil Dam Lawsuit\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-03-31 19:35</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>* Around 200,000 Brazilians sue over 2015 collapse of Fundao dam</p><p>* 100,000 potential new claimants want to join - claimant lawyer</p><p>* BHP says case duplicates proceedings in Brazil</p><p>* Senior lawyers have said case has &#34;real prospect of success&#34;</p><p>LONDON, March 31 (Reuters) - Anglo-Australian mining giant BHP is preparing to battle a resurrected 5 billion pound ($6.6 billion) lawsuit in London&#39;s Court of Appeal next week, launched by around 200,000 Brazilians over a devastating dam failure in 2015.</p><p>The claim, one of the largest in English legal history, seeks to hold BHP to account for the disaster in English courts, emulating lawsuits brought in London against miner Vedanta and oil giant Shell    by villagers over alleged pollution in Zambia and oil spills in the Niger delta respectively.</p><p>The Vedanta case has since settled.</p><p>The collapse of the Fundao dam, owned by the Samarco venture between BHP and Brazilian iron ore mining giant Vale, ranks as Brazil&#39;s worst environmental disaster.</p><p>Nineteen were killed and villages obliterated as a torrent of more than 40 million cubic metres of mining waste swept into the Doce river and Atlantic Ocean over 650 km (400 miles) away.</p><p>Tom Goodhead, a managing partner at law firm PGMBM, which is bringing the claim on behalf of individuals - including indigenous people - businesses, churches, organisations and municipalities, told Reuters the team was &#34;very confident&#34;.</p><p>About 120,000 claimants had been to walk-in centres in Brazil to update their details in recent months, he said, and another potential 100,000 new clients wanted to join.</p><p>BHP, the world&#39;s largest mining company by market value, has labelled the case pointless and wasteful, saying it duplicates proceedings in Brazil and the work of the Renova Foundation, an entity created by the company and its Brazilian partners to manage reparations and repairs.</p><p>The company says it is fully committed to &#34;doing the right thing&#34; and has paid nearly 9 billion reais ($1.89 billion) in compensation and direct financial aid to over 360,000 people and will have spent roughly 30 billion reais on reparation and compensation programmes by year-end.</p><p>Claimant lawyers argue that most clients have not brought proceedings in Brazil or sought compensation that excludes them from English proceedings and that Brazilian litigation is so lengthy it cannot provide full redress in a realistic timeframe.</p><p>But Goodhead conceded the case had been a rollercoaster.</p><p>It was blocked by the English High Court in 2020 and, one year later, by the Court of Appeal, which initially agreed it would be &#34;irredeemably unmanageable&#34;.</p><p>But after a last-ditch oral hearing, Court of Appeal judges last July made a rare U-turn, stating the case had a &#34;real prospect of success&#34;.</p><p>The five-day hearing, which begins on Monday, will help  establish whether the case can be heard in Britain, although the judgment is expected to be reserved - and the case could be appealed to the Supreme Court.</p><p>Further trials will determine liability and quantify damages in the absence of any settlement.</p><p>($1 = 0.7623 pounds)</p><p>($1 = 4.7704 reais)</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BHP.AU":"BHP GROUP LTD","BK4168":"多种金属与采矿","BHP":"必和必拓公司","BBL":"必和必拓"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2223840368","content_text":"* Around 200,000 Brazilians sue over 2015 collapse of Fundao dam* 100,000 potential new claimants want to join - claimant lawyer* BHP says case duplicates proceedings in Brazil* Senior lawyers have said case has \"real prospect of success\"LONDON, March 31 (Reuters) - Anglo-Australian mining giant BHP is preparing to battle a resurrected 5 billion pound ($6.6 billion) lawsuit in London's Court of Appeal next week, launched by around 200,000 Brazilians over a devastating dam failure in 2015.The claim, one of the largest in English legal history, seeks to hold BHP to account for the disaster in English courts, emulating lawsuits brought in London against miner Vedanta and oil giant Shell    by villagers over alleged pollution in Zambia and oil spills in the Niger delta respectively.The Vedanta case has since settled.The collapse of the Fundao dam, owned by the Samarco venture between BHP and Brazilian iron ore mining giant Vale, ranks as Brazil's worst environmental disaster.Nineteen were killed and villages obliterated as a torrent of more than 40 million cubic metres of mining waste swept into the Doce river and Atlantic Ocean over 650 km (400 miles) away.Tom Goodhead, a managing partner at law firm PGMBM, which is bringing the claim on behalf of individuals - including indigenous people - businesses, churches, organisations