n57tpt9U2 personal page - To The Moon

n57tpt9U2

n57tpt9U2

No personal profile

61Follow

2Followers

0Topic

0Badge

2021-03-22

Good...

U.S. senators press Biden to set end date for gas-powered car sales

2021-03-16

Good to know.............

Apple's iPhone 12, iPhone 12 Pro Trail Android Rivals In 5G Speeds: Report

2021-03-16

Good

China shares rise as consumer firms regain footing

2021-03-15

Up up up

Nio Stock Looks as if It Is Going to Stay Volatile for a While

2021-03-12

Wow

Shell Reveals Oil-Trading Profit Doubled to $2.6 Billion in 2020

2021-03-12

Good

Don’t be fooled by the ‘value’ tag on these tech stocks. Many can provide plenty of growth too

Go to Tiger App to see more news

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"userPageInfo":{"id":"3577498455923590","uuid":"3577498455923590","gmtCreate":1614404432148,"gmtModify":1615468266279,"name":"n57tpt9U2","pinyin":"n57tpt9u2","introduction":"","introductionEn":null,"signature":"","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0796a20219fda5104c45929cfeb79aa8","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":2,"headSize":61,"tweetSize":8,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":0,"name":"","nameTw":"","represent":"","factor":"","iconColor":"","bgColor":""},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":"success","userBadges":[{"badgeId":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493-2","templateUuid":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493","name":"Senior Tiger","description":"Join the tiger community for 1000 days","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0063fb68ea29c9ae6858c58630e182d5","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/96c699a93be4214d4b49aea6a5a5d1a4","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/35b0e542a9ff77046ed69ef602bc105d","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.11.27","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789-1","templateUuid":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789","name":"Knowledgeable Investor","description":"Traded more than 10 stocks","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e74cc24115c4fbae6154ec1b1041bf47","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d48265cbfd97c57f9048db29f22227b0","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76c6d6898b073c77e1c537ebe9ac1c57","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1102},{"badgeId":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84-1","templateUuid":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84","name":"Real Trader","description":"Completed a transaction","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100},{"badgeId":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be-1","templateUuid":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be","name":"Elite Trader","description":"Total number of securities or futures transactions reached 30","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ab0f87127c854ce3191a752d57b46edc","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c9835ce48b8c8743566d344ac7a7ba8c","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76754b53ce7a90019f132c1d2fbc698f","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":"60.52%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":4,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":null,"starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"post","tweets":[{"id":359566776,"gmtCreate":1616414141795,"gmtModify":1704793715018,"author":{"id":"3577498455923590","authorId":"3577498455923590","name":"n57tpt9U2","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0796a20219fda5104c45929cfeb79aa8","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577498455923590","authorIdStr":"3577498455923590"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good...","listText":"Good...","text":"Good...","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/359566776","repostId":"2121124923","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2121124923","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1616412000,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2121124923?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-03-22 19:20","market":"us","language":"en","title":"U.S. senators press Biden to set end date for gas-powered car sales","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2121124923","media":"Reuters","summary":"WASHINGTON  -  California's two U.S. senators are urging President Joe Biden to set a firm date to phase-out gas-powered passenger vehicles as the White House grapples with how to rewrite vehicle emissions rules slashed under President Donald Trump.In an unreported letter going to Biden Monday, Democratic Senators Alex Padilla and Dianne Feinstein called on Biden \"to follow California’s lead and set a date by which all new cars and passenger trucks sold be zero-emission vehicles.\" They also urge","content":"<p>WASHINGTON (Reuters) -  California's two U.S. senators are urging President Joe Biden to set a firm date to phase-out gas-powered passenger vehicles as the White House grapples with how to rewrite vehicle emissions rules slashed under President Donald Trump.</p><p>In an unreported letter going to Biden Monday, Democratic Senators Alex Padilla and Dianne Feinstein called on Biden \"to follow California’s lead and set a date by which all new cars and passenger trucks sold be zero-emission vehicles.\" They also urged Biden to restore California's authority to set clean car standards.</p><p>In September, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed an executive order directing the state's air resources agency to require all new cars and passenger trucks sold in California to be zero-emission by 2035.</p><p>Biden's campaign in 2020 declined to endorse a specific date to end gas-powered vehicle sales, but he has vowed to dramatically boost electric vehicles and charging stations.</p><p>In January, Biden said the administration would replace the federal government's fleet of 650,000 vehicles \"with clean electric vehicles made right here in America made by American workers.\"</p><p>The senators also say Biden should use a compromise deal that California struck with automakers including Ford Motor Co, Honda Motor, BMW AG and Volkswagen AG that falls between the Trump administration and Obama-era requirements.</p><p>\"We believe the national baseline should, at an absolute minimum, be built around the technical lead set by companies that voluntarily advanced their agreements with California,\" Padilla, who replaced Vice President Kamala Harris in the Senate, and Feinstein wrote in the letter seen by Reuters. \"California and other states need a strong federal partner.\"</p><p>Shortly after taking office, Biden ordered U.S. agencies to revisit fuel efficiency standards by July.</p><p>The Trump administration in March 2020 finalized a rollback of fuel economy standards to require 1.5% annual increases in efficiency through 2026, well below the 5% yearly boosts in Obama-administration rules it discarded.</p><p>Then President Donald Trump repeatedly targeted California, a Democratic bastion that tangled with Trump on multiple fronts during his tenure.</p><p>The Center for Biological Diversity estimates the California deal improves fuel economy 3.7% year over year between 2022-2026.</p><p>Biden also directed the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration by April to reconsider Trump’s 2019 decision to revoke California’s authority to set its own auto tailpipe emissions standards and require rising numbers of zero-emission vehicles.</p><p>A White House spokesman declined to comment Sunday on the timing of any announcement on California's vehicle authority.</p><p>California's vehicle emissions standards are followed by 13 other states and the District of Columbia accounting for more than 40% of the U.S. population.</p><p>In January, General Motors said it aspires to end all gasoline passenger car and truck sales by 2035. Volvo, a unit of Zhejiang Geely Holding Group, said its entire car line-up will be fully electric by 2030 and Ford's European lineup will also be fully electric by 2030.</p><p>The Alliance for Automotive Innovation, a trade group representing major automakers, declined comment Sunday but last month backed nationwide rules to achieve vehicle emissions reductions roughly midway between the Trump and Obama standards.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>U.S. senators press Biden to set end date for gas-powered car sales</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nU.S. senators press Biden to set end date for gas-powered car sales\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-03-22 19:20</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>WASHINGTON (Reuters) -  California's two U.S. senators are urging President Joe Biden to set a firm date to phase-out gas-powered passenger vehicles as the White House grapples with how to rewrite vehicle emissions rules slashed under President Donald Trump.</p><p>In an unreported letter going to Biden Monday, Democratic Senators Alex Padilla and Dianne Feinstein called on Biden \"to follow California’s lead and set a date by which all new cars and passenger trucks sold be zero-emission vehicles.\" They also urged Biden to restore California's authority to set clean car standards.</p><p>In September, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed an executive order directing the state's air resources agency to require all new cars and passenger trucks sold in California to be zero-emission by 2035.</p><p>Biden's campaign in 2020 declined to endorse a specific date to end gas-powered vehicle sales, but he has vowed to dramatically boost electric vehicles and charging stations.</p><p>In January, Biden said the administration would replace the federal government's fleet of 650,000 vehicles \"with clean electric vehicles made right here in America made by American workers.\"</p><p>The senators also say Biden should use a compromise deal that California struck with automakers including Ford Motor Co, Honda Motor, BMW AG and Volkswagen AG that falls between the Trump administration and Obama-era requirements.</p><p>\"We believe the national baseline should, at an absolute minimum, be built around the technical lead set by companies that voluntarily advanced their agreements with California,\" Padilla, who replaced Vice President Kamala Harris in the Senate, and Feinstein wrote in the letter seen by Reuters. \"California and other states need a strong federal partner.\"</p><p>Shortly after taking office, Biden ordered U.S. agencies to revisit fuel efficiency standards by July.</p><p>The Trump administration in March 2020 finalized a rollback of fuel economy standards to require 1.5% annual increases in efficiency through 2026, well below the 5% yearly boosts in Obama-administration rules it discarded.</p><p>Then President Donald Trump repeatedly targeted California, a Democratic bastion that tangled with Trump on multiple fronts during his tenure.</p><p>The Center for Biological Diversity estimates the California deal improves fuel economy 3.7% year over year between 2022-2026.</p><p>Biden also directed the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration by April to reconsider Trump’s 2019 decision to revoke California’s authority to set its own auto tailpipe emissions standards and require rising numbers of zero-emission vehicles.</p><p>A White House spokesman declined to comment Sunday on the timing of any announcement on California's vehicle authority.</p><p>California's vehicle emissions standards are followed by 13 other states and the District of Columbia accounting for more than 40% of the U.S. population.</p><p>In January, General Motors said it aspires to end all gasoline passenger car and truck sales by 2035. Volvo, a unit of Zhejiang Geely Holding Group, said its entire car line-up will be fully electric by 2030 and Ford's European lineup will also be fully electric by 2030.</p><p>The Alliance for Automotive Innovation, a trade group representing major automakers, declined comment Sunday but last month backed nationwide rules to achieve vehicle emissions reductions roughly midway between the Trump and Obama standards.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"F":"福特汽车","GM":"通用汽车","TSLA":"特斯拉"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2121124923","content_text":"WASHINGTON (Reuters) -  California's two U.S. senators are urging President Joe Biden to set a firm date to phase-out gas-powered passenger vehicles as the White House grapples with how to rewrite vehicle emissions rules slashed under President Donald Trump.In an unreported letter going to Biden Monday, Democratic Senators Alex Padilla and Dianne Feinstein called on Biden \"to follow California’s lead and set a date by which all new cars and passenger trucks sold be zero-emission vehicles.\" They also urged Biden to restore California's authority to set clean car standards.In September, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed an executive order directing the state's air resources agency to require all new cars and passenger trucks sold in California to be zero-emission by 2035.Biden's campaign in 2020 declined to endorse a specific date to end gas-powered vehicle sales, but he has vowed to dramatically boost electric vehicles and charging stations.In January, Biden said the administration would replace the federal government's fleet of 650,000 vehicles \"with clean electric vehicles made right here in America made by American workers.\"The senators also say Biden should use a compromise deal that California struck with automakers including Ford Motor Co, Honda Motor, BMW AG and Volkswagen AG that falls between the Trump administration and Obama-era requirements.\"We believe the national baseline should, at an absolute minimum, be built around the technical lead set by companies that voluntarily advanced their agreements with California,\" Padilla, who replaced Vice President Kamala Harris in the Senate, and Feinstein wrote in the letter seen by Reuters. \"California and other states need a strong federal partner.\"Shortly after taking office, Biden ordered U.S. agencies to revisit fuel efficiency standards by July.The Trump administration in March 2020 finalized a rollback of fuel economy standards to require 1.5% annual increases in efficiency through 2026, well below the 5% yearly boosts in Obama-administration rules it discarded.Then President Donald Trump repeatedly targeted California, a Democratic bastion that tangled with Trump on multiple fronts during his tenure.The Center for Biological Diversity estimates the California deal improves fuel economy 3.7% year over year between 2022-2026.Biden also directed the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration by April to reconsider Trump’s 2019 decision to revoke California’s authority to set its own auto tailpipe emissions standards and require rising numbers of zero-emission vehicles.A White House spokesman declined to comment Sunday on the timing of any announcement on California's vehicle authority.California's vehicle emissions standards are followed by 13 other states and the District of Columbia accounting for more than 40% of the U.S. population.In January, General Motors said it aspires to end all gasoline passenger car and truck sales by 2035. Volvo, a unit of Zhejiang Geely Holding Group, said its entire car line-up will be fully electric by 2030 and Ford's European lineup will also be fully electric by 2030.The Alliance for Automotive Innovation, a trade group representing major automakers, declined comment Sunday but last month backed nationwide rules to achieve vehicle emissions reductions roughly midway between the Trump and Obama standards.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":349,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":325612938,"gmtCreate":1615893654724,"gmtModify":1704788048870,"author":{"id":"3577498455923590","authorId":"3577498455923590","name":"n57tpt9U2","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0796a20219fda5104c45929cfeb79aa8","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577498455923590","authorIdStr":"3577498455923590"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good to know.............","listText":"Good to know.............","text":"Good to know.............","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/325612938","repostId":"1163228495","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1163228495","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1615885336,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1163228495?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-03-16 17:02","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple's iPhone 12, iPhone 12 Pro Trail Android Rivals In 5G Speeds: Report","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1163228495","media":"Benzinga","summary":"Apple Inc.’s  iPhone 12 lineup continues to lag behind its Android-based rivals in terms of 5G perfo","content":"<p><b>Apple Inc.’s</b>&nbsp;&nbsp;iPhone 12 lineup continues to lag behind its Android-based rivals in terms of 5G performance, according to a report from Opensignal.</p><p><b>What Happened:</b>&nbsp;Apple’s first-ever 5 G-enabled smartphones are ranked lower than at least 25 smartphones running<b>Alphabet Inc.’s</b>GOOGGOOGLAndroid operating system for overall download speed, as per the report.</p><p><b>Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.</b>&nbsp;OTCSSNLFaccounted for at least 60% of the top 25 5G smartphones that were ranked based on their average 5G or 4G download speeds. Samsung’s new Galaxy S21 5G, powered by&nbsp;<b>Qualcomm Inc.</b>&nbsp;Snapdragon 888, took the top spot with an average download speed of 56 Mbps.</p><p><b>TCL Electronics Holdings Limited’s</b>&nbsp;&nbsp;Revvl 5G and the OnePlus 8T+ took the second and third spots, with download speeds of 49.8 Mbps and 49.3 Mbps, respectively. The LG Velvet 5G was in 25th place with a download speed of 37.8 Mbps.</p><p>In comparison, the iPhone 12 Pro and iPhone 12 Pro Max had average download speeds of 36.9 and 36.2 Mbps, while the iPhone 12 and iPhone 12 mini clocked speeds of 29.6 and 32.9 Mbps, respectively.</p><p>However, the Apple devices had overall download speeds 2.3 times faster than their 4G iPhone counterparts that used older Intel modems, according to the report. In addition, the average download speeds on the 5G iPhone Pro models are 36% faster than the speeds on the most recent cellular iPad Pro models that are limited to 4G.</p><p><b>Why It Matters:</b>&nbsp;While the iPhone 12 models have been successful for Apple and helped the tech giant toreportbetter-than-expected first-quarter results earlier this year, the lineup’sbattery performancehas also fallen short.</p><p>The iPhone 12 is Apple’s first 5G device, while Samsung’s smartphones are the third generation of 5G devices.</p><p><b>Price Action:</b>&nbsp;Apple shares closed almost 2.5% higher on Monday at $123.99.</p>","source":"lsy1606299360108","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple's iPhone 12, iPhone 12 Pro Trail Android Rivals In 5G Speeds: Report</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple's iPhone 12, iPhone 12 Pro Trail Android Rivals In 5G Speeds: Report\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-03-16 17:02 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.benzinga.com/news/21/03/20182901/apples-iphone-12-iphone-12-pro-trail-android-rivals-in-5g-speeds-report><strong>Benzinga</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Apple Inc.’s  iPhone 12 lineup continues to lag behind its Android-based rivals in terms of 5G performance, according to a report from Opensignal.What Happened: Apple’s first-ever 5 G-enabled ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.benzinga.com/news/21/03/20182901/apples-iphone-12-iphone-12-pro-trail-android-rivals-in-5g-speeds-report\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://www.benzinga.com/news/21/03/20182901/apples-iphone-12-iphone-12-pro-trail-android-rivals-in-5g-speeds-report","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1163228495","content_text":"Apple Inc.’s  iPhone 12 lineup continues to lag behind its Android-based rivals in terms of 5G performance, according to a report from Opensignal.What Happened: Apple’s first-ever 5 G-enabled smartphones are ranked lower than at least 25 smartphones runningAlphabet Inc.’sGOOGGOOGLAndroid operating system for overall download speed, as per the report.Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. OTCSSNLFaccounted for at least 60% of the top 25 5G smartphones that were ranked based on their average 5G or 4G download speeds. Samsung’s new Galaxy S21 5G, powered by Qualcomm Inc. Snapdragon 888, took the top spot with an average download speed of 56 Mbps.TCL Electronics Holdings Limited’s  Revvl 5G and the OnePlus 8T+ took the second and third spots, with download speeds of 49.8 Mbps and 49.3 Mbps, respectively. The LG Velvet 5G was in 25th place with a download speed of 37.8 Mbps.In comparison, the iPhone 12 Pro and iPhone 12 Pro Max had average download speeds of 36.9 and 36.2 Mbps, while the iPhone 12 and iPhone 12 mini clocked speeds of 29.6 and 32.9 Mbps, respectively.However, the Apple devices had overall download speeds 2.3 times faster than their 4G iPhone counterparts that used older Intel modems, according to the report. In addition, the average download speeds on the 5G iPhone Pro models are 36% faster than the speeds on the most recent cellular iPad Pro models that are limited to 4G.Why It Matters: While the iPhone 12 models have been successful for Apple and helped the tech giant toreportbetter-than-expected first-quarter results earlier this year, the lineup’sbattery performancehas also fallen short.The iPhone 12 is Apple’s first 5G device, while Samsung’s smartphones are the third generation of 5G devices.Price Action: Apple shares closed almost 2.5% higher on Monday at $123.99.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":413,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":325145644,"gmtCreate":1615881527988,"gmtModify":1704787847984,"author":{"id":"3577498455923590","authorId":"3577498455923590","name":"n57tpt9U2","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0796a20219fda5104c45929cfeb79aa8","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577498455923590","authorIdStr":"3577498455923590"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/325145644","repostId":"2119293429","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2119293429","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1615880132,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2119293429?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-03-16 15:35","market":"sh","language":"en","title":"China shares rise as consumer firms regain footing","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2119293429","media":"Reuters","summary":"SHANGHAI, March 16 (Reuters) - Chinese shares finished higher on Tuesday, edging up from the previou","content":"<p>SHANGHAI, March 16 (Reuters) - Chinese shares finished higher on Tuesday, edging up from the previous day's slump as consumer and financial firms recovered, but broader gains were limited by investor wariness over possible policy tightening.</p>\n<p>At the close, the blue-chip CSI300 index was up 0.87%, after slumping more than 2% on Monday. The Shanghai Composite index was up 0.78% at 3,446.73.</p>\n<p>The consumer staples sector rose 2.05% after falling 2.2% a day earlier. The financial sector subindex&nbsp;rose 1.21%, real estate firms jumped 3.73% and the healthcare subindex added 0.96%.</p>\n<p>But with a conservative economic growth target this year widely viewed as giving regulators more room to cut back on pandemic-era stimulus, market players see little room for a strong rally.</p>\n<p>\"We are in this vortex... a vacuum of any catalyst that actually means anything directional or sentiment-wise to the market,\" said Andy Maynard, head of equities at China Renaissance in Hong Kong. \"Without a catalyst... we're not going anywhere. In fact, we're just going to probably drift lower.\"</p>\n<p>The smaller Shenzhen index ended up 1% and the start-up board ChiNext Composite index rose 1.06%.</p>\n<p>Around the region, MSCI's Asia ex-Japan stock index&nbsp;was firmer by 0.72%, while Japan's Nikkei index&nbsp;closed 0.52% higher.</p>\n<p>At 0700 GMT, the yuan was quoted at 6.4986 per U.S. dollar, 0.03% firmer than the previous close of 6.5006.</p>\n<p>So far this year, the Shanghai stock index is down 0.8% and the CSI300 has fallen 2.5%, while China's H-share index listed in Hong Kong is up 5.5%. Shanghai stocks have declined 1.78% this month.</p>\n<p>As of 0701 GMT, China's A-shares were trading at a premium of 34.72% over the Hong Kong-listed H-shares.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>China shares rise as consumer firms regain footing</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nChina shares rise as consumer firms regain footing\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-03-16 15:35</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>SHANGHAI, March 16 (Reuters) - Chinese shares finished higher on Tuesday, edging up from the previous day's slump as consumer and financial firms recovered, but broader gains were limited by investor wariness over possible policy tightening.</p>\n<p>At the close, the blue-chip CSI300 index was up 0.87%, after slumping more than 2% on Monday. The Shanghai Composite index was up 0.78% at 3,446.73.</p>\n<p>The consumer staples sector rose 2.05% after falling 2.2% a day earlier. The financial sector subindex&nbsp;rose 1.21%, real estate firms jumped 3.73% and the healthcare subindex added 0.96%.</p>\n<p>But with a conservative economic growth target this year widely viewed as giving regulators more room to cut back on pandemic-era stimulus, market players see little room for a strong rally.</p>\n<p>\"We are in this vortex... a vacuum of any catalyst that actually means anything directional or sentiment-wise to the market,\" said Andy Maynard, head of equities at China Renaissance in Hong Kong. \"Without a catalyst... we're not going anywhere. In fact, we're just going to probably drift lower.\"</p>\n<p>The smaller Shenzhen index ended up 1% and the start-up board ChiNext Composite index rose 1.06%.</p>\n<p>Around the region, MSCI's Asia ex-Japan stock index&nbsp;was firmer by 0.72%, while Japan's Nikkei index&nbsp;closed 0.52% higher.</p>\n<p>At 0700 GMT, the yuan was quoted at 6.4986 per U.S. dollar, 0.03% firmer than the previous close of 6.5006.</p>\n<p>So far this year, the Shanghai stock index is down 0.8% and the CSI300 has fallen 2.5%, while China's H-share index listed in Hong Kong is up 5.5%. Shanghai stocks have declined 1.78% this month.</p>\n<p>As of 0701 GMT, China's A-shares were trading at a premium of 34.72% over the Hong Kong-listed H-shares.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"399001":"深证成指","399006":"创业板指","000001.SH":"上证指数"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2119293429","content_text":"SHANGHAI, March 16 (Reuters) - Chinese shares finished higher on Tuesday, edging up from the previous day's slump as consumer and financial firms recovered, but broader gains were limited by investor wariness over possible policy tightening.\nAt the close, the blue-chip CSI300 index was up 0.87%, after slumping more than 2% on Monday. The Shanghai Composite index was up 0.78% at 3,446.73.\nThe consumer staples sector rose 2.05% after falling 2.2% a day earlier. The financial sector subindex rose 1.21%, real estate firms jumped 3.73% and the healthcare subindex added 0.96%.\nBut with a conservative economic growth target this year widely viewed as giving regulators more room to cut back on pandemic-era stimulus, market players see little room for a strong rally.\n\"We are in this vortex... a vacuum of any catalyst that actually means anything directional or sentiment-wise to the market,\" said Andy Maynard, head of equities at China Renaissance in Hong Kong. \"Without a catalyst... we're not going anywhere. In fact, we're just going to probably drift lower.\"\nThe smaller Shenzhen index ended up 1% and the start-up board ChiNext Composite index rose 1.06%.\nAround the region, MSCI's Asia ex-Japan stock index was firmer by 0.72%, while Japan's Nikkei index closed 0.52% higher.\nAt 0700 GMT, the yuan was quoted at 6.4986 per U.S. dollar, 0.03% firmer than the previous close of 6.5006.\nSo far this year, the Shanghai stock index is down 0.8% and the CSI300 has fallen 2.5%, while China's H-share index listed in Hong Kong is up 5.5%. Shanghai stocks have declined 1.78% this month.\nAs of 0701 GMT, China's A-shares were trading at a premium of 34.72% over the Hong Kong-listed H-shares.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":381,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":322852378,"gmtCreate":1615797754994,"gmtModify":1704786609546,"author":{"id":"3577498455923590","authorId":"3577498455923590","name":"n57tpt9U2","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0796a20219fda5104c45929cfeb79aa8","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577498455923590","authorIdStr":"3577498455923590"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Up up up","listText":"Up up up","text":"Up up up","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/322852378","repostId":"1147986042","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1147986042","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1615796815,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1147986042?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-03-15 16:26","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Nio Stock Looks as if It Is Going to Stay Volatile for a While","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1147986042","media":"InvestorPlace","summary":"The warning lights are still flashing on Nio stockNio (NYSE:NIO) stock has been decelerating lately.","content":"<p>The warning lights are still flashing on Nio stock</p><p><b>Nio</b>&nbsp;(NYSE:<b><u>NIO</u></b>) stock has been decelerating lately. Since early February, the shares have plunged from $60 to $45 — putting the market capitalization at $72 billion.&nbsp;Of course, NIO stock is still well above its low for the past 52 weeks, which was a mere $2 per share.</p><p>The fact is that this Chinese electric car operator has been able to pull off a stellar turnaround.&nbsp; Another catalyst has been the rebound in the economy.</p><p>Yet the EV (Electric Vehicle) sector is going through a re-assessment from Wall Street. Of course, there has been tremendous selling pressure on other companies like&nbsp;<b>Tesla</b>&nbsp;(NASDAQ:<b><u>TSLA</u></b>),<b>Xpeng</b>&nbsp;(NYSE:<b><u>XPEV</u></b>) and&nbsp;<b>Li Auto</b>&nbsp;(NASDAQ:<b><u>LI</u></b>).</p><p>OK then, what’s next? Could this be a buying opportunity? Or should investors hold off on NIO stock for now?</p><p>Here’s a look:</p><p><b>The Fundamentals and NIO Stock</b></p><p>Nio certainly had a robust fourth quarter. Revenues soared by 148% to $1.02 billion and the net loss was 14 cents a share, compared to a loss of 39 cents a share in the same period a year ago. The gross margin swung from -8.9% to 17.2%.</p><p>In terms of the balance sheet, it got stronger as well. The cash balance went from&nbsp;$3.3 billion to $6.5 billion on a sequential basis. The company was smart to raise some capital when NIO stock was surging.</p><p>But of course, expectations were extremely positive going into the earnings report. Thus, it really should not be any surprise that there was disappointment on Wall Street.</p><p><b>The Issues</b></p><p>Now there was something in the report that was a red flag – that is, the deliveries for January came in over 7,200. This was below the 7,400 needed to hit its quarterly objectives.</p><p>One reason for this could be the Lunar New Year holiday, in which a large part of the China essentially shuts down. But there may be another factor at work:&nbsp; the global shortage of semiconductors.</p><p>“The&nbsp;chip shortage&nbsp;which has impacted the overall global auto industry, as well as Tesla’s recent price cuts, have dented some positive market dynamics for NIO …although we believe this will be short-lived,” said Wedbush analyst Dan Ives.</p><p>But how long? It’s far from clear. But there are indications it could last throughout the year. And since Nio relies on third-party manufacturing, this could put the company at more risk.</p><p>Despite all this, Ives is still bullish on Nio stock as are a myriad of other Wall Street analysts. According to&nbsp;Tipranks.com, the average price target is $68, which assumes 79% upside from current levels.</p><p><b>Bottom Line on Nio Stock</b></p><p>The past year has definitely been an inflection point for Nio. The company was able to deal with its quality problems and ramp production.</p><p>Nio was also able to introduce some innovations. For example,&nbsp;in early January the company launched its ET7 vehicle, which is a sedan. It has a sleek design, strong performance and full-stack autonomous driving systems. And yes, the reception has been particularly strong.</p><p>The company has also been innovative with its business model. To this end, it sells its batteries on a subscription basis, which should provide a nice recurring revenue stream. The same will go for its AI systems.</p><p>However, in terms of NIO stock, I actually still think there should be caution. Even with the drop-off, the valuation is far from cheap. Consider that Nio stock is trading at roughly 20 times revenues. This is steep for a capital-intensive company.</p><p>For the most part, it seems a better approach is to be patient on this one, such as until there is more stability in the stock price.</p>","source":"lsy1606302653667","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Nio Stock Looks as if It Is Going to Stay Volatile for a While</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nNio Stock Looks as if It Is Going to Stay Volatile for a While\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-03-15 16:26 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://investorplace.com/2021/03/nio-stock-volatile-for-a-while/><strong>InvestorPlace</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The warning lights are still flashing on Nio stockNio (NYSE:NIO) stock has been decelerating lately. Since early February, the shares have plunged from $60 to $45 — putting the market capitalization ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://investorplace.com/2021/03/nio-stock-volatile-for-a-while/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NIO":"蔚来"},"source_url":"https://investorplace.com/2021/03/nio-stock-volatile-for-a-while/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1147986042","content_text":"The warning lights are still flashing on Nio stockNio (NYSE:NIO) stock has been decelerating lately. Since early February, the shares have plunged from $60 to $45 — putting the market capitalization at $72 billion. Of course, NIO stock is still well above its low for the past 52 weeks, which was a mere $2 per share.The fact is that this Chinese electric car operator has been able to pull off a stellar turnaround.  Another catalyst has been the rebound in the economy.Yet the EV (Electric Vehicle) sector is going through a re-assessment from Wall Street. Of course, there has been tremendous selling pressure on other companies like Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA),Xpeng (NYSE:XPEV) and Li Auto (NASDAQ:LI).OK then, what’s next? Could this be a buying opportunity? Or should investors hold off on NIO stock for now?Here’s a look:The Fundamentals and NIO StockNio certainly had a robust fourth quarter. Revenues soared by 148% to $1.02 billion and the net loss was 14 cents a share, compared to a loss of 39 cents a share in the same period a year ago. The gross margin swung from -8.9% to 17.2%.In terms of the balance sheet, it got stronger as well. The cash balance went from $3.3 billion to $6.5 billion on a sequential basis. The company was smart to raise some capital when NIO stock was surging.But of course, expectations were extremely positive going into the earnings report. Thus, it really should not be any surprise that there was disappointment on Wall Street.The IssuesNow there was something in the report that was a red flag – that is, the deliveries for January came in over 7,200. This was below the 7,400 needed to hit its quarterly objectives.One reason for this could be the Lunar New Year holiday, in which a large part of the China essentially shuts down. But there may be another factor at work:  the global shortage of semiconductors.“The chip shortage which has impacted the overall global auto industry, as well as Tesla’s recent price cuts, have dented some positive market dynamics for NIO …although we believe this will be short-lived,” said Wedbush analyst Dan Ives.But how long? It’s far from clear. But there are indications it could last throughout the year. And since Nio relies on third-party manufacturing, this could put the company at more risk.Despite all this, Ives is still bullish on Nio stock as are a myriad of other Wall Street analysts. According to Tipranks.com, the average price target is $68, which assumes 79% upside from current levels.Bottom Line on Nio StockThe past year has definitely been an inflection point for Nio. The company was able to deal with its quality problems and ramp production.Nio was also able to introduce some innovations. For example, in early January the company launched its ET7 vehicle, which is a sedan. It has a sleek design, strong performance and full-stack autonomous driving systems. And yes, the reception has been particularly strong.The company has also been innovative with its business model. To this end, it sells its batteries on a subscription basis, which should provide a nice recurring revenue stream. The same will go for its AI systems.However, in terms of NIO stock, I actually still think there should be caution. Even with the drop-off, the valuation is far from cheap. Consider that Nio stock is trading at roughly 20 times revenues. This is steep for a capital-intensive company.For the most part, it seems a better approach is to be patient on this one, such as until there is more stability in the stock price.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":514,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":328494926,"gmtCreate":1615547534365,"gmtModify":1704784395481,"author":{"id":"3577498455923590","authorId":"3577498455923590","name":"n57tpt9U2","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0796a20219fda5104c45929cfeb79aa8","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577498455923590","authorIdStr":"3577498455923590"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Wow","listText":"Wow","text":"Wow","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/328494926","repostId":"1158535571","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1158535571","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1615542310,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1158535571?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-03-12 17:45","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Shell Reveals Oil-Trading Profit Doubled to $2.6 Billion in 2020","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1158535571","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"Royal Dutch Shell Plcdis closed the profitability of its sprawling and secretive oil trading unit fo","content":"<p>Royal Dutch Shell Plcdis&nbsp;closed the profitability of its sprawling and secretive oil trading unit for the first time, saying it almost doubled to $2.6 billion.</p>\n<p>The scale of the earnings show the importance of the business to the company in a year that weak demand and prices hit other parts of the business. Shell took advantage of wild price swings and a market situation that allowed it to make money by storing oil to sell it later for a profit.</p>\n<p>The company’s oil-trading profit in 2020 beat the highest ever net income achieved by Vitol Group, the world’s largest independent trading house, which made a record $2.3 billion in 2019. Vitol has yet to disclose 2020 earnings.</p>\n<p>Shell only disclosed earnings from oil trading in its annual report, and leaving power, natural gas and LNG trading out. Analysts suspect the company was able to make similar profits from those businesses.</p>\n<p>The revelation in its annual report comes as the firm is embarking on an energy transition in which Shell has said it will lean on its trading prowess to push through less-profitable renewables.</p>\n<p>Rival BP Plc made a similar&nbsp;disclosure&nbsp;last year when its Chief Executive Officer Bernard Looney revealed trading typically boosted returns by 2 percentage points a year, suggesting it makes annual profit of as much as much as $2.5 billion.</p>","source":"lsy1584095487587","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Shell Reveals Oil-Trading Profit Doubled to $2.6 Billion in 2020</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nShell Reveals Oil-Trading Profit Doubled to $2.6 Billion in 2020\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-03-12 17:45 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=http://bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-03-12/shell-reveals-oil-trading-profit-doubled-to-2-6-billion-in-2020?srnd=markets-vp><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Royal Dutch Shell Plcdis closed the profitability of its sprawling and secretive oil trading unit for the first time, saying it almost doubled to $2.6 billion.