and municipalities, told Reuters the team was \"very confident\".About 120,000 claimants had been to walk-in centres in Brazil to update their details in recent months, he said, and another potential 100,000 new clients wanted to join.BHP, the world's largest mining company by market value, has labelled the case pointless and wasteful, saying it duplicates proceedings in Brazil and the work of the Renova Foundation, an entity created by the company and its Brazilian partners to manage reparations and repairs.The company says it is fully committed to \"doing the right thing\" and has paid nearly 9 billion reais ($1.89 billion) in compensation and direct financial aid to over 360,000 people and will have spent roughly 30 billion reais on reparation and compensation programmes by year-end.Claimant lawyers argue that most clients have not brought proceedings in Brazil or sought compensation that excludes them from English proceedings and that Brazilian litigation is so lengthy it cannot provide full redress in a realistic timeframe.But Goodhead conceded the case had been a rollercoaster.It was blocked by the English High Court in 2020 and, one year later, by the Court of Appeal, which initially agreed it would be \"irredeemably unmanageable\".But after a last-ditch oral hearing, Court of Appeal judges last July made a rare U-turn, stating the case had a \"real prospect of success\".The five-day hearing, which begins on Monday, will help  establish whether the case can be heard in Britain, although the judgment is expected to be reserved - and the case could be appealed to the Supreme Court.Further trials will determine liability and quantify damages in the absence of any settlement.($1 = 0.7623 pounds)($1 = 4.7704 reais)","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":102,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":831369497,"gmtCreate":1629289481019,"gmtModify":1676529992137,"author":{"id":"3577409082356068","authorId":"3577409082356068","name":"babiboo","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8be2f9f25874d7f974661428b042a2e7","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577409082356068","authorIdStr":"3577409082356068"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Omoo","listText":"Omoo","text":"Omoo","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/831369497","repostId":"1193971492","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":29,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9986990123,"gmtCreate":1666871520263,"gmtModify":1676537820274,"author":{"id":"3577409082356068","authorId":"3577409082356068","name":"babiboo","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8be2f9f25874d7f974661428b042a2e7","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577409082356068","authorIdStr":"3577409082356068"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/QQQ\">$Invesco QQQ Trust(QQQ)$</a>hmm","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/QQQ\">$Invesco QQQ Trust(QQQ)$</a>hmm","text":"$Invesco QQQ Trust(QQQ)$hmm","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/e770977673183ae0dc4ab5fea377e284","width":"1080","height":"1920"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":1,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9986990123","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":165,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9932413756,"gmtCreate":1662974158875,"gmtModify":1676537174354,"author":{"id":"3577409082356068","authorId":"3577409082356068","name":"babiboo","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8be2f9f25874d7f974661428b042a2e7","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577409082356068","authorIdStr":"3577409082356068"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Watt","listText":"Watt","text":"Watt","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9932413756","repostId":"2266390451","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2266390451","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1662973466,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2266390451?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-09-12 17:04","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Stock-Market Wild Card: What Investors Need to Know as Fed Shrinks Balance Sheet at Faster Pace","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2266390451","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"Quantitative easing is credited with juicing equity returns and boosting other speculative assets by","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Quantitative easing is credited with juicing equity returns and boosting other speculative assets by flooding markets with liquidity as the Federal Reserve snapped up trillions of dollars in bonds after the financial crisis and amid the coronavirus pandemic. Investors and policy makers may be underestimating what happens as the tide goes out.</p><p>&#34;I don&#39;t know if the Fed or anybody else truly understands the impact of QT just yet,&#34; said Aidan Garrib, head of global macro strategy and research at Montreal-based PGM Global, in a phone interview.</p><p>The Fed, in fact, began slowly shrinking its balance sheet -- a process known as quantitative tightening, or QT -- earlier this year. Now it&#39;s accelerating the process, as planned, and it&#39;s making some market watchers nervous.</p><p>A lack of historical experience around the process is raising the uncertainty level. Meanwhile, research that increasingly credits quantitative easing, or QE, with giving asset prices a lift logically points to the potential for QT to do the opposite.</p><p>Since 2010, QE has explained about 50% of the movement in market price-to-earnings multiples, said Savita Subramanian, equity and quant strategist at Bank of America, in an Aug. 15 research note (see chart below).</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c7ba2d5fe717396f178495c88a6ba8f6\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"748\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>&#34;Based on the strong linear relationship between QE and S&amp;P 500 returns from 2010 to 2019, QT through 2023 would translate into a 7 percentage-point drop in the S&amp;P 500 from here,&#34; she wrote.</p><p>In quantitative easing, a central bank creates credit that&#39;s used to buy securities on the open market. Purchases of long-dated bonds are intended to drive down yields, which is seen enhancing appetite for risky assets as investors look elsewhere for higher returns. QE creates new reserves on bank balance sheets. The added cushion gives banks, which must hold reserves in line with regulations, more room to lend or to finance trading activity by hedge funds and other financial market participants, further enhancing market liquidity.</p><p>The way to think about the relationship between QE and equities is to note that as central banks undertake QE, it raises forward earnings expectations. That, in turn, lowers the equity risk premium, which is the extra return investors demand to hold risky equities over safe Treasurys, noted PGM Global&#39;s Garrib. Investors are willing to venture further out on the risk curve, he said, which explains the surge in earnings-free &#34;dream stocks&#34; and other highly speculative assets amid the QE flood as the economy and stock market recovered from the pandemic in 2021.</p><p>However, with the economy recovering and inflation rising the Fed began shrinking its balance sheet in June, and is doubling the pace in September to its maximum rate of $95 billion per month. This will be accomplished by letting $60 billion of Treasurys and $35 billion of mortgage backed securities roll off the balance sheet without reinvestment. At that pace, the balance sheet could shrink by $1 trillion in a year.</p><p>The unwinding of the Fed&#39;s balance sheet that began in 2017 after the economy had long recovered from the 2008-2009 crisis was supposed to be as exciting as &#34;watching paint dry,&#34; then-Federal Reserve Chairwoman Janet Yellen said at the time. It was a ho-hum affair until the fall of 2019, when the Fed had to inject cash into malfunctioning money markets. QE then resumed in 2020 in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p>More economists and analysts have been ringing alarm bells over the possibility of a repeat of the 2019 liquidity crunch.</p><p>&#34;If the past repeats, the shrinking of the central bank&#39;s balance sheet is not likely to be an entirely benign process and will require careful monitoring of the banking sector&#39;s on-and off-balance sheet demandable liabilities,&#34; warned Raghuram Rajan, former governor of the Reserve Bank of India and former chief economist at the International Monetary Fund, and other researchers in a paper presented at the Kansas City Fed&#39;s annual symposium in Jackson Hole, Wyoming, last month.</p><p>Hedge-fund giant Bridgewater Associates in June warned that QT was contributing to a &#34;liquidity hole&#34; in the bond market.</p><p>The slow pace of the wind-down so far and the composition of the balance-sheet reduction have muted the effect of QT so far, but that&#39;s set to change, Garrib said.</p><p>He noted that QT is usually described in the context of the asset side of the Fed&#39;s balance sheet, but it&#39;s the liability side that matters to financial markets. And so far, reductions in Fed liabilities have been concentrated in the Treasury General Account, or TGA, which effectively serves as the government&#39;s checking account.</p><p>That&#39;s actually served to improve market liquidity he explained, as it means the government has been spending money to pay for goods and services. It won&#39;t last.</p><p>The Treasury plans to increase debt issuance in coming months, which will boost the size of the TGA. The Fed will actively redeem T-bills when coupon maturities aren&#39;t sufficient to meet their monthly balance sheet reductions as part of QT, Garrib said.