\nThe scale of the earnings show the ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"http://bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-03-12/shell-reveals-oil-trading-profit-doubled-to-2-6-billion-in-2020?srnd=markets-vp\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"RDS.A":"荷兰皇家壳牌石油A类股","RDS.B":"荷兰皇家壳牌石油B类股"},"source_url":"http://bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-03-12/shell-reveals-oil-trading-profit-doubled-to-2-6-billion-in-2020?srnd=markets-vp","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1158535571","content_text":"Royal Dutch Shell Plcdis closed the profitability of its sprawling and secretive oil trading unit for the first time, saying it almost doubled to $2.6 billion.\nThe scale of the earnings show the importance of the business to the company in a year that weak demand and prices hit other parts of the business. Shell took advantage of wild price swings and a market situation that allowed it to make money by storing oil to sell it later for a profit.\nThe company’s oil-trading profit in 2020 beat the highest ever net income achieved by Vitol Group, the world’s largest independent trading house, which made a record $2.3 billion in 2019. Vitol has yet to disclose 2020 earnings.\nShell only disclosed earnings from oil trading in its annual report, and leaving power, natural gas and LNG trading out. Analysts suspect the company was able to make similar profits from those businesses.\nThe revelation in its annual report comes as the firm is embarking on an energy transition in which Shell has said it will lean on its trading prowess to push through less-profitable renewables.\nRival BP Plc made a similar disclosure last year when its Chief Executive Officer Bernard Looney revealed trading typically boosted returns by 2 percentage points a year, suggesting it makes annual profit of as much as much as $2.5 billion.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":367,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":328544981,"gmtCreate":1615544185443,"gmtModify":1704784353078,"author":{"id":"3577498455923590","authorId":"3577498455923590","name":"n57tpt9U2","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0796a20219fda5104c45929cfeb79aa8","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577498455923590","authorIdStr":"3577498455923590"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/328544981","repostId":"1155506399","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1155506399","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1615543208,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1155506399?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-03-12 18:00","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Don’t be fooled by the ‘value’ tag on these tech stocks. Many can provide plenty of growth too","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1155506399","media":"MarketWatch","summary":"Facebook, Oracle and Micron Technology are reasonably valued when considering the outlook for their ","content":"<p>Facebook, Oracle and Micron Technology are reasonably valued when considering the outlook for their sales growth.</p>\n<p>With another round of federal stimulus on the way and expectations for solid growth for the U.S. economy this year, value stocks have been rallying. Stocks with low valuations tend to do well during economic growth phases.</p>\n<p>Mark DeCambre&nbsp;underlined the value rallyby pointing out that the Dow Jones Industrial Average&nbsp;ended at a record high Dec. 10, while the Nasdaq Composite Index&nbsp;was still in a correction.</p>\n<p>But what about tech stocks? There’s plenty of value there too, as you can see in the screen below.</p>\n<p>Economists&nbsp;polled by MarketWatch expect the U.S. economy to expand by 6% in 2021. Yes, that’s coming off a 3.5% contraction in 2020, according to the&nbsp;latest estimate&nbsp;from the Bureau of Economic Analysis. But the 2021 growth rate would be the fastest since 1984, according to&nbsp;World Bank&nbsp;data.</p>\n<p><b>Tech value stock screen</b></p>\n<p>There are several definitions of value stocks, but generally they are those that trade at lower valuations to earnings and typically grow their sales at a slower pace. That said, an individual value stock might also be considered a growth stock. This is illustrated by the Russell indexes.</p>\n<p>The Russell 1000 Index&nbsp;is made up of the 1,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies by market capitalization and is reconstituted each year in June. Selected from the Russell 1000 are the Russell 1000 Value Index,which has 849 stocks, and the Russell 1000 Growth Index,which has 453 stocks. The groups overlap, with 291 stocks in both. You can read how FTSE Russell describes the makeup of its indexeshere.</p>\n<p>So an easy way to play value at this time is to buy shares of an exchange traded fund that tracks the Russell 1000 Value Index,such as the iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF&nbsp;or the Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF.As always, do your own research on any investment you consider to make an informed decisions.</p>\n<p>For a large-cap technology value screen, we started with the information technology sector of the S&amp;P 500 Index.Here’s how this sector’s weighted aggregate forward price-to-earnings ratio has increased over the past five years:</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/448e8db17465fbd7031f10b78f718961\" tg-width=\"1259\" tg-height=\"988\"><span>(FACTSET)</span></p>\n<p>The sector’s forward P/E his risen to 25.4.</p>\n<p>This doesn’t mean “expensive” tech stocks can’t be excellent investments. Salesforce.com&nbsp;was trading at a forward P/E of 68.7 five years ago, and the stock has nearly tripled since then.</p>\n<p>Getting back to the S&amp;P 500 tech value screen, we then added tech-oriented stocks in the communications services sector, including videogame developers and Facebook Inc.,Alphabet Inc.,Netflix Inc.&nbsp;and Twitter Inc..That brought the list up to 82 stocks. Two of the videogame developers made the cut, but among the four companies named above, only Facebook had a low enough P/E to pass the screen.</p>\n<p>Here are the 43 S&amp;P 500 tech companies that trade below the tech sector’s forward P/E of 25.4:</p>\n<table>\n <thead>\n  <tr>\n   <th>COMPANY</th>\n   <th>TICKER</th>\n   <th>INDUSTRY</th>\n   <th>FORWARD P/E</th>\n   <th>FORWARD PRICE/SALES</th>\n   <th>ESTIMATED OPERATING MARGIN - 2020</th>\n   <th>EXPECTED SALES GROWTH - 2021</th>\n   <th>ESTIMATED SALES GROWTH - 2020</th>\n   <th>DIVIDEND YIELD</th>\n  </tr>\n </thead>\n <tbody>\n  <tr>\n   <td>HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE CO.</td>\n   <td>HPE</td>\n   <td>COMPUTER PROCESSING HARDWARE</td>\n   <td>8.5</td>\n   <td>0.7</td>\n   <td>15.93%</td>\n   <td>2%</td>\n   <td>-6%</td>\n   <td>3.17%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>DXC Technology Co.</td>\n   <td>DXC</td>\n   <td>Data Processing Services</td>\n   <td>9.1</td>\n   <td>0.4</td>\n   <td>11.83%</td>\n   <td>-6%</td>\n   <td>-8%</td>\n   <td>0.00%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>HP Inc.</td>\n   <td>HPQ</td>\n   <td>Computer Processing Hardware</td>\n   <td>9.6</td>\n   <td>0.6</td>\n   <td>8.58%</td>\n   <td>5%</td>\n   <td>-2%</td>\n   <td>2.56%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>International Business Machines Corp.</td>\n   <td>IBM</td>\n   <td>Information Technology Services</td>\n   <td>11.5</td>\n   <td>1.5</td>\n   <td>22.24%</td>\n   <td>1%</td>\n   <td>-5%</td>\n   <td>5.10%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Western Union Company</td>\n   <td>WU</td>\n   <td>Finance/Rental/Leasing</td>\n   <td>12.0</td>\n   <td>2.0</td>\n   <td>25.48%</td>\n   <td>6%</td>\n   <td>-8%</td>\n   <td>3.82%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Vontier Corp</td>\n   <td>VNT</td>\n   <td>Other Transportation</td>\n   <td>12.7</td>\n   <td>1.9</td>\n   <td>23.54%</td>\n   <td>2%</td>\n   <td>N/A</td>\n   <td>0.00%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Seagate Technology PLC</td>\n   <td>STX</td>\n   <td>Computer Peripherals</td>\n   <td>12.9</td>\n   <td>1.6</td>\n   <td>16.69%</td>\n   <td>2%</td>\n   <td>1%</td>\n   <td>3.58%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Intel Corp.</td>\n   <td>INTC</td>\n   <td>Semiconductors</td>\n   <td>13.1</td>\n   <td>3.5</td>\n   <td>46.12%</td>\n   <td>-7%</td>\n   <td>8%</td>\n   <td>2.23%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Xerox Holdings Corp.</td>\n   <td>XRX</td>\n   <td>Computer Peripherals</td>\n   <td>13.2</td>\n   <td>0.7</td>\n   <td>9.57%</td>\n   <td>1%</td>\n   <td>-23%</td>\n   <td>3.77%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NortonLifeLock Inc.</td>\n   <td>NLOK</td>\n   <td>Packaged Software</td>\n   <td>13.3</td>\n   <td>4.6</td>\n   <td>45.97%</td>\n   <td>5%</td>\n   <td>-17%</td>\n   <td>2.38%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Western Digital Corp.</td>\n   <td>WDC</td>\n   <td>Computer Peripherals</td>\n   <td>13.6</td>\n   <td>1.2</td>\n   <td>13.77%</td>\n   <td>5%</td>\n   <td>-1%</td>\n   <td>0.00%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Micron Technology Inc.</td>\n   <td>MU</td>\n   <td>Semiconductors</td>\n   <td>14.0</td>\n   <td>3.4</td>\n   <td>42.02%</td>\n   <td>24%</td>\n   <td>1%</td>\n   <td>0.00%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Cisco Systems Inc.</td>\n   <td>CSCO</td>\n   <td>Information Technology Services</td>\n   <td>14.5</td>\n   <td>4.0</td>\n   <td>31.85%</td>\n   <td>1%</td>\n   <td>-3%</td>\n   <td>3.06%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Juniper Networks Inc.</td>\n   <td>JNPR</td>\n   <td>Information Technology Services</td>\n   <td>14.9</td>\n   <td>1.8</td>\n   <td>14.68%</td>\n   <td>4%</td>\n   <td>0%</td>\n   <td>3.24%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Oracle Corp.</td>\n   <td>ORCL</td>\n   <td>Packaged Software</td>\n   <td>15.4</td>\n   <td>5.2</td>\n   <td>45.99%</td>\n   <td>3%</td>\n   <td>2%</td>\n   <td>1.77%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NetApp Inc.</td>\n   <td>NTAP</td>\n   <td>Computer Peripherals</td>\n   <td>15.5</td>\n   <td>2.5</td>\n   <td>20.87%</td>\n   <td>5%</td>\n   <td>-1%</td>\n   <td>2.88%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Qorvo Inc.</td>\n   <td>QRVO</td>\n   <td>Semiconductors</td>\n   <td>16.0</td>\n   <td>4.3</td>\n   <td>33.32%</td>\n   <td>12%</td>\n   <td>19%</td>\n   <td>0.00%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Broadcom Inc.</td>\n   <td>AVGO</td>\n   <td>Semiconductors</td>\n   <td>16.0</td>\n   <td>6.6</td>\n   <td>48.55%</td>\n   <td>11%</td>\n   <td>7%</td>\n   <td>3.29%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Skyworks Solutions Inc.</td>\n   <td>SWKS</td>\n   <td>Semiconductors</td>\n   <td>17.1</td>\n   <td>5.8</td>\n   <td>39.24%</td>\n   <td>32%</td>\n   <td>11%</td>\n   <td>1.19%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Qualcomm Inc.</td>\n   <td>QCOM</td>\n   <td>Telecommunications Equipment</td>\n   <td>17.3</td>\n   <td>4.6</td>\n   <td>34.20%</td>\n   <td>32%</td>\n   <td>20%</td>\n   <td>2.03%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Akamai Technologies Inc.</td>\n   <td>AKAM</td>\n   <td>Internet Software/Services</td>\n   <td>17.8</td>\n   <td>4.6</td>\n   <td>36.90%</td>\n   <td>7%</td>\n   <td>11%</td>\n   <td>0.00%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Applied Materials Inc.</td>\n   <td>AMAT</td>\n   <td>Industrial Machinery</td>\n   <td>18.3</td>\n   <td>4.7</td>\n   <td>27.95%</td>\n   <td>22%</td>\n   <td>19%</td>\n   <td>0.78%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>F5 Networks Inc.</td>\n   <td>FFIV</td>\n   <td>Computer Communications</td>\n   <td>18.5</td>\n   <td>4.6</td>\n   <td>23.93%</td>\n   <td>8%</td>\n   <td>6%</td>\n   <td>0.00%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp. Class A</td>\n   <td>CTSH</td>\n   <td>Information Technology Services</td>\n   <td>19.2</td>\n   <td>2.3</td>\n   <td>17.33%</td>\n   <td>7%</td>\n   <td>-1%</td>\n   <td>1.26%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Microchip Technology Inc.</td>\n   <td>MCHP</td>\n   <td>Semiconductors</td>\n   <td>19.3</td>\n   <td>6.3</td>\n   <td>38.76%</td>\n   <td>10%</td>\n   <td>2%</td>\n   <td>1.10%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Corning Inc.</td>\n   <td>GLW</td>\n   <td>Electronic Components</td>\n   <td>19.9</td>\n   <td>2.3</td>\n   <td>24.82%</td>\n   <td>14%</td>\n   <td>-2%</td>\n   <td>2.46%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>KLA Corp.</td>\n   <td>KLAC</td>\n   <td>Electronic Production Equipment</td>\n   <td>20.0</td>\n   <td>6.3</td>\n   <td>38.69%</td>\n   <td>10%</td>\n   <td>21%</td>\n   <td>1.27%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Lam Research Corp.</td>\n   <td>LRCX</td>\n   <td>Electronic Production Equipment</td>\n   <td>20.1</td>\n   <td>5.1</td>\n   <td>31.05%</td>\n   <td>19%</td>\n   <td>23%</td>\n   <td>1.00%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Motorola Solutions Inc.</td>\n   <td>MSI</td>\n   <td>Aerospace &amp; Defense</td>\n   <td>20.4</td>\n   <td>3.8</td>\n   <td>25.63%</td>\n   <td>8%</td>\n   <td>-6%</td>\n   <td>1.60%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Citrix Systems Inc.</td>\n   <td>CTXS</td>\n   <td>Packaged Software</td>\n   <td>20.7</td>\n   <td>4.8</td>\n   <td>25.60%</td>\n   <td>4%</td>\n   <td>8%</td>\n   <td>1.12%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>TE Connectivity Ltd.</td>\n   <td>TEL</td>\n   <td>Electronic Components</td>\n   <td>21.9</td>\n   <td>3.1</td>\n   <td>20.96%</td>\n   <td>12%</td>\n   <td>-4%</td>\n   <td>1.48%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>CDW Corp.</td>\n   <td>CDW</td>\n   <td>Information Technology Services</td>\n   <td>22.0</td>\n   <td>1.1</td>\n   <td>8.73%</td>\n   <td>6%</td>\n   <td>2%</td>\n   <td>1.02%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Electronic Arts Inc.</td>\n   <td>EA</td>\n   <td>Recreational Products</td>\n   <td>22.2</td>\n   <td>5.9</td>\n   <td>25.35%</td>\n   <td>7%</td>\n   <td>14%</td>\n   <td>0.52%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Teradyne Inc.</td>\n   <td>TER</td>\n   <td>Electronic Production Equipment</td>\n   <td>22.5</td>\n   <td>5.5</td>\n   <td>32.80%</td>\n   <td>6%</td>\n   <td>36%</td>\n   <td>0.37%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Fiserv Inc.</td>\n   <td>FISV</td>\n   <td>Data Processing Services</td>\n   <td>22.9</td>\n   <td>5.5</td>\n   <td>33.83%</td>\n   <td>9%</td>\n   <td>-4%</td>\n   <td>0.00%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Fidelity National Information Services Inc.</td>\n   <td>FIS</td>\n   <td>Data Processing Services</td>\n   <td>22.9</td>\n   <td>6.6</td>\n   <td>41.91%</td>\n   <td>9%</td>\n   <td>21%</td>\n   <td>1.07%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Fleetcor Technologies Inc.</td>\n   <td>FLT</td>\n   <td>Miscellaneous Commercial Services</td>\n   <td>22.9</td>\n   <td>9.0</td>\n   <td>55.51%</td>\n   <td>11%</td>\n   <td>-10%</td>\n   <td>0.00%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Flir Systems Inc.</td>\n   <td>FLIR</td>\n   <td>Aerospace &amp; Defense</td>\n   <td>23.1</td>\n   <td>3.7</td>\n   <td>23.00%</td>\n   <td>0%</td>\n   <td>2%</td>\n   <td>1.25%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Facebook Inc. Class A</td>\n   <td>FB</td>\n   <td>Internet Software/Services</td>\n   <td>23.2</td>\n   <td>7.0</td>\n   <td>45.99%</td>\n   <td>25%</td>\n   <td>22%</td>\n   <td>0.00%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Keysight Technologies Inc.</td>\n   <td>KEYS</td>\n   <td>Electronic Equipment/Instruments</td>\n   <td>23.4</td>\n   <td>5.1</td>\n   <td>25.57%</td>\n   <td>13%</td>\n   <td>1%</td>\n   <td>0.00%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Analog Devices Inc.</td>\n   <td>ADI</td>\n   <td>Semiconductors</td>\n   <td>23.9</td>\n   <td>8.2</td>\n   <td>43.13%</td>\n   <td>14%</td>\n   <td>-3%</td>\n   <td>1.88%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Activision Blizzard Inc.</td>\n   <td>ATVI</td>\n   <td>Recreational Products</td>\n   <td>25.0</td>\n   <td>8.3</td>\n   <td>41.32%</td>\n   <td>1%</td>\n   <td>32%</td>\n   <td>0.51%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Texas Instruments Inc.</td>\n   <td>TXN</td>\n   <td>Semiconductors</td>\n   <td>25.2</td>\n   <td>9.4</td>\n   <td>47.78%</td>\n   <td>15%</td>\n   <td>1%</td>\n   <td>2.41%</td>\n  </tr>\n </tbody>\n</table>\n<p>FactSet</p>\n<p>Scroll the table to see all the data, including sales growth estimates and dividend yields.</p>\n<p>A note about the data: The operating margin and sales growth figures for 2020 are marked “estimated” because many companies have fiscal years that don’t match the calendar. So the figures are based on consensus estimates for&nbsp;<i>calendar</i>&nbsp;2020 among analyst polled by FactSet. For Micron Technology Inc.,the 2020 sales growth figure is for the past four reported fiscal quarters through Dec. 3.</p>\n<p><b>The curious case of Facebook</b></p>\n<p>You might wonder about Facebook, which lives in both the value and growth worlds. Its forward P/E valuation of 23.2 is relatively low. But Facebook is very much a growth stock — sales increased 22% last year, and analysts expect even better revenue growth of 25% in 2021.</p>\n<p>Facebook trades for seven times the consensus forward sales estimate, compared to a forward price-to-sales estimate of 5.9 for the entire S&amp;P 500 tech sector. But that “high” price-to-sales ratio may not be so important because it is such a profitable company. Its 2020 operating margin of 50% is among the highest on the list.</p>\n<p>Cody Willard called Facebook a bargain, not only because of its low P/E valuation but because of&nbsp;the long-term growth path&nbsp;for its Oculus virtual-reality hardware and software.</p>\n<p>There are 16 companies on the list that are expected to produce double-digit increases in sales in 2021, including Skyworks Solutions Inc.&nbsp;and Qualcomm Inc..Both are expected to grow their revenues by 21% this year.</p>\n<p><b>‘Old tech’</b></p>\n<p>Oracle Corp.&nbsp;is an “old tech” company that can be considered a value stock, as it trades for only 15.4 times the consensus earnings estimate for the next 12 months among analysts polled by FactSet. The company reported better-than-expected results for its fiscal third quarter after the close March 10 and&nbsp;increased its quarterly dividend by a third. Then on March 11, the stock fell as much as 9%. That “sell the good news” reaction may not be much of a surprise, as the stock had risen 48% over the previous year through March 10.</p>\n<p>International Business Machines Corp.&nbsp;is one of the cheapest stocks on the list, based on its forward P/E ratio of 11.5. The stock was up 2% from a year earlier through the close March 10. It has an attractive dividend yield of 5.10% that is supported by strong free cash flow.</p>\n<p>Victoria Greene, a portfolio manager at G Squared Private Wealth in College Station, Texas,may have been a bit early&nbsp;when naming IBM as an excellent long-term play in June. But in a recent interview, she said she was still confident that there was a lot of upside for IBM “as a turnaround story and reinventing themselves,” in light of its July 2019 acquisition of Red Hat and the strength of its Watson artificial-intelligence software platform.</p>\n<p><b>Wall Street’s price targets</b></p>\n<p>Leaving the list of 43 tech value stocks in the same order, here’s a summary of opinion among analysts polled by FactSet:</p>\n<table>\n <thead>\n  <tr>\n   <th>COMPANY</th>\n   <th>TICKER</th>\n   <th>SHARE \"BUY\" RATINGS</th>\n   <th>SHARE NEUTRAL RATINGS</th>\n   <th>SHARE \"SELL\" RATINGS</th>\n   <th>CLOSING PRICE - MARCH 10</th>\n   <th>CONSENSUS PRICE TARGET</th>\n   <th>IMPLIED 12-MONTH UPSIDE POTENTIAL</th>\n  </tr>\n </thead>\n <tbody>\n  <tr>\n   <td>HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE CO.</td>\n   <td>HPE</td>\n   <td>33%</td>\n   <td>57%</td>\n   <td>10%</td>\n   <td>$15.15</td>\n   <td>$15.46</td>\n   <td>2%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>DXC Technology Co.</td>\n   <td>DXC</td>\n   <td>29%</td>\n   <td>71%</td>\n   <td>0%</td>\n   <td>$29.00</td>\n   <td>$30.43</td>\n   <td>5%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>HP Inc.</td>\n   <td>HPQ</td>\n   <td>39%</td>\n   <td>39%</td>\n   <td>22%</td>\n   <td>$30.26</td>\n   <td>$30.63</td>\n   <td>1%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>International Business Machines Corp.</td>\n   <td>IBM</td>\n   <td>31%</td>\n   <td>56%</td>\n   <td>13%</td>\n   <td>$127.87</td>\n   <td>$136.93</td>\n   <td>7%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Western Union Company</td>\n   <td>WU</td>\n   <td>18%</td>\n   <td>59%</td>\n   <td>23%</td>\n   <td>$24.60</td>\n   <td>$25.14</td>\n   <td>2%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Vontier Corp</td>\n   <td>VNT</td>\n   <td>73%</td>\n   <td>27%</td>\n   <td>0%</td>\n   <td>$30.94</td>\n   <td>$39.56</td>\n   <td>28%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Seagate Technology PLC</td>\n   <td>STX</td>\n   <td>38%</td>\n   <td>48%</td>\n   <td>14%</td>\n   <td>$74.93</td>\n   <td>$74.83</td>\n   <td>0%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Intel Corp.