</p><p>The Treasury will be effectively taking money out of economy and putting it into the government&#39;s checking account -- a net drag -- as it issues more debt. That will put more pressure on the private sector to absorb those Treasurys, which means less money to put into other assets, he said.</p><p>The worry for stock-market investors is that high inflation means the Fed won&#39;t have the ability to pivot on a dime as it did during past periods of market stress, said Garrib, who argued that the tightening by the Fed and other major central banks could set up the stock market for a test of the June lows in a drop that could go &#34;significantly below&#34; those levels.</p><p>The main takeaway, he said, is &#34;don&#39;t fight the Fed on the way up and don&#39;t fight the Fed on the way down.&#34;</p><p>Stocks ended higher on Friday, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average , S&amp;P 500  and Nasdaq Composite  snapping a three-week run of weekly losses.</p><p>The highlight of the week ahead will likely come on Tuesday, with the release of the August consumer-price index, which will be parsed for signs inflation is heading back down.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Stock-Market Wild Card: What Investors Need to Know as Fed Shrinks Balance Sheet at Faster Pace</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nStock-Market Wild Card: What Investors Need to Know as Fed Shrinks Balance Sheet at Faster Pace\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-09-12 17:04</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>Quantitative easing is credited with juicing equity returns and boosting other speculative assets by flooding markets with liquidity as the Federal Reserve snapped up trillions of dollars in bonds after the financial crisis and amid the coronavirus pandemic. Investors and policy makers may be underestimating what happens as the tide goes out.</p><p>&#34;I don&#39;t know if the Fed or anybody else truly understands the impact of QT just yet,&#34; said Aidan Garrib, head of global macro strategy and research at Montreal-based PGM Global, in a phone interview.</p><p>The Fed, in fact, began slowly shrinking its balance sheet -- a process known as quantitative tightening, or QT -- earlier this year. Now it&#39;s accelerating the process, as planned, and it&#39;s making some market watchers nervous.</p><p>A lack of historical experience around the process is raising the uncertainty level. Meanwhile, research that increasingly credits quantitative easing, or QE, with giving asset prices a lift logically points to the potential for QT to do the opposite.</p><p>Since 2010, QE has explained about 50% of the movement in market price-to-earnings multiples, said Savita Subramanian, equity and quant strategist at Bank of America, in an Aug. 15 research note (see chart below).</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c7ba2d5fe717396f178495c88a6ba8f6\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"748\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>&#34;Based on the strong linear relationship between QE and S&amp;P 500 returns from 2010 to 2019, QT through 2023 would translate into a 7 percentage-point drop in the S&amp;P 500 from here,&#34; she wrote.</p><p>In quantitative easing, a central bank creates credit that&#39;s used to buy securities on the open market. Purchases of long-dated bonds are intended to drive down yields, which is seen enhancing appetite for risky assets as investors look elsewhere for higher returns. QE creates new reserves on bank balance sheets. The added cushion gives banks, which must hold reserves in line with regulations, more room to lend or to finance trading activity by hedge funds and other financial market participants, further enhancing market liquidity.</p><p>The way to think about the relationship between QE and equities is to note that as central banks undertake QE, it raises forward earnings expectations. That, in turn, lowers the equity risk premium, which is the extra return investors demand to hold risky equities over safe Treasurys, noted PGM Global&#39;s Garrib. Investors are willing to venture further out on the risk curve, he said, which explains the surge in earnings-free &#34;dream stocks&#34; and other highly speculative assets amid the QE flood as the economy and stock market recovered from the pandemic in 2021.</p><p>However, with the economy recovering and inflation rising the Fed began shrinking its balance sheet in June, and is doubling the pace in September to its maximum rate of $95 billion per month. This will be accomplished by letting $60 billion of Treasurys and $35 billion of mortgage backed securities roll off the balance sheet without reinvestment. At that pace, the balance sheet could shrink by $1 trillion in a year.</p><p>The unwinding of the Fed&#39;s balance sheet that began in 2017 after the economy had long recovered from the 2008-2009 crisis was supposed to be as exciting as &#34;watching paint dry,&#34; then-Federal Reserve Chairwoman Janet Yellen said at the time. It was a ho-hum affair until the fall of 2019, when the Fed had to inject cash into malfunctioning money markets. QE then resumed in 2020 in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p>More economists and analysts have been ringing alarm bells over the possibility of a repeat of the 2019 liquidity crunch.</p><p>&#34;If the past repeats, the shrinking of the central bank&#39;s balance sheet is not likely to be an entirely benign process and will require careful monitoring of the banking sector&#39;s on-and off-balance sheet demandable liabilities,&#34; warned Raghuram Rajan, former governor of the Reserve Bank of India and former chief economist at the International Monetary Fund, and other researchers in a paper presented at the Kansas City Fed&#39;s annual symposium in Jackson Hole, Wyoming, last month.</p><p>Hedge-fund giant Bridgewater Associates in June warned that QT was contributing to a &#34;liquidity hole&#34; in the bond market.</p><p>The slow pace of the wind-down so far and the composition of the balance-sheet reduction have muted the effect of QT so far, but that&#39;s set to change, Garrib said.</p><p>He noted that QT is usually described in the context of the asset side of the Fed&#39;s balance sheet, but it&#39;s the liability side that matters to financial markets. And so far, reductions in Fed liabilities have been concentrated in the Treasury General Account, or TGA, which effectively serves as the government&#39;s checking account.</p><p>That&#39;s actually served to improve market liquidity he explained, as it means the government has been spending money to pay for goods and services. It won&#39;t last.</p><p>The Treasury plans to increase debt issuance in coming months, which will boost the size of the TGA. The Fed will actively redeem T-bills when coupon maturities aren&#39;t sufficient to meet their monthly balance sheet reductions as part of QT, Garrib said.</p><p>The Treasury will be effectively taking money out of economy and putting it into the government&#39;s checking account -- a net drag -- as it issues more debt. That will put more pressure on the private sector to absorb those Treasurys, which means less money to put into other assets, he said.</p><p>The worry for stock-market investors is that high inflation means the Fed won&#39;t have the ability to pivot on a dime as it did during past periods of market stress, said Garrib, who argued that the tightening by the Fed and other major central banks could set up the stock market for a test of the June lows in a drop that could go &#34;significantly below&#34; those levels.</p><p>The main takeaway, he said, is &#34;don&#39;t fight the Fed on the way up and don&#39;t fight the Fed on the way down.&#34;</p><p>Stocks ended higher on Friday, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average , S&amp;P 500  and Nasdaq Composite  snapping a three-week run of weekly losses.</p><p>The highlight of the week ahead will likely come on Tuesday, with the release of the August consumer-price index, which will be parsed for signs inflation is heading back down.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2266390451","content_text":"Quantitative easing is credited with juicing equity returns and boosting other speculative assets by flooding markets with liquidity as the Federal Reserve snapped up trillions of dollars in bonds after the financial crisis and amid the coronavirus pandemic. Investors and policy makers may be underestimating what happens as the tide goes out.\"I don't know if the Fed or anybody else truly understands the impact of QT just yet,\" said Aidan Garrib, head of global macro strategy and research at Montreal-based PGM Global, in a phone interview.The Fed, in fact, began slowly shrinking its balance sheet -- a process known as quantitative tightening, or QT -- earlier this year. Now it's accelerating the process, as planned, and it's making some market watchers nervous.A lack of historical experience around the process is raising the uncertainty level. Meanwhile, research that increasingly credits quantitative easing, or QE, with giving asset prices a lift logically points to the potential for QT to do the opposite.Since 2010, QE has explained about 50% of the movement in market price-to-earnings multiples, said Savita Subramanian, equity and quant strategist at Bank of America, in an Aug. 15 research note (see chart below).