</td>\n   <td>INTC</td>\n   <td>37%</td>\n   <td>39%</td>\n   <td>24%</td>\n   <td>$62.25</td>\n   <td>$63.93</td>\n   <td>3%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Xerox Holdings Corp.</td>\n   <td>XRX</td>\n   <td>0%</td>\n   <td>38%</td>\n   <td>62%</td>\n   <td>$26.53</td>\n   <td>$18.00</td>\n   <td>-32%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NortonLifeLock Inc.</td>\n   <td>NLOK</td>\n   <td>50%</td>\n   <td>50%</td>\n   <td>0%</td>\n   <td>$21.01</td>\n   <td>$25.88</td>\n   <td>23%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Western Digital Corp.</td>\n   <td>WDC</td>\n   <td>66%</td>\n   <td>31%</td>\n   <td>3%</td>\n   <td>$66.58</td>\n   <td>$71.35</td>\n   <td>7%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Micron Technology Inc.</td>\n   <td>MU</td>\n   <td>82%</td>\n   <td>18%</td>\n   <td>0%</td>\n   <td>$85.41</td>\n   <td>$112.26</td>\n   <td>31%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Cisco Systems Inc.</td>\n   <td>CSCO</td>\n   <td>46%</td>\n   <td>54%</td>\n   <td>0%</td>\n   <td>$48.29</td>\n   <td>$51.90</td>\n   <td>7%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Juniper Networks Inc.</td>\n   <td>JNPR</td>\n   <td>24%</td>\n   <td>57%</td>\n   <td>19%</td>\n   <td>$24.69</td>\n   <td>$25.05</td>\n   <td>1%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Oracle Corp.</td>\n   <td>ORCL</td>\n   <td>37%</td>\n   <td>56%</td>\n   <td>7%</td>\n   <td>$72.12</td>\n   <td>$72.35</td>\n   <td>0%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NetApp Inc.</td>\n   <td>NTAP</td>\n   <td>46%</td>\n   <td>46%</td>\n   <td>8%</td>\n   <td>$66.66</td>\n   <td>$74.77</td>\n   <td>12%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Qorvo Inc.</td>\n   <td>QRVO</td>\n   <td>65%</td>\n   <td>35%</td>\n   <td>0%</td>\n   <td>$165.37</td>\n   <td>$196.52</td>\n   <td>19%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Broadcom Inc.</td>\n   <td>AVGO</td>\n   <td>81%</td>\n   <td>16%</td>\n   <td>3%</td>\n   <td>$437.59</td>\n   <td>$512.83</td>\n   <td>17%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Skyworks Solutions Inc.</td>\n   <td>SWKS</td>\n   <td>57%</td>\n   <td>43%</td>\n   <td>0%</td>\n   <td>$167.66</td>\n   <td>$202.44</td>\n   <td>21%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Qualcomm Inc.</td>\n   <td>QCOM</td>\n   <td>70%</td>\n   <td>27%</td>\n   <td>3%</td>\n   <td>$127.87</td>\n   <td>$171.90</td>\n   <td>34%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Akamai Technologies Inc.</td>\n   <td>AKAM</td>\n   <td>67%</td>\n   <td>28%</td>\n   <td>5%</td>\n   <td>$96.36</td>\n   <td>$123.69</td>\n   <td>28%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Applied Materials Inc.</td>\n   <td>AMAT</td>\n   <td>84%</td>\n   <td>16%</td>\n   <td>0%</td>\n   <td>$112.68</td>\n   <td>$136.83</td>\n   <td>21%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>F5 Networks Inc.</td>\n   <td>FFIV</td>\n   <td>50%</td>\n   <td>50%</td>\n   <td>0%</td>\n   <td>$191.70</td>\n   <td>$220.13</td>\n   <td>15%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp. Class A</td>\n   <td>CTSH</td>\n   <td>48%</td>\n   <td>42%</td>\n   <td>10%</td>\n   <td>$76.02</td>\n   <td>$85.19</td>\n   <td>12%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Microchip Technology Inc.</td>\n   <td>MCHP</td>\n   <td>79%</td>\n   <td>21%</td>\n   <td>0%</td>\n   <td>$141.32</td>\n   <td>$170.52</td>\n   <td>21%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Corning Inc.</td>\n   <td>GLW</td>\n   <td>57%</td>\n   <td>43%</td>\n   <td>0%</td>\n   <td>$38.97</td>\n   <td>$41.29</td>\n   <td>6%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>KLA Corp.</td>\n   <td>KLAC</td>\n   <td>45%</td>\n   <td>55%</td>\n   <td>0%</td>\n   <td>$283.45</td>\n   <td>$320.12</td>\n   <td>13%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Lam Research Corp.</td>\n   <td>LRCX</td>\n   <td>76%</td>\n   <td>20%</td>\n   <td>4%</td>\n   <td>$518.70</td>\n   <td>$593.68</td>\n   <td>14%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Motorola Solutions Inc.</td>\n   <td>MSI</td>\n   <td>75%</td>\n   <td>25%</td>\n   <td>0%</td>\n   <td>$177.76</td>\n   <td>$204.78</td>\n   <td>15%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Citrix Systems Inc.</td>\n   <td>CTXS</td>\n   <td>53%</td>\n   <td>47%</td>\n   <td>0%</td>\n   <td>$131.78</td>\n   <td>$159.23</td>\n   <td>21%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>TE Connectivity Ltd.</td>\n   <td>TEL</td>\n   <td>60%</td>\n   <td>35%</td>\n   <td>5%</td>\n   <td>$130.09</td>\n   <td>$136.50</td>\n   <td>5%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>CDW Corp.</td>\n   <td>CDW</td>\n   <td>73%</td>\n   <td>18%</td>\n   <td>9%</td>\n   <td>$156.44</td>\n   <td>$169.56</td>\n   <td>8%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Electronic Arts Inc.</td>\n   <td>EA</td>\n   <td>62%</td>\n   <td>38%</td>\n   <td>0%</td>\n   <td>$130.12</td>\n   <td>$158.83</td>\n   <td>22%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Teradyne Inc.</td>\n   <td>TER</td>\n   <td>61%</td>\n   <td>33%</td>\n   <td>6%</td>\n   <td>$108.91</td>\n   <td>$136.89</td>\n   <td>26%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Fiserv Inc.</td>\n   <td>FISV</td>\n   <td>86%</td>\n   <td>11%</td>\n   <td>3%</td>\n   <td>$123.86</td>\n   <td>$136.55</td>\n   <td>10%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Fidelity National Information Services Inc.</td>\n   <td>FIS</td>\n   <td>74%</td>\n   <td>26%</td>\n   <td>0%</td>\n   <td>$145.52</td>\n   <td>$160.44</td>\n   <td>10%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Fleetcor Technologies Inc.</td>\n   <td>FLT</td>\n   <td>62%</td>\n   <td>38%</td>\n   <td>0%</td>\n   <td>$285.37</td>\n   <td>$299.16</td>\n   <td>5%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Flir Systems Inc.</td>\n   <td>FLIR</td>\n   <td>0%</td>\n   <td>100%</td>\n   <td>0%</td>\n   <td>$54.59</td>\n   <td>$55.17</td>\n   <td>1%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Facebook Inc. Class A</td>\n   <td>FB</td>\n   <td>86%</td>\n   <td>10%</td>\n   <td>4%</td>\n   <td>$264.90</td>\n   <td>$340.40</td>\n   <td>29%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Keysight Technologies Inc.</td>\n   <td>KEYS</td>\n   <td>85%</td>\n   <td>15%</td>\n   <td>0%</td>\n   <td>$135.28</td>\n   <td>$164.77</td>\n   <td>22%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Analog Devices Inc.</td>\n   <td>ADI</td>\n   <td>83%</td>\n   <td>17%</td>\n   <td>0%</td>\n   <td>$147.11</td>\n   <td>$181.55</td>\n   <td>23%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Activision Blizzard Inc.</td>\n   <td>ATVI</td>\n   <td>82%</td>\n   <td>15%</td>\n   <td>3%</td>\n   <td>$91.31</td>\n   <td>$113.32</td>\n   <td>24%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Texas Instruments Inc.</td>\n   <td>TXN</td>\n   <td>43%</td>\n   <td>40%</td>\n   <td>17%</td>\n   <td>$169.42</td>\n   <td>$184.80</td>\n   <td>9%</td>\n  </tr>\n </tbody>\n</table>\n<p>FactSet</p>\n<p>Scroll the table to the right to see the price targets.</p>\n<p>The analysts see double-digit upside potential for 25 of the 43 stocks over the next 12 months, with Qualcomm in the lead. Among the analysts polled by FactSet, 70% rate Qualcomm a “buy” or the equivalent. And the consensus price target implies 34% upside for the stock.</p>\n<p>The listed stock with the highest percentage of “buy” or equivalent ratings is Facebook, at 86%. The analysts expect the stock to rise 29% over the next year.</p>","source":"market_watch","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Don’t be fooled by the ‘value’ tag on these tech stocks. Many can provide plenty of growth too</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nDon’t be fooled by the ‘value’ tag on these tech stocks. Many can provide plenty of growth too\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-03-12 18:00 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.marketwatch.com/story/dont-be-fooled-by-the-value-tag-on-these-tech-stocks-many-can-provide-plenty-of-growth-too-11615484802?mod=home-page><strong>MarketWatch</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Facebook, Oracle and Micron Technology are reasonably valued when considering the outlook for their sales growth.\nWith another round of federal stimulus on the way and expectations for solid growth ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/dont-be-fooled-by-the-value-tag-on-these-tech-stocks-many-can-provide-plenty-of-growth-too-11615484802?mod=home-page\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","TWTR":"Twitter","ORCL":"甲骨文",".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite","INTC":"英特尔"},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/dont-be-fooled-by-the-value-tag-on-these-tech-stocks-many-can-provide-plenty-of-growth-too-11615484802?mod=home-page","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/599a65733b8245fcf7868668ef9ad712","article_id":"1155506399","content_text":"Facebook, Oracle and Micron Technology are reasonably valued when considering the outlook for their sales growth.\nWith another round of federal stimulus on the way and expectations for solid growth for the U.S. economy this year, value stocks have been rallying. Stocks with low valuations tend to do well during economic growth phases.\nMark DeCambre underlined the value rallyby pointing out that the Dow Jones Industrial Average ended at a record high Dec. 10, while the Nasdaq Composite Index was still in a correction.\nBut what about tech stocks? There’s plenty of value there too, as you can see in the screen below.\nEconomists polled by MarketWatch expect the U.S. economy to expand by 6% in 2021. Yes, that’s coming off a 3.5% contraction in 2020, according to the latest estimate from the Bureau of Economic Analysis. But the 2021 growth rate would be the fastest since 1984, according to World Bank data.\nTech value stock screen\nThere are several definitions of value stocks, but generally they are those that trade at lower valuations to earnings and typically grow their sales at a slower pace. That said, an individual value stock might also be considered a growth stock. This is illustrated by the Russell indexes.\nThe Russell 1000 Index is made up of the 1,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies by market capitalization and is reconstituted each year in June. Selected from the Russell 1000 are the Russell 1000 Value Index,which has 849 stocks, and the Russell 1000 Growth Index,which has 453 stocks. The groups overlap, with 291 stocks in both. You can read how FTSE Russell describes the makeup of its indexeshere.\nSo an easy way to play value at this time is to buy shares of an exchange traded fund that tracks the Russell 1000 Value Index,such as the iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF or the Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF.As always, do your own research on any investment you consider to make an informed decisions.\nFor a large-cap technology value screen, we started with the information technology sector of the S&P 500 Index.Here’s how this sector’s weighted aggregate forward price-to-earnings ratio has increased over the past five years:\n(FACTSET)\nThe sector’s forward P/E his risen to 25.4.\nThis doesn’t mean “expensive” tech stocks can’t be excellent investments. Salesforce.com was trading at a forward P/E of 68.7 five years ago, and the stock has nearly tripled since then.\nGetting back to the S&P 500 tech value screen, we then added tech-oriented stocks in the communications services sector, including videogame developers and Facebook Inc.,Alphabet Inc.,Netflix Inc. and Twitter Inc..That brought the list up to 82 stocks. Two of the videogame developers made the cut, but among the four companies named above, only Facebook had a low enough P/E to pass the screen.\nHere are the 43 S&P 500 tech companies that trade below the tech sector’s forward P/E of 25.4:\n\n\n\nCOMPANY\nTICKER\nINDUSTRY\nFORWARD P/E\nFORWARD PRICE/SALES\nESTIMATED OPERATING MARGIN - 2020\nEXPECTED SALES GROWTH - 2021\nESTIMATED SALES GROWTH - 2020\nDIVIDEND YIELD\n\n\n\n\nHEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE CO.\nHPE\nCOMPUTER PROCESSING HARDWARE\n8.5\n0.7\n15.93%\n2%\n-6%\n3.17%\n\n\nDXC Technology Co.\nDXC\nData Processing Services\n9.1\n0.4\n11.83%\n-6%\n-8%\n0.00%\n\n\nHP Inc.\nHPQ\nComputer Processing Hardware\n9.6\n0.6\n8.58%\n5%\n-2%\n2.56%\n\n\nInternational Business Machines Corp.\nIBM\nInformation Technology Services\n11.5\n1.5\n22.24%\n1%\n-5%\n5.10%\n\n\nWestern Union Company\nWU\nFinance/Rental/Leasing\n12.0\n2.0\n25.48%\n6%\n-8%\n3.82%\n\n\nVontier Corp\nVNT\nOther Transportation\n12.7\n1.9\n23.54%\n2%\nN/A\n0.00%\n\n\nSeagate Technology PLC\nSTX\nComputer Peripherals\n12.9\n1.6\n16.69%\n2%\n1%\n3.58%\n\n\nIntel Corp.\nINTC\nSemiconductors\n13.1\n3.5\n46.12%\n-7%\n8%\n2.23%\n\n\nXerox Holdings Corp.\nXRX\nComputer Peripherals\n13.2\n0.7\n9.57%\n1%\n-23%\n3.77%\n\n\nNortonLifeLock Inc.\nNLOK\nPackaged Software\n13.3\n4.6\n45.97%\n5%\n-17%\n2.38%\n\n\nWestern Digital Corp.\nWDC\nComputer Peripherals\n13.6\n1.2\n13.77%\n5%\n-1%\n0.00%\n\n\nMicron Technology Inc.\nMU\nSemiconductors\n14.0\n3.4\n42.02%\n24%\n1%\n0.00%\n\n\nCisco Systems Inc.\nCSCO\nInformation Technology Services\n14.5\n4.0\n31.85%\n1%\n-3%\n3.06%\n\n\nJuniper Networks Inc.\nJNPR\nInformation Technology Services\n14.9\n1.8\n14.68%\n4%\n0%\n3.24%\n\n\nOracle Corp.\nORCL\nPackaged Software\n15.4\n5.2\n45.99%\n3%\n2%\n1.77%\n\n\nNetApp Inc.\nNTAP\nComputer Peripherals\n15.5\n2.5\n20.87%\n5%\n-1%\n2.88%\n\n\nQorvo Inc.\nQRVO\nSemiconductors\n16.0\n4.3\n33.32%\n12%\n19%\n0.00%\n\n\nBroadcom Inc.\nAVGO\nSemiconductors\n16.0\n6.6\n48.55%\n11%\n7%\n3.29%\n\n\nSkyworks Solutions Inc.\nSWKS\nSemiconductors\n17.1\n5.8\n39.24%\n32%\n11%\n1.19%\n\n\nQualcomm Inc.\nQCOM\nTelecommunications Equipment\n17.3\n4.6\n34.20%\n32%\n20%\n2.03%\n\n\nAkamai Technologies Inc.\nAKAM\nInternet Software/Services\n17.8\n4.6\n36.90%\n7%\n11%\n0.00%\n\n\nApplied Materials Inc.\nAMAT\nIndustrial Machinery\n18.3\n4.7\n27.95%\n22%\n19%\n0.78%\n\n\nF5 Networks Inc.\nFFIV\nComputer Communications\n18.5\n4.6\n23.93%\n8%\n6%\n0.00%\n\n\nCognizant Technology Solutions Corp. Class A\nCTSH\nInformation Technology Services\n19.2\n2.3\n17.33%\n7%\n-1%\n1.26%\n\n\nMicrochip Technology Inc.\nMCHP\nSemiconductors\n19.3\n6.3\n38.76%\n10%\n2%\n1.10%\n\n\nCorning Inc.\nGLW\nElectronic Components\n19.9\n2.3\n24.82%\n14%\n-2%\n2.46%\n\n\nKLA Corp.\nKLAC\nElectronic Production Equipment\n20.0\n6.3\n38.69%\n10%\n21%\n1.27%\n\n\nLam Research Corp.\nLRCX\nElectronic Production Equipment\n20.1\n5.1\n31.05%\n19%\n23%\n1.00%\n\n\nMotorola Solutions Inc.\nMSI\nAerospace & Defense\n20.4\n3.8\n25.63%\n8%\n-6%\n1.60%\n\n\nCitrix Systems Inc.\nCTXS\nPackaged Software\n20.7\n4.8\n25.60%\n4%\n8%\n1.12%\n\n\nTE Connectivity Ltd.\nTEL\nElectronic Components\n21.9\n3.1\n20.96%\n12%\n-4%\n1.48%\n\n\nCDW Corp.\nCDW\nInformation Technology Services\n22.0\n1.1\n8.73%\n6%\n2%\n1.02%\n\n\nElectronic Arts Inc.\nEA\nRecreational Products\n22.2\n5.9\n25.35%\n7%\n14%\n0.52%\n\n\nTeradyne Inc.\nTER\nElectronic Production Equipment\n22.5\n5.5\n32.80%\n6%\n36%\n0.37%\n\n\nFiserv Inc.\nFISV\nData Processing Services\n22.9\n5.5\n33.83%\n9%\n-4%\n0.00%\n\n\nFidelity National Information Services Inc.\nFIS\nData Processing Services\n22.9\n6.6\n41.91%\n9%\n21%\n1.07%\n\n\nFleetcor Technologies Inc.\nFLT\nMiscellaneous Commercial Services\n22.9\n9.0\n55.51%\n11%\n-10%\n0.00%\n\n\nFlir Systems Inc.\nFLIR\nAerospace & Defense\n23.1\n3.7\n23.00%\n0%\n2%\n1.25%\n\n\nFacebook Inc. Class A\nFB\nInternet Software/Services\n23.2\n7.0\n45.99%\n25%\n22%\n0.00%\n\n\nKeysight Technologies Inc.\nKEYS\nElectronic Equipment/Instruments\n23.4\n5.1\n25.57%\n13%\n1%\n0.00%\n\n\nAnalog Devices Inc.\nADI\nSemiconductors\n23.9\n8.2\n43.13%\n14%\n-3%\n1.88%\n\n\nActivision Blizzard Inc.\nATVI\nRecreational Products\n25.0\n8.3\n41.32%\n1%\n32%\n0.51%\n\n\nTexas Instruments Inc.\nTXN\nSemiconductors\n25.2\n9.4\n47.78%\n15%\n1%\n2.41%\n\n\n\nFactSet\nScroll the table to see all the data, including sales growth estimates and dividend yields.\nA note about the data: The operating margin and sales growth figures for 2020 are marked “estimated” because many companies have fiscal years that don’t match the calendar. So the figures are based on consensus estimates for calendar 2020 among analyst polled by FactSet. For Micron Technology Inc.,the 2020 sales growth figure is for the past four reported fiscal quarters through Dec. 3.\nThe curious case of Facebook\nYou might wonder about Facebook, which lives in both the value and growth worlds. Its forward P/E valuation of 23.2 is relatively low. But Facebook is very much a growth stock — sales increased 22% last year, and analysts expect even better revenue growth of 25% in 2021.\nFacebook trades for seven times the consensus forward sales estimate, compared to a forward price-to-sales estimate of 5.9 for the entire S&P 500 tech sector. But that “high” price-to-sales ratio may not be so important because it is such a profitable company. Its 2020 operating margin of 50% is among the highest on the list.\nCody Willard called Facebook a bargain, not only because of its low P/E valuation but because of the long-term growth path for its Oculus virtual-reality hardware and software.\nThere are 16 companies on the list that are expected to produce double-digit increases in sales in 2021, including Skyworks Solutions Inc. and Qualcomm Inc..Both are expected to grow their revenues by 21% this year.\n‘Old tech’\nOracle Corp. is an “old tech” company that can be considered a value stock, as it trades for only 15.4 times the consensus earnings estimate for the next 12 months among analysts polled by FactSet. The company reported better-than-expected results for its fiscal third quarter after the close March 10 and increased its quarterly dividend by a third. Then on March 11, the stock fell as much as 9%. That “sell the good news” reaction may not be much of a surprise, as the stock had risen 48% over the previous year through March 10.\nInternational Business Machines Corp. is one of the cheapest stocks on the list, based on its forward P/E ratio of 11.5. The stock was up 2% from a year earlier through the close March 10. It has an attractive dividend yield of 5.10% that is supported by strong free cash flow.\nVictoria Greene, a portfolio manager at G Squared Private Wealth in College Station, Texas,may have been a bit early when naming IBM as an excellent long-term play in June. But in a recent interview, she said she was still confident that there was a lot of upside for IBM “as a turnaround story and reinventing themselves,” in light of its July 2019 acquisition of Red Hat and the strength of its Watson artificial-intelligence software platform.\nWall Street’s price targets\nLeaving the list of 43 tech value stocks in the same order, here’s a summary of opinion among analysts polled by FactSet:\n\n\n\nCOMPANY\nTICKER\nSHARE \"BUY\" RATINGS\nSHARE NEUTRAL RATINGS\nSHARE \"SELL\" RATINGS\nCLOSING PRICE - MARCH 10\nCONSENSUS PRICE TARGET\nIMPLIED 12-MONTH UPSIDE POTENTIAL\n\n\n\n\nHEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE CO.\nHPE\n33%\n57%\n10%\n$15.15\n$15.46\n2%\n\n\nDXC Technology Co.\nDXC\n29%\n71%\n0%\n$29.00\n$30.43\n5%\n\n\nHP Inc.\nHPQ\n39%\n39%\n22%\n$30.26\n$30.63\n1%\n\n\nInternational Business Machines Corp.\nIBM\n31%\n56%\n13%\n$127.87\n$136.93\n7%\n\n\nWestern Union Company\nWU\n18%\n59%\n23%\n$24.60\n$25.14\n2%\n\n\nVontier Corp\nVNT\n73%\n27%\n0%\n$30.94\n$39.56\n28%\n\n\nSeagate Technology PLC\nSTX\n38%\n48%\n14%\n$74.93\n$74.83\n0%\n\n\nIntel Corp.\nINTC\n37%\n39%\n24%\n$62.25\n$63.93\n3%\n\n\nXerox Holdings Corp.\nXRX\n0%\n38%\n62%\n$26.53\n$18.00\n-32%\n\n\nNortonLifeLock Inc.\nNLOK\n50%\n50%\n0%\n$21.01\n$25.88\n23%\n\n\nWestern Digital Corp.\nWDC\n66%\n31%\n3%\n$66.58\n$71.35\n7%\n\n\nMicron Technology Inc.\nMU\n82%\n18%\n0%\n$85.41\n$112.26\n31%\n\n\nCisco Systems Inc.\nCSCO\n46%\n54%\n0%\n$48.29\n$51.90\n7%\n\n\nJuniper Networks Inc.\nJNPR\n24%\n57%\n19%\n$24.69\n$25.05\n1%\n\n\nOracle Corp.\nORCL\n37%\n56%\n7%\n$72.12\n$72.35\n0%\n\n\nNetApp Inc.\nNTAP\n46%\n46%\n8%\n$66.66\n$74.77\n12%\n\n\nQorvo Inc.\nQRVO\n65%\n35%\n0%\n$165.37\n$196.52\n19%\n\n\nBroadcom Inc.\nAVGO\n81%\n16%\n3%\n$437.59\n$512.83\n17%\n\n\nSkyworks Solutions Inc.\nSWKS\n57%\n43%\n0%\n$167.66\n$202.44\n21%\n\n\nQualcomm Inc.\nQCOM\n70%\n27%\n3%\n$127.87\n$171.90\n34%\n\n\nAkamai Technologies Inc.\nAKAM\n67%\n28%\n5%\n$96.36\n$123.69\n28%\n\n\nApplied Materials Inc.\nAMAT\n84%\n16%\n0%\n$112.68\n$136.83\n21%\n\n\nF5 Networks Inc.\nFFIV\n50%\n50%\n0%\n$191.70\n$220.13\n15%\n\n\nCognizant Technology Solutions Corp. Class A\nCTSH\n48%\n42%\n10%\n$76.02\n$85.19\n12%\n\n\nMicrochip Technology Inc.\nMCHP\n79%\n21%\n0%\n$141.32\n$170.52\n21%\n\n\nCorning Inc.\nGLW\n57%\n43%\n0%\n$38.97\n$41.29\n6%\n\n\nKLA Corp.\nKLAC\n45%\n55%\n0%\n$283.45\n$320.12\n13%\n\n\nLam Research Corp.\nLRCX\n76%\n20%\n4%\n$518.70\n$593.68\n14%\n\n\nMotorola Solutions Inc.\nMSI\n75%\n25%\n0%\n$177.76\n$204.78\n15%\n\n\nCitrix Systems Inc.\nCTXS\n53%\n47%\n0%\n$131.78\n$159.23\n21%\n\n\nTE Connectivity Ltd.\nTEL\n60%\n35%\n5%\n$130.09\n$136.50\n5%\n\n\nCDW Corp.\nCDW\n73%\n18%\n9%\n$156.44\n$169.56\n8%\n\n\nElectronic Arts Inc.\nEA\n62%\n38%\n0%\n$130.12\n$158.83\n22%\n\n\nTeradyne Inc.\nTER\n61%\n33%\n6%\n$108.91\n$136.89\n26%\n\n\nFiserv Inc.\nFISV\n86%\n11%\n3%\n$123.86\n$136.55\n10%\n\n\nFidelity National Information Services Inc.\nFIS\n74%\n26%\n0%\n$145.52\n$160.44\n10%\n\n\nFleetcor Technologies Inc.\nFLT\n62%\n38%\n0%\n$285.37\n$299.16\n5%\n\n\nFlir Systems Inc.\nFLIR\n0%\n100%\n0%\n$54.59\n$55.17\n1%\n\n\nFacebook Inc. Class A\nFB\n86%\n10%\n4%\n$264.90\n$340.40\n29%\n\n\nKeysight Technologies Inc.\nKEYS\n85%\n15%\n0%\n$135.28\n$164.77\n22%\n\n\nAnalog Devices Inc.\nADI\n83%\n17%\n0%\n$147.11\n$181.55\n23%\n\n\nActivision Blizzard Inc.\nATVI\n82%\n15%\n3%\n$91.31\n$113.32\n24%\n\n\nTexas Instruments Inc.\nTXN\n43%\n40%\n17%\n$169.42\n$184.80\n9%\n\n\n\nFactSet\nScroll the table to the right to see the price targets.\nThe analysts see double-digit upside potential for 25 of the 43 stocks over the next 12 months, with Qualcomm in the lead. Among the analysts polled by FactSet, 70% rate Qualcomm a “buy” or the equivalent. And the consensus price target implies 34% upside for the stock.\nThe listed stock with the highest percentage of “buy” or equivalent ratings is Facebook, at 86%. The analysts expect the stock to rise 29% over the next year.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":449,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":328544981,"gmtCreate":1615544185443,"gmtModify":1704784353078,"author":{"id":"3577498455923590","authorId":"3577498455923590","name":"n57tpt9U2","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0796a20219fda5104c45929cfeb79aa8","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577498455923590","authorIdStr":"3577498455923590"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/328544981","repostId":"1155506399","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1155506399","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1615543208,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1155506399?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-03-12 18:00","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Don’t be fooled by the ‘value’ tag on these tech stocks. Many can provide plenty of growth too","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1155506399","media":"MarketWatch","summary":"Facebook, Oracle and Micron Technology are reasonably valued when considering the outlook for their ","content":"<p>Facebook, Oracle and Micron Technology are reasonably valued when considering the outlook for their sales growth.</p>\n<p>With another round of federal stimulus on the way and expectations for solid growth for the U.S. economy this year, value stocks have been rallying. Stocks with low valuations tend to do well during economic growth phases.</p>\n<p>Mark DeCambre&nbsp;underlined the value rallyby pointing out that the Dow Jones Industrial Average&nbsp;ended at a record high Dec. 10, while the Nasdaq Composite Index&nbsp;was still in a correction.</p>\n<p>But what about tech stocks? There’s plenty of value there too, as you can see in the screen below.</p>\n<p>Economists&nbsp;polled by MarketWatch expect the U.S. economy to expand by 6% in 2021. Yes, that’s coming off a 3.5% contraction in 2020, according to the&nbsp;latest estimate&nbsp;from the Bureau of Economic Analysis. But the 2021 growth rate would be the fastest since 1984, according to&nbsp;World Bank&nbsp;data.</p>\n<p><b>Tech value stock screen</b></p>\n<p>There are several definitions of value stocks, but generally they are those that trade at lower valuations to earnings and typically grow their sales at a slower pace. That said, an individual value stock might also be considered a growth stock. This is illustrated by the Russell indexes.</p>\n<p>The Russell 1000 Index&nbsp;is made up of the 1,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies by market capitalization and is reconstituted each year in June. Selected from the Russell 1000 are the Russell 1000 Value Index,which has 849 stocks, and the Russell 1000 Growth Index,which has 453 stocks. The groups overlap, with 291 stocks in both. You can read how FTSE Russell describes the makeup of its indexeshere.</p>\n<p>So an easy way to play value at this time is to buy shares of an exchange traded fund that tracks the Russell 1000 Value Index,such as the iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF&nbsp;or the Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF.As always, do your own research on any investment you consider to make an informed decisions.</p>\n<p>For a large-cap technology value screen, we started with the information technology sector of the S&amp;P 500 Index.Here’s how this sector’s weighted aggregate forward price-to-earnings ratio has increased over the past five years:</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/448e8db17465fbd7031f10b78f718961\" tg-width=\"1259\" tg-height=\"988\"><span>(FACTSET)</span></p>\n<p>The sector’s forward P/E his risen to 25.4.</p>\n<p>This doesn’t mean “expensive” tech stocks can’t be excellent investments. Salesforce.com&nbsp;was trading at a forward P/E of 68.7 five years ago, and the stock has nearly tripled since then.</p>\n<p>Getting back to the S&amp;P 500 tech value screen, we then added tech-oriented stocks in the communications services sector, including videogame developers and Facebook Inc.,Alphabet Inc.,Netflix Inc.&nbsp;and Twitter Inc..That brought the list up to 82 stocks. Two of the videogame developers made the cut, but among the four companies named above, only Facebook had a low enough P/E to pass the screen.</p>\n<p>Here are the 43 S&amp;P 500 tech companies that trade below the tech sector’s forward P/E of 25.4:</p>\n<table>\n <thead>\n  <tr>\n   <th>COMPANY</th>\n   <th>TICKER</th>\n   <th>INDUSTRY</th>\n   <th>FORWARD P/E</th>\n   <th>FORWARD PRICE/SALES</th>\n   <th>ESTIMATED OPERATING MARGIN - 2020</th>\n   <th>EXPECTED SALES GROWTH - 2021</th>\n   <th>ESTIMATED SALES GROWTH - 2020</th>\n   <th>DIVIDEND YIELD</th>\n  </tr>\n </thead>\n <tbody>\n  <tr>\n   <td>HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE CO.</td>\n   <td>HPE</td>\n   <td>COMPUTER PROCESSING HARDWARE</td>\n   <td>8.5</td>\n   <td>0.7</td>\n   <td>15.93%</td>\n   <td>2%</td>\n   <td>-6%</td>\n   <td>3.17%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>DXC Technology Co.</td>\n   <td>DXC</td>\n   <td>Data Processing Services</td>\n   <td>9.1</td>\n   <td>0.4</td>\n   <td>11.83%</td>\n   <td>-6%</td>\n   <td>-8%</td>\n   <td>0.00%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>HP Inc.</td>\n   <td>HPQ</td>\n   <td>Computer Processing Hardware</td>\n   <td>9.6</td>\n   <td>0.6</td>\n   <td>8.58%</td>\n   <td>5%</td>\n   <td>-2%</td>\n   <td>2.56%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>International Business Machines Corp.</td>\n   <td>IBM</td>\n   <td>Information Technology Services</td>\n   <td>11.5</td>\n   <td>1.5</td>\n   <td>22.24%</td>\n   <td>1%</td>\n   <td>-5%</td>\n   <td>5.10%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Western Union Company</td>\n   <td>WU</td>\n   <td>Finance/Rental/Leasing</td>\n   <td>12.0</td>\n   <td>2.0</td>\n   <td>25.48%</td>\n   <td>6%</td>\n   <td>-8%</td>\n   <td>3.82%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Vontier Corp</td>\n   <td>VNT</td>\n   <td>Other Transportation</td>\n   <td>12.7</td>\n   <td>1.9</td>\n   <td>23.54%</td>\n   <td>2%</td>\n   <td>N/A</td>\n   <td>0.00%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Seagate Technology PLC</td>\n   <td>STX</td>\n   <td>Computer Peripherals</td>\n   <td>12.9</td>\n   <td>1.6</td>\n   <td>16.69%</td>\n   <td>2%</td>\n   <td>1%</td>\n   <td>3.58%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Intel Corp.</td>\n   <td>INTC</td>\n   <td>Semiconductors</td>\n   <td>13.1</td>\n   <td>3.5</td>\n   <td>46.12%</td>\n   <td>-7%</td>\n   <td>8%</td>\n   <td>2.23%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Xerox Holdings Corp.</td>\n   <td>XRX</td>\n   <td>Computer Peripherals</td>\n   <td>13.2</td>\n   <td>0.7</td>\n   <td>9.57%</td>\n   <td>1%</td>\n   <td>-23%</td>\n   <td>3.77%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NortonLifeLock Inc.</td>\n   <td>NLOK</td>\n   <td>Packaged Software</td>\n   <td>13.3</td>\n   <td>4.6</td>\n   <td>45.97%</td>\n   <td>5%</td>\n   <td>-17%</td>\n   <td>2.38%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Western Digital Corp.</td>\n   <td>WDC</td>\n   <td>Computer Peripherals</td>\n   <td>13.6</td>\n   <td>1.2</td>\n   <td>13.77%</td>\n   <td>5%</td>\n   <td>-1%</td>\n   <td>0.00%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Micron Technology Inc.</td>\n   <td>MU</td>\n   <td>Semiconductors</td>\n   <td>14.0</td>\n   <td>3.4</td>\n   <td>42.02%</td>\n   <td>24%</td>\n   <td>1%</td>\n   <td>0.00%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Cisco Systems Inc.</td>\n   <td>CSCO</td>\n   <td>Information Technology Services</td>\n   <td>14.5</td>\n   <td>4.0</td>\n   <td>31.85%</td>\n   <td>1%</td>\n   <td>-3%</td>\n   <td>3.06%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Juniper Networks Inc.</td>\n   <td>JNPR</td>\n   <td>Information Technology Services</td>\n   <td>14.9</td>\n   <td>1.8</td>\n   <td>14.68%</td>\n   <td>4%</td>\n   <td>0%</td>\n   <td>3.24%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Oracle Corp.</td>\n   <td>ORCL</td>\n   <td>Packaged Software</td>\n   <td>15.4</td>\n   <td>5.2</td>\n   <td>45.99%</td>\n   <td>3%</td>\n   <td>2%</td>\n   <td>1.77%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NetApp Inc.</td>\n   <td>NTAP</td>\n   <td>Computer Peripherals</td>\n   <td>15.5</td>\n   <td>2.5</td>\n   <td>20.87%</td>\n   <td>5%</td>\n   <td>-1%</td>\n   <td>2.88%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Qorvo Inc.</td>\n   <td>QRVO</td>\n   <td>Semiconductors</td>\n   <td>16.0</td>\n   <td>4.3</td>\n   <td>33.32%</td>\n   <td>12%</td>\n   <td>19%</td>\n   <td>0.00%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Broadcom Inc.</td>\n   <td>AVGO</td>\n   <td>Semiconductors</td>\n   <td>16.0</td>\n   <td>6.6</td>\n   <td>48.55%</td>\n   <td>11%</td>\n   <td>7%</td>\n   <td>3.29%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Skyworks Solutions Inc.</td>\n   <td>SWKS</td>\n   <td>Semiconductors</td>\n   <td>17.1</td>\n   <td>5.8</td>\n   <td>39.24%</td>\n   <td>32%</td>\n   <td>11%</td>\n   <td>1.19%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Qualcomm Inc.</td>\n   <td>QCOM</td>\n   <td>Telecommunications Equipment</td>\n   <td>17.3</td>\n   <td>4.6</td>\n   <td>34.20%</td>\n   <td>32%</td>\n   <td>20%</td>\n   <td>2.03%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Akamai Technologies Inc.</td>\n   <td>AKAM</td>\n   <td>Internet Software/Services</td>\n   <td>17.8</td>\n   <td>4.6</td>\n   <td>36.90%</td>\n   <td>7%</td>\n   <td>11%</td>\n   <td>0.00%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Applied Materials Inc.</td>\n   <td>AMAT</td>\n   <td>Industrial Machinery</td>\n   <td>18.3</td>\n   <td>4.7</td>\n   <td>27.95%</td>\n   <td>22%</td>\n   <td>19%</td>\n   <td>0.78%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>F5 Networks Inc.</td>\n   <td>FFIV</td>\n   <td>Computer Communications</td>\n   <td>18.5</td>\n   <td>4.6</td>\n   <td>23.93%</td>\n   <td>8%</td>\n   <td>6%</td>\n   <td>0.00%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp. Class A</td>\n   <td>CTSH</td>\n   <td>Information Technology Services</td>\n   <td>19.2</td>\n   <td>2.3</td>\n   <td>17.33%</td>\n   <td>7%</td>\n   <td>-1%</td>\n   <td>1.26%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Microchip Technology Inc.</td>\n   <td>MCHP</td>\n   <td>Semiconductors</td>\n   <td>19.3</td>\n   <td>6.3</td>\n   <td>38.76%</td>\n   <td>10%</td>\n   <td>2%</td>\n   <td>1.10%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Corning Inc.</td>\n   <td>GLW</td>\n   <td>Electronic Components</td>\n   <td>19.9</td>\n   <td>2.3</td>\n   <td>24.82%</td>\n   <td>14%</td>\n   <td>-2%</td>\n   <td>2.46%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>KLA Corp.</td>\n   <td>KLAC</td>\n   <td>Electronic Production Equipment</td>\n   <td>20.0</td>\n   <td>6.3</td>\n   <td>38.69%</td>\n   <td>10%</td>\n   <td>21%</td>\n   <td>1.27%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Lam Research Corp.</td>\n   <td>LRCX</td>\n   <td>Electronic Production Equipment</td>\n   <td>20.1</td>\n   <td>5.1</td>\n   <td>31.05%</td>\n   <td>19%</td>\n   <td>23%</td>\n   <td>1.00%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Motorola Solutions Inc.</td>\n   <td>MSI</td>\n   <td>Aerospace &amp; Defense</td>\n   <td>20.4</td>\n   <td>3.8</td>\n   <td>25.63%</td>\n   <td>8%</td>\n   <td>-6%</td>\n   <td>1.60%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Citrix Systems Inc.</td>\n   <td>CTXS</td>\n   <td>Packaged Software</td>\n   <td>20.7</td>\n   <td>4.8</td>\n   <td>25.60%</td>\n   <td>4%</td>\n   <td>8%</td>\n   <td>1.12%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>TE Connectivity Ltd.</td>\n   <td>TEL</td>\n   <td>Electronic Components</td>\n   <td>21.9</td>\n   <td>3.1</td>\n   <td>20.96%</td>\n   <td>12%</td>\n   <td>-4%</td>\n   <td>1.48%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>CDW Corp.</td>\n   <td>CDW</td>\n   <td>Information Technology Services</td>\n   <td>22.0</td>\n   <td>1.1</td>\n   <td>8.73%</td>\n   <td>6%</td>\n   <td>2%</td>\n   <td>1.02%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Electronic Arts Inc.</td>\n   <td>EA</td>\n   <td>Recreational Products</td>\n   <td>22.2</td>\n   <td>5.9</td>\n   <td>25.35%</td>\n   <td>7%</td>\n   <td>14%</td>\n   <td>0.52%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Teradyne Inc.</td>\n   <td>TER</td>\n   <td>Electronic Production Equipment</td>\n   <td>22.5</td>\n   <td>5.5</td>\n   <td>32.80%</td>\n   <td>6%</td>\n   <td>36%</td>\n   <td>0.37%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Fiserv Inc.</td>\n   <td>FISV</td>\n   <td>Data Processing Services</td>\n   <td>22.9</td>\n   <td>5.5</td>\n   <td>33.83%</td>\n   <td>9%</td>\n   <td>-4%</td>\n   <td>0.00%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Fidelity National Information Services Inc.</td>\n   <td>FIS</td>\n   <td>Data Processing Services</td>\n   <td>22.9</td>\n   <td>6.6</td>\n   <td>41.91%</td>\n   <td>9%</td>\n   <td>21%</td>\n   <td>1.07%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Fleetcor Technologies Inc.</td>\n   <td>FLT</td>\n   <td>Miscellaneous Commercial Services</td>\n   <td>22.9</td>\n   <td>9.0</td>\n   <td>55.51%</td>\n   <td>11%</td>\n   <td>-10%</td>\n   <td>0.00%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Flir Systems Inc.</td>\n   <td>FLIR</td>\n   <td>Aerospace &amp; Defense</td>\n   <td>23.1</td>\n   <td>3.7</td>\n   <td>23.00%</td>\n   <td>0%</td>\n   <td>2%</td>\n   <td>1.25%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Facebook Inc. Class A</td>\n   <td>FB</td>\n   <td>Internet Software/Services</td>\n   <td>23.2</td>\n   <td>7.0</td>\n   <td>45.99%</td>\n   <td>25%</td>\n   <td>22%</td>\n   <td>0.00%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Keysight Technologies Inc.</td>\n   <td>KEYS</td>\n   <td>Electronic Equipment/Instruments</td>\n   <td>23.4</td>\n   <td>5.1</td>\n   <td>25.57%</td>\n   <td>13%</td>\n   <td>1%</td>\n   <td>0.00%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Analog Devices Inc.</td>\n   <td>ADI</td>\n   <td>Semiconductors</td>\n   <td>23.9</td>\n   <td>8.2</td>\n   <td>43.13%</td>\n   <td>14%</td>\n   <td>-3%</td>\n   <td>1.88%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Activision Blizzard Inc.</td>\n   <td>ATVI</td>\n   <td>Recreational Products</td>\n   <td>25.0</td>\n   <td>8.3</td>\n   <td>41.32%</td>\n   <td>1%</td>\n   <td>32%</td>\n   <td>0.51%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Texas Instruments Inc.</td>\n   <td>TXN</td>\n   <td>Semiconductors</td>\n   <td>25.2</td>\n   <td>9.4</td>\n   <td>47.78%</td>\n   <td>15%</td>\n   <td>1%</td>\n   <td>2.41%</td>\n  </tr>\n </tbody>\n</table>\n<p>FactSet</p>\n<p>Scroll the table to see all the data, including sales growth estimates and dividend yields.</p>\n<p>A note about the data: The operating margin and sales growth figures for 2020 are marked “estimated” because many companies have fiscal years that don’t match the calendar. So the figures are based on consensus estimates for&nbsp;<i>calendar</i>&nbsp;2020 among analyst polled by FactSet. For Micron Technology Inc.,the 2020 sales growth figure is for the past four reported fiscal quarters through Dec. 3.</p>\n<p><b>The curious case of Facebook</b></p>\n<p>You might wonder about Facebook, which lives in both the value and growth worlds. Its forward P/E valuation of 23.2 is relatively low. But Facebook is very much a growth stock — sales increased 22% last year, and analysts expect even better revenue growth of 25% in 2021.</p>\n<p>Facebook trades for seven times the consensus forward sales estimate, compared to a forward price-to-sales estimate of 5.9 for the entire S&amp;P 500 tech sector. But that “high” price-to-sales ratio may not be so important because it is such a profitable company. Its 2020 operating margin of 50% is among the highest on the list.</p>\n<p>Cody Willard called Facebook a bargain, not only because of its low P/E valuation but because of&nbsp;the long-term growth path&nbsp;for its Oculus virtual-reality hardware and software.</p>\n<p>There are 16 companies on the list that are expected to produce double-digit increases in sales in 2021, including Skyworks Solutions Inc.&nbsp;and Qualcomm Inc..Both are expected to grow their revenues by 21% this year.</p>\n<p><b>‘Old tech’</b></p>\n<p>Oracle Corp.&nbsp;is an “old tech” company that can be considered a value stock, as it trades for only 15.4 times the consensus earnings estimate for the next 12 months among analysts polled by FactSet. The company reported better-than-expected results for its fiscal third quarter after the close March 10 and&nbsp;increased its quarterly dividend by a third. Then on March 11, the stock fell as much as 9%. That “sell the good news” reaction may not be much of a surprise, as the stock had risen 48% over the previous year through March 10.</p>\n<p>International Business Machines Corp.&nbsp;is one of the cheapest stocks on the list, based on its forward P/E ratio of 11.5. The stock was up 2% from a year earlier through the close March 10. It has an attractive dividend yield of 5.10% that is supported by strong free cash flow.</p>\n<p>Victoria Greene, a portfolio manager at G Squared Private Wealth in College Station, Texas,may have been a bit early&nbsp;when naming IBM as an excellent long-term play in June. But in a recent interview, she said she was still confident that there was a lot of upside for IBM “as a turnaround story and reinventing themselves,” in light of its July 2019 acquisition of Red Hat and the strength of its Watson artificial-intelligence software platform.</p>\n<p><b>Wall Street’s price targets</b></p>\n<p>Leaving the list of 43 tech value stocks in the same order, here’s a summary of opinion among analysts polled by FactSet:</p>\n<table>\n <thead>\n  <tr>\n   <th>COMPANY</th>\n   <th>TICKER</th>\n   <th>SHARE \"BUY\" RATINGS</th>\n   <th>SHARE NEUTRAL RATINGS</th>\n   <th>SHARE \"SELL\" RATINGS</th>\n   <th>CLOSING PRICE - MARCH 10</th>\n   <th>CONSENSUS PRICE TARGET</th>\n   <th>IMPLIED 12-MONTH UPSIDE POTENTIAL</th>\n  </tr>\n </thead>\n <tbody>\n  <tr>\n   <td>HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE CO.</td>\n   <td>HPE</td>\n   <td>33%</td>\n   <td>57%</td>\n   <td>10%</td>\n   <td>$15.15</td>\n   <td>$15.46</td>\n   <td>2%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>DXC Technology Co.</td>\n   <td>DXC</td>\n   <td>29%</td>\n   <td>71%</td>\n   <td>0%</td>\n   <td>$29.00</td>\n   <td>$30.43</td>\n   <td>5%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>HP Inc.</td>\n   <td>HPQ</td>\n   <td>39%</td>\n   <td>39%</td>\n   <td>22%</td>\n   <td>$30.26</td>\n   <td>$30.63</td>\n   <td>1%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>International Business Machines Corp.</td>\n   <td>IBM</td>\n   <td>31%</td>\n   <td>56%</td>\n   <td>13%</td>\n   <td>$127.87</td>\n   <td>$136.93</td>\n   <td>7%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Western Union Company</td>\n   <td>WU</td>\n   <td>18%</td>\n   <td>59%</td>\n   <td>23%</td>\n   <td>$24.60</td>\n   <td>$25.14</td>\n   <td>2%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Vontier Corp</td>\n   <td>VNT</td>\n   <td>73%</td>\n   <td>27%</td>\n   <td>0%</td>\n   <td>$30.94</td>\n   <td>$39.56</td>\n   <td>28%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Seagate Technology PLC</td>\n   <td>STX</td>\n   <td>38%</td>\n   <td>48%</td>\n   <td>14%</td>\n   <td>$74.93</td>\n   <td>$74.83</td>\n   <td>0%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Intel Corp.