\"Based on the strong linear relationship between QE and S&P 500 returns from 2010 to 2019, QT through 2023 would translate into a 7 percentage-point drop in the S&P 500 from here,\" she wrote.In quantitative easing, a central bank creates credit that's used to buy securities on the open market. Purchases of long-dated bonds are intended to drive down yields, which is seen enhancing appetite for risky assets as investors look elsewhere for higher returns. QE creates new reserves on bank balance sheets. The added cushion gives banks, which must hold reserves in line with regulations, more room to lend or to finance trading activity by hedge funds and other financial market participants, further enhancing market liquidity.The way to think about the relationship between QE and equities is to note that as central banks undertake QE, it raises forward earnings expectations. That, in turn, lowers the equity risk premium, which is the extra return investors demand to hold risky equities over safe Treasurys, noted PGM Global's Garrib. Investors are willing to venture further out on the risk curve, he said, which explains the surge in earnings-free \"dream stocks\" and other highly speculative assets amid the QE flood as the economy and stock market recovered from the pandemic in 2021.However, with the economy recovering and inflation rising the Fed began shrinking its balance sheet in June, and is doubling the pace in September to its maximum rate of $95 billion per month. This will be accomplished by letting $60 billion of Treasurys and $35 billion of mortgage backed securities roll off the balance sheet without reinvestment. At that pace, the balance sheet could shrink by $1 trillion in a year.The unwinding of the Fed's balance sheet that began in 2017 after the economy had long recovered from the 2008-2009 crisis was supposed to be as exciting as \"watching paint dry,\" then-Federal Reserve Chairwoman Janet Yellen said at the time. It was a ho-hum affair until the fall of 2019, when the Fed had to inject cash into malfunctioning money markets. QE then resumed in 2020 in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.More economists and analysts have been ringing alarm bells over the possibility of a repeat of the 2019 liquidity crunch.\"If the past repeats, the shrinking of the central bank's balance sheet is not likely to be an entirely benign process and will require careful monitoring of the banking sector's on-and off-balance sheet demandable liabilities,\" warned Raghuram Rajan, former governor of the Reserve Bank of India and former chief economist at the International Monetary Fund, and other researchers in a paper presented at the Kansas City Fed's annual symposium in Jackson Hole, Wyoming, last month.Hedge-fund giant Bridgewater Associates in June warned that QT was contributing to a \"liquidity hole\" in the bond market.The slow pace of the wind-down so far and the composition of the balance-sheet reduction have muted the effect of QT so far, but that's set to change, Garrib said.He noted that QT is usually described in the context of the asset side of the Fed's balance sheet, but it's the liability side that matters to financial markets. And so far, reductions in Fed liabilities have been concentrated in the Treasury General Account, or TGA, which effectively serves as the government's checking account.That's actually served to improve market liquidity he explained, as it means the government has been spending money to pay for goods and services. It won't last.The Treasury plans to increase debt issuance in coming months, which will boost the size of the TGA. The Fed will actively redeem T-bills when coupon maturities aren't sufficient to meet their monthly balance sheet reductions as part of QT, Garrib said.The Treasury will be effectively taking money out of economy and putting it into the government's checking account -- a net drag -- as it issues more debt. That will put more pressure on the private sector to absorb those Treasurys, which means less money to put into other assets, he said.The worry for stock-market investors is that high inflation means the Fed won't have the ability to pivot on a dime as it did during past periods of market stress, said Garrib, who argued that the tightening by the Fed and other major central banks could set up the stock market for a test of the June lows in a drop that could go \"significantly below\" those levels.The main takeaway, he said, is \"don't fight the Fed on the way up and don't fight the Fed on the way down.\"Stocks ended higher on Friday, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average , S&P 500  and Nasdaq Composite  snapping a three-week run of weekly losses.The highlight of the week ahead will likely come on Tuesday, with the release of the August consumer-price index, which will be parsed for signs inflation is heading back down.