</td>\n   <td>INTC</td>\n   <td>37%</td>\n   <td>39%</td>\n   <td>24%</td>\n   <td>$62.25</td>\n   <td>$63.93</td>\n   <td>3%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Xerox Holdings Corp.</td>\n   <td>XRX</td>\n   <td>0%</td>\n   <td>38%</td>\n   <td>62%</td>\n   <td>$26.53</td>\n   <td>$18.00</td>\n   <td>-32%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NortonLifeLock Inc.</td>\n   <td>NLOK</td>\n   <td>50%</td>\n   <td>50%</td>\n   <td>0%</td>\n   <td>$21.01</td>\n   <td>$25.88</td>\n   <td>23%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Western Digital Corp.</td>\n   <td>WDC</td>\n   <td>66%</td>\n   <td>31%</td>\n   <td>3%</td>\n   <td>$66.58</td>\n   <td>$71.35</td>\n   <td>7%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Micron Technology Inc.</td>\n   <td>MU</td>\n   <td>82%</td>\n   <td>18%</td>\n   <td>0%</td>\n   <td>$85.41</td>\n   <td>$112.26</td>\n   <td>31%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Cisco Systems Inc.</td>\n   <td>CSCO</td>\n   <td>46%</td>\n   <td>54%</td>\n   <td>0%</td>\n   <td>$48.29</td>\n   <td>$51.90</td>\n   <td>7%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Juniper Networks Inc.</td>\n   <td>JNPR</td>\n   <td>24%</td>\n   <td>57%</td>\n   <td>19%</td>\n   <td>$24.69</td>\n   <td>$25.05</td>\n   <td>1%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Oracle Corp.</td>\n   <td>ORCL</td>\n   <td>37%</td>\n   <td>56%</td>\n   <td>7%</td>\n   <td>$72.12</td>\n   <td>$72.35</td>\n   <td>0%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>NetApp Inc.</td>\n   <td>NTAP</td>\n   <td>46%</td>\n   <td>46%</td>\n   <td>8%</td>\n   <td>$66.66</td>\n   <td>$74.77</td>\n   <td>12%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Qorvo Inc.</td>\n   <td>QRVO</td>\n   <td>65%</td>\n   <td>35%</td>\n   <td>0%</td>\n   <td>$165.37</td>\n   <td>$196.52</td>\n   <td>19%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Broadcom Inc.</td>\n   <td>AVGO</td>\n   <td>81%</td>\n   <td>16%</td>\n   <td>3%</td>\n   <td>$437.59</td>\n   <td>$512.83</td>\n   <td>17%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Skyworks Solutions Inc.</td>\n   <td>SWKS</td>\n   <td>57%</td>\n   <td>43%</td>\n   <td>0%</td>\n   <td>$167.66</td>\n   <td>$202.44</td>\n   <td>21%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Qualcomm Inc.</td>\n   <td>QCOM</td>\n   <td>70%</td>\n   <td>27%</td>\n   <td>3%</td>\n   <td>$127.87</td>\n   <td>$171.90</td>\n   <td>34%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Akamai Technologies Inc.</td>\n   <td>AKAM</td>\n   <td>67%</td>\n   <td>28%</td>\n   <td>5%</td>\n   <td>$96.36</td>\n   <td>$123.69</td>\n   <td>28%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Applied Materials Inc.</td>\n   <td>AMAT</td>\n   <td>84%</td>\n   <td>16%</td>\n   <td>0%</td>\n   <td>$112.68</td>\n   <td>$136.83</td>\n   <td>21%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>F5 Networks Inc.</td>\n   <td>FFIV</td>\n   <td>50%</td>\n   <td>50%</td>\n   <td>0%</td>\n   <td>$191.70</td>\n   <td>$220.13</td>\n   <td>15%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp. Class A</td>\n   <td>CTSH</td>\n   <td>48%</td>\n   <td>42%</td>\n   <td>10%</td>\n   <td>$76.02</td>\n   <td>$85.19</td>\n   <td>12%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Microchip Technology Inc.</td>\n   <td>MCHP</td>\n   <td>79%</td>\n   <td>21%</td>\n   <td>0%</td>\n   <td>$141.32</td>\n   <td>$170.52</td>\n   <td>21%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Corning Inc.</td>\n   <td>GLW</td>\n   <td>57%</td>\n   <td>43%</td>\n   <td>0%</td>\n   <td>$38.97</td>\n   <td>$41.29</td>\n   <td>6%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>KLA Corp.</td>\n   <td>KLAC</td>\n   <td>45%</td>\n   <td>55%</td>\n   <td>0%</td>\n   <td>$283.45</td>\n   <td>$320.12</td>\n   <td>13%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Lam Research Corp.</td>\n   <td>LRCX</td>\n   <td>76%</td>\n   <td>20%</td>\n   <td>4%</td>\n   <td>$518.70</td>\n   <td>$593.68</td>\n   <td>14%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Motorola Solutions Inc.</td>\n   <td>MSI</td>\n   <td>75%</td>\n   <td>25%</td>\n   <td>0%</td>\n   <td>$177.76</td>\n   <td>$204.78</td>\n   <td>15%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Citrix Systems Inc.</td>\n   <td>CTXS</td>\n   <td>53%</td>\n   <td>47%</td>\n   <td>0%</td>\n   <td>$131.78</td>\n   <td>$159.23</td>\n   <td>21%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>TE Connectivity Ltd.</td>\n   <td>TEL</td>\n   <td>60%</td>\n   <td>35%</td>\n   <td>5%</td>\n   <td>$130.09</td>\n   <td>$136.50</td>\n   <td>5%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>CDW Corp.</td>\n   <td>CDW</td>\n   <td>73%</td>\n   <td>18%</td>\n   <td>9%</td>\n   <td>$156.44</td>\n   <td>$169.56</td>\n   <td>8%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Electronic Arts Inc.</td>\n   <td>EA</td>\n   <td>62%</td>\n   <td>38%</td>\n   <td>0%</td>\n   <td>$130.12</td>\n   <td>$158.83</td>\n   <td>22%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Teradyne Inc.</td>\n   <td>TER</td>\n   <td>61%</td>\n   <td>33%</td>\n   <td>6%</td>\n   <td>$108.91</td>\n   <td>$136.89</td>\n   <td>26%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Fiserv Inc.</td>\n   <td>FISV</td>\n   <td>86%</td>\n   <td>11%</td>\n   <td>3%</td>\n   <td>$123.86</td>\n   <td>$136.55</td>\n   <td>10%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Fidelity National Information Services Inc.</td>\n   <td>FIS</td>\n   <td>74%</td>\n   <td>26%</td>\n   <td>0%</td>\n   <td>$145.52</td>\n   <td>$160.44</td>\n   <td>10%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Fleetcor Technologies Inc.</td>\n   <td>FLT</td>\n   <td>62%</td>\n   <td>38%</td>\n   <td>0%</td>\n   <td>$285.37</td>\n   <td>$299.16</td>\n   <td>5%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Flir Systems Inc.</td>\n   <td>FLIR</td>\n   <td>0%</td>\n   <td>100%</td>\n   <td>0%</td>\n   <td>$54.59</td>\n   <td>$55.17</td>\n   <td>1%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Facebook Inc. Class A</td>\n   <td>FB</td>\n   <td>86%</td>\n   <td>10%</td>\n   <td>4%</td>\n   <td>$264.90</td>\n   <td>$340.40</td>\n   <td>29%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Keysight Technologies Inc.</td>\n   <td>KEYS</td>\n   <td>85%</td>\n   <td>15%</td>\n   <td>0%</td>\n   <td>$135.28</td>\n   <td>$164.77</td>\n   <td>22%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Analog Devices Inc.</td>\n   <td>ADI</td>\n   <td>83%</td>\n   <td>17%</td>\n   <td>0%</td>\n   <td>$147.11</td>\n   <td>$181.55</td>\n   <td>23%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Activision Blizzard Inc.</td>\n   <td>ATVI</td>\n   <td>82%</td>\n   <td>15%</td>\n   <td>3%</td>\n   <td>$91.31</td>\n   <td>$113.32</td>\n   <td>24%</td>\n  </tr>\n  <tr>\n   <td>Texas Instruments Inc.</td>\n   <td>TXN</td>\n   <td>43%</td>\n   <td>40%</td>\n   <td>17%</td>\n   <td>$169.42</td>\n   <td>$184.80</td>\n   <td>9%</td>\n  </tr>\n </tbody>\n</table>\n<p>FactSet</p>\n<p>Scroll the table to the right to see the price targets.</p>\n<p>The analysts see double-digit upside potential for 25 of the 43 stocks over the next 12 months, with Qualcomm in the lead. Among the analysts polled by FactSet, 70% rate Qualcomm a “buy” or the equivalent. And the consensus price target implies 34% upside for the stock.</p>\n<p>The listed stock with the highest percentage of “buy” or equivalent ratings is Facebook, at 86%. The analysts expect the stock to rise 29% over the next year.</p>","source":"market_watch","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Don’t be fooled by the ‘value’ tag on these tech stocks. Many can provide plenty of growth too</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nDon’t be fooled by the ‘value’ tag on these tech stocks. Many can provide plenty of growth too\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-03-12 18:00 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.marketwatch.com/story/dont-be-fooled-by-the-value-tag-on-these-tech-stocks-many-can-provide-plenty-of-growth-too-11615484802?mod=home-page><strong>MarketWatch</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Facebook, Oracle and Micron Technology are reasonably valued when considering the outlook for their sales growth.\nWith another round of federal stimulus on the way and expectations for solid growth ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/dont-be-fooled-by-the-value-tag-on-these-tech-stocks-many-can-provide-plenty-of-growth-too-11615484802?mod=home-page\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","TWTR":"Twitter","ORCL":"甲骨文",".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite","INTC":"英特尔"},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/dont-be-fooled-by-the-value-tag-on-these-tech-stocks-many-can-provide-plenty-of-growth-too-11615484802?mod=home-page","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/599a65733b8245fcf7868668ef9ad712","article_id":"1155506399","content_text":"Facebook, Oracle and Micron Technology are reasonably valued when considering the outlook for their sales growth.\nWith another round of federal stimulus on the way and expectations for solid growth for the U.S. economy this year, value stocks have been rallying. Stocks with low valuations tend to do well during economic growth phases.\nMark DeCambre underlined the value rallyby pointing out that the Dow Jones Industrial Average ended at a record high Dec. 10, while the Nasdaq Composite Index was still in a correction.\nBut what about tech stocks? There’s plenty of value there too, as you can see in the screen below.\nEconomists polled by MarketWatch expect the U.S. economy to expand by 6% in 2021. Yes, that’s coming off a 3.5% contraction in 2020, according to the latest estimate from the Bureau of Economic Analysis. But the 2021 growth rate would be the fastest since 1984, according to World Bank data.\nTech value stock screen\nThere are several definitions of value stocks, but generally they are those that trade at lower valuations to earnings and typically grow their sales at a slower pace. That said, an individual value stock might also be considered a growth stock. This is illustrated by the Russell indexes.\nThe Russell 1000 Index is made up of the 1,000 largest publicly traded U.S. companies by market capitalization and is reconstituted each year in June. Selected from the Russell 1000 are the Russell 1000 Value Index,which has 849 stocks, and the Russell 1000 Growth Index,which has 453 stocks. The groups overlap, with 291 stocks in both. You can read how FTSE Russell describes the makeup of its indexeshere.\nSo an easy way to play value at this time is to buy shares of an exchange traded fund that tracks the Russell 1000 Value Index,such as the iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF or the Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF.As always, do your own research on any investment you consider to make an informed decisions.\nFor a large-cap technology value screen, we started with the information technology sector of the S&P 500 Index.Here’s how this sector’s weighted aggregate forward price-to-earnings ratio has increased over the past five years:\n(FACTSET)\nThe sector’s forward P/E his risen to 25.4.\nThis doesn’t mean “expensive” tech stocks can’t be excellent investments. Salesforce.com was trading at a forward P/E of 68.7 five years ago, and the stock has nearly tripled since then.\nGetting back to the S&P 500 tech value screen, we then added tech-oriented stocks in the communications services sector, including videogame developers and Facebook Inc.,Alphabet Inc.,Netflix Inc. and Twitter Inc..That brought the list up to 82 stocks. Two of the videogame developers made the cut, but among the four companies named above, only Facebook had a low enough P/E to pass the screen.\nHere are the 43 S&P 500 tech companies that trade below the tech sector’s forward P/E of 25.4:\n\n\n\nCOMPANY\nTICKER\nINDUSTRY\nFORWARD P/E\nFORWARD PRICE/SALES\nESTIMATED OPERATING MARGIN - 2020\nEXPECTED SALES GROWTH - 2021\nESTIMATED SALES GROWTH - 2020\nDIVIDEND YIELD\n\n\n\n\nHEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE CO.\nHPE\nCOMPUTER PROCESSING HARDWARE\n8.5\n0.7\n15.93%\n2%\n-6%\n3.17%\n\n\nDXC Technology Co.\nDXC\nData Processing Services\n9.1\n0.4\n11.83%\n-6%\n-8%\n0.00%\n\n\nHP Inc.\nHPQ\nComputer Processing Hardware\n9.6\n0.6\n8.58%\n5%\n-2%\n2.56%\n\n\nInternational Business Machines Corp.\nIBM\nInformation Technology Services\n11.5\n1.5\n22.24%\n1%\n-5%\n5.10%\n\n\nWestern Union Company\nWU\nFinance/Rental/Leasing\n12.0\n2.0\n25.48%\n6%\n-8%\n3.82%\n\n\nVontier Corp\nVNT\nOther Transportation\n12.7\n1.9\n23.54%\n2%\nN/A\n0.00%\n\n\nSeagate Technology PLC\nSTX\nComputer Peripherals\n12.9\n1.6\n16.69%\n2%\n1%\n3.58%\n\n\nIntel Corp.\nINTC\nSemiconductors\n13.1\n3.5\n46.12%\n-7%\n8%\n2.23%\n\n\nXerox Holdings Corp.\nXRX\nComputer Peripherals\n13.2\n0.7\n9.57%\n1%\n-23%\n3.77%\n\n\nNortonLifeLock Inc.\nNLOK\nPackaged Software\n13.3\n4.6\n45.97%\n5%\n-17%\n2.38%\n\n\nWestern Digital Corp.\nWDC\nComputer Peripherals\n13.6\n1.2\n13.77%\n5%\n-1%\n0.00%\n\n\nMicron Technology Inc.\nMU\nSemiconductors\n14.0\n3.4\n42.02%\n24%\n1%\n0.00%\n\n\nCisco Systems Inc.\nCSCO\nInformation Technology Services\n14.5\n4.0\n31.85%\n1%\n-3%\n3.06%\n\n\nJuniper Networks Inc.\nJNPR\nInformation Technology Services\n14.9\n1.8\n14.68%\n4%\n0%\n3.24%\n\n\nOracle Corp.\nORCL\nPackaged Software\n15.4\n5.2\n45.99%\n3%\n2%\n1.77%\n\n\nNetApp Inc.\nNTAP\nComputer Peripherals\n15.5\n2.5\n20.87%\n5%\n-1%\n2.88%\n\n\nQorvo Inc.\nQRVO\nSemiconductors\n16.0\n4.3\n33.32%\n12%\n19%\n0.00%\n\n\nBroadcom Inc.\nAVGO\nSemiconductors\n16.0\n6.6\n48.55%\n11%\n7%\n3.29%\n\n\nSkyworks Solutions Inc.\nSWKS\nSemiconductors\n17.1\n5.8\n39.24%\n32%\n11%\n1.19%\n\n\nQualcomm Inc.\nQCOM\nTelecommunications Equipment\n17.3\n4.6\n34.20%\n32%\n20%\n2.03%\n\n\nAkamai Technologies Inc.\nAKAM\nInternet Software/Services\n17.8\n4.6\n36.90%\n7%\n11%\n0.00%\n\n\nApplied Materials Inc.\nAMAT\nIndustrial Machinery\n18.3\n4.7\n27.95%\n22%\n19%\n0.78%\n\n\nF5 Networks Inc.\nFFIV\nComputer Communications\n18.5\n4.6\n23.93%\n8%\n6%\n0.00%\n\n\nCognizant Technology Solutions Corp. Class A\nCTSH\nInformation Technology Services\n19.2\n2.3\n17.33%\n7%\n-1%\n1.26%\n\n\nMicrochip Technology Inc.\nMCHP\nSemiconductors\n19.3\n6.3\n38.76%\n10%\n2%\n1.10%\n\n\nCorning Inc.\nGLW\nElectronic Components\n19.9\n2.3\n24.82%\n14%\n-2%\n2.46%\n\n\nKLA Corp.\nKLAC\nElectronic Production Equipment\n20.0\n6.3\n38.69%\n10%\n21%\n1.27%\n\n\nLam Research Corp.\nLRCX\nElectronic Production Equipment\n20.1\n5.1\n31.05%\n19%\n23%\n1.00%\n\n\nMotorola Solutions Inc.\nMSI\nAerospace & Defense\n20.4\n3.8\n25.63%\n8%\n-6%\n1.60%\n\n\nCitrix Systems Inc.\nCTXS\nPackaged Software\n20.7\n4.8\n25.60%\n4%\n8%\n1.12%\n\n\nTE Connectivity Ltd.\nTEL\nElectronic Components\n21.9\n3.1\n20.96%\n12%\n-4%\n1.48%\n\n\nCDW Corp.\nCDW\nInformation Technology Services\n22.0\n1.1\n8.73%\n6%\n2%\n1.02%\n\n\nElectronic Arts Inc.\nEA\nRecreational Products\n22.2\n5.9\n25.35%\n7%\n14%\n0.52%\n\n\nTeradyne Inc.\nTER\nElectronic Production Equipment\n22.5\n5.5\n32.80%\n6%\n36%\n0.37%\n\n\nFiserv Inc.\nFISV\nData Processing Services\n22.9\n5.5\n33.83%\n9%\n-4%\n0.00%\n\n\nFidelity National Information Services Inc.\nFIS\nData Processing Services\n22.9\n6.6\n41.91%\n9%\n21%\n1.07%\n\n\nFleetcor Technologies Inc.\nFLT\nMiscellaneous Commercial Services\n22.9\n9.0\n55.51%\n11%\n-10%\n0.00%\n\n\nFlir Systems Inc.\nFLIR\nAerospace & Defense\n23.1\n3.7\n23.00%\n0%\n2%\n1.25%\n\n\nFacebook Inc. Class A\nFB\nInternet Software/Services\n23.2\n7.0\n45.99%\n25%\n22%\n0.00%\n\n\nKeysight Technologies Inc.\nKEYS\nElectronic Equipment/Instruments\n23.4\n5.1\n25.57%\n13%\n1%\n0.00%\n\n\nAnalog Devices Inc.\nADI\nSemiconductors\n23.9\n8.2\n43.13%\n14%\n-3%\n1.88%\n\n\nActivision Blizzard Inc.\nATVI\nRecreational Products\n25.0\n8.3\n41.32%\n1%\n32%\n0.51%\n\n\nTexas Instruments Inc.\nTXN\nSemiconductors\n25.2\n9.4\n47.78%\n15%\n1%\n2.41%\n\n\n\nFactSet\nScroll the table to see all the data, including sales growth estimates and dividend yields.\nA note about the data: The operating margin and sales growth figures for 2020 are marked “estimated” because many companies have fiscal years that don’t match the calendar. So the figures are based on consensus estimates for calendar 2020 among analyst polled by FactSet. For Micron Technology Inc.,the 2020 sales growth figure is for the past four reported fiscal quarters through Dec. 3.\nThe curious case of Facebook\nYou might wonder about Facebook, which lives in both the value and growth worlds. Its forward P/E valuation of 23.2 is relatively low. But Facebook is very much a growth stock — sales increased 22% last year, and analysts expect even better revenue growth of 25% in 2021.\nFacebook trades for seven times the consensus forward sales estimate, compared to a forward price-to-sales estimate of 5.9 for the entire S&P 500 tech sector. But that “high” price-to-sales ratio may not be so important because it is such a profitable company. Its 2020 operating margin of 50% is among the highest on the list.\nCody Willard called Facebook a bargain, not only because of its low P/E valuation but because of the long-term growth path for its Oculus virtual-reality hardware and software.\nThere are 16 companies on the list that are expected to produce double-digit increases in sales in 2021, including Skyworks Solutions Inc. and Qualcomm Inc..Both are expected to grow their revenues by 21% this year.\n‘Old tech’\nOracle Corp. is an “old tech” company that can be considered a value stock, as it trades for only 15.4 times the consensus earnings estimate for the next 12 months among analysts polled by FactSet. The company reported better-than-expected results for its fiscal third quarter after the close March 10 and increased its quarterly dividend by a third. Then on March 11, the stock fell as much as 9%. That “sell the good news” reaction may not be much of a surprise, as the stock had risen 48% over the previous year through March 10.\nInternational Business Machines Corp. is one of the cheapest stocks on the list, based on its forward P/E ratio of 11.5. The stock was up 2% from a year earlier through the close March 10. It has an attractive dividend yield of 5.10% that is supported by strong free cash flow.\nVictoria Greene, a portfolio manager at G Squared Private Wealth in College Station, Texas,may have been a bit early when naming IBM as an excellent long-term play in June. But in a recent interview, she said she was still confident that there was a lot of upside for IBM “as a turnaround story and reinventing themselves,” in light of its July 2019 acquisition of Red Hat and the strength of its Watson artificial-intelligence software platform.\nWall Street’s price targets\nLeaving the list of 43 tech value stocks in the same order, here’s a summary of opinion among analysts polled by FactSet:\n\n\n\nCOMPANY\nTICKER\nSHARE \"BUY\" RATINGS\nSHARE NEUTRAL RATINGS\nSHARE \"SELL\" RATINGS\nCLOSING PRICE - MARCH 10\nCONSENSUS PRICE TARGET\nIMPLIED 12-MONTH UPSIDE POTENTIAL\n\n\n\n\nHEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE CO.\nHPE\n33%\n57%\n10%\n$15.15\n$15.46\n2%\n\n\nDXC Technology Co.\nDXC\n29%\n71%\n0%\n$29.00\n$30.43\n5%\n\n\nHP Inc.\nHPQ\n39%\n39%\n22%\n$30.26\n$30.63\n1%\n\n\nInternational Business Machines Corp.\nIBM\n31%\n56%\n13%\n$127.87\n$136.93\n7%\n\n\nWestern Union Company\nWU\n18%\n59%\n23%\n$24.60\n$25.14\n2%\n\n\nVontier Corp\nVNT\n73%\n27%\n0%\n$30.94\n$39.56\n28%\n\n\nSeagate Technology PLC\nSTX\n38%\n48%\n14%\n$74.93\n$74.83\n0%\n\n\nIntel Corp.\nINTC\n37%\n39%\n24%\n$62.25\n$63.93\n3%\n\n\nXerox Holdings Corp.\nXRX\n0%\n38%\n62%\n$26.53\n$18.00\n-32%\n\n\nNortonLifeLock Inc.\nNLOK\n50%\n50%\n0%\n$21.01\n$25.88\n23%\n\n\nWestern Digital Corp.\nWDC\n66%\n31%\n3%\n$66.58\n$71.35\n7%\n\n\nMicron Technology Inc.\nMU\n82%\n18%\n0%\n$85.41\n$112.26\n31%\n\n\nCisco Systems Inc.\nCSCO\n46%\n54%\n0%\n$48.29\n$51.90\n7%\n\n\nJuniper Networks Inc.\nJNPR\n24%\n57%\n19%\n$24.69\n$25.05\n1%\n\n\nOracle Corp.\nORCL\n37%\n56%\n7%\n$72.12\n$72.35\n0%\n\n\nNetApp Inc.\nNTAP\n46%\n46%\n8%\n$66.66\n$74.77\n12%\n\n\nQorvo Inc.\nQRVO\n65%\n35%\n0%\n$165.37\n$196.52\n19%\n\n\nBroadcom Inc.\nAVGO\n81%\n16%\n3%\n$437.59\n$512.83\n17%\n\n\nSkyworks Solutions Inc.\nSWKS\n57%\n43%\n0%\n$167.66\n$202.44\n21%\n\n\nQualcomm Inc.\nQCOM\n70%\n27%\n3%\n$127.87\n$171.90\n34%\n\n\nAkamai Technologies Inc.\nAKAM\n67%\n28%\n5%\n$96.36\n$123.69\n28%\n\n\nApplied Materials Inc.\nAMAT\n84%\n16%\n0%\n$112.68\n$136.83\n21%\n\n\nF5 Networks Inc.\nFFIV\n50%\n50%\n0%\n$191.70\n$220.13\n15%\n\n\nCognizant Technology Solutions Corp. Class A\nCTSH\n48%\n42%\n10%\n$76.02\n$85.19\n12%\n\n\nMicrochip Technology Inc.\nMCHP\n79%\n21%\n0%\n$141.32\n$170.52\n21%\n\n\nCorning Inc.\nGLW\n57%\n43%\n0%\n$38.97\n$41.29\n6%\n\n\nKLA Corp.