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":73,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9040591017,"gmtCreate":1655683990639,"gmtModify":1676535683494,"author":{"id":"3577409082356068","authorId":"3577409082356068","name":"babiboo","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8be2f9f25874d7f974661428b042a2e7","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577409082356068","authorIdStr":"3577409082356068"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/CY6U.SI\">$ASCENDAS INDIA TRUST(CY6U.SI)$</a>nooooo","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/CY6U.SI\">$ASCENDAS INDIA TRUST(CY6U.SI)$</a>nooooo","text":"$ASCENDAS INDIA TRUST(CY6U.SI)$nooooo","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/9ccc5370141fec62c8dff281972effd0","width":"1080","height":"1920"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9040591017","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":212,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9059692626,"gmtCreate":1654349519765,"gmtModify":1676535434650,"author":{"id":"3577409082356068","authorId":"3577409082356068","name":"babiboo","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8be2f9f25874d7f974661428b042a2e7","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577409082356068","authorIdStr":"3577409082356068"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/TIGR\">$Tiger Brokers(TIGR)$</a>sadeddd","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/TIGR\">$Tiger Brokers(TIGR)$</a>sadeddd","text":"$Tiger Brokers(TIGR)$sadeddd","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/589515a1e2c1b1daa769f3eac8b6739c","width":"1080","height":"1920"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9059692626","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":72,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9022430930,"gmtCreate":1653565109020,"gmtModify":1676535304607,"author":{"id":"3577409082356068","authorId":"3577409082356068","name":"babiboo","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8be2f9f25874d7f974661428b042a2e7","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577409082356068","authorIdStr":"3577409082356068"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Wow ya","listText":"Wow ya","text":"Wow ya","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9022430930","repostId":"1142955219","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1142955219","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1653562871,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1142955219?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-05-26 19:01","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Macy's Raises Full-Year Profit Forecast","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1142955219","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Macy's Inc raised its full-year profit forecast on Thursday, helped by strong demand for apparel fro","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Macy&#39;s Inc raised its full-year profit forecast on Thursday, helped by strong demand for apparel from consumers returning to work and social events, even as red-hot inflation saps consumer spending power for discretionary products.</p><p>The company said it expects fiscal 2022 adjusted earnings per share of $4.53 to $4.95, compared with its previous forecast of $4.13 to $4.52.</p><p>Macy&#39;s shares jumped 15% after reporting quarterly results.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/286a2fd2ac841b84fe4829688c3f3a50\" tg-width=\"872\" tg-height=\"619\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p></p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Macy's Raises Full-Year Profit Forecast</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nMacy's Raises Full-Year Profit Forecast\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-05-26 19:01</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>Macy&#39;s Inc raised its full-year profit forecast on Thursday, helped by strong demand for apparel from consumers returning to work and social events, even as red-hot inflation saps consumer spending power for discretionary products.</p><p>The company said it expects fiscal 2022 adjusted earnings per share of $4.53 to $4.95, compared with its previous forecast of $4.13 to $4.52.</p><p>Macy&#39;s shares jumped 15% after reporting quarterly results.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/286a2fd2ac841b84fe4829688c3f3a50\" tg-width=\"872\" tg-height=\"619\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p></p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"M":"梅西百货"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1142955219","content_text":"Macy's Inc raised its full-year profit forecast on Thursday, helped by strong demand for apparel from consumers returning to work and social events, even as red-hot inflation saps consumer spending power for discretionary products.The company said it expects fiscal 2022 adjusted earnings per share of $4.53 to $4.95, compared with its previous forecast of $4.13 to $4.52.Macy's shares jumped 15% after reporting quarterly results.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":37,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}