\nKLAC\n45%\n55%\n0%\n$283.45\n$320.12\n13%\n\n\nLam Research Corp.\nLRCX\n76%\n20%\n4%\n$518.70\n$593.68\n14%\n\n\nMotorola Solutions Inc.\nMSI\n75%\n25%\n0%\n$177.76\n$204.78\n15%\n\n\nCitrix Systems Inc.\nCTXS\n53%\n47%\n0%\n$131.78\n$159.23\n21%\n\n\nTE Connectivity Ltd.\nTEL\n60%\n35%\n5%\n$130.09\n$136.50\n5%\n\n\nCDW Corp.\nCDW\n73%\n18%\n9%\n$156.44\n$169.56\n8%\n\n\nElectronic Arts Inc.\nEA\n62%\n38%\n0%\n$130.12\n$158.83\n22%\n\n\nTeradyne Inc.\nTER\n61%\n33%\n6%\n$108.91\n$136.89\n26%\n\n\nFiserv Inc.\nFISV\n86%\n11%\n3%\n$123.86\n$136.55\n10%\n\n\nFidelity National Information Services Inc.\nFIS\n74%\n26%\n0%\n$145.52\n$160.44\n10%\n\n\nFleetcor Technologies Inc.\nFLT\n62%\n38%\n0%\n$285.37\n$299.16\n5%\n\n\nFlir Systems Inc.\nFLIR\n0%\n100%\n0%\n$54.59\n$55.17\n1%\n\n\nFacebook Inc. Class A\nFB\n86%\n10%\n4%\n$264.90\n$340.40\n29%\n\n\nKeysight Technologies Inc.\nKEYS\n85%\n15%\n0%\n$135.28\n$164.77\n22%\n\n\nAnalog Devices Inc.\nADI\n83%\n17%\n0%\n$147.11\n$181.55\n23%\n\n\nActivision Blizzard Inc.\nATVI\n82%\n15%\n3%\n$91.31\n$113.32\n24%\n\n\nTexas Instruments Inc.\nTXN\n43%\n40%\n17%\n$169.42\n$184.80\n9%\n\n\n\nFactSet\nScroll the table to the right to see the price targets.\nThe analysts see double-digit upside potential for 25 of the 43 stocks over the next 12 months, with Qualcomm in the lead. Among the analysts polled by FactSet, 70% rate Qualcomm a “buy” or the equivalent. And the consensus price target implies 34% upside for the stock.\nThe listed stock with the highest percentage of “buy” or equivalent ratings is Facebook, at 86%. The analysts expect the stock to rise 29% over the next year.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":449,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":359566776,"gmtCreate":1616414141795,"gmtModify":1704793715018,"author":{"id":"3577498455923590","authorId":"3577498455923590","name":"n57tpt9U2","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0796a20219fda5104c45929cfeb79aa8","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577498455923590","authorIdStr":"3577498455923590"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good...","listText":"Good...","text":"Good...","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/359566776","repostId":"2121124923","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2121124923","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1616412000,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2121124923?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-03-22 19:20","market":"us","language":"en","title":"U.S. senators press Biden to set end date for gas-powered car sales","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2121124923","media":"Reuters","summary":"WASHINGTON  -  California's two U.S. senators are urging President Joe Biden to set a firm date to phase-out gas-powered passenger vehicles as the White House grapples with how to rewrite vehicle emissions rules slashed under President Donald Trump.In an unreported letter going to Biden Monday, Democratic Senators Alex Padilla and Dianne Feinstein called on Biden \"to follow California’s lead and set a date by which all new cars and passenger trucks sold be zero-emission vehicles.\" They also urge","content":"<p>WASHINGTON (Reuters) -  California's two U.S. senators are urging President Joe Biden to set a firm date to phase-out gas-powered passenger vehicles as the White House grapples with how to rewrite vehicle emissions rules slashed under President Donald Trump.</p><p>In an unreported letter going to Biden Monday, Democratic Senators Alex Padilla and Dianne Feinstein called on Biden \"to follow California’s lead and set a date by which all new cars and passenger trucks sold be zero-emission vehicles.\" They also urged Biden to restore California's authority to set clean car standards.</p><p>In September, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed an executive order directing the state's air resources agency to require all new cars and passenger trucks sold in California to be zero-emission by 2035.</p><p>Biden's campaign in 2020 declined to endorse a specific date to end gas-powered vehicle sales, but he has vowed to dramatically boost electric vehicles and charging stations.</p><p>In January, Biden said the administration would replace the federal government's fleet of 650,000 vehicles \"with clean electric vehicles made right here in America made by American workers.\"</p><p>The senators also say Biden should use a compromise deal that California struck with automakers including Ford Motor Co, Honda Motor, BMW AG and Volkswagen AG that falls between the Trump administration and Obama-era requirements.</p><p>\"We believe the national baseline should, at an absolute minimum, be built around the technical lead set by companies that voluntarily advanced their agreements with California,\" Padilla, who replaced Vice President Kamala Harris in the Senate, and Feinstein wrote in the letter seen by Reuters. \"California and other states need a strong federal partner.\"</p><p>Shortly after taking office, Biden ordered U.S. agencies to revisit fuel efficiency standards by July.</p><p>The Trump administration in March 2020 finalized a rollback of fuel economy standards to require 1.5% annual increases in efficiency through 2026, well below the 5% yearly boosts in Obama-administration rules it discarded.</p><p>Then President Donald Trump repeatedly targeted California, a Democratic bastion that tangled with Trump on multiple fronts during his tenure.</p><p>The Center for Biological Diversity estimates the California deal improves fuel economy 3.7% year over year between 2022-2026.</p><p>Biden also directed the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration by April to reconsider Trump’s 2019 decision to revoke California’s authority to set its own auto tailpipe emissions standards and require rising numbers of zero-emission vehicles.</p><p>A White House spokesman declined to comment Sunday on the timing of any announcement on California's vehicle authority.</p><p>California's vehicle emissions standards are followed by 13 other states and the District of Columbia accounting for more than 40% of the U.S. population.</p><p>In January, General Motors said it aspires to end all gasoline passenger car and truck sales by 2035. Volvo, a unit of Zhejiang Geely Holding Group, said its entire car line-up will be fully electric by 2030 and Ford's European lineup will also be fully electric by 2030.</p><p>The Alliance for Automotive Innovation, a trade group representing major automakers, declined comment Sunday but last month backed nationwide rules to achieve vehicle emissions reductions roughly midway between the Trump and Obama standards.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>U.S. senators press Biden to set end date for gas-powered car sales</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nU.S. senators press Biden to set end date for gas-powered car sales\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-03-22 19:20</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>WASHINGTON (Reuters) -  California's two U.S. senators are urging President Joe Biden to set a firm date to phase-out gas-powered passenger vehicles as the White House grapples with how to rewrite vehicle emissions rules slashed under President Donald Trump.</p><p>In an unreported letter going to Biden Monday, Democratic Senators Alex Padilla and Dianne Feinstein called on Biden \"to follow California’s lead and set a date by which all new cars and passenger trucks sold be zero-emission vehicles.\" They also urged Biden to restore California's authority to set clean car standards.</p><p>In September, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed an executive order directing the state's air resources agency to require all new cars and passenger trucks sold in California to be zero-emission by 2035.</p><p>Biden's campaign in 2020 declined to endorse a specific date to end gas-powered vehicle sales, but he has vowed to dramatically boost electric vehicles and charging stations.</p><p>In January, Biden said the administration would replace the federal government's fleet of 650,000 vehicles \"with clean electric vehicles made right here in America made by American workers.\"</p><p>The senators also say Biden should use a compromise deal that California struck with automakers including Ford Motor Co, Honda Motor, BMW AG and Volkswagen AG that falls between the Trump administration and Obama-era requirements.</p><p>\"We believe the national baseline should, at an absolute minimum, be built around the technical lead set by companies that voluntarily advanced their agreements with California,\" Padilla, who replaced Vice President Kamala Harris in the Senate, and Feinstein wrote in the letter seen by Reuters. \"California and other states need a strong federal partner.\"</p><p>Shortly after taking office, Biden ordered U.S. agencies to revisit fuel efficiency standards by July.</p><p>The Trump administration in March 2020 finalized a rollback of fuel economy standards to require 1.5% annual increases in efficiency through 2026, well below the 5% yearly boosts in Obama-administration rules it discarded.</p><p>Then President Donald Trump repeatedly targeted California, a Democratic bastion that tangled with Trump on multiple fronts during his tenure.</p><p>The Center for Biological Diversity estimates the California deal improves fuel economy 3.7% year over year between 2022-2026.</p><p>Biden also directed the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration by April to reconsider Trump’s 2019 decision to revoke California’s authority to set its own auto tailpipe emissions standards and require rising numbers of zero-emission vehicles.</p><p>A White House spokesman declined to comment Sunday on the timing of any announcement on California's vehicle authority.</p><p>California's vehicle emissions standards are followed by 13 other states and the District of Columbia accounting for more than 40% of the U.S. population.</p><p>In January, General Motors said it aspires to end all gasoline passenger car and truck sales by 2035. Volvo, a unit of Zhejiang Geely Holding Group, said its entire car line-up will be fully electric by 2030 and Ford's European lineup will also be fully electric by 2030.</p><p>The Alliance for Automotive Innovation, a trade group representing major automakers, declined comment Sunday but last month backed nationwide rules to achieve vehicle emissions reductions roughly midway between the Trump and Obama standards.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"F":"福特汽车","GM":"通用汽车","TSLA":"特斯拉"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2121124923","content_text":"WASHINGTON (Reuters) -  California's two U.S. senators are urging President Joe Biden to set a firm date to phase-out gas-powered passenger vehicles as the White House grapples with how to rewrite vehicle emissions rules slashed under President Donald Trump.In an unreported letter going to Biden Monday, Democratic Senators Alex Padilla and Dianne Feinstein called on Biden \"to follow California’s lead and set a date by which all new cars and passenger trucks sold be zero-emission vehicles.\" They also urged Biden to restore California's authority to set clean car standards.In September, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed an executive order directing the state's air resources agency to require all new cars and passenger trucks sold in California to be zero-emission by 2035.Biden's campaign in 2020 declined to endorse a specific date to end gas-powered vehicle sales, but he has vowed to dramatically boost electric vehicles and charging stations.In January, Biden said the administration would replace the federal government's fleet of 650,000 vehicles \"with clean electric vehicles made right here in America made by American workers.\"The senators also say Biden should use a compromise deal that California struck with automakers including Ford Motor Co, Honda Motor, BMW AG and Volkswagen AG that falls between the Trump administration and Obama-era requirements.\"We believe the national baseline should, at an absolute minimum, be built around the technical lead set by companies that voluntarily advanced their agreements with California,\" Padilla, who replaced Vice President Kamala Harris in the Senate, and Feinstein wrote in the letter seen by Reuters. \"California and other states need a strong federal partner.\"Shortly after taking office, Biden ordered U.S. agencies to revisit fuel efficiency standards by July.The Trump administration in March 2020 finalized a rollback of fuel economy standards to require 1.5% annual increases in efficiency through 2026, well below the 5% yearly boosts in Obama-administration rules it discarded.Then President Donald Trump repeatedly targeted California, a Democratic bastion that tangled with Trump on multiple fronts during his tenure.The Center for Biological Diversity estimates the California deal improves fuel economy 3.7% year over year between 2022-2026.Biden also directed the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration by April to reconsider Trump’s 2019 decision to revoke California’s authority to set its own auto tailpipe emissions standards and require rising numbers of zero-emission vehicles.A White House spokesman declined to comment Sunday on the timing of any announcement on California's vehicle authority.California's vehicle emissions standards are followed by 13 other states and the District of Columbia accounting for more than 40% of the U.S. population.In January, General Motors said it aspires to end all gasoline passenger car and truck sales by 2035. Volvo, a unit of Zhejiang Geely Holding Group, said its entire car line-up will be fully electric by 2030 and Ford's European lineup will also be fully electric by 2030.The Alliance for Automotive Innovation, a trade group representing major automakers, declined comment Sunday but last month backed nationwide rules to achieve vehicle emissions reductions roughly midway between the Trump and Obama standards.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":349,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":322852378,"gmtCreate":1615797754994,"gmtModify":1704786609546,"author":{"id":"3577498455923590","authorId":"3577498455923590","name":"n57tpt9U2","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0796a20219fda5104c45929cfeb79aa8","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577498455923590","authorIdStr":"3577498455923590"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Up up up","listText":"Up up up","text":"Up up up","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/322852378","repostId":"1147986042","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1147986042","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1615796815,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1147986042?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-03-15 16:26","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Nio Stock Looks as if It Is Going to Stay Volatile for a While","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1147986042","media":"InvestorPlace","summary":"The warning lights are still flashing on Nio stockNio (NYSE:NIO) stock has been decelerating lately.","content":"<p>The warning lights are still flashing on Nio stock</p><p><b>Nio</b>&nbsp;(NYSE:<b><u>NIO</u></b>) stock has been decelerating lately. Since early February, the shares have plunged from $60 to $45 — putting the market capitalization at $72 billion.&nbsp;Of course, NIO stock is still well above its low for the past 52 weeks, which was a mere $2 per share.</p><p>The fact is that this Chinese electric car operator has been able to pull off a stellar turnaround.&nbsp; Another catalyst has been the rebound in the economy.</p><p>Yet the EV (Electric Vehicle) sector is going through a re-assessment from Wall Street. Of course, there has been tremendous selling pressure on other companies like&nbsp;<b>Tesla</b>&nbsp;(NASDAQ:<b><u>TSLA</u></b>),<b>Xpeng</b>&nbsp;(NYSE:<b><u>XPEV</u></b>) and&nbsp;<b>Li Auto</b>&nbsp;(NASDAQ:<b><u>LI</u></b>).</p><p>OK then, what’s next? Could this be a buying opportunity? Or should investors hold off on NIO stock for now?</p><p>Here’s a look:</p><p><b>The Fundamentals and NIO Stock</b></p><p>Nio certainly had a robust fourth quarter. Revenues soared by 148% to $1.02 billion and the net loss was 14 cents a share, compared to a loss of 39 cents a share in the same period a year ago. The gross margin swung from -8.9% to 17.2%.</p><p>In terms of the balance sheet, it got stronger as well. The cash balance went from&nbsp;$3.3 billion to $6.5 billion on a sequential basis. The company was smart to raise some capital when NIO stock was surging.</p><p>But of course, expectations were extremely positive going into the earnings report. Thus, it really should not be any surprise that there was disappointment on Wall Street.</p><p><b>The Issues</b></p><p>Now there was something in the report that was a red flag – that is, the deliveries for January came in over 7,200. This was below the 7,400 needed to hit its quarterly objectives.</p><p>One reason for this could be the Lunar New Year holiday, in which a large part of the China essentially shuts down. But there may be another factor at work:&nbsp; the global shortage of semiconductors.</p><p>“The&nbsp;chip shortage&nbsp;which has impacted the overall global auto industry, as well as Tesla’s recent price cuts, have dented some positive market dynamics for NIO …although we believe this will be short-lived,” said Wedbush analyst Dan Ives.</p><p>But how long? It’s far from clear. But there are indications it could last throughout the year. And since Nio relies on third-party manufacturing, this could put the company at more risk.</p><p>Despite all this, Ives is still bullish on Nio stock as are a myriad of other Wall Street analysts. According to&nbsp;Tipranks.com, the average price target is $68, which assumes 79% upside from current levels.</p><p><b>Bottom Line on Nio Stock</b></p><p>The past year has definitely been an inflection point for Nio. The company was able to deal with its quality problems and ramp production.</p><p>Nio was also able to introduce some innovations. For example,&nbsp;in early January the company launched its ET7 vehicle, which is a sedan. It has a sleek design, strong performance and full-stack autonomous driving systems. And yes, the reception has been particularly strong.</p><p>The company has also been innovative with its business model. To this end, it sells its batteries on a subscription basis, which should provide a nice recurring revenue stream. The same will go for its AI systems.</p><p>However, in terms of NIO stock, I actually still think there should be caution. Even with the drop-off, the valuation is far from cheap. Consider that Nio stock is trading at roughly 20 times revenues. This is steep for a capital-intensive company.</p><p>For the most part, it seems a better approach is to be patient on this one, such as until there is more stability in the stock price.</p>","source":"lsy1606302653667","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Nio Stock Looks as if It Is Going to Stay Volatile for a While</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nNio Stock Looks as if It Is Going to Stay Volatile for a While\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-03-15 16:26 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://investorplace.com/2021/03/nio-stock-volatile-for-a-while/><strong>InvestorPlace</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The warning lights are still flashing on Nio stockNio (NYSE:NIO) stock has been decelerating lately. Since early February, the shares have plunged from $60 to $45 — putting the market capitalization ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://investorplace.com/2021/03/nio-stock-volatile-for-a-while/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NIO":"蔚来"},"source_url":"https://investorplace.com/2021/03/nio-stock-volatile-for-a-while/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1147986042","content_text":"The warning lights are still flashing on Nio stockNio (NYSE:NIO) stock has been decelerating lately. Since early February, the shares have plunged from $60 to $45 — putting the market capitalization at $72 billion. Of course, NIO stock is still well above its low for the past 52 weeks, which was a mere $2 per share.The fact is that this Chinese electric car operator has been able to pull off a stellar turnaround.  Another catalyst has been the rebound in the economy.Yet the EV (Electric Vehicle) sector is going through a re-assessment from Wall Street. Of course, there has been tremendous selling pressure on other companies like Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA),Xpeng (NYSE:XPEV) and Li Auto (NASDAQ:LI).OK then, what’s next? Could this be a buying opportunity? Or should investors hold off on NIO stock for now?Here’s a look:The Fundamentals and NIO StockNio certainly had a robust fourth quarter. Revenues soared by 148% to $1.02 billion and the net loss was 14 cents a share, compared to a loss of 39 cents a share in the same period a year ago. The gross margin swung from -8.9% to 17.2%.In terms of the balance sheet, it got stronger as well. The cash balance went from $3.3 billion to $6.5 billion on a sequential basis. The company was smart to raise some capital when NIO stock was surging.But of course, expectations were extremely positive going into the earnings report. Thus, it really should not be any surprise that there was disappointment on Wall Street.The IssuesNow there was something in the report that was a red flag – that is, the deliveries for January came in over 7,200. This was below the 7,400 needed to hit its quarterly objectives.One reason for this could be the Lunar New Year holiday, in which a large part of the China essentially shuts down. But there may be another factor at work:  the global shortage of semiconductors.“The chip shortage which has impacted the overall global auto industry, as well as Tesla’s recent price cuts, have dented some positive market dynamics for NIO …although we believe this will be short-lived,” said Wedbush analyst Dan Ives.But how long? It’s far from clear. But there are indications it could last throughout the year. And since Nio relies on third-party manufacturing, this could put the company at more risk.Despite all this, Ives is still bullish on Nio stock as are a myriad of other Wall Street analysts. According to Tipranks.com, the average price target is $68, which assumes 79% upside from current levels.Bottom Line on Nio StockThe past year has definitely been an inflection point for Nio. The company was able to deal with its quality problems and ramp production.Nio was also able to introduce some innovations. For example, in early January the company launched its ET7 vehicle, which is a sedan. It has a sleek design, strong performance and full-stack autonomous driving systems. And yes, the reception has been particularly strong.The company has also been innovative with its business model. To this end, it sells its batteries on a subscription basis, which should provide a nice recurring revenue stream. The same will go for its AI systems.However, in terms of NIO stock, I actually still think there should be caution. Even with the drop-off, the valuation is far from cheap. Consider that Nio stock is trading at roughly 20 times revenues. This is steep for a capital-intensive company.For the most part, it seems a better approach is to be patient on this one, such as until there is more stability in the stock price.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":514,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":328494926,"gmtCreate":1615547534365,"gmtModify":1704784395481,"author":{"id":"3577498455923590","authorId":"3577498455923590","name":"n57tpt9U2","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0796a20219fda5104c45929cfeb79aa8","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577498455923590","authorIdStr":"3577498455923590"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Wow","listText":"Wow","text":"Wow","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/328494926","repostId":"1158535571","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1158535571","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1615542310,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1158535571?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-03-12 17:45","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Shell Reveals Oil-Trading Profit Doubled to $2.6 Billion in 2020","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1158535571","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"Royal Dutch Shell Plcdis closed the profitability of its sprawling and secretive oil trading unit fo","content":"<p>Royal Dutch Shell Plcdis&nbsp;closed the profitability of its sprawling and secretive oil trading unit for the first time, saying it almost doubled to $2.6 billion.</p>\n<p>The scale of the earnings show the importance of the business to the company in a year that weak demand and prices hit other parts of the business. Shell took advantage of wild price swings and a market situation that allowed it to make money by storing oil to sell it later for a profit.</p>\n<p>The company’s oil-trading profit in 2020 beat the highest ever net income achieved by Vitol Group, the world’s largest independent trading house, which made a record $2.3 billion in 2019. Vitol has yet to disclose 2020 earnings.</p>\n<p>Shell only disclosed earnings from oil trading in its annual report, and leaving power, natural gas and LNG trading out. Analysts suspect the company was able to make similar profits from those businesses.</p>\n<p>The revelation in its annual report comes as the firm is embarking on an energy transition in which Shell has said it will lean on its trading prowess to push through less-profitable renewables.</p>\n<p>Rival BP Plc made a similar&nbsp;disclosure&nbsp;last year when its Chief Executive Officer Bernard Looney revealed trading typically boosted returns by 2 percentage points a year, suggesting it makes annual profit of as much as much as $2.5 billion.</p>","source":"lsy1584095487587","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Shell Reveals Oil-Trading Profit Doubled to $2.6 Billion in 2020</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nShell Reveals Oil-Trading Profit Doubled to $2.6 Billion in 2020\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-03-12 17:45 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=http://bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-03-12/shell-reveals-oil-trading-profit-doubled-to-2-6-billion-in-2020?srnd=markets-vp><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Royal Dutch Shell Plcdis closed the profitability of its sprawling and secretive oil trading unit for the first time, saying it almost doubled to $2.6 billion.\nThe scale of the earnings show the ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"http://bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-03-12/shell-reveals-oil-trading-profit-doubled-to-2-6-billion-in-2020?srnd=markets-vp\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"RDS.A":"荷兰皇家壳牌石油A类股","RDS.B":"荷兰皇家壳牌石油B类股"},"source_url":"http://bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-03-12/shell-reveals-oil-trading-profit-doubled-to-2-6-billion-in-2020?srnd=markets-vp","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1158535571","content_text":"Royal Dutch Shell Plcdis closed the profitability of its sprawling and secretive oil trading unit for the first time, saying it almost doubled to $2.6 billion.\nThe scale of the earnings show the importance of the business to the company in a year that weak demand and prices hit other parts of the business. Shell took advantage of wild price swings and a market situation that allowed it to make money by storing oil to sell it later for a profit.\nThe company’s oil-trading profit in 2020 beat the highest ever net income achieved by Vitol Group, the world’s largest independent trading house, which made a record $2.3 billion in 2019. Vitol has yet to disclose 2020 earnings.\nShell only disclosed earnings from oil trading in its annual report, and leaving power, natural gas and LNG trading out. Analysts suspect the company was able to make similar profits from those businesses.\nThe revelation in its annual report comes as the firm is embarking on an energy transition in which Shell has said it will lean on its trading prowess to push through less-profitable renewables.\nRival BP Plc made a similar disclosure last year when its Chief Executive Officer Bernard Looney revealed trading typically boosted returns by 2 percentage points a year, suggesting it makes annual profit of as much as much as $2.5 billion.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":367,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":325612938,"gmtCreate":1615893654724,"gmtModify":1704788048870,"author":{"id":"3577498455923590","authorId":"3577498455923590","name":"n57tpt9U2","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0796a20219fda5104c45929cfeb79aa8","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577498455923590","authorIdStr":"3577498455923590"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good to know.............","listText":"Good to know.............","text":"Good to know.............","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/325612938","repostId":"1163228495","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1163228495","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1615885336,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1163228495?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-03-16 17:02","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple's iPhone 12, iPhone 12 Pro Trail Android Rivals In 5G Speeds: Report","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1163228495","media":"Benzinga","summary":"Apple Inc.’s  iPhone 12 lineup continues to lag behind its Android-based rivals in terms of 5G perfo","content":"<p><b>Apple Inc.’s</b>&nbsp;&nbsp;iPhone 12 lineup continues to lag behind its Android-based rivals in terms of 5G performance, according to a report from Opensignal.</p><p><b>What Happened:</b>&nbsp;Apple’s first-ever 5 G-enabled smartphones are ranked lower than at least 25 smartphones running<b>Alphabet Inc.’s</b>GOOGGOOGLAndroid operating system for overall download speed, as per the report.</p><p><b>Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.</b>&nbsp;OTCSSNLFaccounted for at least 60% of the top 25 5G smartphones that were ranked based on their average 5G or 4G download speeds. Samsung’s new Galaxy S21 5G, powered by&nbsp;<b>Qualcomm Inc.</b>&nbsp;Snapdragon 888, took the top spot with an average download speed of 56 Mbps.</p><p><b>TCL Electronics Holdings Limited’s</b>&nbsp;&nbsp;Revvl 5G and the OnePlus 8T+ took the second and third spots, with download speeds of 49.8 Mbps and 49.3 Mbps, respectively. The LG Velvet 5G was in 25th place with a download speed of 37.8 Mbps.</p><p>In comparison, the iPhone 12 Pro and iPhone 12 Pro Max had average download speeds of 36.9 and 36.2 Mbps, while the iPhone 12 and iPhone 12 mini clocked speeds of 29.6 and 32.9 Mbps, respectively.</p><p>However, the Apple devices had overall download speeds 2.3 times faster than their 4G iPhone counterparts that used older Intel modems, according to the report. In addition, the average download speeds on the 5G iPhone Pro models are 36% faster than the speeds on the most recent cellular iPad Pro models that are limited to 4G.</p><p><b>Why It Matters:</b>&nbsp;While the iPhone 12 models have been successful for Apple and helped the tech giant toreportbetter-than-expected first-quarter results earlier this year, the lineup’sbattery performancehas also fallen short.</p><p>The iPhone 12 is Apple’s first 5G device, while Samsung’s smartphones are the third generation of 5G devices.</p><p><b>Price Action:</b>&nbsp;Apple shares closed almost 2.5% higher on Monday at $123.99.</p>","source":"lsy1606299360108","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple's iPhone 12, iPhone 12 Pro Trail Android Rivals In 5G Speeds: Report</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple's iPhone 12, iPhone 12 Pro Trail Android Rivals In 5G Speeds: Report\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-03-16 17:02 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.benzinga.com/news/21/03/20182901/apples-iphone-12-iphone-12-pro-trail-android-rivals-in-5g-speeds-report><strong>Benzinga</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Apple Inc.’s  iPhone 12 lineup continues to lag behind its Android-based rivals in terms of 5G performance, according to a report from Opensignal.What Happened: Apple’s first-ever 5 G-enabled ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.benzinga.com/news/21/03/20182901/apples-iphone-12-iphone-12-pro-trail-android-rivals-in-5g-speeds-report\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://www.benzinga.com/news/21/03/20182901/apples-iphone-12-iphone-12-pro-trail-android-rivals-in-5g-speeds-report","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1163228495","content_text":"Apple Inc.’s  iPhone 12 lineup continues to lag behind its Android-based rivals in terms of 5G performance, according to a report from Opensignal.What Happened: Apple’s first-ever 5 G-enabled smartphones are ranked lower than at least 25 smartphones runningAlphabet Inc.’sGOOGGOOGLAndroid operating system for overall download speed, as per the report.Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. OTCSSNLFaccounted for at least 60% of the top 25 5G smartphones that were ranked based on their average 5G or 4G download speeds. Samsung’s new Galaxy S21 5G, powered by Qualcomm Inc. Snapdragon 888, took the top spot with an average download speed of 56 Mbps.TCL Electronics Holdings Limited’s  Revvl 5G and the OnePlus 8T+ took the second and third spots, with download speeds of 49.8 Mbps and 49.3 Mbps, respectively. The LG Velvet 5G was in 25th place with a download speed of 37.8 Mbps.In comparison, the iPhone 12 Pro and iPhone 12 Pro Max had average download speeds of 36.9 and 36.2 Mbps, while the iPhone 12 and iPhone 12 mini clocked speeds of 29.6 and 32.9 Mbps, respectively.However, the Apple devices had overall download speeds 2.3 times faster than their 4G iPhone counterparts that used older Intel modems, according to the report. In addition, the average download speeds on the 5G iPhone Pro models are 36% faster than the speeds on the most recent cellular iPad Pro models that are limited to 4G.Why It Matters: While the iPhone 12 models have been successful for Apple and helped the tech giant toreportbetter-than-expected first-quarter results earlier this year, the lineup’sbattery performancehas also fallen short.The iPhone 12 is Apple’s first 5G device, while Samsung’s smartphones are the third generation of 5G devices.Price Action: Apple shares closed almost 2.5% higher on Monday at $123.99.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":413,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":325145644,"gmtCreate":1615881527988,"gmtModify":1704787847984,"author":{"id":"3577498455923590","authorId":"3577498455923590","name":"n57tpt9U2","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0796a20219fda5104c45929cfeb79aa8","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577498455923590","authorIdStr":"3577498455923590"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/325145644","repostId":"2119293429","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2119293429","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1615880132,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2119293429?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-03-16 15:35","market":"sh","language":"en","title":"China shares rise as consumer firms regain footing","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2119293429","media":"Reuters","summary":"SHANGHAI, March 16 (Reuters) - Chinese shares finished higher on Tuesday, edging up from the previou","content":"<p>SHANGHAI, March 16 (Reuters) - Chinese shares finished higher on Tuesday, edging up from the previous day's slump as consumer and financial firms recovered, but broader gains were limited by investor wariness over possible policy tightening.</p>\n<p>At the close, the blue-chip CSI300 index was up 0.87%, after slumping more than 2% on Monday. The Shanghai Composite index was up 0.78% at 3,446.73.</p>\n<p>The consumer staples sector rose 2.05% after falling 2.2% a day earlier. The financial sector subindex&nbsp;rose 1.21%, real estate firms jumped 3.73% and the healthcare subindex added 0.96%.</p>\n<p>But with a conservative economic growth target this year widely viewed as giving regulators more room to cut back on pandemic-era stimulus, market players see little room for a strong rally.</p>\n<p>\"We are in this vortex... a vacuum of any catalyst that actually means anything directional or sentiment-wise to the market,\" said Andy Maynard, head of equities at China Renaissance in Hong Kong. \"Without a catalyst... we're not going anywhere. In fact, we're just going to probably drift lower.\"</p>\n<p>The smaller Shenzhen index ended up 1% and the start-up board ChiNext Composite index rose 1.06%.</p>\n<p>Around the region, MSCI's Asia ex-Japan stock index&nbsp;was firmer by 0.72%, while Japan's Nikkei index&nbsp;closed 0.52% higher.</p>\n<p>At 0700 GMT, the yuan was quoted at 6.4986 per U.S. dollar, 0.03% firmer than the previous close of 6.5006.</p>\n<p>So far this year, the Shanghai stock index is down 0.8% and the CSI300 has fallen 2.5%, while China's H-share index listed in Hong Kong is up 5.5%. Shanghai stocks have declined 1.78% this month.</p>\n<p>As of 0701 GMT, China's A-shares were trading at a premium of 34.72% over the Hong Kong-listed H-shares.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>China shares rise as consumer firms regain footing</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nChina shares rise as consumer firms regain footing\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-03-16 15:35</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>SHANGHAI, March 16 (Reuters) - Chinese shares finished higher on Tuesday, edging up from the previous day's slump as consumer and financial firms recovered, but broader gains were limited by investor wariness over possible policy tightening.</p>\n<p>At the close, the blue-chip CSI300 index was up 0.87%, after slumping more than 2% on Monday. The Shanghai Composite index was up 0.78% at 3,446.73.</p>\n<p>The consumer staples sector rose 2.05% after falling 2.2% a day earlier. The financial sector subindex&nbsp;rose 1.21%, real estate firms jumped 3.73% and the healthcare subindex added 0.96%.</p>\n<p>But with a conservative economic growth target this year widely viewed as giving regulators more room to cut back on pandemic-era stimulus, market players see little room for a strong rally.</p>\n<p>\"We are in this vortex... a vacuum of any catalyst that actually means anything directional or sentiment-wise to the market,\" said Andy Maynard, head of equities at China Renaissance in Hong Kong. \"Without a catalyst... we're not going anywhere. In fact, we're just going to probably drift lower.\"</p>\n<p>The smaller Shenzhen index ended up 1% and the start-up board ChiNext Composite index rose 1.06%.</p>\n<p>Around the region, MSCI's Asia ex-Japan stock index&nbsp;was firmer by 0.72%, while Japan's Nikkei index&nbsp;closed 0.52% higher.</p>\n<p>At 0700 GMT, the yuan was quoted at 6.4986 per U.S. dollar, 0.03% firmer than the previous close of 6.5006.</p>\n<p>So far this year, the Shanghai stock index is down 0.8% and the CSI300 has fallen 2.5%, while China's H-share index listed in Hong Kong is up 5.5%. Shanghai stocks have declined 1.78% this month.</p>\n<p>As of 0701 GMT, China's A-shares were trading at a premium of 34.72% over the Hong Kong-listed H-shares.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"399001":"深证成指","399006":"创业板指","000001.SH":"上证指数"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2119293429","content_text":"SHANGHAI, March 16 (Reuters) - Chinese shares finished higher on Tuesday, edging up from the previous day's slump as consumer and financial firms recovered, but broader gains were limited by investor wariness over possible policy tightening.\nAt the close, the blue-chip CSI300 index was up 0.87%, after slumping more than 2% on Monday. The Shanghai Composite index was up 0.78% at 3,446.73.\nThe consumer staples sector rose 2.05% after falling 2.2% a day earlier. The financial sector subindex rose 1.21%, real estate firms jumped 3.73% and the healthcare subindex added 0.96%.\nBut with a conservative economic growth target this year widely viewed as giving regulators more room to cut back on pandemic-era stimulus, market players see little room for a strong rally.\n\"We are in this vortex... a vacuum of any catalyst that actually means anything directional or sentiment-wise to the market,\" said Andy Maynard, head of equities at China Renaissance in Hong Kong. \"Without a catalyst... we're not going anywhere. In fact, we're just going to probably drift lower.\"\nThe smaller Shenzhen index ended up 1% and the start-up board ChiNext Composite index rose 1.06%.\nAround the region, MSCI's Asia ex-Japan stock index was firmer by 0.72%, while Japan's Nikkei index closed 0.52% higher.\nAt 0700 GMT, the yuan was quoted at 6.4986 per U.S. dollar, 0.03% firmer than the previous close of 6.5006.\nSo far this year, the Shanghai stock index is down 0.8% and the CSI300 has fallen 2.5%, while China's H-share index listed in Hong Kong is up 5.5%. Shanghai stocks have declined 1.78% this month.\nAs of 0701 GMT, China's A-shares were trading at a premium of 34.72% over the Hong Kong-listed H-shares.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":381,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}